This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
= [1 + p ( L 2 - 1)] u ,
(5-68)
where <~> is the average pore-space area over the network, and N is the different possible diameters for a section of pipe, each with the same length L i. McCauley (1992) showed that the electrical conductivity scaling exponent is: m^ = a 2 > 1 ,
(5-69)
forp ~ 1, and Eq. 5-69 yields m^--+ 1 asp ~ 1. Derivation of Eq. 5-69 is based on the fact that the inverse conductivity is additive for resistors connected in series. McCauley (1992) pointed out that this bond-shrinkage model was originally introduced from the qualitative standpoint of percolation theory to model the zero-percolation threshold. The probability that a section of tube is shrunken n times by the factor L = 1/a (L m = a -m) from unit radius to form a section with radius L m is pm, and (1 __p)N-m is the probability to find a segment of pipe of unit radius as described by the bond shrinkage model (McCauley, 1992). The bond shrinkage model was originally introduced by Wong et al. (1984) to model the zero-percolation threshold. Hence, with P(m ^) = pm^(1 --p)N-m^N! / m ^ ! ( N - m6)! resulted in Eq. 5-68.
396
L
Fig. 5-79. Disordered, nonfractal, one-dimensional model based upon tubes of different cross-sectional area in series. (After McCauley, 1992, fig. 11" courtesy of Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.) As indicated the shrinking procedure can be repeated indefinitely with the same L to reduce the network conductance and permeability, and the total volume of the tubes. The effective permeability for this binomial distribution is equal to" -1
kfr = [1 + p(L -4 - 1)]N,
(5-70)
and m--
ln[1 + p ( L -~- 1)]
(5-71)
ln[1 + p ( L ~ - 1)] Whenever, p ~ 1, m = m^(m ^ + 1) > 2m ^, whereas m ~ 2, ifp --~ 1, which corresponds to a long pipe with constant diameter in Fig. 5-79 (McCauley, 1992). An a, o r p and a, can be chosen to fit m ^ z 3/2, but it is then impossible to obtain m ~ 15/2 as is suggested for sandstone. The predicted scaling exponent for the effective permeability is too small, which means that the fluid flows too easily (a too high permeability) through the pore-space of the bond-shrinkage rock model (McCauley, 1992).
397
.-,,...%,\\,~
,'N\\\\" ~. \ \ \ \ \ \ \
~ \\\" \
Fig. 5-80. Schematic ofMcCauley's (1992) combined model that is fractal and disordered. The model is a generalization of the model shown in Fig. 5-79 to include complete binary connectivity. The generalization to models with complete trees with order t = 3,4,5 . . . . is obvious. This new model reduces to the model presented in Fig. 5-78B where t = 2, whenever p approaches unity, but also reduces to the disordered, nonfractal one-dimensional model for the special case where t = 1. (After McCauley, 1992, fig. 12; courtesy of Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.)
Composite model. McCauley (1992) proposed that a rock model can be constructed by combining Wong et al.'s (1984) and Adler's (1986) models into a composite model having equations based on a single-scale fractal. This model would then be extended by McCauley (1992) to a general model based on multiscale fractal. The composite model corresponds to a simple parallel/series network of resistors where there is variation in both porosity and the number of pores from one thin-section to another (Fig. 5-80). The "thin-section" concept (McCauley used the term toy rock) is derived by taking multiple thin slices of a theoretical rock and stacking them so that the sections correspond to the above network. McCauley (1992) generalized results, which correspond to the binary organization of Fig. 5-80, yielding in the following relationships for porosity, permeability, and conductivity: <$> = [1 + p(2L 2 - 1)] N,
(5-72)
398 -1
Gear = [1 + p ( 2 - ' L -2 - 1)] N
(5-73)
and -1
k e~ = [1 + p ( 2 - ' L -4 - 1)]u.
(5-74)
From these equations, the composite model gives the following equations for conductivity and permeability, respectively: ln[1 + p(2-'L -2 - 1)] m^ =
(5-75)
ln[1 + p(ZL 2 - 1)]
and ln[1 + p ( 2 - ' L --4 - 1)] m=-
ln[1 + p ( Z L 2 - 1)]
,
(5-76)
Wong et al.'s (1984) exponent equations are obtained when p ~ 1 for electrical conductivity and permeability, respectively: m ^ ~ 89 2,
(5-77)
and
a2( 89 4 - 1) m~
( a 2 - 2)
,
(5-78)
McCauley (1992, p. 43) showed that the limit p --~ 1 yields the parallel tube [or Adler (1986)-1ike Sierpinski carpet model] results: m ^ = 1, and m = ( 4 - D o ) / ( 2 - D o ) , where D o = ln2/lna (ln is the natural log). If a is set equal to 2, then m ^ = 2 and m~ m 6 - 7 from Eqs. 5-77 and 5-78 (McCauley, 1992). These results are very reasonable. In order to obtain an m ^ value of 2.5, p can be kept small and a increased in Eqs. 5-75 and 5-76. Also p and a can be varied. Manipulation of the values can be made to get m ^ = 1.4 by holding a constant and increasing p, because m ^ = 1 when p = 1. McCauley (1992) showed how to get larger values of the permeability exponent for a given value of conductivity exponent. He introduced connectivity (branching) of a complete binary tree. There is a limit in the composite model, as there was in Wong et al.'s (1984) model, where both the porosity and permeability are log-normally distributed (see McCauley, 1992, p. 44). By generalizing Eqs. 5-72 to 5-76 to a complete tree or order t, McCauley (1992) simply replaced the tree order of 2 by t, where t can take on values of 1, 2, 3 , . . . . resulting in m ^ and m exponents in the log-normal limit:
399 1 + [(1-p)/2](4-Do)lna m^ ~
(5-79) 1 - [(1 - p ) / 2 ] ( 2 - Do)lna
and
m/m ^ ~, (4 - Do)/(2 - Do).
(5-80)
Multifractal rock model. McCauley (1992) stated that the log-normal limit correctly reproduced the trivial limit of parallel tubes, where p = 1. Ifp is small, then the limit cannot be reproduced in the log-normal approximation. McCauley (1992, p.45) then discussed treating Eqs. 5-72 to 5-80, which are based upon a single-scale fractal, as a multiscale or nonuniform fractal. The transverse thin-sections of pore space o f the simplest multiscale fractal are a two-scale fractal. The reader is referred to the discussion on multifractal characterization later in this chapter. McCauley (1990) and Ijjasz-Vasquex et al. (1992) provided a complete background on multifractals and their applications in dynamic systems. The simplest case of a multifractal distribution of pore-space area can be envisioned where the porosity of a very thin slice of carbonate rock has a thickness that is small compared to the size of the largest pores, as being built by iterating two length scales L~ and L 2. McCauley (1992, p. 33) stated that in the first generation (n = 1) the scale L~ occurs b times, then L 2 occurs t - b times, where b is any integer between 0 and t - 1 and b = 0. Thus, for t" tubes connected in parallel, porosity and permeability are:= [tL 2, +
(5-81)
and G=
[bL 4 +
(5-82)
McCauley suggested that it is useful to introduce the canonical partition function, which is a generating function:
Z(fl) = [bl ~ + ( t - b)l~2 ]",
(5-83)
where g(fl) = - l n Z ( f l ) / n is analogous to the Gibbs potential per particle because n is analogous to the number of particles in ordinary statistical mechanics. Models like Eq. 5-83 follow from deterministic chaos (McCauley, 1992, p. 34). McCauley's (1992) Eqs. 5-72 to 5-78 are based upon a single-scale fractal. If the transverse thin-sections of pore space are represented by a multiscale fractal, then McCauley's simplest case is that of the two-scale fractal shown by the above Eqs. 581 to 5-83. Equations 5-72 to 5-76 restated for two-scale fractal are: <~b> = [1 + p(e -g(2)-- 1)IN,
(5-84)
400 -1
Gfr = [ 1 + p(e g~2)- 1)]u,
(5-85)
-1 keff = [1 + p ( e -g(4) - 1)]N,
(5-86)
resulting in In[ 1 + p(e -~z) - 1)] m^ = -
(5-87)
In[ 1 + p(e ~2) - 1)]
and In[ 1 + p(e -g~4)- 1)] m=
In[ 1 + p(e g~2)- 1)]
.
(5-88)
The general model explains two important facts: (1) connectivity (branching) is the way to obtain a large m / m ^ ratio with m^ > 1, and (2) nonuniversality of the scaling exponents m and m ^ results by varying both the first generation length scale L~ = 1/a and the probability p. McCauley's (1992) approach and interpretation were not based upon ideas from equilibrium statistical mechanics having attributes of universal critical exponents and formal percolation theory, but are based upon ideas from chaos theory. Chaos theory describes transport far from thermal equilibrium using trees, weak universality, multifractals, and nonuniversal scaling laws. McCauley concluded that in the dynamic model, the tree order describes how different thin-sections with different porosity values connect with each other. The very small diameter pore throats provide the connections between the pores, and typically require large scale magnification of a thin-section in order to be observed. McCauley speculated that a sufficiently accurate photograph of a thin-section, which reveals the smallest pore throats, would lead to a connectivity parameter t that agrees with what is needed to explain the transport exponents. Again, the writers observe that Teodorovich's (1943, 1949, 1958) ideas on the structure of carbonate rocks and his approach to calculate permeabilities from thin-sections of carbonate rocks gain additional support. McCauley (1992) suggested that microscale scaling laws for conductivity and permeability with experimentally known exponents m and m ^ should be used as a constraint to test models ofmacroscale permeability distributions. If a resistance network used to model a permeability distribution cannot reproduce the experimentally known exponents for the microscale reservoir, then it is unlikely that the model will be correct in predicting the performance or other properties of the macroscopic reservoir from which the rock and fluid samples were taken (McCauley, 1992). At this time, the real space renormalization group method employing resistance networks needs to be considered. This method is an effective scaling-up, numerical tool that greatly improves conventional carbonate reservoir performance modeling. Permeability renormalization is discussed and is an averaging process that replaces a large array of small-scale effective permeabilities with a smaller array of larger-scale effective permeabilities.
401 Turcotte (1992) defined renormalization as the transformation of a set of equations from one scale to another by a change of variables. Advantages in using renormalization are: (1) A cost-savings computational technique over previous techniques, which compared coarse-grid simulations with fine-grid simulations. Saucier (1992) recounted that even if all the permeability data were actually available for a reservoir, then a complete three-dimensional picture of the permeability field at a mesoscopic scale of resolution could exceed the capacity of existing super computers or else be prohibitively expensive to process. These data, at present, are rather sparsely known for a reservoir and are expensive to process. (2) Higher resolution of details on a much finer scale than finite difference techniques. (3) Accurate estimates of the pressure drop across a heterogeneous system for fluid flow in oil reservoirs. Finally, the real space renormalization group method will be used to calculate scaling exponents in multifractal porous media.
Real space renormalization group method The requirement to use average (effective or pseudo) property values for grid blocks in reservoir simulation was previously discussed in this section. King (1989) discounted the use of both perturbation theory and effective medium theory (EMT) as effective techniques to replace an inhomogeneous medium by an effective homogeneous medium when property fluctuations, such as permeability, become very large. If the fluctuations are small, then the perturbation theory or EMT give reliable estimates of the effective property. With respect to perturbation theory, the problem lies in the fact that when the property variance is large the result is invalid. The assumption behind EMT is that the mean fluctuations in the pressure field are negligible and average to zero (King, 1989). In the case of permeability, as permeability fluctuations increase, however, pressure fluctuations do not increase and effective medium approximations break down. The position-space renormalization approach originated in physics and the seed of its origin is attributed to Kadanoff (1966). This method can produce fractal statistics and explicitly utilizes scale invariance. King (1989) proposed the use of realspace renormalization to calculate effective absolute permeability values in a h e t e r o g e n e o u s medium. By adopting this method, the effective absolute permeabilities are rescaled in order to utilize the same system at the next larger scale. Figure 5-81 illustrates the scaling-up methodology. The process is repeated using larger and larger scaled-grid blocks until the initial grid is reduced to a singlegrid block (single effective value) for a small localized region. This process is repeated by combining various localized regions into blocks and reducing them to a single effective value, thereby coarsening the grid. Block renormalization of the grid is repeated until the desired part, or the entirety, of the reservoir has been realized. Application. King (1968) and King et al. (1993) discussed the renormalization procedure in detail. They showed that the procedure for isotropic media can be extended
402 NO
ROW
No Row
.~
No Flow
.~
K 22
K
K
K
K
K
K
13
p 1
31 3
14
23
32
K
34
24
K 1
K
K
43
42
K P 2
P 1
P 2
P 1
eft
P 2
K
44
Fig. 5-81. The real space renormalization method is illustrated in two dimensions for an initial 4 x 4 grid, which coarsens from left to right. Assuming an isotropic medium, the effective permeability (kff) is calculated in only one direction (horizontal). Horizontal boundaries represent impermeable barriers (no flow). Fluid flow occurs in the x-direction from left to right (pressure in (P~,) > pressure out (Pout))"
to three-dimensions and immiscible flow. Here, only single-phase flow is discussed using permeability as an example. First, the properties have to be distributed on a fine grid. The scale-length of the grid has to be representative of the original data sample size. For example, if the permeabilities are derived from core samples at one-foot intervals, then the initial grid blocks should have dimensions of one foot (King, 1989). The only required input is a permeability probability distribution. The permeability distributions to be averaged are taken from the sample distributions determined from cores. Initially, the renormalization method involves averaging over small regions of the reservoir to form a new averaged permeability distribution with a lower variance than the original distribution. This pre-averaging is then repeated until a stable estimate is found. King (1989) considered only uncorrelated media in his examples so that the permeabilities are randomly distributed. This was done by King to avoid the separate issue of handling correlated media. In order to treat correlated media one needs statistical methods for generating large grids of correlated variables. Once the permeability grid has been established, the same renormalization techniques can be used for correlated media. King (1989) organized the initial grid block into blocks of four in two dimensions (for three dimensions there are eight blocks initially). The effective permeability of the four blocks is calculated and assigned to a new, coarser grid composed of one block (Fig. 5-81). A coarse-grid reservoir model can represent all scales of heterogeneity associated with the reservoir, whereas a fine-grid model can represent only small to medium scale heterogeneities. King et al. (1993) pointed out that the accuracy of the final coarse-grid simulation is only as accurate as the fine-grid simulations used to derive the pseudo properties. One drawback to this procedure is that the results of the coarse-grid simulations cannot be checked as no fine-grid model can reproduce all scales of property variation. The resulting effective permeability is a single value retaining the same flow as the initial blocks and the original pressure drop (King, 1989). The process is repeated many times until a stable effective permeability is
403
P 2
A
B
C
Fig. 5-82. Modeling block permeabilities by using an equivalent resistor network. (A) Resistor network showing each block with a cross of resistors. (B) Resistor network that is identically equal to (A). The end edges were set to a uniform pressure. (C) An equivalent resistor network created by trimming off the dead-end edges of the four blocks and joining together those nodes with the same pressure. found for the area (volume) being investigated. The variance in the permeability and the correlation length in correlated media are reduced as the permeability approaches the value of the whole region. King's (1989, p. 43) procedure involves the development of probability distributions by Monte Carlo sampling. In this manner the permeability distribution on the old grid is transformed to obtain an approximate Gaussian probability distribution on the new grid. The next step is to calculate the effective permeability of the renormalized block.
Calculation of renormalized permeabilities. King (1989) and King et al. (1993) described how to calculate the effective permeability of the renormalized block. The block permeabilities are modeled using an equivalent resistor network with the boundary condition that the external edges of the blocks are at uniform pressure (Fig. 5-82). This is not true, however, for the internal edges, and is a source of error if the permeabilities are arranged in particular configurations (King, 1989). Such configurations are rare events, and even under those situations, the error is small. The permeability field can be estimated by using a resistor network, where each block is replaced by a resistor cross. The blocks of four in Fig. 5-81 were replaced with a cross of resistors as shown in Fig. 5-82A. Each equivalent resistor between the midpoints of the edges is 1/k for a block of permeability K. After hooking up the resistor crosses together, the boundary conditions are set so that the sides of the blocks are at constant voltage. This corresponds to a uniform pressure on both vertical boundaries as shown in Fig. 5-81. The inverse of the equivalent resistance of this circuit yields an estimate of the effective permeability field (Saucier, 1992). Figure 5-82B shows a resistor network that is identically equal to Fig. 5-82A. The dead end edges in Fig. 5-82B are trimmed off, and the nodes having the same pressure are joined together, resulting in the equivalent resistor network (Fig. 5-82C). King (1989) applied the star-triangle transformation (shown in Fig. 5-83A to the resistor relationships in Fig. 5-82C) to give a circuit composed of resistors in series and parallel (Fig. 5-83B). The star-triangle transformation is very useful for reducing resistor networks to a simpler form. The circuit in Fig. 5-83C is equivalent to the circuit in Fig. 5-83B. In two dimensions the effective permeability (K~r) of the four blocks is reduced to:
404 R
A
3
B
A
B
c p
C
C
e
11w
f~
//~
aL
IF
p
2
,Q A
B
C
C Fig. 5-83. Simplification of the resistor network. (A) Star-triangle transformation scheme used by King (1989). Examples of the resistor transformation equations are shown. (B) Transformation of Fig. 5-82C into a circuit having resistors in series and parallel. (C) Simplified circuit equivalent to B.
4(K~ + K3) (K 2 + K4) x Kff =
[K2K4(K 1 + K3) + K1K3(K 2 + K4) ] [K, + K 2 + K 3 + K41 +
[K~K4(X, + X~) + X.K~(K~ +/';,)1
(5-89)
3(K, + K2) (K 3 + K4) (K l + K3) (K 2 + K4) Not only can the effective permeability of the four blocks be calculated by Eq. 589, but also the current in the resistors (fluxes between the fine-grid cells) can be established in a similar manner. The reader is referred to King et al. (1993, p. 241) for a complete discussion. .. ... The effective permeability (K) of the four block permeabilities can be written as:
x =/(K., K~, X~, X,).
(5-90)
If the permeability distribution on the old grid is P(K), then the probability distribution (P(K)) on the new grid is: P ( K ) = 3 fi(K - f(K,, K 2, K 3, K4) x P(KI)P(K2)P(K3)(dKIdK2dK3dK4) ,
(5-91)
405 where the integrations are performed over all possible values of the original grid block permeabilities K ~ , . . . , K 4 (two dimensions) or K ~ , . . . , K 8 (three dimensions) (King, 1989, p. 43). The block renormalized permeability f({K}) is used in Eq. 5-91 in order to determine the renormalized probability for the permeability. King (1989) developed the probability distribution by Monte-Carlo sampling. K~, K 2, K 3, and K 4 are selected first from the original probability distribution so that the effective permeability can be calculated using Eq. 5-90. This is repeated until a satisfactory distribution P(K) is built up (King, 1989). King (1989) noted that the variability in permeability observed from small-lengthscale samples such as cores is not necessarily that which should be used at the reservoir simulator grid-block scale. He showed that the distribution parameters behave in the following manner under renormalization for the two-dimensions case. K n+l
= Kn
(5-92)
+ 1 "- d 2 n / 4 -
(5-93)
and d~
The mean of the distribution is unchanged and the variance is reduced by a factor of four. Figure 5-84 shows the effect of three repeated renormalizations on a uniform probability distribution. The result of repeated renormalization is to arrive at a single value. The probability distribution reduces to a delta function, which is the limit of a Gaussian distribution for a small variance. P(Ki) in Eq. 5-91 is considered by King (1989, p. 46) to be Gaussian. King (1989) and Saucier (1992) noted that there are several problems connected with the real space renormalization method. These drawbacks include: (1) the possibility of hooking the resistor crosses in many different arrangements, thereby leading to different estimates of Kfr; (2) the approximations involved are difficult to quantify; (3) the accuracy of the predictions remains unknown in actual field practice. Numerical experiments performed on various reservoir test cases by King (1989), Mohanty and Sharma (1990), and Aharony et al. (1991) have proved this method to be accurate; (4) if the flow paths are very contorted (have a high tortuosity), then the resistor network does not provide a good representation; (5) the estimate of effective permeability is poor, when there is a high contrast between neighboring permeabilities, such as exhibited by a shaley carbonate reservoir; and (6) King's (1989) approach will not give a direct realization of the flow paths. King et al. (1993) stressed two important attributes of the renormalization method: (1) this procedure is about 100 times faster (in terms of computer time) when compared with pseudoization, which is computationally intensive, and (2) the speed allows us to run a larger number of statistical realizations of permeability heterogeneity, which provides a better estimate of uncertainty in reservoir performance prediction. The following discussion of Saucier's (1992) work on effective permeability concentrates on how the real space renormalization group method can be used to calculate
406 1.5 ORIGINAL
A
DISTROBUTION SUCCESSIVE RENORMALIZATIONS
v ft.
I.o
:i
,IP .,,i ,,-t ,,e
,0 0.5 .o 0
i
:
'
i
~
.;
.............
1
.......
2
.......
3
i
,../o:.............. ',\ ,....~
I.,
a,
..... /,
,, '<..
9
I
0.0
..." .... /"9
2.
0.
.,."
/
..... 9
.
I
_.,.._,,
/
~
'
,
~
, ,_
4. Permeability
"~
...
"\
"~ ...............
iS.
8.
4.6
e..
L.
B
10.
(K)
|
6.0
I
...
~.._
C
~L,
.Q......., o ..
... ....
4.6
"-~. "'....
o..
4.4, ...................................
9 .......
~
......
@
.......
9 .......
,41, . . . . . .
~
........
~7,
... ..
~..
4.0
... "o......
4.2
0 n
2. (no.
of
4. 6. 8. renormalizations)
tO.
--LL.
~.
o n
(no.
",,;. of
~'4.
"
~i.
renormailzattons)
to
Fig. 5-84. Examples of the effect of a successive renormalization on a uniform probability distribution and the scaling of two probability parameters in two dimensions. (A) Repeated renormalization of a uniform probability distribution; (B) Scaling of the mean; (C) Scaling of the variance. (After King, 1989, figs. 3 and 4; reprinted with the permission of Kluwer Academic Publishers.) analytically the scaling exponents of the effective absolute permeability in multifractal porous media. An insight into the process of calculating effective permeability ofrandom multifractal permeability fields helps one to become aware of the analytical foundation of this new modeling technology. Such an approach enhances reservoir performance prediction in carbonate reservoirs by increasing greatly the ability to characterize microscopic heterogeneity and to scale-up the results on a reservoir-wide basis.
Multifractal characterization A brief but concise orientation on the nature of multiscaling is in order before applying renormalization to multifractal porous media. This presentation provides direction and help in deciphering the mathematical thrust behind the multifractal pore space--permeability relationships and shows renormalization strategies used in threedimensional modeling.
407
Multifractals. By now, one has probably realized that fractals fall into two categories: geometrically self-similar (uniform) fractals, and nonuniform (multiscale) fractals called multifractals. McCauley (1990) pointed out that the fractals found in nature and in the analysis of nontrivial dynamic systems are statistically self-similar, but not geometrically self-similar. Multifractal theory was developed in order to manage nonuniform fractals and gives one the ability to analyze and to better model nature. The distribution of reservoir properties, such as pore space in sedimentary rocks, was shown previously to be fractal. By using the geometrically self-similar approach, the multifractal nature of pore space was not distinguishable over several decades of length scales from that of a two-scale Sierpinski carpet (a planar Cantor set). Information describing the detail of the differences between fractals and multifractals got lost. It was demonstrated previously that fractals are constructed by using a recursion formula. The next term of the fractal sequence is determined from one or more of the preceding terms and conditions. McCauley's (1992) approach to models of permeability and conductivity suggested that one should think of a fractal as a collection of fragments that can be organized into a hierarchy such as a tree model. A geometrically self-similar fractal is constructed by iterating a single first-generation length (L) repeatedly, so that all the L i will have the same value L" in the nth generation (McCauley, 1990). A multifractal, however, is constructed by repeated iteration of two or more first-generation length scales and the result is a nonuniform fractal. Multifractal statistics give both moments and correlations. Mandelbrot (1988) emphasized that the notion of self-similarity extends readily from fractal sets to multifractal measures. That is the passage from geometric objects characterized primarily by one number (fractal dimension) to geometric objects characterized by a function (in this case a limited probability distribution). A multifractal measure is a way of specifying a method of distributing probability, mass, or other material relationships over a supporting set, such as planar, uniform, and nonuniform Cantor sets. By knowing the multifractal spectrum one can compute all moments at all length scales for which the scaling holds (Muller et al., 1992). If scaling is observed, then the multifractal spectrum provides a wealth of statistical information. Turcotte (1992) has an excellent discussion on connecting fractal distributions to probability. Figures 5-85A and B portray a uniform Cantor set and a nonuniform Cantor set, respectively. The uniform Cantor set is constructed recursively by the iteration of a single length scale L = 1/3 (Fig. 5-85A), whereas a nonuniform Cantor-set's construction involved two rescaling parameters L~ = 1/4 and L 2 = 2/5 (Fig. 5-85B). These two types of Cantor sets were used by McCauley (1990) as examples for explaining support for generated probability distributions. McCauley, however, recognized that this approach is not the best either for the analysis of experimental data or for computations, and opted for a more direct formulation using the generating function X(q). McCauley (1990; 1992) proposed that we should think of a fractal as a collection of fragments that can be organized into a hierarchy, or tree. In this collection there are boxes N =].~n fragments with box sizes L~, L2,..., LNn in the nth generation. If the fractal is geometrically self-similar, then it can be constructed recursively by the repeated iteration of a single first-generation length scale L (McCauley, 1990, p. 229).
RANDOM
ORDERED ~=0
'n=O
III
=1
PI = I/2
P2=1/2
L I :1/3
L 2 = I/3
2
2
2
P2=n/4
-
-2
L 2 = I/9
I
=3
2
P2= n/4
PI=V4 Pl=l/4 = 2 ~ L2= 119
P 2"
Ll,l/4
L2=2/5
I
2 2 P 1=9/25,FI P2,,6/25 PI P'z's/'ZS, P I ' 4 / z 5 ~
LI~B=I/I6,LIL~I/IO
LIL2"I/IO ,Ltn~,4/25
P~=l/e m i U U L t = 1/27
P03 : lie am j a am I a L31=1/27
2/5
P I 315 9
= J
i
B
A
=3
=4 IllliillliiilllillilllllliLllilllililllllllililllllmillillllWBil C
NONUNIFORM
UNIFORM
VARIATIONS I
II i ii
nmmml / IN II Ii I1 Jl t
i
H
II II ii
oo
'n=O
I |0: I Wl
|1111 i
II
Ol II
III
i
I |
ilia i mi
6L: I / Z
w2 ill
Wl
64=l/Is . . . . . . . .
L i W2
Wl
L"''J"'"
D
E
F
UNIFORM
UNIFORM
UNIFORM
409 As shown by the Cantor set examples (Fig. 5-85), a multifractal requires an iteration of two or more different length scales of construction by recursion (Fig. 5-85B). McCauley (1990) pointed out that the resulting fractal is nonuniform, but statistically self-similar in that the relation N,, " L~ -~ holds. The generating function X(q) is defined by McCauley (1990, p. 229) for the partition width {Zi} as:
Nnq X(q) = Y~P~ , i=l
(5-94)
and is the sum over all boxes of the qth power of box probabilities P. N is the number of boxes (bins; cells) covering an image or object, n is the number of iterations, and q is a moment. So N is the number of cells required to resolved the dynamics after n iterations (McCauley, 1990, p. 231). The generalized dimension (Dq) is expressed by McCauley (1990) as: X(q) = L
n
(q - l ) D q ,
(5-95)
where L denotes the characteristic size of the N boxes (bins) with various widths Li for each generation n of coarse-graining of phase space in dynamic (chaotic) systems. Multifractal relationships. At this point in multifractal discussion, it is necessary to provide an expanded, but basic, description of multifractal spatial organization and scaling properties. Also this formalism leads to recent analyses which improve on the initial studies by Katz and Thompson (1985), Roberts (1986), and Krohn (1988a,b) (see page 264). It is not only the basis for differentiating multifractal pore-systems in carbonate reservoirs, but also in attempting to relate the multifractals to measured permeability (Muller, 1992; Garrison et al., 1993c). These investigations are also discussed here. The following approach will show how q, exponents, and other parameters are defined in the context of a multifractal spectrum. Fig. 5-85 (opposite). Cantor set constructions. ( A ) - Uniform Cantor set was constructed by removing the central third of each line segment, creating a triadic set. The set is constructed recursively by the iteration of a single-length scale ofL = 1/3. Each of the two intervals receives the same measure (probability)p = 1/2, I/4 . . . . . nth, each of length L = 1/3. Using Eq. 5-11 [D = log N/log (I/r)] the fractal dimension (D) can be calculated for all constructions except (B) - N is the number of identical line segments retained having a characteristic length (r), and the relation between L and r is r = 1/Ln; at r = 1/L~, where L = 1/3, r - 3; D = 0.6309. (B) Nonuniform (multifractal) Cantor set is constructed by using two rescalings LI = 1/ 4 and L2= 2/5 and the respective measure rescalings for each interval Pi = 3/5 andP 2 = 2/5. The multifractal dimension can be computed using Eq. 5-97. As indicated in examples (A) and (B), the values of P for each line segment of order n are obtained by using the binomial expression [(a + b)"]. (C) - Random Cantor set was constructed by removing randomly a third of each line. Examples (D) and (E) are uniform Cantor sets with the same D = 0.5, but each having different configurations. ( F ) - Saucier (1992) used a uniform fractal having four cascade steps (n 5 = ~4 = 4) and two different weights WI and W2 to study the effective permeability of a deterministic multifractal permeability field as a function of scale. The inner scale is S4 - (1/2)4/~o 9Horizontal brackets enclosed all the values of permeability in this interval which share the same multipliers at scales 61 and 62 (that is, w ( ~ ) = w E, and w(62) = wR). The reader is referred to page 426 for an explanation of the formulas used to describe the permeabilities generated by the cascade process. ((F) is after Saucier, 1992, fig. 7; courtesy of North-Holland.)
410 The concept of a multifractal spectrum (formalism) is expressed by: (5-96)
f ( a ) = p(a) + m a x f ( a ) ,
where f(a) is a fractal dimension (also known as the spectrum of singularity: Halsey et al., 1986) of the subset of boxes characterized by the exponent a. a is the crowding index or H61der exponent (Mandelbrot, 1988) (also known as the singularity strength: Halsey et al., 1986)), and p(a) is a limited probability distribution function. The curve resulting from a plot o f f ( a ) vs. a is known as the multifractal spectrum (Halsey et al., 1986). Figure 5-86 is a generalized diagram of a typical multifractal spectrum illustrating graphically the various relationships between exponents and parameters. The bell-shaped curve provides a picture of the full complexity of the scaling structure. The function t(q) is a standard probabilistic tool to represent measures, called the cumulant generating function (Mandelbrot, 1988). Exponents t(q) are related to the set of generalized fractal dimensions Dqby: D
q
- t(q)/(q-
1),
(5-97)
and these quantities are called the 'critical dimensions' by Mandelbrot (1988). Equation 5-97 implies multiscaling (different values of D q for every value of q). Hentschel and Procaccia (1983) noted that there exist a hierarchy of critical dimensions that are defined for any q >_0. The similarity dimension (D) is defined as: f(a)
~
Slope : 1 Stope q
Do
)) D,
f(a( q
I
I -r(q)
'
I I
~Q
el=IJa(q) a(O} Fig. 5-86. Schematic of a typical multifractal spectrum (orf(a) - a curve) diagram. Do is the Hausdorff dimension defined by the maximum value of a continuous functionf(a). The information dimension (D l) lies at the point wheref(a) = f ' ( a ) = a = 1. The reader is referred to McCauley (1990, fig. 2.3, p. 234) for the geometrical construction showing how to locate the correlation dimension (D2). r(q) is the ordinate of the intercept of the tangent of slope q by the vertical axis.
411 lim D q = D. q--+0
(5-98)
The information dimension (D~) is defined as: lim D q = D 1. q ---~ 1
(5-99)
D l measures how the information required to describe the measure scales with In(l/6) (refer to the elementary box counting technique mentioned on page 264). The correlation dimension (D2) is defined as: lim
Dq = D 2.
(5-100)
q-2 If the D q values are the same for every value of q, then the measure reflects simple scaling. For the case where box counting is used, f(a) would be the fractal dimension of the set of boxes with the same a value. This formalization has its basis in a relationship where a grid with boxes of size r is superimposed over an area of interest, such as a map or image displaying the distribution of a property of interest. Carbonate rock porosity images are such an example. Ijjasz-Vasquez et al. (1992, p. 298) gave an excellent discussion on how this part of the procedure is accomplished. The behavior of the probability measure Pr(X) with r showing the organization of the property of interest around the point x is described as: Pr(X) "~ (r/L) a,
(5-101 )
where r is the box length, L is the overall length of the area under investigation (L = rmax) , and a is the H61der exponent. A log-log plot of Pr(X) (cumulative value of the property in the box) vs. r/L results in a straight line whose slope is a. It is necessary to count the number of N ( a ) of grid boxes with common values o f a (Ijjasz-Vasquez et al., 1992). There are usually many boxes with the same index a. It was pointed out by Ijjasz-Vasquez et al. (1992) that these grid boxes are mixed and interwoven inside the domain of study. Their number depends on the size r of the grid boxes and scales as:
Nr(a ) ~ (r/L) -s(~ ).
(5-102)
A log-log plot of Nr(a ) vs. a results in a straight line whose slope is -f(a). The numerical calculation of the multifractal spectrum based on Eqs. 5-101 and 5-102 requires large amount of data and is affected by logarithmic prefactors that depend on the grid box size r. A direct procedure used by Ijjasz-Vasquez et al. (1992) to calculate the multifractal spectrum uses the cumulants of order q of Pr(X). Their method consists of three steps based on relating the scaling behavior of C ( r ) with r for different values of q with the multifractal spectrum. The procedure is:
412 (1) Find the cumulants C(r) from: C ( r ) = Zi[Pr(Xi)] q,
(5-103)
where the centers X i of the boxes have been indexed. (2) Calculate r(q); the scaling behavior of C(r) with box size r is expressed as:
C(r) ~ (i'lL) t(q).
(5-104)
The exponents r(q) are related to D by Eq. 5-97. When q = 0, Co(r) measures how many boxes of size r are occupied b~r the measure and D Ois the fractal dimension of the support set where the variable of interest is studied (if an entire reservoir map is used then D O= 2) (Ijjasz-Vasquez et al., 1992). The values of the moment q are integers (q = 0, + 1, +2, +3, . . . . ,). If the values of D are different for every value of q, then this is a condition known as multiscaling. Sir~ple scaling is where D q values are the same for every value of q. (3) Lastly, determine a and f ( a ) using the values of r(q). Ijjasz-Vasquez et al. (1992, p. 300) showed that it was possible to relate the three exponents by: (5-105)
t(q) = qa(q) - f(a(q)) ,
and taking the derivative with respect to q and using the relationship df(a(q))/da = q gives:
tit(q)
dq
- a +q
da
df
dq
dq
- a.
(5-106)
Equation 5-106 shows that a is the slope of the tangent to the curve r(q) vs. q. f ( a ) is the intercept of that tangent with the r(q) axis and-r(q) is the intercept of this tangent with the f ( a ) axis as demonstrated by Eq. 5-105. These relationships are shown graphically in Fig. 5-86. Muller et al. (1992) gave some advice on calculating a multifractal function. The calculations are carried out for n refinements of coarse-graining, with q ranging usually from qminequal to about-15 to qmaxequal to about + 15 with steps of 0.1. As a suggestion, the investigation of the scaling region in multifractal analysis of reservoir properties should have box sizes of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, and 256 units. With a single fractal dimension, only 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 units should be sufficient.
Multifractal analysis of porous media. One practical application of multifractal scaling of rock microstructure, as discussed above, is the characterization of rock pore systems. As mentioned previously, the relation between porosity and permeability in rocks is a subject of great practical interest. Empirical equations, such as Eqs. 556 through 5-58, attempted to relate various reservoir parameters to permeability. The following discussion is built upon the important concept of very thin slices of rock
413 pore-space. McCauley (1992) pointed out that any photograph or digitized image of a rock's pore-space represents an infinitely thin section of the pore-space. The implications a description of the fractal structure may have on the comprehension of rock fluid flow properties are presented here. Ehrlich and Horkowitz (1984) made one of the earliest attempts to use petrographic image analysis data to study porosity and link some 24 petrographic image analysis variables to permeability. Hansen and Skjeltorp (1988) were the first to apply the box counting technique to digitized rock pore images in order to perform an analysis of random fractal scaling. In their detailed study, they determined the fractal dimensions of the microscopic geometry of rock surfaces (Ds) and of the pore space (D). The results indicated that the values of D s were less than Dv. Hansen and Skjeltorp (1988) stated that this result arises from a 'grain-filling procedure' of the pore space. They conceptualized the procedure as follows" (1) A porous medium can be created by introducing a fraction fl~ of grains with characteristic size L~. (2) The pore volume is then reduced when it is changed from V (initial volume) to /~VO~ (3) Next a fraction f12 of characteristic size L 2 is introduced and the process is repeated until reaching the smallest grain size L n. (4) The total surface area in the rock increases from S to r~§ ~S. ~'i is the fraction of surface area and the {7i} and {fl~} are a function of the grain structures and the packing of each grain size into the system of larger grain sizes (Hansen and Skjeltorp, 1988). The total volume and surface after the filling is expressed as:
V - I i=l fi ~il V~
(5-107)
and
S= I ~ ~1S o
(5-108)
Now the fractal-box counting dimension associated with the pore volume can be estimated. Hansen and Skjeltorp (1988) showed that by covering the pore volume, using Euclidean dimension (E) boxes of length Li, and counting the boxes containing pores space, the number of boxes N i can be calculated:
Ni•
(5-109)
j=l
cdp/S2,
Hansen and Skjeltorp (1988) used Kozeny's equation (k = where c is a rock dependent constant, as a model to study the impact of different fractal dimensions on
414 permeability. The relationship for the specific surface S is expressed by Hansen and Skjeltorp (1988) as follows:
S = So(Ll/Ln )(Ds - Es) + (Ev - Dv).
(5-110)
The rock's surface is covered with Es dimensional squares of the same sizes ( E = 2, the Euclidean dimension). By substituting into the well-known Kozeny equation (k = c~b/S2) the expression for permeability one gets k = c'~) ( L , / Z n ) 2[(Es - Ds) + (Dv - Ev)].
(5-111 )
The dimension Dv is always less than or equal to E v, and Ds is greater than E. Equation 5-111 indicates that permeability has a power-law dependence of D and D . As D s is increased, kr decreases, and as Dv is increased k increases. This is reasonable because D and D reflect the tortuosity of the rock structure (Hansen and Skjeltorp, 1988). Further it is revealed by Eq. 5-111 that the variations in permeability for different fractal dimensions can be large if the ratio (Li/Ln) also is large. Hansen et al. (1988) demonstrated that pore distributions in sedimentary rocks could be distinguished using a plot of f(a) vs. a. Figure 5-87 shows the digitized representations of optical micrographs of thin-sections cut from sandstone core samples collected from two different North Sea oil reservoirs. This approach is a natural s
s
. O,
1.6
v
v
"~ ...k '~.
"|
I
I
1
%
1.2
% % %
r
%
o.e
% %
0.4
0.0 1.5
2.3
3.0 (1
3.8
4.5
2 ~- -'F- m
Fig. 5-87. Results of a multifractal analysis (/(a) vs. a plot) of digitized images indicate that pore distributions are different for the two sandstone thin-sections (shown on the right-hand side). The analysis used the box-counting method. Thin-sections were cut from cores retrieved from two North Sea reservoirs. (After Hansen et al., 1988, fig. 1; reprinted with the permission of Kluwer Academic Publishers.)
415 extension to the previously discussed Katz and Thompson's (1985) use of the Hausdorff-Besicovitch fractal dimension in defining pore geometry. Muller (1992) applied multifractal characterization to samples of oil-bearing chalk, collected from four different North Sea formations, using digitized images. Allochthonous chalk deposits are widespread in the Upper Cretaceous to Lower Paleocene (Danian) rocks of the North Sea (Skovbro, 1983). In the North Sea's Central Graben, commercial oil production is limited to two narrow fairways (Parsley, 1986). Some of the major Norwegian oil fields producing from chalk reservoirs are Ekofisk, Tor, Eldfisk, Albuskjell, and Valhall. Muller (1992, fig. 2) used Eq. 5-94 to generate a plot of log X(q,L) vs. log L. This approach resulted in a linear relationship which illustrated the scaling of the multifractal generating function of the digitized picture for a typical positive value ofq. The measure Pi in Eq. 5-94 is the fraction of pore space area in each box (a box-counting method was used), and N is the number of boxes covering the digitized image. Figure 5-88A shows a typical D(q) multifractal spectrum with error bars for a North Sea chalk sample, and was generated using Eq. 5-97 from 10 different digitized images of the same rock thin-section. The error in the D(q) values increased with q; however, the error is small for q between 0 and 5. Muller (1992) noted that when comparing multifractal spectra of different rock samples one should only concentrate on the D(q) values calculated from these q values. Figure 5-88B displays the multifractal D(q) spectrum of four unidentified North Sea chalk samples. One can only guess from which formations the samples were taken" the most probable candidates are the Ekofisk, Tor, Hod and Hidra formations. The error bars for these samples are of the same order as in Fig. 5-88A (Muller, 1992). All four chalk samples at D(q = 0) have a value close to 2. These four samples have air permeabilities that are different from each other as shown in Fig. 5-88B. The rank order of the multifractal spectra for the different chalk samples changes over the range of q from 0 to 5. Muller (1992) pointed out that the deviation of the D(q > 0) exponents from the D(q = 0) value increases in the order of decreasing permeabilities for rh2 sample (1.8 mD) to rea2 sample (0.6 mD). The rgd9 sample (~ 0.4 mD) does not follow this pattern. Muller (1992) questioned the accuracy of rgd9's measured permeability value. These deviations were attributed by Muller to be related to the degree of clustering of the multifractal measure. Apparently, diagenetic evolution in the North Sea chalk caused a lowering of the chalk's permeability. n
Relationship of multifractal dimensions andpermeability. Before exploring Saucier' s (1992) three-dimensional model, the interrelationships among fractal dimensions, porosity, and permeability are discussed further. Garrison et al. (1992) (see discussion starting on p. 267) considered that reservoir rock/pore systems could be natural fractal objects and modeled as, and compared to, the regular fractals known as the Menger sponge and the Sierpinski carpet. Subsequently, it was shown that the physical properties of porous carbonate rocks are, in part, controlled by the geometry of the pore system. The rate at which a fluid can flow through a carbonate pore system is controlled by the path along which it must travel. Tortuosity is a measure of the length of the fluid path through the rock. The fluid pathway is a subset of the overall geometry of
416
2.2 2.1 2.0 1.0
n W W
O
1.8 1.7 1.I
1.5 -5
5
10
15
9
A 2.0
0
1.9 h
1.8
W
W
a
1.7 1.6
1.5
Fig. 5-88. MultifractalD(q) spectra of North Sea chalk sample rea2. (A) Multifractal spectrum with error bars computed from 10 different pictures of the same rea2 thin-section. (B) Multifractal spectrum of 4 chalk samples taken from different formations in the North Sea reservoirs. (After Muller, 1992, figs. 3 and 4; courtesy of North-Holland.)
417 the pore system. This geometry is described in terms of apparent fractal dimensions determined from pore diameter-number distributions (plots of log N(6), which are the number of holes, vs. log (6), which are the hole diameters: Garrison et al., 1992, p. 382). The distributions contain information about the nature, and number, of multiple fractal pore populations forming the rock/pore system. Garrison et al. (1993b) developed a computer algorithm that allows stochastic modeling of multifractal pore diameter distributions in order to study process relationships. The two cases considered are: (1) those systems having two or more fractal pore populations (processes) with different fractal dimensions, each scaling over a distinct range of lengths, and (2) systems having two or more fractal pore populations with the same fractal dimensions, each scaling over a distinct range of lengths, but with different integral abundances. The algorithm was used successfully by Garrison et al. (1993b) to evaluate and validate the Sierpinski carpet model (refer to discussion starting on p. 267) by being able to simulate: (1) the mixing of two or more of generated stochastic fractal pore diameter distributions, and (2) the alteration of the fractal pore size distributions by allowing a random, but systematic pore size increase and decrease, and coalescence of pores over a range of lengths. Previously, Mazzullo and Chilingarian (1992a) pointed out that there is no one single genetic (mechanical) or diagenetic (chemical) process responsible for forming pore space in carbonate rocks. The algorithm used by Garrison et al. (1993b), however, modified only the diagenetic processes of solution enhancement (increased pore size), cementation and compaction (decreased pore size), and coalescence (dissolution and recrystallization). In this study only a portion of the pores within a selected pore size range were altered. The percent fraction of all the pores in this range was specified a priori. The pores to be altered were selected at random from those pores in the specified range. Garrison et al.'s (1993b) schema contains a function for dual pore selection. The criterion is that "two" pores must be chosen for modeling coalescence. One pore is chosen from the specified size range, and the other is chosen at random from the entire population of pores. Their coalescence procedure used the conditional distribution Pn[~' I ~n)] to select pores to be altered. Pn represents the probability that the nearest neighbors of pores with size 6(n) will have sizes ~'. This nearest neighbor pore relation hypothesis is rough, but satisfies the criterion that the second pore chosen is near the first one chosen. The above approach established a basis for Garrison et al. (1993c) to relate certain fractal dimensions to the flow of fluids through pore space. Their study showed that for natural fractal reservoir rocks, the apparent effective surface fractal dimension D s' and the pore cross-sectional area shape factor S correlate highly with laboratory measured air permeabilities only in the case for process 2 pores. The fractal process with the smallest pore sizes is always referred to by Garrison et al. (1993c) as process 1. Process 1 pores are ineffective in conducting fluid and contribute little to the flow path geometry in the rocks. S was defined by Garrison et al. (1992, p. 387) as the ratio of the cross-sectional area of a non-square hole, either Euclidean or fractal, of diameter ~ to the cross-sectional area of an equivalent Euclidean square hole with the same diameter ~. Their definition takes into consideration the departure of the Sierpinski carpet's hole shape from the Euclidean square.
418 Garrison et al. (1993c) showed that for multifractal rock/pore systems, only the subset of geometry as defined by fractal systems having two or more fractal pore populations with the same fractal dimensions (each scaling over a distinct range of lengths, but with different integral abundances) are highly correlated with air permeability. This correlated fractal process (known as process 2) was designated as the controlling fractal process having the apparent surface fractal dimension Ds'(control) and the area shape factor S control) In Garrison et al ' s (1993c) study, the rock/pore systems have the following characteristics for disjunct singular fractal systems: (
"
.
m
Ds'(control) -- D s' a n d Sa o.t o,, -- S ;
and for multifractal systems: ?
?
Ds ( c o n t r o l )
Ds2 and
"-
S(control)
=
S
2
.
Figures 5-89 and 5-90 present the correlations between D s' and S and measured
- -
--
v
9
l
v
.
v .....
.
.
4
.
.
9
, l 1 .
:3
.
o
o
.
v
.
I
.
1 Q 59H
0 238
I J
Pe
C E
~4
A
9
O
9
O 24 ==..,..,,,.,=.==
9
o~2 o
=,
.
,i
.
.
.
9 Arun Limestone O San Andres Dolomlle -- ~.i
-3
1
.....
9
,&
" '"
~
-
-
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Apparent Fractal Dirnensl0n Ds'
5
Fig. 5-89. Correlation between measured air permeability (core plugs) and mean apparent surface fractal similarity dimension, Ds', for the Arun Limestone (Indonesia) and San Andres Dolomite (west Texas, U.S.A.) samples. Correlation coefficient for the trend is low. Both carbonates are singular disjunct fractal rocks. (After Garrison et al., 1993c, fig. 7; reprinted with the permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.)
419 core plug air permeability for Arun Limestone and San Andres Dolomite samples. There are many data point deviations from the regression line. All samples of both carbonates have disjunct singular fractal rock/pore systems (refer to p. 271). This is in contrast to the two sandstones studied by Garrison et al. (1993c), which exhibit multifractal rock/pore systems. By excluding pathologic samples, a better data correlation can be obtained for both the carbonates and sandstones (Figs. 5-91 and 592). A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis of various fractal characteristics identified by Garrison et al. (1993, tables 1 to 4) was performed using 52 nonpathologic carbonate and sandstone data points. Based on the results of this analysis, only Ds'(contro]) and Sa(control) are required to account for all of the variability in measured core plug air permeability (k, mD). From these data, an empirical equation was determined by Garrison et al. (1993c) to be: (5-112)
log(k) = -1.699 - 0.616Ds'(control) + 113.287Sa(control).
A plot of measured core plug permeability against the permeability calculated by Eq. 5-112 is shown in Fig. 5-93.
V
~.
I
2
y = 14.368x - 3.526 J r 2 = 0.722 28078
28067
9
8
~
1
~5
&2H
oal O8
0 O
E ._~-1
4~
O14 O 28142 024
i
'~-2 m
9 Arun Llmeston~ O San Andres Dolomite
o
. . . . . . .
,,|
,
-3 .1
.15 .2 .25 .3 .35 .4 .45 Pore Area S h a p e Factor S a
.5
Fig. 5-90. Correlation between measured air permeability (core plugs) and pore area shape factor S a for the singular disjunct fractal Arun Limestone (Indonesia) and San Andres Dolomite (west Texas, U.S.A.) samples. As in Fig. 5-89, the correlation coefficient for the trend is low. (After Garrison et al., 1993c, fig. 8; reprinted with the permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.)
420
,ram
'
"v
-v
~
v
y = ~.979x
~ e
O~
e
v
v,
9 2.619
r 2 = 0.642
2
o
:3
(D 4)
,,
,,
1
immq
~.
v
........
@ e @e
0
E A
r v
9 Norphlet Sandstone i Spraberry Sandstone Arun Llmestone San Andres Dolomlle
..Ir
O~-2
O ..J
_
-3
"
0
.5
I I I I II II
__
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Ds'(control)
5
Fig. 5-91. Plot of measured air permeability (core plugs) vs. Ds'(controt) for the pores of the controlling process in selected samples oftheArun Limestone (Indonesia), SanAndres Dolomite (west Texas, U.S.A.), Norphlet Sandstone (offshore Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.), and Spraberry Sandstone (west Texas, U.S.A.). Correlation coefficient for the trend is low. (After Garrison et al., 1993c, fig. 9; reprinted with the permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.)
The straight line in this figure represents a line of perfect correlation with a data point scatter about this line with a correlation of r 2 = 0.950. The equation suggests that D s' and S are simple, concise, quantitative descriptors of pore geometry and are independent of rock composition and texture. The writers believe this approach holds promise; however, several obstacles have to be resolved. First, more variety in the carbonate rock samples is needed in order to validate these fractal dimensionpermeability correlations. Second, the genetic component needs to be evaluated, inasmuch as it will involve on the whole the simple and disjunct component of carbonate rocks. Third, a way will have to be found to mathematically account for the nonrepresentative samples that exhibit large deviations from the "norm" (Figs. 5-89 and 5-90). Fourth, data point deviation for selected samples in the fractal dimension control scenario (Figs. 5-91 and 5-92) appear to be no better than the classical prediction methods. Lastly, when Figs. 5-89 to 5-92 are compared to previously presented examples of fractal analysis, the data point scatter around the trend lines is questionable. These issues will have to be resolved before Garrison et al.'s (1992, 1993a--c) permeability correlation results can be used effectively in carbonate reservoir performance modeling.
421
ol :3
y = 18.312x - 4.49 r 2 = 0.752
2
~.
e
k.,
e OE]
o O :3
0
e
G)
O
E
co
I
9 Norphlet Sandstone II Spmberry Sandstone O Arun Umestone E] San Andre$ Oolomlte
o "3
~
19
.15
.2
-
.25
.3
.35
.4
S a (control)
Fig. 5-92. Plot of measured air permeability (core plugs) vs. Sa(control) (the mean area shape factor of the cross-sectional area of pores in fractal process controlling fluid flow) in selected samples of the Arun Limestone (Indonesia), San Andres Dolomite (west Texas, U.S.A.), Norphlet Sandstone (offshore Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.), and Spraberry Sandstone (west Texas, U.S.A.). Correlation coefficient for the trend is low. (After Garrison et al., 1993c, fig. 10; reprinted with the permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.)
Modeling of effective permeability in multifractal (nonlacunar fractal) porous media Now the discussion returns to the application of the real space renormalization group (RSRG) method. Saucier (1992) showed theoretically how to calculate the scaling exponents of the effective absolute permeability in multifractal porous media using the RSRG method. As described previously, the permeability field is renormalized (also known as homogenization) before the fluid flow equation is solved directly by numerical methods. FRACTAM, also discussed previously on page 388, is an example of homogenization (Fig. 5-76). Saucier (1992) pointed out that this procedure allows the generation of effective permeabilities k(L) at any scale L, where L is the mesh-size length of the grid. The structure of the permeability field determines the dependence of k(L) on L. King (1989) related that if the permeability field is an uncorrelated noise, then k(L) converges rapidly to a constant value as L approaches infinity. This means that the renormalized permeability field is constant at large scale. In the case of correlated permeability fields, these fields can be variable even after homogenization (Saucier, 1992). The variance of k(L) can remain large even for large L values. Saucier (1992)
422
Permeability Calculated from Fractal Dimension and Shape Factor 3 O)
2
r 2 = 0.950 = _+ Iog(1.714)
N=52 O o
0
1
~o I L
(/)
0
E A L _ -V
=,,
, - , ,
9 Norphlet Sandstone II Spraberry Sandstone O Arun Limestone E] San Andre$ Dolomlte
r
0"2
..J
,
,
,
,
,
-3 -3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Log[ k (calculated)]
Fig. 5-93. Relationship between measured air permeability (core plugs) and calculated air permeability using Eq. 5-112 for selected samples of the Arun Limestone (Indonesia), San Andres Dolomite (west Texas, U.S.A.), Norphlet Sandstone (offshore Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.), and Spraberry Sandstone (west Texas, U.S.A.). A good correlation coefficient exists for the trend. (After Garrison et al., 1993c, fig. 12; reprinted with the permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc.)
pointed out that a realistic modeling of reservoir properties at large scales requires a minimum definition of the variability of the poorly defined permeability field. He proposed that it is sensible to make the simplest and most natural assumptions as possible when considering poorly-known property distributions in reservoirs. Mandelbrot (1982) argued that structures involving self-similarity are among the simplest ones, and that they can often provide qualitatively reasonable approximations for many irregular geophysical fields.
Multifractal permeability fields. As discussed previously in the review of Garrison and his colleagues' work, it is possible that real permeability fields in carbonate and sandstone reservoirs can be characterized as being correlated and anisotropic owing to the nature of their sedimentation process (fluid flow and gravitational effects) and subsequent diagenetic modifications. Saucier (1992) noted that multifractal permeability fields are among the simplest correlated structures having no characteristic length scale. These fields, therefore, provide a good starting point for the study of
423 flow through inhomogeneous porous media, such as in carbonate rocks. The reader is referred to Hentschel and Procaccia (1983), Halsey et al. (1986), and Tremblay and Tremblay (1992) for an in-depth discussion of correlation lengths for multifractals. Saucier (1992) examined the scale dependence of the effective absolute permeability of both deterministic and random multifractal permeability fields and expanded King's (1989) two-dimensional model to three-dimensions. The three-dimensional structure of a reservoir's permeability field is poorly known owing to sparse information from widely-spaced well records. Well-site geology, two-dimenional seismic data, and well testing provide only rough guidelines to carbonate reservoir porosity and permeability trends, stratification, heterogeneity sizes, and structures. Renormalization equations, however, derived for the effective permeability, allow the linking of the statistics of the effective permeability field at the core scale to the statistics at the macroscale. King's (1989) main idea is that the permeability values are distributed on a D-dimensional cubic grid. The grid blocks, all having the same volume, are then grouped into blocks of 2 D and the effective permeability of each group is assigned to a new coarser grid as was shown in Fig. 5-81. The effective permeability of a cubic group of 2 D blocks is defined by Darcy's law, assuming that the pressure is uniform along both vertical boundaries and the horizontal boundaries of the block are impermeable (Fig. 5-94) (Saucier, 1992). Figure 5-95 illustrates an equivalent circuit for the model shown in Fig 5-94. Four 2 Dresistor crosses have been hooked together. The
k2
kl FI
P=O
OW
P=Z~P
k5
k4
impermeable boundary
L
Fig. 5-94. Boundary conditions used for the calculation of effective permeability of a group of 2 D cubic blocks. (After Saucier, 1992, fig. 2; courtesy of Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.)
424
11 ]............. ~:~ ~ ~! [I..... 1-~:~2 .... ..........i
. . . .
. . . . . . . .
~.............. "
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
Fig. 5-95. An equivalent circuit schematic is obtained when four crosses are linked together with constant pressure (voltage) on both sides. Around each node, labelled 1, 2, 3 and 4, the value of each of the four resistors enclosed in the dotted square is 89k i. If the medium was anisotropic, then the resistances on the horizontal and vertical arms of the resistor cross would have different values. Refer to Fig. 5-82. (After Saucier, 1992, fig. 4; courtesy of Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.)
equivalent resistance between the midpoints of the edges is 1/k. For D-dimensional space it is 1 / k L D - 2, where L is the characteristic length of the block and that the viscosity ( ~ ) = 1 (Saucier, 1992). In the region of the reservoir space where the permeability is non-zero, the permeability field can be covered with a regularly-spaced cubic grid of mesh 6. For the case of a multifractal permeability field, Saucier (1992) proposed that this field can be characterized by the behavior of its multifractal generating function X q(5). A multifractal permeability field is defined by studying the cumulants or order q of ,tt{Si(6)} : L((~)-
.~[~t{Bi(~)}]q ,
1
(5-113)
where on a grid each D-dimensional cube of size 6 is denoted by B(6) and #B(6) is, therefore, the sum of the permeabilities of all the grid blocks contained in the region of the reservoir under consideration. It is possible to relate the scaling behavior of X ( 5 ) with 6 for different values of the moments of order q with the multifractual spectrum. The generating function for multifractal fields exhibits a scaling behavior over a wide range of scales and can be expressed as: L(6)
_ ~ x(q),
(5-114)
where in general, the mass exponents r ( q ) are a standard probabilistic tool representing measures, called cumulant generating function. This function (r(q)) depends nonlinearly on q.
425 The scaling properties of the effective absolute permeability of multifractal permeability fields is explored for two constructions (deterministic and random cases) using multiplicative processes.
Deterministic permeability fields. In the deterministic case (properties are measurable at any point), Saucier (1992) showed that the effective permeability k(6) of a region of size 6 centered about a point x was found to scale according to" k(~)-~ ~(x)-v,
(5-115)
where a(6) is the local point-wise scaling exponent of the permeability field, a is commonly known as the local singularity strength, and ), is an exponent determined by the weights used in the multiplicative process. One impact of multifractals has been the study of turbulence, where it was found that local dissipation of kinetic energy in experimental one-dimensional cuts of fully developed turbulence can be described by a simple multifractal spectrum (Muller et al., 1992). Following this approach, Saucier (1992) constructed a multifractal field using a multiplicative process, such as the multifractal cascade model (Fig. 5-96) for
t
I r=L
I-
It
i-
~., '
{I
I~
' I
r=
|
r :
L
L
I
I I I a,.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~, .
.
.
.
.
r=q
Fig. 5-96. One-dimensional version of a cascade model of eddies. Each eddy breaks down into two new ones. The flux of kinetic energy to smaller scales is divided into nonequal fractions Pl and P2. This cascade terminates when the eddies are of the size of the Kolmogorov scale, rl. (After Meneveau and Sreenivasan, 1987, fig. 3; reprinted with the permission of the American Physical Society.)
426
n=O
8o=1
wl
w2
81 - 112
n=l w3
w4
wlwl
wlw2
~I
wlw3
wlw4
~
~4
w3wl
w3vv2
w4wl
w4w2
w3w3
v~w4
w4w3
w4w4
52 = 1/4
n=2
Fig. 5-97. First two steps of construction of a deterministic multifractal two-dimensional permeability field from top to bottom. (After Saucier, 1992, fig. 5; courtesy of Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.) turbulence presented by Meneveau and Sreenivasan (1987, 1989). This model reproduces the flux of energy from larger to smaller scales in turbulent fluid flow. Figure 5-97 illustrates the first two steps (n = 2) in the construction process for the two-dimensional permeability field. The multifractal permeability field can be characterized by the behavior of its generating function Xq(fi) and is defined by using Eq. 5-113. The summation extends over all the cubes in covering of the field. In Fig. 5-97, the unit cube B(6o) of size rio is shown to be divided into 2 D identical cubes B (i) (ill) of size fi~ = fio/2 (here Saucier used tim = fio2-m) 9Each of the sub-cubes has an assigned weight w i, i = 1, . . . . 2 D (the process involves 2 D weights w i >_ 0, i, . . . . 2D).
427 The process is repeated on each subcube: B(i)(61) is divided into 2D cubes of size 62, which were assigned the weights wiw~;j = 1 , . . . S a 2 ~. Saucier (1992) stated that this process is continued n times down scale until a scale 5, = 2-" is reached. 6 is known as the homogeneity or inner scale and is where the permeability field becomes homogeneous. For simplicity, Saucier chose this example of the multiplicative process to be conservative, that is, the total measure is conserved in the construction by imposing on the weights the constraint S,w~= 1. This implies that p{B(5o)} remains equal to unity at each cascade step and the measure of a cube B(Sm) takes the form: ri
u{B(6m)} = w(a,) w ( a 9 . . . W(~m) ,
(5-116)
where W(6k) denotes a multiplier at 6k (W(fik) can be equal to any of the 2 ~ values of w~). Different strings of multipliers w(5~) w(fiz) . . . W(~m) correspond, therefore, to different cubes B(6~) (Saucier, 1992, p. 386). Figure 5-98 shows a permeability field obtained by Saucier after 7 cascade steps with a two-dimensional multiplicative process. It should be noted that the construction is composed of a Sierpinski gasket pattern, which is based on the contraction mapping defined by Eq. 5-116. Demko et al. (1985) reviewed the feasibility of using iterated function systems (IFS) in computer generated graphics to geometrically model and render two- and three-dimensional fractal objects, such as the Sierpinski gasket and carpet.
Fig. 5-98. Sierpinski gasket generated from a two-dimensional permeability field constructed with 7 cascade steps and 4 different weights (w I = 0.35, w 2 = 0.05, w3 = 0.15, w4 = 0.45). Dark areas represent regions of low permeability, whereas the bright areas are regions of high permeability. The pattern represents a multifractal adaptation of a uniform Cantor set having different weights (multipliers). (After Saucier, 1992, fig. 6; courtesy of Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.)
428 Saucier (1992) also studied the effective permeability of the deterministic multifractal permeability field as a function of scale. He posed the following questions: "Given a cubic ball B(fi) of size 6 centered on a point x, how does the effective permeability of the medium enclosed in Bx(6") vary with 6 when x is fixed? .... How does it vary if 6 is fixed but when x varies?" Saucier's solution is similar to that of Eq. 5-116. The permeabilities at the homogeneity scale fin are designated by/6,, ) (Sn), V = 1, 2 , . . . , N(n), where N(n) = 2 nD. The effective permeability of the porous medium contained in Bx(Sm) is kn(fim) for a permeability field constructed with n steps (fi = 2-m and m < n). Referring to Fig. 5-85F, all the kn(Sn) contained in Bx(~n) share a string of common multipliers w ( f i , ) . . . W(~m). The permeabilities at the homogeneity scale (6n) are expressed as: (v) k(~n)
= w((~l) . . .
W(~m)k~V_m ' (~n_m) ,
(5-117)
(v)
where v = 1 , 2 , . . . , N ( n - m), and k_m(~n_m) are the permeabilities at the homogeneity scale generated by the same multiplicative process, but with only n - m cascade steps. Saucier's (1992) conceptual model shown in Fig. 5-85F is of the one-dimensional multiplicative process (D = 1) having four cascade steps and two different weights w~ and w 2. The permeability field enclosed by the horizontal bracket has an inner scale ((54 = ( 89 All the permeability values in this interval share the same multipliers at scales fi, and fie SO that w(fi,) = w2 and W((~2) = W 1. The permeabilities in the horizontal bracket can be expressed by the form: (v)
(v)
k,( fi2) w( fi,)w( fi2)k2( fi2) ,
(5-118) (v) where k4(82) is a permeability generated by only the part of the cascade process indicated by the vertical brackets, i.e., with only two cascade steps (Saucier, 1992, p. 390). The general equation where kn(fio) is the effective permeability of the whole permeability field constructed with n cascade steps is derived from Eq. 5-118: =
k(~m) -- js
} k _ m((~o) 9
(5-119)
Saucier (1992) showed that kn(~o) could be determined by using a recurrence relation between kn+ ,(rio) and kn(6o). The conceptual model for his approach is illustrated in Fig. 5-99. A two-dimensional permeability field -~n was constructed with n cascade steps. By rescaling and rearranging permeability values, a new effective permeability field ~n + 1 was created. The approach in constructing .~, § consists of: (1) constructing 2 D copies of ~n and scaling them down by a factor of 89(Fig. 599a); (2) multiplying all the permeabilities k(n) (fin) at the homogeneity scale fin by w i for each copy (# i, i = 1 , . . . , 2D); (3) arranging the new fields in a 2 D array with the same spatial order as the w ~sin ' the multiplicative process yielding a new permeability field "qn§ with n + 1 cascade steps (Fig. 5-99b); and
429
kn(1)
kn(1)
Xl/2 kn(1)
A
-
kn(1)
w+ kn(1)
w2
kn(1)
kn(1)
B w3 kn(1)
w4 k.(1 )
RSRG
kn, l(1)
C
Fig. 5-99. A two-dimensional permeability field constructed with n cascade steps. (A) Four copies of the permeability field (3n) are produced and scaled down by a factor of 89 (B) For each copy #i, i = 1, 2, 3, 4, all the values of permeabilities are multiplied by w~ to create the new effective permeabilities, and then arranged in a 2 x 2 array resulting in a new permeability field 3 n § l = 1 , constructed with n + 1 cascade steps. ( C ) - The real space renormalization group method is used to compute the new effective permeability according to k, +1= g(Wlk,(1), w2kn(1), w3k.(1), w4kn(1)). (After Saucier, 1992, fig. 8; courtesy of Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.)
430 (4) by using the RSRG method (Fig. 5-99c) to compute the effective permeability according to"
o f ~ n + 1'
k+
1(~o) --
f(Wl,W2,....
, WN(1))k(l~o) ,
(5-120)
which is a simple renormalization equation for the effective permeability kn(fio) (Saucier, 1992, p. 391). Iterating Eq. 5-120, setting ko(fio) = 1, and eliminating n using fin = 2-n results in: kn(fio) = finr,
(5-121)
where the scaling exponent y = - l o g 2 (f(w 1,w2 , . . . . ,wN(I) )) " Equation 5-121 shows that the effective permeability of the whole permeability field scales with the inner scale fin, and y is determined by the function f and by the 2 Dweights wj. Saucier (1992) stated that for multifractal measures a pointwise scaling exponent a(x) is usually defined such that p {Bx(fi) } ~ fi~ (x) as ~; --->0 (Halsey et al., 1986). If the inner scale fi is finite, this statement is expressed as" P{Bx(b-)} ~ fia(x),
(5-122)
when fin ~ fi ~ rio, and Eq. 5-119 becomes: a (x) - ~,
kn(6m) 6m
(5-123)
by using Eqs. 5-121 and 5-122, and fin- m = ~n/~m' when fin <
Random multifractalpermeabilityfields. Saucier (1992) expanded on the conservative multiplicative process showing how the random multiplicative process can also be constructed. Random permeability variations are expected for blocks of porous medium coming from different locations within the reservoir. In the random case, the permeability k(fi) is a scale-dependent random variable that is proportional to and satisfies the relationship: <[k(6)]q
> ,~ ~ D +t(q)-~,(q)
(5-124)
where < > denotes the averages over many samples of [ k ( 6 ) ] q, v(q) is the order-q exponent of the multifractal permeability field and y(q) is another nonlinear function determined by the joint probability distribution of the weights used in the multiplicative
431 process (Saucier, 1992). (The reader should refer to Figs. 5-85F and 5-99 for additional information and visual representations of the weights used in this procedure.) The transport properties are determined by the multifractal spectrum of the permeability field (Eq. 5-124). Saucier (1992) pointed out that in reservoir modeling, Eq. 5124 relates the variance of the permeabilities measured at the core scale to the variance of the effective permeabilities at the grid block scale used in the flow simulators. A proper description of the scaling properties of the permeability field in carbonate reservoirs is necessary in order to generate realistic effective permeabilities, and consequently, to predict with greater accuracy the large-scale flow through the rocks. Random variations in the permeability field are expected in core samples coming from different parts of a reservoir. The effective permeability k(L) at scale L can be regarded as a random variable that depends on a length scale parameter L (Saucier, 1992). In order to characterize the random variations of k(L) by the scaling behavior of its moments, one considers the quantities <[k(L)]q > as a function of L and the real parameter q. Saucier (1992) showed that for random multifractal permeability fields these moments satisfy: < [ k ( Z ) ] q > ,~, Z ~(q) ,
(5-125)
where ~(q) is a nonlinear function of q. Saucier's approach is twofold: (1) to derive an expression of ~(q) using the RSRG method, and (2) to adapt the formalism used to derive the effective permeability of deterministic multifractal permeability fields to random multifractal fields. The permeability fields for the deterministic case generated with the random multiplicative described by Eq. 5-114, and starting with Eq. 5-117, resulted in the following equation: k (6)
= w ( 6 , ) . . . W(
)kn_m(6o).
(5-126)
The random version of Eq. 5-126 is simply: d
kn(6m) =
w(6~)... W(6m)kn_m(6o),
(5-127)
d
where = stands for equality in probability distribution, and k m(6O)is a random variable independent of the W(fk)'s, where W signifies the weights in the random multifractal permeability fields. By raising Eq. 5-127 to the power q and averaging yields: <[k(t~m)]q > = < mq > m < [ k _ m(~o)] q >.
(5-128)
Pursuing the same logic and iteration as in his derivation for the deterministic case, Saucier arrived at the following simple renormalization equation for the moments of the effective permeability: <
> -
w , < , ) ] q > n <[ko(6o)]q >.
(5-129)
432 Employing ko(~o) = 1, and eliminating n with ~n = 2-n yields: ~(q) <[kn(6o)] q> = "n ,
(5-130)
where the scaling exponent ~q)=-log2(<[f(W~,W2, . . . . , WN~l))]q>).Compare Eq. 5130 with Eq. 5-121 for the deterministic case. By eliminating m in Eq. 5-128 with ~m = 2-m, using the relationship for the mass exponents r(q) = - D - 1og2(< Wq >), replacing Eq. 5-130 in this resulting expression, and using ~n-m = ~n/~mresults in an equation comparable to the deterministic Eq. 5-123" D + t(q)- ~(q) ?(q)
<[k(~m)lq> = ~m
~n"
(5-131)
Saucier (1992) states that Eq. 5-131 appears to be the first analytical derivation of the effective permeability of random multifractal permeability fields. The relation between the scaling exponents of the effective permeability, as defined by Eq. 5-125, is" ~(q) - D + v(q)- ~(q).
(5-132)
A multiscaling permeability field, therefore, gives rise to a multiscaling effective permeability field. Saucier (1992) commented that the mass exponents r(q) determined directly, but not completely, the permeability scaling exponents ~(q). He further stated that the permeability exponents ~(q) are not trivially related to the mass exponents r(q), because f is a non-linear function. Equations 5-115 and 5-124 are approximate results derived with the real space renormalization group method (Saucier, 1992). Measuring both r(q) and ~q) requires three-dimensional information about the permeability field (Saucier, 1992). This is a disadvantage to this method. Three-dimensional data usually are not available, inasmuch as most of the data come from wells that are one-dimensional vertical cuts through the reservoir. Saucier (1992) recognized that recovering three-dimensional information from one-dimensional cuts is a nontrivial problem. It has been shown in this chapter that information involving the anisotropy, stratification, and heterogeneity of carbonate reservoir properties is necessary to characterize the reservoir. If the permeability field was locally isotropic, or if the anisotropy could in some way be characterized, then there could be an effective solution to this problem. The role of anisotropy in fluid flow through porous carbonate rocks and the ability to extract information about anisotropy from one-dimensional cuts are the kernels to effective carbonate reservoir characterization and ability to increase productivity. Fractal reservoirs
The concept of fractal reservoirs has appeared in the recent literature (Chang and Yortsos, 1990; Beier, 1990; Chakrabarty et al., 1993). This term could lead to confusion and might not be appropriate, inasmuch as all reservoirs can be shown to contain properties that were described as fractal. Chang and Yortsos (1990) defined a fractal reservoir as consisting of a fracture network embedded in a Euclidean object (matrix). They envisioned such a reservoir as containing brittle and highly fractured rocks,
433 with fracture scales ranging from centimeters to micrometers. Using this concept, it is apparent that carbonate reservoirs can be classified as fractal reservoirs. Barton and Larsen (1985) first showed that complex two-dimensional fracturetrace networks can be described quantitatively using fractal geometry. Open-fracture networks are the primary avenues of transport for oil and gas through the reservoir's matrix. In contrast to fracture flow, matrix flow generally is significant only for very low transport rate values. Fracture flow dominates matrix flow in carbonate reservoirs owing to fracture permeabilities being up to 7 orders of magnitude greater than matrix permeabilities. Velde et al. (1991) showed that different failure modes, consisting of shear, tension and compressional relaxation, can give different fractal relations. The reader is referred to Chang and Yortsos (1990) and Acuna and Yortsos (1991) for further applications of fractal geometry to flow simulation in networks of fractures. The classical approach to determining the nature of fractured carbonate reservoirs and their properties are stressed in the present two volumes.
Concluding remarks In reservoir analyses, fluid-flow simulation results are used extensively as reservoir performance predictions upon which to base economics for reservoir management decisions (Bashore et al., 1993). It was shown in this section that the analysis of the productivity of carbonate reservoirs in the near future will be based on geostatistical measures when "good" reservoir geological and geophysical data, computational time, and the expertise are readily available to the operator. Creating an improved characterization of carbonate reservoirs helps to predict and decipher productivity problems. A basic assumption is that geological properties can be regarded as regionalized variables that are distributed in space and have an underlying structure in their apparent irregularity. Knowledge about fractal scaling exponents obtained from bivariant statistical methods is used in reservoir characterization as described in the above discussions. Geostatistical interpolation using kriging with a fractal variogram is a technique that regards the reservoir-property distribution as a random function. The random function is defined by a spatial law, which describes how similar values drawn from different locations will be a function of their spatial separation (Hewett and Behrens, 1990). The property distributions will have a prescribed spatial correlation structure (fractal model) and matched measured property values at the sampling points. Muller et al. (1992) made a very strong case for the use of multifractal scaling, rather than employing fractal scaling exponents obtained from bivariant statistical methods. Multifractal statistics gives both moments and correlations. By knowing the multifractal spectrum one can compute all moments at all length scales for which the scaling holds, offering a wealth of statistical information. Multifractals provide a powerful tool for the characterization of irregular signals (Muller et al., 1992). Geostatistical methods of preparing the reservoir property distributions for use in reservoir performance simulations involves scaling-up of the data and scaling within the simulator. The scaling-up procedure of a grid is diagramatically shown in Fig. 5100. At present, properties such as permeability at the interwell scale are being predicted using these advanced numerical techniques involving fractals and multifractals.
434
13
C Fig. 5-100. Successive scale-up (coarsening) procedure used in grid simulation models. (A)- Fine-grid model, representingsmall-scalereservoir-flowheterogeneities.(B) - Replacementof the fine-scaleblocks by a single-grid block at the medium scale after the effective properties were generated at the fine-grid scale. (C)- Coarse-grid reservoir model representing the fine- and medium-grid models. Saucier's (1992) study revealed that the multifractal scaling of a permeability field implies that the scaling of effective permeability can be generated by deterministic and random multiplicative processes (refer to Eqs. 5-115 and 5-124, respectively). Both equations give only approximate results with the real space renormalization group method. The effective transport properties of porous media are determined, via Eq. 5-124, by the multifractal spectrum of the permeability field. Scaling properties measured on the permeability field along wells at the core-plug scale can be used to predict the statistics, such as the variance, of effective permeabilities at larger scales in carbonate reservoirs. One can only hope that in the next five years the petroleum industry will have the ability to directly generate large-scale descriptions of a carbonate reservoir using multifractals. Lastly, it should be remembered that modeling does not have to produce an exact geologic numerical model, but rather, the flow-simulation only has to deliver resuits similar to the output of production data. If modeling forecasts do not match
435 future field performance data, then the operator needs to look not only at the geostatistical model and the application limits described by Perez and Chopra (1991), Gray et al. (1993) and Mesa and Poveda (1993), but also at production practices and equipment.
LABORATORY AND FIELD CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBONATE RESERVOIRS
The writers have taken the reader in this chapter from the basic descriptions of carbonate reservoirs to conceptual models, and finally to numerical models. Now, the focus will be on some methods of identifying, measuring, and evaluating microscopicand mesoscopic-scale heterogeneities (Fig. 5-37) in carbonate reservoir rocks using laboratory and field tests. The analysis of reservoir samples, such as fluids, rock cuttings and cores, involves procedures that can be complex and contain many stages between the reservoir and the final measurements and interpretation. Quality control in reservoir sampling, testing, and data analysis will help to ensure valid data as input into the economic prediction of performance. Such quality control procedures in core analysis were discussed by Heaviside and Salt (1988).
Laboratory~outcrop characterization of heterogeneity Carbonate reservoirs with large permeability contrasts are common and are difficult to evaluate in the outcrop and laboratory. Flow heterogeneity in laboratory core samples of carbonate rocks can significantly influence the experimental measurement of fluid flow and displacement characteristics used in evaluating oil recovery methods. There has been a great deal of speculation as to the influence of variations in pore size, shape, and degree of connectivity on oil recovery processes in carbonates. Also, a great deal of thought has been given to the interpretation of carbonate reservoir performance data. Previously, the only alternatives to using laboratory models and their generated test data was the extrapolation of primary recovery data obtained by partially depleting a field, or obtaining production information from pilot texts. As shown here, employing numerical models is another viable method, especially if the models can tie together reservoir properties and petrophysical data from outcrop studies. Conventional laboratory methods used in core analysis of carbonate rocks were discussed in Chapter 3. It has been recognized that predictions of reservoir performance based on displacement tests using small-diameter carbonate core samples (same size as sandstone cores) can often be misleading. This is due to the improbability of obtaining a representative sample in such small-diameter samples. Special core analysis using novel techniques such as petrographic image analysis from thin-sections, minipermeameter, and computerized tomographic scans appear to be one way to characterize anisotropic carbonates in the laboratory. The application of petrographic image analysis to generate fractal and multifractal characterizations of carbonate rocks was discussed in the previous section. A key to the usefulness of these applications is to tie their results into carbonate reservoir models, thereby improving the ability to forecast production.
436
Minipermeameter application The first documented use of an apparatus to measure local permeabilities was by Dykstra and Parsons (1950), followed by Morineau et al. (1965). Eijpe and Weber (1971) employed a minipermeameter to measure air permeabilities of consolidated rock and unconsolidated sand. The minipermeameter is a rapid and non-destructive method of measuring permeabilities in situ or using core samples. Goggin et al. (1988) performed a theoretical and experimental analysis of minipermeameter response, which included gas slippage and high-velocity flow effects. The minipermeameter (mechanical field permeameter) gauges gas-flow rates and pressure drop by pressing an injection tip against a smooth rock surface. The gas flow rate and tip pressure measurements of the minipermeameter are converted through the use of a shape factor depending only on an elliptical tip having different shape factor values and sample geometry. Determination of permeability anisotropy on a core plug was performed by Young (1989) using Goggin et al.'s (1988) permeameter. Jones (1994) described the development of a non-steady state probe (mini)-permeameter. A steady-state minipermeameter was modified by removing the flow controller and adding reservoirs of different calibrated volumes. The time rate of pressure decay as nitrogen flowed from any one or all of these reservoirs through the probe and into the rock sample yields a direct measure of the permeability. Time to measure permeability was reduced from 20 min per sample to around 35 sec (Jones, 1994). Caution must be expressed in using this permeameter to obtain accurate measurements of permeability in vuggy carbonates, carbonates with abundant moldic porosity, and/or microfractures. As Grant et al. (1994) pointed out, these conditions would violate the regular gas flow path geometry. The application of the "field" permeameter is useful for capturing fine-scale heterogeneity patterns in carbonate rocks lacking fracture and abundant vug porosity. Two separate field case studies employing a field permeameter are presented. These cases show the utility of using field-measured permeability data in statistical flow models to account for carbonate reservoir heterogeneity. Lawyer Canyon test site, New Mexico, U.S.A. Chevron Petroleum Technology Company (Grant et a1.,1994) and the Texas Bureau of Economic Geology (Senger et al., 1991; Kittridge et al., 1990) applied the mechanical field permeameter to the study of vertical and lateral spatial permeability variations in a continuous outcrop of the San Andres Formation on the Algerita Escarpment in the Guadalupe Mountains, Otero County, southeastern New Mexico, U.S.A. (Fig. 5-101A) Two broad goals of their studies were: (1) To establish a geologic framework for a reservoir model, which was compared by Kittridge et al. (1990) to the Wasson Field located some 140 miles (225 km) to the northeast in the Midland basin of west Texas, U.S.A. The regional geologic setting and correlation between the numerous San Andres/Grayburg reservoirs are poorly understood. Such correlations are important inasmuch as the reservoirs of the San Andres and overlying Grayburg Formations have a combined cumulative production of 7.7 billion bbl of oil (Grant et al., 1994). (2) To conceptualize a reservoir model and use this model as a basis for studying the results of hypothetical waterflood simulations and reservoir flow. These studies addressed the influence of lithofacies in the prediction of San Andres
O
o
(!" I > tu
~_%, 9..._
Loc~ro
o o
' . 11: , : :h. . : : .~ :.......::...: i .... ' fill::! :Ei~..:~::::
::::::::::::::::::::::
ii:'i:~i.~ii:i:~:~i:.:;-~i.:i~i~:~:i~i~~!ii!!~i~:~:'~!:~, ....~
~
9 :,iiiii!ii!i!!ii!!ili!!':::,::ii~ii!',ii'~i~,',iiiiiiiiiiiiii~:~. ',',',: ; ;;
r~ ~ ' ~ _ ~ " ~bll~i
A
i i_i"_~~_~__~j_L __-'
. ~ f
~ . ~ . i i
....... " i ~ "~=. . . . . . . i ~ "o i
'
i
~m_I
z
-
.
7
.
=
~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
........ .~.-.-.-.-.-.-.-..:
San And . . . . . d Grayburg (undivided) Undifferentiated basin facies
~o ~,~,
m
8
,oo13o O-x-O
]
1000 DEPOSITAL FACIES (FLOW UNITS) ~ F I o o d e d shelf, tidal shelf (1) [-'-'] Shallow shelf II (5)
0
.
,
.................................. -:..l!!!!~:!~:!i!!!iiiiiiii~::ii::ili ............ :
~
0
2000 M D
.
Bar flank (9)
1 ~ Shallow shelf II (6) ~ accreticrest on'Bar setsbar(10) 1"7;171Shallow shell I, Shallow shelf II, bar crest, bar top (7) ~ 1 Bar crest (11) ~ S h a l l o w shell II, bar top (4) ~ Shallow shelf II, bar crest, bar accretion sets (8)
1000
~
,t
300
Grainstone (10 - 100 m)
[-']Shallow shelf I (2) L---]Shallow shelf I (3) S
~ ~ I'~
...... .....
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ......~ ! i : i i ~ - : ' ~ i ~ i ; ' - ....... 17-~"':':':':...............
o
0
[---"7San Andres
----:----- ......... -
60
....
. . . . . .
ft . . . . . . . . .
Carlsbad
. ~ ~ . . _~1 ~, e [~.:iiiiiii?ii!;ii!i:: ~ '.:: ~~i.!ii!!i;ii!ii!iii!i!;!iiiii?ii;i# " 1 CapitanandGoatSeep _r ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ii~i~:~:~:::::i:i!ii~i~iiii~]/ ----~',,~~ \':::I~i:,iili';i~ ~ i ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i~~). Artesia Grou p (undivided ~ " ~ ! i i ~ ~ . ~ " ~ excluding Grayburg) '~: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~/7.. Orou,,,,.,,n.,:,,v,.,:,e,:,,
:tEXAS
~
::::::":':" ":':....
~ !w
NE~sIGC)~m/~I~,~~__~.j
,~0
:..... :
i:i:i:iii!!~!:':" ": :i?.<:
:'~'~,.:' :::" "::F :ii:~ ~i :: :::. '.:: . . . . :: : : : : ~ : . ' :-:-:-:-: :-:-:':-:':':......
600 m
D
D
Grain dominated packstone (1-10 m)
Mud dominated pack wackestone (< 1.0 m) Tight mudstone fenestral caps (< 1.0 m)
Separate vug grainstone (1 - 10 m)
C
200Q fl
.,
E]
Parasequencenumber
Fig. 5- 101. Location, regional geology, distribution and geometry of facies and rock-fabric flow units for the L a w y e r Canyon site, N e w Mexico, U.S.A. (A) - Location and geologic map of the test site in the Guadalupe Mountains. (B) - Distribution and geometry of depositional facies mapped in the upper San Andres parasequence window. (C) - Rock-fabric flow units of the upper San Andres parasequence window. (After Senger et al., 1991, figs. 1, 2 and 9; courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy.)
4~ ---I
438 carbonate reservoir performance and reserves. The low recovery efficiency of 30% makes these reservoirs prime candidates for using improved field development strategies discussed previously in the incremental recovery section of this chapter.
Lithofacies and permeability heterogeneity. The San Andres Formation ranges in thickness from 1,100 to 1,200 ft (335 - 366 m) along the Algerita Escarpment. The geologic units are known to be continuous between the Lawyer Canyon outcrop and the Wasson Field. At both locations, the formation has similar attributes making the outcrop a good analog for the producing interval in Wasson Field (Kittridge et al., 1990, table 7). Senger et al.'s (1991) and Kittridge et al.'s (1990) field investigations were limited to study grids and a vertical transect at a specific site located on the north wall of Lawyer Canyon. Results from the study grids were integrated into Chevron's investigations by Grant et al. (1994). The largest sampling interval was 10 ft (3 m) in one grid area, whereas data were collected on 1-ft and 0.5-ft (0.3-m and 0.15-m) spacing in six smaller grids, and on a 2-in. (0.05-m) spacing for the vertical transect. Geological mapping of the San Andres dolomites and grainstones, which form a series of upward shallowing parasequences some 1 0 - 4 0 ft (3 - 12 m) thick (Fig. 5-101B), permitted depositional and diagenetic processes to be correlated with the variability in areal and vertical measured permeability values. The carbonate cycles at the Lawyer Canyon site coarsen upward. Parasequence boundaries at the site are typically denoted by low-permeability mudstone/wackestone beds displaying variable degrees of lateral continuity ranging from several hundred feet to more than 2,500 ft (762 m). The ramp-crest facies (dolograinstones) extends approximately 5 miles (8 km) in a dip direction, passing seaward into fusulinid dolopackstone-dominated outer ramp deposits and landward into algal-rich inner ramp dolomudstones and dolowackestones (Grant et al., 1994). The dolomudstone beds at Lawyer Canyon are potentially important as flow barriers (Fig. 5-101 C) (Senger et al., 1991). Three wells (Algerita Nos. 1, 2 and 3) were drilled by Chevron and cored adjacent to the outcrop. Algerita 2 and 3 were logged using gamma-ray and lithodensity tools. Grant et al. (1994) used a hand-held scintilometer to create gamma-ray log traces along four vertical transects. The logs were used for lateral correlation. A total of 1,584 permeability measurements using the field permeameter were made at the Lawyer Canyon site by the Texas Bureau of Economic Geology study groups. Grant et al. (1994) performed some 2,748 permeability measurements on the 1 Algerita core in order to evaluate sampling strategies and further investigate vertical permeability trends. Both Chevron's and BEG's investigations concentrated on cycles 7 through 9. In addition to 600 permeability measurements collected along a 288-ft (88m) horizontal transect in the bar-crest lithofacies of cycle 9, a total of 1003 permeability measurements were obtained by Grant et al. (1994) using four vertical transects across cycles 7 - 9 (Fig. 5-101C). Geostatistical analyses indicated that permeability correlation lengths decreased with decreasing sample spacing, and that different carbonate rock fabrics exhibited different mean permeabilities. Permeability variability in the outcrop was not confined to bed-to-bed changes, but there was substantial variability within individual units by as much as five orders of magnitude. Vertical transect data exhibited rapid
439 variation in permeability and porosity over a short vertical interval. Grant et al. (1994) noted an upward-increasing trend in geometric mean permeability and attributed the trend to the lithofacies arrangement within a depositional cycle (dolomudstones at the base and bar-crest dolograinstones at the top). They observed that these upwardincreasing permeability trends were consistently uniform from cycle to cycle. The cycles, however, are punctuated locally by low-permeability zones, even in the barcrest grainstone facies, and was attributed by Grant et al. (1994) to local subtle textural and diagenetic changes. The vertical correlation range as determined by Grant et al. (1994) was approximately 18 ft (5.5 m). This corresponded to the spacing between fine-grained mudstones and the grainstone lithofacies within and between cycles. The correlation range approximately equals the average cycle thickness and supports the conclusion that the depositional cycles may constitute a fundamental flow unit in analogous cyclic shelf- or ramp-carbonate reservoirs (Grant et al., 1994). At the site, Kittridge et al. (1990) observed two distinct scales of spatial correlation for San Andres permeability and porosity depending on the spacing of the data used. Predicted correlation lengths were 3 - 5 ft ( 0 . 9 - 1.5 m) for 1-ft and 0.5-ft (0.3-m to 0.15-m) data spacing and 0.25 ft (0.08 m) for the 1-in. and 0.5-in. ( 0 . 0 3 - 0.015 m) data. It is obvious from these results that, within the parasequences, there is a distinct variability of facies and petrophysical properties which are at scales well below those of interwell spacing of 6 6 0 - 1,330 ft (201 to 405 m) common in the San Andres reservoirs. Senger et al. (1991) extended Kittridge et al.'s (1990) outcrop/subsurface comparisons of heterogeneity study by: (1) characterizing the permeability of a grainstone parasequence (parasequence 1) of the Lawyer Canyon outcrop; (2) investigating the small-scale heterogeneities using waterflooding simulations of a hypothetical two-dimensional reservoir based on the grainstone facies that formed parasequence 1 at the outcrop; and (3) using the entire upper San Andres outcrop to conceptualize the reservoir-flow model. The upper portion is more typical of the large-scale complexity of subsurface reservoirs formed in a ramp-crest depositional environment than is a single parasequence, such as grainstone parasequence 1. Grant et al.'s (1994) permeability and fluid-flow modeling focused on cycles 7 - 9 by studying the effects of the heterogeneity pattern on uncontacted mobile oil (displacement efficiency) and on viscous, capillary, or gravitational crossflow (vertical sweep efficiency).
Permeability distributions. Characterization was accomplished by generating a series of"realistic" permeability distributions that accounted for the underlying permeability structure and the uncertainty of measurement data. To evaluate heterogeneity at different scales, permeability values from the different grids were analyzed using fitted spherical model variograms. The reader is referred to Hohn (1988, p. 25) for an explanation on modeling an observed semivariogram. Numerical waterflood flow simulations were performed using selected permeability realizations, which were designed to characterize interwell heterogeneity and to represent heterogeneity by appropriate average properties (Senger et al., 1991). A petrophysical/rock-fabric
440 approach was used to quantify the geologic framework of the reservoir-scale flow model. Figure 5-101C delineates the rock-fabric flow units of the upper San Andres parasequence window. These rock-fabric flow units exhibited significant differences in mean permeameter-measured permeability values, with the grainstone having the highest values and the mudstone having the lowest values. The bar-crest and baraccretion-set facies have the highest mean permeability of log k = 1.1 mD. The mapped parasequences are characterized by different fabric and facies combinations creating different hydraulic properties for each parasequence. Referring to Fig. 5-101 C, the mean permeabilities in grainstone-dominated parasequences 1, 2, 7, and 9 are greatly higher than those in the parasequences 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 that consist of packstone and wackestone. A kriged permeability map was constructed for the northern half of parasequence 1 using fitted variogram models (vertical 5-ft grid horizontal and 50-ft horizontal variograms) (Fig. 5-102). A drawback to kriging is that it tends to average permeability over larger areas, ignoring small-scale heterogeneity. Senger et al. (1991), therefore, produced some 200 stochastic permeability realizations using simulations for the grainstone facies in parasequence 1 (Fig. 5-101 C) in order to account for small-scale permeability heterogeneity. Their model extended laterally from 0 to 1,050 ft ( 0 - 320 m) and is 17 ft (5.2 m) thick, with block sizes of 5 ft by 1 ft (1.5 by 0.3 m). The simulations were conditioned to permeabilities measured along vertical transects spaced about 25 ft apart and incorporated the correlation structure from the variograms. Two of the distributions were chosen for flow simulations. These two permeability distributions represented the maximum and minimum lateral continuity of domains having permeability values greater than 50 mD (0.049 ~m2). A comparison of the two permeability realizations shown in Fig. 5-103 does not reveal noticeable differences; however, the spatial variability exhibited in the grainstone variograms (Fig. 5-102) are preserved. Senger et al. (1991) pointed out that the permeability patterns appear in the variogram spatially uncorrelated because of a relatively high nugget value representing local random variability that is of the same magnitude as the sill value given in Figs. 5-102A and B. Grant et al. (1994) stated that the small-scale textural and diagenetic variations are reflected in the high nugget values at separation distances less than 1 ft (0.3 m) in vertical correlation. Two of the writers (Drs. Chilingarian and Rieke) would like to point out a very important fact, which should be kept in mind. Dedolomitization: CaMg(CO3) 2+ Ca 2§ ~ 2CaCO 3 + Mg 2§ which could occur in outcrops, will decrease porosity.
BEG's waterflood simulations (Parasequence 1). Waterflooding of the grainstone facies in parasequence 1 at the Lawyer Canyon site was simulated by Senger et al. (1991) using the reservoir simulator ECLIPSE (ECL Petroleum Technologies). The simulator was used to evaluate reservoir two-phase flow characteristics in a hypothetical two-dimensional reservoir. Water was injected along the right boundary of the hypothetical reservoir, and fluids were produced along its left boundary. Input data into the simulator included pressure data, stochastic permeability distributions, porosities, relative-permeability curves, and capillary-pressure curves. An injection pressure of 2,450 psi (17 MPa) and production pressure of 750 psi (5.2 MPa) were prescribed to control the water injection and fluid production in the model.
441 Verticol Correlotion of k Doto 0.8
.....
0.7
E
_
"i
=,.:,~u.=~,"-vv=, -~.'~ _ [
9
0.6
oI . . ,
A
l____=
Spherical m0de~, r a n q e : S f f
o ~9 0.5
A
_
9
.I,. ,;.
0.4
~d
9
0.3
'
9
O
l)
}
:
I
;
"i
0.2 i
1
O.I 0
5
I0
1,5
20
?.5
D I S T A N C E (ft)
S H O R T R A N G E C O R R E L A T I O N OF k DATA
'
] I I
I I 0"I "
0.8-
E o L_
B
~0.6
-
. = t _
_ V
0.4-
J
A v
_,r
o I0.2
0
......
-
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
DISTANCE (ft)
LO NG-RANGE CORRELATION OF k DATA O.8
9
0.7
-
~
~
. . . .
,, ! . ~ :
~
-
----'~"Nesled s ,
:
. . . . . .
,
~
9
E 0.6 -
C
~ 9~ _ .
L_
9
-
9 0.4-
o
-r
().3
0
200
400
6L~O
800
1000
DISTANCE (fl)
Fig. 5-102. Sample variogram models for the entire permeability transects from the grainstone facies in San Andres parasequence 1. ( A ) - Vertical fitted variogram model. ( B ) - Short-range horizontal fitted variogram model based on the 5-ft (1.5-m) grid. (C) - Long-range horizontal variogram model, based on all transects spaced about 50 ft (15 m) apart. (After Senger et al., 1991, fig. 14; courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy.)
442
LOG P E R M E A B I L I T Y [ mD ] COND.SIMULATION:REAL!ZATION No.7 .
.
.
.
!6
1.:2
o
~,~
300
4~,
soo
750
900
........ ~.oso
LOG PERMEABILITY[ mD ] COND.SIMULAT!ON:REALIZAT!ON No.1 1 6. 129
0
1~ :
~
450
600
750
~
1050
B D i s t a n ~ in Feet
i-i..5 ~1.5-2
~ < 0
Fig. 5-103. Comparison of two conditional permeability distributions (see Table 5-XXII). (A)-Realization No. 7 represents the minimum lateral continuity of domains having permeability values greater than 50 mD. (B) - Realization No. 11 represents the maximum lateral continuity of domains having permeability values greater than 50 mD. (After Senger et al., 1991, fig. 17; courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy.)
443 Fluid property input data assumed in the waterflood simulations are: (1) oil viscosity = 1 cP, (2) water viscosity = 0.804 cP, (3) oil specific weight = 55 lb/ft 3, (4) water specific weight = 64 lb/ft 3, (5) residual oil saturation = 0.25, and (6) residual water saturation = 0.1. The porosity-permeability relation was based on a linear transform representing intergranular pore characteristics in a grainstone: k = (5.01 • 10m)q~8.33,
(5-133)
where k is the intrinsic permeability (mD) and ~bis the fractional intergranular porosity. Equation 5-133 was established from core-plug analyses at the site. This equation was used to calculate porosity distributions from the stochastic permeability realizations shown in Fig. 5-103. The derived porosities typically ranged between 5 - 25%. Similarly, Senger et al. (1991) developed an empirical equation (for grainstone) relating the fractional water saturation (S), to the fractional intergranular porosity (~b), and capillary pressure (as the height in feet of the reservoir above the free-water level) (h): S = 68.581 h--~
-1.745
(5-134)
9
Honarpour et al. (1986) provided two equations for determining the relative-permeability functions for oil (ko) and water ( k ) : N k
rw
-k
~
rw
I 1 --S S
--Swr or
-S
Iw
(5-135)
wr
and N =k~
~o
I
1 - S
-S
w 1 -- Sr - Swr
1' ~
(5-135)
where Sor is the residual oil saturation, S r is the residual water saturation, and N w and N o are exponents having values of approximately 3. The values were derived from fitting relative permeability data (slope of regression line from a plot of the log of relative permeability vs. log of normalized saturations) obtained from grainstones of two cores from Dune Field in west Texas, U.S.A. The relative-permeability end points k~ and k~ are 0.266 and 0.484, respectively, and were derived from the intercepts of the log-log plots of measured relative-permeability data vs. saturation (Senger et al., 1991). Senger et al. (1991) performed a series of six numerical simulations to evaluate the different effects associated with the observed heterogeneity on production characteristics in parasequence 1 at the Lawyer Canyon site. Table 5-XXII presents the statistical results of the waterflood simulations of the grainstone facies in parasequence 1. Figure 5-104 presents four relative-permeability and capillary-pressure curves used
444 TABLE 5-XXII Waterflood simulations of grainstone facies in parasequence 1, San Andres Formation outcrop on the north wall of Lawyer Canyon, Otero County, New Mexico, U.S.A. Statistics
Mean horizontal continuity (Ch) w
No.
Permeability realization
Mean log-k (mD)
Variance log-k (mD 2)
Nugget (mD 2)
Sill (m 2)
1" 2 3 4 5 6"
7 7 11 45 kriged facies-averaged
1.219 1.219 1.219 1.219 1.219 1.219
0.42 0.42 0.45 0,38 0.46 N/A
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 N/A
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 N/A
(ft) 7.53 7.53 8.82 11.95 N/A N/A
Source: After Senger et al., 1991, table 1.
* Single relative-permeability and capillary-pressure curves.
in the flow simulations. The curves represent four different porosity intervals (5 to 10 %; 10 to 15 %; 15 to 20 %; and 20 to 25 %). Residual water saturations were calculated according to Eq. 5-134 for the four intervals, and then the Sw~values were used as input to compute the relative-permeability curves using Eqs. 5-135 and 5-136. Figure 5-105 shows that the effect of small-scale heterogeneity and associated capillary-pressure phenomena on cumulative production characteristics was relatively small, and accounted for less than a 2.5 increase in sweep efficiency. The computed water saturations exhibited sharp and vertical injection fronts despite large variations in permeability, initial saturations, and capillary pressures in some of the simulations (Table 5-XXII). Senger et al. (1991) remarked that for practical purposes, the observed heterogeneity within the grainstone facies (parasequence 1) can be represented by a geometric-mean permeability distribution employing an arithmetic-mean porosity in calculating uniform initial water saturation and accompanied capillary pressure values according to Eq. 5-134. The kriged permeability distribution in Fig. 5-105 (simulation 6 in Table 5-XXII) yields a similar production-rate pattern as the conditional permeability realizations. This indicates that small-scale permeability variability has a negligible effect on the production rate and only large-scale permeability patterns need to be incorporated into the flow model for history matching (Senger et al., 1991, p.27). One should be aware that the water (driving phase) to oil (driven phase) mobility ratio M (M = kw/k x po/Pw)in the above waterflood simulations was not discussed by Senger et al. (1991). If the mobility does not change in the model, then the fluid's velocity and flow rate also would remain unchanged. As in the above waterflood simulations, where both oil and water are flowing simultaneously, it is the ratio of the mobility of the water to that of the oil which determines their individual flow rates and, therefore, the water/oil ratio. The mobility ratio is an important factor affecting the displacement efficiency of oil by water. If M = 1, then the mobilities of the displaced and displacing phases are identical. An M < 1 is favorable and the areal displacement efficiency is usually high, whereas M > 1 is unfavorable. Detailed discussion on the mobility ratio and waterflooding of carbonate reservoirs is presented Langnes et al. (1972).
445 RELATIVE-PERMEABILITY CURVES I m
A -0.1
0.1-:.
p. =
5-10 }; P O R O S I T Y 10-15% P O R O S I T Y 15-?OX POROSITY 20-25% POROSITY
L] C~ ',
FACIES AVERAGEt~ DUNE F I E L D DAT~.
9
-O.Oi
o oi-
O.Otl
'
I =
I
'
'"
I
0.2
0
'
'
|
'
0.4
I
.
_O.OOI
i
0.8
0.6 Sw
CAPILLARY-PRESSURE CURVES 250 j
,
,
I
i
=
,
i
I
_i
;
,
__
__
~
\
200~
.......
I
,
5-10% 10-15% 15-20~ 20-25Y, FACIES
,
,
I
l
i
I
I
B
POROSITY POROSITY POROSITY POROSITY AVERAGED
=
150.
t,
I00
i \\
50
, 0
w
x I
I
02
9
.
=I
-I
i
i
0.4
,
I
0.6
'
I
v
I 0.8
Sw
Fig. 5-104. Relative-permeability and capillary pressure curves used in the different flow simulations (Table 5-XXII). (A) - Relative-permeability curves used for the six waterflood simulations in SanAndres parasequence 1. (B) - Capillary-pressure curves used for the six different waterflood simulations in parasequence 1. (After Senger et al., 1991, figs. 19 and 20; courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy.)
446 Q u
a
70.0
6o.o.
..... :,ra.-~-'--~ : - 2 ~ - ' - ~ - ' -
--
0.
I
0 ,,eC
50.0
-
40.0
-
0 U
L O
veraged permeability 0
............ Conditional permeability realization 7
C
.9 .6U 0 L Q.
30.0 -
/
(single-capillary pressure curve) Conditional permeability realization 7
/ 20.0
(multiple-capillary pressure curve) Conditional permeability realization
-
0
:,T.
II
(multiple-capillary pressure curve)
Q
Unconditional permeability realization
Io.o -
0 ..,..
45
(zero nugget, multiple-capillary pressure curve) Kriged permeability (multiple-capillary pressure curve)
E 0.0
1 0.0
I
I
I 0.2
1
I
1
I 0.4
I
I
I
ir' 0.6
I
i
i
!
!
I
0.8
T'
i LO
I
!
i
I 1.2
I
i
i
i L4
i I. 5
Injected pore volume
Fig. 5 - 1 0 5 . Cumulative oil production as percentage of original oil-in-place for six waterflood simulations in San Andres parasequence 1. (After Senger et al., 1991, f i g . 2 5 " courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy.)
Outcrop reservoir-flow model (11 flow units). The approach taken by Senger et al. (1991) to model the large-scale effects was an elaboration of the waterflood simulation. Both the geologic model of the Lawyer Canyon parasequence window (Fig. 5101B) and the rock-fabric characterization of the depositional facies (Fig. 5-101C) were used to define the conceptual reservoir-flow model. The model distinguishes 11 flow units (Fig. 5-101B) having different average permeability, porosity, initial water and residual oil saturation values (Table 5-XXIII), and uses the same fluid properties used in the waterflood simulations. A total of 4089 irregularly-shaped grid blocks compose the model. The blocks represent the spatial distribution and the petrophysical properties of the different rock fabrics and depositional facies. Block size is 100 ft (30 m) in the horizontal direction with a variable thickness in the vertical direction ranging from less than 0.5 ft (0.15 m) to several feet. The injection and production rates were controlled by selected pressures of 4,350 psi (30 MPa) and 750 psi (5.2 MPa), respectively. Simulations were run for 20-, 40-, and 60-year scenarios. Senger et a1.(1991) assigned three different petrophysical/rock-fabric classes for nonvuggy carbonates to the five productive flow units in Fig. 5-101. The three classes (grainstone, grain-dominated packstone, and mud-dominated, <20 ~tm) were distinguished based on porosity, permeability, and saturation relationships. The relationships between permeability and porosity are given in Fig. 5-106. The water saturations for the grain-dominated packstone and the mudstone-wackestone rock-fabric classes were established using empirical relationships similar to those used in defining Eq. 5-134.
447 TABLE 5-XXIII Rock-fabric flow unit properties used in the Lawyer Canyon outcrop reservoir-flow model Flow units Rock fabric
Depositional facies
Porosity (arithmetic average)
Permeability (geometric average, mD)
Residual oil saturation
0.9
0.01
Flooded shelf Tidal fiat
0.04
Wackestone
Shallow shelf I
0.105
0.30
0.405
0.4
Grain-dominated packstone
Shallow shelf I
0.085
4.50
0.214
0.35
4
Grain-dominated packstone
Shallow shelf II Bar top
0.129
1.80
0.40
0.35
5
Grain-dominated packstone
Shallow shelf II
0.118
5.30
0.243
0.35
6
Grainstone (moldic)
Shallow shelf II
0.145
0.7
0.091
0.40
7
Grainstone (moldic)
Shallow shelf I Shallow shelf II Bar crest Bar top
0.159
2.2
0.077
0.40
8
Grainstone (highly moldic)
Shallow shelf II Bar crest Bar-accretion sets
0.23
2.5
0.041
0.40
1
Mudstone
2 3
0.01
Initial water saturation
9
Grainstone
Bar flank
0.095
9.5
0.189
0.35
10
Grainstone
Bar crest Bar-accretion sets
0.11
21.3
0.147
0.25
11
Grainstone
Bar crest
0.135
44.0
0.103
0.25
Source" After Senger et al., 1991, table 2.
The equation for the grain-dominated packstone is" S = 106.524 h-~176 -1"440
(5-137)
and for the mudstone-wackestone, Sw= 161.023
h--~176176
(5-138)
where h is the height of the reservoir above the flee-water level in feet and ~bis the fractional porosity. The initial saturations for the different flow units were calculated using Eqs. 5-134, 5-137, and 5-138 for the three rock-fabric classes and average porosities. Rock-fabric, porosity, and water-saturation correlations based on capillary-pressure curves are shown in Fig. 5-107. The effect of vuggy porosity in the grainstones of parasequence 7 (Fig. 5-101 C) was accounted for by assigning a higher residual oil saturation to the unit,
448
Grainstone I00.0
100.0
e; o. E
Grain-dominated ,
packstone
100-
1o.o
Mud-dominated
< 2 0 I,t m
/]
I00.0
I0.0-
(
.~"
e; 9
.
41/O
1.o
/
1.09
9
o.1
T
l
2
[
T
I
I
5
IT
0.I
T
10
Interpart~cle
20
30
r
r
r
T
2
1.0-
[
t
5
o.1
t
0
InterpartJcle
porosity
!
20
30
i
i
2
poros0ty
i
i 1 ii
10
Interparticle
20
30
porosity
(percent)
(percent)
(percent)
I
5
Fig. 5-106. Lawyer Canyon San Andres outcrop porosity--permeability relationships from core-plug measurements for the three rock-fabric classes of nonvuggy carbonates. The large data scatter shows a poor correlation in these log-log plots. (After Senger et al., 1991, fig. 7; courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy.)
.
_ ' _ . : . . ' _ , . . . . . . . . . . . ~...... . ~ . : ~ . ~ . . : ~ . . ~
...... ~................. _ ~ . ~
. . . .
.'.../_~.:'..
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::i.:. ::::::::::::::::::::::: MD LIMESTONE ===================== :::::::::::!::'::::::::: ====================== ::l F I N E XL M D D O L O M I T E
...................-f-....... ! ....... i .......i ~ N " ~
........ ' ,
-t--~
~ ~::~i
........... ~.L. .... ~~..... :-----:-:---" !' i ~: \ ~\ :~ " :" ....",,~~~"~! ..... 7" ..... i; ... ....... \ : ........... .......
o~
0.1
............. ....... ' ..... iSi
.....
....:
o
-i
0.01 0.01
..
,.-.
'
i
,..
i
~! ":~
I
......-'i..... ::.... i i:,l
- ~: :::..:.:~ :i..:.:'~-:~:! . ~ " ! ! : ! " ! : I . . . . . . . -.-;' ..... ";: .... ' . . .:. . . . . .:. . ITE .. . .. ... ... ... .. . ~ 'm. -,--.:, 9 9] I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; : - ....:,j--..j...'~:.-~- .-.i-.l i 9 , MEDIUM XL MD DOLOMITE t GD PACKSTONE
GR/~INSTONE - -. .-. .I. ~ L A R G E XL D O L O M 9 ': " ! " " " : .... i " .... ,
O: I.U I--
~
o.
~,
-=
9
9
'"
I"~ I I '1 t
0.1
..... I
I
i
~
i
!i
:i i
lj
1
I
POROSITY
Fig. 5-107. Porosity, water saturation, and rock-fabric relationships derived from capillary-pressure curves used in the reservoir-flow model (refer to Table 5-XXIII). (After Senger et al., 1991, fig. 8; courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy.)
449 and that the same porosity-saturation relationship exists as in the nonvuggy grainstones of parasequences 1, 2, 3, and 9 (Senger et al., 1991). The relative permeability values for the different flow units were obtained from the shapes of the relative-permeability curves derived from relative-permeability data from the two grainstone cores from Dune Field (west Texas, U.S.A.). These curves are similar to those shown in Fig. 5-104. Senger et al. (1991) pointed out that only the relative-permeability endpoints were adjusted according to the computed initial water saturations and assumed residual oil saturations. Table 5-XXIV summarizes the six outcrop simulation scenarios used to study the various factors affecting reservoir-flow behavior using the ECLIPSE reservoir simulator. Senger et al. (1991) used simulation EC-A to represent the base scenario in their hypothetical Lawyer Canyon outcrop carbonate reservoir model. Production characteristics of the six simulations were compared in order to evaluate: (1) capillary pressure effects (EC-B), (2) different production well locations (right, left and middle), and (3) different grid layouts (irregular and normalized). The production results of the simulations are shown for production rate (Fig. 5-108A), water cut (Fig. 5-108B), and cumulative production (Fig. 5-108C). Neglecting capillary pressure (simulation EC-B) results in a lower sweep efficiency except in the later stages of pore volume injection when it is about the same as simulation EC-A and lower than simulation EC-DP (Fig. 5-108C). Senger et al. (1991) noted that capillary pressure improves the sweep of the less permeable zones in parasequences 3 through 6 as was exhibited by EC-A data. Waterflooding in simulation EC-B was restricted to the more permeable grainstone facies in parasequences 1, 2, 7, and 9. In order to evaluate the effects of different injection schemes, the production and injection wells were varied as shown in Table 5-XXIV. The injection and production TABLE 5-XXIV Model scenarios for six waterflood simulations of the Lawyer Canyon outcrop model. Fluid properties are the same as used in the waterflood study of parasequence 1 Model scenario Sim. no.
Grid
Production well location
Capillary pressure
Permeability data
EC-A EC-B EC-N EC-DP EC-R EC-F
Irregular Irregular Normalized Normalized Irregular Irregular
Right Right Right Right Left Middle
Yes No Yes Single Yes Yes
Facies-averaged Facies-averaged Facies-averaged Linear interpolated between wells Facies-averaged Facies-averaged
Fluid properties: Oil viscosity Water viscosity Oil density Water density
1.000 cP 0.804 cP 55 lb/ft 3 64 lb/ft 3
Source: After Senger et al., 1991, table 3.
450
-\
50--
i ,,
EC-A
4 o
EC-B
EC.N .............EC.DP
A
Iu3 ~3o 9
......
EC-R
..~
EC-F
i #''x
~ &
8
.9 ~
...........
~
10
O0
O0
05
I0
15
20
25
30
T,me (d K 103)
,,,..; ..~_.:.._-.~_- =-=--. . . . .
..;~,,~..~ ,,,-,'"
,, ::4~/."
,,;I ! i
/
,,'/ !i
06-
o
~
~
...............
ii
,, ,,,"
B
,
,'I 0.4
/
,
I 9
" ..../"
,, , . " ""/ "/ /'i
l// /
EC^
-.-
EC-B
"
EC-N
......-""
./"
'.'
../'"
..........
............ 9
EC-DP
. 9. . . .
EC-R EC-F
02-
I'i1 ,,t;'/, , ,
0.0-
0.2
0.0
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
0.6
Inlected 50 0
I
0 4
I
i
I
1
08
.0
pore volume
-.../. ...... y,,,
._.~.-~
_..........
:..~ ........
C
-.-~..~--
-
../,i~./'-
20.0
-----
EC-A EC-B EC-N
............. E C - D P
10.0
......
EC-R EC.F
O0
I
O0
I
I
I O2
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
016
04
I~jected
pore volume
I
I
I
I 0 8
i'
1
1 .0 c_~r
Fig. 5-108. Reservoir performance results from six waterflood simulations using the Lawyer Canyon San Andres outcrop model. (A)-Oil-production rate vs. time; (B)-Water/oil ratio vs. injected pore volume; ( C ) - Cumulative oil production as a percentage of original oil-in-place. (After Senger et al., 1991, figs. 29, 30 and 31; courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy.)
451 wells in the model were reversed for the simulation EC-R, changing the model's production characteristics. The model and reservoir-fluid properties are the same as used in the EC-A simulation. Simulation EC-F's configuration has the production well in the center of the model with two injections wells placed at either side of the production well. The prescribed pressures were adjusted in order to create the same pressure gradient between the injection wells and the production well. Results from the EC-R simulation indicated that after 40 years of waterflooding there will be a larger area of unswept oil at the model's center than in the simulation EC-A. Initial production rates are lower for EC-R than in EC-A. According to simulation EC-R, at later times the production will have a lower WOR (Fig. 5-108B) than EC-A. Simulation EC-A indicates a higher sweep efficiency than EC-R. This shows that the spatial distribution of permeable grainstone facies relative to the direction of the waterflood (Fig. 5-101B) is important for the overall reservoir-flow behavior (Senger et al., 1991). In simulation EC-R, cross flow occurred on the left side of the model toward the production well from parasequence 1 all the way down to parasequences 1 and 2. Cross flow did not occur on the left-hand side in simulation EC-A. This result was attributed by Senger et al. (1991) to the fact that cross flow on the left hand side of the model during simulation EC-R was facilitated by the existence of discontinuous mudstone layers, whereas on the right side the layers are continuous. They noted, however, that continuous mudstone layers are not always flow barriers as evidenced by the cross flow in simulation EC-A between parasequences 9 and 7 in the upper right of the model. Results of the EC-F simulation showed that the initial production rates are much higher in simulation EC-F than the other simulations. After 16,000 days, the production rate leveled off at slightly higher rate than was shown by simulation EC-A (Fig. 5-108A). The water cut rate for EC-F breaks at a lower WOR than that in simulation EC-A (Fig. 5-108B). Figure 5-108C shows that the sweep efficiency of EC-F is lower than in simulation EC-A, but slightly higher than in simulation EC-R (Senger et al., 1991). Different grid layouts were used to study the effect of irregular formation geometry (EC-N and EC-DP) with that of normalized formation geometry. In simulation EC-N, the nine parasequences were normalized to a constant thickness. When compared with the base case EC-A shown in Fig. 5-108A, the production rate is higher for EC-N and there is an earlier drop off of the rate. Figure 5-108B shows a steeper waterbreakthrough curve in simulation EC-N than in EC-A. This means that simulation EC-N results in a lower recovery efficiency. In the case of EC-DP, the constructed carbonate reservoir model used permeabilities of the individual flow units at the injection and production wells as endpoints. Permeabilities were linearly interpolated between these two wells using the normalized grid of EC-N. Only single capillarypressure and relative-permeability curves were used in the simulation (Senger et al., 1991). Results of this BEG model study verify what one would reasonably expect, that (1) the high-permeability grainstone units in parasequences 1, 2, and 9 are preferentially flooded with respect to the other parasequences, and (2) waterflooding was controlled by the low-permeable mudstone units separating most of the parasequences. Senger et al. (1991) noted that the spatial distribution of permeable grainstone facies relative
452 to the parasequence boundaries showed variable degrees of lateral continuity, which are crucial for understanding carbonate reservoir performance. This was documented by their flow simulations. The key is to predict the most permeable zones, such as bar-crest and bar-flank grainstones and packstones~ in a ramp-crest environment. As shown by parasequence 9 in Fig. 5-101B, the lateral dimensions of grainstone facies are highly variable in that the facies exhibits thick localized pods, rapid thinning, and sustained continuity. As shown by Fig. 5-108C, the recovery ofoil in the six simulations approached 45% of the total oil-in-place, which compares with oil-recovery data of the San Andres carbonate reservoirs in the Permian Basin, U.S.A. The San Andres reservoir model can be criticized for its limited two-dimensionality that overestimates sweep efficiency and which does not portray the potential effects of three-dimensional heterogeneity on flow. Chevron's F l o w Models. Fortunately, further model comparisons with the BEG's simulations using a very large Lawyer Canyon data set were performed by Grant et al. (1994). The goal of this study was to illustrate the relationship between fluid flow, carbonate cycles, and lithofacies variation. Grant et al. (1994) applied four different permeability models to delineate how permeability heterogeneity affects viscousdominated flow behavior and recovery efficiency in analogous cyclic ramp-crest carbonate reservoirs. Reservoir and flow parameters for the simulations were derived from an evaluation of the waterflood in the McElroy Field, which is located along the eastern edge of the Central Basin Platform, near Dune Field, in Crane and Upton counties, west Texas, U.S.A. (Table 5-XXV). The flow simulations were used to determine the level of detail required to represent the "effective" heterogeneity description for cycles 7 - 9 (Grant et al., 1994). The models used in the study are: (1) facies-averaged or "layer-cake" model, which incorporated the geometric mean permeabilities for the facies identified on the outcrop; (2) detailed geostatistical model, which consisted of 21,877 cells generated by using Hewett and Behrens' (1988) conditional simulation fractal technique; (3) coarse-grid model, which contained 3,068 cells and was designed to test scaling by using the averaging effects of fractal conditional simulations in the presence of detailed data; and (4) the realistic model included anisotropic permeability by facies and cycles, which were derived from whole core permeability data from the No. 1 Algerita well core. Fractures were not modeled in these simulations. Both the facies-averaged and the coarse-grid models used isotropic permeabilities in each cell ( k / k h = 1). The results of this study are shown in Fig. 5-109 and are not as optimistic as the BEG simulation results presented in Fig. 5-108C. Grant et al.'s (1994) horizontal variogram demonstrated a short correlation range that resulted in nearly uncorrelated permeability patterns in the detailed geostatistical, coarse-grid, and realistic models. Consequently, the nearly uncorrelated permeability patterns dominated the vertical sweep efficiency in these models resulting in very little difference in the recovery curves (Fig. 5-109). It was concluded by Grant et al. (1994) that a coarser-grid, fractal representation performs equally as well as fine-grid, geologically realistic, or geometrically-averaged facies models for estimating sweep efficiencies. An extremely
453 TABLE 5-XXV Model, reservoir, and fluid parameters and values used in waterflood simulations of cycles 7 - 9, Chevron's Lawyer Canyon, New Mexico, U.S.A., San Andres outcrop model Parameter
Simulator value
Displacement parameters (dimensionless)
Endpoint mobility ratio (M~ Gravity number (N~ Capillary number (NRL) Aspect ratio (L/H)
0.59 0.007 4980 7.77
Panel and cell dimensions
Length Height Depth Total number of cells "Detailed" model "Coarse" model Average cell dimensions "Detailed" model "Coarse" model
157.5 m (516.7 ft) 20.3 m (66.5 ft) 0.3 m (1 ft) 21,877 3068 0.2• 1.2m(0.5x 1 x4ft) 0 . 3 x 0 . 3 x 3 m ( 1 • 1 x lOft)
Boundary conditions
No-flow boundaries Perforated intervals (injector/producer) Injector Producer
top and bottom of panel all wellbore cells 1 bbl/day 2000 ps (max) 1550 psi (min)
Rock and fluid properties
Average total pore volume Average permeability Average porosity Connate water saturation Residual oil saturation Injected water viscosity at reservoir conditions Produced oil viscosity at reservoir conditions
985 bbl 11.0 mD 14% 25.8% 36.5% 0.62 cP 0.97 cP
Source: After Grant et al., 1994, table 2" reprinted with the permission of American Association of
Petroleum Geologists. favorable mobility ratio was used in their simulations (endpoint mobility ratio = 0.59). This ratio favored efficient fluid displacement in heterogeneous permeability fields. They did not, however, model the carbonate outcrop panel with more reasonable (higher) mobility ratios in order to study the effects of fine-scale heterogeneity on the sweep efficiency. Fine-scale heterogeneities should have a large impact in CO 2 floods with M > 20. Grant et al. (1994) noted important differences between the four models. Figure 5110 is a crossplot illustrating water injection (processing) rates for the models. The injection rates resulted in different oil recovery responses with respect to the water break-through times and oil production rate schedules. Differences observed in the injection rates reflect the variations of heterogeneity in each of the models. The detailed model has an overall effective permeability that is 1.2 times that of the coarse
454
0.30
v
13
9
o
9
'10 0 t._
n n
0.20
era=
O O
"Layer Cake" Model
O cO
--
0.10
P V I = 0.21
--
Detailed Model
--=----
(J
C o a r s e Model
......
L--
il
.
.
"Realistic" M o d e l .
.
.
.
.
.
0.00 0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Total Pore Volumes
0.5
0.6
0.7
Injected
Fig. 5-109. Hypothetical San Andres cumulative oil production as a percentage of original oil-in-place for the four models used by Chevron. (After Grant et al., 1994, fig. 15" courtesy of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
model, 1.4 times that of the realistic model, and 3.2 times that of the layer cake model (Grant et al., 1994). The team believed that refining the grid to smaller cell sizes improved the probability of connecting fine-scale permeability streaks.
Significance of the Lawyer Canyon outcrop studies. It was demonstrated in Senger et al.'s (1991) and Grant et al.'s (1994) case examples that acquired in-field permeability data can be applied to statistical flow models in characterizing heterogeneity in ramp-crest carbonate reservoirs. The field permeameter was shown to be a potent tool for capturing fine-scale heterogeneity patterns in carbonate rocks lacking fractures and vuggy porosity. Although permeability data were very heterogeneous at all scales of observation, permeability increased upward within the individual cycles (parasequences). The flow units, interpreted as mappable intervals with similar petrophysical properties, can be best defined in terms of rock-fabric facies. Grant et al. (1994) suggested that, in general, the individual depositional cycles at the Lawyer Canyon outcrop are probably equivalent to a flow unit. Each flow unit has distinct vertical permeability patterns, spatial statistics, and flow boundaries. Variations of cycle thickness and of the lithofacies within a cycle have a strong effect on permeability distribution and fluid flow. At another site, under different geologic depositional conditions, the flow unit could be composed of a series of thick or thin cycles, or a combination of both. As noted previously in this chapter, permeability in carbonate rocks can be highly uncorrelated laterally and vertically. One way of accommodating permeability under
455 0.7
/ / / /
0.6
/ /
0.32 P V l / y e a r - ~ 1 . ~
/
/
0.5 @
0.27 PVl/year ~
C
m
/
,,
0
S
0.4 /
/
9
m
0
>
0 0
L_
0.23 P V I / y e a r . , , , , ~ , , , ~/
Id
,.,
*
*
0.3
I1.
/
u
/
J,
0.2
.
9
0
I-
.~
0.10
/
0.1
----. -
#. 0.0
0
100
200
300
400
, ----
"Layer Cake" Model Detailed Model Coarse Model "Realistic" Model
500
6(X)
700
800
Days Injected Fig. 5-110. Water processing rates for the four models used by Chevron. Differences in the water processing rates for the San Andres reflect the variations of heterogeneity in each model. (After Grant et al., 1994, fig. 16; courtesy of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
this condition is to use short ranges of correlation and high variances. Grant et al. (1994) recommended a sampling density of 1 - 2 in-field permeability measurements per foot (30 cm) in order to capture permeability trends. An inference that can be deduced from these field studies is that the short correlation lengths are probably what generally distinguish carbonate reservoir production behavior from that of sandstone reservoirs. With some exceptions, sandstone reservoirs tend to exhibit petrophysical properties with longer correlations. Further investigations are needed to clarify this point. As a word of caution, these two case studies provided only hypothetical results that showed similar results derived from active San Andres reservoir waterfloods in west Texas, U.S.A. Grant et al. (1994) noted that the uniform saturation profile, coupled
456 with the very low water processing rate exhibited by the layer cake model, had a water breakthrough that lagged 260 days behind the geostatistically generated models. This condition demonstrated that such a simplistic geologic model misrepresents the geological and petrophysical complexities needed to simulate accurately the effects of carbonate reservoir heterogeneity on fluid displacement and production. A visual examination of computer-generated water saturation profiles helps to clarify the impact of different lithofacies on fluid flow. Examples were provided by Grant et al. (1994, fig. 15, p. 43) which showed upward-increasing permeability trends as evidenced by high water saturations present in the bar-crest dolograinstone facies of the Lawyer Canyon depositional cycles 7 and 9 (Fig. 5-101C). Water saturations in cycle 8 lags behind the waterflood fronts in cycles 7 and 9 owing to a lack of grain-rich barcrest and bar-flank facies. Senger et al.'s (1991) and Grant et al.'s (1994) simulations showed that the basal dolomudstones act as baffles to vertical cross-flow. In Grant et al.'s (1994) realistic model, the dolomudstones were modeled as nearly continuous across the outcrop panel and with kv/kh> 1, little crossflow occurred across the dolomudstone boundaries. There was considerable permeability streaking in the bar-crest and bar-flank dolograinstone lithofacies. Grant et al.'s (1994) simulations demonstrated that it is the thin, poorlydeveloped cycles lacking good dolograinstone layers, such as cycle 8, which resulted in the greatest compartmentalization of viscous-dominated fluid flow within a given succession of cycles. Most of the bypassed oil remained in these poorly-developed cycles. This was supported by Senger et al.'s (1991) facies-averaged waterflood simulations. Their model results showed a systematic stacking of poorly developed parasequences (cycles) that compartmentalized fluid flow into two distinct "flow horizons".
Radiological imaging applications New, cutting-edge, nondestructive imaging techniques such as computerized Xray tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) microscopy are used in the laboratory to obtain three-dimensional visual information of the distribution of fluids in porous media. This visualization capability is of direct help in determining the oil displacement processes taking place at the micro- and mesoscopic scales (Fig. 5-37), aiding in the design of recovery processes, and assessment of sample heterogeneity. Saraf (1981) questioned the accuracy of other in-situ methods that were used previously to determine fluid saturations during coreflood experiments, such as (1) transparent models, (2) microwave absorption, (3) radioisotope injection, (4) neutron radiography, (5) resistivity, and (6) magnetic susceptibility. All the above methods imposed restrictions on the experimental technique and provided only areal average values for fluid saturations (Wellington and Vinegar, 1987).
X-ray computerized tomography (CT). Slobod and Caudle (1952) introduced the X-ray shadowgraph (radiograph) method for studying sweep-efficiency in five-spot and line-drive well patterns. The shadowgraph is restricted to two-dimensional investigations owing to the fact that an X-ray shadow projection onto a single plane obscures three-dimensional information. Recently, high-resolution X-radiography was used to decipher the depositional history of sedimentary rocks at the microscale (Algeo et al., 1994).
457 Although this technique might reveal millimeter-scale heterogeneities, it is the images of fluid-flow patterns obtained during corefloods that are deemed important in testing the overall effect of heterogeneity on flow in carbonate rocks. Carbonate reservoir engineering applications of computerized tomography include the investigation of CO 2 displacement in laboratory cores, studying viscous fingering, gravity segregation, miscibility, and mobility control. Computerized tomography differs from X-ray radiography in that image construction and its display are generated using a computer and proprietary software packages (Macovski, 1983; Orsi et al., 1994). This technique measures density and atomic composition inside opaque objects. Second- and later-generation medical CT scanners have the appropriate X-ray energy and dose for scanning cores and slab models. CT scanners produce two-dimensional cross-sectional image slices through an object by revolving an X-ray tube around the object and obtaining projections at various different angles (Wellington and Vinegar, 1987). A three-dimensional array is created from the two-dimensional transmission images. Recently, Jasti et al. (1993) described new CT technology that directly measures three-dimensional geometric and topological properties of porous rocks on a microscale using a microfocal X-ray imaging system. Petrophysical applications of CT scanning have aided in the three-dimensional determination along a core's length of: (1) bulk density and porosity patterns, (2) core-well log correlation by direct comparison of the density log's bulk density signature and one generated from the core, (3) drilling fluid invasion, (4) fractures (natural and induced), (5) complex mineralogies, (6) sand(carbonate)/shale ratios, (7) hydrocarbon/water/gas distributions, (8) sedimentological features such as thin flow-barriers, and (9) uniaxial compressibility of the rock under compression. It is important to remember that semivariograms of various rock and fluid properties, such as porosity, permeability and residual fluid saturations, can be calculated from CT data and are used to determine correlation lengths on the laboratory (micro- to meso-scopic) scales. Pathak et al. (1982) demonstrated that the topology of the matrix's pore system was critical for residual oil saturations. They measured connectivity between pores. Their study showed that when a matrix contains a larger number of pore interconnections, there is a greater number of alternative routes available for oil drainage resulting in a lower percolation threshold and a lower residual oil saturation. Pathak et al. (1982) concluded that flow properties in porous media not only depend on pore size and shape, but also on local connectivity. Porosity distributions can be measured with any two fluids as long as the fluids attenuate the CT X-rays differently. Dopants are sometimes added to the injection brines and oils in order to increase the difference between the X-ray attenuation of water and oil. Iodated oils, such as 1-iododecane, can be added to the oleic phase, and high-atomic number salts such as sodium iodide or tungstate to the brine. Sodium iodide was preferred by Withjack (1988) for the aqueous phase owing to its interaction with clay minerals, which is similar to the sodium chloride interactions with clays. Figure 5-111 illustrates CT-determined average porosity values of a porous, permeable, fine-grained dolomite sample (Silurian Guelph Formation from the J.E. Baker Co. quarry in Millersville, Ohio, U.S.A.). In making the porosity measurements, Withjack (1988) used a range of sodium iodide molar solutions of 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 and X-ray tube voltages of 80 and 120 kV. The 0.75 molar concentration
458 ........... :...........
:~.:~
--
_. ~
Q 80kV .... 9
'
~
....
__ ...........................................
: : B
:,,,:
'
....................
,.~ ......-..;
"
120kV ............................... ]:
0.30
0,25 0,2C ~ROStTY,
FRACTION 0.ifi 0,IC
0.05 O.OC 0.25
0.50 0.75 1.00 CONCENTRATION. MOLARITY "peak
Fig. 5-111. Computerized tomography measured fractional average porosity values for a Silurian dolomite from the Guelph Formation of Ohio, U.S.A. Testing was done at 80 and 120 kV with four sodium iodide concentrations of 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 molar. (After Withjack, 1988, fig. 9; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
provided a close agreement (within about + 1%) between CT and conventionally measured porosities (Withjack, 1988). MacAllister et al. (1993), Wellington and Vinegar (1987), and Withjack (1988) described the use of a CT scanner to measure in-situ gas-water and oil-water saturations (apparent relative permeabilities) during displacement studies in laboratory cores. Apparent oil-water relative permeability relations are presented in Fig. 5-112 for a fine-grained "Baker" dolomite core (~b = 0.226; kai r = 110 roD) under a wettability state altered to a mixed-wettabili~, condition (MacAllister et al., 1993). Most field mixed-wettability cores are also weakly wet (Mohanty and Miller, 1991). All relative permeability values were normalized relative to ko at initial water saturation. These test results show that the relative permeabilities for the oil and water phases were higher at 4-psi (0.03-MPa) Ap than at 100-psi (0.69-MPa) Ap. MacAllister et al. (1993) considered several possible causes for the sensitivity to pressure drop, such as capillary number, capillary end effect and non-Darcy flow. Mohanty and Miller (1991) discussed potential factors and how they could influence the flow in a mixed-wettability laboratory core and, hence, the relative permeability during an unsteady test. From Mohanty and Miller's (1991) CT scan results, it was concluded that the early part (
459
:.',
i
i', o.,
llz
i
i
z
!
i
0.01
0.001
---4P--Kro
! [
~ K r w
I
-
4 psi ~p
0 -Kro 1 0 0 psi ,~p
- r'l - K r w
o.oo
..! o.a
9 ; 0.6
0.4
.b.. o.s
8w
Fig. 5-112. Computerized tomography measured relative oil and water permeabilities at 4- and 100-psi (0.03- and 0.69-MPa) differential pressures across a dolomite core (Silurian Guelph Formation, Ohio, U.S.A.) having a mixed wettability. (After MacAllister et al., 1993, fig. 5; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
Fingering becomes less severe as the flow rate decreased: apparently, krw decreased and k~o increased. The capillary end effect was small in Mohanty and Miller's (1991) test cores and would be significant only at very low flow rates. Flow parameters, capillary end-effect number, macroscopic capillary number, heterogeneity number, and instability number affect unsteady relative permeability in weakly mixedwettability rocks having viscous oil. Figure 5-112 shows that at a given fractional flow in the dolomite core, the difference between the average phase saturation at 4 psi (0.03 MPa) and 100 psi (0.69 MPa) is small, whereas the difference in apparent relative permeability is large. MacAllister et a1.(1993) concluded, after examining CT scan slices along the core, that at 4 psi (0.03 MPa), high oil saturations appear at the top and right of each cross-section and very low oil saturations appear at the bottom and left in the dolomite core (Fig. 5113A). This condition leaves large connected flow paths for both oil and water with high relative permeability (MacAllister et al., 1993). At 100 psi (0.69 MPa), the high oil saturations at the top and right of each cross-section were reduced and the very low oil saturations at the core's bottom and left increased (Fig. 5-113B). Such a condition results in a reduction of fluid flow paths and, therefore, significantly lowers relative permeability. MacAllister et al. (1993) stated that the overall average oil saturation changed very little; however, the distribution of the oil was greatly changed. The assumption of a uniform saturation distribution in the dolomite core is shown not
460
,A .,.~,~ ...
~'%,
~!i!ii:i:...
B Fig. 5-113. Computerized tomography scans showing the oil saturation distribution along a dolomite core having mixed-wettability (Silurian Guelph Formation, Ohio, U.S.A.) with a WOR of 0.5. ( A ) Differential pressure of 4 psi (0.03 MPa); (B) - Differential pressure of 100 psi (0.69 MPa). (After MacAllister et al., 1993, figs. 7 and 8; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
to be the case. The point of these visual results presented in Fig. 5-113 is that substantial saturation redistributions would not be detected, and the cause of the large changes in the relative permeability would be difficult to infer owing to the fact that the average saturations change little. The oil-water relative permeability curves generated in
461 MacAllister et al.'s (1993) experiments were sensitive to pressure drop and fluid saturation, creating localized fluid heterogeneity patterns within the dolomite core. Laboratory results must be scaled to the field values of the flow parameters described above by Mohanty and Miller (1991). Unsteady-waterflood displacement tests in the laboratory should be conducted at or extrapolated to the field rate. Failure to use the appropriate relative permeability values derived using these guidelines would impact negatively the results from any simulated waterflood. MacAllister et al. (1993) obtained gas-water apparent relative permeabilities in four steady-state gas-water cycles using a "Baker" dolomite core at the end of an oilwater relative permeability test. The core was in its native water-wet state. No attempt was made by them to keep both Ap and injection rate constant. Test results showed significant gas trapping. Gas saturation decreased from residual gas at water floodout (4 psi [0.03 MPa] Ap) to a gas/water ratio of 3 (5 psi [0.035 MPa] Ap). The variation in their data was greater than the uncertainty in the laboratory measurements. CT scan comparisons of the gas distributions between the water flood-out and a GWR of 3 at 5 psi (0.035 MPa) indicated that the gas saturation in the core was affected by the heterogeneous nature of the core's front, which controlled fluid distribution. Greater fluid segregation occurred toward the core's front, which is the more heterogeneous portion of the core, than at the rear (MacAllister et al., 1993). Hicks et al. (1992) measured porosity and residual oil saturations using CT scans in three heterogeneous vugular carbonate cores having 4-in. (10-cm) diameters. The well cores were from the Fenn-Big Valley Field in Alberta, Canada, and the TaylorLink Field in Pecos County, west Texas, U.S.A., whereas an outcrop core was obtained from San Andres Formation near Carlsbad, New Mexico, U.S.A. All cores were taken perpendicular to the bedding planes. Average porosities of these cores are 6.7% (Fenn-Big Valley carbonate), 11.4% (San Andres Formation core), and 12.2% (San Andres Formation New Mexico core). The two San Andres cores have significantly different porosity distributions which resemble those from tested Berea and Boise sandstone cores, which were tested by Hicks et al. (1992). The reason why they resemble the sandstone distributions is because each core's average porosity happens to be the most common porosity present on the voxel size level (resolution of objects). Most of the porosity values in the Fenn-Big Valley core are quite low. Figure 5-114 illustrates the variations in fractional porosity along each core length. Hicks et al. (1992) calculated the residual saturations for each voxel, which were averaged over the entire core. The average residual oil saturations for the FennBig Valley and the west Texas San Andres Formation cores were 42.6 and 24.9%, respectively. They correlated porosity and residual fluid saturations as a function of position for both the Fenn-Big Valley and the Taylor-Link cores. Figure 5-115 compares the relation between the mean S in the Fenn-Big Valley carbonate core and Sor and Swr for the Taylor-Link San Andres core and porosity distributions. The Fenn-Big Valley carbonate shows less absolute variation, but much S scatter (dampened by using the mean values" Fig. 5-115A" Hicks et al., 1992). Similar scatter is shown by the west Texas, San Andres core (Fig. 5-115B). Semivariograms were calculated, and illustrate the variation of voxel size for a selected CT scan slice from the Fenn-Big Valley and the west Texas Sand Andres cores (Fig. 5-116). The Fenn-Big Valley core shows that the decreasing variances with increased voxel sizes are more pronounced than the variances in the
462
0.3
,,
-
L _
ra A n 9 9
v--v%._v__ ~v-~--
0.2
>.-
,,
San Andres (TX) Canadian San Andres (NM) Boise Berea
I--
(~ 13.
0.1
I0.0 ~
0
~
[
30
,
t
,
60
t
90
,
1 20
LENGTH, mm
Fig. 5-114. Relationship between fractional porosity and core length for three carbonate rocks (Fenn-Big Valley carbonate, Alberta, Canada; San Andres Formation, west Texas, U.S.A.; and San Andres Formation, New Mexico, U.S.A.) and two sandstones (Berea and Boise). Each longitudinal point is calculated by averaging all the pixels from a given computerized tomography scan slice. (After Hicks et al., 1992, fig. 6; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.) west Texas core. The Fenn-Big Valley core porosity indicates a definite correlation with length. Both cores show that the variance is still increasing, which Hicks et al. (1992) attributed to the wider variation in matrix porosity in the San Andres samples. Hicks et al. (1992) also studied the effect of direction on the porosity semivariograms generated for the three carbonate cores (Fig. 5-117). The results demonstrated that a difference exists in the semivariograms across the bedding planes in the two San Andres cores (Fig. 5-117B, C). The laboratory scale of heterogeneity is on the order of 0.4 in. (1 cm). Hicks et al. (1992) pointed out that the optimal grid block sizes for laboratory-scale simulations were expected to be of this size. Three-phase flow experiments using a CT scanner to measure fluid saturations were carried out by Vinegar and Wellington (1987). Tomutsa et al. (1992) pointed out that for porosity and two-phase saturation measurements, CT scanning at one X-ray energy level is sufficient. For three-phases, however, fluid differentiation requires that scanning takes place at two different X-ray energy levels. Computerized tomography scanning can provide valuable information during laboratory testing on whether or not carbonate cores have been fully saturated before, during, or after displacement studies. Data from CT scans can be used to model petrophysical properties on the laboratory scale by using semivariograms.
Magnetic resonance imaging microscopy (NMR). Porosities in carbonate rock reservoirs have been shown to be difficult to determine in situ using conventional
463
0.8
0.6 Z
<
0.4 o o9
[]
Q
0.2
I
0.0
~
I
10
0
~
I
20
9
I
30
,
1
40
,
60
50
POROSITY, %
A 0.8
~9e
a Sor
9 . ..,,,
coo
9 Swr
0.6
9
9. ~, .O3 e3 c3 "o
~
IL. -- OQ
9
-.,,.:,
---v,~, ,.~OOO
0.4
9
9
00 9
...., O3
9
0.2
9 0 . 0
1
,
I
9
I
9
D I
1~ I ~ 1 I
ca
A
L
0
10
2O
30
40
50
60
POROSITY, %
B Fig. 5-115. Residual saturations vs. porosity distribution. (A) - Mean residual oil saturation values associated with the Fenn-Big Valley, Alberta, Canada, carbonate core; (B) - Residual oil and water saturations associated with the San Andres core from west Texas, U.S.A. (After Hicks et al., 1992, figs. 11 and 12; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
464
0.012 (FENN-BIG
VALLEY
CORE
SAMPLE
1
1613.12m)
0.010
<~
0.008
:E
0.006 -~-
0.004
O.SxO.Sx2
-o-o-
0.002
9
i
- '
1 .o
0.0
!
9.
~,"
2.0
.
mm
1.0xl.0x2
men
4.0x4.0x2
mm
8.0x8.0x2
mm
.
.
3.0
! .
4.0
DISTANCE, h (cm)
A 0.006
0.005
J::
0.004
v
0.003
(.9
a 0.002
0.25xO.25x2 mm
9 0.5xO.5x2 mm = 1 x 1 x2mm
0.001
9 2x2x2mm
0.000 0
10
20
30
40
50
D I S T A N C E , h (ram)
B Fig. 5-116. Porosity semivariograms at the laboratory scale showing the variations in voxel size for two selected CT scans. (A) - Fenn-Big Valley carbonate core, Alberta, Canada; (B) - San Andres carbonate core, west Texas, U.S.A. (After Hicks et al., 1992, figs. 17 and 18; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
465 :).015
2.
1 (3
O.OLO
=I
m 9
l i 9
0.000
N-S
E-W 9 NW.SE 9 NE-SW 9 Axial
O.005 m i
l
0
9
10
I
,
i
20
9
i
4O
30
50
DISTANCE, h (ram)
A 0.0050 i gD 41 U
n
)1,-.;,,,~ 0.0025
i m a m
laJa~nunnU
u
N-S E-W 9 NW-SE 9 NE-SW 9 Axial
9
t: .m 9
~176176
n u n
nn
9 9
0.0000
~11o
i
n
s
10
,
i
9
20 30 DISTANCE. h (ram)
9
I
:
40
50
B 0.0006
9 0.0004
9
..
, . a9 ,,
;
;
9 ~ aa
a
,
*
"
n ( rii~ ====-=''''= 0.0002
Ii e
13 N-S 9 E-W 9 NW-SE 9 NE-SW 9 Axial
a 9
0.0000
'
'
'
10
J
20
'
'
"
30
D I S T A N C E , h (ram)
C Fig. 5-117. Effect of direction on porosity semivariograms. (A) - Fenn--Big Valley carbonate core, Alberta, Canada; ( B ) - San Andres carbonate core, west Texas, U.S.A.; ( C ) - San Andres dolomite core, New Mexico, U.S.A. (After Hicks et al., 1992, figs. 19, 20 and 21; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
466 porosity logs (see Chapter 4). The nuclear magnetism well logging tool (NML) was developed initially to provide a prediction of in-situ, free-fluid porosity measurements in carbonate rocks (Brown and Gamson, 1960). The free fluid index (FFI) measured by NML is equivalent to the total porosity in a carbonate rock. Timur (1972) studied the use of NMR under laboratory conditions making measurements on some 100 carbonate rock samples from four oil fields in the U.S.A. Robinson et al. (1984) expanded NML's field applications to determine residual-oil saturation and permeability. The success of these investigations and developments in medical imaging techniques led to the application of NMR in the petrophysical laboratory. In NMR imaging, a rock sample is placed inside an intensely homogeneous magnetic field generated by a superconducting magnet (Vinegar, 1986). The direct proportionality of the NMR signal frequency to the magnetic field strength is the basis of NMR imaging (Gleeson et al., 1993). Radio frequency (RF) magnetic fields at the precise Larmor frequency are generated by RF coils, which causes a particular nuclear species to precess, and the RF coils then detect signals emanating from the precessing nuclei. Three-dimensional localization within the laboratory core is obtained by x, y, and z magnetic-field gradient coils. These coils cause nuclei in different parts of the sample to precess at slightly different frequencies (Vinegar, 1986). The spatial distribution of the nuclear-spin density is obtained from a Fourier transformation of the resulting frequency-modulated signal. Vinegar (1986) stated that unlike computerized tomography, an image is obtained of the entire core volume within the RF coil. NMR imaging can provide information on the same various rock and fluid properties as were described above in the CT discussion. In addition, NMR is a useful method used in determining grain density, oil viscosity, interstitial water salinity, wettability, diffusion coefficients, and carbonate pore types. 1H NMR spectroscopy has a particular advantage in measuring petrophysical properties of low-permeable, gypsum-bearing carbonates. Vinegar et al. (1991) reported that NMR eliminates laboratory problems of extremely slow and incomplete lowtemperature oil extraction in low-permeability carbonates, and the high-temperature dehydration of gypsum in core analysis. This creates large errors in water-saturation values, which can exceed the total pore volume of the rock. The weight loss of the core owing to gypsum dehydration is reported as oil (Vinegar et al., 1991). The phase change conversion of gypsum to anhydrite results in the increase of core's air permeability. The conversion reaction is similar to the dehydration of smectite, inasmuch as the latter process produces fluids at a constant rate under the proper dehydration conditions. There is no water signal detected from waters-of-hydration of gypsum. Anhydrite and gypsum are common minerals in the Permian carbonate and evaporite sections of west Texas and New Mexico, U.S.A. Gypsum is the hydrated form of anhydrite. These minerals may occur as nodules, pore-filling material, fracture-filling material, and as massive beds. The pressure-temperature relationship between gypsum and anhydrite in the subsurface is discussed by Rieke and Chilingarian (1974, p. 323). Vinegar et al. ( 1991 ) investigated the gypsum problem occurring in an oil-bearing dolomitic zone in the San Andres Formation from west Texas, U.S.A. They used 300 vile-sealed core plugs and 166 ft (51 m) of whole sponge core (3.25-in. [8.13-cm] diameter) from this zone. Figure 5-118A compares the plug and whole core NMR fluid-filled porosity vs. depth. Porosity appears to be less variable in the whole core
467 A
~10
-
>.. I--
B-
CO
C) n-
6
O
1
n
i
4
a UJ ._1 ..J u
2
ta. I 0 a 3700 ::::) _J I.t.
.
l
,
..1
3800
l
3900
I
4000
4100
,I
4200
100
DEPTH (FEET) --
PLUGS
-0-
WHOLE
CORE
A 60
~
-J O
50 -
0
3820
"r'----'Z2"'2~ : :--::1:
.
1
3860
1
3900
3940
3980
DEPTH (FEET) --
PLUGS
-L~- WHOLE
CORE
B Fig. 5-118. Comparisons between dolomitic whole core and core plug NMR data. The cores are from the San Andres Formation, west Texas, U.S.A. ( A ) - Plot of NMR fluid-filled porosity; ( B ) - Plot of NMR oil saturation. (After Vinegar et al., 1991, figs. 7 and 8; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts.)
468 than in the plug core samples, which Vinegar et al. (1991) attributed to a larger core sample size. A larger core sample results in better statistical smoothing of porosity. No gas was present in the whole core, which could result in the fluid-filled porosity to be less than the total porosity. Figure 5-118B compares the whole core and plug core NMR-determined oil saturation. The average oil saturation in the oil-bearing zone from 3,820 to 4,000 ft ( 1 1 6 4 - 1219 m) depth interval is 20%. Vinegar et al. (1991) attributed the highly variable oil saturation on a plug-by-plug basis to more numerous local saturation variations due to heterogeneity. The comparisons in Fig. 5-118 provide strong evidence that whole-core NMR spectroscopy gives more representative results than small core plugs having only a 1-in. (2.5-cm) diameter and a length of 1.5 in. (3.75 cm). NMR-determined oil viscosity in the core plugs was about 2 - 3 cP at room temperature. The assessment of this investigation indicates that the NMR measurements were accurate, rapid, and non-invasive, resulting in NMR whole-core analysis costs substantially lower than those of standard extraction (Vinegar et al., 1991). Mazzullo and Chilingarian (1992a) discussed the various classifications of pores in carbonate rocks based on their size, shape, and mode of formation. NMR imaging has been used to determine pore structures in rocks (Mahmood, 1990). Gleeson et al. (1993) demonstrated that NMR images of water-filled and drained pores in coarsegrained limestone samples from the U.S.A. and Middle East could be used to recognize various pore types such as: (1) growth-intraframework porosity in a Holocene coral boundstone from Florida, U.S.A., (2) intergranular porosity in a peloid grainstone from the Middle East and in an ooid grainstone from the Pleistocene Miami Formation, Florida, U.S.A., (3) moldic porosity in the Miami Formation and in a molluscan grainstone from the Cretaceous Whitestone Member of the Edwards Group in central Texas, U.S.A., (4) intraparticle porosity in an Eocene foraminiferal packstone from Egypt, and (5) vuggy porosity in an Eocene foraminiferal packstone from the Middle East. Three-dimensional NMR images have shown that in certain vuggy limestones the vugs can be so elongated that the porosity can be classified as channel porosity. Gleeson et al. (1993) stated that channel porosity is difficult, if not impossible, to identify in two-dimensional NMR images. Their NMR investigation was extended to examine carbonate pore connectivity. Pore casts are commonly used to characterize a carbonate rock's pore system. Plastic resin is injected into the pore system of a sample and allowed to harden, and then the carbonate is dissolved slowly in acid leaving a three-dimensional replica of the pore system. This technique does not always capture the small-pore-sized connectivity and is difficult to manipulate and interpret quantitatively. Another technique in establishing connectivity is to use two-dimensional petrographic image analysis, which was discussed previously in this chapter. The visual advantage to three-dimensional pore images is evident in Fig. 5-119. The incremental 30 ~ rotated views of the water-saturated limestone core plug show the vuggy opaque pore structure, which exhibits channeling, in a volume of transparent solid rock. These vuggy channels represent the dominant fluid-flow paths in the plug. Light gray shading denotes the optional (other pores than channel pores) part of the pore structure. These optional pores contribute very little to the fluid flow in the core (Gleeson et al., 1993). Tomutsa et al. (1992) proposed that real-time records of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging microscopy and computerized tomography analyses of fluid displacement tests in cores and thin-slab rock models can be created using video technology.
30"
~,o
................................
i
i
~o
120"
Fig. 5-119. Three-dimensional NMR images of a water-saturated vuggy Eocene foraminiferal packstone (Middle East) core plug. Views are shown for 30 ~ increments of rotation of the limestone core. The vuggy path that extends vertically across the core is shown in black and shades of dark gray; all other pore space appears in shades of light gray. (After Gleeson et al., 1993, fig. 5; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
470 High-quality, commercial-grade video equipment can not only capture high-velocity fluid behavior events in the pores during displacement tests, but also can be used to tape sequential events in lapsed time. Video technology as a teaching aid and technology transfer device eliminates the excessive costs associated with the mass reproduction of numerous high-quality photographs required to depict complex, dynamic fluid behavior in laboratory tests. Microscopic flow heterogeneity is related to pore size, shape, and location. The application of CT and NMR technologies to define pore structure overcomes uncertainty in estimating inherently three-dimensional properties from two-dimensional images. It is obvious that the adaptation of three-dimensional image rock- and fluidproperty data in two- and three-dimensional multifractal analysis of carbonate reservoirs will improve the ability to predict more accurately the production potential of a reservoir.
Determination of heterogeneity in carbonate pore systems from laboratory gasdrive tests Another means of defining heterogeneity in carbonate rocks is the application of laboratory tests, which measure deviations in dynamic fluid behavior in cores. Characterization of core-scale heterogeneities has been accomplished by using various gas flow tests, pressure transient analysis, and standard miscible displacement experiments.
Nitrogen/helium miscible displacement test Rosman and Simon (1976) used nitrogen to displace helium from limestone and sandstone cores and sand packs to determine the microscopic flow heterogeneity. This very rapid and nondestructive method was used in the laboratory to determine the extent of core damage. The nitrogen breakthrough and effluent composition was measured by the frontal chromatography methods. Nitrogen and helium were chosen by Rosman and Simon (1976) because their viscosity ratio (nitrogen/helium) approaches unity at room temperature, and both gases have sufficiently different thermal conductivities for chromatographic detection. Microscopic flow heterogeneity was expressed by breakthrough recovery during the displacement of helium by nitrogen. Nitrogen breakthrough ranged from 0.13 to 0.78 PV injected. An early nitrogen breakthrough indicates a higher degree of heterogeneity. The results were compared with measurements from liquid, equal-viscosity miscible displacements in the same cores, and agreed well. Cores were mounted vertically to avoid gravity segregation effects caused by density difference between the two gases. Nitrogen was injected into the bottom of the vertical core and the emerging gas flowed through the chromatograph so that the nitrogen breakthrough could be timed (Rosman and Simon, 1976). Reproducibility of vertical flow was within 1% of the recovery at breakthrough. It was not affected by flow direction, although horizontally tested cores had poor reproducibility. There was deviation in the heterogeneity values on the order of 1 - 5% when the core was inverted. A core damaged by NaC1 brine (which caused clay-particle movement) showed a difference in helium recovery of more than 25% by inverting the core. Flow rate
471 affected the displacement owing to diffusion. Figure 5-120 illustrates the flow rate effect on helium recovery, at nitrogen breakthrough for two limestone cores and five sandstone cores. Rosman and Simon (1976) pointed out that as the recovery levels off, the results are similar to those from the liquid miscible-displacement tests. Microscopic flow heterogeneity in cores decreased as the length of the cores increased, that is as the length/diameter EL~D)ratio of the cores increased. Rosman and Simon (1976) explained that the reason for the heterogeneity decrease is a result of the configuration of the three-dimensional, interconnected pore network of many flow paths having conductivities that tend to even out as the flow paths become longer. This was evident in the data for the Berea and Colorado sandstone cores presented in Fig. 5-
z" ::) O n.. -r ~..
70
60 . ,
50 LIMFSTON[ CORe TYPe rE XAS CANAOA
w ~
30
~ 2o o u~ n~ o u~
r
10o
Pe_._R_M[Aplt '.?.~v
2 ,~a ] md
-
80 - 70
--
60
--
50 40
--
30
--
20
--
10
--
0
SANDSTONE CORE TYPE w B[RFA OOtSl COLORADO TEXAS
!
I
I
1
1
20
40
60
80
100
l 120
!.1 140
160
!
!
1RO
200
N 2 FLOW RATE. cc/m,n i~ 70~
Porous Medium Sandstone
Origin Boise Bart lesville Berea Berea
Colorado Colorado Texas California Limestone
Canada Texas
PERM|ABItlT~r 41; ?f~ '~d 158~ ,,~d 15~ "d 116 ,~,I
I
!
220
t I
240 260
550
1 600
I
I
1550
1OO
AND 1 ATM
Diameter (cm)
Length (cm)
Porosity (percent)
Air Permeability (md)
4.30 4.71 4.43 4. I 4.46 2.54 4.46 4.45
12.93 13.87 13.30 45.6 13.30 45.6 13.30 10.16
34.3 23.8 2 ] .0 21.7 20.0 16.9 ] 5.5 61.2
-1,8~ 46 209 711 152 156 ] 16 14,700
4.46 4.46
13.30 13.30
] 1.6 16.1
3 2
Percent Helium Recovered at Nitrogen Breakthrough
Percent Helium Recovered at 1 PV Injected
66.4" 60.6"" 63.8," 78.1 64.6 77.9 67.5 13.4
92.5" 91.6" * 91.71 95.2 92.3 94.3 92.8 7 1 .1
61.7 66.1
92.1 92.9
*C(~rrespond,nR hQutd-h(]u~drt~ults 66 7 pe~cPntat b, eakthrough (14 0 p~n'enl a: | PV ,npClpd ** C~rP~,.pnnO,n~hOu,d-hOu,dfeSull$ 58 8 perfen! at brpak|hrouRh q('1~ i:~n #f1|at I PV ,nleClnd tc~,,es~.~,.g hOu:d-I,ou,OIeSuIIs 58 6 i:)~('en! at breaklhrnulZh 91 4 perrenl al PV ,nle( t~d
Fig. 5-120. Nitrogen flow rate vs. helium recovery at nitrogen breakthrough for two limestone and five selected sandstone cores. Material properties and experimental results are listed. (Modified after Rosman and Simon, 1976, fig. 2 and table 1; courtesy o f the Society o f Petroleum Engineers.)
472 120. As the L/D ratio increased in both cases, the percent of helium recovery at breakthrough in the longer core increased. The microscopic flow heterogeneity measurements can be used to separate the effects of diffusion in core flow tests by varying injection rates. Gas turbulence in microvugular carbonates Very little information has been presented in this chapter about heterogeneity of carbonate gas reservoirs and the effect it has on gas wells. The impact of gas turbulence in low-permeability carbonate rocks was studied in the laboratory by Gewers and Nichol (1969). Turbulence of gas flowing through porous solids with relatively narrow flow passages is characterized by an excessive pressure drop associated with the inertia effects of the gas travelling through these passages. This heterogeneity results from the high degree of pore inhomogeneity in the microvugular carbonate system. Although estimates of the turbulence effect can be obtained by gas-well tests, it is helpful to measure this parameter in the laboratory in order to establish turbulence factor-permeability correlations. The investigation had two goals: (1) to establish a turbulence factor-permeability correlation for microvugular carbonates, and (2) to determine the effect of a static second phase (interstitial water or condensate) in the pores on this correlation. The liquid saturation around the wellbore can be increased by mechanisms such as mud-filtrate invasion, water coning, acidizing, or retrograde condensation (Gewers and Nichol, 1969). Such knowledge will help to improve the predictability of gas-well performance in microvugular carbonate reservoirs by correctly evaluating the additional pressure drop resulting from turbulence. Turner Valley carbonates. Gewers and Nichol (1969) selected a suite of carbonate cores from the Turner Valley Member of the Mississippian Rundle Formation, Alberta, western Canada. The samples were chosen to cover the formation's permeability range. The dry flow test procedure consisted of measuring the stabilized flow rate of nitrogen for various input pressures ranging from 1 to 11 atmospheres (1.03 11.36 kg/cm2). Input pressures below 1 atm were found to give rise to laminar flow, and were used by Gewers and Nichol (1969) to evaluate the Klinkenberg effect. In a second set of tests, glycerine was chosen to be the stationary liquid phase in the cores. Glycerine has a low vapor pressure, high viscosity, proper wettability (it wets the mineral surface as does water), and a static spatial distribution during gas flow that is close to that of water. Water was rejected owing to the ability of a gas to pick up water (even if the gas is saturated) as it expands during flow through the core's pore system. The mathematical basis for the experiments is the Forchheimer's equation: dp
pV
dL
k
+ flpV 2,
(5-139)
wherep is the pressure, L is the core length, p is the absolute viscosity, k is the permeability, fl is the turbulence factor, p is the gas density, and V is the velocity of the gas. Equation 5-139 incorporates laminar, inertial, and turbulent flow effects and is a general momentum balance equation for steady-state flow. The first term is the normal
473 Darcy term and holds for viscous flow. The second term is the one that corrects for the turbulence effects and is a constant for any given rock sample. Gewers and Nichol (1969) used the following integral of Eq. 5-139 to calculate the turbulence factor from measured laboratory data: 2
2
mw(pl-P2 ) 2ZRTpL(M/A)
--
M[3 1 Al.t k +
(5-140)
where, mw is the molecular weight of the gas, p~ is the inlet pressure, P2 is the outlet pressure, M is the mass flow rate, Z is the gas deviation factor, R is the universal gas constant (per mole), T is the gas absolute temperature, and A is the cross-sectional area of the core. Both 13and k are the only unknown parameters to be determined from the tests. Equation 5-140 is used by plotting the left side against the term M/Ap for a number of flow rates. The slope of the resulting straight line is the turbulence factor and the intercept is the reciprocal of the permeability (Gewers and Nichol, 1969). Figure 5-121A shows the dry-air turbulence results for the vugular Turner Valley carbonates. Gewers and Nichol's (1969) results yielded the same type of turbulence factor-permeability correlation as obtained by Katz (1959), Sadiq (1965), and Firoozabadi and Katz (1979). The log of the turbulence factor is inversely proportional to the log of permeability. The difference is that the turbulence factor for the vugular carbonates is as much as one order of magnitude higher, and can be attributed to the high degree of heterogeneity in these carbonate cores.
Turbulence factor. Results of the liquid saturation tests are shown in Fig. 5-12 lB. The magnitude of the turbulence factor varies with the static liquid saturation. As the saturation of the static second phase increases, the turbulence factor first decreases (SL= 0 to 10%) and then rapidly increases (SL > 10%), whereas the permeability decreases (SL= 0 to 10%), remains essentially constant (SL= 10 to 20%), and then increases (SL= 20 to 30%). The behavior of the microvugular carbonate system suggests that the turbulence factor-permeability correlation should be tested for each reservoir. Gewers and Nichol (1969) remarked that it is fortunate that the linearity of the slope (as shown in Fig. 5121) indicates that the data can be obtained with a minimum of laboratory work. The significance of knowing the turbulence factor accurately is stressed by Gewers and Nichol (1969). If the value of the turbulence factor in evaluating a gas well is too low, then actual field tests (absolute open flow tests) will yield a lower flow capacity than predicted by calculation. In most cases, the well is often suspected of being damaged. If this damage is non-existent, then the well cannot be expected to show a better performance. The turbulence factor must be considered in evaluating acidizing techniques. Gewers and Nichol (1969) pointed out that it is not enough to look at the effect on permeability alone. In their study, an increase in permeability or a decrease in liquid saturation below 20% not only increased production but also reduced the turbulence factor. This tends to compound the increase in production. Any factor that damages the well or raises liquid saturation over 10% will decrease production by both reducing
474 ~t
L
"
:_
.
IT
L_.i ;-r-lq ~ iii7 i !
~ ! t'! + !. ~. . .i. . .
. . . . .
i
§
1 ..... L_:--L-'.LI.:
' i i" !!+~
!
I ii,l~z
.
.
9
I
.
.
'
.
:;
"
'--L ' , i . . "KATZ'S HANOIIOOK ' pOrOl*fy porolaty
I0
tO0
ABSOLUTE P(RMEAOILITY
Oa
o
I[Irlrl[r
KgoS (inCl.)
nO
P(mU(AII01,.II"T !'0 GAS
nO0 (rod1
Fig. 5-121. Turbulence factor vs. permeability for low-permeable carbonate cores from the Turner Valley Member of the Rundle Formation, Alberta, Canada. (A) - Dry-air turbulence factors of vugular carbonates; (B) - Effect of a static liquid on turbulence factor. (After Gewers and Nichol, 1969, figs. 3 and 4; reprinted with the permission of Petroleum Society of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum.)
475 permeability and increasing turbulence. Calculated gas-well productivity and hence the desirability of a workover can be seriously misjudged if the wrong correlation is used (Gewers and Nichol, 1969).
Solution and external gas-drive model flow tests Jodry (1992) in Volume 1 of this two-volume book explained in detail the use of capillary pressure data to obtain an accurate description of carbonate pore systems. Stewart et al. (1953 and 1954) performed model flow performance tests on limestone cores that also provide valuable information on carbonate pore structure and oil recovery. The degree of divergence between the gas-oil relative permeability relationships calculated from solution or extemal gas drive tests is an indication of pore structure heterogeneity. The results of their laboratory work are especially pertinent here in the light of foregoing discussions.
Laboratory andfield performance characteristics. In Stewart et al.'s (1953) laboratory investigation, solution gas-drive and extemal gas-drive tests were conducted on 2.5- to 3.5-in. (6.25-- 8.75-cm)-diameter limestone cores. The results of the flow tests showed minor divergence between the k / k curves calculated from the extemalgas-drive test and the solution-gas-drive tests. They found the extent of this divergence to be indicative of the carbonate rock type. With respect to intergranular limestones, the solution and external-gas-drive k/k data were in close agreement. g o For rock samples having vugular porosity or fracture-matrix porosity, the respective k/k curves diverged to varying degrees, depending on the nature of the multipleg o , porosity development. The flow tests also showed that dead-end or storage pores exist in some intergranular limestones. Figures 5-122, 5-123, and 5-124 (from Stewart et al., 1953), indicate gas-drive performance for limestone cores possessing intergranular-intercrystalline, vugular, and fracture-matrix porosities. The relation between the extemal-gas-drive and solution-gas-drive k/k curves for different rock types typifies the qualitative correlation g o between the gas drive and type of pore system. F~gure 5-122 shows a close agreement between the k/k curves for two different drives with an intergranular pore system. g o Model flow test data presented in Fig. 5-122 are also compared to k / k values calculated from solution-gas-drive field performance data. There is a close match. In Fig. 5-123, the two reef limestone cores having vugular porosity exhibit substantial deviation in the curves. The fractured limestone has the greatest divergence in the k/k curves as shown by the test results in Fig. 5-124. g o Results from this study show that the laboratory-measured gas-oil flow behavior of uniform-type porosity limestones is essentially the same for a test simulating a field solution-gas drive as for one simulating an external-gas drive. For non-uniform porosity type limestones, however, a significant difference in gas-oil flow behavior was observed by Stewart et al. (1954) during a Solution-gas-drive test. Effect of bubble formation on oil recovery by solution-gas drive. Stewart et al. (1954) analyzed laboratory results of gas-drive tests with respect to the formation of gas bubbles during the depletion process in limestones having non-uniform porosity. Oil recovery performance depended directly on the number of gas bubbles formed,
476 I0
i
o
x
o"
i
m
I--
/
tZ:
x
=
>I,...J =O
/
/
x
I/
/i'y i I
14.1
==
....J
x
*l
i
@
0 MODEL
SOLUTION
,,~"'-
x MODEL
EXTERNAL
""-"
FIEL
O
SOLUTION
=
.Oa
DRIVE DRIVE DRIVE
,,
I
(1) ,r (..9
~176
i
2'0
i|
sb
,b
i
so
60
GAS SATURATION, PERCENT PORE VOLUME Fig. 5-122. Comparison of gas-drive performance of a limestone core having intergranular porosity under laboratory external-gas- and solution-gas-drive tests and solution-gas- drive field data. (After Stewart et al., 1953, fig. 5; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
and the displacement operation was shown to be contingent on the formation of gas bubbles within the pores of the limestone itself. Stewart et al. (1954) attributed the formation of gas bubbles to the oil containing more dissolved gas than would be predicted from PVT relationships (supersaturated state). Figure 5-125 shows data that are quite typical of this condition. The gas in the external-drive mechanism is injected from an outside source. Stewart et al. (1954) explained that in an external-gas-drive reservoir having fracture-matrix porosity, the gas will channel through portions of the fracture system, resulting in a highly inefficient displacement of oil. Under conditions of solution-gas drive, the gas will also channel through the fissures and larger
477 iO
o
o"
I
r #/
>. I,-._1 ill
~x
r I
O.q",x
~'I ~,'
.O>J
( ,,
W
,i ..I
o
w Q. W > l-
]
i
0 MODEL SOLUTION DRIVE
/ i
_1 0
-,-,-~,, X MODEL EXTERNAL DRIVE
r
.o,
I
(.9
.OOt
0
I0 GAS
"
20
SATURATION,
30 PERCENT
40 PORE
50
60
VOLUME
Fig. 5-123. Comparison of gas-drive performance on two reef limestone cores under laboratory externalgas- and solution-gas-drive tests. (After Stewart et al., 1953, fig. 7; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
pore throats as the bubbles unite to form a continuous free gas phase. As a result, a solution-gas drive will be more efficient than extemal-gas drive in rocks with vugs and fracture-matrix porosity. Stewart et al. (1954) also found that differences ranging up to twofold in oil recovery could be obtained by varying the test conditions. The variations in test results were substantial for rocks with vugs and fracture-matrix pores, and only minor for rocks with intergranular porosity. For limestones having nonuniform porosity, the following parameters influenced the gas-drive results: (1) rate of pressure decline, (2) original bubble point pressure of the gas-oil solution, (3) oil viscosity, and (4) gas
478 I0
o
i
#r ,/
0 I--
/
>I.J 03
f,
/=
i
X
#
w
,.
u.I
/,
!
/
w
/
I,-. _J w ..J 0
/,
:
I
/
_
I
------- O MODEL
SOLUTION
DRIVE
--..~.
EXTERNAL
DRIVE
=
x MODEL
-_
=
.---
,
.OI- i
I
!
I
I
.i~1. 0
,o '
2'0
s'o
4 0'
5'0
"so
GAS SATURATION, PERCENT PORE VOLUME Fig. 5-124. Comparison of gas-drive performance in fractured limestone core under laboratory externalgas- and solution- gas-drive tests. (After Stewart et al., 1953, fig. 8; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
solubility characteristics. The greater the rate of pressure decline, the larger the number of gas bubbles formed. Laboratory tests showed that an increase in the pressure rate decline by a factor of 10 results in the formation of 10 times as many bubbles. Solution-gas-drive recovery will increase in rocks having nonuniform porosity with an increase in the number of bubbles. The reasoning is that the oil recovery from storage pores of rocks with nonuniform porosity will occur only when gas bubbles form in the storage pores. Only a part of the total gas saturation is, therefore, responsible for the observed gas/oil ratio performance in non-uniform porosity limestones.
479 I0
F
o
EXTERNAL i
i
Jr
r
GAS DRIVE
ob
C)"
IL
i
I,,,,, i
n,, >,, I,,-, ,...,,.
SOLUTION
_,I
,,el:
W O.
.I
!
-
.
/
1K
.J
o
I
~.01
L__ j
J
i ,
GAS
DRIVE
A
/
/
/'/ ' A
/
o
/
j/o
GAS DRIVE B
J
lO UJ
SOLUTION
./~_
,.
,
,.
I.,9 o
o
=
I
o
/
/
o =
.OOI L
0
I0
20 GAS
SATURATION,
30
40 PERCENT
50 PORE
60
70
VOLUME
Fig. 5-125. Relative permeability characteristics of a limestone core, from the midcontinent U.S.A., having a non-uniform pore system. Permeability is 1 mD and average porosity is 30%. Curve A is a methane and C~0-Ct2 mixture having a bubble point pressure of 200 psig (1.4 MPa), and curve B is a methane and C~0-C~2mixture having a bubble point pressure of 1000 psig (6.9 MPa). (After Stewart et al., 1954, fig. 2; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
Significance of the modelflow tests. Laboratory solutions-gas-drive tests in carbonate rocks usually demonstrate more favorable recoveries than those anticipated in actual practice because fewer bubbles form at the rates of pressure decline that exist in the field. Increases in oil recovery by using this technique may be feasible under the proper conditions. This question is but one aspect of the issue of appropriate oil production rates in carbonate reservoirs. Stewart et al. (1954) realized that there is no practical test to measure, in the laboratory, the solution-gas-drive oil recovery performance at field rates of pressure decline. They postulated that laboratory external-gas-drive data can be
480 used to make a conservative prediction of field solution-gas-drive performance for limestone reservoirs with non-uniform porosity. Production rate effect on recovery is discussed in the following section, which presents some theoretical and practical aspects of carbonate reservoir performance. Stewart et al. (1953) also conducted similar gas-drive experiments on sandstone cores. The relative permeability relationships were identical under both extemalgas- and solution-gas-drive conditions in all cases. A comparison was made between a more uniform pore structure exhibited by the sandstones, to a less uniform pore structure in the limestones. It appears that in rocks having uniform porosity the pores act as fluid conductors as well as fluid storage spaces. It is not necessary, therefore, for gas bubbles to form in the pore spaces themselves, as the gas evolved upstream is able to enter essentially all the individual pores to achieve oil displacement. A close examination of the pore structure of the limestone sample, the k g/ k o curves of which are presented in Fig. 5-122, indicated intergranular porosity. Many of the passages between the original fragments, however, have been sealed off by cementation resulting in the formation of storage pores. As a result, the externalgas-drive k / k curve is slightly less favorable than the solution-gas-drive k / k curve shown in l~lg. 5-122. Similar k.g/ k o curves results were obtained by Johnson and Sweeney (1973) for limestones m their study on measuring flow heterogeneity quantitatively in these samples using air to replace refined kerosene. Their method for measuring and expressing the flow path heterogeneity of laboratory core samples was based on a conceptual cylindrical tube model. The model was composed of 50 parallel flow paths (tubes), each containing 2% of the pore volume and of constant cross-sectional area. Their model was similar to the tube model shown in Fig. 5-77, which was constructed from a Sierpinski carpet. No cross flow was assumed owing to the implementation of an equal viscosity, equal density piston-like miscible displacement in each tube. They concluded that there is a general correlation where the higher values of the relative permeability ratio accompany greater flow path heterogeneity. In conclusion the degree of divergence between the solution-gas-drive k g/ k o and external-gas-drive k g/ k o should be a good measure of heterogeneity of the pore system. Waterflooding operations in these limestone reservoirs will not be as successful as planned as the degree of divergence between the kg/ko values increases. The injected water will have a tendency to sweep out less oil from the pores due to the heterogeneity of the pore system.
Some theoretical and practical aspects of carbonate reservoir performance The prudent management of oil and gas reservoirs is crucial to judging risks and maximizing returns of exploration, development, and production operation investments. A continuous theme of these two volumes is that much of the theory and many of the practices acceptable for sandstone reservoirs do not always apply to carbonate reservoirs. Next discussion focuses on the application of this know-how to the fieldoriented solutions of production problems.
481
Trapped gas saturations in carbonate formations Both gas reservoirs with a naturally-occurring underlying aquifer and aquifer gas storage projects offer possibilities for large volumes of gas to be trapped and not recovered. This trapping has been documented to occur in various carbonate rock types (Kellan and Pugh, 1973) and sandstones (Geffen et al., 1952). Gas trapping results from gas-water capillary forces that become active as production occurs and water encroaches into pores that previously contained water and gas.
Testing configuration. Kellan and Pugh (1973) investigated trapped gas in the laboratory by testing suites of cores from five carbonate formations (Cretaceous Austin Chalk Formation, Jurassic Smackover Formation, Permian Abo Formation, Pennsylvanian Lansing-Kansas City Group and Silurian Niagaran Formation). The testing scheme for defining the magnitude of trapped gas, which could exist in these carbonate reservoirs, attempted to correlate this phenomenon with porosity, permeability, and carbonate rock type. The samples covered the porosity and permeability range within each field tested. Cores from five Smackover reservoirs located in the states of Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi and Texas, U.S.A., were selected in order to examine differences in trapped gas, which might occur within a stratigraphic unit distributed over a large geographical area. The core samples from the Smackover ranged from extremely fine-grained, uniform dolomite to a coarse-grained, poorlysorted oolitic limestone. Kellan and Pugh (1973) classified the carbonate samples from thin-sections based on Archie's rock type, where Type I is composed of a compact crystalline matrix, Type II is a rock with a chalky matrix, and Type III rock has a sucrosic matrix. Differentiation of the capillary pressure-saturation curves, obtained from core testing using both air-water restored state and air-mercury techniques, yielded histograms showing the distribution of pore-entry radii as a function of pore space. Pore sizes in the carbonate samples tested ranged from "A" (0.01 mm) to "D" (> 1.0 mm) sizes as defined in the Archie system (Archie, 1952; Jodry, 1992) (Table 5XXVI). The study employed Pickell et al.'s (1966) technique for determining the trapped gas saturation. Experimental results. Table 5-XXVI presents the results of Kellan and Pugh' s (1973) tests. Core samples, for the most part, were 1.5-in. (3.75-cm) in diameter; a few were only 1-in. (2.5-cm) in diameter. Figure 5-126 presents a cross-plot of porosity vs. trapped gas saturation for an initial gas saturation of 80% of pore space. Trapped gas saturations varied from 23% to 68% of the pore space in cores containing 80% initial gas saturations. The data show that the pore throat connections, as reflected by matrix characteristics, are more important than total porosity. Archie's rock types I and II have trapped gas essentially independent of porosity. Trapped gas values for mixed rock types were, in many cases, no higher ( 3 8 . 9 - 80%) than for those reservoirs that contained only one rock type (Table 5-XXVI). Type II carbonates had a favorable gas saturation of about 30% pore space, whereas Type I samples had saturations exceeding 52% pore space. Archie's Type III samples exhibited a greater dependence on porosity. The data showed that the trapped gas increased as porosity decreased within Type II sucrosic and oolitic reservoirs. Kellan and Pugh (1973) noted that there is a general trend of increasing
482 TABLE 5-XXVI Basic data on the core samples from various carbonate reservoir rocks located in the U.S.A. Samples without numbers are the previous samples tested at 20 and 50% initial gas saturation values. Rock type refers to Archie's classification of carbonate rocks, where L (large grains > 0.5 mm), M (medium grains: 0 . 2 5 - 0.5 mm), F (fine grains: 0 . 1 2 5 - 0.25 mm), VF (very fine grains: 0 . 0 6 2 5 - 0.125 mm), and XF (extremely fine grains <0.0625 mm). Visible porosity is divided into four classes: A, not visible under 10x magnification; B, visible under 10x magnification; C, visible to the naked eye; and D, pore size greater than most drill cuttings indicated by secondary crystal growth on faces of cuttings Sample number
Porosity (%)
Permeability (mD)
Gas saturation Initial Final 80 80 50 20 80 80 50 20 80
31.8 33.3 29.5 14.5 30.0 34.5 30.1 14.6 55.5
80 80 80 50 20 80 50 20 80
40.2 38.9 39.9 30.0 14.7 40.3 30.0 16.3 44.4
80 80 50 20 80 50 20 80 80
37.0 43.0 36.0 16.8 50 39 18.9 45.5 49.0
IIIfm B IIIfc B/IA
80 50 20 80 80 50 20 80 80 80
33.9 27.8 13.3 39.7 43.9 33.1 14.0 44.8 42.3 41.9
IIIxfvfB
Rock type
Smackover Formation (Texas) 1 2
34 31.1
549 313
3 4
26.7 23.8
108 59
5
20.9
14
IIIvfB IIIvfB
IIIfvfB IIIfm B
IIIvf/Ixf C
Smackover Formation (Arkansas) 6 7 8
21.7 21.7 20.6
302 35 116
9
19.9
6.1
10
17.5
1.0
IIIvf BC/IAB IIIxfBC/IA IIIvfBC/IA
IIIxf AB/IA
IIIxf A
Smackover Formation (Mississippi) 11 12
17.8 13.7
408 141
13
10.2
33
14 15
11.1 8.2
3.2 62
IA/IIIfc B
IIIfB/IA IA/IIIm B
Smackover Formation (Florida Area) 16
27.0
135
17 18
23.9 17.0
30 14
19 20 21
13.9 12.6 21.9
5.6 1.1 100
IIIxfvf A IIIxfvf A
IIIxfvf A IIIxfvf A IIIvfB
483 Sample number
Porosity
("/I
Permeability (mD)
Gas saturation Initial Final
22
21.3
245
23
19.2
40
24 25
15.0 10.2
60
80 50 20 80 50 20 80 80
46.1 34.3 16.9 44.5 32.9 16.2 49 53.8
80 80 50 20 80 50 20 80 80
30.5 30.4 26.0 12.3 29.8 30.0 12.2 23.4 30.4
IIxf AB IIxf BC
80 50 20 80 80 80 50 20 80
48.2 34.4 16.5 41.7 61.7 53.2 38.6 19.7 65.9
IIIf BCiIxf A
80 50 20 80 80 80 50 20 80
52.5 37.0 17.0 61.0 65.0 63.9 41.7 17.5 62.6
Ixf CD
80 50 20 80 50 20 80 80 80
68.5 44.2 17.9 66.8 43.6 17.3 62.3 67.2 68.1
Chalk Formation 26 36.5 27 32.3 28
30.7
29 30
28.9 21.8
4.1
59 104 15 7.1 1.7
Niagaran Formation 31 15.8
122
32 33 34
13.4 8.9 8.2
20 228 17
35
3.6
Abo Formation 36 13.0
5.7 500
37 38 39
11.7 10.1 6.3
39 45 4.3
40
5.7
9.4
Lansing-Kansas City Formation 41 28.9
222
42
25.1
39
43
24.9 22.4 22.1
550 5.7 9.0
44 45
Rock type IIIvf B IIIvf B IIIvf B IIIfvf BA
IIxf A IIxf A IIxf A
Ixf CiIIIf B Ixf CD Ixf CiIIIf B Ixf c
Ixf CD Ixf CD Ixf CD Ixf CD Ixf c Ixf CD Ixf c Ixf c Ixf c
Source: After Keelan and Pugh, 1973, table 2; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.
484 40
I
I
l
l
i
!
l
. 1
1
1
!
I
38 36 34
\ , \~~
32 3O
\ \ TYPE\ rrr \
o
28 26
TYPE I co
\
0
\
~24
.\
~22 9. 2 0 >,-
\
Legend
or)
SNACKOVER
o16
TEXAS
0
(a. 14 12 lo 8
6
\
9
\
" \\
\, \
\ ,~o
ARXANSAS
J
MISSISSIPPI
I~I
FLORIDA
'm,
FLORIOA
0
0
0
\,
\o
ABO
9
NIAGARAN LANSING CHALK
9
\
* 0
9 9
l
4 II
2 0
,.
0
L
10
t
t
20
[
~_ 1
30
l
00
lg _._ ,__ l / I l I 8 I/lI!_~ r~ [ l -~
ICO
40
60
50
1
t
t
]
70
80
TRAPPEDGAS PERCENTPORESPACE Fig. 5-126. Laboratory-determined relationships between the trapped gas, porosity, and Archie's rock types (I, II, III, III/I and I/III) for various carbonate reservoirs in the U.S.A. Initial gas saturation was 80% o f the pore space. (After Keelan and Pugh, 1973, fig. 11; reprinted with the permission o f the Society o f Petroleum Engineers.)
trapped gas with decreasing porosity on both intra- and inter-reservoir scales (Table 5-XXVI and Fig. 5-126). Their laboratory data also indicated that trapped gas is a function of the initial gas saturation. Different correlations were attempted to relate trapped gas, as a function of the initial gas saturations, to porosity, permeability, and a combination of the two. None of these parameters were entirely satisfactory. However, two other approaches, where one corresponded to the irreducible water saturation and the other to common initial gas saturation, appeared to be viable. The latter approach improved the correlation as demonstrated by Fig. 5-126 (Kellan and Pugh, 1973). Each core sample had a variable irreducible water saturation (Sir) and the corresponding initial gas saturation depends upon the pore geometry. An initial water saturation of 20% pore space was
485 selected to remove the variable of irreducible water. Actual S i r values were, for the most part, within 10% (higher or lower) of the chosen 20% value. Kellan and Pugh (1973) extrapolated the trapped gas values to 20% initial water saturation using the initial vs. trapped gas saturation curve shapes available on two cores from each of the reservoirs studied. Their tests also yielded additional trapped saturation values for initial gas saturation at 50% of the pore space in each one of the cores.
Importance to carbonate reservoirs and aquifer gas storage projects. The application of Kellan and Pugh's (1973) results would be important to select the number of gas reservoirs where large amounts of gas could be trapped and not recovered. The results, however, are very important in aquifer gas storage projects. They tested two cores from each reservoirs to yield additional information on trapped gas saturations using initial gas saturation values of 20 and 50%. The carbonate reservoirs which exhibit gas trapping have a low permeability and a high capillary pressure, or limited structural relief where most of the reservoir is underlain by water. These conditions can result in an appreciable transition zone where variable amounts of gas will be trapped as water moves upward in the reservoir (Kellan and Pugh, 1973). If a relatively large portion of a naturally-occurring reservoir is at an irreducible water saturation and has a limited gas-water transition zone, it tends not to have a problem with trapped gas. The fluid configuration results from a large density difference between the two fluids and there has been a significant amount of geologic time to allow the separation of the gas and water. Under these conditions, most of the reservoir exists at the irreducible water saturation and the trapped gas values at other saturations are not important (Kellan and Pugh, 1973). The fluid distribution in gas storage aquifers tends to be more complex. Reasons for this condition are: (1) the equilibrium time between the two fluids is significantly shorter than geologic time, and (2) the injection-withdrawal sequence complicates the fluid distribution in the reservoir. Kellan and Pugh (1973) stated that the total reservoir may exist at varying gas saturations, with lower saturations at increasing distance from the injection wellbore. Water encroaches to replace the gas at the time of gas withdrawal resulting in variable trapped gas volumes, which would be less than if the carbonate reservoir was at an irreducible water saturation. Solution-gas-drive and gas-cap-drive reservoirs The performance of carbonate reservoirs under solution-gas-drive or gas-cap-drive varies over a wide range, depending on the nature of the producing zone. Figures 1-10 to 1-15 in Chapter I present the general field k / k behavior of reservoirs having (1) intergranular, (2) vuggy, and (3) fracture-matrix porosities. The performance of reservoirs with intergranular-intercrystalline porosity resembles closely that of sandstone reservoirs with similar k/k g o curves and ultimate oil recovery. Reservoirs with vuggy porosity may have lower ultimate recoveries owing to less favorable and more unpredictable kg/ko behavior. Finally, reservoirs having fracture-matrix porosity proved to be the most difficult to evaluate because of very erratic performance. These reservoirs generally have low ultimate recoveries owing to low-permeability host rock, even though the existence of fractures greatly increases permeabilities. Carbonate reservoirs
486 with nonuniform porosity typically have kg/k o c u r v e s with low equilibrium gas saturations that sometimes approach zero. The low recoveries are due in part to the inefficient displacement of the oil contained in the pores by the solution-gas bubbles and the gas coming from outside the oil zone. In addition, it appears that gravity segregation of fluids in the secondary channels, particularly the fractures, may play an important role in the production process. In a highly-fractured reservoir the fracture system may, at least at low withdrawal rates, act as an effective oil and gas separator. On emitting from the matrix, the oil and gas separate, with the gas migrating upward to form a secondary gas cap in some cases. Fluid segregation in the fractures may have a pronounced effect on reservoir performance.
Fractured reservoir performance. Pirson (1953), in considering the problem from a theoretical standpoint, assumed a highly-fractured reservoir model with a low matrix and high fracture permeability, both horizontally and vertically. Under these conditions, the nature of the fluid segregation and its effect on ultimate oil recovery were examined. Pirson calculated the theoretical reservoir performance for various types of fluid segregation. He used an average k / k curve for a group of dolomite reservoirs with an equilibrium gas saturation of about 7%. For slmphclty, the productmn process was viewed as a succession of depletion stages separated by shut-in periods. During these periods, the static and capillary pressures reached equilibrium in both the matrix and the fracture system.As a result, fluid saturation readjusts in the reservoir's pore system during the shut-in periods. Several degrees of segregation were considered in the theoretical calculations: (1) no segregation of oil and gas in a simple depletion performance; (2) segregation from the upper 90of the reservoir, with enough oil draining downdip to resaturate the lower 88of the zone during the shut-in periods to 90% liquid saturation; (3) comparable to case 2, but with the oil draining from the upper 89of the reservoir to resaturate the lower 89of the zone; and (4) comparable with cases 2 and 3, but with oil coming from the upper 88of the reservoir to replenish the lower 90of the zone. As expected, there is a decrease in calculated ultimate oil recovery and an attendant increase in peak gas/oil ratio in going from case 1 to case 4. The respective ultimate oil recoveries and peak gas/oil ratios, progressing from case 1 to case 4, are: 27.0% and 7,500 ft3/bbl, 20.8% and 12,000 ft3/bbl, 14.5% and 37,000 ft3/bbl, and 9.6% and 83,000 ft3/bbl. In view of the continuous fracture system assumed, a kg/ko curve with an equilibrium gas saturation approaching zero would be more realistic. Under this circumstance, Pirson's (1953) calculated ultimate recoveries would be reduced by one-quarter to one-half. Most of the kg/ko curves for carbonate reservoirs suggest lower values for equilibrium gas saturation than those in sandstones. Another phenomenon mentioned by Pirson (1953), Elkins and Skov (1963) and Stewart et al. (1953) is the possible reduction in oil recovery in fractured carbonate reservoirs caused by the capillary end effect. This condition develops at the effiux end of a core in the laboratory or at the end of matrix block in the reservoir. Hadley and Handy (1956), in a theoretical and experimental study, stated that the end effect is caused by the discontinuity in capillary pressure when the flowing fluids leave the 9
g
o
.
.
.
.
487 porous medium and abruptly enter a region with no capillary pressure. The capillary pressure discontinuity tends to decrease the rate of effiux of the preferentially wetting phase. They compared the amount of oil expelled from the core or matrix blocks to the rate of efflux of the nonwetting phase or the gas phase. Accordingly, oil tends to accumulate near the edges of the blocks. Laboratory experiments show that the end effect becomes less important at higher flow rates. Figure 5-127 presents a comparison between the observed and the calculated saturation distribution in a core at various flow rates under conditions approaching steady state. At higher flow rates, oil recovery increases and the oil saturation buildup becomes more localized toward the outlet end of the core. The overall effect of the capillary end effect in a fractured reservoir is to decrease oil recovery and to increase the average gas/oil ratio during the life of the reservoir. At the flow rates experienced in the field, the end effect is normally unimportant. It probably would be significant only in extensively fractured zones where the dimensions of the matrix blocks are on the order of several inches rather than several feet (Elkins and Slov, 1963). A possible solution to the problems of gravity segregation and end effect is to attempt to prevent them developing, which can be accomplished by producing the wells at high drawdown rates. High producing rates must be compatible with water aO0
I
0
l-Z L~ 0
80,
LLI IX.
a
60"
~
40"'
u') J
~ 20
9
GAS F L O W R A T E o .0~3~ CC/SEC A .189
CC/SEC
9 4.6,5 CC/ SEC 0 0
.2
DISTANCE
.4
FROM
~ .6
.8
1.0
INLET END OF CORE, FT
Fig. 5-127. Comparison of observed and calculated fluid distribution in a core for a gas-oil system at various flow rates. (After Hadley and Handy, 1956, reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
488 influx and market demand considerations. Under high horizontal pressure gradients, oil and gas flowing from the matrix blocks may move more directly to the producing wells, thus reducing fluid segregation and end effects.
Withdrawal Rate of Recovery- Solution-Gas-Drive The original concept of the maximum efficient rate of recovery was originally depicted by Buckley (1951). He stated that excessive rates of withdrawals lead to rapid decline of reservoir pressure, to the release of dissolved gas, and creation of an irregularity in the boundary between the invaded and non-invaded sections of the reservoir. Furthermore, (1) gas and water are dissipated, (2) trapping and by-passing of oil occurs, and (3) in extreme cases, there is a complete loss of demarcation between the invaded and non-invaded parts of the reservoir, with dominance of the entire recovery by inefficient dissolved-gas drive. Each of the above effects of excessive withdrawal rates reduces ultimate oil recovery. It was further pointed out by Buckley (1951) that for each reservoir there is (for the chosen dominant drive mechanism) a maximum production rate which will permit reasonable fulfillment of the basic requirements for efficient recovery. Lee et al. (1974) pointed out that Buckley's concept was formulated when conservation concepts were being developed. Enhanced recovery technology or pressure maintenance were not universally practiced by the industry. The only means by which to maintain efficient recovery was to exercise rate control to achieve the benefits of the most efficient natural drive mechanism. Additional field evidence is needed to support a broad conclusion that an increased oil recovery results from the high withdrawal rates (or maximum efficient rate) in carbonate reservoirs under solution-gas drive. Stewart et al. (1953) conducted similar gas-drive experiments on sandstone cores. The relative permeability relationships were identical under both extemal-gas- and solution-gas-drive conditions in all cases. It appears that in rocks having uniform porosity the pores act as fluid conductors as well as fluid storage spaces. It is not necessary, therefore, for gas bubbles to form in the pore spaces themselves, as the gas evolved upstream is able to enter essentially all the individual pores to achieve oil displacement. The recovery from carbonates can vary several-fold from 12 to 58% based on the laboratory solution-gas-drive tests (Stewart et al., 1953).Also carbonates exhibit great differences in gas-oil relative permeabilities between the solution- and gas-drives. These differences indicate the inadvisability of extrapolating field solution-gas-drive performance to predict the external gas-drive performance as shown in Fig. 5-122. Jones-Parra and Reytor (1959) mathematically modeled the effect of fluid segregation in the fracture system on carbonate reservoir production performance and ultimate recovery. The model consisted of an idealized network having a high-permeability matrix with no gravity segregation (Figure 5-20). The porosities of the reservoir were divided into two broad types in accordance with their assumed effects on fluid distribution and flow. The coarse porosity is presented on the left side, where gravity segregation is believed to take place freely and the resistance to flow is very low. Fine porosity is presented on the right-hand side, where there is a high resistance to flow with relative permeability characteristics similar to those of a low-permeable sandstone. Gravity segregation does not occur here. Using the model's assumptions, it is possible to recover more oil by producing at high rather than at low gas/oil ratios. In
489 this manner, the fine porosity is drained more effectively. Overall production declines less when producing at the higher k / k values in spite of the fact that at any given stage of depletion, the pressures areglower. Jones-Parra and Reytor's (1959) purely mathematical treatment supports the contention that higher withdrawal rates at increased gas/oil ratios may enhance oil recovery in some instances (Fig. 5-20). Needless to say, the validity of these conclusions depends, as in all simulation studies, on how well the particular model used represents actual carbonate reservoir conditions. Inasmuch as matrix porosity and fracture networks may exist as an integral system, such a model could be an oversimplification of the complex conditions existing in many carbonate reservoirs. In fact, Jones-Parra and Reytor's (1959) results appear to contradict the inferences drawn by Elkins (1946) on the basis of observations of a limited number of carbonate reservoirs. He stated that the faster production rate in the Harper Field (San Andres Formation), west Texas, U.S.A., probably caused less favorable recovery characteristics than did the slower production rate in the Penwell Field (San Andres Formation), west Texas, U.S.A. (see curves 8 and 9, Fig. 1-10). Water- and gravity-drive reservoirs The concept of the maximum efficient rate in water and gravity drives operating in carbonate reservoirs also has changed considerably since Buckley (1951) comments. This is due to significant advancements, which challenged and changed reservoir management techniques during the past 40 years. Current field practice assures control of the most efficient recovery mechanism throughout the life of a reservoir. Universally instituted EOR schemes can supplement or replace inefficient recovery mechanisms. In the previous discussions, the writers have shown that the greatest impact has come from advancements in quantifying complex fluid-flow problems associated with carbonate reservoirs. Computer simulations provide production data from the combined effects of pressure decline, gravity, imbibition, viscous forces, fluid properties, and fluid movement in the reservoir. Lee et al. (1974) showed that for the displacement mechanisms in typical westem Canadian carbonate reservoirs, there is no definable depletion rate, within the practical range, above which recovery begins to deteriorate. Doubling the withdrawal rates in the high-relief carbonate reservoirs, subjected to gravity control, has little effect on the ultimate recovery. The magnitude of the effect that permeability and relative permeability have on gravity drives in highrelief reservoirs is shown by Beveridge et al.'s (1969) computer model studies. Withdrawal rate of recovery - w a t e r drive. Multidimensional, multiphase mathematical simulator studies and performance analyses of western Canadian carbonate reservoirs indicated that recovery is improved when pool and well rates are increased, provided the desired water displacement mechanism is maintained (Lee et al., 1974). The increased recovery at increased production rates is attributed to the operator's ability to cycle more water through the reservoir prior to reaching the economic limit. In their model study, Lee et al. (1974) used depletion rates that varied from 1 - 50% of ultimate reserves per year. These rates far exceed the limits for normal withdrawal rates used in western Canadian carbonate reservoirs. It should be noted that whereas
490 better recoveries were obtained at low rates at a given water/oil ratio or a given water throughput, in all of Lee et al.'s model scenarios improved recovery to the economic limit was achieved at increased withdrawal rates. The models showed that there was no definable maximum rate within the practical economic depletion rates at which recovery begins to decrease for these carbonate reservoirs. Lee et al.'s (1974) mathematical model studies analyzed the sensitivity of ultimate recovery to well producing rates for selected reservoirs in the Upper Devonian Leduc and Beaverhill Lake formations of westem Canada. The majority of Canadian carbonate reservoirs are found in these two formations and have the greatest potential for future increases in production rates. These reservoirs, therefore, are significant and have to be considered in any assessment of the effect of rate on recovery. Different variations of the Leduc coning model were used to investigate the raterecovery relationship for bottom-water-drive pools. Reservoir conditions that could be indicative of water coning are: (1) high vertical permeability, (2) presence of a water contact across the entire reservoir, (3) high production rates; (4) high GOR or WOR ratios, and (5) the resulting high bottomhole pressure drawdowns. Oil production, controlled by water coning at the economic limit, determines when a well and, ultimately, when a reservoir is depleted. Reservoir parameters (obtained from field and laboratory tests) used in the three model studies are: ~ = 6.53%; Sw= 25%: OIP = 5.4 MMSTB; oil zone thickness = 100 ft; aquifer thickness = 100 ft; and 1973 actual field costs. The first model tested was a homogeneous carbonate system having the following permeability values: kh = 5,000 mD and k = 10 mD. Results are presented in Fig. 5128A. Ultimate recoveries, to the economic limit, carried from 65.8% oil-in-place (OIP) for the 5,000 bbl of total fluids produced per day (BFPD) to 63.6% OIP for the 100 BFPD. As expected, water breakthrough occurred earlier for the increased rates, which resulted in quite different water/oil ratio performance for each case as shown in Fig. 5-128A. Lee et al. (1974) pointed out that it is the level of water/oil ratio at a given oil rate that establishes the economic limit. Results showed that when larger volumes of water are cycled through the Leduc homogeneous reservoir, the ultimate recoveries are higher. The 5,000 BFPD case resulted in a 65.8% recovery, in contrast to 63.6% for the 100 BFPD case (Table 5-XXVII). A second homogeneous case investigated the sensitivity of recovery to the well rate as a function of the ratio of horizontal to vertical permeability (kh = 500 mD and k~ = 10 mD). The value of this ratio affects the coning characteristics of a well. Lee et al. (1974) reported that the water breakthrough occurred 15 - 20% OIP earlier for each producing rate than in the previous 5,000-mD case. Again, the results show that with higher production rate, a greater percentage of the oil is recovered, but not as much as in the first case (Table 5-XXVII). Lower ultimate recovery is due to an increase in water coning. The third Leduc coning case considered a heterogeneous carbonate system. The model was constructed with kh values ranging from 2 to 5,000 mD and k values ranging from 0.02 to 300 mD. Figure 5-128B summarizes the predicted performance for this case. Lee et al. (1974) attributed the early water breakthrough in the heterogeneous reservoir to lower overall permeability values, which increased the coning tendencies, as compared to the homogeneous cases. Better oil recoveries at increased producing rates are evident in Table 5-XXVII.
B
A ~
T
ECONOMIC LIMIT BFPD
m ,
I
ECONOMIC LIMIT BFPD
100
-
i
"\I
-.,.~ S000
I 1000
-
S01)
I
,o
;
t
I
-14" ~'--
LEDUC CONING MODEL
1000__
-
5,000
rod, ,
K v - 10 rod) j
~~
~,
/,' II
~
~'%%%
'
'
'
I
i>xTf
%
~
/
--100
,,~
-
10
to
/!1'
500 100
/
~
I
40
50
~
Ioo:
/,',,
H O M O G E N E O U S SYSTEM RESULTS (K h ,
"\
100
A
.
i
10
20
30
i
J
00
~0
CUik~Jl~kTlVE OIL PRODUCTION - % OIP !0
20
310 40 50 80 CUIIKJLATIV| OIL PIIOOUCTION - % OIP
70
Fig. 5-128. Effect of variable production rates on oil recovery based on a two-dimensional, two-phase water coning model (Leduc reef coning model). ( A ) Performance results for a homogeneous carbonate reservoir. The water breakthrough occurred early for the increased rates, which resulted in significantly :lifferent water/oil ratio performance for each case. ( B ) - Performance results for heterogeneous carbonate reservoir. Here, water breakthrough occurred earlier Lhan for the homogeneous system due to increased coning tendencies. (After Lee et al., 1974, figs. 2 and 3" reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
,D
492 TABLE 5-XXVII Recovery efficiencies at economic limit generated by different computer models in a western Canadian carbonate reservoir simulation study Fluid rate bfpd
Oil rate bopd
WOR bbl/bbl
Recovery % OIP
Water cycled MMSTB
Homogeneous kh = 5000 mD k = 10 mD
5000
26
192
65.8
21.4
1000 500 100
10 7 5
99 71 19
65.2 64.9 63.6
10.4 6.2 1.5
Homogeneous kh = 500 mD kV= 10 mD
500
7
71
63.8
8.6
100
5
19
62.2
2.8
Heterogeneous
1000 500 100
10 7 5
99 71 19
58.2 57.7 54.4
27.4 22.8 10.5
Tight lenses
1000 500 100
10 7 5
99 71 19
64.0 63.2 62.3
11.1 5.4 1.4
Leduc Coning Model
Layered Model Thick layer system
500 100
28 22
17 3.5
55.6 57.8
0.61 0.58
Thin layer system
500 100
28 22
17 3.5
59.2 57.8
3.06 0.24
Source: After Lee et al., 1973, table 2; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Lee et al.'s (1974) fourth model was developed to study the sensitivity of recovery to production rate for tight lenses in an otherwise homogeneous carbonate matrix. Four lenses were included in the model to introduce areas of significantly reduced horizontal and vertical permeability. Results show that oil recovery increases uniformly from 62.3 to 64.0% OIP for rates of 100 and 1,000 BFPD (Table 5-XXVII). Lee et al. (1974) noted that the position of the lens in the reservoir, and the magnitude of its permeabilities, determine if increased rates have a beneficial or detrimental effect on oil recovery from the specific lens. The increase in water throughput offsets any slight reduction in recovery from some of the lenses (Lee et al., 1974). The coning model was used to investigate the effect on ultimate recovery of increased rates (100 BFPD to an economic limit and then the rate was increased to 1,000 BFPD) in a heterogeneous reservoir during late stages of depletion. Figure 5129A indicates that recovery is improved from 54.4% to 57.8% OIP as a result of the increased rate. Lee et al. (1974) noted that the rate increase, however, captured only 90% of the additional recovery, which would have been achieved by producing at
1 m -
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
INCREASED TERMINAL RATE MODEL RESULTS
,cam
BEAVERHILL LAKE YODEL RESULTS
im--
im
s
c
I w
f
< E 4
4
ECONOMIC LIMIT B P I 0
I
5
10
1-
_-
10
52
CUMULATIVE OIL
54
Id
Id
rnowcnm
60
62
1
- x OIC
493
Fig. 5- 129. Effect of variable production rates on oil recovery based on two different models. (A) - Leduc reef coning model performance results showing the effect of increased terminal rates on ultimate recovery during late stages of reservoir depletion; (B) -Cross-sectional model performance results on Beaverhill Lake Formation. (After Lee et al., 1974, figs, 5 and 7; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
494 1,000 BFPD over the entire life of the well. Additional costs to accommodate the additional water produced could make the change in production practice unattractive. A Beaverhill Lake cross-sectional reservoir model (13 x 17 grid system) was developed by Lee et al. (1974). The model used horizontal and vertical permeability and porosity data, and fluid displacement functions obtained from core analyses of a specific Beaverhill reservoir. The parameters used in the model are: (1) horizontal permeabilities ranging from 5 to 1,900 mD, (2) vertical permeabilities ranging from 0.003 to 1.0 mD, (3) the total oil volume of 4.7 MMSTB, (4) actual field costs, and (5) economic limits ranging from 22 BOPD (100 BFPD) to 51 BOPD (1,000 BFPD). Figure 5-129B illustrates the predicted performance by the cross-sectional model. Water breakthrough occurred between 40% and 45% OIP and is consistent with the field-observed recoveries to water breakthrough (Lee at el., 1974). Ultimate recovery for the 1,000 BFPD is 5.8% OIP higher than the OIP at 100 BFPD. Another set of models was devised to consider the effect of thickness of lowpermeability carbonate layers on oil recovery in reservoirs where imbibition and gravity flow of water occur into these layers. The low-permeability layers may be sufficiently thick that complete drainage by imbibition will not occur prior to reaching the economic limit (Lee et al., 1974). The thick-layer model represented a reservoir 6,000 ft (1829 m) long, 100 ft (30 m) thick and 870 ft (265 m) wide having 6% porosity, S = 8%, and OIP of 4.7 MMSTB. The economic limits used were the same as those in the Beaverhill Lake model. Each layer was 16.7 ft (5 m) thick, and the layers were interbedded in a continuous lowpermeability layer and a continuous high-permeability layer. A capillary pressure function was applied to the footage-weighted average horizontal permeability of 16.8 mD. The capillary pressure function assigned by Lee et al. (1974) to each layer was modified by the Leverett "J" function for its permeability level. Horizontal permeabilities varied from 1.4 to 60.5 mD and were determined from a permeability capacity distribution curve. Lee et al. (1974) used one-tenth the harmonic average of the horizontal permeabilities to generate vertical permeability values. The thin-layer model was composed of layers only 5.6 ft (1.7 m) thick (1/3 the thickness of the thick-layer model). Results for the thick-layer case (Table 5-XXVII) show that recoveries range from 57.8% of the OIP at 100 BFPD, to 55.6% for the 500 BFPD. This case was the only one studied by Lee et al. (1974) where recovery did not improve with increased production rates. The thin-layer model showed the opposite effect. The 500 BFPD case recovered 59.2% OIP, which is 1.4% greater than the 100 BFPD scenario. Lee et al. (1974) used another cross-sectional model (18 x 13 grid system), and an areal model (10 x 14 grid system), to establish the effect of individual well rate restrictions and differential depletion due to selective withdrawal patterns on percent recovery of oil-in-place. Sketches of the grid models, showing the location of wells A and B, are presented in Fig. 5-130. The assigned parameter values are listed for each of the two models in Fig. 5-130. Each of these models was produced in accordance with the following three rate schedules (Lee et al., 1974): (1) Both parts of the reservoir were depleted at equal rates in order to achieve a peak rate of 10% of the ultimate reserves per year. Well rates were allowed to increase to a maximum fluid-producing capacity of twice the initial oil rate after water breakthrough; (2) Initially, only the well located in the high-permeability region was produced.
495
i
I ,
2
)
,.
s
9
DIFFERENTIAL
DEPLETION
CROSS S E C T I O N A L _
GRID
MODEL
B
SYSTEM
,3
l
i
"
t~
'3
i
9 _
i ~
,
;
i
i
I
MD
:
. lo MI~ 1 ~
]
~
0.t L-S.c..-'
i "z
' ,
',____ el
'
I '
, ";
',:, ;]
~o
i
i
i
i
I
,2
I
:
!
i
s
13
i :,
1
I !
I
' Kh
i '
" . ~
i
'
.
:I
:
16 ,|Ft.
!
| 10
i
,
~ !0
~
,
', ; ! , ! L--2-----
i
i
OIL
-
10 10
, ,K. - sod .o :-K,, -1MO' _ ,i- - - - - - - -------~,' INITIAL t
I,t
]i i 9
i
,s
10
WATER I
[ Sor
2S%
IJo ~4v
2.6 Cp o.9 cp
so
1.1~
I
[
3,, ,,.~--
WATER
i ROISTO
i
INFLUX
t IILOCK THICKNEIII - 11111 FT.
A I I
2
3
9
5
II
,o
7
'F r- FT. 9
4
6
!1~
K,t - l_0t~__ ~ D
s
s.
rL
I
)Jr,
0.44 Cp
t
B~
1.IS RB/$TB
Kv
-
1000 MD
l i
I
l
9
PO*~TI
l
! WELL A
!
1
,,~r
't
i
l
l
I
I
I
9 :0 ND WELL
B
i IILOCK
TI41CKNI[$~ -
100 l i t
B Fig. 5-130. Differential depletion model results showing the effects of individual well rate restrictions and differential depletion on reservoir performance. ( A ) - Cross-sectional system having two wells A and B, where J is the Leverett function {J(Sw) = Pc/6(k/~)~, where Pc is the capillary pressure in dynes/cm 2, is the interfacial tension in dynes/cm, k the is permeability in cm 2, and ~ is the fractional porosity}. (B) Areal system having two wells A and B. (After Lee et al., 1974, figs. 8 and 9; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
Production from the low-permeability part commenced when oil productivity from the high-permeability well decreased below the production rate of 10% of ultimate recovery per year; and
496 (3) Similar to schedule 1, except that the total fluid production was restricted to the initial oil rate. The differential depletion cross-sectional model (Fig. 5-130A) had 10.8 MMSTB OIP. The economic limits were the same as used by Lee et al. in their Leduc coning model. Results from the simulation are given in Table 5-XXVIII. Target oil rate was 2,000 BOPD. Schedule 2 gave the highest recovery, whereas schedules 1 and 3 were 0.1% and 0.9% of schedule 2, respectively. The areal simulation (Fig. 5-130B) used a target oil rate of 1,600 BOPD, with 9.4 MMSTB OIP. Wells A and B in schedule 1 have maximum fluid production capacities of 1,600 BFPD. Results from the simulation are given in Table 5-XXVIII. Both differential depletion model variations demonstrated that the selective withdrawal patterns, which result in concentrating production in the higher-permeability portion of the reservoir, do not result in a loss of ultimate recovery for the bottom-water drive. Only rate restrictions will lead to a loss in ultimate recovery in these carbonate reservoirs (Lee et al., 1974). The results of the model study compared very well to performance analyses Lee et al. (1974). Four pools in Alberta, Canada (Redwater D-3, Leduc Formation; Excelsior D-2, Leduc Formation; Judy Creek A and Judy Creek B, Beaverhill Lake Formation), were chosen for analysis based on increases in their production rates within the previous 3 years. Both the Redwater and the Excelsior pools produce under a typical Leduc strong bottom-water drive. The Redwater Field is a very large bioherm (200 mi2; 520 klTl2), which rests on a drowned carbonate platform and is surrounded by the basinal shales. The Judy Creek bioherm reservoirs require pressure maintenance by waterflooding. Porosity is best developed in the reef, reef detritus along its perimeter, and in a detrital zone across the top of the reef (Jardine and Wilshart, 1987). Lee et al. (1974) observed no significant change in the recovery efficiency at increased withdrawal rates. They concluded that the ultimate recovery will be increased with increased production rates owing to the greater volume of water throughput before reaching the economic limit (Table 5-XXIX). These conclusions are similar to those reached by Miller and Roger (1973) for typical Gulf Coast reservoir conditions. TABLE 5-XXVIII Generated recovery efficiencies at economic limit using differential depletion models in a western Canadian carbonate reservoir simulation study
System
Maximum well capacity Target rate Oil rate WOR Schedule (bfpd) (bopd) (bopd/well) (bbls/bbl)
Recovery (% OIP)
Water cycled (MMSTB)
Cross-section 1 Cross-section 2 Cross-sectiop, 3
2000 2000 1000
2000 2000 2000
14 14 10
142 142 99
61.5 61.6 60.7
43.2 43.9 28.3
Areal Areal Areal
1600 1600 800
1600 1600 1600
60 60 46
26 26 16
66.0 66.0 64.3
7.7 7.4 4.6
1 2 3
Source: After Lee et al., 1974, table 3; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engi-
neers.
497 TABLE 5-XXIX Recovery efficiencies determined from performance analyses of four Canadian Devonian carbonate reservoirs located in Alberta, Canada (after Lee et al., 1974, table 4; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers) Redwater D-3 Pool
September 1964
September 1971
December 1973
Hydrocarbon volume invaded- MMSTB Net Water Influx- MMSTB Flushing Efficiency-% OIP
451.9 287.5 63.6
610.4 405.6 66.4
722.7 487.9 67.5
Excelsior D-2 Pool
December 1960
January 1968
June 1973
Hydrocarbon volume invaded- MMSTB Net Water Influx- MMSTB Flushing Efficiency- % OIP
14.2 8.5 59.4
19.6 12.3 62.7
24.7 16.1 65.2
Judy Creek BHL A Pool
December 1969
December 1973
Hydrocarbon volume invaded- MMSTB Net Water Influx- MMSTB Flushing Efficiency- % OIP
193.9 57.3 29.6
385.2 124.4 32.3
Judy Creek BHL B Pool
December 1969
December 1973
Hydrocarbon volume invaded- MMSTB Net Water Influx- MMSTB Flushing Efficiency- % OIP
43.4 17.8 41.0
94.7 39.3 41.5
Some 13 years later, Jardine and Wilshart (1987) reported the projected approximate recovery factor for the Redwater Field to be 65% and for the Judy Creek Field to be 45%. The Redwater recovery factor is just 2% lower than Lee et al.'s (1974) projection of 67.5%, whereas Judy Creek's recovery factor is much higher than the 1969 and 1973 projections (Table 5-XXIX). This increase is due to better definition of the flow heterogeneities in the reef. This heterogeneity problem was addressed by strategically placing water injection wells into discontinuous porous zones, and then establishing a pattern waterflood. The pattern waterflood, which was placed in operation in 1974, showed a dramatic improvement in reservoir pressure approximately one year later (Jardine and Wilshart, 1987). The validity of this production practice is demonstrated by the results. H i g h - r e l i e f reservoir recovery performance. One of the greatest challenges in reservoir engineering is a reliable determination of the expected performance of a highrelief, vuggy carbonate reservoir subjected to gravity control. An example of such a reservoir would be a pinnacle reef where the height of the reef is measured in hundreds of feet. Gravity drainage is where gravity acts as the main driving force, and where gas replaces the drained reservoir pore volume. It may occur in primary stages
498 of oil production (gas-expansion drive or segregation drive), as well as in supplemental stages when gas is injected into the reservoir. The displacement efficiency for gravity drainage can be as high as 87%, and it is especially effective in water-wet, water-bearing reservoirs (Hagoort, 1980). Beveridge et al. (1969) presented simulation results of a sensitivity study to determine the effects of withdrawal rate, permeability, and relative permeability on the recovery performance of high-relief carbonate reservoirs. Their study was carried out using a one-dimensional (assuming one-dimensional vertical flow), three-phase reservoir model of a typical Devonian Rainbow-Zama pinnacle reef reservoir. It was observed by Beveridge et al. (1969) that under gravity-controlled conditions, conventional relative permeability data obtained by the unsteady-state Welge displacement method in the laboratory do not cover the low oil saturation range needed for accurate recovery predictions. Relative permeability curves can be extrapolated beyond the terminal point of the unsteady-state Welge-determined curve. However, this extrapolation is exceedingly difficult because it is the character of the curve and not the mid point that controls recovery. A better method would be a steady-state determination of relative permeability at low oil saturations. Hagoort (1980) determined the relative permeability of a dolomite in the Middle Cretaceous Karababa carbonates (Mardin Group) in the Kurkan Field, southeastern Turkey, using steady-state centrifuge results. They plotted the results graphically as: log (1-N)p vs. log Apog (g)k(t)/(l.to [~b(1 - S lw Sorg)]L, where N is the cumulative oil production expressed as a fraction of the movable oil volume IV.(1 -Siw-Sor.)] during the core test, V is the pore volume, Siw is the initial water satura~tion, Srg_iS ti~e residual oil saturation " Pfor displacement by gas, L is the characteristic length of a core or reservoir, Apo g is the pressure differential between the oil and gas, g is the acceleration of gravity, k is the absolute permeability of the core, t is the time,/~o is the oil viscosity, and ~ is the porosity of the core. In most of Hagoort's (1980) core measurements, this plot resulted in a straight line allowing him to express the results as a Corey relative permeability. Table 5-XXX provides the results of oil relative-permeability measurements for two samples of dolomite from the Kurkan Field. The results show that there are low saturations after long drainage times and, apparently, low-permeablility dolomite cores may exhibit favorable oil relative permeabilities (Hagoort, 1980). As shown before, oil production from the high-relief reservoirs forms an appreciable part of the total oil production in Alberta, Canada. In many of these carbonate reservoirs, the primary recovery mechanism is gravity drainage. Gravity forces tend to segregate the fluids according to their densities, and segregation causes the oil to move vertically ahead of the displacing water or gas (Beveridge et al., 1969). Figure 5-131 shows the simulation results of the effect of withdrawal rate on the ultimate recovery. Even doubling the expected proration allocation rate of 800 BOPD had little effect (about a 3% reduction) on ultimate recovery (Beveridge et al., 1969). It was observed by Beveridge et al. (1969) that at equal times during the depletion of the reservoir, oil saturations in the top blocks of the model were the same regardless of rate. This finding suggests that the rate effect is related to depletion time and not to higher pressure gradients. At lower rates, model blocks in the secondary gas cap have more time to drain than at higher rates. Beveridge et al.' s (1969) simulations indicate that at the lower rates, top blocks of the model had 30 years longer to drain to their
499 TABLE 5-XXX Core-determined reservoir rock and saturation properties, and Corey relative permeability values for a dolomite in the Middle Cretaceous Karababa Formation, Kurkan reservoir, southeastern Turkey Core
k (mD)
~
Siw
Sw
SO (td= 100)
1
41 70
0.19 0.25
0.14 0.15
0.11 0.12
0.21 0.14
Siw 0.14 0.15
S*orange 0.13 - 0 . 4 0.07 - 0 . 4
2
Corey Relative Permeability Core 1 2
n 5.79 4.34
k~ 0.67 1.22
Sorg 0 0
Source: From Hagoort, 1980, table 1" courtesy of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Note: k is absolute permeability; ~bis fractional porosity; Siw is initial water saturation; Sewis water saturation at the end of the measurement (td -- 100); n is relative-permeability exponent in kro = k~ S~ is average reduced oil saturation; Sorg is residual oil saturation for displacement by gas; td is dimensionless time and distance expression. effective residual oil saturations. Table 5 - X X X I presents the rock and fluid properties u s e d for the simulation. H i g h e r d i s p l a c e m e n t rates d o w n w a r d tend to offset the gas segregation u p w a r d o w i n g to the h i g h e r viscous pressure gradients i m p o s e d on the system. The gas cap m o v e s d o w n the r e e f with a lower average gas saturation; therefore, at h i g h e r rates, e c o n o m i c depletion is terminated by the high G O R p r o d u c t i o n at an earlier depletion stage. This termination will result in relatively higher residual oil saturations r e m a i n i n g in the h i g h - r e l i e f carbonate reservoir. B e v e r i d g e et al. (1969) p r o p o s e d that if the rates w e r e h i g h e n o u g h (a m a g n i t u d e h i g h e r than the p r o b a b l e rates), t h e n the TABLE 5-XXXI Rock and fluid properties used in the modeling of a pinnacle reef with 586 ft (179 m) of oil pay and no initial gas cap
Rock properties Porosity Vertical permeability Connate water saturation Maximum pay Oil originally in place
11.6% 29.2 mD 8.0% 586 ft 17,200,000 STB
Fluid properties @ Pb Saturation pressure Oil formation volume factor Solution gas--oil ratio Oil viscosity Oil gradient
1644 psig 1.2791 RB/STB 434 scf/STB 0.596 cP 0.31 psi/ft
Source: After Beveridge et al., 1969, table 1; reprinted with the permission of the Petroleum Society of Canadian Institute of Mining.
500
60
! 55 144
5O
5
T
2000
=-
9
9 9
1000 800
9
.
600
.
.
.
400
200
TOTAL PRODUCTION RATE - STB/D
Fig. 5-131. Effect of withdrawal rates on oil recovery in high-relief carbonate reservoirs subject to gravity drainage. (After Beveridge et al., 1969, fig. 2; reprinted with the permission of the Petroleum Society of The Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum.)
segregation mechanism would break down and the depletion would revert to an ordinary solution-gas drive. However, none of the rates used in their simulation showed such a breakdown of the oil and gas segregation. At high rates, the upward gas migration through the oil column was slowed down, but never ceased. The magnitude of the rate effect depends upon the shapes of the relative permeability curves and absolute permeability. The effect of absolute permeability on recovery efficiency is that by increasing the vertical permeability, the percent recovery increased (by doubling the permeability (29 mD) the recovery increased by 3.5%). Beveridge et al. (1969) noted that if the effective permeability to oil in the gas-swept region is too low to appreciably allow further oil flow, then the rate effect will be small. Beveridge et al. (1969) made three simulation runs with different relative permeability to oil curves. The relative permeability to gas remained the same for all runs (Fig. 5-132). The largest predicted recovery of 62.9% was exhibited by the kro~curve; the least recovery was provided by the kro2 curve. It was noted that the effect of relative permeability on recovery is of a greater magnitude than that of absolute permeability. The relative permeability curves, particularly in the region of low oil saturation, far outweigh any other parameter in their influence on the performance of carbonate reservoirs being depleted under gravity drainage. The relative permeability values have to be accurately defined at low liquid saturations. The non-steady state Welge
501 1,0
-
I
kro/
~/
k/F~r
L z
.0, .oo1
.ooo,
.ooool
//
0
10
20
I/ 30
/
r .....
40 SL
N
--
50
60
70
80
90
100
e/o
Fig. 5-132. Gas-oil relative permeability relationships used in the simulation of recovery sensitivities of the high-reliefcarbonate reservoirs subject to gravity drainage. Recoverypredictions: krbas e = 57.7%; krl - 62.9%; and krz - 47.0%. (After Beveridge et al., 1969, fig. 1; reprinted with the permission of the Petroleum Society of The Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum.) method did not give accurate relative permeability values in the low saturation range. Hagoort (1980) showed that the centrifuge method was an accurate and efficient method for measuring oil relative permeabilities. Beveridge et al. (1969) revealed that the limiting kro in the Upper Devonian Leduc D-3A pool, Alberta, Canada, is about 10 times smaller than the value of kro at the end of laboratory flood. The residual oil saturations obtained from flood tests on Leduc core were much higher than those indicated from actual field performance. Recoveries in high-relief, vuggy carbonate reservoirs are generally underestimated. Water invasion in fractured reservoirs During water influx into a fractured reservoir, oil displacement may result from: (1) the flow of water under naturally-imposed pressure gradients (viscous forces), and (2) imbibition, which is the spontaneous movement of water into the matrix under capillary forces. In fractured carbonate reservoirs capillary forces predominate over viscous forces. As a result, the tendency of water to channel through more permeable strata is offset by the tendency of water to imbibe into the tight matrix and displace the oil into fractures. Numerous investigators have examined imbibition behavior (Aronofsky et al., 1958; Graham and Richardson, 1959; Blair, 1964; Lord, 1971; Parsons and Chancy, 1966).
502 Graham and Richardson (1959), for example, found that in a fractured zone, imbibition is described as a condition of water imbibing from the fracture system into the matrix with simultaneous countercurrent movement of the oil from the matrix into the fractures. The rate of imbibition is directly proportional to the interfacial tension and the square root of permeability, and is dependent on wettability, fluid viscosities, and characteristics of the carbonate rock.
Examples of carbonate reservoir field performance The following case histories present a short synopsis of various carbonate reservoirs and their performance. They provide various examples of the producing mechanisms discussed in the preceding sections of this chapter. Asmari reservoirs in Iran. The producing zone in these reservoirs is the Asmari Limestone of Lower Miocene to Oligocene age. Characteristically, the reservoir is a fine- to coarse-grained, hard, compact limestone with evidence of some recrystallization and dolomitization. It generally has low porosity and permeability. The reservoir rock is folded into elongated anticlines and is extensively fractured into an elaborate pattern of separate matrix blocks. Andresen et al. (1963) have analyzed the Asmari reservoirs and their performance. During the depletion of a typical Asmari reservoir, the mechanisms of gas-cap drive, undersaturated oil expansion, solution-gas drive, gravity drainage, and imbibition displacement are all in operation at various times. Figure 5-133 is a schematic diagram of a typical Asmari reservoir, showing the distribution of fluids during production. At normal drawdown pressures, the gas-oil level moves downward and the water-oil level upward under the action of dynamic and capillary forces. The high-relief Asmari reservoirs have extremely thick oil columns with free gas caps as indicated in Fig. 5133. The oil columns consist of four sections: (1) the secondary gas cap, (2) the gassing zone, (3) the oil expansion zone, and (4) the water-invaded zone (Andresen et al., 1963). The secondary gas-cap zone is bounded by the original and the current gas-oil levels in the fissure system. Owing to the low permeability of the matrix, there is no significant segregation of fluids in the matrix blocks themselves. The gassing zone has the current gas-oil level as its upper boundary, and the lower boundary is the level at which the reservoir oil is at saturation pressure. Located within the gassing zone is the equilibrium gas saturation level. Above this position in the zone, the gas evolved from solution is mobile and flows from the matrix blocks to the fractures. It then migrates vertically through the fissure system to the gas cap. The free gas below the level of equilibrium gas saturation is immobile and is not produced from the matrix blocks. The oil expansion zone extends from the saturation pressure level to the current oil-water level. The water-invaded zone lies below the oil expansion zone. Water displaces oil in the invaded zone primarily by imbibition. The phenomenon of convection also occurs in Asmari reservoirs. At initial conditions, the reservoir is in a state of equilibrium, which is disrupted by the production process. According to Sibley (1969) saturation pressure increases with depth in most Asmari reservoirs at a rate of 4 - 5 psi/100 ft. The solution gas/oil ratio correspondingly shows an increase of 0.8 SCF/STB/100 ft of depth, which provides for convection in the highly-permeable fissure system. The above description illustrates the complexity
503 OR G. GAS CAP ~ i i i ~ i i i i i i i i i ~ i i : ~ ~ L':."i:.'i.'"!":. ORIGINAL G/O LEVEL r
EXPANSION~
~
:
?
: CURRENT G/O LEVEL
GASSING ZONE (SATURATED OIL)
EQUILIBRIUM GAS SATURATION LEVEL SATURATION PRESSURE LEVEL
)RIGINAL )IL ZONE
OIL EXPANSION ZONE (UNDER-SATURATED OIL)
CURRENT W/O LEVEL WATER INVADED ZONE ,
,....,,.3,.,.,
ORIGINAL W/O LEVEL
WATER ZONE
I Fig. 5-133. Fluid distribution in Asmari Limestonereservoirs in southern Iran during production. (After Andresen et al., 1963" courtesy of the Sixth World Petroleum Congress.) of production mechanisms in highly fractured, high-relief reservoirs. The analysis of such reservoirs can be extremely difficult.
Kirkukfield, Iraq. Kirkuk oilfield is a super-giant oil field (ultimate recovery around 10 billion barrels) discovered in Iraq in 1927 (Beydoun, 1988). The field consists of a very long, sinuous anticline that forms one of the Zagros foothill asymmetrical folds. There is superficial thrusting in the incompetent Miocene Lower Fars Formation, which is a caprock. Production is from the 'main' Asmari-equivalent (EoceneOligocene-Lower Miocene) limestone of the Kirkuk Group. The Kirkuk oilfield is another classic example of a complex reservoir system. Free water movement, pronounced gas segregation, and oil convection all occur in an extensively fractured, vuggy limestone (Freeman and Natanson, 1959). The degree of fracturing and vugginess is highest at the crest of the anticlinal structure. Temperature profiles of wells indicate that convection is substantial at the crest of the structure. In Fig. 5-134, the temperature profile of a well drilled on the crest is presented; the well had been idle for a long time. From the top of the fractured section of the oil zone to
504 0
~.t~~ '"',
I"'
I
400
9'
800
9
t200
9
.\ ]
TOP
I'--" t,L
s )...
OF
MAIN
1600
"
2000
-
LIMESTONE .
i =
I.iJ Q
2400
2800
3200 70
, 80
90
iO0
TEMPERATURE,
II0
120
,,, 130
*F
Fig. 5-134. Temperature profile of a well in the Kirkuk Field, Iraq. (After Freeman and Natanson, 1959, fig. 6; courtesy of the Fifth World Petroleum Congress.)
the water table, a distance of over 400 ft (122 m), there is virtually no change in temperature. At Kirkuk, imbibition is a major driving mechanism. Freeman and Natanson (1959) described two types of imbibition taking place in the Kirkuk reservoir. When the matrix block is totally immersed in water, countercurrent and direct flow types of imbibition should ideally yield the same ultimate recovery, even though there may be some trapping of the oil droplets in the water-filled fracture under countercurrent flow conditions. In any given time interval, however, the direct flow conditions will yield more oil if this imbibition process acts over a larger area. The reverse may also be true. Aronofsky et al. (1958) used a simple abstract model to examine the effect of water influx rate on the imbibition process. Their treatment is confined to the countercurrent imbibition.
Beaver River field, British Columbia, Canada - a high-relieffractured gas reservoir The Beaver River gas field is located in the Liard fold belt of northeastern British Columbia and the southern Yukon Territory, Canada. Gas production is from a
505 TABLE 5-XXXII Beaver River gas field, British Columbia, Canada, Middle Devonian carbonate reservoir data Reservoir
Area at G/W contact Reservoir volume (gross) Initial temperature Initial pressure Gas gravity Gas composition
Reservoir parameters Porosity cut-off Porosity average Sw: Matrix (from logs) Fracture-vugs Average h Volume (net) Recovery factor (with volumetric depletion) Gas deviation factor Recoverable reserves (raw)
10,700 acres 10.5 MM acre-ft 353~ 5,856 psig 0.653 6.9% CO 2 0.5% H2S 92.5% CH 4
2% 2.7% 25% 0% 20% 888 ft 7,210,664 acre-ft 90% 1.10 1470 BCF
Source: After Davidson and Snowdon, 1977, table 2; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.
high-relief, massive, extensively fractured and altered dolomitic reservoir with water influx (Davidson and Snowdon, 1977). Original estimates of the recoverable gas reserves, based on log and core data from the producing horizon known as the "Middle Devonian carbonate", was in excess of 1 TCF. Initial production rates of over 200 MMCF/D from six deep wells (>11,500 ft; >3,500 m) were reduced to 5 MMCF/D after four years owing to influx of water into the wells. This condition resulted in a revised estimated ultimate recovery of only 176 BCF gas. The Middle Devonian section, a relatively monotonous carbonate and evaporite sequence, was deposited in a shallow subtidal to supratidal environment on a broad carbonate bank (Davidson and Snowdon, 1977). Reservoir heterogeneities were created by a high degree of diagenesis and tectonic alteration. Tectonism created secondary fracture porosity and permeability in the dolomites. According to Davidson and Snowdon (1977) the reservoir rock can be described as a two-porosity system; matrix porosity is about 2% or less, whereas fracture-vug porosity can range from 0% to 6% or greater. Table 5-XXXII presents reservoir data for this reservoir. The high formation temperature of 353 ~ F (177 ~ C) often exceeded the endurance limits of available well-logging tools. Water saturations could not be reliably calculated from resistivity logs owing to extremely low conductivities of the dolomites. Figure 5-135 presents the capillary pressure tests on the cores from the field. Results indicate that connate water saturations in the matrix porosity are in the range of 5 0 - 80%. Davidson and Snowdon (1977) pointed out that it was reasonable to expect the fracture-vug system to be essentially free of connate water. Initial reserve calculations, however, assumed
506 MATRIX & VUGGY POROSITY
MATRIX POROSITY ( W/OCCASIONAL VUG. )
18oo (594)
1600
(S281
.075 1400 1~21
O
,ft r
o .u
13961 I,&J
E
Q~ = : ) uIX a
.10
u~ I.iJ Q~
O..
U,J
Z
I~X
I.--
eLI
)--
13301
o~ u.i Q.
O~ U
u.J 0 Z
~
U.I Q~
800
o Q.
12641
I,.
.15
~. j.".r-
u_
o
tJ') m
~
600
~
11981
.20
.25
400 (1321
200 (66)
o-
2.0 4.0
4.3 = POROSITY o
~o
2o
WETTING
30
4o
so
6o
70
PHASE SATURATION
to
9o
I00
(percent)
Fig. 5-135. Mercury injection capillary pressure curves for the Middle Devonian carbonate in the Beaver River Field, northern British Columbia, Canada. Porosity values shown on the curves are in percent. The curves show that the irreducible water saturations in the matrix range from 50 to 80 %. (After Davidson and Snowdon, 1977, fig. 6; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.) an average water saturation of 20% before core testing. Log estimates of 25% for the matrix and 0% in the fracture-vug system resulted in the overall Swave = 20%. The weighted average matrix permeabilities as determined from cores are extremely questionable owing to the formation of horizontal relaxation fractures created by coring the tectonically-stressed dolomites. Matrix permeabilities in the low-porosity zones
507 ranged from 2 to 20 mD for kh and from 0.1 to 5 mD for k.v In the high-porosity zones, matrix permeabilities ranged from 20 to 200 mD for kh and from 2 to 25 mD for k. Davidson and Snowdon (1977) remarked that within six months, decrease in production rate and flowing pressure were observed in two wells. Well testing showed that there was a high water/gas ratio of around 2000 bbl/MMSCF. Water coning was suspected because: (1) the completed zones were close to the water contact, (2) vertical permeability was high through the fracture system, (3) production rates were high, with (4) resulting high bottomhole pressure drawdowns. Water production commenced generally across the entire Beaver River Field with WOR's increasing from the water of condensation level of 5 bbl/MMSCF to 25 bbl/MMSCE After imposing rate limits, decrease in the gas production rate continued as water production increased. Evidence that formation water was entering the wells was based on the increase in the chloride content of produced water before the WOR increased in the wells. This was due to mingling of the invading water with the water of condensation (Davidson and Snowdon, 1977). After an increase in the WORs, the wells died from excessive water production within a year. The production history of the Beaver River Field is documented in Fig. 5-136. 240
240
o
200
200
.d an
160 ~
160
~ v
0
,/
uJ I--
<[ ~-
mz
/
I-
/
120
t~
120 t~ O Oa. ttl
w9~ o 80
80
40
40
~"
oL 1971
I 1972
I 1973
! 1974
I 1975
| 1976
~
0 1977
Fig. 5-136. Cumulative production history of the Beaver River Field, northern British Columbia, Canada. (After Davidson and Snowdon, 1977, fig. 7; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
508 Subsequent well recompletions and computer modeling demonstrated that water coning was an insignificant factor, and that water influx across the entire reservoir through the fracture system was responsible for the water production (Davidson and Snowdon, 1977). The recovery problem was attributed to the extensive vertical and horizontal fractures, which prevented the establishment of the pressure distribution necessary for coning and resulted in a uniform influx of water through the fracture system. Davidson and Snowdon (1977) pointed out that with the type of fracture system present, water production would not be sensitive to the withdrawal rate until the water contact approached a well's perforations. A tactic used to take advantage of this situation was to create the largest possible pressure drop between the matrix and the fracture system by producing the wells at their maximum rates. This approach was to optimize the depletion of the matrix and dead-end fractures-vugs before they are isolated by the influx of water. (The writers find it interesting that in the case of waterflooding in oil reservoirs, vugs are "bad news" in water-wet rocks owing to oil trapping and "good news" in oil-wet rocks.) Davidson and Snowdon (1977) proposed the explanation that the water influx problem was a direct result of the general relation of the Beaver River Field to the regional Beaver River Aquifer (Fig. 5-137). Hydrodynamic analysis showed that the reservoir's pressure-depth relation is related to the aquifer's outcrop elevation. For the Beaver River Field the potentiometric-surface values are about 1,500 ft (457 m) above sea-level. This corresponds to the surface elevation of the Middle Devonian carbonate outcrops some 85 mi (137 km) to the north in the Yukon Territory. The aquifer increases in elevation by 13,000 ft (3,962 m) or 153 ft/mi (29 m/km) between the Beaver River Field and the South Nahanni River (Fig. 5-137). Such a high dip in the aquifer is conducive to a rapid influx of water into the reservoir as depletion occurs. The writers, however, question whether or not the major fault, shown in Fig. 5-137 just south of the South Nahanni River, could be a barrier to the movement of water downdip. Water influx into the reservoir could have just as well occurred from the Besa River Formation along the faults and extension fractures, which extend upward along the crest of the Beaver River anticline. Davidson and Snowdon (1977) did not discuss this alternative as a possible source of water. San Andres Field, Veracruz, M e x i c o - an extremely undersaturated oil reservoir. The Jurassic SanAndres Limestone reservoir of the SanAndres Field (State of Veracruz, Mexico) is an example of a highly undersaturated oil reservoir (Garaicochea Petrirena et al. 1963). The original reservoir pressure was 6,620 psi (45.6 MPa) and a bubble point pressure was 2,525 psi (17.4 MPa). The San Andres zone is chalky, oolitic limestone exhibiting intergranular porosity with occasional vugs and fissures. The average permeability is 2.5 mD. Reservoir performance, as illustrated in Fig. 5-138, has demonstrated a high degree of undersaturation with a rapid decrease in production rate and an essentially constant gas/oil ratio of 615 ft3/B (110 m3/m3) and a water cut of 1 - 2 % . An increase in the GOR in the middle of 1960 reflected a pilot gas injection test. The test was initiated in December, 1959, and terminated in the latter part of 1960 owing to an unfavorable response in the surrounding wells to the gas injection. By March, 1960, the reservoir pressure had declined sharply to 4,060 psi (28 MPa) with a cumulative recovery of 5% of the initial oil-in-place. Garaicochea
$
N Mil)OI.E DEVONIAN C A l U l O N A T [ OUTCROP .
AGE
L. CRET.
.
.
.
SOUTH NAHANNI RNER ~
r" A
|
ROCK UNIT FT. :. ST. JOHN GROUP ~
~__
7z
_o,,,T_.U~~A. t.~'VE__L
,
...................
o
~iiii::'"
,ooo
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil;i!iiiiiiiiii, -Iil i/ I~TTSON .'.:. Fm. ".'~"
-'.-.2
MISS.
BI~SA
.-----"
kT[
RNER
u.
0Ev.
VICIAN
ooo
PROPHE~ -_..-
MIDDLE DEV~omAN "MIDDLE DEV. SILURIANCARS" ORDO
!
-_.~
,L 16,000
l~ .....
,o,
.......
,,,o
Fig. 5-137. Cross-section of the Beaver River aquifer. (After Davidson and Snowdon, 1977, fig. 8; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
510
% _
7
6
TION a.
RATE
4
3 2
Z I-
O
Z 0
WATER PRODUCTION
I,.-
I"1_
300
E
I
2O0
nO w p-
E p.
0 Ir
250
GAS -OIL
<
150
--J
ioo
RATIO
~:
O i
<
50
1956
1957
I958
I959
i960
1961
1962
Fig. 5-138. Performanceof the Jurassic San Andres Limestone reservoir,VeracruzState, Mexico. (After Garaicochea Petrirenaet al., 1963"courtesy of the Sixth WorldPetroleumCongress.) Petrirena et al. (1963) calculated a recovery of 7.4% to bubble point pressure under an oil expansion producing mechanism. By the middle of 1962, 8.4% of the oil-in-place had been produced, which should have lowered the reservoir pressure to slightly below bubble point pressure. Statistical studies on oil recovery efficiency The American Petroleum Institute (1967) presented a statistical study of oil recovery efficiency based on the case histories from 226 sandstone and 86 carbonate reservoirs in the U.S.A. The reservoirs were classified on the basis of their predominant drive mechanism: solution-gas drive without supplemental drive, solution-gas drive with supplemental drive, gas-cap drive, water drive, and gravity drainage. It is by far the most comprehensive and exhaustive study of oil pool performance ever published, and affords the opportunity for meaningful comparisons between sandstone and carbonate reservoirs under the various drive mechanisms mentioned. The results of the study are summarized below: Tables 5 - X X X I I I - 5-XXXVII show the range of values for the reservoir parameters under the five different producing mechanisms. The parameters for the solutiongas- and water-drive pools have been grouped on the basis of the type of reservoir rock: sandstone or limestone, dolomite, and other (chert, etc.). The gas-cap-drive and gravity-drainage reservoir data were more limited. The sandstone and carbonate reservoirs have been combined in the gas-cap-drive analysis. The gravity-drainage data
511 TABLE 5-XXXIII Range of values for reservoir parameters with solution-gas drive as a predominant drive mechanism without supplemental drives Parameters*
Sand and sandstone Minimum
Rock k, darcys 0.006 ~, fraction 0.115 S w, fraction 0.150 Fluids go, ~ 20 Pob' cP 0.3 Rsb, cf/bbl 60 Bood, ratio 1.050 Boor ratio 1.050 Boaa, ratio 1.000 Environment h , ft 3.4 a, deg 0-5 Db,, ft 1500 T, ~ 79 Pb' psig 639 pa, psig 10 Ultimate recovery BAF, bbl/AF 47 RE, % 9.5 S r, fraction 0.130
Limestone, dolomite, and other
Median
Maximum
Minimum
Median
Maximum
0.051 0.188 0.300
0.940 0.299 0.500
0.001 0.042 0.163
0.016 0.135 0.250
0.252 0.200 0.350
35 0.8 565 1.310 1.297 1.090
49 6 1680 1.900 1.740 1.400
32 0.2 302 1.200 1.200 1.060
40 0.4 640 1.346 1.402 1.120
50.2 1.5 1867 2.067 2.350 1.420
32.2 5-15 5380 150 1,750 150
772 >45 11,500 260 4,403 1,000
3.9 0-5 3,100 107 1,280 50
27 0-5 6300 174 2,383 200
425 5-15 10,500 209 3,578 1,300
154 21.3 0.229
534 46.0 0.382
20 15.5 0.169
88 17.6 0.267
187 20.7 0.447
Source: After Arps et al., 1967; courtesy of the American Institute of Petroleum. * Nomenclature for Tables X X X I I I - XXXVII: go = stock-tank oil gravity (~ /~o = reservoir oil viscosity (cP); R s = solution gas/oil ratio (SCF/bbl); B o = oil formation volume factor (reservoir bbl/ STB); h = net pay thickness (ft); a = formation dip (degrees); Dos =depth below the surface (ft); RE = recovery efficiency (% of initial stock tank oil-in-place)" S = residual gas saturation (fraction of pore space)" S = residual oil saturation (fraction of pore space). Subscripts: i = mmal conditions; b = bubble point conditions; a = abandonment conditions; d = differential liberation;f= flash liberation; k= arithmetic average of absolute permeability, D. '
gr
.
.
.
.
.
.
parameters are presented for sandstones only. Seventy-seven sandstone and 21 carbonate pools producing under essentially solution-gas-drive mechanisms were studied. Eighty-one pools (60 sandstone and 21 carbonate) had solution-gas drive as the predominant recovery mechanism, supplemented by water drive, gravity drainage, and, in a few cases, partial gas or water injection. Seventy-two sandstone and 39 carbonate water drive pools were examined. Only 14 gas-cap-drive and 6 gravity-drainage pools were included. The value of these data is primarily for comparison purposes. As expected, the solution-gas-drive pools have the lowest recovery efficiencies and the pools under water drive and gravity drainage show the highest recoveries. The sandstone reservoirs exhibit higher oil recoveries than the carbonate pools, and also have higher porosities and much greater permeabilities. The carbonates, however, are much more likely to be fractured and fissured, a factor which is not always reflected accu-
512 TABLE 5-XXXIV Range of values for reservoir parameters with solution-gas drive as a predominant drive mechanism with supplemental drives Parameters*
Sand and sandstone Minimum
Rock k, darcys 0.010 ~, fraction 0.120 Sw, fraction 0.100 Fluids go, ~ 15.5 l~ob, cP 0.4 Rsb, cf/bbl 10 Bobd, ratio 1 010 Bobr ratio 1.015 Boad, ratio 1.000 Environment h , ft 4 a, deg 0--5 Dbs, ft 300 T, ~ 77 Pb' psig 5 pa, psig 5 Ultimate recovery BAF, bbl/AF 109 RE, % 13.1 St, fraction 0.077
Limestone, dolomite, and other
Median
Maximum
Minimum
Median
Maximum
0.216 0.210 0.310
2.500 0.359 0.579
0.002 0.033 0.035
0.019 0.133 0.250
0.867 0.248 0.600
36 0.9 390 1.230 1.230 1.050
46 20 1010 1.580 1.845 1.220
22 0.3 60 1.050 1.050 1.020
38 0.8 615 1.328 1.310 1.110
46 2 1325 1.682 1.680 1.500
30 0-5 4237 146 1,360 100
714 >45 10,280 260 4,275 800
8 0-5 2800 88 530 40
31 0-5 6000 128 1,830 200 1,550
154 5--15 10,530 225 2,935
227 28.4 0.255
820 57.9 0.435
32 9.0 0.112
120 21.8 0.260
464 48.1 0.426
Source: After Arps et al., 1967; courtesy of the American Institute of Petroleum. Nomenclature as for Table XXXIII. *Data for gas-drive pools do not include any oil produced above bubble point.
rately in the stated values for porosity and permeability. In this connection, it should be borne in mind that fractures may form during the core recovery process. The wider range of recovery efficiencies in carbonates corresponds to the inherently greater authigenic and diagenetic complexity of carbonate rocks. In Table 5-XXXIII the median value for percentage recovery of initial oil-in-place for solution-gas drive without supplementary drive is 21.3% for sandstone pools, compared to 17.6% for carbonate reservoirs. The median values of 154 and 88 bbl/acre-ft for sandstones and carbonates, respectively, show, however, that actual recoveries in sandstones are almost twice as high as the carbonate values, partly owing to the much higher porosities in sandstones. Supplemental drives also appear to have benefitted sandstone reservoirs examined in this study (Table 5-XXXIV). The median values show that the effect of supplementation by additional drive mechanisms is about 1/3 for sandstones and 1/4 for carbonates. When gas-cap drive is the predominant mechanism, the average recovery efficiency is higher by about 2/3 than the comparable value for the solution-gas-drive mechanism (Table 5-XXXV). The median values for ultimate recovery (bbl/acre-ft) by water drive in sandstones exceed those for limestones and dolomites by a factor of 3 and, in terms of recovery
513 TABLE 5-XXXV Range of values for reservoir parameters with gas-cap drive as a predominant drive mechanism Parameters
All rock types combined
Rock k, darcys q~, fraction S w, fraction Fluids go, ~ Pob, cP Rsb, cf/bbl Boba, ratio Bobp ratio Boaa, ratio Environment h,ft a, deg Dbs, ft T, ~ Pb' psig pa, psig Ultimate recovery BAF, bbl/AF
RE, % S r, fraction
Minimum
Median
Maximum
0.047 0.086 0.150
0.600 0.225 0.262
1.966 0.358 0.430
34 0.3 226 1.116 1.116 1.040
40 0.6 703 1.374 1.350 1.159
43 2.3 1335 1.675 1.631 1.490
7 0-5 3300 108 854 0
15 0-5 5500 175 2213 500
35 15-45 7675 200 3583 2900
68 15.8 0.223
289 32.5 0.271
864 67.0 0.517
Source: After Arps et al., 1967; courtesy of the American Institute of Petroleum. Nomenclature as for Table XXXIII.
efficiency, by 17% (Table 5-XXXVI). Water drive seems to be about 2.5 times more efficient than unsupplemented solution-gas drive in both sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. Data for the water-drive cases in sandstones, and the solution-gas-drive cases in both sandstones and carbonate rocks, were subjected to regression analysis. For the water drive reservoirs the following regression equation for the recovery efficiency (RE, in % of initial oil-in-place) was found: 0.0422 RE
=
5 4 . 8 9 8
-.--
.
0.0770 .
- 0.1903 .
-0.2159 ,
where/~w~ = initial water viscosity (cP), jLgoi "- initial oil viscosity (cP), k = arithmetic average of absolute permeability (D), S = interstitial water content (fraction of the total pore space), ~b = porosity (fraction), Boi = initial oil formation volume factor (reservoir bbl/bbl tank oil), Pi = initial reservoir pressure (psig), and Pa = reservoir pressure at abandonment (psig).
514 TABLE 5-XXXVI Range of values for reservoir parameters with water drive as a predominant drive mechanism Parameters
Sand and sandstone Minimum
Rock k, darcys 0.011 ~b, fraction 0.111 S w,fraction 0.052 Fluids go, ~ 15.5 Poi, cP 0.2 Pw, cf/bbl 0.24 BoiI, ratio 0.997 Bobz, ratio 1.008 Bo,I, ratio 1.004 Pw- Po, g/cc 0.054 Environment h , ft 6.5 a, deg 0-5 Db,, ft 1400 T, ~ 84 Pi' psig 450 Pb' psig 52 Pa' psig 100 Ultimate recovery BAF, bbl/AF 155 RE, % 27.8 S r, fraction 0.114
Limestone, dolomite, and other
Median
Maximum
Minimum
Median
Maximum
0.568 0.256 0.250
4.000 0.350 0.470
0.010 0.022 0.033
0.127 0.154 0.180
1.600 0.300 0.500
35.3 1.0 0.46 1.238 1.259 1.223 0.241
50 500 0.95 2.950 2.950 1.970 0.490
15 0.2 . . . . . . . 1.110 . . . . . .
37 0.7 . . . . . . 1.321 . . . . . . . . . .
54 142
17.5 0-5 6260 163 2775 1815 1970
160 15-45 12,400 270 6788 5400 5010
9 50.2 . . . . . . . . . 2210 6790 90 182 700 3200 30 1805 . . . . . . . . .
185
571 51.1 0.327
1641 86.7 0.635
6 6.3 0.247
. . . .
172 43.6 0.421
11933
13,100 226 5668 3821 1422 80.5 0.908
Source: After Arps et al., 1967; courtesy of the American Institute of Petroleum. Nomenclature as for Table XXXIII.
The API subcommittee established the following regression equation for recovery efficiency below the bubble point in solution-gas-drive reservoirs: 0.1611
RE = 41.815
[~I-S)1 Bob
"
0.0979 I Pkoi b 1
"
0.3722 I Sw 1
"
0.1744 P[-~a 1 ,
(5-142)
where Bob = oil formation volume factor at bubble point pressure (reservoir bbl/bbl tank oil), Pob = oil viscosity at bubble point pressure (cP), and Pb = bubble point pressure (psig). An examination of Eqs. 5-141 and 5-142 shows the presence of four common variables: (1) oil-in-place under initial conditions for the water-drive reservoirs and at bubble point pressure for the solution-gas-drive reservoirs; (2) mobility factor: at initial conditions for the water-drive pools and at bubble point pressure for the solutiongas-drive pools; (3) interstitial water saturation; and (4) pressure drop ratio" initial/
515 TABLE 5-XXXVII Range of values for reservoir parameters with gravity drive as a predominant drive mechanism Parameters
Rock k, darcys ~, fraction Sw,fraction Fluids go, ~ l~ob, cP Rsb , cf/bbl Bobd, ratio Bobp ratio Boad, ratio Environment h, ft a, deg Dbs, ft T, ~ Pb' psig Pu' psig Ultimate recoxery BAF, bbl/AF RE, % S,., fraction
Sand and sandstone only Minimum
Median
Maximum
0.305 0.194 0.030
1.285 0.329 0.293
2.000 0.350 0.400
15 0.7 96 1.070 1.070 1.030
22.5 4 200 1.106 1.106 1.040
38.5 8 735 1.383 1.340 1.100
40 0-5 1,170 100 497 0
71 5-15 2,400 100 1,044 20
900 15-45 6,500 132 2,670 50
250 16 0.151
696 57.2 0.377
1,124 63.8 0.654
Source: After Arps et al., 1967; courtesy of the American Institute of Petroleum.
Nomenclature as for Table XXXIII.
abandonment pressure ratio for water-drive reservoirs and bubble point/abandonment pressure ratio for solution-gas-drive reservoirs. It is interesting to note that recovery efficiencies may either increase or decrease for both mechanisms when the oil-inplace and the mobility factor variables, respectively, are either high or low. On the other hand, low values for water saturation ( S ) and pressure drop rates result in higher recovery efficiencies in water-drive reservoirs, and lower recovery efficiencies in solution-gas-drive reservoirs. Even though high S values serve to increase recovery efficiency in solution-gas-drive reservoirs, the actual recoveries in barrels per acre-foot are usually less. Equations 5-141 and 5-142 can be of value to the geologist and the petroleum engineer in the estimation of ultimate recovery from carbonate reservoirs in instances where the data required for more detailed studies are lacking. In all cases, these equations are helpful for comparison purposes. To facilitate the use of Eqs. 5-141 and 5-142,Arps (1968) developed the nomographs shown in Figs. 5-139 and 5-140. In Table 5-XXXVIII, the writers have assembled limited data on reservoir characteristics and performance for selected carbonate reservoirs throughout the world.
516
Based On:
BAF = 3244 X
fiob
X
X
.Oil in
~oo~(~ - s , )
D r~r.r.r.r.r..~p_ Ratio
Bob in Per Cent
" - - - 2 . 20
Estimated Recovery. Facto__.__r in Bbls/AF
~
~
Interstitial Wate.~_z.r Saturation S in Per C e n t . - "~
-
'-
.S ,-
't
:XH -
,
I
:X)I--
Mobility.. Facto____~r
i"
SO
S ~ IS
Sw
EXAMPLE:
4~)|
i
.3
!
30
'
-
' .21 I
001-
i~-(~.
,.
- ~ "~" IWt':
-, - - " "
.I
~
9
30 "~ ....
7
~" )$~
(~,,
C); I format ion volume factor Bob - 1.40
~ = .020 da,c;es
Q 10~
00"-. """"
9
Water Ioturation S - .34
~O
III
-
Porosl l'y g = . 174
" ""'"
,...,04
Formot;on oil v;scosity ~c~= cp. Bubble point pretsure
- 6
gO -
I~-
" "
4
|1
2~
"
Pb :
"
Al~r~donment pressure Pa : 580 ps;
D3
S
3 6 6 0 psi
:)2
Z
- 4
.
:30 '--
3 !-
,o, -
2C
"
1.40
_ 8.2% -
/~ob;/;ty factor: (.020) .'- (.50) = .04
~. 3
0 ; I ;n place: (~oo)(. ~ r _ , ) ( ~ - . ~ )
2C aS ."
Pressure drop ratio: 3660 - 580 -- 6"--"~1.
.~3~ 2 A
I: B
C
s
F
,oo21-O
I . CONWCt 8.:7% on oil in place scale A with mobility factor .04 on scale G and find intercept b on scale B. 2. C ~ n e c t point b on scale I~ with ~ater toturatlon 34% on scale F and find intercept c on scale C. 3. Connect point c on scale C with p r e t ~ m drop ratio 6.31 on scale E and find estimated recovery factor a3 119 I~'rllls I ~ r acre foot at intercept with scale 0 9
Fig. 5-139. Nomograph for estimating recovery factor (bbl/acre-ft) by solution-gas drive (below bubble point) in sandstones and carbonates. (After Arps, 1968; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
517
r~ (,- Sw)~ ".o,2 ( ~" 1" o77 i 'o, ~ x ~o,/ •
~'~~176 Q;I "n Place 100~(1 - s ) w
Pressure Drop_
Est i mated Recovery Factor in Bbls/'AF
B .
OI in Pe Cent __ _._j
Ratio
(s). -.190
- .216
Interstitial Water Saturation
M i _o. .b. i l ty. Factor
Sw
k IJwi i
i-~a
- 25
in Per Cent
'F
'~
31-
t
EXAMPLE:
2
Porosity It : .282
I
-20 IIi
Water Soturat;o~ S =.35
i
i
w
O i l formation volume factor B . :1.10 o!
t .S t$
Permeobl llty k : .250 d o t t l e s
.3 ~
Formation woter viscosity
.2
iJwi : ..$4 cp 14)0
x
FormGtion o;I v i ~ i t y
~.r
iJoi
= 1.31 cp
I n i t i a l pressure Pi : 1986 psi 9
,
Abandonment premium
4
Po :
800 psi
8
20<
7
,b
30
6 t-
-b
Q i l in Place: (loo)( .282)(I - .~) i .lO
.02
(.250)(.$4) 1.31
I0
A ! .
2. 3.
g
C
:
.103
P r e ~ u r e d,r,o~_rati___.__o: 19~-~ : 2.48
$
-4
16.7%
Mob; I;t~ factor:
.at
7 -
:
SOL l
f
.oo'zL G
C o n n e c t 1 6 . 7 % on o;I ;n place scale A with m o b i l i t y factor .103 on scale G oral find i n t e r c e p t b on scale !1. Connect point b on scale B with ~ofer saturation 35% on scale F and find intercept c o~ scale C . Cocmect p o i n t c on scale C with pressure drop ratio 2 . 4 8 on scale E and find estimated recovery factor $54 barrels per acre foot at intercept with scAIle O.
Fig. 5-140. Nomograph for estimating recovery factor (bbl/acre-ft) by water drive in sandstones. (After Arps, 1968; reprinted with the permission of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.)
Table 5-XXXVIII OO
Summary of reservoir characteristics and primary performance data, and references for selected carbonate reservoirs categorized on pore type and drive mechanism The following symbols are used in the table: 1. Exploration discovery methods: G Surface geology GS Surface geology and seismic survey R Redrill S Seismic survey SG Subsurface geology SGS Subsurface geology and seismic survey W Wildcat WS Wildcat and seismic survey 2. Geologic age: T Tertiary (e = Eocene, p = Paleocene) K Cretaceous J Jurassic P Permian IP Pennsylvanian M Mississippian D Devonian S Silurian O Ordovician C Cambrian
Field name
State, County country
A:
Solution Gas Drive
AA:
Intercrystalline-intergranular porosity - solution-gas drive
Exploration Productive Geologic Trap Reservoir discovery formation age mechanism rock type method
3. Trap mechanism: 1 Anticline 2 Fault 3 Unconformity 4 Reef 5 Pinch out 6 Monocline 7 Local porosity 8 Syncline 4. Reservoir rock type: D Dolomite (dolostone) L Limestone D-L Dolomite and limestone; dolomite predominates L-D Limestone and dolomite; limestone predominates 5. Porosity is normally given as an average value; some values are absolute maximums. 6. Most of the permeabilities reported represent an average value; some values are shown as ranges, and others are reported in relative descriptive terms 7. Footnotes: a Matrix has no porosity, b Oil viscosity in centipoises. c Cumulative oil production to date of publication, d Condensate reservoir. e Ultimate recovery in barrels per acre-foot, f STOP (stock tank oil-in-place, initial). Ultimate recovery is primary unless otherwise noted.
Productive Oil and acreage gas column (acres) (ft)
Pay thickness
Crude gravity
~
k
S;
(ft)
(~
(%)
(mD) (%)
P;
Ph
T
Solution Ultimate reGOR covery
(psi)
(psi) (~
(cu ft/bbl) (MMbbl)(%)
Ref. No.
1 Adell
Kansas Sheridan
W
2 Anton-
Texas
SGS
Irish
Lamb,
3 Block 31 4 Eubank
Hale, Lubbock Texas Crane Kansas Haskell
W
Eubank Eubank
Kansas Haskell Kansas Haskell
W W
LansingIP Kansas City Clear Fork P
1
L
1200
5
D
9000
L L
400 1280
25 20
5 14
35.8 34.4
235
42
47
Texas
Ector
Grayburg
P
5
D
15500
7 Fullerton
Texas
Andrews
Clear Fork P
5
L
16642
Ohara
M
5
L
725
Turner
M
5
D
23962
Valley Petit
K
1-5
L
11269
13 McElroy
LansingP Kansas City Fusselman S--D
1
L
60
5--6
D
3600
Crane,
Grayburg
P
1-5
D
30000
14 New Hope Texas 15 Panhandle Texas
Upton Franklin Carson, Gray
Bacon Brown
K P
1 3
L D
4609 200000
16 Parks 17 Pickton 18 Plainville 19 Rocker A 20 Slaughter
Midland Hopkins Daviess Garza Cochran
Bend Bacon McClosky Glorieta San Andres
P K M P P
1 1-5 1 1 5
L L D-L D D-L
Grayburg Dahra-B San Andres Petit
P T (p) P K
5 1 1 5
D D D L
21 22 23 24
Texas
Texas Texas Indiana Texas Texas
So. CowdenTexas Ector U m m F a r u d Libya Waddell Texas Crane West Louiana Claiborne
S SG
1
1-5 1-5
16000
S
15
M IP
L
Howard
46 37
185 11
5
12 Luther S.E. Texas
16.2
350 27
IP
SGS
9.4
6000 240
Odom
11 Hortonville Kansas Sheridan
30
L L
Coke
9Harmattan- Alberta,
400
1 1-5
Texas
Elkton Canada 10Haynesville Louisiana, Arkansas
30 - 41.5
D M
borne 6 Foster
W
140
Devonian Ste. Genevieve Cherokee LansingKansas City
5 Ft.Chad-
8 Gard's Pt.* Illinois Wabash
50--60
6400 7900 400 1120 87500
200 330
82
10
100125 550
215 220 60 60
3354 8000 4341
80 280
37
4145
44
600 1330
35-45
2230
2230 134
975
1
35
1140
371
24
38
7.7- 6.711.4 12.6 8--12 100
1581760 2980
36.4
216 6-12
2040
4-5 8
35
36
11.3
11.3
38-40
19-20 23
113
2-4
29-40
8-65
43.5
15
23
2764 139
1300
5c
1
39 c
2
69
25 t
1 1
96
2370
1590
26
246
28 z
4
13.6
5
26.5
6
8001200 3636
0.9 ~
7
3636 203
871
45--60
30--40 ~ 8
2440
2331 179
460
14.9 28.54
18 344
9 1
16 20
4246
13 ~
42.5
8.1 1200 f
19
11 1214 15 16 7 2 1719
32
13
30
1300
755
86
315
11 60
43 40-46
18.9 12
379 25
25.4 30--45
3425 440
907 203 440 85
256 275
21 8 20 40 40
45.5 50 38.5 34 29--32
6.8 20
2.6 250
33 25
4567 3578 375
3508 174 3578 209
1817 1915
3.9 6.66 4.07
17 19.4
13.2 12.2
4.6 10
11
1710
1710 108
465
275 ~
20
40
34.8 0.7 b 34 35
7.5 24 28.1 43 11.8 12.3 9--21 1-49
31 22 35.5
1760 1003 1650 2550
325 96 253 136 1134 88
150 8
3 1
160 90-100 484 395
2 10
10.4 75 f 33 ~ 1.4
21 14
20 21 22 23
Lisbon * Composed of four small oil pools. ~Total recovery with miscible displacement is 50§ 2 Total recovery with water flood is 54%. 3 Total with gas-cap cycling and water injection; in addition 75% of condensate will be recovered. 4 Including secondary recovery (water flooding); this field has some vugular porosity and gas-cap drive. 5 Plus 17.5 MMbbl secondary. 6 Total recovery with gas injection is 61.7%. 7 Includes No. 36;
t.~
induced water drive,
q~
t,O Field name
State, County country
Exploration Productive Geologic Trap Reservoir discovery formation age mechanism rock type method
AB: Vugular-solution porosity - solution-gas drive 25 Aneth Utah San Juan Paradox 26 Bar-Mar 27 Bateman Ranch Bateman Ranch 28 Big Eddy
Texas Texas
Crane King
SG G
Texas
King
G
New Eddy Mexico Texas Henderson Texas Gaines Alberta, Canada
29 Fairway* 30 GMK 31 Golden Spike South, D-3A 32 KellyTexas Snyder 33 Morrow Ohio County 34 North New Anderson Mexico Ranch 35 Nunn Kansas 36 Plainville 37 Pleasant Prairie 38 Pollnow
Scurry
GS SG SGS
SGS
Morrow
Productive Oil and acreage gas column (acres) (ft)
Pay thickness
Crude gravity
~b
k
S;
Pi
Ph
T
Solution Ultimate reGOR covery
(ft)
(~
(%)
(mD)
(%)
(psi)
(psi) (~
(cu ft/bbl) (MMbbl) (%).
40-42
10.2
20
22
2200
1780 132
IP
4-5
L
55000
250
D IP
2-5 1
D L
80 1700
60 28
68 28
35.8 34-38
25 11
103
1532 2265
0.3 9.1
14.3- 24 18.5 52 e 2 2
IP
1
L
1450
14
14
36
7.7
172
2390
2.0
2
IP
4
L
640
50
50.1
7.5
100
James Lime K San Andres P Leduc D
4 1 4
L D L
23000 1280 1390
624
75 86 477
46--48 32 37
11 9.6 8.8
3 320
Canyon IP Reef TrempealeauC
4
L
51000
775
233
43
7
1
D
100
42
Tubb Strawn B-Zone Strawn C-Zone Strawn
Lea
GS
Wolfcamp
P
1
L
920
35
Finney
S
Marmaton
IP
1
L
I100
8
Indiana Daviess Kansas Haskell
S W
Aux Vases Morrow
M IP
1 5
D L
400 10000
Kansas Decatur
S
LansingKansas City Canyon Reef Marmaton Greenbrier
IP
5
L
800
IP
4
L
11000
IP M
5 8
L D
300 6000
39 SharonTexas Scurry Ridge 40 Sun City Kansas Barber 41 Sycamore- West Calhoun Millstone Virginia
G W
75
3--13
20 5-10
37
5875 4225
11.7
5211 2040 2093
15
28
3122
7.8
49
25
1080
41.7
9.6
124
20
3569
33-35
17.8
38
20.5
176
98
44
8.8
44
17
0.57
32.8
1050
28
3135
38
1570 300
48
0.12 '
25
1608
70 5.1 320 f
11
26 2 27
1820 130
885
670
23.6
28
1045
307
90140 e 3.6 ~
30
29
1393 154
88
1500
2.53.Oct 4.0c~
300 983
38
34.4 46
170
50.8
38.5 29--32.5
4
10-12 13
667
Ref. No.
0.3 c 1900 128
* Considerable gas-cap drive, t Includes No. 208. ~ Includes No. 18. w Plus 10.95 MMbbl owing to water injection; estimated ultimate recovery under water injection is over 50%.
1153
25
1 7 1 1
51.9w
30
1.6 c
31 32
AC: Fracture-matrix porosity - solution-gas drive 42 Bitter Lake New Chaves South and Mexico West 43 Brown Texas Gaines 44 CottonwoodWyWashakie Creek oming 45 Devil's Mon- Mussel-
San Andres P
1-7
D
680
SGS S
Giorieta P Phosphoria P
6 5-6
D D
960 14200
G
Van Duzen M
1
L
80
Basin 46 Elk Basin
tana Mon-
shell Park-
Madison
M
1
D
8960
Carbon
A-Zone
47 Reeves 48 Yellow
tana, Wyoming Texas Texas
San Andres P San Andres P
5 6
D-L D
5480 3230
Fusselman Viola Strawn
5 5 4
L D L
1840 40 80
House AD: Undefined porosity 49 Big Spring Texas 50 Cairo North Kansas 51 Camp Texas Springs 52 Chaveroo
53 Davis 54 Gove
Yoakum Hockley
S S
- solution-gas drive Howard SG Pratt W Scurry SG
S O IP
New Chaves, Mexico Roosevelt
GS
San Andres P
5
D
11000
Kansas Wabaunsee Kansas Gove
G SG
Kansas IP LansingIP Kansas City Laurel S
1 1
L L
160
55 Greensburg Kentucky 56 Hanson Texas 57 Huat Texas 58 Lamesa Texas
Green, Taylor Crockett Gaines Dawson
10
20
13
2.5
38
0.07 c
44 21
33.8 30
7 10.4
16 16
35
5-10
28.2
17
13
28
12
47-368
20
33 32
11.6 12.1
2.7 0.5
14 4 5
48.3 37 43.5
11.9
4.7
40
26
6
0.7
25
1340
15
31
15
41.5
50
645
W SG SGS S
Grayburg Wolfcamp
168 55
920
88 20 40
20
80
4--6
2900 85 125 11261810
20-51
2264 700
200
2000 825 1540
106
D
14953
15
30
41.8
12
560
45
P P M
1-5 1-5 1
D L L
160 550 800
12
15 16 20
27 31.2 35
5 4.5 9
0.4 3
4600 4800
S M IP
1-2 1 4
D L L
1600 160 1160
106 20 162 22
29 37.5 42.6
9.5
0.75
3692
40 400
7.6
1.85
Fallon
GS
S
1
D
1760
185
180
33
11
1
3794
Fallon
GS
Stoney Mt. O
1
D
1760
210
62
33
1!
1
3794
Fallon
GS
Red River
1
D
2589
270
67
31
12.6
1
Barber Garza
W SG
M San Andres P
5 1
* Plus 1.9 MMbbl secondary, t Includes No. 144. ~ Intergranular porosity.
L D
6000 1740
0-50 250
10
34
1000 f
361
21 25
2 2
4.5
2 31 2
0.02 110
4001000
35
50 e
1.6 ~ 1.3 x 109 Mcf 3.0c-t-
18-26 34
25
36 1
62 Pennel
63 Rhodes 64 Rocker A
0.03'
36-39
3
O
2 33
2644
Salem Canyon Reef and Strawn Interlake
Pennel
62
4495
S S SG
Pennel
150 3.0* 313-452 182 f
64
West 59 Monarch Mont. Fallon 60 Montgomery~IndianaDaviess 61 Ocho Jaun Texas Scurry, Fisher Montana Montana Montana Kansas Texas
25
~J
23.6
3.6
45
2435
283
18
60 e
7
0.13 1.1 0.96
53 e
2 2 2
2.0 0.8 5.1
34 7 2
34 0.4 c
34 24
30 2.1 c 3.0
34 31 2
L~
Field name
State, County country
Exploration Productive Geologic Trap Reservoir discovery formation age mechanism rock type method
65 Rojo Caballos 66 Snyder North
Texas
Pecos
S
Morrow
IP
1-2
L
Texas
Scurry
R
IP
5
L
1000
66
Texas
Scurry
R
Strawn Upper B Zone Strawn Lower B Zone Strawn C Zone San Andres
IP
5
L
1000
65
95
Snyder North
Snyder Texas North 67 Welch Texas North 68 Westbrook Texas
Scurry
R
Dawson Terry Mitchell
S
Westbrook Texas
Mitchell
R
Productive Oil and acreage gas column (acres) (ft)
Pay thickness
Crude gravity
~b
k
S,
P~
Ph
T
Solution Ultimate reGOR covery
(ft)
(~ 53
(%)
(mD)
(%)
(psi)
(psi) (~
(cu ft/bbl) (MMbbl) (%)
5.5
0.1
40
40
16
3337
40
40
16
3337
13221
5.6
IP
5
L
P
6
D
6500
35
Upper ClearP Fork Lower ClearP Fork
5
D
480
5
D
20010
40
16
34
10
0.3
2100
450
25-26
5.75
3.5
420
270
255
600
24
6.34
4.9
1100
133
500
250
42
40
Ref. No.
140'
3401 3.6 c
2 2
51
2
B: Water Drive BA: Intercrystalline-intergranular porosity - water drive 69 Beaver Creek 70 Buckner 71 Coldwater 72 Damme 73 Dorcheat
WyFremont oming Arkan- Union sas Michiganlsabella
Kansas Finney Arkan- Union sas 74 Gila Illinois Jasper 75 Grayson Texas Reagan 76 Lerado SW Kansas Reno Lerado SW Kansas Reno 77 Little MontanaFallon Beaver 78 Little MontanaFallon Beaver East 79 Llanos Kansas Sherman Llanos Kansas Sherman 80 Magnolia Arkan- Columbia sas 81 Mt. Holly Arkan- Union sas
Madison
2-6
L
1260
Smackover J
1
L
1610
Rogers City D
1
D
3200
St. Louis M Smackover J
1 1
L L
2130
SG W SG SG GS
McClosky San Andres Lansing Viola Red River
M P P O O
5 1 1 1 1
L D L D L
540 320 200 200 1100
GS
Red River
O
1
L
500
SGS SGS W
Marmaton P Cherokee P Smackover J
1 1 1
L L L
160 40 4494
Smackover J
1
L
360
SG
M
15 3 10
308
8.7
10
20
50
30-35
49
7.1
01368
10-18
30-32 43.5
14
155
10
15
8 14 3 11 95
38.6 32 41 41 29
12
1.3
35
65
30
13.6
4.5
1500
170
5300
673 232
288
3250 1453
1190
4250
4250
512
20
1130
20
49
38
20.1 c
70
39 1 38
21.8 r
270
35.9-41.4 20.2-23.5 39 18.5
6
1.27 1.2
293" 117 e
3828
0.14 1.64
61 e 12
7 2 31 31 34
35
3828
0.85
5
34
20
1373 1115 3465
3465
220
38,
3405
3405
50 40 35
700
10.5 r
38
L~ I'~ I'O
82 New Texas Navarro W Richland 83 Ross Ranch Texas King G 84 Schuler Arkan- Union W sas BB: Vugular-solution porosity - water drive 85 Acheson
1-2
L
10
Strawn IP Smackover J
1 1
L L
650 1200
62 26
Leduc
D
4
L
3640
234
1460
159
40
26
Rodessa
K
86 Amrow
Alberta, Canada Texas Gaines
S
Devonian
D
1
D
87 Ashburn
Kansas Wabaunsee
SG
Viola
O
1
D-L
88 Bannatyne MontanaTeton 89 Bateman Texas King Ranch 90 Bonnie Alberta, Glen Canada 91 Bough New Lea Devonion Mexico 92Breedlove Texas Martin 93 Bronco Texas Yoakum 94 Comiskey Kansas Morris 95 Comiskey Kansas Morris Northeast 96 Coming MissouriHolt 97 Delphia MontanaMusselshell 98 Glen Park Alberta, Canada 99 Homeglen- Alberta, Rimbey Canada 100 Lea Texas Crane 101 Livengood Kansas Brown 102 Llanos Kansas Sherman
G G
Sun River Bunger
M IP
1 4
D L
100 680
25 20
Leduc
D
4
L
8800
711
S
Devonian
D
1
D
240
S S G SGS
Devonian Devonian Viola Viola
D D O O
1 1-2 1 1
D D D-L D-L
W S
Kimmswick O Amsden IP
1 1
Leduc
D
Leduc
D
103 Lundgren 104 Lundgren South 105 Magutex 106 McFarland
Kansas Gove Kansas Gove
GSG GSG
Eilenburger Hunton LansingKansas City Spergen Spergen
Texas Texas
145 265
D D
480
245
4
L
433
421
4
L
14053
553
2066 240 440
430 18
185
17
O S-D IP
1-2 1-5 1
D D L-D
M M
I 1
D D
S S
Devonian D Eilenburger O
1 1
D-L D
5760 400
107 Mill Creek Kansas Wabaunsee 108 Mound LakeTexas Terry
W SG
Viola O Fusselman S
1 5
D-L D
80 880
109 Newbury
W
Viola
1-3
D-L
160
Andrews Andrews
Kansas Wabaunsee
S W SGS
3520 1080 0 240
O
20
23
40
37 36-38
40
35.4 22-25
5 20
27 33
0.01 r 10 16.7
19 1200
9.1
3100
1085
0.03 ~
285 1631
2.7
9.4
350
6
2560
625ft
43
26
4580
0.09 r
25
41.3 43.4 19 22
9 6
150
200-250
31.5 33.6
46 47.5
120
4--8 17-25
24 38
3-5
24
2 38, 42
10.1
35 140 6 4
40 2(?)
40
5455
400
150 78
4.7 13
2-280 (20) 4 . 8 - 0.126-86 25.5 3890 10-20 2-25 43 16.5 115
10
4
6
21 16
930
149 f"
43
43 25-27 33.8-39.5 35 35
3530 200
2530
78
75 15-20
2360 3530
41
28 f
43
250
10
2570
1.8
v.h.
3730
505000
* Plus 10 Bcfgas-in-place (GiP). t Plus 430 Bcf GiP. ~ Plus 1.3 Tcf GiP. (B = billion = 109; T = trillion = 10t2.) r Oringinal reservoir volume, oil zone.
30
ll0f~
1320
20.9 0.1 c 0.03 r
1820 1120
0.005 c 0.1 r
5350 5702
253 r 166~
34 2
36 34
7.6
6-15
40 198~
0.7
2560
6--7 41 3.9--6 612670
36
1195 2800 7.6
54
2
31.2 25 0 0.2 ~
1604
15
164
203 '
5600 4789 1015 1030
9.6
13
0.1
43
750
367
635
46 2.0
2 2 36 36
43 135 e
2 36 1 1 1
200 e
2 2
1000 4680
0.3 c 1.9
36 2
1178
0.3 ~
36
Field name
State, County country
110 Outlook and MontanaSheridan South Outlook Outlook and South Outlook Outlookand South Outlook 111 Rocker A 112 Rosedale
Exploration Productive Geologic Trap Reservoir discovery formation age mechanism rock type method
S
WinnipegosisD
1
D
Productive Oil and acreage gas column (acres) (ft) 2240 ] [
Pay thickness
Crude gravity
~b
k
S i
P,.
Ph
T
Solution Ultimate reGOR covery
(ft)
(~
(%)
(mD)
(%)
(psi)
(psi) (~
(cu ft/bbl) (MMbbl) (%)
60
40
1.5-8
1
125
34 3.8
t MontanaSheridan
S
lnterlake
S
1
D
2240
MontanaSheridan
S
Red River
O
1
D
2240
Texas Garza Kansas Kingman
SG S
1 1
D L
113 Sabetha
Kansas Nemaha
S
Clear Fork P LansingIP Kansas City Hunton D
1
Sabetha
Kansas Nemaha
Viola
1
O
18
40
1.5-8
4186
20
20
33
5
4486
0.3
34
280 320
70 6
15 19
32-34 43
14
165
1229 1540
0.3 r
2 31
D
40
31
26.7
1000
0.05 r
36
D
30
12
2.56- 0--843 37.6 23.40 7.61- 0--6.0662.9 14.30
0.2 r
36
114 Strahm
Kansas Nemaha
S
Hunton
D
1
D
200
None
65
Strahm
Kansas Nemaha
S
Viola
O
1
D
80
25
20
S
Hunton Amsden
D IP
1 1
D D
80 200
48
65 5-10
D
1
D-L
210
58
12
44.1
S D
1 1-3
D D
1200 2700
167 45
15 0--50
40.2 39--41
100
46.1
0-350 (2) 10.5-- 3.615.8 45 7 25.3 6.5-- 0.119.8 110 10.2 267 15
950
18.3 9.4
1018 700
115 Strahm East Kansas Nemaha 116 Sumatra, MontanaRosebud North West 117 Terre-Haute Indiana Vigo East 118 Tex-Hamon Texas Dawson 119 Unger Kansas Marion 120 Vealmoor East 121 Wapella East 122 Wellman 123 Wilmington 124 Wizard Lake
Ref. No.
Texas
Howard, Borden Illinois De Witt
Texas Terry Kansas Wabaunsee Alberta, Canada
SG
23.226.9 27.428.6 24 27.3
S SGS
Fusselman Hunton
S
Cisco-Wolf- P camp Niagaran S
4
L
3600
610
1--4
D
400
48
22
30.5
Wolfcamp Viola Leduc
4 1 4
L D L
1200 320 3250
738 17 646
280 33
41-44 20.5
W
W
P O D
34
1180 910
14.1
2.66130.4
2-25
1340
35
0.003 c 228 e
640 1981 630
35 51.391.4
5066 620
1.8 154
3362
9001000
360
48 7
4150 985 2510
25
350 50
7
1.1 c 4.1 c
35
2 36
37.8
105 e
2
1.5 1290 150
36 34
13.4 r 380 r
7 2 36 43
I'Q "~
BC: Fracture-matrix p o r o s i t y - water drive 125 Woman's Pocket Anticline 126 Big Wall
MontanaGolden Valley
MontanaMusselshell 127 Black Leaf MontanaTeton 128 Cabin MontanaFallon Creek 129 Crossroads New Lea South Mexico 130 Deer Creek MontanaDawson Deer Creek MontanaDawson 131 Dupo Illinois St. Clair 132 Elk Basin WyPark oming 133 Richey MontanaDawson, McCone 134 Sumatra, MontanaRosebud Northwest 135 Wolf MontanaYellowSprings stone
G
Amsden
IP
1
D
10
11
WS
Amsden'
IP
1
D
600
60
S S
Madison Madison
M M
1 1-2
D D
6700
S-D
1-5
D-L
1-2 1-2 1 1
D D L D
160 480 1020 8960
S
lnterlake S Red River O KimmswickO Madison B M Zone Madison M
1
D
1700
S
Piper
J
1
L
3260
S
Amsden
IP
1
D
2560
M IP
1-5
D L
480
20
D M M
1 1 1
D D-L D-L
200 320
P
4
D
680
S-O
1-2
D
6700
1
L
120 7
S S S G
19
1500
25
4867
35 35
4500
34 34
33
7.5 12
25
52
10
38 90 100 24
43 41 32.7 28
53
39
7 6.7 14 1011.5 4
40
27.3
5-30
31
3 12
33.3 27
15 47
30 19 18
29 40 38
6 6
146
95
36.8
4.5
695
33
2
24.8
7
19.3
61
20
29.5 23 23 41
7
28
4564
0.7 c
44 44 2
45
5
30
4609
1.9 c
2
10
800 4180
30
80(?) 25
100 920
20
34
16
600
1250
25
19
3.25
35
0.4 ~
17
7.7 3-11
168
350
1400 30
500 135 9 83 e 2.9 1000 f
25 24
34 34 7 35
4
25
34
5.4
50
34
3539 1973
1.64.8
0.11000
25
2758
BD: Undefined porosity - water drive 136 Ash Grove Kansas Dickinson 137 Bantam NebraskaHarlan
SG Kansas City Hunton Charles Madison
138 Barada 139 Bredette 140 Bredette North 141 Brown
NebraskaRichardson MontanaRoosevelt S MontanaDaniels, S Roosevelt Texas Gaines SG
142 Cabin Creek 143 Cary
MontanaFallon
S
Miss- Sharkey issippi Kansas Wabaunsee
S G
Hunton
D
!
D
40
Kansas Wabaunsee
G
Viola
O
1
D
680
144Davis Ranch Davis Ranch 145 Dawson Dawson 146 Dollarhide East Dollarhide East
WichitaAlbany
Selma
0.2 c
56 53
3110 3125
2.6 ~ 0.2 0.5
79
30
3043
12
3.25
20
4180
30
O-
45
361
131
254
36 44
50 50
3.0 51 0.2 c
44 34 34 2
30
34 45
1124
NebraskaRichardson NebraskaRichardson Texas Andrews S
Hunton D Viola O Fusselman S
! 1 1-2
D L L
800
100
20 13 62
Texas
Ellenburger O
1-2
D
1680
250
107
Andrews
880
S
992 12
188
64
36
1120 0.5 c
t.~ t,~
Field name
147 Eagle Springs Fairplay Falls City Fradean Gingrass Goodrich
148 149 150 151 152
State, County country
Exploration Productive Geologic Trap Reservoir discovery formation age mechanism rock type method
Productive Oil and acreage gas column (acres) (fl)
Nevada Nye
W
Sheep Pass T (e)
2
L
Kansas Marion NebraskaRichardson Texas Upton Kansas Harvey Kansas Sedgwick
G GS SG SG W
Hunton Hunton Ellenburger Hunton LansingKansas City
S-D S-D O S-D IP
1 1-2 1 1-5 1
D D D D L
120 1080 800 30 600
M S-D S-D O IP P
1 1 1-5 1-5 1 1
L D D D L D
600 600 400 80 7120
IP-P
4
L
850
Goodrich Kansas Sedgwick Goodrich Kansas Sedgwick 153 Greenwich Kansas Sedgwick Greenwich Kansas Sedgwick 154 HaussermanNebraskaHarlan 155 Howard Texas Howard, Glasscock Glassock, Sterling Mitchell
W W W W G
Hunton Hunton Arbuckle Kansas City GlorietaClear Fork
Pay thickness
Crude gravity
~
k
S.
Pi
Pb
T
Solution Ultimate reGOR covery
(ft)
(~
(%)
(mD)
(%)
(psi)
(psi) (~
(cu ft/bbl) (MMbbl) (%)
200
26-29 14 93 370 11
7 23 35 52
35
30 18 35 2-3 12
36-37 30 50 34 34.2
2.0 c 0.3 ' 5.0 c 6.0 0.04 c
820
8
4200 975
5
46
197 ~
52 c 39 41.5 36.5 36 27.4
10
4
115
37.6
6.7
61
7.715 815.6 10.518.1 14.618.7 14-18 4-7 9
0.30.8 0.64.5 0.8-5.4 1.522 3.85.4 12-76 135
2-3 12 12 12
7
13~*
40
J'39 x 106 Mcf 156 Huat Canyon 157 Hugoton Hugoton 158 Hugoton Hugoton
Texas
Gaines
SGS
500
Morton, Kansas ,ifStevens,
W
Herington
P
5
L-D
2560000
5--10
Gas
[Seward,
w
Krider
P
5
L-D
2560000
25-35
Gas
Kansas
] Staunton, Kansas ] Grant,
Kansas ] Haskell, Hamilton, / Hugoton Kansas [Kearney, Finney 159 Hutex Texas Andrews 160 John Creek Kansas Morris 161 Lerado Kansas Reno Lerado Kansas Reno Lerado Kansas Reno 162 Magutex Texas Andrews 163 Pine Montana ~Fallon Pine Montana{Prairie Pine Montana LWibaux 164 Shubert NebraskaRichardson 165 Snethen NebraskaRichardson 166 Tex-Hamon Texas Dawson
W
Winfield
P
5
L-D
2560000
20--35
Gas
W
Towanda
P
5
L
2560000
25-40
Gas
W
Fort Riley
P
5
L
2560000
15-20
Gas
S G W W W S GS GS GS
Devonian Viola Lansing
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
D-L D L L D D D D D-L D L D
60 18
44 25.5 43.2 Gas 43.2 45.1 34 34 34 23 27 39
S
D O IP M Viola O Ellenburger O Interlake S Stoney Mt. O Red River O Hunton D Viola O Montoya O
4480 1960 750 750 750 2160 8380 8380 8380
270 75 3 40 10 70
400
67
19 140 80 225 7 113
361
4539 50-65
435
!
Ref. No.
36 36 2 36 36 36 36 36 36 44 2
2
"9.6
1
4.4 x 109
1
Mcf~
1
350 1
24.838 31.642.5 22.839.6 27
1
34 63.5
5400 1050
23 3.78 3.78 3.78
30 30 30
6013 4160 4160 4160
23.1
20
1055 5051
322
157
25.4 2 1,3 c 36 2.4 31 2.2 x 106 Mcf31 31 10c 2 } 34 55 30 34 34 44 0.12 c 44 35 2
L~ bO
167 Valley Kansas Sedgwick Center 168 Wells Texas Dawson Devonian 169Willowdale Kansas Kingman
S-D
SGS S
0-113
1-5
W
D-L
1200
175
3.36
5180
7-11
2
41.1
840
Viola
34-35
* Includes No. 228.
C: Gas-Cap Drive CA: Intercrystalline-intergranular porosity - gas-cap drive 170 Eubank
Kansas Haskell
W
171 Maydelle 172 Novinger 173 Opelika
Texas Cherokee Kansas Meade Texas Henderson
G SG
174 Plainville 175 Wilde 176 Wilsey
Indiana Daviess Kansas Morris Kansas Morris
LansingKansas City - E Zone Rodessa Marmaton Rodessa
IP
1-5
960
K IP K
1 4 1-2
1200 2400 11200
Salem Lansing Lansing
M IP IP
36
14
Gas
40
20 15.3 20
52 42 44
200 1080 640
100
13300 5000 1100
1068
16000
16
1105
61
4035
41 1 20--30 41, 47 3.4 x 106 Mcf 7 36 36
2.0 c 3400
11-17 59
3400
1400
550
Gas Gas Gas
CB: Vugular-solution porosity-- gas-cap drive 177 Coyanosa 178 Fishook 179 Wichita
Texas Pecos SGS Illinois Adams, Pike W Kansas Sedgwick W
Devonian D Edgewood S Viola O
1-2 1 1
Ellenburger O
1-2
10 54 0.84240
20
5.6 x 106 McF 2 3 Bcf 7 0.8 c 36
20
162 14 4
53.4 Gas 38
8.1 20 7.814.6
5OO
135
Gas
6.7
1-100 35
6648
1.5 x 108Mcf~
1715
790
51.2 d
1.33
0.56
6964
4.3 x 106 Mcf ~ 2
58O
140
56 d
12
1
3000
65
Gas
1 . 0 + 3 x 107 Mcf 109 Mcf
44.375.9
5937 119 1280
CC: Fracture-matrix p o r o s i t y - gas-cap drive 180 BrownBassett 181 Coyanosa
Texas Texas
Terrell, Crockett Pecos
S
D
Ellenburger O
1-2
D
8960
SG
Devonian
1
L
8OO
W
Greenwood IP
5-6
L
160000
SGS
Strawn
1-5
D-L
1440
40
44
10
S
Smackover
1
D-L
1280
361
49.4
14
SG SG
Devonian D Ellenburger O
1-2 1-2
L-D D
12160 23680
180 1030
49.5 d 53 d
SGS
10
2
CD: Undefined p o r o s i t y - gas-cap drive 182 Fradean
Texas
Upton
183 Greenwood Kansas, Morton, CoioradoBaca 184 Levelland Texas Hockley Northeast 185 Loring Miss- Madison issippi 186 Puckett Texas Pecos 187 Puckett Texas Pecos
D
IP
181 1600
435
O27.9
27
3250
25
5890
21000
0.8 c 1.9 x 10s McF 7.9 x lOs Mcft
2 1
45 2 2
q~ t'~
Field name
State, County country
Exploration Productive Geologic Trap Reservoir discovery formation age mechanism rock type method
Pi
Ph
T
Solution Ultimate reGOR covery
(roD) (%)
(psi)
(psi) (~
(cu ft/bbl) (MMbbl) (%)
500
3395
2520
950
Productive Oil and acreage gas column (acres) (ft)
Pay thickness
Crude gravity
~
k
(ft)
(~
(%)
89300
200
29-38
22
S.
Ref. No.
D: Open-Combination Drive DA: Intercrystalline-intergranular porosity - open combination drive 188 Abqaiq 189 Adell Northwest 190 Aden Consolidated and Aden South Aden Consolidated and Aden South Aden Consolidated and Aden South Aden Consolidated and Aden South Aden Consolidated and Aden South 191 Bahrain 192 Dale Consolidated Dale Consolidated Dale Consolidated
Saudi "Arabia Kansas Decatur Illinois Wayne, Hamilton
Arab D W S
J
2700
Rosiclare
2700
1170
31-39
320
LansingIP Kansas City Ohara M
7-8
38-41.5
8700
48
0.8 c
1
15.5
7
5-12 Illinois Wayne, Hamilton
S
Illinois Wayne, Hamilton
S
Illinois Wayne, Hamilton
S
Illinois Wayne, Hamilton
S
Bahrain Illinois Hamilton, Saline Illinois Hamilton, Saline
M
700
McClosky
M
2700
Salem
M
6001040
7.5
8-27
2700 1750
8-20
Warsaw
M
2700 I10
Second Pay K Ohara M
20000
S
Rosiclare
20000
Illinois Hamilton Saline
S
McClosky
M
193 Damme
Kansas Finney
SG
Marmaton
IP
194 Feeley
Kansas Decatur
W
Lansing
IP
2030
40
14
S
M
2.2 b
t 5
160
124
96
140
142
[125"
1150
23
49
7
800
34.837.2 3031 3439 39
278
800
5-15
20000
1236
340
1632 222
510
0.6 c
!
0.3 c
1
149
50, 51
t,~ OO
195 GhwarSaudi Ain-Dar Arabia 196 GhwarSaudi Fazran Arabia 197 GhwarSaudi Harah Arabia 198 GhwarSaudi Hawiyan Arabia 199 GhwarSaudi Shedgum Ambia 200 GhwarSaudi Uthmaniyan 201 Howard Texas Howard, Glasscock Glasscock, Sterling, Mitchell
G
Arab D
J
1
L-D
4000
1140
143
35
22
290
Amb D
J
1
L-D
136500
987
150
35
23
270
Amb D
J
1
L-D
110100
1369
103
33
21
220
Arab D
J
1
L-D
298600
1094
61
33
19
68
1126
60
33
16
52
80
31.7
10.5
Arab D
J
1
L-D
4100
Arab D
J
1
L-D
47400
San Andres P Grayburg
1
D
15620
Pleasant Prairie
KentuckyOhio Kansas Finney Kearney, Haskell Kansas Finney Kearney, Haskell
570
7515
1910 215
570
6443
1830 215
520
10989
1715 215
450
83
1595 215
420
429
50, 51 50, 51 50, 51 50, 51 50, 51
40 2 7
82 202 Jingo 203 Pleasant Prairie
5
1920 215
SG W
W
Salem M LansingIP Kansas City St. Louis
5 5
L L
8--27
90
41.5
8-27 12.5
0.1125
280
64.5
46.1
12 5--38
33 32-36
14.3
8 18
34 33.9
10
35.2
39
8.0
39.4
M
1-5
L
10000
Lansing Amsden
IP IP
1 1-5
L D
160 320
Leduc
D
4
L
21640
SG
S
4
L
320
161
S
M
5
L-D
1100
15
t
DST 1025 1045
1.2c'1 9 1
DB: Vugular-solution porosity - open-combination drive 204 Enlow 205 Gage
Kansas Edwards MontanaMusselshell 206 LeducAlberta, Woodbend Canada 207 New Baden, Illinois Clinton East 208 Nunn Kansas Finney 209 Ozona, East
Texas
Crockett
210 Pegasus
Texas
Midland, Upton
Alberta, Canada 212 Ropes and Texas Hockley South Ropes 213 Shallow Kansas Scott Water
S G
SG
Alberta, Canada
15
26-28
Ellenburger O
2
D
Ellenburger O
1-2
D
10000
800
Leduc
D
4
L
37833
101
S
Canyon
IP
4
L
1320
100
S
St. Louis
M
1-5
L
500
100
26-28
Leduc
D
4
L
1757
589
42
211 Redwater
214 Westerose
232
101
0.09 c 0.5
48 1000
15
1894
1894 150
553
655 DST 9.5-
22-
11.9
166
41267 55 0 Bcf 0.02
43, 52 7 1
7.4
45
3391
53
2-8
30
5668
2.7 b
6.5
500
25
1050
42
8.5
66
26.9
3754
1934
31 34
23
54--72 d
9.3
25
7
2570
275 Mcf/ac-ft 3386 485 94
2570 178
1556
2
40
53
64
54
195
817
368
59
2
2.0 c
1
650
121 77~ { 117 Bcf
43
L/I b9
Field name
State, County country
Exploration Productive Geologic Trap Reservoir discovery formation age mechanism rock type method
Productive Oil and acreage gas column (acres) (fl)
Pay Crude thickness gravity (fi)
(~
(%)
(mD)
(%)
Pl
Ph
T
Solution Ultimate reGOR covery
(psi)
(psi) (~
(cu ft/bbl) (MMbbl) (%)
Ref. No.
DC: Fracture-matrix porosity - open-combination drive 215 Blackfoot 216 Gypsy Basin 217 Waterloo 218 West Brady 219 West Edmond
MontanaGlacier MontanaPondera, Teton Illinois Monroe MontanaPondera Okla- Canadian homa
S W
Sun River Madison
M M
1-7 2
D-L L-D
GW SG W
Kimmswick O Sun River M Bois d'Arc M
I 1-5 3-6
L D L
SG
Devonian
D
2-3
L
S
St. Louis
M
1
L-D
6-15 133
40
25 34.5
14.2 14
264 305
230 !0 29240
50 !0 600
30 15 70
30.2 28.1 41
7.4 5.3
40 0-20
15
3145
5420
500
0-100
42
20
3.5
40
2500
440
955 1038
34 34
2770 145150
I010
0.24 7 0.005 34 ~I05 25-35 55, t961Bcf 56
DD: Undefined porosity - open-combination drive 220 Crosset South-El Cinco 221 Dale Consolidated 222 Deerhead 223 Dwyer 224 Fanska 225 Fertile Prairie 226 Gas City 227 Giendive
Texas
Crockett
Illinois Hamilton, Saline Kansas Barber MontanaSheridan Kansas Marion MontanaFallon
G S W S
Viola Madison Warsaw Red River
O M M O
2-5 1 1 1
D L D L-D
MontanaDawson MontanaDawson
S S
Red River Red River
O O
1-2 1-2
D L
1080 1040
320
MontanaDawson
S
Stony Niybtaub
O
1-2
D
1040
228 Greenwich Kansas Sedgwick Kansas Decatur 229 Hardesty
W W
1-5 l
L L
230 Neva West Texas Schleicher MontanaPondera, 231 Pondera Teton Kansas Sedgwick 232 Valley Center Valley Kansas Sedgwick Center 233 Warner Kansas Decatur
S W
M LansingIP Kansas City Strawn IP Madison M
4 3-6
L D
LansingIP Kansas City Viola O
l
L
160
12
2-14
34-35
5
D
1800
76
20-30
34-35
1-2
L
360
4
34.6
Glendive
W W SGS
LansingIP Kansas City
5-15
20000 880
65
7 0.8c:
32 32.9 33 33.4
5---6
38.2 38
II 6.5
30 35
60
31 f ~150 [
38
6.5
35
1400 160
16
60 4-15
44 29-39
2052 6000
166 58
30
45 27-38
* Includes No. 221. t Includes No. 37. :[:Efficient gravity-segregation drive; with some gas injection. w Plus 1.4 x 103 Mcfgas.
17
200
15 (?) 50 13 49
240 240
750
I0 24
3O
750 3520
0.3c I.I
160
4.0 f ~mo.4 [
24 25
7 14
2.5 82
28 45
2551
34
14.0 19.0 l }23.fF J
930
36
0.3 c
849
34 34
24
13.0 c I 170
31 34 36 34
I
35
2 34 36 36 1
t.~
E: Closed-Combination Drive EA: lntercrystalline-intergranular porosity- closed-combination drive 234 Turner Valley
Alberta, Canada
G
Turner Valley
M
1-2
1050f
9.812.8
6.84
10
2775
47--49
7.07
200
26
3363
154
180302
36.140
7-11
159-- 5.6460 8.2
25012623
187- 355195 765
483
172
32
7
32
49.1
6.5-7
2921
146
O.IY
16275
156
12175
10.5 500
800
758
149
880
EB: Vugular-solution porosity- closed-combination drive 235 Alison Northwest 236 Rainbow Area (typical) 237 Zama Area (typical)
New Lea, Mexico Roosevelt Alberta, Canada Alberta, Canada
S
Cisco
IP
S
Keg River
D
S
Keg River
D
Strawn
IP
1
L
80
IP
1
D
34000
M IP M D
1-5 2-5
L-D
978
19
F: Unknown Drive FA: Vugular-solution porosity - unknown drive 238 Tex Hamon Texas
Dawson
S
70
FB: Fracture-matrix porosity - unknown drive 239 Indian Basin
New Eddy Mexico
SGS
207
4.3
0.11780
25
FC: Undefined porosity - unknown drive 240 241 242 243
Bear's Den Otto Tex-Hamon Valley Center
MontanaLiberty Texas Schleicher Texas Dawson Kansas Sedgwick
SG SG S W
Madison Strawn Hunton
Source: After Langnes et al., 1972; courtesy of Elsevier Publ. Co.
1
250 480 240
30
18 6
39 38-41 37.5
15
470 137
6-18
0.1 O.OY 0.09 c
5 L~ L~ l,-,,,a
532 References to Table XXXVIII 1. Kansas Geological Society, 1959. Kansas Oil and Gas Fields, Vol. II, Western Kansas. Kansas Geol. Soc., p. 207. 2. West Texas Geological Society, 1966. Oil and Gas Fields in West Texas. West Texas Geol. Soc., Midland, Tex., p. 398. 3. Herbeck, E.F. and Blanton, J.R., 1961. Ten years of miscible displacement in Block 31 Field. J. Pet. Tech., 13(6)i 5 4 3 - 549. 4. Goss, L.E. and Vague, J.R., 1962. Pressure maintenance operations-Fort Chadbourne Field-Odom Lime Reservoir. Paper SPE 406, 3 7th Annual Fall Meeting, Los Angeles, Calif.., Oct. 5. Gealy, F.D.Jr., 1967. North Foster U n i t - evaluation and control of a Grayburg-San Andres waterflood based on primary oil production and waterflood response. Paper SPE 1474 presented at SPE Permian Basin Oil Recovery Conference Midland, Tex., May. 6. Hoss, R.L., 1948. Calculated effect of pressure maintenance on oil recovery. Petrol. Trans. AIME, 174:121 130. 7. Miller, D.N.Jr., 1968. Geology and Petroleum Production of the Illinois Basin. Illinois and Indiana-Kentucky Geol. Socs., p. 301. 8. Donohoe, C.W. and Bohannan, D.L., 1965. Harmattan-Eikton F i e l d - a case for engineered conservation and management. J. Pet. Tech., 17(9): 1171 - 1178. 9. Akins, D.W.Jr., 1951. Primary high pressure water flooding in the Pettit Lime Haynesville Field. Pet. Trans. AIME, 192:239 - 248. 10. Goolsby, J.L. and Anderson, R.C., 1964. Pilot water flooding in a dolomite reservoir, the McElroy Field. J. Pet. Tech., 16(12): 1345- 1350. 11. Trube, A.S.Jr., 1950. High-pressure water injection for maintaining reservoir pressures, New Hope Field, Franklin County, Texas. Pet. Trans. AIME, 189:325 - 334. 12. Gray, R. and Kenworthy, J.D., 1962. Early results show wide range of recoveries in two Texas Panhandle water floods. J. Pet. Tech., 14(12): 1323-1326. 13. Henry, J.C. and Moring, J.D., 1968. Flood evaluation yields vital guidelines. Pet. Eng., Aug.: 5 7 - 59. 14. Neslage, F.J., 1951. Gas injection in Dolomite reservoir, West Pampa Repressuring Association Project as of January 1, 1951. Proc., Second Oil Recovery Conference, Texas Petroleum Research Committee, pp. 142. 15. Marrs, D.G., 1961. Field results of miscible-displacement program using liquid propane driven by gas, Parks Field Unit, Midland County, Texas. J. Pet. Tech., 13(4): 3 2 7 - 332. 16. Barton, H.B. and Dykes, F.R.Jr. Performance of the Pickton Field. Pet. Trans. AIME, Reprint Series 4:83 88. 17. Sessions, R.E., 1960. How Atlantic operates the Slaughter Flood. Oil and Gas J., July: 91 - 98. 18. Hiltz, R.G., Huzarevich, J.V. and Leibrock, R.M., 1951. Performance characteristics of the Slaughter Field Reservoir. Proc. Second Oil Recovery Conference, Texas Petroleum Research Committee, pp. 1 4 6 - 157. 19. Sessions, R.E., 1963. Small propane slug proving success in Slaughter Field Lease. J. Pet. Tech., 15(1 ): 31 -36. 20. Fickert, W.E., 1965. Economics of water flooding the Grayburg Dolomite in South Cowden Field. Proc. Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Petroleum Short Course, Texas Technological College, Lubbock, Tex, April pp. 22-23. 21. Allen, W.W., Herriot, H.P. and Stiehler, R.D., 1969. History and performance prediction of Umm Farud Field, Libya. J. Pet. Tech., 21(5): 5 7 0 - 578. 22. Borgan, R.L., Frank, J.R. and Taikington, G.E., 1965. Pressure maintenance by bottom-water injection in a massive San Andres Dolomite reservoir. J. Pet. Tech., 17(8): 883 - 888. 23. Miller, F.H. and Perkins, A., 1960. Feasibility of flooding thin, tight limestones. Pet. Eng., Apr.: B55 B75. 24. Burchell, P.W. and Coonts, H.L., 1964. Review of secondary recovery operations in the Greater Aneth area, San Juan County, Utah. Producers Monthly, July: 1 0 - 14. 25. Kinney, E.E. and Schatz, F.L., 1967. The Oil and Gas Fields of Southeastern New Mexico. Roswell Geol. Soc., Roswell, N.M., p. 185. 26. Latimer, J.R.Jr. and Oliver, F.L., 1963. The Fairway Field of East Texas: its development and efforts toward unitization. Paper SPE 703 presented at SPE 38th Annual Fall Meeting, New Orleans, La. 27. Larson, V.C., Peterson, R.B. and Lacey, J.W., 1967. Technology's role in Alberta's Golden Spike Miscible Project. Paper P.D. 12 (9) presented at the Seventh Worm Pet. Cong., Mexico City. 28. Allen H.H. and Thomas J.B., 1959. Pressure maintenance in SACROC Unit operations, January 1, 1959.,]. Pet. Tech., 11(11 ): 42 - 48. -
119
-
533 29. Sutton, E., 1965. Trempealeau reservoir performance, Morrow County Field, Ohio. J. Pet. Tech., 17(12): 1391- 1395. 30. Lacik, H.A. and Black, J.L.Jr., 1961. Pressure maintenance operations in the Sharon Ridge Canyon Unit, Scurry County, Texas, J. Pet. Tech., 13(7): 645-648. 31. Kansas Geological Society: 1956. Kansas Oil and Gas Pools, Vol 1, South Central Kansas. Kansas Geol. Soc., p. 97. 32. Wasson, J.A., 1967. Secondary oil-recovery possibilities in the basal Greenbrier Dolomite Zone, Sycamore-Millstone Field, Sherman District, Calhoun County, W.Va. USBM Rept. Invest. 7049, p. 20. 33. Willingham, R.W. and McCaleb, J.A., 1967. The influence of geologic heterogeneities on secondary recovery from the Permian Phosphoria Reservoir, Cottonwood Creek, Wyoming. Paper SPE 1770 presented at SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyo. 34. Abrassart, C.P., Nordquist, J.W. and Johnson, M.C. 1958. Montana Oil and Gas Fields Symposium. Billings Geol. Soc., p. 247. 35. Wayhan, D.A. and McCaleb, J.A., 1969. Elk Basin Madison heterogeneity- its influence on performance. J. Pet. Tech., 21(2)" 153-159. 36. Curtis, G.R., 1960. Kansas Oil and Gas Fields, Vol. III, Northeastern Kansas. Kansas Geol. Soc., p. 220. 37. Pollock, C.B., 1960. Beaver Creek Madison, Wyoming's deepest water injection project. J. Pet. Tech., 12(1): 3 9 - 4 1 . 38. Bruce, W.A., 1944.A study of the Smackover Limestone Formation and the reservoir behavior of its oil and condensate pools. Pet. Trans. AIME, 155:88 - 119. 39. Criss, C.R. and McCormick, R.L., History and performance of the Coldwater Oil Field, Michigan. Pet. Trans. AIME, Reprint Series 4" 5 5 - 63. 40. Winham, H.F., 1943. An engineering study of the Magnolia Field in Arkansas. Pet. Trans. AIME, 151" 15 34. 41. Herald, F.A., 1951. Occurrence of Oil and Gas in Northeast Texas. Univ. of Texas, Bureau of Economic Geology, Austin, Tex., p. 449. 42. Kaveler, H.H., 1944. Engineering features of the Schuler Field and unit operations. Pet. Trans. AIME, 155" 58-87. 43. Hnatiuk, J. and Martinelli, J.W., 1967. The relationships of the Westerose D-3 Pool to other pools of the common aquifer. J. Can. Pet. Tech., Apr-June: 4 3 - 4 9 . 44. Finch, W.C., Cullen, A.W., Sandberg, G.W., Harris, J.D. and McMahon, B.E., 1955. The Oil and Gas Fields of Nebraska. Rocky Mt. Assoc. Geologists, Denver, Colo., p. 264. 45. Frascogna, X.M., 1969. Mesozoic-Paleozoic Producing Areas of Mississippi and Alabama. Mississippi Geol. Soc. Jackson, Miss., p. 139. 46. Garfield, R.F., 1969. International Oil and Gas Development. Intern. Oil Scouts Assoc, Austin, Tex. Part 1, XXXIX: 496. 47. Clay, T.W. Pressure maintenance by gas injection in Opelika Field of Henderson County, Texas. Oil and Gas J. Reprint Series on Secondary Recovery, pp. 54 - 57. 48. Stanley, T.L., 1960. Approximation of gas-drive recovery and front movement in the Abqaiq Field, Saudi Arabia. Pet. Trans. AIME, 219: 274. 49. Cotter, W.H., 1962. Twenty-three years of gas injection into a highly undersaturated crude reservoir. J. Pet. Tech., 14(4): 361 - 365. 50. Bramkamp, R.A. and Powers, R.W., 1958. Classification of Arabian carbonate rocks. Bull. GSA, 69(10): 1305- 1318. 51. Steineke, M., Bramkamp, R.A. and Sander, N.J., 1958. Stratigraphic relations of Arabian Jurassic oil.habitat ofoil. Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol., pp. 1294- 1329. 52. Horsfield, R., 1962. Performance of the Leduc D-3 Reservoir. Pet. Trans. AIME, Reprint Series 4: 6 5 - 72. 53. Cargile, L.L., 1969. A case history of the Pegasus Ellenburger Reservoir. J. Pet. Tech., 21(10): 1 3 3 0 1336. 54. Willmon, G.J., 1967. A study of displacement efficiency in the Redwater Field. J. Pet. Tech., 19(4): 449 456. 55. Elkins, L.F., 1969. Internal anatomy of a tight, fractured Hunton Lime Reservoir revealed by performance - West Edmond Field. J. Pet. Tech., 21(2): 221 - 232. 56. Littlefield, M., Gray, L.L. and Godbold, A.C. A reservoir study of the West Edmond Hunton Pool, Oklahoma. Pet. Trans. AIME, Reprint Series 4: 8 9 - 107. 57. White, R.J., 1960. Oil Fields of Alberta. Alberta Soc. Pet. Geol., p. 272. 58. Robertson, J.W., 1969. New life begins for Alberta's Keg River Pinnacle Reefs. World Oil., Sept.: 8 7 90.
534 REFERENCES Aalund, L. and Rappold, K., 1993. Horizontal drilling taps more oil in the Middle East. Oil & Gas J., 91(25): 47 - 51. Abernathy, B.E, 1964. Waterflood prediction methods compared to pilot performance in carbonate reservoirs. J. Petrol. Tech., 16: 2 7 6 - 282. Abou-Sayed, A.S., 1993. The changing face of hydraulic fracturing improves reservoir management. In: Dowell Suppl., Petrol. Eng. Intern., 65(10): 16 pp. Acuna, J.A. and Yortsos, Y.C., 1991. Numerical construction and flow simulation in networks of fractures using fractal geometry. SPE 22703, Form. Eval. and Reserv. Geol. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 66th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Dallas, TX, 14 pp. Adler, EM., 1986. Transport processes in fractals. VI. Stokes flow through Sierpinski carpets. Phys. Fluids, 29(1): 15 - 22. Aharony, A., Hinrichsen, E.L., Hansen, A., Feder, J., Jossang. T. and Hardy, H.H., 1991. Effective renormalization group algorithm for transport in oil reservoirs. Physica A, 177:260 - 266. Algeo, T.J., Phillips, M., Jaminski, J. and Fenwick, M., 1994. High-resolution X-radiography of laminated sediment cores. J. Sediment. Res., A64(3): 665 - 668. A1-Muhairy, A. and Farid, E.A., 1993. Horizontal drilling improves recovery inAbu Dhabi. Oil & Gas J., 91(37): 5 4 - 56. AI-Zarafi, A., 1993. Breathing new life into a thin oil column by horizontal drilling. SPE 25532,Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Middle East Oil Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Bahrain, pp. 215 - 222. Ameri, S. and Rieke, H.H., 1981. Use of well logs to provide formation design values for hydraulic fracture treatments. SPE 10367, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Eastern Reg. Meet., Columbus, OH, pp. 47 - 56. Andresen, K.H., Baker, R.I. and Raoofi, J., 1963. Development of methods for analysis of Iranian Asmari reservoirs, Proc. 6th World Petrol. Congr, II: 13 - 27. Arab, N., Kazi, A. and Rieke, H.H., 1994. Fractal geometry of faults in relation to the 12 October 1992 Cairo earthquake. Nat. Hazards, 10:221 - 233. Araktingi, U.G., Bashore, W.M., Tran, T.T.B. and Hewett, T.A., 1991. Integration of seismic and well log data in reservoir modeling. Third Internat. Reservoir Characterization Tech. Conf. Preprints, Vol. 1: Technical Papers. Nat. Inst. Petrol. Energy Res. and U.S. Dept. of Energy, Bartlesville, OK, DOE Conf.-911125, Paper 3RC-01" 40 pp. Araktingi, U.G., Hewett, T.A. and Tran, T.T.B., 1993. GEOLITH; An interactive geostatistical modeling application. SPE Computer Applications, April, pp. 17 - 23. Archie, G.E., 1952. Classification of carbonate reservoir rocks and petrophysical considerations. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 36(2): 2 7 8 - 298. Aronofsky, J.S., Mass6, L. and Natanson, S.G., 1958.A model for the mechanism of oil recovery from the porous matrix due to water invasion in fractured reservoirs. Trans. AIME, 2 1 3 : 1 7 - 1 9 . Arps, J.J., 1968. Reasons for differences in recovery efficiency. SPE 2608, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Symp. on Petrol. Economics and Valuation, Dallas, TX, pp. 77 - 82. Arps, J.J., Brons, E, van Everdingen, A.F., Buchwald, R.W. and Smith, A.E., 1967. A Statistical Study of Recovery Efficiency. Bull. Am. Petrol. Inst., D14:33 pp. Arya, A., Hewett, T.A., Larson, R.G. and Lake, L.W., 1988. Dispersion and reservoir heterogeneity. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Reserv. Eng., 3(1): 1 3 9 - 148. Aud, W.W., Sullivan, R.B., Coalson, E.B., Poulson, T.D. and Warembourg, EA., 1992. Acid refracturing program increases reserves, Cottonwood Creek Unit, Washakie County, Wyoming..1. Petrol. Tech., 44(1): 91 - 97. Babson, E.C., 1965. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Distinguished Lecture Series. Barbe, J.A. and Schnoefelen, D.J., 1987. Quantitative analysis of infill performance: Robertson Clearfork unit.,/. Petrol. Tech., 39(12): 1 5 9 3 - 1601. Barber, A.H. Jr., George, C.J., Stiles, L.H. and Thompson, B.B., 1983. Infill drilling to increase reserves - actual experience in nine fields in Texas, Oklahoma, and Illinois. J. Petrol. Tech., 35(8): 1 5 3 0 - 1538. Barfield, E.C., Jordan, J.K. and Moore, W.D., 1959. An analysis of large-scale flooding in the fractured Spraberry trend area reservoir. J. Petrol. Tech., 11(4): 15 - 19. Barnum, R.S. and Vela, S., 1984. Testing Wells by Objectives. SPE 13184, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 59thAnn. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Houston, TX, 8 pp.
535 Barton, C.C. and Larsen, E., 1985. Fractal geometry of two-dimensional fracture networks at Yucca Mountain, southwestern Nevada. Proc. Intern. Symp. Fundamentals of Rock Joints, Bj6rkliden, Sweden, pp. 77 - 84. Bashore, W.M., Araktingi, U.G., Levy, M. and Schweller, W.J., 1993. The importance of the geological model for reservoir characterization using geostatistical techniques and the impact of subsequent fluid flow. SPE 26474,Form. Eval. and Reserv. Geol., Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. 68th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Houston, TX, pp. 601 - 616. Bebout, D.G., Lucia, F.J., Hocott, C.R., Fogg, G.E. and Vander Stoep, G.W., 1987. Characterization of the Grayburg Reservoir, University Lands Dune Field, Crane County, Texas. Bur. Econ. Geol., Univ. Texas at Austin, Rept. Inv. No. 168, Austin, TX: 98 pp. Beier, R.A., 1990. Pressure transient field data showing fractal reservoir structure. CIM/SPE 90-4, 1990 Intern. Tech. Meet. Petrol. Soc. of Can. Inst. Min. and Soc. Petrol. Eng., Calgary, Can. Beier, R.A. and Hardy, H.H., 1991. Comparison of different horizontal fractal distributions in reservoir simulations. Third Internat. Reservoir Characterization Tech. Conf. Preprints, Vol. 1: Technical Papers, Nat. Inst. Petrol. Energy Res. and U.S. Dept. of Energy, Bartlesville, OK, DOE Conf.-911125, Paper 3 RC- 11: 26 pp. Bell, A.H., Mast, R.F., Oros, M.O., Sherman, C.W. and Van Den Berg, J., 1959. Petroleum Industry in Illinois. Ill. Geol. Survey Bull. 88, Urbana, IL, 127 pp. Beveridge, S.B., Spivak, A. and Bertrand, J-E, 1969. Recovery sensitivities of high-relief reservoirs. J. Canadian Petrol. Tech., 8(3): 9 3 - 98. Beydoun, Z.R., 1988. The Middle East: Regional Geology and Petroleum Resources. Scientific Press, Beaconsfield, Bucks, UK, 292 pp. Black, H.N. and Stubbs, B.A., 1975. A Case History Study-Evaluation of San Andres Stimulation Results. SPE 5649, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 50th Ann. Fall Meeting, Dallas, TX, 16 pp. Blair, EM., 1964. Calculation of oil displacement by countercurrent water imbibition. J. Petrol. Tech., 16(9): 195 - 202. Bosscher, H. and Southham, J., 1992. CARBPLAT: a computer model to simulate the development of carbonate platforms. Geology, 20(1): 235 - 238. Brace, W.F., 1972. Pore pressure in geophysics. In: H.C. Heard, I.Y. Borg, N.L. Carter and C.B. Raleigh (Editors), Flow and Fracture of Rock. Geophysical Monograph No. 16, pp. 265 - 273. Am. Geogr. Union, Washington, DC, 352 pp. Brown, R.J.S. and Gamson, B.W., 1960. Nuclear magnetism logging. Trans. AIME, 2 1 9 : 1 9 9 - 207. Bruce, W.A., 1944. A study of the Smackover Limestone Formation and the reservoir behavior of its oil and condensate pools. Trans. AIME, 155:88 - 119. Buckley, S.E., 1951. Petroleum Conservation. Am. Inst. of Mining and Metallurgical Eng. (AIME), New York, 239 pp. Bulnes, A.C. and Fitting, R.U.Jr., 1945. An introductory discussion of the reservoir performance of limestone formations. Trans. AIME, 160:179 - 201. Chakrabarty, C., Tortike, W.S. and Farouq Ali, S.M., 1993. Complexities in the analysis of pressuretransient response for non-Newtonian power-law fluid flow in fractal reservoirs. SPE 26910, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Eastern Reg. Conf. & Exhib., Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 2 0 3 - 210. Chang, J. and Yortsos, Y.C., 1990. Pressure-transient analysis of fractal reservoirs. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Form. Eval., 5(1): 31 - 38. Chang, M-M. and Pautz, J.F., 1992. Gravity factor corrects horizontal well PI calculation. Oil & Gas J., 90(33): 7 4 - 79. Chang, M-M., Tomutsa, L. and Tham, M.K., 1989. Predicting horizontal/slanted well production by mathematical modeling. SPE 18854, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Prod. Oper. Symp., Oklahoma City, OK, pp. 2 6 9 - 284. Chayes, F., 1956. Petrographic Modal Analysis; An Elementary Statistical Appraisal. Wiley, New York, NY, 118 pp. Chen, H-K., 1993. Performance ofhorizontal wells, Safah Field, Oman. SPE 25568,Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Middle East Oil Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Bahrain, pp. 4 4 5 - 454. Chen, H.C. and Fang, J.H., 1993. A new method for prospect appraisal. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 77(1): 9 - 18. Chen, S., Diemer, K., Doolen, G.D., Eggert, K., Fu, C., Gutman, S. and Travis, B.J., 1991. Lattice gas automata for flow through porous media. Physica D, 47(1/2): 72 - 84.
536 Chilingar, G.V., 1964. Relationship between porosity, permeability, and grain-size distribution of sands and sandstones. In: L.M.J.U. van Straaten (Editor), Deltaic and Shallow Marine Deposits, pp. 71 75. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 464 pp. Chilingar, G.V., Main, R. and Sinnokrot, A., 1963. Relationship among porosity, permeability, and surface area of sediments. J. Sediment. Petrol., 33(3): 759 - 756. Chilingar, G.V., Bissell, H.J. and Wolf, K.H., 1967. Diagenesis of carbonate rocks. In: G. Larsen and G.V. Chilingar (Editors), Diagenesis in Sediments, pp. 1 7 9 - 322. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 551 pp. Chilingarian, G.V., Mazzullo, S.J. and Rieke, H.H., 1992a. Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part I, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 639 pp. Chilingarian, G.V., Mazzullo, S.J. and Rieke, H.H., 1992b. Introduction. In" G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part I, pp. 1 - 58. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 639 pp. Chilingarian, G.V., Torabzadeh, J., Rieke, H.H., Metghalchi, M. and Mazzullo, S.J., 1992c. Interrelationships among surface area, permeability, porosity, pore size, and residual water saturation. In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering analysis, Part I, pp. 3 7 9 - 416. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 639 pp. Choquette, P.W. and Pray, L.C., 1970. Geologic nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 54(1): 207 - 250. Cinco-Ley, H. and Samaniego, F., 1981. Transient pressure analysis for fractured wells..1. Petrol. Tech., 33(9): 1749 - 1766. Cinco-Ley, H., Miller, F.G. and Ramey, H.J.Jr., 1975. Unsteady-state pressure distribution created by a directionally drilled well. J. Petrol. Tech., 27(11): 1392- 1402. Clark, J.B., 1949. A hydraulic process for increasing the productivity of wells. Trans. AIME, 186:1 8.
Clausing, R.G., 1985. Prefiled Testimony. Kansas Corporation Commission Docket No. C-164. Claycomb, E., 1983. Pressure buildup characteristics in Austin Chalk wells. Oil & Gas jr., 81 (9): 71 77. Coats, K.H., Dempsey, J.R. and Henderson, J.H., 1971. The use of vertical equilibrium in two-dimensional simulation of three-dimensional reservoir performance. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 11(1): 63 - 71. Coogan, A.H., 1991. Cambrian oil in eastern Ohio. Origin and migration.Appalachian Pipeline, 2(12): 9-11. Cottrell, T.L., Spronz, W.D. and Weeks, W.C. III, 1988. Hugoton infill program uses optimum stimulation technique. Oil & Gas J., 86(28): 8 8 - 90. Craft, B.C. and Hawkins, M.F., 1959. Applied Petroleum Reservoir Engineering. Prentice-Hall, 9Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 437 pp. Craze, R.C., 1962. Development plan for oil reservoirs. In: T.C. Frick (Editor), Petroleum Production Handbook, Vol. II, Chapter 33. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY. Craze, R.C., 1950. Performance of limestone reservoirs. Trans. AIME, 189: 2 8 7 - 294. Crichlow, H.B., 1977. Modern Reservoir Engineering- A Simulation Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 354 pp. Crow, W.L., 1977. Mini Massive F r a c - A Stimulation Technique for Low-Porosity, Low-Permeability Zones. SPE 6627, Soc. Petrol. Eng. Eastern Reg. Meet., Pittsburgh, PA, 4 pp. Crowe, C.W. and Miller, B.D., 1974. New, Low Viscosity Acid in Oil Emulsions. SPE 5159, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 49th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Houston, TX, 7 pp. Dagan, G., 1979. Models of groundwater flow in statistically homogeneous porous formations. Water Resources Res., 15(1): 47 - 63. Dagan, G., 1984. Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations.,/. Fluid Mech., 145: 151- 177. Dake, L.P., 1978. Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 443 pp. Davidson, D.A. and Snowdon, D.M., 1977. Beaver River Middle Devonian Carbonate: Performance Review of a High Relief Fractured Gas Reservoir with Water Influx. SPE 6830, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 52nd Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Denver, CO, 10 pp. Davis, E.F. and Shepler, J.C., 1969. Reservoir pressure data used to justify infill drilling in a low permeability reservoir. J. Petrol. Tech., 21(3): 2 6 7 - 273. Dees, J.M. and Coulter, G.R., 1986. Fracturing Treatment Quality Control: Results of a Three-Year Study. SPE 15512, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 61st Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., New Orleans, LA, 13 pp. Delhomme, J.P., 1978. Kriging in the hydrosciences. Adv. Water Res., 1(5): 251 - 266.
537 Demko, S., Hodges, L. and Naylor, B., 1985. Constructon of fractal objects with iterated function systems. Comp. Graphics, 19(3): 2 7 1 - 278. Desch, J.B., Larsen, W.K., Lindsay, R.F. and Nettle, R.L., 1984. Enhanced oil recovery by CO 2miscible displacement in the Little Knife Field, Billings County, North Dakota. J. Petrol. Tech., 36(9): 1592 - 1602. Dickey, P.A., 1968. Migration of reservoir fluids: Discussion. J. Petrol. Tech., 20(4): 364. DOE, 1991. Opportunities to Improve Oil Productivity in Unstructured Deltaic Reservoirs. U.S. Dept. of Energy Symp., Jan. 2 9 - 30, Hyatt Regency Dallas-Fort Worth Intemat. Airport, Dallas, TX. Dominguez, G.C., Samaniego V, F. and Chilingarian, G.V., 1992. Simulation of carb6nate reservoirs. In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering analysis, Part I, pp. 543 - 588. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 639 pp. Dowling, P.L., 1970.Application of Carbonate Environmental Concepts to Secondary Recovery Projects. SPE 2987, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 45th Ann. Meet., Houston, TX, 4 pp. Doyle, R.E. and Wurl, T.M., 1971. Stream channel concept applied to waterflood performance calculations for multiwell, multizone, three-component cases. J. Petrol. Tech., 23(3): 373 - 380. Driscoll, V.J., 1974. Recovery Optimization Through Infill Drilling- Concepts, Analysis, and Field Results. SPE 4977, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 46th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Houston, TX, 14 pp. Dubois, D. and Prade, H., 1988. Possibility Theory. Plenum Press, New York, NY, 263 pp. Dunham, R.J., 1962. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. In: W.E. Ham (Editor), Classification of Carbonate Rocks, A Symposium, pp. 1 0 8 - 121. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Spec. Publ. No. 14:209 pp. Dykstra, H. and Parsons, R.L., 1950. The prediction of oil recovery by water flood. In: Secondary Recovery in the U.S.A., Am. Petrol. Inst., pp. 1 6 0 - 174. Ehrlich, R. and Horkowitz, K.O., 1984. A Strong Transfer Function Links Thin-Section Data to Reservoir Physics. SPE 13263, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 59th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib:, Houston, TX, 7 pp. Eijpe, R. and Weber, K.J., 1971. Mini-permeaters for consolidated rock and unconsolidated sand. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 55(2): 307 - 309. Elkins, L.E., 1946. The importance of injected gas as a driving medium in limestone reservoirs as indicated by recent gas-injection experiments and reservoir-performance history. Dril. and Prod. Prac., pp. 160 - 174. Elkins, L.F., 1953. Reservoir performance and well spacing, Spraberry trend area field of west Texas. Trans. AIME, 198:177 - 196. Elkins, L.F. and Slov, A.M., 1963. Cycle waterflooding the Spraberry utilizes 'end effects' to increase oil production rate. Trans. AIME, 228:877 - 884. Elliott, G.R., 1946. Behavior and control of natural water-drive reservoirs. Trans. AIME, 165:201 218. Emanuel, A.S., Alameda, G.K., Behrens, R.A. and Hewett, T.A., 1987. Reservoir performance prediction methods based on fractal geostatistics. SPE 16971, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. 62nd Ann. Fall Meet. and Exhib., Dallas, TX., pp. 405 - 418. Eremenko, N.A., 1968. Geology of Oil and Gas. Izd. Nedra, Moscow, 389 pp. Fanchi, J.R., Kennedy, J.E. and Dauben, D.L., 1987. BOAST II." A Three-Dimensional, Three-Phase Black Oil Applied Simulation Tool. U.S. Dept. of Energy Contract Rept. DOE/BC 88/2/SP, Bartlesville Project Office, Bartlesville, OK, 410 pp. Fang, J.H. and Chen, H.C., 1990. Uncertainties are better handled by fuzzy arithmetic. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 74(8): 1 2 2 8 - 1233. Fassihi, M.R., 1986. New correlations for calculation of vertical coverage and areal sweep efficiency. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Reserv. Eng., 1(6): 6 0 4 - 606. Fatt, I., 1956a. The network model of porous media. I. Capillary pressure characteristics. Trans. AIME, 207: 1 4 4 - 159. Fatt, I., 1956b. The network model of porous media. II. Dynamic properties of a single size tube network. Trans. AIME, 207:160 - 163. Fatt, I., 1956c. The network model of porous media. III. Dynamic properties of networks with tube radius distribution. Trans. AIME, 2 0 7 : 1 6 4 - 181. Fatt, I., 1959. A demonstration of the effect of 'dead-end' volume on pressure transients in porous media. Trans. AIME, 216:449 - 454. Fertl, W.H., Chapman, R.E. and Hotz, R.F., 1994. Abnormal Formation Pressures. Elsevier, Amster-
538 dam, 454 pp. Fetkovich, M.J., Bradley, M.D., Works, A.M. and Thrasher, T.S., 1988. Depletion performance of layered reservoirs without crossflow. SPE 18266, Reserv. Eng. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 63rd Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., New Orleans, LA, pp. 2 9 - 43. Fetkovich, M.J., Effs, D.J.Jr. and Voelker, J.J., 1990a. Development of a multiwell, multilayer model to evaluate infill drilling potential in the Oklahoma Hugoton Field. SPE 20778, Reserv. Eng. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 65th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., New Orleans, LA, pp. 581 - 596. Fetkovich, M.J., Needham, R.B. and McCoy, T.F., 1990b. Analysis of Kansas Hugoton infill drilling: Part I I - 12 year performance history of five replacement wells. SPE 20779,Reserv. Eng. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 65th Ann. Techn Conf. and Exhib., New Orleans, LA, pp. 5 9 7 - 608. Firoozabadi, A. and Katz, D.L., 1979. An analysis of high-velocity gas flow through porous media. J. Petrol. Tech., 31(7): 211 - 2 1 6 . Fisher, W.L. and Galloway, W.E., 1983. Potential for Additional Oil Recovery in Texas. Bur. Econ. Geol., Geol. Circ. 83-2, Univ. Texas, Austin, TX. Folk, R.L., 1959. Practical petrographic classification of limestones. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 43(1): 1 - 38. Freeman, H.A. and Natanson, S.G., 1959. Recovery problems in a fracture-pore system: Kirkuk Field. Proc. Fifth World Petrol. Congr., II: 297 - 317. Galloway, W.E., Ewing, T.E., Garrett, C.M.Jr., Tyler, N., and Bebout, D.G., 1983. Atlas of Major Texas Oil Reservoirs. Bur. Econ. Geol. Spec. Publ., Univ. Texas, Austin, TX., 139 pp. Garaicochea Petrirena, F., Perez-Rosales, C. and Ortiz de Maria, M.J., 1963. An example of an extremely undersaturated and low permeability oil reservoir- San Andres Field, Mexico. Proc. 6th World Petrol. Congr., II: 117 - 128. Garrison, J.R.Jr., Pearn, W.C. and von Rosenberg, D.U., 1991. The fractal nature of geological data sets: Power law processes everywhere! SPE 22842, Prod. Opers. and Eng. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 66th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Dallas, TX, pp. 261 - 272. Garrison, J.R.Jr., Pearn, W.C. and von Rosenberg, D.U., 1992. The fractal Menger sponge and Sierpinski carpet as models for reservoir rock/pore systems: I. Theory and image analysis of Sierpinski carpets. In Situ, 16(4): 351 - 406. Garrison, J.R.Jr., Pearn, W.C. and von Rosenberg, D.U., 1993a. The fractal Menger sponge and Sierpinski carpet as models for reservoir rock/pore systems: II. Image analysis of natural fractal reservoir rocks. In Situ, 17(1): 1 - 53. Garrison, J.R.Jr., Peam, W.C. and von Rosenberg, D.U., 1993b. The fractal Menger sponge and Sierpinski carpet as models for reservoir rock/pore systems: III. Stochastic simulation of natural fractal processes. In Situ, 17(2): 1 4 3 - 182. Garrison, J.R.Jr., Pearn, W.C. and von Rosenberg, D.U., 1993c. The fractal Menger sponge and Sierpinski carpet as models for reservoir rock/pore systems: IV. Relationship of fractal dimension to the measured permeability of natural fractal reservoir rocks. In Situ, 17(3): 331 - 362. Gewers, C.W.W. and Nichol, L.R., 1969. Gas turbulence factor in a microvugular carbonate. J. Can. Pet. Tech., 8(2): 5 2 - 56. Ghauri, W.K., 1980. Production technology experience in a large carbonate waterflood, Denver Unit, Wasson San Andres field. J. Pet. Tech., 32(9): 1493- 1502. Ghauri, W.K., Osborne, A.F. and Magnuson, W.L., 1974. Changing concepts in carbonate waterflooding - west Texas Denver Unit project - An illustrative example. J. Petrol. Tech., 26(6): 595 - 606. Giger, F.M., 1983a. R6duction du nombre de puits par l'utilisation de forages horizontaux. Revue de l'Institut Franr du P~trole, 38(3): 351 - 360. Giger, F.M., 1983b. Evaluation th6orique de l'effet d'ar6te d'eau sur la production par puits horizontaux. Revue de l 'Institut Franr du P~trole, 38(3): 361 - 370. Gleeson, J.W., Woessner, D.E. and Jordan, C.F. Jr., 1993. NMR imaging of pore structures in limestones. Soc. Petrol. Form. Eval., 8(2): 1 2 3 - 127. Goggin, D.J., Thrasher, R. and Lake, L.W., 1988. A theoretical and experimental analysis of minipermeameter response including gas slippage and high velocity flow effects. In Situ, 12(1/2): 7 9 - 116. Goodknight, R.C., Klikoff, W.A. and Fatt, I., 1960. Non-steady state flow and diffusion in porous media containing dead-end pore volume. J. Phys. Chem., 64(9): 1162- 1168. Gould, T.L. and Sarem, A.M.S., 1989. Infill drilling for incremental recovery. J. Petrol. Tech., 41(3):
539 229-237. Graham, J.W. and Richardson, J.G., 1959. Theory and application of imbibition phenomena in recovery ofoil. J. Petrol. Tech., 11(2): 6 5 - 6 9 . Grant, C.W., Goggin, D.J. and Harris, P.M., 1994. Outcrop analog for cyclic-shelf reservoirs, San Andres Formation of Permian Basin: Stratigraphic framework, permeability distribution, geostatistics, and fluid-flow modeling. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 78(1): 23 - 54. Gray, T.A., Chork, C.Y. and Taggart, I.J., 1993. Pitfalls in the fractal analysis of reservoir property data. SPE 25421, Form. Eval. and Reserv. Geol. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 68th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Houston, TX, pp. 4 5 - 60. Grebe, J.J. and Stosser, S.M., 1935. Increasing crude production 20,000,000 barrels from established fields. World Petrol., 6(8): 4 7 3 - 4 8 2 . Groves, D.L. and Abernathy, B.F., 1968. Early Analysis of Fractured Reservoirs Compared to Later Performance. SPE 2259, Soc. Petrol. Eng. Ann. Fall Meeting, Houston, TX, 12 pp. Gussow, W.C., 1968. Migration of reservoir fluids. J. Petrol. Tech., 20(4): 353 - 363. Gussow, W.C., 1954. Differential entrapment of oil and gas: a fundamental principle. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 38(5): 816 - 853. Hadley, G.F. and Handy, L.L., 1956. A Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Steady State Capillary End Effect. SPE 707-G, Soc. Petrol. Eng. Ann. Fall Meeting, Los Angeles, CA. Hagoort, J., 1980. Oil recovery by gravity drainage. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 20(3): 1 3 9 - 150. Haldorsen, H.H. and Chang, D.M., 1986. Notes on stochastic shales; From outcrop to simulation model. In: L.W. Lake and H.B. Carroll Jr. (Editors), Reservoir Characterization, pp. 445 - 4 8 6 . Academic Press, New York, NY, 659 pp. Haldorsen, H.H. and Damsleth, E., 1993. Challenges in reservoir characterization. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 77(4): 5 4 1 - 551. Haldorsen, H.H. and Lake, L.W., 1984. A new approach to shale management in field scale simulation models. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 24(4): 4 4 7 - 4 5 7 . Halsey, T.C., Jensen, M.H., Kadanoff, L.P., Procaccia, I. and Shraiman, B.I., 1986. Fractal measures and their singularities: The characterization of strange sets. Physical Rev. A, 33(2): 1141 - 1151. Hamon, G., 1988. Oil/water gravity drainage mechanisms in oil-wet fractured reservoirs. SPE 18366, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. European Petrol. Conf., London, pp. 283 - 292. Hansen, J.P., McCauley, J.L., Muller, J. and Skjeltorp, A.T., 1988. Multifractal analysis of sedimentary rocks. In: H.E. Stanley and N. Ostrowsky (Editors), Random Fluctuations and Pattern Growth: Experiments and Models, p. 310. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 355 pp. Hardy, H.H., 1991. Fractal analysis of core photographs with application to reservoir characterization. 3rd lnternat. Reserv. Characterization Tech. Conf. Preprints, Vol. 1: Technical Papers, National Inst. Petrol. Energy Research and U.S. Dept. of Energy, Bartlesville, OK, DOE Conf.-911125, Paper 3RC-13:10 pp. Heaviside, J. and Salt, H.J., 1988. A systematic approach: The key to successful core analysis. SPE 18385, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. European Petrol. Conf., London, pp. 463 - 4 7 3 . Hendrickson, A.R., Thomas, R.L. and Economides, M.J., 1992. Stimulation of carbonate reservoirs. In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part I, pp. 5 8 9 - 625. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 639 pp. Hentschel, H.G.E. and Procaccia, I., 1983. The infinite number of generalized dimensions of fractals and strange attractors. Physica D, 8: 4 3 5 - 444. Hewett, T.A., 1986. Fractal distributions of reservoir heterogeneity and their influence on fluid transport. SPE, 15386, Reserv. Eng. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 61st Ann. Fall Meet. and Exhib., New Orleans, LA, pp. 6 7 - 82. Hewett, T.A. and Behrens, R.A., 1990. Conditional simulation of reservoir heterogeneity with fractals. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Formation Eval. J., 5(3): 2 1 7 - 225. Hewett, T.A. and Behrens, R.A., 1991. Scaling laws in reservoir simulation and their use in a hybrid finite difference/streamtube approach to simulating the effects of permeability heterogeneity. In: L.W. Lake, H.B. Carroll Jr. and T.C. Wesson (Editors). Reservoir Characterization II, pp. 4 0 2 - 4 4 1 . Academic Press, New York, NY, 726 pp. Hewett, T.A. and Behrens, R.A., 1993. Considerations affecting the scaling of displacements in heterogeneous permeability distributions. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Formation Eval. 8(4): 258 - 266. Hicks P.J.Jr., Deans, H.A. and Narayanan, K.R., 1992. Distribution of residual oil in heterogeneous
540 carbonate cores using X-ray CT. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Form. Eval., 7(3): 235 - 240. Hnatiuk, J. and Martinelli, J.W., 1967. The relationship of the Westerose D-3 pool to other pools on the common aquifer. J. Can. Petrol. Technol., 6: 4 3 - 49. Hohn, M.E., 1988. Geostatistics and Petroleum Geology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 264 pp. Holditch, S.A., Jennings, J.W. and Neuse, S.H., 1978. The Optimization of Well Spacing and Fracture Length in Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs. SPE 7496, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 53rd Ann. Meet. and Exhib., Houston, TX, 11 pp. Holtz, M.H., Ruppel, S.C. and Hocott, C.R., 1992. Integrated geologic and engineering determination of oil-reserve-growth potential in carbonate reservoirs. J. Petrol. Tech., 44(11): 1250 - 1257. Honarpour, M.M., Koederitz, L.F. and Harvey, A.H., 1986. Relative Permeability of Petroleum Reservoirs. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 143 pp. Honarpour, M.M., Schatzinger, R.A., Szpakiewicz, M.J., Jackson, S.R., Sharma, B., Tomutsa L. and Chang, M.M., 1990. Integrated Methodology for Constructing a Quantified Hydrodynamic Model for Application to Clastic Petroleum Reservoirs. Nat. Inst. Petrol. Energy Res. Rept. NIPER-439: 156 pp. Hoover, R.S. and Adams, R.L., 1988. Advances in fracturing techniques in carbonate reservoirs in the Howard Glasscock Field in west Texas. SPE 17282, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conf., Midland, TX, pp. 165- 178. Horsefield, R., 1962. Performance of the Leduc D-3 reservoir, with supplement. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Trans. Reprint Series No. 4, pp. 6 5 - 72. Horstmann, L.E., 1977. Giddings Field. In: G.K. Burns (Editor), Typical Oil and Gas Fields of Southeast Texas Vol II, pp. 235 - 241. Houston Geol. Soc., Houston, TX, 243 pp. Howard, G.C. and Fast, C.R., 1970. Hydraulic Fracturing. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Momograph 2, Dallas, TX, 210 pp. Hurst, H.E., 1957. A suggested statistical model of some time series which occur in nature. Nature, 180: 494. Hurst, R.E., 1961. Acidize or fracture? - An engineered approach for Permian Basin Reservoirs. Proc. 8th Ann. West Texas Oil Lifting Short Course, Texas Tech. College, Lubbock, TX, pp. 1 5 2 - 156. Hurst, W., 1982. Odd shaped field analyzed by conformal mapping. Oil & Gas J., 80(44): 6 8 - 70. ICF, 1992. A Review of Shallow-Shelf Carbonate Reservoirs in the United States. U.S. Dept. of Energy Contract Rept. DE-AC22-91BC14839, Metairie Site Office, New Orleans, LA. ICF and BEG, 1988. Producing Unrecovered Mobile Oil: Evaluation of Potential Economically Recoverable Reserves in Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico. Rept. for DOE Office of Fossil Energy and Bartlesville Project Office, ICF-Lewin Energy Div., Fairfax, Virginia and Bur. Econ. Geology, Univ. Texas, Austin, TX, 151 pp. ICF and BEG, 1990a. Production Potential of Unrecovered Mobile Oil Through Infield Development: Integrated Geologic and Engineering Studies - Overview. U.S. Dept of Energy Contract No. AC2286BC 14000, Bartlesville Project Office, Bartlesville, OK, 115 pp. ICF and BEG, 1990b. An Assessment of the Reserve Growth Potential of the San Andres/Grayburg Carbonate (South Central Basin Platform) Play in Texas. U.S. Dept of Energy Contract No. AC2286BC 14000-4, Bartlesville Project Office, Bartlesville, OK, 78 pp. ICF and BEG, 1990c. An Assessment of the Reserve Growth Potential of the Frio Barrier-Strandplain Play in Texas. U.S. Dept of Energy Contract No. AC22-86BC14000, Bartlesville Project Office, Bartlesville, OK, 73 pp. ICF and BEG, 1990d. An Assessment of the Reserve Growth Potential of the Clear Fork Platform Carbonate Play in Texas. U.S. Dept of Energy Contract No.AC22-86BC 14000-5, Bartlesville Project Office, Bartlesville, OK, 147 pp. ICF and BEG, 1990e. Producing Unrecovered Mobile Oil: Evaluation of the Potential Economically Recoverable Reserves in Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico. U.S. Dept of Energy Contract No. AC22-86BC 14000-2, Bartlesville Project Office, Bartlesville, OK, 77 pp. Ijjasz-Vasquez, E.J., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. and Bras, R.L., 1992. On the multifractal characterization of river basins. In: J.D. Phillips and W.H. Renwick (Editors), Geomorphic Systems. Geomorphology, 5: 2 9 7 - 310. Ikwuakor, K.C., 1992. Use of rock-typing to characterize carbonate reservoir heterogeneity. Enhanced Oil Rec., Prog. Rev. No. 66, U.S. Dept. of Energy, pp. 5 2 - 58. IOCC, 1990. Geological Classification of Domestic Light Oil Reservoirs. Preliminary Rept. for U.S.
541 Dept. of Energy, Bartesville Project Office, Bartlesville, OK, 85 pp. Jardine, D.J., Andrews, D.P., Wilshart, J.W. and Young, J.W., 1977. Distribution and continuity of carbonate reservoirs. J. Petrol. Tech., 29: 8 7 3 - 885. Jardine, D. and Wilshart, J.W., 1987. Carbonate reservoir description. In: R.W. Tillman and K.J. Weber (Editors), Reservoir Sedimentology, pp. 1 2 9 - 152. Soc. Econ. Paleontologists and Mineralogists Sp. Publ. No. 40:357 pp. Jasti, J.K., Jesion, G. and Feldkamp, L., 1993. Microscopic imaging of porous media with X-ray computer tomography. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Form. Eval., 8(3): 1 8 9 - 193. Jodry, R.L., 1992. Pore geometry of carbonate rocks and capillary pressure curves (basic geologic concepts). In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part I, pp. 331 - 377. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 639 pp. Jones, S.C., 1994. A new, fast, accurate pressure-decay probe permeameter. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Form. Eval., 9(3): 1 9 3 - 199. Jones-Parra, J. and Reytor, R.S., 1959. Effect of gas-oil rates on the behavior of fractured limestone reservoirs. Trans. AIME, 216: 3 9 5 - 397. Johnson, C.E. and Sweeney, S.A., 1971. Quantitative Measurement of Flow Heterogeneity in Laboratory Core Samples and Its Effect on Fluid Flow Characteristics. SPE 3610, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 46th Ann. Fall Meet., New Orleans, LA, 12 pp. Joshi, S.D., 1988a. Augmentation of well productivity using slant and horizontal wells. J. Petrol. Tech., 40(6): 7 2 9 - 739. Joshi, S.D., 1988b. Production forecasting methods for horizontal wells. SPE 17580, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Internat. Meet., Tianjin, China, pp. 303 - 321. Journel, A.G. and Huijbregts, C.J., 1978. Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, New York, NY, 600 pp. Kadanoff, L.P., 1966. Scaling laws for Ising models near T c. Physics, 2(6): 263 - 272. Katz, A.J. and Thompson, A.H., 1985. Fractal sandstone pores: Implications for conductivity and pore formation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 54(12): 1325 - 1328. Katz, D.L., 1959. Handbook of Natural Gas Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, 802 pp. Kaye, B.H., 1989. A Random Walk Through Fractal Dimensions. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weiheim, Germany, 421 pp. Kellan, D.K. and Pugh, V.J., 1973. Trapped Gas Saturations in Carbonate Formations. SPE 4535, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 48th Ann. Meet., Las Vegas, NV, 18 pp. Kent, D.M., 1987. Modelling carbonate reservoir porosity for enhanced recovery schemes. J. Can. Petrol. Technol., 26(4): 53 - 59. King, ER., 1989. The use of renormalization for calculating effective permeability. Transp. in Porous Media, 4:37 - 58. King, ER., Muggeridge, A.H. and Price, W.G., 1993. Renormalization calculations of immiscible flow. Transp. in Porous Media, 12: 2 3 7 - 260. Kittridge, M.G., Lake, L.W., Lucia, F.J. and Fogg, G.E., 1990. Outcrop/subsurface comparisons of heterogeneity in the San Andres Formation. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Formation Eval., 5(3): 233 - 240. Klinkenberg, B., 1994. A review of methods used to determine the fractal dimension of linear features. Math. Geol., 26(1): 23 - 46. Klute, C.H., 1959. Diffusion of small molecules in semicrystalline polymers. II. The permeability of unoriented polymer films. J. Polymer Sci., 41:307 - 317. Koen, A.D., 1992. Horizontal drilling retains steady share of U.S. activity. Oil & Gas J., 90(32): 1 2 16. Korvin, G., 1992. Fractal Models in the Earth Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 395 pp. Kozic, H.G., Holditch, S.A. and Kumar, A., 1980. Massive Hydraulic Fracture Test, Cotton Valley Lime, East Texas. U.S. Dept. of Energy Contract Rept. DOE/ET/12150-1, Mitchell Energy Corporation, The Woodlands, TX, 64 pp. Kozic, H.G., Holditch, S.A. and Kumar, A., 1980. A case history for massive hydraulic fracturing the Cotton Valley lime matrix, Fallon and Personville fields. J. Petrol. Tech., 33(2): 2 2 9 - 244. Krohn, C.E., 1988a. Sandstone fractal and Euclidean pore volume distributions. J. Geophys. Res., 93(B4): 3 2 8 6 - 3296. Krohn, C.E., 1988b. Fractal measurements of sandstones, shales, and carbonates. J. Geophys. Res.,
542 93(B4): 3 2 9 7 - 3305. Kuchuk, EJ., Goode, P.A., Brice, B.W. and Sherrad, D.W., 1988. Pressure transient analysis and inflow performance for horizontal wells. SPE 18300, Proc. Petrol. Engrs. 63rd Ann. Fall Meet., Houston, TX, pp. 3 8 3 - 398. Kuich, N., 1990. Seismic and horizontal drilling unlock Austin Chalk. Worm Oil, 211(3): 4 7 - 54. Lake, L.W. and Carroll, H.B.Jr. (Editors), 1986. Reservoir Characterization. Academic Press, New York, NY, 659 pp. Lake, L.W., Johnston, J.R. and Stegemeier, G.L., 1981. Simulation and performance prediction of a large-scale surfactant/polymer project. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 21(6): 731 - 739. Langnes, G.L., Rieke, H.H. III, Mannon, R.W. and Chilingar, G.V., 1972. Summary of pool characteristics and primary performance data for selected carbonate reservoirs. In: G.V. Chilingar, R.W. Mannon and H.H. Rieke III (Editors), Oil and Gas Production from Carbonate Rocks, pp. 365 - 388. Elsevier, New York, 408 pp. Langnes, G.L., Robertson, J.O.Jr. and Chilingar, G.V., 1972. Secondary Recovery and Carbonate Reservoirs. Elsevier, New York, 304 pp. Laughlin, B.A., Jardon, M.A. and Wu, C.H., 1987. Infill drilling economic analysis of carbonate oil reservoirs in west Texas. SPE 16854, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. 62nd Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Dallas, TX, pp. 187 - 201. Larsen, L. and Hovdan, M., 1987. Analyzing well test data from linear reservoirs by conventional methods. SPE 16777,Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. 62ndAnn. Tech. Conf. andExhib., Dallas, TX, pp. 373 -383. Lee, J.E., Niven, R.G., Cochrane, J.T.H. and Richardson, J.G., 1974. The Effect of Rate on Recovery for Canadian Carbonate Reservoirs. SPE 5128, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 49th Ann. Fall Meet., Houston, TX, 16 pp. Lemaitre, R. and Adler, P.M., 1990. Fractal porous media IV: Three-dimensional Stokes flow through random media and regular fractals. Transp. in Porous Media, 5:325 - 340. Levorsen, A.I., 1967. Geology of Petroleum, 2nd ed. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 573 pp. Lichtenberger, G.J., 1990. Pressure buildup test results from horizontal wells in the Pearsall Field of the Austin Chalk. SPE 20609, Form. Eval. and Reserv. Geol. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 65th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., New Orleans, LA, pp. 835 - 850. Lindsay, R.F. and Kendall, C.G.St.C., 1985. Depositional facies, diagenesis, and reservoir character of Mississippian cyclic carbonates in the Mission Canyon Formation, Little Knife Field, Williston Basin, North Dakota. In: P.O. Roehl and P.W. Choquette (Editors), Carbonate Petroleum Reservoirs, pp. 1 7 5 - 190. Springer Verlag, New York, NY, 622 pp. Longman, M.W., Fertal, T.G. and Stell, J.R., 1992. Reservoir performance in Ordovician Red River Formation, Horse Creek and South Horse Creek fields, Bowman County, North Dakota. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 76(4): 4 4 9 - 4 6 7 . Lord, C.S., 1971. Comparison of calculated with experimental imbibition relative permeability. Soc. Petrol. Eng. or., 11(4): 419 - 425. Lyle, D., 1993. Horizontal Madison drilling waits for right trigger in North Dakota. Western 0 & G World, 50(10): 32. MacAllister, D.J., Miller, K.C., Graham, S.K. and Yang, C-T., 1993. Application of x-ray CT scanning to determine gas/water relative permeabilities. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Form. Eval., 8(3): 1 8 4 - 188. Macovski, A., 1983. Medical Imaging Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, MJ, 256 pp. Mancini, E.A. and Benson, D.J., 1981. Smackover carbonate petroleum geology in southwest Alabama. Oil & Gas J., 79(52): 2 6 6 - 275. Mancini, E.A., Mink, R.M., Tew, B.H., Kopaska-Merkel, D.C. and Mann, S.D., 1991. Variability in Carbonate Reservoir Heterogeneity Among Jurassic Smackover Oil Plays of Southwest Alabama. Third Internat. Reserv. Characterization Tech. Conf., Natl. Petrol. Energy Res. and U.S. Dept. of Energy, Bartlesville, OK, DOE CONF.-911125. Preprints, Vol. II, Paper 3RC-52:13 pp. Mandelbrot, B.B., 1975. Stochastic models for the earth's relief, the shape and the fractal dimension of the coastlines, and the number-area rule for islands. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 72:3825 - 3828. Mandelbrot, B.B., 1982. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, San Francisco, 460 pp. Mandelbrot, B.B., 1988. An introduction to multifractal distribution functions. In: H.E. Stanley and N. Ostrowsky (Editors), Random Fluctuations and Pattern Growth: Experiments and Models, pp. 279 291, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 355 pp. -
543 Mandelbrot, B.B. and Van Ness, J.W., 1968. Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SlAM Rev., 10(4): 422 - 437. Mandelbrot, B.B. and Wallis, J.R., 1968. Noah, Joseph, and operational hydrology. Water Resources Res., 4(5): 909 - 918. Mandelbrot, B.B. and Wallis, J.R., 1969a. Computer experiments with fractional Gaussian noises. Part 2, rescaled ranges and spectra. Water Resources Res., 5(1): 242 - 259. Mandelbrot, B.B. and Wallis, J.R., 1969b. Some long-run properties of geophysical records. Water Resources Res., 5(2): 321 - 340. Mannon, R.W., 1972. Estimation of oil and gas reserves and the production forecast in carbonate reservoirs. In: G.V. Chilingar, R.W. Mannon and H.H. Rieke III (Editors), Oil and Gas Production from Carbonate Rocks, pp. 2 1 6 - 254. Elsevier, New York, 408 pp. Martin, J.C. and Wegner, R.E., 1979. Numerical solution of multiphase, two-dimensional incompressible flow using stream-tube relationships. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 19(5): 313 - 323. Mazzullo, S.J. and Chilingarian, G.V., 1992a. Diagenesis and origin of porosity. In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part I, pp. 1 9 9 - 270. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 639 pp. Mazzullo, S.J. and Chilingarian, G.V., 1992b. Depositional models of carbonate reservoirs. In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part I, pp. 1 0 9 - 198. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 639 pp. Mazzullo, S.J., Chilingarian, G.V. and Bissell, H.J., 1992. Carbonate rock classifications. In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part I, pp. 5 9 - 108. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 639 pp. McCauley, J.L., 1990. Introduction to multifractals in dynamic systems theory and fully developed fluid turbulence. Phys. Rep., 189(5): 225 - 266. McCauley, J.L., 1992. Models of permeability and conductivity of porous media. Physica A, 1 8 7 : 1 8 - 54. McCoy, T.F., Fetkovich, R.B., Needham, R.B. and Reese, D.E., 1990. Analysis of Kansas Hugoton infill drilling: Part I - total field results. SPE 20756, Proc. Reserv. Eng. Soc. Petrol. Eng., New Orleans, LA, pp. 403 - 415. McCoy, T.F., Reese, D.E., Fetkovich, R.B., Needham, R.B. and Freeman, B.F., 1994. Infill wells contradict claims of new gas in huge Hugoton field. Oil & Gas J., 92(17): 5 6 - 61. McGuire, W.J. and Sikora, V.J., 1960. The effect of vertical fractures on well productivity. Trans. AIME, 219:401 - 403. Meister, J.J., 1978. A porous, permeable carbonate for use in oil recovery experiments. J. Petrol. Tech., 30(11): 1 6 3 2 - 1634. Meneveau, C. and Sreenivasan, K.R., 1987. Simple multifractal cascade model for fully developed turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59(13): 1424- 1427. Meneveau, C. and Sreenivasan, K.R., 1989. Measurement of f(a) from scaling of histograms and applications to dynamic systems and fully developed turbulence. Phys. Lett. A, 137: 1 0 3 - 112. Mesa, O.J. and Poveda, G., 1993. The Hurst effect: The scale of fluctuation approach. Water Resources Res., 29(12): 3995 - 4002. Miller, R.T. and Roger, W.L., 1973. Performance of Oil Wells in Bottom Water Drive Reservoirs. SPE 4633, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 48th Ann. Meet., Las Vegas, NV, 24 pp. Moore, A.D., 1952. Mapping techniques applied to fluid mapper patterns. Proc. Am. Inst. Elect. Eng., 71:1 Mohanty, K.K. and Miller, A.E., 1991. Factors influencing unsteady relative permeability of a mixedwet reservoir rock. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Form. Eval., 6(3): 3 4 9 - 358. Mohanty, S. and Sharma, M.M., 1990. A recursive method for estimating single and multiphase permeabilities. SPE 20477, Proc. Form. Eval. Soc. Petrol Eng. 65th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., New Orleans, LA, pp. 1 2 7 - 136. Morineau, Y., Simandoux, P. and Dupuy, M., 1965. Etude des h6t6rog6n6it6s de p6rm6abiliti6s dans les milieux poreux. Compte Rendu du II~me Colloque de l 'Association de Recherche sur les Techniques de Forage et de Production, Rueil, France, 4:273 - 299. Morse, R.A. and Von Gonten, W.D., 1972. Productivity of vertically fractured wells prior to stabilized flow. J. Petrol. Tech., 24(7): 807 - 811. Morris, E.E. and Tracy, G.W., 1965. Determination of the Pore Volume in a Naturally Fractured Reservoir SPE 1185, Soc. Petrol. Eng., Ann. Fall Meeting, Denver, CO, 8 pp.
544 Mortada, M. and Nabor, G.W., 1961. An approximate method for determining areal sweep efficiency and flow capacity in formations with anisotropic permeability. Trans. AIME, 222(11): 2 7 7 - 286. Muller, J., 1992. Multifractal characterization of petrophysical data. Physica A, 191: 284 - 288. Muller, J., Bokn, I. and McCauley, J.L., 1992. Multifractal analysis of petrophysical data. Ann. Geophysicae, 10: 7 3 5 - 740. Muskat, M., 1949.Physical Principles of Oil Production. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 4 1 7 - 4 2 1 . Nuckols, E.B., 1992. Oil Research Program Shallow Shelf Carbonate Reservoirs Class II. Briefing Doc., U.S. Dept. of Energy, Metairie Site Office, New Orleans, LA (Oct.). Nuckols, E.B., 1993. Personal communication, Nov. Orsi, T.H., Edwards, C.M. and Anderson, A.L., 1994. X-ray computed tomography: A nondestructive method for quantitative analysis of sediment cores. J. Sediment. Res., A64(3): 690 - 693. Parsley, A.J., 1986. North Sea hydrocarbon plays. In: K.W. Glennie (Editor), Introduction to the Petroleum Geology of the North Sea, pp. 2 3 7 - 263. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 278 pp. Parsons, R.W. and Chaney, P.R., 1966. Imbibition model studies on water-wet carbonate rocks. Trans. AIME, 237(1I): 2 6 - 34. Pathak, P., Davis, H.T. and Scriven, L.E., 1982. Dependence on Residual Nonwetting Liquid Saturation on Pore Topology. SPE 11016, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 57th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., New Orleans, LA, 20 pp. Perez, G. and Chopra, A.K., 1991. Evaluation of fractal models to describe reservoir heterogeneity and performance. SPE 22694, Form. Eval. and Reserv. Geol. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 66th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Dallas, TX, pp. 3 8 7 - 398. Petzet, G.A., 1990. U.S. Operators expand horizontal programs. Oil & Gas J., 88(43): 3 6 - 37. Pocovi, A.S., Gustavino, Lic.L., Pozzo, A. and Musmarra, J.A., 1991. Comparing cost and performance of horizontal wells. World Oil, 212(3): 3 9 - 4 4 . Poston, S.W., Chen, H.Y. and Aly, A., 1991. Using production decline type curves to characterize vertical and horizontal Austin Chalk wells. Third Internat. Reserv. Characterization Tech. Conf. Preprints, 1Iol. 1: Technical Papers, Nat. Inst. Petrol. Energy Res. and U.S. Dept. of Energy, Bartlesville, OK, DOE Conf.-911125, Paper 3RC-74, 18 pp. Pickell, J.J., Swanson, B.F. and Hickman, W.B., 1966. The application of air-mercury and oil-air capillary pressure data in the study of pore structure and fluid distribution. AIME Trans., 237: 5 5 - 61. Pirson, S.J., 1953. Performance of fractured reservoirs. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 37(2): 232 244. Pucci, J.C., 1987. A review of Argentina's sedimentary basins. Oil & Gas J., 85(22): 52 - 55. Ray, R.M., 1991. Overview of the Federal Oil Research Program Implementation Plan. Briefing Doc., U.S. Dept. of Energy, Bartlesville Project Office, Bartlesville, OK (Jan. 27): 39 pp. Reeckmann, A. and Friedman, G.M., 1982. Exploration for Carbonate Petroleum Reservoirs. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 213 pp. Reitzel, G.A. and Callow, G.O., 1977. Pool description and performance analysis leads to understanding Golden Spike's miscible flood. J. Petrol. Tech., 29:867 - 872. Rieke, H.H., III and Chilingarian, G.V., 1974. Compaction of Argillaceous Sediments. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 424 pp. Rieke, H.H. and Perry, R.D., 1983. Exploration and Development Quality Control Manual. Internal Rept., POI Energy, Cleveland, OH, 80 pp. Rieke, H.H. and Perry, R.D., 1985. A microcomputer-based oil and gas consultant system. SPE 14496, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Eastern Reg. Conf., Morgantown, WV, pp. 5 5 - 63. Rieke, H.H. III, Mannon, R.W., Chilingar, G.V. and Langnes, G.L., 1972. Classification and performance of carbonate reservoirs. In: G.V. Chilingar, R.W. Mannon and H.H. Rieke III (Editors), Oil and Gas Production from Carbonate Rocks, pp. 255 - 308. Elsevier, New York, 408 pp. Roberts, J.N., 1986. Comment about fractal sandstone pores. Phys. Rev. Letters., 56(19): 2111. Robinson, J.E. 1982, Computer Applications in Petroleum Geology. Hutchinson Ross, New York, NY, 164 pp. Rose, W., 1957. Studies of Waterflood Performance III-Use of Network Models. I11. State Geol. Surv., Circ. 237, 31 pp. Rosman, A. and Simon, R., 1976. Flow heterogeneity in reservoir rocks. J. Petrol. Tech., 28(12): 1427 1429. Russ, J.C., 1990. Computer-Assisted Microscopy: The Measurement and Analysis of Images. Plenum -
-
545 Press, New York, NY, 453 pp. Ruzyla, K., 1984. Characterization of Pore Space by Quantitative Image Analysis. SPE 13133, Soc. Petrol. Eng. 59th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., Houston, TX, 13 pp. Sadiq, S., 1965. The Inertial Resistance Coefficient and Other Reservoir Rock Properties. MS Thesis, Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Samaniego, F., Cinco Ley, H. and Dominguez, G.C., 1992. Fluid flow through carbonate rock systems. In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part I, pp. 4 3 9 - 503. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 639 pp. Saraf, D.N., 1981. Methods of In-Situ Saturation Determination During Core Tests Involving Multiphase Flow. Petroleum Recovery Inst. Rept. 1981 - 6 . Saucier, A., 1992. Effective permeability of multifractal porous media. Physica A, 183:381 - 397. Schlager, W., 1992. Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy of Reefs and Carbonate Platforms. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Continuing Education Course Note Series No. 34:71 pp. Sen, EN., Scala, C. and Cohen, M.H., 1981. A self-similar model for sedimentary rocks with application to the dielectric content of fluid glass beads. Geophysics, 46(5): 781 - 795. Senger, R.K., Lucia, F.J., Kerans, C. and Ferris, M.A., 1991. Dominant control on reservoir-flow behavior in carbonate reservoirs as determined from outcrop studies. Third Internat. Reservoir Characterization Tech. Conf. Preprints, Vol. 1: Technical Papers, National Inst. Petrol. Energy Research and U.S. Dept. of Energy, Bartlesville, OK, DOE Conf.-911125, Paper 3RC-58:44 pp. Serra, J., 1982. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Academic Press, New York, NY, 610 pp. Sessions, R.E., 1963. Small propane slug proving success in Slaughter Field lease. J. Petrol. Tech., 15(1): 3 1 - 3 6 . Schilthius, R.J., 1936. Active oil and reservoir energy. Trans. AIME, 118: 3 3 - 52. Shirley, K., 1990. Austin Chalk play still raises eyebrows. Am. Assoc. Petrol Geol. Explorer, 11 (11): 1 --2.
Sheikholeslami, B.A., Schlottman, B.W., Seidel, F.A. and Button, D.M., 1991. Drilling and production aspects of horizontal wells in the Austin Chalk. J. Petrol. Tech., 43(7): 773 - 779. Siemens, W.T. and Ahr, W.H., 1990. Reservoir facies, pore characteristics, and flow u n i t s - Lower Permian, Chase Group, Guymon-Hugoton Field, Oklahoma. SPE 20757, Reserv. Eng. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 65th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., New Orleans, LA, pp. 4 1 7 - 428. Skovbro, B., 1983. Depositional conditions during chalk sedimentation in the Ekofisk area Norwegian North Sea. In: J.P.H. Kaasscheiter and T.J.A. Reijers (Editors), Petroleum Geology of the Southeastern North Sea and the Adjacent Onshore Areas, Geol. Mijnbouw, 62(1): 1 6 9 - 175. Slobod, R.L. and Caudle, B.H., 1952. X-ray shadowgraph studies of areal sweep efficiencies. Trans. AIME, 195:265 - 270. Sorenson, R.E, White, F.W. and Clark, C.N., 1987, Hunton and Sycamore reservoirs in Golden Trend Field, Garvin County, Oklahoma. Bull. Assoc. Am. Petrol. Geologists, 71(8): 997. Standing, M., 1969. Personal communication (Nov. 25). Stapp, W.L., 1977. Comments on the geology of the fractured Austin and Buda formations in the subsurface of south Texas. Bull. South Texas Geol. Soc., 1 7 : 1 3 - 4 7 . Stewart, C.R., Craig, F.F.Jr. and Morse, R.A., 1953. Performance characteristics by model flow tests. Trans. AIME, 198:93 - 102. Stewart, C.R., Craig, F.F.Jr., Schneider, F.N., Geffen, T.M. and Berry, V.J.Jr., 1954. The rate of bubble formation in oil recovery by solution gas drives in limestones. Trans. AIME, 201: 2 9 4 - 301. Teodorovich, G.I., 1943. Structure of pore spaces of carbonate oil reservoir rocks and their permeability, as illustrated by Paleozoic reservoirs of Bashkiriya. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 39(6): 231 - 234. Teodorovich, G.I., 1949. Carbonate Facies, Lower Permian- Upper Carboniferous of Ural-Volga Region. Izd. Moskov. Obshch. Ispyt. Prirody, Moscow, Issue 13(17): 304 pp. Teodorovich, G.I., 1958. Study of Sedimentary Rocks. Gostoptekhizdat, Leningrad, 572 pp. Timur, A., 1972. Nuclear magnetic resonance study of carbonate rocks. Log Analyst, XIII(5): 3 - 11. Tinsley, J.M., Williams, J.R.Jr., Tiner, R.L. and Malone, W.T., 1969. Vertical fracture h e i g h t - its effect on steady-state production increase. J. Petrol. Tech., 21(5): 6 3 3 - 639. Tomutsa, L., Doughty, D., Brinkmeyer, A. and Mahmood, S., 1992. Imaging Techniques Applied to the Study of Fluids in Porous Media. National Inst. Petrol. and Energy Res. (NIPER) Topical Rept. 582, IIT Res. Instit., Bartlesville, OK, 22 pp. Torrey, ED., 1940. Progress in squeeze cementing application and technique. Oil Weekly, 98(8): 6 8 - 84.
546 Torrey, ED., 1961. Evaluation of secondary recovery prospects. Economics of Petroleum Exploration, Development and Property Evaluation, Paper No. 9. Southwest Legal Foundation, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Tremblay, A.-M.S. and Tremblay, R.R., 1992. How many correlation lengths for multifractals? Physica A, 183: 398-410. Turcotte, D.L., 1992. Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY, 221 pp. Tyler, N., Galloway, W.E., Garrett, C.M.Jr., and Ewing, T.E., 1984. Oil accumulation, production characteristics, and targets for additional recovery in major oil reservoirs of Texas. Bur. Econ. Geol., Geolog. Circ. 8 4 - 2, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX, 31 pp. Ulmishek, G. and Harrison, W., 1984. Quantitative methods for assessment of petroleum resources of poorly known basins. In: C.D. Masters (Editor), Petroleum Resource Assessment, pp. 8 0 - 94. Internat. Union Geol. Sci., Publ. No. 17, Ottawa, Canada, 157 pp. Van Der Vlis, A.C., Duns, H. and Luque, R.F., 1979. Increasing well productivity in tight chalk reservoir. Proc. lOth World Petroleum Congress, Bucharest, Romania, 3:71 - 78. Van Kruyskijk, C.P.J.W. and Niko, H., 1988. Alternatives for draining tight naturally fractured gas reservoirs: Horizontal hole drilling vs. massive hydraulic fracturing. SPE 18339, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Eur. Petrol. Conf., London, England, pp. 4 7 - 57. Velde, B., Dubois, J., Moore, D. and Touchard, G., 1991. Fractal patterns of fractures in granites. Earth and Planetary Sci. Letters, 104(1): 25 - 35. Vinegar, H.J., 1986. X-ray CT and NMR imaging of rocks. J. Petrol. Tech., 38(3): 2 5 7 - 259. Vinegar, H.J. and Wellington, S.L., 1987. Tomographic imaging of three-phase flow experiments. Rev. Sci. Instrum., (1): 9 6 - 107. Vinegar, H.J., Tutunjian, P.N., Crabtree, P.T., Raffaldi, F.J., DiFoggio, R. and Edelstein, W.A., 1991. NMR spectroscopy of tight gypsum-bearing carbonates. Log Analyst, 32(5): 5 2 7 - 535. Voss, R.F., 1988. Fractals in nature: From characterization to simulation. In: H-O. Peitgen and D. Saupe (Editors), The Science of Fractal Images, pp. 21 - 70, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 312 pp. Warren, J.E. and Price, H.S., 1961. Flow in heterogeneous porous media. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 1(3): 1 5 3 - 169. Warren, J.E. and Root, P.J., 1963. The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. Trans. AIME, 228: 245-255. Wattenbarger, R.C., Aziz, K. and Orr, F.M., 1991. Optimal scales for representing reservoir heterogeneity. Third Internat. Reservoir Characterization Conf. Preprints, Vol. 1: Technical Papers, Nat. Inst. Petrol. Energy Res. and U.S. Dept. of Energy, Bartlesville, OK, DOE Conf.-911125, Paper 3RC-85:31 pp. Wayhan, D.A. and McCaleb, J.A., 1969. Elk Basin Madison heterogeneity- its influence on performance. J. Petrol. Tech., 21(2): 153- 159. Weber, K.J., 1982. Delineation of the Reservoir by Identification of Environmental Types and Early Estimation of Reserves. U.N. Internat. Meet. Oilfield Devel. Techniques, Daqing, China, 55 pp. Wellington, S.L. and Vinegar, H.J., 1987. X-ray computerized tomography. J. Petrol. Tech., 39(8): 885 -889. White, D.A., 1980. Assessing oil and gas plays in facies-cycle wedges. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 64(8): 1158- 1178. Withjack, E.M., 1988. Computed tomography for rock-property determination and fluid-flow visualization. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Form. Eval., 3(4): 6 9 6 - 704. de Witte, L., 1972. Formation evaluation. In: G.V. Chilingar, R.W. Mannon and H.H. Rieke III (Editors), Oil and Gas Production from Carbonate Rocks, pp. 143 - 215. Elsevier, New York, NY, 408 PP. Wong, P-Z., Koplik, J. and Tomanic, J.P., 1984. Conductivity and permeability of rocks. Physical Rev. B, 30(11): 6606 - 6614. Worthington, P.F., 1991. Reservoir characterization at the mesoscopic scale. In: L.W. Lake, H. B. Carroll Jr. and T.C. Wession (Editors), Reservoir Characterization II, pp. 1 2 3 - 165. Academic Press, New York, NY, 726 pp. Wright, V.P., 1984. Peritidal carbonate facies models: A review. Geol. J., 19(4): 309 - 325. Wu, C.H., Flores, D.P., Briens, F.J.L., Brimhall, R.M. and Poston, S.W., 1989. An evaluation of waterflood infill drilling in west Texas Clearfork and SanAndres carbonate Reservoirs. SPE 19783,
547 Reserv. Eng. Proc., Soc. Petrol. Eng. 64th Ann. Tech. Conf. and Exhib., San Antonio, TX, pp. 121 136. Wu, C.H., Laughlin, B.A. and Jardon, M., 1988. Impact of infill drilling on waterflood recovery: West Texas carbonate reservoirs. SPE 17286, Proc. Soc. Petrol. Eng. Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conf., Midland, TX, pp. 185 - 204. Wyllie, M.R.J. and Rose, W., 1950. Some theoretical considerations related to the quantitative evaluation of the physical characteristics of reservoir rocks from electric logs. Trans. AIME, 189:105 118. Young, G.R., 1989. Determining permeability anisotropy from a core plug using a minipermeameter. M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Texas. Yuan, L-P. and Strobl, R., 1991. Variograms and reservoir continuity. Third Internat. Reservoir Characterization Tech. Conf. Preprints, Vol. 1: Technical Papers, Nat. Inst. Petrol. Energy Res. and U.S. Dept. of Energy, Bartlesville, OK, DOE Conf.-911125, Paper 3RC-17:16 pp. Yuster, S.T. and Calhoun, J.C.Jr., 1945a. Pressure parting of formations in water flood operationsPart I. Oil Weekly, 117(2): 3 8 - 4 2 . Yuster, S.T. and Calhoun, J.C.Jr., 1945b. Pressure parting of formations in water flood operationsPart II. Oil Weekly, 117(3): 3 4 - 4 8 . Zwanziger, J.E., 1978. Provincias Mesozoicas productoras en el noreste de Mexico.Ingenieria Petrolera, XVIII(3): 3 5 - 4 0 .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr. H. Rieke would like to thank the following people for assistance in preparing Chapters 1 and 5. Thanks go out to Mr. Nawaz Ahmed (Sialkor, Pakistan) for his continuing encouragement and help; Mr. M. Waseem Saleem (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia) for his help in many of the necessary odd jobs in putting manuscripts together; Mr. Abdul H. Afandi and his staff at the Directorate General of Mineral Resources in Jeddah for some of the drafting and Pat Vavrock for the rest; Mrs. Claudia Moe (West Virginia University Librarian, Morgantown, WV) and Mr. George J. Vranas (Director) of USGS Library in Jeddah for their assistance in searching and obtaining publications; Mr. Khalid M. Hajraf (Director) and his staff at the DGMR Publications Department in Jeddah for their support; Professor Kinji Magara (U.A.E. University, A1-Ain), and Drs. Assadullah Kazi and Leif Carlson at the DGMR for their advice and support. To Mr. E.B. Nuckols (Texas A & M University at Corpus Christi, Texas) and Mr. William Gwilliam (Department of Energy, Morgantown, WV) for reading and commenting on the manuscript. Lastly, to his son Henry Rieke for maintaining the computers, typing, and preparing electronically some of the large tables and figures.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
549 Chapter 6
W E L L TEST ANALYSIS IN CARBONATE RESERVOIRS FERNANDO SAMANIEGO V. and HEBER CINCO LEY
INTRODUCTION
Forecasting reservoir performance requires, among other parameters, complete information on reservoir definition and rock and fluid properties. A reliable method for estimation of both rock properties and characterization of some reservoir heterogeneities, when using an integrated approach, is pressure transient testing. Over the last four decades, several hundred technical papers have been written on well test analysis; this material includes solutions for transient flow problems, methods of analysis, and practical aspects of testing procedures. This wealth of information is a result of the increasing interest among engineers in the determination of reservoir characteristics under in situ conditions, which is the essential objective of pressure transient analysis. An excellent treatment of different techniques currently available has been presented by Matthews and Russell (1967), Ramey, Kumar and Gulati (1973), Energy Resources Conservation Board (1975), Earlougher (1977), Home (1990), Stanislav and Kabir (1990) and Sabet (1991). Analysis of pressure transient data allows estimation of the following information (symbols and units are defined in the Nomenclature section at the end of this chapter): - formation conductivity (kh), well damage (s), - average formation pressure (p-), - formation storage capacity (O~c h), - parameters of double porosity 'behavior (w, ~, r/maO,AIo, Smao), -- hydraulic fracture parameters (klbl) o, k l b p x I, and s I, and detection of: - barriers and discontinuities, - layering, water drive conditions, permeability anisotropy, and interference between wells and reservoirs. -
-
-
-
Although this list is not complete, it highlights the most important information that can be acquired through this analysis. Experience on the application of pressure transient methods of interpretation has shown that, in some cases, the uniqueness dilemma arises especially when dealing with heterogeneous systems. In other words, it is implied that different reservoir situations yield the same pressure behavior. However, the uniqueness dilemma can, in many cases, be solved through an integrated approach, that is, a combination of pressure transient data and geological and geophysical information, well logging, pro-
550
q vs t
)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
( Pw vs t
PRESSURE RECORDER INTERPRETATI ON MODELS -------~-
DAMAGED ZONE
( RESERVOIR
WELL CONDITIONS
Fig. 6-1. Interpretation of a transient pressure test. duction data, core analysis, etc. Figure 6-1 shows a schematic of this approach where it is indicated that analysis of all information available provides the interpretation model(s), which defines well conditions and formation characteristics that are used as an input into reservoir simulation studies. A transient pressure test consists of recording the variation of pressure vs. time after a change of well flow rate. The pressure response can be measured either at the well where the change of flow rate takes place, in a single well test, or at nearby wells in a multiple well test. Table 6-I presents the most frequently used tests in the oil industry. Transient pressure tests have been successfully performed in all kinds of formations, but usually a special effort has to be made in applications to carbonate reservoirs due to their inherently more heterogeneous nature as compared to sandstones (Dominguez et al., 1992; Samaniego et al., 1992). Information on transient pressure analysis is vast, and would require many volumes to present a complete discussion of different aspects. This, indeed, is not the objective of the present chapter. Rather, the aim of this chapter is to discuss specific aspects of well test analysis as applied to carbonate reservoirs. First, the basic theory of transient flow in reservoirs is introduced, followed by a detailed discussion on the most commonly used techniques of interpretation. A special effort is made to present applied examples whenever possible.
551 T A B L E 6-I P r e s s u r e t r a n s i e n t a n d f l o w tests
TABLE
6.I
Pressure
transient
and flow RATE
TYPE SINGLE WELL TESTS
PRESSURE
qt,
1. Pressure Drowdown
(PBV)
l
qz
q
q' I
=.._
v t
to : t E
Pwf I
I q'
to
t~
~
4. I n j e c t i o n Test
v t
tz
w -q
=,..-
t
L~t
v t
o
J
tl tz ts
9
I
-q
-q
t4 ~ t
I
o il
to
o
tl
~---t Pwf ~t
Pwf
i
qT,,
i to
o
,
7. Deliverability Test
tz
t3
t4 "-t
-t -
" - t
Pw
~
w t
l
v t Pw Ii
qz q'
10. Repeat Formation Test (RFT) ,
=,.._
to
~---t
Drillstem Testing (DST)
i
t=
Pw
6. Constant Pressure Test
9.
l
tl
v t
Pwf
Testing
i
to
-q
q~176
5. Fall Off Test
--t
to:tp
=.=
8. Vertical
v t
to
ow , , . . f ~
;
3. Variable Flow Rate Test
=,=
v t
to
2. Pressure Buildup
tests
|
!
'~.~
tl
tz
to
I to -q
tl
Pw
11. Step Rate Test
~
"~ t
s
= .r~";-'F-
I
tz
tz
i
o
t~
t~
T
Active Well
t4
v t
,k ; i ~ I .= o -t~ -tz -ts -t4 v _ t & P || Observation Well .._
12. Interference Test
r JL
,
v t
Active Well q q q
to
v
t
p ,L Observation Wells
13. Pulse Testing "-t
v t
552 P R E S S U R E T R A N S I E N T B E H A V I O R OF R E S E R V O I R S
Analysis of pressure and flow test information has been performed since its introduction in the petroleum industry, by matching data to reservoir flow models. Such matching has been possible through the use of graphical and computer historymatching techniques. Undoubtedly, complete knowledge of the characteristics and limitations of flow models allows correct application of the methods of analysis, resulting in high level of confidence in the estimation of reservoir parameters. Traditionally, the cylindrical radial flow model has been used as a basis for pressure transient interpretation. This practice is based on the fact that, in general, flow towards a well follows this geometry. However, there are some cases where this flow geometry is not appropriate, and the analyst must apply other types of flow models such as linear, spherical radial, elliptical and bilinear. In the foregoing discussion a brief presentation is made of the main features and limitations of these flow models. Classical pressure transient analysis theory assumes a system with the following characteristics: the permeability (k) and the porosity (~b) of the medium are constant, the porous medium is homogeneous and isotropic, the fluid saturating the medium has constant viscosity (/~) and a small compressibility (c), - the flow is isothermal and Darcy's Law is valid, pressure gradients are small everywhere within the porous medium, and - gravity forces are negligible. Under these conditions, flow phenomenum in a porous medium can be described by the diffusivity equation: -
-
-
-
V2p -
k
9
(6-1)
where p and t represent pressure and time, respectively. Particular solutions of Eq. 61 require definition of specific boundary and initial conditions. The usual initial conditions consider a uniform pressure distribution throughout the medium, that is,
p(t = O) = pi for all domains
(6-2)
The boundary conditions are defined for both the inner and outer boundaries. The inner boundary represents the surface through which fluid is either produced or injected (i.e., the well). The outer boundary is the surface limiting extemally the porous medium saturated by hydrocarbons (i.e., sealing faults, pinch outs, oil-water and gas-water contacts, etc.). Generally, two types of conditions are considered along the boundary: a) prescribed flux, and b) prescribed pressure. The first case is expressed using Darcy's law:
! 9 ds On
qp k
(6-3)
553 where s represents the boundary surface; n, the direction normal to the surface; and q, the total flow rate produced (injected) through this surface. This condition includes the impermeable boundary case, that is q = 0. The second case is expressed as:
p(t) Is = Po
(6-4)
where Po is the prescribed pressure at the boundary. Sometimes, the flow problem is solved for a porous medium of infinite extent, and the boundary condition at the outer boundary is:
lim p(s,t)
S----~oo
(6-5)
= Pi
such that pressure never changes at the extemal boundary (infinity). In order to generalize the solution for different flow problems in reservoirs, dimensionless variables have been introduced (van Everdingen and Hurst, 1949; Ramey et al., 1973; Earlougher et al., 1977). The definition of dimensionless groups varies according to the geometry of flow as shown in Table 6-II. A characteristic of these TABLE 6-11 Dimensionless variables Flow geometry
Variable
Symbol
Liquid
Definition Gas
Linear
Distance
xo
x /L
x / L
~,kt
Radial
Spherical
12 ctZ2
~,kt ~) (12 ct)iL2
Time
tD
~
Pressure drop
POE
kbh(p i - p ) aoLB lzL
kbh(p ) - (Pp(Pwi) ) aoLB IuL
Distance
ro
r / rw
r / rw
Time
tD
flt k t ~ p c, r2w
qb (12 ct) i
Pressure drop
PD
kh ( P i -- P ) aoqB p
kh (pp (p i) - lap(Pw/) ) ag qsc T
Distance
ro
r / rw
r / rw
~,kt
~,kt
Time
to
~) ]lJ C t r 2
(~ (p c ) i r~
Pressure drop
k rw(Pi--p) aosph q B p
k rw(Pp(Pi)-Pp(Pw]))
PDsph
flt k t r~
tXgsphqsc T
The definitions of dimensionless variables for these cases include the variable, which represents the length of the medium for finite systems and has any arbitrary value for infinite systems. Although in practice a medium of infinite extent does not exist, every finite system behaves as infinite for times before boundary and or interference effects are present.
554
11111" ' I 1
b.,// f"
X=O
/A I "
//
, I
X
I I-r__/
"
1 h X
Fig. 6-2. Linear flow.
groups is that the dimensionless variables are directly proportional to the real parameters and appear naturally in the derivation of solutions.
L I N E A R F L O W BEHAVIOR
Many flow tests in reservoirs exhibit linear flow behavior; that is the case of some naturally-fractured reservoirs and hydraulically fractured wells. Figure 6-2 shows the system for a linear flow geometry. A porous medium of thickness h and width b is considered. The outer boundary of the medium can be either located at a finite or an infinite distance, depending on the case under study. The inner boundary is located at x = 0,where the medium is produced at either constant pressure or constant rate conditions. All other characteristics of the medium are those defined for Eq. 6-1. The solutions for all possible combinations of boundary conditions are summarized in Table 6-Ill. Both small and large time approximations are included, because they appear to be the basis of some methods of interpretation. Next, we discuss the main pressure and flow rate characteristics for the constant flow rate. Similar expressions could be written for constant pressure cases. Figure 6-3 shows the pressure distribution for this inner boundary condition. At an early time in flow both the closed and the constant pressure flow behavior period are sometimes referred to as infinite acting or "transient" period. The pressure behavior in dimensionless form for these particular conditions, and x D ~ O, is presented in Fig. 6-4 in terms of the groups PD / xD and tDL/ XD" 2 This figure shows a single curve and appears to be useful in the analysis of interference tests when linear flow prevails in the reservoir. It can be observed in Fig. 6-4 that as time increases the pressure-drop curve asymptotically approaches a one-half straight line. At the producing well, the dimensionless pressure change from Table 6-II1 for liquid flow may be expressed in terms of real variables as follows: Ap = moL ~
where the slope moL is defined by:
(6-6)
TABLE 6-Ili
Linear flow equations for homogeneous reservoirs
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN.NER OUTER
GENERALEQUATION
Infinite
Flow Rate
Reservoir
x o =0 "Pot
=2~'~
(l-xo) 2
1
co, (xo.to,) - ---T-F
!
I
i
Closed
LARGE TIME APPROXIMATION
tDL < 0 . 2 5
e ca~ ) - x o erfc (--~t~)
PoL (xo 'toL) = 2
Comtant
SMALL TIME APPROXIMATION
2 ~
6 + to, + - ~
e(-.'. 'to,)
.=
(1 - xo)2
,,
Pt~ (xo,toz)
-
2
1 + 6 t~
9
Same as infinite reservoir
• cos (n x x o )
N I
1
'
T E
x o=O'poL
2
~ e-(n'f~ toL)
I
1 x o = 0 " POL = tOL + - ~
=t~+~'+
R
E S E R V O
8 ~-, ( - / ) " P D, (x~,to, ) = ( 1 - xo ) - _-:7Z ~ - ~ n - - : , 2 ff
.=o
Pressure
i R S
xe
~
XD =O'PoL
8 =1--77"
.I
(%-+'3
sin
~
Comtant
Infinite
Pressure
Reservoir R I E FS
I x o = 0 9qoL =
* After Miller (1962),
~r ( l -
Same as infinite reservoir t DL > 2.5
x o)
x D =0
"PoL =1
xo =0
9q z ~
x o =0
"qoL =1
n2
1 ~toL _ n~r z tot
Closed
x D = 0 " q z~ = 2
I E
R S
POt. ( X o 'tOL) = 1 -- X o
+1)
~** e-(nzx ~ tD,/~r nodd
NR IV TO El
(d
Constant
e Same as infinite reservoir
nodd
co~
Pressure
x o = 0 " q~
= 1+ 2
e -'~'" t~ n=l
** After Nabor and Barham (1964),
+ After Carslaw'a~l Jaeger (1959)
Same as infinite reservoir
(x~ttu = 2 e - ---7-)
t~
556
T
X-0
X=L
f InitialPressure to=0 (D ::D oO (.f)
C3_
~t~
F
. - - - - - t pss
(o)
l
to
f
Initiel Pressure I
II
I
I
::D cr~ c/') (D
(3_
.....__
(b) Fig. 6-3. Pressure distribution for a linear system producing at constant flow rate: (a) closed outer boundary, (b) constant pressure outer boundary.
557
m~ =
2aoL qB / fl, p bh ~/ ~-~-~C t
(6-7)
where aoL and fit are unit conversion constants. According to Eq. 6-6 a graph of Ap vs. x/Tyields a straight line through the origin, as shown in Fig. 6-5. This type of graph is commonly referred to as a "linear flow graph ", "square root of time graph" or a "Millheim and Cichowicz's graph ". The linear flow graph is appropriate for wells with highly conductive fractures and, in some cases, for wells in naturally-fractured reservoirs.
RADIAL C Y L I N D R I C A L FLOW
The traditional model used most often to interpret well tests has been that based on the flow towards a well in a reservoir bounded by upper and lower impermeable layers, representing radial cylindrical flow (Fig. 6-6). The cylindrical coordinates (r, 0, z)are appropriate to study the flow process in this case, because the flow lines follow the direction of one of the system coordinates (r). The solutions for all possible combinations of boundary conditions are summarized in Table 6-IV. Both small and large time approximations are included, because they are fundamental to the methods of interpretation. Table 6-II includes the definitions of dimensionless groups for this case of cylindrical radial flow. The pressure behavior in an infinite reservoir corresponding to a well producing at a constant rate can be obtained by solving Eq. 6-1, written for radial flow, with initial and boundary conditions given previously by Eqs. 6-2, 6-3, and 6-5. However, this solution is not simple enough to be used in well test analysis. Thus, an approximation that yields a simple equation has been preferred: the line source solution. This flow problem will be discussed in detail in the Pressure Drawdown Analysis section of this chapter.
SPHERICAL FLOW BEHAVIOR
There are field conditions where spherical radial flow takes place in the producing formation, among them being: (a) a well only partially penetrating a thick formation, (b) a reservoir with water drive from the flanks and from the bottom, (c) a Repeat Formation Test, etc. The system under consideration is a reservoir with a sphere (or a semi-sphere for case (a) above, producing at the top of the formation) as the inner boundary, through which fluid is produced as indicated in Fig. 6-7. For conditions of spherical radial flow, the dimensionless wellbore pressure change for transient flow, presented in Table 6-V for liquid flow, may be expressed in terms of real variables as:
a o,ph qB APwl = k r where:
m o,ph t~
(6-8)
558
r~ X
1/2 r~
c3n o _J
/ /
/
2
Log ( t DL / XD ) Fig. 6-4. Dimensionless pressure behavior for constant-rate production in an infinite-acting linear reservoir.
Q.
G.) tO t-.
Ibgt) gt)
~D
t3_
mol 1
Square Root of T i m e , ~ Fig. 6-5. Linear flow graph.
559
q
I
I
J
f
h k, 9b,,tz , ct
-I.
Fig. 6-6. Radial flow.
_ ao~ph q B ( r ct) 1/2 ([z.~/ k) 3/2 m
osph
(7~flt) 1/2
(6-9)
Equation 6-8 indicates that pressure drop Apw p vs. the inverse of the square root of time is a straight line, as shown in Fig. 6-8. The slope of the straight line in this figure, given by Eq. 6-9, is inversely proportional to k 2/~.
BILINEAR FLOW BEHAVIOR
Hydraulically-fractured wells exhibit several types of flow. Among them is bilinear flow (Cinco Ley and Samaniego, 1981), where expansion occurs in the formation, generating a linear flow toward the fracture and feeding another linear flow which takes place inside the fracture (Fig. 6-9). In this case, flow inside the fracture can be considered as incompressible because the fracture volume is very small. The fracture has a half length ~.
L~
TABLE 6-IV Radial flow equations for homogeneous reservoirs BOUNDARY CONDITIONS INNER OUTER Con.Ctant
Infinite
Flow Rate
Reservoir
GENERAL EQUATION
SMALL TIME APPROXIMATION
2 f | ( 1 - e-U2t~ ) [ J , ( u ) Y ( u % ) - Y , ( u ) J o (uro)ldu Po (ro 'to ) = ~r J-~ u' [ J : (u)+ ri' (u)l 1
ro > 20 " p o ( r o , t o ) = ~ E ,
LARGE TIME APPROXIMATION
(to/r ~) >25
r~
(~o) po(rv,to)='~[ln
+0.809071
toa < 0.1 P o (ro,t D) =
~
% - 1
(to +
)
toA > 0.1
72"-
(% - 1)
Closed
(3r~
-4r;
2 +r~)_4_ r;2o lnr o Po(ro,to) = r~ _----~(to (r,2o _ l)
In r o - 2 r 2 - 1)
4(r:o - 1) 2 (3r~
+~r'~-" e-'''~
[d:(fl"
ro)Jt(fl.)Y(fl
~ ro)-(fl.)do(fl.ro)] 2
-4r:v in
Same as infinite reservoir
r o -
2r~
4(r:o - 1) 2
:.H:(:.r~)-J,(p.)] ro=l
tDa
2 "0 e -ant~d ( ~ ) p o ( t o ) = l n ro __.T.~": o r o .=, ; ~ J : ( 2 . r o)
Same as infinite reservoir
<
0.1
toa > 0.1
Constant Pressure
Constant
Infinite
Pressure
Reservoir
rD=l
ro=1, t o > 8 x I O '
Vo(x)
2 qo (to) = In t o + 0.80907
4t~ f| x -x't~ / 2 + tan ( - ~ - ~ ) l d x P o ( t o ) = ---l;- o o ro=l R E I
PD ( t o ) = lnr, o
toA < O.I
ro = l, tin> 0.1 21 t m e-CZ",,~ )
Closed
FS I E NR I V i TO E I
Conmma
R S
Pressure
rfo-I qo(to) = --~-
|
e-("~to)dt(a ro )
Same as infufite reservo~
2 ~ a2[d2~ (a ) - d: ( a r o ) ]
qo (to) = ln r o - 3 / 4
toA < 0.1
ro = l, toA > 0.1
Same as infinite reservoir
1 qo - In r,o
+ After Jacob and Lohman (1952), ++ After Ehlig-Economides ~ d R a n ~ (1981), * After van Everdingen and H u m (1949), ** After Ramey (1967)
- 1)
561
Fig. 6-7. Spherical flow.
~P
1
Fig. 6-8. Pressure drop vs. 1 / ~t-for spherical flow pressure data.
562 k,
-Xf
I I 111 I I l II
~
,
].t.,
Ct
111 I I Ill Ix'
3_ bf
Fig. 6-9. Bilinear flow in a reservoir.
In terms of real variables, the pressure drop ApwI can be expressed as follows:
APw! = mobs t 1/4
(6-10)
where mob/ =
8~/qB~ h(k/b/1'/2 (~)~UCtk)'/2
(6-11)
From Eq. 6-10 one can conclude that a graph of the pressure drop Apw I vs. t 1/4 yields a straight line that goes through the origin, as indicated in Fig. 6-10. The slope of this straight line, mob: given by Eq. 6-10, is inversely proportional to the square root of the fracture conductivity [(kibl)S/2 ].
bP ]
V~ Fig. 6-10. Graph for bilinear flow pressure data.
563 FLOW DIAGNOSIS
Experience has shown that during the analysis of a test, it is always possible to draw a straight line through some data points in a specific graph of interpretation (e.g., APwi vs. f/2; APwsvs. t1/4;APwlvs. log t; APwlvs. t, etc.), and this straight line may not be correct for the flow model under consideration. Such a situation makes it necessary to discem the type of flow that dominates a test before using a specific graph of analysis. Thus, it is essential to have a flow regime identification process for the correct interpretation of a pressure test. Next, a discussion introducing the concepts needed to carry out this process is presented. The term "type curve" (Ramey, 1970), refers to a log-log graph of a specific solution to the flow equation (e.g., the diffusivity equation). These solutions are plotted in terms of two groups, one involving the dimensionless pressure for the vertical axis and the other involving the dimensionless time for the horizontal axis. Most type curves are a family of pressure drawdown solutions. Type curve matching techniques offer the advantage that data can still be analyzed even if the drawdown test is too short for the semilog straight line to develop. The general type curve matching method applies to many kinds of well tests for any specific physical fluid flow problem, with known dimensionless solution in terms of po vs. to. Among the tests where currently type curve matching techniques are being successfully used are drawdown, buildup, interference, and constant pressure testing. The general type curve matching method has been thoroughly discussed elsewhere (Earlougher, 1977; Gringarten et al., 1979; Lee, 1982; Bourdet et al., 1983) and will not be discussed in this chapter. The first type curve presented in the petroleum engineering literature was that of Ramey (1970), and was generated for the situation of a constant rate drawdown test in a reservoir containing a slightly compressible single-phase liquid; wherein the well produces at a constant flow rate q, in an infinite, isotropic, homogeneous, horizontal reservoir. The porous medium has a permeability k, porosity ~b, thickness h, and uniform initial pressure pi. If one or more of these assumptions does not correspond to a specific physical situation, then the type curve interpretation is not expected to render useful results. The log-log graph of Ap w f vs " t has been used to detect wellbore storage effects, linear and bilinear flow, etc. However, when an incorrect value of initial pressure is used, this graph can not be used for flow diagnosis. The same problem also exists when skin damage influences linear and bilinear flow (Cinco Ley and Samaniego, 1977, 1981). The introduction to the petroleum industry in the early 1980s of the pressure derivative with respect to time (Tiab and Kumar, 1980a, b; Bourdet et al., 1983) solved the above-mentioned problem. It has been stated that this function offers several advantages over the previous log-log Ap vs. t method already mentioned: (a) It accentuates the pressure response, allowing the analyst to observe true reservoir response (which is somewhat hidden in the response). It facilitates, among other things, the identification and interpretation of reservoir heterogeneities, which are often not readily identifiable through existing methods. (b) It displays in a single graph, different separate characteristics that would
0%
Infinite Acting
Infinite Acting
Miller-Dyes- Hutchinson plot 4000
I
Stg & Skn Homogeneous Inf Actng One Q ,
100
I
-I
o I c~
t.D Q_
0
,
I
I
I
I
k 87.67 c IxlO-4 s 9.194
-C3 C)_
3 800
I
10
v
(D
"- 3600
c0
t.f) t/') (1.)
C3
13_
3400[-
3 200
I
m 204.8 k 87.67 s
IxlO-z
9.194
I 0.1
I
I
1
10
Time,
hrs
~,
O.l 100
0.1
!
I
I
1
1
10
100
1000
I lxlO 4
1 lx105 lx106
tD/C D
Fig. 6-11. Infinite-acting radial flow shows as semilog straight line on a semilog graph, and as a flat region on a derivative graph. (After Home, 1990, fig. 3.2, p. 45.)
565 otherwise require several plots. These characteristics are shown in Figs. 6-11 through 6-18, which are discussed further later in this section. It has been shown that for wellbore storage-dominated flow conditions, the dimensionless wellbore pressure behavior can be expressed as (Ramey, 1970): Po = to / Co
(6-12)
Deriving this expression with respect to tD/ CD, and multiplying by tD/ C D gives:
to /
t~
-~P'D-Co
(6-13)
Taking logarithms:
tog
(6-14)
Equation 6-14 clearly indicates that for wellbore storage conditions, a graph of the pressure derivative function (to/PD) P'o vs. to / Co retains the unit slope on the log-log graph. In terms of real variables, it can be demonstrated based upon the previous discussion that, for wellbore storage-dominated pressure data, a log-log graph of the pressure difference and of the pressure derivative function vs. time exhibit a common unit slope straight line (Fig. 6-9). In case of an error in the value of the initial pressure, the Ap curve will approach the unit slope straight line from above or from below, depending on the sign of the error in Pi" From Eq. 6-12, for the conditions just described:
APwI= C~wst + APerror
(6-15)
Taking the pressure derivative function of this expression gives:
t dApw/ dt
= C~wst
(6-16)
Thus, the effect of the APerror disappears in the pressure derivative function, yielding the correct unit slope straight line in a log-log graph. For infinite-acting radial flow, the dimensionless wellbore pressure behavior can be written (Table 6-IV) as follows: 1
Po = --~-[ln(tz~ / Co) + 0.80907 + In Co eZq
(6-17)
This semilog approximation is valid only after the wellbore storage effect is negligible. Deriving this equation with respect to tD/ CD, and rearranging, one gets:
Storage
Storage
Stg & Skn Homogeneous Inf Actng One O
Log - log plot IxlO 4
I
'
C 5.129xlO-Z
1 /
!
100
'"
I
I
I
k 87.67 c 5xlO -2
--/,et ee~ee
_
I
~ 0
_
~
lO00 .m O0 Q_
4.727x I0 I1
9 tm
10
v c" (3
O
a
a.
l O0
1
(D
rn
10
|
,
,
I
,
1 x 10 -z
I
1 SHUT-IN
TIME ,At,HR
0.1
I
100
,,
0.1
I
I
!
f
]0
,
1000 tD/C
1 x 104
D
Fig. 6-12. Storage shows as a unit straight-line on a log-log graph, and as a unit slope line plus a hump on a derivative graph. (After Home, 1990, fig. 3.3, p. 45.)
Finite Cond Frac
Finite Cond Frac Stg & Skn Homogeneous [nf Actng One Q
Finite Conductivity Froc 10
u
I
|
100
=
I
k 20.04 Xf 197.3
I
!
t
k 20.04 c O.1025 s 9.194 A
1
10
PD v "t3 r
0.1
d:3
1
-
Q.
oeo .~ 1~10 -4
,
I lx10 -2
,
I
i
1
,.
I 100
tDXf
0.1
i 1x
104
o ~
0.1
ooo~o ~ 1 7 6 I
I
I
!
1
10
100
1000
lxlO4
tD/CD
Fig. 6-13. A finite conductivity fracture shows a 1/4 slope line on a log-log graph, and the same on a derivative graph. (After Home, 1990, fig. 3.4, p. 46.)
O~ OO
lnl'lnlte t.;ona I-rac
I n f i n i t e Cond Frac
Stg 8t Skn Homogeneous Inf Act.ng One Q
L o g - log plot lxlO4
100 Xf
I
I
I
I
k 20.04 c 0.1025
192.2
s
r
9.194
10
1000 .m CO Q.
1.)
c~ 13 .=.
100
c~
==
o[
lx10"z
1 -
oi~l~ ~ o O~
*** , ~ l I
I
I
0.1
1
10
SHUT-IN TIME, At,HRS
~176 ,,
0.1 100
O. 1
1
I
,
10
I
I
100
1000
lxlO4
tD/C D
Fig. 6-14. An infinite conductivity fracture shows a 1/2 slope line on a log-log graph, and the same on a derivative graph. (After Home, 1990, fig. 3.5, p. 46.)
Double Porosity T e s t
Double Porosity Test
Mi Iler- Dyes-Hutchinson plot 950
....
I
....
t
Stg & Skn DP StdySt [nf Actng One Q
\
940
100
'|
-
I
{3.
10 -
to
I
I
I
k 497.1 c I x10-3 s -2.055 w O.1051 1SS 8.94x10 -I~
I
I
L~
145.4 .........
_~.~ax~**~x-
-
m~ 930 Xl
to to
E
t__
O..
920 - -
k rn s w 1
910
I xlO - 3
o
49Z 1 10.18 -2.055 0.1051 8.94.x10-tO I 0.1
I 1
1
:
0.1 10
100
1000
L
0.1
1
,
1
10
,
,,
i
t
100
1000
_
~
I
1 xlO 4
lxlO 5
, , ~
lxlO 6
T i m e , hrs tD/Co Fig. 6-15. Double-porosity behavior shows as two parallel semilog straight lines on a semilog graph, and as a minimum on a i:lerivative graph. (After Home, 1990, fig. 3.6, p. 46.)
%tl
L~
C Iosed Boundary Cartesian plot 7000
I
'
I
I
Closed Boundary Stg & Skn Homogeneous Clsd Crcl One Q 100 '
I
I
k c s Re
6000Ea.
!
i
I
87.67 1.427x 10-z 9.194 400.7
1.54gx1011
oloa I0 o~ 5 0 0 0
c~
v
~3
C 0
O
m 4000
1
n SO00
!
2ooo1 0
,
i
,
,
5
I0
15
20
T i m e , hrs
0.1 25
!
0.1
1
,
I
10
,
I
100
,
I
1000
1x104
t D/CD
Fig. 6-16. A closed outer boundary (pseudosteady state) shows as a straight line on a cartesian graph, and as a steep-rising straight line on a derivative graph. (After Home, 1990, fig. 3.7, p. 47.)
Foult B o u n d a r y Stg & Skn Homogeneous Clsd Fit One Q
Fault Boundary Miller - Dyes- Hutchinson plot
70ooI
I
I
m k s L
6OOO1-
100
I
I
J
204.8 87.67 9.194 301.1
I
I
I
I
k 87.67 c 1.427x10-z s 9.194 _
.~
(I)
-
LC
1.549x1011
9
" " " T , ; ~
.. . .. . .. . .. . ... . .. . . . . ."... . .
~ x
10
r~ 5000
~~
~.) :3 oo
oo 4 0 0 0
%
Q..
1
3000 zooo[ lx10 -2
,
,
t
,
0.1
1
10
100
Ti me, hrs
I 1000
o.1 _ 0.1
I
I
I
I
1
10
100
1000
lx104
t D/CD
Fig. 6-17. A linear i m p e r m e a b l e boundary shows as semilog straight line with a doubling o f slope on a semilog graph, and as a second flat region on a derivative graph. (After H o m e , 1990, fig. 3.8, p. 47.)
...3
Lab -...I
Finite Cond Froc Stg & Skn Homogeneous [nf Actng One Q
Finite Cond Frac Finite Conductivity Fmc 10'
I
I
J
I
,,
100
I
k 2004 Xf 197.3
l
i
i
k 20.04 c O.1025 s 9.194 10
1
PD
PD
0.1
- ,o.......,,,..,.,,,...,.,, ~
9
o ~176176176176176176176
oooOO~ I xld 2
l
IxlO '4
I
IxlO-2
,
I
i
I
I
I00 tDXf
o~
0.I
~
Ixi04
0.1
I
I
I
I
10
100
,
I
1000
Ix104
tD/CD
Fig. 6-18. A constant-pressure boundary shows as flat region on p vs. t graphs, and as a continuously decreasing line on a derivative graph. (After Home, 1990, fig. 3.9, p. 47.) On the right-hand side figure, the ordinate also shows (t D / CD)PD.
573
Log AP
------
AP - tAP'
or
Log t AP'
I
ff 7
Error in 6P
Log t Fig. 6-19. Log-log graph for identification of wellbore storage.
P'D = 0.5
(6-18)
Eqs. 6-14 and 6-16 indicate that the end points of the most used flow problem with regard to transient pressure analysis (i.e., infinite acting radial flow toward a well under the influence of wellbore storage), are fixed by two common asymptotes with a hump-shaped transition, which is a function of the wellbore condition group CD e2s
For this case of radial flow, real variables can be used to express Eq. 6-17, and a be introduced in a similar way as previously discussed for the wellbore storage case, reaching the same conclusion. The resulting equation is:
APerror c a n dAp wS t
dp _
-
Clr
(6-19)
where, aoq tip Clr = 2 kh
(6-20)
Thus, a graph of the field data for radial flow conditions would look like that shown in Fig. 6-20. For infinite acting linear flow conditions (Table 6-III), the pressure drop behavior in terms of dimensional variables can be expressed as follows:
APwf = CIL %ft--[- APski n "Jr"APerror Taking the pressure derivative yields:
(6-21)
574
Log AP or
Log tAP'
t AP'
Log t Fig. 6-20. Log-log graph for radial flow identification.
dAPw/ t
dt
-
C
(6-22) ~L
This expression yields a one-half slope straight line in a log-log graph, as indicated in Fig. 6-21. It can be observed that the pressure drop falls above the pressure derivative curve, and may also exhibit a one-half straight line slope in cases where APski n and AP~rro~ are zero. It is important to notice that the distance between the two one-half slope straight lines of this figure is 2.
Log2 Log &P or
Log t 8P'
/// AP ,
Log t Fig. 6-21. Log-log graph for linear flow identification.
t
AP'
575
/
Log AP
'
~
~
Log 4
or
Log t AP' AP
tAP'
Log t Fig. 6-22. Log-log graph for bilinear flow identification.
For bilinear flow in a hydraulically fractured well (Cinco Ley and Samaniego, 1981), the pressure drop behavior in terms of dimensional variables can be expressed as follows:
APwf
.
-
Clbf 4~"+ APskin + APerror
(6-23)
Taking the pressure derivative yields: t
dAPwl dt
Clbf ~4
(6-24)
As already mentioned for the previous cases, the effects of skin and error in the initial pressure measurement are eliminated when the pressure derivative function is used. Figure 6-22 shows a log-log graph for bilinear flow conditions of the pressure drop and of the pressure derivative function, the latter exhibiting a straight line of one quarter slope and located at a distance log 4 in the case where Apse, and Z~errorboth are zero. For infinite acting spherical flow conditions (Table 6-V), the pressure drop behavior is inversely proportional to the square root of time:
APwl = C"Ph
qsph ~17
(6-25)
Taking the pressure derivative yields: t
dApwl dt
C2~ph 2~
(6-26)
576
Log &P or _og t tiP'
/
/
~ t & p , Loa t Fig. 6-23. Log-log graph for spherical flow identification.
This equation indicates that a log-log graph of the pressure derivative function for spherical flow yields a straight line of slope equal to-1/2, as shown in Fig. 6-23. Finally, for pseudo-steady state radial flow conditions (Table 6-IV), the pressure behavior can be expressed as:
Log AP
I/
or
Logt AP'
tAp,~
1
Log t Fig. 6-24. Log-log graph for pseudosteady flow identification.
TABLE 6-V Spherical f l o w equations for h o m o g e n e o u s reservoirs*
-' [er~r~ e":~ Constant
Infinite
Flow Rate
Reservoir
LARGE TIME APPROXIMATION
SMALL TIME APPROXIMATION
GENERAL EQUATION
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS INNER OUTER
rD =l,
.e+ r,-' 4] po,~(to) = 1 - ~ ro >> 1 P,o,a, (ro'tD):-~DI erfc ( - ~r~ o)
,o,o.t,.i,.o~ Closed
,
_2(%_ ( % - 1)
[,
1)2 7 ( , ~ _ ~)2 + % (r D - 1/+
2 ( r ~ - 1)2 s ro
]
Same as infinite reservoir
Infinite
Pressure
Reservoir
['
-L~J ~n t~
2 ( r D - 1) ~-, + ~ B e r v ro ro .:,
E IS
Closed
E
v TO E I R S
2omtant
Po - ro r o
1
1 q D = l + ~--~O
2 ~ % = ( % _ 1-J) ~.=
r~- r
Same as infinite reservoir
ro = I qD --
rD=l,
22 w rw + ( r D - I ) ' 2 2 ._ .( %. ._ w.rD
1)
[ "~'~ ] -[~j
%=
e
2
w, ro + (r D - ~j
--
~
. . . . . .
(rz, - 1) L w , r o - ( t o
e
- 1)
%=1,
rD=], ~ n~tD
Same as infinite reservoir
red
~'essurc
qD = r D - - l + r D * After Chatas (1966)'
]
)
rD=l, R
(%-1) 2 + %
A e-[r: t~/(,,o-,)']
( .2
Constant
2
n=i
r o - ro po(to)=
-2(%-1)
( r D - 1) 3 ( r w - l ) ' + 2rD(r D - l) 2 + 3r~
2 % ( r D - 1) 2 + 3 r ~
Constant
Pressure
,o,,.t =i,r.o+,r.o-,,'l[
l[~o-,:(,.o.,).to]
-1
.--t e
qo--
%
- 1
".-..I
578
APw ! = C l~psst + C 2rpss+ APse. n + Z~Perror
(6-27)
Taking the pressure derivative yields:
dApwI t dt - C~st
(6-28)
Figure 6-24 presents a log-log graph of Ap and MAp /dt vs. time t. It can be observed that the line for the pressure derivative function is a straight line of slope equal to unity, and the pressure drop behavior follows a concave upward curve, which approaches the pressure derivative straight line. In summary, the pressure derivative function for the different flow regimes can be expressed as:
t
dAPwI - Ct" dt
(6-29)
where C, as indicated in the previous discussion of this section, is a constant that depends on the flow rate and on reservoir properties, and n has different values depending on the flow regime, as follows: Flow type
n
Wellbore storage Linear flow Bilinear flow Spherical flow Pseudo-steady state flow
1 1/2 1/4 -1/2 1
Figure 6-25 presents a graph that summarizes the previous discussions with regard to the pressure derivative function, for the most common flow regimes encountered in well tests. The derivative function in terms of dimensional parameters can be expressed as:
lto )
= P'o
kh t Ap wl OtoqBp f
where the derivative
AP'wl
]dp wl
(6-30)
AP'wlis given by Eq. 6-31"
dAp wl
(6-31)
Figure 6-26 presents the combined pressure and derivative function type curve for infinite acting radial flow toward a well under the influence of wellbore storage (Bourdet et al., 1983).
579
Wellbore Storage or
Pseudo-Steady-State
/~t/2 ~
Log tAP'
Line~
1
Bilinear
, ,,~
Radial
Spherical
Fig. 6-25. Pressure derivative function for six different flow regimes.
10 2
,
I ......
I
J
I'
CD
I0 60 1020
,.-,..
--.-,
,---
-.-,.,
-'--
"-"
....,,,
,,.
~0
I01
,,...=
....,,,
...,..,,
....,
u
I0 I0
m
0
\
,,i,-,,
\
"0 E o
\
\
oi0 0
\ a
lO-I/
i0"I
I I0 0
I IO I DIMENSIONLESS
\
\ \\
I ....... IO 2
I IO 3
TIME , | D/CD
Fig. 6-26. Pressure and pressure derivative function type curves for a homogeneous reservoir. (After Bourdet et al., 1983, fig. 7, p. 102.)
580 In this figure note that the pressure derivative function (tD/ CD)P'D shows a notably different behavior than that of pressure, because all the curves merge to a constant value of 0.5 regardless of the early-time storage-dominated pressure behavior. This is an important point to realize because pressure behavior alone presents the uniqueness problem with regard to flow diagnosis as is widely discussed in the literature. As mentioned above, early-time derivative function data are represented by a unit-slope line, which is also valid for the pressure data response. The late-time horizontal line described by Eq. 6-26 represents radial flow conditions. From the previous discussions in this section, it can be concluded that a combination of the pressure derivative function and of the conventional pressure graph presents the currently most powerful diagnostic tool available. It has been widely discussed in the literature that obtaining a constant flow rate during a test (especially at early times), is very difficult.Accordingly pressure buildup tests, when flow rate is equal to zero after the end of afterflow, are frequently preferred. The pressure change measured during a buildup test is the difference between the shut-in pressure Pws and the flowing pressure immediately before shutin ((Pws (At = 0)). Thus, the amplitude of the pressure drop at shut-in limits the magnitude of the buildup response. Therefore, the buildup type curve shape is a function of well and reservoir behavior and previous flow history. When the Homer method is applied to a test (i.e., infinite acting radial flow regime has been reached during drawdown), it is possible to match buildup pressure data on the derivative function drawdown type curves. This can be done provided the derivative of buildup data is taken with respect to the natural logarithm of the Homer ratio, instead of lnt which is used for drawdown (Bourdet et al., 1983). The expression for this case is given by the equation:
apws d In[At / ( t + At)]
_
(t + at) at
tP
AP'w,
(6-32)
where
AP'w"
dpw~ dAt
(6-33)
In summary, under the conditions just stated, the pressure derivative type curves of Fig. 6-26 also present the variation of the slope of the buildup data, graphed on a Homer semilog scale vs. time. Many studies have presented different methods for estimation of the pressure derivative of field data (Bourdet et al., 1983; 1984; Clark and van Golf-Racht, 1985; Home, 1990; Stanislav and Kabir, 1990; Sabet, 1991). The quality of the pressure data has a major influence on the calculation of the derivative function. It is the experience of the authors; and others (Clark and van Golf-Racht, 1985; Gringarten, 1985; Gringarten, 1987a, b; Ehlig-Economides et al., 1990; Home, 1990; Ramey, 1992) that data from electronic gauges are normally of sufficient density and of high enough resolution to be easily derived. However, the estimation becomes difficult in some
581 instances of reservoirs with high mobility-thickness products, due to the "noise" of some gauges being of the same magnitude as the pressure gradient. Crystal gauges have been successfully used in these cases (Clark and van Golf-Racht, 1985). As previously mentioned, there are different methods available for the estimation of pressure derivative. One such method has been proposed by Bourdet et al. (1989), who recommended this algorithm based on the finding that it best reproduces a complete type curve. It simply uses one point before (left) and one point after (right) the point of interest, calculates the two corresponding derivatives, and then places their weighted mean at the point of interest. The noise effect can be reduced by choosing the left and right points sufficiently distant from the point where the pressure derivative is to be calculated. However, the points should not be too far away because this will affect the shape of the pressure response. A compromise has to be made. The minimum distance L between the abscissas of the left and right points, and that of the point of interest, is expressed in terms of the time function being used, i.e., lnAt, Homer time, or the superposition time. If the data are distributed in geometric progression (the time difference from adjacent points increases with time), then the noise in the derivative estimation can be reduced by using a logarithmic numerical differentiation with respect to time (Bourdet et al., 1984; Home, 1990):
In (tj+ 1 tj_ 1 / tj2.)Apj t
-
din,
In (t.+ , / t.) In (tj / t._ 1)
= ln(L-+;-/Liln--~j-+;-/tj_l)
(6-34)
In ( tj.+l / tj) Apj _ l In (tj/tj_l)In (t.+l/t._l ) Using second-order finite differences, Simmons (1986) derived from a Taylor series expansion the following expressions; for the ith point:
At~-I Pj+ I "~" (Atff-- Ate_ l)Pj-- AtYpj_l ,2 < j _
Zlt}_lAt j + At~Atj_,
(6-35)
For the first pressure point, Simmons (1986) used a forward-difference expansion:
I (At1 At2)2 ] +
dp
At 2
1
(At I + Zlt2)2
P2 + P3
1 [(At~ + At2 )2 / A t I - ( A t I + At2) ]
Similarly, for the last point, a backward-difference expansion gives:
(6-36)
582
(Atn_ 1 + Atn_2)2
(Atn_ 1 4- Atn_2)2 J At 2
I(atn ,
"{"
atn-2)
-
P,
At 2n - 1
P. +
n-1
-
(At_ I + Atn_2)2 3 / At _ 1 J
1
"]" P. - 2
(6-37)
Simmons (1986) stated that the two main advantages of his algorithm is that it can handle unequal time-step pressure data, and also the second-order formulation improves the accuracy of the pressure derivative. One simple method that has proved through field use its usefulness, is based on a central difference aproximation to the pressure derivative, as given by Eq. 6-38 and presented graphically in Fig. 6-27:
+
1/2
,1 < j < n
t'+l--tj
(6-38)
The estimation of this derivative is assigned to the mid-time t between any pair of pressure points:
t.j.~=t.+(t.+,-9/2,1<j
(6-39)
Pcofj
i tof (P~f) j, I
,,\
i
i
'
t
(P~of) j + 2
i
i
i
,
tj
~i
tj+1
i
tj+z t
t j-1/2 Fig. 6-27. Central difference approximation to the pressure derivative.
583 Field experience has shown that this central difference aproximation method, when preceded by a proper smoothing pressure data procedure (e.g., moving average method, described later), works well. Table 6-VI presents, in general, the necessary calculations that have been previously described for the estimation of the pressure derivative function for a drawdown test. Figure 6-28 presents an example of how field data taken with a Bourdon type TABLE 6-VI Estimation of the pressure derivative function for a drawdown test Time t t o= O
Pwj
t
Pw/t
te
Pwz 2
t3
Pw! 3
Mid time t. +1/2
Pressure Change, Ap
At
Pressure derivative, Ap'
(tAp')j +1/2
t, +1/2
Ap,
At,
Ap', +,/e
(t
t2 + v2
AP2
At2
AP'2
+ v2
(t AP')2
0
0
A p ' ) , + l/2
10 3
o /Xp 9 tAp'
o
0
o
r
0
0
10 2 o oo
o
9
10
10 -1
1
10
Fig. 6-28. Example of field data taken with a Bourdon type gauge.
10 2
+ ,/2
584 gauge would appear when graphed in logarithmic scales in terms of the pressure difference Ap = (Pi--Pwf ) and of the pressure derivative function tdp /dt vs. time t. The noise present in the pressure derivative function is typical of field data. It must be kept in mind that the discussion of this section with regard to flow diagnosis has considered the simplest case of constant rate. If rate varies during a test, then the flow diagnosis process must be based on the influence function, which will be discussed later in the section entitled Analysis of Variable Flow Rate Using Superposition, Convolution, and Deconvolution (Desuperposition).
PRESSURE DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
A pressure drawdown test consists of bottomhole pressure measurements made over a period of time, with the flow rate constant. Besides this constant rate condition, the simplest type of these tests considers that pressure throughout the reservoir is uniform (static). If the constant rate production and the static pressure condition are not met, then other tests are available which can be used (Matthews and Russell, 1967; Earlougher, 1977; Cinco et al., 1985). According to the purpose for which they are performed, there are two such types of tests: (1) short-term drawdown tests are used to estimate, among other parameters, formation permeability and the skin effect; and (2) long-term or reservoir limit tests (Jones and McGhee, 1956) are used to estimate the reservoir volume in communication with the well. For radial flow conditions, the pressure at a point P(r,t) in the reservoir may be expressed as follows:
kh(p,-p (r,t)) aoqBp
=pD(ro,tD)
(6-40)
where Po is the dimensionless pressure solution for a specific radial flow problem. The dimensionless pressure solutions, Po, for the most common fluid flow situations have been thorougly discussed in the literature (Earlougher, 1977). For conditions of the wellbore, where % = 1, Eq. 6-40 can be written as follows:
(6-41)
kh(Pi- Pwj) = Po (1,to) = Pwz~ aoqBp
The pressure behavior of a well producing at a constant rate, located in the center of a radial infinite reservoir, may be expressed by the line source solution (also called the exponential-integral solution or the Theis, 1935, solution) (Matthews and Russell, 1967; Earlougher, 1977):
kh(pi-pwj) - 1 aoqBp 2 E, -go
( 1 1 1:1
4
w
(6-42)
585 where the exponential integral E 1 (x) is defined by:
~u du
E, (x) = - E i (-x) =
(6-43)
Equation 6-42 considers that the wellbore radius is negligible and, consequently, it is only valid for to> 25 (Mueller and Witherspoon, 1965). Values of this integral may be taken from various data tables (Nisle, 1956; Ramey et al., 1973). If the argument of the exponential integral is small enough then:
E, (x) z - I n (1.781 x) = In
( ~ - - ) - 0.5772, for x < O.O1
(6-44)
where ~/= 0.5772; the exponential of the Euler constant is denoted by ~/~= 1.781. The logarithmic approximation to the exponential integral given by Eq. 6-44 may be used when x > 100 (t D> 25). It can be easily shown that for average rock and fluid properties, this time limit occurs within seconds or minutes and consequently, the logarithmic approximation may be used for most practical purposes. Using this approximation, Eq. 6-42 can be written as follows:
kh(Pi-Pwl) aoqB p
l(~zl~)]Actr2 I In w 2
(6-45)
4 fl, kt
The flowing bottom-hole pressure Pwl can be expressed as"
Pwj
=Pi -
1.1513a qBp o kh
log
~].Actr2w
+ log
~/1
(6-46)
Equation 6-46 describes a straight-line relationship between Pwl and log t as shown schematically in Fig. 6-29. A drawdown graph, or in general any pressure graph, can be divided into three portions: (a) short time data or front-end effects (pressure behavior is under the influence of wellbore storage, damage, unstable flow conditions in the tubing string, etc.); (b) the semilog straight line portion applicable to the analysis by the semilog methods; and (c) boundary effects, which include boundaries and interference effects. The straight-line portion of this semilog pressure graph has a slope m defined by: m = 1.1513 a
qBu o kh
(6-47)
It is clear that if proper identification of the semilog straight line is possible, then an estimation of the formation conductivity (kh) may be obtained through the use of Eq. 6-47.
586 o
_
_
o-b b-c (b)c-d
FRONT END EFECTS SEMILOG STRAIGHT LINE BOUNDARY EFECTS
=3
Q_ t o 1 - .
0 LL 0 -1--
'
I'X
I
J
I
i
E
I I
0
0
~
I I I I I I
,
r'n
,
,I
,
(telt)d
,
d
I I l
(telt)dd
Logt Fig. 6-29. Typical bottomhole pressure semilog graph for a drawdown test. SKIN F A C T O R
The flow capacity of the producing formation in the vicinity of the wellbore commonly is reduced due to formation damage during drilling and completion. Reduced permeability is usually caused by partial plugging or mudding off of the region immediately surrounding the rock face during drilling. In some cases, the pore openings are large enough (in high-permeability formations) to permit entrance of mud solids provided the difference between the drilling fluid hydrostatic pressure and formation pressure is large enough. This physical problem is illustrated in Fig. 6-30a. Permeability reduction can be particularly important in formations having clay content. On the other hand, permeability close to the wellbore can be higher than that of the formation when acid is used to stimulate carbonate formations. In addition to the alteration of formation permeability near the well described above, there are other factors that affect fluid flow from the formation to the wellbore. Figure 6-30 shows the most usual flow restrictions to fluid flow towards a well. Figure 6-30b presents the physical situation of a filter cake adhered to the rock face of a formation, which commonly results in waterflooding operations. Among the materials that can filter out on a formation face, either in an openhole completion or through perforations, are silts, clays, scale, ferric hydroxide, and ferrous and ferric sulfides (Strubhar, 1972). Figures 6-30c to 6-30i illustrate other factors that can affect fluid the flow towards a well, e.g., partially penetrating well, flow through perforations, and slanted well.
587
h
I
k
lI
I ks
a)
(-
FILTER CAKE
, ks
I
rw
rs
k
rw
b) rw CASING CEMENT
hc ..______.~..--~
c)
rw
d)
LJ 'i
h
CONDENSATE OR GAS SATURATION
LL
{.i.~~ ~ o~,.
I
I I I L rw
e)
Q
o
~
9
~ o
| (b
ool
o o
o oo o
9
~
o 0
rw
f)
8w CEMENT SHEET
GRAVEL
o~
1
g)
h)
FRACTURE
h k I "
-xf
k'
k, rw
1 k xf
i) Fig. 6-30. Flow restrictions to the flow of fluids toward a well.
There are two classic mathematical visualizations for the skin factor : (1) mainly those of van Everdingen (1953) and Hurst (1953) on one hand, and (2) that of Hawkins (1956) on the other. The first two authors presented the skin factor concept as a constant s, which relates the pressure drop experienced by the fluid flowing toward the well to the rate of flow:
588
aoqBp Ap, = ~ s kh
(6-48)
This method represents wellbore damage by the steady-state pressure drop at the well face given by Eq. 6-48, which if added to the normal transient pressure drop in the reservoir, would result in the wellbore pressure. The additional pressure drop, referred to as the skin effect, is thought to occur in an infinitesimally thin skin zone located at the well face. Thus, the additional pressure drop caused by the different flow restrictions occurs at the well face. The degree of damage (or stimulation) is expressed in terms of the skin factor, s. This parameter ranges in value from about - 6 (Standing, 1972) for a hydraulically fractured well, to + oo for a highly-damaged well. According to the visualization of Hawkins (1956), the additional pressure drop caused by flow restrictions is thought to occur as the fluid flows through an adjacent finite zone of radius r~ with permeability ks. It can be demonstrated that the following relation exists for s:
S l sll,nlrl,
,649,
An expression for the bottomhole flowing well pressurep w/ may be written considering two pressure drops: a "natural" pressure drop imposed by reservoir and fluid properties, and the additional pressure drop caused by flow restrictions" aoqBp Pi-Pw/ = ~ [Po (ro' to, g e o m e t r y , . . . ) + s]
(6-50)
An important particular case of this equation is that of radial flow:
Pw/ = P i
-
1.1513 a~ kh
ii , l l4.tllooq . log
+ log
~ p c tr w 2
+~
?;
s
(6-51)
kh
or:
Pw/ = Pi -
1.1513 a~ kh
log
+ log ~ lA ct r 2w
~/1
+ 0.86859 s
(6-52)
From this equation, considering t = 1 an expression for the skin factor may be obtained: s = 1.1513
Pi--Pl _ log m
(6-53)
--log ~ctr2 w
~/
589
r•
.~ DAMAGED ZONE Oo
,~ .
o
9
h
T---
.
I,oog 0 o
O
o
o0o
Fig. 6-31. Flow toward a damaged well.
The skin factor s, estimated from the analysis of transient tests, is a total factor in that it includes all the factors (restrictions) that affect fluid flow toward the well (Fig. 6-30). It is the algebraic sum of the true skin factor S,r caused by damage to the completed portion of the well, and all the other pseudo-skin factors due to flow restrictions discussed with regard to Figs. 6-30b to 6-30i. Consider the situation in Fig. 6-31, where a partially completed well in the interval h c in a formation of thickness h is shown. It is assumed that the formation is damaged through a limited distance. Fluids flowing from the formation toward the well will flow as follows: (a) first under radial conditions over the full zone thickness in the region away from the wellbore; (b) will converge into the completed interval in the region near the wellbore; (c) essentially as radial flow through the damaged zone of thickness h; and (d) flow through perforations. Writing expressions for the pressure drops associated with the three flow restrictions, in addition to considering the possibility of the well being slanted and hydraulically fractured, an expression for the skin factor may be obtained (Standing, 1972)" h S -'~
hr
(Str -J- Sp) "1" S c "l" Sswp "~ S f
(6-54)
If a stimulation job is considered, then the true skin factor or formation damage must be calculated. From Eq. 6-54 one obtains: hc
Str = - - ~ (S -- S c - - Ssw p -- S f) -- Sp
Str
(6-55)
Table 6-VII shows a relation of recommended references for the estimation of the pseudo-skin factors. Throughout the literature several additional relationships among well producing conditions have been introduced, including those related to flow efficiency (also called
590 TABLE 6--VII Recommended references for the estimation of the pseudo-skin factors Pseudo-skin factor
Reference Hong (1975); Locke (1981); Karakas and Tariq (1991) Martin and Brons (1961); Odeh (1968); Cinco Ley et al. (1975); Papatzacos (1987); Vrbik (1991) Cinco-Ley et al. (1975) Prats (1961); Standing (1972); Cinco Ley et al. (1978)
Sp
Sc Sswp S/
the condition ratio or completion effectiveness) which denotes the fraction of a well with undamaged producing capacity. This concept is defined as the ratio of actual productivity index of a well ( J ) to its productivity index if there were no flow restrictions (s = 0), J/de,t: FE
=
Lctual
=
J'deal
ff -Pw:- Ap~
(6-56)
P--Pw!
In an approximate form this expression is usually written as: FE = P * - P w : - APs
(6-57)
P*-Pw/ The pressure drop resulting from the skin, Ap: is obtained from Eq. 6-58 using the expression for the slope m: Aps = 0.87 ms
(6-58)
Another relationship used to relate well-producing conditions is the damage factor, DF, which is obtained by subtracting flow efficiency from 1" DF = 1 - FE =
~Ps
(6-59)
P* -Pw/ It can be readily concluded from Eq. 6-57 that flow efficiency depends on the producing time because Pwt is a function of time. Thus, FE is not a constant. There are two possible conditions under which the FE could be a constant: (a) at pseudosteady state, the pressure difference p - - P w / i s constant, and (b) at steady state, p - should be replaced by p : the pressure at the well's drainage area. For a damaged well, flow efficiency is less than unity; for a stimulated well, flow efficiency is greater than unity. Flow efficiency is a convenience for discussing well condition (Ramey et al., 1973). For instance, for a damaged well ifFE is 0.33, then the well is producing one third as much fluid for a fixed pressure drawdown, the rate it would have if it was not damaged. From the previous discussion, one can conclude that flow efficiency provides an easier way to visualize the well condition than the dimensionless skin factor.
591
-
i e
I i
i two
I Pwf
',
i i
i i
i i
i i
rw
rs
Inr Fig. 6-32. Visualization of the apparent wellbore radius.
One last useful relationship to express well producing conditions is the apparent (effective) wellbore radius, r w . This concept is defined as the radius that would produce the calculated pressure drop in an ideal formation, equal to that in an actual formation, with flow restrictions (skin). Then, from Darcy's law:
'nllrwa 'nlw)
+s
(6-60)
or
r
wa
= r e -s
(6-61)
w
Figure 6-32 shows a visualization of the apparent wellbore radius r for conditions of a damaged well (s > 0), resulting in a smaller radius than actual r w, implying that fluids must theoretically flow through additional formation ( r w - rwa ) to give the required pressure drop. On the other hand for a stimulated well (s < 0), the apparent wellbore radius rwa is greater than rw. This concept has been found to be quite useful in discussing results of hydraulic fracturing. wa
PRESSURE T R A N S I E N T ANALYSIS FOR GAS W E L L S
During the last few years, an important effort has been made to study the flow of gases through porous media. In deriving the fundamental flow equation that describes gas flow, one considers the gas as real, and in doing this two of the assumptions stated previously with regard to the diffusivity equation are released: (a) pressure gradients are considered, and (b) the variation of gas viscosity (p) and gas compressibility factor (z) with pressure are taken into consideration. Analogous to the discussion of liq-
592 uid flow, the fundamental flow equation for the description of this problem, neglecting high velocity effects is:
v.
_ kVp ) r p(p)z(p) =
p Op k
(6-62)
Uz a t
This expression can be transformed to a form similar to the diffusivity equation (Eq. 6-1) by making use of a transformation called pseudopressure or real gas potential pp(p) defined by A1-Hussainy et al. (1966)"
pp(p) = 2
P o
(6-63)
dp
where Po is a low base pressure. In all problems involving gas flow through porous media, it is recommended that the first step be the evaluation of the relationship of pseudopressure pp(p) vs. pressure. Once the pp(p) function has been evaluated, any pressure may be converted to pp(p) and vice versa. There are basically two methods for the evaluation Ofpp(p)" (a) Using experimental PVT analysis of a representative sample of the gas produced by the reservoir includes information regarding variations in viscosity (p) and the gas compressibility factor (z) as a function of pressure, at reservoir temperature conditions. A numerical integration procedure can be used to estimate pp(p) as shown in general in Table 6-VIII. Usual values for the number of data points range between 7 and 11. The pressures pj, 1 < j < n, may be either equally spaced or at different pressure spacings. Figure 6-33 shows the variation of the argument 2p / l-t z vs. pressure. The most commonly used numerical integration technique to estimate pp(p) (the area under the curve from the reference pressure Po to p) is the trapezoidal rule, stated as follows: (6-64)
pp(p) = pp(,pj_ 1) + App(.pj_,), 2 < j < n
where TABLE 6-VIII Estimation of the potentialpp (p) using experimental PVT data p
p
z
2p/laZ
Pp(p)
Pl = Po P2
Pl P2
zl z2
2pl / pl z I 2P2 / P2 z2
0 Pp (P2)
2p._,/U._,z_, 2p, / p z
p~(p._,) pp(p,,)
P,_, P. = Pi
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
U._, P,,
z_, . z
593
T
z p/tt z
I ,,I,,
P~ Pz
I i
I I
Ps P4 p -----~ a) p = - 0
T
2 p/,= z
f
I
I I I
I I I I
I
I
I I,
I I
Pz
P3 b)
p
P,>O
Fig. 6-33. Graph of 2p / #z vs. pressure for a real gas.
Ap(pj_ ,) = (2pj / /..ljzj -b 2pj_I / [LIj_I ~_I)Apj_, / 2
(6-65)
Figure 6-34 shows a typical p.(p) vs. p curve for a gas reservoir. (b) Using published correl~tions. There are two basic correlations for the estimation ofp p (p). First, the A1-Hussainy et al. (1966) correlation for sweet gases, based on Carr et al. (1954) for It and Standing and Katz (1942) for z, using p = 0.2 as the reference pressure. Second, the correlation of Zana and Thomas (1970)Pfor sour gases using Robinson et al. (1960) correction ratios to calculate z. The reference pressure
594
t O..
v
Po
P "''~
Fig. 6-34. Graph of pseudopressure vs. pressure for a real gas. used wasp = 1. Other recent correlations of mathematical form are those of SchafferPerini and PlVIiska (1986) and Aminian et al. (1991). Substituting the definition of the real gas potential pp(p) into Eq. 6-62, and considering the formation compressibility yields:
wp (p) =
/~ (p)c, (p) Opp(p)
(6-66)
k
where the total system compressibility compressibility, are defined as follows:
c,(p),
and the modified pore volume
ct(P) = S cg (p) Jr"S Cw "l- C f~
(6-67)
c 1' =--~ --~p = (1-d?)c I
(6-68)
It is common practice to approximate the total system compressibility c, given by Eq. 6-67 by the gas saturation-gas compressibility product Sg cg (p). A comparison of the fundamental equation that describes the flow of real gases through porous media (Eq. 6-66) with Eq.6-1 shows that the form of the diffusivity equation is preserved if the flow of real gases is expressed in terms of the pp(p) function. There are important differences between the two equations, among them the non-linear nature of Eq. 6-66, because diffusivity is a function of potential (or pressure), and pressure gradients are not considered to be negligible.
595 An important particular case of Eq. 6-66 is that which corresponds to radial flow according to the equation:
10 r
Or
(~pp(p)]~[l.l(P)Ct(p)~pp(p) r = Or k c3t
(6-69)
The case of a well producing at a constant mass flow rate, located at the center of a radial reservoir, has been numerically solved by A1-Hussainy et al. (1966). It was concluded that for transient flow conditions (infinite acting period), the flow of real gases correlates extremely well with liquid flow solutions obtained by solving the diffusivity equation, provided the dimensionless time is evaluated at initial values of viscosity and compressibility. Thus, for the transient flow conditions to < t o , one can write the following engineering approximation: (6-70)
PpD (l"tD) = PD (l'tD)
It has been shown (A1-Hussainy and Ramey, 1966; Wattenbarger and Ramey, 1969) that Eq. 6-70 can be generalized to Consider the effects of skin damage and high velocity, resulting in: (6-71)
PpD (1,to) = 1.1513(log to + 0.3513) + s + D(~)qce
where the first term on the right-hand side is the line source solution, and the last term represents the non-Darcy flow pressure loss due to high velocity effects (Ramey, 1965). As a first approximation, the non-Darcy flow coefficient is usually assumed to be constant, neglecting its dependency on fluid viscosity. In dimensional form, Eq. 6-71 can be expressed as follows:
q~cP~cT Pp (Pw:) = Pp (P) - 1.1513a ~ [ l o g ( g khT sc
14fit I rl
log ~
d-0.86859
(s + Dqsc) ]
kt
) +
~) [IA (dOi)Ct (Pi)r w2
(6-72)
This expression provides the basis for the interpretation of drawdown tests in gas wells. Lee et al. (1985) studied the main limitations of this equation with regard to the dependency of D on fluid viscosity. They concluded that the approximation of Wattenbarger and Ramey (1969), given by:
D(I~)
].,t i = O(lAi)~
(6-73)
[Alan
may be improved if the flow velocity-dependent skin is considered as the product C1D[I.Ii Iq~l, where C~ is a constant that depends on the flow regime prevailing during the test (laminar or Darcy, transition or high velocity). In the above expression, the i
596 index represents evaluation of the parameter at initial conditions, and ]'~lam is the viscosity that would occur at the wellbore if flow were laminar or Darcy. From this discussion, it seems that the most one can obtain from the analysis of a gas well test regarding the rate-dependent skin is D or the product C~D(IAi) in the conventional way (when information for at least two different drawdown and/or buildup tests, at two different constant flow rates, is available: Ramey, 1965). This procedure clearly assumes that the parameter D is a constant. A promising method for the analysis of gas well tests influenced by high-velocity effects was presented by Fligelman et al. (1981). The authors suggested a trial-anderror procedure that results in proper estimations of formation conductivity, skin factor and non-Darcy flow coefficient.
Example 6-1. Pressure buildup test in naturally-fractured gas well A-1 (Samaniego V. and Cinco-Ley, 1989) Well A-1 is located in a naturally-fractured gas reservoir whose main fractures run along the crest of a structure, and resulted from folding. This well is geographically located in northem M6xico, and is completed in the vicinity of the reservoir crest. Gas production from the reservoir is due mainly to the presence of fractures because the matrix has very low permeability. The lower Cretaceous reservoir in the well is composed of an altemating sequence of microdolomites and limestones. Usually, porosity of the microdolomites is good and permeability is low, but the latter has been increased by the presence of fractures. Well logging and core analysis evidently show the intersection of one of these fractures whose height is approximately 7 ft (2.1 m). Table 6-IX illustrates reservoir and fluid data pertinent to this well. The gas produced is fairly dry, with a specific gravity of 0.56. A routine pressure buildup was run on the well, with the main purpose of checking its drainage volume average pressure conditions for reserve estimations. Table 6-X presents the transient pressure data recorded during the test in terms of pseudo-time At and of the real gas potential pe(pw). Due to the relatively high flow rate of this well (10, 800 Mscf/D through a 2.7/8 in. tubing) the bottom-hole pressure must be corrected by TABLE 6 - I X Reservoir and fluid data for well A-1 T(~ ~b, fraction c t (at average shut--in pressure conditions), psi -l
169 0.06 3.8 x 10-4
Component
Volume %
Cl C2 C3 N2 CO 2 Total
97.75 0.39 0.02 1.68 0.16 100
Type o f completion: openhole 9.5 in. diameter from 1950 - 2328.5 m
597 TABLE 6-X Buildup test data for well A-1 q, Mscf/D Element depth, m
10,800 1900
At
At a
Pp(P)
(hours)
(hr-psi/cp x 10-4)
psi2/cP • 104
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1 1.50 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 68
3.38 11.27 15.15 18.60 25.61 33.51 48.80 63.76 79.14 93.26 109.50 123.08 183.90 242.88 306.03 365.00 425.47 486.65 546.65 607.83 670.98 732.16 794.13 850.27 913.43 1043.66
379.0 380.2 382.6 384.8 385.8 387.6 389.4 392.0 395.4 397.9 400.5 402.3 404.1 409.5 414.4 418.0 422.9 425.8 428.7 432.1 434.9 436.9 439.8 442.2 444.1 446.1 447.5
the friction and turbulent effects involved. With the above purpose in mind, Fig. 6-35 shows a graph of potential drop Ap (p) [= Pp(Pws)-Pp. (Pwl (At = 0))] vs. pseudo-time Ate. The circles show the full datfrecorded during the test, and the triangles are an enlargement of the information up to At = 200 x 1 0 4 h r - p s i / c P . It is shown, as expected because shut-in occurred at the surface, that the early data (At = 30 x 104 hr -psi / c P ) follow a straight line whose extrapolation to the origin is Ap (Pwl (At = O)correcte) , which is equal to 44.5 x 104 psF / cP. Adding this value to t~e potential evaluated at the flowing measured pressure conditions, a corrected flowing potential before shut-in would be 379 x 1 0 6 psi 2 /cP. Using the corrected value of flowing potential, the log-log graph of Fig. 6-36 was constructed in terms of potential drop and pseudo-time. It is observed that after a transition period following the early time wellbore storage-dominated pressure behavior, data follow up to the end of the test, a half-slope straight line for more than a log cycle. The data of Fig. 6-36 can be matched to the Ramey and Gringarten's (1975) type curve for infinite-conductivity, vertically-fractured wells, with the curve a
598 PSEUDO 200
- TIME
sat=
400
, HR-PSI/CPxlO 6()0
"4 800
lOOO 140
,=
I0
o ,...= 100
U
J
U N 0
r
0
-
if)
0
-
100
.-7 0 J!
0 I!
O-L
80
i
r
o[ 0 O.
0o m
3=
0
0
o
Q.
&
A
-
60
== I
O.
60 r
Q.
- 20
Q.
(~t-Ol}correcte d 40 0
a.
4.5 x IO s P S I Z / C P
t
1
t
40
80
120
PSEUDO - T I M E
160
, At,~HR-PSI/CP
200
z 10 - 4
Fig. 6-35. Graph o f pseudopressure drop vs. pseudotime for the buildup test in w e l l A-1.
of dimensionless wellbore storage ( CD)f = 0 05 From match point data and the deftnitions of dimensionless potential and dimensionless time, estimates of formation conductivity kh and the ratio k / x 2 are 116.5 mD/ft and 1.02 x 10-5 mD-ft 2, respectively. From these values, kx2h2 is 1.3 x 109 mD-ft 4. Further analysis could not be carried out because formation thickness was not known (see Table 6-IX). Figure 6-37 shows a graph Ofpp(pws) vs. x/-~a. The linear flow straight-line slope is 2.29 x 104 psi: / c P ( h r - p s i /cP) z/2, and passes through the corrected wellbore flowing pseudopressure. As indicated by the type curve analysis, the first data points are influenced by wellbore storage. Analysis of the information provided by this graph yields kx2h: = 2.4 x 109 mD-ft 4, which agrees with the value estimated from type curve analysis. Figure 6-38 is a graph of the buildup data in terms ofp ( p ) and At. The use of this Miller-Dyes-Hutchinson graph is appropriate because of the long production period (several months) of the well before shut-in. Semilog analysis could not be carried out and, consequently, an estimate of the average pressure (the main objective of the test) can not be obtained. Neverthless, an upper limit for formation conductivity kh can be obtained tracing the semilog straight-line through the last data points, which results in a value of kh = 152.3 m D - f t . m
9
"
"
p_
ws
a
Example 6-2. Pressure analysis for exploratory well A-1 (Samaniego et al., 1985) Well A-1 is a gas condensate producer located in northern Mexico. The producing formation is a naturally-fractured packstone of lower Cretaceous age. All information
599 TRACING PAPER ~ i0 s 10
i i.o
....
Match
point
(Ato) M = !0 ~ HR-PSI/CP N~
[App(p )]
10 2 I
-
I" i"
, (%D)M = 4 . 5 x 1 0
"I~
: 100 xlO s PSlZ/CP ,(PPD)M = 1 . 2 1 _
M ( C Df )M = 0.05
J
f
i~ I
'
Io-'!
I I i
i
! I
i
l
04
)5
t
I
1()6
107
'
1
10-3 Ato
, HR - PSI
i
. I0
/ CP
toxf
Fig. 6-36. Match of the pressure data for the buildup test in wellA-1 to the infinite-conductivity, verticalfracture solution of Ramey and Gringarten (1975).
available indicates that the fractured zone is very localized, and it resulted from tectonic stresses of the Laramide orogeny. Well logging and petrophysical information clearly show the presence of the fracture system, and a tight matrix. Production from this well is due mainly to the presence of these fractures. Table 6-XI shows reservoir and fluid data pertinent to this well. The fluid produced has a specific gravity of 0.902, a dew point pressure of 3015 psig, and contains a small portion of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. A four-rate test was run in this well to determine formation parameters of interest, well potential, and reserves. Table 6-XII partially presents transient pressure data recorded during the test for the three first flow rates. Data for the fourth-rate test are disregarded because a reliable flow rate estimate could not be obtained. A high-sensitivity quartz crystal, pressure-sensing gauge was used in the test. Figure 6-39 is a cartesian graph of the pressure data registered during the test. One important aspect shown by these data is the linear relationship between pressure and time, especially observed in the longer third flow period, which is characteristic of pseudosteady-state flow. It is important to notice that the bottom-hole flowing pressure was always higher than the PVT-determined dew point pressure.Another key point is the pressure buildup data registered for a period of about 9 hr, showing an apparent pressure stabilization far below the initial pressure prevailing at the start of the test. This is the first clear indication of the small size of the reservoir discovered by this well.
600 450
//
440 i
0 ~,r
LINEAR FLOW STRAIGHT L I N E ' ~
420-
~3
,,
n (,.)
400 .~
o,I m.
. ~ i
0
0
PSI~/cP ( HR- PSI/CR ~/2
qmtf = 2.29 x104
n =,
Q.
-380. ~ ~
oSWELLBORE STORAGE oo~,.~Eo o ~
I
o.
__ ~ P p
,~
(Pw f 1 A t = 0 1 1 = 5 7 8
I
C)
10
,
-i 5 x l 06
!
20
" PSI2/CP
t
:30
, ~ 6 t O , , ( HR - PSI /CP)'/2
40 xlO"
5~
2
Fig. 6-37. Square-root-data graph for the drawdown test in well A-1. TABLE 6--XI Reservoir and fluid data for well A-1 T(~ #, fraction Specific gravity Type of completion:
138 0.07 0.902 openhole
Gas Composition Component
Mole %
CO2 N2 Methane Ethane Propane
0.0013 0.0061 0.6932 0.0900 0.0519 0.0192 0.0282 0.0199 0.0108 0.0192 0.0602
iso-Butane
n-Butane iso-Pentane
n-Pentane Hexane Heptane plus
For a moment, let us approach the analysis of this test in the conventional way, that is using a multiple rate test analysis technique. The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 6-40. It should be clear that this is an approximation because of the long three-
601
_)
/
440 ~) I
o o~ 'j n t)
420
!
0
r
o
or) n
m= 7 3 xlO6
]
PSIa/CP
CYCLE
0 0
(n
0
400 0
0
c1. 0 0
Q.
0 0
0
380 0 4
10 5 Pseudo-
10 6 time
A t a , HR-PSl
10 7
10 8
/CP
Fig. 6-38. MDH graph for the buildup test in well A-1.
time intervals corresponding to the different flow rates. It is obvious from the results that no straight line is shown by the data, which is expected in light of our previous comments regarding Fig. 6-39. In relation to the discussion regarding the possibility of pseudosteady-state flow conditions affecting the test, Figs. 6-41 and 6-42 present graphs of the pressure derivative function tdpo(p wJ,,) / d t vs. t for the pressure data registered during the first and third flow rates. Tl~e results of Fig. 6-39, and especially those of Fig. 6-42, indicate the presence of pseudosteady-state flow affecting the test, starting at a time of about 2 - 4 hours. Figure 6-41 provides the possibility to obtain a value of formation conductivity kh, because an approximate horizontal portion is shown by the curve. Based on this information, the definition of tD dpp D /dto, and using a value of 0.5 for the dimensionless pressure derivative function (which corresponds to radial infiniteacting flow), a kh of 657 mD-ft is calculated. The data of the second flow period will be discussed later in reference to operating problems experienced during the test, which resulted in important variations of flow rate. A point that deserves to be stressed is that even though a high-sensitivity pressure gauge was used in the test, the data of Fig. 6-41 showed such scatter that an analysis was practically impossible. To improve this situation a smoothing data routine was programmed which involved a variable number of data points. This procedure is discussed further by Cinco et al. (1985). Without the use of this routine, the raw data for the first flow rate did not show any clear indication of the flow regime affecting the test. The data presented in this figure were calculated using 11 points (5 forward and 5 backward
602 TABLE 6-XII Three-rate flow test for well A-1 t
(hr) 0 0.083 0.10 0.42 0.67 0.92 1.17 1.42 1.67 1.92 2.17 2.42 2.67 2.92 3.17 3.42 3.67 3.92 4.17 4.42 4.67 4.92 5.17 5.42 5.67 5.92 6.17 6.42 6.67 7.17 7.67 8.17 8.67 9.17 9.67 10.17 10.67 11.17 11.67 12.00 12.25 13.17 13.67 14.17 14.67 15.17 15.67 16.17
t
q
(Mscf/D) ql ~ 1158
q2 ~ 1518
siE/cp) x 10-9 1.08288 1.08161 1.08146 1.08144 1.08137 1.08118 1.08101 1.08081 1.08074 1.08060 1.08049 1.08044 1.08027 1.08016 1.08006 1.08005 1.07995 1.07988 1.07981 1.07973 1.07967 1.07963 1.07958 1.07955 1.07951 1.07935 1.07930 1.07921 1.07918 1.07894 1.07888 1.07877 1.07864 1.07862 1.07851 1.07844 1.07832 1.07820 1.07807 1.07799 1.07652 1.07611 1.07606 1.07584 1.07572 1.07565 1.07550 1.07528
(hr) 22.17 22.67 22.92 23.67 24.17 24.67 25.17 25.67 26.17 26.67 27.17 27.67 28.17 28.67 29.17 29.67 30.17 30.67 31.17 31.67 32.17 32.67 33.17 33.67 34.67 35.67 36.67 37.77 38.77 39.77 40.77 41.77 42.77 43.77 44.77 45.77 46.77 47.77 48.77 49.77 50.77 51.77 52.77 53.77 54.77 55.77 56.77 57.77
(Mscf/D)
p(pO
siVcP) x 10-9
1.07355 1.07341 q3 ~ 3120
1.07336 1.06819 1.06710 1.06678 1.06658 1.06643 1.06615 1.06596 1.06575 1.06553 1.06530 1.06509 1.06486 1.06458 1.06435 1.06412 1.06388 1.06364 1.06340 1.06318 1.06295 1.06250 1.06204 1.06160 1.06111 1.06065 1.06020 1.05974 1.05929 1.05882 1.05837 1.05790 1.05743 1.05701 1.05651 1.05607 1.05559 1.05510 1.05464 1.05423 1.05372 1.05330 1.05283 1.05241 1.05191
603
TABLE 6-XII
t (hr)
(contd.)
q (Mscf/D)
si2/cp)
x
t (hr)
10-9
1.07525 1.07514 1.07503 1.07548 1.07471 1.07457 1.07442 1.07427 1.07413 1.07390 1.07373
16.67 17.17 17.67 18.17 18.67 19.17 19.67 20.17 20.67 21.17 21.67
q (Mscf/D)
P(p(P
si2/cp)
58.77 59.77 60.77 61.77 62.77 63.77 64.77 65.77 66.77 67.77 68.77 69.77
x
10-9
1.05143 1.05095 1.05047 1.05004 1.04951 1.04912 1.04869 1.04820 1.04775 1.04734 1.04685 1.04643
4 400 F
1/8' ~,.
5/32" i i
3/16"
li i i i i i i i i i
4 550 (.D Q._
**%. OO%o 4 300
1/8" _, 1 SHUT-IN
.._,
i i
%o
i i
i i i i i i i i 00000
,-
.
4250 0
20
40
60
80
100
t, HR Fig. 6-39. Pressure data registered during the test in well A-1.
of the center point) in the smoothing process. On the other hand, the data of the third flow period could be analyzed without the need of being smoothed beforehand. Figure 6-43 exhibits the results of this test for the first three flow periods according to the graphical pseudosteady-state high-velocity flow technique discussed by Samaniego et al. (1985, their fig. 1). The pseudopressure drop for these flow conditions, considering variable flow, was expressed by these authors as follows:
604 15
--"
! 0 X
0 0 0 0 I
0
....
0
13-
0
oo
o4
0
C~
0
0
Z
0 v
/ 0 I 0
I
~b
0
oa ~
0
0
0
|
-1
0
1
~ (qi-qJ-1) ~o(j (t-t j_1) qN
d=l
Fig. 6-40. Graph for the multiple-rate drawdown test in well A-1. l0 T
13_ r
oo/
r
10 6
10s 10-1
1
10 t, HR
Fig. 6-41. Pressure derivative function for the first flow rate, well A-1.
lO 2
605 10 8
Sj
n I.=...4 f.r) n
10 7
L/ 1
10 6
o 9
10 -1
1
10
t,
10 2
HR
Fig. 6-42. Pressure derivative function for the third flow rate, well A-1.
1.5
9- - ,
|
" ' I
,ql Aqz oq3
I
o >(
L.L..
(.3 C~
1.0 f
f "-'
2
~
0.5 ~I I
~**~
<3 0 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
f(t) Fig. 6-43. Normalized graph of bottomhole pressure for the multiple-rate drawdown test in well A-1.
606
pp (pi)--pp (pwf) qN =
2rcag fl, p~cT
q~-qi-t
~
l~(Pi)Ct(Pi)Lc
( qN
I/A1 /22458/
+ agPscT kh T c
In ~ + In rw2
+ (s + DqN)
CA
) (t- ti_,)
1
(6-74)
It is clear that this is the equation of a straight line with slope m* and intercept b* given by Eqs. 6-75 and 6-76: m* =
2 rCag fl, P~cT
(6-75)
Ahd? ~ (Pi)Ct(Pi)Lc
E/A//22458/ -khrsc
b* - agP~cT
In
+ In
+ (s + DqN)
1
(6-76)
Thus, multiple-rate pseudosteady-state test data should appear as a straight line when plotted as:
pp (pi)__pp (pwf) qN
N
vs. Z ( i-1
qi--qi qN
-') ( t - t~l )
The author's fig. 1, and Eq. 6-74, indicate that shifting of the straight-line behavior predicted by this equation is due to high-velocity effects affecting the test. This being the case, the intercepts can be used provided a value for the skin factor is available, through a graph of [APe(p) / q]i,, vs. q. This procedure is similar to that used in the semilogarithmic analysis of high-velocity flow tests (Ramey, 1965). One can observe in Fig. 6-43 that the parallel straight-line portions are well defined only for the first and third flow periods because as already mentioned, the flow rate of the second flow period could not be kept approximately constant. The function fit) on the horizontal axis is given by the summation of the first term on the right-hand side of Eq. 6-74. Using Eq. 6-75 for slope m*, using customary units (see the Nomenclature section), a value for the hydrocarbon pore volume V or gas volume at reservoir conditions V of 3.36 x 106 ft 3 is obtained, or expressed at standard conditions, the G value is 89~ MMscf. Figure 6-44 shows a graph of the intercepts of the two well-defined straight line portions of Fig. 6-43. Assuming independent estimates for the formation conductivity kh and the skin factor s are available, then the shape factor CA and the high-velocity coefficient D can be calculated. Unfortunately, this is not the case for the subject test, even if a great effort was made to get this information. It was expected that the estimate for kh could be acquired through transient flow analysis of the data, but this behavior shows during a very short period for these tests. Additional discussion re9
o
P
607
'o ~ C:3
0.4
LL (.J rE')
:E
EL (j
,-, or)
J
0.3
J
CL
m~l~ = PSIZ/CP 0.459 (MSCF/ D )2
I..Z -4---I
E)"
~.
0.2 ) 1
J
f
f
f
I
J
f
EL ,..._..,, EL
EL <:3
0.1 0
1000
20(~Z)
3000
4000
q, MSCF / D Fig. 6-44. Graph of intercepts of the straight line portions of the normalized graph ofbottomhole pressure vs. flow rate, well A-1.
garding this aspect is presented later. It has been discussed regarding Figs. 6-39 and 6-43 that data for the third flow rate show the best linear relationship between pressure and time. An alternative method for presenting these data can be through the use of the principle of superposition, considering that pseudosteady-state flow conditions applies. Then the resulting expression is essentially Eq. 6-74 if multiplied by qN" Figure 6-45 presents the data registered for this flow period in accordance to this method and, as expected, the alignment of the data is excellent. It should be clear that the slope of this graph and that of Fig. 6-43 have to be the same; this is approximately the case because the two values of 150 and 146.86 psiE/cP/Mscf/D hr compare well. Using this last figure one can estimate a value for the original gas volume G of 914 MMscf. The previous discussion has addressed the important point of smoothing pressure data to obtain a better analysis of tests. Figure 6-46 is a cartesian graph of the pressure derivative function tdp.(p ,)/dt, using the raw data vs. t in accordance with the method presented by Cinco e(alW~(1985), for the analysis of pressure data taken under the influence of an unknown trend. An analysis of the non-smoothed (raw) data is practically impossible. One can clearly see the improvement shown by the smoothed data; better results are obtained when 11 points (Fig. 6-48) instead of 5 (Fig. 6-47) are used. According to the method of these authors, one could expect the data to follow a straight line portion of intercept m/2.303 when graphed in this manner. This is not evidently the case due, among other factors, to the variation of flow rate during this portion of the test.
608 1070 0
*% 0
Q_
1060 In
m = 146.86
3 Q.
PSIz/CP MSCF/D-HR
Q..
1050
--
4-
5
10
15
$
~l
(qjL-qj_l) ( t- tj_l) , MSCF/D-HRxlO'*
Fig. 6-45. Pseudosteady-state flow superposition graph for the third flow rate, well A-1. u 0 0
0 Q_
o t,
,
o
I.,--4
r 12.
o o
o
o
o
0
~ o
0
0 0
o
o
000
--~ ..........
0
n-~ 0
o
0
0
0
O0
0
0
o 0
0
0
O0 0
00
o
o~
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
t, HR Fig. 6-46. Cartesian graph of the pressure derivative function based on raw data of the second flow rate, well A- 1.
609
0
O
o
X
0 o
o
r---
o
o
o
o
o
9
i
(3_ 0
0
I i
0
o
i i
i O
0 0
OO OO
0 0
!
O
i
O
O O
O
o
O O O
q: D O
I
O
o O OD
0
O ---~O'O--
OO
o
OO
0
O
O O
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
t,HR Fig. 6-47. Cartesian graph of the pressure derivative function based on five-point smoothed data, second flow rate, well A-1.
4, o O OO
O
O
O r'--.-
L
O
O0
3,
0 OU 0
O 0
~'O
0
0
OO
0
OO O
O O
0000000
.+..J ID
oO. oO O
o Oo
o o
O
D O O O O O (~
0 0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
t,HR Fig. 6-48. Cartesian graph of the pressure derivative function based on 11-point smoothed data, second flow rate, well A-1.
610 10 r
b
i,,-,.-,X
n (._)
g
O0 CL 0
,,,,.
106
0
0
.......................
.0
1,v
0 0
0 0
0
@
o 0
O~
lO s
10"1
1
10
t, HR Fig. 6-49. Pressure derivative function for the second flow rate, well A-1.
106.2ool o o 10/6.
'
'
1
d
o
o o
GO o
Z '
o
0
o
10/6.1
o
o
I
0
0
0
0
,~'***
| o
o I) 0
0
0
0
0
O0
0
i
0 o 0
IO?E 1.150
1.100
t+ 9 At
q2
Log~ At ) + ~
1.200
Log At
Fig. 6-50. Graph for the two-rate flow test, well A-1.
10 2
611 Smoothed data for the second flow period of Fig. 6-48 are shown in a double logarithmic scale in Fig. 6-49. As it is expected, one can not identify the flow regime prevailing during the test. This graph is based on partial data registered during the test, and it could be concluded that a short radial infinite acting period, represented by the horizontal behavior of the curve, is present in the test between 1.7 and 2.0 hr. This being the case, the data can in principle be analyzed as a two-rate flow test. Figure 6-50 shows the results of this analysis considering more data points. There is no alignment of the pressure data and, consequently, a two-rate flow test interpretation can not be made. In this test the flow rate measurement was practically continuous, which explains the oscillation of the two-rate semilogarithmic graph of this figure.
A G A R W A L ' S (1980) M E T H O D TO ACCOUNT F O R P R O D U C I N G - T I M E E F F E C T S IN THE ANALYSIS OF BUILDUP TESTS
Since its introduction in the petroleum engineering literature in the early 1970s by Ramey and co-workers (1970), type curves for the interpretation of early time data have prompted profound changes in the techniques of analysis. A type curve is prepared for the specific flow problem in the field, considering a given set of inner and outer boundary conditions. Most of the type curves which have been developed and published to date consider drawdown solutions. The application of drawdown type curves in analyzing pressure buildup (or fall off) data is adequate when the following time criterion is met: if producing time to prior to shut-in is sufficiently long compared to the shut-in time At, that is, ( t -~ At) / t 1) for liquid systems, pressure buildup data can be analyzed using draffdown typ~ curves. If this criterion is not met, or in other words the producing time prior to shut-in is of the same order of magnitude or only slightly larger than the shut-in times At [ that is, (to + At) / t >> 1], then the use of drawdown type curves to analyze pressure buildup data is not P justified. Typical field situations where the time criterion is not met would include drillstem tests and pre-frac tests on low-permeability gas wells. It is clear that accounting for the duration of producing time is necessary, and some papers have addressed this matter. McKinley (1971) published buildup type curves for the analysis of pressure data. These, however, closely resemble drawdown type curves, because the producing time range used was long, and obviously can not be used to analyze pressure data registered under short producing conditions. Later, Crawford et al. (1977) discussed the previous limitations of the McKinley type curves, and presented new type curves for short producing times. An excellent discussion of the effect of producing time on type curve analysis has been presented by Raghavan (1980), who clearly states the limitations involved in the use of drawdown type curves. Agarwal (1980) developed a method for radial flow to overcome the difficulties involved and to eliminate dependence on producing time. This method permits one to account for the effects of producing time, and also data are normalized in a way that instead of utilizing a family of type curves with producing time as a parameter, available drawdown type curves may be used. The principle of superposition has to be applied to pressure drawdown solutions to
612
Pi
t (AP)drawdown
Pws(tp+At)--~.~..
(t)~
IJ_l OC :Z:) r 03 ILl Or" n
I*.I* (Al~)buildup
l/
(AP)difference"
' ~- pwf(fp+ At ) -~-
.7 l - -
CONSTANT RATE DRAWDOWN
'"
. . . .BUILDUP ..
tp ~_.. ,. . . . .
I
t
--I ~
~1 ,
At . . . . . . .
i
!
TIME Fig. 6-51. Schematic of pressure buildup behavior obtained after a constant rate drawdown.
obtain a pressure buildup solution. The result is buildup pressures at shut-in time At after a production time t. Figure 6-51 is a schematic of pressure buildup behavior obtained after a constant rate drawdown for a production period t.P Buildup pressures, . pw~(t + At), are shown in terms of shut-in time At. This figure also shows the pressure behavior of the well if it had continued open to production beyond t.p. Applying the principle of superposition to drawdown solutions results in the following expression:
kh[p,-pw
aoqBp
+ At)]
=
[(t + AO
]-pwo[(at)o]
(6-77)
An expression can be obtained for the dimensionless flowing pressure corresponding to Pws(t ) (or pw~(At - 0)) which, if substracted from Eq. 6-77, gives:
kh[Pw~ (t + At)-pw~(At = 0)] = pwo[(t)z~]-Pwz~[(t + At)D] + pwo[(At)o] aoqBp
(6-78)
613 This isAgarwal's (1980) equation 5, which provides the basis for buildup type curves. A simplification of this equation is commonly used to justify the use of drawdown type curves to analyze buildup data. If producing time tP is sufficiently longer than shut-in time At, then Eq. 6-78 can be written as:
kh[Pws (t + At)-pw~(At = 0)] = Pwo[(AtD)] aoqBp
(6-79)
A comparison of Eq. 6-79 and the pressure drawdown equation of Eq. 6-41 implies that (Ap)d~awdow,flowing time t is equivalent to (AP)buitdup VS. shut-in time At where: (6-80)
(AP)drawdown = P i - P w j
and (6-81)
(AP)buildup = Pws( t -I- At) --Pws (At =0)
It should be clear that because Eq. 6-79 has been derived from general buildup Eq. 6-78, based on the assumption of a long producing period t, the difference between the first two terms of Eq. 6-78 should be equal approximately to zero. Figure 6-51 shows this difference as the cross-hatched area which is defined as follows: (AP)difference = Pws(At =
(6-82)
O)-Pwj (t + At)
It can be shown that as producing time t gets smaller, or if At gets larger, then the difference expressed by Eq. 6-82 can not l~e ignored. Hence, drawdown type curves should not be used to analyze pressure buildup data. This difference is visualized in an easier manner through a graph of (Ap)d~awdow,VS. flowing time t, compared with (Ap)buildu p VS. shut-in time At, for different producing times tp (Fig. 6-52). It can be concluded that the limitations of using drawdown type curves for analyzing pressure buildup data where producing time, tp, is small, are especially important in the following situations: (a) for this producing time range the difference between (Ap)d~wdow, and (Ap)buitd,p is significant and gets smaller as producing time, tp, increases; and (b) for long shut-in times, At, the difference between the (Ap)'s gets larger. The basis of Agarwal's (1980) method is Eq. 6-78. Substituting the line source solution into this equation, and considering the skin effect, the following expression is obtained:
k h [ P w s ( t + A t ) - P w s ( A t = O ) ] l l t p D A t pIn ~ aoqB p 2 ( t + At)
+ 0.80907 ]
(6-83)
Agarwal (1980) demonstrated that this pressure buildup solution gives essentially the same results as those generated by the drawdown solution. Furthermore, it is possible to normalize a family of buildup curves into a single curve, which is as
614
UCING
TIME,t or At Fig. 6-52. Comparison of drawdown and buildup pressure drop behavior vs. shut-in time, for different producing times. mentioned, practically coincident with the drawdown curve. In conclusion, if pressure buildup data are to be analyzed by pressure drawdown type curves, then (Ap)buitdup data should be graphed as a function of a new time group At e = tp At / (tp + At) rather than just the shut-in time, At. The utilization of this group was successfully tested for different conditions, such as the presence of skin and wellbore storage, applicability to the type curves of Earlougher and Kersch (1974) and Gringarten et al. (1979), tworate testing, multiple rate testing, and in fractured wells. This method has the implicit assumption that producing time tp was long enough for the radical flow semilog straight line to be reached prior to shut-in of the well. Besides its use for type curve analysis, Agarwal's (1980) equivalent drawdown time, At e, is also useful in the semilog analysis of pressure buildup data. In dimensional form, Eq. 6-83 can be written as follows:
Pw, ( t + At)-Pw~ (At = O)= m
+ log
(4b,/ 7~
+ 0.86859 s
1
log
P tP + At
+ log (DI2err2w
(6-84)
615 This expression suggests that a graph of buildup pressure, Pw~ o r (Ap)buildup VS. Ate, should show a straight line portion of slope m on semi-log paper. This graph in terms of At is similar to the Homer graph, because it also accounts for the effect of producing time t.e This equation also indicates that for long producing times as compared with the shut-in time At, when (t. + At) / t ~ 1, then At ~ At. This expression justifies the use of the Miller-Dyes-Hutc~ainson graph p for long eproducing times. Similar to conventional analysis techniques, skin effects may be estimated through the following expression: s = 1.115131Pw~ (At = 1)-Pws(Atm = O)
Ikll -
log
-
Cpctr:
log
4
(6-85)
w
It can easily be demonstrated that the false pressure p*, corresponding to shut-in time At close to infinity, or the initial pressure,p~, can be directly read from the straight line portion of the semi-log graph Of Pw~ vs. Ate, if the Ate value equals to t.p P R E S S U R E T R A N S I E N T ANALYSIS F O R H I G H - P E R M E A B I L I T Y R E S E R V O I R S
It is well known that many carbonate reservoirs are high-permeability formations (Mclntosh et al., 1979; Kabir and Willmon, 1981; Cinco Ley et al., 1985). These systems show special characteristics that makes the application of conventional techniques of analysis difficult. For instance, in very high-permeability reservoirs, inertial effects appear to be important, because of high flow rates involved in tests. Furthermore, wellbore temperature effects and interference of neighboring wells produce pressure changes at the tested well, which are of the same order of magnitude as pressure changes generated by variations in flow rate in the test itself. This situation requires that the effects of different phenomena be detected and evaluated in order to perform comprehensive analyses. The discussion that follows will focus on the presentation of field cases. The reservoirs tested are in calcareous rocks of Cretaceous age, and all are highly fractured and include vugs and cavems. These characteristics provide good formation flow conductivity (kh), yielding high flow rates (20,000- 40,000 STB/D) during the first years of production. At the time these tests were conducted, the reservoirs were undersaturated.
Example 6-3. Pressure and flow test in oil well A-1 (Cinco-Ley et al., 1983) Well A-1 is an offshore openhole completion (Fig. 6-53). Figure 6-54 shows the tests carried out in February 1980, starting with a drawdown test followed by a buildup test. Next, the well was open through three different choke sizes for a period of half an hour each and, finally, it was shut-in for a second pressure buildup test of 16.5 hr duration. Figure 6-55 presents pressure data registered during the test. These results indicate that inertia effects strongly affected the pressure response of the well, both drawdown and buildup tests showing water-hammer effects. It is important to point out that
616
]
CASE A
PRESSURE GAUGE AT I170 m
1240 m 3PEN HOLE ,273 m Fig. 6-53. Completions details of well A.
these were the first tests conducted in this high-permeability prolific field and, consequently, the water-hammer effect had not been previously identified. In the analysis of the pressure-flow rate data obtained for this well, two types of tests can be considered: (a) a variable flow-rate test including the first flow period, the first shut-in period and subsequent flow periods through three different choke sizes; and (b) another test that includes the second buildup period.
Variable flow rate test The first flow period of this test can be considered a constant-rate drawdown test. Table 6-XIII shows the reservoir and fluid data for this well and also for wells B-1 and B-2 (discussed later). Figure 6-56 presents a semilog graph of the pressure data for the first flow period, which shows a straight line of slope 0.25 psi/cycle, resulting in a conductivity kh = 19.2 x 106 mD-ft and s z 3.5. Assuming radial flow conditions, Fig. 6-57 shows a multiple-rate data graph for this test. It can be observed that the slope of these four graphs, is approximately 0.23 psi/cycle found in the constant-rate semilog graph of Fig. 6-56, but the straight lines are displaced due to the friction losses which, for all conditions remaining constant, depend on flow rate. Using the approximately "stabilized" pressure information of Fig. 6-57 and the rate data of Fig. 6-54, Fig. 6-58 shows a graph of Ap / q vs. q. It can be observed that
617
CASE A
q,STB/D 7 430 5:500 6740 8980
q STB/D
lO,O00
4
,IF
_z
0
I
0
|
2
4
I
I
6 t, hours
8
I
I
10
Fig. 6-54. Variation of flow rate vs. time during the tests in well A. TABLE 6-XIII Reservoir and fluid data Well A- 1
Bubble point pressure, psi System total compressibility, psi -l Oil viscosity, cP Formation volume factor, RB/STB Well radius, ft Porosity, fraction Type of completion
2133 3 x 10-5 3 1.22 0.4 0.12 openhole
Wells B-1 and B-2
Bubble point pressure, psi System total compressibility, psi -t Oil viscosity, cP Formation volume factor, RB/STB Well radius, ft Porosity, fraction Type of completion of well B-1 Type of completion of well B-2
2532.8 1.7• 10-5 0.532 1.5 0.5 0.06 openhole perforated single completion
the data do n o t f o l l o w a h o r i z o n t a l straight line, thus i n d i c a t i n g h i g h - v e l o c i t y f l o w in the f l o w s y s t e m .
618
CASE A 2420
Pw ,psi
D
2415
,,i
I
I
I
I
I
i
,
i
5
i
I
I
10
15
t, hours Fig. 6-55. Pressure response for tests in well A.
"
IIl~
CASE A
2420
Pwf, psi
9
o D
9
9
s,"
%
9
s
~ 9 9
t I. m_0.25
psi
~,
cycle
0O
2415
r
0-2
I
10-1
I
1
I
,
10
t, min Fig. 6-56. Semilog graph for the first drawdown test data, well A.
I
102
103
619
CASE A m- 0.4 x 10-4
6 AP w qN 4 psi STB/D x104
& a
q,STBID 7430 5300 o 6740
I
9 8980
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
n qj-qj-I ~l
0.2
0
log (t-t].])
qN
Fig. 6-57. Multiple flow rate test graph, well A.
10
I
I
!
I
I
A p / q : 3.017 x 10 - 4 + 6.283 x 10 . 8 q m
ra
Ap = 3.017 x 10 -4 q , 6 .
rn
~-
O9
8
o/~
(tJ C~_
m =6.283 xt0 -8
o,.
1:9"
Y0: 3.017 x 10-4 psi / STB / D 5
I Z
000
I
I
6 000
q (STB/D) Fig. 6-58. Well performance curve for well A.
1
8 000
I
10 000
0.4
620
CASE A oo
2420
9 --o" ~ 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9 9
9 9
9 Oo
PWS,
psi iI
2410
i
0
I
I
1
2
,
I
I
,
5
4
5
At,min Fig. 6-59. Cartesian graph of the first five minutes of the buildup pressure response data, well A.
The best-fitted straight line of the data gives an interception at q = 0 of 3.017 • 10-4 psi/B/D, the inverse being the productivity index equal to 3,315 STB/D/psi.
Second buildup test The second buildup test includes two shut-in periods. However, the first test did not last long enough for the inertia and fluid segregation effects to become negligible, and, therefore, allow the recognition of analyzable data. The early-time data of the second buildup test were also under the influence of inertia and fluid segregation effects during the first 45 minutes. Figure 6-59 shows the pressure behavior of the well for the first 5 minutes, indicating a water-hammer effect with an initial 24-second cycle, which tends to dampen as a result of several factors, among them frictional forces. The water-hammer effect is the result of the sudden surface valve shut-in. As a final comment, it is useful to say that the experience gained through this test was used to improve the design of subsequent tests in the area. For instance, the inertia effects could be minimized by slowly opening or closing the surface valves. Longer test times were recommended in order to obtain more complete data for a proper analysis. In addition, design of future tests called for an accurate definition of pressure decline in the volume of drainage of the well before the start of the test. This aspect of test design was not quite important at the time the test was carried out, because this giant field was at the initial stage of development.
621
Example 6-4. Pressure drawdown and buildup test in oil well B-1 (Cinco-Ley et al., 1985) Well B-1 is an offshore openhole completion (Fig. 6-60). The producing formation is a Paleocene breccia in Cretaceous age rocks. At the time this test was conducted, the reservoir was undersaturated. Figure 6-61 shows the pressure variation during two drawdown and buildup tests carried out in August 1984. These tests started under shut-in conditions of the well so as to obtain measurement of pressure decline in the volume of drainage before the beginning of the test. Actually, for this test rather than dealing with a pressure decline, the field was under a pressure recovery because of a decrease in production rate of about 150,000 STB/D. Once this pressure recovery tendency was accurately defined, two drawdown tests followed by their corresponding pressure buildup tests were carried out. Both pressure and flow rate measurements were taken simultaneously and recorded at the surface. A quartz crystal recorder and a spinner were located at a depth of 3200 m. Unfortunately, flow rate data were not recorded because a fragment of rock from the producing formation prevented proper operation of the spinner. An average flow rate of 23,000 STB/D was handled during the test. Before every drawdown test, the gas column within the wellbore was purged to minimize inertial
CASE B-I
200 m
~
3779 m
Fig. 6-60. Completion details of well B 1.
622 3950
I
CASE B-1 r .~_..._ _
3900I
1
3850n itl r
k,..,__J
3800
~lllll~lllllll~ I
::D 03 t..tJ or" n
3750-~
!
9 IL--
J
3700 ,L I
.L
3650
3600-
~j i
0
20
40
60
8O
100
120
TI ME, HR Fig. 6-61. Pressure response for the tests in well B 1.
effects when the well was subsequently fully opened. The reliability of the drawdown test is limited because: (a) the pressure noise was of the order of the pressure variation during the test; and (b) of difficulties in the continuous flow rate measurements. Due to the location of the pressure recorder (463 m above the top of the producing interval), it was necessary to correct the bottomhole flowing pressure by adding the fluid column pressure difference plus frictional pressure losses. To make this possible, the pressure recorder was lifted 200 m right before the second buildup test so as to calculate the pressure gradient under flowing conditions. The results of the first pressure buildup test are shown in Fig. 6-62. Inertial oscillations are present at short shut-in times as was discussed for the test of Example 6-3. Analysis of the test indicates that apparent semilog straight lines are exhibited and explained by the double-porosity behavior. However, this situation could be erroneous in this type of field because similar behavior can be caused by rate variation in neighboring wells. A confident analysis of the buildup test can be obtained when both test results are analyzed simultaneously. Comparison of the Homer graphs for the first and second
623
CASE B-I 3924
Pw$ psia 5922
,%
3920
m o o
9
9
9
9
9
9 9 9
-o
9 9 9
~t
10-3
i
,
i
10-2
10-1
At
tp+At Fig. 6-62. Homer graph for the first buildup test, well B 1.
buildups (Figs. 6-62 and 6-63, respectively) indicates that the double porosity-like behavior of the first test does not represent the reservoir characteristics. Instead, it was caused by neighboring well effects. The period oscillations for both tests are identical; however, the oscillation amplitudes for the second buildup results (pressure recorded at lower depth) are higher than those observed in the first buildup. This situation can be explained by considering that the oscillation amplitude is related to frictional effects. The correct semilog straight line appears to be better defined in the second buildup test and has a slope of 1.46 psi/cycle (Fig. 6-63). According to data presented in Table 6-XIII for this well, the formation flow conductivity is 2.12 • 106 mD-ft. The pressure at At equal to 1.0 hr on the semilog straight line is 3736.75 psi. After correcting the measured bottomhole flowing pressure for the friction pressure drop, calculation of the skin effect gives a value of 16.7. Based on geological and geophysical information, it is believed that this skin value is due to the partial penetration condition of the well. Finally, Fig. 6-63 clearly shows that the final portion of the test was under the influence of the reservoir pressure trend.
Example 6-5. Pressure drawdown and buildup tests in oil well B-2 (Cinco Ley et al., 1985) This well was tested by using a bottomhole shut-in tool with simultaneous pressure recording at the surface. Both devices were installed as part of the production string. Figure 6-64 shows the pressure recorded for this well. Initially there was an observation
624
CASE B-1
3738
Pws, psia 3736
-oo 9
9
9~ ,,.It
9
oo 9
9
9
9
9 9
9
|
9 9 9 9 9
9
3734
3732
.
.
.
.
.
10-3
J lO-a
i
10-]
At tp+At
Fig. 6-63. Homer graph for the second buildup test, well B 1.
4140
o
CASE B-2
4155
DD
13_
DD
oo rr- 4150 1:3_ OBS DD BU 4125
I
24
I
I
Observation Drawd0wn Buildup ,
72
48
TIME, Hours Fig. 6-64. Pressure response for the tests in well B2.
I
96
12o
625 period to determine pressure variation at the wellbore, and next, the well was opened for a drawdown test followed by a buildup period. Finally, another drawdown and a buildup completed the test sequence. Figure 6-64 shows that the whole test sequence was under the influence of a changing reservoir pressure trend. However, the pressure trend is approximately linear for each particular test. It has been demonstrated that for a drawdown test under the influence of linear reservoir pressure trend, m* can be interpreted through equation A-4 of Cinco Ley et al. (1985):
t dApwl dt
-
m + m*t 2.303
(6-86)
This equation indicates that a graph of MAp wl/ dt vs. t, as shown in Fig. 6-65, yields a straight line whose slope is m* and intercept is m/2.303, where m is the semilog straight line slope. Thus, this method allows the simultaneous estimation of reservoir decline pressure trend m* and the semilog straight line m. On the other hand, a pressure buildup test under the influence of linear reservoir linear pressure trend m* can be analyzed through equation A-6 of Cinco Ley et al. (1985):
t dAPws dAt
m t = --P - m* 2.303 At ( t + At)
(6-87)
Drawdown Test
/ t
/
/
dAp /
dt
]
m / 2.303
TIME dAPwf
Fig. 6-65. Graph of the pressure derivative function t dt of an unknown linear pressure trend.
vs. t for a drawdown test under the influence
626
Buildup Test dAPws dAt m/2.303
m-~ i
tp (tp + At )At Fig. 6-66. Graph of the pressure derivative dAPws / dAt vs. tp / At(tp + At) for a buildup test under the influence of an unknown linear pressure trend. This equation shows that a graph ofdAPws/dAt vs. t / A t (t~ + At), as shown in Fig. 666, yields a straight line whose slope is m/2.303 ~nd intercept is m*. It should be mentioned that this method does not require the use of the desuperposition (negative superposition) suggested by Slider (1971). These methods of analysis are appropriate for the cases discussed in this section. Unfortunately, data of continuous flow rate measurements are not available. Hence, a reliable analysis of the drawdown test cannot be provided. It should be mentioned that the well was opened at the surface, and pressure data exhibited rather irregular behavior as a result of flow rate variations. The average flow rate used in these tests was 5,400 STB/D according to specifications of shut-in tool, and the pressure recorder was a high-resolution strain gauge (0.01 psi). Figure 6-67 is a Homer graph for the first buildup test. Note that this test was not under the influence of a reservoir pressure trend alone. Additionally, non-programmed changes in the production rate of some neighboring wells had to be made due to failure of production facilities. The shut-in pressure at the final portion of the buildup shows a decline resulting from pressure trend effects. Figure 6-68 presents a graph plotted in accordance with the method previously discussed, applied to the first buildup test. Data are rather scattered, and a smoothing process becomes necessary before calculating pressure derivatives. A simple method that produces excellent results for such a smoothing process is based on the equation:
627 4159
CASE B- 2 Pws, psia
.,/~
oe
9
~~176
4158 .. 9
9
o
9 ~
~
/
-.--t%
9 9
O ~
9
9
/
9O
".%j
4157
1
10-5
10-4
I
I
10-5
10-2
,
1
10-I
&t tp+&t Fig. 6-67. Homer graph for the first buildup test, well B2. 'A t + 8 t / 2
fiw~(At)
=
t-6,/2
Pws(tldt
(6-88)
or in discretized form for equally-spaced points: n-1
1
P---w~i -
n
(-7-)
Z Pw,(i+j)
(6-89)
j = -(~)
where n is an odd number. It has been found, for the cases presented in this work, that n = 11 produces satisfactory results, as seen in Fig. 6-69. Results are not reliable because field pressure trend changed during the test. Figure 6-70 is a Homer graph for the second buildup test; the effect of reservoir pressure trend is evident at long shut-in times. No apparent semilog straight line seems to be present. Figure 6-71 shows the application of the method previously described that considers a pressure decline, applied to the test after pressure data smoothing. The straight-line portion of the curve has a slope of 0.812 and intercept of -0.14. These data mean that the reservoir pressure trend during the test was -0.14 psi/ hour, and the slope of the semilog straight line is 1.87 psi/cycle, which produces a kh value of 3.7 x 105 mD-ft.
628
0.5
CASE B-2
dAPws
dAt
psi 0
~ ' ~ r
-0.5
, 0
9
. . I 0.2
.., . . . . .
o
I 0.4
oo
9
,
J 0.6
tp
(tp,At)At
I
1
0.8
, hr - I
Fig. 6-68. Graph of the pressure derivativedApws/dAtvs, tp / At(tp + At) for the first buildup test, well B2. 0.5
9'
CASE
d~pws dAt
-
psi
~;
B-2
m
~~- 9149
9149 99 00
O
~
9
9
9
9
o
-O.5~
. L , 0
! 0.2
A
I 0.4
( tp+
I
t p At ) At
! 0.6 t
l
,,I,, 0.8
I
hr_l
Fig. 6-69. Graph o f the pressure derivative dApws / dAt vs. tp / At(tp + At) obtained through an l 1-point smoothing process; first buildup test; well B2.
629
4138
CASE B-2 4157
Pws,psia ...............
4136
4135
4154
I
10-5
I
10-4
,
I
10-3
I
10-2
10-1
At
tp. At Fig. 6-70. Homer graph for the second buildup test, well B2.
0.5
CASE B- 2
dA Pwsld~,t. psilhr
2.505 - 0.812
j
. . . . . .
0 0 0 O0 9 0
9
9
9
m - o.14 psi/hour
-0.5
J
0
I
0.2
I
I
i
0.4
I
,
0.6 t p
(tp+ht) At
I
0.8
,
]
! hr_ ]
Fig. 6-71. Graph of the pressure derivative dApw s / dAt vs. tp / At(tp + At) obtained through an 11-point smoothing process; second buildup test; well B2.
630 In addition, the Homer graph corrected for pressure trend can be obtained by using the principle of superposition, that is (Cinco Ley et al., 1985): (6-90)
(Pws(AO)corrected--Pws (AO "l- m* At
In Figure 6-72 one can detect the semilog straight line at the final portion of the test. An important point in this test was to determine if the reservoir exhibits doubleporosity behavior, which becomes evident in the corrected Homer graph. Methods available for double-porosity analysis can be applied to the corrected data. It should be pointed out that the bottomhole shut-in tool was effective in eliminating wellbore storage and inertial effects. The shut-in pressure increases abruptly after closing the well. However, abnormal behavior occurs after 1.8 minutes. It appears that the wellbore pressure decreases with time. This anomaly is readily explained by vertical movement of the pressure recorder caused by temperature changes in the wellbore after shut-in. The production string did in fact move freely through the packer and no attempt was made to correct for this effect. The cases described above were selected to illustrate different types of unusual behavior of the pressure recorded in tests of high-permeability reservoirs. It is stressed that the use of high-resolution pressure gauges is a must in order to obtain good information. The first case described above showed the effect of inertia and friction pressure drop on bottomhole pressure, when the pressure recorder was located inside the tubing. As was mentioned, small flow rates must be used to avoid lifting
4138
.
.
.
.
.
.
i
CASE B-2
!
4137
Pws,psia 41:56
.. ......... .-.-..~....,.,.~ J "
J'"
4135
4134 . . . . . . . . 10-5
I
10-4
I
I
10-3
10-2
A t / ( t o + 6t ) Fig. 6-72. Corrected Homer graph for the second buildup test, well B2.
,
I
10-]
631 of the pressure element which indeed can be a major problem in detecting the semilog straight line because of small pressure variation. This situation should be avoided in this type of reservoir. The second case pointed out that changes of flow rate in neighboring wells can completely distort the pressure behavior of the tested well, and any analysis performed is unreliable under such conditions. It is important to have strict control on the production conditions of the wells when a particular well is being tested, and tests should be planned to obtain repeatability in pressure behavior. The third case showed the advantage of using a bottomhole shut-in tool in this type of reservoir. Both inertial and wellbore storage effects are almost eliminated under these conditions, but one should be aware of the possibility of having the pressure measurement affected by temperature changes if the pressure recorder is not anchored. Another point that deserves particular attention is the possibility of using the spinner to measure the flow rate continuously in order to analyze pressure drawdown data properly. The third case illustrated the application of a method of interpretation of data influenced by the reservoir pressure trend and a method for data smoothing.
A N A L Y S I S OF W E L L I N T E R F E R E N C E T E S T S
An interference test is a multiple-well transient test that involves more than one well. In an interference test, a long-duration rate or pressure change in one well, called an "active" well, creates a pressure interference in a previously-closed, nearby observation well. Such a pressure interference can be analyzed for reservoir properties. The term "interference test" refers to the pressure drop caused by the producing wells, including the active well, as the shut-in observation wells "interfere with" the pressure at the observation wells. There are several important advantages inherent in the analysis of interference tests. First, a greater area of the reservoir is influenced with respect to that affected during a single-well test, be that a drawdown or buildup test. Second, these tests can provide information on reservoir properties that are not available from single-well tests, e.g., the storativity ~ cth. Third, reservoir connectivity can be estimated. Questions such as: (a) is the nearby observation area drained by other wells? and if so, (b) how rapidly?, can be answered. Fourth, reservoir anisotropy, which can be directly related to preferential flow patterns, can be estimated. On the other hand, a disadvantage of this test is that pressure drops reaching the observation well or wells can be very small, and importantly, are affected by additional operational field producing variations. This problem is especially common in high-permeability carbonate reservoirs. However, presently available electronic gauges of high accuracy and resolution are capable of registering such small pressure drops (usually less than 1 psi over days or even weeks), and so interference testing can be successfully employed. Of special importance in new reservoirs, an interference test is not affected by other production in the field, and it serves to prove the presence of productive reservoir between the first two wells. The basic theory used in the analysis of interference tests is based on the flow of a constant-compressibility liquid, which is mathematically expressed by Eq.6-42. This
632 104
10 5
106
107
10 8
109
10 3
I04
10
PD
J
----/" 161
....
I0-z
I0-I
1
I0
0z
tD/rDz Fig. 6-73. The line-source solution type curve.
line source solution is quite useful for interference data analysis (Ramey et al., 1973; Earlougher et al., 1977; Economides and Ogbe, 1987). For interpretation purposes it is desirable to have a log-log graph of the line source solution, such as that illustrated in Fig. 6-73. Because both ordinate and abscissa dimensionless parameters are directly proportional to real variables (Ap and t), a field graph plotted on the same size log-log coordinates must appear very similar to this line source solution (shown in Fig 6-73). For instance, from the definition of dimensionless pressure given in Table 6-11, taking logarithms, one obtains: log Pz~ = log
kh(p i -p(r,t)) kh = log ~ + log(p/-p(r,t)) aoqBt.t aoqBp
(6-91)
It can be observed from the above expression that the first log term contains all constants, whereas the variable pressure drop is contained in the second term. A similar expression can be written starting from the definition of dimensionless time (Table 6-11). Thus, as already stated, a log-log graph of the real pressure drop Ap vs. time t must look like a log-log graph of dimensionless pressure pz~vs. dimensionless time to. Frequently, the starting point for an interference test is to open the active well, which causes a pressure drop at the observation well. Next, the active well is shutin, creating a second pressure drop at the observation well. Figure 6-74 reproduces the Ramey's (1980) type curve. The graph includes the drawdown line source solution of Fig. 6-73, followed by buildup interference behavior described by various deviations,
633 10 tpD/rDz DIM. PROD. TIME
PD
\
161
162 10-1
1
10 2
103
104
(tp + At)D Ir~ Fig. 6-74. Ramey's combineddrawdown/builduptype curve for radial flow interference tests. each one of them corresponding to a particular producing time. Thus, combined drawdown/buildup interference test data should follow one of these combinations. It can be observed from this graph that there are important differences in pressure behavior for small and large producing times, resulting in a marked increase in resolution and a substantial reduction of the uniqueness of the interpretation problem. The above discussion, with specific regard to the interpretation of interference tests, has considered a radial flow case. Other possibilities are linear and spherical flows. Guti6rrez (1984) and Guti6rrez and Cinco Ley (1985) have presented a unified theory of interpretation for interference tests which consider the three main flow types mentioned above. These authors have presented, similar to Fig. 6-74, combined drawdown/buildup solutions for linear and spherical flows. Figure 6-75 illustrates their results for the linear case. Figure 6-76 shows drawdown interference solutions for the three flow types considered by the authors (i.e., linear, radial and spherical). The abscissa F1(PD) and the ordinate F2(tD) correspond to the definitions of dimensionless pressure and time for the three flow types considered as defined in Table 6-II. Figure 6-76 shows that for small times, the different flow geometries exhibit essentially the same pressure drop, and as time increases, pressure behaviors differ from each other. For example, for large times the linear dimensionless pressure drop shows a log-log linear behavior with a slope of 0.5, whereas spherical flow shows a constant pressure drop. In summary, Fig. 6-76 can be used as a type curve for the interpretation of drawdown interference tests, providing the information on the flow geometry prevailing during the test is given.
634
10 2 -
PDL_ k,bhAp 2XDL 2r B/~x tpD L /3kt p x--T=
10
(tp*At)D _ /3k(tp,At)
,~ x~ x
Od
ct ~---~---~
r
x2
I
..J C~
10-1
1
10
10 2
103
104
2
( tp + At )D I X o Fig. 6-75. Gutirrrez and Cinco Leys' combineddrawdown/builduptype curves for linear flow interference tests. (After Gutirrrez and Cinco Ley, 1985, fig. 5.)
Example 6-6. Transmissivity and diffusivity mapping from interference test data The information coming from a series of single-well tests (drawdowns and buildups) and of interference tests conducted in a heterogeneous, anisotropic reservoir was used to obtain a two-dimensional description of this system in terms of transmissivity and diffusivity (Najurieta et al., 1995). A mapping procedure was used to produce a regular mesh of grids from the scattered field information acquired from well testing. Two mapping methods were used during the study, and these gave similar results. The first calculates the minimal tension surface with a commercially available contouring program. A normal analysis was also used (Perez-Rosales, 1979). In the present example, a 4850 grid of points was calculated from the scattered data points. The final step was to interpolate between adjacent grid points and determine the contour lines. To obtain the desired property map, the following procedure can be used: (1) The area under study must be evaluated performing interference tests between adjacent wells. Each interference test must be analyzed to have a pair of apparent transmissivity and diffusivity values, which correspond to a specific measurement ellipse (area influenced during an interference test).
635 102
" Ji
10'.
1
.
.
J
LINEAR
.
/
"
lFi, ~
.
' RADIAL~
/
~
!
SPHERICAL FLOW
]d ~ I
I
1 I
ld a
#
I
10-1
1
10
102
103
104
F2 (to) Fig. 6-76. Drawdown interference-type curves for linear, radial, and spherical flows. (2) A scattered data set of each parameter is made by assigning calculated values to the corresponding measurement ellipses. The transmissivity map can be improved using data from single-well tests. In this case, transmissivity data are assigned to the corresponding measurement circle (area influenced during a single well test). (3) The high-to-low data exclusion rule is applied, in order to obtain the higher measured transmissivity and diffusivity in common regions. (4) Depending on the objectives of the mapping, transmissivity and diffusivity, values must be assigned to the external contour of the map by extrapolation to a weighted average of the measured values. Finally the map is calculated by means of the user's preferred method. In order to calculate higher resolution maps, it is recommended to design the test in such a way as to obtain narrow measurement ellipses between adjacent wells. The number of data points in each ellipse must be sufficient to ensure that the calculated surface fits the data. This number can be used to assign different statistical weights to each test, taking into account the data quality or input from other synergetic sources. An injection pilot test was carried out in the Abkatun field during 1986. To improve reservoir characterization, a series of interference tests were perfomed as shown by the arrows in Fig. 6-77. The interpretation of these tests was made in accordance with techniques already available in the literature (McKinley et al., 1968; Vela and
636
0
12
0
4
~
0
11-A
o 0
o
o5
84
Fig. 6-77. Interference tests carried out in the pilot injection project of the Abkatun field.
McKinley, 1970; Lescarboura et al., 1975; Ramey, 1975; Earlougher, 1977; Grader and Home, 1988) and were earlier reported by Najurieta et al. (1995). In the following example, a set of six transmissivity and diffusivity values shown in Table 6-XIV were used. The properties of the southem and western limits of the map were fixed using data obtained from other interference tests. The northern and eastern limits were established to constant values corresponding to the representative values of average field parameters. To enhance the preferential water injection TABLE 6 - X I V Transmissivity and diffussivity data of the Abkatun injection pilot test area Active well
Observation well
T [ m D - m / c P ] x 10-6
1/[cm 2 /sec] x 10-6
20 ll-A 43 62 64 43
4 20 20 20 20 62
1.2 0.803 0.0017 1.02 0.97 0.376
1.36 1.233 0.08 6.75 5.33 0.586
637 APPARENT DIFUSSIVITY (I0 A6 cmA2 / sec ) It
/
---- z
2132000
2131000
213oooo
2129000
2128000
2127000
584000
586000
588000
590000
Fig. 6-78.Apparent diffusivity map from the results of the interference test, Abkatun field. (After Najurieta et al., 1995, fig. 9, p. 183.)
APPARENT TRANSMISSIVITY[10^6 md-m/cp] 2133000
X
14
2132000
2131000
2130000
2129000
2128000
2127000
2126000 584000
586000
588000
590000
Fig. 6-79. Apparent transmissivity map from the results of the interference tests, Abkatun field. (After Najurieta et al., 1995, fig. 10, p. 183.)
638 flow in the reservoir, early-time transmissivity and diffusivity data were used as input in the scattered data input map, thus producing narrow-measuring ellipses. A total of 137 scattered data points were used in the mapping process in this example. The results are shown in Figs. 6-78 and 6-79. A preferential permeability trend can be seen from well 62 to well 20, and a low-diffusivity, low-permeability zone appears in the northeast. Permeability and porosity maps calculated from the diffusivity and transmissivity distributions were used as a convenient input to a bidimensional, two-phase numerical simulation of the pilot test previously discussed.
DETERMINATION OF THE PRESSURE-DEPENDENT CHARACTERISTICS OF A RESERVOIR
It has long been recognized that porous media are not always rigid and nondeformable (Meinzer, 1928; Jacob, 1940). This problem is usually handled by means of properly chosen "average" properties. This method only reduces the errors involved and generally does not totally eliminate them. A review of the literature indicates that most of the effort toward the solution of this pressure-dependent flow problem, has been focused on the direct problem (i.e., predicting the pressure behavior of the reservoir from knowledge of pertinent reservoir parameters). Raghavan et al. (1972) derived a flow equation considering that rock and fluid properties vary with pressure. This equation, when expressed as a function of a pseudopressurep.(p), resembles the diffusivity equation. Samaniego and Cinco (1989) have presented a s~olution for the inverse problem (i.e., identifying a pressure-dependent reservoir from test data, and evaluating reservoir parameters). In order to properly predict reservoir behavior, it is important to identify the pressure-dependent characteristics of the reservoir early in its life. The method of these authors is based on the analysis of drawdown and buildup tests, both for oil and gas wells. It allows the estimation of the pressure-dependent characteristics of the reservoir in terms of k(p) / (1 - ~ (p)), or if porosity is considered constant in terms of permeability. The basic case for drawdown testing is that of constant rock-face mass flow rate in a radial system. It has been demonstrated (Samaniego, 1974; Samaniego et al., 1977) that the transient well behavior for flow in a pressure-dependent system can be expressed, for all practical purposes, by: 1
PPD(l'to) = -~--(ln to + 0.80907)
(6-92)
where po and ppo are the definitions for the dimensionless time and pseudopressure, respectively given by Eqs. 6-93 and 6-94: to =
flk(Pi)t
r
(p)c,
(6-93) w
639
PPD (rD,tD) =
h(p,) {1 - ~b(p,)} {pp(pi)-pp(r,t)} (6-94)
ao qi P (Pi)
and r o (Table 6-II) and p.(p) are the dimensionless distance and pseudopressure, respectively, the latter defi~ed by Eq. 6-95: ,~
k(p) p (p)
PP(P) = Po { 1 -
~
(p) } p (p) dp
(6-95)
It has been found convenient (Samaniego, 1974; Samaniego et al., 1977) to express Eq. 6-95 in terms of a normalized pseudopressure p~p(p) defined by:
1 G(p)
{1 - ~ (p,)} ~, (p)
k(p,) p (p,)
=
pp(p)
(6-96)
Then, Eq. 6-92 can be written as:
P~ (Pwl)
+ log
=
pip(p)_ 1.1513ao
71
qi P ~i)
log
k~i)h(Pi)
~)(Pi)P (p,)c,(p)r2w
+ 0.86859 s
(6-97)
The slope m of the semilog straight line is defined as:
m =
OPlp (Pwf) -
1.513a
9 log t
q i ].1 (P i)
o k(Pi)h(Pi)
(6-98)
This slope can be re-written as:
dP~p(Pw/) 8Pw/
@w:
_
1.513a
o tog t
qi P (Pi) o k(p,)h(p,)
(6-99)
Deriving the definition of the normalized pseudopressure given by Eq. 6-96 yields:
@~' (pw:) _ {1 - O(p,)} u(p).
Op w/
k(p,) p (pi)
k(pw:)P (Pw:)
{ 1 - r (Pw:)} P (Pw:)
(6-100)
640 Substituting Eq. 6-100 into Eq. 6-99 yields:
k(Pwf)
-1.1513a o
9~ (,pwl) 9
q i P (Pi)
h(Pi):l-qb(Pwl)}
:l-~b(Pw:)}
1
P(,Pw:)(OPw~) ~
(6-101)
log t
Equation 6-101 is the expression that allows estimation of the pressure-dependent parameter k(p w/.) / {1 -~b ( pw/) } at any flowing time " It is assumed in this equation that the thickness h~pi ) and porosity ~b(pw l ) may be estimated from other sources (e " q," well logging). It has been demonstrated that currently available techniques provide accurate estimates of these parameters (Martell, 1989). In this expression and in all similar expressions in this section, the derivative c ~ w / ) / 0 log t is an instantaneous derivative (slope), at the time (or pressure) at which the pressure-dependent parameter is evaluated. Data on the pressure dependency of porosity indicate that, in most cases, its variation is small when compared to corresponding changes of permeability. Then, neglecting the dependence of porosity on pressure, Eq. 6-101 can be written as:
k(pws) = -1.1513ao
qi P(P)
~(Pwj)
1
(6-102)
c3log t Similarly, for a pressure buildup test in a pressure-dependent system, the necessary equation for analysis can be derived as previously described for drawdown tests. Again, if the pressure dependence of porosity is neglected then:
k~w~) = -1.1513a ~
qi P(Pi )
~(Pws)
h
p(pw)
1
(6-103)
~ Pws
+ At. O log (tp At ) An example of application of this method to simulated transient pressure data has been presented by the authors. It has been demonstrated that problems arise in the application of the proposed method at short times, because of the influence of effects such as wellbore storage and wellbore damage. In this respect, it is important to keep in mind that drawdown and buildup results are complementary (Serra et al., 1987). Drawdown analysis yields good estimates of the pressure-dependent parameter (k(p) / {1 - q~(p)} or k(p) at low values of pressure, and the buildup analysis yields good estimates of the parameter at high values of pressure. Consequently, by combining drawdown and buildup test results, one can obtain a good definition of the pressure-dependent parameter. The best way to obtain the stress-sensitive characteristics of the reservoir is to perform a drawdown
641 test at a high rate, one that results in an important pressure decrement, which then allows the estimation of the pressure-dependent parameter in a wide range of pressure. Once this test is concluded, it is recommended to carry out a buildup test to complement the drawdown results. Another way to circumvent this problem of estimation of the pressure-dependent parameter at early times during a test, due to the influence of wellbore storage and damage, is to apply the methods of "convolution" analysis to be discussed later. Such analysis makes use of rock-face rate measurements.
ANALYSIS OF VARIABLE FLOW RATE USING SUPERPOSITION, CONVOLUTION AND DECONVOLUTION (DESUPERPOSITION)
The analysis of a well test under variable rate contributes much information about the reservoir. This matter is strictly related to the "black box" problem discussed elsewhere (Gringarten, 1982; Aziz, 1989), which is gradually overcome as the "input" (rate) variation increases. The main difficulty with variable rate analysis is that it is no longer possible to perform a flow diagnosis by examining standard graphs because the usual characteristics may not appear. Thus, for flow diagnosis purposes, a process of desuperposition has to be used to calculate pressure response if the rate had been constant. This response has also been referred to as the "influence function" (Coats et al., 1964; Jargon and van Poollen, 1965). Figure 6-80 illustrates the constantrate pressure representation of variable rate test data. Next, a pressure drawdown test is considered under variable flow rate conditions (Fig. 6-81), where the flowing bottomhole pressure is a function of both flow rate and time. As mentioned before, the original theory for interpretation assumes constant flow rate conditions; hence, it is necessary to take into consideration the variation of the flow rate. Using the principle of superposition, an expression for the pressure drop APw(t) = Pi-Pw: (t) can be written as:
t
l
[I
v
Fig. 6-80. Constant-rate pressure representation of a variable rate test data. (After Home, 1990, fig. 3.25, p. fig. 63.)
642
Pi
wf
TIME Fig. 6-81. Variable flow rate test. N
Ap(t) = E
(qi - q i - , ) A p , (t --
t~_,)
(6-104)
i=l
where N is the number of flow rates for time t, and Apl(t) is the influence function (Coats et al., 1964), or in other words, is a unit flow rate pressure response. Multiplying and dividing by the time increment, At, and if N in this step-wise approximation goes to infinity (N --~ oo) and At likewise goes to 0 (At --~ 0), then one obtains:
APw(t) = f 'o 0q(r r) APl(t "c)d'r -
-
(6-105)
where ~ is a variable of integration. This integral given by Eq. 6-105 is known under several names: superposition integral, convolution integral, and the Duhamel principle. Generally speaking, the methods of interpretation for a test with variable rate involve a correction of pressure (Fig. 6-82) or/and a correction of the time scale (Fig. 683). Both types of corrections are based on the principle of superposition and can be referred to as deconvolution and convolution, respectively. This convolution integral is the basis of the method of calculating the variable rate from the constant rate response (Home, 1992). Deconvolution is the process of determining the influence function from the variable rate pressure response, APw(t), and the data about the rate variation, q(t). Deconvolution does not assume the flow model, whereas convolution is a method based on a predefined reservoir model.
643
Pi (AP)corr (AP)corr
Pwf
Pwfq
0 TIME Fig. 6-82. Pressure correction for variable rate.
Pi
/~(At)corr
(Pwf)q
Pwf
TIME Fig. 6-83. Time correction for variable rate.
644 Excellent papers have been published in recent years dealing with these two methods of deconvolution and convolution (Jargon and van Poollen, 1965; Bostic et al., 1980; Pascal, 1981; Kuchuk and Ayesteran, 1985; Meunier et al., 1985; Kuchuk, 1990; Simmons, 1990; Home, 1992). The writers will briefly describe the procedure presented by Home (1992) to solve the deconvolution problem. First, Eq. 6-105 is written in dimensionless form (Table 6-II):
p~(t~)
=
f
l~ 89
Ap,D(tD- v)dv
(6-106)
Taking the Laplace transform of Eq. 6-106 (van Everdingen and Hurst, 1949) tums the convolution integral into a simple multiplication:
p~ (s) = s ~-~(s) A~,~ (s)
(6-107)
The Laplace transform of the unit flow rate solution can be obtained from the previous variable rate solution:
SAp~D (S) =
s ~ (s) s~(s)
(6-108)
The inversion to real time can be done using the Stehfest (1970) inversion algorithm. It has been pointed out (Kuchuk, 1990; Bourgeois and Home, 1992) that this technique based on Laplace space deconvolution, expressed by Eq. 6-108, is often unstable at early time because the variable flow rate due to wellbore storage gives the following deconvolution equation:
S~ S A P ,D (S) =
(S)
- c~ s ~
(s)
- s
(6-109)
For the wellbore storage dominated period, fiwDis given by"
P~o (S) -
(6-11 O) S~C~
resulting in the denominator of Eq. 6-109 being zero, or oscillates around zero due to computation inaccuracies. The solution found by the authors is to add a small amount of wellbore storage CrD to stabilize the deconvolution of Eqs. 6-108 or 6-109"
Spwo (S) S@,~ (S)
=
- =
S ~ (S) + CrD$2
(6-111)
Kuchuk (1990) presented two well test examples which he refered to as "well-run field experiments compared with well tests we usually encounter". This comment
645 goes along with the conclusions of Sabet (1991) that deconvolution, although theoretically grounded, is about to become practical with present-day technology. Fair and Simmons (1992) reached similar conclusions, mainly, that deconvolution depends on extreme accuracy of rate measurement. They showed two examples, proving that small errors in the rate data may significantly alter the deconvolved response. One of these examples is taken from the paper of Meunier et al. (1985), showing that measured pressure data and deconvolved results using measured rate differ substantially. Example A in the paper by Kuchuk (1990) is analyzed by Bourgeois and Home (1991) using the Laplace transform technique previously outlined, and the results are also included in the work of Home (1992). Going back to Figs. 6-82 and 6-83, it can be stated that in cases where there is a skin effect, a correction is necessary in both pressure and time. It can be demonstrated that the influence function Ape(t) involved in Eq. 6-105 for infinite-acting radial flow conditions can be expressed, for units of the English system: APl (t) = 162.6
ooB Elog t + log kh
k
~ l.t c r 2 - 3.2275 + 0.86859 s w
(6-112)
For this case, in accordance with Eq. 6-104, Fig. 6-84 can be used to estimate the reservoir parameters and well condition (damage). As stated in previous comments, the influence function ZlP l(t ) depends on the reservoir flow model, that is, it is represented by the main terms t, t 1/4, t 1/2, and 1 / t 1/2 for radial, bilinear, linear and spherical
Z
{z~r
|
1
v
I
|
i
N ( q -i q ) i-i .Z
t:t
qN
Ap I ( t - t
i-i )
Fig. 6-84. Cartesian graph of the normalized pressure drop [pi-Pwf(t)] / qNVS. ~ [qi--qi-l) / qN] APi (t--
ti_l).
646
Pi Pw Pwf
/ Pws
Pwf&t: 0
-
~
At
i
t
P
TIME
Fig. 6-85. Pressure buildup for constant rate.
flows, respectively. In a more general way, the influence function APl(t) can be represented by a Pz~-tD relationship corresponding to a given reservoir system. The pressure buildup test is the most frequently used test because bottomhole pressure theoretically is measured under constant flow rate (q = 0) conditions (Fig. 6-85). It can be shown (Cinco Ley et al., 1989) that, for a buildup test: (1) the early shut-in time pressure data are dominated by the last flow rate; (2) the middle time data depend on both flow rate variation and producing time; and (3) the long time data depend exclusively on cumulative production during the flowing period (Fig. 6-86). Hence, the flow rate history before the shut-in should be known for a proper analysis. Conventional methods of interpretation (Homer and M-D-H plots) assume that the flow rate before shut-in is constant, and that the flow regime exhibited by the reservoir system is radial. For an infinite-acting reservoir, the M-D-H plot method produces a straight line in a graph Of Pws vs. log t at the beginning of the test. However, the data deviate because this technique does not take into account the effect of producing time (Fig. 6-87). The Homer plot method considers the effect of tP in such a way that a graph OfPw~vs. log At / ( t + At) produces a straight line that goes through all of the data free of wellbore storage effects. In other words, the Homer time includes a "correction" for the producing time effect. Other types of graphs also have been used to consider flow regimes other than radial, such as Pw~ vs. [(t + At) 1/2(At)l/2] ' Pw~ vs. [(t + At) '/4- (At)'/4], and Pws vs. [(At) -1/2- ( t + At)-'/2], for linear,
647
Pi
f(Q)
f(q,tp)
Pw
f ( q last) '
q(t)
--"
| Pwf
A
At=-2tp
t 2tp
o
t TIME
Fig. 6-86. Pressure buildup for variable rate and long shut-in time Pwfat At = O.
t cor r Horner M-D-H
Pws
log (6t) or log
[ At/Ctp
Fig. 6-87. A comparison of Homer and MDH graphs.
9L~t )]
648 bilinear and spherical flow, respectively. However, a flow-diagnostic process must be carried out for proper application of any of these types of graphs.
The superposition time graph For the case of variable flow rate before shut-in, buildup pressure can be expressed as"
tp Pws (At) =pi--lo q(v) Ap~ (tp + At- r) dr
(6-113)
where kp~ is the time derivative of the unit flow rate pressure response of the well-reservoir system. If the flow rate history is discretized, then Eq. 6-113 becomes: N
Pws (At) = P i - s
qi [AP l (tp d- A t - ti_l)- Ap, ( t + A t - ti) ]
(6-114)
i=l
This summation is called "superposition time function" tup and depends on the flow regime that dominates the pressure behavior of the system. Sometimes, summation of the superposition time includes the flow rate ratio qi / qN and the simplified form of the function Api, in such a way that Eq. 6-114 is given by: N
Pws (At) = Pi-- m (qN)
= ~ qi [g ( t Zil
+ At-- ti_l) -- g ( t + A t - tl) ]
(6-115)
where the function g is presented by the main terms already mentioned for different flow regimes that could prevail during a test. This equation shows that a graph Of Pws vs. the summation yields a straight line of slope--m(qN) and intercept Pi (Fig. 6-88). The slope is a function of the last flow rate qN and depends on reservoir parameters. The Homer method is a special case of this graph, that is, the superposition time reduces to the Homer time group when the flow is radial and the flow rate before shut-in is constant. Determination of the nature of the function g (i.e., log(t), t 1/2, t 1/4, U 1/2) requires a TABLE 6-XV Slope of the superposition time graph based on models
Model
mp D
Linear
aot"qNB pL kbh
Bilinear or radial
~,f=r, kh
Spherical
Or! qN
Bp
bf
aosphqNB p kr w
i
649
Pi
Pws
m
0 q i g ( t i ,At) Fig. 6-88. Superposition time graph.
flow diagnosis process through the first or second-derivative functions. The beginning and the end of the proper straight line can be found as shown in Fig. 6-89. On assuming that a flow j regime detected 9begins at time , t.. and ends at time t j, the ,oj . starting point of the straight-line portion m the superposmon time graph occurs at t p corresponding to At 9= t b j and ends at ts u p for tp + At = t e.j This last point will depend on both the flow rate history and the flow model exhibited by the reservoir. The superposition time can also be defined by using a P D - tD reservoir model (Fetkovich and Vienot, 1984)" N
Pw~ (At) = p,--mpD Z
qi [PD (tD + AtD--tDi-,)--PD (tD + AtD--tDi)]
(6-116)
i=l
where mpDc o m e s from the definition of PD (see Tables 6-II and 6-XV). The application of the superposition time graph requires a trial and error procedure to be able to identify the relationship between tD and t that produces a straight line. D r a w d o w n type c u r v e m a t c h i n g
The application of the type-curve analysis technique as a diagnostic process allows determination of the initial point of the semilog straight line and the detection of reservoir heterogeneities. Usually, drawdown type curves (pressure drop and time derivative of pressure) are used to analyze pressure buildup data, because of their
650
REGION OF VALIDITY OF THE SUPERPOSITION TIME GRAPH &t
&tej
&tbj J,
O
l
FLOW d
tbj
I
[tej
TIME SCALE FOR THE BEHAVIOR OF THE INFLUENCE FUNCTION 0
|
II
v
tp TIME
Fig. 6-89. Beginning and end of the straight line.
simplicity as compared to a buildup type curve which involves producing time as an additional parameter match. The application of drawdown type curves is valid under a certain condition, that is, the producing time must be large compared to the shut-in time ( t > l OAt). If this limitation is not satisfied, then data should be corrected. To match the drawdown type curves, a correction on the time scale can be made using the "effective time", At, as defined by Agarwal (1980), based on the radial flow equations that were previously discussed. This correction is similar to that involved in the Homer graph, and yields excellent results if the drawdown data before shut-in are free of wellbore storage, and the flow exhibited by the reservoir is radial. The effective time method can not be used for the pressure derivative analysis to correct the time scale. Another method used in the analysis of pressure buildup data to match the drawdown pressure drop type curves involves the desuperposition of the drawdown effects (Raghavan, 1980). This technique assumes constant flow rate during the producing period, and requires the initial and the bottomhole flowing pressures before shut-in. A proper application of some of the methods already discussed requires a diagnosis of the flow regimes exhibited by the reservoir during tests. The process becomes complex if the flow rate changes during the producing period. There are two techniques that allow identification of flow rates under these conditions: (a) the superposition time pressure derivative, and (b) the instantaneous source method.
651 Although the application of these techniques is well documented, there are some aspects related to the first method that deserve further consideration. The definition of the superposition time, as suggested by Bourdet et al. (1983, 1989), is based on radial flow equations and is given by"
tsup =
qN In "=
t
+At-it~l
(6-117)
p
Hence, the derivative of pressure with respect to tsup can be expressed as"
dPws dPw~
dAt
dtsup
zNq i { i=lqu
1
1
(6-118)
m
tp + A t - t .
l
tp + A t - t . t - I
At early shut-in times this equation becomes: dPws
dPws
-
dt sup
At~ dAt
(6-119)
Thus, as mentioned by Bourdet et al. (1983, 1989), the derivative of the shut-in pressure with respect to the superposition time approaches the first derivative function tAp'for pressure drawdown corresponding to the last flow rate. At large values of shut-in time Eq. 6-118 reduces to: dPws _ dtsup
qs (At)2 dPws 24 Q dAt
(6-120)
where Q is cumulative production during the flow period. According to the instantaneous source theory, the time derivative of the pressure buildup at long times is: dpws
n
dAt
24Q
d2Ap(qN)
qN
d(At) 2
(6-121)
where Ap(qN ) is pressure drawdown corresponding to rate qu" A combination of Eqs. 6-120 and 6-121 gives" dpw~ dtup
-
d2Ap(q N) (At) 2 ~ d(At) 2
(6-122)
It appears, therefore, that the superposition time derivative of the pressure buildup at large values of time approaches the drawdown second derivative function as defined by Cinco Ley et al. (1986). (See Cinco Ley and Samaniego, 1989.)
652 Equations 6-119 and 6-122 are valid for any flow regime. Thus, in Eq. 6-119 the superposition time pressure derivative of buildup data behaves, at early time, as the drawdown first derivative function; and at large shut-in times it follows the drawdown second derivative function. The first and second derivative functions for different flow regimes, in terms of real variables are as follows (Cinco Ley et al., 1986): Linear flow tAft = C1L t 1/2
(6-123)
2 Bilinear flow t a p ' = Clbft 1/4 t2 Izap,,I
=
C
lbftl/4
4
(6-124)
Radial flow tap'=
Clr
t2 Izap" I = c,~
(6-125)
Spherical flow t a p ' = Clsph t - m 3 t2 IAp"I = --~Clspht '/2
(6-126)
Wellbore storage and pseudosteady state flow t a p ' = Czw t t 2 ]Aff'l = 0
(6-127)
According to Eqs. 6-123 through 6-127, the first derivative is, in general, not equal to the second derivative function except for the radial flow case. Regardless of the flow model, the analysis of pressure buildup data can be performed through the use of type-curve matching of the superposition time derivative. However, two sets of drawdown type curves are required: the first and the second derivative function type curves. Figure 6-90 presents the first and the second derivative function type curves for radial flow under the influence ofwellbore storage and skin. It can be observed that they are completely different at early time, but both sets of type curves approach a single line when wellbore storage effects disappear. If the producing time is large, then pressure
653 10:'
C e2 s
10 ...
r
Q .,..1
O
FIRST DERIVATIVE
~
~~
,....
x
,.
D DERIVATIVE
161; I0 -l
9
1
.
10
,
10z
10 3
10 4
to/CD
Fig. 6-90. Type curves for the first and the second derivative function for radial flow condition, with skin and wellb0re storage.
buildup data match the entire drawdown type curve; however, if the producing time is small (i.e., flowing pressure before shut-in is still affected by wellbore storage), then the superposition time derivative follows at early time the first derivative type curve and after a transition period it follows the second derivative curve (see Fig. 6-91). Analysis of pressure buildup tests through the application of the superposition time derivative, Eq. 6-118 can lead to serious errors of interpretation. This occurs when the reservoir exhibits flow regimes other than radial. For instance, if the system is dominated by linear flow during the entire test, then the analyst can erroneously conclude that the system exhibits double-porosity behavior, because the superposition time derivative shows two parallel straight lines having slopes of 0.5. According to Eq. 6-118, the duration of the transition period between the first and second derivative behaviors depends on flow rate history and producing time. The deviation from the first derivative behavior occurs at approximately A t = O. 0 5 t . Here, P. a 5% difference between the curves is considered. The superposition time derivative follows the second derivative curve after A t = 2 t . Hence, the transition period extends for about two log cycles. P
A GENERAL APPROACH TO WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Undoubtedly, a key problem in the interpretation of well tests in carbonate formations is due to the extremely heterogeneous nature of these reservoirs. Pore space in such reservoirs is more complex than in sandstones. This problem presents a difficult
654
t
tD PD
dP w
dt sup
/~t
tD/C 0
Fig. 6-91. Schematic of match of pressure buildup derivative.
but challenging test to the well test interpreter. Sources of additional information, as indicated in Fig. 6-1, include: petrophysical studies, well logging (electric, sonic, and nuclear logs), and geological and geophysical studies. Thus, it is concluded that one must approach the interpretation of tests through an integrated approach. The discussion presented by Matthews and Russell (1967), with regard to state-ofthe-art of test analysis, is still valid in a general sense. Under favorable circumstances, present theories and analyses permit one to characterize a reservoir system, and good estimates of main damage and average pressure in the drainage volume of wells can be obtained by transient pressure test analysis. This is particularly true if the steps of the general approach of this section are followed. In regard to the question related to the identification of heterogeneities in a reservoir through the interpretation of pressure behavior, the answer is pretty much the same. It is not possible at this time to infer heterogeneity type and distribution solely from pressure data. Thus, there is a uniqueness problem in the interpretation of pressure analysis techniques. It is not possible for even the most experienced reservoir engineer to analyze a well test and in the absence of other additional information (geological, geophysical, petrophysical, etc.) to give a unique interpretation. Of course, this is not the correct approach to well test interpretation. Instead, the analyst must accomplish this task through an integrated reservoir characterization approach. The result is that in many cases one can obtain unique interpretations. The writers firmly agree with Matthews and Russell (1967) that when well test analyses are used in conjunction with all other additional information, the uniqueness problems are minimized. Different authors have addressed the question of a general approach to the analysis
655 TABLE 6-XVI General methodology of analysis 1. Estimation of unit flow rate response 2. Diagnosis of flow regimes 3. Application of specific graphs of analysis 4. Non-linear regression of the pressure data and simulation
TABLE 6-XVII Estimation of the unit flow rate response PRESSURE AND FLOW RATE DATA DECONVOLUTION OR IMPULSE INFLUENCE FUNCTION AND DERIVATIVES
TABLE 6-XVIII Flow diagnosis INFLUENCE FUNCTION AND DERIVATIVES Ap , ,
t A p'1 ,
t2 l A p7 [
TYPE OF FLOW AND DURATION
of well tests (e.g., Gringarten, 1985; Gringarten, 1987a; Ehlig-Economides, 1988; Cinco Ley and Samaniego, 1989; Ehlig-Economides et al., 1990; Horne, 1990; Stanislav and Kabir, 1990; Ramey, 1992). Such an approach consists of several steps, as indicated in Table 6-XVI: (1) Estimation of the influence function or unit flow rate response through the deconvolution process (Table 6-XVII). (2) Diagnosis offlow regime, which is usually accomplished through the use of the pressure derivative function (Fig. 6-24), and the second derivative as defined by Cinco Ley et al. (1986) and discussed herein. Figure 6-92 is a general graph of the second derivative for the main flow regimes encountered in a well test. Table 6-XVIII also illustrates the main parts of this flow diagnosis process. Figures 6-11 to 6-18 presented specific response characteristics that could be identified during a well test. It is strictly necessary to identify each portion of the response during a well test because specific portions are used to estimate specific reservoir parameters. As pointed out by Home (1990), often a good indication of reservoir response can be obtained by considering the responses preceding and following it, because the various responses follow a certain chronological order, as shown in Table 6-XIX. It is useful to verify that particular responses (e.g., wellbore storage, semilog
656
LINEAR
<1
BILINEAR
v
O9 m
o ._1
RADIAL
~
-1/2
SPHERICAL Log
t
Fig. 6-92. Second pressure derivative function for four different flow regimes. TABLE 6-XIX
Chronological order of the pressure responses during a well test
Radial flow
Early time
Intermediate time
Storage
Infinite acting radial flow
Closed boundary Sealing fault; Constant pressure Closed boundary Sealing fault; Constant pressure
Fracture
Storage
Bilinear flow
Radial flow
Double porosity
Storage
Double porosity behaviour
Transition
Radial flow
Late time
Closed boundary Sealing fault; Constant pressure
Source: After Home, 1990, table 2.2, p.35.
straight line, and boundary effect) appear in the correct order, and do not overlap each other (Fig. 6-93). One must remember those useful indicators in relation to transitions between flow regimes; for example, the 1.5 log cycles between the end of wellbore storage-dominated flow and the beginning of the infinite acting radial flow. Such cyclicity has become known as the 1.5 log cycle rule. With regard to this methodology steps in interpretation, one can use Agarwal's (1980) method to account for producing time effects in the analysis of buildup tests,
657 100
I
k c s
1
'
/
!
I
87. 67 1.427 x 10 -2 9.194
LCF 800
1.~9x1011
lO
PD
Storage
Boundary
1.5 log cycles
0.1 0.1
i
~
i
J
1
10
100
1000
.....
I
1x10 4
,,
I
1xlO 5
lx106
tDlC D Fig. 6-93. Correctly ordered pressure response for a well located in a bounded area. (AfterHome, 1990, fig. 3.12, p. 52.) as was discussed in the previous section related to deconvolution. In that section, the writers emphazised the correct interpretation of the superposition time pressure derivative of buildup data, one that behaves at early time as the drawdown first derivative function, and at late shut-in times, as the drawdown second derivative function. New derivative type curves have been presented by Onur and Reynolds (1988) and Duong (1989), their main advantage being that type-curve matching becomes a onedimensional, horizontal and vertical (respectively) movement of the field data on the type curve. This feature is especially important when hand-matching is attemped, because of the degree of freedom needed to obtain a match is reduced. Currently, during many tests the downhole rate is measured together with pressure, allowing the use of the convolution derivative (Ehlig-Economides et al., 1986; Joseph et al., 1986; Kuchuk, 1990). The convolution-derivative response reveals the earlytime, near-wellbore information, which normally is masked by wellbore storage effects. (3) Application of Specific Graphs of Analysis. Once the flow regime diagnosis process is completed, specialized or straight-line analysis may be used which is appropriate to the particular flow regime. The specific straight-line graphs of analysis and the correspondent estimation of parameters of interest have been previously discussed in this chapter, for the main flow regimes encountered during a well test (e.g., linear, radial cylindrical, spherical and bilinear flows: Figs. 6-5, 6-29, 6-8 and 6-10, respectively).
658 (4) Non-Linear Regression of the Pressure Data. This last portion of the methodology has to do with verification of the interpretation model. An excellent discussion on model verification has been presented by Gringarten (1985, 1987). First, a consistency check is needed to test that the model parameters estimated through the different methods of analysis (i.e., type curve and the specialized analysis), provide the same numerical values within a fixed tolerance. Second, a more stringent test consists of comparing a Homer graph of the pressure data with one predicted from information from the matched type curve. Third, test pressure history is simulated taking into account the actual rate data, using the selected model and the numerical values of the parameters computed from the analysis. In other words, the interpretation model selected from the analysis of a specific flow period must be valid for the entire test, and not for only that flow period. This procedure is very important with regard to revealing errors in flow diagnosis. When using computer-aided interpretation, analysis and possible model verification is done through non-linear regression. Home (1990, 1992) presented clear, excellent discussions of this subject. This method is different from graphical analysis techniques in that it employs mathematical algorithms to match measured data directly to a chosen reservoir model. The algorithm itself does not select the appropriate model. Instead, nonlinear regression requires specification of the reservoir model to be matched. This means that steps one and two of this procedure have to be taken at least before the start of this regression. Several of the main advantages of using non-linear regression are: (1) The procedure is free from the usual restrictions considered in graphical techniques (constant rate production and instantaneous shut-in) and can, therefore, be used to interpret more modem tests with variable rates and with downhole rate measurements. (2) This method fits all the data simultaneously, thus avoiding the problem of inconsistent interpretation of separate portions of the data, as can happen with the specific graphical analysis. (3) More complex models with more unknown reservoir parameters may be used for the matching process. (4) The method matches data that lie in the transition regions usually ignored by conventional specific graphical analysis, thus allowing interpretation of tests that would not have enough data for traditional analysis. (5) Last and very important (Ramey, 1992), mathematical fitting procedure allows statistical determination of the goodness of fit, thus,providing (in addition to the estimation of the reservoir parameters) a quantitative evaluation of the validity of the interpretation through the confidence limits or intervals. The matching process is carried out by changing the values of unknown reservoir parameters (e.g., permeability, skin factor, initial pressure, etc.) until the model and the data fit as closely as possible, by minimizing the sum of squares of the differences between measured pressure and model (calculated) pressure: N
Min E = ~ i-1
[Pmeasured(ti)--Pmodel (~-/i)]2
(6-128)
659 where the vector ~ includes the unknown reservoir parameters, and E is the objective function. Confidence intervals, in the manner described by Dogru et al. (1977) and Rosa and Home (1983), are functions of: (a) the objective function, (b) the degree of correlation between the unknowns, (c) the noise in the data, and (d) the number of data points relative to the number of unknowns. Usually with regard to modem well tests, which include much data available as compared to unknown parameters, the confidence interval depends mainly on E (i.e., how well the model fits the data, or the noise level of the data) or the correlation between parameters (i.e., a change in one parameter can be compensated by a change in another, still resulting in a good match). Confidence intervals are also helpful in illustrating the goodness of a chosen model, as well as an aid to resolve model ambiguity. In other words, matching a reservoir model that is inappropriate for the field data should result in confidence limits that are unacceptable for most (or all) of the estimates. Home (1992) presented an example where an infinite-acting radial flow response is used to match a double slope response caused by a sealing fault. His example emphasizes an important fact; that confidence limits obligate the interpreter to reject the analysis, even though the match is visually perfect to both pressure and pressure derivative functions. Ramey's (1992) findings could easily strike the conventional-oriented well-test analyst. Based on analysis of simulated and field cases, he firmly stresses the need for non-linear regression. One important conclusion is that the apparent Homer straight line is rarely the correct one. Ramey (1992) also states that it is not wise to depend on straight-line hand methods when regression with a proper model is possible. The confidence limits provide a superb quantitative measure of quality. In summary, non-linear regression with confidence limits on model reservoir parameters is a most powerful tool which provides important interpretation information, that otherwise is not available in conventional graphical well test analysis. This process should be followed by a final simulation of the test through the model and reservoir parameters obtained so as to prove that the interpretation was reasonable. On using the general methodology for the interpretation of a well test just described, following an integrated or synergy-oriented approach, the goal of characterizing a reservoir system and obtaining good estimates of its main parameters can, in most cases, be achieved under favorable circumstances.
A D D I T I O N A L W E L L TEST E X A M P L E S
Example 6-7. Pulse test in well pair A4-A8 (McKinley et al., 1968) A pulse test program was conducted in a dolomitic limestone having mainly vugular permeability. Formation oil has a gravity of 29 ~ API with negligible amounts of dissolved gas; all wells were on pump completed at the top of an anticline. Figure 6-94 shows the location of wells in the field. The dashed line on the right-hand side of the figure represents the approximate position of a fault limiting the reservoir. The pump was unseated at the observation well, the tubing was filled with LPG (to provide a liquid column to the surface), and a pressure gauge was attached directly to
660 C5.C
C]
C2
A5'
A9 A4
ARROWS CONNECT PULSE-TESTED WELL PAIRS POINT TO RESPONDING WELL
A6
A 2 ~'
AI
~.
A5 A
w
B]
B5 I
Fig. 6-94. Pulse test survey. (After McKinley et al., 1968, fig. 1, p. 313.)
the top of the tubing string. To keep pressure variation conditions in the test area unaltered, all neighboring wells were left on pump. The pressure response in well A4 to a pulse sequence at well A8 is shown in Fig. 6-95. Flow at well A8 was shut off at time t = 0 for 90 min, then opened to production for 90 min, etc. This flow rate sequence is shown by the dashed lines in Fig. 6-95. This pressure response at observation well A4 located 1867 ft (569 m) from the pulsing well (A8) is shown by the solid points in Fig. 6-95. The time lag, tL for the different pulses ranges between 3 0 40 min. The other parameter of interest in the analysis, the pressure amplitude Ap, ranges between 0 . 1 8 3 - 0.223 psi. The analysis method used each time lag tLi and amplitude APi to estimate the reservoir parameters of interest r/, T, and S. The analysis of the three-part results shown in Fig. 6-95 gives the following estimates:
661 0.60 9
PRESSURE
FLOW RATE 0.50
-
0.40
-
or) 13. Z
/
J J W I--
9 AP..
I
AP2"
/~-"~
",,
"
I
2"1" I :
0.50-
LLI (.9 Z "r"
a 13.. m
-
0.20
Z oo
bJ 0.10
-
-
800
b.I 1
O-
-IO0
f .......
I
I~
i I
I I
' I
-O.lO
9
9,-1, ".FF--I
0
I tL, I i
II
I
,,/
C--
I
I
I i
I I
'l:t / i 2
s I
lO0
200
I
',F
;
, tL| i 3 i
...J ....I I,I
I 300
- 4O0
LLI
or"
I
, I i I
I
I
0
400
-"J ii
500
TIME AFTER STARTING PULSE IN MINUTES Fig. 6-95. Pressure response at well A 4 to a pulse sequence at well A8. (After M c K i n l e y et al., 1968, fig. 2, p. 314.)
Part o f response curve First valley Second peak
r / = k / $/~c (mD-psi/cP) 2.44 x 109 2.44 x 109
T = kh / la (mD-ft/cP) 34,000 33,000
S = $ ch (ft/psi) 13.7 x 10-6 13.5 x 10 -6
Example 6-8. Pressure buildup test in well South Dome IS-21
South Dome well IS-21 was the first one to be fractured and acidized in the Shuaiba chalk reservoir, located in offshore Qatar (McDonald, 1983). Most of this reservoir is a low-permeability formation, with nonimpaired well productivity indices of about 0.1 bbl/D/psi or less. Consequently, to obtain commercial production the wells had to be stimulated. Results of studies have shown that massive acid-fracturing give good production enhancement results for this type of formation.
662
l 000-
0
Match Point
PwD :7.2 ~ Ap : I000 psi
cCr: I0
tDxf: 1.58 (~ or)
lO0-
u
.,::3
o
/ ,,
10 0.01
Time to start of semi-log si.line-50 hrs I 0.1
I 1
I I0
, I00
8t,hr Fig. 6-96. Pressure buildup data for well IS-21, PT-l-log-log graph. (After McDonald, 1983, fig. 1, p.
500.) Following the fracture stimulation of this well and an extended clean up, HRT (High-Resolution Thermometer) logs indicated the height of the fracture near the wellbore to be 76 ft (23 m). Immediately after, production test 1 was carried out and consisted of a 5.5 day flowing period during which time the productivity index declined from 5 bbl/D/psi to 1.9 bbl/D/psi, followed by a 2-day pressure buildup. Buildup and related additional data for this test are shown in Table 6-XX. The log-log graph of Ap vs. At for the early-time data from the buildup test in this well (Fig. 6-96) shows the characteristic shape of a highly conductive fracture, with a log-log slope of slightly less than 0.5. The data were matched using the type curves presented by Cinco-Ley et al. (1978), with a dimensionless fracture conductivity of (k:/5~o) = 10re. From the match shown in this type curve, the Homer semilog straight line appears to begin after 30 hr of shut-in time. Based upon this information, Fig. 697 shows the semilog analysis of the pressure data for this test. The slope m is 186 psi/ cycle. Using Eq. 6-47, the formation conductivity kh is (see Table 6-XIX):
kh =
162.6 (870 STB / D) (1.22) (1.5 cP) (186 psi / cycle)
= 1,390mD-ft
Assuming that the producing interval, h, is the height of the fracture inferred from HRT logs (76 ft; 23 m), then the average permeability is calculated as 18.3 mD. The skin factor can be calculated by means of Eq. 6-85, and the P~h~value of 1853 psi is estimated from Fig. 6-97" s = 1.1513
F 1853L
1850
186
(18.3mD)
]
)
- log I 0.21 (1.5cP)(10.4 x 10-6 psi-')(0.51 ft)2 + 3.2275
This value is considered as indicative of a satisfactorily stimulated well.
=-4.7
663 TABLE 6-XX Buildup data for well IS-21, PT-1 Reservoir thickness, h, ft Porosity, $, fraction Viscosity, p, cP Total formation compressibility, c,, psi -~ Formation volume factor, Bo Wellbore radius, rw, ft Effective production time, tp, hr Well flow rate, q, STB/D Depth of pressure reading, D, ft subsea
76 0.21 1.5 10.4 • 104 1.22 0.51 263 870 4618
At (min)
Pw~(psi)
At (hr)
pw~(psi)
0 1 3 5 7 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 105 120 150 180 240 330
1850 1870 1879 1884 1889 1896 1905 1912 1917 1922 1930 1938 1942 1949 1953 1957 1963 1967 1977 1986 1998 2013
8 9 10 13 16 20 24 30 36 42 48
2032 2041 2047 2063 2077 2093 2106 2121 2135 2146 2154
Source: After McDonald, 1983; courtesy of SPE of AIME.
From the type curve pressure match of the log-log graph of Ap vs. At [(PwD)M= 7.2 at (Ap) M = 1000 psi] formation flow conductivity is calculated through the use of the definition of dimensionless pressure (Table 6-11):
kh = 141.2(870 STB / D)(1.22) (1.5cP)
7.2 1000 psi
/
= 1620 mD - ft
This value is reasonably close to the kh derived from the Homer graph; therefore, enhancing confidence in the analysis. The permeability estimated in this case is 21.3 mD. Another parameter of interest, the fracture half-length, is calculated through use of the definition of dimensionless time and the type curve time match of the log-log graph (Fig. 6 - 9 6 (tDxy)M = 1.58 at (At)M = 10 hr).
664 2 200
2 100
-
n
~
(/)
"
3 C~
2 000
-
o o
m - 186 psi,/cycle
0 0
1 900
_o
0
~176
Pl~hr /
At, hr 10
I I
1 800
J
looo
20 J
48 I
lb
( tp§ At)/ t Fig. 6-97. Pressure buildup data for well IS-21, PT-1-Homer graph. (After McDonald, 1983, fig. 2, p.
500.) 2.637 • 10-4 (21.3mD)(10 hr) X/ =
0.21( 1.5cP)(10.4 x 10-6 psi-')(1.58)
7. ~/2 = 104 ft = 31.7m
J
This value differs notably from the design value for of x l of 1600 ft (488m) The fracture conductivity is computed from the type curve match and the definition for the dimensionless fracture conductivity (k/b:)D (= (k/b//kx:)"
k/b/= 10re (21.3mD) (104 ft) = 69,592.6 mD - ft This completes the analysis. Two final comments are worthwhile. First, the analysis was presented as discussed by McDonald (1983), prior to introduction by Bourdet et al. (1983) of the pressure derivative function. Results can be improved if this technique is used in the analysis. Second, the real life fact is that fracture design characteristics often differ from estimates obtained through analyses of well tests, a problem that commonly is also emphasized by differences in well productivity design projections with respect to field measured flow rate behavior.
Example 6-9. Pressure buiMup test in a partially penetrating oil well (Barr6n, 1991) A pressure buildup test was carried out in well Tecominoac~in 446, which produces from a carbonate formation in southeastern Mexico. Computer-aided analysis of this test was performed through the use of the SAPP system (Martinez et al., 1991). The
665 4.88
4.85
j
(-9
J
C/3 -
-
rn
O
4.80
i
o r162 Q.
4,75
i
4.72
I 0
I 0.004
i
I 0.008
SHUT-IN
0.012
0.016
0020
TIME , A t , H R
Fig. 6-98. Cartesiangraph ofbottomhole shut-inpressure, Tecominoac~in446 well. (AfterBarr6n, 1991, fig. 6, p. 89.) main reservoir and fluid data, in addition to the pressure data recorded, are presented in Table 6-XXI. Figure 6-98 is a cartesian graph of the bottomhole shut-in pressure Pws vs. shut-in time At, indicating that the correct flowing pressure just before shut-in Pw/(At = 0) is approximately 4722.35 psig. Figure 6-99 is a graph of the pressure derivative function vs. shut-in time, observing four different flow periods, listed in chronological order as follows: (a) wellbore storage-dominated flow, (b) early radial flow influenced by the perforated interval, h,(c) a transition flow period, and (d) pseudoradial flow governed by the formation thickness h. This graph completes the flow diagnosis process for the test. Figure 6-100 shows a log-log graph of the pressure drop and of the pressure derivative function vs. shut-in time. These results were automated type-curve matched with an infinite-acting radial flow model and fully penetrating well as indicated by continuous curves, which explains the poor fit of the field data corresponding to the first three flow periods mentioned. The oscillations shown at the end of the test are believed to be due to reservoir temperature being too close to the maximum gauge operating temperature of 300 ~ F (Table 6-XXI). Figures 6-101 and 6-102 present Miller-Dyes-Hutchinson graphs of the pressure buildup data, which emphasize the early radial flow and the late radial flow, respectively. These graphs are justified based on the very large production time: t = 34,824 hr. The semilog straight lines are traced based on the flow diagnosis results already discussed with regard to Fig. 6-99.
666 2.8
000. 0 o
2.5
oj
<::!
_ o
q)
0 ~ %~176176176176
2.0 o
1.5
,
I
-2.5
i
o
1
-1.5
-0.5 LOG
1.5
0.5
At
Fig. 6-99. Log-log graph of the pressure derivative function vs. shut-in time, Tecominoac~in 446 well. (After Barr6n, 1991, fig. 27, p. 90.)
10 4
RESULTS FLOW CAPACITY, kho a d - f t
TRACING PAPER-
PER,tASILITY.,,
FIELD DATA Q.
-~ c
= 2042
r.16
.~
SKIN FACTOR M[LLBORE STORAGE, C, DIMENSIONLESS WELLBORE STORAGE. CD BEGINNING SEMIL06 STRAIGHT LINE. tbssL . HRS
:
~Type curve f-~
0.82 30.4 = 1947.6
:
0.70
10 3
.....
,l~k. . . . . .
Q.
102 ~
~
....
.... - ! , -
_
A .,,,
xxl~ax~
10 10-3
10-2
10 -1
SHUT-
10 ~
IN
10
10 2
TIME, At,HR
Fig. 6-100. Log-log graph of the pressure drop and the pressure derivative function vs. shut-in time, Tecominoac~in 446 well. (After Barr6n, 1991, fig. 28, p. 91.)
667 5 830
I
'
I
DATA: RATE,q, STB/D
5 720
= 4641 1.73 = 0.23 . 20.96x10 "~ : 0.27 = 0.03 131.20 = 4720.82
FOR~TION voL.F.,Bo
56]0
VISCOSITY, /~o' cp i CONPRESSIBILI T Y , - c t , p s i " I~LLBORE RADIUS, - r . , FT POROSITY, O, FRACTION" THICKNESS,h c ! f t pwf(&t=O), psi
I !I
Jr"
5500 , 5390
/
5 280 ,
3= 0.
tbssl = 0.203 HRS
it x
5 170 ,
~x
5 060
~
•
4950
RESULTS FORMATION CONDUCTIVITY, k h , m d - f t = PERMEABILITY, k, md = SKIN FACTOR, S : (Ap)s, psi SLOPE m, psi/cycle = pws(1HR), psi :
x~
4840 . /
Ixx~ x
4730 l _
x
1099 8.38 -2.64 -612.6 266.4 5609.5
x
l
10-2
10-3
10-]
10 o
SHUT-IN
TIME,
6L,
10 ]
10 2
HR
Fig. 6-101. MDH graph of the pressure buildup data, early radial flow, Tecominoac~in 446 well. (After Barr6n, 1991, fig. 29, p. 92.)
5 830 I 5 720 5 610
DATA:
l
RATE,q, STB/D = 4441 FORMATION VOL.F. ,B 0 1.73 -VISCOSITY, cp 1 = 0.23 2 0 . 9 6BXLx I TY, l OVct, ' 6 pCs i "O N P R= E S S I I MELLBORE RADIUS, r , FT = 0.27 I POROSITY, r FRACTIONW = 0.03 I - THICKNESS, h , f t = 285.20 puf(kt=O), psi = 4720.82
._,
5 500
~
/ ' ~ x
~
/
xx
x
x xlx
t bsst = 3 4 . 5 5
HRS
I x
xx xx
" 5 390 x
i#i
3 5
280
'Y
x x
5 170 x x
5 060 4
x
950
xx
RESULTS FORMATION CONDUCTIVITY, kh, m d - f t = 2388 PERMEABILITY, k , md : 8.37 SKIN FACTOR, s 2.16 (4p)s, psi 230.5 SLOPE m, p s i / c y c t e 122.6 Pws(At=IHR), psi = 5641.4
x x
4 840
x
x-~
4 730 lO-
3
, 0 -z
10-1 SHUT - I N
lO 0 TIME
, At,
1 101
10 2
HR
Fig. 6-102. MDH graph of the pressure buildup data, late radial flow, Tecominoacan 446 well. (After Barr6n, 1991, fig. 30, p. 92.)
668 5 830
DATA: RATE,q,STB/D FORMATION VOL.F.,B 0 VISCOSITY, ~n, cp CONPRESSIBILITY,-ct, psi "1 IdELLBORE RADIUS, - r , FT POROSITY, 4, FRACTIONw THICKNESS, h 9 pwf(&t=O), psi t p , HRS
5 720 5 610
= = = = = =
4441 1.73 0.23 . 20.96x10 "6 0.27 0.03 131.20 4720.82 34824
//J_x
5 500 -
J
u*J
5 390 u~
3= 5280
x xxxXXXXXXX~~
t bss~,= 0 . 6 9 4 HRS
-
J
C2.
5170
J
J
5 060
x .x
I1 x
xx
4950
x
x
RESULTS FORMATION CONDUCTIVITY, PERMEABILITY, k, SKIN FACTOR, s (Ap)s, psl FLOW EFFICIENCY, FE p~, psi SLOPE m, p s i / c y c l e t
X
X
4 840 '
x= x
X
x
4 730
I0- r
I0- 6
kh, m d - f t = 1094 = 8.33 -2.66 = -618.9 1.29 = 6825.8
267.7
I0- 4
I0- 5
i0-3
( tp + A t ) / A L
Fig. 6-103. Homer graph of the pressure buildup data, early radial flow, Tecominoacfin 446 well. (After Barr6n, 1991, fig. 31, p. 93.) 5 830
f
5 720
5 610 x
5 500 a.
~=
5 390
J
x x
x
x
x
t b s s l = 14.251
x
HRS
x x x
x
x xx
5 280
x
DATA: RATE,q,STB/D FORMATION VOL.F.,B o VISCOSITY, ~_, cp
x
5 170
= = ,
CONPRESSIBILITY,UCt, psi " l
UELLBORE RADIUS, - r , FT POROSITY, 4, FRACTION~ THICKNESS, h, f t p w f ( l t = O ) , psi t p , HRS
5 060 X X
l
4 950
RESULTS FORMATION CONDUCTIVITY, kh, ~ - f t PERNEABILITY, k, SKIN FACTOR, s (Ap)s, psi FLOW EFFICIENCY, FE p ~ psi SLOPE m, p s i / c y c L e i
X
x x
4 840
x
x
9
xx
4 730
i0-7
10-6
10-5 ( tp *bt
10-4
= =
=
4441 1.73 0.23 -6 20.96x10 0.27 0.03 285.20 4720.82 34826
= 2389 = 8.38 : 2.17 230.9 : 0.81, = 6198.0 = 122.5
10-3
)/At
Fig. 6-104. Homer graph of the pressure buildup data, late radial flow, Tecominoac~in 446 well. (After Barr6n, 1991, fig. 32, p. 94.)
669 Figures 6-103 and 6-104 show Homer graphs of the pressure buildup data, which again emphasize early and late radial flows, respectively. The semilog straight lines are traced based on the flow diagnosis results discussed with regard to Fig. 6-99. Table 6-XXII is a summary of the results obtained from the interpretation of this test. It can be concluded that results from the type curve analysis, and the results of the specialized Miller-Dyes-Hutchinson and Homer analyses are in agreement with regard to permeability. The skin factor, and its strictly related pressure drop due to the skin damage, APs, do not agree from the type curve match to those of the specialized semilog methods. This is due to the fact that the partially-penetrating well behavior was matched with a fully-penetrating well pressure response solution. The nearby formation presents stimulation conditions, as indicated by the negative true skin factor, Str, caused by stimulation to the completed portion of the well. Another important piece of information that can be obtained from this test is the effective formation thickness of the well, information that is of particular use when the well does not fully penetrate the formation. The writers use estimations for the early m e and late radial m I flOWS (266.4 psig and 122.6 psig, respectively, in the following expression derived by Raghavan and Clark (1975): mih
- 1
(6-129)
me hc
m~
(6-130)
h = ---5~h c
ml
Substituting values in this expression yields" h =
266.4 / 122.6
131.2 = 285.2 ft = 87 m
The estimate for h derived from well logging is 360 ft (110 m). It is believed that the value estimated from the analysis of the test, 285.2 ft (87 m), is more reliable because it was computed under dynamic flow conditions of the reservoir. For the flow conditions of this well, Eq. 6-54 for the skin factor can be simplified, resulting in the following expression: h s = s c- ~ s h tr
(6-131)
c
Thus, h s = s-~s c h '~ r
Evaluating this expression:
(6-132)
670
TABLE 6-XXI Pressure buildup data for well Tecominoacdn 446 Reservoir and fluid data
Initial pressure, Pi Temperature, T, ~ Bubble point pressure, Pb Initial solution gas--oil ratio, Rsi Formation volume factor, Bo Viscosity,/~o Oil compressibility, c o Porosity, Water saturation, S Wellbore radius, r w Perforated interval, h c Flow rate, q Producing time, t Depth (of the middle point of the perforated interval), D
9812 psig 289 3545 psig 196 fi3 / ft 3 1.725 0.235 cP 20.9610 -6 (psi) -I 0.032 0.106 0.27 fi 131.2 ft 4441 STB/D 34824 hr 5995 m
Buildup data
Time, At (hr)
Pressure, Pws (psi)
Time, At (hr)
Pressure, Pws (psi)
0 0.0050 0.0111 0.0119 0.0138 0.0161 0.0180 0.0211 0.0249 0.0268 0.0310 0.0329 0.0386 0.0441 0.0496 0.0566 0.0663 0.0805 0.0901 0.0952 0.1152 0.1402 0.1566 0.1775 0.1983 0.2230 0.2483 0.2810 0.3150 0.3520 0.3966 0.4466 0.5294
4753.64 4765.12 4808.12 4815.59 4833.90 4852.71 4871.73 4901.86 4938.12 4958.06 4993.04 5009.06 5053.58 5095.76 5135.04 5178.35 5230.32 5271.67 5302.94 5328.29 5353.28 5379.79 5394.15 5408.75 5420.95 5435.15 5447.92 5462.98 5476.42 5489.02 5503.10 5516.90 5536.03
1.4811 1.6811 1.9477 2.0811 2.2811 2.4811 2.7144 2.9144 3.1644 3.4144 3.7144 3.9144 4.1144 4.4144 4.6114 4.9144 5.4477 6.7841 6.9175 8.1494 8.9397 9.9064 10.9063 11.9897 12.9063 13.9064 14.7397 15.4111 15.9111 16.9111 17.9111 18.9111
5639.23 5649.38 5661.26 5666.27 5672.89 5678.82 5685.04 5690.12 5695.02 5700.36 5705.23 5708.45 5711.63 5715.71 5718.57 5722.20 5728.66 5740.19 5741.31 5751.86 5757.54 5763.16 5768.94 5773.43 5777.28 5781.37 5784.52 5787.06 5788.82 5792.04 5795.06 5798.06
671 TABLE 6-XXI Buildup data (continued) Time, At (hr) Pressure, Pws (psi) 0.6325 0.7325 0.8841 0.8241 1.0408 1.1811 1.3477
5555.46 5571.37 5583.13 5594.81 5607.05 5618.74 5630.72
Time, At (hr)
Pressure, Pw~(psi)
19.9858 20.9025 21.9183 22.8927 24.0180 24.1680
5800.76 5802.90 5805.74 5808.13 5810.69 5811.03
TABLE 6-XXII Results obtained from the analysis of the buildup test in well Tecominoac~in446 Parameter k h (mD-ft) (mD) s (Ap)s, psig FE kr
Type Curve (Fig. 6-100)
MDH analysis (Fig. 6-102)
Homer analysis Fig. 6-104)
2042 7.16 0.82 102.1
2388 8.37 2.16 230.5 --
2389 8.38 2.17 230.9 0.84
Str
Other results
- 2.64 285.2 /
s
c
= 2.16-
(-2.64) = 7.90 13112
Now, using the Papatzacos (1987) method for the estimation of the partial penetration pseudoskin factor, an estimate of the vertical permeability can be obtained. Dimensionless thickness hwo is defined as:
hwD -
he j .kr rw
(6-133)
k
The vertical permeability, k, can be expressed from the above definition:
( c/2
k=k~
(6-134)
hwDr w
The Papatzacos expression for the estimation of the pseudoskin, s c, is given by the expression:
Sc=
l;
where:
-1
In
~
~
+--ffln
I
2+b
B
1
(6-135)
672 b=h/h
(6-136)
A = lc/(ZID + b / 4 ) B = 1/(zn~ + 3 b / 4 ) Zl D
=z1/h
(6-137)
and z~ is the height from the top of reservoir to the top of the producing interval. For the conditions of this well:
zl -
h
h
2
2
w
(6-138)
From the previous expression for s"
1Eb(A-111]
2b hwz ~ -
s - ~ In c b
2+b
B
1
exp
(6-139)
(1/b-l)
Substituting values yields: 285.2 Z 1 --~
2
131.2 --
"- 77
2
77 zlz~ =
= 0.27 285.2
A = 1 / (0.27 + (0.25)(0.46)) = 2.597 B = 1 / (0.27 + (0.75)(0.46)) = 1.626
7.90hwz~ =
2(0.46)
(1 / E~ In
0.46
2+0.46
exp (1 / 0 . 4 6 - 1)
hwz~ = 2297 (131.2) k
-
(8.38)
/2 -
(2297) (0.27)
o.38 mO
1)11
1.626- 1
673 The vertical permeability can also be estimated using the method of Cinco Ley et al. (1975).
C O N C L U D I N G REMARKS
This chapter reviews relevant aspects of pressure transient analysis theory. It is hoped that this discussion will provide the reader with the basic knowledge necessary to apply the theory of pressure transient analysis to well tests in carbonate reservoirs. Undoubtedly, a key problem in the interpretation of well tests in carbonate formations is due to the extremely heterogeneous nature of these formations. Pore space systems in carbonate reservoirs are usually more complex than in sandstones. This introduces a difficult but challenging problem to the well test interpreter. It is imperative to approach this task through an integrated effort as discussed with specific regard to Fig. 6-1, where the interpreter evaluates the test using all related information of interest available: geophysical, well logging data, geological, and petrophysical. It is expected that this area of petroleum engineering that has experienced very dynamic growth for the last 30 years will continue its fast development, giving as a result better interpretation techniques that will greatly help the characterization of complex carbonate reservoirs. The latter is an imperative step to be taken in an optimization study of a reservoir, and is of special current importance when drilling is carried out under more hostile conditions.
NOMENCLATURE
A An
b B
c~
cy Ct
CA Clws
Clr C1L
Cbj Clsp C2w C l rpss C2rpss
D DF
= drainage area = Table 6-V, parameters of the dimensionless pressure response for spherical flow at constant rate producing conditions, in a finite closed reservoir = )/~P.2eD "~" (reD-- 1)2 / {~2,[~t2p.2, eD -[- (l"2eD "1- re D _ 1 ) 2 ] } = linear reservoir width = formation volume factor = pore volume compressibility = modified pore volume compressibility, Eq. (6-68) = total system compressibility, Eq. (6-67) = shape factor = constant for wellbore storage-dominated flow, Eq. (6-15) = constant for radial flow, Eq. (6-20) = constant for linear flow, Eq. (6-21) = constant for bilinear flow, Eq. (6-23) = constant for spherical flow, Eq. (6-25) = interception constant for spherical flow, Eq. (6-25) = constant for pseudosteady state flow, Eq. (6-27) = interception constant for pseudosteady state floF, Eq. (6-27) non-Darcy flow coefficient = (sJ3kmps c / h Tc)rJ"~(1/pr2)dr = damage factor, Eq. (6-59)
674
E Ez (x) FE h h k k Ja Ji N c
s
m m* mobf moL
m osph n P P p*
Pw! Pws
Pp(P) plp (p)
Pe
r?'o r
skin
Ap' Ap" Po q
Q I" rs rw r wa
S s sr s! sp Str
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
objective function, Eq. (6-128) exponential integral, Eq. (6-43) flow efficiency, Eq. (6-56) thickness thickness of completed interval, Fig. 6-30c permeability permeability of the damaged region, Fig 6-30a actual productivity index ideal productivity index total number of different flow rates, Eq. 6-104 slope of the semilogarithmic radial flow pressure behavior, Eq. (6-47) reservoir linear pressure trend, Eq. (6-86) slope of the bilinear flow graph, Eq. (6-11) slope of the linear flow graph, Eq. (6-7) slope of the spherical flow graph, Eq. (6-9) direction normal to the surface, Eq. (6-3), or exponent of the pressure derivative function, Eq. (6-29) pressure average pressure extrapolated Homer graph pressure for infinite shut-in time flowing bottomhole pressure shut-in bottomhole pressure pseudopressure or real gas potential, for gases, Eq. (6-63), and for liquids, Eq. (6-95) normalized liquid pseudopressure, Eq. (6-96) pressure drop influence function, Eq. (6-104) pressure drop error due to wrong initial pressure estimation pressure drop due to the skin factor pressure derivative function, Eq. (6-31) second pressure derivative function dimensionless pressure dimensionless gas pseudopressure = kh [pp(pi) --Pp(Pwf)] / Otg qsc T, Eq. (6-71) flow rate cumulative production, Eq. (6-120) radial distance radius of the damaged region, Eq. (6-49) wellbore radius apparent wellbore radius, Eq. (6-61) Laplace space variable, or formation storage skin factor, Eqs. 6-48, 6-49 and 6-53, or external boundary, Eq. (6-3) pseudoskin factor due to partial completion pseudoskin factor due to a hydraulic fracture pseudoskin factor due to perforations true skin factor due to damage of the formation
675
ss
wp
t tD
t
Ate T W w
n
O~g
= pseudoskin factor due to well inclination = time = dimensionless time = producing time = shut-in time = Agarwal's (1980) effective time = temperature or transmissivity = gas compressibility = roots of Eq. 47 of Chatas (1966), p. 106 = Table 6-V, roots of Eq. 47 of Chatas (1966), p. 106 = pseudopressure unit conversion constant for radial flow, Eq. (6-72), 5.03332 x
r
n
a o Ot
osph
aoL
8t
17 //
/./ Y r,
10 4
- Table 6-IV, roots of Eq. VII-7 of van Everdingen and Hurst, 1949, p. 319 = pressure unit conversion constant for radial flow, Eq. (6-40), 141.2 = pressure unit conversion constant for spherical flow, Eq. (6-8) = pressure unit conversions factor for linear flow, Eq. (6-7), 887.1 = Table 6-IV, roots of Eq. VII-15 of van Everdingen and Hurst, 1949, p. 322 = time unit conversion constant, 2.637 x 10-4 = pressure unit conversion factor for bilinear flow, Eq. (6-11), 34.97 --- total interval used in the smoothing pressure, symmetrically located with respect to the point of interest, Eq. 6-88 - porosity = diffusivity = Table 6-IV, roots of Eq. VII-21 of van Everdingen and Hurst, 1949, p. 322 = viscosity = variable of integration, Eq. (6-105) = Euler constant, Eq. ( 6 - 4 4 ) , - 0.5772 = Table 6-V, roots ofeq. 52 of Chatas (1966), p. 108
Subscripts
t
= -= = = = = =
unit time reference beginning or bilinear dimensionless effective or end initial or index index late laminar oil radial standard conditions total
tr
-
true
1 0 b D e i
J l lam o r sc
676
Superscripts . , "
= e x p o n e n t (Eq. 6 - 2 9 ) = first d e r i v a t i v e = second derivative
Si Metric Conversion Factors b b l x 1 . 5 8 9 873 cP x 1.0" flx 3.048* ft 3 x 2 . 8 3 1 6 8 5 mD x 9.869 233 psi x 6 . 8 9 4 7 5 7 p s i -1 x 1 . 4 5 0 3 7 7 psi 2 x 4.753 8 ~
x 5/9
E-01 = m 3 = Pa.s E-01 = m E-02 = m 3 E-04 = gm 2 E+00 = kPa E - 0 1 = k P a -1 E+01 -kPa 2 E-03
E+00 = K
REFERENCES
Adams, A.R., Ramey, H.J.Jr. and Burgess, R.J., 1968. Gas well testing in a fractured carbonate reservoir. J. Petrol. Techn., 28(10): 1187 - 1194. Agarwal, R.G., 1979. Real gas pseudo-time- a new function for pressure buildup analysis of MHF gas wells. Paper SPE 8279, 54th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 23-26. Agarwal, R.G., 1980. A new method to account for producing time effects when drawdown type curves are used to analyze pressure buildup and other test data. Paper SPE 9289, 55th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, Sept. 21 - 24. A1-Hussainy, R., Ramey, H.J.Jr. and Crawford, P.B., 1966. The flow of real gases through porous media. J. Petrol. Techn., 18(5): 637 - 642. Aminian, K., Ameri, S., Abbit, W.E. and Cunningham, L.E., 1991. Polinomial approximations for gas pseudopressure and pseudotime. Paper SPE 23439, Eastern Reg. Mtg., Lexington, Kentucky, Oct. 22 -25. Aziz, K., 1989. Ten golden rules for simulation engineers. J. Petrol. Techn., 41 (11): 1157 - 1158. Barr6n T.R., 1991. Factores de da~o en pozos desviados parcialmente penetrantes. M.Sc. report, School of Engineering, National University of Mexico, 139 pp. Bostic, J.N., Agarwal, R.G. and Carter, R.D., 1980. Combined analysis of postfracturing performance and pressure buildup data for evaluating an MHF gas well. J. Petrol. Techn., 32(10): 1 7 1 1 - 1 7 1 9 . Bourdet, D., Whittle, T.M., Douglas, A.A. and Pirard, Y.M., 1983. A new set of type-curves simplifies well test analysis. World Oil, 196(4): 9 5 - 106. Bourdet, D., Ayoub, J.A. and Pirard, Y.M., 1989. Use of pressure derivative in well test interpretation. SPE Formation Eval., 4(2): 2 9 3 - 302. Bourgeois, M.J. and Home, R.N., 1993. Well test model recognition using Laplace space. SPE Formation Eval., 8(1): 17 - 25. Chatas, A.T., 1966. Unsteady spherical flow in petroleum reservoirs. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 6(2): 1 0 2 - 114. Carslaw, H.S. and Jaeger, J.C., 1959. Conduction of Heat in Solids. Oxford University Press, London, 510 pp. Cinco Ley, H. and Samaniego, V.F., 1977. Effect of wellbore storage and damage on the transient pressure behavior of vertically fractured wells. SPE Paper 6752, presented at SPE 52nd Annual Fall Meeting, Denver, CO, Oct. 9 - 12.
677
Cinco Ley, H. and Samaniego, V.F., 1981. Transient pressure analysis for fractured wells. J. Petrol. Techn., 33(9): 1749 - 1766. Cinco Ley, H. and Samaniego, V.F., 1982. Pressure transient analysis for naturally fractured reservoirs. Paper SPE 11026, 58th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA. Cinco Ley, H. and Samaniego, V.F., 1989. Use and misuse of the superposition time function in well test analysis. Paper SPE 19817, 64th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 8-11. Cinco Ley, H., Ramey, H.J.Jr. and Miller, F.G., 1975. Pseudo-skin factors for partially penetrating directionally drilled wells. Paper SPE 5589, 50th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, Sept. 2 8 - Oct. 1. Cinco Ley, H., Samaniego, V.F. and Dominguez, A.N., 1978. Transient pressure behavior for a well with a finite conductivity vertical fracture. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 18(4): 253 - 264. Cinco Ley, H., Samaniego, V.F., Parra, J., Dominguez, V.G.C. and Rivera R.J., 1984. Aspectos pr~cticos del an~ilisis de pruebas de presi6n en yacimientos de alta permeabilidad. Area Cantarell. Ing. Petrolera, XXIV(2): 3 7 - 4 6 . Cinco Ley, H., Samaniego, V.F. and Viturat, D., 1985. Pressure transient analysis for high-permeability reservoirs. Paper SPE 14314, 60th Annual Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, NV., Sept. 22 -25. Cinco Ley, H., Kuchuk, F., Ayoub, J., Samaniego, V.F. and Ayesteran, L., 1986. Analysis of pressure tests through the use of instantaneous source response concepts. Paper SPE 15476, 61st Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, Oct. 5 - 8. Clark, D.G. and van Golf-Racht, T.D., 1985. Pressure-derivative approach to transient test analysis: a high-permeability North Sea reservoir example. J. Petrol. Techn., 37(11): 2023 - 2039. Clark, K.K., 1968. Transient pressure testing of fractured water injection wells. J. Petrol. Techn., 20(6): 639 - 643; Trans. AIME, 243. Coats, K.H., Rapoport, L.A., McCord, J.R. and Drews, W.P., 1964. Determination of aquifer influence functions from field data. J. Petrol. Techn., 16(12): 1417- 1424. Crawford, D.A., Waller, H.N. and Sanders, L.J., 1981. Comparison of conventional and type curve analysis of pressure falloff tests for a west Texas carbonate reservoir. Paper SPE 10639, Production Technology Symposium, Lubbock, TX. Crawford, G.E., Hagerdorn, A.R. and Pierce, A.E., 1976. Analysis of pressure buildup tests in a naturally fractured reservoir. J. Petrol. Techn., 28(11): 1295- 1300. Crawford, G.E., Pierce, A.E. and McKinley, R.M., 1977. Type curves for McKinley analysis of drillstem data. Paper SPE 6754, 52nd Annual Fall Meeting, Denver, CO, Oct. 9 - 12. Deryuck, B.G., Bourdet, D.E, DaPrat, G. and Ramey, H.J.Jr., 1982. Interpretation of interference test in reservoirs with double porosity behavior-theory and field examples. Paper SPE 11025, 57th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, Sept. 26-29. de Swaan, O.A., 1976. Analytic solutions for determining naturally fractured reservoir properties by well testing. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 16(2): 117- 122. Dogru, A.H., Dixon, T.N. and Edgar, T.F., 1977. Confidence limits on the parameters and predictions of slightly compressible, single phase reservoirs. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 17(1): 4 2 - 56. Dominguez, V.G.C., Samaniego, V.F. and Chilingarian, G.V., 1992. Simulation of carbonate reservoirs. In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke, III (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part I. Elsevier, New York, pp. 4 3 9 - 503. Duong, A.N., 1989. A new set of type curves for well test interpretation using the pressure derivative ratio. SPE Formation Eval., 4(2): 2 6 4 - 272. Earlougher, R.C.Jr., 1977. Advances in Well Test Analysis. Monograph Series, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas, TX. Economides, M.J. and Ogbe, D.O., 1987. How to analyze interference well tests, part 2. World Oil, 205(2): 5 4 - 57. Ehlig-Economides, C.A. 1988. Use of the pressure derivative for diagnosing pressure-transient behavior. J. Petrol. Techn., 40(10): 1280- 1282. Ehlig-Economides, C.A. and Ramey, H.J.Jr., 1981. Transient rate decline analysis for wells produced at constant pressure. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 21 (1): 98 - 104. Ehlig-Economides, C.A., Joseph, J.A., Ambrose, R.W.Jr. and Norwood, C.F., 1990. A modem approach to reservoir testing. J. Petrol. Techn., 42(12): 1554- 1563.
678 Energy Resources Conservation Board, 1975. Theory and Practice of the Testing of Gas Wells, 13rd ed., Pub. ERCB-75-34, Calgary, Canada, 505 pp. Fair, ES. and Simmons, J.F., 1992. Novel well testing applications of Laplace transform deconvolution. Paper SPE 24716, 67th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, DC, Oct. 4 - 7 . Fetkovich, M.J. and Vienot, M.E., 1984. Rate normalization of buildup pressure by using afterflow data. J. Petrol. Techn., 36(12): 2211-2224. Fligelman, H., Cinco Ley, H. and Ramey, H.J.Jr., 1981. Drawdown Testing for High Velocity Gas Flow. SPE Paper 9904, California Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, CA, March 25 - 27. Fligelman, H., Cinco Ley, H., Ramey, H.J.Jr., Braester, C. and Couri, F., 1989. Pressure-drawdown test analysis of a gas well-application of new correlations. SPE Formation Eval., 4(3): 4 0 6 - 4 1 2 . Gringarten, A.C., 1982. Interpretation of tests in fissured reservoirs with double porosity behavior: Theory and practice. Paper SPE 10044, SPE International Petroleum Exhibition and Technical Symp., Beijing, China, March 18 - 26. Gringarten, A.C., 1984. Interpretation of tests in fissured reservoirs and multilayered reservoirs with double porosity behavior: Theory and practice. J. Petrol. Techn., 36(4): 5 4 9 - 564. Gringarten, A.C., 1985. Interpretation of transient well test data. In: R.A. Dawe and D.C. Wilson (Editors), Developments in Petroleum Science- 1, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, 297 pp. Gringarten, A.C., 1987a. Type-curve analysis: what it can and cannot do. J. Petrol. Techn., 39 (1): 11 13. Gringarten, A.C., 1987b. How to recognize "double-porosity" systems from well test. J. Petrol. Techn., 39 (6): 631 - 633. Gringarten, A.C., Bourdet, D.P., Landel, P.A. and Kniazeff, V.J., 1979. A comparison between different skin and wellbore storage type-curves for early-time transient analysis. Paper SPE 8205, 54th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 23 - 26. Guti6rrez, R.M.E., 1984. Uso de curvas tipo en el an~lisis de pruebas de interferencia y de un solo pulso. B.Sc. report, School of Engineering, National University of Mexico, M6xico, DF, 84 pp. Guti6rrez, R.M.E. and Cinco Ley, H., 1985. Uso de curvas tipo en el an~ilisis de pruebas de interferencia y de un solo pulso. Ingenieria Petrolera, XXV (10): 2 4 - 4 7 . Hawkins, M.F.Jr., 1956. A note on the skin effect. Trans. AIME, 207:356 - 357. Home, R.N., 1990. Modern Well Test Analysis. Petroway Inc., Palo Alto, CA, 183 pp. Home, R.N., 1992. Advances in computer-aided well test interpretation. Paper SPE 24731, 67th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, D.C., Oct. 4 - 7. Homer, D.R., 1951. Pressure build-up in wells. Proc. Third World Pet. Congr., The Hague, Sec. I: 503 - 523. Huinong, Z., 1984. Interference testing and pulse testing in the Kenl carbonate oil p o o l - A case history. J. Petrol. Techn., 36(6): 1009 - 1017. Hurst, W., 1953. Establishment of the skin effect and its impediment to fluid flow into a wellbore. Pet. Eng. (Oct.): B-6-B-16. Hutfilz, J.M., Cockerham, P.W. and Mclntosh, J.R., 1982. Pulse testing for reservoir description in a high permeability environment, dr. Petrol. Techn., 34(9): 2179 - 2190. Jacob, C.E., 1940. On the flow of water in an elastic artesian aquifer. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union: 574 - 586. Jacob, C.E. and Lohman, J.W., 1952. Nonsteady flow to a well of constant drawdown in an extensive aquifer. Trans. AGU: 559-569. Jain, A. and Ayuob, J.A., 1983. Pressure buildup in gas-lift oil wells, Falah field, offshore Dubai. Paper SPE 11446, Middle East Oil Technical Conference, Manama, Bahrain. Jargon, J.R. and van Poollen, H.K., 1965. Unit response function from varying-rate data. J. Petrol. Techn., 17(8): 965 - 969. Jones, P. and McGhee, E., 1956. Gulf Coast wildcat verifies reservoir limit test. Oil and Gas dr., 196(54): 1 8 4 - 196. Kabir, C.S. and Willmon, J.H., 1981. Pressure transient testing in high transmissibility reservoirs: design and analysis considerations. J. Can. Pet. Tech., 20(2): 6 4 - 73. Karakas, M. and Tariq, S.M., 1991. Semianalytical productivity models for perforated completions. SPE Production Eng., 6(1):73 - 82. Kuchuk, F.J., 1990. Applications of convolution and deconvolution to transient well tests. SPE Formation Eval., 5(4): 375 - 384.
679 Kuchuk, F.J. and Ayesteran, L., 1985. Analysis of simultaneously measured pressure and sandface flow rate in transient well testing. J. Petrol. Techn., 37(2): 323 - 334. Kuchuk, F.J. and Kirman, P.A., 1987. New skin and wellbore storage type curves for partially penetrated wells. SPE Formation Eval., 2(4): 5 4 6 - 554. Langston, E.P., 1976. Field application of pressure buildup test, Jay-Little Escambia crack fields. Paper SPE 6199, 51st Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans. LA. Lee, W.J., 1967. Analysis of hydraulically fractured wells with pressure buildup tests. Paper SPE 1820, 42nd Annual Fall Meeting, Houston, TX. Lee, W.J., 1982. Well Testing. Textbook Series. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, TX, 159 pp. Lee, R.L., Logan, R.W. and Tek, M.R., 1987. Effect of turbulence on transient flow of real gas through porous media. SPE Formation Eval., 1(1): 1 0 8 - 120. Martinez R.N. and Ricoy, U., 1989. Sistema de an~.lisis de pruebas de presi6n en pozos petroliferos. Mexican Petroleum Institute, Internal Report, 75 pp. Martell, B., 1989. Personal communication, Pemex, M6xico, D.F. Matthews, C.S. and Russell, D.G., 1967. Pressure Buildup and Flow Tests in Wells. Monograph Series, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas, TX. Matthews, C.S., Brons, F. and Hazebroock, P., 1954. A method for determination of average pressure in a bounded reservoir. Trans. AIME, 201: 182 - 191. McDonald, S.W., 1983. Evaluation of production tests in oil wells stimulated by massive acid fracturing offshore Qatar. J. Petrol. Techn., 35(3): 4 9 6 - 506. McGee, P.R., 1980. Use of a well model to determine permeability layering from selective well test. J. Petrol. Techn., 32(11): 2023 - 2028. Mclntosh, I. and Baxendale, D., 1986. Offshore reservoirs-a different engineering approach is required. J. Can. Pet. Tech., 25(1): 28 - 38. McKinley, R.M., 1971. Wellbore transmissibility from after flow dominated pressure buildup data. J.Pet. Tech., 23(7): 863 - 872. McKinley, R.M., Vela, S. and Carlton, L.A., 1968. A field application of pulse-testing for datailed reservoir description. J. Petrol. Techn., 20(3): 3 1 3 - 321. Meinzer, O.E., 1928. Compressibility and elasticity of artesian aquifers. Econ. Geol., 23:263 - 271. Meunier, D., Wittmann, M.J. and Stewart, G., 1985. Interpretation of pressure buildup test using in-situ measurement of afterflow. J. Petrol. Techn., 37(1): 1 4 3 - 152. Millheim, K.K. and Cichowitz, L., 1968. Testing and analyzing low-permeability fractured gas wells. J. Pet. Tech., 20(2): 1 9 3 - 198; Trans. AIME, 243. Miller, C.C., Dyes, A.B. and Hutchinson, C.a.Jr., 1950. The estimation of permeability and reservoir pressure from bottom hole pressure build-up characteristics. Trans. AIME, 189:91 - 104. Miller, F.G., 1962. Theory of unsteady-state influx of water in linear reservoirs, J. Inst. Petrol. 48(467): 365-379. Mueller, T.D. and Witherspoon, P.A., 1965. Pressure interference effects within reservoirs and aquifers. J. Petrol. Techn., 17(4): 4 7 1 - 4 7 4 ; Trans. AIME, 234. Nabor, G.W. and Barham, R.H., 1964. Linear aquifer behavior. J. Petrol. Techn., 16(5): 561 - 563. Najurieta, H., 1980. A theory for pressure transient analysis in naturally fractured reservoirs. J. Pet. Tech., 32(7): 1241 - 1250. Najurieta, H.L., Duran, R., Samaniego V.F., Rodriguez, A., Martinez A.R. and P6rez Rosales, C., 1991. Transmissivity and diffusivity mapping from interference test data: a field example. SPE Formation Evaluation J., 10(3): 1 8 0 - 185. Nisle, R.G., 1958. The effect of partial penetration on pressure buildup in oil wells. Trans.AIME, 243:85 90. Odeh, A.S., 1965. Unsteady-state behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 5(1): 60 66. Onur, M. and Reynolds, A.C., 1988. A new approach for constructing type curves for well test analysis. SPE Formation Eval., 3(1): 197 - 206. Papatzacos, P., 1987. Approximate partial-penetration pseudoskin for infinite-conductivity wells. SPE Reservoir Eng., 2(2): 2 2 7 - 235. Pascal, H., 1981. Advances in evaluating gas well deliverability using variable rate tests under nonDarcy flow. Paper SPE 9841, SPE/DOE Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, CO, May 27 - 29. -
680 P6rez Rosales, C., 1979. Use of normal analysis in the description of heterogeneous reservoirs. Paper SPE 8431, 54th Annual Fall Technical Conference, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 2 6 - 29. Prats, M., Hazebroeck, P. and Strickler, W.R., 1962. Effect of vertical fractures on reservoir behavior compressible-fluid case. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 2(2): 8 7 - 94. Raghavan, R., 1977. Pressure behavior of wells intercepting fractures. Proc. Invitational Well-testing Symposium, Berkeley, CA, Oct. 19 - 21. Raghavan, R., 1980. Effect of producing time on type curve analysis. J. Petrol Techn., 32(6): 1053 - 1064. Raghavan, R. and Clark, K., 1975. Vertical permeability from limited entry flow tests in thick formations. Trans. AIME, 259:65 - 73. Raghavan, R., Scorer, D.T. and Miller, F.G., 1972.An investigation by numerical methods of the effect of pressure dependent rock and fluid properties on well flow tests. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 12(2): 267 - 276. Raghavan, R., Cady, G.C. and Ramey, H.J.Jr., 1972. Well test analysis for vertically fractured wells. J. Petrol. Techn., 24(8): 1014- 1020; Trans. AIME, 253. Ramey, HA.Jr., 1967. Application of the line source solution to flow in porous m e d i a - a review. Prod. Monthly, (May) 4 - 7:25 - 27. Ramey, H.J.Jr., 1970. Short-time well test data interpretarion in the presence of skin effect and wellbore storage. J. Petrol. Techn., 22(1): 97 - 104. Ramey, HA.Jr., 1974. Modern Well Test Analysis. Class notes, Stanford U, Stanford, CA. Ramey, H.J.Jr., 1982. Pressure transient testing. J. Petrol. Techn., 34(7): 1407 - 1413. Ramey, H.J.Jr., 1992. Advances in practical well-test analysis. J. Petrol. Techn., 44(6): 650 - 659. Ramey, HA.Jr. and Gringarten, A.C. 1975. Effect of high-volume vertical fractures on geothermal steam well behavior. Second U.N. Symposium on the Development and Use of Geothermal Resources, San Francisco, CA. Proc. Lawrence Berkeley Lab., Univ. of California, May 29. Ramey, H.J.Jr., Kumar, A. and Gulati, M.S., 1973. Gas Well Test Analysis Under Water-Drive Conditions. American Gas Association, Arlington, VA, 312 pp. Robinson, D.B., Macrygeorgas, C.A. and Govier, G.W., 1960. The volumetric behavior of natural gases containing hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide. Trans. AIME, 219: 5 4 - 60. Rosa, A.J. and Home, R.N., 1983. Automated type curve matching in well test analysis using Laplace space determination of parameters gradients. Paper SPE 12131, 59th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Francisco, CA, Oct. 5 - 8. Russell, D.G. and Truitt, N.E., 1964. Transient pressure behavior in vertically fractured reservoirs. J. Petrol. Techn., 16(10): 1159 - 1170. Sabet, M.A., 1991. Well Test Analysis. Gulf Publishing Co.Houston, TX, 460 pp. Schafer-Perini, A.L. and Miska, S.Z., 1986. Curve fitting of real-gas pseudopressure and its practical applications. Paper SPE 15034, 7th SPE Symposium on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, LA, Feb. 26 - 27. Samaniego, V.F., 1974. An Investigation of Transient Flow of Reservoir Fluids Considering Pressure Dependent Rock and Fluid Properties. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford CA, 212 pp. Samaniego, V.F. and Cinco Ley, H., 1989. Pressure transient analysis for naturally fractured gas reserv o i r s - field cases. SPE Formation Eval., 4(3): 4 4 5 - 4 5 3 . Samaniego, V.F. and Cinco Ley, H., 1989. On the determination of the pressure dependent characteristics of a reservoir through transient pressure testing. Paper SPE 19774, 64th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 8 - 11. Samaniego, V.F., Brigham, W.E. and Miller, F.G., 1977. An investigation of transient flow of reservoir fluids considering pressure dependent rock and fluid properties. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 17(1): 1 4 0 - 150. Samaniego, V.F., Cinco Ley, H. and Montiel H.D., 1985. Evaluation of naturally fractured gas reservoirs through pressure transient testing. Paper SPE 14359, 60th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 22 - 25. Samaniego, V.F., Cinco Ley, H. and Dominguez V.G.C., 1992. Fluid flow through carbonate systems. In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke, III (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part I. Elsevier, New York, pp. 439 - 503. Serra, K.V., Reynolds, A.C. and Raghavan, R., 1983. New pressure transient analysis methods for naturally fractured reservoirs. J. Petrol. Techn., 35(12): 2271 - 2283. Serra, K.V., P6rez, A.A.M. and Reynolds, A.C., 1987. Well test analysis for solution-gas-drive reservoirs, part II - buildup analysis. Paper SPE 17084, Eastern Regional Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, Oct. 21 -23.
681
Scott, J.O., 1963. The effect of vertical fractures on transient pressure behavior of wells. J. Petrol. Techn., 15(12): 1365 - 1369; Trans. AIME, 228. Simmons, J.F., 1986. Interpretation of underbalanced surge pressure data by rate-time convolution. Paper SPE 15477, 61st Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, Oct. 5 - 8. Simmons, J.F., 1990. Convolution analysis of surge data, J. Petrol. Techn., 42(1): 74 - 83. Standing, M.B., 1972. Formation damage and pseudo-skin factors-their effect on the productive capacity of wells. Standard Oil of California, Internal Report, 56 pp. Standing, M.B. and Katz, D.L., 1942. Density of natural gases. Trans. AIME, 146: 1 4 0 - 149 Stanislav, J.F. and Kabir C.S., 1990. Pressure Transient Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 287 pp. Stehfest, H., 1970. Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Communications of the A CM, 13(1): 4 7 49. Slider, H.C., 1971. A simplified method of pressure buildup analysis for a stabilized well. J. Petrol. Techn., 23(9): 1 1 5 5 - 1160. Streltsova, T.D., 1988. Well Testing in Heterogeneous Formations. John Wiley & Sons, NY, 413 pp. Streltsova, T.D., 1983. Well pressure behavior of a naturally fractured reservoir. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 23(5): 769-780. Strobel, C.J., Gulati, M.S. and Ramey, H.J.Jr., 1976. Reservoir limit tests in a naturally fractured reservoir - a field case study using type curves. J. Petrol. Techn., 28(9): 1097 - 1106. Strubhar, M., 1972. Causes of low productivity and identification of mechanisms. In: Production Operations Course H - Well Diagnosis. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas, TX. Theis, C.V., 1935. The relationship between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge using ground-water storage. Trans. AGU: 519. Tiab, D. and Kumar, A., 1980. Application of the p~ function to interference analysis. J. Petrol. Techn., 32(8): 1 4 6 5 - 1470. Tiab, D. and Kumar, A., 1980b. Detection and location of two parallel sealing faults around a well. J. Petrol. Techn., 32(10): 1 7 0 1 - 1709. Tsarevich, K.A. and Kuranov, I.F., 1956. Calculation of the flow rates for the center well in a circular reservoir under elastic conditions. Problems of Reservoir Hydrodynamics, part I, Leningrad, pp. 9 34. Vrbik, J., 1991. A simple approximation to the pseudoskin factor resulting from restricted entry. SPE Formation Eval., 6(4): 4 4 4 - 4 4 6 . Vadgana, U.N. and Arifi, N.A., 1981. Layer definition and pressure buildup case histories in a carbonate reservoir. Paper SPE 10263, 56th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX. van Everdingen, A.F., 1953. The skin effect and its influence on the productive capacity of a well. Trans. AIME, 198: 1 7 1 - 176. van Everdingen, A.F. and Hurst, W., 1949. The application of the Laplace transformation to flow problems in reservoirs. Trans. AIME, 186:305 - 324. van Everdingen, A.F., and Meyer, L.J., 1971. Analysis of buildup curves obtained after well treatment. J. Petrol. Techn., 23(4): 513 - 524; Trans. AIME, 251. van Golf-Racht, T.D., 1982. Fundamentals of Fractured Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 710 pp. Vela, S. and McKinley, R.M., 1970. How areal heterogeneities affect pulse-test results. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 10(2): 1 8 1 - 191. Warren, J.E. and Root, P.J., 1963. The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 3(3): 245-255. Wasson, J. and Mattar, L., 1983. Program gas well build-up t e s t - a field case illustration of solution through the use of combined techniques. J. Can. Pet. Tech., 22(1): 3 6 - 54. Wattenbarger, R.A. and Ramey, H.J.Jr., 1969. Well test interpretation of vertically fractured gas wells. J. Petrol. Techn., (May): 6 2 5 - 632; Trans. AIME, 246. Zana, E.T. and Thomas, G.W., 1970. Some effects of contaminants on real gas flow. J. Petrol. Techn., 2(9): 1157 - 1168.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
683
Chapter 7
NATURALLY-FRACTURED
CARBONATE
RESERVOIRS
T.D. VAN GOLF-RACHT
INTRODUCTION
A carbonate reservoir is defined as being "fractured" only if a continuous network of various degrees of fracturing is distributed throughout the reservoir. Such fractures formed naturally during the specific geological circumstances of reservoir history. On the other hand, the presence of some dispersed fractures induced by engineering stimulations in a carbonate rock will never transform a carbonate reservoir into a natural "fractured carbonate reservoir" (Fig. 7-1). The identification of a continuous fracture network in carbonate reservoirs is indicated by:
LOC
, )/'J
~
i~) l~
YDRAULICAI.LYUCED FRACTURES
AROUND WELLBORE
B
|
.i---
9
f
L
I
||
Fig. 7-1. Carbonate reservoir: (a) artificially fractured; (b) naturally fractured.
684 (1) significant mud losses during drilling operations, (2) special behavior of transient pressure analysis (e.g., double-slope curves), (3) cores examination, etc. But the true confirmation of the fractured character of a given reservoir results from certain specific features observed during the initial stage of field discovery as well as during the field development and production phase.
Specific features of the fractured carbonate reservoir Absence of the transition zone The transition zone, which is a key characteristic of low-permeable conventional limestone reservoirs (Fig. 7-2A), is absent in a fractured reservoir; nevertheless, the matrix is always of very low permeability. This is the direct consequence of the fact that the water-table and the gas-oil contact are both referred to fracture network fluids equilibrium where capillary pressure is negligible and the equilibrium of the two phases is controlled by gravity forces. The consequence is that in the absence of capillary forces, the two-fluid contact in the fracture network will always be horizontal and without any transition zone (Fig. 7-2B). On the contrary, in the presence of important capillary pressure the saturation distribution of various fluids in the matrix is totally different from that found in the fracture network. As a consequence, the "original" two-phase contacts in fractures can not be obtained through log data, which reflect essentially the matrix saturation distribution. Thus, the original gas-oil and water-oil contacts can be obtained only from the fluid levels monitored in observation wells. During the reservoir production history the levels have to be further determined through the same observation wells.
I: o o o o o
GAS
0
0
o
0
I
o
0
C~
o
0
__
~/////////~
,
gas-oil
0
0
G
0
A
0
0
S
o
0
0
o
0
transition zone. 9
_
_
.
_
O I L
F////////A
I;:
water-Oil
transition zone
.WATER "
i
. . . . . . . .
A
I .
.
-
t .
.
-.
-
.
.
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
WATER
_
_
.
.
_
.
-
.
B
Fig. 7-2. Reservoir transition zone in: (a) non-fractured carbonate reservoir and (b) fractured carbonate reservoir.
685 ~
..
o
"bO 0
_
.,, o, "~ 0
o (~ ~
o
_ - . . .
o~o
z~ 0
0 o ~ ,.,o Oo
. . . . . . . .
=--
~j
...
----
=
.
V~_u b ''~" o o
o
v--
o O+ o o O0 -~.o
-,--A----.~
-~t,,.~.
]
"I'
=
~
r-- ~r~ r
+ _._
gas-
_~.~0
"..
O
+"
000
I,~ D_ 4~. o
--,~-~ "
t'-"-,
c a p
9
C) O ,
~.~..~.
, r -~r
'
~" dPb - (-)
"
~-
dPI
Pb = const.
- . . . . . (+) dh
dh Fig. 7-3. Variation o f bubble point pressure (PB) vs. depth in a fractured reservoir.
The possibility of constant P VTproperties with depth In a reservoir's PVT properties the bubble point pressure gradient vs. depth relationships show a gradient ApB / Ah, which can be positive or negative. In the case of a fractured reservoir, if the fracture network has very good continuity (vertically and horizontally) a convection process may take place as a result of the combined effect of fluid thermal expansion and gravitational compression. With geologic time this convection process may make the hydrocarbon composition of the oil phase uniform, and thus, the bubble point pressure as well as all PVT properties may remain constant with depth as shown in Fig. 7-3. Pressure drop around a producing well is small for high rates In a fractured limestone reservoir the pressure drop around the wellbore is low (Fig. 7-4A) when compared with the large pressure drop in the absence of fractures, due to the usually very small permeability of the matrix (Fig. 7-4B). This behavior is due to the fact that: (1) fluid-flows toward the well in a fractured reservoir occur only through the fracture network because the matrix blocks feed only the fractures with fluid; (2) due to very high intrinsic permeability of fractures compared with that of matrix, high rates can be assured with very small pressure drops; and (3) small pressure drops required for high rates will favor the free gas buoyancy over a very large area (with the exception of a very restricted area around the wellbore).
686 g
itl
l
IL -
-F~cct
; ,.,i~,
..,'
i'.,"..;i. ....-.,. ~'~,-."
~
A
S~a1,cp ~ ~ , . . - - - . . - - . - - . .
----
9 '~.~." - . . I .....
. .:~;',~
l " : - :" .;. ...'a.'-,-'." FRACTURED RESERVOIR
.
-'..'
....
..?'.-:
.,,~
, , .9 ,":; ' . . ' # ;
.
. ' .'.
. ,. ... ' !
4
:,..': ". ::'.r ..':" ":.:i~
CONVENTIONAL RESERVOIR
13
Fig. 7-4. Pressure distribution around the wellbore in: (a) fracture carbonate reservoir and (b) non-fractured carbonate reservoir.
Fracture network gas-cap
Flow toward the well only through fractures with very low pressure gradients (Fig. 7-4A) facilitates a segregation of liberated gas toward the upper part of fracture networks, forming a "fracture gas-cap". In fact, with the exception of a zone of 10 m around the wellbore, in the entire drainage area the average density difference between oil and gas A~,g,o = 0.5.10 -3 {(kg/cm 2)/cm} is substantially higher than pressure gradients in the fractures. On the other hand, the flow of oil toward the well through rock matrix having low permeability (k = 1 mD.), in the absence of fractures, requires a high pressure drop, which gives rise to viscous forces substantially higher than gravity forces. Thus, the liberated gas will flow toward the well (Fig. 7-5B), without any gas segregation toward the gas-cap. Pressure decline
The rate of pressure decline per unit of oil produced ( A p / A N p ) is normally low in a fractured reservoir produced below bubble point pressure, when compared to the behavior of the same reservoir in the absence of fractures (Fig. 7-6, curve A). Such an improved behavior in a non-fractured reservoir (similar to a pressure maintenance) may be obtained only if a large amount of produced gas is reinjected back into the reservoir. If, for a given reservoir, one assumes two cases: (1) the reservoir is fractured, and (2) the reservoir is not fractured, then the last case may show a behavior similar to a fractured reservoir only if up to 80% of produced gas has been reinjected (Fig. 7-6, curve B).
687
G AS
CAP
w
C~
0~- O~
C~
0,, C~
0..~ C ~
0-,~. O-e, C)-~. O § C~
o~0-~
O~
0..~. ~
0...
o.~
0.~
o-~o-e
0-~
0-,-
O~
0"~" 0,~.
o-~
O + 0-~
o-~o.~ 0 " ~ (3~"
Fig. 7-5. Gas segregation is: possible in fractures (a) and impossible in the absence of fractures (b).
The explanation of this dramatic improvement of fractured reservoir behavior is the result of the additional different production mechanisms developing in a doubleporosity reservoirs. In the specific case of depletion (below bubble point pressure PB), such a substantial increase in recovery is the result of a "gas-gravity drainage" production mechanism developed by the segregation of liberated gas. Gas/oil ratio
The reservoir gas-oil ratio (GOR) vs. recovery is substantially lower in a fractured carbonate reservoir than in an unfractured reservoir (Fig. 7-7B). This difference is due mainly to the tendency of the liberated gas to rapidly segregate through fractures towards the top of the reservoir (Fig. 7-5A), instead of flowing toward the well together with the oil (Fig. 7-5B). If the wells are then completed in only the lower part of the reservoir, the gas will be retained in the upper part and the GOR will remain very small when compared to the equivalent values found during conventional reservoir depletion. Water~oil ratio
The water/oil ratio or the water-cut during the production life of a fractured carbonate reservoir is essentially a function of production rate (Fig. 7-8A), whereas in the case of a non-fractured reservoir both ratios will depend on rock characteristics, fluid characteristics, displacement behavior and, evidently, on production rate (Fig. 7-8B).
FRACTURING VS. GEOLOGICAL HISTORY
The evaluation of fracturing in carbonate reservoirs requires examination of the present information obtained from field work (wells, cores, etc.) and the attempt to
688
IRESERVOIR 9
N
[AP/ANp] r~ON-F~CrUREDRESERVOIR
i
,
Non fractured
Fractured
J Pressure decline becomes equivalent to fractured pressure decline IF Gas produced
NIILlll."
.... oo_] ~'~njelted
Fig. 7-6. Variation of pressure decline vs. recovery [Ap / ANp ] in: (a) fractured carbonate reservoir and (b) non-fractured carbonate reservoir. correlate them with the past history of a reservoir. The main aspects on which the work has to be directed are: (1) geological conditions of fracturing; and (2) influence of stylolites and joints.
689
t
t
0
0
%RECOVERY
--~
A
%RECOVERY --~
B
Fig. 7-7. GOR vs. recovery in: (a) fractured carbonate reservoir and (b) non-fractured carbonate reservoir.
Geological condition offracturing From a geo-mechanical point of view, fractures in a fractured carbonate reservoir correspond to a solid surface in which a loss of cohesion has taken place and a rupture with no noticeable displacement is observed. Under the same stresses, fracturing resuiting from tectonic events will be different in different types of rocks. Fracturing will be more efficient, for example, in brittle reservoir rocks of low porosity and low permeability, where the fractures are relatively extended and have large openings. These are called macrofractures. In less brittle rocks of high porosity, the fractures are of limited extent and have relatively small openings. These are called "microfractures" or "fissures". Fractures which are generated as a result of the stress that reduces rock cohesion can be attributed to various geological events, such as: (1) diastrophism in the case of folding and/or faulting; (2) expansion of upper part of sediments as a result of consistent erosion associated with the removal of the overburden, which causes a differential stress on the rock through the planes of weakness; (3) rock volume shrinkage as a result of water loss in shale or shaly sands; and (4) rock volume shrinkage in the case of temperature variation in igneous rocks.
Review of classic laboratoryfracturing experiments In classic laboratory testing, a cylindrical sample is subjected to the axial maximum principal stress (eye) acting along the cylinder axis, and tO a lateral confining pressure (so that the two minimum stresses (3"2 and cy3 are equal) directed normal to the cylinder axis (Fig. 7-9). A hydrostatic pressure equal to the confining pressure is initially applied and then the axial loading is increased while the confining pressure is kept constant. This combined state of stress vs. deformation has been extensively debated in the literature. The main result of this procedure is that the yield and ultimate strength increase as the
690 A 100% f
/
/
/
WATER CUT (WC)
/
/ / I , I
,
q (rate) B
100%
/
WATER CUT (WC)
/
/I
I i
I I
I / I //, / // I/7 lJ,
/
/
/
!
Breakthrough
Water encroachment (We)
wc = f (Po, law,ko, kw) Fig. 7-8. Water-cut vs. recovery in: (a) fractured carbonate reservoir and (b) non-fractured carbonate reservoir. confining pressure increases. An example is shown in Fig. 7-10 where, for different confining pressures, the differential stress o~ - o 3 is plotted vs. longitudinal strain. As illustrated, the shape of the curves cr~- o 3 vs. e I is influenced by confining pressure. At a low confining pressure a brittle fracture is obtained with an evident strength drop when failure occurs, whereas for a high confining pressure a large deformation may occur without any strength drop. As illustrated in Fig. 7-11, fracture patterns are very much influenced by the confining pressure ~3, when the principal stress cr~ initiates the fracturing of the sample. The fractures are developed at cr3 > 35 kg/cm 2, whereas conjugate fractures are developed when o 3 > 210 kg/cm 2. This can be summarized as follows:
691
0 1
--.....
f
J
f \.____.J
l Fig. 7-9. Triaxial test for a cylindrical specimen (axial compression 0"1 and fluid confining pressure 0"2 = 0"3)-
2500~
o,
2O:X)-
b-
IS00-
~
~_.._.......___-----
.---
~ -
C3
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
m-i
700J
Numbers indicate
t 350
conftning pressure
/,60
~
'I000-.
-__o___~_~.
1000~I
~
210
\ 3s
0
j
in Kg/cm2
" ~ ~00 ,
,~
1
2
,
89 Strain,
,
•I ('I'1
Fig. 7-10. Differential stress 0-t- 0-2vs. strain for various confining pressures. 0 < 0"3 < 30 kg/cm 2 35 < 0"3 • 150 kg/cm 2 150 < o 3 < 400 kg/cm 2 0"3 ) 400 kg/cm 2
-
irregular fracture net and visible fracture abundant conjugate fractures no fractures
As shown, when confining pressures are around 2 5 0 - 400 kg/cm 2, conjugate fractures are developed for the same unique axial stress. If the fractures are observed on a folded structure as shown in Fig. 7-12, it may be stated that right lateral and left lateral fractures form at angles of 60 ~ This happens as a result of maximum shear
692
~3:35
a3:0
~3 = I00 ~,,
_
~3 : 210 1
v
case 1
cose
o 3 = 350 \
,
.
2
case
(x 3 : 700 .
.
.
3
cy3 : 1000 /
v -
case
C
case
5
Fig. 7-11. Triaxial testing results for various confining pressures cr3 in kg/cm 2.
stress which makes an angle of 30 ~ (angle of intemal friction) with each lateral conjugate fracture. The important advantage of such a fracture pattem is that it is sufficient to know only one orientation of a single fracture system in order to define the entire pattern of stress distribution during fracturing over geological time. On the contrary, orthogonal fractures having an intersection angle of 90 ~ will be the result of more than one single state of stress, even if it is not excluded that the fracturing occurred at the same geological time for both orthogonal fracture groups.
Folding vs. fracturing In a folded structure, fractures can not be associated with a single state of stress (as in the case of faulting), but rather, to several states of stress which may occur during
693
/,..Right lateral
0~
Conjugate
/
Transversal fracture
'
Left lat
/_.__._ Orthogonal
fractures
fractures
/Folding axis
Fig. 7-12. Conjugate and orthogonal fractures referred to the folding axis.
the folding history. The folding examples shown in Figs. 7-13 and 7-14 represent the greatest principal stress acting parallel and acting normal to formation bedding. In Fig. 7-13 the lateral stress 01 acts only on one side of the bed (Y) and is practically immobile on the other side (Y'). The folding will, therefore, generate a series of fractures as a result of both stresses (compression and tension). Figure 7-14 presents the case where a 1 acts vertically as a result of salt dome rising. The structure is uplifted and the reservoir layers are under compressional and tensional stresses. During the folding process a series of fracture patterns are generated under various conditions of distribution of the principal stress. Of these patterns, two have been retained as the most important and are described below. Pattern 1
In the case of pattern 1 (Fig. 7-15) the three principal stresses work in the following directions: a 1 and o 3 along the bedding plane and a 2 normal to the bedding plane.
O'2 or o"3
/o r 5"2.
0"i
Fig. 7-13. Folding compression.
694
sort domes
o"3 1
Fig. 7-14. Folding due to salt dome uplift. Due to the direction of the greatest principal stress o I along structural dip, a series of transversal fractures and respective conjugate fractures will develop. This observation is of major interest when studying outcrop data in a folded structure. Based on the observed conjugate fractures, it becomes possible to understand what direction o, had during folding, and also to establish the normal direction in the same bedding plane where a 1 was applied. The dip of the anticline is then given by o~ and the strike is given by the direction of o 3.
Pattern 2 Fracture pattern 2 (Fig. 7-16) is similar to pattern 1, with a 2 being normal to the bedding plane and a~ and a 3 acting in the bedding plane. The only difference is that the greatest principal stress a, acts in a direction parallel to the folding axis. Therefore, the result will be a series of conjugate fractures which will indicate that a~ is
~o I
.0" 3
Fig. 7-15. Fracture pattern 1: cr1, cr3is acting in the bedding plane and o-2acting normal to the bedding plane (not shown) tyl is in the dip direction; ty3is in the strike direction. (From Steams and Friedman, 1972.)
695
Fig. 7.16. Fracture pattern 2: 0-1,0-3acting in the beding plane and 0-2acting normal to the bedding plane (0-3is in a dip direction and % is in a strike direction). (From Steams and Friedman, 1972.) along the longitudinal direction (strike), whereas the lowest principal stress 0" 3 will indicate the direction of dip. A shortening and elongation will occur on the anticline folding in these two cases. The shortening due to o~ will be in a dip direction in pattern 1 and in a strike direction in pattern 2, and vice-versa for the elongation. Except for fracturing, no change such as shortening or elongation normal to bedding will occur.
Examples Steams and Friedman (1972) have mentioned a series of examples of these two patterns and have made a number of observations: (1) The two pattems may be developed in the same bed. (2) In general, pattern 1 will precede pattern 2, which means that folding must develop to a sufficient degree so that fracturing can occur. In such a case fractures will be normal to the anticline trend. (3) The fractures of pattern 1 are often developed on long distances such as single breaks. In general, the fractures are large, with a homogeneous orientation, a feature which may aid fluid movement over large areas. (4) The fractures of pattern 2 are of reduced length, often varying between a few inches and a few feet. The fractures are aligned with the folding axis and usually contain fractures in all three principal directions. (5) The extension fractures in pattern 1 may terminate in lateral fractures (left or right), and the shear fractures may terminate in extension fractures or in their conjugates. (6) Without being demonstrated, it seems that there are more chances of having a better continuity of a single or very few fractures in the case of pattern 1, but a larger fracture density and more effective fluid flow in the case of pattern 2. (7) In a well which may intersect pattern 1 fractures, there are three possible directions for the well to intersect the fractures, whereas if a well intersects pattern 2 the direction parallel to the structural trend will be the most probable communication direction between the well and the fractures.
696
Role of stylolites and joints In fractured carbonate reservoirs, both joints and stylolites have considerable influence on reservoir quality. Stylolites occur as irregular planes of discontinuity passing through the rock matrix, generally roughly parallel to bedding (Fig. 7-17 illustrates the main types), and their presence normally reduces the intercommunicability of the reservoir fracture system (Park and Schott, 1968). Understanding the importance of stylolites to fractured reservoirs depends more on understanding the timing of their origin relative to that of fracturing and hydrocarbon migration than on their actual origin. Joints are more common than stylolites, and are normally associated with the structural history of the area and may be used successfully for the interpretation of angularity to the principal stresses, resulting in regional folding and faulting trends.
Stylolites and stylolitization The presence of stylolites in carbonate rocks is a common feature independent of rock facies and geological age. In general, they are easily recognizable as irregular planes of discontinuity or sutures, along which two rock units appear to be interlocked or mutually interpenetrating (Dunnington, 1967). These planes are usually characterized by the accumulation of insoluble residue which forms the stylolite seams; they may terminate laterally or converge into residual clay seams. The presence of stylolites and reprecipitated cements, especially if continuous, causes considerable reduction in reservoir quality because they act as barriers to the
a
i 1
3
I
I HORIZONTAL TYPE
4
TYPE
HORIZONTAL- INCLINED
5
< VERTICAL TYPE
INTERCONNECTED TYPE
VERTICA L -INCLINED
Fig. 7-17. Classification of stylolites vs. bedding. (Park and Schott; reprinted with permission of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
697 A
C
B
Fig. 7-18. Schematic diagram of stylolitization with thinning. hydrodynamic system, intergranular pores, and fracture networks. Although the origin of stylolites has in the past given rise to considerable debate, it is now generally accepted as being the result of either a contraction-pressure process or a pressure-dissolution process. In the case of a pressure-dissolution process, stylolitization could be simplified as shown in Fig. 7-18. The original grains of phase "A", due to increasing fluid pressure (as a result of increasing overburden with deepening burial), will reach a state of high solubility which will be greatest at the grain extremities and point-to-point contacts between grains. Phase "B" in Fig. 7-18 represents the carbonate material which will be transported, and if dissolution continues, the new phase "C" will be reached.
Stylolitization vs. compaction As discussed, stylolitization is the only process other than erosion which introduces changes in volume and shape of carbonate rocks after initial induration. Stylolites influence bulk volume, porosity, and often permeability. In addition, they may be often a source of microfractures (Dunnington, 1967). In hard rocks such as limestones, after initial rock induration when fluid (water) reaches a critical pressure, the stylolitization process could be developed as a function of burial depth. Joints and their formation Joints are considered to be structural features, but their origin remains controversial. In general, theories concerning their formation are associated with the observation and interpretation of the more obvious features, such as parallelism, angular relations between joint sets, and other structural features (folds and faults). Joints are systematic when they occur in sets where the respective composing joints are parallel or sub-parallel. In addition, one joint set may intersect other joint sets. Joints can also be non-systematic, in which case they are less oriented and more randomly distributed. Curvilinear patterns are the most representative of non-systematic joints. The following list helps to distinguish systematic and non-systematic joints: Systematic Joints occur as planar traces on surfaces - occur as broadly curved surfaces - occur on oriented surface structures
-
Non-systematic Joints meet but do not cross other joints are strongly curved in plan view terminate at bedding surfaces
-
-
-
698 Joints are roughly equidistant, and in thin-bedded rocks, they extend across many layers. Very few of them, however, completely extend through very thick units. The main characteristic of joints is their parallelism, i.e., they are grouped into sets, with each joint being parallel or sub-parallel to the other.
Fracture evaluation Evaluation of fractures in fractured carbonates are carried out continuously, starting during the exploration phase and continuing during the production phase. The material for observation is in general provided by outcrops (whenever such is the case) and cores obtained from drilling. The examination of fractures requires a certain definition and classification in relation to purely descriptive criteria, and with the relationship of fracturing to geological history. The classification shown in Table 7-I is based on descriptive criteria, where fractures are defined and classified according to the following categories: - open/closed fractures - macro/micro fractures natural/induced fractures -
The open and closed fractures depend mainly on circulating water and subsequent cement precipitation, which may plug the open fracture. It is also very important to remember that due to rock compressibility, closed fractures in outcrops may often be open in the subsurface reservoir as a result of high reservoir pressure-fluid action on keeping the fracture walls separated. The fractures and fissures, called macro- and microfractures, respectively, are of different lengths and widths, the first group being of larger extension and opening. In qualifying fractures it is extremely important to recognize natural fractures from artificially induced ones: clean, fresh fractures have less chances of being natural fractures than oil-impregnated ones, which are certainly natural ones. Table 7-11 presents a classification of fractures based on geological criteria. Inasmuch as an essential role in generating fractures is played by tectonic events, fractures are dependent on folding processes and type of folding history, including stratigraphical conditions and stress state, as well as the actual folding characteristics. The various types of fractures generated by folding and stress are shown in Fig. 7-19. The totality of the fractures (Table 7-11 and Fig. 7-19) could be associated with their direction and, therefore: (1) the fracture system is formed by all fractures having mutually the same parallel direction; and (2) the fracture network results from the presence of several fracture systems.
Basic characterization of a "single fracture" and of a "group of fractures "' The main differences between a single fracture and group of fractures are related to the direct characteristics of a single fracture such as size, width, orientation, etc., and to combined characteristics of matrix/fractures in the case of a group of fractures (such as fracture distribution, fracture density, fracture intensity, etc.).
699 TABLE 7-I Classification of fractures based on descriptive criteria
OPEN
i c,o o 1
i
free for fluid flow I
plugged w i t h p re ci p i ta te s MICROFRACTURES
MACROFRACTURES .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I .
.
.
9small width 9n o n extended
9w i d t h > ~t 9very extended
[FRACTURESLi
!
measurable
I
[ n~ ! .
(visible)
"ATUAL-, ,!
!
,
_
too small (Invisible)
[ -.'NDUCED- ]
§
9 clean, fresh
9partlally.,,~ plugged 9t o t a l l y . ~ 9parallel w i t h other
9parallel-,~ to core axis 9normal
fractures .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A group of fractures implies the following two main categories: (1) fracture systems formed by a comprehensive set of parallel fractures; and (2) fracture networks formed by two or several associated systems. Often in an idealized reservoir the network is structured through two or three orthogonal fracture systems. Single fracture parameters refer to intrinsic characteristics, such as opening (width), size and nature of the fracture. If the single fracture is associated with the reservoir environment, another essential characteristic, such as fracture orientation, has to be defined. The multi-fracture parameters refer to fracture arrangement (geometry) which further generates the matrix bulk unit, called the "matrix block". The number of fractures and their orientation are directly related to fracture distribution and density. When fracture density is related to lithology, another parameter of particular interest, called "fracture intensity", is obtained.
Single fracture parameters Fracture opening or fracture width is represented by the distance between fracture walls. The width of the opening may depend (in reservoir conditions) on depth, pore pressure, and type of rock. Fracture width varies between 1 0 - 200 microns, but statistics have shown that the most frequent range is between 1 0 - 40 microns. Fracture orientation is the parameter which connects the single fracture to the
TABLE 7-II
Classification of fractures based on geological criteria
.
.
.
LONGITUDINAL TRANSVERSAL DIAGONAL
.
/ STRESS STATE
ASSOCIATED WITH
CONJUGATE NON-CONJUGATE
STRATIGRAPHY ~ F I R S T ORDER SECOND ORDER i
.
.
.
.
i
.
i
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
_~
i
_
i
along the ~- perpendicular lo conjugate to the
folding axis
forming an angle of 60" with stress orthogonal
cutting several layers cutting one
layer
701 CONJUGATE RIGHT DIAGONAL FRACTURE
\
CONJUGATE LEFTr, DIAGONAL FRACTURE
TRANSVERSE IFRACTURE
LONGITUDINAL FRACTURE
HORIZONTAL STYLOLITE VERTICAL STYLOLITE
Fig. 7-19. Various types of fractures generated by folding.
environment. The fracturing plane can be defined (as in classic geological practice) by two angles, dip azimuth and dip angle (Fig. 7-20). From examination of the orientation of various single fractures it follows that all parallel fractures belong to a single fracture system. If more intercommunicating fracture systems are recognized in a reservoir, then those systems together will constitute the fractured reservoir network.
Group offractures parameters In a fracture network which contains two or more fracture systems, each system has been generated by a different stress (except in the case of conjugate fractures). Fracture distribution is then expressed by a fracturing degree factor. This factor is stronger if there is a continuous intercommunication among the fractures in a system and if the systems are equivalent to each other. In addition, the fracturing degree will be weaker if the intercommunication among the fracture systems is interrupted and if the fracturing of one system prevails over the other (Ruhland, 1975). Figure 7-21 shows several cases where two orthogonal fracture systems can be equivalent as in case 1, or with the predominance of one of the systems as in cases 2 and 3. The magnitude of predominance or its absence can be expressed by an equivalent fracturing degree in examples of Fig. 7-21. In addition, the fracture density delineates matrix blocks of different sizes as a
702
y+ b-
fracture
width
L-
fracture
length
co - d i p a n g l e / /
8 - azimuth
ABC - p l a n e c o n t a i n i n g the fracture
SINGLE FRACTURE Fig. 7-20. Single fracture orientation.
result of fracture distribution (case 1 compared with case 2) (Ruhland, 1975). Fracture density expresses the frequency of fractures along a given direction, and reciprocally, the extension of the matrix delimited by fractures encountered. The intersection of several orthogonal fracture systems results in single matrix blocks of different sizes and shapes. In fact, along the direction X the linear fracture density (LFD) is [LFD]x = number of fractures / length (along a certain direction) = n / / L x
(7-1)
and, reciprocally, the block length between two fractures L x can be determined as follows: Lx = n//[LFD]x
(7-2)
Based on this approach, some idealized block shapes (Reiss, 1966) resulting from various distributions of fractures in an orthogonal fracture network gives several fracture density values (Fig. 7-22). The blocks can be structured as elongated slides (No. 1) or matches offering only one permeability direction (Nos. 2 and 3), and finally, cubes having one flowing direction (Nos. 4 and 5) or two flowing directions (No. 6) When a single-layer productive zone is small, in order to discern the tectonic effect vs. lithology it is necessary to refer all fractures (vertical and subvertical) to the singlelayer pay. If the pay is larger and fractures are vertical (or sub-vertical) and horizontal (or sub-horizontal), the notion of fracture intensity can be introduced as the ratio between the vertical and horizontal fracture densities: FINT = (LFD V / LFDH) =
= Linear fracture density (vertical) / Linear fracture density (horizontal)
(7-3)
703
|
|
Q
\/ \J
J x J
/
f\
/\/
/
EQUIVALENT SYSTEM
-~ / \
\
\J
/ EQUIVALENT SYSTEM
PREDOMINANT SYSTEM
.........
WEAK
FRACTURING DEGREE
Fig. 7-21. Various combinations of orthogonal fracture systems and the qualitative evaluation of the fracturing degree. (From Ruhland, 1975.) where vertical and horizontal fractures may in certain cases be interpreted also as fractures that are normal and parallel to the stratification. In an orthogonal fracture network oriented along the three orthogonal axes, the fracture intensity will be the ratio of fracture density in the plane XOY to the fracture density in the plane XOZ. The number of fractures can be observed and counted along a plane normal to fracture direction. As an example, the number of fractures oriented in direction Z (Fig. 7-23A) are counted in the plane XOY so that: Vertical fracture density = L F D V = L F D Z = n / L and the number of fractures oriented in direction X (Fig. 7-23B) is counted in the plane YOZ, which will give: x
x
Horizontal fracture density = L F D H = L F D X = n / L z
z
This will further result in fracture intensity: (7-4)
F I N T = L F D Z / L F D X = (n x / Lx) / (n / Lz)
and the matrix block dimensions: Zbt = L z / n z = 1 / L F D X = 1 / L F D H Xbz = L x / n x = 1 / L F D Z = 1 / L F D V
or expressed as a ratio of matrix dimensions: F I N T = L F D Z / L F D H = (1 /
Xbl )//(1
/ Zbt)
= Zbl // Xbl
(7-5)
704 L.F.D. Slides Matches Matches Cube Cube Cube
I ! [ 2 [ 3 4_ 5
I I i I
1/a 1/a 2/a 2/a ] 1/a 2/a
/ SLIOES
MAICHES
@
CuBE 5
Fig. 7-22. Simplified geometrical matrix blocks. (From Reiss, 1966.)
FINT values show a relationship between vertical and horizontal fracture distributions and also give an indication about the matrix block shape as presented on Table 7-III: vertically elongated ("match" shape), horizontally elongated ("slab" shape), and/or cubes.
Simplified correlation and procedures A complex fracture-matrix structure geometry could be modified to a simplified geometrical shape of matrix block (parallelepipeds, cubes, spheres, etc.), which is evidently surrounded by uniform fractures. Various block geometries are shown in Fig. 7-22 (named slides, matches, and cubes) with their sizes and shapes related to
705
nX 9 9 1 4 99 1 7 69
A ~
~ ~149176
~176
9~
9
9176
o 9176176176 9 9
9
V e r t i c a l f r a c t u r e density
u
LFD V = L F D Z X
--~
LFDZ = n
x / LX
i LFDH = LFDX
NF
--~
LFDX = n
z
/
LZ
9176176176176176149176176
76149 9 9 1 4 9 1 7 6 1 7 6 1... ~ ~
nz
9 9
~ ~
~ ~
I Z
Fig. 7-23. Vertical (a) and horizontal (b) fracture density 9
fracture density at various fracturing directions. For example, if the horizontal fracture density is smaller than vertical fracture density, then the block will be an elongated parallelepiped, and if vice-versa, the block will be a flat parallelepiped.
Shape and block magnitude The dimension of a matrix is directly related to fracture density and intensity because an increase of fracture density in one direction represents a reduction of block dimensions along the same direction. The block shape vs. fracture intensity is expressed through a comprehensive diagram (Fig. 7-24) where the basic relationship in two directions is expressed as follows:
706 TABLE 7-11I Relationship between vertical/horizontal fracture density and matrix block shape. ,,
i
CASE 1
CASE 2 i
Vertical Horizontal Vertical Denslty ) Denslty Density
i
i
i
CASE 3 i
i
i i
i
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Density Density < Density
i
LFDZ > LFDX
LFDZ = LFDX
LFDZ
<
FINT >
FINT = 1
FINT
< 1
ZBL,
< I
1
ZBL >
ZBL
= 1
.,
XBL
XBL
I / ! ! J l
i l
l l
/ / / / .
.
.
.
z at 2 2 2 ) .
/"
.
.
i"
.
J"
XBL
zoL
l
l
LFDX
J"
XBL
Xat.
VERTICALLY
ELONGATED
XBL
ELONGATED
MRTClt ....
j
II
L F D V = L F D Z = 1/Xbt L F D H = L F D X = 1/Zbt F I N T = L F D Z / L F D X = Zbt / Xbt
(7-6)
where Zbt and Xbt are representing block height and extension, respectively. By using a double logarithm diagram and plotting in the same scale LFDV on the ordinate and LFDH on the abscissa (Fig. 7-24), the diagonal lines will represent the FINT values. This is a simple way to generalize the relationship of shape to size of matrix blocks.
707 The cube is on the diagonal if both scales have the same basic values. For constant values of LFDV, the increase in LFDH represents the increase in the horizontal fracture density, which corresponds to the same block base and a reduction of the block height (block will become increasingly flatter) and FINT is <1. Inversely, if the LFDH frequency remains constant but the vertical fracture LFDV increases, then the blocks will become more and more elongated with increasing LFDV (FINT is > 1) and thus, their height will be kept constant while their base is reduced as an effect of the abundance of vertical fractures. At limit their shape is that of a thin column similar to a pencil. The shape/size relationship of an idealized block unit, related to a single-layer pay and a variable vertical fracture density, shows the variation between vertically elongated and horizontally extended block elements. The idealization of a block unit is developed under the following procedure: (1) Each single matrix block extension is laterally delineated by vertical fracture density (assuming that subvertical fractures are vertical) and vertically delineated either by the matrix height between two consecutive horizontal fractures or by the layer height in the absence of horizontal fractures in the single layer. 10
.Ivn 3
2
"
lo 2
'/ /
,,,..
-
,'
n.
lO ,
E
1
4
vq
/ I
/'1
/ ~ ,i~//, \'-/ //
I
//
10' '"
i,
U3 c" (:D
--J
(J 03
//
6'
//
//
(D ::3 LL_
/
/// iO ~
/
,,, 1 0 .2
,q,
//
//
/ i /
///
// c_ a3
/
/// /
/
// (.D ..t-J
'10-1
//
10-':"
-
// // // -2'l~
I0
/
~r_ 2
I0
i
/// o
10
/
///
j,,"
-,
10
//
//
/
,,,'10
,m
,
I0
'
2
10
LFDH Horizontal
fracture
density
Fig. 7-24. Block of matrix resulting from the intersection of an orthogonal fracture system.
FINT
708 (2) The vertical number ( n ) of fractures estimated through observations on cores, I if combined with number (nh) of layer of different pay, can be used for a preliminary approximation of the matrix block shape: (7-7)
FINT = LFDV/ LFDH = nI / n h Q u a n t i t a t i v e f r a c t u r e evaluation
Based on the diagram Fig. 7-18, the matrix block magnitude can be evaluated for various cases: The c u b e ' s m a g n i t u d e :
(1) If FINT = 1 ==>> then it is normal to find a cube because F I N T = 1 means L F D V = L F D Z = 1
Xbt = Zbt = 1
(7-8)
(2) The cube could change its dimensions if fracture density is changed as shown in the examples presented below: if F I N T = 1 but L F D V = L F D Z = 10-'
Xbl = Zbt = 10
(7-9)
The cube in this case is 10 times greater, whereas: if F I N T = 1 but L F D V = L F D Z = 10
Xbt = Zbl = O. 1
(7-10)
the cube in this case is 10 times smaller. The c u b e ' s deformation: The transformation of cubes into matches corresponds to the case of a constant LFDH and increasing LFDZ, which results in blocks of constant height but with reduced base related to the growing LFDV values. By analogy, the cubes become slabs when LFDV remains constant and LVDH increases, which resuits in slabs having the same base but with continuous reduction of block height as a result of LFDH growth. Qualitative f r a c t u r e evaluation through F I N T
Based on FINT definition, a qualitative interpretation could be made for shape and fracturing: Shape
FINT > 1 [Matches]
FINT = 1 [Cubes]
FINT < 1 [Slabs]
Degree of fracturing
FINT FINT FINT FINT FINT
> = = = =
0.05 0.1 5 - 10 2 0 - 50 > 100
==> ==> ==> ==> ==>
Fractured zone Average fractured zone Strongly fractured zone Very fractured zone Breccia
709
Data processing of fractures The observations of fractures gathered from cores are tabulated and then processed through various criteria. The characteristics to be gathered are: Lithology vs. hardness
- - - > rock hardness
Lithology vs.
--->
Fracture Characteristics
=> => -> =>
Soft Medium-hard Hard Very-hard
Presence of shales Presence of stylolites Orientation of the bedding planes ==> ==> ==> ==> ==>
fracture opening, size fracture orientation (dip, azimuth, angle) fracture density fracture intensity matrix block dimensions
Statistical representation The information obtained from core examination (to which may be added the results obtained from indirect measurements) can be processed through statistical diagrams or pure geometric representations. The data which usually are processed are: fracture width, size, nature, orientation, distribution, block unit, fracture density, and fracture intensity. The criteria through which various results are examined may be: depth, lithology, shaliness, pay magnitude, etc. The most representative models are the following: (1) statistical models, which include histograms and statistic stereograms. The histogram based on single-parameter values selected through adequate criteria indicates the most probable average parameter by using a frequency curve. The stereograms are used mainly for fracture orientation parameters (strike, dip angle, etc.), through which the preferential directions of the fractures are shown; (2) geometric models (especially in the case of matrix block units), using a stereographic projection approach for magnitude and shape. Polar stereograms and various other schematic representations are particularly useful in the identification of the preferential trends of certain parameters, which often help in the description of the properties for large groups of fractures; (3) histograms, which are used for the evaluation of the most frequent range of the variations of a given parameter. The data are generally collected in relation to a given criterion, such as lithology, or pay interval, or number of cores, or types of fractures, etc. Histograms are applied to almost all parameters which define single fracture or multi-fractures characterization. From the frequency curve and cumulative frequency curve the range of average values of a given parameter is obtained by a conventional procedure. A typical example is given in Fig. 7-25 where the cumulative frequency vs. fractured density LFDV is examined for shaly and non-shaly samples. As can be
710 SHALY SAMPLES 11021
25 z w 0
I00 >." o z 80 w
i
I,--
20
0
w Q- 15 >.. Z ill
I0
0 W
S
6(1 "-
Z
U-w L)
~0 w ~ 20
m
<
LL 0
0
0
3.5
2O
,0
40
3O
99
NON-SHALY SAMPLES (2601 ,,
25
100 >... (3 Z
I,,,--
Z w 20 n,ILl r 15
. ~ . . _ -
.
BRECCIATED
0 Z I0 LU
0 LU rl," LL
(3
15~
80 W =) O
60 ~ Z
U-W
~0 w ~ ~LU
.,
20
5
0
6
10
LfD(NUMBER
20 OF
30 FRACTURES
A0 PER
90 99
<
0
FOOT)
Fig. 7-25. Example of frequency curves of linear fracture density, for shaly and non-shaly samples.
observed, for 50% cumulative frequency of fracture density in non-shaly samples (6 fractures/foot) is greater than the one observed in shaly samples (3 fractures/foot). In addition, breccia develops only in non-shaly samples; and (4) stereograms, a representation using circles in order to define over 360 ~ the spatial position of the fractures, whereas the magnitude of fracture characteristics is measured on circle radii (Fig. 7-26).
PHYSICAL
PROPERTIES
OF FRACTURES
AND MATRIX
The physical characteristic of fractures and matrix are essentially contrasting since fractures have low porosity and high permeability, whereas matrix shows high porosity and low permeability. As a result, in dynamic conditions the fracture network will exhibit a small storage capacity, and thus, a very short transient time owing to its high permeability, whereas the matrix will exhibit a large storage capacity associated with a long transient time resulting from its low permeability. In addition, if the flow includes several phases, the fluid properties and complex reservoir rock characteristics, such as relative permeabilities and capillary pressure vs. saturation relationships (Leroy, 1976; Van Golf-Racht, 1982), makes the process very complex for the double-porosity systems, requiring new reservoir dynamic concepts.
711
O*
0 = 25% 1"=
N 270 ~ 2 5 " / . ~ 2 0
15 ,
10
10%
1 0 - - - - - - 15 ~ ' - - - 2 0 - - - - - 2 5 "/. 90 ~ E
/
r i - - ~ - 25 "/, ItS0~
2Fig. 7-26. Example o f fracture strike projected in a statistic stereogram (example).
Porosity and permeability in fractured carbonate reservoirs Porosity The double porosity of a fractured reservoir is formed by matrix "intergranular porosity" (similar to the conventional porosity of a porous media) and by "fracture porosity" often called "secondary porosity" (expressing the void volume of vugs and/ or fractures). The secondary porosity is developed in a later phase, after the porosity is in place as a result of mechanical geological processes (discussed above) or/and chemical geological processes (i.e., dissolution, diagenesis, etc.).
712
Porosity of matrix and fractures." Total and single porosity are related by the classic definition: Total porosity = Matrix porosity + Fracture porosity (Primary porosity) + (Secondary porosity) Total voids/Total bulk = Matrix voids/Total bulk + Fracture voids/Total bulk
CY- r "[" r
(7-11)
(7-12')
Inasmuch as secondary porosity ~2 = r << Cm Total bulk volume = matrix bulk volume VB = VBm
(7-12")
or CT~r
(7-13)
Storage capacity of matrix and fractures." In transient flowing conditions the term which plays an impor/ant role is not the single porosity (r m or r f ), but rather, the storage capacity expressed by the association of porosity and compressibility. In this case the product r becomes: Cm*C m--------~>~>for the matrix storage capacity r *CI ====>> for the fracture storage capacity
Order of magnitude of fracture porosity: In general, fracture porosity is very small compared to matrix porosity. As a general rule it could be stated that fracture porosity is below 1% and in only very exceptional cases may reach a value of 1%. However, in very tight rocks having a primary porosity r •10% and a very extended network of macrofractures and microfractures, a fracture porosity between 0.5% and 2% may occur. As a consequence, for reservoirs with high matrix porosity, and thus very small fracture porosity, it is practically impossible by conventional logging tools to evaluate fracture porosity. Representative fracture porosity values can be obtained only from observations and direct measurements on cores (Ruhland, 1975). Fracture porosity from direct measurements: A direct measurement of fracture porosity requires" (1) fracture width [b] from cores; and (2) fracture density [LFD] from core examination, so that in idealized case (Fig. 7-27)"
713
/I/,
? Z
b
:
BL
r
A,.-
OL
. . . .
Fig. 7-27. Idealized matrix/fracture unit. Porosity = Void fracture surface / Total surface
d?/= n/ *b*Xb,/Xb, *Zbl = b*LFD = n/* b/Zb,
(7-14)
Fracture porosity from structural geological data (Murray, 1977): The presence of fractures in the case of a folded structure could be related to the bed thickness (h) and structural curvature expressed by [d2z/dx 2] for the cross-section shown in Fig. 7-28. Fracture porosity in this case is approximated by the equation:
C/= h [d2z / dx z]
(7-15)
Permeability In principle, the permeability established in the case of a conventional porous media remains valid in the case of a fractured reservoir. But in the presence of two systems (matrix and fractures), permeability has to be redefined in relation to matrix ("matrix" permeability), to fractures ("fracture" permeability) and to the fracture-matrix system ("fracture-matrix" permeability). This redefinition could create some confusion in relation to a fractured reservoir and fracture permeability, which could be referred to the "single fracture permeability" or to the "fracture network permeability" or to the entire "fracture-bulk volume permeability". The resulting expression of permeability is, therefore, examined in more detail. Fracture permeability. The matrix permeability remains the same as in a conventional reservoir, but the fracture permeability requires a review of its basic definition. (1) Single fracture case. The difference resulting from the flowing cross-section could be: The effective "real flow cross-section" ("S "~: of a single fracture based on Fig. x, ~ e f f e c t i v e 7.29 is represented by: S ffectiv e - -
a*b
(7-16)
714
,,-
X
Fig. 7-28. Cross-section of a reservoir.
and the "pseudo-cross flow section" based on the Darcy concept, which includes matrix and fractures, will result from Fig. 7-29 as:
SDarcy a*h =
=
A
(7-17)
Inasmuch as the flow along the length l, through parallel plates (very close to each other), could be extended to the flow in fractures, it may be written that:
q/= a*b (b 2/ 12 *u)*(Ap /A/)
(7.18)
whereas for the flow in a porous media based on Darcy law, the same rate is expressed as:
q:= a'h*. (k// #) * (Ap /Al)
(7-19)
From Equations 7-18 and 7-19 it follows that: b 3 / 12 = h'k/
(b / h ) *b 2 / 12 = k/
(7-20)
(7-20')
As may be observed the term (b 2 / 12) could be considered as a "pseudopermeability", which physically represents the "intrinsic permeability" (k::) of the fracture, while the term (b / h ) represents the fracture porosity (~:). In ttns case a number of basic correlations can be expressed as:
~:. k::
= k:
d~l = b / h 12 * k l / b 2 b = (12. k/* h) T M = (12" k//d?/) ~
(7-21)
715
l-
9 ..
9 .
~
9
.
.
9 .
.
I
9
9I ?"
. 9
. . . .
9
9
~.
.
.
".
.
.
.'"
.
'o
.
."
".
"
h FLOW ...9
..-.
'" 9 .
.
~ / 9
.
"'. 9 "'"
0
".
~._.,
. ..."
L=-
"
.
t
.
. '.
"" .
..'.""
.
DIRECTION
I "
".-"
""
" "
t
Fig. 7-29. Matrix block containing two fractures. Fracture 1 (or =0). Fracture 2 (or >0).
AL r
~
~
~
FLOW DIRECTION
,,
Fig. 7-30. Multi-fracture layer 9Fractures and layers are parallel.
(2) Multifracture case. If, instead of a single fracture, the flow is examined through a fracture system formed by several parallel fractures (n) as shown in Fig. 7-30, separated by matrix of height "e", then the flowing equation (similar to the case of single fracture) will give"
Q = n*ab*(b 2 / 12 ~) (A p / A / ) = ah* (k: / ~) (A p / A l)
(7-22')
or
nb*b2/12 = h ' k /
or
( n * b / h ) * (b2/12) = k/
(7-22")
n b / h = LFD *b = ~/ Thus:
k/r
b 2 / 12 = k// * ~/ = k// * b * LFD = (b 3 / 12)* LFD
~ / = 12 * k / / b 2 = (12 * k / * LFDO ~ b = [12 * k / / ~ : ]0.5 = [ 12 k / / L F D ]0.333
(7-22'")
716 For a random distribution of fractures, a correction factor for porosity could be written through (n/2) 2 as follows: ~ / = [12 * k / * (Jr / 2 ) 2* LFDZ] ~
= [29.6 * k / * LFDZ] ~
(7-23)
Fracture permeability measurements and evaluation. The fracture permeability can be measured as follows: (1) by special equipment (Kelton), where the core is oriented so that the flow takes place along the fracturing direction, between the two ends of fracture contained in the lateral cylindrical surface of the core; (2) by measuring the fracture opening, b, and counting the number n of the fractures for estimating of LFD; thus: k / = b 3 / 12 * LFD = (1 / 12) * (b 2 * ~/)
(7-24)
(3) if structural geologic data are available (Murray, 1977), then when reservoir fracturing occurs as a result of structural folding for a layer having a pay "h" (Fig. 729), the fracture permeability k/(in mD) can be estimated through the equation: k / = (0.2)
* 10 9 *
e 2 * [h * (dez /dx2)] 3
(7-25)
where the distance between the two fractures e is in cm. (4) from well testing in conditions of steady-state flow: k z = PI * {t.1~ * B o. [ln(r /rw) + S]} /[2 * zc * h]
(7-26)
because the flow toward the wellbore is taking place through the fracture network. The fracture porosity in the case of a random distribution of fractures becomes: ~: = [29.6 * k z where: PI is in fractional.
* LFDe] ~
=
STM3/D/atm,
0.00173 [PI p~176In re/rw LFD2]0.333 h ~t~
(7-27)
is in cP.; h is in m; and LFD is in 1/cm; and ~ / i s
Correlation between field data and idealized fracture~matrix system. Inasmuch as the permeability and porosity of a fracture network are physically different from those of an intergranular porous system, a special approach is proposed. The philosophy and the procedure are as follows: (1) During stabilized flow toward a well in a fractured reservoir, the productivity index is directly correlated to fracture permeability: k z = f (PI) ==>> k z calculated using Eq. 7-26. (2) If the observation of the cores has been carried out and processed, the estimation of fracture density LFD from core observations makes possible the evaluation of the fracture porosity as a function of productivity index:
717 TABLE 7-IV
Correlation of parameters for idealized matrix blocks (Reiss, 1966).
~ 0OEL
DINENSIONLESS
,io ~ L.F.D
~f
kfl~f a
13 a '
r 2
m
~
UJ
'
2b
T
i a2@ 3 12 !
"
]6
L,,
b2(~ I
1
2
~6 a (~f
3
I
X
b2
~f
"
2
2~ a
.
I
I
I
1
kfCQf,b)
kf (~f,a)
~/ ,,.
EQUATIONS
9 o
darcy
,
,,
b
dorcy ,,:
,,
,
6.33 a2q)f 3
8,~3~~o~,
1.04 a2q) f 3
z,,!6xi0-~-b2qbf
I/
(..);
<
LED
kf(~f,b)
u"l
-J
OlNENSIONAL
EQUATIONS
-6II'"
r
i ~ef3
1
2b
2.08a2~)f 3
8,33• 10""b2~ f
I
2b
1,0L a2(~f3
4,16•
2.0~m2(~ f3
8,33xlO'Lb2~ l
0.62 a2(~f3
5,55x 10' b2 .@i
~T I
I
i' !
2~
4
a
i 2~13
96
I
6 b2q)f
L 5
U3 LU
_.2
2,.b_ a
' -~, I'
1__a2(~f3' ~ b 2 & 48
2
1 2~3
~s~
f
UNITS" K [ D a r c y ) , o ( c m )
b(microns)
,~/=f(PI, LFD) = = = > > ~,/calculated through Eq. 7-27. (3) Assuming the six simplified and idealized models of matrix blocks as shown in Fig. 7-22, it is possible to correlate the basic data of idealized blocks as: a - block dimension; b - fracture width; k / - fracture permeability; ~)/- fracture porosity; and L F D - fracture density. The theoretical correlations are given in Table 7-IV for various idealized block shapes. The block dimensions (a) and fracture opening (b) can be estimated if permeability (k/) and porosity (~/) have been evaluated from well testing results.
Example 7-1 Evaluation of the matrix block from production data In a fractured reservoir, from production testing data a rate of 12,260 STB/D was measured, and the formation pressure drop was 68 psi. Other reservoir data are: oil viscosity Po = 1.1 cP; oil volume factor B ~ = 1.36; total reservoir pay h = 86 m;
718 drainage radius r = 1200 m; and well radius r = 10 cm. From core examination an average fracture density LFD was estimated to be 2/m. Question: Assuming the model 5 of Fig. 7-22 (cube with 2 flowing directions), evaluate: (1) the fracture permeability; (2) the fracture porosity; and (3) the block size (a) and the fracture opening (b) by using the field production data. Solution: Evaluation o f k t and d~tfrom field data. (1) The productivity index PI (STM3/D/atm) is given by e
w
PI = A Q / A p = 12660 (STB/D) / 68 (psi)= 186.17 (STB/D/psi)= 435 (STm3/D/atm) = 5034 (STcm 3 / D/atm) (2) The fracture permeability is equal to (Eq. 7-20):
k / = PI * B ~ * Po" (In r / rw) / 6.28 h = 5034 (STcm 3 / D/atm)* * 1.36 * 1.1 * In 12000 / 6.28 * 8600 = 1.31 D The porosity (Eq. 7-27) is: ~: = 1.73.10 -3 [PI. Po* Bo * In ( r / r ) * LFD2/h
]0.333
~I = 1.73.10 -3 [435 * 1.36 * 1.1 * In (12000) * 0.022 /
8 6 ] 0.3333 =
0.00025 = 0.025%
Evaluation of" block size a and fracture opening b. Based on Table 7-IV for cubeshaped matrix blocks (Model 5). (3) The cube dimension is equal to" a = [ k / / 2 . 0 8 * ~/3]0.5= [1.31/2.08*0.025 3]0.5 = 200 cm. = 2 m(4) The fracture width is equal to" b (~tm)= 100*a(cm) x ~(%)/2 = 100"200" 0.025/2 = 250 ~tm
Rock compressibility in fractured limestone reservoirs In a fractured reservoir, the compressibility of a system plays an important role, especially if there is a great contrast between the two porosities of matrix and fractures (~/<< Cm)"The role of compressibility is essential in the interpretation of the transient pressure behavior resulting from well testing. In this case, compressibility associated with the double-porosity system could express the storage capacity parameter which could be estimated through transient pressure behavior. The compressibility could be defined as the change in volume A F referred to the total volume F as a result of an applied pressure Ap:
719 (7-28)
C= (1/V) * (AV/Ap)
Depending on the reference volume used, the compressibility will represent a behavior of a certain volume subjected to compression, such as the bulk volume (VB), pore volume (Vp), or fracture volume (Vf). The change in volume due to the variation of effective net pressure p~ is the result of a change either in overburden stress o (while the pore pressure p remains constant), or a change in pore pressure p. (while the overburden pressure remains constant). The usual case during reservoir production history is given by the depletion, which is associated with the drop in pore pressure P during reservoir depletion: P p~ = o - - p p
(7-29)
and thus, an increase in p. The direct effect is a reduction in porosity related to the formation compressibility C" Cp = (1 / r * (de / dp~)
(7-30)
The compaction and the resulting reservoir subsidence are directly associated with the decrease of pore volume, due to continuous growth in Pe as a result of reservoir depletion. The effective compressibility of fractures can be written as: C = CI-C
(7-31)
where C I = fracture compressibility and C m -" matrix compressibility. In general, the fracture compressibility for a carbonate reservoir is higher than the matrix compressibility: C I - (10 to 100) C m
Effective compressibility in a fractured limestone reservoir In the case of a double-porosity reservoir, oil saturation S m = f (Sw~,m)in the matrix is related to the magnitude of interstitial water saturation, whereas in the fracture network S = 1, since the interstitial water saturation is zero. Thus" S
i,J
=1
wi,j" -- 0 Soi,m = 1 - S w i
m
Inasmuch as the fracture porosity is very small Ct << Cm' it may be approximated that the effective compressibility for matrix in the oil zone C o is: Ceo -- C O "~- C w * Swi m /(1 --Swim) "~" C
/ (1 --Swim)
(7-32)
720 where" C = 2 - 5 . 1 0 -4 (1/psi) and C = 3.10 .-6 (1/psi) and
C-- Cm-I- Cf~ C m In the case of double-porosity with an impervious matrix:
Sm--Si --1 Therefore, it follows that"
Co--C+ [C,(~m/l~s ] -I-[Cm. (~m/~S ] "~"Cf
(7-33)
where
Cm+ Cf = Cp In the double-porosity system the total storage capacity is associated with the compressibilities of the fractures and the matrix so that: ~,. C = ~l * C~ + ~/* C 2
(7-34)
where ~ and ~2 are expressed by ~, = ( 1 - ~ 2 )
(7-35')
* ~m" ( 1 - S w i )
~2 = if/
(7-35")
and respective compressibilities from Eq. 7-32 are C 1 = C + C * S i + [ C / (1 - S i ) C2 = C
]
(7-36) (7-37)
Relative permeability and capillary pressure curves in fractured carbonate reservoirs Relative permeability Relative permeabilities in a conventional reservoir are obtained from special core analysis. In a fractured reservoir, the evaluation of relative permeability curves is complicated because of the nature of double-porosity system, where the fracturing plane between two matrix units develops a discontinuity in the multi-phase flowing process. At the present time, it may be stated that due to difficulties involved in the
721 attempt to present a "unique relative permeability curve" for the entire fracture/matrix system, it is more recommendable to characterize the fractured reservoir by two relative permeability curves: one for the matrix and another for the fracture network. Matrix Relperm curves. The relative permeability of the matrix for two or three phases is evaluated by the procedure used for any intergranular rock sample. The results have to be representative in relation to the shape of Relperm curves and the magnitude of their endpoints (irreducible saturation in the wetting and non-wetting phases and the respective relative permeability values at these critical saturations). Fracture Relperm curves. The fracture network Relperm curves are basically different from matrix Relperm curves as a consequence of the very high intrinsic permeability of fractures. This very high permeability will have as a main consequence the predominant control of gravity forces in multiphase flow in fractures. As a result of gravity equilibrium, the relative permeability curves will essentially be reduced to two straight lines (diagonals) as shown in Fig. 7-31A. At certain conditions, especially when drops of oil are moving in the fracture saturated with water, it is more correct to adjust the wetting phase Relperm curve (Fig. 7-31B) by a different relationship:
ketting = [Sett ]n
(7-38)
where often n = 3 and dimensionless saturation, Sett, is equal to:
Swett = (Swett- Swett,i ) / (l -
Swi)
(7-39)
Capillary pressure curve In a fractured matrix system, the capillary pressure curve plays a much more important role than in a conventional reservoir. In fact, in a single-porosity reservoir the role of capillary pressure at static conditions is associated with the transition zone, whereas at dynamic conditions the capillary forces (and thus the capillary pressure curve shape and magnitude) play a more limited role because the fluid displacement process in all conventional reservoirs is mainly controlled by viscous forces. On the contrary, in a fractured reservoir where the displacement process is essentially controlled by gravity and capillary pressure forces, the examination of capillary pressure curve behavior becomes essential for a correct understanding of the displacement process. Capillary pressure behavior with both "drainage" and "imbibition" displacement processes, if combined with gravity displacement behavior (through similar relationship), make possible evaluation of matrix-fractures fluid exchange. Wettability role. Wettability is the result of interaction of the solid / fluid under given temperature and pressure conditions where one fluid which is preferentially wetting the solid represents the "wetting phase" and the other fluid wetting the solidless is called the "non-wetting-phase". There are a series of conditions which contribute to increasing or decreasing preferential wettability of one or the other of the phases:
722 A
Knw Kwy
1
I
K
Knv,/
l
, T
0
0
Sw
"~
o 0
Sw ~ ' ~ "
"1
Fig. 7-31. Relative permeabilities in fractures: a =vertical equilibrium; b = optimized curves.
(1) higher temperature increases the wettability for water phase; and (2) certain compounds, such as asphaltene, reduce the wettability for water and increase the wettability for oil. The various phases encountered in a hydrocarbon reservoir under preferential wettability for one phase compared with other are: Wetting
Wetting phase
Non-wetting phase
Number of phases
Water-wet case Water-wet case Water-wet case Oil-wet case Oil-wet case
Water Water Water Oil Oil
Oil and gas Oil Gas Water and gas Gas
three two two three two
Capillary displacement vs. wettability. The displacement of oil from the matrix, and the role of capillary pressure, are dependent on fluid saturations in the fracture/matrix system, as well as on fluid wettability and saturation history. In fact, the displacement process could be a drainage or an imbibition process if the behavior of saturation variation in the matrix and fractures is similar to those described in Table 7-V Initially (@ t = 0) the matrix blocks are fully saturated with the "wetting-phase" ( S e t t "- 1) and the surrounding fractures fully saturated with "non-wetting-phase " ( S e t t = 0). The displacement of "wetting-phase" (contained in matrix blocks) by "nonwetting-phase" (contained in fractures) requires a higher pressure in fractures than in matrix (Pl > Pmatrix) and is called "drainage displacement". The resulting capillary pressure vs. saturation relationship is known as the "drainage capillary pressure curve" (Fig. 7-29). Inversely, if initially (@ t = 0) the matrix block is saturated with a "nonwetting-phase" ( S e t t = 0 ) , whereas the fractures are saturated with the "wetting-phase"
723 TABLE 7-V Initial conditions of drainage / imbibition displacement.
. . . . .
TIME
I
ii
' FRACTURE
/i i
ii
i
i
ii
i
ii
!
i
SWETT : 0
att=O
i DISPLACEMENT PROCESS
MATRIX
SWETT : I 1.
,
Pfr
>
,
P Matrix
DRAINAGE t >0
S WETT = 0
S WETT < 1 (decreases)
SWETT : I
SWETT = 0
att=O Pfr
= ,,
t >0
S WETT < 1
P Matrix
IMBIBITION
:,,
SWETT > 0 (increases) ill
i
1), then an "imbibition displacement" drive mechanism takes place (see Fig. 7-32). This displacement is controlled by a capillary pressure vs. saturation relationship known as "imbibition capillary pressure" curve.
(Set t =
Description of drainage and imbibition displacementprocess. In order to describe the drainage and imbibition processes, the desaturation in a wetting-phase (drainage), and saturation increases in a wetting-phase (imbibition) are schematically illustrated between initial conditions (@ t= 0) and final conditions (t ~ oo) in Fig. 7-33. If a "non-wetting phase" initially saturating the matrix block is displaced by a "wetting phase", then the result will be an "imbibition capillary pressure vs. saturation curve". If this "wetting-phase" in the block is further displaced by a "non-wetting phase", a "drainage process" will take place. This displacement is controlled by the "drainage capillary pressure vs. saturation curve" (Fig. 7-33) The essential characteristics obtained from the two driving histories, which resuited in two capillary pressure curves (drainage and imbibition) indicated in Fig. 733, suggest the following: (1) the minimum saturation of a wetting phase, which is the same in both processes and is called "irreducible saturation of wetting phase," corresponds to an infinitely large "displacing capillary pressure"; (2) the shape of a drainage capillary pressure curve shows the distribution of pores and reflects the homogeneity of pore dimensions; (3) the existence of a residual saturation in the non-wetting phase is obtainable only in an imbibition displacement process, when the trapped non-wetting phase fills
724
aP Or)
r
C.D
100% w e t t i n g - phase s a t u r a t i o n
Fig. 7-32. Drainage and imbibition capillary pressure curves. large-diameter pores which intersect with clusters of small-diameter pores; (4) in the case of capillary and gravity forces controlling a drainage process, the displacement of a wetting phase by a non-wetting phase can take place only if the threshold height is smaller than the block height; (5) the drainage process can start only if the pressure difference p /.,.,.t ~o~ - p ..... is .... t.i,. higher than "threshold pressure" Pthreshold (which is very close to the pore throat pressure); and (6) capillary forces are opposing the entrance of a non-wetting-phase in the matrix during the drainage process, whereas capillary forces help the entrance of the wetting phase in the matrix during imbibition.
Dimensionless drainage capillary pressure curve. A dimensionless curve can be elaborated by using a "normalization" approach for cores of the same reservoir but of different physical properties (porosity, permeability, etc.) and for which the capillary-saturation relationship was evaluated under different laboratory conditions (pressure, temperature, fluid characteristics, etc.). The dimensionless function J (Sw) expresses the ratio between capillary pressure and a pressure term expressed by parameter group formed by k, ~, o, and O: J (Sw) = Pc / o * cosO * (~) / k) '/2
(7-40)
where J (Sw) represents the Leverett dimensionless capillary pressure; ~ and k are
725
Pfr = Pmatrix
F I
MAT;IX SWETT = o
IMBIBITION MATRIX SATURATION HISTORY
J
+
~
FRACTURE l SWETT = 1 J
INIT1AL SWETT = 0
IMBIBITION PROCESS
DURING DISPL ACEMENT 0 < SWETT< MAX
FINA L SWETT = MAXIMUM
0 SWETT 1
0 SWETT I
pc !
CAPILLARY FORCES DIRECTED TOWARD MATRIX
o SWETT 1
CAPILLARY FORCES HELP DISPLACEMENT
-)
1
CAPILLARY FORCES DIRECTED TOWARD FRACTURES _1
1'
t
SWETT = 1
i SWETT o FRACTURE i
[ MATRIXA
t I I
CAPILLARY FORCES OPPOSE DISPLACEMENT
,I,
Pc 0 SWETT t
0 SWEIT
0 SWETT_1
, .
=
L
MATRIX [ WETTING PHASE SATURATION[ SWETT
SWETT = 0
'DRAINAGE PROCESS
t
INITIAL
0 < SWETT< MINIMUM SWETT= MINIMUM DURING DISPLACEMENT
FINAL
f Prr > Pmatrix
]
DRAINAGE MATRIX SATURATION HISTORY
Fig. 7-33. Imbibition/drainagecapillary displacementprocess. core porosity and permeability, respectively; and c and 0 are the interfacial tension and contact angle, respectively.
Schematization of drive mechanism by capillary and gravity forces. In a fractured reservoir, the imbibition will take place whenever the wetting phase (water) in fractures displaces the matrix block non-wetting phase (oil). A simplified scheme of the displacement process controlled by gravity and/or capillary forces is shown in Fig. 734, where the oil displacement is due to: (1) only capillary forces which imbibe the matrix with water (case a), and (2) additional gravity effects (case b) as a result of level difference h between water-oil contacts in fractures and matrix. By examining the two matrix blocks saturated with oil in Fig. 7-34, if the water-oil contact is at the matrix bottom face (Fig. 7-34A), then the forces displacing the oil are only the capillary forces. But if the water-oil contact in fractures is above the matrix block bottom face (Fig. 7-34B), the difference in the specific weight of water-oil generates a gravitational force G = (h.AT), which acts as a displacement gravitational driving force in addition to driving capillary forces. The magnitude of gravitational forces depends on the magnitude of level difference h between water-oil contacts in fractures and matrix: G = h * Ay
(7-41)
726 whereas the capillary forces are proportional to the average capillary height h c" P = h * A),
(7-42)
Composite capillary pressure curve. The capillary forces vs. water saturation curve ( P - S ) displays the distribution and magnitude of capillary forces during the displacement process of oil by water. If an analysis of gravity forces displacement is carried out, a similar curve (PG vs. Sw) could represent the relationship between gravity forces and oil desaturation (oil recovery). The "gravity forces" during the displacement are acting more in medium to large pores, whereas "capillary forces" displace the non-wetting phase more from medium to small pores. But the capacity of gravity to displace the non-wetting phase (oil) depends on the diameter of pore interconnections. In fact, a part of the displaced fluid might be trapped as a result of connection of medium to large pores with small pores leading to the blockage of oil in the large pores as result of contrasting pore size. As a result, the relation PG vs. S wwill reflect its dependence on two key elements" pore size distribution and pore intercommunication. The experimental PG vs. S wcurve may be considered similar to a capillary pressure curve, and it is therefore acceptable to consider gravity force Pc to be equivalent to a negative capillary pressure P (the negative sign of P is a conventional sign):
(7-43)
PG = - Pc
OIL IN
FRACTURES
"'"
""
9
.
9
"
9
" W A T E R ' ' -
.,,.,
A
B
Fig. 7-34.Typeof displacementfor matrixblock: (A) displacementundercapillaryforces; (B) displacement under capillary and gravity forces.
727
capillary
Pc
0
100"/,
gravity
1
forces
/
Fig. 7-35. Composite capillary pressure curve including the role of gravity vs. desaturation in water,
A S w.
During the imbibition process if the necessary conditions occur, then both gravity and capillary forces may displace the fluid saturating the matrix. Thus the gravity and capillary imbibition roles may be represented by a "composite curve" as shown in Fig. 7-35.
FRACTURED CARBONATE RESERVOIR EVALUATION THROUGH WELL PRODUCTION DATA
A fractured carbonate reservoir may have only one porosity type (only fractures) wherein the blocks delimited by fractures are impervious (Fig. 7-36A) or may have dual-porosity system when both the fractures and the matrix are porous and permeable (Fig. 7-36B). In the single-porosity case where the continuum is formed only by the fracture network, the solid impervious blocks play a similar role as the solid grains of a conventional intergranular reservoir, whereas the fracture network is similar to the intergranular voids. Based on this analogy, some basic laws and flowing equations established for flow in conventional intergranular limestone can be extended to the case of flow in a fracture network. The "continuum" formed by the totality of intercommunicating fractures is, in principle, described by fracture permeability and fracture density which could be evaluated from well test analysis.
728 In a case of double porosity formed by fractures and matrix, a different approach is introduced where only the fracture network represents a continuum, whereas all single isolated matrix blocks represent the discontinuity. Inasmuch as these single matrix blocks are characterized by large porosity and small but sufficient permeability, to assure the exchange of fluid with the fractures they could be considered as sources of fluids. These sources, containing large volumes of fluid when compared with the volume contained in the adjacent fractures, can feed the fractures with fluid during well production, or can receive fluid for storage during pressure build-up or during fluid storage. With this role played by matrix blocks, it becomes clear that their role is equivalent to "fluid supply sources" or "fluid storage sources", whereas the role of fracture networks is to "carry the fluid" from these sources toward the well during production and, inversely, toward the sources (matrix blocks) during storage.
Single porosity case (impervious matrix) In the case of impervious matrix blocks, the flow through high to very high-permeability fractures will be stabilized in a relatively short time either after initiation of production or after well production is shut in. As in the flow in pipes or in an intergranular porous reservoir, it was shown that the flow in a fractured reservoir presents a laminar state at low flow rates and a turbulent state at high flowing rates. In the flow of a fluid through a pipe of small diameter, through intergranular pores, or through a fracture network, viscous forces play a predominant role. Between the fracture networks with their very small openings (baverag e -" 30 microns) and intergranular pores it is possible to present a general physical analogy between the flow in fractures and flow in porous media.
Flow through single fractures In the narrow space of a single fracture (Fig. 7-29), the steady-state flow rate can be expressed by Eqs. 7-18 and 7-19, in the following forms: q/= q = a*b*(b 2 / 12" ~t) * (dp/d/) = a * b * (k/i~ ~t) * (dp / dO
(7-44')
where b z/12 = k//
(7-44")
and k is considered "intrinsic" fracture permeability. If ~n / the single fracture case (Fig. 7-29), the flow is expressed by Darcy's law, then overall cross-flow area a h has to be introduced with the fracture permeability (k/):
Q
=
a ' h * (k/I Ix) * (dp / dO
(7-45)
Combining Eqs. 7-44 and 7-45, a number of correlations as shown in Eq. 7-21 is obtained.
Flow through multi-fractures In fracture systems having an idealized geometries, the flow rate Q (Fig. 7-30) will
729
A
Fig. 7-36. Fracture-matrix system: (A) impervious matrix (k = 0) and (B) porous matrix (k = 0). have to include the effective cross-flow area (n.a.b):
Q = n*a*b*(b 2/12~)
*
(@/dO = n*a*b*k H (1/~)
*
(@/dO
(7-46)
or if based on Darcy's law, the fracture permeability (kj) and the total flowing crosssection (a.h) are introduced in the rate expression:
Q
=
a*h (ks/It) * (dp /
dO
(7.47)
On the other hand, the fracture network can be idealized through simple geometrical
730
Y
THE VELOCITY PROFILE
__7~ 8 4
! I ! I I I
It
/
/ Fig. 7-37. Schematic presentation of flow through two walls delimiting a fracture.
models as elaborated in Fig. 7-22 and in Tables 7-IV, 7-VI and 7-VII. The results obtained from field data could be reviewed in the light of this relationship, as shown in the Example 7-1.
Transition from laminar to turbulent flow in fractures From the experience of flow in pipes it is known that turbulent flow depends on pipe roughness, the magnitude of which is directly related to the friction factor. The transition from the laminar state to turbulent state of flow is controlled by the Reynolds number which is the ratio of the inertia to viscous forces: Re=2V*D* p/p=2VD/v
(7-48)
where V is the average velocity in the pipe, D is the length of the pipe, P and p are, respectively, the density and viscosity of the fluid transported, and v is the kinematic viscosity. For flow between parallel walls delimiting a fracture (Snow, 1965), the Reynolds number is given by:
Re=2*p*V*b/p=2* V*b/v
(7-49)
731
TABLE 7-VI Idealized geometrical models o f fractured reservoirs i,
i
i
Vx - 0
Vy= O;Vz - 0
HODEL 1 9
HODEL 2
9
9
SLIDES
HODEL 3 s
9
HATCHES
Vz= 0; Vy-O
9
Vx- O. Vy-O
s
HATCHES
Vx = O;Vy=O
MODEL z, IZUBES
MODEL 5 IZUBES
s
9
9
Velocity
L.F.D.
Cf
Vx= 0
1/a
Vy = 0; V z = 0
1/a
3. Matches
V x - 0; Vy - 0
4. Cubes
Vy- 0
MODEL 6 IZUBES
9
9
r
a
b
b/a
12*Kf*LFD 2
1/LFD
(12*Kf/dpf) ~
2b/a
96*Kf*LFD 2
1/LFD
(24*Kf/~r) ~
2/a
2b/a
12*Kf*LFD 2
2/LFD
(12*Kf/~f)~
V z - 0; Vy - 0
1/a
2b/a
96*Kf*LFD 2
2/LFD
(12*Kfh~f)~
5. Cubes
V x - Vy - 0
2/a
2b/a
12*Kf*LFD 2
1/LFD
(12*Kf/,f) ~
6. Cubes
Vy = 0
2/a
3b/a
40.5*Kf*LFD 2
2/LFD
(18*K/,# o.'
Model TYPE 1. Slides 2.
Matches
732 "Relative roughness" values for an average fracture opening of 20 gm are around 0.0015 - 0.025 for limestones and 0.004 - 0.007 for dolomites. In the event the fracture network is treated similar to a porous medium, it is necessary to introduce permeability and, thus, the critical Reynolds number is: Recr =
1
where the Reynolds number is expressed by a semi-empiric equation:
Re=lO*9* V*k ~
(7-50)
Basic equations describing flow in fractures If the flowing process in a fractured limestone network is considered analogous to the flow in an intergranular limestone, then the relationship between pressure drop Ap and rate Q will be:
Ap=A * Q+Bv* Q2 This corresponds to a linear flow for low rates when B T. Q 2 << A. Q, and to turbulent flow for high rates when B T . Q 2 > A.Q. Both constants A and BT in these cases depend on flow geometry and physical properties of rock and fluids. Thus, the analogy between a conventional reservoir and a fracture network is based on the similarity between the parameters of the fracture system (kp krp qbp b, n, LED) and the parameters of a conventional reservoir (k, ~, h). Such relati6nsliips for various simplified geometries of fracture networks are given in Tables 7-IV, 7-VI and 7-VII.
TABLE 7-VII Evaluation of permeability kj and rate Q for idealized geometrical models of fractured reservoirs. |
i
L
|
Rate
MODELS* ~f?12 LFD 2
Q = (A* ~)f 3 / 12 LFD 2) ( @ / d O
~f~96 LFD 2
Q = (A* ~)f 3 / 96 LFD 2) (dp/dl)
~r-~48 LFD 2
Q = (A* , f 3 / 48 LFD 2) (dp/dl)
~f~96 LFD 2
Q = (A* , f 3 / 96 LFD 2 ) ( d p / d / )
~f~162 LFD 2
Q = (A* ~)f 3 / 162 LFD 2) (dp/dl)
* Similar to the models of Table 7-VI
733
Steady-state radial symmetrical flow (toward a well) General analogy criteria. In a fractured network, as in a conventional intergranular reservoir, as soon as the well starts to produce the pressure will drop in the producing well and the fluid will move toward the well along the radial symmetrical flow lines. In three dimensions, the flow takes place through cross-sections represented by lateral surfaces of cylinders (which are co-axial with cylinder-shaped wellbore, see Fig. 7-38). Due to the same analogy between the flow through interconnected channel systems (fracture network) and the flow through intergranular pores (porous media), it is physically correct to express the flowing equation as Ap = A Q at low flowing rates. A non-linear relationship Q2 vs. Ap exists when flow rates are high, so that the total pressure drop becomes:
(7-51)
Ap =A * Q + B T* Q2
which is presented in a diagram Q vs. Ap (Fig. 7-39). As may be observed, the laminar flow Ap = A * Q is valid until a critical rate Qer is reached. If the rates continue to increase beyond a certain transition zone, the second right-hand term of Eq. 7-51 becomes predominant, and the flow is almost completely controlled by a turbulent flow state, expressed by Ap = B * QZ.
Radial flow analogy. In case of a radial symmetrical flow and based on the analogy discussed (Snow, 1965), the constants A and B are equal to:
WELL
MATRIX km,O
FRACTURE Fig. 7-38. Flow toward a well through fracture network.
734
AP=
f
ill
Fig. 7-39. Relationship between Q and AP obtained in a radial flow toward a well, through a fracture network. A = [~o* Bo (ln r / r + S)] / 2 * rt * k: * h
(7-52)
Bx=I3 * kto* B o ( 1 / r w - 1 / r ) / 4 *
(7-53)
r~' * h 2
where 13 is expressed as a function of permeability and porosity: 13 (1 / ft) = 2.23.109 / [k/. dp/(mD.fraction)] 1~
(7-54)
The use of the above equations can help two objectives: (1) to express the flowing equation:
Ap =A * Q + Bv * Q2 This is possible if the physical parameters (d~: k/, ~t, h, Bo) and geometrical data (rw, re) are available, in order to estimate the parameters A and B T through Eqs. 7-52 and 7-53. (2) To estimate the reservoir characteristics:
k/, dp/, [3, a and b. This is possible if the production data (Q and p) recorded during well testing are available.
735
t AP/Q A
Q Fig. 7-40. Relationship between AP and Q for the evaluation of parameters A and Br. Procedure f o r f i e l d parameters evaluation. By using the well stabilized rate [Q] and
pressure difference [Ap] during the steady-state conditions of flow, a linear relationship Ap / Q vs. Q is obtained when data are plotted as in Fig. 7-40. From the straight-line relationship Ap / Q vs. Q, the parameters A and B are directly obtained: A = as the value Ap / Q @ Q = 0 and B T = as the slope of straight-line Ap / Q vs. Q. The constantsA andB can be further used for evaluation of reservoir characteristics. Permeability. Permeability ks from Eq. 7-26 and using parameter A equal to 1 / PI,
gives: ks = {~o * Bo * [ln ( r / r ) + S]} / 6.28 * h * A
(7-55)
Porosity ~s can be estimated only if the fracture density LFD is known from core observations. Equation 7-27 requires the knowledge of productivity index (P/) and of fracture density LFD: ~I = 1.73.10 -3 {PI*B ~ * kt~ [In (r e /rw) + S)] * LFD2 / h] u3
(7-56)
where productivity index (PI) and parameter A are related by the expression PI = 1 / A. Turbulence. Turbulence factor 13, could be obtained from Eq. 7-53 by using the parameter BT:
736
= 4 * rc2 h 2 . r * B x~ 9o* Bo
(7-57)
Permeability. Permeability k: can be obtained from the turbulence factor fl by using Eq. 7-54:
k/(mD) = (1 / r
* [(2.2.10 9) / ]~ (1 / ft)] 0"922
(7-54')
Idealized model characterization. Based on parameters as k/, d?/and LFD for a given idealized block shape, the block size a and fracture opening b can be obtained from Table 7-VI:
a = f (LFD) b = f(k, r
Example 7-2 Fractured reservoir characterization from well testing data In a fractured limestone reservoir, from well production testing the following rates and pressure drop data rates were obtained: TEST 1
==>
Q = 5600 STB/D
Ap = 127.7 psi
TEST 2
==>
Q = 11300 STB/D Ap = 318.5 psi
TEST 3
==>
Q = 16700 STB/D Ap = 556.0 psi
In addition, the following data are known: Oil viscosity Oil gravity Oil volume factor Fracture density Average pay Drainage radius Well radius
kt~ )'o B~
= = = LFD = h = re = rw =
0.4 cP 0.814.10 -3 kg/cm 3 1.41 2/m 96 m 350 m 10 cm
Determine: (1) flowing parameters A and B x by plotting Ap / Q vs. Q obtained by the well testing; (2) the flowing equation Ap vs Q; (3) the limestone fracture permeability, k:; (4) the limestone fracture porosity, if/.; (5) the turbulence factor, 13; (6) a simplified / idealized matrix block, assuming a cubic matrix block where the
737
0.03 9-0.0175 1::13 I.--O0
0.02 -
/
= 9 . 4 x 1 0 -7 ( p s i / S T B / D ) 2 )
rd3 Q. v
0 13..
<~
A= 1.75x 10-2 [(psi/STB/D)] 0.01 '-J
i
I
I
I
I
5,000
10,000
I
I
I
15,000
Q(STB/D) Fig. 7-41. Relationship between AP / Q and Q obtained from well testing data in a fractured reservoir.
flow takes place in all three cartesian directions (model 6 of Fig. 7-22).
Solution (1) Based on well testing data: Q STB/D Ap psi Ap / Q psi/STB/D
5600 127.7 0.0228
11,300 318.5 0.02818
16,700 556 0.0332
These data are plotted in Fig. 7-41 as a straight-line (Ap / Q vs. Q), from which constants A and B v can be obtained: IfQ=0 A = 1.75" 10-2 psi/STBD = 6.49.10 -4 atm / STcm 3/ sec = 7.51.10 -3 a t m / S T m 3 / D The slope B T = [(Ap / Q)] / AQ = 9.4.10 -7 psi / STBD 2 = 2* 10-8 a t m / ( S T c m 3 / sec) 2 (2) The flowing equation is: AP (psi) = 1.75.10 -2 * Q (STBD) + 9.4.10-7Q z (STBD) 2
738 (3) The permeability k z is determined from linear relationship Ap vs. Q (Eq. 7-55) k / = [~to* Bo* In ( r / r ) ] / 6.28 * h * A =
0.4 * 1.41 * In (3500) / 6.28 * 96.102 * 6 . 4 9 . 1 0 -4 = 0.117 D = 117 mD where: h (cm); ~t~ (cP); A ( a t m / S T c m 3/sec). (4) Fracture porosity ~/is obtained from Eq. 7-56, assuming a random distribution of the fractures" ~: = 1.73.10 -3 [PI * B ~ * ~t~ * In (r e / r ) * LDF2/ h] ~/3 where" P I = 1/A (STm 3/ D / atm); ~/fraction; ~t o is in cP; h is in m and L F D is in 1 / cm. ~: = 1.73. 10 -3 * [(1 / 7.51. 10-3) * 1.41 * 0.4 * In (3500) * 0.022 / 96] v3 ~ / = 0.00023 = 0.023 % (5) The turbulence factor can be obtained from Eq. 7-57"" 13 = B T [4 rc 2 h 2 rw/9oBo ] = 2* 10-8 . *[4 * (3.14 * 9600) 2 10 / 0.83.10 -6 * 1.4] = 0.625*
10 9
(1/cm) = 19"
10 9 (l/ft)
where" h is in cm; r is in cm; 90 (kg * sec 2/cm4); B T is in atm / (cm 3 / sec)2. (6) Evaluation of the idealized matrix block Using the matrix block having a cube shape and where the flow takes place in all three flowing directions, from Table 7-IV one obtains the matrix block size: a = [ k / / 0 . 6 2 * ff/3]0.5 = [0.117(D) / 0.62 * 0.018 3]o.5= 179 cm = 1.79 m The fracture opening b = [100 if//3a(cm)] = [100 * 0.018 / 3 * 179] o.5 = 0.0033 cm = 33 ~tm C o n i n g in f r a c t u r e d reservoirs
The general considerations concerning the formation and development of coning in a conventional porous reservoir will not change in the case of a fractured reservoir, but the flowing conditions must be reviewed with regard to the specific conditions which govern flow in fractures. The basic equations are almost the same and can be extended to fractured reservoirs, so long as the continuity of the fracture network is developed throughout the oil and water zones, or oil and gas-cap zones. The fractured reservoir, producing either through an open-hole well or through a cased and perforated well, will have a certain producing pay delimited by two, upper and lower, boundaries (Fig. 7-42):
739 _~.--~,";-o:e~.o::::~:.C~4 9 '!r162 " ~ ' ~ " ~"~.:~:.~, - .... :o-~""-~176 .~.,-.~-'.. ..... * ~ O "" ":
:0. "".'0
!~ih:~gl ~'!~"':C:::2.=.0 ~ - . ~ : :
..........
:"
I~.'..:~:--<: o-:.-:~: ~-.:,,.~:. ,:~:~.:o:-.~ .:-o:0,. '.~",,. ~ . " o i~,:~,..... - ..
E.s:
"2'//
GOL
LFEy/:
/
WOL
Fig. 7-42. Sketch o f water-oil and gas-oil contacts vs. LFEP and HFEP.
HFEP: the highest fluid entry point, and LFEP: the lowest fluid entry point The evaluation of HFEP and LFEP and respective gas-oil and water-oil contacts in the fracture network (GOL and WOL) will indicate the "non-completed" height (hg and h w, Fig. 7-42) equivalent to the gas-coning and water-coning heights, respectively. The coning is thus associated with a certain critical radius r cr' which will correspond to the limit over which the water will arrive toward the well. Inasmuch as during production of oil through a fractured reservoir the flow toward the well is radial-symmetrical, the pressure distribution will follow a logarithmic variation along the flowing streamline. Around the wellbore, a critical zone of radius rcr is associated with the possibility of coning as an effect of high pressure gradient (as shown in Fig. 7-43). As a consequence, for both contacts (gas-oil and water-oil) the coning criteria values will always be represented by a critical and a safe coning value. Critical coning is obtained in relation to the laminar flow (BT = 0) and thus is expressed by:
hcr =
mPlaminar/m'y * In (r e / rw) = A * Q / Ay * 6.9
(7-58)
where it is assumed that ( r / rw) = 1000. Safe coning height in both flowing states, i.e., laminar and turbulent, is equal to hSAFE -- mPtotal 6.9 * A7 = (A * Q +B T * Q 2) / 6.9 * Ay
(7-59)
As a general rule, the coning criteria have to be associated with the reservoir pay thickness. For pay 200 ft < h < 1000 ft Eq. 7-58 is used for coning evaluation. For pay h < 200 ft, Eq. 7-59 is used for coning evaluation.
740
ii
\
~--~ W~QZ~L ~WOLI
---:c l rc
Fig. 7-43. Water coning, function of movable water-oil contact position.
The explicit coning evaluations for gas-oil and water-oil are" Water-oil coning hwo _ Water-oil coning hwo Gas-oil coning hg ~ _
_
c r ----
S A F E
cr =
Gas-oil coning hg~ - S A F E
A *Q/6.9 * A?w~ --"
[A *Q+B T * Q'] / 6.9 * A?w~
A * Q / 6.9 * Aqtg~ "-
[A
*
Q + B T * Q'] / 6.9 * A?g~
(7-60a) (7-60b) (7-60c) (7-60d)
FRACTURED LIMESTONE RESERVOIR EVALUATION THROUGH TRANSIENT FLOW
WELL DATA
The conventional reservoir having intergranular porosity is studied under the simplified assumption that it is homogeneous, and the physical properties such as
741 porosity and permeability are showing overall certain trends in the field. In a naturally-fractured reservoir, as a result of fracturing processes there are a series of discontinuities throughout the reservoir, a situation that results in two distinct porosities (matrix porosity and fracture porosity) and sometimes a third one, vuggy porosity (as shown in Fig. 7-44). The matrix region with fine pores and high storage capacity, but a low flowing conductivity, is connected with the fractured network region which has a low storage capacity but a high to very high flowing conductivity. Such contrasting conditions require different reservoir engineering procedures from those used in conventional intergranular reservoirs. The proposed procedures have as objectives the interpretation of transient recorded well pressure data vs. time in order to estimate reservoir characteristics such as porosity and permeability of both fracture and matrix regions, fracture density, matrix block shapes and sizes, etc. From all procedures discussed in the literature (Aronofsky and Natanson, 1958; Pollard, 1959; Barenblatt et al., 1960; Warren and Root, 1963), the most representative by its correct physical approach and proposed solution remains the Warren-Root (1963) method.
VUGS
MATRIX
FRAC TURE
Fig. 7-44. Real fractured reservoir rock.
Basic discussion of Warren-Root method The Warren-Root (1963) method proposes and uses a simplified representation of a fractured reservoir by an idealized system, where single matrix blocks are identical rectangular parallelipipeds separated by an orthogonal network of fractures (Fig. 745). The flow toward the wellbore is considered to take place only in the fractured network, whereas the expanded fluid contained in the single matrix block, as a result of fracture network pressure depletion, will feed the fractures network as shown in Fig. 7-46. The method can be summarized as follows:
742 ~ m N
~
~-_'_
\
\ MATRIX
'/-
FRACTURES
Fig. 7-45. Idealized fractured reservoir.
eee@@DDDe@eD @~N@@eeN~~Ge q~~D~
~Des
E] E] Q D D
~G 89
,/
Fig. 7-46. Matrix-fractures fluid exchange during the flow toward a well.
743 Log t..~ ,,
~f~
"-4
'Qt
~.P
., ....... %
,I,
,
I I
FIRST STAGE
FIRST STAGE
! SECOND STAGE
i
?
i
SECOND STAGE
m,',
I THIRDSTAGE
!
A
THIRD STAGE
,
i ~.."
! I
I .,. I.."
&P
.."" / /
/
Z V
Log [At/(to+~t)] ~
-
B
Fig. 7-47. Double slope of transient pressure in a well during pressure drawdown and pressure build-up. (1) The procedure of reservoir evaluation proposed by Warren-Root (1963) is based on a similar processing approach as is used in a conventional reservoir: the well data are plotted as pressure variation vs. log time either for pressure drawdown (Fig. 747A) or for pressure build-up (Fig. 7-47B). (2) In all transient behavior analyses of a "one-porosity reservoir" (non-fractured limestone), the well pressure vs. log time is represented axiomatically by a straightline in both conditions: pressure drawdown or pressure build-up. (3) In the case of a "double porosity" (fractured) reservoir, the pressure plotted vs. log time will exhibit in both cases of pressure drawdown and buildup: a double straight-line (double-slope) over three stages of different behavior (Fig. 7-47).
744 (4) The three stages in the variation of pressure with log time are represented by: (1) in a first one a straight line called early stage; (2) a second one called transition or intermediate stage; and (3) a third one, again a straight-line, called final stage. Each of them reflects the fluid exchange between the matrix and fracture network whenever a well starts to produce at a constant rate (Fig. 7-47A) or production stops, and the pressure starts to build up (Fig. 7-47).
Basic physics of transient flow analysis A pressure vs. log time diagram reveals the presence of two parallel straight lines instead of only one (as is usually obtained in a non-fractured reservoir). This will be the first step in recognizing the existence of a fractured reservoir. The specificity of the pressure vs. log time behavior in the case of a fractured reservoir requires a physical analysis of flowing conditions. For this analysis, the case of well pressure drawdown under a constant production rate is presented here: (1) After starting to produce a well at a constant rate Q, the well pressure decreases because the fracture pore volume is small and the supply of liquid from the matrix has not yet started. The linear pressure decline vs. log time reflects the flowing capacity of the fracture network as shown in Fig. 7-48 along the straight-line between points 1 and 2. This phase is called the "early stage" of transient pressure behavior. (2) By continuing to produce fluid at a constant rate from the fracture network (Fig. 7-46) the pressure in the fractures p ! declines continuously, developing a pressure difference between the matrix and fracture (p m - p f ") Thus the fluid from matrix blocks will start to flow toward the fracture network. By feeding the fracture network with expanded fluid from matrix, the result is similar to an "injection of liquid" in Log t ..~
0
, l\ ' T vX\
AP x
\\\\
1,
FIRSTSTAGE
I SECONDSTAGE l THIRDSTAGE
Fig. 7-48. Pressure drawdown behaviour (Dp vs. log time) in a producing well.
745 fractures, and consequently, the well pressure decline is reduced. This second phase (representing the "transition stage ") is shown in Fig. 7-48 where: (i) the decline reduction corresponds to the time when the "feeding rate" arriving from matrix blocks starts to compensate a part of fracture "production rate" at point 2 (corresponding to initial transition time tt) of Fig. 7-48; (ii) the reduction of pressure decline will continue until the pressure decline becomes practically zero at point 3 (time tt0 of Fig.7-48. At this inflection point, the pressure drop (Ap0 is constant for a short period of time. (3) While the well production continues at constant rate, the pressure decline will start again to grow from point 3 to point 4 (ti,me tt~ and tt.) as a result of a transitional non-equilibrium developed between a lower 'fluid supptied rate" (by matrix blocks) and the "well fluid produced rate" from fracture networks. (4) The end of the transition time (ttj) corresponds to point 4 representing the time when a quasi-equilibrium is installed in the reservoir flowing process, between the "fracture fluid production rate" and "matrix fluid feeding rate". The difference between these two rates becomes practically constant after time tq, and from point 4 to point 5 (Fig. 7-48) results in a "quasi-steady-state" well pressure decline.
Basic interpretation of the results The pressure difference (APw) between the "early" and "later" parallel straight line separation (Fig. 7-48) is associated with the relative storage capacity of the fracture represented by (l) "~ ~f * C f / (~m * C
(7-61)
and is evaluated through co = 1 / e 2"3. APco /
m,
(7-62)
The transition period of the pressure from the "early" to the "late" straight line will be a function of the fracture-matrix interflow capacity L. This capacity could be evaluated from pressure drop (Apm) at the time tt~ as shown in Fig. 7-48: Z = (1 -03) / 1.78 * e 2"3 * ~P~./m,
(7-63)
where the parameter could be associated with the matrix-fracture contact surface (or) through which the matrix fluid flows toward the fractures: ot = )~ (k2 / k,) * (i / taw)
(7-64)
The matrix-fracture contact surface (a) is dependent on matrix block specific size L. If contact surface ot is small, the block size L is big, and vice-versa. The relationship can be expressed as follows: L ~= W / ct where for n = 3, 2, and 1; and flowing directions q~ = 60, 32, and 12.
(7-65)
IFROM FIG: 7-471
-.4
,
II
l
,AI
PERMEABILITY Kf
INTERPOROSITY
[Equation 7-67]
Flowing capacity
9
,
~f = 1.15xqx/,t/2 :rr xhxm'
~, [Eq. 7-63]
FRACTURE
=(1-w )/1.78e 2.3 AP ~/m'
Relative Storage capacity #.) => [Eq. 7-62]
r.,d= 1/e 2.3/XPO)/m'
Matrix -fracture surface contact O( [Eq. 7 - 6 4 ]
o~= ~(K2/K1)x(1/r2w) q~
FRACTURE POROSITY ~f = ~2
[Eq.7-611
~f = ~mCm ~ / c f
Matrix-block size L[Eq. 7-65]
L2
~/o~
Fig. 7-49. "Flow-chart" for quantitative evaluation of transient pressure behavior in a well producing from a fractured reservoir.
747 The slope m' of the two parallel straight lines is a function of the flowing capacity (permeability) of only the fracture network, and is independent of matrix capacity. During the final stage, between point 4 (time ttf ) and point 5 (a later time), the fracture permeability k; = k2 can be obtained from the slope of pressure vs. log time straightline: m ' = 1.15 * q *kt / 2 * re* k 2 * h
(7-66)
k2= 1.15 * q * kt/2" rc * h * m '
(7-67)
Warren-Root procedure f o r the evaluation o f a fractured limestone reservoir
Quantitative evaluation of a fractured reservoir could be carried out by plotting, on a semilog diagram, the recorded pressure drop (Ap) vs. log time. A similar procedure has to be used for both pressure drawdown and pressure build-up cases (Fig. 7-47). The calculation procedure is presented as a "flow-chart" in Fig. 7-49, where the first step is the evaluation of parameters m', APo~and Ap~ directly from the pressure vs. log time diagrams (Fig. 7-47). With these data, using equations shown in the "flow chart" it becomes possible to evaluate: (1) fracture relative storage capacity, co; (2) fracture porosity, ~/; (3) interporosity flowing capacity, ~,; (4) matrix-fractures contact surface, or; and (5) matrix block dimension, L Example 7-3." Evaluation o f fractured carbonate reservoir characteristics through transient pressure drawdown
In a natural fractured limestone reservoir a well had produced oil at a constant rate, whereas the pressure had been recorded vs. time in the first days of production. The pressure variation Ap vs. log time was plotted in Fig. 7-50. Other basic data given are: Production rate, Q = 3200 STB/D Total pay, h = 240m. Well radius, r w = 7.5 cm Matrix permeability, k = 0.1 mD. Interstitial water saturation, S i -~- 0.3
Oil viscosity, ~o = 4.6 cP Compressibility, C 1 "" 13.5.10 -6 (1/psi) C 2 = 7.2.10 -6 (1/psi) Oil volume factor, B ~ = 1.23 Fracture density, LFD = 2 / m Matrix porosity, ~m "- 0 . 2 0
Determine: (1) following the procedure described in Fig. 7-49, determine the basic data: m', Ap~, Ap~ from Fig. 7-50; and (2) using the flow chart of Fig. 7-49, determine"
748
cO "T3 cO 0
"s
4
e~
e
~o
qf
I
:o
ql,
m
-
i
./
~'
r-
0
/
~
. 9 I'M. ll
/ ..
j/.-
..
~
,..-.....=.
E-
,
' I
--'--'--
-"--"--"
0
,
-J
14
0
,,,
,,,.,,
/,~"
,
T .-
.o
o*
,
..
e"
,
,;~,,
j
0
~
0
/..x
(!sa)
,
d 7
o ,,,.
o
c~
|!
,.-
'& ,,,..
a
0 0
0
0
0 p,.
0
~D
r.~
0 0
0
r-T-I
~b
t~
749 (a) fracture network permeability (k2 = kr (b) fracture relative storage capacity, o3, and fracture porosity (~j = ~2); (c) dimensionless interporosity flowing capacity, ~; (d) matrix-fractures contact surface, c~; and (e) average block size when, due to a radial-symmetrical flow, one flowing direction can be assumed. Solution Point 1 (1) The examination of Fig. 7-50 indicates that the characteristics of this reservoir are: (a) The presence of two slopes and a relatively long transition time (second stage) qualify the reservoir as a fractured reservoir. In other words, a reservoir having both matrix and fractures, with contrasting properties. (b) From Fig. 7-50, the basic parameters are:
m' = 16.2 psi/cycle; Apo' = 24.5 psi; AP~ = 84 psi Point 2 (a) Based on m' = 16.2 (psi/cycle) = 1.102 ( a t m / c y c l e ) , and Q = 3200 STB/ D =5890 STem 3/ s the permeability based on Eq. 7-67 is"
k2 = ki= 1.15 Q * goBo / 2 * ~:* h * m ' = 1.15 * 5890 * 4.6 * 1.23 / 6.28 * 24000 * 1.102 = 0.23 (D) = 230 (mD) (b) The relative fracture storage capacity based on Eq. 7-62 gives: co = 1 /
e 2"3. 24.5/16.2
--- 0.031
and the fracture porosity using Eq. 7-61"
*f-" *m * Cm * c o / C ; = 020 * 135. 10-6 * 0.031 / 7.2. 10-6=0.0117 (c) The dimensionless interporosity flowing capacity, )~, is obtained through Eq. 7-63 (as indicated in the Fig. 7-49 flow chart): 9~= (1 - 0 . 0 3 1 ) / 1.78 e 2-3 ,84/16.2
=
8.1 . 10-6
(d) The matrix-fracture contact surface, a, based on Eq. 7-64, is equal to: ct = 8.1. 10 -6 * (0.23 / 10 -4) * (1 / 55)= 3.37 (1 / cm 2) (e) Assuming one flowing direction, the equivalent length of the blocks is given by Eq. 7-65"
750 L z = 12/3.37 (l/m) = 3.56 m :, and L = 1.88 m
EVALUATION OF MATRIX-FRACTURES IMBIBITION FLUID EXCHANGE
The fractured reservoir is much more complex than the classical non-fractured reservoir as a result of the coexistence and interaction between matrix and fractures, which are saturated with different fluids. Inasmuch as the dynamic equilibrium in the fractured reservoir is controlled by gravity and capillary forces, a more detailed examination of fluid exchange behavior between the single matrix block and its surrounding fractures is required. In principle, a "single matrix block" of a fractured reservoir represents an isolated matrix unit surrounded only by fractures and without direct communication with other matrix units (similar to the Warren-Root idealized model as shown in Fig. 7-45). In this case the fluid displacement, and in more general terms matrix / fractures fluid exchange, will depend on rock and fluid characteristics and fluid types saturating the matrix and fractures. With different fluid saturations in the matrix and fractures there will be either a drainage or imbibition displacement history depending on the wettability of the rocks. In the first analysis, a matrix block of simplified (regular) geometry (parallelipiped) is used, where both fractures and matrix are saturated with oil. Then, the effect of gas or water has to be examined. The invasion of fractures by gas will result in a downward advancement of the gas-oil displacement front in the matrix, whereas the water invasion in the fractures will have, as a consequence, an upward advancement of the water-table (water/oil contact). In the case of gas invading the fractures: (a) i.e., as shown in Fig. 7-51, the block could be partially surrounded by gas (Fig. 7.51A); or (b) completely invaded by gas (Fig. 7-51B). In the matrix, due to the difference in specific weights of gas and oil, the oil will move downward by gravity forces, whereas the capillary forces will oppose fluid exchange because the entrance of gas into the matrix as a non-wetting phase is opposed by capillary forces. This process is known as "gravity drainage displacement". A
B J. O . ~ ! .
.....
9
"~.
, ...'.'P'l:9"-'u"
:.:~ ' ~
~ "". . . .
I ~ : ~_',
~o0(~. , . .-
.. ".~(~
.
:
9 0i .'
9o " ' o - ' ~ ' . k . J .
..,.,
9~ ' " o" ...o _. .. o. ...
'-
W. ....
o
:'
...L.3....LI', .o ...........
"u-
9 ..
9
..
Fig. 7-51. Matrix block saturated with oil, with the surrounding fracture: (A) partially invaded by gas, and (B) totally invaded by gas.
751 A
[3
LEGEND ~/~'~ oil matrix ~oil
fractures
|*-'-**! water, fractures and matrix ~gas.
fractures and matrix
Fig. 7-52. Matrix block saturated with oil, with the surrounding fractures being (A) partially invaded by water, and (B) totally invaded by water.
In the case of water invading the fractures (water injection or expansion of an aquifer), the water-oil contact rises in the fracture network, partially or completely surrounding the oil-saturated matrix block with water (Fig. 52A and B). Similar to the previous case, the difference between water and oil densities will develop an upward movement of oil in the matrix. Capillary forces and gravity could both work in the favor of an upward displacement of the oil, and the production mechanism in this case is called "imbibition displacement". In cases of gravity drainage and/or imbibition, the displacement history shows the role of wettability in determining the occurrence of drainage/imbibition. Experimental studies have shown that, in the drainage case if the contact angle 0 is below 49 ~ the capillary pressure will remain unchanged. Consequently, the threshold pressure (level) or critical block height remains constant. On the contrary, imbibition is very much influenced by the magnitude of contact angle, 0. This relationship can be summarized as follows: - spontaneous imbibition is observed when 0 < 49 ~ - limited imbibition is observed when 49 ~ < 0 < 73 ~ - no imbibition is observed when 0 >73 ~ In addition, for the evaluation of displacement processes, it is necessary to know both capillary pressure vs. saturation and relative permeability vs. saturation. These relationships play a key role in displacement saturation history, and in the type of displacement process (drainage or/and imbibition). The drainage applies to the
752 TABLE 7-VIII Cases of drainage/imbibition displacement Fluid saturation Case Matrix block Fracture network
Wetting phase in matrix
Oil displacement process
Displacement history
1
oil
water
water
imbibition
Reservoir production
2
oil
water
oil
drainage
Reservoir production
3
oil
gas
oil
drainage
Reservoir production
4
gas
water
water
imbibition
Reservoir production
5
water
oil
water
drainage
Reservoir migration
6
water
gas
water
drainage
Reservoir migration
displacement processes in which the wetting phase saturation in the matrix block decreases, whereas imbibition applies to all those processes where wetting phase saturation inside the matrix increases. In the single matrix block, the displacement process is related to the type of fluid which saturates the matrix and the fractures, as well as to their reciprocal preferential wettability. The preferential wettability, the type of displacement (drainage or imbibition), and displacement history are schematized in a simplified way for six cases in Table 7-VIII. The relative permeability curves have a similar trend in both cases (drainage and imbibition displacement), whereas the capillary pressure curves have a substantially different trend in the two cases (Fig. 7-32). As a result, the combined effect of gravity-capillary forces under imbibition displacement will show a totally different behavior in the displacement history of the drainage or imbibition field process.
Single-block imbibition process An imbibition process will take place when the matrix is saturated by a non-wetting phase (oil, gas) and the fracture network is saturated by a wetting phase (water). If both capillary and gravitational forces contribute to the displacement, then the saturation of "non-wetting" phase decreases and the "wetting phase" saturation increases. The imbibition takes place when the fractures are partially saturated with water (Fig. 7-52A) or completely invaded by water (Fig. 7-52B), often called "total immersion" of matrix block. The examination of imbibition was carried out through theoretical and experimental
753 work, in order to obtain a more correct description of the process, and further to assure an acceptable convergence (matching) between experimental and theoretical results.
Empirical approach In theoretical terms, principal attention had been given to the forces involved in the imbibition process, when a matrix block is saturated with oil and the surrounding fractures with water. Aronofsky and Natanson (1958) suggested a model where the variation of recovery with time i~ based on the assumption that oil production from a small volume is a continuous, monotonic function of time and that this recovery converges to a finite limit. To this assumption is added the principle of conservation of properties during the pro cegs, which necessitates that nothing affects the rate and its limits. This function has/the following expression: R = Roo ( l - e -Bt)
(7-68)
where R is oil recovery; B is a constant indicating the rate of convergence; and R is the recovery towards which R converges (Fig. 7-53).
Simplified behavior evaluation of imbibition process Objectives In a simplified evaluation, it is assumed that the matrix block is a parallelipiped of height h, the pores of which contain oil and an irreducible water. The objective of the evaluation is to estimate the role of the gravity and capillary forces controlling the imbibition displacement of oil, when the oil-water contact in fractures is rising at various rates. Behavior evaluation is expected to obtain, for a given matrix block, the following relationship: (1) recovery vs. time; (2) single matrix block rate vs. recovery; and
r'r
>.: rT" LU
>
9 (D ill
Q:
0
TIME
Fig. 7-53. Relationship between recovery and time.
754 (3) single matrix block rate decline vs. time. Inasmuch as the imbibition process can be govemed by both gravity and capillary forces, or only by one of them, the evaluation will have to consider three cases: (1) flow controlled only by gravity forces; (2) flow controlled only by capillary forces; and (3) flow controlled by both gravity and capillary forces.
Basics of simplified model Model structure. The matrix block is assumed to be a cylinder (Fig. 7-54) where lateral walls are coated, so that fluid exchange will take place only through the lower or the upper face of the block. The "water-table" (water-oil contact in the fractures) could rise at a given height (Hw), which corresponds to a fracture oil height ( H ) so that the block height can be expressed as: HB~ock = H = H + H . The "water-front" refers to water advancement height (Z) in matrix, while the remaining oil column in matrix is H - Z. In the matrix block, the water-invaded zone of height Z and the oil zone H - Z are in contact through a horizontal cross-section A. w
Z
l /
o
LEGEND 1
~
OtL IN FRACTURES O,L ,N M T ,X
FRACTURE Oil ZONE
WATER TABLE
'-!~i-",L.,W~TE, ,., ":"---:::----- 2;i::!
FRACTURE WATER ZONE
Q Fig. 7-54. Matrix block saturated with oil and surrounded by water-saturated fractures in the case of displacement of oil by water.
755
Recovery formulation. Recovery = A * Z * ~):: = A * Z * ~ : : * AS = A * Z * ~ (1 - S i - Sr, imb)
(7-69)
where S could be considered as resulting from a piston-like displacement similar to fractional-flow oil saturation behind the front (pseudo-Buckley-Leverett). The recovery in this case is directly proportional to the displacement front distance Z.
Forces governing the flow. The capillary and gravity forces when referring to Fig. 760 are expressed by: PTota, = Pc + G = h * AT + ( H -
Z) * AT
where Pe = J ( S ) * o cos 0 * (~ / k) ~
(7-70) (7-71)
In the case where the block is surrounded by water ( H = H), the total pressure, dimensional, and dimensionless, is equal to: PTotal -- [he+ ( H - Z)] * A~/= H [(h c / H) + (1 - Z D)] * A~/
(7-72)
where Z D = Z / H
(7-73)
Displacement front velocity. The Darcy velocity considering the two zones of "oil non-invaded" and "oil invaded by water", can be written as follows: V= [h e + ( H - Z)] * AT / [(~tw/ k ) * Z + (~t~ / k ) * ( H - Z)]
(7-74)
and if the mobility M and dimensionless height are introduced in Eq. 7-74: (7-75)
M = (k w / ~tw) / (k ~ / ~to)
the velocity of Eq. 7-74 becomes: v = (k ~ / ~to) * A~, * M *
*[(h e / H) +1
-ZD] / [ZD + M,
(1
-ZD)]
(7-76)
Matrix block rate. Based on continuity of the flow in matrix" Q = A * V = A * ( k / ~to) * Ay * M* *[(he/H) + 1 - Z D ] / [ Z o + M * ( 1 - Z o ) ]
(7-77')
Time vs. recovery (general formulation). Associating the rate expressed by continuity (A *V) with the displacement front rate (dZ / dt):
756 Q = A * V = A * ~eH* dZ / dt = A * ff~H* H * d Z D/ dt
(7-77")
the time is: dt = [((Des,,* H) / ( k / Ixo) ] (M * AO* * {[ZD + M (1 - ZD)] / [(h / H + (1 - ZD)]} * dZD
(7-78)
Simplified model results Time vs. recovery. The basic relationship presented in Eq. 7-78 includes capillary and gravity forces. A better definition of the role played by each of the two forces requires an analysis of the predominance of only one or the role of both of these parameters. Case 1: Predominance of gravity forces: If capillary forces are very small compared with gravity forces, then the term h / H is negligeable in Eq. 7-78, and so, the gravity-controlled flow equation through integration becomes:
J [Zo / ( 1 -
ZDI]* dZo + M J[(1 / (1-ZD)] * d Z D - M ~ [Zo / (1 --ZD) ] * dZ o
and tD,G = (M-- 1) * Z D- I n (1 -ZD)
(7-79)
where: to.c
=
[(k / ~to)] * A~, * M * t / ~ss * H
(7-80)
The role of mobility M in accelerating or delaying the recovery may be seen in Figs. 7-55 and 7-56, indicating the variation of recovery (ZD) VS. dimensionless time tDS"Comments: In the case of gravity forces predominating as expressed in geometric terms, the block height is very big when compared with capillary height (H >> h ) as shown in Fig. 7-57A. Inversely, if the block is small and capillary height very important ( h >> H) (Fig. 7-57B), the capillary forces are predominant. Case 2: Predominance of capillary forces In the case where the capillary forces are very big as shown in case B of Fig. 7-57: hc/ H > > l - Z Dsothath / H + I - Z D - h / H
Following the same procedure as in the case of predominant gravity forces, dimensionless time is equal to: tD,PC= M * Z D+ (1 - M ) * ZD2 / 2
(7-81)
The recovery vs. dimensionless time expressed in capillary terms is plotted in Fig. 7-58.
1.0
.9
!
.8
.7 --
//
.6
ZO
.5
.4 .3
.2
m
-i
.1
o o
1
2
3 t
Fig. 7-55. Relationship between recovery
(ZD) and dimensionless
time
4
5
D,G
(too) under predominance
of gravity forces.
"--..I
"-.,1
10
ZD
OO
5
0.1
1.0
tqG Fig. 7-56. Relationship between recovery (Zo)and log dimensionless time
(to~) under predominance of gravity forces.
10
759
B
A
(
)o )o oQ )
)ooo
)C or
Oo~ | o o o r )o Oo|
0 0
t
)o o ' o )o ~
o
o
o
|
oc| o
: oo ~
,J
,oOOooi oo o oo , i , oo ~
0r
|
dlb
o~ oo o| OoO (| o o o o| o Oo' | ' oo o|
o
i
:O;O5to
o o
~ o
o
~ o
1
ooo:l
)o o
o
Oo~ | o oc| o
o50 ! h c -T
Ooo
[.
O'OoO~~ ,t~ Oo~ oOoo:oo:l H o. OoOoO~Oj 4,'
Fig. 7-57. Comparison between block height (H) and capillary height (hc) in case of gravity predominance (A) and capillary predominance (B). Case 3" Capillary and gravity forces In the presence of both forces, capillary ( h / H ) and gravity (1 -ZD), by using the same procedure a relationship between recovery (Zo) and time can be obtained: tD,G,Pc= Z D * ( M - 1) - [M + 8 * (1 - M)] * In (8 - ZD)
(7-82)
where the dimensionless time is similar to that of the gravity case: tD,G,Pc= tD,G = ( k / ~to) * (AT) * M * t~ dde//* H
(7-83)
and where 8 = 1 + hc / H
(7-84)
B l o c k rate vs. recovery. By using Eq. 7-16 where both the capillary and gravity forces
are involved in displacement of oil:
QBI, o, GC = QG,0 *
M * DFGC
(7-85)
where, based on the Muskat equation, the gravity rate could be expressed in terms of oil phase flow rate (QG0) or in terms of water phase flow rate (QGw) as follows"
QG0 = A* (k/~to) * (AT)
(7-86)
760 o. S,,.
,,
1.0
"i zD
.1
0'T
I
. . . .
0
1
2
"
I 3
tO, Pc Fig. 7-58. Variation of recovery (Zn) with dimensionless time (to,e) expresed in capillary terms. QGw = A * (l/M) * ( k / ~ w ) * (AT) The decline factors D I for various predominant forces are as follows:
DF~ = (1 -ZD) / D DF c = ( h / f 0
= (~:- 1) / D
(7-87)
DF~c = ( h / H + 1 - ZD) = (~: -- ZD) / D where
D = ZD + M ( 1 - Z D)
(7-88)
Comments: (1) the rate variation with recovery is a function of the decline factor (DF) vs. recovery (Z D) found in Eq. 7-87; and (2) since the block rate decline depends on decline factor (DF) which is related to recovery by Eq. 7-87, the association with the time will require, in addition, the introduction of recovery-time relationship of Eqs. 7-80, 7-82 and 7-83.
761
Conditions requiredfor an imbibition experiment Role of impermeablefaces. If all lateral faces in a matrix block are impermeable, and the lower and upper faces of matrix block are not, then the following scenarios of displacement could be envisaged: (1) if the lower face is kept in contact with the water (Fig. 7-59a), then the only displacing force will be the capillary force; (2) if the water level increases (Fig. 7-59b) and lateral faces remain impermeable, then both capillary and gravity forces will assist the oil displacement process; and (3) in cases where the lateral faces are permeable (Fig. 7-59c) the capillary forces will remain constant and will act over all the lateral faces where fracture water is in contact with the matrix oil. The gravity forces on the other hand will grow with depth. This may influence the shape of water-oil displacement contact in slim blocks.
Development of counterflow. If the blocks are all impermeable with exception of the lower face, then the counterflow takes place when, on the same face of the matrix block, the production of a non-wetting phase has an opposite direction of flow to that of the imbibing wetting phase. On the contrary, when the "displacing" fluid (wetting phase) and "displaced" fluid (non-wetting phase) have the same direction, the production phase indicates a direct flow. The inflow of water and the outflow of the produced oil are shown in Fig. 7-60 for the case of a permeable lower face (case "A") and for an permeable upper face (case "B"). The main difference between these two cases is the role of oil buoyancy: in case "A" the oil buoyancy opposes the capillary controlled counterflow, whereas in case "B" it supports the flow toward the permeable upper face of the block.
Influence of block size. If the blocks are large, then the fluid exchange in the vicinity of the lateral faces is reduced to a "local effect "compared with the vertical displacement through the horizontal cross-section (Fig. 7-61A). On the other hand, if the blocks are elongated (matches), then the capillary effect on the lateral faces may play a certain role (Fig. 7-61B). In laboratory imbibition experiments which have to simu~,,r
,Z
oe
e 9
9 9 e
9
/-
oe e
eoeeooe
9
i--~
9
'
|
|
r
:
"
j
I
o
I
'
~._
A
L
,,~i~ t
~
9 Fig. 7-59. Role of forces in the case of impermeable lateral faces (cases a and b) and permeable lateral faces (case c): (a) capillary forces; (b) capillary and gravity forces on bottom face and (c) gravity and capillary forces on lateral faces and on bottom face.
762
B
A ~lil@lll~li~ll~,
~N,/ / / / / / /
% *
~149149
i ~
9
,~ !! 7//2.4.//1~ I / / i ~ - / / I ill i /////,'
','.'.V / / / / / / ~ ",r
/////./.,'ill
IIJ / /
9 . ::(.'":.
i11"//'-~111//illJ///
Fig. 7-60. Examples of: (A) counterflow through bottom face and (B) direct flow through top face of matrix block. (Legend as in Fig. 7-61.)
late the imbibition behavior of medium to large block size, the lateral faces of the core used in laboratory have to be made impermeable.
Evaluation of gravity drainage matrix-fracturefluid exchange Drainage displacement takes place when the wetting phase, which saturates the matrix, is displaced by a non-wetting phase, thus saturating the fracture network. A common case will be represented by the expansion of the gas-cap so that the gas (nonwetting phase) invades the fractures while the matrix blocks are saturated with oil. Similar behavior patterns occur throughout the oil migration history when the frac-
A
B Oil
9....-
. . :w: .-.... ,..
9
"
"
""
;
LEGEND
{~]
".
"--
, "
woter oil
".."
on
rr~trnx
"
. . . . "
""
Longitudinal section
.
9
.
9
oi|
zone
9
9
9
"
Transversal section
I ~ oll in floctutes /~_-//Ir,~permeol:,le
Fig. 7-61. Role of lateral and vertical displacement vs. block dimension: (A) large blocks and (B) narrow blocks.
763 tures initially saturated with water (wetting phase) are invaded by oil (as a non-wetting phase) which will displace the water from the matrix blocks. A less common case of drainage may be that of an oil-wet reservoir, where oil (wetting phase) saturating the matrix is displaced by the water (non-wetting phase) saturating the fractures. In general, it may be stated that production mechanisms such as expansion, solution-gas drive, water imbibition, and gas gravity drainage all may contribute to production of oil at different stages of the production life of a fractured reservoir. But the gas gravity drainage takes place mainly when gas from gas-saturated fractures displaces the oil of the matrix. The free gas may be internal gas (liberated from oil as a result of reservoir depletion) which has segregated in fractures forming a fracture gas-cap, or external gas injected into the reservoir. In both cases, the advancement of gas in fractures and the difference in density resulting between the fracture gas and matrix oil will provide the energy for the gas-gravity-drainage process. What is unique in the gas-gravity-drainage production mechanism is that oil production can take place without any pressure decline (depletion) if the field rate is not higher than field gravity-drainage rate.
Single-block gravity-drainage process In a classic gravity-drainage process it is expected that the free gas would invade the fractures surrounding the oil-saturated matrix blocks. Oil starts to drain downward because of the gravity difference between gas and oil, while gas enters on the top of the block to replace the produced oil.
Simplified analysis Geometrical-physical aspects. Considering a single block as in Fig. 7-62, its particularities for a gravity-drainage flow are" (1) the top of the matrix block is the reference level; (2) the lateral faces of the block are impermeable; (3) the gas front position is at a distance Z from the reference plane (Z = 0, corresponding to the top of matrix block); and (4) if the block height is H and the threshold height is hTw the maximum Z value is Zax = H-hTH. Block height vs. threshold height relationship. Inasmuch as in drainage conditions the non-wetting phase (gas) has to displace the wetting phase (oil), the gravity force is opposed by capillary force. In general, this relationship, based on Fig. 7-62, could be written as: pG - Pc = ( H - Z) * A7 - hvH * A7
(7-89)
The initial rate corresponds to initial conditions (Z = 0), and the final production rate takes place when the front reaches the threshold level Zax = H-hTH. For an understanding of this mechanism, three cases are presented in Fig. 7-63 during the advancement of gas-oil displacement front. In all these cases capillary pressure is constant with depth, whereas gravity force increases with depth. Furthermore, on this face of the block in cases "a" and "b" oil is produced since on the bottom face the gravity forces > threshold capillary forces (G > P ) . In case "c", where pressure P =
764
~
:::.'//,
: .:..g
**,
* 9
,* *
******
IMPERMEABLE rA'
. :o o ::o o.:. o.:. ,oli..o:.o.:0 .o,: ~176176176
:i:il
OIL IN FRACTURE
g! !
R ,
OIL IN MATRIX
[2.'2"2~~ GAS
***~
Fig. 7-62. Displacement of oil from a block where fractures are totally surrounded by gas. G, the flow (at the bottom face of the block) stops and the oil remaining in the block represents the "oil hold-up zone". Inasmuch as both forces have the same fluid density difference (Ay), the dynamic cases "a" and "b" could be expressed as ( H - Z ) > her , whereas in case "c" (the static condition), H - Z max-- hrH" Equilibrium vs. gas-oil contact in matrix and fractures. By using the representation indicated in Fig. 7-64, and referring to the bottom of the matrix through which the block production takes place, the level 3 of the block (Fig. 7-64B) reflects the threshold height her= hTH of capillary pressure curve (Fig. 7-64A). As observed in Fig. 764C, the gravity is higher than threshold gradient when the displacement front is in positions 1 and 2, which represent a non-equilibrium gas-oil contact. A static equilibrium will be reached when the displacement front arrives in position 3, where both threshold gradient and gravity are equal. Thus, the block will retain a column of unrecoverable oil due to capillary forces. It is called a capillary holdup zone having height h 3 = hra. From the initial condition of non-equilibrium to the final equilibrium condition, it is easy to conclude that if the block height H < h = h TH' then the recovery of oil is not possible at all just because the block height is srmaller than the capillary holdup height. Role o f block height vs. recovery. For a better understanding of the role of block height (H), a capillary pressure curve is presented in Fig. 7-65. For single matrix blocks (1,2,3,4) of different heights, the recovery will depend on block height. Block 1 (the smallest) will contain unrecoverable oil, block 2 (higher) oil will be slightly recovered, and more oil will be recovered in blocks 3 and 4. This means that in taller blocks the gravity forces could overcome (for a certain part of the block height) the capillary resistance to gas entrance and, therefore, would displace the oil. Role o f rock characteristics vs. recovery. If the matrix blocks have the same height
765
--
*AT,. --
hTH
1 /
}
,
n,.,
Block B o t t o m Face
o
,,,~,
o
o
.,,
..
t,
G>>P c
Flow assured by
./$-/= /
-
Z" L
Block B o t t o m Face Flow assured by
,,
G~P C
o-
-o
~o
o
oo
,o~ f
o
oo
4,
~o0--
K~
, o o~176176176
Block B o t t o m Face Flow is s t o p p e d b e c a u s e
G=P c
Fig. 7-63. Oil produced from an oil-saturated matrix block, if the surrounding fractures are saturated with gas, by examining the relative magnitude of gravity and capillary forces.
but are of different petrophysical characteristics, then recovery will depend on the capillary pressure curves of blocks A, B and C (Fig. 7-66). Considering the following characteristics:
766
),c = Pc/(~'o-~'Q)
|:(/GUO". O.:':.o-?.:W.:.>
..... ;,~,..-..o.~.., 6 0..t p!~:U.~.O,c?.~..i~~.!
I?:r
ibo.a( ).o.:~
!,,4,,,'~ :o:.. "1,2' "v-. ;O: ""::L~.' ___IV~'.:'U ,V.',~:.'.o ....: 9..r
' '. o..- -~:
.' .:,r ".~.
f-D:, ~o:~::~el',. I 10.:., :]:o..~ 1 ~....~l"a :o. "~.'Lr
".'d:v. :'"
! g: +;.+:,O. o o ~ I l...o. ~.!e~,T,+~.~ I
I~'.~ .":o "A. I/ "." f2:~:4"1:-
:( .*.0.M- ~ " . ' i ) : ,, ~:.., ;~ :.'.- ..,;r162
.~.,
3! ......
3
ii
0 0
Sw
!
":':"
~o \\\~
~:~7
Equil.
~,.~: BOTTOM"
gas-oil ~...cont act
! !
~;', hTH=h3
!;~
L:~]
q-
2 ~
i:~:
I~:~
I 7b
I
I
""
:~ :;=.
~.:""[
V/'
hTH
% I
II
I ~--.--.--- - ~
PTHH] ~:i ::.'..
Po
!
"capillary
100
"" ~
equilib.
oil press.I _\~
gas-oil
grad.
contact
[ \ - ~ ~
....
hold-up zone
Po:Pg FPc~
A
B
C
Fig. 7-64. Relationship between gravity and capillary forces in drainge displacement: (A) capillary curve, (B) drainage displacement in the block, (C) equilibrium of gas-oil contact at matrix-fracture interface. Zone hrHis equal to capillary hold-up zone.
<3 o.o H
o
?_
'.~P"f t'3 | \'2F
,.'t'~o-;-zd:7 " .'0" i
: ~ ;
il
:9"
"
9
~,
'~I~'.,i(7.]:~ .."
o..-a..' .~.~--
,.
0
;
100
Sw
capillary hold-up zone Fig.
"..
7-65. Capillary hold-up zone for various block heights.
-.
767 which correspond to hTH A < hTr~B < hrH c, it may be stated that because block C height is smaller than the capi|'|ary hold-up ~eight, oil recovery is impossible, whereas the oil in block A is largely recovered, and only with a very limited hold-up zone because its height is substantially greater than hold-up height.
Basic simplified evaluation In the simplified model of Fig. 7-62, the displacement of oil by gas could be carried-out through the same procedure used in case of water imbibition. The displacement forces expressed by the difference between gravity and capillary pressures could be written as: (7-90)
G - Pc = ( H - Z - hTn) * Aqt'
because Pc = PTH = hTH * Aqt' and where A~/' = 3'o- 3' 9 Inasmuch as the threshold height (htH) is equal to ]he hold-up zone, the recoverable column of oil has the height H - hTn , which corresponds to Z=Z max" The drainage time (t') vs. recovery (ZD) relationship based on the displacement front rate can be expressed as: [(k / kto)* M'* A~/' / (~e;; */4)] * dt = (7-91)
{[ZD + m'* (1 --ZD) ] / [1 --(hTH / H ) - Z D ] }*dZ D which by integration will give:
(7-92)
t'D= Z D * ( M ' - 1 ) - [M' + e' * ( 1 - M')]* In (d--ZD)
K A > KB >K C
(DA > (])B > (Dc hBLOCK > hTH,A I
hBLOCK > hTH,B
,B
tO' PTH.C
hBLOCK < hTH,C
:".':"'.~:,~"." ~'.--'*.~*'0"~'Ud ".-. ~. :o.~,..*:-. ~, 9 .",e"*. ~O.*.' ~..o...0.O~ r r 0
Sw
PTH,B
~.'1
"ii: ~ ,
9
"
PTH,A
100
A
B
C
Fig. 7-66. Blocks A,B,C of equal size but having different properties. Heights of displaced oil and oil hold-up zones depend on capillary pressure curve characteristics.
768 where: M' = ( k / ~s) (ko / ~o). The dimensionless drainage time (Eq. 7-92) is similar to imbibition gravity dimensionless time: t'D,G,PC = t'D,G = (Ko / ~o) * AT' * ~
t;' = 1 -
hTH
*
(I /
H * 0eii) * t'
/H
(7-93) (7-94)
The block drainage rate is equal to: Q' BI , 0, GC = Q , o,o 9 M'
9
DF'oc
\(-7- _ . ,o . . s, ]~
where Q'~,o = A * ( k / ~to) * AT'
(7-96)
Q'G,w = A * (1/3//') * ( k / law) * AY'
(7-97)
and the decline factor is: DF'c, c = ( 1 - - Z D - - h l H) I D ' = (~' - ZD)/D'
(7-98)
where: D ' = Z D +M'. (1--ZD)
(7-99')
and 5' = 1 - h / H
(7-99")
In a case where the block is very tall and capillary force is negligible, the hold-up zone will not play any role and the flow will be controlled only by the gravity force. The above relationship will result in the following: (1) Dimensionless time vs. recovery relationship will change from Eq. 7-92 of drainage displacement to an equation similar to Eq. 7-80 (obtained at imbibition conditions): t'D,C,pc = t'D,G = (M' - 1)* Z D- In (1 - ZD)
(7-100)
(2) A decline factor similar to that obtained during imbibition when flow is controlled by the gravity forces: DF' G = (1 -ZD) / D'
(7-101)
769 CONCLUDING REMARKS
Taking into account the findings of Festoy and Van Golf-Racht (1989) that the matrix is much more continuous in the reservoir than what appears from core examinations, the single-block model of Warren and Root (1963) can be often substituted by a stack of blocks model resulting from a tortuously continuous matrix. Physically, the 'stack-of-blocks' will represent a stack of matrix blocks separated by fractures, but with additional connections through matrix over a limited crosssectional area between the blocks. In this case, the oil produced from the base of one block reinfiltrates into the block below and the gas-invaded zone is represented by a number of single blocks stacked on each other. Oil drains downward from block to block to the gas-oil contact.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author is greatly indebted to Professor George V. Chilingarian for his invaluable help.
REFERENCES Aronofsky, J.S., Mass6, L. and Natanson, S.G., 1958. A model for the mechanism of oil recovery from the porous matrix due to water invasion in fractured reservoir. Trans. AIME, 213:17 - 19. Barenblatt, G.I., Zheltov, Y.P. and Kochina I.N., 1960. Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks. J. Appl. Math. Mech., 24(5): 852 - 864. Dunnington, H.V., 1967. Aspects of diagenesis and shape change in stylolitic limestone reservoirs. Proc. VII World Petrol. Congress, Mexico, 2, Panel Discussion, 3:13 - 22. Festoy, S. and Van Golf-Racht, T.D., 1989. Gas gravity drainage in fractured reservoirs through new dual-continuum approach. SPE Res. Engr. J., 4(Aug.): 271 - 278. Geertsma, J., 1974. Estimating coefficient of inertial resistance in fluid flow through porous media. J. Petrol. Techn.26(10): 445 - 449. Leroy, G., 1976. Cours de g6ologie de production. Inst. Franfais du P~trole, Paris, pp. 1 1 2 - 163. Murray, G.H., 1977. Quantitative fracture study, Sanish Pool: Fracture-controlled production.Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Reprint Series, 21:117 - 125. Park, W.C. and Schott, E.H., 1968. Stylolitisation in carbonate rocks. In: G. Muller and G.M. Friedman (Editors), Recent Developments in Carbonate Sedimentology in Central Europe. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 3 4 - 63. Pollard, P., 1959. Evaluation of acid treatment from pressure build-up analysis. Trans. AIME, 2 1 6 : 3 8 - 4 3 . Reiss, L.H., 1966. Reservoir Engineering en Milieu FissurO. French Institute of Petroleum, Paris, Ed. Technip, pp. 7 6 - 95 Ruhland, R., 1975. M6thode d'6tude de la fracturation naturelle des roches, associ6 a divers mod61es structuraux. Bull. Geol. Soc. Frangais, 26, ( 2 - 3 ) : 91 - 113. Snow, D.T., 1965. A Parallel Plate Model of Fractured Permeable Media. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Califomia, Berkley, 330 pp. Steams, D.W. and Friedman, M., 1972. Reservoir in fractured rock. In: R.E. King (Editor), inStratigraphic Oil and Gas Fields, Classification, Exploration Methods and Case Histories. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 16:82 - 106. Van Golf-Racht, T.D., 1982. Fundamentals of Fractured Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam: pp. 5 1 - 109. Warren, J.E. and Root, P.J., 1963. The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. Trans. AIME, 228:245 -255.
770
SYMBOLS
Latin letters a
dimension, fracture extension Constant of laminar flowing equation Fracture opening - Oil volume factor Constant of turbulent flow equation - Capillary c - Compressibility C Diameter D - Decline factor DF FINT - Fracture intensity G - Gravity G O R - G a s / o i l ratio h - Formation pay hvn - Threshold height H - Block height H - Horizontal J ( S w) - L e v e r e t t f u n c t i o n k - Permeability l,L - Length LFD - Linear fracture density M - Mobility Np -Cumulative oil p r o d u c e d n - Number of fractures p - Pressure PI - Productivity index Q - V o l u m e t r i c rate o f f l o w Re - Reynolds number S - Area S, S - O i l and water saturation, percent of pore space r - Radius tD - Dimensionless time t - Production time ~" - Velocity WC - W a t e r cut W - encroached water x,y,z - Cartesian axis Z - Height A b Bo B~
- B l o c k -
G r e e k letters
Matrix-fracture surface contact - Turbulence factor -
771
Density
-
A
- Difference Strain
-
-Interporosity ~t
- Viscosity
v
-
9
flowing
capacity
Kinetic viscosity
- Specific mass - Stress - Porosity -
f.o
C
o
n
s
t
a
n
t
-Relative
r el at ed to f l o wi n g
direction
fracture storage capacity
Subscripts BL
- Block
cr
- Critical
c
- Capillary
D
- Dimensionless
DG
-Dimensionless
in gravity terms
DP c
- Dimensionless
in capillary terms
e
- External,
drainage
eff
- Effective
f
- Fracture
ff
- Intrinsic fracture
m
- Matrix
o
- Oil
or
- Oil, residual
or, i m b - O i l i m b i b i t i o n , T
residual
- Turbulence
Th
- Threshold
w
- Well
w
- Water
wett wi w-o x,y,z
- Wetting - Interstitial water - Water-oil - Axis direction
1
- Matrix
2
- Fracture
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
773
Chapter 8
C H A L K RESERVOIRS GERALD M. FRIEDMAN
"In worla'ng over the soundings collected by Captain Dayman, I was surprised to find that many of what I have called "granules" of that mud were not, as one might have been tempted to think at first, the mere powder and waste of Globigerinae, but that they had a definite form and size. I termed these bodies "coccoliths." '7 have recently traced out the development of the coccoliths from a diameter of 1/7000 of an inch up to their largest size (which is about 1/1600) and no longer doubt that they are produced by independent organisms." Thomas H. Huxley (1825-1895) On a piece of chalk (1868)
GENERAL STATEMENT
Electron microscopy has revealed that many fine-textured, apparently unfossiliferous limestones of deep-sea origin consist almost entirely of the remains of pelagic nannofossil coccoliths (Figs. 8-1A, B and 2). Each coccolith consists of an intricately organized structure composed of calcite crystals between 0.25 and 1.0 ~tm in diameter, which together form spherical to oval disks about 2-20 ~tm broad in the plane of flattening. Coccoliths are known in sedimentary rocks of Jurassic to Recent age. Chalk is a friable, fine-textured limestone composed dominantly of coccoliths, but in which pelagic foraminifera also occur. Coccoliths accumulate initially as oozes, and later become chalk when lithified (Schlanger and Douglas, 1974; Garrison, 1981). Modem oceans abound in coccoliths (Fig. 8-2). The Upper Cretaceous Chalk, for example, which is 2 0 0 - 400 m or more in thickness, is so distinctive and so widely distributed in western Europe that it inspired the name for a geologic period: the Cretaceous (creta, from the Latin, meaning chalk). These rocks are considered to be open sea-type deposits that accumulated on the bottom of a moderately deep (+ 250 m), tropical shelf sea. Many of the sedimentologic and compositional characteristics of this chalk closely match those of modem, pelagic deep-sea oozes (Friedman and Sanders, 1978). The European Cretaceous chalk contains abundant chert beds and nodules. The centers of many of the chert nodules commonly contain non-replaced chalk which, when dissolved in hydrochloric acid, contains insoluble residues with abundant siliceous sponge spicules. In contrast, outside chert nodules few such spicules are found. Presumably, the spicules were in fact formerly present within unsilicified chalk in as
774
A
B
Fig. 8-1. (A) Scanning-electron micrograph of skeleton of coccolith (Coccolithus cfi C. barnesae), Isfya Chalk (Upper Cretaceous), Mount Carmel, Israel (A. Bein). (From Friedman and Sanders, 1978; reprinted with permission from the authors.) (B) "Coccoliths now known to be the remnants of unicellular algae". (From T.H. Huxley, 1868.)
775
Fig. 8-2. Scanning-electron micrograph of tiny suspended particles filtered from surface water of the western Atlantic Ocean at 34~ 77~ 30 December 1971. The prominent particle in the upper left consists of bound-together coccospheres; coccospheres in the right area of photograph have been bound to unidentified particle, probably organic matter (J.W. Pierce). (From Friedman and Sanders, 1978; reprinted with permission from the authors.)
great an abundance as within chalk remnants in chert nodules. It is likely that most or all of these spicules were dissolved so as to provide silica that subsequently was reprecipitated as chert. This chert probably was precipitated initially as opal and subsequently converted to cristobalite and, ultimately, to stable quartz (Friedman and Sanders, 1978). In addition to sponge spicules and chert, minor constituents in the European Cretaceous chalks include radiolarians, pelecypod shell fragments (notably, those of Inoceramus spp.), echinoderm fragments, bryozoans, and bone fragments.
RESERVOIRS IN CHALKS
Significant hydrocarbon reservoirs, which are developed in chalks, occur mainly in Cretaceous to Paleocene deposits in the North Sea, and in Cretaceous deposits in the Gulf Coast and western interior seaway provinces in North America. These important sites of hydrocarbon production are discussed below. North sea reservoirs Background
In 1969, the writer taught a short course in England on carbonate reservoirs. One of the participants in this course was the manager for Philips Petroleum Company. All his questions related to chalk because, at that time, Philips was drilling a structure in the North Sea whose objective was chalk. As of 1969, two hundred dry holes had already been drilled in the North Sea, and the exploration community derided Philips
776 b e c a u s e conventional " w i s d o m " at the time was that there was no oil to be found in the region. The writer also was skeptical and explained to the Philips m a n a g e r that a l t h o u g h the micron-size coccoliths w h i c h c o m p o s e chalk m a y exhibit g o o d intercoccolith porosity, such pores were only o f micron size (micropores: 1 - 5 lam) and
.
i N
:i " S C 0
T L A
D
.....:~i~i~i!:ii:.ii:iiii::i:ii~ili~i~, ...............::...................... :: _ ....... : : ,/:
0
R
W
.A Y,~,~:
~
i r
.,
,,:
C.7~,
i.
,.o ,~o.
~
] /
,.,#
,
./
~
w E.S r e E R M ^ N V 1
I
d / ~'~,,~,~,,os/ ,
:.k
i 5,
~o~,
.4" /
......................~............~ ................... Fig. 8-3. Ekofisk Field in the Central Graben, southern part of the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. (From Van ddn Bark and Thomas, 1980; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
777
thus closer to narrow pore throats than to the open pores which typically give rise to good permeability in reservoirs. However, the writer felt that the large structures which were indicated on company seismic sections likely resulted from the movement of low-density salt through overlying strata, probably of Miocene age, which domed the chalk and created abundant fractures which could provide for excellent permeability. It turned out that fracturing indeed has contributed to the excellent reservoir characteristics that make the North Sea chalk so economically important. Three months after completion of the short course the writer received a communication from Philips Petroleum in London, announcing the discovery of Ekofisk Field, now known to be one of the world's giant petroleum reservoirs (Fig. 8-3). Yet, even as late as the spring of 1970 Sir Eric Drake, then chairman of British Petroleum, remarked that "... there won't be a major (oil) field out there (in the North Sea) but BP had obligation to show themselves as explorers, and so work would continue." (Alger, 1991). The first North Sea oil which came ashore in 1971 was from the chalk of Ekofisk Field. Mapping by the common reflection-datapoint system led to the discovery of Ekofisk Field. The Ekofisk Formation, of Danian (Paleocene) age, caps a thick section of
C H A L K FORMATIONS |
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
E K O F I S K FORMATION , "'
STAGE ,
I
DANIAN
i
1 'i
MAASTRICHTIAN TOR FORMATION
9
13.. i ::3 i O n" ' (..9 ,,r -J < "1" O
. . . . .
L
9
CAMPANIAN
H O D FORMATION
SANTONIAN
CONIACIAN TURONIAN 9
i
9
1
l
P L E N U S M A R L FORMATION ,
i
J HIDRA FORMATION
CENOMANIAN 9
,,
|
Fig. 8-4. Stratigraphy of the North Sea chalk within the Central Graben. (From Feazel and Farrell, 1988; reprinted with permission from SEPM, the Society for Sedimentary Geology.)
778 Cretaceous chalks and other carbonates (Fig. 8-4). A seismic reflector located just above the top of the Ekofisk Formation (the Maureen Formation: Fig. 8-5) showed 244 m of closure over an area of 49 km 2 in and around the field. The first well drilled encountered mechanical problems and had to be abandoned. A second well yielded flow rates in excess of 10,000 BOD (barrels of oil per day). The subsequent third, fourth and fifth wells tested 3850 BOD, 3788 BOD, and 3230 BOD, respectively. GAMMA L I T H RAY OLOGY
SONIC
/
9500'~2895m
/
2900m
/ / / /
9700~
/ /
I
/
9500' -2950m
9700' -
.,
n
t
I
,,r !,i :i
10,000'-l'-
.
:
~0.206' \
Laooom
11
i;
\ \
\
,
1
]
\ \ \\
11,000' 1 03
W
10,000'- 3050m
\
t
i ~
[
I
[
-1
I I:-
"
,
,
3100m
-o lO.2o~'
~LU
-,
12,000' -,
IUJ
,tr
I i
tr
i
_d
10,500'.-3200m
13,000'~
Fig. 8-5. Cretaceous and lower Tertiary lithostratigraphic nomenclature in the Ekofisk area, North Sea. (From Van den Bark and Thomas, 1980; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
779
After installation of a permanent platform the next well encountered 315 m of pay in the chalk section (Van den Bark and Thomas, 1980). Since the discovery of Ekofisk Field in 1969, six other fields have been discovered that produce oil, gas, and condensate from chalk reservoirs (Fig. 8-6). The productive units in this area include the Tor Formation (Maastrichtian, Upper Cretaceous) and the Ekofisk Formation (Danian, Paleocene) (Figs. 8-4 and 8-5). The fields lie within
\ \
\
~57"00'N \ I I
\ I
\
l
~
56 ~ 4O'N
\
~,W.~ISK~
2 c 40'E %
\ %
%~
$6 ~ 30'N
\ \
"/'\TJ-
'
"~'"
i
[
\,,,,i 1 ~ O0'E
3 o 40"N
Fig. 8-6. Location map of the Greater Ekofisk Area fields, central North Sea. (From Feazel and Farrell, 1988" reprintedwith permission from SEPM, the Society for Sedimentary Geology.)
3 R O S S PAY 9 NET PAY 9 rIME INTERVAL
9
2/4-3X
2/4-1AX
710' 295' O. 1 1 0 S E C .
758' 620' O. 15O S E C . I n tqlrll ~ I r
--.I
2/4-4AX 698' 410'
o. 120 S E C . 11,680'
/ SEC.
2.5
o9 Q z o o I.tl 3.0 r~ Z LU I-
0 F'3.5
Fig. 8-7. North-to-south seismic cross-section integrates borehole and seismic data to show the high porosity limits of the field. (From Van den Bark and t h o m a s , 1980; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
781
the Central Graben in the southern part of the Norwegian sector of the North Sea (Fig. 8-3). Ekofisk, Eldfisk, Edda, Tor, West Ekofisk, and Albuskjell fields are collectively known as the "Greater Ekofisk Complex." Of these fields, however, Ekofisk is the largest in terms of size (Figs. 8-7 and 8-8) and reserves: estimated in-place reserves are 5.3 MMMBO (billions of barrels), 6.68 TCFG (trillion cubic feet of gas), and 63 MMB (million barrels) of condensate at the time of discovery. Together, the seven fields contain recoverable reserves in excess of 1.8 MMMBO and 6.6 TCFG (D'Heur, 1984; Brewster et al., 1986).
I.Lu tu
t~ t~ iii
-9OOO
-10,000
280O
30OO
-11,000 - ~
5 ~
v
J
t
3200
~
..."-- 1 5
--..~
10 ~ ,, > - > 5
Fig. 8-8. Isometric projection of the Ekofisk Field. (From Van den Bark and Thomas, 1980; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
782
Geology The Central Graben is a rift of Late Permian to Early Triassic age that was active until the Early Cretaceous (Ziegler, 1975). Permian, Triassic, and Jurassic sediments filled the graben and responded to intermittent fault movement prior to Cretaceous sedimentation (Ziegler, 1982). The Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay is the source rock for the chalk reservoirs in the Greater Ekofisk Complex. Beginning in the late Jurassic, and continuing into the Miocene, salt flowage and diapirism of the underlying Permian Zechstein beds, together with basement faulting, created domed low-amplitude folds that became the traps for hydrocarbons in the chalk reservoirs (Brewster et al., 1986). Rifting may have accelerated active salt movement. During the Cretaceous and Paleocene pelagic coccoliths accumulated to form the reservoir facies in an environment devoid of terrigenous input. Subsidence of the graben continued into later Tertiary time, and approximately 3000 m of now overpressured shale was deposited over the chalk, serving as a seal to the reservoir. The oil in the chalk is in an abnormallypressured environment.
Reservoir facies and diagenesis Two types of chalk deposits that compose the reservoirs in this area are recognized: (1) autochthonous (in-place) chalk, interpreted as being strictly of pelagic origin and which was not subjected to postdepositional resedimentation. This chalk typically is argillaceous and either laminated or burrow-mottled; and (2)allochthonous (reworked) chalk, that is, chalks which after initial deposition were resedimented into deeper-water environments by sliding, slumping, transport by turbidity currents, and mass-transport as debris flows facilitated by sediment instability caused by tectonism in the graben rift zone. The distinction between autochthonous and allochthonous chalks is of importance in reservoir development and performance. For example, the allochthonous chalk has higher porosity, and typically composes better reservoirs, than the autochthonous chalks because: (1) particles of pore throat-clogging siliciclastic clay have been winnowed out; (2) the sediment is relatively well-sorted in terms of particle and pore size; and (3) rapid deposition did not allow for subsequent bioturbation which facilitates porosity-occluding cementation (Hancock and Scholle, 1975; Kennedy, 1980, 1987; Watts et al., 1980; Hardman, 1982; Nygaard et al., 1983; Schatzinger et al., 1985; Jorgensen, 1986; Bromley and Ekdale, 1987; Feazel and Farrell, 1988). The coccoliths which compose chalks consist mineralogically of low-magnesian calcite, which is stable at surface and near-surface pressures and temperatures. Hence, it would seem that chalk would not undergo significant diagenetic changes through time. With progressive burial, however, chalk is known to be affected by a consistent sequence of diagenetic changes that cause reservoir development. Diagenetic hardgrounds resulting from early, submarine cementation are responsible for local lack of interparticle porosity and declines in productivity in some chalk reservoirs. In the absence of such hardgrounds, the original high-porosity, water-saturated oozes became progressively less porous with early, shallow burial below the sediment-water interface as a result of mechanical compaction and dewatering. Primary interparticle porosity was reduced by as much as 50 - 80% in some cases. Cores of some chalks have porosities near 50%, which means that only minor porosity occlusion by later
783 chemical compaction and cementation (discussed below) has occurred subsequent to early mechanical compaction. With increased burial depths, chemical compaction (i.e., pressure-solution) occurred, the effects ranging from small-scale (e.g., interpenetrative grain contacts) to the extensive development of stylolites. The process of stylolitization is believed to liberate vast quantities of CaCO3,which can be reprecipitated as interparticle pore-filling calcite cements that further reduce porosity. Cementation by calcite derived from this process has occurred throughout the Eldfisk Field chalk reservoir. Oxygen isotopic compositions of the calcite cements in these rocks suggest a pore-water temperature of 5 0 - 80~ during chalk dissolution and cement reprecipitation. Values of 5~3C PDB of these cements increase with depth, indicating an associated cementation process involving bacterial methanogenesis (Maliva et al., 1991). On the smaller scale, substantial reduction of interparticle porosity in chalks commonly also results from related dissolution along the contacts of adjoining coccolith plates in reservoir zones in which overburden stresses were high. Such a process involves calcite dissolution along grain-to-grain contacts, with resulting interpenetration of grains and an increase in bulk volume and density. The calcite liberated by dissolution likewise can be reprecipitated in nearby pores, or as overgrowths on adjoining coccolith plates, both processes reducing total interparticle porosity. Where this process has been dominant, a tightly interlocking mosaic of calcite crystals generates chalks with littleeffective porosity (van den Bark and Thomas, 1980). Despite burial to depths in excess of 3000 m, however, many chalks still have interparticle porosities as high as 30-40%. The preservation of high primary porosities is due to four inter-related factors: (1) the chalks are characterized by over-pressured pore fluids which reduce the grain-to-grain stresses and, hence, additional mechanical and chemical compaction; (2) pore fluids are relatively rich in dissolved magnesium which retards carbonate dissolution and subsequent cementation; (3) in this vein, because of their stable low-magnesian calcite composition chalks have a limited diagenetic potential for dissolution-cement reprecipitation as do sediments dominated by aragonitic mineralogies; and (4) early arrival of hydrocarbons into the pores. When hydrocarbons are trapped in pores, all cementation ceases (Scholle, 1975, 1977; Friedman and Sanders, 1978; D'Heur, 1984; Feazel et al., 1985; Feazel and Schatzinger, 1985; Maliva et al., 1991; Maliva and Dickson, 1992). A combination of the great thickness of overburden sediment (> 3,000 m), together with a high heat flow related to continuing rifting and graben development in the North Sea, caused salt diapirism and piercement in the productive area during the Tertiary. These salt movements not only generated extensive fracture systems, which became avenues for hydrocarbon migration, but the fractures also contribute extensively to the effective porosity and permeability of the chalk reservoirs here (Mimran, 1977). Large fractures may be related to the Tertiary tectonic history, whereas small fractures may represent minor tectonic adjustments to stylolitization. Fracturing increases with depth, and this general trend is coincident with increases in effective porosity. Also, effective porosity increases towards the structural crests of fields as a result of the higher incidence of fractures (Van den Bark and Thomas, 1980).
784
Ot
Of
$7/
7r
(::%3
"
03
03
O" I
TECTONIC
FRACTURES
Oi STYLOLITEASSOCIATED FRACTURES
Fig. 8-9. Sketch illustrating the relationship between the major fracture types and the principal stress axes in cores of the North Sea chalk. (FromFeazel and Farrell, 1988; reprinted with permission from the SEPM, the Society for Sedimentary Geology.) Fractures create reservoir permeabilities of up to 200 mD, and are of three kinds" (1) healed fractures; (2) tectonic fractures; and (3) stylolite-associated fractures (Fig. 8-9). Healed fractures are not porous; oil-staining, however, suggests that they may have once been open to hydrocarbon flow, but now are filled with carbonate that looks like chalk. Tectonic fractures are open to fluid flow, their formation being a response to vertical, maximum principal stress. These fractures actually are small faults that dip between 6 0 - 70 ~ Stylolite-associated fractures form contiguous to stylolites, and tend to be vertical (Nelson, 1981; Watts, 1983; Feazel and Farrell, 1988). The development of fractures, open stylolites, and microstylolitic seams is necessary to permit pressure-solution (Ekdale and Bromley, 1988; Morse and Mackenzie, 1990). North American reservoirs Austin Chalk The Austin Chalk is Upper Cretaceous in age (Fig. 8-10) and underlies much of east and central Texas as well as the Texas Gulf Coast. The structural strike of this formation is to the northeast-southwest, and extends approximately 520 km along strike (Fig. 8-11). The dip of the Austin Chalk into the Gulf Coast Basin is 1 - 4 ~ The thickness of the chalk varies from approximately 70 - 170 m. Its composition is similar to that of the North Sea chalk, but commonly present are pyrite, glauconite, tephra, and skeletal fragments. In contrast, however, porosity is low, ranging from 3 - 9 %, and permeabilities are generally less than 0.5 mD, most commonly, less than 0.1 mD.
785 a)
n
i
i
Wilcox
o
"~
i
illl
i O
o
I~
-~ ft..
Midway _
l
Navarro
O
Taylor
O
O t-~
c/)
Austin
m
(.9
0 (1) r t~ (1)
O
[
I,._
!
I 1
Eagle Fold
i .
.
L
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Woodbine
t"
Q) tc..) '
r"
E
c) o
Oel Rio Georgetown
O
Edwards
O
Fig. 8-10. Generalized stratigraphy of Giddings Field area; productive intervals are marked with black dots. (Modified from Kuich, 1990; reprinted with permission from World Oil.)
Porosity and permeability decrease with increasing burial depth. The best chalk production is from a depth of 1 5 0 0 - 3200 m. Production from the Austin Chalk dates to the 1920s. However, it was not until after the prolific North Sea discoveries in the early to middle 1970s that the Austin Chalk became a primary target for exploration. Although Pearsall Field in south Texas was discovered in 1936, the middle 1970s spurred further exploration, and by the late 1980s, approximately 1600 wells had produced in excess of 60 MMBO from this field. One of these wells, which gauged 18,000 BOD while drilling, is still making 600 BOD. An exciting discovery of the 1970s was the Giddings Field (Fig. 8-11), which has produced more than 185 MMBO from approximately 3,000 wells (Horstmann, 1977; Haymond, 1991). In the middle 1980s, a new approach to Austin Chalk exploration was inaugurated when Exxon completed a well in the Giddings Field from a horizontal borehole. Through 1987, fourteen horizontal wells were drilled here, resulting in an anticipated
786
L
t
O
1% %%%%%%%%%%%%'~ ~
100 km
['~
Austin Chaik outcrop G.ddnngs tie,a 9
.
ua.as I
~'~
" -.9 .... . .... ..e, ~xxxx\'~
-'-
9x x x - ~ .
'~
~.~
x,,-,,
i
,,,
!
_~
' ,
, ,
"~"~', %0
\< <;
I
c,"
|
_~'
/
oo
"~
rJ'~,.,
9
oI
,
q~
.,~'7".,:,,
f"
[!
,,..,
..t::,"- .' ." . .. / . ~ . ~ , Z . . - : . ~ G,da,n s , ,\", 9 ~ ~ l ~ ::?," 0f field San A n t o n t oJ / ~,k,,,,," :: ~,.x"x.' ." ~ ' 9 . ~ ~U " ,''. ,
..
/~
~
~<\i
~,
o ..,,,"
~'..~.~.".o'..." s
,, . . . . ,,,~tg,~}
,
..Q
9t . ~ .",
|
,,,o.,
. . . . . . . . ,,,,,,,>,- ..-" --~ . . . - " -"
/\xxx,.xxxxxv
a~\~%~.~%%%\>
-/
C_
~
) / ~
tI
-
I
oF MEX,CO
i
i Fig. 8-11. Location map illustrating Giddings Field relative to regional features: Balcones, Luling and Mexia-Talco fault zones, Austin Chalk outcrop. (From Kuich, 1990 after Corbett et al., 1987; reprinted with permission from WorldOil.) ultimate recovery of 80,000 BO per well. Thirty-four horizontal wells were completed in 1988, 56 in 1989, and 548 in 1990. At least 50 horizontal wells are completed each month. In December 1990 alone, 122 horizontal wells were permitted (Haymond, 1991). One of the companies in this play, Union Pacific Resources (UPRC), claims to be a leader in horizontal drilling in the Austin Chalk trend:
"Since late 1989, we have drilled 251 wells and currently have interests in 24 operated rigs and two non-operated rigs. This activity helps make us the leading driller in the United States today. This activity has generated 53000 BOED net to UPRC with 29000 BOD, 16000 BNGLD and 78 MMCFD. Our current leasehold in the trend totals 467000 acres and 36 MMBO reserves proven to date on these leases, with expected ultimate to be in excess o f l O0 MMBOE. Full-cycle economics generate internal rates o f return in the range o f 30-35 percent. The Chalk helped UPRC have another record year in 1991. Production was up, reserves were up andprofits were up. Look at the numbers: 66.5 MMBOE production. Up 6.17 MMBOE: $243 million earnings, up $3 million from 1990." (Adams, 1992).
787 Horizontal drilling connects multiple vertical fractures with a single wellbore, resuiting in drainage of a larger area and, hence, in higher rates of production (Fig. 812) (Snyder and Milton, 1977; Stapp, 1977; Corbett et al., 1987; Raeser and Collins, 1988; Haymond, 1991). Horizontal drilling is now the routine technique for Austin Chalk exploration and production (Chuber, 1991; Kuich, 1990). A horizontal well may recover three to five times more oil than a comparable vertical well. Before the advent of horizontal drilling, success had been claimed for seismic techniques finding fault zones and tracing them up into the fractured chalk (Fig. 8-13). Other techniques have included properly supervised fracture programs and use of circulating muds with proper properties.
Fracture trend NE-SW
~.1~ i-lorizontal well ,. " " ., ," " ~'~ ,,""" Poor production Good
i| \
.-
\
n
~
-\
,
.
m
~
Tectonic extension toward Gulf Coast Geosyncline
!!
~!~i{:
I
t
" i: Middle ~ .....
Lowor
Austin Chalk
)
Fig. 8-12. Geologic model of fracture development in the Austin Chalk. Small-scale faulting and associated fracturing trend in a NE-SW direction in response to regional tension. Fracture swarms generally do not communicate in a dip direction. Horizontal wells attempt to interconnect the hydrocarbons isolated in these fractures. (From Kuich, 1990; reprinted with permission from Worm Oil.)
Comparison to European chalk One intriguing difference between European chalks and the Austin Chalk is the color of the rocks. European chalks are as white as expressed in the famous song on the white, chalk cliffs of Dover. By comparison, the Austin Chalk (and other North American chalks, discussed below) are medium and dark gray to black (Fig. 8-14). Apparently, North American chalks are internally sourced and, accordingly, their dark colors are related to the presence of organic matter. In fact, inexperienced mud loggers and geologists often have mistakenly identified subsurface samples of the Austin Chalk as shale.
788
ECF 1-2 ."4_c113
Fig 4 B
~,
ECF 1-1
.':IRI3
a
NW
."4713
0L__
330
._ .qRt3
4,000 ft
|
I
3
]
8"370
ECF 1-1 380
"5
"3
390
92
2 4
9 91
3
m,
J
2,f
Fig. 8-13. (A) Seismic line shows typical fracture indicators: breakup of base Austin Chalk, top Austin Chalk and Pecan Gap reflectors (circled). The highly productive ECF 1-1 well is located on a base Austin Chalk indicator whereas the unsuccessful ECF 1-2 well is not. (B) Map view of seismic line relative to well locations. (From Kuich, 1990; reprinted with permission from Worm Oil.) A recent experience with an Austin Chalk core relates the following: (1) There are oil shows throughout the chalk interval (API gravity 17 - 26~ (2) The chalk ranges in color from medium gray to black. The basal part of the core is similar in appearance to the Devonian black shales of the Appalachians. (3) Primary permeability is less than 0.01 mD, and in contrast to North Sea chalk reservoirs, porosity is only 6 - 10%. (4) Fracturing is minor and the decision on whether or not productivity can be enhanced by a "frac job" is pending. In contrast, fractures are ubiquitous in the highly productive North Sea chalk reservoirs.
789
Fig. 8-14. Core of Austin Chalk (Champlin Petroleum #1 Lancier Brinkman, Burleson County, Texas). Black color results from the presence of a high concentration of organic matter. The well from which this core was taken had an initial production in excess of 400 BOPD and a large amount of gas. Width of core 15cm.
Niobrara Chalk The Niobrara Formation was deposited as a chalk in the westem interior seaway of North America during the Late Cretaceous (Fig. 8-15). Reservoirs that produce from this chalk were deposited during periods of maximum transgression when, like in the settings of the North Sea and Austin Chalk, influx of terrigenous material was at a
-: : :~, ~,
/ k
I u.-
O,~ - . . , ,
~.
Y%~':.LI,, "Oo,, ~ "~ '
~l - -
~.|."-, '/
/f 'a~
FL__I ~ BURIALLESSTHAN3000FT.
I~
'J ~-~
I
" " I
BURIAL
ooo o,ooo F T .
I,~ \ L:_:_J
COLO. /:, J.,~ /.'," _.,<'k'FG~"
_~ o
200 Mt
~"','~~, O' -"L..."
t 0
300KM
_._j--Fig. 8-15. Distribution of Niobrara Chalk in western interior seaway. (Modified from U.S. Geological Survey, Panel # G-245-D, 1980.).
790 minimum (Smagala, 1981; Brown et al., 1982; Lockridge and Pollastro, 1988). Like North Sea chalks and the Austin Chalk, the Niobrara Chalk consists almost entirely of coccolith plates (Fig. 8-16) with only subordinate planktonic foraminifera, Inoceramus fragments, and oyster shells (Scholle, i977). This chalk occurs in the subsurface of eastern Colorado and Wyoming, and is exposed in South Dakota, Nebraska and Kansas. Farther to the west, it grades into calcareous mudstones and shales. Deltaic to nearshore-marine sandy facies along the westernmost margin of the western interior seaway are correlative with the pure chalk. All of these facies and lithologies of the Niobrara are productive. The chalk is up to 200 m thick in the Denver Basin of eastern Colorado (Lockridge and Scholle, 1978; Nydegger, 1991).
Fig. 8-16. Scanning-electronmicrographof Niobrara Chalk composedentirely of coccoliths. (Modified from U.S. Geological Survey,Panel # G-245-D, 1980.) Scale bar = 10 ~tm. The color of the chalk in subsurface cores is generally dark gray to black (Fig. 817) signifying a high concentration of organic matter; in fact, cores of chalk stink like propane even after several months of storage. Hence, the Niobrara is an excellent source rock. In the central Denver Basin its total organic carbon content averages 3.2
791
Fig. 8-17. Core of Niobrara Chalk. Black color of chalk results fromthe presence of a high concentration of organic matter. (Modified from U.S. Geological Survey, Panel #G-245-D, 1980.) Length of scale approximately 20 cm. weight percent (Rice, 1984). In areas of thermal maturity, such as the Denver Basin, the chalk is highly oil saturated (Smagala et al., 1984; Nydegger, 1991). Once again, as with the North Sea and Austin chalks, fracture patterns are the key to exploration for productive reservoirs in the Niobrara. Vertical fractures, confined to brittle interbeds between plastic and impermeable shales, form the reservoirs which are trapped between the overlying Pierre and underlying Carlile shales (Fig. 8-18). Both pervasive forces, such as regional tectonic stress and the history of burial and uplift, together with local features, such as bed-stretching, bed bending, thermal expansion at bed contacts, and elastic versus ductile bed contrasts, control the fracture pattern (Longman, 1991, quoting Fred Meissner). Resistivity logs are important in mapping potentially productive areas, and a need exists for improved drilling techniques, including the use of freshwater gels to prevent formation damage in horizontal wells (Longman, 1991, quoting Charles Brown). Before the advent of horizontal drilling, some companies employed remote sensing to determine fault and fracture patterns and drilled successful wells on the hade of the intersection of such features. Even after the technological revolution of horizontal drilling, however, aerial photography and satellite imagery retain their importance. In Silo Field in Wyoming, sets of northeast- and northwest-trending lineaments may guide exploration efforts (Longman, 1991). The Niobrara Chalk and its stratigraphic correlatives have produced over 56.5 MMBO or gas equivalent through 1990. On the eastern flank of the Denver Basin, accumulations are normally on low-relief anticlinal and fault anticlinal closures. Vertical wells have been stimulated with a foam-fracturing treatment; the estimated recovery per well normally is 1 0 0 - 500 MMCFG, although a few exceptionally good wells recover more than 1,000 MMCFG. Although production from Niobrara gas
792
# ,##
0
SHARON SPRINGS
CAMPANIAN
80
EAGLE
~ E E K
SANTONIAN
85
8 co
,,.,--
----...,
...--..
-----
I . . .
CONIACIAN co
90
r,.o
=~
,,=, co
95
,~ 2
SMOKY HILL FT. HAYS Ls. SAGE BREAKS Sh. TURNER Ss.
TURONIAN
BLUE HILL Sh. FAIR PORT Sh. PFEIFER Sh.
100 Fig. 8-18. Stratigraphy of western interior seaway. (From Cobban and Reeside, 1952; reprinted with permission from the Geological Society of America.)
wells is relatively limited, the low cost of drilling and completion makes them attrac' tive exploration targets for small independent producers (Lockridge, 1983). Cumulative Niobrara production from the Denver Basin is more than 4.5 MMBOE from 36 fields. Silo field in Wyoming has been the most active field for horizontal drilling, with cumulative Niobrara production of 1.3 MMBOE from 40 wells. The production of recent horizontal wells yielded 2,000 and 1,670 BOE per day (Nydegger, 1991).
EPILOGUE
As pointed out in the preceding narrative, the European chalk is white in color, even at great depth in the subsurface. Its source rock is generally indicated to be the underlying Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay, although overlying Paleocene shales likewise have been suggested as source rocks. By contrast, even in the shallow subsurface, North American chalks are dark and, commonly, as black as Appalachian black shale. Cores of North American chalk are often mistaken for shale. The source of the black color is the high concentration of organic matter present. In as much as the organic matter is derived from the original coccolith ooze and would also have been present originally in the European chalk, an unknown process in an unknown geologic setting
793
must have removed the European chalk's original organic matter. In other words, the European chalk has undergone a diagenetic history which did not affect the North American chalk. What could that have been? One can speculate how plate tectonic movements, as part of the opening of the Atlantic Ocean, affected the European chalk. But then the writer has seen subsurface chalks from the Middle East that likewise are as white as those from Europe.
REFERENCES
Adams, W.L., 1992. Geologists need business sense.Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Explorer, April 1992: 36. Alger, P., 1991. The UK sector of the North Sea is 25 years young. Bull. Houston Geol. Society, 33, 5:16 -19. Brewster, J., Dangerfield, J. and Farrell, H.E., 1986. The geology and geophysics of the Ekofisk Field waterflood. Mar. and Petrol. Geology, 3" 1 3 9 - 169. Bromley, R.G. and Ekdale, A.A., 1987. Mass transport in European Cretaceous chalk: fabric criteria for its recognition. Sedimentology, 34: 1079- 1092. Brown, C.A., Crafton, J.W. and Golson, J.G., 1982. The Niobrara gas play: exploration and development of a low pressure, low permeability gas reservoir. J. Petrol. Technol., 24:2862 - 2870. Chuber, S. (Editor), 1991. Austin Chalk Exploration Symposium. South Texas Geol. Society, 131 pp. Cobban, W.A. and Reeside, J.B., 1952. Correlation of the Cretaceous formations of the western interior of the United States. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 63: 1011- 1044. Corbett, K.P., Friedman, M. and Spang, J., 1987. Fracture development and mechanical stratigraphy of Austin Chalk, Texas. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 71" 17 - 28. D'Heur, M., 1984. Porosity and hydrocarbon distribution in the North Sea chalk reservoirs. Mar. and Petrol. Geology, 1" 211 - 238. Ekdale, A.A. and Bromley, R.G., 1988. Diagenetic microlamination in chalk. J. Sed. Petrology, 58:857 -861. Feazel, C.T. and Farrell, H.E., 1988. Chalk from the Ekofisk area, North Sea: nannofossils + micropores = giant fields. In: A.J. Lomando and P.M. Harris (Editors), Giant Oil and Gas Fields, Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineralogists, Core Workshop, 12, 1" 155-178. Feazel, C.T. and Schatzinger, R.A., 1985. Prevention of carbonate cementation in petroleum reservoirs. In: N. Schneidermann and P.M. Harris (Editors), Carbonate Cements. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineralogists, Spec. Publ., 36" 9 7 - 106. Feazel, C.T., Keany, J. and Peterson, R.M., 1985. Cretaceous and Tertiary chalks of the Ekofisk Field area, central North Sea. In: P.O. Roehl and P.W. Choquette (Editors), Carbonate Petroleum Reservoirs. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 4 9 5 - 507. Friedman, G.M. and Sanders, J.E., 1978. Principles of Sedimentology. John Wiley & Sons, New York: 792 pp. Garrison, R.E., 1981. Diagenesis of oceanic carbonate sediments: a review of the DSDP perspective. In: J.E. Warme, R.G. Douglas and E.L. Winterer (Editors), The Deep Sea Drilling Progress: A Decade of Progress. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineralogists, Spec. Publ., 32" 181 - 2 0 7 . Hancock, J.M. and Scholle, P.A., 1975. Chalk of the North Sea. In: A.W. Woodland (Editor), Petroleum Geology and the Continental Shelf of Northwest Europe, v. 1, Geology. Applied Science Publishers, London, pp. 413 - 427. Hardman, R.F.P., 1982. Chalk reservoirs of the North Sea. Bull. Geol. Soc. Denmark, 30' 1 1 9 - 137. Haymond, D.,1991. The Austin c h a l k - a n overview. Bull. Houston Geol. Society, 33" 2 7 - 34. Horstmann, L.E., 1977. Giddings Field. In: G.K. Bums (Editor), Typical Oil and Gas Fields of Southeast Texas. Houston Geol. Society, II, pp. 2 3 5 - 241. Huxley, T.H., 1868. On a piece of chalk. British Assoc. for the Advancement of Science, Norwich, England: no pagination. Jorgensen, N.O., 1986. Geochemistry, diagenesis and nannofacies of chalk in the North Sea Central Graben. Sed. Geology, 48: 2 6 7 - 294.
794 Kennedy, W.J., 1980. Aspects of chalk sedimentation in the southern Norwegian offshore. The Sedimentation of the North Sea Reservoir Rocks, Geilo, Norwat. Norwegian Petrol. Soc. Conference, 29 pp. Kennedy, W.J., 1987. Sedimentology of Late Cretaceous-Paleocene chalk reservoirs, North Sea Central Graben. In: J. Brooks (Editor), Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe. Graham and Trotman, London, pp. 469 - 481. Kuich, N., 1990. Seismic and horizontal drilling unlock Austin Chalk. Worm Oil, 211(3): 47 - 54. Lockridge, J.P., 1983. Shallow gas fields in high porosity chalk: an independent's exploration strategy. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 67: 2156. Lockridge, J.P. and Pollastro, R.M., 1988. Shallow Upper Cretaceous Niobrara gas fields in the Eastern Denver Basin. In: S.M. Goolsby and M. Longman (Editors), Occurrence and Petrophysical Properties of Carbonate Reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain Region. Rocky Mountain Assoc. Geol. Societies, 1988 Carbonate Symposium, pp. 6 3 - 74. Lockridge, J.P. and Scholle, P.A., 1978. Niobrara Gas in eastern Colorado and northwestern Kansas. In: J.D. Pruit and P.E. Coffin (Editors), Energy Resources of the Denver Basin. Rocky Mountain Assoc. Geol. Societies, Guidebook, pp. 3 5 - 49. Longman, M., 1991. Niobrara workshop reviewed. Outcrop, 40(7): 1 4 - 15. Mimran, Y., 1977. Chalk deformation and large-scale migration of calcium carbonate. Sedimentology, 24:333 - 360. Maliva, R.G. and Dickson, J.A.D., 1992. Microfacies and diagenetic controls of porosity in Cretaceous/ Tertiary chalks, Eldfisk field, Norwegian North Sea. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 76:1825 1838. Maliva, R.G., Dickson, J.A.D. and R~iheim, A., 1991. Modelling of chalk diagenesis (Eldfisk Field, Norwegian North Sea) using whole rock and laser ablation stable isotopic data. Geol. Magazine, 128:43 - 4 9 . Morse, J.W. and Mackenzie, F.T., 1990. Geochemistry of Sedimentary Carbonates. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 707 pp. Nelson, R.A., 1981. Significance of fracture sets associated with stylolite zones. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 65: 2 4 1 7 - 2425. Nydegger, G.L., 1991. Overview of the Rocky Mountain fractured Niobrara. In: S. Chuber (Editor), Austin Chalk Exploration Symposium. South Texas Geol. Society, pp. 111 - 117. Nygaard, E., Lieberkind, K. and Frykman, P., 1983. Sedimentology and reservoir parameters of the Chalk Group in the Danish central graben. Geol. en Mijnbouw, 6 2 : 1 7 7 - 190. Raeser, D.F. and Collins, E.W., 1988. Style of faults and associated fractures in Austin Chalk, northern extension of the Balcones Fault Zone, Central Texas. Trans., Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Societies, 38: 267-276. Rice, D.D., 1984. Occurrence of indigenous biogenic gas in organic-rich, immature chalks of Late Cretaceous age, eastern Denver Basin. In: J.G. Palacas (Editor), Petroleum Geochemistry and Source-Rock Potential of Carbonate Rocks. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Studies in Geology, 18: 1 3 5 - 150. Schatzinger, R.A., Feazel, C.T. and Henry, W.E., 1985. Evidence of resedimentation in chalk from the Central Graben, North Sea. In: P.D. Crevello and P.M. Harris (Editors), Deep Water Carbonates. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineralogists, Core Workshop, 6: 3 4 2 - 385. Schlanger, S.O. and Douglas, R.G., 1974. Pelagic ooze-chalk-limestone transition and its implications for marine stratigraphy. In: K.J. Hsu and H.C. Jenkyns (Editors), Pelagic Sediments on Land and Under the Sea. Intl. Assoc. Sedimentologists, Spec. Publ., 1:117 - 148. Scholle, P.A., 1975. Application of chalk diagenetic studies to petroleum exploration problems. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 59: 2 1 9 7 - 2198. Scholle, P.A., 1977. Chalk diagenesis and its relation to petroleum exploration: oil from chalks, a modem miracle? Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 61: 9 8 2 - 1009. Smagala, T.M., 1981. The Cretaceous Niobrara play. Oil and Gas J., 79, 10:204 - 218. Smagala, T.M., Brown, C.A. and Nydegger, G.L., 1984. Log-derived indicator of thermal maturity, Niobrara Formation, Denver Basin, Colorado, Nebraska, Wyoming. In: J. Woodward, F.F. Meissner and J.L. Clayton (Editors), Hydrocarbon Source Rocks of the Greater Rocky Mountain Region. Rocky Mountain Assoc. Geol. Societies, Guidebook, pp. 355 - 363. Snyder, R.H. and Craft, M., 1977. Evaluation of Austin and Buda formation cores and fracture analysis. Trans., Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Societies, 27: 3 7 6 - 385. Stapp, W.L., 1977. The geology of the fractured Austin and Buda formations in the subsurface of South Texas. Trans., Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Societies, 27:208 - 229.
795
Van den Bark, E. and Thomas, O.D., 1980. Ekofisk: first of the giant oil fields in Western Europe. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade: 1 9 6 8 - 1978. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 3 0 : 1 9 5 - 224. Watts, N.L., 1983. Microfractures in chalks of Albuskjell Field, Norwegian Sector, North Sea: possible origin and distribution. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 67:201 - 234. Watts, N.L., Lapre, J.F., Van Schijndel-Goester, F.S. and Ford, A., 1980. Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary chalks of the Albuskjell area, North Sea: deposition in a base-of-slope environment. Geology, 8: 2 1 7 - 2 2 1 . Ziegler, P.A., 1975. Geologic evolution of the North Sea and its tectonic framework. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 59:1073 - 1097. Ziegler, P.A., 1982. Geological Atlas of Western and Central Europe. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 130 pp.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
797
Chapter 9 HYDROCARBON RESERVOIRS IN KARSTED CARBONATE ROCKS S.J. MAZZULLO AND G.V. CHILINGARIAN
INTRODUCTION
Hydrocarbon reservoirs in which substantial porosity and permeability have resuited from karstification of carbonate rocks, or where trap configurations and some secondary porosity in preexisting porous carbonates are related to karstification, are common in many petroliferous basins in the world. The formation of most such karst reservoirs commonly is ascribed to extensive dissolution of carbonate rocks beneath and along subaerial unconformities. Additionally, reservoirs also are associated with various paleogeomorphologic (paleolandscape) features in weathered carbonate terrains. These processes, and the products of karstification, are generally, although not exclusively, indicative of prolonged periods of subaerial meteoric exposure along unconformities. In fact, upwards of 30% of recoverable hydrocarbons in Precambrian and Phanerozoic age reservoirs (both siliciclastic and carbonate) are intimately related to unconformities (Moody et al., 1970), and this percentage probably is greater for hydrocarbon reservoirs in carbonate rocks that have been affected by weathering along unconformities (Esteban, 1991). Although not discussed in this chapter, karsted carbonates also are host to many other economically valuable mineral deposits throughout the world. Karst associated with lead and zinc, copper, fluorite, antimony, mercury, vanadium, uranium, bauxites, ores of nickel, iron and manganese, phosphorites and phosphates, clays, coal, and of course, potable water are discussed in Kyle (1983), Sangster (1988), Bardossy (1989), Bardossy et al. (1989), Bocker and Vizy (1989), Bosak (1989a), Bourrouilh-Le Jan (1989), Dzulynski and Sass-Gustkiewick (1989), Ford and Williams (1989), Fuchs (1989) and Zotl (1989). This chapter reviews some basic geologic aspects of unconformity-related hydrocarbon reservoirs in karsted carbonate rocks. In particular, it concerns their global occurrence, contribution to global oil and gas reserves, subsurface recognition, and reservoir petrophysics. Readers interested in general aspects of karst formation in carbonate rocks should consult the works of Thrailkill (1968) Jennings (1971), Bogli (1980), James and Choquette (1984, 1988), Palmer (1984), Ford andWilliams (1989), and Wright et al. (1991), and the many references contained therein. Papers in Bosak et al. (1989a) provide excellent examples ofkarsts of different ages from around the world. Compilations that deal specifically with karsted hydrocarbon reservoirs include James and Choquette (1988), Esteban (1991), Johnson (1991), Wright et al. (1991), and Candelaria and Reed (1992).
798 KARSTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPTO UNCONFORMITIES
Karst origins Karst features of both surficial meteoric dissolution and precipitation origin within and transecting carbonate strata (vugs, caves, caverns, enlarged fractures, joints, and faults; flowstones, dripstones, and associated cements), and of geomorphic origin developed on weathered carbonate landscapes (dolines, residual hills, dissolution valleys), constitute the most common type ofkarst recognized in modem and ancient settings. That is, karst formed at and below unconformity surfaces of subaerial exposure (Fig. 91: James and Choquette, 1984; Choquette and James, 1988). Such karst typically is characterized as distinctive terranes whose landforms, hydrology, and diagenetic facies result from dissolution, mainly by carbonic acid (Smart and Whitaker, 1991). According to Esteban (1991, p. 96), karst is "... the product ofsubaerial exposure in carbonates consisting of an integrated drainage system including conduit flow. The drainage system is formed by dissolution and mechanical erosion of carbonates by meteoric w a t e r s . . , enhancing preexisting permeability networks (fractures, bedding planes, primary porosity and secondary porosity).", and " . . . with well-developed secondary porosity." (Ford and Williams, 1989, p. 1). Perhaps a more inclusive definition is that of Esteban and Klappa (1983), paraphrased as "a diagenetic facies, an overprint on subaerially exposed carbonates, produced and controlled by dissolution, and migration and precipitation of calcium carbonate in meteoric waters, occurring in a wide variety of climatic and tectonic settings and generating a recognizable landscape". This type ofkarst occurs throughout the stratigraphic record (e.g., Mussman and Read, 1986; Sando, 1988; Bosak, 1989b; Palmer and Palmer, 1989; papers in Bosak et al., 1989a), and despite the fact that not all aspects of karstification as defined above are always readily apparent in the subsurface, it has strongly affected the formation of most subunconformity-trap hydrocarbon reservoirs around the world. Tower
...~/~ D o l i n e
Soil
--&'e~'viaiion-'i...__ Zone of percolation~
| ] ~ 11
11_/
\\ Vadose
I I~.,.~ ~~-I[-zon~
b
} ~
~K~ ' ~ f }
_Caves
J_
,b"/'-/////////////z4 [ |
/
Calcrete
/ Mixed-water zone (brackish)
o.0 (saline) ur,,.oo.
\
/ --
~
~
~
~
-
Fig. 9-1. General elements ofkarst. (From Choquette and James, 1988; reprinted with permission from Springer-Verlag.)
799
Other types ofkarst-forming systems are known to occur in nature, some of which do not involve meteoric waters (for a general review see papers in Bosak et al., 1989a; Ford and Williams, 1989; Wright, 1991). Their relative contributions to the development of hydrocarbon reservoirs, however, appear to be vastly subordinate to reservoirs associated with subunconformity, subaerial and surficial meteoric karsts. The following six other types ofkarst systems are recognized: (1) Karst dissolution of emergent and shallow buried carbonate rocks by mixed meteoric-marine groundwaters in modem coastal settings (Back et al., 1979, 1986; Hanshaw and Back, 1980; Stoessell et al., 1989). Some hydrocarbon reservoirs are known to occur in this type of subunconformity-related karst. For example, reservoir porosity formation in Amposta Marino Field in offshore Spain was polygenetic in that this type of subunconformity-related karst overprinted a preexisting meteoric karst system (Garcia-Sineriz et al., 1980; Wigley et al., 1988; Bouvier et al., 1990). (2) Karst porosity in the submarine environment resulting from reflux of evolved meteoric waters through rocks buried under submerged continental shelves (Stoessell et al., 1989; Fanning et al., 1981). Hydrocarbon reservoirs are not presently known from such settings. Although such systems are not in direct contact with subaerial unconformities, it must be remembered that karstification may extend hundreds of meters or more below unconformity surfaces (Choquette and James, 1988). Hence meteoric, as well as mixed meteoric-marine fluids as discussed in (1) above, may result in extensive karstification of carbonate rocks in the subsurface (Fig. 9-1), whether the strata are on land (e.g., Vemon, 1969) or under the sea (Fanning et al., 1981; Stoessell et al., 1989). (3) Likewise, megascopic karst dissolution features (i.e., caverns) also are known to form as a result of interaction of carbonates and ascending hydrothermal fluids, wherein dissolution either overprints a preexisting subaerial karst system or which itself generates the bulk of the porosity (Dublyansky, 1980; Egemeier, 1981; Bakalowicz et al., 1987; Muller, 1989). Such karsts may be associated with subaerial unconformities in that fluids expelled from depth cause extensive near-surface dissolution. Reservoir examples of this type of karst also are not presently known. This type of karst commonly is related to "intrastratal karst", which forms by subsurface dissolution along lithologic boundaries, the products of which can be confused for surface karst (Choquette and James, 1988; Bosak et al., 1989b). (4) Extensive modem and older karst cavern systems, such as Carlsbad Caverns, New Mexico, many caves in Romania, and possibly some large oil fields around the world (e.g., Yates and Dollarhide fields, Permian Basin, Texas; Agha Jari, Kirkuk, Asmari, Rumaila, and Zubair fields in the Middle East; Renqiu Field in China) may represent "sulfuric acid oil-field karsts" (Han, 1990; Hill, 1990, 1992). Carbonate dissolution in this type ofkarst system occurs in the burial environment, as rocks are being uplifted, or in those rocks already telogenetically exposed. Dissolution is caused by ascending evolved connate fluids that are enriched in sulfuric acid as a consequence of oxidation of HzS in evaporite-rich, hydrocarbon environments and/or by mixing of waters of different H2S content (Hill, 1990, 1992; Palmer, 1991). These karsts likewise may not be associated with subaerial unconformities, particularly if they have formed in the deep burial (mesogenetic) environment. In fact, mesogenetic dissolution of carbonate rocks by evolving burial fluids of various chemistry is known to have caused
800
extensive secondary porosity development in many hydrocarbon reservoirs, and may locally result in the formation of intrastratal, karst-like unconformities in this environment (Mazzullo and Harris, 1992). Possible criteria for the recognition and distinction of meteoric subaerial, hydrothermal, and oil-field karsts are given by Bakalowicz et al. (1987), Ford and Williams (1989), Hill (1991, 1992), Palmer (1991), and Smart and Whitaker (1991). (5) Cold seawater-dissolution of extant carbonate platforms may also result in the formation of some karst-like cavities in carbonate rocks (Smart and Whitaker, 1991). (6) Collapse and brecciation of carbonate strata as a result of intrastratal dissolution of evaporites (not considered in this chapter because it's not related to subunconformity, meteoric processes: refer to several papers in Bosak et al., 1989a, specifically, Palmer and Palmer, 1989; and DeMille et al., 1964, and Smith and Pullen, 1967). The fact is that karst formation can be, and commonly is, "polycyclic" (sensu Ford and Williams, 1989) in that a specific cycle of karstification is overprinted by one or more successive cycles, each possibly having been related to different processes as discussed above: that is, they can be polycyclic as well as polygenetic. The Amposta Marino Field in Spain is an example of polycyclic and polygenetic karst, and likely, many other examples exist in karsted carbonate reservoirs (for example, Yates and Dollarhide fields in the Permian Basin of Texas: Hill, 1990, 1992; Sailer et al., 1991). In fact, with few exceptions (Garcia-Sineriz et al., 1980; Wigley et al., 1988; Bouvier et al., 1990; Han, 1990; Hill, 1990, 1992) most studies ofkarsted carbonate reservoirs have tacitly assumed that the karsted unit under consideration formed as a result of subaerial meteoric exposure. Unfortunately, the subsurface recognition of other types of karsts is a difficult task in reservoirs because of the common paucity of definitive regional information accompanying most oil-field studies that is required for their identification. Hence, virtually by default, the main topic of concern in this chapter is karsted carbonate reservoirs that have actually, or are assumed to have, formed as a result of subaerial meteoric exposure along unconformities. This constraint appears to be justified, however, because according to Ford and Williams (1989), the majority of studied occurrences of karsts are, in fact, of subaerial meteoric origin. Karsts and causative mechanisms of subaerial exposure
The most common types of karsts, those of subaerial meteoric origin, form as a result ofwholescale dissolution of carbonates. A major consideration in studies of this type ofkarst is the causative mechanism for subaerial exposure.As discussed below, it has been demonstrated or at least tacitly assumed in many studies that karstification in the stratigraphic record resulted from subaerial exposure due to sea level drops: either relative drops caused by situations in which rates of sedimentation exceeded subsidence, or resulting from local tectonic uplift; or of global scale due to eustatic falls (e.g., Vail et al., 1977). A special situation of karsting occurs in large, intracratonic basins associated with thick evaporites, wherein eustatic and or relative sea level lowstands are not necessarily indicated. This mechanism, referred to as "evaporative drawdown", involves periodic desiccation ofintracratonic basins and concurrent deposition ofevaporites. Carbonates
801
deposited during previous sea level highstand cycles become emergent and can be subject to karst dissolution. Such a mechanism apparently resulted in karstification of some Silurian reefs in the Michigan Basin and some Devonian reefs in the Alberta and Williston basins of Canada (Fuller and Porter, 1969; Jodry, 1969; Wardlaw and Reinson, 1971; Mesolella et al., 1974; Gill, 1985). Only the examples described by Mesolella et al. (1974) and Gill (1985) are included in later compilations of karsted reservoirs, however, because either there is no hydrocarbon production associated with the affected carbonates or karsting was not specifically mentioned in these other quoted references to have significantly contributed to reservoir porosity and permeability. For purposes of simplicity, specific causative mechanisms of subaerial exposure will not be considered in ensuing discussions. Instead, reference will be made only to local or global, eustatic or relative sea levels drops attending karstification.
Relationships to unconformities Controls on karstification The most common style of karstification (Fig. 9-1) occurs when carbonate strata are exposed to meteoric fluids along and beneath unconformities that represent periods of subaerial exposure. Several intrinsic and extrinsic factors affect karstification (Table 9-I). According to Ford (1988), Ford and Williams (1989) and others, karstification is promoted in wet climates and when the affected carbonate strata are moderately thick bedded, relatively impermeable, and with widely spaced joints. In
TABLE 9-I Factors that influence the development ofkarst terranes EXTRINSIC Climate
Rainfall and evaporation Temperature
Base level
Elevation and relief Sea level or local water bodies
Vegetation Time duration INTRINSIC Lithology
Mineralogy Bulk purity Fabric and texture Bedding thickness Stratal permeability Fractures
Structure and stratigraphy
Attitude of strata Confined or unconfined aquifers Structural conduits
Source: From James and Choquette, 1988; reprinted with permission from Springer-Verlag.
802
the absence of these conditions, subaerial exposure along unconformities will not always lead to karstification. Hence, not all subunconformity carbonate reservoirs can be considered to be karsted. In fact, there are many examples in the stratigraphic record of carbonate rocks that have been subaerially exposed, and which have developed secondary dissolution porosity, but which do not necessarily qualify as karst by the definitions given earlier (e.g., Zelten Field in Libya: Bebout and Pendexter, 1975; Seminole Southeast Field, Permian Basin, Texas: Mazzullo, 1985; Mississippian fields on the Sweetgrass Arch in Montana: Pasternack, 1988; and others in Roehl and Choquette, 1985, and the fields listed in encl. 3.1 in Esteban, 1991). At best, such examples may represent only incipient karsts because there clearly is a gradation in nature between meteoric diagenesis that causes cementation and only minor dissolution, and meteoric diagenesis that resuits in extensive karstification. Every effort was made to exclude non-karst examples from the compilations of karsted carbonate reservoirs that are presented later in this chapter, particularly when no mention ofkarst was indicated in original published references. In addition to climatic and geologic controls, the duration and timing ofsubaerial exposure exert strong influence on the style of karstification that will be produced along unconformities. In this regard, the type of unconformity present above a carbonate sequence is relevant to studies ofkarsted carbonate reservoirs. Esteban (1991) presented a definitive summary of unconformity types and their relationships to karstification and hydrocarbon reservoirs in karsted carbonate rocks (Fig. 9-2).
Caribbean style karst According to Esteban (1991), fifth-order conformities, represented by bedding plane contacts with perhaps as much as 0.001 million years time gap between beds, typically are not associated with karst features. In contrast, fourth-order disconformities commonly cap upward-shoaling, carbonate depositional cycles within the larger-scale depositional sequences of Vail et al. (1977). These disconformities typically represent up to 0.01 million years time gap, and generally do not imply exposure due to global or local sea level fall. Such disconformities often are referred to as "intraformational unconformities". Meteoric diagenesis along such boundaries is considered to be essentially syndepositional ("eogenetic" of Choquette and Pray, 1970) and relatively shortlived, and usually involves alteration of only a limited thickness of mineralogically unstable (for example, aragonitic and high-magnesium calcite composition in Pleistocene and Holocene deposits), unlithified to weakly lithified carbonate sediments. This style of early diagenetic alteration is referred to by Esteban (1991) as "Caribbean type karst" (Table 9-11). As discussed below, however, the use of this term is misleading and, in fact, may be erroneous. There simply is not enough time in most cases for dissolution attending shortlived subaerial exposure along parasequence boundaries to create true karsts. In fact, dissolution in such cases most commonly results in the development of secondary fabric-selective porosity (for example, by dissolution of aragonitic particles) superimposed on an existing depositional porosity system of primary interparticle and intraparticle pores in newly deposited sediments. In most cases, megascopic karst features such as caves, cavem systems, and relict dissolutional landforms do not develop. Instead, reservoir petrophysical properties show a marked control by
803 ,,,
STRATIGRAPHIC DISCONTINUITIES
ORDER
el
1,
TIME GAP SCALE My
Cltroiic~.,,Iri,!
200
ERATIIEM
>60
SYSTEM
,,
,
,
,
CORRESPONDING STRAT. UNIT
My
_
E. UNCONFORMITY ~
~ o o
SERIES
S.U. SET O c9
SUPERUNCONFORMITY
, ~ ~ (-~ Z
i i
i
REGIONAL UNCONFORMITIES [sequence boundaries} TYPE I TYPE 2 SYNTECTONIC UNCONFORMITY B O U N D A R Y
MEGASEQUENCE
200 400
Z
MEGA-
O F
SIIOALING CYCLES
STAGE
4-12
9
o
3-4
.
SUPERSEQUENCE
10-100
(synthem}
mesothem
BIOZONE
DEPOSITIONAL SEQUENCE
Variable
ROTATIONAL s y n t e c t o n l c ONLAP-OFFI.AP ct!m. wedge
P 0 . 0 I- I
SUPERSEQUENCE SET (sequence of Sloss}
.
0.01
PARASEQUENCE
I- I 0
cyclothem 0.2-0.5
Not BEDDING PLANE
recognizable 0.001
BED
O. 01
Fig. 9-2. Types of unconformities associatedwith karst. (FromEsteban, 1991"reprintedwith permission from Post-graduate Research Institute for Sedimentology.) depositional facies and lithologies (wherein secondary porosity formation is, in essence,
facies-selective: Mazzullo, 1986) rather than being controlled by karst features. Hence, reservoirs formed in such situations can not be considered as being karst-altered. Representative hydrocarbon reservoirs of this type include Zelten and Seminole Southeast fields (references cited above), several fields in Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous carbonates in the Neuquen Basin in Argentina (Mitchum and Uliana, 1985), and fields listed in encl. 3.1 in Esteban (1991). In other cases, subaerial exposure along parasequence boundaries has also resulted in the formation of incipient karst surfaces known as "depositional paleokarsts" (Choquette and James, 1988) or"diagenetic terranes" (Roehl, 1967). Such incipient karsts generally are limited to single, relatively thin layers in a stratal sequence (although there may be vertical stacking of such units, discussed below), and the affected strata lack the megascopic, well-developed drainage patterns and dissolution features characteristic of more mature karsts. Such depositional paleokarsts occur in many carbonate hydrocarbon reservoirs (e.g., fields listed in encl. 3.1 in Esteban, 1991), and these commonly are associated with relatively thin, laterally discontinuous units of carbonate dissolution-collapse breccia (such as those which result from the dissolution of evaporites and/or carbonates), small caves, and associated primary and secondary porosity. Likewise, the extent to which such incipient karstification has significantly affected reservoir porosity and permeability systems in these cases varies. For example, relatively high porosities (as much as 12%) and permeabilities (as much as 169 millidarcys)
804
TABLE 9-11 Subaerial diagenesis involving"Caribbean Model" versus "General Model" ofkarstification CARIBBEANMODEL 1. Short exposure time 2. Unstable carbonate mineralogy 3. Shallowburial 4. Minor tectonics 5. Minor deep phreatic zone 6. Primaryand fabric-selective pore types dominate 7. Only in tropical to semi-arid environments 8. Diffuse recharge-diffuse flow only 9. Affected by marine mixing zone 10. Absence ofhydrothermal mixing GENERALMODEL 1. Longer exposure time 2. Stable mineralogy(calcite, dolomite) 3. Deep burial 4. One or several tectonic events 5. Important deep phreatic zone 6. Secondary and fracture porosities predominate 7. Widerrange of environments 8. Confluent recharge, pipe, and confined flow 9. Absence of marine mixing zone effects 10. Presence ofhydrothermal mixing
Source: From Esteban, 1991" reprinted with the permission of Postgraduate Research Institute for Sedimentology and the author. occur in Puckett Field (Ordovician) in the Permian Basin ofTexas (Loucks andAnderson, 1985) partly, but not entirely, as the result of periodic, but short-lived, early subaerial exposure and attendant dissolution. Although small karst caves and associated breccias contribute to the overall reservoir porosity and permeability systems here, reservoir petrophysical properties remain strongly controlled by depositional facies, pre-exposure diagenetic facies (e.g., syndepositional dolomitization and associated porosity), depositionally-controlled diagenetic facies created during the subaerial meteoric exposure event (sensu Mazzullo, 1986), and to the presence of fractures. In contrast, despite early brecciation and attendant dissolution, such a style ofkarstification ultimately contributed little or nothing to the reservoir petrophysical system in, for example, Cabin Creek Field (Ordovician) in the Williston Basin (Roehl, 1985). Individual porous and productive karstic units in fields associated with unconformities along parasequence boundaries typically are thin. However, depositional stacking of such units and interbedded porous but not karsted beds, due to repeated transgression and regression, locally may result in the accumulation of thick gross pay sections. Likewise, successive episodes of short-lived subaerial exposure may cumulatively enhance previously-formed dissolutional pore systems throughout the affected section.Although thick, however, such sections typically compose vertically compartmentalized reservoirs unless the gross pay section is transected by a system of pervasive fractures (e.g., see Loucks and Anderson, 1985).
805
Field examples wherein meteoric alteration along parasequence boundaries did not result in any karsting, or where although formed, depositional paleokarsts did not contribute to reservoir porosity and permeability systems as per the original published references, are not included in later compilations ofkarsted carbonate reservoirs. General karst model Single unconformities of regional extent represent the third-order stratigraphic discontinuities (Fig. 9-2) of Esteban (1991), and as defined, are coincident with depositional sequence boundaries of Vail et al. (1977). Exposure in such cases normally results from global, eustatic sea level drops, although tectonic uplift rather than eustasy may result in local, relative sea level drops. Time gaps represented by these boundaries are on the order of 1.0 million years. According to Esteban (1991), only minor karsting usually occurs along depositional sequence boundaries, although major karst surfaces are known in a few cases (for example, Yates Field, Permian, in the Permian Basin of Texas: Craig et al., 1986 and Craig, 1988 [although this field may be an example of the sulfuric acid oil-field karsts of Hill, 1990, 1992]; and some Devonian reef fields in Canada). Such unconformities and associated hydrocarbon reservoirs generally are not associated with extensively structured (i.e., complexly folded or faulted) strata. In at least the upper portion of affected strata, where essentially newly-deposited carbonate sediments are exposed, diagenesis will be of"Caribbean style" as described above. In contrast, composite unconformities represent first-order and second-order stratigraphic discontinuities of Esteban (1991 ), with durations of exposure being from 4 million to 200 million years (Fig. 9-2). Exposure in such cases is due in large part to global, eustatic sea level drop, although regional tectonic uplift also cannot be ruled out. According to Esteban (1991), major karst systems of regional scale form along composite unconformity surfaces (the "interregional paleokarsts" of Choquette and James, 1988), which commonly affect tectonically deformed strata as well as regionally low-dipping strata. Most karsts associated with single and composite unconformities developed as a result of the meteoric dissolution of already mineralogically stabilized rocks (limestones and dolomites) during successive cycles of uplift after burial. Hence, dissolution generally is not fabric selective, rather than being strongly controlled by the presence of unstable (readily soluble) mineralogies in newly-deposited carbonate sediments (i.e., fabric-selective) as in Caribbean style karsts. This style of karstification, referred to by Esteban (1991) as the "general model" (Table 9-11) and which would be included as "telogenetic" in the Choquette and Pray (1970) classification, and associated karsted hydrocarbon reservoirs are very common in the stratigraphic record, discussed below. In contrast to reservoirs associated with early karsting along parasequence boundaries, the petrophysical characteristics of hydrocarbon reservoirs formed along most composite unconformities and some single unconformities (e.g., Yates Field) are strongly controlled by the presence of vertically and laterally extensive, not fabric-selective karst porosity such as caves, cavems, and dissolution-enlarged fractures and faults. These pore systems can extend hundreds of meters below unconformity surfaces, particularly in karsts associated with composite unconformities.
806
Additional karst definitions Numerous definitions ofkarsts in terms of relationship to timing of formation exist in the literature (e.g., Choquette and James, 1988; Bosak et al., 1989a; Ford and Williams, 1989), some of which have been presented in preceding discussions. The definitions of Choquette and James (1988) are followed throughout this paper. According to these authors, the general term "karst" includes those forming at the present time as well as "paleokarsts", a term that refers to ancient karsts that were buried by younger sediments or rocks. Two specific types ofpaleokarsts are recognized: (1) relictpaleokarsts, which are once-buried, ancient karst landscapes or features that subsequently have been exhumed by erosion so as to be components of present-day landscapes; and (2) buried paleokarsts, which are ancient karst landscapes or features that remain buried beneath younger sediments or rocks. Examples ofkarsted hydrocarbon reservoirs discussed in this chapter necessarily refer to buried paleokarsts; throughout this chapter they will simply be referred to as paleokarsts.
CLASSIFICATION OF KARST RESERVOIRS
Previous classifications Hydrocarbon reservoirs in karsted carbonate rocks occur in one of several trapping configurations, which collectively, are grouped into the general category of subunconformity paleogeomorphic traps (Fig. 9-3) as defined in the trap classification schemes of Levorsen (1936, 1967), Martin (1966), Chenowith (1972), Halbouty (1972), and Rittenhouse (1972). These authors did not propose specific classifications ofkarsted carbonate reservoirs. Implicit, although not necessarily implied in these classifications, however, are the "buried hill" traps (Fig. 9-3) which are but one specific example wherein reservoir porosity and permeability may have been created or enhanced as a result of meteoric karst dissolution. Guangming and Quanheng (1982) proposed a classification of fault-associated, buried hill traps from their studies in China. Martin (1966) specifically mentioned karsted carbonate reservoirs in his example of "indirect, leached reservoirs" located beneath unconformities. A classification scheme specific for karsted carbonate reservoirs was proposed by Esteban (1991) wherein five types of paleokarst reservoirs (Fig. 9-4) are related to structure and the unconformity types discussed in the preceding section. Type 5 paleokarst reservoirs are represented by fiat-lying to gently-structured strata in which upwardshoaling cycles and/or stacked carbonate mounds or buildups are associated with fourthorder disconformities along parasequence boundaries. These may grade to type 2b reservoirs wherein multiple, convergent unconformities are present within the productive section (Fig. 9-4). Karsted reservoir types 1 through 3 represent single and composite unconformities associated with broad arches, remnant depositional and erosional highs, and linear trends of folds and faults. Type 4 reservoirs are, in reality, supraunconformity traps associated with buffed karst topography. In essence, Esteban's (1991) reservoir types 2, 3, and 4 also may include examples of "buried hills" as described by Martin (1966), Halbouty (1972), and Rittenhouse (1972).
sa.tomosoa 9 posso:tdxo ,qleo!qde~odolooled ao ,qle:mloruls -uou (17) pue 'sllnej ao soamoeaj jo spuo:U :mout.i ql!ax pole!oosse Sa!OAaOSO:t(E) 'Sa!OA -:tOS0a possoadxo ,qle:mloruls (Z;) 'stI!q po!anq u! s:t!omosoa (I) :oae popnlou ! oae sodA1 HOAOS0S0ql qo!qax olu! Meal lsae~I jo so!ao~oleo u!etu anoj oq• "uo!lettuoj a!OA.X0S0a pue uo!leoU!lsat;~I jo ~u.ttu!l pue 'sa!oAaoSOa jo suo!leoo I 'so!l!maojuooun ol eleals poloojje jo oamoruls o!~OlOO~jo solnq!:Ille olqeddem OlelO:tqo!qax 'sodLl-qns 113.IOAOS pue ( I I A - I) sod,(1 :I!OAa0S0a ied!ou!ad U0AOS sopnlou ! uo!leotl.tSSelO luosoad oqs "(1661) ueqols~[ pue '(686I) upls,~L'(6861) on,~noqs '(e6861) ~IOZelO '(686I) sopao)I pue ,~ssopae~I '(g861) uosI!A~ '(0861) ue~t.qz '(9L6 I) ,(plSlOS,~k ,(q saoded 'saoqlo ~uotue opnIou ! 'sooanos olq!ssoooe s lou ao/pue o~en~uel-U~!OaoJ u! aeodde leql osoqJ, pue 'Sa!OA.t0S0a oleuoqaeo polsae~I ol soouoaojoa ieaouo~ aoqlo "OA!SnlOu!tuo:t2 aeotst. uo!lel!dtuoo Llolst.q oseo s!qs "(Ill-6 olqes PIaoAr oql punoae tuoa2 so~e sno!aeA jo Sa!OA.lOSOaoleuoq:mo polsae~I 2o suo!ld!aosop poqst.iqnd jo AXO!AOae UO poseq S! 1I "(aoldeqo s!ql jo uo.uoos ~ut.poooad e u! poq.uosop sod,(1 lsae~I oql ol pae~oa ql!ax) pottuoj OAeq ,(etU slsae~I oql Axoq uo!leaop!suoo olu! o~Iel lou soop uo!leo~!ssei o oqs "s:t!omoso:t oleuoqaeo pols:te~I jo sluotuZlZ ieamoruls pue o!~OlOO~ ied.tou!ad oql oz!aoloeaeqo ol ls.tuo!lel!oldxo pue ls!uo!leaoldxo 0ql aoj zpt.n~ e se popuolu! s! 11 "Sa!OA.iOSO:tpols:te~IJO SlUOtUOIOO!~OIO0~ ooejansqns Ie!luosso sole:~olu! (g-6 "~!::I) aoldeqo s!ql u! posodoad Sa!OA:tOSOa01euoq -aeo polsae~I 2o uo!leoO!SSelO oql 'oansodxo Ie!~oeqns ao2 stus!ueqootu OA!lesneo oql ao '(166 [ 'ueqols~) sod,(1 ,(l!ttuo2uooun jo uo!leog!luop! uo ,q!Ae0q ~U!,q0a ueql aoqle~t
saldutvxa puv uo!lvo~SSVlOpasodoad ('sls!~oloo D tunoloalo d jo uo!le!oossv ueo!.xotuV oql tuoaj uo!ss!ttuod ql!ax polu!ad -oa '.EL61 ',(lnoqleH tuoaa) "Meal II!q po!anq ol lu!od saxo~e '.Meal Ll!ttuojuoounqns jo sods "r "~!d
dVH& 31HdElOINO3903"lVdQ dVEI1 A.LIIN~IO3NO3Nn(~ dVEll 31HdVEIglIVEllS 0 ~
j
.."
9
---...__ . . . . . . . ~
-_-
-_--
--,---_._
_._.._.
__ ----.__
- - . . _ . .._.__~
-..-,..--
/.,08
._..__._
808
STYLES OF UNCONFORMITY RESERVOIRS AND ASSOCIATED PALEOKARST .
BLANKETS OVER BROAD ARCHES
Seal
Reservoir
a. D e p o s t t i o n a l - e r o s t o n a l
.
M O S A I C S OF REMNANT HIGHS
b. S t a c k s of c o n v e r g e n t unconformities .
LINEAR T R E N D S a. F a u l t
b. A
n
t
l
c
L
t
n
~
c. D e p o s l t l o n a l - e r o s l o n a l .
W E D G E S AND MANTLES ABOVE UNCONFORMITY
.
a. L a y e r - c a k e
LAYERS OF SHALLO~AqNG CYCLES
b. L a y e r - m o u n d
Fig. 9-4. Esteban's (1991) classification of subunconformity, karsted carbonate reservoirs. (From Esteban, 1991" reprinted with permission from Postgraduate Research Institute for Sedimentology.)
809
BURIED HILL T R A P S TYPE I
- ON HORIZONTAL
TO G E N T L Y - D I P p I N G
STRATA
T Y P E II - EROOED REEFS/MOUNDS
TYPE
III - KARST EROSION ISOLATES PREEXISTING POROSITY
TYPE
IV
-
IN STRUCTURED STRATA
CAN ALSO aE SVNFORMAL WITHIN CONFINES OF rile HILL
C i
~
~
OIP$ CAN AtLSO 8~ ANrlFORMAL OR SlFNFORMA[
STRUCTURAL~-EXPRESSED EXHUMED OLDER UNCONFORMITY
TYPE V
VCONFORMI II1~$
CAN At $0 IlIF $YNFO~qMAL WITHIN CONFINES Of rife IIILL
CAN 8E ANtlFORMAL. SYNFOR~At. ErC
A S S O C I A T E D WITH L I N E A R F R A C T U R E / F A U L T
TRENDS
T Y P E Vl
NON-STRUCTURALLY
OR P A L E O T O P O G R A P H I C A L L Y
EXPRESSED
T Y P E Vii
Fig. 9-5. Proposed classification of traps in karsted carbonate reservoirs.
oo
TABLE 9-III Examples of hydrocarbon reservoirs in karsted carbonate rocks ~ Field/trend
Location
Reservoir age (unit)
Field type 2
Reservoir lithology
Reference(s)
Various fields
Waverly Arch (Ohio)
U. Cambrian
IB
Dolomite
Dolly and Busch (1972)
Kraft-Prusa Trend (Kansas)
Central Kansas Uplift (Arbuckle Group)
Cambrian-L. Ordovician
I A,B
Dolomite Waiters (1946, 1958); Waiters and Price (1948); Newell et al. (1987)
Cottonwood Creek, Healdton, Oklahoma Wilburton fields (and others)
Anadarko and Arkoma Basins (Oklahoma)
Cambrian-L. Ordovician, (Arbuckle Group)
IV B; V A
Dolomite
Gatewood (1970); Latham (1970); Wilson ( 1980a,b; 1985); Shirley (1988); Hook (1990); Bliefnick and Belfield (1991); Carpenter and Evans (1991); Lynch andA1-Shaieb (1991); Waddell et al. (1991); Wilson et al. (1991, 1992); Bliefnick (1992)
Various fields (e.g., Renqiu)
North China-Bohay Bay Cambriatr-M. Ordovician I B; IV A-C Basins (China) Precambrian (various units)
Dolomite, limestone
Guangming and Quanheng (1982); Li et al. (1982); Qi and Xie-Pei (1984); Quanheng (1984)
Various fields
Permian Basin (Texas)
L. Ordovician (Ellenburger Group)
IB;IVB,C; V A,B; VII
Dolomite
Mear and Dufurrena (1984); Loucks and Anderson (1985); Mazzullo and Reid (1986); Ijirigho and Schreiber (1988); Kerans (1988, 1989, 1991); Amthor and Friedman (1989); S.J. Mazzullo (1989a, b: 1990); Mear (1989a); Verseput (1989); Holtz and Kerans (1992); Kupecz (1992); Loucks and Handford (1992)
Various fields (e.g., New Hope, Fairview, Maben)
Appalachian Region, Black Warrior Basin (Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee)
L.-M. Ordovician (Knox Group)
IVB
Dolomite, limestone
Fritz (1991 ); Henderson and Knox (1991); Raymond and Osborne (199 l)
Various fields
Michigan Basin (Michigan)
L.-M. Ordovician (Prairie du Chien Group)
I A,B
Dolomite
Nadon and Smith (1992)
Lima Indiana and Albion-Scipio-Pulaski trends; Northville, Stoney Point, Trenton fields
Cincinnati and Findley Arches (Ohio, Indiana)
U. Ordovician (Trenton Fm., Black River Fm./Group)
VI
Dolomite
Wilson (1980 a,b; 1985); DaHaas and Jones (1988); Catacosinos et al. (1990)
Dollarhide Field
Central Basin Platform (Permian Basin, Texas)
L. Ordovician-Devonian (Ellenburger Group, Fusselman Fm., Thirtyone Fm.)
Various fields
Midland Basin and Central Basin Platform (Permian Basin, Texas and New Mexico)
L.-M. Silurian (Fusselman and Wristen Fms.)
I B; IV A--C
V A,B
Dolomite
Stormont (1949)
Dolomite; some limestone and locally tripolitic chert
Mear and Dufurrena (1984); Garfield and Longman (1989); Geesaman and Scott (1989); L.J. Mazzullo (1989; 1990 a,b); S.J. Mazzullo (1989b); Mear (1989b); Canter et al. (1992); Entzminger and Loucks (1992); Mazzullo and Mazzullo (1992); Troschinetz (1992 a,b)
Dolomite
Mesolella et al. (1974); Gill (1985)
No. and So. Michigan Michigan Basin Basin Pinnacle Reef (Michigan) Trend (e.g., Belle River Hills, Rapid River fields)
M. Silurian (Niagara Group)
Various fields (e.g., Marine Pool, ColmerPlymouth, Edinburg West)
Illinois Basin and Sangamon Arch (Illinois)
Silurian (Niagaran, some associated Devonian)
II; IV B
Dolomite, limestone
Lowenstam (1948); Whiting and Stevenson (1965); Kruger (1992)
Star, Lacey, West Campbell, NE Alden fields
Anadarko Basin (Oklahoma)
Silurian-Devonian (Hunton Group)
I B; III
Dolomite
Harvey ( 1972); Withrow ( 1972); Carpenter and Evans (1991)
Various fields
Permian Basin (Texas, New Mexico)
L.-U. Devonian
IB; IV A,B; V A,B
Dolomite, Hovorka and Ruppel ( 1990); Sailer et al. ( 1991); Canter et al. (1992) local limestone and tripolitic chert
Grant Canyon Field
Basin and Range (USA)
Devonian (Simonson and Guilmette Fms.)
IVC
Dolomite
Read and Zogg (1988)
Bindley Field
Central Kansas Uplift (Kansas)
L. Mississippian
Dolomite
Ebanks et al. (1977)
Big Horn Basin (Wyoming)
U. Mississippian (Madison Fm.)
Dolomite, some limestone
McCaleb and Wayhan (1969); McCaleb (1988)
Elk Basin Field (and others)
(Thirtyone Fm.)
(Warsaw Fm.) IB
oo
TABLE 9-III (Contd.) Reservoir age (unit)
Field type 2
Reservoir lithology
Alida, Daly, Newburg, Williston Basin Nottingham, Parkman, (Canada and USA) South Westhope, Virden fields (and others)
U. Mississippian (Mission Canyon and Madison Groups)
I B; III;
IVA
Limestone, dolomite
Edie (1958); Martin (1964, 1966); Illing et al. (1967); Marafi (1972);Wilson (1985); Kent etal. (1988)
Carter Creek and Whitney Canyon fields
Wyoming Overthrust Belt
U. Mississippian
IVB
Dolomite
Harris et al. (1988); Sieverding and Harris (1991)
Various fields
Central Kansas Uplift (Kansas)
Mississippian (Miss. Lime and "Chat")
IB
Limestone, Wilson (1980 a,b) chert residuum
Crossfield, Harmatton East, Harmattan Elkton, Sundre, Westward Ho fields
Alberta Basin (Canada)
Mississippian (Elkton Fm.)
IB;IVA
Limestone
Martin (1964, 1966)
Various fields (including those on Horseshoe Atoll)
Midland Basin (Permian Basin, Texas)
M.-U. Pennsylvanian (Strawn, Canyon, Cisco Fms.)
I A,B; II
Limestone, some dolomite
Vest (1970); Reid and Mazzullo (1988); Reid et al. ( ! 990, 1991); Reid and Reid ( 1991)
Central Basin Platform Yates and Taylor Link West fields (and others) (Permian Basin, Texas)
U. Permian (San Andres Fm.)
IA,B
Dolomite
Craig et al. (1986); Kerans and Parsley (1986); Craig (1988)
Various fields (including Ishimbay)
Ural Foredeep (U.S.S.R.)
Permian (various units)
Limestone
Maslov (1945); Maksimovich and Bykov (1978)
Malzen, Schonkirchen, Reyersdorf fields
Vienna Basin (Austria)
U. Triassic
IVA
Dolomite
Ladwein (1988)
Nagylengyel Field
Hungary
Triassic, some Cretaceous
1V
Limestone, dolomite
Balint and Pach (1984)
Casablanca Field (and others)
Tarragona Basin (Spain)
U. Jurassic
IVC
Limestone, some dolomite
Garcia-Sineriz et al. (1980); Watson (1982); Esteban ( 199 l)
Un-named
Bresse Basin (France)
Jurassic
VB
Limestone
Fontaine et al. (1987)
Field/trend
Location
Reference(s)
(Madison Group)
Amposta Marino Field (and others)
Tarragona Basin (Spain)
L. Cretaceous (Montsia Fm.)
IB
Limestone
Garcia-Sineriz et al. ( 1980); Wigley et al. (1988); Bouvier et al. (1990)
Field "A"
Mediterranean Basin
L. Cretaceous
IVC
Limestone
Fontaine et al. (1987)
Stuart City Trend
San Marcos Arch and Texas Gulf Coast (USA)
L. Cretaceous (Edwards Fm.)
IB;II; IVB
Dolomite, limestone
Rose (1972); Bebout and Loucks ( 1974); Wilson (1980a,b; 1985)
North Field
Qatar (Persian Gulf)
L.-M. Cretaceous (MishrifFm.)
IVB
Limestone
Aves and Tappmeyer (1985)
Golden Lane Trend
Tampico Embayment (Mexico)
M. Cretaceous (El Abra Fm.)
I A,B; II
Limestone
Viniegra and Castillo-Tejero (1970); Coogan et al. (1972)
Campeche-Reforma Trend
Mexico
L.-U. Cretaceous, U. Jurassic locally
IVB;V
Dolomite, some limestone
Santiago-Acevedo (1980)
BuHasa, Fahud, Fateh, and Natih fields
Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (Persian Gulf area)
Cretaceous (Wasia Group)
II; IV C
Limestone
Tschopp ( 1967); Twombley and Scott ( 1975); Wilson (1980) a,b; 1985); Harris and Frost (1984); Jordan et al. ( 1985); Videtich et al. (1988)
Rospo Mare Field
Italy
Cretaceous
?IA
Limestone
Dussert et al. (1988)
Intisar "D"
Sirte Basin (Libya)
Paleocene (Intisar Fm.)
Limestone
Brady et al. (1980)
Kirkuk Field
Iraq
Eocene-Oligocene (Fars Fm.)
II; IV B
Limestone, dolomite
Daniel (1954)
Bombay High Field
India
Miocene
II; IV A; V: VI
Limestone
Rao and Talukdar (1980)
South Alamyshik Field
U.S.S.R.
Paleogene
IVA
Limestone
Khutorov (1958)
All examples are in subunconformity reservoirs. 2 See Figure 9-5.
OO
814
Reservoirs in buried hills Review of available published literature (Table 9-111) indicates that the most common occurrence of hydrocarbon reservoirs in karsted carbonates is as buried hills, which compose reservoir types I through IV of the present classification scheme. Implicit in the recognition of this type ofkarsted reservoirs are the following: (1) that karst dissolution has created or significantly enhanced preexisting reservoir porosity and permeability; and (2) that the geomorphic development of now-buried landforms is largely, but not necessarily entirely, attributed to karst erosion.Accordingly, the following types and examples of reservoirs in karsted buried hills are recognized, with additional examples and specific references listed in Table 9-1II: Type I - Karst erosion of regional horizontal to gently-dipping strata, which leads to the geomorphic development of residual hills (including "karst towers" of Choquette and James, 1988: Fig. 9-1) with megascale karst dissolution porosity. The residual hills compose the reservoir and trap beneath impermeable sealing beds. One of the betterknown examples of this type of reservoir are fields in Arbuckle (Cambrian to Ordovician) dolomites in the Kraft-Prusa Trend of central Kansas. Here, reservoirs occur mostly in karsted carbonates of buried hills and along the truncated edges of dissolution valleys at the top of the Arbuckle (Fig. 9-6). Other notable examples are: (1) fields in karsted Cambrian dolomites on the Waverly Arch in Ohio (Fig. 9-7); (2) fields in karsted Ordovician dolomites in the Permian Basin of Texas (Fig. 9-8); and (3) Yates Field (Permian dolomites) in the Permian Basin. Type I I - Karst erosional (geomorphic) modification of, and development of megascale dissolution within, depositional topographic features such as massive bedded reefs and organic mounds, which likewise, compose the reservoir and trap beneath sealing beds. Notable examples are the fields in karsted reefs of Silurian age in the Michigan Basin (Fig. 9-9), the giant Golden Lane (Cretaceous) Trend in Mexico (Fig. 9-10), and the Pennsylvanian HorseshoeAtoll in the Permian Basin, Texas (Fig. 9-11). In reality, many such field reservoirs clearly are hybrid traps, that is, combinations of at least two disparate trap types. For example, although both the Golden Lane and Horseshoe Atoll trends (Figs. 9-10 and 9-11) at least partly represent karst-modified reefs, individual fields within these trends also reflect production from buried hills that are not entirely coincident with actual reefal accumulations. Type I I I - This type represents a special category of buried hill reservoirs in which, although karst erosion has resulted in the geomorphic development of residual hills in gently-dipping strata, the reservoir had a preexisting porosity-permeability system that was not appreciably enhanced by karst dissolution. Rather, the lateral isolation of lenses of porous carbonate rocks within adjoining hills, which subsequently were overlain by impermeable strata, define the essential trap configuration of producing fields (Fig. 9-5). Notable examples of this type of trap are some of the productive fields in Silurian to Devonian carbonates (Hunton Group) in the Anadarko Basin in Oklahoma, and in Mississippian carbonates (Mission Canyon and Madison Groups) in the Williston Basin in Canada and the United States (Fig. 9-12). Specific references to these types of traps include Edie (1958), Illing et al. (1967), McCaleb and Wayhan (1969), Harvey (1972), Withrow (1972), and McCaleb (1988). Unconformities associated with buried hill reservoir types I, II, and III typically are
NW
B L O O M E R FIELD.
K R A F T - P R U S A FIELD 9
9
$3
9
S4
9
SS
9
St
O
S?
9
$8
it
ill
ill
lO
el
9
9
IZ
9
03
9
04
9
IS
9
IO
9
61
el
9
9
el
9
TO ~ l
9
9
9
9
9
9
71
73
74
Ti
ll
TI
fO
II
9
9
~
~
9
~t
lO
II
I1
83
9
9
SE
9
04 I S le 01 .................................. ;Jill
il II Ii ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I,,;:1.,,.""~'-I I
I
I
!........
......
.
~
_
~ - - ~ ~ - ~ -
9
"
" .
SW
,
"
.
~
~ .
.
.
,,,,,,, .
.
.
,
~
"
.
~~;__,,:
N , . . . , . . . , . - - . - ; _-_.,..-....._...., - .
. " .c~.~.B...o.-.9..~.ov!c~
'
~
~...~ x
....
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
9
9
9
.o'
/it
9
9
9
9
E2 I ~
~4
lOS
106
lOT
104
B L O O M E R FIELD 9
9
9
J
t~
l)-
04
Is
- ..... ' ~ . ~
"-:::~:
9
9
DO I 1
fur
9
9
IT
iS
gO
~
"
~
]
tOO ~
i
"
' ':~
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . r~-- ' ~ ' ~ i ~ L/
. . . . . . . . ~
,
"
,
......
.
.
.
.
.
9 ~t
NE
9
o.
IlO
Ill
i
................................................................................... "-UII
'...............................................................................................
.
~
.
S T O L T E N B E R G FIELD
..'.::I:...............
. ...............
"
.
,
,
.
~
.
.... - 9- ~ ~ I ~
.
"~
"~iff.~~'"t "
P ~ E
-
C A
M B
R
I A
-...~.~.:-~,;:..........-...;...:.........~ ""~'-'='.'.:.'.".'" :.'.""'.
N
," '~", .
I- i- i-i I.,,,
.
.
~
....
,
. . . . .
,,
:
0
,
:
I
,,
. . . . . : :'-. - . . . . . . . . '-~t'..~~: . - . . ..'.. i
.
.
;.
;.
:... Illl
J
t
Fig. 9-6. Cross sections illustrating Type I reservoirs associated with buried hills and edges of dissolution-valleys in karstedArbuckle (Ordovician) dolomites on the Central Kansas Uplift. (From Waiters, 1946; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
OO L/I
816
A
17 E
R21W
r ,% , \
(
i
\
'
ISOPACHED I N T E R V A L SHADED
\le
Ir 17 T
>----ORA,NAOE ' A ' E R , , CON+OUR INTERVAL- '0"
~N
o
,io
2.0 -,LES !
Fig. 9-7. (A) Buried hill paleotopography in karsted sub-Knox carbonates, WaverlyArch, Ohio, shown by isopach map of overlying Lower and Middle Chazy rocks; (B). Portion of Fig. 7A illustrating relationship between hydrocarbon production and buried hills as shown by Knox unconformity subcrop map. (From Dolly and Busch, 1972; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
817
B
!
I~~ ~ i~~ ~1
. ol ,
\
,
.
I
p.~
z
!
"~\
TIT N
6'
"~'
o o
0~ 36
'~"0 0
0
0
i,,.-
o
D-E
CONTACT BETWEEN ZONES O ANO E
E-P
CONTACT .ETWEe,~
!~
00
MI00LE CHAZY DOLOMITE ZONE
6~ '
9
r:,
9
w
.
/
,
9
!
"
~: ~
~]
>9 r
R
lllW
~
,:7
~L__
818
9
%
oo
9
"
-.. ~
. .. ~ .
k'x
.. ~.__~.t~
. r
, ..........
1
k,k
3-'- .................
.
.
.
.
.
Fig. 9-8. Buried hill paleotopography (structure, top ofEllenburger, CI = 25 feet) and Type I reservoirs in Ellenburger (Ordovician) dolomites in a portion of Borden County, Permian Basin, Texas. Black dots refer to wells that currently produce or which have produced from the Ellenburger. (Modified from Mazzullo and Reid, 1986.)
single unconformities which occur along sequence boundaries, although some composite u n c o n f o r m i t i e s also may be represented (i.e., the third-and s e c o n d - o r d e r unconformities, respectively, of Esteban, 1991). Excluding Type III reservoirs, karst dissolution and reservoir porosity-permeability systems in these buried hill reservoirs formed d u r i n g s u b a e r i a l e x p o s u r e a n d a r e c o i n c i d e n t w i t h the geomorphic development of the geomorphic landscapes.
819
i MODEL NO. 3 FOR REEF DEVELOPMENT i
i ii
[STAGE i] Development of coral pinnacle during Niogaran J ........ time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hieh ~_* _tEV~L 1 I . . . . . . . . . . . . leverol tens of feet
1
NIAGARA INTERREEF
ii
NIAGARA INTERREEF
_
[STAGE2] Cessation of reef development during Salina A-I
Evoporite
deposition.
,,,~-'~~possible
exposure
Low SEA LEVEL
CORALS A-I EVAPORITE
A-1 EVAPORITE CRINOIDS NIAGARA INTERREEF
I I
_ ._._.~~
[STAGE 3] Rejuvenation of reef development during Salina A-1 Carbonate deposition. H i c k SEA LEVEL
A-I CARBONATE
A-I CARBONATE
A-! EVAPORITE
A-I EVAPORITE
/ ~N I AGARA INTERREEF
I
NIAGARA INTERREEF
NIAGARA INTERREEF
[STAGE 4| Cessation of reef development during Saline Low SEA LEVEL A-2 Evaporite deposition. A-2 EVAPORITE
"
A - I CARBONATE
9 111 Z
0 .
,
r,~ ~
" " ~ LAMINAR STROMS. ENCRUSTING '~
c
'ALGAE 7
,~-Z~.7~~,..,~
A-2 EVAPORITE
~,
A-I
A-1 EVAPORITE NIAGARA INTE RREEF
SEA LEVEL HISTORY Low High
CARBONATE
A-I EVAPORITE ~
~
CRINOIDS
~ " ~
~
NIAGARA INTERREEF
Fig. 9-9. Sequential stages in the development of Type II buried hill reservoirs in karsted Silurian pinnacle reefs in the Michigan Basin. Location of typical pay zone indicated in diagram of stage 4. (Modified from Mesolella et al., 1974; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
820
GoJden Lane Trend
.N.~
e~.~
L UPPER
CRETACEOUS
- MIOCENE
STRATA
8 km Fig. 9-10. Northeast-to-southeast cross section through Golden Lane Trend in Mexico illustrating karst topography developed on Middle Cretaceous El Abra Limestone, which includes production from reservoirs in Type I and Type II buried hills. (Modified from Viniegra and Castillo-Tejero, 1970.)
Type I V - Buried hills in structured strata are represented by karst-modified cuestas or hogbacks (some of which may be the limbs of breached antiforms or synforms), breached antiforms, and horst blocks (Fig. 9-5). Fields in such geologic settings commonly have been classified as structural traps. In this type of carbonate reservoir, however, the geomorphic formation of residual hills is largely the result ofkarst erosion of structural features rather than solely reflecting structural form. In the simplest case, formation of residual hill landscapes occurs during the last period of subaerial exposure subsequent to structuring. However, such traps alternatively may represent older buffed hills, formed during a previous cycle of karst weathering, which later have been deformed structurally, and perhaps, erosionally modified during a subsequent karst erosional cycle prior to final burial and onlap by impermeable strata. Such traps clearly are polycyclic in terms of origin. In these types of reservoirs, megascale karst dissolution beneath unconformities is, by definition, the primary process responsible for reservoir porosity and permeability. Likewise, however, karst dissolution and reservoir formation can also be polycyclic. That is, because composite unconformities (first- and second-order types of Esteban, 1991) are the most common unconformities associated with these types ofkarsted reservoirs, it follows that several episodes of karst dissolution and attendant reservoir porosity-permeability formation usually are indicated: for example, when karst dissolution along the youngest unconformity enhances porosity in previously-formed paleokarst facies. Several periods of karsting may also enhance depositional paleokarsts associated with disconformities along parasequence boundaries (in these as well as other karst types). In many cases, one can not easily differentiate the separate cycles of karstification in subsurface occurrences. In any event, however, reservoirs in this type ofkarsted carbonate commonly directly underlie associated unconformities (Fig. 9-5), although porous and productive zones may extends hundreds of meters below the unconformity. Notable examples of these types of traps are Renqiu and associated fields (pay in Precambrian to Ordovician carbonates) in China and South Alamyshik (Paleogene) Field in the former Soviet Union (Fig. 9-13), fields in mostly Cretaceous dolomites in the Campeche-Reforma Trend in Mexico, and fields in complexly thrust-faulted areas such as in the Wyoming Overthrust Belt (Whitney Canyon and Carter Creek Fields: Mississippian) and the Triassic of the Vienna Basin, Austria (Fig. 9-14).
821
TOP OF HORSESHOE REEF COMPLEX SCURRY-COGDELL
FIELD
BORDEN- SCURRY- KENT WEST C- I
TEXAS 91000
O |
(.I,. Vllll,,~r - I g l l
AREA
COUNTIES
l
3 l
!
M,le~
A
i
LEGEND .&~
U-
APPROXIMATE O I L - W A T E R CONTACT OF MAJOR FIELDS
. f"-~ L~ ~"
EFFECTIVE L I M I T S REEF PRODUCTION
OF
._2
"OGDELL J FIELD
!
I
r
/
F' l(
r ' s t o n d O r d of ' t e | e | , , ~ ) No l B r o w n " 2 " /
9
Dows
/ SCURR Y F/EL D KEL L Y - SN YDER 8 DIAMOND M PORT,IC~NIS
TO WL E )
SNYDER
~
~
_j
- $N YDER S.E. ~ E.
"--0 ~ s .
YON~oroe~ -
~" . .
.
~ . .
5
0
0
0 SCURRY
-t"-
-
J
/ ~
"o-_x.
CO
~
I
Fig. 9-11. Structure map on top of Pennsylvanian limestones in a portion of the Horseshoe Atoll Trend, Permian Basin, Texas, illustrating karst paleotopography and production from Type I and Type II buried hills. (FromVest, 1970; reprinted with permission from theAmericanAssociation of Petroleum Geologists.)
822
A
~
9
..~,.:~ ~ ....
~ ~
,
~,
~-~
~ ~ ~ : i
~,
"
-
,I \.
,. I ---..
..
.:.',%,
",~_.~
~..~
~I
,
~
'
/
,~~
"i~o,,, '--'~+j~''~ ......
~-~,
~,,
:
9 9
.
'
~
~
: .... >~ #,.-:
,~
9~<.i~
......
~~
h j
,.t~..
I~ ~
~
:,i!~:. ....!
4;~
~
"<\.
I~
~ "
~
ff~L
.:... "
c~ - ' J ~
,.,..e
~..
I
"
-,.>
.... ,._A.
"
i
.Li
"
tSOPACH .~A~ OF: L:~,W~,R Wt~TRO~I$ ":~EO BEDS"
B
...,
-
It. t ~ o m l ~ l t r dolomi!a bqtdor & Ixnm.pl, Ill # o t o I t l , ~
.:"',,
.2:2.
f,. lxompll wl i l t | i ~ l t t
>.
t
,d .'
'. ~
o'
Fig. 9-12. Type III buried hills. (A) Isopach map of strata overlying karsted Mississippian carbonates, showing production (in gray) from buried hills in a portion of the Williston Basin, Canada. (From Martin, 1966; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.). (B) Erosional development of Type III reservoirs in dolomite with preexisting porosity, an example from the Anadarko Basin, Oklahoma. (From Harvey, 1972; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
823
A NW
SE
O-N .. ---------E
~ E
~ E
k---
fo
- - - , / - - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
Z
~> . . ~ ,
- ms
. . .~.~-.-.-.-.-.-.~2~ . . -.--~~.-
~~
~
~--
~
B I
O --
A
o Ob O o e- I O Z L_ I) bL.
Boktrii
~
.
I ~
- '_ _
"
-
--."
-- ~I."_" - L ' ~ -_. ~ - ~ - _ ' ~ - - _ ' I ~ _ - - - _ ' . ~ ' ~ :
~ ~ 0
c~oo
. ; - ~Oo o. ~ o.o ~ ~ . - - _ o ~" " --. ~?
~
9
Sealevel (Reconstructed)
Poleog e ne
~ ' ~ w ~~~ f ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ Upper
- .'" " ~
:
~ "
..... .i(..i:);"... " . ..... ::.- . . . .
~~ ""
~ , .".. . ~ .. . . . . . . . . .
I
~ " " ' ~ .:...
~" r"
CretLowe r C r e t o c e o ~ s L , ~ / ( R e c o n s t r u c t e d
:: ~2
~
0
L
,
'
:.~.~..
~.~-~;;:~'~"" 5000
i
- .'
....;i:.
,X ":i. ,~ ,~
'
'
FT.
(RECONSTRUCT(D)
J
Fig. 9-13. Type IV buried hill reservoirs in structured strata. (A) Development of Renqiu Field, China. Key: Q-N = Quaternary to Neogene, E - Paleogene, Ek = Eocene, Cm-O 2- Cambrian to Middle Ordovician, Zn = late Precambrian. (From Qi and Xie-Pei, 1984; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.). (B) Cross-section through South Alamyshik Field, former U.S.S.R. (From Martin, 1966; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
824
SE
NW I-
B -
;0
1=,1 I=,
o {-, m
/L
:ll O
^
A B"
, U
,,
P'-A'
-i L
N
'N
,U
,
-0-
L IA N
.-,ooo
i
1,
~ ,
o.__~,
.-
!
~.'7--~.. ,
B
K
1000
\
9 "(;As
"."
i
,
,
i
A
i
A
R
--
i
--. .-
r
JIIPO
,,
~
\
e ~.
~
\ ', t. "' \'I \
, !I
- - LDO0
\
\ \ \
\
\ .\
\
. - 5000
\ \
\
:: 9 ,\
O
.-LO00
4
O
" O
LEGEND:
"'P~OB
4
VIENNA BASIN ~ - ]
NEOGENE
BASIN
I
FILL
FLYSCH
L 1 c~=~,,c=ou~ ~,,,.c^R,.oo~ ^,.Ps r-r-'lrl
PALEOCENE
!o~176 ,,.P=,, c , , ~ ^ ~ = o u ~
LOWER
~
~,,~
TRIASSIC
0 t
.....
_
I |
2kin -
J
Fig. 9-14. Type IV buried hill trap associated with complex thrusted strata, Matzen-Schonkirchen-Reyersdorf Field, Vienna Basin, Austria. (From Ladwein, 1988; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
825
Combination traps in structured buried hills are also common, for example, where such buried hills are partly or entirely coincident with reef mounds (Marine Pool field, Silurian, Michigan Basin; Stuart City Trend, Cretaceous, Texas Gulf Coast; and the giant Bu Hasa, Fahud, Fateh, and Natih fields, Cretaceous, in the Middle East). Erosional relief developed on productive buried hills varies from 50 ft (15 m) or less (Waiters, 1946; Edie, 1958; Vest, 1970; Dolly and Busch, 1972; Mazzullo and Reid, 1986; Reid and Mazzullo, 1988; Reid and Reid, 1991) to as much as 820 ft (250 m) in the Golden Lane Trend in Mexico (Coogan et al., 1972). Structural enhancement of erosional relief in the Renqiu Field in China has resulted in a buried hill height of 5900 ft (1800 m: Guangming and Quanheng, 1982). Structurally expressed reservoirs This type of trap (Type V) is the most complex, polycyclic type recognized. As shown in Fig. 9-15, it is characterized by tectonically deformed strata wherein the initial formation of karsted reservoirs occurred along a second-order or third-order unconformity; or more likely, as a result of karsting along a third-order unconformity, followed by renewed deposition, and then another period of karsting along a secondorder unconformity. In either case, the main karsted reservoir zone (usually paleocaverns) is located at some distance below the associated unconformity (unless exhumed by later deep erosion), and is overlain by non-productive or poorlyproductive strata within the same stratigraphic formation or group. This relationship arises either because a second cycle of karstification did not result in the formation of significant porosity, or such porosity subsequently was occluded; or because a single cycle of karsting only affected strata well below the actual unconformity surface. Following was deposition of successive strata, possibly concurrent with ongoing tectonic deformation, and in tum, the entire section is further tectonically deformed and then breached by a second-order or first-order unconformity, and perhaps, also later restructured. Accordingly, reservoir formation in this type of trap is considered to have been related mainly to karstification along the oldest unconformity, although such a relationship can be misleading (in fact, karsted horizons can form at significant distances below unconformity surfaces in all types of karst reservoirs, and their true temporal relationships to specific unconformities can easily go unrecognized). In this type of trap, although formation of karsted reservoir horizons conceivably may have been coincident with development of residual hills along the oldest unconformity, there is no definitive evidence that the trap actually has a component of buried hill topography. Rather, it is mainly of structural configuration (usually with paleocavem reservoirs), despite the fact that there may be buried hill topography along the youngest unconformity which has accentuated tectonic relief on the breached structure (Fig. 9-5). Any erosional topography along that unconformity, however, may not have any relationship to reservoir occurrence. Topographically flat paleokarst surfaces that have been tectonically uplifted into horst blocks are also included in this trap type (Fig. 9-5). Admittedly, in some cases it may be difficult to distinguish this type of trap from other types of traps. In fact, this trap type actually may inherently be of hybrid nature in terms of the timing of main reservoir porosity formation. For example, if karstification and geomorphic development of residual
826
|
! -'
I
i
-~:'-.
i
1
--'
9 I
|
!
I I
A
i
i
|
Fig. 9-15. Sequential model for the development of structurally expressed, Type V karsted reservoirs where the productive zone is not directly associated with, and occurs at a level well below, the youngest unconformity. Deposition of marine strata (1), followed by emergence and karstification along a second or third-order unconformity (2). Renewed carbonate deposition (3), followed by a second period of emergence wherein possible karsting along a second-order unconformity may not have affected the older karst system (4). Structuring may occur during stage 4 and/or stage 5.
hills also occurred along the youngest unconformity, then such a trap would be classified as a structured buried hill (Type IV) if it could be demonstrated that reservoir porosity was formed, or preexisting karst reservoir porosity was enhanced, at this time. Conversely, if only karstification and reservoir formation occurred at this time without the development of residual hills, then the trap is considered to be a type V structurallyexpressed karst reservoir. Likewise, exhumation of porosity in a preexisting but nonporous karst system would be considered either a type IV structured buried hill trap or a type V structurally expressed reservoir depending on whether or not depositional topography was present.
827
! BR. AMER. FUSON
STRUCTURAl, 2 PHILLIPS
C.S.O.
lEGgIER
C.S.O. <> WEST
I
--4000
WIERNIER-FARLEY COMPOSITE
LOG
EIGHT12.9
I
CROSS SECTION 4 S 6 C.S.O. I.T.I.O.
TROSPIER FARLEY. w PARK r OKLAHOMA 9 CITY
A 7 JO H N S O N RiENO UNIT 9COMPOSITE
LOG
EAST --MILES
Kms
"---~ [ ~ 4 o o o -
--4500
~
- 6000
V_
-6000Z
& GILL
PROSPERITY ACRES
-
k-~~--,soo.~_ z
"
6ooo-~-
< I u
6soo-<_-
--6600,~
u
O
E
ooo-
O
--7000.1-
-
Lo_I-
--7600PRE-PENNSYLVANIAN
CROSS
SECTION
Fig. 9-16. Cross section through Oklahoma City Field, Oklahoma, an example of a Type V karst trap. Note unconformity at the top of the Arbuckle (arrow, bottom left) and at the top of the Ordovician. Arbuckle pay (not shown) is 200 - 250 ft (61 - 76 m) below the unconformity at the top of the Arbuckle. (From Gatewood, 1970; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
Notable examples of this type of trap (specifically, type VA), perhaps with some porosity formed in connection with younger unconformities, are: (1) Heal&on Field and the giant Oklahoma City Field in the Anadarko Basin of Oklahoma (Fig. 9-16), both of which produce from Ordovician dolomites; (2) numerous Ellenburger (Ordovician dolomite) fields in the Permian Basin of Texas (type VB); and (3) various fields in Silurian and Devonian carbonates in the Permian Basin.
Reservoirs associated with linear, subregional trends of fractures or faults This type of trap (Type VI) includes reservoirs associated with karst dissolutionenlarged, subregional fault or fracture trends that transect subunconformity strata (Fig. 9-5). The best-known examples of this type of trap are the Albion-Scipio-Pulaski and Lima-Indiana trends (Ordovician) on the Cincinnati and Findlay Arches (southern Michigan Basin) in Ohio and Indiana (Fig. 9-17).
828
0
6 ml
0
10 km
Fig. 9-17. Structure map (CI = 40 ft) on top of Trenton Limestone inAlbion-Scipio-Stoney Point field area, Michigan Basin, showing occurrence of non-structurally expressed reservoirs (Type VI) related to karstification along sub-regional fracture/fault trend. (From Catacosinos et al., 1990; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
Non-structurally and non-paleotopographically expressed reservoirs This type of trap (Type VII) is the most subtle, karst-related subunconformity (truncation) trap recognized. It occurs in regionally gently-dipping strata beneath unconformities, where karsted reservoir zones transect bedding, or less commonly, are contained within individual strata (Fig. 9-5). Examples of this type of trap occur in some Ellenburger (Ordovician) fields in the Permian Basin of Texas (Fig. 9-18).
HYDROCARBONS PRODUCED FROM KARSTED CARBONATE RESERVOIRS
Volumes of hydrocarbons stored in and/or produced from karsted carbonate reservoirs are as varied as from any other type of reservoir. Data in Table 9-IV show that combined producible field reserves can be as low as 7.0 MMBO (million barrels of oil)
SE University 53 Field
NW
I IRION COUNTY
I SCHLEICHER COUNTY
PAY
I
Irion 163 Field
~-
Block 56 Field
U
n
c
'
~LLENB
~
U P'G~'R
~
~
GP,oUP
"
"~/~~"'-/~"7~'~-'~o~e
' ~
300 ft
J
(91
m)
2.0 reties
(3.2 kin)
Fig. 9-18. Cross section illustrating occurrence of subtle, Type VII reservoirs in karsted (cavernous) Ellenburger (Ordovician) dolomites in the Permian Basin, Texas.
c~ l,,J
oo ta4
Table 9-IV Reserve data for selected fields in karsted carbonates (from Table 9-Ili). Key: ~Proved reserves; 2estimated original oil-in-place; 3ultimate recovery. Asterisks denote associated production from weathered cherts. Field/Trend
Location
Discovery
Reservoir
Cumulative
Reserves
References
Albion-Scipio-Pulaski
Michigan Basin
1957 (earliest)
Ordovician
123 MMBO 212 TCFG
200 MMBO 3
Catacosinos et al. (1990)
Alida, Nottingham, Parkman fields
Williston Basin
1954 (earliest)
Mississippian
>31.7 MMBO
>41 MMBO 3
Illing et al. (1967); Kent et al. (1988)
Amposta Marino, Casablanca, Tarraco, Dorado, Montanazo fields
Tarragona Basin Spain
1970's
Jurassic, Cretaceous
Up to 270 MMBO 3
Watson (1982); Bouvier et al. (1990); Esteban (1992)
Belle River Mills Field
Michigan Basin
1961
Silurian
21.4 BCFG
0
Gi11(1985)
Bindley Field
Central Kansas Uplift
1972
Mississippian
983 MBO
Brahaney Northwest, West Garrett, Buckwheat, Corrigan East, Crittendon, Dollarhide*, Midland Farms*, Patricia, Wells, Tex-Hamon, Seminole fields
Permian Basin
1945 (earliest)
Siluriarv-Devonian
115 MMBO 19.1 BCFG
>90 MMBO 3
Mear and Dufurrena (1984); Mazzullo et al. (1989); L.J. Mazzullo (1990b); Saller et al. (1991); Troschinetz (1992a,b)
Campeche-Reforma Trend
Mexico
1972
Cretaceous-Jurassic
945 MMBO 698.5 TCFG
15.3 MMBO 1
Santiago-Acevedo (1980)
Elk Basin, Newburg, South Westhope fields
Williston Basin
1946 (earliest)
Mississippian
145 MMBO
213.6 MMBO 3
McCaleb and Wayhan (1969); Marafi (1972); McCaleb (1988)
Ellenburger fields (149 of the largest)
Permian Basin
1939 (earliest)
Ordovician
1.4 MMMBO
3.7 MMMBO 2(a)
Holtz and Kerans (1992)
Fateh Field
United Arab Emirates
1966
Cretaceous
398 MMBO
1.02 MMMBO 3
Jordan et al. (1985)
Golden Lane Trend
Mexico
1908
Cretaceous
1.42 MMMBO
182.5
Viniegra and Castillo-Tejero
Ebanks et al. (1977)
MMMBO2(b)
(1970); Coogan et al. (1972); Enos (1977)
Grant Canyon Field
Basin and Range (USA)
1983
Devonian
7.48 MMBO
Healdton, Oklahoma City fields
Anadarko Basin
1928 (earliest)
Ordovician
19.3 MMBO 70 BCFG
>75.5 MMBO 2(e)
Gatewood (1970); Latham (1970)
Horsehoe Atoll Trend
Permian Basin
1948
Pennsylvanian
>529 MMBO
2.54 MMMBO2(,j)
Vest (1970)
lntisar "D" Field
Sirte Basin, Libya
1%7
Paleocene
812 MMBO
1.0 MMMBO 3
Brady et al. (1980)
Kincaid, Mt. Aburn, Colmar-Plymouth, Edinburgh West fields
Illinois Basin
Silurian, some Devonian
18 MMBO
Whiting and Stevenson (1965)
Krafl-Prusa Trend; ChaseSilica, Hall-Gurney, Trapp fields
Central Kansas Uplift (and adjoining areas)
1929 (earliest)
Ordovician
1.4 MMMBO
Waiters (1946); Newell et al. (1987)
Maben and New Hope fields
Black Warrior Basin
1953 (earliest)
Ordovician
7.8 MBO 850 MCFG
Henderson and Knox (1991); Raymond and Osborne (1991)
Rospo Mare Field
Italy
1975
Cretaceous
4.5 MMBO
25.4 MMBO 3
Dussert et al. (1988)
Star, West Campbell fields
Anadarko Basin
1958 (earliest)
Silurian-Devonian
4.6 MMBO 50.6 BCFG
7.0 MMBO 3 110 BCFG3
Harvey (1972); Withrow (1972)
Taylor Link West Field
Permian Basin
1929
Permian
15 MMBO
Kerans and Parsley (1986)
Yates Field
Permian Basin
1926
Permian
1.07 MMMBO
Craig et al. (1986)
TOTAL: 8.45 MMMBO 911 TCFG M = thousands of barrels MM = millions of barrels MMM = billions of barrels BCFG = billions cubic feet of gas TCFG = trillions cubic feet of gas
Read and Zogg (1988)
TOTAL: 111.0 MMMBO (~)
aproducible remaining reserves using a 40% recovery efficiency (Kerans and Parsley, 1986) bproducible remaining reserves using a 60% recovery efficiency (Coogan et al., 1972) CProducible remaining reserves using a 24% recovery efficiency (Gatewood, 1970) dproducible remaining reserves using a 52% recovery efficiency (Vest, 1970)
oo
832
in, for example, Star and West Campbell fields in the Anadarko Basin, to as high as 182.5 MMMB (billion barrels) of original oil-in-place in the Cretaceous Golden Lane Trend in Mexico. Wells drilled into karsted carbonate reservoirs are among the most prolific, in terms of daily production, of wells drilled into other reservoir types. As of 1970, for example, the world's most prolific oil well was the Cerro Azul No. 4 well drilled in 1916 in the Golden Lane Trend in Mexico, which flowed at a daily rate of 260,000 barrels of oil (Guzman, 1967; Viniegra and Castillo-Tejero, 1970). Typical high daily flow rates of some of the other early wells drilled in this area range from 15,000 to 100,000 barrels of oil. Very high daily flow rates are quite common from other karsted carbonate reservoirs as well (e.g., Gatewood, 1970; Guanming and Quanheng, 1982;Watson, 1982; Qi and Xie-Pei, 1984; Craig, 1988;Troschinetz, 1992a). In Yates Field (Permian) in the Permian Basin of Texas, some wells flowed at rates of 4833 BO in 34 minutes (Craig et al., 1986). Likewise, many individual wells in karsted carbonate reservoirs commonly are characterized by very high cumulative production figures. For example, cumulative production from three wells in the Golden Lane Trend, the Juan Casiano No. 6, Cerro Azul No. 4, and the Potrero del Llano No. 4 wells, was 70, 87 and 95 MMBO, respectively (Viniegra and Castillo-Tejero, 1970). Two wells in Casablanca Field in Spain are expected to ultimately produce a total of as much as 90 MMBO (Watson, 1982). Published estimates of the percentage of hydrocarbons produced or ultimately producible from karsted carbonate reservoirs relative to total reserves in all types of traps in carbonate and/or siliciclastic rocks do not exist. Nevertheless, an attempt was made to derive such a figure based on the hydrocarbon reserve data listed in Table 9IV, from the sources in Table 9-Ill. These data, however, clearly are far from inclusive of all hydrocarbon reserves in karsted carbonate reservoirs from around the world. Likewise, production data provided by the authors listed in Table 9-IV are current only up to the date of publication of individual references. Nevertheless, with these constraints clearly understood, available data indicate that an absolute minimum of 8.45 MMMB of oil and 911 TCF gas already have been produced from discovered, identified karsted carbonate reservoirs. More importantly, these data suggest that estimated total ultimate producible reserves at current technology from such reservoirs amounts to a minimum of at least 111 MMMB of oil; published data are too scanty to derive similar estimates for ultimately producible gas reserves. According to Bois et al. (1982), total ultimately producible (at current technology), global oil reserves from Phanerozoic carbonate and siliciclastic rocks amount to 1025 MMMBO. Hence, minimum ultimately recoverable oil from karsted carbonate rocks alone amounts to no less than 11% of total global hydrocarbon reserves from all types of rocks. This figure is close to that of Tyskin (1989), who suggested that about 8% of the oil reserves in the former U.S.S.R., for example, are associated with paleokarst carbonate traps. According to Roehl and Choquette (1985, p. 1), about 60% of recoverable global oil reserves in rocks of all ages occur in carbonate reservoirs. Using this figure, and the 11% estimate derived above, simple calculation suggests that karsted carbonate reservoirs account for a minimum of 18% of the hydrocarbon reserves stored in different types of traps in all carbonate reservoirs. An identical value is generated using the estimate of Moody et al. (1970) that upwards of 30% of recoverable hydrocarbons in
833
Precambrian and Phanerozoic siliciclastic and carbonate reservoirs (multiplied by 60% of these reservoirs being in carbonate rocks: from Roehl and Choquette, 1985, p. 1) are associated with unconformities.
GEOLOGIC AND PETROPHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF KARSTED RESERVOIRS
Reservoir systems
There are many specific megascopic and microscopic features that are associated with and which characterize karsted carbonates and karsted carbonate reservoirs (Table 9-V). The subsurface recognition of these features is discussed in a later section of this chapter. Of these features, the two that are most relevant to hydrocarbon production obviously are karst-related porosity and permeability. With the exception of Type III buried hill reservoirs (described above), effective fluid transmission in most karsted carbonate reservoirs results from the presence of four main types of karst-related, porosity-permeability systems: (1) megascopic (i.e., not fabric-selective) dissolution porosity, (2) fractures and/or joints and dissolution-enlarged fractures and/or joints, (3) porosity associated with various types of breccia, and (4) preexisting matrix porosity in the affected rocks that has been enhanced or exhumed by karst dissolution. TABLE 9-V Features associated with paleokarst STRATIGRAPHIC-GEOMORPHIC Karst Landforms - Residual hills, dolines (sinkholes), dissolution valleys Unconformities MACROSCOPIC Surface karst Karren, kamenitzas, phytokarst Terra rosa and other soils Caliche (calcrete) Nonsedimentary channels Lichen structures Boxwork structure Brown-red fracture fillings Mantling breccias Chert residuum
Subsurface karst Vugs, caves, cavems In-place brecciated and fractured strata Collapse structures Dissolution-enlarged fractures Breccias Intemal sediments Speleothems MICROSCOPIC
Eluviated soil in small pores Etched carbonate cements Reddened and micritized grains Meniscus, pendant, and needle-fiber vadose cements Extensive dissolution-enlarged, preexisting porosity Source: Modified from Choquette and James, 1988.
834
Types 1 - 3 above occur together as the principal components ofmegaporosity associated with paleocaves and caverns (e.g., Choquette and James, 1988; Ford andWilliams, 1989). In fact, these three types are most frequently cited in the published literature (Table 9-111) as the main components ofkarsted reservoirs in all types ofkarst-associated hydrocarbon traps (Fig. 9-5). Accordingly, such occurrences indicate that, by far, most karsted carbonate reservoirs produce mainly from paleocaves and caverns.Accordingly, the discussions that follow focus heavily on karsted reservoirs developed in paleocaves and caverns. Such porosity-permeability systems can be: (1) primary, that is, formed and preserved during a single cycle of karstification or (2) secondary in that due to numerous cycles of karsting (which may in fact be polygenetic), previously-formed porosity may be enhanced, or previously formed but subsequently occluded karst porosity may be exhumed. Needless to say, porosity formed as a consequence of karstification can be substantially reduced, or in some cases, may not even be preserved in paleokarsts (e.g., Roehl, 1985; Entzminger and Loucks, 1992; and several papers in James and Choquette, 1988). Porosity reduction results from: (1) cementation by cave cements and later burial cements, and by infilling by sediments (Fig. 9-19); and (2) cave or cavern collapse (Fig. 9-20) (Ford, 1988). The subject of porosity reduction will not be considered further here because, in fact, this chapter is concerned with porous karst reservoirs. Readers interested in details of karst porosity preservation or destruction should consult the papers by Ford (1988), Bosak (1989b), Glazek (1989b), and Loucks and Handford (1992), and the book by Ford and Williams (1989). Megascopic dissolution porosity and fractures~joints Newly-deposited carbonate sediments and subunconformity, meteoric-altered but not karsted, older carbonate rocks commonly contain several different fabric-selective pore types: interparticle, particle-moldic, and particularly in dolomites, intercrystalline pores (terminology of Choquette and Pray, 1970). These pore types may be preserved primary, or depositional, porosity (e.g., interparticle) or secondary porosity owing to leaching (e.g., particle-moldic) (see Mazzullo and Chilingarian, 1992, for details). These matrix pore systems can be enhanced, exhumed, or in some cases, newly-created in rocks during wholescale karst dissolution. Such pores commonly occur as components of karsted carbonate reservoirs, although in many cases they largely represent preexisting matrix porosity (in some cases, perhaps karst-dissolution modified to some extent). By themselves, however, they are not diagnostic of karst dissolution processes. Rather, the most common occurrence of porosity in karsted carbonate rocks, including hydrocarbon reservoirs, is the development of megascopic porosity in the form of caves, caverns, and enlarged fractures and joints. Whereas megascopic vuggy porosity commonly is a component of many karsted reservoirs, by itself it also is not diagnostic of karst dissolution because it can also form in meteoric-altered rocks that have not been karstified. Cave and cavernous porosity in unfilled and filled caves, associated with dissolution-enlarged fractures or joints (which can be expressed as "solution pipes") and landforms such as dolines and residual hills (Fig. 9-20), are very common in many
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,--~;~,~;'.::_.....,,,+n:-.,-:,m~ 9
.
.
.
. . .
,,.,o
.
..,.,
<.,,o~ , , o , , , .
,,,,o,..,
'
"
-
,; . . . . = <.,,o;,< .c,,
"
..
.:,.,
-I
I
_r - - T - - - ~ - _ ~ = I
.....
'--
Vici~clll
i
--
ii---:------~ :_i--::~__._,_ . .......
~
.
' U
,
I,,lilltClillll S h ~ e l ( l I ~
\ \ t l i t m o ~ to
AnllliXhlel
~__.
t_l
,
,
,
~:
,
v
!
,
.....
1_ _ _ _ 2 _
I,
~
,
ana
......
CaCOi
".,~..
A,J
q---
\
Gi4yoermaeo
Or~nl~
~=~ ~ B e l l canopy flowslonl
.
"S
.oo.~
k
Spar t . ;
I..__1
:
,,-.,...
.
.
.
.
c.,..k~.
. :
"
\-
I )i _I _- :-),.~
: i
. T . ~ ',
'
:-,-J--v-~Tr-~-F~'~
I .....I.
.I I
"--
--
m
- -I . . . . '
\'~ ,7/
,,.,.0,.,,.,
r-_-
V" i
*-L-
r162
T--'I-
I --
i- ;--;
9
\ s.v,., "/IN.t .....~ ,-.
-
i-
;L
.... ~ _ - - r _ _
,
.
r ....
T-"
' I
sonm n,.~
,.,..,.. 9
.. r P X
SleliQm4e
~' --;-~ "T
I--*.--;-'-,
'~
=
- ~ T - ~ - T
--r-~
~ -
,~,
L_
_:i- ---~-
i _.~--~
df
..,, sp., ~ : __7L ~ .'~~__-_-_~-...__. ~
T_----r--~-:_::m_-:
.:._ I...,__, .... , _.~__~::: I ... .. .. ... ;* ......... , l ....
O0
Fig. 9-19. Cave-filling, precipitated cements and speleothems. (From Ford and Williams, 1989; reprinted with permission from Unwin Hyman.)
t.#i
836 Do~-m
,
J]
Vadose C a n y o n
I
Vados i Zone
~
Sediment-Filed Passage
/
.i
Phreat~ct=wlUa~ettrlU:[tTi i2bll bge' r d Z o n e
11
~
~
'
~
Phreatlc Tube
-
-
-
-
L ~ / /
Stream Sediment
Cave-Floor Breakdown Breccia
Fig. 9-20 9 Cave-filling deposits: internal sediments and breccias. (From Loucks and Handford, 1992" reprinted with permission from the Permian Basin Section SEPM.)
of the karsted reservoir examples listed in Table 9-111 and illustrated in Fig. 9-5. Several examples of the numbers of caves and caverns in specific hydrocarbon fields are provided in published sources. According to Craig (1988), for example, there are 285 caves identified in 142 out of the 898 wells that were drilled to 1983 in Yates Field (Permian) in the Permian Basin of Texas (Fig. 9-21). DeHaas and Jones (1988) re:..
:"
YATES
F I E L D UNIT
-.
9 9
9 9
:
9
9
~
9
~" :
9
9 9
.
.
.
9
:
tl e,
" ~
9 e 9 9
9
.
:
""::.. " "
".'''
o
9
9
. 9
9
9 9
9
. .." .9. . . . . .
I
"'o 9 ~
,
".,...
9
9 9 "
"
9 *.
" -
L
9 I
.
"-:.~
9
9
9
9
.
.
9 .% 9
.
.
.
or Caves
1
9
.
o
." 9
.
.
9
9
.
9
.9
t.'"
9 9
.
9
"
9
. 9
9
e ~ .
9
.
.
9 .
9
oe
9
.
o
~
/ l
L
9
W e l l in S t a t i s t i c a l D a t a F i l e
9 = Well with Cave
.
9
..
9
l
9
.
....
9
9=
eo
.oe-e
9
. 9149
":...
9
9 "9
9 9 .
.
9
9
.9
9
9
o'e"
o
9
" .'%. .
~
.
9
-:..;'.' 99 o .
I
9
. . 9 9 9 9~176 9 9 9 - 9 9 9" . 9" 9 9 . 9 9 9 9 9 9 . 9 9 9. 9 . " 9 ." . 9 9 . 9. 9
!.,
l
.
.
9 " 99ir " 0. 9 9" 9
.
v--J
:
I
L 1 mile 1
kilometer
Fig. 9-21. Extent of pale 9 development in unitizedYates Field (Permian), Permian Basin, Texas. (From Craig, 1988; reprinted with permission from Springer-Verlag.)
837
ported 170 caves in a 6500 square mile (16,834 square kilometer) region associated with hydrocarbon production in theAlbion-Scipio-Pulaski Trend in the southern Michigan Basin. Caves and caverns that appear to be at least mostly open, and associated dissolution-enlarged fractures, account for huge hydrocarbon storage volumes and production from, for example, the Precambrian to Ordovician Renqiu Field in China, the PermianYates Field and Pennsylvanian HorseshoeAtoll Trend in the Permian Basin of Texas, and the Cretaceous Golden Lane Trend in Mexico (Table 9-IV). The presence of such open megapores commonly is noted by sudden bit drops, rapid drilling breaks, and tremendous losses of circulating mud during drilling (e.g., Gatewood, 1970; Guangming and Quanheng, 1982; Watson, 1982; Qi and Xie-Pei, 1984; Craig, 1988; DeHaas and Jones, 1988). Reported heights of individual caves and caverns in such situations vary from 1 - 124 ft (<1 - 38 m) high (Gatewood, 1970; Guangming and Quanheng, 1982; Qi and Xie-Pei, 1984; Craig, 1988; DeHaas and Jones, 1988; Entzminger and Loucks, 1992). Porosity associated with breccias By far, however, the majority of paleocaves and caverns identified in karsted carbonate reservoirs are mostly or entirely filled dominantly by breccia and subordinate amounts of associated cave sediments, and locally, cements (Figs. 9-19 and 9-20). When porous, such cave-fill deposits also are identified during drilling by the criteria listed above. Kerans (1988, 1989) described a specific model of hydrocarbon reservoirs in filled cave/cavern systems that, with local minor variation, has been applied to many karsted carbonate reservoirs (Fig. 9-22). Filled caves/caverns are recognized by the presence of dominantly carbonateclast breccias that overlie intact host carbonates, and in turn, are overlain by highly brecciated carbonates. Basal breccias in such sequences are referred to as "lower collapse zone breccias" that formed as a result of wall and roof collapse during cave/cavern formation. They consist of chaotic, clast-supported breccias that typically are 5 0 - 60 ft ( 1 5 - 18 m) thick. Voids between clasts are partly filled to completely occluded by internal sediments (carbonate mud, shales) and later cements. In the Ordovician examples given by Kerans (1988, 1989), inter-clast porosity in this zone varies from less than 1% to 15% (some porosity may be contributed by matrix pores in the clasts themselves). Overlying "cave fill" breccias result from ultimate cave collapse due to the weight of overlying deposits. Breccias consist dominantly of carbonate clasts, the textures being both clast-supported and matrix-supported. Interstices between clasts generally are mostly occluded by internal sediments (sandstone and shale) and some cements, and porosity in such zones generally is low (1 - 3%). The overlying "cave roof' facies represents collapsed cave roofs, characterized mostly by in-situ brecciation textures, that may grade upward into intact roof rocks. This facies has upwards of 20% porosity (between the clasts and some matrix pores within the clasts) in the examples described by Kerans (1988, 1989). General aspects of cave/ cavern-filling breccias are described and illustrated in Loucks and Handford (1992) (Fig. 9-23) and Wilson et al. (1992). According to Kerans (1988, 1989), the thickness of individual, filled paleocave/ cavern sequences in the Ordovician examples described are as much as 650 ft (198 m). Associated breccia-plugged, dissolution-enlarged fractures or joints may extend
838
GR SP
Res.
)
.'rOP/JO~NS FM.,,I
?
Core Karst fabrics facies I / /I Intact l / l roof II, //l
~
O
~-15a
Cave roof
~Fracture
I -'~ _/ Ik/! porosity T I l l
fill
~ [ /
P i /
/
~
/ L o w e r ....
:,... ua ~
CO,
din',",'~Vuggy 1 1 porosity
1 I1
EXPLANATION //
-j Intact dolostone Fracture-mosaic dolostone breccia
" ".'.'. Quartz sand | dt
Chert fragments
I~ ~ . . ~ Siliciclastic-matrixsupported chaotic breccia l~,~fl
Clast-sul)ported chaotic breccia
--'---'---- Shale ~)
Dolostone clasts
Fig. 9-22. Interpretive model of the occurrence of cave/cavern-filling and associated breccias. (From Kerans, 1988; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
vertically as much as 900 ft (275 m) below unconformities. Reported heights of individual, filled paleocaves and caverns, from other published sources wherein specific heights are given, range from 2 ft to as much as 985 ft ( 0 . 6 - 300 m) (Guangming and Quanheng, 1982; Dussert et al., 1988; Amthor and Friedman, 1989; Bliefnick, 1992; Holtz and Kerans, 1992). In many cases these heights, whether they occur in filled or
839
CAVE-ROOF
. . . .
~
~:~_~
.,--- ~'
- :, _ .,.-- ,.
--
C.AOr,C
,~
?' 2
~ ~ . ~ ~ .
.REAKDOW.
~-~~___
/
CRACKLED "~
BREAKDOWN
\ \
BRECCIA /
[BLOCKS CRACKLE UPON IMPACT]
~'t.]
T RA NS PO RT ED
BREAKDOWN
BRECCIA
[TRANSPORTED BY FLUVIALMASS-FLOW PROCES3ES AFTER CA)ELAPSE] .................................................................................................................................................... 03 UJ 03 ',r
.....
-
.,.,
~ . ~
...J--
i!1
03
~03
a.C[:: "~ I--
~-
LU
BURIAL C A V E - R O O F CRACKLE BRECCIA [COMPACTIONOVER COLLAPSEDCHAMBER;
CASTS.RE ~OOSEL~TOr,~Hr~ F ~ D I
[: ] ],~
.
,~ . . ' ~
/
/ I~,----,,~--..~_ ' ~" '; ' ~' -
, _~ ---,--:~ ~ ~ , _ _ . ~ . ~ . ~ ,, ? ~ ' ~ --"~\ ~ ~ ~ ,j.' f - ~ , ~ ' ~ a ~ .~~ . '"~-~ " " - - ' ~"~" ' < ~ ~ ~ ~ ' "~- . ~ ~ "
/"~~'~~7~~~.._~.____~
<0
/ / ' %~
o ~ :" ~ ~."~ '~
\
BURIAL C H A O T I C BREAKDOWN BRECCIA [CHAMBERCOLLAPSE DURING
tuO
N N
\
'.~.,.~...=..:..~:~. :~......,,~.~,:..... ~...~: :
~.,
\
,
REBRECCIATED CHAOTIC B R E A K D O W N BRECCIA REDUCTION 9 OF CLAST SIZE CRACKLED 9 BLOCKS
[
CRACKLE BRECCIA
|
CHAOTIC
BASIC BRECCIA
BRECCIA
!
TYPES
Fig. 9-23. Processes of cave-related brecciation. (From Loucks and Handford, 1992" reprinted with permission from the Permian Basin Section SEPM.)
840
unfilled paleocaves and caverns, closely approximate the thicknesses of individual pay zones in the gross productive sections. On the other hand, gross thicknesses of productive strata in karsted reservoirs, including filled and unfilled paleocaves and caverns and associated dissolutionenlarged fractures and karst-enhanced matrix porosity in nearly horizontal to relatively low-dipping strata, can be quite thick. Casablanca Field in Spain, Puckett Field inTexas, Renqiu Field in China, and Cactus Field in the Campeche-Reforma Trend in Mexico, for example, are developed in relatively gently-dipping strata on horst blocks and within anticlines. Gross pay thicknesses in these fields are 5 0 0 - 6 0 0 ft (153 - 183 m), 1600 ft (488 m), 2300 ft (702 m), and a maximum recorded thickness of 3280 ft (1000 m), respectively (Santiago-Acevedo, 1980; Watson, 1982; Qi and Xie-Pei, 1984; Loucks and Anderson, 1985). Such thick, gross productive sections result from extensive karstification during multiple periods of erosion along parasequence boundaries, during single cycles of exposure, and more commonly, from superimposed polycyclic karsting along composite unconformities. Many such reservoirs also are highly fractured. Of course, karsted beds in more strongly deformed strata such as anticlines likewise may also compose thick gross productive sections by virtue of high angles of dip and the presence of fractures: for example, 1000 ft (305 m) in Kirkuk Field in Iraq (Daniel, 1954). Karst reservoirs not associated with paleocaves and caverns
As mentioned earlier, the bulk of the reservoirs listed in Table 9-III are associated with paleocaves and caverns. Some of the sources listed in this table, however, did not mention a component of karst reservoir porosity-permeability contributed specifically by paleocaves and caverns (Lowenstam, 1948; Vest, 1970; Dolly and Busch, 1972; Marafi, 1972; Bebout and Loucks, 1974; Mesolella et al., 1974; Ebanks et al., 1977; Rao and Talukdar, 1980; Harris and Frost, 1984; Garfield and Longman, 1989; Geesaman and Scott, 1989). That is not to say, however, that such features are not present in these reservoirs as much as they simply might not have been recognized. In some of these cases, for example, the presence ofpaleocaves and caverns can reasonably be inferred on the basis of the presence of porous zones associated with bedded breccias occurring at some distance beneath unconformities and/or sand- or breccia-filled, dissolution-enlarged fissures (e.g., Lowenstam, 1948; Bebout and Loucks, 1974; Mesolella et al., 1974; Garfield and Longman, 1989; Geesaman and Scott, 1989), features that typically are associated with caves and caverns. In other cases, evidence of their likely existence is provided by the occurrence of an increasing frequency of large dissolution vugs in strata beneath unconformities, especially when they coincide with the presence of buried hills and other karst landforms (e.g., Vest, 1970; Dolly and Busch, 1972; Rao and Talukdar, 1980). In the few remaining cases there simply is no definitive evidence for the existence of paleocaves and caverns, although the reservoirs were still considered to have been karsted (Marafi, 1972; Ebanks et al., 1977; Harris and Frost, 1984). These authors indicated that porosity systems in these reservoirs include vugs (some of which are dissolutionenlarged biomolds), interparticle pores, and intercrystalline pores in dolomites rather than megapore systems as described above. These three cases represent only a small percentage ofkarsted carbonate reservoirs.
841
continuity
Reservoir
Particular styles (i.e., geometries and trends) of cave and cavern formation and occurrence are controlled by, among other factors, attitude of bedding, fluid flow parameters, presence or absence of fractures and their spacing, and the specific mode ofkarst origin (Ford, 1988; Ford and Williams, 1989). Hence, the spatial geometries of cave and cavern systems in karsted carbonate rocks are inherently complex, especially when they are superimposed on rocks with preexisting or karst-enhanced matrix porosity. They vary from bedding concordant and discordant, horizontal to inclined (following bedding), and tabular (Fig. 9-24), to bedding-discordant and rectilinear (Fig. 9-25), to highly anastomosing (Fig. 9-26). Likewise, reservoir occurrence and production characteristics in paleocave/cavern reservoir systems also are complex. On the /epikarst ~
. ,~,-~-~-I---~
n e
l,,,"
~
y/BATHYPHREATIC / CAVE
PHREATIC CAVE WITH
MULTIPLE LOOPS ,,
CAVE LEVELLED COMPONENTS
HREATIC & WATERTABLE-
"1
"b +'- ,<~ f 1_..21..-.,-r162 -.~ " ~ ( ~ r
~ .' ....
Ts
..
,-
,"
'y
7 s
II
.... ,'w~.~..,,Y - . } 7 .
i/
,d" ...,~ J , , ~ ""
'
,,.,i .
IDEAL WA~ERTABLE CAVE
Fig. 9-24. Cave/cavem occurrence: phreatic and water table caves that are bedding concordant and/or discordant, tabular, and horizontally disposed to inclined. (From Ford and Williams, 1989; reprinted with permission from Unwin Hyman.)
842
L
j
200m
Fig. 9-25. Cave/cavem occurrence: map view of bedding-discordant and highly rectilinear cave systems. (From Ford and Williams, 1989; reprinted with permission from Unwin Hyman.)
ISLAND SURFACE
SEA LEVEL
~.
\
,mR
i
|.~.'lTl'~.'.sr~l
FRACTURES
Fig. 9-26. Cave/cavern occurrence: highly anastomosing cave systems. The numbers 1, 2, and 3 refer to large caves, elongated in direction of paleoflow; 4 refers to caves associated with soil processes. (From Craig, 1988; reprinted with permission from Springer-Verlag.) smallest scale individual, filled p a l e o c a v e s / c a v e r n s typically are vertically compartmentalized because, as described in Kerans' (1988, 1989) model, relatively nonporous and nonpermeable cave-fill breccias separate reservoirs that occur in overlying, porous brecciated cave roof and underlying lower collapse zone facies (Fig. 922). On a larger scale, stacking ofpaleocaves/caverns in a stratigraphic section, whether filled or unfilled, can result in a thick gross pay section that likewise is vertically compartmentalized into a series of reservoir galleries (Fig. 9-27). In such a case, the occurrence ofnonpermeable beds both between individual cave levels (Fig. 9-27) and within individual caves (Fig. 9-22) results in complex vertical reservoir heterogeneity (compartmentalization). Production from associated buried hills, dolines, and dissolu-
~,RCO BLOCK 31 UNIT"W" #1 CRANE COUNTY, TEXAS
~,RCO B L O C K 31 U N I T "W" # 1 CRANE CO., TX SP
ISTIVITY
Joins Fro. lo400IlenOurger m. -
Vuggy Host Rock
JOINS FM. ELLENBURGER G
/
Cave Zone 1
105o0_
Crackled Cave Roof
Breakdown Breccia " . . . . Autochthonous Cave-Sediment Fill
-
3AVE ZONE 1
)
Cave Zone 2 ~ . q r _
9
-
Crackled Cave Roof Breakdown Breccia . . . . -Autochthonous Cave-Sediment Fill
-
~AVE ZONE 2
Crackled Cave Roof
10600
AIIochthonous Cave-Sediment Fill
Cave Zone 3
'')1 Breakdown Breccia
3AVE ZONE 3 - ~ ~ - - - lo7oo--
NOTE: i
r
~
Breakdown Breccia
~"
a:
Breakdown Breccia
Porosity
Fig. 9-27. Vertical compartmentalization due to the presence of stacked cave levels. On the figure on the right, also note finer-scale reservoir :ompartmentalization within individual caves-compare to Fig. 9-22. (From Loucks and Handford, 1992; reprinted with permission from the Permian Basin Section SEPM.)
~O
844
ARCO BLOCK #31 UNIT " W " #1
Shallow Sink Hole Vuggy Host Rock
Solution Pipes
./
Crackled . - - - - - - - ~ } ," Cave Roof ' '
i/
r"
jk
t
Breakdown Breccia
-------~~
Cave Zone I
--'>
Cave-sediment Fill
i"
.f
,,..:
<
~ ~ ~> Cave Zone 2
\
.,,oc t onous Cave-sediment Fill
~) 9
. Pillar ~
O
.<:::3
-
"
c~
~
.
i
U
~'-
~_ 9 ...
[~ 9i~7 O o
<~
D.,~
~'~
.
.
D
~ "~ Cave Zone 3
Breakdown Breccia
Vuggy Host Rock
~
~
Vuggy Host Rock
Fig. 9-28. Variety of potential reservoirs in paleocaves and cavems: horizontal, filled and unfilled caves (some of which are separated into discrete reservoir compartments by pillars or other non-permeable zones), dissolution pipes, associated buried hills and vuggy host rocks. (From Loucks and Handford, 1992; reprinted with permission from the Permian Basin Section SEPM.)
tion-enlarged fractures and joints further complicates reservoir characteristics in paleocave and cavem systems (Fig. 9-28). Although all included karst facies (porous and nonporous) may be laterally persistent, at least for some distance (Kerans, 1988, 1989), cave and cavem systems are notoriously laterally heterogeneous (Thrailkill, 1968). Reservoirs in such systems likewise are most commonly laterally restricted and heterogeneous because of (1) variations in effective porosity and permeability reflecting the occurrence of different specific facies within karst profiles, and (2) transitions from porous karst to impermeable nonkarst facies (e.g., see Figs. 9-19, 9-20, and 9-26). Such reservoirs are excellent candidates for horizontal drilling, which increases ultimate hydrocarbon recovery (e.g., Dussert et al., 1988). Most of the karsted hydrocarbon reservoirs listed in Table 9-III are both vertically and laterally heterogeneous and compartmentalized. Field examples associated with productive paleocaves and caverns, however, are known wherein reservoir transmissibility and production characteristics are quite homogeneous both vertically and laterally; for example, Yates Field in the Permian Basin of Texas (Craig, 1988) and Trenton Limestone production in the Michigan Basin (DeHaas and Jones, 1988). Amposta Marino Field in Spain is a reservoir with well-connected matrix and cavem-
845 STAGE I
Comportmentolised meteoric phreatic system
....
tilt block
STAGE II sea-level rise
i Mixing zone overprint (improved communication between porositynetwork) ~
_-_
estof t
~ s t r u c t u r e
Fig. 9-29. Polygenetic, polycyclic karst, Amposta Marino Field, Spain: an earlier cycle of meteoric karst (stage I) was overprinted by mixed meteoric-marine karstification (stage II) which resulted in the occurrence of a well-connected zone of horizontal matrix and cavernous reservoir porosity. (From Wright, 1991; reprinted with permission from Postgraduate Research Institute for Sedimentology.)
ous porosity developed as a result of the superposition of meteoric karst and later mixed meteoric-marine karst (Fig. 9-29) (Wigley et al., 1988). Another well-known example is the Renqiu buried hill field in China, in which reservoir pressure, the oilwater contact, and its hydraulic regime are unified across the field (Fig. 9-30) (Guangming and Quanheng, 1982; Qi and Xie-Pei, 1984). Such reservoirs very commonly are highly fractured. Porosity-permeability and recovery efficiency in karst reservoirs
Data provided by selected sources cited in Table 9-III were summarized to indicate the range of porosity and permeability that typify karsted carbonate reservoirs (Fig. 931). Although a wide range of values are indicated, many karsted carbonate reservoirs clearly have values of porosity and permeability that far exceed average values for typical carbonate reservoirs (which are, according to data from fields described in Roehl and Choquette, 1985, 13.4% and 72.3 mD, respectively; Choquette and Pray, 1970, reported that typical carbonate reservoirs have 5 - 15% porosity). Dissolution-enlarged fractures are virtually ubiquitous in all karsted carbonate reservoirs. Likewise, karsted carbonate reservoirs are characterized by some of the highest recovery efficiencies of all reservoirs. Values reported in the sources in Table 9-III range from 21% (Amthor and Friedman, 1989) to a high of 80% (Brady et al., 1980).
846
Horizontal Karst Zones
/
1 2 3
.92~ ; ' : - : - : - . ~4~.~>~.~3~.~.~.~:~~
~.:..
-600-
-I000
.+
.
Ek
.
Kors't
r
~..i
Coves
m !!iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii! H o ri z o nl-ol
Ko r s t
Zo ne s
Fig. 9-30. Continuous karst reservoir zones in cavernous Renqiu Field, China. Key: E = Paleogene, Ek = Eocene, Zn = late Precambrian. (From Qi and Xie-Pei, 1984; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.) RESERVOIR AGE/LOCATION
l'
9
PALEOCENE (LIBYA)
I
CRETACEOUS (MIDDLE EAST)
I
!
I
I
JURASSIC-CRETACEOUS (MEXICO)
I
JURASSIC (SPAIN)
'1
H ~
I
PERMIAN (PERMIAN BASIN)
9 REPORTED AVERAGE RANGE OF REPORTED AVERAGES RANGE
I
PENNSYLVANIAN (PERMIAN BASINI
MISSISSIPPIAN (KANSAS, WILLISTON BASIN) DEVONIAN (BASIN & RANGE, USA)
SILURIAN-DEVONIAN (PERMIAN BASIN)
I
9 I
I
ORDOVICIAN (ANADARKO AND ARKOMA BASINS)
-I
I I
ORDOVICIAN (PERMIAN BASIN)
PRECA MBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN (CHINA)
I 0
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
10
20
30
0
100
1000
POROSITY
(%)
PERMEABILITY
I 10000
(rnd)
Fig. 9-31. Averages and ranges of porosity and permeability in selected karsted carbonate reservoirs, from data provided by sources listed in Table 9-II1.
847
SUBSURFACE RECOGNITION OF KARSTED CARBONATES The many distinguishing macroscopic and microscopic features of karst listed in Table 9-V are relatively easy to identify in outcrops and along present-day landscapes. In the subsurface, however, many of these features can be readily recognized, some can be recognized with difficulty, and others can not. For example, the karst identity of macroscopic and microscopic features (such as karren, boxwork and lichen structures, speleothems and other cave-related cements, and eluviated soil in small pores) often are extremely difficult to recognize even with detailed petrographic studies of core samples, and especially so if only drill cutting samples are available for study. For this reason, the real or imagined absence of such features has, in many cases, undoubtedly resulted in karst reservoirs going unrecognized. Notable exceptions in which some of these features have been identified are described by, for example: (1) Viniegra and Castillo-Tejero (1970), who reported that " . . . great pieces of stalactites..." (p. 316) from a cavern that was encountered in the Cerro Azul No. 4 well in the Golden Lane Trend in Mexico were blown out of that well during drilling; and among others, (2) by Craig (1988) and Entzminger and Loucks (1992), who reported the presence of recognizable cave cements in cores from Yates Field (Permian) and in Devonian karsted carbonates, respectively, in the Permian Basin of Texas. The recognition of karst in the subsurface proceeds in two ways: (1) recognition on seismic sections and by subsurface geologic mapping prior to drilling, and (2) recognition during and subsequent to drilling a well by analysis of drilling rates, drilling characteristics, and well logs. Several methods of recognizing karsted carbonates, at least on the gross scale, are briefly considered in this section; aspects are summarized in Martinez del Olmo and Esteban (1983), Wright ( 1991 ), and the specific references provided below.
Seismic and subsurface geologic mapping prior to drilling The stratigraphic-geomorphic features listed in Table 9-V, specifically, karst landforms and unconformities, often are resolvable in the subsurface by geologic mapping and on seismic sections. In mature basins, available well control commonly is dense enough to allow geologists to map paleotopography along known unconformities by means of structure and/or isopach maps. Such maps are useful in the identification of buried hills and areas in which the presence of abundant dolines (sinkholes) may be indicative of buried paleocaves and caverns (Figs. 9-7, 9-8, 911, 9-12. 9-32). In immature basins, however, remote sensing methods instead are used in a predictive exploration sense because of the paucity of well control. The most commonly used remote sensing method is analysis of conventional twodimensional and three-dimensional seismic sections.
Applications of two-dimensional seismic surveys A summary of the use of conventional two-dimensional seismic sections in the exploration for karsted carbonate reservoirs is given by Fontaine et al. (1987). The first step toward exploring for such reservoirs involves the location of unconformities on
848
9
,
~
)o.
f
9
C.l.:Sft
Fig. 9-32. Recognition ofkarsted carbonates from available well data: (A) Structure map, top of Ellenburger (Ordovician) unconformity, Emma Field, Permian Basin, Texas. (B) Isopach map of post-Ellenburger strata showing occurrence of sinkholes indicative of cavernous zones in Ellenburger. (From Kerans, 1988; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.) seismic sections, below which karsted carbonates are anticipated to be present. In most cases, unconformity recognition is relatively easy following the methods of seismic sequence stratigraphic analysis presented in several papers in Payton (1977) (Fig. 93 3). Yet, the problem often remains that specific porous and permeable zones beneath these unconformities inherently are difficult to precisely define and locate because they
W
3
1
j~
A
2
J~
0
E
$10m
I lIll';..... l~,llIlqi,",[ll~'lt!~l~l,t,'lIi,:t'[tt[I ;'i~tlit,l.itiL',~,li~. l[hlt'.lllill.dtlll. ll~lllLLllllIlll~IIl[, Utt lllllllllllllllllllil[lltlllllllllllllltttlll IlllllllltlllllllJlilillltlllllllllllllllllldllllll, ,. , , ~ IIIIlllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllhllllll~ ,,,, w,,6.~l ' Illrllll ' I l~,~llllil [ Ill lIiiii1 I,llllbl.ll,,,I,, I I~11111 Il,tJl l Illllt[lltl~l,lll I ! ~,' ,:!,I,lal!tlltllttttltit,t!u,l!..~,lld.I. ,,,,,~,,,,~,,,,,, l.., I ,,i,,lI~ll,,'"',,','l~,,~1 ,, ".,,~,~,,i,'[[II ~ Ill ,l~WlIlllllll ,, . IIIItlllllllil[[ !~~t,t l~llllllltllt~ll[, ,i,tllltl!l t,~i;ll",,l',i . ..;I... . ; , , , . . . .
,,,l,,,"',i,.~r'.,,, ,,,,=,-'~'"" ' ;,;., , I,I I~ ,, .., "i ' ':;;;;
. ,.,~:., !~,;:;t, '""KXrS'rl'i:~i"'[5"X'i~l ,r~m,~'.l,..lllll',:*:;.t:lh~;r:ff;l l,.l:,a,~l;,', 0 IIT ,.l:lt,,..ll.:l . ,,,,.1i~' I "' "i~'~,~'~. .............. ::. !., : ....... i, '.
:; :11! ,'.,'
, , , . , ~ ~ , , i , ~ - ~ ~ , ~
b ~ ! i ~ ~ ! ~ - A' .~!!:.. i . . ~ ~ . :
'l?,~l'.'lt'~
.............................................
i ~............
- ." . . . . .
,
'
.
' I~nt
~u-~.:ii~ :...':: .: ,.'gZ .'~1~
.u. ,r,.?~,,.200
':~- ~.,!,
. z,.,,
9.,I.%;
~!l!li,'~,',i,,:.
.."1'..
!!ii!i!i!iii! iiii!i!i i!i iii ii ii!iiiii!ili,iiiiili
:.",~"~. [l::.::l;i..,;.7-,.:-'..t:,~,,,i,:,,,,~I,'I,~
"-~;5':'~ 9 ~:..... '~::~,'"..:
..... i,,,.,; '~....
~.~ 't;.~,~
":~.;'.ii,~
Fig. 9-33. Identification of unconformity (arrow) by seismic sequence stratigraphic analysis and predicted occurrence of subunconformity karst, Bresse Basin, France. (From Fontaine et al., 1987; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
849
O
000
too
.
..
o ~oo
--
o ]'RAVERS
TRENTON GLENMO01
I 000
1
0OO
Fig. 9-34. Narrow, porous dolomite reservoir inAlbion-Scipio-Pulaski Trend (TypeVI reservoirs associated with fracture/fault trends, southern Michigan Basin: see Fig. 9-17) defined by subtle changes in waveform and attenuation of amplitudes between 0.715 and 0.760 sec. (From Catacosinos et al., 1990; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.) generally do not have seismic facies patterns that are distinct from compact, nonporous carbonates (Fontaine et al., 1987). Catacosinos et al. (1990) have shown that subtle porosity zones can in some cases be defined by changes in seismic waveforms and attenuation of reflector amplitudes beneath unconformities (Fig. 9-34). Jenyon (1984) demonstrated that dissolutional collapse structures in buried strata can be recognized on conventional seismic sections by the presence of abundant reflector irregularities (Fig. 9-35). Vandenberghe et al. (1986) demonstrated the application of offset-dependent seismic reflector amplitude analysis on conventional seismic sections to the location and extent of porous zones in karsted, water-bearing limestone reservoirs of Early Carboniferous age in Belgium. This procedure relates amplitude analysis as a function of porosity (Fig. 9-36), such that porous zones can be distinguished from adjoining nonporous zones (Fig. 9-37). Fontaine et al. (1987) applied this method to the recognition of porous zones in Barremian karsted limestones in Europe (Fig. 9-38).
Applications of three-dimensional seismic surveys Analysis of more sophisticated three-dimensional seismic sections has proven to be most useful in karst recognition. Bouvier et al. (1990), for example, showed that there is a marked change from positive to negative acoustic impedance contrasts with increasing degrees of cavernous porosity and brecciation development, so that
850
A
~--
3kms
--~
Fig. 9-35. Seismic response to karst. (A) Dissolution-collapse structure at "A" in Zechstein, North Sea. (B) Areal dissolution at top of Zechstein at "TZ". (From Jenyon, 1984; reprinted with permission from Marine and Petroleum Geology.)
851
Ao S,
__
So I~o
A~ 6 R,
,
.
.
.
Aa ~ Sa Ra
$3
,
,
A3 6
,
.
COMPACT LIMESTONE
II
,,
KARSTIFIED LIMESTONE
Fig. 9-36. Vandenberghe et al.' s (1986) method of seismic amplitude analysis as a function of offset for the recognition and distinction of non-porous (left) and porous, karsted limestones (right). Key: A o, A~, A2, and A 3 refer to magnitudes of reflection for So,R~ (near offset), S~-R] (far offset), S2-R2 (near offset), and S3-R3 (far offset), respectively. (From Fontaine et al., 1987; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
anomalously high amplitudes occur on three-dimensional seismic sections. Such characteristics allowed recognition of porous and cavernous karsted zones in the Amposta Marino Field in Spain (Fig. 9-39). Brown (1985) illustrated the occurrence of karst sinkholes on seiscrop sections generated from three-dimensional seismic in Mackerel Field in Australia (Fig. 9-40).
Karst recognition from drilling characteristics and well data Several methods of identifying karsted zones during or subsequent to drilling and on various downhole logs are available: 1) Dipmeter data locally may indicate drape of overlying strata on topographically irregular karst surfaces (Fig. 9-41) (Vandenberghe et al., 1986). (2) As mentioned in a preceding section of this chapter, rapid increases in drilling rates, lost circulation (mud loss), and drilling bit drops commonly occur when drilling through karsted carbonate rocks. (3) Various downhole logs can be useful to identify zones with exceptionally high porosities suggestive of karst dissolution. For example, Kerans (1988) showed that different gamma ray/spontaneous potential and resistivity signatures assist in defining cave roof and cave-filling deposits in karsted, Ordovician dolomites in Texas (Fig. 9-22). Sonic, density, and caliper logs likewise often display uphole gradients that relate to the degree of fissuring, brecciation, and cavernous porosity developed in karsted carbonate strata (Martinez del Olmo and Esteban, 1983; Craig, 1988). (4) Of course, analysis of cores provides important visual documentation on the occurrence of vuggy porosity, cave-filling breccias, and cave cements in karsted reservoirs.
852
, I
. i~
~i'i
84
,,. .
I
~! .' i
! ,~. ',.,.i : i., : I..
1,1(.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0.500
.,.
~
0.600
;,
.............................
o.,oo
i'i1 .t ~ p ~.
1.400
N E A R STACK
B
FAR STACK . i.
O.lO0
I. I o o
,
.
..,:
.
.....................
......................
KARST LEVEL KARST ........ L E V E L
Fig. 9-37. Vandenberghe et al.'s (1986) method of offset-dependent seismic reflector amplitude analysis for the recognition ofkarsted carbonates. (A) Raw seismicdata, arrows indicate reflections from karsted level. (B) Increasing reflector strength at karst level shown in the far stack (fight) relative to the near stack (left). The far stack section contains traces at offsets corresponding to the VSP traces between each pair of arrows in figure A. (From Vandenberghe et al., 1986; reprinted with the permission of First Break.)
853
SE
NW
0
1 Km
A
E i. I--
IATES
62
STACKEDSECTION
FIELDA
WELLC
Fig. 9-38. Application of offset-dependent seismic reflector amplitude analysis to karst recognition in Barremian limestones in Europe; porosity in Field A is distinguished from compact limestones in well C. (From Fontaine et al., 1987; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
W
E /~
546
74(
/~
8O7
AMB-10
AMC-
3
._ .....
":'-"~""
1000
"'--
~ "
, _
" "" "-"
-
-.
.~..
~
.
~
1000
--
:,wt.z._
__.,..=
: L- ~.L~.,..z.-z~
.
-
..-
. _
_ _-._.,'.-~-
o') E
~.--,~,
.
.=_ " 9-..~m
1500
1
,,,. ,,I-'
,,,.: ~,~,._ . ~ . ' , 1 , ~ , . . ~
"
.
-
.~,,_
. . . .
. "
,L,~....
-'-
. ". .
"
i-,,'9 "
.
"--
-.,,..
B2
.F_ I.-.-
1500
9 .
---C
I 146
106
I 19
1 km
Fig. 9-39. Recognition ofkarsted limestones in buried hill Amposta Marino Field, Spain, on 3-D seismic; C points to top of the reservoir. (From Bouvier et al., 1990" reprinted with permission from Geologie en Mijnbouw).
854
Fig. 9-40. Sinkholes recognized on seiscrop sections from 3-Dseismic data, Mackerel Field, Australia. (From Brown, 1985; reprinted with permission from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.)
855
M ERKSPL A S - BEERSE DEPTH (ml
-,t
.,oo
i
I
~
z
i
WEL L
t
~
-~--7---~-r-
1620 "
,
~;
i
"~
:
. ~,,
i
i
"l~ '
,~o
I
r
16z.0
.
.
.
't
!
i
I
=
~ '
i
I
N4MUR/4N i i . i I O/NANrI4N . . . . . T"--' I 1
,
,
'
"
1 1650
i
:
:
1660
1
'!'
'
~:
Ir
:
"t'" I
7670
'
-
12!t! F
~
._.
~
,
i l l l l
" -'-
oo
'
I I
..o~. ,,~o
. . . . '
- t...... F~--
I, 0
tO
i 20
30
t.O
50
60
70 80 90
DIP
Fig. 9-41. Drape of Namurian strata overlying karsted Dinantian limestones indicated by dipmeter data. (From Vandenberghe et al., 1986; reprinted with permission from First Break.)
856
CONCLUSIONS
Hydrocarbon production from karsted carbonate rocks accounts for huge volumes of already produced oil and gas, and existing reserves, in Precambrian and Phanerozoic reservoirs from around the world. At least 11% of total global hydrocarbon reserves in both siliciclastic and carbonate rocks are stored in karsted carbonate reservoirs. Reservoirs occur dominantly in buffed paleocaves in subunconformity karsts related to surficial, meteoric dissolution. Reservoir traps most commonly represent buried hills (structured and unstructured) that reflect residual karst landforms, and also in more subtle types of subunconformity traps. Average porosity and permeability in karsted carbonate reservoirs are considerably higher than in non-karsted carbonate reservoirs, although such reservoirs typically are highly compartmentalized and laterally and vertically heterogeneous. Karsted carbonates can be recognized in the subsurface by geologic mapping, on seismic sections, during drilling, and on several types of downhole logging tools.
REFERENCES Amthor, J.E. and Friedman, G.M., 1989. Petrophysical character of Ellenburger karst facies: Stateline (Ellenburger) field, Lea County, southeastern New Mexico. In: B.K. Cunningham and D.W. Cromwell (Editors), The Lower Paleozoic of West Texas and Southern New Mexico- Modern Exploration Concepts. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 89 - 31: 133 - 144. Aves, H.S. and Tappmeyer, D.M., 1985. The use of synthetic sonic logs derived from seismic data in the interpretation of stratigraphic variation in Cretaceous carbonates of the North Field area, Qatar. In: O.R. Berg and D.G. Woolverton (Editors), Seismic Stratigraphy 11: An Integrated Approach to Hydrocarbon Exploration. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 39:241 - 253. Back, W., Hanshaw, B.B., Herman, J.S. and Van Driel, J.J., 1986. Differential dissolution of a Pleistocene reef in the groundwater mixing zone of coastal Yucatan, Mexico. Geology, 14: 1 3 7 - 140. Back, W., Hanshaw, B.B., Pyle, T.E., Plummer, L.N. and Weidie,A.E., 1979. Geochemical significance of groundwater discharge and carbonate solution to the formation of Caleta Xel Ha, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Water Resources Res., 15:1531 - 1535. Bakalowicz, M.J., Ford, D.C., Miller, T.E., Palmer, A.N. and Palmer, M.V., 1987. Thermal genesis of dissolution caves in the Black Hills, South Dakota. Bull. Geol. Soc. America, 99: 7 2 9 - 738. Balint, V. and Pach, F., 1984. Depletion experiences and modeling of mixed-porosity, fractured, cavernous reservoirs in Hungary. Soc. Petrol. Engineers, Preprint, 13186, 11 pp. Bardossy, G., 1989. Bauxites. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 399 - 4 1 8 . Bardossy, G. and Kordos, L., 1989. Paleokarst of Hungary. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co.,Amsterdam, pp. 1 3 7 - 153. Bardossy, G., Fuchs, Y. and Glazek, J., 1989. Iron ore deposits in paleokarst. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 419 - 429. Bebout, D.G. and Loucks, R.G., 1974. Stuart City Trend, Lower Cretaceous, south Texas. Bur. Econ. Geology, University of Texas-Austin, Rep. Investigations, 78:80 pp. Bebout, D.G. and Pendexter, C., 1975. Secondary carbonate porosity as related to Early Tertiary depositional facies, Zelten Field, Libya. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 59:665 - 6 9 3 . Bliefnick, D.M., 1992. Karst-related diagenesis and reservoir development in the Arbuckle Group, Paschall #2 core, Wilburton Field, Oklahoma. In: M.P. Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors),Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examplesfrom Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 3 3 : 137-152. Bliefnick, D.M. and Belfield, W.C., 1991. The OrdovicianArbuckle Group of Oklahoma- a karsted dolomite reservoir. In: A. Bosellini et al. (Editors), Abstracts, Dolomieu Conference on Carbonate Plat-
857
forms and Dolomitization, Ortisei/St. Ulrich, Italy, pp. 17 - 18. Bocker, T. and Vizy, B., 1989. Hydrogeological problems of Hungarian bauxite and coal deposits. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 533 - 548. Bogli, J., 1980. Karst Hydrology and Physical Speleology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 285 pp. Bois, C., Bouche, P. and Pelet, R., 1982. Global geologic history and distribution of hydrocarbon reserves. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 66: 1248- 1270. Bosak, P., 1989a. Clays and sands in paleokarst. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 431 442. Bosak, P., 1989b. Problems of the origin and fossilization ofkarst forms. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 5 7 7 - 598. Bosak, P., Ford, D.C., Glazek, J. and Horacek, I., 1989a. Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 725 pp. Bosak, P., Ford, D.C. and Glazek, J., 1989b. Terminology. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co.,Amsterdam, pp. 25 - 32. Bourrouilh-Le Jan, F.G., 1989. The oceanic karsts: modem bauxite and phosphate ore deposits on the high carbonate islands (so-called "uplifted atolls") of the Pacific Ocean. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors),Paleokarst: Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ Co.,Amsterdam, pp. 4 4 3 - 4 7 1 . Bouvier, J.D., Gevers, E.C.A. and Wigley, P.L., 1990.3-D seismic interpretation and lateral prediction of the Amposta Marino Field (Spanish Mediterranean Sea). Geol. Mijnbouw, 6 9 : 1 0 5 - 120. Brady, T.J., Campbell, N.D.J. and Maher, C.E., 1980. Intisar "D" oil field, Libya. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade: 1968-1978. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 30:543 - 564. Brown, A.R., 1985. The role of horizontal seismic sections in stratigraphic interpretation. In: O.R. Berg and D.G. Woolverton (Editors), Seismic Stratigraphy 11: An Integrated Approach to Hydrocarbon Exploration. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 3 9 : 3 7 - 4 7 . Candelaria, M.P. and Reed, C.L. (Editors), 1992. Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 33:202 pp. Canter, K.L., Wheeler, D.M. and Geesaman, R.C., 1992. Sequence stratigraphy and depositional facies of the Siluro-Devonian interval of the northern Permian Basin. In: M.P. Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors), Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 3 3 : 9 3 - 109. Carpenter, B.N. and Evans, M.E., 1991. Comparison of the Arbuckle Group at Wilburton Field, Latimer County, with N.E. Alden Field, Caddo County, Oklahoma. In: K.S. Johnson (Editor), Arbuckle Group Core Workshop and Field Trip. Oklahoma Geol. Survey, Spec. Publ., 91 - 3:111 - 132. Catacosinos, P.A., Daniels, P.A. and Harrison, W.B., 1990. Structure, stratigraphy, and petroleum geology of the Michigan Basin. In: M.W. Leighton, D.R. Kolata, D.F. Oltz and J.J. Eidel (Editors), Interior Cratonic Basins; Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 51:561 - 6 0 2 . Chenowith, P.A., 1972. Unconformity traps. In: R.E. King (Editor),Stratigraphic Oil and Gas Fields.Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 16: 4 2 - 4 6 . Choquette, P.W. and James, N.P., 1988. Introduction. In: N.P. James and P.W. Choquette (Editors), Paleokarst. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1 - 21. Choquette, P.W. and Pray, L.C., 1970. Geological nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 54: 2 0 7 - 250. Coogan, A.H., Bebout, D.G. and Maggio, C., 1972. Depositional environments and geological history of Golden Lane and Poza Rica trends, Mexico, an alternative view. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 56: 1 4 1 9 - 1447. Craig, D.H., 1988. Caves and other features of Permian karst in SanAndres Dolomite, Yates Field reservoir, west Texas. In: N.P. James and P.W. Choquette (Editors), Paleokarst. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 342-363. Craig, D.H., Mruk, D.H., Heymans, M.J., Crevello, P.D. and Lanz, R.C., 1986. Stratigraphy and reservoir
858
geology of the San Andres Dolomite, Yates Field, West Texas. In: D.G. Bebout and P.M. Harris (Editors), Hydrocarbon Reservoir Studies, San Andres/Grayburg Formations, Permian Basin. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 8 6 - 2 6 : 1 3 9 - 143. Daniel, E.J., 1954. Fractured reservoirs of Middle East. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 38: 7 7 4 815. DeHaas, R.J. and Jones, M.W., 1988. Cave levels of the Trenton-Black River Formations in central southern Michigan. In: B.D. Keith (Editor), The Trenton Group (Upper Ordovician Series) of Eastern North America. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Studies in Geology, 29: 2 3 7 - 266. DeMille, G., Shouldice, J.R. and Nelson, H.W., 1964. Collapse structures related to evaporites of the Prairie Formation, Saskatchewan. Bull. Geol. Soc. America, 75: 3 0 7 - 316. Dolly, E.D. and Busch, D.A., 1972. Stratigraphic, structural, and geomorphologic factors controlling oil accumulation in Upper Cambrian strata of central Ohio. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 56:2335 - 2368. Dublyansky, V.N., 1980. Hydrothermal karst in the alpine folded belt of southern parts of U.S.S.R. Kras i Speleologia (Poland), 3(12): 1 8 - 36. Dussert, P., Santoro, G. and Soudet, H., 1988. A decade of drilling developments pays off in offshore Italian oil field. Oil & Gas Journal, Feb. 29:33 - 39. Dzulynski, S. and Sass-Gustkiewicz, M., 1989. Pb-Zn ores. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors),Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co.,Amsterdam, pp. 377-397. Ebanks, W.J., Euwer, R.M. and Nodine-Zeller, D.E., 1977. Mississippian combination trap, Bindley Field, Hodgeman County, Kansas. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 6 l: 309 - 330. Edie, R.W., 1958. Mississippian sedimentation and oil fields in southeastern Saskatchewan. In: A.G. Goodman (Editor), Jurassic and Carboniferous of Western Canada. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, John Andrew Allen Memorial Volume, pp. 331 - 363. Egemeier, S.J., 1981. Cavern development by thermal waters. Bull. Nat. Speleolog. Society, 4 3 : 3 1 - 51. Enos, P., 1977. Tamabra Limestone of the Poza Rica Trend, Cretaceous, Mexico. In: H.E. Cook and P. Enos (Editors), Deep-Water Carbonate Environments. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Spec. Publ., 25:273 -314. Entzminger, D.J. and Loucks, R.G., 1992. Paleocave reservoirs in the Wristen Formation at Emerald Field, Gaines and Yoakum Counties, Texas. In: M.P. Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors), Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 33: 1 2 6 - 130. Esteban, M., 1991. Palaeokarst: practical applications (chapter 3) and case histories. In: V.P. Wright, M. Esteban and P.L. Smart (Editors), Palaeokarsts and Palaeokarstic Reservoirs. Postgraduate Research Institute for Sedimentology, University of Reading, pp. 8 9 - 146. Esteban, M. and Klappa, C.F., 1983. Subaerial exposure environments. In: P.A. Scholle, D.G. Bebout and C.H. Moore (Editors), Carbonate Depositional Environments. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 33:1 - 54. Fanning, K.A., Byme, R.H., Breland, J.A. and Betzer, P.R., 1981. Geothermal springs of the West Florida continental shelf: evidence for dolomitization and radionuclide enrichment. Earth Planet. Sci. Letters, 52:345 - 354. Fontaine, J.M. Cussey, R., Lacaze, J., Lanaud, R. and Yapaudijan, L., 1987. Seismic interpretation of carbonate depositional environments. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 71: 281 - 297. Ford, D.C., 1988. Characteristics ofdissolutional cave systems in carbonate rocks. In: N.P. James and P.W. Choquette (Editors), Paleokarst. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 25 - 57. Ford, D.C. and Williams, P.W., 1989.Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology. Unwin Hyman, London, 601 PP. Fritz, M., 1991. "It's all there" in the Knox Play. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists Explorer, Feb. 1991, p. 1. Fuchs, Y., 1989. Paleokarst-related uranium deposits. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 473 480. Fuller, J.G.C.M. and Porter, J.W., 1969. Evaporite formations with petroleum reservoirs in Devonian and Mississippian of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and North Dakota. Bull Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 53: 9 0 9 - 926.
859
Garcia-Sineriz, B., Querol, R., Castillo, F. and Arribas, J.R.E, 1980. A new hydrocarbon province in the western Mediterranean. l Oth World Petrol. Congress, Proceedings, 2:191 - 197. Garfield, T.R. and Longman, M.W., 1989. Depositional variations in the Fusselman Formation, central Midland Basin, West Texas. In: B.K. Cunningham and D.W. Cromwell (Editors), The Lower Paleozoic of West Texas and Southern New Mexico- Modern Exploration Concepts. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 89 - 31:187 - 202. Gatewood, L.E., 1970. Oklahoma City Field-anatomy of a giant. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), Geology of Giant Petroleum Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 14:223 - 254. Geesaman, R.C. and Scott,A.J., 1989. Stratigraphy, lithofacies, and depositional models of the Fusselman Formation, central Midland Basin. In: B.K. Cunningham and D.W. Cromwell (Editors), The Lower Paleozoic of West Texas and Southern New Mexico- Modern Exploration Concepts. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 8 9 - 31:175 - 186. Gill, D., 1985. Depositional facies of Middle Silurian (Niagaran) pinnacle reefs, Belle River Mills Gas Field, Michigan Basin, southeastern Michigan. In: P.O. Roehl and P.W. Choquette (Editors), Carbonate Petroleum Reservoirs. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 121 - 139. Glazek, J., 1989a. Paleokarst of Poland. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 7 7 - 105. Glazek, J., 1989b. Tectonic conditions for karst origin and preservation. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek, and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 5 6 9 - 575. Guangming, Z. and Quanheng, Z., 1982. Buried-hill oil and gas pools in the North China Basin. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), The Deliberate Search for the Subtle Trap.Am.Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 32: 317-335. Guzman, E.J., 1967. Reef type stratigraphic traps in Mexico. 7th World Petrol. Congress Proceedings, 2: 461 - 4 7 0 . Halbouty, M.T., 1972. Rationale for deliberate pursuit of stratigraphic, unconformity, and paleogeomorphic traps. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 56: 5 3 7 - 541. Han, B., 1990. The study of oil field karst. 11th Friends of Karst, April 5 - 7 (Decorah, Iowa), Geol. and Geog. Sect. Natl. Speleological Society, 17(2 and 3): 60. Hanshaw, B.B. and Back, W., 1980. Chemical mass-wasting of the northern Yucatan Peninsula by groundwater dissolution. Geology, 8: 2 2 2 - 224. Harris, P.M. and Frost, S.H., 1984. Middle Cretaceous carbonate reservoirs, Fahud Field and northwestern Oman. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 68: 6 4 9 - 658. Hams, P.M., Flynn, P.E. and Sieverding, J.L., 1988. Mission Canyon (Mississippian) reservoir study, Whitney Canyon-Carter Creek Field, southwestern Wyoming. In: A.J. Lomando and P.M. Harris (Editors), Giant Oil and Gas Fields, A Core Workshop. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Core Workshop, 12: 6 9 5 - 740. Harvey, R.L., 1972. West Campbell (Northeast Cedardale) Gas Field, Major County, Oklahoma. In: R.E. King (Editor), Stratigraphic Oil and Gas Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 16:568 - 678. Henderson, K.S. and Knox, S.C., 1991. Hydrocarbon potential and subsurface stratigraphy of the CambroOrdovician sequence, Black Warrior Basin of Mississippi. In: K.S. Johnson (Editor), Arbuckle Group Core Workshop and Field Trip. Oklahoma Geol. Survey, Spec. Publ., 91 - 3:181 - 184. Hill, C.A., 1990. Sulfuric acid speleogenesis of Carlsbad Cavern and its relationship to hydrocarbons. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 74:1685 - 1694. Hill, C.A., 1992. Sulfuric acid oil-field karst. In: M.P. Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors), Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 33: 1 9 2 - 194. Holtz, M.H. and Kerans, C., 1992. Characterization and categorization of west Texas Ellenburger reservoirs. In: M.P. Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors), Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata o f West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 92 - 33:45 - 54. Hook, R.C., 1990. Recent developments at Wilburton Field, Latimer County, Oklahoma. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 74: 677. Hovorka, S.D. and Ruppel, S.C., 1990. Controls on porosity evolution in Devonian cherts of west Texas. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 74: 678. Ijirigho, B.T. and Schreiber, J.F., 1988. Composite classification of fractured and brecciated carbonate
860
r o c k s - examples from the Ordovician Ellenburger Group, west Texas. dr. Petrol. Geology, 11:193 204. Illing, L.V., Wood, G.V. and J.G.C.M. Fuller, 1967. Reservoir rocks and stratigraphic traps in non-reef carbonates. 7th Worm Petrol. Congress Proceedings, 2 : 4 8 7 - 4 9 9 . James, N.P. and Choquette, P.W., 1984. Diagenesis 9. Limestones-the meteoric diagenetic environment. Geoscience Canada, 11: 161 - 194. James, N.P. and Choquette, P.W. (Editors), 1988. Paleokarst. Springer-Verlag, New York, 416 pp. Jennings, J.N., 1971. Karst. Mass. Inst. Technology Press, Cambridge, 252 pp. Jenyon, M.K., 1984. Seismic response to collapse structures in the southern North Sea. Mar. and Petrol. Geology, 1:27 - 36. Jodry, R.L., 1969. Growth and dolomitization of Silurian reefs, St. Clair County, Michigan. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 53: 9 5 7 - 981. Johnson, K.S. (Editor), 1991. Arbuckle Group Core Workshop and Field Trip. Oklahoma Geol. Survey, Spec. Publ., 91 - 3, 191 pp. Jordan, C.F., Connally, T.C. and Vest, H.A., 1985. Middle Cretaceous carbonates of the Mishrif Formation, Fateh Field, offshore Dubai, U.A.E.. In: P.O. Roehl and P.W. Choquette (Editors), Carbonate Petroleum Reservoirs. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 4 2 6 - 442. Kent, D.M., Haidl, F.M. and MacEachern, J.A., 1988. Mississippian oilfields in the northem Williston Basin. In: S.M. Goolsby and M.W. Longman (Editors), Occurrence and Petrophysical Properties of Carbonate Reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain Region. Rocky Mount. Assoc. Geologists, pp. 381-418. Kerans, C., 1988. Karst-controlled reservoir heterogeneity in Ellenburger Group carbonates of West Texas. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 72:1160 - 1183. Kerans, C., 1989. Karst-controlled reservoir heterogeneity and an example from the Ellenburger (Lower Ordovician) of West Texas. Bur. Econ. Geology, University of Texas-Austin, Rep. Investigations, 186: 40 pp. Kerans, C., 1991. Description and interpretation ofkarst-related breccia fabrics, Ellenburger Group, west Texas. In: K.S. Johnson (Editor), ArbucMe Group Core Workshop and Field Trip. Oklahoma Geol. Survey, Spec. Publ., 91 - 3:145 - 156. Kerans, C. and Parsley, M.J., 1986. Depositional facies and porosity evolution in a karst-modified San Andres reservoir, Taylor Link West SanAndres, Pecos County, Texas. In: D.G. Bebout and P.M. Harris (Editors), Hydrocarbon Reservoir Studies, San Andres/Grayburg Formations, Permian Basin. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 8 6 - 2 6 : 1 3 3 - 134. Khutorov, A.M., 1958. The formation of secondary oil deposits in the Fergana depression. Geologiya Nefti i Gaza, 2, 7B: 6 4 3 - 651. Kruger, J.M., 1992. Diagenesis and porosity development beneath the pre-Kaskaskia (Early Devonian) interregional unconformity, northwest Illinois Basin. In: M.P. Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors), Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 92 - 33: 182 - 191. Kupecz, J.A., 1992. Sequence boundary control on hydrocarbon reservoir development, Ellenburger Group, Texas. In: M.P. Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors), Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-DevonianAge Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 33:55 - 5 8 . Kyle, J.R., 1983. Economic aspects of subaerial carbonates. In: P.A. Scholle, D.G. Bebout and C.H. Moore (Editors), Carbonate Depositional Environments. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mere., 33:73 - 92. Ladwein, H.W., 1988. Organic geochemistry of Vienna Basin: model for hydrocarbon generation in overthrust belts. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 72: 5 8 6 - 599. Latham, J.W., 1970. Petroleum geology of Healdton Field, Carter County, Oklahoma. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), Geology of Giant Petroleum Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mere., 14:255 - 276. Levorsen, A.I., 1936. Stratigraphic versus structural accumulation. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 20:521 - 530. Levorsen, A.I., 1967. Geology of Petroleum (2nd Edition). W.H. Freeman and Co., 724 pp. Li, M., Taisheng, G., Xueping, Z., Taijun, Z., Rong, G. and Zhenrong, D., 1982. Oil basins and subtle traps in the eastern part of China. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), The Deliberate Search for the Subtle Trap. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 32: 2 8 7 - 315. Loucks, R.G. and Anderson, J.H., 1985. Depositional facies, diagenetic terranes, and porosity develop-
861
ment in Lower Ordovician Ellenburger Dolomite, Puckett Field, West Texas. In: EO. Roehl and EW. Choquette (Editors), Carbonate Petroleum Reservoirs. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1 9 - 38. Loucks, R.G. and Handford, C.R., 1992. Origin and recognition of fractures, breccias, and sediment fills in paleocave-reservoir networks. In: M.P. Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors), Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 33:31 44. Lowenstam, H.A., 1948. Marine Pool, Madison County, Illinois, Silurian reef producer. In: J.V. Howell (Editor), Structure of Typical American Oil Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Symp., 3:153 - 189. Lynch, M. and A1-Shaieb, Z., 1991. Paleokarstic features and thermal overprints observed in some of the Arbuckle cores in Oklahoma. In: K.S. Johnson (Editor), Arbuckle Group Core Workshop and Field Trip. Oklahoma Geol. Survey, Spec. Publ., 91 - 3 : 3 1 - 6 8 . Maksimovich, G.A. and Bykov, V.N., 1978. Karst of carbonate oil- and gas-bearing formations. Perm' Univ. Press, Perm', Russia, 96 pp. Marafi, H., 1972. Newburg-South Westhope oil field, North Dakota. In: R.E. King (Editor),Stratigraphic Oil and Gas Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 16:633 - 6 4 0 . Martin, R., 1964. Buried hills hold key to new Mississippian pay in Canada. Oil & Gas Journal, Oct. 19: 1 5 8 - 162. Martin, R., 1966. Paleogeomorphology and its application to exploration for oil and gas (with examples from western Canada). Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 50:2277 - 2311. Martinez del Olmo, W. and Esteban, M., 1983. Paleokarst development. In: EA. Scholle, D.G. Bebout and C.H. Moore (Editors), Carbonate Depositional Environments.Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 33: 93-95. Maslov, V.E, 1945. To the question of phases of deposition and karstification of buried massifs of Ishimbay. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geol., pp. 8 8 - 100. Mazzullo, L.J., 1990a. Fusselman paleotopographic trap search pays off in the Midland Basin. Oil & Gas Journal, Oct. 1 : 9 8 - 102. Mazzullo, L.J., 1990b. Implications of sub-Woodford geologic variations in the exploration for SilurianDevonian reservoirs in the Permian Basin. In: J.E. Flis and R.C. Price (Editors),Permian Basin Oil and Gas Fields: Innovative Ideas in Exploration and Development. West Texas Geol. Society, Publ., 9 0 87: 2 9 - 4 2 . Mazzullo, L.J., Mazzullo, S.J. and Durham. T.E., 1989. Geologic controls on reservoir development in Silurian and Devonian carbonates, northern Midland Basin, Texas. In: B.K. Cunningham and D.W. Cromwell (Editors), The Lower Paleozoic of West Texas and Southern New Mexico-Modern Exploration Concepts. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 89 - 31:209 - 218. Mazzullo, S.J., 1985. Pennsylvanian facies-diagenetic reservoir, Lower Strawn Formation, Seminole Southeast Field, Midland Basin, West Texas. In: EO. Roehl and EW. Choquette (Editors), Carbonate Petroleum Reservoirs. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 2 2 7 - 238. Mazzullo, S.J., 1986. Stratigraphic approaches to hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation. Geol. J., 21: 265-281. Mazzullo, S.J., 1989a. Formational and zonal subdivisions of the Ellenburger Group (Lower Ordovician), southern Midland Basin, Texas. In: B.K. Cunningham and D.W. Cromwell (Editors), The Lower Paleozoic of West Texas and Southern New Mexico- Modern Exploration Concepts. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 89 - 31: 113 - 121. Mazzullo, S.J., 1989b. Subtle traps in Ordovician to Permian carbonate petroleum reservoirs, Permian Basin: an overview. In: J.E. Flis, R.C. Price and J.F. Sarg (Editors), Search for the Subtle Trap, Hydrocarbon Exploration in Mature Basins. West Texas Geol. Society, Publ., 8 9 - 8 5 : 1 5 5 - 180. Mazzullo, S.J., 1990. Karst-controlled reservoir heterogeneity in Ellenburger Group carbonates of West Texas: discussion. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 74: 1119- 1123. Mazzullo, S.J. and Chilingarian, G.V., 1992. Diagenesis and origin of porosity (chapter 4). In: G.V. Chilingarian, S.J. Mazzullo and H.H. Rieke (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: A Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part L Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam: 1 9 9 - 270. Mazzullo, S.J. and Harris, EM., 1992. Mesogenetic dissolution: its role in porosity development in carbonate reservoirs. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 76:607 - 620. Mazzullo, S.J. and Mazzullo, L.J., 1992. Paleokarst and karst-associated hydrocarbon reservoirs in the Fusselman Formation, West Texas, Permian Basin. In: M.P. Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors),
862
Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from OrdovicianDevonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 33: 110- 120. Mazzullo, S.J. and Reid, A.M., 1986. Belize, Central America: geologic models for certain Paleozoic reservoirs in the Permian Basin. Bull. West Texas Geol. Society, 25(6): 4 - 11. McCaleb, J.A., 1988. Significance ofpaleokarst on petroleum recovery, Elk Basin Field, Big Horn Basin. In: S.M. Goolsby and M.W. Longman (Editors), Occurrence and Petrophysical Properties of Carbonate Reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain Region. Rocky Mount. Assoc. Geologists, pp. 1 3 9 - 147. McCaleb, J.A. and Wayhan, D.A., 1969. Geologic reservoir analysis, Mississippian Madison Formation, Elk Basin Field, Wyoming-Montana. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 53: 2094-2113. Mear, C.E., 1989a. Ellenburger reservoir development at Midland Farms and Inez Fields,Andrews County, Texas. In: B.K. Cunningham and D.W. Cromwell (Editors), The Lower Paleozoic of West Texas and Southern New M e x i c o - Modern Exploration Concepts. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 89 - 31:169 - 174. Mear, C.E., 1989b. Fusselman reservoir development at Flying W Field, Winkler County, Texas. In: B.K. Cunningham and D.W. Cromwell (Editors), The Lower Paleozoic of West Texas and Southern New Mexico- Modern Exploration Concepts. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 8 9 31:203 - 207. Mear, C.E. and Dufurrena, C.K., 1984. Pre-Leonardian geology of Midland Farms Field area, Andrews County, Texas. In: G. Moore and G. Wilde (Editors), Trans. Southwest Sect. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Publ., 8 4 - 78 of the West Texas Geol. Society, pp. 111 - 123. Mesolella, K.J., Robinson, J.D., McCormick, L.M. and Ormiston, A.R., 1974. Cyclic deposition of Silurian carbonates and evaporites in Michigan Basin. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 58: 3 4 - 62. Mitchum, R.M. and Uliana, M.A., 1985. Seismic stratigraphy of carbonate depositional sequences, Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous, Neuquen Basin, Argentina. In: O.R. Berg and D.G. Woolverton (Editors), Seismic Stratigraphy II: An Integrated Approach to Hydrocarbon Exploration. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 39:255 - 274. Moody, J.D., Mooney, L.W. and Spirak, J., 1970. Giant oil fields of North America. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), Geology of Giant Petroleum Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 14: 8 - 17. Muller, P., 1989. Hydrothermal paleokarst of Hungary. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 155 163. Mussman, W.J. and Read, J.E, 1986. Sedimentology and development of a passive to convergent margin unconformity-Middle Ordovician Knox unconformity, VirginiaAppalachian. Bull. Geol. Soc. America, 97:282 - 295. Nadon, G.C. and Smith, G.L., 1992. Identification of subaerial unconformities in the subsurface- an example from the Lower-Middle Ordovician of the central Michigan Basin. In: M.P. Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors), Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 33:153 - 164. Newell, K.D., Watney, W.L., Cheng, S.W.L. and Brownrigg, R.L., 1987. Stratigraphic and spatial distribution of oil and gas production in Kansas. Kansas Geol. Survey, Subsurface Geology Series, 9:86 pp. Palmer, A.N., 1984, Geomorphic interpretation ofkarst features. In: R.G. LaFleur (Editor), Groundwater as a Geomorphic Agent. Allen & Unwin, Winchester, Mass., pp. 1 7 5 - 209. Palmer, A.N., 1991. Origin and morphology of limestone caves. Bull. Geol. Soc. America, 103:1 - 2 1 . Palmer, M.V. and Palmer, A.N., 1989, Paleokarst of the United States. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 3 3 7 - 363. Pasternack, I., 1988. Nature and distribution of Mississippian Sun River Dolomite porosity, west flank of the Sweetgrass Arch, northwestern Montana. In: S.M. Goolsby and M.W. Longman (Editors), Occurrence and Petrophysical Properties of Carbonate Reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain Region. Rocky Mount. Assoc. Geologists, pp. 1 2 9 - 138. Payton, C.E., 1977. Seismic Stratigraphy-Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 26:516 pp. Qi, F. and Xie-Pei, W., 1984. Significant role of structural fractures in Renqiu buried-hill oil field in eastern China. Bull Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 68:971 - 982.
863
Quanheng, Z., 1984. Jizhong Depression, China- its geologic framework, evolutionary history, and distribution of hydrocarbons. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 68:983 - 992. Rao, R.P. and Talukdar, S.N., 1980. Petroleum geology of Bombay High Field, India. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade: 1968-1978. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 30: 4 8 7 - 506. Raymond, D.E. and Osborne, W.E., 1991. Stratigraphy and exploration of the Knox Group in the Appalachian field and thrust belt and Black Warrior Basin of Alabama. In: K.S. Johnson (Editor), Arbuckle Group Core Workshop and Field Trip. Oklahoma Geol. Survey, Spec. Publ., 91 - 3:163 - 180. Read, D.L. and Zogg, W.D., 1988. Description and origin of the Devonian dolomite oil reservoir, Grant Canyon Field, Nye County, Nevada. In: S.M. Goolsby and M.W. Longman (Editors), Occurrence and Petrophysical Properties of Carbonate Reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain Region. Rocky Mount.Assoc. Geologists: 2 2 9 - 240. Reid,A.M. and Mazzullo, S.J., 1988. Paint Rock and Paint Rock Southwest Fields, Concho County, Texas: Strawn analogs of modem shelf island systems. Bull. West Texas Geol. Society, 27, 8:5 - 10. Reid, A.M. and Reid, S.A.T., 1991. The Cogdell Field study, Kent and Scurry Counties, Texas: a postmortem. In: M. Candelaria (Editor), Permian Basin Plays, Tomorrow's Technology Today. West Texas Geol. Society, Publ., 9 1 - 89: 3 9 - 66. Reid, A., Reid, S.A.T. and Mosley, M.A., 1991. Late Strawn and Early Canyon highstand and lowstand shelf edges and reefs on the Eastern Shelf with examples from Schleicher and Tom Green Counties, Texas. In: M. Candelaria (Editor), Permian Basin Plays: Tomorrow's Technology Today; West Texas Geol. Society, Publ., 91 - 89:118 - 119. Reid, A.M., Reid, S.A. and Mazzullo, S.J., 1990. Lowstand carbonate reservoirs: Upper Pennsylvanian sea level changes and reservoir development adjoining Horseshoe Atoll. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 74: 221. Rittenhouse, G., 1972. Stratigraphic-trap classification. In: R.E. King (Editor),Stratigraphic Oil and Gas Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 16: 1 4 - 28. Roehl, P.O., 1967. Stony Mountain (Ordovician) and Interlake (Silurian) facies analogs of Recent lowenergy marine and subaerial carbonates, Bahamas. Bull Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 51: 1 9 7 9 2032. Roehl, P.O., 1985. Depositional and diagenetic controls on reservoir rock development and petrophysics in Silurian tidalites, Interlake Formation, Cabin Creek Field area, Montana. In: P.O. Roehl and P.W. Choquette (Editors), Carbonate Petroleum Reservoirs. Spinger-Verlag, New York, pp. 85 - 105. Roehl, P.O. and Choquette, P.W. (Editors), 1985. Carbonate Petroleum Reservoirs. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 622 pp. Rose, P.R., 1972. Edwards Group, surface and subsurface, central Texas. Bur. Econ. Geology, University of Texas-Austin, Rep. Investigations, 74:198 pp. Sailer, A.H., Van Horn, D., Miller, J.A. and Guy, B.T., 1991. Reservoir geology of Devonian carbonates and c h e r t - implications for tertiary recovery, Dollarhide Field, Andrews County, Texas. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 75:86 - 107. Sando, W.J., 1988. Madison Limestone (Mississippian) paleokarst, a geologic synthesis. In: N.P. James and P.W. Choquette (Editors), Paleokarst. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 2 5 6 - 277. Sangster, D.F., 1988. Breccia-hosted lead-zinc deposits in carbonate rocks. In: N.P. James and P.W. Choquette (Editors), Paleokarst. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 102 - 116. Santiago-Acevedo, J., 1980. Giant fields of the southern zone, Mexico. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade: 1968-1978. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 30: 3 3 9 - 385. Shirley, K., 1988. Deeper zone rejuvenates old basin - Oklahoma Arbuckle targeted. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists Explorer, 9 : 1 0 - 13. Shouyue, Z., 1989. Paleokarst of China. In: P. Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 297 - 311. Sieverding, J.L. and Harris, P.M., 1991. Mixed carbonates and siliciclastics in a Mississippian paleokarst setting, southwestern Wyoming thrust belt. In: A.J. Lomando, A.J. and P.M. Harris (Editors), Mixed Carbonate-Siliciclastic Sequences. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Core Workshop, 15:541 - 568. Smart, P.L. and Whitaker, F.F., 1991. Karst processes, hydrology and porosity evolution. In: V.P. Wright, M. Esteban and P.L. Smart (Editors), Palaeokarsts and Palaeokarstic Reservoirs. Postgraduate Research Institute for Sedimentology, University of Reading, pp. 1 - 55. Smith, D.G. and Pullen, J.R., 1967. Hummingbird structure of southeast Saskatchewan. Bull. Canad.
864
Petrol. Geologists, 15:468 - 482. Stoessell, R.K., Ward, W.C., Ford, B.D. and Schuffert, J.D., 1989. Water chemistry and CaCO 3 dissolution in the saline part of the open-flow mixing zone, coastal Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Bull. Geol. Soc. America, 101: 1 5 9 - 169. Stormont, D.H., 1949. Huge cavems encountered in Dollarhide Field make for unusual drilling conditions. Oil & Gas Journal, April 7: 6 6 - 6 8 , 94. Thrailkill, J., 1968. Chemical and hydrologic factors in the excavation of limestone caves.Bull. Geol. Soc. America, 79:19 - 46. Troschinetz, J., 1992a.An example ofkarsted Silurian reservoir: Buckwheat Field, Howard County, Texas. In: M.E Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors), Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 92 - 33:131 - 133. Troschinetz, J., 1992b. Paleokarst reservoir in Crittendon (Silurian) Field, Winkler County, Texas. In: M.E Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors), Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 33: 1 3 4 - 136. Tschopp, R.H., 1967. Development of the Fahud Field. 7th World Petrol. Congress, Proceedings, pp. 243 -250. Twombley, B.N. and Scott, J., 1975. Application of geological studies in the development of the Bu Hasa Field, Abu Dhabi. 9th Arab Petrol. Congress, Dubai, Paper, 133, B - 1:1 - 27. Tyskin, R.A., 1989. Paleokarst of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. In: E Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors), Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 253 - 295. Vail, ER., Mitchum, R.M. and Thompson, S., 1977. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level, part 2: the depositional sequence as a basin unit for stratigraphic analysis. In: C.E. Payton (Editor), Seismic Stratigraphy-Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration.Am.Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 26:53 - 62. Vandenberghe, N., Poggiagliolmi, E. and Watts, G., 1986. Offset-dependent seismic amplitudes from karst limestone in northern Belgium. First Break, 4: 9 - 27. Vernon, ED., 1969. The geology and hydrology associated with a zone of high permeability ("Boulder Zone") in Florida. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 40: 9 8 9 - 995. Verseput, T.S., 1989. Depositional setting of the Ellenburger Langley Field, Lea County, New Mexico. In: B.K. Cunningham and D.W. Cromwell (Editors), The Lower Paleozoic of West Texas and Southern New Mexico- Modern Exploration Concepts. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 8 9 - 3 1 : 1 4 5 - 157. Vest, E.L., 1970. Oil fields of the Pennsylvanian-Permian HorseshoeAtoll, west Texas. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), Geology of Giant Petroleum Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 1 4 : 1 8 5 - 203. Videtich, EE., McLimans, R.K., Watson, H.K.S. and Nagy, R.M., 1988. Depositional, diagenetic, thermal, and maturation histories of Cretaceous Mishrif Formation, Fateh Field, Dubai. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 72: 1143- 1159. Viniegra-O.E and Castillo-Tejero, C., 1970. Golden Lane fields, Veracruz, Mexico. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), Geology of Giant Petroleum Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 14: 3 0 9 - 325. Vysotskiy, I.V. (Editor), 1976. The Guide on Gas and Oil Deposits of Foreign Countries. Nedra, Moskva, TI: 600 pp., and T2:584 pp. Waddell, R.T., Liu, H. and Forgotson, J.M., 1991. Karst breccias of the Wade, Bray, and Brown Zones of the upper Arbuckle Group in the Healdton Field, Carter County, Oklahoma. In: K.S. Johnson (Editor), Arbuckle Group Core Workshop and FieM Trip. Oklahoma Geol. Survey, Spec. Publ., 91 - 3:185 189. Waiters, R.E, 1946. Buried pre-Cambrian hills in northeastern Barton County, central Kansas. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 30:660 - 710. Waiters, R.F., 1958. Differential entrapment of oil and gas in Arbuckle Dolomite of central Kansas. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 42: 2 1 3 3 - 2173. Waiters, R.F. and Price, A.S., 1948. Kraft-Prusa Field, Barton County, Kansas. In: J.V. Howell (Editor), Structure of Typical American Oil Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Syrup., 3: 2 4 9 - 2 8 0 . Wardlaw, N.C. and Reinson, G.E., 1971. Carbonate and evaporite deposition and diagenesis, Middle Devonian Winnipegosis and Prairie Evaporite formations of south-central Saskatchewan. Bull. Am.
865
Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 55: 1 7 5 9 - 1786. Watson, H.J., 1982. Casablanca Field offshore Spain, a paleogeomorphic trap. In: M.T. Halbouty (Editor), The Deliberate Search for the Subtle Trap. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 32:237 - 250. Whiting, L.L. and Stevenson, D.L., 1965. SangamonArch. Illinois State Geol. Survey, Circular, 383:20 PP. Wigley, EL., Bouvier, J.D. and Dawans, J.M., 1988. Karst and mixing-zone porosity in the Amposta Marino Field, offshore Spain. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 72:1031. Wilson, J.L., 1980a. A review of carbonate reservoirs. In: A.D. Miall (Editor), Facts and Principles of World Petroleum Occurrence. Canadian Soc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 6:95 - 115. Wilson, J.L., 1980b. Limestone and dolomite reservoirs. In: G.D. Hobson (Editor), Developments in Petroleum Geology, 2. Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London, pp. 1 - 51. Wilson, J.L., 1985. Petroleum reservoirs and karst. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Ann. Midyear Meeting, Abstracts, II: 9 7 - 98. Wilson, J.L., Fritz, R.D. and Medlock, EL., 1991. The Arbuckle Group - relationship of core and outcrop analyses to cyclic stratigraphy and correlation. In: K.S. Johnson (Editor), Arbuckle Group Core Workshop and Field Trip. Oklahoma Geol. Survey, Spec. Publ., 91 - 3:133 - 144. Wilson, J.L. Medlock, EL., Fritz, R.D., Canter, K.L. and Geesaman, R.G., 1992. A review of CambroOrdovician breccias in North America. In: M.E Candelaria and C.L. Reed (Editors),Paleokarst, Karst Related Diagenesis and Reservoir Development: Examples from Ordovician-Devonian Age Strata of West Texas and the Mid-Continent. Permian Basin Section Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Publ., 9 2 - 33: 19-29. Withrow, EC., 1972. Star-Lacey Field, Blaine and Kingfisher Counties, Oklahoma. In: R.E. King (Editor), Stratigraphic Oil and Gas Fields. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, Mem., 16: 5 2 0 - 531. Wright, V.E, 1991. Palaeokarst: types, recognition, controls and associations. In: V.P. Wright, M. Esteban and EL. Smart (Editors), Palaeokarsts and Palaeokarstic Reservoirs. Post-graduate Research Institute for Sedimentology, University of Reading, pp. 5 6 - 88. Wright, V.E, Esteban, M. and Smart, EL. (Editors), 1991. Palaeokarsts and Palaeokarstic Reservoirs. Postgraduate Research Institute for Sedimentology, University of Reading, 158 pp. Zhigan, Z., 1980. Karst types in China. Geo-Joumal, Wiesbaden, 4, 6:541 - 570. Zotl, J., 1989. Paleokarst as an important hydrogeological factor. In: E Bosak, D.C. Ford, J. Glazek and I. Horacek (Editors),Paleokarst: A Systematic and Regional Review. Elsevier Publ. Co.,Amsterdam, pp. 483 - 509.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
867
Chapter 10 FACTORS A F F E C T I N G OIL R E C O V E R Y F R O M C A R B O N A T E RESERV O I R S AND P R E D I C T I O N OF R E C O V E R Y N O R M A N C. WARDLAW
INTRODUCTION
This chapter reviews factors which affect oil recovery, and primary, secondary and tertiary recovery processes are considered. Emphasis is on examining the effects of pore structure and larger scale heterogeneities on oil recovery. The rock-pore part of the system (the "container") must be considered in the context of the effects of important fluid variables (viscosity, interfacial tension, density) and fluid-rock interaction (wettability). However, fluid phase behavior is not included. Examples used are mainly from carbonate reservoirs in Alberta, Western Canada. Many petrophysical properties are measured from cores or core plugs and have to be averaged at larger (reservoir grid-block) scales in order to be used in reservoir models. Methods of averaging and representing the effects of heterogeneity and scale are reviewed. Reservoir models provide the basis for simulating fluid displacement and production under a variety of imposed conditions, and are necessary for forecasting the rates and proportions of fluid recovery and for selecting optimal recovery schemes and patterns of well placement. Recovery of oil from a reservoir may be referred to as primary, secondary or tertiary. Primary recovery is recovery by natural depletion processes only, and includes oil recovered by natural water drive, solution-gas drive, gas cap expansion and gravity drainage. Secondary recovery involves injection of fluids, usually water or gas, in order to maintain reservoir pressure and to displace oil. Tertiary recovery refers to techniques applied after secondary recovery and includes injection of solvents, surfactants and polymers. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is used here to refer to artificially improved depletion processes and includes secondary and tertiary recovery processes (Energy Resources Conservation Board, 1986). Others have used a more restrictive definition of EOR for recovery of oil by the injection of materials not normally present in the reservoir (Lake, 1989). Such a definition would exclude from EOR waterflooding and all pressure maintenance processes. Local and regional variability of petrophysical properties (porosity, permeability, connate water saturation, residual oil saturation, etc.) are commonly related to depositional trends of different sediment types and/or diagenesis (Harbaugh, 1967; Moore, 1989). Thus, depositional trends and diagenesis may be useful in reservoir description, for optimal well placement and for prediction of oil recovery. For example, several of the Devonian stromatoporoid reefs in the Swan Hills area of Alberta have high porosity and permeability rocks near reef margins, and low porosity and permeability rocks in reef interiors where directional patterns of porosity may be related to depositional patterns (Jardine and Wilshart, 1982). The Westerose reef, a stromatoporoid reef of Devonian age in Alberta, also has
868 porosity and permeability distribution related to reef morphology but here, the highest porosity and permeability rocks are in the lower portions of the reef interior (McNamara and Wardlaw, 1991). The Westerose reef is elongate and is little more than 1 km wide compared with over 10 km for the Judy Creek field in the Swan Hills area, Alberta. The lack of a well-developed back-reef facies at Westerose may be related to the narrowness of the reef structure and the consequent lack of space to accommodate wave-sheltered environments. Thus, although petrophysical properties are related to depositional sediment patterns, these relationships may vary from reef to reef depending on local conditions at the time of deposition and among sedimentary facies and subsequent diagenetic events. In some cases, sediments which have the highest porosity and permeability at the time of deposition are transformed during diagenesis to rocks with the lowest porosity and permeability, and vice versa. Such porosity reversals resulting from diagenesis are common. Well-sorted, coarse, crinoid-rich sediments with original high inter-fragmental porosity, for example, may be completely occluded with calcite cement during early diagenesis, whereas poorly sorted carbonates with finegrained matrices and lower primary porosities may resist early cementation and later be replaced partially by dolomite. Subsequent dissolution of residual calcite in this dolomite may then create substantial porosity. An example of this type of porosity, from the Mississippian of Western Canada, has been described by Thomas and Glaister (1960). A somewhat similar case of dissolution of calcite following dolomitization is reported by Lucia and Murray (1967) from the Mississippian Harmattan field, Alberta, which is producing from a dolomite formed by the selective dolomitization of mud matrix in a crinoidal sediment. They also observed that in the Turner Valley Formation, exposed at Moose Mountain, Alberta, dolomite distribution is controlled by distribution of lime mud. Those limestones which contain less than 15% dolomite were deposited as mud-free carbonate sands, where powerful local tidal currents probably were instrumental in removing lime mud. Selectivity of dolomitization may be related to the greater reactivity of fine-grained sediment relative to more coarsely crystalline material such as crinoid debris. In summary, although petrophysical properties such as original porosity and permeability are extensively altered during diagenesis, spatial patterns of rocks with distinctive petrophysical properties commonly are related to patterns of different sediment types within the original environments of deposition. It follows that reconstruction of depositional patterns is valuable in making reservoir models of reservoir flow units. These models are essential for history matching of reservoir production and for predictions of future reservoir performance and ultimate recovery.
PRIMARY RECOVERY
Primary recovery is driven by potential energy sources within the reservoir which move oil to the wellbore. These include the energies of expansion of free gas in a gas cap or of solution gas dissolved in the oil or water, as well as expansion of oil, water and rock as pressure declines. Gravitational energy of the oil acting over the vertical
869 distances of the productive column also may contribute to the driving energy (Chilingar et al., 1972, p. 266). Solution-gas drive, gas-cap expansion drive, water drive and gravity drainage are major drive mechanisms and give rise to characteristic pressure decline and oil, water and gas production curves (Chilingar et al., 1972). Rock and fluid compressibilities, fluid phase behavior, and the extent of communication with contiguous water zones all are of major importance to pressure decline rates and to primary oil recovery. Primary recovery is not as sensitive to pore structure as is EOR and is not considered further here except to provide an example of the importance of contiguous water to the duration and extent of primary production. Judy Creek and Redwater fields are both in carbonate stromatoporoid reefs of Upper Devonian age in Alberta. They have generally similar internal patterns of reservoir facies with the more productive reservoir rocks in the reef margin regions and across the upper portions of the reefs (Jardine et al., 1982). About 75% of the Judy Creek reef field is filled with oil and the down-dip portion of the pool is water-bearing but the aquifer is too small to be effective. The reservoir behaves as a somewhat "closed" system and pressure declined rapidly with an estimated primary recovery of z 18% of original-oil-in-place (OOIP). Pressure maintenance by peripheral waterflood was initiated only three years after the start of production. Redwater field, in contrast, had 95% of the reef volume occupied by water, but the reef is connected to a large regional aquifer. The reservoir also has a strong natural water drive and produced 62% (OOIP) on primary production which extended over a period of about 30 years (Fig.
10-1). Thus, the extent of contiguous water in regional aquifers, and their ability to recharge an oil reservoir during production, are geological attributes which can affect the duration and extent of primary oil recovery. Primary recovery ranges from 0 to over 60% (OOIP) but averages ~ 19% for carbonate reservoirs in Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board, 1986; Howes, 1988).
JUDY CREEK
REDWATER
3
30
16
62
Years on Primary % Recovery ( OOIP )
0
0 W
W "CLOSED" .....
~///////~ High Permeability
[
]Low Permeability
Fig. 10-1. Large differences in primary production related to small and large effect of bottom-water drive in Judy Creek and Redwater reefs, respectively.
870 WATERFLOODING AND RESIDUAL OIL
Injection of water is the most widely used method of secondary recovery. Water injected in an injection well eventually breaks through into a production well. Thereafter, water production increases and oil production declines until oil recovery becomes uneconomic. At this stage, on average, approximately two thirds of the OOIP remains as residual oil in the reservoir and becomes a target for further recovery. The amount of residual oil varies widely from one reservoir to another as does the manner of its distribution. Both the amount and distribution of residual oil must be known for the design of effective strategies for further production. Residual oil occurs in the water-contacted portions of the reservoir trapped on small scales down to single oil droplets in individual pores. There is also the residual oil in macroscopic portions of the reservoir which were bypassed during the advance of the flood waters (Fig. 10-2). These macroscopic regions are related to heterogeneities within the reservoir and to local permeability barriers which obstruct the advance of water. The total recovery at the end of waterflooding (Re) is the product of the flood displacement efficiency in the waterswept regions (De) (oil recovered as a fraction of initial oil in place) and the volumetric sweep efficiency (V) which can be defined as the pore volume contacted by the injected water divided by the total pore volume of a reservoir or of a portion of a reservoir of interest (Craig, 1971). Thus:
SWEEP EFFICIENCY PRODUCERI
INJECTOR
Ea, AREAL SWEEP EFFICIENCY
INJECTOR
Ev,VERTICAL SWEEP EFFICIENCY PRODUCER t
Evol, VOLUMETRIC SWEEP EFFICIENCY Regions BB Swept Regions ! 1Unswept i Fig. 10-2. Areal, vertical and volumetric sweep efficiencies in a reservoir block.
871
Re-DeXVe
(10-1)
V can be considered as the product of vertical and horizontal components of sweep (Fig. 10-2). Oil trapped or immobilized on small scales in the water-swept regions of a reservoir may be mobilized by injection of tertiary fluids. These fluids change the viscosities, densities, interracial tensions, volumes, wettability or other properties of the fluids in the reservoir. Oil in portions of the reservoir unswept during waterflooding generally requires additional infill wells to improve continuity of oil-beating units between injection and production wells and to allow further production. It follows that different strategies are required to produce the remaining oil from the swept and unswept zones of a reservoir. The amounts of oil in these categories are difficult to assess, but global estimates for reserves totalling 513 billion barrels in the United States are presented in Fig. 10-3. An average of 33% (OOIP) is recovered at the end of secondary recovery, leaving 31% as immobile (residual) oil in swept zones and 36% bypassed in unswept zones. Of the latter, 19% is potentially mobile, and 17% is immobile. Immobile oil in water-swept zones and waterflood displacement efficiency (De) can be determined by tests under reservoir conditions on representative samples of reservoir rocks. Oil remaining in unswept zones and volumetric sweep efficiency (V) can be estimated indirectly i f D e is known and if ultimate recovery R can be estimated from pressure decline curves or, alternatively, by analogy with other similar reservoirs.
TOTAL :513 BILLION BARRELS (AS OF 87/12/:51)
CONVENTIONAL RECOVERY 33%
MOBILE IN UNSWEPT ZONES 19%
IMMOBILE IN U NSWEPT ZONES 17% IMMOBILE IN SWEPT ZONES 31% Source: BPO/Toris, API/AGA 1979, EIA 1987 (T. BURCHFIELD) Fig. 10-3. Primary and secondary recovery (conventional recovery) and categories of residual oil (T. Burchfield, pers. comm., 1987).
872 Estimation of R from decline curves is unsatisfactory because significant pressure decline may require long production times. A further problem is that the range of pressure changes and related changes of fluid viscosities and interfacial tensions which occur in the reservoir and affect the left hand side of Eq. 10-1 (R) commonly are not the same as those which occur in the core tests performed to estimate D . Furthermore, estimation by analogy is unsatisfactory because of uncertainties in identifying similar reservoirs produced to their limits. Alternative methods of assessing volumetric sweep require detailed reservoir description data combined with comprehensive surveillance programs using continuous flow meters and noise logs. Such methods may be combined with radioactive tracer tests, reservoir pressure data and interference tests (Langston et al., 1981). In summary, to assess the potential benefits of infill drilling and to estimate the amounts and distribution of residual oil requires that displacement efficiency (D) from core tests and volumetric sweep efficiency (V) from field tests and production data be known. D can be determined more easily and directly than can V and the importance of reliable core tests data should be emphasized. In the following sections, factors affecting microscopic displacement efficiency and volumetric sweep efficiency of oil by waterflooding are reviewed. e
e
D I S P L A C E M E N T EFFICIENCY
As water displaces oil at the pore scale, oil becomes disconnected and immobilized by one, or a combination, of several mechanisms. The properties of the rockpore system, the properties of the fluids, and the interaction of the fluids with the pore walls (wettability) all are important. A reservoir rock consists of larger spaces (pores), which are connected by smaller spaces or constrictions (throats). Thus, pores are, by definition, larger than the throats which connect them. However, larger pores may be connected by larger throats and smaller pores by smaller throats. That is, pore sizes and throat sizes may be arranged in a correlated rather than random or disordered manner. In the case of a correlated pore-throat structure, the smallest pore is not necessarily larger than the largest throat (Wardlaw, 1989). Throat size can be defined in terms of a plane of minimum cross-section between two adjacent pores. Pore size can be defined as a plane of maximum cross-section within a pore and also as the volume between the throats which define the pore. Thus, throats are defined in terms of diameter and pores in terms of diameter and volume. Pores represent the capacity of the rock to contain fluids but, in rocks where throats are much smaller than pores, it is the throats which have the major effect on fluid flow. Properties affecting multiphase fluid flow include the size-frequency distribution of pores and throats, the size correlation of directly connected throats and pores, and the spatial arrangement of pores and throats (Wardlaw, 1989). Throats and/or pores may have preferred orientations which confer preferred directions of flow within a pore system. A further pore property is that of irregularities or roughness of pore walls and their surface areas and characteristics. The most effective means of obtaining quantitative information about microscopic structure is through a combination of
873 mercury porosimetry and petrographic image analysis (PIA) (Ehrlich et al., 1984; 1988; Wardlaw, 1989; 1990). In addition to the properties of porous rocks, viscosities of displacing and displaced fluids, and their arrangement or configuration within the pore spaces (wettability), affect the relative flow and efficiency with which one fluid can displace another. Wettability is an expression of the relative affinities of immiscible fluids (brine, oil, gas) for mineral-rock surfaces, and can be evaluated external to the rock, as is the case with contact angle measurements; or within a rock sample, as is the case with Amott and USBM tests (Anderson, 1986; Buckley et al., 1989). Carbonate rocks appear to be mainly intermediate (water advancing contact angles of ~ 80 ~ 120 ~ to oil-wet (contact angles >__120 ~ (Treiber et al., 1972) or of mixed wettability (portions of surface more water-wet and portions more oil-wet). Four major mechanisms of oil trapping are recognized in water-swept reservoir rocks (Fig. 10-4). (1) Viscous fingering causes irregularities at the water-oil displacement front in systems with large water-oil mobility ratios (Craig, 1971). Viscous fingers cause early breakthrough of water, and the irregular advancing fronts leave residual pockets of oil which contribute to high residual saturations. Viscous fingering is not dependent on a porous structure in so far as it occurs between parallel plates in the absence of structure. (2) "Snap-off' of oil by capillary imbibition of water which forms collars of water at pore throats. These collars become unstable and snap-off in rocks which are strongly water-wet and have large pore-to-throat diameter ratios (Li and Wardlaw, 1986a, b). (3) Bypassing of oil related to differential travel of water-oil interfaces caused by V ISCOUS FINGERING
BYPASSING
CAR LLARY INSTABILIT Y
SURFACE TRAPPING
WATER WET .
WATER O OIL 9
.
.
.
.
//
.
I
\
INTERMEDIATE WET
c OIL WET 1
2
3
4
Fig. 10-4. Four mechanisms of oil-trapping on the microscope scale for three wettability conditions. (After Wardlaw, 1990.)
874 differences in the effective sizes of adjacent pathways within the rock. This differential travel causes bypassing of oil in heterogeneous systems. The greater the size contrasts (heterogeneity) the larger will be the oil residuals. (4) In oil-wet systems, oil is the phase contacting rock surfaces, and surface trapping is likely to be particularly important in rocks with highly irregular pore surfaces and large surface areas. Of the four mechanisms of oil entrapment, all occur at the core scale during waterflooding, and mechanisms 1 and 3 also occur at larger (reservoir) scales. Optimizing oil recovery involves imposing conditions during production which will minimize oil entrapment. Thus, there may be advantages to identifying the fraction of the total trapped oil which is associated with each of the above mechanisms, because the conditions of displacement that would minimize trapping by one mechanism are not necessarily the same as those that would minimize trapping by one of the other mechanisms. Minimizing oil entrapment requires knowing both the mechanisms of oil entrapment and the conditions under which they occur. In the following, a qualitative assessment is made of the effects of fluid and rock properties on the four mechanisms of oil entrapment.
Effects of fluid properties and wettability on trapping The relative effects of oil-water viscosity ratio, interfacial tension, wettability and waterflood velocity on the four trapping mechanisms are indicated in Table 10-I as being large or small. Large oil-water viscosity ratios cause large water-to-oil mobility ratios and promote viscous fingering (Craig, 1971) but have little effect on snap-off by capillary instability (Wardlaw, 1982) or oil trapping by bypassing (Laidlaw and Wardlaw, 1983). Large oil-water viscosity ratios may reduce recovery of oil from rough, oil-wet surfaces because of the large viscous resistance of the displaced phase and its relative inaccessibility in small surface spaces. Interfacial tension for water-oil interfaces during waterflooding generally is in the range of 15 to 30 mN/m, and these relatively small variations are not thought to affect significantly oil entrapment. Of course, interfacial tension lowering of several orders of magnitude does have important effects, and is of major importance in tertiary recovery where it is used to decrease capillary forces causing retention of oil in relation to viscous and gravity forces which promote oil mobilization. Increasing waterflood velocity increases instability and fingering at flood fronts. This causes earlier breakthrough of water and reduced recovery of oil (Peters and Flock, 1981). Increasing velocity causes an increase in viscous forces relative to capillary forces, and because snap-off requires the formation of a collar of water and is rate-dependent, oil may be displaced from a pore by viscous forces before snap-off has had time to break oil continuity in a downstream throat. Likewise, for water-wet systems, increasing flow rate can reduce trapping by bypassing (Laidlaw and Wardlaw, 1983). Although velocity has a potentially large effect on oil entrapment by three of the four mechanisms (Table 10-I), the extent to which this is the case for the relatively small range of velocity variations possible under field conditions of waterflooding is likely to be small.
875 TABLE 10-I Relative effects of fluid-wettability variables on trapping mechanisms under field conditions 1
2
3
4
Viscous fingering
Snap-off
Bypassing
Surface trapping
Viscosity ratio go/gw
L
S
S
L
Interfacial tension (~,)
S
S
S
S
Velocity (V)
S
S
S
S
Wettability
S
L
L
L
(0) L = large effect S = small effect
The effects of wettability on viscous fingering are small compared to the effects of mobility ratio and fluid velocity. Wettability differences, however, may have large effects on the other three trapping mechanisms. Strong water wetness favors extensive entrapment of oil by snap-off and by bypassing. Bypassing occurs with preferential advance of water in the finer oil-occupied pore spaces, leaving residual oil preferentially in the larger spaces. Oil wetness will favor larger residual oil saturations in rocks with large surface areas and rough pore walls. Inasmuch as oil continuity may be maintained across rough surfaces, such oil-wet systems do not have well defined oil-residual end points. With sufficient water throughput, oil flow may be maintained to low oil saturations but with diminishing oil-flow rates (Dullien et al., 1986). Surface area and surface characteristics vary widely in carbonate rocks and commonly are not well characterized (Fig. 10-5). Understanding the relationships of pore structure, wettability and mechanisms of oil entrapment is useful in understanding some of the apparent ambiguities in the published literature concerning the effects of wettability on displacement efficiency. For example, Salathiel (1973) presented evidence that strongly water-wet conditions caused high residual oil saturations compared with displacements conducted with mixed-wettability conditions. On the other hand, Mungan (1966) and Lefebvre du Prey (1973) provide evidence that strongly water-wet cores flooded more efficiently than cores of intermediate wettability. In contrast, Morrow (1978) presented evidence that there was less trapping at intermediate wettability than for strongly water-wet or strongly oil-wet conditions. Apparent contradictions of these kinds are, in part, related to the properties of porous media and can be expected if one considers the ways in which wettability changes affect trapping by the four mechanisms identified above. A change from strongly water-wet to strongly oil-wet conditions increases immobile oil for two of the mechanisms (surface trapping and viscous fingering), whereas it is expected to decrease immobile oil for the other two mechanisms (snap-off and bypassing) (Table 10-II).
876
Fig. 10-5. Differences in surface characteristics and surface area. (A) Dolomite (D) with irregular surfaces associated with irregular grains of microspar (M). (B) Dolomite with smooth planar crystal faces; pore walls are smoother and with lower surface area than in A.
Effects of rock-pore properties on trapping Table 10-III provides qualitative estimates of the effects of three rock attributes on the four trapping mechanisms. Carbonates commonly have relatively large secondary pores created by dissolution ("vuggy" carbonates). Such secondary pores are commonly accessed by throats which have sheet-like form, similar to spaces between sub-parallel plates (Wardlaw, 1976) and have large pore-throat size contrast (Fig.10-6). The "matrix" between large secondary pores or vugs commonly is relatively "tight" (porosity z 3 - 5%). Under water-wet conditions, large amounts ofoil would be trapped in the large pores by a combination of snap-off and bypassing. The vugs may represent a large fraction of the total pore volume, and if they remain filled with oil following TABLE 10-II Effects of wettability on trapping mechanisms Wettability condition
Viscous fingering
Snap-off
Bypassing
Surface trapping
Strongly water wet
S
L
L
S
Intermediate wettability
L
S
S
L
Strongly oil wet
L
S
S
L
S = smaller potential for trapping residual oil. L = larger potential for trapping residual oil. Arrows indicate increasing (1') and decreasing ($) potential for trapping by various mechanisms as a function of wettability.
877 TABLE 10-III Trapping mechanisms 1
2
3
4
Viscous fingering
Snap-off
Bypassing
Surface trapping
Pore-throat size ratio
S
L
S
S
Surface roughness
S
L
S
L
Heterogeneity (spatial order)
S
S
L
S
L = Large effect S = Small effect
waterflooding, oil displacement efficiency would be low (Figs. 10-4A and 10-7A). Under intermediate to oil-wet conditions, however, oil is displaced from vugs and the residual oil saturation is much lower (Fig. 10-7B) (Wardlaw, 1980). Thus, the effects of large pore-throat size ratio on trapping and residual oil saturation can only be evaluated when the wettability of the system is known. Because most carbonates are thought to be intermediate to oil-wet (Chilingar and Yen, 1983), rather than strongly water wet, the effects of large pore/throat ratio on oil trapping may be minimized. The surface roughness of carbonates varies widely (Fig. 10-5). The combination of high surface area (large surface roughness) and oil wetness will contribute to high residual oil at the economic limit (Table 10-II) but high surface area need not cause high residual oil in water-wet rocks (Fig. 10-4A).
A
B
Fig. 10-6. (A) and (B): Etched dolomite crystals (D) and epoxy resin impregnated pores (P) connected by sheet-like throats (T) in reservoirs with large pore/throat size ratios.
878
Fig. 10-7. Etched glass micromodel with vugs and matrix porosity. Water (dark) and oil (light) at residual oil saturation following waterflood. (A) Water-wet model; residual oil fills vugs and residual oil saturation is large. (B) Intermediate to oil wet; oil was displaced from vugs and residual oil saturation is much lower than in A. Both A and B have small amounts of oil trapped in matrix. Thus, whether water-wetness or oil-wetness favors greater oil recovery efficiency can be evaluated only in the context of rock-pore properties. Conversely, the effects of rock-pore properties on recovery can be evaluated only if the wettability of the system is known. Generally, studies of wettability in the published literature are not accompanied by quantitative information about the pore structure of the rocks tested, and the apparent ambiguity of the results is not surprising. The presence of heterogeneities in cores from reservoirs tends to increase irregularities at the advancing fluid front and increases oil trapped by bypassing (Wardlaw and Cassan, 1979; Wardlaw, 1980). The end points of a two-phase displacement are an initial connate water saturation ( S ) and a final or residual oil saturation (Sr). These end points define the amount of oil which is recoverable, and have been shown in experimental studies with sandpacks to be affected more by the spatial order or clustering of pores and throats of particular types and sizes than by their lack of
879 uniformity or sorting (Morrow, 1971; Chatzis et al., 1983). This spatial order is usually referred to as heterogeneity. Local clustering of smaller pores and throats causes higher L i and, for water-wet conditions, local clustering of larger pores and throats causes higher S r (Fig. 10-8). The combination of high S i and high S r defines low oil recovery. For the same population of poorly sorted particles, S i and SOr both can be changed greatly by altering the arrangement from disordered to spatially ordered (i.e., local clustering of smaller and larger particles or crystals). On the other hand, degree of grain sorting does not appear to affect significantly either S or S for disordered packings. Thus, it is not so much degree of sorting or lack of uniformity of particle or crystal size which is the issue, but rather, the spatial arrangement (type and degree of heterogeneity) which affects oil recovery efficiency. Some common types of heterogeneity Wl
oF
WATER RETENTION AT I R R E D U C I B L E S A T U R A T I O N
DISORDERED S.~
10%
~Sal I I Oil D Water
ORDERED Sw~ ~ 35%
OIL R E T E N T I O N AT R E S I D U A L OIL S A T U R A T I O N
DISORDERED So, ~ 14%
ORDERED Sor -~40%
Fig. 10-8. (A) Initial connate water saturation (Swi) in a disordered sand. (B) Swi in a sand with clusters of smaller sand grains (ordered) as discontinuous domains in a continuous domain of larger grains. Sw~much larger in B thanA, although size frequency distribution of grains could be the same in both. (C) Residual oil saturation (So,.) following waterflood in a disordered sand. (D) S r following waterflood in a sand with clusters of larger grains as discontinuous domains in a continuous domain of smaller grains. S r is much larger in D than in C, although size frequency distribution of grains could be the same in C and D.
880 and their effects on microscopic displacement efficiency are given in Wardlaw and Cassan (1978). Pore systems in carbonate reservoir rocks are thought to be more heterogeneous, as a group, than those of clastics and, if so, lower oil recovery efficiency can be expected.
Effects of wettability on recovery from fractured carbonates Fractures in carbonates may create dual porosity-permeability systems which can be considered as an aspect of heterogeneity. Fractures tend to be more abundant in dolomites than in limestones (Aguilera, 1980) and have important effects on flow which are difficult to evaluate in core tests. Fracturing may contribute greatly to permeability but not much to porosity, whereas the matrix blocks between fractures may have low permeability but contain most of the pore volume (storage) of the system. Reiss (1980) presented a discussion of displacement in vug-matrix-fracture systems under water-wet and oil-wet conditions. The efficiency with which water or gas can displace oil is affected by the combined effects of gravity, capillary and viscous forces; gravity forces due to differences of density between oil and water or gas, capillary forces due to the interaction of surface forces within pores which is related to wettability, and viscous forces where the fluids are moving. The initial rate of expulsion of oil (qi) p e r unit cross-section, from an element of matrix suddenly immersed in water, can be derived from:
k a(Pw-Po)g + P o qi = 1.to a
(10-2)
where" k = matrix permeability to oil Pw,Po = water and oil specific gravities ~o = oil viscosity a = typical vertical dimensions of the matrix element P = capillary pressure The term a(p w - Po)g represents the magnitude of the gravity force, and is proportional to the dimensions of the matrix blocks. The necessary condition for oil expulsion to take place is qi > O"
a(Pw -- Po)g + P~ > 0
(10-3)
If a rock is water-wet, gravity reinforces capillary imbibition and both terms in Eq. 10-3 are positive, qi > O, and oil is displaced by water. Water travelling along fractures imbibes spontaneously into adjacent matrix displacing oil back into the fracture (counter-current imbibition) for transport out of the system. For an oil-wet matrix, capillary forces oppose the penetration of water into the matrix and displacement of oil from the matrix is possible only if gravity effects overcome the threshold capillary displacement pressure (Pd):
881 a(p~ - Po)g > Pa
(10-4)
Invasion of matrix blocks by water is only possible if the size of the matrix blocks between fractures "a" is large (Reiss 1980). Viscous forces, as well as gravity forces, may contribute to the displacement of oil by water. Beliveau et al. (1991) provided an example from the Mississippian Midale carbonates of Saskatchewan of the importance of water-wetness to production from a matrix-fracture system. The total waterflood pressure gradients applied across the reservoir from injectors to off-trend row producers is about 1.5 psi/ft (~ 30 kPa/m). Fracture-matrix capillary pressure differences are of about the same magnitude. If the rocks are water-wet, viscous and capillary forces work together. Matrix blocks spontaneously soak up water by imbibition as well as expel oil by viscous drive due to the applied pressure gradient. Water breakthrough in such a water-wet system will be retarded, and performance may appear similar to a conventional unfractured reservoir. Evidence from wettability tests, as well as simulations of reservoir performance, indicate that the Midale carbonates are, at least in part, water wet (Beliveau et al. 1991). If these rocks were oil wet, however, then the matrix would repel water and the viscous forces would not be sufficiently large for oil to be displaced from one foot or larger (1/3 m) matrix blocks. Waterflooding would be less efficient and water breakthrough would occur earlier in an oil-wet fractured reservoir of this type than in their water-wet or unfractured counterparts. Moderate lowering of interfacial tension has been shown to have beneficial effects on oil recovery in matrix-fracture systems by altering the balance of gravity and capillary forces (Schechter et al., 1991). In summary, specific attributes of the pore system affect the different trapping mechanisms to varying degrees for different conditions of wettability. For example, in vuggy carbonates with large pore/throat size ratios, snap-off is of first order importance to trapping large amounts of oil under water-wet conditions but not under intermediate to oil-wet conditions. Heterogeneity, on the other hand, affects trapping by bypassing for any wettability condition. Surface roughness is important for surface trapping under strongly oil-wet conditions. From the above, it is apparent that wettability and pore structure are variables of first order importance to oil recovery and that whether water-wet or oil-wet is the more favorable wettability condition depends on the properties of the rock-pore system. Conversely, the significance of rock-pore properties can be evaluated satisfactorily only if the system wettability is known. For a system with conductive fractures which define matrix blocks with significant porosity and low permeability, oil recovery is likely to be greater for waterwet than for oil-wet conditions. The optimum wettability condition for a wide range of reservoir rock properties would appear to be one of weak water wetness (contact angles somewhat less than 90 ~) or weak water wetness combined with oil wetness for different portions of surfaces within the same rock (mixed wettability). This latter condition provides the benefits of spontaneous imbibition of water while providing continuous pathways for oil flow down to low saturations.
882 VOLUMETRIC SWEEP EFFICIENCY
Volumetric sweep efficiency is a measure of the three dimensional effect of larger scale reservoir heterogeneities, and is a product of the pattern areal sweep and vertical sweep efficiencies. Sweep efficiency is affected by mobility ratio, density contrasts amongst fluids, relative magnitudes of capillary and viscous forces, and heterogeneity (Craig, 1971; Stalkup, 1983). Permeability contrasts amongst adjacent units, the lateral continuity of these units in relation to well spacing, and the presence or absence of partial or complete permeability barriers which affect cross flow between units, all have important effects on volumetric sweep efficiency (Fig. 10-9). INJECTION WELL
PRODUCTION WELL
NON-LAYERED
,
NON-
.t co.,,,.
PARTIALLY
4,...e.o.....,,.u,!.:...,,,.,.,,..,3...
LAYERED
Fig. 10-9. Non-layered and layered reservoir models with communicating, non-communicating and partially communicating layers.
Continuity of beds, wells spacing and position The geometry, internal arrangement and continuity of differing lithologies and petrophysical types within carbonate reservoirs depends on such factors as the biota present, sea-level fluctuations, rates of sedimentation and subsidence, and tectonic effects as well as all the diagenetic overprinting (Mazzullo and Chilingarian, 1992). The continuity or lack of continuity of permeable beds as a function of lateral distance is an important factor in determining optimum recovery schemes. Delaney and Tsang (1981) applied the methods of Ghauri et al. (1974) and Stiles (1976, 1977) to measuring reservoir continuity within the Devonian Judy Creek carbonate reef in Alberta. The fraction of the total section composed of continuous beds was plotted as a function of interwell distance for various reservoir facies (Fig. 10-10). Continuity was greater in the reef margin than in the reef interior. The decrease in continuity of layers as a function of distance can be used in defining optimum well spacing and in analyzing the potential benefits of infill drilling.
883
CONTINUITY vs INTERWELL DISTANCE
100 >"
I"
Z I-. Z
,~
806040-
I I I I I
INCREMENTAL 10%
CONTINUITY
<1
0 (=)
20-
I 0
0
It 500
9
I
i t 1000
I 1500
I 2000
I 2500
I 3000
INTERWELL DISTANCE (m) Fig. 10-10. Percentage of continuous strata as a function of distance. (After Delaney and Tsang, 1981.)
For reservoirs formed in particular paleogeographic settings, there are characteristic shapes and orders of deposition of genetic units and these units may have characteristic width/thickness/length relationships (Weber, 1986). Relationships of these types have been defined for clastic sequences, but few data are available for carbonates. In addition to differences between horizontal and vertical permeabilities, there may be preferred horizontal flow paths within layers, and the presence of such flow paths must be known for optimal siting of injection and production wells. These directional permeabilities may be related to depositional, diagenetic or tectonic events. Permeability anisotropy may be inferred from a depositional model, or in the case of fractures, from observations of wellbore ellipticity and breakouts (Bell, 1989). Waterflood performance in carbonates can be dominated by natural sub-vertical fractures with preferred orientations. Such is the case in the Midale Formation (Mississippian) of Saskatchewan, where production wells located "on trend" from injectors (aligned with the fractures) showed early water breakthrough from waterflooding (Beliveau et al., 1991). In contrast, response of"offtrend" producers was smooth and delayed. Similarly, in the Norman Wells carbonate reef reservoir, waterflood injection and production wells were placed to take advantage of the directional permeabilities associated with fracture systems (West and Doyle-Read, 1988). In order to make effective use of reservoir description data of the above types on, for example, a waterflood, it is necessary to have waterflood surveillance programs. The results of these programs can be used to ensure the best possible volumetric sweep efficiency. Langston et al. (1981 ) considered such surveillance programs within the Jay/Lec field, in the Smackover and Norphlet Formations of the Gulf Coast, U.S.A., in two categories depending on whether the primary measurement was concerned with vertical sweep or areal (horizontal) sweep.
884 Vertical sweep
The total section in injection wells was opened by conducting multistage acidfracture treatments through spaced sets of perforations. Temperature surveys, tracer surveys, continuous flow meters and noise logs were used to define the degree of vertical conformance. The noise log was selected as the basic surveillance tool because it could detect flow behind pipe and provide an order of magnitude injection profile (Langston et al., 1981). The continued use of these surveys confirmed that water injection profiles are generally proportional to core permeability-thickness. Evaluation tools used to determine the success of conformance workovers in production wells included flowmeter/ gradiomanometer surveys, noise logs and pressure build-up tests. Areal sweep
Three procedures were used to define and control areal sweep (Langston et al., 1981). These methods involved the use of radioactive tracers, interference testing between injection and production wells and the monitoring of bottomhole pressure in key wells. These procedures were successful in defining injection wells responsible for water breakthrough, and for determining the source of water breaking through into producers. Principal conclusions of Langston et al. (1981) in the Jay/Lec field were that areal sweep generally was effective because of the favorable water-oil mobility ratio, but that vertical sweep in areas of high permeability contrast was poor. Based on the above information, infill wells were completed to improve vertical and areal conformance. Additional oil was recovered from discontinuous zones and vertical sweep was improved by selectively completing low-permeability zones which had been flooded more slowly. Areal sweep efficiency was improved by locating wells outside existing waterflood patterns. Injection balancing was implemented to optimize volumetric sweep efficiency by achieving waterfront closure in all zones from opposite directions on all producing wells while maintaining balanced zonal pressures to prevent wellbore crossflow. These measures delayed production decline until 75% of the estimated ultimate recovery had been produced and resulted in production in excess of 86% of the reserves in this carbonate reservoir. Shales and other permeability barriers
Shales and other permeability barriers exist on all scales up to that of the entire reservoir, and have important effects as baffles during displacement. Efforts have been made to collect data on shale continuity as a function of environment of deposition from which trends of continuity distribution could be derived. Most of this information, however, is for clastic and not for carbonate systems (Weber, 1986). Haldorsen and Lake (1984) modeled the continuity and spatial disposition of shales from North Sea reservoirs and elsewhere using statistical techniques. With the assumption of random distribution in space, models can be generated with a computer
885 and conditioned to fit the well data. Such models have been used to calculate the effective permeabilities of grid blocks. Carbonate reservoirs commonly have permeability barriers other than shales. Evaporites, tight carbonates, and stylolitic zones may be common and of variable continuity. Such barriers may be breached locally by fractures or solution channels. Lapre (1980) has given an overview of reservoir potential as a function of geologic setting for carbonate rocks. Detailed facies mapping both vertically and laterally is required to delineate the type and distribution of permeability barriers (Bebout and Pendexter, 1975). Permeability is subject to different errors and influences depending on the scale at which it is evaluated and any evaluation, deterministic or stochastic, requires geological input. In addition to geological input, vertically isolated zones of lower permeability can be defined by measuring detailed pressure profiles in newly drilled wells using wireline formation tester measurements. Flowmeter surveys and other production monitoring methods also may indicate the presence and position of baffles (Weber, 1986). If zones of a reservoir are separated by areally extensive permeability barriers, then each zone should be open to production and injection to ensure drainage of oil from the zone. Where barriers are of limited areal extent, calculations can be made to evaluate the potential coning of water or gas to aid in the location of completion intervals. For example, completion in the interval above a barrier could limit coning of water from below. Oil beneath the barrier will gravitate up around the barrier and be recovered if the barrier width is not too large (Richardson et al., 1987). Coning can be controlled by working wells over to reperforate above a shale barrier to avoid water coning or below a barrier to avoid gas coning. In the case of vertical gas drives, barriers are important in retaining oil above the gas-oil interface. As the gas-oil interface falls below a thin permeability barrier, oil is retained above the barrier. This oil is subject to gravity drainage and may rejoin the main oil body and be produced. Barriers may not significantly affect oil recovery if their lateral dimensions are small, but drainage times increase with the barrier width squared, and large barriers may retain significant amounts of oil beyond the lifetime of the field (Richardson et al., 1987). Estimation of volumetric sweep is necessary in order to evaluate the amounts of oil which are in the water-contacted portion of a reservoir and in the unswept portions. This information is required for decisions about infill drilling and/or the implementation of EOR procedures. If the ultimate recovery (Re) of a field can be projected from production decline data, and if the recovery efficiency is known for the contacted portion of a field (D) based on reliable and representative core displacement tests, then the volumetric sweep efficiency can be obtained indirectly (lie). Direct methods of obtaining volumetric sweep are not generally available, but a variety of field surveillance programs, such as those used in the Jay/LEC field described above (Langston et al., 1981), provide additional ways of acquiring data about sweep efficiency. It should be noted, however, that pressure decline curves may reflect the effects of fluid and rock expansion and phase behavior related to substantial pressure changes. These changes commonly are not incorporated in routine laboratory flood tests. That is, the right-hand side of Eq. 10-1 may not represent the same conditions as those which apply for the left-hand side of the equation.
886 A third method of assessing sweep efficiency requires a reservoir model and simulations of fluid displacements for a variety of imposed conditions. The challenges of constructing models are reviewed in the following section.
RESERVOIR MODELS FOR SIMULATION OF PRODUCTION
Reservoir models are necessary for forecasting the rates and proportions of fluid recovery and for selecting optimal recovery schemes and patterns of well placement. Forecasts of recoverable reserves are still notoriously in error in spite of recent advances in reservoir characterization (Haldorsen and Damsleth, 1991). A model of the spatial distribution and intercommunication of major reservoir units with assigned average petrophysical properties is required. Properties of interest inelude porosity, permeability, and relative permeability-fluid saturation relationships. Seismic data, pressure transient well test data and geological-petrophysical data from cores and from well logs all are used in building such reservoir models. Seismic data can be integrated with well log and core data for purposes of defining reservoir flow units with distinctive petrophysical properties in inter-well regions. The areal sampling of seismic data far exceeds the relative lack of data available from wells (Araktingi et al., 1991). The conditioning of seismic data for this integration, however, is difficult, and the resolution, both areally and, particularly, in depth is presently inadequate for delineating reservoir units and their properties at the necessary scale. The focus here is on the integration of well data and pressure well test data in the construction of reservoir models. Core and well logs in conjunction with a knowledge of possible genetic models, may be used to delineate major distinctive chronostratigraphic and facies units. Where obvious differences are not apparent, or these units require further and finer subdivision, a reservoir or reservoir unit can be segmented arbitrarily in both the vertical and horizontal directions. Statistical tests can then be applied to determine whether differences exist in reservoir quality among the segments. The null hypothesis that each sample was drawn from an identical parent population can be tested. A population can be defined as a volume of reservoir rock that has undergone similar depositional and diagenetic processes (Jensen et al., 1987). Combinations of adjacent segments can be tested for equality of means, and larger homogeneous data sets within the reservoir can be defined. Figure 10-11 provides an example of a reef which was divided into 16 segments of arbitrary thickness. Statistical testing of horizontal core permeability measurements within each segment allowed definition of reservoir blocks each with significantly different core permeabilities, at the 5% significance level, from adjacent blocks (McNamara and Wardlaw, 1991). Similar procedures can be followed for porosity, vertical permeability or other core-measured properties. Following definition of reservoir blocks with significantly different petrophysical properties, it is then necessary to provide average properties for each block in the reservoir model. Taking the example of permeability, how can an average permeability for a reservoir grid block be obtained from the permeability distribution function of core measurements from that block? The problem is one of scaling-up core-scale flow measurements in order to represent flow at larger (grid block) scales.
887
INTERIOR
MARGIN 059
.079
FLANK
.040
.033
..........................
.093
.
.040
-.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
.o .
.
.
""I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
9
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.072
.044
......................................
.
.082
. . . . . . . 9. 1. .0. .9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1. .0. .4.6. . . . . . . .
.051
....................................
.099
.04
ra-" ,
1.059 x .037
Fig. 10-11. Arithmetic averages and standard deviations of porosity (fraction) for position and layer groupings belonging to the same populations. Boxes enclose regions having statistically equivalent distribution of porosity. For each box, averagevalues are on the left and standard deviation is on the right. Arrows indicate increasing porosity. (After McNamara and Wardlaw 1991.) Biases of core measurements
Before the question of scale is addressed, possible biases in the core permeability measurements should be evaluated and, where possible, corrected. A number of factors (Aufricht, 1968; Keelan, 1972; McNamara and Wardlaw, 1991) may contribute to bias horizontal permeability (kH) measurements towards higher values: (i) measurements are not made at overburden pressure; (ii) measurements are not corrected for gas slippage; (iii) vugs and fractures are large in relation to core size and transect core; (iv) additional fractures are induced by coring; and (v) single-phase gas permeability measurements are likely to be higher than effective permeability of gas or oil in the presence of connate water. Average values of kH may be unrealistically low in certain cases: (i) core with the largest vugs and most frequent open fractures has been broken up and has not been recovered; (ii) experimental equipment cannot detect small pressure drops associated with the highest permeability samples; (iii) open fractures linking high permeability units in the subsurface have not been adequately sampled and measured in core; and (iv) drilling mud invasion has restricted communication. Several of these factors may also affect core measurements of vertical permeability (kv). As pointed out by Lishman (1969), the practice of making measurements on core samples, which are longer than their diameter, magnifies the contrast between horizontal and vertical permeability. The factor k v may also be influenced by the horizontal permeability barriers which are continuous at the core scale but discontinuous at larger scales, thus making the core k v unrealistically low.
888 Aside from the above difficulties associated with core permeability measurements, there is the problem of averaging these measurements to represent flow at some larger (grid block) scale in the reservoir. In order to be of use as input in simulating reservoir behavior, permeability must be averaged at the grid-block scale. Averaging core data to represent flow at the grid-block scale
The writer will assume that permeability measurements are available from continuous full-diameter core samples from the reservoir interval of interest. Permeability variability in the vertical sequence of cores may represent volumes of rock in the inter-well region which have: (i) differing permeabilities with high and low permeability blocks arranged parallel to each other (layer cake); (ii) or in series; (iii) or in a partially or completely disordered spatial array. The appropriate means for the permeability frequency distribution, which should be used to represent the average permeability of the interwell rock in each of these three cases, are the arithmetic, harmonic and geometric means, respectively (Havlena, 1966) (Fig. 1012). X 1 "]-X 2 + ....
Arithmetic Mean
-.1-X n
(10-5)
n
Harmonic Mean
(10-6)
1 .
n
x 1
Geometric Mean n ~/ X 1 X 2
x 2
....
X n
.
.
.
n
(10-7)
Thus, before averaging is undertaken, information is required about the spatial distribution of volumes of rock with differing permeabilities. Estimating effective permeability requires a frequency distribution of permeabilities as well as a model of their spatial distribution. As pointed out by Cardwell and Parsons (1945), the equivalent permeability of a heterogeneous portion of a reservoir lies between a harmonic volume average and an arithmetic volume average of the permeability measurements made at some smaller (core) scale. Core permeability measurements commonly are log-normally or near to being lognormally distributed (Bachu and Underschultz, 1992). If permeability is log-normally distributed but the total permeability variance is small, then errors introduced by not using an averaging technique (arithmetic, harmonic, geometric mean) appropriate to the spatial distribution of permeability units are small (Lake et al., 1986). However, carbonate reservoirs commonly are very heterogeneous and may have permeability differences of 10,000 times or more over short distances (Fig. 10-13). In such cases, the differences between arithmetic means for layer-cake models and geometric means for disordered arrangements of permeability units become very large (illustrated in Table 10-IV). Because permeability measured at the core scale is commonly log-normally dis-
889
ARITHMETIC MEAN FOR PARALLEL ~ - ~
K1
n
~1
~: K~ i
KA = K3
n
~3
HARMONIC MEAN FOR SERIES K.
~ K i
i
GEOMETRIC MEAN FOR RANDOM K~ =
Ki
n
WHERE
After HAVLENA, D. 1966
9"tr = Product of n terms one for each i positive integer from i to n
Fig. 10-12. The appropriate mean depends on the spatial arrangement (order) of blocks with differing permeability. (After Havlena, 1966.)
tributed and has large variance, it is concluded that information about the spatial arrangement of units with differing permeability and the choice of an averaging technique appropriate to the spatial order are important. Spatial order implies local clustering of units with similar properties in a non-uniform system and commonly is referred to as heterogeneity. Both the scale and type of heterogeneity have important effects on multiphase fluid flow and recovery efficiency. The variogram provides a quantitative measure of the scale of heterogeneity and is widely used in reservoir modeling. TABLE 10-IV Comparison of arithmetic, geometric and harmonic means; log-normal distributions with geometric means of 100 and variances (%) of from 0.1 - 3.0
%= 0.1
%= 0.5
%= 1.0
%= 2.0
%= 3.0
Arithmetic mean
100.52
113.39
164.68
727.45
7928.22
Geometric mean
100.02
100.12
100.24
100.47
100.71
Harmonic mean
99.52
88.25
60.19
12.77
1.10
Source: After McGill et al., 1991
890
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1630 i
-
~ii~i!!i~iiigiii!i!ii~!iiii!i~iii~ii!i~ii~i~i!!!!!.!!!!i!!!!!!!i!!i!ii!!!~i!!ii~i!i~!~:!:~..
......
E 3:: 1640- :!~i~i~N I-13. ILl ,.,,=
1650-
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000 10000
PERMEABILITY (mD) Fig. 10-13. Permeability in millidarcies from full-diameter core measurements from a dolomitized stromatoporoid reef (Keg River, OO Pool, 15-16-110-06W6 Alberta, Canada). Permeability is highly variable in vertical profile.
The variogram, kriging and conditional simulation One may consider a vertical outcrop face with core plugs taken on a regular grid and permeability measured from the plugs. Altematively, one could consider a vertical core with permeability measurements made at specified spacings. The variogram describes variability as a function of the distance between measurements. The average variance of a number (N) of measurement pairs (Y) within certain distance intervals (S) may show increasing variability (~,) with increasing interval distance (Fig. 1014); N(s)
1 ~i = ! 2 r (s) = N (S)
[Y(xi)- Y(xidr S)] 2
(10-8)
891
/SILL _0.2
_
,.
I
I
, .
I
1
I
.
.
I
.
I
I
,I
I
I
123 S (Distance) S=1
S-2 S-3 Fig. 10-14. Diagrammatic representation of a variogram showing variability (c) of a property (e.g., permeability) as a function of distance between measurements (1S, 2S, 3S, etc.). Beyond a certain distance, referred to as the range or the correlation length, T may no longer increase. The variance that corresponds with the range is the sill and typically corresponds to the variance for the entire data set. Kriging is a technique of estimating properties at unsampled points or blocks distributed over an area of interest by taking a weighted average of sample measurements surrounding a regularly spaced grid point or block. Kriging incorporates the spatial correlation structure contained in the variogram model. Conditional simulation uses the underlying permeability structure obtained from kriging and adds a component associated with the uncertainty of the limited permeability data.A large number of permeability realizations then can be made for the inter-well region of interest and a "realistic" permeability distribution selected from within a range of uncertainty. These realizations honor the permeability measurements made from core at specific sites. For full discussion of these procedures see Journel and Huijbregts (1978), and for examples of applications to carbonate sequences and reservoirs, see Fogg et al. (1990, 1991 ) and Senger et al. (1991). Ranges or correlation lengths can be from distances of meters or less to distances of hundreds or even thousands of meters (Araktingi et al., 1991; Senger et al., 1991). Spatial order also can be "nested" with several different scales of heterogeneity within the same group of rocks (Fig. 10-15). Correlation lengths for subsurface reservoirs which are derived from core or log data measurements will usually be approximately vertical and perpendicular to
892
'.'........:..~,:.'t... -'' .) . . . . . . . t~ " ' " "L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . ' 1 . ' . . ' . " ." .':'~'J'.'." .'.'.'.'.'." : - ' . ' . ' . ' . r . ' . ; . . . ." ~ .1.~...3..~...:.':~ :~.'.":'.".".'[ [.': ~'i'." i .-." .'.._ [ . . i.i v
," ." ,"_'-rT-J."
~ . . , ~ ~ . ' . i . ' - c . ~
,
9 . !t
i
.
9 "'''"'"
,
,
,
"
'"
'
q
9 ~
lO0's m .."
lO's m "
.
'
o
.
'
'
10-100 ~
9
"
'
1-10 m
10-100
After Weber (4986) Fig. 10-15. Spatial order can occur on scales from that of small clusters of pores to dimensions approaching that of an entire reservoir. This can be the case for carbonates and siliciclastics alike. (After Weber, 1986.) stratification. Correlation lengths parallel to stratification might be obtained from horizontal wells but, more commonly, are obtained from analogous rocks in outcrop. It is to be expected that horizontal correlation lengths will be greater than vertical correlation lengths, because sedimentary sequences tend to be stackings of tabular units. McGill et al. (1991) studied the effects of increasing horizontal correlation length on effective permeability (k) using various averaging procedures. They used data sets with horizontal correlation lengths from zero (completely disordered) up to more than twice the length of the system being studied (inter-well spacing). Vertical correlation lengths were maintained constant. They noted that as the horizontal correlation length increases, the system effectively becomes more highly layered and the arithmetic mean of the "layers" provides the best estimate of k. On the other hand, where the correlation lengths are much smaller than the size of the system, the system behaves as though it were uncorrelated and the geometric mean provides the most appropriate estimate o f k e. Thus, there is a spectrum of means lying between the arithmetic mean and the geometric mean which are related to the correlation lengths. Variograms are useful in providing measures of the scale of heterogeneity (Fig. 1015) but may not contain information about the t y p e of heterogeneity. It is t y p e of
893
Fig. 10-16. A. Lower-permeability regions are discontinous and higher-permeability regions (denser symbol) are continuous. B. Lower-permeability regions are continuous and higher-permeability regions discontinous. A and B would not have the same permeabilities or residual oil saturations, but vertical variograms would be similar because spatial ordering occurs on similar scales.
heterogeneity which greatly affects the efficiency of displacement of one fluid by another. For example, variograms for core data through the heterogeneities in Figs. 10-16A and 10-16B could have similar ranges and sills but, in Fig. 10-16A, the higher permeability rocks are continuous and the lower permeability rocks are discontinuous compared with the reverse relationships in Fig. 10-16B. These differences in continuity or "type" of heterogeneity could cause differences of sweep efficiency, the nature of which would depend on the fluid properties and wettability. There are other problems in using the variogram as a measure of spatial continuity. Data sets from reservoirs tend to be relatively sparse, irregularly spaced, and may or may not be random samples. For example, samples may have been taken preferentially from areas with high values. Also, Srivastava and Parker (1989) have shown that variograms given by Eq. 10-8 often produce erratic and unreliable results when applied to positively skewed data such as are typical for permeability. They are also unreliable where the dispersion of values increases with an increase of mean value as also may be the case for permeability (McNamara and Wardlaw, 1991). Srivastava and Parker (1989) considered covariance measures and the correlogram as more robust measures of spatial continuity than is provided by the simple variogram. Lasseter et al. (1986) have addressed the fundamental problem, which is inherent in the preceding section, that heterogeneities causing differences in petrophysical properties at small scales can be effectively included in large-scale simulations by use of pseudo-functions. They describe a pseudo-function generation process in which the effects of smaller scale heterogeneities can be included without an inordinately large number of grid blocks. Van de Graft and Ealey (1989) discussed the hierarchical nature of heterogeneity and the types of quantification, which are required for numerical simulation studies. In summary, averaging measurements of permeability made at small (core) scales to represent flow at larger (reservoir grid-block) scales requires, not only permeability frequency distributions for suitably sampled rocks, but also information about the
894 types and scales of spatial order (heterogeneity). The success of various methods of averaging core scale measurements to represent average permeability at larger scales can be evaluated by comparing estimates made from core with permeability derived from in-situ pressure transient well tests. This topic is considered in the following section.
Comparison of permeability-derived from core and from pressure well tests Pressure transient well tests provide a means of obtaining permeability averaged for the test interval and drainage radius of the test. Where core measurements of permeability are available within this interval and radius, the averaging procedure for the core data, which gives the best match with the permeability derived from the well test, can be obtained (Warren and Price, 1961). The averaging technique, which gives the best match, should be consistent with the geological model for the region tested (layer-cake, disordered, etc.). If the core-measured permeabilities are reliable and representative of the test interval, and if the spatial arrangement of permeability units of differing permeability is known (geological model), then the core data can be averaged in an appropriate manner to predict flow at larger scales. Differences between this average and the permeability derived from the pressure well tests then could be attributed to contributions to permeability occurring at scales larger than those measured in core. Fractures would be a common example of this type, and the contribution of fractures to flow at larger scales in the reservoir then could be evaluated. Published reports in which comparisons are made between permeability derived from pressure transient well tests and that measured in cores are relatively few in number. Langston (1976) stated that buildup tests have provided the basis for arithmetic averaging of core data used to determine effective reservoir permeability, and are a significant guide in the planning and evaluation of workovers leading to better conformance. Richardson et al. (1987) observed that arithmetic averages of foot-byfoot horizontal permeabilities measured parallel to bedding planes are consistent with permeabilities calculated from well tests. This is a surprising result considering the common lack of lateral continuity of thin units at the scale of well spacings. Harmonic averages were used to obtain a best estimate of vertical permeability. On the other hand, Moore (1989) concluded that geometric mean permeability estimates were the most reliable for wells which had not been hydraulically fractured in Barque and Clipper sandstone reservoirs of the southern North Sea Basin. McNamara and Wardlaw (1991) reported that the geometric mean of core-measured permeability, corrected for truncation of high-permeability values, provided the best correspondence with permeability estimated from a pressure buildup test. These data were consistent with a reservoir model in which blocks of differing permeability were arranged in a disordered manner when viewed at the scale of inter-well spacing. The quality of the data from a pressure buildup test and the reliability of a derived permeability-thickness (kh) estimate can be assessed with some confidence. With high quality data, the major difficulty is in assigning appropriate values to h in order to derive an average k. Whether it is better to use the perforated interval only, or the net or gross total porous-permeable interval, may depend on local circumstances such as
895 the degree of communication of layers or the importance and extent of sub-vertical fractures. With attention to these matters, a large-scale, average permeability can be derived and used for comparison with core-averaged permeability. Without some independent measurement of large-scale permeability, it is difficult to evaluate the confidence that can be placed in core measurements and the various procedures that are used to average core measurements in order to assign permeability values to large reservoir grid-blocks.
TERTIARY OIL RECOVERY IN CANADA
Oil reserves in Canada have been declining for twenty years, and many reservoirs, which have been on primary and secondary recovery for long periods of time, have become candidates for tertiary recovery. Over fifty commercial tertiary projects are operating in the Province of Alberta, the majority being hydrocarbon miscible floods in carbonate reservoirs (Howes, 1988). Recovery factors for primary recovery of OOIP range from 0 - 50%, averaging about 19% for Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board, 1986). Secondary recovery involves pressure maintenance by injection of water or gas. At the economic limit of waterflood recovery, from 2 5 - 45% OOIP has been recovered with an average recovery of 32%. The waterflood displacement efficiency, or the portion of the original oil saturation that can be recovered from rock that is flooded by injected water, ranges from 4 0 - 70%. The volumetric sweep efficiency or portion of the total reservoir volume that is contacted by injected water ranges from 2 0 - 90% (Howes, 1988).
Miscible solvent flooding Miscible flooding is the main commercially applied method of tertiary recovery for light and medium gravity oil in Canada. Where solvent is miscible with in-place oil, interfacial forces are reduced to zero and displacement efficiency is nearly 100%. However, solvent is less viscous and more mobile than the oil being displaced and sweep efficiency may be low because of bypassing of oil by viscous fingering. Also, the low-density solvent tends to move to the top of the reservoir and override oil in the case of horizontal solvent floods. Sweep efficiency is related to the volume of solvent injected, but economic factors place limits on this volume. In Canada, the main solvents in commercial use are hydrocarbons in contrast to the USA, where carbon dioxide is the common solvent. Vertical solvent floods have higher average recoveries (Fig. 10-17), because the effects of both viscous fingering and gravity override are reduced where the solventoil interface is approximately horizontal and being driven vertically downward. In these gravity stabilized floods, the main impediment to efficient recovery is the presence of horizontal permeability barriers on which solvent and oil may be bypassed during downward advance of the flood front. In horizontal miscible floods, water can be injected alternately with solvent and with chase gas in a water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection which reduces the mobility of the injected fluids and reduces viscous fingering and gravity override.
896
H
-
C SOLVENT FLOODS, CARBONATES, ALBERTA 12 -
-
VERTICAL (37)/ M E A N 74
10 >"
8
uJ
6
o z 0
UJ
4
U. 2 0 40
50
60
70
80
90
100
U L T I M A T E RECOVERY, % O 0 1 P
Fig. 10-17. Ultimate recovery for 37 vertical hydrocarbon solvent floods have a mean of 74% OOIP compared with mean of 53% OOIP for 8 horizontal solvent floods. All floods are for carbonate reservoirs. Thirty-seven vertical solvent floods operating in Alberta have an average ultimate recovery factor of 74% OOIP, with standard deviation of 8%, which is significantly higher than the average ultimate recovery 53% OOIE with a standard deviation of 4% for 8 horizontal solvent floods (Howes, 1988) (Fig. 10-17). The average ultimate recovery factor of 59% OOIP for all solvent floods compares favorably with the average ultimate recovery of 32% for Alberta waterfloods. In vertical floods, the incremental recovery from miscible injection over waterflood recovery ranges from 1 5 - 40% OOIE In horizontal floods, the incremental recovery is smaller, being between 5 - 20% (Howes, 1988). The vertical floods have an area to pay thickness (height of oil column) ratio of less than 14 hectares per meter and, in most cases, the ratio was less than 2 hectares per meter. The horizontal solvent floods have equivalent ratios of greater than 70 hectares per meter.
Immiscible gas flooding Westerose Field, Alberta, is an Upper Devonian dolomitized stromatoporoid reef with vug-fracture porosity. The original oil column was 74 m thick and was overlain by a 117-m gas cap (Bachman et al., 1988). The area-to-thickness ratio is 3.4 hectares per meter and the reservoir is being produced by an immiscible gas recycling scheme in which the water-oil contact is maintained in its original position. Since discovery, 67% OOIP has been produced and the ultimate recovery of oil is estimated as 84% OOIE This is a higher recovery factor than the average for the vertical miscible floods (75% OOIP). The absence of extensive horizontal permeability barriers within the reef, particularly in the reef interior area, facilitates high recovery. Although the matrix porosity is low (~ 4%), the vugs appear to be well connected throughout the reef by fractures and solution channels, and displacement of oil by gas is efficient. Oil
897 which is bypassed by advancing gas can drain by gravity and, provided the drainage rate for bypassed oil is large in relation to the rate at which the gas-oil contact is being driven down (contact movement ~ 1 cm per day), this oil can rejoin the main oil bank and be produced (Yang et al., 1990). Methane gas rather than nitrogen was used for the gas cycling scheme here following a multi-component mathematical characterization of the reservoir fluids and a field history match via a numerical reservoir simulator. Forecasts were generated for various gas injection schemes, and injection of nitrogen was found to cause significantly more coning in the oil leg because of its higher density. In a case such as this, one can ask how much additional oil would have been recovered had a solvent bank been emplaced and a miscible flood conducted. An attempt to answer this question was made by comparing recoveries from immiscible and miscible gas floods. Unfortunately, although there are some 23 carbonate reservoirs with associated gas caps in western Canada, vertical immiscible floods have been utilized only in two. These are Westerose and Bonnie Glen fields with recoveries of 84% and 68% OOIE respectively. Thus, there are insufficient cases of vertical immiscible gas drives for a comparison to be made. Because no two reservoirs are the same, it is difficult to make comparisons on an individual basis. However, the Wizard Lake D3A Pool, Alberta, is in geographic proximity and of a generally similar size and reef type and has been subjected to miscible floods (Backmeyer et al., 1984). The ultimate recovery here is estimated at 96% OOIP based on a 1.5 m "sandwich loss" (final oil layer not recoverable because of coning) at the end of flood, compared with the 84% OOIP for the Westerose Field vertical immiscible flood. The Wizard Lake Field recovery will be achieved with solvent slugs which total 15% of the hydrocarbon pore volume subject to solvent displacement. Compared with Westerose Field, an additional 12% pore volume of oil is being recovered from Wizard Lake by injecting 15% pore volume of solvent. This assumes that the entire Wizard Lake reservoir is subject to solvent flooding. The percentage of the solvent recovered is not specified. Evidence is also available from sandstone reservoirs of high recoveries under immiscible gas drive with gravity drainage. In the Hawkins Field, East Texas, recovery efficiency for gas drive is estimated at over 80% compared with about 50% for water drive (Carlson, 1988). This study showed that the minimum residual oil saturation from gas displacement of water-invaded oil column is essentially the same as that from gas displacement of original oil column. Thus, in reservoirs of the Hawkins type, potential exists for reducing the average residual oil saturation in the water invaded oil column by gas d r i v e - gravity drainage. Experiments by Brandner and Slotboom (1974), in physical models of vuggy carbonates, indicate that initial upward displacement of oil by water may be reversible during subsequent downward movement of oil. Water was the wetting phase in these scaled models. They concluded that vertical gas floods could be expected to give similar ultimate oil recovery with or without preceding waterfloods under the conditions of their experiments. Immiscible gas injection into a reservoir at residual oil saturation following waterflooding causes oil to spread at gas-water interfaces. As critical gas saturation is
898 reached and gas has continuity through the system, oil continuity is re-established and oil production can recommence. In reservoirs with large vertical to horizontal dimensions, oil recovery is further aided by gravity drainage of the denser oil in the presence of the less dense gas. Gravity-assisted immiscible gas injection has been the subject of several recent papers (Chatzis et al., 1988; Kantzas et al., 1988; King et al., 1970). In summary, horizontal and vertical solvent flooding are proven methods of enhanced oil recovery with vertical floods giving, on average, approximately 20% OOIP more oil recovery than horizontal floods. Vertical immiscible gas floods also can give high oil recoveries, but insufficient cases are available to allow statistical comparisons with recoveries by miscible flooding. Horizontal permeability barriers are the major cause of lower recovery efficiencies for both miscible and immiscible gas floods. Unswept oil retained on horizontal permeability barriers has been substantiated, in some cases, by recompletion of wells above the pool-wide solvent/oil contact and by the subsequent production of"perched" oil bypassed by the solvent front (Bilozir and Frydl, 1989). In the case of vertical floods, it is important that "sandwich loss" be minimized by reducing coning to a minimum consistent with an acceptable production rate, and simulation models have proved valuable in achieving this.
CONCLUSIONS
The recovery of oil from a reservoir is the product of the microscopic displacement efficiency in the rocks contacted by the displacing fluid and the volumetric sweep efficiency, that is the fraction of the total reservoir volume that is contacted by injected fluids. Thus, residual oil at the end of secondary recovery is of two types: (1) residual oil trapped on small (microscopic) scale in the swept portion of the reservoir; and (2) residual oil bypassed in larger regions which are unswept. Residual oil in the former category may be recovered by solvent floods, or other tertiary methods, utilizing existing injection and production wells, whereas residual oil in the latter category may require infill wells to access unswept regions. Volumetric sweep efficiency may be inferred if the microscopic displacement efficiency is known from core displacement tests on representative samples and if the ultimate recovery of the reservoir can be estimated by extrapolation of decline curves or, alternatively, by analogy with other similar reservoirs at more advanced stages of production. Neither method is satisfactory because long production time may be required before extrapolations to a recovery limit can be made reliably from pressure decline curves. Also, pressure decline curves reflect the effects of fluid and rock expansion and phase behavior related to substantial pressure changes, which usually are not incorporated in laboratory flood tests. That is, it may not be justifiable to "back out" volumetric sweep from Eq. 10-1. Alternatively, suitable analogues produced to economic limits may not be available. Field surveillance programs, such as temperature surveys, tracer surveys, flowmeter and noise logs and pressure transient well tests, are expensive to implement,
899 but provide indirect methods of estimating volumetric sweep efficiency and furnish a basis for injection balancing and optimizing sweep efficiency. These tests, if well chosen, usually repay their cost many times over. A further approach is to use a reservoir model and to simulate physical processes within the reservoir in order to forecast the rates and proportions of fluid recovery under various production schemes and well-placement patterns. Several of the petrophysical properties used in such models (porosity, permeability, relative permeability-saturation relationships) are measured at the core scale and have to be averaged to represent flow and displacement at larger (reservoir grid block) scales. Such averaging requires information about the spatial arrangement of reservoir units with differing properties (heterogeneity) and may be difficult because heterogeneity may occur on several different scales in a "nested" manner. The types, degrees and scales of heterogeneity present the most difficult problems for quantitative reservoir characterization. The success of various methods of averaging core scale measurements to represent permeability at larger scales can be evaluated by comparing estimates made from appropriately averaged core measurements with those derived from in-situ pressure transient well tests. Few published data of this type are available, but the indications are that correlations to date are poor and that averaging core data to represent flow at larger scales is, as yet, subject to considerable error. Numerical reservoir simulators can match past performance, usually after several changes of parameters, but have been less successful in making predictions about future performance, particularly for enhanced oil recovery schemes. Predictions concerning ultimate recoverable reserves, which are made early in the production history of a reservoir, have been notoriously in error. This is usually because some aspect of the "container" has not been correctly modelled. Further progress in predicting performance will require increased resolution of reservoir flow units. This will be achieved through better integration of higher resolution seismic methods and geological data with new in-situ pressure tests.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer is grateful to Drs. S.J. Mazzullo, G.V. Chilingarian and R.J. Galway for their editorial and critical comments on the original version of the manuscript.
REFERENCES Aguilera, R., 1980. Naturally fractured reservoirs. Petroleum Publishing Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 703 pp. Anderson, W.G., 1986. Wettability literature survey, part 2 - wettability measurement. J. Petrol. Tech., 38: 1246- 1262. Araktingi, U.G., Bashore, W.M. and Tran, T.T.B., 1991. Integration of seismic and well log data in reservoir modelling. In: T.E. Burchfield and T.C. Wesson (Chairmen), 3rd International Reservoir Characterization Technical Conference, DOE Conf.-911125, 3RC-01-40:1 - 40. Aufricht, W.R., 1968. The relationship of reservoir permeability to measured laboratory permeability. Canadian Well Logging Soc. J., 1:15 - 29.
900 Bachman, R.C., Pabst, W. and Legere, R.F., 1988. Investigation of gas cycling schemes for the Westerose D-3 pool, J. Canad. Petrol. Technol., 2 7 : 3 3 - 4 0 . Bachu, S. and Underschultz, J.R., 1992. Regional-scale porosity and permeability variations, Peace River Arch Area, Alberta Canada. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 76:547 - 562. Backmeyer, L.A., Guise, D.R., MacDonell, P.E. and Nute, A.J., 1984. The tertiary extension of the Wizard Lake D-3A pool miscible flood. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, 59th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, SPE Paper 13271. Bebout, D.G. and Pendexter, C., 1975. Secondary carbonate porosity as related to early tertiary depositional facies. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 59:665 - 693. Beliveau, D., Payne, D.A. and Mundry, M., 1991. Analysis of the waterflood response of a naturally fractured reservoir. Soc. Petrol. Engineers, 66th Annual Technical Conference, Dallas, SPE 22946: 603 -626. Bell, J.S., 1989. Case studies in Canadian petroleum geology - vertical migration of hydrocarbons at Alma, offshore Eastern Canada. Bull. Canad. Petrol. Geol., 37: 3 5 8 - 364. Bilozir, D.E. and Frydl, P.M., 1989. Reservoir description and performance analysis of a mature miscible flood in Rainbow Field, Canada, 64 Annual Tech. Conf., San Antonio, Oct., SPE 19656, 15 pp. Brandner, C.F. and Slotboom, R.A., 1975. Vertical immiscible displacement experiments in a non-homogeneous flow cell. J. Canad. Petrol. Technol., 14(1): 2 7 - 3 3 . Buckley, J.S., Takamura, K. and Morrow, N.R., 1989. Influence of electrical surface charges on the wetting properties of crude oils. SPE Reservoir Eng., 4: 3 3 2 - 340. Cardwell, W.T. and Parsons, R.L., 1945. Average permeabilities of heterogeneous oil sands. Trans. AIME, 160:34 - 42. Carlson, L.O., 1988. Performance of Hawkins Field Unit under gas drive-pressure maintenance operations and development of an EOR Recovery Project, SPE/DOE 17324,EOR Symposium, Tulsa, pp. 49 -58. Chatzis, I., Kantzas, A. and Dullien, F.A.L., 1988. On the investigation of gravity assisted inert gas injection using micromodels, long Berea cores and computer assisted tomography. Presented at the 63rd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Soc. of Petrol. Eng., Houston, SPE 18284. Chilingar, G.V. and Yen, T.F., 1983. Some notes on wettability and relative permeabilities of carbonate rocks, II. Energy Sources, 7(1): 6 7 - 75. Chilingar, G.V., Mannon, R.W. and Rieke, H.H., 1972. Oil and gas production from carbonate rocks. American Elsevier, New York, 408 pp. Chuoke, R.L., van Meurs, P. and van der Poel, C., 1959. The instability of slow, immiscible, viscous liquid-liquid displacements in permeable media. Petroleum Trans. AIME, 2 1 6 : 1 8 8 - 194. Craig, F.F., 1971. The reservoir engineering aspects ofwaterflooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, Henry L. Doherty Series, Monograph Volume 3. A.I.M.E., New York, 141 pp. Delaney, R.P. and Tsang, P.B., 1981. Reservoir continuity study at Judy Creek, a synergy story. Petrol. Soc. of the Canad. Inst. of Min. and Metal., 32nd Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, Paper No. 81-32-5. Dullien, EA.L., Lai, F.S.Y. and Macdonald, I.F., 1986. Hydraulic continuity of residual wetting phase in porous media. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 109:201 - 218. Ehrlich, R. and Full, W.E., 1988. Sorting out geology-unmixing mixtures. In: J. Mann, R. McCammon and T. Jones (Editors). Use and Abuse of Statistical Methods of the Earth Sciences, Oxford University Press, 275 pp. Ehrlich, R., Crabtree, S.J., Kennedy, S.K. and Cannon, R.L.,1984. Petrographic image analysis of reservoir pore complexes. J. Sedimentary Petrol, 54:1365 - 1378. Energy Resources Conservation Board, 1986.Alberta's Reserves of Crude Oil, Gas, Natural Gas Liquids and Sulphur, Calgary, Alberta, ERCB Rept. 8 7 - 18. Energy Resources Conservation Board, 1987. Alberta's reserves of crude oil, oil sands, gas, natural gas liquids and sulphur. ERCB Reserves Report Series, ERCB-18, Calgary, Alberta, ST88:15 pp. Fogg, G.E. and Lucia, F.J., 1990. Reservoir modeling of restricted platform carbonates: geologic characterization of interwell-scale reservoir heterogeneity, Dune Field, Crane County, Texas. The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations, No. 190:66 pp. Fogg, G.E., Lucia, EJ. and Senger, R.K., 1990. Stochastic simulation of interwell heterogeneity for
901 improved prediction of sweep efficiency in a carbonate reservoir. In: L.W. Lake, H.B. Carroll, Jr. and T.C. Wesson, (Editors), Reservoir Characterization II, San Diego, California, Academic Press, pp. 355-381. Ghauri, W.K., Osbome, A.F. and Magnuson, W.L., 1974. Changing concepts in carbonate waterflooding, West Texas Denver Unit project- an illustrative example. J. Petrol. Tech., 26:595 - 606. Haldorsen, H.H. and Damsleth, E., 1984. Challenges in reservoir characterization research- which frogs deserve to be kissed. Advances in Reservoir Technology, Edinburgh, 23 pp. Haldorsen, H.H. and Lake, L.W., 1984. A new approach to shale management in field scale models. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 24: 4 4 7 - 457. Harbaugh, J.W., 1967. Carbonate oil reservoir rocks. In: G.V. Chilingar, H.J. Bissell and R.W. Fairbridge (Editors), Carbonate Rocks, Origin, Occurrence and Classification, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 3 4 9 398. Havlena, D., 1966. Interpretation averaging and use of the basic geological-engineering data. J. Canad. Petrol. Tech., 5: 153 - 164. Howes, B.J., 1988. Enhanced oil recovery in Canada. J. Canad. Petrol. Tech., 27: 8 0 - 88. Jardine, D. and Wilshart, J.W., 1982. Carbonate reservoir description. International Technical Symposium SPE, Bejing, China, SPE 10010, 34 pp. Jensen, J.L., Hinkley, D.V. and Lake, L.W., 1987. A statistical study of reservoir permeability: distributions, correlations and averages. Soc. of Petrol. Eng. Formation Evaluation, Dec.: 461 - 4 6 8 . Joumel, A.G. and Huijbregts, Ch.J., 1978. Mining Geostatistics. New York, Academic Press, 600 pp. Kantzas, A. Chatzis, I. and Dullien, F.A.L., 1988. Enhanced Oil Recovery by Inert Gas Injection. SPE/ DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, Tulsa, SPE Paper 17379. Keelan, D.K., 1972. A critical review of core analysis techniques. J. Canad. Petrol. Tech., 11: 4 2 - 55. King, R.L., Stiles, J.H. Jr. and Waggoner, J.M., 1970. A reservoir study of the Hawkins Woodbine Field. Soc. Petrol. Eng. 45th Annual Fall Meeting, Houston, Texas, SPE Paper 2927. Laidlaw, W.G. and Wardlaw, N.C., 1983. A theoretical and experimental investigation of trapping in pore doublets. Canad. J. Chem. Eng., 61 : 719 - 727. Lake, L., 1989. Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 550 pp. Lake, L. and Carroll, H.B., 1986. Reservoir Characterization, Academic Press, 659 pp. Langston, E.E, 1976. Field application of pressure buildup tests Jay-Little Escambia Creek Fields. Soc. Petrol. Eng. 51st Annual Tech. Conf., New Orleans, SPE 6199, 12 pp. Langston, E.P., Shirer, J.A. and Nelson, D.E., 1981. Innovative reservoir management- key to highly successful Jay/LEC waterflood. J. Petrol. Tech., 33:783 - 791. Lapre, J.F., 1980. Reservoir potential as a function of the geological setting of carbonate rocks. Soc. Petrol. Eng., SPE 9246. Lasseter, T.J., Waggoner, J.R. and Lake, L.W., 1986. Reservoir heterogeneities and their influence on ultimate recovery. In: L.W. Lake and H.B. Carroll (Editors), Reservoir Characterization, Academic Press, pp. 5 4 5 - 559. Lefebvre du Prey, E.J., 1973. Factors affecting liquid-liquid relative permeability of a consolidated porous medium. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 13: 3 9 - 4 7 . Li, Y. and Wardlaw, N.C., 1990. Quantitative determination of pore structure from capillary pressure curves. In: N. Morrow (Editor), Interfacial Phenomena in Petroleum Recovery, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 1 - 156. Li, Y. and Wardlaw, N.C., 1986A. The influence of wettability and critical pore throat size ratio on snapoff. J. Colloid and Interface Science, 109:461 - 272. Li, Y. and Wardlaw, N.C., 1986B. Mechanisms of non-wetting phase trapping during imbibition at slow rates. J. Colloid and Interface Science, 109:473 - 486. Lishman, J.R., 1969. Core permeability anisotropy. Petroleum Society of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 20th Annual Technical Meeting, Edmonton, Alberta, Paper No. 6920. Lucia, F. and Murray, R.C., 1967. Origin and Distribution of Porosity in Crinoidal Rock. Preprint of Proc. of the 7th World Petrol. Cong., Mexico, 2:409 pp. Mazzullo, S.J. and Chilingarian, G.V., 1992. Depositional models of carbonate reservoirs. In G.V. Chilingarian et al. (Editors), Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: a Geologic-Engineering Analysis, Part 1, Elsevier, New York, pp. 1 0 9 - 198. McGill, C., King, E and Williams, J., 1991. Estimating effective permeability: a comparison of tech-
902 niques. In: T.E. Burchfield and T.C. Wesson (Chairmen), 3rd International Reservoir Characterization Technical Conference, DOE-911125, 3RC-31-36. McNamara, L.B. and Wardlaw, N.C., 1991. Reservoir geology of the Westerose Field Alberta. Bull. Canad. Petrol. Geol., 39: 3 3 2 - 351. Menzie, D.E., 1989. Dispersivity as an Oil Reservoir Rock Characteristic. In: Enhanced Oil Recovery Progress Review, DOE/BC-88/1, Bartlesville, Oklahoma, pp. 8 6 - 89. Moore, C.H., 1989. Carbonate diagenesis and porosity. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 338 pp. Moore, P.J.R.McD., 1989. Barque and C l i p p e r - well test analysis in low permeability fractured gas reservoirs. SPE Low Permeability Reservoir Symposium, Denver, CO, 34 pp. Morrow, N.R., 1979. Interplay of capillary viscous and buoyancy forces in the mobilization of residual oil. ,1. Canad. Petrol. Tech., 18: 3 5 - 4 6 . Morrow, N.R., 1971. Small scale packing heterogeneities in porous sedimentary rocks. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., 55: 5 1 4 - 522. Mungan, N., 1966. Certain wettability effects in laboratory waterfloods. J. Petrol. Tech., 18:247 - 252. Peters, E.J. and Flock D.L., 1981. The onset of instability during two-phase immiscible displacement in porous media. Soc. Petrol. Eng. dr., 21:249 - 258. Reiss, L.H., 1980. The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Fractured Formations. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, 108 pp. Richardson, J.G., Sangree J.B. and Sneider, R.M., 1987. Permeability distributions in reservoirs. ,1. Petrol. Technol., 39: 1197- 1199. Salathiel, R.A., 1973. Oil recovery by surface film drainage in mixed-wettability rocks.,/. Petrol. Technol., 25: 1 2 1 6 - 1224. Schechter, D.S., Zhou, D. and Orr, F.M., 1991. Capillary imbibition and gravity segregation in low IFT systems. 66th Annual Technical Conference, Soc. Petrol. Eng., Dallas, Texas, SPE 22594, pp. 7 1 - 8 1 . Senger, R.K., Lucia, F.J., Kerans, C. and Ferris, M.A., 1991. Dominant control on reservoir-flow behaviour in carbonate reservoirs as determined from outcrop studies. In: T.E. Burchfield and T.C. Wesson (Chairmen), 3rd International Reservoir Characterization Technical Conference, DOE Conf. - 911125: 5 8 - 101. Stalkup, EI., 1983. Miscible displacement. Soc. Petrol. Eng. AIME Monograph Series, 204 pp. Stiles, L.H., 1976. Optimizing waterflood recovery in a mature waterflood, the Fullerton Clearfork Unit, SPE paper 6198. Stiles, L.H. and George, C.P., 1977. Improved techniques for evaluating carbonate waterfloods in West Texas. SPE paper 6739. Srivastava, R.M. and Parker, H.M., 1989. Robust measures of spatial continuity. In: M. Armstrong (Editor), Geostatistics, Vol. 1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 295 - 308. Thomas, G.E. and Glaister, R.P., 1960. Facies and porosity relationships in some Mississippian carbonate cycles of Western Canada Basin, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 44:569 - 588. Treiber, L.E., Archer, D.L. and Owens, W.W., 1972. A laboratory evaluation of the wettability of fifty oil-producing reservoirs. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 6:531 - 540. Van de Graaf, W.J.E. and Ealey, P.J., 1989. Geological modeling for simulation studies. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 11: 1436 - 1444. Wardlaw, N.C., 1976. Pore geometry of carbonate rocks as revealed by pore casts and capillary pressure. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 60:245 - 257. Wardlaw, N.C., 1980. The effects of pore structure on displacement efficiency in reservoir rocks and in glass micromodels. 1st SPE/DOE Symposium on EOR, Tulsa, Oklahoma, SPE 8843, pp. 345 - 352. Wardlaw, N.C., 1982. The effects of geometry, wettability, viscosity and interfacial tension on trapping in single pore-throat pairs. J. Canad. Petrol. Technol., 21:21 - 27. Wardlaw, N.C., 1990. Characterization of carbonate reservoirs for enhanced oil recovery. National Oil Corporation, Tripoli, Libya, Paper 90-01-05:85 - 105. Wardlaw, N.C., 1989. Quantitative determination of pore structure and application to fluid displacement in reservoir rocks. 2nd International ConferenceNorth Sea Oil and Gas Reservoirs, Trondheim, Norway. Graham and Trotman Ltd., London, pp. 2 2 9 - 244. Wardlaw, N.C. and Cassan, J.P., 1978. Estimation of recovery efficiency by visual observation of pore systems in reservoir rocks. Bull. Canad. Petrol. Geol., 26:572 - 585. Wardlaw, N.C. and Cassan, J.P., 1979. Oil recovery efficiency and the rock-pore properties of some sandstone reservoirs. Bull. Canad. Petrol. Geol., 2 7 : 1 1 7 - 138.
903
Warren, J.E. and Price, H.S., 1961. Flow in heterogeneous porous media. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 1(3): 153 169. Weber, K.J., 1986. How heterogeneity affects oil recovery. In: L.W. Lake and H.B. Carroll (Editors), Reservoir Characterization, Academic Press, pp. 4 8 7 - 544. West, L.W. and Doyle-Read, F.M., 1988. A synergistic evolution of the Norman Wells reservoir description. J. Canad. Petrol. Technol., 27: 9 6 - 103. Yang, D., Wardlaw, N.C. and McKellar, M., 1990. Free gravity drainage of liquids in physical models and core. AOSTRA J. Research, 6(2): 123 - 139. -
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
905
Appendix A GLOSSARY OF SELECTED G E O L O G I C TERMS S.J. M A Z Z U L L O and G.V. CHILINGARIAN
A Abiogenic Accretion [sed] Aerobic
Aggradation [sed] Allochem Allochthonous [sed]
Argillaceous Atoll
Authigenic
Autochthonous [sed]
Products (minerals, sediments, or rocks) resulting from inorganic processes of formation. Cf: biogenic. Vertical buildup or lateral extension of deposits as a consequence of sedimentation or biotic activities. Physical, organic, or chemical processes operative in, or said of products formed in, the presence of oxygen. Cf: anaerobic, anoxic. Vertical accumulation of deposits as a consequence of sedimentation or biotic activities. Cf: degradation. Carbonate particle of either skeletal or non-skeletal origin. Sediments or rocks formed elsewhere than where they are ultimately deposited; of foreign or introduced origin. Syn: allogenous. Containing clay minerals as impurities in carbonate, siliciclastic, or evaporitic sediments. A ring-shaped reef, circular or elliptical or horseshoeshaped, generally encircling an interior lagoon, and surrounded by deeper water. Formed or generated in place; specifically said of minerals that have precipitated in place or which have replaced other minerals or particles in various diagenetic environments. Said of sediments or rocks that have accumulated in place. Cf: allochthonous, allogenous. Syn: autogenous. B
Backstepping [sed]
Baffiestone
Bank [sed]
Referring to carbonate platforms that are being eroded or tectonically drowned such that their areal dimensions are progressively reduced in a landward direction. Reef rock that has accumulated as a result of the trapping or baffling of sediments amidst in-place organic frameworks. Limestone deposits consisting of skeletal matter formed by in-place organisms, or sediments deposited.
906
Barrier reef [sed]
Bindstone
Bioclastic Bioerosion
Biofacies [ecol] Biogenic Bioherm
Biolithite
Biostrome Biota Bioturbation
Bitumen
Boundstone
Brecciation
generally in shallow water; in both cases the deposit may be surrounded by deeper water. Long, linear reef oriented roughly parallel to shoreline and separated from it at some distance by a lagoon of considerable depth and width; generally occur along the margins of shallow-water platforms, and pass seaward into deeper-water environments. Reef rock that has accumulated as a result of the presence of tabular or lamellar fossils that entrusted or otherwise bound sediments during deposition. Partial syn: boundstone, biolithite. Skeletal-derived sediments. Syn: biogenic, skeletal, organic. Removal of generally consolidated sediments by the boring, scraping, chewing, and rasping activities of organisms. Distinctive assemblages of organisms formed at the same time but under different environmental conditions. Sediments or rocks, or mineral deposits whose origin is related to organic activity. Syn: organic. Mass of rock with varying amounts of topographic relief above the sea floor that has been constructed by organisms. General term for reef rocks that have accumulated as a result of the activity of organisms. Partial syn: boundstone. Bedded and widely extensive, or broadly lenticular, blanket-like mass of rock constructed by organisms. All organisms that are living or have lived in an area, including animals and plants. The disruption of sedimentary strata and included sedimentary/biotic structures by the burrowing or grazing activities of organisms. Syn: burrow mottling. A generic term for natural, inflammable substances that are composed of a mixture of hydrocarbons that are substantially free of oxygenated bodies. Great confusion exists in the literature on the definition of the term Bitumen. See T.F. Yen and George V. Chilingarian, 1994. Asphaltenes andAsphalts. Elsevier, Amsterdam, for definitions of bitumen, bitumoid, etc. General term for reef rock that has accumulated as a result of the activity of organisms; or non-reef rock that has accumulated as a result of extensive syndepositional marine lithification. Disruption of strata, and development of fitted clasts
907
Buildup [organic] Buried hill
separated by fractures or of chaotic clasts with or without matrix, formed as a result of tectonism, carbonate dissolution and collapse, or evaporite dissolution and collapse. General term for reefal accumulation. Relict hill topography resulting from erosion, or specifically, karst weathering of carbonate terranes. Buried hills commonly composed hydrocarbon traps in karsted carbonate rocks. C
Calcite/Aragonite Compensation Depth Caliche
Calichification Caprock [petrol] Catagenesis
Cement
Chalk Circumgranular [sed] Clastic [sed]
Coated grain
Coccolith
Depth in the sea below which the rate of calcite or aragonite dissolution exceeds their rates of deposition. Authigenic deposit of calcium carbonate, generally low-magnesian calcite, that forms at the expense of (i.e., replacing) preexisting sediments, soils, or rocks. Syn: soilstone crusts, calcrete. Term describing the process of caliche or calcrete formation. An impervious body of rock that forms a vertical seal against hydrocarbon migration. Term applied to changes in existing sediments, or most commonly, rocks during deep burial at elevated temperatures and pressures short of metamorphism. Adj: catagenetic. Syn: mesogenesis, epigenesis. Naturally occurring (biogenic or abiogenic) precipitate of mineral material, usually calcite, aragonite, or dolomite in carbonate rocks, that binds particles together into a lithified framework. Carbonate rock of low-magnesian calcite composition composed dominantly of the remains of coccoliths and coccospheres. Cement which completely lines the pores in a rock. Syn: isopachous. Term used in reference to particles (carbonate, siliciclastic, or other mineralogies) that commonly are transported by fluids. Partial syn: hydroclastic. Carbonate particle consisting of nuclear fragment surrounded by cortex of chemically precipitated carbonate (e.g., ooids, pisoliths) or cortex composed of organic encrustation (e.g., oncolites, rhodolites). A button-like plate composed of calcium carbonate, generally about 3 microns in diameter, a number of which compose the outer skeletal remains of
908
Collapse breccia
Compaction [sed]
Composite grain Connate [sed]
Cross-stratification
Cryptalgal Cryptocrystalline [sed]
Crystal silt
Cyanobacteria
Cyclic sedimentation
coccospheres (skeletons of marine, planktonic protists). Sedimentary breccia formed as a result of collapse of indurated strata due to dissolution of underlying strata, or commonly, cave-roof collapse. Reduction in bulk volume and/or thickness of a sedimentary deposit resulting from either physical processes of grain readjustment (closer packing) in response to an increased weight of overburden (mechanical compaction), or chemical processes such as dissolution, grain interpenetration, and stylolitization (chemical compaction). Aggregate carbonate grain composed of discrete particles bound together by cement or organic mucilage. In reference to evolved waters ultimately of marine origin that have been entrapped in sediment pores after their burial, and which have been out of contact with the atmosphere for an appreciable period of geologic time. Cf: meteoric. Layers or laminae of sedimentary rock deposited at angles to the horizontal (not exceeding the angle of repose in air or water) as a normal consequence of transport by air or water. Syn: cross-bedding. Term used in reference to a presumed algal or cynaobacterial origin of certain carbonate rocks. Term used in reference to crystal components (e.g., cements or architectural elements of shells) of very fine size, generally not resolvable without the use of at least a petrographic microscope; also said of a rock with such texture. Syn: microcrystalline, nannocrystalline. Internal sediments found in cavities in rocks, composed of silt-size particles of crystals; generally form as a result of partial dissolution of host rock/sediment or boring by organisms. Biological/geological term for blue-green algae (cyanophytes), the association of blue-green algae and bacteria, or the bacterial affinity of blue-green algae. Sedimentation involving a vertical repetition of rock types representative of distinct depositional environments. Syn: rhythmic sedimentation. D
Dedolomite Dedolomitization
Dolomite that has been replaced by calcite wherein the crystal form of the predecessor has been preserved. Process of replacement of dolomite by calcite with preservation of dolomite crystal form.
909 Deflation Depositional karst
Desiccation Detrital
Diagenesis
Diagenetic facies [carb]
Dissolution Dissolutionenlargement/enhancement
Dissolution-reprecipitation [carb]
Distally-fining [sed]
Doline
Dolomitization Dolostone Duricrust
Removal of loose, dry sediment by wind action. Term used in reference to various small-scale karst features (e.g., small dissolution caves and related speleothems and cave cements, dissolution-etched erosional surfaces) formed as a result of short periods of subaerial exposure during deposition. Loss of interstitial water from sediments as a result of drying. Term generally restricted to sediments derived from the erosion of preexisting rocks. Syn: terrigenous, siliciclastic. All chemical, physical, and biologic changes in sediments or rocks that have altered their original textures and mineralogies, operative from the time of their formation and deposition, exclusive of metamorphism. In carbonate studies, the term usually encompasses micritization, changes in mineralogy, cementation, recrystallization, dolomitization and dedolomitization, dissolution, etc. Adj: diagenetic. For various definitions of diagenesis found in the literature, see G. Larsen and G.V. Chilingar, 1979. Diagenesis in Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 579 pp. (Also Catagenesis.) An assemblage of rocks with similar diagenetic attributes or which have been affected by similar diagenetic histories. Process of dissolving substances. Syn: leaching. In porosity studies, the process of enlarging or otherwise enhancing the size of preexisting pores by dissolution. Common process of carbonate dissolution and void formation at the microscale or macroscale, followed by the precipitation of another mineral phase. A sequence of rocks wherein sediment size decreases either away from shore, toward deeper water (marine), or from the point of sediment input (marine or terrestrial). General term for a closed depression of dissolutional origin in an area of karst topography. Partial syn: sinkhole. Replacement of a preexisting carbonate sediment or rock by dolomite. Synonym for dolomite rock. General term for a hard crust (carbonate, silica,
910 ferruginous, or aluminous) on the surface of land or as a replacive layer in the upper horizons of soils. E
Emergence
Eogenetic
Eolian Epeiric sea
Epibionts Epigenesis
Eustatic Euxinic Extraclasts [carb]
Fabric [sed] Facies [gen]
Fenestrae
Term used in reference generally to subaerial exposure of newly-deposited sediments or buried rocks as a result of tectonic uplift, unroofing by weathering, or relative or eustatic sea level fall. All diagenetic processes operative from the time of sediment formation, including marine and meteoric processes, until the sediments or rocks ultimately are buried and away from the influence of surface and near-surface processes. Referring to processes and products of sediment transport, erosion, or deposition by wind. A shallow sea on a broad continental shelf or an inland sea covering large portions of a continent; in the latter case, commonly considered to be tideless. Partial syn: epicontinental. In reference to encrusting organisms or that population of organisms that has encrusted various substrate. Diagenetic processes that have occurred, and resulting products that have formed, in the deep burial environment. Adj: epigenetic. Syn: mesogenesis, catagenesis. C f: eogenetic. Rise or fall in sea level due to global changes in the volume of the oceans. Cf: relative sea level change. An environment of restricted circulation, with stagnant or anaerobic conditions. Particles derived from outside the basin of carbonate deposition. Cf: intraclasts.
The orientation, or lack of orientation, of the elements (particles, crystals, cements) in a sedimentary rock. Sum of all lithologic, biologic, and diagenetic attributes in a rock or sequence of rocks from which the origin and environment of deposition can be inferred. The term can be restricted to lithologic facies (lithofacies), depositional facies, biotic facies (biofacies), or diagenetic facies. General term for penecontemporaneously formed shrinkage pores or gas-bubble pores in rocks, both larger than interparticle pore spaces; includes "birdseyes" and larger pores such as sheetcracks. Also in reference to
911
Floatstone
Fluvial
Framebuilder Framestone
pore types in carbonate rocks (see Porosity terms). Adj: fenestral. Reef rock composed of matrix-supported organic particles, the particles being of allochthonous (transported) rather than in-place origin. In reference to sediments transported or deposited by rivers or streams, or rocks interpreted to have been deposited in rivers or streams. Syn: fluviatile. Organisms capable of creating massive, generally wave-resistant buildups. Reef rock that has formed as a result of the accumulation of large, in-place fossils that formed the actual framework of the deposits. G
Gilsonite
Grainstone
A black, shiny asphaltite, with conchoidal fracture and black streak, which is soluble in turpentine. Syn: uintahite, uintaite. Grain-supported carbonate rock textural type, generally mud-free. Syn: sparite. H
Hardground
Hemipelagic [sed] Hydrothermal Hypersaline
General term for a surficial or near-surficial layer of sediment that is cemented syndepositionally, close to or at the sediment-water interface. Deep sea sediments composed of the remains of pelagic organisms and a small amount of terrigenous material. Alteration of rocks or minerals by the action of heated waters. Sea water salinity elevated beyond values of normal salinity (e.g., greater than 34-38 o/oo); also used in reference to environments of excessively high salinity. I
Internal sediment
Interregional karst Interstitial Intrabasinal
Fine-grained sediment, including insoluble residue, that has collected in pores in sediments or rocks; such sediment is generated syndepositionally as a result of organic boring and micritization, or partial dissolution of soluble rocks. Widespread surface of karstification generally related to eustatic sea level fall or tectonic uplift. Interparticle (either pore space, cements, or fluids). Said of sediments or rocks formed within or derived from the basin of deposition. Cf: terrigenous.
912 Intracratonic Intrastratal Isopachous [sed]
Geologic features found on cratons, e.g., intracratonic basins, intracratonic seas. Formed or occurring within a given layer or layers. Syn: intraformational. Cement which completely lines the pores in a rock. Syn: circumgranular. K
Karst
Karst towers Kerogen
Lacustrine Leaching [sed] Lithification Lithoclast
Lithofacies Lithographic texture
Lithohydraulic unit Lithology Lysocline
Topography (surficial and subsurface) formed as a result of the dissolution of soluble rocks such as limestones, dolomites, and evaporites, and characterized by closed depressions, caves, and underground drainage. Residual hills in karsted terranes. Syn: buried hills. Insoluble organic matter (fossilized), which can be converted by distillation into petroleum products.
Pertaining to lakes or deposits of lakes. Pertaining to dissolution of soluble minerals or rocks. Partial syn: dissolution. Process of converting unconsolidated sediments to rocks by the addition of mineral cements. Syn: cementation. Mechanically or biogenically formed and deposited fragment (larger than 2 mm) of a weakly lithified sediment or rock, formed within the basin of deposition. Cf: extraclast. See Facies. Compact, dense, homogeneous and exceedingly finegrained rock with conchoidal or sub-conchoidal fracture. Partial syn: micrite, carbonate mudstone. Layer or layers of rock with uniform fluid-flow properties distinct from adjoining layers. Descriptive, physical characteristics of rocks. Depth in the ocean at which the rate of dissolution of calcium carbonate increases significantly. M
Matrix [sed]
Maturation
The continuous material (sediment, cement) composing rocks; the continuous material enclosing interstices in rocks. [petroleum] Term pertaining to the thermocatalytic state of hydrocarbons or hydrocarbon source material; [sed] term pertaining to the mineralogic composition of siliciclastic or carbonate rocks as they approach a pure
913
Maturity Megabreccias [sed] Meniscus [sed]
Mesogenetic Metastable [sed]
Meteoric Micrite
Micritization Microbial Microcrystalline Microfacies Microspar
Mimetic Monominerallic Mound
Mud [carb sed] Mudbank Mudstone
quartz or calcite end-member composition, respectively. In reference to maturation, above. Generally thick bodies composed of large blocks of rock that are randomly oriented. The hour-glass shape of interparticle cements precipitated from fluids held by attraction at grain-tograin contacts; usually indicative of cement precipitation in the vadose environment. Diagenetic changes in rocks occurring in the deep burial environment. Syn: catagenetic, epigenetic. Said of minerals that are unstable at certain temperatures and pressures, or in fluids of certain compositions. Partial syn: unstable. Water derived ultimately from rain; water of recent atmospheric origin. [sed] Particulate, fine-grained matrix of carbonate rocks, by various definitions, the particles being less than 20 microns or 4 microns in size; a carbonate rock textural type composed dominantly of mud. Syn: carbonate mudstone; [crystal] pertaining to carbonate crystal size less than 4 microns. Organic or inorganic process of converting preexisting carbonate cements or grains to micrite. Pertaining to the presence, activities, or products of microbes such as algae, bacteria, fungi, yeasts. See Cryptocrystalline; said of a rock with such a texture. Petrologic term for the features, composition, and appearance of rocks, or of specific diagenetic features, as identified in thin sections. Fabric of carbonate crystals resulting from recrystallization of micrite-size crystals or grains that range in size from 5 microns to about 30 microns in size. Process of replacement (e.g., during dolomitization) wherein precursor textures and fabrics are preserved. Composed of one mineral species. Organic or inorganic sediment buildup with low depositional relief; or organic buildup composed of nonframework building (but commonly gregarious), in-place organisms or allochthonous organisms. Fine-grained particles, by various definitions less than 20 microns or 4 microns in size. Syn: particulate micrite. Accumulation of mud. Carbonate rock textural type composed dominantly of mud (micrite) with less than 10% grains. Partial syn: micrite.
914 N Nannofossil Neomorphism
General term for small fossils, the resolution of which is near the limits of the light microscope. General carbonate petrologic term that encompasses both recrystallization (increase in crystal size in cases where mineralogy is constant) and inversion (crystal fabric changes attending mineralogic conversions). O
Occlusion Offiap
Oncolite
Onlap
Ooid
Ooze [sed]
Overburden [sed] Overpressuring/ overpressured reservoirs
In reference to porosity reduction as a typical consequence of cementation or compaction. Progressive offshore migration of the updip terminations of sedimentary beds within a conformable sequence of rocks. Cf: onlap. An accretionary carbonate particle composed of a particulate nucleus surrounded by a cortex of algae and entrapped sediment and/or precipitated cement. Progressive onshore migration of the updip terminations of sedimentary beds within a conformable sequence of rocks. Cf: offiap. An accretionary, sand-size carbonate particle composed of a particulate nucleus surrounded by a laminated cortex of microcrystalline calcium carbonate; oolite is the term commonly used for rocks composed of ooids. Partial syn: oolite, oolith. Soft, soupy mud generally composed of at least 30% skeletal remains of pelagic organisms (calcareous or siliceous), the remainder being clay minerals. Section of rocks overlying a given stratum or strata. Porous rocks characterized by greater than normal fluid pressures resulting, for example, from undercompaction due to rapid sedimentation. P
Packing [sed] Packstone Paleoenvironment Paleogeomorphic
Paleokarst Paleosol Pelagic
Three-dimensional arrangement of particles in a rock. Muddy, but grain-supported carbonate rock textural type. Ancient depositional (or diagenetic) environment. Term used in reference generally to a buried landscape; in reference to hydrocarbon reservoir traps in or along certain buried landscape features. Buried or relict karst. Fossilized soil. [oceanographic] Pertaining to open ocean water as an
915
Pellet Peloid
Pendant
Penecontemporaneous Periplatform
Peritidal
Permeability [geol] Petrophysics Phreatic
Pinnacle reef Pisolite
Planktonic Platform Playa Polycyclic Polygenetic Polyminerallic Polymorph [mini
Pore Porosity terms
environment; [sed] deep-sea sediments without terrigenous material (either inorganic red clays or organic oozes). A particle composed of fecal material. Partial syn: pelletoid, peloid. A cryptocrystalline carbonate particle of unrecognizable origin, most likely a completely micritized grain, less likely a fecal pellet. Partial syn: pellet. Cement fabric that is precipitated along the undersides of grains or cavities, usually indicative of precipitation in the vadose environment. Syn: stalactitic. Contemporaenous with deposition. Syn: syndepositional. Said of sediments or environments in deeper water immediately seaward of carbonate platforms, atolls, or banks. Inclusive term for supratidal and intertidal environments, or in some definitions, supratidal, intertidal, and upper subtidal environments. The ability of a medium to transmit fluids. The physical properties of reservoir rocks. Zone below the water table in an unconfined groundwater lens, or in an aquifer, where all the pores are filled with water. An isolated, long (thick), spire or column-shaped reef. An accretionary carbonate particle, usually larger than sand-size, composed of a particulate nucleus surrounded by a cortex, generally laminated, of precipitated calcium carbonate; term commonly used for rocks containing pisoids or pisoliths. Syn: pisolith, pisoid. In reference to pelagic organisms that float. A linear region of variable width of shallow-water calcium carbonate deposition. A desiccated, vegetation-free, fiat-floored area, commonly found in deserts, which represents a former shallow desert-lake basin. Syn: playa lake. Pertaining to more than one cycle of formation. Pertaining to an origin involving more than one process of formation, or superimposed processes of formation. Composed of more than one mineral. A mineral species with more than one crystal form, e.g., C a C O 3 calcite (hexagonal) and aragonite (orthorhombic). A hole, opening, or passageway in a rock. Syn: interstice. Fabric-selective porosity: pores that occur in regard to
916
Postdepositional Pressure- solution
Progradation
Protodolomite Pseudospar
specific elements in the rock. Cf: not fabric-selective; framework porosity: porosity in the matrix of rocks, exclusive of fractures. Syn: matrix porosity; porosityspecific: porosity occurrence within a given rock type or paleodepositional facies; pore system: the total petrophysical attributes of a porous unit; primary porosity: porosity inherited from the depositional environment. Cf: secondary porosity, that which develops after deposition as a result of dissolution. Physical or chemical changes in sediments or rocks after final deposition and burial. Process in which carbonate dissolution occurs at burial as a result of increased pressure due to overburden stress; usually results in the formation of stylolites and interpenetrative grain contacts. Syn: pressuredissolution. Tthe seaward accretion and migration of sedimentary bodies and corresponding depositional environments. Cf: regression. Term used in reference to dolomite that is poorly ordered and compositionally impure (i.e., calcic). Fabric of carbonate crystals, resulting from recrystallization of micrite-size crystals or grains, that are larger than 30 microns in size. R
Ramp Recrystallization Reef Regression
Replacement [crys] Resedimentation
Rhizoconcretion, rhizolith Rhodolite
A carbonate depositional surface that dips very gently (less than 1~ in a seaward direction, passing imperceptibly from shallow to deep water. Term that refers to an increase in the size of existing crystals without a change in mineralogy. An organic buildup. The landward migration of sedimentary bodies and corresponding depositional environments. Cf: progradation. Situation where one mineral replaces another mineral or rock, e.g., dolomitization, silicification. Refers to sediments, originally formed and deposited in one environment and subsequently transported to a completely different environment. An accumulation of calcium carbonate around plant roots. An accretionary carbonate particle, larger than sand-size, with or without a nucleus surrounded by a laminated to massive cortex constructed by red (rhodophyte) algae;
917
Rimmed shelf/platform
Rudstone
term used for rocks composed of rhodoliths. Syn: rhodolith, rhodoid. A shallow-water platform of deposition, the seaward edge of which is defined by a submarine topographic high constructed by carbonate sands or reef buildups. Reef rock composed of grain-supported texture of allochthonous (transported) rather than in-place organic particles. S
Sabkha
Saddle dolomite
Sapropel
Schizohaline Seal Sea-marginal
Shoal Silcrete Siliciclastic Skewness
Sorting [sed] Spar
Sparite Strand, strandline Stromatolite
A deflation flat developed in coastal, arid-zone environments, typically associated with evaporites, and inundated occasionally by sea water. Syn: sebkha. A conspicuous habit of dolomite, generally precipitated in high-temperature environments, characterized by curved crystal faces. Material composed of plant remains, most commonly algae, that is or has macerated and putrefied in an anaerobic environment: source material for petroleum and natural gas. Said of a water body or environment of fluctuating salinity. An impermeable bed that acts as a barrier to the vertical or lateral migration of hydrocarbons. Environments close to the sea, such as lagoons, tidal fiats, beaches; or deposits in these environments. Syn: marine-transitional. Area of shallow water. A soil-replacive or sand and gravel-replacive deposit composed of silica. In reference to terrigenous detrital sediment composed of silicate mineral grains. A statistical measure of the state of asymmetry shown by a frequency distribution curve that is bunched on one side of the mean and tails out on the other side. A measure of the spread or range of particle size distributions about the mean in a sediment population. Term for coarse crystalline calcite; commonly used in reference to precipitated cements, but may be used for coarse crystalline, recrystallized micrite. Syn: sparry. Grain-supported, mud-free carbonate rock textural type. Syn: grainstone. The zone of contact between the sea and land, commonly represented by beach deposits. A laminated organo-sedimentary deposit, either planar
918
Stylolite
Stylolitization Subaerial Subsidence Subunconformity Sucrosic
Sulfuric acid karst
Supraunconformity Syndepositional
or dome-shaped, constructed by the sediment trapping and binding activities, together with some amount of syndepositional lithification, of blue-green algae (cyanobacteria). A pressure-solution feature, generally formed in moderately to deeply-buried rocks, characterized by a thin seam or suture of irregular, interlocking, sawtoothed appearance. Process of stylolite formation. Referring to exposure on land, to meteoric fluids. Local or regional downwarping of a depositional surface due to tectonism or sediment loading. Position of strata beneath an unconformity. General, non-genetic term for coarse crystalline texture, used mostly in reference to dolomites; a porosity term referring to intercrystalline pores within coarse crystalline dolomites. Dissolution, generally of carbonate strata, by sulfuric acid generated from the oxidation of upward migrating, H2S-bearing fluids from depth. Position of strata directly above an unconformity. Physical, biologic, or diagenetic processes occurring during sediment deposition. Syn: penecontemporaneous, synsedimentary. T
Telogenesis
Terrigenous Texture [sed]
Tidal flat
Transgression
Diagenetic alteration in the subaerial meteoric environment of rocks that once were deeply buried. Adj: telogenetic. Sediments, typically siliciclastic, derived from the erosion on land of preexisting rocks. Syn: detrital. General physical appearance or characteristics of a rock, including parameters such as size, shape, sorting, and packing of constituent particles. Environment, and deposits therein, formed in the intertidal zone (including neighboring supratidal and upper subtidal environments and deposits). Syn: peritidal fiat. Inundation of land by the sea. The term transgressive is used in reference to sediments deposited during a transgression. U
Unconformity
A substantial break or gap in the geologic record where a rock unit is overlain by another that is not next in the
919
Upward-shoaling [sed]
stratigraphic succession. A vertical section of deposits that records continually decreasing paleowater depths. V
Vadose
That zone in an unconfined groundwater lens wherein the pores in the sediments are filled mostly with air. Cf: phreatic. W
Wackestone
A mud-supported carbonate rock textural type with greater than 10% particles.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
921 Appendix B
P E T R O L E U M ENGINEERING GLOSSARY J.O. ROBERTSON JR., G.V. CHILINGARIAN AND S.J. MAZZULLO
A Acidizing
fracture acidizing
matrix acidizing Air Balance Beam Air Drilling Alkanes (or paraffins)
Alkenes (see Olefins) Alkylation
Annular Space Aquifer Aromatics
API Gravity
The introduction of acid (hydrochloric, formic, and acetic, for carbonates; and hydrofluoric for sandstones) into a formation to dissolve rocks, thus opening passageways for fluids to flow through. Acid is injected into the formation at a high enough pressure to fracture the formation. The acid etches the new fracture. Enlargement of preexisting pores without fracturing. Acids can also enlarge (etch) the pre-existing fractures. Device using compressed air, rather than weights, to balance the weight of the sucker rods. Use of compressed air instead of liquid as the circulation medium in rotary drilling. Methane series, derived from petroleum, with carbon atoms arranged in a straight chain. It includes methane, ethane, propane, butane, pentane, hexane, heptane, and octane (C n Hzn+2). The reaction of alkenes or olefins with a branched chain alkane to form a branched, paraffinic hydrocarbon with high antiknock qualities. Space between the outside of the casing and the wellbore. A reservoir or portion of a reservoir containing water. Cyclic hydrocarbons found in oils. Contain a benzene ring nucleus in their structure, with a general formula of C n H2n_6. The standard method of expressing the gravity, or unit weight of oils. 141.5 oApI = ~ 131.5, SG60o
Automatic Tank Batteries
where SG6oo = the specific gravity at 60~ Lease tank batteries equipped with automatic measuring, gauging, and recording devices.
922 B
Ball Sealers Barefoot Barite Barrel Batch BPD, bbl/d or B/D Benzene
Bit Blowout
Blowout Preventer, BOP
Bottom Fraction Bottom Water Bridge Plug BS BS&W
Rubber balls dropped into a wellbore to plug perforations. Well completed without casing. A mineral often used as a component of drilling mud (or fluid) to add weight: barium sulphate, SG z 4.2 A unit of petroleum liquid measure equal to 42 gallons, US. A shipment of a particular product through a pipeline. Barrels per day. C6H6, an aromatic hydrocarbon found in petroleum. Used as a solvent for petroleum products. Used as a synonym for gasoline in many European countries. The rock cutting tool attached at the working end of the drilling string. Blowing out of gas and fluids when excessive well pressure exceeds the pressure of the drilling fluid head. Device consisting of a series of hydraulically controlled rams and inflatable bags to prevent the blowout of a well. This equipment allows control over volumes of fluid to be bled off from the wellbore through a choke manifold during drilling operations. There are several classifications of BOP. Heavier components of petroleum which remain after the lighter ends have been removed (distilled out). Water located at the bottom of reservoir. A mechanical device used to "seal-off" the wellbore below the point where it is set. Basic sediment. Basic sediment and water (often found at the bottom of tanks). C
Cable Tool Drilling Rig Capillary Action
Capillary Carbon Black Casing
A drilling device that uses percussion to make a hole. The upward and outward movement of fluids through the porous rock as a direct result of surface rock properties. (See Appendix C.) The minute openings between rock particles through which fluids are drawn. (See Appendix C.) A "soot" produced from natural gas. Pipe used to keep the wellbore walls from collapsing and to seal the borehole to prevent fluids outside the well from moving from one portion of the well to another.
923 Casinghead Gasoline Catalysis Catalyst Catalytic ("Cat") Cracking Cathead Cellar
Cement slurry
Cementing
primary cementing secondary cementing squeeze cementing Centralizers
Choke
Christmas Tree Circulation System Collapse Resistance Completion
Compressor
Conductor Contact Angle
"Natural gasoline" is condensate from natural gas. Process in which the chemical reaction rate is affected by the introduction of another substance (catalyst). A substance that is used to slow or advance the rate of a chemical reaction without being affected itself. Breaking down of petroleum compounds into various subcomponents. Spool-shaped hub on a winch shaft around which a rope may be snubbed. Area dug out beneath the drilling platform to allow room for installation of blowout prevention equipment (BOP). A mixture of cement and water in a liquid form which is pumped behind the casing. The slurry is allowed to set until it hardens. Pumping of the cement slurry down the casing and then back up the annular space between the casing and the borehole. The cementing operation where casing is cemented in the borehole. Cementing operations in wells after the well has been completed. Placing cement by squeezing it under pressure. Devices fitted around the outside of casing as it is lowered down in the borehole to keep it centered in the hole, to achieve a good cement job. A restriction in a flowline that causes a pressure drop or reduces the rate of flow through the orifice. It provides precise control of wellhead flow rates in surface production applications involving oil and gas and in enhanced recovery. Array of valves, pipes, and fittings placed at the top of the well, on the surface. Portion of the rotary drilling system which circulates the drilling fluid (mud). The minimum extemal pressure necessary to collapse casing or a pipe. Finishing a well. Installation of all necessary equipment to produce a well. Includes placing the casing, cementing and perforation opposite the productive zone. Mechanical device used for increasing the pressure of gases, similar to a pump which is used to increase the pressure of gases or liquids. First pipe in a drilling well used to attach to the BOP. The angle which the oil-water interface makes with
924 the solid (rock). Usually, it is measured from the solid through the liquid phase (if the other phase is a gas) and through the water phase if oil and water are both present, to the oil-water interface. (See Appendix C.) Core conventional sampling sidewall Corrosion Corrosion Inhibitor Cracking Cradling Critical Point (with corresponding critical temperature critical pressure) Crown Block Crude heavy crude light crude Cut
A sample of the rock taken from the well during drilling operations. Taking a sample of geological strata for examination. Cores generally one inch in diameter taken from the side of the wellbore, often by wireline. Chemical reaction (mainly loss of electrons) that oxidizes metals, e.g., Fe ~ Fe § +2e-. Chemicals added to inhibit corrosion of metals. Refinery process of breaking crude oil down into subcomponents. Lifting and placing the welded and wrapped pipeline into the trench. A point at which one phase cannot be distinguished from another, and the material cannot be condensed regardless of the amount of pressure applied. There is no volume change when a liquid is vaporized at the critical point. Pulley at the top of the drilling rig which raises and lowers the drill-string. Petroleum as it is produced from the formation. Thick (sticky) oil with an ~ gravity of less than 17~. Thin (light) oil with an ~ gravity greater than 25 ~ Percentage (by volume) of water associated with a particular crude oil. D
Daily Drilling Report Darcy (D) Derrickman Deviation Drillstem Test (DST)
Distillation
Records kept of the drilling activities, completed every morning while well is being drilled, by the toolpusher. Unit of measurement of permeability (ease of fluid movement), named after its originator, Henry D'Arcy. Member of drilling crew who handles the pipe joints and works on the tubing board of the rig. Directional change of wellbore from vertical. Drillstem test employs equipment which allows a well to flow for a short period of time, gathering information on reservoir fluids and the ability of the reservoir to produce fluids. Boiling off various fractions of an oil at different temperatures.
925 Doodlebug Doubles Draw-works Drillstring Driller Drilling Mud
Drilling Program Drilling Ship Drip Drive Mechanism
bottom water combination drive gas cap expansion
gravity drainage
solution gas water drive Dry Hole DWT Dynamic Positioning
"Doodlebug Crew" makes seismographic measurements. Two joints of pipe (casing, tubing) fitted together. The hoisting equipment of a drilling rig. A long continuous string of tubular goods of tubing, drill collars, bit, and subsurface tools. Person in charge of the drilling crew on each tour. Fluid composed of water or oil, clays, chemicals and weighting materials used to lubricate the bit and to move cuttings out of the hole. Plan for assembling all the personnel, equipment and supplies for drilling and completing a well. Vessel especially designed for offshore drilling operations. Device for tapping off natural gasoline at the wellhead. The natural force present in a reservoir which causes the fluid to move toward the wellbore, the action of one fluid pushing another. Underlying water in the reservoir exerts pressure moving fluids toward the wellbore. Two or three natural drives moving the fluid toward the wellbore. Expansion of the gas cap, located in the upper portion of the reservoir, upon reduction of reservoir pressure, forces fluids toward the wellbore. Gravity force results in movement of oil downward as the gas migrates upward. This force is strong in steeply dipping reservoirs. Gas bubbles dissolved in the oil push the latter towards the wellbore. Water (part of an aquifer) in the reservoir exerts the force to push fluids towards the wellbore. A well that fails to produce oil or g a s - syn: "Duster". Dead weight tons. Means of keeping a drillship positioned exactly above the drillsite by transmitting position signals from the ocean floor to the ship's thrusters. E
Edgewater
Water around the edge of a reservoir- water presses inward. Effective Pressure Grain-to-grain stress, which is equal to the total (Pe' Pg' or c') overburden pressure (p, or c) minus the pore (fluid) pressure, pp. Electric Submersible Pump, An electric submersible pump system comprising a
926 ESP Electrodrills Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
Elevators Enhanced Recovery
downhole pump, motor, power cable and surface control system. Rotary drills powered downhole by electricity. To determine the impact upon the surrounding environment, a detailed report is required by the Environmental Protection Agency before any major construction project can begin. Clamps for lifting rods, tubing and casing. Techniques that supplement the natural primary recovery mechanism to increase the flow of fluids to the wellbore. F
Flare Flow Fluid Loss Agent Formation Resistivity
Burning off excess natural gas at a well or other production site. Movement of fluids through the reservoir. Materials added to a drilling mud to reduce water loss into the formation. R F = o , where R is equal to the electrical resistivity R o w
Formation Volume Factor
(B)
Fourble Fraction
Fractionation Columns
Fracturing
fracture acidizing hydraulic fracturing
of a formation 100% saturated with formation water and R w is equal to the formation water resistivity. F = ~-~, where ~ is porosity and m is the cementation factor (varies from 1.3 for unconsolidated sands and oolitic limestones to 2.2 for dense dolomites). F embodies the effects of grain size, grain shape, grain distribution and grain packing. The volume of oil (and the solution gas dissolved in it) at reservoir pressure, p, and temperature, T, per unit volume of stock-tank oil (at surface, T= 60~ and p 1 atm). Four joints of pipe (casing, tubing) connected together. Percentage or fraction of a separate component of the crude oil having a certain boiling point range, or of a product of refining or distilling. Tall columns used in refineries to separate oil into its various components, e.g., gasoline, kerosene, gas-oil, etc. Artificial opening up (fracturing) of a formation, by pumping fluids under high pressure, to increase permeability and flow of oil to the well. The pumping in of acid solution to dissolve rocks in addition to fracturing the formation. Fracturing by pumping in liquid under pressure,
927
Frasch Process
exceeding fracturing pressure. Process to remove sulfur from a sulfur-bearing crude oil, by using cupric acid, developed by Herman Frasch. G
Gage Ticket Gager
Written record of the volumetric quantity of fluids in the tanks kept by gauger or pumper. Person who measures the amount of fluid in lease storage tanks and/or the quantity of material entering the sales line.
Gas
free gas gas cap natural gas solution gas sour gas Gas Drilling Geophones Go-Devil Gun Barrel Tank
Gum
Gas present in a vapor state. Pocket of free gas trapped in the reservoir. Gas associated with oil in a reservoir. Gas dissolved (in solution) in reservoir liquids. Natural gas containing hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Use of compressed natural gas instead of liquid as the circulation medium in rotary drilling. Microphones placed near the earth's surface to detect seismic waves. A device sent through a pipeline for cleaning purposes (see Pig). A settling tank placed between the pumping unit and other tanks, normally fitted with a trap at the top to separate gas from the liquids. Naturally-occurring or synthetic hydrophilic colloids used to control various properties of drilling fluids. H
Head (fluid)
Holiday Horsehead
Hydrocracking Hydrophones Hydrostatic Head
h = P/7, where h = head of fluid (e.g., in ft), p = pressure (i.e., in lb/ft2), and 7 = specific weight of fluid (e.g., in lb/ft3). Gap left in the protective coating of painted tanks. End of a pumping beam to which the polished rod is attached, the sucker rods are screwed into the polished rod. Method of cracking or breaking up of long-chain hydrocarbons. Waterproof microphones used to detect seismic echoes at sea. Pressure (p) exerted at the bottom of a column of liquid, p = ~, x D, where 7 = the specific weight of liquid, e.g., in lb/cu ft; and D = depth, e.g., in ft.
928
Independent(s)
Companies engaged in a certain phase of the petroleum industry, without being a part of one of the larger oil companies. Inflow Performance Plot of the flowing bottomhole pressure versus the Relationship, flow rate (q), greatly influenced by the reservoir drive IPR mechanism. Injection Placing fluids into the reservoir under pressure. carbon dioxide injection Compressed CO 2 is injected into the formation to supply energy to push the oil toward the producing wells and also to improve recovery by mixing with both the oil and water. caustic injection Adding caustic to the water being injected to improve oil recovery by forming oil-water emulsions that help plug off the larger pore channels, giving a more even push to oil in moving it toward the producing wells. Also reduces interfacial tension and increases the relative permeability to oil. Irreducible Fluid Saturation Equilibrium saturation of the wetting phase, which cannot be lowered by flowing indefinitely a nonwetting phase through a porous medium, providing evaporation does not take place. In-Situ Combustion Enhanced recovery technique by starting a fire at the injector to generate heat and gas to drive oil toward the producing wells. Integrated Company An oil company engaged in several phases of petroleum industry, e.g., production, refining, marketing, and shipping. Internal Yield Minimum internal pressure to burst casing (pipe).
Jeep Joint
Device for detecting gaps in the protective coating of a pipeline. Single section of a pipe. K
Kelly
A hollow 40-fl long pipe, having four or more sides and threaded connections at each end to permit it to be attached to the swivel and to the drillpipe. It transmits torque from the rotary drilling table to the drillstring. L
LACT (Lease Automatic Custody Transfer)
Fully automated tank battery that records and ships oil and gas into a gathering pipeline.
929 Latent Heat of Vaporization Btu's required to vaporize 1 lb of a liquid at its atmospheric boiling point. Lease Legal document which gives one party rights to drill and produce oil on real estate owned by another party. Various methods of lifting oil to the surface. Lift Mechanism(s) Any mechanism, other than natural, that lifts fluid to artificial lift the surface. Device using a cable, often from a tower, instead of a cable lift walking beam to lift the sucker rods. Downhole electric motor and pump, which are used electric submersible lift for high volumes of fluid production. Injection of gas into the well to lift fluids out of the gas lift wellbore. Use of hydraulic pressure to activate the downhole hydraulic lift pump. Use of solid metal rods to activate the downhole rod lift (or pumping) pump. Any lifting equipment at the surface such as a pumpsurface lift ing unit. Volatile components (or fractions) of petroleum. Lighter Ends Instructions that include names of owners of the Line List property, length of pipeline and any special instructions or restrictions. Pipeline inspector who examines the pipeline along its Linewalker extension, looking for evidence of leaks, corrosion, etc. Continuous record of certain data obtained from a Log logging tool lowered into the wellbore. Measurements of porosity, cement bonding and acoustic log lithology by use of sonic waves. Determination of the inside diameter of a wellbore or caliper log casing. Measurement of the formation conductivity. conduction log Measurement of formation porosity. Involves bomdensity log barding the formation with gamma rays, with detectors measuring the number of gamma rays that are reflected from the formation. Continuous recording of types of cuttings, gas and oil drillers log occurrences while drilling the well. Measures the electric characteristics of a formation; electric log the tool transmits signals to the surface. Measurement of the natural formation radioactivity to gamma ray log determine lithology. Measurement of the formation resistivity response to induction log an induced current. Measurements of porosity, type of fluids and/or gas, nuclear log
930
neutron log
pressure log production log
resistivity log
lithology, etc., by recording the nuclear properties of the formation. Measurement of porosity; also valuable information concerning rock composition and fluid content. The logging tool bombards the formation with neutrons. Measurement of the formation pressure at various depths. Measurement of the production status of a completed well. Yields information on the nature and movement of fluids within the well. Defines the reservoirs contents. Electric current flows in the formation between two electrodes on a logging tool and measures resistivity between those two points.
sonic log (see Acoustic Log) spontaneous potential, SP Measurement of the difference in potential between the formation and the earth's surface ~ identification of rock types. temperature log Measurement of the formation temperature at various depths. Recording of data (various physical, chemical, and Logging mechanical properties of a reservoir) obtained by lowering of various types of measuring tools into a wellbore. M
Mandrel Mouse Hole
Mud Mud Logger Mud Program Multiple Completions Miscible Drive Miscible Mixture Mobility
Device used to bend the pipe without deforming it. Shallow hole drilled on one side of a drilling rig to store the next joint of pipe to be added to the drilling string. See Drilling Mud. Person who analyzes the cuttings brought up by the drilling mud while drilling the well. Plan of supplying and using drilling fluids and their additives during the drilling process. Several producing zones completed for production through one well. Fluid displacement in which the displacing fluid and the displaced fluid become miscible in all proportions. Complete mixture of fluids: single phase. The ability of a fluid to move through a reservoir. N
Naphtha
Petroleum distillate used as a cleaning fluid, for
931
Natural Gas
Natural gasoline
example. A naturally-occurring mixture of hydrocarbon and nonhydrocarbon gases found in porous media at depth. It is often associated with crude oil. Composed mainly (z 70 to 96%) of methane gas. A condensate of natural gas: "Casinghead gasoline". O
Occupational Health and Federal law covering working conditions and health Safety Act of 1971 (OSHA) and safety of workers in industry and business. Octane Number A measure of anti-knock quality of gasoline. The higher the rating the lower the knock. One hundred octane number indicates that gasoline will perform as a pure octane. Oil String The casing in a well that runs from the surface to the zone of production. Oil Treater (also Heater Equipment used to separate natural gas, BS&W and Treater) water from the oil by the use of heat. Olefins Class of unsaturated hydrocarbons (one double bond), such as ethene, (CznH4n). Organization of Petroleum Middle Eastern, South American and African counExporting Countries tries with large petroleum reserves that have joined (OPEC) together to control production and marketing (pricing) of oil. Override Additional royalty payment in excess of the usual royalty. Overburden pressure Total pressure, Pt, exerted on a reservoir by the weight of the overlying rocks and fluids. It is balanced by the pore pressure, pp, plus the grain-to-grain stress, pg (or effective pressure, p e ) " p t = rDp + rDe . Oxidation Process in which a given substance loses electrons or a share of its electrons. P
Packer
Paraffins Pay Sand Perforating knife perforating
Mechanical device set in the casing (attached to the tubing) to prevent communication between the tubing and annulus. Group of saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons (CnHzn+2). Paraffin also denotes a solid, waxy material. The zone of production where commercially recoverable oil and/or gas are present. Making holes in the casing (or liner) so that gas and fluids can enter the wellbore. Holes are made in the casing by a mechanical device (kuife).
932 Perforating the casing by shooting bullets. Perforating the casing by jets. A measurement of the ease of flow of fluids through porous media. Permeability is equal to one Darcy if 1 c m 3 o f fluid flows through 1 cm 2 of cross-section of rock per second under a pressure gradient of 1 atm/ cm, the fluid viscosity being 1 cP. A measure of the ability of the porous medium to effective permeability transmit a particular fluid at the existing saturation, (of a porous medium which is normally less than 100%. to a fluid) Ratio of the effective permeability at a given saturarelative permeability tion of that fluid to the absolute permeability at 100% saturation (k). The terms k ro (ko /k), k r g (k g /k) ~ and kr w (k/k) denote the relative permeabilities to oil, to gas, and to water, respectively, k is the absolute permeability, often the single-phase liquid permeability. Working surface or deck of a drilling rig. Platform Device sent though pipelines to clean it. Pig (see Go-Devil) Pipeline crew who prepare and line up the pipe, and Pipe Gang make the initial welds. Device for bending small-diameter pipes without Pipe Shoe deforming them. Person who measures the amount and quality of oil Pipeline Gager entering the gathering lines from lease tanks. Pipelines from the lease tank batteries to the lease Pipeline - Gathering shipping line. The main line. Pipeline- Trunk Working area for cleaning, coating and storing pipe. Pipeyard Catalytic reforming unit to convert the low-quality oil Platforming to higher octane products. "Plugging off" or stopping production from a lower Plug Back portion of a producing oil well. Compounds having many repeated linked units. Polymers Primary Drive Mechanism The predominant reservoir drive mechanism when more than one drive mechanism is present. The difference in pressure at two given points, divided Pressure gradient by the distance between these two points. Period (time) that the lease covers. Primary Term Total removal of fluids using only the initial reservoir Primary Recovery energy, q Productivity Index (PR or J) It is equal to PR = J = - - , where q = flow rate Pr -- Pwl
gun perforating jet perforating Permeability
Pumper
(bbl/D); pr = average reservoir pressure (psia); and Pwf = flowing bottomhole pressure at the wellbore (psia). Person in charge of production and records for a
933
Pumping Pumping Rig, Standard Pumps ball pump centrifugal pump plunger lift pump
sonic pump
Pumping Off Pumping Stations
producing well or group of wells. Lifting fluids from the production well to the surface by an artificial lift method. Conventional pumping unit using a walking beam to raise and lower the sucker rods. Mechanical devices which lift fluids to the surface. Pump using a ball and seat to lift fluids. Pump using rotating impellers to lift fluids. A plunger that is driven up the tubing by the produced gas, and then falling by gravity to the bottom of the tubing to lift another load of fluid. Downhole pump that generates sound waves resonating on the tubing which lifts by opening and closing a series of check valves. Pumping the reservoir fluids out of the well faster than they can enter the wellbore. Pumps placed along a pipeline at intervals to maintain the pipeline pressure and flow. R
Radial Flow Rat Hole Rate of Penetration Recovery primary recovery secondary recovery tertiary recovery
Reduced Temperature
Two-dimensional flow from all points around a 360 ~ circle within a formation to a centered well. Shallow hole drilled next to a drilling rig where the Kelly is stored when not in use. Speed with which the drilling bit cuts through the formation. The petroleum produced from the reservoir in % (or fraction) of the total oil-in-place. The production obtained using the initial reservoir energy. The production obtained by introducing a second source of energy, i.e., waterflooding. The production obtained by introducing a third source of energy, i.e., enhanced oil recovery, such as thermal, CO 2 flooding, surfactants, polymers, alkaline flooding, in-situ combustion, and DC electrical current. The absolute temperature divided by the absolute critical temperature T = T/T. The absolute pressure at which the gas exists divided by the absolute critical pressure, P/Pc" Rearranging the carbon and hydrogen molecules by use of catalysts and heat. r
Reduced Pressure Reforming Relative Permeability (see permeability) Reservoir
r
A porous and permeable rock formation or trap
934
Residuals Residuum Rod Rotary Drilling Roughneck Royalty Run Run Ticket
holding an accumulation of gas and/or oil. "Left over" materials in boilers or refinery vessels. Sticky, black mass left in bottom of a refining vessel. Sucker rod is attached to the downhole pump, usually having a length of 16 89ft. A drilling method that imparts a turning or rotary motion to the drill string to drill the hole. Member of a drilling crew who assists the driller. Fee paid to the owner of a lease based on the volume of production. Delivering (or transferring) oil from the lease tank battery to the pipeline or tank truck. Amount and quality of the run: a written record. S
SIDPP SI Samples bottom sample composite sample running sample
spot sample water and sediment sample Saturation Scratchers
Screen Liner
Scale Inhibitor
Sediment
Shut-in drillpipe pressure. Shut-in, term often used for wells that are no longer producing. Small volumes of oil drawn from a tank for testing. Sample obtained from the lowest point in the tank. Sample composed of equal portions of samples obtained from two or more points in the tank. Sample taken by lowering an unstoppered beaker from the top outlet level to the bottom outlet and returning it at a uniform rate of speed so that it is about three quarters full when returned. Sample obtained from a particular level of the tank. Sample of oil taken for obtaining the water and sediment content, usually by centrifuging. Percentage of a particular fluid in a porous medium, expressed as the percent of the pore volume. Mechanical devices placed on the outside of the casing to clean the drilling mud cake from the sides of the wellbore prior to cementing in order to improve the cement bond between the casing and the formation. Perforated pipe or wire mesh screen placed at the bottom of the well to prevent larger formation particles from entering the wellbore. Chemicals introduced into the producing well to prevent the buildup of scale, paraffin, etc. These can block off the flow of fluids and gas into the wellbore. Particulate material (clay, silt, etc.) that is carried along with the produced fluids and settles to the bottom of the tanks.
935 Secondary Recovery (see recovery) Separator
Equipment for separating the crude oil from the natural gas and water. The primary function of the Separator is to produce gas-free liquid and liquid-flee gas. Drilling a new section of wellbore parallel to a previSidetracking ously drilled hole but blocked with junk. Marine drilling rig that can either be anchored to the Semi-Submersible bottom of sea or maintained at a given position. Centrifuging to separate water, oil, and BS&W that Shaking Out may be present in a sample. Mechanical device for separation of rock cuttings Shale Shaker from the drilling fluid as it arrives at the surface. Sidetracked Well Well drilled out from the side of a previously drilled well. Sidewall Cock Valve placed on the side of a tank for the purpose of obtaining small oil samples. Solution Gas Gas dissolved so thoroughly in the oil that the solution formed is one phase. Sour Gas (or Oil) Gas or oil which contains hydrogen sulfide. Specific Heat Quantity of heat (e.g., in Btu' s) required to raise the temperature of a unit weight of material (e.g., 1 lb) one degree (temperature, e.g., I~ Specific Surface Surface of pores and pore channels per unit of pore volume (commonly), per unit of bulk volume, or per unit of grain volume. The above information m u s t be supplied by the investigator. Surfactants (in stimulation) Chemicals that prevent stimulation fluids from forming emulsions with reservoir oil. Swabbing Raising and lowering rubber cups in the tubing to recover liquids- "bicycle pump" action. Sweet Gas (or Oil) Gas or oil devoid of hydrogen sulfide. T Torque Tortuosity (~)
Turning or twisting force on a drilling string. Square of the ratio of the effective length, Le, to the length parallel to the overall direction of flow of the L pore channels, z = (_~__)2.
Tour
Shift of duty at well site (normally 8 hours and pronounced as "tower"). Arrangement of pulleys on the drilling rig with an attached hook, which moves up and down on cables running through the crown block.
Traveling Block
936 Trip Turbodrills
Process of pulling drillstring (or tubing) out of the borehole and then running it back in. A rotary drilling method in which fluid pumped down the tubing turns the drill bit. The downhole motor consists of multistage vane-type rotor and stator section, bearing section, drive shaft, and bit-rotating sub. V
Viscosity
Measure of the internal resistance of a fluid to flow. Viscosity is equal to the ratio of shearing stress, x, to the rate of shearing strain. Considering a flow between two parallel plates, ~t = (F/A): (V/h), where: F = force required to move the upper plate, having an area, A. V= velocity of upper plate; velocity of a thin layer of fluid adhering to the lower plate is zero. h = distance between plates. W
Water Shut-Off Test (WSO) A test that ensures there is no communication above and below a selected interval in a well. Weight Indicator Device that constantly measures the weight of the drillstring on a drilling rig. Wireline A rope made from steel wire. Workover Remedial work on a well, i.e., cleaning, repairing, servicing, stimulating, etc., after commencement of production. Z Zones of Lost Circulation
Openings in the formation (fractures, etc.) into which the drilling mud is lost without returning to the surface during the drilling operations.
937 RECOMMENDED REFERENCES Berger, B. D. and Anderson, K. E., 1978. Modern Petroleum, A Basic Industry Primer. Petroleum Publishing Co., Tulsa, OK, 293 pp. Chilingarian, G. V., Robertson, J. O. Jr. and Kumar, S., 1987. Surface Operations in Petroleum Production, L Developments in Petroleum Science, 19A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 821 pp. Chilingarian, G. V., Robertson, J. O. Jr. and Kumar, S., 1989. Surface Operations in Petroleum Production, II. Developments in Petroleum Science, 19B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 562 pp. Chilingarian, G. V. and Vorabutr, P., 1981. Drilling and Drilling Fluids. Developments in Petroleum Science, 11. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 767 pp. Langnes, G. L., Robertson, J.O. Jr., and Chilingar, G. V., 1972. Secondary Recovery and Carbonate Reservoirs. Am. Elsevier, New York, 304 pp. Skinner, D. R., 1983. Introduction to Petroleum Production. Drilling, Well Completions, Reservoir Engineering. Vol. 1., Gulf Pub. Co., Houston, TX, 190 pp.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
939
Appendix C FUNDAMENTALS OF SURFACE AND CAPILLARY FORCES G.V. CHILINGARIAN, J.O. ROBERTSON JR., G.L. LANGNES and S.J. MAZZULLO
INTRODUCTION
Wettability may be defined as the ability of the liquid to "wet", or spread over, a solid surface. Figure C-1A shows a liquid wetting a solid surface, whereas Fig. C-1B shows the relationship between the liquid and solid when the liquid has little affinity for the solid. In Fig. C-1C, the liquid drop occupies an intermediate position. The fluid which wets the surface more strongly occupies the smaller pores and minute interstices in a rock.
e < 90-
o > 90-
SOLID
$
A
8
o
99 0 ,
C
Fig. C-1. Different degrees of wetting of solid by liquid.
INTERFACIAL TENSION AND CONTACT ANGLE
The angle which the liquid interface makes with the solid is called the contact angle, 0. Usually, it is measured from the solid through the liquid phase (if the other phase is a gas) and through the water phase if oil and water are both present. In a capillary tube, shown in Fig. C-2A, the angle between the side of the tube and the tangent to the curved interface (where it intersects the side of the tube) is less than 90 ~ For a capillary depression, shown in Fig. C-2B, the contact angle is greater than 90 ~ In the case of no rise or depression, the angle is 90 ~ (Fig. C-2C). Interfacial tension, 0, is caused by the molecular property (intermolecular cohesive forces) of liquids. It has the dimensions of force per unit length (lb/ft or dynes/ cm), or energy per unit area (ergs/cm2). On considering an element of a surface having double curvature (R~ and R2), the sum of the force components normal to the element is equal to zero (Fig. C-3). The pressure difference, pz-p~, is balanced by the
940
I A
B
C
Fig. C-2. Behavior of various fluids in glass capillary tubes. A = water, B = mercury, and C = tetrahydronaphthalene (when glass is perfectly clean and liquid is pure).
2~ 2 '
" "! I_
_1 dx
/'"'-,~ I'" N Crdx
Fig. C-3. Surface tension forces acting on a small element on the surface having double curvature, (P2 = Pl + yh). (See Binder, 1962, and Vennard, 1961.)
interfacial tension forces: (P2-P~) dydx = 2 a dy sin02 + 2 a dx sin0~
(C-l)
If the contact angles 0~ and 02 are small, then the following simplifications m a y be made:
@ sin01 = ~ 2R~ and:
(C-2)
94 1
Fig. C-4. Rise of water in glass capillary tube. (See Binder, 1962, and Vennard, 1961.)
Therefore, Eq. C- 1 becomes: 1
1
P 2 - P I = o(-+-) R2 R ,
For a capillary tube (Fig. C-4):
R, =R,=R d cose = 2R
and
P, = P,+ Yh
(A3-7)
942
.O' o
SOLID Fig. C-5. Shape of water drop resulting from interfacial tension forces. where ? = specific weight of fluid, d = diameter of capillary tube, and h = height of capillary rise. Thus, Eqs. C-4 through C-7 may be combined to yield the following expression for capillary rise, h" h=
4or cos0 ~,d
(C-8)
Equation C-8 can also be derived on considering the equilibrium of vertical forces. The weight of fluid in the capillary tube, W, which is acting downward, is equal to: W = zr d2hy 4
(C-9)
The vertical component of interfacial tension force acting upwards is equal to: F t r y = rcdcr cos0
(C- 10)
Equating these two forces and solving for h gives rise to Eq. C-8. In reference to Fig. C-5, the interfacial tensions can be expressed as O-ws+ Crwocos0+~o
(C-11)
where Crw~,Crwo,and %o = interfacial tensions at the phase boundaries water-solid, water-oil and solid-oil, respectively, or O-so cr cos0 = - O'wo
ws
(C- 12)
As shown in Fig. C-6A, when a solid is completely immersed in a water phase, 0 = 0 ~ cos0 = 0, and consequently, "wo
=or s o - o r w s
(C-13)
943 e : O*
O : 90 ~
e:180* 0
OIL
e W
W
8
C
9 WATER
A
Fig. C-6. Illustrations of 0~ 90~ and 180~contact angles. When half of the solid is wet by water and the other half by oil (Fig. C-6B), 0 = 90 ~ cos0 = 0 and thus ~o = Crws.
(C-14)
On the other hand, if the solid is completely wetted by oil (Fig. C-6C), 0 = 180 ~ cosO 1, and
-
crSO = crWS - crWO
(C-15)
If 0 < 90 ~ the surfaces are called hydrophilic and when 0 > 90 ~ they are called hydrophobic. An interfacial tension depressant lowers Crwo,whereas a wetting agent lowers 0 or increases cos0. A decrease in crw o does not necessarily mean an increase in cos0, or vice versa, because of the changes in crSO and crWS . I f a rock is completely water wet ( 0 = 0~ water will try to envelop all of the grains and force all of the oil out in to the middle of the pore channel. Even though some oil may still be trapped in this case, the recovery would be high. On the other hand, if all of the solid surfaces were completely oil wet (0 = 180~ oil would try to envelop all of the grains and force all of the water out into the center of the pore channel. In this extreme case, recovery would be very low by water drive. Many oil-wet reservoirs are known to exist. In the usual case (0 ~ < 0 < 180~ to improve waterflooding operations the contact angle 0 should be changed from > 90 ~ to < 90 ~ through the use of surfactants. This would move the oil from the surface of the grains out into the center of the pore channels, where they would be produced more readily. Contaminants or impurities may exist in either fluid phase and/or may be adsorbed on the solid surface. Even if present in minute quantities, they can and do change the contact angle from the value measured for pure systems (see Marsden, 1968).
944 EFFECT OF CONTACTANGLE AND INTERFACIAL TENSION ON MOVEMENT OF OIL For an ideal system composed of pure liquids, the advancing contact angle should equal the receding angle. Because of the presence of impurities within the liquids, however, the advancing contact angle is greater in most systems. The advancing contact angle is the angle formed at the phase boundary when oil is displaced by water. It can be measured as follows: the crystal plate is covered by oil and then the water drop is advanced on it. The contact angle is the limiting angle with time after equilibrium has been established (Fig. C-7). The contact angle formed when water is displaced by oil is called the receding angle (Fig. C-8). The contact angles during movement of a water-oil interface in a cylindrical capillary, having a hydrophilic surface, are shown in Fig. C-9. Inasmuch as a reservoir is basically a complex system of interconnected capillaries of various sizes and shapes, an understanding of flow through capillaries is very important. In Fig. C-10, a simple two-branch capillary system is presented. If a pressure drop is applied, then the water will flow more readily through the large-diameter capillary than it will through the small-diameter one. Thus a certain volume of oil may be trapped in the small capillary when water reaches the upstream fork. Poiseuille's law states that:
WA1 ER SOLID OIL Fig. C-7. Contact angle: plate is first immersed in oil followed by the placement of water drop on top.
W&TER
Fig.C-8. Contact angle: plate is first immersed in water followed by placing a drop of oil underneath.
945
OIL
I~i IN,
-
/O
/
W~TER
9o
Fig. C-9. Changes in contact angle as a result of movement of water-oil interferface. 0 = contact angle at static position; O = contact angle when oil is displaced by water (advancing angle); and 0b = contact angle when water is displaced by oil (receding angle).
TRAPPED
OiL Gt ORtJl F
- - .
W~,T ER
/-... Fig. C- 10. Flow through a two-branch capillary and trapping of oil in a small-diameter capillary.
~d4 ~Pt q =
128 ,uL
(C-16)
and q d 2 Ap, v= ~ = ~ A 32/.tL
(C-17)
w h e r e q = v o l u m e t r i c rate o f flow, cm3/sec; d = d i a m e t e r o f capillary, cm; A P t -- total p r e s s u r e drop, dynes/cm2; A = cross-sectional area, cm2; ~t = viscosity, cP; L = flow path length, cm; v = velocity, cm/sec. The capillary pressure, Pc, is equal to:
946 p = 4rrcos0 c d
(C-18)
where rr = interfacial tension between oil and water, dynes/cm; d = diameter of capillary, cm; and 0 = contact angle, degrees. The total pressure drop, APt, is equal to: (C- 19)
APt -- APi + P
where APi-" applied pressure, dynes/cm 2. Solving for v in each capillary, by combining Eqs. C- 17, C- 18 and C- 19 gives: all2
vl
=
32/.tiLl
(APi+ 4or cos0)
(C-20)
dI
and
d22 (APi+
v2 = 32~t2L2
4rr cos0 dE )
(C-21)
Setting L~ = L 2 and/.t~ =/~2, and dividing Eq. C-20 by Eqs. C-21 gives the following relationship: V1
v~
=
d12 APi + 4 o r c o s 0 d
1
d d Api + 4or cos0a~
Therefore, when
(C-22)
Ap, >> P :
V1 dl 2 ~z~ V1 d22
(C-23)
and when @ i << Pc" v~ d~ ~z~ v~ d 2
(C-24)
As shown in Fig. C-11, the sum of forces acting on the trapped oil globule may be expressed as"
~] F = F, + G - G
(c-25)
where: F = rd2 zip, 4
(C-26)
947
9
, ,
.
WATER ~
.
~Fz --~ ,
.
.
OIL
,,
,,
F3 ,,
WATER
,,,
db
f
o"o Fig. C-11. Forces acting on a trapped oil globule in a capillary.
zrd2
F, = ---4- Ap~
(C-27) a)
(C-28)
F 3 = 1rd2(4or bCOS0b)
(C-29)
F 2 = ffd 2 (40"aCOS0
Thus: Apt = Ap/-~-
(4o-acos0 a) d
-
(4or bCOS0b) d
(C-30)
Because the receding angle is usually less than the advancing angle, the capillary pressure not only does not help, but hinders the flow. The term (4or bCOS0 b/d) is usually greater than (4or acos0/d) because 0b < 0a. If a surfactant were added at the left to reduce era, APt would become less and the oil globule may eventually move to the left in Fig. C- 11 when APtbecomes negative. The quantity of trapped oil is dependent upon the value of cr cos 0 at each end of the globule as well as upon z~pi (imposed pressure drop). Inasmuch as the contact angle depends upon the interfacial tensions, which, in turn, may be influenced by surfactants, these chemicals may alter recovery by altering both the contact angle and interfacial tension. As the oil is displaced by water, which wets the rock surfaces, capillary pressure is a driving force. If, on the other hand, water does not wet the rock surface, then the capillary pressure is a retarding force which must be overcome. The magnitude of capillary pressure in pores having a radius of around 15 microns is not large and, therefore, capillary pressure is not an important force during the movement of oil-water contact, providing there is no mixing. The movement of oil and water in a reservoir, however, results in the formation of water-oil and gas-wateroil mixtures (see Muravyov et al., 1958). The amount of gas coming out of solution
948
SOLID
P2
/
\a2
\
P,
SOLID
Fig. C-12. Movementof gas globule through a constriction. (After Muravyovet al., 1958.) during migration is greater with increasing amount of dissolved active substances, with increasing surface area of porous medium (i.e., with decreasing permeability), and with decreasing temperature. As the oil-water-gas mixtures move through pores, the gas bubbles and water droplets are deformed on passing through constrictions (Fig. C-12) (see Muravyov et al., 1958). In order to move, the gas globule as shown in Fig. C-12 must overcome the capillary pressure equal to: _ 20"
Ap = Pl--P2
Rl
20" _ 2 o " ( 1 - 1 )
R---~
R1
(C-31)
R2
Although the Ap may be very small for a single globule, the cumulative resistance of many bubbles may be large (Jamin effect). Additional resistance to flow is created by the polymolecular layers of oriented molecules of surface-active components in the oil, which are adsorbed on the rock surface and may be quite thick (10 -3 to 10-4 cm). At a constant pressure differential, the rate of oil filtration through porous media diminishes with time and is more pronounced in the case of higher content of polar compounds in the oil. In water-wet carbonate rocks, vugs are "bad news" because during the waterflooding operations oil is trapped in the vugs. On the other hand, in oil-wet rocks, vugs are "good news" because water (non-wetting phase) will displace oil from the vugs. It should be remembered that the non-wetting phase preferably flows through larger pores.
949 WATER BLOCK
The minimum pressure, Pcwb,required for oil to displace a globule of water stuck in a pore throat between the rock grains, providing the oil is the wetting phase, is equal to:
Pwb = Cr@ + 1---)c~
(c-32)
where cr = interfacial tension between oil and water; r~ and r 2 = radii of capillary in two perpendicular directions; and 0 = contact angle. The above equation can be derived from Eq C-4" (C-33) R 1 R2 where Ap is the pressure difference across the oil-water interface, and R 1 and R 2 are the curvatures of interface in two perpendicular directions, by substituting rl/cosO for R~ and r2/cosOfor R 2. If cr = 25 dynes/cm, 0 = 30 ~ r 1 = 0.0001 cm and r 2 = 0.00001 cm, then Pwb = 34.5 psi. By reducing interfacial tension between oil and water to 0.5 dynes/cm, using a surface-active agent (surfactant), for example, Pwb will be lowered to 0.69 psi, and the water block can be easily broken.
REFERENCES Binder, R. C., 1962. Fluid Mechanics, 4th ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,453 pp. Marsden, S. S., 1968. "Wettability": The elusive key to waterflooding. Pet. Engr., (Apr.):82-87. Muravyov, I., Andriasov, R., Gimatudinov, Sh., Govorova, G. and Polozkov, V., 1958. Development and Exploration of Oil and Gas Fields. Peace (Mir) Publishers, Moscow, 503 pp. (in English.) Vennard, J. K., 1961. Elementary Fluid Mechanics, 4th Ed. Wiley, New York, N.Y., 570 pp.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
951
Appendix D SAMPLE QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS G.V. CHILINGARIAN, J.O. ROBERTSON JR. AND S.J. MAZZULLO
GENERAL GEOLOGY
1. Before using compressibility data, what questions should be answered? 2. How would you predict abnormally high formation pressures in carbonate reservoirs? 3. (a) In an anticline, draw the oil-water contact if shaliness in a carbonate reservoir increases towards the flank, whereas porosity decreases. (b) If the oil-water contact in this particular reservoir tilts in the opposite direction, what would be the possible reasons? Explain why. 4. Show diagrammatically, the classification of carbonate rocks based on intercommunicating porosity and speed of sound. 5. Based on differential entrapment theory, if a reef contains water (1/3), oil (1/3), and gas (1/3), what could the reef updip contain? 6. How would you predict abnormally high formation pressures using chemistry of interstitial solutions? 7. Explain differential entrapment of oil and gas theory. Draw a schematic diagram. 8. According to Chilingar's classification, what would you call a carbonate rock having Ca/Mg ratio of 40? 10. What does decrease in Ca/Mg ratio of carbonate rocks during diagenesis and catagenesis indicate? List all possibilities. 11. Name the following carbonate rocks: (a) containing 60% skeletal fragments and 40% micrite; (b) containing 91% coated grains (oopellets) and 9% micrite; and (c) GMR = 7.2/2.5, with detrital grains. 12. Define epigenetic dolomites and explain the Ca/Mg ratio distribution in such rocks. Reference: Larsen, G. and Chilingar, G.V. (Editors), 1967. Diagenesis in Sediments, Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam.
SOURCE ROCKS
1. Do you believe that carbonate rocks could act as source rocks? Why? 2. Compare carbonates and shales as source rocks of petroleum, and list all differences. Reference: Chilingar, G.V., Bissel, H. J. and Fairbridge, R.W. (Editors), 1967. Carbonate Rocks (Physical and Chemical Aspects), 9B Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 225 - 251.
3. What relationship exists between insoluble residue and organic matter in carbonate rocks?
952 Reference: Chilingar, G.V., Bissel, H.J. and Fairbridge, R.W. (Editors), 1967. Carbonate Rocks (Origin, Occurrence and Classification), 9A Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 8 7 - 168.
4. Discuss in detail all geochemical techniques for recognizing carbonate source rocks. Reference: Chilingar, G., Bissel, H.J. and Fairbridge, R.W. (Editors), 1967. Carbonate Rocks (Origin, Occurrence and Classification), 9A Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 8 7 - 168.
CAPILLARY PRESSURE
1. What effect does dolomitization have on capillary pressure correlations? 2. For two different cores having the same Pc 5~(pressure necessary to fill 50% of the pores with the nonwetting phase) draw a schematic diagram of pressure versus precentage wetting phase saturation curves if one core has better sorting than the other. Explain! 3. What relationship exists between Pd (pressure at which nonwetting phase is present in the pore system as a continuous phase), ps0, permeability, and mean pore throat size. Discuss! 4. What does a capillary pressure hysteresis loop show? Reference: Pickell, J.J., Swanson, B.E and Hickman, W.B., 1966. Application of air-mercury and oil-air capillary pressure data in the study of pore structure and fluid distribution,./. Pet. Tech, 237(3):55 -61.
5. What effect does dolomitization have on capillary pressure correlations? Reference: Rockwood, S.H., Lair, G.H. and Langford, B.J., 1957. Reservoir volumetric parameters defined by capillary pressure studies, J. Pet. Tech, 210(9): 2 5 2 - 259.
6. Outline regularities in the relationship between the shape of capillary pressure curves and pore configuration (size and shape of pores, type and width of intercommunicating channels, etc.). 7. Draw mercury capillary pressure curves (schematic diagrams) which are representative of a poor and a good carbonate reservoir rock. Label and explain all parts of the curves. 8. Draw approximate schematic diagrams of capillary pressure versus wetting phase saturation curves for: (a) Dolomite: intercrystalline porosity = 20%, mean pore throat size = 0.0021 mm, size of pores (avg.) = 0.3 mm, sorting = 2.6 ~ units, and permeability = 98 mD. (b) Oolitic limestone: Intergranular porosity = 19%, mean pore throat size = 0.0035 mm, size of pores (avg.) = 0.19 mm, sorting = 6.6 ~ units, and permeability = 40 mD. (c) Oolitic limestone: Intergranular to vuggy porosity = 14%, mean pore throat size = 0.0004 mm, size of pores (avg.) = 0.3 mm, sorting = 3.5 ~ units, and permeability = 9 mD.
PERMEABILITY AND POROSITY
1. Draw the relative permeability curves for polar and nonpolar oil. Discuss the magnitude of oil and water recovery in the case of polar and nonpolar oil. 2. Derive Kozeny's Equation.
953 3. What are stylolites? Do they improve permeability or not? Why? 4. List all processes by which secondary porosity may form. Also show their favorable and unfavorable effects upon oil recovery. 5. Show imbibition relative permeabilities for a spectrum of wetting conditions (for different contact angles, 0). 6. Show relationship between the relative permeability and capillary pressure curves. Show location of water, oil+water, water-free oil, etc. zones. 7. Estimate the porosity of chalk at a depth of 1000 m (assume normal compaction). 8. During drilling operations in dolomitized Asmari Limestone, Iran, only granular material was recovered. How would you estimate the porosity? 9. Define "effective" permeability. How closely does it approach absolute permeability? Why? 10. Compare simulator-calculated permeabilities with and without considering capillary pressure. 11. A carbonate reservoir has a porosity of 16% (diagenetic dolomitization is evident). Vugs and fractures are present. What is the percentage porosity due to: (a) dolomitization, (b) fractures, (c) vugs? Why? Estimate the primary porosity. 12. What is the reason for high porosity (>30%) of chalk reservoirs at a depth where porosity due to normal compaction should be around 10%? 13. Define "effective porosity" as used in Russia. What are the advantages? 14. Determine the permeability of a given thin section using both Teodorovich's and Lucia's methods. Expalin the difference. Thin section should be provided by the Professor. 15. Discuss dissolution porosity and compare it with dolomitization porosity. What is the effect of dissolution and dolomitization on insoluble residue content and Ca/Mg ratio? Reference: Chilingar, G.V., 1956. Use of Ca/Mg ratio in porosity studies, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 40: 2256- 2266.
16. If total secondary porosity (vugs + fractures) is equal to 3%, estimate the porosity due to fractures. Show all calculations. 17. Why are porosity and permeability insensititive to percent mud-size matrix when a rock is 50-75% dolomite? Reference: Ham, W.E. (Editor), 1962. Classification of carbonate rocks (A Symposium),Am. Assoc. Pet Geol., Tulsa, OK.
18. Diagramatically show the relationship between porosity, permeability and percent dolomitzation. 19. Estimate the permeability of arenaceous dolomite, containing finely porous conveying channels, by using Teodorovich's method. The fine elongate pores are abundant, and the rock has an effective porosity of 10%. 20. Calculate permeability, using Teodorovich's method, if porosity = 13% and size of elongated pores = 0.25-1 mm (Type II good porosity, with pores of different sizes). 21. Would replacement of calcite by dolomite theoretically result in an increase or decrease in porosity? Show all calculations. The specific gravity of dolomite = 2.87 and of calcite = 2.71. 22. Is there an increase or decrease in porosity as aragonite is replaced by (a) calcite and (b) dolomite? Show all calculations. The specific gravity of aragonite = 2.95,
954 of calcite = 2.71, and of dolomite = 2.87. 23. Would relative permeabilities to oil and to water be higher or lower if sandstone contains considerable amount of carbonate particles? Explain for both krw and k ! Reference: Sinnokrot, A.A. and Chilingar, G.V., 1961. Effect of polarity and presence of carbonate particles on relative permeability of rocks, Compass of Sigma Gamma Epsilon, 38:115- 120.
24. Do oil-wet reservoirs tend to have higher or lower recovery than water-wet reservoirs? Explain! 25. Explain the criteria used to suggest the occurrence of cavernous porosity while a well is drilling. 26. Explain the concept of"depositional-facies specificity" of porosity. 27. What relationship exists between porosity, insoluble residue, and Ca/Mg ratio in carbonate rocks? Explain! Reference: Chilingar, G.V., 1956. Use of Ca/Mg ratio in porosity studies. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 40:2256 - 2266.
PRODUCTION
1. In relating pressure to H (fraction of coarse porosity occupied by gas) would the curves for high c o n s t a n t Rp/Rsi , ratio lie higher or lower than those for l o w e r Rp/Rsi 9. Why? 2. Diagramatically show the difference between Darcy and non-Darcy flow, relating velocity and pressure gradient. 3. What are the most and least efficient drive mechanisms in carbonate reservoirs? 4. Give Forchheimer's equation describing non-Darcy flow. How does one determine the turbulence factor? 5. Draw performance curves for closed and open combination-drive pools and discuss the differences. 6. Discuss the theoretical proposals of Jones-Parra and Reytor regarding the effect of withdrawal rates on recovery from reservoirs having the fracture-matrix type of porosity. Reference: Jones-Parra, Juan and Reytor, R.S., 1959. Effect of gas-oil rates on the behavior of fractured limestone reservoirs, Trans, AIME, 216(5):395- 397.
7. Estimate the initial oil- and gas-in-place for the "XYZ" pool given the following data. Can you explain the apparently anomalous GOR behavior? Reservoir D a t a - XYZ Pool Average porosity Average effective oil permeability Interstitial water saturation Initial reservoir pressure Reservoir temperature Formation volume factor of formation water Productive oil zone volume (net) Productive gas zone volume (net)
16.8% 200 mD 27% 3,480 psia 207~ 1.025 bbl/STB 346,000 acre-ft 73,700 acre-ft
955 Pressure-Production Data Average reservoir pressure (psia)
Cumulative oil production (STB)
Cumulative GOR (SCF/B)
Cumulative water production (STB)
3,190 3,139 3,093 3,060
11,170,000 13,800,000 16,410,000 18,590,000
885 884 884 896
224,500 534,200 1,100,000 1,554,000
Flash Liberation Data (pertains to production through one separator at 100 psig and 75~ Pressure (psia)
B (I~bl/STB)
Rs (SCF/STB)
Z
3,480 3,200 3,200 2,400
1.476 1.448 1.407 1.367
857 792 700 607
0.925 0.905 0.888 0.880
ENHANCED RECOVERY
1. In the case of waterflooding, what range of contact angles is favorable? Why? 2. List problems involved in predicting secondary recovery of oil from reservoirs with a well-developed fracture-matrix porosity system. 3. List the three porosity type systems that are commonly present in carbonate reservoir rocks. How do these systems differ from one another? What type of secondary recovery technique would you use in each case? Why? 4. Discuss the factors that affect the sweep efficiency of a miscible flood. Why would one anticipate sweep efficiencies to be lower for a miscible displacement in a massive limestone than for waterflooding? 5. Is the recovery of oil from vugular carbonates higher or lower if the rock is oil-wet or water-wet? Why? 6. Discuss the major operational problems associated with the waterflooding of carbonate reservoirs. 7. Discuss the problems associated with gas injection in carbonate reservoirs.
LOGGING
1. By using density logs, calculate S on assuming (a) limestone and (b) dolomite, when R w= 0.02, Rf= 20, and m = 2.2. Explain the difference in the values obtained forS. 2. What is the porosity of a clastic limestone that shows a sonic transit time on the log of 90 ~tsec/ft? w
956 3. When using Archie's formula (F = ~-") for determining porosity from log analysis, what values of cementation factor, m, are appropriate for carbonate rocks? Reference: Pirson, S.J., 1963.Handbook of Well Log Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 23 - 24.
ACIDIZING
1. Given the following information, calculate the weight of dissolved pure limestone (or dolomite) and the radial distance acid will penetrate until it is spent: (a) Matrix acidizing of 40-ft-thick limestone producing section; (b) porosity = 0.16; (c) volume of acid = 600 gal of 15% hydrochloric acid; (d) spending time = 30 sec; (e) specific gravity of acid = 1.075; (f) pumping rate = 9 bbl/min.; and (g) wellbore radius = 4 in. Given also: chemical equation for the reaction between HC1 and calcite: CaCO 3 + 2HC1 ~ GaG12 + H 2 0 100 73 111 18
+ CO 2
44
(relative weights)
One thousand gallons of 15% by weight HC1 solution contains 1344.8 lb. of hydrochloric acid (1000 x 8.34 x 1.075 x 0.15). Chemical equation for the reaction between HC1 and dolomite: CaMg(CO3) 2 + 4HC1 ~ CaC12 + MgC12 + 2H20 + 2 C O 2 184.3 146 111 95.3 36 88 Reference: Craft, B. C., Holden, W.R. and Graves, E.D., Jr., 1962. WellDesign (Drilling and Production). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., pp. 5 3 6 - 546.
2. What effect does enlargement of pores have on acid velocity and the surface/ volume ratio? Are these effects opposite in significance or not? Explain! 3. How are acid volumes and pumping rates determined for acidizing operations? 4. How much deeper would later increments of acid penetrate before being spent? Why? 5. On using stronger acid, does spending time decrease or increase? Why? 6. Is sludge formation more or less likely with stronger acid? Why? How can it be prevented? 7. In acidizing operations, what are the functions of (a) intensifier, (b) surfactant, and (c) iron retention additive? 8. How are pumping pressure and necessary horsepower determined in acidizing operations? 9. Is the spending time of acid lower or higher in the case of lower specific surface area? Why? 10. Calculate the specific surface area of a carbonate rock with porosity = 15%. permeability = 8 mD, and cementation factor, m = 1 (matrix acidizing). Use at least two different formulas. References: (1) Chilingar, G.V., Main, R. and Sinnokrot, A., 1962. Relationship between porosity,
957 permeability and surface areas of sediments, J. Sediment. Petrol., 33(3):7759 - 7765. (2) Craft, B.C., Holden, W.R. and Graves, E.D., Jr., 1962. Well Design (Drilling and Production), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 5 3 6 - 546.
FRACTURING
1. Prove (using calculations) that fractures alone do not contribute much to reservoir rock porosity. 2. Calculate porosity (~), permeability (k) and fracture height (b), given the following data: J = 5 m3/d/atm; re= 600 m; B - 1.2; m = 9 cP, h - 15 m; and r w = 0.2 m. 3. The initial net overburden pressure is 2000 psi, whereas the final overburden pressure is 8000 psi. What is the final fracture capacity? 4. If the permeability of matrix is equal to 12 mD, whereas permeability of the whole large core is 35 mD, determine the width of the fracture present. Total width of the core - 5 cm. 5. Determine the pressure drop in a horizontal (and also vertical) fracture given the following data: (a) specific gravity of fluid flowing - 0.8; (b) NRe -- 5 , 0 0 0 ; (C) q = 10 ml/min.; (d) a - 9 mm; (e) b = 0.268 mm; (f) l - 15 cm; and (g) absolute roughness (e) -- 0.054. 6. Give a formula for determining porosity due to fractures using two saturating solutions having different resistivities. 7. Calculate the productivity ratio for a horizontal fracture if fracture width - 0.1 in., net pay zone thickness = 60 ft, permeability of propping agent in place = 32,000 mD, horizontal permeability = 0.6 mD, re/r w = 2 , 0 0 0 , and fracture penetration, rf/r e = 0.3. Reference" Craft, B.C., Holden, W.R. and Graves, E.D., Jr., 1962. Well Design (Drilling and Production), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 483 - 546.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
959
A U T H O R INDEX
Aalund, L., 332, 333,534 Abbit, W.E., 676 Abernathy, B.F., 29, 30, 31, 35, 36, 37, 51,258, 283, 534, 539 Abou-Sayed, A.S., 354, 534 Abrassart, C.P., 533 Acuna, J.A., 433,534 Adams, A.R., 41, 51, 676 Adams, R.L., 340, 344, 540 Adams, W.L., 793 Adler, EM., 393,394, 397, 534, 542 Adolph, R.A.,227 Agarwal, R.G., 612, 613,614, 650, 657, 676 Agtergerg, F.E, 100 Aguilera, R., 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 51, 880, 899 Aharony, A., 388, 389, 392, 405, 534 Ahr, W.H., 306, 545 Aigner, T., 83, 98, 101 AIME, 198,226 Akins, D.W. Jr., 532 A1-Hussainy, R., 592, 593,595,676 A1-Muhairy, A., 333,534 A1-Shaieb, Z., 810,861 A1-Zarafi, A., 332,534 Alameda, G.K., 53 7 Alberty, M., 166, 221 Algeo, T.J., 456, 534 Alger, R.P., 228, 793 Allen, D., 158, 203,221 Allen H.H.,532 Allen, W.W., 532 Alpay, O.A., 8, 28, 51 Alsharhan, A.S., 74, 90, 96, 98, 1O0 Aly, A., 544 Ambrose, R.W. Jr., 678 Ameri, S., 334, 534, 676 American Petroleum Institute, 118, 128, 149, 167, 178, 201,221 Aminian, K., 594, 676 Amott, E., 136, 149 Amthor, J.E., 48, 51,810, 838, 845, 856 Anderson, A.L., 544 Anderson, B.I., 223 Anderson, G., 108, 149
Anderson, J.H., 804, 810, 840, 860 Anderson, K.E., 93 7 Anderson, R.C., 532 Anderson, T.O., 28, 51 Anderson, W.G., 873, 899 Anderson, W.L., 208, 221 Andresen, K.H., 235,502, 534 Andrews, D.P., 541 Andriasov, R., 949 Angevine, C.L., 84, 98 Anstey, N.A., 68, 98 Antonlady, D.G., 51 Arab, N., 264, 534 Araktingi, U.G., 359, 384, 534, 535, 886, 891, 899 Archer, D.L., 902 Archer, J.S., 106, 108, 149 Archie, G.E., 133, 147, 149, 155, 163, 164, 168, 177, 178, 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 196, 197, 210, 217, 219, 221,481,534 Arifi, N.A., 681 Arkfeld, T.E., 226 Armstrong, EE., 28, 51 Armstrong, M., 902 Arnold, M.D., 9, 51 Aron, J., 224 Aronofsky, J.S., 260, 501,504, 534, 741,753, 769
Arps, J.J., 18, 20, 21, 23, 38, 51, 189, 221,534 Arribas, J.R.F., 859 Arya, A., 534 Atlas Wireline Services, 158, 169, 172, 180, 181, 189, 197, 198, 200, 205,207, 214, 222 Aubry, M.P., 100 Aud, W.W., 355, 356, 357, 534 Aufricht, W.R., 887, 899 Ausburn, B.E., 158, 215,222 Auzerais, E, 221 Avasthi, J.M., 55 Aves, H.S., 813,856 Ayesteran, L., 644, 677, 679 Ayoub, J.A., 676, 677, 678 Ayral, S., 152 Aziz, K., 546, 641,676
960 Babson, E.C., 251,252, 253,534 Bachman, R.C., 896, 900 Bachu, S., 888, 900 Back, W., 799, 856, 859 Backmeyer, L.A., 897,900 Bacon, M., 60, 101 Badley, M.E., 64, 65, 66, 68, 98 Bagley, J.W., Jr., 28, 54 Bajsarowicz, C., 151 Bakalowicz, M.J., 799, 800, 856 Baker, R.I., 534 Bakker, M., 8, 56 Baldwin, D.E., Jr., 28, 51 Balint, V., 812,856 Ball, M.M., 86, 98 Bally, A.W., 60, 98, 101, 103 Barbe, J.A., 302, 534 Barber, A.H.Jr., 285,302, 303,304, 305, 534 Barclay, W., 60, 101 Bardon, C., 52 Bardossy, G., 797, 807, 856 Barenblatt, G.I., 741,769 Barfield, E.C., 257,534 Barham, R.H., 679 Baria, L.R., 90, 99 Barnum, R.S., 297, 534 Baron, R.P., 52 Barr6n, T.R., 665, 676 Barton, C.C., 433,535 Barton, H.B., 532 Bashore, W.M., 433, 534, 535, 899 Baxendale, D., 679 Baxley, ET., 228 Bayer, J.E., 227 Be, A.W.H., 49, 55 Beales, EW., 56 Beals, R., 225 Beaudry, D., 93, 99 Bebout, D.G., 308, 309, 535, 538, 802, 813, 840, 856, 857, 858, 860, 861,885, 900 Beck, D.L., 52 BEG, 32, 33, 34, 54, 287,289, 290, 292, 293, 294, 298, 299, 302, 307, 308, 309, 310, 540
Behrens, R.A., 363, 364, 365,367, 368, 369, 378, 379, 387, 388, 433,452, 537, 539 Beier, R.A., 379, 387,432,535 Belfield, W.C., 810,856 Beliveau, D., 44, 51, 881,883,900 Bell, A.H.,240,535
Bell, J.S., 883,900 Benimeli, D.,223 Benson, D.J., 326, 542 Bereskin, S.R., 151,226 Berg, O.R., 60, 99, 856, 857, 862 Bergan, R.A., 229
Berger, B.D., 937 Berggren, W.A., 100 Bergosh, J.L., 117, 141, 142, 149, 206, 222 Bergt, D., 221 Bemthal, M.J., 83,102 Berry, V.J.Jr., 545 Bertrand, J-P., 535 Best, D.L., 221,229 Betzer, ER., 858 Bevan, T.G., 8 Beveridge, S.B., 489, 498, 499, 500, 501,535 Beydoun, Z.R., 332, 333, 503, 535 Bezdek, J., 99, 100, 101, 102 Bice, D., 83, 99 Biggs, W.P., 169, 205, 226, 227 Bilhartz, H.L., 222 Bilozir, D.E., 898,900 Binder, R.C., 940, 941,949 Bissell, H.J., 25, 52, 57, 536, 543, 901, 951,952 Bissell, R.C., 52 Biswas, G., 99, 100, 101, 102 Bitzer, K., 84, 99 Black, C.J.J., 52 Black, H.N., 335, 338, 339, 340, 341,343,344, 535
Black, J.L., Jr., 533 Blair, P.M., 260, 501,535 Blair, R.K., 52 Blanchet, EH., 8, 51 Blanton, J.R., 532 Bliefnick, D.M., 47, 51, 810, 838, 856 Bock, W.D., 98 Bocker, T., 797, 857 Bogli, J., 797, 85 7 Bohannan, D.L., 532 Bois, C., 832, 857 Bokn, I., 544 Bokserman, A.A., 44, 47, 51 Bond, J.G., 144, 149 Bonnie, R.J.M., 194, 222 Borg, I.Y., 535 Borgan, R.L., 532 Bosak, P., 797, 798, 799, 800, 806, 834, 856, 857, 858, 859, 862, 863, 864, 865
Bosellini, A., 856 Bosence, D., 83, 99 Bosscher, H., 281,535 Bostic, J.N., 644, 676 Botset, H.G., 19, 20, 51 Bouche, P., 85 7 Bourdet, D.P., 203,222, 563, 578, 580, 581, 651, 665, 676, 677, 678 Bourgeois, M.J., 644, 645, 677 Bourrouilh-Le Jan, EG., 797, 857 Bouvier, J.D., 56, 799, 800, 830, 851,857, 865 Bowen, B., 100
961 Boyeldieu, C., 214, 222,223 Boynton, R.S., 46, 51 Brace, W.F., 346, 535 Bradley, M.D., 538 Brady, T.J., 48, 51, 813, 845, 857 Braester, C., 678 Bramkamp, R.A., 533 Brandner, C.E, 897, 900 Bras, R.L., 540 Breland, J.A., 858 Brewster, J., 781, 782, 793 Brice, B.W., 542 Bridge, J.S., 83, 99 Brie, A., 223 Briens, F.J.L., 57, 546 Briggs, P.J., 46, 47, 52 Briggs, R.O., 207, 214, 222 Brigham, W.E., 680 Brimhall, R.M., 5 7, 546 Brinkmeyer, A., 545
Broding, R.A., 209, 222 Bromley, R.G., 782, 784, 793 Brons, E, 51,534, 679 Brooks, J., 794 Brooks, M., 60, 100 Broomhall, R.W., 45, 55 Brown, A.R., 158, 215, 222, 851,854, 857 Brown, C.A., 790, 793, 794 Brown, R.J.S., 181, 195,222, 466, 535 Brown, R.O., 207, 208, 222 Brown, S., 223 Brownrigg, R.L., 862 Bruce, W.A., 131,151, 177, 227, 253,533, 535 Bubb, J.N., 50, 52, 76, 99 Buchwald, R.W., 51, 534 Buckley, J.S., 200, 222, 873, 900 Buckley, S.E., 29, 52, 488, 489, 535 Bulnes, A.C., 233,256, 258, 535 Burchell, P.W., 532 Burchfield, T.E., 871,899, 902 Burgess, R.J., 51,676 Burk, C.A., 151 Burke, J.A., 169, 222 Burns, G.K., 540, 793 Busch, D.A., 810, 816, 825,840, 858 Bush, D.C., 139, 149 Butler, J.R., 222 Button, D.M., 545 Bykov, V.N., 812, 861 Byrd, W.D., 50, 52 Byrne, R.H., 858 Cady, G.C., 680 Caldwell, R.L., 5 7, 229 Calhoun, J.C., Jr., 38, 57, 296, 547 Callow, G.O., 256, 544
Calvert, T.J., 192,222 Campa, M.E, 28, 52 Campbell, EL., 158, 197, 225 Campbell, R.L., Jr., 222 Campbell, N.D.J., 51, 85 7 Candelaria, M.P., 51,797, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 865
Cannon, R., 99, 100, 101, 102, 900 Canter, K.L., 811,857, 865 Carannante, G., 79, 102 Cardwell, W.T., 888, 900 Cargile, L.L.,533 Carlson, L.O., 897, 900 Carlton, L.A., 55, 679 Carmichael, R.S., 128, 150, 168, 179, 193,222 Carnes, ES., 28, 52 Carpenter, B.N., 810, 85 7 Carroll, H.B., Jr., 56, 358, 539, 542, 901,903 Carslaw, H.S., 677 Carter, N.L., 535 Carter, R.D., 676 Carver, R.E., 139, 150, 167, 178, 202, 213,222 Cassan, J.P., 878, 880, 902 Castellana, ES., 152 Castillo, E, 859 Castillo-Tejero, C., 813,820, 830, 832, 847, 864 Castro Orjuela, A., 222 Catacosinos, P.A., 810, 828, 849, 857 Caudle, B.H., 456,545 Chace, D.M., 173,222, 224 Chakrabarty, C., 432, 535 Chandler, M.A., 133,150 Chaney, ER., 260, 501,544 Chang, D.M., 370, 539 Chang, J., 535 Chang, M.M., 151, 312,315, 322, 323,324, 535, 540
Chapman, R.E., 537 Charlson, G.S., 160, 222 Chatas, A.T., 677 Chatzis, I., 879, 898, 900, 901 Chauvel, Y., 207, 214, 222 Chayes, E, 265, 535 Chemali, R., 228 Chen, H-K., 332,333,535 Chen, H.C., 363, 535, 537 Chen, H.Y., 544 Chen, M., 224 Chen, S., 28, 390, 535 Chen, Z., 133,150 Cheng, S.W.L., 862 Chenowith, P.A., 806, 857 Cheong, D.K., 100 Cheung, ES., 223,227 Chichowicz, L., 41, 55 Chilingar, G.V., 24, 25, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 233,
962 390, 536, 542, 543, 544, 546, 869, 877, 900, 901,909, 951,952, 953, 954, 956 Chilingarian, G.V., 1, 4, 34, 47, 52, 54, 55, 231, 254, 268, 274, 275, 280, 389, 390, 417, 466, 468, 536, 537, 539, 541, 543, 545, 677, 681,834, 861,882, 901,937
Chopra, A.K., 435,544 Choquette, P.W., 52, 254, 268, 536, 542, 793, 797, 798, 799, 801,802, 803, 805, 806, 814, 832, 833,834, 845, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861,863
Chork, C.Y., 539 Chuber, S., 787, 793, 794 Chuoke, R.L., 900 Cichowitz, L., 679 Cinco-Ley, H., 203, 210, 223, 317, 320, 321, 536, 545, 559, 563,575,584, 596, 601, 607, 615, 621,623,625,630, 633,638, 646, 651,652, 656, 657, 673,677, 678, 680
Cisne, J.L., 84,99 Clark, B., 221 Clark, C.N., 545 Clark, D.G., 580, 581,677 Clark, J.B., 297, 536 Clark, K.K., 27, 41, 52, 677, 680 Clausing, R.G., 306, 536 Clavier, C., 164, 169, 198, 223 Clay, T.W., 533 Claycomb, E., 329, 536 Clayton, J.L., 794 Clerke, E.A., 28, 52, 165,209, 223 Cloetingh, S., 84, 99 Coalson, E.B., 534 Coates, G.R., 182, 195,203,205,223 Coats, K.H., 369, 536, 641,642, 677 Cobban, W.A., 792, 793 Cochrane, J.T.H., 542 Cockerham, P.W., 678 Coffeen, J.A., 59, 99 Coffin, P.E., 794 Cohen, M.H., 545 Coles, M.E., 135, 150, 168, 179, 223 Collins, E.W., 787, 794 Colson, L., 53, 225 Conley, F.R., 19, 53 Connally, T.C., 860 Coogan, A.H., 241,242, 536, 813, 825, 831, 85 7 Cook, H.E., 858 Coonts, H.L., 532 Corbett, K.P., 8, 52, 786, 787, 793 Core Laboratories, 123, 132, 136, 139, 140, 144, 145,150 Coruh, C., 60, 101 Cotter, W.H., 533 Cottrell, T.L., 536
Coufleau, M.A., 226 Coulter, G.R., 334, 536 Couri, F., 678 Cove de Murville, E., 52 Crabtree, P.T., 152, 229, 546 Crabtree, S.J., 900 Craft, B.C., 18, 52, 234, 245, 246, 282, 536, 956, 95 7
Craft, M., 141,151, 794 Crafton, J.W., 793 Craig, D.H., 52, 805,812, 831,832, 836, 837, 842, 844, 847, 856, 857 Craig, F.F., 35, 37, 48, 52, 56, 545, 870, 873, 874, 882, 900 Crary, S., 208,209, 223 Crawford, D.A., 677 Crawford, G.E., 611, 677 Crawford, P.B., 28, 51, 52, 676 Craze, R.C., 3, 52, 233, 247, 536 Crevello, P.D., 99, 102, 794, 857 Crichlow, H.B., 363, 375,536 Criss, C.R., 533 Cromwell, D.W., 51,856, 859, 861,862, 864 Crookson, R.B., 55 Cross, T.A., 100, 101, 102 Crow, W.L., 345, 346, 536 Crowe, C.W., 356, 536 Crump III, J.J., 228 Cullen, A.W., 533 Cunningham, B.K., 51,856, 859, 861,862, 864 Cunningham, L.E., 676 Curtis, G.R., 533 Cussey, R., 858 Dagan, G., 368, 536 Dake, L.P., 18, 27, 312, 536 Damsleth, E., 53, 358, 539, 886, 901 Dangerfield, J., 793 Daniel, E.J., 3, 52, 813, 840, 858 Daniels, P.A., 85 7
DaPrat, G., 677 Dauben, D.L., 53 7 Davidson, D.A., 505,507, 508, 536 Davies, D.H., 214, 215,223 Davies, D.K., 140, 150, 178, 184, 202, 223,224 Davies, R., 227 Davis, E.F., 302, 536 Davis, H.T., 544 Davis, J.A., 42, 52 Davison, I., 11O, 150, 213,223 Dawans, J.M., 56, 865 Dawe, R.A., 678 Day, P.I., 151,225 de Graaf, J.D., 150 de Figueiredo, R.J.P., 103 de Swaan, O.A., 677
963 de Waal, J.A., 133, 150 de Waal, P.J., 226 de Witte, L., 394, 546 Dean, M.C., 224 Deans, H.A., 150, 158, 223,539 Dees, J.M., 334, 536 DeHaas, R.J., 810, 836, 837, 844, 858 Delaney, R.P., 882, 883, 900 Delaune, P.L., 199, 223 Delhomme, J.P., 365, 536 Dembicki, H., 225 Demicco, R.V., 83, 99, 102 DeMille, G., 800,858 Demko, S., 427, 537 Dempsey, J.R., 536 Dennis, B., 223 Denoo, S., 223 Denoyelle, L., 11,52 Deryuck, B.G., 677 Desbrisay, C.L., 42, 52 Desch, J.B., 381,383,384, 537 Dewan, J.T., 158, 180, 197, 223 D'Heur, M., 781, 783, 793 Dickey, P.A., 240, 537 Dickson, J.A.D., 783, 794 Diederix, K.M., 139, 153 Diemer, K., 535 DiFoggio, R., 152, 229, 546 Dines, K., 158, 215,223 Dixon, T.N., 677 Dobrin, M.B., 63, 69, 70, 99 Dodd, J.E., 98 Dodson, T., 151 DOE, 277, 278, 280, 281,537 Doe, P.H., 200, 224 Dogru, A.H., 659, 677 Doh, C.A., 228 Doll, H.G., 168, 204, 223,227 Dolly, E.D., 810, 816, 825, 840, 858 Domenico, S.N., 158, 223 Dominguez, A.N., 677 Dominguez, G.C., 375,537, 545, 550, 677, 681 Donaldson, E.C., 136, 150 Donohoe, C.W., 532 Donohue, D.A.T., 158, 223 Doolen, G.D., 535 Doughty, D., 545 Douglas, A.A., 222, 676 Douglas, R.G., 49, 56, 773, 793, 794 Dove, R.E., 53, 225 Dowdall, W., 94, 101 Dowling, P.L., 42, 52, 256, 537 Doyle, M., 98, 101 Doyle, R.E., 376, 378, 537 Doyle-Read, F.M., 883,903 Dresser Atlas, 173,224
Drews, W.E, 677 Driscoll, V.J., 302, 537 Dromgoole, E., 83, 99, 101 Dubey, S.T., 150, 200, 224 Dublyansky, V.N., 799, 858 Dubois, D., 363, 537 Dubois, J., 546 Duchek, M.E, 222 Dufurrena, C.K., 810, 811,830, 862 Dullien, EA.L., 875,900, 901 Dumanoir, J.L., 169, 179, 205, 223,224 Dunham, R.J., 256, 537 Dunn, P.A., 100 Dunnington, H.V., 696, 697, 769 Duns, H., 546 Duong, A.N., 658, 677 Dupuy, M., 543 Duran, R., 679 Durbin, D., 229 Durham, T.E., 861 Dussan, E., 221 Dussert, P., 48, 53, 813, 831,838, 844, 858 Dyer, R.C., 60, 100 Dyes, A.B., 679 Dykes, F.R.Jr., 532 Dykstra, H., 34, 53, 290, 436, 537 Dzulynski, S., 797, 858 Ealey, P.J., 893, 902 Earlougher, R.C., Jr., 196, 203,224, 549, 553, 563,584, 614, 632, 636, 677 Earlougher, R.C. Jr., Eaton, B.A., 39, 53 Ebanks, W.J., 811,830, 840, 858 Eberli, G.P., 84, 85, 99 Economides, M.J., 539, 632, 678 Edelstein, W.A., 134, 150, 152, 179, 184, 224, 229, 546 Edgar, T.F., 677 Edie, R.W., 812, 814, 825, 858 Edmunson, H., 128, 150, 168, 179, 193,224 Edwards, C.M., 544 Effs, D.J.Jr., 538 Egemeier, S.J., 799, 858 Eggert, K., 535 Ehlers, E.G., 139, 150 Ehlig-Economides, C.A., 656, 658, 678 Ehrlich, R., 55, 140, 150, 178, 224, 413,537, 873,900 Eidel, J.J., 85 7 Eijpe, R., 436, 537 Ekdale, A.A., 782, 784, 793 Ekstrom, M.P., 207, 214, 224 EI-Ghussein, B.F., 52 E1-Rabaa, A.W.M., 55 Elkins, L.F., 2, 8, 28, 44, 45, 53, 302, 486, 487,
964 489,533,537
Elliott, G.R., 248, 537 Ellis, D., 54, 128, 150, 158, 168, 179, 193, 224, 225 Elrod, J.A., 100 Emanuel, A.S., 365, 366, 369, 371,372, 373, 375, 378, 379, 380, 381,382, 384, 387, 537
Enderlin, M.B., 224 Energy Resources Conservation Board, 38, 53, 549, 678, 867, 869, 895, 900 Engler, P., 151 Enos, P., 177, 224, 858 Entzminger, D.J., 811,834, 837, 847, 858 Eremenko, N.A., 234, 537 Ertekin, T., 158, 223 Esteban, M., 797, 798, 802, 803, 804, 805,806, 807, 808, 812, 818, 820, 847, 856, 858, 861, 863, 865
Euwer, R.M., 858 Evans, D.M., 56 Evans, M.E., 810, 811,857 Ewing, T.E., 538, 546 Eyles, D.R., 89, 101 Fair, ES., 645, 678 Fairbridge, R.W., 57, 901,951,952 Faivre, O., 223 Falconer, I., 221 Fanchi, J.R., 322, 537 Fang, J.H., 363, 535, 537 Fanning, K.A., 799, 858 Faraguna, J.K., 207, 214, 224 Farid, E.A., 333,534 Farouq Ali, S.M., 535 Farrell, H.E., 777, 779, 782, 784, 793 Fassihi, M.R., 284, 285, 289, 291,292, 293, 537 Fast, C.R., 297, 540 Fatt, I., 257, 389, 537, 538 Feazel, C.T., 777, 779, 782, 783, 784, 793, 794 Feder, J., 534 Feldkamp, L., 541 Felsenthal, M., 3, 8, 9, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 44, 53
Fenwick, M., 534 Ferreira, A.E., 223 Ferrell, H.H., 3, 8, 9, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 44, 53 Ferrier, J.J., 46, 56 Ferris, J.A., 152, 228 Ferris, M.A., 545, 902 Fertal, T.G., 542 Fertl, W.H., 8, 53, 235,537 Festoy, S., 769 Fetkovich, M.J., 304, 306, 538, 649, 678
Fetkovich, R.B., 543 Fickert, W.E., 532 Finch, W.C., 533 Finke, M., 227 Firoozabadi, A., 473,538 Fisher, W.L., 275, 538 Fitting, R.U.Jr., 233,256, 258, 535 Flaum, C., 150, 224 Flemmings, P.B., 84, 99, 100 Fligelman, H., 596,678 Flis, J.E., 861 Flock, D.L., 874, 902 Flores, D.P., 57, 546 Flynn, J.J., 100 Flynn, P.E., 859 Foed, D.C., 859 Fogg, G.E., 535, 541,891,900 Folk, R.L., 258, 538 Fong, D.K., 55 Fons, L., 213,224 Fontaine, J.M., 812, 848, 849, 851,858 Ford, A., 795 Ford, B.D., 864 Ford, D.C., 797, 798, 799, 800, 801,806, 834, 835, 841,842, 856, 857, 858, 859, 862, 863, 864, 865
Fordham, E., 221 Forgotson, J.M., 864 Fortin, J.P., 207, 214, 215,224 Frank, J.R., 532 Frascogna, X.M., 533 Fraser, C.D., 28, 53 Freedman, R., 226 Freeman, B.E, 543 Freeman, D.L., 140, 150, 167, 224 Freeman, H.A., 503,504, 538 French, J.A., 83, 99, 101 Frey, D.D., 56 Frick, T.C., 536 Friedman, G.M., 48, 50, 51,254, 544, 769, 775, 783, 793, 810, 838, 845,856 Friedman, M., 52, 694, 695, 769, 793 Frisinger, R., 223 Fritz, M., 810, 858 Fritz, R.D., 865 Frohlich, C., 84, 101 Frost, E., 226, 227 Frost, S.H., 813,840, 859 Frydl, P.M., 56, 898, 900 Frykman, P., 794 Fu, C., 535 Fuchs, Y., 797, 856, 858 Full, W.E., 59, 900 Fuller, J.G.C.M., 801,858, 860 Fulleylove, R.J., 52 Furlong, K.P., 84, 102
965 Gale, J.E., 56 Galloway, W.E., 233,275,276, 538, 546 Gamson, B.W., 181, 195,222, 466, 535 Garaicochea Petrirena, E, 538 Garat, J., 225 Garcia-Sineriz, B., 799, 812,859 Gardner, G.H.E, 229 Gardner, J.S., 169, 179, 224, 227 Garfield, R.F., 533 Garfield, T.R., 811,840, 859 Garrett, C.M.Jr., 538, 546 Garrison, J.R.Jr., 267, 268, 269, 270, 271,272, 415, 417, 538
Garrison, R.E., 773, 793 Gatewood, L.E., 810, 827, 831,832, 837, 859 Gealy, F.D.Jr., 532 Geertsma, J., 769 Geesaman, R.C., 811,840, 857, 859, 865 Geffen, T.M., 52, 481,545 Gehr, J.A., 56 Geldart, L.P., 102 George, C.J., 33, 34, 53, 534 George, C.P., 902 Georgi, D.T., 133, 140, 150, 201,211,212, 224 Gevers, E.C.A., 85 7 Gewers, C.W., 38, 53, 472, 473,538 Ghauri, W.K., 302, 538, 882, 901 Gianzero, M., 228 Giger, F.M., 324, 538 Gilbert, L., 98 Gildner, R.E, 99 Gill, D., 801, 811,830, 859 Gillen, M., 223 Gillson, J.L., 51 Gilreath, J.A., 213,224 Gimatudinov, Sh., 949 Ginsburg, R.N., 84, 85, 92, 99, 100 Glaister, R.P., 868, 902 Glazek, J., 807, 834, 856, 857, 858, 859, 862, 863, 864, 865
Gleeson, J.W., 466, 468, 538 Glenn, E.E., 5 7, 229 Gnatyuk, R.A., 56 Godbold, A.C., 54, 533 Goetz, J.F., 207, 214, 224 Goggin, D.J., 150, 436, 538, 539 Goldhammer, R.K., 84, 99, 100, 101 Golf-Racht, T.D. van, 141, 142, 150, 205,206, 224 Golson, J.G., 793 Gonzales, H.T., 51 Goode, P.A., 221,542 Goodknight, R.C., 257, 538 Goodman, A.G., 858 Goolsby, J.L., 532 Goolsby, S.M., 794, 860, 862, 863
Goss, L.E., 532 Gould, T.L., 285, 286, 538 ~: Gounot, M-T., 223 Govier, G.W., 680 Govorova, G., 949 Gradstein, F.M., 85, 100 Graham, J.W., 44, 53, 260, 501,502, 539 Graham, S.K., 542 Grant, C.W., 436, 438, 439, 440, 452, 453,454, 456, 539 Grau, J., 53, 225 Graus, R.R., 83, 100 Graves, E.D. Jr., 957 Gray, L.L., 54, 533 Gray, R., 532 Gray, T.A., 435, 539 Greaves, K.H., 151,226 Grebe, J.J., 296, 539 Gregory, A.R., 229 Grier, S.P., 151,228 Gries, R.R., 60, 100 Grine, D.R., 226 Gringarten, A.C., 203, 210, 224, 563,580, 597, 614, 641,656, 658, 678, 680 Grotzinger, J.P., 84, 100 Grover, G.A., 100 Groves, D.L., 258, 539 Gryte, C.C., 152 Guangming, Z., 48, 53, 806, 810, 825, 832, 837, 838, 845, 859 Guillory, A.J., 194, 225 Guindy, A., 223 Guise, D.R., 900 Gulati, M.S., 680, 681 Gunter, J.M., 197, 199, 200, 224 Gussow, W.C., 236, 237, 239, 240, 539 Gustavino, Lic.L., 544 Guti6rrez, R.M.E., 633,678 Gutman, S., 535 Gutschick, K.A., 46, 51 Guy, B.T., 863 Guyod, H., 190, 224 Guzman, E.J., 832, 859 Gysen, M., 166, 224 Hache, J-M., 221 Hadley, G.F., 486, 539 Hagerdom, A.R., 677 Hagoort, J., 498, 501,539 Haidl, EM., 860 Halbouty, M.T., 48, 52, 53, 795, 806, 807, 857, 859, 860, 862, 863, 864, 865
Haldorsen, H.H., 53, 358, 363, 370, 539, 884, 886, 901 Halliburton Logging Services, Inc., 169, 170, 171,172, 180, 189, 190, 197, 198, 200,
966 205,207, 214, 221,224 Hallock, P., 77, 100 Halsey, T.C., 410, 423,430, 539 Ham, W.E., 537, 953 Hammond, P., 221 Hamon, G., 250, 539 Han, B., 799, 800, 859 Hancock, J.M., 782, 793 Handford, C.R., 810, 834, 836, 837, 839, 843, 844, 861
Handy, L.L., 260, 486, 539 Hansen, A., 534 Hansen, J.P., 414, 539 Hansen, K.S., 131 Hanshaw, B.B., 799, 856, 859 Haq, B., 82, 85, 98, 100 Harbaugh, J.W., 84, 99, 102, 867, 901 Hardenbol, J., 100 Hardie, L.A., 100 Hardman, R., 150, 224 Hardman, R.EP., 782, 793 Hardy, H.H., 379, 387, 534, 535, 539 Harper, M.L., 50, 53 Harris, A.J.P.M., 863 Harris, J.D., 533 Harris, J.F., 8, 53 Harris, M.T., 99 Harris, P.M., 56, 99, 100, 103, 539, 793, 794, 800, 812, 840, 858, 859, 860, 861,863 Harrison, W., 234, 546, 85 7 Harvey, A.H., 540 Harvey, R.L., 811,814, 822, 831,859 Harville, D.G., 140, 141,150, 151, 167, 224, 227 Hashmy, K.H., 166, 221,224 Hassan, T.H., 100 Hastings, B.S., 56 Haszeldine, R.S., 11O, 150, 213,223 Hatlelid, W.G., 50, 52, 76, 99 Havlena, D., 888, 889, 901 Hawkins, M.E, 18, 52, 234, 245,246, 282, 536 Hawkins, M.E Jr., 587, 588, 678 Haymond, D., 785, 786, 787, 793 Hazebroek, P., 39, 53, 679, 680 Hazen, G.A., 229 Heard, H.C., 535 Heaviside, J., 435,539 Heifer, K.J., 8, 53 Heim, A., 223 Helland-Hansen, W., 83, 100 Heller, J.P., 150 Henderson, G., 223 Henderson, J.H., 536 Henderson, K.S., 810, 831,859 Hendrickson, A.R., 334, 539 Hendrickson, G.E., 28, 32, 34, 35, 53
Henry, J.C., 532 Henry, W.E., 794 Hensel, W.M., Jr., 205,225 Hentschel, H.G.E., 410, 423,539 Herald, F.A., 533 Herbeck, E.F., 532 Herchenroder, B.E., 100 Herman, J.S., 856 Herriot, H.P., 532 Herron, M.M., 54, 205,223,225 Herron, S.L., 27, 53, 181,225 Hertzog, R.C., 27, 53, 173, 175, 181,195,225, 229 Hester, C.T., 45, 54 Heuer, G.J., 27, 32, 56 Hewett, T.A., 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371,378, 379, 387, 388, 433, 452, 534, 537, 539 Hewitt, R., 100 Heymans, M.J., 857 Hickman, W.B., 544, 952 Hicks, P.J., Jr., 136, 150, 461,539 Hill, C.A., 799, 800, 805,859 Hiltz, R.G., 532 Hine, A.C., 100 Hingle, A.T., 169, 197, 225 Hinkley, D.V., 901 Hinrichsen, E.L., 534 Hirasaki, G.J., 136, 137, 150 Hnatiuk, J., 237, 238, 533, 540 Ho, T.T.Y., 225 Hobson, G.D., 865 Hocott, C.R., 535, 540 Hodges, L., 537 Hoffman, L.J.B., 167, 225 Hohn, M.E., 363, 365,540 Holcomb, S.V., 57, 229 Holden, W.R., 956, 957 Holditch, S.A., 349, 540, 541 Holm, L.W., 44, 54 Hoist, P.H., 52 Holtz, M.H., 296, 298, 300, 540, 810, 830, 838, 859
Honarpour, M.M., 17, 54, 290, 443,540 Hoogerbrugge, P.J., 225 Hook, R.C., 810, 859 Hoover, R.S., 340, 344, 540 Hopkinson, E.C., 229 Horacek, I., 856, 857, 858, 859, 862, 863, 864, 865
Horkowitz, K.O., 537 Homby, B.E., 215,223,225 Home, R.N., 549, 580, 581,636, 642, 644, 645, 656, 657, 659, 677, 678, 680 Homer, D.R., 646, 678 Horsefield, R., 200, 225,237, 413,533, 540
967 Horstmann, L.E., 329, 540, 785, 793 Hoss, R.L., 532 Hotz, R.E, 537 Hovdan, M., 330, 542 Hove, A., 136, 137, 150 Hovorka, S.D., 811,859 Howard, G.C., 297, 540 Howard, J.J., 134, 150, 151,203,224, 225 Howell, J.V., 861,864 Howell, W.D., 51 Howes, B.J., 869, 895, 896, 901 Hoyle, W., 223 Hrametz, A., 225 Hriskevich, M.E., 78, 100 Hsu, K.J., 56, 223, 794 Hubbert, M.K., 39, 54 Hudson, J.A., 10, 54 Hudson, W.K., 148 Huijbregts, C.J., 363, 364, 365,541,891,901 Huinong, Z., 678 Huitt, J.L., 3, 54 Humphrey, J.D., 84, 100 Hunt, E.R., 227 Hunt, P.K., 136, 151 Hunter, B.E., 55 Hurley, T.J., 28, 54 Hurst, H.E., 366, 387, 540 Hurst, J.M., 94, 100 Hurst, R.E., 334, 540 Hurst, W., 540, 553, 587, 644, 678, 681 Hutchinson, C.A. Jr., 679 Hutfilz, J.M., 678 Huxley, T.H., 793 Huzarevich, J.V., 532 Hyland, G.R., 112,151
860, 863
Jaminski, J., 534 Jantzen, R.E., 138, 151 Jardine, D.J., 255,256, 259, 496, 497, 541, 867, 869, 901 Jardon, M.A., 542, 547 Jargon, J.R., 641,644, 678 Jasti, J.K., 457, 541 Jeffers, D., 151, 228 Jeffreys, P., 214, 222 Jenkins, R.E., 139, 149 Jenkyns, H.C., 56, 794 Jennings, J.N., 797, 860 Jennings, J.W., 540 Jennings, H.Y., Jr., 188, 228 Jensen, J.L., 886, 901 Jensen, M.H., 365, 539 Jenyon, M.K., 849, 860 Jesion, G., 541 Jie, T., 100 Jodry, R.L., 131,151, 177, 225, 250, 258, 282, 475,481,541,801,860 Johnson, C.E., 480, 541 Johnson, D., 223 Johnson, K.S., 797, 857, 859, 860, 861,863, 864,865
Johnson, M.C., 533 Johnston, J.R., 542 Johnston, L.K., 214, 215, 225 Jones, M.W., 810, 836, 837, 844, 858 Jones, E, 584, 679 Jones, S.C., 133, 150, 201,224, 436, 541 Jones, T., 900 Jones, T.A., 4, 54 Jones-Parra, J., 260, 261,262, 488, 489, 541, 954
ICE 32, 33, 34, 54, 256, 287, 289, 290, 292, 293,294, 298, 299, 301,302, 307, 308, 309, 310, 540 IHRDC, 108, 115, 116, 151 Ijirigho, B.T., 810, 859 Ijjasz-Vasquez, E.J., 399, 411, 412, 540 Ikwuakor, K.C., 540 Illing, L.V., 812, 814, 830, 860 IOCC, 282, 284, 285,286, 287, 288, 540 Iwai, K., 56
Jossang, T., 534 Journel, A.G., 363, 364, 365, 541, 891,901
Jaap, W.C., 100 Jackson, S.R., 540 Jacob, C.E., 638, 678 Jacobson, L.A., 173, 181,195,225,229 Jaeger, J.C., 677 Jain, A., 678 Jain, K.C., 103 James, N.P., 52, 92, 100, 797, 798, 799, 801, 803,805, 806, 814, 833, 834, 857, 858,
Kaasscheiter, J.P.H., 545 Kabir, C.S., 549, 580, 615,656, 679, 681 Kadanoff, L.P., 401,539, 541 Kaluza, T.J., 54 Kansas Geological Society, 532, 533 Kantzas, A., 898, 900, 901 Karakas, M., 679 Katz, A.J., 267, 270, 271,415, 541 Katz, D.L., 473,538, 541, 593, 681
Jordan, C.F., 813, 830, 860 Jordan, J.K., 534 Jordan, T.E., 84, 99, 1O0 Jorden, J.R., 158, 197, 221,225,227 Jorgensen, N.O., 782, 793 Joseph, J.A., 658, 678 Joshi, S.D., 296, 311,312, 313, 316, 317, 318, 319,320,321,324,541
968 Kaveler, H.H., 20, 54, 533 Kaye, B.H., 273,541 Kazi, A., 534 Keany, J., 793 Kearey, P., 60, 100 Keelan, D.K., 108, 119, 128, 130, 139, 141,151, 887, 901 Keith, B.D., 858 Kellan, D.K., 481,484, 485,541 Kendall, C.G.St.C., 50, 56, 59, 74, 82, 83, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 383, 542 Kennedy, J.E., 53 7 Kennedy, S.K., 900 Kennedy, W.J., 782, 794 Kent, D.M., 254, 258, 541, 812, 830, 860 Kent, D.V., 100 Kenworthy, J.D., 532 Kenyon, W.E., 134, 151,203,225,226 Kerans, C., 47, 54, 545, 810, 812, 830, 831,837, 838, 842, 844, 848, 851,859, 860, 902 Kern, C.A., 215, 216, 225 Kettle, R.W., 102 Keys, D.A., 102 Khutorov, A.M., 813,860 Kidwell, C.M., 194, 225 Kienitz, C., 221 Kimminau, S., 227 King, E., 151,226 King, P.R., 368, 388, 392, 401,402, 403,404, 405,423,541,901 King, R.E., 55, 402, 769, 859, 861,863, 865 King, R.L., 898, 901 Kinney, E.E., 532 Kirman, P.A., 679 Kittridge, M.G., 161,195,225,436, 438,439, 541
Klappa, C.F., 858 Klikoff, W.A., 538 Klinkenberg, B., 263,541 Klitgord, K.D., 100 Klute, C.H., 257, 541 Kniazeff, V.J., 678 Knox, S.C., 810, 831,859 Kochina, I.N., 769 Koederitz, L.E, 540 Koen, A.D., 325,541 Koerschner III, W.F., 83, 100 Kolata, D.R., 857 Kopaska-Merkel, D.C., 542 Koplik, J., 546 Kordos, L., 807, 856 Korvin, G., 366, 388, 541 Kozic, H.G., 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351,541 Krajewski, S.A., 102 Kretzschmar, J.L., 158, 215,225 Krief, M., 172, 180, 225
Kriss, H.S., 41, 56 Krohn, C.E., 264, 265,266, 409, 541 Kruger, J.M., 811,860 Kuchuk, F.J., 542, 644, 645,658, 677, 679 Kuich, N., 326, 328, 329, 542, 785, 786, 787, 788, 794
Kumar, A., 541,549, 563, 680, 681 Kumar, S., 937 Kunkel, G.C., 28, 54 Kupecz, J.A., 81 O, 860 Kuranov, I.F., 681 Kyle, J.R., 44, 55, 797, 860 Lacaze, J., 858 Lacey, J.W., 532 Lacik, H.A., 533 Ladwein, H.W., 812, 824, 860 LaFleur, R.G., 862 Lai, F.S.Y., 900 Laidlaw, W.G., 874, 901 Lair, G.H., 952 Lake, L.W., 56, 150, 358, 363,370, 371,378, 534, 538, 539, 541,542, 867, 884, 888, 901,903
Lambeck, K., 99 Lanaud, R., 858 Landel, P.A., 678 Lane, B.B., 28, 54 Langdon, G.S., 75, 81,101 Langford, B.J., 952 Langnes, G.L., 17, 23, 54, 542, 544, 937 Langston, E.P., 679, 872, 883, 884, 885, 894, 901
Lanz, R.C., 85 7 LaPoint, P.R., 10, 54 Lapre, J.F., 795, 885, 901 Larsen, E., 433,535 Larsen, G., 536, 909, 951 Larsen, L., 330, 542 Larsen, W.K., 53 7 Larson, R.G., 534 Larson, V.C., 532 Lasseter, E., 229 Lasseter, T.J., 893, 901 Latham, J.W., 810, 831,860 Latimer, J.R.Jr., 532 Laughlin, B.A., 302, 310, 542, 547 LaVigne, J., 227 Lawrence, D.T., 59, 82, 83, 98, 101 Le Lan, P., 227 LeBlanc, D.P., 158, 225 Lee, J.E., 488, 489, 490, 492, 494, 496, 542 Lee, J.I., 42, 54 Lee, R.L., 595,679 Lee, W.J., 563,679 Leeder, M.R., 83, 99
969 Lefebvre du Prey, E.J., 875,901 Legere, R.E, 900 Leibrock, R.M., 532 Leighton, M.W., 857 Lemaitre, R., 542 Lents, M.R., 36, 55 Lerche, I., 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 55, 83, 99, 100, 101
Leroy, G., 710, 769 Lesage, M., 221 Letton, W.III, 226 Leverett, M.C., 19, 20, 29, 52, 54, 131, 151, 177,226 Levorsen, A.I., 236, 542, 806, 860 Levy, M., 535 Lewis, W.B., 19, 20, 54 Li, M., 810, 860 Li, Y., 873,901 Lichtenberger, G.J., 327, 328, 329, 330, 331,542 Lieberkind, K., 794 Lindsay, J.E, 102 Lindsay, R.F., 383, 537, 542 Lishman, J.R., 887, 901 Little, T.M., 226 Littlefield, M., 2, 54, 533 Liu, H., 864 Liu, O., 223 Lloyd, P., 223 Lloyd, R.M., 102 Locke, C.D., 56 Locke, S., 224 Lockridge, J.E, 790, 792, 794 Logan, R.W., 679 Lohman, J.W., 678 Lomando, A.J., 793, 859, 863 Lomas, A.T., 225 Lomiz6, G.M., 4, 5, 6, 54 Longman, M.W., 291,542, 791,794, 811,840, 859, 860, 862, 863
Lord, C.S., 501,542 Lord, G.D., 142, 149, 151,206, 222, 226 Lorenz, P.B., 150 Loucks, R.G., 804, 810, 813,834, 836, 837, 839, 840, 843,844, 847, 856, 858, 860, 861
Louis, C., 4, 54 Lovell, J., 223 Lowenstam, H.A., 811,840, 861 Lowry, D.C., 101 Lucia, EJ., 177, 178, 184, 186, 190, 202,226, 535, 541,545, 868,900, 901, 902 Luque, R.E, 546 Lyle, D., 326, 542 Lynch, M., 810, 861 Lytle, R.J., 158, 215,223
MacAllister, D.J., 458, 459, 461,542 MacDonald, I.F., 900 MacDonell, P.E., 900 MacEachem, J.A., 860 Maclnnis, J., 226 Macintyre, I.G., 100 Mackenzie, F.T., 784, 794 Macovski, A., 457, 542 Macrygeorgas, C.A., 680 Maerefat, N.L., 151 Magara, K., 8, 54 Maggio, C., 85 7 Magnuson, W.L., 538, 901 Maher, C.E., 51, 85 7 Mahmood, S.M., 133,151,468, 545 Main, R., 536, 956 Maksimovich, G.A, 812, 861 Malecek, S.J., 75, 81,101 Maliva, R.G., 783, 794 Malone, W.T., 545 Mamedov, Y.G., 51 Mancini, E.A., 326, 359, 542 Mandelbrot, B.B., 263,264, 270, 365, 366, 372, 407, 410, 422, 542, 543 Mann, J., 900 Mann, M.M., 151,228 Mann, S.D., 542 Manning, M., 227 Mannon, R.W., 52, 53, 289, 542, 543, 544, 546, 9O0
Manual, T., 151 Mapstone, N.B., 50, 54 Marafi, H., 812, 830, 840, 861 Marchant, L.C., 45, 46, 54 Marek, B.F., 150, 223 Maricelli, J.J., 213,224 Markowitz, G., 214, 215,225 Marks, T.R., 149, 222 Marrs, D.G., 532 Marsden, S.S., 943,949 Marshall, J.W., 44, 55 Martell, B., 640, 679 Martin, EG., 8, 55 Martin, J.C., 378, 543 Martin, J.E, 227 Martin, R., 48, 55, 98, 806, 812, 822, 823,861 Martin, W.E., 44, 5 7 Martinelli, J.W., 237, 238, 533, 540 Martinez, A.R., 679 Martinez del Olmo, W., 847, 856, 861 Martinez, R.N., 679 Maslov, V.E, 861 Mass6, L., 534, 769 Mast, R.F., 535 Masters, C.D., 546 Masuda, E, 101
970 Mathews, M.A., 152, 229 Mattar, L., 681 Mattavelli, L., 25, 26, 55 Mattax, C.C., 44, 55 Matthews, C.S., 39, 53, 55, 203, 210, 226, 549, 584, 654, 679 Matthews, R.K., 84, 101 Maute, R.E., 190, 226 May, J.A., 89, 101 Mayer, C., 166, 224, 226 Mazzocchi, E.F., 44, 55 Mazzullo, L.J., 811,830, 861 Mazzullo, S.J., 1, 34, 47, 52, 54, 231,254, 256, 268, 280, 417, 468, 536, 537, 539, 541, 543, 545, 677, 681, 800, 802, 803, 804, 810, 811,812, 818, 825, 830, 834, 861, 862, 863, 882, 901 McCaleb, J.A., 32, 45, 56, 359, 360, 361,362, 533, 811,814, 830, 862 McCammon, R., 900 McCauley, J.L., 273, 391,392, 393,394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 407, 409, 413, 539, 543, 544
McCleb, J.A., 546 McCord, J.R., 677 McCormack, R.K., 102 McCormick, L.M., 862 McCormick, R.L., 533 McCoy, T.F., 304, 305, 306, 538, 543 McDonald, S.W., 662,665, 679 McGee, P.R., 679 McGhee, E., 584, 679 McGill, C., 892,901 McGuire, W.J., 335,342, 543 Mclntosh, I., 615, 679 Mclntosh, J.R., 678 Mclntyre, A., 49, 55 McKellar, M., 903 McKeon, D., 53, 150 McKinley, R.M., 28, 55, 611,635,661,677, 679, 681
McKoen, D., 224, 225 McLemore, J., 150 McLimans, R.K., 864 McMahon, B.E., 533 McNamara, L.B., 868, 886, 887, 893,894, 902 McQueen, H., 99 McQuillin, R., 60, 67, 78, 101 Mear, C.E., 810, 811,830, 862 Medlock, P.L., 865 Meinzer, O.E., 638, 679 Meissner, F.F., 794 Meister, J.J., 543 Meneveau, C., 426, 543 Menzie, D.E., 45, 46, 54, 902 Mesa, O.J., 372, 435, 543
Mesolella, K.J., 801, 811, 819, 840, 862 Metghalchi, M., 536 Meunier, D., 223,644, 645, 679 Meyer, L.J., 681 Mezzatesta, A., 166, 226, 227 Miall, A.D., 865 Middleton, M.F., 88, 101 Miller, A.E., 458,459, 461,543 Miller, B.D., 356,536 Miller, C.C., 679 Miller, D.N.Jr., 532 Miller, EG., 536, 677, 679, 680 Miller, F.H.,532 Miller, G.K., 226 Miller, J.A., 863 Miller, K.C., 97, 100, 542 Miller, M.G., 36, 55, 223 Miller, R.D., 102 Miller, R.T., 496, 543 Miller, T.E., 856 Miller, W.C., 228 Millheim, K.K., 41, 55, 679 Mimran, Y., 783, 794 Mink, R.M., 542 Misellati, A., 52 Miska, S.Z., 594, 680 Mitchell, ER., 227 Mitchum, R.M., Jr., 50, 55, 56, 103, 803, 862, 864
Mitkus, A.E, 149, 222 Miyata, Y., 102 Mohanty, K.K., 458, 459, 461,543 Mohanty, S., 405,543 Monicard, R.P., 108, 136, 151 Montiel, H.D., 680 Moody, J.D., 797, 832, 862 Mooney, L.W., 862 Moore, A.D., 389, 543 Moore, C.H., 858, 860, 861,867, 894, 902 Moore, C.V., 197, 199, 200, 224 Moore, D., 546 Moore, G.E, 93, 99 Moore, P., 99, 100, 102 Moore, P.J.R.McD., 902 Moore, W.D., 22, 55, 534 Moran, J.H., 213, 226 Morgan, L., 94, 101 Morineau, Y., 436, 543 Moring, J.D., 532 Morris, C.F., 182, 195,207, 214, 226 Morris, E.E., 258, 543 Morris, R.L., 205,208, 226 Morris, S.A., 152, 228 Morrow, N.R., 136, 151,200, 222, 875,879, 900, 901,902
Morse, J.W., 784, 794
971 Morse, R.A., 52, 56, 335,342, 543, 545 Mortada, M., 257, 544 Mosley, M.A., 863 Mruk, D.H., 857 Mudd, G.C., 100 Muegge, E.L., 150, 223 Mueller, O.M., 150, 224 Mueller, T.D., 585, 679 Muggeridge, A.H., 541 Muller, G., 769 Muller, J., 372, 407, 409, 412, 415,425,433, 539, 544
Muller, P., 799, 862 Mullins, J.E., 209, 226 Mundry, M., 51, 900 Mungan, N., 875, 902 Muravyov, I., 947, 948, 949 Murray, G.H., 713,716, 769 Murray, R.C., 868, 901 Muskat, M., 117, 151,201,226, 245,302,311, 544
Musmarra, J.A., 544 Mussman, W.J., 798, 862 Myers, M.T., 147, 191, 192, 226 Nabor, G.W., 257, 544, 679 Nadon, G.C, 810, 862 Nagel, R.G., 55 Nagy, R.M., 864 Najurieta, H.L., 634, 636, 679 Nakayama, K., 100, 1O1 Narayanan, K.R., 150, 539 Narr, W., 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 55 Natanson, S.G., 503,504, 534, 538, 751,753, 769
Nath, A.K., 222 Naylor, B., 537 Needham, R.B., 538, 543 Neidell, N.S.,lO1
Nelson, D.E., 901 Nelson, H.W., 858 Nelson, R.A., 784, 794 Neslage, F.J., 532 Nettle, R.L., 537 Neuse, S.H., 540 Newell, K.D., 810, 831,862 Nichol, L.R., 38, 53, 472,473,538 Nicoletis, S., 227 Niko, H., 150, 352, 353,354, 546 Nisle, R.G., 585,679 Niven, R.G., 542 Nodine-Zeller, D.E., 858 Nolan, J.B., 46, 55 Nolen-Hoeksema, R.C., 42, 55 Nooteboom, J.J., 226 Nordquist, J.W., 533
Norton, L.J., 5 7, 229 Nuckols, E.B., 231,298, 544 Nute, A.J., 900 Nydegger, G.L., 790, 791, 792, 794 Nygaard, E., 782, 794 Obradovich, J., 100 O'Brien, M., 53, 225 Odeh, A.S., 679 Ogbe, D.O., 632, 678 Ogg, J.G., 100 Oliver, F.L., 532 Oltz, D.E, 857 Onur, M., 658, 680 Ormiston, A.R., 862 Oros, M.O., 535 Orr, EM., 546, 902 Orsi, T.H., 457, 544 Ortiz de Maria, M.J., 538 Osborne, A.E, 538, 901 Osborne, W.E., 810, 831,863 Oshry, H.L., 229 Ostrowsky, N., 539, 542 Overbey, W.K., Jr., 8, 55 Owen, L.B., 139, 140, 151, 178, 226 Owens, W.W., 902 Pabst, W, 900 Pach, E, 812, 856 Paillet, EL., 208, 226 Palacas, J.G., 794 Palisade Corporation, 217, 226 Palmer, A.N., 797, 798, 799, 800, 856, 862 Palmer, M.V., 798, 800, 856, 862 Paola, C., 84, 101 Papatzacos, P., 672, 680 Pape, W.C., 55 Pariana, G.J., 56 Park, W.C., 696, 769 Parker, H.M., 893,902 Parra, J., 677 Parsley, A.J., 415, 544 Parsley, M.J., 812, 831,860 Parsons, R.L., 34, 53, 290, 436, 537, 888, 900 Parsons, R.W., 3, 55, 260, 501,544 Partain, B., 8, 55 Pascal, H., 644, 680 Pasini, J., III, 8, 55 Pasternack, I., 802, 862 Patel, R.S., 45, 55 Pathak, P., 457, 544 Paul, A., 223 Pautz, J.E, 312, 315, 535 Payne, D.A., 51,900 Payton, C.E., 52, 55, 56, 102, 103, 849, 862, 864 Pearce, L.A., 223
972 Peam, W.C., 538 Peeters, M., 166, 226 Peggs, J.K., 55 Peitgen, H-O., 546 Pelet, R., 85 7 Pellisier, J., 223 Pendexter, C., 802, 856, 885, 900 Penn, J.T., 152, 228 Ptrez, A.A.M., 681 Perez, G., 544 Ptrez Rosales, C., 39, 40, 55, 538, 634, 679, 680 Perkins, A., 532 Perlmutter, M., 99 Permian Basin Chapter of the AIME, 226 Perry, R.D., 297, 298, 544 Peters, D.C., 102 Peters, E.J., 874, 902 Peterson, R.B., 532, 793 Petrash, I.N., 56 Petricola, M.J.C., 53, 225 Pettitt, B.E., 28, 53 Petzet, G.A., 325,544 Phillips, C., 150, 224 Phillips, M., 534 Pickell, J.J., 481,544, 952 Pickering, K.T., 100 Pickett, G.R., 163, 164, 169, 180, 197, 208, 219, 226 Pierce, A.E., 677 Pinter, N., 84, 101 Pirard, Y.M., 222, 676 Pirson, S.J., 29, 55, 486, 544, 956 Pittman, D.J., 223 Plasek, R.E., 227, 229 Playford, P.E., 91, 94, 101 Plumb, R., 223 Plummer, L.N., 856 Pocovi, A.S., 331,544 Poggiagliolmi, E., 864 Poley, J.P., 192, 226 Pollard, P., 741,769 Pollastro, R.M., 790, 794 Pollock, C.B., 533 Polozkov, V., 949 PoroTechnologies, 147 Porter, J.W., 801,858 Posamentier, H.W., 56 Poston, S.W., 57, 326, 327, 329, 330, 544, 546 Poulson, T.D., 534 Poveda, G., 372, 435,543 Powers, R.W., 533 Pozzo, A., 544 Prade, H., 363, 53 7 Prats, M., 680 Pray, L.C., 254, 268, 536, 802, 805, 834, 845, 857
Price, H.S., 363, 368, 546, 810, 864, 894, 903 Price, J.G.W., 200, 226 Price, R.C., 861 Price, W.G., 541 Procaccia, I., 410, 423, 539 Prothero, D.R., 100 Pruit, J.D., 794 Pucci, J.C., 331, 544 Pugh, V.J., 146, 152, 481,484, 485, 541 Pullen, J.R., 800, 863 Purcell, W.R., 131,151, 201,226 Pyle, T.E., 856 Qi, F., 48, 55, 810, 832, 837, 840, 845,846, 862 Quanheng, Z., 48, 53, 806, 810, 825, 832, 837, 838, 845, 859, 863 Querol, R., 859 Quinn, T.M., 84, 100, 101 Quirein, J., 166, 227 Rabe, B.D., 99 Raeser, D.E, 787, 794 Rafavich, F., 67, 68, 101 Raffaldi, EJ., 152, 229, 546 Raghavan, R., 612, 638, 650, 672, 680, 681 Rhheim, A., 794 Raiga-Clemenceau, J., 172, 180, 227 Rainbow, H., 53 Raleigh, C.B., 535 Ramakrishnan, T.S., 221 Rainbow, EH.K., 209, 227 Ramey, H.J. Jr., 549, 553,563,565, 580, 585, 590, 595, 596, 597, 606, 611,632, 636, 656, 658, 659, 676, 677, 678, 680, 681 Ramey, H.J., Jr., 51,536 Randrianavony, M., 223 Rao, R.P., 840, 863 Raoofi, J., 534 Rapoport, L.A., 677 Rappold, K., 332, 333,534 Rasmus, J., 221 Rau, R.N., 192, 222, 227, 229 Ray, R.M., 279, 544 Raymer, L.L., 128, 150, 168, 172, 179, 180, 193, 224, 227 Raymond, D.E., 810, 831,863 Read, D.L., 863 Read, J.E, 83, 84, 99, 100, 101, 102, 798, 862 Read, P.A., 150 Reeckmann, A., 254, 544 Reed, C.L., 51,797, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861,862, 864, 865
Reese, D.E., 543 Reeside, J.B., 792, 793 r Rehbinder, N., 224 Reid, A.M., 810, 812, 818, 825,862, 863
973 Reid, S.A.T., 812, 825,863 Reijers, T.J.A., 545 Reinson, G.E., 801,864 Reiss, L.H., 702, 769, 880, 881,902 Reitzel, G.A., 42, 54, 256, 544 Reservoirs, Inc., 147, 148, 151, 164, 165, 184, 190, 202, 227 Reynolds, A.C., 658, 680, 681 Reytor, R.S., 260, 261,262, 488, 489, 541,954 Rice, D.D., 791, 794 Richardson, J.E., 162, 194, 227, 228 Richardson, J.G., 44, 53, 260, 501,502, 539, 542, 885, 894, 902 Rickards, L.M., 50, 55 Ricoy, U., 679 Rieke, H.H. III, 1, 8, 38, 52, 53, 54, 231,233, 240, 242, 258, 297, 298, 334, 466, 534, 536, 537, 539, 541,542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 677, 681, 861, 900 Ringen, J.K., 150 Rittenhouse, G., 48, 55, 806, 863 Rivera, R.J., 677
Roach, J.W., 212, 227 Robert M. Sneider Exploration, Inc., 147, 148, 151, 164, 165, 184, 190, 202, 227 Roberts, J.N., 267, 544 Roberts, T.G., 18, 20, 21, 23, 51 Robertshaw, E.S., 56 Robertson, J.O. Jr., 54, 542, 937 Robertson, J.W., 533 Robinson, D.B., 680 Robinson, E.S., 59, 101 Robinson, J.D., 862 Robinson, J.E., 363, 466, 544 Rockwood, S.H., 952 Rodriguez, A., 679 Rodriguez, E., 166, 226, 227 Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 540 Roehl, EO., 542, 793, 802, 803,804, 832, 833, 834, 845, 859, 860, 861,863 Roemer, P.B., 150, 152, 224, 229 Roger, W.L., 496, 543 Rohan, J.A., 150 Romero, R.M., 28, 52 Rong, G., 860 Root, P.J., 258, 546, 681,741, 769 Rosa, A.J., 659, 680 Roscoe, B.A., 227 Rose, ER., 813, 863 Rose, W.D., 131,151,177, 205,227,229, 389, 391,544, 547 Rosendahl, B.R., 97, 102 Rosman, A., 470, 544 Ross, C.A., 56 Ross, W.C., 101 Rossi, D.J., 224
Rothwell, W.P., 203,228 Rough, R.L., 8, 55 Roulet, C., 221 Rowly, D.S., 141,151 Ruessink, B.H., 141,151, 167, 227 Ruhland, R., 701,702, 703,712, 769 Ruppel, S.C., 103, 540, 811,859 Russ, J.C., 370, 544 Russell, D.G., 39, 55, 203, 210, 226, 549, 584, 679, 680
Rust, D.H., 169, 223 Ruzyla, K., 264, 545 Sabet, M.A., 549, 580, 645, 680 Sabins, ES., 8, 56 Sadiq, S., 473,545 Safinya, K.A., 207, 214, 227 Sahuquet, B.C., 46, 56 Salathiel, R.A., 875,902 Saller, A.H., 800, 811,830, 863 Salt, H.J., 435,539 Samaniego, V.F., 203, 210, 223,282, 317, 536, 537, 545, 550, 559, 563,575, 596, 598, 603,638,639, 656, 677, 679, 680 Sandberg, G.W., 533 Sander, N.J., 533 Sanders, J.E., 775, 783, 793 Sanders, L.J., 677 Sando, W.J., 798, 863 Sangree, J.B., 902 Sangster, D.E, 797, 863 Santiago-Acevedo, J., 813,830, 840, 863 Santoro, G., 53, 858 Sanyal, S.K., 152, 229 Saraf, D.N., 456, 545 Sarem, A.M.S., 285, 286, 538 Sarg, J.E, 50, 56, 82, 99, 101,861 Sass-Gustkiewicz, M., 797, 858 Saucier, A., 389, 401,403,405,415,421,422, 423,424, 425,427, 428, 430, 431,432, 545
Saunders, M.R., 151 Saupe, D., 546 Savit, C.H., 69, 70, 99 Savre, W.C., 227 Sawatsky, L.H., 177, 224 Sawyer, G.H., 54 Scala, C., 223,545 Scaturo, D.M., 59, 82, 83, 99, 101 Schafer-Perini, A.L., 594, 680 Schatz, EL., 532 Schatzinger, R.A., 540, 782, 783, 793, 794 Schechter, D.S., 881,902 Scheibal, J.R., 199, 227 Schepel, K.J., 215, 216, 225 Schilthius, R.J., 302, 545
974 Schipper, B.A., 150 Schlager, W., 77, 100, 280, 281,545 Schlanger, S.O., 49, 56, 773, 794 Schlee, J.S., 102 Schlottman, B.W., 545 Schlumberger, 158, 213,227 Schlumberger Educational Services, 169, 172, 175, 180, 181,182, 189, 197, 198, 199, 201,205,207, 214, 221,227 Schlumberger Limited, 207, 214, 227 Schlumberger, M., 227 Schmidt, A.W., 222 Schmidt, M.G., 222, 224 Schneider, EN., 545 Schneidermann, N., 793 Schnoefelen, D.J., 302, 534 Scholle, P.A., 49, 50, 56, 81,102, 139, 151, 782, 783, 790, 793, 794, 858, 860, 861
Schott, E.H., 696, 769 Schreiber, J.E, 810, 859 Schuffert, J.D., 864 Schwartz, L., 221 Schweitzer, J., 54 Schweller, W.J., 535 Schweltzer, J., 225 Scorer, D.T., 680 Scott, A.J., 811,840, 859 Scott, D.L., 97, 102 Scott, H.D., 53, 150, 173,225,227 Scott, J.O., 681, 813,864 Screenivasan, K.R., 426, 543 Scriven, L.E., 544 Seeburger, D.A., 222 Seeman, B., 53, 223,225 Seevers, D.O., 134, 151,203, 228 Seidel, F.A., 545
Sen, P.N., 394, 545 Sengbush, R.L., 60, 102 Senger, R.K., 436, 438, 439, 440, 443,444, 446, 449, 451,452, 454, 456, 545, 891,900, 902
Serra, J., 370, 545 Serra, K.V., 640, 681 Serra, O., 150, 208, 211,212, 213,224, 228 Sessions, R.E., 245,532, 545 Shalimov, B.V., 44, 51 Shanmugan, G.S., 103 Shannon, M.T., 228 Sharma, B., 540 Sharma, M.M., 405,543 Sharma, P., 60, 102 Shaw, B.B., 50, 53 Sheikholeslami, B.A., 329, 545 Shell Development Company, 147 Shepler, J.C., 302, 536 Sheriff, R.E., 60, 71, 72, 94, 102
Sherman, C.W., 535 Sherrad, D.W., 542 Shirer, J.A., 901 Shirley, K., 330, 545, 810, 863 Shouldice, J.R., 858 Shouyue, Z., 863 Shraiman, B.I., 539 Sibbit, A., 166, 223,226 Siemens, W.T., 306, 545 Sieverding, J.L., 812, 859, 863 Sikora, V.J., 335, 342, 543 Simandoux, P., 543 Simmons, G., 150, 224 Simmons, J.F., 581,582, 644, 645, 678, 681 Simon, R., 470, 544 Simone, L., 78, 102 Singer, J., 227 Sinnokrot, A., 536, 954, 956 Skinner, D.R., 937 Skjeltorp, A.T., 413,414, 539 Skopec, R.A., 136, 151,205, 206, 213, 228 Skov, A.M., 8, 28, 44, 53, 486 Skovbro, B., 415,545 Slider, H.C., 626, 681 Slingerland, R.L., 84, 102 Slobod, R.L., 457, 545 Slotboom, R.A., 897, 900 Slov, A.M., 487, 537 Smaardyk, J., 226 Smagala, T.M., 790, 791,794 Smart, P.L., 798, 800, 858, 863, 865 Smith, A.E., 51,534 Smith, D.G., 131,151, 183,212, 228, 800, 863 Smith, G.L., 862 Smits, J-W., 223 Smits, R.M.M., 150 Sneider, R.M., 141,146, 147, 152, 902 Snelson, S., 101 Snow, D.T., 769 Snowdon, D.M., 505, 507, 508, 536 Snyder, R.H., 151, 787, 794 Soc. of Professional Well Log Analysts, 110, 152, 208, 210, 221,228 Soewito, F., 102 Sorenson, R.P., 545 Soudet, H., 53, 858 Southham, J., 535 Spain, D.R., 138, 152, 158, 228 Spang, J., 52, 793 Spencer, R.J., 83, 99, 102 Spicer, P.J., 151 Spirak, J., 862 Spivak, A., 535 Spronz, W.D., 536 Srivastava, R.M., 893, 902 Stahl, E.J., 28, 51
975 Stalkup, F.I., 222, 882, 902 Standing, M.B., 235,545, 588, 589, 593,681 Stanislav, J.F., 549, 580, 656, 681 Stanley, H.E., 539, 542 Stanley, T.L., 533 Stapp, W.L., 326, 545, 787, 794 Staron, P., 224 Steams, D.W., 694, 695, 769 Steel, R., 100 Steeples, D.W., 102 Stegemeier, G.L., 542 Stehfest, H., 644, 681 Stein, M.H., 44, 56 Steineke, M., 533 Stell, J.R., 542 Stellingwerff, J., 225 Stevenson, D.L., 811, 831,865 Stewart, C.R., 21, 22, 56, 475, 477, 479, 480, 486, 488, 545 Stewart, G., 679 Stiehler, R.D., 532 Stiles, J.H. Jr., 901 Stiles, L.H., 33, 34, 53, 302, 534, 882, 902 Stiles, W.E., 33, 34, 35, 37, 56 Stockden, I., 151 Stoessell, R.K., 799, 864 Stoller, C., 227 Storer, D., 55 Stormont, D.H., 811,864 Stosser, S.M., 296, 539 Stoudt, D.L., 99, 100 Straley, C., 151,225,226 Straus, A.J.D., 5 7, 229 Streltsova, T.D., 681 Strickland, R., 228 Strickler, W.R., 680 Strobel, C.J., 681 Strobel, J.S., 83,100, 101,102 Strobl, R., 364, 369, 370, 371,547 Strubhar, M., 586, 681 Stubbs, B.A., 335,338, 339, 340, 341,343,344, 535
Suinouchi, H., 102 Sullivan, R.B., 534 Sutton, E., 533 Swanson, B.F., 131,152, 201,228, 544, 952 Swanson, R.G., 128, 152, 167, 178, 228 Sweeney, S.A., 188, 228, 480, 541 Sylvester, R.E., 98 Syrstad, S.O., 151 Syvitski, J.P.M., 102 Szpakiewicz, M.J., 540 Taggart, I.J., 539 Taijun, Z., 860 Taikington, G.E., 532
Taira, A., 101 Taisheng, G., 860 Takamura, K., 900 Takao, I., 84, 102 Talukdar, S.N., 813, 840, 863 Tang, Jie, 83, 102 Tanguy, D.R., 228 Tanner, C.S., 160, 228 Tappmeyer, D.M., 813, 856 Tariq, S.M., 679 Tarr, C.M., 27, 32, 56 Tatashev, K.K., 44, 56 Taylor, G.L., 53 Taylor, M.R., 151 Tek, M.R., 679 Telford, W.M., 59, 102 Teodorovich, G.I., 268, 400, 545 Tetzlaff, D.M., 84, 102, 227 Tew, B.H., 542 Theis, C.V., 584, 681 Theys, P., 223 Thomas, D.C., 146, 152 Thomas, E.C., 118, 125, 146, 147, 152, 159, 177,220,228 Thomas, G.E., 868, 902 Thomas, G.W., 593,681 Thomas J.B., 532 Thomas, O.D., 776, 778, 779, 780, 781, 783, 795
Thomas, R.D., 150 Thomas, R.L., 539 Thomasson, M.R., 96, 102 Thomeer, J.H.M., 106, 131,152, 155, 183, 201, 228 Thompson, A.H., 267, 270, 271,415, 541 Thompson, B.B., 534 Thompson, S., 55, 103, 864 Thorsfield, W., 101 Thrailkill, J., 797, 844, 864 Thrasher, R., 538 Thrasher, T.S., 538 Tiab, D., 563,681 Tillman, R.W., 541 Timmons, J.P., 226 Timur, A., 181,205, 228, 390, 466, 545 Tiner, R.L., 545 Tinsley, J.M., 335,342, 545 Tittman, J., 158, 179, 228 Tixier, M.P., 197, 208, 228 Todd, T.P., 101 Tomanic, J.P., 546 Tomutsa, L., 462, 468, 540, 545 Torabzadeh, J., 536 Torres, D., 207, 214, 228 Torrey, P.D., 244, 246, 249, 296, 545, 546 Tortike, W.S., 535
976 Touchard, G., 546 Tracy, G.W., 258, 543 Tran, T.T.B., 534, 899 Traugott, M.O., 186, 190, 209, 228 Travis, B.J., 535 Treiber, L.E., 902 Tremblay, A.-M.S., 423, 546 Tremblay, R.R., 546 Trocan, V.N., 45, 56 Troschinetz, J., 811,830, 832, 864 Trouiller, J-C., 223 Trube, A.S.Jr., 532 Truby, L.G., Jr., 22, 55 Truitt, N.E., 680 Tsang, P.B., 882, 883,900 Tsarevich, K.A., 681 Tschopp, R.H., 813, 864 Tumer, K., 190, 228 Turcotte, D.L., 83, 98, 102, 103,264, 273, 401, 407, 546 Tutunjian, P.N., 134, 135, 150, 152, 184, 197, 200, 224, 226, 228, 229, 546 Twombley, B.N., 100, 813,864 Tyler, N., 276, 277, 280, 538, 546 Tyskin, R.A., 807, 832, 864 Uliana, M.A., 803,862 Ulmishek, G., 234, 546 Underschultz, J.R., 888, 900 Vadgana, U.N., 681 Vague, J.R., 532 Vail, ER., 50, 55, 56, 82, 100, 103, 800, 802, 805,864 Van Akkeren, T.J., 28, 52, 209, 223 Van de Graaf, W.J.E., 893,902 Van den Bark, E., 776, 778, 779, 780, 781,783, 795
Van Den Berg, J., 535 van der Hijden, J., 223 van der Poel, C., 900 Van Der Vlis, A.C., 320, 321,546 Van Driel, J.J., 856 Van Everdingen, A.E, 41, 51, 56, 534, 553,587, 644, 681
Van Golf-Racht, T.D., 580, 581,677, 681, 710, 769
Van Horn, D., 863 Van Kruyskijk, C.EJ.W., 352, 353, 354, 546 van Meurs, E, 900 Van Ness, J.W., 365, 366, 543 van Poollen, H.K., 64 l, 644, 678 Van Schijndel-Goester, F.S., 795 van Straaten, J.U., 536 Van Wagoner, J.C., 56 Vandenberghe, N., 849, 85 l, 852, 855,864
Vander Stoep, G.W., 535 Vargo, G.A., 100 Vasilechko, V.E, 45, 56 Vela, S., 55, 297, 534, 635, 679, 681 Velde, B., 433,546 Vennard, J.K., 940, 941,949 Ventre, J., 225 Vernon, ED., 799, 864 Verseput, T.S., 864 Vest, E.L., 82 l, 825, 831,840, 864 Vest, H.A., 860 Videtich, EE., 813,864 Vienot, M.E., 649, 678 Villegas, M., 227 Vinegar, H.J., 134, 135, 136, 137, 150, 152, 168, 178, 179, 184, 200, 203,224, 226, 228, 229, 456, 457,458, 462, 466, 546 Viniegra, O.E, 813, 820, 830, 832, 847, 864 Visser, R., 166, 226 Viturat, D., 677 Vizy, B., 797, 857 Voelker, J.J., 538 Von Gonten, W.D., 335, 342, 543 von Rosenberg, D.U., 538 Vorabutr, P., 937 Voss, R.F., 365,366, 367, 546 Vrbik, J., 681 Vysotskiy, I.V., 807, 864 Waddell, R.T., 810, 864 Waggoner, J.M., 901 Waggoner, J.R., 901 Wagner, O.R., 52 Walker, J.W., 54 Walker, K.R., 103 Walker, R.D., 56 Walker, T., 208, 221 Wall, C.G., 106, 108, 149 Waller, H.N., 677 Wallis, J.R., 366, 372, 543 Walper, J.L., 53 Walter, L.M., 99, 101 Walters, R.E, 810, 815, 825, 831,864 Waltham, D., 83, 99 Wang, J.S.Y., 56 Wang, S.Y., 136, 137, 152 Ward, R.F., 33, 56, 79, 103 Ward, W.C., 864 Wardlaw, N.C., 801,864, 868, 872, 873,874, 876, 877, 878, 880, 886, 887, 893,894, 901,902, 903
Warembourg, P.A., 534 Warme, J.E., 793 Warren, J.E., 258, 363, 368, 546, 681,741, 769, 894, 903 Washburn, E.W., 184, 229
977 Wasson, J.A., 56, 533, 681 Waters, K.H., 59, 103 Watfa, M., 223 Watkins, J.W., 51 Watney, W.L, 83, 99, 862 Watson, H.J., 830, 832, 837, 840, 865 Watson, H.K.S., 864 Wattenbarger, R., 294, 295,546, 595, 681 Watts, D.E., 101 Watts, G., 864 Watts, N.L., 782, 784, 795 Watts, R.J., 44, 56 Wayhan, D.A., 360, 361,362, 533, 546, 811, 814, 830, 862 Weber, K.J., 1, 8, 25, 56, 436, 537, 541,546, 883, 884, 885, 892, 903 Weeks, W.C., 536 Wegner, R.E., 378, 543 Weidie, A.E., 856 Weiland, J.L., 227 Welex, 207, 214, 229 Wellington, S.L., 135, 136, 152, 168, 178, 184, 229, 456, 457, 458, 462,546 Wells, L.E., 128, 152, 168, 179, 193,222,229 Welton, J.E., 140, 152 Wendel, F., 227 Wendte, J.C., 101 Wesson, T.C., 57, 539, 899, 901,902 West, L.W., 883,903 West Texas Geological Society, 532 Westaway, E, 195,229 Westermann, G.E.G., 100 Wharton, R.E, 192, 229 Whately, M.K.G., 100 Wheeler, D.M., 857 Whitaker, F.F., 798, 800, 863 White, D.A., 233,546 White, F.W., 545 White, R.J., 533 Whiting, L.L., 811, 831,865 Whittaker, A., 108, 109, 120, 122, 123, 126, 127, 152
Whittle, G.L., 59 Whittle, T.M., 222, 676 Widess, M.B., 103 Wigley, EL., 48, 56, 799, 800, 845, 857, 865 Wilde, G., 862 Wilgus, C.K., 56, 101 Wilkinson, D., 221 Willemann, R.J., 83, 103 Willemsen, J.F., 151,225 Williams, J.R.Jr., 545 Williams, J.W., 901 Williams, K.W., 223 Williams, M.R., 228 Williams, P.W., 797,798, 799, 800, 801,806,
834, 835, 841,842, 858 Williams, R., 221 Willingham, R.W., 32, 45, 56, 533 Willis, D.G., 39, 54 Willmon, G.J., 44, 56, 533 Willmon, J.H., 615,679 Wilshart, J.W., 256, 259, 496, 497, 541,867, 901 Wilson, D.C., 678 Wilson, J.L., 99, 101, 807, 810, 812, 837, 865 Winham, H.E, 533 Winkler, K., 223 Winterer, E.L., 793 Wishart, J.W., 255, 256 Witherspoon, P.A., 4, 56, 585, 679 Withjack, E.M., 136, 137, 152, 457, 458, 546 Withrow, P.C., 814, 831,865 Witterholt, E.J., 158, 215,225 Wittick, T.R., 222 Wittmann, M.J., 679 Wolf, K.H., 25, 56, 536 Wong, P-Z., 390, 394, 395,397, 398, 546 Wood, G.V., 860 Wood, L., 70, 103 Woodland, A.W., 52 Woodward, J., 794 Woolverton, D.G., 60, 99, 856, 857, 862 Wooten, S.O., 54 Works, A.M., 538 World Oil Coring Series, 108, 110, 111, 112, 113, 116, 123, 124, 152, 158, 182, 183, 229 Worrell, J.M., 199, 227 Wortel, R., 84, 99 Worthington, M.H., 158, 215,229 Worthington, P.F., 1, 2, 5 7, 294, 295,546 Wraight, P.D., 53, 221,225 Wright, M.S., 52 Wright, V.P., 280, 546, 797, 799, 845, 847, 858, 863, 865
Wu, C.H., 42, 43, 57, 302, 310, 542, 546, 547 Wunderlich, R.W., 137, 145, 146, 152 Wurl, T.M., 376, 378, 537 Wyatt, Jr., D.F., 195,225,229 Wyllie, M.R.J., 172, 180, 205,229, 391,547 Wyman, R.E., 138, 153, 227 Xie-Pei, W., 48, 55, 810, 832, 837, 840, 845, 846, 862 Xueping, Z., 860 Yamaura, T., 102 Yang, C-T., 542 Yang, D., 903 Yapaudijan, L., 858 Yen, T.E, 877, 900 Yortsos, u 432, 433,534, 535
978 Youmans, A.H., 192, 193,229 Young, G.R., 436, 547 Young, J.W., 541 Young, M.N., 44, 5 7 Youngblood, W.E., 199, 200, 229 Yuan, H.H., 132, 139, 153 Yuan, L-P., 364, 369, 370, 371,547 Yuster, S.T., 38, 57, 296, 547 Zana, E.T., 593,681
Zemanek, J., 28, 5 7, 207, 214, 229 Zheltov, Y.P., 769 Zhenrong, D., 860 Zhigan, Z., 807, 865 Zhou, D., 902 Ziegler, P.A., 782, 795 Zimmerman, L.J., 28, 5 7 Zogg, W.D., 811, 831,863 Zotl, J., 797, 865 Zwanziger, J.E., 326, 547
979
S U B J E C T INDEX*
Abkatun field (Middle East), 635 Abo Formation, 481,483,484 Abqaiq field (Saudi Arabia), 332,528 Abu Dhabi, 95, 96, 332, 333 Acheson field (Canada), 523 Acheson-Homeglen-Rimbey trend (Canada), 237, 238,247 Acid stimulation, 1 , acidizing technology, 27 Acoustic logs, 17, 17, 28, 59, 65 , waveforms, 56, 64 Acoustic tomography, 158 Adair field (Texas), 43 Adell field (Kansas), 519 Adell Northwest field (Kansas), 528 Aden Consolidated and Aden South fields (Illinois), 528 Advanced fracture treatments, 337 Africa, 91, 94 Aggradation, 59, 60 Agha Jari field (Iran), 799 Airborne radar imagery, 8 Alabama 325, 810 Alberta Basin (Canada), 801 Albion-Scipio-Pulaski trend (Michigan), 49, 810, 827, 828, 830, 837, 849 Albuskjell field (North Sea), 415, 781 Alden Northeast field (Oklahoma), 811 Algal-plate buildups, 74 Alison Northwest field (New Mexico), 531 Allen field (Texas), 24 Amposta Marino field (Spain), 48,799, 800, 813, 830, 844, 845, 851,853 Amrow field (Texas), 523 Anadarko Basin (USA), 49, 810, 811,814, 822, 827, 831,832 Aneth field (Utah), 520 Anhydrite, 145, 165, 169, 173, 259, 304, 309, 361,383,466 Anisotropy (reservoir), 3, 8, 9, 231 Anton-Irish field (Texas), 519 APEX models, 132
*Prepared by S.J. Mazzullo and C.S. Teal.
API gravity (oil), 240-242, 246, 249 Appalachian Basin (USA), 242 Arab-D Formation, 265,266, 332 Arbuckle (limestone, dolomite, formation, group), 247, 814, 815, 827 Archie's factor, equation, law, 10, 34, 67133, 147, 163,164, 168, 178, 184, 186-189, 196,217, 219, 267 Archie parameters, 190 Archie reservoir classes, 291 Archie rock types, classification, 481,482,484 Argentina, 326, 331,803 Arkansas, 20, 23, 24, 247, 253, 346, 481,482, 519, 522, 523 Arkoma Basin (USA), 810 Artesian flow, 22 Artificial lift, 17 Arun Limestone, 272, 418--422 Ashburn field (Kansas), 24, 523 Ash Grove field (Kansas), 525 Asmari Limestone, reservoir, field (Iran), 23,235, 502, 799 Atlanta field (Arkansas), 24 Atolls, 76, 91, 94, 95, 292 Austin Chalk, 44, 45, 56, 59, 81,208, 2!0, 278, 325-331, 481,784-791 Australia, 94, 851,854 Austria, 812, 820, 824 Austrian Chalk, 265 Authigenic clay, 256 Axeman Formation, 12 A4 Formation, 45 Bab field (Abu Dhabi), 333 Bahamas, 83-85 Bahrain, 528 Bahrain field (Bahrain), 528 Band method, 35 Bangestan Limestone, 235 Bannatyne field (Montana), 523 Bantam field (Nebraska), 525 Banyak Shelf, 93 Barada field (Nebraska), 525 Bar Mar field (Texas), 520 Basin and Range (USA), 811, 831
980 Bateman Ranch field (Texas), 520, 523 Bear's Den field (Montana), 531 Beaver Creek field (Wyoming), 522 Beaverhill Lake Formation, sub-group, 239,490, 493,494, 496 Beaver River field (Canada), 504-509 Bedford Limestone, field (Texas), 24, 265,266 Belle River Hills field (Canada), 811,830 Berea Sandstone, 133 Bemouli equation, 7 Berri field (Middle East), 332 Besa River Formation, 508 Big Creek field (Arkansas), 24 Big Eddy field (New Mexico), 520 Big Horn Basin (USA), 301,355, 811 Big Spring field (Texas), 521 Big Wall field (Montana), 525 Bimini Bank, 83, 84 Bindley field (Kansas), 811,830 Bioherms, biostromes, 23 Bitter Lake South and West fields (New Mexico), 521 Blackfoot field (Montana), 530 Black Leaf field (Montana), 525 Black oil, 235 Black Warrior Basin (USA), 810, 831 Blanket (infill) development, 307-310 Block 31 field (Texas), 24, 278, 519 Block 56 field (Texas), 829 Bloomer field (Kansas), 815 BOAST model, 322 Bohay Bay Basin (India), 810 Bois D'Arc-Hunton, 21,45 Bombay High field (India), 813 Bond shrinkage, 395 Bonnie Glen field(s)(Canada), 237,238,523,897 Boquillas Formation, 326 Borehole televiewer logs, 58, 64, 65 Bough Devonian field (New Mexico), 523 Boyle's Law, 119, 120, 123,266 Brahaney Northwest field (Texas), 830 Breakthrough, 883 -, of water, 350, 490, 494 Bredette field (Montana), 525 Bredette North field (Montana), 525 Breedlove field (Texas), 523 Bresse Basin (France), 812, 848 Bronco field (Texas), 523 Brown-Bassett field (Texas), 527 Brown Dolomite, 29, 36, 37, 325 Brown field (Texas), 521,525 Bubble point, 18, 44, 235, 242, 244, 356, 510, 514 Buckner field (Arkansas), 24, 248, 522 Buckwheat field (Texas), 830 Buda Limestone, 44, 325
BuHasa Formation, field (Middle East), 48, 74, 80, 813, 825 Buried hill traps (see Karst) Burro-Picachos Platform (Mexico), 326 Bush Lake field (Montana), 291 Bypassing, 27 -, bypassed oil, 287, 289, 456, 488, 873-877, 897 Cabin Creek field (Williston Basin), 525,804 Cactus field (New Mexico), 840 Cairo North field (Kansas), 521 California, 20 Caliper logs, 53 Cambrian, 814 Campeche-Reforma trend (Mexico), 48, 813, 820, 830, 840 Camp Springs field (Texas), 521 Canada, 38, 44, 74, 78, 237, 239, 240, 242,247, 250, 252,254, 326, 461-465,472,489, 490, 492,496--498, 501,504-507, 519,520,523, 524, 529, 531,801,805,812,818, 822, 867, 868, 890, 895,897 Canning Basin (Australia), 94 Capillary end effect, 486 Capillary pressure curves, 31, 33, 51, 62 Capillary pressure, forces, 1,131,132, 144, 145, 183,939-949 Carbonate play types , buildups, organic buildups, reefs, 59, 60, 74, 76-78, 82, 89, 91, 95 , clinoform, shelf margin, 59, 60, 79, 80, 82, 86-97 , sheets, sand sheets, sand shoals, 59, 60, 72-75, 82, 91, 95 Carlile Shale, 791 Carson Creek field (Canada), 239, 240 Carson Creek North field (Canada), 239, 240 Carter Creek field (Wyoming), 812, 820 Cary field (Mississippi), 525 Casablanca field (Spain), 812, 830, 832, 840 Catch-up sedimentation, 59, 76-78, 82 Cato field (New Mexico), 258 Caves, caverns (paleocaves, paleocavems), 47 (see Karst ) -, cave-filling breccias, 47 (see Karst) Central Basin Platform (Texas-New Mexico), 33, 300, 310, 338, 811,812 Central Kansas Uplift (Kansas), 810-812, 815, 830, 831 Chalk, chalky reservoirs, 49, 59, 81, 86, 292, 415, 416, 508, 773-793 -, burial diagenesis, 782, 789 -, effective porosity and permeability, 783 -, facies, 782 , autochthonous, 782
981 , allochthonous, 782 -, fractures, 783, 788, 791 -, horizontal drilling, 785-787, 791,792 -, North American versus European chalks, 784792 -, overpressured fluids, 783 -, permeability, 783,788 -, primary versus secondary porosity, 772, 783, 788 -, source rocks, 792 -, stimulation, 791 Chalk Group, 777 Channeling, 2, 42,259,468 -, channel porosity, 468 Chaos theory, 400 Chase Group, 302, 306 Chase-Silica field (Kansas), 831 Chaveroo field (New Mexico), 258, 521 Chazy Group, 816 Chert, 20, 21, 96, 169, 173,759, 779 Chihuido de la Sierra Negra field (Mexico), 331, 332 China, 48, 785, 806, 810, 820, 823, 825, 837, 840, 845, 846 Cincinnati Arch (USA), 810,827 Circular drawdown, 8 Clear Fork Formation, 18, 33, 42, 43, 165, 303 Coccoliths, coccospheres, 49, 773-776, 790 Cogdell field (Texas), 821 Coldwater field (Michigan), 522 Colmer-Plymouth field (Illinois), 811, 831 Colorado, 527,790 Comiskey field (Kansas), 24, 523 Comiskey North-East field (Kansas), 523 Compaction, 4, 49, 50, 83,256, 272 Compartmentalization (see Reservoir) Compressibility (oil),9 Computer -, forward modeling, 50, 83 -, modeling, 1, 8, 17, 329, 492, 508, 884 -, simulations, 59, 82, 84, 85,489 Collapse breccias, 96 Confocal microscope, 26 Coning, 296, 332, 490-493,507, 508, 738-740, 885 Contact angle, 725, 873,939, 943,944 Controls on carbonate productivity, 85 Cores, coring -, analysis, 3, 4, 13, 31, 48, 49, 54, 60, 62, 105, 106, 116, 158, 159 -, bottomhole cores, 109 -, capillary pressure testing, 129 -, containerized whole coring, 111 -, core fluids, 108 -, core gamma scans, 116, 133 -, CT scans, 116, 118, 128, 135, 136'~ 142
-, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,
electrical resistivity, 116 geochemical analysis, 116 handling, preservation, 108, 115 horizontal wells, 54 NMR scans, 116, 118, 128, 129, 134, 135 oriented cores, 110, 213 percussion sidewall cores, 115 photos, 129, 130 pressure coring, 112 resistivity, 133 sidewall cores, 105, 107, 111, 114, 116, 165, 199 -, slimhole cores, 138 -, sponge whole coring, 113, 183 -, stress analysis, 129 -, whole coring, cores, 105, 107, 108, 110, 115 Coming field (Missouri), 523 Corrigan East field (Texas), 830 Cotton Valley Limestone, Group, 346-348, 351 Cottonwood Creek field, unit (Wyoming), 32, 45, 355, 357, 521,810 Coulommes-Vaucourtois field (France), 10 Council Grove Group, 302, 206 Coyanosa field (Texas), 527 CO 2 -, displacement, 11,457 -, injection, 44, 380 -, production rates, 379 -, saturation, 162, 195 C-Pool (Swan Hills North field, Canada), 240 Craig-Stiles method (performance), 35-37 Cretaceous, 38, 40, 44, 46, 48, 49, 72, 80, 81, 86, 95, 208, 240, 301,325, 331-333,415, 468, 481,498,499, 596, 599, 615, 621,773, 775,778,779,784, 789, 803,814, 820, 825, 832, 837 Cretaceous chalk, 773,775 Cretaceous limestones (Louisiana and Mississippi, 56 Cristobalite, 775 Critical oil saturation, 31 Crittendon field (Texas), 830 Crosset South-E1 Cinco fields (Texas), 530 Crossfield field, 812 Cross-flow, 37, 384 Crossroads South field (New Mexico), 525 CT scans, 15, 27, 32, 168, 178, 179, 184, 456462 Cuttings samples, 165, 167, 178, 200, 329, 482 Cyclicity in carbonates, 59, 73, 74, 78, 84, 300, 306, 308, 439 Cyclic oil, 45 Cyclic steam stimulation, 45 DAK (dolomite-anhydrite-potassium) model, 165 Dale Consolidated field (Illinois), 528,530
982 Daly field (Williston Basin), 812 Damme field (Kansas), 522, 528 Davis field (Kansas), 521 Davis Ranch field (Kansas), 525 Dawson field (Nebraska), 525 Dean-Stark extraction, apparatus, 126, 127, 134, 137 Dean-Wolfcamp pay (Texas), 258 Debris flow deposits, 87, 89 Decline curve analysis, 42,293,326 Deer Creek field (Montana), 525 Deerhead field (Kansas), 530 Delaware Basin (USA), 310,338 Delphia field (Montana), 523 Density logs, 16, 17, 27, 47 -, spectral, 16, 27 Denver Basin (USA), 776-778 Depletion, rate, 490, 492,496, 498 Depositional sequences, 82 Devil's Basin field (Montana), 521 Devonian, 21, 44, 45, 74, 78, 79, 94, 239, 240, 490, 497,498, 501,505,506, 508, 801,805, 814, 827, 867, 869, 882, 896 Diamond-M field (Texas), 821 Diamond-M/Jack field (Texas), 43 Diamond-M/McLaughlin field (Texas), 43 Dielectric logs, 41 Differential entrapment, 236, 239, 240 Digital production, 1 Diplogs/dipmeters, 56, 62, 65 Dispersivity (permeability), 367 Dollarhide East field (Texas), 525 Dollarhide field (Texas), 799, 800, 811,830 Dolomites, radioactive, 18 Dorado field (Spain), 830 Dorcheat field (Arkansas), 522 Dorward field (Texas), 303,304 Douthit unit, 305 Drawdown, analysis, 8, 583, 584 -, curve matching, 649 Drill stem tests, 4, 45 Drilling well, formation evaluation, 5 Drive mechanisms (reservoir), 243-254, 276 , combination drives, 250-253,528 , external gas drive, 475 gas-cap expansion, 243,246, 485, 502,510, 512, 513, 527, 867, 869 - - , gravity drainage, drive, 243,249, 254, 489, 494,497,498,500,502, 510, 511, 515,867, 869, 885, 898 solution-gas, 17, 20, 27,243,244, 340, 361, 383,470,475,477,478,485,488,502,510516, 518, 867, 869 , undersaturated oil expansion, 502 , water drive, encroachment, 243, 247, 311, 340, 489, 522, 867, 869 ,
,
, bottom water, 490, 496, 510, 511, 514, 515 DST data, analysis of, 105, 158, 165 Dubai (UAE), 80 Dune field (Texas), 32, 33, 278, 299, 307-309, 338, 339, 342, 344, 443,449, 452 Dupo field (Illinois), 525 Dwyer field (Montana), 530 Dykstra-Parsons coefficient, 290--292 D-I, D-2, D-3 zones (Devonian, Canada), 240, 242, 252 Eagle Ford Formation, 326 Eagle Springs field (Nevada), 526 East Texas field (Texas), 248 ECLIPSE (reservoir simulation program), 449 Edda field (North Sea), 781 Edinburg West field (Illinois), 811, 831 Edwards Group, 468 Egypt, 468 Ekofisk Formation, field (North Sea), 49, 50, 415, 778, 779, 781 E1Abra Limestone, 820 Eldfisk field (North Sea), 415, 781,783 Electrical array imaging logs, 56, 63, 64, 65 Electrical conductivity, 164, 186 Electrofacies, 211 Electromagnetic tomography, 158, 215 Elk Basin field (Wyoming), 359, 362, 52 l, 525, 811,830 Elkhorn field (Texas), 24 Ellenburger Dolomite, fields (Texas, New Mexico), 22-24, 56, 59,208, 210, 818, 827-830,838, 848 Embar field (Texas), 24 Emma field (Texas), 848 Enlow field (Kansas), 529 Eocene, 468, 469 Epeiric seas, basins, 76, 95 Error propagation, in formation evaluation, 67 Ervay Member (Phosphoria Formation), 355 Etosha Basin, 94 Eubank field (Kansas), 519, 527 Europe, 49, 775,776, 787, 792, 793, 853 Eustasy, eustatic curves, 82-85, 73, 76, 77 Evaporites, 72, 74, 77, 79, 80, 276, 505, 786, 800, 885 Evaporitic drawdown, 800 Excelsior D-2 (reef) pool, field (Canada), 250, 496, 497 Expert systems, 167 -, for formation evaluation, 13 Extension drilling, 298 Fahud field (Middle East), 48,, 813,825 Fairplay field (Kansas), 526
983 Fairview field, 810 Fairway field (Black Warrior Basin), 278,520 Fallon field (Texas), 346, 348, 351 Falls City field (Nebraska), 526 Fanglomerates, 97 Fanska field (Kansas), 530 Fateh field (Dubai, Middle East), 48, 80, 813,825, 830 Faults, 25 -, sealing, non-sealing, 25 Feeley field (Kansas), 528 F enn-B ig Valley field (Canada), 461-465 Fertile Prairie field (Montana), 530 Field A (Mediterranean Basin), 22, 813 Field development, 105, 231 Findlay Arch (USA), 810, 827 Fingering, 459 Fishook field (Illinois), 527 Flanagan field (Texas), 43 Floods, flooding -, alkaline, 275 -, brine pre-flood, 160 -, chemical, 42, 137, 162 -, core, 137 -, CO 2, 44, 113, 137, 157, 160, 161,275,379 -, cyclic, 44, 45 -, fire, 137, 275 -, immiscible gas, 896 -, miscible, 42, 44, 45, 137,275,894, 896 -, pilot, process pilot, 35, 159 - - , formation evaluation, 7 -, polymer, 162, 275,296, 298-300 -, solvent, 896-898 -, steam, 46, 275 -, tertiary, 195 -, vertical, 896, 898 -, water, 23, 25, 27-29, 33, 34, 41, 42, 44, 45, 112, 113,137, 157,284, 287,290,293,296, 302,307-310, 332,356,357,378,380,384, 387, 436, 440, 444, 480, 496, 497, 869-871,874, 877, 878, 881 , displacement efficiency, 871,894 - - , hot water, 137 , performance, 883 , versus vugs, 508, 874, 948 Florida, 301,468, 481,482, 484 Fluid displacement, 867 Fluid flow, 1,306, 232 , barriers, 25, 233, 257, 306, 363, 451,882, 884, 887, 896, 898 , behavior, 258 , capacity, 39, 40 , channels, 46 , compartmentalization, 456 , diagnosis, 563,580 -, dynamics, 1,276 -
, flow units versus depositional facies, 439 , fracture-fluid flow, 5 , index, 15, 16 , laminar, turbulent, 5, 6 , models, 446 , multiphase, 378 , paths, 459 , radial, 330 , simulations, 440 - - , single-phase, 4 steady-state, 9 , storage-dominated, 565 , units, 454 , velocity, 4 Fluid injection, 27 Fluid saturation, 1, 106, 122, 182 , irreducible, 1,124 Flushed zones, 188, 190 Formation evaluation, 1,155, 156, 232 , drilling wells, 5, 159 , for flood process pilots, 7 , openhole wells, 159 , production surveillance, 7 , propagation of error considerations, 67 - - , properties of interest, 2 - - , situations, 5 , tools, 4, 157 Formation stimulation, 334, 335 Formation volume factor, 8, 17, 36, 116, 284, 289, 311,514 Formation water, 195 , salinity, 134 Fort Jessup field (Louisiana), 325 Foster field (Texas), 30, 36, 37, 519 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), 14, 167 FRACOP model, 349--351 Fractals, 364, 371,421 -, analysis, 412 -, dimensions and permeability, 415, 422, 426, 430 -, models, 399, 406 -, performance models, 371 -, relationships, 409 -, reservoirs, 432 FRACTAM, 388,389 Fractional water saturation, 36 Fractures, fractured reservoirs, 2-6, 11, 14, 15, 23, 38, 39, 41, 44-46,50, 59, 81, 116, 141, 142, 144, 208, 210, 250, 257,258,260, 264, 296, 311, 313, 318, 319,326, 332,334, 342, 390,457,487, 501,503,508, 615,796, 883, 887-, artifical versus natural fractures, 683 , pressure gradient, 685 , versus depth, 685 -, detection, 54 ,
984 -, displacement versus wettability, 722 -, drainage and displacement, 750, 752 , imbibition, 722, 723,725,750, 752 -, flow capacity, 335,339 -, flow through, 714-720 -, fluid supply (storage) sources, 714 -, fracture compressibility, 719 -, fracture conductivity, 317 -, fracture coning, 724-726 -, fracture continuity, 3 -, fracture detection, 205 -, fracture evaluation, 698, 708, 721 -, imbibition, 722, 723,725,750, 752 , intensity, density, 699, 702, 706, 710, 727 , Relperm curves, 721 , role of wettability, 721 , single versus groups of fractures, 699, 701 , statistical representation, 709 , through transient-flow well data, 740, 747 , through well production data, 727, 736 -, fracture formation , experimental, 689 , folding versus fracturing, 692, 701 , horizontal versus vertical, 703,705-707 , influence of stylolites and joints, 688,690, 697, 701 , joint formation, 697 - - - , microfractures, macrofractures, 689, 699, 712 , relation to geologic history, 687 -, fracture geometry, 329 -, fracture gradient, 39 -, fracture index, 12, 14-16 -, fracture-matrix system, 3, 143,259, 260, 475, 477, 485,615, 881 -, network gas cap, 686 -, orientation, directionality, 8, 28, 143 -, pitch angle, 16, 17 -, planes, 16 -, spacing, 3, 9, 10, 12 -, stimulation, 325 -, fractured chert, 20, 21 -, frequency, 32 -, gas-gravity drainage, 687 -, gas segregation, 687 -, gravity-drainage matrix-fracture fluid exchange, 763 -, induced fractures, 27, 28 -, patterns, 10 -, porosity and permeability of fractures, 4, 711, 713 , magnitude of, 712 , matrix, 713 , measurement, 716 , productivity index, 716 , single versus double porosity, 711,727, 728
-, pressure decline rates, 686 -, refracturing, 354, 355 -, roughness, 5 -, storage capacity, 710 -, treatment, 345 -, two-phase contacts, 684 Fradean field (Texas), 526, 527 France, 11, 46, 812, 848 Free fluid index, 181 Free water level, 62 Fresnel zone, 66 Friction factor 0r in fractures, 4--6 Frio Formation, 33 Frobisher Limestone, 240, 242 Ft. Chadborne field (Texas), 519 Fuhrman-Mascho/Block 9 field (Texas), 43 Fullerton field (Texas), 18, 33, 34, 43,285,286, 303,519 Gage field (Montana), 529 Gamma ray logs, 18 -, induced spectroscopy, 18, 29, 44 -, natural spectroscopy, 18, 22 Gamma ray spectral evaluation, 8 Gard's Point field (Illinois), 519 Gas bubble, 11 Gas cap, 235-237, 240, 243,246, 253,332 Gas City field (Montana), 530 Gas expansion, 236, 243,252 Gas injection, 28 Gas/oil ratio, 17, 244, 245 Gas shrinkage, 243 Gas turbulence, 472 Gela field (Italy), 26 Geochemical logs, 21, 29, 53 GEOLITH program, 384 Geotomography, 4, 64, 158, 215,217 Ghawar field (Middle East), 332 Ghwar-Ain-Dar field (Middle East), 529 Ghwar-Fazran field (Middle East), 529 Ghwar-Harah field (Middle East), 529 Ghwar-Hawiyan field (Middle East), 529 Ghwar-Shedgum field (Middle East), 529 Ghwar-Uthmaniyan field (Middle East), 529 Giddings field (Texas), 326-330, 785,786 Gila field (Illinois), 522 Gingrass field (Kansas), 526 Give-up sedimentation, 76, 77, 82 Glendive field (Montana), 530 Glen Park field (Canada), 238, 523 Glorieta Formation, 33 GMK field (Texas), 520 Golden Lane trend (Mexico), 48, 813, 814, 820, 825, 830, 832, 837, 847 Golden Spike field (Canada), 254, 257, 520 Goldsmith field(s)(Texas), 18, 246, 247
985 Goodrich field (Kansas), 526 Gove field (Kansas), 521 Grain density, 116, 128, 167, 168 Grant Canyon field (Nevada), 811, 831 Gravitational compaction, 3 Gravity segregation, 384, 457, 486, 487 Grayburg-Brown Dolomite, 30, 36, 37 Grayburg Formation, 18, 33,307, 308, 387,436 Grayson field (Texas), 522 Greater Ekofisk Complex (North Sea), 781,782 Greenland, 94 Green River Formation, 280 Greensburg field (Kentucky), 521 Greenwich field (Kansas), 526, 530 Greenwood field (Kansas, Colorado, Oklahoma), 527 Guadalupian, 308 Guelph Formation, 457-459 Gulf Coast (USA), 22, 49, 81, 90, 326,496, 775, 784, 813,825,883 Gulf of Mexico, 80, 420, 422 Gypsum, 145, 169, 173, 179, 466 Gypsy Basin field (Montana), 530 Hadriya reservoir (Middle East), 332 Halite, 145, 173 Hall-Gurney field (Kansas), 831 Hanifa reservoir (Saudi Arabia), 332 Hanson field (Texas), 521 Hardesty field (Kansas), 530 Harmattan East field (Canada), 812 Harmattan field (Canada), 868 Harmattan-Elkton field (Canada), 519, 812 Harper field (Texas), 18,489 -, San Andres pool (Texas), 262 Hasmark Dolomite, 281 Hausserman field (Nebraska), 526 Hawkins field (Texas), 897 Haynesville field, limestone (Louisiana), 21,346, 348, 351,519 Healdton field (Oklahoma), 810, 831 Heavy oil, 46, 47, 123 Hidra Formation, 777 Highstand systems tract, 59, 76, 77, 80, 90 Hingle plots, 17, 46, 197 Hith Anhydrite, 96 Hobbs field, reservoir (New Mexico), 248, 338 Hod Formation, 415,777 Holocene, 94, 468, 802 Homeglen-Rimbey field (Canada), 237,238,523 Horizontal wells, drilling of, 45, 48,295,296, 310, 313-316, 318-325,329, 331-333,350, 353 , slant horizontal drilling, 295,296, 310, 320, 321,324, 325 Horseshoe Atoll (reef) trend, field (Texas), 48, 812, 814, 821,831,837
Hortonville field (Kansas), 519 Howard Glasscock field (Texas), 340, 345,526, 529 Huat Canyon field (Texas), 526 Huat field (Texas), 521 Hugoton Embayment (USA), 306 Hugoton field (Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado), 297, 302, 304-307, 526 Hungary, 812 Hunton Limestone, Group, 2, 3, 21,302, 814 Hutex field (Texas), 526 Huxford field (Alabama), 325 Hydraulic fracturing, 296, 297, 313, 333, 334, 336, 340, 344, 346, 347, 350, 353 Hydrocarbon recovery, 17, 23 Hydrodynamic, hydrostatic pressure, 21, 22 H2S, 113 Illinois, 519, 522, 524, 525,527-530, 811 Illinois Basin (USA), 240, 241, 301, 811, 831 Image analysis, 26, 32, 51, 61, 178, 184, 202, 271,435 Imaging logs, 56, 65 Imbibition, 27, 28, 44, 47, 260, 489, 494, 501, 502, 504, 722, 723,880 Impression packer tests, 28 India, 813 Indiana, 266, 519, 520, 521,527, 810, 827 Indiana Limestone, 281,345 Indian Basin field (New Mexico), 531 Indonesia, 272, 418, 419, 421,422 Induced gamma ray spectroscopy logs, 18, 29, 44 Infill drilling, wells, development, 41, 42, 234, 295-300, 302-304, 307-310,324, 871,884 Injected water, 24, 27, 194, 362, 380, 384, 497, 511,870 , injectant loses, 162 - - , injection balancing, 884 , rate, tests, 38, 194 , thief zones, 28 Interfacial tension, 939, 940, 942, 944 Interference tests, 28, 631 Internal (reservoir) energy, 23 Intisar "D" field (Libya), 813, 831 Invasion (mud filtrate), 52, 53 Invasion (water), 123, 124, 182, 188, 203,204, 260, 488, 501,502, 881 Iran, 23,235, 502 Iraq, 503, 813,840 Irion 163 field (Texas), 829 Irreducible water, 18, 19, 31, 38, 182, 390, 484, 485 Irvine-Fumace field (Kentucky), 45 Ishimbay field (former Soviet Union), 812 Italy, 26, 813, 831
986 Jamin effect, 948 Jay field (Florida), 883,885 Jingo field (Kentucky), 529 J.M. field (Texas), 59, 210 John Creek field (Kansas), 24, 526 Johnson/Grayburg field (Texas), 43 Johnson/J.L. "AB" field (Texas), 43 Jordan field (Texas), 24 Judy Creek field, pool, reef (Canada), 239, 240, 496, 497, 868, 869, 882 Judy Creek South field (Canada), 239, 240 Jurassic, 72, 90, 325, 331,332, 345, 359, 481, 508, 510, 782, 792, 803 Kansas, 24, 74, 247,297, 301,302, 304-306, 519531,790, 810-812, 814 Kansas City Group, 96 Karabala carbonates, 498, 499 Karst, 797-856 -, associated mineral deposits, 797 -, controls on karstification, 801 , karst-forming systems, 799, 800, 805 , polygenetic, polycyclic karsts, 799,800, 834, 840, 845 , sulfuric acid oil-field karsts, 799, 805 -, karstic carbonates, dolomite, 46, 47 -, pay thickness, continuity, heterogeneity, 840844 -, petrophysical characteristics, 833-846 , megascopic dissolution, 834 , numbers of caves, caverns, 834, 836, 837 , porosity associated with breccias, 837840, 851 - - - , porosity preservation, loss, 834, 835 , porosity types, 834, 837 , recovery efficiency, 845 , transmissability, 844 -, porosity, permeability, 259, 361,797,804, 818, 820, 833,846 , facies selectivity, non-selectivity, 803,806 , timing of porosity formation, 825 -, relation to fractures, faults, joints, 806, 827, 828, 837, 844 -, relation to sea level, 800 -, relation to unconformities, 797-799, 801,804, 806, 807, 818, 826, 828, 840 -, reserves , producible, 828, 830-832 , rates of production, 832 , recovery efficiency, 845 , ultimate recoverable, 797, 832 - , reservoir compartmentalization, 805, 842845 -, reservoir relief, 825 -, structural expression, 825 -, subsurface recognition, 797, 837, 847
, bit drops, 837, 851 cave cements, 847, 851 , drill cuttings, 847 , drilling breaks, rates, 837, 847 , from dipmeter, 851 , from well data, 848, 851 , loss of circulation, mud, 838, 851 , seismic, 847-853 - - - , subsurface mapping, 847 -, topography, 95 -, trap types, classification, 807-814 , buried hills, 806, 807, 814-816, 818--825, 833, 840, 844, 847, 853 - - - , paleogeomorphic, subunconformity, 792, 797, 807, 818 , supraunconformity, 793 -, types, classification , buried paleokarsts, 806 , Caribbean style, 802, 804, 805 , depositional paleokarsts, 803 , diagenetic terranes, 803 , general model, 804, 805 , interregional karsts, 805 , paleokarsts, 806 , relict paleokarsts, 806 Keep-up sedimentation, 59, 73, 80, 82 Keg River pool (Canada), 890 Kelly-Snyder field (Texas), 278,520, 821 Kentucky, 45,326, 521,529 Keystone field (Texas), 24 Khami Limestone, 235 Kimmeridge Clay, 782,792 Kincaid field (Illinois), 831 Kirkuk Group, field (Iraq), 502, 504, 799, 813, 840 Klinkenberg effect, corrected permeability, 121, 145, 146, 201,472 Knowledge-based systems, for formation evaluation, 13 Knox carbonates, 816 Komi Republic (former Soviet Union), 47 Kraft-Prusa field, trend (Kansas), 810, 814, 815, 831 Kriging, 363,364, 890, 891 Kurkan reservoir, field (Turkey), 498, 499 Kuwait, 275
---,
Lacq Superieur field (France), 46 Lacunarity, 271 Lacey field (Oklahoma), 811 Lake Tanganyika, 97 Lamesa West field (Texas), 521 LANDSAT, 8 Lansing-Kansas City Group, 302, 481,483,484 Lea field (New Mexico), 523 Lec field (Florida), 885
987 Leduc Formation, pool, reef (Canada), 237,253, 490-493,496, 501 Leduc-Woodbend field (Canada), 238, 529 Lekhwair Formation, 95, 96 Leonardian, 296,300 Lerado field (Kansas), 526 Lerado SW field (Kansas), 522 Levelland field (Texas), 338,342 Levelland Northeast field (Texas), 527 Libya, 74, 519, 802, 813, 831 Lima-Indiana trend (Indiana), 810, 827 Lime, manufacture, 46 Lineament analysis, 8 Liquid saturation, 17-19 Lithology, determination, 13 Little Beaver East field (Montana), 522 Little Beaver field (Montana), 522 Little Knife field (Wyoming), 68, 381,383,385, 386 Livengood field (Kansas), 523 Llanos field (Kansas), 522,523 Lockport Dolomite, 45 LOGIX, 167 Log-inject-log process, 42 Logs, logging -, acoustical, 28, 168, 169, 179 , acoustic waveform, 207, 208 -, borehole televiewer, 28, 42, 209, 215 -, cased-hole logs, 159 -, core gamma, 107 -, density, density-neutron, crossplots, 107, 108, 162, 165, 168-170 --, acoustic crossplots, 169 , photoelectric factor crossplots, 169 -, dielectric, 192 -, dipmeter, 208 -, gamma ray, 168, 172 ---, spectroscopy, 168, 172, 173, 175, 181, 195 -, geochemical, 25, 27, 175, 181 -, grain density, 164 -, Hingle plots, 169 -, imaging logs, 208 , array resistivity, 215 -, Leverett "J" function, 494, 495 -, measurements while drilling, 159 -, M-N plots, 169 -, mud logging, 158, 199 -, neutron, 179 , pulsed neutron capture, 180, 192-196, 198 -, NML, 181, 195,466 -, NMR (magnetic resonance imaging), 179, 184, 199, 462, 466, 468, 469 -, nuclear, 27, 168 -, photo-electric cross section log, 165 -, porosity-lithology crossplots, 168, 169
-, -, -, -, -,
resistivity, 27, 107, 168, 204 shear versus compression travel time plots, 169 spectral density, 169 spontaneous potential (SP), 168, 204 thermal neutron, 169, 180 , epithermal neutron, 169, 180 Loma de la Lata field (Argentina), 331,332 Loring field (Mississippi), 527 Louisiana, 20, 21,146, 208, 325,346, 519 Lower Clear Fork, 304 Lower Fars Formation, 503 Low-permeability reservoirs, 2 Lowstand, lowstand wedges, 73, 76-80 Lucia classification, 178 Lundgren field (Kansas), 523 Luther S.E. field (Texas), 519 M-N plots, 17 Maben field (Black Warrior Basin), 810, 831 Macedonia Dorcheat field (Arkansas), 24 Mackerel field (Australia), 851,854 Madison Group, Limestone, 326, 359-362, 381, 383, 384 Magnolia field (Arkansas), 24, 248,522 Magutex field (Texas), 523,526 Mardin Group, 498 Marine pool (Illinois), 811,825 Martin field (Texas), 24 Matrix identification plots, 17 Matrix porosity, permeability, 3, 44, 47 Matzen field (Austria), 812 Matzen-Schonkirchen-Reyersdorf field (Austria), 824 Maureen Formation, 778 Maydelle field (Texas), 527 McClosky Limestone, 240, 241 McElroy field (Texas), 452, 519 McFarland field (Texas), 523 McKamie field (Texas), 24 McKnight reservoir (Texas), 304, 305 Means field (Texas), 33, 34, 43,286 Measurement while drilling logs, 4, 60 Mediterranean Basin, 813 Megabreccias, 87 Menger sponge, 267, 273, 415 Mercury injection, 119, 120, 183 Mesozoic, 72, 94 Mexico, 39, 40, 48, 80, 326, 508, 510, 598, 664, 813,820, 825,830, 832, 837, 840, 847 Miami Formation, 468 Michigan, 522, 810, 811 Michigan Basin (USA), 49, 74, 79, 301,787, 810, 811, 814, 819, 825,827, 828, 830,837, 844, 849 Michigan Basin Pinnacle Reef trend (Michigan Basin), 811
988 Micrologs, 53 Microresistivity logs, 39 Midale field, trend, carbonates (Williston Basin), 44, 881,883 Midcontinent (USA), 96 Middle East, 3, 13, 21, 27, 48, 53, 72, 167, 176, 205, 231,262,326, 332,468,469,793,799, 825 Midland Basin (Texas), 44, 80, 338, 436, 811, 812 Midland Farms field (Texas), 830 Midway field (Kansas), 24, 248 Mild Creek field (Arkansas), 24 Mill Creek field (Kansas), 523 Mineral identification plots, 171 Minipermeameter, 50, 61,436 Miocene, 20, 74, 146, 502, 503,782 Mishrif Formation, 80 Mission Canyon Formation, 381,383, 814 Mississippi, 208, 481,482,484, 525,527 Mississippian, 38, 39, 41, 44, 96, 240, 326, 345, 359, 381, 472, 802, 814, 820, 822, 868, 881,883 Mississippian "chat", 96 Mississippi-Solid Formation, 258 Missouri, 523 Mobile oil, gas, 32-34, 41,233, 275,283, 289, 298 Monahans field (Texas), 24 Monarch field (Montana), 521 Montana, 291, 301,359, 521-526, 529-531,802 Montanazo field (Spain), 830 Monte Carlo method, sampling, 216, 217, 363, 403,405 Montgomery field (Indiana), 521 Morrow County field (Ohio), 520 Mound Lake field (Texas), 523 Mounds, mudmounds (carbonate), 76, 90 Mount Holly pool (Arkansas), 253,523 Moveable oil, 3 Mt. Auburn field (Illinois), 831 Mudcake, 204 Mud filtrate invasion, 168, 182, 189, 199, 203 Mud logging, 4, 47, 60 Mud-skeletal banks, 76, 91, 92 Nagylengyel field (Hungary), 812 Natih field(s)(Middle East), 48, 813,825 Native energy, 17 Nebraska, 525, 526, 790 Net formation thickness, determination, 59 Neuguen Basin (Argentina), 331,789 Neutron logs, 16, 17, 29, 47 Neva West field (Texas), 530 Nevada, 526 Newbaden (New Baden) East field (Illinois), 529
Newburg field (Williston Basin), 812, 830 Newbury field (Kansas), 24, 523 Newhope (New Hope) field (Black Warrior Basin), 519, 810, 831 New Mexico, 18, 19, 33, 49, 72, 96, 258, 290, 293,299--301,338,379, 387,436, 444, 453, 461,462,466, 520, 521,523,525, 531, 811 New Richland field (Texas), 523 Niagara Formation, 481,483,484 Niobrara Chalk, 789-792 Nitrogen injection, 44 Norman Wells field (Canada), 883 Norphlet Formation, 883 North Anderson Ranch field (New Mexico), 520 North China Basin, 810 North Cowden field (Texas), 18 North Dakota, 291,326, 381,383,385, 386 North field (Qatar), 813 North Personville field (Texas), 346, 348, 351 North Sea, 49, 80, 81, 137, 415, 416, 775-777, 769, 781,783-785,788,789, 790, 850, 884, 894 Northville field (Ohio-Indiana), 810 Norway, 762 Nottingham field (Williston Basin), 812,830 Novinger field (Kansas), 527 Nuclear magnetic resonance, 27, 34, 46, 48, 49, 51 Nuclear magnetism logs, 30, 44, 52 Nunn field (Kansas), 520, 529 Ocho Juan field (New Mexico), 521 Ohara Limestone, 240, 241 Ohio, 457-459, 520, 810, 827 Oil-in-place, 2, 4, 33, 42,296 Oil saturation, 18, 25, 112, 123, 141, 159, 182, 384 , fractional, 18 , residual, 112, 123, 136, 196 Oil viscosity, 8 Oil-water relative permeabilities, 31, 38 Oklahoma, 2, 20, 21, 45, 49, 74, 258, 276, 293, 299, 301,304, 306, 530, 810, 811, 814, 822, 827 Oklahoma City field (Oklahoma), 49, 810, 827, 831 Oligocene, 33,502, 503 Oman, 332 Opal, 775 Opelika field (Texas), 527 Ordovician, 12, 20, 48, 49, 290, 302, 326, 804, 814, 815,818, 820, 827-829, 837, 848 Otto field (Texas), 531 Outlook and South Outlook fields (Montana), 524 Overburden, 3, 23,236 -, gradient, 24
989 Overpressuring, 50, 81 Ownby Clear Fork field (Texas), 43 Oxfordian, 75 Ozona East field (Texas), 529 Paleocene, 49, 74, 415, 621,775, 777, 779, 782, 792 Paleogene, 86, 820 Paleozoic, 72, 94 Palo Pinto reef, 23 Panhandle field (Texas-Oklahoma), 29, 36, 37, 519 Paris Basin, 11 Parkman field (Williston Basin), 812, 830 Parks field (Texas), 519 Patch reefs, 76, 94 Patricia field (Texas), 830 Pays de Bray fault, 11 Pearsall field (Texas), 327-331,785 Pegasus field (Texas), 529 Pennel field (Montana), 521 Pennsylvania, 12 Pennsylvanian, 23, 48, 74, 92,302,481,814, 821, 837 Penwell (SanAndres) field (Texas), 18,262,489 Perched oil, 898 Performance decline, testing, 232 Permeability -, absolute, 30, 290, 367, 498, 500 -, anisotropy, heterogeneity, 1, 17,389, 438, 454 -, barriers, 882, 884, 885, 887, 896, 898 -, capacity, 38 -, conductivity, 389 -, determination, 49, 201 , from drilling data, 210 , from empirical correlations, 204 , from invasion profiles, 203 , from samples, 201,205, 887, 888, 894 , from testing, 203, 210, 894 , from thin sections, 400 , from well logs, 203,207 - - , modeling blocks, 403 - - , renormalized, 403 -, directional, 8, 28, 122, 144, 201,257, 259, 883 -, dual systems, 880 -, effective, 9, 47, 201,257, 368, 394, 396, 421, 423,430, 431,500, 783,885 -, fracture, 326, 329, 344, 353 -, horizontal, vertical, 3,201,291, 311, 313,322, 324, 325,490, 494, 507, 883,887, 894 -, intrinsic, 443 -, matrix, 3, 41,505 -, minimum/maximum ratios, 8 -, of cores, 107, 121, 122 --, relative, 17, 29-31, 38, 106, 132, 201, 367, 479, 489, 498, 500, 501
-, total, 3, 7 -, variation, 17 Permian, 19, 29-32, 34-37, 39, 41-45, 48, 80, 96, 248, 302, 304, 306-308, 325, 355, 379, 380, 387,466,782, 805, 814, 818, 821,827829, 832, 836, 837, 847 Permian Basin, 42, 48, 49, 72,296, 300-302,340, 342, 344, 780, 782, 799, 804, 805, 810812,814, 818,821,827, 828-831,832, 836, 837, 844, 847, 848 Persian Gulf, 326, 813 Petrophysical models, 155, 162, 164, 167, 179, 180, 232 -, definition, 7 -, deterministic models, 12 -, error minimization models, 12 -, simple models, 13 Petrophysics, 1 Pettit Formation, 21 Phosphoria Formation, reservoir, 32, 45,355,357 Pickett plots, 10, 46, 68, 163, 164, 197, 219 Pickton field (Texas), 519 Pierre Shale, 791 Pine field (Montana), 526 Pinnacle reefs, 44, 74, 76, 94, 95, 819 Plainville field (Indiana), 519, 520, 527 Pleasant Prairie field (Kansas), 520, 529 Pleistocene, 468, 802 Plenus Marl Formation, 777 Pokrovsk field (Russia), 45 Pollnow field (Kansas), 520 Pondera field (Montana), 530 Pore combination modeling, 39 Pore fluids, saturation, 165, 166, 168, 179, 182 , determination, 196 , formation water thermal neutron capture, 198 , hydrocarbon type, density, 198, 200 , oil viscosity, chemistry, 200 - - , properties, determination, 44 , saturation, determination, 31 , water properties, 196, 197 Porosity -, cavernous, 257 -, channel, 468 -, classifications, 254, 258 -, depositional, 72, 74 -, determination, measurement, 26, 178,264 , from well logs, 107 , in cores, 107, 118, 119 -, diagenetic, 72, 254 -, double (dual) porosity systems, 259, 330, 331, 880 -, effective, 47, 390, 783, 892 -, fractal measurements of, 254, 263,267 -, fractional, 9, 496 -, fracture, 1, 4, 67, 353, 505
990 dissolution-enlarged fractures, joints, 48 growth-framework, 468 heterogeneity, 470, 480 in carbonate rocks versus sandstones, 257 intercrystalline, 47, 254, 258, 306, 475, 485, 834, 840 -, intergranular, interparticle, 21, 22, 47, 50, 80, 144, 191,202,256, 258,468,475,477,480, 485,508, 782, 783,834, 840 -, intraparticle, 468 -, matrix, 505 -, micropores, microporosity, 47, 144, 145, 191, 258 -, moldic, biomoldic, oomoldic, 47, 167,266,468, 834, 840 -, pore casts, 468 -, pore combination modeling, 191, 192 -, pore fluid-rock interaction, 867 -, pore geometry, interconnectiveness, 254 -, pore size distribution, 107 -, pore structure, microstructure, 264, 867 -, pore throats, 872, 876-879, 881 -, porosity reversal, 868 -, primary, 81,254 -, secondary, 27, 33, 72, 254, 258 -, single-porosity behavior, 11 -, storage porosity, 257, 480, 488 -, total, 178, 184, 191 -, versus depositional facies, setting, lithology, 255,256, 447, 448, 867-869 -, versus dolomitization, 868 -, versus permeability, 389, 390, 398,412, 448 -, versus reservoir flow, 256 -, vuggy, vugs, 47, 144, 167, 178, 186, 191,202, 205,209,254, 257-259,266, 461,469,475, 477,485, 501,503,508,784, 834, 840,844, 851,876, 887 Porosity/lithology log crossplots, 16, 47 Poza Rica trend (Mexico), 80 Prairie du Chien Formation, 146 Precambrian, 48, 49, 820, 833,837 Prentice field (Texas), 43 Pressure buildup tests, 3, 9, 38, 39 -, drop, 7 -, falloff analysis, 27, 39 Pressure cycling steam recovery, 47 Pressure interference tests, 8 Pressure maintenance, 24, 296, 869 Pressure monitoring, 1 Pressure transient tests, testing, 549 , analysis of variable flow rates, 641 , bilinear flow, 559 , for gas wells, 591 - - - , for high-permeability reservoirs, 615 , for oil wells, 615 , linear flow, 554 ,
-, -, -, -,
- - - , pressure-dependent character of reservoirs, 638 producing-time effects, 611 , radial cyclindrical flow, 557 , spherical flow, 557 Producing water level, 62 Production rates, testing, 156, 158, 165,254, 357 - - , design, history, 105,234 Production surveillance, formation evaluation, 7 Production tests, 4, 45, 52, 59 Productivity index, 342 Progradation, 60 Propagation of error considerations, in formation evaluation, 67 Puckett field (Texas), 527, 804, 840 Pulsed neutron capture logs, 56, 64, 65 Pyrite, 164 Pyrobitumen, 259 Pyrolysis analysis, 49 ,
Qatar, 96, 661, 813 Quantitative fluorescence technique, 47, 199 Quaternary, 94 Quintico Formation, 332 Radiological imaging, 456 Rainbow field, area (Canada), 78, 79, 531 Rainbow-Zama reservoir (Canada), 498 Ramps, 75 Rapid River field (Michigan Basin), 811 Recovery -, contiguous water, 869 -, conventional techniques, 231 -, cumulative, 319 -, displacement efficiency, 872, 877 -, efficiency, 48, 275--277, 296, 451,496, 510, 512, 514, 515, 878 -, enhanced, enhancement, EOR, 1, 25, 33, 42, 105,144, 232,233,257,263,275,367,489, 867, 869, 898 -, estimates, 17 -, factor, 248, 252, 253,497, 516, 517, 894 -, from different reservoir classes, 231,232 -, incremental, 295,297 -, oil retention, 879 -, oil trapping, 874-876 -, primary, 1, 17, 25, 28, 105, 233, 275, 287, 867, 868, 871 -, rate, 253,262 -, recoverable reserves, 2, 231 -, residual oil, saturation, 870, 897 -, secondary, 1, 23, 28, 32, 33, 105, 275, 284, 295,296, 307, 367, 867, 870, 871,894 -, tertiary, 1, 156, 867, 895 -, thermal, 42, 45 -, ultimate, 2, 4, 41,233, 246, 253, 302, 329,
991 356,485,486,488,490,494, 496,505,512, 515, 871, 884, 885, 896, 897-, unrecovered oil, gas, 289 -, versus rate of withdrawal, 488-496 -, water retention, 879 Red River Formation, 290, 291 Redwater (D-3) reservoir, field (Canada), 252, 496, 497, 529, 869 Reefs, 50, 60, 74, 76, 77, 90-92, 257-259, 280, 339, 340, 379,497, 805,867, 869, 882, 883, 896 Reeves field (Texas), 521 Renqiu field (China), 48, 49, 799, 810, 820, 823, 825, 837, 840, 845, 846 Reserve estimation, 1, 33, 105, 157, 232 , global reserves, 48, 871 Reservoirs -, analysis, 2 -, anatomy, geometry, 275 -, anisotropy, heterogeneity, 1, 25, 34, 231,233, 358, 362 -, characterization, 1,106, 232-234, 358, 435 -, classifications, environments, 1,234, 243,254, 274, 276-279 , atoll/pinnacle reef, 277, 287, 292 , barrier, strand, 277 , debris flows, fans, 277 , deltaic, 277 - - , fluvial, 277 , peritidal, 277, 279, 280, 287 , platform, 277 , ramp, 277 , reef, 277, 279, 280, 287 , shelf, 277, 279, 280, 287, 292 , shelf margin, 277, 279, 281,287 , slope, basin, 277, 279, 281,287 , turbidites, 277 , unconformity-related, 277 -, communication, 369 -, compartments, compartmentalization, 25, 47, 332 -, continuity, 25,285,289, 361,882, 883 -, decline, depletion, 1,233,249 -, energy, 234 -, homogeneity, uniformity, isotropic, 1, 8, 34, 360 -, management, 160, 232 -, models, modeling, 1,362, 364, 886 -, oolitic, 23 -, performance, 1, 2, 3, 136, 231,233,256, 480 -, production, 233 -, scaling, 389, 401 -, simulation, 362, 364 -, stimulation, 28 -, stratified, 33 -, water-wet, 27
-, withdrawal rates, 249 Residual oil saturation, 36, 38, 443 Resistivity logs, 16, 39, 53 Reyersdorf field (Austria), 812 Rhodes field (Kansas), 521 Richey field (Montana), 525 Robertson Clear Fork field (Texas), 32-34, 43, 286 Rock catalogs, 10, 39, 51, 146, 164, 165 Rocker A field (Texas), 519, 521,524 Rojo Caballos field (Texas), 522 Romania, 799 Ropes and South Ropes fields (Texas), 529 Rosedale field (Kansas), 524 Rosiclare Limestone, 240, 241 Rosiwal intercept method, 265 Rospo Mare field (Italy), 813, 831 Ross Ranch field (Texas), 523 Roughness, fracture surfaces, 4, 6, 7, 266, 269 Rumaila field (Middle East), 799 Rundle Formation, 38,472, 474 Russel Clear Fork field (Texas), 43 Russia, 45,275 Sabetha field (Kansas), 524 Sacatosa field (Texas), 302 Safah field (Middle East), 332 Saih Rawd field (Middle East), 332 Salem Limestone, 345 Salt domes, 694 Salt Flat field (Texas), 44 Sample examination, 13, 31, 48, 51, 54, 62 SanAndres Formation, Dolomite, fields (in TexasNew Mexico), 18, 31, 33-36, 42, 43, 80, 245-247,258,272,282,283,304, 310, 335, 338-342,344, 345,387, 418-422,436,438, 440, 441,444, 450, 453-455, 461-467,489 San Andres Limestone, field (Mexico), 508, 510 San Angelo Formation, 304 Sand Hills field (Texas), 303-305 Sandstones, 19, 20, 21, 37, 133, 164, 165, 173, 233,240, 241,248,254, 257-259, 262,265, 267, 276, 298,302,332,334, 379, 414,420422, 455, 461, 462, 471,485, 488, 510517, 653,894, 897 Sangamon Arch (USA), 811 San Marcos Arch (USA), 813 Saratoga Chalk, 325 Saudi Arabia, 75, 80, 96, 332, 528, 529, 813 Sehonkirchen field (Austria), 812 Schuler-Jones pool (Arkansas), 248 Schuler (Reynolds) field (Arkansas), 24, 248,523 Seal capacity, 157 Sealing faults, 25 Seismic, 5, 64, 215 -, absorption, 63
992 -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,
acoustic impedance, 61, 63, 64, 72 acoustical properties, 106, 157 bulk density, 68 conventional, 3-D, 49, 158 fresnel zone, 66 imaging, 28 interference, 65 interval seismic velocity, 62 modeling, 70, 71 offset-dependent reflector amplitude analysis, 49 -, reflection coefficient tree, 71 -, synthetic traces, seismograms, 59, 68, 83 -, velocity, 68 -, wavelet, 71 -, Weiner filtering, 66 Seminole field (Texas), 43,830 Seminole SE field (Texas), 802, 803 Sequence stratigraphy, 85,275 - - , seismic, 50 Shafter Lake field (Texas), 24, 43 Shallow Water field (Kansas), 529 Shannon Sandstone, 133 Sharon Ridge field (Texas), 520 Shuaiba Formation, 80, 90, 332 Shubert field (Nebraska), 526 Sicily, 26 Sierpinski carpet, 267-269, 273, 392-394, 407, 415-417, 427,480 Silicification, 256 Silo field (Wyoming), 791,792 Silurian, 45, 74, 79,302,457--459,481,801,814, 819, 825, 827 Sirte Basin, 74, 813,831 Sitio Grande field (Mexico), 39, 40 Skaggs-Grayburg field (Texas), 18 Skin factor, 584, 586, 669 -, pseudo-skin factor, 589, 590 Slaughter field (Texas), 18, 245,338, 519 Slaughter-Levelland field (Texas), 278, 338, 342 Smackover Formation, Limestone, fields (Gulf Coast USA), 22-24, 90,248,253,265, 301, 325, 359, 481,482,484, 883 Snethen field (Nebraska), 526 Snyder North field (Texas), 522 Sonic logs, 16, 17, 28, 59 -, waveforms, 56, 64 Source rock, 157, 173 -, delineation, 18 -, richness evaluation, 49 South Alamyshik field (former Soviet Union), 813, 820, 823 South China Sea, 74, 93 South Cowden field (Texas), 519 South Cowden-Foster field (Texas), 18 South Dakota, 790
South Fullerton field (Texas), 24 South Horsecreek field (North Dakota), 291 South Swan Hills field (Canada), 239, 240 South Westhope field (Williston Basin), 812,830 Southwest Lacey field (Oklahoma), 258 Soviet Union (former), 47, 820 Spain, 48, 797, 798, 812, 813, 830, 832, 840, 844, 845, 851,853 Spontaneous potential logs, 16, 53 Spraberry-Driver field (Texas), 8 Spraberry field, trend (Texas), 44, 45 Star field (Oklahoma), 811, 831,832 Ste. Genevieve Formation, 240 Stillstands (sealevel), 59, 76, 77 Stoltenberg field (Kansas), 815 Stoney Point field (Ohio-Indiana), 810, 828 Strahm East field (Kansas), 524 Strahm field (Kansas), 24, 524 Strawn reef (Texas), 23 Structural and stratigraphic, determination, 61 Stuart City trend (Texas), 813,825 Stylolites, 3, 74, 885 Submarine fans, 88 Sulfur, 46, 333 Sumatra Northwest field (Sumatra), 524, 525 Sun City field (Kansas), 520 Sundre field (Canada), 812 Swan Hills field, trend (Canada), 237,239, 240 Swanson method, 201 Sweep, sweeping -, areal, 883,884, 293 -, efficiency, 25, 27, 282, 284, 285, 287, 289, 292,293,449--456, 870, 872, 882-886, 894 , fracture areal, 36 -, vertical, 162, 384, 883,884 -, volumetric sweep, 872 Sweetgrass Arch (USA), 802 Sweety Peck field (Texas), 24 Sycamore-Millstone field (West Virginia), 520 Tampico Embayment (Mexico), 813 Tank oil-in-place, 4 Taormina Formation, Sicily, 26 Tar, 123, 195 Tarraco field (Spain), 830 Tarragona Basin (Spain), 812, 813,830 Taylor-Link field (Texas), 461 Taylor-Link West field (Texas), 812, 831 Tennessee, 810 Terre Haute East field (Indiana), 524 Tertiary, 48 Texarkana field (Texas-Arkansas), 24 Texas, 2, 3, 8, 18-20, 22-24, 29-37, 41, 42, 44, 45, 48, 49, 72, 80, 96, 133, 146, 165,208, 210, 245,246,258,262,272,276, 277,280, 283,285,287,290, 293,299,300-302,304-
993 310, 325-328, 331,338--340, 344-246, 348, 351,369, 379, 380, 418-422,436,443,449, 452,455,461--468,481,482,484, 489,519-527, 529-531,784, 785,789-791,799, 804, 805,810-812,814, 818,821,827-829, 832, 836, 837, 840, 843, 844, 847, 848, 897 Tex-Hamon field (Texas), 524, 526, 531,830 Texture, rock, 26 Thamama Limestone, Group, 332, 333 Thermal expansion, 46 Thermal extraction chromotography, 49, 200 Thomeer method, 201 Todd field (Texas), 24 Tor Formation, field (North Sea), 415,777, 779, 781 TORIS database, 276, 286, 287, 293, 298, 301, 309 Tortuosity, 415 Tracer tests, testing, 1, 4, 28, 158, 293 Trapp field (Kansas), 831 Trenton fields (Ohio-Indiana), 810 Trenton Limestone, 828, 844 Triassic, 85, 768, 820 Triple-N/Grayburg field (Texas), 43 Tubb reservoir (Texas), 304 Turbidites, 87-89, 199 Turbulence, factor, 38, 473, 474 Turkey, 488, 499 Turkey Creek Formation, 248 Turner Valley field (Canada), 531 Turner Valley Member, Formation, 38,472-474, 868 TXL field (Texas), 24 Uinta Basin (USA), 280 Umm Farud field (Libya), 519 Uncontacted oil, gas, 289, 298 Unger field (Kansas), 524 United Arab Emirates (UAE), 80, 90, 333,830 University-Waddell field (Texas), 24 University 53 field (Texas), 829 Ural foredeep (former Soviet Union), 812 Usa field (former Soviet Union), 47 Utah, 280, 520 USSR (former), 812, 813,832 Vacuum field (New Mexico), 338,342 Valhall field (North Sea), 415 Valley Center field (Kansas), 527, 530, 531 Van Der Vlis equation, 321 Vealmoor East field (Texas), 524 Vicksburg Formation, 146 Video camera imaging logs, 56, 58, 65 Vienna Basin (Austria), 812,820, 824 Viking Sandstone, 240, 242 Village field (Arkansas), 24
Viola Limestone, 22, 24 Virden field (Williston Basin), 812 Virginia Hill(s) field (Canada), 239, 240 Vug, detection, 54 Waddell field (Texas), 519 Wapella East field (Illinois), 524 Warner field (Kansas), 530 Warren-Root method, 741,747, 750 Wasson field (Texas), 18, 43,278,285,286, 338340, 342,436, 438 Water block, 949 Water catalogs, 46 Waterloo field (Illinois), 530 Water level, definitions, 61 Water saturation, 29--31, 164, 184, 192 Waverly Arch, 810, 814, 816 Welch field (Texas), 31, 34-36, 283 Welch North field (Texas), 522 Wellman field (Texas), 524 Well placement, spacing, 867, 882 Wells (Devonian) field, 527, 830 West Brady field (Montana), 530 Westbrook field (Texas), 522 West Campbell field (Oklahoma), 811, 831,832 West Edmond field (Oklahoma), 2, 21, 45,530 West Ekofisk field (North Sea), 781 Western Canada Basin, 257 Westerose field, reef (Canada), 237, 238, 529, 867, 868, 896, 897 Westerose South field (Canada), 237, 238 West Garrett field (Texas), 830 West Lisbon field (Louisiana), 519 West Ranch field (Texas), 32, 33 West Virginia, 520 Westward Ho field (Canada), 812 Wettability, 106, 116, 132, 136, 145, 157, 187, 188, 192, 200, 458, 459, 502, 873-875,878, 881,939 -, in fractured carbonates, 880 -, versus oil trapping, entrapment, 874 Wheeler field (Texas), 21, 24 White Dolomite, 29, 36, 37 Whitestone Member, 468 Whitney Canyon field (Wyoming), 812,820 Wichita field (Kansas), 527 Wichita Formation, 24 Wilburton field (Oklahoma), 810 Wilcox Formation, 148 Wilde field (Kansas), 527 Williston Basin (USA, Canada), 68, 72, 301, 381, 801,804, 812, 818, 822, 830 Willowdale field (Kansas), 527 Wilmington field (Kansas), 24, 524 Wilsey field (Kansas), 527 Wilshire field (Texas), 24
994 Wireline logs, 4, 60 Wireline tests, 4, 33, 45, 47, 48 Wizard Lake pool, field (Canada), 524, 897 Wolfcamp limestone, 281 Wolf Springs field (Montana), 525 Woman's Pocket Anticline field (Montana), 525 Woods formula, 130 Wyoming, 20, 32, 45, 355, 521,522, 790-792, 811 -, Overthrust Belt, 812, 820 X-ray diffraction, 14
Yarbrough field (Texas), 24 Yates field, reservoir (Texas, New Mexico), 48, 248,799, 800, 805,812, 814, 831,832, 836, 837, 844, 847 Yellow House field (Texas), 521 Yemen, 146 Zama area (Canada), 531 Zechstein beds, 782, 850 Zelten field (Libya), 802,803 Zubair field (Middle East), 799