This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
0
(1-43)
1.4.2 Alternative Forms of the Diffraction Equations Several alternative forms can be obtained for the set of equations, Eq. (1-42) and Eq. (1-43), by introducing phase factors in the amplitudes
and obtain the following set of equations:
d-47)
¥-?-* dS
.
jri
— = 2nis.S 8 + — dz ta
(1-48)
Depending on the problem to be treated, the symmetrical form in Eqs. (1-45) and (1-46) or the asymmetrical form in Eqs. (1-47) and (1-48) will be used. We note that the kinematic approximation is recovered by setting
% = T'exp(7cisgz); (1-44) The set of equations then becomes
dr ~dV + dS' dz
n
is, 1 Q
*
g
Or one can also substitute
(1-45)
We have seen above (Sec. 1.3.9) that the deformation of the crystal lattice can be described by introducing a local effective deviation parameter, seff which is a function of r
(1-46)
d ^o
p
&a
I
.,
dz
'
~
da
dz
(1-49)
where a = ag/(2n) = g- R and which replaces sg.
1.4 Two-Beam Dynamic Theory
The substitution sg->sgtC allows one to easily adapt the sets of Eqs. (1-45), (1-46) and Eqs. (1-47) and (1-48) to the case of a deformed crystal. In the case of a domain boundary with a small twinning vector, R = k z ex in the rear part of the crystal, and s 2 = sx + As; that is the deviation parameter in the rear part is slightly different from that in the front part. The presence of a defect, e.g., a dislocation or a domain boundary, can also be described as a local change of g in direction, as well as in length. We have shown that at a domain boundary Ag changes abruptly from g to g + Ag with Ag constant and perpendicular to the interface for a coherent twin. For a dislocation we can define a "local" diffraction vector that would cause the same phase shift as the displacement field R(r% i.e.
g>[r-R(r)] = (g + Ag)'r -gR{r) = Agr The expression for a can thus also be written as g
R = -2nAg
-r
equations with constant coefficients for which solutions of the form S = C exp (2 7i i a z) (C = arbitrary constant) exist, where a must satisfy the characteristic quadratic equation (1-52) This equation has two roots: al t2 = 1/2 (sg ± crg) where (1-53) The general solution of Eq. (1-51) is then + C< 2) exp[7ii(s g -(T g ) Z ]
(1-50)
The system of Eqs. (1-47) and (1-48) can be uncoupled by eliminating S and T, respectively between the two equations. One obtains for S cPS dz 2
dS dz~
g
ti
(1-51)
and a similar equation is obtained for T. These are linear second-order differential
(1-55)
Taking into account that T = 1 and S = 0 for z = 0 and that the Eqs. (1-47) and (1-48) must be satisfied for all values of z one finds that the coefficients Ctf\ C(02\ C*1' and C<2) must satisfy the equations: + C<,2) = 1;
C' 1 ' + C<2» = 0
where Ag now depends in general on r.
1.4.4 Solution of the Dynamic Equations for the Perfect Crystal
(1-54)
and similarly C<, 2) exp[7ii(s g -a g )z]
i.e.
27
(1-56)
and thus, solving this set of linear equations C<,2) = (1/2) [1 +{sjas)] = cos2(j?/2) = sin 03/2) cos OS/2) where the Takagi (Takagi, 1962) parameter P defined as cotan jS = sg tg was introduced. Substituting in Eqs. (1-54) and (1-55) and
28
1 Electron Diffraction and Transmission Electron Microscopy
transforming the expressions so obtained leads to the following relations )-
(1-57)
[cos (TT <7g z) - i (sg/(7g) sin (n
and S=
sin (7i (7g z) exp (n i sg z)
(1-58)
One can similarly show from Eqs. (1-45) and (1-46) that T and Sf satisfy the equations with the initial values T = \ and
d2r
d2S' 'dz2
which lead to expressions for T" and S" which are the same as those for T and S apart from the phase factor exp (71 i sg z). The intensities / s and IT can easily be obtained from Eqs. (1-57) and (1-58) J s = SS* and / T = TT*, i.e. 1
sin 2 (71 a z)
(1-60)
and /T=i-/S
(1-61)
since up to now we have neglected absorption. The depth period is now
Note that in the kinematic approximation, i.e., for large sg, (sg t%)2 P 1, ag reduces to s g .
The expressions Eq. (1-63) and Eq. (1-64) show that as the electrons propagate into the crystal there is a continuous transfer of electrons from the transmitted to the scattered beam and vice-versa, without loss of electrons, as schematically represented in Fig. 1-17. As in the kinematic case, the Pendellosung effect leads to the formation of thickness fringes in a wedge-shaped crystal. The depth period is now l/
(1-64) = {(1/2) [1
which shows that 7T + / S = 1.
(1-65)
1/2
; (1-67)
1.4 Two-Beam Dynamic Theory
29
z=0
Figure 1-17. Pendellosung
effect according to the dynamic diffraction theory: (a) s = 0; (b) s # 0.
By following a similar reasoning for the second root a 2 = (1/2) (s — o\ we find the expressions
The first Block field can thus be represented by: (1-69)
(1-68)
Figure 1-18. Thickness fringes in a wedge-shaped silicon crystal. Note the attenuation of the contrast with increasing thickness (Courtesy Delavignette).
30
1 Electron Diffraction and Transmission Electron Microscopy
with k$} = K+ a^e, where K is the incident wave vector, corrected for refraction by the (mean) inner potential, and e is the normal to the entrance face (see Sec. 1.4.5). The second Bloch field is obtained mutatis mutantis i.e., by changing the indices 1 to 2. The expressions for the coefficients fC{0U2) can be simplified by introducing, after Takagi (1962), the dimensionless deviation parameter s t = cotan /?, which leads to s/o = cos j8 and hence cos OS/2); j
(1-70)
Substituting this "ansatz" in Schrodinger's equation and taking into account that (1-72) leads to the following expression
+ [\j/0 exp (2 7i i k0 • r) + + x// exp (2 7i i kg • r)] X Ug exp (2rci g • r) = 0 g
Setting the coefficients of the exponential functions in k0 and kg separately equal to zero, one obtains (K2 - kl)ilso + U_gxl/g = 0
(1-73)
1.4.5 Dispersion Surface and Wave Fields
Ug i//0 + (K2 - k2) il/g = 0
1.4.5.1 Two-Beam Case
This system of homogeneous linear equations allows one to determine the ratio Rg of the amplitudes IJ/JXI/Q. There will only be a non-trivial solution provided the determinant of the system vanishes, i.e.
The dynamic theory can also be developed directly from the Schrodinger equation. This approach can easily be generalized to many-beam situations. Moreover it leads to a simple geometrical construction of the wave vectors of the different beams propagating in the crystal. We will call K the wave vector of the incident wave in the crystal, given by the relation 2rne(E+V0) = h2 K2; i.e., K is corrected for refraction by maintaining the constant part of the lattice potential, but ignoring the periodic part. The periodic part of the lattice potential changes the wave vector of the incident wave to k0. We further assume that only one scattered wave with wave vector kg = k0 + g is excited, a part from the incident beam with wave vector k0. The wave function for the electrons in the periodic potential of the crystal is of the Bloch form; under the assumptions made, it can be written as + \jj exp (2 7i i k - r)
(1-71)
(1-74)
(K2-k2)(K2-k2g) = 2 = Ug-U_g = \Ug\ in a centro-symmetric
(1-75) crystal
where
This equation represents a complicated revolution surface with g as a rotation axis. Bearing in mind that the periodic term of the lattice potential has an amplitude much smaller than the constant part, one has \K\ ~ \ko\ ~ \kg\ and the relation in Eq. (1-75) can therefore be approximated fairly well by putting K + ko~2K and K + kg~2K; Eq. (1-75) then becomes (1-76) Since K2$>\Ug\2, the right-hand side is small and hence the surface does not differ very much from (K — k0) (K — kg) = 0; i.e., in the asymptotic approximation the geometric locus of the endpoints of allowed
1.4 Two-Beam Dynamic Theory
vectors k0 and kg are two spheres with radius K and with centers O and G, respectively. Figure 1-19 represents the intersection of this surface with the plane determined by k0 and kg. The differences K — k0 and K — kg must either be both positive or both negative. The two branches of the curve are thus situated in the obtuse "angles" of the intersecting asymptotic circles in Fig. 1-19. This geometric locus, consisting of two sheets, is called the dispersion surface. Only the part of the surface close to the Brillouin zone boundary of g is of interest for our discussion. A planar section of this part of the surface is represented in Fig. 1-19. The vectors connecting a point of the dispersion surface with the origin O and with the point G are wave vectors which are compatible with the periodic potential of the crystal, i.e., are Bloch waves. Among these potential waves only those which satisfy the boundary conditions will be actually excited. These conditions require the continuity of the wave functions and of their derivatives at the entrance face. It can
Figure 1-19. Dispersion surface construction in the two-beam case of dynamic diffraction.
31
be shown (Bethe, 1928) that both conditions are satisfied if the tangential components of the wave vectors are conserved at the interface, i.e., if k(i]t = Kt (i = l,2), where (1) and (2) refer to points on the two sheets of the dispersion surface. Graphically, this means that the starting points of the wave vectors of the excited waves must be situated on the same normal to the entrance face as the starting point of K, which is itself unambiguously defined by the direction of the incident electron beam. These geometrical relations are represented in Fig. 1-19. The knowledge of the dispersion surface makes it possible to obtain graphically the wave vectors of the Bloch waves for any given incident wave K corrected for refraction. The geometry of the dispersion surface belonging to g is determined by the reciprocal lattice nodes O and G, which are the centers of the asymptotic spheres with radius | JJT|. (In passing, it may be noted that these asymptotic spheres are the degenerate form of the dispersion surface in the free electron case, i.e., for Uo = 0.) One first constructs the incident wave vector K with its endpoint in O. Through the starting point C of K, one draws a normal to the entrance face of the foil. This normal intersects the surface in the points D and D', which are the starting points of the vectors DO, WO, D G and D'G. The construction produces for a given incident beam the wave vectors of the crystal waves along incident and diffracted directions. The periodic part of the crystal apparently causes birefrigence. The transmitted as well as the scattered beam both consist of two waves with slightly different wave vectors, as already shown in Sec. 1.3.5 for the kinematic case. It is the interference of these pairs of waves that causes "beating" leading to the periodic depth variation in intensity of transmitted and scattered
32
1 Electron Diffraction and Transmission Electron Microscopy
wave. We shall show that the two ap- where o was defined as Eq. (1-53). The sepproaches are in fact equivalent. aration of the two branches of the dispersion surface as measured along e is given We now need to determine the wave vectors #o a n d ^o a s we H a s kg an( * k~ correby A + — A " = a. For s = 0 this separation sponding with the two intersection points MM' is minimal and it becomes l/fg. This D and D' with the dispersion surface. gives a simple geometric interpretation of The geometry of Fig. 1-19 shows that tg in reciprocal space. The relation in Eq. (1-80) leads to two wave vectors k£ and k^ for the incident = (OB 2 + BC 2 ) - (OB 2 + BD 2 ) = wave, which are compatible with the periodic potential: = (BC + B D ) ( B C - B D ) = k± = K-A±e (1-81) = (FC + BD) CD ~ 2BC C D The ratio of the amplitudes Rg can be obsince WD~BC. tained from the set of homogeneous equaIntroducing the vector CD = Aen, where tions, Eqs. (1-73) and (1-74): en is the unit normal on the foil surface, since K cos9 = BC (from Fig. 1-19) we obuo (1-82) R tain finally K2-k\ i
K2-k2 = 2KAcos9
(1-77)
On the other hand k\ -k2 = (BG 2 + BD 2 ) - (DB 2 + BD 2 ) = = BG 2 - DB 2 =
= [(l/2)g-x]2-[(l/2)g = -2gx 2
2
= (1-83)
(1-78)
(1-79)
The roots of this quadratic equation determine the values of A corresponding with the intersection points with the dispersion surface; one finds 1
2KA±cosB
The wave functions belonging to the two branches of the dispersion surface, i.e., to the two values of A± or of R* are thus
Taking into account Eq. (1-77) and Eq. (1-78) and introducing the extinction distance tg [Eq. (1-18)], we can write the relation in Eq. (1-75) as 4
The two expressions are equivalent provided the relation in Eq. (1-75) is satisfied; from Eq. (1-80) one finds
= U-s±a)
2
K -k g={K -kl)-{kl-k ) = = 2KAcos9 + 2 gx
sA - - V -
g
+ x]2 =
and since 2
I ^
(1-80)
H-»)-r]
(1-84)
and the total wave function is then a linear combination of these: W= C+ \j/+ + C" \j/~
(1-85)
The arbitrary constants C+ and C~ have to be chosen so that the initial conditions are met, i.e., so that \//T = 1 and \j/s = 0 at z = e - r = 0
(1-86)
33
1.4 Two-Beam Dynamic Theory
This leads to the following system of linear equations: C + + C~ = l; C + R+ + CR;
= 0 (1-87)
excited in the crystal. Their values have to be determined by the boundary conditions. Explicitly, we have: V =
which has the solution
• r)
(1-88) ] (1-95)
and thus + C" exp(27ii/co -r)
(1-89)
Using Eqs. (1-81), (1-83) and (1-88), one obtains iAT = exp (2 7ti #•!•)•
(1-90)
r
s.
The first two terms refer to the transmitted beam T, whereas the last two terms refer to the scattered beam S. Expressing the boundary conditions T = 1, S = 0 at the entrance face one can determine the amplitude Aa) and A(2) of the Bloch waves from the system of linear equations
i
• exp (nisz)\ cos (JI a z) — ff i — sin (naz)
L
J
Similarly, one finds
this leads to
iAs = R+C+ exp (2 7C i A:g+ • r) + + l?~C-exp(2niifc-T)
(1-91)
and after the same transformation as for il/T, using Eqs. (1-81), (1-83) and (1-88), = — exp[2ni
A{1) = cos 08/2); A(2) = sin(j8/2)
(1-96)
It is easy to verify that the two expressions for % Eq. (1-95) and Eqs. (1-54), (1-55), are in fact identical when noting that
r]
exp (rci s z) sin (n a z)
(1-92)
= C™ and ,4<2)'Cf = Cf\
The total wave function then becomes [from Eqs. (1-57) and (1-58)]
1.4.5.2 Many-Beam Case
•P = [T + S exp (2 7i i g • r)] exp (2m i K• r) (1-93) These expressions are clearly identical with those derived previously Sec. 1.4.4 from the Darwin-Howie-Whelan equations. In terms of the expressions Eqs. (1-65) and (1-66), the total wave function in the crystal can also be expressed in terms of the "Bloch waves"
We shall now discuss briefly how the n-beam case can be treated. An analytical treatment is only possible in high-symmetry situations. The solutions of the Schrodinger equation with a periodic potential are known to consist of so-called Bloch waves, i.e., plane waves with amplitudes having the periodicity of the lattice of the form (r) = uk (r) exp (2 n i k • r)
where the A(1) and A(2) represent the amplitudes of the Bloch waves B{1) and B{2)
(1-97)
where uk (r) has the periodicity of the crystal; it can thus be expanded in a Fourier
34
1 Electron Diffraction and Transmission Electron Microscopy
series based on the reciprocal lattice of the crystal. The wave function is then a linear combination of such Bloch waves: «*(') = £ Cg exp [2TU(* + £)•!•]
(1-98)
9
where the coefficients Cg have to be determined from the boundary conditions. Recall the abbreviations introduced in Sec.
specimen. The intensity distribution in this image is then given by
1.3.5, i.e., Ug = (2me/h2)Vg;
K2 =
2
2me(E + V0)/h . Using the expansion
T*Sexp(27ti0-r) = / T + Js + 2 ] / / T / s
(1-100) -cp)
where tantp = — tan(7iaz 0 )
(1-101)
G
we can substitute these expressions in the Schrodinger equation in its reduced form (Sec. 1.3.5) and then obtain (7g_hCh]
(z0: foil thickness). It consists of sinusoidal fringes with a period equal to the separation 1/| g | of the lattice planes normal to g; moreover, they are parallel to this set of lattice planes. For s = 0 one simply obtains / = 1 + sin
This equation has to be satisfied for any value of r; this is only possible if the coefficients of the different exponentials are separately zero. %_hCh
= 0 (1-99)
One linear equation is then obtained for each g vector. This set of homogeneous linear equations determines in principle the unknown coefficients Cg, a part from a proportionality factor. In practice, the number of equations in this set is limited to the number of beams for which the interaction is being studied. In the two-beam case, considered above in detail, it reduces to a set of two homogeneous equations, the solution of which has been discussed in detail in Sec. 1.4.4. 1.4.6 Wave Function at the Exit Face
The total wave function ¥ in the twobeam case can be imaged directly in the microscope by collecting the two interfering beams \j/T and \//s in the objective aperture and focusing on the exit surface of the
sin(2ngx)
(1-102)
with the x-axis chosen along g. The contrast of the fringe pattern depends on the thickness z 0 . The localization of the fringes depends in turn on s since this determines