Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85 ± 103
The construction of the good death A dramaturgy approach Ronit D. Leichtentritta,*, Kathryn D. Rettigb a
Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, 290 McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
b
Abstract The study examines interview transcripts of 26 elderly Israelis who are describing their own death, using the dramaturgy analysis approach. The study identifies eight meaning-making strategies used to construct the ``good death'': using story in the form of drama; describing multiple scenarios; assuming the director and playwright roles in varying degrees; explaining what a good death is not; comparing previous experiences with death; using questions, similes, and metaphors; commenting with sarcastic remarks and black humor; and describing dreams. A composite drama, resulting from the stories of all participants, is presented in three acts, including the time prior to death, the imminent death, and the funeral. Each dramatic episode is constructed by descriptions of the script, purpose, action area, actors, and performances. The ultimate intent of a drama is to establish new meanings of dying and its aftermath for actors and audience, which is to maintain and promote continuity of one's identity, heritage, and legacy. D 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Good death; Dramaturgy; Israel
Let us deal with the human condition as we find it: in ever changing, ever renewing drama (Sabrin, 1977, p. 39)
1. Introduction ``Old Goriot,'' a classic portrait of Parisian society, portrays Goriot dying, while holding on in hopes that his two daughters would appear to comfort his last hours. They did not appear * Corresponding author. Tel.: +972-3-640-9344; fax: +972-3-640-9182. E-mail address:
[email protected] (R.D. Leichtentritt) 0890-4065/01/$ ± see front matter D 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 8 9 0 - 4 0 6 5 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 1 8 - 9
86
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
before Goriot died (Balzac, 1951). A comparison could be created between the book and actual life concerning the wishful and actual final scenes of life. Balzac's (1951) book portrays in fiction the ways in which individuals build an image of their ``good death,'' their ideal script for the final act. These images often go beyond the deathbed scene as the dying person envisions the completion of an entire life and its legacies (Kastenbaum, 1994; Leichtentritt & Rettig, 2000). This study is the second phase of a research project aimed at reaching an inductive understanding of ``the good death.'' The current phase of the study emphasizes the strategies elderly individuals use while describing the good death. The emphasis on strategies of description is important since reaching a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon requires paying attention not only to what appears, but also to the ways in which things appear, including the strategies individuals use while constructing their viewpoint of the good death (Spiegelberg, 1960). The process of constructing an experience or event is referred to in the literature as ``meaning-making'' activity. The goal of the current research is to recognize the meaning-making strategies individuals use while constructing the good death experience. Meaning making is ``a social act whereby an actor interprets stimuli in a setting and represents the situation to him or herself in symbolic terms'' (Nadeau, 1998, p. 15). Individuals engage in meaning-making activities in order to resolve issues and understand life events and their implications (Davis, Nolen-Hoeksema, & Larson, 1998; Frankl, 1984; Janoff-Bulman, 1992), since meaning ``exists only when implicit knowledge is conveyed explicitly to another'' (Hinds, Chaves, & Cypess, 1992, p. 62). Individuals further engage in meaningmaking activities in order to clarify purposes and values (Samarel, 1995), and arrange activities surrounding threatening life events, such as death and dying, so that a coherent and reasonable account is constructed (Moos & Schaefer, 1986; Parkes & Weiss, 1983). The good death has been recognized as a multidimensional phenomenon based on physiological, personal, interpersonal, social, and cultural domains of life that incorporate past, present, and future time periods (Leichtentritt & Rettig, 2000). The multidimensional perspective describes the good death as a process that is influenced by both individual wishes and social norms and laws (Emanuel & Emanuel, 1998; Leichtentritt & Rettig, 2000). The theoretical and scholarly justifications for the current study lie in the lack of knowledge concerning the good death phenomenon (Byock, 1997; Kastenbaum, 1994). Emanuel and Emanuel (1998) described a paradoxical situation in which scholars are increasingly concerned about death and dying, there are tremendous technical capacities available to relieve symptoms and improve care, but yet we persistently observe the suffering of dying patients and continue to deny death. In order to resolve this paradoxical situation, scholars (Emanuel & Emanuel, 1998; Mayo, 1998) have recently urged researchers to put biases aside and closely examine what terminally ill and elderly people have to say about the ``good death.'' How do elderly people perceive the good death? How is the best scenario constructed? What does this scenario contain? What are some of the modifications that need to be made in order to provide the options for elderly people to experience a good death? The research goal of identifying the meaning-making strategies individuals use while imagining the good death cannot be achieved if ignoring the social contexts in which the phenomenon is constructed. Mishler (1979) emphasized that all human experience is contextdependent and can only be understood within those contexts. Social histories, rituals, norms,
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
87
and laws assist individuals in constructing the good death by specifying the: appropriate place in which death should occur, procedures involved in the dying process, roles of the dying person and his/her family members, as well as the professionals who are involved in the process. Social norms further specify the structure and forms of rituals following the death of a close family member. The environmental context of the current study is the Israeli society where death is very much a part of the daily societal fabric due to the many wars and terrorist activities the country has faced and the constant legacy of the Holocaust (Silverman, Weiner, & El-Ad, 1995). Nevertheless, death within this context is an unexpected, sudden tragedy. Natural dying experiences are a neglected area of study (Malikinson, Rubin, & Witzman, 1993; Shamgar-Handleman, 1986) and an unlikely topic of discussion within Israeli families (Gilbar & Steiner, 1996; Leichtentritt & Rettig, 1999). The prescribed norms and rituals regarding death and dying in Israel are strongly influenced by the Orthodox Jewish traditions (Abramovich, 1991; Sobel & Beit-Hallachmi, 1991). The Jewish tradition emphasizes the precedence of human life over all biblical injunctions (Rosner, 1991). Therefore, the individual's rights for end-of-life decisions have only recently emerged in Israel (May 1996) and include the right for withholding and withdrawing treatment (passive euthanasia). These rights, however, are currently being implemented with many difficulties (Glick, 1997; Resnik, 1998) because hospitals tend to use technology to the fullest extent following the social and religious norms of fighting death at nearly all costs (Glick, 1997; Shuval, 1992). The dying and mourning processes are further influenced by the Orthodox Jewish perspective and follow strict interpretations of the Jewish law. The funeral in Israel takes place within 12 to 24 hours after the death, is arranged by the burial society, and is paid for by the state (Abramovich, 1991). There is no public viewing of the body and the body is not buried in a coffin. These strong norms highlight the need to examine the ways in which elderly Israelis construct the good death in a culture that prescribes one way to die, one way to be buried, one way to mourn over the loss of a close family member; and further tends to block open communication about natural death and dying. The results of this research will contribute to our universal knowledge about death and dying while highlighting the unique characteristics of the issue within the Israeli society. The current study follows DeSpelder and Strickland's (1994) observation that understanding how people in various cultures approach death assists us in shedding light on our own perspectives. 2. Method 2.1. Informants Twenty-six older adults participated in this study which identified meaning-making strategies that were used while constructing the good death phenomenon. To participate in the study, the adult had to be at least 60 years of age, independent in everyday activities, and reside in the community. These criteria were selected in order to involve people who were less constrained by current life situations in their thinking of the good death. Participants
88
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
were located by the use of advertisements, personal connections, and the chain sampling technique (Patton, 1990). The initial contact with them was by telephone to explain the study and all but one of these persons expressed an interest and agreed to prticipate. Fifteen of the participants were women, six of whom were widows. Among the 11 men, one was a widower and one was never married. Four participants labeled themselves as religious Jews and the others as secular. Israel is a small country with a diverse population due to the fact that it is an immigrant society. It is important to mention that Jewish rituals and customs of dying and bereavement have been modified by the immigrants' countries of origin (Silverman et al., 1995). Only two of the participants in the current study were born in Israel. Most of them arrived in their late adolescent years from areas that included Central and Eastern Europe, South America, North Africa, and the Middle East. 2.2. Personal interviews Individual interviews were conducted with the informants during the summer of 1997. The median interview duration was approximately 2 hours, with a range from 1 to 4 hours. All interviews took place at the participants' homes and were conducted in Hebrew. The interviews covered: (a) family characteristics, personal health status, and religiosity; (b) the participants' experiences with death and dying; (c) descriptions of the ideal death; (d) concerns about death, dying; and (e) attitudes and behaviors related to the anticipated losses. Examples of questions included: If you could choose, then how would you like death to occur? Can you describe the process? Do you know anyone whose death was a good one? Can you describe this experience? Follow-up interviews were completed with 4 of the 26 informants in order to clarify their perspectives. 2.3. Ethical considerations Several ethical challenges were potentially problematic in the described research. First, the interviews brought forward painful memories and high levels of anxiety. Sharing personal thoughts about potential dependence, death, and dying elicited strong feelings of discomfort and ambiguity that people typically try to avoid (Vandecreek & Frankowski, 1996). Second, the fact that death and dying in the natural ways have rarely been discussed in the family or at the social/public level, resulted in informants who admitted they had never before spoken to anyone about these issues. Third, the research questions, by referring to the good death, allowed the participants to construct and direct an ideal performance. This process had the potential of generating frustration and anger, as in Israel one's choices are limited. ``What does it matter what I want? You and I, we both know things are not going to be different . . . Israel in 1997 is not ready for that!'' (06) ``There is no point in talking . . . We are just treading water here . . . There is no way things are going to be any different'' (19). Efforts were made to minimize these risks as research ethics was an integral component of each phase in the research process, including the dissemination phase (Lincoln, 1995). Several days after an interview was completed, phone calls were made to inquire about the participants' overall feelings and well-being. Continuing phone calls were maintained for the
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
89
next few weeks for several of the cases. Ethical procedures were developed for each interviewee ± interviewer relationship using case-by-case agreements. These agreements included providing the transcripts to several informants, and avoiding the use of a tape recorder in other cases. Knowing and being part of the Israeli culture further resulted in giving attention in all phases of the research to oppression of the social norms (Thompson, 1992) in Israel (Abramovich, 1991). The research served as an opportunity for empowerment of the participants which entails: (a) viewing participants as subjects rather than objects; (b) providing them with complete information on research goals, processes, and results; (c) treating them respectfully throughout the research; (d) helping them find meaning in their research participation; and (e) allowing their voices to be heard during the research process and through the results (Massat & Lundy, 1997). 2.4. Analysis approaches The analysis began by following the phenomenological analysis approach that requires examining the text as a whole (Giorgi, 1997). The original choice of the phenomenological perspective followed the understanding that this approach explores, not only the essence of what appears, but also the way in which things appear, and considers meaning and meaning making as connected to each other (Carlsen, 1988; Kvals, 1996). The understanding that was reached after the first step of the phenomenological analysis resulted in the decision to then use the dramaturgy approach for data analysis. The dramaturgy method (Hare, 1985; Turner & Edgley, 1976) was appropriate first and foremost because death is a dramatic occurrence for an individual, as what ever else death might be, it is definitely dramatic. A drama is the largest unit of dramaturgiacal analysis that includes the ``five phases of (a) developing an actable idea, (b) providing a stage, (c) selecting the actors and training them in their roles, and (d) enacting the idea, with the result of (e) new meanings for actors and audience'' (Hare & Blumberg, 1988, p. 154). The selection of the dramaturgy approach was appropriate since the language of drama closely represented the ways in which the informants described their perspectives: In my mind, [describing the good death] it is a creation of a whole show with a grand opening . . . in case you miss the premiere, there is no `second chance.' It is a one-time performance, with no dress rehearsals (09).
The transcripts further followed several principles of the dramaturgy approach, which strengthened the rationale for the selection of this data analysis method. The dramaturgy method is appropriate when examining a phenomenon for which ``society is expected to have some knowledge, accurate or inaccurate, about . . . and appropriate norms which govern the role performance of an individual concerning this act'' (Berg, 1995, p. 44). The recognition of the existence of one socially appropriate way for death and dying was strongly evident in the data. In correspondence with the dramaturgical method, the informants cast the roles of actors, including self and family members, in relation to one another in their narratives. Friends, family members, professionals, and semiprofessional persons were also placed in important supporting roles (Hare & Blumberg, 1988). The last principle of the dramaturgy
90
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
approach that was found in the transcripts was that drama provides a basis for defining situations. The informants used the narratives as a strategy to create meanings out of an anticipated life-threatening event: one's own death and dying (Cochran, 1986). 2.5. Analysis procedures The analysis procedures involved three essential steps. First, the phenomenological approach called for addressing the text as a whole in order to reveal different meaningmaking strategies that were used by the informants while describing the good death (Giorgi, 1997). This process required reading and rereading the transcripts several times, allowing for immersion in the informants' words while searching for different meaning-making strategies. This process was a prerequisite for allowing the researchers to select the data analysis approach which would fit best and capture most accurately the ways in which the informants constructed the good death phenomenon. The second step appears in both phenomenological and dramaturgy approaches and requires examining the transcripts in order to identify the dramatic units that are also called acts or episodes. A drama is a story with a beginning, middle, and end Ð a complete action or experience (Cochran, 1986). An episode is the natural unit of social activity during which the informant constructed a plan or carried out a sequence of actions necessary for reaching a purpose or a goal (Harre & Secord, 1972). Third, each episode was carefully analyzed to identify the dramaturgy elements of scene, purpose, agent, and agency (Burke, 1990). Several essential questions were answered in the current phase including: what was done in thought or in deed (a script which might be divided into several scenes); when was it done (individual, social, and natural time); where was it done (action area); why was it done (purpose); who did it (actor or agent); and how was it done (performance or agency) (Burke, 1990)? 3. Findings A clarification is needed before presenting the results of the study since the informants did not perceive death as a ``good phenomenon.'' Death, in and for itself, was mostly addressed as an inevitable reality of the life circle, a process that one has to accept because it cannot be avoided or overcome. Recognizing this distinction allowed for presenting the ways in which participants constructed their perceptions of a good (or in other cases, the least dreadful) death: ``The good death performance.'' 3.1. Addressing the texts as a whole The interviews were first addressed as a whole in order to identify overall meaningmaking strategies. Eight meaning-making strategies were identified. The first strategy was recognizing that the informants' narratives and stories were constructed in the form of drama with a beginning, middle, and end. The second strategy involved the use of multiple scenarios in which informants had more than one ideal script for the good death performance. The third strategy depended upon acceptance or rejection of the socially prescribed norms
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
91
and rituals of dying, death, and bereavement. Participants who accepted these rituals described how they would direct the performance, while others who preferred alternative scenarios, created unique and original patterns as if they were playwrights. The fourth meaning-making strategy involved explaining what a good death is not. This strategy was often accompanied by a fifth strategy that compared the ideal death with previous experiences with dying and bereavement. The informants further used rhetorical questions, metaphors, and similes as a sixth strategy. Sarcastic remarks and black jokes were used by one-third of the participants as a way in which the ideal script of the good death emerged. The last meaning-making strategy involved the use of dreams as a strategy for constructing the good death performance. 3.1.1. Constructing a drama of the ideal death Participants constructed meanings of the good death with the use of stories and narratives in the form of drama. The dramas were constructed with a beginning, middle, and end. They were described vividly and were embellished with extensive detail concerning the settings, actions, and outcomes. The stories were provided with the intention that if the person had the freedom to decide and to control these uncontrollable processes of death and dying, then some things would change. The changes would have the potential for creating outcomes that would be more desirable and would provide new meanings of the person's life. 3.1.2. Describing multiple scenarios The description of multiple scenarios as a meaning-making strategy was used in varying degrees. Two informants had two very different scenarios of the good death. The first scenario referred to a sudden, unplanned, unexpected death: Going out to buy milk and never coming back . . . Quick snap that you do not think about. You do not agonize over such a dying process. One moment you are fully alive. The next moment you are fully dead [laugh] Ð nothing in between, a clear and easy cut (23).
The second scenario described an expected and more prolonged process: Since you cannot reach my age [73 years] without thinking about death . . . without burying some of your best friends and family members, that [unexpected] `good death' cannot occur in old age. A sudden death is NOT a good death at young age (08).
The existence of multiple scenarios suggested that informants did not enter the interview with a well-established script of the good death. On the contrary, the drama was built throughout the conversation as participants made various kinds of revisions, and therefore, further demonstrated that it was a meaning-making process. 3.1.3. Assuming ``director'' vs. ``playwright'' roles A director is a person who provides an interpretation for a well-known script (the social norms), rehearses the actors, and provides cues at the time of the performance. A playwright is the person who provides the original idea, image, theme, or plot for the performance (Hare & Blumberg, 1988). A continuum was identified in the transcripts based on the participants' roles as describers/constructors of the good death. Several informants (n = 3) limited their role
92
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
to the director by providing interpretations for the socially accepted norms (scripts) of death and dying. Other informants took the role of playwright by changing the social script, adding original ideas, and taking out established norms from the performance. Participants also took different roles in each part of the script. One informant clearly moved from the role of a playwriter to the role of director as the script changed and the interview proceeded. Her original script corresponded minimally with Jewish norms and rituals, but as the interview proceeded, she moved closer towards the social norms and ended with a drama demonstrating conformity. This change was discussed after the interview was completed. If I could only make up my mind, I am sure you wouldn't have to sit here for so many hours. If only I was consistent in my viewpoint . . . I have not talked about these issues with anyone before. I think about it, but saying it out loud, this was the first time for me [silence]. I started with a radical [giggle] perspective [pause], but hearing myself say that, It was scary . . . I thought it is too much. This is partly why I think my thoughts were not so organized and I kept on changing my mind . . . I will still have to think about what I have said here today. This is why I wanted a copy of the tape. I am not sure whether I will change my mind once again in a few days . . . (17).
3.1.4. Explaining: what a good death is not The fourth meaning-making strategy was used by all informants who made statements about what a good death does not mean: It is definitely not lying in bed waiting for the process to come to an end. That is NOT what I will call a good death. Allowing people to get to the point in which they can no longer function, they do not look or think like human beings, this is not what I or anyone else can wish to experience . . . (18). Bury me in a coffin, and allow me to control my own dying process . . . and one more thing, please do NOT say prayers at my funeral! (19).
3.1.5. Comparing previous experiences with death The meaning-making strategy of comparison included references to deaths that were perceived as enviable as well as those that were to be avoided (what a good death is and is not). Participants often referred to a dying process of close family members or friends as a way of constructing meanings towards their own death. I wish my death to be like my uncle's death [pause]. It was almost like . . . Um . . . [pause] you can call it a `holy thing' (16). References were further made to customs of other religions such as Muslim and Christian, and different social contexts such as in India, Tibet, or Eskimo: ``Leaving me in my home, letting nature takes its course . . . this is similar to what the Eskimos used to do with their elderly'' (05).
3.1.6. Using questions, similes, and metaphors Questions, similes, and metaphors were used in the process of constructing the good death. Informants consistently checked with the interviewer to determine whether others would perceive their scripts as ``desirable'': ``Would you not say this is a good scenario?'' (03). ``Do you not agree that is peaceful?'' (12). The similes and metaphors were often taken from
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
93
nature, comparing the dying process to the sun sinking: ``dying is like a [pause] like a sun sinking . . . you cannot fight it. In the end it will disappear into the sea'' (11). ``Like the tree that used to bloom next to my kitchen window. One morning it just did not happen any more . . . [gets up to show the tree she is referring to] . . . This huge tree, all of the sudden from being part of my regular view, one morning it was gone'' (13). One informant further used his army career as a source for describing the good death, comparing the dying process to a battlefield, and the dying person to the commander of the performance (06). 3.1.7. Commenting with sarcastic remarks and black humor Sarcasm is defined as ``taunting, sneering, cutting, or caustic remarks, gibe or jeer, generally ironical'' (Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, 1970, p. 1263). A few of the participants frequently used sarcasm as a meaning-making strategy throughout the interview. ``My ideal relation with death is that I do not bump into his territory, hoping he will not bump into mine'' (04). ``You know what a beautiful view you have from the cemetery? It is the place with the best and cleanest air in the whole city'' (07). The use of sarcasm established distance from the emotionally difficult topic, reduced anxiety levels, and changed the focus of attention. 3.1.8. Describing dreams Few participants discussed their dreams as a meaning-making strategy. Dreams were used mostly while constructing one's funeral, a dramatic unit that was addressed only towards the last quarter of the interview. Discussing one's dreams about his/her own death was an emotionally difficult experience. ``Twice in my life I dreamed about my own funeral. It is kind of strange as I usually do not remember my dreams, but I do remember parts from these two [pause] it is strange'' (17). ``It was not scary . . . I am not even sure it was really mine. I assume so . . . I do not remember the whole dream, I have some sights of it Ð but that's all'' (04).
3.2. Identifying dramatic units The second step in the analysis process required dividing the data into manageable units, since one cannot analyze the whole drama simultaneously. Meaning making regarding one's owns death is an activity that involves past, present, and future time orientations. Therefore, the drama of the good death was divided into three dramatic units (episodes), including prior to death, the imminent death, and after death Ð the funeral. These episodes referred to different times, action areas, scripts, purposes, actors, and performances. The descriptions of different episodes did not strictly follow the time sequences, however, because participants tended to go back and comment about previously discussed ideas. They also might begin the description at death and go backward to the beginning of the dying, as in the technique of ``flashback.'' These varying description techniques made it difficult at times to identify the boundaries of the episodes. Other writers have also faced these issues of ambiguous boundaries: ``the problem with a dramatic structure is that one never comes to an end'' (Cochran & Claspell, 1987, p. 18). The fact that the dramatic units were not exclusively
94
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
separated from one another strengthens the idea that all of the identified episodes formed the overall performance of the good death. 3.3. Analyzing dramatic episodes The last phase of the analysis involved analyzing the dramatic episodes. This process required answering six essential questions including: what was done (a script which might be divided into several scenes); when was it done (individual, social, and natural time); why was it done (purpose); where was it done (action area); who did it (actors); and how was it done (performance); (Burke, 1990)? Meaning making is a process-oriented phenomenon. Therefore, in order to stay as close as possible to the data and to the informants' viewpoints (to remain valid and ethical), the following paragraphs present detailed descriptions of the results, accompanied by parts of the narrative from Informant 15 3.3.1. First dramatic episode: constructing the preparations for death and dying The first episode was the only one that was divided into two scenes. The two scenes had the same purpose of maintaining life quality, and were therefore perceived as one episode. The scenes were different in the constructing process, by means of the timing, action area, actors, and performance. The differences in these essential drama components justified the separation into two scenes. The first scene described several weeks or months prior to death and was perceived as a ``warm-up'' scene because it was the first period of enacting the dying role (Hare & Blumberg, 1988). The second scene addressed the last few days or weeks of life. 3.3.1.1. Episode 1, Scene 1. The first scene (warm-up) referred to participants' descriptions of the last few weeks or months before death and was initiated by the understanding that one is now entering the dying role. A person was considered to be dying when death was no longer the inevitable abstraction but had become, in the informants' perceptions, a real timebound condition. How I wish to die, this is what you are asking Ð right? Well, I have thought about that, but there is reality which frightens me, and there is my fantasy, what I wish will happen . . . In reality what are my options? You know there is a long line to get there [referring to the one of the very few hospices in the interviewee's hometown]. So I am not sure what is better, dying before getting there . . . or actually getting there. Actually, I prefer the first to the second . . . Seriously, one should prepare. I, for example, need to take care of all my affairs before I am no longer around, to make sure that everything is organized, that all is taken care of, that things are written down so that my family members do not have to go through all that . . . (15).
The script for the warm-up scene described making preparations for death and dying. The purpose of the scene was to maintain quality of life. Participants expressed their general wishes to continue living a normal life until the very last moment: ``to be independent, to be able to do what I wish for . . . not to pray for death to arrive'' (06). Participants also referred to undesirable scripts (reference plots) including: ``being in any kind of an institution'' (08); and living with one of the children ``violating everyone's privacy'' (06).
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
95
Two main actors were identified in Episode 1, Scene 1: the self and family members. The performances of the participants were active ones, including social roles of ``parent,'' ``spouse,'' ``grandparent,'' and ``provider.'' This active-living performance was often introduced through criticism towards the current social expectations for an elderly or a dying person. Family members were assigned to more passive or secondary roles, such as ``helper,'' or ``companion.'' The warm-up scene was distinguished from the continuation of the good death performance because informants used present tense while referring to their current experiences with old age and sicknesses. The continuation of the good death performance inclusively used future tense as informants addressed the anticipated future events. 3.3.1.2. Episode 1, Scene 2. This scene described the last days of life and was constructed more clearly as a narrative, a drama, and a play. The differences between the script for Scene 2, compared to Scene 1, were in the intensity of the preparations that were required in order to guarantee a ``good death'' as well as a narrowing of the action areas. The script was characterized by intense mental, emotional, and financial preparations for death, while focusing on the same purpose of maintaining one's life quality during the dying process. The necessary preparations included creating a will, in some cases, a living will (although not yet considered a valid legal document in Israel); separating from close family members; buying a burial place in the cemetery, and preparing one's gravestone. The described action areas were limited to one's home, hospital, or a hospice location, which suggested that perceptions of the good death were somewhat limited to prescribed, socially known scenarios: I do not wish to die in a hospital . . . The hospital gives the family the illusion that there is someone in control, that things are being taken care of, that all the people around have the power to heal. It is the `white coat illusion'. I do not wish to die at home. I lived in this place. This is a living place not a dying place. I wish to die someplace else, not in a hospital, someplace where I will have a homey feeling, but still it will not be my own home. I think I will feel OK in someplace located within a natural environment or something like that . . . (15).
Participants were specific in describing the exact location in which the personal performance takes place within the view of an audience (stage). Some examples included one's bed: ``I wish to sleep in my own bed until the last minute'' (18), or the need to have the privacy of a single room: ``I visited a friend who died in a hospice. He had his own room with some things his family brought from home, and I think this is important. I think that was respectful and allowed for privacy. It is more comfortable when you can close the door. It is not like closing the curtain around the bed. He had his music in the background while he was there, and the privacy he needed'' (10). The elderly informants perceived themselves as the main actors as the script called for facing the developmental tasks of completing the preparation for death. Successful preparation involved an extensive series of activities at the backstage, the part of the action area where actors prepare for their performance (Hare & Blumberg, 1988). The backstage staff are the persons who take part in activities that support the performance and they included medical professionals: ``You definitely want a nurse, a physician there . . . someone who knows what he is doing, what can be expected'' (20); lawyers; family members; adminis-
96
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
trative personal, and in one case, members from one's synagogue congregation: ``I wish people to pray for my soul . . .'' (24). Participants further described the roles of the supporting actors: I do not wish my family members or friends to take care of me. I need the people who take care of me to be professionals who I have never met before . . . I do not know why, but I feel it is better that a stranger will take care of my basic needs . . . I am not afraid to die, but I am afraid I might have to suffer in the process . . . Before starting taking painkillers, when I am still mentally alert, I wish to say some words to my close friends and family members. I wish to have the opportunity to say good-bye, and then I wish to be left alone to the care of strangers. I do not like it when people come to visit when I am sick. I do not seem to have any energy or wish to be close to others when I am physically not well (15).
3.3.2. Second dramatic episode: constructing the imminent death experience The second episode described the biological/physiological death and is often referred to as the ``deathbed scene'' in the literature (Kastenbaum, 1994). This episode was present in all of the transcripts and addressed the last few hours/minutes prior to death. The script involved no change from the previous scene in terms of action area, stage, or audience, but there were differences in timing, purposes, plots, and actors that resulted in a decision to begin a new episode shortly prior to the biological death. The purpose of the scene was the wish to establish quality in one's death. Quality of death could be accomplished in a variety of ways, forming the understanding that the deathbed scene is a subjective and a more personal event, within which the participants mostly took the role of playwright. Only four informants took a director role by referring to the Bible and the medical model as guidelines. These guidelines were perceived as a reference plot for ``morally appropriate'' behaviors. Other reference plots were underlined by the individual's wish to establish more control over the timing and manner of death and included withholding life-sustaining treatments (n = 9), assisted death (n = 2), and rational suicide (n = 1). I wish no effort to be made to prolong my life . . . I wish to die when the time is right . . . I wish to die during the day. Most people are probably going to tell you that they want to die at night while they are asleep. I wish for something else. I do not want to lie in bed for a few hours without any life sprit [Roach Haim] . . . . . . I wish my daughters and two of my closest friends, who are like a family to me, to be present at time of death (15).
The dying scene took place in the same action areas. Two participants did choose to change the action area from the previous scene, but the changes were within the identified options, including a hospital: ``When that moment comes, I wish to leave home and move to the hospital . . . There they know what to do'' (25); at home: ``It always makes me sad to see family members who take care of a dying person through the whole process in such a devoted way and then send him to a hospital at the most critical moment [pause] it is sad'' (26); or in a hospice: ``My neighbor was to volunteer there . . . it is a very important work, but I just could not do that . . . I once went there, it seems like a pleasant place, kind of deceptive in the lobby'' (08). Attention was given to the backstage staff (physician, nurses) in maintaining the comfort of the dying person as the fears of pain were addressed.
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
97
Five participants wished to be alone in the room at the time death occurred and therefore gave no attention to casting other actors on the stage. Informants (n = 21) who wished others to be present at their death further described the position of family members and friends in relation to oneself: ``I wish my daughter to be present . . . I wish she will stand next to me'' (21). ``. . . He [husband] will hold my hand . . . all our life we were there for one another'' (17). The diversity of the scripts was further demonstrated in the choice of the main actor. Several participants perceived the dying person as the main actor (n = 6), others assigned only a supporting role to the self and cast others as the main actors, including physician, God, family members, or other people whose presence was requested at the deathbed scene. One informant, whose script involved and agreed-upon plan of a ``double suicide'' (a rational suicide script) with her husband, recognized the need for a supporting actor, but did not specify which role was assigned to what actor: ``The stronger one at that point will assist the other'' (07). The roles assigned to different actors who were presented on the stage varied among `decider,' `helper,' and `observer.' The main role (whether assigned to self, God, or nature) was of a `decider': ``It is God's decision. People should not intervene in God's work'' (24). ``Let me decide. Let me be in charge'' (12). Two supporting roles were identified and labeled as a `helper' and an `observer.' One of the participants described the performance of a physician in the helper role: ``He [physician] should assist in cases where the patient can no longer do so himself'' (21). Others made a more general wish without specifying to whom the request for help is addressed: ``The ultimate proof of love is to let the other go . . . letting go'' (26). The roles of the observers were usually given to family members and friends who were assigned the performances of maintaining the psychological well-being of the dying person: ``It will be easier for me if my friends will be there. We went through so much together'' (15). ``I do not want to die alone . . . who would want that?'' (04). 3.3.3. Third episode: constructing the funeral The script for the third episode was often the longest and most detailed within the performance of the good death. The funeral script had as its purpose to establish a ceremony that is consistent with one's identity and roles in life. It is most likely that my funeral is going to be a huge religious ceremony . . . It is going to be with a lot of Bible reading, and a rabbi. I think the last time I was next to a rabbi it was at my husband's funeral, and at that point. I just wanted to murder the man who had no idea about who my husband was, but he still talked like he was his ``best friend'' [giggle] . . . What do I wish to have instead? I wish for something more meaningful with no religious parts in it. It will represent who I am and what I believe in . . . The funeral should say: `this is the woman whom we are burying right now.' Look! This is who she was. This is what she was like. This is what she believed in. God is not something I believe in (15).
Participants, while constructing the funeral episode, were critical about the ways in which the funeral procedures are carried out in Israel: ``I do not want any prayers. I do not want anything like that'' (13). ``I wish I could have been buried in a coffin, it seems more respectful to me . . . the stretcher . . . I do not want to be
98
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
carried by stretcher'' (17). ``I do not like the way we do it . . . I do not know what needs to be done differently . . . I do not know. Maybe it ought to stay the same, after all it is not a process someone is suppose to like'' (05). ``I do not want people to sit Shiva over me. Let each one of them behave in a way that fits him the most . . . These procedures are just not for me'' (18).
A good and desirable funeral can take place in several locations as the action area for Episode 3 was as specific as the ``place were I was born'' (12) or ``my home town . . .'' (20). Others were more general in their description and addressed places such as nature ``there is something respectful, I kind of appreciate the people whose gravestones you can see while walking in the park, or sometimes even by the side of the roads . . . their graves are not isolated from life'' (06). The action area was further specified, among informants, by identifying a clear stage ``I have a burial place next to my husband'' (15); ``. . . where my parents and my family are buried'' (20). The funeral script underlined a change in the main actor, pointing to the beginning of a move from emphasizing oneself, towards highlighting the mourning family members and friends. Shortly after death, participants assigned the role of the ``star'' to themselves in contrast to the ``main actor'' role, which tended to be assigned in previous scenes. The role of the star is found in previous research following the dramaturgy perspective (Turner & Edgley, 1976) and refers to a situation where one stays on the stage but his/her active role is limited. The script, nevertheless, is influenced by the position of the individual in close proximity to the active players. ``Mourning'' was the main role assigned by the participants to friends and family members. Participants further constructed the performances by prescribing, in some cases in a very detailed way, who ought to be involved, and who ought not to arrive to the funeral. ``I do not want . . . [a person who used to be a close friend] there. We have not been speaking to one another for several years now'' (22). The audience role was further addressed by means of size, as the decision of how many people should attend the funeral was present in the interviews ``I do not wish for a big funeral, only family and some close friends'' (05). A unique aspect of the participants' descriptions of the funeral episode involved one's ability to describe the situation from both insider and outsider perspectives, meaning from the perspective of the main actors as well as from the audience point of view. This was possible since a dual emphasis existed. On one level, informants addressed the individual's physical presence. This would be labeled as a ``bystander'' from a dramaturgy perspective, since the body was required for the funeral and was an important part of the setting. On the other hand, one's identity and character played an essential part in script writing as well as in directing the ways in which the actors initiated their performances for the intended audience response. I do not need or wish for all the talking to take place. In several funerals I have attended, I had difficulties listening to the people's descriptions of the deceased. I had troubles from those speeches recognizing who we were talking about . . . I am not the most `intelligent,' the `nicest,' the `kindness' person in the world. And since people on those occasions seem to have difficulties being critical . . . I can see why, but I prefer that nothing will be said. Let it be quick and simple . . . I believe all the people who will choose to attend will know me and think different things about me . . .(21).
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
99
3.4. Epilogue The epilogue referred to the time after the funeral, but unlike the previous episodes, it did not specify a specific ritual or event in the good death performance, but rather a description of the desirable attitudes and memories others would have in regard to the informants. Participants described the ways they wished to be remembered, the meanings, and memories they wished to leave behind. The epilogue revealed aspects of the last element of a drama by explaining some of the new meanings that informants intended for actors and audience (Hare & Blumberg, 1988). The meanings that were attributed to the time after death were underlined by the wish to establish continuity among one's life, death, and the way one is remembered. The emphasis on continuity calls for honoring one's unique identity and heritage, and establishing a beginning, or allowing for the continuation, of various kinds of legacies. You probably paid attention to the reminders of the car on [name of one of the city main streets] . . . do you remember when the accident was . . . I think at least a year ago . . . And still every Friday that I pass there, I see new and fresh flowers, you think about the family that was killed every time you pass. Their death was tragic, unnecessary, even stupid, but there is something nice in the way we all remember and think of them . . . I did not even know them before (21).
Attention was given in the episode to other family members who had not reached this wishful way of closure to their life. My parents did not have a funeral. They did not have a funeral, a stone, or anything like that. They never reached what you may call `the right peace' [Menocha Nechona]. They do not have a grave, a place, nothing. I wish my stone to include their names . . . a natural stone, nothing fancy, a very simple stone, with the names of my family members who were not buried, and my own name. That's it. Every person needs to have a grave or a stone, so mine will serve several . . . I do not care about anything else, as far as I am concerned, I do not need even the date there. I just care about the names (15).
The wish to be remembered (identity), to leave something meaningful behind (legacy), went, in several cases, beyond the individual, beyond one's life story or accomplishments to the remembrance of a whole group of people (soldiers who never returned from the battle), or the remembrance of a social±historical event (the Holocaust). Regardless of the boundaries around the reference group (whether oneself, family members, specific group of people, or one's cohort), maintaining the continuity of one's identity, heritage, and legacy were the central meanings underlying the informants' descriptions of the time after the funeral.
4. Summary and discussion Several understandings were gained in this research. The first was the recognition that individuals have the cognitive and emotional abilities to involve themselves in meaningmaking process for future, anticipated events. The meaning-making activity was accom-
100
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
plished through a story in the form of drama, which enabled the informants to construct death in a way that corresponded with their unique personal preferences, experiences, and identities. The informants further emphasized the social context, recognizing that meanings of the good death were constructed through telling stories and weaving narratives, but the plots often originated in the culture. The informants' descriptions of the good death acknowledged the procedures and norms surrounding death and dying in Israel. Dying, death, and bereavement were nevertheless described as unique personal processes and experiences because the participants did not simply and passively accept the social meanings. There was also, as Rosaldo (1989) noted, an interplay between structure (culture) and agency (selfhood). The participants altered the plots of the story and the actions of the actors to suit their goal of establishing continuity by honoring one's identity, heritage, and legacy. The research provided an example of the possibilities for science in everyday life, as well as the interface of science and art in the dissemination of research. The study, however, is not without limitations. In the spirit of this unique construction of artistic science that is found in this study, the following critical reflection is written with an emphasis on the dramaturgy viewpoint by answering an imagined drama critic. One of the main concerns of a drama critic would be whether the composite drama that was constructed by the researchers from the stories of 26 scriptwriters could represent the intentions of the playwright. The answer to this credibility concern is complicated, as it has to do with the interview process and the various roles of the participants and researchers throughout the research process (Holstein & Gubrium, 1995). The data for the composed drama resulted from the interactive and emergent processes between the informants and the interviewer, in which the interviewer provoked different stocks of knowledge, shared ideas, and raised questions. As a result, it is difficult, if not impossible, to precisely identify the unique contribution of the informants separated from the interviewer. The identification of the playwright at each scene of the drama is also difficult due to the continually alternating roles of researchers and informants. Just as the acting roles of the participants changed in each episode of the drama from playwright to director, so did the roles of researchers vary from scientists to audience, playwrights, directors, and choreographers (Berg, 1995). The credibility of this study was enhanced, however, by prolonged engagement with the informants and persistent observations over time (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). The interviews were of long duration and the voices of the informants were included throughout the drama for the old (researchers) and new (readers) audiences to observe and evaluate. Another method that was used in order to strengthen the credibility of the study was the involvement of informants in the reporting stage of the study. This report was presented to several informants to evaluate whether it adequately presented their perspective. The dependability (reliability) of the drama was also protected through ongoing communication of several researchers in the process of data analysis. A drama critic could argue that the casting decisions of the researchers were flawed or inappropriate since the auditions were held in only one country and that only one age group was represented. Researchers, however, would argue that in trying to learn about a particular phenomenon in depth, it is important to select informants who have the appropriate knowledge and experiences to contribute data with desirable richness (Patton, 1990). Death
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
101
is a universal human experience that transcends place and time, but the dying process tends to be unique, as it is influenced by cultural norms and religious beliefs. The evaluation of this research should also go beyond the research outcomes and limitations to include its processes and implications. The study brought into light, for the first time, the ways elderly people construct their perspectives towards a topic that is not openly discussed on a personal, family, social, or empirical level Ð one's own death. The drama allowed the informants to convey to others their situations from their own perspectives and their own words. Meaning was created for them because implicit knowledge was conveyed explicitly to another (Hinds et al., 1992) and was understood within a particular context (Mishler, 1979). The research process demonstrated that dramatic narratives and stories concerning one's death can be used as methods of empowerment. Constructing the drama of the good death provided the informants with a sense of control and accomplishment. Participants were further empowered through weaving and constructing choices that social norms would discourage with the purpose of creating and calling for change. Therefore, while having a therapeutic benefit, the drama also had a politically emancipatory function as this form of meaning making called attention to the oppression and the discrepancy between the good death and the current processes of death and dying. These understandings call for social services and health care providers to examine the use of stories in the forms of drama while assisting elderly people in approaching death. The discrepancies between the good death and the current social options demonstrated that the voices of the people, especially the empirical understanding of elderly people's perspectives, are currently missing from the public debates as can be seen by the growing interest in the past few years in the possibility that euthanasia could provide a good death (Emanuel, 1994). The results of the current study strongly demonstrated that the potential effects of acts of euthanasia on achieving a good death are limited. Acts of euthanasia might provide some psychological reassurance or alleviate additional suffering by ending life early, but these options did not correspond to the elderly people's vivid descriptions of a good death. For a change to be accomplished in providing a good death for greater numbers of dying people, more studies are needed following the critical science paradigm of research (Kincheloe & McLaren, 1994). Research in the critical mode of inquiry is concerned with solving practical problems by confronting the injustices of a particular society in the struggle for a better world. Critical science research is pursued through public discourse so that practical problems are defined, power structures are challenged, forms of oppression are uncovered, and emancipative action is taken (Rettig, Tam, & Yellowthunder, 1995). These research processes and results then facilitate the kinds of actions and transformations that are necessary for the restoration of justice. Acknowledgments The study was partially funded by The University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, Project 52-054 `Decision Making Integral to Relationship-Ending Transitions.' The authors wish to acknowledge Paul Rosenblatt and William Goodman,
102
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
University of Minnesota Twin Cities, for thoughtful discussions that facilitated the completion of this paper. References Abramovich, H. (1991). The Jerusalem funeral as a microcosm of the religious ± secular conflict. In: Z. Sobel, & B. Beith-Hallachmi (Eds.), Tradition, innovation, conflict: Judaism in contemporary Israel ( pp. 121 ± 129). New York: State University of New York Press. Balzac, H. D. (1951). Old Goriot. Harmondsworth: Penguim (Translated by Marion Ayton Crawford). Berg, B. L. (1995). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Massachusets: Allyn & Bacon. Burke, K. (1990). The five terms of dramatism. In: D. Brissett, & C. Edgeley (Eds.), Life as theater: a dramaturgical sourcebook (2nd ed., pp. 411 ± 417). New York: Aldine de Gruter. Byock, I. (1997). Dying well: peace and possibilities at the end of life. New York: Riverhead Books. Carlsen, M. B. (1988). Meaning making: therapeutic processes in adult development. New York: W.W. Norton. Cochran, L. (1986). Portrait and story: dramaturgical approaches to the study of persons. New York: Greenwood Press. Cochran, L., & Claspell, E. (1987). The meaning of grief. New York: Greenwood Press. Davis, C. G., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Larson, J. (1998). Making sense of loss and benefitting from the experience: two construal of meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (2), 561 ± 574. DeSpelder, L., & Strickland, A. (1994). The path ahead. California: Mayfield. Emanuel, E. J. (1994). Euthanasia: historical, ethical and empiric perspective. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154 (17), 1890 ± 1901. Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1998). The promise of a good death. Lancet, 351 (Suppl. II), 21 ± 29. Frankl, V. E. (1984). Men's search for meaning: an introduction to logotherapy (3rd ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. Gilbar, O., & Steiner, M. (1996). When death comes: where should patients die? Hospice Journal, 11 (1), 31 ± 48. Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological and Psychological, 28, 235 ± 260. Glick, S. M. (1997). Unlimited human autonomy: a cultural bias? The New England Journal of Medicine, 336 (13), 954 ± 956. Hare, P. (1985). Social interaction as drama: applications from conflict resolution. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hare, P., & Blumberg, H. H. (1988). Dramaturgical analysis of social interaction. New York: Praeger. Harre, R., & Secord, P. F. (1972). The explanation of social behavior. Oxford: Blackwell. Hinds, P., Chaves, D. E., & Cypress, S. M. (1992). Context as a source of meaning and understanding. Qualitative Health Research, 2, 61 ± 74. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: Free Press. Kastenbaum, R. (1994). Is there an ideal deathbed scene? In: I. B. Corless, B. B. Germino, & M. Pittman (Eds.), Dying, death and bereavement: theoretical perspectives and other ways of knowing ( pp. 109 ± 122). Boston: Jones and Bartlett Pub. Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. L. (1994). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research ( pp. 138 ± 157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kvals, S. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Leichtentritt, R. D., & Rettig, K. D. (1999). My parent's dignified death is different from mine: moral problem solving about euthanasia. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16 (3), 385 ± 406. Leichtentritt, R. D., & Rettig, K. D. (2000). The good death: reaching an inductive understanding. Omega: Journal of Death & Dying, 41 (3), 221 ± 248. Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1 (3), 275 ± 289. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
R.D. Leichtentritt, K.D. Rettig / Journal of Aging Studies 15 (2001) 85±103
103
Malikinson, R., Rubin, S., & Witzman, E. (Eds.) (1993). Loss and bereavement in Jewish society in Israel. Jerusalem: Ministry of Defense Publishing House. Mayo, D. J. (1998). Rational suicide? Journal of Personal and Interpersonal Loss, 3 (2), 193 ± 204. Massat, C. P., & Lundy, M. (1997). Empowering research participants. Affilia, 12 (1), 33 ± 56. Mishler, E. G. (1979). Meaning in context: is there any other kind? Harvard Educational Review, 49 (1), 1 ± 19. Moos, R. H., & Schaefer, J. A. (1986). Life transitions and crises: a conceptual overview. In: R. H. Moos (Ed.), Coping with life crises: an integrated approach ( pp. 3 ± 28). New York: Plenum. Nadeau, J. (1998). Families making sense of death. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Parkes, C. M., & Weiss, R. S. (1983). Recovery from bereavement. New York: Basic Books. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluative and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Resnik, R. (1998). At 10 p.m. Itai was taken off the respirator. Ha'aretz, 18 ± 24. Rettig, K. D., Tam, C. W., & Yellowthunder, L. (1995). Family policy and critical science research: facilitating change. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 16 (1), 109 ± 143. Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture and truth: the remarking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon Press. Rosner, F. (1991). Jewish perspectives on death and dying. Jewish Medical Ethics, 2 (1), 38 ± 45. Sabrin, T. R. (1977). Contexualism: a worldview for modern psychology. In: A. Landfield (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Samarel, N. (1995). The dying process. In: H. Wass, & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Dying: facing the facts (3rd ed., pp. 89 ± 116). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis Publications. Shamgar-Handleman, L. (1986). Israeli war widow: beyond the glory of heroism. Massachusetts: Gergin and Garvey Publishers. Shuval, J. T. (1992). Social dimensions of health: the Israeli experience. Westport, CT: Prager. Silverman, P. R., Weiner, A., & El-Ad, N. (1995). Parent ± child communication in bereaved Israeli families. Omega, 31 (4), 275 ± 293. Sobel, Z., & Beith-Hallachmi, B. (1991). Tradition, innovation, conflict: Judaism in contemporary Israel. New York: State University of New York Press. Spiegelberg, H. (1960). The phenomenological movement: a historical introduction. The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff/The Hague. Thompson, J. L. (1992). Feminist methodology for family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 3 ± 18. Turner, R. F., & Edgley, C. (1976). Death as theater: a dramaturgical analysis of the American funeral. Sociology and Social Research, 60 (4), 377 ± 392. Vandecreek, L., & Frankowski, D. (1996). Barriers that predict resistance to completing a living will. Death Studies, 20, 73 ± 82. Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language (1970). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
