Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature
iiâ•…â•…
AUTHOR NAME HERE
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature
`
Jennifer M...
703 downloads
6420 Views
7MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature
iiâ•…â•…
AUTHOR NAME HERE
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature
`
Jennifer McClinton-Temple Editor
ivâ•…â•…˘iv
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature Copyright © 2011 by Jennifer McClinton-Temple All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. For information contact: Facts On File, Inc. An imprint of Infobase Publishing 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McClinton-Temple, Jennifer. Encyclopedia of themes in literature / Jennifer McClinton-Temple. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8160-7161-6 (hc : alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-4381-3268-6 (e-book) 1. English literature—Themes, motives—Encyclopedias. 2. American literature—Themes, motives—Encyclopedias. I. Title. PR19.M35 2010 820.9’303—dc22 2009047605 Facts On File books are available at special discounts when purchased in bulk quantities for businesses, associations, institutions, or sales promotions. Please call our Special Sales Department in New York at (212) 967-8800 or (800) 322-8755. You can find Facts On File on the World Wide Web at http://www.factsonfile.com Text design by Kerry Casey Composition by Hermitage Publishing Services Cover printed by Sheridan Books, Ann Arbor, Mich. Book printed and bound by Sheridan Books, Ann Arbor, Mich. Date printed: December 2010 Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is printed on acid-free paper.
CONTENTS ` List of Themes Included in This Book List of Authors and Works Included in This Book List of Works Included in This Book Introduction Part I: Themes A–Z Part II: Authors and Works A–E Part II: Authors and Works F–M Part II: Authors and Works N–Z Index
vii ix xvii xxv 1 123 423 815 1191
LIST OF THEMES INCLUDED IN THIS BOOK ` abandonment alienation ambition American dream, the childhood coming of age commodification/commercialization community cruelty death education ethics family fate freedom futility gender
grief guilt heroism hope identity illness individual and society innocence and experience isolation justice love memory nationalism nature oppression parenthood pride
vii
race regret rejection religion responsibility science and technology sex and sexuality social class spirituality stages of life success suffering survival tradition violence work
LIST OF AUTHORS AND WORKS INCLUDED IN THIS BOOK ` Achebe, Chinua Adams, Henry Albee, Edward Alcott, Louisa May Alexie, Sherman Allende, Isabel Alvarez, Julia Amis, Kingsley Anaya, Rudolfo Anderson, Sherwood Angelou, Maya Anonymous Aristophanes Atwood, Margaret Augustine, Saint Austen, Jane Baldwin, James Bambara, Toni Cade Behn, Aphra Bellow, Saul Bierce, Ambrose Black Elk Blake, William Bradbury, Ray Bradford, William
Anthills of the Savannah Things Fall Apart Education of Henry Adams, The Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ? Little Women Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven, The House of the Spirits, The How the García Girls Lost Their Accents Lucky Jim Bless Me, Ultima Winesburg, Ohio I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings Beowulf Frogs, The Lysistrata Handmaid’s Tale, The Surfacing Confessions of St. Augustine, The Emma Pride and Prejudice Sense and Sensibility Go Tell It on the Mountain Salt Eaters, The Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slave Adventures of Augie March, The “Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge, An” Black Elk Speaks Songs of Innocence and of Experience Fahrenheit 451 Martian Chronicles, The Of Plymouth Plantation
ix
xâ•…â•…
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature
Brontë, Charlotte Jane Eyre Brontë, Emily Wuthering Heights Browning, Robert “My Last Duchess” Bunyan, John Pilgrim’s Progress, The Byron, George Gordon Byron, Don Juan Lord Camus, Albert Stranger, The Cao Xueqin Dream of the Red Chamber Capote, Truman In Cold Blood: A True Account of a Multiple Murder and Its Consequences Carroll, Lewis Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland Carver, Raymond “Cathedral” Cather, Willa My Ántonia O Pioneers! Chaucer, Geoffrey Canterbury Tales, The Chekhov, Anton Seagull, The Chesnutt, Charles W. “Goophered Grapevine, The” Chopin, Kate Awakening, The Cisneros, Sandra House on Mango Street, The Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories Coetzee, J. M. Waiting for the Barbarians Coleridge, Samuel Taylor “Rime of the Ancient Mariner, The” Conrad, Joseph Heart of Darkness Lord Jim Crane, Stephen Open Boat, The Red Badge of Courage, The Dante Alighieri Divine Comedy, The Davies, Robertson Fifth Business Davis, Rebecca Harding Life in the Iron Mills Defoe, Daniel Moll Flanders Robinson Crusoe DeLillo, Don White Noise Dickens, Charles Christmas Carol, A David Copperfield Great Expectations Oliver Twist Tale of Two Cities, A Dickinson, Emily poems Dinesen, Isak Out of Africa Dos Passos, John U.S.A. trilogy Dostoyevsky, Fyodor Crime and Punishment Douglass, Frederick Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave. Written by Himself Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan Hound of the Baskervilles, The Dreiser, Theodore American Tragedy, An Sister Carrie DuBois, W. E. B. Souls of Black Folk, The
List of Authors and Works Included in This Bookâ•…â•… xi Edwards, Jonathan “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Eliot, T. S. “Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, The” Waste Land, The Ellison, Ralph Invisible Man Emerson, Ralph Waldo “American Scholar, The” “Divinity School Address, The” “Self-Reliance” Equiano, Olaudah Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African. Written by Himself, The Erdrich, Louise Bingo Palace, The Love Medicine Tracks Euripides Medea Faulkner, William As I Lay Dying Light in August “Rose for Emily, A” Sound and the Fury, The Fielding, Henry Tom Jones Fitzgerald, F. Scott Great Gatsby, The Tender Is the Night Flaubert, Gustave Madame Bovary Forster, E. M. Passage to India, A Room with a View, A Frank, Anne Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl Franklin, Benjamin Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, The Frost, Robert poems Gaines, Ernest J. Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, The Lesson Before Dying, A García Márquez. Gabriel One Hundred Years of Solitude Gaskell, Elizabeth North and South Gay, John Beggar’s Opera, The Gilman, Charlotte Perkins Yellow Wallpaper, The Glaspell, Susan Trifles Golding, William Lord of the Flies Gordimer, Nadine Burger’s Daughter Grass, Günter Tin Drum, The Greene, Graham Heart of the Matter, The Haley, Alex, and Malcolm X Autobiography of Malcolm X, The Hansberry, Lorraine Raisin in the Sun, A Hardy, Thomas Jude the Obscure Tess of the d’Urbervilles Harte, Bret “Luck of Roaring Camp, The” “Outcasts of Poker Flats, The” Hawthorne, Nathaniel “The Birth-mark” House of the Seven Gables, The “Rappaccini’s Daughter”
xiiâ•…â•…
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature
Heller, Joseph Hemingway, Ernest Hersey, John Hesse, Herman Hinton, S. E. Homer Houston, Jeanne Wakatsuki Hughes, Langston Hurston, Zora Neale Huxley, Aldous Ibsen, Henrik Irving, John Irving, Washington Ishiguro, Kazuo Jackson, Shirley Jacobs, Harriet James, Henry Jefferson, Thomas Joyce, James Kafka, Franz Keats, John Kerouac, Jack Kesey, Ken Kincaid, Jamaica Kingsolver, Barbara Kingston, Maxine Hong Kipling, Rudyard Knowles, John Kozinski, Jerzy Kundera, Milan Kureishi, Hanif Kushner, Tony Lawrence, D. H.
Scarlet Letter, The “Young Goodman Brown” Catch-22 Farewell to Arms, A Old Man and the Sea, The Sun Also Rises, The Hiroshima Siddhartha Steppenwolf Outsiders, The Iliad, The Odyssey, The Farewell to Manzanar poems Their Eyes Were Watching God Brave New World Doll’s House, A Hedda Gabler World According to Garp, The Sketchbook of Geoffrey Crayon, The Remains of the Day, The “Lottery, The” Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself Daisy Miller Portrait of a Lady, The Turn of the Screw, The Notes on the State of Virginia Dubliners Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, A Metamorphosis, The poems On the Road One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest Annie John Small Place, A Bean Trees, The Poisonwood Bible, The Tripmaster Monkey: His Fake Book Woman Warrior, The Kim Separate Peace, A Painted Bird, The Unbearable Lightness of Being, The Buddha of Suburbia, The Angels in America Rainbow, The Women in Love
List of Authors and Works Included in This Bookâ•…â•… xiii Lawrence, Jerome, and Robert E. Lee Lee, Harper Lessing, Doris Lewis, C. S. Lewis, Sinclair London, Jack Lowry, Lois Machiavelli, Niccolò Malamud, Bernard Marlowe, Christopher Marshall, Paule McCarthy, Cormac McCullers, Carson McMurtry, Larry Melville, Herman Miller, Arthur Milton, John Mistry, Rohinton Molière Momaday, N. Scott Morrison, Toni Mukherjee, Bharati Nabokov, Vladimir Naipaul, V. S. Naylor, Gloria O’Brien, Tim O’Connor, Flannery O’Neill, Eugene Orwell, George
Inherit the Wind To Kill a Mockingbird Golden Notebook, The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, The Main Street Call of the Wild, The White Fang Giver, The Prince, The Natural, The Doctor Faustus Brown Girl, Brownstones All the Pretty Horses Heart Is a Lonely Hunter, The Member of the Wedding, The Lonesome Dove “Bartleby the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street” Billy Budd, Sailor Moby-Dick Crucible, The Death of a Salesman Paradise Lost Fine Balance, A Misanthrope, The Tartuffe House Made of Dawn Way to Rainy Mountain, The Beloved Bluest Eye, The Song of Solomon Sula Tar Baby Middleman and Other Stories, The Lolita Bend in the River, A House for Mr. Biswas, A Women of Brewster Place, The Going after Cacciato Things They Carried, The “Good Man Is Hard to Find, A” Wise Blood Iceman Cometh, The Long Day’s Journey into Night Animal Farm Nineteen Eighty-Four
xivâ•…â•…
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature
Paine, Thomas “Age of Reason, The” Common Sense Paton, Alan Cry, the Beloved Country Pirandello, Luigi Six Characters in Search of an Author Plath, Sylvia Bell Jar, The Poe, Edgar Allan “Fall of the House of Usher, The” “Murders in the Rue Morgue, The” “Tell-Tale Heart, The” Pope, Alexander Rape of the Lock, The Potok, Chaim Chosen, The Proust, Marcel Remembrance of Things Past Rand, Ayn Anthem Reed, Ishmael Mumbo Jumbo Rhys, Jean Wide Sargasso Sea Roth, Philip American Pastoral Rowlandson, Mary Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson Roy, Arundhati God of Small Things, The Rushdie, Salman Midnight’s Children Salinger, J. D. Catcher in the Rye, The Shakespeare, William Hamlet Henry IV, Part I Henry V Julius Caesar King Lear Macbeth Merchant of Venice, The Midsummer Night’s Dream, A Much Ado about Nothing Othello Romeo and Juliet Taming of the Shrew, The Tempest, The Twelfth Night Shaw, George Bernard Pygmalion Shelley, Mary Frankenstein Shelley, Percy Bysshe poems Silko, Leslie Marmon Almanac of the Dead Ceremony Sinclair, Upton Jungle, The Smith, Betty Tree Grows in Brooklyn, A Solzhenitsyn, Alexander One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich Sophocles Antigone Oedipus the King Steinbeck, John Cannery Row Grapes of Wrath, The Of Mice and Men Pearl, The Red Pony, The
List of Authors and Works Included in This Bookâ•…â•… xv Stevenson, Robert Louis Stoker, Bram Stowe, Harriet Beecher Swift, Jonathan Synge, John Millington Tan, Amy Tennyson, Alfred, Lord Thoreau, Henry David Tolkien, J. R. R. Tolstoy, Leo Toomer, Jean Turgenev, Ivan Twain, Mark Updike, John Virgil Voltaire Vonnegut, Kurt Walker, Alice Washington, Booker T. Welty, Eudora Wharton, Edith Whitman, Walt Wiesel, Elie Wilde, Oscar Wilder, Thornton Williams, Tennessee Wilson, August Winterson, Jeanette Wollstonecraft, Mary Woolf, Virginia Wordsworth, William Wright, Richard Yeats, William Butler
Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, The Treasure Island Dracula Uncle Tom’s Cabin Gulliver’s Travels Modest Proposal, A Playboy of the Western World, The Joy Luck Club, The In Memoriam A. H. H. “Resistance to Civil Government” Walden Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings, The War and Peace Cane Fathers and Sons Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Adventures of Tom Sawyer, The Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, A “A&P” Rabbit, Run Aeneid, The Candide Cat’s Cradle Slaughterhouse-Five Color Purple, The Up from Slavery Optimist’s Daughter, The Age of Innocence, The Ethan Frome House of Mirth, The Leaves of Grass Night Importance of Being Earnest, The Picture of Dorian Gray, The Our Town Cat on a Hot Tin Roof Glass Menagerie, The Streetcar Named Desire, A Fences Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit Vindication of the Rights of Woman, A Mrs Dalloway To the Lighthouse “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey” Black Boy Native Son poems
LIST OF WORKS INCLUDED IN THIS BOOK `
“A&P” Adventures of Augie March, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Adventures of Tom Sawyer, The Aeneid, The Age of Innocence, The “Age of Reason, The” Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland All the Pretty Horses Almanac of the Dead American Pastoral “American Scholar, The” American Tragedy, An Angels in America Animal Farm Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl Annie John Anthem Anthills of the Savannah Antigone As I Lay Dying Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, The Autobiography of Malcolm X, The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, The Awakening, The “Bartleby the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street” Bean Trees, The Beggar’s Opera, The Bell Jar, The Beloved Bend in the River, A Beowulf
xvii
Updike, John Bellow, Saul Twain, Mark Twain, Mark Virgil Wharton, Edith Paine, Thomas Carroll, Lewis McCarthy, Cormac Silko, Leslie Marmon Roth, Philip Emerson, Ralph Waldo Dreiser, Theodore Kushner, Tony Orwell, George Frank, Anne Kincaid, Jamaica Rand, Ayn Achebe, Chinua Sophocles Faulkner, William Franklin, Benjamin Haley, Alex, and Malcolm X Gaines, Ernest J. Chopin, Kate Melville, Herman Kingsolver, Barbara Gay, John Plath, Sylvia Morrison, Toni Naipaul, V. S. Anonymous
xviiiâ•…â•…
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature Billy Budd, Sailor Bingo Palace, The “Birth-mark, The” Black Boy Black Elk Speaks Bless Me, Ultima Bluest Eye, The Brave New World Brown Girl, Brownstones Buddha of Suburbia, The Burger’s Daughter Call of the Wild, The Candide Cane Cannery Row Canterbury Tales, The Catcher in the Rye, The Catch-22 Cat on a Hot Tin Roof Cat’s Cradle “Cathedral” Ceremony Chosen, The Christmas Carol, A Color Purple, The Common Sense Confessions of St. Augustine, The Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, A Crime and Punishment Crucible, The Cry, the Beloved Country Daisy Miller David Copperfield Death of a Salesman Divine Comedy, The “Divinity School Address, The” Doctor Faustus Doll’s House, A Don Juan Dracula Dream of the Red Chamber Dubliners Education of Henry Adams, The Emma Ethan Frome Fahrenheit 451 “Fall of the House of Usher, The”
Melville, Herman Erdrich, Louise Hawthorne, Nathaniel Wright, Richard Black Elk Anaya, Rudolfo Morrison, Toni Huxley, Aldous Marshall, Paule Kureishi, Hanif Gordimer, Nadine London, Jack Voltaire Toomer, Jean Steinbeck, John Chaucer, Geoffrey Salinger, J. D. Heller, Joseph Williams, Tennessee Vonnegut, Kurt Carver, Raymond Silko, Leslie Marmon Potok, Chaim Dickens, Charles Walker, Alice Paine, Thomas Augustine, Saint Twain, Mark Dostoyevsky, Fyodor Miller, Arthur Paton, Alan James, Henry Dickens, Charles Miller, Arthur Dante Alighieri Emerson, Ralph Waldo Marlowe, Christopher Ibsen, Henrik Byron, George Gordon Byron, Lord Stoker, Bram Cao Xueqin Joyce, James Adams, Henry Austen, Jane Wharton, Edith Bradbury, Ray Poe, Edgar Allan
List of Works Included in This Bookâ•…â•… xix Farewell to Arms, A Farewell to Manzanar Fathers and Sons Fences Fifth Business Fine Balance, A Frankenstein Frogs, The Giver, The Glass Menagerie, The Go Tell It on the Mountain God of Small Things, The Going after Cacciato Golden Notebook, The “Good Man Is Hard to Find, A” “Goophered Grapevine, The” Grapes of Wrath, The Great Expectations Great Gatsby, The Gulliver’s Travels Hamlet Handmaid’s Tale, The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter, The Heart of Darkness Heart of the Matter, The Hedda Gabler Henry IV, Part I Henry V Hiroshima Hobbit, The Hound of the Baskervilles, The House for Mr. Biswas, A House Made of Dawn House of Mirth, The House of the Seven Gables, The House of the Spirits, The House on Mango Street, The How the García Girls Lost Their Accents Iceman Cometh, The I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings Iliad, The Importance of Being Earnest, The Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself In Cold Blood: A True Account of Multiple Murder and Its Consequences Inherit the Wind
Hemingway, Ernest Houston, Jeanne Wakatsuki Turgenev, Ivan Wilson, August Davies, Robertson Mistry, Rohinton Shelley, Mary Aristophanes Lowry, Lois Williams, Tennessee Baldwin, James Roy, Arundhati O’Brien, Tim Lessing, Doris O’Connor, Flannery Chesnutt, Charles W. Steinbeck, John Dickens, Charles Fitzgerald, F. Scott Swift, Jonathan Shakespeare, William Atwood, Margaret McCullers, Carson Conrad, Joseph Greene, Graham Ibsen, Henrik Shakespeare, William Shakespeare, William Hersey, John Tolkien, J. R. R. Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan Naipaul, V. S. Momaday, N. Scott Wharton, Edith Hawthorne, Nathaniel Allende, Isabel Cisneros, Sandra Alvarez, Julia O’Neill, Eugene Angelou, Maya Homer Wilde, Oscar Jacobs, Harriet Capote, Truman Lawrence, Jerome, and Robert E. Lee
xxâ•…â•…
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature
In Memoriam A. H. H. Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African. Written by Himself, The Invisible Man Jane Eyre Joy Luck Club, The Jude the Obscure Julius Caesar Jungle, The Kim King Lear Leaves of Grass Lesson Before Dying, A Life in the Iron Mills Light in August “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey” Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, The Little Women Lolita Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven, The Lonesome Dove Long Day’s Journey into Night Lord Jim Lord of the Flies Lord of the Rings, The “Lottery, The” Love Medicine “Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, The” “Luck of Roaring Camp, The” Lucky Jim Lysistrata Macbeth Madame Bovary Main Street Martian Chronicles, The Medea Member of the Wedding, The Merchant of Venice, The Metamorphosis, The Middleman and Other Stories, The Midnight’s Children Midsummer Night’s Dream, A Misanthrope, The Moby-Dick Modest Proposal, A
Tennyson, Alfred, Lord Equiano, Olaudah Ellison, Ralph Brontë, Charlotte Tan, Amy Hardy, Thomas Shakespeare, William Sinclair, Upton Kipling, Rudyard Shakespeare, William Whitman, Walt Gaines, Ernest J. Davis, Rebecca Harding Faulkner, William Wordsworth, William Lewis, C. S. Alcott, Louisa May Nabokov, Vladimir Alexie, Sherman McMurtry, Larry O’Neill, Eugene Conrad, Joseph Golding, William Tolkien, J. R. R. Jackson, Shirley Erdrich, Louise Eliot, T. S. Harte, Bret Amis, Kingsley Aristophanes Shakespeare, William Flaubert, Gustave Lewis, Sinclair Bradbury, Ray Euripides McCullers, Carson Shakespeare, William Kafka, Franz Mukherjee, Bharati Rushdie, Salman Shakespeare, William Molière Melville, Herman Swift, Jonathan
List of Works Included in This Bookâ•…â•… xxi Moll Flanders Mrs Dalloway Much Ado about Nothing Mumbo Jumbo “Murders in the Rue Morgue, The” My Ántonia “My Last Duchess” Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave. Written by Himself Native Son Natural, The Night Nineteen Eighty-Four North and South Notes on the State of Virginia “Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge, An” Odyssey, The Oedipus the King Of Mice and Men Of Plymouth Plantation Old Man and the Sea, The Oliver Twist One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest One Hundred Years of Solitude On the Road Open Boat, The O Pioneers! Optimist’s Daughter, The Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slave Othello Our Town “Outcasts of Poker Flats, The” Out of Africa Outsiders, The Painted Bird, The Paradise Lost Passage to India, A Pearl, The Picture of Dorian Gray, The Pilgrim’s Progress, The Playboy of the Western World, The poems poems
Defoe, Daniel Woolf, Virginia Shakespeare, William Reed, Ishmael Poe, Edgar Allan Cather, Willa Browning, Robert Rowlandson, Mary Douglass, Frederick Wright, Richard Malamud, Bernard Wiesel, Elie Orwell, George Gaskell, Elizabeth Jefferson, Thomas Bierce, Ambrose Homer Sophocles Steinbeck, John Bradford, William Hemingway, Ernest Dickens, Charles Solzhenitsyn, Alexander Kesey, Ken García Márquez, Gabriel Kerouac, Jack Crane, Stephen Cather, Willa Welty, Eudora Winterson, Jeanette Behn, Aphra Shakespeare, William Wilder, Thornton Harte, Bret Dinesen, Isak Hinton, S. E. Kozinski, Jerzy Milton, John Forster, E. M. Steinbeck, John Wilde, Oscar Bunyan, John Synge, John Millington Dickinson, Emily Frost, Robert
xxiiâ•…â•…
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature poems poems poems poems Poisonwood Bible, The Portrait of a Lady, The Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, A Pride and Prejudice Prince, The Pygmalion Rabbit, Run Rainbow, The Raisin in the Sun, A Rape of the Lock, The “Rappaccini’s Daughter” Red Badge of Courage, The Red Pony, The Remains of the Day, The Remembrance of Things Past “Resistance to Civil Government” “Rime of the Ancient Mariner, The” Robinson Crusoe Romeo and Juliet Room with a View, A “Rose for Emily, A” Salt Eaters, The Scarlet Letter, The Seagull, The “Self-Reliance” Sense and Sensibility Separate Peace, A Siddhartha “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Sister Carrie Six Characters in Search of an Author Sketchbook of Geoffrey Crayon, The Slaughterhouse-Five Small Place, A Song of Solomon Songs of Innocence and of Experience Souls of Black Folk, The Sound and the Fury, The Steppenwolf Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, The Stranger, The Streetcar Named Desire, A Sula Sun Also Rises, The
Hughes, Langston Keats, John Shelley, Percy Bysshe Yeats, William Butler Kingsolver, Barbara James, Henry Joyce, James Austen, Jane Machiavelli, Niccolò Shaw, George Bernard Updike, John Lawrence, D. H. Hansberry, Lorraine Pope, Alexander Hawthorne, Nathaniel Crane, Stephen Steinbeck, John Ishiguro, Kazuo Proust, Marcel Thoreau, Henry David Coleridge, Samuel Taylor Defoe, Daniel Shakespeare, William Forster, E. M. Faulkner, William Bambara, Toni Cade Hawthorne, Nathaniel Chekhov, Anton Emerson, Ralph Waldo Austen, Jane Knowles, John Hesse, Herman Edwards, Jonathan Dreiser, Theodore Pirandello, Luigi Irving, Washington Vonnegut, Kurt Kincaid, Jamaica Morrison, Toni Blake, William DuBois, W. E. B. Faulkner, William Hesse, Herman Stevenson, Robert Louis Camus, Albert Williams, Tennessee Morrison, Toni Hemingway, Ernest
List of Works Included in This Bookâ•…â•… xxiii
Surfacing Tale of Two Cities, A Taming of the Shrew, The Tar Baby Tartuffe “Tell-Tale Heart, The” Tempest, The Tender Is the Night Tess of the d’Urbervilles Their Eyes Were Watching God Things Fall Apart Things They Carried, The Tin Drum, The To Kill a Mockingbird Tom Jones To the Lighthouse Tracks Treasure Island Tree Grows in Brooklyn, A Trifles Tripmaster Monkey: His Fake Book Turn of the Screw, The Twelfth Night Unbearable Lightness of Being, The Uncle Tom’s Cabin Up from Slavery U.S.A. trilogy Vindication of the Rights of Woman, A Waiting for the Barbarians Walden War and Peace Waste Land, The Way to Rainy Mountain, The White Fang White Noise Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ? Wide Sargasso Sea Winesburg, Ohio Wise Blood Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories Woman Warrior, The Women in Love Women of Brewster Place, The World According to Garp, The Wuthering Heights Yellow Wallpaper, The “Young Goodman Brown”
Atwood, Margaret Dickens, Charles Shakespeare, William Morrison, Toni Molière Poe, Edgar Allan Shakespeare, William Fitzgerald, F. Scott Hardy, Thomas Hurston, Zora Neale Achebe, Chinua O’Brien, Tim Grass, Günter Lee, Harper Fielding, Henry Woolf, Virginia Erdrich, Louise Stevenson, Robert Louis Smith, Betty Glaspell, Susan Kingston, Maxine Hong James, Henry Shakespeare, William Kundera, Milan Stowe, Harriet Beecher Washington, Booker T. Dos Passos, John Wollstonecraft, Mary Coetzee, J. M. Thoreau, Henry David Tolstoy, Leo Eliot, T. S. Momaday, N. Scott London, Jack DeLillo, Don Albee, Edward Rhys, Jean Anderson, Sherwood O’Connor, Flannery Cisneros, Sandra Kingston, Maxine Hong Lawrence, D. H. Naylor, Gloria Irving, John Brontë, Emily Gilman, Charlotte Perkins Hawthorne, Nathaniel
INTRODUCTION ` cept, especially for less experienced students) seeks first to enumerate and explain the many different definitions of the word, and then to demonstrate how it might be used in various contexts, thus simplifying a complicated concept. The essay on success (a concept with which students will certainly be familiar) starts by providing a few alternative definitions of success, in order to complicate and enrich an ostensibly simple term. All the essays on themes endeavor to answer the central questions of how the theme has been used and why it has proven so appealing throughout literary history. The second part of the set contains essays on specific themes in more than 300 individual works of literature. Here, the essays are organized in alphabetical order, first by the author of the subject literary work, and then by the title of the work. (An appendix lists all the works covered in the book in alphabetical order.) Each section on a particular work contains a brief introduction to the work and then usually three essays, each on a different literary theme in the work. For instance, for the first work covered in the encyclopedia, Chinua Achebe’s Anthills of the Savannah, we provide essays on the themes of gender, oppression, and social class in Anthills. This format allows students to examine the text from three of its most important vantage points, making connections and understanding details they might not have picked up by reading the text on their own. Each essay is relatively short (750 words) and is intended to provide not a comprehensive
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature is unique among literature references in that it is general and specific. It offers both a survey of literary themes and a number of in-depth analyses of how these themes operate in individual literary works. The first part of this set contains essays on 50 literary themes. Each essay examines a specific theme in a general, accessible, interdisciplinary manner, usually describing how the theme has evolved over time, how it relates to other important themes, and most importantly, why the theme is powerful enough to recur so often in great literature. For example, the essay on abandonment begins with the origin of the word itself; goes on to explain how early literature, such as the Bible and various folktales, treated the theme; and finally discusses occurrences of the theme in more modern literature, such as Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Louise Erdrich’s Love Medicine. (Themes, authors, and titles are set in small capital letters the first time they appear in a particular entry to indicate a cross-reference to an entry on that subject in part 1 or part 2 of the set. Works cross-referenced in the text are discussed under the entries on the writers who wrote them; both the author and the work are set in small caps.) Along the way, the essay explains how various disciplines outside literature view the concept of abandonment and how those views relate to its portrayal in literature. Each essay is structured to fit its subject. For instance, the essay on nationalism (a difficult con-
xxv
xxviâ•…â•…
Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature
examination of the theme in the work but, rather, enough information and context to encourage the reader’s own thoughts on the subject. The essays are also designed to help students think about these works in ways that are both traditional and unexpected. For instance, one might expect a discussion of gender in Bram Stoker’s Dracula; certainly Dracula’s manipulations of Mina and Lucy, and the attempts by Van Helsing and his crew to save them, are fraught with issues of masculinity, femininity, and sexuality, and the essay on gender in Dracula does indeed examine these issues. However, there is also an essay on nationalism in Stoker’s novel, a topic perhaps not so obvious. This essay asks students to think about how the English characters’ assault on Dracula could be seen as an assertion of their “Englishness” and how banishing Dracula is, metaphorically, an imperial act. In selecting themes, we used the Modern Language Association (MLA) Bibliography Database to determine the frequency of common themes in literature. In selecting works entries, we consulted anthologies, study guides, standard reading lists, and available syllabi to determine the most commonly assigned literary works in high school and college classrooms. Most works included here are novels, plays, or longer poems, which are more suited to this type of approach, but we also decided to cover the works of six essential poets: Emily Dickinson, Robert Frost, Langston Hughes, John Keats, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and William Butler Yeats. A few longer poems, such as Robert
Browning’s “My Last Duchess” and William Wordsworth’s “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey,” have also been included on their own. Students will be able to use the set in two different ways. Some will want to research a particular work, such as F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, and will therefore head directly to the three essays on that novel in the second part of the set. After reading each of the individual essays—on the American dream, identity, and social class—they may then turn to part 1 to read more about those three themes and find other examples of great literature that use the same theme, but perhaps in a different way. Other students might want to begin their investigations by reading first about a particular theme. Some might be interested in writing on broader subject, such as childhood, and might want to begin by examining the theme as a whole and then turning to a number of works of literature that features the theme. Or some might simply be searching for a work of literature that addresses a subject that interests them. As a whole, Encyclopedia of Themes in Literature provides an unprecedented amount of information on literary themes, written in language designed to be accessible and appealing to students, yet at the same time challenging enough to encourage them to formulate their own ideas about literature. —Jennifer McClinton-Temple, Editor
part i
Themes A–Z `
abandonment
The origins of the word abandon, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, demonstrate that it has not always had the wholly negative connotations it does today. In the Middle French, for instance, metre à bandon could have meant both “to proscribe” and “to release from proscription.” Thus, the term might apply equally to an outcast shunned from society and to the former outcast being welcomed back. Both are being “abandoned.” One may then abandon one’s child, one’s property, or one’s self. The common thread in these definitions in that there is an active choice being made and that the nature of this choice is absolute. Abandonment is never accidental, and it is never partial—it is deliberate and it is complete. It is, perhaps, these qualities that account for the recurrence of the theme in folklore and mythology, in social science, and in art and literature. In the Bible, Adam and Eve are banished from the Garden of Eden. In being left to their own devices, being forced to provide for themselves, they are, in their eyes at least, being abandoned by God. Abraham casts off his wife’s maidservant Hagar and their son Ishmael, abandoning them to the desert and denying them Ishmael’s birthright. Baby Moses, cast among the bulrushes for his own protection, is abandoned by his biological family into the care of another. Folklore and fairy tales abound with stories of abandonment: Snow White is left alone in
1
the forest; Romulus and Remus, the mythological founders of Rome, are placed in their cradle in the Tiber River; and, of course, Hansel and Gretel are forced from their home and into the lair of a witch. In many foundational stories of abandonment, the abandoned child returns to his or her true family in triumph, either as a leader or having achieved great success in one way or another. This triumph seems to mitigate the trauma of the abandonment, implying that the abandonment resulted in some good and allowing for a happy, or at least a contented, ending. In the case of Moses, for instance, it is his abandonment that saves his life. As the pharaoh has ordered that all male babies born to Hebrews be drowned in the Nile, Moses’s mother hides him in a basket in the river where he would be found (and ultimately adopted) by the Pharoah’s daughter. In the story of Hansel and Gretel, the children return, having killed the witch, to find that their stepmother has died and they may live happily with their father. In other stories, however, the return from abandonment proves tragic. For instance, in Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, perhaps one of the most famous stories of abandonment, Oedipus is abandoned as an infant because it has been prophesized that he will grow up to kill his father, the king of Thebes, and marry his mother, the queen. A servant is ordered to take the baby away and kill him, but the servant cannot carry out the order and leaves the baby at the
2â•…â•…˘2 abandonment 2â•…â•… gates of the royal family of a distant city, Corinth. As a young man, however, Oedipus hears the prophecy as well, thinks that it is in reference to his adoptive Corinthian parents, and flees. Ultimately, the prophecy comes true as he kills his real father, Laius, in self-defense and marries Laius’s widow, Jocasta, his real mother. Jocasta then hangs herself, and Oedipus blinds himself with the pins from her dress. Obviously, in this case, grave tragedy resulted from the child’s abandonment, implying that this fate might have been better avoided by keeping him close. Perhaps abandonment appears so frequently in art and literature because, as some philosophers and psychologists believe, the fear of abandonment begins at birth. Sigmund Freud, the Austrian psychiatrist regarded as the father of modern psychological thought, believed that when we are born, and thus physically separated from our mothers, this trauma becomes a central force in our lives. We must, according to Freud, spend a great deal of our lives coming to terms with this separation, which we internalize as an abandonment. Later psychologists would delve deeper than Freud into the fear of and effect of abandonment on our young psyches. In his highly influential three-volume work Attachment, Separation, and Loss (1973), the British psychologist John Bowlby discusses his decades-long studies of children and their attachment to their caregivers, specifically their mothers. Bowlby notes that infants seek to find their mother when she leaves the room as soon as they are able to crawl. Additionally, the child will follow any familiar adult in lieu of the mother if she is unavailable (200–202). Infants demonstrate distress upon their mother’s impending departure as soon as they are old enough to sense the signs that she is leaving, around six to nine months of age (204). For Bowlby, the infant is exhibiting the innate fear of abandonment, which produces anxiety. The psychologist Yi Fu Tuan calls fear of abandonment a “central childhood fear” and points to the frequent use of the motif in fairy tales as a method of playing on that fear and keeping control of children (Salerno 98). If this abandonment does happen and it is prolonged, the anxiety becomes a part of the infant’s, later the child’s, later the adult’s personality. Yi Fu claims that adult anxiety disorders can be attributed to
specific child-rearing practices; in particular, he says, frequent and regular separations, or even frequent and regular threats of abandonment have huge consequences later in life (Salerno 97). Modern philosophers have also considered the fear of abandonment as a central component to modern consciousness. Soren Kierkegaard, the 19thcentury Danish philosopher, defined modern angst or anxiety as a feeling of looming danger where the source of the threat is unknown. G. W. F. Hegel, a German philosopher of the same era, claimed that the true mark of becoming human is not to desire but to want to be the object of someone else’s desire. Combining these theories, then, and remembering as well Bowlby’s infants, can lead to the theory that humans innately fear being abandoned and that as we grow older, we are consumed by a feeling that we will lose our most prized object: another human being. In other words, we live as adults with a constant fear of being abandoned, and if we were indeed abandoned as children, either actually or metaphorically, this fear can be the source of debilitating anxiety. Twentieth-century philosophers have taken these ideas and demonstrated how the detached, impersonal modern world exacerbates the natural fear of abandonment. The Industrial Revolution— the 19th-century shift from rural, manual labor to automated, technologically advanced work in the Western world—took control of the future out of the hands of the family and placed it in the hands of a stranger. Philosophers such as Theodor Adorno have theorized that this led to the breakdown of the family, as the father figure, who perhaps felt abandoned himself, abandoned his own family in search of strong, authoritarian figures outside the family. The French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, the primary figure in the school of philosophical thought known as existentialism, rejected the very idea that the world is ordered and that human beings can make sense of it. Thus, he argued, we realize that we are alone, abandoned in the world. In literature, we see this crisis of abandonment in the works of many different writers. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, for instance, Victor Frankenstein, the doctor who creates the famous monster, wants only to intellectualize, to think, never to
alienationâ•…â•… ╅╅ 3 emote or to feel. He leaves his loved ones lonely and alone in search of individual, intellectual glory. In turn, he abandons the monster he has created and the creature spends the rest of the novel in search of a connection, resulting in tragic consequences. In Louise Erdrich’s Love Medicine, abandonment is explored on an individual level, as there are several characters who are left alone and helpless, but also on a community level, as the Indian tribes of North America were abandoned by the U.S. government, which had promised to protect and provide for them. This novel convincingly demonstrates why the theme of abandonment is so common in literature. On a personal level, all human beings feel a fear of abandonment stemming from our childhood separations from our parents. Additionally, however, in the modern world, whole communities might live in a general state of abandonment based on that world’s impersonal, disconnected nature. See also Alexie, Sherman: Lone R anger and Tonto Fistf ight in Heaven, The ; Angelou, Maya: I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings; Euripides: Medea; Kingsolver, Barbara: Bean Trees, The; McCullers, Carson: Member of the Wedding, The ; Roy, Arundhati: God of Small Things, The; Silko, Leslie Marmon: Ceremony; Tan, Amy: Joy Luck Club, The. FURTHER READING Bowlby, John. Attachment and Loss. New York: Basic Books, 1973. Salerno, Roger A. Landscapes of Abandonment: Capitalism, Modernity, and Estrangement. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
alienation
Countless literary characters feel painfully alienated from the social institutions that surround them. Some, like Jake Barnes in Ernest Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises, feel alienated from their own communities. Others, like Caddy Compson in William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury, feel alienated from their closer connections, including family members and loved ones. Still others, like Stephen Dedalus in James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, feel alienated by the
religious institutions in which they have been raised; sometimes this type of alienation extends so far that the character or characters feel alienated from God himself. Perhaps the most extreme form of alienation lies in characters such as Meursault in Albert Camus’s The Stranger, who feels alienated from everything with which he comes into contact: his family, his society, and the whole of modern life. The proliferation of literary characters who struggle with alienation is a result of the real-life struggle many human beings have with feeling disconnected from, shunned by, and unrelated to other human beings and the societal institutions that shape and guide us. Alienation is a powerful force, one that moves humans toward the negative impulses of self-pity, vulnerability, and violence, but that can also result in the positive results of deep introspection and intellectual independence. Many would associate alienation primarily with the 20th century and beyond, and indeed, the modernist movement, dated roughly from 1890 to 1950, has as one of its central themes the idea that in the modern era, with its increased reliance on science and technology, and the gradual removal of the individual from rural community into urban isolation, the individual and society are at odds with one another. Modernism explores how our relationships with each other and with social institutions such as the church, school, work, and family have grown weaker, leading us to be increasingly individualistic in our thinking and thus, alienated. In fact, the works listed above are all works in the modernist tradition. In addition to those novels and their alienated characters, modernism produced works such as T. S. Eliot’s “The Wasteland” and “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” both poems that explore at length human beings’ alienation from one another and from the world around them. For example, in “Prufrock,” even though the speaker begins by saying, “Let us go then, you and I” (l. 1), the poem never feels like it is telling the story of a couple, as though the speaker is pretending to be working under the misconception that he is part of a community but is actually quite alone. The “you” has been variously interpreted to refer to the reader, the author, or some missing part of the speaker himself. It is precisely this problem—that the speaker is not
4â•…â•…˘4 alienation 4â•…â•… alone but is clearly disconnected from his companion—that creates the feeling of alienation. Near the end of the poem, the speaker says, “I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each / I do not think that they will sing to me” (ll. 124–125). Again, he is alive and moving through the world, but he is disconnected from it, hearing but not listening. Other 20th-century works explore the general condition of alienation by depicting characters who are cut off from one another despite familial connections or close daily proximity. In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, for instance, the title character, Jay Gatsby, born Jay Gatz, has cut himself off from his past, thus alienating himself from what might be called his natural place in the world. He has done this so that he may infiltrate Daisy Buchanan’s world—a world of wealth, society, and superficiality. Yet despite making this transfer, he remains alienated, as Daisy’s circle see him as foreign and out of place. He yearns to be a part of her world, but he does so because he thinks that is the way to win her love. Because he moves along this route, which is unnatural to him, his attempt is doomed to fail. The modern world Fitzgerald depicts in The Great Gatsby—with its artificial distinctions between West Egg and East Egg; its social caste system that leads Myrtle Wilson to have no more value than an animal; and its monumental Valley of Ashes, an artificial barrier separating the rich and the poor, brought about by capitalism and industrialization—suggests a world that will eventually alienate us all from one another by replacing honesty and emotion with facade and ambition. Although the 20th century is the primary home of literature exploring alienation, the concept is much older. The biblical story of the golden calf, for instance, shows us a populace who are alienated from God and from themselves. In the story, Moses has left the Israelites for 40 days and 40 nights to climb Mount Sinai and receive the Ten Commandments. Because they are disconnected from Moses, they also disconnect from the idea of God and immediately fear that they are alone in the world and need an idol to worship to focus their beliefs. They therefore convince Moses’ brother Aaron to forge a golden calf for them. As Erich Fromm points out, this story shows us how “man is in touch with himself only through
the worship of the idols” (quoted in Khan 196). This story, of course, comes from the Old Testament, before the arrival of Christ. One way to read the New Testament is that the coming of the Messiah saves the world from its state of alienation from God. In fact, in his Epistle to the Ephesians, Paul writes, “Remember that ye were without Christ, beings alien from the Commonwealth of Israel” (Eph 2:12, KJV). This connection, then, is vital for Paul; for him, the alienated being naturally yearns for connection. The idea of alienation would remain chiefly theological for centuries. In Middle English, the word signified a kind of “transfer,” almost as though one owned oneself, and if “aliened” or “alienated,” one was transferring that ownership to someone or something else. This could be active and hostile, as if one was being forced into the transfer, or it could be passive and indifferent, as though one was giving up oneself voluntarily. Beyond transferring one’s will to God, the concept of alienation as we know it today did not exist. However, in the 18th century, the Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau would postulate that alienation involves the giving of oneself freely, and that it benefits the individual by entering him or her into society, by freeing that person from the selfish state in which one serves only oneself. Although this might sound positive, for Rousseau it was the dependence on others whom society facilitates that created all vice. He believed that we must give up our rights and “transfer” them to the community. This creates in humans a state of alienation. In the 19th century, the German philosopher Georg Hegel took up Rousseau’s line of thinking, declaring that humans “live in a world shaped by his work and his knowledge, but it is a world in which man feels himself alien, a world whose laws prevent basic need satisfaction” (qtd. in Khan 26). Hegel is extending Rousseau’s ideas here, arguing that modern man will always feel the struggle between his own individual needs and participation in society, and that the result is a feeling of detachment or estrangement. Hegel centered in on work as a primary agent of this detachment, a move that was echoed in the writing of Karl Marx, who articulated ideas of alienation better than anyone had before and who is still considered one of the most important thinkers on the concept. Marx explained alien-
ambitionâ•…â•… 5 ation as the state that exists when things that should naturally go together are kept apart. Modern work, Marx argued, does this in many ways. The Industrial Revolution created workers who were alienated from their own essential humanity, because they were treated as “machines” as opposed to human beings. Further, they are alienated from one another because there is no social relationship involved in the production of a commodity. They are also alienated from the product they are producing, because it will be sold on the market with no relationship to the human that produced it, and from the act of work itself, because there is no satisfaction or meeting of desire involved. Preindustrial work did not have these attributes, as work was often performed in a family setting, with tangible results and, for many, a clear sense of pride and satisfaction. For Marx, and for many other philosophers of alienation, the farther society moves away from these more “natural” states, the more alienated we will become. See also Albee, Edward; Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?; Bradbury, Ray: Martian Chronicles, The; Carver Raymond: “Cathedral”; Dos Passos, John: U.S.A. trilogy; Fitzgerald, F. Scott: Tender Is the Night; Gaines, Ernest J.: Lesson Before D ying, A; Hesse, Herman: Steppenwolf; Kushner, Tony: Angels in America; McCullers, Carson: Heart Is a Lonely Hunter, The; Miller, Arthur: Crucible, The; Momaday, N. Scott: House Made of Dawn; O’Neill, Eugene: Iceman Cometh, The; Shakespeare, William: Tempest, The; Toumer, Jean: Cane. FURTHER READING Khan, Nasir. Development of the Concept and Theory of Alienation in Marx’s Writings. Oslo, Norway: Solum Forlag, 1995. King James Bible Online. Available online. URL: http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org. Accessed January 22, 2010. Schacht, Richard. Alienation. New York: Doubleday, 1970. Stearns, Peter. From Alienation to Addiction: Modern American Work in a Global Historical Perspective. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm, 2008.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
ambition
“Ambition” is a difficult trait to pin down because it is so human: On the one hand, we want to reward ambition, yet on the other hand, we want to warn against it. Literature, especially, has taken the latter interesting approach to examining ambition; however, the term itself was originally relatively neutral, coming from the Latin ambito or ambitus, meaning “going around, circuit, edge, border.” Initially, this referred to a “going around” in the early Roman republic as a means of collecting votes or of canvassing for various political positions. Over time, however, the word ambition would take on other connotations, such as when the Roman poet Lucretius stated, “Angustum per iter luctantes ambitionis,” referring to ambitious men who were “struggling to press through the narrow way of ambition,” usually in a desire for honor, popularity, and power. It is perhaps because of these very human qualities—to desire love, honor, knowledge, and power—that the theme of ambition has been so prevalent in literature. Whether in Greek mythology or a 20th-century novel such as Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, literature often highlights the consequences of ambition gone awry. The dangers of ambition have been a popular theme not only in literature, but also through religious and mythological texts. In the book of Genesis in the Old Testament, for example, ambition is given much attention. The earliest consequence of ambition occurred when Adam and Eve decided to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge, so that their “eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil” (Gen. 3:5), even though God had warned them that they would die if they ate of the tree. The result of such ambition? Adam and Eve were granted knowledge, but they were banished from the Garden of Eden. Later in Genesis, ambition is once again punished when the Tower of Babel is constructed, so that the people may “build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth” (11:4). The result of the Babylonians’ ambition was exactly what they had built the tower to defend against: God causes them to speak in different languages and to be scattered across the land, resulting in confusion.
6â•…â•… ambition Similarly, in Greek mythology we see the consequences of foolishly following ambition. In his Metamorphoses, Ovid tells the story of Phaethon, the son of the sun god Helios. Phaethon succumbs to his ambition for pride and reputation and brags to his friends that he is the son of Helios. Angered, Phaethon meets with his father and takes advantage of his father’s goodwill, securing permission to drive Helios’s chariot (the sun) for a day. Phaeton’s ambition exceeds his grasp, however, as he loses control of the horses, scorching the earth and turning Africa into a desert. The chariot is so out of control that Zeus is forced to intervene, striking down Phaethon with a lightning bolt. Phaethon was not the only character to “fall” due to his ambition, however. John Milton’s epic poem Paradise Lost tells the story of the fall of man, but also of the fall of Satan. Satan, filled with ambition and pride, wages war against God, thinking to supplant him. Satan is defeated and cast out of heaven; his ambition does not leave him, however, as he quickly decides to bring about “the fall of man” by introducing evil to the world. But beginning with the romantics in the 19th century, the character of Satan was not seen as an antagonist but as a protagonist, celebrated for his flawed but idealistic nature. In his 1932 essay on Dante, T. S. Eliot would refer to the character of Satan as a “Byronic Hero,” strengthening the image from 17th-century Britain to the romantic poets to the modern world. Since ambition is such a human struggle between making choices—and dealing with the consequences that result from these choices—philosophers, psychologists, and academics have been attempting to understand how and why we are driven by ambition. Perhaps one of the earliest examinations came when Plato presented his concept of the “tripartite soul” in Phaedrus (the concept of which he would later refine in The Republic). Plato’s analogy depicts the soul as a charioteer, noble horse, and base horse. Essentially, the charioteer (the individual) is always struggling to keep the two horses in control. In general, these three parts of the soul are taken to represent, respectively, reason, our noble desires (such as honor and courage), and our base or animal desires (such as ambition, lust, greed, avarice, and anger).
In many ways, this way of thinking about human desires and ambitions is quite similar to the model the Austrian psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud proposed in his 1920 essay “Beyond the Pleasure Principle,” in which he argues that the human psyche is divided into three parts: the id, the ego, and the superego. The id represents the human unconscious, amoral desire to be satisfied, whether it is by food, sex, drugs, or power. The ego strives to mediate between the id and the superego—sometimes having to satisfy one or the other; the ego is a conscious attempt to balance primitive desires with a rational need to negotiate the “real world.” The superego essentially functions as an individual’s conscience, reminding him or her what the “real world” views as acceptable and moral—and what it does not; the super-ego is at odds with the potentially ambitious id. Shortly after Freud presented his model for the psyche, human desires—of which ambition is one of the most powerful—found itself being examined through the lens of psychology yet again. If we consider ambition as essentially a form of motivation, a manifestation of desires, then it was the American psychologist Abraham Maslow who, in 1943, first helped contextualize ambition within his “hierarchy of needs.” Within this hierarchy, Maslow argues that humans have several types of needs, ranging from the most basic to the most complex; these needs address physical (hunger, sleep), safety (housing, jobs), social (love, friendship), esteem (achievements, power), and self-actualization (wisdom and enlightenment) desires. Ambition can easily be considered a “desire for esteem,” which nicely aligns with the Oxford English Dictionary’s primary definition of ambition as an “inordinate desire.” No examination of ambition would be complete without considering potentially the most famous literary example of “inordinate desire,” Macbeth. Within William Shakespeare’s play, Macbeth (the central, tragic figure) claims “I have no spur / To prick the side of my intent, but only / Vaulting ambition, which o’erleaps itself / And falls on the other” (1.7.27–30). Macbeth faces an internal struggle between his noble, civilized desires (admirable ambition) and his more savage, primal desires (ambition as a tragic flaw). Perhaps Lady Macbeth
ambitionâ•…â•… 7 presents his struggle best when, pondering her husband’s character, she states: It is too full o’ the milk of human kindness To catch the nearest way. Thou wouldst be great, Art not without ambition, but without, The illness that should accompany it. What thou wouldst highly That wouldst thou holily—wouldst not play false And yet would wrongly win. (1.5.17–22) Macbeth, in order to achieve his goals, gives in to his uncivilized desires and becomes a tragic figure: someone who made the wrong moral choice. Ultimately, this costs him not only the power that he desires but also his life. This trend of identifying ambition as a central character trait—sometimes a strength, sometimes a flaw—proceeded from the Byronic hero of the 19th century to the more modern antihero. Perhaps one of the best examples in modernism of an antihero is the character of Stephen Dedalus in James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Dedalus even goes so far as to compare himself to Satan when he claims “non serviam,” or “I will not serve.” Like the character of Satan, Dedalus desires to be free from accepted constraints—in his case, family, religion, and country. Dedalus desires to be more, to be great. Indeed, at the conclusion of Portrait he presents himself as his namesake (Daedalus). Other modern texts also highlight figures with conflicting desires. In Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, Willie Loman struggles with his failure to achieve what he perceives as the modern, postWorld War II version of the American dream, defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as “the ideal that every citizen of the United States should have an equal opportunity to achieve success and prosperity through hard work, determination, and initiative.” In short, Willie’s ambition was to achieve success through owning his own business and making as much money as possible. But it is Willie’s ambition—or lack thereof—that makes the play an intriguing look at how ambition can affect our lives.
An earlier text, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, revolves around the misunderstanding of the main character, Jay Gatsby, whose business success during the Roaring Twenties was probably caused by his ambition to achieve the American dream, to “do better” than his modest beginnings seemed to allow him to do. Gatsby’s rise in power and acquisition of wealth stand in stark contrast to Willie Loman’s failure to attain any of these things. Both characters, however, seem uncomfortable with their ambition and its consequences, remaining conflicted characters throughout the telling of their respective tales. In Achebe’s Things Fall Apart we are presented with yet another example of a conflicted character and how the consequences of ambition can lead to ruin. In this case, Okonkwo (the main character) struggles with the past and the present, old cultural norms and new cultural norms, as British colonialism introduces itself to his home village in Nigeria, Africa. Okonkwo’s misguided ambition proves to be his downfall, likening Things Fall Apart to some of the Greek tragedies. In modern society and literature, ambition is no longer presented as a human struggle with gods (at least not solely) but as a struggle within the individual. However, while ambition has always been an internal struggle between an “honorable” approach or a “dishonorable” approach to a situation, our modern, globalized world presents new layers to this theme. Individuals no longer struggle only within themselves: They also struggle to understand how their ambition can—and should—be acted upon in a society that has new means of waging warfare, merging cultures, free-market economies, and evolving forms of communication. In such a world, ambition does not always need to be a tragic flaw. After all, without ambition the United States would not have pushed westward, eventually spreading from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. Without ambition, the world would not have achieved spaceflight, prompting new questions and new discoveries. Without ambition, we would not have the wealth of knowledge available to us through the Internet. Without ambition we would not have had the Civil Rights movement. However, without ambition we also would not have had the Holocaust, the Water-
8â•…â•… American dream, the gate scandal, or the stock market crashes of 1987 and 2008. Ambition itself is not a “good thing” or a “bad thing,” but it is a human thing. Ultimately, it is up to individuals, whether through literature, politics, or daily life, to determine how they will use their ambition. See also Aristophanes: Frogs, The; Dreiser, Theodore: American Tragedy, An; Hardy, Thomas: Jude the Obscure; Ishiguro, Kazuo: Remains of the Day, The; James, Henry: Portrait of a Lady, The; Marlowe, Christopher: Doctor Faustus; Plath, Sylvia: Bell Jar, The; Shakespeare, William: Julius Caesar; Shelley, Percy Bysshe: poems; Steinbeck, John: Cannery Row. FURTHER READING King James Bible Online. Available online. URL: http://www.kingjamesbible.org. Accessed January 22, 2010. Maslow, A. H. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50, no. 4 (1943): 370–396.
Stephen Fonash
American dream, the
In his 1931 book The Epic of America, James Truslow Adams coined the phrase the American dream, which is “that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement. It is .╯.╯. a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognized by others for what they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position” (415). Within the whole of the American psyche, there lies an eternal hope that the nation’s citizens will be afforded the opportunity for both monetary growth and social advancement. Of course, hard work and industriousness are embedded within this concept: In the traditional American mindset, any man or woman can achieve whatever he or she wants as long as there is the drive and will to obtain it. Indeed, although “the American dream” was not used by Truslow until 1931, the concept has always been an integral part within the consciousness of Americans. In the 1776 Declaration of Indepen-
dence, Thomas Jefferson laid out what may be the most important and well-known reference to the American dream. The Declaration maintains that “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Along with the other Founding Fathers, Jefferson believed that the United States could and should be a nation giving every opportunity to individual progress and achievement. In contrast to Great Britain and its strict class structure, the United States represented to Jefferson the chance for all Americans, even those with poor economic backgrounds, to become pillars of their communities. To much of the world, Benjamin Franklin, another Founding Father, has come to embody the American dream. In The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin (1793), Franklin states that he arrived in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as a nearpenniless youth. He describes walking down the streets with three bread rolls in his hands—those being all he could afford for dinner—and looking about him in order to gauge his opportunities. The remaining sections of the autobiography chronicle his emergence as one of the most influential men in the then-fledgling American nation. Through his diligence, Franklin transformed himself from a poor teenager into a successful businessman, inventor, and ambassador. He established the first library and first fire station, and he initiated the process of harnessing the power of electricity, so it could later be used for the public good. However, not all depictions of the American dream in literature have been quite so favorable. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s 1925 novel The Great Gatsby depicts the lure of the American dream as being a destructive force rather than a beneficial one. Jay Gatsby, the novel’s main character, believes that if he can move up in society by obtaining as much monetary wealth as possible, then he will be able to achieve the happiness he has always desired. Unlike Franklin, Gatsby is accused of having acquired his money through possibly disreputable means. He does not appear interested in working hard to achieve the luxuries of money; he is instead merely interested in obtaining the end results of actu-
American dream, theâ•…â•… 9 ally possessing it. These materialistic values, which he and the other characters in the novel uphold, serve to produce a general feeling of despondency throughout the text. By the end of the novel, this despondency leads to despair, and the greed that overruns the novel leads to Gatsby’s murder. In a similar vein, Arthur Miller’s 1949 play Death of a Salesman is also critical of the effects the American dream can produce in those who believe wholeheartedly in its monetary promise alone. Like Jay Gatsby, Willy Loman, the play’s protagonist, is obsessed with making money. Rather than finding a job as a physical laborer, which he enjoys, Willy devotes his life to selling. In other words, he devotes himself to the sole task of making money. Throughout the play, Willy experiences flashbacks in which he relives various incidents from his life. He is a constant daydreamer and therefore has a difficult time focusing on the reality of the moment he is currently experiencing. Ultimately, Willy’s obsession with the American dream makes him forget that he has a family who loves him and natural talents that he could employ. In the end, Miller’s depiction of the quest for the American dream is even more somber than is Fitzgerald’s: Willy kills himself, while his son Happy decides to follow along in his father’s footsteps, avenging what he sees as the wrongs society enacted against Willy. At his father’s funeral, Happy asserts: “Willy Loman did not die in vain. He had a good dream. It’s the only dream you can have—to come out number-one man” (2049). This conclusion to the play indicates that Miller believes that what he views as the treacherous myth of the American dream will continually perpetuate itself, relentlessly casting its dark shadow on future generations of young Americans. Yet it can easily be argued that those who feel slighted by the promise of the American dream the most are minority groups—those who have been constantly disenfranchised by the American governmental system and who have been forced to view the hypocrisy they see as inherent within the Dream their entire lives. In his famous 1963 “I Have a Dream” speech, the African-American civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., declared that his hope for the equality of all races in America was one “deeply rooted in the American dream.” King
believed that all Americans should be provided the opportunity to prosper to their fullest potential. Much like King, the Harlem Renaissance poet, Langston Hughes also lamented that minority groups were never given the opportunity to experience the hope the American dream supposedly provides to its nation’s citizens. In “Let America Be America Again,” Hughes juxtaposes the image of what privileged white Americans envision their country to be with his own experience in the country as an African-American citizen, remarking that “America never was America to me” (l. 5). Likewise, in his 1951 poem “Harlem,” Hughes asks the question, “What happens to a dream deferred?” (l. 1), ultimately suggesting that minority groups are denied the realization of their dreams in America. Deciding to mimic some of Hughes’s themes, Lorraine Hansberry adopted one of the lines from “Harlem” as the title to her 1959 play A Raisin in the Sun. Hansberry’s play follows the lives of the Youngers, an African-American family living in 1950s Chicago. In the drama, Lena Younger, the family matriarch, receives insurance money from the death of her husband. She puts a deposit down on a house and gives the rest of it to her son, Walter Lee. Almost predictably, Walter Lee quickly squanders the rest of the money on a “get rich quick” business scheme that fails. After all, as has been shown in many of the prior examples, a driving theme throughout much American literature is that the pursuit of monetary gain above all other factors almost inescapably leads to suffering. Because Lena does at least have the chance to put the money down for the house, the play actually concludes on a somewhat positive note. Though the family expects to experience racial oppression in the white neighborhood to which they are moving, they still decide to proceed with the move and to face that problem together. By the play’s end, then, the family is unified. They have all forgiven Walter, and they have come to realize that appreciating family relationships in the same way that Lena does should construct the basis of a “real” American dream. Further, in his 1993 short story collection, The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistf ight in Heaven, the Native American writer Sherman Alexie shows that, like African Americans, Native Ameri-
10â•…â•… childhood cans experience the idea of the American dream in a unique way. Unlike other minority groups, Native Americans are left out of the American dream because the ideal of white prosperity and “industriousness” led to the destruction and seizing of what was once Indian property and land. Rather than simply being unattainable, the American dream in this case takes on an even more sinister connotation. Overall, whether they realize it or not, the American dream remains a fundamental factor in most Americans’ lives. Self-fulfillment through monetary satisfaction and whether or not that satisfaction was gained through sufficient hard work is constantly debated and discussed in the media, at neighbor’s houses, and over coffee with friends. Literature is just one venue Americans use to determine their own successes and the successes of those around them. Just as Willy Loman passed on his way of viewing the world to his son Happy, the lens that the idea of the American dream provides will continue to sustain itself for countless future generations of American citizens. See also Alcott, Louisa May: Little Women; Alvarez, Julia: How the García Girls Lost Their Accents; Cisneros, Sandra: House on Mango Street, The; Dreiser, Theodore: American Tragedy, An; Hinton, S. E.: Outsiders, The; Kerouac, Jack: On the Road; Naylor, Gloria: Women of Brewster Place, The; O’Neill, Eugene: Iceman Cometh, The; Sinclair, Upton: Jungle, The; Steinbeck, John: Of Mice and Men. FURTHER READING Adams, James Truslow. The Epic of America. Baltimore, Md.: Simon Publications, 2001. Brown, Lloyd W. “The American Dream and the Legacy of Revolution in the Poetry of Langston Hughes.” Studies in Black Literature 7 (Spring 1976): 16–18. Greenbie, Marjorie Barstow. American Saga: The History and Literature of the American Dream of a Better Life. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1939. Miller, Arthur. Death of a Salesman. In Norton Anthology of American Literature. 4th ed. Vol. 2, edited by Ronald Gottesman and Laurence B. Holland. New York: Norton, 1994, 1995, 2,048.
LuElla Putnam
childhood
In 1960, the French historian Philippe Ariès advanced the hypothesis that the idea of childhood was practically nonexistent before the early modern period. The controversy about the existence or absence of the idea prior to that time in history gave rise to a host of studies on childhood. But what does the word childhood mean? Our awareness that it refers to a distinct period of human life is natural, but how do we determine its duration? How long does childhood last? Many psychologists and specialists in children’s studies conclude that childhood is an endlessly complex term. All have agreed that it refers to a set of experiences and behaviors, characteristic for the earlier part of our lives, meant to prepare us for adulthood and active life. As to its duration, individual differences should be taken into account. In this sense, childhood is defined in opposition to adulthood: One is no longer a child when one becomes an adult. However, this theory has not sufficed, and the growth of research on the subject is telling. The common denominator of many studies on childhood is the attempt to grasp its essence, to define the experience of being a child and to explain the nature of children. One of the most important conclusions these studies have drawn is that our notions of childhood have changed. They have adapted themselves to society and to its conception of what a child should be. Thus, the ideas about childhood during the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries evolved continually. Writing and literature tell us more about this evolution. Childhood has for long been one of the central themes of English literature. Children were the subject of a great number of Elizabethan lyrics, and we can find them in the works of Dryden and Pope. However, childhood as a truly substantial theme arose with the novel, and its importance gradually increased through the 18th century. Later on, the theme developed and matured, and we can easily find its numerous ramifications in the literature of the 19th century as well as the 20th. Today, it is seen as essential for the critical understanding of the literary production of the 19th century and the Victorian period. In addition, the 19th and 20th centuries saw the steady emergence of a real literature for children, either for their instruction or entertain-
childhoodâ•…â•… 11 ment. Thus, the child has been either the subject or the object of a plethora of writings since the 18th century. These writings reflect the dichotomy of childhood, which was seen as a symbol of growth and development on the one hand and as a symbol of regression and ignorance of the world on the other. Authors such as James Janeway (A Token for Children, 1671–72) spread the doctrine of original sin during the 17th century and constructed highly moralizing, religion-oriented visions of childhood. All of these were based on the theory of the Christian “fallen state” and looked upon children with pessimism. Childhood was seen as the most decisive period for the acquisition of the fundamentals of spirituality and for the construction of true faith. However, the thinkers of the 18th century promoted reason as one of the highest virtues. The century became a period of transition, of which childhood was the supreme symbol, celebrating the cult of nature, the purity of mind and soul, and the triumph of innate goodness. Contrary to what was professed in earlier centuries, childhood was perceived in an increasingly positive light. Soon it became a favorite theme of the sentimental novel, and the poverty and misfortunes of guiltless, insightful, and virtuous children were an object of considerable import and frequent discussion in the works of many women writers (for example, Elizabeth Bonhote’s Hortensia; or, The Distressed Wife, 1769). The period saw the emergence of the idea that in childhood, the concepts of imagination, sensibility, and nature were joined in one. The influence of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and his Émile (1762) on this representation of childhood in the literature of the times is undeniable. But sentimentality was not reserved to the 18th century only, and in her early novels, George Eliot molded childhood according to the same principles. Her children were portrayed as carefree and unencumbered with adult sorrow and the awareness of death. An interesting peculiarity of her work is the attention Eliot pays to baby-talk and children’s ways of talking. For William Blake (e.g., Songs of Innocence, 1789) and William Wordsworth (e.g., “Ode on Intimations of Immortality from Recollections of Early Childhood,” 1807, or “We Are Seven,” 1798), the child became a theme of a certain weight. For
Blake, childhood signified innocence; for Wordsworth, the child had natural piety and wisdom, and his famous line “The Child is father of the Man” (“My Heart Leaps Up,” 1802) became an increasingly popular motif. The child and the process of growing up were common metaphors for the regeneration and renewal of society, while childhood was seen as the equivalent of humanity in its infancy. Gradually, children became symbols of hope and childhood synonymous to new beginnings. Such was the case in Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations (1860–61). The child in Dickens grew to be the incarnation of spontaneity, love, and innocence on the background of the ugliness, squalor and inhumanity of industrial London. Dickens offered his readers a view through the child’s eyes, creating a palpable experience of childhood. Indeed, many of his novels bear the names of children—Oliver Twist (1837–39), Nicholas Nickleby (1838–39), Dombey and Son (1846–48), David Copperf ield (1849–50), Little Dorrit (1855–57). Charlotte Brontë in Jane Eyre (1847) explored the victimization, loneliness, and isolation of children within a hostile environment. Virtually deprived of childhood, the girls at the Lowood school for poor and orphaned children are vowed to a life of slavery and an early death. Jane Eyre fed on a strong heritage of gothic villainy and persecuted femininity to denounce the rigid education and brutal practices of the schooling system. While Brontë chose to give the reader an account of the negative effects a difficult childhood might have on an adult’s life, Henry James focused some of his writings on children exclusively. James was mostly concerned with the innocence of childhood and how this innocence can be corrupted if the family circle is unbalanced. The major themes of both What Maisie Knew (1897) and The Turn of the Screw (1898) are knowledge and ignorance, and they explore a number of problematic Freudian concepts, among which are children’s exposure to sexuality and early contact with death. During the second half of the 19th century, Lewis Carroll was one of the authors who wrote extensively for and about children. His Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865), Through the Looking-Glass (1871) and Sylvie and Bruno (1889–93)
12â•…â•… coming of age were specifically produced for an audience of children and even their cover art was conceived in such a way as to please children. Carroll’s correspondence with his editors is one of the numerous testimonials that a real concern about children and childhood had developed. Moreover, Carroll’s writings contain a great deal of information about what it meant to be a British child during the Victorian period. Laden with political implications and comments on the British Empire, Alice’s world places a heavy burden on the shoulders of its youngest subjects whose childhood is to prepare them for servitude. Almost at the same time in America, Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Tom Sawyer (1876) and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884) appear as stories of childhood escape, of willful isolation from society and a continual struggle against conformity. In line with the tradition of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s portrayal of children (Uncle Tom’s Cabin, 1852), Twain’s works discuss freedom and liberty in a reaction against the limits and constraints of society. All of these are themes that echo William Blake’s natural, joyful, carefree, and enlightened romantic child. During the 20th century, childhood developed into a favorite theme for an ever-increasing number of genres. The examples vary extensively, from C. S. Lewis’s indirect portrayals of children at times of war to the poems, diaries, and writings by children (e.g., Anne Frank: The Diary of A Young Girl, 1947) and children writing of the various experiences of their own childhood. While in earlier centuries childhood was a preparation and a period of growing up, the early 19th and 20th centuries saw the rise of the idea of holding on to childhood with authors such as J. M. Barrie (Peter Pan, 1902–06) and Ray Bradbury (Dandelion Wine, 1957; Farewell Summer, 2006). They represented the magic, wonders, and transience of childhood. The scope for the study of childhood in literature is wide indeed. Today, researchers are asking more questions. They are discussing problems that had never been looked into before, and their work has uncovered a remarkable variety in the portrayal of children and childhood in literature, beyond the fundamental polarities of the good and the bad child. Studies, among which are those of Jacqueline Banerjee, Andrea Immel, and Michael Witmore,
have shown that childhood stands at the heart of many works of literature from which it was initially thought absent. Thus, from the 20th century onwards, there has been a global and unprecedented interest in childhood. See also Augustine, Saint: Confessions of St. Augustine; Lee, Harper: To Kill a Mockingbird; Morrison, Toni: Beloved; Tolstoy, Leo: War and Peace; Winterson, Jeanette: Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit. FURTHER READING Ariès, Philippe. Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life. New York: Vintage Books, 1962. Banerjee, Jacqueline. Through the Northern Gate: Childhood and Growing Up in British Fiction, 1719–1901. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 1996. Coveney, Peter. The Image of Childhood: The Individual and Society: a Study of the Theme in English Literature. London: Penguin Books, 1967. Cunningham, Hugh. Children and Childhood in Western Society since 1500. London: Longman, 1995. Immel, Andrea, and Michael Witmore, eds. Childhood and Children’s Books in Early Modern Europe, 1550– 1800. New York and London: Routledge, 2006. Pollock, Linda A. Forgotten Children: Parent-Child Relations from 1500 to 1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Margarita Georgieva
coming of age
Most scholars agree on a standard definition of the coming-of-age narrative: Simply put, it follows the development of a child or adolescent into adulthood. The roots of this narrative theme can be traced back to the bildungsroman, or “formation novel.” Late 18th-century German novels, such as Johann Goethe’s Wilhelm Meister’s Apprenticeship (1795), established a narrative pattern that would be followed by several other authors in the forthcoming centuries. This pattern typically features a young protagonist—either male or female—who undergoes a troubled search for an adult identity by process of trials, experiences, and revelations. This theme is prominent in several well-known European and American novels of the 19th and early 20th centuries, such as Charles Dickens’s David
coming of ageâ•…â•… 13 Copperf ield (1849–50) and Great Expectations (1860–61); Horatio Alger, Jr.’s Ragged Dick; or, Street Life in New York with the Bootblacks (1868); Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women (1869); Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884); James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916); and J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye (1951). The popularity of this narrative has continued into the late 20th and early 21st centuries, as shown in critically acclaimed books such as Dorothy Allison’s Bastard Out of Carolina (1993) and Jon Krakauer’s 1996 account of the life and death of Chris McCandless in Into the Wild, and through popular culture texts, such as J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series. While there is agreement on a standard working definition of a coming-of-age narrative, there is little agreement among scholars on the constituent elements of these narratives. James Hardin, a theorist of genre studies, argues that there can be no agreement about the elements of a coming-ofage narrative because of the various meanings of the word Bildung in German. While most scholars interpret the word’s meaning as “formation,” Hardin contends that this interpretation is unique to a series of 18th- and 19th-century novels, and to use that term and its meaning for an examination of 20thand 21st-century novels is to take it out of its proper context. Other interpretations of the German word Bildung, such as initiation, education, and building, have served to further complicate understanding of the coming-of-age narrative. In addition to a debate over the origin of the term, other scholars argue over the age group of protagonists coming of age in these texts. Most 18th- and 19th-century protagonists featured in these novels came of age in their midto-late teenage years. Throughout the 20th century, however, the range in years for a coming-of-age narrative widened from this age group to include protagonists in their early to mid-20s. It is for this reason that the genre studies scholar Barbara White limits the definition of a coming-of-age narrative to focus on protagonists between the ages of 12 and 19. Additionally, in the latter part of the 20th century, the works of anthropologists, such as Arnold van Gennup and Margaret Mead, have added to the debate over the elements of a coming-of-age
narrative. Through their research in rites of passage and social development and structure, the works of anthropologists such as van Gennup and Mead allow scholars to examine the sociocultural implications of these narratives. It is the sociocultural implications that cause the most debate among scholars. Indeed, since a coming-of-age narrative is dependent on a quest for an adult identity, this narrative is closely linked to other areas of identity development, such as gender, race, social class, and national identity (see nationalism). As Kenneth Millard argues, a recurring element of the coming-of-age narrative is the way in which a protagonist’s adult identity is framed by historical events and points of origin and conditioned by social obligations and expectations. Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn serves as an example of this theory. In the novel, a young Huck accompanies Jim, a runaway slave, on a trip down the Mississippi River to reach the free North. The novel’s climax occurs when Jim is caught by slave catchers, and Huck must make a decision between informing Miss Watson, Jim’s owner, about Jim’s location or attempting to free Jim from his bondage. In his decision, Huck must balance the social obligation of returning “property” to its rightful owner and his own conscience—during his trip, Huck has come to see Jim not as a piece of property but as a human. Ironically, Huck makes the decision to “go to hell” by following his conscience, attempting to free Jim from his captivity. Twain’s novel, of course, was published after the institution of slavery was abolished, but it serves as a historical point of reference, as Finn would have grown up in pre-Civil War America. Huck Finn’s adult identity is framed within these racist confines; although African Americans were free, they still were considered as inferior to whites. Thus, the socially acceptable and expected thing for Huck to do would be to turn Jim in to Miss Watson, and it is the deviation from this expectation that Huck believes will condemn his soul. The Huck Finn example also serves as a way to highlight three additional features of the comingof-age narrative. One of these features is the loss of childhood innocence. In Twain’s novel, although Huck naïvely misunderstands the consequences of his decision, his naïveté speaks volumes to readers.
14â•…â•… coming of age The consequence of his decision marks his transition from childhood to adulthood. Prior to the novel’s climax, Huck has been witness to the darker side of the adult world—from his father’s racist diatribe about the voting rights of recently freed slaves to a long and bloody family feud to the con artistry of the Duke and Dauphin. Unbeknownst to Huck—but abundantly clear to the novel’s readers—is the influence that these events have on his decision to attempt to free Jim—the first adult decision of his life. Because of his experiences and this decision, Huck realizes that he may be outcast from his society, as he has deviated from its expected adult norms, and he will no longer be able to go back to live his previous lifestyle of barefooted, pipesmoking truancy. This deviation from expected norms highlights another feature of the coming-of-age narrative: the realization of social expectations and norms. To once again use the Huck Finn example, Huck fully realizes the implications of his decision: He considers himself damned and acknowledges that he will be unable to fully participate in the adult world because of this violation. As such, he is able to recognize the social, adult world now laid out before him. While this realization further distances Huck from his childhood innocence, it also presents him with a choice: Either accept this adult world and conform to its norms and standards or decide on self-exile. Huckleberry Finn, of course, chooses the latter, as he decides to light out for the territories of the American West rather than conform to the rigid social obligations demanded by pre–Civil War rural Missouri. Huck’s choice to light out for the territories highlights a third feature of the coming-of-age narrative. His decision to leave is rooted in another choice: to accept a socially constructed identity, or to construct a personal sense of identity for oneself. While this idea is one of the oldest and most common themes of literature, when examined through the lens of a coming-of-age narrative, it takes on additional weight. Not all coming-of-age protagonists are as fortunate as Huck Finn, though. For some, their gender, race, and class serve as impediments to a sense of freedom. As the feminist scholar Rachel
Blau DuPlessis observes, most 19th-century female protagonists have two options presented before them when coming of age: marriage, the socially acceptable option for young women; or death, the end result for those young women who deviate from socially expected norms. Indeed, constraining one’s identity to social norms and expectations is the choice for one of 19th-century America’s most wellknown female protagonists, Jo March. In Alcott’s Little Women, the creative and headstrong Jo winds up married by the novel’s end. Race and class also serve as factors in these narratives. The unnamed narrator of Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man (1952) comes to realize his situation very early on in the novel. After the narrator, a promising young African-American student, agrees to show a white benefactor the poor living conditions of sharecroppers living around the narrator’s college, he is expelled from school and is forced to decide between accepting society’s roles for an African-American man or developing his own identity. Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild features the real-life story of Chris McCandless, a college graduate from a well-to-do East Coast family. When McCandless realizes the limitations of the options set before him—continued graduate studies, a position in a well-paying job in the business world—he renounces his previous materialistic life and sets off on the roads of America in an attempt to discover who he truly is. National character is also an important factor in coming-of-age narratives. Some preeminent American literature scholars, such as Leslie Fiedler, Ihab Hassan, and R. W. B Lewis, have argued that the coming-of-age narrative is one of the most dominant narratives in American literature. For these scholars, a sense of history, or lack thereof, is key to their view of the importance of the coming-of-age narrative in American literature. At the heart of this contention is the argument that the American national identity shares several key characteristics with the coming-of-age narrative. The first of these characteristics is Lewis’s argument that the American national character is primarily based on renewal and innocence. His theory of the American Adam states that American culture is constantly going back to beginnings and new starts, an attempt to
commodification/commercializationâ•…â•… 15 revert to a lost childhood or return to a forgotten Eden. This theory, according to Lewis, is at the center of most American literature—a constant return to youth, with an emphasis on the experiences, revelations, and trials inherent in a coming-of-age narrative. Thus, in a sense, the focus on coming of age in American literature and in the national character can be argued as an unwillingness to acknowledge history: All events are subject to change and to reinterpretation, a kind of automatic “redo” where each generation must begin its task of the coming of age process. Like Lewis, Ihab Hassan sees the idea of innocence as a conscious denial of American history, but he contends that the denial is also firmly rooted in political ideology. The focus on a wide-eyed, naive innocence of each generation defining itself is not just a literary trope for Hassan; rather, it is deeply enmeshed in an ideology that offers no roots, no genealogies, and no sense of a permanent and static identity. For Leslie Fiedler, this focus on coming-ofage narratives underscores the preoccupation with youth found in American culture. Fiedler argues that this desire to return to a childlike, Edenic state is predicated on the idea that the American national character is constantly fluid and dynamic, youthful and energetic. To allow the national character to grow static and permanent would force American culture to grow old, and perhaps grow up. The coming-of-age narrative is quite simple to define; however, the implications of that definition are numerous and wide-ranging. What began as a way to fictionalize how a child became an adult became complicated throughout the centuries by other issues. Race, class, and gender all play a pivotal role in how a youth is expected to grow into an adult in various societies. Furthermore, the acceptance or rejection of social obligations and duties is another factor in how teens grow into adults. All of these factors expand a relatively benign textbook definition into a wide-ranging, thoroughly complex theme. See also Anaya, Rudolfo: Bless Me, Ultima; Anderson, Sherwood: Winesburg, Ohio; Austen, Jane: Emma; Chopin, Kate: Awakening, The; Crane, Stephen: Red Badge of Courage, The; Kincaid, Jamaica: Annie John; Knowles, John: Separate Peace, A; Marshall, Paule
Brown Girl, Brownstone; McCarthy, Cormac: All the Pretty Horses; McCullers, Carson: Member of the Wedding, The; Shakespeare, William: Henry IV, Part I; Steinbeck, John: Red Pony, The; Stevenson, Robert Louis: Treasure Island; Tolkien, J. R. R.: Hobbit, The; Updike, John: “A & P.” FURTHER READING Du Plessis, Rachel Blau. Writing Beyond the Ending: Narrative Strategies of Twentieth-Century Women Writers. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985. Fiedler, Leslie A. An End to Innocence: Essays and Culture and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press, 1955. Hardin, James, ed. Reflection and Action: Essays on the Bildungsroman. Columbia: South Carolina University Press, 1991. Hassan, Ihab. Radical Innocence: Studies in the Contemporary American Novel. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1965. Lewis, R. W. B. The American Adam: Innocence, Tragedy, and Tradition in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1955. Millard, Kenneth. Coming of Age in Contemporary American Fiction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007. White, Barbara. Growing Up Female: Adolescent Girlhood in American Fiction. Westwood, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1985.
Daniel G. Jones
commodification/commercialization
Commodification is a multifaceted concept, having roots in political and economic theory as well as cultural and literary studies. Broadly defined, commodification is the transformation of immaterial, social relationships into commercial relationships that often utilize the language and ideological stances of a market driven economy and capitalist society (for example, terms and ideas surrounding “buying and selling,” “supply and demand”). In order to understand this important and complex idea, we need to understand the etymology of the word commodification. At the root of the word is commodity, which in modern language usage is defined as “a kind of thing for use of sale, an article of commerce, an object of
16â•…â•… commodification/commercialization trade” and “food or raw materials as objects of trade” (Oxford English Dictionary). The act of trading one good for another is an ancient one, and the act of using currency to purchase a grown or manufactured good is almost as ancient. The act of commodification (sometimes referred to as commoditization) is significant, then, because it is a modern metamorphosis of an ancient idea. Today, it is not only grown and manufactured goods that can be bought and sold: Ideas, social relationships, even individuals can now be viewed as commodities—goods available for trade or purchase. Commodification, in effect, turns people and ideas into goods and machines. The idea of commodification was first broadly explored when, in the Communist Manifesto (1848), Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, noted that everything—not merely food, clothing, and other tangible goods—can become a commodity in a modern, industrial, capitalistic society. It is important to remember, however, that a commodity derives its value not from what it can do (use value) but from what it can be sold or traded for (exchange value), often in order to attain some sort of perceived cultural prestige or social status or identity. To Marx and Engels, people (more specifically, the modern working class), as well as the goods they produce, have become commodities themselves, since people “live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labor increases capital.” In other words, industrialization has increased the amount of commodities that can be produced (and often increased their exchange value as well), but the machine cannot run without the human being. However, the commodity costs money to produce, and so it must always be sold at a set minimum price. The human being, though, has no set minimum price, requiring only “the means of subsistence that he requires for maintenance, and for the propagation of his race.” As a result, the laborer himself becomes a commodity in that his wage is tied to his use in producing the original good. In other words, the “worth” of the laborer is directly associated to the worth of the good (and the exchange value of the laborer is nearly always lower than the exchange value of the good).
However, more and more the workers are separated from the means of production: Workers in a capitalistic society often have no connection to the commodity they are producing; the commodity will often not be purchased or utilized by the laborer’s own community. Rather, they work for a company that is not connected to their community, producing commodities that have no relationship to them, by using machines that they merely operate. Eventually, this leads to the Marxist concept of alienation, in which laborers feels disconnected from their own work, from what they produce, and ultimately from other human beings in their community (since the product of their work is purchased by others and made by machines). The idea of alienation is important to understanding commodification because it deflects the focus of production from the human being, making him a minor part of the process. When this happens, goods can take on a life of their own, almost seeming to appear magically on the shelf of a store, where someone will purchase the good, often without having any idea where, how, or by whom it was made. The process of production (including the human factor) is hidden, and the commodity itself appears as a “natural object,” as if its existence is a matter of natural means, as opposed to manufactured means. When this occurs, it is often referred to as “commodity fetishism” (Marx, Capital) or “reification” (Lukács, History and Class Consciousness), within which the material world is viewed as objectified and out of society’s control; the primary human actions in a reified world are those of buying and selling. In recent years, the concepts of commodification and reification have been analyzed within the sphere of popular culture. For example, theorists such as Theodore Adorno and Max Horkheimer (1944) have identified the emergence of “the culture industry,” which views popular culture as a “factory,” mass-producing goods for society’s consumption. This easy consumption of goods—being a “good consumer” in a capitalistic society—results in satisfying a perceived need for “culture,” and that being able to purchase and thereby participate in this culture will therefore create happy citizens.
commodification/commercializationâ•…â•… 17 A criticism of such a relationship, however, is that the culture industry does not accurately reflect true human needs; instead, it creates false needs—to own certain goods in order to belong as a functioning member of society—as opposed to fulfilling “true” human needs such as liberty, creativity, and community. In other words, the culture industry creates a commodity that it sells to society as a “need” (often through the effects of advertising); society purchases the commodity, which minimizes identity and creates new, similar needs for newer, similar goods. Along the way, the human aspect of society’s consumption is weakened, and culture itself becomes commodified, creating a “culture industry.” The need and the way of belonging and having identity in a culture industry is through ownership and image. Anything, it seems, can be commodified: art, music, footwear, ideas, “beauty,” human relationships, even dreams and ideas. The use value of the good becomes obscured, and the culturally manufactured exchange value is what compels the consumer to buy a Degas painting, an original pressing of The Beatles’ White Album, copyright a new idea or way of doing something, sell cosmetic surgeries and “fad diets,” participate in human trafficking, and even corrupt (or change) the American dream. Literature has long been society’s way of taking a close look at itself, and many literary works have taken a long, hard look at commodification and its related process, commercialization. Perhaps the most significant work to examine how something immaterial and human can be changed into a commodity—something to be purchased, or something that has an exchange value greater than its use value—is Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller. In Death of a Salesman, the Loman family is struggling to find its identity and place in mid20th-century America. This struggle, however, is compounded by modern society’s generally uncaring attitude, best exemplified by Willy Loman’s heartless and dramatic firing by Mr. Wagner, and its obsession with material possessions and social status. While each character in the play is complicit in the commodification of the American dream, none exhibits it better than Willy Loman, who commodifies his personal image, especially in his perpetual desire to be “well liked” and his valuing of labels. For
example, he believes a punching bag to be of good quality because “It’s got Gene Tunney’s signature on it!” (1.1). Willy’s willing participation in the culture industry will not allow him to separate real, human needs from the reified, manufactured image of the American dream—in Willy Loman’s case, to be a successful, well-liked, and influential salesman. In a similar vein, in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, Jay Gatsby’s pursuit of an idealized, successful image of himself—in short, the commodified version of the American dream—led him to a lifelong pursuit of buying an image and a reputation. Yes, Gatsby is a “self-made man,” part of the American dream mythos, but he is a self-made man who places greater exchange value on things and ideas than he should, and conversely, he places little value upon human friendships. The “pursuit of happiness” in Gatsby devolves largely into a pursuit of quick, greedy, superficial moments of happiness. It is money, possessions, and reputation—as well as being part of a social group (being invited to one of Gatsby’s parties, for example) that stand in as “needs,” not the traditional American dream ideas of rugged individualism, human connection, or liberty. Jay Gatsby, however, was not the only character to buy into the commodified American dream being produced by the early culture industry. Daisy, in how she views herself and how she is viewed by others, also acts as a commodity within The Great Gatsby. Daisy, married to her husband, Tom, but in love with Jay Gatsby, is a bright and progressive woman. However, in the commodified world of the Roaring Twenties, within which Gatsby is set, it is easier for her to “buy into” the image of the woman upon whom society has placed value: simple, fun, and beautiful. Putting such an exchange value on the image and role of a woman in this society has the consequences of Daisy wishing the following for her baby girl: “I hope she’ll be a fool—that’s the best thing a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool” (Fitzgerald 12). Daisy hopes that her daughter will be “marketable,” and valued for her successful image within the society of Gatsby. But Daisy is not the only character commodifying women. Daisy’s husband, Tom, views her as a possession rather than as a human being—as he does many women in the novel, even having an affair, not out of love but out
18â•…â•… commodification/commercialization of exchange value. For Tom, women are merely something to be “owned.” In a different yet similar manner, Jay Gatsby also views Daisy as a commodity. While both Miller and Fitzgerald examined the commodification of ideas and ideals, Don DeLillo focuses not only on ideas, but also provides a strong critique of the culture industry in his postmodern novel White Noise. Within this novel, DeLillo examines modern suburban life. From the opening paragraph, the reader is bombarded with lists of goods being moved into college dormitories: “stereo sets, radios, personal computers; small refrigerators and table ranges; the cartons of phonograph records and cassettes; the hair dryers and styling irons; the tennis rackets, soccer balls, hockey and lacrosse sticks, bows and arrows; the controlled substances, the birth control pills and devices; the junk food still in shopping bags—onion-and-garlic chips, nacho thins, peanut creme patties, Waffelos and Kabooms, fruit chews and toffee popcorn; the Dum-Dum pops, the Mystic mints” (1). By presenting us with such an exhaustive list, we are immediately submerged into a materialist and image-conscious society—a society that has a department of Hitler Studies, taught by Jack Gladney, a professor who does not speak German and who is helping a friend establish a department of Elvis Studies; a society where the children are often more mature than the adults, where drugs are exchanged for sex, where the rearrangement of the supermarket is profoundly disorienting to the people of the community, and where the omnipresent television chatters in the background. Other literary works address commodification in different and interesting ways. Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, for example, asks about the relationship between the use value and the exchange value of books and knowledge. In Catch-22, Joseph Heller presents an absurdist narrative of war within which soldiers and prostitutes alike are viewed as disposable commodities. In Beloved, Toni Morrison examines how human beings can be commodified, largely through the portrayal of characters who were born into slavery and who are not viewed as subjects but as objects or commodities. A good example of self-commodification can be seen in the character of Joshua, who changes his
name to Stamp Paid after he “handed his wife over to his master’s son” (124) in order to “buy” his life, and later his freedom. Stamp Paid spends the rest of the novel questioning notions of identity, obligation, and community. Commodification and the culture industry are part of modern-day society; they are built into our political, economic, and entertainment industries. While commodification can be difficult to identify, it is worthwhile to consider its role in everyday life. How does commodification change (for better or worse) how we see the world? How does it change how we view ideas and products? Most important, how does it change how we view each other? Literature, it seems, remains one of our best means of asking—and answering—these questions. See also Defoe, Daniel: Moll Flanders; Dinesen, Isak: Out of Africa; Erdrich, Louise: Bingo Palace, The; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: House of the Seven Gables, The; Huxley, Aldous: Brave New World; Kincaid, Jamaica Small Place, A; Kingston, Maxine Hong: Tripmaster Monkey: His Fake Book; Lawrence D. H.: Rainbow, The; Women in Love; Melville, Herman: “Bartleby the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street”; O’Connor, Flannery: Wise Blood; Pope, Alexander: Rape of the Lock, The; Roy, Arundhati: God of Small Things, The; Steinbeck, John: Grapes of Wrath, The; Swift, Jonathan: Modest Proposal, A; Tolkien, J. R. R.: Hobbit, The; Twain, Mark: Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, A; Updike, John: “A & P”; Wharton, Edith: House of Mirth. FURTHER READING DeLillo, Don. White Noise. New York: Penguin, 1984, 1985. Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. New York: Scribner, 1999. Lukács, Georg. History and Class Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1979. Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. Center for Digital Discourse and Culture. Available online. URL: http://eprints. cddc.vt.edu/Marxists/archive/marx/works/1848/ communist-manifesto/ch01.htm. Accessed January 22, 2010. Morrison, Toni. Beloved. New York: Knopf, 1987.
communityâ•…â•… 19 Tyson, Louis. Psychological Politics of the American Dream: The Commodification of Subjectivity in Twentieth-Century American Literature. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1994.
Steven Fonash
community
Community is an oft-invoked, seemingly simple term that has widely varying historical and current meanings dependent on sociocultural and discipline-specific contexts. As such, its meanings differ between everyday discourse and the specialized terrain of scientific, technological, and sociological discourse. Today, the fundamental notions of community are undergoing a sea change because of the emergence of new communication technologies, access to the Internet, and the formation of different kinds of Web-based communities that have paradoxically both expanded as well as made more intimate the connections between people. Blogospheres, chat rooms, Web sites such as YouTube and MySpace, and other such new avenues of expression in cyberspace have democratized and made the world more intimate in ways never imagined before. Local communities have been revived even as cyber-technology has been accused of destroying traditional bonds of community life. In its most commonly understood sense, community implies networks of solidarity and connection that attest to a primary instinctual need of humans beings as social animals. Community is thus an important source of meaning and validation in human lives and is predicated on a set of commonly held beliefs, values, interests, knowledge and information, and interpretive frameworks deemed as good by those who belong to the community. A sense of belonging to a collective is an integral aspect of community, and this sense of belonging may be located in a series of things, whether it be a common cultural heritage, religion, language, rituals, race, ethnicity, nation, or geographical territory. Indeed, a nation is merely a larger political form of community. In James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, the young Stephen Dedalus inscribes his name in his geography book followed by a series of addresses that locate him in a chain of increasingly wider personal and community
networks: “Stephen Dedalus, Class of Elements, Clongowes College, Sallins, County Kildare, Ireland, Europe, the World, the Universe” (24). Here the widening circle of belonging extending from his class, college, county, country, and continent to the very universe itself traces Stephen’s expanding notion of self entrenched in a chain of being that ties the individual to the community. In 1887, German sociologist Ferdinand Tonnies, in his book Community and Civil Society, developed the distinction between community—which he said is informal and ethically oriented, with mutual bonds of a traditional communal life—and civil society, which is impersonal, formal, and relatively more amoral, with merely administrative ties. The chief distinction in Tonnies’s view is that while the onus of pursuing the community’s goals of common well-being is on its members, in a civil society, the group itself becomes instrumental for its members’ individual goals and aims. Community may be exemplified by a family or neighborhood, while a modern state or industrial corporation arising out of an urban capitalist setting is an example of society. The former is romanticized as embodying more enduring, personal relationships while in the latter relationships are more impersonal, superficial, and motivated by professional and monetary connections. Tonnies’s theorization between the organic mutually sustaining holistic natures of a community as opposed to the individual-centered society has become central to debates on the sociological, moral, and political implications of community. The chief distinction between the two modes of organization or belonging can be seen as that between holistic communitarianism versus individual liberalism, and this has implications for citizenship, political participation, and notions of common good. However, communities, although they imply a largely positive social network based on collaborative ties and shared goals, can also be oppressive forces if they assume an identity that is oriented on exclusionary or supremacist principles in the guise of universal or community values. Nazi Germany under Hitler’s rule, guided by principles of Aryan supremacy, or Fascist Italy under Mussolini are examples of pathological community formations that pervert the generally benign and organic roots
20â•…â•… community of community. The relation between individual and community has to be one that is oriented toward the common good but still gives the individual space to exercise his or her own free will. The conflict between individual and the community is a common theme in literature and focuses on opposing forces, society, history, and the community at odds with individual subjectivity, desire, and will. In classical Greek drama, the community appears in the guise of the chorus of townspeople articulating the voice of common sense and reason. Whether it is the group of elders in Sophocles’ Oedipus the King who preach temperance and moderation to the hotheaded and arrogant Oedipus or the chorus of women in Euripides’ Medea who call upon her maternal instincts to subdue her desire for revenge against Jason, they both advocate the central principle of the golden mean which was such a cornerstone of Greek civilization. Literary theorists such as Northrop Frye have argued that tragedy as a form usually ends with the expulsion or death of the overweening tragic protagonist who threatens social norms and community well-being through his larger-than-life desires or hubris, while comedies end with community values being restored through communal celebrations, such as a wedding where the hero and heroine are finally united after a series of obstacles. These community values are affirmed in such works as William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night and Much Ado about Nothing. Twentieth-century literature has been marked by a critique of a postindustrial society that values efficiency and productivity over the more personal communal bonds. The themes of alienation and isolation amid the impersonality of the modern metropolis are recurrent in modernist literature and especially resonant in the poetry of T. S. Eliot in the figure of a much-misunderstood Alfred J. Prufrock, who yearns to communicate his spiritual insights but is spurned by the superficiality of society ladies who talk of Michelangelo (see “Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, The”). Similarly, W. H. Auden, in his poem “The Unknown Citizen,” bemoans the impersonal efficiency of the modern welfare state that is technologically advanced and has statistics on all its citizens but does not really know whether its individuals are free or happy. The poem implies that
for the modern state, even the question of freedom and happiness would be a quantifiable category, if it had thought of these as important variables on which statistics should be kept. While modernist literature’s innovations in narrative techniques, such as stream of consciousness, testify to the influence of Sigmund Freud and William James in shedding new light on human psychology and consciousness and hence the intense focus on subjectivity, they also function as a testament to the decline of a shared communal framework of values that underlines the decline of community. One could argue that the prevalence of the third-person narrative in the 18th- and 19thcentury novel that features an all-knowing, often judgmental narrator, who takes the reader by the hand and guides him or her through the world of the novel, underscores the existence of community with its assumption of shared moral values. As the world has become more fragmented, the narrative voice has also become more partial, personal, and prone to error. For instance, in Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, the transformation of Ebenezer Scrooge from a miserly misanthrope to one who shares in the spirit of Christmas cheer and sharing is an assertion of the power of community over the individual. In more contemporary times, Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral” traces the transformation of an insecure man, jealous of his wife’s blind friend who has come to visit them, from an alienated, somewhat misanthropic character to one who has an epiphany about the importance of human contact and shared community values shown in the building of ancient cathedrals. While overweening individualism threatening the stable social order and community well-being is a common theme, the obverse is equally true as well. In Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid ’s Tale, the dystopian community of Gilead, a totalitarian pseudo-Christian theocracy that subjugates women in the service of the state, is clearly an example of a community that can only exist by annihilating individual free will and agency, especially that of women. Community is thus a complex concept possessing varying ethical, political, social, psychological, and epistemological dimensions, which finds recurrent expression as a literary theme.
crueltyâ•…â•… 21 See also Anonymous: Beowulf; Austen, Jane: Emma; Baldwin, James: Go Tell It on the Mountain; Black Elk: Black Elk Speaks; Bradford, William: Of Plymouth Plantation; Coetzee, J. M.: Waiting for the Barbarians; Conrad, Joseph: Heart of Darkness; Crane, Stephen: Open Boat, The; Forster, E. M.: Passage to India, A; Gaines, Ernest J.: Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, The, and Lesson Before D ying, A; García Márquez, Gabriel: One Hundred Years of Solitude; Hardy, Thomas: Tess of the d ’Urbervilles; Harte, Bret: “Luck of Roaring Camp, The”; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: House of the Seven Gables, The; McCullers, Carson: Member of the Wedding, The; Miller, Arthur: Crucible, The; Mistry, Rohinton: Fine Balance, A; Naylor, Gloria: Women of Brewster Place, The; Orwell, George: Animal Farm; Paine, Thomas: “Age of Reason, The,” and Common Sense; Shakespeare, William: Twelfth Night; Silko, Leslie Marmon: Almanac of the Dead; Steinbeck, John: Pearl, The; Synge, John Millington: Playboy of the Western World, The; Twain, Mark: Adventures of Tom Sawyer, The; Wharton, Edith: Age of Innocence, and Ethan Frome. FURTHER READING Bauman, Zygmunt. Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001. Hilde, Thomas C. “The Cosmopolitan Project: Does the Internet Have a Global Public Face?” In The Internet in Public Life, edited by Verna V. Gehring, Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2004. 121–130. Joyce, James. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. New York: Penguin, 1987. Tonnies, Ferdinand. Community and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Rajender Kaur
cruelty
The idea of cruelty, for most readers, calls to mind actions or behaviors that inflict suffering in ways that are especially coldhearted, depraved, or indifferent. Acts or words considered cruel seem to go beyond what is merely unkind or simply violent
in a way that harms the victim irreparably. Cruelty can be physical or mental; it can be inflicted upon human beings or upon animals; it can take the form of large-scale horrors such as the Holocaust or the September 11, 2001, destruction of the World Trade Center; or it can involve only two people, as in cases of domestic abuse. The binding factor in all of these cases is the intent of the perpetrator. To willfully hurt others and to feel indifferent at the suffering of one’s fellow human beings, to enjoy or delight in the infliction of pain—these are acts of cruelty. Acts of cruelty such as torture, domestic abuse, terrorism, and genocide profoundly alter the victims’ sense of the world, how it works, and their place in it. Perpetrators attempt to take away the victims’ humanity, to reduce them to an object in a way that simple violence does not. At first glance, the definition of cruelty might seem straightforward, but upon further consideration, determining what is cruel and what is not is not so easy. Seneca, a Roman philosopher from the first century, wrote that the factor that determines cruelty rests in the mind of the perpetrator in exacting punishment. Excessive punishment or torture was, for Seneca, the opposite of clemency, or mercy, and leaders should avoid it. Seneca wrote his treatise De Clementia to the Roman emperor Nero, to whom he was an adviser. He encouraged the cultivation of mercy in the emperor, in what was probably an attempt to move him away from the brutality of his predecessors. St. Augustine (354–430), one of the most important figures in the development of Western Christianity, went beyond Seneca’s theories and wrote of cruelty as a reflexive evil that destroys its inflicter and should be judged by its effect on him or her. What is important here is that Augustine explored the connection between the body and the soul, understanding that cruelty goes beyond the physical pain it causes and alters the way both victim and victimizer see the world. In Summa Theologica, St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–74) relied heavily on Seneca’s work when he discussed cruelty, believing that “harshness of mind” in the inflicter of cruelty was the determining factor. For Thomas Aquinas, intention was all-important; in other words, an excessive punishment was certainly unjust, but not necessarily
22â•…â•… cruelty cruel. For Michel Montaigne, the French philosopher and essayist writing in the 16th century, intent was important, but it was not the only determining factor. Actions could be cruel in and of themselves even when allowed by law. For instance, many societies have allowed slavery, but as Montaigne pointed out, the fact that the practice is legal does not make it merciful. Like St. Augustine, the 18th-century British philosopher John Locke focused on the effect cruelty has on the perpetrator. Even when the victims were animals and not human beings, Locke believed cruelty had a destructive effect on those who inflicted harm. If it seems that much philosophical thought on cruelty attempts to define it, perhaps that is because one of the central philosophical questions on the topic has to do with whether or not cruelty is ever justified. In order to justify (or to condemn) cruelty, it must first be defined. For instance, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the United States in World War II was without question devastating and brutal, and many noncombatants, including children, were seriously injured and killed. Whether or not we are willing to call that action cruel, however, seems to have to do with whether or not it was justified. Psychologists, however, have argued that in the minds of many perpetrators of violence, any action may be justified. Roy Baumeister, for instance, argues that most acts of violence result from mutual, escalating provocations and grievances. This leads to a rationalization in the mind of the victimizer. For instance, people often feel victimized by other groups and convince themselves they are acting out of a justified need for a role reversal. Rapists, for instance, often claim to have been enacting a kind of revenge against all women (166). Incredibly, the Ku Klax Klan often claimed they were acting out of revenge when they burned down homes, raped black women, and lynched black men throughout the 20th century. These acts, they claimed, were in retaliation against freed slaves who had disrupted the system of white superiority and complacency (166–167). Ideology is often another justification for violence and cruelty. Even seemingly good, ordinary people who have convinced themselves they are “fighting for a good cause” have engaged in despicable acts of cruelty. The Crusades, for instance,
beginning in the 1100s, were led by soldiers who believed they were heeding the pope’s call to recapture the Holy Land. In general, these were ordinary men who believed they were serving their God, but they participated in the vast slaughter of innocent human beings and barbaric acts of brutality, such as burning people alive and mutilating and torturing noncombatants. In the Ukraine in the mid-20th century, soldiers under the orders of Joseph Stalin systematically confiscated the food of peasant farmers and their families all in the name of the “universal triumph of communism” (Baumeister 179). Ultimately, 11 million starved to death—a torturous, brutal way to die. But these soldiers, acting in the sway of an ideology, believed, or forced themselves to believe, that the ends justified the means. Indeed, many philosophers and psychologists would argue that driven by ideology, or in the pursuit of revenge, most human beings are capable of cruelty. In fact, two famous experiments seem to indicate that even being placed in a culture whereby such acts are acceptable and being given orders is enough for many ordinary people to cross the line. In 1963, the social psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment that has come to be named for him. Participants were told to choose slips of paper from a hat, and they would be assigned either “teacher” or “learner.” The teacher would read word pairs out to the learner and then ask questions about what the learner remembered. When the learner made a mistake, the teacher was to administer an increasingly painful electric shock. In reality, there were no actual shocks; all the slips said “teacher,” and the “learner” was played by an actor. Even when the learner asked to stop the experiment, 65 percent of the subjects went on to administer the most powerful shock: 450 volts. In the 1972 Stanford Prison Experiment, the psychologist Philip Zimbardo staged an experiment in which undergraduate volunteers took on the roles of “prisoner” and “guard” in a mock prison. The “guards” became so sadistic and the “prisoners” so emotionally traumatized that the experiment, planned for two weeks, was halted after six days. In both of these experiments, the victimizers focused not on the human beings on the receiving end of the cruelty, but on the rationales they had been given. Cruelty must necessarily turn human
deathâ•…â•… 23 subjects into objects, and this transformation is the reason why the victims of cruelty experience such a disruption of their worldview. Victims of cruelty move from “life—to a kind of death” (Arnault 7). They feel they can never go back to the vision of life before. There can be no redemption, no happy ending. While life may go on, the meaning of life is forever changed for them. Flannery O’Connor’s short story “A Good Man Is Hard to Find” is an excellent example of how cruelty disrupts meaning. The family who are murdered in the story do not resist their deaths; the moments in which they are taken into the woods and shot seem surreal. The grandmother refuses to comprehend what is happening around her, exhorting The Misfit to “Pray!” and insisting, beyond reason, that he would not kill an old lady. In Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights, Heathcliff endures cruelty throughout his life. He is, almost like a stray dog, brought home to Wuthering Heights by Mr. Earnshaw. Although he is fed and clothed, he is treated more as an animal than a human, with no one save Catherine encouraging him to have feelings. When Mr. Earnshaw dies, Heathcliff endures even greater cruelty at the hands of the sadistic Hindley. As he grows to adulthood, Heathcliff never establishes the human connections that would make it possible to be merciful. Instead, he learns that cruelty is the only way and turns that cruelty on Isabella, Hareton, Linton, and Cathy. Cruelty, and the evil that lurks behind it, has devastating consequences for both victims and victimizers. Victimizers tend to lose their humanity, even as they force themselves to view their victims as something less than human. Victims, on the other hand, tend to enter a new, incomprehensible world, one in which they have no rights, no agency, no dignity, no humanity. Ultimately, although they may move past the cruelty physically and emotionally, they are unable to see the world the same way ever again. See also Coetzee, J. M.: Waiting for the Barbarians; Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan: Hound of the Baskervilles; Frank, Anne: Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl; Golding, William: Lord of the Flies; Hinton, S. E.: Outsiders, The; Orwell, George: Animal Farm;
Poe, Edgar Allan: “Tell-Tale Heart, The”: Salinger, J. D.: Catcher in the Rye, The; Virgil: Aeneid, The; Williams, Tennessee: Streetcar Named Desire, A. FURTHER READING Arnault, Lynne. “Cruelty, Horror, and the Will to Redemption.” Hypatia 18, no. 2 (2003): 155–188. Baumeister, Roy F. Evil: Inside Human Cruelty and Violence. New York: Freeman, 1997. Edgerton, Robert B. The Balance of Human Kindness and Cruelty: Why We Are the Way We Are. Lewiston, N.Y.: Mellen Press, 2005 Waller, James. Becoming Evil: How Ordinary People Commit Genocide and Mass Killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
death
In Poetics, Aristotle recognized literature’s value for humanity when he stated that “the object of art is an imitation of life.” Writers have always used the situations and events of everyday life in their writing, and since death is just as much a part of life as anything else, it is arguably one of the most recurring themes in all of literature. In poetry, fiction, and drama, death is seen as a central theme that gives way to other themes ranging from justice to rites of passage to grief. Death is a crucial fact of life, and from the emotional response to death to the various religious frameworks through which it is interpreted, it is obvious why death is used as a theme in literature so extensively. In ancient literature, the theme of death is seen regularly. In Gilgamesh, the ancient epic of Mesopotamia, death is clearly illustrated through relationships, responding to the deaths of loved ones, and war. Once Gilgamesh comes to love Enkidu, he dies, and the reader is left with Gilgamesh’s thoughts and response to his friend’s death. In ancient Greek mythology, the Trojan War provided a framework for a myriad of stories, including Homer’s The Iliad and The Odyssey; both stories recount numerous lengthy battles and gruesome scenes of death. Later, Sophocles, Aeschylus, and Euripides, the three great Greek tragedians, created death-driven plays, such as Sophocles’ Oedipus The King and Antigone,
24â•…â•… death which includes patricide, suicide, and fratricide. In Poetics, Aristotle highlights the value of tragedy, which compels an audience to feel a catharsis, or cleansing of the soul, by witnessing tragic acts, typically deaths of highly regarded characters—deaths those characters may not totally deserve. Even in ancient literature, authors were utilizing death as a theme to elicit an emotional response in the reader or audience. Later, in the Roman myths told in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, death is one of the underlying themes present, in which characters face transformation, which for them is often the same as death. In the Roman poet Virgil’s The Aeneid, Aeneas is to establish the city of Rome, but this is only after his home has been destroyed and his family killed. Throughout the story, the reader witnesses constant death in battle. In book 10, after Aeneas takes the life of Lausus, his father, Mezentius, comes to Aeneas to avenge his son’s death. Mezentius calls out to Aeneas, why do you ridicule me, threaten me with death? Killing is no crime. .╯.╯. Let me rest in the grave beside my son, in the comradeship of death. (Virgil, The Aeneid, book 10:1,067–1,077) Here it seems that death would be a comfort to this father whose son has been killed in combat. In this perspective, a reader can understand how death is seen in battle as valorous and can even be consoling. Especially throughout literature of battle and war, death is faced with bravery and moral courage. In the Middle Ages, the theme of death often underlies the literature as well. In a lot of the romance literature, such as Sir Thomas Mallory’s Le Morte D’Arthur, the idea of chivalry is a prominent theme, and one aspect of chivalry was that a knight was expected to fight valiantly to uphold his king’s or his lady’s honor, even forfeit his life in battle if need be. One of the major European events in the Middle Ages, the bubonic plague, certainly had an effect on literature, as in Giovanni Boccaccio’s The Decameron, in which 10 people flee the plague in
Florence, and each tells a different story over the course of 10 days in order to keep his or her mind off of the deaths of friends and loved ones left behind. One of the biggest literary figures of the Middle Ages, Dante Alighieri, wrote The Divine Comedy, a story in which the poet is given a guided tour of life after visiting the inferno, purgatory, and heaven. This work seems reminiscent of Aristotle’s catharsis idea in that the reader’s soul is cleansed by seeing what Dante sees. Geoffrey Chaucer uses death as a central theme in several of his Canterbury Tales. In “The Pardoner’s Tale,” three men actually set out to find and kill Death, who has taken the life of one of their friends. The Wife of Bath, one of the most critically examined female literary characters, tells a story of a knight who faces execution unless he can find out what women truly want. In these stories Chaucer uses death as a theme to demonstrate several ideas: Humans are afraid of death; they sometimes become at once saddened and angry when loved ones die; and finally, something demonstrated in nearly all of these works is the idea that humans fear death because they value life so dearly and they do not know what comes after death. Not knowing what comes after death is significantly portrayed in Renaissance literature as well, especially in the poetry of England, in which the theme of carpe diem (Latin for “seize the day”) is so common. From Robert Herrick’s iconic “To the Virgins to Make Much of Time” to John Donne, the idea of “seize the day” is not so much an inspiration to enjoy life as it is a warning to enjoy life quickly before it ends. On the other hand, in Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus, the title character makes a deal, transferring his soul to the devil for immortality because he does not want to die. Later in the Renaissance, John Milton composed one of the greatest epics in the English language, Paradise Lost, in which he sets out to “justify the ways of God to men” (book 1, l. 26). In doing so, he must explain death as much as life. However, any discussion of Renaissance literature must highlight William Shakespeare, who used the theme of death in many of his works. In Sonnet 73, he uses the traditional symbolism of seasons, in which spring represents birth and youth
educationâ•…â•… 25 while winter represents death with the lines “That time of year thou mayst in me behold, / When yellow leaves, or none, or few do hang, / Upon those boughs which shake against the cold” (ll. 1–3). The speaker is calling for the reader to see how he is getting close to death. The sonnet ends with the line “To love that well, which thou must leave ere long” (l. 14), which again alludes to the carpe diem theme. However, Shakespeare incorporates diverse ideas about death in his works, and one that is different is in Sonnet 71, “No longer mourn for me when I am dead,” in which the speaker recommends forgetting about him, “Lest the wide world should look into your moan / And mock you with me after I am gone” (ll. 13–14). Here, Shakespeare proposes a different idea about death, mainly to forgo grieving and simply get on with life. Of course, he employs the death theme in his plays in various ways as well, from the suicidal Ophelia in Hamlet to the pretended death of Hero in Much Ado about Nothing to the deaths brought on by the evil Iago in Othello. Characters avenge deaths of loved ones, face death in battle, and even plot the betrayal of other characters. Shakespeare is perhaps unparalleled in all of literature in his ability to invoke the whole range of human emotion regarding death. Through later periods of literature all over the world, authors have continued to use death as a major theme, symbolically, metaphorically, and physically. Evident in such novels as Herman Melville’s Moby Dick, Charles Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities, and Richard Wright’s Native Son, Alexandre Dumas’s The Count of Monte Cristo, Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace, death provides authors with the substance to create an emotional response in the reader like no other topic. Themes like betrayal, vengeance, greed, honor, justice, courage, and failure are almost always portrayed in conjunction with death. Some of the great novels have been born in a response to death, including Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, in which Victor struggles to create life out of his response to his own mother’s death, but in the ensuing action, he loses those most dear to him. Looking at more contemporary novels, some of the most famous American writers—Stephen King, John Grisham, Nicholas Sparks—are noted for their
riveting stories that revolve around mystery and death. Authors have all the material of life around them from which to draw, but nevertheless, death has always been and will continue to be one of the most prominent themes in literature, and for many reasons: There is a pervading symbolism attached to death in different cultures and religions. Death signifies an end and a great mystery about what comes next, and the range of human emotions surrounding it is so vast that authors are able to combine it with many other themes. See also Allende, Isabel: House of Spirits, The; Bierce, Ambrose: “Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge, An”; Brontë, Emily: Wuthering Heights; Browning, Robert: “My Last Duchess”; Camus, Albert: Stranger, The; Capote, Truman: In Cold Blood; Coleridge, Samuel Taylor: “Rime of the Ancient Mariner, The”: DeLillo, Don: White Noise; Dickens, Charles: Christmas Carol, A; Dickinson, Emily: poems; Eliot, T. S.: “Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, The”; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: “Rappaccini’s Daughter”; Keats, John: poetry; Miller, Arthur: Death of a Salesman; Poe, Edgar Allan: “Fall of the House of Usher, The”; Shakespeare, William: Romeo and Juliet; Welty, Eudora: Optimist ’s Daughter, The; Whitman, Walt; Leaves of Grass; Woolf, Virginia: Mrs Dalloway; To the Lighthouse. FURTHER READING Fiedler, Leslie. Love and Death in the American Novel. New York: Dalkey Archive Press, 1998.
Christopher Lessick
education
It is no surprise that education, which affects the relationship between the individual and society, should figure as a perennial theme in literature from the ancient classics of Greece and Rome to contemporary literature. The shadow of the Dark Ages is said to have lifted only after the ancient classics were rediscovered in the wake of the fall of Constantinople in 1453 and the dispersal of its famous libraries that housed these books. Education is not always delivered through the same channels, nor does it always serve the same purposes, and it is not
26â•…â•… education always a positive force. However, its ability to shape society is undeniable. Plato’s The Republic offers two models of education, one for warrior rulers and the other a more philosophical approach for the philosopher ruler, given through the pedagogical example and allegory of the cave. In this allegory, Plato describes a group of people who have been imprisoned in a cave all their lives. They see shadows of things passing in front of them and believe the shadows to be reality. The philosopher is like a prisoner freed from the cave who understands now the true reality of things. The highest goal of this form of education is knowledge of the good, and it is only through this that Plato’s enlightened philosopher rulers can rule a utopian community. Similarly, Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince is focused on the education of the sovereign or political leader of a state in the art of good governance through a strategic deployment of force and guile. Machiavelli uses the metaphors of the lion and the fox to underscore the strength, nobility, slyness, and shrewdness needed to retain power and triumph over one’s rivals. During the Renaissance, education found literary expression in the form of conduct books. The Renaissance was a golden age for the proliferation of conduct and etiquette books, which were an important aspect in the achievement of a well-rounded individual, especially in a feudal world where manners reflected the person. Unlike practical books that taught the martial arts or educated one in the sciences and arts, these books had a strong moral dimension that sought to inculcate ethical virtues and produce the ideal gentleman or gentlewoman. Baldassare Castiglione’s The Book of the Courtier (1528) is a prescriptive treatise on the ideal courtier and outlines the essential virtues that he should embody. Narrated through an engaging series of imaginary conversations between the real-life courtiers to the duke of Urbino, Castiglione’s speakers discuss qualities of noble behavior—namely, discretion, decorum, nonchalance and gracefulness—as well as wider questions, such as the duties of a good government and the true nature of love. Castiglione’s literary skill and sharp psychological insights make this guide to manners both an entertaining
and a definitive glimpse into the ideals and debates of Renaissance life. Advice and conduct books targeted at women were an especially popular genre in 19th-century England and America. These guidebooks recommended a broad education for women that also included French, drawing, sewing, and the ability to sing or play a musical instrument. They emphasized the importance of a sweet demeanor and courteous tongue, of good humor and wit. Jane Austen’s heroines, for example, embody the lightness of spirit and wit that all women could aspire to if they wanted to snare a suitable man. In America, Emily Thornwell’s The Lady’s Guide to Perfect Gentility (New York, 1857) was aimed at white women, The College of Life, or Practical Self-Educator [sic], a Manual of Self-Improvement for the Colored Race, shows that rules for good wifehood were proposed for both white and African-American middle-class women. Writings on education such as John Milton’s Tract on Education and Free Expression (1644), and John Locke’s Thoughts Concerning Education (1693) reflect the intense debates on education in the 17th and 18th century. Mary Wollstonecraft wrote Thoughts on the Education of Daughters (1786), and her later A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792) is a radical political and educational treatise. She critiques Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s view on women’s education and argues that women are not naturally submissive and dependent creatures and that if they exercised their rationality through a good education, they could be equal partners of men. In emphasizing rationality in women, Wollstonecraft was extending the basic ideas of Enlightenment philosophy to women. Rousseau’s Émile, or On Education (1762) was the precursor of the education novel. In Émile, Rousseau advocates a system of education that would enable the natural man to survive corrupt society. Divided into five books, the novel traces Émile’s education from childhood to maturity. The first three books focus on childhood; the last two examine Émile’s youth and domestic and civil life as he falls in love with Sophie. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s Wilhelm Meister’s Apprenticeship (1795–96) is a novel of upbringing and education and tells the story of Wilhelm’s disillusionment with bourgeois
educationâ•…â•… 27 life as he apprentices himself to the mysterious Tower Society comprising enlightened aristocrats who will guide him towards his true calling. In Plots of Enlightenment: Education and Novel in Eighteenth Century England (1999), Richard A. Barney argues that the conjunction of the early novel with theories of education reflects the cultural developments of the 18th century. He states that “educational theory during the late 17th and 18th century formed an indispensable source for the novel’s narrative form and its often contradictory representation of individual social identity” (2). Education is an important theme in Victorian fiction, not just through the bildungsroman, or coming of age novel, but also in the form of a critique of methods of education, of corporal punishment, and of inhumane boarding schools such as those portrayed in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre (1847). The harsh and inhumane conditions of Lowood, the boarding school that Jane is dispatched to after she rebels against Mrs. Reed, reflect the desperate conditions of many real schools in England at that time. The hypocrisy of Brocklehurst, who lives a life of luxury while preaching the values of a Spartan life for the girls at Lowood highlights the hypocrisy of the moneyed patrons of many of these so-called charitable educational institutions run for the poor. The bildungsroman, or “novel of formation,” is essentially a novel of education as it traces the journey of a character from childhood to adulthood through education and the life experiences that he or she has. Charles Dickens’s David Copperf ield (1849–50) Nicholas Nickleby (1838–39), and Great Expectations (1860–61) are all novels that tell stories of rags to riches made possible through education and wealthy benefactors, but they also count the tragic toll in loss of friendships and self included in this process. In Dombey and Son (1846– 48), Dickens offers a critique of the emphasis on acquiring classical languages in schools as a passport to university admission and upward social mobility. The force-feeding of the boys is communicated through the aptly named Mr. Feeder’s method of instruction: “They knew no rest from the pursuit of strong-hearted verbs, savage noun-substantives, inflexible syntactic passages, and ghosts of exercises that appeared to them in their dreams” (11).
Contemporary cultural theorists recognize the vital relationship between power, knowledge, and cultural development. Literature as an expression and constituent of culture plays an integral role in the perpetuation of certain power relations, whether they are of class, caste, or gender relations. In Annie John, Jamaica Kincaid unmasks this colonial mission through the examination of colonial institutions such as the convent schools of various missionary orders. In particular, she excoriates the soft propaganda of British colonial rule through the widespread teaching of William Wordsworth’s poem “Daffodils.” Generations of students from Africa, South Asia, and the Caribbean have memorized “Daffodils” as the very epitome of romantic imagination and cultured sensibility, despite never having set sight on a daffodil. The daffodil only grows in temperate zones and is foreign to the tropical climes of these colonized places. If literature functions as a hegemonic tool to shape the sensibility of the colonized, it also functions as a counter-hegemonic tool by inspiring writings of resistance through the ideals of liberty, equality, and the brotherhood of man as set out in the works of Rousseau, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx. Much of postcolonial literature embodies this ambivalent function of education, as in Tsi Tsi Dangarembga’s Nervous Conditions (1988), in which the character Tambu aspires to wealth and status through education, but this very education becomes a culturally alienating force where she loses touch with her roots and family. Learning, knowledge, and culture are closely allied to literature, and consequently education and literature share a symbiotic relationship. By extension, adjectives such as literate, educated, cultured, and learned are synonyms of each other and reflect a conglomerate of desired attributes that are centered in and expressed through literature. Both education and literature work hand in hand as powerful transformative tools that can shape minds and hearts and in turn effect change for the better. See also Adams Henry: Education of Henry Adams, The; Amis, Kingsley: Lucky Jim; Bradbury, Ray: Fahrenheit 451; Byron, George Gordon Byron, Lord: Don Juan; Emerson, Ralph Waldo: “American Scholar, The”; Haley, Alex,
28â•…â•… ethics and Malcolm X: Autobiography of Malcolm X, The; Huxley, Aldous: Brave New World; Lawrence, D. H.: Rainbow, The; Plath, Sylvia: Bell Jar, The; Shaw, George Bernard: Pygmalion; Shelley, Mary: Frankenstein; Smith, Betty: Tree Grows in Brooklyn, A; Walker, Alice: Color Purple, The; Washington, Booker T.: Up from Slavery. FURTHER READING Barney, Richard A. Plots of Enlightenment: Education and the Novel in Eighteenth Century England. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. 1999. Dickens, Charles. Dombey and Son. New York: Penguin Classics, 1980. Hickling-Hudson, Anne, Julie Matthews, and Annette Woods, eds. Disrupting Preconceptions: Postcolonialism and Education. Brisbane: Post-Pressed, 2004.
Rajender Kaur
ethics
Ethics, as a branch of philosophy, seeks to explore rational decision making, with the hope of establishing standards for ideal behavior. Although most people believe that they have an inherent sense of right and wrong, thus making the study of ethics unnecessary, when ethics is examined across time and across various cultures, we see significant differences in how people interpret these concepts. Complicating things further, ethics is often taught alongside or as an extension of religion. For many, the answer to moral questions can be found in holy books or by consulting clergy. However, the way that Scripture is translated and interpreted has changed over time and is susceptible to different interpretations from one person to another. The study of ethics, then, seeks to explore the standards people have adopted for themselves, whether unconsciously or as part of moral or religious instruction, and to recommend a rational basis for these standards through this process. Because ethical positions are human constructs and because humans are capable of changing their conceptions of right and wrong, ethics is hardly a stable field of study. Rather, these debates are ongoing both among individuals and within larger, even global, communities.
Ethics and literature are intimately connected, having emerged simultaneously as humans developed language and began to communicate through stories. Literature is a particularly rich source of ethical reflection in that characters in imagined worlds can make decisions without hurting real people. There is also a level of ethical engagement outside of the story, on the formal level. How writers represent the world has an impact on how the reader thinks of his or her own world. Although fictional characters run the ethical spectrum (some positively evil, others absolutely good, most somewhere in between) stories very often involve characters making choices with ethical implications. Similarly, many philosophical texts dealing with ethics make use of small fictions to illustrate a point. For example, the German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) tells a story to help develop his position on being untruthful. If someone runs into your house to escape a murderer, and the murderer knocks at the door to ask if you have seen his or her intended victim, you are forced to decide between lying or telling the truth (and thus helping the murderer). For reasons that will be examined here, Kant argues that even in this situation it would be unethical to lie. If every ethical decision was clear-cut, there would not be much need for or interest in ethics. However, because so many decisions are not as clear-cut as people would like, often involving a choice between two conflicting principles that we believe in, it helps to think through and articulate not only what we believe to be right, but also the relative importance of the principles behind these decisions. While many philosophers have commented on these issues, there are a number of important positions that help to orient the novice. It should be noted, however, that although the Western tradition has been emphasized in American and British education, there are writers on ethics and ethical traditions from all over the globe, many of whom are gaining prominence in literary study. The English word ethics is derived from the Greek ethike, and in keeping with this linguistic borrowing, the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle (384–322 b.c.) is often thought of as the first significant contributor to the Western tradition of ethics. In the Aristotelian view, everything has a reason for existence, or some end
ethicsâ•…â•… 29 that it is meant to achieve. For humans, this state is happiness and it is reached through the cultivation of virtues. In order to be happy, humans have to cultivate their potential, often by seeking what Aristotle called the golden mean, or, in other words, by seeking moderation in most things. People act ethically—for example, giving up some of their dinner to help feed a hungry child—not because it is in their self-interest (most probably their stomach wants the whole thing) but because it reflects the cultivation of the virtue of generosity. Put simply, in Aristotelian ethics, people act to demonstrate or work toward being better, more virtuous people. They show who they are, not what they want. Kant, one of the most influential writers on ethics, offered a different, though not unrelated, position. In the Kant view, every human is free insofar as he or she has the ability to exercise reason. Ethics, then, is something that each person imposes on him or herself freely. Kant developed what he called the categorical imperative to describe the basis for ethical action. Lying, according to Kant, is evil in that it deprives others of the ability to exercise their reason properly. Therefore, telling the truth is a categorical imperative—it is the right thing to do, no matter the circumstances. The other major 18th-century ethical philosophy is that of utilitarianism. Developed by Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806– 73), utilitarianism can be described as a philosophy seeking the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Unlike Kant’s philosophy, utilitarianism is concerned only with the results of actions, not the intentions of the people making the decisions. For these thinkers, lying could be justified if it did more good than harm. There are, however, objections to this philosophy; most people would have a hard time sacrificing a family member to try to save two strangers, for example. One important 20th-century ethical thinker was Emmanuel Levinas (1906–95). Unlike Aristotle, Bentham, or Kant, Levinas begins his ideas on ethics with an interaction with another human. For Levinas, each of us has an infinite responsibility to the other person, who will always remain a mystery to us. In fact, Levinas argues that it is precisely when we stop looking at one another as unique people
that ethical problems arise. As a prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp during the Second World War, Levinas saw firsthand what people were capable of when they labeled others and thought of them as a group rather than as individuals. Precisely because his philosophy emphasizes the importance of language and labeling, Levinas’s thought demonstrates the importance of literature in either furthering bigotry or in exposing the workings of this procedure and warding against it. Few stories have remained in the popular imagination as long or as firmly as Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) and this, in large part, is because many of the ethical questions it raises are still being debated today. For example, is it right to take advantage of scientific advances to create new life forms? Is the genetic alteration of plants and animals safe? Is it right to clone humans? If we do, does the clone have the same rights as the original person? Relating to debates over abortion rights, when is a human a human? At what point do the rights of the child supersede the mother’s right to choose? Is it ethical to abort a pregnancy if the child has traits the parents consider to be undesirable? In the novel, Victor Frankenstein becomes obsessed with exploring the limits of his power as well as the limits of science and locks himself away from family and friends in order to create a being. Although he at first finds his creation to be beautiful, when the being finally awakes, Victor is horrified by his creation and runs away. Unlike his portrayal in many adaptations of the novel, Victor’s creation is hardly a monster at first; he begins his life by helping a poor family, learning their language, and reading John Milton’s Paradise Lost. Only after the monster, based solely on his appearance, is repeatedly rejected by those around him, including Victor, does he become evil and set out on a path of vengeance. The novel simultaneously taps into many ethical debates over the responsibility of parents to their children, the responsibility of society to those it superficially labels monstrous, the ethics governing experiments with science and technology, and many more. Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway (1925) is another novel that resonates with many ethical debates. Clarissa Dalloway is an unlikely heroine according to traditional logic, in that the culmina-
30â•…â•… family tion of her day is a small party she is giving (rather than, say, an epic battle or journey). By conveying her thinking directly through stream-of-consciousness narration, Woolf exposes the complicated, nearly countless threads of Clarissa’s thought as she goes about her day. In this way, the novel challenges not only 19th-century novelistic conventions but a predominant sexist society that values the accomplishments of “great men” as well. The character who seems to most resemble Clarissa, the shell-shocked soldier Septimus Smith, commits suicide at the end of the novel. This grim conclusion brings up two debates: first, whether suicide is ever ethically permissible, and second, what responsibility society has to returning soldiers. Haunting the entire novel is World War I and questions about whether war is ever justified and what its relation is to sexism at home and imperialism abroad. One of the strengths of Woolf ’s writing is the way in which it subtly critiques misogynistic society, demonstrating, for example, how much of the thinking and writing deemed important (including the ethical philosophies discussed above) are written by men or assume a male agent and fail to account for the impact of emotions and the subconscious on reason. Flann O’Brien’s At Swim-Two-Birds (1939) extends the formal experimentation of Woolf and O’Brien’s fellow Irishman James Joyce, offering a much more humorous, though no less ethical stance on writing. One of the novel’s many plots centers on Dermot Trellis, a popular fiction writer who uses character types to create marketable fiction. When he sleeps, his characters come to life and, unhappy with the roles they have been given, work to keep the writer asleep while they put him on trial. In this sense, this highly self-conscious work dramatizes the argument forwarded by Levinas. Additionally, Trellis’s decision to write a moral tale that nonetheless includes enough smut and bad language to keep it interesting offers a satiric commentary on the genre of the novel, whose practitioners have time and again defended the inclusion of “unsavory” parts as necessary to the book’s overall moral purpose. While the decision in this instance can be ridiculed as self-serving, it does seem that works that are overly didactic lack the complexity and therefore the staying power of other stories. It is clear that ethics will
continue to play an important part in literature for some time to come. See also Chestnutt, Charles W.: “Goophered Grapevine, The;” Davis, Rebecca Harding: Life in the Iron Mills; Defoe, Daniel: Moll Flanders; Ibsen, Henrik: Doll ’s House, A; Hedda Gabler; Ishiguro, Kazuo: Remains of the Day, The; Kingsolver, Barbara: Poisonwood Bible, The; Machiavelli, Niccolò: P rince, The; Malamud, Bernard: Natural, The; McMurtry, Larry: Lonesome Dove; Molière; Misanthrope, The; Paine, Thomas: “Age of Reason, The”; Thoreau, Henry David: “Resistance to Civil Government”; Vonnegut, Kurt: Slaughterhouse-Five; Wollstonecraft, Mary: Vindication of the Rights of Woman, A. FURTHER READING Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. 2d ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2002. Levinas, Emmanuel. Otherwise Than Being: or, Beyond Essence. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1998.
Daniel Ryan Morse
family
Much has been written on the institution of family in the fields of sociology, psychology, and anthropology, but one of the most famous comments on the family comes from literature. Leo Tolstoy wrote, in Anna Karenina, “Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” This comment underscores the importance of family happiness in our lives as human beings. From our family, we get our beliefs and values—religious, political, social. From our family, we learn to function in the real world as adults. We spend an average of 18 years in this environment, and its atmosphere, positive and negative, cannot help but deeply affect us for life. Furthermore, it is not just the families in which we are raised that shape our worldview, but also the families in which we function as adults. As parents and spouses, we tend to prioritize our families over all other aspects of life, and also to see our families
familyâ•…â•… 31 as coherent units, united in solidarity against the outside world. These family ties can be a soothing, strengthening force, helping us to battle life’s trials. However, these ties, always complicated, can also work to destroy us, rob us of the emotional tools we need to survive, and provide us with no defenses when trouble sets in. The families into which we are born and the families we create as we get older hold such importance for us because they are our primary sources of identification. The answer to the question “Who am I?” lies, in large part, in who our families are. The sociologist Jerome Kagan notes that children identify most readily with their parents, and that before adolescence they believe they share the same basic qualities and values with their “parental models” (Kagan et al. 40). In Chaim Potok’s The Chosen, David struggles with his father’s identity as a rabbi and Reuven struggles with his father’s identity as an academic. Neither boy feels the chosen path is necessarily the right one for him, but because they identify so strongly with their fathers, they are confused about who they are and who they are supposed to be. Ultimately, although they will, in a sense, trade paths, with Reuven entering the rabbinate and David going to graduate school, the bonds they formed with their families in childhood will serve them well. Not all family identifications are positive, of course. In Eugene O’Neill’s Long Day’s Journey into Night, the Tyrones all feel that they are doomed to never achieve their dreams and goals precisely because they are Tyrones. Brothers Edmund and Jamie, one a tubercular alcoholic and sometime merchant mariner and the other a failed alcoholic actor, are both trapped in a family system that will not allow them happiness, only dreams of happiness. Their father is a cheap, belittling alcoholic whose own dreams of vaudeville success died, and their mother is a morphine addict constantly in mourning for the son she lost as an infant and the “normal” life she gave up to marry Tyrone. For each of the Tyrones, “who they are” seems sadly predetermined. In addition to helping to identify us, family also provides us with a haven in times of adversity. Especially in the modern Western world, according to Edmund Shorter, there is a “special sense of soli-
darity that separates the domestic union from the surrounding community” (205). Families have a tendency to protect their own and to shut out the outside world if need be. Even families who participate heavily in the community, such as the March family in Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women, put family before others. For instance, when they receive a telegram that Mr. March is ill, Marmee goes off to Washington, D.C., to be with him, while Jo sells her hair to finance the trip. The entire family worries over Beth when she is ill and mourns her deeply when she dies, with Jo and Amy putting aside their differences for the sake of their beloved sister. In Tennessee Williams’s The Glass Menagerie, the “safe” haven of family actually becomes a handicap to both Laura and Tom Wingfield. Because Laura has the security of knowing she can cocoon herself away from the outside world that terrifies her so much, she never overcomes her painful shyness and cannot function outside her family’s apartment. For Tom, because his mother expects him to take care of the two of them, the “haven” becomes a prison, and he can think of nothing but escape, first the metaphorical escape of alcohol and movies and finally the literal escape of a job that will take him far away. The Wingfield family are able to keep their troubles locked up in an apartment because that is how families work. If they so choose, they may stay behind closed doors. This domestic sphere, as it is sometimes called, is not subject to what society might want, but only what the family itself desires. The ancient Greek philosopher Plato spoke of this separation between the “public sphere” and the “private sphere,” saying that public people must be responsible and rational at all times because they participate wholly in both private life and the life of the community around them. Therefore, they must have the highest moral standards and the most exacting sense of justice (Elshtain 53). Private people, on the other hand, need not live up to high ideals; they need only possess a “limited goodness” as it applies to the sphere in which they dwell (54). The family, then, as the nexus of the “private sphere” is important, but only because it provides a sanctuary from public life. Those most closely associated with the family, women and children, need only aspire to this “limited goodness.” This view, unfortunately,
32â•…â•… family persisted well into the 20th century. In Barbara Kingsolver’s The Poisonwood Bible, Nathan Price drags his wife and four daughters to Africa, bent on converting the Africans to Christianity but uncaring and unmindful of how his family will survive there. Reverend Price, as a public figure, believes that only he has the answers to how life should be lived. However, it becomes clear that it is the domestic sphere that will prove to be the most important prong of life in the Congo. Providing food and shelter and avoiding deadly animals is the immediate necessity for the Price family, and Price cannot do those things. In contrast to Nathan Price, the characters in Thornton Wilder’s Our Town celebrate the domestic sphere and the importance of family in our lives. The Stage Manager does not exalt the work of Dr. Gibbs, providing medical care to the town, over the cleaning, cooking, and child-care duties of Mrs. Gibbs, his wife. In fact, he explicitly points out how important these day-to-day tasks are in the life of a human being. Emily Webb’s final speech in the graveyard emphasizes the beauty of these mundane elements of life, demonstrating that when we underappreciate the private in favor of the more flashy public, we miss out on the wonder of life. Not all families provide sanctuary or comfort, however; many make life harder for their members. In fact, it is common in Western society to blame the problems of adults on unhappiness in their families when they were growing up, whether there is good evidence of this causal relationship or not (Kagan et al. 41). Bigger Thomas, the protagonist of Richard Wright’s Native Son, would like nothing more than to get away from his nagging mother and his annoying sister, who, he feels (with good reason), are unsupportive of him. Bigger’s frustration and anger, of course, have more to do with being poor and black in Chicago in the 1930s than they do with his mother, but it is significant that he would allow himself to blame her at all for the way he feels. Despite evidence to the contrary, many children look to their parents as the source of their travails. Bigger finds himself an alternative “family,” albeit not a very functional one, in the form of a small gang of friends. This impulse, too, is
common. When family, for whatever reason, disappoints us, we turn to others to provide identification, support, comfort, and sanctuary. While some social commentators might worry that this is a product of the modern era, history shows otherwise. Families have always had to compete with “others” and family members have always sought time with same-sex peers (Shorter, quoted 15). In fact, because the community no longer actively participates in private ceremonies surrounding birth, marriage, and death, it can be argued that families are more stable in the 21st century than they were before the industrial age. The family, far from being weakened by the changes and problems that come with the modern world, has instead adapted to it, remaining a source of inspiration in our lives and our literature. See also Albee, Edward: Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?; Anaya, Rudolfo: Bless Me, Ultima; Anderson, Sherwood: W inesburg, Ohio; Baldwin, James: Go Tell It on the Mountain; Cao Xuequin: Dream of the Red Chamber; Erdrich, Louise; Tracks; Franklin, Benjamin: Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, The; Hansberry, Lorraine: R aisin in the Sun, A; Homer: Odyssey, The; Houston, Jean Wakatsuki: Farewell to Manzanar ; Joyce, James: Dubliners; Kafka, Franz: “Metamorphosis, The”; Lewis, Sinclair: Main Street; Lowry, Lois: Giver, The; Molière: Tartuffe; O’Connor, Flannery: “Good Man Is Hard to Find, A”; Paton, Alan: Cry, the Beloved Country; Sophocles: Antigone; Steinbeck, John: Grapes of Wrath, The; Red Pony, The; Stowe, Harriet Beecher: Uncle Tom’s Cabin; Welty, Eudora: Optimist ’s Daughter, The; Wordsworth, William: “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey.” FURTHER READING Elshtain, Jean Bethke. The Family in Political Thought. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1982. Kagan, Jerome, Alice Rossi, and Tamara Hareven. The Family. New York: Norton, 1978. Shorter, Edward. The Making of the American Family. New York: Basic Books, 1975.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
fateâ•…â•… 33
fate
Fate, according to modern usage, is an agency or power that orders and predetermines a future course of events. In the ancient world, the often inexplicable and unavoidable in the affairs of human beings were attributed to fate. In Greek mythology, the goddesses known as the Fates, or Moirae, spun out the destinies of men and women. With the resurgence of confidence in human agency in fifth-century Athens, the Greeks began to develop more subtle conceptions of the relationship between fate and free will, especially through the tragedies of their theater, which were grounded in religious ritual. Sophocles’s Oedipus the King presents the classical treatment of human action as determined by fate or free will, or a convergence of the two. Such a convergence is understandable through a thought of the early Greek philosopher Heraclitus, “Man’s character is his fate [daimōn]” (Fragment 119), or the more familiar “Character is destiny.” Since demon (Gr. daimōn) means both “supernatural being” and “ministering, or indwelling spirit” (Oxford English Dictionary), the statement allows a convergence of superhuman and human agency, fate and free will. In other words, the guidance of our actions derives from ourselves, our own character. Sophocles’ tragedy supremely illustrates this idea. Oedipus, a prince of Corinth who is led to doubts about his parentage by a stray comment from a drunken man, goes to Delphi, where he consults the oracle, which tells him that he will kill his father and marry his mother. Shocked by this prophecy, Oedipus immediately flees Corinth to evade the oracle, the illogic and inconsistency of his actions never occurring to him. Regarding the unresolved question of parentage, he is fleeing the king and queen of Corinth, who might not be his parents. Regarding his contradictory attitude toward the oracle, he believes in the oracle enough to react to its admonition but not enough to realize that he cannot evade his foreknown destiny. His destiny, however, is not necessarily predetermined by the powers above. Rather, his foreknowledge makes him act irrationally to fulfill his destiny. This irrational conduct is part and parcel of his hubris (the overstepping of the bounds of human conduct), as exhibited often in his killing of an older
man (his real father) in a fit of alpha male rage and his angry browbeating of both Creon, his trustworthy brother-in-law, and Teiresias, the revered seer, when they tell him that he himself is the murderer of the former king of Thebes—to him preposterous but, nonetheless, the truth. Ironically, Oedipus’s foreknowledge drove him to fulfill the very prophecy that he was trying so hard to evade. He broke the two cardinal rules of Greek ethics that would guide one toward good destiny: “Know thyself ” and “Nothing in excess.” In his version of Oedipus, Sophocles turns the standard story of the futility of trying to evade an inevitable fate dictated by the gods and transforms it into a veritable tragedy of a human agent through his own character flaws and actions. In a further exploration of fate and autonomy, human action, expanded to a wide sphere of civic enterprise in Virgil’s The Aeneid, translates itself into a founding myth, whereby personal good yields to the greater good of nation formation. It is Aeneas, fleeing to Italy after the fall of Troy, who, according to prophecy, will there found a noble and courageous race, which in time will surpass all other nations. At the same time, the fate of Aeneas and his descendants, the Romans, is influenced by the gods’ actions, particularly in the conflict between Venus and Juno, who respectively support and hinder the Roman enterprise for reasons that go back to Priam’s son Paris choosing Venus, goddess of love, as the most beautiful over Hera, goddess of marriage, and Athena, goddess of wisdom. Thus, in this nationalistic epic, divine agency and human aspiration—both personal and civic—constitute fate. Aeneas is the epitome of Roman piety—loyalty and devotion toward one’s homeland, family, and father—and his fate is synonymous with the future of Rome. In his wanderings, Aeneas finds shelter in Africa with the sympathetic Dido, the queen of Carthage. Later, the two fall in love and consummate their union. Aeneas is torn between his desire for a woman and his patriotic love: “hic amor, haec patria est” (“There is my love, there my country” [4.537]). Ultimately, both divine pressure and a sense of duty, as solemnized by prophecy, compel Aeneas to leave Dido, choosing Roma and its implicit amor (Roma spelled backwards) of patria—love of country—as his destiny.
34â•…â•… fate Virgil wrote his epic during a period of civil war and political and moral chaos in Rome after the fall of the Republic. Accordingly, The Aeneid reflects an attempt to revive Roman greatness by appealing to its mythic history and its basic moral values of piety, virtue, and constancy. At the same time, it sets out a political ideology that could be used beyond Virgil’s moral aims to justify imperialistic ambitions in the aggrandizement of the Roman Empire. In more modern times, the concept of manifest destiny, in the history of American expansion, worked in similar fashion to appropriate Native American land and to exploit indigenous people, in a “divinely ordained” mission to spread democracy. Both examples show how human beings have exploited “divine agency” and otherwise manipulated fate and destiny toward self-interest. As in the previously discussed works, the classical trope of superhuman prophecy figures importantly in William Shakespeare’s Macbeth to advance plot and human intention. Unlike Oedipus the King and The Aeneid, both of which revolve around a single, defining prophecy, Shakespeare’s tragedy operates with two, one propelling the rise and the other underwriting the fall. The prophecy of the three witches (a spin-off of the Fates) incites the protagonist into evil in the first half of the play; then, symmetrically in the second half, the suddenly unveiled prophecy regarding Macduff seals Macbeth’s defeat and death. In act 1, Macbeth, thane of Glamis, and his companion, Banquo, come upon three witches on the heath who respectively address Macbeth as thane of Glamis, thane of Cawdor, and “king hereafter” (1.3.50). To Banquo they enounce the following occult prophecy: “Lesser than Macbeth, and greater. / Not so happy, yet much happier. / Thou shalt get kings, though thou be none” (1.3.67–68). With the partial fulfillment of the prophecy, his becoming thane of Cawdor, Macbeth is tempted against his better reason by the further fruits of “vaulting ambition” (1.7.27): kingship. When the she-man, Lady Macbeth, accuses him of unmanly cowardice in her infamous speech (of how she’d “[pluck her] nipple from [her baby’s] boneless gums, /And dash’d the brains out” [1.7.57–58]), she gives Macbeth the courage to kill the king. Though Mac-
beth chidingly affirms the moral position “I dare do all that may become a man; / Who dares do more is none” (1.7.46–47), he goes along with the plan of regicide nonetheless, crossing from honor to villainy. After the murder of Duncan, Macbeth becomes king in his place, but the more he tries, like Oedipus, to adhere to the prophecy, the more it eludes him. Hence, one murder leads to further: He has Banquo killed to ensure the crown for his progeny rather than Banquo’s as the witches foretold. Again like Oedipus, Macbeth both acts upon and acts against the prophecy in ardent contradiction, incited by momentary megalomania, sealed by the murderous deed and, thereafter, the will never to submit in the downward spiral of violence and death. The fulfillment of the witches’ prophecy drives the events of further carnage fatefully and fatally with a peculiar vitality of their own—a concatenation of one violent act igniting the next. Ultimately, Macbeth’s final end comes in a showdown in act 5, scene 8 with Macduff, the man “of no woman born” (5.8.13), the only man whom, according to the witches’ prophecy, Macbeth must fear. Presenting itself as the fulfillment of fate, the duel between Macbeth and Macduff can also be seen, like the other preceding cases, as an example of self-fulfilling prophecy. The event materializes not so much through the agency of higher powers but more often through a human being’s reactions to his foreknowledge of the event. In Macbeth’s case, it is less a superhuman agency that controls the outcome and more a wearied Macbeth himself, who, finally facing his nemesis, is taunted by Macduff, who fights him with invincible fury to avenge the deaths of his wife and children. In Romeo and Juliet, fate again plays a defining role to induce tragedy, working as a force of fortuity to obstruct the best intentions of human beings. In Shakespeare’s early tragedy about star-crossed lovers, Romeo and Juliet’s problems lie in that they have been born into two families engaged in an age-old feud. The deaths of the young lovers might have been prevented had there not been a plague, which kept Friar John from informing Romeo that Juliet was under a spell of faked death. They might have succeeded in living peacefully apart from their families, but such an outcome probably would not have effected an end to the feud that the chastening
freedomâ•…â•… 35 deaths of the two lovers apparently induced. Despite the role of fortuity in the tragic outcome, the more defining accountability rests in the human agents themselves. To this effect, the plague, seemingly fortuitous, precisely symbolizes the feud’s moral rottenness. In all these works, with the exception of The Aeneid, fate presents divine agency as muted, passively present, or altogether absent in the affairs of human beings. The emphasis, rather, is that events emerge through deliberate human action, not through chance. Such a conception prefigures the 20th-century philosophy of existentialism, which affirms a human being’s freedom to act and accountability for choices made, despite the nihilism to which random, meaningless, absurd events may lend themselves. Suzan-Lori Parks’s 21st-century Pulitzer Prize– winning play Topdog/Underdog further explores the themes of fate and free will through the experience of two African-American brothers struggling to get by and get ahead, the tragicomic absurdity of their underclass existence deftly balanced with the burdens placed by mythology and history on their autonomy. Their father, in a whim, named the brothers Lincoln and Booth, foreshadowing the antagonism that will plague their interactions within their instinctive alliance to assist each other in the plight of the African-American man: dearth of opportunity. Thus, they wrestle in the age-old struggle of Cain and Abel, representing the eternal clash between the topdog and underdog as both individuals and subgroups of society. Lincoln (Link) emancipates himself from his former lucrative but dangerous life as a three-card monte hustler and instead, ludicrously, becomes a black impersonator of Lincoln in an amusement park game, whereby he gets repeatedly “assassinated” by all the Booths in the world who have an “axe tuh grind” (46). Like President Lincoln, who single-handedly freed the slaves, Link tries to free his younger brother from the enthrallment of three-card monte—unsuccessfully because, like his namesake, he cannot offer Booth viable opportunities of gainful employment. His efforts to protect Booth only appear as actions of a rival and inexorably lead the two into a fatal face-off in the three-card monte. Again, as with all
the works previously discussed, in Topdog/Underdog it is individual action based on characteristic disposition, induced by the psychological, emotional, and economic urgencies of the dramatic moment, that bring Lincoln and Booth to the self-fulfilling prophecy presaged by fate, myth, and history. See also Bellow, Saul: Adventures of Augie March, The; Coleridge, Samuel Taylor: “Rime of the Ancient Mariner, The”; Conrad, Joseph: Lord Jim; Dickens, Charles: Tale of Two Cities, A; Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan: Hound of the Baskervilles, The; Dreiser, Theodore: American Tragedy, An; Edwards, Jonathan: “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”; Erdrich, Louise: Bingo Palace, The; Flaubert, Gustave: Madame Bovary; García Márquez, Gabriel: One Hundred Years of Solitude; Harte, Bret: “Outcasts of Poker Flats, The”; Homer: Iliad, The; Lowry, Lois: Giver, The; McCarthy, Cormac: All the P retty Horses; Naipaul, V. S.: Bend in the River, A; Shakespeare, William: Twelfth Night; Tolkien, J. R. R.: Lord of the Rings, The; Wilde, Oscar: Importance of Being Earnest, The. FURTHER READING May, Rollo. Freedom and Destiny. New York: Norton, 1981. Parks, Suzan-Lori. Topdog/Underdog. New York: Dramatist’s Play Service, 2004.
Unhae Langis
freedom
Close observers can see that, rather than standing still, the Statue of Liberty steps forward over broken shackles, representing how freedom progresses, its very definition changing over time. In the medieval worldview, freedom meant acting according to reason, and it focused on the discussion of free will. However, the modern definition of freedom primarily focuses on political and civil freedoms, having little to do with reason. This differentiation between medieval and modern conceptions of freedom follows the English philosopher John Locke’s 17thcentury divide between liberty and license. In his Second Treatise of Government (1690), Locke writes, “The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it,
36â•…â•… freedom which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent .╯.╯. there cannot be supposed any such subordination among us, that may authorize us to destroy one another” (4). Liberty, then, may be defined as actions that conform to reason, whereas license allows for acts of passion, which may subordinate or harm others or the self. The assumptions Locke makes concerning why humans should conform to reason adhere to the medieval notion of the universe—namely, that it has a Creator who endowed humans with reason. Locke writes that all humans are “the workmanship of one omnipotent and infinitely wise maker.” (4) Created by an omniscient, omnipotent being, humans struggle to understand how they also may maintain freedom. The tension between free will and predestination dominates the concerns of medieval writers from Saint Augustine to John Milton. In the middle of Dante Alighieri’s The Divine Comedy, Dante the Pilgrim discusses the relationship between the freedom of human beings and the plans of the omnipotent creator. His dialoguing partner, Marco the Lombard, says that while “the heavens set your appetites in motion .╯.╯.╯, on greater power and a better nature you, who are free, depend; that Force engenders the mind in you, outside the heaven’s sway” (2.16.73, 79–81). In other words, God creates humans and provides them with reason, but he does not control them. As the “joyful Maker,” God gives the human soul motion, so “it turns willingly to things that bring delight” (2.16.89, 90). The will turns naturally to good objects. While the will should know the good objects by reason, the human souls, catering to their physical over their spiritual nature, often falter and choose earthly over heavenly goods. Thus, Dante the Pilgrim, representing “everyman,” has used his freedom for earthly delights and must learn instead to align his will with God’s. Describing the beginning of humanity’s fall from God’s will, John Milton writes about the first human beings in Paradise Lost. Adam and Eve, whom God labels as “sufficient to have stood, though free to fall” (3.99), succumb to Satan’s temptation to eat of the tree of knowledge. Before Eve commits the sin, Adam reminds her that “God left free the will, for what obeys Reason is free, and reason he
made right” (9.350–351), echoing Milton’s notion that freedom depends on reason. Despite Adam’s warning, Eve subordinates her reason to her desire; Adam then follows. In this act, they both lose their freedom. In his essay “Freedom and Necessity in Paradise Lost,” J. B. Savage writes that Adam “by becoming absorbed in the things of the world, he becomes governed and determined by them .╯.╯.╯; by neglecting the motive of moral obligation, by which alone he is free, he must unavoidably surrender his freedom” (305). The example of Adam can be illustrated in an analogy: If a man freely walks off a cliff, he gives up his freedom and surrenders to the law of gravity. In the same way that physical actions must comply with the scientific laws of reality, so must moral actions observe the laws of reason. This definition of freedom reiterates the Lockean idea of liberty, while the actions of Satan and the first human beings illustrate license. Though Satan argues that it is “better to reign in hell than serve in heaven” (1.263), he does not realize that since God’s will dictates the laws of the universe, only slavery and determinism are possible when acting against God’s will. Locke refers to these laws as natural laws engrained in every human person, laws that respond to reason and protect the equal and independent nature of human beings. His Second Treatise is written to the government, so his main objective is to convince civil authorities of these innate human freedoms. While this definition of freedom is invoked in the American Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, it took almost two centuries to be properly enacted for all races, classes, and genders. African-American and feminist literature responds to this earlier oppression of the liberties of human beings, recognizing the need for what the 20th-century philosopher Isaiah Berlin categorizes as the two types of freedom—negative and positive freedom. While negative freedom is a freedom from oppression, coercion, or tyranny, positive freedom is a freedom for opportunity, ability, or privilege. In the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, the author tells his own story of his search for freedom from slavery and for education. Slavery is, first, an impingement on Freder-
freedomâ•…â•… 37 ick Douglass’s personal freedom and, second, a restriction on the positive freedom for education. Since freedom must correspond with reason, those restricted from education have greater susceptibility to slavery. As the English philosopher Francis Bacon famously said, “Knowledge is power.” Thus, the contrary also proves true: Ignorance is slavery. The two work with each other and against Douglass: His slavery keeps him from learning, and his ignorance keeps him a slave. When his mistress, Mrs. Auld, attempts to teach him to read, Mr. Auld forbids it, saying, “↜‘Learning would spoil the best nigger in the world. Now,’ said he, ‘if you teach that nigger (speaking of [Douglass]) how to read, there would be no keeping him. It would forever unfit him to be a slave’↜” (Douglass 41). Mr. Auld realizes that learning frees human beings. Overhearing this dialogue, Douglass, too, understands that knowledge is the “path from slavery to freedom” (41). Thus, through education, he overcomes the subordination he has suffered. In Kate Chopin’s The Awakening, her protagonist. Mrs. Edna Pontellier, overcomes her subordination as a woman through education as well, though of a different kind, education of experience. Similar to Douglass’s transformation, Edna begins by desiring negative freedom—freedom from the dominance of her husband. In a moment of selfawareness, she perceives “that her will had blazed up, stubborn and resistant” when her husband Léonce demanded that she come to bed. She wonders whether “her husband had ever spoken to her like that before, and if she had submitted to his command. Of course she had .╯.╯. But she could not realize why or how she should have yielded, feeling as she did then” (37). Edna then begins to seek positive freedom for individual autonomy—to use her time as she desires, painting, swimming, and taking a lover. However, these choices do not accord with reason but with desire, and thus they are not free. By the end of the novel, Edna has lost the respect of society, left her husband and her children, and has been abandoned by her lover. Realizing her solitude, she commits suicide, though this ending remains ambiguous as to its triumph. The modern interpretation of freedom, which could be categorized as license, exalts actions such as
Edna’s. In the 19th century, the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche declares that modern society has murdered God. Without a conception of God, all freedom is dictated by the autonomous individual. As the existentialist Jean-Paul Sartre writes, “Man is freedom.” Each person must determine his or her own freedom by acting as he or she chooses, apart from the constrictions of family, religion, time, or even reason. In his article “Existentialism and Human Freedom,” John Killinger writes, “Man’s nature is not ‘fixed’ as a stone’s or a tree’s is; he is a creature with the ability to choose, and decides what he shall become” (304). Humans have no created essence, but they must create their existence by free actions. Fyodor Dostoyevsky rightly foresaw the problem with this philosophy, namely that every action then becomes permissible. In Dostoyevsky’s masterful novel Crime and Punishment, the main character Raskolnikov believes that extraordinary human beings may act not only above the laws of morality or reason, but also above civil laws. His examples of extraordinary human beings include Isaac Newton and Napoleon Bonaparte—men who felt free to remove any persons who obstructed their noble purposes. Considering himself such an extraordinary person, Raskolnikov murders the local pawnshop owner because she belongs to the lower, ordinary kind of people. To comfort himself against the encroaching guilt that follows this act, he exclaims, “it wasn’t a human being I killed, it was a principle!” (274). The woman is no more than an object to him. This subordination and harm imposed on others is exactly what Locke thinks stems from not subjecting freedom to reason, what African Americans and women overcame in the 20th century, and what still must be fought against in contemporary societies around the world. See also Capote, Truman: In Cold Blood; Chestnutt, Charles W.: “Goophered Grapevine, The”; Equiano, Olaudah: Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano; Flaubert, Gustave: Madame Bovary; Gilman, Charlotte Perkins: Yellow Wallpaper, The; Hughes, Langston: poems; James, Henry: Daisy Miller; Portrait of a Lady, The; Kafka, Franz: Metamorphosis, The; Kerouac, Jack: On the
38â•…â•… futility Road; London, Jack: Call of the Wild, The; Morrison, Toni: Beloved; Mukherjee, Bharati: Middleman and Other Stories, The; Paine, Thomas: “Common Sense”; Steinbeck, John: Of Mice and Men. FURTHER READING Chopin, Kate. The Awakening. New York: Norton, 1993. Dostoyevsky, Fyodor. Crime and Punishment. Translated by Constance Garnett. New York: Bantam, 1996. Killinger, John. “Existentialism and Human Freedom.” English Journal 50, no. 5 (May 1961): 303–313. Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government. New York: Barnes & Noble, 2004. Savage, J. B. “Freedom and Necessity in Paradise Lost. ELH 44, no. 2 (Summer 1977): 286–311.
Jessica Hooten
futility
The theme of futility or overriding hopelessness in literature has been driven by philosophical concepts regarding life and how we live it. The later decades of the 19th century saw rapid industrialization, which helped support Karl Marx’s theories of alienation and the consideration of all history as a battle between opposing economic forces—an eternal class struggle between the new industrialists and their workers. If Marx was right, then human history is robbed of any emotional or superlative value and God is unnecessary. Thus, human life becomes valueless and life after death just so much dust and myth. In 1859, Charles Darwin (1809–82) wrote On the Origin of Species, in which humans were shown as descending from primates. The long-held idea that man was simply made in the image of God was challenged by science. Thomas Huxley (1825–95), the grandfather of the novelist Aldous Huxley (1894–1963) was one of the eminent men who took upon himself to refute religion and establish this new Darwinian idea. Marx and Darwin, though perhaps not intentionally in the latter’s case, called the idea of God’s existence into question. This naturally had the effect of extinguishing any hope that people had of better lives after death. This sense of futility and utter hopelessness was expressed in
British literature by Matthew Arnold (1822–28) in Dover Beach (1851): The Sea of Faith Was once, too, at the full, and round earth’s shore Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furl’d. But now I only hear Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar, Retreating, to the breath Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear And naked shingles of the world. This is further reflected in Thomas Hardy’s pessimistic novels The Return of the Native (1878), Tess of the d ’Urbervilles (1891), and Jude the Obscure (1895). This line of thinking was continued by the likes of the French author Albert Camus (1913–60), who had written on the monotonous absurdity of daily life in The Myth of Sisyphus (1942). The novel is a retelling of the ancient myth of Sisyphus, who has to forever push a stone up a hill. Our lives are like Sisyphus’s: No matter what we do, we are bound to fail. Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus (1604) is a well-known study in futility. Faustus loses all hope in both the Renaissance and Christianity. He can only lament when he hears Satan answer about life: Why this is hell, nor am I out of it. Think’st thou that I, who saw the face of God, And tasted the eternal joys of heaven, Am not tormented with ten thousand hells In being deprived of everlasting bliss? (3.74–78) Even in the 17th century, Marlowe anticipated the intensity of futility’s pain that the modern era would explore in depth. The irony of the critiques of futility, both literary and philosophical, lies in their ultimately revealing the “charm” of despair and how futility almost always gives way to inner spiritual freedom. We see these kinds of Romantic meditations on futility in such diverse works as William Shakespeare’s Mac-
futilityâ•…â•… 39 (1603) and Carson McCullers’s The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter (1940). Tragedy, according to Aristotle, is a journey by the audience into futility and then a rebirth from despair. Macbeth goes insane when accosted with the pointlessness of action: beth
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow, Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. (5.5.19–23) These famous lines are glossed as the essence of futility and how, being aware of the deceptive nature of time, we will surely be wary of actions similar to Macbeth’s. The underlying idea is that there still remain ways to make our lives less than futile, if only we can avoid imitating Macbeth. After all, according to Aristotle, tragedies purge us even of despair. When, by definition, the awareness of futility cannot conceive of anything beyond the limitations of the present moment, this leaves alone any soul whose freedom is worth attaining. Futility in literature is not an isolated concept. Rather, it is located firmly within the repressive process of Sigmund Freud’s pleasure principle, or the id. According to Freud, when our desires are thwarted, we start sinking into despair, which creates within us a sense of uselessness or futility. This is not to be confused with the ideas of existential philosophers such as Jean Paul Sartre (1905–80), who saw the world as a stage where every action is meaningless. Existentialism posits that while our actions may be meaningless, they are influenced by inner spiritual struggles. Much later, after the great surge of existentialist writings, we find the French philosopher Jacques Derrida (1930–2004) establishing futility as the end result of his forays into literature and texts. Derrida argued that it is futile to search for ultimate meanings in texts, including patterns in historical thought. Futility, then, has a long ideological history, from the laments of the preacher in Ecclesiastes, “Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity. What profit hath a man of all his labour which he taketh under the sun?” (1:2–3); listless-
ness to St. Augustine of Hippo’s concept of acedia which had such a hold on the British romantics; to the agnosticism that we find in Friedrich Nietzsche, Émile Durkheim (Suicide, 1897), Freud, Sartre, and Ludwig Wittgenstein; and then through Michel Foucault, Derrida, Jean Baudrillard, and their disciples to such present-day classics as the best-selling writers Stephen King (The Stand, 1978) and Cormac McCarthy (Blood Meridian, 1985; The Road, 2006). We find deep despair in the heroic codes of old: The Babylonian Gilgamesh, the Scandinavian Beowulf (Anonymous), Widsith, The Wanderer, and The Ruin seamlessly spill over to the famous “Dance of Death” poems in the Middle Ages. In Europe we find the uselessness of trying to find meaning in life in the works of Franz Kafka (1883–1924; especially The Trial, 1925) and Luigi Pirandello (1867–1936). American literature, too, obsesses about the uselessness of life and its struggles. Famous examples are Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick (1851) and, to an extent, J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye (1951). Salinger’s teenage protagonist, Holden Caulfield, even finds it futile to consider people as individuals. He just calls everyone he meets “phonies,” much in the same way as Antoin Roquentin, the main character of Sartre’s Nausea (1938), continually feels nauseous in his utter disgust at the futility of breathing to live on. Futility also figures as a theme in non-Western literature. Whereas the Christian concept of history is forward-looking with clear divides, the Eastern sense of history is circular. In the Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain traditions, events are considered as repeating themselves endlessly. As such, God is not thought of as a separate entity as in Christianity and Islam. Hinduism sees the world itself as an emanation of the godhead, or Brahma. Thus, all sorrow is momentary and born of ignorance of our final ends and our true natures. We indeed are “amritasya putra” (Shvetashvatara Upanishad, 2.5) or “sons of the Immortal.” While Buddhism is silent about the presence of God, Jainism denies it. But in both these systems of thought, what occurs now will repeat itself in some manner later, giving eternal scope for personal and social improvements. Thus, there is present a conscious negation of futility in Eastern ancient literatures, including those written
40â•…â•… gender in Sanskrit, Pali, and Prakrit. As a result, nothing is seen as futile in the end; there are salvation and hope that every single living and nonliving being will ultimately be set free from the bondage of repetitive historical processes or Karma. This is why Sanskrit poetics eschew tragic endings, and tragedy as a genre is nonexistent in ancient India. Abhijñānashākuntala’s tragic heroine Shakuntala is saved from ultimate despair right at the last moment by the fourth- or fifth-century playwright Kalidasa. This is the norm in ancient Indian literature. While the West has a rich tradition of meditating on futility, the East has struggled to show futility as a paralyzing emotion to be discarded by the individual at all costs. The Buddha sees futility as a disease to be disposed of. We know of an anecdotal story where the Buddha exhorts one not to analyze life in a morbid manner but rather to find out ways to come out of the resultant inertia brought about by depression. The Buddha draws an analogy between an arrow-struck man and the need to heal him rather than telling him of the arrow’s origins. This is the hallmark of Eastern ancient literatures. There is no scope for Dante Alighieri’s “All hope abandon, ye who enter here” (The Divine Comedy). Futility is thus seen as a luxury we can ill afford. See also Byron, George Gordon Byron, Lord: Don Juan; Camus, Albert: Stranger, The; Eliot, T. S.: Wasteland, The; Greene, Graham: Heart of the Matter, The; Hemingway, Ernest: Sun Also Rises, The; Vonnegut, Kurt: Slaughterhouse-Five; Williams, Tennessee: Cat on a Hot Tin Roof; Yeats, William Butler: poems. FURTHER READING King James Bible Online. Available online. URL: http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org. Accessed January 22, 2010.
Subhasis Chatterjee
gender
In common usage, the word gender most typically refers to the perceived and natural differences between men and women. In literary studies, the term more specifically refers to how individuals define themselves and how they are evaluated by
others on the basis of gender. Gender is often associated with feminism (women’s activism against gendered oppression), feminists (those who study and advocate women’s equality), and Women’s Studies (interdisciplinary academic programs dedicated to the study of gender and women’s gendered oppression) because one must understand how gender functions before one can examine the oppression or lack thereof that gendered behavior entails. The study of gender is then also the study of power relationships—of how one’s gender, typically the male gender, gives one a power advantage over the other gender. Thus, founders of Women’s Studies and feminist theory such as the French psychoanalytic feminist theorists Simone de Beauvoir, Julia Kristeva, Hélène Cixous, and Luce Irigaray have helped to formulate our current understandings of gender. At the most basic level, the theories of these early psychoanalytic feminists assume that human behavior is learned and not innate. In other words, men are not necessarily more naturally aggressive. Instead, a critic applying gender theory would argue that if the majority of the men in a particular group are aggressive, this aggression is learned as part of their “gender identity” as a man. “Gender roles,” in turn, are the codes of behavior that a society expects for one gender or another. These codes are learned in childhood. According to this theory, children see adults model gender-appropriate behavior, and then their desire to be a member of that society impels them to accept the modeled behavior as the best and most appropriate for themselves and others. Adopting and practicing a “gender role” is therefore what helps an individual to construct a “gender identity” of who they are. The American philosopher Judith Butler builds on the work of these French theorists by arguing that gender is performative. Butler’s premise is that since gender entails a role, and roles are the culmination of actions, gender must also be a culmination of actions. In making this claim, Butler extends the idea that there is nothing intrinsic to gender identity by showing that an individual can vary his or her performance of gender from moment to moment. In other words, every action, every choice, be it the clothes we choose or the way in which we speak to
genderâ•…â•… 41 authority figures, is an act of choosing to perform a gender. One of her most controversial theories is that individuals only perceive themselves as having constant gender identities, when in reality every action and every choice they make is one that either confirms or violates the gender roles of a particular group. Because gender is basic to human behavior, the study of gender can be applied to any (or virtually any) social context or literary work. Thus, the focus on gender as a role has recently expanded to the social and cultural forces that shape men’s gendered behavior. Therefore, one could carry out a gender study on the masculinity of men in power, exploring how they enjoy and benefit from their performance of masculine-coded behavior. More typically, however, theorists look at male gendered behavior among oppressed groups, the ill-effects of the performance of masculinity among dominant groups, or how the male performance of gender roles has the potential to harm both men and women. Three examples of literary works—Suzan-Lori Parks’s Topdog/Underdog (2002), David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly (1998), and William Shakespeare’s Othello—as well as selected criticism on these works provide examples of scholarly gender study. In Topdog/Underdog and M. Butterfly, the authors consciously incorporate a study of gender into their creative processes. Topdog/Underdog is a play that works to explain the ill-effects of contemporary lower-class African-American male gendered roles. Because the play’s two male characters, the brothers Booth and Lincoln, are poor and largely uneducated, they face restrictions in the performance of their masculinity that wealthier, and especially wealthy Caucasian, men do not. All the men in the larger American culture depicted in the play may display their masculinity through acts of sexual virility and by dominance over men lower in status themselves. Only middle- and upper-status men can demonstrate their masculinity by flaunting their high work incomes. Because the brothers are poor and extremely low-status, they are restricted to sexual prowess and the domination of one another as the means of defining their masculinity. The ill-effects of the encompassing cultural system are shown
when their mutual attempts at domination culminate in Booth shooting Lincoln to death. M. Butterfly also looks at the expression of masculinity within oppressed groups and, as in the case of Topdog/Underdog, explores the issues of gender in combination with those of race. Here the comparison is between a sexist and racist male French diplomat, René Gallimard, and a transsexual (a person of one gender who adopts the clothing and often the mannerisms of the opposite sex gender but retains their original sexual organs) Chinese male spy, Song Lilling. The two have an enduring love affair, during which time Lilling steals various diplomatic secrets and completely conceals his male sexual organs from his French lover, despite many occasions of sexual activity. The cause of Gallimard’s misreading of Lilling’s sex is shown to be the result of Lilling’s perfect performance of what Gallimard believes to be Asian femininity. For example, Lilling apologizes for her breastless chest and begs Gallimard to love her anyway. Gallimard is so attracted to this performance of self-denigration and subordination that he fails to explore the likely physical causes for Lilling’s lack of breasts. Similarly, Lilling claims to be so shy and ashamed of her body that she will not allow Gallimard to touch her genitals or to see her/him naked. Again, Gallimard is so attracted to what he perceives as the feminine performances of shame that he does not explore other likely explanations for Lilling’s behavior. The plot’s obvious twist is that the transsexual Lilling uses the performance of subordination and femininity to gain power over a heterosexual man who enjoys performing masculine dominance. Thus, while Lilling’s behavior is not traditionally masculine, and thus would be disempowering for many men, for the character of Lilling, such performances of gender are nonetheless his means of expressing power and dominance over another man, and thus they express his masculinity. In “Men and Women in Othello,” from her book Broken Nuptials in Shakespeare’s Plays, Carol Thomas Neely looks at the gendered behavior of the men in Othello and compares it to the women’s gendered behavior. Neely evaluates a 16th-century play in terms of seeming universal gender roles and finds the men of the play to be too concerned with male honor, their ability to dominate other men, and their
42â•…â•… gender control of women’s sexuality. For example, Othello believes Iago’s lies about his wife Desdemona’s chastity because Othello is too preoccupied with what other men think of him. This need to protect his honor leads him to first murder his wife and then to commit suicide. Similarly, the play’s women are too trusting of the men and refuse to see their faults clearly. For example, Neely implies that if either Desdemona or Emilia had been able to be honest with themselves about the limitations of their husbands, Othello and Iago respectively, before Othello murdered Desdemona, the play’s tragic ending would have been averted. Despite their shared interest in gender roles and issues of race and ethnicity, a key difference between Topdog/Underdog and M. Butterfly and Shakespeare’s Othello is that in the two former plays, the authors and today’s readers are responding to the same contemporary cultural issues and influences that help to shape gender. In the case of Othello, the distance in time between author and reader means that the modern reader will almost certainly not share the same assumptions regarding gender roles and gendered behavior as the author. Critics such as Ania Loomba, following the historicist theories of Stephan Greenblatt (a school of thought often referred to as New Historicism, which holds the premise that literary study has to be based on the historical beliefs of the author’s time period), has argued that the critic always needs to keep in mind the attitudes toward gender and race in the author’s time. Indeed, the historicist argument has so resonated within the academic community that today it is the dominant factor in studying gender. Future study is likely to continue these trends, balancing the need to assess what are common gender roles over time and geographic space and what roles are more specific to one time and one place. See also Achebe, Chinua: Anthills of the Savannah; Alvarez, Julia: How the García Girls Lost Their Accents; Aristophanes: Lysistrata; Atwood, Margaret: Handmaid ’s Tale, The; Surfacing; Austen, Jane: Pride and P rejudice; Sense and Sensibility; Behn, Aphra: Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slave; Brontë, Charlotte: Jane Eyre; Brontë, Emily: Wuthering Heights; Cao Xueqin: Dream of the Red Chamber; Chaucer,
Geoffrey: Canterbury Tales, The; Cisneros, Sandra: Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories; Dos Passos, John: U.S.A. trilogy; Douglass, Frederick: Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave; DuBois, W. E. B.: Souls of Black Folk, The; Euripides: Medea; Forster, E. M.: Passage to India, A; Gaskell, Elizabeth: North and South; Gilman, Charlotte Perkins: Yellow Wallpaper, The; Glaspell, Susan: Trifles; Harte, Bret: “Luck of Roaring Camp, The”; Hemingway, Ernest: Sun Also Rises, The; Hurston, Zora Neale: Their Eyes Were Watching God; Ibsen, Henrik: Hedda Gabler; Irving, John: World According to Garp, The; Irving, Washington: Sketchbook of Geoffrey Crayon, The; Jacobs, Harriet: Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself; Kingsolver, Barbara: Bean Trees, The; Kingston, Maxine Hong: Woman Warrior, The; Lawrence, D. H.: Rainbow, The; Women in Love; Lessing, Doris: Golden Notebook, The; Malamud, Bernard: Natural, The; McMurtry, Larry: Lonesome Dove; Morrison, Toni: Sula; Naylor, Gloria: Women of Brewster Place; O’Brien, Tim: Things They Carried, The; Pope, Alexander: Rape of the Lock, The; Rhys, Jean: Wide Sargasso Sea; Rowlandson, Mary: Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson; Shakespeare, William: Much Ado about Nothing; Taming of the Shrew, The; Shaw, George Bernard: Pygmalion; Stoker, Bram: Dracula; Tan, Amy: Joy Luck Club, The; Woolf, Virginia: Mrs Dalloway; To the Lighthouse. FURTHER READING Abrahamson, Myka Tucker. “The Money Shot: Economies of Sex, Guns, and Language in Topdog/ Underdog.” Modern Drama 50, no. 1 (2007): 77–97. Beauvoir, Simone de. The Second Sex. Translated and edited by H. M. Parshley. New York: Knopf, 1953. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge, 1990. Cixous, Hélène. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Translated by Paula Cohen. Signs 1, no. 4 (1976): 875–893. Greer, Germaine. The Female Eunuch. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
griefâ•…â•… 43 ———. Sex and Destiny. New York: Harper & Row, 1984. Irigaray, Luce. This Sex Which Is Not One. Translated by Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1985. Neely, Carol Thomas. Broken Nuptials in Shakespeare’s Plays. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1985. Rich, Adrienne. Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. New York: Norton, 1976. Rossini, Jon D. “From M. Butterfly to Bondage: David Henry Hwang’s Fantasies of Sexuality, Ethnicity, and Gender.” Journal of American Drama and Theatre 18, no. 3 (2006): 54–76.
Silver Damsen
grief
Grief is arguably life’s greatest source of stress and turmoil. Our relationships with others play important roles in the development of our identities, and when those people are lost, we can feel as if we, too, are lost, unsure of who we are and how we will continue to function in a world that seems to have changed irrevocably. Grief, in short, is the mourning of a loss, usually the loss of a loved one but easily expanded to cover any loss that represents a core part of our lives. The loss of careers, mental or physical health, and pets can also trigger the difficult grieving process. This process is often disorderly and confusing, throwing the mourner into a whirlwind of emotion over which he or she has little control. Unlike other stressful emotions, grief carries such power because it calls into question how the mourner finds meaning in life. An important loss can induce us to feel that life has no meaning, because every facet of our lives—every memory, every sound, every gesture—reminds us of what we have lost. One of the difficult parts of the grieving process is putting what we are feeling into words, not just to explain our thoughts to others but also to understand what we are feeling ourselves. Literature, then, is an invaluable tool for expressing grief. Literature can employ figurative language to go deeper and to convey indescribable emotions in a way that plain language cannot. Art is one of our most valuable tools in life for expressing that which we cannot find the words to explain.
In fact, literature, especially poetry, has historically helped people to work through their grief. Elegies, poems written to commemorate a person’s death, can be great sources of solace and understanding to those in mourning. That we might need the help of poets in understanding our grief process has been long understood in the psychiatric community. Grief, by its very nature, disrupts us, places us at a loss for words. In fact, early on grief was thought of as a “psychiatric disorder,” and indeed there is evidence that grief can induce physical illness in mourners (Gilbert 255). The standard symptoms of grief are bodily distress, guilt, hostility, a preoccupation with the image of the deceased, and the alteration or loss of normal patterns of conduct (Kamerman 66). It is these last two that make grief so disruptive to the functioning mind. Because we are preoccupied with the image of the lost loved one, we find it very difficult to imagine life ever returning to normal. C. S. Lewis, in his chronicle of the loss of his wife, says, “Her absence is like the sky, spread over everything” (13). Lewis points out here that there is not one time of day or one activity or one occasion that reminds him of his loss, but that the loss pervades his every waking moment. W. H. Auden, in his poem “Funeral Blues,” explains this well, saying of his lost loved one, “he was my North, my South, my East, and my West / my working week and my Sunday rest” (ll. 9–10). Moving through grief requires a great deal of hard work on the part of the mourner. The Austrian psychiatrist Sigmund Freud noted in his influential 1917 essay “Mourning and Melancholia” that mourning takes time and mental labor to “revive, relive, and release” (quoted in MacKenzie 131). Although Freud himself did not propose the theory that the process of grief moves in stages, this essay laid the groundwork for that now commonly accepted theory. The most famous theory involving “stages of grief ” is that of the Swiss psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross. Her theory actually deals with terminally ill patients dealing with their own deaths, a process that might be called anticipatory grief, but she and others later realized it could apply to those mourning for others as well. Although different theorists have different ideas about the stages, in
44â•…â•… grief general, most agree that the opening stage is one of denial, followed by a period of anger, followed by some kind of depression or disorganization, with a final period of acceptance or reorganization. The stages do not necessarily occur in order, and they can and do overlap with one another. We can see these stages played out in works of literature. For instance, when Laurel must deal with her father’s death in Eudora Welty’s The Optimist ’s Daughter, she embarks on a journey that begins with her idealizing her childhood, includes misplaced anger at her stepmother, and ends with her acceptance of her life in the present. In one of the most famous literary expositions on grief, In Memoriam, A. H. H. by Alfred, Lord Tennyson, we see meditations on the denial of his friend’s death when he says he is having trouble accepting reality. He says, “By faith, and faith alone embrace, / Believing where we cannot prove” (ll. 3–4). By the end of the poem, however, he seems to have moved toward acceptance, saying, “Ring out the old, ring in the new / Ring happy bells, across the snow / The year is going, let him go” (ll. 103–105). Sometimes one stage or one phase of grief dominates the literature, as Homer’s The Iliad, when Achilles, in his grief over the death of Patroclus, vents his anger by cutting the throats of 12 Trojan youths, or when the soldiers in Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried savagely kill the water buffalo and burn the village in a misguided attempt to avenge the deaths of their fellow soldiers. Denial, on the other hand, takes center stage in John Updike’s Rabbit, Run, when Rabbit refuses to fully acknowledge the horrific death of his infant daughter, and in Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon, when Macon finds Ruth alone and naked with the body of her dead father. Both Rabbit and Ruth may have a hard time dealing with these deaths because they live in a culture that finds grief, mourning, and their expression embarrassing. Grief has been defined by many as an “open wound”—and others want to look away from that wound, because to acknowledge it is invariably difficult and confusing. Sandra Gilbert says about this phenomenon that “even while it wounds the mourner, the embarrassment of the
comforter is a sign of a wound for which neither mourner nor comforter has the proper language” (254). Bertha Simos calls Western society a “deathdenying culture,” noting that the social psychologist Erich Fromm has gone so far as to “suggest that the increase in violence in society today is directly related to our inability to grieve” (5). We see death denial in literary characters such as the Tyrone family in Eugene O’Neill’s Long Day’s Journey into Night, who avoid the topic of their long-dead infant son and brother and ignore their mother’s obvious grief (and subsequent morphine addiction). We see it also in the reactions others have to Septimus Warren Smith, the disturbed war veteran in Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway. Smith’s pain is an embarrassment, a fact that no one wants or knows how to deal with, and ultimately this denial kills him. The expression of grief is crucial to moving through its process, as Toni Morrison says in Sula, “The body must move and throw itself about, the eyes must roll, the hands should have no peace, and the throat should release all the yearning, despair and outrage that accompanies the stupidity of loss” (135). Occasionally, even when grief is acknowledged, mourners are unable regain a sense of normal, functioning life without their object of loss. Psychologists call this “exceptional” or “pathological” grief, and characters entrenched in this state make appearances in literature as well. Ophelia, for instance, in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, cannot fathom the death of her father, Polonius, especially coupled with the emotional torment she is receiving from Hamlet, and, losing her grasp on reality, she drowns herself. Sethe, in Morrison’s Beloved, is so disturbed by her grief over having killed her daughter that she is haunted by the ghost of this loved one for most of her adult life. Perhaps most disturbing is when the adult ghost of Beloved returns to wreak havoc on Sethe’s life, to demand complete subservience to her at the expense of Sethe’s relationships with Paul D. and with Denver, her living child. Sethe should recognize this, that Denver, a child fully part of this world, should take precedence over the otherworldly Beloved; that she takes so long to do so demonstrates the depth of her grief. Of all the themes in literature, grief is perhaps the only one that can serve to illuminate the nature
guiltâ•…â•… 45 of the theme itself by acting, as a form of therapy to readers who might be in mourning themselves. See also Chaucer, Geoffrey: Canterbury Tales, The; Faulkner, William: Sound and the Fury, The; Shelley, Percy Bysshe: poems. FURTHER READING Gilbert, Sandra. Death’s Door: Modern Dying and the Ways We Grieve. New York: Norton, 2006. Kamerman, Jack B. Death in the Midst of Life: Social and Cultural Influences on Death, Grief, and Mourning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1988. Kirkby, Joan. “A Crescent Still Abides.” In Wider than the Sky: Essays and Meditations on the Healing Power of Emily Dickinson, edited by Cindy MacKenzie and Barbara Dana, 129–141. Kent, Ohio: Kent University Press, 2007. Lewis, C. S. (as N. W. Clerk). A Grief Observed. London: Faber, 1961. Morrison, Toni. Sula. New York: Plume, 2002. Simos, Bertha G. A Time to Grieve. New York: Family Service Association of America, 1979.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
guilt
When we hurt someone, we usually feel guilty. If the hurt was committed deliberately, this is understandable. However, many of us can feel guilt even when the hurt is inadvertent. Human beings are also capable of feeling guilt merely for existing when others have died, or for being born wealthy when others live in poverty. Guilt, at its heart, reflects a transgression, a crossing of boundaries. Societies have rules, written and unwritten, and when we break those rules, we often feel guilty unless and until we can effect restitution or restore harmony. Guilt is so fundamental to human existence that it makes an appearance as early as the book of Genesis, the first book of the Bible. God tells Adam and Eve that they are free to do what they wish, as long as they keep his only rule: that they will not eat from the fruit of the tree in the middle of the Garden of Eden. Yet they do, thanks to the serpent’s temptations, and they are banished from the garden forever. Their lasting punishment, though, is that the “eyes of them both were opened” (Gen. 3:7). Further, they have generated what would come to be known
as original sin. The notion of original sin is that because of Adam’s and Eve’s transgression, we are all born as sinners, guilty from the start. Adam and Eve had only one rule to follow, and they broke it. For the rest of us, the rules we must follow in life are legion, as well as far more difficult to know and discern at all times throughout our lives. Because we cannot control when and if we might be transgressing, guilt pervades human existence. We can be under the thrall of collective guilt, as is the society depicted in Günter Grass’s The Tin Drum. Guilt over the Holocaust is so pervasive in Grass’s post–World War II Danzig that his protagonist, Oskar, refuses to grow up and enter the world of complicitous and duplicitous adults. We can also be following the “rules” of our society and still find ourselves feeling guilty. For instance, soldiers who kill in battle have, on the surface, done nothing for which to feel guilty; they are merely doing their jobs, following their orders. However, many of them can and do feel guilty about the killing they do, as exemplified by Paul Berlin in Tim O’Brien’s Going after Cacciato. Berlin is following the rules, and yet he feels guilty; Cacciato has broken the rules by going AWOL, and yet he is depicted as happy and free. We may also, like Dunstan Ramsey in Robertson Davies’s Fifth Business, feel guilty about events that we were involved in but were not our fault. Dunny feels guilt his whole life for ducking the snowball that hit Mrs. Dempster. That he is never able to fully make restitution to her is most likely a result of it not having been his fault in the first place. That guilt is a complicated concept, often felt irrationally, is clear. That it pervades Western culture is no less so. As recounted above, the concept of original sin makes us all “born guilty.” Christianity certainly bears a good deal of responsibility for making guilt so important in our lives. The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche argues that guilt has its origins in a creditor and debtor concept of human relationships. He argues that it is in these types of relationships that we break the rules for which we must make restitution. He further argues that Christianity is based on such a relationship, with Jesus Christ’s sacrifice on the cross serving to put all humanity in “debt.” If Nietzsche is correct,
46â•…â•… guilt then the guilt we feel due to original sin is compounded by our need to repay Jesus for his sacrifice. Indeed, religion has historically played an important role in the development of the concept of guilt. Arthur Dimmesdale, in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, is a good example of guilt driven by religious beliefs. The Puritan code under which Dimmesdale lives confines him so that he cannot admit his affair with Hester (who cannot hide the evidence that she has sinned). Although engaging in adultery would certainly break the rules of his society, he is so stifled that he further compounds his guilt by refusing to admit the truth and claim Pearl as his child. Hester, on the other hand, is not consumed with guilt, adhering to her own moral code, which appears more natural in comparison. For some, Christianity puts too much emphasis on the sinful (and thus guilty) nature of human beings. This is arguably a distortion of the message of Jesus Christ, which emphasizes love and goodwill toward other humans. One explanation for this distorted emphasis is that for Christian leaders, keeping their flocks “in line” is one of their most arduous tasks. Convincing the faithful that they must constantly atone in order to be admitted to the kingdom of Heaven keeps them from complacency. In “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” Jonathan Edwards elucidates the horrors of hell, invoking the wrathful Old Testament God rather than the New Testament Christ. This has the effect of scaring the listeners into prayer, which will help to balance their inherently guilty natures. This balance, which can also be described as a kind of repayment, is what differentiates guilt from its close counterpart, shame. The American philosopher John Rawls believed that in order to experience guilt, another must have been harmed in some way. Guilt, said Rawls, is also localized—that is, it is about our transgressions—whereas shame is about who we think we are as people. Thus, repayment and punishment are appropriate only to guilt, not shame. Hamlet, in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, feels guilty that he cannot immediately avenge his father’s death. He says, Yet I, A dull and muddy-mettled rascal, peak,
Like John-a-dreams, unpregnant of my cause, And can say nothing; no, not for a king, Upon whose property and most dear life A damn’d defeat was made. (2.2.566–571) He resolves to reveal Claudius’s guilt and kill him, thus ending his own guilt, repaying his father as it were. In Edith Wharton’s Ethan Frome, Ethan spends his entire life unable to escape his loveless marriage. He feels guilty, first because he does not love Zeena and then because he has fallen in love with Mattie. He then spends his life punishing himself by staying married to Zeena. Ironically, when he tries to end his life (and Mattie’s) things go horribly wrong and he is further doomed, trapped as an invalid being taken care of by Zeena, consumed by guilt over what has happened both to her and to Mattie. Ethan ends his life unable to restore the balance created by his transgressions in love. Sethe, in Toni Morrison’s Beloved, is also unable to restore the balance. She murdered her child to keep her from slavery, and her guilt haunts her, literally, in the form of Beloved. Sethe tries to assuage this guilt by showering Beloved with attention, but her growing obsession with this manifestation of her dead daughter threatens to kill her. The horrors of slavery have wrought crimes so great no balance can be restored. The community comes together to exorcise the ghost and help Sethe to move on. The destructive behavior that Sethe exhibits is common for those suffering from guilt feelings. According to the psychologist E. Mark Stern, guilt that is long-lasting and preoccupying can interfere with our cognition and promote additional self-destructive behaviors. Stern demonstrates that this behavior contributes to a vicious cycle, stating that “the more a person blames himself or herself for unacceptable behavior, the more unacceptable behavior the person will perform” (260). The Scarlet Letter’s Dimmesdale is an example of this kind of self-destructive cycle. He tortures himself, carving his own scarlet letter into his breast and wasting away from the torments through which he puts himself. In Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre, Mr. Rochester, too, hides himself away in lonely despair
heroismâ•…â•… 47 after he is blinded by the fire at Thornfeld Hall. His guilt stems from his locking away Bertha, as well as from his deception of Jane, and he compounds his guilt by hiding in his damaged mansion, doing nothing to restore the balance upset by his transgressions. While some literary characters are undone by guilt, others seem impervious to it, acting as if they are conscience-free. In fact, the sense of guilt is so fundamental to the human condition that one must assume something is wrong at the core of those who can commit evil and feel nothing. For instance, Iago in Shakespeare’s Othello and Chillingsworth in The Scarlet Letter wreak havoc on all those around them, bent only on achieving their own goals, which in Iago’s case is power and in Chillingsworth’s is revenge. Given Sigmund Freud’s theory of the id, the ego, and the superego, in which the id is our primitive impulses, the superego is morality tempering those impulses, and the ego is the mechanism that mediates between the two, these characters would seem to be missing an important part of their psyches. Characters such as these, as well as characters whose lives are spent controlled by guilt, can function as cautionary tales for the reader. Guilt is an important part of human personality, but when it takes over a life, that life may not be worth living. See also Bunyan, John: Pilgrim’s P rogress, The; Davis, Rebecca Harding: Life in the Iron Mills; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor: Crime and Punishment; Hardy, Thomas: Tess of the d ’Urbervilles; Irving, John: World According to Garp, The; Kingsolver, Barbara: Poisonwood Bible, The; Knowles, John: Separate Peace, A; O’Brien, Tim: Things They Carried, The; O’Neill, Eugene: Long Day’s Journey into Night; Poe, Edgar Allan: “Tell-Tale Heart, The”; Shakespeare, William: Julius Caesar; Macbeth; Turgenev, Ivan: Fathers and Sons. FURTHER READING Stern, E. Mark. Psychotherapy and the Remorseful Patient. New York: Haworth, 1988. Taylor, Gabrielle. Pride, Shame, and Guilt: Emotions of Self-Assessment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
heroism
The word hero is commonly applied to many different types of people performing wildly varying acts. For instance, extraordinary acts of physical strength and courage, such as saving a stranger from a burning house or standing up to an armed assailant, are feats we would typically label heroic. Physical courage is not the only component of heroism, however. Those who exhibit moral courage, such as people who put their own lives or reputations at stake to do or say what is right, rather than what is merely popular, are also called heroes. Heroes can also be those close friends or loved ones whom we admire and treat as role models, calling such a person “my hero.” We routinely use the term for our popular and talented sports figures as well, whether or not their behavior off the playing field can be considered heroic. We even use it to refer to people who are inspirations to others, inspirations that do not necessarily hinge on physical strength or moral superiority. With all of these varied uses, clearly explaining the allure of heroism as a literary theme is difficult. Compounding that difficulty is the fact that in literary studies, the term hero is used to refer to the central character of a work. John Dryden first used the term this way in 1697, and it is still commonly accepted as a synonym for protagonist, even when the protagonist does nothing particularly heroic. We have long used the word heroic to refer to acts that are special or extraordinary. The exploits of professional athletes, the life-saving missions of soldiers and firefighters, the bravery of whistleblowers, and even the lives of fictional characters in our most cherished works of literature seem, in our minds, to certify them as “heroes.” Getting at the heart of what qualifies behavior as heroic may explain why Dryden’s arguable misuse of the term has had such staying power. The word hero is of Greek origin, and in Greek mythology it referred to those who were favored by the gods or had “godlike” qualities. The Oxford English Dictionary describes heroes as “men of super human strength, courage, or ability.” The emphasis here is on super, an adjective that suggests heroism goes beyond what human beings are expected to do. Friedrich Nietzsche’s theory of the übermensch (sometimes translated as “superman”) speaks to this concept of going beyond
48â•…â•… heroism human ability. Nietzsche, a 19th-century German philosopher, wrote in Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883) that in the modern world, God, or the concept of God, had ceased to give life meaning. This void, he wrote, could be filled by the übermensch, a superior, transcendent human being who would give new meaning to life. All could seek to reach this status, thus creating a world in which all were motivated by a love of the present world and the present time. The Scottish historian Thomas Carlyle, writing in 1840, would agree that the heroism must be lifeaffirming, although he would not agree that religion had ceased to give life meaning. In fact, in On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History, he wrote that “all religions stand upon” the worship of heroes, and that Jesus Christ could be considered the “greatest of all heroes” (249). Carlyle goes on to set up criteria for what makes a hero or a heroic action: He says a hero must conquer fear, otherwise he is acting as but a “slave and coward” (268). Further, he must be earnest and sincere and have a vision that penetrates beyond what the average eye might see (281, 325). Finally, he must be an inspiration to others, someone who can “light the way” (347). As Carlyle was one of the first to write on the subject seriously, many of his criteria have lasted and are reinforced by theorists of the present day. Joseph Campbell, who has written some of the best-known works on mythology and heroism, echoes Carlyle when he says: “The hero, therefore, is the man or woman who has been able to battle past his [or her] personal and local limitations to the generally valid, normally human forms” (30). In other words, heroes begin life as normal people, but through some extraordinary gift, they are able to begin on and succeed at the journey upon which they will prove their heroism. Carlyle and Campbell both stress that human beings need heroes—that our response to them satisfies a basic human impulse. We need, apparently, the inspiration and motivation derived from believing there are heroes in the world to whose example we may aspire. The psychologist Miriam F. Polster, writing in 1992 about female heroes, compiled a roster of qualities culled from qualities ascribed to heroes over time. Recalling Nietzsche’s übermensch, she notes that they are “motivated by a profound respect for
human life,” that their vision of what is possible goes beyond that of others, that they possess great courage, and that they are not motivated by public opinion (22). She cites as one of her examples Antigone, from Sophocles’ play Antigone, who at great personal risk to herself buries the body of her brother Polynices against the wishes of her uncle, the king. Antigone is a hero here because her driving motivation is respect for her brother’s life. She knows she must honor this life, even in death. Polster goes on to note that hero and heroism are words that have long been associated with men because of the popular focus on physical courage and strength. Indeed, the word first appeared in Homer’s The Iliad, when the name was given to all those who had participated in the Trojan Wars and about whom a story could be told. But, as Carlyle and Campbell both stress, possessing great moral courage is just as rare and should be honored with as much fervor. For example, in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre, Jane displays more moral courage than anyone in the novel, standing by her friend Charlotte Temple, standing up to her evil Aunt Reed, refusing to marry St. John Rivers because she is not in love with him, and returning to the injured Mr. Rochester. Jane’s efforts are consistently heroic because they affirm life, they are selfless, and they inspire others to good. In contrast, Henry Fleming’s actions in Stephen Crane’s The Red Badge of Courage are not so consistent. Fleeing his first battle, Fleming acts only out of fear. However, when he returns to battle a changed man, Crane seems to suggest that he is still acting out of fear. He is now motivated by his desire not to be seen as a coward. Tim O’Brien, author of the Vietnam War novels Going after Cacciato and The Things They Carried, has asserted that men have killed and died “because they were afraid not to.” This is exactly the point of Crane’s treatment of heroism: that it is complicated, is hard to discern, and can carry with it a great deal of ambiguity. Henry Fleming is a soldier, and physical acts of courage such as those displayed in war have long been the province of heroism. But what of ordinary people, those whose daily lives do not place them in typically “heroic” situation? Can these people exhibit heroism as well? For example, in John Updike’s
hopeâ•…â•… 49 “A&P,” Sammy, the supermarket cashier who tells the story, abruptly quits his job when his manager is disrespectful to three teenaged girls who enter the store. In the grand scheme of things, this action might not seem noteworthy. But in the world of the A&P, it certainly is. To return to some of the criteria discussed above, Sammy has respect for life and respect for the present in that he does not want to simply carry on as though nothing has happened. He wants to acknowledge the girls’ worth as human beings and not simply see them as “sheep” like the other people in the store. Also, Sammy has vision. He does not want the A&P to be his life; he is thinking of the future and how he can contribute toward it in a more meaningful way than he would standing behind the cash register. Heroic behavior can also come from those whom we might not see as typically “good” people. Sometimes, the term antihero is used for these characters. In John Gay’s The Beggar’s Opera, Macheath is a thief and a murderer. He “marries” several women under false pretenses and exhibits little regard for the laws of the city. However, Macheath is arguably a hero because the system within which he operates is so corrupt and bereft of compassion itself that the audience actually roots for him to beat that system. He has his own moral code, and he sticks by it. Looked at from this perspective, one can easily see how Macheath’s daring actions might be seen as heroic. There is quite a leap from a character such as Macheath to a character such as Sammy the checker. And again, there is another great leap from Sammy to characters such as Jane Eyre and Antigone. However, all of these characters exhibit behavior that is inspirational, courageous, and extraordinary, and in doing so all of them exemplify the theme of heroism. See also Achebe, Chinua: Things Fall Apart; Allende, Isabel: House of the Spirits, The; Atwood, Margaret: Handmaid ’s Tale, The; Behn, Aphra: Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slave; Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan: Hound of the Baskervilles, The; Conrad, Joseph: Lord Jim; Dickens, Charles: Tale of Two Cities, A; Douglass, Frederick: Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave; Fielding, Henry: Tom Jones; Heller, Joseph: Catch-22;
Hersey, John: Hiroshima; Homer: Odyssey, The; Hinton S. E.: Outsiders, The; Kesey, Ken: One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest; Lewis, C. S.: Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, The; Malamud, Bernard: Natural, The; McMurtry, Larry: Lonesome Dove; Orwell, George: Nineteen Eighty-Four; Rand, Ayn: Anthem; Sophocles: Oedipus the King; Stevenson, Robert Louis: Treasure Island; Synge, John Millington: Playboy of the Western World, The; Tolkien, J. R. R.: Hobbit, The; Lord of the Rings, The; Virgil: Aeneid, The. FURTHER READING Campbell, Joseph. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1949, 1968. Carlyle, Thomas. On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History. 1908. Reprint, London and Toronto: J. M. Dent, 1924. Polster, Miriam F. Eve’s Daughters. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
hope
Hope is closely related to desire, faith, and possibility. Stories about hope are central not only to the study of literature but also to psychology, social movements, and religious studies. In literature, hope tends to center on the belief that positive change— either individual or societal change—can or will occur. Hope is an exceptionally common theme in literary works for several reasons. The theme of hope directly addresses one of the foremost characteristics of human experiences: anxiety about the uncertainty of the future. Furthermore, many literary works have plot events spurred on by characters that pursue something they want. Hope of attaining a goal is thus a central part of almost any traditionally structured novel or play. Holding onto hope when confronting seemingly impossible odds is another important theme in many texts; hope in these cases may be closely related to faith in human nature, faith in oneself, or religious or spiritual faith. Additionally, hope can be both an emotional state and also a perspective on reality; as the latter, hope is an example
50â•…â•… hope of how a worldview can shape one’s actions, often in profound and life-affirming ways. In Greek mythology, “Hope” is part of the story of Pandora’s box. After Prometheus stole fire from the gods and gave it to humans, Zeus gave Pandora as a “gift” to Prometheus’s brother, but she was actually a punishment for Prometheus’s crime. Out of curiosity, Pandora opens a box (or jar) containing all the world’s evils—diseases, envy, vengeance, and more—and thereby lets them loose upon the human race. The evils spread throughout the world, but Pandora manages to close the lid before the last one—Hope—escapes. The myth provides an explanation of why hope remains even when all other ills seem to be insurmountable. Some versions also suggest that Hope was by far the most important to keep in the box; if Hope escaped from human possession, human beings would have no way to cope with all the other ills, because without hope human existence would be unbearable. Hope is also a central theme in the JudeoChristian tradition, and it is especially notable in the Bible in Exodus, Psalms, and the Gospels. Other hope-centered works include stories of the lives of saints as well as the larger body of religious-themed works in Western and related literatures. Often the emphasis is on the hope for salvation or deliverance; this may be the hope for eternal life, for the coming of the Messiah, for deliverance from sin, or for other forms of spiritual or religious salvation; these narratives are often connected to hope for earthly deliverance from persecution, one’s enemies, great hardships, or even the material world and the limitations and desires of the human body. Narratives of the miraculous often emphasize that hoping for the impossible, or for what merely seems impossible according to earthly knowledge, is a sign of one’s moral rectitude and spiritual faith. This emphasis can also be seen in genres that lean a little more toward the secular, such as medieval romances about the quests of Arthurian knights. In these stories, hope is an important part of moral character because it stands fast in times of great adversity, and because it allows courage to triumph over fear. Hope in the Western Christian tradition is also one of the three Christian virtues (or the three
theological virtues), which are faith, hope, and charity. These virtues are sometimes personified as three sisters whose mother is Wisdom. The personification of the virtues (of varying number) is also found in many medieval works of literature. For example, Hope is a character in Hildegard von Bingen’s Order of the Virtues (ca. 1151), which is sometimes called the first morality play as well as the first European opera. In it, a human woman must choose between the virtuous way of life and the temptations of the devil; Hope therefore is part of the victory of good over evil. St. Thomas Aquinas, who founded the discourse on the three theological virtues, similarly argues that hope is a virtue that keeps one tending toward the divine and spiritual rather than focusing on fear and despair. It is notable in these religious traditions that despite the importance of hope to individual believers, the fundamental or underlying hope is for the ultimate deliverance to or reconciliation with God of all of Creation. The use of light or fire as a symbol for hope is seen in both Judeo-Christian and other traditions. Light is used as a symbol not only for life but also for the hope of renewal or restoration of what has been lost or separated; it may be for this reason that winter celebrations often use light or fire to symbolize hope that the spring (and new life) is on its way. This imagery of light as a symbol for both hope and life may also be seen in the metaphorical use of the phrase “the light at the end of the tunnel,” as well as literary works such as Dylan Thomas’s villanelle “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” (1951). Many authors and scholars have considered the nature of hope. In his 1732 Essay on Man, Alexander Pope writes: “Hope springs eternal in the human breast.” (1.95) Emily Dickinson writes of the beauty, comfort, and constancy of hope in a poem usually identified by its first line, “↜‘Hope’ is the thing with feathers.” More recently, the author Barbara Ehrenreich has argued that the constant pressure to demonstrate a hopeful attitude is part of the “cult of positivity” that places an undue psychological burden on those who must suffer silently and absolves those with the power to lessen suffering; she uses her experiences as a cancer patient to argue that “[t] o be hope-free is to acknowledge the lion in the tall
hopeâ•…â•… 51 grass, the tumor in the CAT scan, and to plan one’s moves accordingly” (11). The Czech playwright and essayist Václav Havel defines hope differently, however, describing it as “a dimension of the soul .╯.╯. not essentially dependent on some particular observation of the world or estimate of the situation.╯.╯.╯. It transcends the world that is immediately experienced, and is anchored somewhere beyond its horizons.╯.╯.╯. Hope .╯.╯. is not the same as joy that things are going well .╯.╯. but, rather, an ability to work for something because it is good, not just because it stands a chance to succeed” (181). The American philosopher Cornel West cites Havel to expand on the distinction between hope and optimism, arguing that hope is far more profound and significant, and that it is acting in a belief even when there is no reasonable expectation of success. Clearly, the more dire the situation, the more important it is to maintain hope; wilderness survival experts often emphasize that keeping one’s hopes up is absolutely imperative. A literary example that shows the importance of hope to survival is Homer’s The Odyssey. Odysseus must maintain hope for his eventual return home, and for reunification with his wife and son, through 10 years of war followed by 10 years of hardship and danger while lost at sea. Even as gods and various supernatural beings conspire against his return, as disaster after disaster hits him, and even when every other member of his crew is killed, Odysseus keeps his eye set on his homecoming. His wife, Penelope, undergoes a similar story at their home in Ithaca as she holds on to hope that her presumed-dead husband will return, and she cleverly works to stall the aggressive suitors who conspire against her family. Again, hope is necessary for maintaining courage, dedication, and perseverance, which suggests that it is a fundamental survival skill. On the other hand, some works of literature critique or even mock those who cling to foolish or unrealistic hopes. Often, those who encourage false hope are portrayed as cruel, while those who refuse to let go of their futile hopes are portrayed as pompous or lacking in self-awareness. In William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, for instance, several characters play a prank on Malvolio, a self-
important steward, by fooling him into thinking he might reasonably hope to woo Olivia, a countess. Ironically, one of the pranksters, Sir Andrew Aguecheek, is also completely mistaken when he believes that he might succeed in wooing Olivia, and he is encouraged by his “friends” who hope to take advantage of his wealth. Olivia, after a long period of mourning and despair for a deceased family member, finally finds hope for a happy future in her infatuation with “Cesario”; she, of course, will never be able to marry “him” because “Cesario” is actually a woman disguised as a man, and such a marriage would have been impossible. Through these and other relationships, the play portrays love and romance as a series of false and foolish hopes followed by confusion, compromise, and often bitter disappointment. Closely related to false hope are the themes of hopelessness, futility, and despair. In literature, hopelessness may be portrayed as an internal obstacle a character must overcome (or be destroyed by). Alternately, literary works with a more cynical or even a nihilistic perspective may portray hope as a foolish or childlike trait with no basis in reality. For example, in Samuel Beckett’s play Waiting for Godot (1953), Vladimir and Estragon wait, futilely, for the arrival of Godot. They are stuck in the same place, longing for meaning, movement, or answers, but their hopes and words are useless in altering their situation. The play suggests that existence itself is absurd and without meaning, like a game of language, and to hope otherwise is foolish. Tom Stoppard’s play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead (1966) which is heavily influenced by Beckett, portrays the futility of hope in a similar fashion. The title characters, which were originally very minor characters in Hamlet, are both sympathetic and absurd in their attempts to evade their fate, but their ending has already been written (literally). Hope for the future, however, is necessary for courage and perseverance, especially when one’s cause seems dangerous, unsustainable, or impossible. Social movements of all kinds therefore depend on the hope that their efforts and sacrifices have not been and will not be for nothing. Especially important is the hope that the actions of a person or group can make the leap to actions of historical import; a
52â•…â•… hope sense of hopelessness, on the other hand, makes it nearly impossible—and seemingly pointless—for groups or individuals to continue their efforts. It is no surprise, then, that hope is an important theme in many works of social or political commentary in literature. Readers often expect that books that critique the status quo will offer suggestions for change and encourage a sense of hope for the future. Some literary works do so, while some actively subvert this expectation. Utopian literature is often quite hopeful about the possibility of a far better world, whereas dystopian literature, such as Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World or Yevgeny Zamyatin’s We, often portrays a future world that seems hopeless. The very premise of dystopian fiction may, however, imply hope for change; the books stand as calls to action to prevent such a dystopian future from ever coming about, which suggests that some degree of hope remains. One complication in the representation of hope in politically oriented books is that literary works are often intended less as conventional arguments and more as explorations, or experiments in imagining possibilities; in simpler terms, literary genres may be better suited for raising new questions than for arguing for a position without ambiguity or contradiction. Furthermore, socially engaged literature often reveals the inequalities, injustices, and power relations of everyday life, many of which go unnoticed or are thought irrelevant to larger historical factors. When showing the extent, degree, and pervasiveness of these injustices, books often must address how (or whether) one preserves hope in the face of such farreaching problems. Some authors who discuss social change end their books not with a stereotypical sense of upbeat hope but with a more complex discussion of hope and possibility. Jamaica Kincaid’s A Small Place discusses the lasting impact of British colonialism in Antigua and elsewhere, as well as issues such as globalization, class inequalities, racism, and government corruption. The book ends with a meditation on the ambiguity of hope; it suggests that the global changes and individual failings that make oppression harder to identify, harder to resist, and harder to escape may also allow for new possibilities for human (and humane) connections.
Clearly, many works of literature explore how hope relates to imagination; hope, after all, fundamentally depends on the ability to see beyond the present circumstances. Tony Kushner’s two-part play Angels in America is particularly concerned with this relationship as it depicts the character of Prior Walter, who faces AIDS, his ancestors, angelic visitors, and abandonment by his partner. Other characters also struggle for hope and restoration as the play deals with sexuality, politics, history, and religion, as well as the medical and institutional limitations of the 1980s that made treatments for AIDS largely ineffective. In addition to angels, there are ghosts, hallucinations, and a visit to heaven, all of which push characters into expanding their sense of what is possible. More down-to-earth confrontations among characters have this effect as well, often throwing characters’ worldviews into tumult. The spiritual and psychological value of imagination, and the ability to envision what others cannot or will not, relates directly to these characters’ experiences of hope or of despair and fear. Furthermore, in this play, hope often springs from the capacity to imagine and acknowledge surprising connections between vastly different individuals—and also the connections between heaven and earth, between sex and politics, and between the past, present, and future. By the end, many of the characters break into a new stage in their lives that they never imagined possible; most notably, Prior not only copes with the abandonment but also fulfills the prophesy that he would live years longer than anyone thought possible. Angels in America is thus part of a larger trend in which authors find hope in times of great upheaval by suggesting that chaos, in addition to its ill effects, offers many opportunities for transformation. The connection between hope and imagination is thus bound tightly to the relationship between hope and survival. For this reason, it may be possible to generalize that books that discuss the relationships among hope, imagination, perseverance, and the capacity to survive and thrive implicitly argue that works of the imagination (such as literature) are vital to the wellbeing of individuals and societies. See also Aristophanes: Lysistrata; Bierce, Ambrose: “Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge, An”; Chekhov, Anton: Seagull, The; Davis,
identityâ•…â•… 53 Rebecca Harding: Life in the Iron Mills; Dickens, Charles: Great Expectations; Frank, Anne: Anne Frank: Diary of a Young Girl; Hersey, John: Hiroshima; Lawrence, Jerome, and Robert E. Lee: Inherit the Wind; Naipaul, V. S.: Bend in the River, A; O’Neill, Eugene: Iceman Cometh, The; Tolkien, J. R. R.: Lord of the Rings, The; Voltaire: Candide. FURTHER READING Cartwright, John. “From Aquinas to Zwelethemba: A Brief History of Hope.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 592, no. 1 (2004): 166–184. Ehrenreich, Barbara. “Pathologies of Hope.” Harper’s Magazine (February 2007): 9–12. Eliott, Jaklin. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Hope. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers, 2005. Havel, Václav. Disturbing the Peace: A Conversation with Karel Hvížd’ala. Translated by Paul Wilson. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1990. Keyes, Flo. The Literature of Hope in the Middle Ages and Today: Connections in Medieval Romance, Modern Fantasy, and Science Fiction. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland and Company, 2006. West, Cornel. Commencement Address at Wesleyan University. Middletown, Conn., May 30, 1993.
Ellen Moll
identity
The nature of textual creation from a blank page— of all creation, really—is an exercise in identity politics: Each entity fashioned depends on inclusions and exclusions. Thus, literary texts achieve selfhood via the delicate balance of their various constituent parts; just as humans are products of their DNA, so are literary texts the result of the countless phenomena occurring between their covers. They are unique entities, themselves possessing a sort of identity to which we, as readers, bring our own experiences and resultant identities, therewith interacting to produce a distinct and original product: our individual, respective interpretations of a text. Hence, literature serves as a conduit not only to the world in which an author writes but also to our very selves. Naturally, this idea of self—of who we are—plays an important role in the dissection of literature as it is very
active during our consideration of texts. Examining this interaction further, literary theorists and critics add another wrinkle by advocating myriad different critical approaches by which to dissect a given document. Marxists focus on the manner in which societal institutions determine consciousness, and, therefore, identity: New Historicists view the text as a representative product of a certain time and place; psychoanalysts seek the unwritten text, interpreting the significance of absence; and many, many more urge their respective techniques for interrogating literature, which is, after all, a function of identity formulation. Regardless of approach, however, one thing is clear: English letters have, throughout the years, approached questions of identity in myriad different ways. The texts that constitute the genesis of Western literary studies pose questions of identity via their rootings in conflict. Homer’s The Iliad and The Odyssey, Beowulf (Anonymous)—the cornerstone documents of the field wage war with nearly every word. And while bloodshed presents itself often in these seminal works, on a more abstract level, it is the struggle that has prime significance. The drawing of battle lines and national boundaries affords both the author and the reader the opportunity to choose sides—to ask: Where do I stand? With whom am I? And concurrent to consideration of these spatial and philosophical concerns is the broader question of, simply, who am I? Along with battle, another way humans attempt to define themselves is through religion, and this has certainly been demonstrated in literature. Of course, the significance of the Bible itself cannot be overstated, but neither can the subsequent works of fiction that sought to allegorize Christianity for the purpose of providing direction and, concurrently, identity to their readers. Texts such as William Langland’s Piers Plowman and John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s P rogress feature “everyman” protagonists struggling against the pressures of temptation and sin in a post-Fall world, whereas religious ecstasy is sought in the poetry of George Herbert and Robert Herrick. Thus, whereas conflict for one’s selfhood can, as demonstrated by Homer and others, present itself externally, strife can nevertheless rage within as
54â•…â•… identity well, and religious commitment has played a major role in this issue. Identity as a product of one’s relationship with the Almighty aside, temporal matters persist nevertheless. As geography, racial identity, and religious fervor organized cultures into nation states that legitimized themselves across Europe, people began to focus on their immediate surroundings in order to establish a more stable sense of self. Enter William Shakespeare, whose examination of British (and greater European) court life in many of his plays closely inspects not merely how we have come to occupy our places in society, but the economic, political, cultural, and social repercussions of the manner in which we have arranged ourselves. That is, the army of Rome or God aside, identity can also be derived from one’s societal position. In the 17th century, however, the poet John Donne, called this entire social framework into question with his own metaphysical take on existence and identity. As the Renaissance, during which Shakespeare and Donne wrote, ushered in various scientific and technological innovations, the speed of life increased, and this acceleration eventually resulted in the Industrial Revolution of the early 19th century. The romantic period, led by William Wordsworth, sought to counter this movement grounded in commercialism, doing so by harkening back to simpler times, places, and lifestyles. The rebellion against ever-expanding industrialization romanticized the simplicity of yesteryear, and in favoring the rustic cottage over urban bustle, reactionary romantics promoted an identity based on the pastoral and the past—an identity, they maintained, that was worth resurrecting. Romanticism in the United States prospered as well, as authors looked to the past to answer a fundamental question plaguing the new nation: Just what—who—is an American? Unlike Britons, whose country had demonstrated sovereignty for more than half the years since Christ, Americans had problematic issues with which to contend: They were, after all, a nation born of Great Britain but liberated with the help of France; a place rooted in equality, yet devoted to slavery and class divides; and a state inspired by a yearning for religious freedom that already sported a less-than-tolerant record on
tolerance. These early obstacles to a cohesive identity demanded consideration, and the country’s early literary endeavors did not disappoint. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s interest in history facilitated his own approach to this enigma, producing introspective tales such as The House of the Seven Gables, and Herman Melville’s fictive microcosms endeavored to inspect the American identity as well (Moby-Dick, “Bartleby, the Scrivener,” Billy Budd, Sailor, and Benito Cereno come readily to mind). The romantic mindset also fostered the American transcendentalist movement, which radically challenged contemporary religious thought by proclaiming that divinity presided in each and every person. But times change, and violent conflict and its pursuant debilitating recessions tend to alter the way a citizenry views itself. Therefore, transcendentalism, with all its hope and possibility, gave way to the prostitute- and drunkard-ridden slums of the realists Stephen Crane (The Open Boat and The Red Badge of Courage) and Theodore Dreiser (An American Tragedy and Sister Carrie) and the harsh reality of 19th-century London we find in Charles Dickens. In a few deft literary strokes, humans went from Gods to insignificant specks. War, however, need not always precipitate humility. Whereas the Civil War rattled America’s literary girders, the interwar period of the 20th century inspired the dynamism and innovation of the modern period. T. S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, H.D. (Hilda Doolittle), Langston Hughes, Robinson Jeffers, and others rewrote national myths, questioning the very notion of patriotic allegiance itself. Coping with a dramatically and rapidly changing world left them eager for new ways to artistically express an ever-morphing self they sought to articulate. Hence, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Nick Carraway seems lost in both his adopted home on the eastern seaboard and back in his native Midwest in The Great Gatsby, thereby anticipating J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, in which Holden Caulfield ambles, stupefied, through a New York City that, while geographically holding true to his home, nevertheless seems odd, off—different. In The Sound and the Fury, William Faulkner’s Compsons and McCaslins even seem out of place in their own
illnessâ•…â•… 55 Mississippi homes, which have been in their respective families for generations. Modernists entertained new approaches to a newly emergent self, which, although complex (as in Ezra Pound’s epic, and fittingly, unfinished, Cantos), at least presupposed that definable identity could exist. For the postmodernists who followed, this was not necessarily a given. The postmodern age, in which most would agree we now live, takes nothing for granted, rejecting the notion that an underlying absolute truth inevitably exists. Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, for instance, features a central character named Tim O’Brien who is not necessarily the author (but is not necessarily not the author, either); claims that the most far-fetched tales are “real,” whereas those that sound the most believable are pure invention; includes stories of soldiers in Vietnam that have nothing to do with war and accounts of men in Minnesota that have everything to do with conflict; and even defies simple generic classification as either a novel or a short-story collection. Toni Morrison’s Beloved deconstructs the objectivity of time, agency, and place. Burgeoning magical realism, as found in Gabriel García Márquez’s One Hundred Years of Solitude routinely presents seemingly supernatural events as quotidian, based on the idea that assumption—of fixity, of consistency, of identity—is ultimately quite dangerous. Attempting to capture something as ambiguous as identity via a literary medium is truly an exercise in frustration, for as words are committed to paper, and therefore rendered static, identity has consistently proven dynamic. Authors continually attempt to pin down the moment, to speak a word for the present; hence, as history unfolds and we continue to evolve as a species, works change over time—not only in the styles employed in their composition but also in the manner by which we approach them. That is, while a text’s words may never change, we do, and hence the interaction between text and reader is, like our identities, ever-evolving. Tomorrow, a breakthrough development in space exploration or biomedicine may change how we interpret a novel finished yesterday, thereby altering our estimation of just who we are and what our place or our role—our identity—is. Thus, as long as works of literature and humankind coexist, they will continu-
ally seek new ways to define themselves—and each other. See also Alvarez, Julia: How the García Girls Lost Their Accents; Angelou, Maya: I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings; Aristophanes: Frogs, The; Bellow, Saul: Adventures of Augie March, The; Bradford, William: Of Plymouth Plantation; Cisneros, Sandra: House on Mango Street, The; DuBois, W. E. B.: Souls of Black Folk, The; Eliot, T. S.: “Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, The”; Ellison, Ralph: Invisible Man; Equiano, Olaudah: Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano; Erdrich, Louise: Bingo Palace, The; Grass Günter: Tin Drum, The; Ibsen, Henrik: Doll ’s House, The; Kesey, Ken: One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest; Kincaid, Jamaica: Annie John; Kingston, Maxine Hong: Tripmaster Monkey: His Fake Book; Kozinski, Jerzy: Painted Bird, The; Kundera, Milan: Unbearable Lightness of Being, The; Lessing, Doris: Golden Notebook, The; London, Jack: Call of the Wild, The; White Fang; Mistry, Rohinton: Fine Balance, A; Momaday, N. Scott: House Made of Dawn; Way to Rainy Mountain, The; Morrison, Toni: Bluest Eye, The; Pirandello, Luigi: Six Characters in Search of an Author; Poe, Edgar Allan: “Fall of the House of Usher, The”; Potok, Chaim: Chosen, The; Roth, Philip: American Pastoral; Rowlandson, Mary: Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson; Rushdie, Salman: Midnight ’s Children; Shakespeare, William: King Lear; Stevenson, Robert Louis: Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, The, and Treasure Island; Wiesel, Elie: Night; Wilde, Oscar: Picture of Dorian Gray, The. David Visser
illness
In her well-known 1978 book Illness as Metaphor, Susan Sontag says, “Everyone who is born holds dual citizenship, in the kingdom of the well and in the kingdom of the sick. Although we all prefer to use only the good passport, sooner or later each of us is obliged, at least for a spell, to identify ourselves as citizens of that other place” (3). Illness affects all human beings in some way, whether it is a simple
56â•…â•… illness bout of the flu, a chronic painful condition, a disability, or a life-threatening disease. Because all readers, even if we have not ourselves been severely ill, can relate to the idea of Sontag’s two kingdoms, illness is a frequent and powerful theme in literature. When we are sick, we have a feeling of not being part of the mainstream; we can concentrate only on the sickness, the pain, and the discomfort, and in doing so, we remove ourselves from life for a while. The sick, then, are deviant; they are not normal. Literature has a history of using illness to highlight deviations from what is normal, both positive deviations and negative ones. Sociologists and medical professionals have several different ways of explaining why illness has such a powerful hold over our imaginations. Echoing Sontag’s metaphor, the physician Michael Stein says in The Lonely Patient that illness is a kind of travel into a “foreign kingdom” or an “unrecognized neighborhood” (10). The sick person is confused and anxious, asking many unanswerable questions about how to act, what to say, and how long the stay in this “foreign kingdom” will be. Illness, then, can symbolize a journey, albeit a frightening, disorienting one. The writer and physician Oliver Sacks notes that the word we use to describe that journey—sickening—has no counterpart: There is no “healthening.” We usually use the word recovery, which indicates we are retrieving our lost health from somewhere, but it is the “sickening” that provides the powerful metaphor (quoted in Stein 96). This metaphor is so powerful, claims David B. Morris in Illness and Culture in the Postmodern Age, that “almost every era seems marked by a distinctive illness that defines or deeply influences it” (50). In the Middle Ages, the bubonic plague changed the face of Europe, killing millions of people, approximately one fourth of the population. Not only did millions die, but millions more lived in constant fear of contracting the dreaded plague. In the Renaissance, what was known at the time as “melancholy,” but what today we would call depression, pervaded. In the late 17th and 18th centuries, sometimes referred to as the Enlightenment, gout, a kind of arthritis, and syphilis, a deadly venereal disease, held sway. Doctors attributed both of these diseases to the loosening morals of the upper classes, as gout
was mostly diagnosed among the wealthier citizens who could afford treatment, and syphilis was the product both of aristocratic promiscuity and the urban poverty of the prostitutes they frequented. In the 19th century, tuberculosis was the dominant illness. With its victims weak, pale, and bedridden, the disease seemed to indicate that the suffering it brought purified those whom it struck, or at least returned them to a natural state. Many artists and writers of the 19th century died from tuberculosis, including the writers John Keats, Emily Brontë, and Robert Louis Stevenson and the composer Frédéric Chopin, leading to the assumption that those of artistic temperament were especially susceptible. In the 20th century, cancer took over as the defining illness. Cancer is a brutal, seemingly indestructible enemy that can attack out of nowhere and that often must be fought by further brutalizing the body with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. It dehumanizes the patient. As such, it is an appropriate metaphor for the 20th century and the rise of technology. Many authors have harnessed the power of illness—its anxiety, its dread, its ability to drive people apart and to bring them closer together—to tell their stories. In Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women, for instance, Beth, the sweetest of the March sisters, contracts scarlet fever while nursing a poor family. Although she recovers, she lives life in a weakened state and eventually succumbs. Her death reminds the March sisters, especially Jo and Amy, of the importance of family unity despite disagreement. In Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol, Dickens uses the sickly, disabled figure of Tiny Tim to illuminate the joy of Christmas. If this poor creature can be happy, Dickens seems to say, then so should we all be. A 20th-century take on illness can be found in Don DeLillo’s White Noise. Jack and his family have come simultaneously to fear illness and to see it as inevitable. They take pills for reasons they do not understand and receive vague diagnoses that only serve to frighten them. In addition to serving as a useful vehicle around which to tell a powerful tale, illness has also functioned as a more specific metaphor. For example, illness can also represent failure. The noted American sociologist Talcott Parsons has described health as
illnessâ•…â•… 57 a “gatekeeper” to success. A healthy body and mind is the basic condition, he says, for functioning in a democracy and “too low a general level of health is dysfunctional” (quoted in Gerhardt 7). When illness stands as a metaphor for failure, it symbolizes deviancy. The sick person has failed to keep well, failed to keep personal commitments, and failed to adequately garner support and admiration from others (Gerhardt 22). The ill in this scenario are necessarily passive, helpless, and detached from reality. Therefore, they lack the characteristics to succeed in the modern world. In Eugene O’Neill’s play Long Day’s Journey into Night, half of the Tyrone family suffers from chronic illness. At the play’s start, Edmund has just learned he suffers from tuberculosis. His many attempts to find his place in the world have failed and now, O’Neill seems to be suggesting, he will find his true calling in death. His mother, Mary, suffers from a debilitating morphine addiction; she has failed to face the problems in her real life, so she uses morphine to dull the emotional pain this gives her. The morphine, in effect, paralyzes her, highlighting the metaphorical paralysis in which the whole family is trapped. While the idea that illness represents a kind of failure is common in discussions of physical illness, in discussions of mental illness it is practically normative. Mental illness, as the literary historian Shoshana Felman has theorized, is like a kind of blindness, a literally inability to see what is actually happening. As such, those who are mentally ill are often shunned because they are incapable of acting in a way we consider reasonable. In Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar, the protagonist, Esther Greenwood, loses her ability to function in the real world as the novel progresses. She cannot “see” who she really is—a young woman with talent and intelligence. She feels trapped, not only by her skewed view of the world but also by the assumptions of those around her that she could just “decide” to be all right. That those who, like Esther, are sick because they want to be or because they deserve it is another common portrayal of illness in literature. Disease has long been seen as a form of divine punishment—a curse well deserved by those who have fallen sick. Susan Sontag explains that the ancient Greeks believed illness sprung from super-
natural punishment or demonic possession and that the accursed must have done something to warrant this affliction. Early Christians, she writes, had more moralized notions of disease. Disease was still viewed as a divine punishment, but now the specific disease was thought to express the deviant character of the patient. This view of disease can be seen well into the 20th century. Tuberculosis, for instance, was long believed to result from too much passion, while cancer was thought to result from the suppression of passion (Sontag 21). AIDS, with its most common methods of transmission involving behavior considered deviant by most (homosexual intercourse, the use of intravenous drugs), has been referred to as a “punishment from God” by ignorant, fearful critics. In Tony Kushner’s Angels in America, Roy Cohn, the closeted homosexual lawyer diagnosed with AIDS, certainly feels this way. He is ashamed of his disease and does everything he can to hide it. Prior Walter, on the other hand, also diagnosed with AIDS, gains confidence as he embraces his past and his present, being visited by an angel and dead relatives and being declared a prophet. In the end, perhaps Cohn is being punished—not for being gay, but for hiding his true identity. Although there are many different methods by which authors deal with illness in their texts, it is such an important, unavoidable part of real life that it always serves as a powerful device. Depictions of illness can carry hope, despair, and grief; they can illuminate difference and similarity; and they can most powerfully display the experience of being human. See also Capote, Truman: In Cold Blood; Cather, Willa: O Pioneers!; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: House of the Seven Gables, The; Ibsen, Henrik: Doll ’s House, A; Lessing, Doris: Golden Notebook, The; Poe, Edgar Allan: “Fall of the House of Usher, The”; “Tell-Tale Heart, The”; Fitzgerald, F. Scott: Tender Is the Night; Gilman, Charlotte Perkins: Yellow Wallpaper, The; Rhys, Jean: Wide Sargasso Sea; Silko, Leslie Marmon: Ceremony; Sinclair, Upton: Jungle, The; Turgenev, Ivan: Fathers and Sons; Steinbeck, John: Of Mice and Men. FURTHER READING Felman, Shoshana. Writing and Madness (Literature/ Philosophy/Psychoanalysis). Translated by Martha
58â•…â•… individual and society Noel Evans and the author with the assistance of Brian Massumi. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1985. Gerhardt, Uta. Ideas about Illness: An Intellectual and Political History of Medical Sociology. New York: New York University Press, 1989. Morris, David B. Illness and Culture in the Postmodern Age. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. Sontag, Susan. Illness as Metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1978. Stein, Michael. The Lonely Patient: How We Experience Illness. New York: William Morrow, 2007.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
individual and society
Human beings have always tried to come together in groups, not only to live in a way that ensures an escape from pangs of solitude but also to attain a collective strength against a common enemy, be it animals, other humans, or the wrath of nature. Even so, the relationship between the individual and society has always been simultaneously rewarding and conflicting. An endless debate exists over whether an individual—the basic unit of the society—should be able to claim greater attention to his personal rights and privileges, or the society—the alliance of individuals strengthened by their mutual consent— should be empowered to overlook one for many. The tension inherent in such a puzzling relationship becomes apparent from the subtle contradiction in defining each. The Concise Oxford Dictionary (8th edition) defines an individual as a “single human being as distinct from a family or group,” whereas a society is the “sum of human conditions and activity regarded as a whole functioning interdependently” (emphases mine), and this “distinctness” of an individual struggles against the societal stipulation for a merging “interdependence.” The brightest minds have long endeavored to solve this conundrum. Every age has generated theories with clashing conclusions on this subject. The Greek philosopher Plato argued that an individual, not being self-sufficient, cannot live alone. Aristotle more considerately highlighted not just man’s “need of ” but also his “desire for” society. Nevertheless, for both the society was more important than the individual. The Stoics envisaged a brotherhood of
mankind; the Epicureans instead openly avowed an individual’s conscious self-interest, which was strikingly individualistic for its time. The Roman statesman Cicero rejected Epicureanism in favor of the Aristotelean view. The Middle Ages, under the banner of Christianity, revived the idea of a universal brotherhood and emphasized the society’s being a “natural product” since it arises out of an individual’s “natural” sociability. Even during the transition from the medieval to early modern times, society was prioritized over the individual. The early modern era promoted the social contract theory. The 17th-century English philosopher Thomas Hobbes, believing the pre-social man to have been antisocial, averred that mutual fear produced society. For John Locke, who dismissed this theory, man merely executed the laws of nature in a pre-political rather than a pre-social situation. To the French philosopher Montesquieu, societal structure depended on a proper balance between such factors as climate, religion and customs. The 18thcentury philosopher David Hume and Jean-Jacques Rousseau blamed property and social classes for creating inequality among individuals in a society. Immanuel Kant and George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, opposing the egotism of contemporary German romanticism, discouraged “pure” individuality. After the advent of the Industrial Revolution, the French philosopher Claude-Henri de Rouvroy Saint-Simon thought that the “industrial society” of the 19th century was “healthier” since it created partners, not subjects. Karl Marx, in contrast, famously prophesied the bourgeoisie’s downfall due to modern industry and the consequent rise of a classless society. Utilitarianism advocated “greater good for a greater number.” Yet individual rights had already started gaining priority over those of a group, and the term individualism was also coined. Moreover, with the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche declaring the death of God, all binding factors that had kept social obligations alive so far seemed to crumble, and individuals were suddenly left with a dangerous kind of freedom encumbered with a responsibility for every decision taken. With the two devastating world wars of the 20th century, no wonder older traditions lost their worth for the trauma-ridden individual. Such despair of
individual and societyâ•…â•… 59 “isolation amid crowds” understandably gave rise to Jean-Paul Sartre’s existentialism and Albert Camus’s sense of the absurd. All age-old conflicting theories finally seem to endorse a paradox: An individual is both “the creature and the creator of society” (Hawthorn 27). The individual, the French sociologist Émile Durkheim declared in the latter part of the 19th century, is defined by his social relations. By playing his “social role,” he metamorphoses from an individual into a person (persona is a Latin word for the ancient theatrical mask). Since this “person” is a social being, his every act is invariably a social (because human) act. So is his literary venture. He writes in a language which, the 20th-century British sociologist Anthony Giddens would argue, he did not even create. Even in satirizing society, he may distance himself from the society he criticizes, but that again underscores the inseverable link between himself and his society. An individual can never be completely divorced from society. The society allocates roles for each individual and prescribes rules for each role. The violation of “formal” rules is punished by judiciary and police; that of the “informal” ones by shame and ostracism. Meursault, in Camus’s The Stranger, is condemned when he refuses to conform to the unwritten norm of showing grief at his mother’s death; his society is unwilling to condone a murder committed due to the glare of the sun. For his former offense, he reaps societal suspicion and dislike; for his latter crime, he gets capital punishment. In Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov’s punishment for murder is more personal than judicial. The judiciary comes to know of it only when he confesses of his own accord, and that very confession is the outcome of a thorough internalization of his society’s morality. Conditioned by social expectations, Beowulf (Anonymous), as the hero of his people, must show extraordinary courage. Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre, for all her radical thoughts of emancipation, may still be redeemed by her ultimately not flouting the social dictates of feminine tenderness, faithful love, and Christian kindness. But in Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, the title character’s violation of norms in the form of an extramarital
affair cannot be exonerated by her conservative society. Her husband forgives her, yet she must still die in the end to maintain the societal status quo. A society inevitably dooms an individual to a divided self. Various social positions and phases demand various social roles to be played. To do so, the anthropologist Margaret Mead argued, I (the real self ) must give in to Me (the social self )—willingly or otherwise. The uncoordinated instincts of the id (the dark, unconscious part of human psyche), to use Freudian terms, must be reined in by the rationality of the ego (the polished part modified by external influences) and the moralizing function of the superego (the critical conscientious part). A fantastical allegorical representation of this dichotomy of self is seen in Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, where Dr. Jekyll is the “social” face of the named individual and Mr. Hyde is the “real,” untailored part of him that defies social conventions and performs deadly acts contrary to a doctor’s healing duties. The healer by day horrifyingly transforms into the killer by night, symbolizing the hideous image of an individual when uncontrolled by society’s leashes. “Without a social environment no self can arise” (Aubert 58) because self-analysis is possible only by considering others’ perception of it. Hence, extended isolation may “threaten to disturb or destroy the perceptions of the self ” (58). Though Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe is portrayed as the sole shipwreck survivor, rebuilding his world on a remote island with the morals and customs of his civilization indelibly etched in his nature, William Golding takes a more skeptical approach. His Lord of the Flies instead subverts Defoe’s world to illustrate how something goes very wrong with human “culture” when segregated from the civilizing influences of society by showing a swift degradation of morals in a band of boys left stranded on a deserted island. Not just total isolation but confrontation with other cultures may also challenge the stability of one’s own cultural values. In the absence of the restraining measures of his compatriots, Kurtz, in Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, “goes native.” Chinua Achebe, on the other hand, depicts the doomed struggle of an individual, Okonkwo, to hold together his dilapidating traditional society
60â•…â•… innocence and experience against the superior power of the white man in Things Fall Apart. Nonetheless, society is not an unmixed blessing. Pip, in Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations, loses his essential innocence and goodness in the urge to rise in an ambitious and mercenary society; while A Tale of Two Cities shows a Sidney Carton distraught with disappointments, although his innate capacity to love cannot be killed even amid the bloodthirsty fury of Paris in the grip of the French Revolution. George Eliot’s Silas Marner suffers wrongly in the hands of his fellow beings and becomes an embittered recluse but is later rescued from the unenviable fate of a misanthrope by the love of a castaway child. That man cannot live alone is depicted, consciously or unconsciously, even in texts where this theme is least expected. It is an utter lack of communication with his family and society who have forsaken him, terrified at his vermin form, that eventually kills Gregor Samsa in Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis. Estragon and Vladimir, in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot, decide not to even playfully attempt suicide to pass their time because if one dies accidentally, the other will be left alone. So, even amid existentialist angst and in an absurdist limbo, an individual’s minimal necessity for company cannot be disregarded. A society is a “natural” product, and an individual, in turn, is a “social” one. See also Anderson, Sherwood: Winesburg, Ohio; Bradbury, Ray: Fahrenheit 451; Bunyan, John: Pilgrim’s P rogress, The; Byron, George Gordon Byron, Lord: Don Juan; Dickens, Charles: Christmas Carol, A; Emerson, Ralph Waldo: “American Scholar, The”; “Self-Reliance”; Faulkner, William: Light in August; Gay, John: Beggar’s Opera, The; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: Scarlet Letter, The; “Young Goodman Brown”; Hesse, Herman: Siddhartha; Huxley, Aldous: Brave New World; Irving, Washington: Sketchbook of Geoffrey Crayon, The; Jackson, Shirley: “Lottery, The”; Kerouac, Jack: On the Road; Kipling, Rudyard: Kim; Kozinski, Jerzy: Painted Bird, The; Lewis, Sinclair: Main Street; Melville, Herman: Billy Budd, Sailor; Molière: Misanthrope, The; Naipaul, V. S.: House for Mr. Biswas, A;
Orwell, George: Nineteen Eighty-Four; Poe, Edgar Allan: “Murders in the Rue Morgue, The”; Rand, Ayn: Anthem; Shakespeare, William: Romeo and Juliet; Taming of the Shrew, The; Solzhenitsyn, Alexander: One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich; Sophocles: Antigone; Swift, Jonathan: Gulliver’s Travels; Thoreau, Henry David: “Resistance to Civil Government”; Walden; Vonnegut, Kurt: Cat ’s Cradle; Wharton, Edith: Ethan Frome; House of Mirth; Winterson, Jeanette: Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit. FURTHER READING Aubert, Vilhelm. Elements of Sociology. London: Heinemann, 1968. Hawthorn, Geoffrey. Enlightenment and Despair: A History of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
Susmita Roye
innocence and experience
Perhaps because literature so often focuses on human experience, it frequently covers the themes of innocence and experience. Just as there are many stories, so too are there many forms of both innocence and experience. For many centuries, innocence and experience were interpreted primarily in terms of religion, with innocence denoting a state free from sin. As European civilization became increasingly secularized, however, these terms took on more general usage wherein innocence came to denote roughly a state of naïveté or simplicity without necessarily implying religious overtones (though these had not vanished). One of the most frequently depicted changes, and one that became a touchstone of romanticism, is that from the optimism of childhood to the realities of adulthood. William Blake’s popular set of poems Songs of Innocence and of Experience (1794) helps to illuminate the interdependence and relative value of both terms. At first, childhood may seem like a time of innocence and freedom from the responsibilities of maturity, whereas adulthood is a time when experience, education, and exposure to the world taint one’s sense of innocence. Even in this straightforward account, the two terms are interdependent, as a
innocence and experienceâ•…â•… 61 time of innocence can only be recognized retrospectively, from the vantage point of experience. Blake takes this tension between the two terms to new heights in his poems, however, demonstrating that people are capable of either state at various times in their lives. Furthermore, either state might take the form of the other. For example, in “The Chimney Sweeper” from Songs of Innocence, the young chimney sweep Tom Dacre has a dream wherein he and his friends are freed from their coffins by an angel, who leads them to play happily in the clouds. On the one hand, the dream epitomizes innocence in that it takes the form of a fantasy in which Tom gets to escape from work to play with his friends. This thought, that he would be rewarded at the end of his life, keeps him going: “Tho’ the morning was cold, Tom was happy & warm / So if all do their duty they need not fear harm” (ll. 23–24). On the other hand, this vision of innocence seems to simultaneously convey a darker point from the side of experience. In one sense, Tom’s vision suggests that the only way for these children to be released from their horrible working conditions is through death. Inverting the closing line, it is precisely by doing their duty (cleaning chimneys) that they need to fear harm (black lung, cancer, accident). This final line turns out to be ambiguous indeed, because it could equally serve as a kind of threat to the people who mistreat the children: If they do their duty to the children, then they need not fear harm. The companion poem (also named “The Chimney Sweeper”) from Songs of Experience reinforces this point. The speaker of this poem fully recognizes what might only be hinted at in the other. Of his parents, who put him to work, he says, “They think they have done me no injury: / And are gone to praise God & his Priest & King / Who make up a heaven of our misery” (ll. 10–12). These lines serve as a great example of how Blake’s poems complicate the narrative of growth, because here it is the adults who are innocent and naive whereas the child is burdened by the harsh realities of his experience. In another sense, however, the adults could be to blame for purposely trying to minimize their responsibility by inventing the idea of heaven to justify their exploitation of children. In other words, adults fully realize how horrible their actions are but seek to
cover up their knowledge with narratives of earthly suffering and heavenly reward. Like poetry, fiction often deals with issues of innocence and experience. In fact, one of the major genres of the novel, the bildungsroman, tells the story of a character’s education and growth. While these stories ostensibly focus on a single protagonist, the growth of the individual is often linked to and helps to illuminate larger societal changes or conflicts. In this sense, the bildungsroman often tells the story of a particular character in a way that also ties into the development of his or her community. Both Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness (1902) and James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as A Young Man (1916) are examples of the genre, although Portrait resists the kind of closure typical of the genre. One novel that resonates on both personal and societal levels in terms of the relationship between innocence and experience is Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. The story is initially narrated by a sailor who listens to the mysterious Marlow, who in turn recounts his experiences piloting a steamboat up the Congo River. Marlow begins as an idealistic youth, looking to a life at sea as a chance to explore new lands or, as he phrases it, the blank spaces on maps. Taking a job with a Dutch trading company, Marlow heads to Africa with high hopes. Through a series of events in which he witnesses firsthand the cruel and senseless behavior of the Europeans, culminating in his meeting with Kurtz, Marlow is forced to question many of the traditional narratives he started out with, including that of the moral and spiritual superiority of Europeans compared to the native African peoples. Marlow’s physical journey up the Congo, into the heart of Africa, can be said to correspond with his spiritual journey, in which he investigates the “heart” of humanity. Kurtz’s dying words, “the horror,” coupled with his barbaric behavior (note, for example, the skulls on the fence around his house) suggest that there are terrible passions in each of us waiting to be released. Marlow’s encounter with Kurtz is immensely disappointing in that Marlow had heard nothing but fantastic tales about how intelligent, cultivated, and efficient Kurtz was. Kurtz turns out to be a disappointing hero to say the least. In a much broader
62â•…â•… isolation sense, however, Marlow’s transition into experience can be seen to represent the larger experience of European colonialism. As he points out to his listeners, “The conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much” (7). Marlow’s personal disillusionment signals a growing awareness of the violence and cruelty that underpinned the supposedly beneficial process of colonization. James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man tells the story of the growth and development of Stephen Dedalus. Like Marlow, Stephen slowly gains knowledge about the effects of imperialism, though in his case he does so as a member of the colonized people. Portrait presents a more complex picture of the interrelationship of innocence and experience, as Stephen moves from one pole to another within each of the novel’s five sections. For example, at the end of the third section, Stephen has become convinced that he must repent his sins and dedicate his life to serve within the Catholic Church. In the next section, however, he begins to implement this plan only to abandon it in favor of his calling to become an artist. Each section presents a crisis that Stephen responds to by adopting a new goal, which is then replaced in the face of the next crisis or problem that he faces. In this sense, Stephen is constantly passing through stages of innocence and experience, but each version of experience is subsequently revealed to be yet another form of innocence. Accompanying each new goal or level of experience, Stephen employs an increasingly complex vocabulary and style. For example, the simple language of the children’s tale at the beginning, “Once upon a time and a very good time it was” gives way, in the final section, to Stephen’s elaborate arguments about aesthetics. In keeping with the restless mental development of its protagonist, Portrait is difficult to read as a straightforward national allegory for Ireland. While Stephen recognizes the power structures behind the use of the English language, for example, he also flatly rejects the calls of nationalism in favor of a European cosmopolitanism in the form of his pending trip to Paris. Stephen’s dedication to further his education and to escape
from the confines of his country demonstrates a commitment to continue the process of discovery that is at the heart of literature. Precisely by reading and thinking about literature, we are able to evaluate our own sense of experience and, hopefully, to enrich it as well. See also Adams, Henry: Education of Henry Adams, The; Austen, Jane: Sense and Sensibility; Carroll, Lewis: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland; Cisneros, Sandra: House on Mango Street, The; Defoe, Daniel: Moll Flanders; Dreiser, Theodore: Sister Carrie; Forster, E. M.: Room with a View, A; Harte, Bret: “Outcasts of Poker Flats, The”; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: “Young Goodman Brown”; James, Henry: Portrait of a Lady, The; Turn of the Screw, The; Kincaid, Jamaica: Annie John; Nabokov, Vladimir: Lolita; O’Brien, Tim: Things They Carried, The; Poe, Edgar Allan: “Murders in the Rue Morgue, The”; Salinger, J. D.: Catcher in the Rye, The; Twain, Mark: Adventures of Tom Sawyer, The; Voltaire: Candide; Wharton, Edith: House of Mirth, The; Wiesel, Elie: Night; Wilde, Oscar: Importance of Being Earnest, The; Picture of Dorian Gray, The. FURTHER READING Brivic, Sheldon. Joyce between Freud and Jung. Port Washington: Kennikat Press, 1980. Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness. New York: Norton: 1988.
Daniel Ryan Morse
isolation
Isolation is a powerful force. Human beings live, work, and play in groups, and to be separate from the whole of humanity can disorient us, debilitate us, and even make us question our place in the world. Isolation is easily confused with other forms of aloneness such as loneliness and alienation, but the condition of being isolated requires that one be detached from others through reasons not in one’s control. Isolation produces devastating consequences for many people, leading to lifelong emotional problems and difficulty in relationships with others. Conversely, the condition can move
isolationâ•…â•… 63 others toward extraordinary creativity and innovation as a result of having been forced to rely solely on their own minds as a source for meaning. As one might suspect, these two sides of the coin are not mutually exclusive; many people experience both positive and negative effects of isolation, deriving inspiration from it while at the same time feeling hurt and disturbed. Obviously, not all who feel isolated are literally alone, and not all who are alone are isolated. In an essay on isolation in literature, Mark Conliff points out that the condition hinges on the individual having once been part of a whole. The isolated person is not really a “stranger” or an “outsider,” words that might come to mind when thinking of this solitary state. Isolation requires that one was part of the group (at least at one time) and that he or she continues “to be defined, however subtly, by his association with his usual world” (121). That identification is what makes isolation so powerful. The stranger might long to be part of the group but, having never been a member, will not derive meaning or shape her identity based on this association. The isolated soul, however, cannot escape the connection. Whether the isolation is voluntarily imposed on the self or forced by some other entity, it is a condition that is objective in that it is not merely a feeling, and that is created by an outside force, not by happenstance. When human beings are genuinely isolated from others, serious psychological consequences may result. This is due to the basic human need to belong, to depend on and be accompanied by others throughout life. When human beings lived in hunter-gatherer societies, survival required these affiliations. As humans have evolved from that period in their history, they have not lost that need. The English psychiatrist Anthony Storr noted that these connections need not be intimate ones, but that they must be there: “[W]hether or not they are enjoying intimate relationships, human beings need a sense of being part of a larger community than that constituted by the family” (13). Kipling D. Williams, in his study of ostracism and its effects, notes that the need to belong is fundamental, and that “an absence of affiliation .╯.╯. with others produces a host of negative psychological consequences, including depression, anxiety, stress, and physical and mental
illness” (60). Being isolated from others, Williams goes on to argue, can also effect other fundamental needs, such as the need for self-esteem, the need to feel in control of one’s own life, and the need for meaningful existence (59–60). Being apart from others in any kind of systematic way can, in fact, alter the way we derive meaning from our lives. Isolation, forced or voluntary, can be as a window into what life would be like if we did not exist. When there is no one to take notice of us, no one to see us, talk to us, or respond to us in any way, it is as though we are dead, for there is no one there to remind us that we are alive. William James, in his groundbreaking Principles of Psychology (1890) says, “No more fiendish punishment could be devised, were such a thing physically possible, than that one should be turned loose in society and remain absolutely unnoticed by all the members thereof ” (quoted in Williams 2). To be cut off like this, or “cut dead” as James puts it, is one of the most powerful weapons humans wield against one another and the basis for one of our society’s most common punitive actions: incarceration. When isolation is forced, as in incarceration or ostracism, its victims can undergo enormous pain and stress. For example, in Susan Glaspell’s play Trifles, Minnie Wright has been isolated by her cruel husband for many years. She sees no one, talks to no one, and must live out her days in only his infrequent and reticent company. Thus, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters surmise that when John Wright kills her only source of comfort, and indeed her only source of identification, her parakeet, she snaps and turns to murder, a completely uncharacteristic move. This parakeet is the only way Minnie knows she is alive, because it responds to her by singing, which she herself used to do in church with other members of her community. Minnie’s isolation is created by her husband; many characters in literature suffer forced isolation at the hands of family members. In The Color Purple, by Alice Walker, Celie is isolated first by her father and then by her husband, Mister. She is given no access to those who love her and those who would give her life intimacy and connection. First her father takes away her babies moments after they are born, then he marries her off to Mister, separat-
64â•…â•… isolation ing her from her beloved sister, Nettie. After Celie goes to live at Mister’s house, he in turn isolates her, keeping her like a prisoner, forced to cook, clean, and have sex, but receiving no comfort or love from anyone. Briefly, when Nettie lives with them, Celie feels joy again, but Mister literally tears them apart from one another and forces Nettie out of the house. Significantly, Mister tries to keep Nettie from teaching Celie how to read—and once she is gone, he hides the letters Nettie sends. These letters, had they been delivered, would have given Celie the human connection she so desperately needed. Her isolation cultivates in her feelings of worthlessness—feelings that leave her to wonder if she is even human. Forced isolation such as Celie and Minnie experience may also be brought on by society or by the circumstances of one’s life. In William Shakespeare’s The Tempest, Ariel and Caliban have been isolated for years, alone on an island, until a shipwreck brings others into their lives. Both of them react based on their previous isolation. Ariel, who has been imprisoned in a tree, is willing to do Prospero’s bidding because he is grateful to have the company of others once again. Caliban, on the other hand, is horrified to have to share “his” island. His years alone have made him rough and unable to communicate well—and thus he appears to the shipwreck survivors as a beast, unfit for human interaction. While isolation often produces effects that dehumanize people, positive changes may also result from extended solitude. As Anthony Storr argues, “The capacity to be alone is a valuable resource when changes of mental attitude are required” (29). He relates stories of such isolated souls as the children’s author Beatrix Potter and the 17th-century explorer and nobleman Sir Walter Raleigh. Schooled at home by a nanny, Potter was isolated as a child, with no opportunity to mix with other children. She made “friends” with the animals she encountered—rabbits, mice, ducks—and spent hours drawing them. As an adult, she would go on to produce the famous and beautifully illustrated Peter Rabbit stories. Storr theorizes that the isolation she experienced as a child forced her to create companions, and that is what led to her ultimate creativity (111–112). Raleigh wrote the first volume of his Historie of the World, about ancient Greece and Rome, while
imprisoned in the Tower of London. Again, Storr theorizes that like Potter, Raleigh devised something for his mind to do while his body was physically isolated. In Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s short story The Yellow Wallpaper, the narrator is confined to her room for what her husband and her doctors have declared a “nervous” depression. With nothing else to do, she becomes obsessed with the room’s wallpaper, eventually believing she is one of the women on the wallpaper. In the end, the narrator does reach psychosis—but one can read this ending as a kind of freedom from her husband’s control. Her isolation forces her to think in a new way, and ultimately he frees her from the room because of this. Isolation, while mostly a difficult, debilitating force for human beings, can also produce interesting, creative results in its victims. By and large, however, being isolated challenges our basic human needs and calls into question the meaning of our lives. Literature, with its windows into the thoughts and feelings of the characters it portrays, allows us a glimpse into the isolated mind. See also Bierce, Ambrose: “Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge, An”; Chopin, Kate: Awakening, The; Conrad, Joseph: Heart of Darkness; Defoe, Daniel: Robinson Crusoe; Frost, Robert: poems; Harte, Bret: “Luck of Roaring Camp, The”; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: “Rappaccini’s Daughter”; Hemingway, Ernest: Old Man and the Sea, The; Hurston, Zora Neale: Their Eyes Were Watching God; James, Henry: Turn of the Screw, The; Joyce, James: Dubliners; Molière: Misanthrope, The; Morrison, Toni: Bluest Eye, The; Salinger, J. D.: Catcher in the Rye, The; Steinbeck, John: Of Mice and Men; Twain, Mark: Adventures of Huckleberry Finn; Wharton, Edith: Frome, Ethan; Williams, Tennessee: Streetcar Named Desire, A. FURTHER READING Conliffe, Mark. “On Isolation.” Midwest Quarterly 47, no. 2 (Winter 2006): 115–130. Storr, Anthony. Solitude. New York: Free Press (1988). Williams, Kipling D. Ostracism. New York: Guilford, 2001.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
justiceâ•…â•… 65
justice
The desire to be treated fairly, and to see others treated fairly, is a fundamental human impulse. We seek justice in our own lives, and many of us promote it in the lives of others. Injustice strikes us as unnatural, an imbalance that should not be tolerated in moral, humane societies. Some would even argue that justice is the most important factor in making a moral society, saying that without justice, there can be no true moral authority. Philosophers do not agree, however, on virtually any aspect of justice. There are controversies involving whether or not actions can be considered just, what intellectual paths we must take to make those determinations, how justice should be carried out, and whether or not there can be such a thing as “natural” justice— that is, universal principles that all societies should follow. Justice is a complicated subject because what is “right” may not always be what is “just,” and what is “just” may not always be “right.” For instance, a culture that follows the Old Testament precept of “an eye for an eye” might call killing an innocent person to avenge the death of another innocent person “just.” Few of us, however, would call that the right course of action. Conversely, the institution of slavery might help a local economy function well, leading some to label it “good,” but it would be impossible to argue that slavery is ever “just.” Literature explores the complexities surrounding the concept of justice often. For instance, when the lion Aslan agrees to be sacrificed in place of the traitor Edmund in C. S. Lewis’s The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, he is conforming to the laws of Narnia, laws whose stated role is to deliver justice. Edmund, after all, did commit treason, and treason should be punished. For Edmund to die at the hands of the White Witch might be justice, but Aslan knows it would spell disaster for the future of Narnia, so he dies in Edmund’s place. Conversely, the women of Susan Glaspell’s play Trifles subvert justice, becoming criminals themselves in the process when they hide evidence that might convict Minnie Wright. What they do may not be just, but Glaspell definitely wants us to believe that what they do is right.
This question of what is “just” and what is “right” is one of the questions philosophers grapple with when they discuss justice. Serious explorations of the problem must examine first whether or not we can ever rationally justify these terms, which seem so very subjective. If we can justify them, then we are left asking the equally difficult questions of “How ought we to act in order to be just?” and “How ought social institutions be structured so as to achieve justice?” (Buchanan and Mathieu 12). Some theories of justice are retributive—that is, they are concerned with using punishment to restore the imbalance created by the injustice of crime. This type of justice is almost exclusively associated with criminal justice. When it is properly retributive, those who have taken “unfair advantage of the law abiding populace” are punished in proportion to their crime (12). The killers depicted in Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith, brutally murder a family of four. They performed this deed, as Capote notes through his title, “in cold blood.” What this phrase indicates is that there were no mitigating circumstances to explain why they committed this crime. In William Shakespeare’s Othello, the title character kills his wife, Desdemona, because he believes she has been unfaithful; it is a crime of passion that he commits in a fit of rage. But Hickock and Smith kill the Clutter family calmly and without remorse. When society seeks justice for this offense, then, it seeks the highest penalty. Because Hickock and Smith took lives so coldly, they must pay with their own. This is retributive justice. While we may not always agree on just how to make all punishments fit their crimes, the concept itself is relatively simple. Distributive justice, on the other hand, is a much more complicated concept. Theories of justice that are distributive seek to regulate social and economic inequalities. The distribution of goods in a society can never be perfectly equal: Some will always have more than others, due to differences in intelligence, skill, personality, or sheer luck. Distributive justice asks us to determine how this inevitable imbalance might be most fairly corrected. One of the foundational principles of distributive justice, sometimes called the “formal principle” and usually attributed to the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, is that
66â•…â•… justice “equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally—but in proportion to their relevant similarities and differences” (Buchanan and Mathieu 15). Applying that principle to real-life situations is complicated. Most philosophers of justice agree that we must focus on certain material principles in our consideration of whether or not inequality is just: need, ability, effort, productivity, public utility, and supply and demand. In other words, when we try to determine whether or not a particular state of inequality is just or unjust, we must consider the above categories. One system of distributive justice is known as utilitarianism. This system asks one question of actions and policies concerned with distribution: Does it maximize overall utility? For example, for utilitarians, “maximizing overall utility might permit or even require members of one segment of society to lead live of impoverished slaves, lacking even the most basic civil and political liberties” (26). In the system of apartheid depicted in Isak Dinesen’s Out of Africa, the black Africans live lives in just such a position. Dinesen is able to justify this situation because she sees them as childlike and unable to handle their own affairs. She truly sees this clearly unfair situation as being better for society as a whole; thus, she is adopting a utilitarian position. John Rawls, perhaps the best known philosopher of distributive justice, rejects this utilitarian mindset. His principles of justice, outlined in his 1971 book A Theory of Justice, are threefold. First, each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive system of equal basic liberties. For Rawls, these basic liberties are freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, freedom from arbitrary arrest, the right to hold personal property, and freedom of political participation. Second, offices and position are to be open to all; people with similar abilities and skills should have equal access to positions of power and importance. Third, social and economic institutions are to be arranged in ways that maximize the benefits for the worst off. Rawls’s ideas are controversial, to be sure, as adhering to his principles almost guarantees a redistribution of wealth. Another school of thought, libertarianism, would declare that any redistribution of wealth is theft.
So how can we assure ourselves that our societies are just without becoming Robin Hoods, robbing the rich to give to the poor? Or maybe Robin Hood, despite his criminal ways, was acting in the name of justice. Criminal justice, of course, would punish Robin Hood for stealing from others, but it is social justice we discuss here. The basic question is whether or not those at the top of the social heap have a moral responsibility to share with those at the bottom. Samuel Clemens, writing as Mark Twain, seems to have felt that they did. In his Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Clemens uses the story of a child, Huck, who has been forgotten by his society, to “argue for the ethical and moral treatment of children” (Kiskis 67). If it is incumbent upon us as Christians to physically and spiritually comfort the poor, how can we let a child like Huck forge his way alone? He is abused by his father, isolated by society, treated as an outcast, and finally left to fend for himself. The community sees this as Huck’s own choice, but Twain wants us to consider how we can let a child make such a choice. Twain’s Huck “reminds us of our complicity in a society that disposes of people” (71). If we accept that complicity, then we might also consider the possibility that our society should mandate reversing such injustice, and this would inevitably require some type of redistribution of wealth. We give up some rights, then, if we are willingly a part of such a society. If in order to right these wrongs, we have to give up some of our own basic liberties, or allow those liberties to be infringed upon, then perhaps that is the way we achieve justice as a society. See also Carroll, Lewis: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland; Conrad, Joseph: Lord Jim; Dante Alighieri: Divine Comedy, The; Edwards, Jonathan: “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”; Fielding, Henry: Tom Jones; Gaskell, Elizabeth: North and South; Gay, John: Beggar’s Opera, The; Gordimer, Nadine: Burger’s Daughter; Jacobs, Harriet: Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself; Kincaid, Jamaica: Small Place, A; Lawrence, Jerome, and Robert E. Lee: Inherit the Wind; Lee, Harper: To Kill a Mockingbird; McMurtry, Larry: Lonesome Dove; Molière:
loveâ•…â•… 67 Tartuffe; Paine, Thomas: Age of Reason, The; Pirandello, Luigi: Six Characters in Search of an Author; Shakespeare, William: Hamlet; Othello; Silko, Leslie Marmon: Almanac of the Dead; Sophocles: Antigone; Twain, Mark: Adventures of Tom Sawyer, The. FURTHER READING Buchanan, Allen, and Deborah Matthieu. “Philosophy and Justice.” In Justice: Views from the Social Sciences, edited by Ronald L. Cohen, 12–36. New York: Plenum Press, 1986. Kiskis, Michael J. “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (Again!): Teaching for Social Justice or Samuel Clemens’ Children’s Crusade.” Mark Twain Annual 1 (2003): 63–77. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. 1971. Reprint, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2005.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
love
There is perhaps no other theme in world literature as prevalent, provocative, diverse—and perennially compelling—as that of love or its absence. An integral part of the human experience in its various forms, love is also a key if highly complex component of what writers and critics have tried to express for their readers. Exploring different kinds and consequences of love in literary works can thus serve to define what it means as a theme within particular cultural contexts and genres as well as in our lives. But a distinction must first be made between the word love’s common usage (as in, “I loved lunch”) and its deeper, more intense and abstract meanings with which we are primarily concerned here. Among the most common kinds of love depicted in literature is that between family members. Marriage, a familiar ending of many comedic plays, tends either to be the culmination of romantic love (discussed below) or a matter of convenience, such as money and social status, often by parental, political, or economic arrangements. Jane Austen’s novels, such as Sense and Sensibility and P ride and P rejudice, are prime expositions of the theme of tensions that can arise between the two marriage motives, one love-based and the other not. Sustained lack of love in a marriage can lead to estrangement,
separation, divorce, or extramarital affairs (adultery, considered a sin in many religions), in which one spouse seeks out the love, affections, or opportunities denied by the other elsewhere, frequently tragically. The misadventures of Emma, the namesake character of Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, are a case in point. A second kind of familial love, that between parents and their children, usually differs greatly depending on the genders, personalities, and cultural circumstances of the individuals in the relationship. Motherly love is generally described as being boundless, tender, and attentive, while paternal love, in contrast, is commonly depicted as unemotional and contingent, and it often has to be earned. In the psychologist Sigmund Freud’s analysis of Sophocles’ play Oedipus the King, such stereotypes of parental love lead boys to seek out women like their mothers and rebel against their fathers (or father figures) later in life, and girls to see their mothers as competing for their father’s love; by extension, this makes all women jealous of their lovers’ attentions. Many literary works follow these basic patterns, purposefully or not. Sibling love between brothers and sisters is not only used literally by writers and critics; it can also be a metaphor for specific kinds of relations between characters unrelated by blood. The relationships between the two twin hobbits Merry and Pippin and between Frodo and Sam in J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings draw attention to the similarity between biological and nonbiological sibling love. Big Brother totalitarianism in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four is a satirical extension of brotherly love, often overly protective. Fraternal love, on the other hand, develops through bonding experiences among men of all ages, as with certain of the teenagers in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. Sisterhood is likewise not limited to the love between biological sisters but is a thematic term also applied to close and affectionate relations between women friends—as, for example, between the sisters in Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women or the sisterly bond among the women of the older generation in Amy Tan’s The Joy Luck Club. Another kind of love quite unlike familial love is that which characters and people can have for
68â•…â•… love the nonhuman, whether animals, things, or ideas. Pastoral works of poetry and fiction, for instance, celebrate the relationships between farmers and their animals or shepherds and their flocks, while other narratives focus on the love between pets and their owners, as in John Steinbeck’s The Red Pony. Some of the most cherished children’s stories, such as A. A. Milne’s Winnie-the-Pooh, use love and affection between animals to reflect on their human equivalents. Love of money, maybe more accurately described as an obsession, as well as of other tangible things—from cars and clothes to places—frequently plays pivotal thematic roles in life as in literary works. The main character in Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray is so enamored with the idea of his youth and beauty that he debauches his life in preserving them, as others have sacrificed theirs for ideas and ideals such as nation, freedom, and loyalty. Philosophy, it should be remembered, literally means a love (philo) for or friend of knowledge (sophia). As a primary thrust or secondary incidental occurrence in literature, however, it may be safe to say that no theme is as ubiquitous and variously treated as romantic love. For example, the theme of courtly love, or passion between two members of the nobility, began circulating in Europe as early as the 11th century, and by the 19th century, it was an object of ridicule in fiction in some circles. Still, certain elements within the theme of romantic love are constant and unchanging, as in its progressive stages. First comes the discovery of one lover by the other or both at once—hence the expression “lovestruck,” as when the war-injured Henry meets the nurse Catherine in Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms. The second stage is courtship, when one potential partner attempts to woo or seduce the other. Some of the best-known examples of this are contained in the large corpus of chivalric poetry, in which knights euphemistically persuade ladies to accept their overtures, ostensibly without losing their virginity or “virtue.” If the courtship is successful on both ends, then the third stage is consummation; if it is unsuccessful, then there is rejection by one or the other, or unrequited love. Thus, romantic love as an emotion must be distinguished from love
as activity, just as love as a biochemical process must be distinguished from love as thought. The thematic process of romantic love is everywhere circumscribed by the identities of its participants and the cultures in which their escapades take place. Forbidden love, sought after by participants but scorned by others or the culture, is epitomized by that between the title characters of William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet as their meeting, courtship, and tragic consummation take place against the backdrop of their feuding families. Racial, national, and class disparities between potential or actual lovers have proven to be considerable cultural obstacles that they can or cannot overcome. Pederasty, the love and mentorship of older men for younger, was commonplace in ancient Athens but would now be considered pedophilia. It is in this context that the notion of platonic love, so named after the philosopher Plato, came to be a spiritual and intellectual union rather than physical, considered base within this paradigm. Love between two people of the same sex, or homosexual love, is depicted without hesitation in the fragments of the ancient Greek poet Sappho of Lesbos, but its trials and tribulations in more contemporary times are made clear in Tony Kushner’s Angels in America. A final kind of love to be mentioned here is that which is sometimes called “universal love,” an acknowledgment of the value of all life and commitment as being unconditionally benevolent. Religious texts such as the Torah, Bible, and Quran equate this kind of supreme love to that which the Deity holds for believers and vice versa, and which enables believers to love others in the same way. It is in these senses that love is sometimes said to be blind (that is, in overlooking the faults of others) or that individuals are instruments of an independent force of love, not the other way around. But thinkers and writers such as the Russian Leo Tolstoy and the American Ralph Waldo Emerson have also described equivalents to universal love that do not require religious foundations, although they are free to have them. In an allegorical sense, then, no matter which kind of love a character or person experiences, it ultimately brings him or her closer to, or makes them more a part of, this ultimate theme of universal love.
memoryâ•…â•… 69 See also Augustine, Saint: Confessions of St. Augustine, The; Bambara, Toni Cade: Salt Eaters, The; Bradbury, Ray: Martian Chronicles, The; Brontë, Charlotte: Jane Eyre; Brontë, Emily: Wuthering Heights; Chekhov, Anton: Seagull, The; Dante Alighieri: Divine Comedy, The; Faulkner, William: Sound and the Fury, The; Fitzgerald, F. Scott: Tender Is the Night; Gay, John: Beggar’s Opera, The; Hardy, Thomas: Jude the Obscure; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: “Birth-Mark, The”; Hesse, Herman: Siddhartha; Keats, John: poems; Kundera, Milan: Unbearable Lightness of Being, The; McCullers, Carson: Heart Is a Lonely Hunter, The; Milton, John: Paradise Lost; Morrison, Toni: Tar Baby; Nabokov, Vladimir: Lolita; parenthood; Proust, Marcel: Remembrance of Things Past; Shakespeare, William: Hamlet; Othello; Tolstoy, Leo: War and Peace; Wharton, Edith: Age of Innocence, The; Yeats, William Butler: poems. FURTHER READING Fiedler, Leslie. Love and Death in the American Novel. New York: Dell, 1966. Hagestrum, Jean. Esteem Enlightened by Desire: The Couple from Homer to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. Siddall, Stephen, ed. The Truth about Love: A Collection of Writing on Love through the Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Antony Adolf
memory
Memory in literature is the written form of that which has come before. Memories come from the historical past but are also formed by social, political, and religious events in the lives of literary characters. Memory is employed in three distinct fashions, which often exist concurrently in a text: first, to establish the validity and importance of a text based on the expertise and reputation of past writers; second, as a means of instilling a feeling of nostalgia in a text; and third, and most universally, as a method of constructing individual and cultural identity. The first construction is particularly prevalent in the literature of the English Middle Ages and the
romantic movement of the 19th century, while the second has been employed throughout the 20th century by writers of both British and American origin in the wake of the sociopolitical upheavals caused by World Wars I and II. The third construction is ubiquitous in all written works dealing with individual or cultural issues, and because of this, memory serves as a literary theme of profound importance. The earliest written epic works establish memory as a central literary theme. Homer’s The Iliad and Virgil’s The Aeneid serve to establish the character and ideology of the Greek and Roman nations, respectively, through the blending of fictional elements with the recording of great men, heroic battles, and important, long-past events. It is here that the use of the catalog, or list of important historical figures, is employed not only to give the work authenticity through the presence of verifiable historical names and places, but also to convey a sense of historical memory to works that are primarily fictional in nature. Through the heroic actions of Achilles and his comrades in arms on the battlefields of the Trojan War, Homer sets down his view of the national identity and character of ancient Greece, a view that prevails today. Deliberately crafting his work on the model of Homer’s by incorporating elements both from The Iliad and The Odyssey, Virgil constructs a national history of Rome, linking Augustus himself to the ancient world and thus reinforcing his provenance to rule through the tale of Aeneas’s journey from the ruins of Troy to found Rome. Virgil, however, takes memory further in the Aeneid: Making use of the catalog and of the presence of events from Homer’s work, he expands on the theme through the instance of Aeneas’s dalliance with Dido. Sworn to travel to the location of the future Rome and establish the foundations of that great city, Aeneas finds himself delayed by an affair with the queen of Carthage; he seemingly forgets his purpose and must be reminded of his destiny by Mercury, messenger to Jupiter, the king of the gods. In this manner, Virgil adds the importance of individual memory to his text, expanding the role of memory in his writing from a collective to an individual construction. Medieval writers, steeped in the Scholastic tradition of thought, which required proof based in
70â•…â•… memory Scripture or other foundational texts of each point or idea presented within a text, probably did more than any other group to construct memory as a literary theme of supreme importance in its own right. Through compendia, or collections of writings, religious authors sought to establish validity of thought in their writings; through catalogs based on ancient Greek and Roman models, religious and secular authors alike sought to establish textual authority and to craft a memory tradition of thinking and cultural identity. Geoffrey Chaucer provides an excellent example of this in The Canterbury Tales, in which assorted travelers on pilgrimage to the shrine of Thomas à Beckett at Canterbury Cathedral stop at an inn and conduct a storytelling contest. In this work, Chaucer not only creates a fictional cross-section of British society in his time but does so by having each of his travelers tell his or her story in a literary genre suited to his or her station in life. For example, the Knight, a noble, tells a romance; the lower-class Miller tells a fabliau, or dirty tale; the middle-class Wife of Bath tells an Arthurian legend; the Nun’s Priest tells a beast fable, or story with personified animals as the main characters; and the Second Nun tells of a saint’s life. In this fashion, Chaucer creates a compendium of literary genres fashionable in his time, in addition to providing a glimpse of British attitudes toward social, political, and religious issues in his day, and his work therefore serves as an excellent example of the use of memory to construct collective identity. The British romantics transformed the use of memory in literature, often basing their writing on earlier forms and themes, upon which they embroidered a highly personal nostalgia and quest for identity. William Wordsworth’s “Lines Composed A Few Miles above Tintern Abbey” is widely acknowledged as the work that ushered in the romantic movement. As the narrator returns to a spot he visited years earlier, he is swept away by the changes in the abbey and in himself, while simultaneously delighting in the eternal quality of the countryside surrounding him. The inclusion of personal memory in the form of nostalgia, married to collective memory in the public form of the abbey itself, demonstrates the power of memory to evoke strong emotion. John Keats similarly makes
use of the individual/collective dichotomy in his “Ode on a Grecian Urn,” in which he observes the eternal images painted on an ancient vase, constructs stories about them derived from his knowledge of ancient culture, and simultaneously considers his own ephemeral place in time. His recollection of history, fused with his own mortality, render the poem highly emotional. Rather than using memory to underscore textual legitimacy or to convey national ideology, the romantics employed it to evoke nostalgia and to highlight personal conflicts in the search for identity. Marcel Proust furthered the evolution of memory in his monumental autobiographical novel Remembrance of Things Past. In this work, Proust is plunged into memories of his childhood through the taste of a madeleine (small cake) dipped in tea. From the original flashback evoked by the taste of the cake, he maps an inner landscape of the mind through further mental associations with that first, sense-based moment, thus evolving the story from a single memory to a vast panorama of identity constructed through memory. This work more than any other has profoundly impacted the use of memory in modern literature; with it, Proust wrested memory entirely from its original use as a means of establishing textual authority and national character, recreating it as a means of personal exploration of self and the world. Twentieth-century writers have tended to follow Proust’s use of association in the construction of memory. Perhaps the single best example of this is T. S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land.” A modern poem about the collapse of tradition and history and the struggle for identity in the wake of World War I, “The Waste Land” is a masterwork of association, employing allusions to historical events, contemporary affairs, literature, music, art, the occult, science, astronomy, important centers of learning and culture, and various figures (both real and fictional) to underscore the impoverished state of postwar society. Eliot’s use of memory is a subversion of the traditional; his is a construction of memory as that which has been forgotten. He employs vast references to the past in order to underscore their absence in the present. Panoramas of ancient cities such as Alexandria and cultural centers such as
nationalismâ•…â•… 71 Vienna, the pageantry of Shakespeare’s Cleopatra on the barge, the splendor of Elizabeth I’s reign, the glory of King Arthur’s legend, and the foundational humanity of Ovid’s mythological figures are juxtaposed with the garbage of modern picnickers floating down the Thames River, with throngs of dejected workers filing down the streets of London and with an overall barrenness in the modern landscape, in order to highlight the national and personal crises of identity that for Eliot marked the modern era. His work, then, not only serves as a sort of compendium of European culture but also as a call to mindfulness in the reader; through the authority of the objects, events, and people incorporated in his allusions, the reader is free to indulge in nostalgia for the great moments of the past as well as to make associations with them, leading to highly personal questions of identity and nationalism. In the modern world, then, memory is as important as ever as a means of establishing authority, evoking nostalgia, and helping to forge personal and national identity. See also Bambara, Toni Cade: Salt Eaters, The; Cather, Willa: My Ántonia; Dickens, Charles: David Copperf ield; Ellison, Ralph: Invisible Man; García Márquez, Gabriel: One Hundred Years of Solitude; Joyce, James: Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, A; Momaday, N. Scott: Way to Rainy Mountain, The; O’Neill, Eugene: Long Day’s Journey into Night; Rhys, Jean: Wide Sargasso Sea; Rushdie, Salman: Midnight ’s Children; Welty, Eudora: Optimist ’s Daughter, The; Wiesel, Elie: Night; Wilder, Thornton: Our Town; Williams, Tennessee: Glass Menagerie, The; Woolf, Virginia: To the Lighthouse. FURTHER READING Carruthers, Mary. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Ender, Evelyne. Architexts of Memory: Literature, Science, and Autobiography. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005. McConky, James, ed. The Anatomy of Memory: An Anthology. Oxford University Press, 1996. Middleton, Peter, and Tim Woods. Literature of Memory: History, Time and Space in Post-War Writing.
Manchester, Eng.: Manchester University Press, 2001. Nalbantian, Suzanne. Memory in Literature: From Rousseau to Neuroscience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Melissa Ridley-Elmes
nationalism
Many scholars have struggled to define the term nationalism in a way that encompasses and makes sense of all the different situations in which it is employed. In general, it is an ideology in which nationality is a category by which humans define themselves. Nationalism necessarily categorizes people—one either is or is not a member of “my nation.” It thrives through the use of such elements as national folklore, symbols, heroes, sports, music, religion, and the idea that there is a national identity or character. Anthony D. Smith, a theorist of nationalism, has suggested that there are criteria that must be in place for nationalism to exist. His list includes a physical homeland, either current or ancient; a high degree of autonomy among the citizens, hostile surroundings, memories of glory or defeat in battle, special customs, historical records, common languages and scripts, and what he calls sacred centers or places (17). This sort of nationalism is highly dependent on the concept of the nation-state and probably represents the most common use of the term. It has been used to justify imperialism, to unite countries in times of war, and to describe the struggles for nationhood in colonized countries such as Ireland and India. However, nationalism has also been used to describe movements within sovereign nations, such as the black nationalist movement in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s and the Hindu nationalism currently seen in India. American Indian activists have also called for American Indian nationalism, especially given that many of their tribes are sovereign nations themselves. One of the reasons nationalism is so difficult to define is that any discussion involving the subject necessarily spills over into cognate subjects such as race and racism, fascism and other ideologies, language development, international law, genocide, and immigration. In addition, nationalism can take
72â•…â•… nationalism many different forms, with the central factor upon which a movement is based being, for instance, religious, political, ethnic, or cultural. This further confuses the way the term is used and defined. In the latter half of the 18th century, for instance, the people of France had successfully united under such symbols as the tricolor flag, the sentimental power of the anthem “The Marseillaise,” and the ideals of liberté, egalité, fraternité (liberty, equality, fraternity). This type of patriotism allowed the nation to feel as one in a way that had not been possible before the French Revolution. For the French, at least in overthrowing the monarchy, the loyalty inspired by nationalism helped to create a “free” society, the goal of the Revolution. Throughout the 19th century, however, nationalism would be used to justify imperialism, jingoism, and xenophobia in countries such as Great Britain, the United States, Italy, and France itself. Some scholars also attribute the 20th-century rise of fascism to nationalism taken to its extreme. In the late 20th century, the term came to be used most often to describe indigenous movements seeking autonomy, equality, and recognition. Most broadly, the term has been used to describe the way the people of a country define themselves. The idea that a “nation” is an entity, an identifiable thing moving forward through time, is a relatively new one, having only been around since the 18th century or so. Although some historians believe that the “concept” of nationalism existed even in tribal communities and has probably been around since the beginning of humanity, modern theorists place its origins at the beginning of the 18th century. Before that period, they say, no one had more than local interests. Nationalism, for these theorists, was made possible by the Industrial Revolution, the widespread use of the printing press, and the rise of capitalism. All of these things relied on a large, literate, and culturally homogeneous population for their success. These theories, expounded by people such as Benedict Anderson and Ernest Gellner, argue that nationalism is a “socially constructed” phenomenon. In other words, they believe that it is an artificial designation, imposed on the denizens of a country for social or political purposes. This belief does not reduce the power of the concept but merely suggests that it is not a real, organic phenomenon arising
from the true feelings and motives of the country’s people. As viable political entities, nations must concern themselves with defining what it means to be a nation. This is a challenge even for the most homogenous linguistically and historically bound people, but it is a concern that is crucial to their existence. Literature, as a vehicle, helps to express nationalist ideas particularly well. If nations or nationalist movements are indeed identifiable entities moving forward in time, they need to speak, and literature gives them a voice to do just that. Postrevolutionary America, for instance, needed to come to terms with its independence, as well as to establish and put forward a national character. Washington Irving’s The Sketchbook of Geoffrey Crayon (1819) depicts characters struggling with these ideas. In one of Irving’s most famous stories, “Rip Van Winkle,” the main character goes to sleep for 20 years and wakes up in a world unfamiliar to him. What was once a pleasant, sleepy community now seems, to Rip, like a busy, contentious place, rife with disagreement. The American Revolution has taken place while he slept, but instead of focusing on political matters, Irving uses Rip to show the reader how daily life has changed in those lost years—daily life being more important than politics in the life of an ordinary man. This reading helped early Americans take a step toward defining the national character of the fledgling country; it also helped readers understand the pain of independence from the mother country. Similarly, in William Butler Yeats’s poetry, metaphors for national character and the struggle toward independence abound. In poems such as “The Stolen Child,” “Chuchulain’s Fight with the Sea,” “Who Goes with Fergus?,” and the long poem “The Wanderings of Oisin,” Yeats strives to invoke old Ireland, mystical and Celtic, in order to create for the modern country a precolonial image to which it might aspire. Ireland was the oldest of England’s colonies, held for nearly 800 years, and an obstacle for Irish nationalists was finding a way to clearly distinguish what was Irish from what was English. Yeats was such a nationalist poet, however, that he did not merely speak in metaphors. Much of his commentary on nationalism is not figurative at
natureâ•…â•… 73 all but is explored literally, in largely unambiguous language. In poems such as “Easter 1916,” “To Ireland in the Coming Times,” and “The Irish Airman Foresees his Death,” Yeats is explicit, mourning the loss of lives in the struggle for independence and noting the toll that years of oppression have taken on the Irish character. While both Irving and Yeats were working with countries struggling with defining their identities against the specter of English dominance, in 1897 Bram Stoker’s novel Dracula addressed the difficulty of nationalism and England itself. Count Dracula, whom Stoker portrays as everything that is foreign to England and the English characters, seeks to capture Mina, whose purity, intelligence, and kindness make her a perfect symbol of Victorian womanhood. In contrast, Dracula is mysterious, speaking in heavily accented English and living in a remote castle in Transylvania. He is Eastern as opposed to the very Western Mina, and worst of all, he is believed to be a vampire, the undead creature from eastern European folklore. In his quest, Dracula purchases various pieces of real estate around London so that he may have resting places to protect him should he be caught outside as the sun rises. He has transported native soil from his homeland to deposit in these locations. This represents a kind of reverse colonialism, with the foreigner imposing himself upon England during the heyday of Victorian imperialism. The “good” character—that is, the English—must unite to destroy the foreign menace and thus save the character of their nation. Other literary works, such as Salman Rushdie’s Midnight ’s Children (1983), are openly critical of nationalist movements, portraying them as dehumanizing groups that stress unity over humanity. In Midnight’s Children, both the Indian nationalist movement and the Indo-Pakistani War (a nationalist-driven war) come very close to destroying the future of India, all for the advancement of the idea of a strong, homogenous, modern nation. Just as nationalism itself is a term that is difficult to define, literary portrayals of nationalism take many different forms and approach the subject from many different angles. Minority groups, dominant religions and ethnicities, and political entities (both new and long-established) may all embrace the ide-
ology of nationalism. Literature, with its many layers of meaning, can express this ideology in support of all these different groups. See also Atwood, Margaret: Surfacing; Fielding, Henry: Tom Jones; Forster, E. M.: Passage to India, A; Hemingway, Ernest: Farewell to Arms, A; Houston, Jeanne Wakatsuki: Farewell to Manzanar; Kipling, Rudyard: Kim; Machiavelli, Niccolò: P rince, The; Naipaul, V. S.: Bend in the River, A; Poe, Edgar Allan: “Murders in the Rue Morgue, The”; Shakespeare, William: Henry V; Merchant of Venice; The; Much Ado about Nothing. FURTHER READING Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London and New York: Verso, 2006. Corse, Patricia. Nationalism and Literature: The Politics of Culture in Canada and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Ignatieff, Michael. Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism. London: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1995. Kohn, Hans, and Craig Calhoun. Nationalism: A Study in Its Origins and Background. Edison, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 2005. Smith, Anthony D. Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History. London: Polity Press, 2001.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
nature
Nature, taken broadly as the earth’s physical phenomena, is omnipresent, in literature as in life. Just as we do not live and function in a vacuum, literary events cannot transpire without some type of space, some sort of environment, however basic or unconventional it might be. But other than this initial stipulation that nature pervades all literature, further universals are difficult to defend. Perhaps the only other truth ascribable to the role of nature in literature is that it has demonstrated near-constant fluidity, from the dawn of English letters to the contemporary era. Many early texts utilize nature to describe origin. North American Indian tribes such as the Iroquois and the Pima told nature-focused creation stories.
74â•…â•… nature Homer in The Iliad and The Odyssey, Virgil in The Aeneid, and the early English poet Caedmon explain how a people came to inhabit the specific landscape they do. Beowulf (Anonymous) dramatizes the defense of one’s turf. Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales lend further to the trope of journey as tale, tale as journey, thereby paralleling nature and the act of storytelling itself. John Milton’s Paradise Lost even details heaven and hell as determinants of human consciousness, thereby deeming the eternal and ethereal as influential spaces as well. But throughout the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, and the Restoration, nature was, for the most part, allocated the role of backdrop—a mere canvas upon which the acts of humans were transposed. Occasional personification aside, nature was rarely afforded the power of agency. The romantic period (1785–1830) saw nature utilized as more of a primary subject matter than previously. William Shakespeare’s comparisons of women to summer’s days yielded to the direct treatment of seasonal splendor by William Blake (Songs of Innocence and of Experience), William Wordsworth (“Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey”), and Percy Bysshe Shelley, who celebrated nature as an inspiration and thereby ascribed it the role of muse, a position previously allocated to the divine. But while nature certainly plays a part in writings of the “Old World,” it was truly the genesis and flourishing of American literature that eventually repositioned it as a central, rather than merely a peripheral, thematic element, replete even with agency. As opposed to the letters produced in the well-known, exhaustively mapped countryside of Great Britain and Europe, those of the Western Hemisphere were recorded by pioneers in the throes of attempting to explore—both physically and intellectually—the immensity of an unforgiving foreign wilderness. These prenational, or colonial, writings are most recognizable by the strong and overt religious sentiment they propound. Tracts drafted by Puritans emigrating from Europe to New England promulgated strict Calvinism, by which humankind was placed on a pedestal above the natural world due to the favor shown it in the Bible, particularly in
the creation of man as the pinnacle of God’s work. This anthropocentric worldview traveled across the Atlantic with emigrants who sought to civilize the “savage” wild into which they were moving: The wilderness was seen as being in need of the doctrine they promulgated, as salvation was to be found not in the forests but in civilization, a divergent absolute from the “trickster” tales of the Winnebago, Sioux, Navajo, and other Native American tribes, in which natural elements and creatures display, paradoxically, a certain consistent unpredictability when interacting with people. The Puritans frowned on this subjectivity, maintaining instead that wilderness was the realm of beasts, of evil—this was the scene of Christ’s temptation, after all, the post-Fall wasteland. The key, they believed, was to carve out their own space and to introduce the word of God to the deprived landscape that lay before them. If paradise could be regained, it was not in the trees themselves but in their felling. Churches were needed to subordinate the wickedness of the uncouth wilderness to Providence, illustrated efficiently by the shining “city upon a hill” envisioned by John Winthrop in his sermon A Model of Christian Charity, delivered as a mission statement of sorts while en route from England in 1630. The concrete physical situation of the suggestion conveys the goal of these refugees: The realm of humans, the organized city, will be, quite literally, constructed above nature. Following independence, a new challenge presented itself to the now “American” authors. As former British subjects became pioneering patriots, the question of their interaction with their surroundings followed logically—that is, we know how subjects of the Crown treat nature, but what of American citizens? Merely regurgitating the ideology of those against whom they had fought so hard and long for independence lacked ambition at best, and seemed dangerously cyclical at worst. Hence, the initial American literati focused primarily on this new man, this fresh being (whom the 20th-century literary critic R. W. B Lewis would deem “the American Adam” in his work of the same name) reborn on a still largely unknown continent. The French-American writer J. Hector St. John de Crèvecoeur explored this creature as a product of its space. Washington Irving’s fiction, especially
natureâ•…â•… 75 The Sketchbook of Geoffrey Crayon, depicted the ever-evolving Dutch settlements of New York. James Fenimore Cooper’s five-volume Leatherstocking Tales follow Natty Bumppo—a European emigrant who consistently becomes more native in his lifestyle and politics—from the East Coast into the wilderness, all the way to the Rocky Mountains. And while all three writers concern themselves with the overarching issue of what it means to be American, they do so by deliberating specifically on the individual’s position within his or her environment. Quite literally, they focus on the situation of the early American. Furthermore, tough questions regarding Puritan fervor began to intensify (as demonstrated, most prominently, in the works of Nathaniel Hawthorne), leaving the door open for a new consideration of humankind’s relationship to nature, one which would be provided by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Emerson, a Unitarian minister living in Concord, Massachusetts, was notably affected by the romantic movement and desired, for his young country, a literature of its own. His consideration of European idealism—thoughts advanced by Immanuel Kant, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and Thomas Carlyle, among others—led to his own brand of American transcendentalism, an ontological inspection in which nature factored centrally. Emerson believed that humankind had strayed from its course, thereby blurring the innate divinity by which all souls relate to each other and to God. The way to recover this lost relationship was present in nature, which, Emerson maintained, functioned as a sort of blueprint through which we could witness the mind of God. His ideas, though initially quite controversial when published in his long essay Nature (1836), gradually became more mainstream, particularly since they were advocated by the stable of talented writers with whom he surrounded himself in Concord. Margaret Fuller augmented her feminist societal critiques with natural observations. Henry David Thoreau lent Emerson’s abstractions practical examples in Walden, his account of two years spent living in the woods. Walt Whitman poeticized Emerson’s promotion of nature in his passionate tome Leaves of Grass. Emerson even sought to take the future outdoorsman and “wild man” John Muir under his
wing, but Muir preferred his California home. But just as the movement that sought to rewrite nature as sacred rather than subordinate began gaining momentum, the Civil War and the resultant economic slump, coupled with urbanization, instead led writers concerned with the natural world in a new, less hospitable direction. And so while nature was portrayed as an enlightening, esteemed realm for much of the mid-1800s, by the turn of the century this favorable depiction was replaced with caustic naturalist depictions that reflected the acerbic times. Literary naturalists refuted the pessimistic and optimistic natural views employed by the Puritans and transcendentalists, respectively, opting instead to allow nature to define itself. Previously popular natural personifications were eschewed in favor of more objective environmental renderings. These purportedly more realistic representations envisioned the outdoors as neither malevolent nor beneficent, but instead indifferent. Jack London’s tales, including The Call of the Wild and White Fang, depict an Alaskan interior unforgiving to both man and beast, whereas Stephen Crane’s works illustrate similar themes within the context of a gritty metropolis. Over the last century or so, the growth of the environmental movement has increased—and politicized—the role of nature in literature. John Muir founded the Sierra Club in 1892. The First World War inspired T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land, an exposé of a once-promising landscape rendered dismal and hopeless at the hands of humankind. The ecologist Aldo Leopold, seeking to heal, at mid-century proposed his “land ethic,” asserting that decisions affecting nature should be considered neither economically nor commercially but morally. The environmentalist Edward Abbey scolded civilization’s convenience-based impingement on the wilderness. The writer and scientist Rachel Carson, in Silent Spring, warned against the lasting effects of chemical inundation. Transcending the strictly literary, the Wachowski brothers’ postmodern film The Matrix trilogy implores us to call into question the very validity of our perceived surrounding, and the politician Al Gore’s documentary An Inconvenient Truth has proved a powerful ecocritical text. Thus, while the precise future of natural literature is uncer-
76â•…â•… oppression tain, it seems quite clear that as global warming, overpopulation, and general environmental degradation continue, themes of nature will play increasingly important roles not only in the literature we study but also for the planet on which we live. See also Atwood, Margaret: Surfacing; Bradbury, Ray: Martian Chronicles, The; Cather, Willa: My Ántonia; O Pioneers!; Coleridge, Samuel Taylor: “Rime of the Ancient Mariner, The”; Crane, Stephen: Open Boat, The; Dante Alighieri: Divine Comedy, The; Dickinson, Emily: poems; Dinesen, Isak: Out of Africa; Emerson, Ralph Waldo: “SelfReliance”; Forster, E. M.: Room with a View, A; Frost, Robert: poems; Harte, Bret: “Luck of Roaring Camp, The”; Hemingway, Ernest: Old Man and the Sea, The; Jefferson, Thomas: Notes on the State of Virginia; Keats, John: poems; Kingsolver, Barbara: Bean Trees, The; Lewis, C. S.: Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, The; McCarthy, Cormac: All the P retty Horses; Shakespeare, William: Midsummer Night ’s Dream, A; Steinbeck, John: Pearl, The; Red Pony, The; Wilde, Oscar: Picture of Dorian Gray, The. FURTHER READING Anderson, Lorraine, Scott Slovic, and John P. O’Grady. Literature and the Environment: A Reader on Nature and Culture. New York: Longman, 1998. Keegan, Bridget, and James M. McKuzick, eds. Literature and Nature: Four Centuries of Nature Writing. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2000.
David Visser
oppression
As a concept frequently found in historical and sociological texts, oppression is typically defined in terms of a dominant group subjugating another minority group. In Race and Ethnic Relations (1985), Martin N. Marger explains that a sociological minority and a mathematical minority are not the same. Mathematically, a group can be the majority and yet still be victims of an oppression imposed by a more powerful yet numerically smaller dominant group. He goes on to delineate the qualities of oppressed minorities by detailing how they receive differential treatment,
as they are not afforded the same rights and privileges as the dominant group. Additionally, Marger notes that minority groups are socially denied, have differential power, and are treated categorically (all members are defined by group status as opposed to individually) (37–38). Also, dominant groups can be distinguished culturally, economically, and politically (41). With this diversity in mind, the theme of oppression would include all of the “-isms” we have come to identify with prejudice. It can be based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, political or national affiliation, age, physical or mental disability, religion, and other factors. In his authoritative The Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1970), Paulo Friere identifies several characteristics of oppressive societies. For example, oppressors often refer to the oppressed in nonhuman terms. Correspondingly, oppression is against the ideals of humanity because it prevents people within the oppressed group from being fully human (43). In her article “Oppression,” Marilyn Frye expands on this: “The experience of oppressed people is that the living of one’s life is confined and shaped by forces and barriers which are not accidental or occasional and hence avoidable, but are systematically related to each other in such a way as to catch one between and among them and restrict or penalize motion in any direction” (40). This definition helps bring about a distinction between injustice and oppression. Whereas injustice can occur at any level, the more specific concept of oppression involves a systemic structure that shapes and restricts the life of an oppressed population. In Privilege, Power, and Difference, Allan G. Johnson describes the two sides of the oppressive society as the privileged and the oppressed. This terminology implies that the members who are receiving the benefits of the societal structure may not be actively oppressive toward others. Sometimes one is a member of a privileged group without feeling particularly dominant. However, membership in the majority group opens doors for members while membership in oppressed groups tends to shut doors. Interestingly, Friere asserts that the oppressed, rather than standing up against all tyranny, often become “sub-oppressors” against others within their minority group (45). This can be seen in Alice
oppressionâ•…â•… 77 Walker’s The Color Purple and Zora Neale Hurston’s Their Eyes Were Watching God, where the oppressed black men further subjugate the black women. Thus, the black women in the novels are doubly oppressed in their rural southern societies. This is specifically addressed in Their Eyes Were Watching God when the protagonist Janie is told by her grandmother that black women are the mules of the world. While the black men are oppressed by white society, according to Nanny, the black women are oppressed by both the white power structure and black men. This is also seen in the experiences of Celie, who for much of The Color Purple is beaten and oppressed by her husband, Mr. ——. In this novel, even Celie, who is subjugated for most of her life, encourages her stepson Harpo to beat his strong-willed wife, Sofia. In Friere’s view, Celie has become so enmeshed in a culture of oppression that she does not see it as aberrant. Oppression, with all its diverse implications, has been apparent throughout much of time. For example, in the Bible, not only are the Jews oppressed by the Egyptians and the Syrians, but the women of the Old Testament are also faced with laws that are inequitable. In fact, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, the earliest recorded use of the word oppression in the English language was in a 1382 version of the Bible. As an example of female oppression, in the book of Exodus, it is indicated that it is permissible to sell one’s daughters into slavery. Unlike sons who were sold into slavery, daughters were not released after a six-year period; they remained slaves. Similar to examining the religious text of the Bible, one needs only look at various historical periods to see countless examples of groups oppressed by others. Two modern examples of oppression are the apartheid of South Africa and Adolf Hitler’s oppression and persecution of the Jewish people. South African apartheid was a system of legalized racism and segregation enforced by the National Party government. In this society, marginalized populations, particularly “black” and “colored” (which was a mixed-race designation), were subjected to laws restricting where they resided, their right to voting, their ability to marry or engage in sexual relations with members of other races, where they
could work, and eventually their ability to be citizens. Similarly, the Jewish people of Hitler’s Germany were subjected to extremely differential treatment. The Nuremburg Laws prohibited marriage and sexual relations between Jews and Germans and stripped Jewish people of citizenship. Laws prohibiting where, and eventually if, Jewish people could work and be educated were part of the path that led to the Holocaust. The memoirs Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl, by Anne Frank, and Night, by Elie Wiesel, document the oppressive experience of subjugated people living in Nazi Germany. Both of these periods are emblematic of the oppression that permeates history. Since the works written in each era can be seen to reflect the zeitgeist of that period, and since oppression is so prevalent in history, it makes sense that it can be identified in works from multiple eras, countries, and cultural/social groups. At times, the works have been written purposefully to demonstrate the evils of the oppression, as in Richard Wright’s Native Son, a novel in which the author presents the oppressive racism of America in the 1930s, as experienced by his protagonist, Bigger Thomas. Sometimes, the works studied will not intentionally describe the oppressive system; instead, through their illustration of the social structure and mores of their times, they depict oppressions that critics can analyze. For instance, literary scholars frequently examine William Shakespeare’s play The Taming of the Shrew and analyze the oppression of women. Whether or not Shakespeare intended to subvert or uphold the patriarchy of his time, his play can still be studied to analyze the oppression of women. In terms of literary theory, critics did not always address the oppression in works. It became most apparent with the emergence of fields of criticism that are sociologically and culturally based. Because of its diverse dimensions, the theme of oppression is evident in many of these fields of literary study. For example, analyses of oppression are explored in gender studies, cultural studies, Marxist criticism, feminist criticism, postcolonial criticism, queer theory, and other sociologically influenced branches of criticism. To illustrate, books addressing South African apartheid would be of particular interest
78â•…â•… parenthood to postcolonial critics, who examine the works produced in or written about countries that have been subject to European colonial powers in their history. Since apartheid was instituted in a colonial area, where the colonizer was oppressing the native residents, works addressing this area would fall within the scope of postcolonial studies. Similarly, in feminist criticism, works would be examined to see how the patriarchal society dominates women. Historically, an admonition of patriarchal oppression can be found as far back as Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792). In this manifesto, Wollstonecraft contends that familial tyranny is unjust, that women should be educated, and that the differentiation of the sexes should cease. Many feminist texts have emerged over the years. The works of Virginia Woolf, Kate Chopin, Margaret Atwood, and Toni Morrison are often analyzed to demonstrate the oppression of women. Racial oppression is frequently treated in literature. While this includes much of postcolonial studies, it is not limited to them. In American literature, there are poignant examples of racial oppression. As a documentation of the slavery of blacks in America, Frederick Douglass’s Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, authenticates the experience of living in a dominated minority during the 1800s. Poetically, Langston Hughes’s works arising out of the Harlem Renaissance illuminate the oppression of black Americans at that time. One of the best examples of this is seen in his poem “I, Too,” which is an answer to Walt Whitman’s famous “I Hear America Singing.” In this, as in many of his works, Hughes asserts black humanity, one of the major focuses of the Harlem Renaissance. Remembering Friere’s point that oppressors dehumanize the oppressed, the need for the dominated to assert their humanity is understandable. In the poem, Hughes uses the metaphor of being sent to eat in the kitchen when company comes to represent the differential treatment of this era. The poem clearly subverts the current social system, and Hughes writes that the oppressed will grow stronger, indicating that one day they will bring down the oppressors. However, although the poem indicates the oppressed will rise
up against the dominant, it ends with the hopeful wish that the oppressors will see their mistake and change the system themselves. These works present a small sampling of oppression evident throughout much of literature. See also Achebe, Chinua: Anthills of the Savannah; Things Fall Apart; Allende, Isabel: House of the Spirits, The; Atwood, Margaret: Handmaid ’s Tale, The; Black Elk: Black Elk Speaks; Kesey, Ken: One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest; Kincaid, Jamaica: Small Place, A; Kundera, Milan: Unbearable Lightness of Being, The; London, Jack: White Fang; Mistry, Rohinton: Fine Balance, A; Paine Thomas: Common Sense; Rand, Ayn: Anthem; Reed, Ishmael: Mumbo Jumbo. FURTHER READING Awkward, Michael. Negotiating Difference: Race, Gender, and the Politics of Positionality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. Friere, Paulo. The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum, 1993. Frye, Marilyn. “Oppression.” In Race, Class, and Gender: An Anthology, edited by Margaret L. Andersen and Patricia Hill Collins, 37–41. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1992. Johnson, Allan G. Privilege, Power, and Difference. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001. Marger, Martin N. Race and Ethnic Relations: American and Global Perspectives. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 2006. Oppenheimer, Martin. The Hate Handbook: Oppressors, Victims, and Fighters. New York: Lexington Books, 2005. Smith, Barbara. “Toward a Black Feminist Criticism.” In All the Women Are White, All the Blacks Are Men, But Some of Us Are Brave: Black Women’s Studies, edited by Gloria T. Hull, Patricia Bell Scott, and Barbara Smith, Old Westbury, N.Y.: Feminist Press, 1982, 157–175.
Tracey L. Marticek-Raimondo
parenthood
Parenthood has been defined as a process of rearing children. According to contemporary standards, “parenthood” involves a number of daily responsi-
parenthoodâ•…â•… 79 bilities and financial and affective obligations such as the education and instruction of one’s children. The notion of “parenthood” also presupposes an active concern for a child’s welfare and physical and intellectual development. Initially, parenthood was concerned with teaching the taboo—what is forbidden—and with inculcating basic rules and restrictions to the young. Later on, parenthood began to be seen as a longer process of nurturing that was increasingly centered on the concept of caring. Such was the case with certain utopian societies founded on the American continent (for example, the Owenite societies of the 19th century), which developed some of the first kindergartens. Children were raised and educated together, and society itself was engaged in a collective effort of parenting. The same concept was developed in Europe at almost the same time. In fact, defining parenthood is a recent preoccupation, but the concerns and worries of parenthood are as old as the world. As early as ca. 440 b.c., the Greek tragedian Sophocles produced a series of plays—Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, and Antigone. Without mentioning “parenthood” explicitly, the trilogy’s plots develop a familial tragedy, based on a hereditary curse, and discuss the problems of knowledge, ignorance, destiny, and personal choice as related to the denial/rejection of parenthood and abandonment. Oedipus is a victim, an abandoned child, threatened with death by his father, while Antigone is the daughter of the incestuous relationship between Oedipus and his mother, Jocasta. Epitomizing the major family taboos, the figure of Oedipus is extensively referred to in child psychology since the Austrian psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud explored the myth in the light of a father and mother’s unconscious feelings regarding the early stages of parenthood. Antigone, on the other hand, is in total opposition to the will of the king. She acts against the orders of the “parent” of the nation, obeying her instinct of filial duty. It has also been suggested that her name means “opposed to motherhood.” Her behavior engenders destruction, while the outcome of the tragedy implies that there are different levels of parental allegiance. In the same fashion, English literature of the 16th and 17th centuries was concerned with the
structure of the world as God’s supreme creation and introduced a complex, layered structure of parentchild relationships. The political and religious climate favoured biblical examples of parenthood; the attempted sacrifice of Isaac by his father Abraham is a case in point. It demonstrated that God was the father of humanity and that humanity was to obey. Humanity’s allegiance to God was likened to a child’s obedience to its parents. This reasoning was a part of what is known as “the great chain of being,” a conception of the world as a strictly hierarchical system composed of intricate links and interactions. It was frequently alluded to in John Milton’s Paradise Lost, and it was also much utilized by William Shakespeare in his tragedies, including Romeo and Juliet and Hamlet. Both plays introduce us to strict, forbidding parents whose word is law. Every opposition to their wishes on the domestic or public level has diverse implications on the scale of the great chain of being. Hamlet’s revolt brings political change, while Romeo and Juliet’s deaths launch a reconciliation of the feuding families. The authority of parenthood in both plays is the highest authority conceivable. In Macbeth, on the other hand, the fear of disobedience to the king is essentially a fear of causing imbalance on a natural and divine level. The fragile balance of power is disturbed by the murder of the kingdom’s wise and just parent, and even the supernatural demonstrate their fury at the deed. The 18th century was the century of reason, and concepts of parenthood were significantly modified. The anxiety and fear of confrontation were transposed from the level of the state to that of the family cell, and the notion of exercising effective parental control on the child’s development gradually emerged. Conduct and advice books, written for both parents and children, were very common throughout the 18th century and well into the 19th. The correct methods for educating one’s children and the basics of good behavior in society were the main concerns of such works. Concurrently, a strong tradition of educational theory was founded with the publication of John Locke’s Thoughts Concerning Education (1692), and it spread to the writings of Daniel Defoe (e.g., The Family Instructor, 1715), Anna Laetitia Barbauld (Early Lessons, 1781), Maria
80â•…â•… parenthood Edgeworth (Parent’s Assistant, 1796, and Practical Education, 1798), and many minor authors of the late 1780s and the 1790s. An interesting but also extreme example is the moralizing of the notorious Thomas Day (Sandford and Merton, 1783–89) who adopted two sisters with the hope of raising one or the other as his wife. His purpose was to instill in their minds all the characteristics that made the perfect woman as he saw her. Rumors of mistreatment and even torture were circulated, and he abandoned the experiment. In 1719, Daniel Defoe published Robinson Crusoe and suggested that a child’s flight from paternal authority and protection is not a solution. His economic man established a new paternalistic state, and the father-son relationship between Crusoe and Friday have been interpreted as economic, political, and social ideals, though they can actually be seen as a simulation of perfect, natural parenthood. Crusoe enlightens Friday on moral and religious matters, while Friday demonstrates submission to his spiritual parent. Twenty years later, Samuel Richardson’s Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded presented a very interesting form of passive parenthood. This epistolary novel insists on the fact that even though outside the sphere of parental protection, the virtuous offspring should follow her parents’ moral principles in her quest for happiness. In a series of letters, Pamela complains of the treatment she receives, only to be rewarded by matrimonial happiness and parenthood herself. The later 18th and earlier 19th centuries saw the rise of new fears and quite a few revivals of the incest taboo, a widespread gothic theme. The gothic novel of the second half of the 18th century was very much concerned with parenthood; with issues of succession and usurpation of birthright; and with heritage and extended, increasingly complex family ties. It depicted the dissolution of the nuclear family and the psychological instability generated by guilty or adoptive parents. As a natural fin de siècle continuation of this literary current, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) is about the monster made by man, reflecting Shelley’s own childbirth and parenting fears. It also introduces a new literary theme that would be explored throughout the 19th and 20th centuries: The creator is also a parent
to be held responsible for his creation. The period also saw some pre-Freudian, post-gothic musings by Edgar Allan Poe. In his “Ligeia” (1838), Poe reflects on the obsessive behavior of a father figure, linking eroticism and parenthood into a narrative of morbid incest. The 18th and 19th centuries were concerned with establishing models for the roles of parents of both sexes, consigning the women to the domestic sphere and the men to the public sphere. Such ideas of parenthood were driven by family narratives, autobiographies, and instruction booklets but also by many novels. The mothers would provide care to the younger children and girls, while fathers were considered responsible for the education of elder children—boys in particular. Parenthood became at once a duty and an obligation. Some of the paintings and drawings of J. E. Millais depict the ideal family and present the image of successful parenthood (e.g., The Young Mother, 1857; The Crawley Family, 1860; The Ruling Passion, 1885). Much in the same fashion, the beginning of Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women announces the typical family structure with Beth’s famous “We’ve got Father and Mother, and each other.” Alcott’s book is said to represent the female revolt against 19th-century assumptions that a “female genius” cannot be a parent, but it also explores the cult of femininity, of childbearing and parenting—roles to be contested by some feminists but advocated by others. In this respect, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter displays a challenging plot based on an innovative theme. Beyond the most obvious problem of original sin lies a discussion of the hardships of single parenthood. It also develops the stereotype of the “Madonna with Child,” raising parenthood to a higher level. In The House of the Seven Gables, Hawthorne goes back to the theme of the heritage parents leave to their children, much in line with Horace Walpole’s The Castle of Otranto (1764). However, Hawthorne is more concerned with hereditary transmission of sin than with the practical problems of parenthood. Thomas Hardy’s The Mayor of Casterbridge (1886) also goes back to an old theme, that of the abandoned child. Instead of focusing on the child itself, Hardy depicts the life of the parent, haunted by guilt and the painful souvenir of past parenthood.
prideâ•…â•… 81 In an attempt to expiate the sin of abandonment, the main character becomes mayor. The impulse to compensate for his wrongdoing makes him the parent of an entire town. Here we notice a change in perspectives: While the sentimental and gothic novel would focus on the life, adventures, and growing up of the abandoned child, later 19th-century authors chose a perspective that permitted them to explore the psychology of the abandoning parent. Another late 19th-century author who is frequently associated with the intricacies of the parental psyche is Henry James. His The Turn of the Screw is a story told by a governess, concerning dead parents, neglected children, an absent uncle, and disturbed guardians. The psychological frustration accumulates and causes the death of a child, a death that can be taken literally or as a metaphor of the premature death of childhood and innocence. The 20th century saw a number of literary developments and experiments. On the one hand, William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World propose dystopian visions of parenthood. In the first novel, parental control is totally absent from an aggressive, deathly world. The second presents twisted political machinery, as a result of which children send their parents to their deaths. The third speculates about the implications of planned parenthood if carried too far. On the other hand, Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid ’s Tale (1985) focuses on birth as a metaphor of writing and artistic creation. Atwood likens the conception of a story to the conception of a child, and the writing process to a painful delivery. As we have seen, the image of the parent in literature is far from immutable. The relationships and conflicts between parents and children have become recurrent themes in world literature. Some of them are not developed explicitly or intentionally, but they are present nevertheless, and through them we can try and imagine what parenthood was like throughout past centuries. Through diverse forms of literature, society gradually came to conceptualize parenthood, often without making direct reference to the word itself. However, the ramifications of the theme are numerous and provide a rich background for innovative academic research.
See also Hemingway, Ernest: Farewell to Arms, A; Irving, John: World According to Garp, The: Kureishi, Hanif: Buddhist of Suburbia, The; Morrison, Toni: Song of Solomon; Sula; Potok, Chaim: Chosen, The; Silko, Leslie Marmon: American Pastoral; Turgenev, Ivan: Fathers and Sons. FURTHER READING Backus, Margot Gayle. The Gothic Family Romance. Heterosexuality, Child Sacrifice and the Anglo-Irish Colonial Order. Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press, 1999. Erickson, Robert A. Mother Midnight. Birth, Sex, and Fate in Eighteenth-Century Fiction (Defoe, Richardson, and Sterne). New York: AMS Press, 1986. Flint, Christopher. Family Fictions: Narrative and Domestic Relations in Britain, 1688–1798. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1998. Hilton, Mary. Women and the Shaping of the Nation’s Young: Education and Public Doctrine in Britain 1750–1850. Aldershot, Eng.: Ashgate Publishing, 2007. McKeon, Michael. The Secret History of Domesticity— Public, Private, and the Division of Knowledge. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005. Pollock, Linda A. Forgotten Children: Parent-Child Relations from 1500 to 1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Rashkin, Esther. Family Secrets and the Psychoanalysis of Narrative. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992.
Margarita Georgieva
pride
Literature grapples with the question of how and where human beings fit in the scheme of things and how they should best live. Philosophers, religious thinkers, and writers in the Western tradition have seen the human being in an intermediary position between divine beings and lower animals. The ethical teachings of religion and philosophy and their offshoots of drama and literature have emphasized piety: conducting oneself within the proper sphere of human action and in proper relation with fellow human beings. Exceeding those bounds upward would be to aspire to be a god; exceeding those
82â•…â•… pride bounds downward would be to become a beast. In this ethical scheme, pride, understood negatively as an overly high opinion of oneself, figured as a principal human flaw in societies in which divine and human authority were well established. It kept human beings in their place and subjects in order. “Pride goes before a fall,” teaches one famous Hebrew proverb, representative of the cautionary warnings against human overreaching so richly documented in the tradition of the medieval De casibus, Giovanni Boccaccio’s chronicles of the fall of great men. Besides the Judeo-Christian tradition, other great religions of the world—Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Taoism—seem to have their own variant against the sin of pride, suggesting a universal bias against any action that places self-love before universal love, the basis of most religious systems. At the same time, despite these constraints on mortal aspiration, early heroic societies worshipped human excellence, especially in the form of military prowess. Honor in these ancient and medieval warrior societies was achieved through physical strength, skill, and the courage to die in battle for one’s cause. Pride, as an excessive regard for honor, became a focal point in the great epic poems of Homer, who, in particular, was able to capture the psychological drama of heroes acting as human beings with virtues and flaws in situations of crisis. Because of his superior qualities, the Homeric hero was more easily prone to exhibit hubris, roughly translated as excessive pride—as though one is greater than the gods—often expressed through violent acts. A prime example is Achilles in The Iliad, the Greek warrior in the Trojan War, considered to be the first tragic hero in literature. This epic poem explores the consequences of its principal conflict of egos between the Greek commander Agamemnon and Achilles, his greatest warrior, in which both behave in hubristic ways, resulting ultimately in increased harm and death to many on their side. Flaunting his power, Agamemnon shames Achilles publicly by forcing Achilles to deliver to him Briseis, the maiden he has claimed for his own. Despite his righteous anger, Achilles’ decision to withdraw from battle cripples the Greek army and causes thousandfold pains on his comrades, notably his best friend, Patroclus, who, mistaken for Achilles, is killed by the Trojan
commander Hector. Despite his worthy qualities of military prowess, capacity for compassion, and understanding of the human condition, Achilles, in his wrath, commits what is to the Greeks an intolerable insult: the outrageous treatment of slain Hector of dragging the dead body behind his chariot for 12 days before returning it to the Trojans. As in the epic, pride figures importantly in Greek drama, which further explored the ambivalent qualities of the tragic hero in powerful ways. Sophocles’ Oedipus the King explores the religious and social function of myth by examining this Greek hero as an archetype of the scapegoat and the usurping son, centered on the theme of hubris. A close comparison of an oral version of the myth with Sophocles’ dramatic interpretation amplifies not only the tragic vision by which the culture grappled with the limitations of human life but also the playwright’s aesthetic achievement: to get the audience, in Aristotle’s words, both to pity and fear Oedipus’s tragic situation. After hearing the oracle predict that the plague upon his city will not lift until the murderer of his predecessor is punished, Oedipus, king of Thebes, initiates a methodical investigation of the death of the king, only to find out in his role as responsible ruler that he himself is culpable for the murder. This discovery reveals the key irony of Oedipus’s hubristic actions as a young man: his decision to evade a horrible prophecy that he will kill his father and marry his mother only leads him to fulfill it. This very human response reveals an irrational double-mindedness. If he believed the oracle to be true, he should have also believed that it was futile to evade it. Instead, Oedipus hubristically tries to evade the oracle but proceeds so carelessly—reflective of youth’s delusion of invincibility—that he does precisely what he should have forbidden to himself: kill an older man his father’s age, let alone kill anyone, and marry someone his mother’s age. Through his past and present actions, Oedipus gravely transgresses the Delphic oracle’s prescriptions for virtuous life: “Know thyself ” and “Nothing in excess.” Pride is further explored through the myth of Prometheus, the Titan advocate of man, who incurs eternal punishment for his act of bringing fire to humankind. Whether Prometheus is a heroic rebel, a savior, or a hubristic overreacher is a ques-
prideâ•…â•… 83 tion to ponder as one compares Aeschylus’s Prometheus Bound with its later variants, Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, The Modern Prometheus. While Aeschylus presents a philanthropic Prometheus, disobeying the gods’ orders for the benefit of the helpless human race, Marlowe’s tragedy of Faustus plays on both the heroic and the comic tradition, turning the intellectual hero into a trickster, whose desire “to gain a deity” (1.1.65) inevitably shrinks to horseplay as, at the end of Mephistopheles’ indenture period, he himself dissolves into the void of death. Marlowe’s rebellion against God cannot succeed within the prescripted confines of a Christian morality play. In signing away his soul to Satan, Faustus reenacts Lucifer’s revolt against God, filled with “Vain hopes, vain aims, inordinate desires/ Blown up with high conceits engendering pride” ( John Milton, Paradise Lost, 4.809), the queen of sins. Faustus’s victory is rather one of principle: opposing God to satisfy his desire for omnipotence and not backing down in the face of certain defeat. Despite the Christian lesson of the vanity of human pursuits, instructed through the increasing trivialization of his heroic endeavors, Faustus, through Marlowe’s rendering, retains his heroic status simply by undertaking the impossible. Shelley’s Victor Frankenstein, however, is a self-deluded Prometheus who is as unsuccessful as Faustus without the latter’s attribution of heroic rebel. The scientist’s philanthropic endeavors to advance knowledge for humanity’s benefit—or more accurately, his solipsistic fantasies of fathering a new race—are belied by his foolish neglect of the loved ones around him, thus his inability to prevent their deaths, a direct result of his hubristic creation of a humanoid without assuming the consequent parental obligations toward him. As many of these literary examples indicate, pride entails not only transgressions against divine authority but also infractions against fellow human beings. Jane Austen insightfully dramatizes the woes that come when pride and prejudice rule in Pride and P rejudice. Fitzwilliam Darcy, a wealthy member of the landed gentry, acquires the reputation in Hertfordshire of being a proud aristocrat when he arrogantly refuses to dance at the Netherfield ball and slights Elizabeth Bennet as being only
“tolerable” (7). Her friend, Charlotte Lucas, defends Darcy’s pride by claiming that “so very fine a young man [as he], with family, fortune, every thing in his favour, should think highly of himself. If I may so express it, he has a right to be proud.” With her vanity wounded, Elizabeth replies, “I could easily forgive his pride, if he had not mortified mine” (13). After setting up this misunderstanding, Austen takes 59 chapters to bridge the gap between Darcy’s arrogance vis-à-vis Elizabeth and her prejudice against him toward reconciliation and marriage. According to Aristotle, pride is the proper mean between humility and vanity, for the rightly proud man “claims what is in accordance with his merits, while the others go to excess or fall short” (Nicomachean Ethics, book 4, 2.1123b12–14). The difficulty in this assessment lies in the numerous interpretations of merit: wealth, noble birth, and/ or personal virtue. While Charlotte believes that Darcy has a right to be proud simply because of his rank and money, the crux of the novel is that gentle birth does not always entail personal nobility. At one side of the amorous discord, though Darcy is born into the upper class, his demeanor is construed by the social circle of Hertfordshire as less than noble. At the other side, Elizabeth is born to lower gentry, but her superior “understanding” (Austen 43) in mental and moral capacities distinguishes her as a true gentlewoman above both her family of meaner understanding and haughty aristocrats like Lady Catherine. The pride and prejudice of both Darcy and Elizabeth abate when Darcy is irresistibly wooed by her personal merits and when Elizabeth comes to know Darcy as “perfectly amiable” (282), always acting in principled honor. In this manner, for both of them vanity becomes humbled and pride affirmed. As discussed above, pride, as hubris, can be a negative force disrupting social bonds and affronting the gods, fellow beings, and oneself. Pride is, nonetheless, also a positive force, affirming one’s achievements and promoting self-worth and self-contentment. According to Aristotle, pride, as opposed to hubris, is grounded in virtue (NE, book 4, 3.1124b30). “[W]here there is a real superiority of mind,” Darcy claims, “pride will be always under good regulation” (43), and that is Darcy and Eliza-
84â•…â•… race beth’s path to a deep-rooted happiness rather than the mere fairy-tale assurance of “happily ever after.” See also Browning, Robert: “My Last Duchess”; Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan: Hound of the Baskervilles, The; Gaskell, Elizabeth: North and South; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: “Rappaccini’s Daughter”; Miller, Arthur: Death of a Salesman; Poe, Edgar Allan: “Murders in the Rue Morgue, The”; Roy, Arundhati: God of Small Things, The; Shakespeare, William: Henry IV, Part I; Julius Caesar; Much Ado about Nothing; Swift, Jonathan: Gulliver’s Travels; Williams, Tennessee: Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. FURTHER READING Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980. Austen, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. New York: Bantam, 1989. Lattimore, Richmond Alexander. Story Patterns in Greek Tragedy. London: Athione Press, 1964.
Unhae Langis
race
The theme of race has been and continues to be hotly debated in the modern world. Questions of whether race is a biologically determined grouping of characteristics or whether it is merely a socially constructed means of classifying and dividing people are still asked in every field imaginable, including science, legal studies, politics, and literature. Even defining the term race is a complicated and sensitive task, particularly since race has been a justification for suppressing and oppressing large groups of people across the globe and throughout history. Two main schools of thought exist regarding the definition of race, and importantly, both developed in the modern era. One belief asserts that race is a genetically determined factor that influences external and internal characteristics, such as skin color, features, and predispositions to illnesses. The other philosophy contends that race is a socially constructed characteristic, arbitrary and hurtful in its exclusionary application. Whichever school one believes, and many scholars and critics acknowledge some truth in both, the use of race as a characteristic to divide groups of people and to control or elimi-
nate them is the central problem bound up in the theme of race. The concept is instantly polarizing— whether or not one believes race is a significant biological issue, it is clear that as humans we tend to separate according to race. In some cases it is selfseparation, while in others it is forced separation. In their introduction to Theories of Race and Racism, John Solomos and Les Back suggest that while race is still a primary theme in our daily lives, it has shifted somewhat in focus all over the world. Throughout the years leading up to and including the 20th century, institutionalized racism—slavery, disenfranchisement, lynchings—was the primary way in which racism was expressed, but according to Solomos and Back, “in recent times questions about race and racism have been refashioned in ways that emphasize cultural difference” (4). This move toward seeing a larger, more globalized picture of race and racism coincided with the end of colonialism and the creation of postcolonial literary criticism. Scholars who focus on the theme of race and related issues in postcolonial studies analyze literature from the perspective of the underprivileged, the suppressed, and minority characters and people. Thus, race becomes an underlying—or, in many cases, overarching—theme in works that may not include minority characters or “colonial” locales. For example, race becomes an unsettling theme in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, as the Eastern European “other” makes his way to England and engages in a process some have called “reverse colonization,” by taking victims and making them into vampires like himself. In countries that were former colonies of imperial powers, literature addressed the issues of race that surrounded independence movements and the winning of autonomy by nations such as India, Pakistan, and the Philippines, to name just a few. In literature, race often takes on characteristics of being divisive or oppositional. Frequently, stories involving themes of race involve “clashes” or struggles between white groups and minority, or “native” groups. Rudyard Kipling coined the phrase “the white man’s burden” in his poem of the same name, in 1899. The phrase, at the time a description of the stated motivations of colonial behavior, has come to also refer to white support for minority individuals
raceâ•…â•… 85 and the “civilizing” effect it is purported to have on native peoples. In addition to postcolonial politics, race has been a recurring theme in literature, most pointedly beginning in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. An early novel to deal with the issues and effects of race was Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin, a story about slavery in the United States. While Stowe’s novel has endured its fair share of criticism and close study, the author always maintained that she wanted to engage readers’ sympathies and change their minds about slavery. Certainly, novels and other literary works that featured black characters or were written by black authors gained prominence before Stowe’s work—from the English writer Aphra Behn’s novel Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slave to the former American slave Phyllis Wheatley’s poetry, both of which were written in the 18th century. Mark Twain’s famous novel Adventures of Huckleberry Finn features an AfricanAmerican character named Jim who escapes slavery himself. From the 20th century onward, race moved to the forefront of politics, especially in the United States, where institutionalized racism was the law of the land until the late 1960s. In 1903, the AfricanAmerican writer W. E. B. DuBois suggested that the biggest problem of the 20th century would be the problem of race. As the 20th century progressed, race became a key theme for writers, especially writers of color. In 1940, the African-American author Richard Wright published Native Son, the story of Bigger Thomas, a young black man who, largely on the basis of his race, gets caught up in poverty, violence, and judicial mistreatment. All the actions Bigger takes are directly related to or motivated by race in some way. He comes into his first job because his employer wishes to help African Americans improve their lives. He accidentally smothers Mary Dalton to prevent her blind mother from noticing Bigger in Mary’s bedroom late at night. Fearful of the punishment he might receive as a black man who murdered a white woman, Bigger tries to dispose of the body in the family furnace, and his situation continues to worsen. Native Son graphically represents the deep divide between white America and black America while illustrating
how pervasive the theme of race is in our lives. For Bigger, it is inescapable in the mazes—literally and figuratively—of Chicago. Race and the divide we allow it to create are not merely an American invention, however. In Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, white missionaries arrive in Nigeria and begin to set up a new religion, law, and justice among the Umuofia clan. What results is a confusing and violent clash between cultures, with the white colonists taking power by force and manipulation in order to “civilize” the native Africans. Unlike Native Son, which portrays the youth of color as one against overwhelming forces beyond his control, Things Fall Apart is about invasion from without: An entire society crumbles in the face of the violent threat of colonialism. The race of the colonizers becomes important to the story because it is their version of law and order that ultimately controls the African village and forces the villagers to cooperate. Okonkwo is unable to reconcile the two clashing ideologies—he does not want to be punished for his crimes by white men from another continent. Thus, race becomes a basis for the threatening relationship between interloper and native. As the 20th century progressed, race pride and power became a dynamic facet in literature, building on progressive political movements around the world. In the United States in particular, the progressive movements of the 1960s and 1970s were key for a new wave of race pride. In the poetry and drama of Amiri Baraka, for example, the theme of race becomes a source of strength and power for African Americans. In Baraka’s play Dutchman, a white woman and a black man enter into a verbal sparring match over racial difference that ends with the woman’s murder of the man. Race is figured in Dutchman as an insurmountable barrier, a theme as old as time itself. While Dutchman examines race relations in the supposedly free and equal American society of the late 1960s, Athol Fugard’s play Master Harold .╯.╯. and the Boys takes apartheid-era South Africa for its setting for exploring the theme of race. The play centers on the young Master Harold, a white South African teenager who discusses life, love, literature, and history with his family’s two black
86â•…â•… regret servants, Sam and Willie. Sam and Harold have an equal footing—a long relationship that goes back to Harold’s childhood, in which Sam often stood in for Harold’s own father. The two are so familiar with one another that Sam calls Harold by the nickname “Hally.” However, the relationship sours over the course of the play, until Harold insults Sam and tells him to only address him as Master Harold from then on. The heretofore amicable relationship crumbles in the face of authority, represented by the return of Harold’s father, and the racial schism created through apartheid is reestablished—even though the characters had earlier proven it to be a false schism. Literary considerations of race continue to challenge, inform, and surprise, even as the Internet age continues to decrease the separation among people of all racial backgrounds. Race, whether as a source of pride, strength, pain, or sadness, will remain a dynamic element in literature. The debates over race as social construct versus race as biological feature may never be settled, but literary explorations can help readers understand their own place in the debate as well as others’ positions. Indeed, literature will undoubtedly provide entirely new perspectives as time goes on—perspectives that may change everything we understand about race today. See also Angelou, Maya: I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings; Chestnutt, Charles W.: “Goophered Grapevine, The”; Coetzee, J. M.: Waiting for the Barbarians; Conrad, Joseph: Heart of Darkness; Douglass, Frederick: Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave; DuBois: W. E. B.: Souls of Black Folk, The; Ellison, Ralph: Invisible Man; Faulkner, William: Light in August; Gaines, Ernest J.: Lesson Before D ying, A; Gordimer, Nadine: Burger’s Daughter; Hansberry, Lorraine: Raisin in the Sun, A; Hughes, Langston: poems; Jacobs, Harriet: Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself; Jefferson, Thomas: Notes on the State of Virginia; Kingston, Maxine Hong: Tripmaster Monkey: His Fake Book; Lee, Harper: To Kill a Mockingbird; Melville, Herman: Moby-Dick; Morrison, Toni: Bluest Eye, The; Song of Solomon; Sula; Tar Baby; Marshall, Paule: Brown Girl,
Brownstones; Paton, Alan: Cry, the Beloved Country; Shakespeare, William: Merchant of Venice, The; Othello; Tempest, The; Toomer, Jean: Cane; Wright, Richard: Black Boy. FURTHER READING Carby, Hazel. Race Men. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998. Hooks, Bell. Killing Rage: Ending Racism. New York: H. Holt and Co., 1995. Kipling, Rudyard. “The White Man’s Burden.” McClure’s Magazine 12 (February 1899). Solomos, John, and Les Black, eds. Theories of Race and Racism. New York: Routledge, 2000.
Sharyn Emery
regret
“I have no regrets.” Surely we have all heard this announcement made at one time or another, however implausible it might be. We may have even made it ourselves. Living a life with no regrets, however, seems impossible. Since regret is a feeling generated by looking back on our mistakes, omissions, lost opportunities, and bad behavior, and since one may feel regret over something as trivial as the purchase of a sweater, the person with no regrets is either flawless in every regard or has no conscience. Regret is a complicated emotion capable of leading to various consequences, both good and bad. Sometimes it can make us grow by helping us learn from our mistakes. For instance, in John Knowles’s A Separate Peace, Gene’s lifelong regret at having hurt his friend plagues him, keeping him from living his life freely. When the truth finally comes to the surface, Gene takes responsibility. Thus, when Finny tragically dies in surgery, Gene is at peace, knowing he did the right thing by being honest. On the other hand, regret can lead us to paralysis, when we are consumed by it, but can do nothing to rectify the past. In William Shakespeare’s King Lear, Lear regrets his ill-treatment of Cordelia, his only truly loyal child. However, he cannot reverse the events his bad decisions set in motion, and madness destroys him in the end. While there is some disagreement over the nature of “true regret,” most psychologists and philosophers agree that, first and foremost, it is
regretâ•…â•… 87 cognitive. That is, to feel regret requires that we think about what we have done (or failed to do). Regret, by its very nature, requires us to assess the past and our role in it. It is associated with what psychologists call “counterfactual” thought, or thinking about “what might have been” (Landman 37). This counterfactual thinking connects regret with the intellectual process of decision making, setting it apart from other emotions such as sadness, happiness, and love: These may all be safely rooted in the present and require only that we “feel” what is right in front of us. Pure emotions generally stem from a less cognitive impulse. Whether or not regret is an emotion at all is a source of disagreement among scholars. However, the psychologist Janet Landman argues persuasively that because regret is well known to have physiological effects (some refer to feelings of regret as a sharp “pang”) and because it entails making judgments about oneself, it undoubtedly qualifies as an emotion (37). Thomas Gilovich and Victoria Husted Medved echo Landman by calling regret a “cognitively determined emotion” (379). Regret is easily confused with other emotions and patterns of thinking, such as remorse and guilt. In general, scholars agree that these terms are related but different. Remorse is typically used when referring only to one’s own past acts or failures to act, and only when these acts were within one’s control. Regret is broader and refers to those types of situations, but also to situations over which we have no control, such as the passing of summer (Landman 52). In addition, we may feel regret for events or policies in which we personally were not involved, such as the segregationist Jim Crow laws that lasted in the United States from 1876 to 1965. Guilt, too, is closely associated with, although not identical to, regret. Guilt, like remorse, comes from thoughts and feelings resulting from one’s own actions. While there is a popular notion of “collective guilt” over tragic events such as the Holocaust or slavery, the philosopher Hannah Arendt has argued that collective guilt simply justifies the evil done: if everyone is guilty, then no one is (Landman 55). In addition, it is difficult to imagine guilt without regret. In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Macbeth feels horrible guilt over his murder of Duncan; that he feels regret as well seems obvious. The opposite,
regret without guilt, is not so difficult to imagine. One may regret having turned down an opportunity to lunch with friends, but such a regret seems unlikely to produce guilt. Regret, then, is complicated. It has the qualities both of a cognitive process and an emotion. It can be felt for actions and events both within one’s control and beyond it, as well as over decisions ranging from quite serious to hopelessly trivial. The characters in Jane Austen’s novels and their varying degrees of regret help to illustrate this complicated theme. Emma Woodhouse, for instance, the title character of Emma, is a creature full of regrets. She regrets that her dear governess, Mrs. Weston, has married and so no longer lives with Emma, although she is very happy for Mrs. Weston. She regrets her friend Harriet Smith’s poor station in life, a station that has destined her to depend on the kindness of others and to marry someone no more important than a farmer, a state of affairs over which she has no control. She most deeply regrets her unkind treatment of Miss Bates, and for this she feels true remorse. Regret, for Emma, helps her to become a better person. It helps her understand her own actions and her role in society (of course, Mr. Knightley helps her come to that understanding) and thus to mature and grow. Emma’s case shows us that while regret is painful and often forces us to admit failure, it can be a constructive force in our lives. It requires us to reflect, to imagine how things might have gone differently, so that we do not repeat our mistakes in the future—or at least we hope so. As it can come both from wishing we had acted and wishing we had not, it helps us make life changes and identify silver linings, a process that can be a very positive force (Gilovich and Medved 379). Regret also helps others see us as moral people, capable of contributing positively to society. When F. W. de Klerk, president of South Africa from 1989 to 1994, issued an official apology from the National Party for the system of apartheid that had held sway in his country for decades, he said, “Apartheid caused misery and deprived people of their rights” (quoted in Lazare 105). He did not attempt to justify the policy or to mitigate the pain it caused. This regret, publicly acknowledged, along with the South African Truth and Reconciliation
88â•…â•… rejection Commission, helped to partially heal the country’s deep wounds and allow citizens to move forward together. In Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations, Pip regrets much. He regrets that which is beyond his control: his parents’ death, his difficult upbringing, his meeting Magwitch in the cemetery. This type of regret does nothing good for him; it makes him bitter, greedy, and distrustful of others. But more important, he feels regret for things that were of his own doing. He regrets abandoning Joe and Biddy; he regrets the way he acted after receiving the money from his mysterious benefactor; and most of all, he regrets the way he treated Magwitch upon the convict’s return from Australia. Pip learns from this regret, however; he reforms his ways and ends the novel treating Magwitch as only a son would. Even more important, the novel ends with hope, as Pip has developed a stronger moral compass than before and will undoubtedly make better decisions in the future. In general, Pip’s sense of regret helps him to grow. For many, however, regret is a destructive, paralyzing force to be avoided at all costs. Harry Truman, the 33rd president of the United States, said, “Never, never waste a minute on regret. It’s a waste of time” (quoted in Landman 9). Regret can keep us from looking forward and experiencing life to the fullest extent. It can also play a destructive role in decision making. As we are apt to worry about what effect the decisions we make now will have on us later, fear of future regret may keep us from acting as we know we should. Such is the case for both Clarissa Dalloway and Peter Walsh in Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway. As a girl, Clarissa loved both Peter and her free, wild friend Sally. Fear of bucking convention made her seek stability over lasting attachments with them. She regrets those decisions now but attempts to live her life as though she has no regrets. The result is that she is a person who moves through life without feeling much of anything. Avoiding the pain of regret is so paramount that she must block out all other feelings as well. Peter, on the other hand, feels the pain too much. After many years, his regrets over his failed relationship with Clarissa still sting as though it happened yesterday. This pain prevents Peter from
truly moving on in life; his obsession with what might have been has paralyzed him. Despite our admonitions to the contrary, few of us could truly live a life without regret. Indeed, since regret can function as a catalyst toward change, redemption, and reform, it would be unwise for human beings to avoid this emotion entirely. Healthy regret—that is, regret that does not consume us but allows us to move forward—is undoubtedly an integral part of life’s journey. See also Alexie, Sherman: Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistf ight in Heaven, The; Eliot, T. S.: “Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, The”; Ishiguro, Kazuo: Remains of the Day, The; Morrison, Toni: Song of Solomon; Tan, Amy: Joy Luck Club, The; Tolstoy, Leo: War and Peace; Williams, Tennessee: Streetcar Named Desire, A. FURTHER READING Gilovich, Thomas, and Victoria Husted Medved. “The Experience of Regret: What, When, and Why.” Psychological Review 2, no. 2 (1995): 379–395. Landman, Janet. Regret. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. Lazare, Aaron. On Apology. London: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
rejection
In Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations, Miss Havisham is rejected by her would-be groom before the novel’s action begins. For many years, she has sequestered herself in her mansion, surrounded by the aging relics of her doomed wedding ceremony. More important, though, is the effect this ancient rejection has had on Miss Havisham. She is bitter, to be sure, but the bitterness goes so far and runs so deep that she is eager to raise her ward, Estella, to exact a kind of revenge for her by hurting others, specifically men. Great Expectations is somewhat of a treatise of the effects of rejection on the human psyche. In addition to Miss Havisham, Pip, Joe, Biddy, and Magwitch all experience this deep pain. Pip is rejected by his sister and Estella, Joe, and Biddy by Pip, and Magwitch by his country. For these and other literary characters, rejection creates a void that is difficult to fill and that is capable of
rejectionâ•…â•… 89 distorting their personalities forever. This theme is powerful because of these far-reaching consequences. Rejection is a powerful force in works from a myriad of time periods and genres, including the Bible, John Milton’s Paradise Lost, Daniel Defoe’s Moll Flanders, Jane Austen’s P ride and P rejudice, Richard Wright’s Native Son, William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury, and Amy Tan’s The Joy Luck Club. Social scientists have shown time and again that human beings need social connections. According to the psychologist Mark Leary, this need is an adaptation that evolved because it promoted survival and reproduction (3). In the early days of the human race, we needed each other with an intensity that industrialism and technology have taken away. Humans lived in small groups, far away from other groups. In order for our species to reproduce, we had to choose from the mates who were available. In addition, because we do not have the natural defenses possessed by other animals (such as claws, antlers, and sharp, powerful teeth), we had to work together to defend ourselves. This evolutionary adaptation has stayed with us. Research demonstrates that we still need human contact in order to thrive, with some studies even showing that social isolation can do damage to the immune system, threaten cardiovascular health, and even hasten death (Fiske and Yamamoto 185). Because this contact is a good thing, and because we are drawn to make connections, when a specific connection is refused, as is the case in acts of rejection, the result can devastate us. Those who are rejected feel worthless, have pronounced feelings of inferiority and inadequacy, and move through life never showing their “real selves” (Evoy 54, 57). In other words, rejection, to the human animal, does not make sense, and our bodies and minds do not know how to handle it. Knowing this about rejection helps to explain why it is such a powerful theme in literature and culture. Several stories in the Bible explore rejection in depth, and because the Bible is a foundational text of Western culture, these stories help to establish the larger context in which the concept of rejection may be considered. The story of Ishmael and his mother, Hagar, is a good example. Abraham and Sarah were,
for many years, unable to conceive children. Sarah presented her maid, Hagar, to Abraham in the hope that she could produce a son for him. The plan worked, and Hagar gave birth to Ishmael. However, God declared to Abraham that he and Sarah, despite their advanced age, would have a son as well. Isaac, son of Sarah and Abraham, soon followed. Ishmael and Hagar were eventually sent out into the desert, rejected by Abraham. This story is significant for many reasons, perhaps the most important of which is that Isaac is considered a patriarch of the Jewish religion, and Ishmael is considered the progenitor of Arabic peoples. Certainly the centuries-long conflict between these two groups is not caused by the biblical story, but the story does provide a foundation by which we may understand the lasting power of rejection. The rejected feel like outcasts, and in many cases they are literally outcasts, driven from others, just as Ishmael and Hagar were. The Bible is not the only early document that deals with rejection. Monica Melancthon explains that the motif, manifesting itself as a rejection by God or other divine beings, is found in other Semitic languages of the time. The lamentation, a vocalizing of the pain of rejection, is a commonly found form in ancient Semitic literature. For instance, in The Curse of Agade, composed around 2000 b.c., a rebellious act by King Naram-Sim kindles the fury of the deity and leads to the destruction of the city. Similarly, in Lamentations 3, the city of Jerusalem, the “nerve center of religious activity” in 587 b.c., lies in ruins. Lamentations 3 reads, in part, “He has driven me away and made me walk / in darkness rather than in light; indeed, he has turned his hand against me / again and again, all day long” (3:2–4). Its people, rejected by their God, are devastated. As Melancthon notes, this destruction showed their status as God’s chosen people and Jerusalem’s status as God’s chosen city were in question. They associated this perceived rejection with human guilt and disobedience. In other words, they felt they must have done something wrong to deserve God’s wrath. Much like the early citizens of Jerusalem, children who have been rejected by their parents often internalize feelings of guilt and wrongdoing. Parental rejection is so powerful, research shows, that its victims never completely get over it; it remains with
90â•…â•… rejection them in some form for life. These children, denied the love of one or both parents, carry “feelings of emptiness where that love should have been—often for the rest of their lives. The rejected live with an emotional hole in the center of their being” (Evoy 72). They experience guilt, depression, anger, hostility, and aggression, and they actively seek out, sometimes in dangerous ways, situations in which they are valued (66). In Louise Erdrich’s Love Medicine, for instance, June Morrisey is rejected by her mother as a young child. As she grows into a woman, she exhibits many of the signs listed above. She tries to hang herself during a game with her cousins, convinced she has no real worth. She cannot truly accept the genuine love Marie gives her, fearful as she is of yet another rejection. June lives her entire life aggressively and angrily hurting others, and she frequently puts herself in precarious situations, one of which ultimately kills her. In Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Huck is rejected by his father and then again by the society at large. While he is a resilient, confident child, he believes himself to be, quite naturally, worth less than other children. He seems to be most comfortable when he is alone and acting independently. While this may be part of his perceived charm (and also why he is seen as so incorrigible by the townspeople), Twain’s characterization here highlights Huck’s state of rejection. Children should not seek to be independent; they should not have to. Childhood is naturally a state in which we should seek the help and guidance of our elders. When we are shown, as Huck was, that the help and guidance is either not forthcoming or will lead to more pain, we learn to stop asking for it. For Huck, rejection made him (rightly) suspicious of society at large. He simply did not trust people, even those who claimed to want to help him. A pattern of rejection can force victims into irrational states, where they see and feel rejected from all angles. Mark Leary points out that feelings of rejection can become so pervasive that even “slights or inconsiderate behavior” can be taking as wholesale rejection, further driving the rejected person away from society at large. In Native Son, we see this in Bigger Thomas. Society has rejected him because he is black; that is his reality. However, his mother
is angry with him because of what she sees as his laziness and lack of ambition. Bigger simply adds this to the mountain of rejection he already feels. In addition, when Mary and her boyfriend are kind to him, he does not know how to take that behavior. Rejection has inured him to real feelings. He, like many of the rejected, must close his “real self ” off. Of all the varieties of rejection, romantic rejection, such as the type felt by Miss Havisham, provides perhaps the most immediate, crushing blow. Romantic rejections are difficult to weather because if we are hard-wired to create connections, the connections we seek with potential mates are the most important connections of all. Being rejected on those occasions makes the least sense to us biologically. Indeed, when Marianne is rejected by Willoughby in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility, her devastation sends her into a physical illness that almost kills her. Marianne’s whole sense of self and sense of purpose are shaken. Even though Willoughby is revealed to be a cad, Marianne’s grief is not generated by his obvious mistreatment of her, but rather by the loss of what she thought was a perfect love. As much as she later learns about him, she cannot bring herself to truly blame him. Being rejected by others is an experience that can change human beings at their core. It can call into questions what we think we know about our own intelligence, beauty, personality, and overall worth. Rejection can absolutely devastate us, causing us to hide our real selves and operate as mere shells of human beings. Because these experiences are so powerful, it is no wonder literature explores the subject again and again. See also Kureishi, Hanif: Buddha of Suburbia, The; Shakespeare, William: Twelfth Night. FURTHER READING Evoy, John Joseph. The Rejected. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1981. Fiske, Susan T., and Mariko Yamamoto. “Coping with Rejection.” In Interpersonal Rejection, edited by Mark Leary, 185–198. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Holy Bible. New International Version. New York: Biblica, 1967.
religionâ•…â•… 91 Leary, Mark, ed. Interpersonal Rejection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Melancthon, Monica J. Rejected by God: The History and Significance of the Rejection Motif in the Hebrew Bible. New York: Peter Lang, 2001.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
religion
Religion and literature are inextricably intertwined. Many of the world’s major religious texts, such as the Bible, the Quran, and the Bhagavad Gita, are studied not just for their philosophical and spiritual truths but for their literary aesthetics as well. Both religion and literature spring from a common impulse to explore and explain the fundamental mystery of human existence—of humankind’s place in the world and our relationship to the created universe, to the Divine, and to our fellow human beings. Religion, like literature, mirrors the ruling cultural paradigms of the day while also taking issue with them, interrogating and interpreting social and cultural mores and offering compelling new visions of being in the world. They offer both comfort to the troubled and the joys of quiet repose, and they are intimately personal and reassuringly or troublingly (as the case may be) public at the same time. Not surprisingly, religion is not only a key theme in literature but has functioned as the very fountainhead of much literature from antiquity to the present time. The ancient epics of the world, from Homer’s The Iliad and The Odyssey to the Mahabharata and the Ramayana from the Indian subcontinent, give us a revealing glimpse into the cultural makeup of their peoples. They also feature an elaborate parallel universe of gods and goddesses who are intimately involved in the world of mortals and, indeed, mirror some of the same vanities and foibles of the human world. For example, Athena is Odysseus’s patron deity and assists his return home, helping him to, among other things, fight the houseful of suitors who are pursuing his wife Penelope and living the good life at his expense. Similarly, Krishna, an important deity in the Hindu pantheon of gods, helps the righteous Pandavas defeat their cousins, the immoral Kauravas, and regain their kingdom. In Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, Antigone risks Creon’s wrath and becomes a
tragic heroine by virtue of her determination to perform her brother Polynices’ burial rites. She acts not just out of filial duty but also because proper burial rites for the dead, whether they are foe or friend, are demanded by the gods. In more modern times, John Milton set out to accomplish the ambitious task of writing a contemporary epic for England in the 17th century by choosing to write a Christian depiction “of man’s disobedience of God” and the expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise. The Bible is the inspiration for his great epic, Paradise Lost, and biblical themes of good, evil, the nature of sin, and the power of redemption with true repentance that is available through religion stem from the core of this text. Similarly, Christopher Marlowe’s play Doctor Faustus, based on the Faust legend, explores the pitfalls of the arrogance of knowledge as Faustus signs away his soul to the devil in exchange for the fleeting pleasures of necromancy and magic for a brief 24 years. The play is notable in the way it explores Faustus’s battle with his conscience (imagined as his good and bad angels), and then sketches in moving detail the plight he faces with the prospect of eternal damnation. But more profound is its depiction of Mephistopheles, one of Satan’s chief emissaries, sent to interact with Faustus. The very origins of British drama can be located in religion in the shape of the medieval miracles and morality plays that featured stories from the Bible and were concerned with moral education. In fact, scholars have traced the origins of fool characters common in Shakespeare back to the portrayal of Satan as a bawdy and buffoonish character in the Morality plays. In the West, religion has been the inspiration for much of its most acclaimed art and architecture, as well as its literature. The work of Raphael, Michelangelo, and Leonardo Da Vinci, to name a few of the most acclaimed painters of Renaissance Europe, as well as the most exquisite churches and cathedrals in Europe, owe their origin to the religious impulse. In addition, the church has always been a major patron of the arts, commissioning some of the most profoundly important works, whether they be painting, religious manuscripts/treatises, or the buildings of western civilization. In the Dark Ages in medieval
92â•…â•… religion Europe, it was the monks who preserved some of the most valuable books of ancient Greece and Rome by diligently copying them on vellum by hand before the advent of the printing press. Dante Alighieri’s The Divine Comedy, and Saint Augustine’s Confessions and The City of God are all intensely religious in content. While Dante presents a complicated three-tier system of the Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso, an imaginative and allegorical imagining of the afterlife, Augustine’s autobiographical text presents a compelling view of the journey to religion and selfhood. Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales, written in the 14th century, is structured around the tales told by a group of 23 pilgrims on a pilgrimage from London to the shrine of Saint Thomas Becket in Canterbury. Although Chaucer presents a fairly wide cross section of medieval English society from the noble Knight to the humble Yeoman, a majority of the pilgrims, such as the Monk, the Pardoner, the Friar, the Prioress, and the Summoner, among others, belong to the Christian orders. These characters are some of the most interesting in The Canterbury Tales, and Chaucer satirizes corruption among the church’s functionaries through them. Some of the most emotionally resonant wrestling with questions of faith can be found in the metaphysical poetry of 17th-century poets such as John Donne, Andrew Marvell, and George Herbert, in appeals such as Donne’s “Batter my heart, three personed God” or in Herbert’s poems “The Affliction” and “The Collar.” In 19th-century Victorian literature, the question of faith and doubt that afflicted people after Charles Darwin’s publication of On the Origin of Species, which declared that man is not made in the image of God but is descended from apes, is a recurring theme. In different ways, Matthew Arnold’s “Dover Beach,” Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s In Memoriam, A. H. H., Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the d ’Urbervilles, all express the painful incomprehension and angst of a world suddenly deprived of the certitudes of religion expressed so well in Robert Browning’s “Pippa’s Song”: “God’s in His Heaven— / All’s right with the world” (ll. 7–8). Religion may seem to have been in slow retreat because of the onslaughts of industrialism, the coming of the railroads, the depopulation of the coun-
tryside, the findings of the geologist Charles Lyell and the psychiatrists Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung, and Karl Marx’s declaration that “religion is the opiate of the masses,” but it nevertheless has continued to preoccupy writers, whether they be poets, novelists, or dramatists. T. S. Eliot’s modernist masterpiece The Wasteland articulates a deep sense of the loneliness and alienation experienced by people lost in the facelessness of the modern metropolis, but it also closes with a heartfelt prayer of “Shantih, Shantih, Shantih,” invoking the ancient mantra of peace from Hindu religious traditions. In his later work “Burnt Norton,” and particularly in his poetic dramas, Eliot turned to religion in his quest for answers to the modern malaise of isolationism and loss of faith. Murder in the Cathedral, his best-known play, centers on the martyrdom of Saint Thomas Becket and explores with insightful nuances the nature of temptation for one even so deeply steeped in Christ as Becket, the archbishop of Canterbury. Even the desire to martyrdom, as long as it springs from an earthly desire to garner spiritual capital, can be corrupt and compromised. Becket’s union with God can only come once he transcends this greed for spiritual acclaim and annihilates all egotism. Beyond spiritual and ethical explorations, literature also portrays religion as a great source of discord and dissension in the world and thus critiques the violence and fanaticism that results from a narrow-minded adherence to creed. Much of Salman Rushdie’s work, for instance, refers to the violence arising from the conflicts between the Hindu and Muslim communities in India, such as his Midnight ’s Children. But the power of religion to inflame passions is most aptly demonstrated through the controversy surrounding the publication of his The Satanic Verses in 1988. The Satanic Verses is a part-fantasy, part-realist novel in which Rushdie presents a fictionalized story related to some apocryphal verses from the Quran, and consequently makes references to the life of Muhammad, the Prophet. The creative liberties taken by the text upset some sections of the Islamic community, which widely condemned it, and Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa, or religious decree, condemning Rushdie as an infidel. Rushdie went into hiding in fear following much violence involving the publication of this
responsibilityâ•…â•… 93 book around the world, and he suffered threats to his life. Countries such as Pakistan and India with large Muslim populations banned the book in the interest of public safety. Religion is a powerful source of both succor and conflict, emerging from the wellsprings of our most deeply human impulses and arousing our most passionate responses. It becomes a lens through which issues of race, ethnicity, and identity are parsed. Literature, in its extraordinary power to mirror and mediate these passions and conflicts, finds both its source and its substance in religion, in the shape of themes, images, symbols, and the very language it uses to appeal to us. See also Anonymous: Beowulf; Bunyan, John: Pilgrim’s Progress, The; Crane, Stephen: Red Badge of Courage, The; Defoe, Daniel: Robinson Crusoe; Emerson, Ralph Waldo: “Divinity School Address, The”; Faulkner, William: Light in August; Greene, Graham: Heart of the Matter, The; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: Scarlet Letter, The; Young Goodman Brown; Hemingway, Ernest: Farewell to Arms, A; Jefferson, Thomas: Notes on the States of Virginia; Joyce, James: D ubliners; Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, A; Lawrence, Jerome, and Robert E. Lee: Inherit the Wind; Melville, Herman: “Bartleby the Scrivener”; Moby-Dick; Molière: Tartuffe; O’Connor, Flannery: “Good Man Is Hard to Find, A”; Wise Blood; Potok, Chaim: Chosen, The; Rowlandson, Mary: Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mary Rowlandson; Steinbeck, John: Grapes of Wrath, The; Stowe, Harriet Beecher: Uncle Tom’s Cabin; Twain, Mark: Adventures of Huckleberry Finn; Winterson, Jeanette: Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit; Wright, Richard: Black Boy. FURTHER READING Detweiler, Robert, and David Jasper, eds. Religion and Literature: A Reader. Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press, 2000. Frye Northrup. The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982. Jasper, David. Images of Belief in Literature. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1984.
Rajender Kaur
responsibility
The word responsibility has two connotations in modern English. We can be responsible for something, which means we are accountable and we will take the blame or reward should there be any. This connotation can apply to a person, as in the way that parents are responsible for their children or coaches are responsible for their players, or it can apply to a thing, as in the way someone might take responsibility for a car accident or an accounting mistake. We can also be responsible to people or organizations. This connotation implies that we “report” to someone, or more accurately that we must “respond” (the root of responsibility) to them. The parent who is responsible for her children, in that she will take responsibility should they break a neighbor’s window or skip school, is at the same time responsible to her children in that she must account for the decisions she makes that affect their lives, such as distinguishing right from wrong and providing a stable home life. These two connotations work well together in that they both derive from the same idea. As noted above, the root of responsibility is “reponse.” To “respond” is an action. In life, being “responsible for” or being “responsible to” both require responding to situations—in other words, acting in the best interests of those in our sphere, including ourselves. However, there are no clear-cut answers to questions regarding just what those best interests are and just how far we are required to widen that sphere. It is only in the 20th century and beyond that these questions about responsibility have become so difficult. Prior to this period, the emphasis was always soundly on being responsible to, and responsibility was not thought of as being particularly virtuous (Moran 35). Being responsible to people, or things, or God, simply meant that these were the entities to whom you would be held accountable. This simpler interpretation of the word may have made it easier for a society to know how to be accountable and what the implications of that were. But as the shift occurred in the 20th century toward responsibility for, and its accompanying blame and punishment, these questions became more complicated. For example, in Gilead, the dystopian society Margaret Atwood depicts in The Handmaid ’s Tale, the concept of responsibility has
94â•…â•… responsibility become grossly distorted. First, the ruling powers hold humanity (women in particular) responsible for the decline in fertility that has led to the population collapse. They then take all responsibility away from the Maids, making them of the men but having no relationships with them. No one is actually responsible to or for anyone, other than the state, which apparently takes no responsibility for its people, as evidenced by the killings in the stadium and the presence of the forbidden “clubs” to which the Commander takes Offred. It is an experiment that is doomed to fail because humans have no accountability to each other, they are only forced to take accountability for things that may or may not be their fault. As in Gilead, the characters in Herman Melville’s Billy Budd, Sailor focus on blame, rather than on being responsible to one another, and Billy dies because of it. Captain Vere and the others should take responsibility for Billy both before and after the incident with Claggart, instead of simply forcing all the responsibility on him, as they do by revering the law over what they know to be the truth. The idea of being responsible to someone is analogous to having an obligation. Originally, obligation meant “something owed,” and a similar word, duty, meant a “debt.” Richard Swinburne, in Responsibility and Atonement, describes our responsibilities in life as obligations: “By our words and actions we undertake to do certain things” (20). If we become parents, we undertake the obligation of taking care of our children and teaching them right from wrong. We make other such obligations in our roles as members of communities and in our jobs. For instance, in Willa Cather’s O Pioneers!, Alexandra believes she is obligated to care for the family, especially Emil, as well as for the land on which the farm sits. It is her sense of responsibility that causes her father to choose her, rather than her brothers, to carry on his legacy. In William Shakespeare’s Henry V, King Henry is obligated to carry on the cause of his father, King Henry IV, and improve England’s fortunes on the world stage. He also feels a heavy sense of responsibility to the crown itself and, by extension, to the people of England. Thus, he turns his back on Falstaff, the mentor of his
reckless (and irresponsible) youth, and has Bardolph hung for stealing. He also feels a responsibility for the men who are killed by the French, as they were there in England’s—and thus his—service. King Henry feels responsible for his men in the same way a parent feels about his children. But unlike Henry, nonroyal parents are expected to take as much responsibility when their children err as when they do well. It is here and in other situations where there is blame to be assigned that the more common modern usage of responsibility looms large. Peter French, in Responsibility Matters, notes that we “spend a lot of time trying to avoid responsibility.” He also notes that this is as true for positives as it is for negatives, leading to the conclusion that responsibility is a burden in any situation (18). Perhaps, French argues, this is because we do not want the worry that comes along with membership in a morally responsible community. French says that we seek to obscure accountability, even when the consequence would be praise, not blame, because it signifies a loss of innocence merely to acknowledge that someone—anyone—is responsible. He says, “The practice of holding people responsible for things that happen, hence the concept of responsibility itself, depends for its sense on the purposes or ends to which we put it” (19). In other words, if there are no consequences, there is no point in assigning responsibility. And to be truly responsible, we must also be consistent, a burden in and of itself. Albert Jonsen, in Responsibility in Modern Religious Ethics, says “The responsible man is not merely the one who is able to perform good actions; he is, in fact, the good man. His goodness consists precisely in his responsibility” (5). In Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis, Gregor Samsa is heavily burdened by the responsibility placed on him by his family. He accepts that responsibility, however, and goes to work every day to a job that he loathes. Gregor, unlike the rest of his family, who sit home, irresponsibly allowing Gregor to support them, cannot pretend innocence of the world and its workings. However, when one day he wakes up as a giant cockroach, he is gradually freed of this burden. He cannot work in this condition, so the responsibility is lifted from him. As his family slowly takes on the burdens of taking care of Gregor
science and technologyâ•…â•… 95 and supporting themselves, they grow more and more resentful, with Gregor’s father even resorting to violence. Gregor’s death sets them all free, and the family ends the story with thoughts of finding sister Grete a husband, who presumably will take responsibility for them all. Unlike Gregor, Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has lived a life of bliss and privilege. Sadly, he uses this privilege irresponsibly and becomes obsessed with creating life. The creature he creates kills everyone whom Victor loves, and when he comes to the realization that it is he, not the creature, who is truly responsible for their deaths, the pain is almost too much for him to bear. It is only at this point in the novel that Victor actually takes on the mantle of responsibility and hunts the creature until his death. Additionally, in his faithful telling of the story to Walton, Victor passes on his cautionary tale, another act that demonstrates his newfound accountability. Although Frankenstein was written in the 19th century, its themes regarding the responsible use of science and technology echo loudly here in the 21st century. Some philosophers have argued that in the contemporary era, everything has become our responsibility—nature, war, death, global poverty. As the range of human action is much broader than it ever was before—that is, what we can do is greater and more fantastic than what could have been imagined in the past—our responsibilities have widened to an almost limitless point. While the need to do the right thing by those to whom we are responsible has not changed, what that right thing might be has grown more confusing, and the number of those to whom we might be held responsible has increased exponentially. See also Davies, Robertson: Fifth Business; Dinesen, Isak: Out of Africa; James, Henry: Daisy Miller; Machiavelli, Niccolò: P rince, The; Shakespeare, William: King Lear; Virgil: Aeneid, The; Vonnegut, Kurt: Cat ’s Cradle; Thoreau, Henry David: “Resistance to Civil Government”; Wilder, Thornton: Our Town; Williams, Tennessee: Glass Menagerie, The. FURTHER READING French, Peter A. Responsibility Matters. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1992.
Jonsen, Albert R. Responsibility in Modern Religious Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Corpus Books, 1968. Swinburne, Richard. Responsibility and Atonement. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. Moran, Gabriel. A Grammar of Responsibility. New York: Crossroad, 1996.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
science and technology
While science and technology play key roles in human affairs, they tend to recede into the background of daily life. We seldom think about the structures and practices of scientific institutions or about the social and environmental costs of our technologically textured lives. But as canonical literature from medieval times to the present makes abundantly clear, cultural responses to and attitudes about scientific developments and engineering breakthroughs have always been potent, complex, and multiple. Literary works by authors from Geoffrey Chaucer to Don DeLillo have variously reflected, reinforced, and (in some cases) destabilized these larger societal responses and attitudes. Studying this literature, therefore, occasions valuable opportunities to better understand the taken-for-granted background of science and technology. Many literary texts foreground the complex relations between science, technology, and society by calling attention to fundamental problems of definition and recognition. The term science, for instance, poses considerable problems precisely because of its privileged status in mainstream culture. We associate it with “reality,” “truth,” and “reason,” and when individuals or institutions speak on behalf of science, lay audiences often assume that what is being conveyed is factual, trustworthy, and authoritative. Unfortunately, distinguishing between “genuine” and “mock” science is no easy matter; scores of unscientific practices and products announce themselves as thoroughly scientific simply to gain acceptance or to influence consumers. Even in early modern times, when science referred generally to any systematic acquisition of knowledge, differentiating between real and fake science could be tricky. Geoffrey Chaucer dramatizes this problem in “The Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale” of The Canterbury Tales by critiquing mutually reinforcing entities within medieval
96â•…â•… science and technology society: devious alchemists, armed with a bewildering scientific vocabulary and an arsenal of laboratory technologies, who promise to transform base metals into gold; and greedy clients whose materialistic desires perpetuate the existence of charlatan science. In so doing, this satiric tale foregrounds fundamental problems of “validity” and “misrecognition” that arise any time science is invoked. Significantly, Chaucer links these problems to cultural ideas about technology. Prior to the 19th century, this term could refer broadly either to material instruments or to any systematic technique. Chaucer’s text suggests that any technology—whether instrumental or methodological—should be understood as an extension of the culture that produces and employs it. The early laboratory implements of this tale—fire, crucibles, chemical elements—are not value-neutral: They establish and confer authority, and their use and abuse reflect and shape particular human interests and cultural values. In the 17th and 18th centuries, the term science gradually lost cultural and professional currency and gave way to natural science, a phrase denoting only those enterprises that advanced our understanding of the physical world. The circulation of this phrase was largely an attempt to distinguish “real science” from other forms of systematic inquiry (philosophy, history, theology, and so on) whose methods did not require observation, experimentation, and replication. Because this new emphasis on discovering nature’s secrets called into question long-standing theological explanations of the universe, many writers explored the ethical and philosophical implications of natural science’s goals. Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus, for example, takes place in a theocentric universe, but it registers profound anxiety about scientific ambitions. Inquiries into the laws of nature, the play suggests, can give way to scientific hubris, to an immoral aspiration to attain godlike wisdom. For the play’s protagonist, seeking such knowledge comes at the expense of his moral decency. Thus, when Faustus bargains away his soul for ultimate knowledge, he sinks deeper and deeper into despair until his final dismemberment by the devil’s brutal agents. Of course, many other writers saw promise, nor corruption, in the natural sciences. Francis
Bacon’s The New Atlantis (1627) conjures a mythical island replete with a compassionate citizenry and an expansive scientific institute aimed at studying physical laws and taming an inhospitable natural world. Still, while proponents of Bacon’s ambitious scientific vision increased in number, many writers in the 18th century would nevertheless continue to examine the consequences of imperialistic science. Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels, for instance, depicts astronomers as a dark embodiment of humankind’s growing preoccupation with the physical world, suggesting, as Marlowe did, that such concerns come at the expense of moral and spiritual growth. Most 19th-century literary texts concerned with science and technology are probably best understood as responses to the so-called Age of Enlightenment of the previous century. Philosophical and scientific thinkers of the Enlightenment generally asserted that reason and science provided the means of overcoming superstition, controlling nature, and achieving social and political progress. Against such assertions stands Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, whose scientist embodies the Enlightenment faith that all laws of the physical universe can be known. While this novel condemns detached intellectualism, it also raises serious questions about the motives and consequences of scientific work. Lured less by “knowledge for its own sake” than by the promise of power that knowledge confers, Victor Frankenstein signifies the negative potential of science. He functions as a nightmarish counterexample to the idealized image of the Enlightenment scientist dedicated to cool, dispassionate observation and truth seeking. Victor’s success in animating an assemblage of dead body parts is undone by his subsequent inability to ease the torment endured by his monstrous creation; their entwined lives serve as a dramatic argument for responsible science that properly accounts for the social costs of so-called breakthroughs. Similar critiques of Enlightenment values can be found in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s fiction. In “The Birth-mark,” a chemist’s clinical obsession with his wife’s birthmark threatens her well-being and eventually leads to her death. Similarly, “Rappaccini’s Daughter” features an inhumane scientist whose isolated horticultural experiments leave him
science and technologyâ•…â•… 97 emaciated, sallow, and sickly looking. His work also transforms his daughter, who develops immunity to the poisonous flowers he cultivates but renders her toxic to anything or anyone in proximity of her breath. Collectively, these texts argue for a mode of science that critiques and limits its own ambitions and takes into account the social costs of scientific work once it leaves the laboratory. These literary arguments, however, did little to curtail the degree to which science and technology propelled larger processes of urbanization and industrialization. Many late 19th-century literary texts responded to this nagging realization by juxtaposing pastoral and industrial imagery. Huck’s desire to embark on a journey into unspoiled territory, near the end of Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, for instance, might reflect a growing ambivalence about the purported civilizing effects of an increasingly urbanized world. And in Twain’s A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, the protagonist’s failed attempts to industrialize Arthurian England offers a stark rejection of Enlightenment notions that time and scientific initiative result in progress. By the 20th century, science no longer needed the qualifying term natural to denote methodological research capable of generating certainty about aspects of the physical world. Nevertheless, the definitional instability of the term remains to this day as the intellectual writings of social scientists, historians, and philosophers have increasingly questioned the supposed boundaries dividing science from other forms of intellectual and cultural work. Such writings argue that scientists belong to a distinct culture with its own ethics, politics, languages, and rituals, and that their work is shaped, in direct and indirect ways, by larger national and international pressures. Much 20th-century literature reflects and informs these observations by questioning science’s autonomy and objectivity. In many texts, scientific research and its technologies become driving forces behind the growth of consumer culture, corporations, economic systems, and political entities. In his U.S.A. trilogy, John Dos Passos employs a narrative technique that interweaves documentary sources, newspaper collages, fiction, montage techniques from film, and biographical sketches to depict the lives of working
Americans in an industrial culture. His rapid narrative transitions emphasize the role of communication, entertainment, and information technologies in shaping lived experience. A few decades after Dos Passos’s trilogy, Ray Bradbury’s fiction would consistently imagine future worlds in which consumer culture and entertainment technologies render the critical imagination obsolete and undesirable. His Fahrenheit 451, along with Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, dramatize how computer and surveillance technologies disseminate and enforce values compatible with the dominant power structures. These nightmare worlds depict entire populations that come to see individual conformity as an acceptable price to pay for national security. Other texts reveal a growing ambivalence toward the seeming omnipresence of military and information technologies in our lives. An atomic war might be the cause of the airplane crash that strands a group of schoolboys on a deserted island at the beginning of William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, but details of the cataclysm are mentioned only in passing. Later in the novel, the bestial violence that erupts on the island suggests that military technologies might be little more than extensions of an inherently violent and combative human nature. Published a few decades later, Don DeLillo’s White Noise employs an ironic and ambivalent narrative voice for a plot that juxtaposes consumer excess, unstable identities, omnipresent information technologies, and looming threats of ecological disaster. In complex ways, these texts contribute to the always unfinished work of historicizing and theorizing the relations between society, science, and technology. They reflect and contribute to larger cultural debates about how best to understand the impact of science on our present circumstances and how to approach an uncertain future in which technology and science will unquestionably play a role. See also Adams, Henry: Education of Henry Adams, The; Lowry, Lois: Giver, The; Poe, Edgar Allan: “Murders in the Rue Morgue, The”; Silko Leslie Marmon: Ceremony; Steinbeck, John: Cannery Row; Stevenson, Robert Louis: Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr.
98â•…â•… sex and sexuality Hyde; Vonnegut, Kurt: Cat ’s Cradle; Whitman, Walt: Leaves of Grass. FURTHER READING Daly, Nicholas. Literature, Technology, and Modernity, 1860–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Marx, Leo. The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964. Scholnick, Robert, ed. American Literature and Science. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1982.
Neal Bukeavich
sex and sexuality
Many classic works of literature have been banned because of their treatment of sex or sexuality. School boards, parents, and governments have tried to stop children and adults from reading such works as Aristophanes’ Lysistrata, Daniel Defoe’s Moll Flanders, Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass, Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita, Maya Angelou’s I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man, J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, D. H. Lawrence’s Women in Love, and a long list of others, because these books were felt to deal with issues involving sex in ways that were deemed inappropriate or obscene. Objections range from a “too frank” discussion of rape, as in I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings; to depictions of promiscuity thought to be too suggestive, as in Moll Flanders; to descriptions of consensual sexual intercourse labeled too “explicit,” as in Women in Love. Sex, both the physical act and the broad range of feelings involved in sexual desire, is an important part of human life. It is, of course, the way in which we procreate and thus the method by which our species survives, but outside of procreation, sex and sexual desire are vital components of what it means to be human. All healthy human beings have sexual impulses and sexual desires. Our sexual histories, fantasies, and relationships (or the lack thereof ) are a part of our identities. Literature, as a mirror on the human condition, therefore must address the subject of sex and sexuality, but there are great variations on how and to what extent.
The human need to procreate is one obvious reason why sex is so important to human beings, but it is by no means the only reason, or even the primary one. Sexual desire—even merely feeling it, not necessarily acting upon it—has been seen as inspiring as well as impure, as a generator of creativity but also as an initiator of debilitating guilt, as the source of life’s greatest pleasures, and as the cause of life’s greatest pain. From the beginnings of Western civilization, discussing and writing about sex has been controversial. In Desire: A History of European Sexuality, Ann Clark explains that Western thought regarding sex has traditionally been divided into two competing threads: one that sees sexual desire as “polluting and dangerous,” and one that sees it as “creative, transcendent, and transformative” (1). Some ancient Greeks worried that reason and sexual desire were incompatible, but in general the Greeks did “not see sex itself as shameful or honorable” and believed that “aggressive sexual energy could be a force for fertility, culture, and spirituality” (15). They even used “the language of erotic love to describe the ascent from earthly love to spiritual love” (1). In fact, sex for the ancient Greeks only became a “problem” when it transgressed the boundaries of the social order, as when a man had sex with another man’s wife (i.e., his property) or if a man of the upper class took a submissive role in sex with a man of the lower classes. The early church, however, had a largely negative attitude toward sex and sexual desire, seeing celibacy as a better, more pure way of life. In Jewish life, sexual desire was not seen as inherently evil, and sex within marriage was a definite good. However, early Christians, such as the apostle Paul in the first century, saw sex, even sex within marriage, as a dangerous corruption that would lead believers away from God (39). Saint Augustine, for example, writing in the fourth century, greatly admired celibates and felt much guilt about his early pagan life. This attitude, that sex is polluting, corrupting, and dirty, is present even today. In literature, we see this attitude in many works. In William Shakespeare’s King Lear, for instance, men who pursue their sexual desires are clearly painted as fools, doomed to eventual ruin. In Thomas Hardy’s Jude the Obscure, Sue Bride-
sex and sexualityâ•…â•… 99 head sees the act of sex as the road to disaster, avoids it whenever she can, and blames her sexual relationship with Jude for their tragic end. Other works of literature hold the opposite view, however, treating sex as a positive force, even sometimes as a useful metaphor for things such as ambition, transcendence, and crossing difficult boundaries. In Lysistrata, for example, the women know that they can use sex as a weapon for peace. Thus, sex is seen as wholly positive. The men want sex because it delivers pleasure, and the women know that its power is so great that it can end the wars they so despise. Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night ’s Dream shows the reader that while a surrender to lust can be destructive, as when Oberon tricks Titania into sleeping with Bottom, sexual union within marriage brings about great things: fertility, spirituality, and creativity. Similarly, the relationship between Rupert and Ursula in D. H. Lawrence’s Women in Love is portrayed as an ideal sexual relationship, transcendent and mystical, that unites the two lovers while still leaving them as individual beings. Women in Love is only one of the many Lawrence novels that treat sex and sexuality so frankly. The Rainbow, Lady Chatterley’s Lover, and Sons and Lovers all contain plots that emphasize the important role of sex and sexuality in the lives of human beings. Lawrence was heavily influenced by the psychosexual development theories of the Austrian psychologist Sigmund Freud. Freud’s theories on how we develop as sexual beings are so important to the way in which we think about sex and the brain that they cannot be ignored. He argues that all adult neurosis is borne from childhood sexuality. According to his theories, we have instinctive sexual appetites, even as infants, and these appetites mature in a series of changes, with the object of our affection being the primary change. Freud believed that getting “stuck” in one phase was the source of psychological problems in adults. He even used a work of literature, Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, to name the complex in which an adult remains fixated on his mother as the object of affection. Freud’s theories on psychosexual development received an enormous amount of attention throughout most of the 20th century. However, other
scientists have criticized his theories for being focused on sex to the exclusion of other elements that influence our personalities, and feminists have pointed out that his theories focus heavily on male sexuality. Nevertheless, his attention to sexual desire as an important part of our personalities was an invaluable step in terms of transforming the ways in which we talk about sex and sexuality. The French theorist Michel Foucault points out this importance in his own influential work The History of Sexuality (1976–84). Foucault’s argument counteracts the generally accepted narrative that in Western society, talk of sex is repressed. Instead, he claims that since the 19th century, discourse about sex has exploded, in venues such as the doctor’s office and the church confessional. As in those two examples, however, this discourse has been controlled by those in power, keeping those not in power marginalized. Part of this control involves labeling certain sex acts, or even sexual urges, pathological. Foucault’s own identity as an open homosexual to his friends, but not open to the rest of the world, may have influenced his thinking here. In fact, briefly surveying the treatment of homosexuality in literature, one might be left with the mistaken impression that there were no open homosexuals well into the 20th century. Homosexual themes and story lines abound in this history, but they are almost always coded and indirect. One of the most famous examples is in Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s In Memoriam, A. H. H, an elegiac poem written after the death of his dear friend Arthur Hallam. Tennyson speaks of his loss in intense terms, some of which have become famous for speaking of heterosexual love: “↜’Tis better to have loved and lost, than never to have loved at all” (Canto 27, 15–16). That the object of his love and his loss was another man was not considered scandalous, precisely because Tennyson was indirect here, rather than explicit. In fact, describing close, intense friendships between same-sex pairs is one of the most common ways in which homosexuality has historically been expressed in literature. Writers as diverse as Edmund Spenser, Lord Byron, Sarah Orne Jewett, and Virginia Woolf have written of these devoted friendships in a way that allows the spirit of same-sex love to be expressed without
100â•…â•… social class explicitly naming the relationship as a sexual one. In addition, literary critics have long found homoerotic undertones in works that involve “male bonding,” even when that was not necessarily the author’s intention. The American critic Leslie Fiedler noted these undertones between Huck and Jim in Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn in his famous essay “Come Back A’gin to the Raft, Huck Honey” (1948). Fiedler and others have pointed out similar relationships between Ishmail and Queequeg in Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick, the vampire hunting crew in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, and Finny and Gene in John Knowles’s A Separate Peace. Openly homosexual characters in literature were rare until the late 20th century. Society’s prohibition against same-sex relationships, as well as the probable desire of some homosexual authors to keep their sexuality hidden, limited the direct display of any sexual orientation that was not heterosexual in all forms of art. In fact, when the lesbian author Radclyffe Hall published the lesbian novel The Well of Loneliness in 1928, she was put on trial for obscenity. When homosexuality did make an open appearance in literature before this point, it was usually mocked, as in many English plays of the 18th century, or clearly considered a failing, as in Tennessee Williams’s Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. The end of the 20th century saw a somewhat more open attitude, with texts like James Baldwin’s Go Tell It on the Mountain and Jeannette Winterson’s Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit treating homosexuality as one important facet of a character’s identity. While sex and sexuality are clearly vital to human existence, their treatment in print has often been oblique, requiring the reader to read between the lines and tease out meanings from indirect references and suggestive metaphors. Obviously necessary for the continuation of the species, sex is also of paramount importance in terms of identity and can have a profound effect on our health and our emotions. Literature, therefore, has always addressed the issue and will continue to do so (perhaps more openly) as we move into the 21st century. See also Chopin, Kate: Awakening, The; Cisneros, Sandra: Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories; Dreiser, Theodore: Sister Car-
rie;
Erdrich, Louise: Love Medicine; Hesse, Herman: Steppenwolf; Jacobs, Harriet: Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself; James, Henry: Turn of the Screw, The; Marshall, Paule: Brown Girl, Brownstones; Shakespeare, William: Taming of the Shrew, The; Silko, Leslie Marmon: Almanac of the Dead; Smith, Jean: Tree Grows in Brooklyn, A; Toomer, Jean: Cane; Walker, Alice: Color Purple, The. FURTHER READING Clark, Anna. Desire: A History of European Sexuality. New York and London: Routledge, 2008. Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage, 1978.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
social class
Contemporary and historical studies of varied social structure systems suggest that stratification of wealth and status is inevitable. When people come together to form a community, one of the results is an intricate organization wherein we notice a continuum of wealth and status ranging from the most deprived street beggar to the most privileged administrator of that society. Currently there are many types of these stratified systems in existence, and a cursory understanding of a few of them will give a reader insight into his or her own society’s hierarchical structure. And with a closer look at many postindustrial societies’ class systems, we are better able to understand why and how writers find the inspection of this type of social hierarchy so valuable. Social stratification takes many forms, and the class system with which we are familiar in the United States is only one of many. While there are infinite other divisions that separate groups from one another, we might relate these divisions to three qualities that give a group more privilege than another: power, status, and wealth. A few categories of these stratifying structures are those of the caste, estate, and slavery systems (Schaefer 187–188). India, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan have a long history of the caste system, wherein people’s occupations, earning capabilities, and life opportunities are determined by ancestral background. Once
social classâ•…â•… 101 born into a caste, a person will face many obstacles in attempting to maneuver beyond certain stigmas or narrowly defined possibilities dictated by caste membership. Alternatively, the estate system, or feudalism, is based on land ownership, as well as the power and wealth that come with such ownership. Under this system, a lowly serf might serve a life of physical labor with little hope of owning land, while a lordly landowner would pass down property through familial inheritance. Thus, families maintain powerful status in the feudal system. The slavery system also encourages the power of families in maintaining ownership of land and slaves. Until the mid-19th century in the United States, the slavery system enabled families in the Confederate States to exercise much economic and political power. This power did not wholly dissipate after the abolition of the slavery system. The caste, estate, and slavery systems are all examples of “closed systems” of social ranking (Schaefer 536). Alternatively, an “open system” is one that offers individuals opportunity for greater mobility between levels in the hierarchical social structure. The class system falls under this “open system” category. Max Weber, an influential German sociologist of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, proposed three distinctions for the purpose of analyzing and categorizing people and groups within this system: class, status, and wealth (Schaefer 191). People in this system are stratified into social classes that we normally subdivide based on families’ and individuals’ monetary income. Along with greater monetary income comes the capability to access certain luxuries and amenities that a lesser income may not allow. Accordingly, the stratified levels of this system are labeled along a continuum of wealth, which, as we have seen, is concomitant in most cases with continuums of power and status. W. Lloyd Warner, in his book Social Class in America, recommends a six-level ranking system of social class divided into the (1) upper-upper, (2) lower-upper, (3) uppermiddle, (4) lower-middle, (5) upper-lower, and (6) lower-lower classes (14). Along with these differing class levels and their respective access to wealth and earning power come capabilities and deprivations closely associated with
such rankings. Literature that deals with social class often comments on these capabilities and deprivations. According to Warner, authors who focus on class characteristically give their attention to the phenomena of social inequality—the tragic or comic, but always strained, relations between the members of different social strata, and the rise and fall of individuals and families, particularly emphasizing the strivings of people to climb into the class above and the efforts of those above to keep them out. (231) In conjunction with this type of commentary, an author might focus on divisive group characteristics that are necessarily linked to social class. Gender, race, genealogy, and locality are among some of the characteristics that might affect, at least in part, one’s social class. In their study Women and Social Class, Pamela Abbot and Roger Sapsford ask a question, specifically with regard to women: Are open systems really open? According to these scholars, current theoretical analyses of social class do not thoroughly explain “the subordinate position of women” or “adequately reflect the full range of stratification, social mobility and class awareness” of those living within class systems (1). We can easily expand Abbot and Sapsford’s viewpoint to apply to other groups that are similarly limited in their abilities to move from lower social strata to higher class status. Various authors, poets, and playwrights establish similar perspectives. In William Faulkner’s Light in August, we see the struggles of a young man with a multiethnic background. The protagonist, Joe Christmas, lives in early 20th-century Mississippi and falls victim to a local community’s rumors, prejudice, and violence. He meets one frustrating situation after another in his effort to evade the history of exploitation and hatred directed at him and others of African-American ancestry. Though coming, in part, from Anglo-European lineage, he cannot evade victimization and prejudice. As a result, he sees no prospects of rising out of the lower class, even though Joanna Burden, his clandestine lover and sympathizer, encourages him to pursue an
102â•…â•… social class education. Christmas internalizes the racial “glass ceiling” and sees it at each possible opportunity. Addressing issues of social class has been a pattern in literature for some time, yet facing the realities of the lower class’s plight has been a somewhat recent development in literature. Novels focusing on the lifestyles and scandals of those in the upper classes were common during the Victorian Age (1837–1901) in Europe and the United States. Members of the upper classes steeped in luxury appear in novels such as Henry James’s Daisy Miller and Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations. However, Dickens also focuses on the plight of the lower classes, a focus uncommon in the early 19th century. Dickens’s open-eyed awareness and experience of poverty motivated him to tell tales that depicted the struggles of the poor: a primary theme in many of his novels. The late 19th and early 20th century (sometimes known as the Gilded Age) saw an increase in literary attention on laborers and vagabonds of the lower class. Eric Shocket describes this focus as the “gaze over the divide at the Other” (2), suggesting that those who read these texts are more privileged than those under inspection. Stephen Crane, a popular and groundbreaking author of this period, created works that exposed the reading public to degraded images of the underprivileged. In his works, he paints grim pictures of those who endure many of the hardships associated with ghetto life. He and other writers of the naturalist movement likewise comment on the struggles of similarly deprived groups: those thought to be racially inferior and those from purportedly less-refined gene pools. During the Gilded Age, cultural views of gender, race, and ethnic equality were much less egalitarian than those of contemporary Europe and America, and these dated views are apparent in works of the period. Crane’s short novel Maggie: A Girl of the Streets (1893) shows the heart-wrenching trials of a poverty-stricken adolescent and the abuse she endures at the hands of her family, and eventually at the hands of seducers. The lamentable qualities of the living conditions in the San Francisco slums compound our sorrow at her demise. Many works that deal with social class tend to take on a “rags to riches” theme by showing
characters striving to move from a lower to higher social stratum. The American media is particularly strewn with this trope. “[M]ass magazines and newspapers print and reprint the legendary story of rags to riches and tell over and over again the Ellis-island-to-Park-Avenue saga in the actual lives of contemporary successful immigrant men and women” (Warner 4). Some might question the degree to which this ideal is attainable, though we may quote multiple well-known examples. By way of challenging this trope, authors such as Theodore Dreiser have shown the damaging effects of such an ideology. Drieser’s novel An American Tragedy shows a young, intelligent, and energetic member of the lower class striving to reach the upper class by becoming a successful businessperson. Elitist ostracism, spite, and misfortune lead to Clyde Griffith’s eventual downfall after his attempt to climb the social class ladder. Inner turmoil, failed attempts at corporate climbing, and a confusing murder prosecution finally cause Griffith to regret his efforts. In depicting the protagonist’s ruin, Dreiser seems to suggest that one cannot easily abandon the learned tendencies of the lower class, nor climb easily upward in the social hierarchy. Today, fiction focusing on social climbing and plights of the lower and middle classes is very common. Much more than in literature of the 19th and early 20th centuries, we see novels combining issues of class with race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, and locality. Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner (2003) is a prime example of a novel which confronts these issues in a tale of a family’s struggle to survive in cold war–era Afghanistan. A Sunni Muslim father and son, after enduring unabated turmoil in Afghanistan, immigrate to California, where they must make a new start, emotionally and financially. Louise Erdrich’s Tracks confronts the desperate situation of a group of Native Americans in northern Minnesota. Her characters must come to terms with a new, dominant culture’s policies of land ownership and commerce. Nanapush, Fleur Pillager, and their immediate relatives must confront troubling changes to their local community; they face difficulty adapting to foreign concepts of property rights and class division. In the novel, the Indians are relegated to a remote area on the banks of a lake,
spiritualityâ•…â•… 103 where they attempt to sustain themselves. However, the local authorities confiscate their land because, by an unfortunate mishap, they have neglected to pay property taxes. They resist the foreign concepts of a highly organized class system. The local community subjugates them and eventually pushes them off the land they once inhabited. In the end, we see their way of life vanishing as a newer system takes its place. Partly as a result of these expanded and multitudinous considerations of societal inequality, some theorists question the efficacy of assessing social class as the primary source of stratification. The postmodernist movement encourages us to see aspects of culture as fragmented and uneasy to categorize or discern. Accordingly, some contemporary sociologists argue that social class is an “outmoded concept” and that we must consider the increasingly “fragmented” quality of social stratification (Devine 1). For these scholars, traditional class stratification concepts are changing and possibly no longer applicable to a postindustrialist society where the majority of people are preoccupied with lifestyle and amenity concerns. However, these theorists are currently on the margins of contemporary sociological study. They focus on a demographic that does not represent the myriad nations and communities characterized by highly varied stratification. Social class remains a prevalent reality for those living within its characteristic open system. Class greatly affects the way individuals, families, and communities prioritize particular ways of living. And where one falls within this stratified hierarchy is closely and irrevocably related to one’s intimate and outward identity. See also Achebe, Chinua: Anthills of the Savannah; Amis, Kingsley: Lucky Jim; Austen, Jane: Emma; Bellow, Saul: Adventures of Augie March, The; Cao Xueqin: Dream of the Red Chamber; Cather, Willa: My Ántonia; Dickens, Charles: G reat Expectations; Tale of Two Cities, A; Dreiser, Theodore: Sister Carrie; Fitzgerald, F. Scott: Great Gatsby, The; Hardy, Thomas: Tess of the d ’Urbervilles; James, Henry: Daisy Miller; Lewis, Sinclair: Main Street; Naylor, Gloria: Women of Brewster Place, The; Proust, Marcel: Remembrance
of Things Past; Shakespeare, William: Henry V;
Merchant of Venice, The; Midsummer Night ’s Dream, A; Shaw, George Bernard: Pygmalion; Smith, Betty: Tree Grows in Brooklyn, A; Swift, Jonathan: Modest proposal, A; Updike, John: Rabbit Run; Wharton, Edith: Age of Innocence, The; Woolf, Virginia: Mrs Dalloway. FURTHER READING Abbot, Pamela, and Roger Sapsford. Women and Social Class. London: Tavistock Publications, 1987. Devine, Fiona. Social Class in America and Britain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997. Schaefer, Richard T. Sociology. New York: McGrawHill, 1983. Shocket, Eric. Vanishing Moments: Class and American Literature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2006. Warner, W. Lloyd. Social Class in America: A Manual of Procedure for the Measurement of Social Status. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.
Liam Conway Nesson
spirituality
The term spirituality has been used in a great variety of ways, both religious and secular. When associated with religion, the term is practically inextricable from “God” and the myriad concepts connected with a belief in a higher power that guides, directs, and rewards human beings for leading a life in accordance with religious principles. From a secular perspective, the term is aligned with the workings of the mind, the senses, and the perceived material and, in some cases, immaterial world. For instance, the American transcendentalists used spirituality as a special mark of those superior intellects able to perceive a reality beyond the material world, a world of the “spirit” which is not necessarily dependent on the physical senses to interpret. Evangelical Christianity reserves the term to describe tender religious emotions, while, in contrast, the French have appropriated it as the name for the finer perceptions of life, which implies a firm link with the material evidence of reality around us. Various derivatives of the term include spiritual, spiritualism, spiritualist, spiritism, and the spirit, all words implying slightly
104â•…â•… spirituality more nuanced interpretations of the disconnect between the perceived reality of the physical world and a conceived reality of a realm beyond it—one that is not relative to, nor dependent on, the senses reacting in conjunction with the mind. If all of this sounds rather mysterious, it is primarily because the conceptual nature of the term has its etymological roots in the Hebrew word ruach, which refers to the ethereal or elusive nature of spirit, breath, or wind, as that which gives life and animation to something. Further, the term gets its modern implications from the Latin definition of immaterial (immaterialis, late Latin, 14th century) which consists of an essence that cannot be seen, contained, or even proven in a validated manner (i.e., scientifically). Thus, spirituality is a quality that is associated with persons or things but is paradoxically distinct from material or worldly concerns. Indeed, as the Scottish evangelist Henry Drummond stated in Natural Law in the Spiritual World (1883), “No spiritual man ever claims that his spirituality is his own” (89). This distinction between the material or natural world and the immaterial or spiritual world is central to the history of the debate regarding the nature of spirituality. By the 19th century, this debate assumed even greater proportions after Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species, which posited man’s descent from apes through a process of natural selection, thereby calling into doubt the validity of man’s creation by God as depicted in the book of Genesis in the Bible. The struggle to define spirituality in terms that account for this ongoing debate has continued ever since. However, what can be stated with assurance is that the concept of spirituality relates directly to the conception of faith and arises from a creative and dynamic synthesis of faith and life. Broadly interpreted, fiction is about the human condition, and spirituality is that sense of our selves as linked in some relational way to the larger concept of the universe. As such, this theme permeates nearly all fiction in ways that can be either subtle or dramatically overt, depending on how we as readers react to the conceptual, and frequently nonmaterial, clues provided by the author. Concepts such as the divine (or divinity), the soul or spirit, the mystical, transcendence, suffering, love, ecstasy, and even
human egotism are linked in multiple complex ways to our understanding and practice of spirituality. Among the Christians (especially the mystics) and the Sufis (a Muslim sect), the main concern of spiritual life is with the human mind and its divine essence. As Saint Catherine of Genoa, a renowned Christian mystic, wrote, “My Me is God, nor do I recognize any other Me” (quoted in Huxley 11, italics added). Within a religious context, there are myriad guides to understanding what constitutes the “spiritual” since religious history provides us with textual references that document, historicize, and instruct the individual’s understanding of the universe and their place in it. These guides include the Bible; the Torah; the Quran; and the writings of Buddha, the Hindu gods, and Confucius, to name but a few. Yet the spiritual cannot be confined to merely the religious and textual foundations of belief, since the spiritual also puts us in touch with that center of ourselves that is silent, mystical, and profoundly aware of the awesome beauty and power of what is clearly felt, yet beyond our control—the emotive force and energy of love; the symmetry and perfection of nature; and, not least of all, the passions and beliefs that ignite the soul. In more explicitly fictional terms, spirituality can be thematically reflected in texts through a number of literary devices that evoke specific spiritual responses from the reader. Readers may feel transformed in their consciousnesses or their lives, either vicariously through the fictive experience of one or more characters or more directly through a cathartic (energizing or healing) response to the work as a whole. Readers might also experience and know God through the creation of a fictional world; these works serve as allegories and are frequently imitative of previous works. Some works describe quest narratives that take one or more characters through the stages of a spiritual journey toward greater understanding of themselves; of the world around them; and of the nature of faith, hope, and love. Works that describe spirituality on this level may involve actual or imaginative travel to realms of otherworldliness, flights of fancy, or human physical/mental transport that defies the limitations of time and place. Other works infuse mystical feeling into their settings and natu-
stages of lifeâ•…â•… 105 ral worlds, such that a divine influence or presence is rendered as an aesthetic sensibility (an artistic, visual representation of beauty). Poetry, in particular, abounds with examples of natural imagery that is imbued with an ethereal quality reminiscent of spiritual perfection. Writers might also include symbols and motifs that emphasize aspects of faith particular to one or more sets of religious beliefs and values (the theology that can give rise to different spiritualities). Such references are usually universally identifiable by virtue of their iconic significance or historical prevalence, and they can include both occult as well as monotheistic images, such as angels, the all-seeing eye, butterflies, the cross of Christianity, the Celtic cross, the dove, the circle (or ring), the evil eye, the hexagram (or six-pointed star), the serpent or snake, the trident, and the triangle (or pyramid). For example, works such as Dante Alighieri’s The Divine Comedy, John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s P rogress, and John Milton’s Paradise Lost address the theme of spirituality within an exclusively religious or ecclesiastical context, since each work is essentially an allegory or parable that posits a fictional account of the respective Catholic, Puritan, and Episcopal traditions of religious life and afterlife as described by believers. Indeed, the function of parable in religion is to exhibit “form by form”; thus, natural phenomena serve mainly an illustrative function in religion. Accordingly, within each of these works, the path to spiritual awareness is well documented and the lines between good and evil are clearly drawn; the individual’s experience in life and on earth is characterized as a precursor to the progress of their soul after death. Similarly, works such as Herman Melville’s Billy Budd, Sailor; Arthur Miller’s The Crucible; George Eliot’s Silas Marner; and William Blake’s Songs of Innocence and of Experience can also be considered parables in which the individual is subjected to external, natural, and social forces characterized as both good and evil in order to illustrate the power of the spirit over the materiality and grossness of the world, albeit at a price. See also Anaya, Rudolfo: Bless Me, Ultima; Black Elk: Black Elk Speaks; Carver, Raymond: “Cathedral”; Davis, Robertson: Fifth Busi-
ness;
Dickinson, Emily: poems; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor: Crime and Punishment; Emerson, Ralph Waldo: “American Scholar, The”; “Divinity School Address, The”; Equiano, Olaudah: Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African, The; Hesse, Herman: Siddhartha; Ibsen, Henrik: Hedda Gabler; Kipling, Rudyard: Kim; Kureishi, Hanif: Buddha of Suburbbia, The; Reed, Ishmael: Mumbo Jumbo; Thoreau, Henry David: Walden. FURTHER READING Blythe, Ronald, et al. Ink and Spirit: Literature and Spirituality. Norwich, Eng.: Canterbury Press, 2000. Drummond, Henry. Natural Law in the Spiritual World. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1892. Huxley, Aldous. Perennial Philosophy. New York: HarperCollins, 1945.
Colleen Pauza
stages of life
If, as the American mythologist Joseph Campbell has suggested, a primary purpose of storytelling is “the reconciliation of consciousness with the preconditions of its existence” (180), then, given the undeniable precondition of mortality, it is to be expected that the journey a life makes in its arc from cradle to grave is a common concern of literature. Indeed, most of the world’s religions include in their respective mythologies ideas concerning life comprising segments or movements. For instance, Hinduism teaches that a life span consists of three primary stages: the student, the householder, and the retiree. The Talmud instructs that a man will find himself playing seven roles in his life: infant, child, boy, young man, married man, parent, and old man, each in regular succession. Cree Indian spiritualism holds that there are seven “times” that demarcate one’s existence, each characterized by a condition (e.g., confusion) or an action (e.g., planting). Similarly, when we look at traditional folktales, we find a persistent concern with stages of existence. From Aesop we have the story of the horse, the ox, and the dog who bestow upon man the gifts of their natures with which to divide up his life. Included in Grimm’s Fairy Tales is the narrative of God decid-
106â•…â•… stages of life ing the life span of each living thing, with man in his greed receiving the rejected remainder from the more humble donkey, dog, and monkey. Hence, working is burdensome, retirement is suspicious, and old age is foolish. The best description in a literary masterpiece of this tradition of inevitable progression through stages of life is the “All the world’s a stage” monologue of the cynical courtier Jaques in Shakespeare’s As You Like It (act 2, scene 7): All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players: They have their exits and their entrances, And one man in his time plays many parts, His acts being seven ages. At first the infant, Mewling and puking in the nurse’s arms: Then the whining school-boy, with his satchel And shining morning-face, creeping like snail Unwillingly to school. And then the lover, Sighing like furnace, with a woeful ballad Made to his mistress’ eyebrow. Then a soldier, Full of strange oaths, and bearded like the pard, Jealous in honour, sudden, and quick in quarrel, Seeking the bubble reputation, Even in the cannon’s mouth. And then the justice, In fair round belly with good capon lin’d, With eyes severe, and beard of formal cut, Full of wise saws and modern instances; And so he plays his part. The sixth age shifts Into the lean and slipper’d pantaloon, With spectacles on nose and pouch on side; His youthful hose, well sav’d, a world too wide For his shrunk shank; and his big manly voice, Turning again toward childish treble, pipes And whistles in his sound. Last scene of all, That ends this strange eventful history,
Is second childishness, and mere oblivion, Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything. In Edgar Allan Poe’s masterful allegory “The Masque of the Red Death,” Prince Prospero vainly imagines he can first wall out and then defeat death. The arrangement of the abbey within which Prospero and his guests imagine themselves to be invulnerable is symbolic and also highly evocative of Jaques’s speech: seven rooms, each of a different hue and thus character, each imperceptible from the vantage point of the others. There is a sense in which the concept of life comprising stages is less a theme of literature than a precondition itself, an assumed norm, and many thematic concerns arise from the frustration, retardation, or inhibition of the process. That is, characters who fail to progress in a timely fashion experience considerable turmoil and anguish due to their unnatural state. This posits the notion that the stages are contingent on volition, the character’s capacity to make the proper choices or draw the correct conclusions from experience. Consider, for instance, the number of memorable characters who are, in essence, stuck as adolescents. Holden Caulfield in J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye is, though still young, unnaturally bent on dividing the world into “phonies” (nearly every adult) and those more like his sister Phoebe and late brother Allie, whom he imagines to be uncorrupted and static in a wholly unrealistic way. His inability to function at a level appropriate to his age (failure at a succession of preparatory schools, childish infatuation without any overt action with Jane Gallagher, impotent response to the prostitute Sunny) could all be seen as inevitable consequences of his untenable mental/emotional/spiritual stage/age (roughly 12, instead of 16). Similarly, though in many respects more egregiously, Harry Angstrom from John Updike’s Rabbit, Run cannot bring himself to accept the preconditions of life as a 26-year old husband and father-to-be. Just as his nickname implies, he runs, toward irresponsibility and what he imagines to be inconsequential hedonism with a prostitute. However, as the tragedy of his denials unfolds, we are
successâ•…â•… 107 made to understand that Harry’s flight from young adulthood is not only futile but also destructive. Interestingly, Updike’s three subsequent installments of Harry’s life all find him at least one step behind (and he dies where he essentially began—playing basketball). Just as striking are the sundry literary characters whose progress through the latter stages of existence is thwarted by magic, addiction, attachment to the past, or a simple lack of faith. In his poem “Tithonus,” Alfred, Lord Tennyson memorably depicted the story of Tithonus, Aurora’s beloved, doomed to “wither slowly” in her arms because he cannot die. His is the story of the dark side of immortality, of course, the realization that our fear of death often obscures its necessity. T. S. Eliot’s Prufrock, in “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” offers the figure of one who seeks to arrest the progress of time by never choosing (“Do I dare?”). He grows old, but he cannot “force the moment to its crisis”—that is, he remains more observer than agent in his own life. Like Tithonus, he has come to realize that there are worse things than the surrender to the inevitable conclusion of life—namely, that one can live out a spiritual death of excruciating torture. Fiction writers subsequent to the advent of modernism at the turn of the 20th century seemed increasingly inclined to suggest that, far from inevitable, progress through life necessarily involves struggle and, ideally, a crucible or challenging ritual that forces graduation to the next stage. Later in the century, Leslie Marmon Silko’s Ceremony offered the compelling portrait of Tayo, whose alcoholism and inner turmoil keep him rooted in the crucible of his youth, World War II. Through the help of Betonie, the shaman, he is able to see a way forward by accepting the crucible of the moment. Tayo realizes “there were transitions that had to be made in order to become whole again” (170). Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea is another example of this concept of conditional stages at work. Santiago’s crucible of more than 80 days of fishing without a catch becomes the ultimate test of faith in himself, his traditions, his beliefs, and his capacity for endurance. By implication, Santiago’s great struggle is the struggle we all must face as the time of our thriving inevitably
passes, when the world is unlikely to offer much in the way of affirmation. For Santiago, the passage through is not a form of surrender nor, certainly, a turning away from the moment toward fantasy. Rather, his essence is reaffirmed by the fact of his endurance, his ultimate landing of the great marlin. Although the marlin is stripped of its tangible value by sharks, Santiago’s victory is ensured by the enormity of the skeleton. In a sense, Santiago’s triumph unifies all the stages of a life lived in obedience to a code. Ironically, had he changed with the times, he would have negated his very existence. His ultimate test of faith in himself comes when he has the least reason for faith, which Hemingway strongly suggests is the nature of life when he has Santiago tell the young Manolin that September is the time of the great fish, and thus “anyone can be a fisherman in May” (18). See also Carroll, Lewis: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland; Frost, Robert: poems; Gaines, Ernest J.: Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, The; Houston, Jeanne Wakatsuki: Farewell to Manzanar; Hurston, Zora Neale: Their Eyes Were Watching God; Shakespeare, William: Tempest, The; Shelley, Percy Bysshe: poems; Wilder, Thornton: Our Town; Williams, Tennessee: Cat on a Hot Tin Roof; Wordsworth, William: “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey”; Wright, Richard: Black Boy. FURTHER READING Campbell, Joseph. The Mythic Dimension: Selected Essays 1959–1987. Edited by Antony Van Couvering. San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1997. Hemingway, Ernest. The Old Man and the Sea. New York: Scribner, 1975. Silko, Leslie Marmon. Ceremony. 1977. Reprint, New York: Penguin, 2006.
Daniel Ryan Morse
success
What does it mean to be successful in life? Many people would equate success with wealth, but some wealthy people are profoundly unhappy. Others would equate success with power or fame, which are equally problematic. If we assume that being successful is about attaining goals, few would pur-
108â•…â•… success sue goals that were geared toward making them unhappy. It seems, then, that success might best be equated with, or at least linked to, happiness. Indeed, when we look at differing accounts of the “successful” over time, we see that one thing they have in common, whether we are discussing a simple, yeoman farmer from the 18th century, or the 20thcentury steel baron Andrew Carnegie, is that they were pursuing their dreams in order that they might achieve excellence and be fulfilled. In other words, they were tying success to personal happiness, not to wealth, power, or fame. Those things might come as accessories to success, but they are not the primary motivators. Literature is full of characters for whom those empty dreams are the driving forces, and those characters usually meet bad ends. In order to see the truly “successful” among the pantheon of literary characters, we must first explore exactly what we mean by success. Although thoughts on success and its nature are quite common in literature, often the characters who embody it or seek it are deeply unhappy and dissatisfied with their lives. The philosopher Tom Morris might argue that this is because these characters are confusing true success with something else, something destructive in its emptiness. In his 1994 book True Success, Morris argues that we misconceive the meaning of success, confusing it with fame or with power or, most often, with wealth. But, he says, we can all think of wealthy people who are unhappy or who did nothing on their own to attain their wealth. Both of these qualifications seem to go against the basic definition of success: obtaining the object of one’s desire. In Silas Marner, by George Eliot, Silas hoards the gold he earns, becoming very wealthy but very unhappy. It is not until he has a fulfilling purpose in life, raising Eppie, that he can truly be called successful. The extreme unhappiness and dissatisfaction of the wealthy Sutpen family from William Faulkner’s Absalom! Absalom! demonstrates how inherited wealth does not automatically bring success. Thomas Sutpen is a self-made man whose outward appearance might be the picture of success. But although he is wealthy and powerful, he not only guarantees his own unhappiness by denouncing his part-black son but also passes that unhappiness on to his chil-
dren. He ends his life an alcoholic, murdered by the grandfather of his 15-year-old mistress and largely forgotten by his community. Like wealth, fame and power do not guarantee success either. Both can be fleeting, and if our only end is to achieve them, not to find fulfillment in the pursuits that led to the fame and the power, then we are doomed to fail. In our tabloid rich society, it is not difficult to think of people whom power and fame had seemingly put on top of the world, but who quickly descended to the depths of failure. In lieu of the dubious pursuits of wealth, fame, and power, Morris posits a new conception of success, one requiring that we incorporate certain conditions into our daily lives. He says, “Our idea of success should be more closely related to our ideas of excellence and fulfillment. And to our idea of happiness” (32). He claims that to truly be successful, we must have a clear idea of what we are seeking; we must be confident and consistent, committed to the pursuit and the concentration it takes; and finally, and perhaps most interestingly in light of literature, we must have character of “high quality” and the capacity to enjoy our success. Morris contends here that if “success” is pursued for immoral means or if the spoils of success are the only motivator, then that is not “true success.” Morris is (understandably) working against the popular 20th-century concept of success. Interestingly, definitions of success prior to this period were more in line with Morris’s thinking. Rex Burns, in Success in America, explores older ideas of success, focusing on the yeoman farmer, the epitome of success in the 18th century. He explains that under this conception, there were three major elements in order to claim success: competence, independence, and morality. This farmer needed not wealth, and certainly not fame or power, to be considered successful. In fact, Jeffrey Decker explains in Made in America that in the 18th and 19th centuries, success was “character based.” There was an explicit link between productive enterprise and religious faith that came to be known as the “Protestant work ethic,” which informs the stories of Horatio Alger, popular in the 19th and early 20th centuries. These stories, sometimes called “rags to riches” or “luck and pluck” stories, usually involve a poor adolescent boy
successâ•…â•… 109 who manages to rise to prosperity on the strength of his character and determination. Decker believes that these stories allowed turn of the century readers “an outlet for reinforcing their belief in the residual concept of character based success” (2). American literature from this period and into the 20th century is full of examples of characters who, because they lack character, cannot be truly successful. Besides the aforementioned Thomas Sutpen, there is Jay Gatsby, the title character of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. Gatsby earns his wealth through questionable associations with unscrupulous people, all so that he may win the love of Daisy Buchanan. Even were he to achieve this goal, he would not be truly successful. He would be unable to enjoy his achievement, because he showed poor character in its pursuit, and because he is denying his true identity in the entire enterprise. Like Sutpen, Gatsby ends up a victim of murder. Willy Loman, from Arthur Miller’s Death of A Salesman, is an excellent example of a character who strives his whole life for success, but because he does not really understand what success is, he is doomed to never achieve it. Willy wants only to be “well-liked” and takes no joy from the job he thinks will help him to achieve this end. He interacts with his family only in the context of how successful he is, and since this existence is a lie, his relationships with them are empty. Like Willy, Rabbit Angstrom in John Updike’s Rabbit, Run desperately bemoans the life he sees as mundane and stagnant, thinking that his only successes in life are behind him, with the glory of his high school basketball career. Because he puts no focus, concentration, or passion into his current life, he cannot feel, even to mourn the death of his baby daughter. On the other hand, a character such as Jo March, from Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women, despite a distinct lack of wealth, power, and social status, ends the narrative very happy and, because she achieves her aims, successful. Jo wants to be an intellectually independent woman, and in 19th-century New England, this was not a common or easily attained goal. She rejects the love of Laurie because, despite her affection for him, she knows he will want a traditional marriage. She moves to New York to pursue her love of writing and gain independence,
and there she meets her true mate, Professor Bhaer, who understands and respects her forthright, determined nature. She opens a school, marries Bhaer, and ends the novel the epitome of success. While success as a theme is common in all American literature, it is perhaps most common in African-American literature. This is perhaps because, as Audrey Edwards and Craig K. Polite argue, for black Americans, success is “a relative” phenomenon, “measured as much by what has been overcome as by what has been achieved” (3). Often systematically denied a level playing field, such as equal educations, equal access to certain careers, and equal opportunities to live and work in desirable places, African Americans have been forced to define success differently than whites. In addition, the specter of failure has been so internalized among African Americans that many may feel that they are inferior and cannot truly compete in the white world. Thus, success and its pursuit are frequently explored in texts by African-American writers. Booker T. Washington’s Up from Slavery presents one view of African-African success, albeit a controversial one. Washington believed blacks’ road to success was to be found in learning to work hard, have good manners, and participate in the rank and file of the working class. At the Tuskegee Institute, a school he founded, all students had to participate in menial chores as well as their studies. Although many students rebelled, Washington was resolute in his view that blacks had to build a modest foundation before they could reach for the heights of success. Ralph Kabnis, in Jean Toomer’s Cane, represents the rebellious students who did not agree with Washington’s plan. Educated in the North, he does not anticipate that despite his credentials and social standing, he will be forced to act deferential around all whites, even those who are less educated than he and who hold a less prestigious place in society. Like many African Americans both before him and after him, he finds that he must begin in a metaphorical hole and dig his way out just to get the respect any human being deserves. Characters like Ralph chafe against Washington’s idea that blacks should prove their worth to whites. Instead, they want that worth to be assumed from the beginning.
110â•…â•… suffering Feeling worthy of success in this way is, perhaps, a criterion for achieving it. The underlying reason why many literary characters who are focused on wealth, power, and fame fail spectacularly in these pursuits is because there is no intrinsic value in their quest. When we strive for wealth just for wealth’s sake, and not because what we are doing to achieve it fulfills us, we are doomed to fail. See also Angelou, Maya: I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings; Dos Passos, John: U.S.A. trilogy; Franklin, Benjamin: Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, The; Morrison, Toni: Tar Baby; Mukherjee, Bharati: Middleman and Other Stories, The; Naipaul, V. S.: House for Mr. Biswas, A; Steinbeck, John: Cannery Row; Wilde, Oscar: Importance of Being Ernest; The. FURTHER READING Burns, Rex. Success in America. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1976. Decker, Jeffrey. Made in America. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997. Edwards, Audrey, and Craig K. Polite. Children of the Dream. New York: Doubleday, 1992. Morris, Tom. True Success. New York: Putnam, 1994.
Jennifer McClinton-Temple
suffering
Human beings shrink from suffering. We avoid confronting the afflictions of others because it is unpleasant, and if we focus on suffering for too long, it could give us a pessimistic view of the world. Nevertheless, we remain avid fans of television dramas, intense and violent movies, and works of literature that speak to the truest of human experiences. We read stories of the tragedies of others, partly as a form of escapism from our own troubles but also to reinforce our conviction that suffering is meaningful, as the conflicts in literature are almost always resolved (though perhaps not always to our satisfaction). In this way, literature involving suffering often restores our faith in justice and aids us in grappling with the question of why we suffer at all. At times characters’ trials are a tool authors use to reveal truths about the human condition, address flaws in society, or identify ways in which suffer-
ing can function as a motivator for progress (either individual or large-scale). Portrayals of suffering in literature also add realism and drama to the work while involving, influencing, and at times even challenging the reader. The theme of arbitrary, undeserved suffering has been taken up by a number of writers, including Shirley Jackson. In her short story “The Lottery” (1948), a quaint town prepares for an annual tradition. All of the families are present, and everyone draws a piece of paper out of a box. Tessie Hutchinson picks the one with the mark on it. The story ends abruptly and morbidly, with Tessie being stoned to death by her family and other members of the town. Her death is not redemptive, not meaningful except insofar as it constitutes in itself the meaning or essence of life. It is merely the result of a backward, empty ritual that the characters refuse to challenge. The town can also be interpreted as a microcosm of the world, in which people are capable of inflicting harm on others for no apparent reason. “The Lottery” is thus a parable about the arbitrariness of suffering, many of the traditions we hold, and of life itself. The cruelty inflicted by people or institutions, like that in “The Lottery,” is addressed in many other literary works as well. In such cases, depictions of suffering are often used in the service of social critique. For example, in her novel The Bluest Eye, Toni Morrison confronts the reader with the harsh realities of growing up in a dysfunctional African-American family during a time of lingering discrimination and racism. The novel tells the story of a young girl, Pecola, who is tortured by abusive parents and deeply rooted feelings of inadequacy. As a result of her being raped by her father and becoming pregnant with his child, Pecola’s childhood is cut short, and she eventually slips into madness. Her self-esteem is virtually nonexistent from having grown up with the notion that whiteness is inherent in the definition of beauty. Her suffering, however, is merely the latest in a chain of human suffering as a result of the cruelty of others. Her father was abandoned by his parents and tormented by white men from early on. He is apathetic toward his marriage and life in general, while his wife, Pecola’s mother, is physically disabled and endures her husband’s abuse
sufferingâ•…â•… 111 because she feels she is deserving of it. Like Pecola, she is vastly insecure and has adopted society’s limited standards for beauty. She refuses to believe Pecola’s account of the rape and beats her. Many of the characters in Morrison’s novel are both victims and perpetrators of suffering, which contributes to its realism. We learn behavior from figures of authority, and after being affected repeatedly by the cruelty of others or of society, it is hard not to react by mimicking that behavior for self-preservational reasons, thereby continuing the cycle. Accounts of suffering as a result of human cruelty are most powerful in stories that are based in truth. This is the case in Elie Wiesel’s account of the Holocaust, entitled Night. The atrocities described through Wiesel’s narrator are all the more poignant because we know them to be real. The novel, which is in part a memoir, also addresses how suffering can lead to a crisis of (or loss of ) faith. In Night, the main character, Eliezer, is a devout Jew who endures the horror of the Jewish concentration camps. As a youth, he learned about God’s goodness and omnipotence; however, after being separated from his mother and sister, seeing babies burned alive and children hanged, and being forced to work long days with little or no food, his faith in a compassionate God wavers, understandably. The cruelty of the Nazis and even of the other prisoners is at odds with his religious teachings. He doubts and questions the existence of God but still references biblical passages. Although his intense suffering causes a crisis of faith, he never abandons his faith, but he grapples with reevaluating it to better explain his experience. Suffering, then, can act as a catalyst for learning and for spiritual and mental renewal. Suffering can also result from social institutions and philosophies, rather than from direct physical cruelty or arbitrary, superhuman forces. Lorraine Hansberry’s play A Raisin in the Sun illustrates the suffering that is caused by class stratification and the illusions inherent in both class divisions and the striving to ascend to a higher class. The Youngers are trapped by their social class and unable to move up in the world. They hungrily look forward to a $10,000 insurance check from the deceased Mr. Younger’s life-insurance policy. Each member of the family has his or her own personal plan for where
the money should go, but they ultimately decide to spend it on a new house in a white neighborhood. They are soon approached by a man who is willing to pay them to keep them from moving in. The Youngers are limited not only economically but also as a result of latent discrimination. They are unable to attain the American dream: that with hard work and perseverance, one can achieve anything. Rather, they are only able to improve their situation when they collectively decide to put the well-being of the family as a whole before their individual wishes. By cooperating and working together, they can transcend those boundaries that limit them, if not materialistically then in their outlook on life. Portrayals of suffering also often serve as vehicles to redemption or moral growth. This is true in Richard Wright’s novel Native Son, in which the main character, Bigger, only realizes the motivation behind his violent crimes after he is caught and doomed to execution. Bigger’s whole life has been spent suffering under the thumb of a “superior” white society, limited in what he could achieve from the start because he was black. The anger and resentment against the forces oppressing him build up and manifest themselves in violence against his friends, his girlfriend, and the daughter of the white man who employs him. The murders he commits empower him and give his life meaning for the first time, and he feels little guilt as a result. Before the end of the novel, though, he realizes that his behavior is a direct result of the racism he has experienced, and that equality is something to be strived for. Rather than defying the status quo, Bigger’s actions contribute to the cycle of racism by reaffirming the fears whites have of blacks. It is only by acting on his frustration that Bigger comes to realize the cause for them, and he finally feels remorse. Suffering is a key theme in literature because it unlocks the ethical possibilities of almost any literary text. Literature nurtures the reader’s ethical awareness and compassionate faculty with characters who may be quite different from the reader but inspire affinity and sympathy nonetheless. The emotional and intellectual responses to these characters’ suffering help increase a reader’s awareness of what is possible, and inherent, in this world—that is, suffering caused by others or by institutions. Literature
112â•…â•… survival depicting suffering also inspires hope and confidence in the resilience of the human spirit. In most stories, suffering is temporary and usually resolved by the end, even if the resolution is simply death or justice served for those who have suffered. Literature involving suffering, then, is often true to life, in that it portrays suffering as inevitable and sometimes inexplicable, but often endured and overcome. See also Bradford, William: Of Plymouth Plantation; Cather, Willa: O Pioneers!; Cisneros, Sandra: Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor: Crime and Punishment; Edward, Jonathan: “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”; Faulkner, William: Light in August; Greene, Graham: Heart of the Matter, The; Haley, Alex, and Malcolm X: Autobiography of Malcolm X, The; Heller, Joseph: Catch-22; Hersey, John: Hiroshima; Kafka, Franz: Metamorphosis, The; O’Connor, Flannery: W ise Blood; Orwell, George: Nineteen Eighty-Four; Paton, Alan: Cry, the Beloved Country; Pirandello, Luigi: Six Characters in Search of an Author; Shakespeare, William: King Lear; Swift, Jonathan: Modest Proposal, A; Voltaire: Candide. FURTHER READING Bending, Lucy. The Representation of Bodily Pain in Late Nineteenth-Century English Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000. Noble, Marianne. The Masochistic Pleasures of Sentimental Literature. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000. Nussbaum, Martha C. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. Scarry, Elaine. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
Kristy Cerullo
survival
As with any thematic approach to literary study, consideration of the role of survival in literature requires an acknowledgement of the ever-evolving nature of the theme itself. Of primary importance, then, is recognizing that at different times, in differ-
ent places, and to different people, the word survival has taken on myriad different meanings. Our very understanding of the term fluctuates. Centuries before the printing press, when written texts were far less common, oral transmission was often utilized as a means of relaying a text, thus literally tying the survival of texts to the living, breathing carriers thereof. The fate of people and texts were parallel. Numerous works, including Beowulf (Anonymous), when eventually recorded, sustained damage or were lost or consumed by fire. Therefore, concomitant to examining survival in literature, we have also to acknowledge the necessary survival of literature, an issue which, even with the technological advances that have taken place over the epochs, is again presenting itself. Literature, of course, cannot be without language, and this basic concern is not lost when we consider the founding documents of the English language. Early Anglo-Saxon pieces such as Bede’s Caedmon’s Hymn (ca. seventh century) are, in and of themselves, testaments to a fledgling language struggling for its very existence. Works like Bede’s faced an uphill battle against the preeminence of Latin, a language to which most deferred due to its association with the church. Hence, the survival of any language is, in and of itself, the survival of familiar ideas and expressions, of connective provincialism. The early forms of English thus served as a sort of cultural conduit to crude patriotism. Correspondingly, the texts that utilize these forms concern themselves often with defense and survival, whether focusing on the tribe or on the nation-state. The Arthurian legend serves as an early example of literature concerned with survival beyond merely that of the individual, as does Sir Gawain and the Green Knight centuries later (although as Gawain’s head is literally at stake, individual survival is not entirely dismissed). Given the ties between the church and Western states, especially since the rise of Christianity, the intermingling of religion, the state, and the texts that carried their respective messages was of the utmost importance. The middle of the second millennium in particular saw monumental struggles between Catholics and the newly emergent Protestants for control of the hearts, minds, and truly the states
survivalâ•…â•… 113 and texts of Europe. The inception of the printing press in the 15th century facilitated the transmission of Martin Luther’s and John Calvin’s iconoclastic Protestant ideas and encouraged vernacular translations, sentiments that clashed with Catholicism’s insistence on Latin. Both biblical translations deemed unacceptable and those propounding them were subject to destruction via fire, and thus, the survival of both people and texts were again aligned. Dynamic both politically and textually, this era saw Henry VIII’s refutation of papal authority and his subsequent founding of the Anglican church; Elizabeth I’s rise, rule, and promulgation of Protestantism; and the ascension of King James I and creation of his conservative new Bible. The boundaries of these disputes, however, were continually expanding, as the dictums of the early modern age insisted that to be prosperous at home meant being prosperous abroad, and that meant the maintaining of colonial empires. As the struggle of the dominant ideologies in Europe quickly spilled over into its ever-expanding imperial holdings abroad, different views on survival presented themselves. John Milton’s Paradise Lost applied the Christian mythos as a means of examining survival in new worlds—Eden for Adam and Eve, and Hell for Lucifer. Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels explored the notion that, sail where one may, survival—however one chooses to define it—is only ultimately possible through selfknowledge. Tales pouring back to Europe from the Western Hemisphere, including those of Cabeza de Vaca and John Smith, told harrowing tales of survival amid unfamiliar new environments. Captivity narratives such as Mary Rowlandson’s Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mary Rowlandson, further underscored the dangers incumbent upon usurpation-based foreign settlement. The attendant horrors of “progress” helped, over the course of time, to spawn the romantic movement. Writers such as William Wordsworth (see “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey”), John Keats, and Sir Walter Scott sought survival in and pined for a departed day that favored bucolic simplicity in tried locales over the ever-advancing technology utilized to conquer alien landscapes, cultures, and people.
But neither colonial exploitation nor its attendant cultural emphases would survive in the New World. Shortly after gaining independence, the United States produced its own literary examinations of just what it meant to survive. Early American writers—not merely those reproducing British fiction, but those with whom others identified the young country—such as James Fenimore Cooper, Washington Irving (see Sketchbook of Geoffrey Crayon, The), and Michel-Guillaume-Jean de Crèvecoeur deductively chronicled the survival of the state by examining parcels thereof: ostensibly, the small villages and hamlets ranging across the frontier and the manner in which they were configured, governed, and threatened. From a spiritual perspective, Calvinist notions of predestination, which seem to take away our ability to act on our own, became the target of more and more disdain, as Americans inundated with notions of new horizons leveled mounting attacks on what they believed to be the domineering beliefs of their forbears, a system that essentially attributed the nature of one’s soul’s survival to luck. Such is the nature of Emily Dickinson’s probing, almost haunted poetry; hers is unsatisfied verse, work permeated by restlessness, want, and a need for a new savior. Her yearning for something new was largely representative of the mid-19th-century atmosphere that gave way to a more liberal unitarianism and, finally, transcendentalism. Spearheaded by the disheartened Unitarian preacher Ralph Waldo Emerson and his 1836 essay “Nature,” transcendentalists advanced the idea that surviving and flourishing were merely functions of recognizing one’s own innate divinity, an endeavor undertaken not via the intermediary of a preacher or priest in a church house, but alone. Hence, although the number of transcendentalists within the United States never exceeded that of an infinitesimal minority, their legacy survives and is celebrated as integrally American due to the manner in which emphasis on individuality and independence mirror the country’s stated goals. For example, Walt Whitman’s “Song of Myself ” (see Leaves of Grass) is an inductive celebration of the nation-state as construed by each and every one of its respective constituent citizens and environs. His
114â•…â•… survival is truly poetry of inclusion, stressing both his spirit and body; by commemorating, rather than debasing his physicality, Whitman marvels at the manner in which matter only changes form, thereby ensuring its survival, be it as human, grass, or dirt beneath one’s boot soles. Henry David Thoreau took Whitman’s ebullience even further, specifically positing the wilderness as savior by writing in his essay “Walking” (1862) that “in wildness is the preservation of the world,” a sentiment that would come to serve as a mantra for environmentalists. The idealism of transcendentalism, however, would last only until the time of the Civil War, as national survival quickly advanced to the forefront of public consciousness. Slave narratives penned by Harriet Jacobs (Incidents in the Life of A Slave Girl, Written by Herself ) and Frederick Douglass (Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave), along with Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin, intensified the debate over slavery that threatened to destroy the country. Yet amid all the politics of division, the transcripts of Abraham Lincoln’s speeches reveal a president concerned, first and foremost, with the survival of the Union. In 1890, the American frontier was declared “closed,” thus effectively ending what had until then been the country’s most enduring myth: that of the West. Suddenly, the United States and her authors had to acknowledge the philosophical significance communicated by this spatial reality: There was, indeed, no more second chance. What remained was to turn back around and re examine the manner in which the continent had been settled. Furthermore, the Industrial Revolution and its attendant advances in transportation had shifted the American economy from agrarian to mechanized. This phenomenon, along with tough economic times following the war, facilitated the rise of naturalists like Theodore Dreiser (An American Tragedy) and Stephen Crane (The Open Boat), whose writing highlighted the manner in which survival now pertained more to getting along in bustling capitalist metropolises than on sun-drenched prairies. Modernists sought solace with this increasingly unrecognizable world. Willa Cather, F. Scott Fitzgerald, and William Faulkner all wrote eulogistically of a
country they were not certain they really knew. Jack Kerouac and Kurt Vonnegut followed suit. Postmodernism interrogated what surviving in the 20th century necessarily entailed. Most recently, however, the ecocritical movement, a critical literary approach aiming to treat nature, according to the scholar David Mazel, as if it were consequential has added further nuance to survival’s role in literature. Citing environmental degradation, including groundwater contamination, overuse of pesticides, deforestation, pollution, and global warming, authors (beginning ostensibly with Rachel Carson in Silent Spring [1962] and still gaining momentum from scholars like Glen Love) have stressed the seemingly rudimentary concept that the survival of literature—indeed, that of all art—is integrally dependent on the survival of an environment able to sustain humanity itself. This basic assumption refutes the postmodern maxim that there are no absolutes, and it emphasizes that the theme of survival in literature is a very fundamental one; indeed, as people and texts are paralleled, they share a similar fate. See also Bradbury, Ray: Fahrenheit 451; Defoe, Daniel: Robinson Crusoe; Dickens, Charles: Oliver Twist; Erdrich, Louise: Love Medicine; Tracks; Frank, Anne: Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl; Golding, William: Lord of the Flies; Gordimer, Nadine: Burger’s Daughter; Harte, Bret: “Outcasts of Poker Flats, The”; Hemingway, Ernest: Farewell to Arms, A; Kingston, Maxine Hong: Woman Warrior, The; Mukherjee, Bharati: Middleman and Other Stories, The; O’Brien, Tim: Going after Cacciato; Solzhenitsyn, Alexander: One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich; Steinbeck, John: Pearl, The; Tennyson, Alfred, Lord: In Memoriam A. H. H.; Wright, Richard: Native Son. FURTHER READING Dailey, Kate. “Literature of Survival: A Literature Class as a Place of Healing.” Teaching English in the TwoYear College 34, no. 2 (December 2006): 196–201. Mazel, David, ed. A Century of Early Ecocriticism. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2001.
David Visser
traditionâ•…â•… 115
tradition
Although most people today might think that the word tradition is a reference to things from the past that are fixed and therefore must be replicated, the English word tradition actually comes from the Latin infinitive tradere literally meaning “to hand across.” However, the same word frequently meant “to surrender.” The various meanings of the Latin tradere can also be found in Greek words that translate as “tradition.” In both languages, the idea of “tradition” is at once a handing on of customs, rituals, expectations, and methods of doing things outside of written documents and a rejection of such customs or even a betrayal of them. This doublesided meaning of the word, which gives a truer picture of what tradition actually is, can be traced throughout the Western literary canon. From the earliest examples of literary art, the issue of tradition can be seen. For example, in the Babylonian poem Gilgamesh, the goddess Ishtar is outraged that Gilgamesh dishonors her; to punish him, she sends a bull to destroy him. This early example of a god expecting “traditional” behavior from a human, and the human responding by breaking the tradition, sets the stage for conflict found in nearly all classical and biblical literature. Yet the idea of tradition implies an appeal to stability, an unchanging order of expectations and events that makes human life possible because tradition presumes that tomorrow will be more or less like today. If the breaking up of expectations is also part of the idea of tradition, then one may question when such rejection is warranted and when it will introduce chaos into ordinary life. This problem of tradition—knowing when to maintain it and when to reject it—is a subject for political philosophy. Plato’s dialogue The Republic is structured around an argument in three waves, each of which contradicts the argument presented up to that point. The establishment of a proposition that is then contradicted is very much like the idea of a word, custom, or ritual handed down and then rejected by another contradictory word, the basic meaning of tradition. According to Plato, the wise statesman is the one who knows when to maintain a political order and when to initiate a change that will cause the city to more closely resemble its ideal.
Thus, at the very beginnings of Western literature, in Gilgamesh and in The Republic, the idea of tradition contains both a thematic and a political meaning. A third meaning, of intertextuality, can also be seen in ancient literature: the relationship between an earlier writer and a later one. Intertextuality is the influence of a set of written signs on later literary productions; it is neither allusion, allegory, nor a collection of earlier sources but a transposition of elements found in earlier literature and “carried across” to later compositions to create something new. The best example of intertextuality is Virgil’s use of Homer in The Aeneid. Although The Aeneid is sometimes described as The Odyssey first and then The Iliad, with actions merely lifted from Homer, in fact Virgil’s transposition of elements found in Homer’s epics forces readers to reinterpret meanings and thereby imaginatively create new understandings from an epic poetic form that seems “traditional.” For example, the images on Achilles’ shield in The Iliad signify the meaning of the war from the Greek perspective: the city of war, governed by Apollo and Athena; the city of peace, centered on a human marriage, with no gods present; around them plowing, harvesting, dancing, and the ocean. In The Aeneid, the images on Aeneas’s shield also function as symbols of the meaning of the battle about to begin: Romulus and Remus; the Sabines; Manlius; Catiline; Julius Caesar; Augustus; and, in the center, the Battle of Actium, which ended the republic and established the Roman Empire. The implication is that these images represent the same civilizational values for the Romans as the cities of war and peace for the Greeks. Yet the changes in the images on Aeneas’s shield do more than merely fit a different plot; these changes affect the audience’s expectation of the meaning of symbol because the entire poem is meant to change their expectation of themselves and their situation after the civil war. Though both shields contain images important for each civilization, those on Aeneas’s shield have not happened yet as far as Aeneas himself is concerned, but the audience knows they have happened as they show the major events in Roman mythological history. The purpose of such double-sided representation is exactly what tradition, in the form
116â•…â•… tradition of intertextuality, does. The question Virgil raises for the characters within the story is whether their virtue will be enough to “spare the conquered and battle down the proud,” the rule of law given to Aeneas so that Rome may be founded. Will Aeneas be strong enough and wise enough to show the wisdom necessary for a true ruler of a great city, or will his desire for the past in Troy still affect his judgment? Because the images on the shield remind the audience of the glory of republican Rome, the question being asked of them is whether they have the strength and wisdom necessary to go forward into the imperial future in order to create, through their own practice of virtue, an even greater city than the one Aeneas founded. Can they go forward and not look back to the past, to “tradition”? Thus, in The Aeneid, Virgil combines the thematic and political meanings of tradition through intertextuality by changing the significance of an important literary symbol. In contrast to what has been handed down, these three actions—conflict, wisdom, and intertextuality—can be seen in later literature. In his book The Anxiety of Influence, the literary critic Harold Bloom attempts to describe the stages of change that take place as the ephebe (the younger artist) asserts his voice over the father (the precursor: the elder artist or the tradition). These are: clinamen, or poetic misreading; tessera, or antithetical completion—that is, finishing the misreading in a logical way; kenosis, a turn away or break from the logical implications of the precursor; demonization, an inspiration derived from the ephebe’s reaction to the precursor, but not contained in it; ascesis, the solitude derived from a movement toward a completed vision; and apophrades, the revisionary image held up to its precursor. Although Bloom’s language derives from Neoplatonism and gnosticism, his description follows the classical tradition as shown above. An earlier critic, T. S. Eliot, also describes the relationship between a new work of literary art and its predecessors in his essay “Tradition and the Literary Talent” (1919). Eliot shows the necessary interaction between a new work and the context in which it appears. For him, the new work is accepted as literary because it fits into the context of which it is a part; in turn, because it is a literary work of
art, the new work changes readers’ understanding of the entire tradition by its refiguring of the whole context. Unlike Bloom’s esoteric description, Eliot’s understanding of the literary tradition adds a new component to the term tradition by showing that tradition itself is constantly changing and unstable. In other words, the “tradition” of literary tradition is the constant production of new works added to the canon. The critic must develop the wisdom to decide which new works of art deserve to move the tradition forward and which do not rise to that level. One question that Eliot’s essay raises is, of course, what is meant by a literary tradition. As we have seen, authors read earlier authors and derive inspiration and innovations from them. The rejection of both subject matter and form creates new subject matter and form for new audiences. The texts that make up this development are called a “tradition” as well. Thus, every linguistic group has some sort of literary tradition, whether oral or written, by which stories give meaning to experience. The particular groupings for literary traditions can be national (English, German, Chinese), formal (epic, tragic, comic, lyric, narrative, poetic, dramatic), or periodic (ancient, medieval, modern.) Within each of these groupings are particularities of form, language, subject matter, worldview, and so on, which identify the work as part of its “tradition” even though, as discussed above, each work will also be unique because of its rejection of some aspect of its tradition. The example of Virgil’s changing Homer is part of the classical tradition, which in turn forms the basis of Western literary tradition, but there are many more. In our global environment, the dynamic meaning of tradition is perhaps more important than ever, for authors writing in their national “traditions” are now borrowing from each other at a very rapid pace, producing a literary environment that in time may change our understanding of literature itself. For example, postcolonial literature borrows from European models but adds native experience and forms into that tradition; Salman Rushdie is perhaps the best-known writer in this tradition. See also Alexie, Sherman: Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistf ight in Heaven, The; Alvarez, Julie: How the García Girls Lost Their Accents;
violenceâ•…â•… 117 Aristophanes: Frogs, The; Browning, Robert: “My Last Duchess”; Dickens, Charles: Christmas Carol, A; Dreiser, Theodore: American Tragedy, A; DuBois, W. E. B.: Souls of Black Folk, The; Eliot, T. S.: Waste Land, The; Emerson, Ralph Waldo: “Divinity School Address, The”; Erdrich, Louise: Tracks; Euripides: Medea; Faulkner, William: Light in August; Sound and the Fury, The; Forster, E. M.: Room with a View, A; Jackson, Shirley: “Lottery, The”; Kingston, Maxine Hong: Woman Warrior, The; Momaday, N. Scott: House Made of Dawn; Way to Rainy Mountain, The; Naipaul, V. S.: House for Mr. Biswas, A; Reed, Ishmael: Mumbo Jumbo. FURTHER READING Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Booth, Wayne C. Critical Understanding: The Powers and Limits of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979. Eliot, T. S. “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” Contemporary Literary Criticism. Edited by Robert Con Davis and Ronald Schleifer. New York: Longman, 1994, 27–33. Maritain, Jacques. Creative Intuition in Art and Poetry. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1953. Perl, Jeffrey M. The Tradition of Return: The Implicit History of Modern Literature. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Lylas Rommel
violence
The term violence originates from the Latin violentia, meaning vehemence, which in turn implies an intense force. Etymologically, “violence” is akin to “violate” and thus is suggestive of damage and destruction that would characterize a violent storm or a traumatic experience such as rape, terrorism, or war. In its primary sense, therefore, violence denotes injury and also violation involving people or property. Though the concept of violence has always intrigued philosophers, psychologists, and literary artists, it is only in the 20th century that it has
gained currency in most cultural discourses. Perhaps this is owing to the exponential increase in the incidence of violence in the modern era, to the unprecedented carnage the world has witnessed in the course of the century, and to the emergence of crusaders of nonviolence such as Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. Beyond defining what violence is, social thinkers have lately turned their attention to its moral and cultural justifiability as a means to achieve personal, social, or political ends. While the concept of violence itself has undergone considerable philosophical analyses since ancient times, thus far there has been no consensus about its precise character. Simply put, violence is the overt physical manifestation of force on individuals, groups, or nations. Its definition, however, has been continually evolving with an increasing philosophical interest that goes beyond its overtly physical manifestations to more covert psychological and institutional practices. Broadly speaking, racism, sexism, economic exploitation, and ethnic and religious persecution are all possible sources of violence involving constraints that abuse people psychologically, if not physically. Philosophers also disagree on the moral and political justifiability of employing violence to achieve personal or social ends. While some thinkers view violence to be inherently wrong (e.g., murder), others defend it. The philosophical positions rationalizing violence tend to focus on ends that outweigh the evils of injury or violation involved. Conversely, proponents of nonviolence challenge the claims of advocates of violence, citing the misery and mayhem it brings about. Significant philosophical debates on violence include the French philosopher Georges Sorel’s Reflections on Violence (1908). In this text, Sorel worked with Karl Marx’s ideas on the proletariat, or the working class, and their ability to overthrow the middle class. By advocating violent general strikes, Sorel sought to inaugurate a class warfare against the state and capitalistic industrialists. The political theorist Hannah Arendt’s On Violence (1970) is another landmark treatise on 20th-century apologists for violence from a New Left perspective. Arendt concedes that violence can be justified only in defense against perceived threats to life, when it does not exceed necessity and its ends are patently
118â•…â•… violence positive. Drawing on notions of power developed by the French philosopher Michel Foucault, Newton Garver’s essay “What Violence Is” (1975) includes covert, psychological, and institutional forms of violence in declaring, “Any institution which systematically robs certain people of rightful options generally available to others does violence to those people” (420). Despite his sympathies with nonviolence as a stance, Garver does not advocate it as a viable social goal and posits that conflicts between nations may be minimized but not always eliminated. Obviously, thinkers differ in their approach to defining violence and continue to examine its apocalyptic manifestation in contemporary times. The problem of violence has also been of considerable interest to psychologists. Sigmund Freud was the first to diagnose the origins of neurosis, including violent behavior in human subjects. According to Freudian psychoanalysis, repression of the instinctual id leads to the “psychopathology of everyday life,” which in turn makes violent behavior commonplace. Likewise, Herbert Marcuse’s Eros and Civilization (1955) combines Freudian and Marxist theories to undercut the cultural codes that overdetermine and repress human psychology and sexuality, resulting in deviant tendencies. Following the psychoanalytic paradigms of repression, the complexity of human violence has been studied by modern psychiatrists such as James Gilligan in Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic (1996). Asserting that “violence, like charity begins at home” (5), he demonstrates how home as a microcosm reflects the cultural and historic macrocosm in which violence thrives. While he celebrates civilization as the greatest blessing of humanity, Gilligan condemns its “tragic flaw—the violence it stimulates” (267). He attributes violence in humans to a life bereft of love, either from without (resulting in feelings of rejection) or from within (resulting in shame). Thus, both these deficiencies are an outcome of the patriarchal structure of civilization that assigns codified and often repressive roles to each of the sexes, reinforcing traditional ideas of honor and dishonor, pride and shame. For psychoanalysts from Freud to Gilligan, violence remains a disturbing subject whose origin as well as cure lies within the complex cultural network that fashions human subjects.
Owing to its omnipresence and the human mind’s obsession with it, violence has had ubiquitous representation, from cave paintings to the contemporary television drama The Sopranos. Beginning with epic narratives like The Mahabharata, the Homeric verses, and Beowulf (Anonymous), among others, literature has always attempted to represent violence as a trope for relationships of power and domination. In many respects, Western literature, ranging from Sophocles’ Oedipus the King (429 b.c.), the biblical stories of Cain and Abel, Dante’s Inferno (14th century), William Shakespeare’s King Lear (1608), and Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick (1851), seeks to define itself by the tragedy arising from human violence. For most 20th-century artists, violence, ranging from the destruction of large-scale warfare to individual crimes of murder, rape, and abuse, is an inevitable aspect of their visions. Unable to accept a fallen world, modernist writers often employ destructive violence as the central motif in their works. For instance, the poetry of Sylvia Plath and John Wain attempts to discern the sources and effects of modern violence culminating in anger, frustration, despair, and even suicide. For some modern poets, however, violence has provided an ironic source of creativity and change, a view articulated by William Butler Yeats in poems like “The Second Coming” and “Easter 1916.” Critics generally attribute the predominance of violence in modern literature to both its sensational appeal and its potential to shock readers, leading them to question their beliefs. Critics also emphasize the historical significance of violence in the period following World War II, when poets and novelists bemoaned a world mired in conflict, and in which aggression threatened to destroy all humane qualities. The Holocaust has been a common subject with American literary artists ranging from Sylvia Plath to Saul Bellow. Anne Frank: The Diary of A Young Girl (1947) is a significant Holocaust document on the experiences of a war victim during the German occupation of the Netherlands during World War II. Other postwar novels, such as George Orwell’s dystopian Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) condemn totalitarianism in an essentially meaningless world. Likewise, Kurt Vonnegut’s deeply pessimistic vision pervades his novels, including Player Piano
violenceâ•…â•… 119 (1952) and Slaughterhouse-Five (1969), which portray the violent decay of the modern world. Racial violence is apparent in novels like Richard Wright’s Native Son (1940) and Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye (1970). The universality of women’s experience of sexual violence has provided grounds for feminist contributions from writers such as Margaret Atwood and Joyce Carol Oates. With the close of the 20th century, imagistic representation of violence in all forms of media has become commonplace. Films, television, art, and print media are saturated with images of familial violence involving women and children; issues of community violence directed toward ethnic and minority groups; the practice of institutional violence in workplace, schools, hospitals, police and law enforcement agencies; and incidents of state violence, such as the repression and surveillance practices after the September 11, 2001, destruction of the World Trade Center in the United States, the legitimation of violence through state support witnessed in the communal riots in Gujarat, and the Nandigram massacre in West Bengal, India. Though the media plays an active role in recording, portraying, disseminating, and reflecting on violence, its methods and intentions are often suspect because the politics influencing it may engender newer forms of violence. Plagued by violence, the contemporary era views nonviolence as a redeeming idea and the need of the hour. Though the history of nonviolence as a religious or philosophical doctrine has been traced as far back as the Chandogya Upanishad of ancient Hinduism, the Chinese Tao Te Ching, the Bible, and the early Christian prophets, the dramatic advent of nonviolence as a favored alternative position occurred in the recent past with Mohandas Gandhi’s “Satyagraha” campaigns for India’s independence in the 1920s, and the struggle for racial justice in the United States during the 1960s. Contemporary discourses on nonviolence not only advocate traditional ideals such as love and tolerance to protect both human and animal rights; they also focus, paradoxically, on the use of violence to achieve peace through enforcement and prosecution. Besides, the modern practitioners of nonviolence seek to strengthen the role of nongovernmental organizations that pro-
mote education to prevent violence. Significantly, pacifist propaganda, too, is embedded in the matrix of human civilization and continues to be a cause worth fighting for in a world with ever-escalating incidences of violence. See also Albee, Edward: Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?; Bambara, Toni Cade: Salt Eaters, The; Conrad, Joseph: Heart of Darkness; Dickens, Charles: Tale of Two Cities, A; Grass, Günter: Tim Drum, The; Hesse, Herman: Steppenwolf; Jackson, Shirley: “Lottery, The”; Jacobs, Harriet: Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself; Knowles, John: Separate Peace, A; Kozinski, Jerzy: Painted Bird, The; Melville, Herman: Billy Budd, Sailor; Morrison, Toni: Song of Solomon; O’Connor, Flannery: “Good Man Is Hard to Find, A”; Pope, Alexander: Rape of the Lock, The; Roth, Philip: American Pastoral; Shakespeare, William: Hamlet; Henry IV, Part I; Twain, Mark: Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, A; Walker, Alice: Color Purple, The; Williams, Tennessee: Streetcar Named Desire, A. FURTHER READING Arendt, Hannah. On Violence. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1970. Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books, 1977. Freud, Sigmund. Psychopathology of Everyday Life. Classics in the History of Psychology. Available online. URL: http://psychclassics.asu.edu/Freud/ Psycho/. Accessed March 17, 2010. Garver, Newton. “What Violence Is.” In Today’s Moral Problems, edited by R. Wasserstrom, New York: Macmillan, 1975. Gilligan, James. Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic. New York: Vintage Books, 1996. Marcuse, Herbert. Eros and Civilization. New York: Vintage Books, 1955. Miller, William Robert. Nonviolence: A Christian Interpretation. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1964. Sorel, Georges. Reflections on Violence. Translated by T. E. Hulme and J. Roth. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1950.
Srirupa Chatterjee
120â•…â•… work
work
The concept of work is notoriously difficult to define. The payment of wages cannot be the sole criterion in determining whether an action counts as work, since men and women throughout history have often labored without compensation. The physical efforts expended by a slave in ancient Greece, for example, or by a homemaker today certainly qualify as work even though neither worker would be paid. Additionally, an individual can undertake many demanding tasks with little or no hope of payment: A would-be writer might spend weekends working diligently on his novel, while a hobbyist could spend evenings in her workshop making furniture that only her family will use. These examples might suggest that physical or mental exertion in pursuit of a goal, whether paid or not, is sufficient to qualify an activity as work. But not all purposeful action—exercise and recreational sports, for example—is considered work. While it is true that we call vigorous exercise a “workout,” a sense of fairness suggests that there is an essential difference between lifting weights in a gym and loading boxes onto the back of a truck. Many people detest work and avoid it whenever possible, but these subjective attitudes are useless in forming a definition (such as “work is activity we find unpleasant”) since just as many people find pleasure in their work; “workaholics,” in fact, find labor more attractive than leisure. Keith Thomas, editor of The Oxford Book of Work, provides a definition that, while necessarily limited, covers many activities that we recognize as work: “Work has an end beyond itself, being designed to produce or achieve something; it involves a degree of obligation or necessity, being a task that others set us or that we set ourselves; and it is arduous, involving effort and persistence beyond the point at which the task ceases to be wholly pleasurable” (xiv). We might abbreviate this definition to say that work is productive, necessary, and difficult. Work, so broadly defined, has long been a theme in literature, but rarely is it the main theme of literature written before the 18th century. The work done by soldiers—who labor to achieve victory or exact revenge, engage their tasks under obligation, and persist under the most unpleasant conditions—is one of the subjects of both Homer’s The Iliad and Virgil’s The Aeneid. Mythical heroes frequently
endure difficult tasks: Hercules accomplishes 12 labors to atone for killing his children and later joins Jason in his arduous search for the golden fleece. These battles, punishments, and quests, however, differ from what we normally consider work, such as toiling in fields and households. Ancient writers, like their counterparts in philosophy, would have considered such manual laborers unworthy of serious attention. In fact, the negative attitude toward manual labor is echoed in Genesis 3:16–19, where hard work is depicted as punishment for humanity’s sinfulness in the Garden. Adam’s transgression earned men a lifetime of “painful toil,” while Eve’s earned women “pains in childbearing.” After the Fall, humanity would survive only through very hard labor. When laborers do show up in classical literature, they are often little more than stock characters, such as shepherds, used to idealize rural life, a literary custom continued in medieval literature, where workers serve primarily as allegorical symbols meant to encourage humility, patience and devotion to Christian principles. In The Canterbury Tales, Geoffrey Chaucer’s Plowman, “a true worker .╯.╯. living in peace and perfect charity,” exemplifies that tradition, but unlike his predecessors and many of his contemporaries, Chaucer describes his working characters in highly realistic terms. His company of pilgrims, all of them identified by their occupations (even the Wife is a professional of sorts), are drawn in exquisite and differentiating detail. With Chaucer, workers in literature have faces and personalities. Although the tales’ prologue includes a number of themes regarding work (our words should be matched by our actions; the most honorable labor is done in the service of humanity), the poem is not about work. Work as a central subject in literature was still very rare at this time, and while writers after Chaucer were more inclined to portray workers as individuals rather than as symbols, the portraits were often dismissive and unflattering. Writers, who tended to come from the educated and moneyed classes, seldom looked with much empathy on manual laborers. In the 18th and 19th centuries, writers in England and America begin to devote more attention to the lives and experience of workers (maids, shep-
workâ•…â•… 121 herds, stable hands, miners, factory workers, and so on). One cause for the foregrounding of work is a change in attitude toward the nature and value of work, which came to be seen as both a blessing and a curse. For perhaps the most prominent philosopher on labor, Karl Marx, work could be a liberating activity. Freely chosen productive labor would lead to self-realization and fulfillment for both the individual worker and the laboring community. A farmer’s well-tended fields reflected his discipline and knowledge, and in working those fields, the farmer might feel a sense of connectedness to the land and a sense of purpose in providing food for his family and neighbors. People who worked the land collectively would also see their social cooperation mirrored in the results of their work. This concept of self-realization was important for Marx primarily in how it is violated in work that is not freely chosen, especially in work done under capitalism, in which self-realization and fulfillment are replaced by what Marx termed alienation. Alienation is especially evident when human beings are forced to sell the only thing they own— their labor—in a system imposed upon them by those who own the means of production (land, factories, machinery, etc.). A migrant worker on a huge corporate farm hardly sees her best qualities reflected in the backbreaking, miserable, monotonous work she does; she may be scorched by the sun, exhausted by the pace and physical movement, unable to talk to her fellow workers during her shift, and paid so little that even the crop she picks would be a luxury. In Marx’s terms, she is alienated from nature, her community, the product of her labor, and especially from herself. Her work satisfies no intrinsic need or desire; she works only to satisfy other needs. In contemporary terms, she might say of her work, “This is not who I am.” It is easy to see how a production-line worker or anyone toiling for low wages in a dangerous, tedious job may be considered alienated from himself, but even an office worker suffering through a dehumanizing job that strips him of his identity and makes him feel out of sorts can be considered a member of Marx’s exploited, alienated class. These two concepts—the blessings of work as a path toward self-realization and the curse of toiling
in an exploitative system—provide the themes for many works of literature written in the mid-19th century and later. Whether a work of literature includes only passing mention of workers and the laboring life or takes work as its central topic and theme, it might examine any number of specific concepts: the struggles of immigrant, African-American, and female workers; the dangers of manual labor and the effects of work on the bodies and psyches of laborers; the way in which work infiltrates and affects domestic life and leisure; the ethical and moral issues associated with slavery and with other forced labor; the camaraderie and interdependence in the working community; the struggle to unionize and the battle between collective and individual values; the personal and psychological rewards of freely chosen labor; and the degree to which a worker is alienated from himself, his work, his community, and the natural world. And while some popular literature, treating useful toil as empowering, preaches a gospel of self-improvement and celebrates the work ethic of committed laborers, much serious literature centers on the exploited worker and the miserable conditions endured by individual workers and by the working class. The so-called industrial novel, a genre that includes works by Elizabeth Gaskell (North and South) and Charles Dickens, depicts the harsh conditions endured by factory workers in Victorian England. Thomas Hardy reveals in Jude the Obscure the many forces that appear to be allied against members of the working class. Poverty and exploitation among workers has drawn the attention of numerous American writers, including Herman Melville; Walt Whitman; Rebecca Harding Davis (Life in the Iron Mills); and, perhaps most famously, Upton Sinclair, whose The Jungle exposed the poverty, injustice, and unsanitary conditions of life in the slaughterhouses of Chicago. The “proletarian novel” of the 1930s in America promoted Marx’s notion that only a socialist revolution could bring about a system conducive to selfactualizing labor, while John Dos Passos (U.S.A. trilogy) saw nothing to be gained under socialism, a system as destructive of individual identity as capitalism. In The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck strikes a few astounding notes of hopefulness
122â•…â•… work that result from collective values and individual resilience. And without overlooking the profound damage done by Willy Loman’s personal lapses in judgment and morals, readers of Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman cannot help recognizing that his status as a lowly worker in a coldhearted alienating business has contributed greatly to his downfall. Although few writers today take work as the main setting or plot of their stories, the theme has by no means disappeared from literature. In addition, scholars interested in cultural studies, labor studies, and feminist theory have in the past few decades unearthed the literary accomplishments of many laborers whose poems, songs, stories, and essays provide an insider’s look at the world of work. And the plight of the struggling employee continues to be told, often very comically, in film and television. See also Amis, Kingsley: Lucky Jim; Chekhov, Anton: Seagull, The; Dickens, Charles: Oliver Twist; Emerson, Ralph Waldo: “SelfReliance”; Frost, Robert: poems; Gaines,
Ernest J.: Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, The; Haley, Alex, and Malcolm X: Autobiography of Malcolm X, The; Hawthorne, Nathaniel: “Birth-mark, The”; McCullers, Carson: Heart Is a Lonely Hunter, The; Melville, Herman: Billy Budd, Sailor; Orwell, George: Animal Farm; Solzhenitsyn, Alexander: One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich; Thoreau, Henry David: Walden; Washington, Booker T.: Up from Slavery; Whitman, Walt: Leaves of Grass. FURTHER READING Hapke, Laura. Labor’s Text: The Worker in American Fiction. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2001. Marx, Karl. The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and the Communist Manifesto. New York: Prometheus Books, 1988. Thomas, Keith, ed. The Oxford Book of Work. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
James Wallace
part ii
Authors and Works A–E `
ACHEBE, CHINUAâ•… Anthills of the Savannahâ•… (1987)
different forms, but he also holds out the possibility of an alternative, more inclusive and hopeful vision. Kerry Vincent
The Nigerian writer Chinua Achebe’s first novel, Things Fall Apart, published in 1958, is considered by many to be the prototype for modern African literature. In June 2007, his monumental standing in the world of African letters was recognized when he was awarded the prestigious Man Booker Prize for fiction. Many of the themes introduced in that novel, such as colonialism, language, the clash between tradition and modernity, various forms of inequality and corruption, and the abuse of power are important issues that Achebe (b. 1930) has continued to develop and probe in his other novels, including his last to date, Anthills of the Savannah. His belief that the primary responsibility of the African writer should be to educate the people is clearly evident in the way in which he portrays social injustice in many of its manifestations. In Anthills of the Savannah, Achebe takes aim at a corrupt postcolonial African regime and shows how government self-interest and power politics isolate those who should be working on behalf of the people. This corruption, the novel demonstrates, spreads and repeats itself in various ways throughout society in forms such as the wide gulf between the rich and the poor or the educated and the illiterate, and between males and females. In the novel, Achebe scrutinizes unequal power relations as they are practiced in their
Gender in Anthills of the Savannah
The opening chapters of Anthills of the Savannah introduce readers to a country that is shaped and defined by male power politics. By the novel’s closing chapter, however, these aggressive and cynical male voices have given way to the inclusive and reconciliatory voices of female characters. This shift in emphasis reflects a key recognition in the novel of the need to reconfigure assumptions of male domination that are deeply embedded in this traditionally patriarchal society. Achebe conveys this need for more equitable gender relations particularly through the gradual development of Ikem, a key male character, and through the presence of Beatrice, an equally important female character. During a conversation with Chris, in which he is attempting to explain his relationship with Sam and Ikem, Beatrice interrupts him to exclaim, “Well, you fellows, all three of you, are incredibly conceited. The story of this country, as far as you are concerned, is the story of the three of you .╯.╯.” This “story,” of course, is exclusively male and singularly elitist, and it is one that Achebe examines during the course of the novel. The correlation of institutional power with male dominance is perhaps best articulated
123
124â•…â•… Achebe, Chinua through Sam’s derisive and indulgent quip, “African Chiefs are always polygamists.╯.╯.╯. Polygamy is for Africa what monotony is for Europe.” Sam’s remark reflects a complacent chauvinism. Other male figures besides the politically and morally corrupt character of Sam make equally patronizing and sexist remarks, and these are intensified by the more vicious physical violence toward women encountered with the attempted rape of a young woman by a police sergeant near the end of the novel and Beatrice’s remembering that when she was growing up, her mother was very often beaten by her father. Even the worldly Ikem is associated with various forms of female abuse, until he gradually gains insight into his biased assumptions. His detached interest in the violent beatings of a wife in a neighboring flat, or his own devaluation of women as only being useful as, in Beatrice’s words, “comforters,” mark Ikem as a product of a deeply embedded masculinist world view. With Beatrice’s guidance, however, he slowly comes to apprehend that women are “the biggest single group of oppressed people in the world .╯.╯. and the oldest,” who also have a potentially pivotal role to play in society. While Ikem’s girlfriend, Elewa, plays an important role in changing his attitude toward women, Beatrice acts as the catalyst for his dawning awareness. The tenuous status of females in this society is emphasized by one of the birth names she is given: Nwanyibuife, or, “A female is also something.” Despite growing up in a rigid patriarchal household where females were considered secondary (as her other name suggests), Beatrice manages to obtain a university education and fairly prominent social status with a mid-level government job, and throughout the novel her voice insists on the recognition of women as being equal to men. Through Beatrice, Achebe also draws a link between the traditional and the modern in order to suggest that the high esteem with which some females were held in the past has largely been forgotten in the present because of a male desire for power. Beatrice is repeatedly referred to as a prophetess and associated with Idemili, a powerful female goddess—if not displacing, then certainly disrupting the primacy of the male characters.
Beatrice’s ceremonial role carries into the present in the novel’s final chapter as she presides over the naming of Elewa’s new baby girl. In the absence of a male figure to conduct the ceremony, Beatrice improvises and leads a new ritual, and the female infant is given the name Amaechina, conventionally a boy’s name meaning “May-the-path-never-close,” and in direct contrast to the demeaning Nwanyibuife (“A female is also something”). This disregard for gender-specific names and for the customary forms of the ritual during the novel’s closing moments signals the possibility for a reshaping of traditional perceptions of gender roles that have ossified and been carried forward into the modern world. While it might be argued that Achebe idealizes the character of Beatrice, he does manage, nonetheless, to depict a female character who demands to be heard. As a result, the novel goes further than simply depicting gender conflict; it also attempts to offer a tentative alternative vision of a more equal society. Kerry Vincent
Oppression in Anthills of the Savannah
Almost midway through Anthills of the Savannah, Ikem Osiri exclaims that his friend Beatrice has forced him to think about “the nature of oppression—how flexible it must learn to be, how many faces it must learn to wear if it is to succeed again and again.” The many faces of oppression is a key theme in Achebe’s novel, which follows the rise and fall of a dictator in the fictional African country of Kangan, and references to separate coups (short for coup d’état, meaning the often violent overthrow of a government) near the novel’s opening and conclusion warn of its potential to resurface. Whereas the first coup brings His Excellency, Sam, to power, the second one brings about his death. In between, Sam’s two old friends, Ikem Osiri and Christopher Oriko, witness and become victims of Sam’s degeneration from a relatively well-meaning military officer to a dictator who will go to any lengths to realize his obsession with becoming president for life. Sam’s rebuke to Chris at the opening of the novel—“But me no buts, Mr Oriko!”—immediately reveals much about his character. While its unintentionally humorous clumsiness reflects something of Sam’s endearing lack of sophistication, its
Anthills of the Savannahâ•…â•… 125 impatient aggression marks someone who will allow no contradictions and tolerate no alternatives, nor accept any conditions that might seem to threaten his authority. His refusal to take counsel is further reinforced on the same page with his declaration, “Kabisa!,” a Swahili word that Achebe translates into English as “Finished.” As a result of Sam’s lack of political experience, the dubious means by which he has attained power, and the false adulation poured on him by sycophantic advisers, personal insecurities drive him to imagine subversive plots are being hatched against him. Sam’s paranoia leads him to curtail the freedom of the press by placing both the print and electronic media under government censorship and control, and to appoint a director of a secret police force (euphemistically called the Directorate of State Research) that restricts individual and community voices. For example, Sam forces Chris, his commissioner for information, to muzzle the dissenting views expressed by Ikem, the editor of the National Gazette. Following a speech that Ikem makes to students at the university, the government-controlled radio announces a series of manufactured charges against him and later describes his subsequent death while supposedly resisting arrest. After his own attempt to reason with Sam, Chris is perceived as a threat and is forced to go into hiding as the police hunt for him throughout the city. Eventually, he secretly flees the city, heading for the northern provinces by bus. Meanwhile, the legitimate concerns of a delegation from the drought-stricken northern Abazon Province are brushed aside as Sam refuses to meet with them, and he eventually has them placed in detention for supposedly plotting against the government. As the state-controlled oppression of individuals and groups accelerates, Sam’s physical presence recedes, suggesting just how out of touch he is and how much he has isolated himself from the people of Kangan. He last appears in chapter 11, the same chapter that concludes with a description of the arrest and, it is implied, torture, of the Abazon delegation. Sam’s physical absence from the scene reflects the need to speak out against oppression. Besides the dominant forms of oppression practiced by a dictatorial military government, Achebe
also introduces the equally destructive abuses of power caused by males against females, and by the privileged, educated classes against the less educated working classes. During the course of the novel, Chris and Ikem move from differing degrees of isolation—Chris has a “detached clinical interest” in the workings of the state, while Ikem confesses to finding a neighbor’s brutal beatings of his wife “satisfyingly cathartic”—to a greater awareness, sympathy, and even admiration for the oppressed. At one point in the novel, a creation myth is described in which Idemili, the daughter of the Almighty, is sent “to bear witness to the moral nature of authority by wrapping around Power’s rude waist a loincloth of peace and modesty.” In Anthills of the Savannah, Achebe not only presents a biting critique of power in its various forms and its capacity to abuse and oppress individuals, groups, and nations; he also reminds us of the urgent need to bear witness to its existence and act against it, if freedom from oppression is to be achieved. Kerry Vincent
Social Class in Anthills of the Savannah
In his first novel, Things Fall Apart, Achebe includes many proverbs, folktales, and rituals in order to reinforce his depiction of a rich and ancient traditional African society. He continues this practice in Anthills of the Savannah but incorporates a much wider variety of texts and registers, as a means of projecting his ideal vision of an inclusive and equitable postcolonial society that recognizes and acknowledges the legitimacy of diverse voices from different social classes, and not just those of a primarily male elite. As Chris, Ikem, and Beatrice are increasingly alienated from Sam’s manic exercise of power, they gradually become more attuned to the voices of the less privileged peasants and workers. The catalyst for the sequence of events that lead to Sam’s defeat and the deaths of Ikem and Chris is the visit by the delegation from Abazon, which very early in the novel highlights such oppositions as rural-urban, uneducated-educated, poor-rich, and traditional-modern. More than anyone, Ikem appreciates the integrity of this peasant class, even as he puzzles over how their values can be adapted to the modern world.
126â•…â•… Achebe, Chinua Ikem conveys his recognition of the disparity between social classes during a speech at the university that he entitles “↜‘The Tortoise and the Leopard—a political meditation on the imperative of struggle.’↜” This traditional story, first told to Ikem by the chief of the Abazon delegation, emphasizes the importance of resistance and of leaving a mark to act as inspiration for those who follow. Ikem, then, draws on and updates traditional folk wisdom to address an urban student body and challenge them to acknowledge his earlier insight that “It is the failure of our rulers to re-establish vital inner links with the poor and dispossessed of this country, with the bruised heart that throbs painfully at the core of the nation’s being.” Ikem’s challenge represents a culmination of his own recent awareness of the distance between the educated elite and the working poor and the peasants. His initial complacent belief in a kind of solidarity with the underclass is humorously enacted when he finds himself locked in a battle against a determined taxi driver during a traffic jam. Ikem wins the contest because he is not afraid to damage his already beaten-up car, but he subsequently comes to realize how petty his victory was when the taxi driver later finds him and apologizes for daring to challenge such an eminent figure. During their meeting, conducted in the largely working-class language of pidgin English, Ikem feels exhilaration over “this rare human contact across station and class,” but he wonders, nonetheless, about the huge divide between the privileged and the poor. A taxi driver also figures in Chris’s forced plunge into the world of the lower classes, a transformation that is realistically and figuratively conveyed by the worker’s clothing that he puts on as a disguise to help him negotiate roadblocks set up throughout the city. Chris also realizes that his own educated speech is now a liability, and his switch to pidgin reinforces his immersion in a class that he had previously taken for granted. He is only saved from detection by his taxi driver’s interventions, and once out of danger he announces, “To succeed as small man no be small thing.” Beatrice, too, learns some humility during the hunt for Chris, to the point where she is even able to recognize something of the unhappiness of Agatha,
her domestic worker, and to break down the rigid employer-employee relationship with the simple words, “I am sorry Agatha.” She is further humbled after recognizing the sacrifices made by a very poor family to shelter and protect Chris. Her concern for Chris and desire to be with him comes at the expense of the family’s own privacy, and her awareness of their generosity is partly what allows her to reassess her relationship with Agatha and recognize “the absurd raffle-draw that apportioned the destinies of post-colonial African societies.” In the novel’s final pages, Beatrice decodes Chris’s dying words, “The last green,” which alludes to just how tentative the assumed heights of the powerful elite really are, and she concludes, “This world belongs to the people of the world not to any little caucus, no matter how talented.” In light of Achebe’s scathing critique of the powerful, educated elite, it is certainly appropriate that he chooses to use pidgin English and give the novel’s final supportive and comforting words to the half-literate salesgirl, Elewa. Kerry Vincent
ACHEBE, CHINUAâ•… Things Fall Apartâ•… (1958)
In 1958, Chinua Achebe published Things Fall Apart, which depicts the tragic downfall of a strong African clansman faced with the budding presence of colonialism. Okonkwo, Achebe’s central character, represents a man tied to his clan’s culture; moreover, Okonkwo represents the essence of male vigor within the tribe as he strives to lead the clan with strength and stoicism, persistently avoiding the appearance of weakness. Yet Okonkwo’s strength falters under the weight of an ever-changing Africa when his family and his clan encounter a new way of living through the white man’s Christian religion. The first part of the novel centers on Okonkwo, his family, and the rituals of his tribe. Achebe depicts how Okonkwo’s relationships with his father, Unoka; his son, Nwoye; his daughter, Enzima; and Ikemefuna, a boy who calls Okonkwo father, all define Okonkwo’s identity. Despite his trials in the beginning of the novel, including his exile from the clan, the true test of Okonkwo’s strength comes
Things Fall Apartâ•…â•… 127 with the entrance of Mr. Brown, Reverend Smith, and the other white characters. As Christianity begins to spread through the clan, Okonkwo’s eldest son becomes a missionary, conflict arises between the clan and the government of the colonists, and Okonkwo’s desire to lead the clan results in violence as he kills a white man. Yet the tribe does not partake in his violence, and Okonkwo reacts by taking his own life. His tragic story probes into themes of heroism’s validity, the solidity of tradition, and the relationship between an individual and a society in flux. Lindsay Cobb
Heroism in Things Fall Apart
In Things Fall Apart, Chinua Achebe immediately asserts the main character Okonkwo’s status as a heroic figure. Okonkwo’s position as a pillar of strength throughout nine villages and “even beyond” solidifies his laudable identity. However, it is Okonkwo, more than any other character, who aims for self-definition as a hero—a hero defined by personal triumphs and masculinity. This definition problematizes the theme of heroism because Okonkwo’s definition of a hero lacks the substance to prevail in Achebe’s work. In fact, Okonkwo’s pursuit to attain extraordinary status as the leader of a healthy tribe occurs alongside the tribe’s own attempt to retain its strength against the threat of the white man’s government and religion. Okonkwo, indeed, represents the human embodiment of the failing strength of his tribe, Umuofia. As tensions between Umuofia and the white man’s society test Okonkwo’s greatness, his fear of failure and desire to succeed supersede his ability to thrive as a hero. Moreover, Okonkwo’s need to prove his masculinity serves as a catalyst to his inability to understand not only the world of the white man but the needs of his own tribe, thus resulting in his loss of heroism. Okonkwo’s definition of heroism exists primarily as an exact opposite to his father, Unoka. During his childhood, Okonkwo felt shame over his father’s status as an agbala, a term meaning both “woman” and “man without titles.” Okonkwo, as a result of his father’s idleness and gentleness, did not enter the world with prosperity; he had neither a barn nor a wife to inherit. Thus, even at a young age, he
endeavored to build a prosperous future—to achieve a heroic life—by representing everything his father did not. He therefore valued emotional strength and physical strength above all else, and he ruled his lands, wives, and children with a heavy hand. Yet this strength overextends into brutality when Okonkwo kills Ikemefuna, a boy who calls him father—an action that begins to damage Okonkwo’s heroic identity. Ikemefuna came under Okonkwo’s care after Umuofia helped make a settlement with a neighboring tribe, and his presence brought a subtle shift in Okonkwo’s house. Despite the fact that Okonkwo did not show Ikemefuna any outward affection, for to him such affection would denote weakness, he develops great affection for the boy. Nevertheless, when the tribe decides that Ikemefuna must die after three years, Okonkwo’s hardness overshadows his ability to gently love a new son. In order to not seem weak in front of his peers, he kills the boy with his own hand. After Okonkwo’s decision to kill Ikemefuna, his status as the tribe’s hero seems to crumble. First, his close friend Obierika bemoans his action; then, at a tribal meeting, Okonkwo accidentally kills a 16-year-old boy, and for atonement he must leave the clan for seven years. This series of events eventually exposes the message Achebe folds into the relationships between fathers and sons—a message concerning heroism. Okonkwo’s great flaw, then, derives from his obdurate passion for strength and thus heroism. His zeal stems from his own disappointment in his father; moreover, this fervor damages his relationship with, first, his eldest son, Nyowe, and then his own clan. After Okonkwo kills Ikemefuna, Nyowe questions the clan’s practices, and his doubts fuel his decision to follow the new Christian religion. Nyowe’s departure from the clan marks an irrevocable gap between Nyowe and his father. When Okonkwo notices Nyowe’s growing interest in the Christian faith, he reprimands his son through violence and threatens to kill him. Though Okonkwo does not kill Nyowe, this exchange leads to Nwoye’s permanent departure and Okonkwo’s own perception of his son as degenerate and effeminate. He extends this perception to his own tribe when he feels that they will not stand up against the ever-growing presence
128â•…â•… Achebe, Chinua of the white man and his religion. This view eventually results in Okonkwo’s separation from the tribe when he kills a court messenger, thus choosing to act alone—to act with his definition of heroism, rather than the clan’s. Yet this act does not result in heroic triumph, and Okonkwo realizes that his reliance on strength and manliness has overreached the best of his intentions. Thus, as he chooses to kill himself, he dies a death which his clansmen cannot sanctify, alone and unheralded like his father, and he loses his potential to be remembered as a hero of Umuofia. Lindsay Cobb
Individual and Society in Things Fall Apart
From the initial pages of his novel Things Fall Apart, Chinua Achebe makes it clear that the main character, Okonkwo, represents an individual deeply aligned with his society. Okonkwo’s strength and presumed heroism within the novel derive from his ability to fully accept the clan’s culture and follow faithfully in its traditions. Yet as his society begins to change with the expansion of colonialism in Africa, Okonkwo’s relationship with his society begins to evolve—and eventually fall apart. Achebe’s novel investigates the complex relationship between an individual and his or her society; moreover, it reveals the damaging strains this relationship undergoes when faced with drastic and inevitable changes. Part 1 and part 2 of the novel define Okonkwo as a follower of his clan, Umuofia. Regardless of the painful actions the traditions of the clan require of him, he never wavers in his devotion. In spite of his high regard for Ikemefuna, a young boy sent to live with his family after a clan dispute, he accepts Umuofia’s declaration that Ikemefuna—who calls him father—must die. Later, after he accidentally murders a member of the clan, Okonkwo dutifully allows Umuofia to burn his home, and he leaves for a seven-year exile in his motherland. Nevertheless, signs of his fierce independence pepper the story. He does not dispute the clan’s decision to kill Ikemefuna, but he goes so far as to kill the boy himself to show his own strength as a clansman. Here, then, Okonkwo tries to set himself apart from the clan as an individual member. His endeavor to prove himself as Umuofia’s strongest member shows itself dis-
tinctly in this moment, and it is this endeavor that contributes to his tragic separation from the clan. As the violence mounts between the colonists and Umuofia in part 3, Okonkwo’s frustration with the clan’s lack of action increases. He does not understand why Umuofia does not act aggressively against the changes the colonists wish to impose on their society. Moreover, he wishes the clan to remain dedicated to its traditions and not bend to the potential of change. Thus, he comes to the novel’s final clan meeting with the goal of convincing Umuofia to fight back against the colonists. He declares to his friend Obierika that if the clan does not fight, he will fight alone—and he does. Yet after he kills one of the colonists and realizes that the clan will not follow his actions, Okonkwo forsakes his society and chooses to commit suicide. Though he had chosen to act alone, he cannot stand to live alone—apart from his clan. Umuofia, however, cannot honor his death because suicide represents an abomination and a sin against the gods. Thus, not only does Okonkwo choose to act independently of his society, his society—his clan—must spurn him as well. In this moment, Okonkwo represents an individual deeply disconnected from his society. Yet Achebe does not conclude the novel with Okonkwo’s death. In the closing paragraph, the narrator explains that the commissioner of the colonists plans to write a book entitled The Pacification of the Primitive Tribes of the Lower Niger. He first considers writing a chapter concerning Okonkwo, but then he determines that a “reasonable” paragraph will suffice in order to tell Okonkwo’s story, which he witnessed firsthand. Achebe’s choice to end the novel with this information further complicates the relationship between an individual and society in a land beset with change, because this revelation starkly contrasts with Okonkwo’s decision to end his own life. Thus, the novel—which Achebe devotes primarily to the story of Okonkwo—may, in the hands of the colonizers, find itself reduced to one paragraph in the midst of many. Okonkwo loses his individuality and, despite his lifelong dedication to strength and thus fame, becomes a mere paragraph among others in his evolving society. While the commissioner decides to group Okonkwo deep within a community of stories, Okonkwo’s purely individual decisions lead
Things Fall Apartâ•…â•… 129 to his tragic death. The novel’s conclusion, therefore, represents an ironic truth concerning Okonkwo’s existence: Though he died putting his individual decisions above those of his community, the commissioner refuses to see his individuality as worthy of an entire novel or even a chapter—just a paragraph. Lindsay Cobb
Tradition in Things Fall Apart
In his novel Things Fall Apart, Chinua Achebe tragically illustrates the collision between tradition and change through the story of Okonkwo. Achebe’s main character represents a man devoted to his culture’s tradition. Yet his devotion does not yield to change, and he ultimately succumbs to his own unwillingness to accept the changes his clan faces with the arrival of the white man and Christianity. Achebe further complicates the novel’s perceptions of change and tradition by including characters that mirror and oppose Okonkwo’s attitude, such as Mr. Smith, whose own devotion to his culture exacerbates the hostile situation between the Christians and the clan leaders, including Mr. Brown and Akunna, who show the promise of respectfully discussing each culture’s varying traditions in a move toward peaceful change; and Obierika and Nwoye, who demonstrate the ability to question traditional customs. Achebe first asserts the dominance of tradition in the clan, Umuofia, by showing how steeped in convention Okonkwo and his family remain. The clan values strength; therefore, Okonkwo becomes the strongest. The clan values manliness; therefore, Okonkwo shuns all effeminate behavior. When the clan’s oracle declares that Ikemefuna, a boy who lived in Okonkwo’s home for years like a son, must die, Okonkwo follows dutifully and even uses his own hand to kill Ikemefuna in order to show his strength and dedication to the clan’s mores. Yet with the death of Ikemefuna also comes the first signs of doubt in Okonkwo’s eldest son, Nwoye. The narrator reveals Nyowe’s doubts following his realization that Ikemefuna—whom he thinks of as a brother— has died according to the traditions of the clan. Nwoye feels something snap within him and doubts the justice of this action. This revelation, then, marks the first example of a clansman questioning the long-held traditions of Umuofia.
Another example of questioning occurs after Okonkwo accidentally shoots a member of the clan and thus must leave the clan and go into exile for seven years; according to custom, after he leaves, other clansmen must destroy his homes, land, and animals. In this moment, Okonkwo follows dutifully without questioning the clan’s ways. However, Obierika, Okonkwo’s closest friend and a respected member of the clan, has a head full of questions as he completes these traditional duties. Obierika’s questions probe the logic and justice of the clan’s traditions; more important, his questions end the first section of Achebe’s novel. These are the final thoughts before the white man and Christianity enter both the novel and Umuofia’s culture. As stories of violence become more prominent in the region, and as Okonkwo’s own son, Nwoye, chooses to follow the Christian missionaries, tensions mount irrevocably between the ever-growing Christian population and the traditional clans. Nevertheless, though the Christians represent change to the clansmen, Achebe also illustrates their own devotion to tradition through the figure of Reverend Smith, the missionaries’ second leader. The narrator describes Smith as a man who only sees the world in black and white, and his actions reflect his unwavering belief in the ways of his own culture and religion. Mr. Smith, much like Okonkwo, refuses to see value in other cultures, other traditions. Both Okonkwo and Mr. Smith starkly contrast the actions of Mr. Brown, the missionaries’ first leader, and Akunna, a great man in one of Umuofia’s neighboring villages. Mr. Brown and Akunna spend hours respectfully discussing their respective religions, and though neither of them convert to a new religion, both men begin to develop a sense of understanding for the other’s beliefs. Okonkwo and Mr. Smith, however, never develop a sense of understanding, and neither man allows his traditional belief system to change. Moreover, both Mr. Smith and then Okonkwo react to the potential of change with violence. Okonkwo’s ultimate demise occurs when he is so overwrought with aggression and violence that he slays a court messenger in order to protect Umuofia’s sanctity. When he realizes that his clansmen will not follow in violence, Okonkwo decides to take his own life
130â•…â•… Adams, Henry rather than face the changes his clan will inevitably undergo. Therefore, his obstinate devotion to tradition leads to his shameful death. Perhaps, then, the best solution Achebe includes in the novel comes through the quiet discussions between Mr. Brown and Akunna—two men who do not act in violence or hatred in order to guard their respective traditions, but instead strive to understand. Lindsay Cobb
ADAMS, HENRYâ•… The Education of Henry Adamsâ•… (1907)
The Education of Henry Adams, first published privately in 1907, remains Henry Adams’s best-known work and one of the greatest autobiographies ever written. In it, Adams (1838–1918) tells of his own life in the third person, covering the period of his early childhood to his later life. The Education, richly filled with symbolism, contains his systematic view of history as a force of progress. The main character of the Education is Adams, narrated in the third person by the author, born into the great Adams family (the same family that produced the U.S. presidents John Adams and John Quincy Adams) in the early 19th century. As a young boy, Adams grows up in luxury, and he encounters a number of famous Americans, beginning with those in his family, to whom he gives heroic status. He later attends Harvard and embarks upon a career. During this time, as he moves out of the comfort of New England, young Adams finds a number of new heroes, especially the English. Throughout his “education,” the young Adams explores such themes as education, science and technology, and innocence and experience. The Education tells the story of one man’s engagement with his culture and society. Henry’s experiences allow the author Adams to step back and evaluate his life in relation to the larger movement of history and the growth of America toward the turn of the century. Michael Modarelli
Education in The Education of Henry Adams
Education in Henry Adams’s autobiography is a quest for a specific doctrine—perhaps a specific
plan of action or worldview—by which he can live his life. In contrast to other famous autobiographies, such as the Confessions of Jean-Jacques Rousseau or The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, Adams’s work does not end as a success story. In fact, the quest for education carries Adams through to the final chapters. Never culminating in a heroic apex, the work describes the protagonist’s attempt to reconcile ideas of past learning with the new technological and industrial world. Indeed, education serves to bring the author to the unfolding nature of learning and knowledge as it plays out in progressive civilizations. The Education of Henry Adams begins as Adams is born in Boston, Massachusetts, in privileged circumstances as a member of the illustrious Adams family; his father was the diplomat Charles Francis Adams I, and his grandfather was the former U.S. president John Quincy Adams. To distance himself from the narrative, however, he writes the story in the third person, calling himself Henry. From the outset, Adams notes that the “problem” of education began at a very early age. He traces his first rudimentary forays into education from the beginning when, as a child living in Quincy, just south of Boston, he learned color and taste. From here, he begins to notice divisions—marked separations in the world, starting with summer and winter—and these notions would permeate his more formal education. Isolated in his Quincy home, young Henry knew little of the exterior problems of the world. When his grandfather puts on his hat and walks young Henry to school, this marks the boy’s entry into formal education. Of his formal education he says little—he disliked the formalities of education and rote memorization. Of entering a symbolically American institution, Harvard, he notes only that his four years there left him with an autobiographical “blank.” Adams continues to remind the reader, however, that his narrative is a story of education. The places and people who figure in the narrative only have value insofar as they pertain to Henry’s education. His early heroes were John Quincy Adams and George Washington, as well as 18th-century historians. Soon he widens his horizons, geographically speaking, by moving out of Massachusetts, and he
The Education of Henry Adamsâ•…â•… 131 seeks out new heroes from whom he can learn. As secretary to his father, ambassador to Great Britain (1861–68), Adams finds little redeeming in Englishmen and British politicians. In England, he learns the Englishmen show more compassion for the American confederacy than he initially thought. And, upon returning to the United States, he finds little in the people that he can salvage for his education. Henry votes for Ulysses S. Grant after the war because he thinks a decorated military hero will lead well, but, in an entire chapter devoted to Grant, he ends up finding the president distasteful. All in all, Adams sees a decline in the United States from Washington to Grant. Once again, he returns to Harvard, this time to teach medieval history, but his educational idealism finds university life mediocre at best, and he considers this more education lost. The book jumps forward at this point 20 years because, as Adams reminds the reader, his is a story of education, and only matters pertinent to education are noted. This is a new educational starting point for Adams, he writes. At this time in his education, he wishes to drop studying what the world does not care for anymore and concentrate his education on what interests people. At the Chicago Exposition of 1893, he notices the dominance of wealth and science. Clearly, it seems to Adams, the country is moving in a path that favors capitalism and technological power. These are contrasts to what Adams calls his 18th-century education, and as symbols of power and wealth, they contradict his ideas of medieval art. At the Paris Exposition seven years later, Adams once again comments on the importance of these symbols, specifically in the demonstration of the dynamo, an electrical generator invented for producing power. In the famous chapter entitled “The Virgin and the Dynamo,” Adams compares the Virgin Mary’s power for stimulating human energies with the dynamo’s power. Believing the dynamo might somehow provide a specific world plan for him, much as writing about the Romans had stimulated the 18th-century historian Edward Gibbon, Adams believes he has finally found a satisfactory way of looking at history. By placing the medieval expression of art into a system of history, he finds a way that he, and he hopes other people, might better cope with historical pattern and change.
Although much of the Education bases itself on Adams’s personal learning, the book is an attempt to come to grips with the larger ethos of education. What Adams sees in the Virgin, for example, is a symbol of force; in the dynamo, he envisions the same notion of force, as comprehended by modern man. The medieval mind symbolized its power of force in the Virgin, so this forms the connection to Adams’s idea of the dynamo—a symbol of the technology of the oncoming 20th century—and its effects on his life, which began in Quincy and Boston, symbols of the young America. Michael Modarelli
Innocence and Experience in The Education of Henry Adams
The symbolism in Henry Adams’s autobiography clearly marks his progression from innocence to experience. As Adams traces the paths of symbols from his childhood home in Boston, he essentially delineates his route from innocence to experience. Born in an upper-class home in Boston and raised in Quincy, where his grandfather, John Quincy Adams, walked him to school, young Henry becomes immediately influenced by his illustrious relative. For Henry, his grandfather represents the shaping of America, the glorious common sense of the 18th century, and he often thinks of John Quincy’s role in the formation of the country as well as his journeys to foreign lands as a diplomat. John Quincy Adams was not Henry’s only hero—in his youth he idolized George Washington, Edward Gibbon, his great-grandfather John Adams, and others. In these heroes Henry found men whose interests lay in wide realms; these were men of action and, most specifically, men whose values reflected conventional New England attitudes of self-discipline, character, and accomplishment. But Henry’s life, which means his education, forms the kernel of the Education, and it is John Quincy Adams who precipitates this journey, taking young Henry by the hand and walking him in silence to the school on a hot morning. Symbolically, then, his grandfather ushers Henry into the Adams fold and into education at a very young age, marking the gradual transition from innocence to experience.
132â•…â•… Adams, Henry In his youth, however, Adams hates the rote memorization and formalities of school. He would rather go to see Washington than read about it, which he does at age 12, and he seems to think application lies in actual experience and not formal schooling (although he does have a predilection for languages and mathematics). Eventually, like all upper-class New England boys, Adams enters Harvard, where he later concludes that he learned nothing, or all that he learned could have been done in four months’ time. Harvard, then, does nothing to improve Adams’s transition to experience—it seems it was still the beginning point. And teaching provides him with no relief. As a professor of medieval history at Harvard, he is successful, producing many respectable students; however, his upbringing in the Adams fold has taught him never to be satisfied with mediocrity, which he finds in his education. And although he has the experience of education behind him, Adams feels his journey is not done. In fact, all of Adams’s life as documented in the Autobiography is a progression from innocence to experience. Adams often reflects on his early heroes, not necessarily acquiring new ones but comparing the old ones to the heroic figures of his day. He compares Ulysses S. Grant to Washington, claiming a sad degeneration of mankind in the former from the latter. And although his life progresses throughout his education and he moves through a succession of careers with success, he constantly notes that his education has come, sadly, to some kind of end. Still, by the Chicago Exposition of 1893, Adams admits he is still innocent in a certain way. He knows how to look at art, he knows how to study history, and he has a storehouse of information and a wealth of 18th-century values. However, he has no way to assimilate the new technology at the exposition—he cannot reconcile these exhibits with any experience he has had. Adams is completely innocent in the ways of the changing world. This is especially evident when he encounters the dynamo, the newest power generator. What Adams finds he has to do is to somehow find a link from the past to the present—to, in this case, the powerful and awesome dynamo—so that he can understand the shift the world is making.
The narrative in the Autobiography leads up to this culminating point, where Adams must move from innocence to experience by coming to a historical understanding of mankind. From this understanding, he can then find the natural shifts in his own life, prompting him to write the Education. And he finds the answer in his use of symbols, which have played such an important part of his life. What Adams discovers is that although the dynamo is a relatively new force, forces have been around since the beginning of time. The dynamo is, in effect, the symbol for a new era. Past eras such as the Middle Ages, Adams concludes, found their symbols in religion, especially the Virgin Mary. In order to come to an awareness of some kind of force, he contends, man symbolized it, much like Adams had done in his youth with the forces around him. The concept of force, then, plays a fundamental role in his view of history and life—force becomes symbolized to represent its power on and within the lives of people. In a sense, Adams’s Education comes to represent the forces exterior to his own life, and the book becomes a symbol for his progression from innocence to experience. Michael Modarelli
Science and Technology in The Education of Henry Adams
As a child, young Henry grows up with what he describes as an 18th-century mind-set, but his view must soon change to accompany the introduction of new science and technology in the 19th century. The Adamses, a lineage tracing back to the United States’s foundation as a nation, were symbolic of America, and young Henry sees the connections between his family and American nationhood. The Massachusetts State House, New England, his grandfather John Quincy Adams, and the entire Adams family symbolize the educated mind and its entry into a new world. Adams reflects on this especially as his grandfather walks him to school, a symbolic entry into education. Adams links the mind and its application to changing epochs in symbols. As a historian, Adams has studied the Middle Ages, and he notices the power of the symbol in the Virgin Mary. Later, at the Chicago Exposition of 1893, he notes the grow-
Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?â•…â•… 133 ing symbolism of money inherent in capitalism. However, the symbolism of science and technology remains the greatest influence for his theory of history. While at the Paris Exposition of 1900, Adams connects this power of symbolism to the science and technology of his day. He sees the power of the dynamo much as he suggests people of the Middle Ages saw the cross or the Virgin Mary: The power of both represent a symbol of infinity, or a great moral force. Adams sees the Virgin as her time’s dynamo; she was a power of force, a mysterious bundle of energy. Similarly, the burgeoning inventions in science and technology of the 20th century represent a phenomenon of new force, which the individual must learn to grasp. Since science and technology represent, for Adams, a large shift from his 18th-century upbringing, he feels he must understand the movement of history. His ideas of history are found in two chapters in which Adams becomes enamored with the complexity of the 20th century. The two chapters in the Education, “A Dynamic Theory of History” and “A Law of Acceleration,” are his solution to this complexity. Here, he argues that the solution is the mind. According to Adams, man has always conceptualized force into symbols. Since man can conceptualize force, he can control it. Adams sees the progress of great ancient civilizations, such as Rome, as a result of this conceptualization of force. However, the breakdown of cultures occurs when man can no longer symbolize force. The Roman Empire broke down because the symbols did not keep up with the technological progress. Similarly, the Middle Ages’ identification with the cross led to a breakdown, as man no longer conceptualized the force in the cross. So, Adams contends, the burst of scientific thinking that led to the Paris Exposition of 1900 was a direct result of man’s free thought away from any conceptualization of force. The age’s scientific and technological advances frighten Adams. He sees the scientific achievements and technological prowess of his day at Paris, and he envisions a chaotic future. What members of the 20th century must do, he thinks, is achieve some kind of symbolization which individuals might apply to the present. Adams’s search for symbols leads him from antiquity to his present day. All of
the progresses of civilization that culminated in the scientific and technological advancements of the 20th century require a symbol, because symbols are man’s way of apprehending the idea of these forces. Ultimately, Adams’s theory of history rests on the power of the mind to apprehend these symbols. Again and again, he acknowledges this fact throughout the Education. His symbolic entrance into education provided the point of entry for Adams. As Adams the boy recognized the force of his educational life in symbols, so must mankind harness the force of science and technology in some kind of symbol. At the end, Adams suggests the comet, a force that heads to the sun, accelerating its motion toward a new equilibrium. Like science and technology, the comet represents a force that has the power for its own destruction, yet it reverses itself and embarks on a new course before it collides with the sun. The journey of the Education is a journey to understand the power of change. Adams believed the power of change in civilization necessitated a balance between the individual and the innovations of the day. He thought science and technology needed a symbol to which man could ascribe this force of progress, and he thought this was the only possible route to harness this power. Michael Modarelli
ALBEE, EDWARDâ•… Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?â•… (1963)
Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ? is Edward Albee’s most successful play, one which has enjoyed a healthy production history. The original 1963 Broadway production won the Tony Award and New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award for best new play, a 1966 film starred the acting legends Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor, and a recent production (2004–07) played successfully on Broadway and in London’s West End. While being a box office success (the original production ran 644 performances) and a popular vehicle for major performers, in the 1960s it was one of the most controversial of Albee’s plays. The nominating jury selected the play for the 1963 Pulitzer Prize for Drama, but the Pulitzer Prize Board refused to give its approval, citing
134â•…â•… Albee, Edward Albee’s “filthy” use of sexual themes and profanity. Two of the jury’s members resigned in protest. In the 21st century, the play’s content no longer shocks, leading Albee (b. 1928) to create a 2002 update, which includes even more intense language. Language and sex and sexuality may have been the most unsettling qualities of the play in the 1960s, but it is the play’s unrelenting exposure of violence at the heart of marriage that continues to challenge its audiences. Family, specifically marriage, is treated as a destructive institution, built on lies. Violence is a constant of the relationships in the play. Indeed, the play is an act of violence: It is a “murder” of George and Martha’s imaginary son. George has told Martha that if she ever speaks of their “son” to others, he will “kill” him. In the midst of these brutal relationships, Albee employs alienation as a symptom of the violence at the heart of institutions, in this case marriages. Thus, he does what he has regularly claimed is the act of a good writer: understands the hopelessness of existence and yet struggles for a hopeful angle on it. In Woolf, the hopelessness centers on the brutal communications and manipulations at the heart of marriage. Ben Fisler
Alienation in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?
Were it not for the sacrificial psychic murder of the fictional child, Edward Albee’s play might read as true theater of the absurd, a style of theater popular in the mid-20th century that grew from the concept that life has no meaning. The play encapsulates the communication breakdowns, disconnected conversations, and identity confusions of the absurdists Eugene Ionesco, Jean Genet, or Samuel Beckett. The death of the boy, however, disrupts the existential despair as clearly as it disrupts the violence inherent in George and Martha’s verbal exchanges. By killing the boy, George destroys the most dominant lie at the core of their failed marriage. The ritual sacrifice of the child allows the dawn to rise on a new world. However, that new world is not necessarily one of simple hope. Martha is terrified to look on the new day, prophetically answering the question of the play, “who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf,” with her paralytic, fearful “I .╯.╯. am .╯.╯. George .╯.╯. I .╯.╯. am .╯.╯.” (Act 3). If Albee’s indictment were
merely against a dysfunctional marriage, or some dysfunctional marriages, the new world might come into clearer focus. But, as it is Albee’s view that the fundamental destructiveness of family discourse is itself the problem, he is no more certain than his characters what the new world will look like. He is sure that the destructive institutions need to be demolished if anything better is to be uncovered, but he cannot tell us what the alternative will look like, if indeed an alternative exists. Clearly, however, institutions are themselves the problem. As Albee focuses his sardonic wit on marriage, he incorporates attacks on the educational system, career, and fatherhood. Martha thinks Nick is a math professor, even arguing about it with Honey. George likewise questions Nick’s certainty about his profession, admonishing him; “Martha is seldom mistaken .╯.╯. maybe you should be in the math department, or something” (Act 1). George refers to his degrees, combining A.B., M.A., and Ph.D. to make the distorted acronym ABMAPHID, which he then reflects “has been variously described as a wasting disease of the frontal lobes and as a wonder drug. It is actually both” (Act 1). He then suggests that Nick might run the history department when he is 40 and looks 55, prompting Nick to remind George once more that Nick is a biologist. George tells of the time he briefly ran the history department while the other faculty fought in World War II. He is bitter that they returned: “Not one sonof-a-bitch got killed” (Act 1). He also states that a faculty member who died in the cafeteria line was buried in the bushes around the chapel, commenting that faculty members “make excellent fertilizer” (Act 1). It is only one of many lashes at Martha’s father, whom he variously calls a “god” and someone who “expects his .╯.╯. staff .╯.╯. to cling to the walls, of [the university] like ivy” (Act 1). Martha’s father, of course, appears to have always been cruel to George, mocking his novel about his own horrific childhood experience and threatening to fire him if he publishes it. Yet he has also exerted tyrannical control over Martha, forcing her to annul her marriage to the gardener who was her first real love. The combination of these secondary stories of abuse and humiliation, from George’s contempt for his own education to Martha’s overbearing father meddling
Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?â•…â•… 135 in both their lives, suggests that all family, career, and social institutions are fundamentally destructive to the human beings engaged in them. The result of the many acts of violence is a painfully introspective, existentially detached series of dialogues that mix into the more brutal, direct exchanges. The specter of alienation first appears subtly when George asks Nick if he “like[s] it here,” meaning the university, and Nick replies that “it’s fine” in reference to the room. The men also repeatedly confuse each others’ wives in conversation. Nick: [S]he .╯.╯. gets sick quite easily George: .╯.╯. Martha hasn’t been sick a day in her life Nick: No, no; my wife .╯.╯. my wife gets sick quite easily. Your wife is Martha. George: Oh, yes .╯.╯. I know. (Act 2) At the top of act 2, the repeat of this miscommunication becomes a preamble for a lengthy discussion of each other’s personal pains in relation to their wives, in which neither really listens to the other, except to cause small hurts. Later, the alienation factor increases. At the end of act 2, Honey describes a fantasy about children and feeling exposed while George unsuccessfully tries to make her aware of her husband’s liaison with his wife. At the top of act 3, Martha has an entirely rhetorical conversation about her feeling abandoned and constantly crying, while violently searching for “the bastards” who are hiding from her, which eventually degrades into her mimicking the sound of the ice in her glass, with “clink.” The most terrifying of these moments occurs immediately before the boy’s death is made official. Martha rants about her attempts to protect the child from every “failure”; George counters by reciting the Libera Me, a responsory portion of the Roman Catholic funeral mass. Increasingly, Albee’s characters illustrate the alienation imposed upon human beings by the destructive institutions of their worlds, preparing the audience for the needed “exorcism” of the fictional child. George prepares to destroy the child by returning to his use of the Latin mass. When he tells Martha that Crazy Billy delivered a telegram that
their boy has been killed in a car crash, she screams, “YOU .╯.╯. CAN’T .╯.╯. DO .╯.╯. THAT.” He engages the others in the exorcism, first by fooling Nick into reinforcing the idea that the boy’s death is not within George’s “power,” then by looking to Honey to verify that he did indeed consume the telegram (the only evidence) before her eyes. Martha continues to explore the stages of grief—first denial, then anger, then bargaining (“you didn’t have to push it over the EDGE,” then depression as she sinks into a sudden awareness of her fatigue and lack of interest in drinking, and finally reaches acceptance (“You had to?” and “Just .╯.╯. us?”). The sacrifice and the aftermath are complete as George and Martha face the dawn of a new day alone. Albee’s delicately constructed murder, revelation, and mourning clearly attest to what the author sees as the need for destructive human institutions to be destroyed. But killing the lie on which George and Martha’s marriage has been built does not leave behind a nurturing marriage. Rather, it leaves behind a world of uncertainty and terror. Within that terror, however, is the hope for a better existence, one that leaves behind destructive institutions like marriage, with their violent, manipulative, and treasonous acts of communication and interaction and the deep psychic alienations experienced by their participants. In the dawn at the end of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ? is the possibility, despite Albee’s inherently cynical and sardonic view of the world, that human beings may indeed be able to care for one another. But only by obliterating the institutions that compel them to control, alienate, and abuse each other will that possibility ever be realized. That is a Virginia Woolf of which to be afraid. Ben Fisler
Family in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?
Lies, misunderstandings, and betrayals are the backbone of relationships in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?. So unrelenting and broad are the assaults that neither Martha or George can be named the aggressor in their cruel games. Simultaneously, Nick and Honey reveal that while some couples might not attack each other publicly, they are still victimized by the fundamental destructiveness of relationships. All couples are destroying each other with lies, manipu-
136â•…â•… Albee, Edward lations, and betrayals. Those most visibly showcased in Woolf are referred to fancifully in the text as “the bit about the kid,” “the mouse [that] got all puffed up,” and “hump the hostess.” It is unclear whether Martha and George were unable or unwilling to conceive a child, but ultimately this is an irrelevant question. The creation of the fictional son is not a delusion meant to fill some maternal/paternal gap in their lives, as there is no evidence that either partner believes the child to be real. Rather, the son is a lie that they created to be the ultimate game. A son allows for limitless possibilities in their ongoing assaults on each other. Being a completely fictional human being, he can be anything they want him to be that is convenient to the current abuse. He can be disappointed in his father; be an estranged but successful student; be ashamed of his mother; or, as George finally, coldly, determines, he can be dead. Throughout the play, the couple manipulate the gamut of the boy’s potential. In the first act, subtitled “Fun and Games,” Martha decides their son’s birthday is coming soon and reveals this to Honey privately. Then the question of when the boy is coming home is raised, and Martha tries to change the subject. Suddenly, she turns the discussion to the problems that George has. He expresses confusion over who has the problems, himself or the child. Then Martha suggests that “the little bugger” might not be George’s before quickly putting that suspicion to bed: “I wouldn’t conceive with anyone but you.” Near the end of the second act, subtitled “Walpurgisnacht” (a reference to the pagan/Roman Catholic festival that has variously been a time of games and tricks, a time when demonic forces walk the earth, or the celebration of Walpurg is, one of the saints who brought salvation to Germany), George invents the telegram of their son’s death. In the third act, “The Exorcism,” they battle over the boy’s entire life story, from his birth to his adulthood. Each fiction about the boy is directed as an attack on the other’s spouse. George states that Martha had a difficult labor, questioning her health and suitability for motherhood. Martha claims that when the boy broke his arm, George cried and was of no help, while she fashioned a sling and carried him to safety. They argue whether the child was
ashamed of his father or his mother, trading blows over Martha’s drinking and George’s career failings. Even mentioning the child to a stranger is an act of violence, a breach of protocol, which George decries in his outburst “You goddamn destructive.” Albee uses these verbal acts of violence to reveal how individuals in marriages pit their careers, their communications, and even their children against one another. The choice to make Martha and George’s child fictional underlines the symbolic meaning of their marriage, already suggested in their names (an allusion to George and Martha Washington). Such is the cruelty at the heart of this marriage that the couple has invented a child simply to abuse each other. Albee is determined not to allow the play to describe only one disturbed couple. When George learns of the lies at the source of Nick and Honey’s marriage (the hysterical pregnancy and the wealthy missionary), he waits a mere 30 minutes of stage time (approximately) to play “Get the Guests.” Cruelly twisting Nick and Honey’s personal pains, he transforms their story into a tale of a “scientist and his mouse.” He turns the story into an exposure of those lies, calling her “money baggage amongst other things” and then revealing the lie that built their marriage initially: “The Mouse got all puffed up one day .╯.╯. and she said .╯.╯. look at me .╯.╯. and so they were married .╯.╯. and then the puff went away .╯.╯. like magic .╯.╯. poof.” While it is George who exposes the lies at the heart of their marriage, it is the institution of marriage that created them. The unsuccessful infidelity referred to by George as a game of “hump the hostess” begins as an expansion of Albee’s efforts to expose the betrayals in Nick and Honey’s marriage and then expands to indict all marriages at the university. After Nick fails to “perform,” Martha begins a long speech complaining about: Boozed-up .╯.╯. impotent lunk-heads .╯.╯. [who] roll their beautiful, beautiful eyes .╯.╯. and .╯.╯. bounce .╯.╯. over to old Martha .╯.╯. [and then] back to the soda fountain again where they fuel up some more, while Marthapoo sits there with her dress up over her head .╯.╯. suffocating .╯.╯. waiting for the lunk-heads;
Little Womenâ•…â•… 137 so, finally, they get their courage up .╯.╯. but that’s all baby. (Act 3) Nick is not an unfaithful husband who attempts, albeit without consummation, to cheat on his young wife. Rather, he is a reminder that there are not better husbands than George or better marriages than George and Martha’s. All husbands described in the play are unfaithful; the implication is that all marriages are built on infidelity, lies, and betrayal. For Albee, family, specifically marriage, is a destructive institution with violence at its core. Ben Fisler
V iolence in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?
In Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?, violence is a constant, culminating in the murder of the fictional child. George’s murder of the child is an act of the most deadly violence, but contradictorily it becomes a kind of ritual sacrifice. Faced with the constant barrage of insults, humiliations, and occasional physical attacks, killing the imaginary child seems the only way to save George and Martha from the never-ending cruelties of marriage. As the sun rises, his death is left behind in the night, and the couple look to the obvious symbol of a new world about to dawn. From the moment they arrive home, Martha is calling George a cluck and their home a dump, while George is correcting her grammar as part of his own passive/aggressive strategy. Martha accuses George of never getting involved in the parties, while George mocks her behavior at the party as “braying.” They continue in the presence of Nick and Honey. George refers to an abstract painting as “a pictorial representation of the order of Martha’s mind”; Martha mocks him with the story of her besting him in a “boxing match.” Both spouses drag the guests into their abuses. Martha becomes increasingly aggressive in her flirtations with Nick to threaten George, while George attacks Nick’s profession on the basis of obscure fantasies of eugenics. When Martha and Nick’s liaison is imminent, George chooses to ignore her, claiming that it is four o’clock and time for him to read. This makes Martha even more furious. As she prepares to join Nick, she threatens to make George “sorry that
[he] made [her] want to marry [him]” and “sorry that [he] ever let [himself ] down” (Act 2). To ensure that the viewers do not think that violence is unique to George and Martha’s relationship, Albee gives Nick and Honey their moments of abuse as well. Nick claims to be ignorant of how his words could be hurtful, but he is unrelenting in calling George “sir” (which George takes as a comment on his age) and tells him he does not know much about science. Nick seems aware from the beginning that he is being pulled into their games: “Do you want me to say it’s funny, so you can contradict me and say it’s sad .╯.╯. [Y]ou can play that damn little game any way you want to, you know[?]” (Act 2). However, he continues to play the games even as he repudiates them. Honey is as close to being the victim in this tragedy as any of the four characters, being collateral damage at the end of the first two acts (she vomits and collapses in the bathroom). Yet even she has her cruel streaks. She explodes with delight during the acts of violence at the end of the second act, even though they include George’s attempted strangulation of Martha. Perhaps her worst moment in the play occurs when she decides to verify George’s murder of the imaginary son, attesting to the arrival of the telegram and even to George’s ludicrous claim that he ate the message. Violence is a constant in the play, but it is not the sickening behavior of an emotionally unstable, alcoholic wife or a passive/aggressive, crypto-misogynist husband. Albee does not allow the attentive viewer to merely dismiss George and Martha as a dysfunctional couple. In Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf ?, all couples are victims and purveyors of the violence at the heart of marriage. This violence makes meaningful connections or a nurturing family unit impossible. The violence produces the alienation that we see revealed throughout the play. Ben Fisler
ALCOTT, LOUISA MAYâ•… Little Womenâ•… (1868–1869)
Louisa May Alcott, the author of Little Women, was born in Germantown, Pennsylvania, in 1832 and died in Boston, Massachusetts, in 1888. Little Women is semiautobiographical in nature, based
138â•…â•… Alcott, Louisa May primarily on Alcott’s happy childhood in a large, formerly upper-class family who have fallen on hard times. Alcott’s novel follows the sisters of the March family in their transition from adolescence to adulthood. She models Meg, Beth, and Amy on her sisters and endows the character of Jo with much of her own independent spirit, personal struggles, and love of writing. The novel is a window into Victorian life, especially in respect to the lives of women. The March sisters must learn to accept the expected, but often restrained, role for women as mothers and wives. Jo especially has to struggle with her desire for an independent life as a writer and the accepted role of women during her time. Yet even Jo finds comfort in the closeness and security family life creates for the March girls. The sickness and eventual death of beloved Beth, the European travels of Amy, and the marriage of Meg test, but cannot break, these close family bonds. Despite the tragic elements present in Little Women, the book remains an uplifting moral work, designed to both entertain and impart moral lessons to the reader. At the end of the novel, the characters are left leading fulfilled, upright lives as mothers in their own families. The domestic sphere that is romanticized in the Victorian period is also idealized in the novel, and Little Women is at its heart a celebration of family. Cheryl Blake Price
The American Dream in Little Women
The American dream has long symbolized a change of fortune and the hope that through hard work or luck, even the poorest person can prosper. Immigrants flooding into America in the 19th century came looking for new opportunities that would lift them out of the poverty they had experienced in their home countries; for them, the American dream was inseparably linked with material wealth. In Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women, the March family offers a different view of the American dream—a vision of prosperity based not on material gain but on moral and spiritual wealth. At first, the American dream seems to have failed for the March family. Mr. March has lost the family fortune in some unfortunate business invest-
ments. The four March sisters—Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy—are caught between worlds; by birth, they are expected to associate with their wealthy neighbors. However, their poverty creates a distinct difference between them and their friends. Much of Little Women deals with the temptations and frustrations the March sisters feel as a result of their altered situation, and from their trials the sisters learn that “love, protection, peace, and health, the real blessings of life” are “things more precious than any luxuries money could buy.” While each of the family members strives to become a better person and overcome individual faults, their piety and charity does not protect the family from tragedy. Yet a silver lining exists behind every difficulty because bad experiences usually help teach the girls about the important things in life. In order to strengthen her moral argument, Alcott provides some foils to the March family in the form of the Gardiner and Moffat families. Both of these families represent the traditional American dream of social mobility gained through material wealth; however, when compared to the Marches, they are portrayed as lacking the happiness and blessings of the March family. The wealthy Moffats are described as “not particularly cultivated or intelligent people, and that all their gilding could not quite conceal the ordinary material of which they were made.” During a short visit to the Moffat home, Meg overhears some hurtful gossip about her family and gladly leaves the Moffats to return to the quiet sanctuary of her home. While this episode does not completely cure Meg of coveting items such as Sallie Gardiner’s fancy clothing and trinkets, by the end of the novel she realizes that her life with John in the “Dovecote” is far happier than the rich life Sallie and Ned Moffat lead in their mansion. The Marches’ poverty is often presented as having advantages, and the relative independence the girls receive from their situation is one of these advantages. As the family fortune has been lost, Meg and Jo offer to work to help support the family. These two sisters obtain jobs outside of the family, but Jo’s writing soon becomes a welcome source of extra income and allows a few luxuries. Eventually, Jo’s successes inspire her to leave her family and move to New York to pursue literary prospects, an
Little Womenâ•…â•… 139 opportunity that would not have been available at home. As time passes, she heeds the advice of Mr. Bhaer and writes a successful novel based on her life experiences. The opportunity that America symbolizes for so many, as well as the idea that hard work pays off, is illustrated here. Instead of restoring wealth to the March family, Louis May Alcott’s girls learn that true wealth cannot be purchased, but other blessings enhance life. Especially when Beth succumbs to heart damage caused by scarlet fever, the family comes together in the realization that love and family are more important than material objects. By the end of the novel, the surviving March girls are all happily placed with caring husbands, and while Meg and Jo cannot be considered wealthy, they lead rich and fulfilling lives. Through their hard work and devotion to family, the girls do realize their own form of the American dream: a good husband, a close family, and a comfortable, if not extravagant, lifestyle. Cheryl Blake Price
Illness in Little Women
Before antibiotics and immunization, health and illness were daily concerns for many people. Little Women reflects the preoccupation with wellness that was present in the Victorian age and illuminates the ways in which illness was perceived during this time. The threat of disease hovers over the March family, and the tragic illness and subsequent death of beloved Beth serves many purposes in the novel. It mirrors Louisa May Alcott’s own experience with death, sheds light on Victorian beliefs about health, and imparts a moral lesson on the nature of sacrifice and the importance of Christian faith. Even though Beth’s death is heart-wrenching, Alcott instills the misfortune with hope, providing an optimistic vision of the strength of family bonds. In the Victorian period, death from infectious diseases and other illnesses that are easily treatable today were frequent. Little Women reflects Victorian beliefs about illness and shows how disease was viewed and treated in this time. These concerns were real for Alcott, who saw injury and disease daily as a Civil War nurse and experienced loss through the sickness and death of her sister Elizabeth. In America, ill health was especially prevalent for immi-
grants, who often lived in poor conditions and had inadequate nutrition. In the novel, the plight of the immigrant family is represented by the Hummels; it is through tending the sick Hummel children that Beth contracts scarlet fever. However, even prior to her illness, Beth is represented as having a weak constitution, something the Victorians believed made people more susceptible to disease. Beth’s illness is doubly troubling for the March family because Mr. March has also become unwell during his service for the Union Army. Mrs. March is away nursing her husband in Washington, D.C., when Beth gets sick, leaving her caretaking to Jo and the servant Hannah. While Mr. March goes on to recover fully, Beth’s constitution is further weakened by the scarlet fever and the development of rheumatic fever. Jo’s earnings from writing allow Beth and Mrs. March to travel to the seaside; the Victorians commonly believed that ocean air had curative powers. Despite these attempts, Beth never regains her health and comes to the realization that she will die. She retires to a sickroom, and, leaning upon her parents for support and guidance, Beth looks to her Christian faith to die at peace. Naturally, Beth’s death has a profound impact on the family, but in the sadness there comes an emphasis on the joys of life along with the misfortune. Jo, who has always struggled with her temper, finds that nursing Beth provides “lessons in patience [that] were so sweetly taught her that she could not fail to learn them.” Beth’s own struggles with her impending death also provide lessons in faith. At first overcome with sorrow, Beth becomes serene in her final illness, giving herself over to God. Beth’s illness highlights the important place Christianity holds in the text; much of Little Women is devoted to imparting Christian beliefs and improving moral character. Beth’s passing is hard for the family, but it teaches them life lessons and brings new appreciation for the blessings that they do have. Beth’s reliance on her faith is another important feature in the novel, as it allows her to die peacefully and promises a relief from her worldly suffering; it reaffirms the Christian ideology that is present throughout the text. Beth’s illness, modeled on Alcott’s own sister’s death, also highlights the fragility of life and gives
140â•…â•… Alcott, Louisa May the reader a glimpse of the real dangers illness presented in the Victorian period. The idea that Beth’s death highlights the blessings of life is further reinforced by the final chapter of Little Women. The chapter, entitled “Harvest Time,” signifies the bounty and good fortune of the harvest, but it also inspires images of transition and death. It is here that Alcott reveals that Laurie and Amy’s only daughter, also named Beth, is a frail, sickly child. The similarity in the name “Beth” is not a coincidence; like her aunt, it seems that little Beth’s constitution is under constant threat. However, fear of Beth’s fragility is bringing her parents closer and even causing improvements to their characters. Amy is “growing sweeter, deeper, and more tender,” and Laurie is “more serious, strong, and firm.” The lesson that both parents learn is that “beauty, youth, good fortune, even love itself, cannot keep care and pain, loss and sorrow, from the most blessed.” Cheryl Blake Price
Parenting in Little Women
Unsurprisingly, parenting plays a large role in Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women, a book that primarily chronicles the maturation of four sisters from young adolescence to adulthood. Just as Little Women can be seen as a guidebook for young adults (especially girls) on proper moral and social behavior, it can also serve as a primer for raising children. The parents of Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy have a very specific task: to mold their girls into industrious, helpful, and cheerful Christian women. Through personal example, daily lessons, and Christian teachings, Marmee and Father succeed in this goal, but not without some difficulties. Despite the hard work that parenting entails, it is presented as the epitome of a woman’s— and, to a large part, a man’s—life. The second part of the book continues to follow the lives of the girls once they marry and begin to have children of their own, which affords the novel another opportunity to model appropriate child-rearing practices and to present parenting as a joyful, necessary, and fulfilling experience. At the novel’s opening, the March family is, in effect, a one-parent household, as Mr. March is away from home fighting in the Civil War. With her eldest daughters growing rapidly, Marmee must
balance preparing her girls for adulthood with household duties, charitable work, and money matters. However, she does have some help from her two oldest daughters, Meg and Jo, who each “adopt” one of the younger siblings to watch over and care for. Although the novel certainly promotes the traditional nuclear family, it also shows that caring, successful families can come in other forms as well. Mr. March’s absence in the early part of the novel proves this, as does the example of the neighboring Lawrence family. The elderly Mr. Lawrence has lived through the loss of his wife, son, daughterin-law, and granddaughter, and he is left only with his grandson, Laurie. While the Lawrence household appears to be more disharmonious than the Marches’ at times, it shows that a nontraditional family can also flourish if proper parenting exists in the home. The biggest key to the Marches’ child-rearing success is that they parent through example and gentle guidance. Marmee’s management of Jo’s temper is a good example of this parenting style. Jo’s temper is infamous in the house, and she often has a hard time controlling it. When Jo’s anger leads Amy to have a life-threatening accident, Marmee steps in and confides to Jo that she has a similar anger problem. Showing Jo how she has overcome her temper, Mrs. March prompts Jo to conquer her own faults. Through parenting by example, little punishment is called for; remonstrance, if given, is usually a gentle shaming rather than harsh words or criticism. For the Marches, corporal punishment is out of the question. When Amy receives “several tingling blows” on her palm as punishment for breaking a school rule, Mrs. March states, “I don’t approve of corporal punishment, especially for girls.” The novel makes clear that children are to be raised with love and kindness, not harsh words or spankings. Rather than be sent back to a school that endorses corporal punishment, Amy is immediately withdrawn and is home-instructed by her mother and older sisters. Much of the girls’ education has been received at home, with Mr. March initially overseeing instruction and the girls carrying on their learning once he leaves to serve in the Union Army. Yet there is another sort of education that Mr. and Mrs. March are responsible for, and that
The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistf ight in Heavenâ•…â•… 141 is the religious education of their children. As the family patriarch and as a minister, Mr. March takes the condition of his daughters’ souls seriously and is primarily responsible for ensuring that his daughters become Christian women. This becomes most apparent during Beth’s last illness, in which her “Father and Mother guided her tenderly through the valley of shadow, and gave her up to God.” Faced with a family crisis, Mr. March looks to his faith to keep the family strong and together. Although Beth’s death casts a shadow over the family, the novel is firm in the idea that life goes on. The surviving girls go on to marry and have families of their own, and Meg, Jo, and Amy soon discover the challenges new parents face. Yet Marmee and Father remain important figures in their daughters’ lives, helping to shape the new mothers into successful parents. Particularly in the chapters dealing with Meg and the twins, the novel shows the girls adopting the techniques of their parents to become loving, responsible mothers. Family takes central importance in Little Women, and by detailing the parenting styles of Mr. and Mrs. March, the novel illustrates both the importance of parenting and how to parent well. Cheryl Blake Price
ALEXIE, SHERMANâ•… The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistf ight in Heavenâ•… (1993)
Sherman Alexie (b. 1966) describes The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven as “a thinly disguised memoir” in his introduction to the book’s 10th anniversary edition. It certainly is, though less selfconsciously so than more formal autobiographies. The book is a series of episodes: short, insightful explorations of contemporary Native American life. Set on a reservation in the Pacific Northwest, Lone Ranger and Tonto includes recurring characters such as Victor, the angry grown-up child of alcoholics whose life never seems to be on track; Thomas, a storyteller and outcast; and Junior, a kind, generous underachiever. These stories are never uplifting, though they are not without hope. They are never generous, though not without promise. They are never kind, though not without sympathy. Alexie’s tales are stories, in the best sense and in the classic
poetic tradition. They show us, always outsiders and after the fact, a world we cannot touch or even truly understand. And he speaks to us intentionally. He is a voice in our wilderness whose prophetic speech warns of our collective ignorance. We are introduced to his world through myths culled from life as he knows it: boys whose basketball days are over before they begin, men whose lives cannot reach beyond the boundaries imposed upon them, women who are alone even when they are with their companions. The stories comprise a totality, an impression of a life condemned and still struggling for a voice, one who can only find hope in the words that make it off the reservation. Aaron Drucker
Abandonment in The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistf ight in Heaven
The narrator calls the mother of his child a year or so after he left. Or maybe he does not. It depends on which version of the story you believe. There are several: some in passing, others consuming the narrative. All are true; none are true. It does not really matter whether he picked up the phone, the leaving is real just the same. “The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven” is a story about leaving. The titular story of Sherman Alexie’s collection, it tells the story of the end of the narrator’s relationship with the outside world, his coming home after the failures of college and relationships, and the finality of indecision. Abandonment is not, as some might think, an act of will, the assertion made by a final choice. Abandonment is the slow disintegration of the connections through too many inactions, too many failures to choose, of not deciding, of not doing. Abandonment is the natural consequence of ambivalence. The memory the narrator shares is sparked by a Creamsicle, given to him by a 7-11 night manager: “[T]hose little demonstrations of power tickled him. All seventy-five cents of it. I knew how much everything cost.” Everything has a price. The narrator is torn between his life in the city, the desire to assimilate and succeed, and his history—the Indian off the reservation, lost in the oppressive, commercial white world. The desire to succeed in the city is palpable; the drive toward gentrification is tangible.
142â•…â•… Alexie, Sherman He moves in with a white girl, gets a clerk job at a 7-11, and runs the graveyard shift. When he and his girlfriend fight, he drives away, learning the streets of Seattle in midnight tours of empty hills. He can never decide what he wants more: a life in the city, capitulating to the commercial and capitalist processes of a gentrified life, or a life back on the reservation, a hero in remission, the most successful failure of his generation. He turns first to drinking, the oblivion of the alcoholic haze that dulls the need for a decision, but his girlfriend will not let him find the answer at the bottom of a tall glass. “You’re just like your brother,” she yells. “Drunk all the time and stupid.” He knows exactly how much everything costs: “And she was a genius, too. She knew exactly what to say to cause me the most pain.” So, unable to face the choice, a sober life of capitalist striving or the sequestered oblivion of the reservation, he leaves. This choice is not a choice (she tells him not to return as he leaves), but he leaves the city, his only solution to his twin desires of being Indian and being accepted in the larger world, and abandons the life he began to build. He will never go back. In the book’s 10th anniversary edition, a story called “Junior Polatkin’s Wild West Show” was added by the author, who claims in his introduction that “it contains themes more adroitly covered in other stories.” Like the previous stories, “Junior Polatkin” also addresses a theme of being abandoned. However, instead of abandoning tradition or self, Junior acts in a more traditional mise-en-scène of abandonment. He moves off the reservation to go to college in Spokane, “the only Indian at Gonzaga, a small Jesuit school originally founded to educate the local tribes.” By Christmas break, he has fallen in love with Lynn, rebellious and outspoken, blonde and white. He overcomes his own difficulty and defensiveness, courts her, and has an affair with her. Sean Casey, “with dark skin and blue eyes, webbed toes” is born nine months later. But instead of the movie romance Junior imagines, Lynn is sequestered by her parents, and though he has “minimal visitation rights,” by the time Sean is three, Junior no longer has contact with him. He attempts to recover his ardor for education and his desire to become more than squandered potential, but even with some success, he finally leaves the city and returns to the
reservation, returning to the absent dreams and failed promises he had sought to overcome through college, career, and a life beyond being “just” Indian. For Alexie, abandonment is the underlying state—the affective cause for the fragmentation of the individual from community, tradition, and family. It is the continuous state of the Indian in a society that cannot integrate its past and its present, and as such it cannot conceive its future. When faced with the possibility of tomorrow, the only choice is retreat: to run away from the city, the world, and the senses, and to remember only how it all left you behind at the bottom of a bottle on the reservation. Aaron Drucker
Regret in The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistf ight in Heaven
Regret means that one wishes that something had not happened, that the result had been different. Regret expresses the desire that one’s action resulted in a different outcome. It is a deep longing for the alternative. For Sherman Alexie, regret is a poignant tool for reflection on the environment the contemporary reservation Indian inhabits. Junior, Alexie’s protagonist in “A Good Story,” writes stories about Indians. His mother reads his stories, but one day she asks, “Don’t you think your stories are too sad?” She makes a request: “You should write a story about something good, a real good story .╯.╯. Because people should know that good things always happen to Indians, too.” Junior obliges. The story is a simple one. Uncle Moses is a fixture of the reservation: old—very old—and like his ramshackle home, he seems to survive on determination and stubborn will. He is well known throughout the reservation, but few engage with him. Only Arnold, a chubby, pale boy, takes the time to really be with him. On this day, in this “good story,” Arnold skips a class field trip, instead meeting Uncle Moses for a sandwich and a story. Reflexively, Uncle Moses tells him the story of Arnold skipping a class field trip to share a sandwich and a story with Uncle Moses. Junior’s story is charming on its surface, but it is tinged with several layers of regret. First, and most apparently, is his mother’s initial request. While quilting, she ruminates on Junior’s stories of crying
The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistf ight in Heavenâ•…â•… 143 and (sadly) laughing Indians, and she wants to hear a different kind of story, without loss and without failure. She needs to hear that things can be okay, that things are not the way Junior depicts them. She feels that Indians are not always on a downward spiral, that good things happen all the time, and so Junior picks a good thing. The events of the story are small, intimate, personal—a moment of joy in a life literally collapsing. Uncle Moses’s house represents a central emblem of the story. Hand-built and structurally unsound, it is a monument to Uncle Moses’s achievement and his limitations. The house is not held together by sound engineering, and it will not outlast the life of the tribe like the pyramids of Egypt or the Pueblo rock dwellings, but it will hold together as long as willpower and memory can graft its oddly aligned walls together. Like the figure of Uncle Moses or the mother who requests Junior’s story, the house exists on tenuous strings of hope, struggling against the apparent failure of its faulty edifice in order to survive in its own right. It takes little to prop these figures up, but they are not strong in and of themselves, and they are aware of their frail state. This knowledge leads to a sense of what should have been, what could be, and ultimately a struggle against regret: holding one’s head high in the face of impending collapse. “A Good Story” binds Alexie’s collection together by signifying the instinctive tribal resistance to the almost overwhelming sensibility of regret throughout the rest of the novel’s episodes. Significantly, “A Good Story” is presented as a story within a story, framed by Junior’s mother’s request while she is quilting. Quilting is a curious activity. It is expressly concerned with bringing disparate, yet complementary, elements together to form a cohesive, comforting whole. Junior’s story— and the story he tells—serves much the same literary action. Lone Ranger and Tonto is a series of difficult episodes which the mother accurately describes as sad and, alternately, Junior adds, hysterical. They are often both funny and terrible simultaneously, and while Alexie’s work can be sympathetic and interesting, it also relates tales of loss, failure, death, or (worst of all) hopelessness. Each separate story adds its distinct element to the whole of the work; each tells its story of Indian experience. “A Good Story”
is much like the central patch of a quilt, the linchpin patch that is the key to the quilt’s narrative. That moment of hopeful camaraderie between the elder generation and the youngest, between mother and Junior and Uncle Moses and Arnold (significantly named, as well), highlights the possibilities for hope in the Indian reservation. These hopes are small, limited, personal, and temporary: a sandwich, a story, an afternoon of dawdling time. The loss of hope apparent in this limitation is staggering. There is nothing left for the tribe, for the reservation, or for the future to create tradition, history, or reverence. All that remains is the passing of time. In producing such a moment in “A Good Story” as the “good things” that happen to Indians, too, Alexie poignantly highlights this central regret of the overall narrative. Like the grandmother, Alexie seems to desire more than the grim truths of his sad stories, but he can only satisfy this need with the smallest of stories, without tradition, without history, and without mythology. Only in the stolen moments are there good stories in a world permeated with the regret of what was, what could have been, and what will never be. Aaron Drucker
Tradition in The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistf ight in Heaven
Tradition plays a central role in the stories of The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven. But tradition conceives a cultural identity that is both ever-present and perceptibly lost in Alexie’s vision of his people. While the iconic images of the Native American healer and dreamer appear, and images of the “fancydancer” and the storyteller are repeated throughout the novel, our conventional notion of tradition is usurped by the “new,” the present reality of the Indian nation. In the new tradition, a boy learns early that he has already failed, just by being born on the reservation. Like his ancestors, he will strive, he will dream, he will find his first drink, and he will settle into a life of restless failure. Tradition, often a source of a people’s pride, is instead called a “drug,” a placebo against the tide of injustice and despair inflicted upon (and buoyed by) Alexie’s picture of Native American life.
144â•…â•… Allende, Isabel Alexie deals with the misplaced assumptions of a positive tradition transparently in “A Drug Called Tradition.” His position is clearly stated: “Indians never need to wear a watch because your skeletons will always remind you about the time. See, it is always now.” There is no past, no future; there is only the present reality of circumstance. After a hallucinogenic round of storytelling (the “new drug” the protagonists take, while never named, may be the “traditional” Indian hallucinogen, peyote, but it could just as easily be mushrooms or LSD), Alexie’s narrator asserts that there is no real past for today’s Indians, nothing to reach back to but fictions created by deluded minds. The most potent stories come from a drug-induced haze, based on legends that are not theirs but have roots in Anglo mythology and iconography (as one boy says, “Van Gogh should’ve painted this one”), making ownership of an authentic past impossible. Without an authentic past, they cannot have real traditions, only fictions conglomerated from the pictures on television. They are reflected in Tonto, the loyal, semiliterate sidekick of the heroic Lone Ranger, spiritually bonding with the horses they steal; in Geronimo, sitting lonely in long-forgotten pictures; in the “young warrior,” an icon without name or resolution, archetypal but empty. But the story, as always, is more complex than the author’s apparent claim. While Alexie asserts that the conception of “Indian” has been usurped by the image of “the Indian,” the authentic replaced by the (Anglicized) image in the broader cultural identity, he identifies (purposefully) a more subtle, less idiographic but also more personal idea of the traditional at the very end of the story. Big Mom, the spiritual leader of the Spokane tribe, hands the narrator a small drum. “It looked like it was about a hundred years old, maybe older,” he writes. It is a small gift, a memento from the past that physically connects him to the spirit of his tribe. It is not an image, does not do great deeds of warriors, does not overthrow those who would oppress the tribe. The drum will not subvert the inexorable march of time and entropy, or so it seems. “I guess you could call it the only religion I have,” he says, “one drum that can fit in my hand, but I think if I played it a little, it might fill up the whole world.”
Tradition can be a drug, a destructive denial of reality. As Native Americans try to construct an identity culled from a tradition that is both theirs and not theirs, both Indian and media-imaged, “tradition” becomes meaningless. It is a present thing, a television presentation of an ancient myth that never was. Thus, the conventional role of tradition is fatally flawed for the Native American, as destructive as the hallucinogenic enterprise that initiates the story. But in the end, there remains a history that is real, and that is the narrator’s own. The old stories can no longer fulfill their function—they cannot inspire warriors to be great seekers of renown—but there remains a powerful history, a real past that can be held in the palm of the hand, from which the narrator derives the promise of a hopeful future where his stories, the drumming of his words, fill the world. In this sense, a personal tradition that rebuilds the stories one voice at a time resonates throughout Alexie’s book. His world of stories, the powerful rhythms of his narratives, reconstruct the potential of the promise the old traditions typified. Like the old stories, he weaves a world of possibility, illuminating the pitfalls of the present in the hopes of a future in which warriors can be proud to ride through the world outside the confining boundaries of the reservation. Aaron Drucker
ALLENDE, ISABELâ•… The House of the Spiritsâ•… (1982)
Isabel Allende’s The House of the Spirits, published in 1982, tells the history of several generations of the Trueba family against the backdrop of Chile’s socialist government and the 1973 military coup that gave rise to the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet. Clara, who regularly converses with the spirit world, marries Esteban Trueba, a wealthy landowner who regularly rapes peasant women working on his hacienda. Trueba becomes enraged when his daughter, Blanca, falls in love with one of the hacienda’s workers. Despite Trueba’s efforts, Blanca and her love are eventually united, but the circuitous path of their relationship is repeated in the lives and loves of other characters.
The House of the Spiritsâ•…â•… 145 Revenge parallels love. Trueba’s first illegitimate son, Esteban García, is directly responsible for the imprisonment, torture, and rape of Trueba’s granddaughter, Alba. At the end of the novel, Alba, uncertain as to whether the father of her unborn child is her true love, Miguel, or her archenemy, Esteban García, decides that she must break the violent cycle through forgiveness. Alba’s realization suggests that Latin America must break the trap of repetitive violence. Her name, which translates as “dawn,” implies that forgiveness is the necessary ingredient for a new era of Latin American history. Themes in the novel include love, oppression, heroism, death, violence, and hope. Alba’s forgiveness and implicit hope contrast sharply with the pessimism of other late 20th-century Latin American novels and place Allende’s work in a new literary movement known as the post boom. Anne Massey
Death in The House of the Spirits
Death in The House of the Spirits is a battle between despair and hope. It can be a fearful unknown at the end of mortal existence or an extension of life that parallels the mortal realm. It appears as fear and reassurance, associated both with the destruction of society by political and social ills and with the comfort of eternal connection to beloved friends and family. In the beginning, death equals suffering. At Easter Mass, the statues are deathly pale and covered with funeral shrouds. Rosa, whose green hair symbolizes life, dies early in the novel after drinking poisoned brandy. Trueba, Rosa’s beau, feels angry that death has stolen her away and begins to shrink as a physical representation of his disappointment and ire. Tres Marías smells like a tomb when Trueba first moves in. Trueba’s mother, Ester, is described as a living corpse, and in her last days, the odor of her decomposing flesh permeates the house. Later, secular and religious elements overlap. The plague and unemployment appear to be divine punishment for which pleas to God for mercy are to no avail. Severely ill peasants who die in the hospital are buried next to the church. Barrabás, Clara’s oversized stray dog that arrived on Holy Thursday, dies the night of her engagement party.
In contrast to the concept of death as brutal end is the perception that death is a welcome parallel to mortal existence. The Mora sisters have a photo proving that the souls of the deceased can take on a physical form. The appearance of Férula’s spirit, accepted matter-of-factly, forces Trueba and Clara to travel to her impoverished neighborhood in order to confirm her death. The Trueba family thinks nothing of eating at the table once used for wakes by Clara’s parents. After announcing her own death, Clara describes the process as similar to being born, feared only because people tend to be afraid of the unknown. Trueba sees Clara’s death as a natural transition and feels reconciled to her passing, realizing that she has completed her mission. He even makes plans to be with her in the hereafter, building a mausoleum to ensure this. Yet it is obvious that Clara, as her name meaning “clear” implies, was the window that allowed mortals a glimpse into the spirit world. After her death, the plants die and the cats run away. Only Clara’s room remains untouched by decay. And when Trueba opens Rosa’s casket as he transfers her to the mausoleum, her corpse, preserved in death as it had been in life, disintegrates into a fine powder. By contrast, life and death are viewed as parallel states but with a frightening, foreboding tone. As Pedro García lies dying, his grandson punches out the eyes of chickens and fantasizes about Trueba’s death. He would have punched out Pedro García’s eyes had Blanca not prevented it. Later, Blanca is disturbed by the artifacts her husband collects— mummies with necklaces of teeth. Blanca also worries that her daughter, Alba, does not play with dolls, but Alba sees the toys as miniature corpses. Nicolás tries to teach Alba not to fear death, having her imagine her mother lying in a coffin. His efforts fail; tortured by the military, Alba cannot quell her fears using her uncle’s methods. During the coup, Blanca and Alba rescue Pedro Tercero García, concealing him in a car resembling a hearse. Luisa Mora predicts that this moment in history will be marked by pain and innumerable dead. From the great beyond, Clara tries to protect Alba, but she, like all spirits, is useless in the face of cataclysmic events. The last chapter of the novel describes the destruction and death wrought by the
146â•…â•… Allende, Isabel military, a reality symbolized by the passing of the Poet, whose death represents the fall of freedom. In the end, however, Trueba’s death offers renewed hope, a return to the supportive intertwining of life and death. Clara appears at his bedside, and as he dies, relinquishing his anger, her spirit glows brighter. It is with Trueba’s death that Alba realizes she must forgive her father’s son, Esteban García, who raped her and whose child she may now be carrying. Death, then, seen through Clara’s eyes, is a comfort to the living and offers spiritual healing. For those wielding the weapons of destruction, it is punishment, a bitter finality without salvation. But, as the epilogue implies, the darkness of war cannot snuff out the light of hope. Anne Massey
Heroism in The House of the Spirits
The term heroism describes individuals who inspire others through physical, moral, or intellectual fortitude. In classical Greek and Roman literature, heroes not only possessed such strengths but also had a tragic flaw, some insurmountable internal element to remind them of their humanity and distinguish them from the omnipotent gods. The characters of The House of the Spirits are heroic in both the general and classical senses. Events in the opening chapter presage the heroic theme. Despite community disapproval, Clara speaks out against church oppression. Uncle Marcos’s behavior is reminiscent of Christ’s life. Marcos takes off in his flying contraption amid praise and the sprinkling of holy water, is forgotten after three days, and appears to die twice. Moreover, both he and Clara seem able to change fate. Esteban Trueba, Clara’s husband, sees himself as his family’s hero, lifting them out of poverty and rebuilding the family estate in what he declares to be a Herculean undertaking. Other characters demonstrate heroic traits. Clara’s mother is a suffragette. Férula, Trueba’s mother, caters to the poor and is described as sublimely heroic. The prostitute Tránsito Soto decides to overcome her fate as a streetwalker. The count de Satigny chivalrously rescues Blanca, who is pregnant with the child of her father’s enemy. Pedro Tercero
García is a hero of the socialist movement. Jaime, Clara’s son, gives away his clothes to the poor, while his brother, Nicolás, studies alternative medicine, eventually helping more people than his physician brother. Finally, Alba, Trueba’s granddaughter, opposes the military coup and is tortured for her efforts. However, among these characters, only Alba seems immune from the challenge of a tragic flaw. Clara’s clairvoyance is both a blessing and a shame. Marcos’s apparent double death is a case of mistaken identity rather than a resurrection and negates his godlike image. Esteban suffers from hubris, the Greek notion of excessive pride, which eventually destroys his work at Tres Marías and his relationships with those he loves the most. Nívea, Clara’s mother, is hypocritical, enjoying the comforts of the tearoom after charitable visits to the poor. Nívea also enjoys modern conveniences, such as cars that fly at a suicidal pace. Eventually, Nívea and her husband are killed in a car crash, dying from their attraction to modernity and wealth. Férula, despite her goodwill, lives in fear of her sexual fantasies, while Tránsito Soto, rather than escaping prostitution, turns the sex trade into a booming enterprise. Sex is also the count’s downfall. He loses everything when his wife discovers his pornographic photographs revealing his sexual obsession with his servants. Destruction arises out of other obsessions. Jaime’s charity is described as madness, a madness culminating in his death by a firing squad because of his socialist beliefs. More dramatic than Jaime’s death is his agreeing to perform an abortion on his brother’s girlfriend. He agrees out of his obsessive but unrequited love for the woman, even though the act contradicts his beliefs. In a separate series of events, Nicolás leaves home to find peace in Eastern spiritual practices, but he eventually sells his religion at the ironically named Institute for Union with Nothingness. The socialist fight is clearly a heroic effort, but Pedro Tercero García, despite his efforts, is plagued by human flaws. His love for Blanca outweighs his desire for justice. He allows her to hide him in the labyrinth of her home, even as he feels imprisoned there. Eventually, he allows his enemy, Trueba, to
The House of the Spiritsâ•…â•… 147 help him and Blanca flee into exile, away from the fight for human rights. Alba is the only character who manages to surmount her tragic nature. Raped and tortured for her part in the socialist rebellion, she survives because her grandfather intercedes on her behalf. She appears to reject her beliefs, succumbing to the temptation of wealth. But she is saved from tragic destruction by her decision to become an agent for change. Carrying a child whose father is either an extremist rebel or the man who tormented her in jail, Alba decides to break the chain of vengeance and to forgive her captor, ensuring a safe haven for her child no matter who the father is. As Alba observes, she is part of a grand design that determines her family’s fate. Because of fate, the heroes in The House of the Spirits are destined both to great and charitable acts and to their own destruction. Only Alba, whose name signifies dawn, is able to surmount her tragic flaw and offer hope. Anne Massey
Oppression in The House of the Spirits
It is no surprise that oppression is a major theme in Isabel Allende’s The House of the Spirits. Although no specific reference is made to the country or time frame in which the story is set, the reader can guess that the tale unfolds against the backdrop of Chile’s 1973 military coup, an event that established a regime known for torturing and eliminating those who opposed it. However, oppression in Allende’s work does not take place solely in the political realm; rather, it takes the form of religious, economic, sexual, and racial dominance. Political control is the novel’s most obvious form of oppression. In an effort to eradicate the socialist regime, the military tortures Alba. The Poet—a clear reference to Pablo Neruda, famous for both his political advocacy and his verses, many of which exemplified Marxist ideology—dies after political events, including the exile and assassination of his friends, exhaust his will to live. Jaime is interrogated before being killed by a firing squad. The novel opens with references to religious oppression. In church on Holy Thursday, the priest names the parishioners he believes to be sinners, and Clara and her family are ostracized after Clara,
during Mass, critiques the church’s take on hell. Even Father Restrepo feels the oppression of the church, observing that his wages appear to have been established by the Inquisition. Férula perceives her humble suffering in caring for her mother as a pathway to heaven, yet she blames her torturous existence and failure to marry on her mother. Férula, in turn, uses guilt and religion to control her brother, Esteban Trueba. When Trueba arrives home soaking wet after spilling a cup of Viennese coffee proudly purchased with his first paycheck, Férula warns him that God is punishing him for wasting their mother’s medicine money. And as a child, Trueba wore a rope of Saint Francis around his waist to symbolize the promises tying him to his mother and sister. Having grown up poor, Trueba feels the burden of economic oppression, but he overcomes this through his mining enterprise. He then proceeds to use his newfound power to dominate, through violence, the servants at Tres Marías. When two peasants are found dead, the community is certain that Trueba, the patrón, is culpable. In Trueba’s eyes, his workers are children, and he ignores pleas to offer them wages instead of shelter and vouchers for purchases at the company store. Trueba’s life at Tres Marías exemplifies sexual oppression. He rapes Pancha García and other women at both Tres Marías and neighboring haciendas. When Clara arrives at Tres Marías, she tries to spread her mother’s slogans of gender equality among the peasant women, but her ideas are met with laughter. The women tell Clara that men will always be in charge and that the men would beat them, and rightly so, for subscribing to Clara’s whims. The proof of the women’s words is seen in Trueba’s violence toward his wife. Angered, he attacks Clara. Ethnic dominance permeates life at Tres Marías. The servants and workers are perceived as children who would not survive without the landowner’s generosity. Pedro Segundo García, the hacienda’s foreman, knows that he will never confront the patrón, and Pancha García is merely seen as an instrument for Trueba’s physical relief at the end of the day. Blanca is forced to hide her relationship with Pedro Tercero García, a peasant, and is forced into an loveless marriage in order to hide her having become
148â•…â•… Alvarez, Julia pregnant with the offspring of such an unworthy suitor. Blanca’s husband, the count, oppresses the servants in his employ, forcing them to pose in lewd sexual acts for his photography. Of all the characters, only Clara avoids oppression, taking refuge in her magic and her aloofness. When her magical powers become the object of shame, she chooses not to speak. She endures her husband’s tirades and then responds with a ridiculous non sequitur that demonstrates her unflappable nature. When her husband hits her, she refuses to speak to him, an act that isolates her from his abuse. Finally, her labyrinth of a home and her ability to become part of the spirit world at will separates her from the oppressive reality surrounding her. She, unlike any other character in Allende’s work, avoids the political, sexual, religious, and economic dominance faced by the other characters by living in her own world—the house of the spirits. Anne Massey
ALVAREZ, JULIAâ•… How the García Girls Lost Their Accentsâ•… (1991)
Julia Alvarez (b. 1950) is best known for her first novel, How the García Girls Lost their Accents, which received the PEN Oakland/Josephine Miles Literary Award. Told chronologically backwards, the 15 stories tell of how the four García sisters leave their home in the Dominican Republic to be challenged in the United States through language, cultural difference, education, race, ethnicity, and gender. Alvarez’s novel introduces the reader to the quandary that faces the four García girls: how to “fit in” in American society while retaining a sense of their identity as Dominican women. The narrator changes in the 15 stories, thus allowing all four women to render their versions of what has happened between the time they lived in the Dominican Republic and their maturation into women in New York. The women write of their Latino family, their American friends and significant others, and their own identities as something in between. The chronological order reflects going back to their “roots” on the island in order to understand the people they have become. In the first story, one of the older
sisters returns to the island with the intention of remaining there. How the García Girls Lost Their Accents tells a funny but difficult story that examines the difficult issue of identity in a foreign land. Because this process is never a solitary one, it is fitting that the four sisters tell their stories together rather than as lone individuals. Nancy Cardona
The American Dream in How the García Girls Lost Their Accents
Most people believe that attainment of the American dream involves the acquisition of material objects. Julia Alvarez’s novel questions this notion, having her immigrant García family attain the American dream in terms of objects, but the dream eludes the family in terms of their ability to see themselves as wholly American. The García family begins their story in the Dominican Republic where they live a fairly privileged life. Mr. García owns a factory, and the families live behind compound walls in order to protect them from the disadvantaged. They have servants to cater to their every need, and some of the men in the family maintain two families. Even though the family lives with great privilege, they do so under Rafael Trujillo, the Dominican Republic’s ruthless dictator who ruled the island for more than 30 years. To escape the country’s dangerous political situation, Mr. García participates in the underground resistance movement and is given an opportunity to leave the island with his family via a CIA contact known as “Uncle Vic.” When they arrive in the United States, the family is poor, and they struggle to make ends meet despite the fact that Mr. García has been a successful businessman and has training as a doctor. The four daughters are given a stereotypical American childhood, wearing braces to “straighten their teeth” and “smooth[ing] the accent out of their English in expensive schools.” If anything, Mr. García believes that his ability to provide this kind of childhood to his daughters has actually distanced them from him. One daughter elopes with a German man, two of them get divorces, while the last one suffers a nervous breakdown. The attainment of the American
How the García Girls Lost Their Accentsâ•…â•… 149 dream seems to have worked against the four García “girls,” rather than helped them. What the four García women have learned is that there are inconsistencies in the American dream. As Sandra learns early on, looking like an American does not mean that you are accepted as one. “Being pretty, she [Sandra] would not have to go back where she came from. Pretty spoke both languages. Pretty belonged in this country .╯.╯.” This is despite Sandra’s own experiences with children at school who shout at her, “Spics! Go back to where you came from!” The women’s ability to attain the American dream is not enough to make them feel “American.” Emphasizing just how foreign the girls feel, upon the family’s first anniversary in the United States, Carla wishes that they be allowed to return to the Dominican Republic. The one thing that gives Carla solace in this foreign land is her family, including those she left behind on the island. When she recalls those children who chase her, screaming that she “Go back! Go back!,” she recites to herself “the names of her own sisters, for all those she wanted God to especially care for, here and back home. The seemingly endless list of familiar names would coax her back to sleep with a feeling of safety, of a world still peopled by those who love her.” The attainment of the American dream, therefore, has nothing to do with material objects that can be photographed. Rather, the women must learn to own themselves and their culture, even as it might be rejected by “real Americans.” Nancy Cardona
Gender in How the García Girls Lost Their Accents
Julia Alvarez’s novel describes the lives of four Dominican daughters of a man who escaped the Trujillo regime to relocate in the United States. While they are all “strong” women in their own rights, each one struggles with how to be a “good” woman. Over the course of the novel, Alvarez describes two major obstacles that these women struggle with as they grow up: First, how do they become American women when they are foreigners, and second, how do they balance the values with
which they have been raised and their desires to be “American” women? One of the first major struggles that the García women must confront is their status as “outsiders” as they are born in the Dominican Republic and yet are raised in the United States. Sandra, the secondborn daughter, struggles with this while in graduate school. Shortly after the family arrives in the United States, they go out to dinner with another family that is helping them. She stops in the bathroom to look at herself in the mirror and observes that “she was surprised to find a pretty girl looking back at her. It was a girl who could pass as American, with soft blue eyes and fair skin .╯.╯.” (emphasis added). Here, Sandra begins to understand the importance of looking like an American. She believes that “looking” American is a key to being accepted as one. However, this initial understanding betrays her when she is in graduate school and innocently goes on a diet because she wants to “look like those twiggy models. She was a looker, that one.” Sandra’s desire to emulate the American epitome of beauty, in this case a physically thin woman, becomes a struggle for her mental stability. Instead of succeeding with the diet and becoming a confident, self-assured woman, Sandra has a nervous breakdown, believing that she is slowly devolving and will become a monkey. Her inability to truly embody this beauty ideal leads to her mental collapse. The second struggle is related to the first. Even as the four García women may consider themselves to be wholly American women, how do others perceive them? This theme is explored in Yolanda’s story. At several junctures in the novel, she must contend with others’ perceptions of her as a Latina in terms of her sexuality and the reality of how she sees herself. As her college boyfriend, Rudy Elmhurst, says, he expects her to “be all hot-blooded, being Spanish and all, and that.╯.╯.╯. [Y]ou’d be really free, instead of all hung up.╯.╯.╯. [Y]ou’re worse than a .╯.╯. Puritan.” Rudy’s expectations of Yolanda have more to do with his own stereotypes about Latinas than about who Yolanda is. Yolanda, like many college-age people, is torn between the woman she wishes to become (a liberated woman who makes decisions for herself ) versus the woman she has been
150â•…â•… Amis, Kingsley trained to be (a good Catholic girl who is deferential to her husband). Even as an adult, Yolanda continues to struggle with this stereotypical understanding of who she should be. Her partner at one point explains that he feels “caught between the women’s libber and the Catholic señorita.” This struggle between her “morals” of chastity before marriage and rejecting those values because they oppress women plagues Yolanda in her struggle to be her own woman. Indeed, as the novel opens, she has returned to the Dominican Republic in the hope of symbolically returning to the person she left behind. What she hopes for is to attain the same “authority in their voices” that her Dominican aunts and cousins have. But in order to do that, Yolanda knows that she must be able to “let the mighty wave of tradition roll on through her life and break on some other female shore.” If Yolanda were to be able to do that, she would have to make a choice between the two women that she is aspires to be rather than to find a way to combine these identities. Nancy Cardona
Tradition in How the García Girls Lost Their Accents
Julia Alvarez’s novel about four Dominican women who arrive in the United States as girls explores the clash of traditions as the girls grow up straddling two cultures. The novel begins with the third daughter, Yolanda, as she travels to the Dominican Republic in an effort to return to her “roots.” But this return is more about how the women have dealt with the traditions with which they were raised, as the novel shows how the women have strayed from these roots even as they believe they are held hostage to them. Yolanda’s return to the island illustrates her discomfort with the tradition that the island represents. Although she hopes to be able to return to the island permanently, she recognizes that this move will be difficult, as she thinks that she has learned “at last, to let the mighty wave of tradition roll on through her life and break on some other female shore.” In many ways, Yolanda idealizes the island and the life it represents, as she can only see the struggle that she and her sisters have waged in order to fit in in the United
States. Her parents, too, idealize the island, sending their daughters there for the summer to ensure they do not become too Americanized. Over the course of the novel, the reader sees that the four daughters struggle with sex and sexuality, ethnicity, and language. The first stems from a number of different sources, but other characters in the novel all seem to believe that it is a combination of ethnicity and religion that forbid them from being true to themselves sexually. As one of Yolanda’s lovers notes, he “[feels] caught between the woman’s libber and the Catholic señorita.” These two identities focus on the clash between the two traditions with which the women have been raised, an understanding of the status of women based on U.S. standards and those of the Dominican Republic. It is this ability to live up to these two standards that causes problems for Sandra. She can “pass” as a woman of European ancestry with her fair complexion and blue eyes, but even she cannot escape the feeling of being between two cultures. When she is in graduate school, Sandra suffers a nervous breakdown, eventually starving herself by feeding herself with books, believing that she is becoming a monkey. Her crisis is one of feeling fully human. Sandra’s breakdown symbolizes the women’s struggle with language as well. Language becomes a marker of inclusion that allows the women to be fully accepted as Americans. When Yolanda is dating a young man in college, his parents note that Yolanda does not have an accent, which would mark her as an outsider, a foreigner. As the narrator explains, their accents had been “ironed out.” At one point, language is seen as a comforter, a place of safety, where others cannot “catch” her. Nancy Cardona
AMIS, KINGSLEYâ•… Lucky Jimâ•… (1954)
Kingsley Amis’s first novel, Lucky Jim, remains one of his best-known works as well as a superb example of the comedic novel of manners. Published in 1954, Lucky Jim is often credited, along with Mary McCarthy’s Groves of Academe (1952) and Randall Jarrell’s Pictures of an Institution (1954), as crystallizing the form of the academic novel genre, particu-
Lucky Jimâ•…â•… 151 larly in its use of satire to critique and ridicule higher education. Equally, it is credited with instigating the “angry young man” movement in the 1950s that also included the writers John Osborne, Alan Sillitoe, and Colin Wilson. Amis’s protagonist, Jim Dixon, encapsulates the “angry young man” with his biting sarcastic attitude, especially in response to the overt class inequities and foibles lampooned by the novel. In his first year as a junior lecturer of history at a provincial, “red-brick” English university in the postwar period, Dixon is forced to pander to his absentminded, socially and culturally pretentious supervisor, Professor Welch. Much of the charm of Lucky Jim resides in following Dixon’s internal commentary and fantasies of revenge on those he encounters, especially Welch and his family. The novel follows Dixon’s comic exploits as he struggles with his job, his students, his would-be girlfriend, and the entire social fabric of postwar Britain. Set against the background of the university and Dixon’s attempt to secure a job he is not even sure he desires, Lucky Jim deals with such themes as work, social class, and education. Eric Leuschner
Education in Lucky Jim
As one of the first widely acknowledged academic novels, Kingsley Amis’s Lucky Jim features the exploits and misadventures of a university faculty member in an educational system that has become the target of satire and ridicule. The description of the unnamed university that serves as the novel’s setting demonstrates the changing views of academia: “An ill-kept lawn ran down in front of them to a row of amputated railings, beyond which was College Road and the town cemetery, a conjunction responsible for some popular local jokes.” But it is the characters that best serve the novel’s satirical purposes, particularly the contrasting figures of Jim Dixon and Professor Welch. The novel’s protagonist, Jim Dixon, is a newly hired junior history professor at a provincial British university. Unlike many of his older colleagues, Dixon hails from a working-class family and background and so feels he does not fit in with the other faculty, subscribing neither to the social nor the cultural values of the Oxford or Cambridge set. From
the beginning, Dixon challenges the traditional educational culture of the university, even choosing his specialization in medieval history because it was a “soft option in the Leicester course,” not because of any real interest. He admits to a policy of reading “as little as possible of any given book” and has violent fantasies of what he might do to his superior. He has little regard for even his own academic research, the title of which, “The Economic Influence of the Developments in Shipbuilding Techniques, 1450– 1485,” reflects what Dixon describes as the “niggling mindlessness” of such scholarship. Yet he places his future hopes in attempting to get it published and is elated when he receives a vague promise of a publication by a new journal, even though the letter is addressed to “J. Dickinson” instead of “Dixon.” Desiring some sense of stability and job security, Dixon plays the game with halfhearted teaching and research and continual attempts to socialize and to please Welch and his ilk as he participates in university politics. As the novel’s major antagonist, Professor Welch epitomizes the absent-minded, stodgy, overly pretentious academic. In the novel’s introductory scene, Dixon notes that “no other professor in Great Britain, he thought, set such store by being called Professor.” Dixon even questions Welch’s qualifications: “How had he become Professor of History, even at a place like this? By published work? No. By extra good teaching? No in italics.” Dixon leaves the question unanswered, recognizing the fact that Welch ultimately possesses the power to control his future. What Welch and his family, in particular his dilettante sons Bertrand the painter and Michel the writer, also possess, however, is a cultural affectation that consistently irks Dixon’s working-class sensibilities. Welch constantly talks about performing Renaissance music at his home with colleagues and friends and even attributes to his home “some sort of healing effect,” undoubtedly caused by the apparent cultured ethos. Even though Dixon attempts to endear himself to Welch in order to be retained on the faculty, the sincerity of Welch’s concern is often questioned, particularly as he, similar to the journal editor, mistakenly addresses Dixon as Faulkner, Dixon’s predecessor in the position, several times.
152â•…â•… Amis, Kingsley The novel’s climax, Dixon’s drunken lecture on “Merrie England,” encapsulates the contrast between the characters and the satire on education. Standing to deliver the lecture, Dixon begins with a “preludial blaring sound” imitative of one of Welch’s habitual mannerisms. Partly unconsciously, partly in an attempt to placate Welch, he further imitates Welch’s manner of speech: “He’d inserted an ‘of course’ here, a ‘you see’ there, an ‘as you might call it’ somewhere else; nothing so firmly recalled Welch as that sort of thing.” In a pointed jab at academic speech (as represented by Welch), Dixon also uses “a number of favourite Welch tags: ‘integration of the social consciousness,’ ‘identification of work with craft,’ and so on.” Trying to break the imitation of Welch, Dixon begins to sound like the university principal, then affects an “exaggerated northern accent,” followed in turn by someone sounding like “an unusually fanatical Nazi trooper in charge of a book-burning reading out to the crowd excerpts from a pamphlet written by a pacifist, Jewish, literate Communist,” and finally speaking in an “unnameable foreign accent╯.╯.╯.╯punctuating his discourse with smothered snorts of derision╯.╯.╯.╯spitting out the syllables like curses, leaving mispronunciations, omissions, spoonerisms uncorrected.” Dixon’s speech (in his description, “conjectural, nugatory, deluded, tedious rubbish”) critiques the nostalgia-infused, nonworldly nature of higher education and ensures his dismissal. However, in the end Dixon finds himself in better company outside the university, concluding the novel’s negative assessment of the world of higher education. Eric Leuschner
Social Class in Lucky Jim
Although Kingsley Amis, in a letter written in 1986, denied the suggestion that Lucky Jim was intended as a critique of the class conflict in postwar Britain and was never comfortable with his identification with the “angry young man” movement, it is difficult not to read the novel without seeing such characters as Professor Welch and his son Bertrand as being caricatures of a pretentious, class-conscious type or Jim Dixon as the reactionary working-class hero. As a comedy of manners, Lucky Jim’s humor
stems directly from its targeting of social foibles and behaviors. The novel opens with a conversation between Dixon and Professor Welch that encapsulates Welch’s characterization as someone obsessed with trivialities, testifying to a snobbish, pseudo-cultured person. Recalling a Post review of a recital, Welch notes that the “reporter chap” mistakenly stated that the concert was for “flute and piano,” not “recorder and piano.” Opening with Welch’s long-winded explanation of the difference between a flute and recorder immediately establishes Welch as knowledgeable, but it is evident that this type of knowledge is not useful. Later, after Welch goes on about the welfare state, “so-called freedom of education,” and retributive punishment to Dixon while driving, Dixon looks at the window and sees his barber, for whom he “felt a deep respect” because of “his impressive exterior, his rumbling bass voice, and his unsurpassable stock of information about the Royal Family.” For Dixon, the low-brow gossip trumps the niggling distinction between recorder and flute. Not only is Professor Welch, with his passion for amateur musicals, singled out for criticism, but his sons are as well, especially Bertrand. Tagged as elitist, Bertrand affects a cultured and cosmopolitan attitude, which consistently irritates Dixon. While the primary conflict between Dixon and Bertrand is over Christine Callaghan, the tension between the two results from the difference between appearance and reality. In one of their final confrontations, Dixon calls Bertrand on his behavior: You think that just because you’re tall and can put paint on canvas you’re a sort of demigod. It wouldn’t be so bad if you really were. But you’re not: you’re a twister and a snob and a bully and a fool. You think you’re sensitive, but you’re not: your sensitivity only works for things that people do to you. Touchy and vain, yes, but not sensitive.” Primarily, the criticism in store for Welch and his family lies in their pretentiousness, summed up most succinctly in their affected clothing choices. From the beginning, Professor Welch is seen wearing a fishing hat, despite the fact that he is never seen
Lucky Jimâ•…â•… 153 actually fishing or even discussing fishing. Just as he has a romanticized view of “Merrie Old England,” he has a certain condescending attitude toward the rural life. Likewise, Bertrand is never seen without his blue beret. Although Welch’s fishing hat suggests some practical purpose, Bertrand’s beret is simply faux artistic pretension. Upon seeing the beret, Dixon wonders, “If such headgear was a protection, what was it a protection against? If it wasn’t a protection, what was it? What was it for? What was it for?” Ultimately, the criticism of the class represented by the Welches falls to the pragmatic aspect, and the symbolism of the hats is reinforced by the concluding scene when Dixon and Christine spy the Welches on the street; they are wearing the hats, but now Bertrand is wearing the fishing hat and the professor is wearing the beret, as if they are interchangeable. Welch’s other son, the conspicuously absent Michel, who is usually denigrated as the “effeminate writing son,” is finally present and is wearing, in contrast, a pale corduroy cap. While the reader is never sure about Michel, this detail suggests that he somehow differs from his father and brother and is perhaps actually cultured and artistically sensible. In contrast to the Welches, who represent the worst of the aristocratic class, Christine suggests that there is not a simple opposition between the classes. When Dixon first meets Christine, he reacts ambivalently, put off by his own class consciousness: “The sight of her seemed an irresistible attack on his own habits, standards, and ambitions: something designed to put him in his place for good.” Yet she turns out to be the most earnest character in the novel. While Dixon assumes she’s associated with the ballet, in fact she works in a bookshop, and her dress is consistently plain and unostentatious. Like her uncle, Gore-Urquhart, she avoids the excesses of the upper-class society while maintaining the most genuine claim. Eric Leuschner
Work in Lucky Jim
Set in the period immediately following World War II, Lucky Jim witnesses the transformation of the concept of work in British society. Primarily, Kingsley Amis contrasts the ineffectual, elitist idea of academic work with the more real work of business and
industry. In the 1980s, David Lodge, one of Amis’s literary heirs with the academic novel, picks up the contrast between types of work with his aptly titled novel Nice Work (1988) as he describes the interactions between a university professor and an engineer. As Lucky Jim follows the exploits of Jim Dixon, a junior lecturer of history at a provincial British university, Dixon’s academic work is characterized as marginal and worthless. Dixon has little interest in the research he is engaged with, describing its “niggling mindlessness” and “its funereal parade of yawn-enforcing facts.” For Dixon, the problem is so far removed from any real concern that it is essentially a “non-problem.” Yet it is in line with all the other published research he is familiar with, all “convinced of its own usefulness and significance.” Even Dixon’s superior, Professor Welch, cannot judge the work on its own merits and must rely on its acceptance in an academic journal, no matter how obscure, for a sense of worth. One subplot of the novel concerns Dixon’s attempts to forestall the demands of one of his students, who repeatedly pesters him about an upcoming seminar. Dixon’s avoidance stems from his own uncertainty about his capabilities on the subject as well as his disdain for the work itself. The irony of his academic work is revealed when the research project on medieval shipbuilding techniques he submitted to a journal is plagiarized by the journal’s editor, who uses it to be hired as a department chair at another university. In a similar way, Professor Welch represents the elitist idea of the university and its work. Welch promotes himself as a cultural connoisseur, hosting weekends at his country home, where visitors participate in impromptu madrigal singing. Despite his bluster about traditional, ruralized England, Welch’s work habits are less than hardy. At the beginning, Dixon wonders how he achieved and maintains his position at the university, as he neither teaches well nor publishes. Even academic work is absent from Welch. Welch’s seeming hypocrisy runs the other way as well, as symbolized by the fishing hat that he wears even though he does not do the work of fishing, either. The characterization of Bertram, Welch’s eldest son, also suggests Amis’s critique of work. Asked by Dixon about his “work,” Bertram, the socially superior, cosmopolitan-styled artist,
154â•…â•… Anaya, Rudolfo answers that he is a painter, but he is quick to qualify his answer by distancing his painting from any sense of practicality: he does not paint houses, nor does he paint “pictures of trade unionists or town halls.” For Bertram, the goal of art should not be political or useful. His paintings range from an eight-foot nude whom he describes as a “real smasher” and a self-portrait set against a brick wall (“more wall than Welch”) to a small painting just started of three workman in a pub reading a newspaper. The trivialization of the latter subject reiterates the Welches’ disdain for actual work. On the other hand, Julius Gore-Urquhart appears to represent an opposing conception of work. Although the novel indicates that GoreUrquhart is a member of the upper class, there is the sense that there is something more substantial to him that the class snobbery of the Welches. While Gore-Urquhart possesses formal, refined manners (“quite the real thing,” according to Margaret), he is also marked by his accent and accepted demeanor of a Scottish lowlander. It is the job of personal assistant to Gore-Urquhart in London that appeals to Bertram throughout the novel, but it is clear that Bertram believes that the job would not entail much work. In the end, however, Dixon gets the job after he is fired from the university and freed from its odd conception of work. Discussing his position in the university earlier, Gore-Urquhart diagnoses Dixon’s unhappiness with the position: “Where’s the trouble? In you or in it?” His question suggests that there is a very real concern with a personal propensity for work, but at the same time, there is an understanding that some jobs are not worthwhile. Dixon’s reply encapsulates the attitude toward effectual and ineffectual work as he claims that it is both: “They waste my time and I waste theirs.” When Gore-Urquhart offers Dixon the job, he notes that many have the qualifications for a job, but few do not have the disqualifications, referring offhandedly to Bertram. The novel does not make clear that the job with Gore-Urquhart will be any more satisfactory for Dixon than his previous position, but GoreUrquhart’s lack of pretension contrasts completely with Welch and academia. Eric Leuschner
ANAYA, RUDOLFOâ•… Bless Me, Ultimaâ•… (1972)
Rudolfo Anaya’s Bless Me, Ultima has been extremely popular—and controversial—since its publication at the inception of the Chicano arts movement. Celebrating a rich continuum of ancient indigenous Southwest/Mexican cultural inheritances, along with innovations in language, art, and spiritual expression, Chicano artists and writers like Anaya (b. 1937) rebelled against the previous erasure of Hispanic American history and culture in U.S. arts and education. Set in rural New Mexico during World War II, Bless Me, Ultima is reminiscent of Anaya’s own childhood. Six-year-old Antonio, confronted by identity conflict within his family and community, discovers his true self with the help of the curandera (midwife/spiritual healer) Ultima. Against the proscriptive Catholic Church, which controls the pious farmers (represented by Antonio’s mother’s family) and the equally limiting “cowboy” mentality of the vaqueros (represented by Antonio’s father’s kin), Anaya suggests through Antonio’s tale a new cultural frame of mind rooted in the spiritual “presence” of nature, a way of thinking and being that resists labels and restrictions on personal free will. Bless Me, Ultima received the prestigious Premio Quinto Sol literary award in 1972, but the novel has also been censored in several municipalities in the United States—burned or otherwise disposed of— as recently as 2005. It appeared on the American Library Association’s most commonly challenged books of 1990–2000. The young boys’ innocent use of certain curse words in Spanish and the discussion of witchcraft have been considered threatening by some community leaders, who may also object to Antonio’s ambiguous, independent spirituality in the novel. Elizabeth McNeil
Coming of Age in Bless Me, Ultima
Published during the final years of the Vietnam War, Rudolfo Anaya’s Bless Me, Ultima is set during World War II in a New Mexico mestizo (SpanishIndian) community at odds with itself as well as with the greater Anglo society. The novel’s coming-
Bless Me, Ultimaâ•…â•… 155 of-age theme works on several levels. Through the six-year-old protagonist, Antonio, Anaya affirms a new Chicano literary, social, and spiritual identity for the individual and community. In addition, Anaya’s Chicano cultural assertion echoes the work of the multiple other counterculture movements during the civil rights era that similarly sought to draw out the widely various narratives comprising American experience. Antonio’s family has settled by the river, which serves as a liminal border between the llano (plain) and the town. Antonio is caught in a tug of war between the values and lifestyle of his vaquero (cowboy) father, a member of the Márez family (mar meaning the sea, which represents the bold seafaring Spanish conquistadores and the open life of the llano), and farmer mother, a Luna (luna, the moon, is indicative of peaceful indigenous farmers in tune with planting cycles dictated by the moon). His father wants Antonio to grow up to work livestock from horseback, free on the llano, while his pious mother, who cries every time she thinks Antonio might choose his father’s Márez ways, wants him to become a priest, to help the villagers. Mature for his age, Antonio clearly is not attracted to the macho life of the vaqueros and sees hypocrisies in the Catholic religion. Although he desires a life in relationship to family and community, Antonio does not seem destined to become a vaquero, farmer, or priest. In order to widen and complicate his protagonist’s (and reader’s) choices of identity, Anaya constructs an alternative in the person of the aged curandera Ultima, who has been invited to live out the end of her life with Antonio’s family. Ultima’s authority and wisdom come in large part from her knowledge of and relationship to nature. Townspeople who fear her power call her a bruja (witch), though they also turn to her when the evil actions of real brujas cannot be dispelled by the Catholic priest. As the midwife who helped Antonio into the world, Ultima is cognizant of the forces at play on the occasion of his birth and the identities afforded him, including what she offers. Living with the family, she helps Antonio to discern more than just the obvious choices of his dual competing lineages, and to reach deeper into the wisdom and
magic all around him in nature—especially via his observances of the mythic wisdom of the “Golden Carp” in the river. Antonio comes of age through various encounters with death, danger, nature, spirituality/the supernatural, sex and sexuality, and Catholicism. Ultima consistently reminds him that life cannot be reduced to dualistic good-bad/either-or Western/ Christian thinking; life is, instead, an interconnected cycle of existence that binds one and all. Under Ultima’s calm tutelage, Antonio will grow up to become a new kind of leader following a new religion rooted in nature, healing, and peacemaking. Anaya suggests that the only way the adult Antonio can care for the world is to be at peace in himself, and the only way to be at peace (which his parents and the other townspeople are clearly not) is to be aligned with the real authority of nature rather than with abstract Catholic dogma. Antonio’s coming of age is tied to various values of the Chicano movement: the love and support of family; the presence of and belief in the land; a sense of human dignity in all social strata; and a grace that is rooted in nature and the human body, neither any longer viewed as vile or uncontrolled and in need of conquering, as European Christian colonialism had insisted were intrinsically true of the “New World” and her indigenous inhabitants. At the time of Bless Me, Ultima’s publication, the United States was involved in yet another war (Vietnam), and the cold war’s threat of nuclear annihilation was still looming. Liberal members of society recognized nature as the ultimate authority that could bring humanity back to its senses. Bless Me, Ultima is set during World War II, which means Antonio’s vision would be mature by the time of the peace, environmental, and civil rights movements of the 1960s and 1970s. As an adult, then, Antonio’s leadership and cultural contributions—like that of Anaya and of Anaya’s readers—could help awaken others to a peaceful recognition and appreciation of the diverse American story. Elizabeth McNeil
Family in Bless Me, Ultima
In keeping with the primary importance of la familia in Hispanic American life, immediate and
156â•…â•… Anaya, Rudolfo extended family are the focus of Rudolfo Anaya’s Bless Me, Ultima. The parents of the six-year-old protagonist, Antonio, are opposites in terms of their own upbringing, and both familial lines attempt to influence Antonio’s future. Antonio’s mother comes from pious Catholic peasant farmers who insist the boy must become a priest. On the other hand, Antonio’s father’s kin, restless vaqueros who claim descent from Spanish conquistadores, want him to be like them, macho, freedom-loving cowboys. In the novel, the Márez family is a microcosm representing conflicting pressures to conform to colonial European and modern Anglo influences, all of which threaten the centrality, solidarity, spiritual essence, and continuity of la familia, and so of the individual. Demonstrating a new (though ancient) way of being to readers, Anaya’s young protagonist rejects the opposing life paths presented to him in favor of the much more encompassing earth-oriented spirituality and healing practice of the ancient curandera Ultima, who was there at Antonio’s birth and who has now come to live out her remaining days with the family. Anaya’s suggestion of a place-based mystical connection unmitigated by colonial social institutions, like the Catholic Church, or modern-day Anglo capitalist influences is an important statement of identity politics that helped make Bless Me, Ultima a hallmark text of the burgeoning Chicano civil rights movement of 1970s America. The novel is set at the end of World War II, after the confrontation between (and new confluences resulting from the contact of ) American subcultures, as well as world populations and cultures, that occurred because of the war. Early in the novel, having survived the global slaughter intact, Antonio’s three older brothers arrive home. The war, they admit, has made them men too soon. After returning home, the promise of decadent pleasures to which they had become accustomed as soldiers (for example, alcohol and prostitution) make them reject the boredom of small-town living, along with their father’s dreams of establishing a family vineyard in California. For these young men, their family focus and perhaps, Anaya strongly suggests, even their spirits have been lost to the “war sickness.” Feeling hemmed in by their father’s expectations, they fragment the family by restlessly seeking fulfillment in
urban living, rather than in the hard work and unity of la familia and the land. Antonio’s sisters, like his older brothers, have learned English and Anglo culture in school and are thus, Anaya shows, at a remove from the language and heritage of their family and home. However, Antonio himself, who begins to attend school during the time span of the novel, resists the loss of identity he innocently observes in his beloved brothers and distanced sisters, instead finding a selfdefining rootedness in the “presence” of the river and land through Ultima’s clarifying guidance. The character of Ultima speaks to the importance of indigenous cultural heritage that predates brutal colonial influences, a sense of belonging to the land and, by extension, to one’s natural (as opposed to culturally constructed) self. The sense of personal autonomy creates a sense of peace in the novel that also equates to a supremely strong and effective resistance to evil, as demonstrated by Ultima’s protective actions on behalf of the family—especially Antonio—and greater community. Loyalty, respect, and an acknowledgement of human interdependence are the marks of the extended familial connections Anaya emphasizes through Ultima’s physical and spiritual work in the community. Every community needs its seers, its prognosticators who are so sensitive to occurrences and relationships in the present that they can foretell and therefore positively guide the people’s future. In Bless Me, Ultima, Antonio is already astonishingly insightful and emotionally strong for his six-plus years. His spiritual receptivity and the promise of his leadership abilities as he matures suggest a new mystic awareness of self powerfully connected to indigenous beliefs and the land itself. This earthly appreciation of Chicano identity and purpose in the new generation of leaders would, as Anaya and other visionaries of the Chicano movement emphatically suggested, allow Mexican Americans to confront the degrading influences of Anglo culture that threaten Chicanos’ daily survival and, even more important, cultural autonomy. Instead, Bless Me, Ultima, as a key text in the great range of literature, oral performance, visual and public art, and music produced by Chicanos during and since the civil rights era, has
Winesburg, Ohioâ•…â•… 157 offered a renewed sense of pride in la raza (the race) and its most intrinsic unit, la familia. Elizabeth McNeil
Spirituality in Bless Me, Ultima
The most intense theme in Bless Me, Ultima is the definition of one’s own spirituality. Although the protagonist, Antonio, is only six years old—which is extremely young for a coming-of-age novel— Rodolfo Anaya convincingly represents the tender, gifted psyche of the young protagonist and his spiritual awakening. The story is also convincing because Antonio does not undergo his transformation to independent spiritual selfhood alone. He is guided by the powerful curandera Ultima, who had helped bring Antonio into the world. Immediately following Antonio’s birth, the two factions of his family—the pious Catholic peasant farmers on his mother’s side, and on his father’s side the lusty, freedom-loving vaqueros—had begun warring over Antonio’s destiny. Ultima had stopped the fighting, firmly asserting that only she knew his destiny, a proclamation that plays out over the course of the novel. Representing the dual strands of Chicano identity, Antonio and his family live between two worlds in a number of ways, including the spiritual orientations of the parents’ disparate upbringings. The family’s home is situated near the river, set off on its own between the town and the llano. The children speak only Spanish before they begin their schooling, and in school will be forced to speak only English. Antonio’s mother hopes he will become a priest, and his father dreams this youngest son will travel west with him—as his older sons have refused to do—to make it big in the vineyards of California. As the novel opens, it is immediately clear that, although Antonio’s free, pure spirit is at imminent risk, his innocence and openness to the world are still intact. He is just beginning to attend school, where the language and culture of his upbringing will be replaced by English and by Anglo knowledge, and he has not yet been subsumed by the Catholic Church’s intense behavioral restrictions and attendant shame and guilt. When Ultima, who is reaching the end of her life, comes to live with the family, her renewed con-
nection to Antonio is something the still spiritually receptive young boy has been expecting. Ultima becomes Antonio’s guide as he learns the magic and peace of nature, a commonsensical knowledge base that also allows him to begin to understand the life-and-death struggles of the adults around him who are affected by war sickness (a spiritually nullifying stress that drives one man from the town to commit a random murder, thereby setting himself up to be killed as a result); the clash of indigenous and colonial ways of being, and conflicting Hispanic and Anglo cultural expectations; and, as represented especially by Antonio’s father, the people’s lack of access to the (Anglo) American dream of unlimited prosperity. Antonio is not pulled to either his mother’s or his father’s hopes for his future, nor does he feel the need to strike out on his own and abandon the family, as have his older brothers, who grew up too quickly through their involvement in the many ugly facets of World War II. With the gentle guidance of Ultima, six-year-old Antonio finds his identity and purpose in the powerful “presence” of the river and the mystic golden carp. Nature, Ultima, and Antonio’s strong sense of place all guide him to his destiny, which is to love life in spite of the tragic obstacles that are put in his path—to remain spiritually strong, in other words, no matter the circumstances. Antonio’s discovery of a spiritual identity that is rooted in nature and indigenous mysticism suggests an alternative to both the submissive Catholicism that rules the humble farmers’ lives and the spiritual void of the lustful vaqueros who revel in their descent from the brutal conquistadores. Through his protagonist’s spirituality, which is independent of Catholic dogma or the hypocrisy of some of its practitioners, Anaya emphasizes that metaphysical strength comes from an autonomous spirit that is connected to the land. Elizabeth McNeil
ANDERSON, SHERWOODâ•… Winesburg, Ohioâ•… (1919)
Winesburg, Ohio, is a cycle comprising 21 short stories plus one prefatory story, “The Book of the Grotesque.” That initial story introduces the concept that runs through the rest of the stories: People
158â•…â•… Anderson, Sherwood dominated by one idea become grotesque, even if that one idea is true. The stories, each focusing on a particular resident, comprise a mini-population or representation of the town itself. Because Winesburg, Ohio, is of the genre of a short-story cycle, the stories within it are bound to each other by many similarities, repetitions, and links. One link is the presence of writers among the characters. “The Book of the Grotesque” relates the dream an old writer had about the transformation of truths and people into grotesques. George Willard, a young man who figures in many of the stories, wants to be a writer. Other realizations by the characters include repeated instances of women being disappointed by men, by sex and sexuality, by romantic relationships, and by marriage. These women include George’s mother as well as Louise Bentley. However, two female characters without a male partner, Louise Trunnion and Kate Swift, are also disappointed. Finally, many male characters also express disappointment about their relationships with women. In a few instances, male and female characters achieve temporary communication: George’s mother with her male doctor; George with Helen Foster, the girl he loves. However, George’s mother fails to communicate her dying wish to George—that he make use of money she has hidden in the plaster wall at the foot of her bed—and Helen White fails to say goodbye to George at the railway station. Natalie Tarenko
Coming of Age in Winesburg, Ohio
In the next-to-last story in Winesburg, Ohio, coming of age is defined as “Sophistication,” in the story of that title. Within “Sophistication,” coming of age is further defined and refined as a young person’s epiphany or realization about the nature of time and self. Time, which brought the young person to this realization, will continue to pass, like leaves blown by the wind or like corn that will be cut down. So, also, will the life of the young person someday end; and so, too, have the lives ended of all the people who have ever lived. Specifically, the young person is George Willard. Winesburg, Ohio, largely tells the circumstances that brought George to this state of “sophistication.” In
many of Winesburg’s stories, other characters think back to their own epiphanies or realizations; usually, they feel compelled to tell George about it. Some characters try to wake him up: his father; Tom Foster; and his former teacher, Kate Swift. Each intends to wake George up to a different reality: his father to the sharpness required of a successful businessman, Kate Swift to a writer’s use of words. In addition, George’s mother seeks to save him from her own fate: not to be a failure by killing or allowing one’s youthful dreams to be killed. George dreams of being a writer and often boasts about how easy a life it will be. George’s naïveté is dangerous in that the narrative shows that words can be empty. One character who never has a coming of age, who never grows up, is Enoch Robinson (“Loneliness”). Even though old, he is childlike in preferring his made-up people to real ones, such as his wife and children, whom he had earlier abandoned. The danger of becoming mesmerized by one’s own words and ideas is underlined by the parallels between Enoch, who talks to himself, and George, who also often talks to himself and imagines himself in grandiose situations. George Willard is not the only character who gropes toward adulthood. Tom Foster also tries to learn things from and about life, which is another description of coming of age. Tom has fewer material resources than George, who has a satisfying job on the town newspaper and his father’s sometimes meddlesome conniving to help him. Tom sets out to get drunk, just once, so as to feel pain and grow from it; his language expands, and he is quite poetic in the metaphors he creates about Helen White, whom many of the young male characters love. In the last story of the book, “Departure,” George succeeds in leaving Winesburg; getting away from his hometown is another aspect of coming of age. Other young characters, such as Seth Richmond, also express interest in leaving town, possibly symbolizing leaving their childhood. Natalie Tarenko
Family in Winesburg, Ohio
In many of the stories in Winesburg, Ohio, an unhappy family can be the unfortunate result of the misunderstandings of coming of age. Women, in
Winesburg, Ohioâ•…â•… 159 particular, are led by society to believe that they can find what they long for by becoming involved with a man. However, male characters also feel misled or “tricked” (204), as Ray Pearson terms it in “The Untold Lie.” “Mother” is an early story in the sequence. “Mother” concerns Elizabeth Willard, the mother of the male protagonist, George Willard, who is the novice reporter to whom many of the characters relate their grotesquely obsessive ideas. In her girlhood, Elizabeth had been restless and longed to go on the stage, but because these longings were thwarted, she channeled them into encounters with men. One of these men, Tom Willard, became her husband in an unhappy marriage; together, they are the parents of George. In some of the stories in Winesburg, Ohio, the frustrated parent figure transfers his or her thwarted hopes onto another generation. In “Mother,” Elizabeth Willard hopes that her son George will achieve some of the transcendent longings she has failed to achieve. George’s father, too, has transferred some of his unrealized political ambitions onto George. However, George rejects his father’s more commonplace ambitions for power and status. The frustrated parent can transfer his or her thwarted hopes onto his or her offspring with such vehemence that the child is terrified by the parent figure. In “Godliness II,” David Hardy is the grandson of Jesse Bentley, a successful farmer who had longed for a son instead of his daughter, who became David’s mother. One of the ideas that dominates Jesse’s personality is a desire to be a biblical-style patriarch. When David was 12, his grandfather took him to the woods and begged God to show them a sign. David was so frightened by his grandfather’s demeanor that he ran off and fell, hitting his head. In “Godliness IV, Terror,” three years have passed. This time, it is the grandfather, Jesse Bentley, who falls. When Jesse tries to conduct a biblical-style sacrifice of a lamb, David becomes terrified; the situation has overtones of the intended sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham. David hurls a stone at Jesse from his slingshot. David runs away and is never seen in Winesburg again; his grandfather is permanently disabled, physically and mentally, from the incident.
In Winesburg, Ohio, parents fail to communicate with their offspring. In “Mother,” Elizabeth Willard has a bond with her son, George, in that she longs for the hopes that have died in her life with her unhappy marriage to live on in her son. In spite of the bond between her and George, however, she fails to communicate with him, even on her deathbed. In a story placed next to last in the sequence (“Death, Concerning Doctor Reefy”), the death described is that of Elizabeth herself. She is one of the female characters who have been disappointed in marriage and family life. During the last six days of her life, she is unable to speak or communicate with anyone, and she anguishes over her not being able to tell George about the money she has hidden away behind the plaster in the wall at the foot of her bed. This money was a legacy from Elizabeth’s father years earlier. Near death, he mulled over his own regrets and urged Elizabeth not to marry the young man she was seeing. However, Elizabeth did marry that young man, Tom Willard, with whom she had her son, George. Thus, failed communication, like the walled-up money, is a legacy from generation to generation. Natalie Tarenko
Individual and Society in Winesburg, Ohio
The central character in Winesburg, Ohio, is young George Willard. George’s work in the newspaper office in town brings him into contact with many other people who long to achieve communication. Like them, George talks more to himself than with anyone else about his own dreams, ideas, and impressions. What is true of one of them is true of all of them: “He could master others but he could not master himself.” Individual characters feel walled off and long to make contact with others; this longing to communicate leads them to attempt to find something in romantic relationships, an attempt that largely fails. George’s parents are one of these failed couples; both women and men express bitterness that their loneliness was not only not assuaged by society in the institution of marriage but had actually increased. George’s mother, Elizabeth, hopes that she can save her son from her own unhappy fate: “Within him
160â•…â•… Maya Angelou there is a secret something that is striving to grow. It is the thing I let be killed in myself.” On rare occasions, the individual can succeed in reaching out and having a dialogue with someone else. George’s mother succeeds in communicating not with her husband but with Dr. Reefy, and he with her, during conversations. However, not only is this release temporary, but even Elizabeth’s doctor friend “did not listen” to her. Another instance of achieved communication occurs between two male friends; the one who is married and having difficulty feeding his family tries to warn the other against married life. The married one momentarily feels a blaze of kinship with nature. So, too, George sees the residents of Winesburg “must be brothers and sisters to him”—but only temporarily. When he succeeds in taking a walk with Helen White, the girl for whom he has the most feeling, atoms are a metaphor for the separateness of the individual characters; they cling together for a short time, but then go their separate ways. In addition to being main protagonist, George Willard is also associated with the different aspects of local society: the newspaper that seeks to mention as many residents in each edition as possible; the New Willard House, his parent’s shabby hotel, in which many characters stay; Winesburg; and the judgments passed by Winesburg’s residents. Individuals possessed by an idea are grotesque, as are all the residents in Winesburg. The book begins with a procession of grotesques in a section titled “The Book of the Grotesque.” This section is the frame story that gives rise to the rest of the stories. Winesburg, Ohio, is a short-story cycle. Each chapter can stand alone and has the features of a short story such as epiphany and one main character; on the other hand, the chapters are related by means of links and repeated characters and situations. Thus, the genre of Winesburg, Ohio, is itself a model of individual (story) and society (whole work). Both the most prominent individual (George Willard) and the most prominent descriptor of society (grotesques) function as links to tie the book together. Natalie Tarenko
MAYA ANGELOUâ•… I Know Why the Caged Bird Singsâ•… (1970)
In Maya Angelou’s autobiographical story I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, we follow the protagonist, Marguerite (whom her brother calls Maya), from the age of three until the birth of her son. The story starts when Maya and her brother Bailey are sent away to live with their paternal grandmother, Momma, and their crippled uncle, Willie. The siblings spend their early years helping out in their grandmother’s store, which is the heart of the poor black southern town in which she lives. Eventually they are sent back to their mother, who, they discover, is a striking beauty. The story provides detailed descriptions of what it was like for a black girl to grow up in a deeply racist society. The story conveys Maya’s sense of displacement and illustrates how she experiences her supposed ugliness—in comparison to her mother and brother—to be visible proof of her outsider status. Maya’s father, Daddy Bailey, appears on the outskirts of the story, but the big influences on her life are, according to her, her two mothers; her beloved brother; Mrs. Flowers, a sophisticated black friend of her grandmother’s, who draws her out of her self-inflicted muteness through the recitation of poems; and Miss Kerwin, a teacher who is particularly impartial in matters of race. Although indignation over injustices and harsh descriptions of a bleak and painful reality are inevitable parts of Maya’s story, it is also a tale about the possibility of keeping one’s dignity in the face of insults and of overcoming injustices through perseverance. Eva Lupin
Abandonment in I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
Maya Angelou’s autobiographical novel opens with three-year-old Maya and her four-year-old bother Bailey traveling alone across the United States wearing wrist tags that read “To Whom It May Concern.” The siblings are being sent away from their newly divorced parents to live with their paternal grandmother, and Maya reacts by pretending her parents are dead. “I couldn’t believe that our mother would laugh and eat oranges in the sunshine without
I Know Why the Caged Bird Singsâ•…â•… 161 her children,” she explains. When, one year, the siblings suddenly receive Christmas presents from their parents, it is a painful reminder that they have chosen a life without their children, rather than a cause for joy; and in a manner typical of children, Maya feels guilty and wonders what she has done wrong. The initial act of abandonment committed by her parents affects Maya’s sense of belonging and results in her not feeling at home anywhere. While living with her grandmother, she does not mind being taken for her uncle Willie’s child, since she does not “feel any loyalty” to her father and suspects she would have been better treated as Willie’s daughter, anyway. And when it is decided that the siblings are to live with their mother, after residing for a time with their maternal grandparents, Maya’s reaction shows how constant relocations give rise to feelings of detachment: “Moving from the house where the family was centered meant absolutely nothing to me. It was simply a small pattern in the grand design of our lives.” Never knowing how long she is to stay in one particular house, Maya avoids creating strong bonds with anyone but her brother. Maya’s reflection that her mother “was competent in providing for us. Even if that meant getting someone else to furnish the provisions” reveals her desire for parental care; and this need makes her especially vulnerable to the advances of Mr. Freeman, the man living with her mother. After a first incident of physical closeness with him, she is reassured by his embrace and convinced that he is her “real father”; and subsequently, Freeman takes advantage of this closeness and rapes Maya. Discovering what has happened to her daughter, Maya’s mother has her boyfriend killed; the traumatic incident and her feelings of guilt cause Maya to withdraw into complete silence. She refuses to speak to anyone but Bailey, and when she feels them growing apart, she retreats into the world of books, reflecting that “the long-lost children mistaken for waifs, became more real to me than our house, our mother, our school or Mr. Freeman.” A sense of loneliness, then, prevails in Maya’s life, and she is constantly aware of the possibility of abandonment. On a trip to New Mexico with her father, upon losing sight of him, she finds herself in a “fog of panic,” which, she says, “nearly suffocated
me.” She becomes convinced that he has sold her to a man and left her; her anxiety is relieved only upon finding his car parked in the yard. Back at home, she has an argument with his girlfriend, which results in a wound on her arm, and her father therefore decides to leave her with friends. Waking up in an empty house, Maya does not want to wait around for anyone, and, afraid to show her mother her arm, she spends a month on the street with a group of other abandoned children, who, she says, “set a tone of tolerance for my life.” Maya’s experience of abandonment makes her sensitive to the other children’s emotional limitations, and she is therefore not surprised that her friends are “undemonstrative” and receive the news with noticeable “detachment” when she decides to leave them. Although the theme of abandonment pervades the novel, the story concludes on a note of hope. As the story nears its end, Maya has just delivered her firstborn and is persuaded by her mother to let the baby sleep in her bed. Overcome by tiredness, she falls asleep, only to be awakened by her mother, who shows Maya that her baby lies fast asleep, touching her side in the secure space of her folded arm. The blanket covers him like a roof that completes the symbolic home Maya creates for her baby with her own body. In this way, convinced that Maya will not repeat the abandonment she herself suffered, readers are left confident of her little boy’s prospects of growing up with his mother. Eva Lupin
Identity in I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
Maya Angelou’s autobiographical story depicts the childhood and adolescence of Marguerite, or Maya, a black girl growing up in a deeply racist society. The novel opens with words that well illustrate Maya’s existence and that also come to influence her state of mind: “What you looking at me for? I didn’t come to stay .╯.╯.” When she is three years old, Maya’s parents decide to get divorced, and as a result she and her four-year-old brother, Bailey, are sent on a bus crossing several states to their paternal grandmother in the South. The porter who has been paid to accompany them deserts the children after a day, and they are forced to take care of themselves. This is the first time they are separated from their
162â•…â•… Maya Angelou mother, but before the novel ends, the siblings have moved back and forth a couple of times. The instability of her existence makes Maya feel a lack of control, which is further emphasized by her being raped by her mother’s boyfriend when she is only eight years old. Feeling guilty for having allowed the man to come near her, Maya does not dare to admit in court that he has touched her once before, and when she realizes that her mother (after finding out what has happened) has had her boyfriend killed, Maya is convinced that his death is the punishment for her lie. Her feelings of guilt become so unbearable that she withdraws into silence, refusing to speak to anyone but her brother. As a child, Maya fails to comprehend why the siblings are being moved around, and the adult Marguerite expresses her confusion: “There was an army of adults, whose motives and movements I just couldn’t understand and who made no effort to understand mine.” The experience makes her feel powerless, and the feeling of lacking control is emphasized by her race. On her graduation day, for example, Marguerite alternates between hope for her future and deep despair for the whole of her race, as well as for the lack of opportunity they are all facing. The ceremony in school, however, ends on a note of hope with the congregation singing the black national anthem. But the words that speak most clearly to Marguerite are those of a white man, Patrick Henry: “Give me liberty or give me death.” Marguerite feels a strong sense of powerlessness and displacement at home, as well as in society for reasons of race, and Henry’s words become symbolic of the determination she forms as a result of her experiences. On a trip to Mexico with her father, Marguerite overcomes circumstances for the first time, and she revels in the feeling of accomplishment and control this gives her. Although she has never driven a car before, she finds herself in the middle of the night, her father lying drunk in the backseat, maneuvering his vehicle from a small village in Mexico to the American border. Driving on winding paths dangerously close to the mountain edge, she finds the experience “exhilarating” and recalls how “[i]t was me, Marguerite, against the elemental opposition .╯.╯. I was controlling Mexico, and might and alone-
ness, and inexperienced youth and Bailey Johnson, Sr., and death and insecurity, and even gravity.” The experience empowers her to take charge in all parts of her life, and a few years later, after extreme perseverance, she becomes the first female Negro conductor on the San Francisco streetcars. Marguerite develops through the novel from a person unsure of her place—both in her family and in the greater society—to a person who is able to set goals for herself and fulfill them against all odds. Her first job is the result of an unrelenting insistence on her right to work where she pleases; and, similarly, she sets the time and place for her first voluntary sexual experience, thereby reclaiming ownership of her own body, and to the right to make her own decisions. The novel ends with the birth of her son and her mother’s assurance that there is no need to worry about doing the right thing: “If you’re for the right thing, then you do it without thinking.” Eva Lupin
Race in I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings
The title of Maya Angelou’s autobiographical story is a line from a poem called “Sympathy” by the African-American poet Paul Laurence Dunbar. By choosing a line from a poet who is considered representative of the black community, Angelou implies that her personal story has social implications. Furthermore, the author’s dedication, which appears on the opening page of the book, to her son “and all the strong black birds of promise who defy the odds and gods and sing their songs,” emphasizes the collective sense of her experience. The novel confronts the issue of race gradually, similar to the way a child discovers the powers that control his or her being. When Maya is young, she moves mainly in the black community, and her interaction with white people is scarce: “In Stamps the segregation was so complete that most Black children didn’t really, absolutely know what whites looked like.” This does not mean, however, that white people’s power over the blacks’ existence went unnoticed. Maya painfully recalls how she and her brother were told to empty the vegetable bin one night, after the sheriff had warned them that the Klan was coming around. Once the bin was empty, Uncle Willie climbed in, and they covered him with
Beowulf â•…â•… 163 vegetables. All night they heard him mourn from his hiding place “as if he had, in fact, been guilty of some heinous crime.” Reflecting on the story, Maya concludes that she would have nothing to say in defense of the sheriff who, after having warned them, self-righteously believed “that things were as they should” and “that he was a gentle squire, saving those deserving serfs from the laws of the land, which he condoned.” Apart from the times that blacks and whites are forced to interact, there is a feeling in the novel that they live in parallel universes. The social organization that separates “powhitetrash” from respectable people is duplicated in Stamps, and Mrs. Flowers—who Maya says “made me proud to be a Negro, just by being herself ”—is described as “our side’s answer to the richest woman in town.” Maya reflects, however, that it is lucky she never encountered Mrs. Flowers near “powhitetrash,” because she would have heard her being addressed as “Bertha,” and Maya’s “image of her would have been shattered like the unmendable Humpty-Dumpty.” The clash between the black and the white societies culminates in the scene where Maya/Marguerite describes her graduation. She starts the day with a sense of great achievement, aware that she is graduating at the top of her class. But what begins as a gay celebration of an important event is symbolically interrupted by the appearance of a white man. The usual order of the ceremony, which is to begin with the American national anthem, followed by the pledge of allegiance and then what is known as the Negro national anthem, is interrupted by the white man, who gives a speech before the assembled congregation has had a chance to sing “their” song. The man is a high official who informs them that the central school—“(naturally, the white school was central)”—has been going through improvements, and that he intends their school to follow suit; he then leaves as if their graduation ceremony “had been a mere preliminary” and he now was “off to something really important.” The speech has reminded Marguerite and her friends of the limitations put on black people’s existence, and suddenly their festive mood is gone, and they are only aware of the lack of control that characterizes their lives.
Angelou’s tale exposes the great injustice with which blacks were treated. It also, however, induces in its reader the knowledge that even in the face of great injustice, individuals choose how to react. In one scene, for example, Maya witnesses Momma being abused by white girls, who call her by her first name and expose their genitals to her. Momma remains calm throughout the incident and politely addresses them as “Miz” when they leave. Maya bursts out crying, but when her grandmother patiently waits until she meets her eyes, Maya discovers that Momma is happy and comments: “Whatever the contest had been out front, I knew Momma had won.” Eva Lupin
ANONYMOUSâ•… Beowulf â•… (ca. 1000)
Beowulf is the longest and most complete surviving poem in Old English. The work probably circulated orally for centuries before being written down by scribes around the year 1000. It consists of 3,182 lines of alliterative verse. The poem’s plot, is straightforward and has the quality of a folktale, following recognizable patterns of myth: A young hero sets out on a sea journey to battle monsters. After dispatching two humanoid horrors in deadly combat, the victorious hero journeys back home to rule his own kingdom until he finally clashes with a dragon who kills him, though he wins glory and fame. But Beowulf also alludes to several battles and events in the past and future, at times digressing for several lines to narrate the action of a feud, battle, or heroic event; the poem’s allusive, interlacing quality makes it difficult and complex. But Beowulf is worth the struggle. For generations, teachers and students have enjoyed this tale of dragon slaying and troll combat set against the background of human feuding and warfare among the Danes, Frisians, Jutes, Swedes, and Geats. Legendary heroes like Beowulf and Wiglaf stand toe to toe with figures from history such as Hygelac, Hrothgar, and Ingeld. Though the poem cannot be considered historically accurate in a modern sense, Beowulf offers an uncannily familiar window into the alliances, truces, feuds, and political intrigues taking place in the Germanic heroic world. It continues to fascinate readers also because of its expression of
164â•…â•… Anonymous such prominent themes as community, religion, violence, and revenge. Tony Perrello
Community in Beowulf
The basic communal organization depicted in Beowulf and described by the first-century Roman historian Tacitus in his Germania (ca. 98) is the comitatus, or clan structure. Central to the function of the clan is the relationship between the lord and his retainers. Gift giving solemnizes the bond between lord and retainer, and in return for goods received, the retainer takes a solemn oath of fealty. Time and again, the poet refers to Hrothgar, Hygelac, and Beowulf—good kings—as “ring-giver,” “helmet of the Danes,” and “giver of treasure.” Hrothgar’s success is marked by the poet’s acknowledgment that he “doled out rings / and torques at the table” (ll. 80–81). This social contract solemnizes allegiance in the heroic world. The so-called Finn digression (ll. 1069–1158) shows the tragic and shameful consequences of a group of retainers who choose to follow their lord’s slayer rather than die trying to avenge him. Revenge is the most powerful bond that held Anglo-Saxon communities together. The members of a comitatus had a moral obligation to avenge the slaughter of kin. Compensation took the form of a wergild, or “man-price.” Each member of the comitatus had a precalculated worth. If someone was slain, the offending party had to pay the wergild, or life would be taken in return for life, even if the slaying was accidental. Though the onus for exacting revenge fell upon the victim’s family, it had the support of the lord and the force of law behind it (hence the modern legal term posse comitatus). Failure to gain retribution was the source of terrible grief and shame. Indeed, the most distressing aspect of Grendel’s depredations is, as the poet tells us, that “he would never / parley or make peace with any Dane / nor stop his death dealing nor pay the death-price. / No counselor could ever expect / fair reparation from those rabid hands” (ll. 154–158). On the Geatish side, King Hrethel’s son, Herebeald, is accidentally slain by his brother, Haethoyn, who fires an arrow at him. Hrethel pines away in despair because no reparation can be taken, and the king’s
death results in the first Swedish/Geatish war (ll. 2,435ff., 2,472ff.). Beowulf begins with the genealogy of the Danish royal house and highlights the ways successful communities were formed. Lines 67–83 recount Hrothgar’s rise to power and the building of Heorot, the mead hall of the Danes. Heorot is a large, centrally located hall in which the Danes gather to eat, drink beer or mead, hear the songs of the scop (a combination poet, musician, and historian), boast of their exploits, and receive gifts at the hands of their lord. In building a mead hall, a lord walls in his people and offers a sense of warmth and communal belonging. He also walls out the dark, chaotic, and uncontrollable forces of nature. The lavish descriptions of treasure and gifts that occur time and again in the poem—right down to Beowulf ’s dying wish to behold the dragon’s treasure hoard—always bring readers back to this early moment when Hrothgar builds a hall and blocks out nature and his enemies. The immediate threat to this sustainable community is Grendel. The monsters of Beowulf represent more than simply a threat to the safety of the Beowulfian community. These creatures and the horror they inspire represent the deep-seated anxieties of a warrior culture. Grendel represents, on one level, the monstrous principle of kin killing: He is the product of Cain’s murder of Abel. Fratricide runs counter to everything the comitatus stands for. Gerendel is a “lonewalker” who stands apart from the community. He does not use weapons, pay reparations, speak, boast, or enjoy hall noise. Grendel is the dark-side manifestation of everything a heroic warrior and model community member—like Beowulf—ought to be. Grendel’s mother represents a more vexing problem. Women in this community have certain limited functions: They are “peace-weavers” and “cup-bearers,” like Wealhtheow and Hygd, or mourners beside the funeral pyre, like the wailing woman at Beowulf ’s tomb. Grendel’s mother threatens the gender-specific revenge code of Anglo-Saxon society by leaving her home beneath the water to invade Heorot and avenge the death of her son. She may be a “natural” mother, but she represents the opposite of what that culture seems to have valued in women.
Beowulf â•…â•… 165 Grendel’s mother proves a tougher challenge for Beowulf than does her son, but the dragon costs him his life. The dragon is the opposite of the good king the poet takes such pains to construct for his audience. Instead of freely giving treasure, it hoards it. It is miserly and greedy, sitting alone atop its hoard in a cold and dark anti-hall. These monsters are both exterior threats to the community and projections of repressed evils within that community. Tony Perrello
Religion in Beowulf
Religion is a source of mystery in the poem Beowulf and a divisive issue among its readers. Christianity plays an ambiguous role in this poem about pagan heroes and monsters, but it is ultimately responsible for the poem’s preservation. As Roy Liuzza has noted in the preface to his 2000 translation, many scholars see the hero, Beowulf, as a Christ figure, one who gives his life for his people in a struggle with a serpent hostile to mankind. Others have argued that the poem—with its ultimate vision of doom and futility in the face of human greed and ongoing violence—is a condemnation of a pagan world that thrived on domination and conquest. Beowulf certainly offers a portrait of a world before Christ. In lines 175–188, the poet condemns the heathenish Danes, who turn to idol worship when plagued with Grendel. The burial rites depicted in the poem, usually involving a burning pyre, are markedly pagan. Christ is never mentioned. Fate is stern and implacable, and worldly glory seems to be the only lasting virtue, leaving the final words of the poem ambiguous—was Beowulf a humble Christ figure or one eager for earthly fame? There is only one historically datable event in the poem: the death of Hygelac, lord of the Geats, sometime between 521 and 526 (the Frankish historian Gregory of Tours recorded the death of “Chlochilaichus”—the Latin form of “Hygelac”—in 521). Although the Roman emperor Constantine had converted to Christianity in the fourth century, it was not until the year 597 that Saint Augustine of Canterbury undertook his mission of conversion in the southern reaches of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. The Northern Anglo-Saxons had previously received the word of God from Irish missionaries,
and within less than a century after Saint Augustine set out, the entire island had been converted. The scribes who wrote down Beowulf sometime around the year 1000 were Christian. At the time of the poem’s composition, “writing” was done exclusively by monks working in monasteries. Since parchment (sheepskin) was expensive, only works deemed valuable were copied and preserved. The manuscript that contains Beowulf also contains a saint’s life (The Passion of Saint Christopher) and a versified story from the Bible (The book of Judith). Although references to the Bible are exclusively from the Old Testament, the “poet” (or is it the scribe?) expects his audience to be familiar with biblical stories, such as that of Cain in Genesis, whose fratricide gave rise to Grendel and thus makes Unferth sinister through association. When Hrothgar examines the sword hilt taken from the lair of Grendel’s mother, the poet alludes to the apocryphal Old Testament story of God’s destruction of the race of giants by flood (ll. 1,688ff.). For centuries Beowulf was sung, by memory, to the accompaniment of a harp. This oral formulaic poem of the sixth through 10th centuries, then, received its Christian coloration when recorded by monastic scribes around the year 1000. Sometime in the late seventh century, a monk known as the Venerable Bede recorded what is perhaps the first English poem—“Caedmon’s Hymn.” Caedmon, an illiterate cowherd who worked in a monastery in Whitby (northeast England), was, legend has it, visited by an angel in a dream and given the power of song, spontaneously singing a song of creation— “Caedmon’s Hymn.” Caedmon refers to God by such epithets as “Master Almighty,” “Mankind’s Guardian,” “Eternal Lord,” and “Measurer”—hardly the meek lamb of the New Testament. For the first time in history, heroic language and the meter of heroic battle poetry were applied to a religious text, a literary moment known as the Caedmonian Revolution. The Beowulf poet applies this strategy time and again, referring obliquely to God with heroic terms such as “Wielder of All” or “Father Almighty.” And for some readers of the poem, Beowulf is a type of Christ, and his actions sometimes parallel biblical or apocryphal events. For instance, Beowulf “harrows hell” to confront Grendel’s mother in a lair
166â•…â•… Anonymous described with language recalling hell in Old English homilies. More obvious is Beowulf ’s journey to seek out the dragon, an adversary of mankind who lives underground, smells of brimstone and fire, and exemplifies greed and hatred. Wyrm, the Old English word for dragon, also meant “snake,” so it is clear whom this king of men is fighting. Beowulf took 11 comrades on his journey, plus “the one who had started all this strife” (a thief who had awoken the dragon by stealing a cup from its hoard), which parallels Christ’s 12 apostles. Beowulf suffers before the battle, “sensing his death” (l. 2,420), and indeed, his men abandon him in his hour of need. He dies, sacrificially, for his people. The language of Beowulf is often the language of a distant past, “in days gone by” (l. 1). Perhaps the poem’s religious language and impressionism is meant to link its legends, and its great hero, to the Christian “present,” the world of the scribes who recorded it. Tony Perrello
Violence in Beowulf
The modern reader of Beowulf may be excused for mistranslating line 18b of the poem—blæd wide sprang—as “blood spread wide.” The correct translation is “glory spread wide,” but in this poem, both blood and glory spring from bodies. And Beowulf is a poem about bodies—crushed, cut, torn, dismembered, beheaded, burned, gulped down in gobbets, and tossed about on frosty seas, prey to voracious sea monsters. The main action of the poem circles around mortal and bloody combat between the hero, Beowulf, and three formidable monsters, and also around ongoing bloody conflict between nations. The poet interlaces these narratives with songs of past battles, monster fights, and reprisals of the primal murder. Beowulf warns that no act of violence occurs in a vacuum, but it is the consequence of some violent act and will cause future bloodshed. Peace is transitory and can only be established by those most adept at causing violence and spreading terror—like Beowulf, and Hrothgar before him. A nation’s survival in Beowulf requires a leader who can strike terror in his neighbors and subjugate outlying tribes. The poem begins with the genealogy of the Danish royal house, and we quickly learn that Hrothgar, like Scyld before him, enjoyed “the
fortunes of war,” finally assembling a “mighty army” (ll. 65–67). Only then could he construct a mead hall where he could dole out treasure and enjoy a respite from the ravages of warfare and slaughter. As a successful, violent warrior like his ancestors before him (Scyld was a “scourge of many tribes” and “a wrecker of mead benches”), Hrothgar has inspired fear in those around him and so is able to enjoy temporary peace. Hrothgar’s very name points to the lust and glory promised by battle (hroth = joy, benefit, glory; gar = spear). The benefit of war, in this case, is the building of Heorot, the mead hall of the Danes. Heorot means “hart,” or stag, probably a reference to the horns that adorned the doorway of the building. However, there is a haunting reference to the name after the attack by Grendel’s mother: the water burns. The mere bottom has never been sounded by the sons of men. On its bank, the heather-stepper halts: the hart in flight from pursuing hounds will turn to face them with firm-set horns and die in the wood rather than dive beneath its surface. That is no good place. (ll. 1,366–1,372) This passage offers one of the many descriptions of a hostile, brutal nature—a nature “red in tooth and claw”—precisely the kind of world walled-out by the construction of Heorot. But we also see the hart—symbol of the Danish nation—beleaguered by ravenous forces and driven to self-destruction. We are told that Heorot is doomed to suffer a “barbarous burning” in the Heathobard feud, despite the marriage of Freawaru and Ingeld. Such is the fate of a kingdom ruled by a king who does not use violence and terrorism as tools. One way to turn violence to political advantage in Beowulfian society is to use women as pawns to broker peace, but such an approach is invariably doomed to failure, as Beowulf indicates after his return to Geatland: “But generally the spear / Is prompt to retaliate when a prince is killed / No matter how admirable the bride may be” (ll. 2,029–2,031). Wergild—literally “man-price”—was another way the Anglo-Saxons capitalized on violence,
The Frogsâ•…â•… 167 substituting gold in its stead. The threat of revenge afforded some safety in Anglo-Saxon culture, a world where each member of a tribe had a precalibrated worth. If a clan member was killed, his particular man-price must be paid, or a blood feud would go into effect. The 12 winters of Grendel’s anarchic violence, of hall floors “slick with slaughter,” is terrible precisely because the monster does not pay reparations for those he kills. He is violence itself, all claw and mouth, and destroys the order represented by Heorot, grinding and consuming and reducing the human element to gore: “he grabbed a man and mauled him on his bench, / bit into his bone-lappings, bolted down his blood / and gorged on him in lumps, leaving the body / utterly lifeless, eaten up / hand and foot” (ll. 740–744). Grendel’s violence erases distinctions and individuality and threatens a system that sprung from violence in the first place. And Beowulf is strikingly like Grendel: He, too, has the strength of 30 in his handgrip; he fights Grendel (and Dayraven) without weapons, and in the death match with Grendel, he breaks bone lappings and dismembers his opponent. He is heroic because he out-monsters Grendel—outdoes him in doing violence. Like Grendel, the dragon is a force of seemingly unstoppable chaos that reduces great halls and human achievement to indistinguishable rubble and ash. However perverse this night-flying “wyrm” may be, though, it is not unlike the hero of the poem. It guards its treasure in a hall, peacefully, until a cup is stolen, at which time it ventures out for revenge, destroying outlying villages and deterring through terrorism. After Beowulf kills the dragon—this time with the help of Wiglaf—the dying hero predicts a new bout of violent incursions from the Swedes. Beowulf ’s ability to make violence is no longer at hand to help his nation. Like Hrothgar 50 years earlier, Beowulf ’s strength is no longer a match for the brutality of the Anglo-Saxon world. The audience of Beowulf is treated to particularly graphic battle scenes, such as Beowulf ’s description of the death of Ongentheow at the hands of Wulf and Eofor during the battle of Ravenswood (ll. 2,946–2,984). In fact, the human-on-human violence in the poem is as devastating as that wrought by monsters: We are told of Heremod’s and
Unferth’s Cain-like kin killing; the perverse Finn episode, where retainers are forced to join with their lord’s slayer, only to have violence reawakened by the laying of a famous sword in Hengest’s lap; the future strife to be visited upon Hrothgar’s children by his nephew, Hrothulf, and so on, on and on. The violent attack that inevitably comes from the Swedes makes for a somber ending to the poem. Humans are the worst monsters, war and hardship are a way of life, revenge holds groups together, and the only good king is a strong one willing to decimate his neighbors. The specter of wyrd, the Old English word for fate, overshadows Beowulf. Anglo-Saxon wyrd is stern and implacable: Life is transitory, and only the glory that springs from violence and battle can outlast the human bone-house. Tony Perrello
ARISTOPHANESâ•… The Frogsâ•… (405 b.c.)
The Frogs is a comedy by the ancient Greek dramatist Aristophanes (ca. 450–ca. 388 b.c.), typically treated by modern translators as a play in two acts. In act 1, Dionysus—in whose honor drama festivals were held—journeys to the underworld to find the great poet Euripides, whose political wisdom he believes can save Athens, thereby ensuring the city’s drama festivals will continue. This was a pertinent search to represent at the time, with Athens suffering internal strife and extreme pressure from the adversarial Spartans. Act 2 is dominated by a contest between Aeschylus and Euripides for the honor of best poet, eventually decided on the merit of their political advice. The contemporary political backdrop to The Frogs is of central importance to its meaning. The play’s purpose presents striking alignment with its content, for Aristophanes used it to deliver his own political message. This message is the very same political strategy that Dionysus elicits from Hades’ wisest tragedian, whom the contest ultimately reveals to be Aeschylus: Recall from voluntary exile the figure Alcibiades. In Aristophanes’ view, to issue this kind of instruction to the audience is one of two critical
168â•…â•… Aristophanes functions served by poets; the other is to provide entertainment: “We chorus folk two privileges prize: / To amuse you, citizens, and to advise” (l. 2). Humor is integral to The Frogs’s entertainment value, which arises from antagonistic relationships between the rivals Aeschylus and Euripides and between Dionysus and his slave, Xanthias; from repeated switching of identities; and through the evocation of ancient Greece’s rich poetic tradition. These three thematic concerns—ambition, identity, and tradition, respectively—also condition the text for the fulfillment of its instructive function. With its humor and pointed political message, The Frogs is a lively and sharp work, the cleverness and sophistication of which is elevated by selfreflexive framing structures and devices. Kate Concannon
Ambition in The Frogs
The force that drives the action within The Frogs is ambition—namely, personal ambition. This force directs the plot’s course and functions as a dramatic catalyst, spurring contest and conflict as ambitions clash. There are two main conflicts of ambition within The Frogs: that between Dionysus and Xanthias and that between Aeschylus and Euripides. Both conflicts produce humor to satisfy the play’s entertainment function. But more important, the conflict between Aeschylus and Euripides produces the play’s final take-home message, achieved through reasoned argument revealed by dialogue, to satisfy its higher function of imparting wisdom—in this case political. Additionally, the play displays self-reflexive qualities, through which it appears conscious of itself as a literary text and creates frames of texts within texts. This heightens awareness of the existence of a further frame beyond the play itself and within which it was written—a frame shaped by Aristophanes’ own personal ambition. Xanthias and Dionysus’s relationship is characterized by the struggle for power that ensues as each pursues his personal ambition. To attain selfdetermination and autonomy, Xanthias must resist the instances of subordination by which Dionysus attempts to exert dominance over him. To secure the optimal position for himself throughout the shifting
circumstances of the play, Dionysus frequently relies on Xanthias to swap identities temporarily, often to Xanthias’s own disadvantage. Dionysus invokes his socially endorsed advantage as master in this master-slave relationship to procure Xanthias’s obedience; however, Xanthias’s own ambition means he is not always compliant, altruistic, and unquestioning. In fact, Dionysus’s formal authority as master—as well as god—is frequently undermined by Xanthias’s insubordination and by his opportunistic attempts to subvert this authority when the situation permits. This quick-witted opportunism is in precisely the same vein as his master’s self-interested maneuvering around situations and is neatly described by the chorus: If you want to be comfy just roll with the ship! Don’t stand like a fool with a stiff upper lip, But learn from Theramenes, that shrewd politician, To move with the times and improve your position. (1.2.522–588) Their struggle produces comical effects, such as where Xanthias, dressed as Heracles while Dionysus is dressed as his slave, invites Aeacus to torture Dionysus. The comedy escalates as Dionysus in turn manipulates the situation such that Xanthias is forced to defend the credibility of his assumed identity by enduring this torture, too; if he is the god he claims to be, Xanthias should feel nothing. The result is literal slapstick as they are repeatedly caned and struggle to conceal their pain. The turns each takes in dealing (nonphysical) blows to the other as they pursue their individual ambitions gives the struggle the quality of a game, enhancing the playfulness of their scenes and rendering amusing both the oppression of the master-slave inequality and the brutality of physical violence. For Aeschylus and Euripides, their shared ambition to hold the title of best poet naturally results in conflict, which is resolved through a witty, umpired contest. Dialogue provides the dramatic structure for exploring conflict through debate. This debate reveals the contesting arguments—literary and eventually political—and presents them for evalu-
The Frogsâ•…â•… 169 ation by Dionysus, whose concluding judgment is the vehicle for the author’s take-home political message. Dionysus’s decision to bring Aeschylus back from Hades is disinterested as far as the ambitions of Aeschylus and Euripides to return to the living realm are concerned, for his actions are determined solely in accordance with the furthering of his own ambitions: to return to life a great tragedian who, through sage political advice, can save the city and so enable the continuance of drama festivals in Dionysus’s honor: Euripides: What do you want a poet for? Dionysus: To save the City of course. If the city isn’t saved, there won’t be any more drama festivals, and then where shall I be? (l. 2.1) The implicit political role of the poet here is important and ties in with the play’s self-reflexivity, which is constituted in significant part by literary criticism—here the form’s content comments on what makes for good content within the very literary form—and by the framing of plays within the play. Extracts from canonical plays are quoted, and The Frogs even opens with characters devising a play opening. These devices create frames for the action and point the reader to consider the frame in which the play itself was written and how, by means of this work, Aristophanes pursues his own personal ambitions as a poet: to deliver a political message that promotes the poet’s position by protecting opportunities such as drama festivals and, more immediately, to win the drama competition for which The Frogs was his entry. Kate Concannon
Identity in The Frogs
Mistaken and switched identity is a major convention of ancient Greek theater, and its preponderance has continued throughout much of subsequent Western theater tradition. Often it functions as a fulcrum for dramatic confusion and conflict that propels plot; it also functions as a comedic device. Whereas act 2’s humor relies on the wit and satire that characterizes the dialogic argument between Aeschylus and Euripides, in act 1 the repeated switching of identity is the primary device by which
humor is achieved. Identity swapping is also used to reveal the characters’ “real” nature underlying the borrowed identities. Furthermore, plays on identity are exploited to produce self-reflexive effects. The visual humor of costuming, by which identity is marked, is rendered accessible to readers even without the benefit of a staged performance: Heracles laughs to behold Dionysus’s “yellow nightdress,” and his “feminine boots” also rate mention. Similarly, the physical humor played out in the frequent and hurried exchanges of costume between Xanthias and Dionysus is readily imaginable and does not rely on actual performance to be grasped. Structurally, these costumed identity exchanges are also significant, marking Xanthias’s and Dionysus’s challenges as they strive toward entry into Pluto’s palace, where Euripides is to be found. In this sense, identity swaps function to punctuate their negotiation of the journey through its constitutive encounters. The confusion and false belief arising from the identity games led by Dionysus in act 1 sweep the plot along, shifting the balance of advantage each identity presents from encounter to encounter. This creates the flow by which situations arise and develop. By way of example, the first exchange with Aeacus leads Dionysus to initiate an identity swap to evade pain, which is followed by an exchange with Persephone’s maid that prompts another swap to procure pleasure, which in turn leads to an encounter with two landladies that motivates a swap back to evade pain again. Dionysus is self-serving. The whole undertaking detailed in The Frogs is motivated by his personal ambition to protect the drama festivals held in his honor and so too are his moves to swap between the identities of Heracles, Xanthias, and Dionysus motivated by self-interest. The pattern of character these switches describe furnishes an incisive picture of Dionysus’s personality. At the prospect of Aeacus’s revenge on him for Heracles’ harm to Cerberus, Dionysus is shown to be cowardly, suffering a moment of incontinence before passing over the godly costume (and attendant threat of imminent violence) to Xanthias. Shortly thereafter, Dionysus’s quick enthusiasm for the opportunity to be hosted as Heracles in the amorous company of Persephone’s maids and dancing girls exposes
170â•…â•… Aristophanes the god’s sensuousness, while Xanthias’s slowness in picking up the maid’s meaning exposes his relative naïveté. Dionysus’s shameless self-interest as he swings with alacrity between costumed identities to ensure his own advantage at every point is in itself a comedic source, producing an extremity of conduct crafted for laughs. The assuming and discarding of identity throughout the play is also used as a self-reflecting device, contributing to the overall effect by which the play indicates it is conscious of itself as a text and a performance. Xanthias: There, how do I look? Reckon the part suits me better than it does you, you old coward! Dionysus: Hm! A very good imitation of a slave dressed up as Heracles. (l. 2.11460–11521) In this exchange, Dionysus draws attention to the very nature of performance and, implicitly, how this applies to the performance of The Frogs itself. Just as suspended disbelief supports the credibility of Xanthias as Heracles, so too does it support that of the play’s own actors as they don the identities of The Frogs’ characters. By this self-reflexivity, the play draws attention to what exists outside and beyond it and how this might relate to the play and its meanings. It also provides clues as to Aristophanes’ use of structure to guide the audience’s interpretation of those meanings. Specific instances of self-reflection such as Dionysus’s comment above do not just prompt the audience to see how those specific examples connect the play’s fictionally contained realm with the broader “reality” to which it points. They also promote an attitude of outward reading so that the play’s overall messages will be taken as intended for the real world. Dionysus’s belief that a poet can save the city mirrors Aristophanes. Moreover, the play’s internal reality legitimizes by its assumptions both the political aptitude of the poet and the consequent importance of heeding his political message, while also providing that message to be received and heeded by the audience in its own real world. Kate Concannon
Tradition in The Frogs
The Frogs engages with tradition at several key levels. Mythological and religious traditions underpin the play’s characters and immediate setting, as well as its wider cultural frame of reference. On another level, the ancient Greek poetic and dramatic tradition is evoked through reference to earlier poets’ works. Additionally, broader traditions of ancient Greek theater are reproduced and developed by Aristophanes’ own use of conventional types, tropes, and structure. Two primary purposes can be adduced from this emphasis on tradition: an orchestrated appeal to cultural patriotism to condition the audience for Aristophanes’ political message and an expounding of his own related poetic position. The journey to Hades (called katabasis) is a traditional act of heroism and as such is a beaten track in the mythology of ancient Greece. The play itself acknowledges this tradition, assuming the audience’s familiarity with previous katabatic journeys in its reference to Heracles’ recent visit to Hades and in its mention of the underworld presence of Persephone, whose adventures to Hades form their own significant mythology. The play’s settings, from the River Styx to Pluto’s palace, are thus locations rich with cultural significance readily identifiable to an ancient Athenian audience. Likewise, the rites played out by the chorus of devotees, who are initiates in religious mysteries, contribute to the dense tissue of cultural tradition around which The Frogs is cast. In act 2, Athenian poetic tradition is drawn forth with recitation from Aeschylus’s and Euripides’ plays as their poetry is laid out for critique. The presence of Aeschylus’s and Euripides’ work within The Frogs goes rather deeper than these dialogic references and extracts, however. Signature features incorporated within The Frogs create a double reflection of their particular contributions to stylistic and structural traditions of theater. Thus, these poets’ works, by influence, furnish the dramatic structure Aristophanes then uses to explore their poetic merits. In his time, Aeschylus expanded the number of characters in a play to facilitate conflict between them where, previously, characters interacted only with the chorus. The Frogs bears this legacy in the smaller role of the chorus and in the conflicts between
Lysistrataâ•…â•… 171 Xanthias and Dionysus and between Aeschylus and Euripides, which are empowered by direct dialogue. Euripides, on the other hand, is credited with introducing the convention of the intelligent slave, among other innovations, an influence that is also seen in The Frogs with the character Xanthias. Aristophanes exploits many conventions that constitute the ancient Greek theater tradition. Clues in the script point to the exploitation of costuming for comic effect, in accordance with the comedic tradition of exaggeration that involved such items as ultra-short robes designed to reveal phallic prostheses. Also featured is the traditional chorus, who in turn deliver the structural convention of the parabasis (address to the audience), which immediately follows Dionysus’s admission into Pluto’s palace. Aristophanes’ characterization of Dionysus as a lewd, pleasure-seeking god, whose predilections readily provide opportunities for the comedic trope of crude sexual innuendo, is also highly conventional. While such reproduction of traditional elements consolidates the conventions they form, Aristophanes also produces an innovation in The Frogs by combining two forms of comic motif, the journey and the contest (agon) structure, and giving them comparable weighting, with one act being reserved for each. Despite this deviation, however, the agon observes the structure’s own rules of tradition, whereby it is the second speaker in any contest who emerges victorious; likewise, the journey motif is sufficiently sympathetic to tradition to be clearly recognizable as such, even if the comic approach to it produces a twist on the more typically serious convention of the katabatic myth or myths in which characters travel to the underworld. Aristophanes was a stern advocate of tradition—poetic and political—for the superior moral rectitude and wisdom he considered it offered, though its old-fashioned ways may lack the slick appearance, novelty, or shock value of cleverness and glib expression, which Aristophanes equates with Euripides. The Frogs, with its unequivocal judgment on the respective merits of the two tragedians, presents a vehicle for expounding his aesthetic position, which is dramatized by Dionysus’s selection of Aeschylus and his poetic legacy over and above the flashier Euripides. Aristophanes also leverages the
power of cultural tradition in its poetic and dramatic forms to achieve his political purpose. By drawing on the audience’s knowledge of Athenian mythological and poetic traditions while further expanding them—that is, by referencing other plays and myths by means of a vehicle that, as a poetic artifact in itself, enriches the tradition it celebrates—The Frogs functions as an appeal to the Athenians’ rich cultural tradition, as accessed and expressed through theater. Moreover, The Frogs can be interpreted as a rallying instrument by which to motivate the Athenians to take the political action Aristophanes envisages will ensure the city’s viability, cultural and otherwise, beyond its present point of threat. Kate Concannon
ARISTOPHANESâ•… Lysistrataâ•… (411 b.c.)
The masterpieces of comedy produced by Aristophanes, the sharp and lewd wit of fifth-century Athens, may forever play supporting roles to their tragic counterparts. However, Lysistrata, a fantasy in which Greek women stage a sit-in/sex strike to end the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta, maintains a special place in dramatic and literary history. Featuring a title character whose name loosely translates as “she who disbands armies,” its current popular recognition can be mostly credited to perennial productions that use its theme of “love not war” (or more precisely “no love until no war”) to stage public challenges to military conflict. The most significant recent example was the Lysistrata Project, which presented thousands of readings of the play as an action against the pending U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. While Lysistrata is not specifically an antiwar play (Lysistrata is no pacifist, as she cheers efforts to destroy the Hellenes, depicted in the play as barbarians), it is a play that depicts the possibility of peace, forged unexpectedly by the power of women’s chastity. Lysistrata is essentially an act of hope driven by a fundamental gender power reversal, which is fueled by the often underestimated forces of sex and sexuality, sensuality, and eroticism. It is for this reason that many audiences, critics, and scholars have reflected, to paraphrase, that it is a play that will be pertinent as long as men and
172â•…â•… Aristophanes women make love and as long as human beings try to kill one another, and thus, sex and war remain fundamental to human existence. Ben Fisler
Gender in Lysistrata
If sex is the fuel Lysistrata and her confederates use to transform the world, gender is the world that they set ablaze, by turning the Athenian status quo on its head. Aristophanes sets the scene by referencing Athenian gender standards, combining the Greek perception that women are driven by their appetites, particularly sexual desire, with the ancient reality of extreme patriarchy. In the text, Athenian women have no virtually no political power, and they acknowledge that; Athenian men perceive women as being controlled by their passions, and the women recognize that. Thus, the play creates a fantasy where women have the support of both Aphrodite (to drive the men into a sexual frenzy first) and Athena (the virgin goddess who contains the women’s needs as they stage their sex strike/sit-in at her sacred Acropolis). Within what the primarily male Greek audience would have seen as a fantasy, women achieve considerable power and restraint, allowing them to act with surprising agency. Calonice both bespeaks and personifies the idea that women are driven by their sexuality, when Lysistrata begins to suggest the plan. First, she doubts that women can help the war effort, given their inability to do anything “but sit at home looking pretty, wearing saffron gowns” (l. 47). Then, she becomes entirely distracted by her own fantasies of saffron gowns and slippers (ll. 51–53). Later, the entire gathering of women hears Lysistrata’s plan and proceeds to exit the stage. Myrrhine proclaims that she would be cut in half or “walk through fire, or anything else .╯.╯. but renounce sex, never” (ll. 133–135). It takes much convincing for the women to accept the strategy, given that “there’s nothing like [sex]” (l. 136). It is the shield oath that gives women the power to renounce their passions, drawing on the power of the virgin goddess, Athena, to control their normally uncontrollable sex drives. Lysistrata has a direct confrontation with the representative of Athenian law, the Magistrate, in which she recognizes the status quo.
Lysistrata: Always till now we have .╯.╯. uncomplainingly endured whatever you men did .╯.╯. And what did [our husbands] always say? “Shut up and mind your own business!” And I did. Magistrate: You’d have been for it if you hadn’t. Lysistrata: Exactly—so I kept quiet. (ll. 508–518) In the same argument, however, Lysistrata justifies the women’s power to affect the present revolt. Magistrate: You in charge of state money? Lysistrata: We’ve always been in charge of all your household finances. (ll. 494–496) Thus, even as Aristophanes allows his characters to articulate the imbalance between male and female power in Athens, he identifies the possibility that women might be trained to affect action. Though they are the most obvious examples, it is not the sex strike nor the occupation of the Acropolis that constitute the most aggressive reversal of patriarchy in Lysistrata. The conflict between the old women and old men of Athens, which occurs between lines 254 and 463, is a far more direct disruption of the status quo. The men approach with torches to burn out the feud and are met by women who use water to quench their flames. This incident is enhanced by references to the soaking as a “wedding bath” and to the discomforts of age: “[O]ur clothes are wringing wet as if we were incontinent” (ll. 403–404). These comments affirm the metaphor of the conflict; the sexual center of womanhood (characterized by liquidity) defeating the sexual center of manhood (characterized by a phallic-shaped flame). The metaphorical defeat gives way to an even more direct reversal of the power structure, as the women achieve victory in an unrestrained brawl. While the entire play is an example of the world turned upside down, this centerpiece scene crosses into the realm of civil unrest. The play reverses the ancient status quo to such an extent that it is often interpreted as protofeminist. There is no question that Aristophanes was progressive in his views of women, at least in so far
Lysistrataâ•…â•… 173 as a fifth-century Athenian male citizen could have been. It is probable that some of his literary and public attacks on Euripides stemmed from the tragedian’s popularly observed misogyny. However, the play is a comic fantasy, one that ends with a return to the status quo that the strike temporarily turns on its head. Lysistrata herself gives her comrades in arms back to their husbands. Clearly, Aristophanes is far less interested in female empowerment for women’s sake than for the political goal of bringing the long war to an end. This is his hope. Ben Fisler
Hope in Lysistrata
In sum, the play is an act of hope. Aristophanes suggests a peaceful solution to the Athenian/Spartan conflict in which Greek citizens choose love over war, and he proposes that women might be the source of this transformative power. He also suggests that all Greek nations share a certain basic humanity, even as he exploits national differences (actually presented as stereotypes) for comedic effect. The textual mix of Greek religious and historical references and the march of diverse regional types compel the spectators to remember that “we are all Greeks” within the context of comedy. Lysistrata proclaims the possibility that women might be the last best hope for peace during her debate with the Magistrate. Many a time we’d hear at home about some major political blunder of yours .╯.╯. [Do you think] we should not be allowed to make the least little suggestion to you, no matter how you mismanage your affairs? But now every time two men meet in the street, what do they say? Isn’t there a man in the country? And the answer comes, “Not one.” That’s why we women got together and decided to unite and save Greece .╯.╯. You listen to us—and it’ll be good advice we give—listen to us and keep quiet, like you made us do, and we’ll set you to rights. (ll. 511–528, original emphasis) This speech does not suggest that patriarchy will be demolished in favor of a government of women, nor one of gender equality. It suggests that out of
desperation for some wisdom and responsibility, any alternative to the madness of the current state of affairs is worth trying. To both sweeten the appeal of peace and maintain humor, Aristophanes uses references to regional differences among the Greeks. The Spartans speak with a rustic dialect, suggesting their roughneck contrast with Athenian sophistication, and Lampito herself salivates over the prospect of heavy drinking as they prepare wine for the oath (l. 197). The Athenian women comment on the odor of the citizens of Anagyrus and the body weight of Corinthian noblewomen. This provides humorous recognition of perceived cultural difference but reaffirms the variety of Greek peoples, in opposition to far more greatly feared Persians or hated barbarians. The subtle reminder of pan-Greek civilization provides a foundation for its shared history, affirmed during the official reconciliation at the finale. In a Spartan’s song and dance celebrating the peace, Aristophanes simultaneously recognizes panGreek history and maintains an ironic tone appropriate to comedy. The Spartan praises Athenian sea victories and the military prowess of Sparta, then references both the sacrifices of Leonidas and the Spartan force at Thermopylae and the sea battle at Artemisium. He sings of the bravery and resolve of both nations against the Persian threat, reminding the audience of the days of Greek unity. Ironically, Thermopylae ended with every Spartan soldier dead, and Artemisium failed to halt the Persian war machine. A tragic poet might have chosen more decisive victories, but Aristophanes maintains the satirical techniques of comedy, even as he celebrates a victory won by the hand of female soldiers wielding the powerful scepter of sex. Ben Fisler
Sex and Sexuality in Lysistrata
Lysistrata is a play about sex that, when translated honestly, is transparently pornographic. Efforts by post-1960s translators, such as Jeffrey Henderson and Alan H. Sommerstein, have embraced the blatant vulgarity and bawdiness central to the play specifically and, in many ways, to Greek comedy in general. However, references to male and female genitalia, the mechanics of sexual activity, and the
174â•…â•… Aristophanes lusty desires of men and women, both young and old, should not be taken as low-brow humor incorporated for mere shock value. The play’s bold sexual references give it much of its power. Sexuality is the source of much humor, but it is also the primary mechanism for hope. Lysistrata proposes that the lust for copulation is the only human desire that outmatches the lust for blood, and that sexual gratification withheld can transform the world. The play explores in depth the exploitative power sex holds over our species. Central to the women’s oath is a manipulation strategy; Lysistrata orders the women not merely to withhold sex but to simultaneously encourage the desire for it. “I will live at home in unsullied chastity .╯.╯. wearing my saffron gown and my sexiest make-up .╯.╯. to inflame my husband’s ardour .╯.╯. but I will never willingly yield myself to him” (ll. 217–24). Aristophanes foreshadows a world in which women will not ignore the men but deliberately use their charms to arouse them (audiences are made to assume that this will primarily be women like those of Sparta who have not barricaded themselves in the Acropolis, which is the second prong of the peace strategy). The playwright asks the spectator to imagine all Greek male citizens reduced to drooling, frustrated beasts as the Greek women tease them mercilessly but refuse to “put out.” This image of men reduced to docile sheep by unrequited sexual desire is solidified in the play’s final moments, when the military will of all Greece has been broken by the strike. A Spartan delegate, who has been reluctant to agree to the reconciliation (probably a reference to historical Spartan militancy) gives in when its representative proves to be a beautiful naked woman named Reconciliation. Given Sparta’s extreme warrior culture, the exhibition of one of their men tamed by being sex-starved implies that the rest of the Greek world has degraded perhaps to the level of zombie slaves, owing to their unsatisfied needs. While most of the play’s sexual content centers on humorous references and the global effects of chastity, one particularly famous scene provides a spectacle of sensuality that never fails to delight. Myrrhinne’s husband, Cinesias, comes looking for her, and what follows is a microcosm of the larger
conflict between the sexes, a struggle between lust and politics, with Cinesias using all the components of home and marriage against Myrrhine’s negotiation and resolve. Cinesias enters with the energy of a satyr (the half goat/half human attendants of Dionysus), made all the bolder by his enormous, fully erect phallus (a comic spin on the costume standard of Greek comedy, the usually flaccid phallus). He begs an audience with Myrrhine, using their infant son as bait: “Surely you can’t harden your heart against your baby! It’s five days now since he had a bath or a suck” (l. 880). He then reminds her that siding with the women is leaving their home unattended, but that more significantly, it leaves them both with “pain” resulting from secret rites of Aphrodite unperformed (l. 893). Cinesias makes a show of capitulating to the women’s demands. Though she will not agree to come home until the peace agreement is fulfilled, Myrrhine does agree to “lie down” with him in Pan’s Grotto. The repeatedly averted sex act that plays out in lines 915–957 would have similarly impacted audiences in Athens of the year 411 as it does today, continual building anticipation of a spectacle that is consistently aborted. Public sex was illegal at Athenian sanctuaries, as it is in most public places in the present day. Thus, for them to perform it in front of 14,000 spectators would have stretched the comic energy to the point of near scandal. Audiences are drawn into Cinesias’s frustration as Myrrhine first excuses herself to retrieve a bed and then, in sequence, a mattress, a pillow, a blanket, and two different bottles of perfume. When he accidentally reveals that he does not intend to push for peace as he promised, Myrrhine abandons her frustrated husband. The averted lovemaking stages Lysistrata’s challenge to the war and affirms the impact a sex strike would have on the men of Greece. The mastery of Aristophanes’ text is not that it is rife with dirty jokes, though it is, nor that some of those jokes are outright shocking, though he is a skilled author of bawdy lines and images. Rather, it is that those moments of lewdness amount to a hopeful suggestion that war might not be the true constant in human civilization. Sex might be even more essential to our needs, though we may only realize
The Handmaid’s Taleâ•…â•… 175 that when sex is taken away. By weaving bawdy references throughout the text, Aristophanes mandates sex as a more ubiquitous force than violence. Sexuality becomes the power that fuels the efforts of Greek women to forge a peace. Exploring themes of gender and hope more deeply, one finds that in Aristophanes’s fantasy world, sexuality gives women the ability to transform a reality in which they would otherwise have no influence on global affairs. Ben Fisler
ATWOOD, MARGARETâ•… The Handmaid’s Taleâ•… (1985)
Written at a time when strongly conservative elements (including antifeminist movements) were gaining power in the United States, The Handmaid’s Tale is a dystopian novel. It imagines a future in which contemporary utopian ideals for a better world have been erased and a very dark, nightmarish society has come to existence. In the novel, an environmental catastrophe has apparently rendered a large part of the country inaccessible due to radioactivity, and most men and women in the country have become sterile. The former American government has been replaced by a fascist system, called the Republic of Gilead, where women are deprived of their rights and basically enslaved so as to produce babies and bring the birth rate up. This system is set up and led by the “Commanders”—men who used to hold high positions in the old system—who receive the handmaids in their household and expect them to bear a child for their sterile wives. It is a highly hierarchical system in which every man and woman serves, in some way or another, the Commanders and their families. Oppression, gender, and heroism are the three thematic lenses through which we will critique a system which, though it is fictitious, addresses and speaks to very contemporary issues and concerns such as gender power and discrimination. Sophie Croisy
Gender in The Handmaid’s Tale
The Republic of Gilead is a complex and strict hierarchical system where gender separation is institutionalized and becomes the very root of oppression.
Men and women are subjected to the Law of Gilead, born out of a mix between the strictest biblical teachings and the certainties of a handful of Commanders. According to the Law, men and women have traditional heterosexual roles that cannot be jeopardized, so much so that nonnormative gender behaviors are eradicated. One time, the narrator, a Handmaid named Offred (her names comes from the Commander to whom she belongs, Fred), spots the dead bodies of two men with “purple placards hung around their necks: Gender Treachery. Their bodies still wear the Guardian uniforms. Caught together, they must have been.” There is no room for homosexuality in this society, which preaches the fulfillment of natural (meaning heterosexual) destinies. The women in Gilead, if not in charge of menial household tasks for the commanders, are either the commanders’ own wives, Econowives (the wives of the poorest men), Aunts, or Handmaids. The Aunts are the most visible representatives of the oppressive gendered system in place as they teach the last fertile women in Gilead how to become Handmaids. Though themselves oppressed by the system, their role is to perpetuate that oppression by promoting a fundamentalist Christian envisioning of women’s role in society. In the Center, and in Gilead, Handmaids-to-be learn that they cannot own anything anymore, not even an identity; they cannot read or write; they cannot want and are not allowed to complain. When Offred describes her time in the Center, she recalls the group sessions during which future Handmaids had to confess their sins and repent: One of them tells the story of her rape as a younger girl, and when one of the Aunts asks the question, “But whose fault was it?,” all the participants are expected to answer, “Her fault, her fault, her fault,” and they do so. The sexist argument that harm happens because the woman was looking for it becomes the starting point to a cruel redemptive therapy, at the end of which the women-turnedHandmaids surrender to “the ecstasy of abasement”: They admit their past worthlessness and guilt as “Unwomen” (free women) and accept that they will know redemption only if they “fulfill their biological destinies.” The active body as “instrument of pleasure” and “implement for the accomplishment of
176â•…â•… Atwood, Margaret [the owner’s] will” becomes shameful. However, the passive reproductive body is sanctified. It is a sacred vessel that can be used (and abused) by the leaders of the land to reach that higher collective biological purpose: the survival of the species. In the fundamentalist Gilead system, what is sanctified must be protected; thus, the female body remains hidden (all women wear veils when they go outside). The Handmaid’s body is only to be seen naked by her Commander, who, during an event called “the Ceremony,” has intercourse with the Handmaid in order to procreate the highly hoped-for child. The Gilead system of oppression, which is defined by Offred’s commander as an opportunity for women to be protected from any harm and play their natural roles “in peace. With all support and encouragement” is, in fact, a punitive system where torture, both mental and physical, or death comes to individuals who do not want to or cannot fulfill their duty for the community. In the Center, uncooperative women are physically abused: “It was the feet they’d do for a first offense. They used steel cables, frayed at the ends.” Moreover, if a Handmaid, after three trials in different households, fails to give birth to a child, she is taken away; nobody knows what happens to her—death is the guess. Never is the commander’s fertility questioned because “There is no such thing as a sterile man anymore, not officially. There are only women who are fruitful and women who are barren, that’s the law.” The hypocrisy and cruelty of the oppressive gendered system and its perpetrators lie in their daily criminal actions and in the existence of an underground web of prostitution organized by the Commanders themselves. In underground clubs, Commanders find alcohol and women and do in the obscurity of a back bedroom what the very system they have imposed forbids everyone below them to do, men and women alike. Sophie Croisy
Heroism in The Handmaid’s Tale
In a tyrannical, hierarchical society where the freedom of a past life must be forgotten, every act of memory can be considered an act of heroism. Remembering the past implies suffering but prevents hope from vanishing. The main character in the text, the handmaid call Offred, commits these
acts of memory throughout her detention and thus infuses hope from the past into the present. The quaintest memory, the memory of “laundromats. What I wore to them: shorts, jeans, jogging pants. What I put into them: my own clothes, my own money, money I had earned myself ” comes back to counter the Gilead system of repression based on keeping women oblivious, separating the genders, and forcing blind submission to the rules. These moments of remembering help her participate in the struggle against institutionalized forgetting, against the lies scattered by the leaders of Gilead. What is more important is remembering her name, though in this new order, she is given the name of her owner. She is Offred, but she keeps the knowledge of her real name “like something hidden, some treasure I’ll come back to dig up, one day,” and she projects herself into the future—a time when she will be allowed again to wear her name, to recover her stolen identity. If remembering is a silent, individual form of heroism in a system that forces forgetting upon its human elements, acting against that system is certainly the most subversive heroic endeavor. Offred is witness to different types of rebellious actions, some individual, others organized by a countergovernmental underground organization called Mayday. When still in training to become a handmaid, Offred goes through a coercive brainwashing program meant to force young women into a life of inaction and servitude. Moira, one of these women “in training,” tries to escape any chance she gets despite the knowledge that harsh punishment will come if she gets caught. She goes so far as to threaten the life of one of the Aunts with a metal prod. She takes the Aunt’s clothes and her pass, and she leaves the gymnasium pretending to be an Aunt. After her successful escape, Moira becomes the handmaids’ “fantasy. We hugged her to us. She was with us in secret, a giggle; she was lava beneath the crust of daily life. In the light of Moira, the Aunts were less fearsome and more absurd. Their power had a flaw to it.” This act of heroism resonates throughout the gymnasium and becomes another symbol of hope, another successful, counter-traumatic action in the midst of global trauma.
The Handmaid’s Taleâ•…â•… 177 Even Offred, once in contact with Mayday, starts playing a spy game. Her relationship with the Commander evolves as time passes by. He invites her at night to play board games and offers her presents; she, in turn, starts asking questions about the Gilead system. This forbidden “friendly” relationship (though the power structure that rules their official relationship is never questioned) takes Offred to an underground nightclub set up by the Commanders where waitresses/prostitutes serve and please the dignitaries of Gilead. Little by little, she sees more and learns more, and knowledge becomes another weapon of resistance: the knowledge that the Gilead system is not as closed and flawless as she was once told it was. Offred knows that she would be punished, or even killed, if anyone knew (especially the Commander’s wife, Serena Joy) about this unusual relationship with the Commander, but she continues it in order to know and tell what she knows. Offred’s official position in the Commander’s household is that of a vessel. She must give the Commander and his wife a child. Not fulfilling this “sacred duty” means death for her. For that reason, she will be convinced by Serena Joy, who fears that her husband might be infertile, to have intercourse with Nick, the driver, to increase her chances of getting pregnant. However, she goes to Nick more in search of physical closeness and pleasure, which is forbidden in Gilead. Again, if anyone knew about this treasonous behavior, she would die. Her actions are heroic in the sense that she knows death awaits her whatever path she chooses, but she chooses the hardest path: She does not stand still waiting for the expected child or its alternative, death. She chooses the path that will remind her how to feel and show her the reality of a corrupt system regularly upset by Mayday and its web of undercover rebels. Her acts of heroism are acts of hope. Sophie Croisy
Oppression in The Handmaid’s Tale
Gilead’s Commanders as well as a punitive organization called “the Eyes” have full power. The Commanders have set up a strict hierarchical system of oppression (though they define that system as the only way toward a better, safer, peaceful society) based on strict rules of conduct. Everyone has a
specific role and position that is inescapable once attributed. If this role is not fulfilled, punishment is immediate. The Eyes, a sort of secret police, take the disobedient ones away in a black car or van. What happens to the prisoners is unclear but likely to be connected to the regular “prayvaganzas,” punitive ceremonies where the enemies of Gilead are sentenced to death. Only the top of the Republic of Gilead’s hierarchy seems to have real power. The rest is submissive to the oppressive system set up by the Commanders, who define themselves as Gilead’s leaders and its protectors from the war raging outside. They lead that war and seem to own other parts of the American territory as a result of deadly fights between the soldiers of Gilead and the soldiers of an America that still exists outside the wall that surrounds and limits Gilead. The soldiers of Gilead have a basic practical function: to fight and die for Gilead. The Guardians of the Faith, a kind of local police, is used for “routine policing and other menial functions, digging up the Commander’s Wife’s garden.” They are given the power to keep things in order, but they have very limited rights. They are only male servants in the Gilead system and are not allowed contact with women. The Aunts are an organization of women whose role is to form young and fertile women to become Handmaids. Their only power lies in their role as teachers, though they teach other women through oppression, and what they teach is the obligation to accept the oppressive system now in place. Their training in behavior and religion must transform “Unwomen”—that is, modern, free American women with the right to chose their lives—into Handmaids (that is, birthing machines). The Handmaids must learn to dismiss and despise their old life (that is, the modern life of today’s real America), take pills to keep quiet and docile, and learn the new rules of a system that has turned them into “worthy vessels.” As a result, they have become objects of procreation. Once properly disciplined, they will each be assigned to a Commander’s family and will be forced to produce a child through forced sex with the Commander in the presence of his wife. The goal is to repopulate the land after the great nuclear catastrophe that has killed so many. The other
178â•…â•… Atwood, Margaret women within that system have no power at all: the Marthas are the housekeepers who are in charge of the Commanders’ households. They cook and clean, and that is the limit of their action. This new society is not only based on oppressive laws of conduct and a politics of fear (of the secret police), but also on the rejection of “otherness”: Its propaganda targets and vilifies specific cultural and religious groups that once shaped the American nation. African Americans are captured and resettled in “National Homeland One,” a place where nobody really knows what becomes of them. Jews and other religious groups whose vision of religion departs from Gilead’s are also targeted alongside homosexuals and old, unfertile women who are worthless to the Gilead system based on the need to reproduce. Newspapers and the television are heavily controlled and censored, and only the Commanders and their wives have access to the news. Those who are not at the top of the hierarchy have very few or no privileges and are kept in a state of ignorance about what is really happening in the country. All words in the streets have been replaced by signs, and reading and writing are forbidden to those like the Handmaids who are only supposed to obey the rules. This fundamentalist society has taken away the rights of its members in order to create an ordered society where idleness, drugs, “immoral” behaviors, and more specifically violence have no place. However, what really defines the system is the escalation of hatred between the different castes of Gilead, the erasure of entire cultural groups, and an underground prostitution web brought into existence by the Commanders themselves. Sophie Croisy
ATWOOD, MARGARETâ•… Surfacingâ•… (1972)
The Canadian author Margaret Atwood’s second novel Surfacing, one of her most famous works, is considered a landmark text in terms of its exploration of the connections between gender and environmental oppression. Surfacing is the story of an unnamed female narrator’s journey into the wilderness of Quebec in search of her missing father. Accompanying her are her lover Joe and the couple’s
friends David and Anna, all of whom think of the trip as a vacation and a chance for David, with Joe’s help, to make Random Samples, a film of various oddities that they see along the way—a house made of soda bottles, for example. Initially, the narrator reveals to the reader that she is divorced and has a child, but after the four reach her family’s cabin located on an island, and the search for her father begins, the narrator’s story changes. We learn that prior to her involvement with Joe, the narrator aborted a fetus that resulted from an illicit affair with a married man. As these truths “surface” over the course of the novel, the narrator’s voice becomes increasingly fragmented; she dissociates from her peers and heads into the wilderness, where she spends five days in a state of either madness or epiphany, depending on the reader’s interpretation. Surfacing examines such issues as the degradation of the natural environment by corporate interests, the treatment of women by men, and the marginalization of Canadian culture as a result of Canada’s proximity to the United States. Laura Wright
Gender in Surfacing
Margaret Atwood wrote Surfacing at the height of the second wave of the feminist movement, which gained momentum—in Canada as well as in the United States—during the late 1960s and early 1970s. Atwood’s nameless narrator is a woman who ultimately refuses to be victimized by the socially enforced gender roles that define her as a secondclass citizen because of her status as female. As she states at the end of the novel, “this above all, to refuse to be a victim.” Surfacing provides a sustained analysis of the ways that gender roles are generated by culture, and throughout the text, the narrator seeks to break free from the civilized feminine role that is expected of her by not only the men in her life—Joe, David, and her former lover—but also by women, particularly Anna and the narrator’s mother. Furthermore, in Surfacing, Atwood presents male gender roles as similarly problematic, a hindrance to any real connection between men and women. Atwood’s narrator is perhaps most conflicted with regard to her relationship choices and repro-
Surfacingâ•…â•… 179 ductive freedom; initially, she refers to her former lover as her “husband” and tells the audience that their child is at home. But other comments underscore a different reality, one characterized by the narrator’s guilt over the fact that she was involved with a married man and aborted their unborn child at his request. Early in the novel, she claims that she feels as if her former lover “imposed it on me.” The narrator’s reference to her baby as “it” is an indication that she did not carry the child to term, but the lies that she tells herself and the audience indicate the ways that she feels trapped by gender expectations that demand her to be a “good girl.” Another way that the narrative illustrates the conflict that women feel with regard to the roles they are expected to play is evidenced when Anna, putting on her makeup, tells the narrator that David “↜‘doesn’t like to see me without it,’ and then, contradicting herself, ‘He doesn’t know I wear it.’↜” Throughout the text, David is presented as the enforcer of gender roles, a man who monitors his wife’s body, telling her at one point that she is “eating too much” and getting fat, while he flaunts his extramarital affairs before her; his comments about her body make her too insecure to leave him. At one point in the novel, David tells Anna to avoid participating in the women’s liberation movement: “None of that Women’s Lib .╯.╯. or you’ll be out on the street. I won’t have one in my house, they’re preaching random castration, they get off on that.” However, when the narrator begins to discard, bit by bit, the submissive and victimized female role that she had maintained at the beginning of the novel and that Anna maintains throughout, the consequences are telling. First, by refusing to marry Joe, the narrator reverses typical gender role expectations; she, not the man, is unwilling to give up her independence. In response, Joe behaves in a more typically feminine manner, claiming that “sometimes .╯.╯. I get the feeling you don’t give a shit about me.” Furthermore, when the narrator refuses David’s advances, he calls her a “tight-ass bitch” and accuses her of being a lesbian. These criticisms are attempts to show the narrator her gendered place, to force her to conform to male expectations of submissive female behavior. But men are not the only ones who police gender roles; Anna criticizes the narrator as
well, calling her “inhuman.” The narrator realizes that refusing to have sex with David causes Anna to resent her: “[B]ecause I hadn’t given in, it commented on her.” The narrator ultimately refuses to uphold the facade of wife and mother, admitting that she was never married and that she had had an abortion. At this point, she acknowledges that everyone wants to save the world in one way or another—“men think they can do it with guns, women with their bodies”—and then she turns her back on this way of thinking, destroying David and Joe’s film, smashing all of the mirrors in the cabin, taking off all her clothes, and heading out into the wilderness. She gives up her name and states, “I tried for all those years to be civilized but I’m not and I’m through pretending.” The novel ends with the narrator waiting for a new way to define herself, a way that is not dependent on female submission and male dominance. Laura Wright
Nationalism in Surfacing
When Margaret Atwood wrote Surfacing in 1972, Canada was characterized by a void in terms of its national conception of itself. Canada’s national identity has evolved over three main stages since its colonization in the 18th century. It was viewed, first, as a colonial or provincial outpost of empire; second, as a colonial nation; and finally, as a kind of country without a specific identity. Furthermore, Canada’s relationship with its imposing neighbor the United States has shaped its national identity. For example, prior to 1965, Canadian policy was one of cooperation with and emulation of the United States; however, with the Lyndon Johnson presidency, Canada’s desire to imitate was replaced by a sense of moral righteousness as it sought to distance itself from its neighbor’s escalating involvement in the Vietnam War. To some extent, it is this anti-U.S. sensibility that Atwood portrays in Surfacing. Atwood examines the complexities of the national conception of the “nice Canadian” in the late 1960s while she simultaneously critiques the artifice of niceness by tracing her unnamed narrator’s descent into madness in the wilderness of Quebec. Over the course of the
180â•…â•… Atwood, Margaret narrative, the protagonist is forced to examine her self-proclaimed victimization by both the American technological advances that encroach on the Canadian wilderness and by the men with whom she has been involved. The narrator ultimately learns that her father has drowned, and at this point, she literally disrobes and heads into the wilderness, where she lives for five days, hidden from her companions who, in exasperation, return to the mainland. The narrator’s sense of self, as a member of a national community, is obtained at least in part from her perception of her world through visual images that depict the nation. As an illustrator, she had been working on a book called Quebec Folk Tales at the time of her father’s disappearance. She creates the visual images that accompany her nation’s mythology, and despite the fact that she wants to vary her presentation, to include a loup-garou, or werewolf, story in the collection, the narrator realizes that her editor has taken it out because “it was too rough for him.” The national image that she is allowed to portray, therefore, is that of a nice, nonviolent Canadian. Furthermore, as a participant in the market, she is limited in her creativity as well as in her conception of a world beyond the fairy tales that her editor—and her nation—consider acceptable. She asks, “What’s the alternative to princesses? What else will parents buy for their children?” The narrator’s art is a commodity, an element in the consumer culture of Canada’s nationalist consciousness. Another visual narrative that shapes the narrator’s sense of her place in the Canadian nation is the photo album that she finds in the cabin. This album, with its chronologically arranged familial images, conflates time and space; photographs of the narrator appear alongside those of distant and longdead relatives. While she can look at the images of “grandmothers and grandfathers first, distant ancestors,” they are nonetheless “strangers, in face-front firing-squad poses.” The narrator is able to trace the “civilizing” process that occurs over the course of her life by examining the succession of these photographs, which culminate in school pictures from her teenage years. In these she sees herself as the acceptable nice Canadian in “stiff dresses, crinolines and tulle, layered like store birthday cakes,” and she claims, “I was civilized at last, the finished product.”
Similarly, David and Joe control the visual national narrative through their filming and then rearranging the “random samples” that they see on their journey. The film stems in part from David’s desire to capture images of the “real” Canadian nation, the “uncivilized border country” of the Quebec wilderness that Joe thinks of as “reality: a marginalized economy and grizzled elderly men.” At the end of Surfacing, the narrator destroys David’s film and heads into the wilderness to become a kind of werewolf, the loup-garou that she is not allowed to portray in her art. During these five days, the narrator is transformed from a woman into a wild animal, and over the course of her madness, she exists in opposition to the idea that the Canadian national consciousness must always be “nice,” must always exist in opposition to the “American.” By the end of the narrative, the protagonist is able to abandon labels that connote an appropriate national identity. Laura Wright
Nature in Surfacing
Margaret Atwood’s second novel, Surfacing, has been hailed as an ecofeminist classic because of the connections she makes in the narrative between the destruction of the environment as a result of capitalist interests and the domination of women by men. Atwood renders the natural world in Surfacing, particularly the remote island in northern Quebec where the novel is set, as a natural site compromised by the intrusion of people the nameless narrator assumes to be “American.” In the novel’s first two sentences, the narrator notes the way that the landscape has changed as a result of development and increased population since she last headed north: I can’t believe I’m on this road again, twisting along the lake where the white birches are dying, the disease is spreading up from the south.╯.╯.╯. But this is still near the city limits; we didn’t go through, it’s swelled enough to have a bypass, that’s success. This opening sequence establishes a dichotomy that Atwood’s narrator maintains throughout Surfac-
The Confessions of St. Augustineâ•…â•… 181 ing, the insidious and environmentally destructive attributes of “the south,” particularly citizens of the United States—whom all of the characters in the novel equate with environmental “disease”—as juxtaposed with the Canadians’ supposed innate environmentalism. The narrator, along with her lover Joe and married friends Anna and David, head to the island in search of the narrator’s missing father. As they move from the city further into the wilderness, the characters, particularly David, comment on the ways that the United States has encroached on the Canadian wilderness. At one point, he claims, “this is great .╯.╯. better than in the city. If we could only kick out the fascist pig Yanks and the capitalists this would be a neat country.” The term American is used throughout the text to designate anyone or any behavior that endangers the natural environment, and two American fishermen are central to the narrative’s examination of the destruction of nature. While they are out fishing on the lake, the narrator, Anna, Joe, and David encounter two men in a fishing boat with an “American flag on the front and another on the back.” One of the men asks if they have caught anything; “the other American throws his cigar butt over the side” and makes disparaging comments about the lake. The narrator notes that despite the fact that “we used to think they were harmless and funny and inept and faintly loveable,” “we”—Canadians—now see that “they”—Americans—pose a very real threat to the pristine wilderness of North Quebec. For example, when a man claiming to be a member of “the Detroit branch of the Wildlife Protection Association of America” appears and offers to buy the narrator’s father’s home, David warns that the man is a covert CIA agent out to procure water for the United States: ‘It’s obvious,’ he says. ‘They’re running out of water, clean water, they’re dirtying up all of theirs, right?’ As the four head back to the house after their encounter with the Americans, the narrator provides an amazing description of the lake: Loon voices in the distance; bats flitter past us, dipping over the water surface, flat calm now, the shore things, white-gray rocks and dead trees doubling themselves in the dark
mirror. Around us there is the illusion of infinite space or of no space.╯.╯.╯. It’s like moving on air, nothing beneath us holding us up. This passage, in that it describes the narrator’s illusory sensation of weightlessness and infinite space, alludes to the impermanence of boundaries, particularly those between the characters’ assumptions about Canadian and American environmental behavior. Later, when the foursome comes upon a dead heron, killed and “strung .╯.╯. up like a lynch victim,” the narrator questions why anyone would kill the bird. She asserts that “it must have been the Americans” who kill the bird just “to prove they could do it.” However, when the narrator encounters the “Americans” several pages later, she discovers that they are actually from Canada, just like her. The term American, then, becomes a kind of label that the narrator applies to any human being who causes environmental harm. She claims, “I realized it wasn’t the men I hated, it was the Americans, the human beings, men and women both. They’d had their chance but they had turned against the gods, and it was time for me to choose sides.” The side that she chooses is the side of nature: She sheds her clothes, leaves the house, and goes to live in the wilderness, determined not to disturb “anything else, that way there would be more room for the animals, they would be rescued.” Laura Wright
AUGUSTINE, SAINTâ•… The Confessions of St. Augustineâ•… (a.d. 397–398)
The Confessions of St. Augustine is probably the first book-length autobiography and certainly the most influential. Saint Augustine of Hippo (a.d. 353–430) pioneered the introspective study of one’s own life; for him, this effort would ultimately lead to knowledge of God, to whom Confessions is addressed. Confessions is divided into 13 books. The first nine contain a narrative of Augustine’s life up until age 33, focusing on his religious and moral development. Augustine’s life here is quite busy. In traveling to Carthage, Rome, and Milan to study and teach, he makes many friends and encounters various reli-
182â•…â•… Augustine, Saint gious and philosophical movements, most of which carry him further from God. Much of Confessions’s narrative is marked by Augustine’s regret over his youthful sinfulness. As a middle-aged Christian writing Confessions, he knows the moral standard he should have adhered to, and he laments that he had previously ignored God in favor of the fleeting pleasures of sex, vanity, and lawlessness. The climax of the narrative books is Augustine’s conversion to Christianity, which occurs dramatically in a Milan garden. The final four books are more directly philosophical and theological. In them, Augustine explores the nature of time and memory, and he interprets the biblical book of Genesis, which itself provided so much of the literary and theological inspiration for the Confessions. Augustine characterizes himself as a seeker, as expressed in Confessions’s first paragraph, where he says to God, “You have made us for yourself, and our heart is restless till it rests in you.” To read Confessions is to enter a world of thought more complex and fascinating than nearly any other. Jonathan Malesic
Childhood in The Confessions of St. Augustine
A person’s memories are the richest source of material for an autobiography, and so we should expect an autobiographer to have the least to say about his or her birth and infancy. Not so for the exceedingly inquisitive Augustine. He devotes the first book of Confessions to searching for knowledge about his birth, infancy, and childhood, using his experiences in those stages to demonstrate to the reader the problem of human sin. Augustine even wants to know if he had a life prior to his birth. He finds no answer but trusts that God has one. In describing his character as an infant, Augustine relies partly on his observations of other infants. He sees that they greedily want milk all the time and cry when that desire is not immediately satisfied. Augustine assumes that he, too, must have been a greedy baby. Augustine is keen to the power of words throughout his life, and he devotes several pages of book 1 to his learning to speak. At first, he could only wail incoherently to indicate his desires. By
imitating adults and, later, with formal schooling, Augustine becomes more adept at using language, but he says that he mostly did so for immoral purposes. In his final assessment of these early years, Augustine describes himself as “so tiny a child, so great a sinner.” Augustine’s view of childhood is thus very different from our contemporary notion that children are innocent and naturally generous. Augustine sees himself as a sinful child because he believes that all human beings are inherently sinful at birth and need to be saved from that sin. This doctrine, known as original sin, has roots in the biblical story of Adam and Eve. According to Genesis 2 and 3, the first human beings were sinless, but they disobeyed God when they ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil after Eve was tempted to do so by the serpent. This act of disobedience was the first sin. As a consequence, Adam and Eve must one day die, and so must all of their descendants, the entire human race, because the guilt from that first sin is passed down through generations. Thus, Augustine portrays his own infancy and childhood as reflecting the biblical account of the infancy and childhood of the human race. This theme carries through book 2, in which Augustine recounts a period in his adolescence, the cusp between childhood and adulthood. Perhaps the most famous episode in Confessions is the theft of pears that Augustine and his adolescent friends commit in book 2. The episode is cast as a reflection of the fall of Adam and Eve: Not only is taking from a fruit tree at the heart of the story, but like Adam, Augustine steals mainly for companionship’s sake. As he admits at the end of book 2, “alone I would not have done it.” He sees his yielding to peer pressure as not merely the action of a foolish youth but a malicious act against the will of God. He blames only himself for his spiritual immaturity. Augustine’s conversion to Christianity in the Milan garden (recounted in book 8) is followed in book 9 by his baptism, which makes him a member of the Catholic Church. This baptism is like a second birth to him. In Christian theology, the person who is baptized “dies to sin” and is born to new life. The newborn Christian Augustine loses his voice for much of book 9 because of a series of illnesses.
The Confessions of St. Augustineâ•…â•… 183 The only way he can communicate the joy he feels over his conversion is through crying, just as he communicated as a child. The crying, however, has been transformed from an expression of sinful greed to one of pure happiness with God. In Latin, the language in which Augustine wrote, the word infans literally means “unable to speak.” In his baptism, he gains a second infancy and childhood, but this time, the grace of God and the care of his new Christian “family” (the church) will help him to avoid the sinful selfishness that characterized his first infancy. Sin for Augustine is a problem as universal as infancy, but it has a solution in becoming a child of God via membership in the church. Jonathan Malesic
Love in The Confessions of St. Augustine
In Augustine’s outlook, love is most basically desire: desire to possess an object, desire to be with a particular person, desire for knowledge or goodness. But not all desires get to be called by the name love. It is possible to desire the wrong things, or to desire good things in the wrong way. Much of the plot of the Confessions is driven by the conflict between genuine love and the disordered form of desire known as lust. To Augustine, human beings are defined largely by their loves: They are good to the extent that they love the right things in the right way, and they are sinful when their desires are disordered. Augustine says that as an adolescent, his greatest desire “was simply to love and to be loved.” This desire in itself is good, but Augustine goes about fulfilling it the wrong way, causing him to sin and to be miserable. When Augustine goes away to Carthage to study, he has many friends and lovers. But these were no more than “illicit loves,” because rather than enjoying real friendship with these people, he sought carnal pleasures with them, casting himself into “the hell of lust.” Looking back on those times, Augustine determines that he was never truly in love with anyone. In fact he “was in love with love,” the feeling he got when he was falling in love. Because he did not yet know what real love was, the mistake was easy to make. Augustine continues to give lust a large role in his life, as he takes up with a woman and has a child with her out of wedlock. Their “love is a matter of physical sex,” not real partnership.
Even Augustine’s friendships at this stage exhibit improper love. In book 4, Augustine tells about a close friendship he shared with a childhood acquaintance. They shared many interests, and at the time Augustine “felt that my soul and his were ‘one soul in two bodies.’↜” But even this love was ultimately improper, because Augustine loved this friend disproportionately. This unnamed friend falls ill and eventually dies, causing Augustine no end of misery. The closeness of the relationship is exactly what makes the end of the relationship so painful. Looking back on this episode, Augustine realizes that he loved this friend “as a substitute for” God. Augustine’s lesson here is that someone should never treat another as “half [one’s] soul.” Human beings are mortal and finite and thus should not receive such strong devotion. God alone must be loved so strongly, and because God is infinite and immortal, loving him will never be a disappointment. In subsequent books, Augustine gains new friends and loves them more appropriately. In book 6, he writes much about Alypius and Nebridius, with whom Augustine lives and shares many intellectual interests. The love these friends show Augustine helps make him a better person. Alypius’s honesty, which he shows by refusing to take bribes while he held a government job, seems to rub off on the sinful Augustine, who says that these two “friends I loved indeed for their own sake; and I felt that in return they loved me for my sake.” The love among Augustine, Alypius, and Nebridius is good partly because it eventually leads beyond itself and toward love for God. Augustine does not convert to Christianity alone but with these two friends, as they continue to exert a positive moral influence on him. After Augustine’s conversion and baptism, his desire for God only grows. He asks himself “what I love when I love my God,” and he knows that in loving God, he does not love the physical beauty and the pleasure he loves in material things, because God is not a physical thing. Still, God grants Augustine spiritual pleasures beyond any physical ones, leading him to write what amounts to a love hymn to God, saying, “Late have I loved you, beauty so old and so new,” and extolling
184â•…â•… Augustine, Saint God’s accomplishments in Augustine’s life and how ardently he now desires God. All of the lesser loves Augustine has—for physical pleasure, for companionship, for knowledge— imitate to some degree the love he should properly have for God. And if Augustine’s loves help determine what he becomes, then loving God properly will make him more like God in goodness and wisdom. Jonathan Malesic
Religion in The Confessions of St. Augustine
As a religious autobiography, The Confessions is in one sense entirely about religion. Augustine is in search of God, but God can be found only through the doctrines and disciplines of true religion. The problem for Augustine is in discovering which religion is true. He finds the truth in Catholic Christianity, but he takes a circuitous path to it. Augustine lived in an era when several religions competed for adherents. Although Christianity was becoming the norm in the Roman Empire, many still honored the old Roman pantheon, and a sect called the Manicheans held some sway. Furthermore, the Christianity of this time was highly varied, as authority within the church was diffuse, and many points of doctrine were not yet settled. Augustine’s own family exhibits this religious diversity: His mother, Monica, is a Christian (later to be acknowledged as a saint in the Catholic Church), while his father, Patrick, is a longtime pagan. Monica’s practice of true religion leads her to live a life of prayer and moral rectitude. She, in turn, prays constantly for Augustine to become a full member of the church and actively encourages him to give up his premarital sexual relationships (which the church sees as sinful) and to marry a Catholic girl. Patrick, meanwhile, is portrayed as short-tempered and lustful, encouraging Augustine to commit sexual sin. He becomes a Christian late in his life, and Augustine remarks that this conversion ended Patrick’s bad behavior. As a young teacher of rhetoric at Carthage in North Africa, Augustine is drawn to the Manicheans, who see the world as a battleground between the equal and opposite forces of light and darkness. Augustine’s interest in the Manicheans reaches its
height in book 5 as he anticipates meeting Faustus, the great bishop of the sect. Faustus turns out to be a letdown, as his knowledge is slight and “conventional,” not the profound wisdom Augustine had expected. But by the end of book 5, Augustine has moved to Milan in Italy and met Ambrose, the Christian bishop there. Ambrose is the mirror image of Faustus. Both men are bishops, but Faustus is part of the false religion of Manichaeanism, while Ambrose is a leader in the true religion of Christianity. Though both are renowned for their good speaking styles, “in content there could be no comparison,” for Ambrose is expounding the truth and exposing the pretty lies of teachers like Faustus. Ambrose continues to influence Augustine, leading him to join the Catholic Church. The Manicheans’ failure to grasp the truth is illustrated in their inadequate account of the presence of evil in the world. They believe that both God and evil are physical substances in conflict with each other. This doctrine concerns Augustine because it implies that God is finite, something he knows cannot be true. Augustine discovers a Christian answer to this problem in book 7, after reading books of Platonist philosophers who espouse many semireligious teachings, including the idea that evil is not an existing substance but, rather, the absence of good. Although the Platonists lack the full religious truth, which can be found only in Christianity, they have elements of the truth (including this teaching on the nature of evil) and are at any rate far closer to true religious doctrine than the Manicheans. Because all that is genuinely true comes from God, true philosophical doctrines can lead a person a step closer to God. For example, the Platonists rightly recognize that the Word of God, the principle of order in the universe, is itself light, but they do not recognize, as Christians do, that this Word became a human being, Jesus Christ. Thus, Augustine’s intellectual encounter with Platonism helps confirm for him the truth of Christianity. He eventually converts fully to Christianity after an intense emotional experience that leads him to “pick up and read” the letters of the Christian apostle Paul, where Augustine reads an admonition to give up sin and to ally himself with Christ.
Emmaâ•…â•… 185 Augustine’s conversion becomes formal in book 9 when he, his friends, and his son are baptized in a joyous ceremony. At last, Augustine has found true religion, where he can know and love God fully and properly. Although orthodox (correct) beliefs are indispensable to true religion, for Augustine it is not only a matter of belief. True religion is also marked by true worship practices, good morals, healthy community life, and wise authority. All of these Augustine finds in Catholic Christianity, where he receives the antidote to the spiritual restlessness that plagued his young adulthood. Jonathan Malesic
AUSTEN, JANEâ•… Emmaâ•… (1816)
Emma Woodhouse, “handsome, clever, and rich,” lives near the village of Highbury with her father in the early 1800s. Although good friends with their neighbor, Mr. Knightley, Emma is lonely after her governess marries and moves out, so she decides to take Harriet Smith, a beautiful young girl of unknown parentage, under her wing. Against Mr. Knightley’s advice, Emma dissuades Harriet from marrying her farmer suitor, Robert Martin, and instead persuades her that the vicar, Mr. Elton, is in love with her. Unfortunately, however, it turns out Mr. Elton has designs not on Harriet but on Emma herself. Emma indignantly refuses his proposal and tries to heal Harriet’s disappointment. Emma’s governess’s new stepson, Frank Churchill, comes to visit Highbury and enlivens the village by initiating social events that include Jane Fairfax, who has recently returned to Highbury after a childhood spent elsewhere. Another arrival is Mr. Elton’s new bride, who attempts to upstage Emma by asserting herself as the “lady patroness” of Highbury. The town expects Frank and Emma to make a couple, but Emma has plans for Frank and Harriet. However, Harriet now fancies Mr. Knightley, which horrifies Emma as she realizes that she herself loves Mr. Knightley. When Frank’s adopted mother dies, he announces that he has been secretly engaged to Jane Fairfax for several months. While shocked at the subterfuge, Highbury welcomes the marriage. With Frank
out of the way, Mr. Knightley proclaims his love for Emma, and they, too, plan a wedding. Harriet returns to Robert Martin, and Emma vows never again to meddle in people’s lives. Sally Palmer
Coming of Age in Emma
Typically, a bildungsroman features a protagonist who, over the course of the novel, undergoes significant personal development in a spiritual, moral, psychological, or social sphere. Jarred by loss or discontentment into embarking on a literal or metaphorical journey out of her former milieu, the heroine encounters trials, obstacles, and clashes with other characters or with the existing social order that eventually bring about her maturation. Finally, the protagonist grows into womanhood and, adopting new values and spirit, reenters the social order as a changed being assuming a new role. Emma is such a novel. As it opens, Emma Woodhouse is a young woman newly bereft of her governess and companion, the soon-to-be-married Miss Taylor. No replacement is envisioned because of Emma’s age, so Emma is propelled from her role as a chaperoned daughter of the house into a new role as grown-up mistress of her widowed father’s household. While this would ordinarily signify a considerable change in status, Emma considers herself already entirely grown up. With the means and authority to manage and distribute goods and servants, she declares that she will never marry because she already has all the consequence, means, and power she could desire. At this presumed pinnacle of life, Emma decides likewise to manage the personal lives of her friends. This undertaking, resulting in unforeseen negative consequences and the subsequent humility they engender, represents Emma’s journey into maturity. At the journey’s end, she will have learned that each person must make his or her own decisions; no one else can know better about their lives than the principals. She will also know herself better—that she is not, in fact, independent, but relies on the companionship and advice of her friend Mr. Knightley for her growth and happiness. Emma’s initial foray into life management targets the bachelor vicar of her parish, Mr. Elton. Without taking much care for his own preference
186â•…â•… Austen, Jane or welfare, Emma decides to find him a wife, deeming that he should fall in love with Harriet Smith, a pretty young girl of unknown origins whom Emma is determined to elevate through improved social graces and marrying into the gentry. Emma sets about arranging this romance chiefly by persuading the gullible Harriet of Mr. Elton’s admiration and marital intentions. Likewise heedless of the feelings and hopes of Mr. Martin, Harriet’s farmer suitor, Emma directs Harriet to refuse him, to leave the way clear for building up Harriet’s hopes for Elton. When it transpires that Mr. Elton has no intention of marrying Harriet, Emma encounters her first setback as a manager of others’ lives. She is “concerned and ashamed, and resolved to do such things no more.” However, her repentance is based only on the failure of her scheme, rather than on any apprehension of damage to the feelings of those she has manipulated. Emma soon immerses herself in the village’s social life with such families as the Bateses, the Westons, and the Coxes, and decides to encourage Harriet to think romantically again, this time of Frank Churchill, the stepson of Emma’s former governess. Emma imagines Frank is in love with herself but decides he will get over it soon enough and attach himself to Harriet. But, as the novel progresses, Emma discovers Frank has been secretly engaged for many months to Jane Fairfax, a young woman living with the Bateses, and then she finds Harriet is not in love with Frank but with Mr. Knightley, the family friend whose love Emma has taken for granted as meant only for herself. At this point, having insulted Miss Bates, Emma is chastised by Mr. Knightley for her lack of charity and sensitivity. Realizing the folly of trying to arrange other people’s feelings and lives, she apologizes to the Bateses and tries to amend her image in the eyes of Mr. Knightley. From now on, as a genuinely mature lady patroness, Emma will allow those around her to suit themselves with their own choices without her advice and assistance, and she will ameliorate her own opinions by conferring with the always just and correct Mr. Knightley. Ironically, it is as Emma assumes a position of actual authority that she relinquishes her active pretensions to managing others’ lives. She has “learned her lesson” and is now
ready to be a real help to her neighbors rather than to manipulate their affairs to suit her own desires. Mr. Elton’s chosen bride, Augusta Elton, serves as a foil to Emma’s newly matured self, in demonstrating the folly of assuming to take charge of the “lesser” characters populating one’s neighborhood. Devoid of the manners and sense of decorum with which Emma has been raised, the upstart Mrs. Elton, heady with the improved status of her recent marriage, rushes to put herself forward in Highbury. Uninvited, she arranges Jane Fairfax’s social life and livelihood, proposes to form a musical club with Emma, and volunteers to hostess Mr. Knightley’s parties. Her officiousness is regarded as deplorably ill-bred by Emma, who only a few weeks previously was guilty of much the same behavior with regard to Harriet and Mr. Elton. Seeing Mrs. Elton as others might have seen Emma herself is an eye opener to Emma, who has also seen the result of her unwise encouragement of Harriet’s hopes, and this helps to raise her consciousness of the wisdom of knowing one’s place and not exceeding one’s proper authority. Mrs. Elton, unlike Emma, does not arrive at greater knowledge or maturity and remains as she is, a constant reminder of ill-bred behavior and immature egotism. As readers, we are not allowed to know of the previous journey that may have brought Mr. Knightley, the proprietor of Donwell Abbey, to his current sure-footed status as an infallible arbiter and example of proper, wise opinions and behavior. Sixteen years older than Emma, he has guided her along her journey with advice and criticism since her infancy. While we may find strange his declaration of love, “I have blamed you, and lectured you, and you have borne it as no other woman in England would have,” we cannot quarrel with the results of his tutelage. Censuring Emma’s manipulation of Harriet and Robert Martin, warning her about Mr. Elton, finding fault with her flirtatious behavior with Frank and neglect of Jane Fairfax, and excoriating her for her insult to Miss Bates, Mr. Knightley has forced Emma to rethink and repent her foolish and wrongful behavior. Without such necessary correction, Emma would, like Mrs. Elton, her father, and Frank, still be wandering the paths of an endless
Emmaâ•…â•… 187 journey to maturity and self-knowledge, rather than having come of age at last. Sally Palmer
Community in Emma
In Jane Austen’s day, before steam engines increased mobility beyond the powers of natural human and animal locomotion, community was largely a geographical matter. Although relatives and friends kept in touch with letters and long visits, it was the neighbors to whom one turned for day-to-day sociality and protection. People such as the Woodhouses in Emma depended on rural neighborhood residents like Mr. Knightley and on those in the adjacent village of Highbury for mutual aid; emotional support; and sharing of resources, news, and social enjoyment. This geographical community also provided care for the sick and dying, as well as socialization and strengthening of local mores to be passed along from generation to generation. This community was organized according to class differences, yet every member had a role to play. In Austen’s ideal community, one of the mutual responsibilities is entertainment. Everyone must take a turn at giving dinners, card parties, or other social events. In the Highbury community, the Westons, the Coles, Frank Churchill, and Mr. Knightley provide opportunities for socialization as hosts. Those with talents for singing or playing are expected to contribute to the general entertainment, as when Emma and Jane are pressed into service at the pianoforte, with Frank joining in, and when Frank attempts to organize a game at the Box Hill picnic. Another important function of Austen’s community is the dissemination of news and updates about neighbors and friends, seen as an expression of social and emotional caring and support. Mr. Weston provides enthusiastic fulfillment of this function, as he lets everyone know as soon as he receives each letter from his son Frank and airs the contents of these letters as they pertain to mutual interests. Miss Bates, while tedious, is still trying to perform her duty to the community by talking about small matters and letting people know every piece of news about Jane Fairfax. Those who are negligent in this social duty are viewed with dissatisfaction, such as Frank, who deceives people about his affairs; and Jane, who is
too reserved, refusing to share her views or enter into the general interest in community relationships. One manifestation of community support is the general interest in the state of every member’s health. Thus, health is a common and important topic of conversation at every gathering. Mr. Woodhouse has developed his interest in this subject far beyond what is necessary for politeness, yet still he provides a measure of community caring when he inquires minutely about everyone’s health and prescribes measures for taking care of small ailments. Medical knowledge, so scarce in Austen’s time, was thus shared as people tried to discover how others had successfully overcome health problems and attempted to protect one another from illnesses that could strike at any time from any direction, with potentially catastrophic results. Because people living close to one another must be able to get along, good manners are very important to the Highbury community. Visitors and new members, therefore, are welcomed politely. Jane Fairfax, Frank Churchill, and Mrs. Elton are treated warmly upon their arrival, despite private reservations such as those entertained by Emma and Mrs. Weston about Mrs. Elton. Faults and foibles of community members—such as Miss Bates’s garrulousness, Mr. Woodhouse’s hypochondria, and Emma’s snobbery—are tolerated with kindness. The general civility of the community is considered so important that when Emma ruptures it with her ill-natured insult of Miss Bates at Box Hill, Mr. Knightley takes steps to reproach her for her gaffe, and she corrects it as soon as she can, aware of the necessity for courtesy and amity among neighbors. Mr. Knightley, the community watchdog, also points out to Emma that she is being insufficiently friendly to Jane Fairfax. Other members of the community ignore insults in order to maintain good feeling, such as when the Martins continue to be kind to Harriet even after her snub of them and her refusal of Robert. Austen considers community so important that in Emma she ridicules, punishes, and otherwise disparages characters who exercise obligations of neighborliness insufficiently, just as much as she castigates characters who display flaws of moral character. Frank Churchill, Jane Fairfax, and Mr. and Mrs. Elton all suffer from Austen’s characterization.
188â•…â•… Austen, Jane In an England faced with political threats from abroad and internal upheavals caused by incipient industrialization, Jane Austen clearly saw the community of country villages as a safe haven, perhaps the only haven, from frightening social changes. In Emma we see how a group of neighbors, only 25 miles from London, can preserve one another in relative peace, stasis, and tranquility from the depredations that threatened to tear the larger country apart in urban centers. While Emma is fiction, and the social structure on which the novel is based was an archaic institution, we can still learn from Austen’s vision that a concern for those around us, nourished by mutual respect, kindness, and generosity, can enhance life in any situation. Even—maybe especially—in a global world, it is important to get along with one’s neighbors. Sally Palmer
Social Class in Emma
So prevalent is the topic of social class in Emma that it is possible to read the novel as a manual on what it means to be truly upper-class, and on the proper observance of class distinctions and obligations. All the problems in the plot are caused by one or more characters’ faulty perceptions of rank and its obligations. When these erroneous ideas are corrected and the characters are sorted into their fit places in the social hierarchy, peace reigns. At the outset, we learn that Emma is “first in consequence” in her sphere. High social rank depends on owning property, having a large income independent of labor, and belonging to an old and distinguished family, known as having “connexions.” Further class distinctions include one’s education, appearance, and “breeding,” or manners. As a Woodhouse and the mistress of Hartfield, Emma is looked up to by everyone. The only other character on her social level is Mr. Knightley, proprietor of Donwell Abbey and the highest-ranking gentleman in the area. While Emma’s behavior and ideas about the meaning of rank are frequently erroneous, Mr. Knightley’s opinions and actions can always be taken as a model for proper upper-class behavior. Because Emma’s middle-class governess, Mrs. Weston, has recently risen into the upper class by marrying into a “respectable family,” albeit one which
has only recently made its fortune and acquired its “seat,” or house, Emma aspires to similarly raise her new friend Harriet, of unknown parentage, to a higher class. Emma, a social snob, feels that to elevate Harriet into the gentry would “detach her from bad acquaintance and introduce her into good society.” Mr. Knightley, however, opposes Emma’s friendship with, and plans for, Harriet. He feels nothing good can come from crossing class boundaries; that raising Harriet’s expectations will make her unhappy with the situation in which her birth and circumstances have placed her. And so it proves: Under Emma’s tutelage, Harriet loses her first suitor and raises her expectations for a husband beyond what is realistic. Emma rejects Harriet’s suitor, Robert Martin, as being “vulgar and illiterate” because he is a farmer, even though we see that he reads novels, writes a good letter, and is polite and respectful. Although Harriet fancies Robert, she takes Emma’s advice and refuses Martin, focusing her marriage hopes instead, with Emma’s encouragement, on Mr. Elton. But Mr. Elton, also hoping to advance himself socially by marriage, refuses to consider Harriet, deeming her beneath his level. This causes Harriet great unhappiness, until she begins to hope that Mr. Knightley himself might marry her. When Emma learns that Harriet has so far lost sight of her own intrinsic social level as to aspire to Mr. Knightley, she is horrified. She realizes the evil of raising expectations to beyond one’s class and considers that Harriet’s unequal marriage to Mr. Knightley, while an amazing elevation on her side, would be “debasement,” “evil,” and “horrible folly” for Mr. Knightley. Emma thus abandons Harriet as a confidante, whereupon Harriet returns to Robert Martin and achieves happiness in the associations belonging to her own class, from which she should never have tried to rise. Another illustration of the impropriety of trying to rise in class is the behavior of Mrs. Elton. Mr. Elton marries Augusta Hawkins because she has substantial wealth, yet this wealth was only recently earned through her father’s business, and her family is “nobody.” Mrs. Elton tries to correct this deficit by continually accentuating and flaunting her relationship with her sister’s husband, Mr. Suckling, a man with “extensive grounds” at Maple Grove. She also tries to assume equality with Mr. Knightley and
Pride and Prejudiceâ•…â•… 189 Emma by calling them by familiar names, proposing social gatherings with them, and otherwise ignoring the distinctions of class by failing to show the proper respect and humility to those above her on the social ladder. Making herself odious with her egotistical pretensions and her determination to insult lowerclass Harriet, Mrs. Elton shows her lack of refinement and manners, illustrating that true upper-class gentility cannot be acquired simply by having enough money. Mr. Elton’s attempt to rise socially himself by wedding Augusta is properly punished by his ending up married to a woman whose attitudes and behavior will always display ignorance of all but the material trappings of class. In contrast to the Eltons are the Bateses, who were born into upper-class gentility but who have since lost all their wealth. Truly high-class neighbors such as Mr. Knightley and the Woodhouses still associate with the Bateses, while trying to relieve their poverty with frequent gifts of goods and services. Mr. Knightley, the model of gentlemanly behavior, urges Emma to become friends with the Bateses’ niece, Jane Fairfax, rather than with Harriet, because Jane, while equally needy, still belongs to a higher class because of her birth, accomplishments, and refinement. Mr. Knightley also castigates Emma for insulting Miss Bates at the Box Hill picnic, because as one who was born and bred into the upper class but has lives in poverty, Miss Bates deserves Emma’s sympathy and kindness. Mr. Knightley also points out that as the highest-ranking young woman in the neighborhood, Emma has the obligation to set an example of courtesy and good manners, which she has lamentably failed to do. In Frank Churchill we see a young man who was adopted into wealth and educated with upper-class manners. Yet the family who adopted him, while rich and proud, has “no fair pretense of family or blood” but is an “upstart.” Therefore, while Frank can act like convincingly like a gentleman, he still has some character flaws that betray his inferiority to someone like Mr. Knightley. Although he has the good taste to fall in love with the refined Jane Fairfax, his willingness to form a secret engagement and deceive those around him show that Frank lacks the honesty and integrity of an ideal gentleman.
Throughout the novel, Emma learns, through her mistakes and through the tutelage of Mr. Knightley, the obligations of her class. Initially, she looks down upon everyone in a lower economic sphere than herself and respects those who pretend to gentility. She denigrates Robert Martin, for example, as a degrading inferior whose wife she could never visit, but then she finds him to be a respectable man worthy of being Harriet’s husband. She considers Mr. Elton “quite the gentleman” and credits him with elegance of mind, but later she learns he is petty, self-serving, and shallow. At first, Emma feels she should not accept the Coles’ invitation to dinner because “they ought to be taught that it was not for them to arrange the terms on which the superior families would visit them.” But then, as they afford her all the courtesy and consequence she could wish, she finds that she enjoys the occasion and their company. She ridicules Miss Bates and Jane Fairfax but at last realizes they are kind and discerning friends. She criticizes Mr. Knightley for not sufficiently displaying his rank by riding around in his carriage and by associating with farmers like Robert Martin, but she finally learns that he has such true gentility of mind and heart that he does not need to flaunt his superiority with surface pretensions. What Austen is telling us in Emma about social class is that gradations in rank are necessary for the orderly workings of society, and that happiness and peace result from recognizing and accepting class boundaries. However, she also shows that there is more to gentility than simply money, birth, and connections. True gentility of mind includes respect and kindness for others no matter what their station, personal moral integrity, and wise judgment. At the novel’s close, readers rejoice that Emma has learned this lesson well enough to be the proper companion of the estimable Mr. Knightley, and that she is well on her way to developing the superior character necessary to her high position on the social ladder. Sally Palmer
AUSTEN, JANEâ•… Pride and Prejudiceâ•… (1813)
Pride and Prejudice, originally entitled First Impressions, tells the story of the five Bennet sisters—Jane,
190â•…â•… Austen, Jane Elizabeth, Mary, Kitty, and Lydia—focusing mainly on the experiences of the two eldest as they learn to cope with the trials of society and the perils of love with few familial connections and little fortune. Jane and Elizabeth (Lizzy), as even their father admits, are less silly than most girls their age and, therefore, a great deal of the family’s hopes for the future hang on them. With no son to whom the family estate may pass upon Mr. Bennet’s death, it will be transferred to the girls’ ridiculous cousin, Mr. Collins. Therefore, at least one daughter must marry a rich man so that she will be able to support the family upon their father’s death. The novel follows the lives and affections of Jane and Lizzy as they navigate both London and country society, fall in love with men of great wealth, and overcome the impediments associated with status and family in order to achieve happy marriages. Jane’s beau, Charles Bingley, must learn to grow up and shake off the control of his friend and sisters in order to pursue his feelings for the eldest Bennet daughter. However, the obstacles facing Lizzy and Fitzwilliam Darcy—his pride and her prejudice, or her pride and his prejudice—are much greater and more difficult to overcome, as first impressions often are. Laura L. Guggenheim
Gender in Pride and Prejudice
In Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, Jane Bennet, the eldest daughter of a country gentleman, epitomizes the feminine ideal; she possesses all of the qualities early 19th-century English citizens believed a woman should. She is beautiful, mild, obedient, sensible though capable of deep feeling, slow to judge others, always socially amenable, and, most important, virtuous. Each of her younger sisters—Elizabeth, Mary, Kitty, and Lydia—and every significant female character in the novel strays further and further from this ideal, and the extent to which each deviates parallels the extent to which each achieves marital happiness. Mary is virtuous and obedient, but she is certainly not sensible or well-mannered. Her social gaffes embarrass her sisters more than once, and she never marries. Kitty and Lydia are described as “silly” and “vacant” and have no talents beyond their ability to discuss the latest fashions and admire redcoated militia officers.
Although Elizabeth and Jane’s influence improves Kitty’s disposition, she is still unmarried when the novel ends. Lydia, however, distinguishes herself by her total lack of virtue, a deficiency she publicizes when she elopes and nearly ruins her family’s reputation. Lizzy, the second daughter and heroine of the novel, embodies most of the feminine qualities Jane possesses, though she lacks her sister’s mildness and can be quick to criticize others. Once she receives the letter from Mr. Darcy that details his prior relationship with George Wickham, she begins to recognize her flaws, and, upon correcting them, she is able to make a very happy and prosperous match. None of her three younger sisters nor her mother has learned to fully perform their feminine role, and therefore, happy marriages are impossible for them. Mrs. Bennet makes herself ridiculous in her attempts to be overly feminine; she fancies herself a victim of others’ cruelty, constantly complaining that no one regards her “nerves.” She has little respect for decorum and embarrasses her eldest daughters with her public prattling about private matters. Her marriage, built on physical attraction, is now a loveless union. Charlotte Lucas, Lizzy’s best friend, also makes a loveless, though sensible, match when she marries Mr. Collins. Charlotte is almost an old maid, rather plain, poor, and eminently practical. After Lizzy refuses Mr. Collins’s marriage proposal, Charlotte schemes to catch the rejected rector for herself, an activity highly discouraged among virtuous women, because, as she says, marriage is the best way to guarantee her future security. Cunning women, however, are not virtuous women, as Mr. Darcy meaningfully reminds Miss Bingley, a woman who schemes so often and so overtly that she is unable to secure a marriage of any kind. She is, perhaps, the least feminine of all the female characters because of her deviousness. Male characters’ ability to perform their masculine gender role parallels their wives’ capacity to perform the feminine. Charles Bingley is an almost-perfect specimen of early 19th-century masculinity. He is charming, well-mannered, wealthy, sensible, and good-humored. It is no wonder that he and Jane fall in love; they each embody all of the gender characteristics thought appropriate to members of their sex. Fitzwilliam Darcy, on the other
Pride and Prejudiceâ•…â•… 191 hand, begins the novel lacking nearly all of these qualities. His behavior at the ball where Jane and Bingley become acquainted marks him as haughty and proud. Once Elizabeth accuses him of failing to behave in a “gentleman-like manner,” he realizes how pride has contaminated his disposition, and he is able to reflect on the ways in which he has failed to behave as a gentleman should. These reflections lead to his eventual transformation, and when he renews his marriage proposal to her in an honest, unaffected, and gentleman-like manner, his alteration is complete. George Wickham undergoes no such transformation. In fact, he seems, at first, to possess every desirable masculine quality until Darcy reveals his real, deceitful, character. Wickham’s duplicity fools everyone initially, but his inability to fulfill his proper role matches his wife’s deficiencies. Mr. Collins is as silly as his wife is rational, and his obsequiousness to all those of higher social standing than he makes him a toady—hardly masculine. Finally, Mr. Bennet, for all his wit, makes sport at his wife’s expense, fails to plan ahead for his family, and participates in the near-destruction of its reputation by refusing to discipline his unruly daughters. His failure to perform these masculine duties exposes him as incapable of performing his gender role, and though he is a father with responsibilities, he never really acts like one. Laura L. Guggenheim
Love in Pride and Prejudice
In Pride and Prejudice, whenever a character mentions love or marriage, concerns about money and security can never be far behind. Happiness is often a mere afterthought. This dynamic is immediately set up by the first, and most famous, sentence in the book: “It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.” Confirmation that an eligible bachelor with 5,000 pounds a year is moving into the neighborhood prompts Mrs. Bennet, without knowledge of this stranger’s disposition or character, to hope that he will marry one of her five daughters. Marriage and financial security, not necessarily happiness or love, must be a woman’s main goals when she has little fortune herself. Happiness and love are
to be desired in marriage, certainly, but they cannot come before financial independence. Such a rule is made clear when Elizabeth Bennet’s Aunt Gardiner hears of her niece’s growing attachment to the handsome, but penniless, George Wickham. She cautions Lizzy, “Do not involve yourself, or endeavor to involve him in an affection which the want of fortune would make so very imprudent.” Mrs. Gardiner knows that Lizzy is too sensible to pursue the attachment because their marriage would be catastrophically impoverished. Likewise, perhaps the most practical character in the novel, Charlotte Lucas, Lizzy’s friend, understands the value of a marriage that grants the lady financial stability, even over personal happiness. She recommends that Jane “secure” Charles Bingley’s affections by being forward with her own feelings, though those feelings have not yet fully developed, and Charlotte takes her own advice when she secures Mr. Collins’s affections before she can develop any real feeling for him. “Happiness in marriage,” she insists, “is entirely a matter of chance.” This is because one does not marry whom one loves, or for happiness, but for security, and it is precisely this kind of marriage that Charlotte obtains when she consents to marry Lizzy’s vapid but financially independent cousin. Once they are married, Lizzy visits her friend, and though she admits that the match was a prudent one for Charlotte, she hates to leave her friend alone again. “Poor Charlotte!” she thinks. “But she had chosen it with her eyes open.╯.╯.╯. Her home and her housekeeping, her parish and her poultry, and all their dependent concerns, had not yet lost their charms.” In the end, contentment, not love, may be all a woman with little fortune can reasonably wish for in marriage. Even the wealthy cannot escape the fact that money and status are more intimately connected to marriage than love. When Fitzwilliam Darcy begins to fall in love with Elizabeth, very much against his will, “He really believed, that were it not for the inferiority of her connections, he should be in some danger.” Her low family status and lack of fortune prevent him, at first, from seriously considering her as a marriage partner. These obstacles, in addition, threaten the love growing between Jane and Bingley,
192â•…â•… Austen, Jane whose friends and family very much abhor a connection with the Bennet family. On the other hand, Austen seems to argue for the importance of a certain kind of love over even money. This kind of love, it seems, is visible to discerning observers. When Jane doubts the nature of Bingley’s regard for her, Lizzy insists, “No one who has ever seen [them] together, can doubt his affection.” Further, when Lady Catherine de Bourgh mentions her daughter, Anne, long expected to marry Mr. Darcy, in his presence, Elizabeth can discern no “symptom of love” in him. Finally, Mr. and Mrs. Gardiner, when they direct their observation toward Lizzy and Darcy, see that Darcy does, indeed, love her, a fact that readers already know to be true. The sincere love that grows between Jane and Bingley, and between Lizzy and Darcy, cannot be hidden or suppressed, and it endures regardless of money, family, or other obstacles. When Bingley finally proposes to Jane, “Elizabeth really believed all his expectations of felicity, to be rationally founded.” This love is reasonable, in part because it grows gradually, and it is built on sturdier foundations than lust or infatuation, which, incidentally, forms the basis of Mr. and Mrs. Bennet’s largely unhappy and loveless marriage. Unlike silly, romantic, or erotic attachments, the rational love between the two eldest Bennet sisters and their husbands will last because of all it has endured; and in it, love, marriage, and happiness can all be had in one. Laura L. Guggenheim
Pride in Pride and Prejudice
In Pride and Prejudice, every character who abhors pride in others possesses it themselves in spades. For example, Mrs. Bennet despises Mr. Darcy for his pride, and yet she is one of the proudest characters in the novel. On the other hand, those who have little pride do not seem to mind its existence in others. The modest Charlotte Lucas, in fact, allows that Mr. Darcy has the right to be proud, young, handsome, and rich as he is, and she goes on to marry the ridiculously proud Mr. Collins. Charlotte recognizes her husband’s flaws, but her pride cannot be wounded by the knowledge that she has a silly husband because she is not proud. Pride blinds characters to the true natures of others, leading to
misplaced trust or, more often, prejudice. It is only when their own pride is removed that characters are able to judge others rightly. While Mr. Darcy offends all of Hertfordshire society, “Amongst the most violent against him was Mrs. Bennet, whose dislike of his general behaviour was sharpened into particular resentment, by his having slighted one of her daughters.” In other words, Mrs. Bennet does not care for Mr. Darcy, but because he offends her pride by rejecting her daughter, her dislike grows into something stronger. In regard to the same incident, Elizabeth tells Charlotte, “I could easily forgive his pride, if he had not mortified mine” (original emphasis). In other words, Elizabeth’s feelings began much like her mother’s, and likewise, her prejudice against Darcy begins when he wounds her pride by refusing her as a dance partner. In this way does Darcy’s pride wound Elizabeth’s, provoking her prejudice against him and beginning the central conflict of the novel. After this, nothing Darcy does can persuade Elizabeth that her impression of him is wrong; his meaningful looks, compliments, attentions, even his professions of love—none of it helps her to see that her prejudice is misplaced. When she notices him noticing her, she assumes it is because he thinks there is something wrong with her, and she is unconcerned: “She liked him too little to care for his approbation.” When Wickham tells his story of Darcy’s pride, it is all too easy for Elizabeth to believe him because her pride has already been wounded and her prejudice against Darcy has been established. Furthermore, it is Darcy’s pride that prevents Elizabeth from considering his feelings in her rejection of his marriage proposal, and it is Elizabeth’s wounded pride that prevents her from seriously considering the proposal at all. Darcy begins by telling her how he tried and failed to overcome his love for her because of the social inferiority of her family. In his mind, he believes it to be a compliment that his feelings for her overwhelm his family pride, but such expressions only wound her further. Even Darcy’s subsequent letter to her is “all pride and insolence” and expresses nothing of sorrow or regret for his behavior toward Jane, initially increasing Elizabeth’s prejudice against him. It is not until Elizabeth seri-
Sense and Sensibilityâ•…â•… 193 ously considers Darcy’s accusations against Wickham and finds support for them within her own memory that she comes to understand how her own wounded pride has blinded her to Wickham’s deceitfulness: “↜‘How despicably have I acted!’ she cried. ‘I, who have prided myself on my discernment!’↜” Realizing her error convinces Elizabeth that her pride was misplaced, and she knows that if she can now believe Wickham guilty of duplicity, then she must also believe Darcy capable of sincerity. Moreover, Elizabeth’s accusation that Darcy has behaved in an “ungentlemanlike manner” helps him eventually to realize that his social pride is misplaced as well. When he finds Elizabeth at his home with the Gardiners, he asks her for an introduction to her aunt and uncle, members of the very family with whom the possibility of a connection so offended his pride before. After Lydia’s elopement with Wickham, Elizabeth’s own recent experiences with Darcy lead to her full realization of Darcy’s goodness and her own error. Similarly, Darcy learns to see Elizabeth as his equal, regardless of her low social connections and small fortune. With both of their proud natures humbled, Elizabeth can join Darcy in experiencing other, more pleasant feelings and can properly discern Darcy’s as well: “Such a change in a man of so much pride, excited not only astonishment but gratitude—for to love, ardent love, it must be attributed.” Laura L. Guggenheim
AUSTEN, JANEâ•… Sense and Sensibilityâ•… (1811)
Sense and Sensibility focuses on the lives and loves of the eldest Dashwood girls, Elinor and Marianne, two of three daughters born to a country gentleman’s second marriage. With only a witless half brother and selfish sister-in-law, John Dashwood and his wife, Fanny, to aid them financially after their father’s death, the Dashwood women drop into near social obscurity when they are obliged to move into a cottage owned by a relation of Mrs. Dashwood’s, Sir John Middleton. There, Elinor and Marianne must endure the somewhat vulgar but goodhearted gossiping of Mrs. Jennings, Lady Middleton’s mother. Such gossip is especially pain-
ful to Elinor since moving to Devonshire has taken her away from the man with whom she has begun to fall in love, Edward Ferrars, Fanny Dashwood’s eldest brother. On the other hand, the family’s relocation has brought Marianne nearer the first man with whom she will fall in love, John Willoughby, as well as the man she will eventually marry, Colonel Brandon, a friend of the Middletons. As Elinor grows more in love with Edward, and as Marianne experiences the pain of separation from and abandonment by Willoughby, the novel follows them to London and back again, as Elinor learns of Edward’s secret engagement to another woman and Marianne comes perilously close to death in her despair. In the end, both daughters learn to combine sense and sensibility, reason and romance, in order to achieve happiness in marriage and in life. Laura L. Guggenheim
Gender in Sense and Sensibility
In Jane Austen’s first published novel, the fortunes of female characters correspond to the extent to which they embody the early 19th-century feminine gender role. Marriage, it was believed, consisted of one representative of each gender, and masculine and feminine roles complemented each other. Elinor Dashwood, an exemplar of the feminine ideal, eventually marries Edward Ferrars, who, despite his shortcomings, is the happiest possible match for her. She is a sensible woman of good understanding, capable of great but governable emotion and incapable of manipulation. Edward’s character is marked by these same qualities, though he is rather less ambitious than his family would like. The love between Elinor and Edward has grown since their acquaintance was formed at Norland, and it is practical, founded on mutual respect and built slowly, over time. It did not begin as infatuation, and it was not “love at first sight,” but this love bespeaks the lovers’ ability to commit to each other for a lifetime rather than a season. Where Elinor’s disposition is marked by sense, her sister Marianne’s personality is characterized by extreme sensibility. Believing that there is nothing more virtuous and desirable than strong feeling, and, likewise, that such feeling can never be controlled, Marianne allows her sensibility to run away with
194â•…â•… Austen, Jane her, and she becomes infatuated with John Willoughby after a very romantic introduction. Novels of sensibility were popular a few decades prior to the publication of this novel, and Marianne represents a type of femininity that is no longer considered to be ideal. Even her features are more attractive than Elinor’s “regular” ones, as though Marianne’s immoderate beauty parallels her excessive feeling and Elinor’s reasonableness is mirrored by her more moderate beauty. Marianne’s relationship with Willoughby must end badly; their feelings develop too quickly, they are too rash, and he is a rake—the antithesis of proper masculinity. Only after her illness can she learn to be calm, to compose herself and control her emotion. She learns to desire further education, repents her selfishness, and expresses her wish that her behavior and conduct had been more like Elinor’s. Now that she embraces her feminine role, the attractions of an appropriately masculine gentleman like Colonel Brandon are not lost on her. They come to complement one another and marry, and, based on the optimism with which Austen speaks of their future happiness, we can assume that the union is harmonious. On the other hand, the colonel’s friends, Sir John and Lady Middleton, cannot make the same claim to propriety that he may. Sir John is boisterous and kindly, and his wife is elegant and polite, yet he is also a bit too intimate with guests, and she is actually indifferent to everyone but her children. He is far too warm in society, and she is much too cold. Neither performs the proper gender role, and they appear, consequently, incompatible and trapped in a mismatched marriage. Even further from the ideals of masculinity and femininity are John and Fanny Dashwood. John is controlled by his wife, coerced through her conniving selfishness into breaking the promise he made to his father on his deathbed. Fanny schemes, pursuing acquaintances who will further her social standing, ignoring inferior family members and manipulating others. Neither appears to be really happy: John must live with the suspicion of his own inefficacy, and Fanny nearly dies of disappointment when her brother Edward’s secret engagement to an unsuitable woman is revealed—and then her other brother Robert marries this very woman.
Perhaps furthest from performing their proper feminine role are the Misses Anne and Lucy Steele. Anne is unattractive in every way and developing into a spinster. She is socially inappropriate, verbally free with her acquaintances, and an embarrassment to her sister. Lucy is attractive and clever but also calculating and deceitful. She purposely hurts Elinor by forcing Elinor into her confidence with regard to her secret, and very improper, engagement to Edward. Lucy’s selfish intentions become clearer when she abandons Edward, once he has been made poor, and marries his brother Robert, newly rich. When one considers Lucy’s deficiencies, as well as the fact that she had once described her future husband as a coxcomb (a sentiment seconded by Elinor), we can conjecture that her marriage, though well-funded, will be neither a happy nor a loving one. In this novel, two people who are so unable to perform their appropriate gender roles are likewise unable to complement each other in the easy way these roles are meant to permit. Laura L. Guggenheim
Innocence and Experience in Sense and Sensibility
In Sense and Sensibility, Marianne, the middle Dashwood sister, and Elinor, the eldest, in many ways embody the qualities of innocence and experience, respectively. Innocence, in the context of this novel, really means the absence of a general knowledge of society, lacking an understanding of its rules as well as how to cope, both personally and publicly, with strong emotions like love, disappointment, and loss. Marianne, for example, is quick to form emotional attachments and sees no need to veil her feelings in public, no matter how improper they might seem. She believes, in fact, that true feelings run so deep that they cannot be disguised under any circumstances. To be “experienced,” on the other hand, means that one understands the ways of the world and accepts that adherence to social codes, at least to a certain degree, is necessary in order to maintain the good opinion of society and avoid shame, and, on another level, to protect oneself. Elinor has developed a certain level of experience, and she knows that to veil one’s emotions in public is to
Sense and Sensibilityâ•…â•… 195 protect oneself and one’s family from scrutiny and, perhaps, pain. As though hers were the yardstick by which others’ conduct might be measured, we are presented with Elinor’s example first. Though it is clear to all in the newly enlarged Norland household that Elinor and Edward Ferrars have formed a strong attachment, when Marianne presses Elinor for details, Elinor says, “I do not attempt to deny .╯.╯. that I think very highly of him—that I greatly esteem, that I like him.” Marianne is horrified. How could Elinor, who clearly loves Edward, speak of him in such bland terms? Elinor recognizes the significant obstacles that stand in the way of any romantic relationship with Edward—namely, his family and her lack of fortune. She is not unfeeling; she is discreet. Experience is not cold; it is only realistic. At least if Elinor keeps her feelings private, none may participate in her disappointment but herself. She protects herself, Edward, and her family with her prudence. When Marianne falls in love, however, her conduct is vastly different from Elinor’s. Believing that to hide her emotions is to admit some shame for them, trusting implicitly in Willoughby, and oblivious to the possibility of disappointment, Marianne has no scruples about putting herself and her feelings on display. The lovers’ conduct makes them the object of laughter, “but ridicule could not shame, and seemed hardly to provoke them.” Therefore, when Willoughby abandons Marianne, everyone participates in her loss, and on some level, the loss may be felt more deeply by her because she is so unpracticed at veiling her feelings and moving on. Discussions between Elinor and Colonel Brandon shed light on the happy aspects of a nature such as Marianne’s; she is all warmth, sincerity, and impulse because she does not reflect, and her own opinions have not yet given way to more general ones. There is something lovely about this innocence. However, Willoughby’s example reveals what can happen when such a nature is permitted to persist for too long: “The world had made him extravagant and vain; extravagance and vanity had made him cold-hearted and selfish.” Growing up can be sad, but one cannot remain a child forever,
and indulgence such as Willoughby has received makes for self-centered, unscrupulous adults. Marianne’s illness increases her sense of propriety, as though it finally enables her to see how her trials affect her loved ones as well as how unrestricted emotion can be deleterious to her own body and soul. When the family returns to Barton Cottage, Elinor “trace[s] the direction of a mind awakened to reasonable exertion” as Marianne attempts to accustom herself to the sight of objects associated with Willoughby. She notices the remnants of Marianne’s tears, shed discreetly rather than publicly. Finally, Marianne is able to admit that she has “nothing to regret—nothing but [her] own folly.” She is blameless, of course, for Willoughby’s behavior, but culpable for her own and the ways in which it has negatively affected her family. In the end, she forms a “second attachment,” a feeling she previously thought impossible, to Colonel Brandon, proving, once and for all, that she has acquired the level of experience necessary not only to survive but to be genuinely happy in the world. This happiness is possible because she sees the world now for what it is, and such a feeling permits her to feel gratitude, to recognize her mistakes, and to learn from them. Laura L. Guggenheim
Love in Sense and Sensibility
In Sense and Sensibility, Jane Austen champions rational rather than erotic love and insists that such love is absolutely necessary in order for a couple to achieve the most successful, and happiest, kind of marriage. Without this love, a couple can grow as cold and distant from each other as Sir John and Lady Middleton do, with nothing in common other than family. With it, a couple can hope to endure, to have their feelings grow stronger rather than stale as they grow old and as the more heated, obvious passion of youth passes. From the outset, Marianne Dashwood’s romantic sensibilities color her perceptions of love, both in her own life and in others’. She believes that only the young can aspire to feel or excite passion, that a woman of 27 years, for example, no longer has any hope or prospects of inciting another’s love. She does not believe in “second attachments,” presumably because real attachment can never be dupli-
196â•…â•… Baldwin, James cated, and she believes that the marks of true love are so obvious that they cannot be hidden or bidden. If a person can manage to disguise her feelings, as Lucy Steele does, then those feelings cannot be love. Likewise, real passion can never be counterfeited. That Marianne and Willoughby can fall in love so quickly, then, is only natural to her, and it corresponds that her feelings after her abandonment are so dramatic. She “would have thought herself very inexcusable had she been able to sleep at all the first night after parting from Willoughby. She would have been ashamed to look her family in the face the next morning, had she not risen from her bed in more need of repose than when she lay down in it.” The loss of such passion, after all, can be survived with no fewer fireworks than the passion first produced. Every emotion is pushed to its extreme, be it affection or anguish, hope or despair, and love is the chief emotion of all. On the other hand, Elinor Dashwood’s moderate and reasonable feelings for Edward grow slowly over time; they ripen and mature into love rather than proclaiming to have begun immediately. This slowness, to Marianne, marks a less worthy emotion, a feeling that is not really love at all because of its pace and because of what it appears to lack. To her, Edward’s eyes have no spirit, no fire; his reading lacks feeling, so he must not, therefore, be acquainted with such emotion; and his taste does not, in every point, coincide with Elinor’s. These deficits, Marianne believes, prevent the depth of feeling that is part and parcel of real passion. If Edward lacks the capacity for such emotional compatibility, then he surely is not capable of the burning ardor Marianne believes necessary. Finally, when Elinor speaks of Edward with moderate warmth rather than effusions of affection and fervent vows, Marianne calls her sister “cold-hearted” and threatens to leave the room! Elinor, however, understands that there is more to marriage than love, especially once Lucy Steele reveals her secret engagement to Edward. Commitment and honor, loyalty and honesty, are just as important in marriage. Edward must once have felt something like Marianne’s quick passion, or else he would not have engaged himself surreptitiously as a youth, but in the end, it is the rational love between Elinor and
Edward that survives all of Lucy’s selfishness, Marianne’s judgment, and the coldness of his own family. In observing the success and enduring passion of this love between Edward and her sister, and from the failure of her own methods and sentiments, Marianne realizes her folly. Erotic passion can be controlled, though it claims it cannot, and this is evident when Willoughby throws Marianne over for Miss Grey and her 50,000 pounds. The endurance of rational love is harder to break. Marianne learns the qualities that are just as important as passion, qualities that may appear to temper it but must exist alongside it in order for that passion to endure; these are the qualities of which Elinor has been aware from the beginning. Colonel Brandon’s possession of these qualities, in addition to his constant affection for her, finally wins Marianne over, to the great joy of everyone save Willoughby. Laura L. Guggenheim
BALDWIN, JAMESâ•… Go Tell It on the Mountainâ•… (1952)
James Baldwin’s first novel is notable because it marks a break with the tradition of “protest’ literature that had long dominated African-American writing. Instead of focusing on dramatic instances of racial oppression and African-American suffering, Baldwin (1924–87) focuses on the life of a family whose relationships are, of course, embedded in the racist history of the nation, but whose fates are also shaped by personality. Elegantly structured and lyrically written, the novel is set in Harlem on its protagonist John Grimes’s 14th birthday. The novel follows his day, but it also explores the lives of the family members—his father, Gabriel; his mother, Elizabeth; and his aunt, Florence—whose histories impact John’s life. John’s father is an evangelical preacher whose personal history of youthful dissolution, betrayal, and duplicity is masked by the piety he uses as a weapon against his wife and children. John’s loving mother has borne a child—John—whose father died, a suicide, before they could marry. Having saved her from disgrace by marrying her, Gabriel holds her sexual sin over her head throughout their marriage. Florence, who has learned the deep emotional price of attempting
Go Tell It on the Mountainâ•…â•… 197 to control a spouse, accepts the price and uses her knowledge of Gabriel’s own sexually sinful past to protect Elizabeth and the children. John’s struggle with his father’s angry disapproval of his interest in “the world” (education, reading, movies) is interlaced with his growing realization that he is homosexual, for John feels love and physical attraction for Elisha, a member of the church community. His story climaxes with his experience of religious conversion, which will inevitably free him from his father’s condemnation. Go Tell It on the Mountain develops a variety of themes: family, sex and sexuality, community are prominent, but also identity, religion, guilt, and race. Joe Skerrett, Jr.
Community in Go Tell It on the Mountain
While James Baldwin’s novel focuses on the birthday experiences of John Grimes, its 14-year-old protagonist, it also develops John’s place in interrelated racial, economic, and religious communities. A community is any group of people with shared social conditions, ideals, beliefs, and practices, especially, but not exclusively, those who live in proximity to one another. John shares with the members of his family unit a community of racial identity as an African American that has more than a personal or individual meaning, because his country has made race a marker of value. In Baldwin’s novel, John experiences his racial identity and community almost only as a negative value. The overwhelming aspect of it in his developing consciousness is its imposition and definition by the white society that surrounds and contains him. He does not celebrate his blackness in song, story, humor, or music. He is mostly unconscious of race within the family and neighborhood, but very conscious of race and color when he ventures out of Harlem to Central Park or downtown to a movie (in which, of course, whites are exclusively featured). John is similarly unselfconscious about his economic condition. His localized community is composed not only of African Americans but specifically of poor African Americans. John knows that his family is poor. His individual expectations about
birthday celebrations or gifts are not high. The shared struggle to maintain dignity and economic control is figured in the novel in the form of John’s sweeping of the carpets as part of his Saturday chores. But the most important community in which John exists is his religious community. He shares— or is expected to share—with the other members of the Church of the Fire Baptized (“the saints”) a faith, a worldview, and a set of rituals and practices. The church in which his father, Gabriel, is a deacon is an evangelical African-American Protestant sect, not identified in the novel as part of any larger denomination. Such institutions, often referred to as “holiness” churches, stressed a theology of personal salvation that could be witnessed in the church community through the expression of ecstatic prayer and spiritual possession. Stylistically distant from Catholic and Orthodox liturgical worship, but also clearly distant from the quietism of Quaker Protestantism, the “holiness” churches incorporate aspects of African religious ritual into their practice of a Protestant Christianity heavily influenced by Methodist “enthusiasm.” Thus, John’s experience in “The Threshing Floor” section of the novel, where he falls into a faint brought on by his anxiety over the community’s expectations that he will be a minister of God like his father, is both a conversion experience in the Protestant tradition and a version of African spiritual ecstasy. The worldview of the church community denies the importance of the public sphere. The church community is organized to foster and nurture the spiritual salvation of its members, who are encouraged to “walk holy” in their daily lives. This means that they should have no interest in the temptations and distractions of “the world” such as sexual pleasure, education, entertainment, and worldly ambition. The church’s beliefs and practices make the attainments denied to African Americans by white society and the compensatory alternatives to them equally irrelevant or inappropriate. In the novel, John witnesses the disciplining of Elisha and his girlfriend for appearing to the “saints” to be flirting with sexual desire. In the face of this puritanical obsession, he realizes that his own homosexual orientation will never be acceptable within the church
198â•…â•… Baldwin, James community, which is why he tells Elisha, whom he loves, to remember “whatever happens, that I was there.” Knowing intuitively that he will not remain within the community, it is still important to John to prove that he was the spiritual equal of his father in his experience of conversion, acceptable to God if not to Gabriel. Baldwin may well have known Paul and Percival Goodman’s Communitas: Means of Livelihood and Ways of Life (1947), a book published while he was working on the novel. The Goodmans’ book posits three types of social communities: one centered on materiality and consumption; one focused on art and creativity; and one that maximizes human liberty. Throughout his life’s work, Baldwin criticized American society for its materialism while presenting the protagonists of his fiction as artists attempting to bring into existence some new world order or community that would make people more spiritually free. John Grimes’s journey in Go Tell It on the Mountain is clearly the first of many. Joe Skerrett, Jr.
Family in Go Tell It on the Mountain
James Baldwin’s novel is richly inscribed with a variety of issues about family: family love, family social and sexual history, family psychological dynamics, and family secrets all are in play. The protagonist, John Grimes, is an African-American boy, just turning 14 on the day of the novel’s action, who is embedded in a nuclear family that consists of his mother, Elizabeth; his father, Gabriel; his brother Roy; and other younger siblings. But, as Baldwin makes clear, this nuclear family is embedded in an extended history of family relations that all come to bear on John’s life. For example, although John does not know it, Gabriel is only his stepfather. His biological father, Richard, died a suicide before he was born. Gabriel, influenced by his fundamentalist Christianity, rescued the pregnant Elizabeth from disgrace but holds her sexual sin and John’s illegitimacy over their heads, preferring and protecting his rebellious son Roy. Unaware of this history, John struggles to find ways to please the disapproving Gabriel, who is admired by the little religious community in which they move. On this, his 14th birthday, John is beginning to see the limitations of
following, as the community predicts he will, in his father’s footsteps into the church. Gabriel’s sister Florence tries to protect Elizabeth and John from the worst of Gabriel’s fundamentalist Puritanism. Florence knows him for what he really is. She knows that behind Gabriel’s professions of piety and his patriarchal posturing there is a history of human failure as a son, a husband, and a father. She witnessed Gabriel’s abandonment of their sick and dying mother in the South many years earlier, an abandonment that left her to bear the burden of caretaking alone. She also knows about Gabriel’s infidelity to Deborah, his first wife, and his adulterous liaison with Esther that produced an illegitimate child, Royal. She knows that Gabriel’s preferential love for the rebellious Roy is a guiltdriven effort to compensate for his failure to be a parent to Royal, now long since dead. Florence—who, like John’s father, Richard, is one of the few characters in the novel whose name does not have a biblical resonance—is a secular person, not one of the “saints” who attend Gabriel’s church. Like her name suggests, she is a natural force, not a religious one. Her insights into life are more psychological and intuitive than religious or dogmatic. She faces the realities of her life without the consolations of religion and has developed a tough exterior that enables her to stand up to the overbearing Gabriel, as Elizabeth, an altogether more gentle woman, can rarely do. Florence’s compassion for Elizabeth is in part a reflection of her memory of Deborah, the rape victim whose love Gabriel abused in his youth. Florence interferes in the family dynamics of Gabriel’s household in the hope of preventing Gabriel’s spiritual destruction of Elizabeth—in hope, that is, of preventing a repetition of the cycle of family devastation caused by Gabriel. Facing imminent death from cancer (which she conceals from the family), Florence now understands and regrets the way she destroyed her own marriage through an overemphasis on bourgeois proprieties that drove away her fun-loving husband, Frank. Of course, the novel does more than juxtapose Gabriel’s fundamentalism and Florence’s secularism. The dynamics of this family are driven by the secrets of their past lives. The exploration of Gabriel’s passionate affair with Esther and his failure to acknowl-
Go Tell It on the Mountainâ•…â•… 199 edge his son Royal humanizes him in the eyes of the reader. Gabriel’s effort to connect with Roy is clarified by our understanding of his secret, past failure as the father of a rebellious child. We also come to understand that Elizabeth is sustained in her strained marriage by her secret memory of the deep love she shared with Richard. Elizabeth’s tender affection for John reflects not Gabriel’s harsh view of the boy but, rather, Elizabeth’s idealized view of John as a reflection of Richard and his love for her. Joe Skerrett, Jr.
Sex and Sexuality in Go Tell It on the Mountain
Baldwin’s novel brings together issues of religion and issues of sexuality. The main character, John Grimes, is the illegitimate child of Elizabeth, who has married a Pentecostal preacher who thinks of John as the emblem of her sexual sin. John’s religious stepfather, however, has his own sexual sins, which he has never revealed to his wife. Unfaithful to his sexually unresponsive first wife, Deborah (herself a victim of rape), Gabriel, too, had an illegitimate child in his southern past, but he abandoned the boy and his mother, Esther, with whom he had had a volatile sexual relationship though he was a married man. Further, he denied Royal when Deborah, his childless wife, would have accepted the son of his mistress as her own. Gabriel’s sister, Florence, knows this history and threatens to reveal it if Gabriel does not treat John and Elizabeth more kindly. She has herself lost a husband to a secular puritanism of her own, an attitude that judged her fun-loving and careless husband for lacking drive and propriety. Outside the family circle, John witnesses how the church represses and stigmatizes the blossoming of sexuality among its younger members. When John’s buddy Elisha, an older teenager, is observed to be infatuated with a young girl in the congregation, they are hauled before the assembled “saints” and warned of the spiritual dangers of sexual expression. John is thus quite clear as to how the homosexuality that he realizes is his destiny will be received within the community. Baldwin is very cautious in asserting the specifics of John’s sexuality because of the rigid attitudes toward homosexuality that prevailed in the 1950s
when the novel was published. In a suppressed section of the original text—later published as the short story “The Outing”—John openly expresses his romantic attachment to another male. But careful reading of the novel will clearly demonstrate that John’s sexual imagination is homoerotic. He has a masturbatory fantasy about the boys at his school who engage in pissing contests in the toilet. His homosexuality is most forcefully manifested in his attraction to Elisha. John clearly has a crush on the slightly older boy: “John stared at Elisha all during the lesson, admiring the timbre of Elisha’s voice, much deeper and manlier than his own, admiring the leanness, and grace and strength and darkness of Elisha in his Sunday suit.” Further, later in the text, John wrestles with Elisha as they prepare the church space for the evening service, and John’s response to Elisha is one of sensual pleasure: “And so they turned, battling in the narrow room, and the odor of Elisha’s sweat was heavy in John’s nostrils. He saw the veins rise on Elisha’s forehead and his neck; his breath became jagged and harsh, and the grimace on his face became cruel; and John, watching these manifestations of his power, was filled with a wild delight.” Wrestling has often been used as a metaphor of spiritual struggle, as in the biblical narrative of Jacob wrestling with an angel, but it has also served as a symbol of suppressed homosexual feeling, as in D. H. Lawrence’s novel Women in Love. Here the wrestling scene serves both those purposes, as John struggles with the nature of his burgeoning sexuality as well as with his realization that the world of the church community will not satisfy him. Caught, then, between the demands of his religious community and the demands of his psychosexual nature, John experiences an anguished “flood of fury and tears” as he tries to decide what he must do. If, as the family and community assume, he will follow Gabriel into the church and ministry, how will he handle his forbidden sexuality? If he accedes to the demands of his mind and body and aligns himself with the profane world of desire, how is he to be saved? At the end of the novel, he accepts the conversion experience that marks his adulthood in the church, even as he knows he cannot make the church his refuge from the wider world forever. Joe Skerrett, Jr.
200â•…â•… Bambara, Toni Cade
BAMBARA, TONI CADEâ•… The Salt Eatersâ•… (1980)
Toni Cade Bambara’s novel The Salt Eaters is a story about possible rebirth in the individual life of the protagonist Velma Henry, the predominantly black town of Claybourne, and the planet as a whole. Velma’s attempted suicide, the specter of armed conflict in Claybourne, and the environmental and economic effect of a nuclear plant nearby place the novel on a precipice between disaster and transformation during what Toni Cade Bambara (1939–95) calls the “Last Quarter” of the 20th century. The Seven Sisters, a traveling collective of healers and artists made up of women of color of different backgrounds, journey toward Claybourne for an annual festival hosted by the holistic community school, Academy of the 7 Arts. A literal and cosmic storm, which seems to come out of nowhere, disrupts the planned festivities, throws the bus carrying the Seven Sisters off course, and redirects everyone to the Southwest Community Infirmary, where Minnie Ransom is calling on spiritual and ancestral guidance to help Velma return to the land of the living. The process of healing suggested through Bambara’s exploration of memory, violence, trauma, and love teaches readers that the “storms” of life always have a source. The literal storm in the novel is a response to the environmental degradation of the nuclear era. The eruption of the community is a result of gendered tensions in community institutions. The personal storms in lives of the community members are a result of unhealed trauma. The healer Minnie Ransom’s first question to Velma Henry is “Are you sure, sweetheart, that you want to be well?”—and her inquiry applies to the whole community. If the interconnected characters in this novel “want to be well,” they will have to learn how to take care of each other, their community, and this planet. Alexis Pauline Gumbs
Love in The Salt Eaters
Velma Henry’s nervous breakdown cannot be alleviated by a knight in shining armor. The profound disconnection that Velma feels from both her husband and her lover show that romantic heterosexual love cannot provide the self-esteem or wholeness necessary for complete healing. The love between Velma
and her husband, Obie, is threatened by the sexist violence that Velma has experienced. It becomes clear early in the novel that Obie, who does not even know about Velma’s attempted suicide until she is already in the infirmary, has to journey through several encounters with male figures who are struggling with the same gender roles that have been oppressive to Velma. Even though he moves toward her physically and spiritually throughout the novel, he will not be able to save her. The Seven Sisters, including Velma’s real sister, Palma, model another form of love: that between women who are chosen sisters, connected by their shared vision to transform the world. The Seven Sisters, representing different communities of color from around the world, bridge their different cultural heritages into a wealth of resources, which they practice by healing each other, loving each other, doing each other’s hair, creating art together and talking about what is important to them. This form of sisterly love is an important counterexample against the male-dominated establishment that Velma remembers as a painful feature of the Civil Rights movement. Velma’s sister Palma has a dream that her sister needs help, and her first priority when they arrive in the town of Claybourne is to find her, but Palma cannot save Velma either. Mother love is another resource that has helped to sustain Velma throughout her life. However, neither Velma’s birth mother nor her godmother Sophie can save her from herself. In fact, Sophie is herself traumatized by Velma’s suicide attempt, as it reminds her of the police violence her son experienced, and she has to leave the room early in the novel. Velma and the readers learn that it is only Velma’s love for herself that will allow her to get off the stool in the infirmary at the last moment of the novel. Self-love is the power that makes romantic, sisterly, and community-wide love possible. Bambara reminds the community that only a deep love for self, enacted through community accountability, will allow healing to occur. Community is the context for a sustainable transformative love during the “Last Quarter” of the century, when everything is at stake. Alexis Pauline Gumbs
The Salt Eatersâ•…â•… 201
Memory in The Salt Eaters
Toni Cade Bambara uses memory in The Salt Eaters to create a cosmic sense of time. The events of one day are able to reflect on the entire second half of the 20th century and more. Traumatic memories play a significant role in the novel. Sophie Heywood experiences traumatic memory of police violence against her son. While Velma is on the verge of a nervous breakdown, her husband, Obie, insists that she is becoming bitter and losing a grasp on her mental health because she refuses to let go of the traumatic memories she has of being taken advantage of and belittled within the sexism of the civil rights and black liberation struggles. While Velma thinks back on the path that led her to attempt suicide, she has flashes of an ancient set of people called the “mud mothers” who continue to break into her consciousness, demanding healing. The timeless mud mothers place Velma’s life into a larger spiritual context by referencing the maternal energy of creating the earth itself. Minnie Ransom, the healer who attempts to guide Velma through her recovery, draws on the help of a spiritual guide, “Old Wife,” who mentors her across the divide between the living and the dead. Old Wife’s references to “dancing in the mud” suggest that she is also one of the mud mothers who appear in flashes of consciousness throughout the novel. Bambara’s spiritual time scale fills the single day of the novel with the impact of centuries. Bambara also opens up the characters’ memories in order to develop their personalities and tell the reader about the tense times they are navigating. The memory of the Civil Rights movement is key to the women and men seeking to enact a creative and educational black liberation struggle in the late 1970s, but since they have not processed the violence that people in the movement experienced from outside forces like the police and from one another within the sometimes oppressive power dynamics of the movement itself, traumatic memories can resurface at any moment and erupt in the lives of the community members. Bambara uses the legend of the salt eaters to contextualize the entire novel. According to the story, passed down through word of mouth, once the enslaved African people in the Americas ate salt,
they forgot the ability they had to fly back to Africa. In this way, The Salt Eaters is as much about forgetting as it is about memory. Toni Cade Bambara uses memory in the novel to explore how a group of people traumatized by their struggle can reconnect to ancestral resources and play their role in the planet’s necessary healing by healing each other and themselves. Alexis Pauline Gumbs
Violence in The Salt Eaters
In the opening scene of The Salt Eaters, Velma Henry is on a stool in the Southwest Community Infirmary, after attempting suicide. From the outset, Toni Bambara contextualizes Velma’s self-inflicted harm within a longer story. As Velma asks herself how she ended up on this recovery stool, the reader journeys backward into her memory to learn that her violence against herself is a delayed result of gendered violence within the black movement for liberation. While under Minnie Ransom’s care at the infirmary, Velma has a violent and vivid memory of sitting in a meeting where the voices and work of women in the black liberation movement are silenced by the charismatic power posturing of Jay Patterson, a so-called community leader. During this meeting, Velma is literally bleeding, because her menstrual cycle has started. Velma remembers hitchhiking and walking through the rain, her body sore and bruised in order to salvage an event that Jay Patterson is able to enjoy and take credit for without doing any work. The sexism in the Civil Rights and black liberation movements meant that while women were doing the majority of the physical and strategic labor, men were making the speeches, projecting their visions and garnering “fame” in the movement. Through Velma’s experience, Bambara describes the impact of this ongoing sexism as violence. The weight and bitterness of these memories of the exploited labor of women by their male comrades stays in Velma’s body. They tear apart her mental health, to the point that she eventually tries to take her own life. While Velma relives these painful memories, her godmother, Sophie Heywood, is so distressed that she leaves the room during Velma’s healing process.
202â•…â•… Behn, Aphra Watching Velma, Sophie is overcome by a traumatic image of the police brutality that her son Smitty experienced during a civil rights protest. Juxtaposing police brutality with sexism, Bambara makes the point that the violence of sexism within the Civil Rights and black liberation movements was as harmful as the violence of racist police officers who tried to suppress the movement from outside. Hurting and taking advantage of women in the struggle for justice hurt the whole movement and cost people their lives. The movement as a whole takes a toll on the lives of black people when they are not able to heal from the traumatic, oppressive violence they have experienced over the years as punishment for speaking out. Unlike her sister Palma, Velma never gave herself any artistic or social escape from the movement for social justice. She was working for the movement all day every day. Through her refusal to take care of herself, her urge to do only what seemed most productive and necessary for the movement, she threatened a crucial movement resource: her own life and well-being. Similarly, in the novel, the earth itself is suffering because human beings insist on doing what seems most profitable without taking into consideration the connection between the planet’s well-being and the lives of human beings. The bus driver Fred Holt reflects on the decreasing economic choices for workers in the area who see the nuclear power plant as their best option, despite the fact that the exposure to radiation threatens their physical health. Holt’s friends, other workingclass black men, are dying as a result of radiation exposure. Environmental racism is heaped on top of plans of redevelopers to push black communities out of cities. Holt ruminates on the predictability of economic violence in the so-called urban renewal process while driving past a recently demolished public housing unit: “Redevelopment. Progress. The master plan. Cut back on services, declare blight, run back from the suburbs and take over,” he thinks. A push for so-called progress in terms of both the black liberation struggle and capitalist economics results in violence against the women in the black liberation movement and against
working-class communities more generally. The novel points out that this violence erupts in conflict, represented by the storm taking over Claybourne, which impacts everyone, even though the most oppressed people feel it first. Bambara offers a depiction of violence that moves from the individual self-inflicted harm of attempted suicide to the structural violence of racism, sexism, and capitalism, demonstrating that when a society chooses selfish profits over the well-being of the group, it is suicidal. Alexis Pauline Gumbs
BEHN, APHRAâ•… Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slaveâ•… (1688)
Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slave is a short novella by Aphra Behn (1640–89). It tells the story of an African prince, Oroonoko, who is separated from his lover, Imoinda, and is then captured and forced into slavery by an English sea captain. He is eventually reunited with Imoinda in Surinam (today called Suriname), an English colony based on sugarcane plantations and located on the northeast coast of South America. Oroonoko contains elements of three popular forms of Restoration literature: the New World travel story, the courtly romance, and the heroic tragedy. The novella’s author, an English novelist, poet, and dramatist, may have visited Surinam as a young woman. Although Behn’s biographers now agree that her story was probably based on her actual experiences in the New World, there is no historical record testifying to the existence of Oroonoko and Imoinda. Behn is often hailed as being one of the first English novelists. Oroonoko was written at a time when the narrative technique and the feature of the fictionalized author were underdeveloped. Characterized by the omnipresence of its female narrator, Oroonoko is an early prose narrative in which the narrator acts as the tale’s interpreter. In addition to its innovative narrative strategy, Behn’s novella is also one of the first pieces of English writing to present a hero who is black and enslaved, thereby contributing to the image of the “noble savage” in literature. Victoria E. Price
Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slaveâ•…â•… 203
Gender in Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slave
As a woman who exists in a patriarchal culture that is hostile to female creativity, the narrator of Aphra Behn’s Oroonoko is conscious of her apparent gender transgression in putting pen to paper. Writing was typically viewed in 17th-century England as a masculine activity; thus, in foregrounding the female voice, the novella can be seen to undermine the accepted gender codes of the day. The narrator, an English settler at the slave colony of Surinam, continually offers apologies for the comparative weakness of her “female pen.” This is especially apparent in the closing lines of the novel, where she asserts that Oroonoko, the black prince who is captured and sold by a slave trader, is “worthy of a better Fate, and a more sublime Wit than mine to write his Praise.” Such assumptions of modesty are designed to distance the narrator from any perception of a female transgression. A further narrative technique that she employs as a means of legitimating her work can be found in the clear moral motivation the narrator identifies for her act of writing: She wants to ensure that Oroonoko’s “Glorious Name” survives “all ages.” Although the narrator’s character does not seem developed (she does not have a name, and the reader learns little about her appearance, her family, or her life in the colony), it is nevertheless a recognizably female narrative authority that is prioritized by the text. The novella is written in a mixture of first and third person as the narrator relates events in Africa. Claiming to record the adventures of an actual, as opposed to an imaginary, hero and setting herself up as an eyewitness to events in Surinam, she attempts to overcome gender bias concerning women’s writing. The narrator repeatedly highlights female spectatorship so that even at the scene of Oroonoko’s death, she informs her reader that, though she was absent, her mother and sister were present. In this way, the narrator places an emphasis on women’s powers of observation and invokes her own experience in order to grant the female voice authority. The novella’s concern with gender is further explored through the narrator’s relationship with Oroonoko. This is a relationship that initially appears to be based on traditional gender roles, in that Oroonoko heroically saves the narrator’s life in the text on several different occasions. And when-
ever his own life is in danger (two times), the narrator poignantly explains her absence and inability to save Oroonoko from physical harm in terms of her female gender. For example, when Oroonoko is captured after having led an uprising of slaves into the woods, the narrator asserts that she was not present when he was punished by whipping because “We were possess’d with extream Fear” and “This apprehension made all the Females of us fly down the Rover, to be secur’d.” The only actions open to her in the face of danger are flight and speech, indicative of both her powerlessness as a woman and her struggle with the constraints of the gender hierarchy. However, Oroonoko’s exploration of the gender dynamic between the narrator and Oroonoko is much more complicated than this. While they do occupy traditional roles, their relationship is not simply male-female, active-passive: Because she is white, she also occupies a position superior to Oroonoko’s in the social hierarchy. Indeed, Oroonoko is the story of the African prince from the point of view of the middle-class narrator colonial mistress: The black male protagonist can only speak through the white female narrator. The narrator, then, can be seen to enjoy a position of power in Surinam that does not correspond to the gender conventions of early modern England. This is reinforced by the way in which she claims intimate knowledge of Oroonoko. The verb to know is suggestive of sexual domination, and so the white colonial mistress can be seen to assert a sexual domination over Oroonoko and thereby to claim a power traditionally assumed to be male. Similarly, when Oroonoko is castrated during his death scene, femininity becomes inscribed onto his body, and at the same time, the female narrator who recounts the dismemberment can be seen to usurp the position typically defined as masculine. Gender inversions are thus enacted throughout the text, with traditional gender codes becoming confused and unhinged. Ultimately, then, Oroonoko argues for the necessity of abandoning the notion of women’s (and men’s) gender identity as stable and easily understood. Victoria E. Price
Heroism in Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slave
As a virtuous African prince who is unjustly imprisoned and then executed by colonial profiteers, the
204â•…â•… Behn, Aphra titular character of Aphra Behn’s Oroonoko is an aristocratic hero trapped in a capitalist plot; at the same time, he is also the hero of a romance adventure. The novella describes the plight of Oroonoko when he is separated from Imoinda, the woman to whom he is betrothed and with whom his grandfather, the king of Coramantien, is also in love. The two are later reunited in the English slave colony of Surinam, Imoinda having been sold into slavery by the king and Oroonoko having been betrayed into slavery by an English sea captain. After he is transported to Surinam, Oroonoko unsuccessfully tries to disguise himself by begging the English gentleman who has purchased him, John Trefrey, to give him clothes more befitting a slave. Nevertheless, on arrival at Trefrey’s plantation, Oroonoko is unable to hide his nobility; he is greeted and worshipped by the other slaves, and his aristocratic magnanimity is physically visible in spite of the rags he wears. The subtitle of Behn’s novella (The Royal Slave) is a paradox which further alerts the reader to the fact that a change of place and outward circumstances cannot alter the fact of Oroonoko’s inherent honor and nobility. Because of his physical beauty, regal bearing, civilized manners, intellectual prowess, and ability to speak English, Oroonoko is treated with unusual distinction and respect by many of the English colonists. Notably, the reader never sees him engaged in slave labor. As befits an epic hero, much of his time is instead devoted to performing such gentlemanly activities as eel grabbing, tiger hunting, and saving the narrator’s life. Oroonoko can additionally be seen to take on many of the aristocratic values of Restoration England: gentility, physical prowess, and adherence to a strict code of love and honor. The narrator repeatedly speaks of his greatness of soul and proclaims him to be an expert captain. In the account of Oroonoko and Imoinda’s courtship in Africa, it is also made clear that the prince practices the old social forms of romance, where true love is preeminently valued and held up for veneration. Oroonoko’s court in Coramantien is a world in which noble virtues such as loyalty and honesty are heavily prized. Vows are especially important to Oroonoko; the reader is told he has never violated a word in his life. This is in complete contrast to the
sea captain who twice deceives Oroonoko: first by luring the prince onto his ship so that he can seize Oroonoko and his men, and later by breaking his promise to release the captured when they reach land if Oroonoko will agree to eat. Similarly, after leading an unsuccessful slave revolt, Oroonoko is betrayed and enslaved by the deputy governor of the Surinam plantation, William Byam, who appeals to his honor and drafts an article of peace before having the slave whipped and pepper rubbed into his wounds. The idea of heroism is most forcefully conveyed by Behn in the scene of Oroonoko’s brutal death. The narrator recalls how, during his execution, Oroonoko stoicly endures the pain of his dismemberment while smoking a pipe. Similarly, Imoinda’s death is romanticized earlier in the narrative. Concerned that his and Imoinda’s unborn child will be born into slavery and preferring his family to die rather than live as slaves, Oroonoko escapes to the jungle, where he kills the pregnant Imoinda by his own hand. Imoinda bravely and serenely accepts her fate, making clear her preference for death over living without her husband. Her murder is also a plot device engineered to facilitate the tale’s proper conclusion: the tragic downfall of the novella’s hero. While Oroonoko undoubtedly presents the prince as the hero of the story, Behn portrays Oroonoko’s heroism in a striking fashion. For Behn, the institution of slavery itself is not something that Oroonoko is fighting. Rather, he is protesting the slavery specifically of him and his wife. Indeed, it is made clear that in his past Oroonoko was a slave trader in Coramantien. Nevertheless, the novella is written in such a way as to invite the reader to juxtapose the prince against the Europeans—figures in whom the aristocratic values that Oroonoko symbolizes (honesty and loyalty) are sorely absent. The result of this juxtaposing is that Oroonoko firmly emerges as the tragic hero of the tale—one who functions ultimately to challenge Western notions of superiority prevalent in the culture of Behn’s time. Victoria E. Price
Race in Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slave
Presenting the story of an African prince who is tricked into slavery, Aphra Behn’s Oroonoko is intri-
Oroonoko; or, The Royal Slaveâ•…â•… 205 cately concerned with issues of race. The tale is told by an eyewitness narrator who both collaborates with and criticizes the colonial enterprise within which the titular hero finds himself trapped. To this end, the novella replicates and contests early modern notions of the racial “other.” The narrative opens with a description of Surinam (today Suriname), the English colony in the West Indies where the story is set. Behn’s narrator exhibits a fascination with the exotic objects of Surinam, portraying the Americas as rich in land and natural resources. The narrator’s experiences of meeting the indigenous peoples are intermixed with the main plot of the love story of Oroonoko and his betrothed, Imoinda. The natives of Surinam are depicted as innocent and free from sin, but also as racial “others,” primitive and in tune with nature. Similarly, when recounting what she has learned from Oroonoko about his home in Coramantien, the narrator portrays Africa as an exotic landscape where the inhabitants engage in unfamiliar cultural practices: They practice polygamy and seem to be continually fighting in order to win slaves in battle. In short, the novella appears to uphold English Renaissance and Restoration stereotypes about the black man—that he is strange, unfamiliar, inferior, savage, brutal, exotic, sexual, heathen, an ethnic “other.” And yet, at times the boundaries between the non-European and the European, between the black man and the white man, become blurred. For example, the narrator makes clear that what most distinguishes Oroonoko from the other slaves on the plantation is the European characteristics that he is seen to possess. With his straight hair and Roman nose, Oroonoko’s physical makeup accords in many ways to a Eurocentric vision of beauty. He is learned in European lore, having received the elements of a courtly education from a French tutor at his grandfather’s court. He also adopts many of the European aristocratic values that define courtly life in Restoration England. Oroonoko is presented by Behn as a hero of the European sort. In this way, Oroonoko can be seen to show a resistance to facile racial categories: Oroonoko is a heroic prince, but at the same time he is a black slave.
At other moments, however, Behn’s narrative can be seen to perpetuate the very categories that it elsewhere seems to reject. For example, when the narrator describes Oroonoko’s body and physical beauty, she commodifies the African prince as an exotic, luxurious, and appealing example of colonial bounty. She pauses over each feature of his body so that Oroonoko’s person comes to emblematize the alluring potential of colonial exploration. What Behn makes clear is that there are two competing models of value mapped onto Oroonoko’s body: one of commercial value, the other of political and moral value. Indeed, Oroonoko’s graceful kingship and natural nobility is continually emphasized to the reader. This is particularly apparent when he tries to disguise himself on entering the slave colony: In spite of his being dressed in rags, he instantly commands the respect of both his fellow slaves and his captors. The African prince encompasses the naturalized aristocratic values of authority such as moral virtue, mercy, equity, and gentility—qualities that appear to be absent in the colonial profiteers, who prize exchange value over virtue, commerce over justice, violence and barbarism over stability, and the rule of ignorant and uncivilized people over the rule of the educated and just. In this way, the narrative appears to reject contemporary racial stereotypes that at other moments it seems to replicate. It must nevertheless be noted that while Oroonoko’s greatness seems to challenge contemporary Western racist presumptions of superiority, it could be argued that his radical uniqueness and superiority could justify the continued use of slavery against Africans less great than he. Oroonoko strikingly constructs himself through English morality (choosing, for instance, to practice monogamy), which further sets him apart from the rest of his race. Indeed, while the novella protests the individual slavery of Oroonoko, it quite explicitly sanctions the trafficking in slaves. This is evident in the way that Oroonoko himself willingly trades slaves in Coramantien after winning them in war. The ideological contradictions concerning race and colonialism evident in Oroonoko suggest that for Behn the novel is as much about the nature of kingship as it is about
206â•…â•… Bellow, Saul the nature of race: Oroonoko is a prince, and he is a prince whether African or European. Victoria E. Price
BELLOW, SAULâ•… The Adventures of Augie Marchâ•… (1953)
When it was published in 1953, The Adventures of Augie March established Saul Bellow (1915–2005) as a leading American writer. Augie March announces in the first sentence that he is “an American, Chicago born .╯.╯. and will make the record in my own way.” Both a picaresque—an episodic tale that follows a young protagonist’s adventures—and a bildungsroman—a coming of age novel tracking the protagonist from youth to adulthood—the novel follows Augie’s life from the late 1920s to the years following World War II. After several odd jobs, Augie joins the neighborhood magnate William Einhorn, whose empire crumbles in the Great Depression, but who forms a reference point throughout the novel, not least because he gives Augie a set of fire-damaged classics to which he retreats occasionally. Augie then works for the Renlings, outdoor lifestyle purveyors, in nearby suburb Evanston, although that relationship fails when they insist on adopting him. Back in Chicago, Augie lives meagerly while his brother Simon marries into Charlotte Magnus’s wealthy family. Simon’s plans for Augie to follow suit are thwarted when Augie helps his neighbor Mimi obtain an abortion. Disowned by Simon, Augie joins Thea Fenchel, whom he met while with the Renlings, on a trip to Mexico. Their relationship dissolves after Augie helps a fellow expatriate, Stella, escape her lover. He then returns to Chicago, where the eccentric millionaire Robey employs him to research a grand project that never materializes. When World War II breaks out, Augie enlists in the Merchant Marine and locates Stella in New York, where the two marry. Torpedoed in the Atlantic, he drifts for days with an unbalanced fellow Chicagoan before their rescue. As the novel ends, Augie and Stella are living in Paris, where she pursues an acting career and he brokers shady deals in the disheveled atmosphere of postwar Europe. Richard Hancuff
Fate in The Adventures of Augie March
From Augie March’s early declaration that “a man’s character is his fate, says Heraclitus,” Saul Bellow’s novel explores the ground between the passivity of fate and the active creation of existentialism. Fate is predetermined, an external force acting upon the individual, although Heraclitus muddies the waters by suggesting that one’s fate is not external but, rather, stems from character of the individual. By the novel’s end, Augie has added his own twist to Heraclitus, arguing that “it is obvious that this fate, or what he settles for, is also his character.” More than inverting Heraclitus’s maxim, Augie defines fate as “what he settles for,” perhaps best understood as one’s choice in life. Augie has spent the better part of the novel resisting what others have tried to make of him, rejecting fates that are not his own, and in those actions he essentially denies the notion of fate as passivity; for Augie, fate must be worked for. After a conversation with William Einhorn, Augie states, “I never had accepted determination and wouldn’t become what other people wanted to make of me.” While Augie maintains an ease in his relations with others that leads the Renlings to want to adopt him—“there was something adoptional about me,” he explains—and Thea Fenchel to tell him, “You’re so happy when somebody begs you to oblige. You can’t stand up under flattery,” Augie does not see his behavior as his fate, either leaving or sabotaging his relationships when they become too constricting. The best summary of his attitude arrives as advice from his friend Manny Padilla, who is financing his education by stealing textbooks: “I don’t have larceny in my heart; I’m not a real crook. I’m not interested in it, so nobody can make a fate of it for me. It’s not my fate.” Like Manny, Augie embarks on his experiences as means to an end or as experiments, but not as integral components of his character. Late in the novel and deeply in love with Stella Chesney, Augie shares deep conversations with Mintouchian, a man Augie describes as “another of those persons who persistently arise before me with life counsels and illuminations.” Among the parables Mintouchian relates is a meditation on change and fate: “You make your peace with change. Another city, another woman, a different bed, but you’re the same
The Adventures of Augie Marchâ•…â•… 207 and so you must be flexible. You kiss the woman and you show how you love your fate, and you worship and adore the changes in life. You obey this law.” For Mintouchian, fate is simply what happens: It is the journey through life. In response, Augie tells him, “I have always tried to become what I am. But it’s a frightening thing .╯.╯. I suppose I better, anyway, give in and be it. I will never force the hand of fate to create a better Augie March.” Although Augie suggests he is giving in to fate and accepting determination, he speaks of trying to become what he is, which is a far more active view of fate. It does not accept that one’s fate comes upon one naturally; rather, it must be earned through struggle. In the end, Augie rejects a traditional view of fate as an end, seeing it instead as a process: “Other preoccupations are my fate, or what fills life and thought. Among them, preoccupation with Stella, so that what happens to her happens, by necessity, to me too.” Augie chooses his fate by choosing his preoccupations, although he may quibble with the amount of choice he had in his falling in love. Yet even his earlier actions, while interpreted by others, including his brother Simon, as aimless drifting, Augie interprets as hard work leading you to your fate: “[A]ll the while you thought you were going around idly terribly hard work was taking place. Hard, hard work, excavation and digging, mining, moling through tunnels, heaving, pushing .╯.╯. And none of this work is seen from the outside. It’s internally done.” Therefore, one’s fate is not only the end result of the pushing and heaving, but also the process itself; it is the becoming what one is, and the process of becoming is never finished. As Augie opines, “It’s only temporary. We’ll get out of it.” Richard Hancuff
Identity in The Adventures of Augie March
Augie March’s triumphant declaration that he is “an American, Chicago born .╯.╯. and will make the record in my own way” immediately announces to the reader the importance of identity, both personal and national, to the narrative. The point is further reinforced late in the novel, when Augie repeats this statement of origins while explaining how he has come to write the story of his life in a café in postwar Europe. Augie argues a connection between
nonconformity and being an American: that independence, the desire to “make the record in [his] own way,” is also exhibited in his personal life, as Augie fights against becoming what others expect. Throughout the text, Augie seems to have many admirers or acquaintances who want to thrust an identity onto him, and while he seems amenable enough to these plans at first, his mentor William Einhorn tells him, “You’ve got opposition in you. You don’t slide through everything. You just make it look so.” With that observation, Augie concludes that “I never had accepted determination and wouldn’t become what other people wanted to make of me.” Yet, while Augie realizes he does not want to be shaped by anyone else, it is not because he has a clear idea of his own identity: “I touched all sides, and nobody knew where I belonged. I had no good idea of that myself.” Augie’s lack of clear goals should not be taken as shiftlessness, which is exactly what his brother Simon mistakes it for, telling Augie, “since you won’t look out for your interests, I see I’m going to have to do it for you.” Simon creates one more role for Augie to play, but Augie is not seeking a role to play so much as he desires to understand his place in the universe: “I don’t want to be representative or exemplary or head of my generation or any model of manhood. All I want is something of my own, and bethink myself.” He seeks a connection with himself that he does not receive from any of the roles offered by others, either as employee, adopted son, or social-climbing husband, and in achieving that understanding, he seeks to locate himself among the received wisdom of the ages, frequently withdrawing to the classics of world literature that he has either received as damaged goods or come by dishonestly. These compromised modes of access are important, because they indicate not only the extent to which Augie has fought for this knowledge, but also the imperfection of the knowledge itself. As Augie notes, “I see I met those writers in the big book of utopias at a peculiar time. In those utopias, set up by hopes and art, how could you overlook the part of nature or be sure you could keep the feelings up?” In other words, Augie recognizes the delicate balance between theory and practice of life in achieving a satisfactory identity.
208â•…â•… Bellow, Saul While Augie’s personal journey is steeped in the classical tradition, he remains cognizant but suspicious of the larger national identity that promises a unifying community, a sameness of being. Of his short stint at the city college, he tells us that “the students were children of immigrants from all parts .╯.╯. put through the coarse sifters of curriculum, and also bringing wisdom of their own. They filled the factory-length corridors and giant classrooms with every human character and germ, to undergo consolidation and become, the idea was, American.” Augie’s eye remains not on the homogenized sum, though, but on the parts that comprise it, and the opposition in him celebrates the irreducible kernel of individuality: “I had opposed people in what they wanted to make of me, but now that I was in love with her I understood much better what I myself wanted.” Love crystallizes Augie’s sense of identity, because Augie recognizes his own desire. While the affair with Thea ends poorly, Augie from that point defines his future and feels confident in his choices, understanding his past as prelude to who he is. He reasons, “I want a place of my own .╯.╯. and I’d never loan myself again to any other guy’s scheme.” Having reached that point, he announces, “I have always tried to become what I am. But it’s a frightening thing. Because what if what I am by nature isn’t good enough?” The novel’s trajectory, then, arrives at an existentialist understanding of identity: One becomes who one is through an ongoing and difficult process, because rather than fit into anyone else’s preexisting schemes, Augie must determine his own way in the world. Richard Hancuff
Social Class in The Adventures of Augie March
Written during the great postwar expansion of the middle class, The Adventures of Augie March evinces a desire to remain outside class considerations, with the protagonist Augie March associating freely with heiresses, millionaires, waitresses, and thieves with little concern for climbing any sort of social ladder. However, as Augie wryly notes, “Everyone tries to create a world he can live in,╯.╯.╯. But the real world is already created.” Augie’s desire to escape class considerations do not negate those structures, and
while he rejects them as constructions, he remains subject to their power. Augie March’s family is poor, but the household’s matriarch, Grandma Lausch, remains “a snob about her Odessa luster and her servants and governesses,” which now exist only in her memories. Augie learns through her how to deceive the relief office, and she arranges jobs for Augie and his older brother Simon, with nearly all their income stretched to meet household expenses. While working for William Einhorn, a neighborhood real estate speculator and businessman with dreams of greater things, Augie experiences the subtle class distinction between being a trusted employee and an equal: “I wasn’t to think because we were intimately connected and because he liked me that I was going to get into the will╯.╯.╯.╯. It sometimes got my goat, he and Mrs. Einhorn made so sure I knew my place.” Interestingly, while annoyed, Augie is not resentful of this treatment. and Einhorn remains an adviser throughout the novel. Augie’s involvement with the Renlings, who run a suburban outdoor lifestyle store in the wealthy suburb of Evanston, broadens his horizons beyond the heavily immigrant and ethnic milieu of his youth. While agreeing to hire Augie, Mr. Renling tells him that “out there on the North Shore they don’t like Jews.╯.╯.╯. They like hardly anybody. Anyway, they’ll probably never know.” This introduction to exclusionary class distinction is reinforced later through Augie’s realization of—though not acceptance of—the fact that class behavior is closely tied to appearance, “because of the way I presented myself—due to Mrs. Renling—as if God had not left out a single one of His gifts, and I was advertising His liberality with me: good looks, excellent wardrobe, mighty fine manners, social ease .╯.╯. all in the freshest gold-leaf. And the trouble was that I had what you might call forged credentials.” Augie, obstinately concerned about being true to himself, knows how to pass across class lines, but it brings him discomfort. His brother Simon, on the other hand, has no such qualms, blithely announcing to Augie his plans to marry into the wealthy Magnus family and that Augie must follow suit, because he has “to have some family. I’ve been told they’re family-minded people. They wouldn’t understand or like it, the way
“An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge”â•…â•… 209 we are, and we have to make it look better.” Like Augie, Simon realizes that much of class distinction lies in presentation, and he does his research in order to move upward. For his part, Augie “had a fit of hate for the fat person he [Simon] was becoming” and develops a “dawning thought about rudeness as the measure of achievement.” That dawning thought pervades the novel’s presentation of class division, as many of Augie’s encounters with the rich and powerful result in revelations of their single-minded self-importance. While with the Renlings, Thea and Esther Fenchel, whom Augie refers to as the Fenchel heiresses, mistakenly think that Augie is Mrs. Renling’s gigolo, with Thea telling him matter-of-factly that her sister believes “that you service the lady that you’re with.” This assumption repeats itself when Thea and Augie travel to Mexico, where Thea plans to divorce her husband and train an eagle to hunt lizards, a mission that Augie belatedly comes to realize springs from her pampered lifestyle. As their relationship sours, Augie soon realizes that others see him as Thea’s kept man. Stella, an acquaintance who’s also in Mexico at the expense of a companion, tells him, “[I]t’s her house, isn’t it, and all the things are hers? What have you got of your own?” While Augie has his reasons for being with Thea, he understands the interpretive power of class expectations to those outside the relationship, suspecting in turn the truth of their perception and prompting him to declare, “All I want is something of my own, and bethink myself.” Tired of living off others and for others, Augie wants to escape the social connections that he feels constrict him. Augie’s desire is the text’s desire to negate social class and retreat into a republic of the spirit, a utopia built on the classic texts of Western civilization, but as his friend Clem Tambow concludes, “I wish you luck .╯.╯. but I don’t think it can ever happen. Richard Hancuff
BIERCE, AMBROSEâ•… “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge”â•… (1891)
“An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge,” the bestknown short story in Ambrose Bierce’s collection Tales of Soldiers and Civilians (1891), is a brief narra-
tive set in north Alabama during the American Civil War. Organized in three sections, the story dramatizes the military execution by federal troops of an Alabama planter, Peyton Farquhar. Part 1 shows the noncombatant Southerner being prepared for hanging on the bridge after having been caught trying to burn it down; part 2 flashes back to dramatize how a disguised Union spy gave Farquhar the idea of targeting this strategic railroad link; and part 3 follows the stages of an elaborate, delusional escape that Farquhar envisions during the instant he is dropping to his death. Though details in Farquhar’s mental flight seem implausible, Bierce’s closing sentence still delivers shock and surprise to first-time readers by reporting that Farquhar is dead, his neck broken and his corpse dangling over the creek. An example of naturalistic realism, Bierce’s narrative blends sharp external description with a vivid stream-of-consciousness monologue. The omniscient point of view focuses on Farquhar as the center of consciousness and protagonist while leaving the other characters, including his antagonists, flat and undeveloped. Though Bierce (1842–ca. 1914) himself was a Union veteran, his techniques here create empathy for Farquhar, a Southerner, thus enhancing the tragic effects of pity and fear as readers witness the dying man’s internal agonies and imaginative delusions. Concurrently, Bierce’s tone is detached, tinged with irony, sarcasm, and implicit cynicism. Contemporaries fittingly called the author “Bitter Bierce.” Roy Neil Graves
Death in “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge”
Set in northern Alabama during the American Civil War (1861–65), Ambrose Bierce’s short story “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” dramatizes the hanging of Peyton Farquhar, a Southern planter whom Union troops have captured while he was trying to burn down the militarily strategic bridge named in the title. Part 1 of the story shows Farquhar on the bridge being readied for execution. Part 2, a flashback, tells how a Union spy visited Farquhar at his plantation, 30 miles away, and lured him into trying to sabotage the bridge. Part 3, a stream-ofconsciousness section except for the last sentence,
210â•…â•… Bierce, Ambrose follows Farquhar’s inner life during the split second it takes for him to drop from the bridge to his death: “[A]s one already dead,” Farquhar imagines an elaborate escape in psychedelic detail—falling into the water below as the rope snaps, eluding gunfire, and struggling for a day through dense woods to return to his home and his wife. Despite strong hints that this “escape” is all a delusion, Bierce’s brutal closing sentence can still shock and surprise a first-time reader: “Peyton Farquhar was dead; his body, with a broken neck, swung gently from side to side beneath the timbers of the Owl Creek bridge.” Bierce’s story dramatizes a ceremonial military execution by imagining both the outward trappings and inward details of such a death, allowing a reader to envision the action while following the thoughts of the dying person. The story is an example of a realistic subgenre that uses omniscience (and never a first-person narrator) to show the last thoughts of a dying character; Bierce’s variant of this narrative mode reveals a unique, nearly posthumous view of inner life that even postdates the thought process itself: The narrator reports that after “[t]he intellectual part of his nature was already effaced,” Farquhar nonetheless still “knew that the rope had broken” and, in defiance of logic, could fabricate his own escape in protracted detail. As Bierce’s closing sentence shows, these postmortem “thoughts” prove delusional—cruel, self-preserving hallucinations induced by terminal stress. It is commonplace to imagine that at the split second of death, one’s whole life may rerun itself in the mind, but Bierce turns the dying man’s last, instantaneous vision into an imagined escape from death itself, forward-looking rather than retrospective. Farquhar’s dying brain even weaves the horrible pains of hanging into the tapestry of its last fantasy. Though Bierce himself had been a Union soldier, the story stays politically neutral even while encouraging sympathy for the dying Rebel. As the protagonist and focal figure, Farquhar is fully human and three-dimensional; by contrast, his antagonists stay undifferentiated and mechanical, mere agents of military protocol. Further, Farquhar is a young, handsome, respectable gentleman who is loyal, heroic, and victimized. These aspects tend to make
readers care for him and empathize with the agony of his final moments. Bierce laces his rendering of Farquhar’s death with verbal and situational ironies that verge on dark wit. Verbal irony occurs, for example, when Bierce’s sarcastic narrator calls the military code of justice “liberal” for not excluding “gentlemen” from hanging—and also when the understated title calls Farquhar’s execution “an occurrence,” implying something ordinary. Meanwhile, complex situational ironies convey Bierce’s own cynical view of things: Military men act with punctilious decorum while committing a brutal act, executing a man who believes he is escaping death even during his dying moment. Such ironies are compelling enough that a first-time reader may believe Farquhar’s delusion to be the real thing. Farquhar is a symbol of the planter class, and his futile, self-deluding doom mirrors the larger outcomes of the war, which the South lost. Viewed somewhat differently, his death personalizes the hideous fraternal slaughter that killed thousands of valiant men on both sides, North and South. Layered under the veneer of military ceremony in the story lies the internal violence of a brutal death that only fiction can allow an outside witness to experience. As naturalistic realism, Bierce’s story shows no glory in such a death and registers no mitigating hope that an afterlife might ease or justify such terminal suffering. Bierce’s narrator resists moralizing but does remark that, according to military etiquette, death always evokes “silence and fixity,” quiet respect, even when one side inflicts it ritualistically on the other. Overall, the story treats death in war as brutally painful, its suffering compounded in this particular case by the victim’s futile efforts to wish it away and by the ceremonial indifference of those who carry it out. Roy Neil Graves
Hope in “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge”
A poem by Emily Dickinson starts, “↜‘Hope’ is the thing with feathers—/ That perches in the soul—/ And sings the tune without the words—/ And never stops—at all—.” The ending section of Ambrose
“An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge”â•…â•… 211 Bierce’s story “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” allows access into the soul of the protagonist, Peyton Farquhar, and shows there an undiminished hope for survival and escape still fluttering away in his consciousness under the stress of certain death by hanging at the hands of Union troops during the American Civil War. Farquhar, a young Alabama planter and loyal Southerner, has tried to burn down a railroad bridge that is strategic to the campaign of federal troops as they subdue the rebellious South. Earlier, a Union soldier in disguise had visited the Farquhar plantation 30 miles away from the bridge and effectively tricked him into trying to burn it down. The visitor had explained that any civilians interfering with the invading Northern army would “be summarily hanged,” but Farquhar had taken the chance and been caught. As the story opens, he faces certain death, poised over Owl Creek with a noose around his neck while Federal soldiers proceed with the details of his hanging. Overall, the story shows that, in the face of certain death, the human instinct to hope for a miracle can push a man to elaborate lengths to keep him from confronting the end of selfhood. Perched in the soul, hope may “sing the tune” to the very end, a soaring flight of fancy. By means of an inner monologue, a tour de force passage that uses stream of consciousness, part 3 of Bierce’s brief tale allows access into a process that no one can follow in reality: It shows a man’s optimistic delusions during the second or so it takes him to fall to an instantaneous death that breaks his neck and leaves his body swaying in the breeze. The several pages of prose that elaborate Farquhar’s thoughts during this instant make his “escape” seem so real as to fool a first-time reader into believing that this “one already dead” is indeed managing to gain his freedom. The author’s capacity to trick the reader into suspending disbelief and following Farquhar on his hopeful mental journey involves a good bit of juggling, since the real time of Farquhar’s reverie, a second or so, does not mesh with the extended period a reader needs to scan what transpires in Farquhar’s mind: The instant Farquhar falls, he feels excruciating pain and suffocation in his throat but almost immediately activates a capacity for hopeful self-deception that causes him to believe the
rope has broken and he has dropped into the water, escaped a barrage of bullets, scrambled onto the bank, run for a whole day through tangled woods, and finally arrived back home to be greeted by his smiling wife. As this delusion unfolds, Bierce drops broad hints that this escape is unreal—psychedelic details, fantastic flora, and mystical details in the heavens. Nonetheless, a reader may still buy into the fantasy of the protagonist’s trip home, only to have all hopes dashed when the author reports Farquhar’s death in the last sentence. One effect of Bierce’s story is to call all foolish hopes into question—Farquhar’s, but also the reader’s. All humans will die, despite their own elaborate efforts to fool themselves into thinking they are invulnerable. Some, like Farquhar, will die cruel deaths sanctioned by military ceremony and protocol. The cynical tone of the story enforces a realistic view by making a reader participate in the fool’s journey of false hope. Though Farquhar’s death is individual, it symbolizes that of his homeland, the South, deluding itself into believing it can escape its inevitable doom. As an example of naturalism, a mode of pessimistic realism that pervaded prose fiction before 1900, this story holds out no false hope, either in this life or the next. Here, no heroism and no heaven assuage a lonely and torturous end. By downplaying Farquhar’s death as “an occurrence,” even Bierce’s title underscores the view that human actions look trivial in an uncaring cosmos, with death just an insignificant aspect of the universal routine. In the microcosm of the story, military guiles and ceremonies preempt humane considerations, and ironic outcomes leave no room for people of any social class to exercise positive thinking as a means of overcoming destiny. Still, futile hope may persist in the human mind until the bitter end. Roy Neil Graves
Isolation in “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge”
In the short story “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge,” the theme of isolation pervades a situation that Ambrose Bierce brings to life through a combination of external description and internal monologue (or stream of consciousness) as the pro-
212â•…â•… Black Elk tagonist struggles in vain to evade his own death, the ultimately isolating event in the human life cycle. The plot shows circumstances evolving quickly to wall the main character off from his family, home, and peers. Alone in that condition, with only his inner resources at hand to draw on, he shows himself victimized even in the final seconds of his life by the false hope of escape. Only the reader keeps him company on his last, hallucinatory journey. Peyton Farquhar, Bierce’s protagonist and center of consciousness, and the only rounded character in the story, is a handsome young Alabama planter, a civilian gentleman whom Union forces single out, set up, capture, isolate, and hang as part of their attempt to subdue his homeland, the South, during the American Civil War. In a mental effort toward self-preservation, Farquhar envisions himself as the hero of his own narrative, escaping death by falling into the stream, scrambling out amid a spray of bullets, and making his way before nightfall back to the security of his home. Bierce’s last sentence depicts Farquhar in his real, and ultimate, isolation: “.╯.╯. dead; his body, with a broken neck, [swinging] gently from side to side beneath the timbers of the Owl Creek bridge.” Farquhar’s wife, his sole ally, is 30 miles away at home and unaware of her husband’s fate. (The story mentions their children but does not depict them.) The others who are present, enemy soldiers carrying out his execution with cold military precision, offer no human company during his last ordeal; in the course of his imagined escape, they spray him with bullets. Multiple factors contribute to Farquhar’s isolation. The story is vague about why this 35-year-old could not enlist to fight for the Confederacy, but we know he is “at heart a soldier” who has had to stay at home, while others of his age and class have gone off to war. He wants to help out and envisions himself heroic. His only peer or social connection is his wife, a flat character—passive, powerless, and absent when he dies. His homeland is occupied by the enemy, the Union Army, and the story insinuates that they have intentionally set him up as a kind of scapegoat just so they can have a military rationale for putting him to death. As a planter, he symbolizes to them the Southern social and economic system
they are fighting to overthrow. Farquhar is a man without allies who must act alone—and die alone. In demeanor, the enemy soldiers who preside over Farquhar’s execution are detached from and impassive toward their victim. As Bierce shows Farquhar’s consciousness during his last ordeal, dealing with the painful suffocation of the noose but even at that moment conjuring up an alternate reality to reunite himself with his dear wife, Farquhar’s only real companions in the world are the story’s readers, each a separate and helpless witness to the futile efforts of a dying man as he tries to make one last human contact by returning home. Bierce’s closing sentence shows Farquhar in absolute isolation, left without spouse or children, home, fellow soldiers, countrymen, or even the contact of the beloved land itself as he dangles in thin air above the creek. Farquhar’s lonely terminal struggle lets readers imagine the isolation of a cruel death. His alienated situation offers no hope for any kind of mitigating reunion in eternity. In Bierce’s bleak microcosm, each lonely human struggles, outnumbered, against an array of alien forces. Roy Neil Graves
BLACK ELKâ•… Black Elk Speaksâ•… (1932)
A seminal work that merges history, politics, and spirituality, Black Elk Speaks serves as a testimony to the collective experience of Native American nations across the continent who were the victims of genocide and disenfranchisement during the 19th century. The narrative, originally transcribed and published in 1932 by the poet and philosopher John G. Neihardt (1881–1973), records the life and visions of Black Elk (1863–1950), a holy man from the Oglala Lakota (Sioux) nation, a traveler in Wild Bill’s Wild West Show, and a relative of the famous Chief Crazy Horse. Historically, the book conveys the early encounters between the U.S. Army and the Lakota people as experienced through the eyes of young Black Elk (Hehaka Sapa). The transformation of ancestral lands into Americanized settlements serves as a backdrop for the decimation of the sacred bison, General Custer’s last stand at Little Big Horn in 1876, and the butchering of Black Elk’s people at
Black Elk Speaksâ•…â•… 213 Wounded Knee in 1890. These pivotal events are told through the eyes and voice of a Lakota shaman, while recasting the history of the 19th-century North American continent in a new and critical light. Likewise, Black Elk Speaks underscores the political turmoil broiling between the American forces and the Lakota hierarchy. Treaties that are signed between leaders in Washington, D.C., and puppet chiefs are dissolved with ease by the U.S. Army when Lakota territories prove to be too rich with resources, such as gold, to remain in the hands of nonwhites. Making the Lakota tribal communities politically weak and dependent on government handouts further guarantees the passivity of Black Elk’s people. This is certainly the case concerning the “Hangs-Around-the-Fort” people who forfeit their lands, rights, and resources to become reliant on the U.S. Army for survival. More than just an elegiac chronicle of a people, Black Elk Speaks is a spiritual text that articulates the greater Native American consciousness while forging a path toward recovery and restoration from the crucible of abandonment and oppression. Michael Moreno
Community in Black Elk Speaks
Widespread colonization and the genocide of Native American tribes throughout the 19th century radically transformed the structure and power of indigenous communities, particularly the Lakota nation to which Black Elk belonged. Whereas ritual actions and customs throughout the community had served for countless centuries to articulate and define the identity of tribal members, Black Elk relates how his own community slowly begins to break down as the “Wasichus” (white Americans) annex ancestral territories and relocate tribal members to “small islands” (reservations) throughout his lifetime. Here in these small islands, remaining members of the Lakota community are disarmed, politically disenfranchised, and economically ruined to ensure their subservience to white American authority. An integral symbol Black Elk employs in his narrative to define his community is the “sacred hoop.” The circle, itself a universal image of ceaseless cycles of life and power, represents the entire
cosmological framework for Black Elk’s community. “You have noticed that everything an Indian does is in a circle,” Black Elk relates, “and that is because the Power of the World always works in circles.╯.╯.╯. The life of a man is a circle from childhood to childhood, and so it is in everything where power moves.” This sacred hoop, in turn, represents the solidarity of the Lakota nation. As such, community virtues such as sharing and providing for each other is an integral component to the survival, success, and proliferation of Black Elk’s community. This posits the Lakotas in opposition to the white colonizers, whose goals are predicated on ceaseless consumption of the land and its resources and the primacy of individual happiness. With the decimation of the bison and white acquisition and seizure of native lands, many of the Lakota tribes watch their sacred hoops fracture and disintegrate under the heavy weight of the American republic’s westward expansion. Unable to compete with American military power or political doubletalk from Washington, many tribal communities base themselves near soldier camps in an effort to survive. Black Elk identifies Chief Red Cloud’s people as the “Hangs-Around-The-Fort” people, for they are one community who embrace the emerging hegemonic authority and think little of permitting ad hoc native chiefs and leaders to sell off remaining land claims sought after by the military and industrialists. As a respected visionary and mystic healer, Black Elk believes it is his duty to mend the broken sacred hoop of his community and restore his people’s dignity and power. However, major setbacks—such as the exodus of much of his tribe into “Grandmother’s Land” (Canada); the assassination of Crazy Horse, their brave leader; and the infamous massacre at Wounded Knee—discourage Black Elk and makes him realize the grave circumstances of his diminishing community. He says, “If a man or woman or child dies, it does not matter long, for the nation lives on. It was the nation that was dying, and the vision was for the nation; but I have done nothing with [this vision].” Despite the new protest dances, such as the Horse Dance and the Ghost Dance, rituals adapted from other indigenous tribes in an effort to reinvigorate the customs and culture of indigenous commu-
214â•…â•… Black Elk nities, Black Elk eventually realizes that the strength and survival of his community resided in the coming together of all Native American nations. In this way, the notion of community broadens to incorporate all the indigenous peoples of the North American continent. Thus, Black Elk Speaks serves as a testimony for a collective consciousness of Native Americans and, in many ways, as a sacred text that underscores the process of these communities coming together during their cultural crises. Michael Moreno
Oppression in Black Elk Speaks
As with most of the members of his community, Black Elk, a Lakota of the Oglala band, anticipated with dread the eventual arrival of the Wasichus (white men) to his lands. Fear of genocide and cultural erasure was associated with the U.S. invasion, and Black Elk Speaks underscores this collective concern through the narrative voice of Black Elk himself: “[E]very one was saying that the Wasichus were coming and that they were going to take our country and rub us all out and that we should all have to die fighting.” The expectation is widely met with feelings of helplessness and inevitability. This is the first wave of societal oppression levied against the Lakota communities in Black Elk’s time. Changes to the land through the wholesale slaughter of the bison, the feverish extraction of gold from Lakota territories such as the Black Hills, and the military occupation of ancestral lands are all features that contribute to the widespread oppression of Black Elk’s people. Indeed, Black Elk maintains that men like General George Armstrong Custer, whom he calls “Pahuska” (Long Hair), “had no right to go [to the Black Hills], because all that country was ours.” This disenfranchisement of land, customs, and loss of sustenance is further augmented by the battles and genocidal policies the U.S. government authorizes and carries out against many of the Native American nations throughout the 19th century. Through a calculated campaign of deception and military strength, the American government ensures that tribal nations, such as the Lakota, will no longer pose a threat to the country’s designs on expansion and settlement. Retelling a series of attacks aimed at
weakening the tribal community, Black Elk laments that the treatment of his people and the betrayal on the part of the Wasichus underscore the fact that U.S. forces will not rest without ultimate victory over the Lakota tribes. “Wherever we went,” Black Elk states, “the soldiers came to kill us, and it was all our own country.” Moreover, despite the treaties the Lakota have signed with emissaries from Washington, D.C.—legal promises that the tribal communities can keep their ancestral lands—the federal government often reneges on its agreements and later annexes the territories for their resources. “[T] hey were chasing us .╯.╯. because we remembered [the treaty] and they forgot,” according to Black Elk. To further oppress the Lakota, the Wasichus disarm the tribal members who bear guns and install political puppet chiefs such as Spotted Tail, who serves at the pleasure of the U.S. government. Deliberate acts of oppression like these not only demoralize individual tribal members but also break the very spirit of the Lakota people. Forcibly relocating the Lakota also aids the U.S. government in not only containing Black Elk’s people, but also in securing social and psychological domination over dissenting members such as Crazy Horse. Indeed, prophecies and ritual protests are manifest throughout Black Elk’s chronicle, thus emphasizing the deep impact the U.S. government has on the tribal communities. The prophecies of oppression are resonant narratives handed down by the Lakota elders, and Black Elk Speaks relates how Black Elk is aware of such messages. He recalls one of these visions from a holy man who stated, “When this happens [the arrival of the Wasichus], you shall live in square gray houses, in a barren land, and beside those square gray houses you shall starve.” From the onset, the Lakota believe that the Wasichus are the harbingers of death and destruction. However, the oppression that is in store is portrayed in Black Elk Speaks as something that cannot be prevented. Rituals like the Ghost Dance, which was widely adopted by many oppressed Native American nations during the 19th century, are thought to be an antidote in restoring traditional life. The importance of “bring[ing] [Black Elk’s] people back into the sacred hoop,” then, is an integral feature of the Ghost Dance for the Lakota.
Black Elk Speaksâ•…â•… 215 It would mean unifying a broken people and reempowering them by resurrecting the slaughtered bison and deceased ancestors. Unfortunately, such hope in the face of oppression is short-lived, for events such as the massacre at Wounded Knee in 1890 all but destroy the cultural or political visibility of the Lakota people. Michael Moreno
Spirituality in Black Elk Speaks
While Black Elk Speaks is a historical and political account of the Oglala Lakota (Sioux) Nation in the 19th century, it is also regarded by many as an important narrative of conviction and spirituality. Throughout this turbulent era of American expansionism and the Indian Wars, visions of otherworldly images and sacred rituals performed by his community call and guide Black Elk (Hehaka Sapa), a renowned holy man and healer. Charged with the task of bringing his broken people together and healing the “sacred hoop” of their unity, Black Elk learns through trial and error how lonely and yet empowering it is to be chosen for such an auspicious duty. Black Elk’s first vision comes to him when he is only nine years old. While traveling with his community, who are following the seasonal bison migrations, Black Elk suddenly falls ill and begins to envision a great landscape in the clouds with dancing horses and six sacred and ancient spirits. These spirits, whom he refers to as “the Grandfathers,” offer him words of wisdom and prophecy while imparting important gifts, which symbolize Black Elk’s role as a spiritual leader in his community. Holy items—such as a wooden cup whose liquid reflects the sky, a peace pipe adorned with the image of an outstretched eagle, and a flowering staff that serves as the symbolic “sacred tree” of the Lakota community—are imparted to Black Elk, thus anointing him as a shaman and spiritual guide for others. These visions and the mission of mending the sacred hoop of his fractured people are both awesome and daunting tasks for Black Elk as a young boy. For several years, he is reluctant to share this experience with others for fear that “the part of [him] that talks would try to make words for meaning” but would only come across “like fog and
get away from [him].” Nevertheless, as a witness to the suffering and genocide of his nation, Black Elk uses his spirituality and the mission with which he has been empowered as a vehicle for his own maturation into adulthood. The crimes and abuses committed by the U.S. Army only bolster his testimony against these atrocities recounted throughout Black Elk Speaks. Chief Crazy Horse, Black Elk’s famous relative, had a similar vision and mission when he was just a boy. Black Elk thus recognizes that power and confidence can come through using his ancestral gifts to strengthen his community. As such, an important part of his spiritual development occurs when he realizes that the world of spirits “is the real world that is behind this one, and everything we see here is something like a shadow from that world.” This new perspective gives Black Elk the ability to transform his vision into a ritual act that the community can perform. Making a direct connection between the mundane world and the spiritual realm, he believes, will heal his people and deliver them from further disenfranchisement by the Wasichus (white men). The first of these rituals that Black Elk and the elders orchestrate occurs when he is 15 years old. Using members of the community as stand-ins for the dancing horses and the grandfathers of the original vision, Black Elk inaugurates the Sacred Horse Dance as a way to bring the community together, to offer its members hope and comfort, and to draw “a shadow cast upon the earth” as a way to illustrate the Lakota’s direct association with the ancient and spiritual realm of their ancestors. As a simple conduit for this spiritual vision, Black Elk maintains that the ritual is necessary to generate a lasting power, and that performing this vision with his people is the only way to make the spirit of the ancestors come alive. In Black Elk Speaks, imitating this outer world of the spirits brings the Lakota community closer to a unifying source of energy and wisdom. Recreating sacred circles during the rituals performed is, thus, integral in mending the sacred hoop. Black Elk says, “Everything the Power of the World does is done in a circle”; therefore, erasing the division between these worlds becomes a way to regenerate an identity for his people and make all things cyclical
216â•…â•… Blake, William and connected. Performing other rites, such as the imported Ghost Dance or the Heyoka Ceremony, which mimicks a later vision of Black Elk, serves equally to make the community not only happy but empowered at a time when battles waged against the Lakota nation and other Native American tribes are destroying the livelihood and voices of these indigenous peoples. Michael Moreno
BLAKE, WILLIAMâ•… Songs of Innocence and of Experienceâ•… (1789, 1794)
William Blake’s Songs of Innocence (1789) were included in Songs of Experience (1794), a book of lyrics engraved with illustrations and then handcolored. Blake’s Songs are known for their visual effects, enhanced by his illustrations and his graphic words and images. Not immediately popular when it appeared, Songs included lyrics that later became canonical texts, such as “The Chimney Sweeper” poems and “Tyger.” Songs of Innocence begins with a cheerful dialogue between the narrator’s persona, a piper, and a child. The lyrics that follow present a benevolent world with happy children and infants, tame animals and birds, and bountiful nature. Songs of Experience starts with a grim soliloquy by the narrator’s persona, the Bard, addressing the barren earth. The lyrics that follow present miserable children and infants, wild animals, and destroyed nature. These lyrics question faith by focusing on social and religious corruption. While the chimney sweepers and the children of Innocence patiently bear their hardships with promises of a rewarding afterlife, their counterparts in Experience expose the hypocrisy of their patriarchal protectors for perpetuating such abuses and failing to offer relief. Through his two sets of lyrics, Blake (1757– 1827) explores such themes as innocence and experience, spirituality, nature, parenthood, education, love, and suffering. It is important to note that he does not suggest a binary relationship between the songs of Innocence and those of Experience because they supposedly complement each other. The poems trace the growth of the poet/ speaker from innocence to experience, from the role
of a mere piper to that of the all-knowing Bard. Blake also does not offer a definite answer concerning his political and religious beliefs but, rather, presents disparate orthodox and unorthodox views to consider. Mariam Radhwi
Innocence and Experience in Songs of Innocence and of Experience
Blake uses the theme of innocence and experience to criticize institutionalized religion as a corruptive force, ruining children and grownups alike. In Songs of Innocence and of Experience, he demonstrates the different ways of perceiving the world. Innocence offers an innocent perspective of the world, namely that of children, who simply believe what they are told. Although difficult for adults to appreciate, these lyrics reveal children’s socially acquired, though unquestioning, attitude toward religious and social doctrines, an outlook accepting of any possible discrepancies or injustices. Experience depicts the same world from a different perspective, exposing the injustices and cruelty dominant in the world and pleading for immediate relief. For Blake, innocence is the outlook on life that stems from an uncomplicated, childish viewpoint. He values such a view because it lacks the bitterness accompanying experience and is all-accepting rather than questioning. The lyrics in Experience differ from those in Innocence in their pervading gloom and skepticism stemming from the experiences one gains from passing through life’s challenges and hardships. Although such experiences shape the necessary maturity accompanying adulthood, experience endows one with the critical outlook that reshapes formerly perceived beliefs, especially the unquestioned acceptance of suffering. However, such an experienced outlook is not limited to adults but is also experienced by the abused children of “The Chimney Sweeper” and “The School Boy” who resist their oppressed situations and expose their patriarchal protectors. The songs also have differing ways of treating childhood. In “A Cradle Song,” childhood raises holy thoughts of baby Jesus and a passion for the health of the sleeping baby. The poem presents a mother watching over her sleeping child and
Songs of Innocence and of Experienceâ•…â•… 217 grateful for Jesus’ sacrifice for the redemption of humanity, including her baby and herself. The same scene is differently presented in Experience, where adults perceive childhood jealously. For example, the children’s nurse in the “Nurse’s Song” is embittered while she watches her charges play freely in the valley. Rather than raising holy thoughts or emotions of gratitude and benevolence, the children only remind her of her declining youth. She therefore secretly mocks their joy and soothes her bitterness with thoughts of their own future decline. Innocence and experience also interact in such poems as the explicitly contrasted “The Lamb” of Innocence and “The Tyger” of Experience. The speaker’s innocent outlook causes him to view the lamb in the spiritual manner with which he was taught to perceive life. The speaker thus glorifies the Creator by commenting on the lamb’s simple and immediate physical needs, which the child shares, such as enjoying life, food, clothing, and a beautiful voice. The child excitedly concludes this list of blessings with the additional delight of sharing their names with Jesus, the lamb, and the child. The speaker in the second lyric perceives the tiger with a rather mature outlook, commenting on its complex nature in a series of rhetorical questions. Although the speaker dwells at length on each physical feature, the tiger appears to defy his conceptions and rather puzzles him with its pervasive strength. The speaker wonders about the tiger’s creator by listing the incredible powers required in creating such a creature, but he refrains from identifying this creator, unlike the speaker in “The Lamb,” who joyfully identifies the lamb’s creator and his as one. The creator of “The Tyger” is also paradoxically challenged by being materialized and humanized with his iron-working tools, though he is repeatedly glorified for his great abilities to create such a being, the tiger, and its weaker counterpart, the lamb. By juxtaposing the tiger and the lamb, the speaker explores creation from perspectives of innocence and of experience, the simple child’s eye and the complicated adult’s. From the previous examples, the realization the speaker achieves in Experience produces the skeptical tone of the second section. These lyrics criticize the state of humanity only after the children of Innocence
have led a happy and innocent life, abiding by the religious and social concepts that they have been taught to internalize. In the second section, Blake suggestively reveals the situation of those who have failed to internalize such concepts and the threat they pose to institutionalized religion with their questionings. The abused groups of the latter section thus reject the otherworldly beliefs by which the children of innocence were oppressed, instead demanding immediate relief. Mariam Radhwi
Nature in Songs of Innocence and of Experience
While reading William Blake’s Songs of Innocence and of Experience, it is important to conceive of the poet’s nature in generic terms, as including all of creation. Throughout his Songs, Blake examines different aspects of “nature,” considering each according to prevalent beliefs. Besides the natural world, nature in Blake’s Songs includes human nature. Innocence focuses on innocent human nature and promotes a positive outlook of life, to the extent of accepting injustice and misery and emphasizing human love. Experience stresses humans’ darker side, such as jealousy, hatred, and their potential for destruction. Various natural elements appear in each section of Songs, including wild and tame animals, various plants and flowers, and a wide selection of birds and beasts. Nature in its disparate forms functions as a protective shield, especially for the children of Innocence, offering comfort and protecting them from unknown dangers. Nature also repeatedly changes color and consistency in both sections, taking various forms and roles. On the visual level, Blake published his Songs in illuminated printings that were hand-colored using a complicated process. Most of his lyrics were printed with colorful illustrations that further enriched the meaning he conveyed with his words. To examine the choice of colors would be a futile task because they inevitably changed with time while appearing in different manuscripts. However, one important aspect of Blake’s drawing efforts is that using such a costly method to print his poems visually and textually emphasizes the beauty and importance of nature.
218â•…â•… Blake, William Another aspect of the visual version of Songs is the way Blake’s nature encloses and surrounds the text in each section. In Innocence, the plants and shrubbery are thick and rich in leaves and fruits, heavily intermingling with the text by spreading on the pages and equally shielding the children and the lines and words of each lyric. But in Experience, the plants are visually less intense and carry fewer leaves and fruit than in the former section. Such differences in visual imagery suggest bleak surroundings that are enhanced by the woeful images of the elderly and children. The theme of nature appears on the textual level, coinciding with the visual one, and is comparably unique. Blake skillfully produces vivid natural images, starting from the introduction with its blooming surroundings, where a child commands a piper to compose happy songs out of natural or rural elements. Appearing in bright shades of color, the natural surroundings start as tame and protective of children, and human nature starts as loving. But nature becomes textually desolate in the introduction to Experience. In the second section, the initial blooming imagery and the celebration of human nature decline along with the decline of nature, as in “My Pretty Rose Tree,” and with the pervading corruption in human institutions, as in “The Garden of Love” and “London.” Such decline is introduced with the poet’s woeful words addressed to a fallen earth, which, however, justifies its fallen state as initiated by human corruption. Humans in turn blame the declining surroundings for their fall. Such images are repeatedly emphasized by the shabby and rundown buildings of “London” and the decline of life in poems such as “A Poison Tree” and “Holy Thursday,” where human nature and surrounding nature deteriorate equally. Nature is also continuously challenged in Experience through characters such as the puzzled speaker of “The Fly,” who muses on the ambiguity of life, questioning the difference between humans and nonhumans, animals and inanimate objects, and hence the living and the dead. The speaker concludes with the paradoxical view that the ability to think is the defining aspect between those pairings. But this conclusion contradicts the prevalent beliefs
that humans should submit to their superiors, patriarchal protectors, a view graphically emphasized in “The Little Boy Lost.” Blake repeatedly questions the reality of nature, which complicates his views, especially in instances where nature takes a life of its own, as in “The Tyger” and “The Sick Rose,” or where natural elements become agents of evil for humans, as in “The Poison Tree.” Blake therefore uses the theme of nature in various ways, leaving the question of the nature of “nature” open. Both human and nonhuman nature appear in different forms and function in different ways. Nature has a tame and positive side, but Blake continuously emphasizes that the other, darker side is comparably important and should be appreciated whether it is initiated by human corruption or not. Mariam Radhwi
Spirituality in Songs of Innocence and of Experience
Modern critics have focused on William Blake’s spirituality as it stems from the tension between his Protestant upbringing and his radicalism, both of which shape the profound, though ambiguous, symbolism in his Songs. This was perhaps fueled by his spiritual questionings and contemporary political upheavals, notably the French Revolution. Blake’s attitude toward spirituality and the world in general changed drastically into an increasingly skeptical, albeit extraordinary, view. The theme of spirituality in Songs functions separately from religion, though the two themes share basic principles. Blake believed in the fundamentals of Christianity, especially Jesus and his encompassing passion for humanity as displayed in his sacrifice. Despite his basic beliefs, Blake rejected orthodox religion and continually criticized the way belief was institutionalized and thus corrupted and abused. His radical religious stand produced a spiritual outlook that valued life and the individual, understanding God through the self and its surrounding creation rather than through religious institutions. God thus spiritually manifests himself to humans on an individual basis, without any mediators. In Songs, God the Creator and God the Savior appear in all surroundings—the innocent smiling infants and the wonderful creatures, such as the tiger of Experience
Fahrenheit 451â•…â•… 219 and its innocent counterpart, the lamb. Throughout Songs, Blake emphasizes God’s divine abilities and love for humans as favored over the popular image of God as a wrathful creator. Blake treats the theme of spirituality differently in both parts of Songs. The lyrics in Innocence sound like religious hymns, connecting each worldly experience, even the miserable ones, to elevating spiritual experiences, such as baby Jesus’ salvaging humans in “A Cradle Song.” The poems in this section also repeatedly promise afterlife rewards for the oppressed, a fact soothing the abused in poems such as “The Chimney Sweeper.” The readers, supposedly children, are repeatedly encouraged to shun worldly and material comfort and retain a spiritual outlook. The lyrics thus overemphasize spiritual benevolence and offer comfort through repeated images of Jesus aiding the needy, as in “The Chimney Sweeper,” and “The Little Black Boy.” Even parental negligence and abuse in poems such as “The Little Boy Lost” and its counterpart “The Little Boy Found” is excusable because of the pervading spiritual optimism, guarding and rewarding children. Five years after publishing Songs of Innocence, Blake offered a further radical view of spirituality, revealing great abhorrence of workplace abuses and skepticism of the optimism expressed in Innocence. In Songs of Experience, Blake questions the beliefs he had formerly offered by presenting the same incidents from a different viewpoint, that of experience. Childhood is no longer a happy and carefree stage, and spirituality fails to comfort the abused. The oppressed reject otherworldly rewards of spirituality, arguing for immediate relief and exposing the patriarchy, parents, and religious and national rulers for their failed roles. The lyrics in Experience repeatedly question the good of worldly and spiritual fulfillment in light of the existing corruption pervading churches, workplaces, and homes. Such questioning was seditious at that time because church and state were viewed as interchangeable and sacred concepts. Blake reveals the social reaction to such questioning toward the end of Experience in “The Little Boy Lost.” After poems on two lost children, he traces a boy’s being lost spiritually, which causes him to be burned. Blake questions institutionalized religion through
the young boy, who is doomed for merely wondering at the discrepancy between conventional teachings, theoretical beliefs, and their actual implementation, which tends to generate injustice and hatred rather than highlight God’s all-encompassing love and benevolence. By such criticism, Blake raises questions as to the nature of belief and promotes a subjective form of spirituality. With his young hero suffering condemnation and his helpless parents’ woe at losing their child, Blake further magnifies the evils of institutionalized religion and the need for spiritual freedom. In the previous examples, Blake’s innocents enjoy spiritual freedom because they are shielded from prevalent abuses, which they encounter once they gain experience. While Innocence celebrates Jesus’ benevolence, his relieving the needy and spreading happiness, Experience fails to relieve people, as exemplified in its abusive, tyrannical figures who initiate mistreatment of children and the marginalized. The spiritual tone of Innocence soon turns secular with Blake’s supplications in Experience to resist corruption and to revive the bleak surroundings. Songs thus revisualizes spirituality by questioning orthodox beliefs and experimenting with a radical form of spirituality that differs from organized religion and ensures spiritual freedom. Mariam Radhwi
BRADBURY, RAYâ•… Fahrenheit 451â•… (1953)
Ray Bradbury (b. 1920) is regarded as one of the most influential American writers of the 20th century. More concerned with story and character than technology, Bradbury’s science fiction is best categorized as “humanist.” In Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury imagines a world where books are illegal. Squadrons of “firemen” are employed to burn books, and anyone caught with a book is arrested. Published in 1953, just as television was becoming a popular medium, Fahrenheit 451 presents a world in which independent thought and the questioning of authority are subversive practices. For Bradbury, storytelling is among the noblest of human activities, and books, as transmitters of story, are sacred objects. By destroying books, the
220â•…â•… Bradbury, Ray state in Fahrenheit 451 limits human expression and restricts the human spirit. Books and the ideas they carry are threats to a society that does not want its citizens to exercise independent thought. The novel’s protagonist, Guy Montag, discovers that the power of storytelling lies in its ability to bind people into community. At the end of the novel, Montag finds himself part of an alienated society, the function of which is to remember the stories from books lost to fire. With the destruction of the printed word, humans and human communities become the protectors and medium for the old stories, stories that carry the history of humanity and its identity. Mark D. Dunn
Education in Fahrenheit 451
The education of the fireman Guy Montag begins with a question. Walking home after a long day at the station, Montag meets his 17-year-old neighbor, Clarisse McClellan, who asks, “Do you ever read any of the books you burn?” In Ray Bradbury’s nightmare world of censorship, historical revision, and thought control, reading books is illegal, and firemen like Montag are responsible for ensuring that the law is not broken. Books are confiscated. Books are burned. People caught possessing books are put on trial and jailed. But the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451 has a secret he does not share with his young neighbor: Guy Montag has been collecting books. Despite his profession, Montag cannot resist the allure of books and the knowledge they carry. From the beginning of the novel, Guy Montag is a willing student waiting for a teacher. At their second meeting, Clarisse teaches Montag about the joy of rainfall. Rain and the natural world outside the city are foreign elements to Montag. He has never tasted rainfall and must learn of this small participation in the cycle of nature from watching Clarisse. Dissatisfied with her teachers, Clarisse has moved her classroom to the outdoors. She learns from the world what she needs to know of it. Speaking of the drudgery of the school system, she says, “[W]e never ask questions, or at least most don’t; they just run the answers at you.╯.╯.╯. It’s a lot of funnels and a lot of water poured down the spout and out the bottom.” The model of education Clarisse
describes is one that most students are familiar with, in which the teacher provides information that students are expected to consume. However, Clarisse knows that the important aspects of life are not taught in her school. The type of learning Clarisse longs for is not the kind imposed on students by a system, but rather an opportunity for students to find understanding of the mysteries of the universe within themselves. After all, the word education has its roots in the Latin educare: “to bring out.” Clarisse also knows that the process of learning begins with asking questions. Montag begins to question his job when a woman chooses to be burned alive rather than to abandon her books. Disturbed by the incident, Montag calls in sick to work and retreats into bed. There are no answers to the questions that trouble him, but he suspects that the books he burns might “get us halfway out of the cave.” Like Clarisse, he questions the effectiveness of the school system he has known. Education, in Montag’s world, is learning the robotic functions of “pressing buttons, pulling switches, fitting nuts and bolts.” Schools, says Montag, focus too much on obtaining a job and not enough on the pleasures of learning and the importance of curiosity. When Clarisse McClellan and her family disappear, Montag is left without a guide. His curiosity has been aroused by his reading and by conversations with Clarisse, but he has no one to share it with. He remembers Professor Faber, a man he met in a park some time before. Faber, a former English professor, tries to help Montag sift through the jumble of new ideas and insights that confuse him. Montag laments that “nobody listens anymore.” The ability to listen, Montag learns, is an important second step in the learning process, after the ability to ask difficult questions. Professor Faber teaches Montag that ignorance, and a willingness to display ignorance, is one of the most useful tools a student can possess. Without an ability to accept and recognize within oneself a need for learning, a student will never learn. As Guy Montag demonstrates, education and knowledge are dangerous things because the smallest taste of learning can ignite a desire for more. The education of Guy Montag begins when he questions
Fahrenheit 451â•…â•… 221 ideas he has always accepted. Although Montag finds no easy answers to his questions, he does develop a need to act upon his knowledge. He learns that with understanding comes responsibility. Montag decides the best way he can honor his teachers and the truths they have pointed him toward is to protect knowledge from being lost. His education leads him from the comfortable illusion of a fabricated society to the harsher reality of nature found in the wilds outside the city. No longer limited by assumptions, and admitting his own lack of knowledge, Guy Montag begins to see himself as part of a larger process beyond the nightmare politics of the only society he has ever known. Mark D. Dunn
Individual and Society in Fahrenheit 451
Individuality is dangerous in the world portrayed in Fahrenheit 451. A totalitarian society, a system wherein almost everything is controlled by the government, demands that individuals conform to the crowd. To stand out in this type of society is to be targeted by forces that seek to control and limit human potential. As Captain Beatty warns Montag, “We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal.” Montag’s point (even though it is the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution, that states all men are created equal) is that the idea of an individual within society eats away at the uniformity of the greater society. In Fahrenheit 451, one method of protecting society from the will of its individual members is book burning—one of the most extreme manifestations of censorship. A state determined to exist as a single political body must suppress divergent voices. If one member of the whole acts independently, the state will splinter into a society of individuals. Therefore, totalitarian governments suppress the qualities and ideas that make individuals unique. The irony for Bradbury is that society as a whole is made up of individuals, all pursuing their personal goals while contributing to the common interest. The ideal society will balance the rights of the individual with the needs of the collective. By placing his characters in such a stifling atmosphere, Bradbury shows the dangers of the potential imbalance.
Guy Montag finds himself at odds with his society. Riding the subway one afternoon, he is unable to remember the Sermon on the Mount, which he has read recently. The train car is filled with an advertisement for toothpaste. While the people on the train sing along and stamp their feet with the commercial, Montag explodes with rage. This scene shows the individual rebelling against the demands of a totalitarian society. Montag’s personality has been suppressed to the degree that he erupts in violent rebellion, shouting “Shut up, shut up, shut up” to the crowded train car. The other passengers think he has gone insane, but his action is only the natural response of an individual who has repressed his unique nature for too long a time. Perhaps the best explanation of the individual’s role in society comes to us from Reverend Padover, an outcast who welcomes Montag into the new society. The reverend was punished for writing a book entitled The Fingers in the Glove; the Proper Relationship between the Individual and Society. In this analogy, the individual is an active part of the whole. It is the individual who, ultimately, must take responsibility for the actions of his or her society by challenging the state should it go against the will of the people. Mark D. Dunn
Survival in Fahrenheit 451
The theme of survival dominates much of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451. The survival of Guy Montag as he is pursued by the state functions as the main plot and action in the novel. He runs from the only community he has known and turns to the world outside civilization for shelter. In the wilds beyond the city, Montag is befriended by Granger and his band of exiles. Granger greets Montag in a strange way, saying, “Welcome back from the dead.” Here we see the accepted reality of the technological world revealed as illusion. It is to the wasteland outside the city that Montag goes for survival and where he finds community at last. The journey of the novel’s protagonist points to a deeper sort of survival. It is the survival of culture— in the form of the written word—that concerns Bradbury the most. By memorizing lost texts, Montag and his new friends carry the cultural wealth of history into an uncertain future. Each survivor
222â•…â•… Bradbury, Ray embodies a work of literature and introduces himself not with a name but with the title of the work he or she has memorized. “I am Plato’s Republic,” says one. Bradbury’s point is that the reader, through the act of reading the text and committing it to memory, becomes the text. In the end, we are made of and defined by the stories we carry. Granger explains how the group proceeds quietly, making no overt acts of rebellion. As Granger says, “If we are destroyed, the knowledge is dead, perhaps for good.” In this way, the survival of the cultural wealth of literature depends on the survival of its carriers. Literature survives in Fahrenheit 451 by changing its medium. Literature (from the Latin littera, or “letter”) in recent centuries has been transmitted primarily through the written word. In Bradbury’s novel, books are banned because the ideas they transmit threaten the state. It is thought that these ideas can be destroyed with the destruction of the physical text. Bradbury tells us that the essence of “the book” and the stories and thoughts contained within—the “knowledge,” as Granger would say— transcend the physical text. Literature changes in Fahrenheit 451 from a textual form into an oral form. Ripped from the page, the word survives. The advantage of the oral tradition over print is that it is infinitely portable and infinitely adaptable. A story written on a page is set. For as long as the text survives, the story or idea will go unchanged. But the oral tradition that Guy Montag enters toward the end of Fahrenheit 451 passes literature along like dna. The oral text will forever evolve, change, and adapt to the demands of its environment. The story survives for as long as there are people willing to speak and to listen. In this way, literature exists beyond the page and is no longer dependent on the printing press or computer for survival. Fire cannot stop it. Freed from the page, the knowledge transmitted in books returns to its place of origin within the mind and bodies of the people it represents. Mark D. Dunn
BRADBURY, RAYâ•… The Martian Chroniclesâ•… (1950)
Ray Bradbury’s The Martian Chronicles has enjoyed widespread popularity since its first printing in
1950. Its collection of interrelated short stories is set in the future, beginning in January 1999 and ending in October 2026. The stories are of varying length, ranging from a few paragraphs to approximately 14 pages. They are set both on Earth and on Mars. They detail the Earth settlers’ struggles as they leave home; colonize an unfamiliar land; meet strange beings; and, most of all, confront themselves. They cause the reader to both despair over the human condition and hope for its fragile future. The main subject matter of The Martian Chronicles is the human condition, and Bradbury explores that condition through a variety of themes. One theme deals with love: the dysfunction of a loveless marriage, the loss of a son, the hope of meeting a new love, and the heartrending grief of losing one’s family. In exploring the theme of nature, Bradbury describes the energy of a new planet. Its seasons are different; its growth spurts are odd; its rains, pools, cities, and ruins collect and reflect both the human spirit and the alien Martian past in ways that are familiar and strange. The natural world is inseparable from both the colonizer and the native, for both are encompassed by a planet that has its own rhythms and mysteries. Therefore, alienation, not only from one’s spouse, children, and culture but also from one’s planet, plays an important role in this book. The settlers have left Earth behind or are preparing to do so; they are trying to understand a land that is hostile and strange. How is one to understand oneself when the fissure between oneself and one’s land, or oneself and one’s spouse, is deep and seemingly permanent? Anna Minore
Alienation in The Martian Chronicles
The theme of alienation underlies almost every story in Ray Bradbury’s The Martian Chronicles. Alienation has something to do with being withdrawn, isolated, or indifferent; it indicates separation, and it can go so far as to include estrangement, unfriendliness, or even hostility. Statistically, it is a lack of correlation; psychologically, it can be manifested as insanity. Thus, Bradbury’s first action—placing his characters on another planet (Mars)—in and of itself places the characters in a state of alienation from the reader and from the character’s own natural
The Martian Chronicles â•…â•… 223 environment. Bradbury’s characters are cut off from their ecosystem and their wider system of social support. They do not know how the planet works; for example, they plant seeds only to see huge towering trees minutes after a harsh rain. They do not know how the Martians think: it is only in casting themselves off the cliff that they decipher the Martians’ pacifist intentions. Most horrifyingly, they do not understand each other. Husbands crush their wives’ dreams, astronauts kill each other at point-blank range, and a son looks speculatively at the alien presence, half known and half understood, of his father. They cannot ultimately trust their own perceptions of time, space, or even sanity. Finally, Bradbury’s characters, both Martian and human, face the alienation of living without their past (as time changes all things) and without those they love (as relatives and friends die). The Martian Chronicles is thus not really about Mars at all: it is about the human condition and our response to it. As the stories progress, it is clear that in this book, the human response to alienation is largely unhelpful. Bradbury’s characters deny, avoid, and repress their extreme loneliness and separation. They build huge cities, sprouting like evil fungi on an unknown planet, in order to reproduce Earth, the one Known Thing, and thus escape the great Loneliness. They cast aside all caution, all training, and all reason in order to enjoy the brief fiction that their loved ones have perhaps not died at all but still remain somewhere and will welcome them home. They kill in order to regain the sole attention of their spouse, and they crush the dreams of others in order to retain their own sense of superiority. They would destroy someone else’s child in order to have their own back again. They cover up loss, estrangement, and grief; they resist facing their own alienation and ironically increase it by seeking to destroy it. They vomit on foreign temples and dance on the dead bodies of alien beings. These examples of alienation culminate with the destruction of cultures and planets: the Martian culture is dying from within prior to the Earth invasion; the Earth invaders destroy the Martian culture and reproduce their own on Mars; the colonization of Mars fails; an atomic war destroys Earth, and the colonists see it explode before their eyes.
Yet Bradbury also gives us alternative pathways toward dealing with alienation. The answers lie in bits and pieces throughout some of the stories. They include respect and reverence for a culture other than one’s own, as exemplified by the rebel Spender and the missionary Father Peregrine. Even when the realities are so different as to defy connection, the Martian and Tomas keep to polite civilities. Some Martians manifest consistently nonviolent approaches to the colonizers, even against the multiple murders and widespread destruction committed by Sam Parkhill. One of the most positive yet horrifying stories is told through the eyes of a young teenage boy, who is made to look into the waters of an old canal and realize that he, indeed, is the Martian. Bradbury’s last chapter promises a new beginning for Mars and for the human race. It carries the seeds of its own conflict (father-son tension and too few females) as well as its own hope, as alienation is finally dealt with not in terms of denial, grasping fear, and a frenzy to duplicate the past, but rather with acceptance of loss and appreciation for what is new. Anna Minore
Love in The Martian Chronicles
Early in The Martian Chronicles, Bradbury gives us a description of failed love. In “Ylla,” Mr. and Mrs. K had once enjoyed one another’s company, in harmony with the colors of their planet and its slow movement of beauty, but they are “not happy now.” Mrs. K becomes trapped within her beautiful home. Mr. K is familiar with what she does and never does, and yet he does not truly know her. His sterile knowledge of her cannot abide secrets. Her emotions and interest come alive only in her dreams of a stranger who will come from the sky. When those dreams become reality, her husband kills that stranger. By the end of the chapter, Mrs. K doesn’t know her own feelings and is thus denied intimacy even with herself. She cries uncontrollably without knowing the reason why. Her response to her inner and outer isolation is to cry, tremble, and repeat her husband’s promise that she’ll “be all right tomorrow.” A second example of failed love occurs in “June 2001: And the Moon Be Still as Bright.” Real love
224â•…â•… Bradbury, Ray has something to do with knowledge, respect, and a deep belonging, as Spender had sensed intuitively during his first evening on Mars. Without that belonging, he explains, all naming is alien, and all touching will fall short of communion. He predicts, “No matter how we touch Mars, we’ll never touch it. And then we’ll get mad at it, and you know what we’ll do? We’ll rip it up, rip the skin off, and change it to fit ourselves.” Yet Spender’s actions illustrate his own description of failed love. He lacks a connection both to the Martian culture and to the coarse Earth culture represented by his fellow astronauts. The resultant lack of connection breeds his actions of anger, violence, and destruction. He shows us that with a failed love, violence can erupt between people and places and, as seen above with the Ks, between people and people. Bradbury also illustrates the loneliness generated by the loss of true love. It can create such a cavernous need that LaFarge in “The Martian” chooses to increase another’s loss in order to assuage his own. He stands at the balcony and consciously takes another man’s “daughter” in order to regain his “son.” This need traps the Martian Tom, tearing him apart and destroying his identity. The Martian cannot be the beloved for all people. His very responsiveness assures his destruction. And in “April 2026: The Long Years,” grief for his dead family leads Hathaway to create sophisticated substitutes to fill his loneliness. Love is a necessity. Lacking the reality of a family, he needs facsimiles in order to survive. Yet love is also powerful beyond measure. As Janice finds out in “The Wilderness,” love is all one needs to leave behind everything that one knows and take a risky one-way trip to another planet. Love can overthrow a crew of 16 men, all logical and highly trained, by immersing them in the relative nostalgia of their childhood and offering them the return of their lost loves. It overcomes training, logic, and habituation; it can destroy you or it can, as at the end of the book, seed a new world. Bradbury thus leaves us with a sense of hope. In the early part of the book, Spender stands in a ruined city, by moonlight, and pronounces that “Love itself must rest.” Throughout the book, Bradbury shows us the pause of love, both on a planetary and an interpersonal level. Yet by the end of the
book, we have come full circle. It is again nighttime, and we are in yet another ruined city. However, now the face of the boy becomes like an old Martian mask, and he is not in a dying marriage but part of a young, harmonious family, in touch with each other and the world around them. They have let go of the past (having burned their Earth maps and destroyed their rocket) and moved fully into the present with each other. They are not trying to change the planet into a replica of their past. They merge with it and allow themselves to be transformed by it, becoming the new Martians. Love is thus expanded from romantic to familial to planetary. Despite the warped foolishness, the loss, the stupidity, the violence, and the pain that characterize many human-human and human-planet interactions, Bradbury leaves us with the hope that love, like the survival of the human species, is still possible. Anna Minore
Nature in The Martian Chronicles
Nature plays a prominent role in Ray Bradbury’s The Martian Chronicles. It illustrates the vastness of the planet Mars, indicates the harmony and disharmony of the characters’ interactions with that planet, and gives the reader hints about the emotional state of the characters themselves. Bradbury thus uses his descriptions of nature as a literary technique: They are not random descriptions of a foreign planet but instead provide valuable information about the characters and their fates. For example, Bradbury’s descriptions of nature indicate the vastness of the planet. Humans are dwarfed in it. Sam Parkhill’s one lone hotdog stand is an outpost of commercialism within the dusty plains. Mr. Hathaway staves off madness by searching the huge night skies for a single red rocket flare. Jose drives along a dark country road until he feels like he is lost in time, as if time swallows him up whole along with the singing insects and the one (huge) insect he encounters bearing a Martian on its back. Time, space, and size are stretched to such huge proportions that human beings are literally lost within them. Benjamin cannot breathe properly, either because the air is too thin or because it almost drips with thick greenness. The seeds he plants grow a century’s worth of earthtime in just a few minutes.
Of Plymouth Plantationâ•…â•… 225 The miracle house of technology falls apart at the seams, like the disintegrating death of a body, as fire, wind, and heat sweep through it. Natural forces destroy the domesticated dog, the mechanical mice, and the African beasts cavorting on the walls of the children’s nursery. Tamed, artificial nature gives way to the uncontrollable forces of the planet. Bradbury’s characters cannot breathe, survive, keep track of time, or think clearly. They lose their identities; their lives; and momentarily, their sanity. They are at times completely overwhelmed by the planet itself. Yet Bradbury also uses nature in more subtle ways to indicate the emotional state of the characters in question. Flowers, often indicative of perfume, fragrance, sex and sexuality, and beauty, here contrast with the bare sterility of Mrs. K’s marriage. Sam Parkhill’s hotdog stand, located in the vastness of a dead seabed with a view of Earth on the horizon, shows his utter cultural and moral paucity. The Martians are different from us not only in their hair color and the color of their eyes, but by the fact that they are similar to forces of nature that cannot be humanized: They die like the snow, they shatter like ice, they ripple in the wind “like an image on cold water.” Thus, nature tells us something about the characters in the story: They are radically different from us, or they are hauntingly alone, or they lack richness of thought and imagination. Finally, Bradbury uses nature imagery to portray a state of harmony between the characters and the natural world. In his final chapter, a family enjoys a picnic boat ride. The children’s hands become like clams in the water, and the mother’s eyes mirror the deep pools. They are drawn toward fountains that still gush forth in the ancient cities. They see their own reflections in the water of the canal; their reflections now ripple like the bodies of the Martians in the previous chapter. They incorporate the natural world into their bodies and culture instead of defining themselves against it or destroying it. Humanity’s hope of survival lies not in importing Oregon pine from one planet to colonize another, not by making nature “better,” and not by seeking to destroy those whom we perceive as destructive, but rather by reintegrating ourselves with our environment. The Earth colonizers must become Martians if they hope to survive, and we human beings, as
evolutionary newcomers, must act as if we are a part of the planet Earth instead of colonizers of it. Anna Minore
BRADFORD, WILLIAMâ•… Of Plymouth Plantationâ•… (1630–1650; printed 1856)
Written over a period of 20 years, William Bradford’s journal has become one of the staple of American literature. The historical information alone counts for its value and place in Americana. Although Bradford (1590–1657) began writing in 1630, his account takes the reader back to the latter part of the first decade of the 1600s, when the small separatist congregation of which he was a member emigrated from England to the Netherlands. He ends his writing in 1650, when he append to his treatise a list of the people aboard the ship Mayflower. Of course, the work is more than just a collage of facts: It is Bradford’s meditative interpretation of his world. He often employs a retrospective analysis that allows him to see God’s hand in the events of the history. In this he was most influenced by the pietistic/meditative tradition in late medieval and early modern English religious experience, and by his belief that the events of history were a sort of drama replaying the master plots of the Old and New Testaments of the Bible. In fact, some scholars see Of Plymouth Plantation as being styled in the form of a Lord’s Day sermon, a particular type of oratory with which Bradford would have been especially familiar. Bradford’s 270-page manuscript was bound in vellum (prepared skin from a young calf or lamb), its covers being almost the size of a modern-day sheet of writing paper. It was lost during the Revolutionary War (1775–83), was discovered in London in the 1850s, and was first printed in 1856. The manuscript is currently housed at the State Library in the State House in Boston. Matthew Horn
Community in Of Plymouth Plantation
From the beginning of William Bradford’s youthful acquaintance with the Scrooby congregation in Yorkshire to the end of his life as governor of Plymouth Colony, community played a central role in his worldview. His community was composed of
226â•…â•… Bradford, William Protestant believers who were like-minded in what they saw as right Christian doctrine (orthodoxy) and right practice (orthopraxy). The community’s existence was warranted by the New Testament teachings of Paul in his second letter to the church in Corinth: “The body is a unit, though it is made up of many parts; and though all its parts are many, they form one body. So it is with Christ. For we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.╯.╯.╯. Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of you is a part of it” (1 Cor. 12:12–13, 27). Thus, every believer who took these words seriously—as Bradford certainly did—had an obligation to first look to the spiritual health of the overall body before looking to his or her own well-being. This mindset explains why the Scrooby congregation members were willing to make major decisions like leaving England and moving to the Netherlands and then to the New World. The issue was not that it was inconvenient for their individual members to live in England, but that if they moved together as a group, they could help themselves and thus have a convenient move to a convenient locale. Bradford makes clear at the beginning of his second chapter that there was nothing easy about the moves. He makes note of the pain of separation from their native land and the many uncertainties that await them. He says, though, that they gladly accept this challenge, because they are eager to do God’s will. This specific community moved from England to Amsterdam in order to be free to follow these ordinances as the members thought they should be followed. These same members moved from Amsterdam to Leyden so that their own community would not be corrupted by the infighting of the congregation that had been established in Amsterdam before they arrived (this is John Smith’s congregation, mentioned in chapter 3 of Bradford’s text). They moved from Leyden to the New World mainly in order to save their children from acquiring the worldly lifestyle of the Leyden inhabitants. Before this final move, the congregation had already lived in Leyden for more than a decade and had seen some of their younger members stray. The danger to
the whole group was such that they worried that all of their members could be corrupted. These incidents show that the driving passion for this group was their own unity and identity. Thus, one way for Bradford to highlight the difficulty of carrying out these moves is by emphasizing how the unity suffers during the process. For example, when the group prepares to move from England to Amsterdam, political difficulties cause a sudden rupture in the group when half of the group gets arrested on the shore while the other half sails away unwillingly under the orders of the desperate Dutch captain. And when the community begins to sail from Leyden to America, physical difficulties with the ship itself cause a good portion of the pilgrims to separate from the group and remain in Leyden, much to the distress of those who choose to remain aboard. At the end of chapter 8, Bradford seems hard put to make credible excuses for those who have decided to remain behind. In fact, by his reference to the Gideon story ( Judges 7:1–8 in the Old Testament), he implies that those who remained behind were not really part of God’s plan to populate New England in the first place. All this is not to say that the individual did not matter to Bradford. On the contrary, in Bradford’s theology, the decisions of the individual were paramount as far as an individual’s own particular spiritual condition was concerned. But once the individual made a decision toward biblical Christianity (once he or she was “in Christ”), the needs of the group—for unity, growth, edification, correction, and so on—took precedence. And Bradford the author exemplifies this stance perfectly: Throughout his narrative, he constantly refers to himself in the third person, thereby maintaining a posture that includes him as, in essence, just another part of the whole. He also overlooks personal matters that would themselves be justified in being part of the narrative—his wife’s death, for example—because he is writing the account not as a narrative of his own experience but as an account of the Community’s experiences. Matthew Horn
Identity in Of Plymouth Plantation
The fact that, in his work, William Bradford does not refer to himself in the first person but instead
Of Plymouth Plantationâ•…â•… 227 uses third-person pronouns (he, him, his, and so on) or the generic title “the Governor” says something about his notion of identity. Exactly what it says is not very clear, however. It is possible that his constant avoidance of his own name might point to his hesitancy to claim any good act as his alone, for he would hold it as an indisputable truth that God’s power and will were behind anything good happening in Plymouth. In short, this may be Bradford’s move to avoid any opportunity for pride. It is equally possible that his literary distancing from the figure of his own self signifies his desire to mirror a technique developed by some of the Old Testament and New Testament authors. Many Old Testament writers, such as Moses, Joshua, Solomon (referring to himself as “the teacher” in Ecclesiastes), and most of the major and minor prophets avoid direct reference to themselves. Similarly, the New Testament evangelists Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, when they do record their own presence, activity, or words involving incidents with Jesus, almost always refer to themselves in the third person. Of course, this is not the case with every biblical author. Paul in his weighty epistles and John in the book of Revelation constantly employ first-person pronouns. But there is enough of a precedent in the Bible to warrant the speculation that Bradford was thinking of it as his model as he wrote his manuscript over the years. The fact that he uses many biblical phrases in his writing (for instance, see his echo of Paul’s “I know whom I have believed” in the opening of his second chapter), along with purple patches of jubilant praises to God, supports this possibility. However, there is a third reason Bradford may have erased direct identification with himself and his group as completely as he did. The Protestant interpretation of Paul’s New Testament epistles to the first-century churches maintains that the individual Christian loses his own identity within the larger figures of the corporate Christian community and of Christ himself. Passages such as Paul’s 12th chapter of his first letter to the Corinthians, a chapter that establishes a fundamental likeness between the members of a Christian church and the members of a complete human body (that is to say, the members of the church all function together in order to form one organic whole, complete with
its own head, hands, feet) abound, and the phrase “in Christ,” which is often situated in phrases that place the believers themselves “in Christ,” are even more plentiful. In fact, the specific notion is that the Christian, even while still living on earth, is already occupying a place in heaven as a spectator to God’s glorious designs as they unfold in time: “And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, in order that in the coming ages he might show the incomparable riches of his grace, expressed in his kindness to us in Christ Jesus” (Ephesians 2:6–7). Bradford would have known this verse. This notion of being already seated in the heavens to watch God’s outworking of his own plan has a few ramifications pertinent to a proper reading of Of Plymouth Plantation. First, this introduces a radically passive stance that can be applied to even the supposed actors of the narrative themselves (and, ironically, to the linguistic structure of the writing— the passive voice is the predominant voice in the book). This is fully developed throughout the pages of Bradford’s story. Consider all the times Bradford describes an event in his clear, descriptive style, an event full of action and decision, only to eventually summarize the whole happening, a few paragraphs or pages later, in a way that reorients the energy and activity so that they are seen to be originating from God. A case in point is Bradford’s description in chapter 8 of how the pilgrims initially set out from Leyden to Virginia in a leaky ship. They have to turn back, cram the Mayflower with a double load of passengers, and prepare to set out again. This discourages some of the pilgrims, however, and these decide to give up the journey and stay in Leyden. Toward the very end of the chapter, Bradford says of this, “And thus, like Gedions armie [ Judges 7], this small number was devided, as if the Lord by this worke of his providence thought these few to many for the great worke he had to doe.” This is an example appearing early in Bradford’s work, and it sets the pattern for how much of the later successes and disasters (in Bradford’s term, “visitations”) are to be viewed. The act of viewing, in fact, is the major activity in which both the writer Bradford and the reader are engaged. Bradford’s story, by his own design, is
228â•…â•… Bradford, William viewed from afar, from a distance that turns the story into material for meditation. This, perhaps, hints to why Bradford first entered this information into his journal. Writing about the events distanced them from the writer and allowed him to assume the role not of a writer per se but of a meditative spectator. What was being watched in this history was the unveiling of the power of God, not the establishment of a community of pilgrims. It is fitting here to remember that the first promise the pilgrims made to themselves was that they would be a city on a hill, something the whole world could watch. Bradford’s book is his attempt to make sure that promise was fulfilled for posterity. Matthew Horn
Suffering in Of Plymouth Plantation
England during the late 1500s and early 1600s was in religious turmoil. The Church of England had separated from Roman Catholicism but still maintained many practices that looked very much like old Catholic rituals. Also, although the English no longer looked to the pope for ultimate religious authority, the English monarch and the archbishop of Canterbury claimed such an authority for themselves. People in England who did not approve of the direction the Church of England was taking began either to push for further reform while remaining in the church or to band together in small congregations or sects in order to move out from the church. William Bradford and his community belonged to this latter group. For them, the Bible was the ultimate and sole authority in religious matters, and it was to be read and interpreted by individuals for themselves. These people wanted to break with the official church, and they knew such a break would be difficult, for the Bible proclaimed that all who lived in a genuinely godly way in this world would be persecuted (2 Timothy 3:12). However, it also told them that God would completely deliver them from the fire of persecution (Isaiah 43:2) and that those who are persecuted because of righteousness would inherit the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5:10). It even said that God himself would bring suffering to the lives of his children to help them grow in grace (Hebrews 12:4–11).
Bradford and his group were therefore expecting persecution on all fronts. This is reflected in Bradford’s Of Plymouth Plantation, which immediately develops as major themes the notions of suffering for faith and of successfully enduring that suffering. In the first chapter, Bradford’s narrative points out that Satan was attacking the work of the earlier reformers in England by diluting their work and that he (Satan) was now stirring the corrupt clergy against truth-seeking congregations like the one Bradford had joined. But corrupt clergy was only one of Satan’s tools: He could use anyone who was not fully endeavoring to imitate God’s holiness. This includes religiously indifferent law officials or merchants. Thus, in the second chapter, Bradford tells of how a treacherous sea captain betrays them to the magistrates as they seek passage to Holland and of how, a year later, the law officers arrest at least half of the group as the congregation seeks a second escape. Evil men will be described throughout the narrative to highlight this sort of persecution. Suffering also comes from a more subtle enemy: the circumstances caused by the pilgrims’ struggle to survive economically. This is seen in Plymouth Plantation’s experiences caused by intense pressures of its property management, its commitments to its financiers, and its trading with Native Americans, but it is first seen in the pilgrims’ stay at Holland and Leyden (as described in chapters 3 and 4). Here the world creeps into the life of the holy congregation, causing some to turn away after material gain, some to age prematurely through overwork, and some to lose their children to the city’s alluring heathenism. This convinces the pilgrims that although they are not in physical danger from the authorities, their faith is still in enough danger to justify a move to the Americas, where they can isolate themselves from the corroding influences of an unholy civilization. Underlying these accounts of persecution is the idea that for their own good, God is allowing his children to suffer. This is the view taken especially for horrific events such as the storms at sea that the pilgrims endure during their travels to Holland and to America, and the sickness and famine they experience in the New World. The operative phrases here are “It pleased the Lord” and “general visitation,” both alluding to God’s plans and doings.
Jane Eyreâ•…â•… 229 These phrases help remind the pilgrims that suffering is not meaningless. Instead, it is full of promise: God is close to his own and is giving them just the right amount of suffering to draw them closer to him. Because of this belief, Bradford could “make a pause” to look out at the New World for the first time and describe not only its ominous, hard, cold look but also God’s absolute goodness in protecting his own (chapter 9). Much later, after the plantation has been established, Bradford will reflect on the sufferings God has brought them through and will begin to view Plymouth Plantation as a place where migrating pilgrims can rest and become refreshed in order to gather strength for their own forthcoming sufferings. Matthew Horn
BRONTË, CHARLOTTEâ•… Jane Eyreâ•… (1847)
Charlotte Brontë’s story is of an orphan, Jane Eyre, who is ill-treated by her aunt, Mrs. Reed, and is sent to a boarding school, where her best friend, Helen Burns, dies of consumption. Jane grows up to be a governess for Adele Varens, ward of Edward Rochester of Thornfield Hall. During her sojourn at Thornfield Hall, there are attempts on Rochester’s and Richard Mason’s lives. While Jane suspects Grace Poole, a servant, the mystery is solved when Mason thwarts Rochester and Jane’s wedding: The culprit was Bertha, Rochester’s first wife and Mason’s sister, a madwoman hidden in the attic. To avoid becoming Rochester’s mistress, Jane flees and almost dies of extreme hunger and exhaustion. She is rescued by Mary, Diana, and St. John Rivers, only to discover that they are her cousins. Their mutual uncle, John Eyre, has left Jane a fortune, which she shares with her cousins. Independent, she returns to Rochester to learn that Bertha has set fire to Thornfield Hall and in an attempt to save Bertha, Rochester has lost a hand, an eye, and his eyesight. Ten years on, Jane tells the readers of her happy marriage to Rochester: She has given birth to a son, and Rochester has regained some of his sight. The novel is intricately complex: It borrows, alludes, and lends itself to many readings. Many motifs from the gothic genre, such as Bertha sucking Mason’s blood
like a vampire, are incorporated into the narrative, which includes allusions to the Bible, fairy tales, John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress (1678), and John Milton’s Paradise Lost (1667). Jane Eyre has also inspired other writings, such as Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca (1938) and Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea (1966). Aaron Ho
Education in Jane Eyre
Jane Eyre is a novel of education. After an altercation with her aunt, Mrs. Reed, Jane is sent to Lowood School, which was modeled after the Clergy Daughter’s School at Cowan Bridge where Charlotte Brontë had studied and lost two of her sisters, Marie and Elizabeth, to consumption. Like the Clergy Daughter’s School, Lowood is badly run by a clergyman, Mr. Brocklehurst. The students at Lowood are often starved, as the food is either burnt or scanty; they wear ill-fitting clothes because their cheap and scarce needles break easily; even in the coldest winter, they have to walk two miles to Brocklebridge Church on Sundays. The austere living conditions stem from Mr. Brocklehurst’s convictions that a frugal existence would improve “the spiritual edification of the pupils, by encouraging them to evince fortitude under the temporary privation.” However, his misguided beliefs do not apply to his wife and daughters, who are splendidly decked out in ermine, silk, velvet, and beaver hats with ostrich plumes. Mr. Brocklehurst is not the only one who mistreats the children. Mrs. Scatcherd, a schoolteacher, is depicted as mean and unreasonable, especially to Helen Burns, Jane’s best friend. Although Helen is brilliant, Mrs. Scatcherd sends her to the bottom of the class. Even when Helen is seated in an obscure corner of the class, Mrs. Scatcherd constantly picks on her. When Helen answers the questions her classmates cannot, not only does Mrs. Scatcherd not praise Helen, she flogs her for being disagreeable and dirty. However, Helen does not suffer for long. The summer wind blows typhus into the poorly ventilated school, and more than half of the students fall ill. The virulent atmosphere, coupled with semistarvation and neglected colds, hasten Helen’s death from consumption. Fortunately, hers and
230â•…â•… Brontë, Charlotte other victims’ deaths are not in vain: Their demises bring the school to public scrutiny. Although Mr. Brocklehurst is not discharged, a few gentlemen are roped in to aid him in his duties, transforming the school into a better institution. In a nurturing environment, with the encouragement and cultivation of Miss Temple, the headmistress of Lowood, Jane blossoms: She excels in her studies and becomes a teacher in Lowood and, later, a governess for Adele Varens, ward of Edward Rochester. Not only is Jane able to earn her own living, she is also inwardly changed. Through education, she manages to control the hysteria she previously manifested to Mrs. Reed when she was 10. Such is Jane’s transformation that, as an adult, she readily forgives Mrs. Reed on her deathbed, even though the woman had mistreated Jane. In addition to Jane, other female characters are also improved by education. When Jane suspects that Rochester might tempt her to be his mistress, she leaves him without taking a penny. On the verge of collapsing from extreme exhaustion and starvation, she chances upon the Rivers’s cottage. When Jane sees Mary and Diana, her long-lost cousins, through a window poring over a book, she knows they will be willing to help her. It is not coincidental that Diana and Mary are kind and learned; education instills in one a sense of righteousness. The influence of an educated upbringing is so powerful that it can also overcome what nature gave to Adele. Adele has inherited the faults of her vain and materialistic French mother, but “a sound English education corrected in a great measure [Adele’s] French defects.” While the women in the novel undertake a secular education in embroidery, music, art, and languages, the men’s education is of a spiritual nature. St. John Rivers, Diana and Mary’s brother, learns Hindi for his missionary work in India. For Rochester, his spiritual education comes from his sufferings. Only after his estate is lost and he is maimed and blinded does he start praying. It is one of his prayers that brings Jane back to him: When Jane is deliberating over St. John’s marriage proposal, she hears Mr. Rochester’s prayer, even though they are miles apart. Education is an important theme in Jane Eyre. The novel criticizes the abominable way many
schools were run in the 1800s, but it also shows that if they were run properly, schools had the potential to develop students of intellectual and moral distinction like Jane and Adele. Aaron Ho
Gender in Jane Eyre
Although Jane Eyre is not the first feminist manifesto, it is provocative for the Victorian period as it advocates equality between the sexes. For instance, after Jane Eyre has moved into Thornfield as a governess, she is restless because she has no intellectual equal. Her two companions are Adele Varens, a child, and Mrs. Fairfax, a kind but dull housekeeper. Women of the time are generally regarded as calm and resigned to their fate, but Jane argues that “women feel just as men feel; they need exercise for their faculties and a field for their efforts as much as their brothers do.╯.╯.╯. It is narrow minded in their more privileged fellow-creatures [men] to say that they ought to confine themselves to making puddings and knitting stockings, to playing on the piano and embroidering bags.” It is, however, not easy to achieve gender equality in the Victorian patriarchal society. Jane is constantly being put down by men—Mr. Brocklehurst, Edward Rochester, and St. John Rivers. Mr. Brocklehurst is the clergyman in charge of Lowood School, where Jane studies from ages 10 to 18. His philosophy in education is for the students to live a frugal and severe existence so that they can gain spiritual fortitude; the girls are therefore taught to deny and stifle their natural instincts, and as a result, they are often starved and cold. Because of semistarvation, neglected colds, and poor conditions of the school ground, many of the students fall ill and die. Mr. Brocklehurst’s dictatorial powers are greatly diminished when several gentlemen are roped in to ensure the school’s proper running. Like Mr. Brocklehurst, St. John advocates selfabnegation. Unlike the hypocritical Brocklehurst, however, St. John practices what he preaches. He proposes to Jane even though he does not love her; as a missionary, he chooses Jane because she has the right qualities to be a missionary’s wife. He expects Jane to deny her natural instincts—for she does not love him, either—in order to serve God. Even
Jane Eyreâ•…â•… 231 though Jane rejects his proposal at least three times, he refuses to take no for an answer. Partly to escape St. John’s harassing and oppression and partly to answer Rochester’s call, Jane furtively leaves Moor House, the Rivers’s cottage. While Mr. Brocklehurst oppresses Jane through bodily privation and St. John through emotional distress, Rochester oppresses her through material objects. He buys her clothes and jewelry in a symbolic attempt to “own” her, and he says to her, “I mean shortly to claim you—your thoughts, conversation and company—for life.” She detests the way he treats her as if he were a sultan bestowing gifts on a slave. She rebels against him, saying she will not wear the dresses he has bought and will go on being a governess and maintaining the habits of a governess before the marriage. However, the marriage plans fall apart after Rochester reveals that he is already married. Jane has to run away because she is afraid he might claim her as a mistress. When she returns, however, she is of an equal status with Rochester. They are compatible physically for he is blind and maimed and she is a woman (one has to bear in mind this novel was written in the 1800s), but she is also financially independent after receiving an inheritance from a long-lost uncle. Their eventual marriage is one between equals. Jane Eyre is also a novel of women oppressing women. As a child, Jane is abused by her aunt, Mrs. Reed, for no apparent reason, except perhaps that Mr. Reed appears to favor Jane. At Lowood, Mrs. Scatcherd constantly picks on Helen Burns, Jane’s friend, for being dirty even though it is impossible to wash up in the freezing water and that Helen is one of the more intelligent students. At Thornfield Hall, Grace Poole is employed as the caretaker and warden of Bertha, Rochester’s first wife; Grace keeps Bertha under lock and key. One of the reasons that Mrs. Fairfax disapproves of Jane and Rochester’s marriage is because Jane is of a lower class than Rochester. When Jane leaves Thornfield Hall to avoid becoming Rochester’s mistress, she is refused entry to the Moor House by the housekeeper, Hannah, even though she is on the brink of collapse from hunger and fatigue. Hence, not only do the men oppress women, women are oppressing each other.
Still, the main narrative revolves around the oppression of Jane by men. In order to escape from the oppression, she has to play by the rules in Lowood under Mr. Brocklehurst’s reign; reject and run away from St. John; and return to Rochester as an equal. The fact that Rochester has to be both blind and maimed for Jane to be treated as an equal attests to the lowly status of Victorian women. Aaron Ho
Love in Jane Eyre
Love is never simple in Jane Eyre. Despite knowing that his wife dislikes Jane Eyre, Mr. Reed, Jane’s uncle, on his deathbed, elicits a promise from Mrs. Reed that she will treat Jane as one of her own children. As a result of Mr. Reed’s love and kind intentions, however, Jane grows up in an abusive environment: The Reeds make Jane understand perfectly that she is living on their charity. Perhaps it is such a mentality—that love equates to suffering—that Jane brings with her to Lowood, a boarding school she is sent to after an altercation with Mrs. Reed. At Lowood, she meets two persons she will come to love: Helen Burns, a fellow student, and Miss Temple, the headmistress who will turn Jane into a schoolteacher. The association of love with suffering is again prominent in a conversation Jane has with Helen. Jane says, “To gain some real affection from you, or Miss Temple, or an other whom I truly love, I would willingly submit to have the bone of my arm broken, or to let a bull toss me, or to stand behind a kicking horse, and let it dash its hoof at my chest.” Helen, however, disavows the great importance Jane puts on secular love; she believes in a religious love that acts as a philosophy for her immense tolerance. In school, Helen is constantly picked on by Mrs. Scatcherd. Even when she is able to answer questions her classmates cannot, Mrs. Scatcherd does not praise her; instead, she flogs Helen for being disagreeable and dirty. Helen’s love for a divine being makes her believe that she has to put up with her fate, for if God acknowledges her innocence, he will separate the “spirit from [the] flesh to crown us with a full reward” (59). While Helen is moderate in her religious love, St. John Rivers, Jane’s cousin, is a zealot. St. John
232â•…â•… Brontë, Emily believes that it is God’s bidding that he become a missionary in India. Because of his belief in his destiny, and because he places God’s love above all things, he lives in self-abnegation. He ignores Rosamond Oliver, a pretty but fragile girl whom he loves, and proposes to Jane, whom he does not love. While Jane is tempted to accept St. John’s proposal, she chooses a secular love in the end. Across many miles, she hears Edward Rochester’s cry, which stops her from accepting St. John’s proposal. When Jane returns to Rochester, the equilibrium of their relationship has shifted. Previously, Rochester had wielded the power as he was older, rich, experienced, and her employer. He withheld truths from her, and after she had accepted his proposal, he said to her, “I mean shortly to claim you—your thoughts, conversation and company—for life.” In a symbolic move to own Jane, he had bought her dresses and jewels. His “smile was such as a sultan might .╯.╯. bestow on a slave his gold and gems had enriched.” However, in a fire, Rochester lost his limb and his eyesight, and it is while he is in such a broken and devastated state that Jane returns to him. Rochester has lost his cocksureness and superiority; he is now crippled and blind, and he needs to be guided. On the other hand, Jane has more experience in the world, and she has become financially independent due to an inheritance from an unknown uncle. Despite her plain looks, she is clearly capable of attracting handsome and upright men such as St. John. In the first proposal, Rochester was so confident that Jane would accept him that he taunted her mercilessly about a lady who showed interest in him till Jane cried. In the second proposal, after his accident, he is the one on the edge. Jane Eyre does not, however, advocate a love of tug-of-war. Jane returns to Rochester as an equal, not a superior. She guides him on his walks, but she also listens to his commands: she is equally his master and his slave. It is this equality in status that allows Jane and Rochester to be happily married. Unlike the religious love that requires one to suffer, and unlike the secular love Jane was enslaved by with Helen and Miss Temple, Jane and Rochester’s romantic love is now liberating, as Jane claims in the penultimate chapter: “There was no harassing
restraint, no pressing of glee and vivacity with him; for with him I was at perfect ease.” Aaron Ho
BRONTË, EMILYâ•… Wuthering Heightsâ•… (1847)
Wuthering Heights—one of the best known love stories in English literature—has spawned an entire industry of films, television series, musicals, and songs over many decades, not to mention innumerable literary editions and criticism, seemingly able to attract generation after generation of new admirers. The story concerns the relationship of Heathcliff and Catherine: Their passion for each other is allconsuming, yet it remains unfulfilled, ultimately destroying them both and those nearest to them. The novel is not, however, “just” a romance but a serious essay, addressing a number of themes and issues via the presentation of two of the most famous characters in the canon of Victorian literature. The nature of love is discussed, together with male/ female relationships in general and gender roles in society; the notion of death and dying, the afterlife; social class divisions and their importance in society, incorporating poverty and wealth; the abuse of women and children; and revenge and reconciliation. “Wuthering Heights” refers to the name of the manor house set on the wild Yorkshire moors in England, the location for much of the plot. The story was written by Emily Brontë in 1847, age 29, only a year before she died. It was published under the pseudonym Ellis Bell, since Victorian sensibilities could not countenance such a profoundly shocking novel (for the time) being written by a woman. Even today, readers may find the novel disturbing, and many of its themes remain relevant to a modern world. Gerri Kimber
Death in Wuthering Heights
Of the 13 characters introduced in the novel Wuthering Heights, excluding servants and the two narrators, 11 are dead by the end, nearly all prematurely. Emily Brontë’s own life was ravaged by the untimely death of loved ones, and this experience inevitably surfaced in her fiction. Her mother died when Emily
Wuthering Heightsâ•…â•… 233 was three, and two older sisters died when she was seven; she herself would die of tuberculosis by the age of 30. In the early 19th century, this was not uncommon—life expectancy was short—but for a modern reader, so many premature deaths are difficult to comprehend. Death as a theme in this novel is therefore of paramount importance. For the characters, it is frequently viewed as either a punishment for earthly wrongdoing or a merciful release from pain and suffering. The deaths of certain characters also aid the plot and provide narrative structure to a densely woven novel. Some of the dead even reappear as ghosts, both at the beginning and at the end of the novel, death seemingly bringing no release to the tortured souls in Wuthering Heights. The first death is that of Mrs. Earnshaw, mother to Catherine and her older brother, Hindley. Mr Earnshaw cares more for the foundling Heathcliff than for his own children, and this creates deepseated resentment in Hindley, who moves away. Mr Earnshaw then dies, leaving Catherine an orphan, alongside Heathcliff. Her brother returns to look after them, bringing a wife, Frances, who “felt so afraid of dying!” and who then proceeds to do just that a year later, after giving birth to a son, Hareton. The parents of Edgar and Isabella Linton, who live close by, both die from a fever also caught by Catherine. In their turbulent, passionate, yet unconsummated love affair, both Heathcliff and Catherine use the notion of death or dying continually within their lexicon of love. Catherine says, “I wish I could hold you .╯.╯. till we were both dead.” Heathcliff, in turn, cannot contemplate life without Catherine, thinking, “What kind of living will it be when you—oh, God! would you like to live with your soul in the grave?” Catherine dies two hours after giving birth to a daughter. Her husband Edgar’s sorrow and pain are overwhelming, yet dignified: “His young and fair features were almost as deathlike as those of the form beside him, and almost as fixed; but his was the hush of exhausted anguish, and hers of perfect peace.” Conversely, Heathcliff ’s reaction to the death of his soulmate is one of anger and bitterness: “Catherine Earnshaw, may you not rest as long as I am living!
You said I killed you—haunt me, then!” Her death leads him further down the path of self-destruction, transgressing the boundaries of acceptable behavior and leaving the reader unable to sympathize with his position. In direct contrast to Edgar’s restraint and dignity, Heathcliff opens Catherine’s coffin to look upon his lost love. Edgar’s sister, Isabella, who becomes Heathcliff ’s wife, dies 12 years after giving birth to their son, Linton, who in his turn dies at age 17, not long after his arranged marriage to Cathy, Catherine’s daughter. Hindley dies a mere six months after Catherine, drinking himself to death, unable to come to terms with the death of his wife. Edgar eventually dies when Cathy is 17, followed less than a year later by Heathcliff. On his deathbed, Edgar declares to Cathy: “↜‘I am going to [Catherine]; and you, darling child, shall come to us!’ .╯.╯. None could have noticed the exact minute of his death, it was so entirely without a struggle.” Heathcliff would rather Catherine was present as a ghost than not present at all. At the beginning of the novel, Catherine’s ghost appears at Wuthering Heights, begging to be allowed through the bedroom window. Heathcliff ’s dead body is found by the same window: “The lattice [window], flapping to and fro, had grazed one hand that rested on the sill.” Heathcliff is buried next to Catherine as he had requested, his hope being that in death, their bodies will conjoin, as they never did while alive, with the body of Edgar on her other side—a macabre ménage à trois. Nelly makes the claim that people have seen the ghosts of Heathcliff and Cathy walking the moors. Thus, the theme of death underpins the passionate relationship between Heathcliff and Catherine—their union ultimately transcending death itself. Gerri Kimber
Gender in Wuthering Heights
The roles of men and women in Wuthering Heights frequently defy the social conventions of the day. While the men superficially appear to have power and authority over the women in their lives, the women are, nevertheless, frequently the strongest characters in any given situation, with the will and ability to alter the lives and fortunes of the male
234â•…â•… Brontë, Emily characters in their circle. Brontë uses the novel’s isolated setting to symbolically highlight the fact that most women at that time lived in a cultural “wasteland.” Brontë reveals several times in this novel that women tended to be self-educated, since it was not considered necessary—or even desirable—to spend money on their education: “[Heathcliff ] struggled long to keep up an equality with Catherine in her studies.” Catherine’s mentality is that of a girl superior to those around her: “She esteemed herself a woman, and our mistress.” She learns to play her love rivals, Edgar Linton and Heathcliff, off one another: “Though I humour both, I think a smart chastisement might improve them all the same.” The character traits that Brontë gives her are much more indicative of early 19th-century conventional masculinity than a typical female from the same era. Even Heathcliff, who believes himself to have been badly treated by Catherine, states, “I seek no revenge on you.╯.╯.╯. The tyrant grinds down his slaves and they don’t turn against him; they crush those beneath them.” This sentence explains much of Heathcliff ’s subsequent brutish behavior in the novel. Rather than taking revenge on Catherine for her perceived misdemeanors toward himself, he instead takes his revenge on others around her. Although her heart belongs to Heathcliff, Catherine understands that her place in society will only be assured if she marries someone with position and wealth, and Heathcliff has neither. Brontë is reminding us that at the time she was writing, a woman was only as socially prominent as her husband. A “good” marriage was therefore essential in order to be able to command respect in society and gain power. Heathcliff ’s treatment of his wife, Isabella (whom he married purely for revenge), is cruel in the extreme: “He seized, and thrust her from the room.╯.╯.╯. ‘I have no pity! I have no pity! The more the worms writhe, the more I yearn to crush out their entrails!’↜” Once she is dead, he calls her “a wicked slut.” Cathy, the daughter of Catherine and Edgar, is very much spoiled by her doting widower father (whose character is presented in direct contrast to Heathcliff ’s): “She who was always ‘love,’
and ‘darling,’ and ‘queen,’ and ‘angel,’ with everybody at the Grange.” A more comfortable relationship between the genders comes at the end of the novel between Cathy and Hareton, her rough, uneducated cousin: “He had been content with daily labour and rough animal enjoyments till she crossed his path. Shame at her scorn, and hope of her approval, were his first prompters to higher pursuits.” Cathy takes the lead in this relationship, showing her cousin that they might have a future together. She teaches him to read: “His brightening mind brightened his features, and added spirit and nobility to their aspect.” Brontë dwells significantly on the importance of education for both men and women throughout the novel, with a particular focus on reading, since this was the main route to self-education in her day. Hope for the future, says Brontë, rests in egalitarian relationships as exemplified by Cathy and Hareton, with mutual understanding, respect, and trust; the blind passions of the previous generation of lovers in the novel lead only to unhappiness and destruction. Incorporated within the broad theme of gender are discussions on love and marriage, education, wealth, and the ownership of property. Brontë herself was a victim of this patriarchal society she describes. Wuthering Heights was first published under the male-sounding pseudonym Ellis Bell, since publication of such a dark and difficult novel by a woman would have been impossible in an overwhelmingly male-dominated literary culture. In addition, many of the novel’s themes, specifically those relating to the issues of gender, were not acceptable topics for a female writer, nor was it deemed appropriate for a woman to challenge the rules of the society in which she lived. This is, of course, a foreign concept for today’s reader. Gerri Kimber
Love in Wuthering Heights
Wuthering Heights is renowned as one of the greatest love stories in English literature. The relationship between Heathcliff and Catherine Earnshaw— unconsummated and bizarrely unerotic—is difficult, dangerous, and illicit, wreaking havoc on both the protagonists’ lives and the lives of those around them. This is not a love for the fainthearted.
“My Last Duchess”â•…â•… 235 Early on in the novel, we learn that even as a child, “[Catherine] was much too fond of Heathcliff. The greatest punishment we could invent for her was to keep her separate from him.” An obsessive relationship develops between these two young people. one (Heathcliff ) an illegitimate foundling; the other (Catherine) motherless and neglected, both brought up in the same house (alongside Catherine’s brother, Hindley). The resulting passionate relationship between, in effect, two siblings, sits uneasily with 20th-century sensibilities. Heathcliff ’s love for Catherine is a never-ending obsession, down to the tiniest detail. In his growing jealousy at the amount of time Catherine is spending with his love rival, Edgar Linton, he remarks: “[L]ook at the almanack on that wall.╯.╯.╯. The crosses are for the evenings you have spent with the Lintons, the dots for those spent with me.” Catherine’s eventual marriage to Edgar, purely for financial and social reasons, destroys Heathcliff to the extent that he disappears for three years. This is the pivotal event in the novel—Catherine’s choice of Edgar over Heathcliff—and the rest of the novel’s tragic denouement hangs on this choice. Although Catherine has achieved her goal of marriage to Edgar, she nevertheless confides to her servant, Nelly: “Whatever our souls are made of, [Heathcliff ’s] and mine are the same.╯.╯.╯. Nelly, I am Heathcliff.” Edgar is, of course, completely infatuated with the exotic and beautiful Catherine, and he “believed himself the happiest man alive on the day he led her to Gimmerton chapel.” Heathcliff, however, cannot stay away for ever. His addiction to Catherine draws him back, and their obsessive love will ultimately lead to both their deaths. His meeting with Catherine (in the presence of Edgar) leads to the pair of them being “too much absorbed in their mutual joy to suffer embarrassment.” Even more disastrously, Edgar’s sister, Isabella, now develops “a sudden and irresistible attraction towards [Heathcliff ].” Heathcliff charms Isabella into marriage, to the horror of both Edgar and Catherine, and then abuses her both emotionally and physically, in revenge for Edgar having married Catherine. The emotional swings of Catherine’s love for Heathcliff result in her becoming desperately ill.
Heathcliff contrives one last meeting: “[He] gathered her to him with greedy jealousy .╯.╯. covering her with frantic caresses.” Catherine’s death, following the premature birth of her daughter by Edgar (also Catherine, known as Cathy), renders Heathcliff almost insane with sorrow: “He dashed his head against the knotted trunk; and, lifting up his eyes, howled, not like a man, but like a savage beast getting goaded to death with knives and spears.” In his obsession, his refusal to let go, he has, in effect, murdered his love. His mania becomes even more entrenched, leading him at one point to have Catherine’s body exhumed in a disturbing scene bordering on necrophilia. His manic desire for revenge means he is never fully able to forgive Catherine for marrying Edgar, and this will ultimately lead him to attempt to ruin the life of her daughter, Cathy. Meanwhile, poor Isabella comes to the chilling understanding that Heathcliff married her only in revenge: “I gave him my heart, and he took and pinched it to death; and flung it back to me.” Both Heathcliff and Edgar eventually die of broken hearts, unable to reconcile themselves to Catherine’s death. As if to bring the story full circle, Brontë presents us finally with the possibility of true love and happiness within a relationship—that between the two cousins, Cathy and Hareton (the son of Catherine’s dead brother, Hindley), “one loving and desiring to esteem, and the other loving and desiring to be esteemed.” There is no grand passion here, but no violence, either. The novel is a stark warning against the former, and, in Hareton and Cathy’s reasoned and gentle love, it promotes the latter as the only sane way to live. In this way, Wuthering Heights can be seen to be not so much a “love story” but, rather, an investigation into romantic love, comprising a discourse on social conventions, blind passion, violence, jealousy, and revenge, together with the notion of good versus evil. Gerri Kimber
BROWNING, ROBERTâ•… “My Last Duchess”â•… (1842)
First published as “I, Italy” in a collection called Dramatic Lyrics (1842), Robert Browning’s “My Last Duchess” was given its present title in 1849
236â•…â•… Browning, Robert when it was reprinted in Dramatic Romances and Lyrics. Among his best-loved and most widely anthologized works, the poem exemplifies what modern critics have termed the dramatic monologue, a poetic genre in which a speaker, addressing a silent auditor, gradually discloses depths of his own character and psychology to which he himself may well be blind. Indeed, Browning (1812–89) worked extensively with this form and is typically recognized as having produced its finest examples. Set during the early modern period in Italy, the poem takes the shape of a courtly address by a highranking nobleman in dowry negotiations with the agent of his lesser-born prospective second fatherin-law. Standing on the staircase of the ducal palace, the two pause as the duke draws a curtain revealing a painting of his first, late wife. The highly measured and imperiously delivered monologue that unfolds systematically exposes the duke’s extreme jealousy and possessiveness and their role in his decision to have her killed. Only the duke appears unaware of the implications of his conduct. The reader—and presumably the reader’s surrogate, the emissary— grows increasingly uncomfortable as the duke elaborates his confession, a confession that doubles, of course, as a threatening declaration of expectations for his bride-to-be. It is the count’s “fair daughter’s self ” for which the duke is bargaining, and her complete servility that he demands. In its ironic self-elaboration and psychological disclosure, the duke’s address allows Browning to explore themes of excessive individual pride, gendered power and violence, and social class. Hilary Englert
Death in “My Last Duchess”
Robert Browning’s dramatic monologue “My Last Duchess” features an early modern Italian nobleman’s unapologetic (if tense) account of the death of his late wife by his own orders. The actual murder— the event one might have expected to produce the poem’s greatest dramatic effect—is recounted in so quiet and elliptical a way as to nearly elude a hasty reader. On the heels of a litany of petty complaints against his high-spirited, lower-born late wife, the duke confesses: “I gave commands / then all smiles stopped” (ll. 45–46). Convinced that her execution
was justified and that he has conducted himself in keeping with the prerogatives of his rank, the duke nonetheless emphasizes his distance from the material act itself. His physical remove from the killing is echoed by the euphemistic subtlety with which he recounts the event. As he implies later in the poem, to have committed murder with his own hands would have been too dirty and demeaning to himself, and he makes it clear from the outset that he “choose[s] / Never to stoop” (ll. 42–43). The duke’s conspicuous unwillingness to revisit the moment of the duchess’s death with any kind of clarity, directness, or detail further reflects his refusal to stoop. It is in the gaps left by this refusal that the drama of the duke’s psychology unfolds. The poem’s first couplet faintly registers the duchess’s death, as the duke and his interlocutor, an emissary representing to the duke’s lesser-ranking future father-in-law, gaze upon a painting of her, “Looking as if she were alive” (l.2). Toward the close of the monologue, as though haunted by the lifelike impression left by the painting, the duke retraces that impression in the very same words: “There she stands / As if alive” (ll. 46–47). In its verisimilitude, the image manages to create the effect of realness, the sense that a live woman “stands” stationary within its frame. Indeed, the duke repeats this formulation as well, declaring the “piece .╯.╯. a wonder, now .╯.╯. and there she stands” (ll. 2–5). Presumably, the work is a “wonder” because it is so lifelike. But the duke’s nervous repetition also, if unwittingly, points to the representational complexity of the scene: The image of the duchess in the painting stands in for the wife as well as standing for her, and in this sense, too, it signals a wonder, a strange and surprising power exercised from beyond the grave. In capturing “the depth and passion of [the duchess’s] earnest glance” (l.8), the painting on the wall serves to recall the live woman whom it represents. It also—in some cases apparently quite threateningly—reminds its beholder of the duke’s power and readiness to end life. Surely, in disrupting the dowry negotiations for his bride-to-be with an account of the violent end met by his former wife, the duke makes this threat pointedly. The portrait signifies both the life and death of the late duchess, as well as the duke’s megalomaniacal ambition
“My Last Duchess”â•…â•… 237 to control both. At the same time, it defies both death and the duke’s power. In jealously reserving the right to alternately obscure and reveal the image—”none puts by / The curtain I have drawn for you, but I” (ll. 9–10)—the duke simultaneously displays his power and betrays its limitations. As he seems painfully aware, the demonstration of his authority and command relies on the exhibition of the painting, however selective and guarded. And yet, it is precisely at the moment of its viewing that the painting strips the duke of this control. He may open and close the curtain, but he cannot define, guarantee, or alter the portrait’s visual effects. He cannot prevent the image from smiling or this smile from eliciting pleasure in even the lowliest of spectators. Even as he keeps and shows the portrait as a monument to his own dominion, it defies him in memorializing the duchess’s unruly affections; her pleasures, her autonomy, and will; and, most important, others’ responses to her, her smiles, and all they might represent. The portrait commemorates her death but also conditions the possibility for her to communicate as though from the grave, to smile behind the curtain, to defy his will, to subvert rather than reflecting or contributing to his command. If it is only in death that the duke manages to turn his duchess into a “piece” (l. 3), an “object” (l. 3), and a “wonder” (l. 3), so too is it in death that her power and will persist. Hilary Englert
Pride in “My Last Duchess”
The duke’s narrative, which features descriptions of his late wife’s shortcomings and his complicated and ultimately murderous response to them, reveals— however obliquely—more about his psychology than about her character. As he gradually exposes his own unreliability as a narrator, the duke demonstrates a coldheartedness, a capacity for cruelty, and an exceptionally jealous sensibility. These characteristics, however, merely serve the major element of his psychology: an imperious, authoritarian pride, which blinds him to the features of his own character that the reader is invited to find so chillingly compelling. It is to legitimate his own excessive pride that the duke shares the story of his former wife’s demise. Expecting sympathy from his future father-in-law’s
emissary (a silent surrogate for the reader), he elaborates the late duchess’s capital offense: While she was alive, she neglected to evince more joy and gratitude at the duke’s “favour” (l. 25) than in the presence of “The dropping of the daylight in the West” (l. 26) or in response to a servant’s offering of a “bough of cherries” (l. 27). He reexperiences the indignity as he exclaims in disbelief, “Sir, ’twas all one!” (l. 25). In casting the same “approving” “smile” on all (ll. 30, 43), in equating his “gift of a nine-hundredyears-old name” with “anybody’s gift” (ll. 33, 34), the duchess has committed the one transgression that the duke cannot address without exacerbating the injury to himself. The duchess’s leveling attentions embarrassed him and compromised his supremacy. Yet to have complained would have been whining; to have exhibited anger—or worse, negotiated for higher regard—would have been to acknowledge vulnerability to the smallest of insults. The duke is painfully conscious of the paradox as he struggles to articulate the dilemma he faced: Who’d stoop to blame This sort of trifling? Even had you skill In speech—(which I have not)—to make your will Quite clear to such an one .╯.╯. if she let Herself be lessoned so, nor plainly set Her wits to yours, forsooth, and made excuse, —E’en then would be some stooping, and I choose Never to stoop. (ll. 34–43) The halting pauses and awkward, anxious breaks here dramatize the duke’s struggle to exert his will within the parameters of a mode of expression and a code of conduct both severely limited by aristocratic propriety and exorbitant self-regard. His parenthetical reminder that he is the only one authorized to remove the curtain and thereby reveal the duchess’s image—”(since none puts by / The curtain I have drawn for you, but I [ll. 9–10])”— serves as a metaphor for and privileged instance of this struggle. The duke must work tirelessly to demonstrate and reinforce his power but remain careful to conceal this labor behind a facade of confident
238â•…â•… Browning, Robert nonchalance. He must assert his prerogatives, but he must do so discreetly, indirectly, and above all gracefully. Accordingly, he is forced to reveal the painting in order to communicate his threats and expectations, but he must appear to do so as a simple gesture of courtly hospitality. Orders to sit down, stand up, look here and there, to listen silently and then retire are rendered as polite invitations: “Will’t please you sit and look at her?” (l. 5); “Will’t please you rise?” (l. 47). He refers to his control over the painting’s veil as an aside, but one that feels gratuitous and deliberate. In actuality, the duke’s dignified solicitousness in these moments rings false and increasingly undermines the point he seeks to make: that his authority is natural, inevitable, in no need of safeguarding or of self-conscious assertion. The occasion for the monologue is, as we know, a mediated dowry negotiation with a lesser nobleman whose family will be honored by the proposed match with the duke. While the duke—presumably correctly—takes for granted that the count will pay any price he deigns to exact, he assures the count’s agent that the monetary arrangement is a secondary consideration. Rather, he urges the emissary to understand that it is the count’s “fair daughter’s self ” he considers his “object” (ll. 52, 53). Of course, he uses the word advisedly—his objective in the negotiations is to secure a new wife, but he will not settle for anything less than complete servility and reverence from her. He intends her to function as an “object” of his will and slave to his pride, no different from any of his possessions—exemplified by the statue of “Neptune .╯.╯. Taming a sea-horse, thought a rarity, / Which Claus of Innsbruck cast in bronze for [him]!” (ll. 54–56)—the priceless works of art, in other words, that he has commissioned from the most celebrated artists of the age and which he proudly displays as monuments to his vanity and the absoluteness of his power. Hilary Englert
Tradition in “My Last Duchess”
In both form and content, “My Last Duchess” negotiates ideas about social, cultural, and political tradition. Its poetic form is one of the most traditional, celebrated, and rule-governed of the early modern Anglo tradition—that of heroic couplets (rhyming
couplets of iambic pentameter). In its metrical regularity and rhyme scheme, it establishes an unnerving steadiness and calm as the tonal backdrop to the narrative confession of a speaker who nonetheless gradually emerges as a megalomaniacal killer. As the speaker of this poem unconsciously reveals his character and psychology, he positions himself quite starkly in relation to the tradition of his ancient lineage, thematically echoing the poem’s form. It is in relation to the social forms associated with the titled aristocracy of early modern Europe that the duke comports himself. It is an anxious, all-consuming will to protect and preserve these traditions, coupled with an excessive self-regard— perhaps the logical extension of the aristocratic personality—that account for the duke’s conduct and attitude throughout the poem. The poem recalls the traditions of a feudal social order in which birth and ancestry fix one’s place and one’s relationship to political and cultural power. Indeed, the relationships in the poem—between the duke and his late and future duchesses, and between and among the duke, the count, the count’s agent, and even the artists who have been commissioned to carry out the duke’s will in executing his aesthetic vision—are defined by the residual feudal hierarchy of the early modern period and by the unwritten codes of conduct governing all of late feudal society. It is the traditions of courtesy and the social codes of the aristocracy that the duchess has transgressed in the prehistory of the poem. Unable or disinclined to receive small favors and gestures of flattery with regal composure, she instead has taken and evinced unself-conscious joy in them. They caused her to “blush,” to expose her own “heart .╯.╯. made glad” (ll. 31, 22). Her pleasures and gratitude were undignified in their transparency, leaving no room for greater or more profound shows of pleasure at the duke’s far more valuable favors. Indeed, her “smiles” were squandered on low objects, their value was diminished by their sheer numbers, and the value of the duke’s favors was likewise diminished in turn. The duke’s efforts to regain his superiority are complicated by his already much discussed refusal to “stoop” (ll. 34, 43), which frequently necessitates a remove from action and from the explicit issuing
The Pilgrim’s Progressâ•…â•… 239 of orders. Not only has he felt himself barred from directly intervening in his wife’s conduct, but now he must press the emissary into service so as to avoid direct negotiations with the count. Moreover, he must convey his expectations to this figure only obliquely, using the portrait of the late duchess as his medium. The emissary is charged with communicating warnings that the duke would never deign to bargain directly with the count, let alone his daughter. Of course, the scene of the monologue is not spontaneous; the interaction between the duke and the count’s agent is not unique. Rather, as the duke makes clear, he has repeatedly presented the image of his former wife to others, and it is suggested that he has delivered a version of this carefully crafted speech a number of times. The pretense to spontaneity is integral to this well-rehearsed act and to the early modern tradition of courtly grace or sprezzatura—the highly studied, highly labored effect of nonchalance or effortlessness. Indeed, this ceremony constitutes an exercise in the tradition of feudal hospitality for the duke, a tradition designed to celebrate the glory of his nobility. In it, he exercises superiority over the subordinate guest he hosts and mastery over the “wonders” in his gallery, thereby enacting and reiterating his social and cultural authority over all. Each instance of this traditional display must conform to its prototype and must be performed according to a set of rules and customs, some of which the duke inherits as a nobleman, some of which he has created. Part of the tradition entails pretending that it has been precipitated by another’s interest, the duke presents the painting as though in response to a curiosity he has sensed in the envoy, and he delivers the speech as though in reply to a question the envoy never actually poses. Consistent with the ceremonial ritual, the duke imposes silent inquiry on the envoy, the same inquiry he has elicited (or “seemed” to elicit [l. 11]) from all of the other “strangers” (l. 7) he has brought before his gallery: “How such a glance come there; so, not the first / Are you to turn and ask thus” (ll. 12–13), he disingenuously reassures the envoy, whom the poem offers no evidence of speaking at any point in the scene. This dynamic confirms both the feudal traditions invoked and dramatized by the
poem as well as the speaker’s psychologically complex relationship to them. Hilary Englert
BUNYAN, JOHNâ•… The Pilgrim’s Progressâ•… (1678)
John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress from This World to That Which is to Come has been a perennial best seller. Even before Bunyan (1628–88) died, more than 11 editions had been printed in England, and the book’s popularity has continued. Since its first appearance, it has been translated into more than 200 languages, and it has never gone out of print. The only other book that has been continually sold in such quantities is the English Bible. Yet the affinities between the Bible and Bunyan’s allegory are such that the influence of the former has added much to the popularity of the latter. Its own literary influence has also been noted. The Pilgrim’s Progress is partially the model for Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin and is mentioned in such novels as Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women and Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. The book is an allegory—allegory literally meaning “other reading” or “other word.” That is to say, The Pilgrim’s Progress attempts to say at least two things at once. There is the literal, surface-level reading, wherein the character Christian travels to the Celestial City, meeting strange and colorful figures along the way, and then there is a deeper, figurative reading, wherein the reader should see Christian as a figure of the human soul under the call of grace traveling toward death and then an eternal dwelling with God in heaven, a journey made possible by the death of Christ on the cross. A clergyman, Bunyan knew that other clergymen would attack him for presenting the truths of Christianity under the veil of fiction. He addressed their concerns in his prefatory poem “The Author’s Apology for His Book,” in which he defends his method by showing that the Bible itself uses allegory to teach its truths. As has been apparent by the book’s success, the vast majority of Bunyan’s readers agreed with him and have enjoyed the allegory without theological scruple. Matthew Horn
240â•…â•… Bunyan, John
Guilt in The Pilgrim’s Progress
One of the most commanding images of the opening pages of John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress is the figure of Christian, the pilgrim, being bent almost double by the large sack he must carry on his back. This is the sack of his sins, and the weight that presses down on Christian is the guilt he has before the one against whom he has sinned (God). Two of the Bible references relating to the sack in the first paragraph of The Pilgrim’s Progress speak of the debilitating effect of this weight: Psalms 38:4 speaks of an overwhelming guilt that is too heavy to bear, while Isaiah 64:6 paints a picture of the guilty sinner shriveled like a leaf and being mercilessly blown by the wind. It is no surprise that Bunyan emphasizes the image of guilt at the beginning of his allegory, for in his eyes a growing sense of one’s guilt before a holy God is the first sign that the soul is being drawn toward God in a good way, a way that leads to forgiveness. Among other things, Bunyan’s interpretation of the Bible would lead him to say that God’s standard for a human’s way of living is absolute— that is, it reaches and obtains to all humanity—and that no one can meet this standard. Thus, all have fallen short of God’s standard, and all human acts of supposed righteousness are really like filthy rags (Isaiah 64:6). Bunyan would say that if people do not realize this, then it is because they are blinded to this truth by their own sinful nature—that they are dead to spiritual things and thus cannot respond to any sort of outside human admonition against their sins, just as a dead person lying in a casket cannot respond to someone’s call for him or her to get up. Bunyan’s theology holds that if someone does begin to sense the guilt and does begin to associate this guilt with his or her faulty standing before God, then this is evidence that God’s miraculous power has been at work in that person’s heart, bringing a new life to it and a new orientation toward the things of God. The conversion process is not complete with this, however. The awakening sinner must next come to a genuine knowledge of why the wrath of God is upon him. Bunyan signals this continual awakening by continually increasing the burden on Christian’s back as Christian endeavors to find the narrow gate and to stay on the right path. This
would be the reason Christian’s burden is still on his back even after he has read (and believed) the Bible about God’s coming judgment against the sins of this world, has met the Evangelist and by him has been put on the narrow path, and has received more biblical insight at the house of the Interpreter. It is only some way into The Pilgrim’s Progress that Bunyan releases the burden from Christian’s back by having him come face to face with the bare cross. The cross symbolizes Christian’s personal apprehension of what Christ did on the cross to appease God’s wrath against the sins of humanity. When he accepts Christ’s sacrifice, his pack of sins rolls off his back and into the empty tomb by the side of the hill on which the cross stands. It is important to remember, however, that this does not mean that Christian is not perfect, without the tendency to sin. This means only that the official judgment of God against Christian has been removed on account of Christ’s work. Thus, Christian is given a new object to carry, a roll, which is fashioned by Bunyan to closely resemble the legal charters of the day, sustaining and obliging the fulfillment of a legal promise or proclamation, in order to have proof that he has been “legally” freed from the consequences of his sin. This means that although Christian loses the legal consequence for his sins, he does not lose the ability to sin or the ability to feel the emotional result of sin—guilt. So, periodically throughout the allegory, Christian will be buffeted with this feeling, and he will reach for the roll or will engage his companion in godly talk of justification in order to comfort himself. This strange predicament (of being beyond sin’s legal reach but not beyond its emotional effects) is the story of every true pilgrim whom Christian meets, and the predicament remains in place even until the very gates of the Celestial City. For as Christian crosses the river to reach the heavenly shore, he has one last, profound encounter with his guilt, which is figured in this scene as overwhelming waves, and here he almost loses the whole journey by succumbing to the sense of his sin. Yet a way out for Christian is found, and, true to form, Bunyan has this way be Christ himself, coming to Christian in the river in the form of a vision mediated by Bunyan’s memory of the Psalms.
The Pilgrim’s Progressâ•…â•… 241 To the very end, it is Christian’s belief in God’s promises that enables him to finally turn his own back on his guilt. Matthew Horn
Individual and Society in The Pilgrim’s Progress
Protestantism, or at least John Bunyan’s version of it, places so much emphasis on the idea that the core truths of Christianity must be embraced individually by individuals that an outside observer might be tempted to say Protestantism has no real concern for the unity and well-being of human society as a whole. This view would be mistaken, for Protestantism does not reject human society—but it does not accept it wholesale, either. Rather, it divides human society into two groups and positions the individual believer in relation to these groups. One group is constituted of people who know and accept the biblical tenets of Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection; the other of people who either do not know these beliefs or, if they do know them, do not accept them. The individual believer exists within the group of other like-minded believers and engages in edifying and encouraging the “family of God.” On the other hand, he or she exists outside of but up against the group of nonbelievers, and to this group the believer’s responsibility is one of evangelizing. In John Bunyan’s England, Protestantism’s tendency to divide society into smaller groups of the spiritual “haves” versus the “have-nots” was even more clearly felt and accepted, especially among those who had espoused some sort of Calvinism. There are various versions of this particular brand of Protestantism, but all of them, if they can be loosely labeled as Calvinistic, held that God had pre-chosen (“predestined”) all those who will eventually be converted to Christianity. According to this view, these people are the elect, and their numbers are few. They themselves do not even know whether they are elected until they have a salvation experience and begin to produce acts of righteousness. Even then, only God knows whether their conversion is genuine, for it is certainly possible for people to fake a conversion experience. Besides the elect, all others are the nonelect. These form the larger of the two groups by far, and they will eventually become
enemies of God. The only true test that reveals a person’s status is in how a person is accepted in the world to come: The elect will invariably be welcomed into heaven, and the nonelect will be punished eternally in hell. A corollary to this is that the current natural world is simply a proving ground, a place of incubation existing solely to help a person mature toward his or her genuine, permanent spiritual identity, be it for God or against God. The world exists as nothing more; in itself it is barren, temporary, fading. Bunyan, in the first nine words of his work, brings this point powerfully home: “As I walked through the wilderness of this world,╯.╯.╯.” There is no real doubt that Bunyan the preacher embraced a sort of mitigated Calvinism. This means that his character Christian in The Pilgrim’s Progress would see his current society as necessarily comprising mostly the alien nonelect, even if this was not apparent from people’s outward behavior. Thus, Christian starts off realizing that his former place in his preconversion society has been closed off to him: he no longer feels a part of the City of Destruction, and his wife, children, and neighbors do not want his company. Moreover, as he moves away from his former society in search of his new one, the promised Celestial City, he remains suspicious of and aloof from all whom he meets on the way before he can ascertain whether or not he has enough grounds to consider them part of the elect—in other words, part of his new, and infinitely better, society. This is the reason he will separate himself from his cotravelers so often, either by remaining on the straight path as they deviate (such as the characters Obstinate and Pliable, who both give up the path and return to the doomed society of the city as Christian continues on) or by maintaining an unsociable distance between himself and them while they both travel on the same path (such as the characters Formalist and Hypocrisy, whom Christian meets after he leaves the Interpreter’s house). Of course, Christian does meet those whom he accepts as genuine friends; Faithful and Hopeful both enjoy his comfort, companionship, and encouragement. It is to be understood that Faithful would have stayed with Christian until their entrance into the Celestial City but for his martyrdom, and Hopeful, who almost immediately takes
242â•…â•… Bunyan, John Faithful’s place, does keep company with Christian till the end. Faithful is killed by the residents of Vanity Fair, which as a place provides a sharper picture than does the City of Destruction of the society at odds with and antagonistic toward Christian and his companions. Ironically, the persecution brought upon the pilgrims by Vanity Fair actually helps them to secure their place in their eternal society: “Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 5:10). While they are on their journey, the pilgrims do receive tastes and glimpses of what the society of the elect will be like. At opportune times, the group lodged in Interpreter’s house and the one shepherding on the Delectable Mountains provide encouragement through community. But it is only at the end of the journey that the Pilgrims come into their own. Christian is aided by Hopeful in the perilous crossing of the river, and both are met at the banks by saints from the Celestial City who have come to escort the pilgrims in a heroes’ entry to the city to enjoy perpetual fellowship. For as they walk up the bank, the guides tell the pilgrims that in this city “you shall enjoy your friends again that are gone thither before you; and there you shall with joy receive even every one that follows into the holy place after you.” Matthew Horn
Religion in The Pilgrim’s Progress
When one thinks of religion in John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress, one should not think of an ambiguous attitude of spirituality or of a general belief in an afterlife. Instead, one should think of a very specific formulation of Christianity—Puritanism. The Puritans believed that the Bible alone held the answers to humanity’s trouble; that this trouble was sin, or one’s personal offenses against the standards of a holy God; and that the solution to sin was solely Christ’s sacrifice of himself on the cross. They also held that it was each individual’s duty to himself or herself to approach the Bible for one’s own personal acquisition of these truths. Only the Bible could genuinely educate about one’s sin against God and of the efficacy of the work of Jesus Christ. Finally, Puritans were convinced that this present world was
only a place that the saints, or the elect of God, were passing through on their way to heaven. Nothing from this world would transfer to the next, only one’s spiritual growth and spiritual reward gained from fighting the good fight (2 Tim. 4:7). This is why Bunyan’s story opens with the words “As I walked through the wilderness of this world,” and why the first picture he gives his reader is of the main character burdened with a bundle of sin, holding a book. The book is the Bible, and it has just convinced this man that he is a sinner (thus, the pressure of the bundle on his back) and that judgment by fire is coming upon him and his town (2 Pet. 3:7, 10). To escape this punishment, Christian, the pilgrim, must begin his journeys along the narrow way, a path that will first lead him to the Wicket Gate. This gate is a sign for Christian that he is indeed on the right path, for he can compare this Wicket Gate to the Bible’s teaching that all who are rightly called will enter through the narrow gate and all who jump the wall or enter by other ways are not true followers of Christ ( John 10:1). The true follower of the Puritan religion must not only pass through the narrow gate, he or she must also have a personal experience of spiritually embracing the remedy of the cross. Thus, shortly after this, Christian comes to a hill, upon which is the cross. He sees the cross; his burden rolls into an empty cave, a “sepulcher,” on the side of the hill (the empty tomb signifies the resurrected Christ); and he has a divine encounter with “three Shining Ones” who give him new clothes and a paper roll, his charter of salvation. This is a spiritual high point for Christian, and as long as he retains his roll, he is guaranteed a home in his final destination, the Celestial City; without the roll, however, he cannot get in. Thus, his journey from the cross to the gates of heaven is filled with moments of surety and of doubt—surety when he has the roll securely with him, doubt when he temporarily misplaces it out of carelessness. Christian is taught to completely exchange the values of this world for the values of the world that is to come, regardless of how exclusive this might make one seem to the citizens of this world. Thus, by constantly testing the words of those whom he meets, Christian eschews worldly friendship and
Don Juanâ•…â•… 243 counsel. His true companions are few but loyal. These are Faithful and Hopeful, the two virtues a pilgrim must have in order to stay the course to the Celestial City. And because of this rejection of the world on Christian’s part, the world rejects Christian. This is most clearly seen in the episode of Vanity Fair, which is a thinly disguised portrait of the whole ungodly system of secular society. When Christian and Faithful refuse to take part in the fair, they are imprisoned and tortured, and Faithful is killed. Christian’s opposition to the secular world is also seen when he is crossing the river flowing directly outside the Celestial City. The river, which stands for a believer’s death and passage from this world to the next, threatens to overwhelm Christian, who becomes convinced that all has been in vain and that he will be swallowed up by the waves. However, Christ himself appears to him in a vision and encourages him, enabling him to finish the crossing. This is the ideal capstone experience of a narrowly defined religion that helped many people like Christian and John Bunyan to make sense of this life’s trials and find hope in an expectation of eternal bliss. Matthew Horn
BYRON, GEORGE GORDON BYRON, LORDâ•… Don Juanâ•… (1817– 1824)
While the legend of Don Juan had circulated in several European countries, the Spanish play El burlador de Sevilla y convidado de piedra (1630) by Tirso de Molina, is considered its first literary expression. Of the innumerable versions that the legend spawned, those by Molière (1665), Mozart (1787), and Lord Byron (written 1817–24) are well known. There are two film versions, which transform the cruel heartbreaker into a lovable rogue. George Bernard Shaw, expectedly, projects him as contemplating the meaning and purpose of life. Not unexpectedly, Byron (1788–1824) transforms the cheap and shameful womanizer of popular legend into one easily, even helplessly, seduced by libidinous women. The poem quickly moves on to describe the young Don Juan’s sexual misadventures and his mother’s decision to send him abroad. Shipwrecked
and washed ashore, Don Juan is rescued by a Greek pirate’s young daughter, with whom he falls in love. Her father, enraged, succeeds in putting an end to their relationship. Don Juan is sold as a slave to a Turkish princess who loves him passionately. Escaping, he joins the Russian army against the Turks and attracts the attention of the Russian empress, who sends him to England on a diplomatic mission. The English setting provides Byron the opportunity to satirize the English. There is wide-ranging social, political, and ideological criticism. The aristocracy is denounced for material greed, hypocrisy, and pervasive vulgarity. Passionless English marriages of convenience are criticized. The apparently pointless pastimes of the bored upper classes are ridiculed. The poem was unfinished at the time of Byron’s death in 1824. But there is little evidence that Don Juan would have ended in Hell as he does in the Spanish legend. Byron projects him more as a victim of social corruption; uses his character to hang his seriously intended and articulated criticism of the sociopolitical life of the time; and presents, as Goethe put it, “a sharp and penetrating view of the world.” Gulshan Taneja
Education in Don Juan
While Lord Byron’s Don Juan’s central preoccupation is with Juan’s romantic antics and the speaker’s myriad digressive comments on contemporary society, the issue of education takes a central role in the epic’s opening sequence, which frames the remainder of the tale. In addition, the care that Juan takes to educate his charge, Leila, suggests a different mode of approaching moral education. As most clearly demonstrated in the descriptions of Juan’s education and his selection of Leila’s governess, Byron’s epic questions the effects of a chaste education and strongly suggests that better balance is necessary to equip youths to face the world’s temptations. As the epic opens, the speaker introduces Juan’s mother and primary tutor, Donna Inez, as .╯.╯. a walking calculation, Miss Edgeworth’s novels stepping from their covers, Or Mrs. Trimmer’s books on education,
244â•…â•… Byron, George Gordon Byron, Lord Or Coelebs’ Wife set out in quest of lovers (1.16.1–4) The speaker characterizes Juan’s mother as the perfect woman, so perfect that she possesses no “female error.” By comparing her to literary or textbook models of female education, the speaker casts Donna Inez as a model of the fictional or theoretical world; her attention to her son’s education reinforces this equation. This bookish approach to instruction, later characterized as “strictly moral” (1.39.4), illprepares the young man for congress with the world. The failing of Juan’s education is related to the characterization of his mother; As the speaker later relates, Inez’s “perfection is / Insipid in this naughty world of ours” (1.18.1–2). That insipidity translates into a sheltered education for Juan, his studies governed by a refusal to admit “a page of any thing that’s loose / Or hints continuation of the species” (1.40.6–7). To illustrate this lack in the boy’s knowledge, the speaker describes the ways in which the lessons of mythology are cleansed to protect the young mind (1.42– 45). The lack of more practical, worldly instruction in morality leaves the teenaged Juan open to seduction at the hands of Donna Julia. As the pair begin their ill-fated affair, Juan cannot understand why their discourse has become strained for of love “he had no more notion / Than he who never saw the sea of ocean” (1.70.7–8). His lack of worldly knowledge, frequently offered as the rationale for his sexual escapades, leads him into a variety of scrapes and becomes a way of excusing what would be considered immoral and licentious behavior in a gentleman. The education afforded Juan by his mother, who takes great care to keep him pure, contrasts sharply with the education Juan arranges for his ward, Julia. Lady Pinchbeck, described as a woman who “had been talked about” in her youth (12.47.1), has had closer contact with the world, a trait which renders her better qualified, in the speaker’s eyes, to educate young ladies: I think you’ll find from many a family picture
That daughters of such mothers as may know The world by experience rather than by lecture Turn out much better for the Smithfield Show Of vestals brought into the marriage mart Than those bred up by prudes without a heart. (12.46.3–8) The speaker juxtaposes “experience” and “lecture,” drawing a clear distinction between the two modes of learning to underscore the importance of practical knowledge in preparing young people to meet the world. While the young ladies being educated are prepared for entrance into a constraining social “marriage mart,” the preference for broader education is clearly illustrated. The speaker’s subsequent description of Lady Pinchbeck suggests that more worldly experience in youth could still result in one being “an exemplary wife” (12.47.8). Juan’s decision to entrust Leila’s education to this woman demonstrates, in the speaker’s eyes, a more reasoned approach to moral upbringing; by guiding youth through the pitfalls of experience, adults can best prepare them for the choices that lie ahead. The speaker portrays Juan as a “wealthy orphan” who is disadvantaged by an overly protective mother and should be pitied because “too soon they are parents to themselves” (17.4.1). Education, a foundational topic for the text, should encompass more than abstract, chaste knowledge to better equip youth to enter the world. Without guidance in making life choices, they may end up, like Byron’s protagonist, learning difficult life lessons while being tossed on the sea of humanity. Anita DeRouen
Futility in Don Juan
Lord Byron still remains associated in the minds of a great majority of readers as one who lived life on his own terms and in defiance of social constraints in more ways than one. As an individual, his life was marked by numerous scandals and endless adventures. While poverty and deprivation defined his early life, later, at Cambridge University, he spent less time studying than enjoying himself. Wit and
Don Juanâ•…â•… 245 humor gradually took over the tenor of his life, and his youthful indiscretions led to outrage and disgrace. As an artist, he stood halfway between the Augustan and the romantic but appeared to favor neither. Byron had an incorrigible sense of fun, was capable of irrepressible laughter, and tried his best to turn life’s ups and downs—and he had many—into many a sort of comic opera. Facetious, humorous, droll, exuberant, spirited, and witty all at once, Byron had his own demons to deal with. He had ideals, hopes, and incorrigible faith in the ability of mankind to achieve those ideals. Augustan commitment to order, harmony, justice, and fair play motivated his thinking. In life, he moved from crisis to crisis, but nothing dimmed his faith in radical endeavors. While this account of Byron’s life and character is commonly known, there is another side to his personality that has not been paid adequate attention. Though he was certainly not a misanthrope, he certainly was disillusioned. “That all is vanity” represents a strong and noticeable current in Don Juan: “Must I restrain me, through the fear of strife, / From holding up the nothingness of life?” (7.6.7–8). He quotes Socrates: “To know that nothing could be known” (7.5.2) The hero here, Don Juan, is a precursor to modern existentialists, who argue that the feelings, thoughts, and emotions of the individual are where meaning is to be found. An existentialist worldview can lead to a nihilistic one—in other words, a worldview in which nothing has meaning. In Don Juan, for instance, Byron seems to believe that humans constantly live under the burdens of despair, emptiness, and futility. When he seeks in the poem to analyze, for instance, the horrors of war, he can come to no other conclusion than to lay the blame for this horror squarely on the shoulders of the men who create war. For Byron, it seems to be a circle: man creates war; only man can stop war. Thus, it is futile. Byron defends himself against the charge of misanthropy thus: “I say no more than hath been said in Dante’s / Verse, .╯.╯. / By Fenelon, by Luther, and by Plato; / By Tillotson, and Wesley, and Rousseau, / Who knew this life was not worth a potato” (7.3.7–8, 4.2–4).
One can see and draw connections to modernism through Byron’s disillusionment with existentialistic despair: He “voices insights of a disillusioned .╯.╯. man of the world with a zest and vitality,” which compares well with the arid and defeatist attitude of the generation “waiting for Godot.” Toward the end of canto 1, he writes: What are the hopes of man? Old Egypt’s King Cheops erected the first pyramid And largest, thinking it was just the thing To keep his memory whole, and mummy hid, But somebody or other rummaging, Burgalariously broke his coffin’s lid: Let not a monument give you or me hopes, Since not a pinch of dust remains of Cheops. (1.219.1–8) And: What is the end of fame? ’tis but to fill A certain portion of uncertain paper: .╯.╯. For this men write, speak, preach, and heroes kill, And bards burn what they call their “midnight taper,” To have when the original is dust, A name, a wretched picture, and worse bust. (1.218.1–8) In viewing life as an embodiment of nothing but pointlessness and futility, Byron expresses himself with telling force. Gulshan Taneja
Individual and Society in Don Juan
Despite Byron’s epic ambitions, Don Juan remains a work uniquely individual in form and design. In its rambling, episodic structure, Don Juan and his life and adventures remain in many ways incidental to the poet’s endless digressions on innumerable subjects. Essentially and avowedly a satire as Don Juan is, chivalric traditions of romance are ridiculed. The satirical treatments of love, sex and sexuality,
246â•…â•… Camus, Albert wealth, power, war, religion, injustices heaped upon weaker members of the society, restraints on personal liberty and freedom of speech, and many more issues frequently monopolize the poet’s attention. England herself occupies center stage for a major share of Byron’s bitter tirades and provides a fertile ground for a satirical treatment of English society. After his Turkish adventures, Don Juan joins the Russian army. Empress Catherine is charmed with him. Sent to England for a change of climate, he is a handsome young man with fine, polished manners, who has impressive bearing and acts with appropriate decorum. With a hero who is intensely distracted by indifferent young maidens and madly swooned over by others, the poem’s social setting provides Byron with many delightful opportunities for satire. An innocent foreigner—that is, an observant bystander—becomes a stock device for the satirical treatment of social situations. Byron makes good use of Don Juan in this role. Juan comes to England full of enthusiasm, “lost in wonder for so great a nation, / .╯.╯. ‘And here,’ he cried, ‘is Freedom’s chosen station’↜” (11.9.3–5) when his idealistic reverie is interrupted by a highwayman: “Damn your eyes! Your money or your life!” (11.10.8). Byron goes on to satirize England of the years when the French Revolution was at its most idealistic high. Vulgar oligarchy is bitterly denounced, materialistic attitude and social hypocrisy are ruthlessly exposed. In comparison, England’s heroic defiance in the Napoleonic Wars of the early decades of the 19th century is recalled fondly. In English society, loveless, “cold” marriages of convenience are criticized. In fact, in Don Juan, marriage itself is treated ironically. Most marriages that Byron portrays in Don Juan are shown as unhappy. The pastimes of the bored rich—fox hunting, lounging, cards—are ridiculed. The high political ideals of the Whigs and the Tories are treated as indistinguishable, and political turncoats receive the bitterest scorn. The dedication to Don Juan focuses on Robert Southey; William Wordsworth receives a similar rebuff, while the self-indulgent, self-congratulatory narrow focus of the romantic poets receives a rap on the knuckles:
You—Gentlemen! by dint of long seclusion From better company, have kept your own .╯.╯. There is narrowness in such a notion, Which makes me wish you’d change your lakes for Ocean. (Dedication. 5.1–8) The social fabric is found to be unfavorable to a citizen’s growth and development. The absence of a meaningful sociopolitical structure and the failure of a system to nourish the individual in the end leads to amorality, irresponsibility, and defiance of existing social values, as these values have been corrupted and degraded by the dominating social classes. Despite his resourcefulness and courage, Don Juan is shown as a passive character. He ends up symbolizing society’s helpless victim, debased and manipulated rather than sheltered and supported. Byron provides a new definition of evil in this context. Unlike what the legend of Don Juan projects, evil, Byron would have us believe, flourishes not through rogue individuals but through society gone awry. Gulshan Taneja
CAMUS, ALBERTâ•… The Stranger (The Outsider)â•… (1942, 1946)
The Stranger, Albert Camus’s first novel, was published in French in 1942 and in English in 1946. Told in first-person point of view by the main character, Meursault, it recounts the events leading up to his execution for committing murder. Meursault’s mother dies at the beginning of the book, but other characters include Marie, a girlfriend who wants to marry him; Raymond, a neighbor who wants his help in getting revenge on a girl; Salamano, another neighbor; and, later, other characters in court and in prison. The 123-page novella is told in a very simple style, in brief sentences with little description but a lot of movement. Characterization, symbolism, epiphany, and suspense are present. Although numerous themes are apparent, including death, race, futility, alienation, and justice, the novel is most often discussed in light of absurdism, a philosophy that Camus (1913–60) basically invented.
The Strangerâ•…â•… 247 Existentialism is often seen as going together with absurdism, but Camus held that The Stranger was not an existentialist novel; he was investigating what he called “the nakedness of man faced with the absurd.” The Stranger is told in two parts. In the first part, Meursault describes the death of his mother, his relationships, and the events that result in him murdering an Arab man on the beach. In the second part, Meursault is in prison, where he meets with attorneys and, later, a chaplain. The trial takes place in part 2, and after the verdict is read, Meursault reflects on his life and awaits the day he will be executed. Chris Lessick
Death in The Stranger
Albert Camus’s The Stranger highlights the theme of death in a unique way. Meursault first deals with the death of his mother, followed by his murdering an Arab man, and finally his own impending death by the guillotine. Near the end of the novel, he states, “Since we’re all going to die, it’s obvious that when and how don’t matter,” which clearly illustrates that he recognizes death as nothing more than what happens at the end of life, a perspective that differs greatly from the common response and reaction to death. Upon receiving the news of his mother’s death, Meursault’s thoughts indicate that it’s more of a hassle than a tragedy, as he must ask for time off from work to attend the funeral. When he tells his boss, “It’s not my fault,” it is easily seen how his response to death is different from most people’s. Later, he wants to have a cigarette, but he says, “I hesitated, because I didn’t know if I could do it with Maman right there. I thought about it; it didn’t matter.” Obviously, Meursault does not seem to think anything substantial about death, as he decides that it does not matter if he smokes while holding vigil over his mother’s dead body. The rest of the vigil goes much the same way, with Meursault unappreciative of death’s significance. As a woman who claimed his mother was her only friend finally stops crying, his words are, “Then she finally shut up,” which clearly illustrates his insensitivity. Even during the funeral service the
next morning, the only thing that has any impact at all on Meursault is the heat he continually mentions, but nothing about burying his mother. As chapter 2 ends, he simply says, “It occurred to me that anyway one more Sunday was over, that Maman was buried now .╯.╯. and that, really, nothing had changed,” showing that he hardly recognizes any meaning or importance in death. At the climax of the story, Meursault expresses his indifference to death again as he takes the life of an Arab. Though he is detached from any emotion toward death, it does not excuse his action, and he later blames the sun for why he does it. As he states that “it was like knocking four quick times on the door of unhappiness,” he seems to understand the implications of what he has done. Yet at the same time, firing four more shots indicates a total lack of feeling. Part 2 of the book revolves around the trial, and much of it illustrates Meursault’s perspective on death, in that only at brief moments does he understand or appreciate the fact that he is the one on trial. When he is first arrested, he does not even understand the intimidation he exercises when he is put into a cell with Arabs who laugh at him and ask what he is in for: “I said I’d killed an Arab and they were all silent.” Again, even here, death seems to matter so little to him that he is able to admit to other Arabs that he killed one. Right before the trial, a policeman asks if he has “jitters,” and he responds “that, in a way, [he] was interested in seeing a trial,” which underscores the fact that he has still made no meaningful connection between the murder that he has committed and his own life. Not until the very end of the novel does Meursault finally come to a generally acceptable conclusion regarding death. Once he is certain that he will die by the guillotine, he considers that “Since we’re all going to die .╯.╯. I had to accept the rejection of my appeal.” Here he is finally able to relate his true thoughts about death—its inevitability and therefore the futility of sorrow. In the novel’s final pages, he understands that when his mother was nearing death, she was “ready to live it all again,” and that he, too, “felt ready to live it all again.” The Meursault who may be set beneath the guillotine’s blade the very next morning has perhaps come to fear death,
248â•…â•… Camus, Albert wanting another chance at life. He reveals that “for the first time .╯.╯. I opened myself to the gentle indifference of the world. Finding it so much like myself .╯.╯. I felt that I had been happy and that I was happy again.” Meursault, formerly apathetic, indifferent, and lacking any expression of sadness over death, ends his narrative with the realization that death is more than just the end of life. Chris Lessick
Futility in The Stranger
In The Stranger, a novel based on Albert Camus’s theory of the absurd, or the meaningless nature of life, futility—the idea that action is pointless or useless—is reflected in Meursault’s actions, thoughts, and words, which is particularly revealing since he is the narrator. At his mother’s funeral, in his relationships, the murder, and even while in prison, Meursault clearly conveys futility above anything else. It is shown, for examples, in how he approaches the vigil and the funeral. As it becomes dark, Meursault drinks coffee, then thinks, “I felt like having a smoke. But I hesitated, because I didn’t know if I could do it with Maman right there. I thought about it; it didn’t matter .╯.╯. we smoked.” Clearly, at such a somber moment in a person’s life—the night before his mother’s funeral—Meursault comes to the realization that something as trivial as smoking a cigarette—obviously in poor taste for the occasion— “didn’t matter.” In fact, at this time, nothing seems to matter much to him, as he focuses on sensory details—“the smell of flowers on the night air,” “huge stomachs old women can have,” and “[t]he woman [who] kept on crying.╯.╯.╯. I wished I didn’t have to listen to her anymore.” From the first-person point of view, only mundane observations are noted, nothing intuitive or meaningful. Again, Meursault’s behavior and thoughts signify that he does not feel any grief, that everything is futile. During the funeral procession the next day, the sun’s heat seems the only thing noteworthy to Meursault. The nurse tells him, “If you go slowly, you risk getting sunstroke. But if you go too fast, you work up a sweat and then catch a chill inside the church,” to which Meursault agrees, saying, “She was right. There was no way out,” The reader does not learn which he chooses, only that he deems it futile to
do either. Finally, as he closes that part of the story, Meursault states, “Sunday was over .╯.╯. Maman was buried now .╯.╯. and .╯.╯. really, nothing had changed,” which clearly shows that to him, mourning is futile. Obviously, Meursault’s outlook on life is that any reflection is pointless, as he continues as if nothing happened. Several of Meursault’s relationships also demonstrate the theme of futility, beginning with the relationship he starts with Marie the very next day. After they have gone out for a while, she asks him if he wants to marry her. Again, like his mother’s death, a marriage would seem important, but Meursault’s life is governed by futility, and therefore he replies that “it didn’t make any difference to me,” obviously showing his detached attitude toward life. In the situations with his neighbor, Raymond, Meursault again demonstrates detachment. He agrees to write the letter and later agrees to be a witness for Raymond, saying, “It didn’t matter to me.” Here his indecisiveness is the only certainty about Meursault; it seems that not much matters to him at all—because he finds it all futile. Futility is also depicted when Meursault shoots the Arab. He waits at the bungalow after the initial fight, debating whether to climb the stairs and face the women or stay on the beach. He calls the heat “intense” and then thinks, “To stay or to go, it amounted to the same thing.” The futility he perceives in the decision leads him to walk back toward the Arab. After he shoots, he admits, “I knew that I had shattered the silence of a beach where I’d been happy,” but he fires four more shots into the fallen man anyway. At this point, he realizes that he has basically ruined his life, saying, “It was like knocking four quick times on the door of unhappiness.” Undoubtedly, Meursault’s outlook on his actions— and on life in general—is one of futility. In the second part of the novel, Meursault’s time in prison and at trial signifies futility not only in its events but also in how Meursault perceives them. While the prosecutor and defense attorney seem to battle, Meursault wants to interject something, feeling as though his “fate was being decided without anyone so much as asking [his] opinion,” but a moment later, he thinks, “I didn’t have anything to say. Besides, I have to admit that whatever interest
The Strangerâ•…â•… 249 you can get people to take in you doesn’t last very long.” Once more, he falls back on the uselessness and pointlessness of things rather than having any hope at all, even for himself. Once the verdict is read, he recounts the moment “the presiding judge asked me if I had anything to say. I thought about it. I said, ‘No.’↜” At the reading of his own death sentence, he views any response as futile and therefore says nothing. Overall, The Stranger presents an apathetic, unfeeling, and detached main character whose thoughts and actions seem governed by futility. Meursault chooses one thing over another for no apparent reason, failing to consider anything in weighing his decisions. Camus’s theory of absurdism—that life’s events and decisions may ultimately be meaningless or pointless—is emphasized in Meursault’s personality, actions, and thoughts. Chris Lessick
Individual and Society in The Stranger
Many works of literature employ themes revolving around the individual and society. Albert Camus’s novel The Stranger contains an excellent demonstration of this theme with its main character, Meursault. Different philosophical theories as well as theories in other disciplines—psychology, sociology, anthropology, history—may have varying perspectives regarding the individual’s place in society. Also, different cultures have different frameworks for individuals in their societies. Nevertheless, there are general expectations, and common sense often governs those expectations. Meursault is an individual who thinks and acts differently from others, and it is almost exclusively these differences—not the matter of guilt in murder—that help the jury side with the prosecution and deliver his death sentence. The first event of the book is the death of Meursault’s mother. Since the story is told in first person, the reader gets Meursault’s thoughts as well as the narrative of his actions, and both deviate from what society would expect. To Meursault, going to the home is an annoyance, as are most of the events that follow, including the funeral procession. During the nightlong vigil over his mother’s body, he states, “I remember opening my eyes at one point.╯.╯.╯. Then I dozed off again.” In the last hours he spends with his
mother, he sleeps, rather than doing what might be expected of a person in that position—crying, thinking, remembering. The whole event is a bother to Meursault, having to ask for time off from work and using up a weekend, but common sense indicates an only son would deeply mourn his mother’s death. The death of a person’s mother would typically be upsetting, but in Meursault’s subsequent thoughts and actions the whole way through the funeral procession, the reader comes to realize that he is quite different rather than the typical. In Meursault’s reaction to his mother’s death, he seems slightly annoyed that he must ask his boss for time off work and then use up part of his weekend to make funeral arrangements. However, his attitude is expressed when he admits “that anyway one more Sunday was over, that Maman was buried now, that I was going back to work, and that, really, nothing had changed.” His easygoing attitude is best expressed here. Though a relaxed attitude is not a negative thing in general, the fact that he buried his mother and felt nothing at all about it is what makes him stand out from the crowd. Furthermore, the day after the funeral, Meursault begins a relationship with a girl, Marie, with whom he used to work. This is later used in the trial by the prosecution to show that he is different from “normal” people, stating, “the day after his mother’s death, this man was out swimming, starting up a dubious liaison, and going to the movies, a comedy, for laughs.” The shocked silence of the courtroom indicates society understands that Meursault is not a typical individual. In fact, the prosecution’s case is based almost exclusively on the discrepancies between Meursault’s actions and what society would expect from a person in his situation. The prosecutor announces how he will prove Meursault was guilty, ending it with “the dim light cast by the mind of this criminal soul.” After explaining all of the events that led up to the murder, highlighting the relationship with Marie and other points that paint Meursault as a remorseless person, Meursault says, “I couldn’t help admitting that he was right. I didn’t feel much remorse for what I’d done.” He wants to explain how he “had never been able to truly feel remorse for anything.” It
250â•…â•… Cao Xueqin is in those sad statements that the reader fully comes to understand how he is different. Immediately after that, the prosecutor begins to explain Meursault’s criminal soul. Meursault recounts the prosecutor’s words: “He said that he had peered into [my soul] and that he had found nothing .╯.╯. [and] the truth was that I didn’t have a soul and that nothing human .╯.╯. was within my reach.” The verdict of guilty and sentence of execution fully explains how society—represented by the jury—views Meursault. It is as if nothing can explain or excuse what he has done, simply because he is so different from anyone else. Meursault is a man whose life has been ruled by chance and whim. He does not actively try to be different but simply ignores society’s expectations, doing what he wants. The French title, L’Étranger, is often translated as The Stranger but just as often as The Outsider, and through his thoughts and behavior, Meursault is easily regarded as both a stranger and an outsider. Chris Lessick
of clear jade in his mouth. In his youth, Bao-yu often seeks and is intoxicated by the company of his female cousins and maids. His consequent lack of interest in scholarly pursuit incites displeasure in his father, Jia Zheng, a strict Confucian scholar. This causes much tension in the Jia household. Meanwhile, a celestial plant, which the stone had daily watered and revived in heaven, is incarnated in the earthly realm as Bao-yu’s female cousin, Lin Dai-yu (Black Jade), who is destined to repay the stone’s kindness with a legacy of tears. A triangular romance ensues, involving Bao-yu, Lin Dai-yu, and Bao-yu’s other female cousin, Xue Bao-chai (Precious Clasp), whom the elders trick Bao-yu into marrying. The brokenhearted Dai-yu dies as a result of this deception. Bao-yu eventually wins ancestral glory for his family and rescues them from their decline into poverty when he is placed seventh in the civil service examination. Yet, instead of returning home, a newly enlightened Bao-yu renounces the mortal world and is transported back to heaven by the Buddhist monk and Taoist priest. Edwina Quek
CAO XUEQINâ•… Dream of the Red Chamberâ•… (1791)
Family in Dream of the Red Chamber
Also known as The Story of the Stone, this 120-chapter work by Cao Xueqin (ca. 1715–ca. 1763) is widely hailed as China’s greatest novel. Its comprehensive narrative depicts 18th-century Chinese aristocratic life and features approximately 20 major and 400 minor characters. The novel portrays the colorful domestic life of the extended Jia family, including their concubines and maids. It explores themes of love, education, family, parenthood, gender, social class, Chinese traditions and customs, and the clash between worldly Confucian values and more esoteric Buddhist and Taoist beliefs. Dream of the Red Chamber opens with the mythic story of a stone that is deemed unsuitable and rejected by the goddess Nü-wa for the purpose of mending the firmament of heaven. Depressed and ashamed, this magical stone is taken to the earthly realm by a Buddhist monk and a Taoist priest to induce growth upon its consciousness. It enters the mortal world as a boy, Jia Bao-yu (Precious Jade), so named because he is born with an inscribed piece
The aristocratic Jia clan living in Jinling enjoys a history of relations with the imperial family. Baoyu’s elder sister, Yuan-chun, is the emperor’s imperial concubine. Bao-yu’s great-grandfather and greatgranduncle were also bestowed with inheritable princely titles for services rendered to the emperor. Both these noble branches of the Jia family reside in adjoining mansions called Rong-guo and Ning-guo. The novel traces the declining prosperity of the Jia clan caused by extravagant living and a gross mismanagement of household finances. With each succeeding generation, increasing moral degradation in its male members accelerates the family’s downfall. With the exception of Bao-yu and his upright father, Jia Zheng, Bao-yu’s uncle, Jia She; male cousins Jia Lian, Jia Zhen, and Xue Pan; and younger half brother, Jia Huan, have all fallen into vice. Bao-yu’s uncle, Jia Jing, who resides in a mountain, devotes his life to alchemy and a delusive search for immortality. The Jias’ female members manage the family’s domestic affairs. Grandmother Jia, the widow of
Dream of the Red Chamber â•…â•… 251 Bao-yu’s paternal grandfather, is the matriarch of Rong-guo mansion. She commands major domestic decisions such as the arranged marriage between Bao-yu and Bao-chai. Grandmother Jia’s seniority allows her to protect her favorite, Bao-yu, from Jia Zheng’s constant displeasure with him. Jia Zheng’s repeated deference to Grandmother Jia exemplifies respect for one’s elders, an important code of conduct in Confucian ethics. Grandmother Jia entrusts her capable daughter-in-law, Wang Xi-feng, with the day-to-day running of her 300-strong household. Xi-feng’s successful enforcement of discipline among numerous maids and servants particularly attests to her supreme management skills. Relations hoping to solicit monetary aid, political support, and education waivers vie for influence with the affluent Jias. The countrywoman, Grannie Liu, visits Rong-guo mansion on the pretext of paying her respects to Lady Wang but leaves with a gift of 20 silver taels that allows her family to tide over their impoverished circumstances. Poor relations who cannot afford private tuition for their children enroll them in a charitable private school run by the Jias. When the lawless Xue Pan is found guilty of manslaughter on two separate occasions, family connections and bribery allow him to turn the law in his favor. Law enforcers in the province know better than to offend the powerful Jia family and the Wang, Xue, and Shi households they are connected to by marriage. Although family solidarity is important to the Jias, occasional bouts of disharmony inevitably erupt in the household. A famous episode involves Xi-feng’s harsh treatment of her cousin, Jia Rui, who develops an illicit attraction toward her. When Jia Rui falls seriously ill as a result of unfulfilled longing, Xi-feng’s cruel refusal to provide him with sufficient tonics from her stores partially contributes to his death. Her maltreatment of her husband’s kind concubine, You Er-jie, also leads to the latter’s suicide. Another memorable episode sees Jia Huan’s maliciousness toward his half brother culminate in his deliberate framing of Bao-yu. Believing that Bao-yu attempted to rape the maid Golden and caused her suicide, Jia Zheng gives him a sound thrashing until blood soaks his clothes. Chaos
ensues in the household when a greatly distressed Grandmother Jia arrives on the scene. For the Jias, practical considerations take precedence over matters of love where marriage is concerned. Despite being aware of Bao-yu and Daiyu’s mutual affection for each other, Grandmother Jia and Lady Wang choose the healthy and capable Bao-chai over the sickly and ethereal Dai-yu to be Bao-yu’s bride. Bao-chai’s practical nature marks her as the more suitable wife to manage Bao-yu’s household. Moreover, being an orphan, Dai-yu has no parent to speak on behalf of her matrimonial interests. Servants form an important part of the novel’s familial landscape. When Bao-yu and his best friend, Qin Zhong, are insulted by Jokey Jin in the clan school, Bao-yu’s rash but loyal page, Tealeaf, wastes no time in admonishing the wrongdoer and challenging him to a fight to save Bao-yu’s honor. Grandmother Jia’s devoted maid, Faithful, hangs herself upon her mistress’s death so she can continue to serve her in the afterlife. In turn, masters and mistresses tend to treat their maids benevolently. Bao-yu’s touching goodbye to his maid, Skybright, sees them exchanging undershirts as tokens of affection for each other. Husbands are found for Xi-chun’s maids when she decides to become a nun, thus ensuring that they are well taken care of after their period of service. Cao Xueqin’s use of the Jias’ family life as a backdrop in Dream of the Red Chamber provides much cohesion to his highly episodic narrative. Characters that live and interact with one another in the mansions unravel their earthly fates based on the web of familial relationships they have been born into. This is also true for their maids, whose individual fates are closely tied to the master or mistress they serve. Edwina Quek
Gender in Dream of the Red Chamber
Bao-yu’s famous likening of girls to water and boys to mud underscores Dream of the Red Chamber’s disparate treatment of gender. Young girls are systematically elevated above their male counterparts in the spheres of literary talent and morality. While the boys of the clan school are easily distracted
252â•…â•… Cao Xueqin from their studies, poetry composed by the girls in Prospect Garden during the imperial concubine’s visit epitomizes the best of Chinese literary culture. An erudite Yuan-chun even improves on Chinese names given to places in the garden that have previously been chosen by a group of literary gentlemen. When Bao-yu falters in verse construction, Dai-yu and Bao-chai exercise their scholarship by rendering him valuable poetic assistance. Later, Xue Pan’s delinquent ways are sharply contrasted against his sister Bao-chai’s dutiful and sensible nature. She becomes her mother’s source of emotional support during Xue Pan’s extended stay in jail and competently manages her household in a time of chaos. Although the girls are obviously superior to the Jia males, including Bao-yu, gender inequality in Qing society keeps free expression of the girls’ talents within the walls of the Jia mansions. The exquisite poems crafted by Dai-yu and Bao-chai during the Crab-flower Club’s meetings, for example, may have been lost to posterity if not for Bao-yu’s promotion of them outside the mansions. While the Jia men enter and leave the mansions at will, the aristocratic girls are prohibited from such movements and any career pursuits of their own. Eventually, only Baoyu and his nephew, Jia Lan, sit for the civil service examination to win prestige for the Jia clan. Instead, the aristocratic girls are presented with very few life options as they come of age. Their destinies are, by default, to marry and leave their homes. Thereafter, their lives are entirely subject to the station and kindness of their husbands. An unfortunate Ying-chun suffers in the hands of her vile husband, Sun Shao-zu, to whom she was married on her father’s insistence. She soon dies of neglect as a result of her husband’s penny-pinching ways. Tanchun procures a good match through her father but cannot visit her family for a long time after moving to her bridal home on the coast. A reluctant Baochai acquiesces to be Bao-yu’s wife in accordance with the arrangement of the elders even though she knows his heart lies with Dai-yu. Her suppression of her feelings for filial obedience comes at the expense of true marital happiness. Barring death, the other viable life option for aristocratic girls is nunhood. After much negotiation with her family, Xi-chun
takes up the nun’s habit as a preferable alternative to marriage. Given these rigid gender prescriptions, chastity becomes the main means by which Chinese society judges a woman. Society’s inegalitarian treatment of women is especially pronounced when ruination and death ensue the moment a woman’s chastity is called into question. Rumors circulated by Xi-feng on You Er-jie’s dubious virtue before marriage cause the family and servants to lose respect for her, resulting in her suicide. When Liu Xiang-lian breaks off his engagement to You San-jie, the latter slits her throat before him as dramatic proof of her purity. Chess’s adherence to the chastity rule dictating that a woman may only engage in sexual relations with one man in her lifetime and her mother’s adamant refusal to release her to her lover instigates her dismay and suicide. Indeed, Dream of the Red Chamber shows many female characters with great potential to succeed in life becoming disempowered by the society they live in due to modest and unobtrusive behaviors that are expected of their gender. Even the old matriarch, Grandmother Jia, is not immune to this. The extent of her power never reaches beyond governing internal family matters. Toward the end of the novel, she laments to having the wool pulled over her eyes by the males of the clan, Jia She and Jia Zhen, whose wayward behavior outside precipitates the family’s downfall. While Xi-feng wins accolades for her powerful managerial skills and seems to be a counterexample to female disempowerment, one is reminded that she pays for her unconventional success with her spectacular fall from power and increasingly ill health at the end of the novel. To be fair, although Chinese society grants more freedom to men, some men are by no means exempt from a certain degree of suffering attendant to their gender. Considerable pressure is placed on Bao-yu as the male heir of the clan to accomplish honors in the civil service examination. He finally sublimates his desires, studies hard, and submits to this fate. Similarly, Jia Zheng eschews irresponsible enjoyment in favor of walking the rock-strewn path of righteousness, unlike other male family members. While the novel portrays suffering of the female gender in a more sympathetic light, it would be
Dream of the Red Chamber â•…â•… 253 better to conclude that forms of suffering in the novel are, to a large extent, gender-linked. Gender mediates each character’s individual experience, ultimately determining their quality of life. Edwina Quek
Social Class in Dream of the Red Chamber
With more than 400 characters from different walks of life filling its pages, Dream of the Red Chamber offers a panoramic view of the Chinese social class system during the Qing dynasty. Aristocratic families like the Jias who have been decorated by the emperor hail from the upper class. The lower classes are occupied by the family’s maids, pages, and poorer relations. While socioeconomic status and kinship relations are both important determinants of social class, the former plays a more important role than the latter. Despite being from the same clan register as the aristocratic Jias, the recent palace graduate, Jia Yu-cun, is reluctant to claim this familial connection as the Jias rank far above him on the social ladder. Poorer relations like Grannie Liu and Qin Zhong, who depend on the goodwill of the Jias, are also careful to defer to them, kinship ties notwithstanding. Grannie Liu makes several kowtows to the young Xi-feng on their first meeting to demonstrate respect for the latter’s higher social station. An unassuming Qin Zhong expresses discomfiture at Bao-yu’s suggestion that they address each other as equals since he comes from a poor family. Lowerclass members are more conscientious about following proper codes of conduct in the presence of their upper-class relations. Conversely, the upper class tends to abuse its power and influence. When a destitute Stony refuses to part with his beloved set of antique fans, a greedy Jia She takes advantage of his political connections in the government to seize Stony’s fans for himself. The rich and bad-tempered Xue Pan is another example of one who abuses his privileged social station. He gathers his henchmen to severely beat a poor country squire’s son, Feng Yuan, when both men enter into an ownership dispute over the pretty Caltrop. Leaving Feng Yuan to die from his wounds, Xue Pan whisks Caltrop away, only to abuse her when he grows tired of her later. In another incident,
an impatient Xue Pan hits a poor waiter on the head with a wine bowl, killing him. When the force of the law bears down on him, he avoids exile by bribing a magistrate to pass him a lighter sentence. Evidence of Xi-feng’s usury is also discovered during the imperial raid. Illegal promissory notes bearing exorbitant rates of interest to the poor are found in her apartments, and her husband, Jia Lian, is eventually punished for them. By including many incidents of lower-class oppression in his narrative, Cao’s novel exposes upper-class corruption of that era and may be read as a scathing indictment of this aspect of Chinese society. Social hierarchies also exist within the microcosm of the aristocratic Jia household. Elder siblings rank above younger ones in the Chinese family structure. Bao-yu’s father, Jia Zheng, continues to pay Jia She the respect due to an older brother even after the latter is disgraced and sent to exile. An exception occurs in the case of Yuan-chun, who is deemed royalty through her marriage to the emperor. Grandmother Jia, the older ladies, her father, and uncles arrive to pay their respects to her when she takes ill in the palace. Although legitimately married into the family, concubines and their children occupy a lower social station than first wives and their children. Jia Zheng’s concubine, Aunt Zhao, and her son, Jia Huan, do not have as much clout in the family as his wife, Lady Wang, and her son, Bao-yu. As such, Jia Huan’s conniving acts against Bao-yu often arise from jealousy of his better fortune. Hierarchies exist among the Jias’ servants as well. Maids are differentiated into senior and junior maids and wealthier servants have servants of their own. The genius of Cao Xueqin’s novel lies not so much in his complex portrayal of Chinese social structures as in his ability to show how these structures were reinforced and perpetuated in that era. Power is kept in the hands of the powerful through oppression and reward. When the maid Chess’s sexual indiscretions are discovered, she is immediately banished from the mansions as a negative example to keep the rest of the maids in line. The same goes for the maids Golden and Skybright, who do not actually deserve their employers’ harsh treatment of them. Thus oppressed, the lower classes are less
254â•…â•… Capote, Truman inclined to rebel and more willing to subordinate themselves to the upper class. Acts of reward by the upper class also allow them to reinforce their dominant place in the hierarchy. When Qin-shi’s little maid, Gem, takes her own life on learning of the death of her mistress, she is admired by the rest of the Jia clan for her rare devotion. Her posthumous ascension in rank is a message of reinforcement for the other maids to be loyal and obedient. Edwina Quek
CAPOTE, TRUMANâ•… In Cold Blood: A True Account of a Multiple Murder and Its Consequencesâ•… (1965)
Truman Capote (1924–84) claimed that with his book In Cold Blood, first published in The New Yorker in 1965 and in book form in 1966, he invented the genre of true crime. The book has been immensely popular, evidenced by two film adaptations and two films about Capote’s writing process. Literary scholars, critics, and students are particularly interested in it because, although the material in it is factually accurate, the text can be read like a work of fiction. Readers can identify common literary themes such as illness, justice, and freedom. The catalyst for In Cold Blood is “four shotgun blasts that, all told, ended six human lives.” This sentence, early in the book, informs the reader simultaneously that the Clutters—Herb, Bonnie, and their children Nancy and Kenyon—are murdered, and that the murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith, die as well. Dick and Perry, with their checkered pasts and tattooed bodies, stand in stark contrast to the clean, wholesome American image upheld by the Clutters and the citizens of their small hometown, Holcomb, Kansas. That the reader learns early on about their deaths centers the book on the consequences of the murder rather than on the murder itself. In Cold Blood involves a host of characters: the Clutter family; the investigators from the Kansas Bureau of Investigation—Al Dewey, Harold Nye, Roy Church and Clarence Duntz; the murderers Dick and Perry; their families and acquaintances; and the townspeople of Holcomb. It concurrently follows the murder investigation and Dick and Per-
ry’s road trip to Mexico and back, culminating with their apprehension in Las Vegas; their confession to the crime; the trial; and, ultimately, their execution. Ethan Meyers
Freedom in In Cold Blood
Dick Hickock and Perry Smith’s plan to rob the Clutter family was to be their last job and should have provided enough money for Dick and Perry to have the free lives they had only imagined. But the crime is botched and becomes brutal: The money they expect to find does not exist, and they inexplicably kill four members of the family, providing the title event for Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood. Rather than simply vilify the murderers, Capote presents Dick and Perry’s histories, dreams, and hopes to suggest, in part, that the multiple murder and the trail of crime that follows are Dick and Perry’s flailing stabs at unrealistic conceptions of freedom. Perry defines freedom in terms of escapist, boyish fantasies of buried treasure, and Dick can only conceive of an individualistic freedom. Both men are unable to reconcile their fantasies of freedom with the social responsibilities that Perry’s sister says are necessary in order to live in a free society. According to his father, freedom means more to Perry than anything. This value is understandable in light of his long history of confinement: As a child, he lived at the whims of rodeo parents and was orphaned and abused in a convent; as an adult, he became confined by his maimed legs and served time in jail. In response to the realities of confinement, Perry develops a concept of freedom symbolized by an imaginary parrot that saves him and savages his enemies, and by boyish dreams of sunken ships and buried treasure. The parrot visits Perry throughout his life, first during an especially abusive episode at the convent, and later when he is on death row. His parrot visions are matched by dreams of a carefree tropical life that belie his existence as an ex-convict and an inmate on death row. His life is anything but the carefree tourist life he imagines. Vacation advertisements for the Caribbean island of Cozumel in a men’s magazine naturally appeal to Perry as they unite his dreams of freedom in a single image of parrots flying from the mainland every year to lay their eggs. For a brief moment,
In Cold Blood: A True Account of a Multiple Murder and Its Consequencesâ•…â•… 255 Perry’s fantasies meet reality when he catches a large fish in Mexico. Capote invokes the parrot when he describes Perry looking “as though at last, and as in one of his dreams, a tall yellow bird had hauled him to heaven.” But, ultimately, real, tangible freedom eludes Perry, and he remains confined to a fantasy world. Whether due to his life history, his possible mental illness, or some other force, Perry ignores social responsibility, trying instead to seize freedom by murder or theft. Writing about a cold-blooded murderer, Capote paradoxically communicates the deep sadness of a man whose dreams are dominated by freedom and happiness, but whose reality is dominated by imprisonment and violence. Like Perry, Dick is physically and mentally confined. As the result of a severe car accident in which he sustained a head injury, Dick suffers crippling migraines and is unable to act according to his moral values. Although Dick teases Perry for his boyish fantasies, his sense of freedom is informed by fantasies, too. Instead of dreaming of sunken treasure, Dick enacts a fantasy-based outlaw existence. He plots a murder, steals cars, writes bad checks, spends money on alcohol and prostitutes, and siphons gas to drive across the country. One of his favorite memories is when he was stranded as an 18-year-old in the Colorado Rockies with only a gun, a radio, a little food, and some whiskey. It is a memory on which he bases a jailbreak scheme while he sits on death row. Dick’s fantasies of rugged individualism are rooted in a popular American fantasy of the lone, independent male hero who is responsible only to himself and his own survival. This brand of individualism comes at the cost of alienation from society. Dick and Perry’s freedom is antisocial. It is contingent on murder, theft, and escape rather than on responsibility to society. Like the poem Perry pretends to have written about “a race of men that don’t fit in,” Dick and Perry have the “curse of gypsy blood, / And they don’t know how to rest.” Because the curse leads not to Dick and Perry’s freedom but to their imprisonment, In Cold Blood raises questions about the responsibilities and costs of individual freedom. Capote complicates these questions by exploring Dick and Perry’s histories and psyches, considering not just two criminals who must pay for
their crimes, but two men struggling to make their realities conform to their fantasies of freedom. Ethan Myers
Illness in In Cold Blood
Dick Hickock, the accomplice to the murder that supplies the driving action for Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood, insists throughout the text that he is “a normal,” but his psychiatric evaluation prior to the murder trial reveals characteristics typical of a “severe character disorder.” Unable to deal with frustration except through antisocial behavior, he overcompensates for low self-esteem by lying, bragging, and fantasizing about being rich and powerful, and he has a “pathological inability” to sustain positive relationships. Although not indicative of mental illness, Dick’s pedophiliac tendencies are a source of great shame: He is more fearful of people discovering his deviant sexual fantasies than he is of hanging. What is, however, partially indicative of mental illness according to Dick and Perry’s psychiatrist, Dr. Jones, is that Dick’s moral convictions appear to have little impact on his actions. In reference to his impulses for theft and pedophilia, Dick says, “I know it is wrong. But at the time I never give any thought to whether it is right or wrong.” Dr. Jones notes that the majority of Dick’s antisocial behavior has occurred since his car accident in 1950, when he received severe head trauma. He experiences crippling migraines, hemorrhages from his nose and ear, and he once removed a piece of glass that had worked its way out of his head via the corner of his eye. Despite evidence that Dick suffers from mental illness due to a possible brain injury, the court is uninterested in gradations of mental health and bypasses Dr. Jones’s psychiatric evaluation. In his confession to the Clutter murder, Perry Smith says that he never meant to harm Herb Clutter; he thought Herb was a nice, soft-spoken man—“I thought so right up to the moment I cut his throat.” The emotional detachment of this statement is not only cold-blooded but is also evidence of “mental abnormality,” according to Dr. Jones. Perry outlived an alcoholic and absentee mother, an alcoholic sister who fell out a window to her death, and a brother who shot himself after driving his wife to suicide. In an orphanage run by nuns, Perry
256â•…â•… Capote, Truman received severe beatings for wetting the bed. As an adult, he still wets the bed, sucks his thumb, and fantasizes about buried treasure, but he has acquired an “ever-present, poorly controlled rage.” His friend Willie-Jay calls attention early in the novel to Perry’s propensity for “explosive emotional reaction out of all proportion to the occasion.” Like Dick and Perry, Bonnie Clutter exhibits symptoms of mental illness; however, her symptoms are reflected inward. She becomes hopeful shortly before her death that her anxiety, sadness, and social withdrawal are the results of misaligned vertebrae rather than postnatal depression. Her preference for a physical rather than mental or emotional ailment reveals the social and personal shame that she associates with mental illness. The townspeople in Holcomb use words like nervous or spell to describe Bonnie’s illness; they refer to her retirement at the mental hospital as “time away,” as though she were vacationing. The pain of seclusion becomes as debilitating as the depression itself. Although she worries that she is “missing out on everything. The best years, the children—everything,” she remains quarantined in her bedroom, unable to escape the crippling cycle of her depression. While the Kansas courthouse is uninterested in any gradations of sanity, preferring instead a blackand-white definition, Capote shows that mental illness is hard to define. Its causes span physical brain injury to a history of abuse and abandonment to the stress and anxiety associated with childbirth and child care. In Cold Blood resists a narrow definition of mental illness; instead, it expands and humanizes it, compelling the reader to question the differences between sanity and insanity or health and illness. Ethan Myers
Justice in In Cold Blood
Citizens of Holcomb, Kansas, the main setting in Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood, disregard class hierarchies when they claim that the town exists as an egalitarian utopia: “All equal, regardless of wealth, color, or creed. Everything the way it ought to be in a democracy; that’s us.” When the happy democracy of this small American town is disrupted by the murder of the Clutter family, the town must bring the murderers to justice in order to reestablish Hol-
comb’s harmony. In Cold Blood challenges popular conceptions of justice such as rehabilitation, retribution, or punishment; instead, it presents justice as a restoration of Holcomb’s ideals. The Clutters embody the way everything “ought to be in a democracy.” Herb Clutter, the father, is an educated, professionally successful church leader who rejects displays of class hierarchies by snubbing the local country club in favor of chairing the Finney County 4-H club, a national organization that serves children’s moral development. His daughter, Nancy, is a member of the club. In addition to practically running the Clutter house, she is an A student and president of her class; she plays piano and clarinet and wins awards every year at the county fair for her preserves, pastries, needlework, and flower arrangements. Despite Herb and Nancy’s embodiment of American values, the Clutter family’s perfection is clouded by mother Bonnie’s depression; likewise, Holcomb’s perfection is clouded by the Clutter murder. As the murderers Dick Hickock and Perry Smith descend on the apple-pie democracy of Holcomb, their criminal histories, possible mental illnesses, and poor educations stand in stark contrast to Nancy and Herb’s American values. They disrupt Holcomb’s utopia. Dick and Perry’s execution is part of a national identity in which hangings are as American as Nancy’s award-winning pie. Execution is the most severe punishment for violating society’s rules; it is the ultimate removal from society. Dick and Perry effectively remove themselves from Holcomb’s society by a road-trip flight to Mexico, but the execution serves as a public and permanent removal. The Kansas justice system delivers the decision, but the identities of the beneficiaries remain ambiguous. The convicts are executed, so justice serves no rehabilitative benefit for them. The victims have been murdered; justice is not for them. As the only survivors, the townspeople and a few family members are the only potential beneficiaries of justice. Instead of serving the criminals or the victims, justice serves the greater society: By permanently removing imperfect, criminal actors from society, Holcomb can return to a purer, more innocent time. Dick and Perry hang in order to restore Holcomb’s democratic harmony. In
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderlandâ•…â•… 257 this equation, as Capote states, execution is a “ritual of vengeance.” Executions uphold a vision of justice while acting out vengeance. Likewise, prisons are sites where convicts are supposedly brought to justice, but Capote shows that they are also sites of criminal intensification where prisoners meet each other and learn about potential criminal acts. In prison, Dick and Perry first meet, Perry invents a past murder, and Dick learns of the Clutters and plots their burglary. In the book, prison preserves images of successful democracy by removing criminals from the society that they have interrupted; simultaneously, prison encourages and intensifies criminal behavior. Dick and Perry do not fit into the exemplary American image that Holcomb and its citizenry desire. Both men exhibit symptoms of mental illness. They have criminal backgrounds. Perry has a history of abuse. Their antisocial behavior places them in sharp contrast to the American ideals of Holcomb and the Clutter family. The Kansas justice system remains aloof when it comes to considering the justice of Dick and Perry’s past. Perry’s abuse by nuns is no more just than his murder of the Clutters, but the justice system ignores psychosocial complexities and histories in favor of black-and-white definitions of right and wrong. It does not matter whether it is “just” that Perry was abused as a child, that his mother was an alcoholic, that two of his siblings committed suicide, or that he exhibits symptoms of mental illness. It does not matter that a psychiatrist states that Dick is unable to base his actions on what he knows is right or wrong. What matters is that Dick and Perry killed the Clutters, that they interrupted Holcomb’s ideal, and that they are executed as an act of vengeance. Prior to Dick and Perry’s descent on Holcomb, the townspeople did not think even to lock their doors, but “those somber explosions .╯.╯. stimulated fires of mistrust in the glare of which many old neighbors viewed each other strangely, and as strangers.” The town’s primary interest is to use justice to reestablish Holcomb’s democratic harmony. Ethan Myers
CARROLL, LEWISâ•… Alice’s Adventures in Wonderlandâ•… (1865)
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, generally regarded as a children’s literature classic, was written in 1865 by Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (1832–98), better known by his pen name, Lewis Carroll. The book relates the account of seven-year-old Alice, a curious and precocious little girl who, intrigued by a glimpse of a well-dressed rabbit, proceeds to follow him and plunges down a rabbit hole. What Alice finds at the bottom of her fall is another dimension where nonsense and irrationality are the norm, a place where the world as Alice has come to know it no longer makes sense—a place called “Wonderland.” Alice learns to navigate the strange ways of Wonderland, although she does not exactly understand them. And in the end, she even shows the fairy tale–like kingdom’s inhabitants the ways in which their society is hypocritical, a deed that arguably gives her the confidence to return home. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland is generally heralded for its fantastic elements. However, the book is also a satire in the strictest sense: It is about manners; societal institutions; language; culture; and, perhaps most significantly, growing up. The reader witnesses Alice’s memorable encounters with the Cheshire Cat, the Mad Hatter, a smoking caterpillar, and the Queen of Hearts, among other colorful characters, and watches her grow from innocence to experience, while growing along with her. In this regard, due to the plot’s imaginative nature and the book’s magical realm, talking animals, and dream sequence near its conclusion, it can be considered analogous to a fairy tale. As fairy tales allow audiences to place themselves within the story because of their agelessness and undefined location, any child—or any adult for that matter—has the ability to travel to Wonderland. No wonder Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland has been a beloved classic for more than a century. Trudi Van Dyke
Innocence and Experience in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
As the title proposes, Lewis Carroll’s Victorian-era fantasy Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland relates the escapades of a bored, curious, and innocent young
258â•…â•… Carroll, Lewis girl named Alice as she ventures into Wonderland, a realm where madness and rudeness—an ironic exaggeration of Alice’s own sophisticated Victorian society—govern the kingdom. The catalyst for the commencement of Alice’s journey to Wonderland is generally considered to be the character of a wellmannered dapper white rabbit, who, like the creatures in most fairy tales, has the peculiar ability to speak. Yet as Alice is “burning with curiosity” to follow the rabbit down his hole, her intense inquisitiveness, coupled with her naive willingness to indulge her curiosity no matter where it leads may be the genuine reason for her entrance into Wonderland. In this regard, analogous to Eve’s temptation by the serpent in the Garden of Eden, which causes her to partake from the tree of knowledge and leads to her metaphorical fall from innocence, Alice is similarly enticed by the rabbit. Therefore, like Eve, Alice’s curiosity leads to her literal fall, a fall in which “she fell very slowly.” For Alice, that her fall is gradual seems intentional as it only signifies the initial phase—not the completion—of her journey from innocence to experience. Upon Alice’s arrival in Wonderland, it is evident that despite the knowledge that theoretically should have been gained in the fall, Alice is still not entirely certain about how to handle the complex predicament in which she has found herself, suggesting a lack of experience in such matters; after all, she is only a child. Nevertheless, while she may not have experience, it is evident that Alice has lost some of her innocence, as she has become too big to enter a beautiful garden she finds, once again aligning Alice with Eve. Alice also has some knowledge that would suggest experience. For example, she is cautious enough to check whether labels on bottles are marked “poison,” but this privileged knowledge is just a clever trick she has gleaned from “several nice little stories about children who had got burnt, and eaten up by wild beasts, and other unpleasant things, all because they would not remember the simple rules their friends had taught them.” Therefore, these “rules” acquired from fairy tales and adult influence, though vital to her survival, are not wisdom she has gained from personal learning experiences, a clue that she still has much to learn on her own.
Alice’s struggle with obtaining a greater maturity about herself and society is also evidenced in her insecurity about her identity, which is a recurring motif throughout the novel. Alice’s identity is questioned with logic that appears to be nonsense to her (and to most readers), uttered by each of the different characters whom she meets along the way, including the Cheshire Cat, the Mad Hatter, the March Hare, and the hookah-smoking caterpillar. These characters continually question Alice about who or what she is, and at first she can only stammer unconvincing replies. However, the Wonderland characters’ rude and often illogical challenging of who and what she is allows Alice to grow and understand precisely who she is, thus becoming confident in her personal identity. In the end, it is Alice’s unwavering conviction of who she is that grants her enough courage to challenge the Queen of Hearts. This is where the evolution of Alice’s maturation becomes most apparent. Near the end of Alice’s excursion to Wonderland, she is finally able to enter the very garden that she desired to enter at the beginning of the novel, as she is no longer fluctuating in size. However, as she has become more stable, both physically and mentally, the garden no longer holds the same captivating allure for Alice. She now realizes that Wonderland’s garden is not a paradise; it is not as beautiful as she dreamed from afar. Many of the flowers are not real, only painted, and no one plays by the rules—something Alice respects and learned from children’s stories. As a result of these harsh truths, Alice proceeds to contest what she is now absolutely certain are the illogical rules of Wonderland—a feat that essentially causes her to be banished from that kingdom and to wake on the shore of a lake, wondering if the whole incident was just a dream. Such an ambiguous ending implies that the struggle between wanting to stay innocent and gaining experience is fierce. However, perhaps the final scene before Alice leaves Wonderland suggests that the value of experience and playing by the rules is much greater than that of naïveté, and the only way to achieve that is, like Alice, to gain confidence in one’s identity and all experience to gain supremacy. Trudi Van Dyke
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderlandâ•…â•… 259
Justice in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
Although Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland satirically yet comically critiques logic and societal institutions such as education throughout its entirety, the nature of justice is harshly evaluated in the book’s final chapters. In the concluding segment, Alice attends the trial of the Knave of Hearts, who is accused of stealing the Queen of Heart’s tarts. In keeping with the lopsided logic and the inherent absurdity of Wonderland, Carroll fashions a tongue-twister–like parchment scroll pronouncement, which is recited by the White Rabbit at the outset of the trial: The Queen of Hearts, she made some tarts, All on a summer day: The Knave of Hearts, he stole those tarts And took them quite away! This brief description of the trial is evidence of the mockery of justice and the penal system that is to follow in the last two chapters of the book. The witnesses and attendees at the trial include many of the characters that Alice encountered earlier in the book, including the Mad Hatter, the Dormouse, the March Hare, and the Duchess’s cook, to name a few. The first witness is the Mad Hatter. In his testimony, which he apparently cannot give without having a cup of tea and buttered bread— after all, “it’s always teatime” in Wonderland—the Mad Hatter cannot get his dates right. After being informed that if he did not remember, he would be executed, the Hatter is finally excused to go finish his tea. During this scene, it is not only the fact that the Mad Hatter has food and drink in the court that ridicules the sanctity of justice, it is also because throughout his testimony, several other members of the court audience chime in when the Mad Hatter is unable to remember his dates precisely. The King of Hearts, who serves as both judge and all-too-willing would-be executioner, does nothing to control the chaos in the court. In fact, the king, despite his position of lofty power, has to be told the procedures he should be following by the White Rabbit. With this turn of events, Carroll seems to be criticizing the notion that many officials held in high standing are often just figureheads who do not really know
anything about the requirements and dignity that are expected of that position and are often just gifted with that status because of birth, nepotism, and the other arbitrary practices. The next witness after the Mad Hatter is the Duchess’s cook, who disappears after admitting that the tarts are made with pepper. Meanwhile, Alice, who has been growing once again—this time without the aid of any drink or cake—disrupts the court with her expanding size. Spying her physical growth, the King of Hearts invents a new rule on the spot, that “All persons more than a mile high [must] leave the court.” Alice stands up to the king and informs him both that she is not a mile high and that this rule was just invented because of the circumstances, illustrating her mental growth as well. Furthermore, as the White Rabbit introduces the next piece of evidence, Alice once again demonstrates how the king’s logic is faulty. The king wants to condemn the Knave of Hearts for not signing his name to a set of verses that the king claims is evidence that he stole the tarts. Alice, however, contends that as no one can explain the meaning between the lines of the verse, as she herself cannot see “an atom of meaning in it,” then there is no way that the knave could be guilty of the crime of which he is accused. This episode also suggests that if the knave cannot be found guilty of stealing the tarts, the court will try to find him guilty of something else, lest the king and queen’s reputation be damaged. Yet Alice once again shows how she has grown; she proudly points out that the set of verse ends with “they all returned from him to you,” and the allegedly stolen tarts have been right there on the table all along. Despite Alice showing the jury that the knave is innocent, the Queen of Hearts insists, “Sentence first—verdict afterwards.” Exasperated with the “[s]tuff and nonsense” of Wonderland, Alice logically contends that it is crazy to sentence someone who should be deemed innocent. Although the Queen of Hearts tells her to hold her tongue, Alice, now grown to her full size, defies the orders and lashes out in a fury. In the next scene, Alice, back in the real world, wakes from a dream, but her character nevertheless suggests that justice is perhaps the most worthy cause for which to fight. Trudi Van Dyke
260â•…â•… Carroll, Lewis
Stages of Life in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
Although a Victorian-era fantasy, Lewis Carroll’s children’s classic Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland illustrates—albeit rather covertly—the stages of life, especially in relation to childhood and adolescence. The novel opens with what has become an iconic set of circumstances: Seven-year-old prepubescent Alice’s inquisitiveness leads her to follow a white rabbit down a hole into a magical realm permeated by nonsense and irrationality, Wonderland. While the act of jumping down a rabbit hole into another dimension certainly signifies the onset of change, even more significant are the personal changes that Alice undergoes during her stay in Wonderland. Early on her journey, Alice spies a beautiful, enchanting garden through a small doorway, which she cannot enter due to her size. Alice cries, lamenting being denied access to the garden because she is too big. However, this denial also functions as a deeper type of refusal, signifying that Alice is no longer permitted access to the bastion of edenic innocence, the garden. Struggling to maintain her connection to her childhood innocence, Alice uses the only available resources to try to adjust her size: a bottle labeled “drink me” and a cake marked “eat me.” Proving that while she may be curious, she is at least endowed with a modicum of common sense that places her on the verge of adulthood, Alice is initially cautious about drinking from the bottle. According to the novel: It was all very well to say to say “Drink me,” but the wise little Alice was not going to do that in a hurry. “No, I’ll look first,” she said, “and see whether it is marked ‘poison’ or not.” .╯.╯. However, this bottle was not marked “poison,” so Alice ventured to taste it, and finding it very nice (it had, in fact, a sort of mixed flavour of cherry-tart, custard, pine-apple, roast turkey, toffy, and hot buttered toast), she very soon finished it off. Yet, despite Alice’s rather courageous efforts—drinking an atrocious-sounding concoction and consuming a cake made with mysterious ingredients—she is still unable to access the garden. Her fluctuations
in size suggest that while she cannot enter the realm of paradisiacal innocence, she is also not yet ready to enter adulthood. Therefore, although Alice is only a precocious seven-year-old, Wonderland (and her adventures while there) apparently function as the catalyst for the onset of Alice’s adolescence. Throughout the rest of the novel, Alice uses food and drink to try to manage her uncontrollable size, but she begins to understand just how to regulate the fluctuations from a hookah-smoking caterpillar who offers Alice a tidbit of wisdom about mushrooms: “One side will make you grow taller, and the other side will make you grow shorter.” It seems rather significant that Alice gets such advice from a type of creature who will undergo a metamorphosis, similar to the one that Alice is experiencing, when the caterpillar transforms into a butterfly. When the caterpillar leaves Alice alone, however, she consumes part of the mushroom, and her neck stretches so long that a pigeon attacks her, assuming that she is after its eggs. These episodes in Alice’s adventures are noteworthy, as both the caterpillar and the eggs could be representative of the burgeoning fertility and sense of new life that accompanies adolescence. And it does not seem to be coincidence that all of these incidents related to Alice’s changing size coincide with her continual questioning of her identity, another motif within the novel. From the very beginning of Alice’s adventures in Wonderland, she starts to question who and what she is, as do each of the Wonderland denizens that she encounters. When Alice meets the caterpillar, the one who shows her how to boldly yet shrewdly control her size, she still has to figure out how to alter her person appropriately, according to occasion and circumstance, on her own. However, once she starts learning, she also becomes more confident in her identity and abilities: How puzzling all these changes are! I’m never sure what I’m going to be, from one minute to another! However, I’ve got to get back to my right size: the next thing is, to get into that beautiful garden—how is that to be done, I wonder?
“Cathedral”â•…â•… 261 With her newfound knowledge, Alice does figure out how to get into the garden, but it is not the paradise that it looked like from afar; it is disenchanting. Alice’s reaction to the garden proves that once adolescent experience has altered us, we cannot return to a purely innocent childhood state. Nevertheless, as Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland illustrates, we may gain something even better in the exchange that most, if not all, children do not possess: confidence and self-knowledge. Trudi Van Dyke
CARVER, RAYMONDâ•… “Cathedral”â•… (1981)
First published in 1981 in the Atlantic Monthly, “Cathedral” became the title story of Raymond Carver’s sixth collection of short fiction, which was published in 1983. Although Carver (1938–88), a prolific writer, had published numerous collections of fiction and poetry before Cathedral, the short story and the collection that bears its name signal a turning point in the author’s career. “Cathedral” was included in the 1982 volume of The Best American Short Stories, and the book Cathedral was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize in 1984. But more important than the accolades the short story earned was the new imaginative space it opened up in Carver’s world of fiction. Carver had already been credited with recreating and reviving interest in the American short story, but he had also been criticized for writing minimalist fiction that left its characters just where they started: inarticulate figures wandering through a world of dull despair and disillusion. In “Cathedral,” Carver grants his main character an epiphany (although one that is perhaps limited and imperfect) and simultaneously opens up his characters’ lives and his own writing to the dimensions of a deeper understanding. Though written in Carver’s spare, unadorned idiom, “Cathedral” eloquently explores the themes of alienation, community, and spirituality in the modern world. The main characters of “Cathedral” are Robert, the narrator, and the narrator’s wife. Robert, a blind man who is a longtime friend of the narrator’s wife, is coming to visit the narrator and his wife after the death of his own wife, Beulah. The narrator, who
has no interest in meeting Robert, despite Robert’s important role in his wife’s life, lives in a small, selfcontained world in which he smokes pot, drinks heavily, watches television, and does precious little else. Yet by the end of the evening, after the narrator’s wife has fallen asleep, the narrator and Robert experience a profound moment of connection when, in a real attempt to communicate with Robert, the narrator and Robert draw a cathedral together. Cara McClintock-Walsh
Alienation in “Cathedral”
The story arc of “Cathedral” traces the narrator’s movement from alienation to intimacy, or from isolation to a sense of community. The unnamed first-person narrator opens the story by recounting scenes from his wife’s friendship with Robert, a blind man who is about to visit them. These scenes, and Robert’s appearance in the couple’s life, delineate a sharp contrast between his wife’s capacity for intimate relationships and the narrator’s own arid, lonely existence. The wife’s relationship with Robert, initially that of employee and employer, deepens into a meaningful friendship and culminates in an act of physical intimacy between the two: “On her last day in the office, the blind man asked if he could touch her face. She agreed to this. She told me he touched his finger to every part of her face, her nose—even her neck! She never forgot it.” Here Robert physically touches the contours of the wife’s face; in other ways, he touches the contours of the wife’s life, and acts as her trusted and valued confidante. Over the years, the wife and Robert have been recording and sending audiotapes to one another that act as revelatory personal missives between the two. In the wife’s life, Robert symbolizes intimacy and emotional connection. Compare these moments of communion between Robert and the wife to the narrator’s inability (and refusal) to relate to or forge a bond with anyone in his life. When looking at other people’s meaningful relationships, the narrator either disparages them or denies them significance. When telling the story of his wife’s life, the narrator elides any discussion of love with a blithe “etc.” Of his wife’s first husband, the narrator says: “But she was in love with the guy, and he was in love with her, etc.╯.╯.╯. [A]t
262â•…â•… Carver, Raymond the end of the summer she .╯.╯. married her childhood etc.” Similarly, the narrator reduces his wife’s friendship with Robert to either a point of annoyance or an insensitive joke. He admits that “I wasn’t enthusiastic about his visit. He was no one I knew. And his being blind bothered me,” and at one point he jokes that perhaps he will take the blind man bowling. The narrator even stoops to making fun of Robert’s recently deceased wife and callously calls their marriage “[p]athetic.” At first, it seems that the narrator rejects Robert because Robert is blind, but after revealing his own misanthropic tendencies throughout the story, it seems that he rejects Robert simply because the narrator is emotionally barren and almost entirely incapable of relating to others. The narrator’s sense of alienation is so pervasive that he feels estranged not only from Robert but also from his wife and the world in general. When his wife offers to let the narrator listen to a tape that Robert made about him, he reluctantly agrees. But just as Robert is about reveal his opinion of the narrator, “we were interrupted, a knock at the door, something, and we didn’t ever get back to the tape. Maybe it was just as well. I’d heard all I wanted to.” Similarly, when given the opportunity to understand his wife through her poetry, which is about “really important [things that] had happened to her,” the narrator only remarks that “I didn’t think much of the poem.╯.╯.╯. Maybe I just don’t understand poetry.” Not only does the narrator fail to understand poetry, he fails to understand his wife, and he shows little desire to do so. The undelivered message and the barely read poem signal the narrator’s desire to insulate himself from others, even from messages his wife is trying to communicate to him. Even though his wife, in her first marriage, tried to kill herself because she felt so “lonely and cut off from people,” the narrator of “Cathedral” seems unaware that he is recreating for her a life of loneliness and isolation. Although the narrator resents Robert throughout most of the story, and although he resists a meaningful connection with Robert by erecting barriers between them in the form of television, alcohol, and marijuana (all further symbols of the narrator’s alienation), by the end of “Cathedral,” Robert brings the narrator in touch, physically and emotionally, with the world. When the narrator asks Robert if
he knows what a cathedral looks like, he expresses his first moment of empathy, an empathy he builds upon when he closes his eyes in an attempt to “see” from Robert’s point of view. In his attempt to define a cathedral for Robert, the narrator breaks through the surface of life and delves into “the interior stuff.” The verbal connection—the narrator describing cathedrals to Robert—precedes the physical connection between the two men. When the narrator draws a cathedral at Robert’s behest and lets Robert close “his hand over my hand,” he experiences a connection with another human being that is more than physical: It is profound and spiritual. We understand that this connection with Robert heralds a connection with the world in general when Robert makes the narrator draw “some people” in the cathedral because “What’s a cathedral without people?” Through this encounter, the narrator moves from isolation to intimacy, from nothing to something, from total alienation to a newly populated emotional world. Cara McClintock-Walsh
Community in “Cathedral”
All three of the major characters in “Cathedral” find themselves isolated from others and, to differing degrees, express a longing to connect with or belong to a larger community. Robert’s cross-country trip, which ends with his visit to the narrator and the narrator’s wife, illustrates his attempt to find comfort in the community of his in-laws and his friends after his wife’s death leaves him in a state of sudden isolation. Beulah, whose very name means “married,” had been a partner to Robert in all ways: She was his wife, his interpreter (she worked for Robert immediately after the narrator’s wife did), and his business partner; in short, she was his world. When Robert and Beulah married, it was “just the two of them,” and throughout their marriage “they had been inseparable for eight years—my wife’s word, inseparable.” When Robert loses the woman who in all ways appeared to be the other half of him, he reaches out to and travels toward two living embodiments of his wife: Beulah’s family and the narrator’s wife, whom Robert had met in the same way he met Beulah. In his journey from the West Coast to the East Coast, from solitude to solace, Robert embarks
“Cathedral”â•…â•… 263 on a quest that will bestow a greater sense of community on all of the characters in “Cathedral.” Raymond Carver expresses perhaps the most poignant and moving expression of a need for community through the figure of the narrator’s wife. Throughout her life, the wife has experienced a profound feeling of disconnection and a strong desire to find a larger community to join. In her first marriage to an air force officer, the narrator’s wife felt so overwhelmingly dislocated and remote that she attempted to kill herself. We know her suicide attempt is directly tied to her longing for community: “[O]ne night she got to feeling lonely and cut off from people she kept losing in that moving-around life. She got to feeling she couldn’t go another step. She went in and swallowed all the pills and capsules in the medicine chest and washed them down with a bottle of gin.” The narrator’s wife survives her suicide attempt and a subsequent divorce only to find herself married to a man, the narrator, who seems completely committed to isolating himself from the rest of the world. For the narrator’s wife, Robert represents, and has represented, a lifeline to the larger world. During her dark days of dislocation as an officer’s wife, one of the few constants in her life was her communication with Robert (in the form of audiotapes). Although physically distant, Robert remains emotionally close to the narrator’s wife and offers her counsel on her first marriage as well as her second. In her second marriage (to the narrator) the wife feels a similar sense of isolation within the bounds of her marriage: Her husband, the narrator, has no friends, and therefore does not enlarge their social circle; he shows only grudging interest in her poetry; the husband and wife no longer go to bed at the same time; and, most tellingly, the narrator feels relieved when a mundane interruption saves him from listening to the tape on which Robert delivers his opinion of their marriage. In the life of the narrator’s wife, her second marriage is simply another lonely episode in an existence bereft of a loving larger community. Robert’s appearance in the couple’s life not only connects the wife to another person and to the outside world but also forces open the narrator’s barren world and peoples it. Almost immediately upon
Robert’s appearance, the narrator stops thinking of the three of them as separate beings and instead describes them moving through the house as a “little group.” Furthermore, Robert’s presence sparks the first stirrings of empathy in the narrator. Although the narrator retains a cruel edge (he demeans Robert’s marriage and silently refers to his loss of Beulah as “pathetic”), when he imagines Robert’s life and love, he identifies with another person as he seldom has before. The most profound yearning for and discovery of a community comes at the end of the story, when Robert and the narrator draw a cathedral together. After trying to insulate himself from Robert by drinking scotch, smoking pot, and watching television, the narrator connects with Robert physically, emotionally, and imaginatively in this act of creation. In this moment, the narrator makes contact not only with Robert but also with a larger imagined community, and the theme of community is most compellingly expressed in the titular symbol of the cathedral. A cathedral is a place where the devout congregate and pray together, and therefore it stands as a powerful symbol of community and belief, two things the narrator lacks. Indeed, after drawing the cathedral with Robert, the narrator feels as if he has been liberated; the walls of his insulated dwelling have been knocked down, and the narrator confesses that “I didn’t feel like I was inside anything.” This imaginative exercise, then, has transformed the narrator’s isolated, nuclear home into a new space without barriers. The symbol of the cathedral becomes doubly potent when we realize that, “[t]he building of a cathedral, especially in the Middle Ages, was a project in which the entire town took part.” A community is necessary to forge the physical structure that will then, in turn, strengthen that community and bind it to a wider world, just as Robert, in attempting to heal his own loneliness, draws the two separate members of this marriage into communion with himself, each other, and the world. Cara McClintock-Walsh
Spirituality in “Cathedral”
Throughout his career, Raymond Carver was often accused of denying his fictional characters contact with a spiritual dimension that might offer them
264â•…â•… Carver, Raymond some relief from their otherwise stultifying and stale lives. Carver himself, whose fiction was viewed as the near-perfect embodiment of minimalism, disliked the term minimalist because to him it suggested a smallness of vision, a diminishment of his characters’ experiences. But both the critics and Carver recognized “Cathedral” as a breakthrough; in this story, the otherwise typical Carver narrator makes contact with a spiritual dimension that enlarges his world and his vision, if only for a moment. The narrator is the only character in this story who, until the very last moments of “Cathedral,” shows no interest whatsoever in transcending his everyday life. Robert, the blind man who will lead the narrator to his epiphany, is characterized by his devotion to others: he works in “the county socialservice department”; in his hobby as a ham radio operator, he cultivates connections among others; and through his taped correspondences, Robert acts as the narrator’s wife’s lifeline to a larger, emotionally receptive world. In her first marriage, the narrator’s wife had experienced a spiritual crisis that reached its explosive expression in her unsuccessful suicide attempt. In her second marriage, the narrator’s wife attempts to find deeper meaning in her life through her poetry, which she composes “after something really important [has] happened to her.” Both Robert and the narrator’s wife express and enact a longing for contact with the greater world, and their search for deeper meaning in their lives could be read as evidence of a spiritual quest. The narrator, on the other hand, shows only a desire to escape his life by retreating further into his own deeply entrenched alienation. He soaks himself in Scotch (drinking is, he admits, one of his hobbies) and shrouds himself in a haze of marijuana smoke in order to insulate himself from contact with his wife, Robert, or anyone else who might bump up against his life. While it may seem that the substances in the narrator’s life could act as social lubricants, instead they serve to reinforce a wall between himself and the larger world. If alcohol and pot facilitate conversation rather than impede it, the narrator turns on the television as a way to erect a second barrier between himself and others. Although the narrator evinces no clear desire to experience anything other than his life as it is,
Carver does subtly suggest that the narrator occasionally recognizes, or at least feels, his own spiritual emptiness. When the three characters sit down to eat dinner, the narrator, to his wife’s shock, delivers a mock prayer over the food: “Now let us pray.╯.╯.╯. Pray the phone won’t ring and the food doesn’t get cold.” But immediately after this glib moment, the narrator and his companions eat so voraciously as to suggest that their hunger is not just physical but perhaps indicative of a deeper, spiritual hunger. The hunger reveals itself as specifically spiritual when the narrator and Robert find themselves alone after dinner. When the narrator’s usual barriers (alcohol, television) fail him, he is able for the first time in the story to make physical, emotional, and spiritual contact with another person. Right before his epiphanic moment, the narrator reaches for his drink, only to find it empty; when he turns on the television, the only program on (one about cathedrals) does not distract the two men but instead draws them into a conversation that delves into the spiritual realm they have so far avoided. The narrator briefly but significantly confesses his loneliness to Robert and reveals to the reader that he is terrified by the emptiness that confronts him at night. Later, when the television program inspires Robert to pointedly ask the narrator if he is religious, the narrator does not embrace his unbelief but instead expresses sorrow and uncertainty: “I guess I don’t believe in it. In anything. Sometimes it’s hard. You know what I’m saying?” The television program introduces the spiritual into the conversation and ushers into the narrative an event that grants the narrator a profound moment of transcendence. In the closing moments of the story, the narrator is no longer disgusted by Robert’s blindness; he instead reacts to Robert with empathy, and Robert and the narrator attempt to occupy the same world in a moment of spiritual enlargement when they draw a cathedral together. We must pay attention to the subject of the television show and to the drawing. Carver could have had the men draw anything together (a dog, a lamp, a skyscraper); in choosing a cathedral, a site of worship that is built by and for a community, he deliberately draws attention to the spiritual aspect of communion that the men experience. In the process
My Ántoniaâ•…â•… 265 of helping Robert “see” what a cathedral is, the narrator opens himself up to a different view of humanity and the world. Indeed, the blind man helps the narrator experience first empathy and then profound insight when, after allowing the narrator to draw a cathedral for/with him, he instructs the narrator to close his eyes. This act, one of empathetic blindness, helps the narrator transcend his own small vision of life and instead experience a vision that recognizes and embraces a common humanity. Indeed, in the last moments of the story, when the liquor supply is dry and the television has gone to snow, the narrator moves from blindness to insight, from the individual to the collective, from nothing to the last spoken word in the story: “something.” Ultimately, we cannot know if the narrator’s epiphany is the result of real human connection or copious amounts of alcohol; we cannot know if the narrator’s vision will be a temporary one or a lasting, meaningful one. But in the final moments of the story, we can see that the geography of the narrator’s life now includes a spiritual terrain. Cara McClintock-Walsh
CATHER, WILLAâ•… My Ántoniaâ•… (1918)
Published in 1918, My Ántonia was one of two novels that established Willa Cather (1873–1947) as a major American novelist of the 20th century; the other was O Pioneers! Set in southern Nebraska, the novel draws on the author’s memories of an ideal life on the prairie. The novel’s protagonist, Ántonia, is an immigrant from Bohemia; she represents the values of innocence, hard work, integrity, and generosity. Ántonia Shimerda Cusak and Jim Burden, the narrator, become friends because Ántonia’s parents and Jim’s grandparents are neighbors. As a 14-yearold, Ántonia emigrates from Bohemia with her family; Jim, a 10-year-old, comes from Virginia to live with his grandparents after his parents die. One family is striving while the other is well-established. Jim becomes a successful lawyer and moves to New York, yet he keeps his childhood memories of Ántonia alive. Indeed, their friendship thrives even though their backgrounds are different, and when they see each other again after 20 years, their feel-
ings of love and mutual admiration are stronger than ever. My Ántonia depicts the day-to-day life of the early pioneers—their hardships, traditions, successes, and social assumptions. Narrated as a succession of stories within stories, tied by the universal theme of children coming of age and discovering themselves as they experience the joys and sorrows of life, the novel celebrates friendship as the most noble of human qualities. My Ántonia, among its other themes, is about the healing powers of past memories and the awesome sense of freedom and beauty created by the forces of nature. This pastoral novel successfully combines realistic vignettes of prairie life, the connection between nature and human struggle, and the romantic idealism of a young man. Maria Ornella Treglia
Memory in My Ántonia
The power of memory to keep relationships alive and to make up for the disappointments of life is a central theme in My Ántonia. Willa Cather, the author, supposedly runs into an old friend, Jim Burden, on a train crossing Iowa. Jim recounts to her his memories of a Bohemian immigrant girl, Ántonia, with whom Jim and Cather grew up on the Nebraskan prairie. Jim is an accomplished lawyer who is apparently unhappily married, and he enjoys writing down what he remembers of Ántonia. Cather expresses interest in reading his recollections, and a few months later, Jim brings his portfolio of memories to the author’s apartment in New York. The title on the portfolio is Ántonia, but he is not satisfied with it and makes it My Ántonia. This introduction prepares the reader for Jim’s subjective recollection of growing up on the prairie and of his encounter with Ántonia 20 years later. The novel is divided into five books, and each one could stand by itself. The connecting thread is the narrator’s nostalgic tone. Although the love between Ántonia and Jim does not develop beyond that of a platonic friendship, it is nevertheless a profoundly loving relationship that enriches their childhood and adult lives. Jim cherishes the memories of a childhood spent on the prairie with Ántonia as his playmate. He is
266â•…â•… Cather, Willa very much affected by the way she treats him. For example, he is hurt when she regards him as a young boy (he was four years younger), and he is extremely proud when he kills a big rattlesnake, not so much because he receives the admiration of friends and neighbors but because he gets Ántonia’s approval. She now sees him as her equal. Even the tragic event of the suicide of Ántonia’s father and his funeral conjure up for Jim memories of a mystical sense of connectedness with the dead man’s soul. Ántonia was her father’s favorite child, and Jim had developed a special closeness with him because they both shared a genuine love for Ántonia. That memories are meant to keep the feelings Ántonia and Jim have for each other alive is made most explicit in chapter 4 of book 4 when Jim and Ántonia meet for the last time before a 20-year hiatus. Jim vows to himself that he will always carry with him “the closest, realest face, under all the shadows of women’s faces, at the very bottom of [his] memory,” and Ántonia reassures him that even if he does not come back to visit, “[he’s] here, like [her] father. So [she] won’t be lonesome.” Their shared memories accompany Jim during his long trips across the country as a railways legal counsel. In the ensuing 20 years, Ántonia marries a fellow Bohemian and has 10 children with him. Her life is hard, and she is not wealthy, but she and her husband manage to keep a flourishing farm and a lively family. Jim seems to avoid going to see Ántonia because he is afraid that reality will mar his memories of her. However, when he finally meets her again, he notes that although she has lost her youth and most of her teeth, she has not lost her “inner glow.” Jim, therefore, is able to reconcile the past and the present and is reassured that Ántonia, like himself, cherishes their childhood memories so much that her children seem to already know him. Another interesting aspect of how Cather treats the theme of memory is that the past and the present are intertwined: While memories bring solace to the disappointments of life, they, in turn, are colored by the present. In fact, Jim’s recollections are at times exaggerated and romanticized, as in this poetic description of Ántonia’s eyes: “They were big and warm and full of light, like the sun shining on brown pools in the wood.” He idealizes Ántonia
as a figure out of a fairy tale, the “fairest of them all,” embodying the qualities of a pioneer woman, strong and hardworking, spontaneous, generous, and caring. Jim is aware that his writing is made up of memories tinged with his feelings and reflections; thus, he titles the manuscript My Ántonia, instead of simply Ántonia. The nostalgic tone in My Ántonia is a reminder that the past can never be truly recaptured, yet it is so much part of a person’s life that it cannot be forgotten. Only by reconciling the past with the present can the characters in Cather’s novel find the peace of mind and happiness that they yearn for. Maria Ornella Treglia
Nature in My Ántonia
In this pastoral novel, nature—the landscape and the changing of the seasons—serves not only as a setting but also as an expression of human feelings and as a foreshadowing of future events. When Jim Burden arrives at his grandparents’ farm, his sense of identity is reflected in the vast, impersonal landscape. He has never seen land without mountain ridges, hills, creeks, or trees, and as he notes, “there was nothing but land.” He is absorbed by it: “I felt erased, blotted out.” Its vastness is overwhelming to this 10-year-old boy whose mother and father had both died within the past year. Jim’s identification with the barren, winter landscape is a way to grieve for the loss of his parents and portrays his lack of hope, “If we never arrived anywhere, it did not matter.” The life he had known is over; he is starting a new one and has no idea of what is to come. He feels small and insignificant against the vastness of nature. Jim is welcomed by his grandparents, and as he gets settled at the farm, the landscape takes on the meaning of freedom and contentment that life on the prairie represents. On the second day at the farm, Jim goes to the garden with his grandmother and decides to stay there a little longer. He sits down in the middle of the garden, leans his back against a pumpkin, and observes that happiness is “to be dissolved into something complete and great.” These words, which were later carved on Willa Cather’s tombstone, reveal how important the author thought it was to be in harmony with nature.
My Ántoniaâ•…â•… 267 Indeed, Jim seems to find peace, happiness, and freedom by identifying with nature and feeling as if he is one with it. The sunflower-bordered roads that surrounded the prairie are another symbol of the freedom inspired by nature. Fuchs, a handyman on the farm owned by Jim’s grandparents, tells Jim that when the Mormon men left Missouri to escape religious persecution, they scattered sunflower seeds so that the next summer, when the children and women followed, they had the sunflower trail to guide them to their freedom. As an adult writing about his childhood, Jim is aware that Fuchs’s story is a legend, but he still prefers to remember the sunflowers as “the road to freedom.” After three years, Jim and his grandparents move to the town of Black Hawk, and here it is the river, which runs about two miles south of their house, that takes on the meaning of freedom. “That river was to be my compensation for the lost freedom of the farming country,” he writes. Nature—especially changes in the weather—is also employed by Cather to foretell events. For example, the suicide of Mr. Shimerda, Ántonia’s father, is foreshadowed in book 1, chapter 6, when Jim and Ántonia are outdoors on a splendid autumn afternoon, “a day of amber sunlight, but there was a shiver of coming winter in the air.” The land is magnificent and imbued with spiritual qualities, “like the bush that burned with fire and was not consumed,” but the arrival of winter is foreboding, “two long black shadows flitted before us or after us.” Ántonia is shivering in her thin cotton dress, and so they nestle together on the sun-warmed ground, where they find an insect that is struggling to survive the first cold. Then they see Ántonia’s father, who gives Ántonia, his favorite child, “a wintry flicker of a smile.” She shows her father the dying insect, and Jim notices how full of sadness and “pity for things” his smile is, an image he will never forget. Mr. Shimerda kills himself a few months later on the second day of the worst blizzard in 10 years. The funeral arrangements are delayed because of the snow, another example of the weather reinforcing the main characters’ feelings. In this case, it expresses Ántonia’s grief and foreshadows her hard work on the farm that lies ahead.
In My Ántonia, detailed descriptions of nature, including the landscape, the changing of seasons, and the unpredictable winter storms, portray the main characters’ psychological states of mind and foreshadow major events. The natural environment, which is part of Jim’s life on the prairie, represents “the edge of the world,” the last frontier, and the values of freedom and happiness that are traditionally associated with it. Maria Ornella Treglia
Social Class in My Ántonia
Social class distinction is a subtle yet pervasive theme in My Ántonia. It is embedded in the friendship and tension between the newly arrived European immigrants and their American neighbors. Although Jim’s grandparents are welcoming and generous toward their new neighbors, they maintain a certain distance from the Shimerdas. The Burdens feel socially superior to the newcomers. Jim describes Ántonia’s father as a gentle, noble-looking man, with a dignified manner and not used to the hard work of the farm. In his own country, he was a skilled artisan and enjoyed playing music with his friends. Yet Mr. Shimerda, sensing that he is being socially ranked by the Burdens, feels the need to explain that in the old country, “he made good wages, and his family were respected.” While the Burdens ask Mr. Shimerda to stay for Christmas dinner and enjoy his company, they do not extend an invitation to the rest of his family. Mrs. Shimerda is obviously not as refined as her husband and is greedy and envious, which gives the Burdens an excuse to keep a distance from their neighbors. For example, when Mrs. Shimerda gives Jim’s grandmother the most valuable thing she has, dried mushroom chips, it is meant as a gesture of deep appreciation. However, when Jim’s grandmother gets home, she throws away the chips without giving it much thought. She does not trust the foreign substance, and she does not recognize Mrs. Shimerda’s gesture. In spite of her religious piety and kindness, Jim’s grandmother looks down in the immigrant woman and does not accept her as her equal. Jim highlights social class differences between first-generation immigrant girls who work for families in Black Hawk and the girls from the town. He
268â•…â•… Cather, Willa describes the country girls as lively and engaging, having “a positive carriage and freedom of movement,” while the Black Hawk girls lead more sedentary lives and are “listless and dull, cut off below the shoulders.” Jim enjoys the company of the “early awakened,” vibrant country girls and does not agree with the townspeople who regard them as “a menace to the social order.” He predicts that these girls will be successful in life and someday will become the mistresses of Black Hawk, but it will take a while for the conventional values of Black Hawk to change. Even Frances Harling, a woman ahead of her times who, on various occasions, has expressed sympathy for the country girls, criticizes Jim for putting a kind of glamor over them. The Vanni tent, a temporary dancing pavilion for the summer months, is one of a few events to threaten the town’s social stability. As Jim puts it, at the tent the country girls and the town boys are on “neutral ground.” However, much to his disappointment, the affections that start on the dancing floor do not develop because the town boys will ultimately abide by their parents’ expectations and social codes. Although Jim’s grandparents come across as more open-minded than most townspeople, they are conformists, as discussed above, when it comes to social class. The grandfather does not approve of dancing, but if Jim wants to dance, he can go to the Masonic Hall, “among the people we knew.” Ironically, these are the people Jim avoids socializing with. When the grandmother discovers that Jim is sneaking out of the house to go dancing with the country girls, she is evidently troubled, and when Jim asks her about it, she says tearfully that people are criticizing Jim and that it is not fair to his grandparents. Thus, Jim’s socializing with the working class is perceived as an embarrassment to his folks. Ultimately, Jim, in spite of his criticism of Black Hawk social conservatism and his strong bond with Ántonia, Lena, and the other country girls, is not able to set himself free from those mores. Otherwise, why does he not ask Ántonia to marry him? When he sees Ántonia after Larry Donovan has deserted her, Jim declares his love to her: “I’d have liked to have you for a sweetheart, or a wife .╯.╯. you influence my likes and dislikes, all my tastes, hundreds of times. You really are a part of me.” However, he
moves on with his life and does not see Ántonia again for 20 years. Cather must have been well aware of the rigidity surrounding social structure among the prairie dwellers. She wrote an exceptional novel, full of nature images and romantic ideas, yet she felt she could not romanticize the issue of social class. Maria Ornella Treglia
CATHER, WILLAâ•… O Pioneers!â•… (1913)
Alexandra Bergson is the central character of Willa Cather’s O Pioneers!, a portrait of early 20th-century life on the Nebraska prairie. Despite being the only girl in a family of four children, her strength of will coupled with her keen feeling for the land and its potential lead her father to name her as his successor. Alexandra makes a success of the land and purchases the surrounding acreage, including the farm once owned by her childhood friend Carl Linstrum and his family, portioning out lots for lease. Frank and Marie Shabata, a young Bohemian couple, lease the Linstrum farm. Once married, Alexandra’s older brothers, Lou and Oscar, are each allotted a tract of land. Alexandra has plans for her younger brother, Emil, outside of a career in farming. Emil is the first in the family to attend college and goes on to study law. He returns during academic breaks to help Alexandra tend the land, and it is in doing this that a fatal attraction forms between Emil and Marie. Frank discovers the mutual attraction between Emil and his wife, and in a fit of blind jealousy, he shoots and kills the couple as they lie in the grass. Alexandra blames herself for not noticing the attraction between Emil and Marie. Her devotion to the land stemmed from wanting a better life for Emil, but with his death she finds it not only pointless but painful to remain on the land. She leaves everything behind in an attempt to make a new life with Carl in Alaska. Elizabeth K. Haller
Nature in O Pioneers!
Alexandra Bergson, the central and matriarchal figure of Willa Cather’s O Pioneers! is most closely associated with nature throughout the novel. In her early 20s she is chosen by her dying father over her
O Pioneers!â•…â•… 269 two older brothers, Lou and Oscar, to take over the family’s ailing Nebraska farm upon his death. Alexandra’s strong will and intelligence in matters dealing with the land is evident to her father, for she had always followed the current market and learned from both the errors and the successes of the neighboring farmers. She wholeheartedly accepts the task out of respect for her father’s wishes but also as a means of ensuring a better life for her younger brother, Emil. She is adamant that Emil be given the opportunity that she and her older brothers did not have—the opportunity to better himself through a college education. Alexandra knows that making a success of their farm will ensure a future for Emil that does not involve working the land. After the death of their father and the subsequent death of their mother, the Bergsons face hardships on the farm as a severe drought sets in. Alexandra feels herself drawn to the land more than ever at this time as she recognizes the beauty it holds under its hardened exterior. She regards the land as a living element that needs devotion and understanding to flourish, and she thinks of its history as beginning in the heart of a man or a woman. Those whose land had not prospered, she thinks, simply lacked the desire or the capacity to regard the land as anything more than something that could or could not be controlled. Alexandra refuses to give up on the land as those around her are doing and instead decides to put her trust in its capabilities. Ever perseverant, rather than selling off the farm as Lou and Oscar advise, she borrows the funds to purchase the foreclosed and abandoned farms that surround her property. This decision proves fruitful as the drought comes to an end and the land prospers. As a result of her inherent attachment to the land, she is attuned to what is best for it and ultimately finds success as a female head of a farming community. With this accomplishment, however, comes the loss of that for which she pursued success in the first place—Emil’s future. It is not only nature as it pertains to land that dominates in the novel but nature as it pertains to humans as well. For all her foresight in making a success of the family farm, Alexandra is so deeply involved with what is best for the land that she is oblivious to the acts of human nature that surround
her, most notably that of a deep and requited attraction between Emil and Marie, a childhood friend of the Bergsons who is now the wife of the neighboring farmer, Frank Shabata. It is Emil’s and Marie’s attraction borne out in a painfully silent desire for one another that Alexandra only recognizes in retrospect as a natural development of their time together. On Emil’s breaks from college, Alexandra asks that he tend the areas surrounding the Shabata farm, as she has leased the farm to Frank, and perform simple chores for Marie. As a result, Emil and Marie interact on an almost daily basis. Alexandra does not presume impropriety since Marie is a married woman, and she does not suspect that Marie or Emil would violate that marital bond. But human nature takes over as the temptation of their desire proves unbearable, and they give in to their love for one another. It is human nature as well that brings on the overpowering feelings of betrayal, jealousy, and anger that lead Frank to blindly kill Marie and Emil when he finds them embracing in the field. Alexandra partially blames herself in not recognizing the human nature of a budding love between these two young people, and she discovers that she has devoted her life to the land at the expense of this recognition, even to the extent of denying herself a personal life. Although she is attuned to the needs of the land, it is human nature that wins out in the end as Alexandra leaves behind all that she has strived for to marry Carl Linstrum, her childhood friend and lifelong confidant, and travel with him to Alaska. She realizes, however, that she can never truly leave the farm behind, for her heart is entwined in its beauty and will always remain with the land. Elizabeth K. Haller
Responsibility in O Pioneers!
The theme of responsibility in Willa Cather’s O Pioneers! is exemplified by two female characters in the novel—Alexandra Bergson and Marie Shabata. Alexandra’s responsibility revolves around making a success of the family homestead, whereas Marie’s responsibility revolves around the guilt she associates with marriage. The degree of responsibility felt by each woman, however, has devastating effects on their own lives as well as on the lives of others.
270â•…â•… Cather, Willa Alexandra, Cather’s central character, is allotted the responsibility early in life of maintaining the family farmstead. She strives to make a success of the farm in order to provide her family—herself and her three brothers—with a sense of security, including ensuring that her elder brothers, Lou and Oscar, are given enough land to provide for their own families. While providing security is imperative, Alexandra primarily strives to make a success of the land to ensure that her younger brother, Emil, is granted a life where he will never have to resort to making a career out of working the land. Since childhood, Alexandra has assumed responsibility for Emil’s future, looking on him as the hope for the future—the Bergson with a true opportunity of succeeding off the farm. She had witnessed the repercussions that working the land had on the life of her father, her mother, and her two elder brothers, and she fully intends to save Emil from such physical and emotional hardship. Once she makes a success of the land, Alexandra’s efforts serve to provide for Emil’s education and give him a chance at a prestigious career in law. Emil shows his appreciation toward Alexandra by returning to the farm during breaks from his studies, assisting in maintaining portions of their land that she has leased to the public—including the land leased to Frank and Marie Shabata. Whereas Alexandra’s responsibility pertains to making a success of the land, Marie’s responsibility pertains to a sense of guilt over the type of man her husband, Frank, has become since their initial meeting. Marie feels responsible for Frank’s change in attitude and physical appearance. Prior to their marriage—during their courtship—Frank held his head high and walked with a light step, but his head now hangs low, and his walk has become heavy; the harshness of life now weighs on him. He spends a majority of his time away from home in an attempt to make a success of the leased land apportioned to them by Alexandra. Just as Alexandra’s motivation in making a success of the land lies outside of herself, Frank’s motivation rests in his desire to provide a brighter future for Marie. Frank’s selfless motivation, however, weighs heavy on Marie; she does not wish to be responsible for the demise of Frank’s lighthearted nature, but she is fully aware that his devo-
tion to her is destroying the man he once was. As a result, she is diligent in her manner toward Frank in an effort to lift his spirits and transform him back into the man he was during their courtship. Because she knows of Frank’s frequent absences, Alexandra often asks Emil to assist Marie at the Shabata homestead through tending the grass and the plants or performing general carpentry work around the home. His recurrent presence at the Shabata farm eventually leads to an attraction between Emil and Marie that has tragic consequences. Alexandra maintains a sense of responsibility for the murder of Emil and Marie in that she threw the two of them together by assigning Emil the task of assisting Marie in her husband’s absence. Alexandra’s focus has been on the land for so long that she is ignorant of human nature. As such, she also maintains a sense of responsibility for Frank’s murder of Emil and Marie, believing that she provided the reason for his blind, jealous rage when she ignorantly placed the two lovers in a position that invoked intimacy. Alexandra’s sense of responsibility toward Emil led to her fixation on the land, a passion that ultimately destroyed the person whose future it was meant to sustain. Likewise, although Marie’s sense of responsibility rests in her guilt over the alteration in Frank’s lighthearted nature, her adulterous actions ultimately lead to the destruction of his life altogether through incarceration and the knowledge that he caused the death of the wife whom he adored and whose future he had striven to enrich. Elizabeth K. Haller
Suffering in O Pioneers!
Suffering is prevalent in Willa Cather’s O Pioneers! The Bergsons and the Shabatas—the novel’s two primary families—are at times both overwhelmed by and indebted to the land, which ultimately leads to the demise of all that they have striven to maintain. John Bergson, the patriarch of the family central to the novel, strove for 11 years to make a success of his land on the Nebraska prairie of the early 20th century. A series of hardships befell his land and his family—natural disasters, droughts, deaths. The emotional toll of his inability to succeed despite
The Canterbury Talesâ•…â•… 271 his best efforts, coupled with the physical exertion involved in working what he has come to view as hopeless land are contributing factors in his early death. Alexandra, Bergson’s sole daughter, witnesses her father’s suffering and is determined to make a success of the land that her father died attempting to master. This determination is strengthened by her desire to offer her youngest brother, Emil, the opportunity of a university education, resulting in a better life off the farm. Her determination in making a success of the land results in the exclusion of all else—including suffering the loss of love and companionship. It is evident that there is a mutual respect and attraction between Alexandra and Carl Linstrum. Childhood friends, Alexandra and Carl look to one another for support throughout the hardships felt by both of their families in working the land. Seeking a better life, Carl’s family leaves the prairie, separating Alexandra from the only person she has come to rely on for friendship and companionship. Sixteen years pass before Carl’s return, both of them still suffering from the loneliness brought on by their separation. Carl proposes marriage to Alexandra and a new life off the farm. Although she is tempted to accept his offer and put an end to her intense loneliness, she is aware that she has lived too long for the land to turn her back on it now. Additionally, she does not wish to suffer the imminent separation from Emil that would result from her marriage to Carl, so once again, she loses him as he sets forth alone in search of a better life. Alexandra’s devotion to the land causes her to turn her back on a chance at happiness with Carl and choose instead to continue in loneliness. Additionally, her devotion blinds her to human nature as she fails to see the suffering felt by both Emil and Marie Shabata in their burgeoning and forbidden attraction. Emil and Marie suffer in their love for one another. Because Marie is a married woman, Emil is aware that he must contain his feelings for her and behave as though her attraction toward him is unrequited. Just as Emil suffers in his inability to express his true feelings, Marie suffers in her inability to act on her attraction to Emil—held back by the fact that she is married. Although her love for Emil is
genuine, she feels an intense shame in being a married woman who pines for another man. Marie does not wish to cause her husband, Frank, a moment’s suffering, yet she also does not wish to suffer in her love for Emil by remaining silent. Emil and Marie ultimately decide to act on their attraction, leading to their deaths and to the demise of what their families had worked so hard to maintain. Initially, Frank suffers in his jealousy regarding his suspicion over Marie’s betrayal. Once that suspicion is confirmed, however, his jealousy turns to blind rage as he shoots and kills the lovers while they lie in the grass. Their deaths result in the end of life as Frank and Alexandra had known it. Once he acts upon his rage, Frank immediately suffers in his guilt over killing Marie and Emil, realizing that if he could relive that moment, he would walk away and end their silent suffering, leaving them to their happiness. Though incarcerated, Frank vows that if he were set free, he would leave Nebraska and never work the land again. Like Frank, Alexandra suffers in her guilt. She blames herself in not noticing and putting an end to the attraction between Marie and Emil. Once the cause of Alexandra’s devotion to the land is destroyed, she takes Carl up on his earlier offer of marriage, leaving the land she has worked so diligently to maintain. Elizabeth K. Haller
CHAUCER, GEOFFREYâ•… The Canterbury Talesâ•… (ca. 1380s–1400)
The Canterbury Tales, composed sometime between the late 1380s and Geoffrey Chaucer’s death in 1400, is arguably one of the most innovative narrative works in English literary history. Drawing on, and elaborately reworking, a wide range of sources as diverse as classical myths, saints’ lives, romances and beast fables, The Canterbury Tales has, in turn, influenced and inspired countless works in different media, from Shakespeare’s plays to postmodern films. The Canterbury Tales is a collection of stories held together by the narrative frame of a pilgrimage to the shrine of Thomas Becket in Canterbury in the course of which the pilgrims, a cross section of medieval society, engage in a storytelling
272â•…â•… Chaucer, Geoffrey contest. This framing device allows Chaucer (ca. 1342–1400) to bring together storytellers from all walks of life and thereby to explore different points of view and various forms of cultural expression. Among the storytellers, who are introduced by vivid and detailed sketches in what has become known as the “General Prologue,” are representatives of the emerging middle classes and of the three traditional medieval “estates” (nobility, clergy, and peasantry), and the text has been related to the popular medieval genre of the estates satire (wherein society is examined according to its hierarchies). Significantly, however, it differs from this in that the various storytellers are not only types but also individuals. In fact, the dramatic tension between the storytellers, acted out in the prologue as well as in the dialogues that link the individual tales, contributes as much to the enthralling overall effect of the Canterbury Tales as the structural tension between the various genres Chaucer experiments with, among them romance, fabliau, sermon, and moral treatise. Annette Kern-Stähler
Gender in The Canterbury Tales
Over the past two decades, gender issues have become increasingly central to literary criticism on Chaucer. Among the reasons why The Canterbury Tales has proven fertile ground for gender approaches is the diversity of the storytellers, a situation that offers multiple constructions of masculinity and femininity. As the narrator acutely observes, “[d] iverse folk diversely they seyde” (1.3,857). Significantly, the voices of women (albeit doubly filtered by the male narrator and the male poet), who in the dominant medieval discourse were encouraged to be silent, are included in the storytelling. With its numerous, often conflicting, voices, The Canterbury Tales lays open the tensions within medieval gender discourse. Thus, the reciprocity in malefemale relationships posited in “The Franklin’s Tale” (“Wommen, of kynde, desiren libertee, / And nat to been constreyned as a thral; / And so doon men, if I sooth seyen shal” [5.768–770]) offers an alternative to the wifely obedience propagated in “The Clerk’s Tale,” in which Griselidis patiently submits to her husband’s will (“Ye been oure lord; dooth with youre owene thyng / Right as yow list; axeth no reed at
me” [4.652–653]). Chaucer’s gender constructions have been shown to be closely connected with genre. Thus, the desirable woman in the fabliau told by the Miller, the animal-like Alisoun with her flirtatious eye (“likerous ye” [1.3,244]), is an antithesis to the desirable woman in “The Knight’s Tale,” who, in line with the courtly love tradition of romance, is worshipped from a distance (1.1,074ff.). Arguably the greatest challenge to the dominant discourse surrounding femininity is “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue,” in which antifeminist and antimatrimonial arguments and commonplaces that circulated widely in the Middle Ages are put into the mouth of a woman who pits her own “experience” against the bookish “auctoritee” of the clerks (3.1) and who twists the misogynous texts read to her by her fifth husband, the Oxford clerk Jenkyn, to serve her own purposes. It cannot be denied, however, that the Wife of Bath, boasting of the female powers to deceive and to lie (“half so boldely kan ther no man / Swere and lyen, as a womman kan” [3.227–228]), endorses the antifeminist stereotypes assembled in Jenkyn’s “Book of wikked wyves” (3.685) In fact, inflicting “peyne” and “wo” on her husband (3.384), she embodies what this book warns against. While this has dented the image of Chaucer as “women’s friend,” “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue” is widely praised for revealing the ways in which gender is a social construction, not a fixed, inborn trait. Referring to the Aesopian fable of the painting of the lion, in which a lion suggests to a painter that his picture of a man killing a lion would look different if painted by the lion, the Wife of Bath draws attention to the point of view from which gender is constructed: “Who peyntede the leon, tel me who? / By God, if women hadde writen stories, / As clerkes han withinne hire oratories, / They wolde han writen of men moore wikkednesse / Than al the mark of Adam may redresse” (3.692–696). The category of masculinity in The Canterbury Tales shows that the notion prevalent in our day— that gender and gender identity are flexible and negotiable and that gender positions may be taken up by someone of either sex—is part of Chaucer’s construction of gender. While women are sometimes masculinized in The Canterbury Tales, as when Donegild in “The Man of Law’s Tale” is said to
The Canterbury Talesâ•…â•… 273 exhibit “mannish” treachery (2.781–782), it is more often men who exhibit traits that are considered feminine. The Host likens the Clerk to a newlywed “mayde” in his riding behaviour (4.2–3), and in “The Knight’s Tale,” Theseus’s masculinity incorporates pity (1.954–955), a trait normally assigned by medieval gender discourse to women. Assumptions of a clear-cut gender division are challenged most forcefully by the portrait of the Pardoner, a figure hotly debated in gender and queer studies. The Pardoner’s high voice (1.688) and effeminate looks (“No berde hadde he / ne nevere sholde have” [1.689]) make the narrator indecisive as to whether he was “a geldyng or a mare” (1.691), the first of which has been glossed as “eunuch,” the second as “effeminate male” or “effeminate homosexual.” And it is not least the complexity, ambiguity, and fluctuation of gender constructs in The Canterbury Tales that make this work so appealing to us today. Annette Kern-Stähler
Grief in The Canterbury Tales
In the past two decades, emotions have been increasingly approached from a perspective that acknowledges cultures vary about which emotions are appropriate to particular situations and social roles. As cultural practices, literature and art have the potential of both disseminating dominant constructions of emotions and of challenging them. Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales emphasizes both the imposition of standards of decorum for the expression of emotion and the transgression of these limitations. The exposition of different occasions for and types of grief and of different ways of grieving and mourning are explored by Chaucer in the very first of the Canterbury Tales. “The Knight’s Tale,” in accordance with the social standing of its narrator, is concerned with highly ritualized court culture, but it is in some respects also an exposition of various types of grief which resurface in different genres and narrative contexts in other stories in the Tales—frequently from another, often contrasting, perspective. With repeated reference to Fortune “and hire false wheel” (1.925), grief intrudes in many ways in “The Knight’s Tale”: the grief of the Theban widows whose husbands have been left unburied; the empa-
thetic grief of the knightly Theseus, who then sets out to redress the iniquitous injustice (and whose susceptibility to grief tends to feminize him, in contrast to the Amazon queen he marries); the grief of the captive; the ritualistic grief in the coded system of courtly love, which produces symptoms of illness; the grief of those who feel betrayed by a friend and relative; the grief at the death of a friend; and, finally, the grief for the hero who, contrasting the beginning of the tale, is buried in full state and mourned by the whole populace. Changes of perspective occur, for instance, when, in “The Franklin’s Tale,” Arveragus’s grief over the unattainability of Dorigen moves her to pity him and to accept him as her husband. Within the same tale, this form of empathy is questioned when the now married Dorigen once again succumbs to pity toward another man, which makes her set him a seemingly impossible task. But grief and despair multiply when Aurelius succeeds against all odds, and the ideals of courtly love are subverted when Arveragus urges her to make good on her word, and when Aurelius, subject to all the well-known symptoms of suffering for his love, finally releases Dorigen from her vow. While Arveragus is away, Dorigen mourns his absence as if he were dead: “she moorneth, waketh, wayleth, fasteth, pleyneth” (5.819). She thus conforms to the model of wifely behavior as prescribed in the dominant medieval discourse, which considered grief for an absent husband a wifely virtue. Another model of wifely virtue, as the Host understands it, is provided by “The Clerk’s Tale.” Dorigen’s excessive grief may be contrasted with the suppression of grief and the patient suffering of Griselidis in the face of the ordeals set her by her husband. He tests her by pretending to have their children killed and apparently getting married to another woman. Throughout her ordeal, Griselidis acquiesces, surrendering herself completely to the authority of her husband, and does not show any outward signs of grief. “The Clerk’s Tale” is not, however, uncritical of these social constraints, and in the concluding envoy it proposes a role reversal: “Be ay of chiere as light as leef on lynde, / And lat hym care, and wepe, and wrynge, and waille!” (4.1,211–12).
274â•…â•… Chaucer, Geoffrey In contrast to Griselidis’s suppressed grief, the potential emptiness of ritualized mourning is revealed in “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue,” with the Wife of Bath following the outward expressions of grief and ritualized mourning (“As wyves mooten, for it is usage” [3.589]) but privately rejoicing in her recovered freedom after having laid to rest her fourth husband whose “purgatorie” (3.489) on earth she was. She lusts after one of the pall bearers, who will become her fifth husband. As the Wife of Bath is shown to be insincere in her mourning, in “The Nun’s Priests’s Tale,” Chaucer challenges literary conventions of stylized and ritualized expressions of grief (7.3,331–3,354) with much bathos. His parody of Geoffrey de Vinsauf ’s lamentation on the death of Richard I in his handbook on the art of writing poetry (Poetria nova) is a critical comment on the use of the lofty subject for didactic purposes. Going one step further, Chaucer uses the high style of his source to elaborate on a farmyard incident, which, in the end, does not even lead to the death of its protagonist. Here, as well as in the examples cited above and, less conspicuously, in other instances, Chaucer challenges socially and culturally constructed customs of grieving and mourning. Annette Kern-Stähler
Religion in The Canterbury Tales
Religion was an integral part of daily life in 14thcentury England. While it may be difficult nowadays to gauge precisely the relationship between the sacred and the secular in this period of a highly varied religious culture, it may safely be claimed that a religious consciousness suffused all aspects of everyday life. It was shaped and further disseminated by ecclesiastical institutions and various forms of both public and private devotion; by prayers, sermons, religious plays, devotional treatises, meditations, and images; and equally by widespread controversy and debate. References to religion and to religious practices pervade Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. Although in this unfinished work we may look in vain for the exposition of a sustained and coherent religious vision, the narrative frame of the “General Prologue” and most of the individual tales
engage in various ways and on different levels with contemporary religious issues and problems. The situation envisaged by the text of the “General Prologue” is the pilgrimage to the shrine of the martyred Thomas Becket at Canterbury Cathedral. The portrayal of the pilgrims, however, raises doubts as to whether they have set out on their pilgrimage “with ful devout corage” (1.22). For their detailed description, Chaucer used and transformed the conventions of the estates satire, the object of which was to expose the shortcomings of each of the estates (professions or ranks). With the notable exception of the idealized Parson (1.477–528), the ecclesiastics among the pilgrims are praised for attributes and characteristics that are generally deemed inappropriate for their estate. Thus, it would have seemed appropriate for the Prioress to feel compassion with Jesus and his mother rather than, as her portrait in the “General Prologue” emphasizes, with mice and lapdogs (1.143–150), and for the Monk to be keen on praying and studying rather than, as the prologue has it, on hunting and eating (1.166–205). Many of the tales and their prologues directly or indirectly address contemporary religious issues and problems, such as the question about the relative value of “feith” and “werkis” in the “Second Nun’s Prologue” (8.64), and many of them are, in fact, examples of, or variations on, religious genres, adapted by Chaucer to his own purposes within the framework of the tales. Thus, “The Man of Law’s Tale,” for instance, is a hagiographic romance; “The Prioress’s Tale” a “miracle of the Virgin,” a story in which the Virgin Mary miraculously intercedes for someone who has shown devotion to her; “The Pardoner’s Tale” is a sermon, the moral lesson of which is illustrated by an exemplum (short anecdote); “The Parson’s Tale” is a penitential treatise, including an account of the Seven Deadly Sins; and “The Second Nun’s Tale” is a saint’s life—“the lyf of Seinte Cecile,” one of the virgin martyrs venerated in medieval England. The saintly virtues of meekness and patient suffering are also displayed by Custance in “The Man of Law’s Tale,” Virginia in the Physician’s Tale and Griselidis in “The Clerk’s Tale.” Even tales which, like the fabliaux, seem to have nothing to do with religion engage directly or indirectly with religious issues. Thus, the Reeve and the
The Seagullâ•…â•… 275 Shipman talk about church corruption, and “The Miller’s Tale” contains allusions to monastic worship (“And thus lith Alison and Nicholas / In bisynesse of myrthe and of solas, / Til that the belle of laudes gan to rynge, / And freres in the chauncel gonne synge” [1.3,653–3,656) and to lay religious practice (“[Absolon] pleyeth Herodes upon a scaffold hye” [1.3,384). “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue,” too, is replete with scriptural references, and the impact of the church on everyday life is felt in various well-observed details: Her life is structured around “vigilies,” “processiouns,” “pleyes of myracles,” and other religious rituals and observations (3.555–558). In what has become known as Chaucer’s “Retraction,” Chaucer the poet seems to respond to the Parson’s call for penitence. Referring to St Paul’s second letter to Timothy (3:16)—“For oure book seith, ‘Al that is writen is writen for oure doctrine,’ and that is myn entente” (10.1,082)—he ostentatiously revokes and requests God’s forgiveness for “the tales of Caunterbury, thilke that sownen into synne,” along with other works of “worldly vanitees” (10.1,085–1,086), which he juxtaposes to his “bookes of legendes of seintes, and omelies, and moralitee, and devocioun” (10.1,088). Students of The Canterbury Tales, however, are well advised not to divide the tales easily into “good” religious tales and “bad” worldly ones. Since religion was a fabric of everyday life, it is tightly woven into the fabric of Chaucer’s tales—including those that “sownen into synne.” Annette Kern-Stähler
CHEKHOV, ANTONâ•… The Seagullâ•… (1895)
The Seagull, a play in four acts originally produced in St. Petersburg in 1896, bears several hallmarks of Anton Chekhov’s dramatic works. Set on a country estate that is merely a shadow of its former self, populated by a large ensemble of characters struggling to adapt to the changes in Russian society, the action centers on Konstantin Gavrilovich (Treplev), a would-be writer and the son of a famous actress, Irina Nikolayevna (Arkadina). Treplev’s beloved, Nina, an aspiring actress, falls in love with Arkadina’s lover, the famous writer Boris Alekseyevich
(Trigorin), resulting in a short-lived affair that has destructive consequences for both Nina and Treplev. Filling out the cast are Arkadina’s brother, Sorin, the owner of the estate; the charming doctor Dorn; Sorin’s steward, Shamrayev, and his wife, Polina; and their lovelorn daughter, Masha, who attempts to suppress her unrequited desire for Treplev by marrying the unassuming schoolmaster, Medvedenko. Love and loss, avocation and labor, hope and desperation mingle as years pass over the course of the play, and the characters’ efforts to achieve their dreams, both personal and professional, are fraught with complication and disappointment. Even when some achieve their goals—Nina becomes an actress, Treplev a published writer—they do not find happiness, making their “successes” somewhat hollow. Subtitled “A Comedy in Four Acts,” The Seagull challenges established notions of tragedy and comedy: Although it offers no promise of the new beginnings traditionally celebrated at the end of comedies, the stark ending, marked by Treplev’s suicide, lacks the deep gravitas of tragedy. Margaret Savilonis
Hope in The Seagull
The action of Anton Chekhov’s The Seagull begins with a conversation between Masha and her suitor Medvedenko, who asks, “Why do you always wear black?”; Masha’s response, “I am in mourning for my life” (Act 1), serves as a microcosmic embodiment of the human condition as Chekhov explores it in the play. Dissatisfied with life, the characters invest their energy in their hopes for a better future, resulting in a paradox that is central to their struggles: Hope enables people to forge ahead in the face of disappointment, even when they realize that their hopes will not come to fruition, but it simultaneously keeps them trapped because they are so caught up in dreaming about what might someday be that they cannot enjoy what they actually have. Yet for all the sorrow that unfulfilled desires create, the loss of hope is far more debilitating. For some, the longing for love that will never be realized causes sorrow and frustration. At the root of Masha’s unhappiness is her unrequited love for Treplev, the aspiring writer whose own hopes are shaped by his intense love for Nina. Early in the
276â•…â•… Chekhov, Anton play, Masha articulates her plans for abandoning her fantasies and moving forward in a new direction. Yet even after she has married Medvedenko and become a mother, she still longs to be with Treplev. Frustrated by her mother’s attempts to console her, Masha declares, “It’s simply nonsense. Hopeless love—there’s no such thing except in novels. The only thing is you mustn’t let yourself go, and always be expecting something, waiting for the tide to turn.╯.╯.╯. When love plants itself in your heart, you have to clear it out” (Act 4). Yet her actions contradict her pronouncements, as she spends her days and nights at the estate to be near Treplev instead of at her own home with her husband and child, indicating that she retains some small semblance of hope that her deepest desires may yet be achieved. For others, hope provides the courage to take risks. Nina leaves home to pursue her dream of becoming an actress and achieving “resounding fame,” even if it means enduring “poverty, disillusionment, [and] the hatred of [her] family.” In some ways, Nina’s hopes are realized: She does embark on a career on the stage, and she has a love affair with the writer Trigorin. Yet these dreams turn out to be chimeras. She finds not fame or glory as an actress but hard work. Her relationship with Trigorin produces a child, who dies, and Trigorin eventually leaves her, returning to his life with the famous actress, Treplev’s mother, Arkadina. Her hopes dashed, Nina refuses to give up, but she does not simply hold on to old hopes. Rather, she finds new hope, declaring, “I know now, I understand, that in our work .╯.╯. what’s important is not fame, not glory, not the things I used to dream of, but the ability to endure” (Act 4). For Nina, hope is fluid, and it must be so, or she will not be able to go on. Treplev, on the other hand, is unable to adapt, clinging relentlessly to his expectations, which end up destroying him. He, too, achieves his professional goal, becoming a published writer by the end of the play. Yet the work is empty, and the realization of his hopes is not quite as beautiful as the dream. Because he cannot let go of his desire to share his life with Nina, he loses hope, and that proves to be the most detrimental thing of all. When he fails to find a new path, a new hope to pursue, he simply gives up, tearing up all of his manuscripts in a sym-
bolic destruction of his dreams. Despair sets in, and Treplev ends his life. Hope is, in some ways, a panacea for the characters in The Seagull because it allows them to go on even in the face of constant disappointment. Yet hope cannot truly cure all ills; one must come to terms with the inevitable disconnect between expectation and realization in order to move forward. That is not to say that one should give up hoping; indeed, the play suggests that hope is something everyone needs in order to survive, and the loss of hope has profoundly devastating consequences. People need something to dream of, but they also need to be able to go on if the dreams fail. Margaret Savilonis
Love in The Seagull
Love is a driving force in Anton Chekhov’s The Seagull. Early in the play, the revelation of various love triangles generates mild, comic conflict. Yet what is amusing in the beginning of the play is crushing by the end. The heightened emotions of the first act become increasingly intense as the play’s action progresses, and, by the fourth act, the characters’ inability to move forward, hampered by unrealistic expectations and the oppressive yoke of unrequited love, is emotionally, socially, and physically destructive. Set during the summertime on a country estate, the play begins with a light tone, and love takes center stage early on. The pursuit of romance is emphasized by the environment, the sultry weather mirroring the simmering passions of the ensemble cast. The primary focus is the relationship between Treplev, an aspiring writer, and his beloved Nina, an aspiring actress. Treplev’s joyful exclamation, “I can’t live without her;╯.╯.╯. Even the sound of her footsteps is beautiful.╯.╯.╯. My enchantress—my dream!” (Act 1) is emblematic of the intensity with which the characters devote themselves to a gloriously idealized notion of love. This passion generates anguish, as well, particularly for those who feel that such love is beyond their reach. The schoolmaster Medvedenko laments to Masha, “I love you, I’m so miserable I can’t stay at home, every day I walk six versts here and six versts back, but I get nothing but indifference from
The Seagullâ•…â•… 277 you,” to which she replies, “Nonsense .╯.╯. Your love touches me, but I can’t return it, that’s all” (Act 1). By the end of the act, Masha reveals the cause of her inability to return Medvedenko’s affection: She is in love with Treplev. As she pours out her confession to the country doctor, Dorn, he tries to comfort her, marveling at the intensity of the younger generation’s emotions, saying, “How nervous you all are! How nervous! And so much love! Oh, that bewitching lake!” (Act 1)—linking the romantic fervor with the environment. Passions flare, and the comic tone begins to wane as the summer progresses over acts 2 and 3 as Treplev’s and Nina’s mutual affection is disrupted by the presence of Trigorin, a well-known writer and the lover of Treplev’s mother, Arkadina. Though physical violence is kept offstage, the results are shown, and emotional violence plays out in the language through which the characters express their disenchantment with love. Disconsolate over the loss of Nina’s affection and jealous of her burgeoning affair with Trigorin, Treplev shoots a seagull and lays it at Nina’s feet, announcing, “Soon, in the same way, I shall kill myself.” Displaying a similarly impassioned fury over her unfulfilled desires, Masha tells Trigorin, “I’ve made up my mind to tear this love out of my heart—tear it out by the roots,” and she reveals that she intends to marry Medvedenko so that “new cares will stifle the old,” an impractical solution that seems doomed to failure. In act 4, set in the autumn two years later, an emotional chill has set in, reinforced by the howling winds that rattle the estate. Stuck in the same patterns they were in at the beginning of the play, the characters seem emotionally stagnant. Married to Medvedenko, Masha has found no distraction from her desires, yet she clings to the belief that she will be able to “forget it all” if her husband is transferred to another district, enabling her to tear her love for Treplev out of her heart “by the roots.” Medvedenko is still walking six versts (approximately four miles) to and from the estate to spend time with his beloved, though Masha’s indifference has turned to bitterness. Similarly, Treplev, though he has not seen Nina for two years, cannot let go of his love for her. When she returns to the estate unannounced, he says, “Nina, I cursed you, I hated you .╯.╯. but every
minute I was conscious that my soul was bound to yours forever. I can never stop loving you.” Yet there is no comfort in his declaration for either of them, as Nina still loves Trigorin “passionately, desperately,” despite being abandoned by him after a tumultuous affair. In the end, the characters’ inability to express their love in realistic terms has devastating consequences. The pursuit of how life is “in dreams” provides an escape from the mundane realities of life, but the characters’ commitment to a romanticized ideal results in discontent, and love becomes a burden rather than a source of happiness. Margaret Savilonis
Work in The Seagull
As in many of Anton Chekhov’s plays, questions about the value of work frame the experience of the characters in The Seagull. On the one hand, work provides direction and structure, as well as the means necessary to survive by earning an income, however small. Yet although they are compelled to work, few of the characters find pleasure in their occupations, as the desire to find deeper meaning in life is hindered by the commitment work demands of their minds, bodies, and souls. As a result of the dissatisfaction engendered by a life of labor that offers no opportunity for “living,” the creative work of artists becomes romanticized as a path to enlightenment. This privileging of the role of the artist is summed up by Doctor Dorn’s observation, “If society loves artists and treats them differently from .╯.╯. merchants, let us say, that is in the nature of things. That’s—idealism” (Act 1). Yet the experiences of the writers Trigorin and Treplev and the actress Nina show the cracks in that ideal, as even creative work imposes burdens. Most of the characters in the play are disheartened by the lack of financial and emotional reward they get from their occupations. Though Masha asserts that “even a beggar can be happy,” the schoolmaster Medvedenko argues that his job, which pays only 23 rubles a month, makes it difficult for him “to make ends meet” as he tries to support himself, his mother, and his three siblings. Sorin, the retired owner of the country estate on which the play’s action takes place, laments, “I served in the Depart-
278â•…â•… Chesnutt, Charles W. ment of Justice for twenty-eight years, but I’ve never lived, never experienced anything.” Even Dorn, a successful doctor, is dissatisfied with the ways in which work has consumed his life, as he tells Medvedenko, “After thirty years of practice, an onerous practice .╯.╯. when day and night I couldn’t call my soul my own, I managed to save only two thousand rubles” (Act 3). Devoting their lives to their jobs has afforded them little financial security and limited time to pursue other interests. Thus, the work of the artist, and its attendant fame and fortune, seems enviable. Sorin notes that all his life he longed to become a writer, believing it “must be pleasant”; Nina professes that she would give up everything for the “happiness of being a writer or an actress.” Furthermore, creative work is venerated because it offers spiritual liberation that ordinary jobs do not. Dorn tells the aspiring writer Treplev, “[I]f it had ever been my lot to experience the exaltation that comes to artists in their moments of creation, I believe I should have despised this material shell of mine and all that pertains to it, and I’d have soared to the heights, leaving all earthly things behind me” (Act 2). Even for artists, however, work proves to be a distraction from living. Fawning over the writer Trigorin, Nina declares, “How I envy you!╯.╯.╯. Some can barely drag out their dull, obscure existences, all very much alike, and all miserable, while others, like you .╯.╯. are given a life that is brilliant, interesting, full of meaning” (Act 3). Trigorin’s response—“Oh what a preposterous life! Here I am talking to you, I’m excited, yet not for a moment do I forget that my unfinished novel is waiting for me.╯.╯.╯. I have no rest from myself, and I feel that I am consuming my own life”—challenges this idealization of the artist’s life. Similarly, Treplev, a published writer by the end of the play, struggles with his calling and finds the creative process “agonizing,” suggesting that creative labor is not as glamorous as it seems; it is, in the end, still work. By the end of the play, Nina is no longer enchanted by romantic notions about the artist’s work, having “been drawn into the whirlpool” and finding that the demands of her career as an actress, traveling third class on a train to work in the provinces, make for a “coarse life.” Nevertheless, she has found value in
the sacrifices she makes. For her, fame is no longer important; rather, she finds strength in committing herself to her work, noting, “[W]hen I think of my vocation, I’m not afraid of life” (Act 4). Nina has come to recognize that meaning is not something one merely finds, but something one produces, and work is a fundamental component of that process. Margaret Savilonis
CHESNUTT, CHARLES W.â•… “The Goophered Grapevine”â•… (1887)
Charles W. Chesnutt (1858–1932) published the short story “The Goophered Grapevine,” in the Atlantic Monthly in 1887. It was the first of many stories about the nature of slavery as reflected in the stories eventually collected into The Conjure Woman (1899). His protagonist, Uncle Julius, is a very cagy former slave still living on the plantation to which he had belonged. Chesnutt’s careful and brilliant characterizations illustrate the dignity of the former slaves and the ignorance of the slave owners and carpetbaggers. Uncle Julius tells largely fictitious stories about supernatural goings-on in his world. Chesnutt’s stories are humorous and full of dialect, local folklore, and colorful characters. In the story, a northerner relocates to North Carolina and shortly thereafter visits a plantation. There, he learns that the grapevines on the plantation have been “goophered,” or bewitched. The teller of this tale, a former slave named Uncle Julius, is actually trying to scare off the northerner, a potential buyer of the plantation, with his supernatural story. The Uncle Julius stories were well received as they appeared. Chesnutt was successful so long as he wrote to this formula. He wrote several novels that moved beyond local color and humor, but topics such as miscegenation and mixed races were unpopular. Due to poor sales, Chesnutt was unable to make a living from his writing. He finally abandoned his writing career but remained a tireless activist for interracial understanding. Elizabeth Malia
Ethics in “The Goophered Grapevine”
There are at least three variations in ethics displayed in “The Goophered Grapevine,” none of which
“The Goophered Grapevine”â•…â•… 279 would be recognized by Socrates, the great ancient Greek philosopher of ethics. The story as told by Uncle Julius illustrates clearly the conundrum that was slavery in the antebellum South and the confusion between the races after the Civil War. Certainly slavery was an ethical quagmire in American history, and these characters reflect that. The narrator, a vintner from Ohio, comes across Uncle Julius, a former slave, still living on the old McAdoo plantation. His first reaction is that the former slave is not fully negro but has some white blood; his hair “suggested a slight strain of other than negro blood.” Based on his preconceptions, the narrator also believes that Uncle Julius is not very bright, but he learns differently through experience: There was “shrewdness in his character.” The northerner is condescending, and he is aware that Uncle Julius’s tale is suspicious. “I have not noticed any developments of the goopher in the vineyard,” he says, but he knows the locals are eating the grapes. He listens to Julius’s wild tale of cursed grapevines patiently but is not fooled by it. The narrator buys the vineyard and makes a success of it. He resolves his one twitch of conscience by reporting that he hired Uncle Julius and paid him as much as he could have made from illegally selling the scuppernong grapes. It seems as if the northerner is proud of his magnanimity. He says that the wages paid to Julius for his services as coachman “were more than equivalent for anything he lost by the sale of the vineyard.” He never considers Uncle Julius an equal. The story of Ole Mars Dugal McAdoo as told by Uncle Julius reveals how slaves looked at and humored their masters. McAdoo’s motivation was twofold: to profit from the grapes and his slaves and to control through fear. First, he told his slaves not to eat the grapes because it would cut into his profits. When that did not work, he bought a curse from a “conjure woman.” “Dey wuz a cunjuh ’oman .╯.╯. [who] could wuk the mos’ powerfulles’ kin’ er goopher” to place upon his grapevines—if a slave ate a grape he would die. And so they stopped eating the grapes out of fear. When a new slave such as Henry unknowingly ate a grape, the conjure woman provided a temporary solution to Henry’s dilemma that ebbed and flowed with the growing season. McAdoo turned this to his advantage. When the spring sap
rose, Henry’s strength greatly increased, so each year he was sold to another plantation. As the growing season waned, Henry’s strength and value declined, and McAdoo took him back. He made a good profit on Henry every year. McAdoo was greedy and never took into account what this might do to Henry or his family. He destroyed lives without a thought, secure in his legal rights of ownership. Uncle Julius has crafted a comfortable existence on the plantation since Ole Mars Dugal McAdoo left. He sells the scuppernong grapes, lives where he chooses, and comes and goes without a “by-yourleave.” He has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. He is unimpressed with both his former owner and the vineyard’s new owner. His way of life is firmly built on the practice of lying to the master. It is Julius’s way of avoiding punishment, banishment, and hard work. Julius’s dependence on dialect, which gets thicker as his story proceeds, is part of that lie: He hopes to disguise his native intelligence. So if the northerner condescends to him, Uncle Julius returns the favor by thinking the northerner will believe in the curse and the story he tells. Julius is not above stealing, either. Are these men unethical? By their own lights, they are not. Ethics do not exist out of context but, rather, are the underpinning of social structure. They are rules or standards of how people live harmoniously in society together. Julius feels lying is ethical for slaves who have no other advantage, while McAdoo saw no reason to exercise ethics on his slaves. Chesnutt’s interest was in better interracial relations, and he believed that could be accomplished through knowledge and experience. Uncle Julius represents his earliest vehicle toward that goal. The story of the northerner, McAdoo the slave owner, and the former slave is not about violence or evil but about human nature under very specific circumstances. While humanity can strive for ideals, the realities are more often than not determined by context. Slavery is gone, lamented or not, but its ripples through human nature take time to dissipate. Elizabeth Malia
Freedom in “The Goophered Grapevine”
What does freedom mean to an American? Charles W. Chesnutt indirectly comes to the conclusion that
280â•…â•… Chesnutt, Charles W. there is a “color line” that separates the meaning of freedom to Uncle Julius, a former slave, and to his soon-to-be new employer, the northern gentleman who has come to look at the McAdoo grapevine and plantation. The modern, colloquial meaning of freedom 100 years after “The Goophered Grapevine” means that Americans have the right to determine their own path, to make their own choices, to move at will without a by-your-leave. For Uncle Julius, freedom is a complex term. He knows that he has the ability to come and go as he pleases, but he has not chosen to leave the land where he was born. He knows that he does not have the economic resources to do so, and as long as the vineyard grapes are unclaimed and abandoned without an owner, he is free to pick all he wants and even sell them to his neighbors: “Uncle Julius had occupied a cabin on the place for many years and derived a respectable revenue from the product of the neglected vines.” But Julius knows he does not have the freedom to create a commercial business out of the grapes. Once a buyer for the land appears, Uncle Julius does not even have the freedom to eat the grapes with enjoyment and abandon: “He went on eating the grapes, but did not seem to enjoy himself quite so well.” The former slave can choose his own path, but to maintain the status quo he must manipulate circumstances while at the same time covering himself in the role of the “good darky” in order to survive. For the northerner looking at the property, his freedoms are many, and he focuses to some extent on the commercial ones that are possible in the purchase of the vineyard. He can use his resources to improve the land: “Labor was cheap and land could be bought for a mere song.” He will live a comfortable and congenial life: He merely takes what he sees around him and uses it to his own ends. He is not worried about survival but, rather, about acquiring cash and the comforts it provides. The blacks who will work for him are not real people but instead are two-dimensional “children” who still need the white man’s direction and guidance. The main action of this story takes place in a flashback, related by Uncle Julius, which is heavy with dialect and overt statements of the stupidity of his own race as well as that of his late master,
Marse McAdoo. McAdoo begrudged the grapes his slaves ate and resorted to a curse from the “cunjuh ’oman [conjure woman].” This woman reputedly could “wuk de mos’ powerfulles’ kin’ er goopher,” and McAdoo paid her $10 to curse any slave that ate the grapes. Inevitably, a valuable slave partook of the grapes and became ill, but McAdoo had the “cunjuh ’oman” create an exception to the curse and save the slave. This eventually led to a fraud being worked by McAdoo using the slave, whose strength waxed and waned because of the altered curse. The white narrator expresses some skepticism at the end of the story. Uncle Julius’s efforts to fool him have failed, and he buys the vineyard. Rather offhandedly, he remarks that “it has been for a long time in a thriving condition.” Chesnutt’s brilliance here is that the context of freedom is completely sub rosa. Neither Uncle Julius nor the northerner ever speaks of the concept of freedom or of advantages or disadvantages. They never mention the color line between them. It is only because the northerner is the narrator that we get small flashes of indulgence and smugness on his part to imply the color line exists. And it is only his condescending observations of Uncle Julius that provide even the smallest acknowledgement that the former slave walks that line every day of his life. Uncle Julius has carved out a comfortable life after slavery and does not want anyone to disturb it, but he is also well aware that the northerner looking at the vineyard as an investment can and will do that very thing. Still, he tries through his story to change the obvious outcome. The fact that Uncle Julius accepts defeat on this point is evidence how far his freedom to have the life he wants is compromised. It also shows that Uncle Julius has learned that a stereotypical facade is his best option to effect his options. He will lose points, but perhaps not the game. Elizabeth Malia
Race in “The Goophered Grapevine”
“The Goophered Grapevine,” by Charles W. Chesnutt, is all about race, or, perhaps more accurately, about races. Chesnutt portrays the foibles of the 19th-century white population in relation to the African-American population. He is adept at taking
The Awakeningâ•…â•… 281 the post–Civil War stereotype of the freed slave and turning it on its ear. The happy-go-lucky, childlike blacks portrayed in other period novels are here shown to be wily and manipulative. Meanwhile, the victorious yet greedy whites from the North are shown to be comfortable with the stereotype and to some degree disingenuous about social conditions in the region. Uncle Julius is a freed slave who has chosen not to leave the South. He does not necessarily like whites, and he surely does not trust them. He uses the stereotypical “Yas, suh” and “Lawd bless you, suh” to cover up a natural shrewdness. The white narrator decides that shrewdness is “not altogether African,” thus preserving in his own mind the stereotype of the blacks in general. But Uncle Julius is shrewd and attempts to manipulate the white man by launching into a story about a cursed—or, as he calls it, “goophered”—grapevine. A story within the story explains the curse, which was initiated in antebellum times. McAdoo, the previous owner of the grapevine, did not like his slaves to eat his grapes, so he cursed the grapevine in such a way that if a slave ate of that vine, he would dwindle away and die. Of course, the grapes would not impact the whites in any way. A prize slave, Henry, ate of the vine anyway and started to decline, so McAdoo sought out the conjure woman who made the curse and found a way to save the ill slave, at least temporarily. Uncle Julius makes clear his dislike for McAdoo and whites in general by telling the narrator how Henry would be sold for a high price in the early spring when he was in the best of condition. In the fall, as Henry’s stamina and vigor collapsed, McAdoo would buy him back for a song. This continued for several years until the vine and Henry both died. Chesnutt describes the white narrator in economic terms. He is a man looking to bring intelligence, attention, and money to the South in order to develop it and make more money. He knows grape culture, and so he looks at the grapevine in question. He sees the African Americans in the area as potential workers, sources of entertainment, and background. They are of no real importance to him and therefore no competition. “I was enough of a pioneer to start a new industry,” he says of his
search for a vineyard. Further, he says that “labor was cheap and land could be bought for a mere song.” The northerner is indulgent of Uncle Julius’s story and clearly humors the former slave with his questions. He does not believe the tale of the goophered grapevine. At the end of Uncle Julius’s story, he reiterates his advice to the northerner not to buy the land. The motivation behind the story and the recommendation is not hard to determine. Uncle Julius sees the coming of the northerners as another influx of those who would seek to exploit the land and the local population, especially the blacks. He knows he cannot truly fight such a situation, but he tries within his means. The northerner assigns Uncle Julius an economic motive because he makes a small income from other blacks by harvesting what grapes survive. The narrator only sees the potential profits and not the costs. He is quite proud to say that he later hired the former slave as a coachman. He soothes whatever conscience he might have by deciding that Julius’s wage is the equivalent of his takings from the grapevine. Thus, the northerner does away with Julius’s ability to take care of himself through his own efforts and ingenuity, trapping him with mere wages that allow for no advancement. The conflict of the races in “The Goophered Grapevine” is one of superiority and hypocrisy. A white person can be progressive and succeed only by severing the ability of a black person to do the same. The whites like the status quo, which includes the blacks in the role of servants with a docile, grateful, and trusting manner. The black man can only use subterfuge to try to survive that condescension and economic exploitation. Elizabeth Malia
CHOPIN, KATEâ•… The Awakeningâ•… (1899)
Very simply put, The Awakening is the story of a housewife who grows dissatisfied with her life and commits suicide. But The Awakening is a complex narrative, and that simple summary does not begin to do justice to these complexities. In order to really understand the novel, one must understand something about the culture that
282â•…â•… Chopin, Kate produced it. The laws in Louisiana at the time and the role of women in Creole society are important to understanding the character of Edna Pontellier. Kate Chopin (1850–1904), the author of The Awakening, was extremely interested in the role of women and critical of the institution of marriage in American society at the turn of the 20th century. Almost all of Chopin’s fiction deals with these issues, and The Awakening is no exception. The novel explores the deepest psychology of a woman as she begins to understand that her marriage is not satisfying her. Chopin’s novel is also extremely literary. Her use of language to express her character’s psychological development is rich and nuanced, and her narrative experiments with unconventional points of view. Audience reception of The Awakening was not altogether positive. The idea of a married woman taking lovers was too much for the American audience of the time, and the book was taken out of circulation. It was rediscovered decades later at a time when audiences were better prepared to study and appreciate the novel’s richness. Kathryn Kleypas
Coming of Age in The Awakening
The core of The Awakening by Kate Chopin is the coming of age of its protagonist, Edna Pontellier, making it a key text in the genre of coming-of-age novel’s. While Edna is technically an adult at the beginning of the novel, the action centers on her development into a more psychologically mature individual. The Awakening deals heavily with issues of women in society. Kate Chopin is also very interested in the role of marriage, and we can see throughout The Awakening the interesting ways that she explores this and other issues through Edna’s coming-of-age process. Chopin seems to have very strong opinions about the role of women in society and we can read Edna’s story as a strong criticism about the ways that women were supposed to behave at the time the novel was written. When we first meet Edna, she is spending her summer holiday away from the city (New Orleans), surrounded by what the narrator calls “mother women.” These women, such as her friend Madame Ratignolle, care very deeply for their children and
focus on doing things that are socially acceptable for women to be doing. Edna is always a little confused when she is around such women. She sees that her own behavior is different from the behavior of the “mother women,” but she does not completely understand why. Edna’s husband is also critical of how she treats their children, believing she is too detached from them. During Edna’s summer holiday, she cultivates a friendship with a man for whom she begins to have romantic feelings, but he leaves for a job in Mexico and she returns to New Orleans to resume her normal life. It is as she resumes her normal daily life back home that we begin to see Edna having minor epiphanies—a common experience in coming-ofage narratives. In many works by Chopin, her characters frequently experience epiphanies, and the very title of this novel, The Awakening, suggests that Edna’s epiphany is central to the story. Edna begins to understand, at first only very simply and then later in more complex ways, that she is unhappy in her marriage. She does not dislike her husband personally, but she resists the expectations that society has placed on her in her role as a woman, wife, and mother. As Edna has more minor epiphanies, she begins to explore ways that she can resist society’s expectations of her. The first thing she does is to spend more time with Mademoiselle Reisz, a woman who fully resists society’s expectations of womanly behavior. She is intelligent, sticks to her own opinions, lives alone in a small apartment, is unmarried, supports herself, and is not particularly pleasant in her behavior to others. It is very common in women’s coming-of-age novels to have the main character learn from another woman who is more evolved. Edna finally moves out of her husband’s house and takes control of her own finances, supporting herself with a small inheritance and her work as an artist. Even though the house she moves into is extremely small compared to the home her husband had provided, she pays all of its expenses herself. She allows her children to be cared for by their grandmother, and she experiences a brief time completely free of the marital and maternal restrictions she had known. She takes a lover, which completes her “awakening.”
The Awakeningâ•…â•… 283 The ending of The Awakening is a very famous and contested passage in which Edna kills herself by swimming out into the sea. It seems Edna’s epiphany came a century too soon: While she had a personal “awakening,” it was of no practical use to her in her time. Though she was aware that she did not want to live within the confines that society placed on her, society did not change along with her, and her awakening to this fact made it impossible for her to continue to live at all. Kathryn Kleypas
Isolation in The Awakening
Kate Chopin’s The Awakening deals intimately with the theme of isolation. The working title of the novel used by the author before changing it to The Awakening was A Solitary Soul. The primary theme of “awakening,” or coming of age, comes into play when Edna Pontellier, the main character, feels alienated from other people. It is precisely when Edna feels the most isolated from those around her that she begins to experience the deep moments of growth that lead to her “awakening.” From the novel’s first pages, Edna is described as feeling detached from Creole society and perplexed by the behavior of the Creoles with whom she associates. She therefore chooses to be alone rather than try to accommodate her own behavior to their expectations. In several extended passages, the theme of isolation is developed. While Edna splashes in the Gulf waters during the last days of summer at Grand Isle, she ponders her life. The narrator tells us that Edna is going to be the recipient of more wisdom than most people experience in their lives. We then see Edna floating on the ocean’s seductive waves, her soul being invited to “abysses of solitude.” Once again, isolation and solitude are linked to moments of growth, development, and wisdom for Edna. A few pages later, she again chooses to be alone in the ocean. Her alienation is associated with power: She swims out by herself, away from the group of bathers, so that she can experience the intoxicating feeling of being able to swim alone. Here solitude is linked with growth, power, and choice for Edna. These early passages in the novel link Edna’s isolation with the beginnings of dissatisfaction with
her life. In later passages, she chooses much longer periods of withdrawal from her family and friends. Upon her return from summer vacation on the Gulf, she resumes her normal life at her home in New Orleans but also begins to detach herself from her normal circle of friends when she stops receiving visitors in her home. As the novel progresses, Edna’s periods of selfisolation become linked to depression. At one point, she describes the whole “alien world” as antagonistic, and she starts to isolate herself in a much more determined manner. Her husband is so worried by her behavior that he consults the family doctor, who advises him to let her continue in her self-inflicted solitude. Finally, when her husband leaves for an extended business trip to New York and she allows her sons to be taken by their grandmother, Edna begins to view her isolation as a positive thing. She revels in the quiet afforded her in the absence of her family. She goes from room to room, experiencing her home in new ways now that she is not trying to accommodate her behavior to anyone else’s expectations. It is after this experience of living alone that Edna’s real “awakening” begins. The act of retreating from everyone around her has opened a space for her to experience her own development and growth. Away from the limitations imposed on her by Creole society and by her husband, family, father, and intimate friends, she is able to explore alternative ways to live her life and to make her own choices. While Edna’s important moments of growth happen in moments of self-inflicted isolation, and these moments are often positive for her, ultimately she cannot shake off a more negative sense of loneliness. She loves other men but ultimately finds no lasting satisfaction in these affairs. In the end, the narrator describes a sense of isolation for Edna that is similar to that vague feeling signaled at the beginning of the novel. Back at Grand Isle for another summer holiday, Edna swims out into the Gulf waters while thinking about her life. She realizes that there is no human being that she wants near her except her lover and that one day she will no longer desire him. In a voice reminiscent of that of the novel’s opening passages, Edna enters the sea, which
284â•…â•… Cisneros, Sandra invites her soul to “wander in abysses of solitude.” She enters the ocean naked and “absolutely alone.” Kathryn Kleypas
Sex and Sexuality in The Awakening
The Awakening by Kate Chopin deals so explicitly with the theme of sexuality and eroticism that it was taken out of circulation soon after its publication. The themes of isolation and coming of age are integral to this novel as well, but without a discussion of her awakening sense of herself as a sexual person, no study of the character of Edna Pontellier would be complete. Indeed, the theme of awakening sexuality is at the very heart of the novel and of Edna’s coming of age. The novel describes Edna’s marriage to Leonce Pontellier in ways that make us see it as predictable and rather dull. Like most of the husbands in Chopin’s fiction, Leonce Pontellier is kind and loving but also somewhat controlling. What becomes difficult for Edna, although it takes her much of the novel to discover it, is that the marriage does not fulfill her. She is dutiful and does what she needs to do to be in keeping with the societal expectations of her time. However, living within the confines of marriage makes her feel bored and alienated from her society. In this way, Chopin can be seen to be making judgments, not against Edna’s sexual behavior but against the institution of marriage. In the process of vacationing during her first summer at Grand Isle, Edna comes into daily contact with Robert, a Creole man who performs the role of her suitor more out boredom than for any other reason. Edna is not aware enough of Creole traditions and mistakes the man’s attentions for something more serious. This relationship sparks the beginning of an epiphany, or “awakening”—an awakening to a sexuality that she never before realized she had. Edna’s growing awareness of her own sexuality is shown to the reader through several extended passages. Very soon after leaving Grand Isle and returning to her New Orleans life, Edna visits the pianist Mademoiselle Reisz, who allows her to read letters from Robert while she plays for her on the piano. While listening to the piano music and read-
ing Robert’s letters about her, Edna experiences an erotic sensuality. As time goes on, though, it seems as if Robert himself becomes less important to Edna than her own increasing interest in understanding and experiencing her sensual and sexual nature. In the absence of Robert and then her own family, and in a growing sense of isolation from her society, Edna begins to spend time with Alcée Arobin, a local playboy. Her interactions with him, which appeal to her new feelings of sensuality, come at a time when Edna is obviously primed for this sort of sexual experience. The passages of the novel that describe her feelings surrounding her encounters with Alcée are some of the most sexually charged in the novel. Because of the way the novel is narrated, the main character’s experiences are filtered through those of the narrator, and judgment is therefore suspended. There are no moral judgments made on Edna’s behavior. A married woman taking a lover was unacceptable behavior to most of Chopin’s reading audience of the time, and many of her readers were looking for the author to make moral judgment on Edna’s behavior, which might have made the book acceptable to them. Lacking that moral judgment, however, audiences and critics attacked what they took to be Chopin’s assault on propriety and the chastity of southern women. Edna’s death at the end of the novel was taken in the context of a sort of cautionary tale, meaning that it was seen as a punishment for her sinful and unbecoming behavior. Contemporary critics read the ending of the novel as an inevitability of a different sort: Edna must die because her awakening came too soon. Today, many see Edna as behaving appropriately, and her death is viewed as a tragedy in that her higher level of consciousness came at a time when her society was unable to accommodate her “awakening.” Kathryn L. Kleypas
CISNEROS, SANDRAâ•… The House on Mango Streetâ•… (1983)
Since The House on Mango Street was published in 1983, it has become a standard in literature classes across the country. This is the story of Esperanza
The House on Mango Streetâ•…â•… 285 Cordero through her own eyes as she comes to maturity in the slums of Chicago. She is the daughter of a Hispanic family during the 1960s and struggles to find her own identity and place in the world. Sandra Cisneros (b. 1954) uses a vignette style to illustrate themes and to highlight Esperanza’s journey through childhood. The vignettes are made up of conversations and poetry and are evocative of the author’s memories of a similar childhood. Cisneros shows the growing mind of a child as she struggles between the world of a traditional Hispanic family and that of popular culture. Esperanza learns early that the differences between men and women are profound and will never be completely understood, but she also determines that the traditional role of a Hispanic woman is of no interest to her. She wants to write, and the encouragement she receives makes all the difference as she steps away from the role models of her family and friends. While there are autobiographical elements to this story, Esperanza is also a complete person in her own right. She inspires readers to see beyond the walls and expectations of their culture, their family, and the assumptions of society to a level of self-realization seldom achieved. Elizabeth Malia
T he American Dream in The House on Mango Street
The 20th-century American dream features particular elements, the most important being the ability to own a home and acquire whatever material goods you desire. In The House on Mango Street, Sandra Cisneros grants that wish to the young protagonist, Esperanza. Somehow (it is never explained now) her father has managed to make and save enough money to finance the purchase of a home for his family. Moving to a house is a big change for the family because they are moving away from a totally Hispanic neighborhood to one that is undergoing a cultural shift. Esperanza is just a small girl when the move begins. She has a dream of a particular house, with a very one-dimensional look to it: “Our house would be white with trees around it, a great big yard, and grass growing without a fence.” Faced with economic reality and probable prejudice on the part of realtors,
the family hurriedly moves into the house on Mango Street, which was “[n]ot the house we’d thought we’d get.” Esperanza had hoped to have a room to herself, but “[e]verybody has to share a room.” Having a house, even on Mango Street, is not the American dream for Esperanza, but it is the beginning of her own struggle to define what such a dream might become and who she might be in that place. The neighborhood surrounding the house on Mango Street serves as an extension for Esperanza. She has no yard to play in, so she must play on the sidewalks and street with the neighborhood kids. She hopes for her own “best friend” and right off meets Cathy, the “queen of cats.” Cathy can be her best friend, “but only until next Tuesday.” For Cathy and her family, presumably white, are moving because “the neighborhood is getting bad.” Esperanza knows that it is because “people like us keep moving in.” The little girl who did not like the house to begin with is now the girl all too aware that the house is ugly. Now she also knows that there is something about her family owning a house that is bad. As Esperanza matures, her desire for a different house is still strong. She even goes to see a fortune teller, Elenita, to determine whether that part of the dream will come true, saying, “What about a house .╯.╯. because that’s what I came for.” Elenita says, “Ah, yes, a home in the heart. I see a home in the heart.” This is a true prediction, but Esperanza is still too young to grasp its wisdom. Sally is one of Esperanza’s neighborhood friends. Unlike the more naive Esperanza, Sally sits at home all day, married before eighth grade to get away from her mama. Esperanza is envious, thinking, “She has her husband and her house now, her pillowcases and her plates.” Esperanza doubts that Sally is any happier than Rafaela, though, because Sally’s husband “won’t let her talk on the telephone. And he doesn’t let her look out the window. And he doesn’t like her friends, so nobody gets to visit unless he is working.” Esperanza learns from this situation that Sally has traded her freedom for things, including a house. Esperanza will not sit at home, afraid to go outside. She is learning that the American dream must be different for her. She still wants a house, but does
286â•…â•… Cisneros, Sandra she want to be trapped into motherhood in order to have one? Does she want to be afraid of her own shadow? She knows she does not want the Mango Street that she grew up on, but she cannot discard who and what it has made of her. The house she wants is clear and detailed in her mind. Not a flat. Not an apartment in back. Not a man’s house. Not a daddy’s. A house all my own. With my porch and my pillow, my pretty purple petunias. My books and my stories. My two shoes waiting beside the bed. Nobody to shake a stick at. Nobody’s garbage to pick up after. Only a house quiet as snow, a space for myself to go, clean as paper before the poem. Esperanza wants a house of her own, a place of serenity and order, one that will be for her a “home in the heart.” She wants only a small part of the American dream, and then only as a support for her freedom. Elizabeth Malia
Identity in The House on Mango Street
All children form their characters within the world of family and social concepts. Esperanza is a young girl growing first into a teenager and then a woman having to cope with more than the usual problems. She is a poor Hispanic child who lives in the slums of Chicago amid several cultures mixing together. She wants to know who she is and who she will become. Sandra Cisneros’s vignette format allows the reader to travel through Esperanza’s developing life and personality as she finds her identity. As a girl, Esperanza learns that there are cultural expectations, religious expectations, peer expectations, and a paradigm shift from a traditional female role to a new concept of women as equals. She is Hispanic, but not all of her neighbors are. She is poor but not bad. She also decides to seek personal freedom when most of her contemporaries make choices that limit their freedom and maintain the status quo, and she explores her own sexuality. “Those who do not know any better come into our neighborhood scared,” Esperanza says as she first articulates her experiences of racism. She con-
tinues, “All brown, all around, we are safe. But watch us drive into a neighborhood of another color and our knees go shakity-shake and our car windows get rolled up tight.” Familiar as the Hispanic neighborhood is, Esperanza knows that courtship rituals are not always happy. She wonders if her namesake great-grandmother ever forgave her great-grandfather for essentially kidnapping her. She thinks, “My great-grandfather threw a sack over her head and carried her off. Just like that, as if she were a fancy chandelier. That’s the way he did it.” She envisions her great-grandmother looking “out the window her whole life, the way so many women sit their sadness on an elbow.” Esperanza vows this will not be her own fate. Seeing this through Esperanza’s eyes is the secret to this novel, as she is aware that she does not want to fit any mold. The most prominent issue Esperanza faces has to do with sex and sexuality. At first she has little sense of such things. Marin, her older friend, wears short skirts and spends the evenings leaning on the fence waiting for boys to walk by: “What matters, Marin says, is for the boys to see us and for us to see them.” Esperanza begins to understand that boys are not all noisy little brothers, and she knows that she is drawing boys’ attention, thinking, “I don’t remember when I first noticed him looking at me—Sire. But I knew he was looking.” She is intrigued but also frightened, and her family disapproves. “He is a punk,” says her father. Esperanza feels that “Everything is holding its breath inside me. Everything is waiting to explode like Christmas. I want to be all new and shiny.” As she matures, Esperanza begins to recognize that her fate is all but predestined. Aunt Lupe, crippled by probable polio, has told her, “You just remember to keep writing, Esperanza. You must keep writing. It will keep you free.” A few years later, she decides to begin “my own quiet war,” meaning that she “will not grow up tame like the others who lay their necks on the threshold waiting for the ball and chain.” She wants no children, no husband, and no ties that will keep her down. She wants to escape the tragedy of her great-grandmother and her own mother, who waxes nostalgic for her own youth—“I could’ve been somebody, you know?”—but she quit
The House on Mango Streetâ•…â•… 287 school “[b]ecause I didn’t have nice clothes.” Finally, Esperanza is aware that she does not wish to be trapped like her friend Sally, whose much-older husband is okay, “Except he won’t let her talk on the telephone. And he doesn’t like her to look out the window. And he doesn’t like her friends, so nobody gets to visit her unless he’s working.” Sally sits at home because she “is afraid to go outside without his permission.” Cisneros makes a simple statement in the last vignette that sums up the entire story of Esperanza on Mango Street. Esperanza is planning to leave home, planning to have a house of her own, and planning to write. She says, “I like to tell stories. I am going to tell you a story about a girl who didn’t want to belong.” Esperanza wants to create her own life, her own world, and she breaks free of Mango Street. She is Hispanic, but not just Hispanic; she is a woman, but not just a woman. Elizabeth Malia
Innocence and Experience in The House on Mango Street
Sandra Cisneros writes powerfully of a young girl’s coming of age in the modern era in her debut work, The House on Mango Street. She eschews any romantic or flowery prose as she tells the story of Esperanza Cordero, a young Hispanic girl who moves to Mango Street, grows up there, loses her innocence, and finds herself. Esperanza’s family is intact and whole, and they are living in their own house in an inner-city neighborhood evolving from lower middle class to almost poverty ridden. As a small girl, she is protected and safe, naive and trusting. Esperanza displays her innocence when describing her mama’s hair as “sweet when you put your nose into when she is holding you, holding you and you feel safe.” Despite this feeling of safety, she is aware that not everyone wants Hispanics in the neighborhood. Her friend Cathy tells her they are friends only “until next Tuesday,” and then Cathy’s family will be moving because of families like Esperanza’s arriving. Later, Esperanza will describe how outsiders show fear when entering the neighborhood in their cars. She says, “Those who don’t know any better come into our neighborhood scared. They
think we’re dangerous.” The residents feel safe in a nearly homogenous area: “All brown all around, we are safe.” Already Esperanza’s innocence has been damaged by prejudice and ignorance. Playing dress-up with her friends, Esperanza learns that actions can be misinterpreted. Walking to the store in her mother’s high heels, she is told those shoes are “dangerous,” which she disregards in her naïveté. They come across a derelict they christen “Mr. Bum.” He tries to convince Rachel to give him a kiss and promises her a dollar. Frightened, the girls run away; they do not know what the danger is, but they feel it. At home, safe, they decide they are “tired of being beautiful,” and the shoes are forsaken. The natural urge to grow up too fast is dealt a blow, but it is not permanent. When Esperanza begins to develop physically and discovers she has hips, Lucy says that besides holding babies while cooking, hips are needed “to dance. If you don’t get them you may turn into a man.” Esperanza, already enlightened by Alicia, adds, “It’s the bones that let you know which skeleton was a man’s when it was a man and which a woman’s.” And, “One day you might decide to have kids, and then where are you going to put them? Got to have room. Bones got to give.” On her first job, Esperanza is accosted by an Asian man she hardly knows. “He grabs my face with both hands and kisses me hard on the mouth and doesn’t let go.” She is bothered by this, but does not understand it. In the neighborhood and at school, she realizes that a certain boy is looking at her, all the time. Ironically, his name is Sire. She is frightened but also excited. She feels, “Everything is holding its breath inside me. Everything is waiting to explode like Christmas. I want to be all new and shiny. I want to sit out bad at night, a boy around my neck.” She is envious of the bad girls, “the ones that go into alleys,” like Sire’s girlfriend. Esperanza wants “to love and to love and to love and to love, and no one could call that crazy.” Sally shows Esperanza how boys treat her. She lets the boys tease her and steal her keys. Sally has to kiss them to get the keys back, but she does not seem to mind. “It was just a kiss, that’s all. A kiss for each one. So what, she said.” Eventually, the kisses lead to further sexual exploitations.
288â•…â•… Cisneros, Sandra Hanging around with boys proves very painful for Esperanza, and she blames Sally, saying “Sally, you lied. It wasn’t what you said at all. What he did. Where he touched me. I didn’t want it, Sally. The way they said it, the way it’s supposed to be, all the storybooks and movies, why did you lie to me?” A forced initiation into sex is the definition of rape and produces shame in the girl. She knows that her innocence is lost, physically and emotionally and that her trust in people is gone. She remembers, “He said I love you Spanish girl, I love you.” Esperanza Cordero learns quite early in life that sex and desire can be a trap underneath the cover of love. She decides not to choose the model of life around her. She is no longer naive, trusting, or innocent. Her life decisions are made against her new frame of reference. The wondrous joy of the little girl is permanently tempered by knowledge and experience. Elizabeth Malia
CISNEROS, SANDRAâ•… Woman Hollering Creek and Other Storiesâ•… (1991)
Sandra Cisneros’s Woman Hollering Creek is a collection of vignettes and short stories that focus on contemporary Chicana and Chicano experiences. Although each story features plots that are self-contained, all the stories are interconnected by common themes of patriarchy, betrayal, poverty, and racism, as well as hope, love, endurance, humor, and faith. The book is divided into three sections that focus on particular motifs. The seven stories in “Part I: My Lucy Friend Who Smells Like Corn,” recount different childhood experiences. Cisneros captures the sentiments of a young girl who remembers spending time in Mexico City with her grandfather in “Tepeyac” and a child’s excitement of going to the movie theater with her family in “Mexican Movies.” In stories about mundane events, Cisneros reveals the rich and complex experiences of bicultural children. In “Part II: One Holy Night,” the collection shifts from childhood stories to teenage protagonists. The two stories in this section examine how young Chicanas negotiate restrictive cultural and religious notions of female sex and sexuality. The last section, “Part III: There Was a Man, There
Was a Woman,” contains 13 stories that focus on the complexities of love, marriage, and desire. Many of the stories examine women’s struggles to leave violent and unsatisfying relationships including the collection’s most-discussed story, “Woman Hollering Creek.” While “Eyes of Zapata” depicts a woman who questions cultural double standards, “Bien Pretty” shows how women find self-empowerment by challenging limiting gender norms. Belinda Linn Rincon
Gender in Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories
In “Barbie-Q,” a story in the opening section of Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories, Sandra Cisneros describes a young narrator who plays dress-up with her Barbie doll, Cisneros reveals how a seemingly innocent toy for girls actually instructs them on how to accept socially constructed notions of femininity represented by Barbie’s blonde hair, tanned skin, and impossible bodily proportions. Although the narrator’s race is not explicitly described, we can assume that she is Chicana like the book’s other Chicana and Chicano characters. By portraying how a Latina girl cherishes her Barbie, Cisneros uses irony to critique Barbie as an icon of idealized Anglo-American feminine beauty and its influence on the way girls of color view womanhood. Barbie’s standard of beauty is physically impossible for the narrator to emulate, just as the cost of a new Barbie and her accompanying outfits are impossible for the narrator’s parents to afford. Cisneros emphasizes the narrator’s racial and class status to show how Barbie, with her slightly melted foot, is not the perfect representation of universal beauty after all. In “Marlboro Man,” Cisneros focuses on a gender icon of masculinity. The Marlboro Man portrays the image of a cowboy who is master of the range and whose physicality and cigarette smoking make him irresistible to women. Cisneros debunks this image of heterosexual masculinity as the story’s two narrators gossip about the man who was the original model for the Marlboro ads. They describe how he was supposedly a gay man who died of AIDS. Through their conversation, Cisneros reveals how gender icons can be destabilized.
Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories â•…â•… 289 Chicanas are influenced by bicultural and binational gender icons as well. In “Eyes of Zapata,” Cisneros describes the life of the Mexican revolutionary Emiliano Zapata through his lover, Inés Alfaro. Although Zapata is often regarded as a national hero and defender of land rights, Cisneros complicates his image by revealing the society’s sexual double standards and the patriarchy that condones Zapata’s extramarital affairs while killing women (like Inés’s mother) who behave the same way. Most of Cisneros’s stories focus on Mexican motherhood and usually feature one or more of the following three figures: La Llorona, La Malinche, and La Virgen de Guadalupe (the Virgin of Guadalupe). The first two are bad mothers and the third one is good only because she is passive and selfless. These figures compose the whore/virgin dichotomy that the culture uses to influence women’s behavior. Yet Cisneros’s characters challenge and revise each figure’s attributes to construct more empowering feminist interpretations. La Llorona, or the Weeping Woman, is based on a Mexican folktale about a mother who drowns her children out of vengeance for her cheating husband. In “Woman Hollering Creek,” Cleófilas does not drown her children in the creek; rather, she leaves her abusive husband. The story transforms women like Cleófilas from weeping mothers into hollering women who find the power to escape. La Malinche was an indigenous woman who was enslaved by the Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés in 1519 and eventually bore his children. Because of her role as translator and guide for the Spanish, she is often blamed for the downfall of the Aztec Empire. She is vilified by Mexican and Chicano culture as a traitor because of her relationship with Cortés. In “Never Marry a Mexican,” La Malinche is alluded to when Clemencia’s Chicana mother tells her not to marry a Mexican because of the difficulties she had with Clemencia’s Mexican father. This first act of betrayal is compounded later by the affair she has with a white man while Clemencia’s father is on his deathbed. Clemencia will follow her mother’s example by also having an affair with a white married man named Drew, who calls Clemencia “Malinalli” (Malinche’s indigenous name). Clemencia’s behavior hurts her when Drew refuses to leave his wife for her because he could never marry a Mexican.
Any woman who rejects patriarchy is considered to be a traitor and is called “Malinche”—such as Rosario in “Little Miracles, Kept Promises,” who refuses to be a submissive wife and mother. She stops praying to the Mexican patron saint, La Virgen de Guadalupe, because the Virgin represents self-abnegation and passivity—the idealized qualities of Mexican womanhood. Rosario resumes her worship of the Virgin only after she learns about the connection between the Virgin and the powerful Aztec goddesses who preceded her. Belinda Linn Rincon
Sex and Sexuality in Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories
Sandra Cisneros’s Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories explores the power and danger of female sexuality and how institutions like family, marriage, and the Catholic Church attempt to control it. Part 2 of the book focuses on stories of adolescence and shows how a lack of knowledge about sex can lead to tragedy. In “One Holy Night,” a girl’s curiosity about sex and her family’s refusal to talk about it lead to serious consequences when she is raped by a 37-year-old serial killer named Chato. He tells her that he is the descendant of Mayan kings lamenting the loss of cultural traditions. When the narrator falls for his story and his tears, he takes advantage of her naïveté. After he rapes her, she feels like a Mayan queen and skips home, feeling content that she has learned what sex is. Her reaction minimizes the rape, but Chato’s extensive gun collection and the extreme age disparity remind us that force and violence have shaped the encounter. Her sense of empowerment ends when her family learns that she is pregnant. They take her out of the eighth grade and send her to live in Mexico before her pregnancy starts to show and can lead to family shame. Ironically, her own mother had been sent from Mexico to the United States when she, too, became pregnant from premarital sex. The story emphasizes how families are invested in controlling female sexuality and view it as a threat to their moral standards and social status. The narrator’s family uses shame and exile to penalize her. In this case, the punishment may have helped save her life as Chato, who previously murdered 11 women, later returns to find her.
290â•…â•… Cisneros, Sandra In “My Tocaya,” a Catholic high school tries to control the contact between boys and girls by limiting interaction and promoting abstinence. The 13-year-old Patricia, who uses a British accent to sound sexy, rebels against this backdrop and an abusive home by running away. Many fear the worst after the body of a young girl is found in a ditch. Again, Cisneros shows how sex is treated as a mystery and social taboo and how girls deal with social restrictions and street violence. In part 3, Cisneros focuses on stories about adults where violence and female sexuality remain dominant themes. “The Eyes of Zapata” tells the story of Inés, a mistress of the Mexican revolutionary Emiliano Zapata who contemplates the difference between love and sex in a time of war. During the Mexican Revolution, women become war booty as many are raped by soldiers from both sides and men like Zapata exercise the socially condoned male prerogative of having multiple lovers (and children) outside of marriage. Zapata is a “mujeriego,” or womanizer, and although Inés is one of his lovers, she questions why society condones male infidelity yet condemns it among women. Her own mother serves as the ultimate example of this violent double standard. Years earlier, she was gang-raped, mutilated, and killed by a group of men (and former lovers) as punishment for having extramarital sex. The attack’s brutality emphasizes the community’s anxiety over an unrestrained female sexuality that dares to challenge male privilege and control. Cisneros’s stories also examine eroticism in male characters. For example, Zapata may be a “mujeriego,” but he is also eroticized through Inés’s detailed descriptions of his body. Through such intimate details, Cisneros transforms Zapata from a national legend to a sexualized, vulnerable man. The title of the story “Bien Pretty” refers to a man—not a woman—named Flavio. He poses for Lupe, a Chicana artist who uses him as a model for a painting of a popular Mexican myth which, in her version, exploits the male anatomy. The most erotic male character is Rudy in “Remember the Alamo.” Onstage, Rudy is known as “Tristán,” a dancer in a drag show who mesmerizes audiences with sensual dances that combine desire and death, longing and loneliness. When he
becomes “Tristán” (a play on the word triste, which means “sad”), Rudy wields power over adoring fans. He also dances metaphorically with Death, suggesting that the transgressive sensuality of a gay man’s performance can lead to potential violence in an unforgiving straight society. This power he has over the audience and Death compensates for the powerlessness he feels over a life of poverty, rejection, childhood memories of sexual abuse, and potential homophobic violence. The stage is a safe place for Tristán’s display of sensuality, and it is Rudy’s emotional refuge from a brutal reality. Belinda Linn Rincon
Suffering in Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories
Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories, by Sandra Cisneros, opens with a series of vignettes that portray children who suffer the hardships of poverty. In “Salvador Late or Early,” Salvador is a young boy who dutifully takes care of his younger brothers, yet his own childhood is cut short by the weight of his responsibilities. While he plays the role of a caring older brother admirably, the narrator subtly reveals the difficulties Salvador faces as his childhood is marked by poverty and isolation. He holds within him a history of pain and scars whose causes remain unknown to us, yet we can guess that they involve his experience as a Latino boy whose economic and ethnic background account for why his teacher does not recall his name, why he feels or is made to feel inferior every time he speaks, and why he has no friends. In other stories, the effects of poverty are obscured by Cisneros’s use of child narrators who describe economic hardships in naive ways. For example, the narrator in “My Lucy Friend Who Smells Like Corn” is envious of the fun Lucy must have sleeping with her eight sisters in one bed, but she does not realize the arrangement is by necessity and not by choice. Cisneros also shows how suffering has a cultural and gendered dimension within Mexican and Chicano communities. Mexican telenovelas, which are similar to soap operas, often feature female characters who suffer for love. In “Woman Hollering Creek,” Cleófilas watches a telenovela called Tú o Nadie, You or No One, whose female protagonist
Waiting for the Barbarians â•…â•… 291 endures the pain of betrayal but continues to love the man in her life in spite of everything. Cleófilas longs for the kind of romance depicted in telenovelas while she absorbs the message they teach female viewers: Women must suffer for love. Cleófilas’s life begins to mimic the telenovela as her husband becomes abusive and unfaithful. Not only does she become the suffering woman she sees on television, but she also starts to mirror the suffering figure of La Llorona, or the Weeping Woman. Based on a Mexican folktale, La Llorona is a story about a woman who has drowned her children in a river and spends eternity haunting bodies of water where she can be heard weeping over their deaths. In many versions of the tale, she is said to have killed her children as an act of revenge against her unfaithful husband. The creek outside Cleófilas’s house is called “Woman Hollering Creek,” an allusion to La Llorona, and as Cleófilas sits beside it with her son, she hears La Llorona’s voice calling to her. By incorporating Mexican telenovelas and La Llorona into the story, Cisneros emphasizes the cultural practices and traditions that condone the suffering of women like Cleófilas. Suffering also has a religious meaning and is embodied in one of Mexico’s most important feminine archetypes: the Virgin of Guadalupe. In Mexico, the Virgin appeared to the Indian Juan Diego in 1531 at the temple where the Aztec goddess Tonantzín was worshipped. This coincidence made the Catholic conversion of the indigenous population easier, but it also endeared the Virgin to Mexican believers who saw her as both the suffering Virgin Mary and as a symbol of hope that people pray to in time of need. In “Little Miracles, Kept Promises,” Cisneros shows how Mexican Catholics often leave messages on church walls for the Virgin that contain prayers or promises made to the Virgin. Through these ex-votos, we learn of the community’s ailments, which range from the trivial (a boy prays for his acne to clear up) to the heartbreaking (a husband prays for his dying wife). The story ends as Rosario leaves her own ex-voto and describes how she refused to pray to the Virgin for years because she rejected the image of the suffering, self-sacrificing woman that the Virgin represented. It was only when Rosario realized that the Virgin
also embodied the strength of Tonantzín that she accepted the Virgin and understood that suffering can lead to empathizing with others, which can then lead to healing. Belinda Linn Rincon
COETZEE, J. M.â•… Waiting for the Barbariansâ•… (1980)
Waiting for the Barbarians, first published in 1980, is the South African author J. M. Coetzee’s third novel. Coetzee (b. 1940) won the James Tait Black Memorial Prize in 1980 for Waiting for the Barbarians, and most scholars and critics now recognize this work as one of his best. The novel is set on the frontier of an unidentified country currently occupied by a nameless empire. There are three main characters: the Magistrate, Colonel Joll, and the barbarian girl. The Magistrate lives a peaceful existence, managing a small town and commanding a garrison of soldiers within the walls of his frontier fort, until Colonel Joll arrives from the empire’s headquarters. Colonel Joll disrupts the quiet frontier by sending out raiding parties to capture any “barbarians” found on the land. One of the prisoners, the barbarian girl, occupies a soft place in the heart of the Magistrate after she is tortured by Colonel Joll and his men, and the Magistrate takes it upon himself to care for her. A series of decisions by the Magistrate concerning her welfare results in Colonel Joll imprisoning and torturing the Magistrate as a traitor. Many themes, including cruelty, race, ethics, freedom, identity, isolation, and suffering, are discussed within the context of Waiting for the Barbarians. Although Coetzee is notorious for never directly addressing an issue, a discerning reader will identify many conflicts within the text that are comparable to modern-day issues. Colin Christopher
Cruelty in Waiting for the Barbarians
Before the arrival of Colonel Joll, the Magistrate in Waiting for the Barbarians seems utterly unaware of the presence of cruelty. In the early pages of the novel, he describes for Colonel Joll an idyllic scene of fishing with native villagers, and when it is time
292â•…â•… Coetzee, J. M. for bed, the reader is treated to a nighttime of silence and beauty as the Magistrate takes his mat to the rooftop to sleep. The Magistrate reflects on the scene, adding that he has been here for a while, and it seems he has grown complacent in this comfortable situation. However, the arrival of Colonel Joll changes everything, and the Magistrate soon realizes that Joll will impose both physical and psychological cruelty in order to get the “truth.” Two prisoners (an old man and a boy, “barbarians” captured from a frontier raid) are interrogated by Colonel Joll even though they have a plausible excuse for their whereabouts. People within the barracks report hearing screaming in the night, and in the morning, when the Magistrate goes to check on the prisoners, he finds that the old man is dead. The idea that “pain is truth; all else is subject to doubt” from his earlier conversation with Colonel Joll is still fresh in his mind, and the Magistrate begins to feel uneasy about the situation happening in his fort. The Magistrate’s apprehension is not unfounded, as Colonel Joll enlists most of the soldiers at the barracks to go with him on a raid of the countryside. Colonel Joll bases his decision for the raid on information given to him by the boy, who, while enduring extreme physical torture, has told Colonel Joll that barbarian tribes are joining together to fight against the empire. However, as the Magistrate discovers, the boy has become very ill due to an untreated wound, and the torture he has suffered during interrogation has left him so weak that it seems he would say almost anything to end the pain. Nevertheless, Colonel Joll insists the boy come on the raid as a guide, and to the Magistrate’s horror, prisoners from the raids begin arriving back at the barracks only four days after Colonel Joll leaves. When Colonel Joll himself returns from the raids, his interrogations continue. Five days go by, and Colonel Joll tells the Magistrate he will leave. Once Colonel Joll has gone, the Magistrate orders the release of all prisoners and is appalled at the conditions in which he finds the natives he knows as simple “fishing people.” One girl in particular stirs something in the Magistrate, and he offers her work in order to keep her from being a vagrant or, perhaps, in order to keep her from being seen as a reminder of what Colonel Joll had done. It turns out that
during her interrogation, the girl’s torturers blinded her in both eyes by forcing her to stare at the glowing hot tines of a fork, and they broke both of her ankles. The torture took place while the girl’s father was forced to watch. The pain inflicted on the man’s daughter would force the truth from him, in the mind of Colonel Joll, but now the Magistrate realizes that mental cruelty can be worse even than physical cruelty because the girl’s father, powerless to help his daughter, commits actions that lead to his death. The worst is yet to come. A crisis of conscience leads the Magistrate to undertake an arduous journey in which he returns the girl to her people. Upon his return, he finds army troops waiting for him. They remove him from his post and take him prisoner, charging him with treason. Through isolation and misinformation, the Magistrate’s reputation among the people at the barracks is seriously damaged. He is imprisoned, beaten, and not allowed to defend himself against any of the charges that are leveled against him. At one point, he is even taken outside and made to believe that he is about to be hung. He is held aloft until the brink of death, then released, crashing roughly to the ground. The combination of physical and emotional torture suffered by the Magistrate in front of the very people he used to govern is the height of the empire’s cruelty, and he no longer feels part of the empire. Colin Christopher
Isolation in Waiting for the Barbarians
J. M. Coetzee has long been regarded as a solitary, reclusive person. Many of his novels contain characters dealing with isolation of some sort: In Dusklands, Jacobus Coetzee travels only with servants whom he sees as little more than faithful animals; in The Life & Times of Michael K, Michael K travels alone and hardly ever speaks; and in Disgrace, David Lurie refuses to see his own actions in the same light that he sees the actions of others. The main characters in Waiting for the Barbarians—the Magistrate, the barbarian girl, and Colonel Joll—hold true to this pattern of characters who are isolated from something. However, it is the Magistrate, more than any of the others, who is isolated from almost everything around him.
Waiting for the Barbarians â•…â•… 293 The Magistrate sets himself apart from Colonel Joll, the outsider who has come to his settlement, in the very first sentence of the novel: “I have never seen anything like it” (1). Of course, the Magistrate is only talking about Colonel Joll’s sunglasses, but the tone is set. He soon finds himself at odds with Joll’s interrogation techniques as well as his intentions to raid the frontier. Joll hopes to capture more prisoners so he can gain information about the barbarians’ plans; meanwhile, the Magistrate wishes Joll would leave well enough alone so that the frontier settlement could go back to its quiet, idyllic existence. Throughout most of the interrogations, Joll has the willing assistance of the Magistrate’s men. The Magistrate questions these men about what happens during the interrogations, and they usually give him an account that sounds very much like something Joll told them to say. Sometimes the Magistrate gets them to admit to something else that happened through indirect questioning, but it is clear that Joll has specifically provided a story for the men to tell because he sees the Magistrate as little more than a hindrance to the job he must perform. The true vastness of the Magistrate’s isolation from all he has known is apparent during one of his visits to the ruins he has been excavating in the desert. He has heard children’s stories about the ghosts who inhabit the ruins during a certain hour of each night, and he wishes to see or hear the ghosts for himself. He notices everything as the sky grows darker and listens for every sound that might signal the arrival of the spirits, but the only sign he recognizes is “the patter of sand driving from nowhere to nowhere across the wastes,” and soon he falls asleep. The Magistrate, as he leaves the desert to go back to the settlement, thinks to himself, “How fortunate that no one sees me!,” realizing how foolish he has been, sitting out in the desert and listening for ghosts, based solely on the stories of children. After all, no adults would tell him about ghosts in the desert. Indeed, throughout the novel, most adults avoid contact with the Magistrate, unless they are servants responding to direct orders. Even the barbarian girl, whom the Magistrate thinks he is becoming very close to, rebuffs him in the end. He realizes that he cannot know what is going on in her mind but deludes himself into
thinking that she cares for and has grown dependent on him. Even the reader does not know why the girl allows him to wash her each night, yet she does. She accepts the job he has given her and stays under the roof he has offered to her. However, at the first opportunity she is given to return to her home, she jumps at the chance. The Magistrate asks her to return with him of her own free will, and she responds bluntly: “Why? No. I do not want to go back to that place.” On the trip back to the settlement, and throughout the rest of the novel, the Magistrate can only put together bits and pieces of what the barbarian girl looks like until, at the end, another woman tells him that both she and the barbarian girl always felt he was “somewhere else” when he was with them. Finally, a reader of Waiting for the Barbarians must consider the isolation imposed by the story’s setting. Not only is the settlement in the desert, but the inhabitants seem unaware of the outside world. (Consider how foreign a pair of sunglasses seemed to the Magistrate at the beginning.) In addition, the empire is given no name or geographical location. Coetzee does very few things by accident in his writing, and here he isolates the story in place and time. Much is left open to the reader’s interpretation in Coetzee’s novels, but the isolation of both the story and the Magistrate in Waiting for the Barbarians is unquestionable. Colin Christopher
Race in Waiting for the Barbarians
Although race seems to be an overriding factor in most of J. M. Coetzee’s works, it is hardly, if ever, mentioned. It is almost as if Coetzee makes a conscious decision not to talk about race, and Waiting for the Barbarians is no exception to this pattern. For a long time, Coetzee lived and worked in his native South Africa, and so it is easy for a reader of his novels to assume that his settings are African. Given what is known of South Africa’s recent history, a reader may also assume that Coetzee’s themes specifically refer to race. In Waiting for the Barbarians, however, race can only be assumed by the reader. In the beginning of the story, the Magistrate is talking to a prisoner in front of Colonel Joll, and the prisoner’s face is
294â•…â•… Coleridge, Samuel Taylor described as “grey,” but taken in context, this is only because the prisoner is dirty from making a long trek on foot. All other descriptions of the two prisoners show them only as human and do not describe any racial characteristics. One of the only words in Waiting for the Barbarians that could possibly be construed as describing a difference in races is dark. The narrator relates that “there is no woman living along the frontier who has not dreamed of a dark barbarian hand coming from under the bed to grip her ankle.” How is the reader supposed to interpret this statement? Many times the word dark is used as a synonym for the words evil or bad, and it is entirely possible that the narrator is using it in this way. After all, monsters coming from under the bed are bad, or evil, and they only try to grab us when we have turned out the lights—when it is “dark.” Even when the Magistrate describes children playing in the snow as “square, dark figures,” he contrasts them against the “whiteness” of the snow. Compared to freshly fallen snow, almost anything could be described as “dark.” And then there is the question of the girl. So much of what the reader is led to assume about the girl brings up the question of her race. The Magistrate describes her as having “straight black eyebrows and the glossy black hair of the barbarians,” as well as a “broad mouth, [and] the black eyes.” Yet nowhere in the physical description of the woman is her specific race mentioned. The reader knows only that the Magistrate considers her one of the former barbarian prisoners, and that he finds a soft spot in his heart for her as winter approaches. But just because the girl is from a barbarian tribe, the reader cannot necessarily assume anything about her race. In fact, as the story progresses, the Magistrate describes the girl more and more with terms that are less “dark.” For instance, when he describes what sex with her would be like in his mind, she is the “milk .╯.╯. honey .╯.╯. bread” while he is the “acid .╯.╯. ashes .╯.╯. chalk.” The Magistrate sees her body in front of the fire as “glowing a vegetal gold.” Through the rest of the story, even after the girl has been returned to her tribe by the Magistrate, the barbarians are simply described as barbarians. The Magistrate explores no physical features of anyone other than himself, and he describes him-
self as growing more and more like an animal. He hears that the barbarians are responsible for recent atrocities against the community, but he has no tangible proof other than descriptions of a barbarian suspected of rape. The children who describe the barbarian “recognized him as a barbarian by his ugliness” (123). It is ironic that a reader will assume something that is never mentioned. By putting together the fact that Coetzee is from South Africa, and that Waiting for the Barbarians is about an empire trying to colonize lands currently controlled by “barbarian” tribes, a reader may dangerously misperceive what is happening within the story. Ultimately, by not specifically introducing the race of any character in Waiting for the Barbarians, Coetzee forces readers to confront their own views of race. Colin Christopher
COLERIDGE, SAMUEL TAYLORâ•… “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”â•… (1798)
Perpetually haunting and evocative, and a seminal romanticist work, Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” was first published in 1798, when it opened Lyrical Ballads, the collected poems of Coleridge (1772–1834) and William Wordsworth. Central to romantic interests were exploring the role of the imagination and looking to nature and ancient literary forms for inspiration and expression of human thought, emotion, and curiosity. The poem’s original title, “The Rime of the Ancyent Marinere,” reflects its mode as a medieval ballad. Although the spelling was soon modernized, the style generally retains the ballad stanza. The frame narrative depicts two characters on the threshold of a church, the Ancient Mariner telling the tale of his journey to a Wedding-Guest anxious to get to the ceremony. But it is the mariner’s tale of a torturous sea voyage, his shooting of the albatross, and his search for redemption that is unforgettable. This internal narrative works on many closely entwined levels, creating thematic webs of nature, fate, and death as it treats allegorical, metaphorical, and metaphysical forms of storytelling.
“The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”â•…â•… 295 Coleridge revised the poem numerous times; the version in his 1817 collection Sibylline Leaves included the marginal glosses and the scene of Death and Life-in-Death. Like the Ancient Mariner’s story, the poem continues to enthrall modern readers, taking them on its journey of awe, horror, and wonder. All the essays here refer to the 1817 version of the poem. Jennie MacDonald
Death in “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”
Readers are alerted to the looming presence of death in the first line of “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner.” Because the mariner is not merely old but ancient, he is very near to death, nearer than the young man he detains who is on his way to a wedding. Not merely a ceremony, a wedding celebrates the couple’s new life together and the births of the children they presumably will have. Juxtaposing the appearance of the Ancient Mariner to the happy bride entering the chapel signals the conflict between death and life and man’s position in relation to both, throughout the poem. The image of water as life-affirming, enabling the ship on its voyage at the beginning of the mariner’s tale, soon becomes an image of death. Driven southward by a storm, the ship leaves behind the beneficent Atlantic seas above the equator to become hemmed in by Antarctic ice and fog that threaten to destroy both men and ship. Later, freed from the ice and aided by a “good south wind” (l. 87), they pass into the Pacific Ocean, where things initially seem promising, as “The fair breeze blew, the white foam flew” (l. 103). Immediately, however, “Down dropt the breeze” (l. 107), and the ship is becalmed. Not only is the ship immobile, the men suffer in the heat and from the maddening proximity of “Water, water, every where, / Nor any drop to drink” (l. 122). Now, the sea is figured as filled with death and rotting, and a skeletal ship bearing Death itself sails with no wind across the ocean. Although Death has until this point been alluded to in other forms, here he is actually personified and associated with the sea. Death is also associated with “The Night-Mair Life-in-Death .╯.╯.╯/ Who thicks man’s blood with cold” (ll. 193–194). Figured as a female to partner
Death, Life-in-Death wins the mariner in a game of dice, and he looks on in horror as the rest of his shipmates drop dead, each cursing him “with his eye” (l. 215). One of those sailors is his own nephew, whose death most probably ends the mariner’s family line. Even worse is Life-in-Death’s curse, which preserves the mariner from Death only to make him suffer alone, to witness the reanimation of the dead to operate the ship and later the death of the ship itself. During his solitary vigil, he recognizes that even the horrid creatures of the sea are God’s creatures and blesses them, transforming evil into good. His own perception changes as well, and this begins the mariner’s process of redemption. In the end, the sea, influenced by heavenly beings, will finally return the mariner northward, where he will be rescued and eternally compelled to tell the story of his sin and its expiation. The mariner’s great sin is his shooting of the albatross, the seabird who accompanied the ship through the ice and away from certain destruction. The death of the bird is reflected in the becalming of the ship, the ceasing of the wind and of the movement of the water, as well as the death of hope among the men. The albatross is aligned with the rest of God’s creatures. More important, it is aligned with God himself when it blesses the mariner in God’s name. Later, the spirits affirm, God “loved the bird that loved the man / Who shot him with his bow” (ll. 404–405). As Christ was hung on the cross and his blood flowed for the absolution of mankind, so the albatross is hung upon the mariner’s neck until the man is absolved through suffering and penance. The blood that signifies the death of the albatross also signifies life, just as water embodies both. Life and death are then coexistent. “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” creates life from death, a story of redemption from a story of senseless murder that is the sin of mankind. Beginning with the death of the albatross through the metaphorical rendering of death in natural forms, particularly the sea, through to the actual representation of the entity of Death and his actions, the poem offers images and concepts of life in its metaphorical and spiritual forms. But this redemption is not complete, as the Ancient Mariner must continue
296â•…â•… Coleridge, Samuel Taylor to tell his story to keep it alive for his listeners, who themselves will reiterate his tale. Jennie MacDonald
Fate in “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”
In Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” the mariner’s shooting of the albatross stands as the pivotal image around which revolve both the internal narrative of the Ancient Mariner’s journey and the frame narrative of his telling the tale to the Wedding-Guest. The bird’s appearance heralds the salvation of the ship from the ice, befriending the mariner, but without warning or apparent motivation, the mariner shoots the albatross. The remainder of his narrative recounts his ultimately solitary journey toward redemption for committing an action that can be interpreted not only as murder and a sin against nature but also as a refiguring of the death of Christ. But why did the mariner kill the albatross? The question of motivation surrounding this action of the internal narrative has a parallel in the frame narrative. Both involve the role of fate and are interdependent. The mariner’s shooting of the albatross was meant to happen; his choice of the Wedding-Guest for listener was meant to be. Fate decrees an action and is irresistible. At the beginning, the frame narrative appears to simply relate the event of an old man telling a story to a younger one. As the wedding guests arrive, the Ancient Mariner “stoppeth one of three” (l. 2). The young man asks, “Now wherefore stopp’st thou me?” (l. 4). He means to go on by, but he is also asking a question with deeper implications— “Why do you choose me for your attention?” This question, though, will not be answered until the end of the Ancient Mariner’s story, when the old sailor details the nature of his penance: “Since then, at an uncertain hour, / That agony returns: / And till my ghastly tale is told, / This heart within me burns” (ll. 582–585). But he cannot tell the tale to just anyone. He must wander until “That moment that his face I see, / I know the man that must hear me: / To him my tale I teach” (ll. 588–590). The Wedding-Guest on this occasion is that particular man, that particular listener. He is fated to hear the mariner’s tale, to learn its lesson of unthinking crime and painful
repentance, so that he, too, is alerted to the magnitude of love and God’s grace. This story has such magnitude because of the bird’s significance. The sailors’ response to the appearance of the albatross signals this is no ordinary bird: “As if it had been a Christian soul, / We hailed it in God’s name” (ll. 65–66). Linguistically aligned with God, the albatross resembles Christ, the friend of humankind whom humankind crucifies. It is thus significant that the mariner shoots the bird with a crossbow rather than an ordinary bow. Shortly after, the image of the cross becomes conflated with not only the albatross—which, “Instead of the cross .╯.╯. About my neck was hung” (ll. 141–142)—but also with the mariner himself. The albatross takes the place of the cross around the mariner’s neck, and the mariner takes the place of the cross on which Christ was hung. The appearance of Christ on earth is necessary to make flesh God’s friendship to mankind. His crucifixion also must occur—is fated to occur—to teach mankind of the possibility of salvation, of life after death, which makes living rightly on earth imperative. In teaching others through telling his tale, the Ancient Mariner is fulfilling his fate. The shooting of the albatross and the events that follow provide him with a story to tell and suggest the circular nature of fate. The mariner must tell his story, and the Wedding-Guest must listen to it. But without the mariner’s fateful action of killing the albatross, there would be no story to tell. He has no choice in this action, only the committing of it. It seems a random action, but it brings about the rest of the events, including the fact that he is fated to tell it. The idea of randomness literally appears in the scene in which Death and Life-in-Death are casting dice for the ship’s crew. All drop down dead except for the mariner, whom Life-in-Death wins apparently by luck of the dice. But even this random event appears governed by fate, for none but the mariner could tell the whole of the story from the perspective of the individual who set the horrifying and later mystical events in motion. None but he is in a position to relay that story in all its terror and awe and thereby effectively impress its meaning upon the Wedding-Guest and the reader. Jennie MacDonald
“The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”â•…â•… 297
Nature in “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”
The “rime” of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s Ancient Mariner denotes not only the “rhyme” that is the mariner’s story of his voyage, but also the “rime” that is a condensation of saltwater, mist, or fog and that collects on objects exposed to it for some time. Like the rime that collects on a ship, the mariner is coated with the rime of his experience. The Wedding-Guest acquires a veneer of it as he is exposed to the mariner’s story and the presence of the old salt himself. The first object identified in the title of “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” “rime” serves to underline the nature of the work itself as a poem, points to the ancient spelling of the word rime in medieval ballads, and suggests a link between nature and humanity. “Rime” asserts a literary relationship between “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” and medieval ballads. Coleridge’s poem generally consists of fourline stanzas (quatrains) of balladic meter in which the second and fourth lines rhyme. The poem also invokes medieval imagery, including “The merry minstrelsy” at the wedding (l. 36), which alludes to the ballad-poet or minstrel. The Sun “flecked with bars .╯.╯. As if through a dungeon-grate he peer’d” (ll. 177–179), “The water, like a witch’s oils” (l. 129), and “the elfish light” (l. 275) of the water snakes all present images of nature—cosmos, sea, and animal—through medieval images of imprisonment, heresy, and superstition. All can be associated with the unnatural: A dungeon is built by man and deprives man of his naturally free state, witches convert nature to unnatural uses, and elves were viewed in medieval times as demonic spirits. Another discernible medieval idea is the great chain of being. This is a hierarchical construct that extends from God at the top to the lowliest creatures of the earth at the bottom and human beings above animals but below, for example, saints and angels. In the poem, images of the highest and lowliest creatures mingle, from the albatross that inhabits the heights of the sky to the water snake coiling in the depths of the sea. Rather than occupying a position above all the animals, however, the Ancient Mariner seems figuratively located between these two creatures. By shooting the albatross (literally bring-
ing it down to the earth’s surface) and blessing the water snake (endowing it with a spiritual nature and thus raising it figuratively), he brings both creatures toward this central position. The concern with descent and elevation can also be traced in the ship’s journey. Upon leaving his home shore, the mariner notes, “The Sun came up on the left” (l. 25), indicating a departure point in the north, and journey toward the equator with the sun rising “Higher and higher every day, / Till over the mast at noon” (ll. 29–30). Driven by a storm, “southward aye we fled” (l. 50) until “ice, mast-high, came floating by” (l. 53), and the ship becomes trapped in the southernmost ocean of the earth. The albatross leads the ship back north but westward, for “The Sun now rose upon the right” (l. 83). After the mariner shoots the albatross, the ship will continue to drift until, after his blessing of the water snakes, he is absolved by the Hermit. At length, he returns to “his own countree” (l. 570), completing a geographical journey of descent and elevation, although he will be forced to wander, telling his tale. Finally, Coleridge employs the sea, the weather, and the cosmos to parallel the condition of the mariner’s soul and the human condition in general, suggesting the imminent peril in which humankind lives at all moments. The journey begins under a fair wind, but man can become incautious and, more dangerous still, complacent, his soul frozen until some beacon awakens it. Inexplicably, the mariner shoots the albatross, dooming his own soul to the hellish parching torment of the southwestern seas, until he recognizes the beauty of the water snakes and blesses them. That night “it rained” (l. 300), and the sky is filled with meteors, as though even the heavens are celebrating the mariner’s learned lesson that mankind must love “all things both great and small” to mirror God’s own nature. Concepts of nature echo throughout the poem, reflecting the nature of the poem itself and the imagery of nature representing the development of the mariner’s soul. Together, they deposit a new layer of rime not only on the Wedding-Guest but also on the reader. Jennie MacDonald
298â•…â•… Conrad, Joseph
CONRAD, JOSEPHâ•… Heart of Darknessâ•… (1899, 1902)
Joseph Conrad’s novella Heart of Darkness, a seminal work in the history of modernist literature as well as a scathing attack on European imperialism, was first published in Blackwood’s Magazine in 1899; it was published in book form in 1902. Heart of Darkness tells the story of a young, adventurous English seaman, Marlow, and his encounter with the far reaches of empire as he travels up the Congo River. At the same time, it is an internal journey of self-discovery to the heart of darkness that lies within. Like most of Joseph Conrad’s early stories, Heart of Darkness is based on his personal experiences as a merchant seaman. Arriving in the Congo in 1890 to take command of a small steamship, Conrad (1857–1924) witnessed firsthand the devastating human impact of European colonialism on an uprooted native population. Yet Heart of Darkness is far more than an anti-imperialist political tract or an anthropological study of detribalization. It is also a masterpiece of modernist fiction. Conrad’s personal experiences are those of a homeless exile, a loner and linguistic outsider, a Pole sailing on French and British ships, a European in Asia or Africa, a nonnative speaker writing in English. He was, in short, a man who lived in the borderlands of culture at the crossroads of tradition and modernity. Conrad’s narrative techniques in Heart of Darkness capture this fragmented alienation and thus prefigure in many ways the multiple perspectives, impressionistic representations, linguistic sophistication, mythic archetypes, and psychological subjectivity we have come to associate with modernist literature. Within the framework of Marlow’s journey upriver to find Kurtz is another voyage, an inner journey where Conrad’s narrative confronts such themes as alienation, ambition, community, freedom, identity, isolation, oppression, race, and work. Michael Zeitler
Community in Heart of Darkness
Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness is a novel about community and the effects of European colonization—its disastrous consequences for the stability of traditional native cultures and its potential moral
and psychological consequences for the European colonists themselves. The theme of community, in its diverse possible meanings, emerges in the framing story on board the Nellie, as Conrad’s unnamed narrator credits the “bond of the sea” for uniting the five on board through common work, professional experiences, and underlying purpose. They are moored at Gravesend on the Thames, and the river connects them to London, the “Great City,” and to the sea and the far reaches of the British Empire, just as their work connects them to Sir John Franklin, Sir Francis Drake, and the larger historical community of British exploration and colonization. Marlow, as he prefaces his own narrative, suggests a comparison between themselves and the Roman conquerors of ancient Britain, who also were “men enough to face the darkness,” held together only by their “devotion to efficiency” and “an unselfish belief in the idea—something you can set up, and bow down before, and offer a sacrifice to,” as Marlow and the others aboard the Nellie have done. Throughout his narrative, Marlow emphasizes the potential for both individual and communal degeneration, for losing sight of that “bond,” that “idea” which ties individuals to a larger community of meanings, associations, and values. Even before his arrival in Africa, as Marlow prepares to leave the Company offices in Brussels, the examining doctor warns him of the “mental changes of individuals” that take place on the “inside” of those returning from the Congo. Marlow’s descriptions convey his sense of the horrors of the Belgian exploitation of the Congo. The chain gangs of African native work conscripts, the whippings and mutilations, the forced marches, the “grove of death,” the indiscriminate cannon shots into the bush, and the Europeans’ treatment of the steamboat crew all speak to the colonizers’ alienation from the moral values of the larger world community. Marlow, the practical British seaman with his deeply felt allegiance to work, efficiency, and productivity, sees in the absence of these values yet another sign of moral degeneracy replacing community-based responsibility. Buildings burn because the fire brigade is helpless and inefficient; they do not get rebuilt because there is no straw to make the bricks. Ships are not repaired because replacement rivets have not been sent. Mar-
Heart of Darknessâ•…â•… 299 low labors to bring order into the chaotic operations of the El Dorado Exploring Expedition. Later, upriver, a well-used book on seamanship he finds in an abandoned trading post represents for him “an honest concern for the right way of going to work” in contrast to the slipshod efforts of the Company. The Belgian colonialist enterprise in Africa not only takes its toll on the communal stability of the Europeans, it even more profoundly uproots and destabilizes the traditional indigenous African cultures. For Marlow, this “detribalized” population is now doubly alienated, a people without any sustaining connection to a larger community, as in his description of the ship’s native fireman: “He was an improved specimen; he could fire up a vertical boiler.╯.╯.╯. He ought to have been clapping his hands and stamping his feet on the bank, instead of which he was hard at work, a thrall to strange witchcraft.” Marlow’s ironic juxtaposition of the fireman’s technical training and primitive thought (“witchcraft”) suggests the colonized subject as a grotesque, a man alienated from both worlds. Yet it is in the figures of Kurtz and his native “adorers” that Conrad most graphically illustrates the “horror” inherent in the disconnection of self and community. Kurtz, the object of Marlow’s journey into the very “heart of darkness,” is, in many ways, the ideal representation of European civilization: educated, intelligent, artistic, idealistic, and hardworking. He is a “gifted creature,” Marlow informs his listeners, no “ordinary man.” In the jungle, however, elevated to a semideity, with no laws or customs to restrain him, Kurtz sits, surrounded by the skulls of his enemies, at the heart of a demonic parody of community combining the worst aspects of European and African cultures. He has provoked and organized the local chiefs into mercenary, even genocidal warfare for the procurement of ivory. Godlike, Kurtz is a law unto himself. “He declared he would shoot me unless I gave him the ivory,” a witness tells Marlow, “.╯.╯. because he could do so, and had a fancy for it, and there was nothing on earth to prevent him killing whom he jolly well pleased.” In Kurtz’s isolation, temptation, and fall; in his final warning, “The horror! The horror!” (75); and in Marlow’s adherence to the ethical codes of the larger community and his narrating the caution-
ary tale to his compatriots, Heart of Darkness vividly demonstrates the community roots of our social identities and values. Michael Zeitler
Isolation in Heart of Darkness
Early in his narration, Marlow tries to put into the minds of his listeners aboard the Nellie some comprehension of the significance Kurtz has come to hold for him. He needs them to understand “how I got out there, what I saw, how I went up that river to the place where I first met the poor chap.” “Do you see him? Do you see the story?” he asks his audience. His urgent questions are not simply rhetorical; this encounter, after all, was no small matter to Marlow but, rather, “the furthest point of navigation and the culminating point of my experience.” In the silence that follows, he answers his own question: “It is impossible. We live as we dream—alone.” Marlow’s anxieties about isolation as the true human condition haunt Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, even as he struggles to communicate this knowledge to others. To be sure, Marlow strikes us from the start as a solitary and isolated figure, one who, like Conrad himself, is always an outsider. In temperament and interests, he is not like other seamen whose “minds are of the stay-at-home order,” the novel’s unnamed narrator observes. Even on the Nellie, among friends, he sits “apart, indistinct, and silent in the pose of a meditating Buddha.” In his own narrative, it is clear that Marlow, although a thoughtful and sensitive observer, never appears at home among other people. In Brussels, he feels as though he is in a “whited sepulcher”; the Company employees uniformly annoy or irritate him, and he feels himself an “imposter.” His passage to Africa is spent in “isolation amongst all these men with whom I had no point of contact.” Avoiding his fellow travelers, he only connects with the sea: “The voice of the surf heard now and then was a positive pleasure, like the speech of a brother. It was something natural, that had its reason, that had a meaning.” On his arrival in the Congo, Marlow’s isolation deepens as he finds himself morally outraged at the laziness, greed, cruelty, and utter indifference to human suffering displayed by his European coworkers. Yet he also fails to make any
300â•…â•… Conrad, Joseph meaningful contact with native Africans, who are rarely granted human status in his narrative and variously referred to as “savages,” “niggers,” “cannibals,” and “rudimentary souls.” Rather than define himself through social interaction, Marlow attempts to create his identity individually, through technological expertise—his work. “I like what is in the work,” he declares, “the chance to find yourself. Your own reality—for yourself, not for others—what no man can ever know.” Upriver, as the familiar dissolves into the darkness of the unknown, a well-used book on seamanship left in an abandoned trading post represents the highest values of civilization, “an honest concern for the right way of going to work.” As Marlow progresses upriver toward Kurtz and the Inner Station, he leaves the familiar signifiers of European civilization and instead finds himself isolated in another way, at the heart of darkness, “cut off from the comprehension of our surroundings.” Kurtz, the object of Marlow’s quest, is himself the novel’s supreme symbol of isolation and its destructive power. Cut off from all societal restraints, Kurtz is free to gratify, without limit, his lusts and passions. Ruling in “utter solitude without a policeman,” he is a law unto himself, with “nothing on earth to prevent him killing whom he jolly well pleased.” Yet Kurtz had been, in many ways, a representative of the best in European civilization: educated, intelligent, idealistic, artistic, and hardworking. His descent into savagery suggests to Marlow how thin the veneer of culture might be and the temptations to which he, himself, is subject in his isolation. In this sense, the quest for Kurtz is also a quest of self-discovery. Ironically, Marlow’s increased self-knowledge only furthers his sense of separation from others. On his return to Europe from Africa, the crowded streets of Brussels, the “sepulchral city,” are filled with people who “trespassed upon my thoughts” and “intruders whose knowledge of life was to me an irritating pretense.” In his alienation, Marlow feels much like a combat veteran reentering civilian life, isolated by his experiences of life on the edge: “[T] he bearing of commonplace individuals going about their business in the assurance of perfect safety was offensive to me like the outrageous flauntings of folly in the face of a danger it is unable to comprehend.”
Although he doubts that such knowledge can be verbally communicated, Marlow’s telling his story in Heart of Darkness is an act of faith. Whether it is a faith in the possibility of human connection or simply a faith in truth telling as a condition of individual meaning by one who detests lies is left ambiguous in the text. Marlow’s last narrative act is to tell how he chose not to tell the truth. In refusing to narrate Kurtz’s story to the “Intended,” he admits, “I could not tell her. It would have been too dark— too dark altogether.” Michael Zeitler
Race in Heart of Darkness
Written largely from his own personal experience and exposing the worst horrors of Europe’s colonial exploitation of Africa at the end of the 19th century, Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness is both a classic novel of liberal social protest and an exploration of the ambiguous and conflicting assumptions about race and culture through which Europeans viewed (and perhaps still view) the world. Because these assumptions simultaneously justify and condemn the colonial experience, the question of race is never far from the moral heart of The Heart of Darkness. Indeed, Marlow’s prefatory remarks on the Nellie, spoken to an audience whose professional lives join in the service of imperial Britain, reveal just such as ambivalence. On the one hand, he cynically admits that “the conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much.” Yet, he continues, what Europe has claimed by force is redeemed “by an idea .╯.╯. an unselfish belief in the idea.” By implication, this redeeming idea—the justification for the theft, the something Europe has that Africa lacks—is not about complexion or noses but about some higher value, whether it is progress, science and technology, ambition, religion, or profit. What Marlow’s narrative revels about the European presence in the Congo is harsh and condemning; what it reveals about European racial assumptions is equally disturbing. Even before his arrival in the Congo, Marlow reacts with cynicism to the homilies justifying Europe’s colonial ventures. When his aunt men-
Lord Jimâ•…â•… 301 tions “weaning those ignorant millions from their horrid ways,” he suggests that “the Company was run for profit.” Nevertheless, Marlow’s first reaction to the Congo goes beyond moral outrage: It is horrified shock. He describes the conditions under which native tribesmen labor to build rail lines and roads necessary for the exporting of ivory and rubber as an “Inferno” of disease and starvation, a place where the native people are considered criminals and enemies, where forced conscripts are whipped and chained together in iron neck collars to carry on the “work” of civilization: “The work was going on. The work! And this was the place where some of the helpers had withdrawn to die.” Describing the operations of the El Dorado Trading Company, he tells his companions that “To tear the treasure out of the bowels of the land was their desire, with no more moral purpose at the back of it than there is in burglars breaking into a safe.” Ironically, the one character whose words claim the highest moral purpose is Kurtz, whose atrocities suggest a connection between the expressed desire for “humanizing, improving, instructing” and his ultimate response to racial difference: “Exterminate all the brutes.” Yet although Marlow sees the native population as victims of European greed, he scarcely sees them as human. In Darwinian terms, Africans are an evolutionary primitive, a “prehistoric man.” “Going up that river,” he informs his listeners, “was like traveling back to the earliest beginnings of the world.” Native people are never humanized; they are always “black shapes crouched” between trees, “black shadows of disease and starvation,” “black figures,” “bundles of acute angles,” “phantoms,” “creatures,” one of whom is described as crawling, animal-like, “on all fours toward the river to drink.” They are referred to by Marlow variously throughout his narrative as “ugly,” “savages,” “niggers,” “cannibals,” “specimens,” and “rudimentary souls.” They have no names, are given no language beyond looks and guttural cries. They are mere background to the intertwined stories of Marlow and Kurtz, stereotyped as savages on the riverbank—“a burst of yells, a whirl of black limbs, a mass of hands clapping, of feet stamping, of bodies swaying, of eyes rolling .╯.╯. a black and incomprehensible frenzy” to whose behavior Europeans can
only react “as sane men would before an enthusiastic outbreak in a madhouse.” Even the one African with whom Marlow significantly interacts, the ship’s fireman, is portrayed in ironic rather than human terms. As a detribalized native in European employment, the fireman is “an improved specimen” and “full of improved knowledge.” Yet his understanding of the ship’s boiler is not knowledge in the Western sense but described as a “thrall to strange witchcraft.” “To look at him,” Marlow says, “was as edifying as seeing a dog in a parody of breeches and a feather hat, walking on hind legs.” But it is the fireman’s death that forces on Marlow a momentary awareness of our common humanity. Although they had worked side by side for months, the paternalistic relationship was never between equals; Marlow describes the fireman as an “instrument” and their “subtle bond” as a partnership. “I had to look after him,” he confesses. Marlow cannot see that an instrument is not a partner; to see a servant is not to acknowledge a fellow human. As the fireman dies, he looks at Marlow with an “intimate profundity .╯.╯. like a claim of a distant kinship affirmed in a supreme moment.” For this moment in the text, Africa looks at Europe and finds it wanting. Michael Zeitler
CONRAD, JOSEPHâ•… Lord Jimâ•… (1900)
Written at around the same time as one of Joseph Conrad’s other masterpieces, Heart of Darkness (1899), Lord Jim was first published in Blackwood’s Magazine from October 1899 to November 1900. In Lord Jim, the narrator, Marlow, tells the story of the life and death of the sailor Jim. Jim is first mate on the Patna, and in a moment of inexplicable bad judgment, abandons the ship, along with the captain and crew. Jim becomes the scapegoat of the group and is stripped of his naval credentials. The novel is divided into two parts, the first narrating Jim’s involvement in the Patna episode and the following humiliating trial, while the second part tells the epic story of Jim’s subsequent success in the exotic settlement Patusan and his tragic death. Lord Jim was generally greeted with admiration when it came out, but while critics have subsequently agreed that the first part of the novel con-
302â•…â•… Conrad, Joseph tains some of Conrad’s best writing, opinions have been divided on the novel’s second part. Some see it as a flawed attempt to round off the complex narrative threads laid out in the first part, while other critics view the two parts as intimately connected. Among the things that make this novel fascinating and intriguing is undoubtedly its mixture of heterogeneous styles—that is, its production of parallel structures, repetitions, and echoing figures, which together form a subtle image of modernity. Despite being one of Conrad’s most autobiographically revealing texts, the novel’s main plot is partly based on the true story of an Englishman (Augustine Podmore Williams) who, like Jim, abandoned a ship carrying pilgrims to Mecca. In Conrad’s fertile imagination, the story of a fate-haunted sailor becomes a potent allegory of heroism and failure in a world on the verge of a new century. Eli Sorensen
Fate in Lord Jim
Fate is a mystifying concept, a nonhuman force that conjures up a series of other concepts, such as chance and fatalism. The latter involves the idea that events, as they unfold in the present, are already decided, whatever one does. Though related to fatalism, the concept of fate is more uncertain. Ultimately, fate is an explanatory category, which retrospectively bestows a particular sequence of events with meaning. Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards, says the philosopher Kierkegaard, and this is one way of understanding the concept of fate. To believe in fate is to be actively involved in shaping one’s fate, which nonetheless remains uncertain until one’s death. If fate is beyond human control in reality, the literary text (as a text that places human lives and events within a given time frame) constitutes a particularly apt medium to portray the dynamics of fate. The eponymous character of Lord Jim is a man who actively attempts to shape his own fate, having identified himself as a hero of the adventure stories he eagerly reads. The sea is where Jim hopes to realize his romantic fate, but the reality turns out to be rather different. In Lord Jim, there is a disjunction between dreams and reality. On the Patna, Jim dreams of heroism, but when an unknown object
hits the Patna and a squall threatens on the horizon (which means almost certain death for everyone staying onboard), Jim pitifully loses control of the situation. As he later insists, he suddenly finds himself in a rescue boat, as if pushed by some demonic force; in reality, it appears that Jim simply fled like a coward, leaving 800 pilgrims to their merciless fate. Thereafter, Jim runs away every time someone reminds him about his humiliating past. Suspended in a void between his failed heroic ideal and the reality of his life, Jim is helplessly unable to take his fate into his own hands. Fascinated by Jim’s paradoxical character—his unwavering faithfulness to an ideal of heroism that blinds him from seeing reality (as well as a deeper understanding of himself )—the narrator, Marlow, pieces together the story of the fate-obsessed sailor’s story from chance meetings, dubious witnesses, and secondhand information, as well as from Jim himself. Marlow creates a complex narrative full of gaps, digressions, and suspensions, and it is ultimately through Marlow that the meaning and shape of Jim’s fate is constructed retrospectively (rather than simply “reconstructed”). While Marlow is the teller of Jim’s story, he also takes an active part in reinstating the disgraced sailor, which may restore Jim’s heroic fate. Through Marlow’s friend Stein, Jim is given a position in the settlement of Patusan, a place having little contact with the outside world (and the memory of the Patna episode). However, the resemblance between the words Patna and Patusan suggests that a fateful repetition of events awaits Jim in this new world; Patusan will also become a place where he fails to live up to his ideal fate. In Patusan, Jim—or “Lord Jim” as he is called by the locals who admire him for his courage and heroism—fulfills his dreams, and yet there is something unreal about this idyllic place. He may have escaped the fate given to him in reality, but the price is the irreconcilability between the exotic (and exoticized) Patusan and the harsh realities of the outside world. In Patusan, Jim may start another life only insofar as knowledge of his past life remains repressed. But with Gentleman Brown’s arrival, Jim is yet again confronted by his repressed past. The irony is that insofar as Jim wants to maintain his heroic and noble identity, he must let Brown go; to kill him (because Brown has guessed Jim’s troubled
Lord Jimâ•…â•… 303 past) would be yet another act of cowardice and self-delusion. And yet, letting Brown go is, of course, ironically the ultimate act of self-delusion in that he convinces himself Brown will leave peacefully. Fate will not allow this to pass unpunished, and Jim dies as a result. A novel about dreams, delusions and the prosaic reality of the modern world, Lord Jim offers an intriguing exploration of the snares and uncertainties of the concept of fate. Eli Park Sorensen
Heroism in Lord Jim
Romantic sea stories of heroism draw Lord Jim’s main character, Jim, toward the sea at an early age. However, during his first meeting with the forces of the sea, Jim is injured. Failing to show his courage and heroism on this occasion, he is given another chance on his next ship, the Patna, which is carrying 800 Muslim pilgrims to Mecca. During the journey, he watches the vast ocean while dreaming of heroism. Suddenly, the Patna is hit by something, and while checking the damage, Jim realizes that the Patna may sink at any minute. Watching the crew struggling to loosen a lifeboat, he is paralyzed. One of the crew members suddenly dies of a heart attack, and after some confusing moments, Jim finds himself in the lifeboat. In the dark night, the other crew members have confused the identities of Jim and the dead officer, and they mock Jim for having stayed on the Patna. The sudden death of the officer seems to create an empty slot which Jim has filled by jumping into the lifeboat, but the slot was not originally meant for him, and in a symbolic sense, Jim, or rather his heroic identity, dies or is suspended in that fateful jump. The Patna does not sink but is saved by another ship. The ship’s crew are guilty of appalling dereliction of duty, and they are summoned by the naval court on charges of cowardice. Only Jim, however, courageously stands up to the charges in court and accepts punishment (being stripped of his officer’s certificate). But his real punishment is the shame of being associated with cowardice. During the trial, Jim meets Captain Marlow, who becomes the narrator of his story. Marlow constructs an image of Jim as a decent young man except for some fundamental, existential flaw of
judgment. Jim dreams of becoming a hero but fails when he gets the chance; subsequently, he insists on acting as a fallen hero, attempting to atone in a tragic-heroic way for his previous errors. Jim acts heroically when he should not and does not when he should have. Besides Jim’s ambiguous identity as a hero, Lord Jim presents other kinds of heroic characters. There is the heroic figure of Captain Brierly, a highly respected and successful officer, who mysteriously commits suicide shortly after Jim has been tried, because of a shameful secret. Another figure is the French lieutenant who helps save the abandoned Patna, but only out of professional duty. Like the lieutenant, the two Malay steersmen similar do what Jim ought to have done—namely, stay onboard the damaged ship, but only because they were told to do so. Heroism in these cases seems to be diminished by a prosaic, contradictory factor. Even more subtly, there is the heroism of the narrator, Marlow, whose altruistic attempt to “rescue” Jim, like a wrecked ship, exposes the gulf between ideals and real life. Marlow eventually persuades the wealthy trader Stein to hire Jim as manager of a place called Patusan, where Jim becomes renowned for his courage and heroism. All is bliss in this unreal, romanticized world until the pirate Gentleman Brown arrives. Jim is aware of Brown’s evil character, but because the latter appeals to Jim’s heroic ideals, Jim lets him go. Before the pirate runs away, however, he kills Dain Waris, the son of a local chief and Jim’s best friend. Burdened with guilt, Jim courageously visits Doramin, Dain Waris’s father, who kills him. It seems as if Jim finally, at this stage, is ready to accept the heroic death for which he had been destined ever since that fateful jump from the Patna. And yet the novel’s ending, as told by Marlow years later, is shrouded in ambiguity: The narrator reflects on the meaning of Jim’s fate and whether he has redeemed himself through his tragic death, but he never quite reaches a conclusion. In the end, inconclusiveness gets the last word in Lord Jim’s heroic exploration of the abyss dividing words from actions, ideals from reality. Eli Sorensen
304â•…â•… Crane, Stephen
Justice in Lord Jim
The notion of “justice” implies a sense of balance in relation to which a perceived “disorder” or “imbalance” is measured. The critic Georg Lukács points out that art is a search for a kind of formal balance in a prosaic world, but he continues that an epic world, on the other hand, “is the perfect theodicy in which crime and punishment lie in the scales of the world justice as equal, mutually homogenous weights.” Lord Jim consists of two largely imbalanced narrative halves, one situated in a troubled, modern world, and one situated within an epic, romantic setting. In each narrative, Jim is the main character facing punishment, having been found guilty of an act of misjudgement (abandoning the Patna; letting Gentleman Brown slip away). During the first half of the novel, we hear the story of Jim’s misfortune aboard the Patna when he fatally misjudges the situation and leaves the ship after it has collided with an unknown object, abandoning 800 Moslem pilgrims to their tragic fate. When the subsequent inquiry disgraces him by declaring him guilty of cowardice, Marlow—the story’s narrator—becomes interested in the “justice” of the process, less because he disagrees with the verdict, and more ambiguously because he identifies Jim as “one of us.” The ambiguity of Marlow’s interest in Jim’s fate tells us something important about the way in which justice represents a problem in the novel. To Marlow, human judgments and laws are always haunted by chance, luck, and imperfection. At one point, he nihilistically muses: “Truth shall prevail.╯.╯.╯. Yes, when it gets a chance. There is a law, no doubt—and likewise a law regulates your luck in the throwing of dice. It is not Justice the servant of men, but accident, hazard, Fortune—the ally of patient Time— that holds an even and scrupulous balance.” On one level, the naval court’s verdict may be fair and just, but it also fails to take into account a deeper aspect of Jim’s character that fascinates Marlow, because it reveals a perversity, a contradiction, hidden within the relationship between the concept of justice and individual judgment—a tension between ideal and action. Jim may be convicted by the court on the basis of his flawed judgment as a sailor aboard the Patna, but his integrity, his sense of justice, remains intact throughout the trial (while
the rest of the crew members, realizing they will not receive a fair hearing, run away). Marlow’s narrative, itself an amalgam of coincidental information, gossip, and rumors, can be seen as an attempt to construct an alternative to the public image of Jim’s character, not so much in order to undermine the court’s verdict but, rather, to explore the complex reasons underneath Jim’s flawed judgment and, hence, do justice to Jim’s character, as “one of us.” On the distant island Patusan, Jim restores his damaged heroic identity. But after his encounter with Gentleman Brown and ill-judged decision to let him go, Jim yet again finds himself facing a verdict, this time fatally when Doramin shoots him. While Jim accepted his verdict by the naval court for failing to live up to his responsibilities as a sailor (as well as his own heroic ideals), this time around he ironically accepts Doramin’s verdict as a consequence of his attempt to live up to his noble ideal as a hero: the price of acting heroically (by letting the crooked pirate go instead of killing him). Lord Jim explores the ambiguities surrounding the concept of “justice” in the modern world. Jim had failed to live up to his heroic ideals when he should have done (on the Patna), and he ends up being killed when he should have taken a more sensible course. Throughout the novel, we are given numerous examples of a disharmonic world, fundamentally out of balance, a world in which Jim’s ideal of heroism clashes and sinks when confronting the random forces of reality. “We want a belief in its necessity and its justice,” Marlow muses, “to make a worthy and conscious sacrifice of our lives. Without it the sacrifice is only forgetfulness, the way of offering is no better than the way to perdition.” Eli Park Sorensen
CRANE, STEPHENâ•… “The Open Boat”â•… (1898)
On the last day of 1896, in Jacksonville, Florida, Stephen Crane (1871–1900) boarded the Commodore for Cuba, part of a filibustering expedition to supply Cuban revolutionaries. Before the ship could get far underway, however, it ran aground, had trouble for two days, and was then sabotaged and began to sink.
“The Open Boat”â•…â•… 305 Crane found himself in a small dinghy with three other men; they were adrift for 30 hours. Crane wrote a newspaper account of this event, but more important, he crafted one of his finest short stories, chronicling the hope and despair of the captain, the cook, the oiler, and the correspondent (the fictional counterpart of Crane himself ). The men struggle valiantly to keep the small boat afloat until they can be rescued, and they vacillate between hope of survival and fear of death throughout the harrowing adventure. The captain is a calm, able leader. The cook provides hope when there is little, and the oiler and the correspondent take turns rowing. The story is told from the point of view of the correspondent, who is initially hopeful of being rescued but finally is so tired and hopeless that death seems almost welcome. The themes of nature’s indifference, the importance of community, and the mystery of survival permeate the story as the men valiantly try to reach shore. Nature is completely indifferent, even threatening in the form of turbulent waves and a predatory shark. Only a sense of community keeps the four men from total despair as they take care of each other, but their survival is threatened over and over. Joyce Smith
Community in “The Open Boat”
When the men in Stephen Crane’s “The Open Boat” find themselves together in a dinghy after their ship has sunk, they have little in common. One man is the ship’s captain; one the cook; one the oiler; and the last a correspondent, or newspaper reporter, who has managed to secure passage on the ship. In spite of not really knowing his new mates, the correspondent soon views them as his community, joining them in looking out for each other and working together. Later, he develops empathy for the larger society that encompasses even a dying soldier in Algiers who is remembered through a poem. This concern for the community of humankind eventually supersedes the correspondent’s earlier question of “why he was there.” The four men work as a team to try to get to safety. The injured captain gives directions and voices assurances that they will get to shore all right, the cook bails water out of the boat, and the oiler
and the correspondent each take an oar to row the craft. Together they use their individual strengths to keep the boat afloat and moving toward safety. The narrator states, “It would be difficult to describe the subtle brotherhood of men that was here established on the seas.” In the cold January landscape, each of the men fell warmed by the companionship of the others, and the correspondent, who has learned to be cynical about men, thinks at the time that it is “the best experience of his life.” The four do not discuss their companionship, but after the correspondent discovers he still has four dry cigars among the eight in the top pocket of his coat, they seal the relationship with a smoking ritual. After someone manages to find three dry matches to light the cigars, each puffs contentedly, assures himself of an impending rescue, and takes a drink of water. When rescue starts to become doubtful, they begin to consider alternatives, and they exchange “addresses and admonitions.” The implication is that even if their little community is broken up by the sea, they will try to contact each other or each other’s families. As night falls, the community becomes more physically entwined. The oiler and the correspondent take turns rowing as they each try to manage some sleep. The feet of the men touch each other as three lie in the boat under the correspondent’s feet, and the cook has his arm around the oiler’s shoulders, evoking an image of “babes of the sea.” This literal touching of bodies is reassuring until the correspondent thinks himself the only one awake. It is then that he sees a shark ominously circling the small boat, and he wishes not to be alone in his fear. The lack of waking companionship seems to reach deeply into the correspondent’s psyche and to dredge up a long-forgotten verse in school. The poem tells of a “soldier of the Legion” dying in Algiers, far from his own country, with only a comrade at his side. The correspondent had long ago forgotten the poem and had never seriously considered the dying soldier’s plight. For the first time, he finds himself greatly concerned for that soldier, feeling sympathy for him. Later when the captain affirms that he too had seen the shark, the correspondent says he wishes he had known someone was awake to share the danger.
306â•…â•… Crane, Stephen The sense of community continues the next day when the captain realizes that they are not likely to be rescued and they must make a try for the shore. He maintains his role as leader, telling the men to jump when the boat swamps and to get clear of the boat so that it does not injure them. As they make their way inland, he continues to give calm directions, calling to the hefty cook to turn over on his back and use the oar to move his body forward and to the correspondent to come to the overturned boat to cling beside him. The shipwrecked men are soon joined by the greater community in the form of a man from shore who strips off his clothing to rescue them. As he begins to pull the correspondent ashore, the man points to the oiler lying face-down in the shallows and asks, “What’s that?” The correspondent tells him, “Go”—but the oiler has not survived. Instead of questioning why he has been placed at risk, the correspondent has learned empathy for his fellow humans through the danger that brought the four men together. Joyce Smith
Nature in “The Open Boat”
Shipwrecked off the Florida coast, the four men in Stephen Crane’s “The Open Boat” must fight against the natural forces of the sea in their attempt to get to shore. At the beginning of the story, nature is completely hostile to the captain, the cook, the oiler, and the correspondent. To these four men in a small dinghy, nature is limited to the treacherous sea and its inhabitants, such as the shark, the gulls, and the seaweed. These elements of nature all seem to conspire to keep the men from safety. After a long and harrowing experience, however, the correspondent comes to a broader view. He learns that nature can be serene, but that it is “flatly indifferent” to the struggles of individuals. Having abandoned their wrecked ship, the men in the small open boat have a limited view of nature: They do not even know the color of the sky because all their efforts are focused on rowing the dinghy, avoiding life-threatening waves, and keeping water out of the craft. The sea itself seems intent on their destruction. The ever-present waves, changing in color from slate gray to emerald green to black,
are characterized as “barbarously abrupt and tall,” “snarling,” “formidable,” and “sinister” as they bombard the boat and intimidate the men. Not only is the sea itself threatening, but so is the shark that swishes around the boat like a “blue flame,” a “monstrous knife,” or a “gigantic and keen projectile,” cutting through the waters while three of the men attempt to sleep. The correspondent feels completely alone as the other men seem to be sleeping; only later does he learn that the captain, too, was awake and aware of the shark. The correspondent states that he wishes he had known the captain was awake, indicating that company might have allayed some of his fear. Less threatening but perhaps more irritating are the Canton flannel gulls, who in their comfort present a stark contrast to the men. The gulls sit effortlessly on the sea, while the men have difficulty even changing positions in their small vessel. The only comfort for the men is the “sea-water couch in the bottom of the boat,” which is miserable in the January cold. Occasionally a gull nears the boat, at one point threatening to sit on the captain’s head and inspiring anger and resentment from the men. Not only the animals but the plants seem hostile to the shipwrecked men in their desolation, as the “islands” of seaweed seem to mock them in their enforced separation from the land. Crane uses active verbs for the elements of nature, as it exhibits more power than the men can. Eventually the men’s viewpoint includes the land, which begins to “loom” on the horizon and to “grow” in size as the boat gets nearer to the shore. The men see the yellow tone of the sky, but the land soon vanishes, and the correspondent wishes to strike back when he learns that “nature does not regard him as important.” When dawn arrives, the correspondent then notes the “carmine and gold .╯.╯. painted upon the waters,” and he comes to a new understanding that nature is indifferent—not cruel, but “flatly indifferent.” As the boat capsizes and the four men struggle to reach shore, even drowning seems to offer a comfortable alternative, and a wave throws the correspondent over the boat, not against it, in a “true miracle of the sea.” Instead of being smashed against the vessel, he is able to make his way safely to shore.
“The Open Boat”â•…â•… 307 Although the oiler, who seems the most physically fit of the crew, is unfortunately drowned, the other three men reach shore, with the land’s welcome “warm and generous.” The oiler is left to the “sinister hospitality of the grave.” The survivors, however, are left to be interpreters of “the great sea’s voice.” As an interpreter, the correspondent can now say more than he felt nature had said to him earlier when he was contemplating being drowned: “A high cold star on a winter’s night is the word he feels that she says to him.” The high, cold star had given him little comfort, and the oiler’s death had seemed to confirm nature’s hostility, but the miracle of the wave’s catapulting him over the upturned boat presents the other side of nature, the miraculous occurrence of his life having been spared. It is the story of “The Open Boat” that the correspondent can pass on to others who may see only one side of nature. Joyce Smith
Survival in “The Open Boat”
As Stephen Crane remarks, “Shipwrecks are apropos of nothing.” In other words, one does not prepare for such a happening because one never expects it. With their very survival dependent on their physical ability, the four men in the open boat are soon at their weakest. For two days before the wreck, none of them has either slept or eaten much; the cook is out of shape and overweight, and the captain has been injured. Only the correspondent and the oiler can row, and they have become increasingly weary. The waves work continuously against the small boat, whose seats are “not unlike a seat upon a bucking broncho.” When it becomes necessary to trade places so that the correspondent can spell the oiler at rowing, the exchange itself is precarious: “[I]t is easier to steal eggs from under a hen than it was to change seats in the dingey.” As soon as one wave is successfully traversed, another takes its place, and the closer the men get to land, the more severe the pounding of the breaking waves and the greater the possibility of the boat being swamped. The only hope for survival, then, seems to be rescue from shore, from someone who can send out a larger boat to get them. They work to keep hope alive as the cook remembers a “house of refuge just north of the Mosquito Inlet.” After they discuss the
fact that such houses do not have staff, only supplies, the cook decides that perhaps it is not a house of refuge. Ethics will not allow “any open suggestion of hopelessness. So they were silent.” Their survival is an issue that does not allow negativity. The captain continues to reassure the men, calmly coaching them to save their strength and to keep their hope alive. When a lighthouse looms on the horizon, the men become quietly cheerful, but their hope dims when no signs of life are visible at the structure, and the lighthouse itself is described as “slim” and “little.” The loss of hope is punctuated by the mournful line “Funny they don’t see us,” spoken three different times as any lightheartedness completely vanishes. Physical pain and discomfort finally reaches a point where the correspondent welcomes the idea of death as a relief: “It is almost certain that if the boat had capsized he would have tumbled comfortably out upon the ocean as if he felt sure that it was a great soft mattress.” But when death seems most inviting, they spot a man on the shore, and they improvise a flag to wave at him. The man then waves his coat in meaningless gyrations interpreted by the men to indicate that help is on its way. It soon becomes apparent, however, that he is just part of a group boarding an omnibus after a beach outing. When hope of survival is at its lowest point, the correspondent gives way to despair: “If I am going to be drowned—if I am going to be drowned—if I am going to be drowned, why, in the name of the seven mad gods who rule the sea, was I allowed to come thus far and contemplate sand and trees?” The shark encircling the boat heightens the threat to survival. Again the correspondent asks himself why he has been allowed to see sand and trees if he is to be drowned anyway. Later, when the men decide no help is coming, the correspondent intellectualizes the possibility of not surviving, and he simply wishes that death not be painful. He is so tired that he merely thinks it would be a shame to drown. He considers his own mortality and considers that “his own death [might] be the final phenomenon of nature.” The great mystery of survival then plays itself out as the men must abandon the boat and struggle to keep it from hitting them. The injured captain uses
308â•…â•… Crane, Stephen the overturned dinghy as a float, but the boat, caught by a strong wave, soon batters the correspondent. Despite tremendous odds, the captain, the cook, and the young correspondent make it safely to shore. But the oiler, the physically strongest of the crew, the one most capable of swimming the distance, is found in the shallows, face downward. Those allowed to live, according to the correspondent, can “then be interpreters.” The implication is that they can interpret the mystery of survival. But the text itself suggests that no such interpretation is possible since the one who had seemed most capable of survival is the one who has died. Joyce Smith
CRANE, STEPHENâ•… The Red Badge of Courageâ•… (1895)
In 1895, some three decades after the end of the American Civil War, Stephen Crane published The Red Badge of Courage, a novel set during that war, with the specific battle probably the Battle of Chancellorsville, although the locale is never named. The novel follows young Henry Fleming into the Union Army and through the battle. The youth must confront the reality of war as opposed to the romantic notions he has gained through reading heroic epics. Henry soon finds war anything but romantic. At first it is downright boring, with absolutely nothing happening and with the young recruits eager for action. When that action finally comes, Henry is afraid that he will be a coward. He encounters other young recruits, the tall soldier and the loud soldier, who also do not know what to expect. Jim Conklin, the tall soldier, seems self-assured and eager to fight, and the loud soldier gives Henry a packet of letters to be sent to his mother in the event of his death. All three are uncertain about the nature of battle. Eventually Henry does incur a wound, his own red badge of courage, but that badge is ironic, for he has not earned it for bravery. Major themes include Henry’s coming of age, his questions about heroism and cowardice, and the role of religion in the process. Although the novel’s action takes place in only a few days, Henry learns much about himself. The book ends, however, with
doubt that he has yet firmly grasped the concept of heroism. Joyce Smith
Coming of Age in The Red Badge of Courage
At the beginning of The Red Badge of Courage, Stephen Crane refers to Henry Fleming most often as “the youth,” reminding us of his immaturity. Henry, a schoolboy, has signed up with the military because he has visions of greatness, and his motive is not to fight for an important cause but to achieve fame. Dressed in his newly issued uniform, he goes to his school to show it off, and he revels in the applause given the troops as they move from train station to train station. He is disappointed that his mother says nothing of “returning with his shield or on it,” the admonition given to warriors in the Greek heroic literature he has read in school. Henry has no idea of what real war is like, but he quickly learns that boredom is a large part of each day. Instead of the glory he had expected, he finds the tedium of waiting. He is eager to prove his manhood: “The youth had been taught that a man became another thing in a battle.” When his first battle ends, he is ecstatic that he has passed the test of masculine maturity: “So it was all over at last! The supreme trial had been passed.” What the stillimmature youth does not realize is that during this battle, he has simply reacted in the same way those around him have reacted; he has been, in effect, a part of a vast machine moving mechanically. In the next battle, the second, when those around him are running, he retreats as well. Henry’s only apparent gain in maturity comes in the third battle, after he has overheard an officer telling the general that his unit is expendable: “They fight like a lot ’a mule drivers. I can spare them best of any.” When the general replies that he does not believe many of the men will survive, the youth feels that “he had been made aged.” In spite of the fact that the leaders believe he will be killed, this time Henry goes forward bravely, eager to prove that he is not a coward. Both he and his friend Wilson exhibit their courage, Henry by carrying the flag and Wilson by charging ahead with him. At the end of the battle, their pride is evident: “And they were men.”
The Red Badge of Courageâ•…â•… 309 The two youths then face two responses to their actions in this battle, the first negative and the next positive. The general is overheard telling the lieutenant that the unit did not go far enough, quickly deflating the pride that both Henry and his friend Wilson are feeling. Not too much later, however, one of the other young soldiers reports hearing the general specifically single out the heroic actions of these two in carrying the war emblem and leading the group. Their pride again swells. The events of this book take place over a few days, and at the end Henry Fleming thinks himself a man. He replays all his feats in his head, dwelling on those that make him heroic and “viewing the gilded images of memory.” He reaches the conclusion that he has come of age: “He had been to touch the great death, and found that, after all, it was but the great death. He was a man.” Some critics argue that this youth truly grew into manhood during the few battles, and others argue that at the end of the book he is still immature, that he is only building his heroism in his mind and is still guided by the opinions of others. While Henry has experienced war and he bursts with pride at the reports of his courage under fire, he pushes aside the nagging thoughts of his earlier cowardice as he basks in his accomplishments. The question of Henry’s maturity hinges not so much on how he has performed in this battle as how he will perform in the next and the next and how he will treat his fellow soldiers who need his help. He had deemed Jim Conklin heroic from the beginning, and he wondered about Wilson, who gave him a letter to send home if he did not survive. What Henry does not understand is that all the young soldiers were probably as unsure as he himself had been. Although he now seems secure in his own idea of manhood, Henry may simply be using the same immature reasoning that he has displayed all along, since he still judges himself more by what is said of him by others than by what he thinks himself. A truly mature soldier, a real man, would probably be concerned with more important issues, such as the cause for which he is fighting and the well-being of his fellow soldiers. Joyce Smith
Heroism in The Red Badge of Courage
When Stephen Crane wrote The Red Badge of Courage, he had never experienced war. Today, however, veterans of war testify to the truth of the novel’s psychological realism. The reason, perhaps, is the struggle any soldier must face when he is thrust into battle: He must confront his own fear. Henry Fleming, the protagonist, does just that, but his fear is complicated, a question of which he fears most: dying or being judged a coward. Henry’s ideas of war are based on reading classics about Greek and Roman battles or hearing stories from current veterans, sources that seem to have emphasized heroism. Even as he is leaving home, Henry is disappointed that his mother says “nothing whatever about returning with his shield or on it.” Her more practical advice of always doing what is right is soon forgotten, and the regimental members on the train to Washington are hailed as heroes: “The regiment was fed and caressed at station after station until the youth had believed that he must be a hero.” When the young recruits hear rumor after rumor of impending battle, Henry longs to prove himself even as he tries to quiet his own doubts about his courage: “He tried to mathematically prove to himself that he would not run from a battle.” Once in battle, he functions merely as a member of the group. In the crush of humanity, he sees that flight is not possible, and he congratulates himself on fighting bravely. He believes that he has passed a “supreme trial” and that any “difficulties of war had been vanquished.” This glamour of war and heroism is soon undercut, however, by the grisly sight in the woods of a corpse with unseeing eyes staring at him as ants run over the dead man’s head. Shortly afterward comes the dramatic death of the tall soldier, Jim Conklin, who had seemed the calmest, most heroic of the young recruits. Soon Henry despairs of ever being heroic himself: “He now conceded it to be impossible that he should ever become a hero.” Then, as others are frantically retreating, Henry joins the flight. A wounded “tattered soldier” tries to help him, but Henry angrily refuses aid, afraid of being found out as a coward. As he flees from the wounded soldier
310â•…â•… Crane, Stephen and joins another stream of fleeing men, he is hit on the head by a fellow soldier’s rifle. He stumbles on, struggling to deal with his cowardice, and a “cheery soldier” leads him back to his regiment. There his friend, the “loud soldier,” ministers to him, thinking that Henry has been shot in battle and admiring his bloody wound as a badge of courage: “Yer a good un, Henry. Most’ a men would a’ been in th’ hospital long ago. A shot in th’ head ain’t foolin’ business.” Henry, of course, knows that he is not a hero, but he does not reveal how he actually received the wound. As he is lauded, he soon begins to feel capable of great valor, though his conscience is bothered by the memory of the tattered soldier who had helped both him and the dying tall soldier. Later, Henry and his friend overhear the general and another officer plan to send the 304th, their regiment, into a battle they feel is not winnable: “They fight like a lot ’a mule-drivers. I can spare them best of any.” Resenting this lack of confidence in their ability, the two young men fight valiantly, seizing the regimental flag from a dead soldier and keeping it high to spur the group on in battle. When they hear the colonel and the lieutenant complimenting them, the two youths are jubilant, forgetting all the previous pain and disillusionment. The book ends on that note, and the question of heroism is never solved. Was Henry a hero in the last battle? Was he a coward for running earlier? Is the position of hero dependent on what others think? Henry feels that “at last he was enabled to more closely comprehend himself and circumstance,” but he does not acknowledge that even greater threats may loom. The implication is that Henry has grown through these few days of battle; the irony is that he has been tried only briefly and that he still does not know what he will do in the next battle. He has fought valiantly to prove that he is not expendable, but he will undoubtedly face even more dangerous situations later. His thoughts of heroism are still punctuated by shameful feelings about deceiving the tattered man, one who did what is right, much as Henry’s mother had advised him to do. Joyce Smith
Religion in The Red Badge of Courage
Although there is no overt religion in The Red Badge of Courage, critics have debated Stephen Crane’s use of religious imagery in the novel. The son of a Methodist minister and a mother who worked vigorously for the church and the temperance movement, Crane rebelled against the rules and regulations that his parents advocated. He was, however, quite familiar with the Bible and he often used religious allusions in his writing. In this novel, he not only includes such references, he also incorporates other images that have been construed to refer to religion or religious rites. Soon after Henry has fled from his second battle, he tries to justify his action by equating it with the laws of nature. He looks to the landscape for assurance, and he finds a “fair field holding life.” That field represents for him the opposite of what he has witnessed in battle: “It was the religion of peace.” He tests his theory of nature by throwing a pine cone at a squirrel, which runs from such assault much as Henry and the other men had run from battle. Henry seems to feel a moral, perhaps religious, justification for his retreat from battle, supported by the laws of nature itself. Leaving this peaceful field, Henry soon encounters what appears to be a natural chapel, formed by arching boughs of the trees and having “a religious half light.” As he contemplates nature’s tranquility, his peace turns to horror on encountering a soldier’s corpse propped against a tree. The corpse’s staring eyes and open mouth are accompanied by ants moving along its upper lip. What began as religious peace, or the peace of nature, becomes just the opposite for the young recruit. The most controversial of the images that may or may not be religious is that of the sun in the last sentence of chapter 9: “The red sun was pasted in the sky like a wafer.” Some critics have equated this wafer with a communion wafer, symbolically covered with the red of communion wine and representing the body and blood of Christ’s sacrifice. These same critics point out that Jim Conklin has sacrificed himself in battle, that his initials echo those of Jesus Christ, and that his moral stance has been superior to that of Henry, who has succumbed to cowardice
The Divine Comedyâ•…â•… 311 and, more important, has abandoned the “tattered man,” whom he should have helped. Although other images reinforce the possibility that Conklin is a Christ figure, with his movements called “ritelike,” Crane undercuts this possibility by declaring that “there was a resemblance in him to a devotee of a mad religion, blood-sucking, musclewrenching, bone-crushing.” Crane’s ironic stance indicates that perhaps Henry and the other troops have elevated this levelheaded but doomed young soldier to the status of a deity, but that he, too, has fallen in battle. Jim, the leader of his small group from the beginning of the story, is after all only mortal, his quiet authority stilled forever. During the course of the book, Henry goes from victory to defeat to victory again in his various battles, and at the end he seems to have overcome his fear of failure. He cannot, however, dispel the nagging of his conscience over his abandonment of the tattered soldier. Henry knows that he should have stayed with the badly wounded man, who would almost surely die without help. At that point, however, Henry was too concerned with himself, with the fear that he would reveal his cowardice to the tattered man, so he had hurried away from him. Henry now sees this abandonment as a “sin,” and at the end of the last chapter, he is still trying to deal with his action: “Yet gradually he mustered force to put the sin at a distance.” The young recruit must come to terms with a moral precept that his mother had given him when he left for the war: to do what is right. What is right for Henry is to treat others as he would want to be treated, and he finally sees that cowardice is not nearly as important as brotherly love, an important component of most religions. Joyce Smith
DANTE ALIGHIERIâ•… The Divine Comedyâ•… (1308–1321)
The Divine Comedy is one of the best-known works in all of literary history. Penned by Dante Alighieri sometime between 1308 and his death in 1321, it is an intricately detailed and beautifully crafted 14,000-line epic poem considered the masterpiece of Italian literature. The poem is written in terza rima, or three-line stanzas with a particular rhym-
ing pattern, and is divided into three books of 33 cantos each. Written in the first person, it tells of Dante’s journey through the Christian afterlife: hell in Inferno, purgatory in Purgatorio, and heaven in Paradiso. The Divine Comedy is a complex allegory about life, religion, and love—both the love of a human woman and the love of God. The work is filled with historical, biblical, and literary references, and it is rife with symbolic language, leaving it open to a wide variety of interpretations. The poem both asks and answers questions about the justice of God and the nature of man by making parallels between the spiritual world and the natural world. Not much is known about Dante’s background and education, but one of the most important events of his life is documented in his work La Vita Nuova—his encounter with Beatrice Portinari. Dante writes that he first saw her when she was eight and he was nine, and then again when he was 18. She was deeply devoted to God, and her love of religion is actually what influenced Dante to become a Christian. Beatrice died suddenly at the young age of 24, leaving Dante heartbroken. She would become to him a mix of a human woman and a perfect fantasy, idolized within the pages of history forever through The Divine Comedy. In 1302, Dante was exiled from Florence for supporting an anti-papal regime. The Divine Comedy is a result of his sorrow for losing the only woman he cared about and for being forbidden to return to the city he loved, and his anger with the politics of the time. The poem, which has been translated numerous times, is a classic tale of passion, sacrifice, religious devotion, and spiritual discovery. It has been quoted and studied by students and scholars around the globe, and it will certainly continue to be examined and appreciated in the years to come. After six centuries, The Divine Comedy is still a brilliant work that represents the core of every human experience: the search for love and spiritual understanding. Sara Tomedi
Justice in The Divine Comedy
When Dante had his first glimpse of Beatrice, she was young and radiant. Kneeling in her garden, luminescent with sunshine and the adoration of prayer, she could easily have been mistaken for a
312â•…â•… Dante Alighieri saint. Her beauty and devotion to God brought Dante to religion and developed in him an almost unshakable faith. However, human life is full of both incredible joys and deep sorrows. Beatrice died suddenly, still in mid-bloom, taken from the world and from Dante just as she was entering adulthood. Dante, like every other human being who has experienced loss, must have questioned the justice of God. It is the question of why bad things happen to good people that allows most human beings to wonder about the nature of God. Clearly, there is no ultimate justice on earth; the only hope of mere humans is the possibility of finding recompense in the afterlife. Nevertheless, while the average person must rely on faith, Dante is fortunate enough to experience the truth firsthand on his arduous journey to discover God. He does not have to travel far. The question of God’s justice is answered almost immediately in Inferno, with Dante’s descent into hell. Though it is more fully expanded in the rest of The Divine Comedy, the idea of justice is most prevalent in Inferno. Not only is Dante’s God a just God, but the afterlife is a finite and perfectly balanced system of punishments and rewards. Before he enters hell, Dante pauses to read the inscription carved into the gate which bars all of the immoral souls in hell from escaping: “SACRED JUSTICE MOVED MY ARCHITECT. / I WAS RAISED HERE BY DIVINE OMNIPOTENCE, / PRIMORDIAL LOVE AND ULTIMATE INTELLECT” (3.4–6). Truly the “sacred justice” of God is apparent in every aspect of the punishments in hell. The sinners who were gluttons in life, devouring anything they could without regard to themselves or others, are left to wallow waist-deep in garbage and putrid “slush,” probably their own feces (6.38). In the fifth Circle of Hell, the wrathful—who always violently expressed their anger in life—beat, harass, and attempt to rip each other apart in hell, while nearby, the sullen, who stifled their anger in life, sink miserably and silently into a swamp (7.1–30). Though Inferno is the most vivid representation of God’s justice because Dante goes into great detail about horrific punishments, other instances of God’s justice are found throughout The Divine Comedy. The same sins from hell return again in purgatory
because Dante’s God is fair enough to recognize that, though many men may be convicted of the same crime, some do it more often or more intensely than others. For example, the Hoarders and Wasters in hell are forced to move great boulders back and forth on the edge of a precipice while spewing curses at each other. However, in Purgatorio, the hoarders and wasters are bound hand and foot and forced to be stationary, face down in the dirt. Dante finds that all of the sinners in hell and in purgatory are well aware of their sins and their fitting punishments, so he asks one of the damned why he is prostrate, to which he replies: “We would not raise our eyes to the shining spheres / but kept them turned to mundane things: so Justice / bends them to earth here in this place of tears” (19.121–123). Because they spent their lives focused on material objects that crumble to dust, instead of God, they are forced to spend their afterlives focused on dust. It is within Purgatorio that Dante, having thus far seen only the punishments of God, begins to see the just rewards of heaven. In canto 30, he is reunited with his love, Beatrice, who becomes his guide for his journey through heaven just as she was his guide to a religious life on earth. Together with Beatrice, Dante confesses his sins and is washed clean in the river Lethe in order to continue, sinless, to Heaven. In Paradiso, Dante encounters levels of believers and worshippers of God just as he met levels of sinners in hell. From members of the church who kept their vows, to saints, to angels, to the Virgin Mary herself, every aspect of heaven is addressed according to God’s divine justice. Dante eventually comes to God himself, although the revelation disappears from his memory when he returns to humanity. Fortunately, the memory of Beatrice and the power and justice of the Almighty remain with him and cause him to begin writing the experiences that will become The Divine Comedy. It is through the fairness of God that Dante is permitted to return to earth and write a work that will possibly save others from future sins and punishments. Sara Tomedi
Love in The Divine Comedy
In The Divine Comedy, love is not just a theme, it is the basis for the entire work. For Dante, God and
The Divine Comedyâ•…â•… 313 love are inseparable, and every human action can be categorized as performed either out of love or out of a lack of love: “Thus you may understand that love alone / is the true seed of every merit in you, / and all acts for which you must atone” (Purgatorio 17.103–105). Dante’s journey through the afterlife begins in hell with his guide, the poet Virgil. Together, they travel from level to level until they ultimately reach the core of hell, where Satan resides. The sinners in hell have been completely deprived of God, so there is little mention of love there. One of the only instances is in canto 5, when Dante comes to the Carnal, those who have followed their animal instincts instead of reason and religion. There he meets Paolo and Francesca Maletesta, and he swoons with compassion when he hears their story. In 1275, Francesca came to Rimini to make a political marriage with Giovanni Malatesta, but she fell in love with her new brother-in-law, Paolo, instead. When Giovanni caught them both in the act, he killed them. Their situation raises questions about the lines between love and sin because, unfortunately, their punishment is to be bound together forever in hell. The idea may sound romantic, but it is not. Rather, seeing each other is a constant reminder of their sin and an added punishment or, as Francesca says, “The double grief of a lost bliss / is to recall that happy hour in pain” (Inferno 5.118–120). As Dante rises through hell into purgatory, heading toward the earthly paradise, he finds that purgatory is composed of different levels of infractions involving love. There is the inappropriate love that leads to self-love, covetousness, or anger with the proud, the envious, and the wrathful. Then there are the slothful, who are guilty of loving too little, followed by the immoderate love of the avaricious and the gluttons, who loved objects such as money and food more than God. The group at the very top of purgatory, closest to heaven, are the lustful. Although their sin is an immoderate love, it is an excessive love of other humans and is therefore closest to what is asked of us by God, because “the soul, being created prone to Love, / is drawn at once to all that pleases it, / as soon as pleasure summons it to move” (Purgatorio 18.19–21).
When Dante reaches the banks of the river Lethe, he comes to the end of his time with Virgil, who is bound to hell and cannot continue to paradise. The most important symbol of divine love in the entire Comedy, Beatrice, enters at this moment. For Dante, second only to his love of God is his love of Beatrice, the girl with whom he was smitten before she died at a young age. Through Beatrice’s “power and excellence alone / [Dante] recognized the goodness and grace” of God (Paradiso 31.82–83). Beatrice descended into hell for her concern and love of Dante in the same way that Jesus did for Christians, and through the character of Beatrice, Dante shows that the love between humans is directly proportional to the love between humans and God. Beatrice is also often compared to the church because, at times, she loves Dante in the way that a mother loves a child with a “mother’s sternness,” and the church is considered the mother of all Christians, guiding them to God (Purgatorio 30.80). Dante enters paradise with the aid of Beatrice and realizes that heaven itself, because it houses God, is “the infinite and inexpressible Grace” which “gives itself to Love / as a sunbeam gives itself to a bright surface” (Purgatorio 15.67–69). Beatrice explains to him that, since he is cleansed and has seen God, “should some other thing seduce [his] love,” it is not because Dante desires to sin, but because he sees the light of God in other things and is drawn to them (Paradiso 5.10). He is no longer capable of experiencing any corrupt forms of love. Finally, Dante meets the “hosts”—the angels and the blessed beings—and experiences the “Light of the intellect, which is love unending” when he confronts the ultimate love of God (Paradiso 30.40). Sara Tomedi
Nature in The Divine Comedy
The Divine Comedy is a work absolutely overflowing with symbols and motifs, but in the midst of this attentively detailed poem, one theme is far more prevalent than the others—Dante’s use of nature. Nature is the setting of the poem itself, which becomes more alive and beautiful as Dante moves from the harsh rocks and boulders of hell to the lush greenery of heaven. In the poem, nature symbolizes human life and the way in which people
314â•…â•… Davies, Robertson can advance their connection with God through religious growth. Dante also constantly uses nature in a descriptive way to show the physical splendor of those who are close to God on the spiritual level. In The Inferno, Dante begins his discovery of the afterlife by saying, “Midway in our life’s journey, I went astray / from the straight road and woke to find myself / alone in a dark wood” (1.1–3). His remark is the first use of nature as a symbol for the soul of humanity. The “dark wood” is a place away from the love of God. Dante’s soul is lost in the trap of worldly desires, and so, in order to find his way out of the woods and into the light, he must begin his quest. Just as there are good and bad people, nature, too, represents both aspects. Though the woods represent the world and its evils, the sun is almost always representative of God, holiness, and divine revelation. The setting of The Divine Comedy grows steadily more stunning as Dante rises toward heaven, as can be seen by following one canto through each of the three books. For example, in canto 3 of Inferno, Dante is in the vestibule of hell with the opportunists. It is a place filled with screams, chaos, filthy air, and “a swarm of wasps and hornets” (3.62). In canto 3 of Purgatorio Dante finds himself at the base of what seems to be an ever-rising cliff. As the “red blaze” of sun begins to rise behind him, the land is not as treacherous as hell, but it has an ominous feeling about it (3.16). Finally, canto 3 of the Paradiso finds Dante on the shiny and incredibly beautiful moon “as dense and smoothly polished as a diamond” (2.32). Nature is also a symbol for God himself, and sinning against God is equivalent to sinning against nature. In canto 11 of Inferno, Dante meets the circle of the heretics, and Virgil proves that almost every sin can be linked back to a sin against nature, even usury: “Near the beginning of Genesis, you will see / that in the will of Providence, man was meant / to labor and to prosper. But usurers, / by seeking their increase in other ways, / scorn Nature in herself and her followers” (11.107–111). It is the job of the descendants of Adam to replenish the earth and to be imitations of God. People who find pleasure in reaping money alone, and not soil, are sinning by producing nothing. They are not produc-
ing art, which is the child of nature, nor are they aiding nature, which is the child of God because, as Virgil states, “All of Nature,—her laws, her fruits, her seasons,—/ springs from the Ultimate Intellect and Its Art” (11.99–100). Man was born to take care of nature, and if he does not do that to some extent, like “any seed / out of its proper climate .╯.╯. he will not flourish” (Paradiso 8.139–141). In fact, man is meant to “heed the plan / of nature’s firm foundation” (Paradiso, 8.142–143). This does not mean that every man is meant to be a farmer by occupation, but that every man’s soul has a calling as given to him by God, and he should follow it in order to be content. Just as he uses them to represent God, Dante uses nature metaphors to render images of the magnificent members of heaven. For example, the Angelic Host appear to him “like living flame their faces seemed to glow. / Their wings were gold.╯.╯.╯. more dazzling white than any earthly snow” (Paradiso 31.13–15). This idea is best exemplified in Beatrice, whom Dante actually describes as being something even more beautiful than nature: “If nature or art ever contrived a lure / to catch the eye and thus possess the mind .╯.╯. all charms united could not move a pace / toward the divine delight with which I glowed / when I looked once more on her smiling face” (Purgatorio, 27.91–96). Dante uses nature imagery almost exclusively in heaven, proving that he believed there is no other aspect of life on earth that can better represent the spiritual life than nature. Sara Tomedi
DAVIES, ROBERTSONâ•… Fifth Businessâ•… (1970)
Fifth Business is a 1970 novel by the Canadian novelist Robertson Davies (1913–95) and the first installment of the Deptford trilogy, which traces the lives of three characters from the small town of Deptford, Ontario, who are bound to each other inextricably by a tragic event in their childhood. “Fifth business” is a term for an opera character who is essential to the plot and yet is neither hero nor villain. It applies to Dunstan Ramsay, the narrator, who dedicates his life to caring for the victims of the pivotal snowball incident that opens the book,
Fifth Businessâ•…â•… 315 even though he was the intended victim, not the one who threw the snowball. Ramsay becomes a schoolteacher and also an expert on hagiology (the study of saints), publishing 10 books in this area. It is through his work on saints and his friendship with a female con artist that he finally comes to an understanding of his own nature. The novel’s form is a letter, written by Ramsay after he retires, that serves as his autobiography. In it, he tells his own story and those of Mary Dempster, the woman who was injured by the snowball; her son, to whom she gave premature birth because of the injury; and Percy Staunton, the town bully who threw the snowball and becomes one of the most wealthy and influential men in Canada. Fifth Business is 40th on the American Modern Library list of the 20th century’s 100 best novels. It is Davies’s best-known novel. Susan R. Bowers
Guilt in Fifth Business
Guilt shapes the entire life of Dunstan Ramsay. He is plagued by it from the moment the snowball aimed at him by the town bully instead hits the pregnant Mary Dempster, precipitating the premature birth of her son and her descent into mental illness. Dunstan blames himself because he had dodged in front of Mrs. Dempster and her husband to escape being hit himself. No one else knows who threw the snowball, which had a rock, which Dunstan uses as a paperweight throughout his life, inside. The bully, Percy Staunton, refuses to acknowledge culpability and threatens Dunstan with dire consequences if he tells. Thus, Dunstan at age 10 is left alone with his guilt to conjure horrific images of being tortured in hell as one of the damned. He believes so fervently that some dreadful fate will overtake him if his role in the incident should become known that the truth does not surface for 50 years. Dunstan’s efforts to expiate his guilt by helping the Dempsters invite mockery from his peers and isolate him from his own world. When he teaches magic to Paul, the Dempster child, Paul’s Baptist minister father banishes him from their home. But when Mrs. Dempster’s habit of wandering culminates in her disappearance, Dunstan is with the
search party who find her in the town gravel pit, having sex with a hobo because, she says, “He was very civil” and “wanted it so badly.” Her act so horrifies the townsfolk that Dunstan’s mother forbids him from ever seeing Mrs. Dempster. The Reverend Dempster ties his wife with a rope to keep her from wandering away. Dunstan secretly visits, however, and comes to see their relationship as “the tap root that fed [his] life.” Dunstan’s obsession with Mrs. Dempster never ceases: he ultimately takes over her care (her husband has long since abandoned her) and visits her every week after he becomes a teacher in a private boys’ school. He also maintains a relationship with Percy “Boy” Staunton, who makes a fortune in sugar and rises to prominence in Canadian politics. But Dunstan’s guilt is refreshed periodically. He feels new guilt, for instance, when Paul runs away at an early age to join a traveling circus as a magician since Dunstan had initiated Paul’s fascination with magic. Fifty years later, he convinces himself that something he has told Mrs. Dempster leads to her death. Even after she is dead, the guilt continues: He begs God’s forgiveness because “I had not been loving enough, or wise enough, or generous enough in my dealings with her.” Guilt causes Dunstan to live a life on the sidelines, although he teaches for 45 years and writes 10 books. His isolation is occasioned partly by the secrecy that guilt fosters, as well as by the time and energy required to take care of Mrs. Dempster. The psychological damage is so significant that he cannot engage fully in relationships until forced as a 60-year-old man to confess his guilty secret. Thus, Fifth Business raises important questions about Dunstan’s guilt as well as guilt in general. Most important is the question of whether Dunstan should have felt guilt at all. After all, it is instinctual to get out of the way of danger; moreover, a 10-yearold boy could not have foreseen that he would put someone else in harm’s way. Finally, a simple snowball is not usually deadly; Dunstan could not have known that Percy had packed the snow around a piece of granite. Another question is whether the town’s repressive atmosphere concerning sexual matters, including childbirth, combined with young
316â•…â•… Davies, Robertson Dunstan’s natural curiosity about sex, contributed to his guilt. Other issues stem from how the other parties reacted. Percy Staunton never acknowledges guilt, although we learn that he feels a spiritual emptiness in later life, despite his financial, political, and personal success. Late in the novel, Paul, known in later life as the famous magician Magnus Eisengrim, tells Dunstan that his father had tried to make him feel guilty because it had been his birth that had robbed his mother of her sanity. But, he says, “I was too young for the kind of guilt my father wanted me to feel; he had an extraordinary belief in guilt as an educative force.” Paul’s statement so near the end of Fifth Business forces us to question seriously whether guilt is indeed an educative force. It obviously did not teach Dunstan anything about himself or others but functioned instead as an obstacle to his living a full life. In fact, as we have seen, Dunstan’s guilt probably was unnecessary in the first place. Susan Bowers
Responsibility in Fifth Business
A snowball encasing granite, a pregnant woman, a 10-year-old boy, and a village dedicated to repressing emotion make up the recipe for personal disaster in Fifth Business. The snowball is thrown by the town bully, Percy Staunton, intended for his rival, Dunstan Ramsay. But when Dunstan dodges it, the pregnant Mary Dempster is struck on the head, causing permanent brain damage and the premature birth of her son. Although it takes him 50 years to reveal who threw the snowball, Dunstan assumes moral responsibility for Mrs. Dempster’s injury and all that ensues from it, including the woman’s mental illness and amoral behavior, the family’s eventual isolation, her son’s running away at an early age, her husband’s desertion, and her eventual need for institutionalization. Dunstan makes Mrs. Dempster and her child the focus of his life. He does chores in the Dempster home, teaches the child magic tricks, befriends Mrs. Dempster, and as an adult becomes her guardian after her husband deserts her and her sister dies. His every major decision—to go to war, to become a teacher, to research and write 10 books about
saints—grows out of his deep sense of responsibility for her. However, Robertson Davies’s novel asks whether it is always appropriate to assume moral responsibility and concludes that its exercise even can become pathological. Dunstan’s acceptance of responsibility for Mrs. Dempster’s injury can be traced to four causes: the power structure of the village, the child’s perception of damnation, his culture’s repressive attitude toward sex, and Dunstan’s understanding that the adults in his life cannot be trusted in this “strange world that showed little of itself on the surface.” First, even at the age of 10, Dunstan correctly perceives that because Percy Staunton belongs to the richest family in the village, it would be almost impossible to accuse him of throwing the snowball without dire consequences for Dunstan. (Ironically, Percy will go on to become one of the richest and most powerful men in the country, and he and Dunstan will perpetuate their dominant-subordinate relationship for life). Second, Dunstan’s childish understanding of the punishments of sin, which he gleans from his church and from his father’s copy of Dante’s Inferno, is so charged with lurid details of eternal damnation that he terrifies himself with the thought that he is one of the damned because if he had not dodged the snowball, Mrs. Dempster would not have been injured. Third, because the snowball incident occurs just as Dunstan is entering puberty in a culture in which the attitude toward sex is “enough to make a hell of adolescence,” Dunstan reasons that because it led to a premature birth, he is “directly responsible for a grossly sexual act—the birth of a child.” Finally, Dunstan realizes that adults cannot be trusted enough to be told the truth about the incident because such a revelation could unleash the powerful chaos of their repressed emotions. The telling episode for him involves his mother, who cries hysterically while she punishes him fiercely for a minor transgression. The act of assuming genuine moral responsibility requires that the individual be capable of reflecting on a situation and deciding how to act. To be morally responsible for something is to be worthy of praise or blame. Dunstan is not old enough to
Fifth Businessâ•…â•… 317 reflect rationally on this incident; he cannot dismiss the irrational fears, nor can he know how to cope with the power differential in the village. As we see later in the novel, his taking on this responsibility is viewed not as praiseworthy but as pathological. Not only can Dunstan not differentiate between the culpability of the agent—the person who threw the snowball—and that of himself as intended victim, who dodged it out of an instinct for his own personal safety, but he also does not consider the fact that he could not have known of the rock in its center. After all, an ordinary snowball most probably would not have injured anyone. Dunstan’s lonely and ill-advised assumption of the entire burden of responsibility at such a young age leads to a pattern of taking on other people’s burdens for the rest of his life and to a life of pathetic isolation until a female con artist to whom he tells his life story challenges his early decision. Percy eventually pays for his act, but Davies’s novel makes it clear that Mrs. Dempster and Dunstan are not simply the bully’s victims but victims of a culture that stood more for self-righteousness than for virtue. Susan R. Bowers
Spirituality in Fifth Business
For Dunstan Ramsay, the protagonist of Fifth Business, spirituality must wage war with religion, a battle that consumes most of his life, from the moment when, as a 10-year-old, he assumes responsibility for a woman’s debilitating head injury from a snowball intended for him until an unlikely teacher helps him to see the truth of who he is. For the residents of Dunstan’s tiny rural Canadian village, religion is marked more by rules, prohibitions, and the fear of damnation than by anything else. As Dunstan observes,”I was a Presbyterian child, and I knew a good deal about damnation.” In particular, Christian grace is in short supply, as Dunstan discovers when Mary Dempster, the woman he befriends because he feels responsible for her injury, violates the town’s rigid moral codes. Her husband, the local Baptist minister, ties her to a chair to keep her indoors, and the townspeople, including Dunstan’s mother, shun her.
Dunstan’s mother forbids him from visiting Mary Dempster, but even as a child, he understands that to comply with her order “would be the end of anything that was good in me.” The truth is that although Dunstan becomes Mary’s self-appointed guardian out of a mistaken sense of culpability, the kindnesses he extends to her initiate a lifelong practice of the compassion that is at the heart of genuine spirituality. Nor is his kindness unrewarded: He discovers early on that, unlike his supposed friendship with Percy Staunton (who had thrown the calamitous snowball), a genuine friendship yields mutual benefit. Even though his befriending of the Dempster family isolates him from his peers and alienates him from his family, Dunstan is able to find comfort in his relationship with Mary, whom he “regarded .╯.╯. as my greatest friend, and the secret league between us as the tap-root that fed my life.” Not unlike the Bible’s Mary Magdalene, the disgraced Mary Dempster displays a powerful, clarifying spirituality evident to Dunstan even as a young boy. He comes to see that even though she is imprisoned in her house and despised by the village, she feels neither disgraced nor humiliated, but lives “in a world of trust that had nothing of the stricken, lifeless, unreal quality of religion about it.” He senses that she “lived by a light that arose from within.” Unlike her husband—of whom Dunstan realizes many years later, “He was a parson, of course, but at root he was a frightened farmer lad”—Mary has no fear. Dunstan even accords her supernatural powers. He believes that Mrs. Dempster brings his brother back from death, and when he is wounded in World War I, he sees her face in a statue of the Virgin. Dunstan’s relationship with Mary Dempster— which continues until her death when he himself is in late middle age—affords him a deep appreciation of beauty and courage of singularity, which he learns from her example. At the very beginning of the novel, we learn that his village lacked “an aesthetic sense.” Thus, Mary’s sense of wonder at the natural world and delight in just being alive contribute to Dunstan’s emerging spirituality. However, it is her ability to be comfortable in herself even while estranged from others—what Dunstan calls her “breadth of outlook and a clarity of vision that were strange and wonderful”—that may be her greatest
318â•…â•… Davis, Rebecca Harding spiritual gift to him. This dedication to her own path of truth is what inspires Dunstan’s lifelong scholarly passion for the lives of saints (about whom he writes 10 books). His saints, like Mary Dempster, are singular figures who fearlessly walk their own paths. In the end, it should not be surprising that another iconoclastic character—a female con artist—should be the one who rescues Dunstan from his lifelong guilt, thus helping him to forgive himself. In this novel, it is the outsiders who are able to defy the inhibitions and sterile religious practices of the crowd and embrace the visionary lessons of Christian grace. Fifth Business is a complex text. On the one hand, the fact that 50 years of Dunstan’s life are warped by a childish and false assumption of responsibility for another’s act is tragic. But on the other hand, what he learns from Mary Dempster gives him access to a world of spirituality forbidden to the blind and intolerant religious examples of his youth. Susan R. Bowers
DAVIS, REBECCA HARDINGâ•… Life in the Iron Millsâ•… (1861)
Life in the Iron Mills is Rebecca Harding Davis’s best-known work. Although Davis (1831–1910) worked as a writer for many years, none of her other work is recognized to have the power and strength of this early novella. The story depicts the struggles of Hugh and his cousin Deborah, workers in the local iron mill. A talented sculptor, Hugh is led to believe that his talent will allow him to transcend his circumstances, but his hopes are dashed when he steals some money from a wealthy man and is sent to prison. At the time that Davis wrote the story, slavery and the incipient Civil War were the center of most people’s attention, as opposed to the difficulties faced by workers in the burgeoning Industrial Revolution. The novella’s publication in the Atlantic Monthly provided Davis (although she was still Rebecca Harding at this point) an entrée into the literary society of Boston. After its publication, she was recognized as an important new writer. However, her later work often did not fulfill these expectations.
Now, almost 100 years after her death in 1910 at the age of 79, Davis’s importance is being recognized again. Although she may never be known as a purely literary writer, her work draws attention not only to the political issues of her time—slavery, the plight of the working class—but also, as the literary scholar Janice Lasseter points out, to the question of the female artist and the way in which she must resolve any conflict she might encounter between the expectations placed upon her as a wife and mother and those she might try to fulfill professionally. Davis herself did not always resolve those conflicts as well as she might have; regardless, the power of this one story is a testament to the power of literature to raise awareness of important issues, whether they happen to be foremost in the news or not. Helen Lynne Schicketanz
Ethics in Life in the Iron Mills
The question of ethics seems to be a relative one in Rebecca Harding Davis’s novella Life in the Iron Mills. Any expectation of ethical behavior seems ultimately to be governed by economics. This is a story in which the poor are expected to behave ethically, regardless of the cost to themselves, while the wealthy are encouraged to act with impunity, taking only their own interests into account. Set against the backdrop of an unnamed industrial town in the early years of the Industrial Revolution, the story depicts a conflict between the poor and deprived mill workers and members of the wealthy class who control their lives not only financially but, indirectly, in nearly all other ways. One night, wealthy men, including the mill owner, visit the mill and watch the work being done. During the course of the evening, the men become aware of the artistic talent manifested by Hugh Wolfe, who works as a puddler (one who purifies pig iron to produce wrought iron). Although they recognize both his talent and his desire to better himself, they mock him, choosing instead to engage in philosophical discussions about who should take responsibility for helping the workers improve their lot. They encourage Hugh—almost willfully, it seems—to believe that, in spite of the debilitating economic and social circumstances in which he is forced to live, there might be a realistic possibility
Life in the Iron Millsâ•…â•… 319 of overcoming his situation. Dr. May tells Hugh, “A man may make himself anything he chooses. God has given you stronger power than many men—me, for instance.” Yet when Hugh asks him to help him achieve exactly this, he refuses, saying that he does not have the money. “Money?” Hugh asks. “That is it? Money?” Deborah, Hugh’s cousin, takes Dr. May at his word and robs Mr. Mitchell, one of the other visitors. She does not entirely understand what Hugh wants, but she is willing to do anything to help him attain his desires, so she steals the money. Although she understands that what she has done is wrong, her lack of ethics does not bother her. What devastates her, however, is the realization that Hugh has decided to kill himself in prison. Hugh’s ethical deliberations, on the other hand, are more complex. His immediate reaction upon receiving the money is to go look for Mitchell, planning to return the money. However, during the course of the night, he reflects again on his situation. Although he is honest, he is tempted by what he believes the money can do for him—to give him the ability to change his life; to change the lives around him; and, most important, to fundamentally change the way he perceives his own worth. He realizes the world’s willingness to label him a thief is negligible in comparison to what he believes the money can achieve. Still, however, he is not entirely convinced that he truly has a right to the money, so he enters a church hoping to find justification for his actions. He perceives that the church as an institution, in spite of its preaching of empathy toward the poor and the meek, treats the sins of people like himself as abstractions. He is the only person who can change his life, even though doing so goes against all the ethical behavior he knows. Consequently, his resolve to keep the money becomes even stronger. The guilt he feels, however, is still not totally assuaged. Later, after he has been imprisoned, he reflects again: “[W]as there right or wrong for such as he? What was right? And who had ever taught him?” To act ethically in the circumstances in which he finds himself seems impossible. Those in power have the ability to act ethically but refuse to do so. In spite of his professed belief in
reform, Mitchell reports the theft to the police, thus ensuring Hugh’s imprisonment. Doctor May, on reading of Hugh’s arrest in the paper, is appalled at what he perceives as Hugh’s ingratitude, an ingratitude that he believes comes from the type of person he is, rather than the fact that he has been cruelly duped with the prospect of a better life. His refusal to understand Hugh allows him to placidly continue to uphold a system whose injustice ensures Hugh’s death. Like so many things in Life in the Iron Mills, ethical behavior seems to be governed solely by social position rather than inherent honesty. Helen Lynne Schicketanz
Guilt in Life in the Iron Mills
One of the ironies in Rebecca Harding Davis’s Life in the Iron Mills is that everyone who should feel guilty about Hugh’s situation does not. In the story, which is set in an unnamed industrial town at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, Deborah’s theft of Mitchell’s money raises questions for all involved. There seems to be no doubt in Deborah’s mind that what she has done is wrong. She says, “I shall be burnt in hell if anyone knows I took it,” but the question of justice clearly is more important to Deborah than the question of honesty. Consequently, she does not seem to feel guilty for what she has done, but merely worried about what might happen should she be caught. Her cousin Hugh works as a puddler (one who purifies molten pig iron to produce wrought iron) in the iron mill and is a very talented sculptor. The mill has, just this night, been visited not only by its owner but by wealthy members of the outside community and the press who seem to have an interest in its success. After nearly running into a piece of Hugh’s sculpture, the men comment on his talent but refuse to help him, even though they clearly have the resources to do so. Even worse, they acknowledge that he has the right to better himself, but rather than help him act on that right, they mock his yearning. Mr. Mitchell comments, “Let them [mill workers] have a clear idea of the rights of the soul, and I’ll venture next week they’ll strike for higher wages. That’ll be the end of it.” Significantly, although Hugh initially does feel guilty about keeping the money that Deborah has
320â•…â•… Davis, Rebecca Harding stolen, for him, too, the question of justice—or, as he might phrase it, his right to better himself, to change the way he perceives himself in the world— eventually asserts itself. He decides that he is also entitled to live the sort of life he believes the wealthy live, “a good, true-hearted life, full of beauty and kind words. He only wanted to know how to use the strength within him.” This plan fails, not only because he does not understand how to carry it out, but because he is caught with the stolen money and sent to prison. It is Deborah, however, whom guilt seems to affect the most strongly. Although she believes in Hugh’s right to the money, she is devastated by what prison has done to him. She breaks down when she sees him in jail, his spirit broken, believing that his state is her fault. The circumstances in which she has been forced to live do not allow her to perceive that Hugh’s downfall should be blamed on the system that put them both where they are. Deborah did take the money, but it was the only possible way out for Hugh, Davis seems to want the reader to believe. His death, which she knows is imminent, must be laid at the feet of this system. Narrative intrusion in Life in the Iron Mills is very pronounced, and it is not difficult to interpret Davis’s opinions on the issues raised. During the course of the night, Hugh enters a church, and Davis’s narrator makes the point that the reason that Christ’s ministry does not fail is that he came directly from the class he was trying to help. In spite of Mitchell’s thoughts that the rich cannot ultimately help someone like Hugh, it is not implied that those in a position to help are absolved of any obligation to do so. Rather, the implication is that even though power does not impart the power to reform, it does carry with it the responsibility for compassion. It is only compassion, Davis states indirectly, that can catalyze reform. The rest is up to those involved. Guilt in this story seems to only affect those who are victims of the system, not those who uphold it. Even though some of the wealthy men understand—at least hypothetically—that they bear some responsibility for Hugh’s inability to better himself, Kirby, the mill owner, flatly rejects this idea, stating that his responsibility toward his workers is financial, nothing more. However, he at least is honest
about his beliefs. The other men, Doctor May and Mitchell, cannot claim such an excuse. Mitchell, in particular, freely quotes the Bible: “Inasmuch as ye did it unto one of the least of these, ye did it unto me,” and yet he reports the theft to the police. In spite of his implied comparison between Hugh and Jesus, Mitchell seems to recuse himself from any possibility of truly helping when he comments that reform must come from the workers themselves rather than the outside. Consequently, he also isolates himself from any possibility of feeling guilt at his need to believe that he cannot help. His actions, unfortunately, typify those who control the system. Helen Lynne Schicketanz
Hope in Life in the Iron Mills
There are many types of false hope dangled before the characters in Rebecca Harding Davis’ bestknown work, Life in the Iron Mills. Set in the early days of the Industrial Revolution, the story takes place in a time and place in which hope would seem an unattainable ideal, particularly for the lowest class of workers at the center of Davis’s story. Hugh Wolfe and his hunchbacked cousin Deborah, the story’s central characters, work in an unnamed industrial town where Hugh feeds the furnace in the iron mill and Deborah works in the nearby cotton mill. Although their lives are filled with unremitting work and dire poverty, Hugh’s “groping passion for whatever was beautiful and pure” and Deborah’s unrequited love for Hugh set the two of them apart from the other workers, most of whom turn to alcohol and fighting to alleviate the utter hopelessness of their lives. Hugh tries to explain this necessity for hope to a wealthy visitor who has found a figure of a woman he has carved from korl, a waste product created in the iron processing. The woman is reaching out her hand in supplication, looking for something “to make her live—like you,” as Hugh tells the visitors. Hope is kindled in his soul when the men visiting the mill tell him that money is all that necessary to make him a great sculptor, so Deborah steals money from one of them. Even though she does not truly understand their discussion or the magnitude of the change Hugh seeks, she wants to make Hugh happy in the hope that he will finally truly love her.
Moll Flandersâ•…â•… 321 Hugh’s dilemma now is that his newly awakened belief in his own right to happiness conflicts with his sense of honesty, so he looks to religion for help. With the money in his pocket, he listens to a sermon in a well-appointed church attended by the rich, and he realizes that his experience of Christianity has almost nothing to do with Christ’s original mission of ministering to the poor, the outcast, and the meek. It is not, therefore, surprising that Hugh ends up in jail, although it is ironic that jail is where he finds his final hope in suicide. There is a strong intimation in the story that Hugh has been sacrificed to redeem his society from the sins it has committed against his class, and the hope for a changed future is realized when, after serving her sentence for her role as Hugh’s accomplice, Deborah is taken in by the nearby Quaker community. Significantly, while Hugh and Deborah attempt to achieve their hopes, the men who visit the mill consciously reject their ability to provide hope to their oppressed workers. It appears that they have at least some sympathy for the downtrodden workers when they conduct a philosophical discussion about who is responsible for lifting the mill hands up, acknowledging their theoretical obligation to those less fortunate than they. Although Dr. May in particular believes that by praising Hugh’s talent he is showing Hugh the hope for a different and much better life, his almost willful misunderstanding of the difficulty of Hugh’s circumstances only serves to confuse Hugh. When Dr. May tells Hugh that he has the talent to be a great sculptor but then refuses to help him become so, citing a lack of money, he has opened a window of hope yet cruelly closed it again. The reader’s hope for change is also dashed by the disconnect between Dr. May’s apparent sympathy for Hugh’s plight and his reaction to the news of Hugh’s sentence of 19 years in prison for grand larceny. It seems that Dr. May is incapable of any sort of compassion, even given the circumstances under which the theft occurred: “Scoundrel! Serves him right! After all our kindness that night! Picking Mitchell’s pocket at the very time!” While Dr. May’s refusal of hope seems almost crafted, the attitude of Kirby (the son of the mill owner) is much less conscious. He would prefer that the men and women of Hugh’s class be machines. That way, they could
feel no pain and would be unable to understand the important things in life they are missing. This attitude is especially telling because it absolves him of any further responsibility. Although Life in the Iron Mills is fiction, the hopelessness felt by Hugh and Deborah is reflective of the experience of so many of the workers who made their way to the iron mills, the cotton mills, and the other factories of early industrial America. So, too, is the continuing sense of optimism implied by Deborah’s joining the Quaker community. Helen Lynne Schicketanz
DEFOE, DANIELâ•… Moll Flandersâ•… (1722)
Published in 1722, Daniel Defoe’s Moll Flanders is one of the earliest novels written in English. Its structure makes it difficult to read, understand, or analyze with any confidence. It has no chapter breaks, and each of Moll’s stories leads to the next almost without transition. Often, Moll weaves back and forth between stories, returning to one when she seems to be in the middle of another. Moll Flanders tells her story in the first person, in a carefree and conversational tone, but the hardto-follow narrative is confounded by the number of important characters. In the course of her life, Moll has five husbands, three lovers, and at least 11 children. In possibly the most infamous incident of the novel, she is horrified to discover that her third husband is also her half brother. The fact that Moll can experience the loss of a husband or lover and abandon or put out to foster care each of her children in barely a sentence or two makes it easy for a reader to confuse the characters with each other or to forget a character’s involvement in an episode altogether. Despite these problems, Moll Flanders is an entertaining story, primarily because of Moll’s indefatigable energy, wit, and resourcefulness. The novel’s structure reconciles the seemingly insolvable problem presented by a very simple question: Is it wrong to steal if you are starving, or even just afraid of starving? The moral of Moll’s story, when taken as a whole, would seem to be: No. Carman Curton
322â•…â•… Defoe, Daniel
Commodification/Commercialization in Moll Flanders
Moll Flanders is so clearly a novel of commerce and commodification that it may be hard to see any other motives for its characters. Moll sees everything as a commercial transaction. Whether or not the reader is appalled by this, Daniel Defoe means it to be clear that Moll is no more and no less than a product of her environment. Moll herself was born merely to benefit her mother. Though Moll did not produce money, her mother’s pregnancy spared her from hanging in prison. In England during the 17th and 18th centuries, a woman sentenced to death could “plead her belly,” and her sentence would be delayed long enough for the child to be born. Early in her adult life, Moll continues to see other lessons in the commodification of all personal relationships. Having no home of her own, she lives with the mayor’s family and is part of a conversation between the mayor’s son and daughter in which the daughter declares that marriage is nothing more than a marketplace and that a woman without money has no value. Moll learns this lesson and applies it during her many marriages and affairs throughout her lifetime. Soon after the marriage marketplace conversation, Moll begins an affair with the mayor’s elder son and is very willing to accept the money he offers her to keep the affair secret. He promises to marry her later, but she confesses to the reader that she was not concerned about marriage but, rather, was persuaded by her pride in being found attractive and by the gold coins he had given her. Moll later marries the family’s younger son and is widowed about five years after. When she goes back out into the world, Moll declares that she will marry a wealthy man or none at all. The reader may be shocked at the bald greed of this statement, yet Defoe constructs a world for Moll in which seemingly every person is motivated by profit—even during the most personal of family relationships. Again and again, Moll encounters men who are more interested in the wealth of their future wives than in their appearances or personalities. Moll marries her second husband for love but soon realizes he is as interested in spending her money as he is in spending time with her. He leaves her without much ado when he flees to France to escape being
jailed for debt. Her third husband also marries her because he believes Moll has a fortune. When he is disappointed in that expectation, he convinces her to travel to Virginia to manage his plantations there more profitably. It is in Virginia that Moll learns her husband is also her brother, and while she tries to persuade her husband/brother to let her leave the marriage and return to England, he objects to her plan with the argument that it would harm his “prosperity.” Moll eventually does leave Virginia and her brother/husband but again finds when she is in the marriage market that every man she would find suitable is only looking for a woman who will bring a substantial amount of money to the marriage. Moll chooses to “deceive the deceiver” and again allows her friends and neighbors to believe she is quite wealthy when she is courted and married by her “Lancashire husband,” a man she also calls Jemmy and whom she believes to have a very large estate. Shortly after their marriage (Moll’s fourth), they discover that each has tricked the other into a nearly destitute union, and so they part, though on good terms, a few days later. The pair are reunited years after and end up living together in America, very comfortably, because of the inheritance left Moll by her mother—who was also the mother of her brother/husband. Here, Jemmy, who turns out to have been a rake and a highwayman, becomes genuinely repentant, primarily because of the wealth he and Moll now enjoy. Whether Defoe approves or laments Moll’s overriding characteristic—that she reduces every human relationship to a financial transaction—is difficult to say. Yet he clearly wanted his audience to understand that Moll Flanders was a perfect reflection of her—and by extension Defoe’s—England. A greedy, selfish, uncaring woman who will only continue any family relationship or personal friendship as long as it produces some benefit—usually, but not always, financial—is the only possible product of the society whose values she reflects. Carman Curton
Ethics in Moll Flanders
It is not until the middle of Moll Flanders that Moll’s ethics, her personal code of moral behavior, become
Moll Flandersâ•…â•… 323 perfectly clear to the reader. During the episode in which Moll marries her fifth husband, whom she calls the “grave gentleman,” she reflects sadly on her life up to this point. She regrets that in order to marry, she must deceive her future husband by keeping the truth of her previous nine assorted lovers and four marriages, including one to her own half brother, secret. Moll reconciles her self-disgust with her deception by saying to herself that she will make up for her past by being a good wife to him—if God will give her the grace to do so. And Moll is as good as her word until this husband dies and leaves her with two children and no income, although she does live on what he leaves her for two years. However, at the beginning of her long period as a thief, just after the death of this husband, she mentions her fear of poverty again and again. Clearly, to Moll, that fear is as terrifying as actual deprivation. As she begins her criminal career, she asserts that “Poverty .╯.╯. is the sure Bane of Virtue,” “Poverty is, I believe, the worst of all Snares,” and the wise man’s prayer is, “Give me not Poverty lest I Steal.” Up to this point in the novel, just a little beyond halfway through the story and up to the last of her marriages, Moll has merely played a series of performances to entice various men into marrying and supporting her. However, after the death of the “grave gentleman,” Moll turns to a straightforward life of crime as a thief and a prostitute, although her adventures in both fields are primarily crimes of opportunity. Moll’s second criminal act, however, appears to demonstrate that even she has scruples. Spotting a young girl who is expensively dressed, Moll pretends to lead her home safely and steals her gold necklace. While they are alone together, she says, the Devil tells her to kill the girl. Even Moll is horrified at the thought, however, and sends the child away safely. This event marks the third time in the novel that she balks at doing something she believes is morally repugnant. Earlier, she refuses to have an abortion to hide a previous affair from the “grave gentleman.” She prefers, instead, to pretend she is wealthy, have the child, and send him out to be fostered in another family, as readers must assume she has for at least a few of her previous seven children. Previously, and most famously, Moll is also so repulsed by her acci-
dental marriage to her own brother that she sticks to her scruples and continues to look for escape from it even when her brother/husband threatens to have her committed to an asylum, and even as she realizes that she would have no legal claim to any of the family’s wealth if her marriage were to be found invalid. As much as Moll protests the occasional pang of conscience, however, her narrative does not offer very many clues as to the limits of her behavior. Her actions do make clear, though, that Moll does what is necessary—necessary not just to survive, but to survive happily and comfortably. Defoe’s novel offers no evidence that would lead the reader to believe that Moll would not kill the girl with the gold necklace, abort the baby she conceives before marrying the “grave gentleman,” or even remain with her husband/brother if she had not been able to find a way out of those difficult situations. Indeed, Moll keeps the secret of her incestuous marriage to herself for three years before confiding it to her mother. Even then the two of them scheme together for months before finally revealing the truth of their relationship to her husband/brother. Moll further remains in the marriage and the house until she secures not only his permission to leave but also enough money and goods to return to England satisfied with her prospects. Daniel Defoe’s narrative in Moll Flanders expounds on typical punishments for the types of crimes Moll commits, such as being exiled overseas (called “being transported”) or hanging for many crimes. Combined with Moll’s ethics, which her actions reveal are perfectly malleable, even disposable, whenever she sees poverty looming, these harsh punishments demonstrate to the reader that the poor, and especially poor women, are disposable in the England of Defoe’s time. Carman Curton
Innocence and Experience in Moll Flanders
The difference between innocence and experience is all the difference in the world for Moll Flanders, narrator and main character in the novel of the same name. She learns quickly from experience, and almost always profits from it. The few regrets she
324â•…â•… Defoe, Daniel has in her life are nearly always the result of her lack of experience—in other words, her innocence. The daughter of a transported convict, Moll enters a kind of orphanage at about three years old. She is mocked when, as a girl, she innocently expresses her wish not to become a servant but to support herself as a “gentlewoman.” In England during Moll’s century, a gentlewoman earned her keep by marrying a gentleman, and there was virtually no work available through which a single woman could legally support herself. As a young woman, Moll lives with a mayor and his family and is innocent enough to believe the mayor’s oldest son loves her and will marry her when he inherits, so Moll becomes his lover. The affair ends painfully, though, when the younger brother falls in love with her, and the elder brother not only insists that she marry the younger brother but also breaks off the affair, says he will never marry her, and manipulates people and events to make the other marriage go smoothly. After her husband’s death, Moll leaves his family behind, including her two children, and uses these experiences with men and money to lie and cheat her way through the rest of her life. Though Moll makes another mistake in her next marriage by choosing a man who lives far beyond his income and spends all her money, still she continues to move around England using what she knows of human nature to try to arrange profitable marriages and sometimes profitable affairs as well. She continues to make mistakes—her third husband is comfortably well-off but turns out to be her half brother—and she and her fourth husband (whom she calls her Lancashire husband) each trick the other into believing they are wealthy. However, Moll sees her mistakes as little more than short-term setbacks and is always willing to start over again and to make use of her experience in her next scam. After the death of her fifth husband and her quick abandonment of her seventh child, Moll’s readiness to take advantage of the innocence of others moves into a whole new realm as she becomes a skilled pickpocket and a clever thief. Twice Moll steals jewelry from very young girls, and each time she blames the theft on the parents, saying the experience will teach them to take better care of their
daughters. Moll gives precise details about a particular attempt at stealing a lady’s gold watch, and again she calls the other woman a “fool” for being too inexperienced at being robbed to catch Moll in the act. Moll, though, learns from each experience, thinks up new ways of stealing, and is always willing to be more careful and to change her strategy, her name, her locale, or her costume if experience tells her she will be a better thief for it. When Moll is finally caught, taken to Newgate Prison, sentenced to hang, and then manages to have her sentence reduced to a term of exile to the American colonies, her experience shows her that enough money, kind words, and good appearance can lighten even that sentence. Almost immediately after arriving in the New World, she and her Lancashire husband (with whom she has been reunited in Newgate) set up as plantation owners and begin profiting from their new situation. It is impossible to assign a consistent meaning to Moll Flanders as a whole or in part. Daniel Defoe’s preface says that Moll’s “autobiography” is a morality tale and that the story demonstrates that every bad deed is punished, every criminal pays for his or her crime. Yet, Defoe clearly does not mean his words to be taken seriously, for Moll is a sinner who is not very good and yet has done very well. Moll and her husband end up happy, healthy, living well into old age in their beloved England. What is more, they profit, not in spite of all of their crimes but because of them. Thus, in the context of the novel, innocence is always painful and expensive. Experience, on the other hand, is always good when Moll is able and— more important, willing—to use her experience to take advantage of another’s innocence. Carman Curton
DEFOE, DANIELâ•… Robinson Crusoe (The Life and Strange Surprising Adventures of Robinson Crusoe of York, Mariner. Who lived eight and twenty years all alone in an uninhabited Island on the Coast of America near the Mouth of the great river Oroonoque. Having been cast in shore by Shipwreck, wherein all the men perished but
Robinson Crusoeâ•…â•… 325
Himself. With an account how he was at last as strangely delivered by Pyrates. Written by Himself )â•… (1719)
Robinson Crusoe is one of English literature’s first and best-known novels. Since 1719, when it was first published in England, the adventurous story has continued to find readers. Numerous translations, adaptations, and editions for children have contributed to the success. The narrator of the story is the major character, Robinson Crusoe himself, who looks back on previous experiences. He tells how, as a young sailor in the middle 1600s, he experienced many hardships, such as storms, mutiny, and captivity. But the true trial came in 1659 when a vicious storm wrecked the ship. Being the sole survivor of the crew, he found himself at the shore of an unknown tropical island. In this desolate place he had to find means to survive until, after 28 years on the island, he could return to England. The second central character is Friday, a man whom Crusoe captured on the island; Friday became his servant and companion for many years. The moral of the narrative is that an individual can defeat hardships through skills, persistence, and personal faith. Defoe’s primary aim was probably to teach young readers the virtues of religion and culture, but the novel’s long-lasting success is more due to its adventurous aspects. The most explicit themes are survival, isolation, and religion, but it also deals with such topics as the individual and society, gender (masculinity), and race. Tilda Maria Forselius
Isolation in Robinson Crusoe
After a storm, the seafarer Robinson Crusoe—the central character and narrator of Daniel Defoe’s novel—is washed ashore on an unknown island. He realizes that he is the only survivor of the ship’s crew and that the island is uninhabited. Of the 28 years he spends on the island before he is rescued, he lacks human company for 24 years, and his effort to handle this isolation is a significant theme of the novel. An important aspect of this loneliness is that Crusoe has to solve problems by himself and use his own rationality in all actions. He has had very little practical schooling during his upbringing, and now, in the unknown land, there is no one to ask or
with whom he might deliberate or cooperate. The narrative describes how he solves his problems—for example, the immediate problem of sheltering himself from the potential attacks of wild beasts during the first night. He brings with him “a short Stick, like a Truncheon, for my Defence,” climbs up in “a thick bushy Tree like a Firr, but thorny,” and places himself so that he will not fall if he goes to sleep. During the years he spends in solitude on the island, he is constantly facing new problems to solve, and “learning by doing” is the general method. In spite of many setbacks, his persistence is successful in the long run. Here, Defoe is using Crusoe’s isolation to depict the philosophy of empiricism, according to which humans should learn things based only on experience and, on the grounds of such experience, construct sensible theories upon which to act. Crusoe regards his isolation both as a punishment and as deliverance. In the moral logic of his story, the situation is a consequence of his sinful life at sea and the disappointments that he caused his father. It seems his father’s warning—that if he should leave home without blessings, there would be no one to assist in his recovery—have come true. He thinks, “I am divided from Mankind, a Solitaire, one banish’d from humane Society.” On the other hand, he also underscores his gratitude to be spared from death. In time, he finds that his separateness from society gives him many new insights, and he realizes that the isolation in itself can be regarded as a kind of recovery: “In the first Place, I was remov’d from all the Wickedness of the World here. I had neither the Lust of the Flesh, the Lust of the Eye, or the Pride of Life. I had nothing to covet; for I had all that I was now capable of enjoying.” By resigning to God’s will, he learns that his life is “better than sociable” because he can either converse “mutually with my own Thoughts” or with God himself through prayers. Even if he manages to solve the survival problems all by himself, and even if he can praise the spiritual aspects of the solitude, Crusoe’s want for a “Soul to speak to” does not vanish. One dog, two cats, and a talking parrot form the “little Family” that keeps him company, but they do not compensate for his desire for human comrades. Paradoxical as it may seem, when he discovers a human footprint
326â•…â•… Defoe, Daniel in the sand and understands that he is not alone at the island, his isolation is extended. Realizing that it is made by a potential enemy, he does not move around on the island as before. For the coming two years, he works on improving his shelters “in the constant Snare of the Fear of Man.” The seclusion that he thus creates for himself plays a significant part in his survival. In Robinson Crusoe’s 24th year on the island, he sees a shipwreck offshore, and this causes new eruptions of his longing for company. He is surprised by his strong feelings. “O that it had been but One! I believe I repeated the Words, O that it had been but One!” But no living man, just a corpse, is washed ashore from the ship. Not long after this event, Crusoe manages to help a man escape from the cannibals who sometimes come to the island. This man, whom he calls Friday, becomes Robinson’s servant, pupil and friend for the remaining four years on the island and thus, his isolation is over. Tilda Maria Forselius
Religion in Robinson Crusoe
As a young man, Robinson Crusoe had a rather shallow relationship with religion. According to his narrative, the Christian God that was conceptually conveyed by his English upbringing appeared as a well-meaning father who expected dutiful submission. When Crusoe defies his father’s wishes by going to sea, this is described as an immature denial of his obligations to God. He leaves home without blessings but with his father’s warning that there would “be none to assist in my Recovery,” words that follow him as a bad omen. The vicious storms that he experiences as a young seafarer are understood as “the Judgment of Heaven for my wicked leaving my Father’s House, and abandoning my Duty.” In fear for his survival, he makes promises to God but easily breaks them when the danger is over. It is during his many years as a castaway on a desolate island, far from authorities and social conventions, that Crusoe gradually develops a deep personal belief. The first really divine moment that he experiences occurs after the disastrous storm that wrecks his and his shipmates’ boat. When he alone finds himself saved on the shore of an island and realizes that he is safe from the waves, while all his
comrades are drowned, he is deeply overwhelmed by feelings of gratitude: “I walk’d about on the Shore, lifting up my Hands, and my whole Being, as I may say, wrapt up in the Contemplation of my Deliverance, making a Thousand Gestures and Motions which I cannot describe.” A parallel situation appears after about 10 months on the island when Crusoe discovers by chance “some few Stalks of something green, shooting out of the Ground” and recognizes that it is barley “of the same Kind as our European, nay, as our English Barley.” This discovery leads to his first serious religious considerations. Up till this moment, he “had very few Notions of Religion in my Head” but now he “began to suggest, that God had miraculously caus’d this Grain to grow without any Help of Seed sown, and that it was so directed purely for my Sustenance, on that wild miserable Place.” Even if he finds out that there is a natural explanation to the barley—he had unknowingly scattered the seed himself when emptying a bag—the episode is significant as the opening to a part of the novel that closely depicts his religious turning point. When he falls badly ill in a fever attack and has a strange and frightening nightmare, Crusoe’s “Conscience that had slept so long, begun to awake.” He deeply blames himself for his rejections and shortcomings earlier in life, prepares to die, and says his first prayer for many years, asking God for help. Recovering from the lengthy fever, Crusoe develops into a humble and devoted Scripture disciple. The Bible that he has brought from the shipwreck becomes an object of regular study, and because his thoughts are being directed “to things of a higher Nature,” he finds “a great deal of Comfort within, which till now I knew nothing of.” In the narrative, this new state of mind is associated with an improved self-confidence. Crusoe explores the island more thoroughly, finds fertile areas, and starts to think of the advantages of being at this place, and he thanks God for all that he has been given. The novel also portrays Crusoe’s views on other religions and rituals. When he first sees the traces of the cannibals’ feasts, his reaction is to go to war against them in God’s name, but after some time he realizes that he has no right to judge their way of living. They are not murderers, he reflects, “any
Robinson Crusoeâ•…â•… 327 more than those Christians were Murtherers, who often put to Death the Prisoners taken in Battle; or more frequently, upon many Occasions, put whole Troops of Men to the Sword.” Later, when Crusoe has company by “three subjects” to which he appears as a king, he reflects about their “three different Religions. My Man Friday was a Protestant, his Father was a Pagan and a Cannibal, and the Spaniard was a Papist.” He interjects that he allows “Liberty of Conscience throughout my Dominions.” In spite of this tolerance, there is no question of which belief that Crusoe—and Defoe—rank as the highest. Multiple allusions to parts of the Bible and to hymns remind us of the fact that the novel was meant at least partly as a teaching book. In fact, Crusoe teaches his conviction to his servant Friday so effectively that the former pagan and cannibal declares himself a Protestant. Seen from the perspective of the history of ideas, Robinson Crusoe’s journey from shallowly felt religious obligations to a humble and heartfelt personal faith is associated with a more general turning point in religious practices of the Western world during the 1700s. The established Anglican church at this time was moribund, and new offshoots arose that enabled individuals to practice their Christian faith in different and more personal ways. Tilda Maria Forselius
Survival in Robinson Crusoe
Since its publication in 1719, Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe has been a powerful story of survival for innumerable readers. Most prominent in the novel’s survival theme is the everyday struggle for subsistence that the main character, the castaway Robinson Crusoe, has to fight on a desolate tropical island, but the narrative also depicts other threats to his existence, such as storms at sea, an earthquake, fever, and human enemies such as pirates and cannibals. Crusoe, who tells the story retrospectively in first person, initially relates that as a young man he could not drop the idea of going to sea. In spite of his parents’ warnings of the risks and misfortunes that might strike him, he chooses to leave home to go on his first sea voyage. From that moment throughout the narrative, his life is repeatedly at stake. The sea storms are the most apparent threats of the first
part of the story. Facing his first tempests as a sailor, Crusoe in death agony promises to go straight back home “if it would please God here to spare my Life,” but this resolution fades away once the sea has become calm again. The third vicious storm that he experiences proves to be disastrous. During a journey to bring slaves to Brazil, the ship is stranded, and all the men are swallowed by the waves. However, Crusoe finds himself “sav’d, as I may say, out of the very Grave” as he alone is carried by the waves ashore onto an apparently uninhabited island. Whereas surviving the storms has to do with providence, according to Robinson’s story, his 28-year-long existence on the island mainly owes to strategic thinking and skills that he develops over time. Just after being rescued from the storm, he does not expect to stay alive more than one night and decides to “consider the next Day what Death I should dye.” But with the equipment and goods that he manages to fetch from the stranded ship before it breaks into pieces and vanishes, he finds means to improve his situation step by step and hence to nourish and protect himself. He collects food from what nature offers, including wild grapes, melons, cocoa, and turtles. He builds shelters—first a tent, then a fortress, a house, a storehouse, and so on. He captures wild goat kids that he tames to keep as cattle; develops some agriculture; and manufactures things such as clay pots, furniture, a lamp, and a canoe. By cutting a notch with his knife every day in a wooden cross, he keeps track of the time he spends on “the Island of Despair,” as he calls it. The narrative conveys that even in a desperate situation, man can survive and make a life for himself by using his mind and hands. This is not only a matter of physical survival; very significant is the associated mental process through which Crusoe matures to become a capable man. The journal that he writes with some ink and paper from the shipwreck appears as a tool for this moral growth. Instead of falling into self-pity, the diary writing makes him reflect more impartially on his situation. A record where he states “like Debtor and Creditor, the Comforts I enjoy’d, against the Miseries I suffer’d” helps him accommodate his way of living “to make things as easy to me as I could.” In time, the psychological strategy to improve things by
328â•…â•… DeLillo, Don focusing on the options, even if they are limited, makes him appear more of a sovereign of the island than a victim. Crusoe’s survival skills include his repeated escapes from and defeats of human enemies, as well as his rescues of others. On the island, he hides from the cannibals that occasionally come there to make feasts of the human prey they bring with them. One of the cannibals’ captives escapes and survives with Crusoe’s assistance. The man, whom Crusoe calls Friday as they meet on a Friday, becomes his helper and friend. Eventually, an English ship aboard which there has been a mutiny comes to the island. By helping the captain and his loyal men to escape from the mutineers and reclaim the ship, Crusoe is at last rescued from the island where he has survived for 28 years and returns to England, where new life challenges wait for him. The story of the castaway who survives in the wilderness can be regarded a salute to values that are characteristic of the Enlightenment period of the 18th century, such as faith in the individual’s ability to reason and in the virtues of self-reliance. Moreover, the inner development that the hero makes from despair to constructive thinking and behavior provides an aspect of the survival theme that can be applied to many life situations and times. Tilda Maria Forselius
DELILLO, DONâ•… White Noiseâ•… (1985)
White Noise won the National Book Award for 1985 and is the first of Don DeLillo’s novels to achieve widespread critical and popular acclaim. The novel portrays American culture as fragmented, spiritually adrift, and filled with the noise of entertainment, technology, information, and commercialism. Above all, it depicts the individual uncertainty and fear that comes from trying to make sense of the culture’s pervasive “white noise.” At the center of the novel are Jack Gladney; his wife, Babette; and their children from various marriages, four of whom live with them. Gladney holds the chair of Hitler studies at College-on-theHill; one of his low-level anxieties emerges from his inability to speak German, and he is taking private German lessons in advance of an interna-
tional Hitler conference. His high-level anxiety is a distracting and despairing fear of death, a fear that he shares with his wife. One of the novel’s plot lines involves Gladney’s discovery that Babette is taking Dylar, an experimental drug that supposedly suppresses the fear of death. She has had an affair with the drug’s creator, Willie Mink, and Gladney tracks him with the mixed motives of seeking revenge and getting the drug for himself. Another plot involves a chemical spill that threatens the town and forces an evacuation, during which Gladney is exposed. This heightens his fear of death and spurs his interest in finding Mink, whom he shoots but then takes to a hospital. The novel ends with little resolution of the anxieties that plague its characters. Themes that inform the novel include ambition, commodification/commercialization, death, futility, individual and society, parenthood, science and technology, and spirituality. Michael Little
Commodification/Commercialization in White Noise
The opening pages of White Noise recount Jack Gladney’s observations as students move into their dorms at College-on-the-Hill. Gladney begins by telling us, in the first sentence, that the “station wagons arrived at noon.” He mentions people—the students—only a single time in the opening paragraph; the bulk of his narration is dedicated to listing the possessions that are unloaded, several identified by their brand names. Much later in the novel, he listens to his daughter Steffie mumble in her sleep one night, knowing that he recognizes what she is saying but is unable to figure it out. After several minutes, he recognizes the words to be the name of a car: Toyota Celica. Before he is able to identify her words and what they mean, he is transfixed by her mumbling. Once he places the words and makes the connection, he is even more in awe. Trying to figure out why he should be so moved to hear his daughter mumble the name of a car, he decides that there is something transcendent in her repetition of a phrase that is universally known and embedded so deeply in her consciousness that she chants it in her sleep, while at the same time it is embedded in his consciousness so deeply that he cannot even make
White Noiseâ•…â•… 329 sense of it at first. This level of subconscious product placement pervades the novel and the cultural “white noise” of the novel’s title: Even Gladney, the novel’s narrator, will at times interject lists of product names, often with no apparent connection to the narration’s other material. Gladney himself is a commodity, having invented the academic field of Hitler studies and having sold the field and his value in it to College-on-the-Hill, where he is chair of the Hitler studies department. His colleague Murray Jay Siskind admires his creation in terms of ownership (“He is now your Hitler, Gladney’s Hitler”) that imply Gladney has commodified Hitler and made himself the sole retailer. Gladney sells Hitler, and he sells himself by wearing dark glasses and academic robes in order to create an image that is easy to compare to product packaging. Commodification in White Noise extends beyond the traditional concept of branding, though, to include not just the products we think about but the way our fears are created and then sold back to us. A real estate office, for example, displays pictures of Victorian homes that are not available because they are no longer for sale or because they are not even in that town: A way of life is commodified, sold to prospective home buyers and even local citizens, who simply see the images by first generating a desire for that way of life—or, put another way, by generating fear of not having that way of life. Fear of bodily danger is commodified as well: After a family discussion of all of the ways electrical and magnetic fields emanating from television and radio and power lines can harm us, Gladney observes, “Terrifying data is now an industry in itself. Different firms compete to see how badly they can scare us.” And throughout the novel, he makes references to all of the ways commodified products fail to calm our commodified fears: “This is a town of tag sales and yard sales, the failed possessions arrayed in driveways.╯.╯.╯.” A powerful example of the way commodification pacifies us occurs in one of the more famous scenes, the story of “the most photographed barn in America.” Gladney and Murray Jay Siskind drive to view the barn and the tourists who have come to take pictures of it (or buy postcards). Siskind makes several observations about the barn, arguing
that people cannot see the barn once they have seen the signs announcing it as the most photographed in America, that they are all there to reinforce the barn’s status and to participate in something communal and larger than themselves. The barn is no longer a barn but a commodity that sells comfort in group participation. People are reassured because their actions are sanctioned by all of the people who have come before, who are there now, and who will follow. Later, Siskind will point out that we are reassured by knowing that we are the targets of marketing, and that there is special fear in realizing that we are no longer of interest to marketers when we become “consumers who have lost their group identity.” Michael Little
Death in White Noise
One of the minor characters in White Noise is 19-year-old Orest Mercator, who wants to set a world record for consecutive hours sitting enclosed with 27 poisonous snakes. Jack Gladney, the novel’s narrator, argues at length with Orest about the danger involved (and the pointlessness of courting that danger): Jack repeatedly tells him that he will die if the snakes bite him, and Orest repeatedly counters that the snakes will not bite him. When Orest finally begins his experiment, nothing goes as planned: He is in a hotel room rather than a glass box, there are only three snakes instead of 27, the snakes are not venomous, and he is bitten within four minutes. The Orest/snake story line is a small part of the novel, but it helps to bracket the various responses to the idea of death with which the novel is so deeply concerned. For example, the contrast in tone from the seriousness and intractableness of the original conversation to the absurdity of the final event help to construct the novel’s ambivalence about how serious death is but how misguided we may be to take it too seriously. These extremes are manifested as well in the conversation that Orest and Jack have: At one extreme, Orest is unable to acknowledge the possibility, much less the certainty, of death in general (although he does have antivenom with him during his snake experiment), while Jack is obsessed by death in concrete terms. Jack and his wife, Babette,
330â•…â•… DeLillo, Don discuss at length how they each hope to be the first to die and argue at length about which of them will suffer more as the survivor (although we learn that Jack does not really want to die first, simply because he does not want to die at all). Babette’s anxieties are more pronounced than she will admit to Jack; she is, in fact, secretly taking Dylar, an experimental drug that purportedly suppresses the fear of death. Her daughter Denise finds the medication and turns it over to Jack, who spends much of the novel trying to find out what the drug is, what it is for, and how Babette gets it. He finds that Babette is cheating on him—the maker of Dylar, Willie Mink, demands sex as payment for the drug. This affair provides Jack with an excuse for tracking down and even shooting Mink, but his quest has been as much about revenge as it has been about getting the drug for himself. One of the novel’s concerns is the way we define ourselves according to how we respond to death. Babette’s fear of death is abstract; Jack’s is more concrete. Jack is exposed to Neodene D when a train derails and releases the chemical in a toxic cloud; he steps out of his car during the ensuing evacuation, and the brief exposure is enough to raise concerns for the technicians at the evacuation site. They are unable to tell Jack anything certain, though. The most informative one can be is to tell him that Neopryne D has a life span of 30 years, that they will know more about it in 15 years, and if Jack is still alive then, he can take comfort in knowing that he is halfway there. At the same time, the technician offers the standard reassurances that Jack’s situation is really no different from anyone else’s, telling him that he should proceed with his life plans as if nothing has changed. Jack cannot take these words to heart, though, and begins to obsess about death as much as Babette does. Events throughout the novel serve to counter the dire and grim anxieties that Babette and Jack share. Jack thinks death has come to claim him early one morning when he sees his father-in-law, Vernon, sitting in the backyard without recognizing him; when Vernon leaves a few days later, he lists all of his physical ailments but insists they are nothing to worry about. Jack’s six-year-old, Wilder, rides his tricycle across a busy highway without incident. After Jack shoots Willie Mink, he immediately begins
working to save his life and is surprised to learn that the nuns at the hospital he goes to have no belief in an afterlife; one says that the comfort of the afterlife is a fiction they maintain to comfort everyone else. When all the novel’s conversations and discussions and examinations of the topic are over, we are left with a complexly structured and uneasy acceptance of death’s omnipresence and inevitability, an exploration of contemporary spiritual malaise and the resulting cultural obsession with death. Michael Little
Science and Technology in White Noise
Jack Gladney’s 14-year-old son, Heinrich, has a receding hairline, and Gladney wonders if he has ignorantly or irresponsibly allowed his son to be exposed to something dangerous in the air. Technology in White Noise is mysterious, pervasive, and only seemingly under control. It is transparent enough that characters tend not to think about how they use it, what it does, how it works, or even its dangers, and it is complex enough that characters do not know what to do about it when the dangers become real. Often, the technological source of the danger is unknowable. When the local grade school is evacuated because of something that gives the kids headaches (and will even kill an investigator), the cause is indeterminate: “.╯.╯. it could be the ventilating system, the paint or varnish, the foam insulation, the electrical insulation, the cafeteria food, the rays emitted by microcomputers .╯.╯.” and the list continues from there, including the protective suits the investigators wear. The novel’s characters are seen to live with an almost reckless relationship to technology, using it but not understanding anything about it. Heinrich lectures his family about the hidden dangers of radiation coming from power lines, police radar, microwaves, radio, and television, while Gladney’s wife Babette is taking an experimental drug, Dylar, that promises to inhibit the fear of death. She knows nothing about how it works or what it might be doing to her, and Gladney enlists the help of a neuroscientist to investigate the drug and determine what effects it has. Before she can identify the drug’s purpose or effects, she is able to identify the mechanics of how it works, how
A Christmas Carolâ•…â•… 331 it dissolves in a slow and controlled fashion to deliver its chemicals at a precise rate—she calls it “a wonderful little system.” Throughout the novel, characters demonstrate this mix of ignorance and awe in the face of technology. Local sunsets have been spectacular, for example, yet no one knows why: One theory is that a toxic chemical spill has left residue in the atmosphere; another is that the microorganisms released to eat the original chemical cloud are themselves the residue affecting the sunsets. No one knows. The toxic chemical spill that may or may not be affecting the sunsets is one of the novel’s primary events. The chemical, Nyodene D, is a byproduct of pesticides; Heinrich has been taught about it in school, and the sum of knowledge about the chemical is that it is “very dangerous, except no one seem to know exactly what it causes in humans or in the offspring of humans. They tested for years and either they don’t know for sure or they know and aren’t saying.” The entire incident displays the degree to which we depend on technology as well as the tenuous control we have over it, from the train derailment that causes the spill to the failure of responders to contain it, even to the failure of Nyodene D’s creators to understand just what effects their product has. When Gladney is exposed briefly during the evacuation, technicians can tell him only that his situation is vaguely serious, and if he lives long enough, they will be able to tell him more about it. Characters in White Noise live a fragile existence alongside the technology they have created and use but barely comprehend. Nyodene D is an extreme example of the degree to which we do not understand our technological creations, but DeLillo argues that it is not just the creators who are to blame. In the midst of the evacuation, Heinrich again lectures about humans’ reliance on technology, observing that conditions are suddenly like returning to the Stone Ages, where “we can’t even tell people the basic principles much less actually make something that would improve conditions.” He mentions refrigerators and matches, mocks his father’s explanation of radio waves moving through the air because it sounds like magic, and ultimately suggests that our shameful ignorance about the
nature of our technology makes us entirely dependent on it. In the final analysis, technology in White Noise is that which enables and enriches our lives but threatens at the same time to destroy us; or, as one character puts it, technology “creates an appetite for immortality on the one hand. It threatens universal extinction on the other.” Michael Little
DICKENS, CHARLESâ•… A Christmas Carolâ•… (1843)
A Christmas Carol is one of Charles Dickens’s most popular works. It has been read, loved, and collected by generations. More than 167 years since its publication, it still remains in fashion and is part of the English-speaking world’s Christmas imagination. Dickens (1812–70), the best-known novelist of the Victorian age, wrote A Christmas Carol in 1843 and published it with illustrations by John Leech. It was the first and most popular of five stories on Christmas time: A Christmas Carol (1843), The Chimes (1844), The Cricket on the Hearth (1845), The Battle of Life (1846), and The Haunted Man (1848). These five stories were published together in 1852 in Christmas Books. A Christmas Carol takes place in London, in a very typical English atmosphere of cold and fog. The main character is Ebenezer Scrooge, a miserly businessman who prefers money to everything else and lives alone, detesting all feelings and relationships with others. He does not appreciate the Christmas season at all, with its attendant feelings of joy and love of family. The story begins on Christmas Eve, the seventh anniversary of the death of Jacob Marley, Scrooge’s former business partner. During the night, Scrooge receives the visit of Marley’s ghost and the visits of three other spirits, the Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present, and Future. Marley—who represents Scrooge’s conscience and the conscience of humankind—wants to give to his partner what he did not have at the hour of his death, the possibility of redemption. By the end of Scrooge’s long night, he will come to learn the value of the holiday—and indeed, the value of life itself. Raffaella Cavalieri
332â•…â•… Dickens, Charles
Death in A Christmas Carol
Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol begins with these simple words: “Marley was dead: to begin with.” This is a strange beginning for a story about Christmas, but understanding death, or the threat of death, is vital to understanding Dickens’s ideas about life. The theme of death is first represented by the presence of Jacob Marley’s ghost, and later by the presence of three spirits. The impending death of the young and wholly innocent Tiny Tim and the fear Scrooge has of his own death also figure importantly in what will ultimately be Scrooge’s transformation. His encounters with death and the dead cause him to understand and respect the responsibility human beings have for one another. The complete title of Dickens’s story is A Christmas Carol in Prose, Being a Ghost Story of Christmas. Ghost stories were particularly popular in Victorian times and became part of the culture of the period. They developed from the gothic tale of terror but used more familiar settings and everyday situations to make the terror more credible. In the case of A Christmas Carol, Dickens sets an eerie scene with his descriptions of darkness, fog, and frost, in the weather and in Scrooge’s heart. It seems as if nothing lives in Scrooge; he is alone and he has left every kind of relationship to die. The weather will change only in the last chapter, after Scrooge’s redemption. Ghosts are used to help the main character understand that every man is the same, that there should be no class barriers and that the poor are people, too. The first one is Marley’s Ghost, who carries the story’s main message and represents humankind’s conscience: He speaks to Scrooge, but he refers to everybody. The second is the Ghost of Christmas Past, who shows how experiences make us who and what we are. The Ghost of Christmas Present demonstrates how many opportunities there are to care for the less fortunate, while the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come shows our fear of the future. The feared death of Tiny Tim is the one that touches the heart more than any other, and it is the one that makes Scrooge change definitively. In the 19th century, the child mortality rate was very high, and many of the original readers of this story might have suffered firsthand the loss of a child. Tiny
Tim’s possible death is in contrast with Scrooge’s. The boy’s short life will be mourned; he has brought much joy to those around him and he will be missed intensely. The man, on the other hand, will be missed by no one. In fact, the only people who will feel emotion at all upon his passing are his debtors, happy of the event that makes them free from their debt. He can’t believe that “he lay, in the dark empty house, with not a man, a woman, or a child, to say he was kind to me in this or that, and for the memory of one kind word I will be kind to him.” He asks the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come to show him tenderness connected with a death. The spirit brings him to Bob Cratchit’s house and lets him understand that the young and good Tim could die and that that occasion will be a tragedy for all. This prediction is the catalyst by which Scrooge changes. He fears the death of Tiny Tim and his own solitary death. He decides to honor Christmas and be a good man every day of the year, thinking about his less fortunate fellow men, helping Bob Cratchit’s family by giving a good wage to Bob and becoming a second father to Tiny Tim. Raffaella Cavalieri
Individual and Society in A Christmas Carol
An important theme in A Christmas Carol is the exploitation of the poor and children. The Victorian age was an era of technological progress but also one of extreme poverty and exploitation of factory workers. Men, women, and children worked in factories sometimes up to 16 hours a day, while the factory owners paid them very low wages. The gulf separating the rich from the poor was so deep that many contemporary novelists criticized the desperate situation of the working classes in their novels. Charles Dickens was perhaps the best-known example. At the age of 12, he was withdrawn from school and sent to work in a blacking factory in London to help his father, who had been imprisoned for debt. This experience lasted only a few months, but it influenced Dickens’s whole life, establishing his identification with the poor and oppressed and making him a consistent critic of these kinds of injustices. In A Christmas Carol in particular, Dickens wrote about economic disparity, love for fellow humans,
A Christmas Carolâ•…â•… 333 and charity. The central theme is that money does not make happiness, and that those who have it should give to the less fortunate. These were themes Dickens believed in very much, and he decided to write about them in a Christmas setting, because Christmas is a time during which people are more sensitive to generosity. Fred, Scrooge’s nephew (and also the character in whom we can find Dickens’s own feelings about Christmas), says: “I am sure I have always thought of Christmas time, when it has come round .╯.╯. as a good time: a kind, forgiving, charitable, pleasant time: the only time I know of, in the long calendar of the year, when men and women seem by one consent to open their shut-up hearts freely, and to think of people below them as if they really were fellow-passengers to the grave, and not another race of creatures bound on other journeys.” This sentiment highlights the conflict between individuals and the societies in which they live and demonstrates that, for Dickens, the collective is more important. The same theme can be found in the episode of the gentlemen who enters the countinghouse to ask Scrooge if he would like to offer something toward provisions for the poor and destitute. He reminds Scrooge of the poor who surround them, often without basic necessities. Scrooge simply replies by saying that there are prisons and workhouses for them, and he claims to help the poor by supporting this kind of establishment. When the gentleman says that many of them would rather die than live in such establishments, Scrooge responds that such deaths would eliminate the problem of the poor. As the Ghost of Christmas Past shows Scrooge his own experience when apprenticed to Fezziwig and the happiness the master was able to give him in those times, he understands his mistake. Previously, coming back home on Christmas Eve, Ebenezer Scrooge receives the visit of Jacob Marley’s ghost, who drags a long and heavy chain with symbolic objects such as cashboxes, keys, and padlocks: It symbolizes how the acts of our life come back to haunt us. Marley wears the chain he forged in his life. He represents not only Scrooge’s conscience but also the conscience of all humankind. Indeed, he brings this universal message: “It is required of every man, that the spirits within him
should walk abroad among his fellow-men, and travel far and wide; and if that spirit goes not forth in life, it is condemned to do so after death.” With this message, Marley reminds Scrooge that he is part of the human race and that experiencing that connection while a living, breathing soul is preferable to the hellish existence of Marley himself. Raffaella Cavalieri
Tradition in A Christmas Carol
A Christmas Carol is what Charles Dickens described as his “little Christmas Book.” The story was immediately successful and became one of the most popular and best-known Christmas stories of all time. Dickens wished his tale could be heard and shared by everybody, and by calling it a carol, he meant that it should spread joy and bring people together. He divided the story in five parts, and each part has a particular message for the reader and a general moral. In A Christmas Carol, we can find two main concepts about Christmas: the one held by Scrooge and that held by his nephew Fred, Bob Cratchit, and all the other good and poor people. As Fred enters the countinghouse to wish his uncle a Merry Christmas, Scrooge replies that Fred is poor and has no right to be merry at Christmas or any other time of the year. He goes on to complain about the season in general and to criticize the “idiots” who spread their cheer. Following the tradition of the family gathered round the fire, Fred invites his uncle for Christmas dinner, but Scrooge refuses. The gathering of family is one of the most important traditions of Christmas. When Scrooge meets the Ghost of Christmas Past, the spirit brings him back to a time in which he was a young boy and was at school. He was alone, while the other boys had already gone home for holidays. A door opens, and a little girl, Scrooge’s sister, comes in very happy, announcing to her brother that she is there to bring him home forever. This is clearly a very happy memory for Scrooge. The next past Christmas he sees is again an experience of his adolescence, when he was apprenticed to Fezziwig. His master was very good and made him feel happy. On this Christmas Eve, Fezziwig says to him, “No more work tonight. Christmas Eve,” and there is a party with dances, cake, cold roast, cold boiled, mince pies,
334â•…â•… Dickens, Charles and beer. Talking to the ghost, Scrooge admits he has been very bad with his poor clerk, Bob Cratchit. The most touching example of this Christmas tradition is Bob Cratchit and his family, poor but very happy to share what they have and to stay together even if their goose or their pudding is too small, even if their dresses are twice-turned and renewed with cheap ribbons. After dinner, they all draw around the fire and wish themselves a Merry Christmas. Dickens works to create the real traditions of Christmas time: all the children running along the streets into the snow to greet their married sisters, brothers, cousins, uncles, aunts, people going to church and chapel, and people carrying their dinners to the baker’s shop (because the houses of the poor were equipped with open fireplaces but not with ovens). The shops’ windows are radiant and full of things in their “Christmas dress.” The modern tradition of Christmas, its symbols and characteristics, were “invented” in the 19th century, so in reading Dickens’s descriptions, we can feel the real and universal Christmas atmosphere. At the end of A Christmas Carol, Scrooge achieves his redemption and makes this promise: “I will honour Christmas in my heart, and try to keep it all the year”—so that nobody knew better than Scrooge how to keep Christmas well. Raffaella Cavalieri
DICKENS, CHARLESâ•… David Copperf ieldâ•… (1849–1850)
David Copperfield can be considered the central work of Charles Dickens’s career as a novelist in several ways. It was written at the midpoint of his life as an author, and it soon became one of the best-loved texts of his repertoire and of Victorian culture. Into this semiautobiographical novel, Dickens incorporated many of the memories of his own unhappy boyhood. The story of David Copperfield’s passage from youth to maturity is narrated by the middleaged David, who is a professional writer. The book opens with details of David’s very early years with his widowed mother, who creates for him an idyllic childhood that is soon spoiled by her unfortunate second marriage to Mr. Murdstone. The boy is abused by his stepfather, who first sends
him to a school run by a sadistic master, Creakle, and then employs him as a child laborer in his London factory, an incident that reflects the major trauma of Dickens’s own childhood. Escaping London, David takes refuge at Dover with his Aunt Betsey, who gives him a stable upbringing and a good education. After a brief legal career in the employ of Mr. Wickfield, his aunt’s lawyer, David becomes a novelist. The novel largely focuses on David’s memories and reflections about traumas and deeply felt experiences in his life that teach him how to discipline his heart. Two tragedies that affect him deeply are his failed marriage to his first wife, Dora Spenlow, and the criminal behavior of his school chum, James Steerforth, who elopes with Emily, the niece of Mr. Peggotty, brother to David’s beloved nurse. David is also enlightened by triumphs in his life, such as the defeat of the villainous Uriah Heep. He finally achieves happiness with his second marriage to Agnes Wickfield, whose wisdom and goodness have inspired him since childhood. David Copperfield is groundbreaking both as fictional autobiography and as one of the first novels to trace in psychological detail the development of the child into an adult. It is a seminal work in the canon of 19th-century British and world literature. Diana Chlebek
Childhood in David Copperf ield
The portrayal of childhood that Charles Dickens presents in David Copperfield is striking for the accuracy and sympathy with which it renders the thoughts and emotions of a young boy as he grows into maturity. The work is one of the first in English literature in which a child’s perspective of his infancy and very early years of life is recaptured in autobiographical form, albeit through the retrospective narrative of his adult self. The book’s opening chapters are remarkable for the way they depict David’s child’s-eye view of his immediate environment, especially through the eccentricities of a toddler’s thought processes. The adult narrator also vividly recalls the emotional abandon that his childself shares with his young mother, who assumes the role of a delightful playmate rather than that of a dependable parent. Although David’s early years appear idyllic, the narrator emphasizes the insecure
David Copperf ield â•…â•… 335 foundation of his childhood by describing his anxieties about his dead father and his uncanny child’s observations about his mother’s frail and unstable nature. When David’s mother marries Mr. Murdstone, who becomes a cruel stepfather, the boy’s joyous early years turn into nightmares. The narrator’s description of Murdstone’s use of religious dogma as a pretext for abusing David emotionally and physically as part of the process of educating him reverberates with Dickens’s protest about society’s hypocrisy in its treatment of children. The destruction of David’s childhood continues when Murdstone sends him to a wretched school run by a sadistic master, Creakle, who teaches his students only bullying and fear of authority. At this point in the novel, when David’s mother dies and the boy is sent by Murdstone to work at his London factory, Dickens introduces autobiographical elements of his own life through the detailed description of David’s despair over his descent into working-class life and his lost opportunity to become an educated and accomplished man. David’s intense reaction to this darkest period of his childhood is portrayed with an accuracy that reflects Dickens’s deep insight about the special nature of children and their emotional needs. This episode also highlights a prominent social theme of Dickens’s novels that became the basis of a lifelong crusade—his vehement critique of Victorian society’s exploitation of juveniles as cheap labor. David’s helplessness and isolation are exacerbated in this miserable situation when he loses the support of his surrogate family, the Micawbers, who have provided him with companionship and love in addition to room and board during his factory labors in London. The narrator’s portrayal of the father, Wilkins Macawber, who drags his family with him into debtors’ prison, is based on another autobiographical aspect from Dickens’s life. Like the author’s own father, John Dickens, Micawber is an example of the immature and weak adult whose weaknesses and inadequate parenting prove to be so disruptive to family life and to the social order. David’s responses to the vicissitudes in this abysmal point of his childhood foretells the kind of determined and resourceful adult he will become.
When he resolves to make the arduous journey by foot from London to Dover to seek out his Aunt Betsey for her support and shelter, he makes great strides in the growth of his character. Once his aunt adopts him, changes his name, and provides him with good schooling and moral guidance, David’s childhood closes behind him. The rest of the novel focuses on his successful progress toward adulthood. Several of the children with whom David’s life is intertwined provide examples of characters who are destroyed by their broken childhoods, mainly because they lack proper parental guidance. Thus, little Emily, an orphan adopted by the Peggotty family, grows up to be an impulsive, weak-willed woman who is easily seduced by James Steerforth, David’s schoolboy hero. Steerforth, who is fatherless and has been indulged by an autocratic mother, becomes an egotistical and heedless adult who destroys both himself and the well-being of the Peggotty family through his uncontrolled passions. Dora Spenlow, David’s first wife, is also an orphan who has been raised and spoiled by two aunts. She enters marriage with David in a state of immature emotional development, ill-prepared to cope with the responsibilities of adulthood. Ultimately, it is David’s astute observations about the tribulations of his childhood and its depiction as a perilous journey to self-knowledge that make David Copperfield such a masterpiece. Among Dickens’s works, this novel contemplates at the deepest levels the place of the child in adult society, especially as it was conceived by Victorian culture. Diana Chlebek
Education in David Copperf ield
Charles Dickens approaches the theme of education in David Copperfield on several levels. He deals with the virtues and vices of methods of formal instruction that David undergoes in his early years. He also treats the theme more broadly through his portrayal of David’s maturity into a responsible adult who has learned from his life experiences. The early chapters focus on David’s childhood, especially on autobiographical events that mirror Dickens’s own experiences with schools and teachers. The author effectively criticizes the inhumane
336â•…â•… Dickens, Charles practices of the Victorian educational system, which he regarded as abusive of children and adolescents. David’s early years are idyllic, spent with a charming and indulgent mother who acts more like a playmate than a parent with him. After his mother remarries, his childhood freedom ends when he begins formal lessons with his cruel stepfather. Mr. Murdstone’s ideas about the innate evil of children, based on religious dogma, and his pedagogical method of beating knowledge into David mirrors practices of the time. The boy finds solace from his stepfather’s tyranny in the library left by his dead father. Here he finds refuge in absorbing works of escapist fiction and magical tales from previous centuries. He also discovers models of fantasy that educate his imagination and will help him become a successful writer. After David rebels against Murdstone’s abuse, he is sent to Salem House, a bleak academy run by Mr. Creakle, a sadistic schoolmaster with neither the knowledge nor temperament to teach. Instead, he applies the Murdstone philosophy and practical approach to educating his students—that of physical violence. David’s reminiscences about this academy stress that fear rather than knowledge was the basis of its instruction. He also underscores Creakle’s hypocrisy in managing the school, whereby he toadied to wealthy patrons and pupils and bullied his underpaid teachers and more impoverished students. Dickens had attended an institution like Salem House, and as an influential writer he supported social activists in Britain who sought to reform such schools and to extend access to education across all social classes. When David feels the greatest despair working in Murdstone’s London factory, he is most troubled by his lost educational opportunities, which he needs to better his social status. The desire to improve his situation compels him to escape factory life and seek shelter with his Aunt Betsey. The security he finds in his life with her is embodied in the excellent education she provides by sending him to Dr. Strong’s model school. David recalls it as an enlightened institution where students feel freedom rather than fear and where they sense their involvement in the school’s success. Strong’s progressive academy is the antithesis of Creakle’s outdated, prison-like institution. The contrast between these two schools corresponds to the
vast difference in the moral and emotional atmospheres of the two periods that comprise David’s early life—his servile, regressive existence under his tyrannous stepfather as opposed to his free, futuredirected life with his benevolent aunt. When David’s years of his formal education are over, the autobiographical narrative reflects on the life experiences that have given him self-knowledge and taught him to discipline his heart. David’s most important lesson in this regard is his impetuous, failed marriage to Dora, the spoiled wife who is unschooled in the practicalities of life. David learns a sense of responsibility from this experience, especially after her death. The despair and guilt he suffers as a consequence teach him the true value of his constant guide in life and his model of fortitude and understanding, Alice, who becomes his future wife. The tragedies of those closest to him are also lessons in the consequences of unbridled or wayward emotions. His schoolfriend Steerforth, who has always been indulged and never given moral guidance, lets his passions destroy himself and ruin others dear to David, such as Emily and the Peggotty family. When Agnes’s father, Mr. Wickfield, becomes absorbed in regrets over his past life, especially the loss of his wife, and succumbs to alcoholism and to the machinations of his evil clerk, Uriah Heep, he brings ruin upon himself and David’s aunt. Even Heep’s villainy is portrayed as a lust for power that stems from his education in the system of charitable schools that Dickens abhorred as a Victorian social evil. David Copperfield aligns many of Dickens’s ideas about education and views about childhood, especially his crusade for the rights of children. In this regard he played a pioneering role in English literature by incorporating this theme into his fiction. Diana Chlebek
Memory in David Copperf ield
David Copperfield illustrates the most distinctive features of Charles Dickens’s literary genius: his rendering of the forms and language of memory through its play with time, places, and persons. The work presents a remarkable literary exploration of issues surrounding the persistence of painful early memories in adult life and how these can be used constructively.
Great Expectations â•…â•… 337 Through its autobiographical form, the novel depicts a world initially perceived by the child through the filter of his adult memories. The representation of David’s earliest experiences illustrates the expressive nature connected with spontaneous remembering. Dickens presents an exploration of the operation of memory as it relates to the psychology of a growing boy who discovers how his values and life-defining choices have been shaped by his past. The beginning years of his life are recalled through direct sensory perception such as touch, smell, and taste. David recalls the texture of his nurse Peggotty’s skin; the rank odors associated with the school run by sadistic teachers that he is forced to endure; and, during the nightmare of his boyhood, the food choices he makes to survive his poverty as a child laborer in the London factory owned by Murdstone, his stepfather. Throughout his childhood tribulations, it is the idealized image of his young mother that sustains David, especially during his arduous journey from London to Dover to seek shelter with his Aunt Betsey. Once he settles into this new, secure life, he tries to discard all remembrances of his miserable youth. The later chapters of the novel present David’s recollection of his life as a story that focuses on characters he knows. Although the form of memory in this portion of the work is predominantly presented through these representational tales, the straightforward portrayal of autobiographical events is punctuated by crucial episodes in which the narrator revisits places or encounters characters who force him to reassess his present by reflecting on his past. His remembrances about the losses in his life, such as the deaths of his mother and companions, are closely linked to his desire to discover the source of what he describes as an old, strange discontent within himself. The persistence of painful recollections of his early life becomes an essential condition of David’s inner development as he seeks to understand the dilemmas of his adulthood. When he recalls his unsatisfactory marriage to his first spouse, Dora, her premature death, and his friend Steerforth’s elopement with Emily and ruination of the Peggotty family, David also ponders his guilt in these tragedies of his past and how they affect an understanding of his present life. Thus memory
becomes a moral faculty contributing to David’s self-understanding and self-determination, and it advances the development of his maturation. Memory acts as a crucial agent in the structure of the novel in other ways. While the direct retelling of the events of David’s life advances the story in a linear fashion, there is a circular pattern of thematic development signaled in his return to places that evoke recollections of the most strongly felt currents in his life. He returns to Blunderstone, his boyhood home, to recall the joy and the oppression he experienced there and how these deeply felt emotions still reside in his adult psyche. During visits to Yarmouth, David contemplates his memories of it both as a source of childhood happiness and as the tragic site of the deaths of his friends Steerforth and Ham Peggotty. The guilt, regret, and sorrow dividing these two recollections push David to measure changes in himself and in his present circumstances. Finally, his visits to Canterbury, the home of his future (second) wife, Agnes Wickfield, remind him of the constant inspiration and guidance she has provided throughout his life. Recent tragic events that befall his friends, especially Uriah Heep’s villainy toward the Wickfields, spark David to change his image of Agnes as a sister figure; instead he perceives her as his true and predestined soulmate. At the end of the novel, David is able to confront his memories and integrate them into his present life. He achieves a balance whereby he neither indulges in their oppressive and debilitating effects, as Agnes’s father does, nor distances and hardens himself against their humanizing evocations, as his Aunt Betsey does. David Copperfield demonstrates David’s ability, as novelist and autobiographer, to transform painful memories into art and to achieve a method of recovery from the self-doubt engendered by an anguished childhood. His creative use of lessons derived from his past becomes the basis of self-respect and integrated identity. Diana Chlebek
DICKENS, CHARLESâ•… Great Expectationsâ•… (1860–1861)
The narrator of Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations is the orphan Pip, who lives with his sister,
338â•…â•… Dickens, Charles Mrs. Joe, and her husband, Joe. Early in the story, Pip’s “expectations” of life are quite low. Mrs. Joe thinks little of him, and he can hope for no more in life than to be apprenticed to his brother-in-law. However, during the opening scene of the novel, Pip has an encounter that will change those expectations more than once during the course of his life. He meets the fearsome convict Magwitch, who is hiding in the graveyard, cold and hungry. Magwitch is a wanted man, bound for transport to Australia. Pip steals food for Magwitch, and the doomed man is forever grateful for this kindness. Shortly after this encounter, Pip begins to visit the home of the wealthy Miss Havisham to act as a playmate for her ward, Estella. Miss Havisham is a bitter woman, having been jilted at the altar many years before. She is raising Estella, quite literally, to break men’s hearts. Although Pip falls in love with Estella and thinks himself on the road to becoming a gentleman, he is eventually sent away. Pip’s expectations are then raised by a lawyer who arrives to tell him that he has a secret benefactor who wants to send him to London to be educated. Pip, of course, believes the benefactor is Miss Havisham, who has finally seen him for the raw gentleman material he thinks he is. During his time in London, he develops into a snobbish elitist who will have little to do with his former life. He then finds out, however, that his benefactor is none other than the criminal Magwitch, and he must eventually learn that status and wealth are not what are most important in life, but rather strength of character. All the characters in this novel, but especially Pip, learn the pain of rejection, face the cruelty life can dole out, and experience the power of hope. Jennifer McClinton-Temple
Hope in Great Expectations
In many ways, this novel is about hope and its power to sustain us in bleak times. Its title focuses our attention on what we as humans might expect from life. Our expectations, Dickens seems to be saying here, should be great; that they should also be realistic does not change that. The opening of the novel is a scene seemingly without hope. Set in a graveyard on a dreary Christmas Eve, the poor orphan Pip is crying by
the graves of his parents, whom he never knew. The scene is decidedly bleak, with a “dark flat wilderness beyond the churchyard” and the “distant savage lair from which the wind was rushing” that was the sea beyond that. However, Pip’s fateful graveyard meeting with the convict Magwitch breaks up this scene, and although Pip will not know it for many years to come, their encounter will give hope to them both. For Magwitch, hope is what drives him after he is transported to Australia. His having been sent there in the first place is a situation that might rob all hopeful thoughts from even the most optimistic soul. England, the only home he has ever known, has determined him unworthy to ever live there again, to ever call himself an Englishman, all for a crime he did not commit. During his time in Australia, however, Magwitch sustains himself with thoughts of Pip, whom he thinks of as his good Samaritan. When others mocked him, he would remind himself that while he might not be a gentleman himself, he was raising one across the sea. He later says to Pip, “This way I kep myself a going. And this way I held steady afore my mind that would for certain come one day and see my boy, and make myself known to him, on his own ground.” This hope is so strong in Magwitch that he defies the law in the end, returning to forbidden England so that he may fulfill his wish and reunite with Pip. In direct contrast to Magwitch’s life-sustaining hope, Miss Havisham has lost all hope. After being jilted at the altar, she spends her life mourning this loss, wearing her wedding clothes, stopping the clocks at the time of her abandonment, and watching her wedding cake harden and decay. She is a figure entirely without joy and without hope that life can and will change for the better. She was, as Pip’s friend Herbert explains, quite a desirable “catch” as a young woman, but her pain is so great and her pride so wounded that she cannot see beyond the past in order to hope for the future. Pip, too, is fixated, but his fixation is bound up entirely in hope. He loves Estella almost from the moment that he meets her, and despite her consistently poor treatment of him, he holds out hope that she will return his affection. After their first meeting, when he is left alone to explore the estate, he thinks “Estella was walking away from me
Great Expectations â•…â•… 339 even then,” and he notes the oppressive gloom of the nearby old brewery. But at the end of the same passage, he sees her “pass among the extinguished fires, and ascend some light iron stairs, and go out by a gallery high overhead, as if she were going out into the sky.” Pip believes that Miss Havisham is his secret benefactor and that he is being groomed to be the eventual husband of her ward Estella. Miss Havisham feeds this false hope, knowing that Pip has probably jumped to this conclusion. Estella, however, actually warns Pip against thinking this way, telling him, “You ridiculous boy, will you never take warning? Or do you kiss my hand in the same spirit in which I once let you kiss my cheek?” Even Pip himself knows that his pursuit defies logic, saying, “I knew to my sorrow, often and often, if not always, that I loved her against reason, against promise, against peace, against hope.” Despite this knowledge, his hope lives on—Until, that is, Estella is betrothed to Bentley Drummle, and Magwitch returns to confirm he is the benefactor. It is at this point in the novel that Dickens champions the pure hope of Magwitch over the false hope of Pip. Pip realizes that he is a grown man who has responsibilities, to Magwitch and to himself, and in the end, he does the right thing by trying to help Magwitch escape. Magwitch dies in the attempt, but he dies with the lifelong object of his hope attained. Pip has become a gentleman, and Pip treats him as only a son would. Jennifer McClinton-Temple
Rejection in Great Expectations
The story of the orphaned Pip, Great Expectations is peopled with characters who are rejected by their country, by society, and by those they love. These painful rejections have a variety of effects on the characters, however, with some of them learning and growing because of these experiences and others remaining in a state of rejection their entire lives. Pip begins the story as a rejected child. He never knew his parents and has been brought up “by hand” by his sister, Mrs. Joe, and her husband, Joe Gargery, the blacksmith. Mrs. Joe is a hard woman, almost comically so. Pip and Joe live their lives in a constant state of fear that they might incur her
considerable wrath. Mrs. Joe makes sure Pip knows how she feels about fate having delivered him to her doorstep, telling him that with hindsight, she would never have agreed to raise him. Feeling largely unwanted as a child and rarely knowing what he has done to engender his sister’s bad feelings have an effect on Pip’s character. Not only does he become quite sensitive to the rejection of others, but he is also convinced, at a very young age, that the world is inherently unfair. He says, “Within myself, I had sustained, from my babyhood, a perpetual conflict with injustice. I had known, from the time I could speak, that my sister, in her capricious and violent coercion, was unjust to me.” Thus, when Pip is rejected by Estella and Miss Havisham, a part of him feels the need to fight this injustice, to prove that he is worthy of love and admiration. It is this early rejection at such a young age from these three women, two of whom might have acted as surrogate mothers to Pip, which causes him, in turn, to reject those who actually do love him: Joe, Biddy, and later Magwitch. Pervasive rejection has left Pip feeling as though he must constantly prove his worthiness. Since Joe, Biddy, and Magwitch already think him very worthy, their affection does not seem worth his time. When Joe visits him in London, he thinks of the visit with nothing but embarrassment, saying, “If I could have kept him away by paying money, I certainly would have paid money.” His greatest fear is that Joe will cross paths with Bentley Drummle, because he fears Drummle’s scorn. Pip is conscious of the fact that he is being “weak” and “mean” in his rejection of Joe, but his fear of Drummle discovering his humble background overpowers him. Magwitch, especially, is a horror to Pip. When he discovers that Magwitch has been his benefactor all along, he does everything he can to hide from that truth, even asking the lawyer Jaggers whether or not there might be another benefactor in addition to the convict. Discovering that Miss Havisham has never been his supporter and that he was never intended for Estella’s hand takes him back to his childish state of rejection all over again. He has spent years believing that despite their outward signs to him, Miss Havisham and Estella secretly admired him.
340â•…â•… Dickens, Charles To learn that that was only in his imagination is a serious blow. Magwitch, too, has been gravely wounded by rejection. Sent away by his country for a crime he did not commit, told he must never return to England in his lifetime, Magwitch has experienced what might be considered a mass rejection—the rejection of his fellow English. He does well in Australia, however, and uses his newfound wealth to create an English gentleman, Pip, who will be accepted, not rejected, by the society that has limited them both so severely. It is Miss Havisham, though, who experiences that greatest rejection of all. Left at the altar by a man she thought loved her, she spends her life in mourning, literally surrounded by the symbols of her rejection. She hardens her heart and passes this on to Estella, her living instrument of revenge. When she realizes, however, what she has done, and that Estella is not just hard and cold to others but hard and cold to her as well, she repents. For her, it is too late, as she is at the end of her life. But for Pip the lesson comes just in time. He realizes that he has spent his life yearning for affection from those who cannot give it while ignoring those who offer it freely. He returns to Magwitch to help him escape, and although Magwitch dies in the attempt, he dies knowing that he is accepted and loved by his “second son.” Jennifer McClinton-Temple
Social Class in Great Expectations
Charles Dickens, more than any other writer of the 19th century, is known for his close attention to social concerns, especially the welfare of children. Many of his novels address issues of social inequality, child labor, and the living and working conditions of the poor. In Great Expectations, Dickens’s treatment of social class is more subtle than it is in, for instance, Oliver Twist, A Christmas Carol, or Bleak House. Here he gives us Pip, an orphan who is not poor but whose options are limited by his place and station in life. Pip is granted unexpected wealth by one of the lowest of the low in English society, Magwitch, a criminal virtually born into a criminal state. While Pip’s character goes downhill as his fortunes go up, Magwitch’s behavior is contrasted
with the behavior of the upper-class Miss Havisham and her despicable relatives. Dickens seems to be saying here that class does not determine character and that, in fact, the social inequalities inherent in English society serve no one well, not the poor and not the rich. The most honorable characters in the novel— Joe, Herbert and Matthew Pocket, and Biddy—care nothing for their own status and wealth. Joe and Biddy may have been born into relatively low stations in life and therefore have little chance of rising higher. But they are both extraordinarily kindhearted people, focused outward, helping others, rather than focused inward, helping themselves. The Pockets are another matter entirely. Matthew Pocket, born on the periphery of a wealthy family, chooses not to compromise himself by kowtowing to his rich cousin, Miss Havisham, as the rest of his family does. The expectations that Joe, Biddy, and the Pockets have from life are determined not by the class in which they were born but, rather, by where they find contentment and happiness. The least honorable characters in the novel— Miss Havisham and her relatives, Mr. Pumblechook, and Bentley Drummle—demonstrate that wealth and status do not make people kind or happy or worthy of praise. They have been given opportunities in life, to be sure, and from life they have very great expectations, but because they do not feel they must contribute anything of their own to achieve those expectations, they are empty shells, incapable of true feeling. It is the “in-between” characters in the novel, those whose honor and expectations fluctuate, that Dickens uses to make his strongest statements about social class. Magwitch is born into what might be called a criminal class. Pip asks him what he was “brought up to be,” and Magwitch answers “a warmint, dear boy” as though that were a profession. He remembers little of his early life but says his first memory was of “a thieving turnips for my living.” He remembers no parents, no home, no kindness or warmth. He says of those who jailed him early on in life, “They always went on agen me about the Devil. But what the Devil was I to do? I must put something into my stomach, mustn’t I?” This is Dickens’s point: English society gave no chance to
Oliver Twistâ•…â•… 341 young Magwitch; he was born to have no expectations at all. When Pip shows him kindness in the churchyard, he responds by devoting his life to its repayment. The degradation that was Magwitch’s life has not destroyed his character, while the high privilege that was Miss Havisham’s life did nothing to build hers. She spends her life bent on revenge for one act of cruelty done to her. Pip and Estella are perhaps the most interesting characters in the novel in terms of how social class forms their respective characters. Both are rescued from the limitations into which they have been born. Estella, presumably, would have spent her life as a thief and a criminal, much as her father did. Mr. Jaggers places her with Miss Havisham in the hope that she will have a better life, but Miss Havisham raises her without values, demonstrating that class and character do not go hand in hand. Pip is raised from a working-class life into the life of a London gentleman. But this idle, responsibility-free life hurts him, damping the goodness inherent in him. When Magwitch says, “I lived rough, that you should live smooth; I worked hard, so that you should be above work,” he does not realize that this removal from all responsibility, from all obligation, has been bad for Pip. Ironically, when he realizes that Magwitch is his responsibility, he comes back to himself, to the good person that he is, and he does the right thing. For Dickens, the prevailing notion in 19th-century England of virtue and good character depending on social class was inherently wrong. The class one is born into does not determine character, and to suggest that it does is morally wrong. Jennifer McClinton-Temple
DICKENS, CHARLESâ•… Oliver Twistâ•… (1837–1839)
Charles Dickens’s novel Oliver Twist stands out as a superb exploration of the effects of institutions upon people, especially the working-class children who were among the most vulnerable groups in early 19th-century British society. It was published serially in 1837–39 when the tragic effects of Britain’s Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 were calling forth the loudest protests from the poor and their supporters.
The novel’s plot is based on the story of Oliver Twist, a child of unknown parentage, born in a workhouse and brought up under cruel conditions of deprivation. After an unhappy apprenticeship, Oliver escapes to London and falls in with a gang of child thieves headed by Fagin, a devious old criminal who tries to convert Oliver into a thief. Other notorious members of the group are the Artful Dodger; Bill Sykes; and Bill’s mistress, Nancy. Temporarily rescued by the kindly Mr. Brownlow, Oliver is snatched by the gang at the orders of Fagin. Forced to go on a burglary heist with Sykes, Oliver is wounded and nursed by the benevolent Mrs. Maylie and her ward, Rose. Nancy tells Rose about Monks’s scheme to obliterate Oliver’s parentage, and Sykes murders Nancy for her betrayal. Sykes accidentally hangs himself when a mob pursues him. Fagin is executed and the gang rounded up. Monks is pursued and confesses that he is half brother to Oliver, whom he has tried to ruin in order to inherit their father’s entire property; he eventually dies abroad in prison. Rose is revealed as the sister of Oliver’s mother, and Oliver himself is adopted by Mr. Brownlow. Dickens’s treatment of the themes of childhood, survival, and work are among his greatest accomplishments in this work. Oliver Twist was the first British novel to focus on the character of a child and to give the English pauper child a voice. It thus has a special status in the history of British literature and culture. Diana Chlebek
Childhood in Oliver Twist
In Oliver Twist, Charles Dickens offers a particularly sympathetic insight into the condition of childhood by focusing his story on the tribulations of a young pauper boy struggling to survive in early Victorian England. The novel’s melodramatic opening, with its shocking description of Oliver’s traumatic birth in a workhouse where his mother has taken refuge and where she dies after bearing her illegitimate son, begins the nightmare of abandonment, exploitation, and terror that constitute the orphan’s early life. Even the hero’s name, “Oliver Twist,” becomes a symbol of his anonymity and isolation from society since it is randomly assigned to this orphan of unknown origins by inhumane workhouse
342â•…â•… Dickens, Charles authorities who regard the pauper children under their protection as mere sources of labor, at best, and as expendable burdens on the state, at worst. Victorian culture is often noted for nurturing childhood as a special stage of human development, particularly through its depictions of angelic children in works of literature and art that were aimed to accommodate the tastes of the English middle and upper classes. Dickens shocked these same audiences when Oliver Twist portrayed the grim realities of how poverty-stricken and abandoned children from the lower orders of society were victimized and abused by government institutions, such as the workhouse, that were supposed to care for them or, at the least, give them a livelihood. An early incident in Oliver’s life that illustrates such brutal treatment by his caretakers has become one of the most famous scenes in the novel. When he is chosen by the other children at dinnertime to be their representative to ask for more rations from the workhouse authorities, the master responds to the orphan’s piteous request, “Please, sir, I want some more,” by viciously beating Oliver and throwing him into solitary confinement. As further punishment for his audacity in pleading for more food on behalf of himself and his equally starving companions, Oliver is ejected from the workhouse and farmed out as a laborer through a process that handles him like a felon. Dickens deliberately uses such an exaggerated scenario to underscore the harmful roles played by adults who oversee the upbringing of vulnerable children left to the care of the state. For it is through abuse from figures of authority such as Bumble the beadle, who assists at Oliver’s workhouse “trial,” and the undertaker Sowerberry, who exploits him as a laborer, that the orphan flees to London, where he ends up in a gang of child thieves headed by the evil criminal Fagin. The depictions of corrupted childhoods played out against a grim urban setting that Dickens presents at this stage of Oliver’s story were based on the real-life experiences of young felons whom the author had observed during his early career as a reporter at trials in the London courts. When the orphan is introduced into Fagin’s gang, the young members who are presented as models to follow are the Artful Dodger, a streetwise urchin of Oliver’s
age, and Nancy, a teenage prostitute whom Fagin has given as a mistress to Bill Sikes, a brutal thief and colleague of Fagin’s. Having been transformed into hardened criminals at an early age by evil adults who have lured them off the city streets, these two young characters come to represent a whole class of children who have been robbed of their young innocence. Dickens presents them both as prematurely adult, especially the Dodger, who, with his pipe and outsized man’s clothes, appears almost grotesque. By contrast, Oliver’s childish purity is portrayed as a mantle of security that ultimately protects him from this tragic childhood of corruption and crime on the London streets that traps the Dodger, Nancy, and other young paupers. Oliver’s young innocence ultimately helps to save him, for it is this aspect of his character that attracts the sympathies of Mr. Brownlow and of the Maylie family, all of whom he is forced to rob by Fagin’s orders. Nancy is also moved by the orphan’s vulnerability so that, at the cost of her own life, she reveals to these benefactors that the child is being forced into a criminal life under the orders of his evil stepbrother Monks, who wants to him disinherited. By a series of coincidences, Oliver is revealed to be related and connected with these families, and thus the solution to the mystery of his birth and origins becomes the critical factor that works to bring him both the care of his true, “good” family and the material well-being afforded through the recovery of his inheritance. Ultimately, it was Dickens’s memories of his own deprived childhood as well as his keen observations of Victorian culture that fueled Oliver Twist’s artistry and its passionate call for reform in the treatment of that most neglected sector of 19th-century British society—the child pauper. Diana Chlebek
Survival in Oliver Twist
Charles Dickens approaches the theme of survival in Oliver Twist from several perspectives. In his portrayal of pauperism in Victorian England and its brutalizing effects, he strives to expose a shocking reality to his middle-class readers. He reveals that dire social conditions in Britain have forced its population of laboring poor, particularly children, to
Oliver Twistâ•…â•… 343 seek refuge from starvation and physical abuse by escaping into an underworld of crime and violence. Oliver’s flight from the horrors of the workhouse and the corruption of Fagin’s gang, and his eventual ascension to his rightful social role and inheritance is presented as an uplifting story of reclamation and progress. However, even as Dickens underscores the exceptional nature of Oliver’s happy fate, he emphasizes to his middle-class audience the necessity of saving the vast majority of orphans who, like Nancy, the Artful Dodger or Bill Sykes, must resort to a criminal life in order to survive. In the first section of the novel, which describes the wretched world of the workhouse, Dickens focuses on Oliver’s physical endurance of the institution’s brutalities. The boy’s passage from infancy to childhood is portrayed as a miracle of withstanding the harsh ministrations of adult caretakers. The author attacks the hypocrisy of British society’s institutionalized charity through his ironic description of the workhouse and its officials, who, instead of providing succor to the poor, impose on them a vicious test of survival of the fittest. Oliver’s reactions to deprivation and abuse, such as his request for more food on behalf of the orphans and his confrontation of those who insult his parentage, reveal an inner core of moral courage that help him escape an existence that drives others to despair and death. Dickens does emphasize that aspects of Oliver’s inherited gentility, manifested in his attractive appearance and gentle manners, help to save him since others take pity upon him. Nonetheless, it is the boy’s resolve to defy his oppressors and seek another life that demonstrates he is not ground down by the economic philosophers who have engineered the workhouse system as a means of subduing the pauper class. It is in the novel’s portrayal of London’s underworld that the theme of survival is most thoroughly explored. Oliver encounters young characters who represent alternative corrupted childhoods that may also entrap the young hero’s body and soul. The Artful Dodger, who exploits the boy’s trust and entices him into Fagin’s gang, has himself survived the dangers of London’s street life by assuming the airs, appearance, and craftiness of an adult criminal. Dodger thus foregoes the innocence of childhood
and also the possibility of spiritual growth and moral development. Nancy, another gang member, has survived poverty and abuse as a child by succumbing to adult corruptors who train her in theft and prostitution. She therefore seems to be irrevocably entrapped within their criminal caste. However, she is inspired by Oliver’s innocent vulnerability and goodness to eventually challenge the processes of corruption driven by evildoers like Fagin and Monks, Oliver’s half brother, who seek to obliterate the child’s true identity and steal his rightful inheritance. Nancy foregoes her own physical survival when she decides to save the orphan after discovering that he is being forced to assist in the gang’s house robberies. When she reveals to Oliver’s benefactors that Fagin and Monks intend to make the boy a criminal, her betrayal of the gang’s plans becomes a death sentence, but by sacrificing her life to rescue Oliver from corruption, she ensures her spiritual salvation. Nonetheless, the fact that Nancy is not allowed to survive, despite her noble deed, lends force to Dickens’s message to his audience that women like her and victimized youths like those of Fagin’s gangs must be saved from a criminal culture spawned by social forces based on irresponsible and vicious materialism. Ultimately, Dickens presents Oliver’s story not only as an adventure of survival but also as a journey of progress that leads the boy to the reclamation of his true heritage and takes the form of genteel class identity and material inheritance. Thus, Oliver Twist is not merely a narrative of human endurance whereby the author uses the figure of the pauper orphan as a touchstone for society’s lack of charity and neglect for its weakest members. The novel offers hope that the power of innocence and purity, as embodied in the child hero, can survive intact and may even act as an agent of resistance against the morally bankrupt forces that threaten to erode Victorian society. Diana Chlebek
Work in Oliver Twist
By focusing on the lives of the working poor in Oliver Twist, Charles Dickens grapples with a theme that represents the introduction of a controversial contemporary issue into Victorian fiction. Through
344â•…â•… Dickens, Charles the novel’s realistic portrayal of pauperism and especially the exploitation of abandoned orphans by state authorities and criminals, Dickens explores the brutal effects of England’s industrialization and harsh economic policies on its most vulnerable members. By making such a topic the focal point of the social commentary in his fiction, he sought to pique the public’s interest in reforming the conditions that bred poverty and crime in Victorian society. The specific target of the work’s satirical critique was the Poor Law of 1834, which isolated paupers from the rest of English society by forcing them to labor and eke out a bare existence in a workhouse. This institutionalization of the working poor was intended to remedy problems caused by an exploding population of unemployed and unemployable citizens. Instead, it became one of the most abusive social measures of 19th-century Britain. The workhouse in Oliver Twist becomes a symbol of industrial society’s worst evils, particularly its destruction of the bonds of human relationships and sympathies. Dickens depicts how the process of workhousing paupers breaks up families and isolates an entire stratum of society whose members are exploited for their labor and treated as expendable commodities. Oliver Twist’s status as an orphan and illegitimate child makes him especially vulnerable to abuse within the workhouse and in society at large. Born just as his mother dies, he is unprotected and anonymous, a laboring ward of the state, whose representative Bumble, the warehouse beadle, gives him a name picked at random. Like other workhouse inmates, Oliver loses ties to family and community, and he becomes the innocent victim of a government solution to the problem of a so-called surplus underclass. Children become especially vulnerable to those aspects of the workhouse system that Dickens considered the most reprehensible—lack of charity and corrupt operation. Such evils are personified in Bumble, who starves the wards for his own gain when he withholds and pockets part of their rations. In a crucial episode, Oliver becomes the voice for his fellow inmates when he is chosen by them to ask Bumble for more food. The beadle’s reaction to Oliver’s begging mirrors society’s attitude toward its destitute working class. The boy’s request for sustenance, like his poverty, is regarded as
criminal; as punishment, he is thrown into another form of oppressive labor—bonded apprenticeship to the local undertaker, Mr. Sowerberry. Dickens stresses that it is the innate innocence projected by Oliver’s gentle manners and appearance that induces Sowerberry to employ him as a funeral attendant. These qualities save the boy from being forced into the dreaded work of chimney sweeping, a brutal occupation that maimed and killed thousands of child laborers in England during this period. When Oliver escapes from his abusive employment and heads for London, he becomes vulnerable to a worse form of labor bondage that ensnared many paupers in the Victorian period, especially children and women. He is lured into an urban gang of thieves by the Artful Dodger, a youth who has been hardened in appearance and character by his corrupt life and work as a criminal. The values of honest labor and its rewards, which were already horribly subverted by the workhouse system, are completely turned upside-down in the training school for juvenile thieves operated by Fagin, who is a fence and pimp. Oliver is presented with a charade in which the theft of another’s possessions is enacted as a useful and skillful occupation. Fagin deceives his juvenile gang into believing that, by profiting him, their thievery will help them all. Thus, in a twisted sense, their criminal work seems justifiable. His exploitation of these destitute boys is as heinous as Beadle Bumble’s abusive and corrupted management of the workhouse, which has been spawned by the twisted economic logic of the Poor Law. Fagin’s evil scheme to entrap Oliver into a lifelong occupation as a criminal is eventually thwarted by those who are moved by the boy’s innocence. Once his true identity is revealed, Oliver regains his rightful status and occupation in society as a gentleman’s son. Dickens’s narrative of Oliver’s salvation from a life of miserable servitude as an impoverished laborer or as a criminal had a powerful effect on a reading public who identified with this hero from a genteel background. Oliver Twist became the first in a succession of Dickens’s novels that influenced the shaping of social reforms to improve life for the British working class. Diana Chlebek
A Tale of Two Citiesâ•…â•… 345
DICKENS, CHARLESâ•… A Tale of Two Citiesâ•… (1859)
A Tale of Two Cities was first published in 1859, 70 years after the eruption of the French Revolution with the storming of the Bastille. The story is set during the years leading up to the Revolution and the ensuing Reign of Terror. It follows the Revolution’s progression as the downtrodden peasants unite to overthrow their oppressors, only to become tyrants themselves. It is possible to see the story as cautionary, since for years after the Revolution, many feared the same could happen in Britain. The tale is indeed one of two cities, as the chapters alternate between Paris and London. At the center of the narrative are Lucie Manette, a beautiful and virtuous young woman; her father, who has been wrongfully imprisoned in the Bastille; and her two suitors, Charles Darnay and Sydney Carton, who happen to be nearly physically identical though antithetical in character. Also crucial to the story are Miss Pross, Lucie’s loyal housekeeper; Madame Defarge, a ruthless revolutionary; and the marquis Evrémonde, who represents the brutality of the ancien régime. Throughout the novel, Dickens explores themes such as fate, violence, and oppression. A Tale of Two Cities is one of Dickens’s two historical novels (Barnaby Rudge is the other). It combines the interest of the explosive political setting with a typical Dickensian strength of characterization that makes the story, though historically removed, seem relevant to the reader. Dickens’s ability to produce foul villains is only matched by his capacity to bring to life characters whose integrity and goodness raise them above their difficult circumstances. Maria Gonzalez-Posse
Fate in A Tale of Two Cities
The inevitability of the French Revolution is suggested from the very first chapter of A Tale of Two Cities. The moral corruption of the aristocracy is evidenced in acts of ludicrous tyranny, such as “sentencing a youth to have his hands cut off, his tongue torn out with pincers, and his body burned alive, because he had not kneeled down in the rain to do honour to a dirty procession of monks which passed
within his view.” With such injustices occurring routinely, France seems irrevocably set on a course toward revolt as if fate itself had designed it. France’s fate is even imprinted on the landscape, whose trees are “marked by the Woodman, Fate,” merely waiting to be resurrected as guillotines. Every character seems trapped in a fated course of action, unable or unwilling to modify it. The marquis Evrémonde, cruel and ruthless, scoffs at his nephew’s attempt to change his fate by leaving the life of wealth he has inherited. “My friend, I will die, perpetuating the system under which I have lived,” he tells him, further counseling him to “accept [his] natural destiny.” Disregarding his uncle’s advice, Charles leaves France for England to work as a teacher and lead a simple and blameless life. Despite all his efforts, fate catches up with Charles Darnay. Accused of treason against the English Crown, he meets and falls in love with Lucie Mannette. Lucie, as it turns out, is the daughter of Dr. Mannette, who was imprisoned by Charles’s father and uncle when they suspected he might report the murder and rape that he was called to treat. Charles is forced to face his past as he becomes engaged to the daughter of the man whom his ancestors have so seriously injured. Fate’s games with Darnay do not end there, however, as he is finally compelled to return to France when Gabelle, the man who had been in charge of his estate in France, is imprisoned for his association with the Evrémonde estate and begs him to come to his rescue. Fate proves stronger than Darnay’s attempts to escape his past, and he is forced to return to France to face the consequences of the sins of his fathers. The Revolutionaries in France are also moved by fate. This is particularly the case with Madame Defarge, whose bloodthirsty desire for revenge is motivated by the rape of her sister and murder of her brother at the hands of the brothers Evrémonde. The terrible acts of violence that she witnessed as a child determine her course of action as a woman. In order to complete her revenge, Madame Defarge acquires the power to control the destinies of others. Her knitting, a seemingly benevolent and harmless activity that raises images of domestic warmth and
346â•…â•… Dickens, Charles feminine propriety, is actually her way of keeping a record of antirevolutionary targets. She performs this activity “with the steadfastness of Fate,” sealing the tragic fates of those whose names she weaves into her pattern. In typical Dickensian style, A Tale of Two Cities is full of fateful coincidences. Even as we are reminded of the scale of London and Paris, the world becomes small when characters continuously reunite. Characters from different social classes, occupations, and geographical locations all come together in the end to affect each other’s destinies. Such is the case with Sydney Carton, for instance, who twice appears to save Charles Darnay from death, first in England and then in France. Incidentally, the physical similarity that allows Carton to save Darnay on both occasions seems to him like a mockery of fate, a reminder of what he might have been were he born under different circumstances. By rescuing Darnay for the second time, however, Carton does not allow himself to become a victim of fate. Unable to resign himself to a meaningless life, he sacrifices himself for the sake of Lucie and her lover, telling himself, “It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done.” Fate is an intractable force in A Tale of Two Cities. It works in mysterious ways to reveal the interconnectedness of people’s destinies and shows that no man has complete control over his destiny. At the same time, however, indiscriminately submitting to fate is presented as a dangerous choice, one that in this case leads to the continuation of a terrible cycle of violence. The most admirable characters in A Tale of Two Cities are those who know when it is best to face their fate and when to do something to change its course. Marie Gonzales-Posse
Heroism in A Tale of Two Cities
Almost every character with whom we are encouraged to sympathize in A Tale of Two Cities performs, throughout the course of the novel, some act of heroism. Dr. Manette is drawn into heroism when he is picked up by the Evrémonde brothers to give medical assistance to the brother and sister they have seriously injured. The doctor further acquits himself honorably in his staunch refusal to accept payment
from them, raising the Evrémondes’ suspicions against him and resulting in his incarceration in the Bastille in order to guarantee his silence. Charles Darnay makes the heroic decision to renounce the life of comfort and luxury he would enjoy as part of the corrupt French nobility to live a simple life as a tutor in England. He demonstrates the same integrity in returning to France to help free Gabelle when he is imprisoned by French Revolutionaries. The men are not the only heroic characters in the novel. There is heroism in Lucie’s quiet stoicism as she stands before her husband’s prison every day in the hope of allowing him to catch a glimpse of her so he can retain his sanity. More dramatically, perhaps, Miss Pross is ultimately responsible for eliminating the villainous Madame Defarge, not through mindless violence but in a courageous demonstration of her love and loyalty for the Manette family. The novel’s most outstanding act of heroism, however, is Sydney Carton’s final sacrifice when he decides to take Darnay’s place at the guillotine at the end of the novel. Even though the conclusion may be surprising, in retrospect we can see that it has been foreshadowed. Not only has Carton declared to Lucie that he would be willing to sacrifice anything for her, but he more explicitly declares that she should think of him as “a man who would give his life, to keep a life you love beside you!” Furthermore, Carton’s rescue of Darnay in France in many ways resembles his first intervention in England. In both instances, Carton comes to the aid of Darnay (who is being wrongfully accused) and uses their physical resemblance to bring about his liberation. Sydney Carton is an unlikely hero by any definition. If anything, we might be tempted to think of him as an antihero. He drinks himself to stupor on a regular basis, and he is generally depressive, apathetic, and irresponsible. Some readers have even seen him as a tragic hero in the sense that he is a brooding individual, socially outcast and both driven and tormented by an impossible love. His existence has no meaning outside of his love for Lucie Manette. The conclusion of the novel, however, allows his lack of commitment to himself to become a virtue when it is used in service of protecting Lucie’s happiness and the unity of the Manette circle.
A Tale of Two Citiesâ•…â•… 347 Unlike the other characters in the novel who are left behind to enjoy the rewards of their heroic actions, Carton must paradoxically find the meaning of his life in his death. Not only does he sacrifice himself for Lucie, but he finally experiences a profound connection with another human being when he is able to bring comfort to the final moments of the seamstress who is sent to the guillotine before him. The heroism of the English protagonists of the story stands in clear contrast to the dog-eat-dog world of the French Revolution. While both can arguably be said to be moved by laudable motives, such as a desire to overturn oppression and avenge or protect their loved ones, their actions take entirely different shapes. Where the French heroism is expressed in a too-ready willingness to sacrifice others, the English are heroic in that they sacrifice only themselves. Where the French engage in savage slaughter, the English are represented as being moved by a civilized sense of chivalry. The point is not that the English are morally superior to the French, but that violence and oppression only lead to more of the same. Indeed, contemporary English readers may have read A Tale of Two Cities as a cautionary tale that exposes the dangers to be found in the violence of lawlessness and finds heroism instead in restraint, duty, and honor. Marie Gonzalez-Posse
V iolence in A Tale of Two Cities
A Tale of Two Cities spares no detail when it comes to the horrors of the French Revolution and the vile abuses leading up to them. The novel presents two sources of violence, the heartless and reckless disdain of the nobility and the base savagery of the rebelling masses responding to it. While a great part of the novel is spent detailing the violence surrounding the storming of the Bastille and the beginnings of the Reign of Terror, the narrative is punctuated by reminders of the kind of violent abuses that instigated this anger in the first place. Wine functions as a symbol for the shedding of blood throughout the novel. One of the very first scenes we see set in France is the breaking of a cask of wine and the peoples’ response to it. As the contents of the cask spill onto the ground, people scurry to quench their thirst with the red fluid. What starts
as a game, however, soon turns into grim omen when a man uses the wine to write “BLOOD” on a wall with his finger, and the narrator comments on how other streets will soon be stained. The wine, we discover, has stained not only the ground but also “many hands.” Some leave the street with winesmeared mouths, a mark clearly symbolic of their willingness to regress to savage, animalistic impulse. When the executions begin, the guillotine is presented as a thirsty machine that has been used so many times that it, as well as the ground beneath it, has become, a disturbing red. Like a vampire, it feeds on the inmates of the prisons who are sacrificed to “slake her devouring thirst.” The same tendencies toward violence in the mob are displayed in their dance of the Carmagnole, which Lucie witnesses one day when she goes to stand in front of the prison to be seen by Darnay. There she sees hundreds of people “dancing like five thousand demons” and “keeping a ferocious time that was like a gnashing of teeth in unison.” In the mob, people seem to lose their individuality, becoming part of a large, unstoppable, whirling motion. “No fight could have been as terrible as this dance,” the narrator comments, because it is a “fallen sport”—“a something, once innocent, delivered over to all devilry.” What is so very frightening about the dance, it seems, is its transformative and dehumanizing power. Although Dickens is clearly critical of this violence, he also allows us to understand the history from which it springs. The novel actually begins and ends with a description of the nobility’s abuses of the poor. The violence of the ancien régime is symbolically represented in the character of the Marquis Evrémonde. Early in the novel, we witness him heartlessly running over an innocent child with his carriage and killing him, only to respond “with the air of a gentleman who has accidentally broken some common thing, and had paid for it, and could afford to pay for it.” Toward the end of the novel, we also learn the reason behind Madame Defarge’s thirst for revenge as it turns out that she was the peasant girl whose family had been grievously mistreated (including rape and murder) by the brothers Evrémonde.
348â•…â•… Dickinson, Emily Revealing the identity of Madame Defarge may help us understand her impulse for revenge, but it does not go as far as inspiring sympathy. It is impossible to feel for her as she plots her final attack on Lucie and her child and she listens to Jacques Three gloating at the notion of presenting the child to the guillotine. But the novel restores the moral right through Madame Defarge’s encounter with Miss Pross. The two women seem to represent competing ideas of feminine strength: Both are fighting for loved ones, but they use different weapons. Madame Defarge has put away her knitting and arrives with a pistol in her bosom and a sharpened dagger at her waist, while Miss Pross’s only weapon is her courage and her love. She prevents Madame Defarge from storming into Lucie’s room, and in the struggle, Madame Defarge is shot with her own pistol, the final “crash” leaving Miss Pross permanently deaf. Madame Defarge dies as a result of her own violence. Miss Pross’s valiant effort, along with Carton’s sacrifice as he trades places with Darnay at the guillotine, are presented as the only acts that are capable of interrupting the cycle of violence. As the narrator concludes, “Sow the same seed of rapacious license and oppression over again, and it will surely yield the same fruit according to its kind.” Maria Gonzalez-Posse
DICKINSON, EMILYâ•… poemsâ•… (1830– 1886)
Despite not achieving fame in her lifetime, the discovery and release of more than 1,500 poems since her death in 1886 has meant that Emily Dickinson is now considered one of the greatest American poets. Unlike her contemporaries, such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Walt Whitman, Dickinson was not overtly concerned with the making of a specifically American literature. Upon first glance, her poems have the same kind of universal appeal as Shakespeare’s plays; they are concerned with life, death, nature, spirituality, and, perhaps surprisingly to some readers, love and hope. So key are these themes that they are often directly named in her poems, suitably capitalized, and frequently personified.
Yet Dickinson’s poems also tell a personal story. In them we find a response to the solemn Calvinist upbringing she had had in Amherst, Massachusetts, where she was born in 1830. Her poems are austere and restrained in their condensation, but they are also rebellious against such restraint in their content. Just as Dickinson resisted the radical Puritan revivals that swept the New England states in the 19th century, so too do her poems favor human experience over religious testimony, with nature providing signs and metaphors by which to interpret behavior and emotions. Though her poems are almost always introspective and illustrative of the long periods of reclusion and despair that Dickinson experienced, their continual appeal to observable nature over an invisible God for enlightenment makes her poetry transcendental in character, compelling the modern reader to consider her in relation to Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, and Nathaniel Hawthorne. Sarah Barnsley
Death in the Poems of Emily Dickinson
Death imagery permeates so many of Emily Dickinson’s poems that it seems as if she is making a statement that it is never too far from human consciousness. Death is inevitable and close to all—so close that one poem’s speaker claims to feel a funeral in her brain and mourners treading through her mind, with the beating drum of the service and the creaking of a coffin being carried off for burial (“I felt a Funeral, in my Brain”). A review of the contents of first lines confirms the extent of this striking readiness to confront and interrogate death, yielding an unsettling array of voices that seem to be speaking from both inside and beyond the grave itself with startling familiarity with the afterlife: “I died for Beauty” utters one voice; “I heard a Fly buzz— when I died” testifies another; “I went to Heaven” says another voice, as if likening the passage of death with all the banality of an account of making a routine journey. In “Because I could not stop for Death,” Death is personified as a kindly gentleman passing by the living in a carriage, stopping to pick up the passenger, who narrates the poem with all the civility of a friendly neighbor.
poemsâ•…â•… 349 The theme of death informs the highly individual structure of Dickinson’s poems. Their often stark brevity and heavily condensed lines make them reminiscent of epitaphs from a headstone, particularly acute in poems that convey a sense of tribute and memorial (“Safe in their Alabaster Chambers,” “The Butterfly in honored Dust,” “Departed—to the Judgement”). Dickinson’s idiosyncratic dashed lines stage endless verbal deaths as ideas and statements come quickly and then expire, each like a last gasp of breath, leaving tenuous connections between lines at times. Dashes inside the line halt other progressions, such as the separation of subjects from verbs evocative of the body departing from the activity of life, as in “And Firmaments—row / Diadems—drop—and Doges—surrender” (“Safe in their Alabaster Chambers,” 1861 version). Regardless of religious belief, Dickinson posits that death ultimately leads to oblivion. Calvinists may consider themselves as meek members of the Resurrection, she contends in “Safe in their Alabaster Chambers,” but grand events on earth and grand expectations of heaven (punned on in the line “Grand go the years”) eventually dissipate as human existence timidly evaporates like soundless dots in snow. Often, death is announced by a rush of cacophonic sound followed by silence, or a rush of quick activity followed by stillness, as life gives way to nothingness. So the heavens, or “firmaments,” are said to “row” like thunderclaps before the erasure of life into soundlessness, signaled in the poem by the strong use of sound plays involving s and d in the last two lines, as if all other sounds had been drained from the poem, mimicking the extinction of life. In “I felt a Funeral, in my Brain,” the funeral in the brain is accompanied by the beat of a drum, the creaking of the coffin and boots of lead, and a terrific tolling as if a bell is being rung out from heaven, before a great silence that triggers first an experience of utter loneliness and then the end of consciousness. At times, Death is personified as a musician, fumbling at the piano-like keys of the soul like a clumsy pianist, stunning the subject with a hammering music before dealing a knockout blow like a thunderbolt, which results in a stillness that sweeps the universe (“He fumbles at your Soul”).
It is this oblivion where terror resides, not the process of dying itself, according to Dickinson. By contrast, death is almost a comfortable passage; the gentlemanly Death passing by in a carriage offers a slow, peaceful journey toward the grave, treating the speaker to the sights of children playing at the local school, the grain-rich fields, and a sunset (metaphors for birth, growth, and death, respectively) as if on a day out. When Death and the speaker arrive at the newly dug grave, it welcomes them like a house, the swollen earth resembling a roof, the headstone like a cornice. The speaker who died for beauty quickly finds companionship in the grave—also characterized as a house, with rooms in which corpses are laid like guests assigned to bedrooms—meeting “One who died for Truth”; they determine that beauty and truth are one and the same, declare themselves family, and converse as intimately as kinsmen between the rooms until oblivion comes in the form of moss, which fills their lips and obscures their names on the gravestone. Sarah Barnsley
Nature in the Poems of Emily Dickinson
Nature is as recurrent a theme as death in Emily Dickinson’s poetry, characterized as an insistent force which cannot be ignored. Its elements are frequently personified, often as members of a tightly knit community known to the speaker (“A Narrow Fellow in the Grass”) who impose themselves regardless of their welcome. The wind is a tired man who stops by to visit a speaker’s “Residence within,” or consciousness (“The Wind—tapped like a tired man”). The comings and goings of days, months, and seasons are presented as visitors to the homestead of the human mind, where November announces its arrival by hanging its hat on a mossy nail in the garden (“The Day grew small, surrounded tight”). At other times, nature sends “sentinels” to seek out the most determined of hermits (“To my quick ear the Leaves—conferred”). Like death, Nature’s grip is tight and inescapable. Nature is a fertile subject for a poet preoccupied with mental experience, as much an external dramatization of the relentless activity and vacillations of the mind as it is a force in its own right. Extremes of geography and weather convey the intensity and
350â•…â•… Dickinson, Emily range of mental suffering through images of deserts, ice caps, earthquakes, storms, and whirlpools, as well as landscapes populated by predatory animals, such as leopards, tigers, and snakes, figures for the disturbing thoughts of consciousness that menace one’s being. The volcano is a favored metaphor for Dickinson’s own experience as an anguished member of a predominantly Calvinist community advocating emotional self-control. Her speakers conceal emotional suffering that smoulders like ash just beneath the surface (“I have never seen ‘Volcanoes’↜”; “The reticent volcano keeps”). In “A still—Volcano—Life,” the mouth of a volcano is likened to a human mouth, with coral-colored (and fleshlike) lips that hiss as if unable to restrain expression of the intense pent-up pain within, a pain that consumes the body like volcanic fire on rock (“There is a pain—so utter”); alternatively, the smoking mouth may belong to a chastising fellow citizen (“The Solemn—Torrid—Symbol”) threatening to erupt in disapproval of the speaker’s lack of emotional restraint, emotions that leak out in magma-like flickering when ruminating restlessly alone at night when it is dark, and so safe, enough to be discreet. Storms, however, predominate as a metaphor for human suffering. Like earthquakes and erupting volcanoes, storms provide analogies for anguish that can arrive suddenly and inflict severe damage; yet their comparatively higher frequency makes them a more appropriate metaphor for a suffering that is regular; constant; and, though painful, not ultimately life-threatening. Nevertheless, such emotional tempests are extremely harrowing, as marked by the personification of storms as supernatural beings—a monster wearing a specter’s black coat (“An awful tempest mashed the air”) or an emerald-colored ghost (“There came a wind like a bugle”). The disjointed form of Dickinson’s poetry resembles storm-damaged debris, where the abrupt, incomplete phrases and utterances are like street planks torn up by the winds of mental torment. In “To pile like Thunder at its close,” poetry is likened to a thunderstorm, a process that releases intense pilings of emotion within the quick beat of thunderclaps. This focus on the rhythmical sounds in nature is found in other poems: The wind plays a bugle, makes bell sounds from bushes, or tears through
forests as if frenetically playing a piano (“I dreaded that first Robin so”); the attention to rhythm evokes the powerful, melodic beat of Dickinson’s verse. The loneliness of Dickinson’s speakers finds correlation in the isolated natural subjects that haunt her poems, from the wind, timid like a man, who disappears from his host’s house, to the wind whose rising goes unnoticed by even the delicate leaves in a forest (“A Wind that Rose”), to the buzzing of a solitary fly that provides unexpected relief at the end of one’s life (“I heard a fly buzz when I died”). But if nature provides analogies for human suffering, it also illustrates human contentment—and occasionally ecstasy. Thus, a speaker finds resonance in a small stone “that rambles in the Road alone,” for in its independence from others it is comparable to the magnificence of another sphere that “glows alone,” the sun (“How happy is the little stone”). In this kind of self-absorption comes identity and even transcendence, Dickinson suggests: The little stone may be small, but its fixity on its spot on the earth has given it its color, or individuality, just as Dickinson’s fixity to Amherst furnished her highly individual poems. Sarah Barnsley
Spirituality in the Poems of Emily Dickinson
Spiritual matters take a central place in Emily Dickinson’s highly introspective poems, which are more concerned with the internal world of the human spirit than they are with the external world of commerce, politics, and social interactions. The “soul” is a recurrent theme in Dickinson’s verse, frequently personified, from the aloof, goddess-like figure dismissive of the external world (“The Soul Selects Her Own Society”) to the excitable creature that fizzes with energy like a bee or a bomb (“The Soul Has Bandaged Moments”) as Dickinson charts the vacillations of the human spirit between despair and ecstasy. Humans are shown to contain vast internal mental geographies that dwarf and triumph over the external world and tempt the self to explore the hidden expanse within. “The Brain—is wider than the sky” begins one poem, continuing that it is also deeper than the sea; “Exultation is the
Out of Africaâ•…â•… 351 going” champions the exhilaration to be had when the soul makes a journey from the “headlands” (a pun on the mind, meaning “the land of the mind”), deep into the intoxicating uncertainties of the sea further within. In the soul’s depths, this poem suggests, one might find “deep Eternity”; spiritual progression, Dickinson hypothesizes, comes from intense exploration of the inner world. In “I saw no Way—the Heavens were stitched,” it is the internal world, as opposed to the external religious sphere, that ensures transcendence. At the point when the observable “Heavens” (a pun on the church) offer no route through to the enquiring subject, closing their columns to her (a metaphor for the columns of a church building), the subject experiences a remarkable change of fortune: The earth defies logic and reverses its hemispheres, enabling the subject to touch the universe; the world within (the earth of the poem) contains tremendous force. Dickinson’s explorations of the spirit are often metaphysical rather than religious in tone, and they tend to emphasize a rational, scientific approach. Many of her first lines are grandly assertive, articulating definitions and conclusions about the nature of humanity and one’s place in the universe as if presenting scientific theory (“After great pain, a formal feeling comes”; “This World is not a conclusion”; “It was not Death, for I stood up”). At times, Dickinson draws on Darwinian theory to comprehend what happens to the spirit after death, positing in “This World is not a conclusion” that in death we evolve into a new kind of “species.” Matters of the human spirit and the universe are often discussed in measurable terms drawn from geometry, particularly their “circumference” and “diameter,” suggesting a desire to chart the spirit with exacting precision, but also the sense that spirituality is perhaps best conceived as essentially circular in quality—the metaphoric message being that the beginnings and the ends of the spirit are elusive and perhaps can never be found. Scientific assessment of the width, depth, and weight of psychological processes is undertaken in “The Brain—is wider than the sky,” but again there is a mystical quality to such speculation: Although the brain is said to be wider and deeper than the sky and sea in its capacities, it is, after all, “just the weight of God”—in other words, the brain
(or spirit) is in perfect balance with God (religious or otherwise) and equally as boundless. Hesitation to commit to a specific spiritual path is palpable in Dickinson’s idiosyncratic indecisive use of the line; the heavy use of dashes and incomplete phrasings suggests that the thoughts and assertions conveyed are provisional and open to revision, mimicking the processes of endless rumination made by Dickinson’s speakers. Her Calvinist heritage is satirized in poems such as “Safe in their Alabaster Chambers,” which criticizes the apparent hypocrisy of the Puritan elite who preach the virtues of austerity and restraint while requiring their tombs to be luxuriously crafted from satin and marble. God’s existence and the idea of a Christian afterlife are treated with some skepticism in this poem, where the only life that continues is that of the sweeping march of earthly events. In “Those—dying then,” the place for Christian souls on the right hand side of God is said to have vanished; God’s right hand has been amputated, declares the speaker. But though skeptical of Christian belief, there is an emphasis on the importance of spiritual belief, however flawed—better to follow the deceptive light of a will o’ the wisp (ignis fatuus, which literally translates as “foolish fire”), counsels the poem, than no light (illume) at all. Sarah Barnsley
DINESEN, ISAKâ•… (Karen Blixen)â•… Out of Africaâ•… (1937)
Out of Africa by Isak Dinesen (Karen Blixen, 1885– 1962) has three major themes—nature, commodification/commercialization, and responsibility—and the presence of these three themes inform Dinesen’s memoir of her time as a coffee-farm owner in British East Africa (now Kenya). In Out of Africa, Dinesen examines the impact of nature on the author and her use of the land, commercialism on the land and the people, and the responsibility of the colonial immigrants to the native Africans. Throughout her memoir, she describes the difficulties she encounters in trying to keep a coffee farm going in a country where she is an immigrant. Yet she balances these descriptions with depictions of the country and its people. It is in these descriptions
352â•…â•… Dinesen, Isak that she provides the reader with a true portrait of Africa and its people. The memoir is not written in chronological order, but its chapters are divided into Dinesen’s reflections on major incidents that took place on her farm during her time in Africa. She portrays the Africans not as savages but as a unique culture that has openly embraced the colonial immigrants in a relationship. Unfortunately, as she comments in her memoir, this relationship is not mutually beneficial, and in fact the native Africans have been pushed from their land by European and English settlers. As she states, “[I]t is more than their land you take, it is their past as well, their roots and their identity.” With this in mind, she fights for the rights of the African natives, the Kikuyu tribe, who live and work on her farm. By the end of her time in Africa, she is able to help the Kikuyu acquire new land to live and work on. Dinesen’s memoir is a tribute to her time in Africa and to its native people. Sumeeta Patnaik
Commodification/Commercialization in Out of Africa
Commercialization is a major theme in Isak Dinesen’s Out of Africa, and it plays a major part in her memoir on her time in British East Africa. During the 19th century, coexisting with nature was a dominant theme in literature and was used by writers to uncover truths about themselves and their relationship to nature. Dinesen uses this theme in her memoir, which allows her to also reflect on the impact of commercialization on Africa and its people and her personal impact as a coffee-farm owner. Commercialization of the land brought industrialization to Africa and its native peoples, and while Out of Africa does not describe the impact in detail, Dinesen’s reflections of her time on the farm demonstrate how much colonialism and the industrialism that resulted from it changed the way of life for African tribes. Commercialization first presents itself as a major theme in Out of Africa when Dinesen begins describing the work on her farm. Coffee farming, according to the author, is a difficult job often requiring 24 hours of labor seven days a week. She asserts that coffee growing is not going to make her rich since
the altitude of her farm is too high to properly grow coffee beans. Nonetheless, she describes coffee farming as an addictive process, noting that “a coffee-plantation is a thing that gets hold of you and does not let you go, and there is always something to do on it: you are generally just a little behind with your work.” Coffee growing is hard work, despite the assistance of the Kikuyu tribespeople whom Dinesen pays to work on the farm, and who live on and farm uncultivated areas of the plantation. Blixen comments in her book that she often thinks of writing as an “attempt to save her farm during hard times.” Yet the difficult times on the farm teach Dinesen a great deal about her relationship to the natives who live and work on her farm. The natives trust her and often come to her with the problems they face in dealing with the colonial government. Commercialization has produced an interdependent relationship between Dinesen and the natives, and for the author, it leads to a greater understanding of Africa and her relationship to it. For that reason alone, she finds it difficult to sell the farm when she is no longer able to make enough money to pay her debts. She explains that Africa has become the core of her existence and to perceive a future where she does not live on the continent is unthinkable. Out of Africa uses commercialization to reveal truths about the impact of colonialism on both the native Africans and European and English settlers. Native Africans often have to fight with the colonial governments for the right to use their own land, while Dinesen, as European settler, has to balance the needs of running her farm with the needs of the natives who occupy the land. Ultimately, her farm fails, and leaving Africa becomes the only option available to her. Her forced departure from the land she loves so much is a metaphor for the inevitable exodus that European and English settlers will make from the African continent. Sumeeta Patnaik
Nature in Out of Africa
Nature is a major factor in Isak Dinesen’s Out of Africa, and it pervades her memoir. From lush descriptions of Blixen’s coffee farm to the gradual infertility of her land due to the high, dry altitude,
Out of Africaâ•…â•… 353 nature is both a friend and foe to the narrator. Dinesen fundamentally views Africans as living closer to nature and thereby living a more pure existence, yet she realizes the dangers that industrialism will bring to Africa and its native people. With her time on the farm ending as colonialism is waning in Africa, Out of Africa shows the importance of coexisting with nature and the danger of underestimating its power. In her memoir, Dinesen uncovers truths about herself and her relationship with the natives of Africa, with the European and English settlers, and with nature. Nature’s importance as a “character” in Out of Africa becomes evident at once as Dinesen’s description of her coffee farm opens the book, thus providing a setting that will be used throughout her narrative. The farm is set in the Ngong Hills in Kenya (then part of British East Africa). Because it is set at such a high altitude, Dinesen can only grow coffee on a portion of her ranch; the rest of the land is used to house the Kikuyu tribespeople, who work the farm as payment for their use of the land, in addition to being paid a small wage. Dinesen experiences both happy and difficult times on her farm. For her, it is a refuge from the stresses of urban living in a city like Nairobi, which she describes as a “motley little place.” She reiterates this feeling throughout her book, despite the hardships she faces on the farm, where she admits that her “work is never done.” The farm is also a refuge for the African native tribes who are able to live in harmony with nature and avoid the colonizing forces of the European settlers. For her, to live with the natives on her farm is to live closer to the utopian ideal. Nature is not only found on the farm; it borders all sides of the farm, and its unsuitability for coffee growing leads to Dinesen’s eventual departure from Africa. Nature makes it clear to Dinesen that her utopian dream cannot overcome the forces of development. Throughout her memoir, she worries that the African natives will be unable to adopt modern technology on their land. She notes that the African natives and the European settlers do not share the same culture or history, making it difficult to reconcile how to use the land. In addition, she fears that the native Africans will be pushed from their lands by the colonizing Europeans. At one point, she says,
“it is more than their land you take, it is their past as well, their roots and their identity.” When her coffee farm fails, she delays her departure as much as possible, leasing her farm from its new owners and selling off her furniture. She does so in order to find a way to secure from the government a portion of her land for the Kikuyu tribe, who have lived and worked on her land since her arrival in Africa. Although she has had to give away most of her material possessions, her greatest reward comes in finding and restoring land to its original inhabitants. By doing so, Dinesen finds a revealing truth about herself and is heartened by the experience. Out of Africa uses nature to offer revealing truths about colonialism and the roles native Africans and European and English settlers play in the eventual destruction of the African landscape. Nature does provide a refuge to those who honor the land by supporting its original inhabitants; however, it is also destructive, as Dinesen witnesses in the eventual failure of her coffee farm and the devastation from development to the forests that surround her land. Like her fellow colonists, she is eventually driven from Africa, and her memoir Out of Africa is a reflection on the costs of striving to achieve a utopian ideal in a harsh environment. Sumeeta Patnaik
Responsibility in Out of Africa
Responsibility toward the African natives and toward the land of Africa itself is an important theme in Out of Africa. Isak Dinesen’s memoir details how she manages to negotiate that responsibility through her management of the coffee farm and through her mediation of disputes over land ownership between the natives and the colonial government. Dinesen uses the concept of responsibility to examine the impact of African colonialism—which began in the 19th century—on the continent’s natives. Dinesen’s recollections of her time in Africa show that the Kikuyu tribespeople on her farm relied on her leadership and advice. However, readers must also remember that the Kikuyu, living on their native soil, only need her advice because they have been colonized. Dinesen begins her memoir by describing her coffee farm and its day-to-day responsibilities. The
354â•…â•… Dos Passos, John Kikuyu, who live on the coffee farm, work as payment for their use of the unwanted land. Dinesen refers to these workers as “squatters” in her memoir while referring to herself as an “immigrant.” These designations are ironic in that they and their ancestors have been on African soil far longer than Dinesen. Because of this, much of what Dinesen learns about Africa and the native Africans’ way of life comes from this tribe. As a result, she feels a great deal of responsibility and obligation to treat the tribe ethically, both during and after her time in Africa. Dinesen’s descriptions of the African natives show the responsibility she feels to show them in a positive light. Her memoir contrasts greatly with other literature published during this time period, which often referred to Africans as uncivilized savages. Dinesen, on the other hand, specifically describes these natives as hardworking people who lack prejudice toward other races and often embrace Christianity of their own volition. Because the culture that the colonials have brought to Africa is new to Africans, the tribe often look to Dinesen to provide them with answers to the problems represented by the colonial settlers. She comments that she is often uncomfortable with the responsibility of representing the English and European culture and often finds the experience to be “alarming.” Nevertheless, she is grateful for the experience of sharing her culture with the African natives while learning about their culture from them. It is during the difficult times on the farm that Dinesen learns a great deal from the Kikuyu about the codependent nature of colonialism and the responsibility that whites have to native Africans. The relationship between the colonists and the Africans, according to Dinesen, is a codependent one, with Africans believing that the colonial whites, being out of their natural environment, are completely dependent on them. On the other hand, most British and European settlers tend to view the Africans as completely helpless, almost childlike. As Dinesen struggles to keep her farm, both during the war and when the farm becomes inoperable, the Africans are a major preoccupation for her as she prepares to leave Africa. The new farm owners do not want the responsibility of taking care of the Kikuyu, and she takes it upon herself to find them
a new home. During this time, she fights to have the tribe given land in another location. This is her last act of responsibility to the Kikuyu, and in doing so, she is able to leave Africa, content that the tribe has a place to live. Despite her work for the Kikuyu, Dinesen never states that she felt it was a responsibility, but a privilege as they had taught her so much about Africa. Her memoir is a record of the responsibility she felt toward Africa and its native peoples. Sumeeta Patnaik
DOS PASSOS, JOHNâ•… U.S.A. trilogyâ•… (1930–1936)
John Dos Passos’s U.S.A. trilogy, which includes The 42nd Parallel (1930), 1919 (1932), and The Big Money (1936), functions as a prime example of American satire. Frustrated by what he perceived as a class division in the early 20th-century United States, Dos Passos (1896–1970) wrote the novels to illustrate the need for political and social change. His experimental style, which includes four distinct narrative components, embodies the modernist aesthetic. The reader follows each of his 12 major characters through their experiences via fictional realism, but the narrative is broken by “Newsreel” passages, which include song lyrics and real newspaper clippings; “Camera Eye” stream-of-consciousness sections, which some critics have suggested may be largely autobiographical; and short biographies of famous figures in popular culture, ranging from Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson to the scientist Albert Einstein and the dancer Isadora Duncan. All of this combines to create what Dos Passos had hoped would be an expression of modernism viewed through a political lens. According to E. L. Doctorow’s foreword to the trilogy (published by Mariner Books in 2000), Dos Passos “saw literature as reportage” and thought of himself as a historian as much as an author. Indeed, his texts reflect this; there is something magical in the way Dos Passos describes these important moments in American history, and the books race along with what Doctorow calls “no plot, only the movement forward of its multiple narratives under the presiding circumstances of history.” Read as equal part historical fact and carefully constructed
U.S.A. trilogyâ•…â•… 355 fiction, the trilogy was a significant contribution to American literature. Unlike Ernest Hemingway and F. Scott Fitzgerald, Dos Passos strove to provide readers with the equivalent of a cinematic experience, and his words create a dazzling portrait of a changing country, what Dos Passos himself called a “slice of a continent.” K. E. Birdsall
Alienation in the U.S.A. trilogy
Even before knowing himself that his 1930 novel The 42nd Parallel would be followed by two further novels that together form the U.S.A. trilogy—his epic examination of U.S. society, culture, and politics in the first three decades of the 20th century—John Roderigo Dos Passos composed a novel he hoped would illustrate to Americans the potentially devastating effects of industrialization and industrial capitalism on U.S. social relations and politics. Especially in light of the radical shift in how people began to view capitalism’s influence on the individual and society as a result of the stark contrast between the Great Depression of the 1930s and the affluence of the “roaring” 1920s, Dos Passos felt compelled to describe these changes in all their complexity. The two following novels—1919, published in 1932, and The Big Money, published in 1936—therefore extend the scope of the often bleak picture he paints of American social relations, a picture that is centrally motivated by what he found to be one of the fundamental effects of capitalism on society: alienation. What exactly is alienation? In the context of U.S.A., we need to take into account Dos Passos’s leftist politics, within which alienation is one of the central factors in the social effects of capitalism. Specifically, the form of alienation U.S.A. is centrally concerned with is capitalism’s tendency to transform the relationship between people into one of commodities. In a capitalistic society, people become “alienated” from others (whom they begin to treat not as human beings but as competitors, or objects) and eventually from themselves, as they have to view themselves primarily not as human beings but as objects of exchange on the labor market. U.S.A. demonstrates this form of alienation in part via its arrangement. The reader is presented
with a multitude of characters whose narratives frequently intersect. However, Dos Passos presents these intersections not as indicative of community but instead as the absence of community, since the encounters between characters are often coincidental, superficial, and generally meaningless. Not one of the characters in the novels seems to be able to sustain a permanent relationship with friends, partners, or family members. In fact, characters (such as Eleanor Stoddard or Margo Dowling) who do, in fact, survive the struggle with capitalism and its social consequences, are only able to do so at the price of submitting to the alienating logic of capitalism by sacrificing human relationships. In this way, Dos Passos represents a fragmented assortment of individuals who, as a consequence of the influence of capitalism, are never able to come together as a community of human beings and hence remain forever in a state of alienation. The consequences of capitalism’s alienating effect on social relationships as represented by Dos Passos are often tragic, which further underscores the necessity to situate his perspective, on industrialization in general and on the 1920s in particular, firmly within the historical context of the 1930s. A prominent example of such tragic characters is Charley Anderson. A firm supporter of worker’s rights in his early life, Charley quickly becomes attracted to the possibility of making money from his talent for mechanical engineering. In his relentless pursuit for money, Charley increasingly abandons his previous interest in social issues and the treatment of others for an interest in profit. Ultimately, his sole focus on profit leads to the tragic death of Charley’s closest friend and business partner, an event that forces Charley to reflect upon his change. As a result of this process of self-reflection, Charley becomes an alcoholic and eventually dies of peritonitis. The most despicable characters in U.S.A., however, are those who have come to accept alienation as a social logic. It is those characters who represent the nucleus of U.S.A.’s view of alienation. While characters such as John Ward Moorehouse, who marries exclusively for money and judges people primarily based on their material “value,” are certainly represented negatively, his assistant Janey, for whom Moorehouse is a hero and an idol, represents
356â•…â•… Dos Passos, John the truly tragic effect of capitalism on society. Only within such an inherently alienating context can Janey regard Moorehouse as an idol, not in spite of but precisely because of Moorehouse’s “ability” to regard World War I not as a horrific historical event but as a potential for creating profit out of the destruction of Europe. In this way, Janey stands for a problem that for Dos Passos characterizes U.S. society as a whole, a society that has traded in the ideal of caring for others for the ideal of making a profit. Mathias Nilges
Gender in the U.S.A. trilogy
The so-called 1920s modern woman, with her bobbed hair, loose clothing, low necklines, desire to work, and newfound sexual freedom, embodies the cultural shifts explicit in John Dos Passos’s U.S.A. trilogy, which effectively describes what life was like in a time of burgeoning capitalism. Exploring the modern woman as a metaphor for this great cultural shift illuminates Dos Passos’s political concerns. Broadly speaking, the modern woman of the 1920s was less interested in the traditional role of wife and mother than she was in her own intellectual, financial, emotional, and sexual pursuits, and her behavior frequently reflected a challenge to the status quo. The drastic political change that accompanied women’s right to vote made many of them want social change as well: They craved their own style, their own money, their own jobs. Modern men, many of whom had just returned from World War I, were both perplexed by and attracted to this new brand of femininity. Early in The Big Money, the last volume of the trilogy, Dos Passos makes this clear in the voice of Charley Anderson’s friend Ollie Taylor, who “made a speech. ‘Look at them, lovely, intelligent, lively American women.╯.╯.╯. There was nothing like that on the other side, was there, Charley? Three things you can’t get anywhere else in the world, a good cocktail, a decent breakfast, and an American girl, God bless ’em.’╋↜”â•⁄ The modern woman dances, drinks, and wears (comparatively) comfortable clothes. She flirts, she woos, and, because she knows about contraception, she has sex. She often resists marriage but enjoys platonic friendships with men. She craves autonomy.
Examples of modern women, while present throughout the trilogy, are most clear in The Big Money. Not all women engage in previously taboo behaviors, and the texts reflect this. Like the men in the volume, none of the women are perfect; even their most independent behavior does not always produce spiritual wholeness or emotional satisfaction. Mary French represents the political activist, but she has a penchant for being too dependent on her relationships with others; Margo Dowling is Dos Passos’s screen-struck actress who embodies the idea of woman-as-object-for-the-male-gaze; Gladys is the unhappy wife and mother who lashes out at her greedy husband out of discontent; Eveline is sexually free but trapped in an endless, miserable cycle of cocktail parties. Charley Anderson, in his naïveté, figures prominently in the lives of many of these women. He represents the man who is powerfully attracted to the modern woman but, like other male characters such as Dick Savage, J. Ward Moorehouse, and Joe Williams, he has trouble being the modern man. After sampling different kinds of women, alcohol, and the quest for the big money, Charley Anderson ends up dead in middle age after a life of sheer excess. He is the satiric fool, and his interactions with the women he meets prove it. Throughout the trilogy, sexual encounters are abbreviated. There exists little romance in the texts, and sex often seems disappointing to the characters. A prime example is the relationship between Charley Anderson and Doris Humphries in The Big Money: after pursuing Doris for months, Charley finally has the opportunity for intimacy with her, but the act itself is monosyllabic: After he “fumbles for a condom,” she gets “dressed in a hurry” and then rejects him in a letter. This is representative of romantic relationships throughout trilogy. These characters yearn for intimacy but cannot seem to find it with one another. The modern woman of the 1920s was everything that her mother was not: She was unafraid of showing her intellect, was educated, and was often able to work outside the home. Many of the main female characters in the trilogy illustrate this: Eleanor Stoddard starts her own successful stage-design business; Janey Williams takes career risks and becomes a stenographer; Margo Dowling creates her
U.S.A. trilogyâ•…â•… 357 own cinematic destiny; and Mary French, arguably the heroine of the trilogy, is the only one of the main characters that Dos Passos keeps alive and healthy at the end. She embodies the social-activist-turnedfeminist, and an astute reader may find that, though hope is lost for most of the other characters—male and female—she provides a glimmer. While some critics have asserted that the literature of this historical period is inherently misogynistic, it would seem that Dos Passos was careful to construct his trilogy with women in mind. Most of the characters in the trilogy feel alienated—from one another and from society—and it would be a mistake to equate this sense with gender bias. In fact, Dos Passos’s women generally seem more able to handle the rigors of 20th-century life than his men, and this leaves the trilogy open to feminist interpretation. Dos Passos’s main concern was sociopolitical, and his men and women are equally guilty of following the pursuit of big money, much to the peril of their personal relationships. K. E. Birdsall
Success in the U.S.A. trilogy
Throughout the U.S.A. trilogy, John Dos Passos describes the early 20th-century American dream via his 12 major characters; “Newsreel” passages; and biographies of prominent figures in American history, such as Thomas Edison, the Wright brothers, Henry Ford, Rudolph Valentino, and J. P. Morgan, all Americans who achieved fame and fortune. Interestingly, however, these biographies invariably end in the death of the subject or the decline of his or her success. Dos Passos was illustrating that “success,” loosely defined, usually meant “corruption” or “unhappiness,” especially for the rich and/or famous. The three volumes encompass three distinct periods in American history. The 42nd Parallel takes place before World War I, when women are beginning to carve careers and independence for themselves and the country is abuzz with headlines depicting the “ignoring of [the] lower classes,” warnings to traitors, and anti-German sentiments. 1919 is a stunning description of the Great War, and the “Newsreel” passages in this volume range from advertisements for Liberty Bonds to “Bankers of this country, Britain, and France to safeguard foreign
investors.” The Big Money, which takes place during the time immediately following World War I and leads up to the beginning of the Great Depression, features “Newsreel” passages that show the growing labor force in the United States in the form of job advertisements and automobile ads. The last “Newsreel” of the trilogy, Newsreel LXVIII, begins with the headline “Wall Street Stunned,” indicating the stock market crash of 1929. The Big Money depicts “success” as opportunity and growth but ends with the idea that major social change must occur for the betterment of American culture. Dos Passos’s glimmering satire depicts the idea of success (at least in the traditional sense of financial gain and power in business) as detrimental to society as a whole, causing everything from personal disappointment to war and a national financial crisis. Via his fictional characters—who frequently do well in business but remain empty in their personal lives, often succumbing to addictions and other excesses before dying young—he paints a portrait of a society so overcome by the desire for riches that it neglects its people. Indeed, throughout the trilogy, Dos Passos presents characters that often become victims of their own shortsighted pursuits. Excellent examples of this are J. Ward Moorehouse in The 42nd Parallel, whose first wife leaves him because of the neglect she suffers due to his desire for success; Dick Savage in 1919, whose personal life unravels just as he meets with business rewards; and, perhaps most obviously, Charley Anderson in The Big Money, whose blind and alcoholic quest for business success causes him to leave behind loving relationships, family, friends, and personal growth. Charley Anderson ends alone and unhappy, and he is dead by middle age, after getting and flaunting the big money. Through the eyes of these troubled characters, Dos Passos shows that humankind cannot have it all. Society, it would seem, must choose between financial and personal success, and the texts depict the latter with characters such as Mary French, who defines herself not by how much money she has—in fact, she often wears tattered clothing to identify with exploited workers and lacks a warm coat for winter—but by how much she has to contribute to society. Through her, Dos Passos illustrates what
358â•…â•… Dostoyevsky, Fyodor can be gained by a true humanitarian enterprise. A political activist, Mary explains late in The Big Money what is at the root of unhappiness: “↜‘It’s the waste,’ she cries as she leaves a cocktail party, ‘the food they waste and the money they waste while our people starve in tarpaper barracks.’↜” Success in the trilogy coexists with gender issues: While most of the men seem to feel successful if they have money in their pockets, the women (while still happy to have money, in many cases) define success as achieving independence. For Mary French, whose last act is to leave New York to organize a labor protest, success is something more than just money, more than just independence. Success, for Mary French, means helping humankind reach some semblance of equality. In Dos Passos’s U.S.A. trilogy, she is the last hope for the success of American society and an example of a woman motivated by her awareness of poverty and inequality. K. E. Birdsall
DOSTOYEVSKY, FYODORâ•… Crime and Punishmentâ•… (1866)
Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1821–81) wrote Crime and Punishment in 1866; it was published in the Russian Messenger in monthly installments that year. The novel is set in St. Petersburg, Russia, at a time when Alexander II was seeking to modernize Russia following the examples of Western Europe. Dostoyevsky explores the problems that come with rapid urbanization: poverty, alcoholism, crime, and disease. The main character of the novel, Rodion Raskolnikov, is a student who has recently dropped out of college and is unemployed. The novel is aptly titled: It begins with a crime and ends with a punishment. Early in the narrative, Raskolnikov murders a pawnbroker and her pregnant assistant, Lizaveta. As the police investigation develops, Raskolnikov falls under suspicion. As he tries to convince himself that he has committed no crime—he did not commit a murder because he killed unimportant people—he befriends a prostitute named Sonia. She was friends with the pawnbroker’s assistant, which makes it difficult for Raskolnikov to rationalize his crime away.
Although Raskolnikov attempts to deny his guilt, he undergoes suffering nevertheless. He cannot sleep, he lapses into fugue states, and he even returns to the scene of the crime. He and the lead investigator, Porfiry Petrovich, play a game of cat and mouse as Raskolnikov seeks to stay one step ahead of the police. Although he confesses the crime at the end, he is not fully discharged from his guilt. He must learn that there are not just legal consequences but spiritual ones as well. Dutton Kearney
Guilt in Crime and Punishment
Like many great works of literature, the main themes of Crime and Punishment are found in its title. At the beginning of the novel, Rodion Raskolnikov commits an armed robbery that escalates into a double murder, and for the remainder of the book, he suffers various modes of punishment for his crimes. Because he thinks of himself as being above the law, he believes that he has done nothing wrong. However, his guilt follows him throughout the novel, and his failed attempts to escape both the police and his conscience lead to his confession of the murders at the end. When he was a college student, Raskolnikov wrote a journal article that distinguishes between two classes of people in history—the ordinary and the extraordinary. On the one hand, the ordinary class is made up of those who “must live in submission and have no right to transgress the laws.” The extraordinary class, on the other hand, has the right to commit any crime, provided there is a greater benefit to humanity in general for having committed it. Raskolnikov imagines himself to be a member of the latter class, which is why he believes he has done nothing wrong. As his guilt gradually overwhelms him, he realizes that he is not a member of the extraordinary class of human beings after all, and further, he realizes that such a class does not even exist. No one can escape the guilt of his or her crimes when those crimes directly affect another individual. Culturally, Russians often do not think of themselves as individuals but as participants in a brotherhood and sisterhood born from a common source—Mother Russia. The Russian word for this
Crime and Punishmentâ•…â•… 359 understanding of society is sobornost. Because everyone is related, a crime against one person is a crime against all. One of the major threats to Russia’s cultural identity came from Peter the Great and his wife Catherine, who were interested in importing the cultural values of Europe into Russia. Although Peter reigned many years prior to the setting of the novel, his influence is still keenly felt, most notably in the areas of language and religion. Fyodor Dostoyevsky was firmly against Russia losing its cultural heritage and becoming exactly like the rest of Europe. In setting the novel in St. Petersburg (which was swampland before construction began), Dostoyevsky takes care to note that it harbors poverty, drunkenness, disease, hopelessness, and crime rather than European prosperity. Just as Europe cannot transcend Russian sobornost, Raskolnikov cannot transcend the moral order. When he murders the pawnbroker and her assistant, he commits a crime against Mother Russia and sobornost. Consequently, he now stands outside of the Russian people. Guilt is the response of the conscience against murder, but it is also the response of cultural forces. Raskolnikov’s guilt manifests itself in various ways. The immediate psychological effects (which have been insightful in the development of modern psychology) involve nightmares, fevers, and hallucinations. While in a fugue state, he returns to the scene of the crime and arouses the suspicions of the police. He remains very sick until he confesses his crime to Sonia, a prostitute who was a close friend of the pawnbroker’s assistant, Lizaveta. Raskolnikov begins to see the effects of what happens when sobornost is violated—the many unintended consequences of his crime contribute to his guilt. Sonia tells Raskolnikov that he must go to the crossroads of the public square, kneel, and confess his crime aloud. For most readers, this scene is very puzzling, but if we take into account the Russian idea of sobornost, we can easily see that Sonia’s request will reintegrate Raskolnikov back into Russian society, first with Mother Russia on the dirt road, then with his fellow citizens. Unfortunately, Raskolnikov becomes self-conscious and stops short of fully confessing at the crossroads, but his feelings of guilt diminish. However, he does confess to Porfiry Petrovich, the chief
investigator for the police. Raskolnikov is exiled to Siberia, and although Sonia visits him regularly, he does not feel connected to the other people around him. Just as there are legal ramifications for his crime, there are also spiritual ramifications, which are symbolized by Dostoyevsky’s reliance on sobornost to explain Raskolnikov’s plight. One day during his exile, Raskolnikov sees Russian nomads in the distance. He is immediately reminded of the nomads in the Bible, and especially of Abraham. He suddenly realizes that he, too, is a son of Abraham. Raskolnikov finally understands that he has a role to play within the entire recorded history of humanity—his ineffective attempts to transcend that role have led to his current exile—and he falls to his knees and weeps in front of Sonia. His guilt has been discharged. Dutton Kearney
Spirituality in Crime and Punishment
Spirituality features prominently in all of Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s major novels. He was a member of the Russian Orthodox Church, a subdivision of the Eastern Orthodox Church. When he was a young writer, Dostoyevsky was arrested for participating in a socialist political group. His sentence was execution by firing squad. As all of the men lined up to be shot, a messenger suddenly arrived on horseback with a reprieve from the czar: Rather than be shot, the men were to be exiled to Siberia. Such a punishment was doubly cruel: The men were never intended to be killed, only to believe that they were going to be. Dostoyevsky was so traumatized by the event that he developed epilepsy, a condition that plagued him for the rest of his life. On their way to Siberia, criminals traveled by horse carriage through the countryside. They were often greeted by citizens who presented them with items such as clothes and books—the citizens believed strongly that the suffering of the criminals was beneficial to everyone. As St. Paul wrote, “Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church” (Col. 1:24). Because Russians think of themselves collectively rather than individually, not only is a crime against one person a crime against
360â•…â•… Dostoyevsky, Fyodor all, but the redemptive suffering of one person is the redemptive suffering of all. This concept, combined with spirituality, makes for a very closeknit community. One of the gifts that Dostoyevsky was given was a New Testament, which he read many times. Crime and Punishment contains many allusions to the story of Lazarus in the Gospel of John. Lazarus is a man from Bethany who is sick and then dies. His sister Martha and her friend Mary are friends of Jesus, who comes to Bethany with them. He goes to Lazarus’s tomb, prays, then says, “Lazarus, come out”—and the dead man is alive again. The story serves as a metaphor for Rodion Raskolnikov’s life. Raskolnikov, when he murders the pawnbroker and Lizaveta, metaphorically dies in the eyes of Russian society. In other words, he is not a fellow citizen—he has set himself apart and cannot be reintegrated until he makes amends for what he has done. He enjoys the story of Lazarus—at one point he asks Sonia to read it aloud to him— because he identifies with the dead man in the tomb. Sonia, of course, wants him to identify himself with the resurrected Lazarus. Unfortunately, this cannot occur as long as Raskolnikov lacks the capacity for compassion. In the epilogue, he dreams about a plague of microbes, which cause everyone to believe that his or her way is the only way. No one is able to see anyone else’s point of view, and therefore everyone is incapable of being compassionate. The dream torments him; he becomes ill and spends Lent and Easter in the infirmary. Lent is the 40 days preceding Easter, which is the day of Jesus’ resurrection. When Raskolnikov’s fever breaks, he has paralleled the life of Lazarus. He does not die physically, but his understanding of spirituality changes drastically—his old way of life has died, just as Lazarus died. When he comes to, Raskolnikov realizes that he has taken the sacrifices of Sonia for granted. She had willingly come to Siberia with him for his eight-year sentence, but he still felt no remorse for the murders because he felt no compassion for his victims. When Sonia becomes ill, and Raskolnikov is faced with the prospect of not having her to help him, he begins to think of others besides himself.
At this moment, he sees nomads in the distance— nomads who live the same life that the biblical Abraham must have lived. Raskolnikov realizes that not only is he a descendant of Abraham, but Sonia is as well. In fact, everyone is. When he fully understands this, he falls at Sonia’s feet and weeps. He is compassionate once again, and just like Lazarus, the man who was dead is now alive. Dutton Kearney
Suffering in Crime and Punishment
Fyodor Dostoyevsky—like his contemporary 19thcentury Russians—viewed suffering as an important aspect of life. Such a thought may seem strange to our ears in the 21st century, especially considering that so much effort has been devoted to eliminating suffering rather than accepting it. More than any of his novels, Crime and Punishment explores the restorative nature of suffering. Criminals who served sentences in jail had a special status in Dostoyevsky’s time. Everyone was presumed to be guilty; the only difference between a criminal and a citizen was that the criminal happened to have been caught. Thus, when a criminal was sent to Siberia (the Russian equivalent of our penitentiaries), the criminal suffered on behalf of everyone in society. When criminals traveled by horse carriage through the countryside, they were often greeted by citizens who presented the criminals with items such as clothes and books. Dostoyevsky himself spent some time in Siberia as a criminal, and one of the gifts that he was given was a New Testament. Undoubtedly, aspects of his understanding of the redemptive nature of suffering can be traced back to that text. Rodion Raskolnikov suffers in two distinctive ways: physically and metaphysically. Physical suffering is the suffering of the body, and because of poverty, St. Petersburg is rife with such suffering. Raskolnikov does not have sufficient clothing nor food. Some, like Marmeladov, turn to drinking to escape their problems (Dostoyevsky is one of the first writers to examine the consequences of alcoholism). Sonia feels that she must turn to prostitution in order to support her younger siblings. Far more important to Dostoyevsky, however, is metaphysical suffering, which is the suffering of
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himselfâ•…â•… 361 the soul. For example, Marmeladov’s heavy drinking not only causes his body to deteriorate; it causes the relationships in his household to deteriorate as well. Thus, his alcoholism is both a physical and a metaphysical form of suffering. Similarly, Sonia’s suffering is exacerbated by the intense shame she feels. Sonia has lost her good friend Lizaveta, and her loneliness makes her suffering worse. To the extent that Raskolnikov can acknowledge the different sources of suffering, he can overcome them. Unfortunately, because he thinks that he has done nothing wrong in murdering both the pawnbroker and the pregnant Lizaveta, his guilt prevents him from overcoming his suffering. The interesting dynamic that Dostoyevsky creates is the claim that metaphysical suffering leads to physical suffering and vice versa. In order for one to be truly whole, there must be health in both body and soul. Rather than exclude one at the expense of the other, there must be a balance between the two. No one in the novel suffers alone. The communal participation in suffering is an important aspect of the novel, even if Raskolnikov is too selfish to acknowledge that his actions affect the lives of others. Although he confesses his crime, he still refuses to fully suffer the consequences of having committed the murders because he feels no remorse for what he has done. Many readers of the book have difficulty in understanding the epilogue’s place in the novel. Sonia moves to Siberia to be with Raskolnikov, suffering for him in order to teach him how to suffer redemptively. Unfortunately, her presence does not have much effect on Raskolnikov; he is merely waiting out his prison sentence rather than learning what his role in society should have been in the past and what it should be in the future. However, he has a dream that changes his life. In this dream, a plague of microbes sweeps across the world, infecting everyone. This plague is unique in that it has intellect and will. Further, whenever people are infected with it, the microbes make them think that their opinions and judgments are the only possible and correct ones. Because no two people can agree on anything, the world descends into chaos and famine. Political leaders can not agree on policies, soldiers can not agree with their
commanders, and not even farmers can agree on the best way to plant and harvest crops. This dream is an analogy to Raskolnikov’s theory that some people are not subject to laws against murder; he finally understands that he is subject to the same laws and restrictions as everyone else. He throws himself at Sonia’s feet, his metaphysical suffering ends (he still has seven years of physical suffering as he serves his prison sentence), and he is reintegrated into the community. Dutton Kearney
DOUGLASS, FREDERICKâ•… Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himselfâ•… (1845)
The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself, by Frederick Douglass (ca. 1818–95) is a monumental narrative within the African-American literary tradition. Douglass’s narrative describes his experiences as a southern slave brilliantly and inspiringly. He moves his readers to sympathy as he recollects having experienced a childhood without knowing his mother or father (who was rumored to be his slave master). He witnesses the brutal effects of slavery on his fellow slaves and is even forced to watch in horror as his Aunt Hester receives a severe flogging and verbal degradation for disobeying her master. Affected greatly by his fellow slaves’ suffering and oppression, Douglass sees literacy as an important tool with which to combat the insidious pain slavery inflicted. While he can do nothing to stop the physical abuse, he works to teach his fellow slaves to read, a first step in learning to reject their supposed inferiority. Douglass’s text made his reputation as an influential and authentic writer. It presents Douglass as an educated black man able to articulate both his autobiography and his antislavery sentiments. His success as a writer was also aided by the prominent white male abolitionists William Lloyd Garrison and Wendell Phillips, who wrote his prefaces, attesting to the originality and truth behind Douglass’s narrative and calling for the eradication of slavery. Douglass’s Narrative became one of the most studied, revered, and widely read slave narratives, and it
362â•…â•… Douglass, Frederick remains so today. The work includes such themes as freedom, identity, race, and gender. Patrice Natalie Delevante
Freedom in Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself
In Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself, Frederick Douglass equates freedom with resistance and literacy and presents a case for nothing less than a complete end to American slavery. Douglass describes how white masters are free to whip, defile, and control black slaves through physical punishment, oppression, and shame. They quickly silenced any form of slave resistance. For instance, upon his refusal to return to his master Mr. Gore, Demby, a slave, is shot and killed. Douglass’s owner, Colonel Lloyd, claims that Demby’s defiance will inspire other slaves to resist punishment and escape to freedom, saying “the result of which would be, the freedom of slaves, and the enslavement of whites.” Clearly, as Colonel Lloyd’s paranoia shows, white slave masters greatly feared slaves contemplating freedom. Slaves learning how to read also struck fear into white slaveholders, so much so that it was forbidden by law. One of Douglass’s former masters, Mr. Auld, scolds Mrs. Auld for teaching Douglass the alphabet, rationalizing, “If you give a nigger an inch, he will take an ell. A nigger should know nothing but to obey his master—to do as he is told to do. Learning would spoil the best nigger in the world.╯.╯.╯.” White masters believed wholeheartedly that literacy was the “inch” slaves would take to seek their freedom. A literate slave would be an “unfit slave,” desiring freedom from physical labor, possibly resisting his master’s orders until he became “unmanageable,” ultimately seeking physical separation from his master. Just as society connected literacy with freedom, Douglass does here as well. To read is to have some measure of control, to be able to see the world on one’s own terms. After Mr. Auld scolds Mrs. Auld, Douglass realizes that literacy is forbidden because of a power relationship. A master has power over a slave because he is a slave, his property. Once this power relationship is unstable and removed, a slave-
holder’s powers and, ultimately, slavery would also cease to exist. A slave would realize he no longer belongs to his master but that he is free. After experiencing such a “grand achievement” in thus analyzing the slave system, Douglass describes literacy as “the pathway from slavery to freedom.” Because he has no regular teacher, Douglass must improvise in his efforts toward literacy. He strategically uses his conversations with poor white children to improve literacy skills that began with Mrs. Auld’s lessons. He brings the children bread from the Auld house and from them he gains a lesson. He also learns to read by talking with friendly white ship carpenters and from copying letters from books belonging to his master’s son. He reads books about the Catholic emancipation, abolitionists, human rights, and slaves being granted freedom by their masters, books such as The Columbian Orator. The more he reads about rights and emancipation, the more he becomes disgusted with and intolerant of slavery, the very feelings foreseen by Mr. Auld. He shares his feelings with fellow slaves and begins to teach them how to read in secret during Sunday school. He pities their “mental darkness” and inability to desire freedom. He explains that in drinking whisky “artfully labeled with the name liberty” during Christmas, slaves are fooled into thinking that they are experiencing liberty and that it is better to be “slaves to man as to rum.” Drinking makes them drunk, something that they cannot comprehend doing on any day other than a holiday. Thus, Douglass believes Christmas and other holiday celebrations become strategic moves on the part of the whites; he views these rewards as safety valves to keep the slaves from rebelling. Douglass also sees freedom in religion. He questions the existence of God, yet he sees that God can help him secure freedom. During his service to Mr. Covey, Douglass realizes mental freedom. He states a famous chiasmus: “You have seen how a man was made a slave; now you shall see how a slave was made a man,” before leading the reader through a sequence of events that prove this statement. Mr. Covey attempts to strike him, only to see Douglass resist and strike back. Mr. Covey “tremble[s],” a reaction more expected of slaves than masters. Douglass’s resistance prevents Mr. Covey from punishing
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himselfâ•…â•… 363 him for the next six months. Douglass states, “This battle .╯.╯. rekindled the expiring embers of freedom, and revived within me a sense of my own manhood. It recalled the departed self-confidence, and inspired me again with a determination to be free.” By this point in the narrative, Douglass has become a man, and dreams of freedom are foremost in his mind. He attempts to make these dreams a reality with his first escape attempt in 1835. Douglass’s plot to escape with fellow slaves fails when it is discovered by his master. When Master Hugh once again denies Douglass the privilege to decide his hours, employment, and contracts, Douglass attempts escape again. On this occasion, September 3, 1838, he succeeds. He does not provide the reader with explicit details of his escape in order to protect those who protected him. He reaches New York and describes feelings of “great insecurity and loneliness.” Freedom to Douglass becomes an endless feeling of seeing every white and black man as a potential betrayer of his freedom. He receives help from friends and from his wife, Anna. Ultimately, he exercises an important symbolic act of freedom; he chooses his own name. Patrice Natalie Delevante
Gender in Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself
In his Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Douglass depicts white southern identity during the period of American slavery and throughout the Civil War as a social construct, created by white masters and mistresses for the sole purpose of projecting themselves as the superior race. In order for white slaveholders to sustain their self-created identity, they must constantly reinforce their supposed superiority to their slaves. For both white men and white women, gender roles complicate this construct. Because in traditional southern society, men are superior to women, and whites are superior to blacks, relationships between the races complicate this system. Two episodes in Douglass’s narrative illustrate this complication. Captain Anthony and Mrs. Hicks, both slaveholders, “privilege” their slaves Aunt Hester and Douglass’s wife’s
cousin, respectively, until those slaves challenge the established gender roles. Douglass introduces Captain Anthony as the compulsive protector of his slave Aunt Hester. Although Hester is a domestic slave to a white southerner who “was not considered a rich slaveholder” from the perspectives of both white and black communities, Douglass describes her as possessing a “noble form, and of graceful proportions, having very few equals and fewer superiors, in personal appearance, among the colored or white women of [their] neighborhood.” White southern manhood prided itself on the ability to protect, nurture, and gain entitlements and access to white southern women; however, black women, being seen as literal property, were certainly not thought of as having their own sexual or romantic thoughts or desires. Captain Anthony strictly polices Aunt Hester’s whereabouts, limiting her tasks to those not requiring travel from the plantation in the evenings. Most important, Aunt Hester is forbidden from ever visiting or being seen with a local black male slave, Ned. The reader is not given the reasons for the prohibition but it can be inferred that Anthony does not want Aunt Hester to engage sexually with another man. She breaks this rule, however, and for her transgression, Aunt Hester is stripped to the waist and brutally whipped, a scene the young Douglass witnesses and later recalls vividly. Another episode illustrating gender roles involves Douglass’s white neighbor Mrs. Hicks. Mrs. Hicks shares her maternal space and bedroom with Douglass’ wife’s cousin, a girl of 15 or 16 at the time. Mrs. Hicks sleeps in her bed at night while Douglass’s wife’s cousin cares for her baby. Mrs. Hicks, Douglass relates, finds her baby “crying” and Douglass’ wife’s cousin “slow to move,” as a result of her “having lost rest for several nights,” from having had to tend to the Hicks baby. For this, Mrs. Hicks viciously attacks the teenager with a stick from the fireplace, breaking her “nose and breastbone” and ultimately killing her. The reader can conclude from Douglass’s description of that tragic night that white womanhood, disquieted by maternal rage precipitated by accidental neglect, ended the life of a young girl. White southern manhood is also called
364â•…â•… Douglass, Frederick into question as a result of this incident as well, for Douglass does not comment on Mr. Giles Hicks’s response to his baby being neglected on that night or allude to his subsequent prevention of or response to his wife’s act of murder. The white community does hear about the crime, and there is a “warrant issued for her arrest,” Douglass notes, however “it was never served.” In Douglass’s text, then, we can see how the dual cancers of slavery and sexism create a society in which no one but the white male has control over his own identity, and very human desires and needs of both whites and blacks often result in tragedy. Patrice Natalie Delevante
Race in Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself
Frederick Douglass’s Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, illustrates how the idea of race is created and maintained by white southerners on plantations worked by slaves. Southern whites regard Africans as subhumans. Blacks are treated as “mere chattel,” nothing more and nothing less, because there is nothing less at the time. According to the rationalization for slavery, the thousands of blacks taken from Africa were best used as slaves, toiling as domestic and field labor on plantations. They were treated as animals and were physically, spiritually, socially, and psychologically “broken,” as Douglass describes, witnesses, and experiences for himself. Ideas about race within southern plantations limited Douglass’s and his fellow slaves’ ability to become fully realized human beings with authentic family heritages, individual liberty, and choices and responsibilities. Douglass experiences the effects of being born and raised black in a racist environment. He knows he was born about 1835, in Tuckahoe, Maryland, but because he is black he does not, as white children do, know the date of his birth. Douglass resents having “no accurate knowledge of his age” or the ability to obtain such knowledge because of his slave status. Such (forbidden) knowledge or the lack thereof becomes a major source of frustration and “unhappiness” for Douglass the slave. Douglass’s status as a slave also prevents him from knowing his biological
father. He suspects that his father is also his childhood master, but by law he is not allowed to investigate his suspicion. Furthermore, it is important to note that because Douglass suspects that he might be a mulatto (i.e., born of mixed racial parentage), he understands that public knowledge of his biracial status would undermine how race was viewed on southern plantations. People of mixed race were most threatening to a slave system so firmly based on factors meant to sharply divide blacks and whites. Race during slavery, then, is predicated on white purity and superiority in general; anything less is black. Douglass’s race, or, worse, his possible mixed race, does not allow him to claim to his patrilineage. He is simply black. Douglass’s race also prevents him from staying with his mother. He is separated from her as an infant when he is sold to another planter, as was not uncommon. Douglass is put under the supervision of an elder female house slave. He deduces that separating black families is necessary to maintain existing race relations. Preventing slaves from building familial connections made them less likely to revolt. Douglass states: “For what this separation is done, I do not know, unless it be to hinder the development of the child’s affection toward its mother, and to blunt and destroy the natural affection of the mother for the child. This is the inevitable result.” However, Douglass’s mother circumnavigates the system to some degree, sometimes walking for hours at night so that she may spend a few minutes putting him to bed or sleeping beside him. Race relations during slavery also prevent blacks from entering into other long-term familial relationships. Mothers and grandmothers die alone and miserable from a lifetime cut short by slavery. Slaves were prevented from returning to their families after being sold, even if only to visit. And escape carried with it the pain of never seeing family again. Race relations also granted whites rights to break up local black community gatherings and events such as the communal reading of the Bible on Sundays. It is under the guise of such reading that Douglass attempts to teach his fellow slaves to read. Instead, whites wish for blacks to engage in demoralizing activities, such as wrestling, boxing, and drunkenness, because racial codes classified them as inferiors.
The Hound of the Baskervillesâ•…â•… 365 Such activities, it is thought, affirm their inferiority and powerlessness. Racial codes imposed by whites also create racial distinctions within the slave community. Special privileges, such as being sent to work in the “big house,” create hierarchies among slaves, for those working indoors are considered to be “the smartest and most trustworthy,” because they had obtained the trust of the master. Slaves longed to be house attendants and worked diligently, wholeheartedly, and subserviently, competing among themselves to obtain this privilege. Douglass also notes that slaves ranked themselves based on the class background of their owners. A slave belonging to a poor white slaveholder is considered a disgrace by fellow slaves. Race relations heavily influence conversations and interactions between slave and slave master. The slave is required to enter a slave master’s presence with fear and reverence; they must “stand, listen, and tremble.” Douglass gets whipped by his former slaveholder, Mr. Covey, for refusing to behave in this manner while performing outside duties. Because of his physical resistance, he receives a lashing. Later, Douglass refuses again to “stand, listen, and tremble” when Mr. Covey demands that he do so after he has collapsed from exhaustion. After continuous threats, Douglass “stands” but fights, causing Mr. Covey to “tremble.” In the end, Douglass ends up winning; Mr. Covey refrains from physically harming Douglass for six months afterward. Douglass’s defiant behavior has turned race relations upside down. Slaveholders treat slaves as chattel because their race gives them the power to do so; blacks endure their whippings because of their powerlessness and belief that suffering was their fate. Established race relations kept whites slaveholders and blacks slaves for life. Whites remain white and blacks black. It was their identity and the norm, and understood as the standard way of living. Patrice Natalie Delevante
and April 1902 and marked the return of Sherlock Holmes after his presumed death in “The Final Problem.” Doyle had intended to end Holmes’s career and return to his more “serious” historical novels, but financial and public pressures forced him to revive his hero and return to the detective story. In The Hound of the Baskervilles, Holmes is consulted by James Mortimer, who believes the new owner of Baskerville Hall, Sir Henry, to be in grave danger due to the mysterious circumstances behind the death of the previous owner, Sir Charles Baskerville, and the family legend of a great fiery hound, brought about by the evil deeds of an ancestor, Hugo Baskerville. As Holmes’s representative, Watson is sent to Baskerville Hall to watch over Sir Henry. There he meets the Barrymores, an older couple who work at Baskerville Hall; Stapleton, the naturalist, and his sister; and Frankland, an elderly neighbor and lawsuit enthusiast. Watson also discovers that Selden, the Notting Hill murderer, who has escaped from prison to the moors around Baskerville Hall, is Mrs. Barrymore’s brother. Holmes discovers that Stapleton is actually Rodger Baskerville, a previously unknown heir to the Baskerville estate. Stapleton has forced his wife to masquerade as his sister and has created a “hell hound” through the use of a giant, starving mastiff, painted with phosphorus. Stapleton’s deeds are revealed when Holmes, Watson, and police detective Lestrade shoot and kill the hound, saving Sir Henry. Stapleton escapes into Grimpen Mire, where he is presumed to fall victim to its quicksand. The Hound of the Baskervilles follows Arthur Conan Doyle’s well-established format for the detective story: A crime is committed, no clues are found by local authorities, and through a process of logical deduction and investigation, Holmes reveals the truth behind the crime and saves the day. However, within this otherwise traditional detective story, Doyle explores complex themes such as cruelty, fate, social class, death, guilt, and heroism. Kelly Connelly
DOYLE, SIR ARTHUR CONANâ•… The Hound of the Baskervillesâ•… (1901–02)
Cruelty in The Hound of the Baskervilles
The Hound of the Baskervilles was published serially in the Strand Magazine between August 1901
In The Hound of the Baskervilles, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle examines the contagious nature of cruelty and its wide-ranging impact. The cycle of cruelty begun
366â•…â•… Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan by Hugo Baskerville continues to affect the lives of the current generations, reaching far beyond its original victims. The story of the hound’s origins reveals the contagious nature of man’s cruelty. Hugo Baskerville, well known for his “wanton and cruel humor,” had convinced five or six of his compatriots to join him in the abduction of a young maiden who had spurned his advances. When the maiden escaped from her prison, a drunken guest at Hugo’s depraved party suggested releasing the hounds on her. Confused by wine and a mob mentality, the dinner guests stood idly by while the hounds were released, and the maiden’s fate was sealed. Although some of the guests eventually sobered up enough to realize the horror of their complicity and set out in pursuit of the maiden, it was too late: Both she and Hugo were dead by the jaws of the Hound of the Baskervilles, born of the cruelty not just of Hugo but of his willing accomplices. The infectious nature of cruelty can also be seen in Miss Stapleton’s inevitable collapse under the strain of her husband Rodger Baskerville’s evil deeds. In the guise of the naturalist Jack Stapleton, Baskerville has forced his wife to pretend to be his sister, in order to better use her in his cruel scheme. Although Mrs. Baskerville “had some inkling of his plans,” she can take only minimal steps to warn Sir Henry because of her great fear of her husband. Even more tragically, Mrs. Baskerville has become immune to the abuse she has suffered. When she is discovered bound to a beam and lashed by her husband, Mrs. Baskerville cries that her husband’s abuse is insignificant; it is only the loss of his love that matters to her: “But this is nothing—nothing! It is my mind and soul that he has tortured and defiled. I could endure it all, ill-usage, solitude, a life of deception, everything, as long as I could still cling to the hope that I had his love.” Mrs. Baskerville’s response to Stapleton’s cruelty has been a need to cling more tightly to him and to turn a blind eye to his evil deeds against others. Mrs. Baskerville’s corruption does not end with her admission of her continued love for her husband. When he is lost and presumed dead in the Grimpen Mire, Mrs. Baskerville “laughed and clapped her hands. Her eyes and teeth gleamed with fierce mer-
riment.” Her only regret is that she has not been more involved in the events leading to his death. The “eagerness and joy” Mrs. Baskerville displays as she, Sherlock Holmes, and Dr. Watson follow Stapleton’s trail to its dead end makes clear to Watson “the horror” and infectious nature of Stapleton’s cruelty. In Watson’s reaction to Selden, the Notting Hill murderer, the reader sees an alternate response to cruelty. Selden’s murders were marked by their “peculiar ferocity,” which resulted in the commutation of his death sentence due to doubts about his sanity. Mrs. Barrymore, Selden’s brother, remembers another side to Selden; she sees him not as the criminal he became but as “the little curly-headed boy” of her childhood. Mrs. Barrymore’s memory is hard to reconcile with the “terrible animal face” with which Watson is confronted, but it suggests that humanity lies behind the face of even the cruelest of criminals. When Selden is mistaken for Sir Henry and chased to his death by the hound, Watson and Holmes initially respond with a glee similar to that of Mrs. Baskerville upon realizing her husband was dead. Holmes dances and laughs upon discovering that the body he has assumed to be Sir Henry’s has the “beetling forehead, the sunken animal eyes” of the criminal Selden, and Watson’s immediate response is “thankfulness and joy.” However, Holmes refuses to leave “the poor wretch’s body” to the elements, and Watson recognizes that the death is still tragic. In breaking the news of Selden’s death to his sister, Watson again demonstrates that despite his cruelty and violence, Selden’s death is worthy of pity. Cruelty is rampant in the cursed moors of Devonshire, from Stapleton’s treatment of Laura Lyons to his savage abuse of the hound. Doyle demonstrates that such cruelty has the ability to contaminate all those in its path, but his sympathetic treatment of Selden also suggests that even the most cruel of humans is ultimately worthy of human compassion. Kelly Connelly
Fate in The Hound of the Baskervilles
The Hound of the Baskervilles, like most traditional detective stories, explores man’s ability to control his fate through the use of scientific investigation and reasoned analysis. The detective, in this case Sher-
The Hound of the Baskervillesâ•…â•… 367 lock Holmes, uses reason and deduction to demonstrate that what appears to be fate, to be destined and beyond the control of man, can be understood and controlled. As the novel opens, Sherlock Holmes speaks of “the dramatic moment of fate” as he and Watson await the arrival of Dr. Mortimer, who has come seeking their assistance in a mysterious affair. Despite his reference to fate, Holmes is a nonbeliever in the supernatural and in the ability of powers beyond our understanding to intervene in human affairs. Because of his scientific nature, he is inclined to disbelieve the tale of a hellhound bringing terrifying deaths to the Baskerville heirs as punishment for the sins of their forefather. Sir Charles, the most recent victim of the Baskerville curse, had accepted his lot and was certain that the “dreadful fate” arising from Hugo’s devilish deeds would be his end. His death, caused by fright upon seeing the hellhound in the flesh, leaves the only remaining heir, Sir Henry Baskerville, to face his fate. Dr. Mortimer has sought the assistance of Sherlock Holmes reluctantly, as he believes the realm of fate and the supernatural to be beyond the reach of even the most experienced of detectives. Holmes at first pretends to acknowledge this limitation. However, like most traditional detectives, he cannot accept that there are mysteries the human mind cannot understand. He knows that behind this fate, this curse, lies a human agent who can be found and punished. Sir Henry is less confident than Holmes that a human agent lies at the bottom of his ancestors’ tragic deaths. He is aware at all times of the past and the history that accompanies his inheritance of the Baskerville estate. For Sir Henry, the weight of the past continues into the present, guiding his actions and forcing him to confront his fate directly. Even Watson cannot help but feel the presence of the past as he walks along the mysterious moors. The neolithic homes of prehistoric men remind the current inhabitants that they were not the first to settle on the desolate moor. The presence of a civilization long since disappeared hangs over the moors and the Baskerville estate, reminding its inhabitants of the power of the past and of the temporary and fragile state of man.
Given the tale’s setting, it is not hard to understand why so many otherwise intelligent characters are willing to accept the fiendish existence of a fiery hellhound bringing the past of the Baskervilles to bear upon the family’s survivors. Holmes’s investigation, analysis, and deduction soon bring an end to this fear, proving that what has plagued the Baskerville family is not fate but “one of the most singular and sensational crimes of modern times.” Holmes and Watson expose Jack Stapleton— actually the son and namesake of Rodger Baskerville, who had fled to South America with a “sinister reputation”—as the earthly villain behind the mysterious events upon the moor. It has been not fate but human intervention that has caused the fear and violence experienced by the Baskervilles. Stapleton had used the family legend of a violent hellhound to scare Sir Charles to death and to attempt to do the same to Sir Henry. Holmes’s investigation has revealed a natural and human explanation for all events, bringing the question of a dreadful fate to rest. Before he is revealed as the villain, Stapleton, a local naturalist and butterfly enthusiast, bemoans “the fates” that brought ruin to a school he had founded in the north country. “The fates” brought an epidemic to the school, which was closed after the deaths of three students. Holmes reveals the truth, that the school “sank from disrepute into infamy” due to Stapleton’s inexperience. Again, the notion of fate is raised only to be rejected; Stapleton’s failure can be ascribed solely to human failings, and his condemnation of “the fates” only serves to underscore his very human role in his own downfall. The Hound of the Baskervilles demonstrates that a powerful belief in fate and providence remained in England in the early 20th century. Holmes’s ability to break the chain of “fated” events by solving the mystery, naming the criminal, and bringing an end to the curse of the Baskervilles suggests a strong opposing belief in the power of the human mind to understand and control destiny. Kelly Connelly
Heroism in The Hound of the Baskervilles
In The Hound of the Baskervilles, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle both reinforces and challenges the Victorian view of heroism. Sherlock Holmes, with his process
368â•…â•… Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan of rational deduction and strict adherence to class standards, remains an ideal Victorian hero. However, Doyle adds the more complicated figures of Sir Henry Baskerville and Miss Stapleton, proving that heroism may not be as static a concept as his protagonist suggests. Sherlock Holmes’s reliance on scientific reason, or deduction, to solve even the most puzzling of mysteries reinforces the Victorian belief in the power of science and technology. Holmes represents, as James Mortimer explains, the “precisely scientific mind” of Alphonse Bertillon, a French criminologist responsible for developing a method of identifying criminals through body measurements, combined with a “practical” understanding of man’s affairs. Through “scientific use of the imagination,” observation of details no one else would observe, and a careful consideration of all possible hypotheses, Holmes demonstrates the power of reason to explain even the most seemingly inexplicable mysteries and to restore order to the community. In this sense, he represents a traditional Victorian view of heroism. Doyle’s emphasis on the restoration of order suggests a second ideal of the Victorian hero exemplified by Sherlock Holmes. For the Victorians, social order and class values were believed necessary to the peaceful maintenance of society. Holmes is in many respects the ideal representative of a system based on such solid class values. Even after glimpsing Holmes only from a distance, Barrymore recognizes his class status, describing the unknown figure of Holmes as “a kind of gentleman.” Although Holmes has become more active than usual in his pursuit of the criminal and has taken to living at times in an abandoned stone hut, “his chin [was] as smooth and his linen as perfect as if he were in Baker Street.” Holmes’ inescapable class status marks him as a traditional Victorian hero, maintaining social order not just through his pursuit of justice but through his adherence to class structure, as well. Sir Henry Baskerville similarly represents the Victorian ideal of class as an inherent and unchanging characteristic. Despite his adventures in America and his “appearance of one who has spent most of his time in the open air,” Sir Henry retains “something in his steady eye and the quiet assurance of his
bearing which indicated the gentleman.” However, he emerges as a more modern hero than his class background might initially suggest—for instance, he rejects the traditions of his ancestors in promising to install electric lamps around Baskerville Hall, with “a thousand candlepower Swan and Edison.” In his depiction of Sir Henry, Doyle suggests a hero who functions as a counterpoint to the staid Victorianism of Sherlock Holmes. While Sherlock Holmes’s trademark confidence, if not arrogance, never fails him, Sir Henry is depicted as a more realistic hero, one whose fears and uncertainties are on clear display. Watson initially views Sir Henry as one of a long line of “highblooded, fiery, and masterful men,” a man who possesses the bravery necessary to face his possible fate at the hands of the Hound of the Baskervilles. It is in Sir Henry’s nature, Watson suggests, to live in precisely the place of greatest danger to him. In fact, it is Sir Henry who leads Watson after the violent Notting Hill criminal, with no concern for his personal safety. Sir Henry’s courage is soon tested when he first hears the cry of the hound on the moor. His confidence is now shaken as he recognizes the difference between contemplating his fate in the safety of the city and facing it in the darkness of the moor. He continues on in his pursuit despite his fear, but his admission of his terror marks him as a more conflicted hero than Sherlock Holmes. Sir Henry will suffer for his bravery, needing a long journey to recover from his shattered nerves. His flawed but heroic nature suggests a new type of hero for a new age. Doyle moves even further beyond the traditional image of Victorian heroism in depicting the small but brave acts of Beryl Garcia, known to the residents of Dartmoor as Miss Stapleton, the sister of Jack Stapleton—but in reality his wife. Despite her long-standing fear of her husband’s brutal treatment, Miss Stapleton repeatedly engages in small acts designed to save the Baskerville heir, first warning him in writing and then attempting to warn him in person to leave Baskerville Hall. However, like Sir Henry, Miss Stapleton is not a purely heroic figure. She fails to report her husband’s murderous actions to the authorities, and her final act of rebellion
An American Tragedyâ•…â•… 369 against his evil plan is engendered not by a sense of justice but by fury at her husband’s infidelity. Beryl Stapleton’s small acts of unselfish heroism are complicated by her complicity with her husband, thus rendering her an unusual hero for the Victorian era. In his depiction of Miss Stapleton and Sir Henry, with their fears and complicated motivations, Arthur Conan Doyle renders a modern depiction of flawed heroism. While Sherlock Holmes may rarely stray from the Victorian ideal of a confident, intelligent, and firmly upper-class hero, Doyle’s minor characters indicate that heroism may come in many forms. Kelly Connelly
DREISER, THEODOREâ•… An American Tragedyâ•… (1925)
Theodore Dreiser’s sprawling best seller An American Tragedy is based on Chester Gillette’s 1906 murder of a poor, young, and unsophisticated factory girl at Big Moose Lake in the Adirondacks. Popular almost immediately after publication, the novel spawned an adaptation and, subsequently, the 1951 movie A Place in the Sun, starring Montgomery Clift as George Eastman, Gillette’s fictional proxy (named Clyde Griffiths in Dreiser’s novel), Shelley Winters as the innocent Alice Tripp (Roberta Alden), Elizabeth Taylor as the socialite Angela Vickers (Sondra Finchley), and Raymond Burr as an opportunistic prosecuting attorney. Both novel and film have attained the status of classics in their respective genres. But the film’s purview is necessarily limited to the latter half of the novel dealing with George’s desperation when he learns of Alice’s unwanted pregnancy, his attempts to court the irrepressibly sensual Angela while placating the increasingly petulant Alice, his maniacal plotting to dispatch her at Big Bittern Lake, his subsequent flight to Angela at a lake resort, his pursuit and apprehension on the charge of murder, and his trial and execution. What the film omits, except by extrapolation, are the protagonist’s childhood, youth, and adolescence, all of which help to explain, if not justify, how a young man from a devout Christian family could contemplate, much less execute, so heinous an act
as to bring about the death of a poor girl dependent on him. Dreiser (1871–1945) does not give this background short shrift but examines it in minute detail. Book 1 and part of book 2 up to chapter 34 probe and analyze the causes of Clyde Griffith’s aberrant behavior. Dreiser uses corresponding episodes in books 1 and 2 to drive home the reality of Clyde’s neurosis and paranoia. Examples of corresponding episodes are his romantic attachments to the egocentric femme fatales Hortense Briggs in book 1 and Sondra in books 2 and 3 and his flight from responsibility and justice after the fatal accident in book 1 and after the death of Roberta in book 2. Among others, the themes of ambition, the American dream, and fate permeate this engrossing fiction. Jerome L. Wyant
Ambition in An American Tragedy
From the opening chapter of Theodore Dreiser’s An American Tragedy, in which 12-year-old Clyde Griffiths accompanies his evangelical parents and siblings on one of their proselytizing missions, to his arrest (book 3, chapter 8) for the murder of his secret girlfriend, Clyde is driven by an inordinate and misdirected ambition. While ambition is not in itself a negative motivation when directed toward such laudable ends as self-improvement or happiness, it is morally corruptive when it leads one to seek personal success and self-aggrandizement by any means and at the expense of others. Regrettably, the ambition that motivates Clyde is, almost from the first, perverse and self-destructive. In his case, ambition becomes allied to wickedness. In Kansas City, even as a young boy and then an adolescent, Clyde becomes disaffected from his parents, who can barely provide for their family. Because they are poor and shabbily dressed, he sees them as “foolish and less than normal—cheap,” and he regards their efforts at “praying their way out” of their difficulties as ineffectual. Rather, Clyde’s ambition is to be as successful as his uncle Samuel, who owns a collar factory in upstate New York, where he reputedly resides with his family in wealth, opulence, and splendor. Accordingly, for Clyde, success is centered on possessing and enjoying material
370â•…â•… Dreiser, Theodore commodities, which were becoming more and more available for those with the means to afford them in postbellum American society—a society that was increasingly self-indulgent and narcissistic. Without an education, Clyde’s prospects are limited; nevertheless, he resolves to make his way by dint of an amiable personality and good looks, and he advances from being an assistant soda jerk to becoming a bellboy at the Green-Davidson, a landmark hotel in Kansas City. However, his ambition is tainted as it leads him to conceal his actual earnings from his needy family, including his pregnant and unmarried sister, Esta, so that he can engage in selfindulgent spending sprees: buying expensive clothes, carousing with his friends, visiting a prostitute, and courting the vapid and self-absorbed Hortense Briggs. The first book of the novel ends climactically with a hit-and-run accident, which results in a fatality. This exciting episode establishes the utter inadequacy of Clyde’s ability to cope when confronted with obstacles to his overambitious goals. Clyde’s ambition is intensified and focused in the society of Lycurgus, New York, where he is given a supervisory position at his uncle’s collar manufacturing plant. His uncle is a “King Croesus” whose lifestyle Clyde aspires to. But Clyde’s ambition is thwarted as his wealthy relatives, ashamed of his plebeian background and lack of education, distance themselves from him socially. Even more galling to Clyde’s self-esteem and sense of enterprise is the disdain his look-alike cousin, the smug and condescending Gilbert Griffiths shows him. Clyde’s experiences with women during his adolescent years mirror a troubled, psychopathic personality that distorts reality as well as augurs the causes and consequences of his subsequent relationships with Roberta, a pretty working girl at his uncle’s factory, and the exceedingly beautiful debutante and socialite Sondra Finchley. To satisfy his ambition and overcome his profound sense of alienation, Clyde resorts to using women as the most efficacious and expedient way to achieve his personal needs and social aspirations; therefore, he all but coerces the sincere Roberta, who loves him, into a more intimate relationship than she, on account of her moral upbringing, can feel comfortable with or
society condone—this, even while he fawns on the vain beauty Sondra, who also finds him attractive. At the risk of being exposed by Roberta, whom he has impregnated and, thereby, ostracized by the polite society to which he has finally gained access because of Sondra’s sponsorship, Clyde resolves to act. He then resorts to desperate measures in an attempt to achieve his ambitions. The third and final book of the novel, insofar as the ambition theme is concerned, deals with the district attorney Orville Mason’s dogged pursuit and prosecution of Clyde for Roberta’s murder. Mason is motivated, at least in part, by political considerations. Dreiser’s portrayal of the pugnacious Mason, while fair and nuanced, is, when all is said and done, that of an arch opportunist and, in that respect at least, not altogether unlike Clyde. Jerome L. Wyant
The American Dream in An American Tragedy
For Theodore Dreiser, the American dream was, except for a fortunate few, a chimera, an Eldorado to be quested after, a grail to seek and covet but never to grasp. Ignoring the law of the land therefore becomes for Clyde Griffiths, Dreiser’s hapless hero in An American Tragedy, the only viable way of achieving the dream, and in that quest, murder will be countenanced and justified. Achieving the dream by whatever means becomes paramount for Clyde; it is his only guiding principle. There can be little doubt that Dreiser himself is the prototype for his protagonist, Clyde Griffiths. The son of immigrant parents, his father a religious fanatic who lacked a scintilla of backbone, and bereft of practicality, the young Dreiser felt alienated from the American dream, a mythical construct built on the premise that the United States is “a land of plenty, of opportunity and of destiny.” Implicit in this formulation is the belief that with the exercise of talent and industry, one can amass fabulous wealth and live virtually as a king or potentate, surfeited in material possessions. While exceptional life stories of business tycoons like Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller gave credence to the myth, Dreiser’s fiction gives the lie to such grandiose expectations as far as the masses are concerned. However hard they
An American Tragedyâ•…â•… 371 labor, Dreiser opines, they are consigned to aspire but never achieve and to live bleak lives of quiet desperation. In the first of the three books comprising the novel, Dreiser focuses on his youthful hero’s yearning for a better and different life and destiny than the one apparently meted out to him by chance or an improvident fate or God. Clyde is described as disaffected from his family, who subsist on the margins of poverty. While his parents are inured to poverty by long association and see their deprivation as the road to salvation, Clyde, even at 12, is unconvinced and mostly mortified; he is perceived by bystanders as disaffiliated from his parents’ proselytizing mission. He has a sense that life has something more to offer. Clyde is emotional and passionate, which triggers in him thoughts of self-improvement. He is clearly captivated by the promise of the American dream, an oasis in the desert of daily existence, and for evidence of his inherent hereditary right to its emoluments, he has the example of his uncle Samuel, his father’s entrepreneurial and successful brother, a “kind of Croesus” living in Lycurgus, a city modeled after upstate Cortland, New York. Dreiser offers the reader an inverse gender example of the pursuit of the American dream gone awry in his depiction of Clyde’s sister, Esta. While her passion is to possess pretty things, which is more venial and less consuming than Clyde’s, it has nearly as disastrous an outcome. In running away with a rogue who plies her with baubles, gets her pregnant, and then deserts her, she prefigures Roberta Alden, whom Clyde similarly seduces. In his desire to secure the American dream, the adolescent Clyde secures work, first as a soda jerk and then as a bellboy, and he is nothing if not ambitious and eager to please the patrons of the prestigious Green-Davidson Hotel. From the start, however, Clyde’s pursuit of the American dream is flawed by a false belief in his exceptionality and by his subterfuge in concealing from his dutiful and self-sacrificing mother the extent of his earnings. Clyde’s problems begin when he comes to realize that the American dream, while it may exist for the privileged few, is not accessible to him on the scale he has envisioned. While individuals are allowed to achieve and to have the opportunity to achieve in
the United States, one would be naive to think that there is not a social class hierarchy based on birth and station in life. While it is declining to some extent, this class hierarchy is still very important in wealth, in education, and in business. Clyde is dissuaded by experience that hard work will receive its just reward. He comes to understand that the accretion of wealth will take more years than he has to give to the experiment. Desiring gratification sooner than later, he looks increasingly for a more direct route to becoming wealthy and affluent. The incarnation of the American dream for Clyde is the young Lycurgus debutante Sondra Finchley, who embodies wealth, affluence, and a provocative but cool sensuality in one tidy bundle. His achieving the American dream would be, he thinks, accomplished if he could only marry Sondra. It is, however, one of the grotesque ironies of the novel that Clyde might have been able to realize his conception of the American dream if he had been more assiduous in his work, more careful in his choice of companions, and more candid with those acquired. Unable to defer his self-gratification and curb his rampant sexual appetite, he callously exploits the affections of poor Roberta Alden, whom he subsequently abandons to drown in a lake. Clyde’s rapacious pursuit of the American dream culminates in his execution for Roberta’s murder, for which he is morally culpable if legally not guilty. Perhaps Dreiser is intimating that a monomaniacal pursuit of the American dream is self-destructive and death-inducing. Jerome L. Wyant
Fate in An American Tragedy
The writer Theodore Dreiser most emulated was the 19th-century British author Thomas Hardy, in whose work fate was a major element. Dreiser’s novel An American Tragedy is reminiscent of much of Hardy’s fiction, reflecting, as it does, the latter’s pessimistic and nihilistic philosophy. Both Hardy’s and Dreiser’s characters are buffeted by the tempestuous winds of chance. Dreiser was as cynical as Hardy, and his view of life scoffed at the possibility of securing selffulfillment and happiness in a world naturally indifferent at best and inimical at worst to one’s
372â•…â•… Dreiser, Theodore dreams and hopes. More so than Hardy, though, Dreiser, taking his cues from the philosopher Herbert Spencer, emphasized genetics and heredity, together with family and social environment, as influencing character and, therefore, as determiners of an individual’s fate. According to Spencer, traits of character were inherited; consequently, “Character determined fate and a bad fate meant a bad character.” Clyde Griffiths is one of Dreiser’s most fated characters. The reader of An American Tragedy attributes many of the determining and sometimes conflictive elements in him to genetics and heredity, as represented in Clyde by his improvident, feckless father and rigidly religious mother. In Dreiser’s fiction in general and in An American Tragedy in particular, there is less emphasis on the role of chance in an objective world and more on combinations of genetic and hormonal elements and their myriad interactions in the psychic life of the inner man. Clyde’s grandiose aspirations to achieve a gentrified status, comparable to his uncle’s, are squarely at odds with his concomitant cravings for instant sexual gratification from the girls and women with whom he comes in contact and, especially with the collar factory sirens whom he supervises at work: “His was a disposition easily and often intensely inflamed by the chemistry of sex and the formula of beauty. He could not easily withstand the appeal, let alone the call of sex.” Herbert Spencer, upon whom Dreiser depended for the philosophical underpinnings of his fiction, believed that desires were what drove human beings to move forward. As Spencer did, Dreiser dismissed free will, arguing that one’s fate was determined by the alignment of certain inner chemical reactions with others experienced as a result of his or her environment. Clyde’s Achilles’ heel is his sexual voracity. His repression of his libido in his quest for superior social station results in his being so sexually famished by the time he meets the pert Roberta Alden that he finds this plain country girl irresistible: “Day after day and because so much alone and, furthermore, because of so strong a chemic or temperamental pull╯.╯.╯.╯, he could no longer keep his eyes off her or she hers from him.” As the first part of the novel depicting Clyde’s childhood and adolescence makes clear, the social
environment of big-city life—fast-paced, teeming with strangers, and rife with competition—adversely impacts Clyde and his direction in life. He adapts, perforce, in order to survive (and thrive) in a Darwinian universe in which he feels alien, largely owing to his parents’ abjuration of its commoditybased, laissez-faire system. At first, he seems naturally ambitious and without guile, but he becomes increasingly opportunistic. At the Green-Davidson Hotel, he learns from peers how to manipulate others for his own personal aggrandizement, and he adopts the pack psychology of the group of pleasureseeking youths with whom he works: He parties with sexually permissive young women, and he has his first-ever sexual experience with a seasoned prostitute. Clearly, he sees women only as objects of self-gratification and not as bona fide human beings with dreams and aspirations. If one does not see others as being of equal value, it is difficult, if not impossible, to have empathy for them, and Clyde’s lack of empathy is conspicuous throughout. He conceals the amount of his wages from his mother, who is hard-pressed to make ends meet, and he ignores the plight of his pregnant sister, Esta, choosing instead to purchase an expensive coat for the minx Hortense Briggs, with whom he is infatuated. Confronted with a crisis, Clyde lacks responsibility. He cannot feel responsibility for others because he lacks any sense of personal identification with them. In the climactic car accident episode at the end of book 1, Dreiser focuses more on the panicked reactions of the other occupants of the car to take the spotlight off Clyde, who is less responsive to the effects of the crash than his friend Ratterer. Clyde’s response is more akin to that of Hortense Briggs, who is concerned only with the desecration of her vaunted beauty. Clyde is self-consumed: “Think of what would happen to him if he were caught.” This episode nicely foreshadows Clyde’s more culpable (because it was more planned) reaction after Roberta falls out of the boat and drowns in Big Bittern Lake at the end of book 2. Over all these tragic characters looms a dark cloud of destiny. There is the gathering sense for the reader that, no matter what the protagonists do, their fate is sealed. They are caught in a predica-
Sister Carrieâ•…â•… 373 ment, much like a conundrum. Whatever alternative they choose will bring horrific consequences in its wake. However, the protagonists of ancient Greek legend either accept or resign themselves to the inevitable suffering and, by dint of their perseverance, resolve, and dignity, transcend it. This is not the case with Clyde, who cannot accept the consequences of his actions because he has no sense of his perfidy in plotting the murder of Roberta Alden. He is far more pathetic than tragic. While exciting, the last book of the novel is actually anticlimactic as far as Clyde is concerned, in that it focuses exclusively on the machinations of the law to find Roberta’s murderer and then to convict and punish him. Orville Mason, the zealous prosecutor, and his agents pursue Clyde with the fervor and relentlessness of the Greek Erinyes (Furies), albeit more out of personal motives than for reasons of justice. There is, regrettably, no record or commentary on any moral improvement in Clyde. Jerome L. Wyant
DREISER, THEODOREâ•… Sister Carrieâ•… (1900)
Theodore Dreiser’s debut novel, Sister Carrie (1900), relates the story of Caroline (Carrie) Meeber, who leaves her modest small town at the age of 18 to search for happiness in the big city. In Chicago, she initially steps up from poverty after meeting a salesman, Charles Drouet, who introduces her to the world of urban wealth and comfort. Through Drouet, she also meets George Hurstwood, a bar manager with some social standing and an unhappy marriage. The second half of the narrative is set in New York City, where Carrie elopes with Hurstwood after leaving Drouet. For Carrie, each of her significant male acquaintances—including the last of them, Mr. Ames—represents another promise of a better life. Eventually, her dreams are partially fulfilled on the Broadway stage, while the abandoned Hurstwood gradually falls to the very bottom of the social ladder. In keeping with the naturalist tradition, Dreiser places primary emphasis in Sister Carrie on the daunting side of life in the metropolis and individuals’ limited ability to determine their own
fate. Daily life comes across as a tragedy in which the characters are repeatedly driven into action by pain, lust, greed, and vanity. Strong human emotion creates a counterforce to this sordidness in the novel. The discomforting contrast between poverty and luxury is most conspicuously visible in the plot through the intertwined strands of Carrie’s ascent to fame and Hurstwood’s dramatic downfall. The novel’s disturbing content, including Carrie’s illicit relationships with both Drouet and Hurstwood, created controversy at the time of publication and considerably delayed the book’s success. Markku Samela
Innocence and Experience in Sister Carrie
The first and last scenes of Theodore Dreiser’s Sister Carrie (1900) illustrate the novel’s consistent theme of disappearing innocence. As the first chapter opens, the hopeful protagonist, nervously anticipating her arrival in the great city of Chicago, is described as “full of the illusions of ignorance and youth.” After reaching the brink of adulthood in a small town, 18-year-old Carrie feels the magnetism of the city in her very bones. In the ensuing narrative, Carrie moves through various stages of maturity, only to realize that experience comes at a severe price. In the last scene, sitting in her rocking chair and gazing down to New York’s Fifth Avenue, she feels “often disillusioned” despite having achieved a social position of relative fame and material wealth. Her disillusionment is increasingly apparent toward the end of the novel. Besides having lost some of her previous fascination with the metropolis and its inhabitants in general, she has seen the hollowness of people and ideas she used to hold in high regard. The whole story implies that innocence can be both a valuable resource and a serious liability. Carrie’s early attempts at finding employment in the factories of Chicago repeatedly fail because she lacks relevant experience; she encounters the same problem again while trying to launch her stage career. Beauty is the decisive asset that ultimately allows her to clear these hurdles. Similarly, in her private life she benefits from men who are attracted to her innocent beauty, suggestive of virginity. Both of her male companions, Charles Drouet and George Hurstwood, are initially motivated not only by
374â•…â•… Dreiser, Theodore sexual desire but also by an apparently genuine urge to protect her from the dog-eat-dog spirit of newly industrialized society. Nevertheless, both men also break their promises of marriage to her, thus speeding up the loss of her alluring innocence. For Carrie, experience translates into the freedom to make independent choices, even if experience itself sometimes requires immoral acts. This is evident when, while still in Chicago, her infidelity to Drouet causes him to lose his dominance over her: Unlike before, she “did not study him with eyes expressive of dependence.” Where experience is acquired, purity is lost. After moving to New York with Hurstwood, Carrie gradually gains the ability to assess her own situation realistically and to set standards for herself. The character of Mr. Ames, albeit only a passing acquaintance for her, contributes significantly to her intellectual maturity by offering an example in cultural and social awareness. Still in her 20s, the heroine adapts some of her value judgments and preferences directly from Ames. Dreiser’s novel does not, however, depict Carrie’s journey as a straightforward one from innocence to experience. Despite being exposed to cynicism, she preserves her dream of happiness, guided—as the narrator states in the end—by emotion rather than reason. This relative innocence of the protagonist places Sister Carrie firmly within American literary tradition and enables the story to illustrate powerfully the effects that various social forces have on the individual. On the level of social and personal growth, the novel contrasts experience with the dynamism of youth. While experience can become valuable in a competitive society, Dreiser makes clear that the economic system primarily feeds on youthful energy. More important, experience cannot substitute for youth. Despite Carrie’s talent as an actress, she has her pretty face to thank for her success on Broadway. In contrast, Hurstwood proves incapable of maintaining his social status and, ultimately, his livelihood, partly due to his “handicap of age,” which renders his prior success and work experience irrelevant, even undesirable. For employers, he discovers, inexperienced workers are also inexpensive, whereas Hurstwood’s own knowledge and skills have lost their marketable value. Carrie sees the deepening
wrinkles on his face and eventually abandons him to poverty, intuitively understanding that he has become an impediment to her personal progress. At the end of the novel, Carrie decisively leaves behind both of the men who introduced her to the metropolis when she was an innocent girl. At the age of 27, she is perhaps at the height of her career, while Hurstwood, once a shining example of social competence, has lost everything and been driven to suicide. Dreiser’s novel seems to point to the pessimistic conclusion that neither innocence nor experience has permanent value: Sooner or later society will consume the former and ignore the latter. Markku Salmela
Sex and Sexuality in Sister Carrie
When Theodore Dreiser wrote Sister Carrie (1900), explicit representation of sexuality was just beginning to appear in popular fiction. Much of the suggestive description in Dreiser’s original manuscript was removed during the editorial process. Although sex is a motivating force behind many of the main events in the story, it remains mostly between the lines. However, numerous details in the text hint at the untold. From the very first scene, Caroline (Carrie) Meeber’s attractiveness in the eyes of men seems her chief asset. After meeting Charles Drouet, she realizes “that she was of interest to him from the one standpoint which a woman both delights in and fears.” Subsequently, it is this male desire—embodied, above all, in Drouet and her other lover, George Hurstwood—that facilitates Carrie’s progress both professionally and in social circles. Eventually, it opens doors to high society and the theater stage. Male characters in the novel seem powerfully driven by their animal instinct: Drouet is practically controlled by his “inborn desire” for women, and Hurstwood craves excitement after his marriage has grown stale. Having traveled to Philadelphia— ostensibly on business—and “enjoyed himself thoroughly” there, he meets Carrie and falls wildly in love. To illustrate both men’s lust, Dreiser titles both chapters 20 and 21 “The Lure of the Spirit: The Flesh in Pursuit.” Carrie gradually learns to feed this desire and to see social opportunity in it. The heroine spends almost a year living with Drouet in Chicago and another several years with
Sister Carrieâ•…â•… 375 Hurstwood in New York City. Her relationships with both of her male protectors resemble marriage in all practical respects. After Drouet’s original conquest of Carrie, she thinks “with mournful misgivings” about something she has lost, apparently her virginity, but considers desire itself her excuse: “The voice of want made answer for her.” Yet, given that she benefits financially from the arrangement, one could interpret this desire of hers as primarily aimed at material things. Likewise, during her period of cohabitation with Hurstwood, she seems mainly concerned with matters of domestic economy. Despite the illicit nature of the relationships and both men’s obvious craving for her, from Carrie’s own point of view, all interaction is peculiarly asexual. She is only vaguely conscious of her own desirability, which merely adds to her innocent appeal from the male perspective. Female sexual desire, however, remains a mystery: Carrie’s own passions are consistently directed at social and material achievement. At the time of the novel’s publication, the taboo of female sexuality was being unraveled by other American texts such as Kate Chopin’s The Awakening (1899), but in Sister Carrie lust is still largely a property of the male brain. Significantly, while initially living with her sister’s family in Chicago, Carrie has an unfortunate habit of standing at the doorway of the building, as if on display. Throughout the story, there are implications of the value of sexuality as a type of practical currency; in effect, Carrie sells herself to Drouet for nice clothes and a place to live. This arrangement, just like her later union with Hurstwood, suggests a simple exchange in which she receives a livelihood and he intimacy. Her prolonged attempts to find an acting role on Broadway also subtly hint at prostitution: Hurstwood is “dead to the horror of ” her plan to “try some of the managers” of theater companies directly. Carrie’s good looks finally win her a job through a man “who judged women as another would horseflesh.” Thus, sexual desirability is shown to serve as raw material for society’s inherent economies, a significant factor in the equations of survival in the urban jungle. In time, Carrie’s ascent suggests, sex appeal is likely to transform into wealth, fame, and social standing.
Although Hurstwood’s desire for Carrie wanes after financial hardship sets in, the shared bed remains an important symbol. Her decision to start sleeping alone in a separate room represents the beginning of the end, “a grim blow” to him, marking the final loss of his power and influence over her. Here and elsewhere, focusing on sexuality as one of the determining factors of human existence, Dreiser’s novel emphasizes that people are animals of flesh and blood, conditioned by biology as much as by social demands. Markku Samela
Social Class in Sister Carrie
Carrie Meeber, the title character of Theodore Dreiser’s novel Sister Carrie (1900), has a natural instinct for observing the outward signs of social class. She decides to ignore the lower-class boys and girls at the Chicago factory where she starts working after her arrival in the city, for “there was something hard and low about it all.” Subsequently, she largely chooses her male companions—first Charles Drouet, then George Hurstwood—by the promise of personal advance that they represent. The story barely distinguishes between wealth and class; in the long run, money brings about high social standing. Conversely, status also functions as a type of capital: something that ensures one’s ability to bargain. Throughout the novel, outward material clues are used to indicate someone’s class status. This is also why characters pay so much attention to surface appearances. The urban individuals portrayed in the text seem to assume that the right choices as a consumer—the right clothes, jewelry, shoes, interior furnishings, linen, and so forth—eventually have a positive effect on one’s position in society’s hierarchies. Drouet, for example, also dreaming of social ascent, “only craved the best, as his mind conceived it.” Similarly, Hurstwood elevates his own reputation and social rank by emphasizing his cultivated taste in cigars and alcohol. His smoothness of manner has helped to raise him to “our great American upper class—the first grade below the luxuriously rich.” For Carrie, who has instinctively realized how materialistic society works, seeing expensive merchandise is a life-altering experience. She admires Drouet, whose “rings almost spoke” to her; the feel
376â•…â•… DuBois, W. E. B. of $10 bills; hats, dresses, and little accessories; and the “shine and rustle of new things.” Pieces of clothing speak to her as well, and a significant symbol of the upper class is “the roll of cushioned carriages.” While problems relating to personal finances bother her throughout the story, it is through these material things that consciousness of social class takes hold of Carrie. A pertinent example of a class distinction coded in personal apparel is Carrie’s observation of Hurstwood’s shoes, made of soft leather and elegantly “polished only to a dull shine.” This proves his superiority over Drouet, whose common leather shoes are always polished to the extreme, betraying the immaturity or vanity of an upstart. Drouet, however, is the only one among the three main characters whose status in society remains fairly constant throughout the story. Owing to her looks, Carrie’s social standing improves dramatically both in Chicago and in New York, while Hurstwood’s eventually collapses to the very bottom. In Sister Carrie, the permanence of one’s social standing has few guarantees. Hurstwood’s history illustrates how easily social status can be lost in the face of adversity. With luck and ruthless determination, upward mobility is also possible, but Dreiser’s skeptical vision makes it clear that for every success there are several failures. In contrast to high society, extreme poverty is constantly present in the city. People at the foot of the social ladder, nearly invisible to the well-to-do, beg in the streets and stand in line for a bed. When a desperate man asks for a dime, Hurstwood, still in his social and economic prime, “scarcely noticed the incident. Carrie quickly forgot.” Ironically, at the end of the story, it is Hurstwood himself who has to beg for alms. Yesterday’s achievements can turn dramatically into tomorrow’s failure. Like many American writers at turn of the century, Dreiser was influenced by Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and related social philosophies. Given the complexity of urban society as represented in the book, the idea of “survival of the fittest” may not explain any dramatic turns of plot, but it does lurk persistently behind many characters’ words and actions. The need to elevate oneself, or to maintain the image of high social standing, seems a vital instinct as success is largely based on appear-
ances, reputations, and personal connections. After Carrie’s ascent to stardom, Hurstwood, having lost his money and comfortable life, swears at a scornful theater attendant who prevents him from seeing her: “I—I hired such people as you once.” This line points at a central element of Dreiser’s commentary on society. Social hierarchies may occasionally be turned upside down and relations of power reversed, but the immense effect of such hierarchies on people’s lives remains. Markku Samela
DUBOIS, W. E. B.â•… The Souls of Black Folkâ•… (1903)
The Souls of Black Folk by W. E. B. DuBois (1868– 1963) is a foundational text in the study of American and African-American struggles, successes, and limitations during the post–Civil War era. After slavery was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment in January of 1865, African Americans began to develop in the fields of business, education, and politics. However, discrimination based on race continued to plague many African Americans as they sought these social, political, and economic advancements. DuBois compares the challenges facing blacks to these of the biblical Israelites as they sought a “Promised Land” through fruitful labor and spiritual growth. Unbeknownst to the Israelites they would have to wait another 40 years to enter this “Promised Land.” Comparably, American blacks were forced to wait in a kind of limbo, where their paths overtook their former lives as southern slaves and future lives as free and successful citizens. They experienced “double consciousness,” seeing the now free world through the eyes of both formerly enslaved and free people. DuBois’s text is filled with commandments of sorts—personal advice for blacks to live by in order to advance, while never forgetting their sorrowful past. He encourages educated blacks to teach uneducated members of their community. He coins the term “Talented Tenth,” to refer to educated blacks, whom he encourages to liberate the race through mentoring and leadership. The “Talented Tenth,” DuBois believed, would lead blacks into public influence as a respected and visible voting
The Souls of Black Folkâ•…â•… 377 population and help turn them away from black leaders such as Booker T. Washington, who promoted industrial education. For DuBois, a new soul of black folk was emerging during post-slavery that could and would help first to alleviate black social ills and ultimately elevate and transform black life from the top down. Patrice Natalie Delevante
Gender in The Souls of Black Folk
Many works of contemporary African-American literature, such as Alice Walker’s The Color Purple, Gloria Naylor’s The Women of Brewster Place, and Toni Morrison’s Sula and The Bluest Eye, elucidate the specific difficulties black women have in their struggle to overcome the legacies of slavery. Not only are they doubly oppressed, because of their race and their gender, but many black women must shoulder the matriarchal burden alone, their men having succumbed to the pain of emasculation and frustration. In The Souls of Black Folk, W. E. B. DuBois describes the suffering experienced by and the strength found in black southern women living as slaves through the Civil War, attempting to rebuild their communities during the Reconstruction era, and now gaining access to American progress and liberties. DuBois shares some of their emotional and subsequent physical responses due to war and its aftermath: Black mothers are “frightened” and unable to provide food and shelter for their children, a state that results in their now homeless husbands and children appearing “stalwart” in stature. DuBois observes black women dreaming and striving to overcome the many limitations placed on them because of southern racist attitudes. He narrates his everyday sightings and conversations with local black mothers, referring to one as a “magnificent Amazon” and praising her children as “beautiful” and “strong.” He also depicts young black women such as Josie, who uses determination to carry out maternal and domestic duties at home, labor for financial gain, and study rigorously to excel in DuBois’s classroom. DuBois, a student at Fisk University looking to practice teaching during “break,” meets Josie, a prospective student enthusiastic about learning, on his trip to find a teaching job in one of the southern
cities. Fisk’s black male students, including DuBois, regard themselves as “beyond the Veil,” a statement describing how they view themselves after securing educational advancement at Fisk to eliminate the characteristics of generations of black southerners: the “slave mentality,” or apathy, ignorance, and subservience. DuBois specifically refers to the “Veil” as a symbolic representation of the black slave mentality in force as white racist codes label blacks as being “born with a veil”; following emancipation, black slaves were further suppressed within the “veil” due to discriminatory practices in employment and higher education as well as in black voter turnout despite the sanction of the Fifteenth Amendment (1870), allowing blacks the right to vote. DuBois calls for young black America to pursue educational advancements and develop American dreams “beyond the Veil,” all the while applying forms of critical consciousness when dealing with social prejudices—“self-consciousness, self-realization [and] self-respect.” Ironically, a weary DuBois (“rest[ing]” after “cross[ing] the stream at Watertown”), has a conversation with a black woman born without the “veil,” or living as if her “veil” does not exist, for Josie “talk[s] fast and loud, with much earnestness and energy” about attending school after the war. Josie is a 20-something, brown-skinned, “thin,” and “homely” black woman, “longing” for an education and “learn[ing],” possibly at the school in the process of being built “over the hill.” DuBois not only enters into discussion with Josie about the school; he also visits her family. While meeting her mother, father, and siblings, he observes Josie’s distinct position within the family, referring to her as its “center” but also as an embodiment of both her maternal and paternal figures. Josie is prone to scold her brothers John and Jim, similar to her mother; she remains “faithful” like her father, but most important, she showcases “a certain fineness, the shadow of an unconscious moral heroism that would willingly give all of life to make life broader, deeper, and fuller for her and hers.” Josie is also a “child woman” at home, for she plays with her siblings but also sews and handles domestic duties with diligence. DuBois describes Josie as displaying similar marks of heroism within her studies, for once
378â•…â•… DuBois, W. E. B. the school opens and he begins teaching her along with her many classmates, Josie studies “doggedly,” displaying herself (first in DuBois’s eyes) as “child woman amid work and worry.” Josie already lives and studies “beyond the Veil” of both genders in black America, and she now receives instructions in the classroom from an American black who is himself “beyond the Veil.” But her family problems become “the Veil that [hangs] between [her] and Opportunity.” Josie’s financial duties to her family prevent her from attending school, especially with recent “crop fail[ures]” and local racism. Moreover, Josie suffers distress from seeing her “angry” brother, Jim, imprisoned in a Lebanon jail due to accusations of “stealing wheat,” only to witness Jim and another brother, John, steal money from her purse. DuBois links Josie’s now “thin” appearance and “silence” with her family situation, but he continues to remind the reader of Josie’s determination to persevere through her family veil, for she labors in Nashville and helps her brother, Dennis, “the carpenter,” and builder of “six” additional rooms in the family home, to further furnish and maintain the family home. Nonetheless, family woes, such as the announcement of her sister Lizzie’s pregnancy, diminish her prospects and “vision of schooldays,” and her physical appearance becomes what DuBois describes earlier as “homely.” Josie’s attempts to live, work, and learn “beyond the Veil” crumble due to the limited vision and life choices made within her family. She becomes a failed heroic figure in the end, for although she challenges and constructs new roles as a daughter, sister, worker, and student by becoming a mother, father, and primary financial provider for the family, all the while trying to maintain her work and school status, she cannot retain social and educational mobility within such complex and challenging familial roles and social responsibilities. In a later chapter in Souls, “Of the Wings of Atlanta,” DuBois calls for the black community to become cultural bearers of “knowledge” in the world so as to eliminate ignorance and encourage students such as Josie to remain students, committed to their own roles as cultural bearers. For Josie, additional support from the community may have given her the chance to remain in school; however, and perhaps nonetheless, she teaches DuBois and his readers “an unconscious
moral heroism” that remains intact throughout a most positive yet difficult life (74). Patrice Natalie Delevante
Identity in The Souls of Black Folks
In The Souls of Black Folk, W. E. B. DuBois first investigates why black identity is normally summed up by nonblacks with the question: “How does it feel to be a problem?” DuBois rarely answers this question when asked personally; rather, he sees being “a problem” as something that is “peculiar” to African Americans. He uses the metaphor of the “veil” to describe black America’s inherent peculiarity: the inability to gain access to opportunities available to nonblacks within the United States. The veil is both a blessing, because it grants blacks multiple ways of looking at the world, and a curse, because nonblacks use the veil to oppress blacks and render them invisible. DuBois refers to the ability to see the world as a Negro and a nonblack as “double sight,” a “double consciousness.” For example, the interaction between blacks and whites during slavery allowed blacks to see how whites discern and justify their “contempt and pity” of blacks. DuBois longs for blacks to overcome “the veil,” become truer Negroes and Americans, without being regarded with disdain by white America. Throughout the text, DuBois makes comparisons between black America and the biblical Jews. The Israelites wandered in the wilderness for 40 years before reaching their destination. DuBois sees a similar parallel with ex-slaves postemancipation. Blacks were granted freedom from whites—liberty, to be more exact—but in the coming years, they bore the weight of freedom with the problems caused by prejudice, harassment, poverty, homelessness, and rape, among others. DuBois refers to this as a “waste of double aims,” which causes the black artists to seek alternative ways to gain worth and purpose. Though the Freedmen’s Aid societies pushed for the legalization of black marriages, payment of black soldiers, free black education, and increased labor opportunities, as well as land ownership, they failed to make blacks permanent productive freemen due to strong outside opposition and internal poor choices.
The Souls of Black Folkâ•…â•… 379 To give readers an example of what he sees as a problematic way of thinking, DuBois critically examines the rhetoric of the black educator Booker T. Washington (1856–1915). Washington gained prominence with his founding of the Tuskegee Institute and with lectures and speeches about black life. During his speech known as the “Atlanta Address”—which DuBois contemptuously called the “Atlanta Compromise”—Washington called for blacks to postpone ambitious educational and political aspirations and the fight for civil rights and instead seek an industrial education. In other words, Washington felt that blacks had to work from the “bottom up” to secure material and industrial wealth. DuBois explains that blacks are too impatient for such gradual advancement, and he sees current social attitudes as inhibiting black intellectual and political capabilities. He calls Washington’s plan “a gospel of Work and Money” that reaffirms white America’s assumptions of blacks as simple and inferior laborers. Though many in the world deem blacks to be subhuman, fraudulent, and inferior, DuBois rejoices that black graduates of higher education are creating new black identities as teachers, principals, and presidents of colleges. He refers to them as the “Talented Tenth” and calls for black colleges to sustain popular education and the ambitions and training of the Talented Tenth. In other words, black higher education should seek to create and sustain the new Negro identity with leadership potential. Interracial dialogue and cooperation between blacks and whites are also necessary factors to salvaging the negative perceptions of African Americans and embracing the New Negro. However, though places such as the Black Belt of Georgia—once filled with slaves—contain elements of a promising new black identity, they are also filled with the realities of nihilism, ignorance, and ghetto culture, “full of untold story, of tragedy and laughter, and the rich legacy of human life; shadowed with a tragic past, and big with future promise!” Black farm labor here is tied to southern cotton production. Despite the cotton crisis within Dougherty County, for example, and though black farmers and their families live in congested and horrendous living conditions, their identities overall remained unaffected.
They are honorable persons, DuBois concludes, respecting codes such as female chastity, modesty, and marriage. He notes that in order for black laborers’ conditions to improve, there needs to be communal help and accountability such as “careful personal guidance, group leadership of men .╯.╯. to train them to foresight, carefulness and honesty.” Black laborers’ identity can this be part of the New Negro identity. DuBois also equates African-American religion as synonymous with Negro identity: “In the South, at least, practically every American Negro is a church member.” Patrice Natalie Delevante
Tradition in The Souls of Black Folks
In The Souls of Black Folks, W. E. B. DuBois refers to central, distinctive, and endearing features of African-American life during the eras of slavery and postemancipation as traditions. Traditions, such as Negro spirituals, became everyday and celebratory rituals, while other more personal actions, such as overcoming oppression through educational advancement, opened up new traditions for black progress. Blacks sang sorrow songs to reveal their despair as slaves. DuBois refers to such sorrowfully intense yet exhilarating and rhythmic “song[s] and exhortation[s]” as very telling of slaves’ longing for freedom. Sorrow songs also revealed their pleas (and even “curses”) to their Christian faith to free them from oppression. DuBois notes that slaves’ sorrow songs are essentially American: “There is no true American music but the wild sweet melodies of the Negro slave.” Blacks celebrated their freedom after the Civil War with joyous songs proclaiming liberty “shouts” because “God has brought [their] liberty” (from the Negro spiritual song “Shout for Freedom”). However, within joyous songs of freedom also came sad songs of despair, precisely because freedom came without knowledge or understanding of what to do with it once it was achieved. Southern blacks, now mostly sharecroppers, faced discrimination when seeking land ownership or schooling for their children. More educated blacks faced racism while trying to secure voting rights or seeking higher education. Once again, sorrow songs explored their anxieties with freedom and their desire to overcome such anxiety.
380â•…â•… Edwards, Jonathan DuBois disagreed strongly with leaders such as Booker T. Washington, who started a new tradition of black leadership. Washington gained prominence with a “gospel of Work and Money.” He encouraged blacks to seek industrial progress and advancements while forgoing higher education or political gains and aspirations. Overall, Washington wanted blacks to achieve in the future, but not now. DuBois, however, advocated a new black leadership that sought socioeconomic and political mobility and equal civil rights. He wanted African Americans to gain influence in higher education as trainers of black teachers and even as philanthropists. New black leadership for DuBois entailed blacks helping blacks develop and maintain healthy minds and moral personalities. In The Souls of Black Folk, DuBois praises emerging traditions of successful black leadership within businesses and the arts. He admires their moral makeup: They disprove characteristics attached to blacks during slavery, including being unfairly labeled complacent, clownish, lazy, and ignorant. However, DuBois carefully warns blacks of the pitfalls of this newly created African American, including complacency from existing progress or distractions from future progress due to the love and abuses of money. Instead, he encourages such blacks to pursue “patience, humility, manners, and taste,” but from the top of the socioeconomic ladder. Essentially, he wants them to develop successful characteristics for successful blacks. He calls this group of highly successful and educated blacks the “Talented Tenth,” and in his eyes, they are necessary for black progress and political influence. DuBois considers black religious traditions that existed during slavery as central for blacks to remember and commemorate within their newly successful lives. Such religious experiences connected slaves inextricably and “visibly” to each other, both socially and spiritually, and to God. The black church is the center for black religious connections. DuBois refers to the preacher as “the most unique personality developed by the Negro on American soil,” primarily because he is a very influential and revered person within the community, awed for his eloquence and swagger. He leads not only religious cries and mourning but also the “stamping, shrieking, and shouting” (known as “the Frenzy”) that
characterizes Negro revivals (yearly large religious gatherings within the “backwoods of the South”). The preacher possesses social and political influence, and black bishops are prominent members of the community: DuBois calls them “the most powerful Negro rulers of the world.” DuBois also mentions characteristics peculiar to African Americans outside the black church. Local priests and medicine men are also important parts of the Negro religious experience: They heal, comfort, and prophesy. Blacks also connect with other religions outside the black church, such as voodooism. These connections were originally an attempt to seek refuge and freedom from the oppression of slavery. Furthermore, some slaves deviated from their religious connections due to their lack of hope in being free. Radical blacks subsequently abandoned the church for alternative ways to cope with their fight with racism and oppression. According to DuBois, other blacks turned to crimes and other forms of violent behavior. Black traditions, as articulated in The Souls of Black Folks, are soulful expressions that continue to bring soul and black(ness) to American history and experience. Patrice Natalie Delevante
EDWARDS, JONATHANâ•… “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”â•… (1741)
A sermon delivered by the theologian Jonathan Edwards (1703–58) on July 8, 1741, in Enfield, Connecticut, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” endures as a classic of oratory and rhetoric. It provides insights into the feelings and ideologies that swept through the colonies during the First Great Awakening, a period of religious revival from about 1730 to 1755. Edwards builds his sermon from Deuteronomy 32:35—“Their foot shall slide in due time”—in an attempt to “awaken” his congregation to ideas about God’s mercy, grace, and wrath, and about the duties of Christian life. Edwards aims his message at the “unregenerate” Christian—someone who has accepted church doctrine but not yet accepted the necessity of God’s grace—and the sermon relies on an abundance of figurative language to prove that God’s grace is not
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”â•…â•… 381 obligatory and the path to hell is easily found. At one point, Edwards likens humankind’s wickedness to “lead” which drags one down “with great weight and pressure towards hell.” Held over the “pit of Hell,” a person has no refuge save for the grace of God—“all that preserves them every moment is the mere arbitrary will, and uncovenanted, unobliged forbearance of an incensed God.” Edwards’s sermon is often characterized as one of “fire and brimstone” due to its vivid imagery and frequent appeals to fear as a motivating tool. However, the sermon is also a carefully constructed piece of rhetoric, moving from theory to application and ending with a call to action—“now awake and fly from the wrath to come.” Jeff Pettineo
Fate in “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
Fate figures prominently in Jonathan Edwards’s sermon, for the passage on which the sermon is constructed deals with the idea of fate implicitly—a movement, or “sliding” toward hell. One of the main tenets of Calvinism is the idea of “unconditional election”: God chooses who will be saved based on grace and mercy. God has “worked out,” in a sense, the fates of individuals. If a person is predestined, however, what is the merit of faith or grace or deeds? The Calvinist response is that God is capable of bringing all to him in time, and human deeds and works are part of his deterministic plan. With this context in mind, Edwards demonstrates, primarily through an exposition and extension of the passage from Deuteronomy cited in the introduction, how God’s grace and mercy are able to suspend one above the “fiery pit of hell” toward which the unregenerate man is always falling. The fated nature of the unregenerate man is described as always tending toward corruption, sin, or destruction, and Edwards uses a series of metaphors to show how God is able to preserve one from falling into such a state. One of the inferences Edwards makes regarding the verse from Deuteronomy is that “They are already under a sentence of condemnation to hell.” Edwards is referring to the “unregenerate” men of his congregation, whom he likens to the “wicked
unbelieving Israelites.” He explains that although the Israelites were “God’s visible people” and “lived under the means of grace,” they decided, rather, to remain “void of counsel.” Thus, the wicked, or unregenerate, are already fated, or predestined, for hell, to the extent that God’s mercy has no obligation to save them. Edwards points to John 3:18 to support his point—“He that believeth not is condemned already”; therefore, every unconverted man is destined for hell, or as Edwards puts it, “every unconverted man properly belongs to hell; that is his place; from thence he is .╯.╯. it is the place that justice, and God’s word, and the sentence of his unchangeable law, assign to him.” Thus, he uses the first section of his sermon to provide warrants for the ideas of fate and predestination, a theoretical groundwork that he uses in turn to persuade the “unregenerate” of the necessity for accepting God’s mercy. When attempting to come to terms with the ideas of fate, it is worth considering how Edwards conceives of will, or human agency. In one line of argument, he anticipates the counterclaims against the ideas of fate, particularly entertaining the idea of ignoring the doctrine. If one attempts to reject the “knowledge” of hell, or basically the “idea” of hell, as a way of escaping the “reality” of hell, the “solution” is merely a delusion, and he hypothesizes that if one were able to talk to a person who had been damned, one might discover, according to Edwards, that the damned would confess, “No, I never intended to come here: I had laid out matters otherwise in my mind.” Thus, despite human will or agency in intent, the reality is that it is God’s will that determines an individual’s fate, though the action of accepting God’s grace is a necessary piece of the deterministic puzzle. Edwards provides the metaphor of God’s hand, constantly holding aloft the rebellious: “And there is no other reason to be given, why you have not dropped into hell since you arose this morning, but that God’s hand has held you up. There is no other reason to be given why you have not gone to hell .╯.╯.” In the last section of his sermon, Edwards appeals to the “youth” of the congregation to consider the consequences of neglect—“hardness of heart.” That is, the unregenerate will be left to bear the “fierceness and wrath of an infinite God.” How-
382â•…â•… Edwards, Jonathan ever, if a member of the church decides to accept Christ, he or she will be “born again,” as Edwards implores the unconverted to “awake and fly from the wrath to come.” With almost abusive use of “fire-and-brimstone” imagery and the constant reminders of humankind’s depravity, Edwards’s sermon provides insights into how oratory and rhetoric were used to elaborate theological concepts such as fate and will. Although the Calvinist ideas of predestination, or “unconditional election,” were not without its inherent logical entanglements and ideological challengers, Edwards’s sermon demonstrates an attempt to explain, in highly figurative language, a complex theological principle, revealing his skill as an orator, theologian, preacher, and rhetorician. Jeff Pettineo
Justice in “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
One point Jonathan Edwards stresses in his sermon is that God’s grace keeps the “unregenerate” man out of hell. Edwards tries to show that this grace is not obligatory but part of “God’s mere pleasure”—God’s “sovereign pleasure, his arbitrary will, restrained by no obligation, hindered by no manner of difficulty.” This “attitude” is what Edwards connects to God’s sense of justice. At the time Edwards gave his sermon, the North American colonies were experiencing a religious revival, and the “unregenerate man” he speaks of is the man who had not yet accepted the necessity of the grace of God as a means of salvation. Thus, Edwards’s extensive use of “fire-and-brimstone” imagery is intended to “awaken” the unregenerate to this phenomenon of grace, largely through an appeal to fear but also by attempting to demonstrate that spirituality is a duty, and God’s justice is in no way obligatory but, rather, merited. Relying on the books of Ezekiel and Proverbs, Edwards seeks to show that pity, grace, punishment are commensurate with spiritual awakening: Consider this, you that are here present, that yet remain in an unregenerate state. That God will execute the fierceness of his anger, implies, that he will inflict wrath without
any pity. When God beholds the ineffable extremity of your case, and sees your torment to be so vastly disproportioned to your strength, and sees how your poor soul is crushed, and sinks down, as it were, into an infinite gloom; he will have no compassion upon you .╯.╯. Although Edwards characterizes God as wrathful, it is a wrath borne out of a sense of right and wrong, and the faithful adherent must understand God’s sense of justice in order to avoid falling into the “fiery pit” of hell. One passage to keep in mind when studying Edwards or Calvinism is Romans 9:14–16, which discusses justice in terms of God’s mercy: “What shall we say then? Is there injustice with God? God forbid! For he saith to Moses: I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy. And I will show mercy to whom I will show mercy. So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.” Edwards describes human depravity in terms of the sliding metaphor from Deuteronomy 32:35. From this metaphor, Edwards makes several inferences about the innate depravity of humankind. One of these conclusions is that humankind is always near destruction, always “exposed” to slippery ground; another inference is that humans are capable of falling “of themselves,” meaning human will is capable of error of its own accord, not needing another’s influence to fail. Edwards’s main conclusion based on this initial series of observations is that “the mere pleasure of God” is the only thing that keeps humankind out of hell—the “irresistible grace” of God. Since God’s grace is a facet of his will, Edwards proceeds to show that God indeed has the power and authority to punish the wicked, and God is not bound in any way to display his wrath. Among other ideas, Edwards points out that “divine justice” necessitates the punishment of sin, and that lack of faith is already a condition for condemnation. Edwards relies on John 3:18 to support his claim about faith—“He that believeth not is condemned already”—and asserts that “the immutable rule of righteousness” strikes out against the wicked. Edwards makes it clear that even human will and agency cannot “protect” one from hell, for “God
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”â•…â•… 383 has so many different unsearchable ways of taking wicked men out of the world and sending them to hell, that that there is nothing to make it appear, that God had need be at the expence of a miracle .╯.╯. to destroy any wicked man, at any moment.” In addition, the “care” humankind might take to escape hell does not provide securities or guarantees as “men’s own wisdom is no security to them from death.” It should be kept in mind that “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” though widely anthologized, is only one selection from Edwards’s oeuvre, and therefore the reader should not expect to glean the entirety of Puritan cosmology and theology from one piece aimed at the “unregenerate.” However, if the piece is read in context, one may come to appreciate Edwards’s skill in delineating ideas concerning the interrelationship of grace, human behavior, and “divine justice.” Jeff Pettineo
Suffering in “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
In “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” Jonathan Edwards attempts to persuade his congregation of the importance of following a pious path due to the suffering incurred by “slipping” into sinfulness. The only thing keeping a person from slipping into hell due to sin is God’s grace—that is, according to Edwards, people are always “exposed to sudden unexpected destruction.” He relates ideas of suffering in highly figurative language, so “suffering” for the purposes of this essay will be considered from a largely psychological, emotional, and spiritual point of view, with particular attention to the kinds of images Edwards uses to illustrate his idea of God’s wrath as it is levied against the “wicked.” Edwards claims that divine justice warrants someone being cast into hell, and “justice calls aloud for an infinite punishment of their sins.” Hell is essentially a state of envelopment in God’s wrath, for Edwards asserts that the “pit of hell is prepared, the fire is made ready, the furnace is now hot, ready to receive them; the flames do now rage and glow. The glittering sword is whet, and held over them, and the pit hath opened its mouth under them.” Another image Edwards uses is that of consumption: Hell is populated with devils who are like
hungry lions, ready to devour their prey. For the purposes of persuasion, suffering is hyperbolized through these grisly images, as Edwards wants to demonstrate what the costs of not converting would be—an extreme form of spiritual suffering. “Sin is the ruin and misery of the soul,” he says. “It is destructive in its nature; and if God should leave it without restraint, there would need nothing else to make the soul perfectly miserable.” Humankind has no recourse but to accept God’s grace in order to avoid suffering, for God holds the key to redemption. Similarly, according to Edwards, God has the power to torment the wicked man in various ways: “God has so many different unsearchable ways of taking wicked men out of the world and sending them to hell, that there is nothing to make it appear, that God had need to be at the expence of a miracle, or go out of the ordinary course of his providence, to destroy any wicked man, at any moment.” Edwards also discusses suffering in terms of apprehension, the knowledge that God’s wrath is pent up, and that at any moment the tremendous power of such wrath could pour over the wicked man. Edwards uses three images to paint this picture: great waters that are dammed; a drawn bow; and the “hand of God,” which holds something loathsome like an insect or spider “over the pit of hell.” Edwards relates that the waters “increase more and more, and rise higher and higher, till an outlet is given, and the longer the stream is stopped, the more rapid and mighty its course, when once it is let loose.” Edwards describes the bow as being bent by justice and the arrow “aimed at your heart,” for only “the mere pleasure of God, and that of an angry God” is what keeps the arrow from “being made drunk with your blood.” Again, he talks of God’s “pleasure” as that which prevents the parishioner from “being this moment swallowed up in everlasting destruction.” God has no mercy on one who demands pity; instead, he “will only tread you under foot.” The type of suffering one will experience, then, is born out of God’s sense of justice, for if any one of the parishioners, says Edwards, remains in an “unregenerate state,” God will not show pity or compassion, nor will he have any “regard to your welfare.”
384â•…â•… Eliot, T. S. Although the imagery and number of examples may seem excessive to modern readers, part of the persuasive power of the piece rests on Edwards’s ability to combine theoretical ideas with practical applications, all the while employing extremely vivid images to convey ideas of spiritual suffering. While it might appear that the excessive nature of such images of suffering and wrath could turn away possible converts, Edwards uses the images, in part, to make a case for the urgency of conversion, insofar as the price of not converting is an extreme form of spiritual suffering. Jeff Pettineo
ELIOT, T. S.â•… The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrockâ•… (1915)
“The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” was T. S. Eliot’s first published poem. An early example of the modernist long poem in free verse, the poem anticipates many of the themes of The Waste Land (1922); however, its use of a clearly identified protagonist narrating a monologue to a hypnotic rhythm makes “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” a far more accessible, coherent text. Originally entitled “Prufrock Among the Women,” the poem charts the mental life—and implied psychological breakdown—of a socially awkward persona given the odd name “Prufrock.” Though the poem can be read on one level as an exploration of Prufrock’s failure to connect with women, it is perhaps more productive to perceive the poem as a wider study of the fragility and futility of human existence—that this is not just Prufrock’s “song” but society’s “song.” Perhaps this is why singing and music feature so heavily in the poem, from the musical “voices dying with a dying fall” to the mermaids “singing, each to each”: Everyone is involved in trying to communicate and make sense of the world; very few can hear or comprehend each other properly, and alienation and crises of identity ensue. Whereas The Waste Land traces such anxieties across multiple spaces and temporal periods, “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” predominantly focuses on an unspecified city (probably London) in the modern period, though it is no less intense in its
treatment of the nightmare of Western civilization at a time of unprecedented worldwide conflict. Sarah Barnsley
Alienation in “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”
“The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” is concerned with the personal and social alienation of the poem’s protagonist. Estranged from his nerves, which take leave of the body to show up like photo negatives on a magic lantern’s screen, Prufrock is unable to indulge in sensual pleasures. Like the image of the evening, which is compared to an anesthetized patient, he is numb to external reality. His auditory senses are dulled in a world where music plays in a distant room and voices are heard “dying.” Fog and smoke meanders insidiously throughout the landscape, hampering the visual senses. Eating has little pleasure for him and is associated with anxiety. A plate holds a question that Prufrock continually struggles to ask; he visualizes his own head “on a platter” (l. 82) like the head of John the Baptist; having tea is preceded by “a hundred indecisions” (l. 32) or followed by the fear that he may be called to “force the moment to its crisis” (l. 80). Eventually Prufrock is unsure whether he has the ability, or will, to eat a simple peach. He sees himself as a powerless, dehumanized creature, identifying with a cat, “muzzled” and locked out of the house like fog against closed windows, or an insect mounted on a pin, “wriggling” helplessly. As his psychological disintegration unfolds, he longs to be a pair of severed crab claws “scuttling across the floors of silent seas” (l. 74), as far removed from the human world as possible. This desire to be cut off is a result of the intense social alienation Prufrock recounts as he wanders through streets that are “half-deserted” as if in retreat from his very presence. His separation from women is articulated through a refrain set apart from the main body of the poem, mirroring Prufrock’s exclusion (“In the room the women come and go / Talking of Michelangelo” [ll. 13–14]). The reference to women moving in a group is no accident: Not only do they prefigure the group of mermaids Prufrock later encounters (who he expects will also exclude him), they contrast with
The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrockâ•…â•… 385 the men of the poem, who are referred to in the singular (Michelangelo, “the eternal Footman,” Lazarus, Hamlet, an attendant lord). Unlike the women flowing freely through the room, men are “lonely” and uncomfortable in interiors, seen “leaning out of windows” (72). The female-dominated room (a metaphor for the vagina) is a site of danger and fierce scrutiny, a room Prufrock would prefer not to enter, hoping to “descend the stair” of sexual foreplay that leads there. It is not surprising that his female companion turns away from him in the bedroom, settling a pillow down to sleep or moving from the bed to the window as Prufrock fails to understand or satisfy her. Prufrock’s alienation is intensified by the disorientating landscapes he occupies, from the dreamlike “sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells” (l. 7), which blurs the restaurant with the hospital (sawdust was spread on the floor of 19th-century operating theaters to soak up blood), to menacing scenes of hotels that offer no assurance of sleep and claustrophobic “narrow” streets that sap his energy like a “tedious argument” while threatening to turn on him with “insidious intent.” Spaces are marked by a disconcerting inertia reflecting Prufrock’s emotional and spiritual paralysis, such as the floor, which is a space for passivity and futility where the afternoon “sleeps” and “malingers” or where bodiless claws “scuttle” aimlessly, mirroring Prufrock’s experience of tea parlors as he ruminates endlessly. Prufrock’s alienation is extended to the poem’s form, which estranges the reader. A modernist reworking of the dramatic monologue, the title of the poem bears little connection to its content—this is hardly a passionate love song. The strong, hypnotic rhythm and heavy use of full and partial rhyme draws the reader in only to encounter images of disconnection, severances that are enacted in the freeverse structure of the poem where lines and stanzas of variable lengths forge short-lived connections through repeated phrases. In the persistent repetitions and frequent use of parallelisms, the poem cuts itself off from the richness and variety of language, favoring a limited pool of words and phrases evocative of Prufrock’s limited sensibility. Such alienation is typical of modernist texts, which are often concerned with the effects of rapid
social and technological change on the individual and his/her consequent estrangement from the natural world, as well such effects on the modernist artist struggling to find new artistic forms amid increasing sociopolitical fragmentations. Sarah Barnsley
Death in The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock
A meditation on life and death, T. S. Eliot’s dramatic monologue charts J. Alfred Prufrock’s social death as he wrestles with the modern world, climaxing with his physical death by drowning. The poem is replete with death imagery and famous dead figures ( John the Baptist, Lazarus) as Prufrock continually postpones asking an unspecified question (possibly “Is there an afterlife?” or “Will I be damned?”) that threatens to overwhelm and destroy him. Though he claims that there is time to “murder and create”— to live as well as to die—death haunts Prufrock’s mental landscape so relentlessly that he envisions a variety of punitive, violent ends such as decapitation and impalement. The idea that Prufrock is actually already dead is hinted at in the Latin epigraph, which presents the words of the Count Guido da Montefeltro, a damned schemer who is found in the Eighth Circle of Hell in Dante’s Inferno. The reader is left to guess whether Prufrock is another Guido, dead and continuing his confessional lines from the “hell” of the modern world, or another Dante, descending into the “underworld” of his dreams and nightmares in search of spiritual guidance. Eliot’s opening line, with its entreaty to the plural us, furthers this confusion, as does the poem’s emphasis on the past and future—Prufrock makes comparably fewer assertions in the present tense, causing the reader to doubt that he is alive in the present world. The menacing atmosphere of endless narrow, winding streets and the various oppressive parlors, stairways, and bedrooms suggest that Prufrock’s urban cityscape is a modern Inferno, each street, building, and room representing a different circle of hell as he makes his journey, or “visit,” to the depths of himself. It is no accident that the poem begins with an image of the sky and closes with an image of a funereal seabed decorated with wreathed creatures in hellish hues of red and brown. The geographical descent parallels
386â•…â•… Eliot, T. S. various descents down the “the stair” of life throughout the poem as Prufrock ruminates to the point of mental collapse and rapidly ages (as recalled by his ever-receding, greying hair) to the point of physical death. The inner circle of Prufrock’s hell is characterized not by flame but by water: He has visions of being a pair of ragged crab claws scuttling across the seabed, and it is in the chambers of the sea where he becomes entombed after being drawn (or exiled) to the margins of the beach from the city. The sea’s watery tomb was a popular romantic fantasy, seen as a portal to the lost world of classical antiquity with its promise of an ideal order. It holds similar appeal for Prufrock, who gains no pleasure from the banality of earthly living and instead seeks an elevated existence where his efforts would be “worth it,” despite his fear of death, which he personifies as a footman holding his coat as if ushering him out of a party. Prufrock is wracked with indecision, the stasis of death becoming a metaphor for his social ineptitude. His mind is pervaded by disturbing images of deathly figures as he struggles, like the lonely men in shirtsleeves, to connect with others. He associates with the anesthetized patient, with a live insect impaled on a pin, and with the ghostly movement of the city fog. Inanimate objects—particularly crockery, clothes, and food—are given unusual prominence in an increasingly inert world dominated by the image of sleep (a euphemism for death), where images of soot, smoke, and cigarette butts suggest the petering-out of life’s fire. Images of a cat licking up pools around drains (like milk from a saucer) and hollowed-out oyster shells evoke a sense of the world being sucked dry of life, mirroring Prufrock’s experience of his life being drunk and eaten up through the endless rounds of trivial tea parties. “I have measured out my life with coffee spoons,” Prufrock laments (l. 51), suggesting that his life can be measured by the number of coffee spoons he has stirred, or that his life has been ground to pieces like coffee grains. The agency implied by the active verb measured is reflective of a wider tension that runs through the poem, that of one’s control over life and death. As much as he is a modernist antihero at odds with capitalist society, Prufrock’s obsession with this
control also makes him a universal human type worthy of the public attention he so nervously shirks. Sarah Barnsley
Identity in “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”
“The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” reveals little about who the protagonist J. Alfred Prufrock is or to whom his supposed “love song” is addressed, just as we can never be sure what, exactly, is the “overwhelming question” that vexes him. We know the protagonist’s surname (itself uncommon and strange) and middle name, yet we are only offered the initial of his first name. Indeed “J” may be read as a distorted “I,” suggestive of the many estranged “I”s haunting the poem, unable to settle on a satisfactory sense of self. Prufrock visualizes himself in a variety of guises, none of them adequate to describe him. There is the “yellow fog” journeying through the streets like Prufrock, its gaseous state corresponding to Prufrock’s insubstantiality. This image is inflected with other images, suggesting the instability of identity. The fog behaves like a cat, but it also resembles a snake that “slides” through the streets, which, with his sense of thinning arms and legs, Prufrock fears he may become. Like fog, the self is transient, located in impermanent locations like “one-night cheap hotels” and rooms where people do not settle but “come and go” or lean out of windows. This transience of identity is marked by the poem’s tone and register, which continually vacillates between confidence and doubt. It is difficult to trust the poem’s voice. Prufrock contradicts himself, asserting that there is time for “a hundred visions” (l. 33), envisioning his own decapitation, but later denying prophetic ability. Though a “love song,” the only emotion Prufrock nominates is fear (“in short, I was afraid” [l. 86]). Such contradictions extend to the identity of the poem itself. Supposedly a dramatic monologue, it is not that dramatic at all. Assertive statements are quickly followed by bathetic, self-mocking phrases as Prufrock rejects the dramatic mantle, identifying instead with a marginal “attendant lord” in a Shakespearean play. It is unclear whether the poem is really a monologue, either. Prufrock seems alone, yet he refers to an
The Waste Landâ•…â•… 387 unspecified other (“you”) who may be a real companion (possibly the “one” who appears in the bedroom scenes), or another part of his own self. The poem sounds more like a dialogue between Prufrock and parts of himself, all struggling to communicate: “It is impossible to say just what I mean!” Prufrock exclaims (l. 104); “That is not what I meant, at all,” answers an anonymous voice (l. 110). The opening line may not be a request at all but a plea for release from psychic torment—“Let us go” and be at peace, the voice begs. Prufrock’s continual questions convey an anxiety about how to be and what to say and do. He is unable to fix his identity. He sees himself as insignificant as an insect, but also as an omnipotent being, capable of squeezing the universe into a ball, or able to come back, like Lazarus, from the dead, a strong identity he undermines by worrying whether, after consultation with his companion, it would really “have been worth it” to act in such ways. Prufrock agonizes about his outward appearance, how to part his hair, or how to roll the bottoms of his trousers. His preoccupation with his clothes and his rehearsal of the lives of others suggest that he has lost his own mind. Even so, his clothes threaten to quash any identity he may find in them, as he visualizes himself impaled on his necktie pin or his coat held by “the eternal Footman” of death. People appear as fragments, not as knowable entities, in a social world where one is expected to “prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet” (l. 27)—everyone hides behind a mask. Images of body parts and clothes prevail. Women are skirts trailing across the floor or pairs of eyes and arms, accompanied by the social debris of teacups, porcelain, cakes, ices, toast, and marmalade; we come to know the pieces that surround people rather than the people themselves. Impersonal pronouns pervade the poem, particularly they and them. Such fragmented, distant identities reflect Prufrock’s internal collapse. Like fog, he eventually disintegrates, drowned by unspecified human voices, in closing lines that break up and break loose from the main body of the poem. This collapse of Prufrock’s identity can be read as a metaphor for the breakdown in social cohesion as Eliot may have experienced it, writing during the First World War,
a theme at the core of his epic work The Waste Land (1922). Sarah Barnsley
ELIOT, T. S.â•… The Waste Landâ•… (1922)
The Waste Land is divided into five sections. In the first, “Burial of the Dead,” T. S. Eliot (1888–1965) examines the fragmentation of Western European culture after World War I. Through the use of the fortune teller Madame Sosostris, he sets the poem as a blending of both past references and future prophecy. In the second section, “A Game of Chess,” Eliot looks at the social fragmentation of English society and particularly at the impact the war has had on women. In the third section, “The Fire Sermon,” Eliot continues his examination and joins the disparate parts of the poem together in the figure of Tiresias, the blind Greek prophet who is both male and female. This use of the ancient prophet further enforces the blurring between past reference and future prophecy. In the fourth section, “Death by Water,” Eliot uses the figure of the drowned Phoenician sailor to demonstrate the cyclical nature of the events of early 20th-century history. These are mainly the social decay accelerated by the war and the war brought on by the social decay of the European nations. Finally, in the last section, “What the Thunder Said,” Eliot attempts to find a solution within the Grail quest and the Fisher King, but he is left with only the fragments of the poem, which must be interpreted differently by each reader, just as the thunder of the Hindu parable is interpreted differently by the different factions who hear it. The poem closes with a truncated blessing or benediction and ends in the same way in which it began—as a heap of broken images. Jeremy Brown
Alienation in The Waste Land
Alienation can be described as a form of isolation in which the alienated person feels that all the world has become strange. T. S. Eliot’s poem The Waste Land demonstrates this feeling admirably and is one of the best examples of this experience in 20thcentury literature. The poem’s structure (consisting of five widely differing sections), its use of allusions,
388â•…â•… Eliot, T. S. and its fragmentary nature all help to promote a feeling of alienation. Much of The Waste Land is composed of allusory passages that make use of historical and literary references to weave a narrative. These passages were difficult even for readers of Eliot’s time, and Eliot himself provided footnotes. By incorporating so many sources, he guaranteed that his poem would be comprehensible to only a few dedicated readers who must be willing to engage actively with the poem. These allusions provide a link from the past to the poem’s present. However, Eliot suggests in several places in the poem that these old ideas and stories are no longer relevant. In fragmented, postwar Europe, where traditions and old alliances contributed to conflict, the past is a hindrance as much as an aid. The poem’s structure consists of five sections. Each has its own title to set it off from the others, and each takes up a different set of characters for its themes. In “The Burial of the Dead,” which depicts a vision of a shattered Europe after World War I, spring is inverted. What is traditionally a time of birth and new growth is here presented as a time of dying. “A Game of Chess” looks at the personal consequences of the war and its effect on the psyche of people not directly involved by depicting a couple plagued by memories of the dead and the loss of confidence brought by war and the modern era. “The Fire Sermon” explores the passing away of the old London and the rise of the new (as shown by the holiday-makers gone and the rendezvous with the bored typist). “Death by Water” shows a metaphorical passing of 19th-century materialism through the passing of Phlebas the Phoenician. Metaphorically, Phlebas represents the increasingly alienation of modern Britons after the war, an alienation from which they would not be saved. Finally, “What the Thunder Said” shows the painful attempt to build a new Europe in the face of the old Europe’s ruins. The use of the Hindu parable of the thunder’s speaking shows how different factions interpreted this rise from the ruins of war. By addressing different issues in the five sections, Eliot shows the disjunctions present in the postwar condition. These disjunctions are also shown in the allusions in the poem.
The poem’s fragmentary nature reflects this truth as well. The poem is a jumble of images, references, and conversations. The Fisher King of the fifth section wishes to fit the fragments together into a comprehensible whole but cannot (as shown by the shantih invocation, which is not preceded by its traditional “om,” the symbol of unity). Eliot says in his footnotes that Tiresias, the blind prophet from Greek mythology, joins all the characters together in one personage, but Tiresias is impotent to affect the situation and can only watch and suffer the pains and agonies of the others. This lack of agency is characteristic in an alienated condition as characters feel isolated and unable to affect the strange new world that confronts them. The fragments, too, by their juxtaposition, often show the dislocation felt by Europe after the war. Glories of the past are set against sordid affairs of the present, and neither benefits by this linking. Eliot’s fragmented and allusive style, which requires footnotes to understand fully, forces the reader to struggle to read the poem. This struggle—coupled with the juxtaposition of old and new, allusion and poetic depiction—demonstrates both the isolation of the modern individual in the postwar culture and the strangeness of that postwar culture, which rejects old traditions and models for behavior. Jeremy Brown
Futility in The Waste Land
Futility is an important theme throughout T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land. The struggle to accept the incomprehensible loss of life in World War I is inherent in the poem’s fragmentary nature. The multiple allusions to works that require footnotes to understand them and the continual breaking in mid-narrative all point to futility as a major thought in the work. “The Burial of the Dead” aptly reflects this fragmentation. There are only a few connected bits of narrative: the Hyacinth Girl’s story, the Lithuanian’s story, the trip to Madame Sosostris, and the encounter with Stetson. None are given a satisfactory end, and all show how the modern world, especially World War I, has smashed lives. However, even more disturbing than these microstories are
The Waste Landâ•…â•… 389 the fragments that serve to connect them. The story of Tristan and Isolde, which is referred to as a story of thwarted love, continues this theme. Also, in this section the readers are given the promises of seeing something greater than their shadows, but nothing is ever produced. The reader is told in the section’s final lines that the narrator is the double of the reader, but this suggestion is never brought into play again, leaving the reader to question this proposition. “The Game of Chess,” which follows part 1, sustains two major narratives. The first is the discussion of what to do. The conclusion is: nothing. The narrator finally suggests several distractions, ending with a game of chess. How will this cure the nerves of the woman who asks what to do? The answer is: probably not much. In the same way, the discussion between the narrator of the pub story and Lil ends before we truly find out the ending. Before we can find out whether the narrator is a well-meaning friend or someone who schemes for the attention of Lil’s man Albert, the bartender calls for last drinks. In “Fire Sermon,” Eliot introduces the figure of the blind prophet Tiresias, whom he claims joins all the characters of the poem into one consciousness. Tiresias sees and suffers the fates of the various characters but can do nothing to prevent them. The tryst between the typist and her lover is a good example. The man comes and moves immediately to a sexual encounter while the typist is merely glad that he is done and gone away. Tiresias suggests in the section’s final lines that history repeats itself through the comparison of Carthage with London. This idea is continued in “Death by Water.” The maelstrom of “Death by Water” that passes Phlebas through the stages of his life and back shows the utter futility and desperation of the modern condition. The whirlpool passes Phlebas from stage to stage and acts upon him from outside, forcing him into various positions. The new truth of modernism, as demonstrated by World War I, is that men and women are controlled by the society around them to a greater extent than even before. In “What the Thunder Said,” we see the theme of futility most clearly. The trek into the waterless mountains and the search for a grail that cannot be
found offers a clear sense of futility. The Fisher King cannot be healed, cannot fit all of the fragments together and, like Coriolanus, struggles in a prison of his own making. In the end, the poet closes with a blessing that is stripped of meaning by its partial utterance. Traditionally, “om” would have preceded shantih in the benediction. Without “om,” the word of completeness, the shantih becomes an empty form that has lost its meaning. Throughout The Waste Land, Eliot develops the theme of futility through the medium of outside pressure. The whirlpool in “Death by Water” is the most obvious, but the crowds moving over London bridge and the public opinion represented by Lil’s friend all point to peer pressure and societal forces that push and pull the individual. There is nothing to be done unless this societal ill, this need for the grail, is solved, and Eliot suggests that it cannot be solved. The end of the poem leaves little doubt that in a godless, materialistic world, there is no way out unless we, the prisoners, reject the prison we have been born into. Jeremy Brown
Tradition in The Waste Land
The Waste Land is a poem that both embraces and shrinks from tradition. The poem eschews traditional verse forms and structures, but at the same time it is built of allusions to traditional works. Some of this ambiguity can be explained through T. S. Eliot’s later views of the poetic tradition. Eliot believed that each poet must make his or her own place in the poetic tradition, which he explains in the essay “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” The poet, according to Eliot, must be aware of his tradition and must attempt to bring something new into it. The poet should be conscious of the past but not let any youthful infatuations guide his vision of how to create: The poet should create something new and adjust the tradition to accept this new item. This process can clearly be seen in The Waste Land. The poem is extremely conscious of the past but radically breaks with it. There are no rhymes (except in a few sections), and the vast majority of the poem is in no uniform meter. In this way it rejects the traditions of 19th-century poetry and attempts to develop something new.
390â•…â•… Ellison, Ralph However, each of these novel techniques has a basis in the canon. For example, Walt Whitman used long nonrhyming lines, and William Blake created his own mythology, which he used in allusory fashion in his poetry. Eliot draws on the work of older poets in his work: Homer, William Shakespeare, and Charles Baudelaire. Further, he incorporates popular song material in the form of Richard Wagner’s treatment of the Tristan and Isolde story. By means of the allusions, Eliot reminds the reader of the tradition he is breaking and reshaping. In addition to Wagner, Eliot incorporates many other traditional sources throughout the poem. His use of the Grail story in part 5, “What the Thunder Said,” evokes the legend of King Arthur. In World War I, the British had depicted themselves as noble warriors going to save a corrupted continent from itself, but they had not proven to be as noble as they wished. As the war drew on, the British were engaged in deadly trench warfare that destroyed the countryside of the people they were “saving.” Heroes usually came home dead or disabled, and the trenches killed the land. The use of the Fisher King, the wounded lord of a dying land who can only be healed by the Grail, captures this state of affairs nicely. The British after the war are wounded in spirit if not in body (see the discussion between the two women at the end of “A Game of Chess”). The Grail was not found—cannot be found—and so society is locked in the self-perpetuating prison of its own shattered past. This use of legendary material is not the only one in the poem. Eliot also uses the real figures of Elizabethan politics to demonstrate London’s current poverty (in “Fire Sermon”). All of these references, just as with the poetic and musical references, serve to demonstrate the fragmentation of society after the war and the breakdown of tradition. This fragmentation also supports the themes of alienation and futility in the poem. The use of allusions reminds the reader of “old times” which are now gone forever due to World War I. The nontraditional presentation demonstrates the ruptured state of society and the need to create new patterns from the chaos of the Great War. Eliot’s poem creates a novel approach to poetry through the destruction and reshaping of the poetic tradition. Jeremy Brown
ELLISON, RALPHâ•… Invisible Manâ•… (1952)
In 1953, Ralph Ellison (1914–94) was awarded the National Book Award for Invisible Man, his only novel published during his lifetime. (Juneteenth was published in 1999) Invisible Man uses first-person narration to present the experiences and reflections of the unnamed black protagonist. Set in the 1950s, it begins in the narrator’s current home underground and moves backward to his childhood in the rural South and his years at a black state college. Expelled from the school, his dream of becoming an educator is shattered, and the narrator moves north, to Harlem. Here he works for Liberty Paints before joining the Brotherhood, a communist-styled group that works for equality. Continuously engaged in a process of self-discovery, he struggles to find an identity for himself outside the expectations and desires of powerful and hierarchical social structures. As he journeys from south to north, the Invisible Man interacts with a number of significant characters, including Mr. Norton, a white trustee of the college; Mr. Bledsoe, the college’s black president; Jim Trueblood, a black sharecropper who has fathered children by his wife and daughter; Mary, a Harlem woman who rents rooms to those down on their luck; Brother Jack, a leader of the Brotherhood; Tod Clifton, a fellow Brother; Ras the Exhorter, the leader of a black nationalist group; Rinehart, a man whose identities arise completely from the projections of others; and the narrator’s deceased grandfather. Through the interactions between these characters, Ellison explores such themes as race, violence, the American dream, innocence and experience, oppression, and memory. Ideas and music from figures such as Booker T. Washington, Marcus Garvey, Louis Armstrong, and Bessie Smith form some of the novel’s historical references. Invisible Man is a visceral novel attuned to the complex histories of the African-American freedom movements. Megan Kuster
Identity in Invisible Man
The narrator’s search for identity is one of the most important themes in Invisible Man. In the novel, identity is connected to the narrator’s self-percep-
Invisible Manâ•…â•… 391 tion, his ambition, and his view of society. Identity is also related to race and social class, and by the end of the novel it is clear that the narrator’s blackness and poverty facilitate his choice of invisibility. The mutability of identity is one feature of this theme that is explored throughout the novel. In his youth, the narrator aspires to become an educator at the black college, a position of power that would raise his social status. He is ready to do anything in order to achieve his ambition. When the dream is shattered while the narrator is looking for work in Harlem, he begins to view his earlier self as naive. At this early stage in his self-awareness, the narrator still desires to be a leader and believes he can outrun those who would destroy his hopes. When he is given a new name by the Brotherhood, he begins to see himself as a leader within his Harlem community. As he becomes more deeply involved with the Brotherhood, he discovers that community goals are as important as individual ambition. His own ambition for power is subsumed by his commitment to the Brotherhood. This sense of self, rooted in a group identity, is shaken when the Brotherhood decides to investigate claims of opportunism being made against the narrator. After witnessing the death of Clifton, the Invisible Man delivers a rousing eulogy for his friend, believing still in the ideals of the Brotherhood and confident about his place within it. When he takes on the disguise of Rinehart and tricks people into believing he is someone he is not, he realizes that perception of reality is imperfect. Gradually, amid all these changes in selfperception, the Invisible Man comes to conclude that others have used him as a material object, as a disposable resource, to achieve their own ambition of becoming more powerful. By the end of the novel, the narrator wants an identity that can protect him from those who would oppress him. The choice of invisibility is a subversive one because it claims the same space, the space of the unnoticed and unimportant, that others had previously consigned him to in order to accomplish their own gain. He can claim this identity as a liberating one because his expectations and ambitions have changed from the desire to become individually powerful to experiencing the absurdity of reality that is observable from his position of invisibility. The
idea that identity is changeable is linked at various points in the novel to changes in the narrator’s self-perception. Identity, as it is explored in Invisible Man, is a relational concept. Who a person is and what a person imagines he is depends on his relationships, experiences, and interactions with others. The identity of invisibility that the narrator chooses by the end of the book has both benefits and drawbacks. The biggest advantage associated with the narrator’s invisibility is the freedom he feels from not participating in the oppressive hierarchical systems of value determined by economic standing and skin color. Yet for the narrator, invisibility is also an isolating condition. By the end of the novel, he states that writing down his experiences has led him to see patterns in the chaos and absurdity that order society’s certainties. This realization leads him to declare that he will live above ground again. He will come out of hibernation and cast off his invisibility. The Invisible Man does choose to live outside the established and conventional social boundaries, and his ability to achieve this freedom is related to society’s willingness to conspire in his invisibility based on his skin color and economic standing. Identity is thus both an individual statement of claim and a relational agreement according to social expectations. It is appropriate that in this novel where identity is a fundamental concern, the narrator’s name, one of the most obvious markers of identity, remains unknown. Megan Kuster
Memory Invisible Man
From dreams and amnesia to a collective past invoked through symbolic objects and oratory, the relationship between memory and history is an important theme in Invisible Man. Often, the narrator’s experiences with memory provoke him to a new understanding of himself in the present. For example, the Invisible Man remembers his dead grandfather through dreams and visions at various points in the novel. The narrator’s memory of his grandfather’s last words, when he declared his view that one should use subversion and resistance strategies to confront systems of oppression, surfaces at several points in the novel. Another recurrent memory associated with the grandfather initially
392â•…â•… Ellison, Ralph comes to the narrator in a dream-vision following the Battle Royal and his subsequent speech. In this vision, the grandfather presents the narrator with a gift. It is a briefcase containing many envelopes representing years and an engraved memo containing the narrator’s inheritance. The memo is a letter that authorizes the recipient to use hope and delay to run the narrator ragged. Initially, the narrator is unable to interpret the deathbed memory and his dream. These two memories involving the grandfather appear at various points throughout the narrative as the Invisible Man becomes increasingly aware of his own individual confinement as the result of racial expectations and the power of social grouping. The memory of the grandfather comes to represent an important example of how to survive with selfawareness, integrity, and dignity in a segregated culture. The relationship between memory and identity appears again in scenes in the factory hospital where the narrator is recovering after a work-related accident he suffered while employed by Liberty Paints. Neither the reader nor the narrator know how long he has been a patient, but it is clear that he has been subjected to electroshock therapy, which has destroyed his sense of self. Initially, he cannot remember anything about himself: not who he is, not his name, not his mother. He begins to recover his identity only when a lab technician questions him about Buckeye the rabbit. For the narrator, this name triggers memories of childhood rhymes and stories that link him with a folkloric past and with an African-American oral history. Significantly, it is at this point of memory that the Invisible Man begins to associate his confinement with the inability to articulate who he is, and thus to associate his freedom with the ability to remember, name, and remake his identity. There are many images and objects in the novel that arouse the collective memory of slavery in the mind of the narrator. His observation of an elderly couple’s free papers and a photograph of Abraham Lincoln during the eviction scene is one instance. Another instance is when Brother Tarp presents the Invisible Man with the broken shackle that had bound his ankle when he worked on a chain gang. To the narrator, the severed shackle represents a link
between Brother Tarp and his ancestors, many of whom lived in slavery. Linking history and memory, the narrator compares the shackle to a wristwatch. Communal memory, past and present, is also invoked through language, speeches, and song. The scene of Brother Clifton’s funeral procession is an example of communal memory. Initially, it is the music of a slave spiritual, sung by an old man, that moves the funeral attendants and prompts the narrator to recall memories of the college and of home. Primed by the song, the Invisible Man delivers a eulogy for Brother Clifton that connects the violence and injustice of this one death with the violent and unjust deaths of many others. He is telling an old story, he says, and in each repetition of the eulogy, the narrator challenges his audience to forget the story, thereby making it impossible to forget. In Invisible Man, communal and individual memory overlap, converge, and separate in complex ways. Ellison’s representation of how history and the past inform present identities and collective memory is a central feature of the narrator’s ability to become self-aware. Megan Kuster
Race in Invisible Man
Stereotypes, the complex relationship between skin color and identity, and ideas about racial equality are some of the many ways in which race becomes an important theme throughout Invisible Man. Ellison dramatizes racial stereotyping when the narrator first meets the members of the Brotherhood. One of the Brothers antagonistically asks him to sing, arguing that all black people sing. The Brother himself attempts a song. Before the Invisible Man can respond to this, other Brothers respond that the narrator will not sing. Tensions escalate, and the man who made the original request for a song is escorted out of the party. One of the members approaches the narrator on her way out and says she understands that he is there to join the struggle, not to entertain the Brothers. The narrator reflects that while he does resent that others believe that all black people are gifted singers, he also wonders if there might be a way that the Brothers could have asked him to sing that would not have been interpreted as being malevolently motivated.
“The American Scholar”â•…â•… 393 Other examples of racial stereotyping in the novel cause more anger and are related to more dire consequences. On the street one day, the narrator comes across Tod Clifton, a friend who has left the Brotherhood and is now selling sambos, dolls modeled on an offensive stereotype, to a sizable crowd on the sidewalk. The narrator is both angry and confused about why Clifton would choose to make money by selling caricatures of blackness. The sambos were representations of servile and “happy” slaves, and they were sometimes invoked to rationalize slavery. To the narrator, the sambos that Clifton is selling represented the erasure of the violent historical experience and legacy of slavery. The narrator is angered by this kind of stereotyping, which ignores and makes light of the experiences of black Americans who were dehumanized by the more powerful. He has a similar reaction to Mary’s black-boy bank. The Invisible Man’s changing identity takes place alongside societal ideas about race, although it is not only these notions that shape his identity. The way he is treated by other characters and the employment options that are available to him in the novel are conditioned by social conceptions of race. He is treated as a disposable commodity by Dr. Bledsoe, Liberty Paints, and even members of the Brotherhood, both because he is black and because of individuals’ greed for power and the factory’s greed for wealth. However, the narrator also chooses to see blackness as an agent of possibility. He is able to maintain his invisibility, a position that he perceives to offer him infinite possibilities, at least partially because he is black. The differences between race and cultural identity are also important in the novel. For example, while Harlem represents a relatively defined community, it is not a completely unified neighborhood as there are tensions between southern and local blacks. In this fictionalized representation of Harlem, there are also different methods of working toward racial equality. Brother Tarp hangs a portrait of Frederick Douglass in his office. Douglass’s Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself was one of the most influential and widely circulated among abolitionists. In the early Battle Royal scene,
the speech that the narrator delivers is taken from Booker T. Washington, a historical figure whom some in the Brotherhood would have the narrator aspire to become. In the speech, it is argued that racial equality can be achieved through self-help, by pulling up oneself by the bootstraps, and did not demand that blacks gain equal political rights immediately. Ras the Exhorter represents a more militant view of gaining equality, arguing that violence is necessary, as is limiting group membership to include only those from the black community. Ellison treats race as a complex theme in Invisible Man. This is an appropriate approach, considering that the novel was set in a time when multiple and shifting ideas about race were part of the social reality. Megan Kuster
EMERSON, RALPH WALDOâ•… “The American Scholar”â•… (1837)
“The American Scholar” was one of the early addresses Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–82) delivered at Harvard University. At this time, Emerson was establishing himself as a lecturer, and he delivered this address to Harvard’s Phi Beta Kappa Society on August 31, 1837. “The American Scholar” includes many ideas that would become more prominent throughout Emerson’s middle and later works. The main idea behind “The American Scholar” lies in Emerson’s symbolic notion of “Man Thinking.” Emerson sets out first to delineate “Man Thinking” because the common notions of an education and scholars have moved away from this idea. Since he is addressing a university society, it is important that Emerson make this distinction in this particular environment. Much of what distinguishes “Man Thinking” from a thinking man centers on Emerson’s ideas of past and present, both of which remain fundamental concerns in the address. Emerson argues that the role of the intellectual consists of a break from past ideas and an education in nature, books, and action. Richly filled with images of education, the individual and society, and spirituality, “The American Scholar” addresses a need for Emerson’s America to promote and embrace the freedom
394â•…â•… Emerson, Ralph Waldo of reason. The address lays out a path of American thought that he sees as emancipation from old ideas and institutional forms, and he argues for a provocative new form of American intellectual experience. The fundamental issue “The American Scholar” sets forth is the creativity of originality and the scholar’s duty to pursue this freely. Michael Modarelli
Education in “The American Scholar”
Ralph Waldo Emerson’s address to the Phi Beta Kappa Society at Harvard in August 1837 positions the “scholar,” in an abstract sense, as the character who receives education, which Emerson considers of the highest import to truly live in the world. The archetypal scholar serves as a model for members of the society. Emerson begins with a comparison of the commencement of a new school year to a club, a type of education that merely passes around “letters” of old. In other words, he calls for new letters to come from an American education. From the start, Emerson’s speech looks toward a new day when the sluggish intellect of America will stop depending on books and knowledge from past civilizations and “foreign harvests.” The American scholar, then, will move forward in his own right, apart from other countries and civilizations, to promote a new brand of American thought and education. This theme of education must, according to Emerson, remain in the present, which is an idea that serves as the foundation for what follows in the speech. The American Scholar must educate himself in the lands, nature, writings, and thoughts of America. Instead of learning from books of the past, the true scholar must become an active “Man Thinking.” As in other professions, Emerson warns, there lies a danger in becoming the thing that one does; so it is with “Man Thinking.” Like “Man on the Farm,” who, without active participation and enthusiasm, becomes simply the farmer, “Man Thinking” can often degenerate into a mere thinker. Emerson warns that education must always propel one forward, away from the past. Essentially, the active life in all respects is far better than the passive life. Since “Man Thinking” exists only in action, thought must direct action. And here is where Emerson claims his idea of education connects the
two. He argues that all humans have the power to achieve the highest state of intellect because every man is a student for the world’s education, and Nature and the world’s writings are available to all. For Emerson, education comes from three main sources: nature, books, and action. Nature exists as a mystery to the scholar—it is boundless, circular, and exciting. Even more, nature resembles human spirit; it is the soul imprinted. America serves as a perfect model for nature since it is yet undiscovered and free from the history of past civilizations. Books are records of man’s thoughts in these past civilizations and are useful; however, when ill used, they are poor instruments of education. Books should be used simply as part of a system of education, which means as a stepping-stone, not as an end themselves. Books always look backward, while “Man Thinking” should look forward in action. Action, says Emerson, has value as a resource of the mind—the mind thinks and the body replicates thought into action. Emerson states that thinking is the “function,” but living is the “functionary.” To live is to be strong to think and act. Once educated thus, according to Emerson, the scholar has duties to keep his education moving forward through dissemination. Similar to notions in the actual education of the scholar, past and present play a great part in his duties. Emerson again asserts that the scholar only use the past for reflection; the focus should be on the present. His abstraction of the scholar then begins to shift to individuals. Emerson claims that the “universal mind took through the eyes of one scribe” and can pass that on to future generations. In other words, the duty to educate continues the progress of every person, and there exists a oneness or singularity of mind in all individuals. To that end, proper education—acquired in nature, books, and action—must flow from each person like an electrical charge, sending currents to every individual. Emerson wants this to especially happen in the United States, as the young country struggles to shape its own independent identity. In essence, this serves as Emerson’s vision for a greater and more intellectual society. Often called the American “Intellectual Declaration of Independence,” “The American Scholar”
“The American Scholar”â•…â•… 395 points the way to a new horizon for the United States, where the prototype American scholar must stake out an education from all that has come before him and from the presence of nature to form a new, intellectual nation. The American Scholar becomes, in a sense, the prototypical Emersonian man—independent, patient, freethinking, and in tune with nature. Complacency and decorum are evils that pervade the education of Americans, primarily because they value the old and shun the new. Emerson wants to free America from the binds of European education and begin a new American education with the students born in the land—an education born in the United States, for its people, and by the young scholars of the new country. Michael Modarelli
Individual and Society in “The American Scholar”
The individual and society play a fundamental role in Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “The American Scholar.” The main themes consist of the past and present, the individual’s engagement with a past society that has been handed to her or him, and the relation of the individual to her or his society. Throughout the address, Emerson constantly refers back to these main ideas, emphasizing the struggle the individual must undertake to break free from societal pressures and expectations. Emerson first addresses the link between the individual and society. For Emerson, individuals who are not connected in an organic way to society, meaning they perform for themselves, are “amputated” from the body of society. In a society where this happens, individuals exist only as placeholders, such as “farmer” or “priest.” When individuals strive to become more than a vocation, Emerson argues, they become attached to the great intellect within each of us; then the individual becomes “Man Thinking.” “Man Thinking” steps outside of his vocative placeholder and into society to intermesh with others and past societies, to learn from everything, to become more aware of his place in the link in history. This idea blends easily into Emerson’s notions about nature as an entity. For Emerson, nature is
circular: There is no beginning or end—much like patterns of history. When we are very young, we see individual patterns in things; we notice separate entities. “Man Thinking,” however, understands the links between the individual and society, between the leaf and the tree, between the past and the present. Given this idea, then, the individual should not strive to become a mere scholar, separate from the society within which he lives; he should become more a part of the whole, engaging with the people and culture around him. Living is the most important aspect for the individual, living within and interacting with her or his society. In fact, Emerson claims it is the job of the individual scholar to show men the real truths amid the world of appearances—in this case, the individual “parts” of the organic whole—and to help elucidate how the many parts fit into the whole. Moreover, the scholar should show how the tangible goals for which people strive, such as fame and money, are but elements of the organic unity of all things. Again, this unity appears most evident in nature, but, Emerson argues, we are a part of nature—our past and present—so this translates to society. Under the great pressures of history, the individual scholar must veer toward a new future, always moving, never static. This is a problem Emerson has with books, which contain the stagnant written history, not the malleable future or the active present. Although books are good to a certain degree—for they are, as Emerson says, written records of past societies—they should not be used to guide the focus of the individual or society. As “Man Thinking,” the individual must create his own society, free from the chains of the past and linked in an organic unity with his fellow citizens. For Emerson, the individual and society exist as a tension, or interplay, between the smallest part of a unit and its greater mass. In a democracy, these are two inseparable things; an individual must represent, to a larger degree, her or his society. Furthermore, it is because the individual stands for the society that Emerson takes great pains to enumerate these ideas. A society full of individuals who embrace the notion of “Man Thinking” would, in his mind, become a vastly superior growing and organic unity to societies of the past. In fact, nature, too, would
396â•…â•… Emerson, Ralph Waldo become incorporated into the mix, thus continuing to provide a wellspring of eternal truths to those for whom these lofty goals are open. Emerson’s vision of “Man Thinking” as it is pronounced in “The American Scholar” is a picture of a vibrant and growing democratic society, fraught with active and connected individuals. The venue for the address is important, as Emerson wants the Harvard students to be indoctrinated into this line of thought, thus propagating it throughout the rest of a young and vibrant America. Michael Modarelli
Spirituality in “The American Scholar”
In “The American Scholar,” Ralph Waldo Emerson’s spirituality comes through his notions of transcendentalism. For Emerson, nature, as an entity, exists as one of the three educators of the scholar, the other two being action and books. The past is a tyrant; the scholar must study the present in order to be free from the chains of the past. In nature, Emerson argues, we can see the shadow of our own existence; it is the raw material within which patterns of our own spiritual lives exist, and the scholar is one who most engages nature and mines it for these ideas. Boundless nature, argues Emerson, has no beginning or end; instead, it is a circular spiritual power always existing for itself. In this way, nature resembles the spirit, or soul, of man. Each soul exists individually and collectively, part of the larger web of nature. Emerson begins his address by including the audience in his speech. The gathering consists of would-be scholars, members of the Phi Beta Kappa Society, and Emerson quickly debunks the notion that the scholar’s job is merely to become the romantic intellectual. Instead, scholars should remain open to new possibilities and spiritually and intellectually receptive to others. Indeed, Emerson patterns his scholar after God’s pattern of nature: The role of the scholar is to create. But first the scholar must create himself, which is the basis for “Man Thinking.” Yet the scholar begins to classify. Emerson claims that this classifying leads “Man Thinking” back to the past, where he becomes subordinated once again. Hence, books—the literature,
histories, and ideas of the past—can only serve one to an extent. Perhaps the most important idea Emerson wants to get across to his audience lies in his idea of spirituality, which underlies everything else in the address. He seeks to explain that when man can “read” God correctly, he needs no other readings or teachings. And God, for Emerson, can be found within nature. Given this idea, then, events and substances in nature are symbols of spiritual facts. In fact, man exists at the spiritual center of the universe, and ultimately, the keys to this universe already exist within in man. This idea forms the heart of Emerson’s transcendentalism. The structure of nature, the universe, and everything existing within, structures itself on man, and vice versa. So when Emerson discusses “Man Thinking” as man in action, he means that “Man Thinking” is in touch with his very nature. “Man Thinking” realizes the ultimate doctrine of himself and therefore the fundamental structure of nature and God’s pattern. “The American Scholar” is one of the first instances in which Emerson’s transcendentalism comes to the fore. Written for scholars, the address serves two distinct purposes: to promote a shift away from the burgeoning mercantile and capitalistic trends of the day toward a more spiritual view, and to illustrate this spiritual shift in the nature and duties of the scholar. Emerson acknowledges the draw of money, fortune, and fame, but he argues against this worldview. Instead, he says, the outward world exists as an appearance; the inner world, as seen by the web of nature, is divine. Any man who finds the connection of the soul with God will be an American scholar. He will be “Man Thinking,” and he will see the patterns of God in himself and in nature. But the scholar has certain duties, Emerson is quick to point out. The scholar must, with this spiritual connection, study nature and books. Most important, the scholar must remain active, an active, living divinity of reason existing within the soul. Emerson’s “The American Scholar” addresses a fundamental spiritual crisis arising in a United States on the brink of industrial explosion. In order to get back to reality—for Emerson, reality exists as spirituality in connection with its divine
“The Divinity School Address”â•…â•… 397 source—the American scholar must lead the way. The American scholar, in this sense, needs first to develop an American spirituality, so the American spirit can drive “Man Thinking” on his way. And, Emerson, hopes, this American spirit will continue in the minds and hearts of men and be passed along, so a truly unique, and new, generation of Americans will flourish. Michael Modarelli
EMERSON, RALPH WALDOâ•… “The Divinity School Address”â•… (1838)
Ralph Waldo Emerson delivered the “Divinity School Address” to the faculty, graduating class, and guests at Harvard Divinity College on July 15, 1838. In this talk, later published as an essay, Emerson described the problems he saw in Christianity at the time and urged his listeners toward an understanding of spirituality that he hoped would restore to religion the life it had lost. He referred to two specific problems with Christianity. First, he said that Christianity had done what religion historically has tended to do: It had replaced the personal connection to spiritual law with words and forms and rituals. This had sapped the vitality out of preaching and therefore sapped the religious and spiritual vitality of the American people. The result was a lack of commitment to the kinds of spirituality that generate and nurture a meaningful religious practice. Emerson’s proposal for revitalizing religion can be summed up with a quote from paragraph 34 of “The Divinity School Address”: “The remedy” for religion’s problems, he says, “is, first, soul, and second, soul, and evermore, soul.” Emerson is not specific about how his listeners might attain greatness of soul; such specificity would have been counter to his belief in the individual’s ability to connect directly to spiritual law. This belief—that people can transcend the constraints of physical and social context and access the divine for themselves—was the heart of transcendentalism, a philosophical movement in which Emerson was a leading figure, and the heart of his spirituality as well. Sarah Perrault
Religion in “The Divinity School Address”
“The Divinity School Address” reflects Ralph Waldo Emerson’s desire to rescue religion from dogma by infusing religious practice—in particular, Christian practice—with spirituality. Emerson located the source of all religions, and the basis for human civilization, in a common spiritual impulse that “lies at the foundation of society, and successively creates all forms of worship,” but he believed that the Christianity of his time had lost touch with that impulse. Emerson was well schooled in Christian theology, having graduated from the Harvard Divinity College and been ordained as a Unitarian minister in 1829. He served in the ministry for three years in the Second Church in Boston but resigned in 1832 because of theological differences with the church’s leaders. These differences included his “doctrine of the soul,” which said that people can access spiritual law, or “Reason,” on their own: “There is no doctrine of the Reason which will bear to be taught by the Understanding.” In “The Divinity School Address,” which expresses this doctrine, Emerson critiques the church on two specific points. The first point is that Christianity has deified Jesus, denying his humanity, and therefore has lost contact with the living presence of God in the world. The second point results from the first: The deification of Jesus has led to a belief that truth comes only from his words, not from one’s own experience and life. To understand why Emerson thought these were problems, and why some people found “The Divinity School Address” radical, it helps to know something about Unitarian theology, and how it was understood in early 19th-century Boston. The name Unitarian comes from the practitioners’ belief in a unified (or unitary) God rather than in the three-in-one God that makes up the Holy Trinity in many other forms of Christianity (for example, in the Catholic Church and the Church of England). One consequence of a Unitarian view of God is that Christ is not seen as divine but as a divinely inspired man. Even within Unitarianism, however, there are differences about how human Jesus was. Some believers claim that although Jesus was not God, he was a more-than-human spirit
398â•…â•… Emerson, Ralph Waldo that appeared on earth in human form for a while Others, including Emerson, saw Jesus as having been a divinely inspired person, no more and no less. This belief was (and still is) a staple of Unitarian thought, but at the time Emerson gave his talk, the more conservative Unitarian leaders were attempting to downplay the tenet that Jesus was human lest their church be accused of not being Christian at all. Emerson’s stance, while technically in keeping with Unitarian theology, was thus somewhat upsetting to certain members of his faith (including, for example, one of his former teachers at the Divinity School). In his address, Emerson characterizes the theology of these more conservative church leaders as telling followers that “you must subordinate your nature to Christ’s nature; you must accept our interpretations; and take his portrait as the vulgar draw it.” In contrast with this dogmatism, he insists that Jesus was a human being, divinely inspired but not himself divine, and that Jesus therefore is simply what all people have the potential to become. He rails against the church’s denial of this point and the fact that, in church teachings, “the divine nature is attributed to one or two persons, and denied to all the rest, and denied with fury. The doctrine of inspiration is lost; the base doctrine of the majority of voices, usurps the place of the doctrine of the soul.” Although the combination of Emerson’s spirituality with his critique of the church could be interpreted to mean that Emerson opposed organized religion generally, in fact the reverse is true. His goal in the “Divinity School Address” is to stir his listeners to revive Christianity, not to replace it. This point is made especially clear in his statement that he does not want the newly ordained preachers to “establish a Cultus with new rites and forms,” but instead to “let the breath of new life be breathed by you through the forms already existing.” In other words, the goal is to bring life back to the church’s existing practices. He repeatedly stresses the importance, both to the spiritual and to the social, of the preacher’s role. Regarding society, he asks: “And what greater calamity can fall upon a nation, than the loss of worship?” Through “The Divinity School Address,” he hopes to reinvigorate
the church, its followers’ spiritual lives, and so the nation as a whole. Sarah Perrault
Spirituality in “The Divinity School Address.”
“The Divinity School Address” is, first and foremost, about spirituality. Although Emerson delivered the talk at Harvard Divinity School, and although he couched the talk in terms of religious reform, the underlying motivation for that reform was a perceived lack of spirituality, and the ultimate goal was to bring individual spirituality back into religion. The core belief in Emerson’s spirituality was that the world was infused with divinity. This also was a central tenet of transcendentalism, a philosophical movement of which he was a leader, which said that people could access the divine through their own efforts, especially by heightening their awareness of the natural world. This belief in the pervasiveness of the divine shows up throughout “The Divinity School Address,” starting with the first paragraph. Emerson begins the talk by describing three kinds of virtue, each more meaningful than the last. The first, rooted in the material world, is the virtue associated with human creativity, for example in industry and agriculture. The second, also rooted in physical reality, is the virtue associated with a scientific appreciation of the laws of nature. The third, which transcends the material world, is the virtue associated with a human connection to spiritual law, also referred to in the address as “Reason.” According to Emerson, spiritual law is a positive force, meaning not only that it is good but that it exerts an influence on the world. Unlike some traditional Christian philosophies, Emerson did not juxtapose battling forces of good and evil. Instead, he compared goodness to heat—something present in varying degrees, but with no opposite. Spiritual laws “execute themselves,” meaning they manifest in people’s lives constantly, reacting instantly to any action. They are everywhere because “the world is not the product of manifold power, but of one will, of one mind,” and therefore everything in the world reflects the presence of that will. Emerson expresses the same idea of how spirituality permeates the world when he says that “all things proceed out of
“The Divinity School Address”â•…â•… 399 this same spirit, which is differently named love, justice, temperance, in its different applications, just as the ocean receives different names on the several shores which it washes.” Emerson reminds his listeners to look for the divine in nature, for example in “the light of rising and of setting suns, with the flying cloud, the singing bird, and the breath of flowers,” and also in other people. He explains that virtue manifests in a person who, when hearing bad preaching, still “draws supplies to virtue out of very indifferent nutriment,” and that although there are good preachers, it is even more important to realize that all people have at least a spark of goodness in them. As he says in paragraph 26, “the exceptions are not so much to be found in a few eminent preachers, as in the better hours, the truer inspirations of all,—nay, in the sincere moments of every man.” The divine, because of its ubiquity, is accessible to anyone. Emerson argues that people learn about the spiritual laws at the same time that they learn about the natural laws, as they experience these laws’ effects in their lives. At the same time, they are not able to perceive spiritual laws as easily as they do natural laws, because people perceive the divine through intuition, not through the senses. The all-encompassing nature of spirituality, combined with its elusiveness, produces a paradox within “The Divinity School Address.” On the one hand, Emerson says that because spiritual laws can only be known through experience and intuition, they cannot be understood and articulated as easily as natural laws. On the other hand, he argues that communicating about spirituality is immensely important because true preaching can help point its listeners toward the divine. Words point toward a truth, but can only point; the truth “cannot be received at second hand.” In other words, the way to inspire others to be in touch with spiritual law is by being in touch with it oneself and speaking and acting from that connection. Emerson urges the Divinity School graduates to make this connection and to bring the church back to life, not through new rituals but through making their own connections to the divine and letting that inspire their preaching. Sarah Perrault
Tradition in “The Divinity School Address.”
At first read, “The Divinity School Address” seems to be wholeheartedly antitradition, at least with regard to religion. Ralph Waldo Emerson claims “that tradition characterizes the preaching of this country; that it comes out of the memory, and not out of the soul” and that, therefore, “historical Christianity destroys the power of preaching, by withdrawing it from the exploration of the moral nature of man, where the sublime is, where are the resources of astonishment and power.” Regarding people who preach in this tradition, he says, “Whenever the pulpit is usurped by a formalist, then is the worshipper defrauded and disconsolate.” Emerson’s rejection of empty forms in religious practice parallels his rejection in another famous speech, “The American Scholar,” of too close an adherence to the European scholarly tradition. In “The Divinity School Address,” he specifically looks at how excessive emphasis on religious tradition impedes spiritual development. This is evident in his second critique of Christianity, which begins with an allusion to “the traditionary and limited way of using the mind of Christ” in which preachers repeat Christ’s words instead of following his example of allowing “greatness—yea, God himself, into the open soul” and letting what is learned through that spiritual openness be “the fountain of the established teaching in society.” Emerson goes so far as to characterize the church of his day as an “eastern monarchy of a Christianity, which indolence and fear have built” and in which descriptions of Christ are no longer “sallies of admiration and love” but instead have been “petrified into official titles.” The result of this ossification was that the church’s practice, instead of fostering spiritual growth, “kills all generous sympathy and liking.” The problem goes beyond a rigid adherence to the words of Christianity, and into a general tendency to seek spirituality by copying others. Emerson describes this tendency as “the capital mistake of the infant man, who seeks to be great by following the great, and hopes to derive advantages from another” (original emphasis). In Emerson’s view, to imitate others is more than a mistake; it is a violence toward oneself, given that each person is equal to all others
400â•…â•… Emerson, Ralph Waldo in being “an inlet into the deeps of Reason.” This is so significant that he compares the unquestioning followers of tradition to slaves. “Wherever a man comes,” he writes, “there comes revolution. The old is for slaves.” He also refers to the “soul-destroying slavery to habit.” In contrast, he says, people must all find their own paths to God. Despite these condemnatory phrases, Emerson actually sees much value in tradition and history, but with the caveat that “all the expressions of this sentiment are sacred and permanent in proportion to their purity.” In other words, language endures and has value to the extent that it comes sincerely from the speaker’s soul. In fact, Emerson speaks of how much the European tradition “has always owed to oriental genius” as expressed by its “holy bards,” the greatest of whom was Jesus. Emerson points out how thoroughly the present is rooted in and nurtured by the past when he explains that “the unique impression of Jesus upon mankind, whose name is not so much written as ploughed into the history of this world, is proof of the subtle virtue of this infusion.” Jesus himself is Emerson’s model for not giving undue attention to models. Jesus “felt respect for Moses and the prophets; but no unfit tenderness at postponing their initial revelations, to the hour and the man that now is; to the eternal revelation in the heart. Thus was he a true man” and, in fact, “the only soul in history who has appreciated the worth of a man.” In other words, Jesus knew the value of the prophets’ words, but he also knew that those words must not stand between the self and the divine. Similarly, Emerson does not oppose the rituals of the church but, rather, objects to how they are being performed. He says of the Sunday service: “If no heart warm this rite, the hollow, dry, creaking formality is too plain” to reach the listeners, and thus what listeners receive is “not the doctrine of the soul, but an exaggeration of the personal, the positive, the ritual.” Emerson is quite explicit about the distinction between Christ’s teachings and the lifeless use to which they have been put. Christ’s teachings, he says, are what give us all “our birth and nurture” and are the what the Divinity School graduates
“are now setting forth to teach.” Indeed, he refers to the church’s teachings as “its blessed words, which have been the consolation of humanity.” But that consolation must be approached as a guide, not as a gift of premade truth: “It is a low benefit to give me something; it is a high benefit to enable me to do somewhat of myself.” Thus, tradition is good to the extent that it provides signposts. Sarah Perrault
EMERSON, RALPH WALDOâ•… “SelfReliance”â•… (1841)
“Self-Reliance” is one of Ralph Waldo Emerson’s most widely read essays because it easily and optimistically connects the solitary individual to the natural world through simple truths. Emerson’s message of hope comes from the transcendental philosophy that by looking up at the stars or at a blade of grass, by smelling pines or listening to insects, one learns the truth of him or herself. Through solitude comes self-knowledge. It is one’s inner truth that creates wisdom and understanding. Emerson says that everyone can be a genius just by making the connection of the natural world to one’s own soul. The most quoted line from the essay, “To be great is to be misunderstood,” has been repeated by generations of readers, though many secretly hope the opposite is also true! Emerson connects the natural world to religious and philosophical beliefs. Through example, he relates man’s soul to the divine soul, to the voice of God and the legends of the Greeks. He continually connects the truth of human beings to the indisputable truth of simple natural occurrences. By offering such an accessible method for truth, Emerson offers a positive message as well: Look around, and if you truly see, you will understand. The rewards of “Self-Reliance” are not overtly stated but gradually offered throughout the essay. No matter the age or time, the basics of the natural world remain true and easy to gain. Emerson offers simple rewards such as truth, freedom, respect, and understanding—rewards that any earnest reader can easily attain. Patricia Brugman
“Self-Reliance”â•…â•… 401
Individual and Society in “Self-Reliance”
Ralph Waldo Emerson begins his essay “SelfReliance” with the Latin quotation: “Ne te quaesiveris extra”—“Do not seek for things outside yourself.” With this, he makes his point quickly: The individual is the supreme strength of group thinking, not the other way around. While every person is a product of society, the man or woman who listens to his or her own soul can be called a thinker, a voice of ideas, or a genius. Emerson calls on the individual to be a believer in him or herself, to trust his or her deepest thoughts, as did the great thinkers of the past—“Moses, Plato and Milton.” Emerson unites all individuals into the fabric of society by saying, “In every work of genius we recognize our own rejected thoughts,” as if to say that brilliant thoughts are inherent in every solitary thinker—they only need a voice to become part of the body of human understanding. He implies here that while ideas of genius come from the individual, they migrate to all people and fuel society: “A stranger will say with masterly good sense precisely what we have thought and felt all the time.” A single thought can be so true and honest that it will seem to another person like something from the depth of his or her own soul. Emerson’s concept of the relationship between society and the individual is best summed up in his dictum “Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string.” By tapping into his or her inner strength, the individual becomes powerful. The vibration of this metaphorical string is truth, a truth that we can all hear, all respond to, and even seek for motivation. To Emerson, a person’s inner voice is God-given, and one only need look to the simplest of humankind, a baby, to see the truth: “Infancy conforms to no one: all conform to it, so that one baby commonly makes four or five out of the adults who prattle and play to it.” Adults relate to babies as if remembering when they themselves were once pure and honest. There is no conscious joining of society and youth. Society joins the youth on the floor in baby-speak because the youth cries out for attention. True, the infant is dependent on others for care, but not for truth. For truth, the infant taps into his or her inner beings and prattles as a way of communicating with adults. Granted, it is not the ideas that
might exist in the infant mind that Emerson seeks, it is the model of honest communication. An infant can do nothing more than communicate honestly. The focus, though, is on the mature individual as a person who has created individual work. Emerson says, “[D]o your work, and I shall know you. Do your work, and you shall re-enforce yourself.” If a person can find the freedom to be a truly honest individual, he or she will be a truly honest thinker, one who increases the knowledge of society. The infant represents the individual, while prattling adults represent society. Under this model, who now controls the common stream of thought? Emerson states that the strong individual is the result of strong, personal truths, and that strong individuals are necessary for a strong society. The danger, he warns, is in conformity because through conformity, the individual is lost: “For non-conformity, the world whips you with its displeasure.” Then, one paragraph later: “The other terror that scares us from self-trust is our consistency.” These two quotations reveal the irony of the individual and society. While a strong individual is necessary for a strong society, a strong society crushes the individual who stands out as different. Rather than rejoice at the genius of a new, individual idea, the group is often blinded to that which does not already exist in the common body of ideas. Emerson lists examples of great ideas that were the result of “pure and wise spirit” but which were summarily crushed by the thick thinking of a slow-moving society. Of Socrates, Jesus, Luther, Copernicus, Galileo and Newton, he writes his most quoted line: “To be great is to be misunderstood.” To be great is to think beyond all previous boundaries of thought and so to add terror to the minds of contemporary thinkers. Emerson goes on to give hope to the otherwise voiceless individual through a modern fable. In this story, a drunkard is taken from the street to the palace where he is washed and dressed and given the duke’s identity, only to wake up to begin an important life. The drunkard is, perhaps, a metaphor for the nonconformist and the palace and title metaphors for respect and honor. All a great thinker needs is a way to get from the street to the palace, to move from the ordinary to the honored. Only by
402â•…â•… Emerson, Ralph Waldo truth and honesty can ordinary thoughts become the ideals of society. Later in the essay, Emerson creates another metaphor, this time joining the individual and society in a way that makes them forever intertwined. Using a transcendental image, he says: “All men have my blood, and I have all men’s.” Each individual, whether a genius or a sot, combines into the greater whole of society, which is then mixed, as if chemically, and separated out into individuals who think honestly. Emerson asserts that every society is dependent on geniuses like Galileo and his “opera-glass” or Columbus and his “undecked boat.” The inventions of humankind serve to increase the discoveries that men make and therefore their ideas. It is the strong individual who must navigate the push and pull of resistance and acceptance in order to make society great. Emerson ends his essay with his most powerful plea to the reader. After making a case for the importance of pure, honest and individual thought, he says, “Nothing can bring you peace but yourself. Nothing can bring you peace but the triumph of principles.” With “peace” he infuses a degree of selfrespect and self-satisfaction that can only come from self-reliance. In the end, the title of the essay says it all. Each person is responsible for his or her own thoughts and thinking. Only through the notion of being a self-reliant individual can all people join together in a self-reliant society. Patricia Brugman
Nature in “Self-Reliance”
Ralph Waldo Emerson’s reflections in his essay “Self-Reliance” extend beyond men and women’s obvious relationship with the natural world. Emerson considers what is natural in the world as well as what is inspirational within the human soul. While he does not define nature in this essay, he does indicate that he means all interpretations of nature, even those associated with God. From his transcendental perspective, there are no limiting parameters. The human connection to nature is open to the sensibility of every reader and every generation of readers. To all, he offers an ever-optimistic reflection on the human experience.
Emerson begins his essay with quotations from classic and contemporary literature that show the ways in which man has always looked to the natural world for a source of truth about life: “Man is his own star; and the soul that can / Render an honest and a perfect man / Commands all light, all influence, all fate.” Here, the connection between the star-filled heavens and the honest man becomes the thesis for what Emerson means in his essay. The perfect star is a model for what the honest man can be. To this end, he does not see man as separate from nature, but part of it. He says, “The power which resides in [men and women] is new in nature and none but he knows what that is which he can do nor does he know until he has tried.” The human experience is connected to the natural experience and is full of hope. The notion that one never knows one’s ability until one has tried is a message that both flows from nature and leads to a source of endless potential. Referring back to the notion of a “perfect star,” the sky is the limit. The title of the essay, “Self-Reliance,” directs the reader to the purpose of the human connection to nature. To be self-reliant is to be strong from within, to have found the secret to one’s own soul. To this end, Emerson says that men and women must be individuals that retreat into the solitude of nature: “[T]he great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude.” The result of solitude is a connection beyond understanding: “To be great is to be misunderstood.” The person who truly learns the lessons of nature often thinks a truth that is incomprehensible to the common person. Nature, in the sense of man’s nature, cannot be changed. If men and women are true learners and true to what they learn, they become honest and true to the world. Emerson says, “I suppose no man can violate his nature.╯.╯.╯. My book should smell of pines and resound with the hum of insects.” Here, he connects the sensual reality of smell and sound to the truth on the very page he is writing. He not only propounds a great theory, he proves it in the very writing he produces. The pursuit of this honest and natural work requires an acceptance of the world’s mysteries. By comparing the human experience to the natural
“Self-Reliance”â•…â•… 403 world, Emerson sets up a correlation that elevates the importance of the mysteries of nature that refers back to the earlier quotation of the perfect star: “We first share the life by which things exist, and afterwards see them as appearances in nature, and forget that we have shared their cause.╯.╯.╯. [H]ere are the lungs of that inspiration which giveth man wisdom.” Emerson plainly states here that through nature and natural appearances, men and women are given the perfect model for their own thinking and understanding. Through nature comes the lesson for human genius. By observing the natural world and how it works, men and women breathe life into their own lives. Rather than relying on individual thought, men and women often quote “some saint or sage.” Emerson would rather have the thinker rely on his or her own inner truth and inner voice, which is an individual voice of truth. He instructs the reader with an empowering message: “I will so trust that what is deep is holy, that I will do strongly before the sun and moon whatever inly rejoices me, and the heart appoints. If you are noble, I will love you.” He thus gives his ultimate in inspiration and encouragement. He gives readers of all generations hope for themselves and a goal that is attainable to everyone. Emerson has not given the reader a guide for some worthless purpose but has provided uplifting examples of plain learning that anyone can achieve. This is the optimistic legacy that reaches all earnest readers of this essay. By simply gazing to the heavens or beholding the scent and sounds of nature, men and women can attain the truth that resides within their own hearts. Through simple practices, Emerson offers hope for a more meaningful human experience, one of hope and truth. Patricia Brugman
Work in Emerson’s “Self-Reliance”
Ralph Waldo Emerson’s focus in his essay “SelfReliance” is on the importance of work as essential to a full human experience. Work is more than a means to an end, in Emerson’s mind. His message is very simple: Through human effort, all people are rewarded. While this seems to lead to a business relationship between work and payment, the payment that Emerson offers is not monetary but,
rather, spiritual. In this essay and every interpretation of “Self-Reliance,” the self-reliant individual is the one who gains as much as he or she seeks. Emerson does not offer a definition of work but leaves the meaning open to the reader’s interpretation. In a general way, Emerson’s idea of “work” is the conveyance of truth from the natural world to the human conscience for the purpose of improving society. If there were no work, society and the individual would remain disconnected and misunderstood. By contrast, human understanding of the natural world (through work) communicates the truth of nature to society, for the betterment of all people. In basic terms, men and women must work in order to reap; an individual must work in order to live. These are obvious truths made self-evident by both economics and history. Emerson goes further by identifying work as necessary—as a way for people to know their world and therefore themselves. The truth of the world is not a given; it must be sought after. He says that “though the wide universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to him but through his toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given to him to till.” This harvesting metaphor makes it plain that work creates results that are not only productive but necessary for the human soul. By seeking knowledge, men and women will gain truth. Emerson follows this sentiment with the obvious: Though work is hard, it is also rewarding in more than monetary terms: “God will not have his works made manifest by cowards. A man is relieved and gay when he has put his heart into his work and done his best.” As God works, so shall men and women. Not working does not deliver men and women to their state of full awareness or genius, but leaves them bereft of genius, invention, and hope. In his own life, Emerson lives the message he teaches. He says that work must be the response to the call of life to the point of denying all else to get the job done: “I shun father and mother and wife and brother, when my genius calls me. I would write on the lintels of the doorpost.” His passion is to do his work, which in turn calls others to work for their passions. Through the collective effort of people
404â•…â•… Equiano, Olaudah at work, the collective mind of society grows to an understanding that helps us all. Nowhere in “Self-Reliance” does Emerson offer an easy life as a viable pursuit. A fulfilled life is a struggle, he says. Work benefits both the individual and society as a whole since it comes from nature, but it is also difficult. He writes: “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adorned by little statesmen and philosophers and diviners. With consistency, a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall.” Emerson is not in favor of shadows or an incomplete life. The full experience of life can only be achieved by true work, inspired by nature as a means of improving the minds of all mankind. The payment, in the truest sense, is spiritual, and that elevated sense of individual spirit is what makes us all truly self-reliant. Patricia Brugman
EQUIANO, OLAUDAHâ•… The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African. Written by Himselfâ•… (1789)
Olaudah Equiano’s Interesting Narrative of his life, one of the first widely read slave narratives, was first published in 1789. Equiano (ca. 1745–97) was well-known to his audience of American and European abolitionists at the time his narrative was first published. By 1794, the Interesting Narrative was so popular that it had gone through nine editions. Unique because it is the only slave narrative that gives a detailed first-person account of a slave’s life in Africa before being taken to America, the Interesting Narrative became a prototype for works used by abolitionists in the fight against slavery. Equiano successfully used his Narrative to influence British politicians debating the slave trade in Parliament. His involvement in the British debate helped persuade lawmakers to abolish the slave trade through the Slave Trade Act of 1807. Equiano’s narrative gives an account of his enslavement, escape, and eventual freedom. By his own account, he was born in 1745 in the village of Essaka (now in modern-day Nigeria, West Africa).
Kidnapped at age 11 along with his sister, Equiano was sold into slavery during the mid-1750s. He was enslaved in Africa for a short time but was then sold to British traders who shipped him to the West Indies. Shortly thereafter, he was transported to a plantation in Virginia, only to be resold to a British naval officer, Michael Pascal. Pascal brought Equiano to London and renamed him Gustavus Vassa. Equiano served in the Royal Navy during the Seven Years’ War. Dishonoring his promise to free Equiano at the end of the war, Pascal resold him into West Indian slavery. In 1766, Equiano purchased his freedom and became independent. From being a slave, he became the wealthiest African-descended man in Britain. In 1792, he married an English woman by the name of Susannah Cullen, with whom he had two daughters named Anna Maria and Joanna. On her 21st birthday in the year 1816, Joanna inherited Equiano’s estate, the equivalent of $120,000 today. Olaudah Equiano’s publications catapulted him into a life of wealth and prestige. He acquired more fame and fortune than any of his African contemporaries during the 18th century. Kelli Randall
Freedom in The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African. Written by Himself
Olaudah Equiano opens his Interesting Narrative by describing the freedom he enjoyed as a young boy in Africa. Equiano was born free. His opening narration illustrates that freedom was a natural and innate state of being for him as a boy, but unfortunately, he was captured and enslaved in Africa at age 11. Thus, his status throughout the Narrative goes from free to enslaved to free. There are two primary variations of freedom throughout the Narrative: physical and spiritual. The two are inextricably connected, and as a result, these two forms of freedom cannot be separated. In the Interesting Narrative, Equiano serves in the navy during the Seven Years’ War under his master, the British navy officer Michael Pascal. Though Pascal has promised to free Equiano at the conclusion of the war in 1762, he goes back on his word. He does not free Equiano, but instead sells him back
The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the Africanâ•‹.â•‹.â•‹.â•…â•… 405 into the horrifying system of West Indian slavery. Working in the sugar islands of the West Indies, Equiano manages to save his money and purchase his freedom in 1766. Equiano’s freedom to write is yet another form of freedom central to the Interesting Narrative. The freedom that comes from writing his autobiography is important when examining Equiano, demonstrating the close connection between his freedom and his identity. When he was a slave, a specific identity was forced upon him: Pascal renamed him Gustavus Vassa to demonstrate his control over his property. When Equiano becomes free, part of his task is to carve out a new identity and place for himself in society. He does this, in part, by writing his own story and portraying himself as he wants to be seen. Earlier in the Narrative, as a slave, Equiano possesses an unusual freedom of movement. One of his many owners, Robert King, is aware that if Equiano is given too much freedom, he could escape. However, he earns King’s trust, takes advantage of the freedom being at sea gave him, and becomes a shrewd businessman, earning and saving enough money to eventually buy his own freedom. In addition, he feels that honesty is the best policy, and he strives to treat others the way he wants to be treated—with respect. He does not feel that it would be right to escape from slavery by running away, preferring to be freed legally. He ultimately chooses to purchase his own freedom, and he returns to England to pursue the abolitionist cause. Equiano’s enslavement is atypical and not representative of the suffering most slaves experience. He is literate and has several good masters who allow him to learn various trades, skills, and information he otherwise would not have been privy to. Unlike Michael Pascal, Robert King keeps his promise of freedom: He authorizes Equiano’s free papers to be drawn up, and he signs them, endorsing Equiano’s freedom. Equiano keeps these legally binding freedom papers on his person at all times, for he knows many would challenge and question the legitimacy of his freedom. Notably, he includes his freedom papers in his autobiography as proof for any doubting readers.
Once free, Equiano’s relationship with Robert King goes from slave-master to employeeemployer status. There is difficulty in this for both parties, for when Equiano becomes free, King can no longer protect his former slave as his property. Equiano, a freed black man, is now in danger of abuse and reenslavement by those seeking to undermine his freedom. There is no one to physically protect or defend him. The institution of slavery has thus placed limitations on the extent to which he is actually free. If he travels to places where slavery still exists, his freedom is very much threatened. He has to act and defend his rights as a free man as he faces many dangerous and precarious situations. Equiano becomes truly free once he leaves North America and the West Indies and heads for England. American and Caribbean slavery had placed great restrictions on Equiano’s freedom. At sea, he had earned respect because of his skills and expertise in seafaring; at sea, he was able to overcome racial barriers, and even whites, who judged him on the basis of his skin color, had to recognize his seafaring expertise. What his narrative demonstrates is that though physically and spiritually enslaved, his mental toughness and persistence is what ultimately granted him his freedom. Equiano’s Interesting Narrative demonstrates how thoughtful, perceptive, and intelligent an individual he was. He used his mind to work through situations; even though his slave masters owned his body, they did not own his mind and his soul. The innate freedom Equiano ultimately possessed over his mind and soul allowed him to transcend the fact that he was in bondage. Notably, Equiano’s physical freedom came after his spiritual conversion to Christianity. Kelli Randall
Identity in The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African. Written by Himself
The question of Olaudah Equiano’s sense of identity is complicated, and critics have hotly debated the culture to which Equiano and his Interesting Narrative belong. The noted biographer, critic, and scholar Vincent Carretta describes Equiano as “an indisputably African body in European dress.”
406â•…â•… Equiano, Olaudah Equiano includes an elegant frontispiece of himself as a preface to his Interesting Narrative. Though the portrait presents Equiano as a European gentleman, the title page of the book reads, “Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African.” Equiano refers to himself as “the African” because he knows that skin color is the standard by which he will be identified by others. The portrait’s portrayal of Equiano as both African and European underscores his dual identity as Olaudah Equiano and Gustavus Vassa. Gustavus Vassa, the name given to him by his master, is the name that Equiano ultimately identifies with for most of his life. Yet toward the end of his life, he reclaims his African identity and goes by the name Equiano. Equiano repeatedly conveys his loyalty to Britain, and he praises the good of the British imperial system throughout his Interesting Narrative. He considers himself British and does all he can to deny any difference between himself and others of British culture. His adoption of British culture is so convincing that at one pivotal point in the narrative, a white slave owner tells Equiano that he “talks too much English.” Despite the accusation, Equiano does not turn his back on his African heritage. Instead, he possesses an acute awareness of “race” as the equivalent of what we would refer to as “culture.” Equiano considers himself to be British even though he is of African descent. He chooses to take on the customs, politics, and religious practices of the British. Throughout the narrative, he is careful not to seem too radical, and he proposes the adoption of British customs in African society. Nonetheless, Equiano is keenly aware of his dual identity and the boundaries between his African identity and British acculturation. He realizes that he will be judged on the basis of his skin color and not on the basis of the culture he subscribes to. In a pivotal moment in the Interesting Narrative, he describes an encounter with a young black boy, who runs to him and embraces him as if “he had been his brother” though “they had never seen each other before.” Though Equiano chooses to live his life as a British man, he becomes frustrated by the fact that he continues to be identified by others as an African. He speaks as both an insider and an outsider of Brit-
ish culture, demonstrating his double consciousness and discomfort with his marginal identity. Though Equiano spends a great portion of the first part of his Interesting Narrative talking about his African roots, at key moments in the narrative he considers himself white. He even expresses embarrassment about his skin color. As a result, his complicated perception of himself both helps and hinders his abolitionist politics. While he does not initially condemn slavery altogether, he is critical of the physical cruelty it engenders. His experiences of slavery in America and the West Indies are far worse than the periods when he is enslaved in Africa or Britain. Equiano has a different attitude toward slavery than most abolitionists of the time, in fact, because he opposed the cruelty more than slavery itself, he might be better called an ameliorationist. Equiano’s viewpoint of slavery from an economic perspective conflicts with other popular antislavery messages. Surprisingly, after becoming free, Equiano works as an overseer in Central America. Deeply affected by the immoral behavior associated with the institution of slavery, however, he eventually quits and returns to England to promote the antislavery cause passionately. He becomes actively involved in a “Back to Africa” movement, the Sierra Leone project, in order to relocate Britain’s population of poor black people. A distinctly African-descended voice sharing experiences of life in Africa and speaking out against the slave trade proves to be most credible in persuading an abolitionist audience in the case of Olaudah Equiano’s Interesting Narrative. Yet the credibility of Equiano’s account of his origins in Africa is in question. The scholar Vincent Carretta’s research for Equiano, the African: Biography of a Self-Made Man (2005) indicates that it is highly probable that Equiano fabricated his African identity and dramatic account of surviving the Middle Passage. Carretta’s research found baptismal and naval records suggesting South Carolina to be Equiano’s probable birthplace. If this is true, then Equiano manufactured the story of his African identity from books he must have read about Africa, and his account of the Middle Passage probably comes from oral accounts of slaves. If Equiano invented his African identity, it nevertheless became an important factor in the suc-
The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the Africanâ•‹.â•‹.â•‹.â•…â•… 407 cess of his autobiography. He portrayed himself in a favorable light for the reading public and influenced that audience to denounce the inhumane practice of slavery. Kelli Randall
Spirituality in The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African. Written by Himself
In the opening chapter of his Interesting Narrative, Olaudah Equiano boldly announces, “I regard myself as a particular favourite of Heaven, and acknowledge the mercies of Providence in every occurrence of my life.” Equiano feels that God’s providence, or plan for his life, justifies everything that has happened to him, both good and the bad. This heartfelt Christian conviction is quite different from Equiano’s account of “Eboe” religious cultural practices in Africa. The Eboes believe in one Creator. Equiano never uses the word God or Lord when he describes the Eboe supreme being. The Creator lives in the sun and wears a belt so “he may never eat or drink.” The Creator also smokes a pipe, a luxury in Eboe culture. The Eboes believe that the Creator controls people’s lives, especially their deaths and forms of captivity such as slavery. Their religion, however, does not include a doctrine of eternity. Instead, Equiano refers to their specific belief practice as the “transmigration of souls.” These souls of friends and family members guard and protect their living loved ones from bad or evil spirits, foes, and enemies. Equiano describes how ritualistic reverence for those souls is demonstrated by setting aside a portion of food or pouring drink onto the floor to both acknowledge and appease the spirits. Equiano’s Interesting Narrative demonstrates the influence that autobiography as a genre and style had on slave narratives. The genre of spiritual autobiography is particularly important in understanding the structure and style of the Interesting Narrative. The slave narrative plot generally focuses on the protagonist’s enslavement, escape, and eventual freedom. The structure of Equiano’s story parallels nicely the spiritual autobiography’s three-part emphasis on the protagonist’s life of sin, conversion, and spiritual rebirth. Slavery is akin to a
life of sin, while escape from slavery parallels spiritual conversion, and freedom is symbolic of spiritual rebirth. In the spiritual autobiography, the narrator is retrospective. Equiano speaks about the past to give an account of things as they were experienced in the past while at the same time interpreting past events from a present, informed, and wise perspective. As a spiritual autobiographer, Equiano initially talks about sin, then his repentance of sin, inevitable backsliding, and rebirth by professing his faith. He parallels physical enslavement to sin. It is not until he accepts Christ that he becomes both physically and spiritually free. Equiano is only able to come to terms with his identity and develop his religious character after he obtains his physical freedom by purchasing it. In terms of Christian theology, Equiano redeems himself. With a number of his contemporaries, such as Phillis Wheatley, James Albert Ukawsaw Gronniosaw, and John Marrant, he shared Selina Hastings, countess of Huntingdon, and the Reverend George Whitefield as patrons and spiritual advisers. Like his fellow African-descended writers, he embraces Methodism. Equiano’s audience probably consisted primarily of Christians. In his narrative, he seeks to appeal to the Christian consciences of his readers to persuade them toward the cause of abolishing slavery. He hopes that Christians will empathize with his experiences as a slave. If they are indeed true Christians, then they will not want to take part in the human suffering of their fellow enslaved African brethren. Equiano’s abolitionist rhetoric focuses primarily on Christian morals, and he often indicts his audience of white Christians for their hypocrisy. He challenged them to do unto others as they would have others do unto them. He specifically refers to these individuals as “nominal Christians” and demonstrates the incompatibility of slavery and Christianity. Like many of his African-descended contemporaries, Equiano feels that his fall into slavery was meant to be. God’s plan for Equiano was to experience physical slavery as a path toward becoming spiritually free. Kelli Randall
408â•…â•… Erdrich, Louise
ERDRICH, LOUISEâ•… The Bingo Palaceâ•… (1994)
Published in 1994, The Bingo Palace was Louise Erdrich’s fourth novel set on the Turtle Mountain Chippewa Reservation in North Dakota. Like the other installments of what is known as the Little No Horse Saga, The Bingo Palace portrays the tensions between reservation life in the 1980s and Native American tradition through the intersecting lives of the Kashpaw, Nanapush, and Lamartine families. The novel moves chronologically but weaves in the past of each character through story and reminiscence. The main character of The Bingo Palace is Lipsha Morrissey, who returns to the reservation from Fargo, North Dakota. When he goes back to the place of his upbringing, Lipsha struggles to reconcile his past with his present and future. On his personal journey, he feuds with his entrepreneurial uncle, Lyman Lamartine; falls in love with Lyman’s girlfriend, Shawnee Ray Toose; feels manipulated by his aunt, Zelda Kashpaw; sees the ghost of his mother, June Morrissey; and becomes enlightened by the elusive Fleur Pillager. Through these encounters, Lipsha seeks spiritual awakening, but at the same time he is blinded by money, possessions, and sex. His quest includes themes such as fate, commodification/commercialization, identity, family, love, and tradition. The Bingo Palace is a novel that is both universal and specific. Erdrich (b. 1954) centers on the universal discovery of oneself, a complex intersection of family, memory, culture, and personality, but she also focuses on the specific experiences of Native Americans struggling to maintain tradition in the modern world. Erica D. Galioto
Commodification/Commercialization in The Bingo Palace
On the Turtle Mountain Chippewa Reservation, the residents featured in Louise Erdrich’s The Bingo Palace experience the conflict of living in two worlds: the world of Native American tradition and the world of modern American culture. They want to preserve history, but the families also need to survive financially, and real want quickly
supplants fiscal desires. The circus-like appearance of the Bingo hall represents the difficult balance between the traditional and modern worlds. While the structure is erected on tribal land, it stands for commercialism, greed, and excess. Run by Lyman Lamartine, the reservation’s most noted businessman, the Bingo Palace emphasizes winning money to pay for worldly goods as opposed to deepening spirituality. Lyman’s determination to build an even more elaborate casino on ancestral land shows that desecrating his history means little in relation to financial gain. By emphasizing commercialization as a theme, Erdrich illustrates how the desire for money not only drives the characters away from tradition but also leaves them unsatisfied and empty, financially and spiritually. Though Lyman and Lipsha share many differences, they are similarly focused on material gain. Lyman, as the Bingo Palace owner, and Lipsha, as a maintenance worker/bartender, are equally influenced by money. For Lyman, enough is never enough, and he willingly trades tradition for access to funds. His salary and bingo games leave him unsatisfied, and so he gambles everything away in Reno after the Indian Gaming Conference. His exchange of his father Nector’s sacred pipe for $100 at a pawn shop permits him to lose a few more rounds of blackjack, but the ease with which he sells his history is difficult for readers to accept. Blind to his own shallowness, Lyman plans to erect a casino on ancestral Pillager land, but it will undoubtedly fail to satisfy his greed. Similar to Lyman, Lipsha is also driven by material gain. His fixation with the bingo van as his ultimate prize signifies his emphasis on worldly goods. While he does, in fact, win the van with the assistance of his dead mother’s intervention, his satisfaction is short-lived. An idiotic fight with some white teenagers results in the van’s destruction and represents the eventual deterioration of all commercial goods. Lipsha, however, continues to play his lucky cards and racks up winnings. When he fails to spend every cent on booze, food, and nonessentials, he uses his mattress as a bank. He eventually trusts his uncle to open a joint account for them but is fleeced by Lyman and again finds himself penniless. Through Lyman and Lipsha, the negative effects
The Bingo Palaceâ•…â•… 409 of commercialism are emphasized. Money turns them against tradition and family, greed leaves them powerless to their own will, and material objects separate them from inner spirituality. They are each left wanting more when the money is gone. Not permanent but transitory, money is only a temporary “insulation” from true connection to the self, others, and land. Though Lyman instructs Lipsha to “go after something real,” neither escapes money’s powerful sway. The emphasis on money and exchange also has a disturbing effect on their relationships with others, specifically with Shawnee Ray Toose, their joint love interest. Rather than treating her as a complex individual with feelings, both Lyman and Lipsha commodify her as a possession to be had. Shawnee is a desired object of belonging, like the bingo van or dollar bills. Erdrich potently describes their commodification of Shawnee through their proposed deal and its execution: Lipsha suggests that he will give his uncle Nector’s tribal pipe if Lyman turns away from Shawnee. Sadly, Shawnee’s objectification continues throughout the novel. Lipsha elevates her to a cherished prize, and Lyman grooms her to be his future casino manager. Others see Shawnee merely as a vessel, as to be filled with their own vision of her. Ironically, she appreciates money for what it is worth as a means to an end: She seeks money to start her own design business or relocate with her son, Redford, off the reservation. Her fiscal acuity surpasses those around her. Like Shawnee, the mysterious Fleur Pillager also understands the truth of money. Her repeated refrain in Lipsha’s mind that Matchimanito Lake, the proposed site of the new casino, is “not real estate” reminds his conscience that some things should be sacred from commercialization. While he and Lyman are constantly reminded of money’s impermanence, Fleur, with her intense spirituality, illustrates that land lasts. Money separates modern people from the things that traditional land connects them to: family, history, and spirituality. Any balance between the traditional and the modern is necessarily difficult when money is involved. Erica D. Galioto
Fate in The Bingo Palace
The Bingo Palace explores the presence of fate, design, and luck in everyday life. While fate—attributing events to outside forces—and design—manipulating events through personal will—can easily be used to explain much of the novel’s action, it is luck, happening by chance, that is most emphasized. Appearing in the titles of nine chapters, “luck” is consistently believed to determine certain events. Similar to fate, luck finds its source outside people; however, it is attributed to everyday occurrences, while fate is decidedly more otherworldly. In both cases, fate and luck allow their believers to deny personal responsibility for their actions, and it is this philosophy that pervades The Bingo Palace. The Bingo Palace itself symbolizes belief in luck on the Turtle Mountain Chippewa Reservation. The local gambling spot, which looks more like a circus tent, depends on people who place their fate in these outside sources. Whether the reservation residents play the daily bingo games, pull the levers of the slot machines, or drink to inebriation, they willingly give over their lives to something outside themselves— an announcer, a machine, or a bottle. Whether they call it everyday luck or spiritual fate, it is the same: a constructed explanation of life’s events. “Lipsha’s Luck” stands as the centerpiece chapter that echoes throughout the other characters’ chapters. Lipsha returns to the reservation a thoroughly modern young man in dress, speech, and attitude and is stunned when Marie Kashpaw, his foster grandmother, presents him with Nector’s pipe housed in a decorative bag. During this exchange, both Lipsha and Marie recede to the past and see Nector with his cherished object, hear his long prayers, and recall his requested favors. Speechless, Lipsha holds the sacred pipe and reconnects with both his recent and ancestral past. That night, buoyed with courage, he attempts to take Shawnee Ray Toose, mother of his uncle’s son, for Chinese food in Canada, but they never make it across the border. They are stopped by an eager agent who searches their vehicle and mistakes Nector’s tribal pipe and natural seed for marijuana and its smoking implement. The agent opens the ornate bag and performs an action only meant for sacred ritual: he joins the bowl of the pipe to the narrow, carved stem. As the only “non-
410â•…â•… Erdrich, Louise Indian” to ever lock these pieces in place, the agent turns Lipsha’s luck to bad. Henceforth in the novel, all of Lipsha’s trials are attributed to this action. Everything from his destroyed bingo van and his failed love affair to his skunk spray and food fight is blamed on turned luck. While it is convenient for Lipsha to blame all of his negative experiences on a source outside himself, he also attributes positive events to good luck. For instance, his very survival is considered lucky because his mother, June, abandoned him when he was an infant. His rescue and subsequent upbringing by Marie Kashpaw hinged on good luck, positive happenstance that he never converted into personal will. Characterized by potential and high ACT scores, Lipsha underperforms and fails to direct his own course. Instead, he searches for signs of chance that foretell his next move. His grandmother’s mailing of his father’s wanted poster is a sign to come home, while a visitation from his mother’s ghost predicts future material gain. After he sees June’s apparition, Lipsha wins the bingo van and countless cash winnings as he plays the cards she leaves with him. He feels more connected to the inner powers of his spirituality and becomes a reservation healer. Like Nector’s pipe, June’s visit makes things happen; only these events are positive due to their source. June, Lyman, Shawnee, Fleur, Redford, Albertine, Gerry, and Zelda, similarly, have chapters devoted to their experiences of luck. Through these characters, Erdrich complicates Lipsha’s simplistic view of fate by presenting situations where luck comes to those who do or do not deserve it or by showing how luck may be consciously crafted. Finally, luck appears to be a matter of perspective. The plane crash that grants Gerry his most recent freedom is good luck, while June’s rape is bad luck. Lyman gambles away significant winnings and Nector’s pipe because he is manipulated by a belief in luck, but Fleur wins her ancestral land back through luck that she manipulates. Shawnee and Zelda exemplify pure personal determination masquerading as luck. Through these myriad examples, Erdrich complicates the distinctions among fate, luck, and design and forces readers to consider the result of denying personal responsibility for one’s choices. Erica D. Galioto
Identity in The Bingo Palace
The characters that populate The Bingo Palace all struggle with the universal complexity of personal identity, and Louise Erdrich shows how it is impossible to fully account for how a person comes to be. Nonetheless, she uses the Little No Horse Saga in part to illustrate the powerful hold memory has on personal identity. The pasts of Lipsha, Zelda, and Lyman determine who they have become, but by reconciling their memories, they can change. Lipsha lives to early adulthood believing the story that his guardians Marie and Nector Kashpaw tell him: His mother, June Morrissey, was wellintended but wild, and she understandably turned him over to the Kashpaw family. Having lived with this explanation through childhood, Lipsha makes his peace with it and forgives his mother for the decision that separated them. As part of his personal history, this fiction dominates his identity; however, his lack of direction and feeling of being lost point to a deeper uncertainty within his being. His persistent emptiness suggests his own ignorance about his past. Upon his return to the reservation, his aunt Zelda, in a drunken state, tells him the truth. Lipsha always feels that Zelda knows him on a deeper level than others, and as the keeper of his unknown secret, now he learns why. Her admission removes Lipsha’s comfort with his own waywardness and pushes him to complete a quest for a more spiritual identity. Zelda reveals to Lipsha that he was not presented to the Kashpaws by a reluctant June but, rather, saved from intentional drowning by Zelda herself. She describes with great detail how June had secured a bundle before throwing it into the slough and leaving. Zelda then recalls wading into where the gunnysack was thrown and using physical exertion to drag it out of the water and to the land. Weighed down by rocks, the bundle concealed baby Lipsha. Throughout this painful revelation and immediately following, Lipsha tries to hold onto his identity even as he feels it shattering. Disbelief pervades him as he repeats “No mother” over and over. Lipsha denies that it was him, denies that it was June, and fearfully grips the fiction he has believed for so long. As it slips away, he fades into a visit from June’s ghost and begins a spiritual journey. He searches for answers and embarks on
Love Medicineâ•…â•… 411 a vision quest that returns him to that experience of pain. Unbeknownst to him, Lipsha carried this pain inside him throughout his childhood to now. By reliving it, he better understands himself and his mother’s actions. As a result, his feeling of emptiness lessens. Lipsha is not free from internal or external conflict, but he can more easily define his own identity once he deals with this difficult history. While Lipsha must confront a past he did not even know he had, Zelda Kashpaw’s personal identity is a conscious reaction to her past. As a young child, Zelda watches her father burn down the house of Lulu Lamartine, the woman with whom he had an adulterous affair. As the flames grow and she contemplates her father’s powerlessness, young Zelda decides never to be controlled by love as an emotion. Years later, she does, in fact, fall in love with Xavier Toose, but she uses personal and spiritual power to resist him. Hardening herself again him and his entreaties, Zelda controls her natural feeling. Though she marries and has children, she never relinquishes her iciness; her harsh personality keeps her distant from others, but her desire to rescue Shawnee Ray, Xavier’s niece, shows that she still harbors feelings for her first love. After 30 years, she finally goes to him. Ready to give up her past and the dependence of her personal identity on hardness, Zelda, like Lipsha, starts a new life. Even Lyman confronts a difficult past experience to forge a new identity. During his vision quest, Lyman recalls his most painful moment, when he watched his brother Henry walk into the water and drown himself after returning from Vietnam. Holding onto this memory has left Lyman with regret and loneliness, and it certainly has contributed to his gambling, a mindnumbing pastime. As he dances in Henry’s clothes to connect with his brother, Lyman hears Henry tell him to put away his ratty garments. Dancing for himself for the first time since Henry’s suicide, Lyman feels Henry to be in a place where it is “calm.” Some of this peace will strengthen Lyman as he reconfigures his relationship to that painful memory and develops his own personal identity. Erica D. Galioto
LOUISE ERDRICHâ•… Love Medicineâ•… (1984, 1993)
Love Medicine, one of the most widely read and often studied works of American Indian literature, was first published in 1984; it was republished with an added chapter in 1993. A collection of interrelated short stories, it is the first installment in the series that would eventually come to be informally known as the Little No Horse Saga. In its pages we are introduced to the families we will meet again and again in the course of the six works that are set in and around the Turtle Mountain Chippewa Reservation in North Dakota. The main characters of Love Medicine are from the generation of Indians who were born in the early part of the 20th century. They are too young to know what life was like for the Chippewa before the American government allotted their land, but they are old enough to have learned many of the traditional ways from their elders. They are perpetually caught between the traditional and the modern: less seduced by the modern than their children, but more adapted to it than their parents. The three most prominent characters are Marie Lazarre Kashpaw; her husband, Nector Kashpaw; and her rival and his lover, Lulu Nanapush Lamartine. Through these three characters and their various offspring, Erdrich explores such themes as love, tradition, abandonment, guilt, death, sex and sexuality, commodification/commercialization, religion, parenthood, and survival. Love Medicine is a delightful, complex, and moving story. Its interwoven tales can be sometimes confusing, sometimes ambiguous, and sometimes hard to read. But because it tells the story of a generation of Indians whose lives were almost always confusing, ambiguous, and hard, this approach seems quite appropriate. Jennifer McClinton-Temple
Abandonment in Love Medicine
As a child, June Morrissey Kashpaw, the character whose death scene opens Louise Erdrich’s Love Medicine, was abandoned by her alcoholic mother, Lucille. She lives alone in the woods, no one knows for how long, surviving off pine sap, grass, and the buds from trees. Eventually, she is brought to
412â•…â•… Louise Erdrich Lucille’s sister Marie, who takes her in and cares for her as if she were her own child; indeed, June becomes so special to Marie that “It wasn’t long before I would want to hold her against me tighter than any of the others.” However tight she holds her, though, Marie cannot erase the wound of June’s abandonment. Even as a young child, June seems to have a death wish, exhorting her young cousins to hang her in the woods during their pretend game of “horse thief ” and cursing Marie when she puts an end to the game just in time. June goes on to abandon others throughout her life, almost pathologically. She abandons Marie by going into the woods to live with Eli, her uncle. She abandons both her children, King and Lipsha, even going so far as to attempt to drown Lipsha in the slough before giving him to Marie, as she herself had been given so long ago. She abandons her husband Gordie, who then descends into an alcoholic madness in which he is visited by her ghost, just as many other characters will be throughout the Little No Horse series. It is as though June, by continuing to leave those who love her in increasingly dramatic fashion, is making sure she will be missed, as she was decidedly not as a nine-year-old child foraging in the woods. While June might be the most dramatic case of abandonment in the novel, other characters are motivated by this theme as well. Marie feels abandonment throughout life. She is neither Indian nor white, and she must face the stigma of her family, the Lazarres, hated by all on the reservation. In an attempt to find belonging, she goes to live at the convent, where she is subsequently abused by the sadistic Sister Leopolda. As Marie battles Leopolda, she feels abandoned by God as the devil, or the “dark fish” tries to take her soul. She escapes this horror and literally runs into Nector, her future husband, on her run from the convent. Nector and Marie marry and have many children, but they can never really be said to have made a life together. Marie props up the worthless Nector, running the household, getting him involved in tribal leadership, and generally creating a situation whereby he need do nothing— only to be abandoned by him in favor of Lulu, her longtime rival. Lulu herself has been scarred by her mother’s abandonment of her. However, unlike June and
Marie, Lulu was abandoned by Fleur “for her own good.” As the U.S. government’s policies increasingly impoverished the tribe, Fleur sent Lulu to boarding school. After her return, it becomes clear that no good came from that move. Lulu spends the rest of her life using her considerable charms to move from man to man, forcing herself into a position in which she will only be the abandoner and never the abandonee. Moses, Beverly, Nector, and other unnamed men who are the fathers of her children are left in succession as Lulu cuts a swath through life. Her children, however, remain with her always, indicating that Lulu prizes above all the mother-child bond that she feels Fleur had broken. Finally, in what is possibly the most widely anthologized section of Love Medicine, the chapter entitled “The Red Convertible,” both Henry Jr. and Lyman must deal with intense feelings of abandonment—feelings that drive one of them to suicide. Henry has returned from the Vietnam War traumatized by what he has seen and done. Like many Vietnam veterans, he feels as though the country for which he risked his life abandoned him when the war became so unpopular. Lyman, for his part, worships his older brother and feels that the loss of that vital connection, which is damaged when Henry returns and severed when he drowns himself in the river, has left him alone in the world. However, Lyman turns his feelings of abandonment into work, becoming a driven, workaholic businessman in the process. So many of the characters in this novel feel the effects of abandonment, just as American Indians as a whole were abandoned by the U.S. government. Some, like Marie, are just written off as unworthy; others, like Lulu, are abandoned for “their own good.” In Erdrich’s narrative, abandonment and the different effects it has on human beings illustrate well the depths of pain generated by those betrayals. Jennifer McClinton-Temple
Sex and Sexuality in Love Medicine
In Love Medicine, Louise Erdrich uses the theme of sex and sexuality to give her characters hope and to bind them to their traditions. She also uses this powerful and controversial theme to dramatize the negative aspects of life on the Turtle Mountain
Love Medicineâ•…â•… 413 reservation, specifically hopelessness and the feeling of worthlessness. In the first chapter of the text, “The World’s Greatest Fishermen,” we meet June, who is hopeless, alone, and defiantly out of touch with her family and community. She picks up a stranger in a bar, leaves with him, and has uncomfortable sex with him in his truck. When she meets this man, June is living in a hotel room that has no lock on the door, has not eaten for days, and is wearing torn clothes because she has nothing else. She leaves her room with the intent of taking a bus home to the reservation, but she sees this man as potentially “different.” June sees herself very much like the Easter eggs she and the man peel and eat as they sit at the bar—brightly colored on the outside, if a bit cracked and faded, but easily consumed on the inside. In fact, during the encounter in the truck, June sees herself as nothing more than a commodity. She feels the truck’s heater on her shoulder, opening like a “pair of jaws,” and has the sensation of lying vulnerable “before a great wide mouth.” When his slick down vest presses against her body, she feels as though she is being “rubbed by an enormous tongue.” After the man falls asleep, June quietly exits the truck, falling out into the snow in a “shock like being born.” Then, feeling herself pure and new, she sets out to walk home to the reservation and is never seen again. June sees herself as a commodity, and a shabby one at that. In this scene, by giving herself up one last time, freely and of her own accord, she feels she is reborn. Erdrich leaves this rebirth ambiguous, though; although June commits suicide by walking off into the snow, she is also able to come back as a spirit, in this book and in others, to help those people in her life whom she left behind. Another instance in the text where sex is simultaneously a tragedy and a new beginning is Marie and Nector’s first encounter, which occurs in the chapter “Wild Geese.” Marie, having just run from the convent and the tortures of Sister Leopolda, literally runs into Nector coming up the hill. Nector has been strolling along thinking of Lulu—thinking of her, much as June thought of herself, as an object to be consumed. He thinks: “She is a tart berry full of juice, and I know she is mine.” When he slams into Marie, he is led unwittingly into a
sexual encounter that ultimately leaves him badly “weakened.” He says, “I am caught. I give way. I cannot help myself, because, to my everlasting wonder, Marie is all tight plush acceptance.” Like June’s encounter described above, this incident illuminates the reservation women’s general lack of self-worth and the men’s tendency to take advantage of that lack. However, it also serves to bind Nector and Marie—forever, it turns out—in a bond that is both loving and reflective of traditional reservation values. While Nector and Marie are definitely bound, he cannot forget the memory of Lulu, who remains for him that illusive “berry.” The idea of women as food, both nourishing and necessary, yet at the same time a consumable object, reaches its zenith when Lulu and Nector finally consummate their longheld attraction. Smearing Lulu with the melting butter they are supposed to delivering around the reservation, Nector gives in to his desire, betrays Marie, and winds up being used himself in the process. For Lulu, unlike all the other women in the text, has learned to take advantage of sex. Lulu uses men, beginning with Moses Pillager, the most traditional man around, instead of letting men use her. Lulu goes to Moses when she is young in order to challenge every rule that surrounds her upbringing. Moses is “too old” for her, and “too close a relation.” He is also “bent” in the mind, but he is living as traditional a life as anyone on the reservation. Lulu begins her sexual conquests with Moses, going to his island, seducing him, getting pregnant, and then leaving the island to have the baby. She will go on to have a string of boys with different fathers, each binding her to a different family on the reservation. Lulu knows her worth; she values her place in the world as a mother of sons and takes advantage of the men she encounters, before they can take advantage of her. Jennifer McClinton-Temple
Survival in Love Medicine
In much of American Indian literature, survival is a major theme. The concept of staying alive, staying viable against the odds, drives many aspects of Indian culture in the contemporary era. In Love Medicine we see the spirit of survival in several different guises: We see it in traditions, in families, and
414â•…â•… Erdrich, Louise in individual people, and we also see how the novel makes a larger statement about the survival of Indians and Indian culture in the 20th century. Tradition survives among the Indians on the Little No Horse reservation. We see this perhaps most clearly in the title chapter. Lipsha, determined to win the heart of his grandfather back for his grandmother, attempts to make a love medicine, an ancient bundle of magic that will shift Nector’s allegiance away from Lulu and back to Marie. Lipsha says, in reference to the old native religion, “Our Gods aren’t perfect, is what I’m saying, but at least they come around. They’ll do a favor if you ask them right.” Because the native Gods are, in a sense, still around, Lipsha is able to imagine himself a medicine man and devise his own love medicine for Nector. However, because survival is survival, not necessarily domination, his plan goes a bit awry. He tries to take a short cut, buys two frozen turkey hearts instead of the hearts of live Canada Geese he originally sought to procure, and tells Marie to eat one herself and feed the other to Nector, who promptly chokes and dies. What is so important about this chapter in terms of survival, however, is that even though Nector passes away, due in part to Lipsha’s botched attempt at traditional medicine, the Kashpaw family and the larger tribe around them survive this death. In fact, Nector himself survives the death, as he comes back to his family as a ghost. Erdrich provides an excellent metaphor here for Indian survival. Even if the visible signs of life have gone, the spirit still lingers, and lingers palpably, enabling the survival of the culture as a whole. In the chapter entitled “The Tomahawk Factory,” we see another story of survival, both individual and collective. Lyman, deep in the depths of depression following his brother Henry’s suicide, about which he is experiencing the guilt of a survivor, says he has sunk to a place so low that he is unable to move from it. But, like the many survivors before him, he pulls himself up from the depths and soon finds himself in charge of a large Bureau of Indian Affairs–run factory on the reservation. Ironically, the Indians make plastic facsimiles of their traditions—tomahawks, cradleboards, purses, moccasins, and so forth. It would be easy to read this state of affairs as a fail-
ure to survive—sacred traditions reduced to plastic, people with once vast lands crowded onto a reservation. However, Erdrich wants the reader to look deeper here: What has survived, without question, are the Ojibwe (Chippewa) people and their spirit. For instance, Lulu tells Lyman before the factory opens, “I’ve got your job applicants broken down to clans and families. Hire ten from each column and you’ll be all right.” That the clans and families have survived through years of relocation, disease, and poverty is far more important than the actual goods they will be making in that factory. Just as important as the stories of group survival in Love Medicine are the stories of individual survival, the most dramatic of which is the story of Marie. In the chapter entitled “Saint Marie,” Marie’s story is told in graphic detail. She has escaped from the squalor of the Lazarre home, only to enter the depraved world of Sister Leopolda. Leopolda has convinced a vulnerable Marie that she and the devil are in a fight for Marie’s soul. She beats Marie with a poker, pours boiling water in her ear, and eventually stabs her in the hand and knocks her unconscious. Marie not only survives this beating but comes to see that she can have strength even after having been brought so low. She says, “Rise up!╯.╯.╯. Rise up and walk! There is no limit to this dust!” And Marie will survive this having been brought to dust; she will survive to create a family and be counted the strongest among them. Like the rest of her tribe, and the rest of the community in Love Medicine, she will embody both the kind of survival that is just barely alive and the kind of survival that is thriving in the face of oppression. Jennifer McClinton-Temple
ERDRICH, LOUISEâ•… Tracksâ•… (1988)
Tracks is Louise Erdrich’s second in a series of interrelated novels that depict a fictional Ojibwe (Chippewa) reservation in North Dakota. The novel’s action takes place between 1912 and 1924, the years preceding the action in Erdrich’s first novel, Love Medicine, and details key events of the preceding generation. Tracks depicts a time of social and geographic upheaval as the federal land policies set forth in the Dawes and Burke Acts provide
Tracksâ•…â•… 415 incentives for some tribal members to sell their land allotments to timber companies. The resulting economic and bureaucratic transformation attacks traditional ways of life on the reservation. Against the backdrop of these challenges, the novel details the complicated relationship between Fleur Pillager and Eli Kashpaw as well as that between Nanapush and Margaret Kashpaw, and it traces Pauline Puyat’s path to becoming the nun Sister Leopolda. Unlike Love Medicine, Tracks proceeds chronologically, but the plot structure is complicated by alternating narrators. Pauline’s idiosyncratic Catholicism and self-righteous nature result in an unreliable narration that contrasts with Nanapush’s traditional, wise, and compassionate perspective. Their competing narratives create a plot that is, at times, contradictory and that reflects the ambiguity of oral storytelling. Ultimately, the novel centers on themes including survival, family, tradition, commodification/commercialization, parenthood, and suffering. Readers meet characters who lose land, health, loved ones, and a personal sense of security. However, despite the bleak world shaped by winter, famine, illness, and cruelty, Erdrich’s novel is resolute in depicting characters who find ways to adapt and survive. David Allred
Family in Tracks
Family interactions provide people with security and fulfillment as well as conflict and sorrow, and this conflicted inheritance forms one of the themes in Louise Erdrich’s Tracks. As in many of Erdrich’s interconnected novels, the world of Tracks is inhabited by members of a handful of families: the Pillagers, the Morrisseys, the Lazarres, the Kashpaws, and others. These family identities serve as a key mode of characterization so that a character’s personality is often influenced by his or her family ties. For example, the Pillagers are practitioners of traditional healing and knowledge and because of this are respected and feared by others. This family identity informs Fleur’s seemingly supernatural power to evade death, to bargain for the life of her children, and to harm men who wrong her. In contrast to the respect afforded the Pillagers, the Morrisseys
and Lazarres are more dubious families, and given his family identity, Napoleon Morrissey’s lechery is hardly a surprise to informed readers. However, at the same time that Tracks suggests fixed family identities, the novel also shows dynamic elements of family formation in the fused clan of Nanapush, Margaret, Fleur, Eli, and Lulu. Nanapush adopts Fleur as a kind of daughter after her family dies of disease at the beginning of the novel. Later, Margaret comes to live with Nanapush along with her son, Eli, who has children with Fleur. Pauline observes (from the outside) that “[the group] formed a kind of clan, the new made up of bits of the old.” Together, this fused family earns money to pay taxes on the land, supports one another in sickness, and struggles for survival during cold, grim winters. Given such descriptions of family interaction, Tracks clearly shows the nurturing power of family and the pathos of broken family bonds. As part of this theme, both Fleur and Pauline search for a place to belong, and both become mothers during the course of the book’s events; however, their experiences contrast sharply. Both are essentially homeless early in the novel, but after living with the Morrisseys, Pauline eventually becomes Sister Leopolda and finds a home in the convent. Fleur loses her family at the novel’s outset but finds a home with Nanapush, Eli, and Margaret. On these quests to find a home, both women also have children. However, their responses to motherhood are very different: Fleur struggles for her children, while Pauline abandons her child. Fleur gives Lulu her own food and is highly protective of Lulu by not allowing her out of her sight. She also shows a mother’s tender regard: After losing a baby in childbirth, Fleur and Eli bury the child in the traditional Ojibwe way, by wrapping the body and tying it high in a tree. In anguish over her loss, “Fleur [hears] her vanished child in every breath of wind, every tick of dried leaves, every scratch of blowing snow,” and when a fierce storm comes, Fleur disappears into the woods to place an umbrella over the body. In contrast to Fleur’s deep and fierce love, Pauline heartlessly abandons her child. When she is pregnant with Marie, Pauline tries to force a miscarriage and asks for an abortion. During childbirth, she refuses to push, being willing to die and take
416â•…â•… Erdrich, Louise the baby with her, and after giving birth, she abandons the child to Bernadette. Pauline’s refusal to be touched by human connections is made all the more tragic in light of Fleur’s struggle for those she loves and loses. In fact, the backdrop of the entire novel is formed from Fleur’s familial losses, specifically Lulu’s estrangement from her mother. Nanapush’s narration is in the second person and is addressed to an older Lulu in an attempt to help her understand her mother’s choices. In other Erdrich novels, readers learn that in her quest to regain her land, Fleur is forced to send Lulu to an Indian boarding school, and Lulu’s suffering there eventually causes deep resentment. In explaining Fleur’s actions, Nanapush conveys the tragedy of their estrangement: “I have seen each one of you since then, in your separate lives, never together, never the way it should be.” Tracks shows the bonds of sacrifice and love that connect Fleur, the mother, with Lulu, the child, and in showing those bonds being severed, Erdrich underscores the novel with the tragedy of family loss. David Allred
Survival in Tracks
Survival is a central theme in Louise Erdrich’s Tracks; in fact, the novel opens with a dramatic scene of survival by one of its most resilient characters, Fleur Pillager. Amid an epidemic of consumption (tuberculosis), Fleur is discovered barely alive in the cold home of her family, all of whom have died of the disease. Nursed back to health, Fleur is believed to be the last of the Pillagers, and she exhibits her ability to endure many times as she grows older. In Argus, a nearby town, she is assaulted by three men after she repeatedly beats them at poker; however, despite the emotional and physical trauma of the attack, she shows no weakness: “[S]he was not beaten, there was no sign of trouble.” Fleur also survives life-threatening childbirth and a winter-long famine. Not one to suffer passively, Fleur also resists one of the most serious attacks against her identity. When her land around Lake Matchimanito, which has strong spiritual and familial significance, is sold to a timber company, she sabotages the trees so that they fall on the workers clear-cutting the land. She
then leaves to take revenge on the man responsible. Ultimately, her survival has its roots in her fierceness and her connection to Ojibwe traditions. Another main character in the novel, Pauline, is a survivor in a different sense. The voyeuristic Pauline takes pleasure in watching others’ struggles for survival. She witnesses, without helping, Fleur during both her assault in Argus and her premature labor. She also becomes an undertaker, thrilled by the power of witnessing the moment of death as one living. She confides, “I alone, watching, filled with breath, knew death as a form of grace.” At the same time, Pauline possesses an instinct for selfpreservation. In the novel, she narrates her battle with the lake monster, who in reality is Napoleon, the lecherous father of her child. She also survives her own religious mortification, resists Nanapush’s mockery, and in the end is reborn in her life as a nun, including taking on new name: Sister Leopolda. Erdrich’s novel presents the idea of survival in other characters as well. For example, Dutch James is a tragic survivor. One of Fleur’s attackers, he is the lone survivor of being locked in a freezer for days, although, the frostbite is so severe that he endures amputation after amputation. On the other hand, after her son’s sexual indiscretion with Sophie Morrissey, Margaret is kidnapped by Clarence Morrissey and Boy Lazarre, who shave her head to shame her. Rather than accepting the shame, she retains her dignity and is buoyed by Fleur, who shaves her own hair in solidarity. Dutch and Margaret both represent survival in the face of great suffering and the endurance required to live through such pain. Finally, in addition to portraying individual characters who survive hardships in their lives, Tracks also presents the resilience, efficacy, and continued relevance of tribal traditions. For example, Nanapush uses traditional songs to guide Eli on his moose hunt during a famine, and Fleur finds strength from the sacred land on Lake Matchimanito. This tribal survival occurs in the face of exploitation by timber companies, damaging governmental oversight of tribal affairs, and intertribal conflict. The novel’s ending strikingly articulates this central conflict of tradition’s survival in the face of outside influences. The novel opens with Fleur’s
Tracksâ•…â•… 417 survival from disease. It ends with her daughter Lulu’s unyielding resistance to the cultural oppression of Indian boarding schools that would strip Native Americans of their language and traditions. Nanapush remembers how Lulu showed the signs of the harsh discipline as she returned from boarding school. At same time, her fierceness, inherited from her mother, was still apparent: Her “grin was bold as [her] mother’s.” Seeing this symbol of survival, Nanapush speaks for the Ojibwe and uses the symbolism of timber exploitation to affirm tribal tradition’s resolution to persevere: “We gave against your rush like creaking oaks, held on, braced ourselves together in the fierce dry wind.” Despite the challenges both individuals and a people face, Tracks affirms the possibility of survival—in fact, the novel argues for its inevitability. David Allred
Tradition in Tracks
The fictional North Dakota reservation Louise Erdrich has created in her novels is a place where Ojibwe religion, customs, and practices hold great significance. References to Ojibwe mythological figures as well as healing and hunting practices are extensive and appear alongside the Catholicism and other traditions of Euro-American settlers. Although the authenticity of the traditions Erdrich depicts have a complicated relationship to actual traditions of the Ojibwe (Chippewa) people, these traditions—within the context of the book—form the plot’s emotional core, enliven the text and provide readers clues to understanding characters. Tracks is filled with examples of Ojibwe traditions contributing to its plot and character development. For example, the area surrounding Lake Matchimanito is sacred to Fleur’s family, and, indicative of this significance, Fleur has Eli place the body of her deceased infant not in the ground but in a tree, according to Ojibwe custom. Thereafter, “Fleur heard her vanished child in every breath of wind, every tick of dried leaves, every scratch of blowing snow.” The child is symbolic of Fleur’s familial and traditional connection to the land and trees, and this fact clarifies why Fleur does all in her power to save them from being taken by tax collectors and timber companies, including sabotaging the
trees so they fall on the timber company’s workers. In this case, a character’s traditions are the motivation for her actions as the plot unfolds. The two narrators can also be understood in reference to tradition as both are associated with mythological figures in Ojibwe worldviews. Over the course of the novel, Pauline takes on the qualities of the windigo, a mythical figure associated with winter, ice, hunger (even cannibalism), and skeletons. In one of her narrated chapters, she reveals these characteristics: “All winter, my blood never thawed. My stomach never filled. My hands were chafed raw. And yet I grew strong.” Later, she calls herself “a coarse hulk of bones.” When she witnesses an assault on Fleur and when she acts as an undertaker, she is also empty and voyeuristic, symbolically filling herself with the experiences of others—a sort of experiential cannibalism. Nanapush also can be understood in reference to Ojibwe mythology. Both his name and actions are reminiscent of Nanabozho, the heroic and articulate Ojibwe trickster figure who is hopelessly controlled by his appetites at the same time as he preserves cultural knowledge and possessions. The similarities become apparent with Nanapush’s explanation of his name: “It’s got to do with trickery and living in the bush.╯.╯.╯. It’s got to do with something a girl can’t resist. The first Nanapush stole fire. [I] steal hearts.” Elsewhere, Nanapush employs his vast traditional knowledge to cure and to ensure successful hunting, and he directs his entire narration to Fleur’s daughter in the hope she will understand her mother’s actions in terms of Ojibwe culture. Like other tricksters, however, Nanapush also cannot resist sex, food, and verbal play. This final attribute is evident as he mocks Pauline’s brutal and remarkably creative selfmortification. Thus, in the case of both Pauline and Nanapush, knowing the novel’s basis in tradition adds to one’s understanding of the characters. However, it is incorrect to assume that all the traditions in the novel are Ojibwe. The customs and beliefs of Tracks’s characters are evolving, and they reflect the cultural complexity resulting from EuroAmerican migration into the Great Lakes region. For characters like Pauline and Margaret, Catholic traditions have as at least as much relevance as Ojibwe traditions, and the two exist side by side.
418â•…â•… Euripides For example, Pauline hangs a dreamcatcher made by Moses Pillager, a guardian of Ojibwe traditional healing and religious practices, alongside a crucifix in her room. And while crossing Lake Matchimanito in a leaky canoe, Margaret prays to both Ojibwe and Catholic figures: “She alternated .╯.╯. addressing different Manitous along with the Blessed Virgin and Her heart, the sacred bloody lump that the bluerobed women held in the awful picture Margaret kept nailed to the wall.” Thus, the setting of Tracks is one where traditions overlap. Furthermore, at times these complicated cultural scenes lead to conflict. When Nanapush is attempting to heal Fleur, Pauline disrupts the traditional ceremony, explaining, “I’m sent to prove Christ’s ways.” It is Margaret who uses a stick to try to rid the group of Pauline’s unwanted presence and worldview. The conflict of traditions is evident and complicated in this scene as well as in the novel itself. David Allred
EURIPIDESâ•… Medeaâ•… (431 b.c.)
There have been several versions of the myth of Medea. Medea’s character, motivation and many actions associated with her continuously evolved and took many forms. In the lean economy of a Greek tragedy, Medea acquires a sharper profile, a rigorous motivation, and an intenser response to the events of the play. Euripides thus transforms her into a figure of tragic proportions. While Jason’s rejection destroys her social and personal identity and leaves her floundering for breath, she successfully wrests charge of the context of her life and from then on controls every event and action of the play. The legendary Medea is a woman scorned. She is determined to wreak vengeance for the wrong done to her by her husband, Jason. She holds center stage for the justness of her cause when she speaks to “[w]omen of Corinth.” She had loved Jason, become an instrument of his success, saved his life, and betrayed her father and her home to help him gain the golden fleece even at the cost of rendering herself a traitor to her country. She claims to have been wronged, insulted, and betrayed, “her bed dishonoured.” She curses the “evil power love has in people’s lives” and regrets her “folly committed long
ago, when I / was ready to desert my father’s house, won over / by eloquence from a Greek.” She blames gods, her infatuation with Jason, and her own evilhearted machinations for her ruination. But her anger is unappeasable, and her desire for revenge is ultimately her undoing. The playwright, Euripides (ca. 484–406 b.c.), denounces Medea’s unnatural actions. The chorus calls her “Bloody handed fiend of vengeance,” and Jason equates her with “hatred and murder”—“no woman, but a tiger; a Tuscan Scylla,—but more savage.” Yet Euripides imposes on the character of Medea a degree of coherence and credibility. He considers her anguish human, even when he considers her actions unnatural. His primary interest in the play is to focus on evil in humans. He perceives an inescapable conflict between claims of the fragile high Grecian ideals of control, order, and moderation on the one hand and uncontrollable human passions on the other. Euripides’ interest in Medea’s status as woman in an essentially patriarchal society and her status as an alien in Greek society have led to Medea being read as a proto-feminist as well as postcolonial text. Gulshan Taneja
Abandonment in Medea
Euripides is widely regarded as a realist in that, though he deals with mythological characters, some of whom have familial ties to the gods (Medea herself is the granddaughter of Helius), his plays revolve around human conflict and a virtuous representation of emotional response. So it is with the tragedian’s treatment of the theme of abandonment, which drives the plot of Medea. The play’s original Athenian audience would have already known the back story and would thus have understood that, long before the action of Euripides’ work, Medea and her husband, Jason, abandoned their homelands before arriving in Corinth, the play’s setting. Each has been displaced following Medea’s acts of familial murder. Each murder was motivated by the deep love Medea felt for Jason. Far from being a given circumstance of the tragedy, loss of one’s homeland is a woe actively lamented by the Chorus of Corinthian Women. Medea has willingly abandoned her homeland and her sense of familial loyalty. She reminds Jason of
Medeaâ•…â•… 419 this sacrifice and how she “willingly betrayed [her] father and [her] home.” This act of abandonment was no small matter, and Medea herself admits that it demonstrated “more willingness to help than wisdom.” Now, after committing these crimes in Colchis and Iolcus, Medea has landed in Corinth with her beloved, only to see her husband take another wife— the daughter of Corinth’s king, Creon. Though Jason argues that he has taken a royal wife in order to provide financial security for his family and to secure good faith with the royal house of Corinth, Medea sees the marriage as an act of selfish abandonment; hence, she “call[s] down wicked curses on the king’s family” and thus dooms herself and her children to exile, setting in motion the play’s tragic events. It is worth noting that, in the discussion of Jason’s abandonment of Medea in favor of a new wife, Euripides attaches a comment on gender roles and the discrepancy between acts of abandonment considered acceptable for men as opposed to those of women. Medea laments, “We women are the most unfortunate creatures .╯.╯. she arrives among new modes of behavior and manners,” ostensibly abandoning her customs in favor of her husband’s, while “[a] man, when he’s tired of the company in his home, goes out of the house and puts an end to his boredom.” She adds, “[W]e are forced to keep our eyes on one alone.” The sympathetic chorus echoes her outrage, saying, “You sailed away from your father’s home.╯.╯.╯. And now in a foreign country .╯.╯. another queen has disposed you and is mistress of your home.” Jason is certainly culpable, for in Euripides’ account, Jason seems unaffected by the news that his children are to be exiled along with Medea. Thus, his rationalization for the new marriage breaks down. Even Medea’s servants feel the sting of abandonment. The children’s tutor points out the fickle nature of loyalty when he says, “Old ties give way to new ones. As for Jason, he no longer has a feeling for this house of ours.” Giving in to her sense of rejection and her feelings of abandonment, Medea then plots to repay Jason many times over. She announces that she will murder his new bride and her own children in order to leave Jason without a family and home. Here,
the theme of abandonment transcends the realm of interpersonal relationships, giving audiences insight into Medea’s relationship with herself. She abandons rational thought and behavior, and the chorus, though still sympathetic to her plight, begs Medea to take a more rational course of action as her chosen course does not represent “the normal ways of mankind.” Euripides makes it clear that Medea has moments of lucidity but quickly dismisses them in favor of rage (an unfortunate but completely human response). What is superhuman is Medea’s ability to use her sorcerer’s powers to manufacture the poisoned dress and diadem she sends to Jason’s new bride. She sends the gifts via her children under the guise of a peace offering, a plea to let her children remain in Corinth. This sets in motion the death of Creon’s daughter and Creon himself. After making the children accessories to murder, Medea rationalizes their murder, arguing that they, like her, will find no safety in Corinth, thus abandoning her maternal nature. The flaw with this excuse is that Medea has planned her escape, having made a deal with Aegeus to seek refuge in his house in Athens. She could have taken the children with her. In fact, she does leave with their bodies so that Jason may not even give them a burial or mourn them properly. Her goal is to leave Jason completely and utterly abandoned. Her plan succeeds, for in the end, Jason feels the pangs of loss as Medea abandons him in Corinth, flying away in a dragon-drawn chariot (the only true element of fantasy to invade the narrative). Appropriate to his status as a classic realist, Euripides focuses not on the relationship between gods and mortals but on the tragic potential inherent within human relationships gone awry. Medea abandons her homeland for love, and when that love is betrayed by Jason, she plots to repay his abandonment by leaving him completely and utterly alone. Adrian L. Cook
Gender in Medea
Set in an Athenian society that does not treat women equally, Euripides’ Medea provides a classic account of one woman’s struggle (Medea) to engage in subversive actions to defy the oppressive
420â•…â•… Euripides impact of patriarchal rule. In Medea, gender serves as a dominant and significant source of conflict. A truly subversive character, Medea makes a dramatic effort to redefine gender and expose double standards associated with it. In her first speech to the women of Corinth about her sorrow after her husband ( Jason) leaves her for another woman, she laments the plight of women by emphasizing that men fail to understand that women do not “lead an easy life, safe at home while they risk all at the point of a spear,” but she contends that she would “rather stand three times in battle with shield and spear than give birth once.” Medea complicates the traditional notion of the role of a woman by arguing that she would much rather replace her “easy life” with the dangers men experience in battle. Therefore, she provides a subversive view of what the female gender is capable of and questions men’s traditional notion of the natural desire of women to reproduce. In essence, she posits that men are the individuals who really live the “easy life.” Medea’s argument is so subversive and shocking because Athenian women were expected to refrain from anything that would be perceived as “masculine.” Her argument highlights the capability of women to participate in war—undermining this capability as an inherently masculine attribute. In her first speech to the women of Corinth, Medea also exposes the double standard that exists in the expectations of married women by noting that married men have the liberty to engage in sexual relations with other women, but married women, are constrained by the expectation that “on one man we’re forced to fix our gaze.” Thus, Medea’s argument emphasizes one inherent inequality in the social construction of gender: Men have unrestricted freedom to leave a marriage without any repercussions, but “divorce discredits women utterly.” Although Medea makes a salient effort to challenge the inferior status of women and fight against the oppression of women, the support of the female chorus for Medea’s plan of revenge demonstrates that there is a strong desire for women to subvert the patriarchal ideology that subjugates their lives. The Chorus in Medea plays an instrumental role in helping the reader to understand the desire of a significant number of women to challenge
the oppressive social conditions under which they live. After Medea makes her first speech to the women of Corinth and solicits their support for her aspirations to seek revenge on Jason (Medea’s husband) for abandoning her for another woman, she asks the chorus not to disclose her plan of revenge. The chorus leader indicates her strong approval of Medea’s plan of revenge by contending that Medea’s “cause is just, for you are wronged. Your husband must be punished. I understand your grief, and that it seeks relief.” With such support, Medea’s plan of revenge becomes more than just a simple plan of revenge but a tangible expression of all women’s dissatisfaction with male dominance and the patriarchal ideology responsible for women’s oppression. When the chorus leader says that she “understands” Medea’s “grief,” the reader can perceive that one of the fundamental reasons for this understanding stems from the influence of gender relations. While the chorus understands the complexity and consequences of Medea’s plan of revenge, they also understand female solidarity is essential if her plan of attacking patriarchal ideology is to be effective. Gender plays an instrumental role in Medea in illuminating the inequalities that have historically existed in the power relations between men and women. While Medea’s plan of revenge involves the unbearable act of murdering her children, this act evinces the importance of attacking the bondage of gender inequalities in this historical setting. Medea underscores the importance of female solidarity in overcoming gender inequalities and demonstrates that one individual can bring about meaningful change. Antonio Maurice Daniels
Suffering in Medea
Greek tragedy always examines human suffering, and Euripides found an excellent vehicle in the story of Medea. The play opens with the Nurse’s description of Medea’s condition as one of perpetual agony: “She lies without food and gives herself up to suffering, wasting away every moment of the day in tears. So it has gone since she knew herself slighted by [her husband].” This opening speech continues, painting a vivid picture of the given circumstances
Medeaâ•…â•… 421 of the drama. Medea finds herself in mourning for love lost (since her husband Jason has chosen a new royal bride) and for the country she left and the kin she has murdered to assist Jason in his ascent to greatness. Jason begins the cycle of suffering within the play proper by betraying his marital loyalty to Medea. The Nurse, the Tutor, and all of the servants and slaves are “distressed by [the] wrongs” done to Medea. However, Medea herself magnifies that suffering. The fact that she is described as having “given herself up to suffering” is telling. Euripides’ dialogue leads the reader to the conclusion that, though she has undoubtedly been wronged by Jason’s betrayal, Medea chooses to be consumed by her grief. This consumption causes Medea to be a conduit and perpetuator of suffering rather than a passive victim of fate like other tragic heroes, such as Sophocles’ Oedipus. From her first appearance, Medea’s suffering is explosive, foreshadowing the full venom of her wrath. She says, “Ah, I have suffered. What should be wept for bitterly. I hate you, children of a hateful mother. I curse you and your father. Let the whole house crash.” Both Medea’s reputation for inflicting suffering in her former homelands and her present rants earn her and her children banishment from Corinth. Creon is rightly afraid that Medea will cause suffering in his kingdom. Throughout the play, Medea is cautioned not to let her anger and suffering overtake her sense of reason, but neither Jason’s pleas nor those of the chorus prove effective. Jason admonishes Medea, noting how “hopeless it is to deal with [her] stubborn temper.” He informs her, “You might have lived in this land and kept your home” had it not been for “your loose speaking.” It is true that Jason is not blameless. Whether or not the marriage to Creon’s daughter would have given Medea and her children financial security and protection, Jason has broken his vows of loyalty to her. However, by reacting as she does, Medea has, in essence, escalated her own suffering by begging for exile. To extrapolate, her pride (ego) is so wounded that she blinds herself to the possibility of acceptance.
Even the chorus, a sympathetic body of Corinthian women, advises Medea against exacting revenge by perpetuating suffering. When speaking with the chorus, Medea makes no bones about her desire to murder Jason’s bride, but she does try to rationalize her decision to murder her children. She announces her intention, declaring, “[T]hose children he had from me he will never see again, nor will he on his new bride beget another child, for she is to be forced to die a most terrible death,” and she argues that such a plan is “the best way to wound my husband.” Later, however, she changes her rationalization for killing her children. She argues that, since she sent the children to unwittingly poison Creon’s daughter, they will be punished, too. (It should be noted here that if Medea had chosen to send true gifts with the children in lieu of poisoned ones, her children would have been allowed to stay in Corinth and thus escape their share of suffering.) In the end, as Medea prepares to fly from Corinth with the children’s dead bodies, she reverts to her original claim that by murdering Jason’s seed, she makes him suffer most gravely. Therefore, the reader can see that Medea’s rationalizations are tactical. Such cunning clearly indicates that Medea does choose both to succumb to and to inflict intense suffering. Euripides’ tragedy is an honest if shocking examination of the destructive power of human suffering and the ego’s response to personal slights, for Medea constructs and perpetuates suffering throughout the drama. In fact, the only character who does not directly suffer is Aegeus, the Athenian king with whom Medea seeks asylum after the play’s conclusion. Having brought suffering upon her father’s family in pursuit of love before the curtain rises, she begins the play wounded by Jason and repays those who collectively break her heart with a wholly disproportionate response. Medea’s infliction of suffering is ultimately driven by pride and egoistic response. Thus, Euripides expands the theme of suffering to demonstrate that suffering begets suffering in an all-consuming cycle unless one makes the conscious choice to break it. Adrian L. Cook
part ii
Authors and Works F–M `
FAULKNER, WILLIAMâ•… As I Lay Dyingâ•… (1930)
As I Lay Dying, one of the finest examples of William Faulkner’s distinctive writing style, was first published in 1930. The novel is the first to introduce Faulkner’s fictional Yoknapatawpha County, which serves as the setting for many of his novels and short stories. As in his other works, As I Lay Dying showcases Faulkner’s ability to reveal the intricacy of the human psyche. Told from multiple perspectives, the novel has 59 sections written mostly in stream-of-consciousness—a literary style marked by a character’s uninterrupted flow of thoughts. Also, Faulkner uniquely employs symbols throughout his work. For example, he substitutes a coffin symbol in place of the actual word and uses a blank space when one of his characters is unable to express her thoughts. As I Lay Dying tells the story of the Bundrens—a poor family from the Deep South—that faces trials and tragedy on their journey to bury their dead wife and mother in the town of Jefferson. Throughout the story, the reader is introduced to the family members and discovers that each has his or her own reason for traveling to Jefferson. For instance, Anse Bundren, husband and father, sets off for Jefferson to buy a new set of teeth and to remarry, while his daughter, Dewey Dell, goes to town to get an abortion. Each character shares his or her perspective on
the journey, with the exception of Jewel Bundren, the only character who does not have his own section. Through the Bundrens’ expedition, Faulkner discusses such themes as family, death, individual and society, religion, and suffering. As I Lay Dying is a complex story that causes the reader to question the characters’ motives in their actions and interpretations of events. Most of all, it is a story that explores the complexities of human nature. HanaRae Dudek
Family in As I Lay Dying
423
William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying centers on the Bundrens—a poor southern family that embarks on a journey to the town of Jefferson to bury the dead wife and mother. Throughout the novel, the Bundrens exhibit their dysfunctional relationships with one another as each family member offers his or her own perspective on the other characters and their actions. In As I Lay Dying, Faulkner demonstrates how a group of people can band together in times of adversity and tragedy yet can criticize and even abandon each other in pursuit of their own selfish exploits—all in the name of “family.” From the beginning of the novel, members of the Bundren family display their complex relationships with one another. While Addie Bundren lies dying, her son Cash builds a coffin outside of her window.
424â•…â•… Faulkner, William He insists on finishing the coffin because he values his carpentry work more than spending time with his ailing mother. However, Cash also believes that he is helping her more by building her coffin than he could if he were sitting with her inside of the house. Surprisingly, Addie does not seem offended by her son building the coffin right in front of her. When Addie dies, her husband, Anse, insists upon the family traveling to Jefferson to bury his wife, at any cost. He maintains that she must be buried in Jefferson because that had been Addie’s only request. Seemingly, all of the children agree to travel to Jefferson in order to fulfill their mother’s wish. However, each family member—with the exception of Jewel—reveals his or her own reasons for going into town. For example, Anse admits that he wants a new set of teeth. Cash wants to display his carpentry work and look for a gramophone. Although not directly, Dewey Dell reveals that she is pregnant and wants an abortion, and the youngest, Vardaman, wants a toy train. While he does not have a materialistic desire, Darl travels to Jefferson in order to keep track of his family’s actions and to make sure his mother gets her burial. Throughout their journey, the Bundrens face multiple obstacles. For example, Vardaman, who does not fully comprehend his mother’s death, drills into Addie’s face while trying to create air holes in the coffin so that the corpse can “breathe.” Also, when the family discovers that a bridge has collapsed, they ford a river, dragging Addie’s coffin under water. Cash breaks his leg while trying to rescue the coffin. Then, when the family stops at Gillespie’s, a local farm, the barn burns down—almost destroying the coffin. Although the family seems to work together in its struggle to get Addie to Jefferson, each family member works to fulfill his or her own desires. For instance, the Bundrens could have spent the evening at a neighbor’s home instead of dragging Addie’s coffin through the river. Also, Cash reveals that he jumps into the river not only to rescue the coffin, but also to retrieve his carpentry tools. Later, Anse sells Jewel’s beloved horse in order to buy a new team of mules. Even Addie speaks from the coffin to reveal her selfishness. She admits to having an extramarital affair with the local preacher, who is Jewel’s biologi-
cal father. Further, Addie admits that she wants to be buried in Jefferson because she wants to spend eternity as far away from the Bundrens as possible. Throughout the expedition, Darl—the son whom most people refer to as “queer” because of his alleged telepathic ability—is the only Bundren who questions the family’s motives. After eight days, Darl tires of the spectacle of dragging his mother’s corpse through the county and sets fire to Gillespie’s barn in an attempt to burn the coffin and Addie’s putrefied body. Out of respect for his mother and a belief that she should have been buried earlier, Darl tries to burn the coffin in one of the most selfless acts in the novel. Ironically, the rest of the Bundren family deems Darl insane and has workers from a sanitarium take him away from the middle of town shortly after Addie’s burial. After facing the difficulties of the journey to Jefferson, the Bundrens remain unified at the end of the novel. When Anse gets his new teeth, he immediately remarries and introduces his children to the new Mrs. Bundren. Perhaps from their own understanding of selfishness, the children are able to accept their father’s actions. Through the Bundrens in As I Lay Dying, Faulkner explores the complexities of human beings and their relationships with one another and demonstrates that each member of a family is, after all, only human. HanaRae Dudek
Grief in As I Lay Dying
Within the confines of the narrative in As I Lay Dying, grief clouds the day to day existence at the Bundren household. While Addie Bundren lies on her deathbed, her children and husband negotiate their way through her imminent but uncertain death, the urgency to prepare a coffin for her, arranging for her burial far away in another town, as Addie so desires, and the need for the family to not let go of the opportunity to earn a few more dollars. Life among the southern American poor must be lived on a daily basis. Faulkner accords grief a palpable presence in the novella. We share the burden of grief that envelops the Bundrens as well as those it touches incidentally, such as the neighbors. Faulkner also allows us a glimpse into the minds of characters through a
Light in Augustâ•…â•… 425 series of monologues, which is the narrative strategy of the novella. The Bundrens articulate their anguish, which arises from a death in the family as much as from life’s larger context in which death is only one of life’s many preoccupations. Faulkner’s remarkable plotting lets us discover their secret sorrows—as opposed to their public distress couched in the death of a mother and wife—after we have fully absorbed their settled grief resulting from Addie’s death and the family’s struggle to reach Jefferson for her burial in extremely inclement weather that thwarts their intentions in more ways than one. As seen in Cash’s painful injuries, his father’s thoughtless handling of his son’s predicament, Dewey Dell’s unwanted pregnancy, her seduction, her struggle to secure an abortion and Jewel’s sense of betrayal when his father deprives him of his beloved horse he had bought with money earned through hard labor, Darl’s descent into insanity and his incarceration for arson, the local minister Whitfield’s battle with his conscience to confess his adulterous relationship with Addie and the fact of Jewel being their bastard son—grief is a factor in their lives, generally and individually. As they confront their grief and deal with their grief-stricken lives, the Bundrens may appear passive and helpless. But they establish an inescapable truth of the human condition when they accept that life must go on. If their grief appears to have no sting, that is how it appears on the surface. Their sorrows are, much like uninvited guests, both a distressing burden as well as an unavoidable component of existence. However sharply and richly drawn they strike the readers, the characters in As I Lay Dying draw their vivid fashioning from belonging to a group. Even though Anse and his children form a family, they act more like Thomas Hardy’s rustics, motivated by common desires and a common code of life and living. Often reminiscent of the humorous dimensions in Hardy’s rustics, the Bundrens’ tragic drama is played out in comic terms. Addie had been laid in her coffin “head to foot so it won’t crush her dress. It was her wedding dress and it had a flare-out bottom, and they had laid her head to foot in it so the dress could be spread out, . . .” No conflicts mar their homogeneity as a family and a group. They
seem bound to stay committed to each other. The neighbors and others who are close to them must participate, as members of the community, in such common occurrences of life as Addie’s death and Sunday rituals. Such being the case, Faulkner’s treatment of grief takes the form of a living rendering of the fate of a community rather than a scrutiny of the griefstricken heart of an individual. “Doom” and “defeat” are words often used to describe Faulkner’s characters. As Ralph Waldo Emerson said in another context, “There are people who have an appetite for grief.” But the Bundrens counter grief with strategies of survival as well as their ability to withstand pressure. Above all, they endure. Addie’s monologue points to deeper meanings in human existence and suggests a pragmatic view of life. Life is important. Living is important. Whether one lives in joy or in sorrow is of little consequence. Addie breaks open the cocoon of inherited familiarities when she says: “One day I was talking to Cora. She prayed for me because she believed I was blind to sin, wanting me to kneel and pray too, because to people to whom sin is just a matter of words, to them salvation is words too.” She thus offers testimony to the truth of her father’s words—“. . . the reason for living was to get ready to stay dead for a long time” —as well as to the inevitability of grief and anguish as the defining values of human existence. Gulshan Taneja
Faulkner, Williamâ•… Light in Augustâ•… (1932) At the center of William Faulkner’s novel Light in August is the story of Joe Christmas. He is a loner who knows he is part-black and part-white, but cannot identify with either of the racially divided communities. The novel traces Christmas’s life, from his time as a young child in an orphanage to when he is adopted by a cold, Christian man and his feebleminded wife, to his arrival in Jefferson, Mississippi. He works in a sawmill there before quitting to sell moonshine. Eventually he is accused by the town of murdering a white woman, Joanna Burden. Intertwined with Christmas’s story is Lena Grove’s story. The two characters never meet, but are
426â•…â•… Faulkner, William connected by their relationship with other characters in the book, including Byron Bunch, Joe Brown, and the Reverend Gail Hightower. Lena is a poor young girl who is pregnant and intent on finding the father of her child—a man whom she calls Lucas Burch but everyone else knows as Joe Brown. Lena, who has nothing but her baby, serves as a foil to Christmas’s repudiation of the community. She is repudiated by some members in the community for being an unwed mother, but embraced by others because of her needy situation. Faulkner explains that Lena represents “the basic possibility for happiness and goodness.” Light in August can be read as a powerful commentary on race and racial matters in the United States, particularly in the Deep South in the 1930s. Religion functions in the book as an elitist set of principles, meant to exclude people like Christmas. Christmas and Lena are each examples of the individual who moves through a society that judges and spurns them. Society, in Light in August, functions as a gossiping mob, rejecting those who do not conform to its standards of propriety or respectability. Elizabeth Cornell
Individual and Society in Light in August
“Man knows so little about his fellows” observes the unnamed narrator in William Faulkner’s Light in August. This line seems to summarize what is true throughout the novel: Neither the community of Jefferson nor the book’s major characters who move on the community’s margins know much about each other. Everyone depends upon gossip to speculate why anyone acts or speaks in a particular way. Unless individuals conform to certain norms and values, they may be judged or condemned by society, rather than supported and empowered by it. The lack of open, honest communication between the individual and society often has negative results. Perhaps the character in the book most condemned by society is Joe Christmas. His mother dies in childbirth and from that point he moves through the world as an individual without home, family, or community, living on the fringes of society. Faulkner describes Joe as “a phantom, a spirit, straight out of its own world, and lost.” Although
Christmas passes as a white man, his mixed racial background causes him to feel disconnected from society. He lives on the outskirts of Jefferson and rarely interacts with the community; the townspeople can only speculate about his private life. His repudiation of society works against him most clearly when Joanna Burden is murdered. Although they have no concrete evidence, the townspeople conjecture that only a black person could commit such a grisly crime. When Joe Brown comes forward and accuses Christmas of the murder and supports his accusation by revealing that Christmas is part-black, the town quickly convinces itself of Christmas’s guilt: “↜‘He don’t look any more like a nigger than I do,’↜” says one townsperson. “↜‘But it must have been the nigger blood in him’↜” that made him commit such an awful crime. No one knows for sure if Christmas murdered Joanna, but they need a murderer. Christmas—a man who has shunned their society—perfectly fits their profile. Like Christmas, Joanna Burden lives on the outskirts of Jefferson. She associates not with the respectable white folks in town, but with black families who live nearby. The town regards her with “astonishment and outrage,” and will never “forgive her and let her be dead in peace and quiet.” Further, her death provides the townspeople with “an emotional barbecue, a Roman holiday” in which they can gossip about her private life and speculate about the “Negro” they believe ravished her before killing her. The town thinks she deserved to die this way because of her sympathetic dealings with black people. Nonetheless, because she is a white woman, her murder must be avenged. It is an excuse for the town to form a posse and find a suitable black suspect. The Reverend Gail Hightower is also shunned and gossiped about by Jefferson society. He is burdened and obsessed by his family’s Confederate past, which contributes to his alienation from society. Hightower’s single friend, Byron Bunch, manages to glean from the townspeople details about the minister’s complex past. Hightower arrived in Jefferson with his wife years ago, but his wife started acting strangely and later killed herself at a Memphis hotel. The town blames Hightower for these events, even though no one knows the true story. The town believes he caused his wife to “go bad” and that he
Light in Augustâ•…â•… 427 “was not a natural husband, a natural man.” Byron recognizes the insidiousness of this small-town gossip, where an “idea, a single idle word blown from mind to mind” can be driven out of proportion. Hightower refuses to leave Jefferson after his wife’s death because the family ghosts reside in Jefferson; the burden of the past is too strong. He lives alone, spurning the town just as the town spurns him. It is only when he delivers Lena Grove’s baby, and tries to protect Joe Christmas from the angry mob, that he can heal his troubled relationship with the past and, in effect, feel comfortable about his place in society. Lena Grove seems to be a counterbalance to all the loners who populate this novel. Lena is unwed, poor, pregnant, without family or permanent home. Gossip about her situation follows in her wake wherever she goes. But Lena carries tremendous faith that everything will work out. She accepts her situation without struggling against it, and can journey through southern towns thanks to the “folks taking good care of her.” Society, as this novel shows, can be cruel and heartless, particularly toward individuals who do not conform. But, as seen with Lena, that is not entirely true. Ultimately, the human heart has enough compassion so that society will not destroy itself. Faulkner puts it best in his 1951 Nobel Prize speech: “I believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail. He is immortal . . . because he has a soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and endurance.” Elizabeth Cornell
Race in Light in August
Perhaps no subject in American culture is more controversial than race. Throughout his work, William Faulkner examines how race divides individuals, families, and entire communities. Light in August is no exception. At the center of this story is the shadowy figure of Joe Christmas, whose mother was white and father most likely black. The dietitian at the orphanage where he lives until he is five years old makes him aware of how being part-black can be used against him by people in power. It is there that he learns the importance of concealing this part of himself. As an adult, Joe shifts between white and black worlds, failing to find comfort in either
one. When he briefly lives in a black community in Chicago, he shuns whites and attempts to become fully “Negro,” “trying to breathe into himself ” their essence, “the dark and inscrutable thinking and being” of black people, but fails. One of the tragedies about Joe Christmas is that it is impossible for him to be either all black or all white; he is both, in a society that refuses to accept someone who is not “pure.” Prejudice and racism against those who are different prevent people from accepting Joe. Part of the problem are the negative and untruthful stereotypes that white people perpetuate against blacks, such as laziness and dishonesty. Joe Brown insists that the only black people who work hard must be slaves. But Christmas disproves the stereotype: He works hard and solidly, first on his adoptive father’s farm, then at the mill in Jefferson. Later, he develops a successful business selling moonshine. He is no more dishonest for selling the illegal liquor than the upright white fathers and brothers who buy it from him. In fact, Brown, who is white, more clearly fulfills the negative stereotypes about blacks than Christmas. When Brown quits the job at the mill for the easier and more lucrative job of selling moonshine for Christmas, he is seen around town “idle, destinationless, and constant . . . lolling behind the wheel” of a new car. Faulkner’s intent here, which can be found throughout his body of work, is to confront the white hypocrisy embedded in negative stereotypes of blacks. Joe Brown’s repeated assertion of his whiteness after the murder of Joanna Burden is a good example of how important it is to be white in this southern community. The townspeople believe only a black man is capable of such a grisly murder; their sense of community is linked in part by this accusation and their shared racism and prejudice. Hightower puts the situation best when he learns Joe Christmas has “negro blood” and is accused of the crime: “Think Byron; what it will mean when the people—if they catch . . . Poor man. Poor mankind.” Hightower knows that, if given the chance, some people would lynch Christmas. Hightower’s statement no doubt refers to white supremacists like Percy Grimm. Grimm, under the pretense of protecting America and the white race,
428â•…â•… Faulkner, William organizes a group of men to be ready for action should such an opportunity occur to lynch Christmas. The opportunity does arise when Christmas escapes from prison and Grimm chases after him on a bicycle. Grimm tracks him to Hightower’s house where Christmas takes refuge. In this grisly scene, Grimm castrates and then murders Christmas. Faulkner’s liberal use of the words “Negro” and “nigger” in his work has caused some readers to label him a racist, or at least consider the possibility. Most Faulkner scholars disagree with this assessment. These words were commonly used in the United States in the early 20th century. “Nigger” was used pejoratively by some whites to refer to blacks, and “Negro” was commonly used by blacks and whites. If Faulkner had written Light in August without using these words, some of the book’s power might have been diminished. Moreover, it is important to separate the author from his work. In the 1950s, when the Civil Rights movement began, Faulkner was outspoken in his support of a move away from segregation and supported equal rights for black people. Although he received much criticism in the South for this position, even from his own family and friends, he maintained this position until his death in 1962. Works such as Light in August are a testament to his belief that racism and prejudice are not only wrong but also a detriment to society. Elizabeth Cornell
Religion in Light in August
In William Faulkner’s novel, Light in August, the use and abuse of the Christian religion is a significant theme. Simon McEachern and Joanna Burden are two characters who rely on biblical texts and Christian orthodoxy to justify their hypocritical views and destructive behavior. In various ways, they believe a God-given knowledge exists “out there,” independent of human thought or invention. Only certain, chosen people are privy to this knowledge, a knowledge that often gives them the sense they are superior to everyone else. Joe Christmas is one whom the chosen consider to be among the unchosen. Simon McEachern uses religion as an excuse for abusing another human being. When he adopts Christmas, he vows to raise him to “grow up to fear God and abhor idleness and vanity despite his ori-
gin.” McEachern’s disdain for Christmas’s origin— that is, a child likely conceived in sin rather than in a marriage bed (he does not know about Christmas’s racial background)—indicates his view that Christmas is not, unlike himself, among God’s chosen. It is because of McEachern that Christmas’s distaste for religion develops early on, and he refuses to learn the Presbyterian catechism that McEachern forces upon him. In response, McEachern whips Christmas and deprives him of food, using religion as justification for this abuse. Later, McEachern uses religion as his justification to condemn Christmas’s act of dating the waitress, Bobbie. When McEachern discovers them together at a dance, he perceives himself as “just and rocklike” and as an “actual representative of the wrathful and retributive Throne” before he attacks Christmas. But Christmas sees only the “face of Satan” and kills McEachern with a chair. Like McEachern, Joanna Burden believes she is among the chosen to interpret God’s word and share it with others such as Joe Christmas. But long before the crucial moment when Joanna asks Christmas to kneel and pray with her, the two have carried on a passionate, animal-like love affair. Christmas has awakened the sexual appetite of a starved woman described as a “New England glacier exposed suddenly to the fire of the New England biblical hell.” The pleasure she experiences with Christmas seems to be as much derived from her knowledge that he is a black man (miscegenation is taboo) as the idea of her living “not alone in sin but in filth” too. Joanna’s gleeful rejection of religion exposes how deeply repressive religious beliefs can be on basic human desires. The relationship, however, quickly becomes one in which Christmas feels Joanna is attempting to dominate him. She offers to send him to law school for blacks and insists on bearing his child; Christmas refuses to comply. He does not want her to determine the course of his life. Her sense of superiority over him is most concretely exposed when, after the passion in the relationship is nearly extinct, she asks Christmas to kneel with her and pray: “↜‘It is not I who ask it. Kneel with me.’↜” Her statement implies her belief that she has a direct connection with God and he does not. Christmas does not believe in this bond, and refuses to pray with her, even when she
“A Rose for Emily”â•…â•… 429 points an old revolver at him. Once again, because of an individual acting upon an elitist interpretation of Christian belief, Christmas believes he has no choice but to kill. Joe Christmas has no use for the so-called Godgiven spiritual knowledge possessed by many characters in this book, in part because this is the religion of white people, and he does not feel a part of this group. The serious and troubled conflict about who he is and what he is aligns him with Christian martyrs, ascetics, and Christ himself. Indeed, contrary to what McEachern and Burden believe, understanding God and being a spiritual being is no easy task. The path to enlightenment is difficult and treacherous and the journey itself may be as important as the goal. This difficult journey makes us human. Christmas’s struggle in a world bent on destroying him humanizes him in a way that Christ’s struggles in a hostile world put a human face on Christianity. McEachern and Burden’s elitist, inhuman brand of Christianity is the kind that hurts and destroys others as well as themselves—precisely not the kind taught by Christ. Elizabeth Cornell
Faulkner, Williamâ•… “A Rose for Emily”â•… (1930, 1931)
“A Rose for Emily,” first published in the April 1930 issue of Forum magazine, may be William Faulkner’s most widely read short story. A slightly amended version was published in These 13 (1931) and later in Collected Stories (1950). The story has received critical attention because of the ways in which it highlights several recurrent themes that appear in Faulkner’s longer works (such as repressed sexuality, loss and grief, and commentary on social class). Faulkner presents the story in five non-linear sections and employs an unnamed, first-person plural narrator to relay the details of Miss Emily GrierÂ� son’s life. The short story contrasts Miss Emily’s early life of social privilege against her later life of alienation and financial struggles following the death of her repressive father and the sudden loss of her romantic partner. Faulkner explores the standards of social customs through the telling of several different scenes, such as the town leaders’ attempts
to save Miss Emily embarrassment over unpaid taxes or the stench of her property. Most important, the narration explores the consequences of Miss Emily’s unorthodox relationship with the lowerclass Homer Barron and the subsequent town gossip it incites. Despite the foreshadowing of a gothic ending, it is not until Miss Emily’s death and the townspeople’s exploration of her previously shut-up home that the gruesome facts of Miss Emily’s life become apparent. Miss Emily poisoned Homer Barron years earlier and had since been sleeping next to the disintegrating corpse in what would have been their marriage bed. The narrative makes important comments about the literary themes of death, alienation, community, social class, and gender. Jennifer Smith
Death in “A Rose for Emily”
Within this short work, Faulkner presents compelling, but occasionally contradictory, views of death. In this tale, death functions as a process that not only can provide moments of clarity and revelation but also can yield more unresolved questions than answers. Faulkner bookends the tale of Miss Emily’s life with a narration surrounding the scene of her death and, in doing so, suggests the very important role that this phenomenon plays in how we come to know and understand this character. The tale starts with the narrative of the moments following Miss Emily’s death. The town has remained fascinated by Miss Emily throughout her life, and only upon her death are the townspeople able to begin to satisfy some of their curiosity about the woman who held such a respected place in Jefferson County for the better half of a century. Miss Emily’s death breaks the societal spell that she held over the town in her life, and permits the townspeople to begin to illuminate the puzzle of her later years. Death becomes a moment of revelation. Indeed, it is only upon Miss Emily’s death and the subsequent exploration of her previously unseen living quarters that the townspeople are able to understand fully the truly grotesque nature of her later life. Yet despite this level of exposure that her passing engenders, Miss Emily’s death also brings forth even greater questions about her life.
430â•…â•… Faulkner, William Faulkner marks the major milestones in Miss Emily’s life by the death of men important to her—first the death of her father and then the death of Homer Barron. Many might herald the death of Miss Emily’s father, a man who repressed Miss Emily for most of her childhood and young adult life, as a welcome relief from the tyranny of her father’s house. Yet this is not the case for Miss Emily. Miss Emily is instead in a perpetual state of delusion regarding the very real instances of death that surround her. The day after her father’s death, Miss Emily does not register any signs of grief on her face, and, upon the arrival of townswomen bringing condolences to the house, Miss Emily denies the fact that her father has died at all. She continues this denial for three days until she finally allows the burial of the body—under the threat of legal actions. Miss Emily’s actions upon this first major death in her life suggest the danger of remaining stuck in this first stage of grief for an extended period, and foreshadow the irrational approach that Miss Emily takes toward her later relationship with Homer Barron. Miss Emily, denied so many of the human connections that life offers, is unwilling or unable to function in terms of everyday society. Of course, the scene that most memorably preÂ� sents the phenomenon of death and our varied reactions to it is the one centered on Homer Barron’s gruesome disappearance. The moment of revelation comes when we find, along with the townspeople, the long-deceased body of Homer Barron that lies in Miss Emily’s wedding bed, assembled in a posture of affection. The plot of the text finally comes together as we realize that Miss Emily likely poisoned Homer and has since lain with the dead body as though every night was their wedding night. Yet this instance of death brings forth so many more questions than it answers, not least of which is the question of why Miss Emily decided to kill Homer Barron at all. Why would Miss Emily, so unwilling to accept the death of her father, the only man previously in her life, prematurely take the life of a man she loved? Death functions within this tale in several different ways. It iterates the human preoccupation we have with denying death at all costs, even in the face of inescapable evidence. The assembled scenes also
highlight the many questions that we have about death, life, and the inner workings of an individual mind. Many readers find the gothic scene Faulkner creates here to be incomprehensible in several ways, especially concerning what it might suggest about human life and death. Yet Faulkner’s tale also reveals much about the ways in which we are fascinated by the cycle of life and our responses to it, and makes interesting commentary about the complex role that death plays in how we understand life and each other. Jennifer Smith
Social Class in “A Rose for Emily”
“A Rose for Emily” highlights the ways in which human beings function in socially stratified communities, commenting on the social mores that class depends upon as well as the psychological and sociological consequences such hierarchies inspire. Though many highlight the individual psychological dementia of Miss Emily as the generative force behind Faulkner’s dismal ending, failure to consider the social implications of this ending leads only to a very flat understanding of the tale. The plural narrator establishes Miss Emily at the outset of the tale to be a figure of social esteem within the community of Jefferson. Indeed, in the first line, the narrator refers to the late Miss Emily as a “fallen monument”—a term that well describes the role that she fulfilled in this stratified society. Yet Faulkner does not just rest in establishing the different social classes that exist in Jefferson; he also makes artful commentary on the ways that such societal standards come into play through the hopes and feelings that inhabitants of a given community might have toward one another. Miss Emily is one of the last holdouts of a gentrified society—and the narrator constantly remarks upon this fact through his characterizations of her. Upon Miss Emily’s entrance into a room, men rise. The town leaders hold special tax meetings in order to discuss Miss Emily’s unique case, and, ultimately, make an exception to customarily rigid tax laws for the sake of Miss Emily’s honor. Honorable men of the town prowl about like burglars outside of her house, sprinkling lime rather than risking the embarrassment of having to suggest to Miss Emily that her property stinks. It is clear that Miss Emily
The Sound and the Furyâ•…â•… 431 holds a special standard in the town of Jefferson. Yet what responses does this situation invoke? Social class comes into play frequently in the reactions that Miss Emily’s misfortunes inspire in the community. As Miss Emily continues to age and does not settle down with a husband in her early adult life, the townsfolk express a general feeling of vindication; while they are not exactly happy, they are comforted in their belief that Miss Emily and her family had tried to hold themselves too far above the average man. One can imagine that, had Miss Emily been a poverty-stricken unfortunate when her father died, and had since remained unmarried, the town’s general reaction to her situation might have included more empathetic responses. As the narrative progresses, the townspeople come to regard Miss Emily with a seemingly deeper pity, and though they worry over her, they seem resigned to Miss Emily’s fate as a lonely, unmarried woman. It may be a shock, for the reader to comprehend that when Miss Emily does seem to find happiness in her relationship with Homer Barron, the class differences between the two incite even more gossip among the townspeople. Because of the place that Miss Emily’s family once held in the socially divided society, she seems forever relegated to the outskirts of that community, and purposefully excluded from the general society of her fellow townspeople. Another aspect that one must consider when thinking about social class in this tale is that of the context in which Faulkner was writing. Faulkner comments on the ideals of a deeply stratified southern society throughout the tale, and points the reader to the potentially negative effects this degree of stratification inspires. The close of the tale reveals Miss Emily’s necrophilia, and, at the same time, points an accusing finger at the townspeople for committing the same metaphorical crime. Unable to live in the present moment, the town, like Miss Emily, continually dallies with a past that is long over but still haunts the communal mind-set. Miss Emily’s family dates back to a prior generation of community members who upheld much different standards about power structures in society—a generation well versed in the expectations of antebellum America. The community members of Jefferson
County who remain fascinated with Miss Emily are also transfixed by an image of a society divided. Jefferson County may have long ago abolished slavery, but the habits and mentality that such a divisive practice instilled in its inhabitants remain very well entrenched. To attempt to understand “A Rose for Emily” without accounting for the varied and significant ways in which social matters influence the text is to take an overly simplistic approach to the work. In this tale, Faulkner makes some not-so-subtle comments on the dangerously pervasive ways in which social roles can divide communities. Exploring representations of social standards in Jefferson County helps us to understand better Miss Emily’s character, the reasons behind her questionable actions, and the responses that these events provoke. Jennifer Smith
Faulkner, Williamâ•… The Sound and the Furyâ•… (1929)
William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury began as a short story centered around some children who are sent away from their grandmother’s funeral to protect them from the sight of grieving adults. After Faulkner wrote the story, he became interested in the relationship of a “truly innocent” child to the world. That child became Benjy Compson, a mentally handicapped 33-year-old man who narrates the first section of the book. Faulkner recognized, however, that the erratic time shifts in Benjy’s section made the story difficult to understand, so he wrote three more sections, each time retelling the story in an attempt to make it clearer. What emerged was a novel about the sibling love and lost innocence within the relationships between Caddy Compson and her three brothers, Quentin, Jason, and Benjy. The book is also about the slow decline of the Compsons, a family that has seen its reputation and finances fall upon hard times amid the dying traditions of the old South. Each of the three sections is narrated by a different brother, who provides his perspective of this story. In the last section, the story is told by an unidentified narrator and features a detailed portrait of the family’s loyal black servant, Dilsey Gibson.
432â•…â•… Faulkner, William Faulkner, who won the 1949 Nobel Prize for his literary achievements, considered his masterpiece a “splendid failure” because he felt he never got the story right. Readers, however, know otherwise. Although The Sound and the Fury can be challenging, especially to first-time readers, its themes and style are quintessentially American and modern. The book’s influence on writers has been far-reaching since it was first published in 1929. Elizabeth Cornell
Grief in The Sound and the Fury
After Caddy Compson is exiled from the Compson household, the doomed family of William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury must cope with the loss of their only daughter. The mentally handicapped Benjy has essentially lost the one family member (besides their servant, Dilsey) who expresses love for him. Although his vivid memories of his sister Caddy give him the impression that her loving presence still exists, whenever he is thrust back into the present his grief over her absence is painfully rehabilitated. His brother Jason’s grief takes the form of bitterness and vengeance. Caddy’s divorce prevented Jason from getting a job with her husband in a bank, and he is now responsible for her daughter. Jason’s theft of the money she sends to support her daughter is a form of revenge against Caddy, but the money he takes may also be seen as compensation for the loss of his sister. Although Jason’s pilfering may be partly to blame for the unruly behavior exhibited by Caddy’s daughter, Quentin, her rebellion is also an angry response of grief over her mother’s absence from her childhood. Finally, since Caddy never presents her side of the story, readers experience a kind of loss of her as well. Like Miss Quentin, we are mainly left to speculate about her, gathering what little we can from the subjective viewpoints of others. One such viewpoint belongs to Caddy’s brother, Quentin. He cannot believe that he will one day recover from the hurt he feels. That hurt is caused by Caddy’s lost virginity and marriage, and Quentin knows the passage of time will make this pain fade. Thus, he is obsessed with time from the moment he awakens each day. Quentin breaks his pocket watch in an attempt to stop time, as if to prevent
his cherished memories of Caddy from fading and thus leading to the diminishment of his grief and hurt. But Quentin’s handless watch keeps ticking; the changing sunlight, his persistent shadow, and the hourly church bells are other reminders of passing time. He realizes time cannot be escaped, prevented from passing, or reversed. Quentin’s loss is such that he cannot visualize a future in which he might be reunited with his sister or even transcend his deep grief. Taking his life is the only way Quentin can imagine stopping time and keeping his grief intact. Although Caddy is certainly his greatest loss, Benjy undergoes other significant experiences of loss. He loses his field next door when the Compsons sell it to developers for a golf course so Quentin can go to Harvard. One consequence is that he must suffer the experience of hearing the word caddy throughout the day, reminding him anew of his grief over Caddy’s absence. His testicles are another loss—removed after he chased a neighbor girl, who he believed was Caddy. Mrs. Compson changes his name from Maury to Benjamin, a name that means “son of my sorrow,” because she considers his condition “a judgment” on her. Benjy’s bellowing, which disturbs every character in the book, is a potent expression of grief for everything he and each Compson has lost. No one feels more persecuted by those losses than Mrs. Compson. She wonders what she has done to deserve a mentally challenged son, a selfish daughter, a son who kills himself, an unruly granddaughter, and a husband who drinks himself to death. Only Jason, she claims, has never given her “one moment’s sorrow,” although Jason has done many things behind her back that would give her grief. When Miss Quentin disappears, Mrs. Compson leaps to the conclusion that her granddaughter has also committed suicide. She seems to thrive on these occurrences of loss, and blames them for her sickly, confined life. Rather than grieve for her losses and set an example of strength by moving forward in spite of everything, Mrs. Compson takes to her bed as if nothing more can be done but wait for the next round of loss and grief. With such an oppressive atmosphere of loss and unresolved grief surrounding the Compson household, there seems little hope of anyone thriv-
The Sound and the Furyâ•…â•… 433 ing there. No wonder Caddy and her daughter must each seek their escape, and as far from Jefferson as possible. No wonder Quentin must take his own life. Of all the characters, only Dilsey, the family’s servant, seems to have coping tools. When she cries during the Easter service, her tears feel like a natural and much needed release. When Dilsey says “I seed de first and de last,” she indicates her ability to hope, to have courage and love, and endure in a world filled with constant and pervasive loss. Elizabeth Cornell
Love in The Sound and the Fury
Love is a powerful and destructive force that threads through William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury. One focus of love in the novel is Caddy Compson. Her brother, Benjy, is frequently flooded with memories of his exiled sister. He remembers that, of all the Compsons, Caddy conveyed the most compassion, understanding, and love for him during his childhood. He depended on her gentle care and words: “You’ve got your Caddy” she often reassured him. Unlike the rest of the family, Caddy enjoyed playing with him and taking care of him. For example, she made sure he wore gloves on a cold day. Yet even with his limited mental faculties, Benjy could sense when Caddy’s love for him was threatened. He cried at the sight of her muddy drawers, which may be read as representing her developing sexuality. Later, he became upset at the smell of her perfume, which can be understood as representing the loss of her virginity. At Caddy’s wedding, he bellowed at the sight of her veil. In each instance, Caddy was there to comfort him. Following her exile, however, in the present time of the book, Benjy is left only with memories of her. Thus, whenever he hears the word “caddy” echoing from the golf course next door, it reminds him of her and causes him to bellow. Since Caddy is no longer there to soothe him, his consolation comes in substitute love objects, such as a slipper or a flower. Benjy’s obsession over his absent sister’s love becomes a destructive force in his life because he is unable to accept solace or love from anyone else, even from the family’s compassionate and loving servant, Dilsey. Quentin’s love for his sister is no less deep than Benjy’s, but more conflicted and complex. Quentin
cannot bear that his sister might love anyone but him, and his chivalric attempts to defend her honor fail. Thus, the loss of her virginity, and her later marriage to Herbert, whom Quentin knows she marries only because she is pregnant by another man, affect him deeply. He loves Caddy so much that he wishes the “world would roar away” and leave them alone together. At one point, Quentin pretends he has committed incest with her, but his father knows he is lying. Quentin cannot bear, as his father points out, to think that someday his memories of Caddy will fade and that his love for her might ebb. The keen pain Quentin feels about his sister’s circumstances keeps his love and memories fresh. But Quentin knows his father’s words bear truth. Suicide is the only way Quentin can stop time and prevent his love for her from diminishing, as well as escape the guilt from his incestuous feelings toward her. Jason, whom Faulkner considered his most evil character, is clearly not Caddy’s most loving brother. Jason’s bitterness over Caddy’s absence is taken out on her teen-aged daughter, Quentin, for whom he is responsible. Each month, Jason brings his mother a fake copy of the check Caddy sends to support Quentin, which Mrs. Compson burns. Jason secretly cashes the check and keeps the money. Caddy’s money functions as a substitute for the love she has withheld from him. Jason’s actions also attempt to deprive Caddy of her daughter’s love, just as Caddy deprived him. By leading his niece, Quentin, to think she is supported by him, Jason believes he is entitled to her loyalty and obedience, if not her love. But Jason’s selfish, vindictive behavior ultimately backfires, causing Quentin to despise him and run away with the stolen money. However, love is not an entirely destructive force in the novel. Dilsey, the Compson family’s loving and tireless servant, offers unconditional love that functions like a glue that holds the fragmented family together. She makes sure Benjy receives a cake on his birthday. She defends Quentin from her Uncle Jason’s anger. Although Dilsey is old, she runs up and down the stairs at Mrs. Compson’s every whim. But even Dilsey’s love has not prevented Caddy’s downfall or exile, nor will it save the rest of the Compsons. In the book’s final section, when Dilsey says she has seen the “beginnin” and that now she sees the
434â•…â•… Faulkner, William “endin,” she indicates, in part, that love, including the love she bears for her family as well as the Compsons, cannot keep things from growing worse. Love is a word rarely mentioned in Faulkner’s novel, perhaps because, like Caddy, it is often absent. Dilsey seems to be one of the few characters in the novel who knows how to give compassion and love. But eventually she will die, and mainly people like Jason, who are selfish and self-serving, will remain to carry on in a modern world that seems emptied of people who truly care for others. Elizabeth Cornell
Tradition in The Sound and the Fury
In William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury, the Compsons have embodied genteel southern traditions since before the American Civil War. Yet these traditions are eroding in the early 20th century, and Quentin Compson is particularly sensitive to this. Like many southern families, the Compsons follow the tradition of sending their eldest son north to Harvard University. His mother’s proud words, “Harvard my Harvard boy Harvard,” echo in Quentin’s head, but he knows he will never feel like one of the “old sons of Harvard.” In part because he understands that Harvard’s reputation for cultivating moral young men is nearly a thing of the past. For example, Quentin knows that Herbert Head, who marries Caddy, cheated on examinations while at Harvard. Quentin is also invested in the traditional male role of defending female honor. When he encounters a lost little girl, Maria, during his ramble in Boston, he feels responsible for helping her find the way home. They eventually stumble upon her brother, but the man assumes Quentin means to harm Maria, so he punches Quentin in the face. This scene reinforces Quentin’s larger failure in chivalry to defend the honor of his sister. He loves Caddy so much, he cannot stand to think of her being with any man. Quentin’s love, however, cannot prevent her from shirking the tradition that she save her virginity until marriage. Nor can he prevent her out-of-wedlock pregnancy, which threatens her family’s respected reputation as well as her own. Quentin commits suicide partly because he knows the standards for the traditions he values can no longer be upheld.
Jason, Quentin’s brother, has a conflicted relationship with tradition. As the eldest male Compson, Jason feels entitled to the traditional role of household head but shows little sympathy for his family. He is offended by the tradition-bucking behavior of his niece and resents having to be responsible for her and his “slobbering” retarded brother. Money, not family, seems most important to Jason. He adheres to the New South’s mentality that money “just belongs to the man that can get it and keep it.” Yet Jason’s embrace of the New South’s values over traditional ones is his downfall. He no longer owns part of the hardware store where he works, and he gambles on cotton futures rather than following the tradition of saving or reinvesting in his business. Having spurned the traditional support network of family, Jason is impoverished both socially and financially. Also possessing a strong sense of dying traditions is Luster, the young black man who takes care of Benjy. Southern society was traditionally composed of a patriarchal ruling class and a class of people who were ruled, such as slaves and later servants. Luster’s grandfather, Roskus, was a servant (and possibly born a slave) for his entire life. Unlike his grandfather, Luster appears to have no interest in continuing his family’s tradition of servitude. He desires his independence, and knows he can achieve this with money, which traditionally was rarely available to blacks. His ardent quest for his lost quarter represents an obsession with money that seems equaled only by Jason’s. Luster’s attempt to sell golf balls back to golfers suggests the industriousness he will need to move ahead in society and leave the old servant tradition behind. The “stiff new straw hat” Luster wears to church indicates his upwardly mobile aspirations in a world where old traditions no longer apply. The novel’s structure and style must also be considered in this discussion of tradition. The book’s fractured plot and frequent time shifts, which make it difficult to understand during initial readings, distinguish the novel as modernist. Faulkner’s narrative style represents a break with the traditional novel form: There is little linear story progression or even a clear beginning and ending. The novel is not told by a traditional, omniscient narrator or from
Tom Jonesâ•…â•… 435 the perspective of one or two characters. Rather, the reader must untangle a narrative presented by four narrators, each with a unique, limited viewpoint. Quentin’s interior monologue, with its stream-ofconsciousness ramblings and time shifts, reflects the chaos and uncertainty he encounters in a world where order and tradition, which gave life meaning and significance, seem to have evaporated. The theme of the demise of tradition in the Old South undergirds Faulkner’s novel. For Quentin and Jason, this loss means a disappearance of traditional family and community values. For Luster, it means the chance to lead a better life than his forebears, and perhaps the opportunity to establish new traditions. The Sound and the Fury illustrates, in plot and in its narrative style, that old practices are inevitably replaced—whether those changes are welcome or not. Elizabeth Cornell
Fielding, Henryâ•… Tom Jonesâ•… (1749)
Tom Jones, seldom called by its full name, The History of Tom Jones, A Foundling, is one of the earliest examples of the English novel. Its realistic style and foregrounding of specific times and places sets it, as well as contemporaneous novels such as Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and Moll Flanders, Behn’s Oroonoko, and Richardson’s Clarissa, apart from the romances and prose poems that came before them. The novel was a new way of looking at the world that emphasized realism and experience in an unprecedented way. Divided into 18 smaller books, Tom Jones begins with the discovery of the orphaned infant Tom on the property of the wealthy and compassionate Squire Allworthy. Allworthy raises Tom as his ward, alongside the squire’s nephew Blifil. Tom is a handsome, passionate, impulsive young man, who, although he is kind and means well toward those for whom he cares, has a hard time keeping his passions in check. He loves Sophia Western, the daughter of his neighbor, but they cannot marry because of his inauspicious birth. Ultimately, a marriage is planned between Sophia and Blifil, and as a result of Blifil’s trickery, Tom is banished from the squire’s home. He wanders around, attempting to make his own way in
the world, but frequently falls prey to those less honest and kind than he is. In the end, it is discovered that Tom is actually the son of the squire’s sister, and thus his rightful heir, so he and Sophia can, and do, marry after all. The novel highlights themes of social class, justice, and heroism. Jennifer McClinton-Temple
Heroism in Tom Jones
In the early chapters of Tom Jones, we are introduced to Tom as a child and we see all of his good and bad qualities. The narrator’s description does not prepare the reader for a typical hero. He describes the boy as “having from his earliest years discovered a propensity to many vices.” Also, “he was indeed a thoughtless, giddy youth, with little sobriety in his manners and less in his countenance.” The narrator’s view of Tom influences our own, of course, and we are prepared for Tom’s mistakes and follies throughout the novel. The narrator continues reminding the readers that Tom is not someone from whom we should expect great things: “it was the universal opinion of all Mr. Allworthy’s family, that he was certainly born to be hanged.” This hero’s story has an inauspicious start. But Tom is a traditional hero in many ways. He is tall, well dressed, “one of the handsomest young fellows in the world.” In action, he is strong, ablebodied, and brave, while also polite and gentle. As a child, he saves Sophia’s bird, protects the gamekeeper from being fired, and does everything he can—even robbery—to support Black George’s family. As an adult, he fights highwaymen and protects women. Tom has several exceptional qualities. What makes Tom an interesting and contradictory hero is that his good qualities are offset by bad ones. Tom is reckless, impulsive, naïve, and lustful. He often acts without thinking, and sometimes his actions cause others harm. At 14, he sells his own possessions to help the Seagrims, though he hurts Squire Allworthy in doing so. In addition, he lacks a full respect for his masters, is careless with money, and is almost executed for murdering Mr. Fitzpatrick. But his most pronounced weakness is his fondness for women. Even though it is clear he truly loves Sophia, he has sex with three other women. Tom’s questionable relations with women
436â•…â•… Fielding, Henry seem unsuitable to a hero, but it is interesting to note that the women are the aggressors in each of these scenarios. Molly Seagrim and Mrs. Waters very deliberately seduce him, and Mrs. Bellaston hounds him unmercifully. Tom’s passionate, sentimental nature allows him to fall for these women, but he also feels sorry for each of them and is afraid to offend or hurt them. These faults, while substantial, appear less so when presented in contrast to other characters’ more serious faults. Tom comes by his impulsiveness and recklessness naturally. He almost cannot help himself, most often acting without thinking. This naturalness contrasts with characters like Blifil, whose faults are more studied. Blifil is cruelly ambitious. He sees opportunities to thwart Tom’s efforts and purposely takes them. When Tom sells his Bible to Blifil to raise money for Black George’s family, Blifil makes sure to stroll frequently through the house reading the Bible, showing it to his masters, pointing out passages in it. Naturally, people notice Tom’s name in the book, and Tom is punished. Blifil’s lowest act, keeping Tom’s parentage secret, negatively affects everyone’s lives around him. Blifil is a hypocrite and a dissembler. Another character who is contrasted with Tom is the companion on his travels, Partridge. Partridge, though a good man at heart and not a hypocrite, is fearful, suspicious, and he has an agenda: He hopes to benefit monetarily from reuniting Tom with Squire Allworthy. Though he often acts as a true friend to Tom, he also acts selfishly at times, keeping his hoped-for prize in sight. The constant scrapes the two get into show the contrast between the easy-going and courageous Tom versus the fretful and weak Partridge. One example is when a highwayman jumps them and demands their money. Tom wrestles him to the ground, while Partridge scrambles from his horse and cowers in the bushes, all the while crying out that he is dying. Heroism, in Tom’s case, is relative. Ultimately, Fielding suggests that a hero does not need to be perfect, that he can in fact be fallible. While never excused, Tom’s weaknesses appear unimportant compared to the weaknesses of others and to his own virtues. He seems worthy of love because his heart is open and loving. The two most admirable and charitable characters, Squire Allwor-
thy and Sophia, end up accepting Tom’s faults and embracing him. Here, the hero is not entirely exceptional, only relatively so. Cynthia Henderson
Justice in Tom Jones
The plot of Tom Jones is set in motion by an injustice. Tom Jones’s housemate, Blifil, lies to Squire Allworthy about Tom’s actions, causing Allworthy to reject his ward and banish him from his presence forever. Tom must therefore go out into the world and make his way with nothing. The injustice of his situation is clear to the reader during all Tom’s adventures, and the question of how or when Allworthy will discover this injustice is felt throughout. The parallel situation of Sophia running away from her father because of his unjust treatment of her sets up the two lovers for the many challenges they must face before they can be reconciled. One way the idea of justice is explored is through the character of Squire Allworthy. As a squire, he has the responsibility of determining how his dependents must be punished for their crimes. His word, literally, is law. We see early in the story how he punishes Jenny Jones for abandoning her child. Many around him tell him Jenny should be judged harshly; however, Allworthy decides to be kind to her. Indeed, he is grateful to have Tom in his life, and he lets that emotion guide his treatment. Therefore, he sends her away rather than putting her in prison. He deals similarly with the child’s father, as well as showing mercy in his dealings with Tom, Blifil, Black George, and Dowling. What constitutes justice is openly debated several times in the novel: When an offense or crime occurs, two characters debate what would be a just punishment. We see this when Square and Thwackum repeatedly quarrel about how to discipline Tom when he is a child: Thwackum always argues men should answer to religious law, and Square argues for guidance from the ancient philosophers. Another instance is when Tom and Partridge take positions on how to deal with the highwayman who jumps them near London. Partridge wants him executed, but Jones ultimately lets him go free because he sympathizes with the highwayman’s sad circumstances. Finally, there is the ongoing debate
Tom Jonesâ•…â•… 437 over how to punish Sophia for refusing to marry Blifil. Her father believes he has the right to lock his daughter up, but her aunt thinks no woman deserves such harsh treatment. At times during the narrator’s frequent addresses to the readers he discusses how confusing justice may be to them. When Tom lets the highwayman go and gives him money to help his family, the narrator tell us, “Our readers will probably be divided in their opinions concerning this action; some may applaud it perhaps as an act of extraordinary humanity, while those of a more saturnine temper will consider it as a want of regard to that justice which every man owes his country.” The narrator’s occasional appeals make the readers question their own assumptions about justice. Overall, however, it becomes clear that the world of Tom Jones is one where a merciful and personal justice is the best choice, one that considers the circumstances and the humanity of the wrongdoer over what religion, philosophy, or the law may say. Several characters who commit a crime are shown mercy, and as a direct result, they improve themselves. George’s crime of keeping the £500 he finds is forgiven, and he ends up trying to return the money. Though Allworthy tries to argue with Tom for being too sympathetic with George, saying “↜‘[s]uch mistaken mercy is not only weakness, but borders on injustice,’↜” Tom still releases him. Another man who receives merciful justice, the highwayman, reforms himself and starts providing for his family. When Tom is told how well the highwayman’s family is doing he can’t help thinking of the “dreadful consequences which must have attended them, had he listened rather to the voice of strict justice than to that of mercy.” Finally, Tom’s own crimes of imprudence and acting impulsively are completely excused by the two most noble and charitable characters, Allworthy and Sophia. Allworthy ultimately forgives Tom everything and bequeaths all his fortune to him. Similarly, Sophia, though upset at Tom’s past indiscretions with other women, forgives him everything and marries him. Instead of concentrating on Tom’s weaknesses and punishing him for his mistakes, both treat him with love and charity. The happiness all three experience in the end—living together
in peace and comfort—reinforces this notion of a merciful justice. Ultimately, Fielding suggests that justice requires weighing the whole of a man’s circumstances, character, and motives, not merely adhering to a prescribed system of justice. Cynthia Henderson
Nationalism in Tom Jones
Henry Fielding’s writing of The History of Tom Jones was interrupted by the 1745 Jacobite Rebellion, which pitted the supporters of the ruling Hanoverian royal family against supporters of the ousted Stuart family. The Jacobites, as they were known, were marshaled by Charles Edward Stuart, the grandson of James II, also called the “Young Pretender,” who had been deposed in 1688 in the Glorious Revolution, which was as much about James’s Catholicism as about the role of Parliament and hereditary right. The two major political parties fell within similar lines: the Whigs, who believed in the contractual role of Parliament with the Hanoverian throne, and the Tories, who supported the monarchial view and the Stuart claim. Following an aborted French invasion of England in 1744, Charles Edward landed in Scotland, raised an army of mostly Scottish Highlanders, and marched toward London, hoping to meet up with another French force coming from the south. The rebels achieved some military success and reached as far south as Derby before being routed at the Battle of Culloden in 1746, which ended the rebellion and any real hope for the return of a Stuart king. Although Jacobite influence declined precipitously following Culloden, their popularity remained in parts of the country and their questioning of the legitimacy of the Hanover family marked a significant moment in conflicting notions of nationalism in 18th-century England, asking who was the rightful ruler. Most accounts characterize Fielding as a Whig, citing the anti-Stuart sentiments expressed in his political journalism, including The True Patriot and the satiric Jacobite’s Journal. However, his novel Tom Jones, which is set during the ‘45 Rebellion, suggests a more complex engagement with the issue. Fielding populates his novel with both Tories and Whigs, Hanoverians and Jacobites. A Tory Jacobite
438â•…â•… Fitzgerald, F. Scott supporter, Squire Western, for instance, toasts the “King over the water” and names his favorite horse Chevalier, the honorific given to Charles Edward’s father, but his urban sister contemptuously cites the Tory London Evening Post to her brother, indicating her Hanoverian leanings. Likewise, the novel’s cast of characters features a secret Jacobite sympathizer in Partridge, an avowed anti-Jacobite in the Man of the Hill, as well as a company of soldiers on their way to fight the rebels in the north, all of which combine to provide a panoramic vision of mid-18thcentury politics. Tom himself has been viewed in parallel terms with Charles Edward. Although in book 7, Tom, as “a hearty Well-wisher to the glorious Cause of Liberty, and of the Protestant Religion,” decides to join the company of soldiers marching to meet the rebels, he shares with “Bonnie Prince Charlie” a reckless, romantic nature. Both are disinherited (as we later discover about Tom) and both are exiled, Charles Edward to France and Rome, Tom from Allworthy’s estate. While Charles Edward never regains the throne, Tom finds himself restored as the heir to Squire Allworthy in the end. Whether or not this is some sort of wish fulfillment is unclear, but to simplify Fielding in conservative terms is unfair. Similarly, in book 11, the innkeeper mistakes Sophia Western for Jenny Cameron, a fictionalized version of the real Jean Cameron, who reportedly raised and led 300 men in support of the Young Pretender. While there is no record of any type of intimate relationship between Jean Cameron and Prince Charles, Whig pamphleteers depicted her as his mistress and often pictured her armed and in highland attire. The romantic connection to Charles Edward ironically informs Mrs. Honour’s defense of Sophia: Would you imagine that this impudent villain, the master of this house, hath had the impudence to tell me, nay, to stand it out to my face, that your ladyship is that nasty, stinking wh—re ( Jenny Cameron they call her), that runs about the country with the Pretender? Nay, the lying, saucy villain had the assurance to tell me, that your ladyship had owned yourself to be so; but I have
clawed the rascal; I have left the marks of my nails in his impudent face. My lady! says I, you saucy scoundrel; my lady is meat for no pretenders. [. . .] My lady to be called a nasty Scotch wh—re by such a varlet!—To be sure I wish I had knocked his brains out with the punch-bowl. More concerned with her true identity being discovered as she has escaped from home, but finally understanding the landlord’s behavior, Sophia do aught but smile at the accusation, which earns yet another reproof from Mrs. Honour. Sophia’s reaction to the appellation, especially in contrast to that of the histrionic Mrs. Honour, is intriguing in terms of questions of nationalism. While she does not expressly follow her father’s political inclinations, she is also not a secret Jacobite, like Partridge. Even more than the parallel between Tom and Charles Edward, conflating Jenny and Sophia conflates nation and home, and the political tensions in the air are partially allayed as Sophia, fearing her father has discovered her, is relieved that it is only “several hundred thousand” French supporters of Charles Edward come to murder and ravish, as feared by the innkeeper. By poking fun at the exaggerated fears, Fielding contributes to the political discourse of the day focused on nationalist questions. Eric Leuschner
Fitzgerald, F. Scottâ•… The Great Gatsbyâ•… (1925)
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s masterpiece of American literature, The Great Gatsby, holds a prominent place in both the secondary and the college classroom. While offering a portrait of the Roaring Twenties in America, Fitzgerald gives readers a story of love and intrigue and demonstrates the possibility of social class movement within the United States. Jay Gatsby, the story’s central character, exemplifies the economic rise of a poor midwesterner to the heights of financial success. His life’s goal is to recapture the love interest from his youth, Daisy Fay, a Kentucky native and former debutante, who is wealthy in her own right—and now married to Tom Buchanan. The novel concerns itself with the struggles of rein-
The Great Gatsbyâ•…â•… 439 venting oneself to attain the dreams and pleasures of one’s youth. In Gatsby’s case, the effort goes terribly awry. Readers learn not only about the shaky prosperity of 1920s America, which ended in the economic devastation of the stock market crash and Great Depression of the 1930s, but also about the manner in which one man can similarly teeter on a fragile dream that shatters easily. In addition to the main plot about Jay Gatsby’s remaking himself, there are episodes that highlight racism, gender oppression, and the struggle of certain groups to achieve wealth and prosperity in the United States during the 1920s. Readers will gain an understanding of this fascinating decade of the 20th century while meeting characters who represent both its possibilities and limitations. Carla Verderame
The American dream in The Great Gatsby
Educators and lay readers alike often describe The Great Gatsby as a novel about the American dream—the opportunity for individuals to achieve economic independence and succeed in areas that are most important to them. Does the American dream exist in the 21st century? While opinions may vary as to whether America continues to offer those from beyond its shores the possibility of prosperity and a comfortable homeland, this novel, with its emphasis on reinventing oneself and its celebration of the Roaring Twenties, clearly focuses on themes of opportunity and possibility. While the story’s end is a tragic one that gives readers pause about the American dream and alludes not only to its possibilities but also to its limitations, the title character, Jay Gatsby, embraces the American dream on his terms and throughout his life. Born into a humble midwestern family, Jay Gatsby longs for all the material comforts given to a person of means. He works at various occupations— some of questionable integrity—to amass substantial wealth. Believing that money is necessary to attract the object of his desire, Daisy Fay Buchanan, he remakes himself into a corporate magnate who acquires a great fortune. He relives the years when he and Daisy dated, thinking that his new money will return him to the happiness of his youth and to the woman of his dreams.
Gatsby’s ability to reinvent himself comes from his belief in the American dream: He embraces the economic opportunities afforded to him by a nation based on a free-enterprise system. Further, he welcomes the idea of a fluid society—one in which individuals enjoy the opportunity to succeed financially. However, the novel itself poses interesting questions about the American dream. It celebrates the American dream by emphasizing Gatsby’s financial prowess, which he hopes will impress Daisy enough for her to return to him. He knows one of the reasons they were unable to marry years ago was that Daisy’s family and social class frowned on an engagement between a wealthy woman and a young man of modest means. However, the novel portrays the great financial disparity between the upper and lower classes of New York City and its environs—a setting that serves as a microcosm of the socioeconomic class distinctions that can be found throughout the United States. For example, George Wilson, who owns a service station, represents America’s working class. While George works diligently for his piece of the American dream, he will never achieve the status of Tom Buchanan (Daisy’s husband) or the wealth of the title character, Jay Gatsby. George Wilson was not born into a prominent family, such as the Buchanans of Chicago, Illinois—nor did he follow the way of Jay Gatsby by remaking himself into someone else. While F. Scott Fitzgerald draws on characters of various backgrounds who interact with one another in an attempt to show the spectrum of class dynamics in America, the author also uses various settings in the novel to highlight the complexity of the American dream. While some of the scenes are set in New York City, much of the novel takes place either in East Egg or West Egg, New York; the distinction between the two towns on the north shore of Long Island is made clear to readers early in the story. Nick Carraway, the novel’s narrator, points out that his rented summer cottage is located next door to Gatsby’s mansion, but is still located in less fashionable West Egg. Those with “old money,” such as the Buchanans, live in East Egg. This not-so-subtle reminder of class distinction underscores Gatsby’s humble background and suggests the challenges of moving beyond one’s origins. Regardless of Gatsby’s
440â•…â•… Fitzgerald, F. Scott financial success, he is still considered “new money” and, therefore, not quite up-to-par by the established families in the area. Another setting that calls the American dream into question is the Valley of Ashes. This is a desolate and abandoned strip of land that people travel through on their way to New York City. It functions to remind readers of the disparity between not only those with old and new money, but also those who enjoy a comfortable living in America and those who struggle to attain one. The Valley of Ashes juxtaposes the magnificence of Gatsby’s lavish parties and the comfort of the Buchanans’ lifestyle. The Great Gatsby gives readers an opportunity to reconsider the American dream and whether it serves, or indeed could ever fulfill, its supposed purpose. Also, the novel investigates themes of social class and social justice through the prism of a single man who longs for the happiness of his youth. Carla Verderame
Identity in The Great Gatsby
At the end of The Great Gatsby the novel’s narrator, Nick Carraway, suggests that the story of Jay Gatsby is a story of the West and that those who figure prominently in the book—Tom and Daisy Buchanan, Jordan Baker, Jay Gatsby, and Nick himself—are all westerners. The theme of identity looms large in Fitzgerald’s text and the characters’ birth places are not insignificant to their sense of self or to their role in the story. That is, one of the themes of the novel is that identity, for Fitzgerald’s characters, is very closely linked with native region and that while New York City and its environs are central to the action of the novel, the characters’ identities are drawn from and sustained by the area of their birth, although they are not literally “westerners.” At the beginning of the story, readers learn the social distinction between Tom Buchanan, a man of considerable means from Chicago, Illinois, his wife Daisy (Fay) Buchanan from Louisville, Kentucky, also of considerable means, and Jay Gatsby, a self-made man who hails from a small town in Minnesota. Newcomers to New York City and its surroundings, Tom and Daisy settle in fashionable East Egg, while Jay Gatsby, a millionaire in his own right but whose money has been earned under
suspicious circumstances, owns a mansion in the less fashionable West Egg, where Nick Carraway rents a small cottage for the summer. Nick, Daisy’s second cousin and an acquaintance of Tom’s in college, observes and relates the goings-on of the Buchanans and Jay Gatsby during the summer and early fall of 1922. He retells their story in the form of a flashback. Jay Gatsby’s determination to establish a new identity for himself sets him apart from the other characters in the text. Gatsby’s focus on acquiring wealth is unnecessary for the rest of the ensemble who come from comfortable economic backgrounds. Gatsby’s belief that wealth is an important aspect of his new identity and an equally important attribute to obtain Daisy’s love turns out to be wrong-headed in the end. In fact, Gatsby’s wealth gains him only superficial acquaintances who take advantage of his lavish parties and notable generosity. The love story between Daisy Fay and James Gatz reinforces the great lengths to which the title character will go in order to change his identity. James Gatz renames himself Jay Gatsby and works hard to build, through questionable activities, a lifestyle to which Daisy is accustomed. Thinking that he can return to the past when he and Daisy dated, and marry her now despite her current marriage to Tom, Gatsby arranges a meeting with Daisy through Nick. The reunion is an emotional one; it demonstrates the “rags to riches” story of the protagonist who is temporarily attractive to the well-to-do Mrs. Buchanan. The two reminisce about their early life together when Daisy was a popular debutante and Gatsby a soldier in World War I. Gatsby and Daisy have a short affair while Tom Buchanan carries on an extramarital affair of his own with Myrtle Wilson. The story ends badly for Gatsby. Mr. Wilson shoots Gatsby because he mistakenly believes that Gatsby was responsible for the car accident that killed his wife, Myrtle. Mr. Wilson was suspicious of his wife’s recent behavior but he was unaware of the true identity of his wife’s lover—Tom Buchanan. The case of mistaken identity turns out to be significant at the end of the novel. While the role of Jordan Baker is a small one in the story compared to that of her friend, Daisy Buchanan, Jordan’s character also focuses on the
The Great Gatsbyâ•…â•… 441 theme of identity in that she is a professional golfer who has gained a reputation for cheating—and is presented as somewhat careless and self-absorbed. A brief love interest of Nick’s, he comes to see Jordan for who she really is, which reinforces not only the carelessness of the upper classes in the story but also the importance they assign to a specific identity. That is, Jordan admits to her carelessness and self-centeredness but enjoys both the status and the material possessions that wealth makes available. Finally, as Nick concludes, the midwesterners in the novel who travel East find that they can neither abandon who they are, nor remake themselves into something new. Jay Gatsby, in particular, attempts to reinvent himself in order to return to a past that offered promise, only to pay the highest price, his life, for his discomfort with his humble beginnings and for attempting to manipulate his original identity. Carla Verderame
Social Class in The Great Gatsby
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s literary masterpiece, The Great Gatsby, provides a useful commentary on social class in America during the 1920s. The title character, Jay Gatsby, moves to a higher class from that into which he was born by amassing great wealth. He represents “new money” and is, therefore, looked upon with skepticism by Tom Buchanan, one of the most prominent and well-to-do characters in the novel. Tom’s wife, Daisy (Fay) Buchanan, and her distant relative, Nick Carraway, have enjoyed a high social standing throughout their lives. While they acknowledge the inequities of class in America— Nick’s opening narrative recalls his father’s advice not to judge others who did not benefit from the same advantages as he—they begin a summer of splendor on the outskirts of New York City. But the summer ends tragically: Both Jay Gatsby and Myrtle Wilson die in the prime of their lives, suggesting not only the fragility of life but also the complexity of social class and the problems that occur when desperate people hold fast to a social role that does not fit them. That is, straddling the divide among the classes comes at a great cost for both Jay Gatsby and Myrtle Wilson. Gatsby is killed by Myrtle’s husband, George Wilson, who
mistakenly thinks Gatsby was driving the car that ran over his wife. In fact, Daisy drove the car that killed Myrtle after a complicated series of events in New York City. While America promises economic opportunities for everyone, the characters in the novel demonstrate the difficulty in moving among classes by doing so recklessly and without regard for people who may be hurt along the way. For example, Myrtle Wilson focuses on material possessions available to her from her lover, Tom Buchanan, but shows little regard for the lives disrupted by her extramarital affair with Tom. Myrtle’s husband, George, is so devastated by the loss of his wife that he is driven to shoot Jay Gatsby in cold blood. Conversely, Jay Gatsby strives to recapture his days as a young soldier who dated Daisy Faye with the hope of marriage and a life together. Gatsby’s determination to achieve great wealth and to shift from lower to upper class is all done in an attempt to reclaim Daisy. He believes that wealth will impress her and she will divorce Tom and marry him. Gatsby wants to relive the time when he and Daisy dated, which he feels was the best time of their lives. Class status figures prominently in the episodes with Tom and Myrtle and Gatsby and Daisy because Myrtle and Gatsby believe that they are “moving up.” That is, they take the idea of class status and what it can offer seriously. However, Tom and Daisy, comfortable with wealth and accustomed to getting what they want, act in a frivolous manner. While Tom may care for Myrtle on some level, and Daisy may feel some tenderness toward Gatsby, Tom and Daisy enter their affairs mostly for fun and as a distraction from their daily lives. Nick Carraway, a faithful friend of Gatsby to the end, is disgusted at Tom and Daisy’s behavior. He says, “They were careless people, Tom and Daisy— they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made. . . .” Nick learns that Tom, Daisy, and others in their circle are not the least bit interested in the consequences of their actions. Fitzgerald’s text takes a hard look at the subject of social class in America not only through the
442â•…â•… Fitzgerald, F. Scott exploits of the Buchanans and their friends but also through the story’s various settings. The Valley of Ashes, in its state of decay, juxtaposes the lavish environs of East Egg and West Egg, New York. Readers are made aware of the idea of place in the novel and the manner in which it contributes to the author’s commentary on social class. Further, Tom Buchanan’s racist musings will also demonstrate the complicated link between race and social class and the way these categories of analysis play out in the novel. Finally, Fitzgerald suggests through the Buchanans’ (and other characters’) actions, that social class is not insignificant and the boundaries that distinguish social class categories are not easily overcome. Carla Verderame
Fitzgerald, F. Scottâ•… Tender Is the Nightâ•… (1934, 1951)
First published in four installments of Scribner’s Magazine in early 1934, Tender Is the Night contains many autobiographical similarities to Fitzgerald’s life. It follows the 1925 publication of The Great Gatsby as his final completed novel. In 1951, a second version was published posthumously; these two versions differ in terms of the novel’s chronology. The more frequently studied 1934 version, which was revised 12 times by Fitzgerald without an altered time scheme, opens in the present and uses flashbacks, while the 1951 version begins with background information and proceeds chronologically. Both versions tell the story of a young psychiatrist who marries one of his patients and later experiences another relationship that pushes him to drunkenness, disillusion, infidelity, and violence. The main characters of Tender Is the Night are Dr. Dick Diver, his wife and former patient Nicole, and Rosemary Hoyt, an idealistic young woman who marks a turning point in the doctor’s life while vacationing on the French Riviera. Through this triangle, Fitzgerald presents complicated relationships and the effects of their blurred boundaries: relationships like those between doctor and patient, husband and wife, parent and child, and lover and beloved. Alienation, ethics, illness, love, and sex and sexuality are important themes explored
through these three individuals and their unique bonds. Tender Is the Night shows how relationships with others may inspire stagnation or change. With Nicole, Dr. Diver stays unfulfilled and lonely, while with Rosemary, he becomes desirous and restless. Alone, he is his own man, albeit a bit lost. Erica D. Galioto
Alienation in Tender Is the Night
The theme of alienation most potently summarizes Tender Is the Night in its entirety. Indeed, Fitzgerald’s novel revolves around Dr. Dick Diver and his experience of alienation, or separation from himself and from others. This alienation can be divided into two main sections: before Dick meets Rosemary Hoyt and after he meets her. Before Dick meets Rosemary, he is certainly alienated from himself and from others, but he seems largely ignorant of this fact. After marrying his former psychiatric patient Nicole and for the six years of their marriage prior to his meeting Rosemary, Dick appears alienated from others and from his own personal and professional desires. This alienation stems from his unethical union with Nicole. When Dick and Nicole marry, their relationship continues to resemble the relationship between doctor and patient. As such, Dick concerns himself primarily with Nicole and her thoughts and emotions, rather than his own. Because psychiatrists are supposed to remain neutral in their professional relationships, Dick maintains this neutrality with his wife. He purposely alienates himself from his own emotions to heal her, so there is a separation in their romantic relationship. Dick must always hold back his own emotions to protect his wife from unpredictability, and he must react to her behavior rather than initiating his own. Unable to be completely truthful, relaxed, and intimate, they are alienated from each other as husband and wife and know each other only as doctor and patient. This separation not only works a wedge in their marital relationship, but it also separates Dick from his own identity. By withholding his own emotions for the good of Nicole’s continued treatment, he also sacrifices himself. Nicole, as wife and patient, is at the center of Dick’s world, and so he sidelines his own pro-
Tender Is the Nightâ•…â•… 443 fessional work to focus on her. While he once held promise as a young psychiatrist with several well-received publications, he abandons his treatise entitled A Psychology for Psychiatrists. As predicted in Zurich, his personal and professional life revolve around one person, and he finds himself alienated from her, himself, and his professional interests. Sadly, Dick does not even seem to realize his own alienation until he meets Rosemary six years into his marriage with Nicole. Punctuated by Nicole’s occasional breakdowns and mindless conversations with other Americans abroad, Dick’s life moves weakly in mindless repetition. After meeting Rosemary, however, Dick appears to realize his own alienation. When Rosemary inserts herself into the reality of Dick and Nicole, she arouses Dick’s desire but leaves it unfulfilled. Left with this unfulfilled desire, Dick, for the first time in six years, begins to acknowledge his own alienation from himself and others. “The turning point in his life” inspires him to feel his emotions, and, more important to change. When Rosemary abandons Dick, he is left wanting as he returns to his humdrum life. There he finds Nicole the same as before, but he feels different; he feels their disconnection, their alienation from one another. Once he acknowledges this separation, he turns away from her; he refuses his role of psychiatrist at home, turns his back on his domestic duties, and symbolically turns away from Nicole at night in bed. Confronting his own alienation and letting go of his past is a painful process; indeed, Dick engages in many negative and destructive behaviors during this time. He turns to alcohol, verbal and physical violence, and extreme disillusion. Perhaps his lowest point occurs after a night of debauchery when he is mistaken for the rapist of a five-year-old girl and becomes the object of public hatred. Those acquainted with the positive “Lucky Dick” find his transformation painful as well; the “Black Death,” his term for himself, destroys others as he metaphorically destroys himself. Through this painful destruction, Dick’s metamorphosis strips him of everything, so he may experience a rebirth. His father dies, he loses his job, and he loses the respect of others. He loses himself, but he also loses his wife and his intense alienation. For Dick, hitting rock bottom moves him in new directions—but
not Nicole. She quickly replaces Dick with another authoritarian male figure, Tommy Barban, with whom she is likely to continue yet another repetitive, alienated love in sickness and health. Dick, on the other hand, returns to private practice and moves deep into western New York after his painful transformation. Dick’s life is now simple, quiet, solitary, and wandering, but more connected to his own desires. Erica D. Galioto
Illness in Tender Is the Night
Psychological illness, rather than physical illness, pervades F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Tender Is the Night. Dick Diver is studying psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University during 1917 when America enters World War I. Grateful to escape actual combat after joining the army, he is instead sent to the Dohmler psychiatric clinic in Zurich, Switzerland, to finish his medical degree. While there, he makes a strong impression on a teenage patient, Nicole Warren, during a brief meeting when she is captivated by his uniform and he is unaware of her condition. When the army assigns Dick an executive director position at a neurological unit in France, Nicole writes him roughly 50 letters over the course of eight months. Through this emotional correspondence, Nicole’s symptoms improve, and when Dick returns to the clinic in Zurich, he seeks her out immediately. Upon his return, Dick learns the truth about Nicole’s mental illness through case files recounted by his friend and colleague Dr. Franz Gregorovius. Nicole’s early symptoms were characterized by paranoia, fear, and anxiety: all in relation to an illogical hysteria surrounding men who she feared would attack her. Her older sister, Baby, and father, Devereux, noted that these fantastical fits were first directed toward male figures she knew, but as time passed, her tantrums were more intense and included men who were strangers. Diagnosed with the divided personality of schizophrenia, Nicole leaves Chicago for the Zurich clinic, but the doctors insist on receiving more information from her father. He reveals, after much pushing and resistance, that he and Nicole developed a very close relationship when she was 11 after her mother died. On one occasion, their relationship turned physical and Devereux had
444â•…â•… Fitzgerald, F. Scott sex with his young daughter. Both ignored the incest immediately following and it never happened again, but five years later, Nicole’s bizarre symptoms point to her private mental torture. Once the source of her mental illness is uncovered, the doctors in Zurich agree to treat Nicole provided Devereux cuts off his contact with her. Though her fear of men is understandable when viewed through the lens of her disturbing rape by her father, Nicole is still considered sick because she cannot control her emotions. Her doctors diagnose her mental illness as a self-defense against men; due to her perverted sexual experience, she comes to view all men as evil, which manifests in extreme fright toward males. Her cure, the doctors think, would come when she learns to trust men again, and, ultimately, when she falls in love. To this end, the doctors seek to encourage a healthy transference between Nicole and a psychiatrist; through this psychological relationship, Nicole would transfer, or direct, her negative emotions toward men onto her doctor, and he would simultaneously receive them and inspire her to trust men again with his comforting responses. This transference does occur for Nicole, not within the walls of the clinic, but within her letters to Dick. Not until her epistolary communication with Captain Diver, as she calls him, does Nicole’s condition show any signs of improvement. Through the arc of these personal letters, Nicole’s hatred of men lessens and her symptoms dissipate. She once again begins to desire life outside the clinic and away from her past emotions. After learning of Nicole’s background and recent improvement, Dick meets her in person in Zurich, where her transference and improvement continue though they see each other only sporadically. Soon he is instructed by the other doctors at the clinic to break off the transference because they have located a cure in her recent emotions; Nicole is sufficiently in love with Dick and ready to be redirected. In clinical practice, this would be the point in analysis when the doctor removes support and encourages the patient to experience real life with these newfound desires. As both a psychiatrist and love interest, Dick has made Nicole’s transference strong, but their emotional tie works on him as well. Unable to maintain the professional and ethical neutrality
necessary for such a practitioner, Dick falls in love himself. While he knows that continuing the transference outside the clinic would mean devoting his personal and professional life to one person, he fails to end it. He gives in to Nicole and to his romantic feelings for her, and she replaces her authoritarian father with him. Unwilling to stave off his own desire, Dick marries Nicole and concedes to a life of stagnation: He is the healer, and she is the sick. Erica D. Galioto
Love in Tender Is the Night
Dr. Dick Diver has two relationships in Tender Is the Night that reflect love in different ways. First, he experiences a repetitive love with his wife, Nicole, and second, he experiences a transformative love with a young woman named Rosemary Hoyt. Before Nicole becomes Dick’s wife, she is his psychiatric patient, and due to this prior relationship, their marriage mirrors that arrangement. They claim to love each other, but their love is one that depends on each playing a certain role. Despite six years of marriage and two young children, Dick and Nicole are stuck in a repetitive pattern: Nicole is the patient and Dick is the doctor, Nicole breaks down and Dick repairs, Dick wants to heal and Nicole is sick. In short, Dick has a savior-complex, and Nicole needs to be saved. Their love exists only when each plays the appointed part, and those specific roles insist upon a denial of other personal characteristics. In their marriage, Dick and Nicole are not two people coming together with their unique differences, but they form a separate entity based on their relationship of dependence. The other vacationers on the French Riviera notice this coalescence as well and rarely refer to them individually, but rather as “the Divers” or even “Dicole.” Both Dick and Nicole sacrifice individuality to participate in this fusion. Without individual identities and with only endless repetition, Dick and Nicole’s love begins to wane. Nicole constantly feels as if Dick views her as the ignorant, tormented, weak girl of 16 she once was, and he knows how to relate to her only through the methods and practices of the psychiatrist he is. Governed by her moods and his diagnosis and cure, their love suffocates them both. In her own right, Nicole yearns for an emotional privacy she has never had,
Madame Bovaryâ•…â•… 445 while Dick wants to put himself first. Once Dick and Nicole are named doctor and patient respectively, they cannot end their repetitive love until Rosemary Hoyt comes between them. While Dick and Nicole’s love is characterized by repetition and fusion, Dick and Rosemary’s love can only be termed transformative. Through the six years of the Divers’ marriage there have been other young women who needed saving and Dick’s rescue mind-set certainly obliged. His relationship with Rosemary begins much the same way as it had with Nicole and with the others who succeeded her. Like his initial transference with Nicole, Rosemary quickly falls in love with Dick as she watches him on the beach. She idealizes him instantly and, unaware of his marital displeasure, sees him as perfect, omniscient, and perceptive. When she announces that she is in love with both him and Nicole, Dick dully mumbles that he has heard this admission many times before. Rosemary shares many similarities with Nicole. She is roughly the same age Nicole was when she met Dick, both of their fathers are doctors, and both seek men from whom to garner their own strength. Compelled by her idealization of him and similarity to Nicole, Dick begins to fall in love with Rosemary. Superficially, their relationship resembles his early bond with Nicole, but it soon becomes a transformative love instead. While Dick and Nicole find themselves in a repetitive love dependent on the adherence to old roles, Rosemary represents something new altogether. Nicole allows herself to be saved by Dick over and over, but Rosemary does not and refuses Dick’s plea to rescue her. This refusal represents a turning point in Dick’s life because for once he does not have to doctor a romantic interest. Paradoxically, young Rosemary decides to “give up” Dick, despite her feelings of love. Sensing the impossibility of a sustained relationship, Rosemary pulls back and relinquishes her claims on him. When she pulls back, she pulls back with love, but she pulls back at a time when Dick has opened himself to love her back. This movement leaves him with his own pulsing desire. For once, it has no obvious outlet, either with Nicole and her sporadic moods or with another young female desperate for his rescue. The passionless solitary kiss between Dick and Rosemary is emblematic of this strong renunciation.
Rosemary walks away, despite Dick’s desire, and in so doing, she opens his life to its greatest transformation. The metamorphosis first pulls him away from Nicole and then toward himself and his desires: personal, professional, and romantic. Erica D. Galioto
Flaubert, Gustaveâ•… Madame Bovaryâ•… (1857) Madame Bovary was controversial from the moment it was serialized in 1856. First published in book form in 1857 (and only after its author, Gustave Flaubert, was tried for obscenity), it remains one of the most important novels of all time. It is the story of a young French woman who quickly regrets her marriage to a provincial doctor and engages in two unsatisfying affairs before taking her own life. The novel begins by depicting Charles Bovary, but shifts its focus to Emma once the two are married. Emma quickly decides he is hopelessly dull. Her first words in the novel are striking: “Oh, why, dear God, did I marry him?” Longing for the romantic fantasies that she has read of in literature, Emma Bovary dreads her daily life and fills her time buying various luxuries. She finds a kindred spirit in Léon Dupuis, a handsome young clerk. They flirt and fall in love, but they do not realize each other’s feelings. Emma is seduced by Rodolphe Boulanger, a man who has had a number of affairs. When Rodolphe begins to tire of the affair, he dumps Emma in a contrived letter. She is heartbroken and nearly commits suicide; afterward she collapses into illness. After her recovery, a chance meeting with Léon leads to a second affair. When her debts overwhelm her and none of her lovers can save her, she commits suicide. The novel ends with the death of Charles, and their child Berthe consigned to labor in a cotton-mill. Through these depressing (but often comic) twists, Flaubert explores a number of important themes, particularly love, fate, freedom, gender, and commerce. James Ford
Fate in Madame Bovary
Fate plays a curious role in Madame Bovary. The characters often speak of fate and bemoan the role
446â•…â•… Flaubert, Gustave of destiny, but ultimately the events of the novel are driven more by the characters’ free choices than by any fate or destiny. Emma blames fate for her unhappiness, consistently refusing to see the role her own choices have played in determining the course of her life. Early in her marriage she feels destined for a blank, empty life. She contrasts the “endless twists of fate” that chance might bring in everyone else’s lives with her life, in which it is “the will of God” that “nothing was going to happen.” Of course, a great many things will happen in Emma’s life as the result of the choices she makes, but she is unable to see her freedom. Instead “she cursed God for his injustice,” for dooming her to a life of boring domesticity instead of the exciting romances she imagines. Soon she realizes that Léon loves her, and she wishes fate would allow her happiness—“If only heaven had willed it!” Thrilled at the possibility, Emma becomes consumed with love for Léon, but fails to act on it. Those around her see her suffering and dedication as “the pale mark of a sublime destiny,” and praise her devotion to her familial duties, while the reader knows that her devotion just masks her real passion for Léon. Completely oblivious to her unspoken feelings, Léon grows tired of waiting in vain and leaves for Paris. Emma is left even more depressed than before, until Rodolphe Boulanger arrives to exploit her ennui. Rodolphe uses the idea of fate to seduce Emma, playing on her romantic naïveté. He tells her that society is organized to prevent true happiness, but that ultimately two souls “will be together, will be lovers, because Fate ordains it, because they were born for each other.” He says that some “decree of Fate” has caused him and Emma to meet, that their “unique inclinations have been pushing us toward one another.” All of this talk of fate appeals directly to her literary ideas of love and destiny, not to mention her vanity. She is soon swept off her feet. He clinches his “scheme” when he tells her how futile it is to resist her destiny: “why struggle against Fate . . . why resist the angels smiling!” Unfortunately he soon grows tired of their affair, and when she urges him to rescue her from her life, he turns to fate for his escape. In his farewell letter, he explains that their love would have quickly faded, “for such is the fate of things human,” and tells her to “blame only
fate!” for their meeting. Rodolphe’s self-conscious use of fate as a cover for his desires only highlights the emptiness of grand ideas in the novel. As he says to himself while composing the letter, fate is “a word that always makes an impression.” Upon reading the letter, Emma is crushed. She decides she is “free” to commit suicide, but at the last minute she is called back from the edge. When she recovers from the illness that follows, she still blames fate (rather than Rodolphe or herself ) for her troubles. She dreams of “the life that could have been hers, if only fate had willed it so.” Charles Bovary rarely considers grand ideas, but when he does, he too blames his suffering on fate. When his operation on the clubfooted Hippolyte fails miserably, Charles decides that “Fate must have had something to do with it.” What Charles sees as fate, other characters consider “the will of the Lord”; the end result is the same. In the end Charles speaks once more of fate, but the encounter only highlights how empty the idea of fate is in the novel. After Emma’s death, finally confronted with the overwhelming evidence of her infidelity and having just sold the last of his possessions to pay her debts, Charles runs into Rodolphe, who invites him to have a beer. The narrator notes that Charles says the only “grand phrase” of his life: “Fate is to blame!” (209). Rodolphe knows that he “controlled this particular fate,” and he realizes how hollow Charles’s words truly are. In the world of Madame Bovary, fate is just another rationalization for the choices individuals make. James Ford
Freedom in Madame Bovary
The idea of freedom is bound up with considerations of wealth, gender, and power in Madame Bovary. Emma complains that only men are free, while she sees herself constrained by a variety of forces—fate, lack of wealth, her marriage, her sex, and even her child. Emma’s attitude is clearest during her pregnancy, when she longs for a son. A man, she thinks, is free, free to “explore each passion and every kingdom, conquer obstacles, feast upon the most exotic pleasures.” In her mind a man is free to act upon his desires, to follow his will wherever it leads, while a woman’s desire is always bound by
Madame Bovaryâ•…â•… 447 “the convention restraining.” At other times, she equates freedom with wealth, as when she says to Rodolphe that he cannot be “wretched,” because he is free, he is rich. Long after their affair fades, she still describes Rodolphe as “rich and happy and free.” In Emma’s imagination, these are synonymous. Men are rich, happy, and free, while women are poor, miserable, and subservient to the men around them. Emma is not deluded in seeing the world this way—her possibilities are limited in comparison to the men of the novel. Rodolphe is free to seduce whomever he wishes and to end the affair at a time of his choosing. But Emma herself freely embraces the affair, fulfilling her own desires despite the weight of convention. Léon is free to leave Yonville for Paris when he tires of provincial life (and his unfulfilled longing for Emma), a choice that she lacks. But Emma and Léon seem to be relative equals at the beginning of their affair, and ultimately he becomes her mistress as she comes to dominate their relationship. She has more freedom than she realizes, although not as much as her male companions. But even they are less free than she imagines. For Charles as a young man, playing dominoes is “a precious act of liberty,” an entrée into a forbidden adult world. He begins to enjoy life, memorizing poetry and hanging out in taverns; all of which leads him to fail his medical exams the first time out. Successful the second time, he begins his practice and his mother finds him a wife. Foolishly, Charles thinks this will be his chance to escape his mother’s rule, to be truly free; he “had pictured marriage as the advent of a better life, thinking he would be more free, and able to dispose of his own person and his own money.” But just as his mother dominated his youth, Charles’s first wife is master during their marriage. Freedom comes with her death, and Charles is briefly happy living alone, until he begins to long for Emma. After their marriage, Charles is happy and free again, because he is “the master of this lovely woman whom he adored.” Given that she feels trapped and miserable in the marriage, his own freedom is short-lived. After Rodolphe breaks off his affair with Emma, she recognizes a different kind of freedom, the freedom to end her life. “Why not have done
with it? Who was to stop her? She was free.” At the last minute Charles’s shouts of “Wife! Wife!” call her back, and she does not commit suicide— yet. Later she pursues an affair with Léon, and throughout it all she continues to spend more than she can afford on an endless supply of material goods. When her debts overcome her, and her lovers refuse to help her, she sees no other way out; she swallows arsenic. The novel’s last word on the complex relations among freedom, gender, and wealth is the plight of Berthe, Emma’s daughter. When Charles dies not long after Emma, poor Berthe is sent from relative to relative until she is taken in by a poor aunt, who sends young Berthe “to earn her living in a cotton-mill.” James Ford
Love in Madame Bovary
Love is a fickle sentiment in Madame Bovary, flaring brightly, dying quickly, and rarely producing any happiness. The first hint of this is the account of Charles Bovary’s parents. The narrator explains that Charles’s mother was initially “mad about” his father, but the “servility” of her love only turned him against her. Her affection for her husband quickly turns to rage at his carousing. She focuses her attention on her son Charles, who will himself be doomed to unhappy marriages. Madame Bovary chooses a wife for her son, an ugly, older widow, desired by many for her money. Charles expects to be free and happy in marriage, but is soon disappointed. His wife is his master, and his life is a boring routine until he falls in love with Emma, the daughter of one of his patients. Meanwhile, the manager of his wife’s money runs away with it all, much to the chagrin of Charles’s parents. Only a week after a confrontation in which Charles tries to defend his wife from his parents, she dies. He mourns her briefly (“she had loved him, after all”), but then is free to pursue a new life. He is happy for a time, living alone, until he begins to think again of Emma. Soon they marry, and all seems well. Charles loves his wife, but it is a one-sided love; he is blissfully happy to be “master of this lovely woman whom he adored.” For Emma, love is a “lightning flash” and a “tempest.” She longs for the kind of passionate love
448â•…â•… Forster, E. M. found in “the pages of the books.” She thought that she was in love with Charles before the wedding, but she decides she was mistaken when she does not feel “the happiness of which she used to dream.” Crushed by the gap between the happiness of her imagination and the plain dullness of her married life, Emma’s first words highlight her anguish: “↜‘Oh, why, dear God, did I marry him?’↜” She spends the rest of the novel (and her life) searching for the passion of which she dreams. Emma’s second chance at love comes when she realizes Monsieur Léon loves her. Outwardly she becomes the perfect wife, but inside she is “in turmoil.” The more she realizes her love for Léon, the more she hides it. She blames Charles for her unhappiness, while Léon becomes convinced that she is unattainable. Once again the ideal of love is detached from the reality of love, and Emma becomes an angel in Léon’s mind. He grows “tired of loving for nothing,” and so leaves Yonville for Paris. Emma’s regret at failing to act only intensifies her desires and her depression, though her love for Léon soon fades. She is easy prey for Rodolphe Boulanger, an expert with women, who takes advantage of Emma’s unhappiness. Rodolphe tells her their love is destined, and appeals to all her fantasies about love. She rejoices at the thought of “a lover,” and she is certain that at last she will know the passion of her “own imaginings.” Rodolphe, the great seducer, marvels at the newness of “undebauched love,” but he soon falls into his old habits. The more affectionate Emma is to him, the more indifferent he becomes. She longs for the happiness of her youth, and tries even to love Charles, repenting of her affair, but she is unable to follow through. She looks to Rodolphe to save her, to free her from her life; but he also longs to be free. Ultimately he agrees to take her away, only to stand her up on the appointed day. She nearly commits suicide, collapsing into illness. During her illness Emma has a vision of “a further love above all loves . . . a love that would blossom eternally.” She wants to be a saint, but her passion for God cools as quickly as her earlier loves. If only she could have loved purely, she thinks, “before the blight of marriage and the disillusion of adultery,” she would have been perfectly happy.
Meeting Léon again, she begins an affair with him. At first he is enraptured, because his imagination is fulfilled: “she was the lover in every novel.” But their love for each other fades, as she wonders again why reality falls short of her books. Emma is “immersed in her passions,” completely neglecting her increasing debts. When none of her lovers can pay her bills, she commits suicide, professing real love for her husband with her dying breath. James Ford
Forster, E. M.â•… A Passage to Indiaâ•… (1924)
Forster began A Passage to India (1924) before World War I and completed it after travel to India; it illustrates his belief that British imperialism devastated colonized countries, their people, and the relationship between the colonized and the imperial power. The novel is divided into three parts: “Mosque” and “Caves” are set near Chandrapore, India, and the final section, “Temple,” is set two years after the events of the first two sections, at the temple of Mau. The story follows Mrs. Moore, Adela Quested, Ronny Heaslop, Cyril Fielding, and Dr. Aziz. The first two sections detail the complicated relationships formed between the British and the Indians. Mrs. Moore and Adela journey to India so Adela can meet English barrister Ronny Heaslop, her potential fiancé, son of Mrs. Moore. Mrs. Moore and Adela do not comprehend the Britons’ hatred of the Indians and often meet with Dr. Aziz. The climax, a trip to the Marabar Caves organized by Dr. Aziz for Adela and Mrs. Moore, outlines Adela’s attack in the caves. The novel is not explicit as to whether it is physical; the attack can also be understood as psychological panic. Adela, however, testifies that Dr. Aziz did not attack her and leaves India. The novel ends after Fielding and Aziz have reunited in a Hindu community with the declaration that the two cannot cultivate a friendship as long as India remains colonized. Danielle Nielsen
Community in A Passage to India
In A Passage to India, E. M. Forster draws a complicated picture of India and Britain’s colonial
A Passage to Indiaâ•…â•… 449 relationship through the depiction of their religious and ethnic communities and the borders they transcend. The communities’ desires to maintain autonomy emphasize the colonial repression suffered by the Indians. To highlight the struggles, Forster illustrates failed interpersonal relationships and inter-community relationships, and through the narrative, readers see that while members of each community strive to keep others out, seclusion is not only impossible but also may not be desirable. Three communities make up the core of the novel: the Anglo-Indians like Ronny Heaslop, Cyril Fielding, the Turtons and Burtons, and Adela Quested; Muslims, such as Dr. Aziz, Mahmoud Ali, and Hamadullah; and the Hindus, Professor Godbole and his followers at Mau. While the Indian community is culturally and religiously diverse, many of the same struggles for freedom from colonialism are fought by the myriad Indian communities. This camaraderie is vital during the trial scene when the Hindu sweepers strike, Muslim women go on hunger strikes, the streets fill with riots, and little distinction is made between the religious groups and the desire for judicial fairness. The novel is fraught with failed interpersonal relationships between members of disparate communities, and Forster shows the distance between the diverse Indian community and the Anglo-Indian rulers at a “bridge party.” At the party, Adela meets some “real Indians” that she desires to see; it also facilitates political maneuvering between the AngloIndians and the upper-class Hindu, Muslim, and Parsee leaders. Though the men talk to one another, the interactions between Adela and the Indian wives highlight the differences between the British and Indian communities and the strain that colonialism places on interpersonal communications. Miss Quested attempts to talk to the “friendly Indians,” but they are too polite to cross this social boundary. Adela sees the bridge party as an opportunity to close the gap between the Britons and the Indians, and she wants to befriend the Indian women. Even though many of these upper-class women have traveled to England, Paris, and Italy, and speak English, Adela cannot make them speak to her because she is English. The Indian women’s civility, their colonial oppression, and their regard for colonial rulers
prevent them from seeing Adela as one who understands and relates to their community. The Indian women see themselves in a much different social and cultural community than the British women, and they treat the cultural and social differences as boundaries to communication and sympathy. They see Adela as a woman who must be esteemed as a ruler, even though she does not see herself that way. Adela’s inability to communicate with the Indian women as a friend strengthens Forster’s assertion at the end of the novel that “No, not yet . . No, not there” could Aziz and Fielding become friends. The strain that colonialism places on friendships and the inequality between communities prohibits friendship between Adela and the Indian women, between Aziz and Fielding, and ultimately between the Anglo-Indian and Indian communities. The community boundaries are rarely crossed for friendship but often for necessity. Forster demonstrates that colonial communities work against one another through dichotomies such as ruler/ ruled, outsider/native, and dominant/subordinate. The court scene in which Aziz is tried and released for the assault on Adela demonstrates an overlapping of the communities. When Mahmoud Ali defends Aziz, he wishes to call upon Mrs. Moore; he tells the court that Mrs. Moore is a friend to the Indians. Her name is immediately Indianized; she is deemed “Esmiss Esmoor,” a “Hindu goddess.” The groups in the street chant her name; Adela draws strength from her dead friend and the chanting around her, and she renounces the charges. When the Indians make Mrs. Moore a deity, they draw from the colonial culture to challenge it, for they saw in Mrs. Moore a freedom and stubbornness that few other Britons displayed. The Indians embrace Mrs. Moore and Adela as allies. Without these British women, Aziz may have been found guilty. The Indians learn that seclusion from other communities is impossible; within colonialism, the oppressed must use all of the tools available to them, even if they are shared with the colonizers. Danielle Nielsen
Gender in A Passage to India
Gender plays a significant role in A Passage to India, for it allows us to consider the novel’s purpose and
450â•…â•… Forster, E. M. the racial interactions from a different perspective than the normal anti-colonial stance. Forster portrays two types of gender relations between the Britons and the Indians: a stereotypical fear of Indian men and their sexual advances toward British women and a moderate view that demonstrates Indian men’s attempts to befriend British women without threatening them. In the novel, many British women maintain Victorian standards of femininity and gender roles, specifically the “angel in the house” attitude that asserted women were the moral exemplar of the British home. Auxiliary activities like acting, however, permitted women to portray different roles, yet the women required protection from the peering eyes of the Indians. Early in the narrative, the narrator alerts the reader to the social and racial “propriety” of the memsahibs (the British women in India) when he explains that the “windows [of the playhouse] were barred, lest the servants should see their mem-sahibs acting.” Women like Mrs. Callendar, Mrs. Burton, and Mrs. Turton (all wives of longstanding civil servants in the colony) demonstrate a stereotypical fear of and repulsion from the Indian people. The attitudes and actions of the AngloIndians promote a strict separation between the colonized and the colonizers, and they go to great lengths to protect their women from being seen by the servants. To remain hidden from servants while acting allows the women to act “improperly” without losing status in the colonial hierarchy, for the women are of a “superior” race (British) but not of a “superior” gender (female). It is obvious that gender identity is not as simple as being male or female, for the narrator indicates that the gender of the British actors (female) is just as important as the racial status of the performer and the potential viewer. This intricate and delicate relationship between “superior” race and “inferior” gender drives many of the interactions in Forster’s novel. Moreover, gender relations are rarely separated from other aspects of the novel like social class or race, and in A Passage to India it is often impossible to separate gender from other attributes that determine the characters’ social status in the colony. Not only are the memsahibs afraid that their servants (who are Indian) may watch them act, but
they also maintain that their husbands should avoid befriending any Indian man. The British schoolmaster, Cyril Fielding, “had discovered that it is possible to keep in with Indians and Englishmen, but that he who would also keep in with Englishwomen must drop the Indians.” While the husbands attempt to maintain that status quo of Victorian gender relations in the colony, the women in the novel, specifically those like Mrs. Callendar, Mrs. Burton, and Mrs. Turton, dictate the relationships that they will have, or more fairly, will not have with the Indian men. These women’s insistence that Indian men are troublesome and dangerous determines much of the colonial strife between the colonizers and the colonized and leads to the panic after Adela’s experiences in the caves. Forster portrays the memsahibs as stereotypical Anglo-Indians who are afraid of Indian men and believe that they must be protected. Forster, however, demonstrates that women need not fear Indians because, during much of the novel, Adela Quested attempts to befriend the Indians. Instead of treating the Indians as inferior people, she disregards the gender roles placed on her. Soon after her arrival in the colony, Miss Quested visits the college with Professor Godbole, Dr. Aziz, Cyril Fielding, and Mrs. Moore. As Fielding shows Mrs. Moore around the college, Adela remains with Godbole and Aziz. Adela does not show any discomfort with the two Indian men. It is only when Ronny Heaslop, Adela’s fiancé, confronts Fielding, explaining that he “oughtn’t to have left Miss Quested alone” because he doesn’t “like to see an English girl left smoking with two Indians,” that Adela’s actions cause concern. While Adela demonstrates that Indians and British women can try to befriend one another, Ronny the bureaucrat attempts to maintain the strict gender boundaries devised by the memsahibs. The relationship Adela forges with the Indians cannot withstand the pressure of the other British women. She experiences discrimination from them, and her challenge to the stereotype eventually debilitates her and forces her to return to England. Thus, not only are relationships between different genders challenged and challenging, but the expectations held by those of the same gender generate stress. Danielle Nielsen
A Passage to Indiaâ•…â•… 451
Nationalism in A Passage to India
An understanding of nationalism allows us to analyze the relationship between the Indian residents and the British rulers in Chandrapore, gain a better understanding of the Indian desire for freedom, and see who the proponents for freedom are in the novel. The complicated relationships expose the complicated sense of nationalism in a country yearning for freedom. Forster’s portrayal of nationalism illuminates the relationships and ideologies between two opposing groups and their concepts of political control in India. For much of the novel, the British espouse the most nationalistic beliefs to avoid the Indian subjects who surround them, while the Indians quietly go along. After Adela Quested and Mrs. Moore intimate the desire to meet some Indian subjects, the memsahibs reluctantly throw a bridge party and invite some of the middle-class Indians. This gathering, however, is not successful. As Mrs. Moore and Adela observe the uncomfortable tension between the Indians and the British, Ronny Heaslop explains to them that “The educated Indians will be no good to us if there’s a row, it’s simply not worth while conciliating them, that’s why they don’t matter. Most of the people you see are seditious at heart. Ronny’s remarks illustrate both the Indians’ and the Britons’ nationalist beliefs. Few of the Indians invited “mattered,” and many were not of the highest caste in Chandrapore. Rather, those invited dressed in a manner similar to the Britons, and they were more likely to be loyal to the British than other Indians. The Indians who would “be no good” to the British are instead loyal to the Indian cause as Indian nationalists. As with the bridge party, the British exert their control over the middle-class Pathans in India by inviting them to gatherings and by placating them to increase the possibility that these Pathans will relinquish any nationalist tendencies and support the British regardless of the Indian nationalism surrounding them. Furthermore, Ronny’s anxiety regarding a “row” relates to the growing tensions between the Indians and their British colonizers and exposes the different ways that nationalism plays a role in the Britons’ use of the Indians. Because so many of the educated, high-caste Hindus favor freedom, they are perceived
not only as nationalist but also as dangerous to the empire. In essence, Ronny’s sense of nationalism— his pride in Britain, his pride in colonialism’s role, and his pride in his job—encourage him to see the real Indians as only those people who would support the Britons. Furthermore, Ronny’s pride indicates a British nationalism that bolsters the imperial power and prestige of Britain. While Ronny’s comments at the bridge party demonstrate his beliefs about nationalism—or lack of nationalism—in the Indian mind, the atmosphere at Aziz’s trial reveals the power of Indian passion and Cyril Fielding’s sedition. Aziz’s imprisonment causes Chandrapore workers to strike, specifically the sweepers, and even Muslim women declare a hunger strike. These actions demonstrate both support of Aziz and antiBritish sentiments. Though the women’s hunger strike has no effect because they are concealed in harems, the sweepers’ strike is detrimental to the health of the city. By striking, the Indians demonstrate their desire to control the atmosphere and the judicial system—in essence, the desire to control their country. The Indians, who “did not matter” at the bridge party, suddenly do. The narrator describes the Britons’ anger at Fielding: “he [Fielding] encouraged the Boy Scout movement for seditious reasons; he received letters with foreign stamps on them, and was probably a Japanese spy. This morning’s verdict would break the renegade, but he had done his country and the Empire incalculable disservice” (238). Just as Ronny suspects the Indians’ ability to be “seditious” to the Indian cause, the Britons feel that Fielding shows the same sedition to the Empire. Forster illuminates the different ways in which nationalism can play out between different ethnic and social hierarchies. For Forster, the nationalism lies either with the British Empire or with free India, and it is revealed not only by those who ethnically belong to the group, but also by those who support it. Thus, middle-class Indians who thrive under the raj support the British, while Britons who oppose the raj can align themselves with the Indian populace. Nationalism, however, is not simply between the Indians and Britons, as indicated by the role that
452â•…â•… Forster, E. M. middle-class Indians and Fielding play, but also between the Hindu and Muslim populations, and this relationship is played out more extensively in the novel’s final section. Danielle Nielsen
Forster, E. M.â•… A Room with a Viewâ•… (1908)
A Room with a View follows Lucy Honeychurch and her cousin, Charlotte Bartlett, to a small English-run hotel in Florence, Italy. Lucy, who was used to having more freedom, finds her every step watched and protected by her cousin. Themes of nature, innocence and experience, and tradition emerge through the novel’s many conflicts. Lucy and Charlotte meet a father and son, Mr. Emerson and the younger George Emerson, when they trade rooms to get a better view. The radical, open-minded Emersons invite scorn from other travelers who disapprove of their outspoken manner. Lucy becomes very bored in Italy until suddenly she witnesses a stabbing. After she faints from shock, George comforts her and admits to an interest in her. Shortly after an unexpected kiss from George on a day outing, Lucy and her cousin return to England. Lucy finally accepts the third marriage proposal of Cecil Vyse, an uptight, snobbish suitor. But scandal keeps threatening her placid life. Lucy largely remains submissive to her relatives and fiancé. She finds her confidence shaken when the Emersons move into a nearby neighborhood. After much personal turmoil and some counseling from the elder Emerson, Lucy breaks off her engagement with Cecil and turns to George instead. She embraces a more passionate life free from many of the senseless expectations her family and society have of her. The exaggerated characterization adds a comical approach to A Room with a View, and mocks the grave importance the characters attach to ordinary social situations. Elizabeth Walpole
Innocence and Experience in A Room with a View
A Room with a View follows several young characters whose actions reveal their innocence. Lacking expe-
rience in their social circles, they try following older adults or rebelling against them to test the limits of their actions. While the story focuses on the theme of finding one’s own view of the world, it also shows the obstacles and mistakes the young characters must face as they mature. Lucy and George romanticize the idea of being young. In their relationship, any contact they have holds monumental importance for each of them. Although Charlotte suggests that George is using Lucy, George’s eagerness to be with Lucy is actually a sort of innocent first love. He takes life very gravely and struggles with youthful questions about the purpose of his existence, as when he leaves “an enormous note of interrogation” scrawled on paper in his room. He sees Lucy not just as an attractive girl but as a savior. Before he is able to comprehend or recognize his love for her, he remarks, “I shall want to live.” In his youthful inexperience with love, he swings quickly from one drastic emotion to another. Lucy fears adulthood because she thinks it is completely stifling. She much prefers playing tennis with 19-year-old Freddy and 13-year-old Minnie. Enjoying the exercise, she concludes, “how much better to run about in comfortable clothes than to sit at the piano.” She believes that to grow up is to step into society’s mold for her. Her fatalistic attitude blinds her from seeing her ability to make her adult life enjoyable. Lucy sees marrying Cecil as her only option. She dreads living with Cecil, who refuses even to join a game of tennis. From a city upbringing and a good education, Cecil despises “the physical violence of the young,” even in sports. Lucy does not realize other types of men might be more compatible with her personality. Her lively spirit delights in more rowdy, imaginative games such as “bumble-puppy” in which each tennis ball has a name, and one hits “tennis-balls high into the air, so that they . . immoderately bounce.” She willingly makes up her own rules for tennis, but her fear of failure prevents her from taking such charge of her own life. Many of the “ridiculous child” characters find opportunities to rebel. Although Charlotte’s attempts to shelter Lucy are often exaggerated, Charlotte understands how easily Lucy might tar-
A Room with a Viewâ•…â•… 453 nish her reputation. Lucy does not see the scandal in switching to George’s room or exploring Italy on her own. Charlotte, while not being a very loyal friend, certainly has more experience with matters of gossip than Lucy does. As Charlotte predicted, the story of George kissing Lucy finds its way into Miss Lavish’s novel. Lucy is horrified when she realizes the romance in the novel mimics her own encounter in the Italian field of violets. The scene, filled with language such as, “he simply enfolded her in his manly arms,” sounds even more risqué than Lucy’s actual experience. Suddenly, Charlotte’s warnings seem more meaningful. Other characters are less thoughtful than Lucy when it comes to rebellion. Their brutal honesty reveals innocent ambivalence to etiquette. When Cecil asks Freddy if he is happy about Lucy’s engagement, Freddy admits, “I had to say no. He ought never to have asked me.” Minnie, the rector’s niece, likewise blatantly refuses to attend church. In her “church protesting” Minnie questions, “why shouldn’t she sit in the sun with young men?” The nature of Minnie’s protest is not on religious grounds, but instead shows her opposition to following the rest of the women in a dull activity. By asking the reason for going to church, she points out how it is more of a social than religious obligation. She also inadvertently reveals that there is a wider range of freedoms allowed for men than women. Although George asserts that “love and youth matter intellectually,” the end of the novel raises doubts as to whether these virtues will flourish for long. Lucy and George try to escape English society to avoid conflict. The novel’s end treats the situation as though the couple has found a haven away from social connections. They act as though in a foreign country social codes are nonexistent. While Lucy and George have found freedom to grow up as they please, they remain largely inexperienced and their idyllic views show a lot of naiveté. Elizabeth Walpole
Nature in A Room with a View
Many of the most significant events in A Room with a View occur outdoors. Forster seems to suggest that when the characters are in nature, they can behave more naturally. In a novel where manners and social
standing carry great importance, being in nature gives characters moments away from judgmental eyes. Nature affords them privacy and extended space for expression. For example, the characters enjoy Italy’s countryside by planning a group picnic. While Charlotte fusses about catching a draft from the damp ground, Lucy treks through the woods. She follows the Italian driver through dense undergrowth and brush to see George. During this walk, Lucy feels that “for the first time she felt the influence of Spring.” When she sees George it is as though nature has set him up as a suitor, since he is surrounded by “violets [that] ran down in rivulets and streams and cataracts, irrigating the hillside with blue.” The overwhelming beauty of her surroundings heightens her surprise and intensifies her reaction to George’s presence. George and his father express a special appreciation for nature. Their last name, “Emerson,” refers to Ralph Waldo Emerson, a 19th-century American author. He was part of the Transcendentalist movement, which valued nature and individualism. His writings, similar to the Emerson characters’ behavior, rebelled against society’s usual philosophical and spiritual beliefs. The Emersons in A Room with a View display their love of nature when they “picked violets and filled all the vases in the room of . . . the Miss Alans.” The Miss Alans react to the gesture by calling it, “so ungentlemanly and yet so beautiful.” The Emersons appreciate the flowers’ potential to bring great happiness. In a very natural way, they behave according to their instinct of goodwill and do not pause to consider the strangeness of such a gift. Cecil, in contrast, pretends to be an expert on nature, which he calls the “simplest of topics.” His confidence, however, is unfounded and seems even more false in the presence of Lucy, who grew up in the country. Cecil points out to Lucy, “I had got an idea—I dare say wrongly—that you feel more at home with me in a room . . . Never in the real country like this.” Cecil’s comment is accurate, as it relates to Lucy demanding to leave Florence immediately after George kissed her at the field of violets. The discomfort that Cecil recognizes applies to his own feelings as well. He feels equally nervous being
454â•…â•… Forster, E. M. alone with Lucy on the path through the woods. Before kissing Lucy, Cecil “became self conscious and kept glancing round to see if they were being observed.” Cecil seems unable to act naturally, even if it means growing closer to Lucy. Lucy suddenly realizes that she is not content with Cecil, who loves only the part of her personality he feels is secure and predictable, instead of admiring the Lucy who “dreamily” recalls bathing in the Sacred Lake. Although religion is often mocked in this novel, the hidden pond in the woods is called “holy.” It has a sense of magic that harkens back to Lucy and Freddie’s childhoods. When Freddie feels uncomfortable meeting the Emersons, his immediate reaction is to ask them to “have a bathe.” Although his suggestion sounds like a joke, Mr. Beebe, Freddie, and George jump in the tiny pond for a swim. When Cecil, Lucy, and her mother accidentally stumble across this rowdy gathering, they are shocked and speechless. George and Cecil each use the opportunity to make an impression on Lucy. George, a complete mess and without clothes, walks up to the crowd and says hello. Cecil, who felt uncomfortable knowing that Lucy herself used to play in this pond, tries to usher her aside to prevent her from becoming upset. These telling moments help Lucy realize that she does not want to be sheltered by others, especially when she is not even frightened or in danger. A Room with a View reveals two important elements of nature. Nature is the outdoors, where fickle weather and inviting landscapes disrupt the characters’ carefully made plans. But nature is also human nature, and characters must learn to rely on their instincts when their emotions are stirred for better or worse. For Lucy, the time spent outdoors provides her with an opportunity for private and honest communication. She feels free to act “naturally.” From learning to interpret and appreciate nature, the characters form closer connections with each other. Elizabeth Walpole
Tradition in A Room with a View
Mr. Emerson’s first words in the novel are “I have a view!” Although he is speaking about good scenery outside his window, his words also introduce the prevalence of traditions in the novel. Each charac-
ter’s view, or perspective on life, has been shaped by the habits of his or her society. Either by seeing their cultural and familial traditions as essential or tossing them aside for more radical behavior, the characters are all affected by the framework of tradition. In Italy, the English characters’ mix of confusion, fascination, and disgust toward native Italians begins the novel with a great clash of cultural tradition. When led by the young Italian driver to George Emerson, Lucy swings back and forth in her generalizations about Italians, from “Italians are born knowing the way” to “an Italian’s ignorance is sometimes more remarkable than his knowledge.” Even being unable to speak Italian, Lucy is eager to observe a different culture and assess it in relation to her own. Aspects of Italy’s ancient traditions appear when Forster refers to Roman gods and goddesses or great painters. The superhuman nature of the myths contrasts with the English characters’ trivial worries. Specifically, after the carriage ride, the characters feel as though the god Pan has played tricks on them. Their idea of Pan has already lost some of this god’s grandeur, as he only “presides over . . . unsuccessful picnics.” Instead of recalling epic battles and love affairs described in Roman mythology, the English tourists are preoccupied with their guidebooks and the rain ruining a drive. The English obsession with mundane drawing-room chatter obscures the excitement of Italy’s rich, imaginative heritage surrounding them. Back in England, Lucy and her family have strong social ties to the neighborhood based on the false presupposition that they are part of the aristocracy. In fact, Lucy’s father was a lawyer who bought the country home to fix it up and then ended up moving into it. Their family is not old nobility at all. Lucy’s mother finds this mistake “extremely fortunate for the children” and accepts the opportunities it presents for her to easily make friends. Even the illusion of representing a traditional, well-off country family is enough to grant success in Lucy’s neighborhood. Cecil, Lucy’s fiancé, is as confused as the neighbors concerning what to expect from Lucy’s neighborhood. His intensely proper behavior comes from his lack of understanding of country traditions.
Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girlâ•…â•… 455 Cecil grew up in London with more cosmopolitan traditions and so becomes very impatient and frustrated when he has to make trips to all the country homes to meet many friends of the family. He cannot abide how his “engagement is rendered as public property.” Cecil and Lucy cannot decide whether country or city traditions are superior. Lucy finds herself bored with her neighbors’ “kindly affluence, their inexplosive religion, their dislike of paper bags, orange-peel, and broken bottles.” At the same time, Cecil doubts his own environment and instead wants to “bring [his children] up among honest country folks for freshness, send them to Italy for subtlety, and then—not till then—let them come to London.” Regardless of any final decision on the matter, Lucy and Cecil are curious about each other’s traditions and use their different backgrounds to explain why they have trouble understanding one another. Mr. Emerson and his son, George, represent a rejection of typical English traditions and ways of thinking. Mr. Emerson brags that he gave his son a childhood “free from all superstition and ignorance that lead men to hate one another in the name of God.” He startles fellow tourists in Italy when he complains loudly in a church about unfair treatment for laborers and the ugliness of religious art. Whereas Lucy comments on her admiration for Giotto’s paintings because she remembers reading about them, Mr. Emerson ignores traditional opinions. Mr. Emerson teaches Lucy to care less about other opinions and instead encourages her to continue on her tour even after she loses her guidebook and her chaperone. By the end of the novel, Lucy becomes more open-minded and realizes that a break from tradition is sometimes necessary for personal happiness. At first, Lucy had thought that “life . . was a circle of rich, pleasant people, with identical interests and identical foes.” Her experience in Italy opens her mind, as when she observes, “social barriers were irremovable, doubtless, but not particularly high.” She takes a risk and breaks off her engagement with Cecil. Lucy causes her mother great shock when she moves to Italy with George. A letter from home reminds Lucy that “she had alienated Windy Corner, perhaps for ever.” By abandoning her fam-
ily traditions and defying their expectations, Lucy learns to trust her own conscience and explore more unconventional views as well. Elizabeth Walpole
Frank, Anneâ•… Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girlâ•… (1950)
Like many girls before and after her, Anne Frank began to write her deepest secrets, greatest fears, and strongest desires in the confines of her adolescent diary. Unlike most girls, Anne’s diary became known throughout the world. Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl is one of our most profound insights into the lives of Jews in hiding during World War II. Anne’s initial revelations of schoolyard crushes and birthday party plans change drastically when she is forced to go into hiding in 1942, following the 1940 Nazi occupation of Holland and the institution of strict policies against Jews in that country. Although cloistered in the annex of her father’s warehouse, Anne’s life is a rich one as she navigates the throes of adolescence. Although often in despair over the atrocities committed against Jews outside of her little world, the constant battle of identities with her mother, and the sheer dreariness of a life spent entirely indoors, Anne manages to take comfort in her writing, a crush on her roommate, Peter Van Daan, the warm relationship she shares with her father, and her tireless studies. Although Anne died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in Lower Saxony in March 1945, her words and thoughts have lived on. Following Anne’s removal from the annex, Miep Gies, one of the Dutch women who helped care for the Franks and their companions, collected the scattered pages of Anne’s diary and saw them published in 1947 with the help of Anne’s father, Otto Frank. Since then Anne’s diary has become one of the most widely read and widely published books in history. Jeana Hrepich
Cruelty in Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl
Although readers know nothing of Anne Frank’s life in Bergen-Belsen, the concentration camp
456â•…â•… Frank, Anne where her life was taken, they can assume that her story would have been one laden with the cruel existence of such a treacherous place. Before Anne, along with her family and friends, was found in the secret annex that concealed them from Nazi forces for just over two years, she speculated about the lives of Jews who were not as lucky as she perceived herself to be. Anne’s frequent reveries about the atrocities being committed outside of her cloistered world and the extreme deprivations that she and her companions in the annex faced make Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl one of the most important chronicles of the cruelty committed against Jews during World War II. Even before Anne made her home in the annex of her father’s warehouse she experienced some of the restrictions imposed on Jews. In 1940 Germany occupied Holland, where Anne made her home, and like all Jews she was forced to wear the yellow Star of David, which came to symbolize captive Judaism. Jews were also commanded to yield to a curfew, deliver up their bicycles, and shop within a limited frame of time in designated Jewish shops. Jews were forbidden to drive, ride in trams, partake in public sports, go to the cinema and other arts arenas, and visit Christians. Anne’s friend from school, Jopie, said to her, “You’re scared to do anything, because it may be forbidden.” Yet Anne felt that “things were still bearable” in spite of the ever-increasing restraints against Jews. Like so many Jews at the time, Anne did not appreciate the fact that these restraints were incremental nails in the proverbial coffin. Circumstances were no longer bearable for the Franks when Anne’s sister, Margot, was “called-up” by German forces. Intending to escape one cruel fate, Margot and her family trade in their lives for another. On one hand the Franks are lucky to have an alternative life available to them. On the other hand the isolation and destitution they would endure for just over two years was a hardship deeply felt by all. Anne explains that “silence fell on the house; not one of us felt like eating anything” the night before they were to begin their new life. On their arrival at the annex Margot and Mrs. Frank are too miserable to help unpack their belongings. Yet their lives in the annex develop into a state of
sustainability, though misery abounds. After about a year in hiding Anne writes: “We miss so much here, so very much and for so long now.” She goes on to say, “I long for freedom and fresh air.” Anne’s suffering pales in comparison to the suffering of others in the annex, though. Perhaps because she retains steadfast hope, or maybe because of her youth, Anne is able to rebound more easily than her mother, who seems to feel the cruelty of her situation more acutely than anyone in the annex. Anne says of her mother, “Her counsel when one feels melancholy is: ‘Think of all the misery in the world and be thankful that you are not sharing in it.’↜” Anne rarely depicts her mother out of her usual malaise. Readers might assume she habitually follows her own advice. As Anne very astutely notices, however, Mrs. Frank’s means of surviving her own cruel fate is flawed. If Mrs. Frank should ever “experience the misery herself,” how is she supposed to live? Like all of the women in the annex, Mrs. Frank died in a concentration camp after being discovered by the Gestapo. Anne, too, cannot stop herself from comparing her life to the lives of other Jews. “If I just think of how we live here,” Anne writes, “I usually come to the conclusion that it is a paradise compared with how other Jews who are not in hiding must be living.” Indeed, Anne’s perception of the barbarism committed against Jews outside of her walls was on point. Anne saw other people face the same cruelties she would endure later. “Day and night more of those poor miserable people are being dragged off, with nothing but a rucksack and a little money. On the way they are deprived even of these possessions. Families are torn apart, the men, women, and children all being separated.” Like so many before her, Anne was stripped of all of her belongings, including her diary. She had to endure being separated from her father, her mother, and eventually her sister. Families were sent to concentration camps where many faced a certain death. Anne Frank, who felt the suffering of others, died of typhoid disease just a few months before she would have been liberated. Her voice carries the resounding story of the cruel fate of the 6 million Jews who died at the hands of the Nazi regime. Jeana Hrepich
Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girlâ•…â•… 457
Hope in Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl
In the classic picture of Anne Frank, a set of dark, penetrating eyes peer out of a radiant face. Across her lips lurks a contented smile, a sign of a happier time than her famous record, Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl, chronicles. Yet despite the tragedies and grave ordeals Anne confided in her diary, she still maintained a sense of hope that her photographs often exude. Perhaps not surprisingly, Anne’s first entry, written on her birthday, is permeated with the kind of hope familiar to most 13-year-old girls. She is eager about birthday gifts: books, flowers, and food. What puzzles the mind is that the later entries, written in Anne’s second and third years in hiding in a secret annex, are still hopeful, still seeking light amid so much darkness. Anne acknowledges that while most people can find happiness while surrounded by nature, she can no longer afford that luxury. Once she could ride her bike down Amsterdam streets. Later her only access to nature is a view of it out of a window in the secret annex, in the attic of her father’s business. Sitting in front of that window Anne contemplates the freedom she once had, and her desire to breath fresh air again. Rather than bemoan her fate, Anne concludes that what she does have, a pureness of heart and happiness that can only be temporarily smote, is plenty of restitution for what she has suffered, and she hopes that God will bring her comfort. “As long as this exists,” Anne says, “I cannot be unhappy.” At the same time, Anne believes that God is to blame for the torment she and other Jews have suffered, but she also believes that he will redeem the many fallen at the hands of Hitler and the Nazi Party. Like most adolescents, she wavers between extremes, at times preoccupied by an impassioned frustration and later dominated by a zealous faith in God and mankind. In comparing herself to her mother, Anne cannot comprehend how Mrs. Frank can focus on the misery that exists in the world when Anne is so preoccupied by the love and beauty that persists around her. “On the contrary, I’ve found that there is always some beauty left,” confides Anne. While Mrs. Frank would cheer one
up by comparing their plight with those who are worse off, Anne prefers to revel in the existence of a benevolent God, the beauty and sunshine in nature, and the loveliness that abides within every human spirit. In effect, Anne’s position is one that she must take in order to survive: Losing hope would be capitulation to misery. Anne’s ability to hope amid despair, to see beauty and love in one of the darkest periods of history, has much to do with her budding relationship with Peter Van Daan, the teenage son of the family that shares the annex with the Franks. Her tender relationship with Peter, which includes the first throes of romance and physical titillation, marks a new phase for her sexually and developmentally. Anne’s emotional attachment to Peter and her burgeoning sexuality are fresh and exciting in an environment where all else is stagnant. Anne blooms with hope and breathless anticipation as the intimacy of her encounters with Peter deepen. Even when Anne ponders more sober matters, such as the crisis of the Jewish people, she hopes against all odds that when the war is over, her suffering and the suffering of those worse off than she will precipitate a universal education about the atrocities committed against them. She hopes that the people of the world will learn goodness by this vulgar scar on history. Instead of forsaking her religion, Anne reminds Kitty, the name she gives her diary’s persona, that God has never deserted her people, and that “a solution will come.” Although her faith and history were all that she had to encourage such beliefs at the time, she insists that the strong will not only survive but prevail. Anne is not irrationally hopeful throughout the whole of her diary, however. In fact, she frequently writes in despair. Nevertheless, given the loneliness, the isolation, and the privations Anne endured, one might expect her diary would be a tome of anguish. In the true spirit of her character, Anne was hopeful despite tremendous adversity. Anne assures Kitty, “we still hope, hope about everything.” The soulful eyes that stare back from her photos reflect her withstanding spirit and a reservoir of something essential to her constitution: hope. Jeana Hrepich
458â•…â•… Frank, Anne
Survival in Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl
Few readers who pick up a copy of Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl are unaware of the demise of its titular heroine. Like 6 million other Jews, Anne Frank died in a concentration camp during World War II at the hands of Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime. It may seem strange, then, to identify survival as a guiding theme in her work. However, Anne Frank’s diary chronicles a succession of days in which the only task at hand for the eight people living in the annex of Otto Frank’s warehouse was to survive. The fact that Anne’s diary also survived extinction is a happy miracle. The greatest stress for the denizens of the secret hiding place was the constant fear of being found. Burglars nearly found their way to the annex on more than one occasion, causing great trepidation among its inhabitants. In fact, any unusual noise or unexpected visitor below was cause for alarm. When the bell rings one evening without reason Anne “turned white at once, got a tummy-ache and heart palpitations, all from fear.” Anne suffers terrible dreams on the heels of such events. In one recurring dream, she says, “they come and take us away at night.” Anne sees the annex as an island in the midst of so much chaos, but her dreams foreshadow a darker time when danger will engulf their safe refuge. For over two years Anne and her seven companions survive the perils of exposure, but the fate Anne believed was inevitable came to pass when they were finally discovered, arrested, and sent to concentration camps. Those two years spent in hiding were filled with hardship and suffering. Anne and her family endured deprivations from food to light to fresh air. Frequent illnesses made captivity even more stifling. Food especially preoccupied their minds since faltering rations and decaying stores of fruit, meat, and vegetables confronted them three times a day. Anne and her cohort obtain food through coupons and ration cards, and purchases made on the black market. The economic effects of the war on the Dutch trickle down to affect the secret annex, too. What may seem like small losses such as diseased potatoes or days without butter are enough to turn the whole annex into a “tedious existence.” Light was used at a
bare minimum. When Anne begs her father to light the candle during a particularly treacherous air raid, the usually doting father refuses until Anne’s mother intervenes. Coal runs out quickly, leaving the annex colder than before. Illness, too, plagues Anne, as she must contort herself uncomfortably to avoid being heard. “It’s wretched to be ill here,” she said, “When I wanted to cough—one, two, three—I crawled under the blankets and tried to stifle the noise.” Yet everyone did survive the lack of proper food, lack of light and heat, and sickness. Perhaps for Anne, especially, the deprivation of fresh air and sunlight was almost insurmountable. The youngest member of the annex, Anne had to survive the same fears and privations as her roommates while also going through puberty under their watchful eyes. Had Anne not been required to escape into anonymity with her family, her tense relationship with her mother, which brought out in Anne a caustic, sometimes cruel reaction, may not have been so severe. While Anne felt spring blooming inside of her, she was captive to the endless winter of the secret annex. Anne writes in her diary that she can hardly remember the girl she once was before she met her fate in the secret annex. The girl she was would not have survived what Anne endures in hiding. Anne says, “I hear nothing but this sort of talk the whole day long, invasion and nothing but invasion, arguments about suffering from hunger, dying, bombs, fire extinguishers, sleeping bags, Jewish vouchers, poisonous gases, etc. etc.” The constant chatter in the annex revolves around these issues of life and death. Gone are the days of schoolboy crushes and bantering with teachers. In hiding, Anne grapples with the serious business of survival on a daily basis. Anne’s diary is one of the most widely read firstperson accounts of the Holocaust. For decades her voice has been a resounding reminder of the cruelties inflicted on Jewish people during World War II. Miep Gies, one of Otto Frank’s devoted employees who aided their survival while they hid, collected Anne’s diary after she and her family were removed to concentration camps. Anne’s voice has endured even her own death, and the millions of people who continue to read her words are a testament to her survival. Jeana Hrepich
The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklinâ•…â•… 459
Franklin, Benjaminâ•… The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklinâ•… (1791, 1818, 1868)
The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, one of the most famous autobiographies in literature, was first published in French in 1791, the year after Franklin’s death. This version was incomplete. Franklin’s grandson published a more complete version in 1818. In 1868 John Bigelow purchased the original manuscript and published the entire work. Bigelow’s edition is the one usually used for later reprints. The Autobiography is divided into four parts. The first part, which was written for Franklin’s son William, was composed in 1771. The second part is introduced by a memo from Franklin and was written in the early 1780s. Here he says that the first section contained family stories and that the second was written for public consumption. In this section Franklin details his plan to achieve moral perfection. The third part begins with a note from Franklin saying that he has lost many of his papers in the Revolutionary War, but some were saved. Among these are his observations on history and yearly comments on his life. This section was written in 1778. The 1818 edition ends here. Franklin wrote part 4 the year of his death and it describes his efforts in England on behalf of the colonies in 1757. While Franklin’s autobiography does not cover the Revolutionary War period, it does provide perspectives that have survived Franklin himself and are just as relevant today as they were when he wrote them. The book, with its development of Franklin’s thoughts on work, family, success, education, religion, and other themes, is a delightful read. Suanna H. Davis
Family in The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin
The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin begins with a clear emphasis on family; the first words in the book are “Dear Son.” In the letter, Benjamin Franklin proposes to acquaint his son William with the particulars of his life, offering it as an example for others to emulate. He begins by detailing anecdotes of his ancestors, thus establishing the theme of family in the work.
Franklin reminds his son of the search made for their remaining family in Ecton, Northamptonshire. Here the Franklin family had lived since at least 1555, according to the church registers, which began then. In his readings, Franklin, who was the youngest son of 17 children, discovered that he was the youngest son of the youngest son for five generations. Franklin continues, examining other common family traits. He writes that Josiah, his father, apprenticed under his brother John, just as Franklin later apprenticed under his brother. Thomas, the eldest uncle, becoming a scrivener and a political power in the county; Franklin notes the similarities between Thomas’s life and his own. The family tie-ins continue. Franklin was named after his uncle Benjamin, who was “an ingenious man” (8) and when Franklin was young his uncle lived in their home in Boston for several years. Franklin shows his regard for his uncle by mentioning that when pamphlets Benjamin had purchased and subsequently sold were brought to his notice after his uncle’s death, Franklin bought them. Franklin develops his discussion of family with his father who married young and had three children when he moved to New England. There Josiah had another four children. After his first wife died, Josiah married Franklin’s mother, Abiah Folger, who Franklin introduces as the daughter of one of New England’s first settlers. His parents had another 10 children together. While family is a positive theme in the book, Franklin does not attempt to minimize problems within his family. Franklin recounts that he was sent to work for his brother James, a printer. This did not work out well and Franklin is blunt in saying that his brother often beat him. When Franklin was able to leave his apprenticeship, he did so. After several years he came home and showed off, which made his brother angry. Despite their mother’s pleadings, the two did not reconcile. But 10 years later they re-established relations as James was dying, and he requested that Franklin raise his son and establish him in printing, which Franklin did. As part of his development of the theme of family within his autobiography, Franklin writes of his courtship of Miss Read, who later became his wife.
460â•…â•… Franklin, Benjamin When Franklin first arrived in Philadelphia he met and stayed with the Read family. He and Miss Read courted, but Franklin left on a business trip. Gone for months he wrote only one letter, telling her he did not know when he would return. In response to this, and at the urging of her mother, Miss Read married someone else. Franklin makes it clear that Miss Read was right to not wait for him, mentioning among other things that he made advances to another woman while in England. Upon the death of Miss Read’s husband, Franklin and Miss Read were married. Franklin says she was cheerful, industrious, and frugal and that they were happy together. Even though Franklin begins the autobiography with a letter to his son and it is purportedly written to him, Franklin discusses William’s experiences throughout the book, describing his trip with Franklin researching ancestors, replacing Franklin as a clerk for the assembly, serving in the war against Canada, procuring for Braddock’s army, and touring England with Franklin. This is part of the development of the family theme, incorporating his son’s history into that of the rest of the relations. Franklin ends the third section of his autobiography by describing his tour of London with his son. Thus the theme of family, focused as it is on his son, comes full circle. In the 1818 version, published by his grandson, this is the end of the book. Franklin offered his autobiography as an example for others to follow, and his emphasis on family within the book says that family should be valued. Suanna H. Davis
Success in The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin
On the very first page of his autobiography, Benjamin Franklin begins to develop the theme of success when he writes that, since he has gone from being poor and unknown to being well off and famous, since he has had a happy life, he can offer himself as an example of success for others to imitate. Franklin does not limit his discussion of success to business, but also develops the theme of success through a description of his marriage, civic projects, and political career. Franklin was successful in his career. Though he was originally slated to enter the church and
then worked with his father as a tallow-chandler, he was eventually apprenticed to his brother to be a printer. Franklin worked hard and learned the trade of printer well. He also used his time with the educated men of Boston to learn to discuss and to write persuasively. This served him well later in life when he wanted to make changes and found that he could make them happen through his writing. Franklin makes clear that his success as an apprentice was not limited simply to his learning a trade. When Franklin left his brother, he ended up in Philadelphia working for another printer. Franklin left the printer’s employ and worked in England for a while as a printer. He then returned to Philadelphia as a store clerk. He was happy in the work and had financial success until the death of the owner, at which time he went back to work for the printer as a manager in his printing shop, teaching the trade to the workers who had been hired. It was clear that he would soon work himself out of a job, and Franklin determined once again to set up his own printing house. Eventually Franklin was able to start his business through the generosity of two friends. He was so successful in his business that he was able to form partnerships in which junior partners took his printing apparatus and set up shops in other cities throughout the colonies and then bought out his majority interest from their earnings. The theme of success in the work is clearly developed through Franklin’s success in business. Franklin also describes his success in marriage. He courted Miss Read of Philadelphia successfully, but when he left for England and did not return soon, she married someone else. Her first marriage was unhappy, and when her husband died, she married Franklin. She was, he writes, a “good and faithful helpmate,” who helped him in the business and ran the household. They worked to make each other happy and succeeded in that, too. Franklin then discusses his successes in civic projects. He helped create a subscription library that was so successful it eventually became Philadelphia’s first public library. Also he helped form the Union Fire Company, Philadelphia’s first fire company. He used his persuasive skills as a writer to bring about a change in the constabulary and helped obtain public and private funding for a hospital. He made
The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklinâ•…â•… 461 Philadelphia more livable by persuading the government to pave and light the streets. In all these civic projects he was a success, and his success was a boon to his adopted city as well. Another success that Franklin mentions is as a political figure. He became a clerk of the General Assembly, writing a paper arguing for the creation of a militia, making him a key figure in its establishment. Then he decided an academy was needed and encouraged his friends and the public to participate and set one up. He became so financially successful that he thought to retire, but the public “laid hold” of him and he was immersed in the civil government. He became an alderman and a burgess and tried being a justice of the peace. He was chosen to be a member of the Royal Society on account of his scientific experiments. By that time, Franklin says, he no longer had need of governors’ favors because he was a success on his own. Franklin wrote The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin partially because friends recommended that he share his story in order to influence youth so that they might be as successful as he was. Thus the impetus behind the presentation of the autobiography makes clear the theme of success that Franklin developed throughout the book. Suanna H. Davis
Work in The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin
One of the main themes in The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin is work, which can be evidenced by the fact that Franklin uses the words “work” and “business” more than 100 times each within the text. In introducing people in his narrative, Franklin focuses often on their occupation. Of his own family, Franklin says that a smith’s business was their source of sustenance. He mentions that his grandfather and his three younger sons were all dyers and that the older one was a smith who became a scrivener. Franklin presents these men to posterity by the business each was engaged in. The theme of work is also apparent when Franklin discusses his own evolving work situation in great detail. While his family initially expected him to serve in the church, Franklin was soon at home
working with his father. Since Franklin did not wish to follow in his father’s occupational footsteps, he was introduced to various trades. Franklin says that he found his trade through his love for reading and he was then apprenticed to his brother as a printer. He became a printer, worked as a store clerk for a time, returned to printing, and eventually became a business owner of a printing house and a stationer’s store. Franklin develops his theme of work through discussion of its difficulties and rewards. His apprenticeship was unpleasant because James was a harsh master. It was also pleasant, because Franklin liked the work, met other readers, and was able to advance his education. His work in Watt’s printing house in England brought difficulties, when the composers insisted that he contribute to their alcohol purchases. He resisted and all his work was undone whenever he was not looking. When he gave in and paid, his experience and his clear head—he did not indulge in drinking—brought him a better position in the company. In developing the positive and negative aspects of work, Franklin describes some of his employers. Franklin spends a few paragraphs on the character of one whom he admired as a good businessman. Denham was a store owner and Franklin worked as his clerk. They roomed together and, until Denham died, he served as Franklin’s adviser. Franklin enjoyed his work with Denham and it was financially renumerative, even after Denham’s death, because Denham included Franklin in his will. Franklin then gives a negative example of an employer in his next boss, Keimer. Keimer had hired several people, promising to teach them the trade of printer, but Keimer did not know the printing trade. Eventually he hired Franklin to manage his printing house. Franklin quickly realized that if he taught Keimer’s employees how to do their work, he would be out of a job, but he taught them and further straightened out the business. Keimer forced a public quarrel with Franklin, and Franklin’s work for him ended after little more than six months. The positive and negative aspects of work continue to be detailed through Franklin’s discussions of partners. At one point, a man Franklin had taught proposed that they go into business together. This
462â•…â•… Frost, Robert turned out to be a bad idea, because the man drank and Franklin was the only one caring for the business. Franklin eventually bought him out. Another potential partner rejected Franklin’s proposal with scorn, which was good, because he lived above his means and soon ran his business into the ground. Another example of the negative aspects of work is developed through Franklin’s descriptions of other printers. He described his former boss Keimer as a compositor, not a pressman. Eventually Keimer sold his printing house to pay his debtors. Franklin labels Bradford, another printer, illiterate and not bred to the work. Bradford, who was also the postmaster for a time, refused to send Franklin’s papers by the post and Franklin had to resort to bribing the carriers. Franklin details the positive aspects of work by describing his own experience as an employer. Franklin was not only industrious, but he rewarded his employees who showed industry as well. He promoted these workers, sending them throughout the colonies in joint ventures. Due to their own diligence, they were often able to buy Franklin out, thus becoming the sole proprietors of their own printing houses. In a clear development of the theme of work, Franklin says that not only was he a hard worker, but he also made this obvious to those around him by not engaging in leisure pursuits other than reading, which was a part of his business. He states that since industry, together with frugality, enabled him to pay off his debts and acquire his fortune, anyone who wants to be a businessman should follow his model. Suanna H. Davis
Frost, Robertâ•… poemsâ•… (1874–1963)
Robert Frost is one of the most important American poets of the 20th century. His poems, many of which chronicle the day-to-day tasks related to country living, are reminiscent of a quieter, simpler time in history. Though he wrote poetry the average man could relate to and understand, Frost’s work cannot be considered simplistic. In fact, many readers have discovered profound, symbolic meanings deep within his words. Portraying both the joys and hardships of rural life, Frost paid careful attention to rhyming pat-
terns and diction. Not only could the average reader understand his works, but also they were especially appreciated when read aloud. His poems are full of imagery, as he paints vivid pictures of stages of life, nature, isolation, and work. Frost was no stranger to hardship. Born in 1874, he studied at Harvard and Dartmouth but never earned a degree, and worked a number of odd jobs before becoming an unsuccessful farmer and eventually a teacher. His later years were marked by tragedy. Three of his children passed away, including one son who committed suicide. Additionally, one of his daughters suffered from mental illness. In spite or perhaps because of these tragedies, he remained a productive poet, receiving honorary degrees and accolades during his lifetime, including the honor of reading one of his poems at the inauguration of President John F. Kennedy. He died in 1963. Though he composed poems throughout his adult life, it is his earlier works which are most familiar. Ultimately, it is the accessibility of Frost’s poetry—that he wrote with the common man in mind—that will continue to keep him one of the best-loved poets of his generation. Erin Brescia
Isolation in the poetry of Robert Frost
Isolation is frequently alluded to in many of Robert Frost’s poems. In some, it is something to be enjoyed, or even savored, while in others it is considered unnatural and unnecessary. In his poem, “Mending Wall,” two neighbors make their yearly trip to the wall that joins their property in order to make improvements. Between the elements and hunters, the wall becomes damaged over each year. The narrator gives no indication that he and his neighbor spend time together aside from this project, but every year they “meet to walk the line and set the wall between us once again” (l. 13–14). The narrator is not entirely sure that this wall is necessary. They have no animals between them to wander in each other’s yards; however, his neighbor merely replies: “good fences make good neighbors” (l. 27). The message he sends here is that as long as each individual keeps to himself, they will remain friends. The narrator questions his neighbor’s phi-
poemsâ•…â•… 463 losophy. As long as no harm will come to their property, why would they want to keep the other out? He goes so far as to suggest that this theory is antiquated, calling it “his father’s saying.” Because the narrator’s neighbor was raised on the idea that fences are important, he will never stray from his father’s counsel. The narrator notes that even nature does not promote fences—that the “frozen ground” adjusts the boulders so that they shift from one another and are no longer effective. Symbolically, Frost is saying that men are not always meant to be isolated from one another; interaction with others is a vital part of living. The irony is that they will continue to keep the wall between them as they work together to mend it. In another poem, however, Frost praises the idea of isolation as it relates to hard work. In “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening,” he speaks of a man on an assignment. He is traveling alone in the woods with his horse. In this case, the owner of the property is not nearby but lives in town. The man pauses for a moment to enjoy his surroundings as the woods around him fill with snow. Again, nature asserts the idea that isolation is unnatural when the horse shakes his harness “to ask if there is some mistake” (l. 10). The horse realizes it is more customary to stop when they reach a farmhouse and other people, rather than in the middle of the forest while it is snowing. The man, however, enjoys this moment of solitude. He refers to the woods as “lovely, dark and deep” (l. 13). They seem an eternal abyss; a place he is content to stay awhile if not for his impending task. Despite the fact that he enjoys the isolation and the quiet forest, he has “promises to keep” (l. 14). These promises will undoubtedly return him to civilization. His surroundings could also reflect that he is in the “winter,” or the final stages, of his life and that he is ready to rest and enjoy the isolation. “The Road Not Taken,” full of symbolism concerning the choices one must make in life, also quietly alludes to one key idea concerning isolation: One must make these choices alone. The narrator is in the forest with two paths before him. He knows he must choose one road to take, and that this choice will alter the course of his life. There is no one avail-
able to offer an opinion; no one to ask. The decision is entirely his own. Nature may not promote the idea of isolation, but when faced with important choices, Frost suggests, it is absolutely necessary. It is the individual who is responsible for his decisions; he should never rely on those around him to choose the path he is to take, as this could potentially lead to disaster. Isolation might be unnatural, but it is required by thinking people so that they may think for themselves. The idea of isolation in Frost’s poems has a threefold purpose: to remind readers to savor the quiet moments, to find solace in the company of others, and to remember that, in the end, one is entirely responsible for making his own existence worthwhile. Erin Brescia
Stages of Life in the poetry of Robert Frost
Robert Frost’s most famous poem, “The Road Not Taken,” has been used as the theme of many commencement addresses. It is most relevant for graduation exercises because of the idea of “choices.” Like the subject of the poem, students are often faced with important decisions after completing their degree. Frost eloquently notes these decisions by comparing them to paths in the wood. First, in making this decision, the subject is sorry that he “could not travel both” paths. Knowing what lay at the end of each road would undoubtedly help him make his choice, but this is impossible, just as it is impossible to predict the future. The narrator understands that the choice he is about to make regarding which path he travels will alter the course of his life. There are two roads: two paths that will lead to two entirely different outcomes. According to the narrator, the paths are “equal.” One path is not good and the other evil, one is not treacherous and the other easy; they are simply paths. Each path has been chosen by someone before him—someone with a choice to make. Though both paths are worn “about the same,” the narrator notices that one is less worn, and this becomes the “road less traveled.” As he looks back on his life, the narrator realizes that when it was time to make the choice, the path he chose “made all the difference.”
464â•…â•… Frost, Robert This poem is about decisions and the passage of time. A true “coming of age” poem, “The Road Not Taken” symbolically highlights the freedom one has to create his own destiny. Given the narrator’s “sigh,” the reader is unsure if the narrator is pleased with the road he traveled, or if he has made a mistake. While some take the right path, not everyone makes the appropriate choice. When reminiscing, there are those who wish their life had taken a different course. By then, however, it is too late. The choices made early in life have permanent outcomes, which is why symbolically, readers are encouraged to “choose wisely.” Like “The Road Not Taken,” Frost’s “Birches” presents an older narrator looking back on life. Here, the focus is on life’s hardships and their effects. The narrator is looking at the bent branches of a birch tree. He wishes to believe that they are bent because young boys have been swinging on them, but knows that this does not bend the branches “down to stay.” It is more probable that the branches are bent because of the ice storms they have weathered. Frost describes the icy winter morning and its picturesque beauty, though it is destroying the shape of the branches. When the storm is over, the sunlight causes the ice to melt and break. He describes their shattering as “such heaps of broken glass to sweep away” (l. 12). This is reminiscent of the pieces that are left to be picked up after a tragedy has occurred: the aftermath. What is important to note is that, though the branches are altered, they are not broken. What the narrator would prefer, however, is that the boy—left to his own entertaining devices—bent the branches by swinging on them. Frost describes how perfectly the boy would swing, learning the technique so as not to break them, until “not one was left for him to conquer” (l. 33). The narrator confesses that he, too, was once a swinger of birches, “and so I dream of going back to be” (l. 43). By admitting this, there seems to be a correlation between the ice storms that affect the branches and the hardships he has seen. Ultimately, he would like to return to a simpler time in life where he had the freedom to play in the woods as a boy. Even now, he wishes to climb the trunk and have the branches set him down again. He con-
cludes that there are worse things in life than being “a swinger of birches” (l. 70). In each of these poems, Frost discusses the various stages of life and the challenges they bring. First, there is the young boy without a care, one who can spend his days climbing trunks and swinging from trees. As he grows, he becomes the young man who must choose his course in life—knowing that his decision will alter him forever. Then, looking back, there is the old man who has endured the trials and hardships of living—who may or may not regret the path he has traveled, but would rather be a young boy with the freedom to swing on the branches from heaven and back to earth again. Erin Brescia
Work in the poetry of Robert Frost
One of the reasons Robert Frost’s poetry is enjoyed is his ability to capture the reality of everyday living in language that is accessible to the average reader. In essence, the subjects of Frost’s poems are everyday men and women doing ordinary, common things. The idea of work is mentioned in many ways throughout his various poems. Many times he speaks of specific chores and tools, while elsewhere he alludes to the effect work has on the common man. For instance, in his poem “Putting in the Seed,” he writes of the narrator’s passion for planting apple seeds in the spring. Though he knows that someone will stop by soon to fetch him for dinner, he almost dares them to try to pull him away from his work. In fact, he realizes that more than likely he who comes to fetch him will become caught up in his work as well: the “slave to a springtime passion for the earth” (l. 9). In this case, the work is pleasurable; the narrator enjoys planting seeds and watching them grow. Frost also refers to the satisfaction of work. In “The Pasture,” the narrator has a list of chores that must be accomplished. He plans to rake the leaves out of the pasture spring and check on a young calf. He encourages others to come with him because once the work is done, there are benefits to reap. For instance, after cleaning the pasture spring he may stay for a while “and wait to watch the water clear” (l. 3). In “The Tuft of Flowers,” Frost writes of how well it is that men work together. Whether or not
The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittmanâ•…â•… 465 it makes the job easier, or allows them to finish faster, the narrator has found a “spirit kindred” in the man who works alongside him. They work hard together, and, when they become weary, rest in the shade together. In the final stanza, the narrator tells his comrade that “men work together . . . whether they work together or apart” (l. 10). This alludes to the idea that everyone works together for the common good of man. Though they may not work on the same task, people who work are connected to one another, laboring toward a tangible goal. This satisfaction is what makes work bearable. In other poems, however, work is merely to be tolerated, something that must be done. In these poems, men are tired and overworked. Many times they find solace in nature and their surroundings. In “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening,” the narrator is a weary traveler, working his way toward his destination. Frost never mentions the purpose for this man’s journey, only that he has made a promise he must keep. At this point, he still has miles to go before he is able to rest, so he stops for a moment to enjoy the woods around him as they fill with snow. Here, the narrator knows that the task must be accomplished no matter his physical or mental state. The idea here is that there is time to rest when the job is finished. In Frost’s poetry, work is seen as having a profound effect on the common man. For many, work becomes a death sentence. Others are physically and mentally altered by the work they have done over the years. In “Birches” the narrator describes life as a “pathless wood” (l. 44), where one is required to make his own way through the cobwebs and the trees. The way is long and difficult and painful, and he is altered by it in the same way the birch trees are altered by the ice storm. In the winter, the branches are heavy with ice that bend the tree down to stay, just as the narrator, in the winter of his life, is bent from the work and hardships he endured. Because of this, he dreams of a simpler time and the ability to again be a “swinger of birches” (l. 41); a young man who, while he is out tending to the cows, still has the time and energy to play in the trees. Work is a complicated theme throughout Frost’s poetry, and his attitude toward it may never be fully understood. His poems, though, speak of the
realities of work: that sometimes it can be enjoyed, sometimes it is meant to be tolerated, that the physical proof of the accomplished task is something of which to be proud, and finally, if one is not careful, work can lead to an early grave. Erin Brescia
Gaines, Ernest J.â•… The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittmanâ•… (1971)
Ernest J. Gaines, a powerful contemporary AfricanAmerican writer from Louisiana, is best known for exploring the theme of heroism among disenfranchised and emasculated African-American men. His work has been compared to the work of William Faulkner, like Faulkner; Gaines created a mythical town, Bayonne, set in his birth state of Louisiana, where his characters face the trials and tribulations of being black. In their heroic quest for dignity and meaning, strong black women teach them the importance of small acts of heroism. In this fictional autobiography, Gaines represents the profound struggles of just such an indomitable black woman. This novel, remarkable for its innovations in form, established Gaines as a brilliant writer whose apparently simple, folk style of writing holds profound messages. In The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, Gaines, without abandoning his mission of exploring African-American male heroism, creates a remarkable female protagonist who transcends the traditional representations of black womanhood. Additionally, he explores the difficult and mine-ridden task of negotiating the contradictions inherent in the tensions between progress and regress that every person encounters as she charts out new paths in unfamiliar territories. A fictional autobiography narrated by the reclusive and reluctant 110-year-old Miss Jane Pittman, the autobiographical material is gleaned and edited by a persistent history teacher who does so in order to compile a folk history of black Americans between the years of emancipation and civil rights. The different voices of the community that Gaines heard, growing up on the porch of his paraplegic great aunt, Augusteen Jefferson, are brilliantly captured in a communal voice. This communal voice is perfect for telling
466â•…â•… Gaines, Ernest J. the individual story that is the life of the brave and ethical Miss Jane Pittman who, at the tender age of 10, has the profound insight that we cannot “let what happened yesterday stop us today.” Renamed Jane by a Union soldier from Ohio, after his own daughter Jane Brown, Miss Jane searches for the meaning of freedom as she carves out a life for herself as a free individual, a difficult task given the soul-depleting ideology of slavery that continues to enslave people’s minds. However, forced to rely at a very young age on only herself, Miss Jane constructs a belief system that grows out of her 110 years of life experience. Su Senapati
Community in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman
Ernest P. Gaines in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman reveals the strong communal bond of fellow responsibility that exists in the black community as he explores the problems of engendering AfricanAmerican leaders and the need for understanding between blacks and whites during important junctures in time. After the Emancipation Proclamation, the newly freed slaves charted out new paths and constructed new paradigms to improve their lives. However, the deep divide between blacks and whites and traditional and progressive ideas unleashed uncertainty and violence, making the reconstruction of the South a harrowing process. Progress was slow since racist ideology first had to be erased from both white and black consciousness for equitable laws to be created and transformed into social reality. To achieve this end, Gaines deems education, time, and community to be essential. Furthermore, Gaines’s unwavering belief in the black community’s ability to rise like the proverbial phoenix is revealed through the creation of his protagonist, Miss Jane Pittman, who from the age of 10 willingly abandons the security of the familiar to courageously tread uncharted territories. When Jimmy the chosen “One” is frustrated by his failure to inspire ex-slaves to join the Civil Rights movement, Miss Pittman reminds him that downtrodden and enslaved people need time to develop fortitude to recognize and fight their wretchedness and that it is not the individual leader that fails but rather the
community that succeeds. She tells Jimmy, “People and time bring forth leaders . . . leaders don’t bring forth people.” Moreover, so strong is Gaines’s faith in the community that he narrates the autobiography of the remarkable Miss Jane Pittman through the communal voice of African Americans. Miss Pittman’s belief that leaders evolve naturally from within the community over a period of time is validated by the examples of Big Laura, Ned Douglas, Jimmy Aaron, and finally Miss Jane Pittman herself. However, since community leaders seek radical change by teaching the disenfranchised to think for themselves, they are perceived as threats and killed by the powerful, only to be replaced by others who take on their roles or continue their progressive work. Big Laura, because of her size, strength, and quiet fortitude, innocuously slips into the role of leading two dozen freed slaves away from servitude, but while she succeeds in maintaining order within the traveling group she fails to stave off attacks by Confederate soldiers. Her orphaned, infant son, Ned, also grows up to be a leader, but he too is assassinated for daring to educate poor blacks. Nonetheless, when Ned is killed the work of educating blacks is continued: A school is built and children educated through the collective effort of the community. Yet his death creates such a vacuum and the community is so in need of a leader that when Jimmy is born, he is nominated as the “One.” But instead of spiritually leading the people, he leads them politically. But he too is assassinated and the 110–year-old Miss Pittman, who has shied away from leadership roles, openly defies Robert Samson and leads the protest march Jimmy had planned, becoming the wise icon of AfricanAmerican solidarity that Jimmy had envisioned. Thus the 10-year-old child Jane, who without any qualms took on the responsibility of protecting the infant Ned, bringing him to safety and mothering and raising him to be a leader, embodies not only the solidarity of the black community but also the heroic qualities of a new kind of leader for the community. However, while the bonds within the black community are strong and people nonchalantly and without fanfare take on responsibilities of caring for and nurturing those in need, the bonds with whites
The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittmanâ•…â•… 467 are nonexistent. The powerful white community is not only ignorant of the need to establish human bonds with former slaves but is also oblivious to the suffering it incurs for adopting and participating in racist ideology. For example, Robert Samson uses Verda sexually and denies the existence of his “half-nigger” son Timmy, even though Timmy is more like Robert than Robert’s legitimate son Tee Bob is. Although Tee Bob adores Timmy and the two are inseparable, Robert has no qualms about sending Timmy off the plantation even after the overseer Tom Joe has beaten Timmy cruelly and unjustly. The contradictions inherent in this ideology finally unravel in the fractured consciousness of Tee Bob who, unable to reconcile the apparent acceptability of being allowed to have a sexual relationship with the mulatto Mary Agnes LeFebre but not to love her or marry her, commits suicide. After Tee Bob’s suicide, all Robert is concerned about is taking revenge on the equally innocent Mary Agnes. Only Jules Reynard’s calm control and threat of exposure prevents Robert from taking vengeance. As Reynard and Miss Jane Pittman discuss the tragedy of Tee Bob’s suicide they realize that “he was bound to kill himself one day for our sins.” When Miss Pittman feels sorry for Tee Bob and says “Poor Tee Bob,” Reynard reminds her, “No, poor us,” exposing how everyone is a loser in a divided community. The fact that bonds of friendship do exist and can exist among people divided artificially along color lines is brought home by the hit man Albert Cluveau’s feeble attempts to protect Ned. Lacking the courage, wherewithal, and initiative needed to defy the orders of his powerful white employers, he feels compelled to reveal to Jane his orders to kill Ned. That communal bonds of friendship do exist among blacks and whites who live together and that such bonds are short-circuited by racist ideology that reduces communal bonds to the lowest common denominator of survival is also revealed by Cluveau’s clinical execution of unethical orders. Finally, the fact that economic wealth is not what determines the strength and health of an individual and her/his community is revealed when, at the end of the novel, the reader realizes that the childless, penniless orphan Miss Jane Pittman has more fam-
ily, love, and respect than the powerful plantation owner, Robert Samson, with all his wealth, progeny, and financially dependent ex-slaves. Su Senapati
Stages of Life in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman
The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman is divided into four discrete sections, War Years, Reconstruction, Plantation, and Quarter. These correspond with the stages of African-American history. Miss Jane Pittman’s life can be divided into five sections that may be explained using psychologist Abraham Maslow’s theory of hierarchy of needs and ethical development, a movement from a preoccupation with the self to the community. These stages of Miss Jane Pittman’s life are (1) Freedom March, (2) Raising Ned and Losing Ned, (3) Finding Love and Losing Love, (4) Recovery, (5) Community. During all the stages of her life, Miss Jane is preoccupied with responsibilities of survival and safety, but her self-respect, tenacity, ethical acumen, pragmatism, and ability to overcome challenges and solve problems, even linked to her sworn enemies, make her an unparalleled leader. During the first stage of her life, Miss Jane has no name, lineage, or history that defines her as a person, but she has a commodity value that translates into endless work. Once emancipated, her service value is removed and the market economy tries to destroy and dump the devalued commodity that was once a slave. Hunting and killing of freed slaves traveling north thus becomes a common phenomenon during Reconstruction. While the older slaves on the Bryant plantation prefer the familiarity of known hardships, and choose to stay behind, the younger ones, including Miss Jane, choose to leave and venture into unknown geographies. But every one of them, even the strong leader, Big Laura, is hunted down and brutally murdered; only child Jane and baby Ned survive. However, Jane’s recognizable life as a human begins before she is freed, when a Yankee soldier, Colonel Brown, names her Jane after his own daughter. Colonel Brown may be seen as an adoptive parent; although he does not provide any of the necessities an adoptive parent provides, he gives Jane
468â•…â•… Gaines, Ernest J. her name, thereby giving her social legitimacy. Her goal in journeying to Ohio is to locate her adoptive father, but when she does find him he does not recognize her, just as at birth the parent who has abandoned a child would not. Unfazed by the disappointment, she sets up a life where she is a parent and not a child and gives to Ned what she has never received, love, care, and respect. So the second stage of Miss Jane’s life as a freed slave is one of creating an instant family for the vulnerable, which includes herself. Miss Jane’s role as a mother to Ned gives her life immediate meaning and agency until Ned becomes an adult and carves out his life’s mission to empower his people and improve their living conditions. But he is forced to abandon his mission. After a brief sojourn to escape being killed, Ned returns, having transformed himself from Ned Brown to Ned Douglass after Frederick Douglass. Because of Jane’s nurturing Ned is able to quickly move to Maslow’s highest stage of ethical development, giving service to his community. But his empowering mission threatens the white-black social hierarchy in the South; like most noble leaders who initiate ethical change, he is brutally murdered. When hired killer Albert Cluveau kills Ned, Jane is furious and curses Cluveau, but soon after, she helps Cluveau’s daughters, refusing to withhold compassion even from her enemies. Having quelled her childhood and erotic stages of life to raise Ned, Jane has an opportunity to participate in the stage of erotic love after Ned’s departure. She falls in love with Joe Pittman, a highly independent, spirited horse breaker, who through sheer hard work has earned his release from economic bondage and taken to breaking wild horses, never to be beholden to another master because during slavery, while slaves were kept in literal and metaphorical chains, after slavery they were kept in social and economic chains. During this stage of finding love and losing love, which spans a decade, Jane is happy and content, but she has to surrender to the gender hierarchy of marriage. Joe Pittman’s age and wildness further exacerbate this hierarchy. When Joe meets Jane, he already has a family of two girls and is interested in Jane to some extent to find a surrogate mother for
his children. Insecure in her role as a spouse, Jane is afraid, a fear that manifests itself as an unexplainable paranoia of losing Joe. What she fears at this stage is separation anxiety, a fear felt by children and associated with the first stage of life. Being loved and being in love makes Jane vulnerable, much more so because she has not gone through the traditional first stage of life development, so her vulnerability leads her to bizarre acts that culminate in Joe’s death. Devastated though she is by Joe and Ned’s deaths, she keeps faith by keeping her hands busy as she enters the recovery stage of her life. She travels from one work establishment to another, preferring to work outside in the fields doing heavy labor rather than domestic chores, forming a philosophy that steady work, not too much work, and eating fish does a body good. She does not take sides, but works and rests and consoles those in need; but she can trust no one and nothing. Though old and wise and most suited to give the young direction, she does not lead, refusing even to speak of her long and eventful life to the history teacher who reconstructs her autobiography. A leader imposes a larger collective will on others and Jane is dead set against it, having chaffed under the heavy authority of slavery. She shies away from such a role, afraid it brings in the same master-slave paradigm of willful domination. When the young workers talk about the Civil Rights movement Dr. King has started she is skeptical, but when news of Jimmy’s death arrives she cannot stay uninvolved. Miss Jane’s biggest challenge has been finding out what to believe in, since familiarity and ubiquity make even the wrong appear right. So for Miss Pittman whose life is steeped in and shaped by injustices, believing in any kind of ideological movement is difficult. Experience has taught her to trust only the individual and make no generalizations about either race. Having lost so many black pioneers and potential leaders in her community, she cannot bear losing any more. She decides to lead. Because the people so badly want a messiah she becomes the messiah, but an earthly one, not a heavenly one. Her wisdom comes when she believes and relies on the validity of something outside of herself, something she has
The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittmanâ•…â•… 469 not learned to trust, for all she could ever trust or rely on was herself. Though frail and old, she leads the freedom march, although she knows the social rules and consequences: death. A former illiterate slave girl who has managed to live for 110 years by the sweat of her brow is not afraid of death, for she has not been afraid of life. Though she has not gone through the traditional stages of life development, she has lived her life through principles of work, ethics, courage, and compassion, which have made her life meaningful and important. Her journey from self to community is complete. Su Senapati
Work in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman
Since identity is intricately tied to the work a person does and since slaves had historically been separated from the product of their labor, Gaines pays particular attention to the theme of work. The protagonist of this story, Miss Jane Pittman, starts her work life at the age of 10 as a caretaker of children and later in life works as a field hand, a cook, and a laundress, but no matter what she does and no matter how menial the task, she does it well and this gives her the strength and courage to face all challenges in life. Born into slavery, all Jane knows is work; however, although her masters appropriate the product of her labor, they cannot appropriate the sense of self that she derives from her work. Ironically, when she is a child slave at the Bryant plantation, the added work of supplying water to exhausted soldiers passing by brings her in contact with Colonel Brown and the outside world, which in turn propels her on a journey of growth and enlightenment. A child herself, she without hesitation shoulders the responsibility of protecting, nurturing, and educating baby Ned, working endlessly to give what has been denied to her, an education. Her hard work pays off, for Ned grows up to be a marvelous human being who works to uplift the lives of the poor and the persecuted. Jane takes pride in her ability to work hard and earn adult wages on the Boone plantation. The foolishness of such pride, though excusable in a child, has disastrous consequences in adults as is revealed
by the Katie Nelson and Black Harriet incident on the Colonel Dye plantation. Such events where pride and competition at work cause havoc shape Jane’s work mantra for life, for as a former slave she must define the parameters of work, since excessive work has been the cause of injury and death for many a slave. She concludes, “Hard work can kill you, but plain, steady work killed nobody. Steady work and eating plenty of fish killed nobody.” Although work is empowering to the individual, not all work is empowering. Albert Cluveau, the hit man who kills Ned, spends the last 10 years of his life cowering in bed with his daughters, frightened of the “Chariots of Hell” that he is convinced are pursuing him. He has killed over a dozen men and for him killing is work, a way of making a living; but it is dirty work where the exercise of free will and ethical choice are willingly suspended, reducing the worker to subhuman levels and denying her/him any sense of self-worth. Furthermore, work is a concrete manifestation of the African-American contribution to the building of America; so, when newly freed slaves are riddled with confusion and have no place to go and rumblings of “go back to Africa” slogans are heard, Ned urges ex-slaves to question the validity of such statements, reminding them of the back-breaking work they have rendered: “This earth is yours . . . your people’s bones lays in it; it’s yours because their sweat and their blood done drenched this earth.” However, just physical labor is not enough as Ned reminds his students: “Working with your hands while the white man writes all the rules and laws will not better your lot,” for until the products of African–American labor are appropriated by AfricanAmerican laborers, they will be exploited and their sense of self-worth crippled. But Joe Pittman’s work ideology best summarizes the reason and importance of work. When Jane, frightened by dreams of Joe’s death, asks him to quit breaking horses for a living, he says that man is contracted to die but until he does, “he should do what he is good at doing” so that when he dies people can say, “He did good as he could.” Joe and Ned and Jimmy and many others like them know and recognize their calling in life, but for many Â�others such callings in life are closed because of
470â•…â•… Gaines, Ernest J. mind-numbing work that disallows their participation in the full spectrum of meaningful work. Thus Gaines in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, while showing the importance of work in the formation of identity, also advocates the need for better correspondence between the work one does and the product of that work for more holistic and human identities. Su Senapati
Gaines, Ernest J.â•… A Lesson before Dyingâ•… (1993)
A Lesson before Dying depicts rural Louisiana in the 1940s. A young African American named Jefferson has been accused of killing a shop owner during a robbery and is confined in prison. In fact, he was in the shop, accompanying two of his friends, when a violent argument between the two and the proprietor erupted, as a result of which the three fighting men shot each other to death. Jefferson’s courtappointed attorney compares him to an animal and calls him a “hog,” indicating that the defendant’s racial inferiority incapacitates him from acting with premeditation. These words do not influence the jury’s verdict, which is a death sentence, but they have a powerful effect on the black people in Jefferson’s community. The convict’s elderly godmother, Miss Emma, asks the teacher from the plantation school, Grant Wiggins, to talk to Jefferson and help him recover his sense of dignity. Initially, Grant’s visits to the prison are fruitless; he is reluctant to carry out his task, while Jefferson reacts to him with anger, impatience, or indifference. However, in the course of time, the young convict begins to appreciate the gestures of goodwill from the teacher and finds reassurance in the “lessons.” He discovers the meaning of his suffering. One of the central concerns in Gaines’s novel is the attachment to place and the extent to which the place and the time of a person’s birth determine the entire course of his or her later life. The narrator is Grant Wiggins; from his point of view, the necessity to live on the plantation where he had grown up and where he returned after his studies is literally a curse. In his native region, racism is the overwhelming historical legacy that underlies the existing
social relations. Racial segregation is a law, therefore it sustains, if not aggravates, the inequalities between white and black people. It is not surprising that Wiggins’s narrative is permeated by a sense of hopelessness mixed with anxiety. He is acutely aware there is no force that would change the present state of things. However, even if the external conditions cannot be improved, people’s consciousness can still be transformed. The death sentence for Jefferson provides an impetus for the entire community to acknowledge the value of sacrifice for the sake of others. It is not only Jefferson who learns an essential lesson, but also his kinsfolk from the plantation. This is primarily a lesson in dignity. On the one hand, A Lesson is a story of disillusionment and desperation, on the other, a tale of endurance and transformation. The narrative and thematic aspects of the novel combine the issues of alienation and community. The historical context highlights the problems of race and identity. Marek Paryz
Alienation in A Lesson before Dying
Grant Wiggins is a very ambivalent narrator because, on the one hand, he has been virtually forced by his aunt to become involved with Jefferson as a distinguished member of the black community, but on the other, he feels alienated from his kinfolk and even tries his best to minimize his affinity with them. His alienation is primarily caused by the determination to remain loyal to himself rather than to the group; furthermore, he considers his commitment to the community to be a possible threat to his personal integrity. He is an educated man, has been to other places, and has a chance to go to California; however, his unusual education and unique prospects make him even more vulnerable to the misery and hopelessness of the local existence. Unlike Wiggins, most community members do not think about alternatives for their lives for the simple reason that they do not have any. Grant’s alienation seems to be inseparable from his sense of entrapment. The fact that he returned to the plantation after his studies makes him feel as if he were caught in a vicious circle. The prospect of leaving Louisiana is delayed until Vivian has received a formal divorce. With the passing days,
A Lesson before Dyingâ•…â•… 471 Wiggins experiences his estrangement more and more painfully. He tends to think rather than act and, paradoxically, his incessant musings about a better life elsewhere possibly attest to his strong attachment to the native region, much stronger than he would wish to admit. The more actively he engages in the “lessons” with Jefferson, the more visibly he follows the community’s imperatives, but this does not alleviate his alienation. The point is that his acceptance of a responsibility imposed on him by the community is accompanied by a further separation from the community through a close acquaintance with another man on strictly personal terms. An important aspect of Grant’s alienation is his break with the church. He abandoned religious practice much earlier than the novel’s time of action, and his aunt has held a grudge against him because of that ever since. His detachment from religion is so severe that he gets irritated at the sound of songs and prayers reverberating in the church. His religious indifference is not only an expression of his personal choice, but also a manifestation of his distinction from others. He refuses to identify with the people who delude themselves that God will save them and that better times will come after death. A crucial episode in A Lesson is Wiggins’s confrontation with Reverend Ambrose. Grant suspects that the preacher, whom Tante Lou and Miss Emma trust unconditionally, wants to use him instrumentally. Indeed, Ambrose wants to persuade him that Jefferson should express his religious feelings before the execution so as to give his godmother a final consolation and to convince the community that his sacrifice will not be made in vain. Grant, who cares about Jefferson’s personal transformation and ignores the collective wishes or expectations, challenges Ambrose on the grounds that he does not respect the convict’s individual feelings and talks only about empty gestures. Whereas the theme of alienation evidently revolves around the dilemmas faced by Grant Wiggins, it is further developed in the presentation of Matthew Antoine, the local schoolteacher from the time of Grant’s youth. In the portrayal of this character, Gaines directly points to race as a factor behind individual alienation. Basically, Antoine is a Creole and as such he does not belong to the black
community, even though he devoted most of his life to African Americans. Antoine feels that he wasted his life, and now that he is an old man it is much too late to improve his situation. When he looks at Grant, he recognizes himself from his younger years, recognizes his own dreams and illusions. However, despite the odds, Grant still has a chance for a radical change in his life, which makes Antoine even more bitter and hateful. The theme of alienation plays a central role in Gaines’s novel as it facilitates the exploration of the problems arising at the intersections of individual and collective experience. Individual alienation results from, as much as it leads to, a variety of tensions between a person and a group. The analysis of such tensions provides a key to the understanding of social phenomena and historical circumstances. Marek Paryz
Community in A Lesson before Dying
In A Lesson before Dying, Ernest J. Gaines portrays two communities, black and white, and while he looks closely at the life of the former, he also explores the relations between both racial groups and pays special attention to important contrasts between them. The presentation of any community usually has a double focus: the place and the people. In Gaines’s novel, the people in the black community live in a special quarter of the plantation that has been allocated to them. Such an organization of the plantation area suggests that the situation of African Americans in the rural South has not changed visibly since the time of slavery, when black people occupied run-down buildings located at a distance from the plantation house. Although the black Americans described in the novel are obviously free, the place where they live imposes drastic limitations on them and reduces their possibilities to the minimum. They live with the awareness that they belong to an inferior social category. The central building in the quarter used by the black community is the church, which on weekdays houses a school. The school exists thanks to the dubious generosity of whites and possesses little means. There is only one qualified teacher, and the children of different ages have classes at the same time; therefore Wiggins, the teacher, relies on the
472â•…â•… Gaines, Ernest J. assistance of older students when he organizes the teaching of the youngest. The miserable school conditions make the children realize their low personal value to their society and deprive them of their aspirations. Despite this, the children at school not only acquire the basic skills, but they also learn to help one another and to act collectively. An important episode that shows the strengthening of bonds between the youngest members of the African-American community is their preparation of a nativity play for Christmas festivities. The centrality of the church in the black quarter points to the significance of religion in the community’s life. African Americans are poor people who bear humiliation on a daily basis; that is why they need spiritual support and religious consolation so much. The hope that there is a loving God makes their lives tolerable and saves them from utter resignation. Thus it is understandable that Reverend Ambrose, who is in charge of the church, is a figure of authority in the black people’s eyes and a natural leader of their community. He allows them to believe that the salvation of souls will be a compensation for the privations and humiliations of earthly life. Although he has doubts about his methods, and even about his calling, he realizes that he would fail his people completely if they knew about his incertitude; therefore he remains firm in his public role. It is important to notice that women play a crucial role in the African-American community. The main female characters in A Lesson are Miss Emma, Jefferson’s godmother, Tante Lou, Wiggins’s aunt, and Vivian, his beloved. Miss Emma and Tante Lou are both women of faith; in particular, they believe that Jefferson will regain his dignity and religious consciousness before the execution. The two women cooperate closely with Reverend Ambrose, who not only confirms them in their faith, but also suggests to them ways of influencing Grant and Jefferson. Although Miss Emma and Tante Lou are elderly and therefore delicate women, they know how to exert pressure on men and they instigate actions undertaken by men. This is particularly true of Grant who unwillingly yields to his aunt’s persuasion after she has blackmailed him. Miss Emma and Tante Lou function as mother figures for Jefferson and Grant, respectively. Even Vivian, though she is
Grant’s lover, offers him almost motherly support. It can be said that the black community in Gaines’s novel has certain matriarchal features. The significance of women in the black community accounts for the contrast with the strictly patriarchal white community. In general, in patriarchal societies all power resides in the hands of men. In A Lesson the white community is represented almost exclusively by male characters. Moreover, the white men portrayed by Gaines belong to the local elite, as they are landowners and entrepreneurs, or they hold various public offices. For example, Henri Pichot owns the plantation, Louis Rougnon runs a bank in a nearby town, and Sam Guidry is the sheriff. They stand for economic privilege and institutional power. Marek Paryz
Race in A Lesson before Dying
The relations between the communities of whites and blacks are determined by the difference in race and the resulting prejudices. The context evoked in the novel is characterized by a long history of racism, which has become a social norm. Even though A Lesson’s racism does not portray brutal or violent forms of racism, it inevitably highlights a variety of situations where white people have been involved with blacks. The best illustration of how whites assert their superiority and remind African Americans that they are seen as an inferior category of human is the episode when Grant comes to Mr. Pichot’s house and has to wait in the kitchen for more than two hours before the host kindly meets him. In general, when a black person wants to be treated favorably by whites, he should speak humbly and avoid looking white people straight in the eyes. White people control African Americans by means of certain oppressive measures, sanctioned by the law; indeed, Jefferson’s punishment for a crime he did not commit is the most striking example of racial oppression. Gaines presents the young convict as a scapegoat, in other words, a man who is punished mercilessly, even though he does not bear any guilt. The mechanism of scapegoating manifests itself in relations between individuals as well as between groups, such as national or ethnic communities; Gaines is interested in the latter case.
One Hundred Years of Solitudeâ•…â•… 473 The identification and punishment of a scapegoat is a symbolic reminder of who exercises power and who yields to it. The sentence for Jefferson serves as a warning for his kinfolk that it is white people who make the laws and that anyone who tries to undermine such an order will be punished most relentlessly. The sacrifice of a scapegoat has symbolic significance for the oppressed group. It not only forces them to admit their powerlessness, but also strengthens their solidarity in the face of external hostility. The inability to think outside racial stereotypes has a dehumanizing effect on both blacks and whites. African Americans tend to look at themselves through the prism of white people’s contemptuous view of them; this is why Jefferson begins to think of himself as an animal-like being after he has been called a “hog.” When Grant resumes the “lessons” with Jefferson, the young prisoner, in the beginning, keeps saying that he behaves in certain ways because this is how animals behave. In a sense, albeit profoundly disturbed by having been compared to an animal, Jefferson apparently tries to confirm that the white man in court was right. While the dehumanization of blacks is caused by the overwhelming impact of white people’s negative perceptions of them, the whites also become dehumanized as a consequence of their inability to renounce racial prejudices. Essentially, they cease to experience certain human emotions, most of all empathy. They become inconsiderate and heartless; for instance, several prominent white men, who talk to Wiggins at Pichot’s place, make bets whether the teacher will manage to elicit any positive change in Jefferson. The fact that African Americans assess their personal value and collective potential in the light of white people’s prejudices accounts for the psychological mechanism of self-hatred. Individual selfhatred is inseparable from the hatred a person feels for his ethnic group. In A Lesson, Jefferson experiences powerful negative emotions toward himself, because he has been deprived of his personal dignity. With Wiggins’s support, he eventually recovers his sense of selfhood and accepts his ethnic identity. However, Wiggins himself is not completely free from the feeling of self-hatred, as he lives with a
painful awareness of how little he will ever achieve as a black man in spite of his education. There is also Matthew Antoine, Grant’s former Creole teacher, a very embittered man, for whom the very sight of black people on the plantation exacerbates his sense of downright failure. White people and black people are neighbors, but in fact they inhabit separate worlds. However, although the racial divide runs deep, goodwill helps to overcome it. During his visits to the prison, Wiggins becomes acquainted with a young deputy named Paul, who supports the African-American cause. Paul sympathizes with Jefferson and offers assistance to Grant. Individuals may discover in themselves the power to remove racial barriers, but in the universe of Gaines’s novel it is a rather uncommon gift. Marek Paryz
García Márquez, Gabrielâ•… One Hundred Years of Solitudeâ•… (1967)
One Hundred Years of Solitude, published in Spanish in 1967 and written by Colombian Nobel Prize winner Gabriel García Márquez, recounts the history of the Buendías who establish an imaginary Latin American community, Macondo. While Macondo is initially a utopia, it devolves until its annihilation, just as the last of the Buendía line is discovering the true nature of his origins. In between, generations of Buendías experience challenges that offer a pessimistic critique of Latin American civilization. The plot’s circular structure is complicated by the recycling of characters’ names, the confusion of incestuous relationships, and the blending of magic and reality, which portray Latin America as self-destructive and insular. The tale also references historical events affecting the region. From the questionable influence of technology, seen in the inventions introduced by Melquíades and the Gypsies, to the arrival of the banana company, which mimics the scandal of the United Fruit Company, it is clear that contact with the outside world contributes to Macondo’s problems and, by extension, those of Latin America. This masterpiece shares themes of other boom novels, avant-garde works written during Latin
474â•…â•… García Márquez, Gabriel America’s 20th-century literary explosion. Among these themes are family and community, memory and history, reality and magic. Its complex structure parallels the complexity of Latin American civilization. Its many layers—family, community, nation, region—provide insight into a culture colored by contrasts and conflicts and one that seems eternally doomed to repeat its mistakes. Anne Massey
Community in One Hundred Years of Solitude
Communities define themselves through shared interests, goals, or values and by the manner in which the group distinguishes itself from outside influences. Macondo, although a fictional village, serves as a model for examining the processes whereby Latin American communities define themselves. To accomplish this, the narrative traces Macondo’s history from its founding by the Buendías to its destruction by the apparently unavoidable winds of eternal return, a concept in which events, although appearing to move forward, destructively revert to their origins. Macondo represents a community sharing an interest in progress but ultimately doomed to fail in the face of internal and external forces. At first, Macondo’s progress appears to be deterred primarily by outside influences. The village begins as an apparent utopia with founder José Arcadio Buendía arranging the homes so that all have equal sun and river access, but this spirit of social initiative ends with the fever of invention. The fever, spawned by interactions with the Gypsies, outsiders who thrill to technological marvels—such as magnets and ice—instills in José Arcadio a desire to move Macondo to a place more accessible to science. Only intervention by his wife, Ursula, prevents the move. Another outside threat seems linked with the arrivals of Visitación and Rebecca. Shortly after their appearance in the community, Macondo begins to suffer from a plague of insomnia, an illness in which its sleepless victims forget everything, including the memories of their own identities. Unable to fall asleep, the villagers tell stories and plan strategies to compensate for their failing memories. This threat would have destroyed the community
except for a magical potion provided by the wise Melquíades. Two final outside entities influence Macondo: the federal government and the banana exporters. Government interference includes tampering with ballot boxes and involvement in the war between Liberals and Conservatives. The corruption and the futility of the violence threaten Macondo. Even Colonel Aureliano Buendía, an active military leader, eventually becomes “weary of the uncertainty of the vicious cycle of the eternal war that always found him in the same place but always older, wearier, even more in the position of not knowing why, or how, or even when.” The banana company brings its own changes of order, entering Macondo in a “tumultuous and intemperate invasion.” Eventually, the government and the banana company conspire against the village, massacring thousands when the banana company workers strike. However, outside influences are not entirely to blame for Macondo’s demise; issues within the community create havoc as well. Key among these is the incestuous relationship of its founding family, symbolized by the confusing and repetitious use of proper names for the Buendía offspring and predicted from Macondo’s inception as the cause of future problems. Throughout, various characters fear that such relationships will produce children with pigs’ tails, an indication of the inappropriate nature of these unions. Jealousy and disputes over behavior divide the community as well. For instance, when both Amaranta and Rebecca fall in love with Pietro Crespi, the girls enter a complex cat-and-mouse game that ends only when Rebecca marries the son of Macondo’s founder and his wife Ursula. However, Ursula, considering the marriage disrespectful, as the adopted Rebecca and her new husband have been raised as siblings, forbids the couple from entering her home again. Fernanda, who has married into the Buendía family, considers Macondo’s citizens beneath her social standing and separates herself and her family from the community at large. Representative of this posture are the closed windows of her home and the gold chamber pots bearing her family crest. Despite Macondo’s auspicious beginnings, in the end both community and outside influences erode
One Hundred Years of Solitudeâ•…â•… 475 the utopia envisioned by the founders. The community is abandoned by its inhabitants; following the banana company massacre Macondo decays under the persistent, drenching rains; the last of the Buendía line is born with a pig’s tail, suggesting a return to more primitive beginnings; and finally the annihilating winds begin to blow and the alpha and omega of Macondo’s existence collide. To the extent that Macondo mimics 20th-century Latin American communities, the novel describes internal and external forces that create or exacerbate a myriad of problems in the region, including: failure to understand and to utilize technology effectively, a regional identity crisis, government-sponsored violence, corruption in international business dealings, an inability to cope with social issues and class disparities, and an isolationist perspective that prevents Latin America from proactively seeking and engaging in solutions. Anne Massey
Fate in One Hundred Years of Solitude
Eternal return is a view of events in which history and time are perceived as repetitious processes that doom society to revert back to its origins without ever progressing. This concept is pervasive throughout One Hundred Years of Solitude as the novel recounts the history of Macondo from its founding to its annihilation, a destruction that coincides with a potential rebirth as the last of the Buendías seeks to uncover the secrets of his personal and communal past. However, at the exact moment that these origins are to be revealed, destructive forces prevail, the town is swept away in a windstorm, and the opportunity to revitalize the community through a new beginning is lost. Instead, Macondo, and by implication Latin America, is fated to repeat its past, unaware that it is merely participating in a new destructive cycle. With the recollection of past mistakes erased by the storm, the missteps of history will inevitably lead yet again to the community’s complete eradication. Specific details and scenes support this pessimistic view. The repetition of identical or similar names—Aureliano, Arcadio, Aureliano José, Aureliano Segundo, José Arcadio Segundo, etc.—over the course of generations reflects the repetition of
eternal return. Moreover, such repetition creates confusion as characters and events overlap. This repetition and confusion, a destruction of logical order, are microcosms of the larger pattern; each generation, a cycle unto itself, mirrors the creation, decay, and destruction seen in the history of Macondo as a whole. Melquíades’s character undergoes a similar cycle. The Gypsy initially appears able to evade aging and death. In fact, José Arcadio Buendía believes that Melquíades has brought eternal life to the entire community with the daguerreotype. The community’s patriarch observes that the people of Macondo begin to wear away, but their images are forever preserved. Although Melquíades may symbolize eternal life and even declares that he has discovered immortality, shortly after this declaration, he is discovered drowned. José Arcadio Buendía resists burying his friend but is forced to do so as the body begins to decompose in the inevitable cycle of creation-decay-death. Macondo’s founder, José Arcadio Buendía, has numerous experiences related to the cyclical nature of time. He believes Monday continuously repeats itself and grows violent trying to escape the cycle. He laments the breaking of the time machine, a mechanism that might have permitted escape from the eternal repetition and spends time trying to find concrete evidence of the passage of time. His family, overwhelmed by his violent behavior, decides to tie him to a tree, where he is all but forgotten. The life of this community patriarch, a would-be inventor himself, mimics the process of eternal return. At the start of his imprisonment, Colonel Aureliano Buendía has a moment of déjà vu, and later he expresses his weariness over the eternal war in which nothing changes except his own aging. He even creates his own symbolic cycle, molding golden fishes only to melt them down again. When Ursula, the community matriarch, sees that the Gypsies no longer bring their inventions to Macondo, she fears the end of the world. Later, she observes that time seems to be working in reverse, and when she goes blind, she realizes that every day the family repeats the same words and actions. Finally, she dies after devolving into fetal form. Fernanda, who takes over the family’s care in the midst of Ursula’s
476â•…â•… García Márquez, Gabriel decline, imposes her parents’ norms on the household, returning to the past. And, despite her efforts at cleanliness and order, the house is overtaken by lizards, rodents, ants, and moss; the structure itself begins to revert back to a primeval state. When Amaranta Ursula, great-great-granddaughter of Macondo’s founders, herself attempts to reorganize the house, her efforts fail. The destructive circle of time continues as she and her nephew make love amid the sounds of Macondo’s ghosts trying to stave off creation’s inevitable entropy. Indeed, their love ends when Amaranta dies, having repeated family history by giving birth to a child with a pig’s tail. Shortly after Amaranta’s death, Macondo is blown away by the winds of fate. This ending, foretold by the history of prior Buendía generations, depicts both the futility and fatality faced by an insular Latin America. Any community unable to recognize and to break the constraints of its own historical cycle and intrinsic patterns of behavior is doomed not only to repeat the past but also to be eternally destroyed by it. Anne Massey
Memory in One Hundred Years of Solitude
Memory in One Hundred Years of Solitude functions, or malfunctions, simultaneously on two planes— individual and collective recall. From beginning to end, recollection and its opposition, forgetting, point to the insufficiency of familial ties and societal connection in the face of Latin American political corruption and the economic reality of poverty. The novel’s opening—Colonel Aureliano Buendía’s standing before a firing squad and remembering his father’s taking him to discover ice—segues into a description of the idyllic beginnings of Macondo and the Buendía family. This connection between pleasant memory and death demonstrates the inadequacy of familial and societal bonds in the face of unjust political manipulations. The utopia of the colonel’s youth will not withstand the decay brought about by political contamination. Indeed, early in the novel all efforts to manipulate memory for individual or community benefit fail. The Gypsies, who introduce a machine to make people forget bad memories, so confuse the community that the citizens of Macondo become lost
in their own streets. When faced with the illness of insomnia that destroys memory, both José Arcadio Buendía and his son unsuccessfully attempt to fend off complete erasure of past events with various inventions, including a machine designed to aid in recall. In the end, only through the magic of Melquíades is the community rescued and memory restored. Eventually, memory fades, dominated by the slow invasion of forgetting. Perhaps the most extreme example of forgetting is the massacre engineered by the government and the banana company during a strike by the company’s workers. Three thousand people are gunned down in the town square, but afterward no one recalls the event except José Aureliano Segundo and the boy he rescued from the mob. In fact, José Aureliano Segundo can find no evidence of the massacre, and when the boy attempts to force the people of Macondo to recall the gruesome day, he is written off as insane. Here, the failure of collective memory serves as a metaphor for the community’s inability to confront the political abuse found in much of Latin American history as well as its failure to address economic manipulation by nations outside of Latin America, in particular the United States. Over time, memory in the novel evolves into nostalgia, recollection colored by a longing for the unattainable. Nostalgia heightens the sense that Latin America’s societal bonds are insufficient mechanisms for resolving conflicts. For instance, upon returning from the war, Colonel Aureliano Buendía, feeling trapped by nostalgia, destroys all evidence of his past and attempts suicide. Afterward, lauded as a martyr for his suicide attempt by fickle followers who accuse him of selling out the war effort for personal gain while honoring him for rejecting the Presidential Order of Merit, the colonel considers starting a new war simply to please his supporters. This is an odd position for a man who once advocated working with the opposition to bring an end to conflict. Seen through the lens of nostalgia, societal bonds are not only insufficient buffers against political corruption, but also have become destructive forces in and of themselves. The novel’s conclusion joins memory and forgetting as final proof that societal structures fail to
North and Southâ•…â•… 477 meet the challenges posed by political and economic realities. Aureliano, the last survivor in Macondo, opens Melquíades’s papers, which magically relate the history of Macondo 100 years before it occurred. Aureliano begins to read, turning each page, advancing toward the past, seeking his origin. As he finds his beginning, and that of Macondo, a strong wind begins to blow, sweeping away the town. Such destruction implies that memory, presented here as a memoir of a people written before the fact, cannot offer salvation from the fatalistic forces that have consistently eaten away at the fabric of Latin American community. Moreover, it is in the exact moment before Aureliano discovers the answer he has been seeking—the true nature of his origins— that the destructive winds prevail. That is to say, just as Aureliano, society’s sole survivor, is about to have revealed to him not only his beginning but also the origin of his community as a whole, this moment of revelation and its power to rescue an entire people from a repetitious cycle of destruction are ripped away. Memory fails to rescue a society from its inevitable fate. In broader terms, Latin American history, doomed to repeat itself, cannot save a people who fail to remember the pitfalls of the past. Anne Massey
Gaskell, Elizabethâ•… North and Southâ•… (1854)
Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South contrasts life in the agrarian south of England with the livelier, more energetic way of life afforded in the manufacturing center of Milton-Northern, undoubtedly a pseudonym for Manchester, the industrial capital of 19th-century England. With this backdrop of regional and cultural transition Gaskell introduces questions about society and authority. She contrasts the typical “marriage of convenience”—matches made for economic advantage—with Margaret Hale’s dismissal of two successful prospects without consulting her parents. The Hales also question “justice” when hearing from their son Frederick of the horrid treatment of fellow sailors at the hands of their captain. Because of Frederick’s intervening for the men, the captain places Frederick adrift. Authorities label the incident
a “mutiny”; Frederick would be hanged if he were to return to English soil. How can justice prevail when loyal subjects cannot receive a fair hearing? Similarly, Gaskell raises questions about the justice of the factory system and its operation under the principles of “supply and demand.” Wages are kept low, and workers can barely survive. Again, Margaret Hale raises difficult questions about what owners owe workers and how the two groups might cooperate for the benefit of all. Gaskell advocates a greater sense of community between these groups, which had traditionally been economically and socially separated. A revolutionary look at the elements of society, North and South demonstrates the need for mutual understanding to break the barriers of class and economic disparity. Through the presence of a strong female protagonist, Gaskell ultimately seeks to prevent the kind of systemic abuses with which most people of her day were all too familiar. Anthony Grasso
Gender in North and South
Readers first encounter Margaret Hale in London at the Hawley Street home of her Aunt Shaw and cousin Edith as the family is preparing for the latter’s marriage to Captain Lennox. One is led to assume that only the traditional Victorian plot complications will arise. However, once back home in Helstone, a small agricultural community in the south, Margaret is wooed by Henry Lennox, brother of the captain and a successful attorney who has come expressly to propose. She rejects him politely but abruptly. Margaret’s action is surprising on at least two counts: First, a young woman of 18 rejects an excellent proposal; and, second, she does so without parental consent or involvement and this notion is anything but Victorian. Later the Hale family is required to move to the industrial city of MiltonNorthern when Mr. Hale, a minister, struggles with conscience over the autonomy of the church and gives up his living. Once settled there Margaret is placed in a similar situation when John Thornton, a successful mill owner, proposes. Although she and the Hales are considered economic and social inferiors, and this offer would have been prized by Victorian standards as an excellent match for her,
478â•…â•… Gaskell, Elizabeth Margaret rejects him outright, again without the knowledge or consent of her parents. Elizabeth Gaskell, the daughter and wife of Unitarian ministers, really shares the fundamental belief of Mary Wollstonecraft, author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, that women must be treated as rational and responsible because subordination is contrary to Christianity and because only rational beings can be capable mothers. Throughout the course of the novel, one senses Margaret—and Gaskell—bristling at any sense of power or entitlement over women that men may have been taught or raised to think was their right by social position. Margaret will not be stereotyped, even to the point of engaging the businessmen and mill owners, factory workers and others in a debate about their lives and responsibilities. Women in the novel are strong, except for those who represent typical domestic types: Margaret’s cousin, Edith, and Fanny Thornton, the mill owner’s sister, seen also preparing to wed a much older husband who is wealthy and successful. Both of these women are portrayed as dependent and concerned with frivolous matters, such as purchasing clothing and having dinner parties, knowing French, embroidery, piano, and social customs, but not having much purpose in life. Mrs. Hale, in contrast, feels she has made a bad marriage since her husband has not amounted to much, but she is a strong figure who stands by his decisions, survives the loss through exile of her son Frederick owing to his role in the mutiny against an unjust naval captain, and becomes ill with cancer, dealing stoically with her painful illness. Mrs. Thornton, John’s mother, lost her husband to suicide because he had made bad investments and lost his fortune. She stood behind her son’s climb back to becoming a mill owner and restoring the family fortune. She also spent time on the mill floor, helping her son to supervise workers—not the common role for a middle-class woman of means. Ironically, both women have been strengthened by the hardships in their lives, benefiting from adversity rather than being shielded from it as middle-class Victorian domestic hierarchy would have tended to do. Part of the gender theme surrounds and is intertwined with the working world of the industrial north, which offers few roles and opportunities,
changing customs and behaviors for women and also for both genders. Early in the novel, as Margaret wanders the streets of her new urban home, she is taken by what she perceives as the “forwardness” of men and women who actually touch her garments as they pass, commenting on their quality and on her fresh, natural beauty, which they admire without being lewd or untoward. One would never encounter such behavior in the strict social setting of London, or the more traditional and deferential agrarian south where Margaret was raised. Margaret is open to the change and discusses it with Betsy Higgins, the factory girl whom she befriends, and her father Nicholas, the union organizer and factory hand whom she tries to get John Thornton to hire after the strike. In fact, Margaret has been raised and educated by her father on a par with her brother Frederick. She is versed in the classics, in biblical themes, and in political economy as is seen in discussions at the Thorntons’ dinner party, where her opinions about the need for mill owners to care more for the welfare of their workers is quite controversial. Again, Gaskell departs from traditional gender roles by showing Margaret as a woman who is able to hold intelligent conversation about that matter of industry and the national economy, not restricted to conversations about trends in fashion or who is available for marriage. Through the death of her parents and the unfortunate turn of events of John Thornton’s mill, Margaret ends up as owner (from the behest of Mr. Bell, her guardian after her father’s sudden death). She is ready to assume not only legal ownership, but also a rightful place as an enlightened owner who knows the workers, their situation, and the realities of the industrial world at Milton-Northern. Only then, as an equal, can she and Thornton consider feelings for one another. Gaskell’s North and South offers an expanded and enlightened view of gender that serves as a model by which other 19th-century heroines and readers can judge women as rational, capable, and strong individuals with minds and lives of their own. Anthony Grasso
Justice in North and South
Gaskell’s concerns over law and justice are squarely placed within a context of practice: How are laws
North and Southâ•…â•… 479 and judgments made, and how ethical or moral are they really? Questions are raised on all social and religious fronts about how prejudice, custom, and erroneous human judgments affect the interpretation of laws and the carriage of justice throughout society. Early in the novel we are faced with Mr. Hale’s scrupulous examination of “The Thirty-Nine Articles” doctrine, stating tenets of faith to which all followers in the Church of England must adhere. When he has difficulty accepting some points of church authority, recently reinterpreted, Mr. Hale questions his own integrity and the justice of continuing in the ministry. Conscious of the great changes and possible hardships such a choice will mean for his family, he concludes as a matter of conscience that, since he can’t obey all the beliefs, he cannot remain as a practicing minister. This decision sets in motion the Hales’ move from Helstone in the south of England to Milton-Northern, a large industrial city in the north. While it may seem a small matter by today’s standards, Mr. Hale’s principle and adherence to the justice of earning a living falsely leads him to sacrifice a livelihood no one would have questioned. Frederick, whom readers discover only when Mrs. Hale becomes terminally ill, has been forced to live in Spain owing to his role in a professed mutiny aboard an English naval vessel on which he had served. The captain, obviously unbalanced, took beatings and punishments of the men and boys aboard to awful degrees. When the pleading of Frederick and other officers was not heard, they arranged a boat and decided to remove the captain with provisions, so as not to cause him harm but to correct what was a horrible situation. For that action, since the captain was eventually rescued, Frederick would return to England under pain of death if caught, because this action was treated as a “mutiny.” Gaskell questions the justice of laws in the naval code that clearly protect an incompetent leader who continually abuses power, over those who seek to redress the wrong and ensure the protection of lives essential to the safety of the entire vessel and crew. Frederick’s clandestine return to visit his dying mother, precipitated by Margaret’s letter to him, causes another crisis and issue. Needing to spirit
Fred out of the country after he spends some time with his mother, Margaret is seen with him at night at the railway station by John Thornton, whom she had earlier rejected as a suitor, complicating the social stigma. Fred is also recognized there by a former acquaintance, Leonards; in the ensuing struggle to escape and board the awaiting train, Fred inadvertently causes the drunken Leonards to fall, causing his ultimate death. Margaret, questioned by the police as a witness in the hearing, must lie to protect her brother’s life until she is certain that he is safely out of England. Two issues emerge: (1) the justice of the law that condemned Frederick for doing what was right to protect younger men and those under his care; and (2) the right of people to judge Margaret to be a “loose” woman, which John Thornton and his mother did, because she was seen walking at night in public with a man who was not her husband. Again, Gaskell questions how our flawed and often prejudicial human judgment affects the way in which laws are carried out, the role of conscience, and the importance of civil disobedience in opposing unjust laws. Throughout this interesting novel, Gaskell examines how people live and how society’s institutions function through a lens of justice, pointing out how fragile even the law is, let alone the weight of “tradition” that many social customs have accumulated, owing to the limitations of human knowledge and judgment. Ultimately, Gaskell promotes mutual human respect and interaction between and among all groups, rather than reliance upon hastily formed judgments, to ensure the understanding of the other as the way to realize the ideal of just treatment for every member of the society. One key example occurs after the strike. One of the main organizers, Nicholas Higgins, who has two daughters to support, also assumes responsibility for a widow and her five children, orphaned by their father who died by his own hand, despairing of being able to support his family. When no one will hire Higgins, because of his union connections, Margaret encourages John Thornton to overcome his lofty principles, to sacrifice “face” or honor, as Higgins himself had done by waiting for five hours in the damp, cold weather to ask Thornton for the job. There is real justice in sacrificing abstract “principles” to help the pressing
480â•…â•… Gaskell, Elizabeth needs of those around you in society, for whom a person of some authority or means may have or can accept increased responsibility. Gaskell reviews “authority” and its uses at every level of society to tackle the increasingly complicated question of “law and order” in her time and culture, a relevant question for us today as well. As the upward mobility of social groups was growing and the basic foundations of a strict society began to undergo rapid change during the Industrial Revolution, Gaskell is thinking about the implications for the betterment of community and of all people so that they will be treated fairly under the law and daily practices of the society. Throughout North and South she asks her readers to do the same. Anthony Grasso
Pride in North and South
As in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, characters in North and South suffer from and create problems for others owing to extreme pride. Early in the novel Margaret Hale, coming from modest means, is contrasted with her cousin Edith Shaw, with whom her parents have sent her to live so that she might gain the social advantages of meeting well-to-do young men. After Edith’s marriage to Captain Lennox, Margaret returns to rural Helstone and Henry Lennox, the captain’s brother and a lawyer, proposes to her. Her response—“I have never thought of you, but as a friend—I am sure I could never think of you as anything else”—is abrupt and stings Lennox’s pride. Lennox disappears from Helstone immediately, leaving the Hale family in a quandary as to his abrupt departure. With the family’s removal to Milton-Northern, Margaret meets John Thornton, the new mill owner whose mother is fiercely proud and overly protective of her son who has single-handedly brought the family back from financial ruin. Their pride comes from fierce determination and hard work, but the struggle to be regarded well in society’s eyes comes at a cost: Both are stern and suspicious of others’ intentions. As he was leaving for his lesson at the Hales’ house, Mrs. Thornton says to John “Take care you don’t get caught by a penniless girl, John.” Pride that comes from the attempt to “cover” perceived economic or social wants and setbacks
leads to mistaken judgments of others’ actions and motives. When John eventually proposes to Margaret, smitten as he is with her difference in background and demeanor, as well as her fiery spirit, she rejects him even more strongly than she had done to Henry Lennox, saying “Your way of speaking shocks me. It is blasphemous.” She’d disagreed with him on matters of political economy about the responsibilities of mill owners toward workers. Major misunderstanding comes when Margaret is caught at the Thorntons’ during a riot, since a strike is on at the mills. She has gone to the house to borrow a water bed, offered by Mrs. Thornton for her ailing mother to use. John Thornton has brought in Irish workers to keep his mill going, and has housed them on the premises. When the striking laborers hear about it and congregate outside, Margaret urges him to go down to talk with them, then runs outside herself, eventually taking a stone to the head thrown by a rabble-rouser, which was meant for Thornton. While being cared for in the Thornton household, she hears servant gossip indicating that she had “thrown herself ” at him. Concern over her own reputation and behavior prevents Margaret from seeing that the normally stoic John has been so affected by her strength, forwardness, and independence, that he drops his normal fierceness of demeanor to reveal his true heart. Her abrupt dismissal is more a defensive maneuver out of pride, yet causes greater pain to him than she had meant or even understood. Margaret also is the recipient of similar treatment at the hands of the Higgins family, fiercely proud workers whom she encounters on a walk. Set in her southern ways Margaret assumes, as the minister’s daughter and the economic superior of the workers, that she can “call” on them anytime for a visit as she did in the rural parish at Helstone. When she asks where they live and what their names are, Nicholas responds: “Whatter yo’ asking for?” Higgins is defensive of having his “betters” visit his home, not wanting to be dependent on anyone’s charity. Interestingly, Higgins the “uneducated” laborer provides the key to overcoming natural pride and shattering the accepted boundaries of social class. When he assumes financial responsibility for a
The Beggar’s Operaâ•…â•… 481 family whose father died during the strike, he seeks employment from Thornton’s mill. As a union organizer, he is “persona non grata” at any of the mills, and he knows that Thornton is a hard man to bargain with. After some prompting, Thornton hears about Higgins’s situation, follows him to where he lives in order to verify the story, and calls him to his office to apologize for misjudging his character. Higgins’s ability to place others first overcomes any reticence or aloofness that pride sets up. Once Higgins begins employment, he and Thornton devise a “lunchroom” scheme to provide workers and their families with employment and a means to have healthy food. The willingness to see beyond one’s prejudgments, and Higgins’s ability to act out of humility and concern for others’ needs, leads to deeper understanding of shared humanity, and levels of cooperation and friendship that bring social and economic barriers down. Anthony Grasso
Gay, Johnâ•… The Beggar’s Operaâ•… (1712)
John Gay’s operatic play dramatizes the story of Peachum and his partners in crime, whose lives become complicated when Macheath falls in love with Polly, Peachum’s daughter. The play begins with the Peachums extolling the virtues of single women to Polly, who responds that she has already married Macheath. Distraught over Polly’s marriage, Peachum laments the loss of his daughter’s contributions to his gang’s coffers, then seeks retaliation against Macheath. Peachum attempts to ruin Macheath by having him imprisoned, but intercessions by Polly and Lucy (Macheath’s other wife) ensure that Macheath escapes hanging. The play then concludes with the Player and Beggar determining that Macheath may avoid the gallows “to comply with the taste of the town.” Gay satirizes the exploits of the aristocracy through the shenanigans of Macheath and the other criminals in The Beggar’s Opera much as he satirizes foreign opera via the play’s numerous ballads: by sarcasm juxtaposed with action. Lockit the jailor, for instance, demands a cash bribe before granting Macheath light manacles, and Macheath while in prison sings an aria that blames women—not his
life of crime—for his incarceration. Polly, likewise, sings an aria that accuses Lucy of “ruining” their marriage to Macheath, but Polly’s tone—like that of the other characters—is serious, though her words jest. The satiric action coupled with the humorous depiction of married life in the early 18th century leaves modern audiences with little wonder as to why The Beggar’s Opera has maintained its popularity over the years. James N. Ortego II
Individual and Society in The Beggar’s Opera
The one character who emerges as a solitary figure in Gay’s The Beggar’s Opera is known simply as “Macheath,” a degenerate gambler and polygamist who escapes punishment from the law at the play’s end. Macheath is a part of the criminal element satirized by Gay, but is constantly at odds with his fellow law-breakers. In a society filled with prostitutes, thieves, and all sorts of other criminals, Macheath manages to excel at the art of law-breaking, yet the society that suffers from his crimes refuses to punish him. Gay’s dramatic satire consequently laments not London’s criminal types such as Macheath, but the society that allows the Macheaths of the world to prey on its citizens. Macheath is introduced early in the play as a “gamester and highwayman,” which interestingly enough is acceptable to the Peachums, until Mr. Peachum learns that his daughter Polly thinks Macheath “a very pretty man.” But Mr. Peachum’s subsequent denunciation of Macheath centers on married couples and spousal abuse; Peachum is not concerned with Macheath’s harsh character, his gambling problem, or his life as a thief, but with Polly’s regulation to secondary status once she marries Macheath. As the play’s primary representative of the criminal underworld, Peachum holds much influence over those around him; when he approves of Macheath’s lifestyle but denounces Polly’s desire to marry, spectators typically laugh, but the joke is centered squarely on a society that allows criminals such as Macheath to prosper, not necessarily on Peachum’s marital views. The opening scenes that feature the Peachums discussing Polly and Macheath’s future as a married couple establish Macheath as an outsider who breaks
482â•…â•… Gay, John an unspoken code of conduct when he attempts to marry and abandon his criminal lifestyle. Now that Macheath has considered marriage, he has become a terrible criminal whom his fellow thieves do not tolerate. By isolating Macheath via a proposed marriage with Polly, Gay cleverly establishes Macheath for his audience as an example of one whose faults lie not in willingly breaking the law, but in consorting with young women in the hopes of marrying them. Macheath emerges as a lone individual looking into a society that rejects his marital views but not his criminal lifestyle. Gay’s view, however, is consistently tempered with satire, as Macheath exclaims, “What a fool is a fond wench!” (3.3.71); and Polly may be thought of as “foolish” for pursuing Macheath, who is certainly not an exemplary suitor, but this is Gay’s satirical point. As punishment for his “crime” of consorting with Polly and hindering Peachum’s criminal efforts, Macheath is soon imprisoned at Newgate during a scene that isolates him as an exemplary criminal of the heart. As Lockit chains Macheath, the guard takes notice of Macheath’s crimes, and then marvels as the prisoner blames his misfortune on women. But Gay’s construction of the jail scene distinguishes Macheath from a society of criminals who seek to punish him for crimes against marriage instead of crimes against humanity. Macheath is guilty of stealing, gambling, beating and robbing travelers, and cheating at cards and dice, but these offenses are seldom mentioned as faults of Macheath. The focus appears to be on marriage, especially when Lucy visits Macheath to scold him, then accepts his promise because she wants to be made an “honest” woman. The audience, however, cannot help but remember that Macheath’s crimes against society go unpunished, which for Gay’s satire seems to be the real crime. For the duration of the play, Macheath remains in jail, subject to harsh verbal reproaches from Polly and Lucy (two of his six wives) for his deceitful marital practices, but at the end of the play, Macheath faces execution for a crime against society: “having broke prison.” The execution does not happen, however, due to the interference by the Player and Beggar, long thought by scholars to represent the voice of English society and John Gay the playwright,
respectively. Once the Beggar orders the guards to release Macheath, the Player concedes that “All this must we do, to comply with the taste of the town” (3.16.15). And thus Macheath escapes punishment for his crimes against society, but not for his crimes against marriage, for he is forced to live with his six wives. The play’s conclusion suggests that Macheath’s most terrible crimes involve marriage, not society, yet the subtle change to force an “opera to end happily” implies that Gay was not laughing at Macheath’s womanizing, but at those who allow criminals such as Macheath to escape justice for crimes against society. James N. Ortego II
Justice in The Beggar’s Opera
The Beggar’s Opera begins with an aria that imposes a moral judgment on the play to follow, yet from beginning to end, none of the main characters serves justice for their crimes. The Peachum gang regularly escapes punishment from the laws they break (although Macheath is incarcerated for a short time), but with good reason: to satirize the ineffectualness of 18th-century law enforcement and the penetration of crime throughout English society. Gay’s satire suggests not only that 18th-century laws were widely broken and seldom enforced, but also that the criminal element included persons from all social classes, any of whom might easily escape the law simply by bribing officials. Justice in The Beggar’s Opera is essentially nonexistent, and this is part of the play’s thematic concern with crime and justice. Soon after the play’s introductory aria, Peachum and Filch discuss the forthcoming trial of Black Moll, a common thief, who sardonically does not suffer for her crimes but instead receives a pardon via Peachum’s friendship with the prison officials at Newgate. After Peachum instructs Filch to hasten to Newgate to “let my friends know what I intend,” Filch responds that “↜‘tis a pleasure to be the messenger of comfort to friends in affliction” (l. 2). This early dialogue between Peachum and Filch establishes Peachum as a manipulator who easily evades the law and justice. Black Moll is by all accounts a drain upon society; her crimes cost the citizens their money and peace of mind, yet she, like every other
The Beggar’s Operaâ•…â•… 483 criminal in the play, escapes punishment. The world of the Peachums and the Black Molls is corrupt and unjust, but their corruption permeates all of society. Peachum’s ability to free Black Moll derives from his symbiotic relationship with the guards at Newgate, for as long as criminals such as Peachum and his gang control the prison officials, society will not see justice served. The Beggar’s Opera satirizes the ineffectiveness of justice, which is a thematic concern that seems ironic when spectators remember that a criminal during Gay’s time could face hanging for more than 500 offenses. Not even the threat of hanging can deter Peachum’s gang, who in act 2 discuss their various misdeeds, but in a manner that satirizes 18th-century English society and its inability to dole out justice to the criminal element. Beginning with the rhetorical question, “Why are the laws levelled at us?” Crookfingered Jack and his companions satirically validate their crimes by comparing themselves to the nobility, who, according to the gang, are no better than common criminals. After reaffirming that each gang member would die for his friends and keep their secrets safe, Matt of the Mint says, “Show me a gang of courtiers that can say as much,” a response that suggests that the nobility of Gay’s England does not have the same “decency” as the common criminal. Gay implies through Matt of the Mint’s sarcasm that class is the only distinction among thieves; while theft was certainly forbidden by 18th-century laws, the play’s thematic concern with justice suggests that only the poor suffer from the laws, yet the play punishes no one. When Jemmy Twitcher wonders, “Are we more dishonest than the rest of mankind?” spectators must silently answer “no” and muse about a society that attempts to punish its lower-class criminals but ignores similar offenses among the nobility. While the play features characters who consistently worry about escaping the law, no one except Macheath suffers any punishment that may be considered “just,” and that for only a short period of time. Once Peachum realizes that Macheath’s marriage threatens the Peachum gang, Peachum frames Macheath and has him imprisoned, but Polly manages to help Macheath escape from prison in much the same manner that her father helps Black Moll
escape the law. Ironically, Peachum has trained his daughter too well, for she thwarts his attempts to ruin Macheath and “aid[s] him in his escape,” yet neither Polly, Peachum, nor Macheath suffer justice for their crimes. Before Macheath is led away to be hung, the Beggar and the Player interrupt and free Macheath “to comply with the taste of the town.” This final allusion to an inadequate justice system marks for Gay a concluding commentary that demonstrates that not only do criminals mock the courts and their officials, but such instances also are commonplace among all members of society. The upper, middle, and lower classes all suffer the pangs of injustice, and in the end, only the audience is laughing. James N. Ortego II
Love in The Beggar’s Opera
The Beggar’s Opera owes its resounding success in part to the play’s thematic concerns with love and marriage. Polly, the oft-simplistic daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Peachum, finds herself at the center of a love triangle involving herself, Macheath, and Lucy, a prostitute. Additional problems arise for the young lovers when Polly’s parents decidedly forbid her to marry Macheath. Polly’s conflict stems from her filial duty to her parents and her love for Macheath, but her arguments that dismiss “honor or money” in favor of “love for him” fall on the deaf ears of her father, Peachum. Polly wants simply to become like the “gentle town ladies” she admires, but her marriage would cause her parents great financial loss. Early 18th-century women who married became literally the property of their husbands, which is what the Peachums fear might happen to Polly. Her entreaties to her parents (often expressed in song) for a union with Macheath frequently elicit from her father threats of violence and misery, which in turn prompt Polly to pursue Macheath in secret. Polly and Macheath determine that—for his own safety—“we must part” until she can devise some way to convince Peachum that marriage would best suit her interests. The two lovers then part with a kiss and a song as the play’s focus then shifts to the criminal lifestyle of the Peachums. Macheath, upon his departure from Polly, visits a group of his fellow criminals to discuss the hazards
484â•…â•… Gilman, Charlotte Perkins of criminal activity while he ponders his “foolish wench,” Polly. Macheath confesses that Polly’s affections sway him to consider marriage seriously, but his thoughts are soon interrupted by the entrance of Mrs. Coaxer and her stable of prostitutes. After much banter concerning the “kind service” provided by Mrs. Coaxer’s women, Macheath is shortly arrested by Peachum, the culmination of his plot to remove Macheath from Polly’s life. Macheath then curses women as “decoy ducks” who seek only to destroy men, a sentiment that soon sours his attitude toward Polly. Macheath is first visited in Newgate Prison by Lucy, a former lover, who immediately rebukes him for his relationship to Polly. Macheath has a way with words, however, and he is soon able to calm Lucy’s trepidations. Peachum, meanwhile, has presented his case against Macheath to Lockit the prison guard, who confirms Macheath’s guilt and threatens him with execution. Polly then visits Macheath as he broods in prison, and she meets Lucy for the first time, and the two women learn of Macheath’s polygamy. The rival women first focus their anger toward Macheath, then turn their rage upon each other. Each jilted women takes little comfort in Macheath’s assurance of love as a “joke.” Soon Lucy begins to soften her stance toward Macheath, but Polly remains in turmoil. Lockit meanwhile finds himself trying to keep track not only of Macheath, Polly, and Lucy, but also of Peachum’s plot to have Macheath executed for his crimes. The multiple subplots prove too much for Lockit, however, and Macheath manages to escape with Lucy’s aid, only “to go to her” (Polly), as Lucy fears. To calm her worries, Lucy then decides to confront Polly and settle the argument between them once and for all, and the two women carry on numerous arguments and discussions about love, men, marriage, and women. Neither woman reaches a satisfactory conclusion regarding themselves and Macheath, and the play then hastens to a conclusion that leaves the love triangle involving Lucy, Polly, and Macheath unresolved. After finally being confronted by both women in prison near the end of the play, the Jailor introduces “four women more,” each one “bearing a child” to Macheath. Six women now appear on stage and
each claims an amorous association with Macheath, but rather than pick one of the six, the Beggar and Player suddenly appear and release Macheath from prison to appease the audience, and there the play ends. The audience never knows which woman Macheath ultimately chooses, if he chooses any woman at all, nor whether or not he is legally married to Polly, Lucy, or both. Instead, The Beggar’s Opera ends on a humorous note that leaves the spectators to draw their own conclusions regarding love. James N. Ortego II
Gilman, Charlotte Perkinsâ•… The Yellow Wallpaperâ•… (1892)
The Yellow Wallpaper was first published in New England Magazine as “The Yellow Wall-Paper” in 1892. Although now seen as Gilman’s most important work, during her lifetime she was most known for Women and Economics (1898), a nonfiction work that explored the place of women in late-19thcentury America. The Yellow Wallpaper was largely critically ignored until it was reissued by the Feminist Press in 1973. The Yellow Wallpaper is the first-person account of a woman undergoing a “rest cure.” She has been diagnosed with a “hysterical tendency” by her physician husband because she has been unable to care for her newborn baby. As part of her “rest cure,” she has been confined to an attic room and forbidden to have any physical, emotional, or intellectual stimulation. This includes the instruction that she is not to write. The story, her journal account of her experience, becomes evidence of her disagreement and defiance of this prescription. Shortly after being confined, the narrator decides that there is something strange about the wallpaper that covers the walls of this attic room. As the story progresses, she becomes convinced that there are women trapped inside the strange pattern of the wallpaper. The story ends with the narrator’s attempt at freeing the women in the wallpaper. Three major themes explored by Gilman in The Yellow Wallpaper are illness, gender, and freedom. Since its republication, The Yellow Wallpaper has been considered an important work, not only of feminist literature but also of American literature.
The Yellow Wallpaperâ•…â•… 485 Almost all major anthologies of American literature include The Yellow Wallpaper. Carmine Esposito
Freedom in The Yellow Wallpaper
The main character’s fight for freedom is a major theme of The Yellow Wallpaper. At the start of The Yellow Wallpaper, we are told that the narrator is being treated by her physician husband for a nervous condition. As part of her treatment, the narrator is confined to an attic room and “absolutely forbidden to ‘work.’↜” Even though the narrator disagrees with this treatment, she is powerless to fight it, “Personally, I believe that congenial work, with excitement and change, would do me good. But what is one to do?” The narrator finds herself at the start of the story both physically and psychologically confined. As the story progresses, we witness the narrator free herself from the psychological strictures that bind her. Undergoing the “rest cure,” the narrator is not free to make decisions about her life as even trips and visitors are carefully regulated by her husband, “I tried to have a real earnest reasonable talk with him the other day, and tell him how I wish he would let me go and make a visit to Cousin Henry and Julia. But he said I wasn’t able to go, nor able to stand it after I got there.” Unable to communicate with her husband, the narrator finds strength in writing her thoughts in her journal, “And I know John would think it absurd. But I must say what I feel and think in some way—it is such a relief !” Writing becomes the vehicle through which the narrator begins the process of freeing herself. In the first half of the story, the room in which the narrator is confined becomes, for her, a symbol of her lack of freedom, “I don’t like our room a bit. I wanted one downstairs that opened on the piazza.” The garden that she can see from the windows of her attic room becomes a symbol of freedom, “There is a delicious garden! I never saw such a garden—large and shady, full of box-bordered paths, and lined with long grape-covered arbors with seats under them.” As the story progresses she begins to see a woman in the wallpaper that covers the walls of her attic room, “Behind that outside pattern the dim shapes get clearer every day. It is always the same
shape, only very numerous. And it is like a woman stooping down and creeping about behind the pattern.” The narrator realizes that the woman in the wallpaper is trapped by the pattern of the wallpaper much in the same way as she is trapped in the attic room: “The faint figure behind seemed to shake the pattern, just as if she wanted to get out.” In the second half of The Yellow Wallpaper, the narrator struggles to free the woman in the wallpaper as she fights to free herself from her life of servility as a mother and wife. She begins by tearing down the wallpaper that confines the woman; “I pulled and she shook, I shook and she pulled, and before morning we had peeled off yards of that paper.” As the narrator fights for her freedom, her attitude toward the room changes; “I quite enjoy the room, now it is bare again.” What earlier was a symbol of her servility, the room, becomes a source for her freedom. In the attic room, she is free to act as she chooses; “It is so pleasant to be out in this great room and creep around as I please.” The garden, which had earlier represented freedom for her, now promises only confinement. In the garden, the narrator would not be free to act as she chooses, “I don’t want to go outside. I won’t, even if Jennie asks me to. For outside you have to creep on the ground, and everything is green instead of yellow.” In this way, The Yellow Wallpaper can be read as a story of liberation. At the end, the narrator is able to free herself from the life of servility that patriarchal culture would have her accept as normal. But what is also clear is that this liberation is limited and her freedom comes with a price. Ironically, the narrator can be free only when she decides to confine herself to her attic room. Through this, The Yellow Wallpaper shows us that all struggles for liberation and freedom are limited by the culture that surrounds them. Carmine Esposito
Gender in The Yellow Wallpaper
One way to read The Yellow Wallpaper is as a story that explores the relationship between gender and power in the United States in the 19th century. At the start of the story the narrator tells us about the nature of her relationship with her husband: “John laughs at me, of course, but one expects that in
486â•…â•… Gilman, Charlotte Perkins Â� marriage.” The attitude John has toward the narrator reflects the general attitude of men toward women at this time. More important, at the beginning of the story, the narrator agrees with and accepts this attitude as “natural.” At the start of the story, we see that this attitude leads the narrator to be treated as if she were a child. She is put in an attic room even though she wanted a room that opened onto the garden. She believes that this attic room was used as a nursery in the past, which reflects her suspicion that she is being treated as a child. In addition, the narrator is never named by the author. The story is written in the first person, being made up of her journal entries. However, her husband never refers to her by her name, always referring to her by a pet name, such as “blessed goose” or “little girl,” which reduces her to a child. Throughout the first half of the story, the narrator compares herself to her sister-in-law Jenny and the housekeeper Mary. She feels very badly that she cannot perform her “duties” as a wife and mother: “It does weigh on me so not to do my duty in any way!” We find out that the reason they have hired Mary and that the narrator is considered “sick” is that the narrator is unable to take care of her child: “It is fortunate Mary is so good with the baby. Such a dear baby! And yet I cannot be with him, it makes me so nervous.” For the narrator, her sister-in-law comes to represent the ideal wife and mother, the woman who finds fulfillment in putting her husband and children’s well-being and desires above her own: “She is a perfect and enthusiastic housekeeper, and hopes for no better profession.” Part of the narrator’s “problem” is that she doesn’t want to put her “duties” as a mother and wife above her own desire to write, a choice her husband is not forced to make. When she tells her husband that she feels better when he is at home and asks him to stay with her, he answers, “Why, how can I, dear?” meaning his responsibility to his profession and patients comes before his wife’s needs. As a woman, the narrator could never put her professional responsibilities above the needs of her husband or child. In the second half of the story, the narrator begins to see women trapped behind the wallpaper that covers the walls of her attic room. These women
can be read as psychological projections of the narrator’s predicament: As they are trapped behind the wallpaper, she is trapped in this attic room. They can also be read as a metaphor for the position of women in the United States in the 19th century. The women trapped behind the wallpaper represent the lack of power and freedom women had at this time. After encountering these women, the narrator notices that they “creep,” saying “And it is like a woman stooping down and creeping about behind the pattern.” Creeping becomes a metaphor for any unacceptable behavior by women, “It must be very humiliating to be caught creeping by daylight! I always lock the door when I creep by daylight.” It is at this point that the narrator decides to free the women by tearing down all the wallpaper in the room. In tearing down the wallpaper, the narrator not only frees the women in the wallpaper but also starts the process of her own questioning of the “naturalness” of gender roles. This questioning leads to the reversals in gender roles that signal the shift in power at the end of the story. While in the first half of the story, the narrator was treated as a child, silenced by her husband, and locked in her attic room, at the end of the story, she turns her husband into a child by calling him “young man,” she locks everyone out of her room by tossing the key out the window, and silences her husband when she informs him, “↜‘the key is down by the front steps, under a plantain leaf !’↜” The final reversal of power takes place in the last two lines of the story, “Now why should that man have fainted? But he did, and right across my path by the wall, so that I had to creep over him every time!”At the time this story was written, melodrama was very popular, and in traditional melodrama, women faint. John’s fainting at the end of the story signals to us a reversal in gender roles. And the narrator’s continuing to “creep,” even after her husband has “blocked” her path, signals to us a reversal of power. The narrator is no longer “under” her husband, but “over him.” Carmine Esposito
Illness in The Yellow Wallpaper
The Yellow Wallpaper is an autobiographical short story based on Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s own
Triflesâ•…â•… 487 experience with illness and the “rest cure.” At the beginning of The Yellow Wallpaper, we learn that the narrator, like Gilman, has been diagnosed as suffering from a “temporary nervous depression—a slight hysterical tendency,” following the birth of her child. The narrator’s husband, John is a physician. The treatment they have prescribed for the narrator is the “rest cure.” At the end of the 19th century, the “rest cure” was a common treatment for upper-class women deemed to be suffering from “women’s diseases” such as “hysteria.” The “rest cure” required that patients have no physical or intellectual stimulation. Part of what this means for the narrator is that she has been forbidden to write. The narrator does not agree with this prescription, and The Yellow Wallpaper itself becomes evidence of her resistance to her treatment, since it is made up of the journal entries she has been secretly recording. The narrator is threatened that if she doesn’t get well and follow her husband’s instructions, she will be sent to Dr. S. Weir Mitchell, whom the narrator describes as, “like John and my brother, only more so.” Mitchell was the physician who treated Gilman for “hysteria” and who was famous for his “rest cure” for “hysterics.” In the late 19th century, “women’s diseases” such as “hysteria” were often associated with actions or emotional responses that were seen as inappropriate for women. In the narrator’s case, she is diagnosed with “hysteria” because she has not “properly” bonded with her baby—“It is fortunate Mary is good with the baby. Such a dear baby! And yet I cannot be with him, it makes me so nervous”—and because of her heightened imagination, “He says that with my imaginative power and habit of storymaking, a nervous weakness like mine is sure to lead to all manner of excited fancies, and that I ought to use my will and good sense to check the tendency.” It is important to note that in the late 19th century neither of these traits would be seen as an illness in men. The narrator’s imaginative tendency is contrasted to John’s scientific approach to life: “John is practical in the extreme. He has no patience with faith, an intense horror of superstition, and he scoffs openly at any talk of things not being felt and seen and put down in figures.” Even in judging if his wife’s con-
dition is improving, John uses quantifiable criteria: “You are gaining flesh and color, your appetite is better, I feel really much easier about you.” When the narrator suggests that her “problem” may be other than physical, she is quickly silenced, “Better in body perhaps—.” In the world the narrator lives in, reason equals health and imagination equals illness. But ironically, it is only when the narrator indulges her imagination in contemplating the mystery of the wallpaper that she begins to feel better. “John is so pleased to see me improve! He laughed a little the other day, and said I seemed to be flourishing in spite of my wall-paper. I turned it off with a laugh. I had no intention of telling him it was because of the wallpaper—he would make fun of me.” Illness can be read in two ways in The Yellow Wallpaper, one literal and one metaphorical. On one level, the story can be read as a protest against the treatment that Gilman herself received under Dr. Weir Mitchell’s care. Gilman believed that her condition worsened while undergoing the “rest cure” and that she improved only when she took control of her own treatment and indulged her creative impulses. Gilman’s experience with the “rest cure” is reflected in the experience of the narrator of The Yellow Wallpaper. In fact, Weir Mitchell acknowledged the role the The Yellow Wallpaper played in his abandoning the “rest cure” as a treatment. Metaphorically, illness can be read as a device used by patriarchal culture to control the behavior of women. When the narrator of The Yellow Wallpaper behaves in ways that are seen as inappropriate for a woman to act, she is deemed ill and is locked in a room until the inappropriate behavior can be controlled. In this way, the story employs illness as a metaphor for the control patriarchal culture has over the lives of women. Carmine Esposito
Glaspell, Susanâ•… Triflesâ•… (1916)
In Trifles, Susan Glaspell depicts the murder case of John Wright. Based on a trial that Glaspell covered as a journalist, the play takes place in the Wright home on the morning after John’s wife, Minnie, was arrested for strangling her husband. Men enter the house on official business: The county attorney, the sheriff, and Mr. Hale are there to secure evidence
488â•…â•… Glaspell, Susan and find clues that might aid them in solving the crime. In their search, they concentrate on the bedroom, where the body was found, and the entrance ways to the house to see if an intruder might have killed John Wright. On the other hand, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, while packing some things together for the incarcerated Minnie, find evidence among Minnie’s things that not only prove Minnie’s guilt, but also bear witness to her lonely and isolated life with a husband who did not care much about her. Minnie’s quilt, a nice and carefully done piece for the most part, was sewn together haphazardly in other places—a sign to the women that told them of Minnie’s distress and preoccupation. Furthermore, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters stumble over the body of a dead canary. They conclude that it must have been John Wright who had wrung its neck, and Minnie put it away lovingly in a box because the bird had been the only thing to ever bring some joy into her life. Full of sympathy and understanding for Minnie, the women conceal the evidence from the returning men who consider the kitchen as too unimportant to contain anything of value for their investigation. Elke Brown
Gender in Trifles
Gender is probably the central theme of Trifles. Indeed, it pervades all other aspects and themes of the play, such as isolation and justice. In Trifles, we are confronted with very clear gender definitions: Men and women have their own spheres, and they each follow their own ethical and moral standards. In the setting of the play, men stand for the rational, objective, professional world. Thus, the men’s idea of justice follows the interpretation of the law without much consideration of emotional or psychological circumstances. For example, the attorney is looking for a suspect, but he does not stop to consider the question of motive for John Wright’s murder. Consequently, in his complete dismissal of the female sphere, he fails to recognize clues as such. This male arrogance, born of century-old feelings of superiority over women, precludes any success in his investigation. The same kind of arrogance also led to John Wright’s death. Admittedly, being a man who loves
his quiet and dislikes singing may just be a personality issue. However, nothing gave Wright the right to dominate and terrorize his wife, Minnie. According to Mrs. Hale, the Wrights’ neighbor, Wright was a harsh man, and his moods and possible violence caused Minnie’s spirit to be subdued. Finally, when Wright killed Minnie’s canary in an outburst of rage, he also destroyed the last bit of beauty that had been in her life. This act seals his fate: Without anything to care for other than a husband who does not seem to care much for her, Minnie strangles her husband. The clues that might explain her motive are all found in and around the kitchen—traditionally, the very symbol of the woman’s place. In fact, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters are the ones who find these clues and interpret them correctly. As women, they know about life as a farmer’s wife. They share the experience of living a fairly isolated life of hard work. Even if their marriages are happier than Minnie’s was, life in this midwestern community for women is similar enough to draw the correct conclusions about Minnie’s motive. While women and men clearly have different attitudes and their spheres seem separate enough, they are not entirely separate from each other. The play clearly demonstrates how, whenever a relationship exists between men and women, the women are supposed to convert to the male point of view. When the attorney addresses Mrs. Peters, he fully expects her to act in the spirit of her husband’s official orders. As a sheriff ’s wife, she is married not only to Mr. Peters, the person, but also to his profession. Hence, her idea of justice is supposed to be submission to the official (male) interpretation of the law. Mrs. Peters is governed by this dogma, until she remembers the silence in her own house after the death of one of her children. This memory produces a powerful bond between her and Minnie’s experience of isolation and loneliness, so powerful, indeed, that Mrs. Peters herself attempts to hide the box with the dead canary in it—fully aware that this action goes against everything society and her husband expect her to do, not only on legal grounds but also because, as a wife, Mrs. Peters is not supposed to act against her husband. Both Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale consciously defy the laws laid down by
Triflesâ•…â•… 489 the patriarchal order and thus declare their rights as individuals and women. In our so-called enlightened time, we occasionally overlook the truth that, even today, inequalities between men and women exist—be they employment opportunities or the question of equal pay. When Trifles was written, the woman as the “angel in the house” was an idea as popular as it had been in the late 19th century. However, it would be wrong to assume that Trifles has no significance beyond the 1920s. What the drama depicts, most of all, is a psychological study of power structures in a patriarchy where men and women are on opposing sides and what can happen if the angel in the house is married to a devil. Elke Brown
Isolation in Trifles
In her play Trifles, Susan Glaspell alerts us to the harsh life of the midwestern farmer’s wife. Through the sheer vastness of the land, people in a farming community live relatively far apart, but spatial isolation does not necessarily lead to murder. Minnie Wright’s case illustrates that it is her social and emotional isolation from the community that drive her to her desperate act. Certainly, the logistical and geographical conditions of a farming community preclude proximity. Yet communal activities exist: Mrs. Hale laments the fact that Minnie stopped singing in the church choir and being a member of the Ladies Aid. She assumes that Minnie felt she could not attend anymore because she could not contribute enough. Thus, her financial circumstances preclude Minnie from perceiving herself as being on equal social footing with the other women. She feels uncomfortable in their company and gives up on joint projects. While it is not clear from the play whether John Wright had anything to do with Minnie’s decision to stop any of these activities, Mrs. Hale’s description of him makes it seem very likely that he did. According to her, Wright was a harsh man, who liked to have his quiet and disapproved of conversation and singing. For that reason, he wrung the canary’s neck. Likewise, he killed his wife’s creative and musical spirit, turning a happy, cheerful Minnie Foster into a lonely, desperate Minnie Wright.
This lack of cheerfulness in the Wright household isolated Minnie only further. While all farmers’ wives lead a busy life with everything there is to do around a farm and to keep up a household, Mrs. Hale admits that this had not been the reason why she stopped visiting her neighbor Minnie. Indeed, it was the lack of cheerfulness, the tangible coldness of the place that kept her away. Now that Minnie is in jail and John Wright dead, Mrs. Hale feels guilty about not coming more often, thinking that, if Minnie had had one thing to look forward to—the visit of a friend—she might not have killed her husband. Minnie’s loneliness and isolation are symbolized in the quilt that she had been working on. Ironically, it is this quilt that “speaks” to Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters in Minnie’s stead. The quilt she had been working on is a log cabin pattern and, as the women explain to the men, Minnie was going to knot it. The first clue about Minnie’s real state of mind lies in the fact that parts of the quilt have been sewn together haphazardly—Mrs. Hale at once sets to correcting the stitches, probably fully aware of the fact that she is destroying evidence. Apparently, Minnie was too distracted and preoccupied after her husband killed the canary to pay attention to her sewing. Traditionally, quilting is a communal activity. That Minnie was working on this quilt by herself is another indication of her isolated state. Yet, quilting provided her with a creative outlet that would also produce something useful. It would, thus, have been an acceptable activity to her husband. The fact that Minnie was going to knot the quilt—a method of joining the layers of a quilt—illustrates the fact that her emphasis was on getting the job done quickly rather than producing a fine piece of art, certainly reflective of John Wright’s attitude toward household items. Furthermore, the quilt is a log cabin pattern. In this pattern, each square begins with a small middle square around which rectangular strips are sewn until the block is complete. The quilt and its overall pattern are revealed only when all the blocks are joined. The single block contributes to the pattern but has no significance on its own. Minnie’s position equals that of the innermost, smallest square that, although the center of the block, is the tiniest and least remarkable one.
490â•…â•… Glaspell, Susan This position is supported by Minnie’s sleeping arrangements. As she tells the sheriff, she did not notice John Wright’s death because she was lying on the inside of the bed. Thus, she was boxed in by walls and her husband. To break free, she had to break one or the other. Trifles shows us that, while spatial conditions can contribute to isolation, they are not the deciding factor. In fact, Minnie’s unbearable isolation was caused by her husband’s complete lack of understanding or tolerance of her personality. These gender relations, the complete dominance of the patriarchal authority that does not leave Minnie any space to be herself in a place and time that does not allow for divorce without making Minnie a complete outcast, force her to the desperate final act of killing her husband. Elke Brown
Justice in Trifles
Although we like to think of justice as a completely objective, impartial force, Trifles nicely demonstrates that this is not the case. In fact, we are confronted with various interpretations of what justice entails. At first glance, there appears to be only the kind of justice illustrated by its official representatives, namely Sheriff Peters and the county attorney. These two represent the law and have to make sure that the investigation of the crime scene, John Wright’s house, follows due procedure. They are there to secure evidence and discourage any tampering with the crime scene. However, as the play progresses, the simple, clear-cut definition of justice becomes increasingly complicated. It soon becomes evident that there is a distinction between insiders and outsiders of the community. The county attorney, as outsider, demands the following of protocol. He knew neither John nor Minnie Wright or anything about their history, and he cuts off the others every time they begin to explain the nature of their neighbors’ relationships. What he is looking for is hard, tangible evidence; he is not interested in any psychological implications. The people who knew the Wrights, however, place some importance on their knowledge of the couple. Repeatedly, they attempt to inform the county attorney of little facts that reveal the fabric
of the community. While both the men and women try to interest the attorney in the Wrights as people and not just as murder victim and suspect, it is the women who have the clearest insight into their relationship. Although they are constantly dismissed by the lawyer, they ironically uncover all the evidence that points to Minnie as her husband’s murderer. In the exchange between Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, the complicated nature of justice becomes evident. Mrs. Hale has known Minnie for a long time but stopped visiting her because the joyless atmosphere in the Wright house made her feel uncomfortable. Now she feels guilty for having abandoned Minnie and partially responsible for Wright’s murder. Her idea of justice is guided by the knowledge of what life is like for a farmer’s wife and her acquaintance with the Wrights. Knowing that John Wright was a hard man who did not allow for singing or even much talking around him, she senses that he destroyed Minnie’s happy spirit. After their marriage, Minnie stopped attending any social functions and did not sing anymore, although she had always enjoyed being in the church choir. When Mrs. Hale finds the canary with its broken neck, she immediately realizes that this bird symbolizes Minnie’s spirit broken by her husband just as he broke the canary’s neck. Mrs. Hale understands that the bird provided Minnie with song and joy in her lonely, childless marriage. Mrs. Hale surmises that, after Wright killed the bird, his wife’s despair over the loss of the one thing that brightened her life drove her to strangle her husband with a rope. Mrs. Hale questions the institution of justice as it is pursued by its officials; to her, Minnie’s crime—though gruesome—is justified and the people who should be on trial are John Wright and her as a representative of the community that abandoned Minnie. On the other hand, Mrs. Peters at first tries to share the official stance of her husband and attempts to keep any personal knowledge from interfering with the investigation. However, as a fellow woman and insider of the community, she is well aware of the harshness and isolation of the midwestern farmer’s wife. She eventually completely connects with Minnie’s plight when Mrs. Hale tells her about the oppressing stillness of the house. Having lost a child and reflecting on how quiet it got after
Lord of the Fliesâ•…â•… 491 its death, Mrs. Peters fully comprehends Minnie’s loneliness. It is this shared experience that convinces her of the righteousness of Mrs. Hale’s manipulation of the evidence. At first shocked when Mrs. Hale sits down to undo a piece of Minnie’s quilt that the latter had been working on but that had been sewn badly and haphazardly due to Minnie’s state of mind, Mrs. Peters tries to stuff the box that contains the dead bird into her bag. Since she cannot fit it in there, Mrs. Hale hides it in her coat pocket, so that the men will not be able to find it and use it against Minnie. The women thus decide that their humanistic idea of justice outweighs the men’s dogmatic reading of the law. Elke Brown
Golding, Williamâ•… Lord of the Fliesâ•… (1954)
William Golding’s first novel, Lord of the Flies, was originally published in 1954, and it has been required reading in most schools and colleges since the early 1960s. The novel centers around a group of English schoolboys whose plane crashes onto a deserted island during World War II. They subsequently try to form a mini-civilization only to reach a horrific outcome. The book’s views on human nature and its relationship to civilization, illustrated through the boys’ behavior, has caused it to be one of the most challenged books of the late 20th century. The main characters consist of Ralph, Piggy, and Jack. Ralph, one of the older boys, becomes the impromptu leader of the group. He, with the help of the socially inept Piggy, sets about creating a society on the island through building shelters, constructing a signal fire, and organizing the collection of food. Jack is the leader of the hunters and Ralph’s rival for power over the group. Eventually most of the boys follow Jack’s example and become swept up in the thrill of the hunt, leaving Ralph and the island society behind, with disastrous results. Golding uses these children to explore themes such as individual and society, cruelty, survival, community, ethics, isolation, and spirituality. Lord of the Flies is meant to be an allegory. Its characters represent abstract principles such as reason, societal rules, spirituality, and savagery. Golding
seems to think that all of these influence human behavior and have a part in human nature. However, he appears to view savagery as the core of human nature, based on the behavior of most of the boys by the end of the book. Ryan Neighbors
Cruelty in Lord of the Flies
Lord of the Flies by William Golding centers on a group of schoolboys who are marooned on a deserted island after their plane crashes. Initially, the boys try to set up life on the island much as it was in civilization—they create an island democracy, choose a “biggun,” Ralph, as their leader, and set about building shelter and finding food. However, as the boys spend more time on the island, they become increasingly cruel. This tendency toward cruelty can be seen very early in the novel. For instance, in one scene, Henry, one of the “littluns,” plays with plankton on the beach, trapping them in his footprint when the tide comes in. He enjoys this cruel control over other living things. Little does he know that one of the bigguns, Roger, is exerting the same control over him. As Henry plays, Roger watches from the jungle, throwing rocks in a circle around the little boy. The implication is that Roger not only longs for that control but also actually wishes to do harm to Henry. All that stops him are cultural values he has learned from his parents and from his society. The cruelty in the novel continues through the boys’ desire to hunt. This hunting begins innocently enough—Jack, one of the older children, dubs the choirboys the hunters and himself their leader, intending to help provide food for all of the boys. However, hunting soon becomes an obsession. In fact, the hunters eventually shun all of their other responsibilities in favor of the hunt. This even causes the group to miss a chance at rescue, because the hunters fail to keep the signal fire lit as a ship passes by the island. Their obsession with hunting eventually leads them to bloodlust, frenzy, and murder. This descent begins when the hunters kill a sow. They stick its head on a pike and begin to dance in a ritualistic, tribal celebration. In the midst of this commotion, Simon, one of the older boys, wanders into the group,
492â•…â•… Golding, William and the other boys kill him, thinking him a monster. Ralph and his friend Piggy feel remorse over Simon’s death and try to get Jack and his hunters to see reason. However, Jack will not listen. Roger rolls a boulder over Piggy, killing him, and the hunters chase Ralph into the jungle. He hides for nearly a day as he is hunted like an animal. The only thing that saves him is the boys’ rescue by the British navy. The main symbol for cruelty in the novel is the beast. From the beginning, the “littluns” have nightmares, and many believe a monster lurks on the island. One night when a dead pilot drops from the sky in a parachute, the boys believe they have actually seen the monster. As they become more enthralled in the hunt and its bloodlust, they even begin to worship this beast, leaving it sacrifices, such as the sow’s head on a pike, as if it were a tribal god. Only Simon is able to realize the truth. He sees the dead pilot for what he really is and also realizes the truth of the beast through a vision in which the sow’s head talks to him as “Lord of the Flies.” Simon realizes there is no external beast. There is only the cruelty that exists in each of the boys. They fear it because it is in them. It is this knowledge and Simon’s innate morality that necessitates his death. In a sense, he is too good for the island, and the world. This seems to be the central point of the story— cruelty is a basic aspect of human nature. The island does not make the boys barbaric. They are naturally that way. The island only provides an environment, away from societal norms and values, for their true nature to manifest itself. That is why the descent into cruelty progresses as it does in the novel. It takes time for the societal values to wear away, leaving behind the boys’ true selves, ending with terrible consequences. Ryan Neighbors
Individual and Society in Lord of the Flies
In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, a group of English schoolboys are stranded on a deserted island when their plane is shot down as they flee Britain. In the beginning of the novel, the boys have a meeting and form a mini-civilization, electing an older boy named Ralph as their leader. As the novel progresses, however, more and more of the boys begin to live as hunters, led by self-proclaimed warrior-
dictator Jack, turning their backs on the society they have created on the island. This tug-of-war between individual impulses and the rules and welfare of their society is apparent in nearly all of the schoolboys and through several symbols in the novel. This struggle is seen most clearly in the novel’s protagonist Ralph. Ralph represents society and order in Golding’s narrative. He uses the conch shell to call the meeting and is named as the boys’ leader, initiating their island democracy. He immediately urges the boys to construct huts on the beach and build a signal fire on the mountain, so they will hopefully be returned to the society of the adults. During the course of the novel, however, Ralph, like the other boys, begins to feel the bloodlust within himself. On his first hunt, he experiences the thrill of violence and even gets swept up in the dancing frenzy after the killing of a sow. It is the murder of Simon at this celebration, though, that returns Ralph to his senses. He again becomes a civilizing influence to the boys, even though most of them have already turned their backs on society to indulge their individual urges. This indulgence of impulses centers around the character of Jack. He is the boy who suggests the children hunt in the beginning of the novel. In fact, he becomes obsessed with the activity, and his enthusiasm spreads to many of the other boys. He leads the group in the killing of the sow, the resulting tribe-like celebration, and the murder of Simon. Later in the novel, he even breaks away from Ralph’s newly formed society, forming his own tribe of hunters. Jack comes to represent the barbaric, self-indulgent turning from society that most of the boys embrace. Perhaps the most disturbing example of the conflict between the individual and society in the novel is Jack’s friend, Roger. In the early pages of the novel, Roger seems like a perfectly normal boy. In the book’s fourth chapter, however, a scene foreshadows the character’s turn from society. It is in this chapter that we see Henry, one of the “littluns,” playing with plankton on the beach. As the tide comes in, the plankton become trapped in the depression of Henry’s footprint. The little boy feels exhilarated at being in control of other living things. Unbeknownst to him, Roger watches from the jungle. The older
Lord of the Fliesâ•…â•… 493 boy begins to throw rocks at the younger, intentionally missing and forming a circle of rocks around him. Roger is, in essence, exerting the same control over Henry that Henry exerts over the plankton. He does not injure the smaller boy because his arm has been conditioned by the society they have been separated from. These societal rules soon fade from Roger’s mind, though. Toward the end of the novel, the earlier scene is mirrored when Roger murders Piggy with a boulder. Society’s rules no longer hinder his individual nature. Finally, a few symbols represent this interplay between the individual and society. The conch shell that first appears in the opening chapter symbolizes civilization. The boys use it to conduct their meetings, and only the boy holding the conch can speak. As the novel progresses, the boys’ journey away from society is shown in their disregard for the conch and its rules. This culminates in the destruction of the shell at Piggy’s death. Likewise, the signal fire points to the boys’ desire for the society they have left behind. As the hunters become more engrossed in killing, they forget to keep the fire ablaze and actually miss a chance at rescue. By this point, their desire for violence outweighs their desire for rules and peaceful coexistence. It appears that Golding is making the statement that humans are not innately moral beings; they naturally hunger for barbarism, violence, and power. In Golding’s novel, morality is imposed on the children by their society, and when the society is no longer there to police them, they revert to a more primitive state. It is only at the end of the novel, when faced with the prospect of returning to civilization, that they see where disregarding societal rules has taken them. Ryan Neighbors
Survival in Lord of the Flies
In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of schoolboys of various ages must survive on a deserted island after their plane is shot down as they try to escape Britain during World War II. The book centers around the attempts they make to survive, beginning with forming an island democracy and including the eventual turning from that democracy and its rules. In all, the boys take several steps to
guarantee their survival. These steps are taken to ensure their safety and to meet their basic needs. They include creating an island society, building shelter, starting a signal fire, and hunting. The boys create an island society to establish order on the island and to mirror the society they have left where they felt secure. They elect a leader, Ralph, and define the rules of their society, such as allowing only the person holding the conch shell to speak at meetings. Eventually, however, the boys turn their backs on the societal rules they have created, instead relying on their barbaric natures to ensure their survival. This turning from society begins with their disregarding the rule of the conch shell. It reaches its symbolic peak in the destruction of the conch shell toward the end of the novel. The first task the boys set about after creating their island society is to build shelters and gather food. Though all of the boys seem excited about the plan to build huts, only Ralph and Simon work to build them while the others play in the lagoon. This implies that while all of the boys want their basic needs met, only a couple of the older ones are willing to do what it takes to ensure their survival. Likewise, the boys set about gathering fruit to eat, though it is mainly just a few of the older ones who are willing to do this, as well. In addition to gathering fruit, many of the boys, led by Jack, opt to hunt for their food. This desire to hunt arises after Jack sees a sow, though it is several days before the sow will provide sustenance for them. Nevertheless, the hunt soon consumes many of the boys, leading to the fall of the island society. Early in the novel, Piggy, the voice of reason in the group, brings it to the others’ attention that it will likely be some time before they are rescued. This revelation frightens many of the children but eventually prompts them to create a signal fire on the mountain. In their first attempt at building the fire, the boys spend more time playing than actually attending to it. The fire begins to burn out of control, burning a large path through the forest and presumably killing one of the “littluns.” Eventually, the group, led by the hunters, is able to safely control the fire and let it continue to burn. However, much like their turning from their island society, the boys become so focused on hunting that they ultimately
494â•…â•… Gordimer, Nadine quit keeping up the signal fire, causing them to actually miss a chance at rescue. Once again, the boys turn their backs on all other aspects of survival in favor of the hunt. It is this avenue of survival—the hunt—that eventually engrosses most of the boys. The thrill they get from hunting intoxicates them, leading to a sort of bloodlust. It is exemplified in the frenzied, tribal dance that occurs after the killing of the sow. However, the bloodlust and barbarism they feel becomes generalized, not being focused solely on the island wildlife. The irony is that this method of surviving actually leads to the death of several boys, including Simon and Piggy. The savage nature of the hunters even makes Ralph run for his life as they try to kill him. This leads to the central point that Golding is trying to make: Human nature is inherently corrupt. In essence, he is saying that our natures are so corrupt that even the boys’ attempts at survival become twisted and lead to death, particularly in the case of hunting. What at one time was used for the benefit of all of the group actually results in the death of some of its members and forces the group’s former leader Ralph to escape his former followers. Because of this corrupt nature, no one is safe, and it is every man for himself. Ryan Neighbors
Gordimer, Nadineâ•… Burger’s Daughterâ•… (1979)
South African-born Nadine Gordimer’s 1979 novel, Burger’s Daughter, deals with the three themes of justice, race, and survival cyclically and extensively. Taking place within the sociopolitical climate of the massacres at Sharpeville in 1960 and Soweto in 1976, the dramatic events of Burger’s Daughter are recounted through the perspective of young Rosa Burger, daughter of Lionel and Cathy Burger. Descendants of white Dutch settlers who came to be known as Afrikaners, the Burgers become martyrs for the cause of racial equality and social justice for all South Africans. Lionel, a medical doctor, sees in communism what he believes is the solution to the problems plaguing South Africa, and he becomes an active member of the South African Communist
Party. Rosa’s parents are imprisoned and eventually die for their cause, and the young girl is left to carry on their legacy while crafting some semblance of a life for herself. Because of her family’s history of radical involvement in activist causes, she remains “Burger’s daughter” long after Lionel’s death and is placed under government surveillance for the rest of her life. The novel challenges readers with its stream of consciousness narrative threads, which simultaneously reflect the horrifying realities of time and place while representing Rosa’s innermost thoughts and perspectives. Walter Collins III
Justice in Burger’s Daughter
Tied closely to the issue of race, the notion of justice, or lack thereof, permeates Burger’s Daughter. Through the mind and eyes of Rosa Burger, readers learn of the ubiquitous injustices black South Africans confront due to lives lived in a prejudiced society. Rosa’s parents, Lionel and Cathy, are the agents through whom many of the issues of justice are exposed in the novel and their stances against inequality and discrimination based on race and economic situation leave them subject to recrimination by fellow Afrikaners who fail to view certain sociopolitical practices in South Africa as problematic. Early on, Rosa recalls her father’s speech, given in defense of fighting for black South Africans, during the course of one of his trials. For more than an hour, Lionel testifies to the injustices that abound in society. During his lifetime, he has witnessed bigotry in the schools, in religious organizations that proclaim to “worship the God of Justice [yet] practice discrimination on the grounds of the colour of skin,” and later, as a doctor, he observed unfair treatment of blacks in hospitals where he practiced. It is because of these situations that Lionel subscribes to Marxism. At one point in his speech, he asserts: “This contradiction that split the very foundation of my life, . . . in Marxism I found it analysed in another way: as forces in conflict through economic laws. I saw that white Marxists worked side by side with blacks in an equality that meant taking on the meanest of tasks . . . I saw whites prepared to work under blacks. Here was a possible solution to injustice to be sought outside the awful fallibility
Burger’s Daughterâ•…â•… 495 in any self-professed morality I knew.” Lionel risks everything, including his own life, as he holds to his personal convictions and his conception of justice while fighting against ever-present injustice. Gordimer’s story suggests that nothing short of a sweeping change of the ways in which things have always been handled will cause a change in Afrikaners’ minds concerning notions of societal justice and injustice. Marxism, with its attendant shift in personal viewpoints of perceived racial and social hierarchies, clearly evokes the idea of revolution. And while the Burger family stands strongly for such radical change to help the down and out of any race, Rosa is dubious that well-off whites will ever willingly espouse any such transformation. She realizes that “children the white couple would make in their whites’ suburb would [no longer] inherit the house bought on the municipal loan available only to whites, or slot safely into jobs reserved for whites against black competition.” Likewise, Rosa continues to be haunted by the sight of a white man dead on a park bench, seen one day during her lunch break, and she wants to believe that “when we had changed the world, . . . the ‘elimination of private conflicts set up by the competitive nature of capitalist society’ would help people to live, even people like this [dead man], who, although white and privileged under the law of the country, couldn’t make a place for himself.” The oppositions of life and death, privilege and disadvantage, justice and injustice cause Rosa to reflect on life’s inherent challenges, which seem to be overly magnified in the society she knows. Rosa even wrestles with the seeming meaninglessness of a life—a universal preoccupation—as depicted in the scene of the dead man in the park. She reckons: “Justice, equality, the brotherhood of man, human dignity—but [death] will still be there . . . .” Any semblance of justice— simply having a few things, working hard, or living life according to one’s desires—remains elusive in Burger’s Daughter. The Burgers’ collective fight for justice becomes all-consuming as details of their personal lives are slowly and almost completely erased by deeds done on behalf of those who are less fortunate. Even traditional celebrations hardly take place in their home as they fete instead “the occasions . . . when some-
body got off, not guilty, in a political trial. Leaders came out of prison. A bunch of blacks made a success of a boycott or defied a law. There was a mass protest or a march, a strike. . . .” Such “celebrations of justice” dot their lives as they continue to work toward comprehensive social change, understanding that complete justice lies somewhere in the days ahead: “There is nothing but failure, until the day the Future is achieved. It is the only success. Others—in specific campaigns with specific objectives, against the pass laws, against forced dispossession of land—would lead to piecemeal reforms . . . Failure is the accumulated heritage of resistance without which there is no revolution.” By the end of the text, it is clear that “No one knows where the end of suffering will begin.” While small victories are celebrated along the way, the novel’s concluding pages suggest that real South African justice remains uncertain. Walter Collins III
Race in Burger’s Daughter
Burger’s Daughter is a story of racial struggle. Because of their belief in racial equality, Lionel and Cathy Burger and daughter Rosa stand in stark contrast to the majority of whites, the Afrikaners, who populate South Africa. Their activism is the cause of frequent encounters with government officials. Indeed, as the novel opens, readers join Rosa in line, arms full of clothing and other provisions, outside a prison where detainees, including her mother, are held. The Burgers constantly expect prison detention, unfair court proceedings, and eventual martyrdom. Traitors, by most Afrikaners’ assessments, the family members reject what for them would be easy “[positive] reputation, success and personal liberty.” Instead they live and die for a revolution that “would change the lives of the blacks who left their hovels and compounds at four in the morning to swing picks, hold down jack-hammers and chant under the weight of girders, building shopping malls and office towers in which whites . . moved in an ‘environment’ without sweat or dust.” Filtered through Rosa’s stream-of-consciousness reflections, the novel illustrates the hardships of blacks during apartheid. In stores, blacks are routinely treated as secondclass citizens. In one scene, Dhladhla recounts his
496â•…â•… Gordimer, Nadine experience: “When I go into the café to buy bread they give the kaffir yesterday’s stale. When he goes for fruit, the kaffir gets the half-rotten stuff the white won’t buy. That is black.” Additionally, unlike whites, blacks are required to carry passbooks when in public. One of Lionel’s early realizations regarding the passbooks catalyzes his enduring mission for racial equality. Rosa recounts this moment of her father’s recognition: “Lionel once told me how when he was about fourteen and had just come to boarding-school in Johannesburg he saw torn-up passbooks in the street . . . and curiosity led him to realize for the first time that the ‘natives’ were people who had to carry these things while white people like himself didn’t.” Later, when a black father, Fats, contends that his son should be allowed to participate in sports and be seen as the equal to any big name international boxer, he receives this response: “Your boy can negotiate to go to Germany and America and hell. He’s still a ‘boy’ that’s been let out like a monkey on a string. . . . You’ll make a lot of money and he can show his medal with his pass when he gets back.” Not only does the future look bleak for this player, but also Gordimer demonstrates that South African blacks know that sports cannot solve national issues of racial inequality: “And if next year or the year after white soccer clubs play blacks, and take in black members, the soccer players will shout there’s no more racism in sport. But everywhere else in this country the black will still be a black. Whatever else he does he’ll still get black jobs, black education, black houses—.” Ubiquitous racism never deters the Burger family from attempts to mollify its effects. Their involvement with Baasie exemplifies the extent to which theirs is a personal cause. In a place where segregation and inequality rule, the Burgers take Baasie in and treat him like family. Baasie and Rosa fall asleep together in her bed at night, Baasie is educated illegally in Rosa’s private school and he is taught to swim and more. Baasie “fought for the anchorage of wet hair on Lionel Burger’s warm breast in the cold swimming-pool” as he is taught not only to swim but to claim freedom from what would be incapacitating fears even if his was a desegregated society. In adulthood, when Rosa again meets Baasie, she becomes aware of his bit-
terness over treatment of blacks by whites. With his own perspectives concerning South African racism and without gratitude to Rosa for her family’s earlier concerns, he rejects any white aid, sincere or otherwise: “I’m not your Baasie, just don’t go on thinking about that little kid who lived with you, don’t think of that black ‘brother’, that’s all—.” Baasie’s attitude reflects the attitudes of other blacks who feel that whites, no matter how pure their motives, can never really help blacks. Instead, for truly untainted lives, blacks must establish their own equality. In the end, readers realize that “All collaboration with whites has always ended in exploitation of blacks.” In Dhladhla’s words: “We must liberate ourselves as blacks, what has a white got to do with that?” Implicit in this notion is that South Africa’s hope and future lie with black citizens. Ancient black spirits interweave with contemporary black spirits working for freedoms today to convey that “Through blackness is revealed the way to the future.” And once blacks and whites escape wholly the oppression of apartheid everyone will find the way “to the only rendezvous that matters, the victory where there will be room for all.” Racially speaking, Burger’s Daughter ends on a guardedly hopeful note. Walter Collins III
Survival in Burger’s Daughter
Along with issues of race and justice, the issue of survival permeates Gordimer’s Burger’s Daughter. Lionel Burger dies in prison of nephritis in the third year of his life sentence for fighting for the equality of black South Africans. Cathy and Tony, Rosa’s mother and brother, face untimely deaths. But the complex notion of survival is embodied in Rosa’s life. The text makes it clear throughout that in her personal and professional dealings she will always be Burger’s daughter—eternally connected to her father’s ideals, principles, and controversial ideological stances. Rosa continues her father’s work, and in that very real existence she ensures the survival of the family’s cause. Considered from another angle, actual human survival becomes complicated as well, due to the promotion of divisive racial equality and social justice causes.
Burger’s Daughterâ•…â•… 497 At the beginning of the novel, Rosa is waiting in line in front of a prison to visit her mother. Within the first few pages, readers also learn that Rosa’s father is serving a life sentence in prison. The stability of the family might easily be compromised given the activist roles that Lionel and Cathy play. However, security and protection of their family are important to the Burgers even as fighting for racial and social equality is highly valued. Rosa recollects the strategies her parents purposely employed to ensure the survival of their family. She recalls: I think that while my mother was alive and my brother was a baby my parents arranged their activities so that one of them was in the clear, always, one would always have a good chance of being left behind to carry on the household if the other were arrested . . Then when my brother and mother were gone, there was me. If my father were to be arrested, there would always be me. Lionel and Cathy negotiated their activist roles in order to ensure the survival of their family members and the survival of their message. A card Rosa receives from her Auntie Velma and Uncle Coen Nels crystallizes the degree to which the influence of Lionel’s work to bring about equality will survive within the family. Velma and Coen, who had been strictly against Lionel’s efforts, offer for Rosa to come and stay at their farm whenever she would like or whenever she needs rest. Rosa states that [Velma] does not ask from what activity [I might seek rest,] she does not want to know in case it is, as her brother’s always was, something she fears and disapproves to the point of inconceivability . . . The Nels have never had any difficulty in reconciling pride in belonging to a remarkable family with the certainty that the member who made it so followed wicked and horrifying ideals . . . Whatever my father was to them, it still stalks their consciousness. In very apparent ways, the work of the Burger family survives and affects lives. In the end, one only
hopes that the Burgers’ struggle for equality will be realized for all. Survival in Burger’s Daughter encompasses the complexities of both race and social class. When Rosa observes a dead man in a park one day during her lunch break, she ponders the depths of inequality and divisiveness in South Africa. Rosa is astonished to learn in the newspaper the identity of this man who is “white and privileged under the law of the country.” Out of work, on hard times, and with no hope of securing gainful employment, this man finds it difficult to survive even as a white person: The paper said the man’s name was Ronald Ferguson, 46, an ex-miner, no fixed abode. He drank methylated spirits and slept in bus shelters. There is an element of human wastage in all societies. But—in [the Burgers’] house—it was believed that when we had changed the world . . .—the ‘elimination of private conflicts set up by the competitive nature of capitalist society’ would help people to live, even people like this one, who . . . couldn’t make a place for himself. If survival is difficult for this white, middle-aged man, then it becomes all the more difficult for black South Africans. Perhaps the incident in Burger’s Daughter that most distinctly demonstrates the difficulty of survival is the Soweto Uprising of June 1976. Near the end of the text, the narrator tells of the loss of life and the struggle to survive that many youth in Soweto faced following the riots: “The school riots filled the hospital; the police who answered stones with machine-guns and patrolled Soweto firing revolvers at any street-corner group of people encountered, who raided high schools and picked off the targets of youngsters escaping in the stampede, also wounded anyone else who happened to be within the random of their fire.” After a long catalogue of gruesome images of destruction, Burger’s Daughter closes on a note of measured hope that the noble objectives of the Burger family will live on to ensure not only the physical survival of the disenfranchised but also the betterment of life for all South Africans. Walter Collins III
498â•…â•… Grass, Gunter
Grass, Gunterâ•… The Tin Drumâ•… (1959)
Oskar Matzerath is undoubtedly one of the most remarkable characters in modern fiction. Both firstperson narrator and main character of The Tin Drum (1959), Oskar, a 30-year-old inmate of an asylum, relates his life story. Born, he claims, with fully developed intellectual abilities, he decides at the age of three, the age at which he acquires his first tin drum, to reject the adult world and to stop growing. In order to provide an explanation for his stunted growth, he says, he throws himself down the cellar stairs. Thus able to view the world from the perspective of a perpetual three-year-old, Oskar witnesses the rise and fall of Nazi Germany and the brutal events of World War II. As the war draws to a close, Oskar begins to grow again. In the final chapters of the book, Oskar recounts his family’s move from Danzig to West Germany and his experience from the postwar years up until his confinement in the mental institution. Grass employs a complex narrative structure for the novel, moving between first- and third-person narration. Oskar refers to himself as “I” but also as “Oskar,” as if he is speaking about another person. Oskar’s self-alienation, his status as a mental patient, and his often contradictory accounts of the past, make Oskar a very unreliable narrator. The reader must therefore question the truthfulness of his account, an autobiography that links the events of Oskar’s life to the catastrophes of the first half of 20th-century German history. Christina Kraenzle
Guilt in The Tin Drum
One of the novel’s central themes is the question of guilt. Oskar begins his account from the confines of a mental institution, where he has been incarcerated for the murder of Sister Dorothea Köngetter. Oskar denies the charge, but admits to an obsession with the nurse, giving considerable support to the case against him. However, on his 30th birthday there is a new development in the case. Oskar reports that fresh evidence suggests the murder was committed by a jealous, fellow nurse; the courts have recognized his innocence and he will soon be released. But as the reader by this point is keenly aware, Oskar is
an unreliable narrator, often changing his story to either admit or deny his complicity in past events. We cannot take this final claim of innocence at face value. Moreover, this is not the first death in which Oskar has been involved. Throughout the novel, Oskar claims responsibility for the deaths of his mother and his two “presumptive” fathers, Alfred Matzerath and Jan Bronski. The first to die is Oskar’s mother Agnes, who gorges herself on fish after discovering the pregnancy that may well be the result of her affair with Jan Bronski. While Oskar initially displays no signs of guilt, he later tells Roswitha Raguna that others hold him responsible. Later, Oskar suggests that he was exaggerating his account in an attempt to impress Roswitha. Still later, however, Oskar reports that he indeed overheard his grandmother blaming him, claiming that Agnes died because she could no longer stand Oskar’s drumming. Several chapters later, Oskar claims responsibility for both his mother’s and Jan Bronski’s death. Oskar offers a similarly contradictory account of Jan Bronski’s death. In the first version of the story, Oskar describes how Jan is driven away by the Germans and waves a last goodbye to Oskar. In the next chapter, however, Oskar declares that he must correct an omission, namely that when the Germans arrived, Oskar pretended to the soldiers that Jan Bronski had forced him into the post office in order to use him as a human shield. Subsequently, Bronski is beaten, taken away, and later executed. Oskar allegedly commits the act of treachery out of concern for his own comfort and safety and to protect his precious tin drums. In the case of Alfred Matzerath’s death, Oskar initially maintains that he takes the Nazi Party pin, which Matzerath has discarded, only to protect young Kurt. He ostensibly hands it back to Matzerath because he wishes to pick a louse from a Russian soldier’s collar. Matzerath panics, attempts to swallow the incriminating object, and chokes, prompting one of the soldiers to kill him. In the next chapter, however, Oskar changes his story and claims he deliberately exposed Matzerath’s party membership, and even opened the pin so that his father might choke on it.
The Tin Drumâ•…â•… 499 The amount of incriminating evidence that Oskar discloses at the very least suggests a guilty conscience. However, in each case, it is impossible to determine unequivocally the degree of Oskar’s guilt. Oskar changes his stories repeatedly; moreover, it is his version of events, and therefore subjective and possibly entirely of his own invention. He also freely admits to being a liar, as in the case of the Dusters’ trial, where he plays the role of innocent victim to avoid punishment. Furthermore, as a mental patient, all of Oskar’s recollections become highly questionable. Less compelling perhaps than Oskar’s individual guilt is the greater and more complex issue of collective guilt for the crimes of National Socialism. Oskar connects the two in his account of Jan Bronski’s death when he describes how he tries to assuage his guilty conscience. Here Oskar equates his personal feelings of guilt with the collective guilt of the nation. Like everyone else, he says, he soothes his guilty conscience by making excuses for past misdeeds. Later, he describes how he participates in discussions at the British Centre, where individuals talk about collective guilt so that later their consciences will be clear. Here, the novel casts doubt on the process of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (a German term meaning “coming to terms with the past”), suggesting that national debates about collective guilt have not effectively tackled questions of complicity, but simply help individuals to distance themselves from the past. Oskar’s autobiography, which oscillates between confession and denial of guilt, must be seen in this broader context. It thus offers a reflection on the complicated process of dealing with national responsibility for the crimes of Nazi Germany. Christina Kraenzle
Identity in The Tin Drum
One of the most striking features of The Tin Drum is the complexity of its main character, Oskar, a highly ambivalent figure who portrays himself alternately as naïve child and knowing adult, unwitting participant in events and active shaper of his own destiny, innocent bystander and complicit villain. He is also quite likely a madman, a possibility supported by a narrative structure that moves between first- and third-person narration. Oskar’s tendency
to refer to himself not as “I” but as “Oskar” suggests self-alienation and identity crisis. But the challenge of The Tin Drum is not to try to determine what constitutes the “real” Oskar, but rather to consider how these multiple identities coexist. The multiplicity of identities is introduced at the beginning of the novel when Oskar recalls his many outings to the cinema with Klepp, after which they have their passport photos taken. Oskar describes how he and Klepp manipulate the photos, folding or cutting them to combine old and new photographs or to merge the features of both men into new images of themselves. As a metaphor for identity, the montages that Oskar and Klepp create point to the multifaceted influences and self-identifications that make up Oskar’s character. They also suggest the constructedness of the images Oskar offers: Just as Oskar and Klepp fashion their own photographic images, Oskar, the autobiographer, creates multiple, and often conflicting, self-images in his written account. Oskar’s identity crisis is reflected in his obsessions about his parentage, in particular his uncertainty about which of his two “presumptive fathers” is in fact the biological one. While he at first suggests that Jan Bronski is his true father, he later suggests that it is most likely Alfred Matzerath. This uncertainty leads Oskar to refer to himself both as Oskar Matzerath and Oskar Bronski. He also takes the name Koljaiczek, after his maternal grandfather, with whom he also identifies. Oskar’s education under the tutelage of Gretchen Scheffler, who introduces him to both Goethe and Rasputin, also shapes his self-image. Oskar takes pages from the two books and shuffles them randomly to create a new volume that he reads throughout his life. Oskar alternately identifies with Goethe, who represents enlightenment and rationality, and with Rasputin, who represents darkness and irrationality. Oskar later asks Bruno to fashion a string figure that will combine the features of Oskar, Goethe, and Rasputin, symbolizing the two poles that constitute Oskar’s identity. His mother’s frequent visits to church introduce Oskar to religion, and he subsequently identifies with both Jesus and Satan. Oskar believes he resembles the figure of Jesus in the Church of the Sacred
500â•…â•… Grass, Gunter Heart; he later introduces himself to the Dusters as Jesus and becomes their leader. When the Dusters break into the church, Oskar has the Jesus figure removed and takes its place while mass is read. Later, the painter Raskolnikov will depict Oskar as Jesus. In his alleged sexual encounter with Sister Dorothea, however, Oskar claims to be Satan. Questions of identity are important also for a number of minor characters. Oskar’s maternal grandfather, Joe Koljaiczek, assumes the identity of Joe Wranka in order to escape the authorities. Haunted by his memories of Lucy Rennwand, Oskar believes he recognizes her in the person of Regina Raeck, a fellow refugee from Danzig. He continues to confuse their identities throughout the trip. He also confuses Leo Schugger and Willem Slobber, believing them to be the same person. Oskar’s neighbor, Mr. Münzer, calls himself Klepp because, like Oskar, he does not want to take his father’s last name. Oskar’s landlord exhibits a split personality, violently breaking liquor glasses and then carefully sweeping up the shards. In one passage, Oskar refers to these sides of his landlord’s personality with two different names: Oskar uses the nickname Hedgehog to refer to the landlord’s violent personality and his real name, Zeidler, to refer to his more orderly side. The theme of identity is also significant on a larger, national scale. As many commentators have noted, Oskar can be seen as an embodiment of the German nation. At one point Oskar notes that the two poles of his identity, represented by Goethe and Rasputin, always exist in tandem. This idea can also be applied to Germany, a nation that spawned numerous intellectuals and artists, but also Hitler and the Nazis. With its complicated main character and its depiction of how ordinary citizens support the rise of National Socialism, Grass’s The Tin Drum insists that polar opposites such as good and evil or rational and irrational cannot be easily separated. Instead, the potential for both enlightenment and brutality coexist in unsettling ways. Christina Kraenzle
Violence in The Tin Drum
Throughout his life, Oskar witnesses countless acts of violence and brutality. Oskar encounters many
violent individuals, and also observes the organized violence of the Nazi regime and the war. Grass’s novel thus connects the personal and the political, showing how ordinary citizens commit acts of brutality, both in the private and public sphere. As a child, Oskar is subjected to the cruelty of the neighborhood children who force him to eat a noxious soup made with live frogs, saliva, and urine. At his kindergarten, Stephan Bronski is viciously beaten by a boy named Lothar who refers to Stephan as “Polack,” thus alluding to the Polish-German tensions leading up to the war. After the war, Oskar encounters Zeidler, the rooming house landlord who flies into violent and seemingly unprovoked rages and shatters liquor glasses to vent his anger. Oskar also recounts how Meyn, irritated by the smell from his four tomcats, brutally attacks the animals with a fire poker and stuffs them, mortally wounded but still alive, into a garbage can. Meyn is later expelled from the SA for inhumane cruelty to animals, despite his involvement, Oskar says, in the events of Kristallnacht. Oskar then goes on to describe, in the final chapter of Book One, the Kristallnacht—known in English as Crystal Night or The Night of Broken Glass—the organized and systematic terrorizing of Jews that occurred throughout Germany and parts of Austria on November 9 and 10, 1938. Oskar recounts how his father, Alfred Matzerath, watches the events with approval, how men in uniform and civilian clothes participate in the destruction, and how firemen look on while the local synagogue burns. Oskar further describes how businesses, including Sigismund Markus’s toyshop, are vandalized, and recounts how Markus commits suicide before SA officers descend on his store. Oskar’s comment that Meyn is condemned for the violence against the cats, but celebrated for his participation in the violence against the Jewish population, illustrates the extent to which Nazis devalued and dehumanized the Jewish people. The participation of ordinary citizens in the events of Kristallnacht also show how anti-Semitic Nazi violence was condoned and even, in many cases, supported. As Oskar notes early in the novel, “where there is politics, there is violence.” As political tensions turn to war, Oskar witnesses countless acts of brutality. He is present during the bloody battle at the
The Heart of the Matterâ•…â•… 501 Polish post office; he stands by as Russian soldiers kill Alfred Matzerath; he watches Corporal Lankes senselessly murder a group of nuns, and he looks on as Roswitha Raguna is hit by a stray shell during an Allied attack. Oskar also relates numerous cases of violence against women. Herbert Truczinski is killed in his attempt to sexually assault the figure of Niobe in the Danzig Maritime Museum. Oskar witnesses the rape of Lina Greff by Russian soldiers, attesting to the prevalence of sexual violence in situations of war. In the postwar years, Lankes repeatedly beats his girlfriend, Ulla, and later, on his trip with Oskar to Normandy, sexually assaults a nun. Oskar’s alleged sexual encounter with Sister Dorothea, who is later found murdered, can also be interpreted as an assault. While Oskar is often a witness to violent events, he is more than simply an innocent bystander. Although he insists on his innocence in the case of Sister Dorothea, he may well be her murderer. Spurned by Maria, he physically assaults her after he learns of her affair with Alfred Matzerath and subsequently tries to abort her pregnancy by causing her to fall from a ladder. Later, he plans to stab her in the belly with a pair of scissors, but is prevented when Maria notices his intentions. During the war, Oskar becomes the leader of the Dusters and although he claims not to participate in their attacks on their rivals, he accepts their activities. As a child, Oskar exhibits a violent temper, especially when anyone threatens to take away his tin drum. He responds by shattering glass with his voice, an act that is reminiscent of landlord Zeidler’s violent fits of rage or the violence and destruction of Kristallnacht. Toward the end of the novel, Oskar witnesses an attack on Victor Weluhn, carried out by three men who claim to be fulfilling an execution order issued in 1939 for Victor’s involvement in the defense of the Polish post office. Although the war is long over, the men insist on carrying out this former obligation. Here Grass satirizes misplaced notions of duty and order. Throughout the novel, countless acts of private and public violence attest to the potential for savagery that underlies apparently well-ordered society. Christina Kraenzle
Greene, Grahamâ•… The Heart of the Matterâ•… (1948)
The Heart of the Matter is one of 20th-century British Catholic writer Graham Greene’s most widely considered to be masterpieces. It concerns the efforts of police officer Henry Scobie to lead a just life amid suffering, corruption, and temptation at an unidentified British colony in Africa during World War II. Over the course of the novel, Scobie suffers a gradual descent from justice, a descent motivated by pity and pride. Because he pities a Portuguese ship captain, Scobie destroys a letter that he should have reported to the commissioner; because he pities his emotionally crippled wife, Louise, he sends her to South Africa with the proceeds of a compromising loan from a black marketeer named Yusef; and because he pities shipwreck survivor Helen Rolt, he begins an affair with her. In an effort to maintain the reputation his devotion to justice has earned him, he hides his affair and his connection with Yusef, to the point that he allows the murder of possibly the only person he truly loves, his young servant Ali. Unable to bear his fall from grace, he commits suicide by overdosing on a heart medicine. Though Greene himself considered it a failure, the novel has been admired for its rich evocation of the self-defeating conflicts that attend the human search for a code to live by. Scott Daniel
Futility in The Heart of the Matter
The sense of the futility of all human endeavor pervades Graham Greene’s The Heart of the Matter. The novel’s closing implies a static future as effectively as its opening conveys the sense of an unchanging past, so that the story itself, chronicling Scobie’s misguidedly heroic efforts to help others, is the story of change imploding, collapsing upon itself, quashed by the very forces it sets in motion. The stability of Henry Scobie’s situation—epitomized by his being passed over for a position that he is, by all appearances, eminently qualified for: commissioner—rests upon a distorted stoicism that is in a sense inaction or indifference disguised as justice. While faultlessly performing his duties as public servant, Scobie wallows in futility, gluttonously savoring his lack of advancement, Louise’s
502â•…â•… Greene, Graham desperation, and the moral, human squalor of his environment. It is not until the incident on a ship called the Esperança—that is, hope—that Scobie becomes unmoored from this stability. Hiding the captain’s infraction of the maritime code gives him the opportunity to act on his frozen grief for his daughter, who died at school in England several years before the novel begins, and this sets in motion his hopeless battle with fate. He borrows money to send his wife to South Africa; he begins an affair with shipwreck survivor Helen Rolt. Through these actions Scobie puts himself at the mercy of the Syrian trader Yusef. Like Iago in Shakespeare’s Othello, Yusef has an almost preternatural knowledge of Scobie’s personality and his actions, so that every attempt Scobie makes to improve his life or that of those around him—most particularly, his wife Louise and mistress Helen Rolt, but even that of the Esperança’s captain—further enmeshes him in a trap. Yusef ’s blackmailing and double dealing is but a visible correlative of the psychological and spiritual futility of Scobie’s actions, most tellingly revealed in how quickly his relationship with Helen becomes a carbon copy of his relationship with Louise. A criminal by profession, Yusef is a sort of guarantor of permanent stasis, and just so, he becomes more powerful the more Scobie attempts change. Until he is moved to act, Scobie has a certain empty acceptance, if not contentment, that belies the term futility, which carries a heavy psychic burden. That burden is upon Louise, whose exasperation with their lack of advancement borders on the hysterical. In some sense, Louise is Scobie’s pain, is where Scobie hurts, and his sending her away is a logical means of freeing them both of that burden. The boy Ali is where Scobie feels peace, and Scobie dreams of happy calm times with him in the future. It is a measure of the futility of human affairs that instead of settling into the peace of a narrowed life with his loyal and innocent servant, Scobie immediately falls in love with Helen Rolt, who has already become the new locus of his pain, and begins an affair that will result in Ali’s death. From the novel’s perspective, it is futility and not justice that governs human events. Indeed, this point is made early in the novel. Approaching first
the courts and then the police station, Scobie sees this system as being full of grandiloquence but ultimately lacking strength. Justice, then, is futility. Henry Scobie governs his life with a rigorous Stoic philosophy, but he leaves one of the central tenets of that philosophy unexamined. The Stoic does his duty, but he also accepts that it is only his justice, and not the justice of the universe, that is within his control. Once moved to action, Scobie cannot accept his lack of power. In the end, human futility is but a foil for the glacial but certain movement of the church toward the fulfillment of God’s promise, and Greene’s intent, as we see with other themes the novel addresses, is to create a picture of a Christianity that is meaningful and convincing, if not compelling, to his existentialist contemporaries. In The Heart of the Matter, the only efficacious action is sacramental, and its power is love, such that, having avoided it for as long as he could in life, Henry Scobie may not even be able to escape it in death, as the priest suggests to Louise that even a suicide may not be beyond God’s mercy and grace. Scott Daniel
Religion in The Heart of the Matter
The Heart of the Matter is, of course, a novel about religion. Graham Greene foregrounds Catholic concerns; indeed, much of the dramatic tension of the plot depends on the characters’ belief in the Catholic vision of human life. Scobie believes his immortal soul is imperiled in that he will not repent his affair with Helen Rolt; Louise returns from her rest in South Africa because she believes her husband’s immortal soul is at risk; the tension is to a degree resolved, the tragedy of the protagonist’s suicide diffused, by the priest’s closing words to Louise about the unfathomable mystery of God’s grace. The novel’s closing scene is an informal theological dialogue between the confused and grieving widow and Father Rank. The conversation seems to match legalistic against mysterious Catholicism. Louise, fearing to hope for a man who has taken his own life, finds the comfort of despair in calling her husband a “bad Catholic” who must have known that he was sinning. Consistently, Rank removes religion from the institution of the church and
The Heart of the Matterâ•…â•… 503 from the doctrines and toward matters of the heart. He claims that both the human heart and God’s mercy are unknowable. This scene illustrates the importance of religion in the novel, as our sense of a resolved plot depends upon our accepting the terms of the debate. Thus, the Catholic faith exerts its influence not merely on the characters’ minds but also on the text of the narrative. Greene artfully conveys a Christian view of evil in the scene in which Scobie and Helen first kiss. It is not a matter so much of him seducing her or her seducing him but of the two of them being seduced by a moment. As is so often true, the narrator’s comment on this turn of events gives it a Catholic pall; he says that the apparent “safety” of their relationship was actually “the camouflage of an enemy.” Here, temptation is revealed to be demonic and malevolent. It is one thing to say that Yusef and Wilson are devil figures in the novel, but Greene goes further, with a vision of a sentient, supernatural evil that works through seduction and deception. In a similar vein, it is one thing to say that Ali is a Christ figure, but Greene’s character assumes a divine grace attendant upon the crucifixion and resurrection of the actual Christ. The same Christian perspective is evident in Scobie’s character flaw. In many respects, he is a typical tragic hero and can be read profitably as such: He is a man of high rank who is not entirely good or bad; he has a character flaw that leads him to an act of hubris, or excessive pride that precipitates his downfall and has consequences that extend beyond the individual. Scobie lacks a clear moment of selfrecognition, though a Christian recasting of such a moment might be implied by Father Rank’s closing remarks. If self-recognition is the grace note of the Greek tragic hero, then the priest holds out the possibility that in God’s grace Scobie will after death see his sin clearly enough to finally be able to repent it. Like his self-recognition, Scobie’s hubris is colored by faith. What he seems most to be guilty of is a pride that masquerades as compassion and virtue. The text observes: “Virtue, the good life, tempted him in the dark like a sin.” He believes that he is important, that he can make a sacrifice that in its way exceeds that of Christ, for he is risking eternal death to provide a little solace to others. Even worse,
Scobie understands the consequences of his actions, he even recognizes his own self-destructiveness, but he never seems to see the pride that taints his perspective. The pride of good works is a uniquely Christian vice, a moral trap that one finds along the path of virtue. The reader sees by the end of the novel that Scobie’s heroic virtue is also his undoing, that his humility is partial and blind and does not prevent the inflation of ego that makes tragedy possible. The very tenor of the novel’s emotions, then, would not be possible without the Catholic faith of the author and his characters. In Greene it is always evident that, ultimately, it is only with defective vision that one sees a universe where, as for the existential hero, the absurd fact of our existence precludes any possible meaning. Scobie suffers because life does have a meaning, a religious dimension, that he can neither reject nor embrace. Scott Daniel
Suffering in The Heart of the Matter
Suffering is a palpable atmospheric effect in Graham Greene’s The Heart of the Matter. It is as geographic and meteorological as it is psychological. His title, perhaps a play on Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, points to an understanding of this setting as a metaphor for a universal human condition. Indeed, if one thinks of the title as an implied riddle, and asks what lies at the heart of the matter, suffering might well be the answer. Every character copes with suffering differently and, indeed, suffering treats each character differently, taking the measure of his or her soul. Harris’s relatively shallow suffering is a function of idleness, and the solution is to turn killing cockroaches into a sport, a sort of poor man’s lacrosse. While his suffering is all but alleviated by this game, his neighbor Wilson has a surplus of suffering that a mere pastime, however violent and competitive, will not assuage. His suffering has a shallowness of its own, though, as he pursues an emotional affair with Louise for largely egotistical reasons. For him, besting Scobie in a romantic rivalry is sufficient succor. His fulfillment hinges, then, on one person, on Louise. Not so Louise: Her loneliness is of epic proportions. Though in many ways crippled by her suffering, she
504â•…â•… Haley, Alex, and Malcolm X is a remarkable judge of character, viscerally perceiving her husband’s emotional dryness and intellectually unraveling Wilson’s fundamental dishonesty. She imagines that only a whole nation can satisfy her want, and thus goads her husband to send her to South Africa. Louise’s case highlights the fact that, ultimately, each character’s response to suffering is inadequate. Each seeks a superficial remedy, whereas suffering is a condition of existence. This discrepancy between the scope of the problem and the manner of coping is nowhere more evident than in the novel’s protagonist, Henry Scobie. His stoic devotion to duty and justice above all else empowers him to repress his own hurt, but then his wife, Louise (and later, his mistress, Helen Rolt) becomes for him nothing more than the voice of his own inner pain. For this reason, he thinks he can get rid of his suffering by getting rid of her. His actions and his daydreams are both reflective of this mentality. In contrast to Louise, Scobie views emotional isolation as a solution to suffering. For him, the problem is larger than even a country. It is the world, before which he stands isolated and weary. Since the heart that is the heart of the matter is geographical as well as psychological, the West African natives are also native to suffering. For them, suffering is just the medium in which they operate. It is not something to be coped with or striven against. Scobie sees this fundamental difference between the colonists and the natives, and for him it is the principal appeal of his assignment. He reflects: “Nobody here could talk about a heaven on earth . . . on this side flourished the injustices, the cruelties, the meanness that elsewhere people so cleverly hushed up. Here you could love human beings nearly as God loved them, knowing the worst.” Succinctly and concisely, Greene’s prose accomplishes a devastating critique of Western civilization, for here it appears to be nothing more than an accretion of inadequate and essentially self-deceptive coping mechanisms. The suffering abides, only in disguised form. Western man, then, is alienated from his own condition in a way that the native is not. Ironically, it is this alienation that enables his image of himself as a savior of the native, or even, more modestly, as a counselor. Though a detective, Scobie seems engaged in some-
thing more like social work, and it is telling in this regard that he is often slow to realize how shrewdly the natives deceive the colonial authorities. However ideal the natives might appear to Scobie, the novel ultimately does not endorse their casual acceptance of suffering. Instead, it is Louise Scobie who finds the right balance. There is a world of difference between the Louise who returns from South Africa and the Louise who left, perhaps because upon learning of Henry’s infidelity, she reorients herself from reliance on her husband to reliance on the Catholic Church. She returns, then, not as Scobie’s savior but as his ally, encouraging him to attend mass and confession and showing a merciful tolerance of his human failings. Louise seems especially forgiving as contrasted to Scobie’s self-damnation or to the lovesick accusations of the diabolical Wilson. Their loathing is part and parcel of their suffering, which comes from seeking to be God (as savior on Scobie’s hand, and as judge on Wilson’s) rather than submitting to Him. Scott Daniel
Haley, Alex, and Malcolm Xâ•… The Autobiography of Malcolm Xâ•… (1965)
Malcolm X’s autobiography describes a life of multiple transformations, figurative deaths, and rebirths, which give his story a mythic quality. Born Malcolm Little in Nebraska, Malcolm and his family moved to Michigan after his birth. The murder of his father led to the dissolution of his family. After time in a detention home, Malcolm moved to Roxbury, Massachusetts with his half-sister, Ella, where the evolution of his identity was set in motion. With Shorty as his mentor, Malcolm conked his hair, donned a zoot suit, and metamorphosed into Red. In Harlem, under the tutelage of West Indian Archie, Malcolm developed into Detroit Red, a prominent member of a criminal syndicate. His stint in prison led him to Elijah Muhammad’s Nation of Islam, within which he became Minister Malcolm X. After his fallout with the Nation, Malcolm made his pilgrimage to Mecca and returned El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz. These name-changes represent fundamental shifts in Malcolm’s worldview. Much of his story’s
The Autobiography of Malcolm Xâ•…â•… 505 power comes from the fact that he wrote it while internalizing facts about Elijah Muhammad and the Nation that he had been unable to let himself see. His pilgrimage solidified other suspicions he had harbored about Elijah Muhammad, and undermined sweeping indictments of whites that he had previously made. Thus, in addition to a testimony to the impact of racism, the power of education, and the way an individual’s life is defined by meaningful work, The Autobiography of Malcolm X documents an evolving consciousness and offers authenticity to the notion of “self-discovery.” Jeffrey Bickerstaff
Education in The Autobiography of Malcolm X
Malcolm X hoped his autobiography would be read as a testimony to how ghetto conditions shape the minds and lives of millions of black Americans. Malcolm refers to his life as “the life of only one ghetto-created Negro.” Although Malcolm X was in many ways exceptional, readers should recognize how his early educational experiences mirror those of many blacks throughout America. Malcolm describes how during junior high in Michigan his history textbook contained exactly one paragraph on Negro history. The paragraph told the story of slavery and emancipation while perpetuating such cruel stereotypes as shiftlessness and stupidity. His history teacher, Mr. Williams, laughed through the reading before adding his own note about the enormity of Negro feet. Another teacher integral to Malcolm’s educational experience was Mr. Ostrowski, a teacher Malcolm describes as a self-appointed adviser. Mr. Ostrowski advises seventh-grade class president Malcolm Little, whose grades are among the highest in the school, that it is unrealistic for him to aspire to be a lawyer. Mr. Ostrowski patronizingly encourages Malcolm to work with his hands and become a carpenter. He assures Malcolm that his popularity would garner him plenty of work. Malcolm X describes this interaction as the first major turning point in his life, and notes that afterward he drew away from white people, his job, and school. As a teenager Malcolm moves to Boston and befriends a studious girl named Laura. Laura’s inter-
est in science elicits in Malcolm regret over turning away from the books he had enjoyed in Michigan. Laura insists that Malcolm could pick up where he was and become a lawyer. Instead, Malcolm embraces the life of a “hustler” and finds himself taking that path to Harlem. In Harlem, Malcolm, now known as Red, runs numbers for the West Indian mobster, Archie. Remembering Archie’s mathematical genius, Malcolm X asserts that Archie’s talents were wasted by society because he was black. Malcolm describes his criminal friends as victims of the American social system. Crammed into ghettos, blacks could aspire to nothing beyond survival. Malcolm recalls his friends as individuals who might have cured cancer, built industries, or explored space (93). Malcolm’s account of how his ambitions were dismissed invites the reader to speculate that Archie and the other so-called criminals each had a “Mr. Ostrowski” in their life stories. Malcolm X describes this criminal version of himself as “mentally dead.” He estimates that his working vocabulary then was less than 200 words, and after arriving in prison he begins to confront how street life had erased all he had learned in school. In prison, Malcolm admires a prisoner named Bimbi, the first man he had ever seen command total respect solely on the merits of his words. Bimbi encouraged Malcolm to take advantage of the library and correspondence courses, and influenced Malcolm to study word derivations. Malcolm chronicles his transformation within the walls of the Norfolk Prison Colony. His sister, Ella, had worked to secure his transfer to the progressive jail with no bars and a library donated by a millionaire named Parkhurst, whose particular interests were history and religions. Malcolm X describes this phase of his reading as an attempt to obtain “some kind of homemade education.” He transcribes the dictionary to build a foundation of knowledge and can soon read a book and understand its meaning. Malcolm X describes the new world then opening for him, and reflects that the ability to read stirred in him “some long dormant craving to be mentally alive.” His careful study of religion and history facilitates Malcolm’s rebirth. Malcolm would draw on, as
506â•…â•… Haley, Alex, and Malcolm X he would say, his “stock of knowledge” in his work as a human rights advocate. At the end of the story, Malcolm mourns his lack of a formal education. And here, at the end of his life, after several transformations, Malcolm knows he would have been a good lawyer. With his “homemade education,” though, Malcolm X creates a model for young scholars to follow in order to realize the historical basis of social injustice and realistically confront it. Had Malcolm taken Mr. Ostrowski’s advice, or had he taken Mr. Williams’s mockery of Negro history to heart, he would never have undertaken his life’s work. These two teachers worked to keep Malcolm ignorant and in his place. When Malcolm recognized the connection between knowledge and power and how it had been wielded against him and other “ghetto-created Negroes,” his education began. Jeffrey Bickerstaff
Suffering in The Autobiography of Malcolm X
In his autobiography, Malcolm X describes how periods of great suffering yielded personal transformations in his life. His world was first shattered at the age of six when his father’s skull was crushed and his body nearly cut in half. Blacks in town whispered that Earl Little had been attacked and laid over streetcar tracks. The insurance company, however, claimed that he committed suicide and refused to pay on his policy. Malcolm’s mother, Louise, devastated and alone with eight children and no money, struggled to maintain her family. Her condition deteriorated over the next six years, and she was eventually committed to the state mental hospital. Malcolm recounts how even after their mother was gone, his family tried desperately to stay together, but the state prevailed and Malcolm and his siblings were separated from one another. They became “state children” under the authority of a judge in Lansing: “a white man in charge of a black man’s children! Nothing but legal, modern slavery.” Malcolm uses this comparison to emphasize the history of black families being controlled and undermined by the white power structure. Readers should recognize the similarity of his situation to the agony wrought by the practice of selling members of slave families to different masters throughout the country.
Malcolm’s story shows that breaking up black families continued after emancipation, and he notes that “ours was not the only case of this kind.” With his foundation gone, Malcolm slid into a world of drugs and crime until, just shy of his 21st birthday, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison for his role in a burglary ring. In prison, Malcolm became a serious reader and devoured books dealing with the history of slavery. He began to contextualize his personal suffering within the greater struggle of his people, and stresses in his autobiography that the factors leading to his incarceration were typical for many black Americans. Reflecting on his time in prison, Malcolm explains why he and other prisoners embraced Elijah Muhammad’s Nation of Islam with such fervor. Malcolm describes the typical convert as a man put into a cage by a white judge. He says, “Usually the convict comes from among those bottom-of-thepile Negroes, the Negroes who through their entire lives have been kicked about, treated like children.” Years of oppression through institutional racism make them “the most perfectly preconditioned to hear the words, ‘the white man is the devil.’↜” The intensity with which Malcolm believed this doctrine is reflected by the turmoil he feels later when his faith in Elijah Muhammad is shattered. Malcolm describes the myths that comprise Elijah Muhammad’s racial cosmology. Years after he had first heard them in prison, he learns that these “tales” had infuriated eastern Muslims. Malcolm countered that their own failure to make “real Islam known in the West” created “a vacuum into which any religious faker could step and mislead our people.” Malcolm’s word choice, “faker,” indicates how intensely he feels betrayed by Elijah Muhammad. Malcolm’s faith was destroyed not by Mr. Muhammad’s adultery, but his willingness “to hide, to cover up what he had done.” Malcolm asserts that the Nation diverted members’ attention from the scandal toward him. “Hating me was going to become the cause for people of shattered faith to rally around.” Malcolm’s break with the Nation caused him torments beyond description. He wandered “in a state of emotional shock” until he began to recognize that he “had believed in Mr. Muhammad more than
The Autobiography of Malcolm Xâ•…â•… 507 he believed in himself.” This realization provided Malcolm with the strength to face the facts of his life and think autonomously. In Mecca, he grasped the danger of considering anyone “divinely guided” and “protected” and declared himself finished with “someone else’s propaganda.” The suffering that preceded this intellectual emancipation exemplifies Malcolm’s dictum that “it is only after the deepest darkness that the greatest joy can come; it is only after slavery and prison that the sweetest appreciation of freedom can come.” His anguish also indicates that revolution “means the destroying of an old system, and its replacement with a new system.” Malcolm recognizes that both the destruction that precedes creation, and the suffering that comes before renewal, are two distinct phases of the same process, which comprises life. Jeffrey Bickerstaff
Work in The Autobiography of Malcolm X
Malcolm describes his father as a Baptist minister committed to organizing for Marcus Garvey’s Universal Negro Improvement Association. Although Malcolm rejected Christianity and embraced Islam, the winding path of his life led him back to his father’s footsteps. After experiencing firsthand the limited range of choices available to young blacks, Malcolm’s life came to be defined by his work as a minister dedicated to improving the lives of black people. For Malcolm, honesty, dignity, and work were inextricably linked. As a youth in Roxbury, he scorned blacks who affected impressive job titles. Neighbors described a bank janitor as being “in banking” and a bond-house messenger as “in securities.” Cooks and maids assumed a haughty tone when describing themselves as being “with an old family.” Annoyed by such dishonesty, Malcolm would later work to puncture “the indignity of that kind of self-delusion.” However, Malcolm’s early experiences with work necessarily involved affectation. Hooked up with a shoe-shining “slave” (a hipster term that meant job), Malcolm soon learned that whites tipped generously when he would “Uncle Tom a little,” which included making the shine rag “pop like a
firecracker.” This sound was part of his hustle, “a jive noise” that gave the impression he was exerting more effort than he was. Malcolm also applied this practice to his railroad waiter job. He quickly surmised that white people would buy anything if he gave them a show. Malcolm describes himself and his coworkers as “servants and psychologists.” Cognizant of white people’s delusions of self-importance, their work required them to compromise their dignity and “Uncle Tom” for whites eager to pay for a show of black inferiority. Malcolm’s route between Boston and New York led to his involvement with Harlem’s underworld. Malcolm ran numbers, peddled drugs, and steered clients toward prostitutes. These clients, wealthy white men, used Harlem as “their sin-den, their fleshpot.” Malcolm describes how they took off the “dignified masks they wore in their white world” to indulge their sexual perversities. Consequently, white talk about the Negro’s “low morals” angered Malcolm. Malcolm came to see how America’s racial system created Harlem, where, instead of finding meaningful work that benefited the community, almost everyone “needed some kind of hustle to survive.” These hustles catered to whites’ illicit appetites, which perpetuated the residents’ need to “stay high” to forget all they had to do to survive. Thus, the racial structure created a cycle that coerced blacks into ghettoes and forced them to do whatever was necessary to endure. The white beneficiaries of this system could then indulge their appetites for drugs and flesh by exploiting blacks desperate to sustain themselves, while deriding them for having low morals. Malcolm’s criminal career culminated in his burglary conviction. He converted to Islam in prison, and upon his release he worked to spread a doctrine of black self-reliance. Malcolm saw firsthand how white merchants in ghettos drained money out of the black community. As a minister in the Nation of Islam, Malcolm recognized that Muslim-owned grocery stores exemplified how blacks could break their dependence on white money by hiring and trading among themselves. Malcolm stresses that the key to black self-respect is the building of their own businesses and decent homes.
508â•…â•… Hansberry, Lorraine After leaving the Nation, Malcolm still adhered to the philosophy of economic self-determination: “It’s because black men don’t own and control their own community’s retail establishments that they can’t stabilize their own community.” He established the Muslim Mosque, Inc., to combine his economic outlook with the goal of ridding his community of the vices that undermine its moral fiber. Malcolm never forgot that economic subservience fosters a desperation that leaves people prone to lascivious exploitation. In his last chapter, Malcolm reminds us that he was raised with Marcus Garvey’s Black Nationalist teachings. Like his father before him, Malcolm worked to instill in his community racial dignity and the confidence to stand for itself. The concept of work permeates The Autobiography of Malcolm X. His dedication page acknowledges that the sacrifices and understanding of his wife and children made his work possible. His father’s murder, his time as a criminal, and the enmity caused by his split with the Nation of Islam convinced Malcolm that he would die young and violently. Thus, he regarded his mission as urgent, and lived every day with the knowledge that “no man is given but so much time to accomplish whatever is his life’s work.” Jeffrey Bickerstaff
Hansberry, Lorraineâ•… A Raisin in the Sunâ•… (1959)
Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun debuted on Broadway on March 11, 1959. The title comes from the opening lines of “Harlem,” a poem by Langston Hughes that catalogs what happens when dreams are deferred. Dreams figure largely in the play, as the Younger family struggles to achieve its dream of economic and social freedom. The play takes place in Chicago’s South Side sometime between World War II and 1959, and is staged completely within a small, dilapidated apartment over the course of a couple of weeks. The play centers on the Younger family: Lena, a widow, her children, Walter, an ambitious chauffeur, Beneatha, a college student who wants to be a doctor, Walter’s wife Ruth, and their son Travis.
When the play opens, the family is waiting for a $10,000 insurance check, and each family member has a different plan for the money. Walter dreams of investing the money in a liquor store. Lena wants to buy a house for the family. After Walter hounds his mother and tells her that he wants to be the man of the house, Lena gives him $6,500: $3,000 to put away for Beneatha’s studies and $3,500 to start his business. However, on the day that the family is set to move into their new house, Walter learns that he was scammed out of $6,500. Their troubles increase when Karl Lindner, a representative of their new neighborhood, tells them that they are not wanted in all-white Clybourne Park. The play ends with the family deciding to move into their new home. Courtney Marshall
The American dream in A Raisin in the Sun
The Younger family, Ruth, Walter Lee, Travis, Beneatha, and Lena, are like any other American family: They want success, respect, and a home. Simply stated, they are in pursuit of the American dream. In Lorraine Hansberry’s play A Raisin in the Sun, written in 1958, the Younger family struggles to realize the American dream by escaping from ghetto life on the South Side of Chicago. Every member of the Younger family has a separate, unfulfilled dream—Ruth, a home for her family; Beneatha to become a doctor; and Walter Lee simply wants enough money to provide for his wife and children. These dreams mostly involve money. In the 1950s when A Raisin in the Sun takes place, the stereotypical American dream was to have a house with a yard, a big car, and a happy family. The Youngers aspire to this dream, but their struggles are different from the struggles a non-AfricanAmerican family living at the same time might have had, simply because being middle class for the Youngers is also a dream. Symbolic of the American dream is the plant Mama lovingly cares for throughout the play. For Mama this plant symbolizes the garden she will tend after moving into her dream house. The last thing that happens on stage is that Mama opens the door, comes back in, grabs her plant, and goes out for the last time. This small potted plant is a temporary stand-in for Mama’s much larger dream
A Raisin in the Sunâ•…â•… 509 and her care for the plant represents not only her protection of her dream but also her care and protection of her family. She cares for the plant just as she cares for her family: just enough light and water to grow. The plant remains feeble and spindly in spite of Mama’s love and care, simply because there is so little light. Likewise, Mama’s dream of a house and better life for her family is tenuous simply because it is difficult for her to see beyond her family’s day to day situation. Beneatha’s dream, to become a doctor, is different from Mama’s in that it is more self-serving, more indulgent. Her desire to express herself sets Beneatha apart from the other women in A Raisin in the Sun. She is the least traditional of the women not only because she is the youngest, but also because she is more independent, career oriented, and does not want to rely entirely on George Murchison to provide for her. Beneatha believes in education as a means to success and understanding, and her version of the American dream is centered on this philosophy. It is her attitude toward her boyfriend, George Murchison, in contrast to her attitude toward Joseph Asagai, an African friend, where Beneatha’s search for the American dream can be most clearly seen. Mama and Ruth are confused by her dislike of George Murchison, and Beneatha even indicates to them that she might not get married, something that runs counter to the more traditional, stay-at-home roles that most women fulfilled in the 1950s. Beneatha’s version of the American dream is solitary, less traditional, and not as concerned with family; hers is a less conservative version of the American dream. While the theme of the American dream is found throughout Hansberry’s play, the central conflict of the play is found in Walter’s idea of what the American dream entails. The concept of the “self-made man,” who starts with nothing, works hard, and achieves great wealth, seems innocuous enough. However, the idea becomes destructive when it evolves into an idolization of wealth and power. A life insurance check from his father, Walter Sr., means Walter Jr. can buy his way into a business and out of a servile job. In the beginning of A Raisin in the Sun Hansberry shows how Walter Jr. envies Charlie Atkins’s dry-cleaning business because it
grosses $100,000 a year. Desperate to achieve success, Walter ignores his mother’s moral objection to achieving his goals by running a liquor store. However, the liquor store is merely a means to an end for Walter. Walter’s dream, like his mother’s, is to escape the South Side ghetto, and to provide a better life for his wife and child. The Younger family’s dreams and aspirations for a better life are not confined to their race, but are identified with by people of all backgrounds. Although the definition of the American dream is different for each character, the underlying motivation is universal: the opportunity for a better life. Sharon Brubaker
Family in A Raisin in the Sun
The Younger family is under a great deal of emotional and financial stress in the play. Hansberry highlights the claustrophobic nature of their lives by staging the play completely within their small, rundown apartment. In the play, family roles break down along gender lines. The female characters in the play argue over the best ways to care for the male family members. Lena and Ruth bump heads about the best way to take care of Travis. Lena makes his bed for him and questions Ruth about what she’s feeding him for breakfast. Early in the play, Ruth tells Walter to eat the eggs she’s prepared, and he uses the phrase “eat your eggs” to symbolize the ways that he feels disrespected in the family. Walter imagines whenever a man gets excited about an opportunity that will change his and his family’s life, the women in his life come along and tell him to settle down. They think they are nourishing him by feeding him, but what he really wants is an understanding ear. For him, family limits him and keeps him from fulfilling his individualistic dream to own a liquor store. This individual dream is in stark contrast to the women’s communal dream of owning a home. The most important symbol in the play, Lena’s houseplant, also represents the resilience of family and the difficulties of caring for and nurturing living things. At the beginning of the play, Lena moves directly toward the plant to take care of it. Though the plant never gets enough light in their dark apartment, she is impressed with its tenacity. This quality
510â•…â•… Hansberry, Lorraine runs through her family. Though she and her late husband, Big Walter, had to flee southern violence and racism, she still manages to care for her children and grandson. The plant also symbolizes the dream she has to own a home. She wants to plant her family in richer soil in order to give them, especially Travis, the opportunities that she never had. Lena becomes upset because she thinks that her children, particularly Walter, have lost the family values that she and her husband tried to give them. She doesn’t want the insurance money to tear the family apart, and Ruth’s desire for an abortion represents, to her, the destruction of the family. After Walter loses the money, Beneatha tells her mother that he is no longer her brother. Lena tells her that she was taught to love her brother and that she should mourn for him. This speech makes the play end on a complicated note. Walter, in telling Karl Lindner that he and his family will move into their new house, had been allowed to be the patriarch. However, the fact remains that he has lost Beneatha’s tuition money, a move that demonstrates his naïveté and self-centeredness. We are not sure whether Walter has truly understood the gender relations within his family. In addition, the family’s breaking of the color line and moving to Clybourne Park poses a whole new set of challenges. However, Hansberry portrays a family that has its internal problems, but still strives and works together. Courtney Marshall
Race in A Raisin in the Sun
A Raisin in the Sun lies at the intersection of the integrationist Civil Rights movement of the 1950s and the emergent hostility of the Black Power movement of the 1960s. As such, it presents a complicated view of American race relations and a relatively new exploration of black culture. In the play, the Younger family decides to move from its run-down Chicago tenement into a home in an allwhite neighborhood, Clybourne Park. The governing body of the Youngers’ new neighborhood, the Clybourne Park Improvement Association, sends Karl Lindner to persuade them not to move into the neighborhood. Lindner says that the whites are not racist, but that everyone gets along better when they are segregated. He questions the family’s insistence
on moving into a place where they are not wanted. Though he tries to bribe the family in order to keep them out, Walter tells him that they will move because his father would want them to. The speech’s central claim is that black Americans should have right to enjoy the American dream just like white Americans. Mr. Lindner and the people he represents can see only the color of the Younger family’s skin, and Walter wants him to see them as just another family. He holds his son Travis and tells Lindner that he makes the sixth generation of the Younger family in America. Walter asserts their right to the American dream by portraying them as contributors, not strangers in the country. In addition, the play explores issues of blackness, namely the relationships between black Americans and black Africans. The only picture of Africa that Lena gets is the one she receives from Christian missionaries. Her daughter, Beneatha, has a deeper appreciation for the continent. Beneatha is torn between two men, George Murchison, the son of a wealthy businessman, and Joseph Asagai, a Nigerian student. Her relationship with these two men symbolizes her struggle to understand her identity as an African-American woman. Beneatha explores her black identity through her hair. At the beginning of the play, Beneatha has chemically straightened hair. After Joseph Asagai visits her home and questions her choice, she decides to cut her hair in order to be more “black.” To her, wearing an Afro means that she is in touch with her blackness and connection to Africa. When Walter and Fred see her Afro, they immediately tease her political views. The play is not completely sympathetic to Beneatha’s transformation. At the beginning of act 2, when she wears the Nigerian clothes Asagai brought her, she models them in a way that Hansberry describes as being “more like Butterfly than any Nigerian.” Beneatha mimics Oriental mannerisms and thinks they are African. This demonstrates her ignorance of Nigerian culture. To her, Africa is an idea, and though she is more interested in African culture, she is as ignorant as her mother on certain issues. However, her final decision to practice medicine in Africa promises a more informed view of the continent. Courtney Marshall
Jude the Obscureâ•…â•… 511
Hardy, Thomasâ•… Jude the Obscureâ•… (1895)
The love and life story of Jude Fawley is Hardy’s last novelistic achievement. Rural orphan boy Jude dreams of an academic career encouraged by his teacher and role model Phillotson. After a rash and failed marriage to Arabella, Jude pursues his career plans in Christminster (modeled on Oxford) where he meets and falls for his free-minded cousin Sue Bridehead. Instead of being accepted into college Jude becomes a stonemason, while Sue attends a training school to become a teacher and then (forced by social pressure) marries Phillotson. Jude tries to take up a clerical pathway. These plans become obsolete when Sue leaves Phillotson to live with Jude. They have several children, while a boy from Jude’s first marriage to Arabella goes to live with them. Their libertine life is overshadowed by material hardships and anguish caused by public rejection. Social ostracism leads to homelessness, nomadic life, unemployment, poverty, and finally to catastrophe: Jude and Arabella’s boy kills the other children and himself: “Done because we are to menny.” Sue is thrown into existential crisis and has a miscarriage; convalescing, she returns to Phillotson, convinced of her own and Jude’s guiltiness: She believes now that they have caused the disaster by living together in sin. Jude, existentially defeated and becoming seriously ill, is lured into remarrying Arabella. He pays a final visit to Sue, then on the voyage home completely loses his health. While Arabella is out with another man, he dies alone. Thomas Schares
Ambition in Jude the Obscure
Not all is love in Hardy’s love story of Jude Fawley and Sue Bridehead. As a young boy, Jude decides to follow the example of his schoolmaster Phillotson and go to the city and to the university to become a scholar. This will be his lifelong obsession and ambition. As with many of his time’s rural working class, Jude is attracted to the city. The city stands for the chance of social ascent. He pursues his destiny monomaniacally by teaching himself classical works in his childhood and youth, until his hasty marriage to Arabella ends his efforts prematurely. After the failure of this (forced) marriage, however, Jude leaves
for Christminster (Oxford) and becomes a part of the rural migration to urban areas. He picks up the profession of stonemasonry in order to earn his living before admission to the university. Again, his plans are postponed, because he meets and falls in love with his cousin Sue. The assumed path to wisdom for Jude turns out to be stony; the answer to his letter of inquiry from one of the heads of a university college is a signpost of class barriers and social rank haughtiness in Victorian England: “. . . judging from your description of yourself as a working man, I venture to think that you will have a much better chance of success in life by remaining in your own sphere and sticking to your trade. . . .” The blow of this rejection letter does not cause Jude to refrain from his ambitions. That Jude’s ambitions are more than infatuation becomes unmistakably clear when, the same evening, he embarrasses students in a pub by quoting the latin Credo flawlessly from memory. This phase of his life being molded by the struggle for Sue, he reshapes his original plans for an academic career: He starts to consider applying for a position with the church (the only traditional alternative for the poor in which to pursue university studies). These plans also become obsolete when his life with Sue begins. They live together “in sin,” which, of course, is not suitable for a post in the church. Like Jude, the whole ensemble of Jude the Obscure reveals ambition as an elementary human impetus, aiming at varying objectives: Jude’s first wife, Arabella, mainly represents the struggle for wealth and the urge to marry (materially) well; hers is the life-policy of immediate personal advantage. She leaves Jude the moment she finds out that he is not so promising after all in these terms. Sue, on the other hand, lives more for ideas than for aspirations. She is prone to compromise (marriage to Phillotson, religious turn in the end), since her ideals and ideas of new womanhood find little grounding in life as it is in Victorian England and to some extent cause her to act inconsistently. She is able and ambitious to become a teacher, but her lack of conformity renders this impossible. Jude’s teacher and the later husband of Sue, Phillotson, is the model of young Jude’s ambitions: The nobility of his character becomes apparent when he risks his career to consent to Sue’s
512â•…â•… Hardy, Thomas leaving him; this noble trait is revoked, however, when he takes back devastated Sue in the end. This, as a side-effect, amplifies his career again. Like all the other characters of the novel, he is a contradictory person. Jude, in the end, will never see the interior of a college. For him, ambition has resulted in restless wandering. Consequently, Jude and Sue have the happiest time of their lives when they have given up their ambitions and live together as an unmarried couple with their children. Sue says “We gave up all ambition, and were never so happy in our lives. . . .” This kind of happiness is terminal; this time the reason is not social immobility as determined by class structure but Sue and Jude’s offense against the rigidity of Victorian morality. A fascinating aspect of these two social factors is that class structure and moral code are not solely affecting the protagonists from without, but they are rather a part of the collective subconscious within the individual. Sue’s regression into devoutness, after the catastrophe has befallen her and Jude’s shared life, demonstrates this. The pessimism of the novel pivots around the two issues apparent here. The longing for love is constrained by a repressive contemporary moral code, and the longing for cultural education (which equals social ascent) is blocked by impenetrable social barriers. Thus, the repressive Victorian society prevents individuals from achieving happiness. Thomas Schares
Love in Jude the Obscure
Jude the Obscure is the tragic love story of Jude Fawley and his cousin Sue Bridehead. The whole plot of the novel is focused on and determined by their love, which is outlined as an elective affinity: Irrefutably, both are drawn to each other. Jude pursues Sue in Christminster, he even changes his plans and residence when she moves. Sue flees from the training school to Jude, and they always meet again in spite of all vows not to. The notion that the two are meant for each other is maintained throughout the novel, and even by antagonist characters: “They seem to be one person split in two!” This recurrent image of “two in one” alludes to the story of the separation of the two sexes by Aristophanes as given in Plato’s
Symposium: As a punishment, the gods cut the original whole human creature in half. They then went about separated and in unquenchable longing for their lost other half—a primeval desire for fusion through love. But the love of Sue and Jude in the whole course of events is not much more than a promise—a promise, maybe an ideal, never to be fulfilled, a tragic love that will end in catastrophe. They share only a brief period of living together happily. But during most of the novel’s events, they have to bear being apart, and Jude also has to cope with the experience of being abandoned repeatedly. Although there seems to be nothing more desirable to both of them than being together, there are always events preventing this—up to the tragic ending. Why this has to be, the novel refuses a definite answer, but there is far more to it than foreshadowings of dark hereditary family pathology. The novel reaches deeply into the psychology of its protagonists and offers various explanations and hints. But one social fact in the novel is a prominent obstacle and a concept most contradictory to Sue and Jude’s love: marriage. Discussed widely and repeatedly within the text and by the protagonists, Sue and Jude both believe it is the institution of marriage that destroys them. In fact, each marries another person: In his younger years, Jude is lured into marriage by the voluptuous Arabella, but she is disappointed and leaves him soon. Jude comes to consider this marriage “a permanent contract on a temporary feeling.” Sue, while ambitious to become a teacher, marries her patron and Jude’s former teacher Phillotson, because she feels like “a woman tossed about, all alone, with aberrant passions, . . .” although she certainly loves Jude. The strange magnetism between Jude and Sue soon brings this marriage to an end, too. Phillotson consents to divorce and Sue and Jude start living together. But their brief period of physical union, the joys of two children and a third on the way are marred by their different attitudes toward sexuality, as well as the reappearance of Arabella and miserable material circumstances. After their respective divorces, Jude and Sue attempt a couple of times to marry “to make their natural marriage a legal one” but always resolve “to go home without killing their dream.”
Jude the Obscureâ•…â•… 513 The catastrophic death of their children marks the end of their union. It throws Sue’s mental balance, causing her—once a New Woman with a free and bright intellect—to turn religious, thereby finally adopting the rules of late Victorian society she used to oppose so vehemently. She believes now that Jude and she living together in sin has caused the misery to the family and, repenting, returns to the detested Phillotson, having convinced herself that she is attached to him indissolubly by religious law. Arabella, by now widowed, also manages to trick Jude back to her. He subsequently falls ill with desperation and dies. Sue conforms and Jude gives in. It may be the bitterest irony of the novel that both protagonists conclude their lives by remarrying their unloved partners. There has been no hope for the love of Sue and Jude, the disappointments and delusions the situation has caused are too numerous. Jude sums up: “Perhaps the world is not illuminated enough for such experiments as ours.” Thomas Schares
Sex/Sensuality/Eroticism in Jude the Obscure
When the novel appeared in 1895 it caused a scandal among its cleric critics, one of whom renamed it Jude the Obscene. These agitations are hardly comprehensible nowadays, as the reader will not find any openly described sexuality in the book. Contemporary critical rejection of the novel is understandable because marriage as well as religion are attacked heavily. The only (sexually) gross event depicted involves a butchered pig’s “pizzle” (penis), which Arabella, Jude’s first wife-to-be, throws playfully at Jude on the occasion of their first acquaintance. While sexual performance is banished behind the scenery (we know it is happening frequently because of the children emerging), the characters do not refrain from discussing their sexuality; this also was probably unsettling for the Victorian reader. Mainly through her conversations with Jude it becomes apparent that Sue, Jude’s great love, is not a sensual creature: Rejection of sexual intercourse (with men) is a stable disposition of her character. She tells Jude of a former relationship, a “friendly intimacy with an undergraduate at Christminster” . . . “he wanted me as a mistress, in fact, but I wasn’t
in love with him.” Sue admits: “I have mixed with [men]—one or two of them particularly—almost as one of their own sex.” Her attitude toward men is unconventional, as is her sexual nature. She has a hysterical breakdown when she assumes that her then-husband Phillotson is trying to persuade her into her matrimonial duties. In fact, as Sue believes toward the end, from the moment she gave in to Jude, their lives began to worsen and, in this later interpretation of events, to lead to catastrophe. But the constant rejective posture of Sue is a symptom of her whole disposition: She feels “that before a thing was done it might be right to do, but that being done it became wrong; or, in other words, that things which are right in theory became wrong in practice.” Consequently, Sue prefers the mere possibility of a (sexual) relationship with Jude to its fulfillment. Her attitude toward sexuality reveals a very complex and much-debated character, which cannot be unfolded extensively here (gender perspective is be left out of this brief account). Many times, a kiss is the most intense token of love Jude can obtain from Sue, and it takes them a while of living together before their sexual relationship commences—in a moment of crisis when Sue feels threatened by Arabella’s return. The fairy-like, asexual constitution of Sue marks a sharp contrast to Jude’s less refined inclinations to “savage” sexuality (as with Arabella) and drinking. Jude’s (occasionally fulfilled) desire to fully love Sue is an urge to possess the unpossessable (she being his cousin). The contrast is evident when Jude compares her to Arabella: In observing Sue’s bosom, “the small, tight, apple-like convexities of her bodice, so different from Arabella’s amplitudes.” To Jude Sue is “the most ethereal, least sensual woman I ever knew to exist without inhuman sexlessness.” Jude’s attachment to his first wife, Arabella, is of a completely different nature. They attract each other mutually, but this attraction is purely sexual. In all other aspects of matrimonial life and in terms of affection for each other, they fail; after a short while, Arabella flees from Jude to immigrate to Australia. To Jude, this marriage was “buying a month’s pleasure with a life’s discomfort.” After her second husband has died, Arabella turns to Jude again, taking advantage of his miserable state. Two times Arabella
514â•…â•… Hardy, Thomas lures Jude into marriage by employing sexual desire and alcohol as bait. The overall impact of sexuality and eroticism is ambivalent in Jude the Obscure, the gender question being obscured by observations on society. There is no purely satisfying and blissful sexuality (neither sexual identity) to be found throughout the novel; in the end it always has sad consequences. It forces Jude into his first marriage, it keeps him from the city and his ambitions awhile, it kills his ambitions again when he has to feed the hungry mouths of his and Sue’s family, he even betrays Sue with Arabella on one occasion. Concerning Jude, sexuality is one of the factors that have formed the tragedy of his life. “For each ecstatic instant / We must an anguish pay” as Emily Dickinson puts it. Yet Jude refrains from a clerical path to be no longer “the soldier and servant of a religion in which sexual love was regarded as at its best a frailty, and at its worst damnation.” The negative powers are not inherent in sexuality itself but in what society makes of it. And maybe here lies one purely fatalistic strain of Hardy’s thinking, as, at this point, his pessimism is projected onto society. For example, characters who behave progressively are punished by society; as Jude says, “I perceive there is something wrong somewhere in our social formulas,” and Phillotson loses his teaching position as a consequence of letting his wife, Sue, go to live with Jude (“She is not [my wife]; she is another man’s except in name and law.” To sum up: A repressive society prevents both pure love and a satisfying sexuality by the instruments of religion and, indeed, marriage. Thomas Schares
Hardy, Thomasâ•… Tess of the d’Urbervillesâ•… (1891)
Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the d’Urbervilles, set in rural southwestern England, was published serially in a periodical before appearing in book form in 1891. Hardy faced a great deal of criticism from his audience and from publishers who disapproved of the “infidelity” and the “obscenity” of this novel that narrates Tess’s hardships following her unwilling loss of innocence. Hardy resented the changes editors expected him to make; after a similarly nega-
tive reaction to his next novel, Jude the Obscure, he announced that he would never write fiction again. However, the last novel sold well and was a financial success, though many readers found it depressing and shocking. Tess of the d’Urbervilles takes place during a time of dramatic social and economic change in England, and, like many of Hardy’s novels, illustrates a great awareness of the trials and hardships faced by the rural poor, especially the women. Here, Hardy preÂ�sents a compassionate depiction of a young woman victimized by a morally rigid and often hypocritical society. Moreover, Hardy examines the nature and implications of the slow transition from an old-fashioned, community-centered agricultural society to a modern, industrial economy driven by money and in which individuals often must fend for themselves. Erica Artiles
Community in Tess of the d’Urbervilles
The first image readers get of Tess Durbeyfield is that of a young woman dressed, like her peers, in white, participating in a May Day dance. Despite her simple, natural beauty, Tess does not stand out, but rather fits well into this safe, comfortable community that she has known for her entire life. Following a series of events that jeopardize her family’s livelihood, Tess leaves her native Blackmoor and its familiar community. While away, she encounters a new, rougher community and is sexually violated by her employer, Alec d’Urberville. As a result of her loss of virginity, Tess finds herself cut off from her native society and begins a futile search for a new community and a sense of belonging. As a girl, Tess was popular. She had two particularly close friends with whom she spent a great deal of time. Moreover, she played a very important role in the community of her family, caring for and loving her younger siblings when her mother failed to do so. Despite her safe and comfortable position, Tess leaves her home behind in order to cultivate relations with the d’Urberville family in Tantridge, hoping to help out her family that has suffered the loss of their horse, their primary means for income. In Tantridge, Tess meets a rough, harddrinking community of men and women. Though
Tess of the d’Urbervillesâ•…â•… 515 they are willing to accept Tess, she feels threatened and remains distant from them. Consequently, she leaves their company while on the way home from a dance late one night and finds herself alone with Alec d’Urberville, who seduces her against her will and leaves her pregnant. Tess briefly returns home following the loss of her innocence, but no longer fits neatly into the community from which she came. Despite the fact that her friends come to see her, Tess can no longer take part in their chatter, laughter, and good-humored teasing of her. She feels lonely, guilt-ridden, and unable to relate either to her peers or to her family. Although she leaves her house periodically to work in the village, Tess spends most of her time hiding in her family’s house and avoiding all company. Eventually, Tess leaves her native Blackmoor again, this time to seek employment at Talbothay’s Dairy. There, no one knows anything of her past. Farmer Crick and his wife, the milkmaids, and the apprentice Angel Clare eagerly welcome her into their warm and happy community. Tess revives during her time there, thrives in the natural environment, and strikes up a romance with Angel Clare. Tess initially resists engaging in a relationship with Clare because of her past actions, but eventually she succumbs to love and accepts his offer of marriage. Following their wedding ceremony, the couple leaves the dairy community behind. Though Tess tries repeatedly to tell Angel of her past, she does not succeed until their wedding night when they both reveal indiscretions. Furious with Tess, Angel rejects her, leaving the girl entirely alone and ashamed to return to Talbothay’s dairy. She briefly returns home once more, but finds her bedroom occupied by siblings and her father questioning the validity of her marriage. Feeling more isolated and alone than ever, Tess again leaves. Needing work, Tess accepts a series of temporary jobs that demand more and more from her physically. She suffers extreme poverty and has no real connections to anyone. While at FlintcombAsh, she reconnects with Marion, whom she knew at the dairy. Here, brutally hard field work and dire conditions prevent the development of any real community and Tess struggles alone, testing the limits of her physical ability. During a chance
encounter, Tess meets Alec d’Urberville who has reformed his ways and become a traveling preacher. Tess rejects his advances initially, but familial hardship again leads her to accept his assistance. In exchange for helping her family, she agrees to live as his mistress. They take up residence in a fine house in a resort town on the English Channel. Despite her elegant lodging and her fine dress, Tess continues to feel isolated and disconnected from any larger community. When Angel returns, she abandons this life with Alec, whom she murders, and retreats to an abandoned mansion with her husband, forming a small but relatively happy community of just the two of them. Their happiness is short-lived, however. Pursued by the law, Tess leaves the mansion and heads for Stonehenge completely alone to await her fate. Erica Artiles
Guilt in Tess of the d’Urbervilles
In Tess of the d’Urbervilles, Thomas Hardy explores both the origins and consequences of guilt through the story of the title character’s fall from grace. Throughout the novel, Tess finds herself in difficult and complex situations that lead to her victimization and her inability to act in her own best interest. Only by overcoming the overwhelming sense of guilt that plagues her can Tess finally take responsibility for her own fate. Tess’s guilt arises from two primary sources: her overwhelming sense of responsibility to her family and her acceptance of the traditional Christian equation of virtue and purity with chastity. As the daughter of an alcoholic father and an incompetent mother, Tess takes responsibility for her younger siblings and helping to run the household. When she spends an afternoon dancing and reveling with other girls her age, Tess feels guilty for getting grass stains on the white dress that her mother washed and ironed. Later, when her father drinks too much and cannot take the family’s beehives to the market, Tess offers to drive them despite the fact that she is exhausted and inexperienced. During the journey, Tess dozes off briefly, leading to the death of the family’s horse. Guilt and responsibility lead Tess to submit, against her better judgment, to her mother’s plan for her to make connections with the very
516â•…â•… Hardy, Thomas wealthy d’Urberville family to whom, her mother and father believe, they are distantly related. In an effort to aid her family, Tess accepts employment caring for Mrs. d’Urberville’s pet fowl and encounters Alec d’Urberville, who is attracted to Tess and repeatedly tries to seduce her. Though dependent upon Alec for her livelihood and socially inferior to him, Tess stands her ground and repeatedly rejects his advances. One night, though, Tess impulsively accepts his offer for a ride home from a village dance in order to avoid a confrontation with some members of the Tantridge community. During the dark and foggy night, Alec loses his way, leaving him and Tess alone in the woods together. Alec again entreats her as a lover and informs her of the many gifts he has given her family, including a new horse for her father. In response to his request, perhaps motivated by a sense of guilt, Tess is indecisive when answering his request. Though she never explicitly agrees, Tess helplessly succumbs to his advances. Shortly after losing her virginity, Tess returns to her family pregnant and riddled with guilt and shame. On the way home, she encounters a man painting religious messages about damnation and sin throughout the countryside. When she asks him about sin that one does not commit willingly, he ignores her question and instead talks about the ability of such messages to incite guilt. Though Tess says that she does not believe the validity of such messages, she leaves the company of the painter profoundly affected. Tess returns home only long enough to bear and bury her sickly child. Following her sexual experience, Tess senses a chasm that divides her from her former self as well as from her former companions. This social chasm reflects society’s linking of chastity with virtue, and Tess accepts the fact that her sin has made her an immoral woman and an outcast. She becomes overwhelmed with guilt at defying both social conventions and religious prohibitions. Consequently, she resists Angel Clare’s love at Talbothay’s dairy, despite her powerful feelings. Later, her guilt prompts her to accept Angel’s unreasonably harsh rejection of her as a lover and a wife, despite his own past indiscretions. Later, following the unexpected death of her father, Tess returns home and again, out of a sense of guilt and
responsibility, defies her own judgment to help her family. Having recently encountered Alec again, Tess refuses his continuing advances until he offers assistance to her homeless and desperate family. She agrees to live as his mistress, taking on even greater guilt, in order to have her mother and siblings provided for. Once Angel returns, however, Tess regrets conceding to Alec, kills her lover, and follows her husband to an abandoned mansion where, apart from society, they consummate their marriage and live as husband and wife until they are discovered. Though her action here is complex, one could argue that she has rejected her sense of responsibility to her family and her guilt over her past actions. About to be captured, Tess heads for Stonehenge by herself and sleeps on an altar, where victims were sacrificed to the gods, before being taken by the authorities. Erica Artiles
Social Class in Tess of the d’Urbervilles
Thomas Hardy, in Tess of the d’Urbervilles, presents a cast of male characters that represent various social classes of late-19th-century England. Tess’s involvement with each of the men illustrates some of the problems and inconsistencies inherent in each class. The story opens with Tess’s father, John Durbeyfield, learning that he is the sole remaining member of the ancient d’Urberville line. He is lazy and poor, scraping together a living by doing odd jobs and peddling various wares. Once he learns of his lineage, Durbeyfield becomes proud and arrogant, taking on some of the worst traits of the aristocracy without the money or social standing that define the class. The meager living he does make becomes jeopardized when he is too intoxicated to take his beehives to the market in Casterbridge. Tess offers to go instead and inadvertently kills their horse, the primary means of the family’s livelihood. Hoping to establish a connection with and to profit from what he assumes to be another, wealthier branch of the d’Urberville family, John sends Tess to Tantridge where she encounters Alec d’Urberville. He is the son of a successful merchant, Simon Stokes, who changed his name to d’Urberville after he found records of what he believed to be an extinct family line in the British Museum. Following his
“The Luck of Roaring Camp”â•…â•… 517 father’s death, Alec takes control of the fortune and makes the most of the new money and the new family name. Although Alec does assist the Durbeyfield family and offers Tess a job tending his invalid mother’s fowl, his primary motives for hiring her are personal. He is attracted to Tess and relentlessly pursues her. Tess, however, has no feelings for Alec, firmly resisting his many advances until he takes advantage of her one night when they are traveling alone together on an abandoned road. After learning she is pregnant, Tess returns home and gives birth to a son, Sorrow, who represents the merging of an old name with new money. The child lives for only a short time. After burying the child, Tess accepts employment as a dairy maid and encounters many honorable, hard-working country folk, including Farmer Crick. He is a master of his trade, treats his employees well, and works hard for his living. While there, Tess meets and falls in love with Angel Clare, a member of the ambitious middle class. He is the son of a minister, yet he has rejected the clergy, choosing instead to seek his fortune in agriculture. Angel has grand ambitions, which include buying a large plot of land and establishing a farm, but no genuine aptitude for farming or clear sense of direction. On their wedding night, he and Tess both confess their past indiscretions. Though Tess immediately forgives him for an affair he once had in London, he cannot accept her past. After giving her some money, he leaves Tess behind and boards a boat to Brazil. Following her rejection by her husband, Tess sets out in search of a place in this stratified society. As one born into a poor country family, seduced by a member of the newly rich, and married to an ambitious middle-class gentleman, Tess does not fit anywhere. She tries returning to the fields, but nearly collapses under the cruel conditions and the strain of the labor. When she learns that her mother is ill, Tess returns home. Within a few weeks, her mother recovers and her father passes away, causing the family to be evicted from their cottage. In an effort to keep her mother and siblings fed and sheltered, Tess reluctantly agrees to live with a still smitten Alec, whom she meets during a chance encounter. Alec provides for the family, and for a brief time Tess lives the life of a wealthy lady, dressing in fancy
clothes and residing in a luxurious boardinghouse. Seeing the error of his ways, Angel returns from Brazil to reclaim his wife and finds Tess in her new life. He tells her that he has forgiven her and begs her to return to him, but Tess refuses, saying that he has come too late. Angel leaves heartbroken and Tess regrets her decision to stay with her lover. After stabbing Alec to death, she flees with Angel to an abandoned country mansion where they live in relative luxury for a week until they are discovered. Tess is captured at Stonehenge and put to death, bringing an end to her search for a place and social identity. Erica Artiles
Harte, Bretâ•… “The Luck of Roaring Camp”â•… (1868)
Bret Harte’s 1868 short story “The Luck of Roaring Camp” depicts a fictional western community in the Sierra foothills of California, known as Roaring Camp. The small, male-dominated community of rowdy and at times uncivilized characters are faced with the challenges of accepting and raising a newborn child while at the same time upholding their belief in not welcoming newcomers into their community. When Cherokee Sal, the only female at Roaring Camp, dies during childbirth, the inhabitants of Roaring Camp find themselves taking care of a newborn baby, whom they later name Tommy Luck or “The Luck.” Stumpy, who helps deliver the child, is elected to take the lead in raising the child with the only other female entity in the camp, a mule named Jinny. As the camp comes together to help raise the child, the men find themselves indulging in their “softer” sides, often exchanging their rowdy behavior for a quieter, more civilized way of life. The men at Roaring Camp, including Kentuck, a rough individual without much attention to his outward appearance who takes a particular liking to Tommy Luck, nurture the child in their own way by bringing flowers and gifts from nature to the young child. The birth of Tommy Luck introduces a range of unfamiliar concepts to the residents of Roaring Camp—the innocence of a newborn child and the realization of their own flaws.
518â•…â•… Harte, Bret Several months after the birth of the child a great flood washes Roaring Camp away, sending buildings and the camp’s inhabitants into the river. Stumpy is the first known victim of the flood as his body is found washed on the shore. “The Luck” is found, barely alive, as is Kentuck. The story concludes with Kentuck and “The Luck” being washed into the river to meet their deaths. Andrew Andermatt
Community in “The Luck of Roaring Camp”
Bret Harte’s short story, “The Luck of Roaring Camp” (1868), depicts a fictional western community in the foothills of the Sierra Mountains of California. Roaring Camp is a small, maledominated community that seems, on the surface, to reject civilized behavior in favor of a rugged, violent society. The community that makes up this fictional setting is best analyzed through a reading of the camp’s gender, sense of identity, and the way these elements, in conjunction with the characters’ actions, lead to the overall changing of the community in which they find themselves. Early in the story Harte gives his readers a glimpse at the community life that exists within the boundaries of Roaring Camp. First, we see the residents of Roaring Camp congregated at a cabin in the clearing where “Cherokee Sal,” the only female in Roaring Camp, is ready to deliver a baby. With this detail, the reader assumes the “novelty” of the event that is ready to commence. While residents of the camp are regularly exposed to violence and death, a birth is fairly unknown. Here, Harte begins to paint this community as a stereotypical, anti-female, male entity. Roaring Camp itself is referred to as a malegendered individual, rather than a group of people. After the residents elect one of their own residents, Stumpy, to help deliver the baby, the narrator states that “Roaring Camp sat down outside, smoked its pipe, and awaited the issue.” What continues to develop this community’s stereotypical “maleness” is the camp’s strict opposition to female inclusion, as illustrated by Harte’s decision to “kill off ” Cherokee Sal shortly after the delivery of her baby. Once “Tom Luck” or “The Luck” is born and in the care of the male camp, the narrator states that “The introduction of a female
nurse in the camp also met with objection,” and that the camp “didn’t want any more of the other kind,” a clear reference to the community’s view of male superiority and female subordination. To be fair to the residents of Roaring Camp, it is important to consider that the narrator makes a point of telling readers that the camp, in general, “looks suspiciously on all strangers,” which suggests that while the members of the camp may not welcome women, they equally shut out anyone who is not part of their community. “They’re mighty rough on strangers,” the narrator asserts while reminding readers that encouragement to immigration of any kind was not given. Another characteristic of the inhabitants’ identity that leads to their overall sense of community is the descriptions of the men themselves. The narrator tells us that some of the men gathered around are fugitives from justice, criminals, and reckless individuals. Even though the term “roughs” is applied to them, the narrator makes a point to let us know that the term is one of “distinction” rather than definition, as the men hardly look the part of their reputation, with their soft voices, diminutive stature, and “Hamlet-like” appearance. The barbaric picture painted of these characters is more or less the way these characters want their community to be viewed rather than what really is the case. Harte continues to explore this true identity of the community within Roaring Camp by showing how the arrival of “The Luck” brings out the sensitivity of the men. The mere gathering around Cherokee Sal invokes a “maternal” instinct within the men, who are anxious to see the orphan and bring gifts to the baby. Moreover, the men are enthusiastic about keeping the baby and raising it themselves and, with the baby’s safety at heart, are concerned about what may happen if he were to be taken from the camp. The true sense of the nurturing community of the men at Roaring Camp is seen when everyone comes together for the child’s christening and naming; and, while Stumpy takes charge of the baby’s care, Roaring Camp as a community serves as both the baby’s mother and father. The arrival of “The Luck” clearly shifts the identity of this community from the stereotypical, rugged male-dominated society to one that clearly
“The Luck of Roaring Camp”â•…â•… 519 is capable of civilized behavior. The camp undergoes a complete transformation, illustrated through the characterization of Kentuck, one of the residents of the camp whose clothing changes only when “sloughed off through decay.” During the transformation, or “subtle influence of innovation,” as the narrator puts it, Kentuck appears regularly in a clean shirt and washed face. The camp’s once boisterous and violent ways have subsided so as not to disturb the baby, and cursing becomes a thing of the past. Andrew Andermatt
Gender in “The Luck of Roaring Camp”
Bret Harte’s short story, “The Luck of Roaring Camp,” depicts a fictional western community in the foothills of the Sierra Mountains of California. Roaring Camp is a small, male-dominated community that seems, on the surface, to reject civilized behavior in favor of a rugged, violent society. The community that makes up this fictional setting is best analyzed through a reading of the camp’s gender, sense of identity, and the way these elements, in conjunction with the characters’ actions, lead to the overall changing community in which they find themselves. Early in the story Harte gives his readers a glimpse at the community life that exists within the boundaries of Roaring Camp. First, we see the residents of Roaring Camp congregated at a cabin in the clearing where “Cherokee Sal,” the only female in Roaring Camp, is ready to deliver a baby. With this detail, the reader assumes the “novelty” of this event. While residents of the camp are regularly exposed to violence and death, a birth is fairly unknown. Here, Harte begins to paint this community as a stereotypical, anti-female, male entity. Roaring Camp itself is referred to as a malegendered individual, rather than a group of people. After the residents elect one of their own, Stumpy, to help deliver the baby, the narrator states that “Roaring Camp sat down outside, smoked its pipe, and awaited the issue.” What continues to develop this community’s stereotypical “Maleness” is the camp’s strict opposition to female inclusion, as illustrated by Harte’s decision to “kill off ” Cherokee Sal shortly after the delivery of her baby. Once “Tom Luck” or “The
Luck” is born and in the care of the male camp, the narrator states that “The introduction of a female nurse in the camp also met with objection,” and that the camp “didn’t want any more of the other kind,” a clear reference to the community’s view of male superiority and female subordination. To be fair to the residents of Roaring Camp, it is important to consider that the narrator makes a point of telling readers that the camp, in general, is suspicious of all outsiders, which suggests that while the members of the camp may not welcome women, they equally shut out anyone who is not part of their community. The narrator asserts that they are rough on strangers while reminding readers that encouragement was not given to immigration of any kind. Another characteristic of the inhabitants’ identity that leads to their overall sense of community is the descriptions of the men themselves. The narrator tells us that some of the men gathered around are fugitives from justice, criminals, and reckless individuals. Even though the term “roughs” is applied to them, the narrator makes a point of letting us know that the term is one of “distinction” rather than definition, as the men hardly look the part of their reputation, with their soft voices, diminutive stature, and “Hamlet-like” appearance. The barbaric picture painted of these characters is more or less the way these characters want their community to be viewed rather than what really is the case. Harte continues to explore this true identity of the community within Roaring Camp by showing how the arrival of “The Luck” brings out the sensitivity of the men. The mere gathering around Cherokee Sal invokes a “maternal” instinct within the men, who are anxious to see the orphan and bring gifts to the baby. Moreover, the men are enthusiastic about keeping the baby and raising it themselves and, with the baby’s safety at heart, are concerned about what may happen if he were to be taken from the camp. The true sense of the nurturing community of the men at Roaring Camp is seen when everyone comes together for the child’s christening and naming, and the fact that, while Stumpy takes charge of the baby’s care, Roaring Camp as a community serves as both the baby’s mother and father. The arrival of “The Luck” clearly shifts the identity of this community from the stereotypical,
520â•…â•… Harte, Bret rugged male-dominated society to one that clearly is capable of civilized behavior. The camp undergoes a complete transformation, illustrated through the characterization of Kentuck, one of the residents of the camp whose clothing changes only when “sloughed off through decay.” During the transformation, or “subtle influence of innovation,” as the narrator puts it, Kentuck appears regularly in a clean shirt and washed face. The camp’s once boisterous and violent ways subside so as to not disturb the baby, and cursing becomes a thing of the past. Andrew Andermatt
Isolation in “The Luck of Roaring Camp”
Isolation as a literary theme may appear in a variety of forms. In some cases, isolation may present itself through a story’s protagonist or antagonist—most commonly when the main character(s) experience loneliness because of a physical separation. Isolation may also occur much more figuratively—perhaps emotionally or psychologically as a symbol for a larger idea such as a generation gap between characters or inequality between the sexes. In Bret Harte’s “The Luck of Roaring Camp,” Harte presents the concept of isolation in three ways—as an entity that is in constant contrast with or perpetuated by the notion of “togetherness,” as a commentary on the separation of the sexes, and as a voluntary act to avoid shortcomings. The opening paragraph sets the story’s tone and introduces the reader to two competing themes, loneliness and togetherness. First, readers are presented with the notion that the camp is a lonely and desolate place. The narrator describes not only the ditches and claims, but also “Tuttle’s Grocery,” as being deserted. The vacancy of the grocery, which seems to regularly entertain gamblers, suggests that the camp is unusually and eerily abandoned. The camp must be quite desolate, as the narrator reflects that not even a shootout between French Pete and Kanaka Joe could stop the patrons from playing a game. While the camp seems abandoned in some areas, there is a sense of camaraderie and togetherness as we learn that all residents are collected at a cabin at the outer edge of the clearing. The theme of isolation is in constant competition with togetherness, most
obviously with the descriptions the narrator offers in the opening paragraph and later with Cherokee Sal, the only female character, and the male community that makes up Roaring Camp. Harte seems to want readers to understand that the community that constitutes the camp also engenders the camp’s primary isolation. The most obvious case of isolation in the story centers on the only female member of Roaring Camp, Cherokee Sal. When readers meet Cherokee Sal, she is ready to give birth, with the community of males surrounding her cabin waiting to hear news of what is taking place. The narrator tells us that Cherokee Sal feels loneliness particularly because she lacks the compassion of her own sex. She is the only one at the camp who can experience the pain of childbirth, and her rough and tough male counterparts are the only people who can comfort her. In this case, Cherokee Sal is obviously an outsider at Roaring Camp—as unable to relate to the male population as the males are to her giving birth and nurturing a child. While Harte may be commenting on the isolation of females in male-dominated 19th-century communities, he seems to view the males of Roaring Camp as equally isolated as females. The men are first and foremost isolated from their former lives. Readers do not get insight from the narrator as to what these previous lives were, but the narrator makes it clear that the men have left behind some part of their identities. The narrator states that only two of the roughly 100 men are fugitives, but all are reckless. With the exception of Stumpy and Kentuck, whom readers get to know only through their interaction with Tommy Luck, the residents of Roaring Camp all seem to take on one identity. There really is no individualization at the camp. The camp itself is also isolated, secluded from the world and even its own shortcomings. Roaring Camp is unwelcoming to strangers. The narrator explains that the camp is not only physically isolated by the mountains, but also that it does not encourage visitors who stumble upon it to stay. It seems that the camp has somehow willfully secluded itself, striving to make its isolation from the rest of the world “perfect.” Andrew Andermatt
“The Outcasts of Poker Flat”â•…â•… 521
Harte, Bretâ•… “The Outcasts of Poker Flat”â•… (1869)
“The Outcasts of Poker Flat,” one of Bret Harte’s most successful and anthologized western frontier tales, was first published in the January 1869 issue of Overland Monthly, a magazine Harte edited. The story of individuals exiled from a hypocritical society who form a community of love and compassion in the face of impending death, it shows the goodness that exists in all humanity. Four outcasts, shunned by the town of Poker Flat in a fit of moral cleansing, are being sent to Sandy Bar. They are led by the philosophical gambler, Mr. John Oakhurst, who appears in several other Harte stories, notably “The Luck of Roaring Camp” (1868). It is Oakhurst who prompts the town’s outrage by winning several thousand dollars of their money in a card game. The other three—“The Duchess,” a prostitute; “Mother Shipton,” presumably her madam; and “Uncle Billy,” a drunkard and thief—represent all the moral ills that Poker Flat deems worthy of exile. Before the four can reach Sandy Bar, however, they must take shelter at the foot of the Sierra Nevada of northern California. By fate or chance, they are met by Tom Simson, an “Innocent” from Sandy Bar, and his 15-year-old fiancée Piney Woods. They all struggle to accept their individual and collective fates. After Uncle Billy steals a horse and their mules, and a snowstorm leaves them no way out, we see illustrations of themes common to Harte’s work, such as community, fate, heroism, innocence and experience, nature, social class, and survival. Though the story ends in tragedy (of the six, only the Innocent survives), its true message is that appearances are deceiving. The “outcasts,” by their selfless love and sacrifice for one another, are shown to be morally superior to those who shunned them. Gary Kerley
Fate in “The Outcasts of Poker Flat”
Because the events of the story revolve around the actions of Mr. John Oakhurst, a professional gambler from Roaring Camp, fate, chance, and circumstance play a major role. At the beginning of the narrative, Oakhurst senses an ominous change in the air of Poker Flat. On the morning of November
23, 1850, he is aware that the citizens of the town are experiencing a virtuous reaction to his winning several thousand dollars. He accepts the sentence because, as a gambler, he knows not to tempt Fate. His gambler’s experience tells him that the odds are always in favor of the house, in this case the town of Poker Flat. Though some in the town want to hang Oakhurst, he is escorted out of town at gunpoint, accompanied by three other undesirables: “The Duchess,” a prostitute; “Mother Shipton,” presumably her madam; and “Uncle Billy,” a gold thief and drunkard. Because he accepts his fate, Oakhurst does not grumble or curse as do the others. In fact, he remains cheerful and philosophically calm; he even gives his best horse to the Duchess. Halfway between Poker Flat and Sandy Bar, the next town, the outcasts camp in a wooded area in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada. Oakhurst believes that they do not have time to stop; he senses something fateful in the air, much as he did the morning of their exile. The sky is ominously clouded and, in his gambler’s vernacular, they are throwing up their hands before the game is played out. Fate again enters the story when the outcasts are joined by Tom Simson, the “Innocent” of Sandy Bar, and his 15-year-old fiancée, Piney Woods. Tom is on his way to Poker Flat to marry Piney and seek his fortune. Tom and Oakhurst had met a few months before when Oakhurst won all of Tom’s fortune, $40, in a game of cards. Oakhurst, knowing Tom’s naiveté and inexperience, returned the money and told Tom never to gamble again. Whether the meeting is coincidental or fated, the addition of Tom and Piney further complicates matters. There are now two more mouths to feed, and Oakhurst cannot persuade Tom and Piney to travel on toward Poker Flat. As snow begins to fall, Oakhurst discovers that Uncle Billy has stolen a horse and the mules and deserted his fellow outcasts. Though none of the others are surprised, Oakhurst alone is truly aware of their predicament: They are too far away from either Poker Flat or Sandy Bar to make it on what provisions are left. They have food enough for only 10 days. As the others in the party amuse themselves with music and stories around a campfire, Oakhurst is more and more aware of their impending, dire circumstances. Always the gambler, Oakhurst likens
522â•…â•… Harte, Bret the situation to a streak of bad luck. Their luck has changed since they left Poker Flat, he announces to the others. Their fate is sealed, but only he seems aware of how bad things are likely to get. A week goes by, and the party becomes imprisoned by the snow in a small cabin; their provisions are running out. Oakhurst calls it a losing hand, though the others try to make the best of it. Ironically, Mother Shipton, the strongest of the party, is the first to die because she starved herself to give her food to the young Piney so she can live longer. Eventually, all of them realize that their situation is hopeless, but Oakhurst, in a last attempt to cheat fate, sends Tom back to Poker Flat on a pair of snowshoes fashioned out of an old horse saddle. It is a two-day journey on foot, but it is his only chance to save Piney. Though Oakhurst could save himself, he never once thinks of deserting the others. The next morning, both Piney and the Duchess accept their fate, and when they are found by the men from Poker Flat, they are covered in snow, locked in each other’s arms. It is Oakhurst’s fate to be the last of the outcasts to die. His body is found under the snow beneath a tree on which he has left his own epitaph, written on a deuce of clubs, the lowest card in the deck. Oakhurst lived as a gambler and dies the same way. At the end he writes that he has “struck a streak of bad luck” and “cashed in his checks.” His fate has finally caught up to him. The ominous sense he felt the morning of the exile has been realized. Gary Kerley
Innocence and Experience in “The Outcasts of Poker Flat”
Mr. John Oakhurst, an experienced gambler, the central character of the story and the impetus for the casting out of undesired elements in Poker Flat, is a natural foil for a young Tom Simson, the “Innocent” from Sandy Bar, another camp one day’s journey away. The two characters represent opposites in both life experience and understanding. Oakhurst is described at the beginning of the story as a professional gambler who is not at all surprised by the townspeople’s sudden moral indignation. He has been in situations like this before, and he takes
the sentence of exile with calmness and a bemused acceptance of Fate. Tom Simson’s inexperience and naiveté are evident when he is first introduced to the outcasts. He and Oakhurst had met a few months before when Oakhurst won Tom’s entire fortune of $40. Because of Oakhurst’s knowledge of human nature, he returns the youth’s money and urges him never to gamble again. Though Tom is excited to see his old friend, he again shows his inexperience by telling Oakhurst that he is going to Poker Flat to make his fortune and to elope with Piney Woods, a waitress. Piney, on meeting the others, hides behind a tree, blushes, and acts even younger than her 15 years. Oakhurst’s fellow outcasts have diverse experiences in the ways of the world. The narrative clearly implies that both the Duchess and Mother Shipton are ladies of questionable character, and Uncle Billy is a gold thief and a drunkard. When they are exiled from Poker Flat, they are not surprised, only indignant. When Tom assumes the Duchess is Mrs. Oakhurst simply because she is traveling with him, Uncle Billy has to be restrained from laughing out loud. Oakhurst also has to keep Uncle Billy in check when he starts to tell Tom and Piney that their situation is getting desperate. Even before a snowstorm traps the outcasts and their new acquaintances, it is Oakhurst who correctly sizes up the situation. When Uncle Billy leaves them stranded by taking off with a horse and mules, Oakhurst’s years of gambling experience help him remain calm. He chooses not to tell Tom and Piney the truth about the defection, telling them that Uncle Billy accidentally stampeded the animals. Oakhurst remains cheerful and merely says they have had a run of bad luck. He even likens their situation to a week-long camping trip. As the storm worsens and their provisions dwindle, Oakhurst continues to keep himself calm and to keep Tom and Piney in the dark, thereby leaving them content, even happy. The group builds a big fire, and Tom plays his accordion and regales the others by acting out stories from a copy of the Iliad. Both the Duchess and Mother Shipton are aware of their predicament. They are not surprised to learn that Uncle Billy stole the mules, but neither dares to upset Tom or especially the young Piney.
“The Outcasts of Poker Flat”â•…â•… 523 Mother Shipton, in an act of selflessness that belies the town’s moral judgment of her, starves herself in order to keep Piney alive. In the end, however, even Piney loses her innocence by accepting her dark fate and realizing there is no escape from death. When the townspeople of Poker Flat find her, she and the Duchess are both in the cabin, covered in snow, locked in each other’s arms. Oakhurst’s experience and philosophical calm finally play themselves out. He gives his companions a few days’ worth of fuel before he leaves the cabin in order to keep them alive a little longer. He could have saved himself earlier, but he sacrificed his own life, hoping that Tom could save Piney by returning to Poker Flat for help. Oakhurst read his own fate. At the end of the story, the townspeople find his cold dead body under a tree. On the tree is pinned a deuce of clubs, and written on it in his own hand is Oakhurst’s epitaph: “Beneath this tree lies the body of John Oakhurst, who struck a streak of bad luck on the 23rd of November, 1850 and handed in his checks on the 7th of December, 1850.” It is ironic that, in the end, both innocence and experience are brought together by the characters’ fateful exile from Poker Flat. The snow, pure but deadly, covers the morally questionable Duchess and the virginal Piney. Even the law of Poker Flat recognizes that sense of merged innocence and experience, and they turn away, not disturbing the bodies. Oakhurst, experienced in getting out of previous scrapes, cannot win this time, so he takes his own life in the face of certain death. Gary Kerley
Survival in “The Outcasts of Poker Flat”
Reading “The Outcasts of Poker Flat” when it was first published in 1869, contemporaries of Bret Harte were familiar with the struggle to survive in the rugged Sierra Nevada of northern California. They would have known of the tragedy of the Donner Party during the winter between November 1846 and February 1847. Of 87 migrants, 40 died and many of the survivors resorted to cannibalism. Survival challenges would continue to plague many immigrants on their westward rush to California in the years following the discovery of gold at Sutter’s Mill in 1848.
On the morning of November 23, 1850, Mr. John Oakhurst, a professional gambler, is the center of controversy in the town of Poker Flat. Because he won several thousand dollars, he senses that he is in danger of being hanged or, at best, run out of town. His knack for survival is hard-won. A gambler from Roaring Camp, Oakhurst has been through similar scrapes before. He knows what to expect when the men of Poker Flat get a sudden urge to rid their town of him and three other undesirables: “The Duchess,” a prostitute; “Mother Shipton,” presumably a madam traveling with her; and “Uncle Billy,” a gold thief and drunkard. All of these outcasts are experienced in the ways of the world and not surprised to be scapegoats of Poker Flat’s need to rid itself of bad elements. The story centers around Oakhurst’s reactions, and it is mostly his ability to predict the outcome of any situation by weighing the odds that best illustrates the theme of survival. The outcasts are sent out of town at gunpoint and head toward the camp of Sandy Bar, one day’s ride away. The road to Sandy Bar lies over the beautiful but precipitous mountain range. Because the road is both narrow and difficult, the Duchess refuses to go on, and the party halts in a wooded amphitheater surrounded on three sides by steep granite cliffs. Oakhurst’s gambler sense tells him that the outcasts are not equipped to stop; they lack the provisions to delay their journey. As he surveys the steep cliffs a thousand feet above them, he can also see that the sky is becoming overcast. However, he keeps his fears to himself and reacts as if nothing is wrong. In the past, survival has meant keeping his cards close to the vest and maintaining a poker face. A new twist in their predicament comes in the form of Tom Simson, the “Innocent,” who happens to be coming from Sandy Bar to seek his fortune. He is eloping with 15-year-old Piney Woods, a waitress from the Temperance House. Tom calls it a lucky break when he runs into Oakhurst, even though the gambler won all of Tom’s fortune in a poker game a few months before. Oakhurst, however, sees the arrival of young Tom and Piney as two more mouths to feed while the weather grows more and more ominous. He cannot persuade Tom to keep moving to Poker Flat, but he does not tell him or the others about his ever-increasing feeling of dread.
524â•…â•… Hawthorne, Nathaniel After 10 days of dwindling provisions and 20-foot snow drifts making a prison of their small cabin, escape is no longer possible. Tom and Piney ignore the inevitable by turning to one another. Mother Shipton, the strongest of the party, is the first to die. She tells Oakhurst that she has starved herself to give her week’s worth of food to Piney so she can live a little longer. The only chance for survival is for someone to get back to Poker Flat. Oakhurst, though he could have survived earlier by deserting his fellow outcasts, tells Tom that Piney can be saved if Tom uses the snowshoes Oakhurst has fashioned from an old saddle. He sends him off to make the two-day walk back to Poker Flat. As night falls, Oakhurst gathers enough fuel to heat the cabin for several more days before leaving himself. By the next morning, both the Duchess and Piney realize their fate. The storm is at its worst, and the snow has started to invade the cabin. The fire they had built dies way, and the two huddle together, dying in each other’s arms. Tom does return with help, but it is too late. Not only are the Duchess, Piney Woods, and Mother Shipton dead, but also the men of Poker Flat find the body of John Oakhurst buried beneath the snow under a tree. On the tree he pinned the two of clubs with his epitaph. He chose to end his life rather than freeze to death or starve. His gambler philosophy and instincts for survival finally catch up with him. Gary Kerley
Hawthorne, Nathanielâ•… “The Birth-mark”â•… (1846)
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Birth-mark” tells the story of a scientist named Aylmer and his inability to see past a birthmark on his wife’s face. The story charts the progress of Aylmer’s obsession and its repercussions on his life. Aylmer is married to a beautiful woman, yet he is unable to look past a singular hand-shaped blemish on her cheek. Throughout the story he focuses on the mark until both he and his wife become miserable, she even more so than he. A man of science, Aylmer wishes to experiment on the mark in an effort to remove it, to which his heartbroken wife agrees. When the
day arrives on which the experiment is to take place, Hawthorne introduces Aylmer’s assistant, the roughlooking Aminadab. Despite his haggard appearance, Aminadab does not share Aylmer’s crude obsession with the mark and suggests another plan of action, which is quickly ignored. At this point Hawthorne shows the difference between husband and wife, when Georgiana finds a record of Aylmer’s past, failed experiments and comes to love him more for his flaws. As Aylmer is incapable of the same type of love, the experiment finally takes place. The mark is removed, but Georgiana dies in the process. The story ends with Hawthorne offering up a moral lesson to his readers: Blemishes and imperfections are what make us human, and to try to remove them is a sin in itself. Aylmer’s flaws make him unable to understand, or even hear, this message. Ronald Davis
Love in “The Birth-mark”
In “The Birth-mark,” Nathaniel Hawthorne offers two contrasting views of love. The story centers around Aylmer, a renowned scientist, and his wife, Georgiana. Aylmer has based his life on experimentation, devoting himself primarily to the study of science. The only way Aylmer’s love for his wife can exceed his love for science is “by intertwining itself with his love of science, and uniting the strength of the latter to its own.” Georgiana, on the other hand, loves Aylmer unconditionally. Her happiness is dependent upon his. For this reason, when he begins to take issue with a birthmark on her cheek, her perception of the mark quickly changes. To this point she has looked at the mark as a charm, but when Aylmer tells her that it “shocks” him, she is irrevocably hurt. Aylmer’s discontent with the mark, and therefore his wife, grows by leaps and bounds until he becomes obsessive about the blemish. He begins to dream about it and verbalizes his discontent in his sleep, which Georgiana hears. This pains her even more. She finally asks if he is capable of removing the mark from her face, and Aylmer, in love not only with science but also with his belief in his own ability, tells Georgiana that he is capable. Georgiana insists that he try to remove it, stating that as long as her mark upsets her husband, she is willing to
“The Birth-mark”â•…â•… 525 give up her life. Georgiana’s love for him is so great that she is willing to give up her life in an attempt to make him content with her; further, her own hatred for the birthmark has now surpassed her husband’s because of her love for him. Aylmer’s behavior, on the other hand, indicates that his love for his wife is now even more secondary to his love for science, as he has already put a great deal of thought into the surgery that would remove the mark. Aylmer’s love/obsession with science causes the tale to build toward its climax—the attempted removal of the birthmark. Aylmer takes Georgiana into his laboratory and, with the help of Aminadab, his rough and dirty assistant, begins preparations for the experiment. As the two men prepare, Aminadab offers up a view of love much closer to that of Georgiana’s, saying that if he were married to her, he’d never part with the mark. This comment is quickly forgotten, as Aylmer focuses on making Georgiana more comfortable. This suggests a certain degree of caring for his wife, although at this point it seems that Aylmer looks at her more as the subject of his experiment than his love. While Georgiana waits for Aylmer, she begins to browse his collection of journals. One contains all of her husband’s experiments; as she reads through it, she realizes that the majority of his successes were by-products of failed experiments. His failures make him more human, and cause her to “love him more profoundly than ever.” His imperfections have made him more human and caused her love for him to grow. Aylmer, on the other hand, loves Georgiana less as a person and more as a potential experiment, because of her “imperfection.” If he succeeds, his love for her will grow, but only because she will represent his own ability to change nature, to play God. By tale’s end, Aylmer succeeds in removing the mark. He gives Georgiana a liquid-filled goblet to drink, and she falls into a deep sleep. As she rests, the mark disappears, and Aylmer begins to rejoice. As Georgiana wakes, he praises both the success of his experiment as well as her perfection but still fails to mention his love for her. Georgiana, however, continues to put Aylmer’s interests ahead of hers; the liquid given to her has poisoned her body and she is dying, yet her first words upon waking are of
concern for her husband. His happiness now supersedes even her own desire to live. Hawthorne aptly distinguishes between two opposing versions of love in “The Birth-mark.” Aylmer’s love of science and his own intellectual pursuits run just as deep as Georgiana’s love for him, and both characters become obsessive in their love. Also, because Georgiana’s love centers on a desire for the complete happiness of her beloved, she is in love with an entity that can never be satisfied. Aylmer’s hubris can never be sated; there will always be more to learn and more experiments to attempt. Ronald Davis
Science and Technology in “The Birthmark”
An unnatural obsession with science and technology is the catalyst for the major events within “The Birth-mark.” One of the main characters, Aylmer, is a renowned scientist and recluse, having dedicated so much time to scientific pursuits that he has little time for anything else. Even Aylmer’s love for his wife, Georgiana, is second to his love of science. Through Aylmer and Georgiana’s relationship, Hawthorne offers a warning against Aylmer’s reckless experimentation, showing as he does in other works how things can go horribly awry when a desire for intellectual pursuits supersedes a desire for emotional sustenance. Through this relationship, he also explores the nature of obsession and objectification. Early in the story, Aylmer begins to focus on a small blemish marking Georgiana’s cheek. Georgiana is hurt by Aylmer’s comment that he finds the mark shocking, and because she doesn’t wish to cause her husband any distress, she asks him to rid her of the mark. Oblivious to his wife’s sensitivity, Aylmer leaps at the opportunity to perfect her. Having already thought a great deal, and even dreamed, about the process of removing the mark, Aylmer immediately sets into motion a series of experiments designed to destroy it. The next day, the process begins. Aylmer takes Georgiana to his lab and shows her his various experiments. He is invigorated by her presence in his laboratory, most particularly by her attention to and admiration of his tales of scientific discoveries. Thoroughly
526â•…â•… Hawthorne, Nathaniel obsessed with his own knowledge, he can enjoy her presence only when she reflects his love for science. As he explains the history of alchemy, he becomes more animated and lively than we have seen him before. Displaying his intellect for his wife reaffirms his priorities, as his pleasure is not derived from the interaction with her but from the opportunity to have his intellect admired. This is, in part, an effort to reassure her of his abilities. However, while Georgiana waits for him to be ready, she discovers a record of Aylmer’s experiments and comes to find that the grand majority of his successes were actually the unexpected outcomes of failed experiments. Here, Hawthorne comments on the unstable nature of scientific progress: One cannot always predict accurately the outcome of one’s experiments. He is also foreshadowing the tragic outcome of the tale; if Aylmer’s experiments rarely work out the way he wants them to, Georgiana might be in more danger than she thinks. However, rather than grow concerned about Aylmer’s ability and obsession with science, Georgiana grows to love her husband even more for his imperfections. Shortly before conducting his final experiment with Georgiana, Aylmer shows her a container of elixir, which represents the power of science to destroy. It is at this point that Aylmer’s obsession is revealed to be a god complex, and when Georgiana professes her worship of him, he tells her she may admire him more fully after he rids her of the birthmark. While it was clear before that Aylmer’s concern with the mark was selfish, this comment shows that he wants to remove it not just for the pleasure he’d derive from seeing his wife as “flawless,” but also for the twisted sense of importance he would gain from altering nature to please him. As the tale comes to an end, Aylmer’s last experiment completes his pattern of failure, and while the mark does disappear, Georgiana dies in the process. Aylmer’s obsession with science made him dissatisfied with what he had, made him think he could improve it, and the story ends sadly. This tale brings up a number of issues, including the nature of love as well as the morality, or lack thereof, behind human experimentation. Aylmer’s ego has twisted his sense of his own scientific prowess to the point that his wife becomes a test subject
and he becomes a god. Technology is no help to Aylmer and does nothing more than help him to kill his wife. In the end he is left with nothing to show for this latest experiment but another failure, not because he failed to remove the birthmark but because he failed to recognize the value of love over the value of science. Ronald Davis
Work in “The Birth-mark”
Work has the potential to become an all-consuming force in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Birth-mark.” Two of the three main characters, Aylmer and Aminadab, both work in a laboratory. Aylmer is a scientist, and Aminadab is his assistant. While both men focus on furthering scientific knowledge, they do not share the same dedication to their work. Aylmer will risk anything for the sake of discovery, whereas Aminadab tempers his dedication to his work with common sense and human compassion. The final main character, Aylmer’s wife Georgiana, does not hold a traditional job. Instead, her work is to love and care for her husband unconditionally. In this way she is very similar to Aylmer; both characters hold their “work” above all else and cannot be persuaded to deviate from it for any reason. Throughout the story, the work of the two characters intertwines. Aylmer takes it upon himself to attempt to remove a birthmark from Georgiana’s face via scientific means; Georgiana’s attempts to be an ideal wife allow for this experimentation to happen, with no argument as to the safety, or the sanity, of the pursuit. As the story progresses, Aylmer focuses more and more on the removal of the birthmark, sacrificing all other pursuits and allowing his job to invade even his dreams at night. He becomes haunted by the mark, which causes Georgiana to feel bad. In her mind, her birthmark has changed from a mark of her character to a symbol of how she displeases her husband and, in turn, how she is failing at her job. One night Georgiana hears Aylmer speaking of the mark in his sleep, and this provokes a conversation between husband and wife in which they both determine the best course of action to fulfill their respective duties. Aylmer must have the mark out; Georgiana must please her husband, therefore the
The House of the Seven Gablesâ•…â•… 527 two come to the conclusion that work must be done to get rid of it. It is clear at this point in the story that duty has blinded both of them to common sense. Neither will accept the mark for what it is; rather, they have both turned it into something hideous, something hindering their happiness, something it is their duty, as workers, to fix. In preparation to remove the mark, Aylmer takes Georgiana into his laboratory. It is at this time that the reader is finally introduced to Aminadab. Hawthorne describes Aylmer’s assistant in a rough manner, with a ragged appearance and low intelligence, yet it is Aminadab who expresses disapproval of Aylmer’s pursuit. It is ironic that the man who appears so scruffy has the keener understanding. Aminadab is able to see Aylmer’s overzealous dedication to his work, but as is often the case in Hawthorne’s fiction, the wisest person is the one most easily ignored. As Georgiana awaits the removal of the mark, she explores Aylmer’s laboratory and happens upon a record of his prior experiments. In perusing them, she discovers that all of his successes were unexpected outcomes of larger failures. Rather than looking upon this revelation as a blemish on Aylmer’s character, this knowledge compels Georgiana to love him even more, thus further fulfilling her duty as a good wife. The realization of her husband as imperfect allows her to better complete her own work, just as Aylmer’s creation of an imperfection within his wife has provided him with a way in which to further experiment and, if successful, to be a better worker as well. Throughout the story, Aylmer has moved from seeing Georgiana as his wife to seeing her as his latest experiment. Ultimately, Aylmer’s obsession with his work causes Georgiana’s death. The mark disappears, but so does Georgiana’s life force. In typical fashion, Hawthorne ends the story before his characters have any sort of revelation or experience any closure regarding their actions, but it is safe to assume that Aylmer looks upon the experience as an occupational failure rather than the loss of his beloved. Work and work-obsession take on two forms in this story, the most obvious being Aylmer’s blind focus on his experiments, although Georgiana’s
dedication to and love for Aylmer come across as blind pursuits as well. Both are unable to separate existence from work, and this leads to their respective downfalls. In “The Birth-mark,” Hawthorne juxtaposes two very different types of work, scientific and emotional, but shows that, in either one, obsession is capable of transcending boundaries, obliterating rational thought, and destroying happiness. Ronald Davis
Hawthorne, Nathanielâ•… The House of the Seven Gablesâ•… (1851)
Published in 1851, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel The House of the Seven Gables mixes elements of the gothic tale, romance, and realism, while telling the story of the descendants of Matthew Maule, the original proprietor of the land on which the titular house would be built, and Colonel Pyncheon, the man who “asserted plausible claims” to the land. Colonel Pyncheon sees to it that Matthew Maule is tried and hanged for witchcraft, and on the scaffold, Maule points to the colonel and utters, “God will give him blood to drink!” The moral, as Hawthorne phrases it in the preface, is that “the wrongdoing of one generation lives into successive ones,” but the novel also examines the tension between public and private, between community and social stratification, and between different perceptions of the past. The main plot threads revolve around the descendants of Colonel Pyncheon: Hepzibah, Phoebe, Clifford, and Judge Jaffrey, as well as Mr. Holgrave, the photographer whom we later learn is a descendant of Matthew Maule. Judge Jaffrey believes his cousin Clifford knows where the deed to lands in the east is located and threatens to have him sent to a mental asylum if he does not cooperate in the search for the deed. Hepzibah later finds Clifford and the deceased judge in the house, and we learn later that Judge Jaffrey died due to medical problems. The remaining Pyncheons inherit the judge’s country house and decide to move there, leaving behind the House of the Seven Gables. Phoebe and Holgrave pledge to marry. Jeffrey Pettineo
528â•…â•… Hawthorne, Nathaniel
Commerce in The House of the Seven Gables
Hawthorne’s descriptions and characterizations provide a lens through which to examine 19th-century Americans’ attitudes toward wealth and material possessions. The main points of concern are the greed of Colonel Pyncheon and Judge Jaffrey, the episodes related to Hepzibah’s cent-shop, and the mystery surrounding the deed to the lands in the east. Colonel Pyncheon’s greed for Matthew Maule’s land initiates the conflict—“. . . after some thirty or forty years, the site covered by this rude hovel had become exceedingly desirable in the eyes of a prominent and powerful personage, who asserted plausible claims to the proprietorship of this, and a large adjacent tract of land. . . .” The land is the eventual site of the House of the Seven Gables, designed by one of Matthew’s descendants, Thomas. Hawthorne describes the house—and possessions like it—as so impressive that it becomes its own excuse for existence. “There is something so massive, stable, and almost irresistibly imposing, in the exterior presentment of established rank and great possessions, that their very existence seems to give them a right to exist.” Once a seamstress, Hepzibah in her old age is forced to open a “cent-shop” in the house due to her nearsightedness and her “tremulous fingers.” Hepzibah had imagined herself to have been part of the “aristocracy,” but “after sixty years of narrowing means,” she has to “step down from her pedestal of imaginary rank.” This is the point at which Hepzibah is transformed from the “patrician lady” to the “plebian woman.” At first, Hepzibah is reluctant to appear to society in a business capacity, having once considered becoming a teacher. After her first day at the shop, Hepzibah feels that “the shop would prove her ruin, in a moral and religious point of view, without contributing very essentially towards even her temporal welfare.” Hepzibah’s customers include Uncle Venner, who doles out advice such as “Give no credit!” and “Never take paper money!” One of the townspeople, Dixey, comments on Hepzibah’s scowl as something that prevents her from retaining customers—“Why, her face—I’ve seen it . . her face is enough to frighten the Old Nick himself . . . People can’t
stand it, I tell you! She scowls dreadfully, reason or none, out of pure ugliness of temper!” Another townsperson indicates that such shops are doomed to failure due to all the competition. “This business of keeping cent-shops is overdone, like all kinds of trade, handicraft and bodily labor,” to which Dixey responds, “Poor business!” When Phoebe arrives at the house, she brings a new energy and spirit to the environment, even influencing the operations of the shop, exclaiming at one point, “We must renew our stock, Cousin Hepzibah!” The townsperson and Dixey once again consider the Pyncheons’ good fortune at the end of the novel as Dixey reflects, in a reversal of her earlier sentiment, “Pretty good business!” The setting of the cent-shop provides Hawthorne with a vehicle through which to examine the personality of Hepzibah as well as the tension between social classes and Americans’ attitudes toward wealth and commodities. In contrast to the cent-shop are settings such as the garden, which are described in more metaphysical terms. Another commercial concern is the deed to a “vast, and as yet unexplored and unmeasured tract of eastern lands.” The lands in Maine are “more extensive than many a dukedom, or even a reigning prince’s territory, on European soil.” The territory was eventually given over to “more favored individuals” and “partly cleared and occupied by actual settlers.” Hawthorne describes the claim as something almost laughable and unsubstantial: “This impalpable claim, therefore resulted in nothing more solid than to cherish, from generation to generation, an absurd delusion of family importance, which all along characterized the Pyncheons.” However, the claim turns out to be nothing more than a piece of worthless parchment for which Judge Jaffrey forces Clifford to suffer. Holgrave later discovers the deed hidden in the recess of a wall, covered by a portrait of Colonel Pyncheon. Thus, Judge Jaffrey’s desire for the deed resulted in the false imprisonment of Clifford and the alienation of Hepzibah. Commerce, therefore, operates on one hand as something necessary and even laudable, as it requires tremendous effort and a willingness to take risks. On the other hand, commercialism can become
The House of the Seven Gablesâ•…â•… 529 something destructive if pursued with unmitigated greed and avarice, as in the case of the colonel and Judge Jaffrey. Jeffrey Pettineo
Community in The House of the Seven Gables
How the Pyncheons deal with their declining social status despite generations of “aristocracy” is a major concern for Hawthorne. Hepzibah, in particular, becomes the “new plebian woman” and is forced to deal with the larger community after she establishes her cent-shop. Clifford must also learn to reintegrate into society after the debilitating effects, both mental and physical, of almost 30 years in prison. Phoebe helps both Hepzibah and Clifford recover some sense of each character’s respective place as part of humankind in broader terms, rather than simply as part of a particular social class. Hepzibah’s initial contact with the larger community is manifest through her cent-shop business, with initial visits from Holgrave, the little boy (whom the narrator describes as an “urchin”), and townsfolk identified as Dixey and Dixey’s friend. The townsfolk are initially skeptical about Hepzibah as well as the potential success of her shop, noticing her dreadful scowl born out of “ugliness of temper.” Hepzibah worries about the disregard of the townsfolk: “She was absurdly hurt, moreover, by the slight and idle effect that her setting up shop—an event of such breathless interest to herself—appeared to have upon the public . . . they cared nothing for her dignity, and just as little for her degradation.” Like Hepzibah, Clifford also has a difficult time attempting to deal with society. The “Arched Window” chapter gives us glimpses into the longing of Clifford to “dive” into the “river of life” as he witnesses an entertainer stopping under an elm to play music on his organ. Clifford is at once scared and delighted by the sight: “With a shivering repugnance at the idea of personal contact with the world, a powerful impulse still seized on Clifford, whenever the rush and roar of the human tide grew strongly audible on him.” Hawthorne describes the fascination as generating a human longing for connection: “It might so fascinate him, that he would
hardly be restrained from plunging into the surging stream of human sympathies.” Clifford’s desire manifests in an attempt to jump down from the window frame, but Hepzibah and Phoebe interpret this action as a possible suicide attempt. Clifford, however, believes that if he had survived the jump, he would have been a better man for it: “Fear nothing—it is over now—but had I taken that plunge, and survived it, methinks I would have made me another man!” Clifford sees this as an attempt not only to rejoin the community, but also to regain a sense of what it means to be human, to experience connections of filial love, what the narrator refers to as “the broken links of brotherhood.” Moreover, as Clifford watches Phoebe walk to church, he muses to Hepzibah that he could possibly see himself in prayer once again, if he was surrounded by other people praying in a communal church setting: “↜‘Were I to be there,’ he rejoined, ‘it seems to me that I could pray once more, when so many human souls were praying all around me!’↜” Later in the novel, when Clifford and Hepzibah are traveling in the railroad car, Hepzibah feels herself “apart from humankind,” but Clifford is elated at the thought of being among other human beings: “Here we are, in the world, Hepzibah!—in the midst of life!—in the throng of our fellow beings!” Compared to Clifford and Hepzibah, Phoebe is a much more personable and integrated member of the community, as she never has to face the hardships Clifford underwent, nor the shame that Hepzibah feels about her new status. “Phoebe, it must be understood, was that one little offshoot of the Pyncheon race to whom we have already referred, as a native of a rural part of New England, where the old fashions and feelings of relationship are still partially kept up.” Moreover, Phoebe’s experiences regarding the mingling of classes were not considered “improper”: “In her own circle, it was regarded as by no means improper for kinsfolk to visit one another, without invitation, or preliminary and ceremonious warning.” Phoebe, therefore, becomes an exemplar for social integration. Hawthorne’s own experiences in helping establish the utopian community at Brook Farm were probably responsible, at least in part, for his concern with community and brotherhood, themes
530╅╅ Hawthorne, Nathaniel � represented most concretely by the thoughts, feelings, actions, and relationships of Hepzibah, Clifford, and Phoebe. Jeffrey Pettineo
Illness in The House of the Seven Gables
Many of the Pyncheons in The House of the Seven Gables appear to be suffering from mental illness or, as Holgrave calls it, “lunacy.” Clifford, Hepzibah’s brother, is initially described as suffering from a sort of psychosomatic illness as a result of having been incarcerated. Moreover, before Phoebe arrives, the House of the Seven Gables is personified as a diseased entity, beset by corruption and decay. The primary sufferer from illness is Clifford, who was falsely tried and convicted of murdering Colonel Pyncheon, the patriarch of the Pyncheon family. He has been incarcerated for 27 years, an event that Hawthorne likens to a burial: “. . . this long-buried man was likely, for some reason or another, to be summoned forth from his living tomb.” Hepzibah, Clifford’s sister, and Phoebe, cousin of Hepzibah, Clifford, and Judge Jaffrey, first meet Clifford as he walks in halting fashion down a staircase, much like an old man. The narrator notes that “. . . there were no tokens that his physical strength might not have suffered for a free and determined gait. It was the spirit of the man, that could not walk.” Clifford longs for happiness, but keeps reinforcing in his own mind the mental illness others have projected on him. “Alas, poor Clifford! You are old, and worn with troubles that ought never have befallen you. You are partly crazy. . . .” Judge Jaffrey even threatens at one point to send Clifford away to an asylum if he does not cooperate in helping Jaffrey find the deed to lands “in the east,” but this reveals only Jaffrey’s outward cruelty toward Clifford and his using of Clifford for the sake of material gain. Hawthorne vividly describes the psychological effect that others may have on a sick person. “The sick in mind, and perhaps in body, are rendered more darkly and hopelessly so, by the manifold reflection of their disease, mirrored back from all quarters, in the deportment of those about them; they are compelled to inhale the poison of their own health, in infinite repetition.” In “The Flight
of Two Owls” chapter, Clifford begins to reclaim some of his youthful spirit and happiness as he gets a chance to converse with an intellectual traveling on the same train. It is partly Phoebe’s concern for Clifford, though, that helps him regain some of his “spiritual health” by novel’s end. Phoebe is careful to always maintain a cheery demeanor around Clifford for fear that the opposite will exacerbate Clifford’s ill health. Hawthorne frequently contrasts Phoebe with Clifford, associating Phoebe with growth, vibrancy, and youth, and Clifford with darkness, shadows and old age. The other main “character” that is afflicted with disease is the House of the Seven Gables itself. The spring that feeds the house’s well begins to lose some of its nourishing qualities after Colonel Pyncheon occupies the mansion: “. . . it is certain that the water of Maule’s Well, as it continued to be called, grew hard and brackish. Even such we find it now; and any old woman of the neighborhood will certify, that it is productive of intestinal mischief to those who quench their thirst there.” Just as Phoebe’s youth, spirit, and beauty help Clifford return to health, so too do these characteristics aid in the “rejuvenation” of the house. Phoebe’s “genial spirit” and work ethic help to erase the “grime and sordidness” of the house. Holgrave, the daguerreotypist, descendant of Matthew Maule and later husband of Phoebe, also notes the impoverished state of the house, but refers to its purification as more a metaphorical destruction of all things old, including institutions. He claims the grime and sordidness of the house is the result of the “crystallization on its walls” of the breath of those who have lived there in “discontent and anguish.” Thus, his attraction to Phoebe is also a metaphorical attraction to the regenerative power of youth and idealism. Holgrave also believes that the youth of Phoebe has shielded her from the effects of the “lunacy” that has infected the bloodlines of the Pyncheons. The most common antidotes for the illnesses witnessed in the novel are brotherhood, companionship, and compassion, and these elements conspire to return both the house and Clifford to their former states. Hawthorne also employs health and illness metaphors in order to comment on and develop other themes. For example, Clifford’s “ill-
“Rappaccini’s Daughter”â•…â•… 531 ness of spirit” and the decay of the titular house are a direct result of the effects of greed, treachery, and corruption. Jeffrey Pettineo
Hawthorne, Nathanielâ•… “Rappaccini’s Daughter”â•… (1844)
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “Rappaccini’s Daughter” is one of his most widely read short stories. It was published in 1846 as part of the collection Mosses from an Old Manse in which other well-known stories such as “The Birth-mark” and “The Artist of the Beautiful” were also included. The tale is set in medieval Padua, in Italy. A young medical student, Giovanni Guasconti, arrives in the town and finds lodging in a building kept by Lisabetta, an elderly housekeeper. Giovanni’s room directly oversees a beautiful garden that displays all kinds of strange plants. As he is gazing into the garden he sees an old man, Giacomo Rappaccini, and his young, beautiful daughter, Beatrice, who lives confined within the walls that surround the garden. Giovanni falls in love with Beatrice and trespasses the door of the garden in order to talk with her. He ignores the advice of Professor Pietro Baglioni, who warns him against the deathly nature of Rappaccini’s experiments with plants. As the story progresses we learn that the plants that grow in the garden have a poisonous nature and only Beatrice is able to touch them without protection because her father has rendered her, like the plants he cultivates, poisonous to whoever touches her. Eventually, Beatrice dies after drinking an antidote that Giovanni has obtained from Baglioni in an effort to both free Beatrice from her poisonous nature and save himself from the same effects, since Rappaccini, in his desire to find a suitable companion for Beatrice, has rendered Giovanni poisonous. “Rappaccini’s Daughter” provides an insightful criticism of the dangers of scientific pride, which ultimately leads to isolation and death. The scientist’s obsession to outwit nature and the consequences this obsession brings onto those that surround him is a theme that Hawthorne explored in other texts, such as “The Birth-mark.” Teresa Requena
Death in “Rappaccini’s Daughter”
In “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” Nathaniel Hawthorne chooses a garden as the main setting for the action of the story. It apparently echoes the Garden of Eden in its bountiful presence of plants and herbs. Hawthorne, however, distorts the idyllic image to turn the garden into a walled space, separated from the outside world, whose inhabitants, Beatrice and Giacomo Rappaccini, also live isolated lives. Hawthorne’s depiction of the mysterious garden in gothic terms—a ruined marble fountain, a wreathed plant around a statue—soon discloses the deathly trap it represents. Only the water that flows from the fountain seems to be an “immortal spirit” amongst deathly creatures. Such an impression begins to take hold when Giovanni first sees Rappaccini, whose sickly look quickly puts him in clear opposition to the exuberance of the garden, in which plants seem to grow with no limit. Like the marble fountain or the marble vases, we are told that the scientist’s heart is equally dead, with “a face singularly marked with intellect and cultivation, but which could never, even in his more youthful days, have expressed much warmth of heart.” The garden’s malignant secret is revealed to Giovanni little by little. When he observes Rappaccini moving among the plants, he sees that the scientist is careful not to allow any portion of his skin to be in direct contact with them, not knowing that the plants’ poisonous nature makes their touching impossible without protection. Such carefulness raises suspicions in Giovanni, who imagines a deadly malice of the garden. However, it is not only the scientist who seems to hide a secret. As he observes Beatrice from his window, Giovanni notices the easiness with which she moves among the plants, without any protection. Later, he observes the killing power of Beatrice’s breath on lizards and insects, and the withering effect that Beatrice has on the bouquet that Giovanni gives her. Giovanni’s perception finds confirmation when he learns from his friend Professor Baglioni about Rappaccini’s experiments. In his desire to outwit nature, the isolated scientist has been experimenting with plants and he has transformed them into extremely beautiful poisonous creatures that are also
532â•…â•… Hawthorne, Nathaniel bringers of death. Thus, Rappaccini is presented as an egotistical character whose only design in life is to advance in his knowledge of science by what the scientific community considers to be unethical means. It is such forbidden procedures that have earned Rappaccini a bad reputation among the scientific community. Hawthorne’s tale condemns that attitude when he describes the scientist as being willing to “sacrifice human life, his own among the rest, or whatever else was dearest to him, for the sake of adding so much as a grain of mustard seed to the great heap of his accumulated knowledge.” That Rappaccini’s efforts result in the addition of something as small as a grain of mustard clearly poses a criticism of the man’s immoderate ambition, which brings not only isolation but also death to what he seems to love most, his daughter. Although now aware that Beatrice’s touch or breath is deadly to anything raised outside the garden, Giovanni falls in love with Beatrice. Soon he realizes that he, too, has become as poisonous as Beatrice. Like her, he can kill insects with his breath. When he realizes what has happened, Giovanni accuses Beatrice of infecting him despite Beatrice’s claim that her father is the one to blame. In an effort to save them both, Giovanni produces an antidote that Professor Baglioni has given him with the hope that their deathly nature can be purified. Beatrice takes the drink first so that Giovanni can see the effects of the drink before he takes it. The effect of the antidote is contrary to that expected, and Beatrice dies. Thus, she becomes the final victim of Rappaccini’s experiments and his desire to alter the natural course of nature through scientific means. Beatrice’s death at the end of the tale coincides with a tradition of female characters in Hawthorne’s short fiction who suffer in their own flesh the effects of the male’s obsessions and his actions taken in order to achieve a desired aim. As the writer explored in other tales such as “The Birth-mark,” the death of the female character also symbolizes the negative consequences of pursuing an egotistical endeavor, in which the male character is unable to realize that his experiments or desires are incompatible with a social life. Teresa Requena
Isolation in “Rappaccini’s Daughter”
Many of Hawthorne’s short stories are populated by isolated characters that, for different reasons, live their lives apart from the social world. “Rappaccini’s Daughter” provides a neat example of such a theme in the characters of Rappaccini and, most poignantly, Beatrice. The story opens when Giovanni travels north to study at the University of Padua. Once there, he rents a small, gloomy, and dark room in an old building. His initial sadness is somehow relieved when he peers through the window and discovers a beautiful and bountiful garden that holds a variety of strange and mysterious plants and herbs that grow all around. In the middle, there is a decayed fountain that supplies water to an exceedingly beautiful and fragrant flower. As Giovanni continues to observe the garden, the housekeeper explains that it belongs to Doctor Giacomo Rappaccini, a reputed scientist in Italy who grows these plants to make medicines. A few minutes later, he spots Rappaccini walking around the garden wearing thick gloves and a mask so that he does not touch the poisonous plants and herbs nor inhale the fragrance they shed. As the story progresses we learn that Rappaccini has always been guided by an irrational passion for experimentation beyond what is seen as reasonable. His scientific ambition and experimentation with poisonous plants has led to his isolation from the scientific community, which questions his scientific methods and goals. Rappaccini’s loneliness in what seems to be his outdoor laboratory is apparently eased by the presence of his daughter Beatrice, who is described as a beautiful and lively girl. Mysteriously, she is the only one who is able to touch and approach the plants without any protective means. Upon seeing her, however, Giovanni affirms that Beatrice seems another of the plants that Rappaccini has in his garden and, like them, she has to be touched with gloves or approached with a mask. Giovanni’s curiosity toward the garden and the plants it nourishes soon leads to observation of the beautiful Beatrice; little by little, he feels deeply attracted toward her. His interest in the scientist’s daughter impels him to trespass in the garden, and
“Rappaccini’s Daughter”â•…â•… 533 once inside, he meets Beatrice and talks with her. It is in the conversations between the two youngsters inside the garden that Giovanni, and the reader, realize the extent and pain of Beatrice’s isolation in a life severed from any contact with other human beings. Her questions to Giovanni about the world outside the garden wall reveal her lifelong seclusion with the plants and herbs her father has grown. Actually, Giovanni is right in his appreciation that Beatrice cannot be approached without danger since there is a secret behind Beatrice and Rappaccini. As Giovanni learns, the old scientist has fed his daughter on poison since the day she was born as part of an experiment to make her invulnerable to any danger. Later, Beatrice further explains to Giovanni that the very same day of her birth, Rappaccini also created a poisonous plant to grow up alongside Beatrice as a sister. The result is that everything that Beatrice touches inevitably dies, and therefore she has not been able to lead a life among human beings. Her peculiar poisonous nature discloses Beatrice as the most dramatic case of isolation in the story, which is the direct result of her father’s scientific experiments. Rappaccini’s desire to outwit nature led him to experiment with his own daughter regardless of the possible effects on Beatrice’s life. Like other characters such as Aylmer in “The Birth-mark,” Rappaccini’s obsessive pursuit of scientific achievements inevitably leads him and those around him to live a life apart from the social world and human warmth. Thus, Beatrice is the dramatic outcome of the father’s pursuits, and after a life of seclusion in the garden she confesses her unhappiness and misery to Giovanni. The story ends with still another turn of the screw on the theme of isolation when Giovanni realizes that he has also been turned into a poisonous creature. Initially blaming Beatrice, the last paragraphs reveal that it has been Rappaccini who, once more, has defied nature to create another being equal to his lonely daughter, and thus they both stand apart from common men and women. The scientist deems his deed a great victory over nature, while Beatrice and Giovanni realize the doomed future awaiting them. Eventually, Beatrice’s death ends dramatically her lifelong isolation.
The story thus portrays isolation from the social world and human warmth in negative terms by clearly showing the effects it has on the characters and by arguing that isolation is the price to be paid for any obsession. Teresa Requena
Pride in “Rappaccini’s Daughter”
In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s texts the examination of pride figures as a prominent theme. Stories such as “Young Goodman Brown” or “The Minister’s Black Veil” explore the consequences of male characters’ religious pride when these characters assume that their actions will have no effects on their religious principles. In “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” Hawthorne investigates intellectual pride in relation to scientific advancements. The text focuses on Rappaccini and Giovanni’s friend, the professor of medicine Pietro Baglioni. In the case of Rappaccini, his scientific pride leads him to the firm belief that he can outwit nature with his scientific discoveries. In the same way, Professor Baglioni represents another angle of scientific pride in his desire to prove Rappaccini’s experiments wrong. For instance, upon Giovanni’s first meeting with the professor, the sense of old rivalry between Rappaccini and Baglioni is made evident when Giovanni takes the opportunity to mention the scientist’s name. It is then that Baglioni changes his attitude and does not “respond with so much cordiality as he had anticipated.” The reasons for Baglioni’s reluctance seem to be grounded on moral qualms, since he recognizes Rappaccini’s contribution to scientific progress but disapproves of his unethical scientific goals. In this line, Baglioni assures young Giovanni that the main objection to Rappaccini’s practices is that “he cares infinitely more for science than for mankind.” As the conversation progresses, the rivalry between the two scientists surfaces again when Baglioni speculates that Beatrice, with all the instruction she has received from her father, may strip him of his professor’s chair at the university. Baglioni’s thoughts also betray his own scientific pride and ambition when at the end of his conversation with Giovanni he affirms that “it is too insufferable an impertinence in Rappaccini, thus to snatch the lad
534â•…â•… Hawthorne, Nathaniel out of my own hands, as I may say, and make use of him for his infernal experiments” (988). The consequences of the scientific pride that both characters exhibit become clear at the end of the story. It is then that both men see their opportunity to outwit each other. In the case of Baglioni, he discloses Beatrice’s true poisonous nature to Giovanni when he visits the young student in his lodgings and deems Beatrice “the victim of his [Rappaccini’s] zeal for science.” Wishing to amend Rappaccini’s deed, Baglioni offers Giovanni the chance to bring Beatrice back to social life by showing him a little silver vase that contains an effective antidote to the most devastating poison. It is this antidote that, according to the professor, will effectively cure Beatrice from her poisonous nature. However, rather than wishing to save Beatrice from an alienated existence, Baglioni secretly enjoys the opportunity to defeat Rappaccini. To that effect, Baglioni gives Giovanni the vase and the young student goes to meet Beatrice. Baglioni’s revelation has already had a profound effect on Giovanni by inspiring wrath, despair, and doubt about Beatrice and her monstrous nature at the same time that he discovers his own poisonous condition. Upon that realization, Giovanni understands that the only option for him and Beatrice to live their love among society is to resort to Professor Baglioni’s antidote, which Giovanni deems “almost divine in its efficacy.” Thus, Giovanni proposes that both of them shall drink it in order to be purified from their monstrous condition. Beatrice, playing a traditional self-sacrificing female role, offers to drink it first so that Giovanni can examine the effects. The final scene brings all the characters together and again reveals the two scientists’ pride. When Beatrice openly blames her father for having brought the pain of rejection upon her, Rappacini’s answer betrays his pride in his science and in its capacity to surpass the natural laws of life. He calls his daughter “foolish” for not being able to understand the supposed benefits of his experiments, among which he lists the possibility to transcend weakness and defeat by being powerful enough to inflict evil upon anybody. Equally, Beatrice’s death leads the proud professor Baglioni triumphantly to ask Rappaccini
whether Beatrice’s death was really the planned result of his experiment. Teresa Requena
Hawthorne, Nathanielâ•… The Scarlet Letterâ•… (1850)
Set in Puritan Boston, The Scarlet Letter chronicles the life of Hester Prynne. The novel opens as Hester, with her infant Pearl in her arms, is led from the town prison to a scaffold that stands in the marketplace. Hester stands on the scaffold as part of her punishment for adultery; on her chest is a scarlet letter A that the magistrates decree that she must wear. Hester and Pearl live an isolated life on the outskirts of Boston, and Hester makes her living through her needlework skills. She has used these skills to embellish her “A” with flourishes of gold thread, and she dresses Pearl in red and gold as if to emphasize that both are symbols of her adultery. Throughout the novel, Hester keeps two secrets. The first is that her husband, who was to follow her from Europe to the new world, arrived in Boston as she stood upon the scaffold. Remaining anonymous, he lives under the name of Roger Chillingworth. Hester’s second secret is the identity of her lover, the respected young minister Arthur Dimmesdale. Though Hester refuses to publicly name Dimmesdale as Pearl’s father, Chillingworth suspects him. Acting as the minister’s physician, Chillingworth takes up residence with Dimmesdale, all the while trying to ferret out his secret. In his dying moments, Dimmesdale publicly confesses that he is Pearl’s father. Hester and Pearl later leave Boston, but at the novel’s end Hester returns to her seaside cottage and again takes up her scarlet “A.” Hawthorne uses Hester’s story to explore the nature of symbolism and the themes of religion, parenthood, and the individual and society, among others. Laurie A. Sterling
Individual and Society in The Scarlet Letter
The second paragraph of The Scarlet Letter introduces the notion of the social contract when the narrator says, “The founders of a new colony . . . have invariably recognized it among their earli-
The Scarlet Letterâ•…â•… 535 est practical necessities to allot a portion of the virgin soil . . . as the site of a prison.” Once Hester Prynne is ushered through the prison door in the next chapter, the scarlet “A” upon her chest provides a symbolic focus for the novel’s exploration of the relationship between the individual and society. The magistrates clearly intend for the scarlet letter to embody their judgment; they clearly mean to mark Hester as an adulteress through this “A.” And yet Hester silently challenges their laws and their evaluation of her. Using her imagination and her skill with the needle, she embellishes the “A” with “flourishes of gold thread. . . . greatly beyond what was allowed by the sumptuary regulations of the colony.” Like Pearl, the living reflection of the scarlet letter, the luxuriously decorated “A” expresses the “warfare of Hester’s spirit.” Through its exploration of the effects and the efficacy of the scarlet “A,” The Scarlet Letter comments upon the rigid and inflexible social codes of Massachusetts Bay Colony. The most obvious effect of Hester’s punishment is isolation. While she makes a living with her needle, she “inhabited another sphere. . . . like a ghost that revisits the familiar fireside, and can no longer make itself seen or felt.” As a result of the magistrates’ punishment, Hester is transformed. She is robbed of her femininity and her passion, and in her isolation she recognizes that “the world’s law was no law for her.” Similarly, Pearl, who functions both as a character and a symbol in the novel, also suffers. Born an “outcast of the infantile world,” Pearl instinctively knows that she has no place within Puritan society. Without playmates, she occupies herself through imaginary play but tellingly, “she never created a friend.” Always outside of a social structure, Pearl cannot “be made amenable to rules” or to discipline. Contemplating Hester’s profound isolation and the transformation that it evokes, the narrator seems to challenge the efficacy of the “dismal severity of the Puritanic code of law” in a solitary sentence that forms a paragraph: “The scarlet letter had not done its office.” Yet even before this, the novel hints at the shortcomings of Hester’s punishment, for the community at large does not completely accept the rulings of the magistrates. As
Hester continues her life on the outskirts of Boston, the community’s interpretation of her and her letter varies greatly from the magistrates’ original meaning. Hester’s “A,” they claim, stands for “Able” or for “Angel.” By the novel’s end, “the scarlet letter ceased to be a stigma which attracted the world’s scorn and bitterness, and became a type of something to be sorrowed over, and looked upon with awe, yet with reverence too.” While Hester undergoes public punishment, Dimmesdale grapples with his sin privately. He longs to confess his sin publicly but cannot manage to do so until the novel’s end. His relationship to society and social codes best explains his inability. The narrator describes the minister saying, “it would always be essential to his peace to feel the pressure of a faith about him, supporting, while it confined him within its iron framework.” Hester’s experience has forced her outside of her community, but Dimmesdale’s experience has not afforded him this latitude of speculation. He is a prisoner of societal codes: “At the head of the social system . . . he was only the more trammeled by its regulations, its principles, and even its prejudices.” Thus, even when he and Hester resolve to flee Boston, Dimmesdale finds it impossible to leave his socially constructed identity. He is anxious to stay until he preaches the Election Sermon, and he thinks to himself, “At least, they shall say of me . . . that I leave no public duty unperformed, nor ill performed!” While Dimmesdale finally manages confession but not escape, Hester eventually leaves Boston with Pearl. But Hawthorne complicates the relationship between Hester and her Puritan society further at the novel’s end. Despite the freedom of her earlier views, Hester returns to Boston and takes up the scarlet “A” of her own accord, perhaps affirming society’s role in shaping an individual’s identity. Laurie A. Sterling
Parenthood in The Scarlet Letter
Hawthorne modeled the character of Pearl in The Scarlet Letter after his own first born, Una, and while the novel is clearly about sin and retribution, it is also a family drama that emphasizes the import and the power of familial ties. While
536â•…â•… Hawthorne, Nathaniel Hester and Dimmesdale must grapple with their sin, Pearl reminds readers that both Hester and Dimmesdale are parents who bear an obligation to their child. From the second chapter, the novel links Pearl and the scarlet “A” that Hester wears; both are “token[s] of [Hester’s] shame.” Hester emphasizes this connection by dressing Pearl in scarlet and gold, and the novel frequently reminds readers that Pearl is the scarlet letter in human form. Like her dress, Pearl’s behavior also sets her apart. Pearl is impish and capricious; she is the “wild infant,” the “elf-child.” Many in Puritan Boston attribute Pearl’s wild and uncivil behavior to her parentage. Hester remembered “talk of the neighbouring townspeople; who, seeking vainly elsewhere for the child’s paternity, and observing some of her odd attributes, had given out that poor little Pearl was a demon offspring.” Because of such fears, the Puritan magistrates of Boston propose to take the child from Hester. In the face of this challenge to “a mother’s rights,” Hester mounts an argument to maintain custody of her child. She claims that her punishment has made her a better mother: “This badge hath taught me . . . lessons whereof my child may be the wiser and better, albeit they can profit nothing to myself.” Perhaps a stronger argument for Hester’s custody of Pearl can be found in the benefits that motherhood holds for Hester. Pearl becomes a kind of savior for her mother. Pearl’s name tells something of Hester’s feelings for her daughter and her thoughts about motherhood: “she had named the infant ‘Pearl,’ as being of great price,—purchased with all she had,—her mother’s only treasure!” As she grows, Pearl is Hester’s “sole treasure” and “all her world.” As Hester faces the magistrates, she emphasizes the connection between Pearl and the scarlet letter, arguing that while humanity had marked her with the scarlet “A” as a result of her sin, God had given Pearl to her. Pearl, she argues, is her salvation: God gave me the child! . . . He gave her, in requital of all things else, which ye had taken from me. She is my happiness!—she is my torture, none the less! Pearl keeps me here in life! Pearl punishes me too! See ye not, she is
the scarlet letter, only capable of being loved, and so endowed with a million-fold the power of retribution for my sin? Hester’s “unquiet elements” were “soothed away by the softening influences of maternity,” and Pearl keeps Hester connected to the world around her. As Hester leaves Governor Bellingham’s mansion, his sister, a reputed witch, asks Hester to travel with her to the forest to meet with the devil. Hester replies, “I must tarry at home, and keep watch over my little Pearl. Had they taken her from me, I would willingly have gone with thee into the forest,” to which the narrator replies, “Even thus early had the child saved her from Satan’s snare.” Once the magistrates decide that Pearl should remain with Hester, Mr. Wilson asserts that “every good Christian man hath a title to show a father’s kindness to the poor, deserted babe.” It seems, though, that the elf-child cannot be made fully human without paternal influence. In her meetings with Reverend Dimmesdale, Pearl seems instinctively to understand their familial ties, and she challenges the minister to acknowledge their relationship publicly. As Dimmesdale, Hester, and Pearl stand together on the scaffold under the cover of night, Pearl asks, “Wilt thou stand here with mother and me, to-morrow noontide?” It is not until the novel’s second-to-last chapter that Dimmesdale publicly acknowledges his relationship with Hester and Pearl. As he once again stands on the scaffold, the minister asks Pearl to kiss him, and with that kiss, the narrator says, “A spell was broken. . . . and as her tears fell upon her father’s cheek, they were the pledge that she would grow up amid human joy and sorrow, nor forever do battle with the world, but be a woman in it.” The novel’s conclusion gives evidence that Pearl marries, becomes a mother herself, and remains mindful of her mother even after Hester returns to her seaside cottage in Boston. Laurie A. Sterling
Religion in The Scarlet Letter
The Scarlet Letter examines and critiques the theocratic society of Puritan Boston, in which “religion and law were almost identical.” Hawthorne begins
The Scarlet Letterâ•…â•… 537 this examination with the novel’s first chapter, “The Prison Door,” which opens with a “throng of bearded men, in sad-colored garments and steeplecrowned hats . . . assembled in front of a wooden edifice, the door of which was heavily timbered with oak, and studded with iron spikes.” Both the prison and the people tell readers a great deal about the Puritans and their laws—both are hard, stern, and unyielding. The imagery Hawthorne uses in this opening chapter remains consistent throughout the novel. He repeatedly describes the Puritans and their society though imagery of darkness and hardness. The novel’s first sentence also links the Puritans of Boston with Hawthorne’s own Puritan ancestors, whom he describes in the novel’s introductory sketch, “The Custom-House.” Like his heroine, Hester Prynne, Hawthorne also feels the disapproval and the “scorn” of the “stern and blackbrowed Puritans,” and like Hester, Hawthorne uses his Scarlet Letter to challenge the Puritan beliefs, attitudes, and laws. Early in the novel the narrator emphasizes that in this period when “the forms of authority were felt to possess the sacredness of divine institutions,” these Puritan leaders, though “doubtless good men,” were incapable of “sitting in judgment on an erring woman’s heart, and disentangling its mesh of good and evil.” Not only are these men stern and unsympathetic, the novel soon reveals their hypocrisy. Puritan hypocrisy is a theme that surfaces frequently in Hawthorne’s work, and it is particularly apparent in the community’s use of Hester’s needlework. The narrator says that “Deep ruffs, painfully wrought bands, and gorgeously embroidered gloves . . . were readily allowed to individuals dignified by rank or wealth, even while sumptuary laws forbade these and similar extravagances to the plebeian order.” It is hypocrisy that finally dooms Dimmesdale. The minister recognizes the value of publicly confessing his sin. When they meet in the forest, he tells Hester, “Happy are you, Hester, that wear the scarlet letter openly upon your bosom! Mine burns in secret!” and he later exclaims, “We are not, Hester, the worst sinners in the world.” Chillingworth, he realizes, has “violated . . . the sanctity of a human heart,” a transgression that Hawthorne believed
was an unpardonable sin. Despite this revelation, the minister remains unable to publicly confess his own sin until the end of the novel. Earlier, when Dimmesdale tells his congregants that he is “utterly pollution and a lie,” the narrator says, “The minister well knew—subtle, but remorseful hypocrite that he was!—the light in which his vague confession would be viewed. . . . He had spoken the very truth, and transformed it into the veriest falsehood.” Weakness dooms Dimmesdale to hypocrisy; he finds it impossible to live outside of the “iron framework” of Puritan society, and he confesses only in his dying moments. In contrast to Dimmesdale, Hester’s sin is clearly manifest in both the “A” and in her daughter Pearl. As the beadle leads Hester from the prison to the scaffold in chapter 2, he calls Massachusetts Bay Colony a place “where iniquity is dragged out into the sunshine.” Another townsman describes it as “a land where iniquity is searched out, and punished in the sight of rulers and people.” The magistrates, in placing the “A” on Hester’s chest, mean to make her “a living sermon against sin.” Despite this, Hester remains a constant challenge to Puritan laws and beliefs, as Hawthorne’s numerous comparisons between Hester and Anne Hutchinson emphasize. A Puritan woman, Hutchinson gained a following when she began to hold weekly meetings to discuss sermons in her home. In defiance of Puritan beliefs, she began to preach salvation through faith and God’s revelation to the individual through inner experience. Her popularity and her perceived heresy brought about a political crisis, and she was eventually banished from Massachusetts Bay Colony for antinomianism (being opposed to religious authority). If it were not for Pearl, the narrator says, Hester “might have come down to us in history, hand in hand with Anne Hutchinson, as the foundress of a religious sect.” Like Hutchinson, Hester finds that “the world’s law was no law for her.” While Hester and her beliefs do not bring about the political upheaval that Hutchinson did, even at the novel’s end she comforts other outcasts with “her firm belief, that, at some brighter period, when the world should have grown ripe for it, in Heaven’s own time, a new truth would be revealed.” And by the novel’s end she seems to have brought about some change
538â•…â•… Hawthorne, Nathaniel in Puritan attitudes and beliefs, for the townspeople, and even the magistrates themselves read the “A” as representing “able” and “angel.” Laurie A. Sterling
Hawthorne, Nathanielâ•… “Young Goodman Brown”â•… (1835, 1851)
Nathaniel Hawthorne first published the short story “Young Goodman Brown” in 1835 and it was later collected in The Snow Image and Other TwiceTold Tales (1852). In this story Hawthorne reveals his preoccupation with history, particularly that of Puritan New England, and issues of guilt, sin, individual conscience, and social morality. Many of these themes resurface in Hawthorne’s best-known work, The Scarlet Letter, which is also set in Puritan New England. In the story, the young Puritan, Goodman Brown, takes leave of his wife Faith one evening for a solitary expedition into the forest. As he ventures deeper into the wilderness, Brown encounters many of his neighbors, including the religious and political leaders of his community. All seem eager to participate in a sinister ritual in the dark woods. At an altar in the midst of the congregation, Brown sees his young wife. At the last moment, he calls upon Faith to resist temptation. Suddenly, the whole scene vanishes and the young man is left alone. But forever after that night, Brown is gloomy and distrustful, even of members of his own family. Human nature is put to the test in this disturbing story, as Brown’s perception of his experience challenges the notion that people are basically good. The story raises issues concerning innocence and experience, individual and society, religion, alienation, and the American dream. The cost of following one’s conscience is also a prominent theme here, as it is in many important works of American literature in the 19th century. Mary Goodwin
Individual and Society in “Young Goodman Brown”
A complex and problematic relationship unfolds between the individual and his society in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “Young Goodman Brown” (1835,
1851). The young Puritan Brown is confronted with troubling issues concerning his place in society. As his faith in human nature is tested in the course of an evening, Brown must decide if he is better off alone or in company. Does society offer solace and support to the individual, or only mutual guilt and fatal temptation? The story begins as Brown embarks on what seems a solitary journey of self-discovery, taking leave of his wife Faith one night to venture into the woods on a mysterious errand. Brown soon encounters other townspeople in the forest, but the company they offer is not comforting. Brown meets a sinister older man who carries a walking stick shaped like a snake. Amiable at first, the man later tells Brown his ancestors were guilty of injustice and cruel persecution. Brown then sees Goody Cloyse, a townswoman who had taught him his catechism. In the woods, however, the old woman expresses great enthusiasm for witchcraft and dark rituals. As Brown reaches a clearing, he sees many other townspeople gathered for a mysterious ceremony. Standing at the altar, Brown discovers his young wife is also beside him. At the last minute, he calls out to Faith to resist the temptation of evil. Suddenly everything vanishes and he is left alone. The narrator raises the possibility that Brown has dreamed it all; nevertheless, ever after this night, the young man holds himself apart from other townspeople, suspecting all of secret sin. He is a stranger even to his wife, and maintains a gloomy solitude for the rest of his life. The effect of his experience is to make society hateful to him. The plot seems to follow a typical rite of passage, in which a young person leaves his community and undergoes experiences that help him mature. Upon his return, he takes his place as an adult in the community. But in Hawthorne’s tale, society seems to offer the individual not comfort, stability, or salvation but rather guilt, complicity, and moral ruin. Early in his journey Brown expresses fears of the “Indians” in the forest. Soon, however, he learns that the real threat is from his own townspeople, even the most apparently respectable among them. Brown’s experience may help him to “grow up,” but it makes him unsuited for his community. Issues of religion and social interaction intersect in the story. As the Puritan church is based on the
“Young Goodman Brown”â•…â•… 539 Calvinist conviction of the total depravity of humankind, so Brown, after witnessing the secret evil of the townspeople, ends convinced that “evil is the nature of mankind.” In this story, the good and the wicked are mixed together in an abased version of democracy, and the wicked inevitably corrupt the good, as seems the case with Brown’s wife Faith. The community is prone to violence and mass hysteria, as demonstrated in the witch-hunts in which Brown’s ancestors participated. These themes are also central to Hawthorne’s most famous novel, The Scarlet Letter. The story seems to mock American political ideals as well. Community bonds in early America were described in terms like “covenant,” “communion,” and “congregation,” but this lexicon is perverted in Hawthorne’s story, and “congregation” becomes coven or den of evil. The challenge of American civil life has always been in how to balance the needs of the individual against the good of the group. The new democracy had to be forged by common consent, by people working together. But it is very difficult to achieve social cohesion if, as Hawthorne’s story suggests, you cannot trust your neighbor. The story seems to offer the possibility of individual salvation, even in the face of a corrupt society. Brown’s ability to resist the ominous ritual seems to save him; the dark vision disappears and he is left alone. Brown makes his own decision regarding his fate in rejecting what he perceives as evil in society. However, the result is that Brown becomes estranged from the townspeople, even from his own family. This suggests that the cost of the individual’s decision to follow his or her conscience is social ostracism. Much American literature, especially in the 19th century, is concerned with the issue of individual conscience and its cost. In essays and fiction, writers like Emerson, Thoreau, Hawthorne, Melville, and Twain exhorted readers to follow their own sense of right, even if it meant acting counter to the interests and wishes of the majority. Mary Goodwin
Innocence and Experience in “Young Goodman Brown”
As Hawthorne’s tale begins, young Goodman Brown sets off on a solitary expedition into a dark, forbid-
ding forest. Brown is a Puritan “everyman,” and his journey can be seen as an initiation into knowledge and experience of the world along the road of life. In tracing the chronological progress of Brown’s life from young adulthood to old age and the grave, the story charts the effects of his experience on his character and convictions. But Brown’s journey does not proceed as the reader might expect. In the first place, the young man sets forth at sunset, a time of day associated with the onset of old age and death rather than new beginnings. It is also strange that the newlywed Brown leaves his young wife, Faith, behind, rebuffing her when she tries to persuade him to stay the night with her. And although he seems willing to make the trip, Brown at times expresses reluctance to proceed on what he refers to as his “evil” mission. His journey is thus a solitary and troubling undertaking in which he moves further and further away from “faith.” As Brown travels deeper into the forest, he encounters other travelers who unsettle rather than comfort him with their company. His first companion is an older man who carries a staff in the shape of a snake. This sinister person says that he had known Brown’s ancestors, shocking the young man by revealing that his forebears had not been good Christians at all but oppressive and cruel. The man also claims that he is on intimate terms with many others in Brown’s community who are respected for their high position and apparently unimpeachable character. An old woman who had taught Brown his catechism appears in the forest, and the young man is disturbed by her eagerness to join the sinister occasion of the night. The stranger with the staff warns Brown that everyone, no matter how pure or venerable in appearance, harbors secrets of evil deeds. The final blow to Brown’s innocent, naïve faith in the goodness of human nature comes with the evidence that his wife is among the nighttime congregation. Spying a pink ribbon of the sort that Faith wears on her cap, Brown declares that the world is an evil place and belongs to the devil. He rushes into what appears to be a witches’ mass in the forest, and sees his wife there. They stand together to be joined in an unholy marriage attended by those townsfolk he had once respected.
540â•…â•… Hawthorne, Nathaniel Brown loses the innocence of his youthful convictions at this altar. Later, after he returns to the village, he suspects everyone he meets of secret vice, coldly rejecting even the tender touch of his young wife. His mood darkens over the course of his life and he dies a gloomy old man. In the span of a night, Brown learns that youth is not necessarily innocent, nor age venerable and wise. He goes to his grave convinced that human nature is evil and human beings are easy prey to temptation, even those whose hearts are as pure as his wife’s. Hawthorne’s tale thus seems to accord with the Puritan view of human nature as corrupt and innately depraved, stained by the original sin of Adam and Eve. With Brown the reader may suspect that “sin is but a name” and innocence merely an illusion. However, this interpretation is twisted by hints in the last paragraphs that Goodman Brown has dreamed the whole episode. Beside Faith at the fateful altar, Brown had exhorted her to look to heaven. At that moment, the entire sinister congregation had vanished and Brown was left alone in the forest. In suggesting that Brown dreamed it all, the narrator implies that the young man made up his own mind to distrust others, possibly projecting his own sense of guilt onto those around him. The ambiguous ending thus allows a variety of interpretations of the tale. Perhaps we are meant to understand that the world is not an innocent place, a somber lesson taught through hard experience of evil. Or the tale may teach that the experience of life is what one makes of it, with innocence and guilt only matters of perspective shaped by temperament and circumstance. Another possibility is that the loss of faith leads to a loss of innocence. Hawthorne seems to entertain all of these possibilities in this and other important works. Mary Goodwin
Religion in “Young Goodman Brown”
A major theme in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s story “Young Goodman Brown” is the place of religion in American life. Although it was written in the 19th century, the story is set 200 years earlier, in a Puritan community in colonial Massachusetts. The Puritans’ Massachusetts Bay Colony was a theocracy, meaning a community in which the state is dominated by
a church, and civil law has its basis in religious law (in the Puritans’ case, biblical law). In such a place, religion naturally plays a dominant role in many aspects of life. “Young Goodman Brown” reflects the importance of matters of faith in daily life in that period, with key plot events stressing in particular the social aspects of religion. Goodman Brown, a young member of a Puritan community, leaves his wife Faith one night to embark on a mysterious mission into the forest near his village. On his way out of town he passes the meetinghouse, which is the Puritan place of worship and the center of social life for the community. This landmark serves to remind the reader of the deeply communal nature of the Puritan religion. The matter of social interaction in church activities takes on deeper meaning as Brown travels into the woods: He starts out alone but soon encounters other townspeople, all of whom he identifies as members of his church. There is Goody Cloyse, an old woman who had taught Brown his catechism. The young man also spies the town’s minister and deacon in the woods. Brown has always thought of his neighbors as pious, upstanding members of the community. Now he is shocked to find them all in the woods on the same dark mission, apparently bound for a witches’ mass. The social aspects of religion in the story encompass history, including that of Brown’s family. On his way into the forest, Brown is met by a sinister old man, a devil-like figure holding a staff that resembles a snake. The man tells Brown that he knew his ancestors to be cruel persecutors, not the good Christians Brown had thought them to be. He also tells Brown that many pious-seeming townspeople are stained with secret sin. Brown’s conversation with the old man points to the hypocrisy at the heart of Puritan religious practice. Hawthorne’s story explores the deeply personal as well as social aspects of religion. Although shocked to discover that his townspeople are hypocritical sinners, Brown is himself in the forest bent on some dark purpose, which raises questions about his own moral credibility. Brown’s mission is a kind of religious parody: In order to pursue his “quest,” he must leave behind Faith—his wife—and, apparently, his beliefs and moral convictions. His destination is a sinister
Catch-22â•…â•… 541 altar, a parody of a church gathering. For Brown the experience in the woods has a pernicious influence on his own spiritual development; after that night, his faith in religion and in other people, including his wife, is destroyed. Concluding that the world is evil, Brown goes to his grave a bitter old man. Personal choice in matters of faith seems an important issue in the story, with the individual urged to follow his conscience even if it means standing in opposition to his community. Brown has a choice of whether or not to enter the forest and take part in the ritual. At the dark altar, when he thinks he sees the shade of his mother urging him to resist evil, he cries out to his wife. At that moment, the scene vanishes and Brown is left to wonder whether he only dreamed it. However, following his conscience and making the “right” decision doesn’t guarantee Brown a happy life; rather, the experience causes him to lose faith in humanity. Saved from one evil, he is, as a consequence, poisoned to life and human society. The story hints at the insufficiency of moral religious life, either as a means to root evil out of the human heart, or as a comfort to the righteous individual who turns away from corrupt human society. In “Young Goodman Brown,” issues of religion and faith touch all aspects of a person’s life, as an individual, in the family, and as a member of society. In this story religion is trailed by its shadow, the sinister secret desires of the heart. As in Hawthorne’s famous novel The Scarlet Letter, which is also set in Puritan New England, the quest for meaning in life is woven into issues of religion and faith, with the individual faced with the difficult decision of standing alone against his community. Mary Goodwin
HELLER, JOSEPHâ•… Catch-22â•… (1961)
Catch-22 is a brilliant satire of the military that illustrates the darkly humorous side of the insanity that is warfare. No organization or institution is safe from the ire of Heller’s pen. He sends up the military bureaucracy, free-market enterprise, organized religion, and social class. Catch-22 is the story of John Yossarian and his quest to survive World War II. He has only
one problem: Catch-22. Catch-22 is the military bureaucratic rule that states that any soldier must be removed from combat duty if he is deemed insane; however, removing oneself from an endless continuation of suicidal missions is an act that proves a soldier is sane enough to continue to fly and fight. This institutional catch traps Yossarian on the island of Pianosa in perpetual danger, as the war rages on and thousands of people whom he has never met are trying to kill him. Catch-22 is a landmark of American fiction, one of the rare works of literature that defined a century and introduced a new term into the lexicon of the English language. Heller’s masterful and humorous condemnation of warfare continues to entertain, inspire, and educate readers from the high school senior to the retiree. Heller’s comedic portrayal of men seeking only to survive and those who seek only to profit from the iniquities of humanity destroys the fallacy that war is romantic and for all time defines survival as the one true heroic act of war. Drew McLaughlin
Heroism in Catch-22
Catch-22 is a story of heroes and cowards. The island of Pianosa, the fictional setting of the novel, is populated by a motley crew of cowardly heroes and heroic cowards. Such is the maddening, paradoxical world of Catch-22. John Yossarian is an unlikely protagonist, a bombardier by trade, a coward by nature. He is heroic through his cowardice. Yossarian is driven by one thing: survival. He is described as having given up his soldierly mission in favor of saving himself. “Yossarian was a lead bombardier who had been demoted because he no longer gave a damn whether he missed or not. He had decided to live forever or die in the attempt, and his only mission each time he went up was to come down alive” (29). Yossarian lies and schemes his way out of combat duty and into the hospital, always searching and exhausting every opportunity to escape the clutches of Catch22. He thinks, There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for
542â•…â•… Heller, Joseph one’s own safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions . . . Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22. Catch-22 imprisons Yossarian through his own rationality. Yossarian’s recognition of the insanity of his predicament proves his sanity. Yossarian battles not only Catch-22, but also Colonel Cathcart, his commanding officer. Cathcart is a cowardly hero. An officer devoted to duty, country, and winning the war would not normally invite admonition; however, whereas Yossarian is driven by self-preservation, Cathcart is driven by self-promotion. He wants to receive a promotion to general. He is unconcerned with the mental or physical welfare of his men, and seeks only fame and glory in his petulant drive for career advancement. To achieve his goal, he volunteers his squadron for only the most dangerous missions, increasing the unit’s medals and citations; he cares little about completing a successful mission and more about collecting great aerial photographs of bombing runs, and continually raises the number of missions required of the squadron before any member is permitted an honorable discharge. Whenever Yossarian nears the magic number, Cathcart raises the mission total and Yossarian’s subsequent refusal to fly into danger in perpetuity keeps him in the air. Every mission Yossarian flies increases the likelihood of his death, and he soon realizes Cathcart will never allow him to achieve his discharge through the bureaucratic system, which forces Yossarian to become inventive in order to skirt the letter of Catch-22 in order to survive. Yossarian’s refusal to fly any more missions affects the unit’s morale: “Morale was deteriorating and it was all Yossarian’s fault. The country was in peril; he was jeopardizing his traditional rights of freedom and democracy by daring to exercise them.” Cathcart attempts to bribe Yossarian, promising to send him home if he agrees to “like” the colonel and not tell the squadron that he is being sent home
as a result of his defiance. Also, Yossarian will be promoted, given another medal for valor, and hailed as a “hero” back in the States. Cathcart hopes that Yossarian’s “heroics” will inspire the men to fly more missions, amplifying the colonel’s chances for promotion. Yossarian flirts with the idea, but ultimately rejects the colonel’s offer. To surrender his beliefs would be a capitulation to Cathcart, and a victory for the proprietors of the army bureaucracy and the creators and enforcers of Catch-22. He says, I’ve flown over seventy goddam combat missions. Don’t talk to me about fighting to save my country. I’ve been fighting all along to save my country. Now I’m going to fight a little to save myself. The country’s not in danger anymore, but I am, . . . . . . The Germans will be beaten in a few months. And Japan will be beaten a few months after that. If I were to give up my life now, it wouldn’t be for my country. It would be for Cathcart. So I’m turning my bombsight in for the duration. Cornered, unable to outwit the system, Yossarian comes to understand that his only true option is to run away. Yossarian displays the courage necessary to defy his commander, his army, and his country in order to save his own life. Yossarian flees Pianosa to Sweden. His most heroic action is this desertion. Catch-22 finds heroism in cowardice. The insanity of war compels men and women to act to achieve contradictory ends and relinquish individuality to preserve independence. They must kill in order to save. Yossarian’s desertion is justified because in the end there are no heroes or cowards, nor saints or sinners, there are only men, fighting for the most fundamental of human values, not for any idealistic notions of independence and patriotism, but for life itself. After all, survival is the one true heroic act of war. Drew McLaughlin
Religion in Catch-22
In times of war, soldiers may turn to their faith to cope with the horrors they see and the deaths of their closest brothers-in-arms. Catch-22 examines
Catch-22â•…â•… 543 this source of solace and also explores its limits. Not only do combat soldiers question their own faith, but they also doubt the proprietors of the faith sent to minister to the men. There’s an old saying, “There are no atheists in foxholes.” Atheists and the devout populate the island of Pianosa equally in Catch-22. Catch-22’s treatment of religion and faith is both comical and tragic. Yossarian is a devout atheist who believes in an incompetent creator. He attacks an entity he does not believe exists for allowing such cruelty and inhumanity in His finest creation, which is supposed to be reflective of Himself. Yossarian says to Lieutenant Scheisskopf ’s wife, an unbeliever as well, “What a colossal immortal blunderer! When you consider the opportunity and power He had to really do a job, and then look at the stupid, ugly little mess He made of it instead. His sheer incompetence is almost staggering.” She retorts that the God that she doesn’t believe in is merciful and kind. Faith and God provide no consolation to Yossarian, but rather an outlet to vent his frustration at the war, Cathcart, and Catch-22. He views God as part of the problem, not the solution, and his atheistic views are not altered by the end of the novel. The chaplain, of course, begins the novel as a believer. His spiritual decline begins as he sees the military bureaucracy led by Colonel Cathcart corrupt faith and exploit it for their personal advancement. At one point, Cathcart summons the chaplain and tells him he wants to start a prayer session before every mission not for any altruistic goal of consoling the men before they fly off to fight and perhaps die, but so they will bomb more effectively. Now, I want you to give a lot of thought to the kind of prayers we’re going to say. I don’t want anything heavy or sad. I’d like you to keep it light and snappy, something that will send the boys out feeling pretty good . . . Your job is to lead us in prayer, and from now on you’re going to lead us in prayer for a tighter bomb pattern before every mission. Is that clear? Cathcart seizes religion and faith as a weapon of war and manipulates the chaplain, a man of God
and peace, to support and direct the killing of men and women with divine consent. The chaplain’s faith begins to unravel as he sees how even pure faith can be corrupted, and he struggles to understand the inverted values of war, where killing is considered a virtue. The chaplain begins to questions if there is even a God, as Yossarian does, and if so, how could he ever be sure of His existence. He thinks, “Was there a true faith, or a life after death? With what matters did God occupy Himself in all the infinite aeons before the Creation.” The chaplain resents the alienation that accompanies his calling and his commission. The soldiers act and speak differently around him because he is the “chaplain,” and that isolation furthers his doubts. He begins to wonder if he wouldn’t have been better off enlisting in the infantry and taking his chances. He begins to doubt the foundations of the Christian faith, thinking, There was the Bible, of course, but the Bible was a book and so were Bleak House, Treasure Island, Ethan Frome, and The Last of the Mohicans. Did it indeed seem probable, as he had once overheard Dunbar ask, that the answers to the riddles of creation would be supplied by people too ignorant to understand the mechanics of rainfall? There were no miracles; prayers went unanswered, and misfortune tramped with equal brutality on the virtuous and the corrupt. The joy with which people like Milo and Cathcart inflict suffering with impunity and the way they exploit the war for profit and career ascent, pushes the chaplain to question everything he has come to believe and to serve. The destructive nature of war knows no boundaries. Human life, human sanity, a foundational faith in the kindness of humanity, and even institutionalized religion are not beyond the domain of the carnage—they are just casualties of war. Drew McLaughlin
Suffering in Catch-22
Death and suffering are constant and inescapable realities of war. Their specters haunt all soldiers and
544â•…â•… Heller, Joseph break many psychologically. It is common to all theaters of war in all times, from the jungles of Vietnam, the sands of Iraq, the mountains of Afghanistan, or 30,000 feet above Earth where John Yossarian, the hero of Catch-22, encounters death and suffering on a daily basis as a bombardier on a B-24. Yossarian and his squadron are stationed and imprisoned on the island of Pianosa, off the coast of Greece, by their certifiable commander and the simplistic lunacy of Catch-22. The catch is that any person who continues to fly bombing missions in the face of certain death is insane and as such entitled to be relieved of duty; however, any person who recognizes the truth of the situation and requests to be removed from flight status for that reason must be sane enough to fly. Catch-22 traps Yossarian and his squadron on interminable flight duty, unable to go home until they fly the requisite number of missions or they die trying. Yossarian comes to realize that the only avenue of escape is death because the squadron commander, Colonel Cathcart, always raises the total number of missions one has to fly as soon as someone nears the mark. Throughout the novel, Yossarian hatches a series of schemes to escape the brutal realities of war, but the suffering and death surround him, whether he is in the air, in the hospital, or in his bunk. Mudd, referred to throughout the novel as “the dead guy in Yossarian’s tent,” is killed on a mission before the military bureaucracy actually processed him as a member of the squadron, and he is never listed as having arrived. Mudd becomes an invisible man who is dead, but not declared dead, and no one in the unit retains the authority to remove his personal belongings from Yossarian’s tent. This is one of the constant reminders of death that Yossarian deals with in Catch-22. Yossarian constantly evades active duty by claiming to be ill. He spends days on end in the hospital with mysterious illnesses that the doctors cannot diagnose or treat. While lying in the hospital, Yossarian encounters the soldier in white, a man with no name and bandaged from head to toe. “The soldier in white was encased from head to toe in plaster and gauze. He had two useless legs and two useless arms.” The soldier in white dies and is replaced by another, although everyone in the hospital assumes
it is the same person, which signifies the perpetual, anonymous casualties that war inflicts. Yossarian witnesses other tragic events more directly in Catch-22. McWatt, a daredevil pilot who seldom follows orders, buzzes the beach as a stunt but accidentally flies too close and slices Kid Sampson in half with the propeller of his B-24. McWatt, consumed by guilt and regret, crashes his plane into the side of a mountain. Nately is a patriotic 19-yearold in love with a prostitute in Rome. He completes his required 70 missions but will not return home until he can bring his lover with him. Yossarian pleads with him in vain, but Nately volunteers to fly Milo Minderbender’s missions for him. Nately is killed on a bombing mission along with 12 other men. These tragic deaths contribute to Yossarian’s suffering, but Snowden’s death, by far, makes a more devastating imprint. Snowden’s death is a marker in the novel. Unable to forget and incapable of moving on, Yossarian recalls his death continually. The gory circumstances of Snowden’s death are gradually revealed as the story progresses. On a bombing raid against Avignon, Snowden is wounded by artillery flak, and Yossarian crawls into the tail of the plane to tend to his wounds. Yossarian consoles Snowden, who repeatedly cries out that he’s cold, as Yossarian dresses the gaping wound in Snowden’s leg. Yossarian assures Snowden that he will live until he notices blood trickling out from under Snowden’s bomber jacket. The narrator describes Snowden’s death: Yossarian ripped open the snaps of Snowden’s flak suit and heard himself scream wildly as Snowden’s insides slithered down to the floor in a soggy pile and just kept dripping out. A chunk of flak more than three inches big had shot into the other side just underneath the arm and blasted all the way through, drawing whole mottled quarts of Snowden along with it through the gigantic hole in his ribs it made as it blasted out. Yossarian screamed a second time and squeezed both hands over his eyes. His teeth were chattering in horror . . . Here was God’s plenty, all right, he thought bitterly as he stared—liver, lungs, kidneys, ribs,
A Farewell to Armsâ•…â•… 545 stomach, and bits of the stewed tomatoes Snowden had eaten that day for lunch. Snowden dies in Yossarian’s arms as he helplessly consoles Snowden in his final moments with the words, “there, there,” because that is all he can think to say. This grisly scene robs Yossarian of his courage, nearly captures his sanity, and finally forces him to see the fragility of life and the utter insanity of war. Snowden’s death propels Yossarian on his crusade of self-preservation at all costs. He ultimately escapes the clutches of Catch-22 by essentially quitting the war. He flees to neutral Sweden, because he will not sponsor Colonels Cathcart and Corn’s plan to saddle the squadron with 80 missions in exchange for his discharge. To save his life, his honor, and the respect of the squadron, he deserts. Suffering and death in war is often meaningless despite its great consequences; however, sometimes death can be redemptive. Snowden’s death galvanizes Yossarian and empowers him to save his own life. Drew McLaughlin
Hemingway, Ernestâ•… A Farewell to Armsâ•… (1929)
Written in 1929, A Farewell to Arms is the semiautobiographical story of an American, Lieutenant Frederic Henry, and his love affair with his British nurse, Catherine Barkley. Lieutenant Henry (often referred to in the novel as tenente, Italian for “lieutenant”) is an ambulance driver near the Italian-Austrian Front in World War I. He is injured in an Austrian mortar attack, and during his convalescence in Milan, he woos and becomes lovers with Catherine, a nurse transferred to Milan from the previous town where the two met. He returns to the front, where a retreat is sounded; due to a series of missteps and dangerous double-crossings, he deserts the Italian army. Surreptitiously collecting Catherine from her new post, they go to Switzerland together. Escaping the war, they wait out Catherine’s pregnancy; in childbirth, both she and the baby die. But the book is far more than just the elements of this plot.
Hemingway took his real-life experience as a 19-year-old ambulance driver in World War I, the injuries he sustained in a mortar attack, along with the extended hospitalization and physical therapy that followed, and a brief love affair with an older nurse, and turned these events into one of the great novels of the 20th century. A Farewell to Arms is, in part, about the adventures of Lieutenant Henry and his affairs in war-torn Europe, but it is also a personal exploration of the soldier, wanting to see action, adventure, and life but stuck in the violent, depressing, immoral, unanticipated realities of wartime. Hemingway captures the relationship between the man and the war in intimate, and often profound, ways as he risks the rejection of the glories of war for the more human, and possibly more tragic, intimacies of husband and father. Aaron Drucker
Nationalism in A Farewell to Arms
In A Farewell to Arms, Hemingway evokes a running commentary on nationalism through ridicule and omission. This may best be described as an antinationalistic impulse in the book, but one that never quite reaches the sense that nationalism is negative so much as it is not held in particularly high esteem. Lieutenant Henry represents, almost by definition, a problematic position. He is an American in the Italian army. Rather than defending his country, the rights of his men, the land of his birth, he is saving strangers as a kind of adventure and romance. His compatriots are Italian, and they fight to hold the line against Austrian incursion. Of one fellow soldier, Lieutenant Henry notes, “Gino was born a patriot, so he said things that separated us sometimes, but he was also a fine boy and I understood his being a patriot. He was born one.” Neither adhering to Americanism nor evolving an expatriate’s sense of Eurocentrism, Lieutenant Henry’s presence in the Italian army explicitly questions the value and ethics of nationalism. There is no compelling explanation for why Lieutenant Henry is in Italy fighting for the Allies. At the outset of the novel, the Americans have yet to enter World War I. It is not that Lieutenant Henry feels particularly obliged by conscience to fight against the Austrians and Germans. To be
546â•…â•… Hemingway, Ernest sure, he chose the side that opposed military expansion, but it all seems a grand adventure. Catherine Barkley asks him, “Why did you do it?” He claims not to know. Ms. Barkley, like his readers, should be skeptical. Nonetheless, his response is notable for its lack of rationale. He places himself in mortal danger, driving from the front lines of active battle back to hospitals and stations, through difficult (and sometimes impassible) terrain, under fire and exposed to the constant threat of injury or death. And yet he offers no reason for it. There is no history to dictate his dedication to this cause. His family is not recently immigrated. His home is neither affected nor in danger due to the war. There is no apparent need for his presence at the front. Yet he comes to Italy to seek out a position in the Italian army. Although nationalism can be hard to define, some would call it the (often) extreme dedication to patriotic feeling, principles, or efforts. Putting one’s life on the line for a national cause is the textbook instance. Austria and Germany are invading Italy, and Gino, Rinaldi, the priest, and the other officers are fighting for their homes. Their cause is personal and patriotic. They are passionate in their nationalism. Even nurse Barkley joined the war effort because her life and home are threatened (Britain is also at war with Germany). In the end, however, it is Lieutenant Henry’s story, and Hemingway’s choice of narrator dictates the polemic of the novel’s perspective. While Lieutenant Henry never explicitly takes a position on nationalism, it is clear from his attitude that he is not nationalistic but believes himself motivated by a higher calling. For Lieutenant Henry, nationalism, and its personal counterpoint of “patriotism,” is at best an excuse and at worst a compulsion. He finds the label useful only to withdraw funds against his grandfather’s goodwill. He poses the rhetorical question of whether or not his grandfather can morally send him to jail rather than give him the money. Clearly, however, such “sight drafts” are a manipulation of the nationalistic impulse of his grandfather. Though Lieutenant Henry may be doing the right thing in engaging in the war, his motive for using the patriotic sympathies of his family and friends is manipulative. Beyond the simple utility of nationalistic rhetoric, it holds little value for the lieutenant.
If nationalism is not used to better his own situation, it is the force by which otherwise peaceful men are conscripted and condemned. In a short conversation with an orderly at the convalescent hospital, Lieutenant Henry offers a compelling rationale for those who would make war versus those who would otherwise be peaceful: “But [those who make war] make them do it . . . And the ones who would not make war? Can they stop it?” The orderly responds, “They are not organized to stop things and when they get organized their leaders sell them out.” Nationalism leads to conscription, then. Perhaps there are better reasons than nationalism to fight and defend one’s home (family, heroism, masculinity to name a few), but invoking love of the land upon which you happen to be born is only rhetoric and propaganda. Aaron Drucker
Parenthood in A Farewell to Arms
At its end, World War I was the deadliest international conflict in history. It was called “The War to End All Wars.” The second half of the novel A Farewell to Arms chronicles the romance of Lieutenant Frederic Henry and nurse Catherine Barkley. The affair begins as such wartime romances do: a friendly meeting, growing closer, an injury, the recovery, and finally the passionate exchange. Catherine becomes pregnant with Lieutenant Henry’s child; after a series of unfortunate events, they decide to desert their posts in Italy, have their child, and move to America. Their son, the product of their passion in a time of fear and violence, is meant to grow and thrive in the aftermath of the decimation of Europe. But in the face of destruction, desertion, and isolation, life proves too difficult to sustain. In war, all life is stillborn. Joking as they make their escape, Lieutenant Henry assures Catherine, “Rowing in moderation is very good for the pregnant lady.” They cross into Switzerland to escape the war and begin their life as a family. At the onset of book 5, the reader rejoins the couple settling into a routine of lazy ease near Montreux. They have thwarted the deadly insanity of war. “We had a fine life,” Lieutenant Henry extols. “We lived through the months of January and February and the winter was very fine and we were very happy.” Throughout the last few chapters
A Farewell to Armsâ•…â•… 547 of the novel, however, there is an insistent insecurity about the promise of new life. Once labor begins, Lieutenant Henry is gripped by foreboding. “People don’t die in childbirth nowadays. That was what all husbands thought. Yes, but what if she should die? She won’t die. She’s just having a bad time.” Birth is the beginning, the first moment of life; the world is new and full of wonder. But for Lieutenant Henry, it is “the byproduct of good nights in Milan,” the last vestiges of a life marked by violence and pain. The nights themselves were aberrances, punctuated notes of joy and pleasure breaking the monotony, agony, and omnipresent fear. What was meant to be harmless fun becomes a lifetime commitment, no matter how much of a blessing it might be, and Lieutenant Henry is left powerless. Birth, for Lieutenant Henry, represents all that is outside of his control: Catherine, marriage, children, the future, life, and death. The relentless back and forth in his mind, the agitation that cannot be satisfied by simple satiation, and the separation between self and situation each manifest as a commentary on Lieutenant Henry’s inability to cope with a future that is entirely beyond his control. The story happens around him, is described by him, but never happens to him. Unlike the war, this is Catherine’s story as much as Lieutenant Henry’s, and this frustrates him. His anxiety is relieved after certain tragedy: The baby is stillborn, Catherine dies, and only Lieutenant Frederic Henry remains. Birth is the tragic reminder that happiness is beyond control. It is outside the self, coming from loved ones and bright futures and goodly promises. In the stillborn birth of his son, Lieutenant Henry recaptures his own life, his own days, and his own, solitary destiny. The reader should be reminded that the novel itself is a fictionalized account of Hemingway’s wartime adventures, including a romance with a mysterious nurse. The real-life drama ended rather prosaically, but in the reimagined world of the heroic Lieutenant Henry, Hemingway builds to a climax both tragic and philosophical. Both his son and Catherine die in childbirth, victims of circumstance (and possibly medical malpractice). But there is a definite ambivalence in Hemingway’s portrayal of birth. The closer to reality it comes, the further the prose seems to separate from the characters. Lieu-
tenant Henry’s descriptions become more abstracted from the moment. There is a palpable sense of distance between the narrator and his story. The first three-quarters of the novel show a very present Lieutenant Henry: aware, engaged, sporting. He is always in the moment. But as the lieutenant and his consort escape the wartime drama, it becomes a tale of minutiae. He spends a full chapter on the quality of his beard. The pacing is uneven. Time snaps forward in fits and starts, until the protracted birth sequence, during which Hemingway attempts to capture the anxiety of being in the other room. Life goes on behind closed doors. Drama and tragedy occur off-stage, as the reader waits with the audience for the action to unfold. This gives the anticipation of birth a quality of distance and paranoia that produces the sense of relief when Lieutenant Henry is informed that his child is stillborn and his lover will soon die. Instead of the shock of tragedy, Lieutenant Henry’s narration is saddened but distant; he is a victim unburdened of responsibility. He leaves the war with nothing but a gentle limp. The war promised him heroism, valor, machismo, a wife, and a child but delivered nothing. Its promise is stillborn. Aaron Drucker
Survival in A Farewell to Arms
“Survival” is the only word in a time of war. Hollywood has spent the past century glamorizing war: the challenges, the heroism, the victories. While recent renditions of war have made the effort to make the terror, demoralization, and violence more visceral to the modern audience, the narrative of the war hero-protagonist victorious against overwhelming obstacles is still the standard. A Farewell to Arms makes a different claim. For Lieutenant Henry and his fellow soldiers in the Italian army, World War I is neither heroic nor valorous. Men sit together and try to pass the time, with their world punctuated by violent, senseless attacks and counterattacks in order to gain, and then lose, a few hundred meters of hillside. These men might be fighting for country, honor, duty, or idealism, but ultimately they simply strive to survive the experience. Hemingway understands that survival requires a vision of the future and the confidence and desire that there will be a tomorrow.
548â•…â•… Hemingway, Ernest Hemingway casts survival in two basic frames: “life and death” and “day-to-day.” The story begins in a relatively pleasant village (Gorizia) close to the front lines, where active fighting is common. Henry, being an ambulance driver, needs to be near the front but far enough away that the field hospital to which he ferries the wounded will not be shelled. The town is usually quiet and days largely consist of idle conversation and some relatively innocent trash talk. Lieutenant Henry reports on conversations where the priest is often teased, his purity is set against a ribald desire for the good humor of the other men. Such idle back-and-forth allows the soldiers and civilian support to build a rapport, and it passes the time and becomes ritual in a world turned upside down. Ritual helps the men order the world, recast the day-to-day experiences and expectations from the mundane life of tailoring or farming into the mess hall as they come from the battlefield. Rituals like the mocking of the priest give order to the chaotic experience of the battlefield. When such rituals break down, so do the men. When Henry returns from his injuries, he quickly discovers that his compatriots are deeply demoralized. Upon his return, he is greeted with friendly conversations, but they tend toward the serious and philosophical. The men talk in quieter tones, one-on-one. Henry meets with the priest, then passes Rinaldi, then Gino jokes with him, but the puns fall flat. The officers have given up on their rituals and fallen despondent during Lieutenant Henry’s absence. Their desire to survive has almost completely eroded in the absence of sustaining routines. “There isn’t anything more,” the priest says. “Except victory. It may be worse.” Henry responds, “I don’t believe in victory anymore.” And the priest rejoins, “I don’t. But I don’t believe in defeat either. Though it may be better.” Defeat brings an end to the suffering, the doldrums of the day-to-day horror of war. Defeat brings death; victory means survival and more fighting. When survival is the object of dread, even the shepherd of the soul is lost to the nihilism of war. While Hemingway writes about the fragility of the social and religious coping mechanisms for survival, he does offer one consistent possibility for his protagonist (and thus his reader). Lieutenant Henry
is seriously injured in a mortar attack at the front. He is shuttled to the local hospital, then to a better hospital in Milan. It is not until Catherine joins him there that his survival is ensured. “God knows I had not wanted to fall in love with her. I had not wanted to fall in love with anyone. But God knows I had and I lay on the bed in the room of the hospital in Milan and all sorts of things went through my head but I felt wonderful and finally Miss Gage came in.” The doctor who would perform the successful surgery on his leg had arrived. Love, intentional or not, proffers the hope for survival. But Hemingway’s alternative to society, religion, and ritual is a bright, hot, and all-too-brief flame. All one can do is survive a war. There is no safety. No one leaves unscathed. The action of the novel breaks away from the fighting during a temporary retreat. Lieutenant Henry and Catherine diverge from the road their comrades follow only to discover that there is no safety in escape. They survive the war only to be confronted with the simple reality that everyone who is born dies. Ultimately the survival rate for all men is zero. Lieutenant Henry leaves the field alive. He is a survivor, but at the cost of everything, most especially hope in the promise of tomorrow. Hemingway leaves his protagonist and his reader without a future, merely alive. Survival: It may be worse. Aaron Drucker
Hemingway, Ernestâ•… The Old Man and the Seaâ•… (1952)
The Old Man and the Sea was first published in the September 1 issue of Life magazine in 1952. Two years later it was the only novel to receive explicit mention by the Swedish Academy when they awarded Hemingway the Nobel Prize for literature. Set in a Cuban fishing town, the short novel tells the story of an old man, Santiago, and his four-day-long, perilous, solo pursuit of a great fish. Santiago’s past is full of hardships, yet his bad luck has not made him weary of life. His body shows the traces of years of strenuous work, but his friendship with the boy, Manolin, and their talk of baseball, the lottery, and fishing reveal a persevering vibrancy in the old man. It is their close friendship
The Old Man and the Seaâ•…â•… 549 that seems to keep Santiago alive throughout the novel, even when he is alone in his skiff. The old man’s life also depends on the sea. This deep connection becomes literal when he hooks his great fish. If the old man shares a tempered optimism with the boy, he shares a wild desperation with the fish, as they pull each other through the Gulf Stream and toward death. When he returns to the island, both man and marlin have been torn to pieces. Still, Santiago, with the support of Manolin, has triumphed over the sea, loneliness, and even death. The Old Man and the Sea presents themes such as nature, isolation, and stages of life, in multifaceted and complex ways, making the simplicity of the novel’s plot and language as deceptive as the tranquil surface of the sea. Japhet Johnstone
Isolation in The Old Man and the Sea
Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea paints an ominous picture of isolation. The old man, Santiago, lives a solitary life in a shack, with a dilapidated skiff for his livelihood and one friend, the boy Manolin, to keep him company. His journey at sea isolates him even more, as he goes “beyond all people” in search of a great fish. Far out in his boat isolation also creeps into the old man’s dreams. However, The Old Man and the Sea does not create an image of total isolation. The old man is never completely alone, and the bleak images of isolation make his bonds of kinship with the world stand out all the brighter. The old man’s life on the island is isolated both socially and economically from the other fishermen and villagers. Foremost, he has no family. A photograph of his deceased wife serves as a reminder of this loss, but he keeps it under a clean shirt because the sight of the photograph makes him too lonely. Without a family the old man seems all the more lonesome in contrast to Manolin. The boy’s family dictates his behavior and influences his opinions. His family is a living part of his world, not something he can hide away. There is no such influence over the old man’s decision-making, except maybe a desire for economic ease. As a fisherman, he must catch fish to make a living. Since at the beginning of the story he has not caught a fish in 84 days, his
financial resources are lower than ever. He lights no fire at night. He would have little to eat if the boy did not bring him stew and rice. Moreover, his “bad luck” makes him an object of ridicule and pity in the village. In these abject conditions the old man has nobody except for the boy, and he even leaves him behind when he sets out to test his luck on his 85th day at sea. The old man isolates himself both physically and geographically on his three-day fishing expedition. He refuses to take the boy with him in his skiff. All alone, even with his strong but old body, he suffers from thirst, hunger, and fatigue. He regrets not having the boy with him multiple times during his voyage. Without the boy, drinking, eating, or recuperating lost fishing-line all become Herculean tasks for an old fisherman. With nobody by his side, the old man finds himself in a dangerous position, made more dangerous by his geographic isolation. On his first day he sails out to where only the tops of the island hills are visible; then when he hooks his big catch he is dragged out to where no land is visible at all. The old man reaches his most remote point when he kills the marlin and stops the fish from towing his boat farther out to sea. Without his only friend and far from help, the old man’s isolation nearly kills him. Isolation also haunts the old man’s dreams. When the old man finally allows himself to sleep during his second night at sea, he has three dreams. Between two dreams of companionship and pleasure is a dream of discomfort and cold. This harsh dream resembles the old man’s life on the island: a chilly, unpleasant night in a shack. The severity of this image contrasts with the two other dreams. The first dream is of a school of porpoises playing in the ocean during mating season. The other dream is of a lion that arrives on a beach alone and is then joined by others. In this dream sequence, the old man’s life of solitude appears all the more arduous juxtaposed with these pleasant visions of animal communities. Though for the old man community and belonging seem but a dream, he is never completely isolated. His poor outsider status on the island does not mean that no one cares for him. Certainly, this is most obvious in his relationship to the boy. But upon his return to the island, it is clear that the vil-
550â•…â•… Hemingway, Ernest lagers do worry about the old man. They sent the coast guard to search for him, and Manolin must tell the proprietor of the Terrace to prohibit any curious parties from disturbing the convalescent old man. Even far out at sea, the old man knows that he is not utterly alone. The kinship he feels toward the turtles, porpoises, wind, and stars is accompanied by his thought, “no man was ever alone on the sea.” From the old man’s point of view he is surrounded by his “brothers” of the air and of the water. Isolation thus becomes merely a question of perspective. Japhet Johnstone
Nature in The Old Man and the Sea
The central conflict in The Old Man and the Sea is between man and nature. The old man, Santiago, challenges nature when he sets out alone in his skiff to catch a great fish. At sea, he overcomes many trials thanks to his determination and sharp mind. These assets are quintessentially human and are the old man’s best weapons against the unpredictable and wild sea. The sea, and all of nature, can grant both good luck and bad. It is a source of fortune and beauty, and also a formidable enemy. But nature is not just the sea, the stars, the marlin, and the sharks; the old man is also a part of nature. His connection to nature is most evident in his own body and his relationship to the marlin. In the end, however, it is the old man, and not the marlin, who makes it back to shore alive. Even with no luck at all, Santiago’s resolution is strong enough to bring him back home alive, exhausted, and a hero. Nature has not been kind to the old man. His work as a fisherman has exposed him to nature’s cruelty. The sun has marked his skin with cancer. He knows firsthand the burning poison of jellyfish. When the novel begins Santiago has gone 84 days without catching a fish. On the 85th day he catches a 1,500-pound marlin. Nature rewards the old man with its bounty, but the size of its bounty is almost too much for a single fisherman. When the old man has finally lashed the marlin to his skiff, nature sends its minions: sharks, who devour most of the fish. Santiago meets all of nature’s trials with determination. His years at sea have taught him many “tricks” to counter nature’s whims. After almost
three months of bad luck, he still goes out to fish daily. While the taut, heavy lines cut across his back as Santiago waits for the marlin to surface, he reminds himself that his advantage over the fish is his intelligence and his unrelenting resolution. Indeed, Santiago does not cut the line. Even when black spots appear before his eyes and sharks attack through the night, he commands himself to keep a clear mind and does not relinquish his catch. Though nature is often cruel to the old man, he still loves it, especially the sea. Unlike some of the young, brash fishermen, who think of the sea as “el mar,” a hostile, masculine opponent, Santiago thinks of the sea as “la mar.” The sea is a woman, and Santiago feels that, like a woman, the sea is naturally wild. These things do not make him love the sea any less. He also has an affinity for nature’s creatures. He feels compassion for the fragile terns whose voices are so delicate. He reveres turtles and hawksbills for their elegance and porpoises for their playfulness. Even the sharks are beautiful to Santiago, though he hates them. Nothing in nature is without some quality that the old man can admire. The old man himself is one of nature’s creatures. If the mind is human, then the body is natural. The opening description of the old man compares his scars to erosion in a desert, and it is as if nature had written itself into the old man’s skin. The ebb and flow of luck, which is nature’s domain, influences his whole body. Bad luck strikes when his left hand cramps. Suddenly, he has no power over it. In the same way that the old man waits for the marlin to surface, so too must he wait for his hand to uncramp. But the old man’s link to nature is more than just his own physical body. Santiago’s most notable connection to nature is the marlin caught on his hook. At each end of the fishing line there is a figure who will not let go of its life. As the old man shortens the line, the spiritual distance between the two also shortens. The old man wonders about the marlin and feels sorry for him. He even wishes to be the fish at one point. Both fish and man parallel each other in endurance and strength. The marlin’s determination drags the old man far out to sea. The old man’s brings them back. And though the old man lives on, the parallel between the two is not broken by the marlin’s death
The Old Man and the Seaâ•…â•… 551 and mutilation. As the townspeople examine and measure the fish’s skeleton on the beach, they are also measuring the old man’s greatness. This greatness resides in his will power, which can face the sea and all of nature’s tricks, with or without luck. Japhet Johnstone
Stages of Life in The Old Man and the Sea
The Old Man and the Sea does not detail the stages of life in a progressive development from youth to adulthood to old age. Instead, the old man stands at the final stage of life, where death is a real threat, but also where experience has given him a wealth of knowledge. His friend, the boy, is just at the end of the first stage of life, yet he is already wise beyond his years. He lacks only experience and instruction, both of which he hopes to gain from the old man. The years between the old man and the boy do not distance them from one another. The long span of time is full of dreams and fantasies that the two share. The old man feels the effects of aging. Except for his eyes, which retain a cheerfulness and triumphant shine, everything about Santiago is old. When his eyes are closed he looks lifeless. His conversation with the boy turns frequently to the retelling of stories, but the old man is not senile. His awareness of aging is sharp. He recognizes that age is his alarm clock and wonders why old men wake up so early. Age has also provided him with experience, which in turn has taught the old man many tricks. In spite of his age and his fatigue, the old man battles the sharks that assault his skiff. The old man has a small armament to kill the sharks, but more than these material weapons, he is armed with his mind. And it is not old age that threatens his mind at sea, but starvation, dehydration, and exhaustion. Manolin represents youth and its benefits. He is capable and lucky. He can procure food for his old friend and help him with his fishing gear. The boy also works on a good fishing boat and regularly catches fish. These qualities contrast with Santiago’s stage of life. He often regrets not having the boy with him on his lonely skiff. If the boy were with Santiago, the fisherman would not only have an extra set of hands, but also, symbolically, have his youth to give him added vitality and endurance.
Still, youth alone would not be enough to subdue the giant fish. Even if the old man fondly thinks of the boy and nostalgically remembers his youth, it is the experience that has come with old age that helps him most. Between youth and old age lies the stage of life during which we gather experience. The old man has this period behind him, and yet keeps it fresh in his memories and dreams. It was a time of love, conquest, and travels for the old man. Some of these memories he returns to fondly, like his sailing to Africa and his arm wrestling triumphs. Other memories he does not welcome, like the memory of his wife. The clearest figure of adulthood however, is not in the old man’s past but in the newspapers. Joe DiMaggio is young and strong, and Santiago thinks about him as frequently as he thinks about the boy. The old man wonders how long DiMaggio would stay with a giant fish, and if his bone-spur would cause him much pain. But the old man does not wish DiMaggio, an adult, were accompanying him. He longs for Manolin and youth. Similarly, the boy does not wish to learn from anyone else but the old man. None of the other characters in the novel, real or imagined, can provide the boy with the instruction and companionship of the old man. Nor can they provide the old man with the devotion and admiration of the boy. By the end of the novel both Santiago and Manolin are on the verge of passing into their next stage of life. For Santiago the next stage of life is death. Though he does not die, his body is wrecked by his expedition. Death seems very near. For Manolin the next stage of life is adulthood. Indeed, the pains that the boy takes to care for the old man show responsibility and maturity. The boy casts off the last remnant of childhood, his obedience to his parents, when he decides to fish with the old man in spite of their orders not to. But more than his renunciation of his parents, the boy’s passage into adulthood is marked by his first hard lesson—the lesson of loss. More than the old man himself sees, the boy sees how close to death the old man came. The boy’s tears prematurely mourn the loss of Santiago, from whom the boy still wishes to learn “everything.” Japhet Johnstone
552â•…â•… Hemingway, Ernest
Hemingway, Ernestâ•… The Sun Also Risesâ•… (1926)
Ernest Hemingway’s first great novel, The Sun Also Rises, was published in 1926. It is the story of a group of American and British expatriates living in Paris after World War I, who struggle to find some meaning in their lives. It begins with a brief description of Robert Cohn, a Jewish writer who worries that he is “not really living.” It is narrated by Jake Barnes, an American whose war wounds have left him impotent. Jake is in love with the Lady Brett Ashley, a beautiful, charming, and promiscuous woman. Brett loves Jake as well, but his wound has left them unable to pursue their relationship. She is engaged to Mike Campbell, a bankrupt Scottish veteran. Brett has a brief affair with Robert, who is unable to let her go. The veteran Bill Gorton is, like the others, a heavy drinker. Book 1 of the novel introduces the characters, and highlights Jake and Brett’s unhappiness in their frustrated relationship. Book 2 details the group’s trip to Spain, beginning with Jake and Bill’s fishing trip. They meet Brett, Mike, and Robert in Pamplona for the bullfights. Brett falls in love with the bullfighter Pedro Romero. They enjoy the fiesta for a time, until Robert’s jealousy for Brett leads him to punch Jake and Mike, and to severely beat Pedro. Brett and Pedro go away together, but their relationship soon breaks down, and Brett sends for Jake to rescue her. The novel ends with the two lamenting their condition. It is a beautiful expression of alienation, futility, gender, love, and spirituality. James Ford
Alienation in The Sun Also Rises
A sense of alienation and estrangement is pervasive throughout The Sun Also Rises. Jake Barnes is alienated from himself and the world around him. He is alienated from his own body, particularly by the war wound that has left him impotent, unable to consummate his love for Lady Brett Ashley. He tries to explain to his friend Robert Cohn that “you can’t get away from yourself.” He says that people want only what they cannot have, a sign of the futility of human life and desire. Jake wants Brett to be with him, to run away with him, to live with him despite his wound. Neither can have what they
really want. There is a distance between Jake and everyone else, particularly his friends. He is aware of the emptiness around him, but he struggles to live with it. He says that he does not care what life is all about; “All I wanted to know was how to live in it.” His passion for fishing and for the bullfights gives a sense of meaning to his life, but they do not make it any easier for him to live with his separation from Brett. Cohn is also alienated from everyone around him. He talks about his sense that he’s “not really living,” but his attempts at really living ultimately cost him his only friend. He falls in love with Lady Brett Ashley, who after a brief affair wants nothing to do with him. Cohn is certain of his love for Brett and follows her constantly. First he surprises Brett and her fiancé, Mike, at San Sebastian, where Brett and Cohn had their affair. After being cast off by Brett, Cohn continues to follow her around “like a poor bloody steer.” Cohn refuses to believe that his love for Brett does not matter, even as Mike and Brett insist that they do not want him around. Cohn is alienated from those around him by the fact that he is Jewish, by his failure to have fought in the war, and by his naïve insistence that Brett must love him. When Brett turns her affections to the bullfighter Pedro Romero, Cohn finally faces the truth that she does not love him. He punches out Jake, Mike, and finally Romero, before deciding that everything is useless and leaving it all behind. Brett is perhaps the most alienated character in the novel. She loves Jake, but has a series of affairs with other men and is engaged to Mike. She says it is “hell on earth” to be in love. As Mike says, she “enjoys things” but is not happy. She sees a momentary happiness with Romero, but it quickly fades. She says she wanted Romero but decided that she “was bad for him.” Having sent Romero away, she calls on Jake to rescue her so that she can return to Mike. Brett and Jake are also both alienated from religion and from God. At one point Jake goes into the cathedral to pray, regretting that he’s such “a rotten Catholic.” His religion does not seem to make much difference to his life. Later he and Brett go to the chapel to pray, but it only makes her “damned nervous,” since it never does her any good. Jake says
The Sun Also Risesâ•…â•… 553 that he is “pretty religious,” but that hardly seems sincere given his own difficulties with church and prayer. After Brett’s rejection of Romero, it is her sense that she has done the right thing for Romero that is her consolation. It is, she says to Jake, “sort of what we have instead of God.” In the most explicit statement about their lack of religious and spiritual beliefs, Jake says that “some people have God,” to which Brett responds “He never worked very well with me.” The novel concludes with them drinking more wine, eating more food, and talking around their problems, until Brett finally voices her frustration that “we could have had such a damned good time together.” Jake’s answer—“Isn’t it pretty to think so?”—is the last word in the novel. It suggests that he knows that many of their problems would remain, even if they were together. It shows that he feels estranged even from the idea of their union, that perhaps he doubts whether anything could resolve their feelings of alienation. It seems unlikely that any of the major characters will ever feel at home in the world. James Ford
Futility in The Sun Also Rises
The theme of futility is present from the first words of The Sun Also Rises. The two epigraphs that open the novel speak to this sense of the uselessness of human life. Gertrude Stein’s comment that “You are a lost generation” is directed at those who suffered through World War I and its aftermath, but the feeling of being “lost” is one that recurs in every generation. The epigraph from Ecclesiastes (which is the source of the book’s title) makes this plain: “One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh.” In Ecclesiastes, human concerns are a “vanity,” a chasing after wind, and this is true throughout the novel as well. The first line introduces Robert Cohn as a Princeton boxing champion, but the narrator ( Jake) explains that such things do not impress him. This is an early indication of the larger insignificance of human accomplishments. This focus on Cohn is a curious beginning, for other characters (particularly Jake and Brett Ashley) will be as important in the novel, but early on the focus is on Cohn and Jake’s
relationship to him. Cohn is determined to travel, in part because of a novel that he takes too seriously. Jake is world-weary and tries to convince Cohn how futile traveling the world actually is: “All countries look just like the moving pictures.” In truth, what Cohn wants is a new life. “Don’t you ever get the feeling that all your life is going by and you’re not taking advantage of it?” Cohn asks, and Jake replies that he is “through worrying” about life, death, or anything else. Jake has decided that such worrying is futile. Cohn is searching for some larger significance in his life, but for Jake life is the same all over; “Why don’t you start living your life in Paris?” is his sensible response. The major characters in the novel are discontent whether in Paris or anywhere else. Bill says later that Vienna “seemed better than it was.” Brett says that “one’s an ass to leave Paris.” Yet they all leave Paris for the fiesta in Spain. Many of the things that might make life more enjoyable seem tired for Jake and his friends. Drinks, dancing, parties, and in general the night-life all get boring. Even love seems futile, in part because of Jake’s condition. Brett says “There isn’t any use my telling you I love you” because “talking’s all bilge.” Jake and Brett long to be together, but his warwound and her wanderings make a future together impossible. When asked why they don’t get married, Jake jokes that “We want to lead our own lives” and Brett explains that “We have our careers,” echoing and mocking common explanations for not settling down. Mike’s comment later is typical: “This is all awfully amusing, but it’s not too pleasant.” Jake and his friends enjoy many things, but they rarely are happy. Even their arguments (between Jake and Cohn first, then Cohn and Jake’s friend Harvey) amount to nothing. Most of all, human wisdom is futile in the novel. Jake realizes how pointless his own philosophy of life is, thinking that “in five years . . . it will seem just as silly as all the other philosophies I’ve had.” All things pass away, even as the world endures. This sense that human pursuits are ultimately futile receives fullest expression during the fiesta, where “it seemed as though nothing could have any consequences.” There are real consequences, though; for instance, the consequences of love affairs—Jake’s emptiness, Mike’s loneliness, Brett’s
554â•…â•… Hemingway, Ernest unhappiness, and Cohn’s violence. Brett knows that Cohn’s problem is that “he can’t believe it didn’t mean anything” when they were lovers, but to her it is meaningless. After Cohn knocks out his friends and beats Romero to a bloody pulp, he finally agrees that “everything” is pointless, saying “I guess it isn’t any use.” When a bystander is killed during the running of the bulls, a man who had a wife and two children, a waiter is left to express how senseless the death is. “All for sport, all for pleasure,” he says. Ironically, the only truly worthwhile activities are casual pursuits, like fishing with friends. Jake is happiest trout-fishing with his friend Bill, and enjoying a bottle of wine (or two) afterward. They find a kind of peace in friendship that is otherwise elusive. For Jake, traditional pursuits like prayer and religion seem empty in comparison. The novel ends with his rescue of Brett, but their relationship is another exercise in human futility. They are right back where they started, lost. James Ford
Gender in The Sun Also Rises
The Sun Also Rises raises many questions about what it means to be a man. The novel is narrated by Jake Barnes, a man left impotent by his war wounds. Most of the major characters are men, but they spend their time fighting and arguing over one woman, Brett Ashley (the novel’s only major female character). When Brett is first introduced in the novel, what is most prominent is how she differs from other women. She has a crowd of men around her and she is quite beautiful, with her “hair brushed back like a boy’s.” In fact, Jake explains, “she started all that.” Another fact that makes her different is her tendency to drink like a man. Count Mippipopolous, one of the many men smitten with Brett, says that she is “the only lady I have ever known who was as charming when she was drunk as when she was sober.” Her refusal to follow the rules of polite society often excludes her, such as when she cannot enter the church because she has no hat. Much has been made of Lady Ashley, and the significance of her character. Is she a liberating force, since she is in many ways the center of the novel and refuses to follow societal conventions? Or does she reinforce common prejudices, in that she
seems to be the cause of many of the problems in the novel and often is dependent on men? As Jake says of her, “she can’t go anywhere alone.” What is clear is that Brett Ashley is a compelling character, and the men of the novel orbit around her. For instance, at the fiesta she wants to dance with a crowd of men, but they keep her in the center of the circle: “they wanted her as an image to dance around.” This is symbolic of Brett’s relationships throughout the novel. She has a series of affairs, all the while loving Jake. Her final affair is with Pedro Romero, the young bullfighter who in many ways is a symbol of young, powerful manliness. That relationship fails (just as all her others do), in part because Pedro wants her to grow her hair out, to be “more womanly.” He insists on marriage, but Brett Ashley refuses to be bound by society’s expectations of a woman. Jake is far removed from the smooth confidence of Pedro Romero. His war wound shadows him throughout the novel, “the old grievance.” He is generally good-natured about his condition, but it prevents him from pursuing his relationship with Brett. They genuinely love each other. Whether or not Brett’s affairs are the result of his impotence is unclear, but it is certainly an important factor. As she says, “I couldn’t live quietly in the country. Not with my own true love.” Jake is patient with her, but his situation leaves him decidedly bitter about women in general, and Brett Ashley in particular. He muses that a man has “to be in love with a woman to have a basis of friendship,” before concluding “to hell with women, anyway.” That conclusion is half-hearted; the one thing Jake can never do is forget about Brett, or the wound that keeps them apart. One quality that seems indicative of manliness in the novel is aficion, the passion that some men (and only men) have for bullfighting. Jake has it, and it is his link to a secret world of men. The hotelkeeper Montoya is an aficionado, as is Pedro Romero. In fact, all the great bullfighters and lovers of the bullfights are aficionados, with a sort of spiritual bond linking them. When Brett’s affair with Pedro threatens to weaken his aficion, it is the one thing Montoya cannot forgive of Jake and his friends.
Hiroshimaâ•…â•… 555 Robert Cohn is a man who lacks that passion. In fact, the other men compare him to a steer, which is a young, castrated bull—the symbol of a lack of manliness. They laugh at him for the way in which he follows Brett, just as the steers hang around the bulls waiting for their attention. Ironically, Cohn is the most violent man in the novel, decking his friends and nearly killing Pedro Romero in his frustration at Brett’s rejection. Cohn’s traditional sense of pride and honor alienate him from the world around him, just as Jake’s impotence and Brett’s independence alienate them. Gender roles are another way that Hemingway’s characters are not at home in the world. James Ford
Hersey, Johnâ•… Hiroshimaâ•… (1946)
In the spring of 1946, Pulitzer Prize-winning author John Hersey flew to Japan to interview six survivors of the atom bomb that devastated Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. The New Yorker magazine published Hersey’s long article in August 1946; the article was later issued as a book, entitled Hiroshima. In 1985, Hersey returned to Japan to write a follow-up article on the six survivors. The New Yorker also published this piece, entitled “The Aftermath,” which was soon added to a revised edition of the book. Following World War II, many Americans felt intense hatred toward Japan. Hiroshima can be read, in part, as a response to that hatred. For example, some of Hersey’s readers were Christian, and his inclusion of a Japanese United Methodist minister and a German Jesuit priest among the profiled survivors allowed his readers to see that some differences between American and Japanese cultures, such as religion, were not as vast as believed at the time. The book also sympathetically details the plight of families. One example is a mother suffering from radiation sickness and poverty, who must provide for her three young children. Hersey’s journalism made it difficult for the American public to justify prejudice against its former enemies of war because the two cultures, although different, share basic human values and emotions. The atomic bomb dropped by the U.S. Army Air Force on Hiroshima killed approximately 100,000
Japanese plus foreign civilians and military personnel. Out of this tragedy, the book makes clear, arose tremendous suffering. But selfless acts of heroism kept the community together. People also survived by giving friends and strangers hope that Hiroshimans would heal and rebuild their lives. Elizabeth Cornell
Heroism in Hiroshima
Heroism is a bold act of courage. A hero often acts at the risk of his or her own life or well-being. Generally, a person is not conscious of acting heroically, nor does someone perform a heroic deed only to be recognized as a hero. John Hersey’s Hiroshima is filled with heroes and acts of heroism, large and small. For example, minutes after the bomb explodes over Hiroshima, Mrs. Hatsuyo Nakamura digs her children out of the rubble that was once their house. Her act of heroism is motivated by desperation, love, and maternal instinct. Mrs. Nakamura is a heroine because her effort to save the lives of her children is a selfless one. Hersey details other remarkable instances of selfless heroism like Mrs. Nakamura’s. Father Kleinsorge, who is “apathetic and dazed in the presence of the cumulative distress” caused by the destruction of Hiroshima, learns that the secretary of the diocese is trapped in the second floor window of the burning mission. Kleinsorge shakes himself out of his dazed state and runs into the flaming building. Mr. Fukai wants to remain in the house to die, but Kleinsorge refuses to honor his wish. With the help of a student, he drags Fukai downstairs and outdoors. Since Fukai refuses to walk, Kleinsorge hoists him on his back and they escape from the fire that soon devours everything in the neighborhood. But when Kleinsorge sits down to rest, Fukai runs away, back into the fire. He is never seen again. Sometimes heroic acts are unappreciated or even unwanted by the recipient. Rescuing people from life or death situations, as Kleinsorge did at the risk of his own life, are clear acts of heroism. But, as Hersey’s book shows, heroism is not always associated with high-risk situations. Moreover, heroic deeds do not necessarily have clear-cut beginnings and ends, and often continue for long periods of time. Mrs. Nakamura is
556â•…â•… Hersey, John a case in point. Widowed by the war, she is sole caretaker for her three children. She has few marketable skills. On top of that, Mrs. Nakamura suffers from serious radiation sickness. She manages to take in some sewing, as well as cleaning and laundering for neighbors, but “she got so tired that she had to take two days’ rest for every three days she worked. . . . She earned barely enough for food.” She struggles for many years. Her heroism lies in never giving up on herself and her family, despite lingering illness and the bleak conditions that plague her daily existence. Her tireless, selfless efforts pay off: Her children eventually become successful adults. When Mrs. Nakamura retires, she finally takes pleasure in living. Father Kleinsorge also selflessly gives to others, and does so for the rest of his life. We might say his life is one long, heroic act. Despite the radiation sickness that afflicts him, Kleinsorge serves his church faithfully and tirelessly. He conducts Mass, hears confession, teaches Bible classes, runs eightday retreats, visits survivors, and even babysits on occasion. Hersey explains that Kleinsorge takes “on himself the Japanese spirit of enryo—setting the self apart, putting the wishes of others first.” Kleinsorge’s colleagues think “he might literally kill himself with kindness to others.” Sometimes heroes receive medals for their courageous acts. Kleinsorge receives nothing but deep gratitude from everyone he touches until his final days, when some of his selfless service to others is paid back. When Kleinsorge is unable to take care of even his most basic needs, he receives loving and round-the-clock care from his helper, Yoshiki-san. Their relationship demonstrates a view of heroism described by Thomas Carlyle, a 19th-century Scottish philosopher. Carlyle wrote that heroes are “leaders of men”; they are “the modellers, patterns, and in a wide sense, creators, of whatsoever the general mass of men contrived to do or attain.” One implication of this passage is that common people admire heroism and may wish to emulate heroes. Kleinsorge, “a leader” of people, can be seen as a “modeller” who creates “patterns” of behavior for others to copy. Yoshiki-san’s selfless service to the dying Kleinsorge is an emulation of the selfless heroism the priest modeled throughout his life.
The bombing of Hiroshima was a terrible act against humans; but the outcome was not entirely negative. As the feats of heroism described above show, it takes more than a bomb—even a nuclear bomb—to break the human spirit, heroic or otherwise. Elizabeth Cornell
Hope in Hiroshima
A curtain of flames reflects in the night sky over bombed-out Hiroshima, and a girl rescued from a toxic river shivers. Father Kleinsorge, one of the six survivors profiled by John Hersey in Hiroshima, brings her a blanket. But she continues to shiver uncontrollably. The priest brings her another blanket. “I am so cold,” she says, “and then she suddenly stopped shivering and was dead.” The blanket offers the girl a hope of warmth and life, but her death makes the post-bomb scene feel hopeless indeed. The thousands of slimy, swollen, and discolored human bodies only add to the sense of hopelessness. Reverend Tanimoto, one of the uninjured few, keeps reminding himself that these people “↜‘are human beings.’↜” In the initial days after the American bombing of Hiroshima, hope feels like a luxury to the sick and dying crowds of people. One doctor is only willing to take care of the slightly wounded. He explains, “There is no hope for the heavily wounded. They will die. We can’t bother with them.” But glimmers of hope cut through the nightmare. A Japanese naval launch traverses the seven rivers of Hiroshima to announce the imminent arrival of a naval hospital ship. This gives the people cheer and hope. However, no ship arrives. False hope is common in the desperate days after the bombing, but sometimes even that kind of hope is useful. For example, at the Catholic International Hospital in Tokyo, a doctor presents an optimistic face to Father Kleinsorge, who is very sick. The doctor promises to send Kleinsorge home in two weeks; but privately, to the Mother Superior, he predicts that the priest—and all the “↜‘bomb people’↜”—will die. He holds little hope, but understands that giving this kind of false hope is the best medicine he can offer. Kleinsorge does survive, however, as do many “bomb people.” Perhaps Kleinsorge’s deep faith in God gives him hope for survival. Later, he
Hiroshimaâ•…â•… 557 shares this faith with Miss Sasaki, whose long stay at the Red Cross Hospital depresses her. Kleinsorge’s words give her hope that all is not lost. After his visit, Dr. Sasaki notices that “she seemed quickly to draw to physical strength” from Kleinsorge’s words; soon after she is discharged from the hospital. Since Miss Sasaki is not a Christian, Father Kleinsorge’s religion may seem, to her, like an unlikely resource for hope. But hope often comes from unexpected channels. An unlikely source for all the Hiroshimans comes from Japan’s now powerless leader, Emperor Showa. When he announces on the radio that Japan has surrendered to the Allies, thus ending the war, Mrs. Nakamura, like most Japanese citizens, is stunned. The common people have never heard his voice before. They consider their emperor to be more than human: He is a sacred symbol and the embodiment of Japan. The emperor’s message uplifts the disheartened Japanese and gives them hope for their country’s future. Tanimoto later explains in a letter to an American friend that people believe that to surrender is to make a “whole-hearted sacrifice for the everlasting peace of the world”: hope, in other words, for a better future. With this hope for a better world, the Hiroshimans almost immediately begin to rebuild their city. Dr. Fujii, whose entire medical clinic fell into a river during the bombing, builds a new clinic. It becomes more successful than his original one. Kleinsorge rebuilds his mission and Tanimoto rebuilds his church. Rebuilding is an important way for the survivors to maintain the hope that all was not lost on August 6, 1945. Medical clinics and churches are among the institutions that provide some of the necessary infrastructure and hope the community needs to move on from the tragedy. By rebuilding their city, the Hiroshimans show faith in their future. They also hope for a future in which peace reigns. Many survivors want to use their experiences to promote peace. But peace is more easily visualized than achieved. Tanimoto works toward establishing a center for world peace. He receives support from organizations in the United States, but encounters resistance in Hiroshima. Moreover, although the destruction caused by the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki should be enough impetus for countries to stop manufactur-
ing bombs, such is not the case, as Hersey makes clear. Scattered throughout “The Aftermath” are italicized sentences indicating when another country acquires the knowledge to develop a bomb. The resistance Tanimoto encounters for his peace center and against the continued development of bombs is not an indication that the peace movement is failing, however. They are indications that the struggle for world peace is complex and difficult. Hope and activity for peace must not be abandoned but constantly renewed with increased vigor and awareness. Elizabeth Cornell
Suffering in Hiroshima
John Hersey’s book, Hiroshima, describes the human suffering caused by the atomic bomb, through details that may otherwise have been lost to history. The six survivors profiled in the book all have suffering in common but, as Hersey movingly shows, each experience of suffering is unique. For example, most who survive the bombing suffer immediate and severe injuries. But the Reverend Mr. Kiyoshi Tanimoto is not injured; his suffering stems from the guilt of not being injured and seeing the deep suffering that surrounds him. “Excuse me for having no burden like yours” he pleads to the burned and lacerated people he passes as he makes his way into the recently shocked and bomb-blasted city. The human suffering is on a scale unlike anything he has ever encountered. Tanimoto sees people whose burnt skin bears the shapes of the flowers printed on their kimonos. When he assists a woman onto a rescue boat, the skin falls off her hand in “glovelike pieces.” The wounded and dying grieve him so much that when, by pure chance, he finally encounters his missing wife and son, “Tanimoto was now so emotionally worn out that nothing could surprise him” and he does not even embrace them. Miss Toshinki Sasaki, an office clerk, does suffer physical injury. In the attack, a ceiling beam and a heavy shelf of books land on her. Her left leg is twisted and broken. After being rescued many hours later, she is taken outside and given shelter from the rain underneath a large sheet of corrugated iron. She suffers in this bare space for over two days with a “woman with a whole breast sheared off and
558â•…â•… Hesse, Hermann a man whose face was all raw from a burn.” After a while, these people start to smell, but Sasaki—whose leg becomes “swollen and putrid”—is too injured to move away from them. She is at last rescued by friends, who bring news that Sasaki’s parents and baby brother are dead, adding more emotional suffering to her ordeal. Doctors at the Red Cross Hospital manage to save her leg, but she is permanently disabled. Outside medical assistance is slow to arrive in Hiroshima. Only six doctors at the Red Cross Hospital can work, including Dr. Terfumi Sasaki (unrelated to Miss Sasaki). Nurses and medical supplies are scarce. In the dreadful days that follow the bombing, 10,000 injured people make their way to the 600-bed hospital. Confronted with so much suffering, Dr. Sasaki becomes robot-like, “mechanically wiping, daubing, winding, wiping, daubing, winding” the bomb victims. He secretly rests after 19 hours of treating raw flesh and dangling limbs. But an hour later, the wounded find him and chide him for not doing his job. In total, Sasaki works three straight days with one hour of rest. The suffering—his own and everyone else’s—is a nightmare he will long remember. In the years following the attack, the immediate suffering subsides. But the survivors continue to encounter new forms of suffering they never imagined possible. Miss Sasaki’s fiancé, who was not in Hiroshima during the bombing, abandons her because she is crippled. Like most survivors, Sasaki also suffers from radiation sickness as well as social and economic ostracism. These people are called hibakusha, meaning “explosion-affected person.” Non-hibakusha often scorn hibakusha and believe hibakusha can cause disease and bear deformed offspring. On a bright note, the hibakusha receive special health services and monthly allowances if they are unable to work. Moreover, thanks to Reverend Tanimoto, some female hibakusha with facial deformities (keloids) are selected to travel to the United States for plastic surgery. One hibakusha dies from the procedure, but the rest— now dubbed Maidens—are remarkably improved. Unfortunately, when they return to Japan, they become “not only objects of public curiosity but also of envy and spite.”
Despite this negative response to the Maidens, what is remarkable are the relatively few instances in the book when people complain about their suffering or condemn the Americans for causing it. The Reverend Tanimoto comments in a letter to an American friend that he “never heard anyone cried [sic] in the disorder, even though they suffered in great agony. They died in silence, with no grudge, setting their teeth to bear it. All for the country.” His observation does not mean that no one in Hiroshima complained or condemned the Americans for destroying a beautiful city. It may, however, cause readers to question their preconceived notions of what suffering is and their public and private responses to it. Elizabeth Cornell
Hesse, Hermannâ•… Siddharthaâ•… (1922)
Hermann Hesse (1877–1962) began writing Siddhartha in 1919 and it was first published in 1922. His life and numerous works, including this novel, were influenced by his parents, who both lived in India before meeting in Germany, as well as by a trip he took to Southeast Asia in 1911. Based on the dates that the Buddha is thought to have lived, this story takes place from approximately 540 to 480 b.c. Siddhartha leaves his family as a young man with his childhood friend, Govinda, because they are in search of enlightenment. Both decide to become samanas (wandering ascetic monks), and during this time they hear about Gotama, who is said to be the Buddha. Govinda decides to follow Gotama’s teachings, while Siddhartha continues his journey and reenters the world. He subsequently meets Kamala, a courtesan, and through her Kamaswami, a wealthy merchant, both of whom teach Siddhartha their trades. Feeling unhappy and unfulfilled after becoming a gambler, Siddhartha employs the ferryman Vasudeva, with whom he remains. After many years he sees Kamala, who dies from a snake bite shortly thereafter, and he discovers that she has given him a son. Siddhartha tries to raise his son, but quickly realizes that the son too must leave his father and go out on his own. In the final chapter Siddhartha once again sees Govinda; through a kiss on Siddhartha’s
Siddharthaâ•…â•… 559 forehead, Govinda is able to find the oneness and peace that Siddhartha has already achieved, within himself and with his surroundings. Christine Rinne
Individual and Society in Siddhartha
Siddhartha grows up with his family, in a Brahman community, and he must venture out of its confines in order to obtain the wisdom he seeks. He initially believes that withdrawal and social seclusion will offer the solution, then tries living in a large, diverse society, but he comes to learn that moderation leads to his happiness. Siddhartha encounters many types of people throughout his lengthy journey for peace, and he uses these experiences and interactions to decide how and where to spend the remainder of his life. It is only later in life, while living with Vasudeva, that he is able to achieve a balance between these two communal extremes, to understand himself and his environs better, and successfully to conclude his quest. As a young man Siddhartha decides that he must leave his parents and friends to be happy, and he thinks that he can best achieve this in isolation. He and Govinda renounce material possessions and live secludedly as monks for three years. However, Siddhartha concludes that he must actively experience what he is being taught in order to truly learn and attain wisdom. After seeing Kamala, he decides to reenter society so that she can teach him about the art of love. Though he does well as a merchant, which allows him to meet Kamala’s material demands, he does not always follow his mentor Kamaswami’s advice; Siddhartha is concerned about more than simply making a profit. Instead, he uses these opportunities to get to know the people whom he encounters, to learn about their motivations, values, and beliefs. Through this process he identifies qualities that he finds both helpful and harmful, in others and himself. After becoming a gambler Siddhartha has what he labels an empty life, until he has a dream about a dead caged bird. It inspires him to abandon this lifestyle as well and once more seek meaning. He briefly considers committing suicide because he cannot find solace or enticement anywhere or in anything or anyone, but he is halted by the sacred om, which again evokes tranquillity and serenity in him.
Once Siddhartha experiences both extremes, full withdrawal from as well as complete submersion in society, he is able to find a medium, a place where he interacts with those around him, yet also has the solitude he enjoys. After sleeping by the river Siddhartha sees Govinda, by whom he is reminded that his inability to love has made him ill. Thus when Siddhartha encounters Vasudeva, he accepts his friend’s offer and stays with him. He lives and works with the wise man, and it is here that Siddhartha is able to achieve some balance. He learns a new trade and has contact with those who employ his services, but he is not diverted by the negative aspects that had temporarily amused, yet also distracted him previously. It is also during this period that Siddhartha discovers he is a father and tries to establish his own family. His son, however, is unwilling to adapt to a simpler lifestyle, and Siddhartha, like his own father, must learn to let the boy go. Because of Vasudeva’s beneficial influence, Siddhartha learns to listen to the river as Vasudeva does and heed its guidance. Once while looking into the water he sees the faces of all who are dear to him: his father, himself, his son, Govinda, and Kamala. Their images and voices unite and he finally achieves oneness. He is also able to pass on this treasure, which he is able to achieve largely because of the lessons he learns from Vasudeva, to Govinda. Although Siddhartha loses many people who are important in his life and development, including Vasudeva, Kamala, and his son, their influence permits him to achieve contentment after decades of longing and searching. The story concludes with Siddhartha aiding Govinda to also obtain oneness, and the reader is not explicitly told what comes of these two friends, whose paths have yet again crossed. However, they have both finally achieved what they spent their lives in search of: peace with themselves and their surroundings. Siddhartha’s path was long and diverse, and included numerous types of societies. It is because of what he learns from each experience that he is finally able to achieve wisdom and happiness. Siddhartha has to find a balance between himself and his surroundings, and learn moderation and acceptance. Christine Rinne
560â•…â•… Hesse, Hermann
Love in Siddhartha
Siddhartha experiences and learns to recognize the value and necessity of love from three groups of people in this novel: his family, his friends, and his lover. To achieve his goal of oneness, Siddhartha lives according to different sets of values and beliefs, and he comes to realize that many people play an important role in his life and are essential to his ultimate happiness. Without loving and being loved he feels alone and dissatisfied, but when he loves, admires, and respects the things and people around him, he is able to achieve peace. When the story begins Siddhartha is a child and everyone loves him. Though he gives joy and pleasure to others, he is not content. Thus when he is a young man, he fears that his parents’ love and that of his friend Govinda will not be enough to satisfy him. Because Siddhartha’s father loves him and recognizes that he truly desires to become a monk, he permits Siddhartha to leave the family and join the samanas. Years later, when Siddhartha has a son of his own, he better understands his own father’s reluctance. Kamala spoiled their son and the son does not adjust well to his father’s simple lifestyle. Siddhartha consequently struggles with his son’s choices and must learn to grant him independence. Vasudeva helps Siddhartha realize that he is smothering his son with love, through his kindness and patience, and that he too must permit him to experience the world firsthand. After Siddhartha and Govinda part, they remain friends and their paths cross twice again. Both times Govinda does not recognize him, but Siddhartha immediately knows that the man is his childhood companion. The first occasion is after he has stopped gambling and is contemplating how to proceed. Govinda sees him and is worried about a man sleeping in the dangerous forest by himself. While they talk Siddhartha realizes how much he loves Govinda and that it was his own inability to love that had made him so ill. Their second encounter takes place at the end of the story, while he is working with Vasudeva. Govinda hears about the ferryman, who is rumored to be a sage, and he goes to see him with the hope that Vasudeva will be able to still his restlessness. When Siddhartha reveals who he is, Govinda asks him to share any realiza-
tions he has had. Siddhartha tells him that it is most important to love the world, and though Govinda is skeptical, he obeys Siddhartha’s final command to kiss his forehead. Through this act, which was driven by love, Govinda is also able to achieve the oneness for which he had been searching. Vasudeva becomes an important friend to Siddhartha while on his quest. Their first encounter is brief and takes place after he has left the samanas. He crosses the river but is unable to pay, because these monks do not have material possessions, so Vasudeva asks for his friendship as compensation. After leaving Kamala, more than 20 years later he again crosses the river there. Siddhartha stays with Vasudeva and also takes up his occupation. Here he is finally able to achieve oneness, by learning to listen from Vasudeva and the river. Vasudeva has a successful method to teach Siddhartha what he has been searching for, including how to love others. When Siddhartha sees Kamala for the first time, he decides that he wants to learn the art of love from her. Though numerous women are attracted to Siddhartha and he is attracted to many, Siddhartha had not yet been in love or had a sexual experience. This changes when he observes Kamala and consequently asks her to be his lover. Through his time with her, he learns that though love can be won, bought, received, or found, it cannot be stolen as he initially threatens; love must be reciprocated if it is to be enjoyed. Although Siddhartha is not aware of it when he departs, Kamala is pregnant and their child will later permit him to experience the joys and pains of a different kind of love. Siddhartha spends much of his life on a pursuit for wisdom and peace. Though he is loved as a child, he must learn to recognize, value, and reciprocate these feelings. Through his family, his friends, and his lover, many of whom he repeatedly encounters as he grows, Siddhartha comes to acknowledge the importance of each in his life, and their contribution to his wholeness. Christine Rinne
Spirituality in Siddhartha
The novel follows the main character, Siddhartha, on his quest to achieve peace and oneness. During this process he discovers that he must experience
Steppenwolfâ•…â•… 561 life for himself, instead of following someone else’s experiences and teachings, in order to develop and define his own values and ultimately obtain happiness. Over the course of this journey he learns the ways of priests, monks, merchants, and gamblers, but only with Vasudeva does he finally realize his goal. Though Siddhartha does not formally dedicate his life to religion, he is able to find a place and method for practicing his spiritual beliefs that are appropriate and gratifying for him. During each phase of Siddhartha’s journey he learns something about himself and his surroundings that allows him to eventually define his own spirituality. Siddhartha is the son of a Brahman, a Hindu priest and scholar, and while growing up he takes part in the priests’ conversations and religious observations. For example uttering the om, which begins and ends every Brahman prayer, is a practice that remains central throughout his life. However, he becomes frustrated when the priests do not teach him how to reach his innermost self and soul (atman). This dissatisfaction leads him to join the samanas, from whom he hopes to learn how to be empty of all desires, because the passion of these solitary outsiders left an impression on him as a child. Siddhartha and Govinda fast, renounce material belongings, and practice self-denial as monks, but Siddhartha again grows disenchanted after mastering these practices. He feels that many types of people, even alcoholics, could have taught him how to leave his body. He is certain that samanas will never achieve the ultimate goal of nirvana (death without rebirth) through this method. After listening to Gotama, who is said to be the Buddha, Govinda decides to follow his teachings. Siddhartha, however, finds a flaw in his doctrine, namely that he does not tell others how he has achieved salvation. Siddhartha concludes that true knowledge and salvation can never be taught by a teacher, but can be achieved only through personal experience. Siddhartha consequently decides to reenter society with the goal of experiencing what he has heard about firsthand. While wandering he sees the courtesan Kamala, and he is immediately drawn to her. Though he has been attracted to other women, he decides that he would like to learn the art of love from her. In order to meet her material demands
Siddhartha learns about commerce from Kamaswami. Siddhartha masters these skills and also learns from his customers, who help him define what attributes he finds positive and negative. After attaining monetary wealth he becomes a gambler, but he still does not feel satisfied. Siddhartha again withdraws from society and briefly considers suicide, but he realizes that it would not aid him in achieving his goal either. When he sees Govinda, he is reminded that he needs to love and be loved again, thus Siddhartha accepts Vasudeva’s offer and stays with him. Vasudeva is a wonderful listener, and through this practice he has been able to attain enlightenment, an achievement he is able eventually to pass on to Siddhartha. It is during this time that Siddhartha sees Kamala again and meets his son. After her death he tries to rear his son, but the boy does not adjust well to his father’s simple lifestyle and runs away. Vasudeva counsels Siddhartha and eventually he is able to let him go. Consequently Siddhartha realizes that what he has been searching for is the wisdom of how to feel and absorb oneness. One day while Siddhartha is in the woods he hears the river laughing, his final step toward peace. When he comes closer he begins to see many faces and hear many voices, but they blend together and he is enlightened. In the final scene Siddhartha imparts his realization to Govinda, something he had hoped many would do for him. Siddhartha must undertake a lengthy journey to find the spiritual oneness he desires. By living according to different sets of rules he is able ultimately to reach his goal and find a method that is suitable for him to practice his beliefs. Combining the lessons he learns at each stage in his quest, he discovers how much he can learn from his surroundings, and accept and appreciate those around him. Though he is not formally a religious leader, he is able to take what he learns as a student and convey it to Govinda. Christine Rinne
Hesse, Hermannâ•… Steppenwolfâ•… (1927)
Hermann Hesse’s Steppenwolf, which has been called his most popular, most innovative, most influential,
562â•…â•… Hesse, Hermann and most controversial work, grew out of a personal and artistic crisis. Just before Hesse started composing the novel, his short-lived second marriage to mentally unbalanced Ruth Wenger collapsed, his health deteriorated, and, approaching his 50th birthday, he suffered a severe midlife crisis. In addition, a writer’s block that had been precipitated by the revelation of his nom de plume, “Emil Sinclair,” kept Hesse from completing his Indian novel, Siddhartha (1922). In order to overcome this crisis Hesse underwent psychoanalysis, meeting with Dr. Josef B. Lang, one of Carl Gustav Jung’s disciples, numerous times. Hesse also wrote a cycle of poems, entitled Krisis (1928), which served as a palliative and which is closely linked with Steppenwolf. One of the poems, entitled “Steppenwolf,” eventually became part of the novel, with Harry Haller as its fictional author. Considering the novel’s genesis, it is not surprising that it is Hesse’s most autobiographical work. The book’s protagonist shares his initials with the author and many of the locations and characters are based on those known by Hesse. Harry Haller’s existential crisis and his attempts at anesthetizing his pain by drowning it in alcohol, drugs, and sex mirror Hesse’s life between 1924 and 1926. It was the use of drugs depicted in the novel that caused Timothy Leary in the 1960s to recommend Steppenwolf to his followers as preparation for an LSD trip. Moreover, the riveting depiction of the protagonist as an outsider who despises war and technology and who rejects middle-class values, struck a chord with large parts of the American youth in the 1960s and the book became a best seller in the United States. Karl Stegner
Alienation in Steppenwolf
The title of Hesse’s novel alludes to the protagonist’s role as outsider, his alienation from middleclass society. Before we learn his real name, Harry Haller, he is introduced by the (fictional) editor of his writings as “a real wolf of the Steppes, as strange, wild, shy-very shy-being from another world” who is extremely unsociable and who gives off a foreign and hostile air. To the editor, whose aunt takes the stranger in as a lodger and who is a representative of bourgeois values, proud of leading “a narrow, middle-class life, but a solid one, filled with duties”
(20), the Steppenwolf ’s slovenly, irregular, and irresponsible way of life, which does not seem to serve a practical purpose, is an affront. The editor, an avowed abstainer from alcohol and a nonsmoker, is especially displeased by the Steppenwolf ’s numerous wine bottles and the ever-present stumps and ash of cigars, which he discovers while spying on the lodger. A stickler for rules and regulations, the editor balks at the Steppenwolf ’s request not to inform the police of his residence, as stipulated by law. Even though Haller gives poor health as a pretext for his request, his alienation from society, in particular from the bureaucratic constraints of the state, is the true reason for his breach of existing law. Although the Steppenwolf leads a bohemian life which stands in stark contrast to the editor’s sense of duty and purpose, the outsider is attracted to middle-class orderliness to a certain degree. When the editor returns home one evening, he finds the Steppenwolf admiring two plants at the entrance of a flat. For Haller the spotlessly clean plants are “the very essence of bourgeois cleanliness, of neatness and meticulousness, of duty and devotion shown in little things.” While he declares that he does not laugh at bourgeois life, because it reminds him of his childhood, the Steppenwolf is painfully aware that he is estranged from that world and that it is lost to him forever: “I live a bit to one side, on the edge of things.” After an initially negative view of the lone wolf, the editor eventually feels sympathy “for one who had suffered so long and deeply.” When the Steppenwolf suddenly disappears, he leaves only a manuscript behind along with the statement that the editor may do with it as he pleases. Because the editor regards the manuscript as a document of “the sickness of the times themselves,” he decides to publish it with a caveat to the reader that he considers it for the most part fictitious: He believes that the Steppenwolf has attempted to give deeply lived spiritual events the form of tangible experiences. Having experienced the Steppenwolf from a primarily exterior perspective, the reader is next confronted with a firsthand, interior view of the outsider’s sufferings in “Harry Haller’s Records,” which bear the caution “For Madmen Only.” It is significant that Verrückte, the German word for
Steppenwolfâ•…â•… 563 madman, implies displacement and derangement, stressing yet again the Steppenwolf ’s outsider position. Haller’s alienation from middle-class values becomes only too evident when he is invited to the home of a conservative professor. The evening turns into a disaster when the professor unwittingly calls Haller a “bad fellow and a rotten patriot” and when the Steppenwolf insults his hostess by criticizing her favorite portrait of the classical writer Goethe for its sentimentality. For Haller the disagreeable soirée represents his ultimate break with the bourgeois world: “It was my leave-taking from the respectable, moral and learned world, and a complete triumph for the Steppenwolf.” The image of the Steppenwolf gains another dimension in Haller’s writings. It signifies not only his outsider role but also his untamed, animalistic nature, which is in constant conflict with his intellectual, civilized side. This strife between nature and spirit, which frequently brings Haller to the brink of suicide, is expanded upon in the “Treatise on the Steppenwolf,” a detached analysis of his dilemma, which he receives from a mysterious stranger. It not only stresses that Harry consists of a hundred or a thousand selves, not merely two, it also offers humor as the solution. As recommended by the treatise, Haller now commences the “wild zigzag trail” of exploring those elements of his psyche that he has suppressed. This quest, during which he is assisted by several characters from the margins of society, culminates in the Magic Theater, in which he explores such suppressed facets as sexuality and violence. Thus, even though Haller’s alienation from the middle class is exacerbated, the alienation within him is slightly ameliorated. Karl Stegner
Sex/Sensuality/Eroticism in Steppenwolf
One sign of Harry Haller’s alienation is his lack of an intimate relationship and his suppression of sexual feelings. The collapse of his marriage to a mentally unbalanced woman, along with Harry’s loss of profession and livelihood, constitutes the reason for his withdrawal from society: “Love and confidence had changed of a sudden to hate and deadly enmity. . . . It was then that my solitude had its beginning.” The subsequent relationship with his lover Erika is fraught with conflict and is
based on desperation rather than love. They see each other only intermittently and each meeting leads to quarrels. Harry concedes that “since both of us were lonely, difficult people related somehow to one another in soul, and sickness of soul, there was a link between us that held in spite of all.” One evening, when Harry is close to committing suicide, he meets Hermine, “a pale and pretty girl” who wears a withered camellia in her hair and who reminds him of his former sweetheart, Rosa Kreisler, and of Hermann, a boyhood friend. The flower is symbolic for Hermine’s being a courtesan who is financially supported by several men in exchange for sexual favors. Hermine, however, does not see Harry as a prospective customer but rather as a lost soul who needs to be taught the pleasures of life. She takes on the role of a mother by calling Harry a silly baby who needs someone to look after him. In order to loosen Harry up and to free him from his inhibitions, Hermine teaches him to dance the fox-trot. Soon Harry’s feelings of depression lift and he glimpses a ray of hope: “She was the one window, the one tiny crack of light in my black hole of dread. She was my release and my way to freedom. She had to teach me to live or teach me to die.” Hermine introduces Harry to Maria, another courtesan, and to Pablo, an exotic, bisexual musician who talks him into experimenting with drugs. Since Hermine represents the female component of Harry’s personality, or, in Jungian terms, his anima, he cannot be intimate with her. Hermine states: “I am a kind of looking glass for you, because there’s something in me that answers you and understands you” and Harry concedes: “You’re my opposite. You have all that I lack.” When he finds Maria in his bed as a gift from Hermine, Harry is at first hampered by bourgeois hang-ups: he worries about what his landlady might think. Eventually, however, he learns to enjoy the sensual pleasures the experienced courtesan has to offer: “She taught me the charming play and delight of the senses, but she gave me, also, new understanding, new insight, new love.” Harry enters into a sexual liaison with Maria, renting a room specifically for their frequent assignations. Surprisingly, he is not bothered by the fact that he has to share Maria with other men who are paying for her favors. A further indication that Harry is shedding
564â•…â•… Hesse, Hermann his middle-class inhibitions and prejudices is the fact that his uptight view of bisexuality and homosexuality gradually loosens. Even though he initially rejects Pablo’s offer of a threesome with Maria, Harry is not repulsed when Pablo kisses him on the eyelids: “I took the kiss as though I believed it came from Maria, but I knew very well it came from him.” Eventually Harry accepts his bisexual tendencies when in the Magic Theater a young, elegant fellow, who represents one facet of Harry’s personality, leaps laughing into Pablo’s arms, embraces him, and goes off with him. When Harry enters a room, which promises “all girls are yours,” he not only relives all the love affairs of his youth, rectifying all the mistakes and omissions he made as a young man, he also accepts Pablo’s invitation to “fantastic games for three and four.” This experimentation does not leave him conflicted, but rather calm, wise, and expert. In the Magic Theater Harry also encounters Hermine dressed up as his boyhood friend Hermann and falls under her hermaphroditic spell. Even though Harry has come far, he still has far to go. This is revealed when he finds Hermine and Pablo in deep sleep after a bout of lovemaking and stabs her with an imaginary knife in a fit of jealousy. When Mozart, one of the Immortals, stresses that Harry must learn not to take life too seriously, Harry agrees that he still has much to learn: “One day I would be a better hand at the game. One day I would learn how to laugh.” Karl Stegner
Violence in Steppenwolf
Harry Haller’s exploration of his violent impulses follows a similar trajectory as that of his sexual and erotic urges. At the beginning of the novel he is strongly opposed to any form of violence and aggression. He is a pacifist who is vilified in newspaper editorials as “a noxious insect and a man who disowned his native land” because he opposes preparations for an impending war, which he predicts will be a good deal more horrible than the last. Harry’s violent impulses are turned against himself, and he frequently considers suicide to escape a world that he despises. At the beginning of his manuscript, for example, Harry considers cutting his throat with a straight razor. When Harry is called “a bad fellow,
rotten patriot, and traitor to his country” by a young professor who has invited him to dinner, he suppresses his rage against the ignorant colleague and instead turns it inward, coming close to ending his own life. It is revealed in the “Treatise on the Steppenwolf ” that Harry has set his 50th birthday as the day upon which he is permitted “to employ the emergency exit” and that this knowledge makes it bearable for him to keep on living. After he meets Hermine, however, Harry realizes that it is unhealthy to suppress his violent impulses and he starts exploring them. In the Magic Theater he first enters a door inscribed “Jolly Hunting. Great Hunt in Automobiles.” In a darkly comic scene Harry joins the war between men and machines and, together with his school friend Gustav, proceeds to shoot the drivers and passengers of cars. At first, the friends kill and destroy out of a sense of displeasure and despair of the world, but gradually they enjoy the feeling of power and revenge. Ultimately, though, Harry comes to regret that he has unleashed the violence within him: When he is confronted with a harmless, peaceable, and childlike man, “who was still in a state of innocence,” Harry is ashamed of his actions. The theme of violence is explored further in the scene entitled “Marvelous Taming of the Steppenwolf.” Harry encounters an animal tamer, who appears to be his “diabolically distorted double” and who forces a wolf to perform circus tricks that run counter to his wild nature: When presented with a rabbit and a sheep, the wolf lies between them and touches them with his paws, forming “a touching family group.” A sudden role reversal, however, puts the wolf in charge and lets him recover his wild nature. The animal tamer then turns into a wild animal, tearing the rabbit and sheep limb from limb and chewing the living flesh rapturously. The fact that Harry flees the scene in horror is an indication that he is still unable to accept the aggressive, wild animal within. Further proof of Harry’s continuing inability to come to terms with the various facets of his personality is his act of smashing a gigantic mirror that shows the reflection of a beautiful wolf, who is transformed into Harry himself. In the final scene of the Magic Theater, entitled “How One Kills for Love,”
The Outsidersâ•…â•… 565 Harry finds the naked figures of Hermine and Pablo asleep after a bout of lovemaking. He notices a bruise beneath Hermine’s left breast that shows the imprint of Pablo’s “beautiful, gleaming teeth” and he plunges a knife to the hilt into the bruise in a fit of jealousy: “Before she had ever been mine, I had killed my love.” Harry clearly has not yet learned how to channel his aggressive and violent impulses properly. Whereas some critics have interpreted the novel’s ending as pessimistic and considered Harry Haller’s attempts to explore the sexual as well as violent urges of his personality ultimately a failure, Hermann Hesse himself stressed that he conceived Steppenwolf not as the portrait of a man who is in despair but rather as that of a believer. He stated that the story does not lead to death and destruction but rather to healing. Perhaps one can take a clue from the fictional editor of the book who asserts that, even though Harry Haller’s experiences greatly upset the outsider and caused him to leave town precipitously, he is convinced that the Steppenwolf did not commit suicide. Karl Stegner
Hinton, S. E.â•… The Outsidersâ•… (1967)
The Outsiders introduces a group of friends in the 1950s who live on the poor side of town and have to deal with all of the prejudices and realities of poverty. Ponyboy Curtis is the 14-year-old narrator of this story. While he is the youngest of his brothers, as well as the youngest of all of the friends with whom they associate, he is also the storyteller, both literally and figuratively, and he sees what happens around him more clearly than most of the other characters are able to do. At the beginning of the story, Ponyboy can see the world only from his own perspective. He believes his oldest brother doesn’t like him, and is mean to him as a result. He believes that the Socs, the rich kids, have no problems because they have money. Over the course of the novel, he realizes that his oldest brother is strict with him because he cares so much about Ponyboy and couldn’t bear to lose him. Also, he befriends Cherry, a Soc girl, and begins to understand that “things are tough all over.” Money doesn’t buy happiness, love, or a sense of personal
security. Unfortunately his journey to these realizations (one could say his journey toward maturity or adulthood) includes violence and heartbreak. Two of his good friends are killed during the story, and he watches several other characters deal with less tragic, but still painful, changes. This is a narrative of growth, with the focus on the growing pains. Kathleen McDonald
The American dream in The Outsiders
The debate over whether anyone can achieve his or her American dream has raged since long before the term was coined in 1913, and continues in full force today. Hinton’s The Outsiders shows how a group of people whose birth was not fortuitous, who had to fight for every scrap that they had. Their biggest fight comes when they have to face people who can not believe that these greasers have the ability to achieve anything worthwhile, much less the respect to appreciate it if they did. The two groups in this novel seem to divide on lines of socioeconomic status. The Socs have every material advantage that money and status can provide; the greasers are constantly struggling simply to make ends meet. However, our narrator realizes that this line is porous and allows for movement back and forth. Ponyboy notes that “the only thing that keeps Darry from bein’ a Soc is us.” When Cherry and Ponyboy discuss their mutual appreciation of watching sunsets, it leads Ponyboy to a realization: “Maybe the two different worlds we lived in weren’t so different.” Yet for these characters, this division is very real. Darry, the oldest brother, can not afford to go to college, even with an athletic scholarship. Sodapop, the middle brother, has dropped out of high school to work and help keep the family together after their parents died. It is easy to see how the lack of money and goods has contributed to the problems of the greasers; however, Hinton shows how the exact opposite situation contributed to the destruction of the Socs. Cherry spells out this situation in her first conversation with Ponyboy: You greasers have a different set of values. . . . We’re sophisticated—cool to the point of not feeling anything. Nothing is real to
566â•…â•… Hinton, S. E. us. . . . Did you ever hear of having more than you wanted? So that you couldn’t want anything else and then started looking for something else to want? It seems like we’re always searching for something to satisfy us, and never finding it. Later that evening, Ponyboy realizes: “the Socs had so much spare time and money that they jumped us and each other for kicks.” Ponyboy eventually realizes that this freedom from want or the need to work was what led to the death of Bob, a Soc. In a final encounter between Ponyboy and Bob’s best friend, Randy, Randy notes: “most parents would be proud of a kid like that—good lookin’ and smart and everything, but they gave in to him all the time. He kept trying to make someone say ‘No’ and they never did. . . . If the old man had just belted him—just once, he might still be alive.” The ability to achieve individual dreams is implied, especially as characters age. Just before the big rumble at the end of the story, Ponyboy evaluates the greasers assembled for the fight. He recognizes that some actually seem to enjoy being hoods and would likely be hoods for the entirety of their lives. However, when he looks at his brothers and himself, he sees something different: I looked at Darry. He wasn’t going to be any hood when he got old. He was going to get somewhere. Living the way we do would only make him more determined to get somewhere. That’s why he’s better than the rest of us, I thought. He’s going somewhere. And I was going to be like him. I wasn’t going to live in a lousy neighborhood all my life. Although Ponyboy uses a concrete, material example of what achieving his American dream would mean (living in a better neighborhood), the emphasis is not on things but on not being a hood, not simply accepting the life that one started with, but being determined and making changes to acquire a better life. At the end of the novel, Ponyboy has reached the point where he is making sense of what happened. A letter that his friend Johnny had written before he died sums up the belief that the American dream
does exist, even for greasers: “And don’t be so bugged over being a greaser. You still have a lot of time to make yourself be what you want.” Hinton’s novel points out how strong the obstacles to achieving the American dream can be, but ultimately supports the premise that innate talents combined with hard work make it achievable for all. Kathleen McDonald
Cruelty in The Outsiders
Violence pervades The Outsiders. If it is not actively taking place in a particular scene, the threat of it constantly exists just under the surface. Physical fights occur, both between individuals and between groups. Characters are beaten, some badly, and several even lose their lives from violent encounters. Most of the characters carry knives or guns in anticipation of meeting violence. Yet cruelty and violence are not synonyms. Violence is often a manifestation of cruelty, but each can occur in the absence of the other. Some of the cruelest moments in The Outsiders occur without physical violence, yet these moments still disturb deeply. In the first encounter with Cherry and her friend at the Drive-In, Ponyboy notes the cruel taunting that Dally subjects the girls to, and his discomfort with this treatment. He says: I had a sick feeling that Dally was up to his usual tricks, and I was right. He started talking, loud enough for the two girls to hear. He started out bad and got worse. Dallas could talk awful dirty if he wanted to and I guess he wanted to then. I felt my ears get hot. TwoBit or Steve or even Soda would have gone right along with him, just to see if they could embarrass the girls, but that kind of kicks just doesn’t appeal to me. Ponyboy rightly interprets Dally’s motive to be to make the girls in front of them suffer. He notes that Dally “was up to his usual tricks” and is not pleased. His discomfort shows through his ears getting hot and his unwillingness to participate with the much stronger, both physically and in personality, Dally, in teasing these girls, depicting his awareness of how cruel Dally is being.
The Outsidersâ•…â•… 567 The girls themselves show their consciousness of Dally’s cruelty: “The girls got mad. ‘You’d better leave us alone,’ the redhead said in a biting voice, ‘or I’ll call the cops.’↜” Dally is not impressed with this threat and continues his cruelty by mocking this very legitimate claim for social authority to protect them from unwanted and inappropriate behavior: “↜‘Oh, my, my’—Dally looked bored—‘you’ve got me scared to death. You ought to see my record sometime, baby.’ He grinned slyly. ‘Guess what I’ve been in for?’↜” When Cherry realizes that threatening legal ramifications is unlikely to work, she switches from a threat to a plea: “↜‘Please leave us alone,’ she said. ‘Why don’t you just be nice and leave us alone?’↜” This tactic actually works as Dally saunters away to get drinks for everyone, but this is only because his cruelty was the mask he was using to begin a conversation with the girls. His actual objective was about getting attention from girls who are in a higher socioeconomic class, so the unwritten rules of their teenage society told him they were out of his league. If Dally had approached them directly in a friendly manner and was shot down, he risked being laughed at, both by the girls and by his own friends. For many boys, but especially those concerned about having a tough-guy reputation, being laughed at is the cruelest response of all. Therefore, his outward cruelty to these girls hides his own fear of being the object of cruelty and derision. This is confirmed by the fact that he brings back Cokes for everyone, including both girls, and sits down beside Cherry when he returns. This psychological understanding in no way makes Dally’s behavior acceptable, as Cherry shows in the story by throwing the Coke in his face. But knowing a character’s motives permits a deeper insight into both the character and the story. In a later scene, Johnny notes how the absence of violence can be the cruelest treatment of all: “‘I think I like it better when the old man’s hittin’ me!’ Johnny sighed. ‘At least then I know he knows who I am. I walk in that house, and nobody says anything. I walk out, and nobody says anything. I stay away all night, and nobody notices.’↜” For Johnny, the only notice his parents ever pay to him is to be abusive. As bad as that physical abuse is, he realizes that the pain of their pretending he doesn’t exist is just as bad, if not worse.
In The Outsiders, cruelty is a main theme that runs throughout the entire novel. Sometimes it is linked directly to violence; other times it is not. But with or without physical violence attached, the cruelty these characters all have to contend with throughout the novel is frightening in its scope. Great literature makes us think and feel. When we consider how pervasive is the cruelty in this novel, we should do both. Kathleen McDonald
Heroism in The Outsiders
There is one clear-cut example of heroism in this story: The abandoned church where Ponyboy and Johnny are hiding out from the police catches fire and they rush into the burning building to save several little kids caught inside. While Ponyboy and Johnny are still inside, the building falls apart and a burning beam falls on Johnny, breaking his back. This dangerous choice to save children that they don’t even know is an act that results in everyone labeling them heroes. There are newspaper articles written about them, and even when strangers find out that they were only in the church because they were running from murder charges, that is not enough to make people think them less heroic. However, while this is publicly labeled heroism, there are several other acts in the story that are, perhaps, even more heroic, due to their premeditated and less public nature. When Dally comes to find Ponyboy and Johnny in the church, he tells them that Cherry has agreed to come forward and testify that Ponyboy acted in self defense. Cherry risks her physical safety in order to try to make things right. Although they don’t jump her, with tensions running so high after a greaser killed a Soc, she couldn’t have been sure that this would be the case, regardless of her motives. Beyond the courage that this physical encounter required, Cherry shows her heroism in a much stronger way. She knows that the rules of this society require her to ignore greasers, as she tells Ponyboy the night they meet: “if I see you in the hall at school or someplace and don’t say hi, well, it’s not personal or anything.” However, that rule is trumped by her feelings of responsibility. She believes that the entire situation is, at least partially, her fault. As the
568â•…â•… Homer Â� girlfriend of the dead boy, no one would ever expect her to do anything to help the people who killed him. Yet she does. She is willing to testify against her dead boyfriend and her entire social group, to help two boys she barely knows, one of whom killed her boyfriend, just because it is the right thing to do: unheralded heroism. There is another powerful example of unheralded heroism in this story. Ponyboy’s oldest brother, Darry, had the grades for college, but when the boys’ parents died, Darry had to make a choice between college for himself and keeping a home together for his younger brothers. Even with Ponyboy’s inability to understand Darry in the beginning of the story, he can see that Darry has sacrificed a lot, so that he and Sodapop didn’t have to go to foster care. Darry worked hard, sacrificing his own dreams and ambitions, so that Ponyboy and his younger brothers could fulfill theirs. The story has a major act of publicly declared heroism, yet it is not any more important than any of the other less-heralded heroic acts. It creates a pivotal plot twist that is essential to the conclusion of the story but is equal thematically to the heroism displayed by Cherry or Darry or many of the other characters. In this novel, heroism symbolizes the changes associated with growing up. As you mature, you must take responsibility. You must do this regardless of personal desires or peer pressure. Through this story, Ponyboy (and hopefully the reader) realizes that heroism, recognized or not, requires the maturity to sacrifice. Kathleen McDonald
Homerâ•… The Iliadâ•… (800–650 b.c.e.)
The Iliad is one of two great epic poems attributed to Homer. Little is known about Homer or the composition of the two works, but The Iliad was probably written between 800 and 650 b.c.e. It is the tale of a brief period in the 10th (and final) year of the Trojan War, as the Greeks are besieging the city of Troy. The war began when Helen, the world’s most beautiful woman, ran away with a Trojan prince named Paris. Helen’s husband Menelaus, together with his brother, King Agamemnon, gathers the Greek armies and sails after Helen. The
Greeks’ greatest warrior is Achilles, who is joined by his close friend Patroclus. Other major Achaeans (another name for the Greeks) include Odysseus, the cleverest man alive, and Diomedes, a fearless warrior. The Trojans are led by their greatest warrior, Hector, one of Paris’s brothers. Aeneas (who it is said will later found Rome), Glaucus, and Sarpedon are all key Trojan allies. Hector’s wife Andromache and his father, King Priam, dread the war’s outcome. The Iliad is the story of “the rage of Achilles” (77). Agamemnon has taken Chryses, the daughter of Apollo’s priest, as a prize. When Agamemnon refuses the priest’s request for her return, the god Apollo ravages the Greeks with a plague. Agamemnon returns Chryses, but seizes Briseis instead (who was Achilles’ prize). Achilles is enraged at this insult and refuses to fight for the Greeks. Without him, the Greeks are unable to win and both sides suffer terrible losses. Eventually, Patroclus fights in Achilles’ place and is slain, leading Achilles to seek vengeance on Hector. Achilles slays Hector, even though he knows that he is fated to die soon after. Throughout the story, gods like Zeus, Athena, and Apollo take sides in the fighting and scheme to help their favorite mortals. The Iliad is a classic epic of war, exploring a range of themes that include death, fate, heroism, pride, and violence. James Ford
Death in The Iliad
The main subject of The Iliad is Achilles’ rage, and the first few lines show that the cost of that rage is death—“hurling down to the House of Death so many sturdy souls, great fighters’ souls, but made their bodies carrion, feasts for the dogs and birds” (77). It begins with the plague sent by the god Apollo, “and the corpse-fires burned on, night and day, no end in sight” (79). Achilles’ mother Thetis wails that he is “doomed to a short life,” but the poem also demonstrates that all human beings ultimately “have so little time” (91). The gods play with human life in The Iliad. Zeus sends a “murderous dream” to tell Agamemnon that Troy is now his for the taking, when in reality his army will be devastated (99). The armies gather for a titanic battle, but instead Paris challenges Menelaus to single combat. Both sides pray for victory,
The Iliadâ•…â•… 569 but even more for an end to the war. Instead, the goddess Aphrodite rescues Paris before Menelaus can kill him. The great clash of armies resumes, with “screams of men and cries of triumph breaking in one breath, fighters killing, fighters killed, and the ground streamed blood” (160). Slain heroes are named, while countless others suffer nameless deaths. Antilochus kills the Trojan captain Echepolus, and the slaughter is on. Elephenor tries to strip the dead man’s gear and is himself stabbed in the ribs. “His life spirit left him and over his dead body now the savage work went on” (160–161). Meanwhile, Apollo cheers the Trojans on with a cry of “Stab them, slash their flesh!