This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
in the coordinates *i= 3a. Set p (P, Q) = <j>(r (P, Q)); this is positive for Py^Q and is of class C. The function F(P,Q)=« (P,Q)-^=^i (P, i&tm~m i = 0, and so f Gi{P,Z)-/{P )*1 -'Af U «/2, (S, 0, r N with degree +0 is homotopic to a branched cover iff (1) ^ ( N H w ^ A f ) ; and 2) \dj>j^ or tp^m^M^K^N) *h = ug. It is known that the (2,0)-part of the quadratic differential / is weakly conformal. A nonconstant weakly conformal harmonic map — 0; around the image of each of these points there are normal coordinates in which
) for any map d>:M^N,and tp°\p is harmonic iff (p is harmonic. In particular, the energy (2.4) and the notion of harmonicity are conformal invariants of (M,g). More generally, the composition :{M*g)->{N,h) inducing 0, minimising E amongst all maps representing 6. s (S, h). Any such map is conformal, or equivalently + holomorphic (i.e., holomorphic or anti-holomorphic) with respect to the associated complex structures on Af and N. Thus in order to find all such harmonic maps, we can represent both copies of the sphere minus one point as complex planes. Then a harmonic map can be represented by the rational functions (a , b e C) t ; and because in such a homotopy class lifts to a map ,'s to e . If p + 2, a similar construction permits us to represent the class associated to a morphism mapping exactly onec,. t o e This is illustrated in the case p = 3 in Fig. 5: A curve from one boundary of the cylinder with handles to the other represents that c , and the handles are placed symmetrically around the cylinder (which requirement imposes the restriction on p). ; fR with mean curvature H and Gauss map y, given by Kenmotsu [23]; we are indebted to Banchoff for calling our attention to that work. Indeed, if we let y also denote the map M'->IR defined as y composed with stereographic projection, where M' = A f - y ( 0 , 0 , +1), then 3 e[0,jr], the image of the rectangle covers once the hemisphere. From the identifications indicated in Fig. 8, we check that ) implies therefore that is an isomorphism. (2.4) For our application of the implicit function theorem, we consider the tension field r defined in (2.3) as a map 9 0 and J ( f t ) ^ 0 ior s < i}. As above, S is closed; and we observe that the method of Schoen-Yau applies to this deformation to show that S is open : Indeed, use the complex structure of M to decompose J dtp, | = | d' tp, | -f- | d" tp, | . Take tn^S; then the continuous dependence theorem ensures that \d' 0 on Af for all t near t„. The proof of theorem 3.1 of [26] now applies, to show that / ( f t [ H ° ) > 0; we conclude that a neighbourhood of f„ is contained in S. w ) has singularities. In particular, such a harmonic map homotopic to a diffeomorphism is uot a diffeomorphism (although it might still be a homeomorphtsm). Indeed, any such 3 to N which are homotopic to a branched covering hut are not branched coverings is established in [18]. a+1 N of minimum energy (weakly) conformal? That is true if Af is the real projective plane. 11. Problem. Let M be a closed Riemann surface, N a simply-connected Riemannian manifold, and <j>: M -* N a map of minimum energy. Is ) where t V, UQC , VcC* can be written: 2 denotes the Hermitian inner product on the fibres of that bundle, these structures being obtained by pulling back the standard Hermitian structure on T P " . Note that the condition (2.1) for x = 8 = 1 is that of weak conformality. Furthermore, a i holomorphic map is trivially isotropic and for n — 1 a smooth map is ± holomorphic if and only if it is isotropic. The identities (2.1) are a complex version of those considered by Calabi [Ca] for maps into real projective m-space (or S"). Then we have e/a G , ( C ) . I n fact / , g: M-* P" may be any holomorphic and antiholomorpnic map which satisfy (3.1) for oi-\- B^n—t. For t>l, g is not determined uniquely by these conditions (c.f. [D-Z3J). n+1 -'{L*tg) L -)) in the sense that, if D denotes the connection on this bundle induced from the connection on g>~ (L* xL ), D" y> = 0. Now as in [Wo4] by a result of J . L . Koszul [Ko] we can interpret this bundle as a holomorphic bundle over M with S operator given by F)" . Then rp is genuinely a holomorphic section of a holomorphic bundle and hence, near any zero x , has the form z 'F(x) where ^ 0 and z is a complex coordinate centred on x . f(x) is decomposable for all x # x and hence also for x = x so we may set P" as a real-analytic mapping. We may define the «-th augmented D'-associated curve of { ? ( C " ) (a = 0 , 1 , s ) , by including 0(x) in the multia ",: M -> maps. = ff! thus ± holomorphic maps I f ^-P" are included in the classification theorem. ){n A- 1) + n ( l — p)J. I n particular, for « = oo, all such maps N is harmonic if and only if, on each chart U t is harmonic since, as a map into G (C )xG (C~ '), its components are ± holomorphic, and by Lemma 3.9, it is horizontal with respect to n. Hence by Lemma 3.5, $ is harmonic. +, ~ ' ( L * ® L ); under the isomorphism ( 4 . 2 ) i = -8"{D' CP". We say that 0 is (complex) isotropic if a (x) are mutually orthogonal. In particular, the definition is independent of chart. for all a , 0 ^ 1. The equivalence of (5.3) and (5.1) is then immediate. To show (ii), the vital point is that, since is realvalued and has norm I , & ) r {p) € <7„{f ). Similarly, D"D' . LEMMA 6.2. would also be linearly dependent on these. Real analyticity would then imply that 0 had D'-order less than s, contradicting the definition of r. I y A ••• A D ' 0 ) = O. Next, note that by Lemma 6.3, i v i O . Setting a = s we conclude that B' consists of isolated points. Now suppose wEB'. Then since w is holomorphic we can write w(x') = (z(x') — z(x)) W~(x') for all x' on some open neighbourhood U' of x, where p is a positive integer and W E ^(A) is holomorphic and nowhere zero. Since W(x') is decomposable for x' # J C , it remains decomposable for x'=x, and we can define fy' (x) as the adimensional subspace defined by rV(x). From the formula for w we see that this is independent of choice of chart U. Uniqueness of the extension is clear, for Hf\B' is dense in M. a y satisfying the isotropy condition (5.1) for a + < y. In particular, if # is not antiholomorphic (resp. not holomorphic), we can always define jt| (resp. "_ _,); consequently, u , D"4>) - u"{D' on the open dense subset where D ' 0 ^ 0 . By differentiation we find that all D" P 1) are linearly dependent on D' 1. Shifting D' as usual, we conclude that " ,B = ° M > 0 with a + B^t 1. | R< ,tf>)= 0 For all o ^ I: For if not, there is a ^ 2 3 ,4>) = 0 for l < y < a . Then on some neighbourhood U of x, V is spanned by D' ' #: 0 < y < a - 1}, and hence in V. It follows that V is ^"-closed on U; i.e., d"W 'V) c %(V). By real analyticity, V is 3"-closed. But now V is d'- and ^"-closed; consequently, K is a fixed 2-dimensional subspace for all xEM. But ji(jc) lies in that subspace for all xEM, contradicting fullness. We conclude that (D' 4>, 4>) = 0 for all a j>1, and by shifting D', we see that this implies that o is isotropic. I , )=0 pour tout a, P £ l , b etant I'extension complexe de la metrique riemannienne de N. Cetle notion est fortement reliee a cellc dc J ,-liolomorphicite; en particulier. celle-ci depend seulement de la structure conforme de N. Eneffel, une application isotrope est conforme; et au moins une des applications tp , (p_ esl J holomorphe. Done an moins une des applications tp^ correspondant a une application harmonique isotrope est horizon tale. + 0, define . 0 ; N satisfying (2.8). 2 ) for alt x e M (see also [16]). (6.3) Simple examples (e.g. maps between spheres) in the spirit of those in (1.6) show that we cannot expect such universal a priori estimates, in general. Indeed, except for those in [6] (see 58 therein), I know of no general context in which we have a priori estimates of the form: Given m, n, g, h, k = 1 or 2, and a component 9£ of (M, A/), there are a priori C* -estimates (0 < a < 1) on harmonic maps in 3if. Apparently the methods of partial regularity described in Section 3 do not apply to that problem. +a ' dz ( ) (x) T M through the origin in IR". From (3.5) we obtain the following result of Chern [13]: 2 v tp is pseudo-umbilic with constant mean curvature # 0 . l R " be a conformal immersion of the sphere 5, with constant mean curvature. Then tp maps 5 minimally into some hypersphere. Indeed, y is harmonic by (3.13); and conformal by (2.4), because every holomorphic quadratic differential on S is identically 0. Ruh [65] also shows that if tp : S —* S* has trivial normal bundle, then tp maps 5" onto a great 2-sphere in S*. v R" "', where j : S" —* I R denotes the standard inclusion map); and consider its Gauss map y„: M - » G ( E ) as in (3.2); here G (JR" ' ) is the Grassmannian of oriented 3-spaces in E " * , Then ([11], [44] for the first assertion; and [57] for the second): tp is harmonic iffy is harmonic. And S a n d writing;°(p = IR" " ; ?3 =^3 ° <j> ( ™£ normal Gauss map of S" has constant mean curvature iff qi: M—*G (S") in harmonic. l N is a holomorphic immersion of M into a Kahier manifold A/, then the Gauss lift factors: i N\s 2 x N and J -ho!omorphic maps tp:M->Q(N). (In that statement we exclude constant maps tp and vertical maps <j>.) Again, the proof involves essentially analysis of types: We decompose the induced complex tangent bundle is a section of T*M ® tp~ A TN; its (2,0)-component n = (V WT,KH J$l r °$ d Tt, o i/> are. Then [30]: TVie" assignment f i> — 3? , ,, and full strongly isotropic maps N isotropic? Some examples were mentioned in (5.9), and others can be found in [30], [62]. However, we do not yet have sufficiently good conditions for isotropy of a surface of genus p mapped into C P " (n ^ 3); or of a sphere S mapped into 0 3 ( C ) or Q„. Isotropy conditions are described a) via holomorphic £-adic differentials on M. See [10] and [27, § 7 ] , following the original idea of Hopf [43]; and also [14], [17], where those computations were rederived using the method of moving frames. b) They can also be interpreted as conservation laws of the associated variational principle defining harmonic maps [ 4 ] , [62]. Much more can be expected from both interpretations. z ), with equality iff tp is conformal [24]. Thus if tp is conformal and minimizes A, then it minimizes E. Also [67], if((p, ft) is an extremal of E with respect to variations of both tp and the conformal structure p. of M, then tp ; (M, u) —* (N, h) is a conformal harmonic map. (6.9) Experience over the past twenty years has taught us that only in exceptional circumstances can we except a homotopy class of maps to contain a map minimizing E; and that not every homotopy class will contain a harmonic map [25]. In particular, we cannot expect to have a systematic variational method producing (weak) extrema of E. Regularity is in somewhat better shape—yet another simplifying aspect of 2-dimensional domains [35]. Thus we have been forced to turn elsewhere: To twistor representations, thereby exploiting the interrelationships between harmonicity and holomorphicity—such as is found in the Weierstrass representation formula [40], [38], [7]. (6.10) However, we certainly must not lose track of those variational origins. In particular, there is need to a) develop further the stability properties of conformal harmonic maps tp : M —* N, for both functional E and A; b) calculate/estimate the Morse index of such maps—for they are often not minima of E. And find a form of critical point theory for E; C°{M, A/)—»R, sufficient at least to give information on the energy spectrum [26]; c) analyze the effect on conformal harmonic maps by a change of metric h on N. In particular, how does the complex structure J in (5.3) vary with /i? d) For tp ; M —* IR" conformal and harmonic we have 2 is both J and J holomorphic, then it is horizontal, and as explained in section 6, its projection rp is a real isotropic harmonic map. Such maps include, Bryant's superminimal immersions in #*, most of the known minimal surfaces in the complex projective plane C P [ E W J , and by work of Micallef [M] many stable minimal surfaces in Euclidean space R*. Indeed, we explain that twistor methods are most valuable when tbe target ma.nifn.ln is selfdual and Einstein. Spinor terniinology is used for the first time in section 8, to introduce the twistor degrees of a conformal harmonic map (N, h) is conformal and g — tp*h. First tp is said to have constant mean curvature if V r = 0. The condition complementary to r = 0 is that Vdtp have no trace-free component; in this case tp is said to be totally umbilic. Using h(d y, dtp) = 0, this is equivalent to the equation dtp/\ d'tp = 0. Finally tp is totally geodesic if Vdtp = 0. x R" is harmonic iff its Gauss map y^: M->Q„_ is antiholomorphic, a result due to Chern [Ch!]. More generally a theorem of Buh-Vilms [ E V ] states that a conformal immersion (p: TJf^R" has constant mean curvature iff j t is harmonic. For an arbitrary manifold N, there is no way of associating a Gauss map in the traditional sense to an immersion /\S3tp), • S , its projection tp = 7toy> is conformal. Provided tp is not vertical, i.e. not contained in a fibre, we must have y> — $ so by theorem 5.3 again a> is also harmonic. 2 l , span an isotropic subspace of (TN) , and for i f = R P coincides with [ E W , definition 5.6; B , section 6]. Putting r = s = 1 shows that ip is conformal, so real isotropy may be regarded as a generalization of conformality. 2 ) = 0= .«-(O»M. , d = 0, (10.2) is immediate, so we may assume that da>A{d rpV' = 0 (see (6.5)). Thus + y = cos6 , where m", to" are the Kahier forms of M, JV (as in section 3). If JH* is compact, then N M , 0 denotes the standard inner product on C , antilinear in the second factor, then J is holomorphic and q> is associated. Letting 0 denote the set of full holomorphic maps i ¥ ^ C P (those not contained in some C P ) one obtains the following special case of the classification theorem [ E W , theorem 6.9]: t - 2)e", (1 - 2(0)6'", 3 = i o
• • ,x )
a
in U.
If we write similarly
then
(9) {
letting V i denote covariant differentiation on M relative x . The Dirichlet integral of * £ A"{M, W) is 2ZJ(d>) —
A»(M,W)
=H"{M,W)
© [dA^(M,W)
1
+
&A'» (M,W)~\
I
P
where H (M, W), the space of harmonic p-forms with values in W, is orthogonal to the other two summands. 5. The curvature of the connection can be expressed in U by an m X W matrix of 2-forms ® = ( ® ) where ® = dd + 0 A^ I f V denotes the covariant differential of M, then we define the covariant differential V on 4>eA*(M,W) by u
u
u
u
U
u
a f t
Letting i i / denote Ri"I, the diagonal m X m matrix each of whose diagonal terms is the Eicci tensor field Ri" (we follow the sign convensions in Eisenhart in defining By—-jBPyi)., we have for any q> £ A (M, W) the following expression for the components of the Laplacean of
where ( denotes the transposition of matrices. 1
I f tb^^ A (M,W), define the function Z7 we have (usual Laplacean A of functions)
*##f)
on M ; then in
14 122
J A M E S E E L L S , JR. AND J . H . SAMPSON. u
where a denotes the Riemannian structure of W in V. For each
W)
define the function m)= a® ) -m('P u m*.
(id
,
u
i
h
a
v
The matrix (of functions) of Q is
We consider this as an nm X rim matrix in the subscripts (ah), (0i); as such, it is symmetric: QaB — Qfx* The integral over M of &(d>-di/2) is always zero, by Green's theorem. Thus if
(12)
ih
f (*)»1-
f
( V ^ ^ r f ^ V ^ ' t ^ J M ^ O .
( B ) Given any / £ 9* (M, M'), let /"'ff (M') - » M be the induced vector bundle; it is clearly Riemannian-connected. Let us interpret the preceding development for that bundle. l
First of all, the elements of A°(M,f- 3(M')) are canontcally identified with the vector fields along f (i.e., with the elements of the space 91(f), in the notation of § 2 A ) . Secondly, for any PtM the differential f * ( P ) : M(P)—>M'(f(P)) is a linear map, to be considered as an element of M'(f(P))®MW(P); otherwise said, the assignment P^>f*(P) determines a specific 1-form / * £ A (M,f- -3 (W)). Thirdly, we have 1
,
J M
LEMMA. For any /£ Sf(Sl,M') tolA*(M,f-^3(M')). Thus if* Proof.
we have Sf* = 0; i.e., f„ is orthogonal dUf*.
Take a coordinate chart U on M, and write
(13)
SyW^T'viPffdxK u
Then {U )* — fffc>, (
^
D
)
whence 7
" w
(l
A
m
+ v w * *
a
m
which is zero, because both coefficients are symmetric in t, j . r
Similarly, the variation gf £ A°(M, f'^3 (M )) tation +
&f*h
u
s^V.Vi/HrVfW)
has coordinate represen4 m
15 HARMONIC MAPPINGS OP R I E M A N N I A N MANIFOLDS.
123
PROPOSITION. For any f € St (M, M') its differential f#is a closed 1-form. Its tension field r(f) = — 8/*, the divergence of its differential. The map f is harmonic if and only if its differential is a harmonic 1-form. Definition. For any map f S Si (M, M') its fundamental form f3(f) is the covariant differential V / * of its differential. Thus fi(f) is the f- 3(M')vatued 2-covariant tensor field on 31 whose coordinate representation is 1
m -
B
Sij-'+^fi% -f
^-
The tension field r(f) is just the trace of fi(f); i.e., &(f\—g*§n^ ( l ^ T ^ m ) . I t follows from § 2D that if f is a Riemannian immersion, then 0(f) is the second fundamental form of M in 31'. Analogously, let us say that a map / € 9i(M,M') is totally geodesic if 0(f) —0 on M; we will see as a consequence of Corollary 5A below that totally geodesic maps map geodesies into geodesies. u
(C) Let us consider the function Q(f*); from the expression (® 0 )i* = g R'aBi$fk"fi we compute (11), taking into account the skew symmetry ® ®ea to obtain the a
Rk
u
S
u
oB
LEMMA. (14) Its
For any smooth map f: M-*M' we have Q(U)
W
W
W
1
'
1
matrix (for arbitrary forms d>£ A (M,f- 3(M')))
(15)
-
W
*
is
7
Q «
PW* ftW'—
aB
If f is harmonic, then (16)
*e(f) = \J3(f)\* + Q(f*)-
We will refer to the matrix (15) as the Ricci transformation on the tensor product bundle f~*3 (M') ® 3 (M). Observe that if / is a real-valued function on M, then that Ricci transformation is just that given by the Ricci tensor of M. [l]
Remark. The above computations can of course be made without passing through the medium of vector-bundle-valued differential forms. One starts by applying the Ricci identities (Eisenhart [8, p. 30]) to the direct evaluation of &e(f), and then reads off the appropriate terms. The next result follows the well known pattern of Bochner; in [2] Bochner has also applied the method in a special case for maps. THEOREM.
If f: M->M' is a harmonic map, then
16 124
J A M E S B E L L S , J R . AND J . H . SAMPSOV.
r
«(/*)*!
m
J M
and equality holds when and only when f is totally geodesic. Furthermore, *f Q{f*)=® 3fj then f is totally geodesic and has constant energy density e(f). o
Proof.
n
This follows at once from Stokes' Theorem f
Ae(f)*l = 0,
applied to (16); for if Ae(f) £ £ 9 , then A e ( f ) = 0 everywhere, whence e{f) is a constant function. Following the conventions of Eisenhart [8], we say that the Ricci curvature of M is non-negative if at every point P £ M the matrix (—R (P) ) is positive semi-definite. tf
COROLLARY. Suppose that the Ricci curvature of M is non-negative and that the Riemannian curvature of M' is non~positive. Then a map f: M—*M' is harmonic if and only if it is totally geodesic. Furthermore, 1) if there is at least one point of M at which its Ricci curvature is positive, then every harmonic map f: M—*M' is constant; 2) if the Riemannian curvature of M' is everywhere negative, then every harmonic map f:M-*M' is either constant or maps M onto a closed geodesic of M'. Proof.
The theorem shows that
If hypothesis 1) is satisfied at ? £ M, then / * { P ) = 0 , whence the constant ( / ) = 0 ; i- v / is a constant map. If hypothesis 2) is satisfied at P = f(P)£M' and we take normal coordinates centered at P, then the f*(P)-image of the tangent space M(P) has dimension £ 1 . If it has dimension 0 at any f(P), then again e(f) — 0; otherwise, the image f (P)M(P) has constant dimension 1. Because f is totally geodesic, the conclusion follows. e
e
r
tl
Example. If f: M—*M' is a harmonic immersion, then e ( / ) = n / 2 , and | j3{f)\ -\- Q(f#) = 0. This relation also follows from Gauss's equations (Eisenhart [8, p. 162]) 2
17 HARMONIC MAPPINGS OP RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS. 11
by multiplying by g^g
and summing.
135
We obtain n-ni ir=I
il
where fi = g h \i is the w-th the immersion (see ( 7 ) ) ; each Riemannian curvature of M' R — R gy of M is negative immersion of M in M'. a
a
j
iS
component of the mean normal curvature of p.„ — 0 if / is harmonic. FOT instance, if the is non-positive and if the scalar curvature at some point, then there is no harmonic
4. Examples. 1
(A) The case dim M = 1. Let us take for M the unit cirele S , coordin a t e d by the central angle 6. For any f£(S\M') we have 2 *1.
The tension field is t ( / )
+
W -"*
dt
df'
which (when the parameter of f is proportional to arc length) is often called the curvature (or acceleration) of f.
We have
1
(B) The case dim M = 2. We established here certain relations showing the close connection of our problem with the Plateau problem, in its potential theoretic formulation (Morrey [ 1 9 ] and Bochner [ 3 ] } ; incidentally, we see that in our energy theory the cases dim M £j 2 are favored. Recall that a map h: M->M' is conformat if there is a smooth function 6: M^»R such that h*g' = exrj(2e)g. Thus the differential h% preserves orthogonality and dilatates uniformly. Clearly such a map is a smooth immersion, and has energy density e(h) =
7iexp(20)/S.
18 126
J A M E S EET.T.S, J B . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
PHOPOBITION. If dimM = w = 2 and h: M-*M is a conformal difeomorphism, then for all f€3t(M,M') we have E(foh) = E(f). Moreover, h is harmonic. a
tl
a
3
Proof. First of all, (/ ° k), = f «hf, whence 3e(f °h) = g hfhfif f g' . The conformaltity condition foT h implies g'thfhj" = exp(%0)gM, and substituting gives f
3e
(f
f
o h) - ex (Z$)g^Wf/g' V
II
aB
- 3 exp(20) e(/).
aB
Secondly, we have -
[det(j Vty)/det( ,,)]»*l F t
f f
— esp(n#)*l, so that if 7i = 3 we have h*(e{f)*l)
= e(f"°ft)*l.
Finally, in suitable local coordinates on M we have iy = i v and
direct computation shows that T
V(f)
+V*,—y*»y
(ft)* = (2 — n)<7% .
(l^i^n).
PROPOSITION, dimilf— 2, then for any f€Si(M,M') we have ^E(f). Equality holds when and only when f is conformal.
Proof. The first statement follows immediately from the inequalities (2). Suppose f is conformal; then for fi = 2 we obtain y(f)-
f
exp(2t?}[ „^?
ConverBelyj if V(f) —E{f)
2 5 l 2
]S(2^=
(
e{f)*l =
E(f).
we conclude that at every point of M 1
tJ
2[det(/V)y] = ? (/*?')«[det(^)]l. In isothermal coordinates on M we have LW)n-(f*g'UY
{ ( r Y ^ n
whence (f*g')u— tf*9')*2 — 0 = ( / * / ) » • exp(2fl) -
Defining 6:M-*R
by
[det(/*/) /d t(^)]i, y
e
we obtain exp(2fi)jy = (f*g')nCOEOLLABY. f minimizes E. 0
If a map f„: M—>M' minimizes V and is conformal, then
19 HARMONIC MAPPINGS OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS.
127
For any f£ Si (M, M') we have E(f )=V(f )^V(f)^E(f). 0
0
Remark, I f M is a Riemann surface, then its complex structure defines a conformal equivalence class of Riemann structures. The energy of any map /: M—*M' therefore depends only on the complex structure of M. (C) Harmonic fibre maps. For any map f £ Si{M, W) and P€ M we have the vector space Mp(P) = ( u £ M(P): / ( P ) j t = 0}; the vectors in Mv(P) are called vertical. Let J V H ( P ) denote its orthogonal complement in M(P). Suppose that for all P e M the differential f*(P) maps M (P) isometrically onto M'(f(P)). Then / is a locaUy trivial surjective fibre map (see Hermann [13]) ; in particular, / determines an almost product structure on M (i. e., the structural group 0„ of 3 (M) admits a reduction to the product group O X On-m). We will call a map / : M^>M' a Riemannian fibration. +
H
m
Remark. There are smooth titrations / : M—*M? having no Lie structural group; e. g., there are non-trivial compact smooth fibrations over the 3-sphere S" (which cannot have a Lie structural group G, since ir ((?) = 0 ) . I t is a consequence of a theorem of Hermann [13] that the manifolds M, M' admit no Riemann structures compatible with f as above, for which the fibres are totally geodesic. 2
L E M M A . If f: M-*M' is a Riemannian fibration, then for any P e l f there are coordinate charts U and V centered at P and f(P) respectively, in terms of which fi (P) = &V" (1 = i = , 1 = = fft). Furthermore, the first m coordinates in U can be considered as normal coordinates in V, and the last n —m coordinates are local coordinates for the fibres. a
n
a
Proof. Let ( e ) i s „ be an orthonormal base for M(P) such that the first m vectors span MH(P), and the last n — m vectors span My(P). Then f#(P)ei = e\ (lt=i = m) form an orthonorrnal base for M'(f(P)), and we can construct the associated normal coordinates in some neighborhood V. According to Hermann [13] the unique horizontal lift to P of any geodesic of M' starting at f(P) is a geodesic of M; one determined by / lifts to one determined by e . We now use the local product structure to define a coordinate chart V in which the fibres have the desired property. Note that (unless the fibres are totally geodesic) we cannot generally require that the coordinates in U be normal. 1
5
(
(
PROPOSITION.
Let f: M->M'
be a Riemannian fibration. Then e{f)
20 128
J A M E S E E L L S , J B . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
= n/2. If for any P€M we let F denote the fibre through P and i : the inclusion map, then r(f)(Q) U(Q)r(i )(Q) for all QtF . P
P
P
Fp-*M
P
In particular, f is harmonic if and only if all fibres are minimal submanifolds. Proof. In § 2D we have seen that the tension field of any Riemannian immersion is perpendicular to the submanifold. Thus for every Q£ F we have r(i ) (Q) e M (Q). I f we use a split coordinate system as in the previous lemma, we see that m UT(i )(P)t=-2h->Hir) [P)*=i P
P
U
k
P
The proposition foUows by direct calculation. Examples. All covering maps are harmonic; in particular, the identity map is harmonic, which amounts to saying that Cartan's vitesse is a harmonic 1-form. If 3 (M)^*M is the bundle of orthonormal r-frames of M, then it is known (Liehnerowiez [15]) that with its natural Riemannian structure on 3 (M) the fibres are minimal, whence that fibre map is harmonic. Vector bundle maps are harmonic. Every homogeneous Riemannian fibration is harmonic, for the fibres are always totally geodesic, and therefore minimal. r
T
1
(D) Maps into flat manifolds. Let us take for M' the unit circle S ; we will construct harmonic representatives in every homotopy class of maps M—>S . First of all, it is well known that the set [M, S ] of these homotopy classes forms an abelian group canonically isomorphic to the first integral cohomology group 2f*(jflfJ. Secondly, every such cohomology class is canonically represented by a harmonic 1-form on M. l
1
Suppose M is connected, and fix a point P e M. Given any such harmonic 1-form to on M and any smooth path y from P to a point P e M, we define the number B
P
0
tm -1* A different choice y of yp may give a different number f(P), but P
Ki>)-/(P)=
f
«
is an integer since the periods of a are integral; consequently, oi determines a well defined map f : it-*. S by letting f (P) be the residue class modulo 1 of f(P). 1
a
a
21 HARMONIC MAPPINGS OF R I E M A N N LAN MANIFOLDS.
129
Now since f is harmonic, every P e M has a neighborhood U in which df = m; thus A/ = Sdf 4- dSf = Sm = 0 in f7. I t is easy to see that n—^f establishes an isomorphism [M,S ]=H (M). a
a
1
1
To define harmonic representatives of the homotopy classes of maps M—> T , the flat m-torus, we merely take m-fold products of harmonic maps M—*S*. using § 5 C below; the existence of these harmonic representatives was first proved by F . B. Fuller [10]. More generally, any compact flat manifold M' is covered by T , by a theorem of Bieberbach, and any homotopy class of maps M—>M' which can be lifted to maps M—>T has harmonic representatives obtained by composition with the projection T —>M'. m
m
m
m
I f M and M' are both flat, then the only harmonic maps M-*M' are those which are locally linear, as can be seen from the maximum principle. ( E ) Maps of Euclidean spheres. Let S"(r) denote the Euclidean nsphere of radius r; write S" = S" (1). Then the homotopy classes of maps of S" into itself are classified by their degrees. We consider now the problem of constructing explicitly harmonic maps of a given degree fc; it is a simple matter to modify the following remarks to include the case of maps yS"(r)->S"(r'). 1
1
n
If (x ,- • •.a;"* ) are Euclidean coordinates and JJ: S (r) —>$"(/) is a map given by (jrfaV " " . E " * ) = ( z V / j y - - , i t f ^ V / r ) , then 1
6
{
y
i
=
)
n
/
{ry.
W
We will henceforth refer points of S" to coordinates (#,<£), where 6 denotes colatitude ( O ^ 0 S = T T ) , and tj> a point on the equator r?" of S*. Furthermore, corresponding to the integer Tc let * : S"' (r) —* fl* *^!*) be the (n — 3)fold suspension of the map ^ ( r ) —»S (r ) defined by
1
1
(17)
*W =
{
f
c
Z
+
3
1
/
W
~
3
>
(
/
A
>
i
-
n
We are interested in maps f: S»-*8 ol the form (9,^) - » ( © , # ) , where © is a function of 0 alone, and * is defined for r = j = 1. From ( 1 7 ) we see that on ^ ( s m f l ) we have 2e(f) = (fc + n — 3 ) s i n ® / s i n 0 , whence /
2
(18)
9
s
I
22 130
JAMES E E L L S , J R . AND J . EC. SAMPSON.
I n case n = 1 the existence and properties of harmonic maps of degree k is elementary. We now consider the case n = 3. We have gn = l, <7i2 = 0 = 3 i, g = sin 0. The tension field of any map f is given by its components a
2
2Z
(Jf)"],
=Ae-sin cos«[^(g) + Z
T W
0
, „
;
r
0* d® ,
1
a* 0®-]
For the special maps under consideration we find that for a harmonic map f r ( * ) = A* — d^/d
1
d
(
•
d a
®\
>! sinOcos®
the only solution of T ( @ ) = 0 regular at the poles is =k
(19)
® — 3arctan [c(t&n8/%) '] with c > 0.
Then = ± ksin®/sin#, from which we can = 4TT I k | ; note that it is independent of c. Finally, for the degree of a map shows that degree f = ± & . k = 0 and all c > 0 the map is constant; for k — ± 1 the identity and the antipodal map, respectively.
conclude that E(f) the integral formula We observe that for and c = 1 the map is
Remark. Although the above construction does exhibit a harmonic map in every homotopy class, it does not begin to exhaust their topological interest. For instance, with the uniform topology on $t(S ,S ), the component 9t ,(S ,8 ) of those maps of degree 0 has infinite cyclic homology: 2
1
2
s
<
H ^ S l ^ , * ) ) — S
2
) )
=
W 3
(S^)=Z,
generated by the Hopf map. A harmonic representative of that generator should have positive Morse index. Consider now the case n 3 3. We do not know how to construct harmonic maps of degree 3. Incidentally, the suspensions of the above maps (and their "compressed" suspensions below) are generally not harmonic. We propose now to show that the functional E: 91 (S , S") - » R does not have an absolute minimum on the component 9l (S"' 8") for k^O and « > 3; that this phenonmenon could be illustrated explicitly and simply by maps of spheres was suggested to us by C. B. Morrey. : : >
x
k
!
Let &(»><#)!•— ( » 4 * ) , « ) be the map of S»-*S*
defined using (19)
23 HAEMONIC MAPPINGS OP BIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS,
131
with exponent fc ^ 0. Thus for small c > 0 the map /„ compresses most of S" into a small cell centered at the pole, and that compression takes place along longitudes. The energy integral (18) now takes the form
2
Jo
V, amff
/
For » £ 3 w e have
The following lemma shows that 3 i m £ ( f ) = 0 ; i.e., for n S 3 there are c
maps in Sl (8",8 ) map f £ 9t (8 ,S ) has degree 0. n
k
n
n
k
LEMMA. J
of arhitrarily small energy. But for fe^O there is no with zero energy, for such an f is constant, and therefore
2
Bm ® (6)d6^> e
0 as e - » 0.
Proof. For any < > 0 let a = —1/2. There is a number K such that 0 ^ (tan 0/2) g-BTfor all 0 ^ 0 £ p. I t follows that 0 , ( 0 ) ^ 2 arctan(eff), whence there is a number c > 0 for which 0 s i n 0 ( 0 ) < t/2p if 0 < e :£ c . Thus 2
r
c
*/p
5, (A)
«/o
f
-*
p
The composition of maps.
The following computation is elementary.
L E M M A . If / : M—*M' and f: M'-*M" their fundamental forms satisfy (20)
( f » /)
- ^ f V +
are any smooth maps, then
f ^fm ;
COBOLLABY. TAe composition of totally geodesic maps is totally geodesic. The inverse of a totally geodesic diffeomorphism is totally geodesic. COHOLLABY.
(21)
r(fof)^ (f)^ T
+
fifrfffif
If f is harmonic and f totally geodesic, then f of is harmonic. I n general, however, we do not expect the composition of harmonic maps to be harmonic, as the following example shows:
24
133
JAMES E E L L S , JR- AND J . H . SAMPSON. 2
Example. Let T be the flat 3-torus parametrized by the angles (6, <j>) with 0 g 0, ,, < 2sr. Let f':T ^> S be defined by 2
3
f(6,4>) — {cosfl, s i n 0 , c o s ^ , s i n ^ ) / V 2
;
2
considered as a point in fi*. Then / ' defines a Riemannian imbedding of T in S , which is a minimal hut not a totally geodesic imbedding. To see that f is harmonic we show that T ( / ' ) is perpendicular to S ( / ' ( P ) ) in R*, and then appeal to Proposition 5 B below. Namely, because T is flat we have 3
3
2
W
=
W
+
£
—
1
f
*
l
=
a
4
=
)
3
whence r(f)(P) is directed along the radius of S at f(P). On the other hand, T is not totally geodesic in 8 , for the map / : S -*T defined by /(6) = (0,0) is a geodesic of T ; it does not lie in any 2-plane through 0 in R*, and is therefore not a geodesic of 3 . I n particular, / : S —>T and f: T —*S are both harmonic maps, and their composition f'°f is not. 2
3
l
2
2
s
2
l
2
3
(B) PROPOSITION. / / f: M'-*M" is a Riemannian immersion, then for any map f: M-*M' we have E(f) =E(f°f). The tension field r(f) is the projection on M' of the tension field -r(f°f). Proof.
The first statement follows from the equation o
«(f /)-t
is
This generalizes the classical fact that a curve in M' is a geodesic if and only if its curvature vector in M" is always perpendicular to M'. ( C ) PROPOSITION. Let f:M'->M" be a Riemannian reducible fibration with totally geodesic fibres. Then for any map f: M—*M' we have Hf°n=r*(Hf))This is immediate, because we can in the present situation take split normal coordinates in Lemma 4 C .
25 HARMONIC MAPPINGS OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS.
133
COROLLAEY. If M = M" and f: M-*M' is a section, then f ° / = l is harmonic, and therefore T ( / ) is always vertical. Example. If we view a smooth r-form u> on M' as a section of the bundle 3 (M') of r-covectors of M', then the condition that ui be harmonic in the sense of de Rham-Hodge is generally different from the condition T(W) = 0 , rising (say) the Riemannian structure on S (M') of Sasaki [ 2 5 ] . However, these two concepts do coincide if M' is flat. lrl
[r]
Example. A map / : M M' X M" into a Riemannian product has a canonical decomposition f(P) = ( f (P), f (P)) for all PeM. Then / is harmonic if and only if both components /', f are harmonic. For instance, seee Proposition 2B. (D) Let us suppose that M' is a Riemannian submanifold of M" and that the imbedding is proper; i. e„ such that the inverse image of any compact subset of M" is compact in M'. Since M' is complete, there is a positive smooth function p : M' —> R such that for any P' £ M' the set {P"el£":
J
r {P\p")
gp(P')}
is geodesically convex in M"; if M' is compact, then of course we can suppose that p is a positive constant. For each P' £ M' let D - denote the closed ball of dimension q — m (q = dim M") consisting of all geodesic segments of length ^p(P') emanating from P' and perpendicular to M'(P'). The following result is well known and elementary. P
r
L E M M A . Let iV = U {Dp-: f € M ); then N is a neighborhood of M' in M", and the obvious map w: N —* M' defines a smooth fibre bundle over M' whose structure group is 0 . and whose fibres are closed balls. Q m
Taking into account Proposition 5 C we have the PROPOSITION. Let f: M'—*M" be a proper Riemannian imbedding and tr: N—>M' a normal tubular neighborhood. Then for any map f:M—*N the composition •wof is harmonic if and only if r(f) is vertical.
Chapter I I . Deformations of Maps. 6.
Deformations by the heat equation.
(A) This chapter is devoted to the fundamental problem of deforming a given map into a harmonic map; i.e., into a smooth map f:M-*M' satisfying the nonlinear elliptic equation
26 134
J A M E S E E L L S , J R . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
(1)
T(/)-0.
We begin by discussing general methods of attack. The interpretation given in § 2A of the tension field T ( / ) as the contravariant representative of the differential of E at / suggests that we try to invent gradient lines of E in a suitable function space of maps from M to if', and then to prove that these trajectories lead to critical points of E. We propose the following method for realizing such an attempt, which we now outline briefly. We do not pursue this method in the present paper, although the qualitative results are essentially those of the following sections. r
Let 9l {M,M') denote the function space of all maps from M to M' whose partial derivatives (relative to fixed coordinate coverings) of orders ^ T are square integrable. An inequality of Sobolev insures that if 2r > dim M then the maps in $l (M,M') are continuous, and its topology is larger than the uniform topology. It can be shown that the space 3l (M, M') admits an infinite dimensional Riemannian manifold structure modeled on a separable Hilbert space, and that E: 9t (M,M')-»R is a differentiable function. I f r is its gradient field on 9t {M,M'); i.e., V«E(f) < T (/)>»> for aU vectors v in the tangent space at /, then the ordinary differential equation r
r
r
f
T
t
has a local solution which is unique; furthermore, E(f ) is a decreasing function of t. Under suitable curvature restrictions the solutions are globally defined. I f each trajectory / is relatively compact, then it haB a limit point a harmonic map. Thus these trajectories define a canonical homotopy of the initial map onto a harmonic map; moreover, such trajectories enjoy the 1parameter group property. We observe that the critical points of E are just the zeros of all r (for any T > dim M / 2 ) . t
(
r
a
Now the function space 9i {M,M') is not a manifold, although with every map / we have the Hilbert space 9t°{f) of vector fields along / defined i n § 2 A . In particular, ° ( / ) — r ( / ) is in # " ( / ) . I n analogy with the above outline we are led to consider the nonlinear parabolic equation T
(2)
If—**/*}
((o<(
The study of this equation is our primary object in the foUowing sections. We will find that the properties of the trajectories of (2) include most of those mentioned as belonging to the trajectories of t* (2r > dimM). (There is one basic difference: The solutions of (2) are generally defined only for
HARMONIC MAPPINGS OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS.
135
r
non-negative time, whereas the trajectories of r are always defined for an open time interval around i = 0.) Remark. I n the calculus of variations a standard method (Morrey [ 1 9 ] ) of establishing the existence of a minimum of E for a given class of maps is to take the space M (M,M') and to introduce on it a weak topology relative to which 1 ) E is lower semi-continuous, and 2) there are sufficiently many compact sets. That approach works well for dim i f = 1 or 2; however, the example given in § 4 E shows that it will not work in general for n S 3. 1
(B) PROPOSITION. If ( i , P ) - » f , ( P ) is a map of (t ,t,)XM^M' which is C on the product manifold and C on M for each t, and if that map satisfies (2), then it is C. 0
1
!
We will refer to such an f as a solution of (2). t
This follows from Friedman [ 9 , Th. 4 and 5 ] provided the second derivatives fy of the f are Holder-continuous. But we can represent the local functions f by Green's formula, using the fundamental solution of the heat equation Au— du/dt = 0 as in § § 9 - 1 0 below. The required Holdercontinuity is then established by standard techniques from the properties of the potentials involved (Pogorzelski [24], Dressel [7], Gevrey [ 1 1 , No. 8 ] ) . 0
(C) Let ft: M^>M' satisfy (2) ; the subscript ( refers to the deformation parameter (we will always indicate explicitly differentiation with respect to t). Then from (4) of § 2 B we have
dt
J"
^ '' dt ^ !
M
SM I
dt
*1.
If D/dt denotes covariant differentiation along paths in M', then for each P € M the curvature veetor of the path i - » f ( P ) is given by D{df /dt)/dt. (
t
PROPOSITION. If ft- M-*M' satisfies (2), then the energy E(f ) is a strictly decreasing function; i.e., dE{f )/dt < 0 except for those values of t for which r(fi) = 0 . Furthermore, its second derivative expresses the average angle between the tension field and the curvature vectors of the deformation paths: t
t
LEMMA. If we let
Let f :M^W t
be an arbitrary deformation for
(£((„,ti).
28
136
J A M E S E E L L S , J R . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
then 1
dt
JM
9
^ftr'Vfl*/
2
P V « /
7
2
This follows from a direct calculation of d e{f )/St and an application of Green's divergence theorem. Because the first integral of the right member is always non-negative, we have on appeal to the above proposition the t
THEOREM.
If / , : M—*W satisfies the heat equation ( 2 ) , then
9
JM
2
dt
^dx* \dt/'
dx> V a * /
O) iff
Hi
2
2
In particular, if M' has non-positive sectional curvature, then d E{f,)/dt 3 0. If t is a value for which equality holds, then r{f,) is a covariant constant; i. e., dx* \
(2)
dt
J
:0 for all P£ M and ( l g i g n ) ,
COROLLARY. / / M' has non-positive sectional curvature and if f, satisfies for all i S i „ , then
at (D) We have seen in § 5 that in supposing M' contained in a larger manifold M" we do not alter the energy of a map / : M -> W. That suggests that we still have control of the energy and the tension of deformations of / which take place in a normal tubular neighborhood N of M' in M". If f: M'—*M" denotes the imbedding, then the induced tangent vector bundle is f- 3 (If) — 3 ( J f ) © *ft (M", W), where the second summand is the normal bundle of M' in M". Then 'ft. —» M' is Riemannian-conneeted in the sense of § 3 A . There ia a canonical vector field : N-^-'U covering the projection map ir: N-*M' defined by assigning to each Q" 6 N the unique vector (Q")eM"(v(Q")) such that exp, (p(Q")) =Q". Suppose now that ft'. M-±N is a smooth deformation ( i ^ i < f i ) . Then p ° / is a vector field on the map *•">/,, and using the harmonic integral l
P
P
tQn
0
t
29 HARMONIC MAPPINGS OP R I E M A N N I A N MANIFOLDS.
137
theory of § 3 applied to the vector bundle 9l —> M', we can define its Laplacean HP°U)-
Let
where D/dt is the covariant derivative in N along the path i r ° / . (
We now establish the following stability property of deformations. T H E O R E M . Let N be a normal tubular neighborhood of M' in M", and suppose that f : M^*N is a smooth deformation ( ( ^ ( < i ) . / / L{p°f ) is always horizontal in ff~ (M") and if /,„: M-*M', then f : M—>M' for all t ^ t < i, t
0
l
t
(
a
t
Proof.
lC
We apply Green's theorem to u, v € A"(M, {v°ft)~ fl)
•
J
*l= — I
The hypotheses imply that >°f L(p<> f,)y = 0 for all t, so that t!
o=
f
< °/,,A( °f )>*i— P
P
(
(
&*h^fc*fj$m..
Therefore * 4 f
f< °ftMp°f )>*i
P
— I.e.,
I
r
t
\d(p °f*)\**i
go.
z
| p o / ( i * l is a non-negative, non-increasing function of t, and it
is zero for t = t„. We conclude that p ° ft = 0 for all t g t < t precisely that every f maps M into M'. 0
lf
which states
t
7.
Global equations.
(A) We now occupy ourselves with the problem of replacing equations (1) and (2), which in terms of local coordinates on M and M' are local systems of equations, by some much more tractable global systems. Remark. Assume for the moment that we have an isometric imbedding w: M'-*Ri for some q, which we can always do by a theorem of Nash [21], Then as in Proposition 5B we find that equation (2) is satisfied for a deformation /(: M —> M' when and only when the composition W = w o f, satisfies the t
condition that the vectors LW, = A V T — a r e perpendicular to M'; see (
30 138
JAMES E E L L S , J H . AND J . H . SAMPSON. q
Lemma 7B below. When expressed in terms of tbe coordinates of R , that condition gives rise to a global parabolic system of equations of tbe type (2). On the other hand, the assumption of an isometric imbedding apparently affords no real simplification in our theory, and we will not make it. We proceed with an elementary imbedding convenient for our purposes. Suppose that M' is smoothly and properly imbedded in some Euclidean space Ri by a map w: M'^*R". LEMMA. Given such an imbedding of M' in K«, it is always possible to construct a smooth Riemannian metric g" = (g"a*)i£a,i£q on a tubular neighborhood N of M' so that N is Riemannian fibred. Proof. Let N be any tubular neighborhood of M' constructed using the Euclidean structure of R"; let IT: N—>M' be the projection map. It suffices to construct an appropriate smooth inner product in each space R (P') for all P' £ M', for we can translate that tangent space to any point Q'€ N along the straight line segment (necessarily contained in N) from P' = ir(Q') to Q'. We take g' in M'(P') and the induced Euclidean metric in the (Euclidean) orthogonal complement of M'(P') in K ( P ' ) , and take their sum in R « ( P ) . q
9
y
x
m
I n terms of local coordinates (y , • • • ,y ) on M' that metric can be described as follows: Write w(P') =• (w (P'),- • - ,vfl(P')); then l
c dw° Qw^
2k dy° ay
s
is the metric on M' induced from the Euclidean metric. Let i" be the unique solution of Z« dy
a
dy
B
3
~
V '
a
dw
fl
We have the duality relation -^^( " = Sa , and the metric tensor is 0
Then so that g" does induce g' on M'. For any vector veR"(P') %v"-— = 0 ( l ^ a S m ) we have ^,v't ^ 0 also, so that a-i oy a=i dw a
a
b
satisfying
31
HARMONIC MAPPINGS OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS.
139
Tims g" has the desired properties. (B) L E M M A . Let /,: M—*M' be any smooth deformation, and let W,: M-*N be the composition w°f = W . Then T ( / J ) =3/,/0f if and only if r(W )—dW /dt is perpendicular to M'(f (P)) for all P£M. t
t
t
t
t
Proof. The argument is essentially that of Proposition 5 B ; we choose local coordinates on M' and obtain ^ M / . ) * - f ) = ^ < w , ) ' - ^ f
I n terms of the coordinates of Ri the differential of the projection map IT: N—* M' has components *«?OK fdw . Its covariant differential in terms of the metric g" is a
=
^ The map : N-*R«
aSfc ~
r
"
a
o
A
/
(
1
=*
&
c
' =
9
)
•
defined {as in § 6 D ) by p(Q') =Q' — v(Q') assigns to
P
each Q' £ iV a vector perpendicular to M ' ( T T ( C ) ) , and pa" + o " = l r
V>
D
Pas'" + ™a& + r"o6" = 9. For its restriction to M' we obtain
where w ° = dvf/dy". For each a, the right member defines a vector perpendicular to M'; because the w " span the tangent space to M' in which they lie, we obtain the a
a
L E M M A . For any vectors u,v£M'(Q') ire p^Wv" is perpendicular to M'(Q'). LEMMA.
the vector whose components
For any map W,: M^*N with image in M' let £ be the vector
with components e^LWS—Tr^WtfW.W, where L = \ — 9/3f is the heat operator on M. Proof.
As in Proposition 5 B we have L{p{w )y^p/L(w y+^^w^w ^ t
t
l}
Then £ is tangent to M'.
32 140
JAMES B E L L S , J B . AND J . BT. SAMPSON.
(5)
But p(Wf) =0, whence the left member vanishes. the right member is a normal vector, we have
Since the second term in
It follows that
for l^d^g.
Thus J has normal component 0.
PROPOSITION. A map f: M-*M' position W = w°f satisfies
satisfies (1) if and only if the comi
(1)
AW°=* °w >w Y' ab
t
i
in terms of local coordinates on M. A deformation f : M~*M' W, — w°fi satisfies
(t < t < (,) satisfies (2) if and only if
t
a
1
(2)
LiW^^^'WtfWtjY
( i < t < (,). 0
Proo/. It suffices to establish tbe equivalence of (2) and (2). that we take any deformation f and compute
For
t
by the second perpendicular Conversely, if our equation must be 0.
(L(W y—
* <,°W 'W fg
t
a
ti
t
ci
y
>
lemma. I f IT, satisfies (2), then T { W ) ( P ) — dW,(P)/dt is to M'(f (P)), whence by the first lemma f satisfies (2). / , satisfies (2) and we define £ as in the third lemma, t h e n shows that £ ( P ) is perpendicular to ^ ' ( / i ( P ) ) , whence it (
t
t
(C) The following result is an application of Theorem 6D. I n order to have a proof avoiding the use of vector-bundle-valued harmonic forms, we can staTt with (5) and substitute (2) to obtain I (P (W,))
•
mt ( ~ ~ c
+ p T" <) C
AB
WteWtW,
a
using the projection relation p ir„ — it^p^. It follows that " - L( (W,))' so that a
P
P
= 0,
33 HARMONIC MAPPINGS OP R I E M A N N I A N MANIFOLDS.
141
2 -A< <wO)° = ^ 2 ( , { F , ) < r . P
P
Applying Green's identity (as in Theorem 6D) we find that i4f2(p(W )°) *l=-
f
2
(
az
jM
o
2
JM
and the conclusion follows: THEOREM. (
0
£ i < ti.
Let W : M->N
be a smooth deformation satisfying (3) for
t
If W 8.
to
maps M into M', then so does every TF { i = t < f
0
ti).
Derivative bounds for the elliptic case.
(A) Under suitable curvature and metric restrictions on M' we shall establish derivative estimates important for the solution of (1) and (3), or equivalently, of (1) and (3). Our starting point is the following result, essentially established in §3C.
LEMMA.
Any solution f, of (3) has energy density e(f ) t
satisfying
d t
(6)
11
-g'aBh-UfR , where fi{ft) is the fundamental form of ft and where R' py$ and R > are the components of the Riemannian curvature tensor on ffl* and of the contravariant Ricci tensor on M, respectively. ( B ) For the elliptic systems (1), (1) we invoke Green's formula for the operator A on M. Let r(P, Q) denote the geodesic distance between points P, Q of M. Since M is compact (without boundary), there is a constant a>0 such that r*(P,Q) is of class C™ for r*{P,Q) < 3a. Let
a
2
2
P
(
=
o
g
p
(
3
)
is a parametrix for the operator A, wheTe 1/n is (n—-3) times the surface of the unit (n — l)-sphere. (7)
«(P)= f JM
Green's formula is [u{Q)-A F(P,Q)-P(P,Q)-Au{Q)'\*l , Q
0
34 143
J A M E S E E L L 8 , J E . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
this holding for any function u(P) of class C on M (see Giraud [13], Bidalde Eham [ l ] ) . Consider now a solution of (1), and suppose that the Riemannian curvature of M' is non-positive. Prom (6), in which it is merely necessary to suppress the term de(f )/dt, there follows at once t
Ae(/)
—Re(/),
where R is a constant (independent of the solution in question). Since F(P, Q)^0 (a and
f JM
l*oF(P,Q)+R-F(P,Qne(f)(Q)*U-
By using the osculating Euclidean metric at a point of M one can show that | A F(P, Q) I const. X p(P> Q)'"* - Hence for some constant A, 2
Q
f JM
e(f)(P)^A
F(P,Q)e(f)(Q)*l . Q
Iterating this k— 1 times we obtain f JM
e(f)(P)^A*
F (P,Q)e(f)(Q)*l . k
Q
where the F are denned inductively by F = F and k
±
Fu(P,Q)
=
f F _ (P,Z)-F(Z,Q)*l JM k
l
(t>l).
z
If k > ft/2, then F is bounded (see Giraud [12]), and we have tbe foUowing k
THEOBEM. If M' has non-positive Riemannian curvature, then there is a constant 0 such that e(f) < C-E(f) for any harmonic mapping f: M—>M'. (C) Green's function G{P,Q) for A can be written in the form G{P,Q) =F(P,Q) -\-F'(P,Q), where F' is of class C" for P^Q and has a singularity of order lower than that of F for P^Q (Giraud [12], Bidalde Rham [1 ] ) . G [P, Q) is symmetric and of class C" f or P Q and satisfies A G(P,Q) =& G(P,Q) = V-\ where V is the volume of M. Green's formula (7), with G in place of F, is P
(8)
Q
f
«(P) = F - ' J
u(Q)*l-f
M
G(P,Q)-Au(Q)*l . 0
•/ M
Now let tj be a compact coordinate neighborhood on M, V its interior, and let P e U have coordinates (a; ,• • • ,x"). Write 1
3S HARMONIC MAPPINGS OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS. i
G (P,Q)=dG(P,Q)/dx ;
G (P,> =
i
143
r-G{P,Q)/dxW
U
Using normal coordinates on M one can show that there is a constant 0 such that | \ (9)
G^Q^^C-r(P,Q)-'^
|Gw(P,C)|^C-r(P,g)-» — Gi(Q,Z)\^C-r(P,Q) [r(P,Z)-''* a
I Gi(P,^)
1 a
1 a
+
r(Q,Z)-"' - ]
for P, Q G U, a being an arbitrary but fixed number with 0 < a < 1. If it is a solution of Au = f on M for some function /, then from (8) we have (for P£U) f
MP)
G (P,Z)
f(Z)*l .
i
z
JM Hence IMP)— for P,Qe.U.
f JM
MQ)\^
\G (P,Z)—G (Q,Z)\-\f{Z)\*U i
i
Using the last inequality of (9) we obtain
M wheTe
C = C-sup f JM
+,
Q
1
a
[r(P,?)-" - -f-r(g 2)-"* - ]*l . j
z
Suppose now that / is Holder-continuous with exponent a and Holder modulus M (f). I.e., Jl/ {f) = s u p I f(P) —f(Q)\-r(P,Q)- . It is a classical result a
a
a
M of potential theory that the function f G {P,Z)-[f(P )-f{Z)]*l JM l
0
(P,P 6t7)
z
0
has a derivative with respect to x> at the point P , given by 0
f JM
G (P ,Z)-[f(P )~f(Z}]*l , u
0
0
z
and by (9), this integral is majorized by 0-M (f)-
| JM
a
r(P ,Z)-"^*U. 0
On the other hand, the function
K
= 0.
is a constant, since
We conclude that
36 144
JAMES E E L I . S , J E . AND J . H . SAMPSON. i
(11)
\9*u/0t dxf\^C-M (f)
in U.
a
(This is an interior estimate of the type given by Hopf and Schauder (Hopf [ 1 4 ] , Schauder [26], Miranda [18]), but differs from them in that the magnitude of u is not involved.) (D) We apply these results to a harmonic mapping f:M—* the right member of ( 1 ) by F":
M'.
Denote
At this point we impose some boundedness conditions on the embedding of M' in R«, conditions which are automatically fulfilled if M' is compact. Namely we assume that , , | | ^ O, |W/aw" 1 g 0 on Jlf', ' Aids^^ds'^AzdsS, a
0
(
2
where C , At, A denote positive constants and where ds denotes the line element induced on M' by the usual metric in R'. Again let U be the interior of a compact coordinate neighborhood on M , and let P, Q be points of 13. From (12) and an elementary calculation involving the SchwaTZ inequality for quadratic forms and the equality e{f)P = g" W?W Y 0
2
0
,
ab
)
l
\F°(P)—F°(Q)\-r(P,Q)-> ( 1 3 )
a
^ B • [5 + # sup | Wf(P)—W (Q)\
-r(P,Q)
t
where B is a constant and e = e(f) —sup{e(f) ( P ) : P e M).
From (1) and
(10),
[ Wf(P) — Wf(Q) \-r(P,Q)-
a
^ C'sup I F" I, M
and plainly | F* | const. X e, in virtue of (12). of M there follows the estimate (14)
From the compactness
M (P=)gB'(e4-^) t t
for the Holder-modulus of F", B' denoting a constant. we have the
Referring to (11),
T H E O R E M . Suppose that M' satisfies the embedding conditions (12). Let U(x\ • • • ,x ) be the interior of a compact coordinate neighborhood on M. Then there is a constant C such that n
t
\d W/dx*d^\^C(Hf)
+ « ( / ) * ) in U,
(IgaSj),
37 HARMONIC MAPPINGS
OF R I E M A N N I A N
for any harmonic mapping f: M—*M'
Z
MANIFOLDS.
145
where e(f) = sup{e (/) (P) : P e ¥ } .
Remark. We point out that second derivative estimates can be obtained from linear theory in another way. Namely, if we write our equation (1) in the form c
c
e
&W + A >W,>' = 0, where A / J =
i
—ir Wfg i,
b
ab
then we have a linear system with bounded coefficients (in compact coordinate neighborhoods), by Theorem 8B. A Holder-modulus for the W* will then give us a Holder-modulus for the coefficients of the linear system, and we can apply Theorem 1 of Douglis and Nirenberg [6] to deduce second derivative estimates and analogous estimates on all higher derivatives as well. The second derivative estimates we obtain here are somewhat sharper, in certain respects; i. e., they do not involve a priori estimates on the magnitudes of the solutions W. 0
9.
Bounds for the parabolic case.
(A) We now embark upon some analogous computations for the operator £ = A — d/dt. The function !
(15)
2
X ( P , a ( ) = {2V^)-^-'" exp(- (P,g)/40 P
is a parametrix for the operator L (p* as in the preceding paragraph). Put jV,(P, Q, i) =L K(P, P
Q, t) = (\ -dfdt)K{P,
Q, t)
P
and N (P,Q,*)= t
f
f'dr
N^P^J
— T)-N{Z,Q, )*U T
(k>l).
It is well known that there exists a fundamental solution H for the heat operator L on any compact Riemannian manifold M, which can be expressed in the form (16)
H(P,Q,t)=K{P,Q,t)+
f- drf
K(P,Z,t
—
T)-N(Z,Q,T)*lz,
where N(P,Q,t)=i.N*{P,Q,t). (See Milgram-Rosenbloom [ 1 7 ] , Pogorzelski [34]). The function H(P, Q, t) is symmetric in P, Q and is positive. I t is of class C" except for P = t = 0;
10
38 146
J A M E S E E L L S , J H . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
and it satisfies L H(P,
Q, t) = L S{P,Q,t)
P
=0.
Q
Its spectral decomposition
is B(P,Q,t)
= F ^ + £esp(— m
Kt)
where the A„ are the non-zero eigenvalues of A, the
f'dr
u(P,t)
Ji*
(17)
+
f
f JM
— T) LU(Q,T)*1
H(P,Q,t
JM H(P,Q,t
0
— U) u(Q,t0)*lQ
(U
z
this holding for any function u(P, t) on M which IB of clasB C in P and C in ( for t ^ t 0
< tt.
( B ) Suppose now that we have a solution / : M—*M' of (2) defined in 0 < f < i j , and let M' have non-positive Riemannian curvature. According to Lemma 8A we have then Le(f,) 3 — Re(f ), R being a positive constant (independent of the solution in question). Since H > 0, there follows from (17) (
t
(18)
f'dr
e(f,)(P)^R
f
•ft*
+
H(P,Q,t—r)e{f )(Q)*lQ T
JM
6 (f )(P) a
t
where (19)
f
*>(/*)(P)=
ff(P,Q,i-M«(/«.)(e)*lo
"'AT
and 0 < in < ( < i , . Iterating (18) &— 1 times we obtain
(20) f dr
+ e (f,)(P)+iRa
f
ff,(P,g,t
—T)< (/ )(Q)*le, e
T
where the Et are defined by H = E and t
H (P,Q,t) k
Cd, f
= J
a
J
BMP^S—*)£(Z,&4*li
(fc>l).
M
From the integral representation it can be shown (see Pogorzelski [24]) that E(P,Q,t)
<j const. X £ - " r ( F Q ) )
n+2a
(O^(gl).
1
39 HARMONIC MAPPINGS OP RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS.
147
where a is an arbitrary but fixed positive number less than 1. Therefore H is bounded for k > « / 2 ( 0 £ < £ 1,ft > 1 ) . Consider now our solution / for ( > 1. (
s
rutting (— 1 for f in (30) 0
we have e ( / , ) ( P ) g const.
('>1T t _ I
(SI)
J
f i'(fr)
K>)*1
m
+ S « p t f o ( / r ) ( P ) - [ l + 2 i ? ' C
f
H„(P,g,r)*l ]. 0
For tbe case at band, e is given from (19) by 0
«.(/.) (J*) Since H(P,Q,
f
//{P.V.ii
^/^KO-io.
1) is bounded, we have 6,(ft) (P) g const.
Recalling that j
« ( f ) (<2)*1 M
0
«•(/») ( £ ) is a decreasing function, we obtain finally from
(?1) e(f,) (P) ^ const, f
C<3)*J
(«>!)•
Auy smaller value can be put in for t —• 1 on the right, for example zero if e(f,)(P) is continuous at 1 = 0. Making that assumption, we now obtain an estimate for the range Q ' £ g i 2 | i . I n (20) we now put t„ — 0, getting (821
e(f,) ( P ) £ const. [ f'.ir o
f *S
-U
where now wo have
JM and where <•„(/,) = sup{<\,(/,) (P) : P € -V} : we define e(f ) similarly. But this function is precisely the solution of £<\, = 0 that reduces at i = 0 to *(/o) {.$)• From general principles it follows that ( ' , ( / i ) ( P ) ^ c ( / i ) for / ^ 0 , and so (?'?) gives at once t
e(f,) ( P ) g const. c(f ) 0
(Ogfgl).
We have then the TUKORKM. Let f,:M-*H' le a family of mappings for 0 5£ f < fi satisfying ("-') for 0 < < < / j and ••>urh that the energy density e(f,)(P) is
40 148
J A M E S E H L L 8 , J E . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
continuous at I
0. Suppose that M' has non-positive Riemannian curvature.
Then e(f )(P)^0-f t
J
and
M
e(f )(Q)*l
j o r t ^ K h
a
a(ii)(P)^o-8up{6(/ )() • QeM}
for
0
o^;sl,
0 denoting a constant which does not depend on the particular solution ft of (5). Remark. Under certain circumstances much sharper estimates can be obtained. With the hypotheses of the preceding theorem, assume further that the Ricci tensor of M is positive definite at every point. From (6) it is clear that de(fi)/dt^-—Ae(ft) at any maximum point of e(/i) on M, A denoting a positive constant. I t follows easily that e(/,) (P) ^ const, e . A t
1
n
(C) Now let (a; ,' • *,x ) be the coordinates of P in the interior U of a compact coordinate neighborhood 0 on M. And suppose that our solution of (2) and the first-order space derivatives are continuous at fl — 0. Then from (2), (17) we have W '(P) =
W°(P,t)
t
- - C ' d r f H(P,Q,t- )-F>(Q,T)*U Jo JM
(23)
T
=
+
W '(P,t) t
V°(P,t)+W ><(P,t), 0
where m
m
®
f
-
E(p,Q,t)w(Q,Q)*u,
JM the F"{P, t) being the functions on the right of (2). The first integral V"(P, t) has Holder continuous first-order space derivatives (Pogorzelski [23], Theorem 5 ) : | V '(P t) t
1
— V «{P', t') | ^ const, sup \ F°\ - \r{P, P')° -f-1 f _ < * | « » ] t
(
a being an arbitrary positive number less than 1, the points P and P' both in U. I f we continue with the assumption (12), we shall have | F" | ^ const. X «• The integral W °(P, t) can be differentiated under tbe integral sign (for t > 0) and the derivatives tend exponentially to zero, as is quickly seen from the spectral formula for H. Hence, if the hypotheses of Theorem 9U hold, it follows that the functions W (P, t) have first-order space derivatives which 0
C
41 HARMONIC MAPPINGS OF R I E M A N N I A N MANIFOLDS.
149
are Holder-continuous in P, t, uniformly so for t 5; « > 0:
a
gconst. [e(/ ) 4-sup I W ( ( ? , 0 ) | ] • [r(P,P') M
+ | i — i ' WSJ,
0
(The constant depends upon t because of the behavior of W "(P,t) small t.) 0
for
Referring to (13) we see that (
M
\F'(P,t)-F'(Q,t)\-r(P Q)-
)
>
g const. B ( / ) [1 + «(/„)* + fi«P I W°(Q,0) |] 0
forig*>0. Now from (17) it is clear that (
dr f
H(P, Q, t — T)$(T)*1
q
is a
Jo JM function of t alone for arbitrary ip. Hence for the second derivatives F ( P , i ) = d*V (P,t)/dx fc' we can write c
e
l
( i i
f 'dTf H(P,Q,t-T)[F°(P r)--F<(Q,T)-\*l .
F,,(jV)=a^7
a
M
ni
9
From (Pogorzelski [24], Tb. 3) this is V °{P t)= u
t
('dr
f JM
./ f-e
Jo
Jo
ff . (P,g,i- )[P"(P , )-P"(g r)]*l i i
T
0 T
f
where we assume f ^ 2 * > 0 . The integral I is improper but uniformly convergent. Now | H^P, Q, t) | < const. X frfy{P,Q)- -™ (arbitrary 8, 0 < £ < 1 ) . Using (24) and putting P = P„ in I (we assume ( P ^ e P ) , we obtain an absolutely convergent integral if a, 8 are chosen properly, and there results x
n
B
t
\U\<
e
o^t. e(/„) [1 + sup | W°(Q,0) | - f e(/„)*] if C ^ 2*, Af
since then T in J , will be £ f . For I we have | H-i,j{P, Q,t) \ < const, erW for some positive y and for f ^ e > 0. Hence z
• i-e t-t -7('-T) oV
X
E
c
< const, sup | F | < const. e{f ), 0
using Theorem 9B.
42 150
JAMES E E L L S , J R . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
T H E O R E M . Suppose that M' satisfies the imbedding conditions (13). Let ft satisfy the conditions of Theorem 9B, and let (x ,- • • ,x ) be the coordinates of a point P in the interior of a compact coordinate neighborhood U on M. Given t > 0, there is a constant C, independent of the solution f of (2), such that 1
n
t
c
d*W (P,t) dx^x' for i^t,
0)\:Q£M}
< C e(f ) [ 1 + gtf )» + BupfJ W'(Q, 0
0
where e(f ) — sup{e(f ) (P) : P € M}. 0
0
Semarh.
Since I H{P,Q,t)*lQ is a constant, the functions W"(Q,0) JM appearing in the foregoing estimates can be altered by arbitrary additive constants without affecting the validity of the estimates. For example, one could replace W"(Q, 0) by the function minus its average value, say W , with the result that the term sup | W (Q,0)\ in Theorem 9C would be replaced by sup| TP"(Q,0) — W«\. c
a
10.
Successive approximations.
(A) Let W(P,t) and W'(P,t) be two solutions of (2) in 0^t
0
W ( P , ( ) — W">(P,t)
f ' dr f H (P, Q, t - r) CNft r) - tf* (Q, r) ] *1 , 0
Jo
•*M
c
where F" F' are the respective right members of (2). }
Z(t)
= s u p | W°(P,t)—
Set
W'°(P,t)\
M,c e
+ [sup(W —W '°) (Wf— t
{
W'iBtni.
M,B c
c
U(t) =e(f )
+e(r.)
From the constitution of F and F' it is easily verified (by an argument similar to that foT (13)), account taken of (12), that \F»—F"°\
+ *(/,)» + a
Hf>)y
For 0 £ ( g l we can write E(P,Q,t)
43
HARMONIC MAPPINGS OP R I E M A N N I A N MANIFOLDS.
151
where in the latter the constant depends upon the particular choice of local coordinates x . of course. Now let A denote an upper bound for the quantity U(t) in some fixed time interval 0 g t f = i . From the integral expression above there follows easily, for \ < a < 1, i
2
X(t)
< const. X A J ' {t —
and we conclude that X(t)
r)-"X{T)d
T!
vanishes for small t.
Hence the
T H E O R E M . Let f, and ft be two solutions of (3), both continuous along with their first-order space derivatives at ( = 0. If fo = fo, then the two solutions coincide for all (relevant) t > 0. COROLLARY.
Any solution of ( 2 ) enjoys the semi-group property along
the trajectory of each point P £ M.
That is, if we write ft[P) = T, (f ) , then
T (U)=T (f )=Tt(T (f )). UT
t
T
T
0
( B ) For tbe solution of ( 2 ) we now turn to the system of non-linear integro-differential equations ( 2 3 ) associated with ( 2 ) . 1
Let / : M - » M' be a mapping of class C , given by global mapping functions T P = ( W V •
W).
For v ^ O define W'=
W°-(P,f)= f Jit
(25)
{W--\- • • ,W'^)
by
H(P,Q,t)W°(Q)*l
Q
and C
W" (P, t) (26)
=
— C dr f HiPtQ^—^-F'-^iQ^^U Jo JM
+
W^iP^),
where b
F-"{P,t)
ii
=ir °(W)-W r-«W - g , ab
t
)
the functions TTab" as in ( 2 ) . Set y = sup [ 2 WV^TF/'V']*v
From ( 2 6 ) Wf<(P,t) (27)
f'
Jo
dT
C n (P,Q,i JM t
—
r)-F*-^(Q,r)*lQ+W^(P,t),
44 152
J A M E S B E L L S , J E . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
where the subscript i denotes differentiation with respect to a system of local coordinates x* at P. We recall the estimate I
a
Q,t)\<
At~ r{P, Q)-"-^<*
( 0 ^ i ^ l ; i < « < l ) ,
A denoting a constant which depends in general on the local coordinate system. Now let B denote an upper bound for the quantities | w b | in some compact neighborhood V of the image f(M) in the tubular neighborhood N C R«. I f W- €. U' for 0 g t% t, then from (27) we conclude that 0
a
1
where C is a constant which does not depend upon the given mapping f. Put y — sup y r
O^i^t,
n
Then y < Kt-oy^ v
a
1 0
If K^- g^
1
S £ and Ke - ^
+ y*,
K = BG/(1 — *).
% £, then
From a transparent induction it follows that, for sufficiently small positive *, we shall have W(P,
a
() 6 V and y„ ^ ^K^~ for 0 g * g t, y = 0,1,2, • •
In particular, the defining equation (26) makes sense for all v, provided Now put e
X „ ( i ) — sup I W- (P, f)
W - ^ ^ P , f) I 1
fl
• f [sup(W^= —W^" '") (Wy- — W y - ^ f l * ' ] ! . From the definition above, j^.e—j'F-i.n._,
W o f t 0
( r p » - i ) ( 1 F ^ » 1 P ^ I > — Wf-i*Wf-%.b)
gti
+ [».»"(W) — ^ " ( T F ' - ^ l W ^ W j - V ' . We can suppose that the constant B occurring above is also an upper bound for the quantities | d-n „ /dw | in the neighborhood IT. The preceding formula c
a
d
45
HARMONIC MAPPINGS OF BIEMANNLAN MANIFOLDS.
153
then gives us | p > - J W * | < C'BZ (y P
P
+
+
C a constant independent of the given mapping /. Hence, | F^ — F'- -"1 < G'BXill/K*-* 1
2
+ 1/4SV- "]
From (36), (27) and the estimates cited for H(P,Q,t) obtain f Z„(r)
X^{t)
=C"Z (t). v
and ff (P,Q,tO we (
a
((-T)- dr
(0g^ ), t
Thus if
X„(i) ^ s u p Z ^ r )
(O^rgi),
then
and so the series
0
converges for all sufficiently small (. This shows that our successive approximations W* and their first-order space derivatives converge uniformly on M (for small t). Hence, the F"- also converge. Set W" = lim W' and F" = lim¥"•" ( c — » » ) . Thus W'(P,t) has continuous first-order space derivatives Wi' (for sufficiently small t, of course), and W / —> WV (?—»a>), so that C
C
,e
J*>(P,^^(rfjTf^y). From (26) there follows at once (28)
W(P,t)
f'dr
f
3(P,Q,t
Jo
— T)-F°(Q,T)*l
Q
+
W°-°[P,t).
JM We conclude that the functions W have Holder-continuous first order space derivatives—uniformly Holder-continuous for any small elosed (-interval not containing zero. Therefore the functions F " ( P , t) are Holder-continuous with respect to the space variable, and so tbe functions W° of (28) satisfy equation (2) for all positive t in the interval in which the successive approximations converge (see Pogorzelski [24]). The ff" are moreover visibly cone
46 154
JAMES EEIXB, JE. AND J . EI. SAMPBON.
tinuous with their first order space derivatives at (— 0, and W"(P, 0) = W(P). From Theorem 7C we recall that the point W(P,t) — (W ,- • • ,W*) must lie on the manifold M' for all t in the interval of convergence. 1
THEOREM. Let M" be a compact subset of M'. Then, for any continuously differentiate mapping f:M^M' such that f(M) lies in M", there is a positive constant i , depending only on M" and the energy density e(f) such that (2) has a solution f, for O g ( g d which is continuous at ( = 0, along with its first order space derivatives, and which coincides with f at t = d. It only remains for us to inquire into the length of the (-interval for which the successive approximations converge. First of all, the upper bound B for | ir ," | and j (hatf/dm* | figuring in the foregoing proof can be taken once for all to be valid in some neighborhood U" of M". Therefore the constant K can be fixed, and a as well, of course. The < must satisfy Kf ~ y £ J , and to see what this entails we must look briefly into y„. Consider then a solution u of the heat equation on M, as a map u: M—*R. We suppose that u and its first order space derivatives are continuous at ( = 0. The argument of Theorem 9B holds in this situation. If we put p^g uiu, , then p(P, t) ^ Csupfp (Q, 0) : Q € M], where C is a constant depending only on M. Applying this to the functions W , we conclude that there is a constant C\ such that y„ < C\ • e(f). Thus < depends only on M" and the magnitude of e(f), and the same is true of the quantity C" involved in the estimates of the X . The assertion of the theorem then follows at once from those estimates. In § 2B we described the harmonic character of C maps in terms of their tension fields. For C maps we have the ai
l
a
a
il
j
0,c
v
1
1
COEOLLAEY. Let f: M—*M' be a continuously differentiate mapping for which the energy is a minimum with respect to small variations. Then f is harmonic. For let ft be the corresponding solution of (3) guaranteed by the preceding theorem. The energy E (/,) is continuous at ( = 0 and by assumption it must be non-decreasing for small (. But E{f,) is always non-increasing, so that dW/dt^O for small t. Thus (2) reduces to (1). (C) THEOEEM. Suppose that M' has non-positive Riemannian curvature, and that it satisfies the embedding restrictions (12). Then for any continuously differenliuble mapping f: M—*M' there is a unique solution f,
47 harmonic
mappings of
riemannian manifolds.
155
of (2), defined for all t^Q, which is continuous along with its first order space derivatives at t — 0 and which coincides with f at t = 0. Such a solution exists for small t, by Theorem 10B, and it is unique, by Theorem 10A. Let t, be the largest number such that a solution of the required sort exists for 0 f§ t < t„ and supposes that t± is finite. From Theorem 9B it is clear that the right members of (28) cannot become unbounded for O g i < ( i and consequently the images fi{M) (0^(<(,) all lie in a compact subset of M'; we recall that M' is always assumed to be complete. On the other hand, Theorem 9B shows that the energy density e(f,) remains bounded, and therefore by Theorems 10A and 10B there is a fixed positive number such that any f, can be continued as a solution of (2) into the interval ((,14-<,). This contradicts the definition of (D) If W is not compact, then solutions of (2) may very well become unbounded as t —*oo, as in the Example. Let M' be tbe manifold obtained by revolving the graph of a positive strictly decreasing smooth function v = v(u) around the u-axis; let <> / denote the revolution angle. For a map / : S —» M' of a circle S parametrized by the central angle 0 our heat equation is 1
H 3t dt
=
v'v" 1 + (v')
2 +
M-
2
+
/3uV \d&)
1
vv' 1+{»')*
(HY W
v 86 di) '
If / satisfies initial conditions du/d8 = 0,
I u
du e" 4- 1 St ~ e 4-1 * Ju
Thus e" 4- u — 2 logic" 4- 1) = ( 4 - const.; in particular, u—>oo as t—>w. We note in passing that there are no non-trivial closed geodesies on W, so that there are no harmonic representatives in any non-trivial homotopy classes of maps S —» AT. The following result shows that solutions must remain bounded if M' satisfies certain conditions at infinity. 1
48 156
J A M E S E E L L S , J E . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
THEOREM. Let M' be as in the preceding theorem and suppose further that j w | •TTab'tw) —» 0 uniformly as \ w j —>oo, where \ w | = sup \w°\. Then 0 every solution of (2) is bounded. Set W(t) = sup| W"(P,t)\,
W(t) = inf I W°(P, t)\,
c
U(t) =
2
f 2 (W ) *l.
In virtue of Theorem 9B, the difference W(t) — W(i) is bounded. Hence if our solution is unbounded as (-»<», then that is true of all three of the quantities above. Supposing that to be the case, let us denote by A& the set of all ( for which U(t) > fc. The Aj are then all non-empty and each As must contain at least one t = t at which dU/dt^.0. Now from (2) we have k
2 W°AW — 2 o
o
-n at
c
1
2 W Tr ° WfWjY ab
Hence by Green's Theorem idU/dt=—
f (gradW) *l — 2 f WV^W^W.VM. •J M aJ M 2
For large values of f* we have a plain contradiction, since the right-hand side must be negative. 11.
Harmonic mappings.
(A) We can now apply some of the results established above to prove the existence of harmonic mappings, even though we do not know whether the solutions of the parabolic system (2) converge in general as t—»oo. THEOEEM. Let M' have non-positive Riemannian curvature and let f :M—*M' be a bounded solution of (2), 0 < i < o > . Then there is a sequence d, U, t , • • • of t-values such that the mappings f, converge uniformly, along with their first order space derivatives, to a harmonic mapping f. t
a
k
From Theorems 9B and 9C it is clear that the mappings / , and their first order space derivatives form equicontinuous families. Hence there exists a sequence t„ t - • • such that the mappings f — f, converge uniformly, with their first order space derivatives, to a continuously differentiable mapping f. From (2) and (8) we can represent the f by the formula S!
k
k
k
49 HARMONIC MAPPINGS OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS.
157
c
where as usual F stands for the right member of ( 2 ) . Now fix c and temporarily put
X
dW-
The dW{P, t )/dt are bounded as &-»oo, by Theorems 9B and 9C, and so the u and their first derivatives are bounded. Hence the u form an equicontinuous family, and we can suppose that the sequence t t ,- • • is chosen so that the u converge uniformly, say to u. Now let (?„ denote the i>-th iterate of the Green's function G. We have k
k
k
l7
2
k
f G,(P,e)«(G)*l=lim f J M
G»{P,Q)u (Q)*\ k
h J M It J M
0,1
If v 4 - l > f i / S , then G is bounded. But the dW'(P, t )/dt the mean to zero as h—*oo, by Corollary 6C. Thus W 1
converge in
k
r
G»(P,Q)u(Q)*l
= 0,
J M
and so u = 0 because of the positive-definite character of G. Therefore, passing to the limit in the equation above, we get for the limit mapping f the formula
where
T P « ( P ) = 7 - » j" W'(Q*i— f G(P,Q) JM JM e
F (Q)—\imF»( Q, k L
h)
F<(Q)*1 , 0
=- '(W)WfWW. rM
C
From this it follows (as in § 1 0 B ) that W (P) has Holder-continuous first derivatives, and therefore f" is Holder-continuous. Consequently the W(P) satisfy (1). COROLLARY. Let M ' have non-positive Riemannian curvature and let f: M M ' he a continuously differentiate mapping. Let f, be the solution of (2) which reduces to f at ( = 0. / / / , is bounded as t—>oo, then f is homotopic to a harmonic mapping f for which E(f') ^E(f). In particular, if M ' is compact or satisfies the conditions of Theorem 10D, then every continuous mapping M—>M' is homotopic to a harmonic mapping.
50 158
JAMES EELLS, JR. AND J . H. SAMPSON. COROLLARY. If M' is compact and has non-positive Riemannian curvature,
then every homotopy class of mappings M—* M' contains a harmonic mapping whose energy is an absolute minimum. For in any homotopy class we can choose a minimizing sequence of harmonic mappings f ft, etc., by the preceding corollary. From Theorems 8B and 8D it follows that we can select a subsequence (same notation) which converges uniformly along with first derivatives to a continuously differentiable mapping /. Then E(f) = lim.E(ft), and f is harmonic by Corollary 10B. u
(B) THEOREM. Let M have non-negative Ricci curvature and let M' have non-positive Riemannian curvature. Suppose that M' is compact or that it satisfies the conditions of Theorem 10D. Then any continuous map f: M^*M' is homotopic to a totally geodesic map. Furthermore, 1) if there is at least one point of M at which its Ricci curvature is positive, then every continuous map from M to M' is null-homotopic; 2) if the Riemannian curvature of M' is everywhere negative, then every continuous map from M to M' is either null-homotopic or is homotopic to a map of M onto a closed geodesic of M'. This is a combination of Theorem 3C and Corollary l l A . COROLLARY. Let M be a compact smooth manifold admitting a Riemann structure g with non-positive Riemannian curvature. Then M does not admit any Riemannian structure g with non-negative Ricci curvature unless that curvature vanishes everywhere. 1
Proof. It suffices (by passing to the two leaved orientable cover if necessary) to consider the case that M is orientable. I f there were such a metric g, then the identity man (M, g) —> (M, g') would be homotopic to a totally geodesic map. That map has degree one, and therefore M cannot have any point of positive Ricci curvatuie relative to g. Remark. A special case of Theorem 11B (Part 1) can be obtained without the use of harmonic theory. Namely, assume 1) that M has positive Ricci curvature everywhere; then by a theorem of S. Myers [30], the fundamental group ^ ( j y . w i ) is finite;
51
HARMONIC
MAPPINGS
OF RIEMANNIAN
MANIFOLDS.
159
2 ) that M' is anr complete Riemannian manifold with non-positive Riemannian curvature. Then the homotopy groups m!) = 0 for t ^ l , and •w,(M',m'} has no elements of finite order. It is well known that the homotopy classes of maps of any arcwise connected space 11 into are in natural 1-1 correspondence with the conjugacy classes of homomorphisms 7r,{Jf, m) —>ir,(il', m'). But clearly in the situation at hand every such homomorphism is trivial, whence every continuous map M —* Zl' is null homotopic. COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, T H E JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, T H E INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STTDY.
REFERENCES.
[I] [2]
P. Bidal and G. de Rham, ' ' L e a formes differentielles harmonique," Commentarii Mathematici Helvetia, vol. 19 (1946-71, pp. 1-49. S. Bochner, ''Harmonic surfaces in Riemannian metric," Transactions of the
[3]
American Mathematical Society, vol. 47 (1940 J , pp. 146-154, , "Analytic mappings of compact Riemann spaces onto Euclidean space,"
[4]
Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 3 11937), 339-354. , " C u r v a t u r e and Betti numbers in real and complex vector hundles," Ren-
diconti del Seminario Mateniatico di Torino, vol. 15 (1955-0), pp. 225-2-53. 15] C . Chevalley, Lie Groups I. Princeton, 1946. [6] A . Douglis and L . Xirenberg. "Interior estimates for elliptic systems of partial differential equations," Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 8 (1955), pp. 503-538. [71 P. Dressel, " T h e fundamental solution of the parabolic equation I , " Duke matical Journal, vol. 7 (1940 ) , pp. 186-203. [8] L . P . Eisenhart, Riemannian Geometry. Princeton, 1926.
Mathe-
[9] A. Friedman, " I n t e r i o r estimates for parabolic systems of partial differential equations," Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, vol, 7 (1958), pp. 393-418. [10] F . B . F u l l e r , "Harmonic mappings," Proceedings of the Xational Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., vol. 40 (19541, pp. 987-991. [11] M. Gevrey, " S u r les equations aux derivees partielles du type parabolique," Journal de Mathematiques et Appliquees, b. 6, vol. 9 (1913), pp. 305-475, G. Giraud, " S u r le probleme de Dirichlet generalise," Annates de I'Ecole Normale Huperieure, vol. 46 (1929), pp. 131-245. [13] R . Hermann, "A sufficient condition that a map of Riemannian manifolds be a [12]
fibre bundle," Proceedings (1960), pp. 236-242.
of the American
Mathematical
Society,
vol. 11
52 160
JAMES EELLS,
J R . AND J . H . SAMPSON.
[14] E . Hopf, " TJber lien funktionalen, insbeaondere den analytischen Character der Losungen elliptiacher Different! algleichungen zweiter Ordnung," Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 34 (1931), pp. 194-233. [15] A . Liehnerowicz, " Quelquea theoremes de geometrie differentielle globale," Commentarii Mathematici Belvetid, vol. 22 (1949), pp. 271-301. [16] C . Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Oxford, 1892. [17] A . Milgram and P. Rosenbloom, "Harmonic forma and heat conduction I , " Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., vol. 37 (1951), pp. 180-184. [18] G. Miranda, Equazioni alle Derivate Paraiali di Tipo Ellittiao, Berlin, 1955. [19] C . B . Morrey, " T h e prohlem of Plateau on a Riemannian manifold," Annals of Mathematics, vol. 49 (1948), pp. 807-851. [20] S. Myera, " Riemannian manifolds with positive mean curvature," Duke matical Journal, vol. 8 (1941), pp, 401-404.
Mathe-
[21] J . Nash, " T h e imbedding problem for Riemannian manifolds," Annals of Mathematics, vol. 63 (1956), pp. 20-64. [22] I . Petrovsky, " O n the analytic nature of solutions of systems of differential equations," M atematiieskiy Sbornik, vol. 47 (1939), pp. 3-70. [23] W. Pogorzelaki, " Propriatea des integrates da l'equation parabolique normale," Annates Polonici Mathematici, vol. 4 (1957), pp. 61-92. [24]
, " E t u d e de la solution fondamentale de l i q u a t i o n parabolique," Ricerche di Matematica, vol. 5 (1956), pp, 25-56. [25] S. Sasaki, " O n the differential geometry of tangent bundles of Riemannian manifolds," Tohoku Mathematical Journal, vol. 10 (1958), pp. 338-354. [26] J . Schauder, " Numerische Abschitzungen in elliptischen linearen Differentialgleichungen," Studia Mathematica, vol. 5 (1934), pp. 34-42. [27] D . Spencer, Mimeographed notes, Princeton University.
A n n . Inst. Fourier, Grenoble 14, 1 (1964), 61-70.
ENERQIE ET DEFORMATIONS EN QEOMETRIE DIFFERENTIELLE (') par James E E L L S , Jr. et J . H . SAMPSON (Columbia University et Strasbourg.)
1. Introduction.
De meme qu'une fonction reelle definie sur une variete entraine une decomposition (cf. theorie de Morse) de son domaine (sous certaines hypotheses, bien entendu), une fonctionelle definie sur un espace d'appiications peut donner lieu a une decomposition agreable de celui-ci moyennant certains systemes differentiels associes a la fonctionnelle. Les methodes principales sont la theorie des varietes differentiables de dimension infinie et la theorie des semi-groupes dans les espaces hilbertiens. Ici nous voulons donner une breve description de ces methodes telles qu'elles se presentent dans 1'etude de certains problemes geometriques du calcul des variations sur les varietes riemanniennes. Pour notre formulation nous avons profile de plusieurs conversations avec MM. S. Smale et A. H. Taub. 2. Un probleme general.
Dans ce paragraphe nous voulons esquisser une formulation du calcul des variations adaptee a une classe tres etendue de problemes qui font intervenir des derives d'ordre superieur d'inconnues dont le domaine est une variete difTerentiable (') Ce travail a fite finance partiellement par la National Science Foundation (U.S.A.) et l ' U . S . A r m y Research Office (Durham).
54 62
JAMES E E L L S ,
J R . E T J . H . SAMPSON
donnee. Parmi les problemes que nous envisageons certains sont obtenus par un procede d'iteration, done forcement des problemes d'ordre superieur. Le langage des espaces fibres est le plus naturel pour notre formulation. Soit X une variete riemannienne compacte. Pour ecarter des complications nous la supposerons orientee, sans bord, et de classe C". Soit ^ : V —>• X un fibre difTerentiable sur X ayant comme fibre une variete difTerentiable, et notons J (%) —*• \ lefibredesft-jetsde sections de \ (on ecrira \ tantot pour V, tantot pour 1'espace fibre tout entier). Par densite wariationnelle d'ordre k sur £ nous entendons une fonction difTerentiable / : J*(ij) -> R. Une section suffisamment difTerentiable f du fibre S; determine d'une facon evidente une section f' de J*^); et en appliquant a celle-ci la densite f on obtient une Tonction reelle f(f') sur la variete X. L'integrale de cette fonction, etendue sur X moyennant sa structure riemannienne, sera notee Iy(tp). Done L peut etre considere comme fonctionelle sur une classe donnee V de sections suffisamment differentiables de !;. Le choix de T joue un role important. Avec un choix convenable et sous des hypotheses raisonnables sur la densite / (convexite, par exemple), la fonctionnelle L determinera par ses varietes-niveau une decomposition de son domaine V, decomposition cependant beaucoup plus delicate dans le cas des espaces fonctionnels que dans le cas des varietes ordinaires. II n'est guere besoin d'insister sur sa relation etroite avec la theorie de M. Marston Morse. Les fonctionnelles L que 3'on vient de deerire ont une grande importance pour plusieurs problemes de l'analyse globale et de la geometrie differentielle. Nous en verrons quelques exemples plus loin. Precisons maintenant les espaces fonctionnels que nous voulons considerer. Pour chaque entier ft(0 ^ k < oo) notons C*(!j) 1'espace des sections de classe C* du fibre !;, et notons H(!;) 1'espace des sections de !j dont les derivees d'ordre <J r (par rapport a un systeme de cartes sur X) sont de carre sommable. On munit ces espaces des topologies evidentes. Si r > n/2 + ft, n designant la dimension de X, chaque element de H(c;) est une section de classe C , et on demontre que l'application canonique H (^) C (Z) est continue (lemme de Sobolev; voir [10, Lemme 3.2] ou bien [5]). k
r
r
r
k
55 ENERG1E
E T DEFORMATIONS EN GEOMETRIE D I F F E R E N T I E L L E
63
On sait le resultat suivant depuis quelque temps; voir [3] pour les idees essentielles : k
T H E O R E M E . —• Pour 0 ^ ft < GO Vespace C (c]) variete" differentiable, localement un espace de Banach, sion infinie en general. Pour n/2 < r -< GO Vespace une variete differentiable et les espaces de fecteurs admettent une structure hilbertienne.
est une de dimenH {^) est tangents r
r
Comme choix de T, les espaces H (£) semblent presenter certains avantages sur les C*(ij). En particulier, nous utilisons I'existence sur H (^) d'une structure riemannienne alin de construire le champ v d'Euler-Lagrange pour la fonctionnelle L, ce qui nous met a meme d'etudier les lignes de plus rapide decroissance de L. Or notre probleme general est bien l'etude de ces trajectoires de Vj, c'est-a-dire des applications r
s
$ : R X H'($) - * H'(S)
satisfaisant a l'equation
0
y£$).
II sera surtout question de leur convergence vers des points critiques de L lorsque le parametre t tend vers l'infini. Mais il convient de noter que meme I'existence et Punicite des trajectoires voulues presentent de grandes difficultes en general. La construction du champ Vj peut se faire aussi pour des valeurs de r inferieures a n/2, bien que H (£) ne soit probablement pas une variete alors. Par exemple, pour r — 0 et J; un fibre riemannien, le champ v est une application de H°(^) dans H°(TJj), ou T!; est lefibredes vecteurs tangents a f; et cette application est caracterisee par la formule r
f
(iM,
«> = ( I / U » =
oh fj> e H°(!j), oil u est un element de differentielle formelle de L.
v.h
H°(T^),
et oii (lf)
r
est la
3. Quelques excmplcs de deformations.
A. D E N S I T E S QUADRATIQUES. — Si \ i V -> X est un fibre fibre vectorielle, il en est de meme de 1'espace J ($), des ft-jets, et H {^) est un espace vectoriel admettant une struck
a
r
56
64
JAMES E E L L S ,
J R . E T J . H . SAMPSON
ture hilbertierme. Dans ce cas on peut considerer les densit£s variationnelles f: J*(i;) R qui sont quadratiques dans chaque fibre. Le champ Vj d'Euler-Lagrange associe a une telle densite definit a chaque point 0 e H{S;) un operateur lineaire, discontinu en general. r
]
1. — Prenons pour 5 le fibre T'* (X) formes differentielles exterieures sur X, et posons Exemple
f() = ij2\\d \>
X les
+ W j ,
9
oil d* est la codifferentielle pour la structure riemannienne donnee sur X. Alors I/: H (^) -> R n'est autre que l'integrale de Dirichlet pour les formes differentielles. Munissant H ^) du produit scalaire de H°(£), on obtient vfy) = A
1
etudiee par Milgram-Rosenbloom [7] fournit un semi-groupe a un parametre de deformations (R>0) X IT(5)-> H'tf), a partir d'une forme 9 donnee. Mais si H ($) est muni du produit scalaire deduit de l'integrale de Dirichlet, le champ vt est, a chaque point de H (^), un operateur borne"; et l'equation p
r
ot
a
;
definit un groupe a un parametre de deformations d'une forme f donnee. Cette theorie fut utilisee par Morrey-Eells [10] dans leur demonstration du theoreme de Hodge. Exemple 2. — Chaque operateur lineaire D : C°(5) C°°(rj) d'ordre k defini pour desfibresriemanniens S; et r) sur X determine une densite variationelle f-a d'ordre k,
57 ENERGIE
E T DEFORMATIONS E N GEOMETRIE
DIFFERENTIELLE
65
et le champ d'Euler-Lagrange est v (f) = D*D
r
T
T
TY
et
T'
1
On pose alors f = ° T'f o i oT
Exemple 1. — Prenons pour o* la fonction \/a , oil a„ est la n-ieme fonction symetrique elementaire. Les points critiques de la fonctionnelle L qui en resulte sont les soi-disant « sous-varietes minimales », bien que celles-ci ne soient ni varietes ni minimales en general. Desormais nous nous bornerons au cas
S
o u
oil g (resp. k) est la metrique sur X (resp. sur Y). L'integrale de faif) considere comme fonction sur X sera notee simplement E(
5
58 66
JAMES
EELLS,
J R . E T J . H . SAMPSON
cisement les zeros de l'operateur non lineaire elliptique du deuxieme ordre K^ =
A^ +
n (Y)gg;V
(1
E
oil les a? (resp. les 9") sont des coordonnees locales sur X (resp. sur Y ) , ou A est l'operateur de Laplace-Beltrami sur X , et ou les rja(Y) sont les symboles de Christoftel de Y , m etant la dimension de Y . Pour H ( X , Y ) muni de la structure metrique de H°, les 1
solutions de l'operateur non lineaire de la ckaleur (i)
sont les analogues des lignes de plus rapide decroissance.
Nous avons utilise la solution fondamentale de l'equation de la chaleur sur X pour demontrer [12] que l'equation (1) a une solution unique pour un certain intervalle de temps se reduisant a une application donnee de classe C pour t = 0. Certaines majorations des derivees d'une solution eventuelle de (1), obtenues par une methode geometrique due a Bochner dans un autre contexte, nous permirent d'etablir le 1
THEOREME. — Soient X et Y des varietes riemanniennes fermees, et supposons que la courbure riemannienne de Y soit non positive. Alors il existe dans chaque classe d'homotopie d'applications $ : X - > Y une representante harmonique qui est un point de minimum absolu pour I'energie E . Exemple 2. — Dans le cas d'une variete X de dimension 1 (l'intervalle ferme ou le cercle), on sait que I'energie E : H ^ X , Y)
-> R
est une fonction differentiable qui determine une bonne decomposition de 1'espace H ^ X , Y ) , dont on obtient les estimations de Morse des nombres de Betti de 1'espace des lacets de Y . On en trouve un expose elegant dans Palais [11]. Le theoreme enonce ci-dessus peut etre etabli dans le cadre de la theorie de la fonction differentiable E sur la variete
59 ENERGIE
E T DEFORMATIONS
EN GEOMETRIE
DIFFERENTIELLE
67
r
H (X, Y), pour r > ra/2 (n etant toujours la dimension de X). Mais il convient de signaler qu'a defaut de la condition requise sur la courbure de Y, la fonction E peut ne pas donner une bonne theorie de Morse. Par exemple, si nous prenons
la sphere euclidienne (n 3), alors E n'a aucun point de valeur minimum sur les composantes de H (S , S ) des applications de degre ^= 0. En effet, on peut trouver une famille a un parametre T , : S„ «-* S„ d'applications C°° et de degre un telle que lim E(*F ) = 0 (t -*• oo). Mais bien entendu il n'existe pas d'application de degre un dont I'energie s'annule. r
n
n
t
C. E N E R G I E S D'ORDRE SUPERIEUR. — S. Smale et R. Palais ont etudie le principle de Dirichlet dans 1'espace euclidien a n dimensions; S. Smale a pu demontrer I'existence d'un extremum pour une classe de fonctionnelles quadratiques du /r"°" ordre, avec k > n/2. Ce resultat souligne l'importance d'une etude de ce que nous appelerons e^nergie du /c" * ordre E . Done si T*X = T(T* X) est 1'espace fibre here de vecteurs tangents, chaque application 9 : X Y de classe C* induit saft""differentielle T"f : T*X->T"Y, et Ton peut s'en servir, comme nous l'avons fait dans le cas k = 1, pour definir une energie E^'f^). Le laplacien itere apparait comme partie principale du champ d'Euler-Lagrange associe a E \ II y a lieu de croire que des methodes analogues a celles qui nous servirent dans la demonstration du theoreme cite au n° 3 B permettront une generalisation de ce theoreme pour les E " , sans hypothese sur la courbure de Y si k est suffisamment grand. Et l'on peut esperer trouver une theorie de Morse pour E<*>: H*(X, Y) ^ R (A > n/2). m
w
-1
( t
0
D. Q U E L Q U E S REMARQUES. — La notion de o"-energie peut etre appliquee a d'autres situations. Par exemple, si p(g) = (R^g)) est le tenseur de Ricci de la metrique g sur X, alors <Ji(p[g)) = g^Rij = R, la courbure scalaire. Son integrale est la courbure totale de X, consideree comme fonction de g; notons-la T(g). Hilbert a montre [4] que ses extrema satisfont a l'equation R f — ^ R / 2 = 0.
60
68
JAMES
EELLS,
J R . E T J . H . SAMPSON
Voir aussi Taub [3]1, ou est decrite une methode par laquelle on peut normaliser la fonctionnelle T(g) afin d'obtenir pour ses extrema les metriques dites d'Einstein : — g"R/n = 0. Nous ne connaissons pas de conditions raisonnables sur X qui garantissent I'existence d'un extremum de T. Pourtant la nature des estimations figurant dans la demonstration du theoreme du n° 3 suggere I'existence d'une deformation de g dans une metrique d'Einstein sur X si g est a courbure riemannienne strictement positive. (Cf. Berger [1]). Pour la validite de cette assertion il est clair que certaines restrictions topologiques sont necessaires. Par exemple, S X S* et (S X S ) # (S X S ) (somme connexe) n'admettent pas de metrique d'Einstein. Remarquons, pour terminer, que la conjecture de Poincare dit que T (normalise convenablement) a un extremum si X est simplement connexe et de dimension 3. Pour d'autres problemes relatifs a Ia deformation de metriques, voir Calabi [2] et Yamabe [14]. 1
1
3
1
3
BIBLIOGRAPHIC [1] M. B E R G E R , Les spheres parmi les varietes d'Einstein, C.R. 254 (1962), 1564-1566, [2] E . C A L A B I , The space of Kahler metrics, Proc. Inter. Congress. Math., 1954. [3] J . E E L L S , On the geometry of function spaces, Symp. Inter, de Top., At . (1958), 303-308, [4] D. H I L B E R T , Die Grundlagen der Physik (Erste Mitteilung), Nachr. Ges. WLss. Gott., (1915), 395-407. [5] J . L . L I O N S , Equations differentielles operationne'les et problemes aux Hmites, Springer, 1961. [6] P . L A X and J . A . M I L G R A M . Parabolic equations and semigroup, Annals s
of Math. Studies, 33.
[7] A. M I L G R A M and P . C . R O S E N B L O O M , Heat conduction on Riemannian manifolds I, Proc. N.A.S., 37 (1951). [8] C . B. M O R R E Y , The problem of Plateau on a Riemannian manifold, Anncds of Math. 49 (1948), 801-851. [9] C . B. M O R R E Y , Multiple integral problems in the calculus of variations and related topics, Ann. Scuola Nor. Sup. Pisa, (1960), 1-61. [10] C . B. M O R R E Y et J . E E L L S , A variational method in the theory of harmonic integrals I, AnnaU of Math; 63 (1956), 91-128. [11] R. S. P A L A I S , Lectures on Morse theory; Mimeo. Notes. Brandeis Univ., 1963.
61
ENERGIE [12] [13]
[14]
E T DEFORMATIONS
E N GEOMETHIE
DIFF ERENTIELL E
69
et J . H. S A M P S O N , Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, Am. Journ. of Math, (a paraitre). A. H. T A U D , Conversation laws and variational principles in general relativity, Notes of a lecture at the Summer Syntp. in Diff. Geometry, Santa Barbara, (1962). H. Y A M A B E , On a deformation of Riemannian structures on compact manifolds, Osaka Math. J., 12 (1960), 21-37. J. EELLS
62
lie printed
from
Proceedings of the United Stalea Japan Seminar in Differentia! Ceomelry Kyoto, Japan, 1965
Variational Theory in Fibre Bundles J a m e s E E L L S , J r . a n d J o s e p h H . SAMPSON
11
T h i s i s a b r i e f d e s c r i p t i o n of c e r t a i n m e t h o d s — s o m e
old a n d
s o m e n e w — o f e s t a b l i s h i n g e x i s t e n c e i n t h e c a l c u l u s of v a r i a t i o n s , c o n f i n e d ( f o r t h e p r e s e n t p u r p o s e s ) to a s e t t i n g w h i c h s e e m s propriate
for
R i e m a n n i a n geometry.
r e s u l t s h a v e a p p e a r e d in
[4, 5, 6 ] ;
Some
our
ap-
of o u r m e t h o d s
viewpoint
overlaps
and to
a
c e r t a i n e x t e n t w i t h t h a t ( d e v e l o p e d e s s e n t i a l l y s i m u l t a n e o u s l y ) of P a l a i s a n d S m a l e [17, 18, 23],
1.
Abstract variational theory. (A)
C l a s s i c a l l y , t h e p r i m a r y m e t h o d i n t h e c a l c u l u s of v a r i a -
t i o n s is b a s e d o n t h e t h e o r e m of W e i e r s t r a s s t h a t i f F:
V-*R
is a
l o w e r s e m i - c o n t i n u o u s f u n c t i o n o n a c o m p a c t s p a c e V, t h e n t h e r e i s a p o i n t of V a t
which F
assumes
its
minimum
value.
This
w a s t h e b a s i s of t h e m e t h o d u s e d for e x a m p l e i n H i l b e r t ' s p r o o f of the
existence
of
geodesic
segments,
in
the
potential
theoretic
s o l u t i o n of t h e P l a t e a u p r o b l e m ( e v e n i n i t s e x t e n s i o n b y M o r r e y [12] to R i e m a n n i a n m a n i f o l d s ) , a n d i n t h e a b s t r a c t a r e a t h e o r y of F e d e r e r - F l e m i n g [7) a n d of R e i f e n b e r g [19]. A s a n illustration in the differentiable context, let V be a real Hilbert space
a n d F: V-*R
for s i m p l i c i t y of derivative
of
F
statement). a t xe
a differentiable If
l
d F{x;u,v)
f u n c t i o n (of c l a s s denotes
V i n t h e d i r e c t i o n s u, v,
the
z
C
second
then we have
the
PROPOSITION. / / d*F(x] v, v)^0 for all x,veV, then F is lower semi-continuous in the weak topology of V. Furthermore, the subsets of V which are weakly compact are precisely those which are bounded and weakly closed. T h i s s i m p l e r e s u l t is a n a b s t r a c t i o n of t h e b a s i c w o r k of T o n e l l i 1)
Research partially supported by N.S.F. Contract G P 4217 and G P 1825. 22
63
VARIATIONAL THEORY IN F I B R E BUNDLES
23
and Morrey (see [13]) on convexity properties of a variational density to insure existence in the calcuJus of variations. EXAMPLE. The norm is weakly lower semi-continuous in a Hilbert space V, and any closed convex subset K of V is weakly closed. Thus there is a point of K at minimum distance from the origin in V. This is the essence of Weyl's method of orthogonal projection. (B) That method was greatly broadened by M. Morse [15] using homology theory. The sets F (—oo,b)=Fi for b eR (which are closed when and only when F is lower semi-continuous) define a filtration of the space V, and analysis of the homology groups H(Fi, F ) for a^Lb relative to some fixed coefficient field leads to an abstract definition of critical points of type k^O. In this general form we have a method of obtaining extremals in the calculus of variations, used to a certain extent by Morse-Tompkins [16] and M. Schiffman [21] in their work on the Plateau problem. It is essential that we take into account critical points of type k > 0; for there are standard variational problems admitting extremals which are critical points of higher type, but not admitting any extremal which is a minimum: See (4, Section 4E of Chapter % _1
a
Indeed, from this general topological viewpoint the abstract calculus of variations becomes a theory of the decomposition of a space V by means of a real function, using the order of the real numbers. In particular, we would like to join each point x£ V to a critical point of F by a path (sort of a gradient line) lying in V. There are various types of decomposition that one might consider: 1) filtration of the space V itself by F; 2) filtration of the homology of V by the H{Ft, Ft); 3) decomposition of a suitable cellular space having the homotopy type of V; 4) handlebody decomposition of V (homeomorphically, or diffeomorphicaily, when that makes sense). We will call decompositions of types 2), 3), 4) Morse-Smale decompositions. (C) Our aim now is to present another method, less general, but well adapted to variational problems of differential geometry. In broad terms, we formulate certain variational problems in the context of infinite dimensional differentiable manifolds, and then use ideas of non-linear functional analysis and infinite dimensional
64 24
J. EELLS,
Jr. A N D J . H . SAMPSON
Riemannian geometry to produce solutions of the given problem. The effect will be to construct a decomposition of the appropriate function space by lines of steepest descent; for further motivation in a linear setting we refer to [6]. 2.
General form of the problem.
(A) Let X b e a compact oriented Riemannian M-manifold. We will suppose throughout that X has no boundary, which will have the effect of restricting our variational problems to closed problems; that will simplify our exposition. On the other hand, the modification of our formulation and methods to include boundary value problems, while presenting interesting analytic and geometric features, does not offer severe difficulties. Let r: V^X be a smooth ( = differentiable of class C°°) fibre bundle over X, whose fibre model is a manifold, again without boundary. We let / ( r ) : J*(V)-*X denote the bundle of r-jets of sections of r. A variational density of y of order r is a smooth function / : f'(V)-* R. If C"(V) denotes the space of smooth sections of the bundle J and j':C (V)-*C (J (V)) the r " jet prolongation, then we define the function F:C"(V)^>R through the diagram T
a
a,
C(V)
r
R
f
I'' , C<"U'(V))—>-C°"(XxR) Here the right hand arrow denotes the integration over X of a real valued function with respect to the volume «-form *1 of X: r
F(>P)= [fU 9>l
•
Our first problem is the following: Given a component of C"(V), find in it an extremal of F\ for the nonce, let " extremal" be taken in a homological sense. We arrive at once at a fundamental technical idea of variational theory: Although we have a specific problem formulated in a differentiable setting and we require differentiable solutions, it is most convenient to complete the problem by suitably enlarging the function space C"( V) and extending the
VARIATIONAL THEORY
IN FIBRE BUNDLES
25
function F to the enlarged space. In general there can be many essentially different completions of a problem. We will confine ourselves here to what we will call Riemannian problems: We will use essentially the Riemannian structure of X to construct spaces of sections of r which are often Hilbert space manifolds; our variational problems will satisfy a form of Legendre condition, so that their Euler-Lagrange equations will be of elliptic type. (B) Let us suppose for the moment that r is a Riemannian vector bundle f: W-*X; that means that £ is a smooth vector bundle over X having a linear connection P' and an inner product on each fibre, expressed as a 2-covariant tensor field g$, related by pe.g*=0. For any real number 1 < I J ? < C O let LAW) be the completion of the vector space C°°(W) in the norm Mvif>=Q
,
P
l?U)l '*iJ' .
For any integer r g 0 let LA W) be the Banach space of all sections such that all iterated covariant differentials Fty are of class LAO ^ t £ r). In particular, for p = 2 we have the inner product
giving a Hilbert space structure to LAW). The following results [24] are fundamental, where the inclusion is taken to mean that the natural map is a continuous injection; SOBOLEV THEOREMS 1. LA. W)^ LAW) and
\lq >
for 0^ s
— n/p,
. 2.
LA W ) c CK W) for r > n/p+k .
In the present paper we will need this second result only for k = 0. p = 2. The following application is known [3,5]: THEOREM. Let r: V-*J£ be a closed fibre subbundle of £, and LA V) = {
25
J. E E L L S , Jr. AND J. H. SAMPSON
then LAV) is a closed smooth submanifold of the Hilbert space LAW). In particular, LAV) has a smooth Riemannian structure. There are three main points in the demonstration: 1) Use of the inverse function theorem in Banach spaces; 2) use of the first Sobolev theorem to show that the composition of an LA W)-tunction and a smooth function is an Lr'fTTJ-f unction; 3) use of the second Soboiev theorem to insure that the topology in LAW) is larger than the uniform topology. (C) DEFINITION. A variational density / o f order r is (quadratically) Coextensive if the function F admits an extension of class C to a function LAV)-*B. For the case r = ? good conditions to insure that / b e Coextensive have been given by Smale [23]. In the present work we will not worry further about C*-extensivity of a variational density, for in most of our applications F; Lr\V)—*R arises as the restriction of a continuous quadratic form on the Hilbert space LAW), and is therefore automatically C°°-extensive. k
( D ) Given such a variational density / we consider the gradient field t of F on the Riemannian manifold LAV). Its trajectories (fpt)
are the solutions of
= — ?(
or^
relative to the initial Con-
dition p, = ip
a
when
/ = 0.
As in the finite dimensional case one proves the PROPOSITION. If r > M/2, / is Coextensive and / SO, then these trajectories are uniquely defined for all teR. A limit point of (fi) as t—*oa is a differentiable critical point p« of F, and hence represents an extremum in the generalized sense that it belongs tO Lr\V). We are thus in position to formulate the basic Condition (CT): Every trajectory of F has a critical point in its closure. This condition is not always satisfied. It is insured, however, if the sets F* are all compact, or if each trajectory (¥>()iao is relatively compact.
VARIATIONAL THEORY IN FIBRE
BUNDLES
27
If Condition (CT) is satisfied, then we are in position to provide generalized solutions to the problem posed in Section 2A: Starting with any p e L r ( V ) there is a critical point ip^eLr"(V) which, using the Riemannian geometry of L (V) and Sobolev's second theorem for r > M/2, is shown to be arcwise connected to fa- Now critical points tpSLr\V) can sometimes be shown to belong to C™(V), in which case our solution is satisfactory; however, that question of higher differentiability of critical points is a most difficult and only partially developed aspect of the field (see Morrey [13] for a discussion of recent results). We will content ourselves by remarking that in our examples in Section 3 below, all critical points p « e L r ( F ) are actually in C~{V). !
0
2
R
!
(E) Our first problem is only the first step in a much richer theory, of the sort outlined in Section IB, Palais and Smale have taken this stronger viewpoint by requiring Condition (C). Given any sequence (pjJtju in L \V) such that F{
in
Lr\V).
Condition (C) implies Condition (CT) and can be viewed as motivated by it; for if {
t
(
REMARK. Smale [23] has used Condition (C) in case r is a vector bundle to establish the existence of L -solutions of a certain non-linear Dirichlet problem. We cite also the recent work of F . Browder [1], applying (C) in the context of Lusternik-Schnirelmann 2
r
28
J . E E L L S , J r . AND J . H . SAMPSON
category. (F) To us the most unsatisfactory aspect of our theory is the requirement that r > «/2. Presumably, for 0 g r ^ M/2 the function space L \V) is not a manifold in general. That seems to mean, roughly speaking, that it is easier to solve variational problems whose integrals involve high derivatives in a prominent role than it is to solve low order problems. (This was recognized also by Palais [17, §16] and Smale [23, Condition (3)].) T
3.
Examples of the general theory.
(A) EXAMPLE 1. Suppose £: V-*X and n: W-*X are vector bundles over X and A an r** order linear elliptic operator from the sections of £ to sections of v. Then the variational density /(p) = l/2|.4 'l , relative to some inner product in q, is quadratically C=°-extensive, and defines a continuous quadratic form F: LAV)-* K( £ 0). Condition (CT) is satisfied, and in fact (as a consequence of the linearity of the problem) the trajectories converge to points of the kernel of A, a finite dimensional subspace of C™(V)
r
As an application, we cite the following well known result; Given iireC™(W), there is a
(B) We obtain a large variety of variational problems by taking the situation of Example 1 and restricting / to a closed subbundle r of f having compact fibres (this last condition is not essential; it suffices to have fibres having some metric boundedness conditions). For expositional reasons we will discuss only the following special case.
69
V A R I A T I O N A L T H E O R Y IN F I B R E B U N D L E S
29
EXAMPLE 2. Take for $ the trivial bundle XxR" and for r the product manifold X x F c X x J ? ' ; we will view the sections of r as maps from X to Y. We set A — (d+d*) and define the r energy E (
th
1
T
&(¥<) = 1/2 j \(d+d*)' \**\ V
. s
Its restriction to the closed submanifold Lr (Xx Y) is smooth (when r > n/2). Its extremals are called the polyharmonic maps of degree r {or r-harmonic maps) from X to Y. They are known to be smooth. THEOREM. / / Y is compact and r > n/2, then every map from X to Y is homotopic to an r-harmonic map. If r = \ or if Riem (Y)^.0, then the same conclusion holds. This was proved a few years ago [4, 5, 6]; a problem similar to the first assertion but involving boundary values was solved by Palais [17], and his approach can be applied to produce that assertion without essential difficulty. Furthermore, it is not difficult to generalize both assertions to non-trival bundles r. EXAMPLE. If n = l, the 1-harmonic maps are just the closed geodesies of Y. For this case our proof in [4] does not use any restriction on the sectional curvature of Y. A treatment of closed geodesies—in particular their Morse theory—as critical points of Ei has been given by J. McAlpin [10]; the starting point is verification of Condition (C), modifying the presentation of Palais [17]. It follows immediately (as McAlpin has shown) that there is a nontrivial closed geodesic on Y, thus producing a simple proof of the theorem of Fet. This approach has subsequently been taken up by Klingenberg [9], whose paper claims many important new results. If Y is not compact, then Condition (C) is never satisfied; however, if YIs complete and satisfies certain natural conditions at infinity, then Condition (CT) is satisfied. For r > 1 the r-harmonic maps are the poly geodesies, which on Y play the role of polynomials, just as geodesies play the role of straight lines.
70
30
J . E E L L S , Jr. AND J. H . SAMPSON
EXAMPLE. I f n = 2 and r=l, the energy function E\ is called the Dirkhlet-Douglas integral. The 1-harmonic maps are called minimal surfaces of Y (although of course they are neither minimal nor surfaces, in general). We feel that this case is very special in our theory. For instance, E, is a conformal invariant of X; as another instance, LftXx Y)czLAX x F ) for all 1
(C) Still another example of a variational problem obtained by restriction of a quadratic form has been given by Yamabe [25]: EXAMPLE 3. Take r as the trivial bundle XxR F: Li\XxR)->R by the quadratic form ( « S 3 ) Fiv) =
and define
4(w - 1 ) \d
where R:X->R is the scalar curvature of the Riemannian metric of X. Now for every number l^q<2n/(.n — 2) we have LiHXx R)
71
VARIATIONAL THEORY IN FIBRE BUNDLES
31
range the
4.
Variation theory and cobordism:
A problem.
(A) Thus far in our presentation we have emphasized homotopy aspects of our problem: Proving the existence of extrema in a given component of a function space of sections. That is a somewhat narrow view, and not at all in the proper spirit of many classical variational problems. (For instance, the Plateau problem starts with an immersed 1-manifold B in a given Riemannian manifold Y, and then asks for a minimal surface in Y spanning B. There are no additional restrictions on the surface, such as requiring that it should have a prescribed topological character.) It seems to us that the following problem—here loosely formulated for maps of closed manifolds, but capable of generalization—is of importance. (B) DEFINITION. Suppose the Riemannian manifold Y fixed, together with a positive integer n. Let us consider pairs {
th
PROBLEM. Fix r £ l . Under what conditions is there an extremal pair in a given cobordism class ? 1
For instance, let us take « = 1; then in the picture {
•See note on p. 33a,
72 32
J. E E L L S , Jr. AND J. H. SAMPSON l
and {
A cobordism of (
V
Bibliography [1] Browder, F.: Infinite dimensional manifotds and nonlinear elliptic eigenvalue problems, Mimeo. notes, Univ. of Chicago. 12 ] Dieudonne, J.: Foundations of Modern Analysis, Academic Press, 1960. [ 3 J Eells, J.: On the geometry of function spaces, Sym. Inter, de Top. Alg., 1958, 303-308.
[ 4 ] Eells, J. and J. H. Sampson: Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, Amer. J. Math., 86 (1964), 109-160. [5] : Energie et deformations en geometrie differentielle, Annales de lTnstitut Fourier, 14 (1964), 61-70.
[6]
: Analyse fonctionnelle non lineaire et geometrie differentielle, Sem. Ehresmann.
73
VARIATIONAL THEORY IN F I B R E BUNDLES
[7]
F e d e r e r , H . and W . F l e m i n g :
33
Normal and integral currents, A n n . of
M a t h . , 7 2 (1960), 458-520. [8]
Gaffney:
T h e heat equation method of Milgram and Rosenbloom for
open Riemannian manifolds, A n n . of Math., 6 0 (1954), 458-466. [9]
Klingenberg, W . :
[10]
McAlpin, J . : bia
(11]
U n i v . , T h e s i s , 1965.
M i l g r a m , A . and P . Rosenbloom: I,
[12]
Closed geodesies, Mimeo. Notes, 1 X 5 .
Infinite dimensional manifolds and Morse theory, ColumHarmonic forms and heat conduction
P . N . A . S . , 3 7 (1951), 180-184.
Morrey, C . :
T h e problem of Plateau on a Riemannian manifold, A n n .
of Math., 4 9 (1948), 801-851. [13j
•
;
Multiple integrals
in the calculus of
variations,
Colloq.
L e c t u r e s A . M . S . 1964. [14]
and J . E e l l s :
A variational method in the theory of harmonic
integrals I , A n n . of M a t h . , 6 3 (1956), 91-128. [15]
Morse, M . :
Functional topology
Gauthier-Villars, [16]
and T o m p k i n s : critical type,
117]
Palais, R . :
and
abstract
variational
theory,
minimal surfaces of
general
Paris, 1939. Existence of
A n n . of M a t h . , 4 0 (1939). Morse theory on Hilbert manifolds,
Topology, 2
(1963),
299-340. [18]
—
and S. Smale:
A generalized Morse theory,
Bull.
A.M.S.
165-172. [19]
Reifenberg, E . : Solution of surfaces.
the Plateau problem for m-dimensional
A c t a M a t h . , 1 0 4 (1960), 1-92.
[20]
Rothe, E . H . :
[21]
Schiffman, M . :
Gradient mappings.
[22]
Shibata, K . :
B u l l . A . M . S . , 5 9 (1953), 5-19.
T h e Plateau problem for non-relative minima, A n n ,
of Math., 4 0 (1939), 834-854. On the existence of a harmonic mapping, Osaka Math.
J . , 1 5 (1963), 173-211. [23]
Smale, S . : problem,
[24]
Morse theory and a non-linear generalization of the Dirichlet A n n . of Math., S O (1964), 382-396.
Sobolev, S . :
Applications of functional analysis, T r a n s l . Math Mono-
graphs, 7 (1964). [25]
Yamabe, H . :
On a deformation of Riemannian structures on compact
manifolds, Osaka, Math. J . , 1 2 (I960), 21-37.
Cornell U n i v e r s i t y Johns Hopkins University
74 33a
*Note to p. 31
Yamabe's assertion is correct, although his proof is not. A coherent exposition of the subject, describing carefully the contributions of many mathematicians, is given by Lee.J.M. and Parker, T. H.: The Yamabe problem, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc, 17 (1987), 37-91.
75
ToptAosj
Vol.
IS. pp. ZBMH. Pefgmwii
Pi™.
1974.
RESTRICTIONS
Printed In GreiL Brilun
O N HARMONIC MAPS
O F SURFACES
I . EELLS and J . C . WOOD (Received lOSeptember 1975) Dedicated 10 Professors S.-S. Chern and H Wtiilney. i l . STATEMENT OF THE MAIN RESULTS
LET X and V be closed orientable smoolh surfaces, and
w„+(2o ic)wM w
=0,
(1)
being the Euler-Lagrange equation associated to the energy functional
The purpose of this notet is to prove the THEOREM. If ip:X-*Y is a harmonic map relative to Riemannian metrics g and h, and if e(X) + \d\ e(Y)\>0, then ipis ± holomorphic relative to the complex structures determined by g and h. l
Here e(X) = 2-2p and e( Y) = 2 -2q denote Euler characteristics; and d„ is the degree of
h) of degree p, whatever the metrics (compatible with the complex
structures).
By way of contrast, A. M. Macbeath has shown us that meromorphic functions of degree p do exist on all other Riemann surfaces X of genus p 3=2. tA special (and Ihe moat important) case of (hat result was anounced a[ [he Summer Course in Complex Analysis, Trieste 1975{ 14]. I' is a pleasure Irj record our rhanks loM. J. Field. L. Lemaire, and A. M. Macbeath for their comments during the preparation of this note.
76
264
I. EELLS AND J. C. WOOD
Application. We give an analytical proof of trie following topological theorem of H . Kneser[7]: If q»2, then for any continuous map ip?.X-*Y, we have \d \e(Y)s: e(X). Namely, we introduce an arbitrary metric g on X, and a metric k of negative curvature on Y. and appeal to the existence theorem[3] to obtain a harmonic map a>: (X,g)-*(Y, ft) which is homotopic to thus d. = aV Now if \a\\e( Y) < e ( X ) , then e(X) + |d.e( Y)\ > 0, so that
|
[ W f f f - ' n l l s p - l . T h u s | d , ( q - l ) | = |p*H'(n)| = | H V - n | ' S p - l ] . Remark Lemaire notes that with our present theorems[81—we can respond to the question:
knowledge—especially
his
existence
Giuen closed orientable surfaces X, Y and a homotopy class of maps ip:X-*Y, can we find metrics g, h on X, Y relative to which there is a harmonic map if homotopic to ^i? The answer is yes in all cases except whenp = 1, q = O.and = 1. In that case the answer is DO. SI. PROOF OF THE THEOREM Given a smooth map y : X -* Y, its differential dip: T(X) -»T( Y) extends to a complex linear map d'
T{X)® C;
IX]. Corresponding to the decompositions T'(X) = V"{X)®
we have
3uoip: T'^X^T'^Y),
3e.,
H
T°'(X)
see [6, Ch.
V(X)-*T°-'(Y).
These can be interpreted as sections of the complex line bundles ncfXlOcff-T^r)
and
TUX)®
respectively. We note that 3i.o^=0iffp is anti-holomorphic, c V , f = 0 i f f ip is holomorphic. The following result is standard; PROPOSITION 1. If the sections i'l.w- and 3 ip have only finitely many zeros, then 0lI
Index 0,. a>) = -e(X)
+
o
d,elY)\
Index lo .,
(2)
a
Here Index(i) = the sum of the zeros of the section s (having only finitely many zeros) of the complex line bundle f over X, counted at each point x according to the local degree of s at x. Then Index(s) = c(f), the (first) Chem class of f; see [11, Part III]. For the first assertion of the Proposition, we take H . o ( X > ® c » > " T " { Y ) for f Now [A, Chapter I ] l
c«.®f ) = c«,)+c« ), 5
)
c(f*) = - c ( f ) ,
|
e(p- ^)=d.e(f).
Since we have canonical isomorphisms T t . ( X ) = T * ( X ) and T ' ^ O O ^ T
a
s
complex line
Index (a,. >) = c{TUX)® -'T(Y)) = clTU(X)+c{
cV
r
PROPOSOION 2. If q>:X->Y is harmonic, then the (Ifir-pan of the tensor field ip*h is a holomorphic quadratic differential on X; we denote it by i).. Furthermore, n . = 0 iff ip is ± holomorphic.
77 RESTRICTIONS ON HARMONIC MAPS OF SURFACES
265
Here
T,, = A ( z ) d z ' = c r V ( z ) ) | r f f -
0)
The partial differentials Sijof and 3*.i
(4)
Y is harmonic but not ± holomorphic, then neither 3,.nip nor Bo.iip has a
zero of infinite order. m
For otherwise the holomorphic function a(z) = o{\z\ )
as z-*0
for all m »0; but that would
imply that a = 0 , so that by Proposition 2, ip would be ± holomorphic. LEMMA. If ip: X - » Y is harmonic but not ± holomorphic, then in isothermal charts 3x$
3wiBz = Az
+o(\z\") for some m 3 0 and complex number A ^ 0 ;
Bwl3z = Bz" +o{\z\") for somen 1*0 and BkO-
(5)
h
Proof. Taylor's expansion to m' order for the first gives 3wldz-Q (z,z) m
where Q
+ R(z,g),
(6) m
m
is a homogeneous polynomial of degree m ==0, and R is 0(1^| ) as z - * 0 .
The preceding Corollary shows that Q „ # 0 for some m. Substituting (6) in ( 1 ) gives
31 Now 3Q l3z m
a
3z
is either a homogeneous polynomial of degree m - 1 or is identically 0. Each of the 1
other terms is o(|z|"'~ ). It follows that BQaldz = 0. Therefore Q„ is a holomorphic homogeneous polynomial of degree m, and consequently has the form Az"
The case of Bo.iip is handled
similarly. Remark. A local expansion theorem for harmonic maps, their differentials, and Jacobians was given by Wood [12, T h 1.4.8; 13], based on work of Hart man-Win tner and Heinz. Our needs here are more modest, and the above direct argument suffices. PROPOSITION 3, If ip:X-*Y
is harmonic and not ± holomorphic, then the zeros of 3,. ip and a
de.tip are isolated and of strictly positive index. Proof. Taking an isothermal chart centered at a zero x of Si&p, we obtain from (5) Bw/dz = Az" +o(|z|"') with m >0; thus d,.r,ip has a zero of index m at x. Similarly for the zeros of do. 1 (p. Proof of the theorem. Assume that
one of the right members of (2) is negative,
contradicting Proposition 3. REFERENCES 1. H. BEHNKE and F. SOMMEB: Theorie der ano/jiiicfitn Funkiionen finer kompiexen Vaiandtrikhen. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1955). 2. S. S. CHFRN and S. I. GOLDBERG: On the volume-decreasing properly of a class of real harmonic mappings. Am. 3. Morn. 97 (1975), 133-147.
3. J. EELLS and J. H. SAMPSON: Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds. Am. J. Math. 86 (1964), 109-160. 4. F. HIRZEBRUCH: Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry. Third EdiLion. Springer (1966), 5. M. GBPSTGNIIADEB and H. E. RAUCH: On extremal quasi-conformal mappings—1, Proc. natn. Acad. Sci- 40
(1954).
808-812.
and K. NOMIZU: Foundations of differential geometry—II. lnterscience (1969). 7 H. KneSEit: Die klcinste Bedeckungzah] imnwrhalb einer (Classe von Flachenabbitdungen. Moth. Ann 103 (1930). 347-358. 8. L . LEUATRE: Applications harmonique! de surfaces. C.S., Paris. 280 (1975), Ser. A. 897-899. 9. J . MtLttOR: On the existence of a connection with curvature zero, Comm. Math Httv. 32 (1958). 215—223¬ 10. R. T. SMITH: Harmonic mappings of spheres. Thesis, Warwick duly 1972), 6. S KOBAYASW
2fiS
I. EELLS AND I. C WOOD
11. N. SmwtOD: Topology oj Fibre Bundles. Princeton (]9J1). 12. J . C. WOOD: Harmonic mappings between surfaces. Thesis, Warwick (June 1974). 13. J. C. WOOD: Singularities of harmonic mappings, lo appear. 14. J, C. WOOD: Harmonic maps and complex analysis, Proc. Summer Course in Complex Analysis. Trieste (1975). 15. H-H Wu: The equidistribution theory of holomorphic curves. Ann. Math. Stud (1970). University of Warwick. Brighton Polytechnic.
79
The Surfaces of Delaunay James Eells
1. Background
2. Ron I elk's of a Conic
In 1841 the astronomer/mathematician C Delaunay isolated a certain class of surfaces in Euclidean space, representations of which he described explicitly Ml in an appendix lo that paper M. Strum characterized Delaunay's surfaces vanationally; indeed, as the solutions to an iso peri metric problem in the calculus of variations. That in turn revealed how those surfaces make their appearance in gas dynamics; soap bubbles and stems of plants provide simple examples. See Chapter V of the marvellous book |81 by D'Arcy Thompson for an essay on the occurrence and properties of such surfaces in nature.
The first step is to derive the equations describing the trace of a focus F of a nondegenerate conic f as ^ rolls along a straight line in a plane (Perhaps these derivations were better known a century agol) We examine various cases separately f IS A PARABOLA:
More than 130 years later E. Calabi pointed out to me thai the solutions to a certain pendulum problem of R. T, Smith \7] could be interpreted via the Gauss maps of Delaunay's surfaces [2}. And Eells and Lemaire 141 found that the Gauss map of one of those surfaces produces a solution lo an existence problem in algebraic/differential topology. The purpose of this article is lo retrace those steps in an expository manner—as a revised version of [2)
James Eells
MATHEMATICAL INTtl.LICENCtfl VOL 1. NO I *> I9R7 Spiin^Tr-V-rl^ UVK/ York 5 3
80 Here A is the vertex of f The line PK is tangent to ( at the point K. The following properties are elementary: (1) Correspondingly marked angles are equal; (2) FP is orthogonal lo PK. Thus we obtain FA = FP cos Z AFP = FP cos C PFK. Now we change our viewpoint and Ihink of the tangent line PK as the axis—the i-axis—along which the parabola t rolls. We denote the ordinate of F by y; and observe that cos I . PFK =
m
as
where a denotes the angle made by the tangent with the x-axis. Thus setting c = FA, we obtain the differentia] equation
V
ds
Thai equation describes the shape of a flexible inextensible free-hanging cable—thereby explaining its name. In that context we can obtain the equation of the catenary as the Euler-Lagrange equation of the potential energy integral 1
2
V +• y' dx.
subject to variations holding fixed the length integral PI £Vl +
dx = L.
Indeed, from general principles we are asked to find A real number a and an extremal of the integral
l(y)
- Q,
c - y
(2.1)
- e cosh xle.
~
describes the rate of change of abscissa of F with respect to arc length s; i.e., •m_
V = 2 (<*" +
=
j'W
1
+
v"
+
"yVl + y'
:
dx
lis Euler-Lagrange equation has first integral y -
/(I + ay)- . /
r;
, for (J
i
R.
The equation of the catenary is derived from this, choosing suitable normalizations. The curvature of ( is measured by the amount of turning of its tangent That is expressed by the Gauss map of f into the unit circle, given by x —• where dx c COS o. = — = - , ds y
V l + y"
-
Its solution is the catenary
A*
54 THE MATHEMATICAL IATGITGENCEB VOL. *. NO. 1.11?
81 The Gauss map of the roulette of the parabola is injective onto an open semicircle
The locus (of either focus) will be called the unduiary:
f !S AN ELLIPSE:
Its Gauss map is given by x —* a . where y
1
- —
f/V
y + (-> COS a - + " It maps i onto a closed arc of the unit circle. There are two limiting cases, which are perhaps best handled separately: When b -• a the unduiary degenerates to a straight line, the locus of the centre of a circle rolling on a line. And where b —• 0 the unduiary becomes a semicircle centred on the .r-axis.
1 O F'
j
t IS AN HYPERBOLA:
Here F and F are Ihe foci of t j the 0 is its centre. The line PKP' is tangent to i at K. Letting n and IF denote the lengths of the semi-axes of f , we obtain the following properties: (1) TM + F K = 2a > 0; (2) the pedal equation PF • FT 6]);
y\\i' O
;
= b (see [°. Ch.VHI
/
(3) the normal to the locus of F passes through K P^-
Again using PK as i-axis. S= - sin i. FKP = cos L FTP - ^~
In analogy with the Case of the ellipse, we have 4=-su\i-
(1) FK - P K = 2o > 0;
F'KP- = cos L FTP' = ~-.
2
(2) Pf - P T = b . Thus we obtain the following differential equation for the locus of F, given as a firsi integral of an EulerLagrange equation:
From these we derive •
i
to
z
u ± lay
2
y y' = b , so Ihat
f
- 2«y| +
By analyzing all cases and taking a & b. we obtain 1
2
2
b = 0.
(2.3)
The loci of the two foci fit together to form the curve which we shall call the nodary:
V = 0.
V t 2 « y ^ + b = 0.
§j
ai)
The solutions to that differential equation can be given explicitly in terms of elliptic functions; see [J], [5, pp. 416-416].
82 lis Gauss map x -* a, is governed by !
y "& cos a, = ~ Thus f - y'fy = ± e , where b is another real paramlay eter. Consequently, The Gauss map has no extreme points, and direct verification shows that it is surjective. A roulette of a conic is a catenary, unduiary. nodary, ' Vl + jr 5 a straight line parallel to the i-axis, or a semicircle centred on the i-axis. But 2
1 _ dx V l + y' ~ ds 2
3. Surfaces of Revolution with Constant Mean Curvature
so the extrema] equation for our variational problem coincides with that of the roulette of the ellipse or hyperbola ((2.2) and (2.3)).
Rotating each of the roulettes about its axis of rolling produces five types of surfaces in Euclidean 3-space GAUSS MAPS: In an analogy with the case of oriented R . called the surfaces of Delaunay: the catenoids, iwducurves in the plane (§2), we associate to any oriented loids, nodoids, the tight circular cylinders, and the spheres. surface M immetsed in R its Gauss map y : M -» S (the unit 2-sphere centred at the origin in R ), defined by assigning to each point x E M the positive unit VARIATIONAL CHARACTERIZATION: We formu- vector orthogonal to the oriented tangent plane to M late the following isoperimetric principle, for the un- at x. Its differential dy[x) can be interpreted as a symduloid and nodoid (only minor technical changes metric bilinear form on the tangent space TJA. Its eibeing required for the other cases). genvalues k,,X are well determined up to order. The Consider graphs in R of non-negative functions symmetric functions K = k K and H = (\i + are called the curvature of M and the wean curvature of yM*rj,*il— R(^O) the mmersltm at x, respectively. For instance, with fixed volume of revolution (1) the cylinder has K = 0 and constant mean curvature H * 0; 1/(3,) = « (''y'dx: (2) the sphere of radius R has constant curvature K •B = IfR and constant mean curvature H = 1/R; (3) the catenoid has variable curvature K and mean and extremize their lateral area curvature H = 0; (4,5) the unduloid and nodoid have variable curvaAii/) = 2K f 'y ds ture K and constant mean curvature H # 0. 3
3
3
2
J
x
t
2
s
2
2
holding the endpoints fixed. By general principles of constraint (under the heading of Lagrange's method of multipliers for isoperimetric problems [5}), we are led to the Euler-Lagrange equation associated with the integral
F(y) =
»jV
d l+
3
,2
+ 2oyVl + y )dx.
Here o is a convenient real parameter- Its integrand f does not involve x explicitly, so we obtain a first integral from 5*
THE MATHEMATICAL
3
DELAUNAY'S THEOREM: The complete immersed surfaces of revolution in R with constant mean curvature are precisely those obtained by rotating about their axes the roulettes of the conies.
ds)
>o = n ['V
These five surfaces were recognized by Plateau, using soap film experiments. Say that a surface of constant mean curvature in R is complete it it is not part of a larger such surface. From Sturm's variational characterization, we obtain
rtmlXsaKm VOL.
I. NO.
I. iw
Thus Delaunay's surfaces are those surfaces of revolution M in R which are maintained in equilibrium by the pressure of a field of force which acts everywhere orthogonally to M. 3
83 4. Harmonic Gauss Maps
Again, that has an explicit solution in terms of elliptic functions. Furthermore, the associated map y : R* - » S An easy yet vitally important theorem of Ruh-Vilms is doubly periodic, factoring through the torus T <* R IZ [6] states that: to produce a map y : T—- 5. as desired. Incidentally, the integrand of E is A surface M immersed in R* has cuiistanl mean curvature if and only ifils Causs map -y:M->S satisfies the equation ®dyp = a' + y s i n V = \dyfy, Calabi made the beautiful observation that Smith's where A denotes the Laplacian of M with conformal maps y : T —> S are the Gauss maps of certain surfaces of structure induced from that of R', and vertical bars the Delaunay [2j. Euclidean norm at each point. Indeed, (4.1) is the condition for harmonicity of the map y |3j—and is the Euler- A HARMONIC REPRESENTATIVE IN A HOMOLagrange equation associated to the energy (or action) TOPY CLASS: If we represent the torus T in the form integral T = R/nZ x Rj2nZ and use polar coordinates (r,0) on the unit sphere S, then a map from the cylinder to S of the form Uii - U\\dy¥. r •= »(r), » = y M :
1
£ is a conformal invariant of M. SMITH'S MECHANICS: Motivated by certain mechanical analogies, R. T. Smith |7J found solutions to equation (4.1) as maps -y : R —- S, as follows: Think of points of R parametrized by angles (d>,B), and use spherical coordinates on the sphere 5: !
!
e
r
subject to the conditions u>(0) = 0, 4>(n) = n is harmonic if and only iffl>satisfies the pendulum equation (4.3) with A = 1. There are such solutions. Indeed [4], the GAUSS map of the nodoid induces a harmonic map of a Klein bottle y : K -* S. Furf'imnore, that map is not deformable to a cunslitrrl map. Hopf's classification theorem insures that the maps K —* S are partitioned by homotopy into just two classes. Thus the harmonic map y represents the nontrivial class.
2
References ] C- Delaunay, Snr
la surface de revolution dont la courbure moyenne est constants, f. Math, pures et appl. Ser. 1 (6)
If we restrict our attention lo maps y of the special form ,B
(*,fl| = fe sin n(c|>), cos o(o»), then the equation of harmonicity becomes the pendulum equation o" =
j
sin
7. It. T. Smith, Harmonic mappings of spheres. University of
2a.
(4.3)
We assume that a(0) = ir/2, so that the solution oscillates symmetrically about Ttt2. Now a first integral of (4.3) is given by lc - A cos
(1841), 309-320. With a note appended by M. Sturm. 2. J; Eells. On the surfaces of Delaunay and their GAUSS maps. Proc. IV Int. Colloq. Diff. Geo. Santiago de Composltla [1978), 97-116. 3. J. Eells and L. Lemaire. A report on Itarmoiuc maps. Bull. London Math. Soc. 10 (1978), 1-68, 4. J, Eells and L. Lemaire, On the construction of harmonic and holomorphic maps between surfaces. Math. Ann. 252 (1980), 27- 52. 5. A. R. Forsyth, Calculus of variations. Cambridge (1927). 6. E. A. Ruh and ]. Vilms, The tension field of the Gauss map. Trans. Amer. Math Soc. 149 (1970), 569- 573.
2
Warwick Thesis (1972). 0. D'A. W. Thompson, Growth and form. Cambridge (1917). 9. C. Zwikker, TIic advanced geometry of plane curves and their applications. Dover (1963). Mathematics Institute University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL England THE MATHEMATICAL
LNIELllCENCEH VOL
9.
NO- ].
IW
57
2
84
B a
manuscripts math. 28, 101 - 108 (1979)
*
2i^£«fi?«i!
mathematica ©ti»Sprjn :cf-Vtrlaiil >''9 1
t
MINIMAL GRAPHS James
Eells
D e d i c a t e d t o Hans Lewy and C h a r l e s B . M o r r e y , J r .
E l e m e n t a r y p r o p e r t i e s of harmonic maps between Riemannian m a n i f o l d s a r e i n t e r p r e t e d v i a t h e i r g r a p h s , viewed as n o n p a r a m e t r i c m i n i m a l s u b m a n i f o l d s (Proposition 1). Then examples a r e g i v e n of n o n p a r a m e t r i c submanifolds of compact R i e m a n n i a n m a n i f o l d s which cannot be deformed - through n o n p a r a m e t r i c submanifolds - to n o n p a r a m e t r i c m i n i m a l s u b m a n i f o l d s ( P r o p o s i t i o n s 2 and 4 ) .
L e t <J>:M and d e f i n e
N be a smooth map between
$:M -+ M * N by $ ( x )
a smooth embedding
= (x,rj>(x)).
of M onto a c l o s e d
M >= N, which we c a l l
the graph
of_ the map ttj •
( N , h ) when we w i s h to
Riemannian c o n s i d e r a t i o n s .
Then $
submanifold
Riemannian m e t r i c s g , h on M,N, we w r i t e form $ : ( M , g ) *
manifolds, is of Given
the map i n
the
emphasise
The graph r
of 4
is
W endowed w i t h the R i e m a n n i a n m e t r i c induced from
that
of
an
(M g N,g x h ) .
e x t r e m a l of
Then
the volume
i s minimal ( i . e . , functional
101
is
EELLS
V(*)
f
=
m
x
1
|A »*( i|dx ...dx
m
M f A [A * Cx)| M p>0 P
=
h e r e m •= dim H , and /^<J> ( x )
is
A
of (1) is
2
f t
J
the d i f f e r e n t i a l
cj> ( x ) )
if
the p -
t h
and o n l y
4: (M,$ (g x h)) -»- (M * N,g x h ) an e x t r e m a l of
E(»)
the energy
=
k\
f f l
dxl...dx
;
exterior if
power
the map
harmonic; i . e . ,
functional
| $ ( x ) | ^ e T ^ ^ g x h ) d x ^ . - d x 'm ' ( x j | - / d e t T (,g x hj d x ' . . . a : 2
A
m
A
' •!
See
[3,
If $ = I x
p.119].
I : M •* M d e n o t e s the so
i d e n t i t y map,
( I x
then thus
we have *
PROPOSITION 1. projections, if
(g
x
h)
-
g + c#> h .
L e t t i n g I T ' , T T " denote the
the map $ i n
the c o m p o s i t i o n s
$'
(1)
indicated
harmonic i f
and o n l y
and 3>" a r e both h a r m o n i c :
102
86 EELLS
(M,g + * h)
(M,g)«f-
(M *
This follows
EXAMPLE 1.
N
,g
x h)
MN,h).
from the c o n s i d e r a t i o n s
[9,6].
m
R , w i t h induced E u c l i d e a n
( N , h ) be
the form $ ( x )
n
R .
= (x,ffi(x))
Then a map $:U -+ R is
nonparametric immersion. k($)
p.133].
L e t (M,g) be an open s u b s e t U of
the E u c l i d e a n space metric; let
in [3,
m + n
of
traditionally called a
Set
= g + ij>*h = $*(g
x h);
thus f o r 1 £ i , j < m we have
where
-
1
B^/Sx .
The t e n s i o n f i e l d s
E u l e r - L a g r a n g e o p e r a t o r s of
the a s s o c i a t e d
f u n c t i o n a l , whose v a n i s h i n g i s h a r m o n i c i t y ; see
l e f t members of the m Z - V ( / d e t lcC
the
energy
the c o n d i t i o n
[ l , 3 ] ) T(4>'), !"($") a r e
by the (2')
(i.e.,
for
represented
systems
1 J
(*))
=
0 ( 1 < j <_ m ) ;
L
(2")
m t i,j=l
(/det ax
1J
k ( » k (
1
=
0.
3
These a r e c l e a r l y e q u i v a l e n t system:
103
to the m i n i m a l s u r f a c e
87
EELLS
m Z -21-1 rJX
(3')
(/det
k(*) k
1 J
($)
=
0 (1 < j
<. m ) ;
1
m E
(3")
=
EXAMPLE 2 .
0.
L e t (M,g) be a r b i t r a r y ,
and take N = R .
Then T ( * ' ) = 0 a u t o m a t i c a l l y i f T<4") = 0; and the c o n d i t i o n T ( $ " ) = 0 means t h a t harmonic f u n c t i o n . our
notation
(M,k($)) + R i s
a
(As we have a l r e a d y e m p h a s i s e d ,
indicates
t h a t $ i s harmonic w i t h
respect
to t h e R i e m a n n i a n m e t r i c k(<J>) on M; i n p a r t i c u l a r , may
depend on
. m Z
In local
it
charts
J
k <•)*..-
=
0,
and
T a k i n g (M,g) to be R , then T(3>) = 0 m . Z ( * . / / l + |d$| ) = 0. i = l 3x
if
2
(4) The
i f and o n l y
equation
form.
(4)
is
quasilinear e l l i p t i c ,
I t i s not uniformly e l l i p t i c ,
the maximum to minimum e i g e n v a l u e s of
the c o e f f i c i e n t s
be
bounded.
of
S.jjJ,
is
104
of
in
divergence
f o r the r a t i o of the m a t r i x ( a 2
1 + |dr)| ,
)
w h i c h may not
EELLS
EXAMPLE 3 .
5
L e t (M,g) and ( N , h ) be K a h i e r
and tf>:M •* N a holomorphic map. n Kahier metric for follows
that *
the complex
manifolds,
Then g + $ h i s a s t r u c t u r e of M.
the i d e n t i t y map
= I
: (M,g + 4> h) *
(M,g) and
*" - <> f : (M,g + 4 h) -
(N,h)
a r e b o t h h a r m o n i c , b e i n g holomorphic maps of manifolds
It
[3, p . 1 1 8 ] .
Kahier
Consequently,
* : (M,g +0 h) * (M x N,g x h) i s h a r m o n i c ; i . e . , any holomorphic map cj>:M -*- N between 11
Kahier manifolds
Let
has m i n i m a l graph T .
(M,g) be the 2 - s p h e r e
S or the r e a l
p l a n e P , w i t h any Riemannian m e t r i c g.
Then f o r
conformal map $iM •* ( N , h ) the m e t r i c g +
to g.
*" = i s harmonic i f case,
is
(M,g)
and
(M,g +
and o n l y i f
(N,h)
(|>:(M,g) •* ( N , h ) i s ;
cf i s w e a k l y c o n f o r m a l , Proposition
and
in
that
is^ a_ m i n i m a l g r a p h .
1 g i v e s an i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of m i n i m a l
graphs i n terms of harmonic maps; g e n e r a l l y ,
in
c o n t e x t the n o t i o n
of h a r m o n i c i t y depends on a
Riemannian m e t r i c
(on the domain) w h i c h i n v o l v e s
map i t s e l f .
any
The i d e n t i t y map
(M,g +
i s harmonic [ 3 , p . 1 2 6 ] ;
projective
An e x c e p t i o n
a r i s e s i n the c a s e
105
of
that
the
89 6
EELLS
surfaces:
We c a n i n t e r p r e t a r e s u l t
follows:
For
graph
in
keeping
any m e t r i c s g , h
(P * S , g * h )
the same n o t a t i o n
PROPOSITION 2.
is_ h o r i z o n t a l .
[2]
Furthermore,
we have
of
of
the
unique
such maps, t h e n rJ> cannot o
to £i map w i t h m i n i m a l graph
A generalisation
as
o_n P , S e v e r v m i n i m a l
I f $ ;P •* S r e p r e s e n t s
n o n t r i v i a l homotopy c l a s s be deformed
in [2,7]
i n P x S.
a theorem of Lawson [5^
gives
PROPOSITION 3 .
E v e r y m i n i m a l graph of p x S
3
is
horizontal.
Here S
d e n o t e s the E u c l i d e a n n - s p h e r e .
contrast, mal
it
graphs
By way of
i s w e l l known t h a t t h e r e a r e many m i n i -
in P x s
n
f o r n >_ 4, which a r e not
horizontal.
We can i n t e r p r e t the Proposition
2,
theorem i n
[4]
as we d i d
t a k i n g i n t o a c c o u n t Example 3:
106
in
90
EELLS
Let
( T , g ) be the
PROPOSITION 4.
2-torus,
7
w i t h any R i e m a n n i a n m e t r i c
The graph r
o f a harmonic map
4>: ( T , g ) •+ ( S , h ) of_ s t r i c t l y p o s i t i v e submanifold
g.
degree i s _a K a h i e r
(hence m i n i m a l ) of T x S .
No map
degree 1 _is_ homotopic to a. map
w i t h m i n i m a l graph i n T * S.
Finally, be adapted
let
to the
us note t h a t
can
c a s e of harmonic s e c t i o n s $ o f
Riemannian f i b r e b u n d l e s map
these constructions
TT:W •* M, g e n e r a l i s i n g
the
(1).
REFERENCES [l]
E E L L S , J . and L . LEMAIRE, A r e p o r t on harmonic maps. B u l l . London Math. S o c . 10, 1-68 (1978)
[2|
E E L L S , J . and L . LEMAIRE, On the c o n s t r u c t i o n of harmonic and holomorphic maps between s u r f a c e s . (To appear )
[3]
E E L L S , J . and J . H . SAMPSON, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian m a n i f o l d s . Am. J . Math. 86, 109-160 (1964)
[4]
E E L L S , J . and J . C . WOOD, R e s t r i c t i o n s on harmonic maps of s u r f a c e s . Topology 15, 263-266 (1976)
107
91 EELLS
[5]
LAWSON, H . B . , Complete m i n i m a l Ann. Math. 9 2 , 335-374 (1970)
[6]
LAWSON, H. B . and R . OSSERMAN, N o n - e x i s t e n c e , n o n - u n i q u e n e s s and i r r e g u l a r i t y of s o l u t i o n s to the m i n i m a l s u r f a c e s y s t e m . A c t a Math. 139, 1-17 ( 1 9 7 7 )
[7]
LEMAIRE, L . , On the e x i s t e n c e of harmonic U n i v e r s i t y of Warwick T h e s i s (1977)
[8]
OSSERMAN, R . , M i n i m a l v a r i e t i e s . Math. S o c . 7 5 , 1092-1120 (1969)
[9]
OSSERMAN, R . , A s u r v e y of minimal s u r f a c e s . Van N o s t r a n d Math. S t u d i e s 25 (1969)
[10]
surfaces in
Bull.
3
S .
maps.
Amer.
OSSERMAN, R . , Some p r o p e r t i e s of s o l u t i o n s to the minimal s u r f a c e system for a r b i t r a r y codimension. P r o c . Symp. Pure Math. Amer. Math. Soc. 15, 283-291 (1970)
James E e l l s Mathematics I n s t i t u t e U n i v e r s i t y of Warwick Coventry, England
(Received January 2o,
108
1979)
92
Mathematische AlUISiCII
Math. Ann. 252, 27-52 (1980)
© by Spnnger-Vcilag 1980
On the Construction of Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces* 1
J. Eells and L. Lemaire
2
1 Department of Mathematics, University of Warwick, Coventry C V 4 7AL, U K 2 Department de Mathematiqtte, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Boulevard du Triomphe, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgique
Introduction (A) Let M and N be compact surfaces without boundary; and a homotopy class of maps of M into N. We shail denote by & the integer which is the common value of the twisted degree of any map <^eJff; and the index of the subgroup (b^n^M)) of TT.IJV). The following result is an immediate consequence of recent work of Edmonds [14]; see Theorem 1.3 below: x
Theorem 1. Suppose that M and N are orientable, and that Jff is a homotopy class with d 4=0. For any complex structure on N there is a complex structure on M relative to which JV contains a holomorphic representative if and only if \d .\>j , or 4>^:%^Mj-tn^N) is injective. x
x
x
(B) Ifg and /tare Riemannian metrics on Mand N, thenamap<^:M-*N [which we will often write tp:(M,g)-*(N,h) for emphasis] is harmonic if the divergence of its differential vanishes everywhere; see Sect. 2 for details. We let S,T,P,K denote the sphere, torus, projective plane, Klein bottle, respectively. In the present paper we will establish Theorem 2. The surfaces M and N admit Riemannian metrics relative to which 3nf contains a harmonic representative, except 1) when Af= T, N = S, and \dj = \; 2) when M — T,N — P, and y? is the class obtained from that in I) by composition with the covering map n:S~*P; 3) when M = P, N = S, and jj? is the nontrivial class; 4) when M — P,N = P, and j>f is the class obtained from that in 3) by composition with n; 5) perhaps when N — P and for certain classes of nonorientable maps M->P with mod 2 degree = 0. (That case does not arise. See [28, §5.8J.) * The main results in this paper were presented at the Mathematische Arbeitstagung (Universitat Bonn) in June 1978
0025-5831/80/0252/0027/S05.20
93 J. Eells and L . Lemaire
We know of no case where 5| provides a new exception. Of course, Theorem 2 bears on the fundamental Problem [15]. Given Riemannian metrics g, h on M, N, when does harmonic map
contain a
It is known [see Corollary (2.7) below] that the answer is always, provided + S orP; this implies the corresponding statement in Theorem 2. Of course, it also follows as an application of the main existence theorem in [15]. There will be several other circumstances in which we can provide a solution to the problem; for instance, if M and N are spheres or projective planes; see Sect. 3 below. The cases 1) and 2) were established in [17]. Cases 3) and 4) were found by the authors - and first appeared in [27]; see Sect. 3 below. The case N = S was treated in [29] for M orientable; and is Theorem 4.2 for M non orientable. (C) Our presentation is organised as follows: In Sect. 1 we recall the homotopy classification of maps between surfaces, and formulate Edmonds' theorem characterising those homotopy classes which contain branched immersions. Section 2 summarises the properties required of harmonic maps of surfaces. In Sect. 3 we obtain a complete description of harmonic maps between spheres and projective planes, with arbitrary Riemannian metrics. Section 4 is devoted to the existence part of Theorem 2, when IV=S; and Sect. 5 to that when N = P. In Sect. 6 we give examples of harmonic maps M-*S which arise as Gauss maps of immersions of M in R with constant mean curvature, especially in relationship to the examples of Lawson. Section 7 develops some related constructions for such immersions in IR ; we aiso adapt a geometric interpretation (due to Calabi) as Gauss maps of an analytical construction (due to Smith) of harmonic maps 4
3
T->S. K These examples have served as primary motivation and inspiration to us, in our efforts to understand Theorem 2. Finally, in Sect. 8 we discuss briefly several related constructions of harmonic maps of surfaces into certain higher dimensional homogeneous spaces. I . Homotopy Classification of Maps Between Surfaces Any compact connected surface A/{ + S) without boundary is differentiably the connected sum ( # ) of projective planes and tori; accordingly, its fundamental group 7E,(M) is presented by generators {a^ g ; „ (b ,c ) ^ ^ subject to the single relation {J7 a?} (njlbjcpj cJ '))= 1. If M is orientable, it is a sum of p tori, where p = genus(M); thus there are no u/s in the presentation of 7t,(M). If M is nonorientable, it admits different representations; for instance, T#P=P#P#P; we choose to realise M as a sum ofk projective planes, k is called the genus of M, and %(M) is generated by ( a ^ , < subject to the relation TIaf=l. For any two compact connected smooth surfaces M, N without boundary, consider the space ^(M,N) of maps M-*N; these can be of any class C" for Ogn g
l
(
ifii
J
J
l
j
m
94 Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
29
goo, unless otherwise specified. The components of ^{M,N) are the homotopy classes, the set of which we denote by [Af, JV]. The following enumeration [in (A)] and classification [in (B)] results on homotopy classes are well known: (A) Enumeration of \_M,N~} Case N + S or P [21]. Two homomorphisms 0, 0':7t (M)--7r (JV) are said to be conjugate (8^6') if there is an element ben,(N) such that 6'{a) = b~ 6(a)b for all aen^M). Any continuous map M-*N induces a conjugacy class of homomorphisms from rc (M) to n^N). When N + S or P, these conjugacy classes are canonically identified with the components of '4{M, N): 1
1
l
1
mm
(1.1)
*
HoMnJMU^N))/^)).
Case N = S [8]. Then the assignment tp-'d^, ( = the degree or degree mod2 of
[M,S~\^H\M;1)=%
if hi is orientable, — 2l if Af is nonorientable. 2
CaserV = P [ 8 , 34]. Then 1
Hom(7r, (Af), n^PM ») = Hom(7r, (Af), E ) = H (Af; J, ). 2
2
Using that identification we say that a homomorphism 0 ;it {M)-*7i (P) is oriented if 0 = Wj(A/) (=the first Stiefel-Whitney class of Af); and nonorientable otherwise. Geometrically, 0 is oriented if the maps d> which induce it are oriented; i.e., if when X is an orientation-preserving (-reversing) loop of Af, then d>°k is an orientationpreserving (-reversing) loop of N. Equivalently, let S'p-^P denote the orientation sheaf of P; then 0 is oriented iff Q~ 3~ = 3~ . The classification of [Al, P] is thus partitioned into two subclasses depending on the orientability of the induced homomorphisms. Note that being given 0 is equivalent to being given a homotopy class M->P" for any n £ 3 ; and we are asked to classify those elements 0 of [Af, P"] which have image in [Af, P] under the inclusion map P-»P". l
l
1
f
M
a) 0 is oriented. Then 6 is represented by infinitely many homotopy classes: these are parametrised by the absolute value of the twisted degree d. It takes the values t/s0mod2 if Af is orientable; t/s genus (Af) mod 2 if M is nonorientable. b) 0 Is nonorientable. Then 0 is represented either by 1 or by 2 homotopy classes in [Af, P ] , as follows: If the degree mod2 d (ff)=l, then we have 1 class (equivalently, Sq 0 + 0, as Epstein has noted); rfj(0) = O, then we have 2 classes (equivalently, Sq' 0 = 0); these being parametrised by H (M,8-'3r ) = z. . 1
2
2
p
2
(B) Classification of\M,N'\. The only case not covered in (A) is that of b) with d 6 = 0. We must determine how to distinguish those two cases. 2
95 30
J . Eells and L . Lemaire
One method is as follows [4]: Given two maps ^ d> rel. x iff d E Image a , where a is a homomorphism 0
0
1
M i
2
a
0
i
0
M i
9
9
(in the notation of [4]) defined via the boundary operator in the homotopy exact sequence of the fibration ^(Af, P J - ^ A f ' ^ P ) defined by restriction. In the case under consideration, we know [34] that there are two classes so that image a = 2ZC? _ and the homotopy classes relative to x representing 8 are in bijective correspondence with coker a = Z . Olum's description [34, 33, 35] of the classes determining 8 is as follows: Subdivide Af into a simplicial complex with ordered vertices (x,|, with x as first vertex. For each i choose a path U from x to x and for any ordered 1-simplex x Xj define y^^K^M^a) by VfajX^V]'. Construct the simplicial map g :M-
9
0
fl
2
0
j
0
f
t
iOI
g
0
a
111
(x x )-»y (
y
if
0 !
(x,.X;HP< >
6(y{x x )) = e i
if
]
0
OiyiXfX^e,.
1
Here P " is a projective line in P representing e EiiA.P,y ); e is the neutral element of n {P,y^\. If (XfXjXj is an ordered 2-simplex and i
0
0
Y
111
,L
then define a to be a homeomorphism onto P —P . Otherwise, map Then g represents 8, and d (g ) — d {8). Finally, define the map
{x x x )-'P '.
9
e
2
e
i
j
y
2
p-.n^y^HHM^-'^,,)
by
/f(e-,) = obstmction to deforming g to g with x traversing P description of /J(e,): Assign - 1 to (XjXjX,) if B
e
0
l n
[Alternative
9(v(x,x ))- =%(x xJ); ;
ei
;
and 0 otherwise. I.e., /?(e,) = 0if an even number of — 1 are assigned; and /!(£,)= 1 if an odd number of —1 are assigned.] Then j3 is a crossed homomorphism pVw') = $w) + w<./?(*"), 2
l
where «denotes the action ofn,(P,y )on H (M ;8~ 3~ ); consequently, it partitions H^M-J-'Pp), the orbit of h being 0
C(fc) = { ^ ) + ^ ^ : w
e f r i
P
(P,y )}. 0
Thus C(0)={0,/J( )}, e(l)={l,P(e )+e ol}. ei
Case / ^ H O .
T
h
e
n
1
1
C(0)={0}, C(I)={1}. This is the case deg g = 0. 2
9
31
Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
Case /J(e,)=l. Then C(0)= (0,1} = C{1). This is the case deg g„ = l . 2
(C) Asurjective map d>:M->N between surfaces is a branched cover if it is finite-toone and open. A branched cover is an oriented map, in the sense that it preserves the I ' Stiefel-Whitney classes: >*w (/V)=w (M). s
J
9
1
1
The following is well known; if N is not S or P and d>\M->N is a branched cover, then its induced homomorphism tp^ :n: (M)-'n (N) is injective iff 0 is unramified; i.e., is a covering map. l
l
Indeed, the sufficiency is standard in the theory of covering spaces. For the necessity, let 9:N-*N be the unramified covering associated to the subgroup 4>^n,(M)) of jt,(rV> Then
is injective.
Here \d^\ is the absolute degree. As the notation suggests, jd^j is the absolute value of the usual degree when Af and N are orientable. It has been shown recently [6] that if Af and A/are orientable with genus (Af)^d •genus (AOfor some integer
x
+
1
1
2. Harmonic Maps of Surfaces Background references: see [15, 16]. If
m m = \ m f ^
where the vertical bars indicate the Hilbert-Schmidt norm of the linear map (the differential of
(2.2) Bm=Smm&-
)
97 32
J. Eells and L . Lemaire
A smooth map 4>e^{M, N) is harmonic if it is an extremal of E. Thus it satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equation (2-3)
T<0)=O,
where x(cp) = Trace Vdd, is the tension of <j>. Suppose that M and N are surfaces. Then we can introduce isothermal charts relative to the Riemannian metrics g and h. Calling z, z (resp. w, w) the complex variable and its conjugate in these charts, we can write g = Q (z)dzdz, h = G {w)dwdw. Then 2
(2.4)
£(0)=,|rj»[|wj * M
2
1
3
+ |vv | ]^i, 5
In particular, we note that i / M and N are orientable and tp :M-*. N is holomorphic or antiholomorphic relative to the complex structures determined by g and h, then
4>\ ) Z
C
Re(z") + (|z|'); 0
c l m ^ + oflzl*); oi\z\*) for
aS3;
see [19] for further details. If both M and N are surfaces, then a branched immersion is a branched covering. // cp is harmonic and its Jacobian J ^ S O on M, then
98
Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
(2.7) Corollary. If
K (N)=0 2
(i.e., JV* S or P) then every homotopy class Jt?e [Af, jV]
has a harmonic representative
cp:(M,g)-*(N,h).
3. Maps Between Spheres and Projective Planes When Af and N are spheres or projective planes, equipped with any given Riemannian metrics, we have a complete description of all harmonic maps.
(A) Maps from Sphere to Sphere
First we recall the description of the harmonic maps in question [28, 42]:
3
or
If these quotients are irreducible and a, #0, bj+0, then the degree of such a map is + maxfr, s). All degrees are thereby represented.
(B) Maps from Projective Plane to Sphere
There are two homotopy classes of maps from P to S, one of which contains the constant maps. (3.3) Proposition. Any harmonic map d>:(P,g)~-(S,h) is constant. In particular, the nontrivial homotopy class does not contain a harmonic representative.
Proof. Let tp be harmonic. Composition of
gives a
(S,p*g)
(P,0)-*> (S,h) 3
2
The degree of d> is 0, for its induced homomorphism tp*:H (S)->/f (S) factors through H (P)=Z . Since any harmonic map {S,p*g)-*(S,h) has the form (3.1) or (3.2), we conclude that
2
99 J. Eells and L. Lemaire (C) Maps from Sphere to Projective Plane Any map tp :S-»P lifts to a map 0: (S,p*h) (S,g)
(P,h)-
The twisted degree of
1
1
(S,p*g) 4 {S,p*h) (P,g)
$
(P,h).
Since rb is harmonic it is conformal, together with
wi-lzy^-Wz))- . If
&,=(-!)'5,
[We do not have to consider maps given by (3.2), for they project on the same class of 0's.] All classes are represented harmonically (for instance, by the maps w — z ); and we obtain an explicit description of every harmonic map. The second family, associated to the zero morphism $:n (P)-*n {P), contains two homotopy classes, including the trivial one. All maps in these classes lift to maps from P to .9, and any such harmonic map is constant [as shown in (3.3)]. In summary: 4
1
l
(3.5) Proposition. There are two families of homotopy classes of maps from (P,g) to (P, h). The first contains an infinite number of classes, all of which contain harmonic
100 Harmonic and Hoiomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
35
representatives. These are given by (3.1), subject to condition (3.4). The second contains two homotopy classes: The trivial class, in which every harmonic map is constant; and a class which contains no harmonic representative. 4. Maps of a Surface to a Sphere When M is not a sphere or a projective plane, we have only partial existence results; therefore we shall concentrate on the following question [28]: Given two compact surfaces Atf and N and a homotopy class 3^ of maps from M to N, does contain a map which can be rendered harmonic by a suitable choice of Riemannian metrics on M and N ? In other words, do there exist metrics on M and N such that #f contains a map harmonic with respect to these metrics? (A) Maps from an Orientable Surface to the Sphere For completeness, we first recall the known results concerning the harmonic maps from an orientable surface to the sphere; let p — genusM. The homotopy classes of maps M-»S are parametrised by the degree d of the maps, and it is shown in [17] that for \d\ ^p any harmonic map of degree d is + holomorphic. Such maps exist in the following cases: if \d\^p+l; if \d\ = p and M is nonhyperelliptic (i.e., the associated Riemann surface is not a holomorphic 2-sheeted branched covering of S); if \d\ = p is even. On the other hand, when \d\ = p is odd and M is hyperelliptic, there is no + holomorphic map of degree d from M to S; and hence no harmonic map in these classes. For the remaining degrees, it is known [26,28,29] that if Af is a surface of genus p and \d\ g p — 1, there exist metrics on M and S such that there is a harmonic non + holomorphic map from M to S of degree d. This map is not an absolute minimum of the energy in the class. These results provide the following answer to the rendering problem [28]: (4.1) Proposition. Let Mbea surface ofgenus p and d an integer. There exist metrics g and honM and S and a harmonic map d> :(M,g)^{S,h) of degree d in all cases except when p— \ and \d\ — 1. (B) Maps from a Nonorientable Surface to the Sphere In contrast to (3.3): (4.2) Theorem. Let Mbea nonorientable surface of genus k S: 2 and S a sphere. There exist metrics on M and S such that the (unique) nontrivial homotopy class of maps from MtoS contains a harmonic representative. As above, this map is not an absolute minimum of the energy in that class. Proof. The difTerentiable manifold M is a connected sum of k projective planes; we shall represent it as a connected sum M of hemispheres, quotiented by the identification of antipodal points on each boundary circle L,(t—1,k).
101 36
J . Eells and L. Lemaire
We equip Af with a metric inducing a smooth metric on Af such that Af appears as a surface in R symmetric with respect to k + 1 planes, one of them orthogonal to the k others; and these forming equal angles. We call („,/;,...,/,, the lines of intersection of these planes with Af and S (s = 0, ...,fe) the symmetry with respect to / (see Fig. 1, where / is in the plane of the paper). On S we choose the metric of a surface of revolution symmetric with respect to its equator (for example, the Euclidean metric). We call the equator /'„ and choose k meridians forming equal angles, put in correspondence with the l and called t' (see Fig. 1). We denote by S' the symmetry with respect to Finally, we associate to each boundary circle L , a point P, on S as indicated in Fig. 1. 3
s
s
0
3
s
s
We note that if k is even and k>2 it would be sufficient for the construction below to impose symmetry with respect to k/2+1 lines (see Fig. 2 for k = 4):
Fig. 1
Adapting the method of [28, Sect. 11], we shall use the direct method of the calculus of variations to find a harmonic map of degree one 0:Af-»S, equivariant with respect to the groups of symmetries, and mapping L , on P,. Then we shall check that 4> induces a C -harmonic map from Af to S. i) Following [32, Sect. 9.4], we say that a measurable map
2
J
102 Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
37
ii) Let us say that a map 0 :M-»S satisfying rpS = S' <j>(s = 0 k) is equivariant. Consider a minimising sequence {0 } for the energy functional E in the class of equivariant L^-maps sending L , to P,. (An Z?i-map has an L trace on L,.) First of all, we observe that we can replace {0 } by another minimising sequence {4>' } in the same class, where 0J has the additional property of mapping (almost everywhere) a region of M bounded by three lines of symmetry and a piece of L , in the corresponding region of S (see Fig. 3): s
s
f
1
r
r
ill
Fig. 3
For that it suffices to associate to each
r
r
2
2
r
v
2
r
2
£(0)£liminfE(0;) [32, Lemmas 9.4.16 and-9.4.15]. iv) In each region, 0 minimises E with respect to the Dirichlet problem induced by its trace on the boundary. By a fundamental theorem of Morrey ([31] or [32, Theorem 9.4.2]) 0 is C™ in the interior of the region. v) We observe that the method of [31, 32] enables us to prove that 0 is continuous on each line of symmetry, away from the intersections with the other lines or the Z.,'s. Indeed, for two sufficiently nearby points on such a line, the proof will involve only discs centred on the image of the line in an exponential chart; and the fact that 0 minimises E in such a disc amongst the equivariant maps is sufficient for us to proceed with the proof (see [28, Sect. 12] for details).
103 38
J. Eells and L. Lemaire
On each line L„ $ is continuous by construction, for it has constant image P,. By the boundary statement of [32, Theorem 9.4.2], 4> ' therefore continuous everywhere, except perhaps at the intersections of two lines of symmetry or one line of symmetry and one L , . vi) By identification of the antipodal points on the L,'s, $ induces a map d>:M-*S with the same continuity properties. In a small enough disc centred at a point on a line of symmetry, we know by construction that
t
r
0
,p (x,y)=-rp°(-x y). !
Conversely, a map d> satisfying these relations also satisfies d>"(0,y)—0; i.e., <j> is obtained from a map 0of a neighbourhood of a point of L , to S such that 0(Z,,) - P,. A minimum of E for the given Dirichlet problem is therefore a minimum of E in the class of equivariant maps for these new relations. vii) Using this, we now show that (except at the intersection points) <j> is weakly harmonic; i.e., d> satisfies x(4>) — 0 in a weak sense. If D is an open neighbourhood of a point such that D does not contain a point of intersection,
X + ^X
X-£r*X
=X,+X ; 2
P
thus SfX =X and S X =-X . Then V E(d>) = 0, because X , induces a variation in the class of equivariant maps and
l
2
2
Xi
= F_ E(0)--f £(0), K2
X)
hence V E{d>) = 0. viii) Except perhaps at the points of intersection of the symmetry lines, tb's weakly harmonic and continuous. Therefore it is C " [41]. By a theorem [37] on removable singularities,
s
104
Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
39
5. Maps of a Surface to a Projective Plane (A) Maps from an Orientable Surface M-*P Consider first the zero morphism din^Mj-m^P). It is oriented, and therefore is induced from an infinite number of homotopy classes. Any map 0 inducing 8 lifts to a map 0: S
V M
r
1 P
The degree of 0 is twice that of 0, and the nonnegative even numbers parametrise the possible homotopy classes. (The classes of maps 0 of degrees k and - k project to the same class with absolute value of the degree 2k.) All statements made about the maps from M to S in Sect. 4 A apply therefore to the maps from M to P (the notion of oriented holomorphy being replaced by that of conformality). Suppose now that 8 is a nonoriented morphism. It is induced by two homotopy classes, and Theorem (2.6) shows that one of them contains a harmonic map, which minimises E in the union of the two. Unfortunately, that general statement does not indicate which class is represented. Independently we have the (5.1) Proposition. One of the classes associated to 8 can be represented by a harmonic map whose image is a geodesic. Proof. The morphism 8 is characterised by specifying the images of the generators {b„c^ of it,(Af) in B (P) = Z = {* ,e }. i
2
0
I
We can define a morphism from jr (Af) to 2 by mapping the generators sent to e onto 0 and those sent to e onto 1. The relation nbfifc 'c " = 1 is preserved by that map, which therefore induces a homomorphism. Its composition with the morphism from 2 to 2 , defined by (0, l)-*(e , t ) is the given homomorphism 8. To the morphism 7t,(M)-*Z is associated a homotopy class of maps from M to S , which contains a harmonic representative. Its composition with a map from S' to a non con tract ible geodesic of P is harmonic and induces the homomorphism 8. We do not know whether this geodesic minimises E in the union of the two classes associated to 8. It is not excluded that the answer to that question would depend on the metric of M. Concerning the other homotopy class associated to 0, we have results only for certain morphisms. For instance, if 8 is defined by mapping every b to e and every c, toe,,a construction using symmetries as in Sect. 4B yields a harmonic map for certain metrics, as indicated on Fig. 4. (Here the genus is 3 and the boundary circle L, is identified with I*.) An equivariant map is built from the surface with boundary to S mapping the boundary circle L,(L*) onto P,(P*). It factors as a map 0 from M to P, inducing the given morphism. One verifies easily that the separation element of a suitably chosen map homotopic to 0 and a harmonic map inducing the same morphism and whose image is ageodesic.is the generator of n (P). (l.B) implies then that these two maps are not homotopic (free and based homotopy coincide in this case). t
0
1
l
;
e
3
0
1
t
2
0
105 40
J. Eells and L. Lemaire
Fig. 4
L',
This construction is valid for any genus M = p>0. When studying the rendering problem, we can compose the harmonic map
(
t
r
t
L
Fig. 5
Variants for these constructions allow us to treat other homomorphisms, but do not seem to lead to a complete solution to the rendering problem in all classes in [M,P]. (B) Maps from a Nonorientable Surface M->P: Oriented Homomorphisms Let M b e a nonorientable surface of genus k^2 and 8:n (M)->n lP) the oriented morphism. To 8 is associated an infinite number of homotopy classes of maps M-*P, parametrised by the absolute value of the twisted degree, which takes all even (resp., odd) values if k is even (resp., odd). l
1
(5.2) Proposition. For any homotopy class of maps from M to P determining the oriented morphism, there exist metrics on M and P such that the class contains a harmonic map. Except when the degree is 1 the metric on P can be prescribed.
41
Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
Proof. First of all, we treat the case of degrees > 1 and prove that for all k and d 2: 2 there is a d-sheeted branched covering of P by a surface of genus k. Since the projection map of any branched covering is oriented [14, Theorem 5:2], these maps are in the prescribed homotopy classes. For a given metric on P, they can be made conformal (hence hannonic) by the choice of suitable conformal structures on M. We shall have to use two different constructions, according to the parities of k and d. i) d — 2a^2. We consider two copies of (P,h) and a—\ copies of S, viewed as Riemannian universal covering of {P,h}. We glue these copies together along s segments, s^a. Thus we cut the two first copies along the same segment (i.e., two segments such that one is the copy of the other) and join them crosswise along the slit. Then we adjoin the other copies, one at a time, using different segments; and attach the last one along the s - a +1 remaining segments. This defines a branched covering 0 : M — P which can be lifted to a branched covering of the oriented two sheeted coverings: M
s
£•
I M 4
I P.
0 is a d-sheeted branched covering of S by M , obtained by joining copies of S along 2s segments. Its ramification index f is hence 4s. Using Hurwitz' formula X(M) + r = 2a (S) X
(where x denotes the Euler characteristic) we obtain the genus of M, denoted by y(M)
k:2-k
= x(M)= ^ y ^ = 2 o - 2 s ; k=2s + 2-2a. Therefore k takes all positive
even values. Conversely, for any such k we obtain any positive value of a, and hence represent all classes associated to a positive degree (necessarily even). ii) d = 2a +1 £ 3. We repeat the construction, this time using a copies of S and one copy of P; for the genus of the branched covering we obtain k = 2s +1 - 2a. Thus k takes all positive odd values; and for any such k we get all positive values of a and represent all classes associated to a (necessarily) odd degree S 3. iii) Degree 0. k must be even and the class of maps of degree 0 can be represented by a harmonic map whose image is a closed geodesic. Indeed, let [a^ , be a set of generators of T C ( M ) , subject to the relation l=
t
1
naf=i We define a homomorphism from 7i,(M) to Z by mapping half the a,'s to 1 and the others to - 1 . Therefore the relation is preserved. The composition of this morphism with that from Z to Z defined by (0, l)-»(e , f.^) maps all a,'s to e,, and hence is oriented. Thus we ohtain the harmonic map as in the proof of Proposition (5.1). 2
0
iv) Degree i. (This case cannot be treated as in ii), for a branched covering of degree 1 would be a diffeomorphism.)
107 42
J. Eells and L. Lemaire
The two-sheeted orientable covering M of M is of even genus p = k — 1. As in Fig. 6 let us equip M with a metric symmetric with respect to three planes and S with a metric possessing the same symmetries (for instance the Euclidean metric):
Kg. 6
Using the same technique as in Sect. 4B, it was shown in [26, 28] that there is a harmonic map of degree one from M to S, equivariant with respect to the groups of symmetries. The line I, is sent onto l\ and the equivariance with respect to S S and S' S' implies that antipodal points of /, are mapped to antipodal points of f By identification of antipodal points, we obtain a harmonic map from a surface to P. Because this surface contains a Moebius strip, it is nonorientable and hence of genus k. 0
0
2
2
v
(C) Maps from a Nonorientable Surface A/->P: Nonoriented homomorphisms Let M be a nonorientable surface whose fundamental group is generated by =!
*•
(5.3) Proposition. Let 8 be a nonoriented homomorphism from JI,(M) to 7r,(P), mapping an odd number of the a,'s toe . There is precisely one homotopy class whose maps induce 8, and it contains a harmonic map. i
This is an immediate consequence of Theorem (1.1). Note that these maps do not factor through the circle as geodesies, because they must be of degree d = 1. When 8 maps an even number of a 's on e „ it is induced by two distinct homotopy classes. As in Sect. 3C we see that one of these classes contains a harmonic map minimising E in the union of the two classes; one of the classes contains a harmonic map whose image is a geodesic. 2
f
In the special case of the zero homomorphism, the associated maps lift to maps from M to S; and thus for certain metrics, both classes are represented, by Theorem (4-2). For certain other morphisms, constructions as in Sect. 5A give representatives in both classes; but again this does not seem to lead to a complete solution to the rendering problem.
43
Hannonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
(D) Example. Maps from the Klein bottle K-*P The fundamental group of K is generated by the elements a and a , subject to the relation a\a\ — 1. There are four homomorphisms from n^M) to n,(P), determined by the images of a and a . We have the following existence properties for these homomorphisms, thus solving the rendering problem: i
1
a
a
e
2
2
e
i) ( i, )~*( o> or- There are two homotopy classes associated with this morphism, composed of maps which lift to S. One of them contains the constant maps (which are harmonic). The other contains a harmonic map for certain metrics, deduced from a remark of Sect. 5C or from the explicit construction of Sect. 7B below. 2
(ii) (a a )^>(e ,e )or (e e ). There is only one homotopy class associated to each of these morphisms, and it always contains harmonic map by Proposition (5.3). v
2
0
l
v
0
We remark that if P carries the Euclidean metric (induced from its universal cover Sj, then such a map can be built explicitly (see Sect. 7B below). iii) (a ,a )-*(e ,e ). To this oriented morphism is associated an infinite number of homotopy classes of maps K->P; these are parametrised by the absolute value of the degree, taking only even values. l
2
1
1
For ti=0, the homotopy class can always be represented by a geodesic. For
6. Examples of Harmonic Gauss Maps Certain homotopy classes in [M, S] can be rendered harmonic as Gauss maps, as follows: The Grassmannian of oriented planes through the origin in R is the homogeneous space a
G ° = SO(4)/SO(2)xSO(2). 2
As a projective variety it is the complex quadric. It can also be described [12] as 2
4
G%_ = {xeA ]t\ :W\ 2
1
= l
and
OIACC-O}. Z
4
The de Rham-Hodge star operator on 2-vectors is an involution (setting A = A R )
109 44
J . Eells and L . Lemaire
with eigenspaces A corresponding to the eigenvalues ± 1 ; the oriented plane ae G° is sent by * into its oriented orlhogonal complement *a. Thus we have the orthogonal direct sum decomposition A=A ®A_ into 3-dimensional Euclidean subspaces. If we decompose each a€G^_ into the indicated form a = a +a_, then ot eS , the unit spheres in A . Thus we have a diffeomorphism ft :Gj{ - > S x S_ defined by fi(a) = (a ,a_). If ( e ) - is an orthonormal base for fR and we set e — e Ae then (e + e )/\/2, {e,i + e )f^2, (e + e )/}/2 is an orthonormal base for A . Let us note in passing that ±
2
+
+
2
±
±
±
2
+
4
+
k
p
;
12
1Sl
S4
i4
tJ
2A
ia
2i
±
f i ° * ° f c ( a , a _ ) = ( « , — ct_). _1
+
+
In fact, h is an isometric biholomorphic equivalence between these two EinsteinKahler symmetric spaces; see [24; Chap. XI, Exercise 10.6]. We note also that S x S_ is naturally minimally embedded in the sphere S( |/2) of radius \/2 in A; thus we find G° embedded in A with constant mean curvature. +
2
4
(6.1) Let M be a closed oriented surface embedded in 1R , with Gaussmapy .M — G\ . If c eH (G° _ \7L) are the images under h* of the generators in H {S ;Z), then 2
1
2
±
2
(6.2)
±
y*( )[Af> (Af)/2, C±
2
where x(M) is the Euler characteristic of M. That is a theorem of Blaschke [7]; we sketch the proof given in [12]: Let CBH (G% ; Z ) be the Chern class of the canonical circle bundle over G\ . Then c = c + c_. If y is the Gauss tangent map, then *°y is the Gauss normal map, and y*c and (* °y)*c are the Euler classes of the tangent and normal bundles of M in fR . Then ;t(M) = (y*c) [ M ] = ( y * c ) [M]+(y*c_) [A/]. On the other hand, since Af is embedded in IR , 0=(*°y)*c[A/] = ( j * c ) [ M ] - ( y * c _ ) [A/]. The equation (6.1) follows. Now we apply that result to certain of Lawson's surfaces [25]. For every pair of integers m^k^l he has constructed an oriented surface gLj of gen us mk with Euler characteristic j,) = 2(l -mk), minimally embedded in S . If y is the composition 2
2
2
+
4
t
4
+
3
±
where n denotes the indicated projection, then (6.1) shows that deg(y )= 1 -mk. A theorem of Ruh and Vilms [36] asserts that a submanifold isometricaily immersed in IR" has constant mean curvature iff its Gauss map is harmonic. Since t; is minimally embedded in S , it has constant mean curvature in IR , so y is a harmonic map. The composition rz °h is totally geodesic, so the composition map y 'i , -*S is harmonic. In summar,y/or every closed orientable surface Af of genus M — p, the homotopy class in [M, S] of degree 1 — p can be rendered harmonic via the above procedure involving Gauss maps. Of course, we could have started with the polar map d>- :Af->S of the immersion 0:M-*S , described in [25, Sect. 10] as follows: Set d> =d>, and let ±
±
mk
i
4
±
±
n k
3
3
+
110 Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Belween Surfaces
45
a e T ( M ) be the unit 2-vector of the orientation of T [M): then define 0_(x)eS_ by 0_(x) = *(0(x)Aa(T^ (jW)). If tp is minimal, then d>_ is a harmonic map with a finite number of branch points. Let us note that if we treat 0 <x)eIR , then y(x) = 0 ( x ) A
Hxy
U)
4
±
+
2
m k
3
4
4
m
k
i
2
4
2
a 2
tl
^ 4 , 2 ~ (S+ xS_)/(i),
where
i(a , «_) = ( — a , a _ ) . +
+
Remark. For a simply connected complete minimally immersed surface M in IR which is not a hyperplane, Chern [11] has shown that the maps y :M-*S are — holomorphic and have dense images. ±
7. Surfaces of Constant Mean Curvature in IR
4
±
3
(A) Gauss Maps of Branched Immersions 3
{7.1} Proposition. Let M be a Riemann surface, and 0 : M - - I R a branched immersion. Then d> has constant mean curvature iff its Gauss map y:Af-»S is harmonic. That is established in general in [36] for nonsingular immersions. In the present case it is an elementary matter to verify that the Gauss map y is continuous on all M, and (2.6) and (2.10) of [23] imply that it is C and hence smooth; indeed, dy the seond fundamental form of
(7.2) Harm(M,S)/Iso(S) denote the set of equivalence classes of harmonic maps M-*S, two % y being equivalent iff there is an orientation-preserving isometry a of S such that y — a"y. Similarly, let 3
(7.3) Brim^M.^l/IsolIR ) denote the set of equivalence classes of branched immersions with constant mean curvature H. Thus we have the canonical map (7.4)
3
3
Brim^M, R )/Iso(IR )-» Harm(M, S)/Iso(S).
It follows from [1] that this is injective, provided tf#0; that restriction is well known to be necessary, for the catenoid and the helicoid have the same Gauss map. Let us also observe that by Sampson's unique continuation theorem [38], if there is an open UcM and ceSO(3) such that =a
y\v ''y\v< then y =ff->yon all M.
Ill 46
J . Eells and L. Lemaire
Suppose now that M is complete and simply connected; and H is a positive number. Then with every harmonic map y\M-*S there is an explicitly given branched immersion
2
_1
tb(z) = 2Re Ay o s
+ c,
z
where 2
A=
3
(A\A ,A ) 1
2
. -(1-y )
i(l + y )
-2y
nti+wv
\m+MT
H(i+m
We note that we have the conformality condition i
2
1
1
1
(A ) +(A ) -r(A )
2
= Q;
and 1
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
K | + | ^ | + | ^ | = 2//7 (l + | y | ) ; and furthermore, d> satisfies the mean curvature equation ,,_/4Rey
4Imy
U+Irr"
2
2(\y\ -l)\ i+lvl
2
/
on all M. In particular, (7.6) Proposition [23]. For any Riemann surface M, H>0, and harmonic map y.M-rS, we have a canonically defined branched immersion d>:M-*IR with constant mean curvature H. 3
Here M denotes the universal cover of M. 3
Example. If
1
3
WM ^IR . r
These are the associated surfaces of <j>. Presumably this is just the case of y associated with d>.
±
:M-*S
(B) The Gauss Map of Delaunay's Nodoid
In his Thesis [40] Smith constructed analytically certain harmonic maps from certain tori T-rS; these have degree 0, although some of them are surjective. In fact, suppose that T is a flat rectangular torus, expressed as R/flZ x R / 2 J I Z ;
±
112 Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
and (S,/i ) the Euclidean sphere of radius I. Let (x,y)e[0,a] x [0,2;r] be Euclidean coordinates on T, and (r,8) polar coordinates on S. A map d>:T--S of the form r =
(7.7)
1
dx
= sin $ cos*.
For a>2n an oscillatory movement of the pendulum of period a induces a harmonic map of degree 0 covering a band around the equator of S. For a suitable choice of coordinates the lines x = 0 and x = a/2 are fold lines of the map. For any value of a, a revolutive movement of the pendulum of period a/2 induces a twice surjective harmonic map of degree 0 from T to S, sending the collapse lines x = 0 and x = a/2 on the poles of S. Calabi has indicated to us that Smith's maps can be interpreted as the Gauss maps of the unduloid and the nodoid of Delaunay [13], see [16, Sect. 11.7] and [44]. The Klein bottle K has the representation as a connected sum of two projective planes; or as a cylinder with antipodal points of its boundary circles identified. Figure 7 is meant to indicate how this representation is related to the usual one:
Fig. 7
A map of the cylinder to S of the form r = $(x), 8 = y subject to the conditions
Using the method of Sect. 4, we see that a nonorientable surface M of even genus can be realised as a 3-sheeted branched covering of K. A suitable choice of conformal structure on M makes the projection conformal; and composition with the hannonic map K—S just constructed produces another harmonic map of degree 1 mod 2 from a surface of even genus to S. To obtain the explicit representation of the harmonic maps K—P announced in Sect. 5Dii), where P is given its Euclidean metric, we choose again Euclidean coordinates (x,y) on K and polar coordinates (r,6j on S:
113 4N
J. Eells and L. Lemaire
Ji X
Fig. 8
a A map tp from the rectangle of Fig, 8 to S of the form dt(x, y) = (4>(x), y) is harmonic iff * satisfies (7.7). A solution exists satisfying the conditions *(0) = 0,
8. On Harmonic Maps of Surfaces into Various Homogeneous Spaces Consider harmonic maps (b of S or P into the Euclidean n-sphere S", with n £ 3. In that case tp is a minimal branched immersion by (2.7). 3
(8.1) Every harmonic map tp.S—S factors through a totally geodesic map of an equator into S ; thus their classification reduces to that given in Sect. 3A. See Almgren [2]. In general, we have Calabi's theorem [9, 10; see also 3] that if S—*S ~ '(r)C R" is a minimal branched immersion and if the image lies in no hyperpiane o/R". then n is odd. 3
n
3
(8.2) Every harmonic map
3
s
5
2
i
immerses S (\j 3) isometrically into S ; and factors to produce ihe desired minimal embedding of P into S . Since every map tp-S--P" lifts to one into S", their consideration reduces to that of the previous case. 4
(8.3) We have Calabi's and Barbosa's theorem [3] '.Assigning the direct ix i^to a map
2k
114 Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
49
harmonic maps
lk
2
(8.4) Every harmonic map
3
is either constant
or factors
through a totally
3
Indeed, lift to S %
S
3
i I p ^ p • 3
now 4> factors, and hence so does
0*0. The maps [25, Theorem 3] (for any positive integers r, s) <£„(*,, x ) = (cosrxj cosxj, sinrx, cosx , cossxjsinxj, sinsx sinx ) are minimal isometric immersions of T=IR/27t2 x R/2JTZ into S . The m a p ^ , defines the Clifford torus T - » S ; (1,1) is the only pair giving an embedding. The map
2
1
2
3
3
s
3
In general [22], if
We obtain minimal immersions of T and K into P" by composition. (8.6) On the other hand, we recall a theorem of Frankel [ 1 8 ] : The inclusion map i of a minimal embedding of a compact hypersurface induces an epimorphism i :jtj(Af)-»jij(W);
M into a space N with Ricci
N>0
#
Therefore (8.7) Any minimal embedding never lifts into S .
into P
3
is homotopically
non trivial;
in particular, it
3
By Corollary (2.7) we obtain: (8.8) The homotopy classes of maps [ M , P"] = H {M; Z )f representatives, since n (P")—0 for n £ 3 . L
2
or
"=
3
a
l
1
have
harmonic
2
As specific examples, Lawson [25] has shown that every orientable M can be minimally embedded in P"(n^3), provided genus M > 0 . Furthermore, every minimal immersion of a compact surface into P" represents a nontrivial homotopy class. (8.9)
Suppose genus M S I ;
then there is no stable minimal immersion of M into S or 3
P . That is a consequence of a theorem of Schoen and Yau [39], which asserts the 3
115
50
J. Eells and L . Lemaire
same conclusion for range any compact oriented 3-manifold with positive scalar curvature. Before considering examples of harmonic maps M->W, let us note the r+ 1
+ 1
(8.10) Lemma. The natural embedding IR C C " given by (x , ...,x,)-<-(x ,..., x,, 0,..., 0) induces a totally real, totally geodesic embedding n: P -*IP" .furthermore n is homotopically nontrivial. 0
0
r
A real vector subspace W of a complex vector space (V,J) is totally real if J{ W)r\ W—0. A real submanifold of a complex manifold is said to be totally real if its tangent spaces are all totally real. Proof. The first assertions are immediate. To prove the final statement it suffices to consider the case*; ;P-»IP . Note that the tangent vector bundle of IP restricted toP decomposes: 2
2
r ( P % = T(P)e-/7'fP). Then n ^ T n ^ n - ' m ^(TW
2
, ) + wJTiPVvw^jnPV
+ WziJTiP))
2
= w (T(P)) = w (r
2
where 1 denotes the generator of H (P, Z). n
(8.11) Proposition. The composition n°d>:M-*P harmonic. If n = 2,
with any harmonic map
deg (0) = deg b7°
2
(8.12) There are many nonconstant harmonic maps S->rP". They are all minimal branched immersions; they are not ail ± holomorphic, but are necessarily strongly pseudoholomorphic, in the sense of Wood. Holomorphic examples are provided by rational functions. Note also that for each n2:2 the composition s i r P is a nonconstant harmonic map of degree 0; in particular, it is not + holomorphic. (8.13) For 2 we have [P, P"] = Z . Lemma (8.10) shows that the nontrivial class is harmonically represented by ff :P-*P ->IP". 2
2
l
l
3
(8.14) The natural embedding S {l/]/3) x S\\l]/l) X S {lfl/3>) in C is a minimal 3-torus in the unit sphere S . The natural action of C(l) on S induces a minimal embedding of a flat torus in P , which is totally real, but not totally geodesic [30]: 5
s
2
S ( V J/3) x S*(l/|/3) x S\XI]/% J
4 r
-» S
5
1" 4
2
• IP .
116
Harmonic and Holomorphic Maps Between Surfaces
51
The left-hand vertical arrow represents a trivial [/(l)-bundle, so 0 is a null homotopic map.
Acknowledgements. During the preparation of this paper the authors enjoyed the hospitality of the Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientiftques. The first-named (J.E.I thanks the Universite de Paris VI, where he wasProfesseur d'Echange. The secon d-named (L.L.) is Charge de recherches au Fonds National Beige de la Recherche Scientifique.
References t. Abe, K., Erbacher, J . : Isometric immersions with the same Gauss map. Math. Ann. 215, 197-201 (1975) 2. Almgren, F.J.: Some interior regularity theorems for minimal surfaces and an extension of Bernstein's theorem. Ann. of Math. 84, 277-292 (1966) 3. Barbosa, J . : O n minimal immersions of S in S Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 210, 75-106 (1975) 4. Barcus, W.D., Barratt, M.G. . O n the homotopy classification of the extensions of a fixed map. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 88, 57-74 (1953) 5. Berger, M.: Lectures on geodesies in Riemannian geometry. Lecture Notes No. 33, Bombay: Tata Institute 1965 6. Berstein, I , Edmonds, A.L.: Classification of surface maps modulo self-equivalences. Am. Math. Soc Notices '78T-G42 (1978) 7. Blaschke. W.: Sulla geometria differenziaie delle superftcie S nello spazio euclideo S . Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 28, 205-209 (1949) 8. Brouwer, L . E . J , : Aufzahlung der Abbildungsklassen endlichfach zusammenhangender Flachen. Math. Ann. 82, 280-286 (1921) 9. Calabi, E . : Minimal immersions of surfaces in Euclidean spheres. J. Differential Geometry 1,111¬ 125 (1967] 10. Calabi, E , : Quelques applications de 1'analyse complexe aux surfaces d'aire minima. In: Topics in Complex Manifolds, pp. 59-81 Montreal: University Press 1967 11. Chern, S.S.; Minimal surfaces in an Euclidean space of N dimensions. Diff. and Comb. Top, A symposium in honor of Marston Morse, pp. 187-198. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1965 12. Chern, S.S., Spanier, E . H . : A theorem on orientable surfaces in four-dimensional space. Comm. Math. Helv. 25, 205-209 (1951) 13. Delaunay, G ; Sur la surface de revolution dont la courbure moyenne est constante. With a note appended by M. Sturm. J. Math. Pures Appl. Ser 1, 309-320 (1841) 14. Edmonds, A . L . : Deformations of maps to branched coverings in dimension two. Ann. of Math. 110, 113-125 (1979) 15. Eells, J., Sampson, J.H.: Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds. Am. J . Math. 86, 109-160 (1964) 16. Eells, J., Lemaire, L . : A report on harmonic maps. Bull. London Math. Soc. 10, 1-68, (1978) 17. Eells, J., Wood, J.C.: Restrictions on harmonic maps of surfaces. Topology 15, 263-266 (1976) 18. Frankel, T.: On the fundamental group of a compact minimal submanifold. Ann. of Math. 83,68-73 (1966) 19. Gulliver, R.D., Osserman, R., Royden, H . L . : A theory of branched immersions of surfaces. Am. J. Math. 95 750-812(1973) 20. Heins, M.: Interior mapping of an orientable surface into S . Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2,951-952 (1951) 21. Hopf, H.: Beitragezur Klassifizierung der Flachen abbil dun gen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 165,225-236 (1931) 22 Kenmotsu. K - On minimal immersions of S into S". J . Math. Soc. Japan 28, 182-191 (1976) 23. Kenmotsu, K . : Weierstrass formula for surfaces of prescribed mean curvature. Math. Ann. 245. 89¬ 99 (1979) 24. Kobayashi, S., Nomizu, K . : Foundations of differential geometry. I. I i . New York: tnterscience 1963, 1969 2
2m
2
1
2
4
117 52
25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44.
J. Eells and L . Lemaire
Lawson, H.B.: Complete minimal surfaces in S?. Ann. of Math. 92. 335-374 (1970) Lemaire. L . : Applications harmoniques de surfaces. C.R. Acad, Sci. Paris A280, 897-899 (1975) Lemaire, L . : On the existence of harmonic maps. Thesis, Warwick University 1977 Lemaire, L . : Applications harmoniques de surfaces riemanniennes. J. Differential Geometry 13, 51-78 (1978) Lemaire, L . : Harmonic nonholomorphic maps from a surface to a sphere. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 71, 299-304 (1978) Ludden, G.D., Okumura, M., Yano, K . : A totally real surface in CP that is not totally geodesic. Proc, Am. Math. Soc. 53. 186-190 (1975) Morrey, C.B.: The problem of Plateau on a Riemannian manifold. Ann. of Math. 49, 807-851 (1948) Morrey, C.B.: Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations. Grundlehren Band 130. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1966 Olum. P.: On mappings into spaces in which homotopy groups vanish. Ann. or Math. 57, 561-574 (1953) Olum, P.: Mappings of manifolds and the notion of degree, Ann. of Math. 58, 458^180 (1953) Olum, P.: Cocycle formulas for homotopy classification; maps into projective and lens spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 103, 30-44 (1962) Ruh, E.A., Vilms, 3.: The tension field of the Gauss map. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 149,569-573 (1970) Sacks, J., Uhlenbeck, K . : The existence of minimal immersions of the two-sphere. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 83, 1033-1036 (1977) Sampson, J.H.: Some properties and applications of harmonic mappings. Ann. Ecole Norm. Sup. XI, 211-228(1978) Schoen, R., Yau, S.T.: Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three manifolds with non-negative scalar curvature. Ann. of Math. 110. 127-142 (1979) Smith, R.T.: Harmonic mappings of spheres. Thesis, Warwick University 1972 Tomi, F . : Eineinfacher Beweiseines Regularitatssatzes fur schwache Losungen gewisser elliptlscher Systeme. Math. Z. 112, 214-21B (1969) Wood, J . C . : Singularities of harmonic maps and applications of the Gauss-Bonnet formula. Am. J. Math. 99. 1329-1344 (1977) Wood, J.C.: Holomorptncity of certain harmonic maps from a surface to complex projective nspace. J. London Math. Soc. 20, 137-142 (1979) Eells, J . : On the surfaces of Delaunay and their Gauss maps. IV. Coloq. Inter, Geom. Dif.(in honour of E , Vidal), Santiago de Compostella, pp. 97-116(1979)
Received April 15, 1980
2
118
Proc. Indian A c i d . Sci. (Math. Sci.), Vol. 90, Number i , February 1981, pp. 33-45. ©
Printed in India.
Deformations of metrics and associated harmonic maps By J E E L L S and L L E M A I R E
1, Introduction In this paper wo establish a theorem ((3.1) below) concerning the dependence of harmonic maps on the Riemannian metrics used to define them. Our method is an application of tbe implicit function theorem in suitable manifolds of maps, In the case of a compact range of negative curvature, that result was obtained by Sampson [24], using derivative estimates for harmonic maps given in [10], Another special case has been found by Schoen-Yau [26], and applied by them to obtain theorem (6.3) below. Their proof is entirely different; it is based on a Dirichlet growth theorem of Morrey ([21] lemma 9.4.18) and thus is restricted to maps with two-dimensional domains. In some cases the geometry of the problem introduces irrelevant degeneracy. For instance, that can happen if M or JV" has a nontrivial group of isometries— or if the harmonic map under consideration factorises through a geodesic. More technical results concerning some of these cases are given in § 5. As applications, we offer proofs of two theorems on harmonic diffcomorphisms of surfaces, due to Sampson [24] and Schoen-Yau [26]. We are much indebted to Professor Sampson for many stimulating conversations, as well as for making available to us (many years ago) a preliminary version of his manuscript [24]— a primary source of motivation for the present work.
2.
Basic properties
(2.1) L e i M and TV be smooth (i.e. C") finite dimensional manifolds, with M compact. Unless otherwise specified, we suppose M and N without boundary. We denote by T(M) and T* (Af) the tangent and cotangent vector bundles of M. We are primarily interested in smooth Riemannian metrics on M and N and their associated smooth harmonic maps. However, our main tool is the implicit During the preparation of this paper the authors enjoyed the hospitality of the Institut des Bautes Etudes Scientifiques. The first-named thanks the Universite de Paris V I , where he was Professeur d'Echange. The second-named is Charge de recherches au FoDds National Beige de fa Recherche Scicntifique.
33 P. ( A ) - 3
119 34
J Eells and L Lemaire
function theorem, which in its simplest form applies to maps between Banach spaces. Therefore, at times we shall restrict ourselves to finite orders of differentiability. Furthermore, we need to solve certain linear elliptic equations, and we choose to do so in Schauder's context; see for instance [12]. Therefore, for r an integer such that 2 ^ r <, oo and 0 < a < 1, we shall consider the space C ° (Af, /V) of maps whose differentials of orders <, r satisly an -H61der condition. With the associated topology, C (Af, N) is a smooth manifold modelled on a Banach space, provided r < co. Let lVr • and N " be the spaces of C'-^-Riemannian metrics on M and N. These are open subseU of the Frechet spaces C ( O T* (M)) and C * ( O T* (A/)). If r < DO, M « is an open subset of a Banach space, since M is compact. +
Q
+
+
a
r +
+
+
8
a
2
r+
+,+
, + , +
(2.2) Given (g,A) e M ' » x N « and a C'+^-map tp: M -» N(sometimes written tp : (A/, g) -# (N, ft)), its energy is denned by £ ( p ) = £ ( > ; g , A ) = i J \d
Then
E :C
+ 3 + a
( A / , TV) - * ( > 0) is a C'+^Munction.
(2.3) The extremals of E are called harmonic maps, and satisfy the Euler-Lagrange equation [10] Tp - 0; i.e.
V , £(¥>)= -
S (r
= 0
r + S +
+ a
for all variations v e T ( C * (A/, TV)) of y . T is an element of ( C ' (Af, N)) called the tension field of p. At times we shall have to specify the metrics used and write T ^ = T iff 8> ft)- 1° I l coordinate systems {x } and {«°} on Af and Af, is represented by v
9
Q c a
1
where * T and T are the Christoffel symbols of g and ft. Given a harmonic map p : M -*. N, the second variation of its energy is described by the Hessian y*E(tp), characterised by the identity [20], [29] V * £ ( p ) (u, * ) = / < JfV(x% • where —
is the ./at-ofti operator along
w(x))dx, represented in the notations of ([9], §3
by - J (v) = Trace 9
v + Trace R" {df, v) dp,
where Rf is tbe curvature tensor of (N, ft), /p is a linear elliptic operator. Integration by parts, using the symmetry properties of R", shows that ; {JyV, w) dx= that Jq> is self-adjoint.
J {v J w)dx; t
9
i.e.,
120
Deformations of metrics and harmonic maps
35
2
The condition that S? E(p) is non-degenerate is that K e r / ^ ^ O (or equivalently Ker Jy = 0). The first equality implies that tp is an isolated critical point of E and the second that +e
+
J
T:C
r + a + a
1+
(M, N) X M'+ » X N ' +
t + l +
° -» T(C'
4a
(M, N)).
We work in a neighbourhood of a C'-harmonic map ip„ : (M, g ) -»(N, A ) where g and h are C, but in order to remain in the context of Banach spaces, we take r < co and restrict attention to an exponential chart U of C (Af, N) centred at p and such that the image of every map in the chart is contained in a fixed compact domain K of N. By the canonical identification through exp^ (using the metric ft ), we have 0
a
0
B
r + a - i o
a
0
T(C'+« {M, AO) |
u
= U x r
f t
( C ' « (A/, Af)).
We can represent r by its composition with the projection on the second factor, which we still denote by t : r+1
f
+1+
(2.5) * : U x M + ° X N'- * " -+ T
(C
n
+ a
(M, AO).
T is now a C*-map from an open set of a Banach space to a Banach space. (2.6) Lemma. Consider a smooth path {, i
v
fe&fti
*
M
'
+ w
r +
* x N *
starling at the given C*-triple (y> ;g ,h ) 0
0
0
+ 1 + 0
U
and put
X
~Js-
Ds
i
and
Z= " *
ivAere T, and T, are the Christoffel symbols associated to g, and A,. (Y depends on X, and is given by n,= //
| g*» ( 7 .
+ V , X» ~ 7 , *«,)).
p : (A/, g ) -*• (N, h„) a
(2.7)
is harmonic, then
0
d-r I ^
Trace, (y
s
= dr dpi; g , A ) ( r , * , Z) == Aw + Trace R" (d
0
a
pi) - Trace (Ydtp ) + Trace Z C# a
M
d^ ). a
The terms depending on « are derived in [29], and the others in [19].
121 36
/ Eells and L Lemaire
3.
The main dependence theorem
(3.1) Theorem : Suppose that p : (A/, g„) - • (TV, h ) is a C-harmonic map between C"-Riemannian manifolds such that S7'E(p ) is non-degenerate. Then for 1 < k < oo and r < oo there is a neighbourhood V of (g , A ) in M'" * *" X N +*+ + and a unique C-map S : V -* C (A/, TV) such that S (g„, A ) = j>, S (g, A) is a harmonic map tp ! (A/, g) -* (TV, ft). From (2.7) we note that the hypothesis on the Hessian is satisfied if the sectional curvature Riem" is strictly negative and p (A/) is not a point or a geodesic. 0
a
t
1
0
r
I
a
1
0
+ B + a
0
0
(3-2) Corollary: Lethal and r < oo. Consider a C-path (g„ A,)„ , of C-.mlrics in M'* " x N ' * and suppose that for each sel there is a unique harmonic map tp, : (Af, g ) -» (JV, A,) i« a fixed homotopy class, with each y' E(tp,) non-degenerate. Then the map I - J - C" " * (A/, AO given Aj> s -*
1+
+
w + a
1
(
1
2
0
r
(3.3)
s
Remark : In particular, the conclusion of (3.2) is valid if
(a) each ft, has negative sectional curvature; (b) each (TV,ft.)satisfies the growth conditions described in ([9]; (5-2'a))— always satisfied if TV is compact; (c) the homotopy class contains neither constant maps nor maps to closed geodesies. Application : Such continuous dependence in dimension 2 has been used by Earle-Eells (6) to construct a specific continuous section of the fibre bundle of complex structures over the Teichmiiller space of a closed surface. Proof of theorem (3.1). Consider the map T defined as in (2-5). From (2.7) and the non-degeneracy of v E(
w
e
+ i +
0
r + 2 + a
0
Q
t
4
U
(3.4) Remark. Real analytic ( = C ) harmonic maps have properties not generally shared by other C'-maps [32]. Let Af and TV be C"-manifoIds. It is known ([31], [23]) that the C-metrtcs are dense in M * x N". Furthermore, if tp : (A/, g) -* (TV, A) is a harmonic map between C -Riemannian manifolds, then tp e C°. Theorem (3-1) shows that any C™-harmonic map f between C -manifolds w
u
122
Deformations of metrics and harmonic maps
37
with C°°-Riemannian metrics for which y * £ ( p ) is non-degenerate can be Capproximated by C-maps which are harmonic with respect to suitable metrics.
4.
Dependence for the Dirichlet problem
(4.1) Suppose now that M has a boundary I M and consider the Dirichlet problem (4.2) if
=0 tp
|
=y>
DM
for a fixed map i c e E " (DM, TV), tbf space or restrictions to DM of maps in C - (M, TV). We denote by C$ (U, TV) the Banach manifold of maps tp . M -* N coinciding with \p on DM, r < oo. Its tangent bundle A
T(Cf(M,N))
={veT(C'+*(M,N))
!« \ba = 0 and
nov\ =y,}, QB
where JT : T'TV) -* TV is the canonical bundle projection. The Jacobi operator dip is now a map 2+a
Ttp (C$
(A/, TV)) -» T
For
v,weT
integration by parts as in § 2 shows that J" {Jq> v, w,dx = / (v, Jf w) dx, M H and the non-degeneracy of V E(f) means again that ftp is an isomorphism. 2
(4.3) With these modifications in the proofs, theorem (3.1) and corollary (3.2) remain valid when the harmonic maps are solutions of the Dirichlet problem (4-2), replacing C ' ^ ( M , N )
hI+
by C5 °(A/,7V).
Furthermore, remark (3-3) remains valid for the Dirichlet problem without conditions (6) and (c). Indeed, the existence and unicity of the solution to that problem are guaranteed simply by the curvature assumption (a) ([25]; the unicity follows also from [15]). (4-4) In [13] Goldstein establishes the smooth dependence cn tp of the solution of (4-2) in a neighbourhood of a hannonic map, under the hypothesis that Riem <, 0. His method uses the inverse function theorem and applies to ihe case of a harmonic map with non-degenerate Hessian (without hypothesis on the curvature). Adapting his proof, we see that in a neighbourhood in C ' " (M, AO of a map ¥»„ with V E ( f ) non-degenerate, the map
w
+ w
!
t
A : M'
+ 1 + a
r+i+:<
M
x N'+ x
m + a
f^m-m
+ 2
x C + ° (M, AO -* x
rp„ C '
+ a
r
S
(AT, TV X E -+ +»(S Af.JV)
defined by A (g, h, ) «= (g, h, proj. r(tp;g, k), \DM) is a diffeomorphism; here proj. T(f,g, h) denotes the projection defined in (2-4). It follows that if
123 38
/ Eells and L Lemaire
tp (Af, g ) -> (TV, /i ) is a C-solution of (4.2) with boundary data ip such that V £ ( $ » o ) is non-degenerate, then there is a neighbourhood V of (g , h„; y ) in M'+ - X iV+*+ +* X C ° (Af, TV) and a C-map V -* (A/, AO JUCA that S(g ,h ; \j/ ) — a}^; and S(g,h,i//) is a solution of (4.2) for all (g,h;\/j) e V . See ([16]; Thm 10.5.3) for an alternative treatment in tbe case N = R. a
0
0
a
3
0
I(
0
a
0
l
0
r + 2 +
e
a
(4.5) Example. A simple instance of degeneracy of V £ ( p ) is the following. Take Af — / , N = S" (— the Euclidean n-sphere, n > l j a n d ^ u carrying the endpoints of I onto two antipodal points of S" In this case the solutions of (4.2) are geodesic segments f. We observe that tp is not a continuous function of \j> at yf . B
9
(4.6) Problem. When is { f e E (aAf, N) : E : CJ° (Af, AO-* * is non-degenerate at every critical point} residual (i.e., a countable intersection of open dense subsets) in the space of y for which (4.2) has a solution? See ([22], ch. VII) for the case M = /. (4.7) Problem. In the same order of ideas, when is {(g, I I ) G M ° X N " : the function tp -* E(tp;g,h) in non-degenerate} residual? In that problem one may have to discard certain degeneracies, as was done by Abraham in [2]. (4.8) Example : Let tp : M -» N be a harmonic map. A theorem of Visik [30] applied to the operator J«, asserts that there is a number e > 0 such that for any smooth domain A f C Af of volume M' < we have V*#(j> | ifef') non-degenerate. e
5.
Killing degeneracies %
(5.1) Degeneracy of X} E(tp;g,H) is expressed by the presence of non-zero Jacobi fields along
defined by fayr) -*y/o
0
m
a
+2l
M
a
0
0
r
s
Proof. As in (5.2), I(N,h„) acts smoothly on C + +° (Af, A). By the hypothesis of surjectivity, this action is free on the component of
124
Deformations
of metrics and harmonic maps
39
For a chart U centred at f , let V = V/I(N, h ) denote the orbit manifold of /(TV, A ). Because the tension r is invariant under the action of /(TV, A ), it induces a C - m a p a
a
0
0
r
0
r : U X M +'+ -* T-
(Af, N)II(N,
A„))
as in (2.5). Since Ker — I (TV, A ), the partial differential of T at p in the I I direction is an isomorphism. Therefore, there is a neighbourhood V of g in 0
0
tt
+ , 4
M ' ° and a unique C - m a p S :V-*fj such that S(g ) = p and r(S(g%g) = 0 for all g e V. Following S (g) by the action of /(TV, ft ), we obtain the S of the proposition. 0
0
0
(5.4) By way of contrast, we see from (5.2) that I(M,g„) acts continuously but not differentiably on C (Af, A ). Consequently, we are unable to proceed as in (5.3). However, a satisfactory result can be obtained in an important case, found in the classical literature under the heading of Poincare's continuation method (see [22; Cb. IX] and [27; §21]). The case under consideiation is that of a non-trivial closed geodesic represented as a harmonic map p : S -*(N,h). Now the identity component I(S )'=S induces a one-dimensional degeneracy of V B(p), but does not act differentiably on C ° (S , TV). We follow the usual practice in ealling rp non-degenerate if its only Jacobi fields are those of I (S ). Tbe following result is surely known (We express our thanks to W Klingcnberg and D Sullivan for their comments.) j f + 2 + a
7
1
1
J
2
+ 2 +
1
1
(5.5) Proposition. The non-degenerate smoothly on small deformations of h.
closed
geodesies
of
(TV, A)
depend
Indeed, we identify the prime closed geodesies of (TV, A) with the periodic orbits of the geodesic flow on 2" (TV). The non-degenerate closed geodesies correspond then to the periodic orbits whose Poincare maps have no eigenvflue equal to one. One then applies tbe proof of ([27], §21), or of the stability theorem ([3], §24) to obtain the desired conclusion. (5.6) Let p :(A/,g ) "* (TV,A ) be a harmonic map which factorises through the circle S and whose only Jacobi fields are those induced by I (S ). Combining (5.3) and (5.5), we see that the hannonic map will depend smoothly on a sufficiently small smooth deformation of the metrics. The interest of this observation is that, if we exclude the trivial case of constant maps, that kind of degeneracy is the only possible one in the case Riem < 0. In particular, we can delete the condition (c) in remark (3.3). 0
0
0
1
1
w
6.
Harmonic difleomorphisms of surfaces
As an application, we give a new proof of the following result of Sampson [24] and Schoen-Yau [26] (their proofs involve a decomposition formula for the Laplacian of | dtp | : Af R and the maximum principle). 2
125 40
J Eells and L Lemaire
(6.1) Theorem. Let (Af, g) and (TV, A) be closed orientable surfaces of the same genus p^>l. Assume that the sectional curvature Riem" < 0. If tp : Af -* TV is a harmonic map of degree 1, then tp is a diffeomorphism. Proof. Suppose first that p > 2, so that Riem" ^ 0 . Our hypothesis ensures that tp is homotopic to a diffeomorphism tp . Let us consider a smooth path (g,\ , C M " such that g„ = tp*„ h and g = g. The diffeomorphism tp : (Af, g )-» (TV, A) is then harmonic. Since Riem" <, 0 and 0, for all s e I there is a unique harmonic map f, : (Af, g,) -* (TV, A) homotopic to tp„ [10], [15]. By unicity, p is the given diffeomorphism and p = tp. Furthermore, y^fifft) is non-degenerate, so that corollary (3.2) implies that (fp,),ei' continuous deformation of ? to p. Let S = {t : / ( f t ) > 0 for s < t] where / ( » , ) is the Jacobian of tp,. Since a map of degree 1 with positive Jacobian is a diffeomorphism, it suffices to show that S — I. Therefore we remark that Oe S and show that S is open and closed. That S is open follows from the compactness of Af and the continuity of the above deformation. To show that S is closed, we consider a sequence (/,) c S such that ! ( - * * » • Then J(ip )^.0. By Wood's classification of singularities [32], tp must be a branched covering. Since it is of degree 1, it is a diffeomorphism and r„ e S. a
e
t
0
0
0
x
s
a
a
la
lai
The case p = 1 follows from standard methods (see [9], § 7). By passing to the two-sheeted orientable coverings, we get the (6.2) Corollary. Let (M,g) and (TV, A) be non-orientable closed surfaces of the same genus # 2 * 1 . Assume Riem" <, 0. Any harmonic map £ : (Af, g ) - » (TV, A) homotopic to a diffeomorphism is a diffeomorphism. Once in possession of (4.3), we can simplify somewhat the proof of the fallowing result of Schoen-Yau [26] : (6.3) Theorem : Let (Af,g) be a compact surface with boundary and (TV, A) a compact surface with Riem £ 0. Suppose that ip : Af -» TV is a diffeomorphism onto (Af). Assume that y (£iAf) is convex with respect to (f(Af). Then there is a (unique) harmonic map tp : Af -» TV in the component of tp in C$ (Af, TV) such that q> ] H « -*•
l O U
e
i
0
2
s
2
2
7.
Hannonic maps with non-negative Jacobian
We now examine briefly the possibility of extending the results of § 6 to other situations.
126 Deformations of metrics and harmonic maps
41
(7.1) It is unknown whether the curvature restriction in theorems (6.1) and (6.3) is necessary. (7.2) Almost nothing is known about the singularities of harmonic maps between manifolds of dimensions > 2. We note, however, that for n ^ 3, there are metrics g on the n-torus such that any harmonic map
S ( S
(7.3) In view of theorem (6.1), we could ask whether a harmonic map between surfaces which is homotopic to a surjective branched covering is itsell a branched covering. That this is not the case, even if the target has negative curvature, is shown by the (7.4) Example : Let N be a compact orientable surface without boundary. For any Riemannian metric h on N, there exist a Riemann surface M and a harmonic map ip : M-*(N, h) which is homotopic to a surjective branched covering but is not a branched covering. In particular, if N has negative curvature then the harmonic map is unique in its homotopy class, which therefore contains no harmonic branched covering. On the other hand, note that if N is a sphere, certain homotopy classes can contain two harmonic maps, only one of which is a branched covering [18]. We first construct the example in the case where genus AT= £ > 1. Take any Riemann surface P of genus q + 1. We represent P by the polygon afatfpto? • • - fa+ifta+ifSi*7+i with the usual identifications. Its fundamental group ni (P) is then generated by (a„ * , ) ( £ , i with the single relation I & g afifOT -JT* =• L We represent Afsimilarly, using ( c , < / ) i £ £ The homomorphism Jtj (P) -* Tii (AO defined by a, -* c , b ~* d, (1 < ( < q), u -+ 1 and Z>, -* I determines a homotopy class of maps P -* N of degree 1. By [17] that class contains a harmonic map y. l S
+
1
(
(
t
4
(
a
a + 1
+1
Let M be the surface of genus M — 2q + 1 obtained by joining cross-wise two copies of P . Icng a closed curve cutting the handle of P represented by ( a , r> ). M admits a complex structure such that the covering map fi • M -* P is holomorphic. The composition yo/f : M-*N is then harmonic and is not a branched covering. Since its degree is two and it induces an epimorphism on fundamental groups, it is homotopic to a branched covering by a result of Edmonds [7], That is a consequence of a theorem stating (in his terminology) that any map M ~* N is homotopic to a pinch followed by a branched covering. We remark that our map
0+1
127 42
J Eells and L Lemaire
8. Examples The results of §§ 3-5 affirm that a sufficiently small smooth deformation of metrics induces a smooth variation of the associated harmonic maps, provided that tbe curvature of N or the initial harmonic map satisfies some restrictive hypothesis. By means of examples, we shall illustrate now the nature of these restrictions. (8.1) Sampson has shown us the necessity of making some sort of hypothesis by studying the behaviour of a closed geodesic on a flat cylindei, deformed into a conical shape. His example can be made more explicit as follows. Let TV" be a piece of cylindrical surface (a, b) x S equipped in local coordinates (« ,w*)e(
I
1
U
1
M
l2
e
1
1
For any point c e (a, b), the tension of the map tp ; S -* TV defined by tp (x) = c, q> (x) = x is given by T (p) = — if, T*{p) = 0. Therefore, such a m3p is a geodesic iff / ' (c) = 0. I f / ' (c) < 0, the set { ( a \ « ) | W > c] is the concave side of the curve p. Suppose now that / is constant, so that Tv" is a piece of flat cylinder. For any c e (a, b), the map tp : 5* -» N defined above is a geodesic and the vector field along tp defined by v (x) = const., u ( x ) = 0 is a Jacobi field which is not a Killing field of S . Therefore, tp does net satisfy the hypothesis of proposition (5.5). If we now modify the metric on N in such a way that / becomes decreasing, we observe that iV does not carry any non-trivial closed geodesic, so that proposition (5.5) fails. Indeed, the image of any map tp : S -* N is situated on the concave side of the line a' «• minp . By Sampson's maximum principle [24], tp cannot be harmonic. In this example the degeneracy of # is due to the presence of a continuous family of closed geodesies, obtained by varying c in (a, b). That proposition (5.5) can fail also for an isolated geodesic (up to rotation on S ) can be seen by defining the initial metric by a monotone function / such that / ' ( c ) =• 0 = / " (c); for example / = 1 + («' c) . Then the curve u = c is a geodesic, and the vector field along the curve defined by w = const., = 0 is a Jacobi field. For the perturbed metric determined by / = 1 + (a — c ) + e (a — c), e > 0, there is no geodesic in a neighbourhood of a = c, by the maximum principle. In these examples, we have considered only a piece of surface N. Using partitions of unity, we can extend N to form a complete Riemannian surface. When that surface is compact, there is always a closed geodesic homotopic to a given curve; thus the examples show that a smooth deformation of metrics does not determine a continuous variation of harmonic maps, although the existence of such maps is not in question here. For N non-compact, however, an arbitrarily small deformation of metric could make a harmonic map disappear altogether. Indeed, we can deform the flat metric on an infinite cylinder to a metric such t h a t / ' < 0. Then the modified surface does not carry any closed geodesic. 1
1
2
J
1
2
1
1
1
1
a
1
1
1
1
3
1
128 Deformations
of metrics and harmonic maps
43
(8.2) In all the above examples, the hamonic map under consideration is a geodesic, so that the rotation group of S always induces a degeneracy of the Hessian of E . Therefore, these examples pertain to the situation considered in § 5. It is a simple matter to adapt the examples to suppress that Killing degeneracy. Indeed, it suffices in all the constructions to replace the maps S -> (a, b) x S by maps M(a, b) x M denned analogously, where M is a compact manifold with discrete isometry group. In that way, one sees that the hypothesis of nondegeneracy of the Hessian in theorem (3.1) is essential. 1
1
1
(8.3) In relation to deformations of the metric of M, we have tbe following partial result. Let M be the fiat torus RjlndZ X RjlnZ equipped with Euclidean coordinates (x, y) and N the piece of surface defined as above with u e (— b, b) and / = (b + A) — (u ) (where A > 0). It was observed in [18] that a map f : M ~* N of tbe form p (x, y) — {y/ (x), y) is harmonic iff yi satisfies the pendulum equation 1
1
1
2
For rf = 1, the " length " of the torus coincides with the period of the pendulum and there is a continuous family of harmonic maps. For d jt 1, the only harmonic map of the prescribed form is given by yi = 0, so that we do not have a smcoth variation of the harmonic maps in this restricted class. (8.4) It might be tempting to try to prove existence theorems for harmonic maps, by deforming a metric for which existence is known to another one. The following examples show that this cannot always work : (8.5) Let M be a closed orientable surface of genus 3 and (N, h) a 2-sphere. It is shown in [11] that there is a harmonic map p : (M,g) -> (N, Ii) of degree 3 iff g is a Hermitian metric associated to a non-hyperelliptic complex structure on M. Call E the set of such metrics. Now E is open in M ; although V E (p) is degenerate, we see that for any g e E , a small deformation of g will preserve the existence of a harmonic map. Along a path leadir.g from E to M \ E , however, existence will not be preserved. With respect to this observation, we stress that theorem (3.1) concerns only small variations of metrics, and leads to the global statemert of corollary (3.2) only if existence and unicity of the harmonic maps are assumed. 3
A similar disappearance occurs with respect to variations of Dirichlet data; see ([9], 12.6). (8.6) Let N be the infinite cylinder on which we define a metric h as above, using the function f— e~* + e(u') - The curvature of (N,h ) is negative for all e and a negative constant when t = 0. For any c > 0, (N, h ) carries the closed geodesic u = c, where c is the solution of tr-" = 2ec. For « = 0, the maximum principle implies thtt (N,h„) carries no closed geodesic. Note that (N,h„) does not satisfy the growth condition of remark (3.3). e
2
c
e
1
129 44
/ Eells and L Lemaire
(8.7) Finally, we recall [28] that if f i ^ 3 , A / = S " is the Euclidean sphere and N is an ellipsoid of revolution of dimension n, one of whose axis is A times the others, then there is a harmonic map tp : M -* N which is a suspension of the identity on S"- if A is small, but not if A is large. What happens along a deformation of the metric of N leading from one value of A to the other is not known. 1
References [IJ [2] [3] [4]
Abraham Abraham Abraham Calabi E
[5] (6]
(Papers in honour of K Kodaira) (Princeton : University Press and 1969 University of Tokyo Press) 101-117 Dieudonne J A 1960 Foundations of modem analysis (New York : Academic Press) Earle C 3 and Eells J 1969 A fibre bundle description of Teichmiiiler theory; / . Diff.
[7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] 114] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]
R 1962 Lectures of Smale on differential topology. Columbia University R 1970 Bumpy metrics; Proc. Symp. Pure. Math. 14 1-3 R aad Robbin J 1967 Transversal mappings and flows (New York : Benjamin) 1969 A n intrinsic characterisation of harmonic one-forms; Global Analysis
Geom. 3 19^t3 Edmonds A L 1980 Deformations of maps to branched coverings in dimension two (to appear) Eells J 1966 A setting for global analysis; Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 71 751-S07 Eells J and Lemaire L 1978 A report on harmonic maps; Bull. London Math. Soc. 10 1-68 Eells J and Sampson J H 1964 Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds; Am. J. Math. 86 109-160 Eelis J and Wood J C 1976 Restrictions on harmonic maps of surfaces; Topology IS 263-266 Gilbarg D and Trudinger N S 1977 Elliptic partial differential equations of second order (Grundlehxen 224 : Springer Verlag) Goldstein R A 1972 Stability of the boundary value problem for harmonic mappings; /. Math. Anal. Appl. 39 346-359 Hamilton R S 1975 Harmonic maps of manifolds with boundary. Springer lecture notes 471 Hartman P 1967 On homotopic harmonic maps; Can. J. Math. 19 673-6S7 Hormander L 1964 Linear partial differential operators (Grundlehren : Springer Verlag) Lemaire L 1975 Applications harmoniques de surfaces; CR Acad. Sci. Paris A280 897-899 Lemaire L 1978 Harmonic nonholomorphic maps from a surface to a sphere; Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 71 299-304 Lichnerowkz A 1961 Propagateurs et commutateurs en relativite generale; IHES Publ. 10 Mazet E 1973 L a formule de l a variation seconde de i'energie au voisinage d'une application hannonique; J. Diff. Geom. 8 279-296 Morrey C B 1966 Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations. (Grundlehren : Springer Verlag) Morse M 1934 The calculus of variations in the large; Am. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 18 Royden H L 1960 The analytic approximation of difTerentiable mappings; Math. Ann. 139 171-179 Sampson J H 1978 Some properties and applications of harmonic mappings; Ann. Ec. Norm. Sup. 11 221-228 Schoen R M 1977 Existence and regularity of some s °metric variational problems; Thesis, Stanford Univ. Schoen R M and Y a u S T 1978 On univalent harmonic maps between surfaces; Invent. Math. 44 265-278 Siegel C L and Moser J K 1971 Lectures on classical mechanics (Grundlehren : Springer Verlag) e
130
Deformations of metrics and harmonic maps
45
(28] 129]
Smith R T 1975 Harmonic mappings of spheres; Am. J. Math. 97 364-385 Smith R T 1975 The second variation formula for hannonic mappings; Proc. Am. Soc. 47 229-236
[30J
Visik M I 1951 On strongly elliptic systems of differential equations; Math. Sbornik 29 615-676 Whitney H 1934 Analytic extension of differentiable functions defined on closed sets; Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 36 63-89 Wood J C 1977 Singularities of harmonic maps and applications of the Gauss-Bonne formula; Am. J. Math. 99 1329-1344
[31] [32]
J . Eells Department of Mathematics University of Warwick Coventry C V 4 7 A L ( U K )
Math.
L . Lemaire Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques 35 Rue de Chartres 91440 Bures-sur-Yvette, France Also Universite Libre de Bruxells (Belgium)
131 A CONSERVATTOH LA» FOE HARMONIC MAPS P. Baird and J . E e l l s
I . Motivation and back-ground.
(1.1)
R e l a t i v i t y theory has shown that the lavs of many s t a t i o n a r y aspects of
physics should be enlarged to include time. That can be done i n such a manner to provide u n i f i c a t i o n of various p h y s i c a l concepts, and to present them i n i n v a r i a n t form ; see
[ 1 9 , 5 3 . 2 ] and [33] . For instance,
a) energy and momentum are u n i f i e d by forming the energy-moment urn tensor ; b) then the conservation of energy i s j u s t the time-component of a lav which i s i n v a r i a n t under the Lorentz group - the other components being the
space-components,
which express the conservation of momentum. The ease of s t a t i o n a r y electromagnetic f i e l d s i s c a r r i e d out i n [40;pp75, 166]. We d e s c r i b e here b r i e f l y the case of s t r e s s - e n e r g y , following the exposition of Feynman [14,11-31-9]
.
The s t r e s s at .. point of an e l a s t i c body is described by a 2-tensor ( S J J ) in
Ttt^ , where
S. .
i s the i-component of .-. force associated to the j - v e c t o r i n the
following way. Consider a u n i t area of
S
S
orthogonal to
j
at
a . The m a t e r i a l on the
e x e r t s a force on the m a t e r i a l on the r i g h t and v i c e versa
are equal and opposite,
and we suppose depend only on the
of t h i s p a i r of f o r c e s , we obtain the s t r e s s i - v e c t o r . He assume that
S. .
S..
at
x
that the system be i n e q u i l i b r i u m implies that
S^.
as the rate of flow of the
corresponding to the
Vol. 894, pp. 1 25 (1981). 0 1 9 8 1 Springer-Verlag Berlin-Heidelberg.
S^^
be symmetric, and
so we could as w e l l
i-comconent of momentum through a u n i t
Reprinted with permission from Lecture Notes in Mathematics, T
j - v e c t o r . By choosing one
be divergence f r e e .
Now a force i s a time-rate of change of momentum , S .
these forces
behaves l i k e a tensor. Then one can show that the
law of conservation of momentum about some o r i g i n implies
describe
left
132 2
area orthogonal to
j . Thus
B
(8..) 1 3
are tbe P li
i,j
a c e
components of a 2-tensor
1.3
in four dimensional Minkowski space with components ( S . , ) nents f
i
e
X
are those of energy flow, and S d
f ..)
s
o
is the energy density. The tensor
ia traditionally called the stress-energy tensor
S
1 J
q
j thus the C-compo-
OSi.j s 3
of t h e s y s t e m . In intrinsic terms, we shall interpret a symmetric 2-covariant tensor field
S as a stress-energy tensor, as follows : for any timelike vector
v at a
point, we interpret a) S(v,v) as the energy density as measured by v ; b) S ( v , - )
as the momentum density {of the mass/energy distribution) as
measured by v ; c) S| ^ as the stress tensor as measured by V .
(1.2)
I f the field equations of the physical system are derivable from a varia
tional principle (1.3)
J"l,Cj 9)d* ,
I(s)
k
then by restricting attention to special variations we proceed to define the stressenergy tensor (1.4)
div
S ; at an extremal
s
of
I
i t can be shown that
S is conservative i
S- 0 .
That result is due to Hilbert [20] ; for an exposition, see [19,S3.3] . (1.5)
During a most instructive conversation many years ago (in April 1963), Profes-
sor A. H. Taub suggested that the stress-energy tensor should be useful in the theory of harmonic maps. Although that prospect has lain dormant in the meantime, recent developments have confirmed Taub's prediction. Indeed, if
$
:
(M,g) * (N,h)
is a map between Riemannian manifolds (here
and henceforth we shall use the notation and terminology of [10]), then its energy density
e
: H-»1H(>0)
is defined at each point
x £M by
133
0.6)
e <X) - | |d* < ) | 4
X
2
,
where the vertical bars denote the Eilbert-Schmidt norm in the space
For any compact domain M' in K we define the energy of (1.7)
E(*,M'>
j
1
by
,e {x)dx . 4
The Euler-Lagrange operator associated with of
+ in K
L(T (M),T,, (N)). x *(x)
E is called the tension field
t
(1.8)
Tj = div dt
where div
,
is the divergence operator of the Riemannian vector bundle
T*(M) a $ T(N),
And the stress energy tensor of * is found to be 0-9)
S
+
* «
t
g -••h .
A map t : (H,e) + (N,h)
is harmonic i f
t.=0 t
on
M . Such a map then
satisfies the conservation law (1.10) Here
div div
S, S 0 S,
is alternative notation for
covariant differential
?*S. , where V* is the adjoint of the
2
v : C(T*(M) • o T*(H)) -* C(T*(M)) .
The purpose of this paper is to derive that simple law (Theorem 2.9 below), and to show how i t unifies and simplifies various properties (both old and new) of harmonic maps.
134
2. Derivation of the stress-energy Censor.
Let us f i r s t consider tbe effect of v a r i a t i o n s induced by a vector X £ C(T(M)) . I f
( £ { t ) > denotes i t s t r a j e c t o r i e s , set
field
g
He derive two standard f a c t s .
( 2
.,)
3
j ^ . .
d
e
t
KW
t
Proof.
(2.2,
Trace (i^g) det g .
0
F i r s t of a l l , i n charts we have
U*&>
3t
H det | ( t )
t => 0
•Trace | | det
g(t)
t =0
Let
m - dim H . I f we take an orthomormal base (e.) with respect m * liiSn g =• g(o) on TjjtM) , l e t n 6 ft be the m-covector dual to B^A A e^ , 1
to so
n(e, L
e ) • 1 . Then m
det g ( t ) *
n(g(t)e ,...,g(t)e )
Then using
(2.1)
d dt
det
l
a
,
with
g(o) = I .
"<«<"•
g(t) t • 0
t - 0
thus (2.2) follows at once.
Secondly, by d e f i n i t i o n ,
the L i e d e r i v a t i v e S%g-8
at so
>W \ «<»•.'
lini
(2.1) follows from ( 2 . 2 ) .
135
(2.3) g(t)
Lemma. , then
«.4)
If
ri (c)
r, ( t ) -
-[det
5*(t)„
g(tY]
1 / 2
m
d x ' A . • - A ax
i s the volume element of
;
J a M
|
-
Proof.
At
1
Trace
8
- 1/2
( t ) ] ^
' ^ g t t )
n
te
1
Trace (L^g) [ d e t g(t)]
Now, for any vector f i e l d
(2.5)
l | M
t • 0 ,
• | ^ - i [ d e t
tion of
e
f given by
/
l
2
di
X€C(T(M))
1
A . . . A di" .
let
]L X e C ( * ' T ( N )
( s ) X{x) , for a l l x £M .
Lemma. L eo- s
< d * . V (*_X)>- 1/2 < L g , * * h > x
Proof.
L e = x
.
W e ) ( X ) -
t
+
2
t
A d i r e c t c a l c u l a t i o n gives ( 2 . 5 ) , using the standard i d e n t i t y
(2.6)
(2.7) have
(L.g) ^ ij
-
X. . l
Lemma. L
(2.8)
be that v a r i a -
,
+
J
X. . J
For any map
>
.
ft*£,j
S
*
e g -
» : (K,g) -* (N,b) <
t
8
Y '%
>
and vector f i e l d n
• "
h
e
r
X £ C ( T ( « ) ) we
e
2
t*h e C ( 0 T * ( H ) ) .
4
i s the s t r e s s - e n e r g y
Proof.
i m) .
1
(e^n ) -
x
( i n any c h a r t )
tensor of 4 .
Apply (2.5) and ( 2 . 4 )
He s h a l l denote the divergence of
S
to
by d i v
S
or by
7*S
. In a chart.
136
(div 5 ) - (S ) 9 * i il.i (2.9>
. Thus div
S £C(T*M).
Z
Theorem. The s Ires synergy censor
£ C(e T*(M)> of any map i : (M,g)+ffi, h)
has divergence (2.10)
div
S, - -
Consequently. a) — if i .is harmonic, then .. — .
S. $ is conservative (i.e,div S tSO)
b) i f $ i s a map which is a differentiable submersion almost everywhere on M> and i f
div
= 0 , then $ i s harmonic.
Proof.
From (2.6) we obtain
Applying the divergence theorem and integration by parts to ( 2 . 7 ) , assuming that
X has compact support we obtain
0-[ J
I- (e n) H
X
JM
*
Because that is true for a l l compact
*
( + v*S )Xn . *
J K *
X , we find (2.10) satisfied ; the rest of
the Proposition follows immediately. (2.11) Kemarlc.
In case
b)
i t suffices to assume that * is
c'-diffeomorphism between compact surfaces, then
div
I,E 0
2
C . If # is a insures that 6
is
harmonic [ 3 4 , Chapter 5 ] . In view of the basic regularity theorem [10,43.5] , i t seems natural to pose the 2
(2.12) Problem.
If t is a continuous
I^-map satisfying the hypotheses of
b)
above, then i s 4 harmonic ? (2.13) Corollary.
Let
X be a Killing field of
(M,g), and
S*
the contravariant
representation of the stress-energy tensor of a harmonic map $ : (M, g) •* (N,h) . Then the contraction
Y - <S
,X > is a vector field with
div 1 = 0.
In particular, the total flux over the boundary of any closed domain *
M
in
H of the
X-component of
S" i s 0
:
137
dx'J
atProof.
we get
divYdx - 0 , where » ia the unit outward normal field of
3M' .
) M' Killing fields
X are characterised by
L g = 0 . Thus from ( 2 . 5 ) x
div Y -
(2.14) There are various instances where stress-energy appears in the variational theory of Riemannian fibre bundles. For example, a) in the derivation of extremal Riemannian metrics ; that is in the s p i r i t of Hilbert'a work [20]; see [25] and [ 2 8 ] . b) in the study of the extremals of the elastic-energy functional (for fixed
X,u€E)
as given in [35] . c) in the theory of functionals of the elementary symmetric functions of the eigenvalues of \W
-
**h with respect to
g
o^
[41] . I f
a (g"'**h) dx, l£
then its Euler-Lagrange equation is Trace
vW+.T^, ( g ~ ' A ) 1 - 0 ;
and its stress-energy tensor S (t) - { o (g"'A)g k
where
k
•*h*T _ {E A) , - l
k
1
is the Newton tensor field [29,30,41] . d) in recent work of Toth [36] , using the stress-energy tensor to study
geodesic variations o£ harmonic maps into locally symmetric Riemmanian manifolds.
138
3. Various i l l u s t r a t i o n s ,
( 3 . 0 Example.
If
dim M -
(3.2) Example.
If
N = E , then
(3.3) Example.
Suppose that $ : ( n , g ) - t ( N , h )
iff
m- 2
such that and
and
I , then
S^ = -
|
u
g ) . Indeed, i f
0 • Trace S • (m-2)e , so f f
and
1 2 S = & d*I g - (U • • *
div
- -<
and
div S
.
*
» -
i s a nonconstant map. Then
$ i s weakly conformal ( i . e .
**h
2
S
=0
there i s a function p : M . » ] R ( a ) £
S
= 0 then * i s weakly conformal with u • e ; t * m = 2 . Conversely, i f **h - ug, then 2e • mu , •
BO
(3.4)
s
r
^
u
Furthermore, i f then
.
s
m>2
and
$: (M, g)
(N ,h)
i s harmonic and weakly conformal,
$ i s homothetic ( i . e . p i s constant). For Theorem 2 . 9 . a s s e r t s that div S : 0 ,
'
v
and from (3.4) (3.5) Remark.
we find
0 « —— p,^ g _
Ue f i r s t learned
of
(I < i < m) , whence
dp = 0
on
H .
that property i n a l e t t e r from Professor
J . H . Sampson i n 1975. Special cases can be found i n the l i t e r a t u r e ; e . g . ,
if m • n
see [15, Theorem 8b] and [23, Theorem 5.7] . And [21] for the general case with the requirement that p has isolated zeros.
(3.6) Example. then
A
If
$ : (M, g) * (N,h)
i s a t o t a l l y geodesic map ( i . e . ,
i s p a r a l l e l . Consequently,
e^
i s constant and
is parallel :
VS. = 0 . Proof.
For any
(3.7)
V [(A)(T,Z)] -
(3.6)
V [(dt)Y] x
because $ (3.9)
VJf X
X . T . Z 6 C(T(M))
we have
(V A)(Y,Z) • (A)(V„Y,Z) + (A)(Y,v„Z) ; V
(W*)(X,Y) * (d ){7 Y) T
x
(dtXvjY) ,
i s t o t a l l y geodesic. Now s p e c i a l i z e =
0
X , Y , Z so that
= V.
at a prescribed point
x 6 » . Then from
(3.7) evaluated at
S 0) ,
x
we obtain
139
(v i)*h)(Y,Z) -
7
x
X
J;
) . He conclude Chat
No«
2e
-
v(**h)
0
* <(d*)Y,v
(
on
x
M,
f ( 2 » ) - V
0
too.
(3.10) Example.
If
»: ( H , g ) ( N , h )
i s an isometric
immersion, then
S
• 4>
g , Z
whence
whether or not $
(3.11) L e t
i s hannonic
i; (M,g) • (N,h)
(i.e.,
i s a minimal immersion).
be a Riemannian submersion. Then
S_ - " g - t*h ;
and a)
5
s
* ^
"
i f f the f i b r e s of
[38, Prop. 4D] . Such a
$ are minimal ;
that
reaffirms
t i s an example of a harmonic morphism, of which more w i l l
be said i n ' 5 below. b)
VS
damental form
0 Vd*
of * vanishes on pairs of v e r t i c a l vectors-
Proof b ) , the Proof a) being s i m i l a r . 1 £ i,b,L £ m ,
i * i,j
£ n ,
Use
Then (V S . ) ( X ,X ) \ *
indices
(X^)
with
(X^)
horizontal and
(**h>(«„ X ,X > • (•*h)(X ,v x ) . Taking *b S
a
(X^) v e r t i c a L
a - r
and e
i
C
gives {V S ) ( X . , X ) X.
[38 S3] .
n*l £ r , s < m .
Take a l o c a l orthonormal frame f i e l d
c
4 are t o t a l l y geodesic i f f the second fun¬
i f f the fibres of
( t * h ) < X . , V X ) . Thus lX^^r v
VS •
0
implies that the horizon-
(VX^)" s 0 .
Conversely, i f
(VX ) r
H
= 0 , then (V S . H X . . X ) X^ I 1 r
(»*h)(X. v 1
-
\
X ) T
0 . Si¬
m i l a r l y ,
- (t*h)
^ g l X ^ )
• f
^
,
^
)
-
tt(v^s/^)
4
g U . , ^ )
, 0 .
•
In summary, (VX ) r
= 0
implies
?„ S , = 0 X *
for a l l
1 < b < m .
b
To prove the second equivalence
in
b, take
y £ N
and l e t
- 4 '(y),
140 10 and
i
: (F , k | y
y
)*(H,g)
the isometric inclusion map. From the composition law
y
[ 1 1 , ( 4 . 1 ) ] we find
whence for
X, Y 6 C(T(F^)) ,
zontal and t
i s an isomorphism on horizontal vectors,
t
iff
Vdi
a 0 . I.B.J
y
are t o t a l l y
vd*(X,Y) - - * , { 7 d i ^ ) ( X , Y )
Euclidean space
V . Let
the o r i g i n
* : (M, g) + (V, h)
and endow
is the Gauss map of a)
C denote the Grassmannian of
- ,
B, • b)
vd*
-
relationship
dy
b
fc
S
R " g
Y
(K,g) into a V
through : M -* G
L
K* •
itself)
, where
(using the repre-
K-fG i s the vector
with the d i f f e r e n t i a l of •
:
; is
y*k . Then we have the b a s i c i n t e r -
[27] .
y? y k - B?. "i ' j ab ij
If
L E G is
s
Y*k - < B . , * . > - S i c c i
i 12 |T^|
m-planes i n
$ can be i d e n t i f i e d
T(G)
the third fundamental form of j
S
fibres
then
bundle whose f i b r e over
(3.15)
the
G with i t s standard Riemannian metric k . I f y
sentation of the tangent vector bundle
2e
be an isometric immersion of
the second fundamental form B , of t
Tf
the r i g h t member vanishes
geodesic.
Let
(3.14)
y
?d(r vanishes on p a i r s of v e r t i c a l vectors i f f
(3.12) Example.
(3.13)
. Since ( V d i ) ( X , Y ) i s h o r i -
l J
,
A
;
-R.. . aB I J 0
i s the s c a l a r curvature of
H B . Consequently, e
S
the stress-energy
• g - B..T 2
a)
+ Ricci
K
(M»g) then we c a l c u l a t e tensor of y
is
.
t
the immersion has constant mean curvature, then
div S = 0 . That i s an a p p l i c a -
tion of the theorem of Ruh-Vilms c h a r a c t e r i s i n g such immersions v i a harmonicity of t h e i r Gauss maps [31] .
141
L e t us now interpret: that : F i r s t of a l l , E i n s t e i n ' s f i e l d tensor [I9,p..74] Ricci
- — g i s divergence free t
as a consequence of B i a n c h i ' s second i d e n t i t y . Secondly
therefore,
(3.16)
- B°- , T h
since
S. . ,
= < t „ T> g. . - B° • , TAU
" 8° i l , h
A
$ has constant mean c u r v a t u r e . The i n t e r p r e t a t i o n (3.13) gives 53 *
the second fundamental form of the map VS Y
div S Y
of
y , so (3.16) becomes
-
- <
T
Y
T(G)
1,
K*« K ,
, x > 5 0 . *
Remark : For any space form (V,h) of constant curvature e
(3.14) i s Y*k -
,
- Y *
Therefore, with the i n t e r p r e t a t i o n
(3.17)
g Y
, the analogue
[271. <8 , r > * *
(3.18) Remark.
Ricci
6
+ c ( m - i ) g , and ue can proceed with that as above.
Harmonicity of Gauss maps
of a Riemannian f o l i a t i o n
died i n [39] . That should be taken into account i n consideration (5.7)
F is stubelow.
142
12
4. Haps from Kahier manifolds.
(4.1) L e t
(M,g)
be <• Kahier manifold of
dim^M - m . Then the complex s t r u c t u r e
induces a decomposition of i t s complexified tangent bundle e
T (l©
T ' { « ) • T"(H) .
and hence a type decomposition of a l l tensor f i e l d s if
* : (M,g) +(N,h)
tensor has the
H . In p a r t i c u l a r ,
i s a map into a Riemannian manifold, then i t s
stress-energy
decomposition
2
(4.2) S
on
2
- S < ' ° > •. S " ' " •
S
<°> >
and s
(2.0)
(0^)
s
Similarly,
E C ( E
V*
( M ) )
.
the complex extension of the covariant d i f f e r e n t i a l of (H,g) ,
treated as a Riemannian manifold now, decomposes :
(4.3) 7 where
1
7'
7' + 7"
,
: C(T'(M)) x C(«T"H) •>• C ( » T * M )
, and s i m i l a r l y for
7" .
These decompositions provide greater p r e c i s i o n i n the a s s e r t i o n of Theorem 2.9 ; ,9 ; indeed, write out 2
vV
( V * * V"*)( < -°> * < » * » * S
and compare types, s i m i l a r l y for
(4.4) V * S 7<*
S
( 2
0
S
noting that
7'* c a r r i e s
7"* . He conclude that
' '
0 )
0
* 7"* S
( 1
'
l )
2
* 7"* S < ° - >
s
( 0
-
2 )
)
(p,q)-types
7*S, = 0
into ( p - 1 , q ) - t y p e s
; and
iff
0 , and/or = 0 .
Thus we obtain the (4.5)
Proposition.
If
4 : (H g)*(N h) 1
1
into a Riemannian manifold, then equations
i s a harmonic map of a Kahier manifold ( 4 . 4 ) are s a t i s f i e d .
143
13
(4.6)
Example•
Let
M be a Riemann surface and
g
a compatible Hermitian m e t r i c .
He s h a l l w r i t e the components of the stress-energy tensor of <. map i ; H •* (N,h) as follows
: Write
<
,
>
E
for the symmetric
Then i n terms of an isothermal chart on 2 <• , a> — > z z
e . g • p
I
Aziz
and the type decomposition of
(A)
(•*h)''
1
4
- 2 <* , 4 -
>
i
C
V -<* ,*-> 7
( 2
S '°> - - <
M,
,
$*h
is
s
dzd7
E
dz 1
He note that i n t h i s case
(4.7)
, > .
* >• dz ,
2
(
h - <
2
- < v
2 , 0
I - b i l i n e a r extension of
2
1
s' ' ' 5 0
11^* d z
V
2
, and
.
An a p p l i c a t i o n of P r o p o s i t i o n ( 4 . 5 ) produces the well-known properties [ 1 0 , ( 1 0 . 5 ) ] i If
$ : K -*(N,h)
(4.8)
i s a harmonic map, then 2
a)
(4*h) '^
i s a holomorphic quadratic d i f f e r e n t i a l on' M .
b)
(*"h) '° =0
2
Example•
iff
t
i s weakly conformal.
A holomorphic map
•;• : ( M , g ) - » ( N , h ) between Kahier manifolds i s
harmonic [11.S2C] and preserves type. He conclude that
2
(4.9)
S< '°>
, 0
and
0
V"* s f '
* 0 .
M ui denotes the Kahier form of
If
(4. 10) H, t
-
e,»" *
t o"
i s the Kahlerian analogue of We can a l s o w r i t e then
e^
1 0
-
2
Jen ™
- 2
S, . * m > ifl
t& ; for i f
$ i s holomorphic,
< m", 4 iu > . t h i s l a s t by a d i r e c t c a l c u l a t i o n .
2
N
Proposition.
In particular, i f class
fl. = <w t
|d'||
(M,g) then
If
* i s holomorphic, then i! *
M i s compact, then ^,!!)
morphic c h a r t s we have
. Indeed, div s ,
i s co-closed on
M : d*il = 0 4
$ determines the cohomology =0
iff
d*n
0 . For i n s t a n c e , i n holo-
144 14 H
/-I
— Hi from which i t follows that
N—
/-I 2
0,T"
/-I 2
h
T oB S.-r IJ Finally,
d*fl
- - *d*ft , we see that
cohomology c l a s s of
since
*S> i s closed, and therefore determine* a complex
H . We have also
(4.12) C o r o l l a r y .
f IU'VQ.
- (m-l) K(») ,
where 2
2
K{*) - J^(|d'* I ( | d ' j1' - -| d| "d*"| ") | ) dxdx - - IJ^k k dx . t
t
Thus as CQhomQlogy claasea [*")
u
l-n ] -
„ . Proof.
M „ LO A * ii
B U t
M , M,m-1 y, ... •u - ( a ) /(m-1) I
Therefore,
*
-
01 A*» U>
e
-
|d't|
M
-
ui A.n^
» ™
+ |d",|
If
mk —
2
*
k
*
, if t
i s holomorphic.
- k dx - (m-l)k dx .
t
ml $ : (M,g)VKN,h)
t Is a holomorphic and isometric imnersion,
- (m-1) M .
(4.14) Example. then
2
i
and —r - dx , ml
. , n.a )
*
then ft
T
dx
(4.13) Example•
#
M M M . . N I- • u AMU* - til A* U
*
•
lk dxl.
(
K
If
* : ( M , g ) * (N,h) i s a holomorphic Riemannian submersion,
0.* - noi - t'd* , where
Ii - dim.N it .
145 15
5 - Harmonic morjahiams •
(5.1)
A map $ : (M,g) -•• (N,h) 4 '(V)
tion on tant map
whenever
f
i s a harmonic morphism
for any
X - K i-K
^
Ker d$(x)
T
in
S
(K)
denote the modules of conformality
an open dense subset of
0
#
H . If
i s a harmonic funcV c: H . A noncons-
4 i s a harmonic map and i s h o r i z o n t a l l y con-
x e M at which the d i f f e r e n t i a l
to the orthogonal complement of let
f
i s a harmonic function on a domain
$ i s a harmonic morphism i f f
formal ; i . e . ,
if
d$(x)
\0
its
restriction
i s conformal and s u r j e c t i v e ;
; such a map i s a submersion on
x £ H i s a s i n g u l a r point,
then rank.
d$(x) - 0 ;
i s an open map.
The theory of harmonic morphisms of Riemannian manifolds i s due p r i m a r i l y to Fuglede
[15]
. See a l s o
[23] .
We s h a l l use the stress-energy tion of
(5.2)
[3, Theorem 2 . 3 ]
Theorem.
Let
; see a l s o
tensor to e s t a b l i s h the following
generalisa-
[23] :
$ : (H.g) -* (N,h)
be a submersion which i s a harmonic morphism.
Then ( s e t t i n g n • dim H) a)
if
n • 2 , the fibres are minimal submanifolds
b)
i£_
a \ 2 , then the following properties are equivalent :
t i v e l y closed
i)
the fibres are minimal submanifolds
ii)
ye
iii)
the h o r i z o n t a l d i s t r i b u t i o n has mean curvature
iv)
the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c
F i r s t of a l l , we have
Take a point r
X 1 indices :
is a vertical field
;
;
(m-c-)-form
x,
vo
/ 2e
;
of the f o l i a t i o n i s r e l a ¬
[32] .
Proof.
with
j
X n
I ja.bii
- OX 12 , consequently
x e H and an orthonormal frame
h o r i z o n t a l and
;
e
I Si,j s n ;
X ,, n* J
,X m
n'lii.iin .
(X ) , a 1 i « im
S
w
- ~
near
g - $*h .
v
v e r t i c a l . Use the following ranges of
146 16
The map t
(5.3)
i s harmonic, so div
o
V
a
-
0 ,
therefore
)
Since the frame i s orthonormal
(5.4)
o -
J
i
" I where
lAl^.x.)
(5.5)
i
« A(x.,7 _ .)] , J t
X
H denotes horizontal p r o j e c t i o n . Choose
(5.3)
J
^
X. ; then
X (**h(X^.X > a
a
X^(X) , and using (5.4),
equation
becomes X U) + A f
0 -
• ^
v
A
)
+
X..X • A ( X . . v
X )
I
««'I.-'IV J r - ' ^ j - ' X j ( X ) + J, (mean curvature of f i b e r in J
2
Thus we have proved ( a ) , and ( i ) i f f
Now choose
(5.8)
r
A('
direction).
( i i ) in ( b ) .
X. = X , Equation (5.3)
0 =|x (A)
X^
becomes
V V
x
1 - | X U ) - AglHv^ X , X ) i r
r
;
= fx U) , xs^.x.'V r
1
- I X (A) - nX(mean curvature of horizontal d i s t r i b u t i o n i n
We now choose and we obtain ( i i )
X^ iff
X
direction).
to be i n the d i r e c t i o n of the v e r t i c a l p r o j e c t i o n of
(iii)
in (b).
?e
.
147
17
F i n a l l y , l e t us consider twisted c h a r a c t e r i s t i c point
x £ M
T (* ' ( t ( x > ) x for a l l Y
° f the submersion by assigning to each
T
]
X
dx.(jt;x .
(
n+1
X ...... n+J
!
X £ T ($ { * ( x ) ) , Y £ T (M) we have m X
m
Then the equivalence of Example.
x £ H ,
X ,Y) - 0 .
n
t
x (with Riemmannian s t r u c t u r e
( M , g ) ) . Thus i f
the submersion) i f for a l l
(5.4)
x
X ,,...,X i s an orthonormal base 0+1 m , then x,(x;Y , Y ) det< X ,Y > 4' ' n+l m r s x Y^ £ W • Say that X i s r e l a t i v e l y closed (with respect to
of
t
(m-n)-form
[ | , 3 2 l , we define the p o s s i b l y
the volume element of the f i b r e through
induced from that of
Q
( i ) and ( i v ) is merely an a p p l i c a t i o n of
[32, Prop 1] .
There are submersions which are harmonic morphisms, but which do
not s a t i s f y the equivalent conditions of Theorem 5.2b. Here i s an example. For i : IR x K - IK
k - 1 , 2 , 4 , 8 , we r e c a l l the Hopf construction, which produces a map by the formula
2
2
, ( z , w ) • ( | z | - [ w | , 2 zu) , using the norm, m u l t i p l i c a t i o n and conn
jugation of the appropriate r e a l d i v i s i o n algebra. I f Q
in K * ' with c e n t r e
o
and radius
I t i s easy to v e r i f y that
r , then
(5.5)
for any Kahier metrics
due to Van de Ven [36]
: Suppose that
T
of
and there are holomorphic
(5.6)
N a Riemann s u r f a c e . Then . : (M, g ) - . (N, h)
dim^M > 1 ; but here i s an example,
satisfying
Wj A >",
M onto any compact Riemann surface 1-forms
is a
M i s a compact complex surface with two l i -
nearly independent holomorphic [-forms u , , i s a holomorphic map
• ••
E?^ - o , being compact.
g,h on H,H, every holomorphic map
harmonic morphism. Such maps are rather rare i f
j If" x IK' - o-> L-^
(k-^*epheres ; and for
M be a Kahlerian manifold and
Let
2
' ( r ) + S ( r ) ; and o - * '(o),
$ i s a harmonic morphism, and that
they cannot be minimal submanifolds of
Example.
denotes the sphere k
$ ; S
i s a l s o a submersion. However, i t s fibres are a l l k • 2,4,8
S (r)
8 . , 8^
on
0 . Then there
N of genus
N such that * * ( B )
Suppose t h a t i n Theorem 5.2 we have dim M
k
<\
dim N - 1 , and that
S i. 2 ;
CIS k s 2 ) .
Ve^
is ver-
2 t i c a l . Then i t s t r a j e c t o r i e s are geodesies, so
Ve,
i s a function of
h o r i z o n t a l d i s t r i b u t i o n ( i o t e g r a b l e i n t h i s case) has mean curvature »o i t i s a function of
e.
, too. Otherwise s a i d ,
e
e
. The
Ve^ /2e^ ,
: M + E { >0) i s an
148
18
isoparametric function i n the sense of E . Cartan. For l i t e r a t u r e concerning these remarkable functions, see
(5.7)
Remark.
[10,58.5] . And [ 2 ] for further developments and examples.
I t i s reasonable to expect that an analogue of Theorem 5.2
l i d for Riemannian f o l i a t i o n s
F of
M(i.e.,
[24] . The idea would be to i n t e r p r e t dle of
(5.8)
those with b u n d l e - l i k e m e t r i c s ) ; see
f as • harmonic s e c t i o n of the Grassmann bun-
M , and then c a l c u l a t e u i t h i t s stress-energy tensor
Problem.
is va-
S^. .
I t would be i n t e r e s t i n g to know the extent to which Theorem 5.2
i s v a l i d for a r b i t r a r y harmonic morphisms. In the case of compact f i b e r s , i t can be stated on account of the following lemma.
Lemma.
If
pact f i b r e s and
g : (M,g)-.(N,b)
7e
vertical,
i s a nonconstant harmonic morphism with com-
then
C
* Proof.
* \
.
*
Without l o s s , we s h a l l assume that
M i s connected and 4
tive . How C i s a polar set [15] . so M - C i s connected * * i s connected, too.
Suppose
C,
^ 4 ,
if
verges to some point of
and l e t C
Now take any point so a l l
se
I
. Then
Y1
Y- - Since 1
s t a r t i n g at
s -'e^(Y^(s))
(because
Ve
Since
|M
t
C
y.
F • * y
' ( y ) . Let y
in
H
*
i s a submersion, there i s a h o r i z o n t a l l i f t
T
con-
with endpoint
y , ( I ) E F . Then 1 y
1
by a y.
i s compact, a subsequence of
(y^(l))
x £ C fl F . That i s a contradiction, for T y
(5.9)
If
with
i(x) = k |x I
,
: K - IR 2
sup ^*\{x) I
n
is a Z 1 <
2
T
(x)
converges to some y E ( - | { C ) . $
k-homogeneous polynomial harmonic morphism
, and normalised so that
: I 11 - 1 j
1 .
L
e ( y . ( l ) ) - C. , becau$ 1 1
i s constant ; indeed, -gSj. e^(y^(s)) = < V e ^ ( y ^ ( s ) ) , Y ' ( S ) > = 0
y
m
1
^(C )
is vertical). F
x.
y. - * ( x . ) , 1
can be joined to
point
T
r
e (x.) * o .
y E 8 - ${C ) , and set *
x. x
N - (C.) *
be a sequence such that
t
c.
y. £ N - t(C^) ; furthermore,
smooth path over
(x.) ^ M - C
: therefore
i s surjec-
149 19
Setting
r
£ S
1 0 - 1
Z
:|4.(x)| =
, we have the following results
1)
m-2 £
2)
the function
3)
r
111
in JR
x
[4(x)|
2
1
;
is isoparametric on
is a smooth submanifold of
[2] :
S
m
' ;
S™ ^ ; both K r and the fibre over 0 +
are minimal cones through the origin in IR™ ; : r+S
n
4)
the map
^ is a harmonic Riemannian submersion.
5)
Thus, with reference to Theorem (5.2), we find that for such a harmonic
morphism, the fiber over the origin in IR
D
(which lies in the image of
C ) is a I
minimal cone. (5.10) Problem.
7 4 3 Consider the smooth fibrations f - £. . : S * S with fibre S h,J
and structural group
S0(4) . (Here
s"
denotes the Euclidean
n-sphere, of suita-
ble radius ; and we use the notation of [9] ) . Their Euler number 4 4 H(t j ) tS ] - b+j - 1 i and their Pontyagin numbers p ( S ^) [S ] h
with
(
h
• 2{2h-l)
h(h-l) = 0 mod 56 . Do either of the following assumptions imply that $ is
the Hopf fibration ( i . e . , 1)
h - 0,1) :
Suppose that $ is a harmonic map ; according to Theorem (2.9), that is
equivalent to assuming 2)
div
Suppose that
S,
=
0 .
^ is a harmonic morphism.
I t is known [13] that i f * is a Riemannian submersion with totally geodesic fibres ( i . e . , VS. s 0 ) , then : is the Hopf fibration. t If the response is negative in case I , then perhaps the class [ ]€ir T
7
(S*) = Z • Z
[ 2
has no harmonic representative.
We are indebted to Professor B. Fuglede for calling our attention to the pa¬ per [31
. Recently he
superfluous in Lemma 5.8. appear in due course.
1
has informed us that the phrase "with compact fibres' is His proof leads to substantial generalization
and will
150 20
Appendix to Example (3.1'2)
(3.19) Let * immersion
be as i n ( 3 . 1 2 ) , then we can consider the higher order geometry of the
f : H
t i n g at a point ce at
x
to
+
V ; see [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 1 8 ]
x
. Let
y : E-> H
be a smooth curve i n
M star-
Y(O) , and parametrized by arc length. The p'th o s c u l a t i n g spa-
y i s the span of
]
D Y(x)
where
D/ds
"'' '' '
of
M at
ves y
in
M s t a r t i n g at
x
i s the
V-covariant d e r i v a t i v e along
-r
r (x) P
. The p'th o s c u l a t i n g space
i s the span of a l l the p'th o s c u l a t i n g spaces at x . Of course,
The higher order osculating spaces dimension
y
may vary with
T
T ^'^
x
to a l l c u r -
i s j u s t the tangent space
T (M)
may depend on the immersion ; and i t s
x .
Let
G(n,r ) denote the Grassmannian of r -spaces through the o r i g i n of V : P P endowed with i t s canonical Riemannian m e t r i c , which ue now denote by k ' ' . Let p
U c K
be an open subset on which
r
i s constant. The p'th
Gauss map •
P of the immersion
(3.20)
Y
.
!
P
* defined by
)
: U -+ V
P
Gauss map
) ,
p
V . Thus
v«
is
the
t
x
y^ .
(3.21) The p—normal space to in
t p )
' (x) - T ^ ' , viewed as a subspace of
»
*
is
; (U,g)-.(G(n,r ) , k p x •+ Y '
,
1 1
T ' * ' * . He define
the
H at
(p+1) —
x
i s the orthogonal complement
N
P
P
' ' <** T ' ^
fundamental form of the immersion at
x
by the
formula
where
P
V (d.) *
the d e r i v a t i v e
C(« d,
p + 1
T*(K) •
; and at
As i n example (3.12)
x
, '(T(V)) ,
p
ir' ' x
i s the
p—
covariant d i f f e r e n t i a l of
i s the projection
we consider the d i f f e r e n t i a l
T , , ( v ) -* N *lxj x dy
p
* ' , and obtain the
151 21
analogue of
(3.13)
:
(3.23) P r o p o s i t i o n .
I n any common domain of d e f i n i t i o n we have
dy
- P (P*",
I n the s p i r i t of the theorem of Ruh-Vilms, we s h a l l say that the immersion $ p
has p— order constant mean curvature i f Trace (vfi ^ * ' ' ) = o . Then He have the
I (3.24) C o r o l l a r y . Gauss map y
(p)
The map $ has
order constant mean curvature i f f i t s p —
. i s harmonic.
*
I n g e n e r a l , even i f
.-. has constant Oean curvature, i t w i l l not have p—
order constant mean curvature for (3.25) L e t
p—
p > \ , as we s h a l l see i n Example ( 3 . 2 3 ) .
M be a Riemann surface and n
> :(M,g) • (JK
g
a conformal metric on
i s an isometric immersion, we decompose the s t r e s s energy 1
tensor of i t s a s s o c i a t e d p** Gauss map > * t 2
(3.26) S
' S -°> • S
w
H . If
( 0
'
2 )
.
where
: M->G(n,r ) , as i n ( 4 . 2 ) and ( 4 . 6 ) : P S
t 0
-
2 )
-
2
S< '
0 )
. Now from P r o p o s i t i o n
(3.23) we have
3
2 7
S
< ' >
((P) n l "" i l " . -
(3.28) Example•
If
"I * - T H i s an E i n s t e i n manifold and
f : ti^' ^ T1 > * :
IR
i s a minimal immersion, then * so
y
i s sn immersion of constant mean curvature ; and
i s harmonic. By a theorem of Huto [26] , y
i s homothetic. By Lemma (3.29)
below, we find T y
(
2
)
+
-
E
j
R
( l )
( d y (e ),dy ) dy ( e . ) » * • • 1
This w i l l be zero only i f
dy,
.
maps the tangent space of
H at each point into a
( subspace of
TG(n,r^)
be f l a t [26]
. I n c i d e n t a l l y , i n (3.25)
metrics
g
of zero c u r v a t u r e . A necessary condition for that i s that M
on Riemann s u r f a c e s .
we always have examples of such E i n s t e i n
152 22
(3.29) Lemma. 7dy « * Trace vdy '
Edy P
+
l
)
y ' ' #
is nomothetic, so that
. then
I
W
- V Trace dy .
(
where
P
In the case when
T
p
R* '
denotes the curvature of
mal b a s i s for
G(n,r ) , and P
1 ,
i s an orthono-
I < 1 £ D
H•
Proof.
For
x € M ; choose vectors
(e.) 1
form an orthonormal b a s i s for
Trace
(e.)
W, <**» +
(
e j
) •
T H • and 7 e. x e. j
I
V^/"*''
51 .
7
7
t.
e.
dy
. such that at 1 i i Sm - 0 . Then for each i
x
the e. 1
C^K*,) < P )
(e. ) .
I
But 7 , Trace Ij
{Trace
Tdy * •
vdy.
( p
p )
*"
-
£
.
7 7 d e. e. .
- 7 Trace
H
^
(
p
)
(e.)
T
7dY,
R <
P
t p )
W
,
*
1
.
) (e.)
P
>
(.,) 1
. d
p )
T
*
<*><,.» dy< (e.) J # 1
.
The authors record t h e i r thanks to Dr. John C. Wood for h i s correspondence concerning material i n t h i s s e c t i o n .
153 23
REFERENCES.
[]]
G. Andrzejczak, On some form determined by a distribution on a Riemannian manifold. C o l l . Hath. 41 (1978)), 79-83.
[2]
P. Baird, Warwick Thesis. (In preparation).
LJJ
A. Bernard, E.A. Cambell, and A.M. Davie, Brownian motion and generalized analytic and inner functions. Ann. Inst. Fourier 29 (1979), 207-228.
[4]
E. Calabi, Minimal immersions of surfaces in Euclidean spheres. J . Diff. Geo.
[5l
1 (1967), 111-125.
E . Calabi, Quelques applications de l'analyse complexe aux surfaces d'aire minima. Topics in complex manifolds. Univ. Montreal (1967), 59-81.
[6]
S.S. Chern, On the minimal immersions of the two-sphere in a space of constant curvature. Problems in Analysis. Princeton (1970), 27-40.
[7]
S.S. Chern, On minimal spheres in the four-sphere. Studies and Essays Presented to Y.H. Chen. Taiwan (1970), 137-150.
[8]
n
A.M. Din and H . J . Zakrzewski, General classical solutions in the CP ' model. Lapp. Annecy (1980).
[93
J . Eells and N.H. Kuiper, An invariant for certain smooth manifolds. Ann. di Mat. 60 (1963), 93-110.
[101
J . Eells and L . Lemaire, A report on harmonic maps. Bull. London Math. Soc. 10 (1978),
[11]
1-68.
J . Eells and J.H,Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds. Am. J . Math. 86 (1969),
109-160.
El2]
J . Eells and J . C . Wood, Harmonic spheres in projective spaces.To appear.
[13]
R.H. Escobales, Riemannian submersions uith totally geodesic fibres. J . Diff. Geo.
10 (1975), 2S3-276.
114}
The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Addison-Wesley (1964).
Il5]
B. Fuglede, Harmonic morphism between Riemannian manifolds. Ann. Institut Fourier
28 (1978), 107-144.
154 24 [16]
G. Gerardi, C. Meyers, and M. De Roo, On the self-duality of solutions of the Yang-Mills equations. Physics Letters 73B <1978), 468-470.
[17]
V. Giaser and R. Stora, Regular solution of the CP^ models and further generalizations. (Manuscript 1980).
[18]
P. Griffiths and J . Harris, Algebraic geometry and local differential geometry. Ann. E.N.S. 12 (1979), 355-432.
[19]
S-W. Hawking and G.F.R. E l l i s , The large scale structure of space time. Cambridge Monographs on Matb. Physics (1973).
[ 20]
D. Hilbert, Die Grundlagen der Physik; Nachr. Ges. Hiss. Gottingeo (1915), 395-407 ; (1917), 53-76. And Math. Ann. 92 (1924), 1-32.
[21]
D. Hoffman and R. Osserman, The area of the generalized Gaussian image and the stability of minimal surface in
[ 22]
S
n
n
and lR . Preprint (1980).
D. Hoffman and R. Osserman, The geometry of the generalized Gauss map. Preprint (1980).
[ 23]
I . Ishihara, A mapping of Riemannian manifolds which preserves harmonic functions. J . Math. Kyoto Univ. 19 (1979), 215-229.
[24]
F.W. Kamber and P. Tondeur, Harmonic foliations. Preprint (1980).
[ 25]
Y. Muto, Critical Riemannian metrics. Tensor, N.S. 29 (1975), 125-133.
[ 26]
Y. Muto, Submanifolds of a Euclidean space with nomothetic Gauss map. J.Math. Soc. Japan, vol 32, n°3 (1980).
[ 27]
M. Obata, The Gauss map of immersions of Riemannian manifolds in spaces of constant curvature. J . Diff. Geo. 2 (1968), 217-223.
[ 28]
E.M. Patterson, A class of c r i t i c a l Riemannian metrics. Univ. Aberdeen (1980X
[ 29]
R.C. Reilly, On the Hessian of a function and the curvatures of its graph. Mich. Math. J . 20 (1973), 373-383.
[ 30]
R.C. Reilly, Variational properties of functions of the mean curvatures for hypersurfaces in space forms.
[ 31]
E.A. Ruh and J . Vilms, The tension field of the Gauss map. Trans. A.M.S. 149 (1970), 569-573.
155
25
[32]
B- gummier, Quelques n o t i o n s simples en geomStrie riemannienne e t l e u r s a p p l i c a t i o n s aux f e u i l l e t a g e s compacts, Comm. Math- Helv. 54 (1979), 224-239,
[331
Sachs and H . H . Wu, General r e l a t i v i t y f o r mathematicians. Springer Graduate Texts 48 (1977),
[34]
H . C . J . Sealey,
Some p r o p e r t i e s o f harmonic mappings. Warwick Thesis (1980).
[35]
G. T a n y i , Harmonic maps i n mechanics. P r e p r i n t , Univ. Yaoundi ( 1 9 7 7 ) .
[36 ]
G. T o t h , One-parameter curvature. Preprint
[37]
f a m i l i e s o f harmonic maps i n t o spaces o f constant
(I960).
A. Van de Ven, On the Chern numbers o f surfaces
o f general t y p e . I n v . Math.
36 (1976), 285-293. [33]
J . V i l m s , T o t a l l y geodesic maps. J . D i f f .
Geo. 4 (1970), 73-79.
[39]
P.G. Walczak, On f o l i a t i o n s w i t h leaves s a t i s f y i n g some g e o m e t r i c a l c o n d i t i o n s . I n s t . Math. PAN 1980. n ° 2 1 0 .
[40]
H. Weyl, Space, t i m e , m a t t e r . Dover 1950.
[41]
C M . Wood, Warwick T h e s i s . ( I n p r e p a r a t i o n ) .
[42]
J . C . Wood, C o n f o r m a l i t y and h o l o m o r p h i c i t y o f c e r t a i n harmonic maps. print
1980).
(Pre-
156
MAPS OF MINIMUM ENERGY J. E E L L S AND J . C. WOOD
1. Introduction
It is well known that a holomorphic map
1
Any map
which minimises energy is
(We write these alternatives togelher as ±holomorphic.) In fact, we can take any Riemannian metric on P'. THEOREM
(Siu-Vau [15]).
1
Any map tp: P -» P" which minimises energy is
± hoiomorphic.
In fact, they draw that conclusion when the target is any compact Kahier n-manifold N with strictly positive holomorphic bisectional curvature and go on to provide a proof of Frankefs conjecture that N is biholomorphically isomorphic to P" THEOREM
(Siu [14]).
/ / M has genus 1, then any map
energy is + holomorphic.
As a consequence, let us note that such a tj> must have degree ^ ± 1 - It is not known to us whether there exists a harmonic map $: M -> P" of degree ± 1 , where genus M = 1 and n ^ 2. The purpose of this note is to generalise these results as follows. For any almost complex manifold N let $ denote the set of integral homology classes [yj in H (N) represented by holomorphic maps y: P -* N. Note that if such a y is nonconstant, ihen [v] has infinite order in H {N). 2
1
2
T H E O R E M . Let M be a closed Riemann surface and N a simply-connected Kahier manifold. Iftp: M -> N minimises energy in its homotopy class and i/[0] € then tp is holomorphic. (//[<£] 6 — M, then tp is antiholomorphic.) 1
The case where H {N) = Z and is generated by a holomorphic map P -* N is particularly imporlant; for then H iN) = i u ( — 3(\ and we have the following. 2
2
Received 18 January, 1980. [J.
LONDON MATH.
Soc.
(2), (1981),
303-310]
157 l EELLS AND J. C. WOOD
304
COROLLARY L Let M be a closed Riemann surface and N a simply-connected Kahier manifold with H (N) — Z generated by a holomorphic map P -» N. Then any map tp: M -*. N with minimum energy is + holomorphic. 1
2
There are two points in our proof (which, incidentally, is entirely different from those of [14, 15]). One is, an exploitation of the above-mentioned result of Lemaire—which in turn is an application of a construction due to Morrey [10; Theorem 1.2]; the argument is essentially 2-dimensional, being based on the conformal invariance of the energy functional (§3). The second point is a simple closure property for holomorphic maps between almost Kahier manifolds, based on an observation of Lichnerowicz [8]; specifically, we define f-holomorphic maps, which for 2-dimensional targets are like the e-conformal maps of Morrey [10; Chapter 1]. The authors express their gratitude to Luc Lemaire for discovering and analysing two errors in a preliminary version of this paper.
2. Discussion of the hypotheses, and examples
1. Tacitly we have assumed that all maps are continuous and belong to the Sobolev class L \ . That condition insures that an extremal of the energy functional is C " [2; §3.6]. See also [2; §10.12]. 2. The condition that \_4>~]e® (or [<£] e -®) cannot be omitted from the Theorem. For example, the maps P -> P x P defined by z -* (z\z~'), where k,l are positive integers, are of minimum energy in their homotopy classes, but are not ± holomorphic. 1
1
1
3. The condition of minimum energy cannot be omitted from Corollary 1, Tor there are harmonic maps P - » P " ( 0 2) which are not ±holomorphic [3]. 1
4. The theorem remains true if "'Kahier" is replaced by '"almost Kahier". However in this case it is difficult to determine when H {N,Z) is holomorphically generated. 2
5. Since N is simply-connected, a classical theorem of Hurewicz provides a canonical isomorphism h : n (N) -* H {N). Consequently our definition of i# could have been formulated in terms of homotopy classes. 2
2
If N is not simply-connected, then the conclusion of the theorem can be expected only under substantially modified conditions. For instance, suppose n,(N) £ 0 and it (N) — 0. Then every homotopy class H e [Ai, /V] is represented by a map of minimum energy [6, 11]—and these are not ±holomorphic, in general. Now, let Q be a Riemann surface of genus ^ 1. Then Corollary 1 fails for certain minimal maps tp : M -> P x Q: if we choose tp = 4>i) so that tp, : M — P' is holomorphic and 4> : M -* Q is not holomorphic but minimising energy, then E{ip) = E(4> )+E{
1
2
i
2
6. A theorem of Sacks-Uhlenbeck [11] asserts that if N is a compact simplyconnected Riemannian manifold, then H [N) is generated by maps P' -» N of minimum energy, each such map being a minimal branched immersion. 2
158 MAPS O F M I N I M U M
ENERGY
305
By way of contrast, there are compact simply-connected Kahier manifolds N for which any holomorphic map tp : M -* N is constant, where M is any compact Riemann surface. For instance, consider K-3 surfaces. (These are compact simply-connected Kahlerian surfaces, characterised by the conditions H {N, E> ) — 0 and c (S) — 0; they are all diffeomorphic to a nonsingular quartic in P , and H (N) — Z . ) According to a theorem of Yau [19], they all admit Ricci-flat Kahier metrics. It is known [9] that certain K-3 surfaces carry no curves. Consequently, any holomorphic map of a compact Riemann surface M into N is necessarily constant, (We are indebted to Mites Reid for instruction on K-3 surfaces.) Thus we have examples of compact simply-connected Kahier manifolds N with H {N) generated by maps of minimum energy which are not + holomorphic. l
N
t
3
2 2
2
2
7. On the other hand, there are many compact simply-connected Kahier manifolds N satisfying the conditions of Corollary 1. We note some standard examples, without proof. Example. Consider the Grassmannian G{k,k + n) of complex it-planes through the origin in C* . We have the homogeneous space representation + n
G(k,k + n) = U(k + n)/U(k)xU(n) and P" -
LHl+n)/U{l)xU(n).
There are canonical embeddings ]
n
P -* P -*... -> U(k + n)/U(k)xU{n). 1
The embedding P -*G{k,k+n) H (G{k,k+n)) = Z.
is totally geodesic, holomorphic, and generates
2
Example. We may proceed similarly for the complex quadrics 1
6. = SO(2 + n)/SO(2)xSO(n) = {[z,
JjJeP *":^/
=0}.
We have canonical embeddings 1
P - SO(3)/SO(2)xSO(l)-
... - SO(2 + n)/SO(2)xSO{n)
Here H (Q„) = Z if n f 2; if n = 2, then H {Q„) = Z 0 Z , and since Q biholomorphic to P x P 2
2
1
t
is
l
m = ( ( r , s ) e Z © Z : r , s ^ 0} 2
We may proceed similarly for the space SO(2n)/U{n) of complex structures on R ": P' = S0(4}/U(2) -* ... -» SO{2n)/U(n)
(n > 2).
As an application of the Theorem with N — Q , we cite the following. n
159 306
J . E E L L S AND J. C WOOD 2
2. If
2
Proof. We recall that y* is antiholomorphic if and only if q) is a minimal immersion [1] and lhat y* is holomorphic if and only if M = S . Thus if n £ 2, the assertion follows immediately from Corollary 1. If » = 2 we appeal to Blaschke's theorem (see [3; §6] for details), which asserts that the homology class f_y*] e H (Q ) has the form [y*] = ( 1 - p ) [ S ] + (1-p)[S_], where Q is expressed as the product S+ x S _ of two projective lines and p = genus Af. Thus, in the case when n = 2, Corollary 2 follows from our Theorem. 2
2
+
2
2
n+ 1
Example. If N is a hyperplane in P or degree d < In, then iV contains a linear subspace P of P " ; and it generates H (N) = Z (n ^ 2). 1
+1
2
8. Problem. Is the Theorem valid if we define St more generally as the set of integral homology classes expressible in the form £ *f&i]> where J. ^ 0 and y,: P' -* N are hoiomorphic maps? ;
9. On any Kahlerian manifold N satisfying the hypotheses of our Theorem we may take any Kahier metric compatible with the given complex structure. 10. Problem. If M is a compact non-orientable surface with given conformal structure, is a map
Q
3. Nearly holomorphic maps Let M, N be Kahier manifolds with Af compact, and
dtp: T (M) -
0A
d$ = b%:T'-°(M)
dtp : T'-°(M) -* T '°(iV),
0
i
U0
T {N);
also, d^^dqS:
l
T°- (M)->
T (N),
->
T°-'(N).
That induces a decomposition of the energy density e(tp) = e'(
160 MAPS O F MINIMUM ENERGY 2
307
2
e'(tp) — \\dtp\\ and e"(
jV'Wdx
E{
M
= E'{
M
Setting K(tp) = E'(
For e > 0 we say that a map
E"(4>) < E. We say that a homotopy class Jf of maps M -* N contains nearly holomorphic maps if for every E > 0 there is an £-holomorphic map in jtf, that is, if inf£"| = 0 . r
Of course, a holomorphic map is e-holomorphic for all e > 0. There is an analogous notion of containing nearly anti-holomorphic maps. It is known [8] that if a homotopy class contains both a holomorphic map and an antiholomorphic map, then both are constant. PROPOSITION !. If contains nearly holomorphic maps, then any map tp of minimum energy is holomorphic.
Proof. If tp minimises E, then
are almost Hermltian manifolds, and
e"Wo
If M and N are compact, then ,
£"(i>oaS) ^ 2maxe'(i/')£"(^) + 2maxe"(^)£ ( >). v
Proof.
We have 1
e"(yo
2
^ \\m\\ i i ^ i i + i w i i i i t V i i , 2
2
1
2
^ 2 | | # | f | | ^ | | + 2||cty|| \\d
2
using {A + Bf % 2-4 -t-2B . The lemma follows immediately. PROPOSITION 2. Let M, N, P be almost Hermltian manifolds with M, N compact. Let Jr"e[M,/V], J f E [/V,/?] be homotopy classes. Suppose Jf contains nearly
161
308
I. E E L L S AND J. C WOOD
holomorphic maps and Jf contains a holomorphic map, or vice versa. o JC == \\p o tp '•
Then
Proof. Given E > 0, choose ^ e to be holomorphic. Then choose
4. Proof of our main results
The following lemma and proposition should be compared with Morrey [10; Theorem 1.2] and Lemaire [6,9]. L E M M A 3. Let D be the closed unit disc of C and S the Euclidean 2-sphere. For any point qeS, s > 0, and integer d there exists a continuous piecewise smooth map f: (£>, BD) - (S,q) of degree d such that E(f) < |tf|Area(S) + e and E"(f) < e if d^O, and £'{/) < eifdsi 0.
Proof. If d = 0, define f(D) = q. Otherwise, without loss of generality we may suppose that d > 0. Let (r, 6) be polar coordinates in D and let B be the concentric disc of radius | j let (R, w] be polar coordinates on S centred at q, and let C be the polar cap 0 ^ R < n (0 < n < n; the number n will be chosen in the course of the proof). We define / ; D -* S as follows. On B define / to be the unique holomorphic map [B,dB)-*(S-C,8C) with boundary values / ( i , 0 ) = (n,d &). On the annulus D — 8 define f: D-B -> C by f{r,8) = (2(1 -r)n, d • 8). Then e"{f\ ) = 0, and, for e
(r,8)eD-B, e"[f\ - )^e(f\ . ), D
e(f\ - ) D
2
where h = h ,dR Kf
E"(f)
B
0 B
= UW' + WM'/r
B
2
+ h „dca u
2
= h^-^
+
is the polar representation of the metric h on S; thus 2
s: (max /? )(4i! )Area(D-B) + m a x A c
2
h^d/r) ,
"
RR
fdY
-\dA. ,r,
o-a
Now as if -* 0 we have max /i^„ -* 0 and max h„ remains bounded. Therefore, given E > 0 we can choose i| sufficiently small that both right hand members are less than E/2. Then £ " ( / ) < s. Finally, E{f\ ) = Area (/| ) because f\ is conformal [4; §4]. c
B
c
B
E(f)
R
B
= £ ( / | ) - r £ ( / | . ) ^ rf. Area(S) + £. fl
D
fl
PROPOSITION 3. Let M be a closed Riemann surface and S the Euclidean 2-sphere: take q£S. Then for any E > 0 and integer d there is a smooth map f:M -* S of degree d such that
£ ( / ) < |d|Area(S) + e; £"(/) < e if
d>0;
162
MAPS
OF
MINIMUM
ENERGY
309
and E'(f) < £ if
i&Q.
Proof. Choose a disc D cz M; by the conformal invariance of E and £", we can assume that D is the unit disc. Define / ; D -» S as in Lemma 3, and f(M — D) — q. Then / is a continuous piecewise smooth map with the desired properties; clearly f can be approximated to satisfy the requirements of Proposition 3. Lemaire derives his result quoted in Section 1 from Proposition 3, by noting that if tp : Af -» S minimises energy, then E{tp) — Area (tp), and so tp is conformal. Proof of the Theorem. By Proposition 1, it suffices to show that the homotopy class Jf of tp contains nearly holomorphic maps. Firstly tb is homotopic to a map factoring through a standard 2-sphere S:
M
. Af
Indeed, we can take a CW decomposition of M,N in which Af is formed by attaching a single 2-cell to a bouquet of circles, and the 2-skeleton of N is a bouquet of 2-spheres. Then deform
t
References 1. S. S. Chern and R. Osserman, "Complete minimal surfaces in Euclidean n-space". J. Analyse Math., 19 (1967), 15-34. 2. J. Eells and L. Lemaire. "A report on harmonic maps", Bull. London Math. Soc, 10 (1978), 1-68. 3. J. Eells and L. Lemaire, "On the construction of harmonic and holomorphic maps between surfaces", preprint, Institut des Hautes Eludes Scienlifiques. 1978. 4. J. Eells and J. H. Sampson, "Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds", Amer. J. Math., 84 (1964), 109-160. 5. J. Eells and J. C. Wood, "Restrictions on harmonic maps of surfaces". Topology, 15 (1976), 263-266. 6. L. Lemaire, "Applications harmoniques de surfaces riemanniennes", J. Differential Geom., 13 (1978) 51-78. 7. L. Lemaire, "Minima and critical points of Ihe energy in dimension two". Global Differential Geometry/Global Analysis, Proceedings of a Conference, Berlin, 1979.
8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
Lecture Notes in
Mathematics (Springer. Berlin, to appear). A. Lichnerowicz. "Applications harmoniques et varietes kahier iennes". Sjmp. Math 3 (1970) 341— 402. A. L Mayer, "Families of K-3 surfaces". Klagoya Math J.. 48 (1973). 1-17. C. B. Morrey. "The problem of Plateau on a Riemannian manifold", Ann. of Math., 49 (1948) 807-851. J. Sacks and K. Uhlenbeck, 'The existence of minimal immersions of two-spheres". Bull. Amer. Math. Soc, 83 (1977). 1033-1036. I. R. Safarevit, et al. Algebraic surfaces. Translations of the American Mathematical Society (American Mathematical Society, Providence. 1967). Y. -T. Siu. "The com plei-analy! icily of harmonic maps and the strong rigidity of compact Kahier manifolds", Ann. of Math., to appear.
163 310
MAPS OF MINIMUM ENERGY
14. Y. -T. Siu. "Some remarks on The complex analyticity of harmonic maps". Southeast Asian Bull Math.. 3 11979), 240-253. 15. Y. -T. Siu and S. -T. Yau. "Compact Kahier manifolds of positive bisectional curvature", preprint, Stanford University. 1979. 16. D. Toledo. "Harmonic maps from surfaces into certain Kahier manifolds". Math Scand., 45 (1979). 13-26. 17. J . C . Wood, •"Holomorphicity of certain harmonic maps from a surface to complex projective N-space". J. London Math. Soc. (2), 20 [1979), 137-142. 18. J . C . Wood. "Conform alky and holomorphicity of certain harmonic maps", preprint. University of Leeds, 1979. 19. S. -T. Yau. "On the Ricci curvature of a compact Kahier manifold and the complex Monge-Ampere equation". Comm. Pure & Appl. Mailt, 31 (1978). 339-411.
Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL. Department of Pure Mathematics. University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT.
164 latituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica Francesco Severi Symposia Mathematics Volume X X V I [ 19821
THE OF
EXISTENCE CERTAIN
AND CONSTRUCTION H A R M O N I C M A P S {*)
J . E E L L S and J . C . W O O D (**)
Introduction. This paper studies two types of interrelationships between harmonic and holomorphic maps. Pirstly, we recall some theorems asserting the holomorphicity of harmonic maps from a Riemann surface M to complex projective m-space P . These generalize a theorem of the authors [ E - W l ] which asserts that any harmonic map from a compact Biemann surface of genus j> (i£ 0) to the 2-sphere P is holomorphic if its degree ^p. This last result has the corollary that there exists no harmonic map of degree one from the 2-torus to the 2-sphere P' (whatever metrics these are given). n
!
For some time the question: does there exist a harmonic map of degree one from the 2-torus to P" has been open. We answer this by discussing a method of constructing certain harmonic maps of an arbitrary Riemann surface into P" and Grassmannians from holomorphic maps. This method is based on work of Din-Zakrzewski [D-Zl], Burns and Glaser-Stora [G-S] and gives all harmonic maps into P from the 2-sphere and all harmonic maps into P" of non-zero degree from the 2-torus. Using this method we can assert that, for n ^ 2, there exist harmonic non-holomorphic maps to complex projective n-space (i) of all degrees from the torus and the sphere, (ii) of degrees 0 or S p -f 1 from a compact Riemann surface of genus p. These results contrast sharply with the case n = 1. n
Full proofs of these results will appear in [E-W3]. We should like to thank K . Abe, M. Guest, M. Ishida, M. Murray, M. S. Narasimhan, J . Rawnsley and R . Stora for stimulating conversations on the above subject matter. (*) I risultati conseguiti in questo lavoro sono stati espoati nelle conferenze tenute il 26 maggio 1981. (**) Research supported by the Sonderforschungsbereioh t Theoretiache Mathematik s, Universitat Bonn.
165 124
J . E e l l s and J . C . Wood
1, Harmonic and holomorphic maps. m
{A) A map
9 ' = 2 T-JS*>
? =
2
The equation 3"y — 0 is a first order linear elliptic system for the » components (gj , ...,
n
Trace 3 ' 3 > = 0 where M as T r a c e 3 ' 3 " = y ~Ar=- . = i dz" dz a
a
The equation Traee d'd"q> — 0 is a second-order linear elliptic system in divergence form. We observe that every ± holomorphic map is harmonic. A comparison of the theories of harmonic and ± holomorphic maps shows, in particular, that each has substantial advantages that the other lacks. For instance, 1) ± holomorphic maps are closed under compositions; harmonic maps compose only under special circumstances ( s e e [ E - L l ] ) ; 2) harmonic maps are the extrema of the energy integral E(f) = iij\d
m
m
(integration with respect to Lebesgue measure on C over any compact domain in U). (B) Consider now the problem of transferring these notions to maps tp: M -> N between complex manifolds. The concept of ± holomorphic maps has an immediate extension, because of 1) above. On the other hand, globalization of the concept of harmonic maps is much more subtle. I n particular, starting from the characterization
166 The existence and construction of certain hormonio maps
126
of harmonic map in terms of the variational integral E defined in 2), we see that we need Hermitian metrics on both M and N in order to have a good norm for the partial differentials d'tp and d"
d'dY+VWV) yl
here 1%, = h (d hf ) a
x
=0
(1 ^ y < n);
are the Christoffel symbols of N.
(D) Our primary objective is to study the interrelationships between harmonic and ± holomorphic maps
2. Existence and holomorphicity of harmonic maps. (A) For a survey of existence theory relevant to these lectures we suppose that M and N are compact Eiemannian manifolds. The first major result was proved by the first author and J . Sampson [13-8] j
167 126
J . Eslla and J . C. Wood
namely, if N has non-positive Biemannian sectional curvatures then in any homotopy class of maps M N there exists a harmonic map which is a minimum of E in its homotopy class. Hartman [Ha] proved uniqueness (with some trivial exceptions) under the hypothesis that N has strictly negative Riemannian sectional curvatures. Such theorems can be used to study homotopy problems, for example the fundamental group of a manifold of negative curvature [Wo2]. {B) Now suppose that M is a Riemann surface. Then L . Lemaire [Le] and J . Sacks-K. Uhlenbeck [S-U] proved existence of a harmonic map under the weaker hypothesis that the seeond homotopy group of N is zero (see also [S-Y]). (<7) The first interesting case not covered by the existence theorem is when N is the 2-sphere S*. Let M denote a compact Riemann surface without boundary, of genus j i ^ O . Then we have a holomorphicity theorem: p
2
[E-W] Any harmonic map M„ S of degree 3: p is holomorphic. I n particular, any harmonic map S S is ^ holomorphic and any harmonic map from the 2-torus T' to the 2-sphere of non-zero degree is ± holomorphic. The last statement implies the first non-existence theorem for harmonic maps: 2
1
1
[E-W]
There is no harmonic map from the 2-torus to the 2-sphere of degree 1 .
I n these theorems the spaces may be given any smooth metrics. I n contrast to the holomorphicity theorem, Lemaire shows [Le2]: For any, d, 0 d g p — 1, there exists a Biemann surface M„ and a harmonic non-holomorphic map M ^>-8* of degree d. Here S is given a sufficiently symmetrical metric. For related non-orientable cases see [ E - L 2 ] . 1
v
(_Z>) I n the case that the domain is a manifold-with-boundary there are existence results for harmonic maps similar to these in [A) and [B), see [Ham, Le3], The second author announces the following non-existence result [Wo6]: m
Let
Here D may have its standard metric or certain other metrics and there are variants for harmonic maps from annuli etc., see [Wo6].
168 The existence and construction of certain harmonic maps
127
For m = 2, this result was given by Lemaire [ L e i ] : it is the first non-existence result for dimension greater than two; there are, as yet, no non-existence results in the boundaryless case for such dimensions. (E) We return now to the consideration of harmonic maps between manifolds without boundary. The second interesting case not covered by the existence theory is that of harmonic maps from a Riemann surface to complex projective space P" equipped with its Fubini-Study metric of constant holomorphic sectional curvature 4. Homotopy classes of maps M„ P" are classified by their degree = degree of the induced map on second cohomology. There are several known holomorphicity theorems generalizing that of § 2G: [Wo4] Let tp: M -s- P" be a harmonic map of degree p . Suppose that for all x e M, dxp. (T,M ) is contained in a one-dimensional complex subspace of T , P {i.e. a two real-dimensional subspace of T ^ P " which is closed under the action of the almost-complex structure). Then tp is holomorphic. I n fact, the last condition need only be approximately satisfied; note that it is automatic if ti = l and so the theorem reduces to that of §2(7. v
c
v
n
W l
[Wo4]
Any harmonic map M -> P" of degree 2j 2p — 1 such that the (0,1) energy E"(tp) s|f.3*$>||-* is less than jifdegrp- (2p— 2)} is holomorphic. v
M
For a further theorem of this type see [Wo5]. We have a different type of result involving minimality of the energy [E-W3] (given by Lemaire [Lei] for n = 1): Any harmonic map M -> P" of absolute minimum energy within its homotopy class is J~ holomorphic. B
For low genus the condition of absolute minimum energy can be relaxed: [Si-Y, S i l ] . For p = 0 or 1 any harmonic map M P" of index 0 is ± holomorphic (c.f. § 6B). A. Futaki [Fu] gives further minimum energy theorems for p — 0. s
(F) The results above show that harmonic maps M„ P" satisfying further conditions are ± holomorphic. We can get a second type of result by relaxing the condition of holomorphicity. Firstly, recall that a map tp: M ->• N between Riemannian manifolds is said to be (weakly) conformal if there exists a smooth function X: M -> - y [ 0 , co) such that ||<%(X)|| = for all xe M, XeT^M. A map between Riemann surfaces is weakly conformal if and only if it is ± holomorphic. A ±_ holomorphic map from a Riemann sur-
169 128
J . Eolls and J . C . Wood
face to an almost Hermitian manifold is weakly conformal; of course, the converse is false. The second statement of § 2C above generalizes to the theorem [Wol]: any harmonic map from the 2-sphere to an arbitrary Riemannian manifold is weakly conformal. This result can be improved for harmonic maps into P" as follows: say that a map tp: M - » P" from a Riemann surface M is (complex) isotropic (earlier terminology: strongly pseudoholomorphic) if it satisfies at each point of M
(2.1)
<(D')*V, <-*>")V> = 0
all
fi^l.
Here .D' and D" denote the (1, 0) and (0,1) parts of the connection D on
sm
[ D - Z l , G-S]
Any harmonic map tp: S*
P" is
isotropic.
[E-W3]
Any harmonic map cp: T ^ P" » / non-zero degree is isotropic .
!
These may be regarded as generalizations of the second and third results of § 2(7.
3. The clarification theorem. (A) I t is reasonable to expeet that in the near future we shall acquire a rather full knowledge of the harmonic maps of Riemann surfaces into irreducible Hermitian symmetric spaces—given knowledge of such holomorphic maps. Let us map out a strategy. The irreducible Hermitian symmetric spaces are divided into six classes of dual pairs [He]. Each pair has a compact and a noncompact form and canonical metrics of curvature s 0 and ^ 0 respectively. The compact form is a simply connected projective manifold. Tbe noncompact forms are naturally embedded as Stein manifolds in their duals [Bo]. I n fact the noncompact form is one of a finite
170 The existence and construction of certain harmonic maps
129
number of orbits of a certain Lie group action on the compact form; the others of these orbits have pseudo-Kahler metrics (not definite) [Wol]. (B)
EXAMPLE:
Let C "
+ 1
=
{(s",
z*): z* e C } .
For a, w e C
n + 1
define Q(z, w) = 2z*«5*. Then C"+'\0 = {z: Q(z, z) > 0} contains the i-o unit sphere = {z: Q(z, z) — 1}. Its tangent space T,S* has horizontal subspace TfS*** = {*>e TJ3** : BeQ{iz, w) = 0}. F i x c > 0 and set ft(X, J ) = 2/c ReQLX, J ) . Then fe| H . „ is positive definite. H+1
1
1
r
S n
The natural multiplication of C* = C \ 0 on the components of C " \ 0 is a free holomorphic action whose quotient is P": n: C"+'\0 -*• -*• P". The U(l) action on S is free and defines a submersion n: P» with tfoi(z): T f S*** -> T P " an isometry. + l
, n + 1
1
m
Alternatively,
set
5(2, w) = z*w° — ^z*w*. 2n+1
Then
TP=
n+
{zeC ':
+ 1
(f(*. •) > 0} contains S = { s e C " : Q(z, z) = l } . Its tangent space TjflM1 = ( w e C : Re#(», w) = 0} has horizontal subspace n f l
TfS""*
1
= {we T,S*-*>:
Re0(iw>, z) = 0} .
Fix c < 0 and set £(2T, Y ) = — 2/e Re<3(X, T ) . Then K L M U M is positive definite. Now Ty* is C*-stable in C"+ \0 and the quotient of W by C * is H " : = { M E C > : |W>| < 1{. I n fact we have a commutative diagram l
1
0
, B + I
where 5i{2 , «•) = ( a / ? , T h e set S is U(l) stable and the action of U{1) on it defines a submersion n: -> H", with 0
dn(z):
1
TfS "*
1
-> T
m
H" an isometry.
Now i is a holomorphic embedding of the complex hyperbolic space H" into P" and H", P" are duals in the sense mentioned in (A). The metric ft on P" is the Fubini-Study metric of constant positive holomorphic sectional curvature. The metric h on H" is the Bergman metric of constant negative holomorphic sectional curvature. Of course i is not an isometric embedding but it is possible to relate certain harmonic maps into H" with holomorphic maps via the classification theorem below; the details will appear elsewhere.
171 130
J . Eells and J . C. Wood
(C) The classification theorem. Let M be a Riemann surface (not necessarily compact) and let / : M P" be a holomorphic map which is full, i.e., does not have image in any projective subspace. We define its associated curves f : M G {C ) for O ^ K ^ » as follows: Let xeM. L e t /p: U —> C \ 0 be a lift of / over a coordinate open set V of M with complex coordinate z which contains x. To be consistent with our D', D" notation we let 3', 3" denote djds, djdz. Form the multivector /r/A37r/A--.A3'7o- If this is non-zero at x, set f„(x) = = (a 4" l)-dimensional subspace determined by the multivector. Then f is well-defined independently of the local coordinate used and (by holomorphicity) may be extended to points xeM where the multivector is zero {see [Wu]). Note that = it is convenient to set f_j = zero map. Using 3" derivatives in place of 3' derivatives, we can define in a similar manner the associated curves of an antiholomorphic map. We define the polar curve g: M P " of / as the antiholomorphic map g = f£_ M > f?„(C" ) A> fl|(C« ) = P"; / and g satisfy the isotropy relations +1
a
a+1
B + 1
a
+1
+1
l
(3.1)
f ign a
for a, ^ 0 ,
or, in terms of local lifts f
n
a
+
S < n - l
and g of / and g; G
W%r, d"%> = 0 + i
where < , ) is the standard Hermitian inner product on C " . Thus, given a full holomorphic map / : M P" and an integer r, 0^ « we may define a map
1
f,_,(x) -nf (x) r
or equivalently (3.3)
= (/,_ ^)0ff _.(a'))1
L
s
where g is the polar of / , and s = n — r. CLASSIFICATION T H E O R E M : Let M be an arbitrary Riemann surface. The formula (3.2) defines a bijective correspondence between full isotropic harmonic maps cp: M -> P" and pairs (f, r) xvhere f: M P" is a full holomorphic map and t an integer 0 £ r ^ n. (D) We shall not present a full proof of the theorem, for which we refer the reader to [E-W3]; but will sketch the most important points in § 4 and § 5.
172 The existence and construction of certain harmonic maps
131
R E M A R K : I f M is compact it is easily seen that deg
r
(E) Applications. Combining the classification theorem with the theorems of § 2F asserting isotropy we have COROLLARY: between
The formula (3.2) defines a bijective correspondence
i) full harmonic maps
a
ii) [E-W3] full harmonic maps
r-1
Two further cases are given in [E-W3]. (F) Remarks, (i) The case (i) was essentially given by DinZakrzewski [D-Zl, D-Z2] and Glaser-Stora [G-S] and was discovered independently by D . Burns. We believe that some difficulties in the analysis in [G-S] are clarified by our approach [E-W3] especially in our formulation of the inverse transform g> ~> (/, r) using associated curves. (ii) Say that a full holomorphic map /: M P tropic if f£_ = /, i.e., in terms of local lifts /„ of / :
n
is totally iso-
1
0"TV, d'%>
c
= 0
for all «, 8 £ 0 , a + 13 g n - 1
c
where <, > is the symmetric inner product on C be even, say n = 2r, and formula (3.3) becomes (3-4)
n + 1
. Then n must
{f -^)-\-Tnx)Y r
from which it is clear that g> has image in the real projective space viewed as the subset of real points of P . We thus recover the classification theorem of Calabi [Ca]; see also [Ba, B-G, Ch]. B
(iii) The transformation (/, r) ~>
173 132
J . Eells and J . C. Wood
4. Sketch proof of the classification theorem, I : Harmonicity and isotropy of
J f ^ J e „ = {(V, W ) e f l ( 0 » ) x f f , ( C - « ) : r
V±W}
F
B
1
and the map n: K , , - * P defined by n(V, W) = (V + TP)- -- Note that n is a Riemannian submersion (c.f. [O'N]) and ip is harmonic (since ± holomorphic). Furthermore, the isotropy relations between / and g show that y> is horizontal with respect to si. I t is easy to see that the composition of two such maps is harmonic. r
(B) A certain covariant differential. I n order to prove isotropy of the manufactured harmonic map tp we introduce a covariant differential on a certain bundle as follows: n
Let L -> P be the canonical fine bundle whose fibre at » e P " is the line L„ determined by iv. L e t C denote the trivial bundle over P" with fibre C equipped with its standard Hermitian inner product and connection 3. Then L is canonically a eomplex subbundle of and so inherits a Hermitian inner product and connection; these structures may also be given to the orthogonal complement L of L in C " . We have an exact sequence of complex bundles over P": n + 1
n + 1
L
+ 1
0 -> L <-* C "
+1
-UL^-^Q
where j is given by orthogonal projection. Let q>: M -s- P" be a smooth map from a Riemann surface M. Tensoring the above exact sequence with the dual L* of L and pulling back via tp gives an exact sequence of bundles over M: (4.1)
l
0 -^tp->(L*®L)
1
x
-^tp-'L*®C'+ ^
-*Q
B + 1
where C now denotes the trivial bundle over M. Note that tp- (L* (g) L) is also trivial and that tp-*(L*(x) L -) is isometrically isomorphic to tp^T^P" with a connection preserving isomorphism. Let B denote the Hermitian connection and < , > the Hermitian inner product on £((jj £ C ) induced from those of L and C . Let 0 denote the canonical section of Zitp^B, C ) defined by
1
-1
B + 1
n + 1
f
B + 1
x)
174 Tbe existence and construction of certain harmonic maps
133
n + ,
C \ 0 of
+1
(4.2)
(D'7)(e) = f\V{ )) e
- <3'(0(°»t *<£?)> n e ) K * ( e ) , * (e)>
with a similar formula for the (1, 0) part D' (= D ). I n this fashion we may form iterated differentials of the universal lift of
?
y
n + 1
(4.3)
<[jy*0,
= 0
« ^ 0 , jS^O,a +
8^1, l
where we now use the covariant differential D on t{rp~ L, C
n + 1
).
(C) Isotropy of q> obtained from (/, r). Let
n
n + 1
+1
n + 1
+ 1
To show that
r
1
L
t
1
r
r-1
p
r - 1
175 134
J . Eells and J . C . Wood a
x
Similarly, D' 0(x) has values in g,_i(x) = j {x) for all XEM. Since f _x(x), g._,(x) and tp(x) are mutually perpendicular by the definition of
T
5. Sketch proof of the classification theorem, I I : The inverse transform cp -~> (/, r). B
(A) Associated curves of
+1
B
spanned by D" &[x),
8= 1, 2,...)
MM
and s = max dim (subspace of C
n + 1
spanned by D'"&{x}, a =
l,2,...).
Isotropy of a> implies that r - f - g g n ; fullness implies this is an equality. Define the a-th (reduced) D'-associated curve of
(5.2)
yi(x) =
B'0(x)A...AD"(I>{x),
provided this multivector is non-zero. This is clearly independent of the local complex coordinate used. To define
1
A
l
x
A
A
a
k
0
t
J
B
a
a
+1
B+1
0
v
176 The existence and construction of certain harmonic maps
135
vector (5.2); equivalently, for all x e M,
the two subspaces being on tp. We may define m" using I?"-derivatives. I t -> t? (C ) equal to zero
orthogonal by the isotropy conditions (4.3) (a = 1, r) and
(B) Formula for f. P ~ M / , r ) of (3.2).
We can now define the inverse transform
a
n+1
0
tt
u
PROPOSITION: Let tp be a full isotropic harmonic map. by (5.1) above and set s — n—r. Define f: M -*• P" by (5.3)
nte) = (^.imm^m^
=
ft-iW
Define r
« $ N •
Tfteji / is holomorphic and full; and (5.3) is (fte inverse transformation of (3.2). This proposition completes the proof of the classification theorem; we shall prove here only the statement that / is holomorphic: Firstly, it is clear that the subbundle of C corresponding to f, is spanned almost everywhere by the values of
D'(s)
e
e(^*„ ) x
for all seCicp^,)
; i.e.,
is .S'-closed .
It follows easily that the orthogonal complement of ^ _! in f^-i n n tp,, is 5"-closed in ip,; but since
r
REMARKS:
(i) The formula for the polar g of / is similar to (5.2)
viz: 1
g(x) = ( ^ - ^ © y v V ) ) - - =
•
(ii) If r == 0,
177
136
J Bells and J . C . Wood
13. Ou spaces of maps. (A) Let M be a compact Riemann surface of genus p . Tbe space (with G™ uniform topology) C(M, P ) of smooth maps J f - j - P " has components classified by their degree. Letting Hoi (M, P ) and Harm (M, P™) denote the indicated spaces of ± holomorphic and harmonic maps and using a subscript 7c to indicate subspaces of maps of degree 7c, we have n
n
Hoi, (Jf, P")
Harm, (M, P») ** C (M, P"). b
Taking n = co, a theorem of Segal [Se] asserts that Hoi* {M, P") is a homology deformation retract of C„{M, P"). Afore precisely, H^CtJtf, P-),Hol (-M, P«)) = 0 t
for
2p){2n — 1).
(B) How Ml G„(M, P") - * R ( S 0) has Harm, (Jf, P") as its set of critical points; it would be interesting to interpret Segal's theorem from the viewpoint of Morse theory. Segal records a version of that question, due to Atiyah (see also [Gu]). We can show that if
a
Testo pervenuto il 9 luglio 1981. Bozze licenziate il 26 gennaio 1982.
178 The existence and construction of certain harmonic maps
137
REFERENCES
[ A - H - S ] M. F . A T I Y A H
[Ba] [Bo] [B-G] [Ca] [Ch]
[D-Zl] [D-Z2]
[D-Z3]
[E-Ll] [E-L2] [E-S] [E-Wl] [E-W2]
[E-W3]
[FuJ [G-S] [Gu] [Ham] [Ha] [He] [Ko]
- N. J . H I T C H I N
- I . M . S I N Q E R , Self-duality
in
four-dimen-
sional Riemannian geometry, Proc. R o y a l Soc. London, A 362 (1978), 425-461. J . B A R B O S A , On minimal immersions of S into S , Trans. Amer. Math. S o c , 210 (1975|, 75-106. A . B O B E L , Lea fonctions automarphes de plusieurs variables complexes. B u l l . Soe. Math. Franca, 80 (1952), 167-182. H . J .BOUCHERS W . D . G A B B E R , Local theory of solutions for the 0(2k + 1) a-model. Comm. Math. P h y s . , 72 (1980), 77-102. E . C A L A B I , Quelques applications de I'analyse complete aux surfaces d'aire minima. Topics in Complex Manifolds, Univ. Montreal (1967), 59-81. S . S. C H E R N , On the minimal immersions of the two-sphere in a space of constant curvature. Problems in Analysis, Princeton University Press (1970), 27-40. A. M. Dnr W . J . Z A E B Z E W S K I , General classical solutions in the C P " model, Nucl. Phys., B 174 (1980), 397-406. A . M. D I N W . J . Z A K E Z E W S K I , Properties of the general classical C P " model, Phys. L e t t . , 95 B (1980), 419-422. A . M. D I N - W . J . Z A S R Z E W S K I , Classical Solutions in Orassmannian o-models (preprint). J .EELLS L . L E M A I R E , A report on harmonic maps. B u l l . London Math. S o c , 10 (1978), 1-68. J . EELLS L . L E M A I R E , On the construction of harmonic and holomorphic maps between surfaces. Math. A n n . , 252 (1980), 27-52. J . EELLS J . H . S A M P S O N , Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, Amer. J. Math., 86 (1964), 109-160. J . E E L L S - J . C . W O O D , Restrictions on harmonic maps of surfaces, Topology, 16 (1976), 263-266. J . E E L L S - J . C . W O O D , Maps of minimum energy, J . London Math. S o c , 23 (1981), 303-310. J . EELLS J . C . W O O D , Harmonic maps from surfaces to complex projective spaces, preprint. A . F O T A H J , Nonexistence of minimising harmonic maps from 2-spheres, Proc. Japan Aoad., 56 (1980), 291-293. V. GLASER R . S T O R A , Regular solutions of the GP" models and further generalizations (preprint, 1980). M. G U E S T , Some relations between homotopy theory and differential geometry. Thesis, University of Oxford (in preparation). R . S. H A M I L T O N , Harmonic maps of manifolds with boundary. Springer Lecture Notes no. 471, 1975. P . H A R T M A N , On homotopic harmonic maps, Canad. J . Math., 19 (1967), 673-687. S. H E L O A S O N , A duality for symmetric spaces with applications to group representations. A d v . M a t h . , ' 5 (W70), 1-154. J . L . K O S Z D L , Lectures on fibre bundles and differential geometry, T a t a Institute, 1960. 1
l
n
- 1
-
1
179 138 [Lei] [Le2] [Le3] [Li] [Ni] [O'N] [Ru]
[S-TJ] [S-Y]
[Se] [Si-Y] [Sil] [Si2] [Wol]
[Wol] [Wo2] [Wo3] [Wo4]
[Wo5] [Wo6] [Wo7] [Wu]
J . Eells and J . C . Wood L . L E M A I R E , Applications harmoniques de surfaces riemanniennes, J, Difl. Geom., 13 (1978), 61-78. L . L E M A I R E , Harmonic nnn-holomorphic maps from a surface to a sphere, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 71 (1978), 299-304. L . L E M A I R E , Boundary value problems for harmonic and minimal maps of surfaces into manifolds, A n n . Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa (to appear). A . L T C H N E R O W I C Z , Applications harmoniques et variet&s kahleriennes, Symp. Math. I l l Bologna (1970), 341-402. S . N I S H T K A W A , On holomorphic equivalence of bounded domains in complete Kahier manifolds of negative curvature, preprint. B . O ' N E I L L , The fundamental equations of a submersion, Mich. Math. J . , 13 (1966), 459-470. H . R U N D , Variational problems and Bdchlund transformations associated with the sine-Gordon and Korteweg-de Fries equations and their extensions. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 516 (1976), 119-226. J . SACKS K . U R L E N R E C K , The existence of minimal immersions of the twosphere. B u l l . Amer. Math. S o c , 83 (1977), 1033-1036. R. SCHOEN S . T . Y A U , Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three dimensional manifolds with nonnegative scalar curvature, A n n . of Math., 110 (1979), 127-142. G . B . S E O A L . The topology of spaces of rational functions. A c t a Math., 143 (1979), 39-72. Y . - T . S i u - S . - T . Y A U , Compact Kahier manifolds of positive bisectional curvature. Invent. Math., 59 (1980), 189-204. Y . - T . S i u , Some remarks on the complex analyticity of harmonic maps. Southeast Asian B u l l . Math., 3 (1979), 240-263. Y . - T . S i u , The complex-analyticity of harmonic maps and the strong rigidity of compact Kahier manifolds, A n n . of Math., 112 (1980), 73-111. J . A . W O L E , The action of a real semisimple group on a complex flag manifold, I ; Orbit structure and holomorphic arc components. B u l l . Amer. Math. S o c , 75 (1969), 1121-1237. J . C . W O O D , Harmonic maps and complex analysis, Proc. Summer Course in Complex Analysis, Trieste (1976), vol. I l l , 289-308. J . C . W O O D , A note on the fundamental group of a manifold of negative curvature. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. S o c , 83 (1978), 415-417. J . C . W O O D , Holomorphicity of certain harmonic maps from a surface to complex projective n-space, J . London Math. S o c , 20 (1979), 137-142. J . C . W O O D , On the holomorphicity of harmonic maps from a surface. Global Differential Geometry and Global Analysis, Proceedings, Berlin 1979, Springer Lecture Notes no. 838 (1981). J . C . W O O D , Confarmality and holomorphicity of certain harmonic maps, preprint. J . C . W O O D , Non-existence of solutions to certain Dirichlet problems for harmonic maps, preprint. J . C . W O O D , An extension theorem for holomorphic mappings. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. S o c , 98 (1980), 125-127. H . H . W u , The equidistribution tkeory of liolomorphic curves, A n n . of Math. Studies, 64 (1970).
180 Reprinted from ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICS All Rights Reserved by Academic Press, New York and London
Vol. 49. No. 3 September I9B3 Primed in /1< Igivm h
Harmonic Maps from Surfaces to Complex Projective Spaces J . E E L L S AND J . C . W O O D Mathematics Institute, University af Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, England and School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, England D E D I C A T E D TO PROFESSOR J. H. SAMPSON
Contents. I. Introduction. 2. Preliminaries. 3. Manufacturing harmonic maps from holomorphic maps. 4. A certain covariant differential. 5. Isotropy and other properties. 6. Manufacturing holomorphic maps from harmonic maps. 7. Cases where the isotropy relations hold, 8. Examples and remarks, 9. An estimate for the Morse index,
1. INTRODUCTION
In 117] the authors showed that any harmonic map from a compact Riemann surface M of genus p to the sphere M„ is holomorphic, provided its degree is greater than or equal to p. This gave the first indications of a possible classification theorem for certain harmonic maps in terms of holomorphic maps; it also showed that there exists no harmonic map of degree one from the torus M to the sphere M , whatever Riemannian metrics they may be given. p
i
n
It was clear from the outset that our methods (especially, an analysis of holomorphic quadratic differentials on M ) required that the domain be two dimensional. On the other hand, it was less obvious whether our theorem required the range to be two dimensional. In the present paper we shall replace the sphere M„ = C P by the complex projective H-space C P " with its Fubini-study metric; and show in particular if n > 2: p
1
(1) There exist nonhalomorphic harmonic maps from Af„ to C P " of all degrees greater than p (Theorem 8.10). (2) There exist nonholomorphic harmonic maps of M of all degrees >0.
a
and M, to C P "
These (nonholomorphic) maps are never minima of the energy functional, by a theorem of [18]. Other conditions which ensure that a harmonic map from M to C P " is holomorphic are given in [48-50, 58, 59]. p
217 Copyright © 1983 by Academic Press. Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
218
E E L L S AND WOOD
The source of these results is the Classification Theorem 6.9, which can be described roughly as follows: Let Af be a Riemann surface, not necessarily compact. A full map of Af into C P " is one whose image lies in no proper projective subspace. (Complex) isotropy of such a map is an orthogonality relation between its (1,0) and (0, 1) covariant differentials. Then we have T H E O R E M 6.9. There is a bijective correspondence between full isotropic harmonic maps 0 : A / - . C P " and pairs (f,r), where f:M-* C P " is a full holomorphic map and r is an integer (0 < r < n). If M is compact, the degree of $ is given in terms of the degree of f and its associated curves. We also give estimates for the Morse index of <j>. Recall that a weakly conformal map of a Riemann surface is harmonic if and only if it is a minimal branched immersion. An isotropic map is always weakly conformal, so Theorem 6.9 classifies isotropic minimal branched immersions of M in C P " . The isotropy condition is satisfied for an arbitrary harmonic map ^ A / p - C P " if
(i) (ii)
^ = 0 [ I I , 12, 20], p = 1 and | degree <j> | ^ 0, or
(ih) n = 2, immersion.
|degree $ | > 2p — 1 and (J is
a
minimal branched
Theorem 6.9 gives a complete classification of harmonic maps in these cases. On the other hand, examples {Section 7E} show that the isotropy condition is not satisfied for all harmonic maps M ->CP" of degree
C O R O L L A R Y 6 . I I . There is a bijective correspondence between full isotropic harmonic maps i W - + R P ' and full totally isotropic holomorphic 2
P
maps i W ^ C P " .
There are no full isotropic harmonic maps M -»1RP" if n is odd. Calabi's theorem was taken up by Chern [9, 10] and Barbosa [2]; in particular, Barbosa proved a rigidity theorem, and gave examples of branched minimal immersions 0 : A / - * S ' with energy E($) = 4nk for every k ^ r(r + 1 )/2. Borchers and Garber [3] have recently rediscovered Calabi's theorem, and have presented a very detailed exposition. Calabi's theorem revives interest in the memoir of Boruvka [4]—especially concerning the maps M„-*S by harmonic homogeneous polynomials. p
2
o
2r
The case p = 0 of Theorem 6.9 was discussed—without full mathematical rigour—by Din and Zakrzewski [ I I , 12]; more precision and clarity (from
182 HARMONIC MAPS
219
our viewpoint) was added by Glaser and Stora [20]. That case was also found by D. Burns [62]. Our results (announced in [19], with proofs sketched) have grown from an attempt to understand [11, 12, 20]. In that effort we have been patiently guided by R. Stora—who has shed much light and joy. We are also much indebted to M. Ishida for lessons on constructing a certain elliptic curve (Section 8); and to K. Abe, M Guest, L . Lemaire, M. Murray, M. S. Narasimhan, and J. H. Rawnsley for adjustments and other stimulating conversations. During the preparation of this paper we enjoyed the hospitality of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, the Technical University of Denmark, and the University of Bonn. Dr. Wood was supported by the Sonderforschungsbereich "Theoretische Mathematik," Universitat Bonn. In Sections 3-6 we give a full proof of the Classification Theorem 6.9. First of all, in Section 3 we present a method (with fairly wide applicability) of constructing harmonic maps from holomorphic maps / In Section 4 we develop the properties or an important covariant differential, in terms of which we establish (Section 5) the fullness and isotropy of ty. In Section 6 we make the inverse construction, to produce the required bijectivity of Theorem 6.9. In Section 7 we find conditions to ensure that certain harmonic maps are isotropic; and in Section 8 specific examples are given. Finally, in Section 9 we use the Riemann-Roch theorem in conjunction with the second variation formula for harmonic maps to produce lower bounds on the indices of certain harmonic maps. 1
2.
PRELIMINARIES
A +
l
0
We let C = \v = (i> ,..., v"): u'G C | denote complex (n + 1 )-space equipped with its standard symmetric C-bilinear inner product { ) : c
c
(v, w) =
V o'w',
i=0 and associated Hermitian inner product H {v, w) = V ' ' = (o, v
w
C
W) , +
where w=(w',...,w") is the conjugate of w G C ' - As usual, we write | ti| = \f{v, v). Two subspaces V, W of C* are orthogonal if (v, w) = 0 for all v e V, w £ W; we write V1 W. 1
183 220
E E L L S AND WOOD
Et
Let £ be a complex vector bundle over a complex manifold M. Let ^(E) (resp. W^E) denote the space of smooth (= C°) sections a of E defined on M (resp. on an open subset U of M). TM denotes the tangent bundle of M, and TM = TM ® C its complexification. A Hermitian connected structure on E consists of (i) a smooth Hermitian inner product { , ) = { , ) on the fibres of £ , and (ii) a smooth connection E
E
D = D : &(TM)
X
-4 &(E),
-
denoted (Co )->D o, such that {
Si{a,p) = (D a,p) (
+ (a, D p) T
for all ( 7 , p G ? ( £ ) , C.e&iTM). This identity is often used to "shift" the covariant derivative from one factor to another. The bundle E so endowed will be called a Hermitian connected bundle. Decomposition of TM according to types TM = TM ® T'M induces a decomposition of D into (1,0)- and (0, 1 )-parts, by restricting % to T'M and T"M, respectively. If £ is a holomorphic vector bundle, we say that a (smooth) connection on E is compatible with the holomorphic structure if the (0, l)-part of D coincides with the d-operator of E\ thus o G ^ c ) is holomorphic iff D o = 0 for all ( 6 T"M. There is a unique such metric connection on any holomorphic vector bundle E with Hermitian metric—called the Hermitian connection of E. The Hermitian connection on a trivial bundle = MX is denoted by & j that notation is appropriate, in view of the canonical identification of the fibres of Q with C". L
1
t
N
A complex subbundle F of a Hermitian connected bundle E inherits a Hermitian inner product and Hermitian connection n%: f r „ ( / o - %{E)
A
%(E)
-
K(n
where C € W^TM); here the first map is induced by the inclusion FczE, and the third map is induced from orthogonal projection. More generally, if $:M-*N is a smooth map and E-> N is Hermitian connected, then there is a canonically defined Hermitian connected structure on the pull-back $-'E->M. Note that the holomorphic tangent bundle T'M of a Hermitian manifold M has a canonically defined Hermitian connected structure.
184 HARMONIC MAPS
221
C. Bundles over Riemann Surfaces Let M be a Riemann surface; i.e., a one-dimensional complex manifold. By a chart U = (U, z) of M we mean a nonempty open set U of M equipped with a complex coordinate z:U-*C, written x\—*z(x). It is convenient to represent the (1,0)- and (0, l)-parts of a connection D o n a complex bundle over M by D' = D with £ = djdz G & {T'M\ and Z>" = D with l^djdzE %(T"M). Write D' for D <-•-•• D ' (fc times) and set D' = identity map; similarly for D" We use similar notation for d, with d' = 8/8z, 8" = djdz. By a result of Koszul-Malgrange [33], (and |S8| to derive the equation dX/dz = X • p\ the reduction to log X in [58] is wrong, as noted by Professor M. F. Atiyah), if £ is a Hermitian connected bundle with connection D over a Riemann surface, there is a unique holomorphic structure on E compatible with D. Then £ is a Hermitian holomorphic bundle: and o 6 ^ ( £ ) is holomorphic iff D"o = 0. t
V
k
r
1
a
Let £ be a Hermitian connected bundle with connection D. A subbundle F is D"-ciosed if, on all charts U, D"(%{F)) c ^ ( £ ) ; similarly for the notion of F being D'-closed. The orthogonal complement of a D'-closed bundle is D"-closed. If £ is a Hermitian holomorphic bundle, a D"-closed subbundle of £ is just a holomorphic subbundle. For 0 < t < n + 1 there is a bijection between smooth maps a: A/-> G , ( C ' ) and smooth subbundles of rank t of C over M given by setting the fibre of the subbundle at x 6 M equal to a(x). We shall often use the same letter to denote the subbundle. It is easy to see that the subbundle is 8' (resp. d") closed iff a is antiholomorphic (resp. holomorphic). +
B + 1
D. Harmonic Maps [14, 16, 57] 0 0
A smooth (= C ) map M-* N between smooth Riemannian manifolds is harmonic if it is a critical point for the Dirichlet or energy integral E(
y
D
M
M
r($l) = Trace Dd<j> (r is the Euler-Lagrange operator of the energy integral £ ) vanishes identically. Here D is the connection on the bundle
185 222
E E L L S AND WOOD e
decompose the C-linear extension dip: TM-> TN into four maps dfi
d #: T M -»TN
T'M -* T'N,
of
&r- T"M -»
d$=d
its
differential
TN,
dj = ty: T"M -» T"N.
Then the energy density e(^){x) = \ \d$(x)\ of at xE M decomposes into the sum of the (1,0)- and (0, l)-energy densities 2
A
where e'(<j>)(x) = \d
E'tf, D)
3
- f |£W*)|
E*y, D) =
v (x), M
[ mxf
vjx)
are called the (1,0)- and (0, \)-energy integrals of $ (over D). $ is holomorphic iff 0$ = 0, and antiholomorphic iff 8$ = 0. We express these alternatives by saying that
M
M
v
manifolds
(i) (ii)
and if M is compact,
E'(^) — E"(^>) depends a ± holomorphic
map of minimum (iii)
then
energy
# is harmonic
map
[38] only on the homotopy
between
in its homotopy
Kahier
class
manifolds
of is a
§\ harmonic
class.
iff $ is a critical
point
of E' iff $ is a critical
point
ofE". E. Harmonic
Maps from
a Riemann
Surface
A smooth map fr.M^N from a Riemannian 2-manifold M has energy depending only on the conformal class of the metric of M. Thus we can speak of harmonic maps whose domain is a Riemann surface. In a chart (£/,z) of M the partial differentials d$,d
i
ll
D"8'$ = 0, where D is the connection on (j>~ T'N. A smooth map 0: M-*N is said to be weakly conformal if there exists a smooth function A:M-> [0, co) such that \d(x)(X)\=X(x)\X\ for all X€T M. By definition, a branched minimal immersion is a weakly conformal harmonic map. Such a map is a branched l
X
H A R M O N I C
223
MAPS
immersion in the sense of [24, 25]. For a weakly conformal map the area A(^) of the map is equal to the energy £((*).
$:M-*N
F . Riemannian Submersions A Riemannian submersion [43] is a smooth map n: Y-*N of Riemannian manifolds such that for all y€ Y, the differential dn(y): T Y-* T N maps the subspace T"Y of tangent vectors orthogonal to the fibre K~ {n(yi)\ isometrically onto T„ N. The space T"Y is called the horizontal subspace at y, and the space of tangent vectors along the fibres (= Ker dn(y)) is called the vertical subspace. y
n
l
ly)
The Fubini-Study metric on complex projective n-space C P " is characterized by the fact that the Hopf map n: S **' ->CP" (obtained by restricting the standard projection n: C " '\0 -> C P " ) is a Riemannian submersion; the value of the constant holomorphic sectional curvature on C P " is then c = 4. (Wherever the value of c matters (in fact only in Proposition 7.1) we shall leave it as c.) Real projective n-space R P " may be considered as the subset of real points of C P " ; its induced metric has constant Riemannian sectional curvature 1. We let G , ( C " ' ) (0 < t< n -f 1) denote the Grassmannian of r-planes (= r-dimensional complex subspaces) equipped with its standard metric [32]; we have an antiholomorphic isometry 2
+
+
If Y and /V are Hermitian manifolds and n: Y^>N is a holomorphic Riemannian submersion, then the horizontal space is closed under the almost complex structure •/ of Y. Then 8n:T'Y->T'N restricts to a C-linear isomorphism between the (1,0) horizontal tangent space T'"Y = (T" Y®C)nT'Y and TN. A similar statement hoids if n is antiholomorphic. y
G. Tangent Space to a Grassmannian +
It is well known that for any V€ G,(C '), the holomorphic tangent space 7"^G,(C" ) may be identified with V* ® V = Sf(V, V ) via a complex linear isometry h: T | , G , ( C " ) y(V, V ). For our purposes we may describe h as follows: Let w G T' G,{C +') and let v G V. If v =0, set h(w)(v) = 0. Otherwise, let
1
+ 1
x
L
V
+ 1
+
In the case of complex projective space C P " = G , ( C additional information: Let A:L = ( C
+
l
\0)x -C-.CP c
n
+ 1
) we shall need
187 224
E E L L S AND WOOD
be the holomorphic line bundle associated to the principal C*-bundle j r : C \ 0 - » C P ' ' defining CP": the fibre L over any y G C P " can be identified with the linear subspace of C determined by y; thus L is identified as a holomorphic subbundle of the trivial bundle C over C P " . Let k :L -» C P " be that subbundle of C " ' whose fibre at y is the orthogonal complement of L in C . Note that L is not a holomorphic subbundle of C ; instead we give it a holomorphic structure via the isomorphism: Z , ~ C / L - We endow both bundles L and L with the Hermitian metrics and metric connections induced from C " ; it is easy to see that L and L are Hermitian holomorphic bundles. We give L* © L the tensor Hermitian holomorphic structure. Define h: T'CP" -> L* ®L on each fibre as above. Then h is a connection preserving biholomorphic isometric isomorphism of these Hermitian holomorphic bundles. To see that h is holomorphic, note that we may choose holomorphic and w and v as holomorphic sections of T'CP" and L. From its formula, it is easy to check that h(w)(v) is a holomorphic section of V . That h is connection preserving now follows from the uniqueness of the Hermitian connection. , +
1
y
+
1
N
y
l
+
1
+
+
1
L
y
N + 1
i
+ 1
l
+ 1
1
1
l
1
H. Local Lifts Let f:M-* C P " be a smooth map from a Riemann surface to complex projective n-space. We say / is full if its image lies in no proper projective subspace of C P " . By a lift off on an open set U ofM (or simply a local lift) we mean a smooth map f : U-> C \ 0 such that n <>/(,=/ on U, where J T : C " \ 0 - » C P " is the standard projection; if / is holomorphic (resp. antiholomorphic), then it has holomorphic (resp. antiholomorphic) lifts over small enough open sets. M
v
+ i
Throughout this paper: Whenever M is used without comment, it denotes a Riemann surface (without boundary), not necessarily compact. Whenever f , g , f are used, they denote a lift off, g, > over an open set UczM. v
v
w
3. M A N U F A C T U R I N G HARMONIC M A P S FROM HOLOMORPHIC M A P S
A. Associated Curves of a Holomorphic Map Let / : M-> C P " be a holomorphic map. We describe the construction of associated curves of / for later comparison with the harmonic case. See also (61]. For 0 < a < oo, the ath order (augmented) osculating space B (x) = 8JS)(x) off at xeM is defined by Sjx) = span|5%(jc): 0 < y < a), where f is any lift of / over an open set containing x; this is clearly independent of lift and chart. As x varies, the osculating spaces may vary in dimension; but note a
v
188 HARMONIC MAPS
3.1.
LEMMA
225
If f is full, then at some xEM,
dim S„(x) = n + 1.
Proof. Suppose not. Then for all x on some nonempty open set f/, one of the B'J^x) would be linearly dependent on \d'"f {x)\Q<.a< y\ (whatever local lift f is chosen). By differentiation, all higher derivatives would be linearly dependent on these derivatives, so that all jets off,; would be in a proper subspace of C " \ and hence by real analyticity,/ would lie in the same subspace contradicting fullness. I u
l
v
+
Remark 3.2. map.
The converse to Lemma 3.1 is trivially true for any smooth
Now set A = \xEM:d[m§ (x)
< n + 1}.
n
For any integer a ( 0 < a < n ) define f : M\4 -» G a
LEMMA
AND DEFINITION
holomorphic map f : M -* G curve of f. a
(3.1) ') by
tt+
3.3. There is a unique extension of f to a i ( C ' ) . This map is called the ath associated a
+
a +
Proof. Let xE M. Choose a chart U containing x and a holomorphic lift fu of / on U. Consider the map w: U-*A C (sometimes called the Wronsklan) defined by a
+ >
my =$m a
+ >
•••
a
Note that w is holomorphic and for x & A,f (x) = {a -f l)-plane defined by w(x). If r £ A, we can write w{x') = (z(x') - z(x)) W(x) for all x' in some open neighbourhood U' of x, where p is a positive integer and IV: U' -> ^ a + i^-fl+i j holomorphic and nowhere zero. Since W{x') is decomposable for all JC' ^ x, it remains decomposable for x' = x, and we can define f (x) as the (a + I J-dimensional subspace defined by W(x). From the formula for w we see that this is independent of choice of chart U and local lift / „ . Uniqueness of the extension is clear since M\A is dense in M. | a
B
s
a
Remark 3.4. (i) Note that f =f; G ( C ) equal to the zero map.
it is convenient to set
a
f_ :M^> l
+ 1
0
(ii) The associated curves g : M-> G ,(C*') of a full antiholomorphic map g : A / ^ C P " can be defined in the same way, replacing d' fv by 8" g , where g is an antiholomorphic lift of g over a chart U. Equivalently, g (x) = (g) {x). a
y
y
v
v
a
a
a +
189 226
E E L L S AND WOOD
B. Construction of Harmonic Maps into C P " The construction of harmonic maps is based on the following observation (cf. [5, Lemma 1.2.5]; see [66] for further results): L E M M A 3.5. Let M, Y, N be Riemannian manifolds, s.: Y-» N a R iemannian submersion and M -* Y a harmonic map. Suppose thai i// is horizontal with respect to n; i.e., for each x G M dvj(x) maps T M into the horizontal space of n. Then $ = x o if/: M -> N is harmonic. S
Proof. By the composition law [15], at each point » £ M the tension field of <j> is given by ^ ) = Vv /7r(^( ,.), lv(e )), £
e
£
/
where Vdn is the second fundamental form of the map n and \e,\ is an orthonormal basis for the tangent space T,M. By hypothesis, each vector d\u{ej) is horizontal and by [43] we see that Vdn(e', e') = 0 for any horizontal tangent vector e' £ TY. It follows that r(^) = 0. | Now let r, s be nonnegative integers (0 < r + s < n), and define +
+
sft^j = {(V, W) jg G , ( C " ' ) X G ( C " ' ) : V 1 W\. S
Setting ( = (n + 1) - (r + s), we have the representation of JT as a flag manifold: the homogeneous space (U(r) denotes the unitary group) rs
JT = U(n+\ )/l/(r) X U{s) X U(t). m
If s — n — r, we have a Riemannian submersion n:^ _ -* C P " = U(n+ l)/U(n)xU(\) given by including U(r) X U(s) in U{n) in the standard way. Geometrically, x(V, W) = (V+ W)\' r
s
D E F I N I T I O N 3.6. Let f:M-*CP" be a full holomorphic map from a Riemann surface. We call g =f _ :M-> C P " the polar off. x
l
Note the following characterisation of polars in terms of local lifts:
LEMMA
3.7.
Let f:M-*
C P " be a holomorphic map.
1
+
We give £ £ the submanifold metric induced from G ( C " ' ) X G , ( C * ' ) . This is not the same as the standard homogeneous space metric, however the map n is a Riemannian submersion for either of these metrics. 4
r
190 HARMONIC MAPS
(i)
227
If f is full, its polar g is antiholomorphic and full. For any local
lifts n
0
for
al!
a,ff>+#<*~h
(d f {x),d" {x))±0 ,a
a
v
for all a,B^0,a
forsome
gll
(3-2)
x€M
(3.3)
+ B = n.
(n) Conversely, if g:M-> C P " is a smooth map satisfying (3.2) and (3.3) for some a, 8^0, a + B = n, then f and g are full and g is the polar off By analogy with (3.8) below we call (3.2) the isotropy relations between/ and g. Proof, (i) For B = 0 the first equation (3.2) is immediate. Since/is full, 8'%(x) does not lie i n / „ _ , ( * ) for xeM\4; hence (3.3) follows for B = 0. For other a and ft (3.2) and (3.3) follow by shifting d'. Antiholomorphicity of g is clear from its definition. To see that g is full, suppose that X^g^x) + ••• + X„d" g (x) = 0 at some point xEM where (3.3) holds. Taking inner products successively with/„(.>(), S'f^x),..., B'*f (x) shows that A„ = ••• = X = 0. By the converse of Lemma 3.1, g is full. The proof of (ii) follows similar reasoning. a
v
u
0
Remark 3.8. points x, where
(i)
This proof shows that if g is the polar of/, the sets of
dim spanja'Y^jc)} < n + 1
fl
and
dim span{,?" gir(*)l < n + 1
are the same; namely, the set A of (3.1). (ii) So
f
For
full
maps fg: Af — CP",
Eq. (3.2)
is
equivalent
to
n-I-a'
Now let / : A f - * C P " be a full holomorphic map and let r be an integer (0 < r < n). Let g be the polar off, and set s = n — r. Then we may define a map m M-^Mii y K * ) = Wr*»b
LEMMA 3.9.
The map v is horizontal with respect to n i ^ - t C P * . +
Proof. It is sufficient to prove that V: A / - » * « = - * G (C" ') X G,(C" ) is horizontal with respect to 77: t/-» CP", where 17= {(K, IV) £ G ( C ) x G ( C " ):dim(P'+ H 0 = " ! 77(K, HO = ( ^ + ^ O this it suffices to show that > and 3'V S 7"T/ are horizontal; we treat 5 > . Set (V, IV) =
+ I
n + l
r
+ l
a
!
r
s
n
d
1
T
o
d
o
228
E E L L S AND WOOD
d
'¥(x) = {d'f _ (x),0). We may identify the vertical subspace of T' „ U with T G (V® W)cz T' G (C *')^ ¥{V, V -) as in Section 2 G . Let f (resp. ) be a holomorphic (resp. antiholomorphic) lift of / (resp. g) on some neighbourhood of x. Define A czM as in (3.1); suppose that x€A. Then by Remark 3.8 {d'-f^x): 0 < a < r - 1| and \8" g {x):{i^B ^s - 1| are linearly independent. The first set of vectors spans V. Since d'd"-%{x) = d'%(x)e V for all i
l
(v
n
y
r
v
t
s
r
v
g u
&
v
+
v
7
x
r
1
r
1
l
1
r
x
&
v
PROPOSITION 3.10. Let f:M-*CP" be a full holomorphic map from Riemann surface and r an integer (0 ^ r < n). Define
^(.)=/ _,(,) n/ W; r
r
a
(3.4)
or equivalently t(x)={f _ {x)®g _ (x))\ r
1
s
(3.5)
1
where g is the polar of f and s = n — r. Then $ is harmonic.
Further properties of
r
i
s
Remark 3.11. (i) If r = 0, then $=f fli =g is antiholomorphic.
is holomorphic; if r = n, then
(ii) We may think of (f,r)-~0' as a type of Backlund transform [44]. It also has many of the features of a Radon transform between symmetric spaces [ 2 6 ] ; and, for n = 2, r= I , it is a form of Penrose's transform [1 ]. (iii)
Note two further equivalent formulae for 0,
m^-M^^sMh *(x)=fM)n (x). gs
(3.6) (3.7)
192
HARMONIC MAPS
229
C. Calabi's Construction as a Special Case To construct harmonic maps from a Riemann surface M to a real projective space IRP", let i: UP -*CP" denote the inclusion map onto the real points of CP". Then because /' is totally geodesic, n<=
LEMMA 3.12. is harmonic.
A smooth map (j: M -» RP" is harmonic iff i ° <j>: M'•-* CP"
Let / : M -* CP" be a full holomorphic map. DEFINITION 3.13. Say that / is totally isotropic if f and f are orthogonal for all a, 8^0, a + B^n — 1; in terms of a local hoiomorphic lift/* o f / a
,a
(3 f ,d'%)
c
v
=0
forall
a
a,/f> 0, a + B < n - 1.
(3.8)
It is easy to see that / is totally isotropic iff the polar of / is f. LEMMA 3.14. If n is odd, there are no full totally isotropic holomorphic maps f.M-> CP". Proof. Set H = 2 r + i . Then (3.8) holds for a = B = r. By d'differentiation of this inner product we see that (3.8) also holds for a = r+ t, B = r. But that means / , ,(*) Lf { ) for all x G A f , which is impossible for dimension reasons. I x
+
r
We now recover Calabi's construction [2, 5, 6, 9, 10]. I r
PROPOSITION 3.15. Let / : A / - > C P ( r > I) be a full totally isotropic holomorphic map. Define ip-.M-* R P dy i r
L
m=(fr- (x)+f -M) l
Then
A
(3-9)
r
is harmonic. I r
Proof. The form of (3.9) shows that ^ has image in R P ; by Proposition 3.10, f o M-* C P is harmonic; by Lemma 3.12, 0: M— R P is therefore harmonic. ! r
! r
+
l
Remark 3.16. Say that an r-dimensional subspace V of C (/•<(« + I)/2) is totally isotropic if {v, u ) = 0 for all u € V; equivalently, {v, w) = 0 for all v, iv £ K Thus V is totally isotropic if and only if it is c
c
193 230
E E L L S AND WOOD
orthogonal to its conjugate V. The space ^ of all totally isotropic subspaces of C may be regarded as a subspace of a#^ via the inclusion mapping V —+(V,V); and restricting the Riemannian submersion s : J ^ , - > C P produces a Riemannian submersion Tt-.^-f R P given by n(V) = (V© V) . In terms of homogeneous spaces, ^ = SO(2r + I )/i/(r) = SO(2r + 2)/U(r + 1) and TT: SO(2r + l)/t/(r) - 0(2r + l)/0(2r) X 0(1) R P is induced by the standard inclusions U(r) <=-> 0(2r) <=-• 0(2r) x 0(1). 2 r + I
r
e
! r
3 r
1
I r
2 r
If/:A/-fCP is a totally isotropic map, then the subspaces f -,(x) (x € M) are totally isotropic, and so we have a map/,_,:Af -*<^. The map (*:A/->RP given by (3.9) is then the composition 7i«f _,. It is easily deduced from Lemma 3.9 that/ _, is horizontal with respect to TT, confirming that ij> is harmonic. To construct isotropic harmonic maps ^ : A / - > 5 , we replace the above fibration n by r
2r
r
r
2r
S0(2r + I)/SO(2r) =
+ l)/[/(r)
n:S0(2r
SK
Its fibre is ,, as can easily be verified. We can describe n as follows: For KG choose an oriented orthonormal base (e,) of R ' such that V is spanned by {e, + ie e _, + ie }; then JI(^) = e , . J
2
D. Generalizations
2r
2r
and Alternative
+ I
2 f +
Formulation
of the
Construction
PROPOSITION 3.17. Let f (resp. g): M-> C P " be a full holomorphic (resp. antiholomorphic) map. Suppose that (fg) satisfies the partial isotropy relations f 1 g for all a+B^n-t, where t is an integer (/>1). Set s-n—T. Then the map :M-> G,(C ') defined by a
a
A
m is
+
=
Vr-,(x)®S:- (x))
1
l
harmonic.
For M the Euclidean sphere this interprets an example of [13] in our framework. Note that g is not uniquely determined b y / when t> I. Harmonicity is established by regarding tj> as the composition of ( / , _ , , g _ , ) : A / - » ^ _ and the Riemannian submersion af£_ ,-» G,(C ') given by (V, W)-> s
( i J
+
ti
(V+
1
IV) .
E The construction can be generalized to give all harmonic maps from a Riemann surface into a Grassmannian which are isotropic in a certain sense, and some harmonic maps into flag manifolds, see [65] for details.
194
H A R M O N I C
MAPS
231
Remark 3.18. (i) Professor M. F. Atiyah has called our attention to [22,46], where certain holomorphic horizontal (locally liftable) maps play a key role—especially in connection with Griffiths' period mapping. (ii) Another situation where horizontality plays a role appears in Ishihara [29]: Let i: S ->¥i ' be the standard embedding, and suppose that M -* S is an isometric immersion. We have Obata's Gauss map [42] m+P
m
m+p+
m+I>
m
gj
:Af ->0(m+p
+ l)/0(m+
l)xO(p).
x
Ishihara shows that g is harmonic iff is minimal. If, more generally, ^ has constant mean curvature, g lifts to a harmonic map }
}
g:A/™ -» 0(m + /> + l)/0(m)
X O(p) X 0(1),
which is horizontal with respect to the Riemannian submersion 7!,:0(m +p+l)/0(m)xO(p)XO{l)->0(m+p+
l)/0(m) X 0(p
+ 1).
We conclude from Lemma 3.5 that the Gauss map of i o (I, g, = ffi, o. g: M -* Oim +p + 1 )/0(m) X 0(p + 1) m
is harmonic {theorem of Ruh-Vilms). Ishihara constructions to include immersions in any space form.
4. A C E R T A I N COVARIANT
generalises
these
DIFFERENTIAL
In our study of a map 0: M -• CP" we must consider its derivatives of all orders. Rather than working with the derivatives d""^ of local lifts, it is more convenient to interpret 0 as a global section of a certain bundle and to take its covariant derivatives with respect to a suitable connection. Here are the details: u
A.
The Covariant
Differential
Consider the exact sequence of vector bundles over C P " O ^ L ^ C ^ ' ^ L
1
— ' 0 ,
where j is given by orthogonal projection along L (see Section 2G). On
195 232
E E L L S AND
WOOD
tensoring with L * the sequence remains exact. Pulling back via a map j*: M •# CP" gives the exact sequence over M 0-$-\L*
®L)-!-+
®C"
+ l
|
i
)^. S- {L*®Z, )-.0.
(4.1)
(
l
Note that the bundle $~ (L*®L) is a trivial line bundle, having the "constant" section M -* M X C given by x -* (x, 1), which we denote simply by I. D E F I N I T I O N 4.1.
Remark
4.2.
The
(i)
inclusion map of L a line in C * ' .
universal
For
any
lift
JCEM,
o
is
the
section
+
C" ')
U)
i(l)e
is
the
4
E
U
I
into C" "'; the image of
(ii) An arbitrary local lift ij> : ( 7 - t C \0 of 0 can be written in the form 3>(p), where p is a section of <ji~'L over Z/; for any such p, &(p) is a local lift. This justifies our name universal lift for 0. v
(iii) sequence
Sequence (4.1) is the restriction to the zero section of the exact
where X is defined in Section 2G and A is the bundle along the fibres. l
1
We give the bundles ^ ~ L , $~'L* and ^ " ' Z . the pull-back Hermitian connected structures; H = (i^'L* © C " and $~'(L* © L ) = fl~'X,* © $~ L are endowed with their tensor product Hermitian connected structures. (We do not attempt to pull back the holomorphic structures, but rather use Section 2C to give these bundles holomorphic structures compatible with their connections, so that they become Hermitian holomorphic bundles. That holomorphic structure is not needed until Section 6.) Note that the connection preserving isometry h: T'CP" -> L * ® Z / pulls back to produce a connection preserving isometry (which we denote by the same letter) + 1
l
1
L
l
n
A: ^" r C P - » < * - ' ( £ • *
(4.2)
+ 1
The bundle H- #~'L* ® C " is used extensively in this paper. The notation D will always mean the connection on H unless otherwise stated. Note (by Section 2B) that the connection on (*"'(L* © Z . ) is given in terms of that on H as the composition 1
D,: V(4~ (Z. * © L-)) -1* W(H) - ? U 1
Mwy~%L*i$
where i and j are the pull-backs of the maps i and j of (4.1).
L%
(4.3)
233
HARMONIC MAPS
The connection D and Hermitian inner product { . ) on H have the following expressions: LEMMA 4.3.
(i)
For any x 6 M, V, W€
H, x
(V, W) = (V(p), lV(p))/(0{p),
where 0^p£ (^~ L) is arbitrary, the right-hand side inner product being thai on C " . In particular, ( 0 , 0 ) — 1. x
+ 1
(ii)
For any (.Eft(T'M),
V £ W(H), 0 # p £
(Z> V)(p) = 8 (V(p)) - {S0tf>% (
L
%% we have
#(p)> V(p)K
r/iH5 af each point of M, (iii) for D".
(D'V)(p) is a linear combination of d'(V(p)) and V(p). Similarly
Proof, (i) This is just the standard formula for the inner product on H induced from those on tj>~ L and C . 1
+
l
A
l
is
Calculating the last connection by regarding &\~'L as a subbundle of C quickly gives the formula.
B + I
(ii) The connection on H inherited from those of ~'L given by (D V)(p) = l
and C
+
lL
d (V(p))-V(Df- (p)). i
Remark 4.4. (i) We see from ( 4 . 3 ) that point x depends only on the values of £ and p must be true since D is a connection. From the see that for any smooth complex-valued neighbourhood in M,
the value of (D,V)(p) at a at that point. Of course, this second of these properties we function A defined on a
(D, V)(Xp) = k(D,V(p)); this property is called phase invariance of D. PROPOSITION 4.5. For any % £ W^TM) the local section D
l
L
1
T
,A
h(d ) = D'iP Proof.
Let x £ U and p€L ; x
and
h(d"<j>) = D"
we must show that D,
197 234
E E L L S AND WOOD
i.e., lies in (0 ' £ ) , . If p = 0 this is trivial; otherwise, extend p to be a smooth nowhere zero section of $ " 'L on U. Then by Lemma 4.3. o
£
*ip)
= 8Af»ip))
- iU$¥i%
*(P)/<*G>>. *(/>)>
= horizontal component of dA^&ip)). Now, since
Equation
PROPOSITION 4.6.
A smooth map §\ M - > C P " is harmonic if and only if
in any chart U, D"D'
some smooth function
Similarly,
(4.5)
)
u' on U. Moreover,
in this case p' =
2
\D'&\ .
is harmonic if and only if in any chart
(4.6)
D'D"
2
\D"
Proof. By Proposition 4.5, the isometry (4.2) gives h(8'$) = D'&. Since h is connection preserving, E
>
(D "d') =
L
D' -'"-'® ''"D'
F
A
where D is the connection on E = ~ T ' C P " . As remarked in Section 3A, 0 is harmonic if and only if (D )" d'$ = 0. This is true if and only if j{D"D'0) = O; by exactness of the sequence this holds if and only if (4.5) holds. Finally, if <j> is harmonic, E
0» \$f
= -
(D"D'0,
* ) 4-
(D'
By Proposition 4.5, (D'
p' = \D'0\ .
|
Remark. The harmonic equation (4.5) can also be derived as follows: Let 0, be a smooth 1-parameter variation of $* = *>„; and for each f let 4>,EW(
198 HARMONIC MAPS
235
Since D
The following lemmata will be useful later: LEMMA 4.7.
For any chart V and Ve^^"'/.* (D'D"
—D"D')V
® C
+
I
)
we have
= KV,
where K: U-> IR is given by K(x) = \D'
1
-\D"
X
Proof.
Choose a Hermitian metric on U. Then for any p t,
{(D'D" -D"D')
V\(p)=R (i,
l
E.W ($~ L) v
0 V)(p)
=
-V\R^\U)ip)\,
E
where C = 8jdz and R denotes the curvature tensor of a bundle E . Now it is well known that the curvature tensor of Z. is related to the fundamental form of C P " by R = ito ". Hence L
CP
CP
**-*•<& 0 = ¥*"> '(tO. Now from Section 2D CP
(oj",t*co ")
=
\d$\>~\dt\\
Computing these quantities in the chosen Hermitian metric quickly gives the stated formula. Remark. This result can also be proved by direct calculation, using formula (4.4) for D. LEMMA 4.8. chart U
Let $:M->£P"
be harmonic.
y
Then for any point x in a
Z>"(/>"*#)(*) has values in span \D' 4>(x):
0 < y< a - I|,
for any a > 1.
Proof.
For a ~ 1 this is Proposition 4.6. For a > 1 D"(Z)'
a
+ 1
A
0 ) = D'D"D' <J> - KD'"
and the lemma easily follows by induction. The same result holds with D" and D' derivatives interchanged.
199
236
E E L L S AND WOOD 5. ISOTROPY AND O T H E R PROPERTIES
The main aim of this section is to show that the harmonic maps 0: M — CP" constructed via Proposition 3.10 are full harmonic maps satisfying certain complex isotropy conditions reflecting conditions (3.2) between/and its polar. The bijection (Section 2) between smooth subbundles of C " and smooth maps M-> 6?,(C ) will be used extensively. + L
A.
+ I
Osculating Spaces of a Smooth Map
Let fi-.M-tCP" (Definition 4.1).
be a smooth map, and let
DEFINITION 5.1.
For any integer a (1 < a < oo) and x £ M, we define
(i) the ath order (reduced) D'-osculating space {of
(ii)
a
ath order
augmented D'-osculating
space (of # at x) as the
subspace 8' (x) = B'„(^)(x) = span &'*&{xf. 0 < y < a |. a
a
n
d
a r e
The ath reduced and augmented Z)"-osculating spaces 8* °? $ similarly defined. It is easy to see that the definitions are independent of chart used. For any integer a (1 < a < co) and x £ M, define the ath augmented d'osculating space of § at x as the subspace
span{5"^(x)0
The ath augmented d'-osculating space is equal to the ath
augmented D' -osculating space.
Proof By Lemma 4.3(h), for any p € S&(f>~ 'L), at all points of U we have
VE W ' L *
+
® C" ')
and
span( V(p), (D' V)(p) \ = span{V(p\ 3' V(p)}. The lemma is now proved by a simple induction argument. Remark spaces.
5.3.
I
There is no version of Lemma 5.2 for reduced osculating
Let q be an integer (0 < q < co) and x £ M. The qXh order full osculating space of <j> at x is the subspace
sp3.t\\d "d" ^ (x):Q ,
B
u
-rB
complex
200 237
HARMONIC MAPS l
where ^ :U-*C \0 is a lift of $ over a chart U containing x. The definition is clearly independent of the lift chosen. +
u
LEMMA 5.4.
If
M -* C P " is harmonic,
then for any q (0 < q < co)
and
xeM, ,
i
spm{8" d" i {x);
0 < a + /? < ?1 =
v
We show by induction on q the sharper result: For any a > 1, 1 with a + B = q, d' 3"'ty , lies in apm\8 %, 8 ^ : 0 < y < g - 1}, For q = 2 this follows from the harmonic equation (Proposition 4.6) and the formula (Lemma 4.3(h)) for D. If it is true for some o ^ 2 , then for any a > 1, 8 > 1 with a + B = q,8' 0?*$ lies in Proof.
a
l
H
(
ot
V
l
v
span|(0'%: 0 < y < q)KJ {$'3«%i
0 < y <
9
-
1)|.
By the induction hypothesis, each of the vectors in the second set lies in Similarly for d'"d" * $ , and the induction step is complete. I a
spaa\d'%:0^y^q}.
B. Isotropy
l
v
of a Smooth
Map
DEFINITION 5.5. Let
(D'
B
D"
= 0
for all
a,
8 > 0 with a + / ? > l .
(5.1)
Remark, (i) Thus
(ii) ^ : A / - * C P " is isotropic iff i a fti M-> C P " * * is isotropic. Here i : C P " - * C P * is the indicated inclusion map. n +
(iii)
Condition (5.1) is automatic by Proposition 4.5 if a + B = 1. For
a = 1 = 8 it is easily
seen to be the condition
(iv) For "(complex) pseudoholomorphic."
isotropy"
one
that &" be weakly
sometimes
said
conformal.
"strongly
For maps into an ^-sphere or into real projective n-space Calabi gave the following DEFINITION 5.6 [5]. Let j i : M - * R P " be a smooth map and let tj> : U-* R \ 0 - » C " \ 0 be a local lift with | ^ | = L Then 0 is isotropic (the terminology in [5] is "pseudoholomorphic") if v
n + ,
+ ,
(5.2)
201 238
E E L L S AND WOOD
Thus 0 is isotropic if and only if the infinite order d'-osculating space of 0 at x
s p a n ^ ' " ^ * ) : 1 < a < co| is totally isotropic for all LEMMA
5.7.
xEM.
A smooth
M A RP" 4 CP"
is
map
(S: M — IRP" is isotropic
if and
only
ifio^:
isotropic.
Proof. Since 0 is real (5.2) may be written In terms of the Hermitian inner product
(B'-'tu,
3"Vo> =
0
for all
a, B }t 0, a + 3 > 1.
Now let * be the universal lift of # and choose (i) (ii)
p
G W {^~ L) X
V
(5.3)
such that
0(p)=4 . We shall show that v
,a
(D
= 8'y
and
v
(iii) D"
6
v
+
Hence by Lemma 4.3(h), for any Ve %W~'L ® C " ' ) we have (D'V)(p) d'(V(p))\ and (ii) follows quickly. Condition (iii) is proved similarly. I
=
We may formulate isotropy in terms of covariant differentials in the tangent bundle, as follows: 5.8.
PROPOSITION
0:A/->CP"
is isotropic
)'•>, Z>'"V> = 0 where
{ , ) and
Proof.
D denote
the indicated
forall objects
iff
a>l,/?>l, in
(5.4)
^"T'CP".
It suffices to show that if either (5.1) or (5.4) holds, then i
1
D'*
= D'y,
and
H(D"W)
= D"ty
(5.5)
for all y > 1, Here D*% is calculated using the connection on jl" '7"'CP", and ft is the isomorphism (2.2). To see this, (i) if (5.1) holds, then in particular each O " * £ &{H) is orthogonal to * , so that D'
±
202 HARMONIC MAPS
239
(ii) If (5.4) holds, we establish (5.5) by induction on y. For y = 1, it is Proposition4.5. If it holds for some y > I, then (5.1) is true for all a,6^y, and therefore, by shifting D' we see that it holds for all a + B^2y. In particular, D' & 1 0, and by (4.3) we obtain (5.5) for y + I. I r+l
C.
Properties
of the Map
PROPOSITION 5.9. integer
$ Constructed
Let f:M->
(0 < r < n). Define
Then
$ is a full
isotropic
C P " be a full
3.10
holomorphic
lies in the rth D"-augmented
and
r an
by
=/ _ (x) rU<*). r
harmonic
to the ( r -
map
3.10
1
m f is orthogonal
in Proposition
l)th
1
map. Furthermore,
D"-augmented
osculating
at each point
osculating
space
space
the
of
of
subset
map
and
f
of
M.
Proof. Let g: M^>CP" be the polar of / , and set s = n - r. We shall use the equivalent formulae (3.6) and (3.7). (i) Harmonicity of o". This has already been established in Proposition 3.10, but it is instructive to give an alternative proof using calculations required later. As in Section 2C we associate subbundles of C" to the maps / , _ „ / „ g _,, g . The first two are ^''-closed (i.e., holomorphic), and the last two are ^'-closed. We shall frequently use Lemma 4.3(iii) to obtain various 3"-closure properties for D"-derivatives. For instance, take 0^p€%(^~'L); then 4>(p)€%(f ); by ^"-closure of/, and (iii), it follows that D"
s
s
f
r
r
t
r
r
r
D"D'
e Kif,
n
g s
) =
<&0%
and thus (4.5) of Proposition 4.6 holds, so ^ is harmonic. (ii) Isotropy of We have just shown that D" 'P{p)^^' {f _ ) for B= 1. By ^"-closure of f _, this holds for all 1. Similarly, £>"*#(/»)€•£,_, for all a > J. Because 0 ( p ) , / _ , , and g _, are mutually orthogonal, the isotropy condition (5.1) follows. &
u
r
l
r
r
(iii)
Fullness
of
spaniM*),
s
It suffices to show that at some point x £ Af, the d'^x):
space
1 < a < s, 1 < p < r) has dimension
n + I.
(5.6)
As in Section 3 A, let A czM be the isolated set of points x, where the nth osculating space o f / a t x has dimension
203 240
E E L L S AND WOOD JC
: 0
r
at every x&A. We first show that if x£A, then {3"Vi/( ) linearly independent set of vectors. Now by construction $ =ff
i s
a
l , <~^f , so r
{d-f^d'^^O
(5.7)
for all a ( 0 < a < r - 1) and /J = 0. Also ( ^ ' Y ^ ^ ' V ^ ^ O
for all
xeM\A,
(5.8)
for a = r and 8 = 0. By shifting 5' we see that (5.7) holds for all a,/J>0, 0 < a + / J < r - l , and (5.8) holds for all a,B^Q, a+B=r. Now if ^ofW*)"r •" + X d" $ (x) = 0 for some complex numbers A A , taking the inner product successively with 8' f (x) a = 0, 1,..., r and using (5.7) and (5.8) shows that X = ••• = A = 0. Similarly, if x g M , {5'°fS ,(x): 0 < a < s\ is a linearly independent set of vectors. By isotropy of 0, (5.6) holds at any x&A. r
r
u
0
r
a
v
r
0
f
aS
(iv) "Furthermore." By (iii) for any x&A, {d $ (x): 0 < B < r | is a linearly independent set of vectors lying in f (x); hence these vectors are a basis for f (x)- In particular, / lies in their span. Putting a = 0 in (5.7) establishes the orthogonality statement. I v
r
F
6. M A N U F A C T U R I N G HOLOMORPHIC M A P S FROM HARMONIC M A P S
A. Associated Curves of an Isotropic Harmonic Map DEFINITION 6.1.
The D'-order of a map: M -* CP" is
max dim span\D"*
Iffy is a full isotropic harmonic map, then r + s = n.
Proof By isotropy (Definition 5.5), for each xEM the D'- and I n osculating spaces at x and fy(x) are mutually orthogonal in C " , so r + s < n. If r + s < n, we could apply Lemma 5.4 to conclude that for any x £ M the jets of all orders of any local lift f at x would lie in a proper subspace of C ' . But f is real analytic, so it would also lie in that subspace, contradicting the fullness of (*. I +
p
n +
v
204 HARMONIC MAPS
241
Compare the following construction with that in Section 3A: For a full isotropic harmonic map fy:M-> CP", let B' = {xeM:
dim span(D"
B" = {x 6 M: dim span(D">0(jc): 1 < y < r ) < r). For any a (1 < a < s ) define
M\fl' - . G„(C"
+
') by
$'JX) = Q' {x) = ath reduced D'-osculating space of (*. a
L E M M A 6.3. dimension s.
At some x€M
the sth reduced D'-osculating space has
Proof. Otherwise, on some domain one of the differentials D"
Thus M\B' is nonempty. The same result is true for D"-derivatives, replacing j by r. L E M M A A N D D E F I N I T I O N 6.4. The map <j>' extends uniquely to a real analytic map ji*; M-> G (C*'), called the ath reduced associated curve of a
a
Proof. Let x E M and U a chart containing x. Consider the map wE%{A (fy-'L*®C )) defined by w(x) = D'^(x) A ••• A D'"
,+
l
a
r
,
a
L
1
1
r
Proof of Claim. By Lemma4.8, D"(D'
p
a
205 242
Remark 6.5. zero map.
E E L L S AND WOOD +
(i)
It is convenient to set f : A f - G ( C ' ) equal to the Q
0
(ii) To define
(iii) For 0 < / J < r the Bih reduced ZJ" associated curve of 0 may be defined similarly, using D" in place of D'. DEFINITION
of
6.6.
For 0 < a < s the ath augmented D'-associated curve
1
^:^/-G is defined by
=
, ,
a
+
1
(C• )
© +
It is convenient to define ptj: M -* G ( C ' ) to be the zero map. For 0 < / ? < r the 8th augmented D"-associated curve of o is similarly defined. 0
Remark 6.7. If is holomorphic (resp. antiholomorphic), then $' (resp. is the ath associated curve of as defined in Section 3A. a
B. Construction of Holomorphic Maps PROPOSITION 6.8. Let tj>: A/-> C P " be a full isotropic harmonic map. Set r = D"-order off, and define f: M-* CP" by 1
m
= r;.,(x) nr;( y,
(6.1)
x
or equivalently, by f{x)
= ($"_ (x)@ i' (x))\ 1
r
(6.2)
s
where s = n- r. Then f is holomorphic and full. Furthermore, $(x) = Proof, (i) Holomorphicity. We use the bijective correspondence between maps M -* G ( C ' ) and subbundles of C " of rank / described in Section 2C. By the version of Lemma 5.2 for D"-derivatives, we see that (the subbundle corresponding to) fy" is ^''-closed; i.e., holomorphic. By the version of Lemma4.8 with D" and D' derivatives interchanged, for 0 < / ? < r — 1, £>'D""0 has values in the space +
+ 1
(
fl
span((D" #:0
2} U |Z>'4>}).
By isotropy, D ' 0 is orthogonal to $' '; hence, in the subbundle connection r
206 HARMONIC MAPS
243
1
(see Section 2B) D on f ^ c C " * , the subbundle is D'-closed. We conclude from Section 2B that its orthogonal complement in iji" (namely, fy'r'-i^K) i>"-closed. Since fj is a holomorphic subbundle of C , it follows easily that is a holomorphic subbundle of C , so/is holomorphic. (An alternative argument using (6.2) is to show that ®$' is a d'-closed subbundle of C , hence its orthogonal complement is enclosed... .) i s
+
+
l
l
s
n + I
(ii)
Fullness. Let $ J V
be local lifts of
V
f l e i l l
We shall show that
o
8"fu^^r)
(6-3)
and
To establish (6.3) we prove the sharper result for
0 < a < r,
d' % G
., n $).
(6.5)
For a = 0 this follows from the definition of / We now assume r > 1 and that (6.5) holds for some a ( 0 < a < r - l ) . Then in particular, d'"f €. Now it is easy to see from Lemma 4.8 with D" and D' interchanged and (4.5) of Lemma 4.3 that J ' W ) c W ) Hence d' %E Wffi). Now for any a eif(
ai
a
(8'
a
+
l
a
a
%, a) = 8'(8' / , t!
aJr
,
a) - $ % , m >
~ 0.
i
Therefore, d' % G ^ , W _ _ ) ; by induction, (6.5) follows. To establish (6.4), note that (
r
a
<3'%.3"V > = 0 V
<2'%(*). 5" Vt/W> *
0
J
for all
B>0,a
+ B^r-
for all
x^ B",a,f3^0,a
1,
(6.6)
+ B = r.
(6.7)
Indeed, by definition of / , these both hold for a = 0; and we may shift 5' in the usual way. Now define g:Af-»CP" by formulae analogous to (6.1) and (6.2) g(x) =
,{xY n fax) =
,(*) ® f (x))\ r
(6.8)
where s = £>'-order of ^ = n — r. Then reasoning similar to that above shows that g is antiholomorphic; and for any local lift g , 0
d" g e&m d'" enfc) B
v
gu
(O<0<s-1), with
(Mxid-'gvWV^o
(6.9) (6.io)
207 244
EELLS AND WOOD
for all x i B'. Combining (6.3), (6.4), (6.7), and (6.8) we find that
for 0 < a < r - 1, 0 < / i < s - 1, and hence by shifting 8\ for all a,B^0 with « + / ? < * - 2 . Also 6
WM*),
S" g (x))
* 0
v
if x f B ' U 5",
for a = s, B = r, and consequently, for all a.B^O with a -I- B = n — 1. It follows from Lemma 3.7 that / is full—and in fact, that g is the polar of f. (iii) "Furthermore." From (6.6) with /i = 0 we see that $ £ ^ { J r - x ) Since / is full, (6.3) implies that f (x) = $ (x) for all x€M; in particular, s
r
^ e ^ m
r
so i
^)=/ _ (x) n/ (x) f
as desired.
1
r
I
C. The Classification Theorem THEOREM 6.9. Let M be an arbitrary Riemann surface. There is a bijective correspondence between full isotropic harmonic maps «S:A/-»CIP" and pairs (fr), where / : A / - » C P " is a full holomorphic map and r is an integer (0 < r < n), given as follows : (i)
r = D"-order of
(
1
= (f '.,(x)®r M) F
6
1
1
)
vtttk s = n-r.
s
Conversely, (ii)
1
m=fr-,M nf (x) r
where s = n — r and g Is the polar off We call (/, r) the directrix of §. Proof. Combine Propositions 5.9 and 6.8, noting that the last statement of Proposition 5.9 yields (6.11) when translated into the language of associated curves of
208 HARMONIC MAPS
(ii)
245
Alternative formulae for $ are
m=Mn$M m (iii) curves:
(6i3)
1
= g - (x) r (x). s l
(6.14)
igs
The proofs reveal the following relations between associated
f = W- -yn$ ' a
a
(0
r
fc^i-j-il'n^; (iv)
(0
To compute 0, take a local lift / „ . Then a local lift of
by
(=0
Regarding R P " as the real points classification theorem:
of C P " , we recover Calabi's
COROLLARY 6.11. There is a bijective correspondence between full isotropic harmonic maps tji:M-> R P and full totally isotropic holomorphic maps/: M-> C P ' , given by (6.11) and (6.12). 2 R
!
Proof. Any such ij> is real, so the ath D'-osculating space is the conjugate of the ath Z) "-osculating space, so r = s = n/2. Comparing (6.8) and (6.11), we see that the polar g of / is / , hence by Definition 3.13, / is totally isotropic. Conversely, given / the map i o M-* CP" constructed by Theorem 6.7 is full, isotropic, and harmonic. It follows from Lemma 3.12 and 5.7 that f t : M - * R P " is, as well. I Remark 6.12. Borchers and Garber [3] gave an iterative scheme for finding all totally isotropic holomorphic m a p s / : A / - > C P ' . 2
7. C A S E S W H E R E T H E ISOTROPY R E L A T I O N S H O L D
A. The Degree Let M be a compact Riemann surface of genus p. Let/: M -» CP" be a full holomorphic map. The ramification index B = B {f) of / i s the number of zeros of 3'/counted according to multiplicity. More generally, we write p
p
0
0
209 246
E E L L S AND WOOD
B = B (f) for the ramification index of the ath associated curve f have the Plticker relations (see, for example, [21]) a
a
off. We
a
deg/ - 2 deg/- _, 4- deg/„ _ = Ip - 2 - B _ , , a
a
%
(7.1)
a
where 1 < a ^ r and we have set deg/_, = 0. PROPOSITION 7.1. Let tp:M^> CP" be a full isotropic harmonic map. Let (f r) be its directrix, and g the polar off. Then (i) relative lo any Hermitian metric on M, the (1,0) and (0,1) energy densities {Section 2D) of $ are given by e'V)
= e'ifr- .X
= e"(g -i) = e'(f ). s
r
Consequently, if M = M is a compact Riemann surface of genus p, p
(ii)
the energy of $ is given by
Em
=4(0=
B ( / r - . ) + E(g _,) s
= ^ - |deg/ _ j r
degg _,} s
= — I d e g / ^ + deg/,.,}. Here A(<j>) = area of $ {see Section 2E); and c is frte ua/ue holomorphic sectional curvature of CP". (iii)
the constant
(Af (Browwer) degree of $ is given by deg?i = - d e g / _ f
=
l
-degg _, s
deg/ -deg/ _, f
r
= r ( 2 / > - 2 ) - V / J + deg/. a
/Voo/ (i) View £ as the composition of the map V = (/,_,, g _ ): M -* G^G**^>SG (C***j and the antiholomorphic map / 7 : t / - » C P " with notations as in the proof of Lemma 3.9. Recalling that n = n\:^ — CP" is a Riemannian submersion, we see that s
f
r
=
= e'(/r-t) + e'(*.-i) =
because gj_, is antiholomorphic. Similarly,
because g _ =fi s
1
(Remark 3.8(ii)).
s
L
210 HARMONIC MAPS
(ii)
Integrate these densities over Af, and use (58]
n
valid for any smooth map ^: (iii)
247
M ->CP . p
For the last line, add Pliicker's formulae (7.1) for 1 < a < r.
I
Remark. I f / is totally isotropic, g _, = / _ , • Therefore the energy of the harmonic map fiSf.-* IRP with directrix / i s (87r/c)deg/._,. s
r
2r
2
Setting c = 4 (recall in Section 2 that R P ^ c C P ' then has constant sectional curvature 1) gives £(5!) = A($) = In deg/,_,, as established fay Barbosa [2]. He also shows that the total isotropy of / implies that the degree of / , _ , is even, so the energy is an integral multiple of 4n. B. Certain Isotropy Properties Let 0 be the universal lift of a harmonic map ': A/-* CP". On any chart U of Af set
Note that from Proposition 4.5 we have 0
>/
Let y be an integer (1 < y < co), and suppose that n
a
= 0
B
for alt a, £ > 0 with 1 < a + 8< y. Then e \ , .
1
W = -(y+l)tW'7MW
for all
xEU,
(7.3)
where 1
K(X) =
\D'4>( )\ -\D"
2
x
as in Lemma 4.7. Proof.
We have B"n .
v+l 1
=
,YI
d"(D -'
= (D"D' 4>,D"
! +,
+
Now using Lemma 4.7 to interchange D" and D' in the first inner product, and using the harmonic equation (Proposition 4.6) and the present hypothesis, d"n
f+ul
where u' = |
= (D'W'D'ip,
y
y+,
D"
and ft" = \D"
0)
211 248
E E L L S AND WOOD
Using the harmonic equation on the first term and shifting D' in the third term, H
d 1j+... = {D'\-p'
+ u"(D"
%1
-v'n . -y
= as required.
*>"*> " m
-(y+l) n K
yA
I
C . The Case of the Sphere PROPOSITION
7.3
12, 20].
Any
harmonic map
is
isotropic. Proof We show that n = 0 for all a, B > 0, a + B > I by induction on a-\-B. If a + / ? = l , this is trivial, as already remarked. If r/ s0 for a + B < y + 1 for some y > 0 then by Lemma 7.2, n , , az is a globally defined holomorphic differential on M (i.e., a holomorphic section of the holomorphic line bundle 7 " * ' A / ) . But any such differential vanishes (since the line bundle has negative degree). Therefore 17 , , = 0 . By shifting D' in the definition of 17,4.1,1, it quickly follows that n = 0 for all a + P = y + 2, completing the induction step. n
a
a3
>,+;
y+
a
lr+i
0>
0
+
aJ>
Remark. In (11, 12, 20] more analytical proofs are given, replacing the topological proof that there are no nonzero holomorphic differentials on a sphere by a Liouville-type argument. From Theorem 6.9 we deduce C O R O L L A R Y 7.4. The assignment of directrix defines a bijective correspondence between full harmonic maps § from the Riemann sphere M to C P " and pairs (f, r), where f: M -» C P " is a full holomorphic map and r an integer (0 < r < n). 0
a
As remarked in the Introduction, Corollary 7.4 was known to the authors of |11, 12, 20]. C O R O L L A R Y 7.5 [2, 5, 6, 8, 9]. The assignment of directrix defines a bijective correspondence between full harmonic maps ^: A/ -* R P and full totally isotropic holomorphic maps f: Af -* CP '. J r
0
2
0
Remark. algebraic.
It is easily deduced that any harmonic map
D. The Case of the Torus PROPOSITION 7.6. isotropic.
Any harmonic map
A/, -* C P " of nonzero degree is
212 HARMONIC MAPS
249
Proof. Any torus Af, is conformally equivalent to C / r f o r some lattice F, Then each w is a globally well-defined function on C/F. Consider the induction hypothesis Kifl
(W ): 7 , = 0 y
Q
fl
forali
a,B>0,
l
and n is constant, where y > I. Now (//,) is true, since by Lemma 7.2, #"17, , = 0, so that tjj., is a holomorphic function on C/F and is therefore constant. Suppose (H ) is true. Integrating (7.3) over M = C/F gives rJ
y
t
0 = -(y+ i)%
f
3
M
K(*)«> (*).
Now as in Section 2D, the integral is a nonzero multiple of the degree of 0, so that if deg$i#0, then M = 0 . By shifting D' in (7.2) we see that rj = 0 for all a, B > 0, a + / J = y + 1. But then by Lemma 7.2, 8"n , j = 0, so that , , is a holomorphic function on C/F; it is therefore constant, and the induction step is completed. I rl
a fl
Remark. Proposition 7.1 is an extension of the second author's result [59] that any harmonic map <j>: M , -> CP" of nonzero degree is weakly conformal. Using the formula (Proposition 7.1{iii)} for the degree, we deduce COROLLARY 7.7. The assignment of directrix defines a bijective correspondence between full harmonic maps (4: A/, — C P " of nonzero degree and pairs (fr), where / : M , - » C P is a full holomorphic map and r an integer such that deg/ j= deg/,_,. 1
r
E. Higher Genus We cannot hope to prove that every harmonic map M -*CP" is isotropic. For if p ^ 1 and 0 < | d | < p — 1 , Lemaire [36] has constructed Riemann surfaces M and harmonic non ±-holomorphic maps A/„-> C P of degree d. Such maps are not isotropic. That suggests that a natural generalisation of Propositions 7.3 and 7.4 would be that any harmonic map A/p-* C P " of I degree I > / J is isotropic. That is true for n = I; but we have no idea of its validity for n > 2. However, we can give two isotropy results for n = 2: P
1
p
PROPOSITION 7.8.
Let ^ : A / - > C P P
2
be a weakly conformal harmonic
map with [deg 0| > Ip — 1. Then $ is isotropic. Proof As in the proof of Theorem 6.4 (see also Remark 6.5(ii)), we can show that D'
213 250
E E L L S AND WOOD 2
L
w = D'&A £>''<£ is a local holomorphic section of A $~'(L* ® L) = A $~ T'CP . It follows that wdr" is a global holomorphic section of the holomorphic line bundle 2
l
2
liM
1
T* M
T'CP ,
p
which has degree i(2p - 2) + 3 deg 0; if -deg
a
Wo
f o r
fl
a l 1
a
PROBLEM. (i) (ii) (iii)
IS Proposition 7.8 true,
without demanding weak conformality, for all n > 2. for deg
> pi
By [17), (i) and (iii) hold for » = 1 , If (4: M-> CP is a smooth map, then 2
max dim S'(x) = I, 2 or 3; the first possibility occurs iff f* is antiholomorphic. For <* a full harmonic map we can characterise isotropy in terms of that number: PROPOSITION 7.9. / / %S\ M-> C P ± holomorphic, then $ is isotropic iff
3
is
full,
harmonic,
and
not
max dim 9L(x) = 2. Proof. The necessity is clear, for S'(x) = $(x) © t)'{x), these two spaces being orthogonal; and 9'(x) is nontrivial for some xEM, because 0 is not antiholomorphic. For the sufficiency we note as in Remark 6.5(ii) that we can always define the first D'-associated curve £J: M-> C , ( C ) of fi and thus the first augmented D'-associated curve $\ = o © M-• G^C). As in Section 2C we associate to $\ a subbundle of C of rank 2, which we shall denote by V. Let us show that V is 8'-closed: For all x in an open dense set,
J
x
2
w
x
214 HARMONIC MAPS
251
and xEM such that D'"
0
r
v
x
a
8. E X A M P L E S AND REMARKS A.
We discuss how to construct harmonic non ±-hoIomorphic maps 0: M -* C P " of various degrees, using the classification theorem. The case n = 2 is considered First, with r — I . Then the harmonic map 0 = f-Of, with directrix/: M -< CP is non i-holomorphic and has p
2
p
deg } = deg/, - deg/= d e g / - 0 (f) + (2p - 2),
(8.1)
o
where (as in Section 7A) 8 {f) is the ramification index of / Note that any full holomorphic map f: M ->CP" has degree >ft [21]. 0
p
B. The Case M„ EXAMPLE 8.1. The Veronese map f: M -> CP" given by z -* [l,z,...,r"j is fuil and has d e g / = n ; / i s unramified. Taking n = 2, the Veronese map determines (via Theorem 6.9) a full harmonic non i-holomorphic map f M - i C P of degree 0. Indeed, 0
!
0
(z) = [z + 2zz\-l
4- zH\ - 2 z - z%L
« c o ) = [ 0 , 1,0]. The computation is made using Remark 6.10(iii), using local lifts over C c M ^ C U GO. 2
2
EXAMPLE 8.2. Define / : M -> C P b y / ( z ) = ]1, z 4 - z \ z ] . T h e n / h a s degree 3 and is unramified. It determines the harmonic non ±-holomorphic map ( * : A / - > C P of degree 1, given by 0
2
0
2
2
3
2
3
«Kz) = \z + 2zz + 3z z + z 4- 3z z , 2
2
2
2
2
2
3
- 1 - 3z 4- z z - z'z , -2z - z z-z z rtco)=|0,0,
IJ.
4
1
+ z z + z'z ),
215 252
E E L L S AND WOOD
T H E O R E M 8.3. For n^.2 there are harmonic non ±-holomorphic maps M -» C P " of all degrees. For n = 2 such maps are necessarily full. 0
Proof Compose the above examples with the ±-holomorphic maps z-*z (kEl) and the totally geodesic inclusion C P c z C P " . The second assertion follows from the first Remark 8.4. k
2
Remark 8.4. (i) As noted in the Introduction, Theorem 8.3 is false for n = 1 (17]. See [63 j for further results for n >2. (ii) If / is totally isotropic, then combining results of Calabi |5, 6] and Barbosa (2], the energy of 0: A/ -> R P is 4xk, where k is an integer ^ r ( r + l)/2. Barbosa has exhibited examples for each such k. 2 r
0
(iii) If we demand that the Gauss curvature JC of the pull-back metric be constant, then K = 2/r(r+ I ) . Such an immersion is uniquely determined up to rigid motions of S , and is given by spherical harmonics. These maps give the minimum allowable energy 2nr(r + 1) (2,4-6]. They are particularly interesting for other reasons as well: By a theorem of Smith [51], they can be harmonically suspended up to 6 times. 2r
1
(iv) Construction of certain equivariant harmonic maps M - * S ' for p = 0, I has been made by Uhlenbeck (55,56). p
2r
(v) Recall that for r > 1 the homotopy classes of maps M ->¥tP are classified by / / ' ( A / ^ Z , ) through o w h e r e M>, is the generator of H'{¥tP ; Z ). A theorem of Lemaire [35] and Sacks and Uhlenbeck |45] ensures that every such homotopy class has a harmonic representative which is a minimum of the energy. By way of contrast, we note p
1
2r
2
2
PROPOSITION 8.5. Any isotropic harmonic map M -- R P ' homotopic, and therefore is never a minimum of the energy. p
is null
Proof. Any isotropic harmonic map ^ is a composition T o/,__,: Af,,-^ - > R P . From the homotopy sequences of the fibrations , S (a ^ 2), we see that 2 r
2a
r
x (t*d t
since ^
= s M -
, ) = • • = *iC*D = o.
= S'. We conclude that 0*(w,) = O, so that 0 is null homotopic.
C. The Case A/, E X A M P L E 8.6. There is a full harmonic non ±-holomorphic map from any torus A/, to C P of degree 1. This is constructed by applying the classification theorem to the holomorphic map produced by 2
LEMMA 8.7. For any torus M there is a full /: M -» C P of degree 5 and ramification index 4. t
Z
s
holomorphic map
216 HARMONIC MAPS
253 2
Proof. It suffices to construct an elliptic curve i s ' e C P of arbitrary conformal type with degree 5 and 4 cusps (counted according to order). Our curve E' has 2 first order cusps (parametrized locally by z -* (z , z ) ) and 1 second order cusp (parametrized locally by z ->(z\z )). (From the genus formula [47], E' has no double points.) We are grateful to M. Ishida for showing us the following construction: Take any cubic curve E in C P . Let P, Q be points of E, where the tangent line touches E with orders 3, 2, respectively; denote these tangent lines by /,, / j . Note that /, ?fc / . Let R be the remaining point of intersection of / with the curve; let S be the point of intersection of /, and l . Note that S=£R. Let T be a point other than Q whose tangent line passes through R, as in Fig. 1. Consider the curve c = (c , c ): E - » C P ' X C P , where c , c are projections from R and S onto some projective line. It is easy to see that c is injective and that 0(E) has a cusp of order one at (4(£?) and no other cusps. See Fig. 2. Choose v = {^ (T), $ (P)). Note that v does not lie in 0 ( £ ) , so that we can blow up C P ' X C P at v. The resulting self intersection numbers are shown in Fig. 3. We may blow down along the lines c,,c to give a curve E' czCP depicted in Fig. 4. By parametrizing tj>{E) near Q, P, T we easily see that Q remains a cusp of order I, whereas P and T become cusps of order 2 and I, respectively. Since the curve meets any of the three projective lines depicted 2
3
1
2
2
;
2
1
R
R
s
s
s
S
1
2
2
PIOURE
1
217 254
E E L L S AND WOOD
Cf
1
FIGURE 2
in Fig. 4 five times (counted according to multiplicity), we see that E ' has degree 5. THEOREM 8.8. (i) For any torus M and any n > 2 there exist harmonic non ±-holomorphic maps
(ii)
If degree $ ^ 0 and n = 2 swcA a map is necessarily full. 1
(iii) If degree = 0 and « = 2 Mere are do/A full and nonfull examples of such maps. Proof. Given any torus M , and integer d ^ O there exists another torus M\ and a ±-holomorphic covering map y/: A/, -»MI of degree d. (To see this, it suffices to consider d > 0. Let l"j denote the lattice of C generated by 1, A € C (Im X ^ 0); then any torus M , is conformally equivalent to C/F for some k. The identity map on C factors to give a holomorphic covering map M, = C / r , - » C / F = M\ of degree d.) Composing ip with the map of Example 8.6 gives a harmonic map 0 : A / , - > C P of degree d. Since A
A/k
I
-1
0
0 F I G U R E
3
218 HARMONIC MAPS
255
P
Q
R F I G U R E
T 4
Example 8.6 is not ± holomorphic, but if/ is, it easily follows that 0 is not ± holomorphic. For zero degree we may take either R. T. Smith's non i-holomorphic harmonic map (51] of degree 0 from Af, to C P and compose with C P - » C P ' , or we may compose any holomorphic nonconstant map Af,->Af,, with the map of Example 8.1. These maps are nonfull and full, respectively. Finally, any of these maps may be composed with the totally geodesic inclusion C P ' - > C P " . Assertion (ii) follows from Remark 8.9. 1
1
Remark 8.9.
(i)
Theorem 8.8(i) is false for n = 1 and
0 [17].
(ii) If Af, is conformally equivalent to the square torus S' X S', then a full harmonic non i-holomorphic isometric embedding of Af, in CP of degree 0 has been given in [39]. 2
D. The Case of Higher Genus THEOREM 8.10. Lei n^2. Given any closed Riemann surface M , there exist harmonic non holomorphic maps M -* C P " of all degrees d^p + I,as well as rf = 0. Any harmonic non holomorphic map M -
p
2
p
Proof. Simply compose a holomorphic map M -» M of degree d with the map of Example 8.1. The fullness statement follows from Remark 8.11. p
a
Remark 8.11. Theorem 8.10 is false for M = 1, because any harmonic map M -> M of degree d '^-p is holomorphic [17]. p
0
219 256
E E L L S AND WOOD
PROBLEM. IS Theorem 8.10 true for d
T H E O R E M 8.11. Let n ^ 2 and p^2. Then for any integer d there is a closed Riemann surface M and a harmonic non ±-holomorphic map f A f - » C P of degree d. B
n
p
Proof. For any d > 2 we can construct a branched covering map \y: M -j* M of degree d. Give M the induced complex structure, so that if is holomorphic. Now compose y with the map in Example 8.1. For 0 < d < p — 1 Lemaire j36j gave harmonic non ±-holomorphic maps M -> C P ' , which can be composed with the totally geodesic embedding C P c C P " . The theorem now follows. I p
0
p
p
1
E. Maps into Other Spaces C P " has natural totally geodesic embeddings in real, complex, and quaternionic Grassmannians [8]; consequently, the results of Sections 8 A - D provide significant harmonic maps of Riemann surfaces into these. For instance, from Theorem 8.8 we find that for n > 2 k ^ 1 there exist harmonic non ±-holomorphic maps M -* 6 ( C * ) of all degrees. B +
x
S
F. Maps from Nonorientable Surfaces Let M' be a nonorientable surface with a given conformal structure, and let p:M-tM' be its orientable double cover. Let a: M -* M be the nontrivial antiholomorphic covering transformation. Then a map §\M->N factors through M' iff 0 ° o = j*. Say $:M'->N is isotropic if <j> o p is. PROPOSITION 8.12. The classification theorem gives a bijective correspondence between full isotropic harmonic maps $:M' - > C P and full holomorphic maps f:M-> CP whose polar g is given byf° a. There are no full isotropic harmonic maps <j>: M' -* C P " if n is odd. Jr
7r
Proof so that
Lift a given <j> to M\ then <j>{x) = $(ox). Now a is antiholomorphic,
¥%^=8»^ $x) &
using #
alU)
= $° v
for all
a>0,
o. Therefore, the osculating spaces S' (x) = (7^{o(x)) a
for all
a > 0,
so that by (6.11) and (6.8) we find r = s and g(x) =f{o{x)). similar, using (6.12) and (6.14).
The converse is
220 HARMONIC MAPS
257 2
EXAMPLES. Any harmonic map from IRIP is isotropic. The inclusion map IF?P CIP is a full isotropic harmonic map. Consequently, there exist full holomorphic maps f. M - » C P with polar g =f° o. :
2
3
B
G. Branch Points Since an isotropic harmonic map is a branched minimal immersion, its only singularities are branch points in the sense of [24]. We estimate the number of these. As in Section 7A let B„(f) denote the ramification index of the ath associated curve f of a full holomorphic map f: M -* CP". a
PROPOSITION 8.13.
Let $: M -> C P " be a full
isotropic harmonic non ±-
holomorphic map from an arbitrary Riemann surface. Let (f, r) be the directrix of
Proof. (i)
y
r
If g is the polar of/, then as in Section 2F, for x € M t ^ ( * ) = 0 i f f 5 7 _ , ( * ) = 0; r
(ii)
d'ftx)
Therefore, i
= 0 iff d"g _Ax) = 0; iff B-fXx) = 0. s
is a branch point of (I iff d$(x) = 0, iff d'
d" (x) = 0, iff d'f _ M = 0 and d'f (x) = 0. A
r
r
I
Remark. To produce a full isotropic harmonic non ±-holomorphic map which is everywhere a conformal immersion, we need only ensure that 8'f _, and d'f have no common zeros. r
r
H. Problem Let p^l and a: M -> A(M) be the canonical holomorphic map into the Albanese torus of M (see [4, Sect.7]). The Gauss map y: M„-* C P " " ' coincides with the canonical curve of M [21, p. 360]; with their conventions y is holomorphic, whereas with those of [41] y is antiholomorphic. Our classification theorem ensures that for each 0 < r < p — 1 we have isotropic harmonic maps M - t C P " ~ ' whose directrices are (y, r). Describe those maps explicitly. p
p
p
p
PROBLEM. the quadric
C P " is a maximal connected totally geodesic submanifold of
Qtn-i « 50(2/1 + 1 )/SO(2) X SO(2n - 1). Which directrices (f, r) produce harmonic maps 0: M-> C P " A Q -i such that the composition jo $ is the Gauss map (up to an automorphism) of an 2n
221 258
E E L L S AND WOOD 2
immersion of constant mean curvature M — S "? In that order of ideas we recall the theorem of Lawson [34, p. 173] (as part of Calabi's classification of minimal surfaces in Euclidean spaces): Let i//: Af-tlR " be a minimal immersion with Gauss map y^. M-» g _ - There is an orthogonal complex structure on IR " with respect to which p is holomorphic iff y factors through some totally geodesic embedding j : P -> Q „_ . !
2 n
2
2
a
k
2
9.
2
A N E S T I M A T E FOR T H E M O R S E INDEX
A . Complex Variations Take a 2-parameter variation
p
e
8E'(4>) _ 1 8E{
2
8 E'(
1 8 E(
d'E"^)
2
8s ds
8s 8s
In terms of complex charts ((/, z) on M we have the following formula for a complex variation of a harmonic map >ji: A/„-» CP". It is convenient to write subscripts to indicate derivatives with respect to the parameter s or complex chart so that = 0 = 8"$ in our earlier notation. p
f
2
8 E"(
4(
ilDA-l + l ^ - r 7
+ «ffe, W?, fc, +
. £ , h> ii)
-2ReR{fc,J:,
Here R denotes the curvature tensor on 7 T P " and D the pull-back connection on W = ^-'T'CP . n
Remarks, (i) The special complex version for that second variation formula has been used by Suzuki [53, 54] (in a study of pseudoconvexity problems) and by Siu and Yau [48J (see Section 9B). Another form has been obtained by Ishihara [28]. (ii) The integrands in the third and fourth terms in the right members are minus the holomorphic bisectional curvatures of (0 , (i ) and ( ^ , ^ ) , respectively. f
r
r
222 HARMONIC MAPS
259
B . Holomorphic Variations In order to proceed, recall from Section 2C that the induced vector bundle W-+M has a canonical holomorphic structure with holomorphic sections v characterised by D"v = 0. Now let v be a holomorphic section of W\ we call such a section a holomorphic vector field along
c
p
3
3
! =0
s v.
For such a holomorphic variation of 0, the second variation formula reduces to 8 E"(
8s 8s As a partial converse to Lichnerowicz's theorem Section 2D, we have
|38|
mentioned in
PROPOSITION 9.1. If
Proof We may restrict ourselves to the case where deg((*) > 0. If 0 is not holomorphic, then there is an open set U on which #1, j= 0 and 0. Since C P " has strictly positive holomorphic bisectional curvature, the above integrand is nonnegative, and is positive on U. It follows that 2
8 E"(
<0, ! =0
contradicting the assumption that Index(0) = O. Remarks. Siu and Yau [48] have used the decomposition theorem of Birkhoff-Grothendieck to show that there is a nontrivial holomorphic variation of a harmonic map M -»CP". Consequently, a harmonic map (4: A/ -> CP" of deg((4) > 0 Is holomorphic iff Index(fi) = 0. 0
0
C. The Estimate The Riemann-Roch theorem for a holomorphic vector bundle IV—M rank n is [23, 27, 40] 0
p
of
d i m W ( M , H O - d i m / / ' ( M , H O = c (^"»0[Af ,] + « ( l - p ) . (9.1) c
p
c
p
1
J
We apply that to the present situation W= ^ " ' T ' C P " . Then c,(A"t" ' T ' C P " ) = ^*c,(A "T'CP")
=
l
n
^*c,(T CP )
223
260
E E L L S A N D WOOD
from [27, p. 98]. Therefore dim H*(M , c
p
H 0 - d i r n / / ' ( / t f , , HQ = deg(*)(n + c
+
-p).
For any harmonic nonholomorphic map M -> C P " , a nonzero element Ii. G H°{M , W) defines a variation for which p
p
d E"(
o PROPOSITION 9.2. I n d e x ( 0 ) > d i m H ° ( A f , W) c
p
>deg(^K«+ l) + « 0 - p ) . C O R O L L A R Y 9.3.
£er (*:A/ -»CP"
oe a harmonic map of deg(^) >
p
" ( . P - ! ) / ( « + 0- TVteu ^ is holomorphic
lndex(0) = 0.
D. 77ie tfea/ Cose A theorem of Leung [37] ensures that for r> 1 any full harmonic map !*: M -> S has Index(<>) > 0. 2r
p
PROBLEM. Give a significant lower bound for Index(^). Applying (9.1) to $~'TS in casep = 0, it appears that Index(^) > 2r. In casep~ 1 we can be guided by the explicit results in [30,31]. 2r
REFERENCES 1. M . F , ATIYAH, N . J . HITCHIN, AND I . M. SINGER. Self-duality in four-dimensional Riemannian geometry, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Set. A 362 (1978), 425-461. 2. J . BARBOSA, On minimal immersions of S into S ", Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 210 (1975), 75-106. 3. H . J . BORCHERS AND W. D . GARBER, Local theory of solutions for the 0(2*+ 1) omodel. Comm. Math. Phys. 7 2 (1980), 77-102. 4. O. BORUVKA, Sur les surfaces representees par les fonctions spheriques de premiere espece, J. Math. Pures Appl (9) 12 (1933), 337-383. 5. E . CALABI, Quelques applications de I'analyse complexe aux surfaces d'aire minima, in "Topics in Complex Manifolds," pp, 59-81, Univ. of Montreal. 1967. 6. E. CALABI, Minimal immersions of surfaces in Euclidean spheres, / . Differential Geom. I (1967), 111-125. 7. R. CATENACCJ AND C . REINA, Algebraic classification of C P " instanton solutions, Lett. Math. Phys. 5 (1981). 469-173. 8. B Y. CHEN AND T. NAGANO, Totally geodesic submanifolds of symmetric spaces 1, I I . Duke Math. J. 44 (1977), 745-755; 45 (1978), 405-125. 1
1
224
HARMONIC MAPS
261
9. S . S. C H E R N , On the minimal immersions of the two-sphere in a space of constant curvature, in "Problems in Analysis," pp. 27—10, Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton, N . J . . 1970. 10. S. S. C H E R N , "On Minimal Spheres in the Four Sphere," pp. 137-150. studies and essays presented to Y . W . Chen, Taiwan, 1970. 1.1, A, M. D I N AND W. J . Z A K R Z E W S K I , General classical solutions in the C P " " ' model, Nuclear Phys. B 1 7 4 (1980), 397-406. 12. A. M, D I N AND W. J . Z A K R Z E W S K I , Properties of the general classical C P " " model, Phys. Leu. B 9 5 (1980), 419^122. 13. A. M, D I N AND W. J . Z A K R Z E W S K I . Classical solutions in Grassmannian o-models, Lett. Math. Phys. 5 (1981), 553-561. 14. J . E E L L S AND L . L E M A I R E , A report on harmonic maps. Bull. London Math. Soc. 10 (1978), 1-68. 15. J . E E L L S AND L . L E M A I R E , On the construction of harmonic and holomorphic maps between surfaces, Malh. Ann. 2 5 2 (1980), 27-52. 16. J . E E L L S AND J, H. SAMPSON. Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds. Amer. J. Math. 8 6 (1964), 109-160. 17. J . E E L L S AND J . C . W O O D , Restrictions on harmonic maps of surfaces. Topology 15 (1976), 263-266. 18. J . E E L L S AND J . C . W O O D , Maps of minimum energy, J. London Math. Soc. 23 (1981), 303-310. 19. J . E E L L S AND J . C. W O O D , The existence and construction of certain harmonic maps, in "Symp. Math., X X V I , " pp. 123-138, Rome. 1981. 20. V . G L A S E R A N D R. S T O R A , Regular solutions of the C P " models and further generalizations, preprint. 1980. 21. P. G R I F F I T H S AND J . H A R R I S . Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley-lnterscience, New York. 1978. 22. P. G R I F F I T H S AND W. S C H M I D . Locally homogeneous complex manifolds, Acta Math. 123 (1969), 253-301. 23. R . C . G U N N I N G , Lectures on vector bundles over Riemann surfaces, Mathematical Notes, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1967. 24. R . D . G U L L I V E R . R. O S S E R M A N , AND H . R O Y D E N , A theory of branched immersions of surfaces, Amer. J. Math. 9 5 (1973), 750-812. 25. E . H E I N Z AND S. H I L D E B R A N D T , Some remarks on minimal surfaces in Riemannian manifolds. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 2 3 (1970), 371-377. 26. S . H E L G A S O N , A duality for symmetric spaces with applications to group representations. Advan. Math. 5 (1970), 1-154. 27. F . H I R Z E B R U C H , "Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry.' Grundlehren 131, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, 1978. 28. T . ISHIHARA. The index of a holomorphic mapping and the index theorem. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 6 (1977). 169-174. 29. T. ISHIHARA, The harmonic Gauss map in a generalized sense, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 2 6 (1982), 104-112. 1
30. K . K E N M O T S U , On compact minimal surfaces with nonnegative Gaussian curvature in a space of constant curvature I , I I , Tohoku Math. J. 2 5 (1973). 469-479; 2 7 (1975), 291-301. 31. K . K E N M O T S U , On minimal immersions of IF) into S". J. Math. Soc. Japan 2 8 (1976), 182-191. 32. S. K O B A V A S H J AND K . N O M I Z U , Foundations of Differential Geometry I, I I , Wileylnterscience, New York, 1963; 1969. 33. J . L . K O S Z U L AND B. M A L G R A N G E . Sur certaines structures fibrees complexes. Arch. Math. 9 (1958), 102-109. 1
262
E E L L S
A N D
W O O D
35.
H. B. L A W S O N , "Lectures on Minimal Surfaces," Math. Lecture Series, No. 9 , Publish or Perish, Berkeley, Calif., 1 9 8 0 . L. L E M A I R E , Applications harmoniques de surfaces riemanniennes, J. Differential Geom. 13
( 1 9 7 8 ) ,
36.
L,
LEMAIRE.
34.
5 1 - 7 8 .
Math. Soc. 37.
38.
39.
40.
Harmonic nonholomorphic maps from a surface to a sphere, Proc. Amer,
71
(1978),
2 9 9 - 3 0 4 ,
On the stability of harmonic maps, preprint 1 9 8 1 ; Thesis, Univ. of Notre Dame, Ind., 1 9 8 1 . A. L I C H N E R O W I C Z , Applications harmoniques et varietes kahleriennes, in "Symp. Math.. Ill," pp. 3 4 1 - 4 0 2 , Bologna, 1 9 7 0 . G-D. L U D D E N , M. O K L M U R A , A N D K. Y A N O . A totally real surface in C P that is not totally geodesic, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 3 ( 1 9 7 5 ) , 1 8 6 - 1 9 0 . M. S. N A R A S I M H A N , Vector bundles on compact Riemann surfaces, in "Complex Analysis and Its Applications," Inter. Centre Theo. Physics, 1 9 7 5 ; Vol. I I I . pp. 6 3 - 8 8 , P-F. LEUNG,
1
1976. 41.
S.
The Gauss map of Kahier immersions, Tohoku Math. J.
NISHIKAWA.
27
(1975),
4 5 3 ^ 1 6 0 . 4 2 .
43.
M. O B A T A . The Gauss map of immersions of Riemannian manifolds in spaces of constant curvature, J. Differenlial Geom. 2 ( 1 9 6 8 ) , 2 1 7 - 2 2 3 . B. O ' N E I L L . The fundamental equations of a submersion, Michigan Math. J. 13 ( 1 9 6 6 ) , 4 5 9 ^ 1 7 0 .
44.
4 5 .
H. R U N D . Variational problems and Backlund transformations associated with the sineGordon and Korteweg-deVries equations and their extensions. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 5 1 5 , Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, pp. 1 1 9 - 2 2 6 , 1 9 7 6 . J . S A C K S A N D K . U H L E N B E C K , The existence or minimal immersions or the two-sphere.
AIM. 46.
W.
of Math.
22
Math.
(2)
113
(1981),
1-24.
Variation of Hodge structure: Singularities or the period mapping. Invent.
SCHMID.
(1973),
2 1 1 - 3 1 9 .
G. S E M P L E A N D L . R O T H . "Introduction to Algebraic Geometry," Oxford Univ. Press (Clarendon). London/New York, 1 9 4 9 . 4 8 . Y.-T. Siu A N D S.-T. Y A U . Compact Kahier manifolds of positive bisectional curvature. 47.
J.
Invent. Math. 59
(1980),
1 8 9 - 2 0 4 .
4 9 . Y . - T . Stu, Some remarks on the complex analyticity of harmonic maps, Southeast Asian Bull. Math.
3
(1979),
2 4 0 - 2 5 3 .
5 0 . Y . - T . Stu, The complex-analyticity of harmonic maps and the strong rigidity of compact Kahier manifolds. Am. of Math. 1 1 2 ( 1 9 8 0 ) , 7 3 - 1 1 1 . 51. R. T. S M I T H . "Harmonic Mappings of Spheres," Thesis. Univ. of Warwick. 1 9 7 2 ; Amer. J. Math. 52.
R . Soc.
53.
54.
55. 56.
57.
T.
9 7
SMITH,
4 7
(1975),
3 6 4 - 3 8 5 .
The second variation formula for harmonic mappings. Proc. Amer. Math.
(1975),
2 2 9 - 2 3 6 .
O. S U Z U K I . Theorems on holomorphic bisectional curvature and pseudoconvexity on Kahier manifolds, in "Anal, Functions," Kozubnik, 1 9 7 9 ; Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 7 9 8 , Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, pp. 4 1 2 - J 2 8 , 1 9 8 0 . O. S U Z U K I , Pseudoconvexity and holomorphic bisectional curvature on Kahier manifolds, preprint. K. U H L E N B E C K . Minimal 2-spheres and tori in S*. preprint, 1 9 7 5 . K. U H L E N B E C K , Equivariant harmonic maps into spheres, in "Proceedings, Tulane Conf. on Harmonic Maps,'' 1 9 8 1 ; Lecture Notes in Mathematics. No. 9 4 9 , Springer-Verlag. Berlin/New York, pp. 1 4 6 - 1 5 8 , 1 9 8 1 . J . C. W O O D , Harmonic maps and complex analysis, "Proceedings. Summer Course in Complex Analysis." Vol. Ill, pp. 2 8 9 - 3 0 8 , Trieste, 1 9 7 6 .
226 HARMONIC MAPS
263
58. J. C. W O O D . Holomorphicity of certain harmonic maps from a surface to complex projective H-space, J. London Malh. Soc. 20 (1979), 137-142. 59. J . C. W O O D , On the holomorphicity of harmonic maps from a surface, in "Global Differential Geometry and Global Analysis, Proceedings," Berlin, 1979; Springer Lecture Notes, No. 838, Berlin/New York, 1981. 60. J . C . W O O D , Conformality and holomorphicity of certain harmonic maps, preprint, Univ. of Leeds, 1981. 61. H. H. Wu, The equidistribution theory of holomorphic curves, Ann. of Math. Slud. 64 (1970). 62. D. B U R N S . Harmonic maps from C P to CP", in "Harmonic Maps," Proceedings, New Orleans, 1980; Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 949, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, pp. 48-56, 1982. 63. R . C A T E N A C C I . M. C O R N A L B A . A N D C . R E I N A , Classical solutions of CP" model: An algebraic geometrical description, preprint; Univ. di Pavia, 1982. 64. S.-S. C H E R N A N D J. G. W O L F S O N . Minimal surfaces by moving frames, preprint. 65. S. E R O E M A N D J . C. W O O D . On the construction of harmonic maps into a Grassmannian. J. London Math. Soc. (1983) (in press). 66. 1. H, R A W N S L E Y , Notes on homogeneous spaces, preprint; Univ. of Warwick. 1982. 1
227
Mathematische zeitschrift
Math. Z. 185, 517-519 (1984)
© Springer-Verlag 1984
Examples of Harmonic Maps from Disks to Hemispheres 1
James Eells and Luc Lemaire 1
2
Department of Mathematics. University of Warwick. Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom Universite Libre de Bruxelles. Campus Plaine C P.218, Bd du Triomphe, 1050 Bruxelles. Belgium
2
m
Consider the following Dirichlet problem for harmonic maps: Let B be the flat m-disk of radius 1 and S c S " an equatorial hypersphere of the unit Euclidean /t-sphere S". Let v: 8B = S -'-+S be a smooth map. Does (here exist a harmonic map u: 2P"-*S" extending vl We have an affirmative answer for m = l (an elementary property of geodesies), for m = 2 (a theorem of Morrey) and for 3 ^ m ^ 6 , as recently shown in [4] and [8]. In case m = n and v. dB -*S ~' is the identity map, such solutions were first obtained for 3 ^ m ^ 6 in [6]. In contrast, Baldes has shown in [2] that for m £ 7 there is no harmonic extension of the identity map v: dB -"S""" . That is the first example of smooth Dirichlet data for maps between compact manifolds admitting a smooth extension, but no harmonic extension. This might give the impression that for m £ 7 , a closed half sphere in the range is an obstruction to the existence of a surjective harmonic map from a flat domain (with or without boundary) to a manifold. However, we shall observe in particular that there is a smooth map v of topological degree one from S to S which admits a harmonic extension v: B - » S . More precisely, we remark that the methods of [6] and [2] can be applied to produce the following assertion: 0 _ l
m
m
m
n_
1
m
m
1
7
1
8
m
8
_1
Let v. 3B —fS" be a k-homogeneous harmonic polynomial map (i.e., v is the restriction of a map IR" — IR" whose n components are harmonic polynomials homogeneous of degree k). Then 1
- if m
i? admits a harmonic extension;
- if m>c, v does not admit such an extension. In fact, for m
228 5IS
1. Eells and L. Lemaire
The proof follows by observing that a suspension of v of the form (r, 8)-*(R(r), 0(0)}, with r and R denoting radial coordinates, 9edB , <9eS" and 0(f?) = if(0) is a harmonic map if and only if, setting r—ef , u satisfies the pendulum equation m
_1
:
with R ( - o o } = 0 and R(0)=^. That pendulum has constant damping m — 2 and constant gravity e = k{m + k —2)/2= the constant energy density of v; see [9], [1], [10]. As in [6]. a solution exists if and only if (m — 2 ) < 8 e „ ; i.e. if and only if m<2 + 2(l+]/2)k. Similarly, Baldes'argument [2] gives the non-existence assertion. v
2
Added in proof. The existence of harmonic extensions of harmonic polynomial maps was also known to J.C. Wood. When fc=l, v is necessarily the identity map with m = n {up to isometry), and we are reduced to the above mentioned results. On the other hand, for any m the degree k can be made arbitrarily large (in particular so that >n
m
i
m
In general, we do not have control of the dimension n of the image, which increases rapidly with k. However, there is a reasonable supply of homogeneous harmonic polynomial maps [3, §8], in particular those v: S ~ - t S " arising as the gradients of the isoparametric functions of E. Cartan. Several of those have non zero Brouwer degree. In particular, there is a polynomial harmonic map II; S - » S of polynomial degree k — 5 and Brouwer degree 1, which admits a harmonic extension u: B -*S . This map was obtained in [7] and the calculation of its Brouwer degree was kindly provided to us by Hermann Karcher. m
7
}
1 - 1
7
8
S
7
7
Thus we observe that the identity map from S to S doesn't admit any harmonic extension, whereas a more complicated map homotopic to it does. Note that the latter is almost everywhere five to one; and one could ask whether there would be no harmonic extension when v is a diffeomorphism. in [9], Smith established the existence of a harmonic map S - » S ( m £ 7 ) of each Brouwer degree k by taking the join of the identity map on S ~ with the /.-fold rotation of S Replacing in his construction the identity by the above map on S , we note that each homotopy class of maps S - > S has a harmonic representative. m
m
m
2
1
7
9
9
References 1. Baird. P.: Harmonic maps with symmetry, harmonic morphisms, and deformations or metrics. Research Notes in Math. Pitman 1983 2. Baldes, A.: Stability and uniqueness properties of the equator map from a ball into an ellipsoid. Math. Z. 185. 505-516 (1984)
229 Examples of Harmonic Maps from Disks to Hemispheres
519
3. Eells, J.. Lemaire, L.: A report on harmonic maps. Bull. London Math. Soc. 10, 1-68 (1978) 4. Giaquinta, M., SouOek. J.: Harmonic maps into a hemisphere. Preprint. 5. Guisti. E., Miranda, M.: Un essempio di soluzioni per un problcma di minimo relativo ad un integrale regolare del calcolo delle variazioni. Bol. Un. Mat. [tat 4, 1-8 (1968) 6. Jager, W., Kaul, H.: Rotationally symmetric harmonic maps from a ball into a sphere and the regularity problem tor weak solutions of elliptic systems. S. Reine Angew. Math. 343. 146-161 (1983) 7. Takagi. R.. Takahashi. T.: On the principal curvatures of homogeneous hypersurfaces in a sphere. Dill. Geom. in honour K. Yano, Tokyo (1972), pp. 469-481 8. Schoen. R., Uhlenbeck, K.: Regularity of minimizing harmonic maps into the sphere. Preprint 9. Smith. R.T.: Harmonic mappings of spheres. Amer. J. Math. 97, 364-385 (1975) 10. Wood, J.C.: Non-existence of solutions to certain Dirichlet problems for harmonic maps I. Preprint During the preparation of this note, the first-named author was on a Mission Scientifique du Fonds National Beige de la Recherche Scientifique. Received July 29. 1983; received in final form September 14, 1983
230
VARIATIONAL THEORY IN F I B R E BUNDLES
J.
Eells
Mathematics
I.
I EXAMPLES
Institute,
U n i v e r s i t y of
Warwick.
GENERAL REMARKS Nature i s uncompromisingly
efficient.
T h a t a r t i c l e of
has shaped much of our p h y s i c a l and geometric
t h i n k i n g ; and any
m a t h e m a t i c a l or p h y s i c a l model of Nature must d i s p l a y its
essential
guidelines
features.
Indeed,
i n t o sound mathematical
l e d to one of our most powerful The main purpose ( 1 ) To r e c a l l as g i v e n i n (2)
development of
t o o l s : The variational
general
prominently
t h e o r y has - i n l a r g e
of my l e c t u r e
a reasonable
today i s
such
measureprinciple.
two-foldr
context for v a r i a t i o n a l
to i l l u s t r a t e
that context with s e v e r a l
are v a r i o u s l y i n t e r r e l a t e d ,
and i n t h e i r mathematical
examples. both i n t h e i r p h y s i c a l
properties.
(For instance,
i s a p o p u l a r analogy between the v a r i a t i o n a l p r i n c i p l e s of Mills fields
over A - d i m e n s i o n a l m a n i f o l d s
of harmonic maps of 4 bis
theory,
(5);
These examples origins
systematic
faith
surfaces
Yang-
(Example 3 below)
(the s o - c a l l e d
c h i r a l models;
there
and Example
below).)
Consequently unified
it
is especially
enlightening
to view them i n a
framework.
For a s t a r t
: What are the optional
maps $ : M * N between
M. Cahen etal (eds.), Differential Geometry and Mathematical Physics. 149-158. Copyright © 1983 by D. Reidel Publishing Company.
149
231 two spaces
?
In order to have a s i g n i f i c a n t problem, we should specify (a) a prescribed c l a s s 5 of maps. E . g . , a homotopy c l a s s
(i.e.,
a component of the space C° (M,N) of a l l continuous maps M * N); a cobordism c l a s s ; an embedding c l a s s : (b)
a function F : S - ' I whose c r i t i c a l points are the best maps.
In p a r t i c u l a r , we should provide a s u i t a b l e d e f i n i t i o n of point.
critical
And of course we would l i k e to insure that F has a c r i t i c a l
point in S . C e r t a i n l y both F and S should be firmly conditioned by further structures on M,N. I n the present context we s h a l l require that they be smooth manifolds, and endowed with various t e n s o r i a l structures; e.g.,
smooth volume forms, Riemannian metrics; complex,
symplectic, contact s t r u c t u r e s .
I I . THE FRAMEWORK. Let Y : W •* M be a smooth f i b r e bundle. The k - j e t s of sections of y defined in a neighborhood of a point x £ M (= equivalence classes of germs l
of sections at x, having the same d i f f e r e n t i a l s d (ji(x) for 0 ^ i
k) form a smooth manifold J (Y) , and we have the natural
fibre bundle maps k
k
J ( Y ) •* J ~ ' ( Y ) - * . . . • * J°(Y) = W •* M. k v Let C (Y) denote the space of C - s e c t i o n s of y (possibly v o i d ) . K
(j
Then | £ C (Y) determines a section k
j ($)
: M*
k
J
which assigns to each point x £ M the k - j e t j th A k— order f
variational
density
($) of 0) . x
( or Lagrangian)
on y i s a function
k
: J ( y ) * JR-
Choose a space S ( y ) of k - d i f f e r e n t i a b l e sections of Y . And f i x a smooth p o s i t i v e f i n i t e measure v on M. Define the functional ISO
232 F by
: S(-f) -+ B
mm
k
=
f(j (
x M
Now, we have the n o t i o n of minimum point t h a t s h o u l d be a d m i t t e d as a c r i t i c a l duce a topology on S(Y) (a)
the n o t i o n of
point.
Secondly,
and
i f we i n t r o -
then we have
l o c a l minimum of F i n S ( Y ) ;
(b) components of S ( y ) .
That i s
i m p o r t a n t , f o r we can a l s o a s k
whether each component c o n t a i n s a c r i t i c a l we have W e i e r s t r a s s ' Theorem: I f F : continuous,
of F in S ( y ) ,
point.
Furthermore,
S ( y ) * ]R i s lower s e m i -
then F a c h i e v e s a minimum on each compact s u b s e t
of
S(y). Remark. The i n t e r p l a y between c o n t i n u i t y p r o p e r t i e s of F and compactness
i n S(Y) i s one of
the primary problems of c l a s s i c a l
c a l c u l u s of v a r i a t i o n s . F o r i n s t a n c e ,
i f S(Y) i s a H i l b e r t
w i t h i t s weak topology and F i s the norm on S ( y ) ( 1 ) F i s weakly lower
space
then
semi-continuous;
( 2 ) c l o s e d bounded s u b s e t s of S(Y) a r e compact. I won't p u r s u e t h a t l i n e of development inadequate f o r many of For i n s t a n c e ,
n-sphere
here,
it
is
the v a r i a t i o n a l problems we w i s h to
i n Example 4 b i s below, if either
(n > 3) with arty metric,
consider.
M or K is art
then any harmonic map $ ; M •* N
which is a minimum of E in i t s homotopy class map.
for
must be a
constant
Thus many components w i l l be w i t h o u t minima of E . An a c c e p t a b l e n o t i o n of c r i t i c a l
the f o l l o w i n g
point ^
+
of F : S(Y)
B
is
:
F o r any germs of
1-parameter deformations(<|J ) t
c
w
S ( y ) of
require dF(
Then under m i l d r e g u l a r i t y h y p o t h e s e s ,
t h a t c o n d i t i o n becomes the
Euler-Lagrange equation a s s o c i a t e d with F . I n c h a r t s that
latter
t a k e s the form
151
233
t
(-1)
(f
Remark. the
) i 0 at
ax"
|a|
different
v e r s i o n of our b a s i c frame-work i s
following: A k
order
t h
variational
density
on y i s a f i b r e - p r e s e r v i n g
map K
J (Y)
*
FC
(M)
A V
M
'
The Euler-Lagrange operator £ of f a s s i g n s to each l o c a l s e c t i o n . 2k * $ an m-form £ ( j rji) on M w i t h v a l u e s i n T (W) ; more p r e c i s e l y , . 2k S(j <Ji) a s s i g n s to x £ M an m-form on W which i s b a s i c and has
ft
T (W) v a l u e s . F o r any compact o r i e n t e d domain d_ dt A critical
t
J
K
&fi
0
*t
A) C—-)
0
-2k, i s a s e c t i o n $ such t h a t S ( j
point 2
d
2k
k
f(3 * ) 0
G M
(V)
*
T*(W)
®
- 0 :
A V ( M )
M Thus TTI H
C(J
2 k
Y)
- C(T*(W)
A
T (M))
i N 2
C(W) t
d i s p l a y s £ as a 2 k ' Remark. A g a i n , the
1
o r d e r d i f e r e n t i a l o p e r a t o r on
i n t e r p l a y between
of F and the s t r u c t u r e of S(y)
the
can
m e t r i c . I n some f a v o u r a b l e s i t u a t i o n s
+
B
i s a smooth f u n c t i o n .
p o i n t s of F a r e t h o s e A
152
of S ( Y ) w i t h r e s p e c t
instance,
I n such c a s e s
f o r which the d i f f e r e n t i a l
see Examples 1 and 4 b i s
below.)
the
to S(y)
be endowed w i t h a smooth m a n i f o l d s t r u c t u r e w i t h r e s p e c t
which F : S ( y )
(For
structure
i s a p r i m a r y problem - the a r t of
the m a t t e r ! We s h o u l d have completeness a c a n o n i c a l l y defined
y.
(differentiable)
to
critical
dF (
234 I I I . EXAMPLES. Examples 1. Suppose that y : M + M i s a Riemannian vector bundle over a compact Riemannian manifold. Let A be a l i n e a r k— order e l l i p t i c d i f f e r e n t i a l operator on sections of W (with values i n 2
some other Riemannian vector bundle over M). Define S(y) = t . ( y ) , the Sobolev space of sections whose d i f f e r e n t i a l s of order < k k 1 i 12 are square integrable. Let i W = 7f\ (fc0 (l«?J| . so :
x
F(
2
|(A(f)( )| v , X
JM
G
where V i s the volume element of the Riemannian metric g on M. S Then 2
F : £ ( y ) -+B 2
i s weakly lower semi-continuous on the H i l b e r t space £, ( y ) . I t s ir
ir
k
Euler-Lagrange equation i s A A ( t » • 0, where A denotes the 2
L -adjoint of A. The extremals
of F are the sections
in the kernel
of A . Example 2 . Let TI : P •*• M be a p r i n c i p a l G-bundle, where G i s a L i e group. I f L(G) denotes the L i e algebra of G and we l e t G act on i t by the adjoint action, then we can form L(P) = P* L ( G ) . Now G G also acts on the tangent vector bundle T ( P ) , and we have the following exact sequence of vector bundles 0 * L(P) ->- T(P)/G * T(M) -+ 0; see ( 1 , 9 ) . The connexions on the p r i n c i p a l bundle u can be charac¬ terised as the 1-forras w e C(T (M) ® T(P)/G) such that TT o w = I , •a
the identity operator ( I £ C(T (M) 0 T(M)). We denote the L i e W
w
d i f f e r e n t i a l of w by D ; therefore the curvature of w i s D ( w ) / 2 . Relative to suitable Riemannian structures we can define the 2 w
v a r i a t i o n a l density f ( j ' w ) = -j llD (w) II Take 5(y) y- -:C W , ( Y=) . T°(M) The extremals of M. ® T(P)/G •*
2
on the vector bundle
2 w
2
F(w)1 = \ IID (w) I I v ~" 'M the Yang-Mills fields of TT : P •+• M. 2
are
153
235 +
Example 3. Suppose Chat M i s compact and oriented. Let GL (M) -* M denote i t s p r i n c i p a l bundle of oriented frames. Let m = dim L , and +
•Y : W = GL (M)/SO(m) •* M the associated bundle whose fibre i s the homogeneous space GL (JR )/SO(m). The sections of y are the Riemannian metrics g on m
H. Let S(y) denote the space of a l l g such that v
= 1.
of correct Sobolev c l a s s (dictated by the functional F
q
below).
For any g £ S(y) l e t 2
R
2
: A T(M) + A T(M) S be the associated curvature operator. Take any symmetric function Gf :
T N ( M E
1
" ^"'
-+ JR and define F ^
=
F (g) o
o(R
8
)v
: S(v) * JR by
g
where 0(R ) : M •* K assigns to each point of M the O-function of 8 the eigenvalues of R . g An i n t e r e s t i n g s p e c i a l case occurs i f m •? 3. Taking for o the first density
elementary of F
cal points
Q
symmetric function
becomes the total
are just
the Einstein
Hilbert ( 7 ) ; see also (3, 8,
curvature metrics
O j , then the function, on
variational
and i t s
criti-
M. (Theorem of
10)).
Example 4. Let M,N be compact Riemannian manifolds and y : M x N = W-*-Mbe projection on the f i r s t factor. We can ident i f y the sections of y with the maps $ : M •+ N. For any k > I l e t T . (H) * M denote the vector bundle of k— order tangent vectors Ik) on M (see ( 1 1 ) ) ; thus l o c a l sections of T ^ j (M) have representations in charts of M of the form L
i i,~ |a|^k
a
ct - a dx
.
A smooth map (J> : M -+ N induces a l i n e a r bundle map (the differential
154
of
236
V)
T
= G0
(M)
-
T
W
W
-
The g i v e n Riemannian m e t r i c s on M,N n a t u r a l l y induce Riemannian m e t r i c s on T (M),T, ( N ) . Thus i f r . . denotes the f i b r e dimen(k) (k) r / i , \ k** s i o n of T . . . (M) and ff i l * B i s a symmetric f u n c t i o n , then (k) ^ the f u n c t i o n x •* 0(1)1. . o 4 > . , . ) ( x ) , w h i c h a s s i g n s to e a c h x G M (.k) (kj ^ the O - f u n c t i o n of t h e e i g e n v a l u e s of the endomorphism ,0 if, . , th is a k S(y)
order v a r i a t i o n a l d e n s i t y .
As i n Example 3 , we choose
to f i t w e l l w i t h t h e f u n c t i o n a l E ^ : $(y) •* E d e f i n e d by zW
-
a
0 ( H
**k)*(k)>
Y
Example 4 b i s . I n example 4 l e t u s take k = 1 a n d o = O j / 2 , where Oj i s t h e f i r s t e l e m e n t a r y symmetric f u n c t i o n of m v a r i a b l e s (m - dim M ) . Then a
1
o(<J>(1J°
1
1
12
= jl" *^) I ,
2 1/2 the H i l b e r t - S c h m i d t norm of the d i f f e r e n t i a l
dfCx)
: T (M) •* T . ( N ) . Then E , ( i » = E((J>) i s the energy of if. x tptxj Oj/z I t s E u l e r - L a g r a n g e e q u a t i o n i s the s e m i - l i n e a r e l l i p t i c system T r a c e (Vdd>) = d i v ( d $ ) g
and the c r i t i c a l p o i n t s
= 0;
of t h e energy a r e c a l l e d harmonic maps.
the c h o i c e of S(y) i s not a s i m p l e m a t t e r .
In general
s p e c i a l c a s e of energy the fundamental r e g u l a r i t y theorem
I n the (6,3.5))
2
s u g g e s t s t a k i n g S(y) = £ {(y) ft C ° ( y ) . With t h a t
choice
( 1 ) S ( y ) is a smooth Banach manifold structure. Burstall,
uith
complete
Finsler
( D e t a i l s of t h a t r e s u l t have been s u p p l i e d by F . E . Warwick T h e s i s ( i n p r e p a r a t i o n ) . )
(2) E : S ( y ) •*. IR is a smooth function. differentiable
sense)
are just
M •# N, of the class
i
2
Its critical
points
(in the
the harmonic maps.
(3) The components of $(y) are just
Remark.
natural
the homotopy classes
of maps
fl C ° .
I n Examples 4 and 4 b i s i t i s not d i f f i c u l t
to r e p l a c e t h e
product bundle y : M * N * M by an a r b i t r a r y Riemannian f i b r e
bundle
y : W •* M. A s e c t i o n $ of y h a s d i f f e r e n t i a l which decomposes
into 1S5
237 horizontal
and v e r t i c a l p a r t s
: d<|> = (dtfi)
+ (d$) , f o l l o w i n g
v e c t o r bundle d e c o m p o s i t i o n of T ( W ) ; and we c a n c o n s t r u c t V t i e s o f (d((i) . I n p a r t i c u l a r , t h e e x t r e m a l s o f the energy
a r e t h e harmonic sections
the
o-densifunctional
of y . T h e i r study h a s been u n d e r t a k e n
by C . M. Wood a t Warwick. Example 5 . L e t Y : M x N = W -* M be a s i n Example 4 , so t h a t we again identify
sections
Let A > . . . > X r
of Y w i t h maps $ : M -»• N.
> 0 be the p o s i t i v e 1/2 =
eigenvalues
of $
.o$...(x)
a t a g i v e n p o i n t ; and s e t
Then f o r any r e a l number p > 1 we have the norm
id*(x)H(p) = a u\)
Up
,
w h i c h f o r p = 2 r e d u c e s to the H i l b e r t - S c h m i d t norm of Example 4 bis.
Then o f c o u r s e we c a n d e f i n e
and s t u d y i t s e x t r e m a . R e g u l a r i t y t h e o r y f o r s u c h i n t e g r a l problems seems to be s u b s t a n t i a l l y more s u b t l e and d i f f i c u l t c a s e p = 2 . However, the S(Y)
is
=
space
£\ n C°
again a complete Particularly
than f o r t h e
smooth Finsler
manifold
of maps.
i m p o r t a n t i s the c a s e p = dim M = m; t h e n E . . \X j
h a s c o n f o r m a l i n v a r i a n c e p r o p e r t i e s . That c a s e h a s been by K . U h l e n b e c k , who has e s t a b l i s h e d some e x i s t e n c e which a r e b o t h p r o m i s i n g f o r f u t u r e d e v e l o p m e n t s ,
studied
theorems,
and c a u t i o n a r y
a g a i n s t o v e r - o p t i m i s m c o n c e r n i n g r e g u l a r i t y . See ( 1 3 , 14, 1 2 ) . Example 5 b i s . T a k i n g p = ™ i n Example 5, we o b t a i n id
( e o )
define
( $ ) = sup{Hd(f»Cx)ll
i s t h e Dehming o f O l i v i e r .
( c o )
: x e M).
I t h a s been s t u d i e d i n d e t a i l i n
the c a s e o f maps between E u c l i d e a n s p h e r e s ; but c e r t a i n l y d e s e r v e s
156
238 general
consideration,
as
well.
See
(15),
and
the
references
therein, Example 6. set
L e t K and L be
A = © L , the
map 6: For as
symmetric
K * K •* L s h a l l
a symmetric the
fundamental
of
(6,S3).
the
tensor
dimensional
algebra
considered
a map i)> : M •* N a s
2
f t
bilinear '• K x K -»• A .
a map 6
of
6
(as
o(S)
elements of
i n Example 4 b i s ,
e
A
A).
its
second
And we c a n a p p l y field
_ 1
C(© T (M)
a((i<|>).
®
the
rators
are
in
fact
further
e.g.,
0^(6$).
look
many e n t i c i n g comment
at
at
Certain
the
obtain
a n d N = JR. we
of
these
associated
case
mysteries-about
this
to
t a k i n g O" = O
Euler-Lagrange operators
principles;
presents
above c o n s t r u c t i o n
In particular,
Monge-Ampere operator
make no
such
and
form
the
theory
spaces
L . A symmetric as
eigenvalues
obtain
variational
of
vector
a :A x . . . * A * A we c a n d e f i n e
the
6* = Vdd> 6 see
be
function
a-function
Now g i v e n
finite
m = 2.
ope-
with This
w h i c h we
general
reluctantly
time.
REFERENCES (
1) M. F . A t i y a h , Trans.
( 2)
Amer. Math.
M. F . A t i y a h , Self-duality Proc.
( 3)
Complex
Roy.
M. B e r g e r ,
N. in
Soc.
( 4)
J . Eells
85
connections
(1957),
L o n d o n A 362 formules
Ann. E . N . S .
3
A n n . J . M a t h . 86
J . Eells
and J . H . Sampson,
bundles.
Proc.
in
fibre
bundles.
181-207.
and I . M .
four-dimensional
and J . H . Sampson,
manifolds. ( 5)
Soc.
J . Hitchin,
Quelques
riemannienne.
analytic
Singer,
Riemannian
(1978),
425-461.
de v a r i a t i o n (1970),
geometry.
pour une
285-294.
Harmonic mappings (1964),
of
Riemannian
109-160.
V a r i a t i o n a l theory
U . S . - J a p a n Sem. D i f f .
structure
Geometry.
in
fibre
Kyoto,
(1965),
22-33. (
6)
J . Eells Bull.
and L . L e m a i r e , A r e p o r t
London Math.
Soc.
10
(1978),
on h a r m o n i c
maps.
1-68.
157
239 ( 7) D. H i l b e r t , Die Grundlagen der Physik, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. GtJttingen (1915), 395-407; (1917), And Math. Ann. 92 (1924),
53-76.
1-32.
( 8) Y. Muto , C r i t i c a l Riemannian m e t r i c s . Tensor N.S. 29 (1975),
125-133.
( 9) H. K. Nickerson, On d i f f e r e n t i a l operators and connections. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 99 (1961), 509-539. (10) E . M. Patterson, A c l a s s of c r i t i c a l Riemannian metrics. Univ. Aberdeen (1980). (11) W. F . Pohl, D i f f e r e n t i a l geometry of higher order. Topology 1 (1962) , 169-21 1 . (12) K. Suominen, Quasiconformal maps in manifolds. Ann. Acad. Fenn. 1966. No. 393. IT
(13) K. Uhlenbeck, Minimal 2-spheres and t o r i in S . Preprint
(1975).
(14) K. Uhlenbeck, Equivariant harmonic maps into spheres. Proc. Tulane Conf. Harmonic Maps. (1981). (15) H. Hefter, Dehiumgsuntersuchungen an Abbildungen von Spha'ren auf Spharen. Bonn (1980).
158
240 Serie I — 685
C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, t. 296 (25 avril 1983)
GEOMETRIE D I F F E R E N T I E L L E . - Constructions twistorieltes des applications harmoniques. Note (*) de James Eells ei Simon Salamon, presentee par Andre Lichnerowicz, Les applications harmoniques conformcs d'une surface de Riemann dans une variete riemannienne sont parametrisees par des applications holomorphes (convenablemeni defimes) dana un espace twistoriel. DIFFERENTIAL
GEOMETRY
- Twislorial Constructions of Harmonic Maps
Conjormut harmonic maps uj u Riemann sinjuu' into u Riemannian niuiiijoht vie paramcinzcd by Minubly defined holomorphic maps into a Iwistor space.
1. L'ESPACE TWISTOKIEL. — Soil N une variete riemannienne orientee de dimension 4. Son espace iwisioriel des structures complexes est 1'espace fibre associe n : Z -* N decrit comme suit [I] ; En identifiant les fibres vectoriels A TN =s A T * N de 2-vecteurs et 2-covecteurs, on obtient une decomposition spectrale A TN = A TN@Ai TN, les sous-espaces etant associes aux valeurs propres ± 1 de l'operateur* de Hodge. On note Z =S A . TN, le fibre des vecteurs de norme 1 du fibre vectoriel A TN. Chaque point z e Z = Z , est une structure complexe sur 1'espace tangent T„ N; celle-ci et la structure complexe canonique de la fibre enr( = C P ' ) determinent une structure presque complexe J! sur Z, en utilisant sa connexion riemannienne. On remarque que J ! = ( J , J ) , ou la composante horizontale J„ est donnee par z eleveaT,Z; la composante verticale J est la structure complexe de la fibre tangente en z. II est bien connu que J, est integrable si el seulemeni si N est anti-auloduale (c'esl-a-dire que la composante W du tenseur de la courbure de Weyl est 0). Nous avons besoin d'une autre structure presque complexe J sur Z : celle donnee par J = ( J , —J ) dans la notation ci-dessus. !
2
2
2
2
±
2
( I I
H
v
v
+
2
2
H
u
PROPRIETES. — (i) J n'est jamais integrable. (ii) La forme de Kahier
(<&>)*•*—0; pourvit que N soit anti-autoduale et d'Einstein. (iii) La premiere classe de Chern c, (Z, J ) = 0. 2
L E THEOREME. — Solent M une surface de Riemann et tp : M -> N une application conforme. [On pourrait admettre des points xeM lels que d
(2)
2
2
J
i = AW
II est evident que n.tp = qj. Rappelons qu'une application tp : M — N est harmonique si eile est un poini critique de I'energie : E) JM
11% IP,
241 686 — Serie I
C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, t. 296 (25 avril 1983)
L a fonctionnelle E est un invariant de la structure conforme de M ; et les applications harmoniques conformes ne sont autres que les immersions conformes minimales [2]. Nous exclurons les applications constantes dans N (resp., verticales dans Z ) — une fois pour loutes. THEOREME. — La correspondance tp —* (p est une bijection enire les applications harmoniques conformes tp : M -> N et les applications i -holomorphes
L a propriete(ii)impliquequ'uneapplication J -ho]omorpheest harmoniquesi Nest antiautoduale et d'Einstein [3]. 2
3. REMARQUES SUR LA DEMONSTRATION. — L'inspiration decoule de la theorie des surfaces minimales dans U , due a Weierstrass; voir 1'exemple 5 ci-dessous. 1
Etant donne tp : M -* N , nous decomposons le fibre complexifie (
C
2
0
1
=T
1 ,
0
°@T '
1
2
A' (
(3)
V tp 6 T I T * M Cg) tp" A i T N ) .
Sa (2, 0)-composante q = ( V ( p )
2 0
o
admet la decomposition q = qj + r\ -
u
2
z
n , e T ( A - ° ® A' ° M )
et
r\ e T ( A 1
2 , 0
0
® A ' ' M).
Supposons que
si et settlement si tp est
1
harmonique.
(iii) q =Qsiet seulement si tp est horizontalepar rapport a la connection riemannienne sur Z. Reciproquement, etant donnee une application J -holomorphe i|i : M -» Z , on voit que la 2
composition
r
Ces deraieres applications sont dites « superminimals » par Bryant [4]. 2
Exemple. - Les applications harmoniques isotropes tp : M -* S" (resp., C P ) out ete parametrisees par des applications holomorphes; voir[5\ el [6] (resp., [7]). Les applications harmoniques S -* S sont forcement isotropes. Bryant a utilise q> pour construire des immersions minimales des surfaces de Riemann compactes dans S 2
4
+
J
5. APPLICATIONS DE GAUSS. — L'espace twistoriel Z d'un tore plat T est la variete de Blanchard [Ij; en particulier, J ! esl integrable. De plus, (Z. J ) satisfait (1). II y a une application fibree p : Z - > C P qui est J , holomorphe el J -antiholomorphe; comme fibre reel, e'est tin produit riemannien. 1
2
1
±
2
Soit tp : M -» T * une application harmonique conforme. Alors son application de Gauss y , : M - > S + x S - (quadrique complexe) esl anti-holomorphe [8]; on peut ecrire ; 0
(4)
y =(pnip, , p°(p-). 9
242 C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, t. 296 (25 avril 1983)
Serie I — 687
Une construction analogue peut etre lake si N est une variete de type K3 et Ricci-plate. II y a 4
aussi une construction comparable pour des immersions minimales de M dans S , dont les images sont contenues dans S
3
6. G E N E R A L I S A T I O N S . — (i) Soit N une variete kahlerienne quaternionique (c'est-a-dire une variete riemannienne de dimension 4 it dont le groupe d'hoionomie est contenu dans le sous-groupe Sp(n)Sp(l) de S O ( 4 « ) ) . 4 n
Exemples. — Toutes les varietes riemanniennes orientees de dimension 4. L'espace projectif quaternionique. L a grassmannienne G ( C ) des sous-espaces complexes de dimension 2 dans C" 2
4
Une telle variete possede un fibre twistoriel ?t : Z -* N \ de fibre C P'; el Z esl muni de deux structures presque complexes Ji el J [9j. Ce fibre provient d'un cadre tout a fail nature! pour en regis trer des informations du premier ordre des applications
4 n
2
II y a une correspondance bijective enire les applications harmoniques conformes inclusives M -* N el les applications \ -hoto>norphes M -* Z. 4 n
2
(ii) Nos constructions peuvenl etre modiftces comme suit : Soient N" une n-variete riemannienne orientee et it : Q -» N" le fibre associe dont la fibre est la grassmannienne G ( R " ) des sous-espaces de R" de dimension 2. Chaque espace tangent T , Q conlient un sous-espace F l genere par des vecteurs verticaux et l'espace horizontal q\ ces deux composants determinent deux structures presque complexes J , , J telles que Q esl muni de deux structures partiellement complexes (structures C. R.). En utilisant la notion evidente d'une application holomorphe, on oblient le theoreme du paragraphe 2, en remplacant N (resp., Z) par N" (resp., Q). 2
?
;
(Iii) Nous remarquons que nos methodes sonl applicables egalement aux constructions twistorielles dans lesquelles le contact d'ordre superieur intervient; voir [10] et [7],
(") Remise le I I avril 1983. ( I ] M. F . ATIYAH. N . J. HITCHIN el [. M. SINCER, Proc. Royal Soc. London, $erieA362, 1978. p. 425-461.
[2J J. EELLS ei
J . H . SAMPSON. Amer. j. Math.. 86. 1964. p. 109-160. |3] A. LICHNEROWICZ, Symp. Maih. Ill, 1970, p. 341-402. |4] R . BRYANT, J. Diff. Geom.. 17, 1982. p. 455-473.
[5] E . CALABI. J. Diff. Geom., 1, 1967, p. 111-125.
|6] E . CALABI. Universile de Montreal, 1967. p. 59-81. (7] J . EELLS ei J . C . WOOD. Adv. Math., 1983.
|8] S . S . CttFRN. Diff. amICamh. Top.. Princeton. 1965. p. 187-198 |9| S. S\i wins, tm \l,:ih.. 67. 1'is:. p. M.MTl. |I0| J H. Rwisst n . TienU'i' S/iaett and iMilalph Maps n] Rleiluam Surfaces. Inslilul des Hataes Eludes scientifiques
35. route de Cbarlres. 91440 Bures-sur-Yvelte: Scuola Normale Superiore 56100 Pisa.
243
Removable Singularities of Harmonic Maps J. E E L L S & J. C. POLKING
1. Introduction. A subset A of a Riemannian manifold M is polar if any if-function defined on a domain V C M and harmonic on U \ U fl A is harmonic on U. That notion can be characterized in terms of capacity (see §2), and is thereby seen to be independent of the Riemannian metric on M. With explanations and refinements to follow, we state now the 2
Theorem. Let A be a polar set of M. Let f E. L _ (M ,N) be a map between Riemannian manifolds, weakly harmonic on M\A. Then f is weakly harmonic on M. loc
The result is established in §3, based on methods of Harvey-Polking [HP1J. We also present several situations in which we can apply regularity theory to assert that/is harmonic. In §4 we show how to construct certain harmonic maps with singularities in prescribed nonpolar sets. Section 5 is devoted to a version of the Schwarz reflection principle for harmonic maps, generalizing that given by J . C . Wood in his thesis [W]; our proof is an adaptation of that in [HPT]. We would like to thank L . Lemaire for several comments made during the preparation of this paper, and the National Science Foundation for partial support. Finally we would like to thank the referee for his careful and precise report. The paper is much better as a result of his efforts. 2. Polar sets, capacities, and HausdoriT measures. We shall say that a set A C M is q-polar(l < q < =») if 0 is the only distribution in LL (M) with compact support in A. (That notion coincides with (l,fj)-polar in the terminology of [L], where the concept was first brought to bear on problems of removable singularities.) ij-polar is a concept independent of the Riemannian structure used to define it. Clearly A is <j-polar iff A D U is g-polar for every set U of an open cover of M. Hence g-poiar is a local concept; and it is appropriate to characterize it in Euclidean spaces. Furthermore, a set A is tj-polar iff every compact subset is qpolar. X
a
a
The q-capacity (1 < q < °=) of a compact subset K C R
C {K) = inffUCJ, E Co(R ) for which d>
m
is defined by
q
taking the infimum over ail
m
£ 1 on A'; here
859 Indiana University Mathematics Journal ©, Vol. 33, No. 6 (1984)
||
\\
q A
denotes
244 860
J. EELLS & 1 C. POLKING m
the norm on L1(R ). That notion of capacity is a specialization of a class of capacities introduced in [M, where C (K) is denoted by B, „(K)] and [R]; see also [SI, S2] and | F Z ] . These capacities have been extensively studied; however, we shall need only a few of their properties: f) C is a capacity in the sense of Choquet; in particular, C is countably subadditive. 2) The capacity C is closely related to the standard Wiener capacity of potential theory. For instance, they have the same null sets, so C (K) = 0 if and only if there is a subharmonic function on R" which takes the value -°° precisely on K. Traditionally 2-polar sets are said to be polar. 3) Most important for our purposes is the following characterization—which is a consequence of the equivalent definitions of C which appear in [M], and the theorem in [APj: q
q
2
2
1
q
Theorem.
A compact set K is q-polar if and only if C (K)
= 0.
q
4) We need the following lemma fS2], whose proof we include for convenience: Lemma. Let K C R™ be compact and q-polar (1 < q £ m). There is a sequence {X*} C Co(R ) with 0 < X, s 1 and k = 1 on a neighborhood of K. Furthermore, t|\i||,,i —* 0, and A * - * 0 a.e. m
t
Proof. By the theorem above we have C (K) = 0, so there is a sequence {\ } C Co(R ) with \ ^ 1 on K and 0^ , - » 0. Choose h £ C"fR) with h(t) = 0 for / < 1/4, ft(r)- 1 for / ^ 1/2, and h'(t) > 0 for 1/4 < ( < 1/2. Let At(.i) = h(\ (x)). Then \ = 1 near K, and ||A.*||„J —'0. Finally, we can choose a subsequence, still called { \ } , such that A*—»0 a.e. • q
m
k
k
K
t
k
5) In §4 we shall need the Lemma. Let KqrSm and 1 / p + 1 /q = 1. / / K C R " is compact and C (K) > 0, then dim M0S% = •», where q
p
m
L - (R ) t
K
= fae LW):
support uC
K).
Proof. By the previous theorem and the definition of ij-polarity, it suffices to find infinitely many disjoint compact sets K K , ... in A" such that CXKji > 0 for each j . By induction it suffices to find two such. Now q ^ m insures that C [B(x,r)) -* 0 as r - > 0, (see [M]). Since C {K) > 0, there is a point x G K for which C (K H B(x ,r)) > 0 for all r > 0; for otherwise we could cover K with finitely many balls B(xj;rj) with C [K O B(Xj,rJ)) = 0, and conclude that C (K) = 0. Now C (K D B(x„,r)) -* 0, so there is an r such that 0 < C (K n B(x ,r )) < C (K)/2. Set K, = K D B(x ,r /2), K = K \ B(x ,r ). Clearly QAT,) > 0; and because u
2
q
q
Q
q
0
a
q
q
q
0
0
0 < C {K) q
0
0
0
q
2
< C,(AT 0 BU^))
a
0
+ C , ( A - ) £ C (K)/2 3
q
+ Qf/f,),
245 REMOVABLE SINGULARITIES
we have C (K ) q
^ C (K)/2
2
q
861
> 0.
•
Closely related to capacity is the notion of Hausdorff measure (see [F] for a systematic account): Let
where the inftmum is taken over covers of A by countable families {B } of balls 6, of radius r £ E . Then set t
;
A^A) = limA^(A). d-dimensional Hausdorff measure A (or A ^ ) corresponds to taking 0 £ d £ m and setting d
1\" /
Id + 2
-d
If d is an integer and A a subset of a (/-dimensional C'-submanifold S of R ° , then A (A) is the Lebesgue d-measure of A in S. Clearly AQ is counting measure. In dimension 0 it is sometimes convenient to use another measure, that is defined via the function <po(r) 0°g We set A S •= A . We shall use the following relationship between Hausdorff measures and capacities: d
=
w
m
Proposition. a) IfA - (K) b) lf\„- ^(K)
Suppose that K C R is compact and that 1 < q < m. < », then C (K) = 0. //AJ(tf) < «>, rAcn C (iT) = 0. > Qfor some e > 0, then C (K) > 0.
m q
q
q
m
q
Part a) is proved in [M], and part b) in [AM]. Given a subset A C R , say that A (A) is locally finite if A (A D K) < oo for all compact sets K. That notion, as well as that of A / A ) = 0, is a differential invariant, and consequently makes sense on a smooth manifold. m
d
d
3. Conditions insuring removability. Let M b e a Riemannian manifold of dimension m and metric g. Let N be another, of dimension n and metric h. A m a p / G L _ {M,N) is weakly harmonic if 2
toc
(1)
0=
for all compact variations <j>, where V denotes the appropriate covariant differential and v^ the volume element of the Riemannian metric g on M. Wc say that f is harmonic if it is weakly harmonic and smooth. To simplify coordinate calculations we express ( I ) as follows (see [ E S . Chapter 2] and [H]): Embed N in
246 862
J. EELLS & J. C POLKING
a finite dimensional vector space V. Take an open tubular neighborhood U of N in V; we can assume that U is realized as a Riemannian disc bundle, and that V is endowed with a complete Riemannian metric extending that of U. Then multiplication by - 1 in the fibres of U induces an isometric involution r of U having N as its fixed point set; in particular, N is totally geodesically embedded in U. For any yEN and v e T V we have S
(2)
exp (LV(y)v) = rexp,(v). v
In a chart of M (1) takes the form
0)
0 = - {tfftki
VteCg~dx + J ^ T T ^ / r / ^ V d e t i ^ (1 < y < dim V ) .
Here (g") is the inverse of the matrix (g ), fj = df/dx', is the covariant derivative of <j> in the x'-direction; and (trjQ) is associated to the embedding of N in V. 0
Theorem. Let f E L\ (M,N) be weakly harmonic on M \ A, where ACM is relatively closed a) / / / G Lf (M,N) and A is q-polar (1/p + \/q = 1,2 =2/J =S »), rA<;« / is weakly harmonic on M. If f is continuous on M (e.g., if m < p), then f is harmonic. b) Iff G C^M.N) and A„,_ (A) is locally finite, thenf is harmonic on M. c) / / 0 < a s 1 artd/E C (M,N) and A . (A) - 0, then f is harmonic on M. d) If f E C'(M,N) and A ( A ) Is locally finite, thenf is harmonic on M. e) IfO < a < 1 and f t C'\M,N) and A _ ( A ) = 0, then f is harmonic on M. loc
ilac
2
a
m 1+a
m+i
m
l + a
Taking into account the proposition in §2, we obtain Corollary 1. Let f E Lf (Af,A0 be weakly harmonic on M\A. If 2 ^= p < °° and A _,(A) is locally finite, thenf is weakly harmonic on M. If p — 2 = m and Ajj(A) is locally finite, thenf is weakly harmonic on M. (This is the only case in which A^ intervenes.) JOC
m
Proof of theorem. We shall show that / is weakly harmonic on M for each of the four cases. Harmonicity of / in case / is continuous and weakly harmonic is a consequence of the basic regularity theorem for harmonic maps [ E L I , §3]. Set K = A n support
t
v
0 = | g H(K)j
4 VdcTg dx-
j
(I-
K)g*[fl4>j - *Mtt*M
VStg dx.
Our choice of {X*} insures that the first integral —* 0 as k—* co in part a). Since the square brackets in the second integral enclose an integrable function, and 1 — X —* 1 a.e., it follows that t
247 REMOVABLE SINGULARITIES
0 = |
g"lf7h
-
863
< /?/?+] Vdet^ dx. Q
Consequently / is weakly harmonic in M. For parts b), c), d) and e) we proceed similarly, invoking Lemma 3.2 and the arguments of §4 of [HP], • Taking into account [HKW, Theorem 3], we have Corollary 2. Iff<E L](M,N) is weakly harmonic on M\A and f(M \ A) is contained in some geodesic bail B(b,r) of center b and radius r which does not meet the cut locus of b and for which r < TT/2\/S,
(4)
where B > 0 is an upper bound for the sectional curvatures on B(b,r), harmonic on M.
thenf is
Taking into account [G], we have Corollary 3. If m = 2 and f G L] (M,N) (i.e., (f*h) = 0), then f is harmonic on M. lcc
2
is also weakly conformal on M
0
Remark. Our theorem invites comparison with results on removable singularities of minimal graph systems: Given a m a p / : M -> N, let F:M-> M x N be defined by F(x) = (x,f(x)). The condition that F be a minimal immersion takes the form [E]
X — ify Vdetfc) = 0 i-t ox
(1 < j £ m)
y. — (k'f) Vdetfe) = 0, where k = g + ( / * % . Let M be a domain of R " and / : M \ A - » R" a weak solution of (5) with \ -,(A) - 0. a) If n = 1, then A is removable [B], [DGS], [SI]. b) I f / G C\M,N), then A is removable [HLJ. I f / i s merely Lipschitz then A may not be removable [LO]. 0
0
m
Remark. In the spirit of our theorem, Meier [ M l ] , has shown that if / G L\\ (M \A,N) is weakly hannonic and f(M \A) is contained in some geodesic ball B(b,r) as in Corollary 2, then/ G L](M,N); compare our theorem, part a). He also gives an example in which A is a point, r - i r / 2 V o , and/does not have a weakly harmonic extension across A. Meier applies his theorem to the Gauss map of minimal graph systems, extending results of the preceding remark. Meier also has results on removable singularities for harmonic maps of class If into manifolds with nonpositive sectional curvature (see [M2]). K
4. Harmonic maps with prescribed singularities. In this section we use the implicit function theorem to establish the existence of maps with prescribed sin-
248 864
J. E E L L S & J. C. POLKING
gularities. The construction is analogous to that in [EL2], corresponding to the case where / : M —* N is a harmonic map with no nontrivial Jacobi fields. Throughout we shall suppose that M is compact, perhaps with smooth boundary bM. We assume that N is embedded as in §3, and maintain that notation. Let / : A / - » JVbe harmonic. Forp > m, Lf(M,f7)is open in L (M,V). The harmonic map operator (= tension field) defines a smooth map 0
P
0
P
T-.LftMJU)-*
L -,(M,V);
here T ( / ) = V*df, V* being the adjoint of V in (1); see [EL2]. Since r is an isometry, we have (6)
T(r=/) = Dr(/)T(/).
The differential of T at / is the Jacobi operator Jf, (7)
v
DT(/)cp = 7,(4.) - A i» + Trace
R (df,$)df,
/(
in the notation of [ E L I , §3]. From (6) we see that iif :M^N map, then a
(8) J
fo
is a harmonic
40M/o)) = * M / o W + > . is a formally self-adjoint elliptic operator on the space of variations of/ . If 0
'{<|) G Lf(M,V):r> = 0 on bM} P
L (M,V),
bM ^ 0 bM = 0,
P
then the kernel of J : L (M,V) -* Z,£,(W,V) is the space of Jacobi fields along / ; we shall call these J -fields. We define fe
0
0
/o
p
If G L (MM)-f
= f onbM}
if fcM * 0
0
LUMMY = P
L (MM)
if fcAf = 0 .
Theorem. Suppose that f : A / —» N is a harmonic map. Let ACM and suppose that either 2 £ m < p < °° and" A i i «o( q-polar (1/p + l/q = 1), or r/iat 1 = m < p < °o ami A contains at least two points (A ¥= 0 if bM # 0 ) . TTien fliere are maps f G L[{M.N) arbitrarily close to / JUCA that f is harmonic on M\A, f is not harmonic on M, and f — f on bM if bM ¥= 0. a
0
a
Remark. The case m = 1 does require special attention as shown by the following example of Lemaire: A continuous map of a circle to a flat 2-torus which is a geodesic except at one point A is a geodesic everywhere. Hence it is not sufficient for A is nonpolar. In this one case m — 1, every nonempty set is nonpolar and Lemma 5) of Section 2 is not true. However in this case harmonic maps are characterized as geodesies parameterized proportionally to arc lengths, and this fact makes possible a simple proof of the theorem in this case. The manifold M contains a circle if bM = 0 , or an interval, if bM ¥= 0 . If in the first case, the circle is parameterized by [0,1], with A D {0,a}, then/ = / ° 9 where 0
249 865
REMOVABLE SINGULARITIES
6(f) =
(1 - ta)t + et
0 £ f< a
toft + ea
a < t£ 1
{(1 -
is harmonic on M \ A for | E | < 1, but not on M if e # 0. In the second case if the interval is parameterized by [0,1] and if A D {a}, 0 < a < 1, the same alteration of/o works. In both cases the perturbed m a p / i s a Lipschitz map; i . e . / E L"(M,N). Proof. The proof for m = 1 is part of the preceding remark so we will assume m > 2. If we define the distribution pairing on M compatible with the usual Impairing (9) then Range f = { / G Z,£,(M,V):(/,d>) = 0 for all
fa
h
0
/n
w
p
/o
a
P
P
=
a
P
Say that <j> G Z,f(M,V) is tangent (respectively, normal) along f rja^/V (respectively, <J>(*) 1 T N) for all f £ M ; equivalently, iff
0
if
Ml)
respectively,
mm =
LV(/ )
These equations permit us to extend our definitions to distributions. Letting, for example, L ? , ( A f , V ) and L ,(M,V) denote the spaces of tangents and normals, we denote by T
IT - n
±
P
; LttM.V)-*
L
P
L
L .,(M,V)
the orthogonal projection
II is self-adjoint because r is an isometry. We want a slight generalization: Let u G T ; then T~'u G Lf(M,Uf. so Dr(T~'u) is a well-defined continuous linear operator on L (M,V). Since p > m and M is compact, Dr(T~ u) acts similarly on L\_ (M,V); and hence by duality, on Lt,(M,V). Define the projection P
l
a
and notice that n
0
= II.
250 866
J. EELLS & J. C. POLKING
As a result of (8), the space Ker J is invariant under Dr(f ), and consequently under the projection I I . It follows that we have the orthogonal direct sum h
Ker J
0
= Ker j £ © Ker J
fa
T fo
where for example Ker jj = Ker 3 n Li](M,V) . Let {(j>!,...,
h
r
fa
fe
T
h
5
G Then define F: L> (M,V) t
=
U
X("3 )«P eKer^ . J
/
0
1
n V -* L J / M . V )
© Ker 7 b y / o
F(«) = anu«).*(X~ (iO) + Gu). ,
F is a smooth map and its differential at 0 is 1
DF(0) = (Il.ir o (J + iff + G ) . We will show that Z>F (0): U,(M,V) - » £* (*f V)r © Ker % i s surjective. Suppose u G Z,£,(M,V) and f G i . f ( M , V ) satisfies 7 / + -nf = u. Then if * 6 Ker J , fQ
t
l
J
0
/ o
fa
(•n(J
f -rrj-'w,^) - ( I T / , * ) = (u,ty).
!a
1
Hence if (g.uY) G Co(M . V ) © Ker J we have all u G Lt,(,M,V)
A
is perpendicular to the range of
DF(0),
0 = (w,g) + (U,
(4i,4>j)8y = 0. Since g is normal, and the 6's are tan-
gential, we conclude that J 1
G
T
+ UJ = o, i|. + 2 (
Since the span of the 6's contains no J fields we see that il» = 0, and = 0 1 < / £ a. This implies that if/ = 0, and then that g = 0. Hence £>F(0) has dense range. Since II is just an algebraic projection the range is also closed. We can now apply the implicit function theorem to conclude that there is a neighborhood I f C Y of 0 in H&M ,V) such that °W n F ( 0 ) is a closed smooth submanifold whose tangent space at 0 is fa
_ 1
t
{ « G L ? , ( M , V ) : H 1 K e r / J U M ; ) =0,1
as j £
T
s).
This space contains nv whenever v G C " ( M , V ) and T ] £ L ? I ( M , R ) with support T) C A. Since 1 < q s m, Lemma 5) of §2 implies that dim {« £ ¥ fl F~'(0): support w C A} = « .
251 REMOVABLE SINGULARITIES
867
Thus we can find O ^ w G T f fl F ~ ' (0) arbitrarily close to 0 with supportu C A. For any such u l e t / = T~\u). Then f r ( / ) = 0 and T ( / ) - u. In particular, / G L (,M,U)° is harmonic on M \A, but not on A. Finally, we show that / ( M ) C A/: Because n„ is an orthogonal projection. P
n n„ = n„ + (n - n„> • n„ = [/ + cn - nj] • IL.. Now n = I l and u -* Xl is continuous, so we see that for ||n - I I J < 1 the projection II is one-to-one on range n„. Since F(«) = 0, we have n(Il„H) = 0, so for u sufficiently small, l\ u — 0. That is, using (6) 0
u
u
u = Drif)u = Dr(f) = T ( r ° / ) By (2), i r ( r ° / ) = ^ e x p ^ (r=/)] = MDr(/o)exp: '(/)]. Since t r ( / ) = Tf[exp '(/)] = 0 and Ker J is invariant under Drf , it follows that Tr(r°/) = 0. But then T(f) = T ( / ) = u = r ( r ° / ) = F ( r ° / ) , and since T is one-to-one, / = r ° / . Hence / ( M ) C N. o
/o
h
0
Corollary. Suppose p > m ^ 2. A closed subset A C M is q-polar if and only if any weakly harmonic map f:M\A—* N in L (M.N) is weakly harmonic on M. P
Proof. The necessity has been established in the theorem in §3. For the sufficiency, we assume that A is not a-polar. Taking a constant map/ in the theorem above, we can find a nearly constant map / w h i c h is harmonic on M \A and not harmonic on M. It cannot be weakly harmonic on M either, for weakly harmonic continuous maps are harmonic. • 0
Theorem. Suppose that / : M —* N is a harmonic map. and 0 < a < 1. Let ACM be a closed set with 0 < A _ , ( A ) . Then there are maps f G C (M,N) arbitrarily close tof which are harmonic on M\A but not on M; and f=/o on bM. 0
m
+Q
la
g
The proof is similar to that of the theorem above; we add some comments: The space C ° = A(l + a,°°,°°) in the notation of [T], the scale of spaces A(o:,°°,co) being defined for all a G R. Consequently we may consider the harmonic map operator l-
T! A(a +
A(a - 1 «>,«>>( M,V).
It is a consequence of Theorems II.1 and VII.2 in (C] that dim{w G A(a - 1 ™™)(M,V):
supp u C A} = oo,
5. A reflection principle. Schwarz's reflection principle for harmonic maps has been established by J. C . Wood in his thesis [W] (see also [ E L I , § 3 ] . We now adapt the methods of [HP1] to obtain a generalization of Wood's result, under rather general hypotheses. Let M, N be Riemannian manifolds with isometric symmetries a. s across hypersurfaces I C M, S C N. Then X, S are totally geodesic submanifolds. We shall
252 868
J. EELLS & J. C. POLKING
assume that S , S disconnect M, N into two components, denoted by M~, N*. Following [S, Ch. VI], for sufficiently small e > 0 any f G L](M*,N*) can be restricted to 2
= {x G M
e
2
to produce a map f G L (X,N)\ (with values in L (1,N). e
+
:dist(jc,S) = e}
furthermore, this restriction is continuous in e
U1
r• 2
/ 3
I/7
+
Theorem. Let f G L](M ,N*) n C\M+ U 2,/V) fee a harmonic map carrying 2 irtfo 5 (as above). Assume that as e—»0 i/ie normal derivative df^/dv has tangential component converging to 0 weakly in the distributional sense. Then the map f(x) (11)
F(x) =
ifxEW
.af(sx)
if xE M
is harmonic on M. 1
Proof. We shall work in a o-stable chart V of M with coordinates x — (x'j" ) G R™ x R = R , such that cr(x) = (x' -x ) and in an s-stable chart W of /V with coordinates y = y',y") G R"" x R = R", such that s(y) = ( y ' , - y " ) . We will assume that / ( 0 ) = 0, and that fix) = (f'(x),...,f(x)) in these coordinates. Let -1
m
m
1
V
s
- {x G V : ±x" > 0},
B = {* G V : J:™ = 0}.
Then (12)
/ V , 0 ) = 0,
so
in W0}\
/%*',£>-» 0
(13)
lim / ° U ' , E ) exists in 3>'(fl);
(1 < a ^ n)
(14)
/ £ ( * ' , E ) - * 0 weakly in 2)'
(1£ « < $
(15)
lim / " ( T ' , E ) exists in ^'(B);
(I ^ / < m , l < a = ? n ) .
The remaining first derivative f" is handled by the m
Lemma,
iim f" (x',z) exists in %'(B). t tit m
+
Proof. The key tool is the following [HP1, Lemma 5.3]: Take rji G C * ( V ) , v G WW). Then the following assertions are equivalent: a) ty(x',E) - » v weakly in 3)'(rf) as e - * 0+; b) tH*'.e) - * v strongly in W(B) as E - * 0 + ; c) i|rS v ® 5 in 3)'(V) as E - » 0 + . (Here S is Lebesgue measure on the hyperplane x = E ; \ ' characteristic function of the set {x £ R " : r " > E}.) Furthermore, these three conditions imply d) the net {^ip) converges in the strong topology of 3)'(V) as E —» 0 + . E
0
m
e
s t
c
n
e
253 REMOVABLE SINGULARITIES
869
To prove our lemma we write the harmonic map equation in the form
(16)
a,(s77 V i i i = b%ftf,
+
™v
( 1 ^ 7 ^ «)•
From %SwrVr
VdeTi) = VdeTi r
8 / ; + xAWf? £
VdeTi)
we then obtain m-1
m
(17) 8,/: VdeTi * - = Bfy^f" VdeTi) - g 5,/, VdeTi g'
- xM/tB
Using the key tool, it suffices to verify that the right member converges in 9)'(V) as E —> 0 + . Firstly, since / £ L \ , d^x^ff Vdet g) converges in 9>'(V), because
X.gV: Vdetl -* 0f
VdeTi
t
in L \ V ) .
Secondly, for I £ i £ m - 1, 8 / - has a limit in 2>'(V) by the key tool and (15). F i n a l l y , / £ Z.J insures that tffcfffj £ L ' ( V ) C L ' ( V ) , so that the third limit exists. • E
+
We are now in position to complete the proof of the theorem: It is clear that F is harmonic on V \B, and continuous on V. It remains to show that F is weakly harmonic on V: Note that a
lim F (x',z) E-»0+
a
= lim F (x',z),
1£ a £ n
E-»02
+
both limits being in L (B,R"). Furthermore, F belongs to both Z-,(V ,R") and /.f(V",R"), s o F £ L (V,R ). Using the harmonicity of F on V \B, for all d> G Co(V) and E > 0, we have as in (3) of §3 I/2
2
0=
= \
n
l-dj^FJ
VdeTi) +
(F?dv Vdeti
g» +
b%F<-F*]<\,dx
bUF7Ffy)dx
|F/
\/deTi
g» + f$FrF?<{>
(I £ -y £ n);
its vanishing for all
254
870
J . E E L L S
a
t a
&
J . C .
P O L K I N G
t c ' e ) / ( x , e ) [ * C t ' , E ) - * r y , - e ) ] V d e T i oV 1
i
,
+
g™U',£)/^',E)[*U',e)
+
m
Ji -e
Using (15) and (14) respectively we see that these terms converge to 0. Case: y = n. Again using the symmetries, the boundary integrals become Z
I
S^'.8)/?(*',e)[«Mx',e) + c b U ' - e ) ] V d e T i d i '
Those terms converge to 0, using (12) and the lemma, respectively.
•
Corollary. In the theorem suppose we also require thai f G C°(M* U £ , A 0 and df/dv—* 0 in the distributional sense. Then F maps M into S. Proof.
Define f/(jt) F(x) = \ lf(ox)
if*e M \ ]fxEM~. +
Then F is harmonic on M. But F = F on ftf , so by the unique continuation theorem we have F = F on M. Consequently sF = F. • 7
Remark. We can take s - identity on A , in which case we obtain a criterion for doubling a harmonic map M —* N. That is especially interesting in case M U 2 is a bordered Riemann surface, for the conformal structure of the double is canonically determined by that of M U 2—otherwise said, no special metric restrictions need be imposed on M. +
+
+
Acknowledgment. Study, Princeton.
Part of this work was done at the Institute for Advanced
REFERENCES
[AM] D. R . ADAMS & N. G. MEYERS, Bessel potentials. Inclusion relations among classes of exceptional sets, Indiana Univ. Math. J . 22 ( 1 9 7 3 ) , 8 7 3 - 9 0 S . [AP] & J . C . P O L K I N G , The equivalence of two definitions of capacity, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
37(1973),
5 2 9 - 5 3 4 .
S3 ( 1 9 5 1 ) , 3 6 4 - 3 8 6 . L. Math. Studies No, 1 3 . Princeton, 1 9 6 7 . [DGS] E . D E & O R G I & G. STAMPACCHIA. Suite singolaritd eliminabili delle ipersuperflri minimali, Ata Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. C I . Sci. Fis. Mai. Natur. 38 ( 1 9 6 5 ) , 3 5 2 - 3 5 7 . [ E ] J . E E L L S , Minimal graphs. Manuscripta Math. 28 ( 1 9 7 9 ) , 1 0 1 - 1 0 8 . [B] L . [C]
Isolated singularities of minimal surfaces, Ann, of Math. C A R L E S O N , Selected problems on exceptional sets. Van Nostrand BERS,
255 REMOVABLE SINGULARITIES [ELI]
871
• & L . LEMAIRE, A report on harmonic maps. Bull. London Main. Soc. 10 (1978), 1-68.
[EL2] [ES]
, Deformations of metrics and associated harmonic maps, Patodi Mem. Vol. Geometry and Analysis, Tata Inst. (1980), 33-45. & J - H . SAMPSON, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds. Amer. J . Math. 86 (1964), 109-160.
fF] H. FEDERER, Geometric measure theory, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 153, Springer, Berlin, 1969. [FZ]
& W. P . ZIEMER, The Lebesgue set of a function whose distribution derivatives are p'" power summable, Indiana Univ. Math. J . 22 (1972). 139-158.
[G] M . GRUTER, Regularity of weak H-surfaces, (preprint). [H] R. S . HAMILTON, Harmonic maps of manifolds with boundary. Lecture Notes in Math. 471, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975. [ H L ] R. HARVEY & H . B. LAWSON, Extending minimal varieties. Invent. Math. 28 (1975), 209¬ 226. [HP1]
& J . C . POLKENG, Removable singularities of solutions of linear partial differential equations, Acta Math. 12S (1970), 39-56. [HP2] , A notion of capacity which characterizes removable singularities. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 169 (1972), 183-195. [HKW] S . HTLDEBRANDT , H , K A U L & K . - O . W K M A N , An existence theorem for harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, Acta Math. 138 (1977). 1-16. [LO] H . B. LAWSON & R. OSSERMAN, Non-existence, non-uniqueness, anil irregularity of solutions to the minimal surface system. Acta Math. 139 (1977), 1-17. [ L ] W. LITTMAN, Polar sets and removable singularities of partial differential equations, Ark. Mat. 7 (1967), 1-9. [Ml] M. M E I E R , Removable singularities of bounded harmonic mappings and minimal submanifolds, Bonn Preprint No. 536, 1982. [M2]
, Removable singularities for weak solutions of quasilinear elliptic systems, J . Reine Angew. Math. 344 (1983), 87-101. [M] N. G. M E Y E R S , A theory of capacities for potentials offunctions in Lebesgue classes. Math.
Scand. 26 (1970), 255-292. [R] J . G. RESETOIAK, The concept of capacity in the theory offunctions with generalized derivatives, Sibirsk Mat. Z. 10 (1969), 1109-1138. (SI] J . SERRIN, Local behavior of solutions of quasi-linear equations, Acta Math. I l l (1964), 247-302. [S2]
Removable singularities of solutions of elliptic equations, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 17 (1964), 67-78.
[SI]
L . SIMON, On a theorem of de Giorgi and Siampacchia, Math. Z. 1SS (1977), 199-204. E . STEIN, Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions, Princeton University Press, 1970.
[S]
(
[T]
M. H . TAIBLESON, On the theory of Lipschitz spaces of distributions on Euclidean n-space, I; II; 111, J . Math. Mech. 13 (1964), 407-480; 14 (1965), 821-840; IS (1966), 973-981. [W] J . C . W O O D . Harmonic mappings between surfaces, Thesis. Warwick University, 1974. The work of the first author was partially supported by National Science Foundation Grant MCS81-OB814(A01) and that of the second author by MPS-75-05270. EELLS: UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK—CONVENTRY CV4 7AL. ENGLAND POLKING: R I C E UNIVERSITY—HOUSTON, TX 77251 Received June 2. 1983
256
ON EQUIVARIANT HARMONIC MAPS
James Mathematics
Institute,
1. The of
primary purpose
reducing
periodic
certain
dynamics.
Eells U n i v e r s i t y of
Warwick
INTRODUCTION. of
this
paper
h a r m o n i c mapping The o r i g i n
of
is
to
present
problems
t h e method
to
is
a
those
that
method of
of
rial R.
1
T. Smith's
J
construction -
between E u c l i d e a n s p h e r e s .
of
certain
Using the
harmonic
concept
(due
maps to
E.
Cartan)
T2l of i s o p a r a m e t r i c f u n c t i o n , construction In
its
functions to
find
notion
-
present
i n terms
the
the
me t o though
to
of
the
the
as
the this
Smith ' s
maps. isoparametric
and o u r o b j e c t i v e
fronts.
That
first
the
properties
of
paper
the
author
Beijing.
prevented
the
Proceedings
me f r o m a t t e n d i n g
itself.
55
the
of
Hong
Special
Gu C h a o - h a o and Hu H e - s h e n g , in
is
requires
Chinese U n i v e r s i t y of
U n i v e r s i t y of
i n c l u d e my m a n u s c r i p t illness
wave
as w e l l
and t h e
Professors
generalized
optics
p r e p a r a t i o n of
hospitality
Fudan U n i v e r s i t y , due
11
J
can view
geometric
e i g e n m a p M-i-S During
are
f o r m one of
L
many new h a r m o n i c
maps w h i c h p r e s e r v e of
enjoyed
and f o u n d
P. B a i r d
who DD2,
Kong, thanks
allowed even
Conference
257 isoparametric general
functions.
concept
we d i s c u s s
of
I t seems,
i s o p a r a m e t r i c map i s
our aim h e r e
than r e s u l t s , and B a i r d .
is
because
they have
5 I have i n c l u d e d
reduction
and [ 9 ] .
pectively.
Hamiltonian
those
In particular,
with positive
definite
6 contains
like
2. He a r e i n t e r e s t e d
systems.
further details
terminology
h,
res-
included
for
and d i r e c t i o n s .
h e r e i n maps (i;M-*Sn o f a R i e m a n n i a n
the
the
and
EIGENMAPS.
4 as
use
notations
smooth.
the E u c l i d e a n n -
shall
represen-
Riemannian m e t r i c s g,
manifold M into a map i n t o
-primarily
property of
a few t e c h n i c a l f a c t s ,
r e a d e r s who m i g h t
Smith
M, N d e n o t e c o m p l e t e R i e m a n n i a n
Haps *:M-*N a r e a l w a y s
Section
However,
certain
theorem a p p l i e s
T h r o u g h o u t we s h a l l m a i n t a i n t h e
manifolds
therefore
the main a p p l i c a t i o n s of
further exceptional
certain integrable
[8]
- and
h a s many a p p l i c a t i o n s .
in Section
to which the the
(4.6)
state
Nonetheless,
cases
of
natural
l i m i t e d t o e m p h a s i z i n g methods r a t h e r
we do n o t
special
ting
t h a t t h e more
those.
The r e d u c t i o n t h e o r e m because
however,
n
sphere S .
ambient E u c l i d e a n
I f we w i s h t o
(n + 1 ) - s p a c e
IR
n + 1
view ,
we
symbol * :
M = tP—— S
L e t a d e n o t e t h e L a p l a c e - B e l t r a m i o p e r a t o r on f u n c t i o n s on v e c t o r
space
-
v a l u e d m a p s ) . The t e n s i o n
55
field
t.
of
at
258 (2.1)
a* +
We s h a l l
n
say t h a t
$:M->-S
2
| d$ |
= |d4>| :M *
we s e e that
2
| d * | 4 > = 0.
that
X is
(2.2)
S
$°,---,t'
the
is r l
is
constant.
of
many s u c h i m m e r s i o n s
$ is
h a r m o n i c and
that
constant
X
. We s h a l l
of
nl
,
immersion * : M - - S
X = m. do C a r m o - W a l l a c h [6]
of
by X say
*.
Any m i n i m a l i s o m e t r i c
eigenmap w i t h e i g e n v a l u e
into
Denoting
are eigenfunctions
eigenvalue
Example.
an eigenmap i f
n
is
an
give
R i e m a n n i a n homogeneous s p a c e s
M=G/K
n
S .
(2.3)
Example•
minimal
L e t $:M 4 S
fibres.
Then $ i s
For i n s t a n c e , manifold
of
projection
n
an eigenmap w i t h e i g e n v a l u e
we c o u l d
take M = 0
orthonormal k-frames map ^ : 0 ^ .
* S
n
^ is
m i n i m a l homogeneous f i b r e s ; Similarly
be a R i e m a n n i a n s u b m e r s i o n
for
the u n i t a r y
{2. A) P r o p o s i t i o n . minimal f i b r e s . $ = $«ir:P * S
n
of
E
. n
, the
. Then t h e
(resp.,
therefore the
X=n.
Stiefel natural
a Riemannian f i b r a t i o n
and i s
with
an
with
eigenmap.
symplectic)
k-frames
L e t it;P •+ M be a R i e m a n n i a n s u b m e r s i o n n
Then a map $:M -* S
is
an eigenmap
iff
is:
P Proof.
L e t X be t h e
Laplace-Beltrami P
-c. f
eigenvalue
operator P
= -fl (*'ir)
of
of
With A
denoting
P , we have 2
= t^T^ + Trace V * (jr , i r ) s
=
M
(-A *).n
= +A«r".
57
4
the
with
259 T h u s we s e e
t h a t t)y:P
S
n
is
a n eigenmap w i t h e i g e n v a l u e
X . And
conversely. (2.5)
Examples.
cation;
i.e.,
L e t f:
f is
If(x,y)| p
eigenmap
P
xm
q
+
n
] R be an o r t h o g o n a l
a b i l i n e a r map s u c h
=
multipli-
that
|x||y| q
for a l l xe3R ,
1R
ys!IR .
Then i t
(fiS^ ^"X
* S
T a k i n g p=q=m,
n
i s easy
to see
• with eigenvalue
that
f i n d u c e s an
X = p+q-2.
we c a n p e r f o r m t h e Hopf c o n s t r u c t i o n :
Defining
*(x,y) gives
= (|x|
a map ,
2
-
2
|y| ,
2f(x,y))
T„n+1 w h i c h e x t e n d s
_,2m
an ^*n5«<™f eigenmap »•«• 4:S
2 l T l
n
^-*S
w i t h X=2m. The most
f a m i l i a r orthogonal
w i t h p = q = n = 1, multiplications others;
for
Theorem l ]
:
H
urgently
(2.6)
4,
8,
i n the r e a l
instance,
Classification is
2,
1
0
X m
of
multiplications
corresponding to division algebras.
one g i v e n by Lam [12, 1 0
- IR
1 6
.
the orthogonal
1
n_1
, S
k
m
ra
E x 3R
[l] . * JR
lR
= $ is
For instance, (The a n a l o g o u s
Example.
m
-* B " whose components
t h e same d e g r e e
k,
are
carrying
an eigenmap w i t h
eigenvalue
m
t a k e m = n = 2 and d e f i n e
p : C * C by
power map u s i n g q u a t e r n i o n s o r C a y l e y
numbers d o e s not p r o d u c e an (2.7)
his
.
The r e s t r i c t i o n p |
= z .
Item i v of
needed.
s" " - s
P(z)
standard
T h e r e a r e many
multiplications
h a r m o n i c homogeneous p o l y n o m i a l s o f
A=k(k+m-2).
those
O t h e r s a r e t o be found i n
E x a m p l e s . C o n s i d e r maps p :
1
the
are
eigenmap.)
Take n = 1 i n t h e p r e c e d i n g e x a m p l e . And
53
260 suppose
that
p
|Vp<x) | m
on
Jfl .
: TR
2
=
m
*
|x|
T h e n Vp |
IR
2 k
satisfies
the e i c o n a l
equation
2
"
induces
an eigenmap
* : S
m
1
* S
m
1
.
S This
lovely
e x a m p l e was
first
2 3
found by R. W o o d ^ ^ ; i t
served as a key item of m o t i v a t i o n
3. We s h a l l s a y t h a t manifolds
is
(3.1)
|d$|
field
2
work.
ISOPARAMETRIC MAPS. a map i>:M * N b e t w e e n R i e m a n n i a n
isoparametric i f
and a v e c t o r
i n the p r e s e n t
has
BCC(TK)
there
is
a function
on N s u c h
= Trace
g
{VifiOv*}
= Trace
g
(v if)
Ae C ( N X E
)
that
= A-$,
and
(3.2)
T
The
equalities
first
definitions
$
of
their
two d i f f e r e n t i a l (3.3)
E.
in
-
(3.1)
left
B»
and ( 3 . 2 )
members.
operators
We p r o p o s e
i z a t i o n of
2
are simply
T h u s we r e q u i r e t h a t
be e x p r e s s i b l e
t h a t concept
i n terms of
isoparametric function
Riemannian manifold of
A s i d e from t h a t c a s e sition
3.7
functions. bundle,
below),
For instance,
then the
function
<> j .
$:M •+ I R , i n t r o d u c e d by
constant
i n case M i s
sectional
( a n d t h o s e d e r i v a b l e from i t
there
those
as a s t r a i g h t - f o r w a r d g e n e r a l -
C a r t a n ^ ' ^ ' ^ , and r e c e n t l y much s t u d i e d
complete
alternative
a r e many o t h e r k i n d s o f if W* M is f:w *
a
curvature. using
Propo-
isoparametric
a Riemannian v e c t o r
K defined
by f ( w )
= *s | w|
2
x for a l l w i n the
f i b r e over x i s
isoparametric.
59
261 As
another
morphism
example,
(i.e.,
4>:M
n
let
a nonconstant
weakly conformal),
and l e t
e
•* N
n
be a h a r m o n i c
h a r m o n i c map w h i c h i s 2
= Sg |d di | .
$
If
its
horizontally
gradient
ve^
2
is
vertical,
that
is
the
unit
sphere
case
i s o p a r a m e t r i c t 1.
e ^ M -+JR i s
then
for
the
bundle of
Isoparametric
radial
r e t r a c t i o n $:W \ o
the Riemannian vector
functions
For
also
a r i s e as
instance,
* SW ,
the
b u n d l e W. the d i s t a n c e
2
from a
18
point
manifoldt '^3.
i n a harmonic
(3.4}
Although isoparametric functions
in
reduction
the
have
some i n t e r e s t
several (3.5)
a
a vector
and
is
$ has
field
field
the
=
fibres
(x')
The
minimal
2
=
that
Proposition. fibres.
composition
ip =
too
L e t us
indicate
• N is
we c a n
lie
admits an e x t e n t i o n
a Riemannian submersion
- T T
,
i n the this
same f i b r e .
example
that T h e n if
show t h a t
not
isoparametric.)
property i s
2
extend
JR. S i m i l a r i l y ,
a r e m i n i m a l - o r more g e n e r a l l y , x'
isopara-
(3.2).
:M •* N i s
( V a r i a t i o n s of
|d*j
l
= m, w h i c h f u n c t i o n
on M i n N , and i t
w h e n e v e r x,
following
| dip |
2
embedding M
produce a f u n c t i o n A:N *
h a r m o n i c morphism i s
(3.7)
i s o p a r a m e t r i c maps
applications).
B on N s a t i s f y i n g
isoparametric.
every
|d<)>|
E x a m p l e . Suppose
that
(x)
isometric
over N to
vector
(3.6)
does appear t h a t
(and p o t e n t i a l
Example. Every
arbitrarily T:d> i s
it
types.
metric . Indeed,
to
theorem,
a r e our main c o n c e r n
T|j, =
easily
T $
• n
verified,
using
.
L e t 7r:P -> M be a R i e m a n n i a n s u b m e r s i o n
T h e n a map $
:M •* U i s
:P •* N i s :
60
isoparametric i f f
with
the
262 P
M
(3.B)
"
U
Examples.
| d
constant.
special.
For
to
A, B r e l a t e d
instance,
fundamental
eigenmap
is
t h a t if :M + N i s
T h e n <> t is
They b e l o n g
possessing
second
Suppose
isoparametric. the c l a s s of
a h a r m o n i c map w i t h ( S u c h maps a r e r a t h e r
i s o p a r a m e t r i c maps
by B = ^ A . )
every t o t a l l y
g e o d e s i c map ( i . e . ,
2
form V $ = 0)
is
one
whose
isoparametric. Every
isoparametric.
(3.9)
Example.
L e t *:M ~" B be a h a r m o n i c map s u c h
(3.10)
v"*(if*h) = div(
where h d e n o t e s
the
that
= 0,
R i e m a n n i a n m e t r i c o f N. T h e n $ i s
isopara-
metric. Proof.
h
of
*
1
'
L e t S ^ = !sld
J
.
Now ( 3 . 1 0 )
Then * harmonic i m p l i e s shows
that
Example.
satisfies 0
is
the
dldfl
the c l a s s
the r e l a t i v e l y a f f i n e
*
stress-energy
tensor FT
Note t h a t
(3.11)
* h denote the
tl
of
maps
2
= 0,
that
V
so t h a t
= d i v R» = 0
ld*F
maps w i t h d i v ( $ h) (defined
is
an i s o p a r a m e t r i c map.
the
by V(4> h) = 0)
of *
r e d u c t i o n theorem
(This
follows
.
= 0 includes
o
of
1
constant.
I f M and N a r e s p a c e f o r m s and
hypotheses
l
[ll]. * •* N
(4.6) ,
by b r i n g i n g
the
together
f 1 2
t h e two p r o o f s
given 4.
(4.1) and
by B a i r d
L
J
) .
B A I R D ' S REDUCTION
L e t f : M •* IR be a n o n c o n s t a n t
I t h e open i n t e r v a l o f
THEOREM. isoparametric
IR o v e r w h i c h f
61
is
function,
defined
and
263 regular
(i.e.,
I = { c £ IR;H
f o r a l l x e M J ) . L e t M* = f "
1
c
unit
normal
to
the
constant
metrize
M \,
and d f ( x )
V 0
( I ) . F o r e a c h x e M* we h a v e
the
= V f ( x ) / I V f (x)|
df(x)-Ux)
which i s
(c)
vector
5 (x)
orthogonal
1
= f
c
fj *
h y p e r s u r f a c e M_ . . We n o t e tlx/ -
|vf(x)|
to o b t a i n
M
M
along
f
that
= / A ( f (x) ) ,
( j • Baird's x
f i r s t step i s
to
a new i s o p a r a m e t r i c f u n c t i o n
repara-
p:M* •* I
w h e r e I = p (M ) and Vp =£ . (4.2}
Take another
define N
isoparametric function
and the u n i t normal
g:N *
m,
and
field
n(y) = vg(y)/|vg(y)| orthogonal
gj N *
to
to
the hypersurface
obtain
N g
iyj-
A g a i n , we r e p a r a m e t r i z e
a new i s o p a r a m e t r i c f u n c t i o n o : K
* J , with
Vo = n Consider that
is
the
that
Baird
I n the
assumes
d<J>(x)>f,(x)
u = a'op.
* N
and a f u n c t i o n
a : I •* J
such
diagram
commutative.
(6.3)
are
now a map $:M
s p i r i t of
that
there
= u(x) (
the
horizontality
is
a function
u:M
for
a l l x€M*;
it
condition -
follows
We s h a l l s a y t h a t a map $ f o r w h i c h t h e s e
satisfied
respects
the
filtrations
62
(p,g)
IR s u c h that
conditions
normally.
264 (4.3)
Next,
Baird fixes
which a s s i g n s
s € I and d e f i n e s
* each x G M the end-point
to
segment d e t e r m i n e d by £. f x ) . * map c : B
* N .
t h e map a;M
Q
, . Now f i x
(See(6.2)).
in M
of
* M
the
g
geodesic
S i m i l a r l y we d e f i n e
any s € I , t € J and form the
the
comoosi-
tion (4.4) by A
*
s
<
:• H
t
s
*
1
= c" * $ t s
s,t
a = a „ s M 1
s
C = C|„
t
>
lN
= S
t
S
. a o
s
,
: M -* M s s
where
o
: N. -+ N . t a(s )
T.Iu
o
: M
He t h e n e s t a b l i s h e s choice of s
t
that
* N
t h e map *
; and t h a t O
,
= *
s
„,_. S , O. t S
M
is
t
independent
of
the
for a l l s f I .
J
S
(4.5)
The f o l l o w i n g
property i s e s s e n t i a l :
Assume t h a t
each
* s,t
: M •* N. i s h a r m o n i c . Then t h e r e i s a smooth f u n c t i o n s 1 * * v : M - IR s u c h t h a t T^,(x) = V(x) n ( M x ) ) f o r a l l x £ M . (4.6) Reduction theorem. Let
r e s p e c t the
isoparametric f i l t r a t i o n s
any g : I -+ j we have (p:M *|
MM s
= d> , , s,als)
-+ N
defined
; then 4 r e s p e c t s
•
the
63
(p,a)
n o r m a l l y . Given
u s i n g iji^ i n filtrations
(4.4), ( p , a)
with
normally.
265 Assume a)
each 0
b)
the
is
s ,t
harmonic;
n o r m a l component
< T (4 * i' ) , 1 « $ > = " (ct, s ) 3 x t M_ (we n o t e t h a t i t d e p e n d s on t h e 1
is
independent
of
a
s
*
used
to
14.7)
define T .
T h e n on M
=
(a"(s)
+
=
(Aa ( s )
+ u (a , s ) )n» <> t
Thus under the
(Ap)a'( ) s
hypotheses
h a r m o n i c map e q u a t i o n
+
of
u
(a , s ) I n . *
the
r e d u c t i o n theorem
becomes t h e o r d i n a r y
the
differential
equation
a"(s)
Several of
the
tion
(Ap)cT I s )
conditions
sentative
to
remain before
examples,
sectional
in case
the
of
two E u c l i d e a n
in
the
form z •
OSsiw/2.
But here
s.x,
The f u n c t i o n
p:S
sin
isoparametric; in fact, tan
s.
Its
level
its
join S
p - 1
points
s . y } , with x€ S *
to
a
repreof
con-
describe
following
theorem:
(p+r=m).
m _ 1
to
' ^ provide
i s one example,
Consider the
spheres (cos
determina-
2
n o t my i n t e n t i o n
reduction
Example (Smith) .
of
application
b o t h M and N a r e m a n i f o l d s
curvature. I t is
the
development
effective
(For instance,
S m i t h ' s and B a i r d ' s T h e s e s
here.
(p-1)
0.
i n s u r e t h a t $ a d m i t s an e x t e n s i o n
those a p p l i c a t i o n s
s is
-
r e d u c t i o n t h e o r e m c a n be made.
map $:M •* N . )
(4.8)
+ uj(a,s)
technical obstacles
of
stant
+
IB g i v e n
|dp|
s
1;
hypersurfaces M
64
by
*S
r _ : L
- 1
c a n be p a r a m e t r i z e d p
y GS
(cos
s.x,
Ap= ( r - 1 ) = cos
= S™
s.S
cot p
n
^,
sin s.y) s
Vsin
+
s.S
r
^
266 <
(0 s
< | ,
/ 2 ) . The j o i n of
U : SP'
v : is
h
4> = u . v o
S*" ,
-
S "
1
=
o
0:S
filtrations
a
o
S
1
n
l
u •*
L
-* S
(cos
now t h a t
function
1
-
: s" "
* (z) Suppose
1
"
S
1
two maps
s.
= s
_
1
,
where
u(x),
s i n s.
v (y) ) .
v a r e e i g e n r i a p s . Then w i t h an
;
K a n a l o g o u s to
normally,
(s)
n
with a
for
Q
r> we see
defined
that
<J
isoparametric respects
by
(0<s<-n/2) .
Here
IJ* = S
n
_
1
Now a change $:M* •* N* by $(z)= respects
the
-(S^"
of
1
S
parameter a : I * J produces
(cos
a(s)u(x),
filtrations
T, = a"(s) $
1
X 0)U(0XS " )
(p,o)
+ (Ap)a'(s)
sin ct(s)v(y)),
n o r m a l l y . We have + k(s)sin
where Ms)
i^ i2 = 1*4cos s
1^12 ^ sin s . 2
65
2a(s),
a new map which
also
the
267 We n o t e e s p e c i a l l y And
that $
is
s, t
can
ci"(s)
d i n g map (lis Writing
1
* S
(4.9)
fia ( s )
we n o t e t h e
(Ap)ce*{s) + k ( s )
f o r a. w i t h a ( 0 ) = 0 ,
111
u,
is
n
1
is
v are.
analogy
sin
to
s i n 2a ( s )
(4.10) (4.6)
is
of
2a ( s )
the
[24]
4(8,
(4.9)
0
t o 4>
i n the case
form -
the
o
(cos
(5.2)
a" ( t )
of
1
another
s o r t of
of
obtains
application
h a r m o n i c maps $!M * S
of
1
, p a r a m e t r i z e d by
2 2 . C o n s i d e r maps d>:T * S o f 9 sin a ( t ) ,
a: [0,
sin 9 sin a ( t ) ,
t_]
* IR . Then
for harmonicity reduces -
n
c a n be
re-
form.
T a k e M=S X S
the
(6,
t)
with
special
form
cos a ( t ) )
for
2
[d*| =a"(t)
a
2 +sin
aft),
to
^ssin 2 a ( t ) ,
w i t h a ( 0 ) = 0 and c t ' ( 0 ) motion
of
INTEGRABLE HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS.
function
equation
t h a t one
and t h e r e b y
2 suitable
.
o
= 0,
in simplified
Example.
t)
correspon-
Sine-Gordon equation.
for
A very s p e c i a l c l a s s
0
conditions
[25].
5.
(5.1)
.
S i n h - Gordon e q u a t i o n .
We r e f e r t o
duced to
g
form
a h y p e r b o l i c space
the
- or of
x e M
= 0
a (TT/2) = n / 2 ; t h e n t h e
B a i r d makes s i m i l a r c o n s t r u c t i o n s
an a n a l o g u e
of
Smith gave
h a r m o n i c and h o m o t o p i c
i n the
+ k(s)
the manifolds
independent
equation
+
be s o l v e d
s i n 2a ( s )
harmonic because
under which the
(4.9)
that k(s)
a simple
chosen
so t h a t a ( i r / 2 ) = w / 2 .
pendulum.
66
That i s
the
so
268 Tig] T h o s e h a r m o n i c maps were f i r s t s t u d i e d by S m i t h analytic of
the
a r e the
context.
i n t e r p r e t a t i o n as G a u s s maps
s u r f a c e s o f D e l a u n a y was made by E . C a l a b i . complete s u r f a c e s of
curvature full
T h e i r geometric
i.e.,
the
i n an
revolution
in R
3
(These
surfaces
w i t h c o n s t a n t mean
s u r f a c e s of g a s d y n a m i c s . )
See
[7]
for
details. A g e n e r a l i z a t i o n o f t h i s c o n s t r u c t i o n and i n t e r p r e t a t i o n
h a s been g i v e n r e c e n t l y by H s i a n g - Y u ^ G a u s s map o f . „n sphere S . (5.3)
S
n
t o me ( c a . 1 9 7 3 )
o f h a r m o n i c maps $ : S
a-(t) = rizi
S
n - 1
in
t)
1
X S
n
* S
Euclidean
Smith d e s c r i b e d a c o n s t r u c t i o n
by r e d u c t i o n t o t h e
form
2a(t),
assuming t h a t $ has t h e
$(x,
, producing a harmonic
^"X S^" w i t h a wavy m e t r i c i n t o t h e
In a letter
(5.4)
*
form
= (cos a ( t ) . x , s i n
a(t)).
R e c e n t l y K . U h l e n b e c k h a s found t h a t and a g e n e r a l i z a t i o n , as follows
(see
[22]):
Given a r e p r e s e n t a t i o n
p:G -
group G , l e t G = p " ( S O ( n ) ) .
Q
X IR <* S
of
a compact L i e
C o n s i d e r maps
Q
$:G/G
S0(n+1)
n
2 of
the
form $ ( x , |d,j>{x,t)|
t)=p(g)*a(t) 2
= E. |A. (t)| a
where A j = p ( l ) e ^ and 4
map e q u a t i o n
takes
for a l l g e x .
(e..)
the
2
+ |a-(t)|
i s a base
form
67
T h e n d
,
f o r L ( G ) . Then t h e h a r m o n i c
269
2
2
2
a"(t)+EA a(t) + (E|A..a(t)| +|a-(t}| )a(t)
J. this
-
0.
M o s e r h a s o b s e r v e d t h a t t h e h a r m o n i c map e q u a t i o n
for
p r o b l e m c a n be i n t e r p r e t e d a s t h a t d e s c r i b i n g Neumann's n
on S :
A p a r t i c l e moves on S
n
under t h e
influence
of
flow
a quadratic
Q
potential
v=h < C x , x > ,
where C=(
°'-.
) with 0 < C
< - o
<
- C
.
n
n The e q u a t i o n s
\
(i.e.,
of motion
k
> - | a ' j^bjj
+ ( tm,*
a
= - C
are
k
(OSkSn)
n+1 u n c o u p l e d h a r m o n i c o s c i l l a t o r s ) .
formulation
x
I t s Hamiltonian
is
H
k =
v
k
y
'
i
H
• " x
[
0
s
k
£
n
k
>'
with 2H = < C x , x ) +
c o n s t r a i n e d to i x , y ^=0. the
lie
This
following
2
|x| |y|
2
-
on t h e s u b m a n i f o l d i n R
system i s
integrable
rational integrals
2
< x,y)
2
n
+
2
g i v e n by
2
|x| -l=0,
( a s Neumann k n e w } ; and h a s
(found by K . U h l e n b e c k k ^ )
:
x, y • - x . y, , 2 k j J
j*k Furthermore,
c
C
k" j
t h e H a m i l t o n i a n c a n be e x p r e s s e d
i n the
form
n 2H =
Z
k=0 Moser
C, F . ( y , x ) . K
K
has a l s o observed t h a t the H a m i l t o n i a n f o r m u l a t i o n
the g e o d e s i c
equation
of
270
|e *[ - 1
on the g e n e r i c
2
ellipsoid
(x:Q(x)= E
C. x. k
k=0 obtained
from t h a t o f
transformation Hamiltonian
2H =
Neumann's
( x , y) ^
(y,-x)
flow
in
JR
" -1 I C F k=0 1
topics
between t h e s e
i n a l g e b r a i c geometry,
the e x c e l l e n t
In (2.5)
accounts
required
given
t h e Hopf c o n s t r u c t i o n
provided that
geometric
it
is
flow,
a pleasure
to 3
by Mc Kean and M o s e r ^ '
1 6
ADDENDA.
d e f i n e s Riemannian f i b r a t i o n s fibres,
the
p e r i o d i c Korteweg - de V r i e s
6. (6.1)
symplectic
(-x,y).
and m e c h a n i c a l phenomena,
to
Indeed,
is
k
For the r i c h i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s
refer
.
) n
°
through the 2 n + 1
(C < * - ' < C
is
h
and s p e c i a l
= l)
k
4:S
the base S
2 n
n
w i t h p=g=n=l,
- * S
n
2,
4,
8
with minimal
i s a sphere
of
r a d i u s h-
In
2 that case (6.2)
L e t d>: M *
and l e t level
|ck$j =n,
as
r e q u i r e d by
(2.3).
IR be an i s o p a r a m e t r i c f u n c t i o n
C ={xe M:7$(x)=0) .
hypersurfaces
of
(as i n
The u n i t n o r m a l s t o t h e
* in M define
a vector
field
whose t r a j e c t o r i e s a r e g e o d e s i e s of M. W i t h s u i t a b l e zations
these nonsingular
e a c h o f w h i c h has c o n s t a n t (6.3)
Suppose
P
—Q
M
N
hypersurfaces mean
69
various on M-C parametri-
form a p a r a l l e l
curvatureE^T3.
(3.3)),
family,
^
271 is
a commutative d i a g r a m , where p . T a r e Riemannian s u b m e r s i o n s . H
Suppose
H
H
t h a t t|^(T P)<^— T Q , where T P d e n o t e s t h e
horizontal following
bundle
t a n g e n t v e c t o r s o f P . And assume t h a t one o f three
conditions
is
of the
satisfied:
H
1) J>* ( T P ) < ^ — T g ; 2)
TT h a s t o t a l l y
3)
for
geodesic
a l l xeM, p
1
(x) * ir
submersion with minimal f i b r e s . harmonic i f f that
TT«I|!
is
is
fibres; ($ ( x ) ) Then
a Riemannian
, = H * T , ,
is
IT-ill
S O
if h a r m o n i c
implies
harmonic.
Example.
principally
T
vertical. In particular,
T h a t c a n be v i e w e d a s a s o r t o f (6.4)
is
equivariance
L e t G , H be L i e g r o u p s
on m a n i f o l d s P,
map I | I : P * Q i s A - e g u i v a r i a n t
theorem.
a c t i n g i s o m e t r i c a l l y and
Q. L e t A : G * H be an e p i m o r p h i s m . A if
«J> (rw) = A ( r ) t|i (w)
for
all
spaces
r € G, w € P ;
t h u s we have an i n d u c e d map $ o f
and a commutative
the
orbit
diagram
if P
— Q
*G p/G = M — Assume a l s o
N
= Q/H
t h a t G , H a r e compact and a r e endowed w i t h
i n v a r i a n t Riemannian m e t r i c s w i t h r e s p e c t 1)
A:G * H i s
2)
for
£(r)=rw
Q
is
from o r b i t 3)
to which
a Riemannian f i b r a t i o n ;
e a c h w £ P t h e map £ : G * F (w ) = f } ( n ( w ) ) Q
Q
an i s o m e t r y to
bi-
(up t o a s c a l e
(
G
n:H - HlZg)
70
given
f a c t o r w h i c h may v a r y
orbit).
s i m i l a r l y for
Q
f o r e a c h z C 0Q
by
272 If
if :P •+ Q i s
harmonic^
1 9
horizontal,
t h e n if i s
harmonic i f f
8
' ].
REFERENCES. [l]
J . Adem, C o n s t r u c t i o n o f 20
[2]
(1975),
S o c . Mat. Mex.
59-75.
P. B a i r d , and
some normed m a p s . B o l .
Harmonic maps w i t h symmetry,
deformations
of m e t r i c s .
harmonic morphisms,
U n i v e r s i t y o f Warwick T h e s i s .
(19B1). [3]
[4]
P . B a i r d and J . E e l l s ,
law f o r h a r m o n i c maps.
Geom. Symp. U t r e c h t
(1980).
A. Besse,
a l l o f whose g e o d e s i e s a r e c l o s e d .
ger [5]
A conservation
Manifolds
S p r i n g e r Notes 894,
1-25. Sprin-
(1978) .
E . Cartan,
F a m i l i e s de s u r f a c e s
espaces a courbure constante.
isoparametriques
dans
A n n . Mat. P p u . A p p l .
17
les (1938) ,
177-191. [6]
H . P . do Carmo and N . R . W a l l a c h , M i n i m a l i m m e r s i o n s spheres
[7]
J . Eells, Proc.
On t h e
J . Eells
j . Eells N.
surfaces
(1971),
43-62.
of D e l a u n a y and t h e i r G a u s s maps. Geom. S a n t i a g o
de
Coapostely
97-116. and L . L e m a i r e , A r e p o r t on h a r m o n i c maps.
London M a t h . S o c . [9]
A n n . Math. 93
IV I n t e r . Colloq. Diff.
(1978) , [8]
into spheres.
of
10
(1978),
Bull.
1-68.
and L . L e m a i r e , S e l e c t e d
S. F . Regional Conference.
topics
i n h a r m o n i c maps.
Tulane Univ.
(1980).
To
appear. [ 1 0 ] W u - y i H s i a n g and W e n - c i Y u , A g e n e r a l i z a t i o n theorem on t h e hypersurfaces
construction of
constant
of
rotational
of
Delaunay
symmetric
mean c u r v a t u r e and h a r m o n i c maps.
71
273
[ll]
J.
Diff.
Geom.
S.
Ishihara
mappings. [12]
J . Diff.
(1967),
(1975).
affine
501-509.
nonsingular
bilinear
maps.
423-426.
H . P . McKean,
Integrable
Springer Notes. [14]
Geom. 10
K . Y . Lam, C o n s t r u c t i o n of 6
[13]
and K . Y a n o , Harmonic and r e l a t i v e l y
J . Moser,
775
s y s t e m s and a l g e b r a i c
(1979),
Three integrable
with isospectral
curves.
83-200. Hamiltonian systems
deformations.
Adv. Math. 16
connected
(1975),
197¬
220. [15]
J . Moser, V a r i o u s aspects C.
8.
B i r k h a u s e r (1980),
K . Nomizu,
(1980),
Elie
hypersurfaces• [18]
H. S.
Progress
in
and s p e c t r a l t h e o r y .
Chern
147-188.
C a r t a n ' s work on i s o p a r a m e t r i c f a m i l i e s P r o c . Symp. P u r e Math.
E d . Cremonese,
Rome
27
(1975),
of
191-200.
(1961).
R . T . S m i t h , H a r m o n i c mappings Thesis.
[20]
{1978).
systems.
R u s e , A. G . W a l k e r , and T . J . W i l l m o r e , Harmonic
spaces. [19]
Hamiltonian
233-289.
J . M o s e r , Geometry of g u a d r i c s Symp. S p r i n g e r
[17]
integrable
I . M. E . L e c t u r e s . B r e s s a n o n e J u n e
Math. [16]
of
spheres.
U n i v . of Warwick
of
spheres.
Amer. J . M a t h .
(1972) .
R . T . S m i t h , H a r m o n i c mappings (1975),
of
97
364-385. v
[21]
K. Uhlenbeck,
Minimal 2-spheres
[22]
K. Uhlenbeck,
E q u i v a r i a n t h a r m o n i c maps i n t o
Proc.
Tulane Conf.
and t o r i
on Harmonic Maps.
[23]
R . Wood, A n o t e on h a r m o n i c p o l y n o m i a l
[24]
J o h n C . Wood, N o n - e x i s t e n c e of problems
in S .
(1975).
spheres.
(1981). maps.
solutions
to c e r t a i n
f o r h a r m o n i c maps I . P r e p r i n t , U n i v . L e e d s
72
Dirichlet (1981).
274
[25] A. I . Pluznikov, Harmonic mappings of Riemann surfacea and f o l i a t e d manifolds. (Russian) Mat. Sb. (NS) 113 (155) (1980), 339-347. 352.
73
275 Chapter 5
Harmonic Maps Regularity of certain harmonic maps James Eells Mathematical Institute, University of Warwick
This lecture is given in response to requests for a report on recent partial regularity results concerning harmonic maps. I shall describe these (in less than maximum generality) and then give some first applications, with related comments. For background in regularity of elliptic systems see [11,19,21,24]; and for harmonic maps see [4,5] - as well as the references therein. t.
THE PROBLEM
(1.1) Let M and N denote compact smooth manifolds without boundary (for simplicity of exposition), with dim M = m and dim N = n. Let '^(M, N) be the space of smooth maps (1.2)
with its
topology. Its components are the smooth homotopy classes.
(1.3) Endow M and N with smooth Riemannian metrics g and h, respectively; and define the energy of 0: (1.4)
E(tp) = V2
0W\\>
2
where the norm is the function 2
|dtfx)| = T r a c e ^ ^ A X * ) and v is the volume of the Riemannian manifold (M, g). A minimal map dr. M —* N is a smooth map between [he Riemannian manifolds (M, g) and (A/, h) for which E ( 0 ) ^ £ ( 0 i ) for all 0, in the component oi'4™'(M, N) containing 0. g
Reproduced with permission from Willmore & Hitcliin: Global RieTjiannian GtortLetry published ill 1984 by Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.
276 138 (1.5)
Harmonic Maps
[Ch.
Wo shall analyse the following basic problem:
Problem When iiiti/s a given component H of C"(M, N) contain a minimal map'? A minimal map is a special kind Of harmonic map. Dial latter being a smooth extremal ( = critical point) of the energy functional The corresponding problem for hannonic maps is much richer and more varied: see the Introduction lo [4], However, we shall concentrate our attention now on minimal maps. (1.6) Our problem rarely has an affirmative solution: Mint is a revealing fact of life in elliptic variational theory, h'or instance: (a)
(b)
(c)
every minimal map tb: S'" —* N is constant for m "* 3. Any Riemannian metric can be put on S"'. Thai was first noted for N = S"' (= Euclidean unit m-sphere) in [6] (see 8 4 E therein ); and then generalized to the present nsscrlion in )5| (soc Theorem 5.11 therein). For domain the Euclidean m-sphere, the Morse index of any non-constant harmonic map tp : S'" —* N is strictly linger than the maximal rank of tp. See [33] for a proof that the Morse index (tp) > 0; and [5| (§ 5.17 therein) for the assertion as given. Similar sorts of examples can he provided, with additional restrictions, for harmonic maps tp : M —• S" with n S 3 (see |5|, 8 5). If M is a Riemann surface and N a Kahier manifold which is not too complicated, then any minimal map
(1.7) Nonetheless, there are highly interesting situations in which our problem does have an affirmative solution. We shall display some old and new examples in Section 5.
2.
D I R E C T METHOD AND R E G U L A R I T Y
We employ the time-honoured direct method in variational theory (see [24]): (2.1) We shall suppose that (N, h) is isomelrically embedded in Euclidean space V. (Again, that is done for simplicily of exposition; more elementary embeddings can be used; see [6| (8 7 therein) or Form the Hilbert spaceI£](M, V) = {
\W =
L(k*)l
2
+
|d<M*)ftv
some much 161.) \
277 5]
Direct Method and Regularity
(2.3) (2.4)
139
Let i£\{M,
N) = {
V):
2
For m > 1 maps i n ^ ( M , V) are not necessarily confinuous (more precisely, equivalence classes may not contain continuous representatives), so our requirement is that
(2.5) Remark It is natural to ask ([5J, Problem 2.9) whetherif](M, N) can be characterized as the completion of ^ " ( M , /V) ini? (/W, V); and the example in (2.10) below serves as a cautionary note. The answer has been given by Schoen and Uhlenbeck [28]: yes for m ^ 2; no for m ^ 3. 2
2
2
(2.6)
We consider the weak topology of (M, V) induced onif (M, N):
(a)
L ( M , N) has lots of weakly compact subsets; in particular, for any constant C > 0,
2
2
{dt e% (M, (b)
N) : |[$i[*j<«,
n
s= C} is weakly compact.
the functional E:^)(M, N) -* TRis weakly lower semicontinuous (since the norm on^f (M, V) has that property). 2
2
Take a component S5f c ^"(Ai, A/), and choose a sequence (foj/tssi such that (2.7)
c
M
£(0 )-»inf{E(*): 0 e^}. t
Then from (a) and (b) above we conclude that (
2
(2.8)
£(<&>) ^ lim inf £(<&).
(2.9) The limit map
3
(2.10) Example (similar to [17]) Let S , be the Euclidean 3-sphere deprived of its north and south poles. Define <j>: S\ —* S onto its equator S by projection along longitudes. Then
3
3
(2.11)
2
2
We may now state the following:
Key regularity theorem An extremal tpa £$\(M, continuous is smooth - and therefore is harmonic.
N) of E which is
This result is the final conclusion in an arduous sequence of steps - with
1
278 140
Harmonic Maps
[Ch.
fundamental contributions by Money and Ladyzhenskaya and Ural'seva; the above final form was produced by Hildebrandt (see[4], § 3.5). That regularity theorem is very special - closely tailored to fit harmonic maps: the Euler-Lagrange equations associated with the energy functional E have the form „
1
dtp" dtb * ., dx
dx
1
where - A is the Laplace-Beltrami operator of M. That is a semi-linear elliptic system in divergence form, quadratic in the first derivatives, and with diagonal principal part. Each of those properties is an essential condition for the validity of the regularity theorem. 3. (3.1)
PARTIAL REGULARITY
We open this section with the
Partial regularity theorem / / tp e%](M, N) minimizes E on every small disc D c M, then tp is smooth on M — S^, where is closed subset of Hausdorff dim < ffl — 3. If ffl = 3, then ^ is a finite set. Here (3.2)
2
S% = {a E M: Hm inf E {
> 0}.
£D
2
(3.3) The case til == I is elementary: then any iff map qy is Holder continuous, and we can conclude easily (or by (2.11)) that tp is smooth. Such a harmonic map
(3.4) The case m = 2 is due to Morrey, the conclusion being that = 0. That is a major contribution, providing an essential step in his solution to Plateau's problem for Riemannian manifolds [23]. It was also used by Lemaire [22] and Sacks and Uhlenbeck [25] in their (very different) proofs of (5.4) below. £ is a conformal invariant of the Riemannian metric g on M if m = 2, a key special feature. (3.5) The cases m 5= 3 provide fine contributions to our theory - due (in a special case) to Giaquinta and Giusti [12, 13] and (in general) to Schoen and Uhlenbeck [27]; three beautifully written papers! Actually, [27] has a substantial advantage over [12, 13] in that the variations used
279 Partial Regularity
141
in the minimization procedure in [27] are constrained to lie on N, rather than a domain of V (in the notations of (2.1)). Their proofs are necessarily different, but both make use of the following standard ingredients: Potential theoretic ideas (3.6) Scaling the map and the metric of the domain, restricted to small discs; see (3.12) below. (3.7)
Morrey's growth lemma
%MC$
m
* Cp -
2 + 2
°
Let
N) and suppose
(0 < a < 1)
for all x E Z>u2<0) <= W (0 < p < 1/4). Then
AO-
Geometric measure theoretic ideas (3.8) A density theorem for Hausdorff measure (see [9], 2.10.19 (2)). (3.9) Federer's reduction theorem [10]. Both of these results have played important roles in regularity for minimal volume theory. (3.10) Schoen and Uhlenbeck [27]) refine their argument - a sort of blowing up of singularities - and produce (as a special case of a more general result in [27]) the following: (3.11) PROPOSITION Suppose that every harmonic map B : S> -» N is constant fori m—1. If (pEZf (M, N) minimizes E on small discs of Mi then = 0; i.e.
(3.12) To obtain some indications on the method of proofs of (3.1) and (3.11) , let us consider the case m = 3. (Higher dimensional cases follow by induction, using the reduction theorem (3.9.) Let d> : M -* N be an rT-minimizing map. and take a e Sf . Consider 0
TM a
= £),(0) - 0
M —* N
280 142
Harmonic Maps
[Ch.
Given A > 0, we define the following: scaled map if\ (y) = 0 (exp Ay); scaled metric gy_(y) = g (exp Ay). a
a
We look for minimizing maps (£>,(0), g>J —* (A/, h). (3.13) L E M M A There is a sequence (A,) S* Osuch thai i^ , converges to a map e ££ (Di(0), A/), w/ii'c/i is non-constant, harmonic and radial A
2
(i.e. factors through the map p defined by p{x) - xf\x\, where x e D,(0) 0). Note that %p non-constant impies 0 e y^. The density theorem (3.8) is used in the proof of this lemma: If forO *S s < m — 2 there is a point n e ^ such that lim Jlf "Hans' (Sf n D ) v
kJ2
> 0.
then Haus*
n D) m
> 0.
Now p is a harmonic morphism, which ensures that in the diagram of (3.12) the map S -> A/ is harmonic if and only if t/i is harmonic. That produces a contradiction in the presence of the hypotheses of (3.11), whence = 0. 1
(3.14) Remark The first hypothesis in (3.11) can be weakened [27]. If p : FV — 0 —» S denotes radial projection and 6 : 3/ —* A/ is a harmonic map such that 6op minimizes energy on compact subsets offfV , then Qop is constant m—1). +l
1
7
+1
4.
ON T H E H Y P O T H E S E S O F PROPOSITION (3.11)
(4.1) In order to apply the partial regularity results of Section 3, we ask in particular: When are the hypotheses of Proposition (3.11) satisfied? First of all, we can say: Never, unless the universal cover N of N is contractible. (4.2) / / N is not contractible, then there is a non-constant harmonic map 6 : S?' —> A/ for j = 2 (and hence for / = 3) [25], (4.2) shows that the applicability of [12, 13] is substantially broader (e.g. when N is diffeomorphic to IR") than the remarks in (3.5) might first have suggested.
281 5]
On the Hypotheses of Proposition (3.11)
143
(4.3) Secondly, we can say: Always, when /V is convex supporting; i.e. every compact set in N has a neighbourhood on which there is defined a smooth strictly convex function [15] (see also [4], §4). For if 6 : S' -» N is harmonic and if is a strictly convex function defined in a neighbourhood of 6 ($) then ipo9 • S' - * R is subharmonic, so t? is constant. (More generally, it suffices that i/i have positive semi-definite Hessian, which is definite at some point of 9 (&).) There are various classes of manifolds N whose universal covers are convex supporting: (4.4) Example N has sectional curvature CI. More generally. N has no focal points (i.e. no full geodesic a of N has focal points along any perpendicular geodesic, where we regard a as a submanifold of A7). In these cases the distance function ip (y) = dist (f>, y) from a point h e N is smooth and strictly convex [3, 34]. 2
2
(4.5) Example N is a surface with no conjugate points (i.e. any two points of N can be joined by exactly one geodesic segment) [2].
S. APPLICATIONS (5.1) In order to apply Proposition (3.11) we take into account (4.2), and suppose that N is contractible. Then the components of ¥™(W, N) are in natural bijective correspondence with the conjugacy classes of homomorphisms 3t\(M) —* JT|(/V) of the fundamental groups ([30], Chap. 8. SI). In a variation of the proof of (5.4) it has been shown in [29] that those conjugacy classes can be represented by classes of$ -maps
We are now in position to provide some answers to our Problem (1.5): (5.2) For any m, n: Always, provided the hypotheses on Ngiven in {4.4} are satisfied. That gives an entirely different proof of the main existence theorem in [6] (§11 therein.) The generalization to the case where N has no focal points has been observed in [34]. For small values of m, n we have (5.3) Case m = 1: Always, as noted in (3.3). (5.4) Case m = 2 and n (N) = 0: Always; that is a theorem of Lemaire [22] and Sacks and Uhlenbeck [25], using (3.4). 2
(5.5) Case n = I: Always. That is a linear problem, and its solution is a straightforward application of Hodge's theorem.
282 144
Harmonic Maps
[Ch.
(5.6) Case n = 2 and }fy(N) = 0: In view of the partial regularity results of Sections 3 and 4 I dare to hazard the following: CONJECTURE
Always.
Topologically that is a natural guess, for in the obstruction theory to homotopy classification of maps the cohomology of M can be played off against the homotopy of A/. Differential geometrically the situation is much more subtle - and open to doubt. There are certain features which are peculiar to the case n = 2. For instance, if 9 : 5* —* A/ is a non-constant harmonic map then ft is a submersion a.e. onto its image; that is a consequence of Sampson's unique continuation theorem for harmonic maps [26], Thus a non-constant map 9 : S*' —> A/ is harmonic if and only if its stress-energy tensor field S# is conservative [1 J. And (as noted in (1.6)) in the case/5? 3 the Morse index ft 3= 3. The conjecture in (5.6) is correct in each of the following cases: 2
(a) A/ has no conjugate points, by (4.5). (b) (A/, h) is a torus of revolution in IR . (That was verified in collaboration with Lemaire, who then produced an n-dimensiona) warped product generalization.) The metric h has the form du + hfujdv , where («, v) are coordinates onlR . Write 9 (x) = (9'(x), AO ^)), so that its energy decomposes: 3
2
2
2
k
2
E{9 ) X
= £,(f?) +
2
K E {6). 2
Then dE(ft ) k
= 2E (9) * 0. 2
dX
If 8 : S* —> A/ is harmonic, we conclude that dim 9iS>) € 1, and therefore is constant [26] (c) m = 3. Indeed, by Proposition (3.11) it suffices to show that every harmonic map ft : S —> N is constant. But such a ft is weakly conformal, and therefore is ± holomorphic, so constant. 2
Remark An encouraging aspect of the above conjecture is the non-existence of symmetric solutions to Neumann's problem ft : Ef—> A/ , where 9 maps the hemisphere D> onto a spherical cap, with vanishing normal derivative on i\LV ( a l l 5 * 3) (see [32]). 2
6.
R E M A R K S ON A PRIORI
ESTIMATES
(6.1) For many purposes (e.g. application of Leray-Schauder index
283 5]
Remarks on A Priori Estimates
145
thoery) it is important to have various forms of a priori estimates for harmonic maps. Typical - very strong - examples occur in Sampson's and my proof ([6], §8) of our existence theorem (5.2), in the case where A/ has non-positive sectional curvature. For instance, concerning first-order derivative estimates, we establish the following: There is a constant C {depending only on m, n, g, h) such that for any harmonic map
(6.2) \d
(6.4) The Dirichlet problem for harmonic maps with small images now has thoroughly satisfactory (perhaps optimal) a priori estimates (interior and boundary (see [14, 18, 20, 31]).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is a pleasure to note here that my thoughts concerning this lecture have been clarified by conversations with K. Burns, F . E . Burstall, S. Hilderbrandt, J . Jost, L . Lemaire, R. Schoen, J. C . Wood and Y . - L . Xin.
REFERENCES [1] P. Baird and J . Eells, A conservation law for harmonic maps. In Geometry Symposium in Honour of Professor N. H. Kuiper. Lecture Notes in Mathematics no. 894, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1981), pp. 1-25. [2] K. Burns, Convex supporting domains on surfaces. [3] P. Eberlein, When is a geodesic flow of Anosov type? I I . / . Diff. Geom. 8 (1973), 565-577. [4] J . Eells and L . Lemaire, A report on harmonic maps. Bull. bond. Math. Soc. 10 (1978), 1-68. [5] J . Eells and L . Lemaire, Selected topics in harmonic maps. NSF Conference Board on Mathematical Science (1982).
284 146
Harmonic Maps
[Ch.
[6] J . Eells and J . H . Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds. Amer. J. Math. 86 (1964), 109-160. [7] J . Eells and J . C . Wood, Maps of minimum energy. / . Lond. Math. Soc. 2 (1981), 303-310. [8] J . Eells and J . C . Wood, Restrictions on harmonic maps of surfaces. Topology 15 (1976), 263-266. [9] H . Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1969). [10] H . Federer, The singular sets of area minimizing rectifiable currents with codimension one and of area minimizing flat chains modulo two with arbitrary codimension. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 76 (1970), 767-771. [11] M. Giaquinta, Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and non linear elliptic systems. Bonn Preprint 443 (1981). [12] M. Giaquinta and E . Guisti, On the regularity of the minima of variational integrals. Acta Math, (to appear.) [13] M. Giaquinta and E . Guisti, The singular set of the minima of certain quadratic functionals. Analysis (to appear). [14] M. Giaquinta and S. Hildebrandt, A priori estimates for harmonic mappings. J. Reine Angew. Math, (to appear.) [15] W. B. Gordon, Convex functions and harmonic maps. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 33 (1972), 433-437. [16] R. S. Hamilton, Harmonic maps of manifolds with boundary. Lecture Notes in Mathematics no. 471, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1975). [17] S. Hildebrandt, H . Kaul, and K . - O . Widman, A n existence theorem for harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds. -4c(a Math. 138 (1977), 1-16. [18] S. Hildebrandt, J . Jost, and K . - O . Widman, Harmonic mappings and minimal submanifolds. Invent. Math. 62 (1980), 269-298. [19] S. Hildebrandt, Nonlinear elliptic systems and harmonic mappings. In Proceedings of the Beijing Symposium on Differential Geometry and Differential Equations 1980 (to appear.) [20] J . Jost and H . Karcher, Geometrische Methoden zur Gewinnung von a-prion'-Schranken fur harmonische Abbildungen. [21] O. A . Ladyzenskaya and N. N. Ural'ceva, Linear and Quasilinear Elliptic Equations, Academic Press, New York (1968). [22] L . Lemaire, Applications harmoniques de surfaces riemanniennes. J. Diff. Geom. 13 (1978), 61-88. [23] C . B. Morrey, The problem of Plateau on a Riemannian manifold. Ann. Math. 49 (1948), 807-851. [24] C . B. Morrey, Multiple Integrals in the Calculus of Variations, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1966).
285 5]
References
147
[25] J . Sacks and K. Uhlenbeck, The existence of minimal immersions of two-spheres. Ann. Math. 113 (1981), 1-24. [26] J . H . Sampson, Some properties and applications of harmonic mappings. Ann. Scient. Ecol. Norm. Sup. 9 (1978), 211-228. [27] R . Schoen and K . Uhlenbeck, A regularity theory for harmonic maps. J. Diff. Geom. (to appear.) [28] R . Schoen and K. Uhlenbeck, Boundary regularity and miscellaneous results on harmonic maps. [29] R . Schoen and S-T. Y a u , Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three-dimensional manifolds with non-negative scalar curvature. Ann. Math. 110 (1979), 127-142. [30] E . H . Spanier, Algebraic Topology. McGraw-Hill, New York (1966). [31] E . Sperner, A priori gradient estimates for harmonic mappings. [32] J . C . Wood, Non-existence of solutions to certain Dirichlet problems for harmonic maps, I. [33] Y . - L . Xin, Some results on stable harmonic maps. Duke Math. J. 47 (1980), 609-613. [34] Y . - L . X i n , Non-existence and existence for harmonic maps in Riemannian manifolds.
286
Perspectives in Mathematics Anniversary of Oberwolfach 1984 © Birkhiiuser Verlag, Basel
Gauss Maps of Surfaces JAMES
EELLS
University of Warwick, Mathematical Institute, Coventry, Warwickshire C V A 7 A L ( G . B . )
1
Introduction*
In this essay we trace the recent evolution of the theory of minimal branched irnmersions—equivalently, conformal harmonic maps—of a Riemann surface M into a Riemannian manifold N. Our point of departure is a study of the Gauss map of an immersion into Euclidean space—there being two key results especially relevant to our development: Let (ft: M —* IR" be a conformal immersion and y : M—* Q _ its Gauss map into the complex quadric (§ 3). Then (3.7) tp is harmonic iff is anti-holomorphic (Theorem of Chern [13]); (3.13) tp has constant mean curvature iff is harmonic (Theorem of Ruh-Vilms [66]). We proceed by allowing increasingly general ambient manifolds N, and examining the properties of the associated Gauss maps ). Thus we consider Gauss maps of conformal immersions into space forms (§ 3); and Gauss lifts into associated Grassmann bundles ( § 4 ) . With (3.7) and (3.13) as guidelines we finally obtain in (5.3)—a result found in collaboration with S. Salamon [ 2 3 ] — a parametrization of the conformal harmonic maps of M into N in terms of (partially) holomorphic maps of M into a suitable twistor space over N. v
n
2
1
That is a theorem involving first order Gauss maps—motivated by a fundamental theorem of Calabi [9], [10] parametrizing isotropic harmonic maps into real projective spaces, and involving higher order Gauss maps. (See (5.12) and (5.11)). Twistor theory in 4 dimensional Riemannian geometry [3] has been used to parametrize self-dual connexions in terms of holomorphic vector bundles over the appropriate twistor space. In case dim A/ = 4 our twistor space has the same underlying real structure, but a different almost complex structure. It is worth noting that self-dual connexions are the instantons of gauge theory
* Lecture given at the Oberwolfach Tagung on Differentialgeometrie im Grofien in M a y 1983. ') O f course, the G a u s s map is an indispensible tool for the study of the geometry of submanifolds. It had its origins in Gauss's description of curvature of a surface M in R , relating the intrinsic geometry of M to the extrinsic geometry with respect to I R . See [20], [ 5 6 ] , [ 5 8 ] . 3
5
287 112
Eells
(4-dimensional base), whereas our conformal hannonic maps correspond to the chiral models (2-dimensional domain). We consider only 2-dimensional domains M, for they display many special features. For instance, a) the qualitative properties of Gauss maps depend only on the conformal structure of M; thus (3.7) is a result very special to 2-dimensional domains; b) our conformal immersions give rise to various holomorphic &-adic differentials on M. Such a quadratic differential was found by Hopf [43] and that led to an extensive generalization via the notion of isotropy (Calabi [9], [10]; see (6.4)). Our results are established by representation—theoretic methods (only sketched here); in particular, type decompositions of complex tensor fields over M, and of vector bundles. For instance, a) conformality of an immersion q>: M —* N is equivalent to the vanishing of the (2,0)-part ((p*h) ' of the first fundamental form cp*h, h being the Riemannian metric of N. And harmonicity of
2fi
a
1
n
2
2
Conformal hannonic maps
General background reference [21, § 10]. Let M be a Riemann surface; i.e., an oriented 2-dimensional smooth surface equipped with a conformal equivalence class of Riemannian metrics. Let N be an n-dimensional smooth Riemannian manifold with metric h, sometimes denoted by brackets <, >. Let <, > be its complex bilinear extension to the complexified tangent bundle T N= TN ® K C c
A map (p : M —» N is harmonic if
V3
z
equivalently, \ 5
Y
(2.1)
288 Gauss Maps of Surfaces . here
a
^
1 (dtp
.dtp
1 (dtp
d
113
=
in an isothermal chart of M, and V is the covariant differential of the induced bundle tp' T^N. If (fh) is the system of Christoffel symbols associated to the Levi-Civita connexion of h, then (2.1) has the explicit representation 1
(p +r^4 r lT
=0
(Uy=Sn).
(2.2)
The left member of (2.1) or (2.2) is called the tension field of tp; and is also denoted by z . a
(2.3) We shall say that a map
s:
1
( p*h) - =<(p„
=0
1
indeed :
2
2
••\--* =\(\
a <^,< r
P l
>
i i :
y
2
(2.4) If
is harmonic, then (
=
0
is a holomorphic quadratic
2 < V ^ , ^ > ^ 0
by (2.1). (2.5) A non constant conformal harmonic map tp: M—> Nisa minimal branched immersion; i.e., it is a conformal immersion except at isolated points where the differential d
^(z)=cRe(z*) + ( | | ) 0
2
k
2
t
^ ( z ) = c I m ( z ) + o(|z| ) k
for
3
Thus in treating conformal harmonic immersions tp, we shall admit a discrete set of points at which dtp = 0.
289 114
Eells
(2.6) If q> maps M into a Kahier manifold N then the complexification of its differential decomposes: d*q> = dtp + d"tp; see [21. § 9]. And (p : M —• .Y is holomorphic iff d"q> = Q; otherwise said, iff the differential dtp is C-linear. It follows easily from (2.1) that every holomorphic mop is harmonic [24]. (2.7) We note also that a holomorphic map tp: M—> N is conformal. using (2.3) and the fact that
3
Gauss maps into Grassmannians
(3.1) Let N(c) be an M-dimensional Riemannian space form: i.e.. a connected complete Riemannian manifold of constant sectional curvature c. Its universal cover is therefore the Euclidean sphere S" (of radius 1/J 0) if c>0; the Euclidean space IR" if c = 0; or the hyperbolic n-sphere (represented as the open disc of radius 1 ] — c) if c < 0 . (3.2) F o r any conformal immersion
The case A'(o) = R " 2
(3.3) Let A u\" denote the Euclidean vector space of 2-vectors of R " Denote by G (1R") the Grassmannian of unit 2-vectors; or equivalently. of oriented 2- dimensional linear subspaces of R". Each a e G - , ( R " ) detennines a complex 1-dimensional subspace of the complexification C ' = R"®|,
,
n
i:G (R")-'IS:P ~'
(3.4)
2
into the complex projective (n — l)-space; that is easily seen to be a smooth embedding, if G ( R " ) is endowed with its structure of the homogeneous space SOJS0 x S„_,. In fact, if i is represented by the exterior product r A U of orthonormal vectors, then i(a) = [ r l , the complex line determined by z = L + \' — 1 iv e
2
c
r
w> = 0.
(3.5)
denoting the complex bilinear extension of the inner product < . > of
290
Gauss Maps of Surfaces
115 1
IR". Thus the image of f is the complex quadric hypersurface Q„ _ in C P"" (a Kahier manifold), whose equation in homogeneous coordinates z , , . . ., z„ is 2
Otherwise said, we /ioi>e a canonical identification i of G (IR") with the quadric 2
Q.-2
(3.6) The Gauss map y^'- M —* Q„_ of the conformal immersion ip : M —* IR" assigns to each point x e M (where c\
X
(3.7) The map i in (3.4) identifies y with [ 5 ^ ] . A conformal immersion
n
2
(3.8) The second fundamental form f3 of a conformal immersion tp : M —> IR" can be canonically identified with the differential of the Gauss map: v
P =$! > 9
9
That property requires a detailled analysis of the geometry of the tangent bundle TQ„_
=
2
K*®K\
where K is the bundle whose fibre over L e Q„- is L itself. Thus d y : TM ->T*M ® V(R", M), where V{Wi", M) denotes the normal bundle of M in IR". 2
w
(3.9)
As a complement to (3.7) we have the following result [40]: A conformal immersion
ip
IB
(3.10) The third fundamental form of
y%k=
lt
M
—K
g
where g is a conformal metric on M and K (3.12) The mean curvature of
(3.11) M
is its Gaussian curvature. is the normal field T , , / 2 . We let
291 116
Eells
D(zJ2) denote its normal covariant differential; and say that tp has constant mean curvature if D ( T / 2 ) = 0. A n important theorem of Ruh-Vilms [66] takes the form: v
(3.13) A conformal immersion tp : M —» R " has constant mean curvature iff its Gauss map y^: M —* Q _ is harmonic. That follows easily by differentiating equation (3.8), and making use of Codazzi's equation (see (4.5) below). Those immersions with totally geodesic Gauss map (Vdy^ = 0) have been classified [12]. n
2
(3.14) The next result is due to Obata [57]: Lettp : M —> IR" be a conformal immersion. Its Gauss map y„ : M —» Q„is conformal iff tp is pseudo-umbilic; i.e., there is a smooth function I: M —» IR such that
2
=Xg.
T „ >
1
Furthermore, tp maps M harmonically into a Euclidean hypersphere S"~ of E " (with j : S"~ —* R " the inclusion map) iff
The first assertion is an immediate consequence of (3.11): (y**)
2 0
=<#°, r,>,
since a conformal metric on M has type (1,1); and that is 0 iff <0 t > has type (1,1) — and consequently is a function multiple of g. The second assertion is a direct calculation, starting from the formula Vi v
t#-W)
(T )-2V, w
1
where v is the unit field of S"" in K " . Combining various preceding results, we obtain (3.15) Let tp : M —* JR" be a conformal immersion. Then y : M —* Q„- is conformaland harmonic iff tp maps M harmonically into R " or into some hypersphere. v
2
(3.16) Example [65]. Let
292 Gauss Maps of Surfaces
117
r
The caseA (l) = 5"' (3.17) Now' let
n t 1
n + J
+
3
3
1
v
y$k=*$i*!*>
v
M
-K g
+ g.
(3.18)
Also y, = $ A T ,
(3.19)
Remark. There are analogous results for conformal immersions
4
Gauss maps into Grassmann bundles Gauss lifts
(4.1) For any oriented Riemannian n-manifold N let associated bundle whose fibre model is Q„- ; Thus
: Q(N) —* A'denote the
2
Q(N) =
SO(N)x £ S0
B 2
With any conformal immersion
M
'N
which assigns to each point x e M the oriented 2-space &
T N. vfx)
(4.2) Example. Take A/= S". Then the elements of (2(5") can be considered as orthogonal pairs (V, W) of oriented subspaces in E " dimensions 2, n — 2 resp. We have the homogeneous representations +
SO^JSO^
SO _ n
2
= Q(S")^
S" =
1
SO +JSO ; n
n
293 118
Eells
and the following diagrams of Riemannian fibrations:
a.-i
+ 1
S"
Here j r , ( K , W)=
C„_ (IR" ) 2
V,n {V,
W)=
3
jt(K, f*0 = ( K © W )
W\ and
1
Given a conformal immersion
(4.3)
4
1
1
y, = J T , o
nod> = (p=(y
A
1
@y Y:
l
3
Furthermore,
2
2
(4.4) Example. Thinking of a complex line in C as an oriented plane in IR " defines a totally geodesic embedding of €P"~ in Q - M"
2n
2
In particular, taking N = C P", we have an associated diagram as in (4.2); and Gauss maps related as in (4.3); [55], [45].
Gauss sections (4.5) Although (4.3) interrelates various Gauss maps into space forms N(c) with c # 0, the case of N(o) = JR." is exceptional in that context. (Indeed, in that case the immersion
T Q{N)
= K*(N) ®
L
K (N\
294 Gauss Maps of Surfaces
119
where K(N)
={(W,w)<=Q(N)xTN:weW}
1
K (N)={(fV,
w) e Q(N) xTN:wl
W).
With that identification, (4.6)
v
Vd
Now Codazzi's equation [49II, p. 25] for
N
Z) (Vd
<X,Z) = [R W
y
1
for ail vector fields X, Y, Z on M. A direct calculation yields the following result of C . M . W o o d [72]: Let V denote the covariant differential in the vertical bundle 7*'£ (AOTreat
1
v
y
T (
v
(4.8)
its tension field (as a section—not as a map (as in (2.1))). Say that (p is a harmonic section if -t (
V
T (
(4.9)
v
where Ric =Tmce
/? (dij), —) dtp;
v
(fi'^^m-
£ («*(d
d#0)y
dyfe),
in terms of a local orthonormal frame field e,, e . As a consequence, if N(c) is a space form, then (Ric^ d
v
y
(4.10)
Y
Again, a direct calculation yields [72] M
Ric dip = K g-
v
+
(4.11)
Remark, A formula analogous to (4.9) has been found in [47] in the context of hannonic foliations.
295 120
Eells
5
Gauss maps into twistor bundles First order constructions 7
(5.1) Let A be an oriented Riemannian /i-manifold. We define the vector bundle n c TQ(N) as follows: Each q E Q(N) represents an oriented Euclidean 2-space in T^N, and therefore a complex line L . The fibre Fl is the subspace of T Q(N) spanned by the lift of L to the horizontal subspace TfQ(N) and the vertical subspace T Q(N). These components have complex structures J" and J%, respectively. And thereby we have two complex structures / , , J defined on the bundle IT, as follows: q
q
q
q
v
q
2
_J 1
H
H
on T Q(N)^n\ v
_J J
y
J
on T Q(N)
l
H
~ - r
H
on
T Q(N)nTl\ y
on T Q(N)
('
It must be emphasized that these structures reflect very different geometric aspects of N, as the following example shows: (5.2) Example. Let dim N = 4. Then as oriented planes in T N, both q and its orthogonal complement determine complex lines, and thus a complex structure on T N. Consequently J and J are almost complex structures on the manifold Q (N). Its fibre Q =S+ x S_ ; we have corresponding bundles Q (A ) with fibres S. (Q (A ), ) is the standard twistor space of N. The structure J is integrable iff N is anti-self dual (i.e., the component W+ of the Weyl curvature fVisO);see [3], By way of contrast, the structure J is never integrable [23]. Nonetheless, the twistor space (Q+ (A ), J ) is of fundamental importance to us. For instance: Suppose that A is anti-self dual and Einstein. Then every J -holomorphic map \p:M.—* Q+ (A ) is harmonic (with respect to the natural fibred metric on Q+ (A )). Indeed, the Kahier form OJ of (Q (A ), J ) satisfies (d<w) = 0; and in the present circumstances that is just the required condition [53]. nlq)
m
1
2
7
2
±
±
7
+
l
2
7
2
7
2
7
7
7
+
1-2
2
(5.3)
The following result is due to Eells-Salamon [23]: Let to : M —» A be a conformal immersion of a Riemann surface M into an oriented Riemannian w-manifold A/; let tp : M —* Q(vS~) be its Gauss lift, as in (4.1). Holomorphicity of
2
1
l
)C
2
2
2
1
2
i
2
0
0
2 0
296 Gauss Maps of Surfaces
121
Then n = 0 iff tp is 7,-holomorphic; n = 0 iff
2
2
(5.4) Example. Take A / = K " . Then associated with a conformal immersion (p : M —* IR" we have the diagram 0(K") = IR''xe _ ^f2 -2 n
2
n
where e denotes the indicated projection. It is anti-holomorphic as a map (<3(IR"), J )—>Q ~2, so the Gauss map y„ = e ° < p is anti-holomorphic; and conversely, as we have seen in (3.7). 2
n
n
(5.5) Example. Take N = S . Then the Gauss lift
(5.6) Example. Let A/be a Kahier manifold. Then with the identification made in (4.4), Theorem (5.3) can be sharpened to a bijection between conformal harmonic maps tp : M —> N and / -holomorphic maps ip : M —*
l
2
l
(5.7) A map tp : M^-Q(N) is horizontal iff it is both f and J -holomorphic [23], In that case it is certainly conformal; as is the composition
2
Higher order constructions (5.8)
A map tp : M —+ A' is said to be f real) isotropic if C
< ^ 9 > , 5 V > = 0 for all I
From (2.3) we see that isotropic maps are conformal. A detailled study—in considerably greater generality—of isotropy via horizontally has been made by Rawnsiey [63]. 2
(5.9) Examples. Every harmonic map
N
297
122
Eells 2
harmonic map (from a torus)
+1
(G = ( G ( C r
n + l
r
)=c/
n + 1
/(7 x(7 r
s + l
;
and
n + 1
/ax^xfj, 1
the corresponding Grassmann bundle o f C / " . Thus G ( C P " ) = {(K, ( T ) : Fe
r
s
(CP"
r
S
7
where gj (V, W) = % % ( l , n(F,
W) = ( K ®
If')
7
HO = W ; and 1
n
Now it is convenient to change slightly the representation of C ( ( C P ) , replacing the pairs (V. W) by (K, A"), where V, X{=W ) are complex subspaces of dimensions r, r + 1, with I ' d Then n(V, X)= V n X. r
L
1
(5.11) I f / : AY —* C P " is a holomorphic map, which we shall also suppose is full ( i . e . , / ( M ) lies in no proper projective subspace), then its r" associated map f : M — » < G , , is defined by 1
r
r+
fr(x)
= Span {f{x),
dj(x),...,
d'J(x)};
see [73] for details. Then ty=(f - ,f )-M->
max
r
dim Span ( V > W : 1 S « !
The next result is a reformulation of the parametrization theorem of [27]: The assignment \p n ° ^ — cp is a bijection between the full holomorphic maps
horizontal harmonic
298 Gauss Maps of Surfaces
123 2r
(5.12) Now take n = 2r. Consider the subbundle j f = S 0 JU of <S} (€P ) over Jhe real projective space R ^ ' c C P ' . Thus J f , = {^r-dimensional: VI V), and the projection n: tf, - > R P is given by n(V) = (V® V) . As a corollary of (5.11)—and our chief motivation and inspiration—we recover the theorem of Calabi [ 9 ] , [10]: There is a bijection between full horizontal holomorphic maps \p : M —* 3tf and full isotropic harmonic maps tp:M—* K / . r
2 r +
r
r
2
2 r
1
r
>
(5.13) Generalizing (5.10), we write n=r+s+t flotations
n
(E (C) S
2
R
and form the Riemannian
C,(C")
Say that a map
i s
n
a n
F 5
(5.14) Remark. It is important to emphasize that the full horizontal holomorphic maps appearing in (5.11)—(5.13) are obtained explicitly from bundle constructions.
6
Problems and prospects Existence
(6.1) Problem. Let Mbea compact Riemann surface and N a complete oriented Riemannian n-manifold. When is there a nonconstant conformal harmonic map
299 124
Eells
3
By way of contrast, every compact N has an embedded closed minimal surface [61]. I f N is a 3-sphere with any Riemannian metric/;, then A/ has an embedded minimal 2-sphere [71]. I f jt (A/ ) + 0, there is an essential minimally embedded S in A/ [54]. c) If A is compact and has strictly negative sectional curvature, there are only finitely many nonconstant conformal harmonic maps M—*N [52], [1]. 3
3
3
2
1
3
7
(6.2) Problems. Lei X be a homotopy class of maps M —* N. When does it contain a conformal harmonic mapl In particular, suppose that A is a compact simply connected 4-manifold. a) Find an example of a homotopy class Jf E K (A ) not represented by a (conformal) harmonic map S —» N. It is known that there is a system of generators of n (N) which can be so represented [67]. b) Which integral homology classes of dimension 2 are represented by conformal harmonic maps of compact Riemann surfaces ? What is the minimum genus of such a representation? c) F o r any compact N, if M is a compact oriented surface of genus M ^ 1 and #C a homotopy class of maps M —> A whose elements induce an injection on the fundamental groups, then there is a conformal structure p on M and a conformal harmonic map (M, p.) —• (N, h) inducing the same action on M [ 6 9 ] , [68]). 7
7
2
2
2
7
7
d) F o r some further results in case dim A = 3, see [31], [37].
Methods (6.3) T o attack those problems there are two very different methods available, to supplement classical variational theory: a) The first uses the results of § 5 to transfer the problem to its corresponding holomorphic version. And then appeals to our extensive knowledge of holomorphic function theory of Riemann surfaces; e. g., to construct harmonic maps of prescribed degree from a torus T — • C P " [25], [27]; to construct minimal immersions of M in S and S [ 7 ] , [6]. That method requires much further development; especially, the differential systems and their integral manifolds arising in Theorem (5.3) above. I n a related context, the Teichmuller theory of M was used in [69], [68] to prove c) of (6.2). There are fragments indicating the presence of a decent moduli space for isotropic harmonic maps into Hermitian symmetric spaces A . And perhaps for the ./ -holomorphic maps M —* Q (A ) of (5.3). b) The second belongs to geometric measure theory. Striking applications have been made by Pitts [61] and F . Smith [71], producing the results mentioned in (6.1). There have been recent fundamental advances in regularity theory for energy-minimizing harmonic maps, by Giaquinta-Giusti and SchoenUhlenbeck. Many further such incursions can be expected in the near future. 2
A
6
7
7
2
300 Gauss Maps of Surfaces
125
Gauss maps (6.4) Problem. Characterize those maps y : M —» Q which are the Gauss maps of conformal immersions y : M —* K " with constant mean curvature (n ^ 4). Certainly y must be harmonic by (3.13). On the other hand, not every harmonic map y arises in this manner, even for n = 4. A substantial amount of work has been done on this problem by Hoffman-Osserman [42], [39]. For the casen = 3 see Kenmotsu [48]. n
2
(6.5) Problem. Suppose that M is compact. Characterize those homotopy classes of maps M —* Q _ which contain the Gauss map of a conformal immersion of M —* R " (or V) with constant mean curvature. Not every homotopy class contains a Gauss map in case n = 4. a
2
Isotropy (6.6) Problem. Let M be a compact Riemann surface and N an Hermitian symmetric space. Under what circumstances is a conformal harmonic map
n
2
Twistor constructions (6.7) Section 5 calls for a higher order version of Theorem (5.3), presumably involving some form of isotropy. Some first steps have already been taken by Rawnsley [64], in case N is a Kahier manifold; his twistor bundle is
t
2
301 126
Eells Variational aspects
(6.8)
Harmonic maps are the extrema of the energy functional 2
£(v) = ±J IcM . They are closely related to those of the area functional 2
A(ip) = $ \A d
M
K denoting the curvature function of M [41]. Such quantitative results are of course intimately related to integral geometry, and thus to value distribution theory; a key paper here is that of Chern-Osserman [16]. That theory needs to be extended, especially to isotropic harmonic maps of Riemann surfaces into Riemannian and Hermitian symmetric spaces.
302 Gauss Maps of Surfaces
127
References [I] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [II] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26]
T . Adachi and T . Sunada, Energy specirum of certain harmonic mappings. F . J. Almgren, Some interior regularity theoremsfor minimal surfaces and an extension of Bernstein's theorem. Ann. of Math. 84 (1966), 277—292. M. F . Atiyah,N. J. Hitchinandl. M. Singer, Self-duality in four-dimensional geometry. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A362 (1978), 425—461. P. Baird and J. Eells, A conservation law for harmonic maps. Geo. Symp. Utrecht (1980). Springer Notes 894, 1—25. W. Blaschke, Sulla geometria differenziale delle superficie S nello spazio euclideo 5 . Ann. di Mat. 28 (1949), 205—209. R. Bryant, Submanifolds and special structures on the octonians. J. Diff. Geo. 17 (1982), 185—232. R. Bryant, Conformal and minimal immersions of compact surfaces into the 4-sphere. J. Diff. Geo. 17 (1982), 455—473, D. Burns, Harmonic maps from
d
1
303 128
Eells
[27]
J. Eells and J . C . Wood, Harmonic maps from surfaces to complex projective spaces. Advances in Math. 49 (1983), 217—263. S.Erdem, Thesis Univ. Leeds (1983). S.Erdem and J. F . Glaze brook. Harmonic maps of Riemann surfaces to indefinite complex hyperbolic and projective spaces. Proc. London Math. Soc. 47(1983), 547—562. S. Erdem and J. C. Wood, On the construction of harmonic maps into a Grassmannian. J. London Math. Soc. 28 (1983), 161—174. M. Freedman, J , Hass, and P. Scott, Least area incompressible surfaces in S-manifolds. lov. Math. 71 (1983), 601—642. V.GIaser and R. Stora, Regular solutions of theCP" models andfurther generalizations. C E R N Preprint (1980). J. F . Glazebrook, Isotropic harmonic maps to Kahier manifolds, andrelated topics. Thesis. Univ. of Warwick (1983). P, Griffiths and J. Harris, Algebraic geometry and local differential geometry. Ann. E . N . S . 12 (1979), 355—432. M. Griiter, Regularity of weak H-surfaces. J . Reine Angew. Math. 329 (1981), 1—15. R. D. Gulliver, R. Osserman, and H . Royden, A theory of branched immersions of surfaces. Amer. J. Math. 95 (1973), 750—812. J . Hass, Embedded minimal surfaces in three and four dimensional manifolds. Thesis. Univ. California Berkeley (1981). N. J. Hitchin, Monopoles and geodesies. Comm. Math. Phys. 83 (1982), 579—602. D. A. Hoffman, When is a map a Gauss mapl D. A. Hoffman and R. Osserman, The geometry of the generalized Gauss map. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 236 (1980). D. A. Hoffman and R. Osserman, The area of the generalized Gaussian image and the stability of minimal surfaces in S" and in Math. Ann. 260 (1982), 437—452. D . A. Hoffman and R. Osserman, The Gauss map of surfaces in IR". H . Hopf, Uber Flachen mil einer Relation zwischen den Hauptkrummungen. Math. Nachr. 4 (1950/1), 232—249. T. Ishihara, The harmonic Gauss maps in a generalized sense. I . London Math. Soc. 26 (1982) , 104—112. T. Ishihara, The Gauss map and non-holomorphic harmonic maps. Amer. J. Math. T. Ishihara, The Gauss map of Kahier immersions into complex hyperbolic spaces. Tokushima I . Math. F . W. Kamberand P. Tondeur, Curvature properties ofharmonic foliations. III. J. Math. (1983) . K . Kenmotsu, Weierstrassformula for surfaces ojprescribedmean curvature. Math. Ann. 245 (1979), 89—99. S. Kobayashi and K . Nomizu, Foundations of differential geometry I, II. Interscience (1963, 1969). H . B. Lawson, Lectures on minimal submanifolds. IMPA (1970). Math. Lecture Series 9 (1980). Publish or Perish. H . B. Lawson, Complete minimal surfaces in S . Ann. of Math. 92 (1970), 335—374. L . Lemaire, Harmonic mappings of uniformly bounded dilatation. Topology 16 (1977), 199—201. A. Lichnerowicz, Applications harmoniques et varietes kahleriennes. Symp. Math. 1st. Naz. Alta Mat. 3 (1970), 341—402. W. H . MeeksandS. T. Yau, Topology of three-dimensional manifolds and the embedding problems in minimal surface theory. Ann. of Math. 112 (1980), 441—484, S. Nishikawa, The Gauss map of Kahier immersions. Tohoku Math. J. 27 (1975), 453— 460. J C C . Nitsche. Vorlesungen uber Minimal flachen. Grundlehren Band 199. Springer (1975).
[28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41 ] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56]
3
304
Gauss Maps of Surfaces [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69]
[70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76]
129
M. Obata, The Gauss map of immersions of Riemannian manifolds in spaces of constant curvature. J. Diff. Geo. 2 (1968), 217—223. R. Osserman, A survey of minimal surfaces. Van Nostrand Math. Studies 25 (1969). R. Osserman, Minimal surfaces. Gauss maps, total curvature, eigenvalue estimates and stability. The Chern Symp. (1979). Springer (1980), 199—227. M. Pinl. B-Kugelbilder reeller Minimaljlachen in fl„. Math. Z. 59 (1953), 290—295. J . T . Pitts, Existence and regularity of minimal surfaces on Riemannian manifolds .Princeton Notes Series 27 (1981). J. Ramanathan, Harmonic maps from S to G . J. H. Rawnsley, On the rank of horizontal maps. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 92 (1982), 485 — 488. J. H. Rawnsley, Twistor spaces and isotropic harmonic maps of Riemann surfaces. (Warwick Preprint (1983)). E . A. Ruh. Minimal immersions ofl-spheres in S*. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (1971), 219—222. E . A. Ruh and J. Vilms, The tension field ofthe Gauss map. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (1970), 569—573. J. Sacks and K. Uhlenbeck, The existence of minimal immersions of 2-sphere. Ann. of Math. 113 (1981), 1—24. J. Sacks and K.. Uhlenbeck, Minima! immersions of closed Riemann surfaces. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 271 (1982), 639—652. R. Schoen and S.T. Yau, Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three dimensional manifolds with non-negative scalar curvature. Ann. of Math. 10(1979j, 127—142. Y . L . Shen, On submanifolds in Riemannian manifolds of constant curvature. F . R. Smith, On the existence of embedded minimal 2-spheres in the 3-sphere. endowed with an arbitrary metric. Thesis. Univ. of Melbourne (1982). C. M. Wood, Some energy-relatedfunctionals and their vertical variational i/ieor v. Thesis. Univ. of Warwick (1983). H. H. Wu, The equidistribution theory of holomorphic curves. Ann. of Math. Studies 64 (1970). J. Eells and S. Salamon, Twistoria! construction of harmonic maps of surfaces into fourmanifolds. J. H. Rawnsley, f-structures, f-t^istor spaces and harmonic maps. S. Salamon, Harmonic and holomorphic maps. 2
14
Note Added in Proof
[75] [74]
Concerning (6.7). F E . Burstall and J. H. Rawnsley have established higher order (isotropy) versions of (5.3) and (5.6) for Riemannian and Kiihler manifolds —without fullness considerations. supercedes [64]. and [76] provide details of the announcement [23].
305 MINIMAL BRANCHED IMMERSIONS INTO THREE-MANIFOLDS James E e l l s U n i v e r s i t y of Warwick C o v e n t r y , England Introduction To open the F o u r t h Season of the S p e c i a l Y e a r I have s e l e c t e d
a
topic designed
to d i s p l a y t y p i c a l i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s between a n a l y s i s
and t o p o l o g y .
Indeed;
Throughout, and o r i e n t e d
M
let
be a s u r f a c e and
( f o r s i m p l i c i t y of
N
a 3-manifold,
both compact
exposition).
S e c t i o n 1 d e s c r i b e s an e x p l i c i t c l a s s i f i c a t i o n of immersions and branched immersions of
M
into
N.
S e c t i o n 2 uses v a r i a t i o n a l theory to i n t r o d u c e minimal branched immersions i n the p r e s e n c e of Riemannian m e t r i c s on
M
immersions c o i n c i d e w i t h the conformal harmonic maps
and
N.
These
$ : M •* N.
S e c t i o n 3 p r e s e n t s a t w i s t o r technique to p a r a m e t r i z e conformal harmonic maps v i a c e r t a i n holomorphic maps of m a n i f o l d over
N
(Theorem ( 3 . 9 ) ) .
M
into a
CR
twistor
The c o n s t r u c t i o n g e n e r a l i z e s
that
2
: M •+ S
of the Gauss map
of a conformal immersion if
a s w e l l a s W e i e r s t r a s s ' theorem t h a t is
$ : M * 3R , 3
i s harmonic i f and o n l y
if
antiholomorphic.
S e c t i o n 4 t r e a t s b r i e f l y some embedding problems/examples
related
t o harmonic maps. The key r e l a t i o n s h i p between S e c t i o n s 2 and 3 i s the E x i s t e n c e t h e o r y i n the c a l c u l u s of v a r i a t i o n s which a r e p r e s e n t e d
i n S e c t i o n 2)
a p p l i c a b i l i t y to global methods of s o l u t i o n s ;
following:
( c e r t a i n r e s u l t s of
i s powerful - yet l i m i t e d i n
geometric problems.
in p a r t i c u l a r ,
its
We look e l s e w h e r e
to t w i s t o r c o n s t r u c t i o n s
for (a v e r y
s p e c i a l c a s e of which i s g i v e n i n S e c t i o n 3 ) , h a v i n g t h e i r o r i g i n s work of C a l a b i
( s i m u l t a n e o u s l y w i t h the development
w i t h somewhat d i f f e r e n t
aims).
Background r e f e r e n c e s and
guidelines
1)
for 3-manifolds:
2)
f o r harmonic maps of s u r f a c e s :
[17],
[34]; 15],
[4]
T h i s paper r e p r e s e n t s j o i n t work w i t h Simon Salamon [ 6 , 7 ] . paring i t ,
in
by R. P e n r o s e ,
I have a l s o b e n e f i t e d
In pre-
by c o n v e r s a t i o n s w i t h F . B u r s t a l l ,
P. H a l l , W. Meeks, B. J . Sanderson, and P. S c o t t - and h e r e w i t h my t h a n k s .
Reprinted with permission from Lecture Notes in Malhematics, Vol. 1167, pp. 81-94 (1985). © 1 9 8 5 Springer-Verlag Berlin-Heidelberg.
express
306 82 1.
Immersions/branched immersions• We s h a l l be concerned w i t h immersions and branched immersions of
M
into
N; and e s p e c i a l l y w i t h t h e i r p a r a r n e t r i z a t i o n .
are d i f f e r e n t i a l topological:
An immersion
by r e q u i r i n g t h a t i t s d i f f e r e n t i a l ?
2
A **(.x)
$
$ : M •* N
Both concepts is characterized
have maximum rank everywhere:
t
0 f o r a l l x € M.
A branched immersion r e l a x e s t h a t c o n d i t i o n by p e r m i t t i n g a d i s c r e t e (hence f i n i t e ] c h a r t of
number of p o i n t s a t which
can be r e p r e s e n t e d by a
M i n the form
l
»
c He z
k
+ o(|z| ),
2
=
c Im z
k
+ o(|z| ),
3
=
o(|z| ).
t (jtj * (x) * (x)
k
k
k
A d e t a i l e d study of branched immersions has been made i n [ 1 3 ] . (1.2) Let
I n our c o n t e x t ,
[M,N] i.e.,
the main r e s u l t s on immersions a r e the
denote the s e t of homotopy c l a s s e s of smooth maps
the components of
H[M,NJ
following:
$ I JJ. •* Rf
cf (M, N ) .
the s e t of r e g u l a r homotopy c l a s s e s of immersions;
the homotopy c l a s s e s of immersions
$ : M * N, homotopic
i.e.,
through immer-
sions. 6RIM,N]
the s e t of homotopy c l a s s e s of branched immersions
$ : M * N, homotopic 1)
through branched immersions.
Then
The n a t u r a l maps R[M,«] i BR[M,N]
>
[M,M]
j are a l l s u r j e c t i v e . to an immersion.
I n p a r t i c u l a r , every map
$ -. M •+ N
That i s a c h i e v e d by f i r s t deforming
immersion, and t h e n removing i t s branched p o i n t s 2)
The map
k
induces a b i j e c t i o n
is^ homotopic
<J> to a branched
in pairs
128].
307 S3
1
R[M,N] •* (M,Nj * H ( M ; Z ) . 2
The
group
H^(M,-Zj)
r e c o r d s the p o s s i b l e
M, where
rnetrization
theorem o f H i r s c h - S m a l e [ 1 8 , 3 5 ] ,
An independent Hughes
p = genus
development,
M.
2 p
handles of
twists
in
N
of
the
That i s a r e f i n e m e n t o f a p a r a -
w i t h much f i n e
p r o v i d e d by S a n d e r s o n .
detail,
i s given in Hass-
[16].
3)
The map
j
ijs a b i j e c t i o n •
That f a c t was e s t a b l i s h e d (1.3)
( a t my r e q u e s t )
by P . H a l l
[14J.
The p a r a r n e t r i z a t i o n o f H i r s c h - S m a l e a s s o c i a t e s
$ :M* N
its
differential
t o an immersion
f i r s t viewed as a G - e q u i v a r i a n t bundle
map Vj(M)
^
I
>
V
2
'
( N )
I
H
N.
J
4 Here
V , +
signifies 2
G = GL (E )
.
the i n d i c a t e d bundle o f o r i e n t e d 2 - f r a m e s ,
The f i b r e
+
of
1
3
GL (B ) ,
The
V^ (N) * N 1 0 0 1 * *
0\ 0 *i
3
=
Vj(K ) ,
S t i e f e l m a n i f o l d o f o r i e n t e d 2-frames i n
show t h a t the correspondence RIM,N] *
$
3
IR .
Then H i r s c h - S m a l e
induces a b i j e c t i o n
Eq IV (M),V (N}], G
2
2
the s e t o f G-homotopy c l a s s e s of G - e q u i v a r i a n t bundle maps The
analogous
The
special 2
2
r e q u i r e s our f u l l
(1.4)
* [M,N] * I^OMfZj)
knowledge of c l o s e d o r i e n t a b l e
The G - q u o t i e n t of 2-dimensionsl
immersion
118].
identification
p a r a l l e l i z a b i l i t y of o r i e n t e d
oriented
V.,(M) •+Vj (H).
a s s e r t i o n i s v a l i d f o r m a n i f o l d s of any dimension
Eq IV (M),V (N)] G
and
i s the homogeneous space
* : M -
N
V,OS]
i s the Grassmann bundle
siihspaces of the tangent
has
its
s u r f a c e s ; and the
3-manifolds.
Caues
lift
4> : M -
G (N) 2
s p a c e s of G_ {R>
N.
defined
of A branched by
2
$>(x) = A iJ T M, t h e r e being a unique e x t e n s i o n (l
a c r o s s the branch p o i n t s
308 64
of
$,
(1.5)
If
D(*)
* : M+ N
D (40
( Z
by
G^IN) * N, and
W
V
=
<**W (T G (N),M>, 2
V
where
i s a branched immersion, d e f i n e
T Gj(N)
2
denotes the v e r t i c a l bundle of
denotes E u l e r c l a s s .
2
Then r e l a t i v e to any p a r a l l e l i z a t i o n n ; G (N) - N x S
2
2
we observe
that
V
W (T G (N)) 2
-
2
2
(q o a ) * W ( T S ) , 2
2 2 q i s the p r o j e c t i o n N « S + S . 2 2 H (S ) , so D(#) = 0 mod 2. We d e f i n e
where of
(terminology d(*0
-
For i n s t a n c e , p = genus M, d(*) 2.
=
conditioned
by
2 (TS ) =
But
2.generator
1
the
twistor
degree
of
*
[7]}
D140/2. i n the n o t a t i o n of
deg y.
=
(2.12)
below,
if
N = T
3
then w i t h
1 - p.
Minimal immersions/branched immersions.
(2.1)
Now we i n t r o d u c e Riemannian s t r u c t u r e s
N; and examine minimal immersions, The
energy
of a map
density
g
and
h
on
M and
branched or unbranched.
$.:U +'S
i s the
function
the v e r t i c a l b a r s r e f e r r i n g to the H i l b e r t - S c h m i d t norm on t h e L(T M,T , , , N ) , x ip t x J
of l i n e a r t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s The
area
density
of
4>
f o r each
space
x ( M.
is
Then a t any p o i n t we have
w i t h e q u a l i t y a t a p o i n t i f and o n l y i f
$
i s conformal t h e r e ,
i n the
309 85
sense t h a t tion
* ; M •* N
u : M •* 1
(2.2)
i s (weakly)
if
* h = ug
for some f u n c -
The a r e a and energy f u n c t i o n s -are g i v e n by V
E <
I % g' where uith
conformal
liOI.
=
*>
e. v
denotes the a r e a element of equality
if
and only
if
$
s
i
(M,g).
conformal
Then I 8 ]-
i s conformal and i s an A - minimum, then i t
any
A(4>) ;= E<4>) , Furthermore,
if
i s an E - minimum:
For
$ : M •+ N , E(*)
=
A{*)
<
A (*)
A map $ : M * tJ
(2.3) point
of
tensor
E
is
E(ji).
conformal
w i t h respect
S
f!
to all
if
and only
variations
of
if
it
g.
is
a
critical
The s t r e s s - e n e r g y
i s the E u l e r - L a g r a n g e o p e r a t o r of t h i s problem [ 2 ] :
£[Vt>!
t = 0
•
I<*'
g(tJ
t-0
de.(t) d t
i
It-0
Consequently, 2
d E
(*),
^ where
, 1
l =o
JM
t
S , • e . g - « h.
to a l l v a r i a t i o n s of
v (2.4)
,
=
**
*
Thus g
* *
i s a c r i t i c a l p o i n t of
i f and o n l y i f
= 0; i . e . ,
E
with respect
i f and o n l y i f
h -
REMARK-
A- S a n i n i
[32] has observed t h a t i f
$ :M - N
i s con-
2
/ d E (*) £ 0); f o r m a l , then i t i s E - s t a b l e =t=0 \ f o r a l l but conformal v a r i a t i o n s ; i n f a c t , d
dVttO, Vdt^
and
= 't=0
, i 1
, e
*
1 < g
>K *
" '
q
,
>
and i s s t r i c t l y
stable
t
2
^ T r a c e g'J^lv ;
the b r a c k e t £ 0.
12.5)
C o n s i d e r a conformal e q u i v a l e n c e c l a s s of Riemannian m e t r i c s on
310
86
M, s a y i n g
g ~ g
i f and only i f t h e r e i s a f u n c t i o n
y : M -> ]R
for
which g
=
e
g.
That i s e q u i v a l e n t to f i x i n g a complex s t r u c t u r e on its orientation;
indeed,
i a n t on 1-forms,
and
*2
-
if
it
f o r r e a s o n s of dimension.
conformal
e
invariant
g.
of
V
a
$ g
n
d
invar-
H
is
a
M.
That
Riemann
class.
hence the energy
ElAO
A l s o , i n terms of an i s o t h e r m a l c h a r t
of the complex s t r u c t u r e of a Riemann s u r f a c e , only
spaces of
Say t h a t
i s given such a conformal e q u i v a l e n c e
We observe t h a t the integrand a
i s a conformal
almost complex s t r u c t u r e s on the tangent
is integrable,
is
*
- I .
so d e f i n e s surface
the Hodge o p e r a t o r
M compatible with
9
is
conformal
i f
and
i f
7z n
*
(9 h ) ' ° = where extension C
T N
1 - 2^x of h =
r
<9 ,* > Z
~ to
2
a
9y'
TNS^C;
s 0, n
d
*
*
c
denotes the complex b i l i n e a r
for i n f a c t ,
so 9 i s conformal i f and only i f a t every p o i n t of 9 J* 0 we have
M a t which
t
|* l
=
x
(2.6)
A map
V— 9 = 0 z *z
\4y\
and
<* ,* > x
9 : M * N is
= 7
z
=
y
0.
harmonic
if
9-. z
Explicitly, +
*Iz
T
ls
*z
4 =
0
d
The l e f t member r e p r e s e n t s the (.2.7) point
A map of
E
s t r u c t u r e on
$:M •* H uith
respect
is
S Y S 3).
tension
harmonic to
all
i f
field
and
variations
M and f i x e d m e t r i c on
N.
of
only of
i f
it
9.
is
a
critical
w i t h f i x e d conformal
The t e n s i o n f i e l d
is
the
311 87
E u l e r - L a g r a n g e o p e r a t o r of t h i s problem:
I
t=0 (2.8) rat
$ : M -. H
I f
in
differential
is
> v
"dt
M
t=0
harmonic,
2,0
(4> h)
then
is
a
holomorphic
quad-
Ms
an
I n the p r e s e n t c o n t e x t the f o l l o w i n g v a r i a t i o n a l p r o p e r t y and characterization are c e n t r a l : I f
(2.9) of
both
conformal
a
<9,g)
is
and
arbitrary
$
harmonic
critical
point
metrics
of
(2.10)
The
(2.11) When
does
E
with
M,
then
nonconstant
conformal
l*,g)
harmonic
respect
$ :
The example i n ( 2 . 1 2 )
map.
may be no n o n t r i v i a l c r i t i c a l p o i n t
branched
of
(M,g)
*
to
variations
(N,h)
is
a
below shows t h a t t h e r e
of
E.
maps
are
just
the
minimal
immersions.
A b a s i c g e n e r a l problem i s the a
class
in
contain
IM,N]
n_(N) = 0. 2 Not a l w a y s f o r M = T and
following:
a
harmonic
map?
Always, when
1 2 * S .
N = S
We have n o t h i n g new to add now; however, we pose the PROBLEM.
Exhibit
harmonic
map.
Any s u c h
$ :S
(2.12) harmonic
(N,h) •* N
and
a
class
2
IS ,N]
in
i s a l s o c o n f o r m a l , by
We next a s k :
When
does
a
class
not
containing
a
(2.B). BE[M,N]
in
have
a
conformal
map?
Not a l w a y s , even though i t may c o n t a i n both conformal and harmonic maps which a r e nonconstant: L e t genus
M= 2
mal branched immersion (as i n ( 2 . 4 ) )
and take f o r N a f l a t t o r u s T . Then a m i n i 3 2 * . M •+ T would have a Gauss map v . -» S
*
of degree
v
- - 1 , and a n t i - h o l o m o r p h i c .
of Riemann-Roch i n s u r e s t h a t no s u c h map
v..
That example i s one of a l a r g e v a r i e t y of phenomena f o r maps (2.13)
$ : M -• T
3
exists. existence/nonexistence
which has been a n a l y z e d by Meeks [ 2 2 J .
V a r i a t i o n a l t e c h n i q u e s have boon used e f f e c t i v e l y
topological
i n f o r m a t i o n about those
curvature properties.
See
The theorem
(4.5)
N
to y i e l d much
admitting metrics with s p e c i a l
below f o r the c a s e of p o s i t i v e
Ricci
312
c u r v a t u r e ; and j38] f o r p o s i t i v e (N,h)
has p o s i t i v e
scalar curvature.
s c a l a r c u r v a t u r e , then
n^lNl
For i n s t a n c e ,
group isomorphic t o the fundamental group of a c l o s e d s u r f a c e genus 3.
M> 0
133] ,
M of
110,11].
P a r a r n e t r i z a t i o n of the minimal branched immersions.
(3.1)
n SNC TN * N
Let
be the u n i t sphere b u n d l e , w i t h i t s c a n o n i c a l
Riemannian ( f i b r e d ) m e t r i c . 5-mainfold. Take
SN
i s an o r i e n t e d Riemannian
CF-ntructure
The f i b r e through
SN as
on
s
follows:
i s an o r i e n t e d
which we view as a complex p r o j e c t i v e l i n e , V
v e r t i c a l space
T SN s
Euclidean
so t h a t
has a c a n o n i c a l complex s t r u c t u r e
J
V
s i TN y
i s an o r i e n t e d E u c l i d e a n 2 - s p a c e ,
the
.
y = 7i ( s ) , and observe t h a t the o r t h o g o n a l complement
Set line.
Then
We i n t r o d u c e our
s t SN.
2-sphere,
s
H
S
+ C
s
s
denote the d i r e c t sum decomposition determined by the h o r i z o n t a l of the o r i e n t e d r e a l l i n e spanned by
g
s .
to
and consequently a complex
Let
T SN = L
L
if
c o n t a i n s no s u b -
s
lift
and the complex l i n e of
Then we have
(3.2) Let
J
(3.3)
(3.4)
TSN H
V
=
L + (C + T S N ) .
denote the complex s t r u c t u r e on the bundle
We d e f i n e the f o l l o w i n g
REMARK.
J
on T SN>
J
on C
two C R - s t r u c t u r e s on SN; - J
)
J
=
{£ f T* N : < f , , £ > C
by the a c t i o n of
f a c t o r s through
v
H
on T SN ""\ on C
)
C . Lebrun [21) has c h a r a c t e r i z e d the J , - s t r u c t u r e v i a
the p r o j e c t i v e bundle of n u l l d i r e c t i o n s i n T Q
C.
C .
C
=
0 and
N; i . e . ,
as the q u o t i e n t of
5^0)
Indeed, the map
2
Q + S(A T*N)
g i v e n by
C to produce a diffeomorphism which i s conformal on * * Q/C -» N. Thus Q/C i s a subbundle of the p r o j e c t i v i -
the f i b e r s of *C c a t i o n I? (T N) , i n v a r i a n t under complex c o n j u g a t i o n and c o n t a i n i n g no r e a l p o i n t s . F i n a l l y , we make the c a n o n i c a l i d e n t i f i c a t i o n A T*N = TN t o o b t a i n 2
313 89
(3.5)
S N
Q/C ^
A consequence of
¬
i s t h a t the ^ - s t r u c t u r e of
(3.6) ant
REMARK.
Let
X
X(u,v) then
of
=
n
be the 1-form on
a
conformal
invariant
SN
which i s the
A = 0
if
signs.
The
V
C + T SN
is
integrable.
Lebrun has
and i t s e i g e n v a l u e s
(.£,n,J o proj,,) n
defines
have o p p o s i t e
the m e t r i c c o n t a c t
SN.
REMARK.
If
N
i s i s o m e t r i c a l l y embedded i n an o r i e n t e d
Riemannian 4 - m a n i f o l d J
L.
u, v e C™(C + T SN) .
i s nondegenerate,
Incidentally,
(3.7)
contravari-
of
V
for a l l
and o n l y i f X
s t r u c t u r e of
f,
the J ^ - s t u r c t u r e i s d e f i n e d as
dniu,Jv)
observed that
X:
: N *—j> X ,
then we c a n i n t e r p r e t our c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h the t w i s t o r space
q : S CX)| L
+ SN
N
L
H
g
c T SN g
J.
v
[7]; i . e . ,
c o r r e s p o n d i n g to the =
s;
vector T N y
s
in
T X. Y
i t s orthogonal complement i s an over
y ( N, then
s A v
restricis a
y
i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of with either
+
Z
the
1
T X.
S (X)
1 AX
J 6 S (X)
Start-
the p r o j e c t i o n
whose complex s t r u c t u r e c o i n c i d e s w i t h the
There i s a n a t u r a l n o t a t i o n of
as f o l l o w s :
i s the p o s i t i v e u n i t normal to
Conversely, given
complex l i n e i n
(.3.1 - 3.3)
p : S-^tX) * X , we define
be the span of
oriented 2-space, t i o n of
17]
by a s s i g n i n g to each
s = J v E S N, where y Let
is
r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of the p o s i t i v e u n i t v e c t o r f i e l d
Levi-form
ing
SN
(N,h).
7
SN
S X
with
or w i t h
+
S,(X)| , N
in
the
S_X:
S (X)
'-eigendecomposition
7
A^X + A_X.
In p a r t i c u l a r ,
given
(N,h)
we c a n always form the Riemannian
314 so product
X = S
1
x N,- and use
S (S
1
" N) „
+
as the t w i s t o r b u n d l e
of
N.
We w r i t e TIS and,
1
«
N)
with respect
+ TN;
1
I S
=
to any v e r t i c a l s l i c e
j : N *
x N , we have
the
identification ]
-12 1 ** A (TS + TN) - TN. +
P a s s i n g to the u n i t sphere bundles, j
-1
S„(S
1
we o b t a i n the bundle isomorphism
3* « N) * SN
N.
(3.8)
Let
9 : M* N
for which
as the p o s i t i v e the second that
$
and
totally
umbilic
= OJ and
THEOREM.
nonconstant
9 (x) 8,
of
*
C
if
9
totally
'
9(M) 0) 5
The correspondence
9 : M •* S N .
u m b i l i c i f and o n l y i f t o t a l l y geodesic
0
in
9„
x
N
is
i.e.,
|4J.
i s a b i - j e c t i o n between and n o n v e r t i c a l J ^ - h o l o -
9 : M •* N
ill
-holomorphic•
totally And
9
e,
the J . - ( r e s p . , 1
(resp.,
by e
Recall (1,0)
and suppose t h a t i t
1
2
2
think of
t h a t a map
in
$
;
i s adapted to
T S N , where
s 6 SN
£
+ ie ;
J . , = holomorphicity, C to J of T~^5N; e^ - i e
e. , e
J - - ) s t r u c t u r e i s determined on
- v e c t o r s of
2
with
H
h o r i z o n t a l l y to
+ ie
2
as
9 (M) .
(1,0)
e
Lift
i s the p o i n t T
&
SN
by
e,.
e, X
b
e
e.^, Then ie_ 2
23-=).
i s holomorphic i f and o n l y i f
M into
is
V 2' 3 p r o p o r t i o n a l to e
9*0^)1 9 . ( 3 y ) ;
Say
B. (3 ,3 ) = 6 . ( 3 ,3 ) 9 x x 9 y y
is horizontal.
an o r t h o n o r m a l o r i e n t e d frame f i e l d , e,,
that
= 0.
9 ; M -*- N
9
(1.4))
Recall also
9 : M •+ S N i s
x eM
(compare
9 (x)T M. I
A conformal map
i f and o n l y if_
defined
if
geodesic
c o n f o r m a l harmonic maps
morphic maps
Then a t any p o i n t
Z S ^ ^ N
u n i t v e c t o r orthogonal to
fundamental form
ts
6^(3^,3^,)
(3.9)
be a conformal map.
9 » ( x ) 0 0, we have
carries
- v e c t o r s of the r a n g e .
To examine
we c o n s i d e r now the (.0,1} - component w i t h r e s p e c t H t h a t i s spanned by e + ie., in T^j )SN and
V T~^SN.
1
Take C - l i n e a r e x t e n s i o n s
x
o f both members o f
315 91
6 = 9 * i and c a l c u l a t e B^fe^
- ie2,-). (9*
0
Consequently, (1.0)
vectors
follows
because
(3.10) on
such ing
ie2)
+
carries 9
(1,0)
J
i s
Theorem
interrelationships
(3.9)
Bf '
9
similarly.
related constructions
0
'
a
n
M
d
con-
And t h e t h i r d
i f i t i sboth
= 0
1
and
to
1
B! ' ' 9
-and
=0.
•
i s a d i r e c t g e n e r a l i z a t i o n o f t h e theorem
o f the
are
F o r information
2
if
- vectors of
~ homomorphic!
2
i s h o r i z o n t a l i f and only
i f and only
anti-holomorphicity
(3.11)
9,
( S N , J 2 ) , whence
9
REMARK.
the
then
homomorphism
J ^ .
The second a s s e r t i o n i s proved
- holomorphic;
t
to
iere1
= 0
of
[7).
respect
=
i f
versely
J-
1
- ie,)) '
t e i
9* ( e ^ - i e ^ J , w h i c h we v i e w a s t h e
Thus w i t h
G a u s s map ( u s e d
described
i n four
relating
i n 14],
i n (2.12).
Other
17] - e s p e c a i l l y
concern-
dimensions. c o n f o r m a l h a r m o n i c maps
$ :M * N
to
monopoles, s e e i l ] , [ 1 9 ] . 4.
Embedding
(4.1) out
When
problems/examples
does
branch
a class
That
i s c e r t a i n l y not
branched minimal On tional and
the
true
immersion
other
contain
a minimal
immersion
/with-
the
are
sufficient conditions
conclusion A 9, f
then
seems l i k e l y
i n g e n e r a l , even i f t h ec l a s s
that
contains a
(Example o f L e m a i r e ) .
hand, t h e r e
terms, with
an A-minimum,
It
8R[M,N]
in
points),
[12,27]:
0
given
I f * : M » N
i n varia-
i s
conformal
M.
on
" a n A-minimum" c a n b e r e p l a c e d
by "harmonic
2
and N
- IR
(4.2)
3
=0
positive
(semi-)definite.
The case
h a s been e s t a b l i s h e d i n 1 3 ] . Every
[29].)
mal
<3 A(.9t ) l = — dt 't-0
A-stable
(N,h)
contains
an embedded
We d o n o t know w h i c h g e n e r a a r e i s especially
interesting,
minimal
possible.
M.
surface
The case
(Pitts
genus
M
because o f uniqueness o f i t s confor-
structure.
(4.3)
(N,h)?
PROBLEM.
What
is
the
minimum
genus
of
such
an
M
in
a
given
316 92
(4.4)
EXAMPLES.
If 2
( N , h ) has s e c t i o n a l c u r v a t u r e 2 0, then every
harmonic map i)i ;S 4 ( N , h ) i s constant [ 8 ] , If P i s a c l o s e d s u r f a c e of genus P > 0 any harmonic map
$ :S
•* S
" P
w i t h any m e t r i c ,
(Riemannian product)
Lawson [20] has shown t h a t f o r every genus Riemann s u r f a c e
M and a minimal embedding of
is
then
constant.
p 5: 0
there i s a
M in
S .
3
On the
o t h e r hand, we do not have an e f f e c t i v e c r i t e r i o n to determine whether a g i v e n Riemann s u r f a c e c a n be m i n i m a l l y embedded i n
3
S ; however,
see
[39] PROBLEM (LAWSON) .
If
(JJ : T •* S
congruent to the C l i f f o r d
3
i s a m i n i m a l l y embedded t o r u s ,
is
it
torus?
For examples of minimal immersions i n t o h y p e r b o l i c m a n i f o l d s ,
see
137] . (4.5)
EXAMPLE•
Suppose t h a t
v a t u r e - so t h a t 1) S
2
I f
* (N,h):
and
F. 2)
iTjfN)
it (N) = 0,
(N,h)
has s t r i c t l y p o s i t i v e
there
then
is
an
embedded
Hamilton 115] has shown t h a t
N
minimal
¥
TI^(N)
0
cur-
then
there
is
no
sphere
3 S ;
i s d i f f e o m o r p h i c to S
Smith [36] t h a t t h e r e i s an embedded minimal I f
Ricci
= 0.
embedded
2
3
in
(S ,h).
2
minimal
S
in
embedded
minimal
(N,h)
[26]. (4.6) in
(N,h),
(4.7) [91,
EXAMPLE.
I f
rt^N)
representing
a
^ 0
then
nontrivial
there
is
homotopy
an class
F o r f u r t h e r r e s u l t s on minimal embeddings [24],
2
S
[23].
? : M •* (N,h)
see
[25].
REFERENCES [1]
M.F. Atiyah, 3-20.
[2]
P . B a i r d and J . E e l l s , Symp- U t r e c h t ( 1 9 8 0 ) .
[3]
Geometry
of
Monopole Conf. ICTP
monopoles.
A conservation
law
S p r i n g e r Notes 894
for
harmonic
(1981),
M . J . Beeson, On interior Z. 171 (1980), 133-154.
branch
]4]
J . Eells,
surfaces.
[5]
J . E e l l s and L . L e m a i r e , A report on harmonic maps. Math. Soc. 10 (1978), 1-68. J . E e l l s and S. Salamon, Constructions twistorielles tions harmoniques. C . R . Acad. P a r i s I 296 ( 1 9 8 3 ) ,
[6]
Gauss
maps
of
points
of
minimal
(1981),
maps.
Geom.
1-15. Math.
surfaces.
Oberwolfach Volume
1944-1984.
Bull. des
685-687.
London applica-
317 93
[7]
J . Eells of
[8] [9] [10]
and S. Salamon,
surfaces
Twistorial four-manifolds.
into
construction
of
J . E e l l s and J . H . Sampson, Harmonic folds. Amer. J . Math. 86 ( 1 9 6 4 ) ,
presence
of
a
Spin
Lawson,
fundamental
maps
mappings
of
Riemannian
mani-
109-160.
M. Freedman, J . H a s s , and P. S c o t t , Least area surfaces in 3-manifolds. I n v . Math. 71 (1983), M. Gromov and H . B .
harmonic
(To a p p e a r ) .
and scalar
group.
incompressible
601-642.
curvature
in
the
Ann. Math. I l l (1980),
I.
209¬
230. Ill]
The classification
M. Gromov and H . B . Lawson, manifolds
of
positive
scalar
of
simply
Ann. Math.
curvature.
connected
I l l (1980),
423-434. 112]
R.D. Gulliver, mean
[13]
Regularity
R.D. Gulliver, immersions
of
Ann. Math.
curvature.
of
P. H a l l ,
R. Hamilton, Three-manifolds J . D i f f . Geo. 17 (1982),
Regular
homotopies
[16]
J . Hass and J . Hughes,
[17]
J . Hempel, 3-manifolds.
[18]
M. H i r s c h , Immersions ( 1 9 5 9 ) , 242-276.
[19]
N . J . H i t c h i n , Monopoles ( 1 9 8 2 ) , 579-602.
[20]
H . B . Lawson, Complete ( 1 9 7 0 ) , 335-374. C.R.
Lebrun,
W.H. iodic
Meeks, minimal
[23]
[24]
the
112
(1980),
The
of
branched
uith
branched
immersions.
positive
Ricci
curvature.
255-306.
Immersions
of
of
surfaces
in
Trans.
manifolds.
and
3-manifolds.
imbedding
surfaces
Yau,
problems
Ann. Math. 92
for
twistor
CR
and
geometry
of
Thesis,
3
in
3
5 ,
in
problem structure IF .
Amer. Math. S o c . 93
Comm. Math. P h y s . 83
geodesies.
minimal
The conformal surfaces
embedding
Topology of in minimal
Berkeley
three surface
manifolds. triply
per-
(1975).
dimensional theory.
manifolds
Ann. Math.
441-484.
W. H. Meeks and S . - T . topology
prescribed
Ann. Math. S t u d i e s 86 ( 1 9 7 6 ) .
W.H. Meeks and S . - T . and
of
R. Osserman, and H . L . Royden, A theory of Amer. J . Math. 95 (1973), 750-812.
[15]
[22]
surfaces
275-305.
surface.
[14]
[21]
minimising
97 ( 1 9 7 3 ) ,
of
three
Yau,
dimensional
The
classical manifolds.
Plateau
problem
and
the
Topology 21 ( 1 9 8 2 ) ,
408-442. [25]
W.H. Meeks and S . - T . faces
and
the
problem
Yau, of
The existence uniqueness.
of
embedded
minimal
sur-
Math. 2 . 179 ( 1 9 8 2 ) , 151-
16B . [26]
W.H. Meeks, L . Simon, and S . - T . exotic
[27]
spheres,
and
manifolds
Math. 116 (J.982), 621-659. R. Osserman, A proof of the solution
to
Plateau's
problem.
Yau,
with
regularity
N . C . P a p s k y r i a k o p o u l o s , On Dehn's lemma knots. A n n . Math. 66 (J.957) , 1-26.
[29]
J . T . Pitts,
Existence manifolds.
and
regularity
minimal Ricci
and
of
surfaces,
of
minimal
classica'.
550-569.
asphericity
P i i n c e L o n Notes S e r i e s 27
Ann
the
91 ( 1 9 7 0 ) , the
.
curvature.
everywhere
Ann. Math.
[28]
Riemannian
Embedded
positive
surfaces
(1981).
of
on
318 94 [30)
J . S a c k s a n d K. U h l e n b e c k , Minimal immersions of closed surfaces. Trans. A m e r . M a t h . S o c . 271 ( 1 9 8 2 ) , 6 3 9 - 6 5 2 .
[31]
J . H . Sampson, Some properties and applioatione of pings. A n n . E c . Norm. S u p . X I ( 1 9 7 8 ) , 2 2 1 - 2 2 8 .
[32]
A. S a n i n i , Applicazioni tra varieta critica rispetto a deformazioni di S e r . V I I , 53-63.
[33]
R. S c h o e n a n d S . - T . Y a u , Existence of incompressible minimal Surfaces and the topology of three dimensional manifolds uith nonnegative scalar curvature. A n n . M a t h . 110 ( 1 9 7 9 ) , 1 2 7 - 1 4 2 .
[34]
P . S c o t t , The geometries of S o c . 15 ( 1 9 8 3 ) , 4 0 1 - 4 8 7 .
[35]
S . S m a l e , A survey of some recent developments topology. B u l l . A m e r . M a t h . S o c . 69 ( 1 9 6 3 ) ,
[36]
F . R . S m i t h , On the existence the 3-sphere, endowed with (1982).
[37]
K. U h l e n b e c k , Closed minimal surfaces in hyperbolic A n n . M a t h . S t u d i e s 1 0 3 , (.19831, 1 4 7 - 1 6 8 .
138]
S . - T . Y a u , Minimal surfaces and their geometry. E . Horwood S e r i e s ( 1 9 8 4 ) ,
[39]
H . I . C h o i a n d R. S c h o e n , The space surface into a three - dimensional curvature.
riemanniane metriche.
of embedded an arbitrary
London
in 131-145.
minimal metric.
role in 99-103.
harmonic
map-
con energia Rend-Mat. 3 (1983)
Bull-
3-manifolds.
Piemann
Math. differential
S-spheres Thesis,
in Melbourne
3-manifolds. differential
of minimal embeddings manifold of positive
of a Ricci
319 Annati Scaola Normals Snperiore - Pisa Classe di Seienze Serie I V Vol. I l l , a. 4 (1985)
Twistorial Construction of Harmonic Maps of Surfaces into Four-Manifolds. J. EELLS
S. SALAMON
Dedicated to Professor Hicolaas H.
Kitiper
0. - Introduction. Twistorial constructions of harmonic maps were first made by Calabi [CJ who gave an effective pararnetrization of isotropic harmonic maps of Biemann surfaces into a real projective space. More than a decade later, analogous constructions were produced for maps into a complex projective space [ E W , ] . Harmonic maps are the solutions of the Euler-Lagrange equation of the energy functional
(see [ E L ] ) . Local minima of B may not exist; indeed, there is only a fragmentary existence theory for harmonic maps of surfaces. I t is quite significant therefore to discover that harmonic maps can sometimes be constructed explicitly via their twistor transforms. The study of maps into a 4-dimensional manifold received a large impetus from the work of Bryant [Br], who proved that any compact Biemann surface can be conformally and harmonically immersed in the 4-sphere 8*. This was achieved by applying Calabi's techniques to the Penrose fibration C P - * 8*. I n the present work we examine the 4-dimensional case in a more general context by considering conformal harmonic 3
Pervcnuto alia Rodazione il 26 Ottobrc 1984 ed in versions definitive il 2 Scttembre 1985.
320 J. EELLS
590
8.
SALAMON
maps from a Riemann surface M into an arbitrary oriented Riemannian 4-manifoid N. Although, conformal harmonic maps Jf-*J(? are the same as minimal branched immersions, we study the consequences of the conformal and harmonic properties separately. Our approach is then based upon a pararnetrization of such maps announced in [ES]. I n the early sections, we consider in detail the fibre bundles S over 7JT consisting of unit eigenvectors of the Hodge * operator acting on A'TJf. These total spaces admit a natural almost complex structure which was shown by Atiyah, Hitchin and Singer [AHS] to be integrable if N is =F selfdual. Our pararnetrization involves a different almost complex structure „ obtained from J , by reversing orientation along the fibres: ±
COROLLARY 5.4. There is a bijective correspondence between nonconstant conformal harmonic maps a; M-*N and nonvertical J holomorphic curves f. S . z
±
This correspondence is achieved by taking y to be the natural «Gauss lift» of
2
s
L
B
2
1
3
3
l
321 TWISTORIAL CONSTRUCTION OP HARMONIC MAPS E T C .
591
Calculation of twistor degrees allows us to extend the validity of a formula of Eschenburg, Trihuzy and Guadalupe [ E T G ] . Conformal harmonic maps M -> C P are interpreted in terms of J holomorphic curves in a flag manifold. This implies that such maps into C P really come in triples, and explains the existence of associated harmonic maps. 2
2
3
Applications of our techniques to 3-dimensional domains appear in [ E J , and to higher dimensional domains in [S ]. There will also be analogous results for maps of surfaces into pseudoRiemannian manifolds. For background information concerning harmonic maps we recommend [ E L ] , and for 4-dimensional Riemannian geometry [ S J . Starting with the construction in [Br], Friedrich [E] studied J holomorphicity of Gauss lifts into the twistor space of a 4-manifold, with examples. During the preparation of this manuscript, tbe authors enjoyed the hospitality of the Scuola Normale Superiore, the Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientiflques, and the Universite Libre de Bruxelles. They arc much indebted to F . E . Burstall, A. Gray, and J . H . Rawnsley for their comments on earlier versions—and especially to latter for assistance with some of the proofs. a
l
1. - Harmonic maps. Throughout M denotes a Biemann surface, i.e. a connected complex 1-dimensional manifold. If z = x -j- iy is a local complex coordinate on M, then djds = J [dfix — i djdy) djdz = Kdjdx
+
ididy)
span respectively the space T'-°M of complexified tangent vectors of type (1, 0), and the conjugate space T"''M of (0,1) vectors. The complex structure of M is equally well denned by a conformal class of Riemannian metrics together with an orientation, in accordance with tbe isomorphism GL(1, C) ^ K xSO(2). A Riemannian metric g belongs to the conformal class of M iff 4
g(djdx, djcy) = 0 ,
0fm,
3/3*) = 3(3/%,
djdy).
Letting g also denote the complex symmetric extension of the metric, conformality is therefore equivalent to the vanishing of the quadratic differential 0*.»= g(d{dz, 3/3z) tie* .
322 592
J . EELLS
S. SALAMON
Let N be a Riemannian manifold with metric ft, and consider a mapping
1
where
be the corresponding covariant derivatives acting on tp-'TN. ness we also define dtp, dtp by the formula dtp = dz ® dtp
For complete-
+ <J5 ®
I n the sequel we shall frequently identify the fibres of tp- TN and TN in order to write Sip —
ohp + terms in dz?, dz
s
l
is a section of S^T* M®tp~ TN. If tr denotes contraction with g, the tensor T — tr(Vdtp) with values in tp~ TN is called the tension field and represents an invariantly defined Laplacian of the mapping
V
(1.1)
djdzh(d
so (9>*ft) '°= h(dtp, dtp) dz- is a holomorphic quadratic differential. Now we shall call a mapping tp which satisfies (tp*h) - '= 0 conformal; this means that away from the zeros of
+
r
323 TWISTORIAL CONSTRUCTION OF HARMONIC MAPS E T C .
593
s
tp: S ^-N with domain the 2-sphere is automatically conformal. Similarly if tp: M -> N is harmonic with the restriction conformal for some nonempty open subset lL c M, then tp is conformal on all of M. Now suppose that tp is a conformal immersion, and work exclusively with the induced metric g = tp*h on M. I n this case for any vector field X on M, V(
1
where V - denotes the covariant derivative on TN followed by projection to the orthogonal complement (tp^TM) - in TN, I t follows that 1
(V#)(X) = V - > * X ) , and Vdtp can be identified with the second fundamental form whose trace r equals the mean curvature of the immersion. A nonconstant conformal harmonic map tp: M (N, ft) is then the same thing as a minimal branched immersion. Indeed the zeros of
n
1
x'=
o(\z\") ,
3
[GOB]. This fact will enable us to handle the zeros of the differential of
v
v
!
2. - Gauss lifts. Let (T (R") denote the Grassmannian of real oriented 2-dimensional subspaces of R " . Each V E 5 ( R " ) may be identified with the simple 2-vector a = e f\e , where {«,, e ) is any oriented orthonormal basis of V. Therefore 2
2
l
l
2
s
# ( R " ) = {oeA (R"): 2
\\a\\ = 1, a simple}
324 J. EELLS
594
S. SALAMON
1
Alternatively, one can associate to F the complex projective class [v] e CP"- , where v = e, + ie e C". If h denotes the complex symmetric metric on C", then k(v, v) = 0, and this construction identifies (R") with the quadric hypersurface 2
2
n
Q„_ ={ i^=o}cCP'-'. s
The action of SO(n) on R" gives a Riemannian symmetric space description
Any immersion ip: M^R"
defines a Gauss map n
M -* (?„(R ) ,
V
where y,,(m} is the real 2-plane ?>*(T M) translated to the origin. I f
v
X
t
a
X
m
t
x
f• j f - * '§$T&)
Oiq>.
Obviously n°rp =
2
s
°*
{R)
= SO(2)-
S
'
v
t
325 TWISTORIAL CONSTRUCTION OF HARMONIC MAPS E T C .
595
and there is the star operator
2
Now in 4 dimensions the star operator defines an endomorphism of /1 (R^ with and il-eigenspaces A± say. I f {c,, e^, e^, e ] is an oriented orthonormal basis of R then (with appropriate conventions) A* has an oriented orthonormal basis t
4
±
KA^iejAe,, e,Ae ±**A«i>
e,Ae ±e Ae,}.
s
4
2
The action of £ 0 ( 4 ) on each eigenspace gives rise to a double covering (2.1)
0*0(4) - * 80(3) x
80(3),
and
fr,(R
' = SO(2)xSO(2)
= 50(2)
X
80(2) =
S
{
A
+
)
X
8
(
A
~
]
is a product of spheres. Now let N be an oriented Riemannian 4-manifold. Associated to the principal 50(4)-bundle of oriented orthonormal frames is a vector bundle for each representation of 80(4). I n particular the eigenspaoes of * give rise to a decomposition (2.2)
A'TS
= Al?F®
A*_TN ;
let S = ±
8(A*±TN)
be the corresponding 2-sphere bundles of unit vectors. Then fibrewise & (TN) is the product of S with § _ , and there are projections Z
+
p:
a (TN)^§ .
±
2
±
We define subsidiary Gauss lifts 9± = P±°
z
a
x
326 J. E E L L S
500
Jp = e /\e l
• S.
SALAMON
+ 0tA%i Then under the isomorphism
1
A*TW:
TJf® TJf
T* i f ® TJy = E n d (TJF) 1
defined by the Eiemannian metric A, J corresponds to the almost complex structure J on T N with S
Je =e , x
The
2-vector
3
J =—
t
1.
is in fact dual to the so-called fundamental 2-form
=
e)(Z, 1) The
1
Je =e ,
i
J),
X, Ye T N . X
same argument shows that the disjoint union
(S ).U(S_).« +
0(4) P(2)
parametrizes all the almost complex structures on T N compatible with h, i.e. such that h(JX JY) = h(X, Y). Those in S are oriented consistently with N, those in S_ are oriented contrariwise. Suppose that tp: M N is a conformal immersion. F i x m e M with x =
t
+
t
6f(m) = y*(3/5s) = e,— where e Then (2.3)
lf
ie , s
e extend to an oriented orthonormal basis {e e , e , e j of a
lt
y (m) - e f\e ±e Ae, ±
1
2
3
3
T N. a
= ±-.{l± *)(d
s
where ^ ( 1 ± * ) equals the projection to A±T2f. The almost complex structures corresponding to ip (m) are uniquely deterniined by the requirement that tp^m) be complex linear. Using the word holomorphic for this pointwise property, we have ±
PROPOSITION 2.1. A conformal immersion tp: M -> N is holomorphic with respect to both of its Gauss lifts ij> , y>_. +
4
E X A M P L E . T O investigate the Gauss lifts of a map into the sphere JS , it is convenient to identify S' with the quaternionio projective line H P
1
327 597
TWISTORIAL CONSTRUCTION OF HARMONIC MAPS E T C .
as follows. The group 8p(2) of 2 x 2 quaternionic unitary matrices acts naturally on the space H of column vectors; let U denote the underlying complex 4-dimensional vector space. Then Sp(2) leaves invariant a skew form cosA^U, and its action on the orthogonal complement of to in A V defines a 2:1 homomorphism Sp(2) 80{5). Restricting to the subgroup of diagonal matrices defines another double covering 2
2
(2.4)
Bp(l)xSp(l)~+B0(4:)
that coincides with (2.1) at the Lie algebra level (for more details see for example [S ]). Since Sp(l)x8p(l) is the isotropy for the transitive action of 8p(2) on H P , there is an isomorphism 2
1
o
._S0(5) 80(4)
8p(2) —8p(l)x8p(l)
=
of Riemannian symmetric spaces. Using (2.1) and (2.4) it is now an easy matter to identify
CITS') , l
(2.5)
Sp(2) ° * S O ( 2 ) x S O ( 2 ) t T ( l ' = S O i 2 ) x S 0 ( 2 ) = (7(1) x f 7 ( l ) S
'+ —
{ 6 )
S0(5)
gg|gj
(7(2)
—UlDxSpW
and these isomorphisms are compatible with the projection p : Furthermore the isotropy subgroup 8p(l)x (7(1) of 8p(2) defining is conjugate to V(l)x8p(l), so S and S_ are isomorphic as homogeneous spaces. Indeed both are isomorphic to the complex projective space P(U) = C P . I n addition to p : G^TS*) -* S there are distinct projections p^p* +
+
3
±
± f
of Q [T8*) to t
M,
such that p af
m
S0(5) > = 80(2)xSO(3)
is the Gauss map y
x
0
0 : M-U
. Sp(2) — (7(2) '
of the composition 6
S'^+R ,
and p oq> is the Obata normal Gauss map * (&i\y ) [O, E J . Since C P ' and £?s(R ) = Qt complex S-manifolds with certain similarities (for example the same additive cohomology) one might expect the Gauss lifts ^ , ^ _ 2
6
9
a
r
e
+
328 J. SELLS
598
3.
SALAMON
and the Gauss map y# to have sirnilar properties. If y is conformal and harmonic, then
3. - Almost Hermitian manifolds. In this section we review some standard facts concerning lT(m)-structures, but from a new point of view whieh will be developed in the sequel. Let N be an almost Hermitian manifold of real dimension 2M. This means that N has a Riemannian metric ft and an almost complex structure J satisfying k(JX,
JY) = h(X, T ) ,
X , Y e TN ,
and the tensors h and J taken together reduce the structure group of the tangent bundle TN to 80[2n) n GL(n, C) = TJ{n). As is customary, we write (TNf
=
a !
T>'"N®T - N
where T'- N — {X — iJX: X e TN} is the i-eigenbundle of J, and T^N — TwN its conjugate. Then ft has type (1,1), so T^N is totally isotropic and a -*• A(<%, •) defines an isomorphism a
(3.1)
T*'»N
^(T'-tN)*.
If { « ! , c c „ } is a unitary basis of T'^N so that Afce*, &,) = d , call kt
we shall
n
F = — i$>'A«* i
the fundamental 2-vector of N; it is invariantly defined and dual to the 2-form OJ(X, Y) = h{JX, Y). For the type decomposition of the exterior algebra of TN, we use the notation r
(A TNf=
©
T'-'N
B+a-=r
where T>«N
5
<>
,
^A*(T -°N)®A''(,T -- N).
329 TWISTORIAL CONSTRUCTION OF HARMONIC MAPS E T C .
599
,r
Note that T'-'N and T'-'N® T' N are both (the complexifications of) real vector bundles. Let V denote the Levi-Civita connection on TN, uniquely determined by the Riemannian metric k. F i x a real vector X e T N, and a unitary basis {cc*} of T'-°N in a neighbourhood of x. If we set a
h(V x , x
h
a,) = l
k l
= —
V^a,),
then (3.2)
V F = - i J [ ( V a ) A a + « A
r
t
t
t
z
a
has (1, l)-component
2 [^is tA«ji— ^*ia*Aa,] = 0. Thus i,ft
PROPOSITION 3.1.
For
any
XeTN,
\
Z
F e T^N
<§> T^N.
The tensor VF is a convenient measure of the torsion of the unitary structure on N. More precisely if V is any J7(w)-connection on TN then V.F = 0 , and WF = (V — VJ-F can be identified with an invariant component of the torsion of v\ B y proposition 3 . 1 , at each point V J F belongs to {T^N®
T^N)®
(T*Nf=
©,e ©a,
where l
B
( j - v i f f ® T > N)® and tSsQ^T^N® (3.1).
T^-N.
(T^N^T^'N)
Here we have made use of the isomorphism
Set
(3.3)
VF = D F + D,F,
I> -P e © „ .
±
0
1
Then i ) , ! and D F represent the irreducible real compononts of VF relative t
to
GT(n,C).
T H E O R E M 3 . 2 . D F = 0 iff the almost complex structure J is integrable, whereas D F = 0 iff the 3-form do> has no component of type ( 1 , 2 ) . t
2
PROOF.
Take a local unitary basis { a } of T'^N and set t
Pi>,i =
so that Pit^—p-itk-
fr(V a*, a , ) , aj
Replacing X by <x, in (3.2) gives DF x
= 0 &
V . ^ E P . ' ,
V>", ft
330 600
J , E E L L S - S. SALAMON
On the other hand, by the Newlander-Nirenberg theorem [SET], J is integrable iff T^N is closed under Lie bracket. This is the case iff — MV„,a*— V a , , a,) = B i
pm—fait
vanishes for all j , k, I. Therefore D F — 0 implies that J is integrable. Conversely if J is integrable, 1
Plkl — pkll — — pkli — — plki — Plik ~ Pi Ik
=
— ptkl
vanishes, and Z ^ P = 0. As for da, we have «*, xi) = (V co)(«t, a,) + (V a>)(£ t BJ
at
t
<x>) + (Vj.wMa,, «*) = (V <w)(«j, a*). 5l
Now
The significance of the vanishing of D F needs no comment. Now if the non-degenerate 2-form to is closed, JV is called symplectic; accordingly when D F = 0 we shall say that 2V is (1,2}-symplectic. Observe however that when JV" is 4-dimensional, the prefix (1,2) is redundant. B y definition JV is a Kahier manifold iff V P = 0; this means that the (restricted linear) holonomy group lies in U(n). The expression «quasi-Kahler» has been used (for instance in [WG]) for (1, 2)-symplectic, but this terminology ia somewhat contrary to our viewpoint in which Kahier should be thought of as the intersection of complex and (1, 2)-symplectic. In order to demonstrate the relevance of D F to the theory of harmonic mappings we first recall a definition. A map
2
S
PROPOSITION 3.3. Let tp: M JV be a holomorphic map from a Riemann surface to an almost Hermitian (1, 2)-symplectic manifold. Then
l
t
331 TWISTORIAL CONSTRUCTION OF HARMONIC MAPS E T C .
601
Hence D F = 0 implies that t
o6 belongs to T'-'N.
9
=
Since $&p = dSw is real, it must vanish.
•
E X A M P L E . Consider the manifold JV = 8' x 8* with the product metric. There is a Riemannian fibration p : JV-i-S formed by following the projection to S by the Hopf fibration k : 8 - * SK Let X be a unit vector field on S and Y a unit vertical field relative to h. An orthogonal almost complex structure J = (J , J " ) can then be defined on J V by letting <7* be the horizontal lift of the complex structure on 8*, and setting J°(X) = Y, J"(Y) — —X. Then J is integrable and gives N the structure of a Hopf surface; p is a holomorphic fibration whose fibres arc elliptic curves [Be, Exp. V I I ] . 2
3
3
1
h
Now JV cannot admit a Kahier metric, so the above structure is not (1, 2)-symplectic. Despite this every holomorphic map M -> ( S xS , J) goes into a fibre of p [ K ] ; and is therefore conformal and harmonic. On the other hand, an example of A. Gray [ E L , § 9.11] shows that the hypotheses of proposition 3.3 cannot be weakened. More to the point, when dimJV>6 maps satisfying the hypotheses of proposition 3.3 will not generally minimize energy. (See the remark after corollary 9.2.) 1
3
Suppose finally that the almost Hermitian manifold JV has real dimension 4. If T\' N denotes the space of primitive (1,1) vectors, i.e. those orthogonal to the fundamental 2-veetor F, then l
a
A*TN
l
l
= (T^°JV© T°' JV)© R F © T - N . a
A t each point the right hand side is the direct sum of three real E/(2)modules of dimension 2,1, 3 respectively. But at the same time there is the direct sum (2.2) relative to the larger group 50(4). Choosing the standard orientation for J V so that F is a section of A\TN, we must have PROPOSITION
3.4.
A%TN = (T^N® *_
A
TS
_ YN T
!
T°- JV)©RF
.
The Levi-Civita connection certainly preserves the subbundle A\TN of A*TN, so for any XeTN, V FeA% TN. Furthermore the fact that F has constant norm implies that V^F is orthogonal to F. I n 4 dimensions one therefore recovers proposition 3.1 from proposition 3.4. z
332
602
J . EELLS
S. SALAMON
4. - Twistor spaces. The results of the last section can be understood more fully by considering the sphere bundles S , S_ over an oriented Riemannian 4-manifold N, no longer assumed to admit a global almost complex structure. For ease of notation and consistency with [AHS] we concentrate on S_c/liJ JV', although with a change of orientation everything will hold for S . Suppose that I L is an open set of JV, and that s: 1 L - * S_ is a smooth section. Reserving the symbol s for the mapping, let a denote the corresponding 2-form denned on I L . Thus a is the fundamental 2-vector of some almost complex structure J on I L , relative to the Riemannian metric h. We shall relate the geometry of the submanifold s(1L) in S_ with properties of the almost Hermitian manifold ( I L , h, J), +
,
+
F i x a j e l L , and consider the tangent space T S _ to S_ at y = s(x). This has a distinguished subspace F consisting of vertical vectors, that is those tangent to the fibre ( 8 _ ) . . The latter is a 2-sphere, and its tangent space at y is the orthogonal complement of the corresponding 2-vector in AtT N. From proposition 3.4 with signs reversed, we obtain an isomorphism t
v
x
(4.1)
T°*N
(F,)
c
which we denote by a^-a". The type decomposition in ( 4 . 1 ) is relative to the almost complex structure J on I L , but in fact depends only on the point y that represents the value of J at x. Consequently there exist well defined vertical subbundles (T -') , (T"- ) of ( T S _ ) which detect the complex structure of each fibre S ^ C P . Proposition 3.1 expresses the fact that the Levi-Civita connection V reduces to the bundle § _ . Given X E T ^ I L , the vector 2
v
S v
2
(4.2)
C
1
X*=s*X-(V
I ( L )
S_
depends only on x and s(x), not on neighbouring values of s. Indeed
is the so-called horizontal subspace which is defined by V at any ys§_, and VzO- represents the vertical component of s , X in accordance with the direct sum (4.3)
T,S_=H,©F . (
333 TWISTORIAL
CONSTRUCTION
O F HARMONIC
603
MAPS E T C .
1
For any yen-' {as), X - ^ 3 £ * = defines an isomorphism T N ~ c * H , and so a subspace {T ^")" of (H ) consisting of (1, 0)-veetors relative to y. I n this way we obtain a horizontal subbundle (2".»)* of ( T S _ ) . Using (4.2) it is now possible to define two very distinct almost complex structures J ,J on the total space S_. I t suffices to give the respective bundles of (1, 0)-vectors which are X
S
c
1
v
C
x
t
1
2
(JT -*)*© < T - T (T -')*© (T ' )"
tfws—
(4.4)
1
0
for Ji for J
1
a
I n other words at ysS-, t7j and J consist of the direct sum of the almost complex structure on H ^ T N defined by y, and plus or minus a standard almost complex structure on V . The section s now becomes a mapping between two almost complex manifolds, namely (IL, J) and (S_, J ) for a = 1 or 2. 2
v
Z
M
t
P R O P O S I T I O N 4.1.
s: (IL, )-> (S_, J )
is holomorphic iff B a = 0.
a
a
P R O O F . If a s T I L is a (1, 0) vector relative to J , then on s(1L) the horizontal vector a* is automatically of type (1, 0) relative to both J, and J , . Thus s is holomorphic iff (V cr)"=a —s*ct has type (1,0) relative to J'„. The result follows from the definitions (3.3) and (4.4). • i
a
For brevity we shall call a holomorphic map into (S_,
2
t
3
lt
s
S
y
t
(4.5)
2
2
R=
tA + B +W
+
+ W_,
where ( is the scalar curvature, A is an invariant, B represents the tracefree Ricci curvature, and W E S ( A * T N ) are the two halves of the Weyl conformal curvature (we use the notation of [S ]). The manifold N is said to be Einstein if JS — 0, and ± selfdual if W = 0. The curvature of S_ is then deteraiined by tA + B + W_, and guided by the Penrose twistor 2
±
a
w
334 604
J.
EELLS
S.
SALAMON
programme, Atiyah, Hitchin & Singer [AHS] showed that J is integrable iff W_— 0. I n this case the holomorphic structure of (S_, J ) depends only on the conformal class of ft, and S_ has become known as the twistor space of if. Equally important for us is the following result (essentially [ S , theorem 10.1]) which brings the Riemannian structure of S~ more into the picture. t
t
2
T H E O R E M 4.2. Let N be selfdual, so that ( § _ , J ) is a complex manifold. Then fT ' )* is a complex analytic subbundle of 2"**S_ iff i f is Einstein. x
1
0
Sow suppose that i f is an Einstein selfdual 4-manifold. The resulting short exact sequence 0 -j.
1
l
i a
(T *y*-*-T ><'§_->{T ' y->Q
defines a complex analytic 1-form on S_ with values in the line bundle (T '°)*. Provided ( ^ 0 , this makes S_ into a complex contact manifold. With the same hypotheses, Rawnsley [R, section 10] shows that there exists a Riemannian metric k on S_ making (S_,k,J ) almost Hermitian and (1,2) symplectic. The most important cases are those in which i f is a Riemannian symmetric space, and these are covered by [WG, theorem 8.13] (see section 9). 2
z
P R O B L E M . Let
5. - J„ holomorphicity. From now on i f will denote an oriented Riemannian 4-manifold and M a Riemann surface. I n general i f will not admit a global almost complex structure, so it makes no sense to talk about holomorphic maps
+
±
±
x
1
(5.1)
c
l
(
similarly for y . +
If {e
t
e ,C8, 2
1
Tt ',
e j is a local oriented orthonormal basis of
335
TWI8TORIAI,
CONSTRUCTION
O F HARMONIC
MAPS
E T C .
605
spanning q>{M), then
2
0
ri: =CK-ie )©c(fi -ie,) 2
3
Th" = C(e,— ie,) © C(e + 3
«,).
We shall continue to work with S_, although all the results of this section are equally valid with all signs reversed. L E M M A 5.1. PIT *].
J
1
1
P R O O F . Given a 2-vector a e tp- §_, n(a) = m, there exists an oriented orthonormal basis {e,, e,, e , e,} of T^°N with 3
y (m) = e^e^ + e f\e , +
3
t
0 = e^^— e^/se,
(cf. (2.1)). Then y {m) + a = 2e f\e , represents a 2-plane in T N invariant by the almost complex structure
1
1
ffm)
+
e
c
Given any map tp: JW — i V , the vector bundle {tp-'TN) over the Biemann surface M has a natural complex analytic structure described by Koszul-Malgrange [KM]. Local complex analytic sections s are characterized by the equation (5.3)
ia = V * m
= 0. 1
c
Indeed the complex structure on the total space of {q>- TN) is obtained by «adding > > the almost complex structures of the base and fibre, using the splitting determined by the Levi-Civita connection V. This makes the zero section a complex submanifold and its normal bundle, isomorphic to (tp-'TNy itself, is complex analytic. I t follows from (5.3) and is well known that tp is harmonic iff dtp is a local complex analytic section of (
!
T H E O R E M 5.2. A conformal immersion tp: M^N is a complex analytic subbundle of {tp-'TN) .
c
is harmonic iff T%*
c
P E O O F . Since tp is conformal, dtp spans T'fn T'_i" (see (5.2)). Now T'f is complex analytic iff it is closed under the application of 8. If this is the case, then Sdtp e T\", so by reality $dq> = 0 and tp is harmonic. Conversely suppose that tp is conformal harmonic, and take a local unitary basis {oc, (3} of T'* with at. = 3
336 606
J . E E L L S - 3. SALAMON
T%', the seoond because ftfo, 5fi) = — h{8x,
= 0
h(p,5f}) = i5h{fi,f}) = 0. Thus
•
c 2*r».
Given an immersion tp, there is a natural map
Moreover if tp is conformal, i maps the canonical section [da] of -P(T£°) onto the Gauss lift y_. The following result is then a re-interpretation of theorem 5.2: T H E O R E M 6.3. An immersion tp: M^-N is J j holomorphic.
is conformal and harmonic iff
PROOF. L e t oe TlMjW-'A^TN) be the fundamental 2-vector denned by CT has type (1,1) relative to (5.1). Exactly as in proposition 3.1, we have ba = B
where 2^° = A*(Tt ),
V oeF_?®TV, 3ISl
and in analogy to (3.3) we can write OCT — 0,CT + d ff , 2
2
0
where t^ff = ((3CT)^, S a — (OCT)I'. Here and in the sequel ( component of type (p, q) relative to (5.1). How s
denotes the
1
($LM3/3*) = (f* 3/ar) +
(OCT)"
(cf. (4.2)), so as a combination of propositions 2.1, 4.1 we deduce that ip_ is J holomorphic iff (i) tp* is holomorphic relative to tp_, and (ii) S„a — 0. Condition (i) is satisfied iff tp is conformal. Suppose this is the case. B y (2.3), a
a — — ic(l — *){dtpA&
337 TW1ST0HIAL CONSTRUCTION
O F H A R M O N I C MAPS E T C .
607
and by proposition 3.4, !
1
<5 = _ 2tc(o «p£ Ao? l(7
(5.4)
o o - = — 2ic dtpMdocp) : • 1 0
2
Since h(5tp, (daV)-°) = M&p, <5o>) = 0, 8, a = 0 iff 0?)™ = 0. This holds iff the real quantity Shy vanishes, i.e. tp is harmonic. • When JV = R * is Euclidean space with its fiat metric, S at R * x 8 and the traditional Gauss map of a conformal immersion tp: J t f - > R * is given by 1
±
y = [n,of ,
(5'5)
v
+
ji,oy_) 2
(see section 2). B y convention the projection J I : ( S , J ) - > S is antiholomorphic, so one recovers from theorem 5.3 the result that tp is harmonic iff y is antiholomorphic [Ch!]. As another special case, suppose that a; is a holomorphic mapping from a Biemann surface Jif into an almost Hermitian (1, 2) symplectic manifold JV. Then there exists a global section FeT{N, S ) with D F = 0, and by proposition 4.1, ip — Fotp is J holomorphic. Proposition 3.3 then becomes a corollary of theorem 5.3. I n the general situation a conformal map tp is " rendered holomorphic» by the almost complex structure tp on tp~ TN. We shall call a smooth J holomorphic map from a Biemann surface into S or S_ a „ holomorphic curve. Given a nonconstant conformal harmonic map tp: M ->JV, its Gauss lifts y , are both <7 holomorphic curves; by remarks in section 1 this is true even at the isolated points where
±
2
v
+
+
S
2
l
±
t
+
+
2
2
±
±
C O R O L L A R Y 5.4. The assignment tp—>tp is a bijective correspondence between nonconstant conformal harmonic maps tp: M^*N and nonvertical J, holomorphic curves ip: M-*S . ±
As a corollary one therefore obtains in addition a bijective correspondence between the J holomorphic curves in S and those in § _ . This is significant since the manifolds S and S_ are generally distinct. A local existence theorem for holomorphic curves in an arbitrary almost complex manifold has been given by Nijenhuis & Woolf pSTWJ, See also [Gr]. 2
+
+
P R O B L E M . F o r compact manifolds the regular homotopy classes of smooth immersions (two being equivalent iff they are homotopic through
338
60S
J.
EELLS
S.
SALAMON
immersions) have been classified by Hirsch and Smale [Hi; Sm]. One can define analogously the regular homotopy classes of branched immersions w: M - * JV of a surface. When does such a class contain a minimal representative, i.e. a conformal harmonic map? Not always. I f M has genus 2 , there is no nonconstant conformal harmonic map tp: M^-T* into a fiat torus. For its Gauss map y would determine two meromorphic functions on Jlf of degree 1, in violation of the Riemann-Eoch formula. B y way of contrast, every homotopy class of maps ia*-* T* has a harmonic representative minimising energy. v
6. — J
l
holomorphicity.
Up to now orientation has not played an important role; we have been able to formulate results by working with just one of the twistor spaces § + , S _ . For example given a map
PROPOSITION 6.1. A conformal immersion tp: _3f-*-iV is totally umbilic iff both y , 9>_ are J holomorphic. +
t
P R O O F . From the proof of theorem 5.3 and in particular (5.4), $L is J holomorphic iff (d^^Aoip = 0. Now s
M(d
(6.1)
t
L
0,
1
so (d a>)"f has no component proportional to 8tp, and {d^tpY^A&p = 0 iff 2
(o 9>)2:'= 0. Similarly for oj . so at a given point +
(6.2)
t
holomorphic iff b"*tp e T ± ° . 1
Both are , holomorphic iff b"*tp e T^"<~\ T _i"= C dtp. defines totally umbilic for a conformal map. •
The latter
A mapping tp: M^-N from a Biemann surface into a Biemannian manifold with metric h is said to be real isotropic if (6.3)
h(d'tp, 8'tp) = 0 ,
Vr, « > 1
relative to any complex coordinate on Jlf. This just means that the dif-
339 TWISTORIAL
CONSTRUCTION
OF HARMONIC
MAPS E T C .
C
609
N
ferentials d'
a
E X A M P L E . For N = 8 or C P " , it is known that any harmonic map q>: t 5 - > i f must be real isotropic. For 8" this was proved by Calabi [C,] who called real isotropic harmonic maps 4 pseudo-holomorphic ». The crucial point is that a Biemann surface of genus 0 admits no holomorphic differentials, and it suffices to show inductively that 5h(d
r
PROPOSITION 6.2. A conformed immersion
PROOF.
is real isotropic iff
t
Suppose that cp is real isotropic; so,
(6.4)
h(d
h(d*
Then {dip, d*q>} span an isotropic subspace, and at a given point me M either d*
+
t
2
2
c
lmj
r
ft(o>, dip) = 0 = h{6 ip, d*
is conformal and harmonic, then by theorem 5.2 the line
is complex analytic in both 2'+° and 2'^". The second fundamental form of L in is determined by the component of (o ^)^* orthogonal to dip, 2
340 J. EELLS
610
- S . 3A1AMOJJ
or more invariantly by the form 3
(6.5)
m
= dz ®
(o>A(o > & ° )
3
e F(M, E ®
T?).
e
B
Here K denotes the canonical bundle [T'- M)* of M and as before, T £ = /l (T^°). Note that pi does not depend upon the choice of coordinate s on M. a
±
L E M M A 6.3. An immersion (p: M -^-S has fi± = 0 iff
T
PROOF. >^
o , i
n
T
8 0
2
Consider f_ for definiteness. Let /J be a non-zero vector in 2 - o , i c ^ y S C f S . (See (5.2).) Using (6.1) and (6.2), t h a t
f_
=
3
1
is J , holomorphic iff h^d ?)*: , /?) = 0 .
But
and
the last term vanishes iii
— 0.
•
A mapping y. J f - » - § is said to be horizontal if each image ip*{T M) is contained in the horizontal distribution R defined by (4.3). Since J and J coincide on S, if f has two of the properties J , holomorphic, J holomorphic, horizontal, then it has the third. I n this case one can say that yi is horizontal holomorphic, the distinction between J , and J being unnecessary. For example, by theorem 5.3 and lemma 6.3, a conformal harmonic map
m
x
t
2
2
±
T
PROPOSITION 6.4. If y. M^N is a conformal harmonic map with JV ± selfdual and Einstein, then fi is complex analytic in the sense of theorem 5.2. ±
PROOF.
I t is necessary to show that
-1
c
where V denotes the Levi-Civita connection on (ip 2'JV) . Since cp is harmonic, Sdtp = 0. Put p = (o^)^ . Then from the definition (6.5) of /i it remains to check that relative to the almost complex structure f , 1
±
±
3
o((<5W) = 8d
341 T W I S T OK I A L CO N S T R T J C T I O N O F H A R M O N I C M A P S E T C .
611
0
h(fi, o/3) = 0 imply that (ojS)^ is proportional to dip. Now. o
0
> = — (68 - d~d)(d
where It = tA +W is the curvature tensor of JV" (see (4.5)). The constant curvature operator A is essentially the identity, so certainly A{dq>, 5
W (d
1
has no primitive (1, l)-component (i.e. no component in TJ' relative to p ) . Consequently (W {ikp, 8
±
Suppose in addition to the hypotheses of proposition 6.4 that ip is real isotropic. Then by proposition 6.2, if ft (m) 0 for some me M, /i — 0 on a. neighbourhood of m. I t follows that either ft = 0 on M or p\__ = 0 on M. Let 3 £ = J£__(itf, JV) denote the set of horizontal holomorphic curves M->$ , and ~ the equivalence relation that identifies two curves in X u J6_ having the same projection tp in JV. If the curves are distinct then one is the other is ip_, and by theorem 5.3 and proposition 6.1, tp is totally geodesic. Combining corollary 5.4 with the above remarks yields T
±
+
T
T
+
THEOREM: 6.5. Let JV be ± selfdual and Einstein. There is a bijective correspondence between real isotropic harmonic maps tp: Jtf->JV and the set (3& V 3e_)/~. +
4
3
1
Euclidean space JV = R has twistor space S = C P — C P ;
+
v
!
+
+
1
For the sphere N = S , real isotropic harmonic maps are called superminimal by Bryant [Br], and such a map ip is said to have positive or negative spin according as 0$. is horizontal. Indeed the forms p,_ ft are closely related to a cr in [Br], and the prefix « super * refers to the vanishing of the quartic differential h{6-ip, 6*q>) dz*. The case of 8 will be examined in more detail in section 8. More generally, if 2V is ± selfdual and Einstein, it follows from theorem 4.2 that there is no local obstruction to the existence of horizontal t
lf
2
l
+
342 J. EELLS
612
s.
SALAMON
holomorphic curves in § . The analyticity of /i is then a reflection of the complex contact structure of . Conversely if JV has X ^ 0, the curvature tensors B and are severely restricted. However there are instances of 4-manifolds JV not satisfying the hypotheses of theorem 6.5, but for which 36 5* 0 (see the example following proposition 3.3). T
±
T
T
R E M A K E . The following characterization has been given by Friedrich [ F , proposition 5]. A map
(
+
c
T„ N-^ M
9
*(T M),
{
C
Ci
of parallel translation T along g?(c) with the orthogonal projections are conformal. (
7. - The case of 3-manifolds. I n this section we shall state without proof a theorem which is based upon results of the two preceding sections. For more details we refer the reader to [ B , S,]. Suppose first that JV is an oriented 4-dimensional Riemannian manifoid containing an embedded 3-manifold JV'. As usual set 2
and in addition let S = S(TN') denote the bundle of unit tangent vectors to JV'. If v denotes the oriented unit normal to JV' in JV, then any I E S defines elements p (XAv) ±
= i(l±*)[X/\v)
e S
±
.
In this way we can identify S with the restriction of both S and §_ to iV'. Moreover if cp: M^-N' is an immersed surface, then +
,
where
2
±
343 TWISTORIAL CONSTRUCTION OF HARMONIC MAPS ETC.
613
Splitting
as in (4.3). The horizontal space S contains a distinguished 2-dimensional subspace H' equal to the orthogonal complement of the vector y, and we define a distribution 77 on S by y
y
/7 = ir;©v v
Since H' , V are oriented 2-planes, they admit natural almost complex structures, and in analogy to (4.4) there exist tensors v
A
J GiT(S, End/I) , 0
a =
1,2,
satisfying J\ — — 1. Given a Biemann surface M and an immersion q>; M^N', say that its Gauss lift is i7„ holomorphic if ip*{TM) ell and J dy Associating
T H E O H E M 7.1.
we shall = i &p.
There is a bijective correspondence between
(i) nonconstant conformal totally umbilic maps M^-N' J holomorphic curves J f - j - S ;
and nonvertical
x
(ii) nonconstant conformal harmonic maps M^-N' holomorphic curves M—> S.
and nonvertical J
2
I n this set-up the Gauss lift ip is horizontal iff
2
The subbundle m»
=
c
{ « E 7 7 T J j s = ioc] c
(TSf
is always closed under Lie bracket; curvature provides no obstruction because the horizontal part of 77 has only 1 complex dimension. This means that (S, cTJ is an integrable CE manifold; that was in fact exploited by LeBrun [Le] in a conformally invariant setting to furnish examples of nonrealizable OR manifolds. Although twistor CR manifolds exist in higher dimensions [ S ] , a 3-dimensional base guarantees that 77 has real codimension 1. When N' = R is Euclidean space, S fibres over the twistor space T '"CP used by Hitchin to study monopoles [Ha]. s
3
l
l
344 J. EELLS
614
S. SALAMON
Although (S, <7) is not integrable, theorem 7.1 does show that J , holomorphic curves exist in abundance. The distinction between J and J in this regard is best appreciated in terms of the Levi form. F i x a nowhere zero 1-form 2
t
2
s
2°«to*dx'
y =
i = i
i
on S annihilating the distribution IT; x are local coordinates on 2V' and a, are suitable fibre coordinates on TN. The Levi form of (S, i/,) is the Hermitian form L( ,f}) X
= dy( J), X
«,0e77M,
and is nondegenerate with signature ( + 1 , - 1 ) . This imposes stringent conditions on the existence of J holomorphic curves. For example such a curve y>: Jlf-s- S satisfies y*y — 0, and so has a null tangent vector: x
<7.1)
L{6 ,
&y>)=0.
V
On the other hand dy has no component of type (1,1) relative to J so (7.1) is no extra condition on the tangent vector of a J holomorphic curve. lt
t
S. - Spinors and degrees. We resume work with an oriented Riemannian 4-manifold JV. A section of S over an open set 11= c JV determines an isomorphism of the twistor space S„| with the associated complex projective bundle P(T+ Ui), by the proof of lemma 5.1. However for a more invariant description of this type one must resort to the so-called spinor bundles. +
,K
e4Jt
The homomorphism (2.4) exhibits 8p(l) xSp(l) as the universal covering Spin (4) of SO(4). Regarding the quaternions H as a right H-module and a left H-module respectively gives the isomorphism of modules H © H ^ R * corresponding to (2.4). To avoid the confusion between left and right, it is more convenient to treat H as a complex 2-dimensional vector space. I n this case we may write H
(8.1)
C
H® H^(R*) , C
Where the right-hand side is the eomplexiilcatiou of the basic SO{4)-module. Complex conjugation on the left is given by a ® 6 = ?a®?6, and a typical
345 TWISTORIAL
CONSTRUCTION O F HARMONIC
MAPS E T C .
615
real element in (8.1) can be represented by complex matrices as
This is the decomposition of a vector (right) into the product of spinors (left); for more details see [S ], 2
Now suppose that i f is a spin manifold, which means that its structure group can be lifted from SO(i) to Sp(l) xSp{l). Then associated to (8.1) are complex rank 2 vector bundles A , A _ such that +
(8.2)
A ® A_^(TNf. +
C
Given « e A _ , » ^ 0, n(u) = x, (8.3)
W=
(A ) ®Cju
u
+ x
c
defines a maximal isotropic subspace of (T N) which must be the space of (1, 0)-vectors for some almost Hermitian structure on T N. With the correct orientation convention, the corresponding fundamental 2-form belongs to S_. Since W depends only upon the projective class [u], this argument establishes x
x
u
(8.4)
S_-P(ZL),
and similarly with the opposite signs. Taking exterior powers of (8.2) gives related isomorphisms {A* TN) ?± 8"-A . The pullback TU—-A_ over the total space P(A_) contains a tautologous complex line subbundle £ whose fibre at [u]eP{A_) is the subspace Cu. The fibre of its conjugate or dual £ ^ £-» can be identified with the complementary subspace Cju. I t follows from (8.3) that the horizontal bundle of (1, 0)-vectors on the almost complex manifold (S_, JJ (a = 1 or 2) is C
±
±
(yi.o)"
^ n * A
+
® £ .
Consequently {T*>»y^A*{n*A ®l)~l*, +
and these expressions can now be substituted into (4.4). Using the same symbol C to denote the tautologous line bundle over S , and omitting ® . for ease of notation +
IA^@?
for
J,
346 616
J . EELLS
S . SALAMON
Even if N is not a spin manifold, (8.5) can be established by choosing a spin structure locally. I n particular the bundles £ , are unambiguously denned over S and independent of the choice of spin structure. We shall give (8.5) a group theoretic interpretation in the next section. 2
±
PROPOSITION 8.1. For any oriented Biemannian 4-manifold if, the first Chern class of the almost complex manifold ( S , J ) is zero. ±
s
P R O O F . B y general principles [Hir, theorem 4.4.3], the first Chern class of I " ' ° S
A>W-°S ) ±
±
relative to J% equals that of
m A*(&^®
r
^©
A (t6^)®
A*-*(¥) ^M%A*)®
C
An identical argument gives
MC*);
the right hand side is four or two times an integral cohomology class according as i f is spin or not. For the remainder of this section we suppose that cp: M^>2? is a nonconstant conformal harmonic map from a compact Riemann surface into the 4-manifold if. Define the twistor degrees d , <2_ of
2d = ±
($&0§m,
2
£ being the bundle of (1, 0)-vectors tangent to the fibres in either S or §_ relative to J , Thus d is an integer whenever i f is spin. Identifying H*{M, Z) c*Z, we have +
%
L E M M A 8.2.
±
2A
±
=
B
c,(2^ ) =
^(T*?).
PROOF, The second equality follows immediately since T^." = A^T'^") is the determinant bundle of Tlf. From proposition 8.1,
B y definition of
± and (5.1),
The lemma follows.
•
347 T W I S T O R I A L C O N S T R U C T I O N O F HARMONIC MAPS E T C .
617
From theorem 5.2 and its proof, L =
r?r\
T'J°
is a complex analytic subbundle of both and T'_!_" relative to the KoszulMalgrange structure on (ip- TJV) . Given a complex coordinate z on M, L is spanned generieally by dtp =
C
X = dz® dip is complex analytic. Thus XeH^K®!,) where K is the canonical bundle of M. If p is the genus of M, # = 2 — 2p the Euler characteristic, and r = |A| = the ramification index of
2
ord,(A)
then
0 < r = c (K®L)
= -
l
x
+c (L). 1
0
Now c^X) = c^T^ ) — c , ^ ) , where Q =n*jL ±
is the quotient. Note that <2_ = <3 (e.g. by (5.2)) and the real vector bundle underlying Q or Q_ is the normal bundle of
+
c
i s
+
l t 8
PROPOSITION 8.3. The twistor degrees of a conformal harmonic map tp: M->2? from a compact Biemann surface satisfy d= ±
l~p
+ \r±\e
.
When the 4-manifold JV is ± selfdual there is by proposition 6.4 in addition to X, a complex analytic differential f^=
m®
(orpA (0 W )
e H°(M, K*®
F*).
If x e M is a zero of dip of order k, then d
IftJ =
2 r
s
+ ±
for some integer s±>0. Provided ^ is not horizontal, fi± is not identically T
348 618
J . EELLS
3. SALAMON
zero and by lemma 8.2, 2r + s = c (K° ® T\f) = ±
-Z +2d .
x
X
±
Combining this with d + d_ = 2 — 2p + r +
(proposition 8.3) and picking one sign for definiteness gives PROPOSITION 8.4. If
d_ = p — 1 — } s .
+
+
BEMARE:. If i f is selfdual and Einstein, and
where is the (constant) scalar curvature of N and A{tp) is the area of the map
9. - Maps into S*.
The spinor description of the last section is best appreciated by considering the twistor space _ +
=
8p{2) L7(1)XSJ>(1)
=
1
of i S ' ^ H P (see (2.5)). If £mG, ^ _ M C " now denote the basic complex representations of 17(1) and Sp(l), then the basic representation decomposes as Z®l®A_^C* under the action of the isotropy subgroup !7(1) xSp(l). The tangent space T „ S at the identity coset can bo read off from the isomorphisms +
(9.1)
sp{2) ^8*(£®
C ® A_) ^8*(£®
t) © flM_© { £ © t)A_
m«(1)©
sp(l)®
(CA_® IA_)® ({*©
p).
349 TWISTORIAL
CONSTRUCTION OP HARMONIC
MAPS E T C .
C
1
619
a
Thus T S = H @ F , where ^ ^ | d _ @ & L and F ^ C © ^ are the horizontal and vertical subspaces. Because the isotropy representation ZT©F has precisely two irreducible real components, there are exactly 2 = 4 jSp(2)-invariant almost complex structures (see [BH]). These are of course ±J, and ±J as defined in (8.5), and J, is the standard complex structure of C P . The integrability of J follows from the formula 0
+
s
2
3
t
A^AJ^C
2
1
which implies that the subspace CA_® C of sp{2) is closed under Lie bracket. There are also important Lie bracket relations concerning J ; namely if 2
a = u(l)©sn(l) 0
ai
=tA-®¥
a,=
CA_®^,
then [a-j, a,] c a ,
k = i + j (mod 3 ) .
k
Thus if w denotes a primitive cube root of unity, the transformation 9 of sp(2) which acts on a as yit times the identity is a Lie algebra automorphism with d = 1. Observe that on the tangent space ( 2 S ) = a ® a t
3
,
C
0
+
t
lt
=-l+^j .
(9.2)
B
t
A homogeneous space tJ/Zf for which the Lie algebra g = A © m admits an automorphism 6 with 6 = 1 and h = ker (0 — 1) is called 3-symmetric [ G J , Therefore C P has a 3-symmetric structure arising from J . Let n denote the projection C P ga S ->- £ . I t is also convenient to identify S_ with C P ; in this case the projection S_^S equals aon, where a is the orientation reversing antipodal map of S [Br]. Any invariant almost Hermitian metric on C P (relative to J or J ) is a constant multiple of s
3
t
3
4
+
3
4
4
3
x
k =7i*h t
2
v
+th ,
where ( > 0 is a constant, and V is the induced metric on the vertical space (2 -°© T°- )°. The next theorem then follows from results of Wolf & Gray [WG, theorems 8.13, 9.4], ,2
2
350 J. EELLS
620
T H E O R E M 9.1. manifold.
• S.
SALAMON
3
1) For a unique value t = („, (CP , k , J , ) is a Kahier u
3
2) For any ( > 0, the almost Hermitian manifold ( C P , k , J ) is (1, 2)symplectic. t
2
a
Part 2 is related to proposition 8.1 which implies that C P has an £ P o stmature. Indeed if a> JX,
Y) = k (J,X,
2
t
Y)
denotes the fundamental 2-form for J the (3,0) component of ow trivializes the canonical bundle for J . This phenomenon also occurs with the sphere S*Q^ G^SJUS) which is another 3-symmetric space. More generally, 3-symmetric spaces are classified in [WG; theorem 7.10]; as explained in [S ], many consist of twistor bundles over Biemannian symmetric spaces. Note that an invariant almost complex structure can be denned on any 3-symmetric space by using (9.2). Combining proposition 3.3 and theorem 5.3, we obtain Bi
I>(
t
s
1
C O R O L L A R Y 9.2. If
t
B E M A E K . Hot every holomorphic map tp: M^S into an almost Hermitian manifold is a minimum of the energy functional E even if S is (1,2) symplectic. For instance, take iV = (CP , J ) and let ip be the Gauss lift of a conformal harmonic map M^S* which is not real isotropic. Then tp is <7 holomorphic but not J holomorphic; we conclude from [ E W J that tp is not an J5-minimum. I n particular, in corollary 9.2 unless ^ is horizontal its energy is not an JJ-mimmum. Any harmonic map
2
S
x
±
+
s
c
c
3
e+= 1 ® 1 ® 1 e_=
4s(j®l®l
+ 1® j ® l + 1®!®)').
351
T W I S T O R I A L C O N S T R U C T I O N O F H A R M O N I C MAPS E T C .
621
Identifying e , e_ with the row vectors ( 1 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 1 ) defines an isomorphism S ' f f g = H relative to which q = a+jpe Sp(l) acts as the matrix +
!
X = W&{—<xtf + Jdt/3 ) S
(3|«|»-
a
where a, (S e C, omorphism
+ |/9| = 1. Since XX i: Sp(l)
T
2}a + ) ( 1 - 3 M » ) p * i -
= 1, we obtain an explicit mon-
^8p(2).
The 7-dimensional homogeneous space Sp(2)ji(8p(l)) has irreducible isotropy, and has strictly positive sectional curvature [B]. Given any element ee8 W, let N denote the subgroup of Sp(2) which preserves e up to a complex multiple, so that 8p(2)jN C P Next consider the subgroup U(l) = { « e C : |a| = 1 } of Sp(l); since 8p{l)IU(l) s ^ C P , i induces a map C P - * C P for any e such that i ( I 7 ( l ) ) cN . But cce P ( l ) acts on S W with eigenvalues a , a , a, a and respective eigenvectors e , e+f, e_, e_j; thus e must be proportional to one of the latter Taking e — e gives embeddings 3
e
3
t
1
1
S
t
3
3
3
+
x
y> : CP' -* C P
3
±
which are denned explicitly by the rows of X. I n terms of the inhomogeneous coordinate z — f}a~ on C P and homogeneous coordinates on C P , L
1
3
3
3
(z)
=
_(z)
= I — V § g , V3z ,1
w+
(l,z ,V3z,—V$z ) 2
w
— 2\z\ , {\z\ — 2)z). 2
3
L E M M A 9.3. The curve yi is horizontal holomorphic, vihereas y>_ is only J holomorphic. +
PEOOF.
I f n denotes the standard representation of f7(l) c 8p(l), sp(l) ^ 8Hn
The differential (y> )+: T j C P
«{1)
1
2
© ( i f © ij ).
3
3
C = y, in ( 9 . 1 ) , so that
then
^ C P is determined by the substitution
+
A^=r)®ij
s
352 J, EELLS
622
1
S. SALAMON
2
Decreeing T J ^ C P a< i) and using (8.5), we see that yi is horizontal hoiomorphic. A similar argument holds for y>_. • +
By construction,
1
= a°?i°ip_:
+
C P -s- H P ' ,
where n: (2„, z z , z ) -?• (z -\« + js ), and a is the antipodal map sending a quaternionic line to its orthogonal complement. Consequently tp is isotropic harmonic and we can identify y = y . Just as y> is essentially the Veronese curve in C P , so tp is the Veronese surface in S' [ E W , , section 8]; that interrelationship has been studied in detail by Rawnsley. Lemma 9.3 generalizes to give various harmonic maps C P - a - H P - , « > 2 , [S ]. Prom theorem 4.2 the distribution (2"'»)* of horizontal (1, 0) vectors in C P is complex analytic. Indeed, Bryant shows in [Br] that given meromorphic functions /, g on a Riemann surface M, lt
2
3
0
2
3
±
±
3
+
1
3
3
is horizontal holomorphic, and that /, g can be chosen to make ip an embedding when M is compact. The projection tp — 7ioy>; M -*• H P is then an isotropic harmonic or « superminimal» immersion. Taking / = — 2z , g = V3z on C P gives ip — yi (9.3). The canonical bundle of (CP , J ) is isomorphic to C* (cf. proposition 8.1), so c,(£) is the positive generator of Zf (CP , Z). I t follows that the twistor degrees of a conformal harmonic map
3
1
+
3
x
2
!
l
d=
degy .
±
±
For an immersion with only double points, the Euler characteristic e = c{Q ) of the normal bundle equals twice the self-intersection number (cf. [LS]). +
4
PROPOSITION 9. 4. If tp: jH->-S is a real isotropic harmonic immersion which is not totally geodesic, then \e\>2p + 4. PROOF. Reversing orientation if necessary, we may assume that tp is horizontal holomorphic. If
2
+
1
+
353 TWISTORIAL CONSTRUCTION O F HARMONIC
1
S.
Therefore $
+
623
MAPS E T C .
is full and from proposition 8.3, 3 < d = l — p + ie .
•
+
In the above proof, the twistor degree d can be identified with ljin times the area of
2
2
l
P R O B L E M . For any 4-manifold JV two immersions 8*->N are regularly homotopic iff they are homotopic as maps and have the same normal class in Zf (iS , Z) [Hi]. Which classes can be realized by minimal immersions? 2
2
10. - Riemannian submersion formulae. This section is a continuation of the last; by studying the fibration n: C P -> 8* we shall introduce the notion of complex isotropy for maps of surfaces into Kahier manifolds. Accordingly we focus attention on the Kahier metric ft = ft, on C P . Let V denote the Levi-Civita connection on C P corresponding to ft, and as usual V denotes the Levi-Civita connection on H P . We shall generally use a, a' for basic vector fields on C P and /?, /J' for vertical fields; the former are ji-related to vector fields on H P which we denote by the same symbol. Thus 3
3
3
1
3
1
a = hor (a -f /?)
f3 = vcr (a + p) 3
are the components of x + /? corresponding to T C P = H®V (4.3). Since the fibres of C P are totally geodesic, the Biemannian submersion equations of O'Neill [ON] give 3
1) (10.1)
vertV^a') =
hor(V «') a
2) hor (9„/J)
V
3) h o r ( V )
ff,
= AJ
A x' a
4
354 624
J . EELLS
S. SALAMON
where A is the tensor denned by i „ K ' - 1 T « [«,«'],
k{AJ,oc')
1
+ MP, A,* )
=
0.
How A measures the obstruction to the integrability of the horizontal distribution H, and is essentially the curvature of C P as a fibre bundle. Actually A P defines a P(2)-invariant element of A S*®V (cf. [ 8 „ proposition 3.2]), but we shall only need 3
!
a
L E M M A 10.1.
l
E,
then
A a'e(T**y.
A-«.'=0,
PROOF.
c
If a, a' are tangent vectors belonging to {T -°yc
a
Extend a, x' to basic vector fields so that ver (V a') = A-a'= ;
— A .x = — ver (V .«) . x
a
3
For any X E T C P , V_, preserves the J , type decomposition. Since the extensions are of type (1, 0) to first order along horizontal directions,
A a ' e (T^fn (r°' )*= {0}. I
;
!
Similarly A tx'e (T -°y.
•
t
l
Suppose that
3
is an immersion, and let ip: M-.-CP Set
dip = x + /3,
0
xeH ,
denote
^eP*
3
Thus a, fi are really sections of ^ " ' ^ C P , but in order to use (10 1) it is convenient to extend x to a basic vector field and § to a vertical field on C P - We can then write x = 6q>, and tp is conformal iff « e ( T ' » ) \ B y theorem 5.3 tp is also harmonic iff (is (T'- )", and in this case a and /? aie both (1, 0)-veetors relative to J . I t is instructive to prove corollary 9.2 directly for the case ( = t . For the remainder of this section we shall use superscripts to indicate type decompositions relative to the standard complex structure J , on C P . First suppose that tp is conformal so that x ' — 0 (if ip — a ° = a^ in previous notation); then 1
,
1
T
a
3
0 1
(Sd y-'= r
(V- (x +S
+ p>> =
il
•
1
355 T W I S T O E I A J . C O N S T R U C T I O N O F H A R M O N I C MAPS E T C .
1
0
625
1
Hence nor (ooy)°' = ^-(/J - ) which vanishes by lemma 10.1, and y> is
ver ( o o »
1 , 0
v
= e r ( V . a ) = A-ot = 0 + e
which proves that i/> is harmonic relative to k. l
T H E O B E M 10.2. A conformal harmonic map q>: M^-S iff the Gauss lift ij> satisfies r
(10.2) PEOOF.
k{d x, 6'f?) =
0
.
is real isotropic
Vr, s > 0 .
Firstly, dx = V „ « = V a + Aj + p
is a (1, 0)-vector for J , implies that t
s
= 6'tp +
a
so belongs to (T'-")\ AJ
Aj
But A ps(T -')" B
which
= - (o»°.i
thus hor ( o » = hor ( V ^ ( a + /?)) = o > + 2 J [ J =
(6*
0+
Now o^y = da -f o/? with dx horizontal, so if (10.2) holds then 0 = £(hor d*ip, hor 6*ip) = — 2k({d
2
1
!
and
s
0
=
= 3
is proportional to a, and at each point of C P , span {6'a: r>0] = Cx . Moreover span{o'i5: s > 0 } = CAj®
C/J,
356 J . E E L L S - 3. SALAMON
626
Aa{l
being the horizontal component of 6$, and (10.2) follows from the
orthogonality condition
Given a mapping ip: M^N manifold N with 0
from a Biemann surface itf to a Kahier
y = « + p \
x,r3eT\"N,
the notation l
(D'yyi = (V')'y = d'- a (D")'V> = (V")*ic = S - ' / J is often used. If \p satisfies (10.2) which means that the D ' and D" osculating spaces are orthogonal, then ip is said to be complex isotropic [ E W , definition 5.5; B , section 8]. Since (10.2) implies (6.3) (with tp in place of
3
A
+
2
+
2
deg §_ = 2 — 2p + r — deg p . +
Any harmonic map I S ' - J - C P " , n>l, is necessarily complex isotropic, as is any harmonic map I ^ - s - C P " of degree 0 from a Biemann surface of genus 1 [ E W , , section 7]. PROPOSITION 10.3. isotropic, then
If
1
is conformal, harmonic, but not real
— 3(p — l ) < d e g ^ < p —1 . ±
P R O O F . Since 8* is conformally fiat and neither proposition 8.4 is applicable with either sign. •
^_ is horizontal,
The only known examples satisfying the hypotheses of proposition 10.3 are minimal immersions in S [In] composed with the totally geodesic inclu1
357 TWISTORIAL C O N S T E U C T I O N
O F H A R M O N I C MAPS E T C .
627
sion S*c S*. I n this case tp_ can be identified {see section 7), and will not be horizontal unless tp is totally geodesic. Except in the latter case, tp is not real isotropic, and f is far from being complex isotropic in the sense that its D' and D" osculating spaces each have their maximum possible 3 dimensions. Putting r = 0 — e in proposition 8.3 gives deg ^ = 1 — p. I n particular any branched minimal immersion of a surface of genus zero in S must be a great 2-sphere [A; O J . ±
±
3
The techniques of this section are applicable to other Riemannian manifolds JV admitting a Kahier twistor space. If N is compact and 4-dimensional, the only possibilities are S* and C P [ H ] . The complex projective plane C P is selfdual, and the corresponding fibration S_ -> C P will be discussed in section 12. More generally one can take JV to be a 4n-dimensional quaternionic Kahier symmetric space with positive scalar curvature (there is one for each compact simple Lie group [W; S,; S ]). Provided tp: M^N is inclusive in the sense that each
s
2
2
3
m
11. - Kahier surfaces.
Throughout this section, we suppose that the Riemannian 4-manifold JV is Kahier, so that it has an orthogonal covariant constant complex structure J. Given a mapping
Ap
=
a
+/j,
a, fie
T'-'N.
Hence
is real isotropic iff h(6a,df3) =0,
P E O O F . The first assertion follows from the characterization (6.4) of real isotropy. Now suppose that h[6x, /J) = 0. Differentiating h{a, /J) = 0 gives also ft(a, 6(3) = 0. But a, /3 form an orthogonal basis of T'^N where
358 828
E E I X S - 3.
J.
S A L A M O N
they are both non-zero, so span {8'a: r > 0 } = C a span{o'/J: s > 0 } = C 0 , and cp is complex isotropic.
•
From section 6 we know that, roughly speaking, real isotropic harmonic maps tp: M -> JV are those for which one of the two Gauss lifts y_ is horizontal. To assess the possibilities, we first express the twistor spaces of the Eahler surface JV as complex projective bundles. Below, C denotes the trivial complex line bundle, and T H E O R E M 11.2.
There are
isomorphisms
S ^P(T*.°JV@Cj +
(31.1) S_^P(2^°iV) relative to which the Gauss lifts of a conformal
immersion
tp: 3f-s>JV are
(11.2) f- = [«] • P R O O F . First note that (11.2) makes sense even at points where one of a, /J vanish. For ^ is taken to be the projective class [1, 0] where fi = 0, and tp_ is the line orthogonal to [p3] where a = 0. The fundamental 2-vector of JV is a horizontal section of the twistor space S . The proof of lemma 5.1 then gives S . ^ P f T ^ J V ) . Indeed, given a e S_, JI(CT) = %, we have +
+
F = e,Ae, + e,Ae,,
a = e,A<*2 — e,/\e,,
in some orthonormal basis, and a corresponds to the projective class [ « ! — M j ] . B y (2.3) and proposition 3.4, 9- = — *e(aA« — PAft)o , where c is a positive normalizing factor, and the subscript 0 denotes the primitive component of the (1,1) vector. Since P + y _ is proportional to a A « , c?_ corresponds to [a].
359 TWISTORIAL CONSTRUCTION OF HARMONIC MAPS E T C .
629
If T E T*>*M and u e C , the projective class [r, w] detomines an element 2
1
1
i(wf — ru) + | (||T|[ — (MI ) J E / l * 2 7 f
(see proposition 3.4 again), which after normalization lies in S . We leave the reader to verify that this induces an isomorphism P ( I ' ° J V © C ) ^ S , Putting T = aA/5, M = ||/S|| , gives a 2-vector proportional to +
, 2
+
S
2i(aA/5 - « A 0 )
+ ( H
a
a
- ll£ll )-F = ft* + *) 3 f A %
whose normalization equals
•
The isomorphisms (11.1) are related via (8.4) to the representation theoretic formulae
A_ = L® T'-'N ,
L * = T*-'N ,
for the spinor bundles of an almost Hermitian 4-manifold (see for example [ S , section 7]). Using (11.2) it is easy to check properties of the Gauss lifts. For example cp_ is J holomorphic iff the line [a] is stable under o; i.e. x/\$x = 0. This is actually equivalent to the equation 6x = 0, thereby illustrating theorem 5.3. Moreover a
s
C O R O L L A R Y 11.3. A conformal harmonic map
t
C O R O L L A R Y 11.4. A conformal harmonic map as: M—>N has $ horizontal iff li ll/H/?ll constant. If N is Kahier-Einstein with nonzero Ricci tensor, that constant is 0,1, or oo. +
a
PROOF.
!
Since h(8a, a) = o(|[a|| ), we have a
d(xAp) = dx/\P = \\x\\- -H\\4*)xAP-
360 630
9. S A L A M O N
J . EELLS !
Therefore [aAft ||ft| ] is stable under S iff i«ii-M
w^sam.
=
which is equivalent to <J(|«|/||fl) = 0. If ||a|j/||/3|| is some coustant other than 0 or oo, then some multiple of T = x/\P is covariant constant and (11.3)
R{6
where R e 8-(T -'N) is the ourvature tensor of the Kahier manifold JV. The space TJ^jV of primitive vectors acting as a derivation annihilates T ^ J V , whereas F acts as the identity. Consequently in (11.3) R can be replaced by the Ricci form p to yield p(a, a) = p(ft (5). If Q is a non-zero multiple of the Kahier form at, then | | « | * = ||ft|*. • The values oo, 0,1, of ||a||/||/3|| correspond to tp holomorphic, antiholomorphic, and totally real respectively. I n the latter ease, J(tp+T M) is orthogonal to tp+T^M. We remark that one can define [CW, E T G ] the Kahier angle & at a point where tp+ 0 by m
9
oot(i0 )-H|/||ft|, p
O<0,<«.
That plays the same role as the basic function k^. J t f ^ R of Lichnerowioz [ L i , section 17], denned by fc = <>",
p
V
is a homotopy invariant of the map tp. I t may be that no multiple of w" represents an integral cohomology class. I n contrast, the Ricci form q represents 2it times the first Cbern class e (2 -°JV) of JV, Accordingly given a map tp: M-*N from a compact Riemann surface, we consider the integer ,1
1
M 2
The next result appears in [ E T G ] for immersions into C P ; in this case o = 3 deg?; since the first Chern class of C P is 3 times the positive generator of H ( C P , Z ) . The more general proof below is due to J . H . Rawnsley, A
v
2
2
361 T W I S T O R I A L C O N S T R U C T I O N ' OP H A R M O N I C
MAPS E T C .
631
and is based upon a calculation of the twistor degree d_ using lemma 8.2 and proposition 8.3. T H E O R E M 11.5. //
e<2p-2.
a
PROOF.
The Gauss lift ij>_ determines a splitting c
(
Th"® Tt
1
(6.2), in addition to the type decomposition l
c
1
(
1 a
a
ip- T - N'®
relative to J. GenericaDy the components a,/? of 5w span a negatively oriented maximal isotropic subspace containing dip, which is therefore T]f Hence a, /5 generate line bundles [a], [/?] satisfying 9
-
1
T
i,«
N
=
[«]©[£],
Ti"=
[«]©$}.
Furthermore a = \de®ot\ = — x + <>i[a]>r>0 b = \az®p\
=
- -°iffl>r>o, x
and so x
+
r
- e
1 0
= 2d_=c [T i )^
2
1
X
+ « + b,
c^T^N)
= a- b.
Therefore X +e
+e = v
(r-b)-b^0
X + e— %/— (r — a) — a < 9 , and putting % = 2 — 2p gives the result.
•
The last three lines also give 2 d = x + T + e<0; +
this inequality was proved independently by "Webster [We, theorem 3], and used to deduce that any embedded minimal 2-sphere in C P is a complex line or conic. See also [ E T G , theorem 4.7; G L , theorem D ] , 2
362 632
J . EELLS
S. SALAMON
2
E X A M P L E . The case of C P will be covered in depth in the next section, but first consider at the other extreme a Kahier surface N with zero Ricci form. This means that the bundle S is flat, and in particular that 7? is — selfdual. If we also suppose that N is simply connected and compact, then it is a £ 3 surface endowed with the Tau-Calabi metric [ H J . I n this case S is naturally a product N x *S , and j¥ is said to have a hyperKahler structure because each point al -f bJ + cKe S (a + b + c = 1) defines a Kahier metric. +
!
+
2
2
2
2
Since c (T > N) — 0, any conformal harmonic map
a
satisfies
t
e<2p —2 . This was obtained independently by Poon [ P ] , using integral representations of the characteristic classes. I n analogy to (5.5), tp has an antiholomorphic Gauss map y = 7 t ° y , where 7r is the projection S - * - 8 . Thus y is constant iff tp is holomorphic relative to one of the complex structures al -\-bJ -f cK, in which case one may say that tp is hyperholomorphie. 2
a
2
+
2
+
?
P R O B L E M . Is every real isotropic harmonic map tp: M^-N hyperholomorphic? This amounts to asking whether
2
2
12. - Maps into C P . 2
1
The projective holomorphic tangent bundle P(I"'°CP ) of C P can be identified with the flag manifold F = 77(3)/?J(l) x 17(1) X T7(l). Labelling the ?J(1) factors in the isotropy by the digits 0,1, 2, let ? > £u tt e
363
T W I S T O K I A E
C O N S T R U C T I O N
O F H A R M O N I C
M A P S
E T C .
6 3 3
denote the corresponding complex 1-dimeusional 17(1) modules. M(3)
(Co®Cx® t*)® ( £ , L ) ^ « ( 1 ) ©
Thus
© «(1)© ™ ,
where >n m ( C f * © & & ) ©
® U*)®
(CoC,©
Ui)
can be identified with the tangent space to F at the identity coset. The three real subspaces of ** are the vertical spaces of respective projections jip, J T , , J I : F -^-CP . To be more precise, define a nonintegrable almost complex structure J on by 2
S
(12.1)
T*>*F =
U ,
for J .
For each i there is an identification S_^F for which n, is the twistor projection that identifies J with the almost complex structure J, of {4.4). B y general principles F admits 2 = 8 invariant almost complex structures and exactly 3! = 6 of these are integrable [ B H , chapter 4]. F o r example, there exists a unique complex structure J „ for which x is holomorphic and J t is antiholomorphic: 3
0
a
2
(12.2)
T^F = & & ® £ i & . ®
for J
0 !
.
I n fact J coincides with the structure J of (4.4) with respeet to %: B y contrast J is up to sign the only invariant structure which is not integrable, and makes F a 3-symmetric space, as explained in section 9. Let ip: M -> F be a map, and in terms of a local coordinate z on M, suppose that y>(z) is the flag corresponding to an orthogonal sum o
s
x
3
C =
3
where = jr,°y(z) is a line in C . Let d = djdz denote componentwise differentiation in C . s
L E M M A 12.1.
ip is J holomorphic iff
d(
0
?(?>,) c G9 © ? > , t
2
d{cpz)
cf ®
a
P E O O F . The component of d[g>,) in {*# j ) can be identified with the component of the tangent vector ys^d/dz) in c m. •
364 J. E E L L S
634
S. SALAMON
The inclusions in lemma 12.1 can be represented by a triangle:
(12.3)
Equivalently one could reverse the direction of the arrows, and replace 9 by S = djdz. B y corollary 5.4, there is an essentially bijective correspondence between J holomorphic curves in F and conformal harmonic maps into C P . Given a J holomorphic curve ip: M-+F, the three projections !
ft =
Ti.aip:
M^-CP*
will all be conformal and harmonic. Conversely if we start with a conformal harmonic map (p =
V
T H E O R E M 12.2. A conformal harmonic map
2
has two «trans-
9
Take a local lift /: % - * C , The M, of
3
9t=
[, /> a / - < 9 / , / > / ]
(12.4) ?>*=[,
f>Bf-<,Sf,f}f],
provided
a
<po
3 T-
s
9^
—
•
Consequently
01
2
365 T WIS TOR I A L
C O N S T R U C T I O N O F H A R M O N I C MAPS E T C .
635
for the projection J T , and by corollary 11.3,
!
t
B
tt
1
2
1
2
C O R O L L A R Y 12.3. There is a bijective correspondence between full complex isotropic harmonic maps M - > - C P and the set O x { 0 , 1 , 2 } . A
Combining the above facts with theorem 6.5, we conclude that the real isotropic harmonic maps into C P consist of the holomorphic, antiholomorphic, associated, and totally real ones. The latter are yet to be classified. The fact that C P has constant holomorphic curvature implies that globally defined forms 3
2
3
ds ®(aAdoL),
da*®0/\6p) l
associated to a harmonic map
analytic. The
P = h{doc, i% dz
s
is the cubic differential introduced in [ E W , section 7] and studied in detail in [CW] and [Wo]. (Chern and Wolfson call
2
e = 4 — ip + (r + s ) > 4 — 4p . +
On the other hand, proposition 11.5 yields e +3|deg9>|<2p — 2 , and in particular (12.5)
|deg
(cf. [ E W , proposition 7.8]). 2
EXAMPLES.
Consider the pararnetrization
i%m=&*> A i]
366 636
J . EELLS
8. SALAMON
1
of the Clifford torus in CP Take a complex vector = ?/?f 4- $S/$K on M= T , -where m is to be determined. Applying (12.4) gives 3
and the orthogonality of tp„
$,,= [—we", r o ' A ! ] • These transforms give essentially the same now follows from the formula Stp,c tp ® tp,.
3
i s
map. The harmonicity of q< The above representatives of the tangent vector dtp. Since for similar examples. 1
P R O B L E M . Does there exist a conformal harmonic map 2** -4 CP which is not real isotropic? Such a map has degree 0 by (12.5), and r = 0 = e by proposition 8.4 and theorem 11.5. +
The Veronese map
1
2
CP -'CP
is given by
a
[1,», z ] 2
[5(1 +2|*] ), \z\'-l,~z(2
4-1*1*)]
?!.== [8% 5, 1] ,
and
PROPOSITION 12.4. / / tp: M--CP degree d_= 1—p + J r — J e, then
is conformal harmonic with twistor
2 deg tp, = — deg f — 2d„ 2 deg tp = — deg
PROOF. 0 1 1
Put tp = tp, and deg tp,. There are complex line bundles -f such that Co © Ci © Ca is trivial, and *=-(V*0i(C*))lJfl.
367 TWISTORIAI,
CONSTRUCTION
O F HARMONIC
MAPS E T C .
637
2
B y (12.1) the vertical bundle (T -")" for tbe projection n equals by lemma 8.2
so
0
2d_ = — a\ + 4 . Tbe result now follows from the equation <2„ + a\ + d = 0.
•
2
Finally, if
deg
—2— r
deg fa = — 2 deg
+ r.
BF.MARK. The ideas of this section are also applicable for studying maps M ->* CP- for arbitrary n. I n place of F one can first consider the flag manifold
V(n + l)j
17(1) x P(l) x U(n —
1),
which also has an almost complex structure J for which lemma 12.1 holds, except that rp is now a map into the Grassmannian (?,,_, ( C " ) &e G ( C ) . Once again, J holomorphic curves correspond to conformal harmonic maps into C P " , but they also correspond to inclusive conformal harmonic maps in the quaternionic Kahier manifold G ( C " ) (see the end of section 10). + 1
3
N + 1
2
T
+1
!
P R O B L E M . Let JV be a compact simply connected 4-manifold. A theorem of Thorn asserts that every homology class a e 3 {N) can be represented by an embedded closed oriented surface. The minimum genus of such a surface is not yet determined; however, not every class can be represented by an embedded 2-sphere. Given Biemannian structures on M and JV, which classes a can be represented by branched minimal immersions? Is there a lower bound for genus M in terms of the twistor degrees? For instance, if JV= C P and a — ay where y generates U ( C P ) , then is genus jtf>(o —l)(o —2)/2! t
2
A
2
REFERENCES [A] [AHS]
AiMGREN F . J . , Some interior regularity theorems jor minimal surfaces and
an extension of Bernstein's theorem, Ann, of Math., 84 (1966), pp. 277-292. ATTTATT M . P . niTCHiN N. J . SINOEII I . M.: Self-duality in four-dimensional Riemannian geometry, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A , 362 (1978), pp. 425-461.
368
6 3 8
J .
E E L L S
S.
S A L A M O N
[ B ]
B E R G E R M., Les varietes riemanniennes homogenes normales simplement connexes a courbure strictement positive, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa C I . Sci.,
[Be]
Sem. A . Besse ( 1 9 7 8 - 7 9 ) , P . Nathan ( 1 9 8 1 ) .
[BH]
B O R E L A. H I R Z Amer. J . Math.,
15
[Br]
( 1 9 6 1 ) ,
pp.
1 7 9 - 2 4 6 .
E B R U C H
80
Geometrie
riemannienne
Characteristic pp. 4 5 8 - 5 3 8 .
P . ,
( 1 9 5 8 ) ,
R, L . , Conformal and minimal the 4-sphere, J . Differential Geom., 17
immersions pp.
B R Y A N T
[Cj]
C A L A B I E . , Minimal i/m/mersions of surfaces ential Geom., 1 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , pp. 1 1 1 - 1 2 5 .
[Cj]
C A L A B I
S. S - , On the minimal curvature. Problems in
S. S. J . Math., 105
J.
[ E S ]
E E L L S
10
Soc,
( 1 9 7 8 ) ,
E E L L S
J. J .
E E L L S
J.
2
A
]
296
in Mathematics,
maps.
pp.
twistorielles
( 1 9 8 3 1 ,
Harmonic
H . ,
J . C , Maps
Amer.
Anniversary to appear.
Bull. London Math.
pp.
des applications
harmo-
6 8 5 - 6 8 7 .
mappings
of Biemannian
manifolds,
1 0 9 - 1 6 0 .
of minimum
J . C , Harmonic
W O O D
J .
H .
equations
( 1 9 8 4 ) ,
49
maps pp.
( 1 9 8 3 ) ,
T R I B U Z Y
of minimal
T . ,
pp.
energy,
J . London Math.
Soc,
R .
D E
surfaces
from surfaces
to complex
projective
2 1 7 - 2 6 3 .
A.
G U A D A L U P E
in
O P , Math.
2
I .
V . ,
Ann..,
The
funda-
270
( 1 9 8 5 ) ,
On surfaces in four-spaces,
( 1 9 6 5 ) ,
pp.
varieties
H I R S C H
R .
D.
7
manifolds
( 1 9 7 2 ) ,
pp.
O S S E R M A N
of surfaces,
Amer.
M. W . , Immersions
2 4 2 - 2 7 6 .
and almost Hermitian
manifolds,
Michigan Math.
2 7 3 - 2 8 7 .
A . , Biemannian
G U L L I V E R
Ann. Glob. Analysis and Geometry,
2 5 7 - 2 8 7 .
A . , Minimal
12
G R A Y
pp.
J.
( 1 9 6 4 ) ,
Adv. in Math.,
mersions [Hi]
frames,
3 0 3 - 3 1 0 .
ferential Geom., [GOR]
d'aire 5 9 - 8 1 .
5 7 1 - 5 9 8 .
G R A Y J.,
86
W O O D
by moving
into three-manifolds,
S., Constructions
Acad. Sci. Paris,
pp.
P R I E D E I C H
[ G , ]
J . Differ-
1-68.
S A M P S O N
E s C H E N B U R G
pp.
pp.
Math.,
J.
E E L L S
mental
[ G
R .
( 1 9 8 1 ) ,
spaces.
[F]
surfaces
L . , A report on harmonic
S A L A M O N
C.
Amer. 2$
[ETG]
Minimal
G . ,
branched immersions
L E M A I R E
J.
niques,
[EWj]
D .
5 9 - 8 3 .
J . , Gauss maps of surfaces, in Perspectives of Oberwolfach 1 9 8 4 , Birkhauaer. J . , Minimal
[EW,]
pp.
E E L L S
E E L L S
[ESa]
spheres,
Ph.
immersions of the two-sphere in a space of consAnalysis, Princeton University Press ( 1 9 7 0 ) ,
J.
W O L F S O N ( 1 9 8 3 ) ,
E E L L S
]
in Euclidean
maps.
2 7 - 4 0 .
C H E R N
[EL]
2
and harmonic
Quelques applications de Vanalyse complexe aux surfaces Topics in Complex Manifolds, Univ. de Montreal ( 1 9 6 7 ) , pp.
C H E E N
pp.
[ E
into
C H E R N S. S., Minimal surfaces in Euclidean space of N dimensions, in Differential and Combinatorial Topology: Symposium in honor of Marston Morse, Princeton University Press ( 1 9 6 5 ) , pp. 1 8 7 - 1 9 8 .
tant
[EJ
surfaces
I,
4 5 5 - 4 7 3 .
E . ,
minima.
[ C W ]
of compact
( 1 9 8 2 ) ,
B U R S T A L L F . E . , Non-linear functional analysis Thesis, University of Warwick ( 1 9 8 4 ) .
[Chj]
Cedic/
4,
classes and homogeneous spaces
[Bu]
[Chi]
en dimension
with geodesic symmetries
of order
3 ,
J . Dif-
3 4 3 - 3 6 9 . R .
-
R O Y D E N
J . Math., of manifolds,
95
H.
L . ,
( 1 9 7 3 ) ,
A theory of branched impp.
7 5 0 - 8 1 2 .
Trans. Amer. Math. S o c ,
93
( 1 9 5 9 ) ,
369 TWISTORIAL CONSTRUCTION OP HARMONIC MAPS E T C .
[Hir]
H I R Z E B E U C H F . , Topological
Methods
in
Algebraic
Geometry,
639
3rd edition.
Springer, 1966. [H,]
HITCHIN N . J . , Compact
four-dimensional
Einstein
manifolds,
J . Differential
Geometry, 9 (1974), pp. 435-441. [H,]
HITCHIN N . J . , K&hlerian
Proc. London Math. Soc, 43 (1981),
twistor spaces,
pp. 133-150. [H ]
HITCHIN N . J . , Monopoles
[K]
pp. 579-602. KODAIRA K., On ike structure of compact J . Math., 8 8 (1966), pp. 682-721.
[KM]
KOSZUL J . - L .
3
and
Comm. Math. Phys.,
geodesies.
MALGRANGE B . , Sur
complex
certaines
analytic
surfaces
structures
fibrees
83
(1982),
II,
Amer.
complexes.
Arch. Math., 9 (1958), pp. 102-109. [LS]
LASHOP R .
SMALE S., On the immersion
of manifolds
in Euclidean
space,
Ann. Math., 6 8 (1958), pp. 562-583. [L,]
LAWSON H . B . , Complete
minimal
surfaces
3
in S ,
Ana. of Math.,
92
(1970),
pp. 335-374. [LJ]
LAWSON
H . B . , Lectures
on
Minimal
Submanifolds,
2nd edition, Publish
or Perish, 1980. [Le]
[Li] [M] [N]
L E B K U N C. R . , Twistor
CB 'manifolds
and 3-dimensional
conformal
geometry,
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 8 4 (1984), pp, 601-616. LICHNEEOWICZ A., Applications harmoniques et varietes hakleriennes. Symposia Mathematica, 3 (1970), pp. 341-402. M I C A L L E F M . J . , Stable minimal surfaces in Euclidean space, J . Differential Geom., 19 (1984), pp. 57-84. NAITOH
H . , Isotropic
submanifolds
with parallel
second
fundamental
form
in P*"(c), Osaka J . Math., 1 8 (1981), pp. 427-464. [NN]
NEWLANDEK A.
N I R E N E E R G L . , Complex
analytic
coordinates
in
almost
[O]
complex manifolds, Ann. of Math., 6 5 (1957), pp. 391-404. NLTKNHUIS A. W O O L F W . B . , Some integration problems in almost-complex and complex manifolds, Ann. of Math., 7 7 (1963), pp. 424-489. OBATA M., The Gauss map of immersions of Biemannian manifolds in spaces
[ON]
of constant curvature, J . Differential Geom., 2 (1968), pp. 217-223. O ' N E I L L B . , The fundamental equations of a submersion, Michigan Math. J . ,
[NWJ
1 3 (1966), pp. 459-469. [F]
POON Y . S., Minimal
surfaces
in four-dimensional
manifolds,
M. Sc. Thesis,
University of Oxford, 1983. [R]
[Ru] [RV]
[S,]
RAWNSLEY J . H . , [-structures, f-twistor spaces and harmonic maps, in Geometry Seminar Luigi Bianchi I I , to appear. R U H E . A., Minimal immersions of 2-spheres in 8', Proc Amer. Math. Soc,
28 (1971), pp. 219-222. R U H E . A. - V I L M S J . , The tension Soc, 1 4 9 (1970), pp. 569-573. SALAMON S., Quaternionic
Kahier
field of the Gauss map.
manifolds.
Trans. Amer. Math.
Invent. Math., 6 7 (1982),
pp. 143-171. [S ] 3
SALAMON S-, Topics in four-dimensional Biemannian geometry, in Geometry Seminar Luigi Bianchi, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1022, Springer (1983),
pp. 33-124. [S ] s
SALAMON S., Harmonic
Bianchi
I I , to appear.
and
holomorphic
maps,
in Geometry
Seminar
Luigi
370 640 [Sin] [STJ] [WJ [WG] [Wo]
J . EELLS
S. SALAMON
SMALE S . , A survey of some recent developments in differential topology, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc, 69 <196&}, pp. 131-145. SACKS J . U H L E N B E C K K., The existence of minimal immersions of twospheres, Ann. of Math., 113 (1981), pp. 1-24. W O L F J . A., Complex homogeneous contact manifolds and guaterniome symmetric spaces, S. Math. Mech., 14 (1965), pp. 1033-1047. W O L F J . A. GRAY A., Homogeneous spaces defined by Lie group automorphisms I, II, J . Differential Geom., 2 ( 1 9 6 8 ) , pp. 77-159. WOLFSON J . G., Minimal surfaces in complex manifolds, P h . D . Thesis, University of California Berkley ( 1 9 8 2 ) .
The text also contains last minute references to the following relevant preprints, which have recently appeared: [G-L] [Gr] [We]
GAUDUCHON P. LAWSON H. B., Topologieally nonsingutar minimal cones. GROMOV, M., Pseudo holomorphic curves in symplectic manifolds. W E B S T E R S . M., Minimal surfaces in a KShler surface.
University of Warwick Mathematics Institute Coventry C V 4 7 A L , England University of Oxford Mathematical Institute 2 4 - 2 9 St. Giles' Oxford 0 X 1 3 L B , England
371
JEELLS
Certain variational principles in Riemannian geometry 1.
INTRODUCTION
Consider the following two loosely formulated problems: [PI)
iWhen
can
a given
Riemannian
metric
be deformed
into
a best
metr-ial
For instance, we can ask when a given manifold admits an Einstein m e t r i c ; or one of prescribed sectional or Ricci curvature.
Or when can i t be embedded
in another Riemannian manifold with prescribed properties (as in the problems of Minkowski and Weyl). Often such problems lead to a Monge-Ampere equation of the form det v" $ = 1)1, for a given function IJJ. (P2)
\Given
deformed
into
a map if/'.H * M between a best
two
Riemannian
manifolds,
when can
$ be
map"!
For instance, harmonic maps are reasonable candidates for being best.
There
are others, however. In both problems, "best" means an extremal of a geometrically v a r i a t i o n a l problem.
significant
Our objective is to exhibit large interrelated c l a s s e s
of such. If
$:M •+ N i s a map between two Riemannian manifolds (M,g) and ( N , h ) , we
define: (i)
i t s first
fundamental
farm d>*h, a symmetric 2-covariant tensor f i e l d on
H; y
(ii)
i t s second
fundamental
form
B ( * ) = V $, a symmetric 2-covariant tensor
f i e l d on H with values in the induced tangent bundle $ TN. In l o c a l c h a r t s ,
subscripts on $ denoting covariant d e r i v a t i v e s .
46
Reprinted from Cordero: Differential Geometry (Research Notes No. 131) by permission of Longman Group.
372 We are interested
in various variational principles associated with inte-
grals of the form F(o>) = j f (S(*),<|>*h)v ,
integration with respect to the
g
volume element
over compact domains of M.
Following a program i n i t i a t e d in [16, i l ] , we now look at special constructions with substantial geometric content. o:R
m
Given a symmetric function
4 F (m - dim M), we define the function o{**h) : M * R which at every
point of M assigns the o-function of the eigenvalues g.
of **h with respect
to
Then tm
j °(**h)\>
a
(i.i)
g
i s a f i r s t order functional of the maps *:M * N; s i m i l a r l y for the second order functionals of the form
n U) 0 t f
| f( (e(*)))v , 0
(1-2)
g
once we have c l a r i f i e d the meaning of the integrand. Remark 1 —
Of course, we can define the k
t h
fundamental form B. (<j>)
.
U 2 3)
K
of a map *:M -> N as the k y 7 where k
(V *)(v,,...,v ) = k
order symmetrized iterated covariant d i f f e r e n t i a l
E oE5
(v\)(v
o ]
,...,v
),
k
and develop the variational theory of $(&.{$}.)<• Remark 2
In much of what follows we could allow nondegenerate metrics of any
signatures. Remark 3
We can formulate our variational principles for sections $ of
Riemannian fibre bundles [ 3 8 ] , We s h a l l not proceed in any of those directions now. 2.
ENDOMORPHISM INVARIANTS
Let V be an m-dimensional real Euclidean vector space and A:V -* V a s e l f adjoint endomorphism. 1
I f (X^)-,^—, denotes the spectrum (with m u l t i p l i c i t i e s )
of A and o^F " - F a symmetric function,
then
47
373 o(A) - <j{x
...xj
(2.1)
i s a well defined real number depending only on A. A well-known theorem of Newton (for polynomials) and Glaeser [18, 24] states that any reasonable symmetric function • i s a function of the element: R " * R (0 < p < m), with the convention that 1
ary symmetric functions
0
p
The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c polynomial of A i s m
i,
t
det {A - XI) = I ( - I ) V k=0
k
(A.,...,X_)X
K
m
=
n (x. - x ) . 1=1 1
A induces s e l f - a d j o i n t endomorphims P
P
A A : A V * A V, P
0 < p < m,
•with A°A = the i d e n t i f y transformation of A°V = R . s i s t s of the (™) numbers (x, . . . X , ) . , . 1 p 1 "* P <
<
< i
s f f i
P
The spectrum of A A conThus
p
P
P
o-,(A A) = Trace A A = o ( A ) .
(2.2)
In p a r t i c u l a r , Trace A^A = X . . . . X , 1 m
det A
and P
n
p
(det A A) (det A " A )
(det A > V .
In terms of an orthonormal base ( e ) i
1 < i < | n
(2.3) of V we have the matrix represent-
ation ( a ^ ) of A; then
<*
P f l ) e
a
(i)
(j) O)
(
J
)
e
(j)'
summed over a l l s t r i c t l y increasing p-tuples ( j ) with 1 S J Here 3 ( j
i
s
T
[8].
n
a
t
( A ) P
1
< ... < j
p
£ m.
min°»* of A determined by the (i)-rows and (j)-columns
I t s trace °
48
t
= pT"i ..ip r
J
l
J
P
374
It
i s convenient to normalize the polynomials o ,
setting
p
we have Newton's
Vi V i with e q u a l i t y i f f -I/m
inequalities
5
p
2
,
5
X, = . . . l
.
"
m
No.
p
n
e
n
p
51] (2.5)
Furthermore,
i f A is
non-negative,
then v
~
the adjugote
T
= o /(p).
'
X„. m
-1/2
We d e f i n e
p
-
[20,
o
l
o f A to be t h e endomorphism A : V * V o f
o r i e n t e d E u c l i d e a n space V, g i v e n by t h e
7
the
composition
1
A ™A where * d e n o t e s t h e Hodge d u a l i t y isomorphism. base o f
R e l a t i v e to an orthonormal
V, the m a t r i x o f A has e n t r i e s which a r e t h e c o f a c t o r s o f
A is
self
t h o s e o f A.
a d j o i n t , and
[2.7)
More g e n e r a l l y , we have A A p
d e t A f> 0,
p
P
* as an endomorphism o f A V .
If
then p
P
A A = (A A"')det A A p
so
m
*~ ( A ~ A )
P
and
det A A
(det
(
A) p-l'
that P
c (A A) k
o (A A
p
k
Apparently, general
_ 1
,m-1 ) o/pV,
1 < k £ (J).
f o r m u l a s f o r a. (A A) ( i n terms o f t h e
p symmetric f u n c t i o n s ) a r e not known e x p l i c i t l y . The q*^ Newton endomorphism X^fA) : V + V associated
elementary
K
1
X (A) n
=
I
j
M) o
J
,{A)A .
to
A is defined
by
(2.8)
49
375
Equivalently, X (A) 0
X q C O can be d e f i n e d
i n d u c t i v e l y by
- I,
X (A) q
0 q
(A)I
- X
,(A).A.
Then
q o (A) q
o,(X
0
(A) -
X (A)
,(A.X
t
(A));
(m - q ) a ( A ) ;
= 0 (the
Cayley-Haniilton theorem).
The s p e c t r u m o f X ( A ) c o n s i s t s
of the m numbers
q
O t h e r Symmetric F u n c t i o n s Next,
define
the
symmetric f u n c t i o n s
n det(A - X I ) to
summed o v e r a l l m Z
k
i •
1
n i
)X
m
k.
m-tuples
{i.,...,i
.
(2-9)
) of non-negative
integers
such t h a t
Then
3
o
r
" V l
w
1
+
a
r-Z"2
'
•••
+
H
)
\
Setting ,,m + k -
V V
1
k
11
h
we have S c h u r ' s i n e q u a l i t i e s
50
(X ,...,X
obtain •••\,
j=1
k
E n k>0
2
— — X - x.
1-1
n ( k > 0) by the f o r m u l a
[20,
No.
220]
°-
(2-10)
376 with equality i f f X,
...
S, £ »| < . . . < S j For k a non-negative
X ; and i f A i s non-negative,
/k
S ... .
k
- P U,
k
Aj
k
(2.12)
integer, polarization gives m
p
then
m
k
X - o,(A i
).
Then [9]
D
p
+
k " k-l°1
+
(
"
, ) k _ 1 ( 5
l°k-1
+
t
_ ,
)
k | t o
°>
r
1
-
k
- ** (2.13)
+ 1
Writing Uj - ( - 1 ) ^ o j ,
I s j < ra, we obtain
k(r. + . . . + r P
k
£
- 1)! S
r
r, r u.' . . . I I / ,
k k l ,
(Z.H)
!
i1 ••• •*.' m
summed over a l l m-tuples ( r .
r_] of non-negative
integers with
m I i r , = k. 1=1 1
2 We have Liapounoff's inequalities [20, No. 1 8 ] , p^ < P _ j P k
equality i f f
...
k +
| . with
X^.
B i l i n e a r Haps I f g denotes the inner product of V viewed as a b i l i n e a r form on V, i t s nondegeneracy provides an inverse l i n e a r map g ' : V" + V.
Now any symmetric
b i l i n e a r form 8 : V* V- R has a canonical interpretation as a l i n e a r map V - V*; consequently composition g
the
° B i s a s e l f - a d j o i n t endomorphism of V, with
51
377
o(B)
•(g"
1
» 6).
(2.15)
Now l e t W be another Euclidean vector space, and B : V * V * W a symmetric w
b i l i n e a r map.
Then for each w E W we have B defined by
w
B ( u , v ) = for a l l u,v ft V. For any symmetric polynomial function a: B
ra
(2.16) R we have o(B) £ 0*W defined
by w
o(B)(w) = c ( B ) ,
(2.17)
using the canonical i d e n t i f i c a t i o n s
(the use of which was suggested by 0.
Rawnsley) k
ow
= P (W*) - P (W) k
k
of elements of 0*W with polynomial functions of U.
In p a r t i c u l a r , that
i d e n t i f i c a t i o n assigns to v. © . . . 0 v. e 0 W that polynomial function on w k given by w *
w
o(B ) =
k
Alternative definition:
(2.18)
o(B) i s determined by the o ( B ) , 0 £ k < m, and k
these can be evaluated as follows: o ( B ) - Trace B k
k
( k )
e © W,
(2.19)
k k * where B ^ ^ ^: A V * i \ V -• e U i s characterized by means of B
( k )
(u
1
A . . . A u , v, A . . . A v ) - det B ( 0 » V j ) . k
k
1
(2.20)
The adjugate B_ : V * V -+ #~^W of B : V x V * W i s given by B(u,v)
s
u
v
( .i)(* '* )
f
o
m
r
a 1 1
u
'
v
€
v
-
(2.21)
F i n a l l y , composition with a function f
: 0*W - R
gives the real number f ( o ( B ) ) .
52
(2.22) There are many choices a v a i l a b l e , such as
378
?
f(a(B))
^||a(B)[| ,
(2.23)
2
the norm on 0*W induced from the given Euclidean structure of W; or w
f(o(B))
|a(B )|dw,
(2.21)
where S^W denotes the unit (n-l)-sphere of W; or f(o(B))
< (B),h
( k )
0
>
(2.25) (k)
in case a is a 2k-homogeneous polynomial, where h k k * zation of 0 h, the induced inner product of 0 W .
3.
2k e 0
W i s the symmetri-
CERTAIN VARIATIONAL INTEGRALS
In General Let II f H be a Riemannian vector bundle of fibre dimension m over a Riemannian manifold H and l e t o : F
m
< F be a symmetric function.
I f 5B(V) •+ M
denotes the bundle of s e l f - a d j o i n t endomorphisms of V and A denotes a section, then we have the density function o(A) : H - > F , and i t s integral J (A) 0
= | o(A)v .
(3.1)
g
Its Euler-Lagrange operator can be derived e a s i l y , using the basic formula [28, Lemma A] d
d A
°r V] C
t = n
-
T
r
a
c
f t [It
e
- X .(A)
3.2)
r
t=0
r
1
where (A^.) i s a 1-parameter variation of A = A- and X _ | ( A ) is the ( r - 1 )
th
r
Newton endomorphism. The
adjugate
J^A)
integral
Of
is
= J o(A)w .
(3.3)
g
I f W * H is another Riemannian vector bundle, we have the bundle SB(V,w) of symmetric b i l i n e a r maps V x V * W.
Given f:0 W - K and a symmetric poly-
nomial orF •* R , we can define the variational integral JJ
0 i f
(B)
= f f(o(B))v
g
(3.4)
53
379
of the sections
B of 5B{V,W).
I t s adjugate integral JJ (B)
is
j f(o(B))v .
a f
(3.5)
g
m
where B denotes the adjugate of B, a section of SB(V,© ~^W). See [ 1 7 ] for v a r i e t i e s of examples different from those considered below. F i r s t Order Integrals Example 1
For a map $:M * N between Riemannian manifolds we form the den-
s i t y o(**h) a
: M •* R and i t s integral I ( * ) as i n the Introduction. a
Taking
we have the energy integral of
7 J°1<* > g " 7 J h
v
Vg = £ ( • ) .
I t s Euler-Lagrange operator i s a,
(e(<{>))>
(3.5) known as the tension field
T(4>) of
i t i s a section of 41 TN. The adjugate of E i s
I j °m-1 ** (
h K ,
(
g
3
"
7
)
I t s Euler-Lagrange operator i s
Example 2
Taking a
C
°m1 *»*
h , u
g
=
, we obtain the volume integral
V {
of $;j
J
(
* '
3
9
'
)
I t s adjugate i s
9
(
m "-
1 ) / 2
(#*h)v
| g
We observe that i / m - 2, then both variational ( 3 . 9 ) are
seIf-adjugate.
Example 3
Take a
54
~ k/2 oj , k > 0 , SO
principles
( 3 . 6 ) and
3
-
,
0
)
380
(Kilbert-Schmidt norm as in (3.6))
not to be confused with I
.
In part-
°k i c u l a r , taking k - m and applying Newton's inequalities
( 2 . 5 ) , we obtain
V($) S i U ) o
with equality i f f (> i s weakly conformal.
That borderline case has been
widely studied; see [ 3 2 ] , for instance. Example 4 T
For 1 < p < m the Euler-Lagrange operator of l (*)
q
-2 Trace v(d$ •> ^ ( $ ) ) ;
(3.11)
see [38] for a study of that variational p r i n c i p l e . 1^ ($)
is
a conformal
Example 5
0
=
($) is
g
invariant
of
I f dim M = m = 2p, then
(H,g).
Let 1 < p < m and
[ a
p
]
" °p-1 V i
Then I (<{>) is a conformal
invariant
a
of (M,g).
I t s adjugate I^dfO has i n t e -
grand corresponding to the symmetric function -2 _ ~ -im/4p- (p-1)m/2p m-p °m-p 1 ° m - p - l °m
r [o
J
+
Second Order Integrals Example 6
Taking o
—'——
+k
k
o , , we find o . l e U ) ) 1 '
If f
is
the
gral
of
a map 4>:M -* N i s
power of
the
= T ( * ) , the tension f i e l d of 4.
norm (k e K{> 0 ) ) ,
the
total
k
tension
|-r(4)|| y
inte-
(3.12)
k
studied by Chen [11, 13] and Willmore [35] in case $ is an immersion. adjugate integral
is
I'm-iWMI Example 7
Its
V
I f 4i:M •* N is an immersion, i t s a-mean curvature
function in the brackets below.
i
i s the real
V
For instance, (-1 ) "o (S (*)) i s the |n
55
381
curvature o f M i n N i n t h e normal d i r e c t i o n s .
Lipschitz-Killing rs-mean
curvature
of
C
j j s , T "Si
$
The
total
is
V
o
(3.13)
g
k The
i n t e g r a l s with o =
k
1 and p • m; and by Chen [ 1 1 ] f o r a r b i t r a r y k , p .
Example 8
is well formal of
defined
recorded
2
using
invariant
(3.14)
The
have been s t u d i e d
p
by C h e r n - L a s h o f
[15] for
F o r any map $:M ->• N then
||%(e(*))||
ft
|[o ||
- <5 (BW) ,h>f
/Z
z
(2.25).
of ( N , h ) .
And if
(3.14)
Vg
$ is an immersion
See [ 1 4 ] and [ 2 5 ] .
h a s been computed
then
it
is a
The E u l e r - L a g r a n g e
con-
operator
( f o r i m m e r s i o n s ) by K a r c h e r - V o s s [ 2 1 ] , and
in [ 3 7 ] .
v a r i a t i o n a l t h e o r y o f t h i s example goes back to the e a r l y 1920s;
Thomsen [ 3 1 ] , and i n p a r t i c u l a r the r e f e r e n c e
t h e r e t o W. Schadow;
see
then
B l a s c h k e [ 7 ] , Chen [ 1 ? ] . Example 9
F o r immersions $ : M •* N
(with constant sectional derived
rather general
•Ip
of h y p e r - s u r f a c e s i n space
o.
For i n s t a n c e ,
if o
o
p
+ Do
p + 1
E^£$J - j a ( B U ) ) v
m + 1
the functions
o^fBdjO),
0 < 2k < m, a r e (up to S i m i l a r l y , JUt
Reilly
line.
Then
i s the H e s s i a n o f t h e
[ 2 7 , 29] has c a l c u l a t e d / t r a n s f o r m e d the
integrals
o f o _ ( & { $ ) ) t b a s e d on h i s formula Trace V x ( B U ) L = p a n
iFnr 56
6 C a
is
of Lovelock [ 2 2 ] ,
Take f o r ( N , h ) the r e a l R.
for
is
f a c t o r s ) t h e i n t r i n s i c c u r v a t u r e s of Weyl [ 3 4 ] .
function * : M
p
g
( B ( $ ) ) + ctm-p+Dop.^Bt*)).
the E i n s t e i n tensors
Example 10
forms
[ 2 6 , 2 8 ] have
then t h e Newton t e n s o r x
f r e e ; and the E u l e r - L a g r a n g e o p e r a t o r
immersion $ : M - ' R
constant are
'(c)
c u r v a t u r e c ) Rund [ 3 0 ] and R e i l l y
the Euler-Lagrange operators for i n t e g r a l s
divergence
For
m +
''-'V
a ;
V-VVrVVi*
Ab ba' p
382 He makes several good applications, using p - 1.
4.
MONGE-AMPERE OPERATORS
Functions Given a function $:M + K , we define i t s Monge-Ampere density (real form) as the function pttlVh,
(4-1)
where dot denotes the contraction of the adjugate of the Hessian of $ with i t s f i r s t fundamental form.
The associated Euler-Lagrange operator is the
determinant o (6(4>))-
(4.2)
m
Let us compare that variational p r i n c i p l e with i t s standard complex analogue on a KShler manifold M (of complex dimension m) [ 4 - 6 , 2 ] , be a complex function. c
(dd $)
m _ 1
Let <j>:M •* £
As integrand we have the 2m-form c
A d$ A d $ ,
where d = d" + d' and d
c
(4.3) i(d" - d ' ) .
I t s associated Euler-Lagrange operator
is m
(dd%) .
(4.4)
K. Grosse-Brauckmann [19] has derived (4.2) from a version of ( 4 . ! ) by taking real s l i c e s in the complex form.
T. Aubin [1] and I . J . Bakelman [3] M
have used a different Monge-Ampere integrand in case H = R , producing ( 4 . 2 ) , As an m-form t h e i r integrand i s cohomologous to that of ( 4 . 1 ) .
We prefer
(4.1) because of what comes next. Haps If * i)):H + N i s a map, then the contraction BU)'<(i*h i s a section of
fir"
TN.
Usingg ((2 2 . 2 2 ) , we can then define the density f{Bdt>)'if> h) for any function f : e©""^TN ^ T N •+ R .
The Monge-Ampere density
of *:H - N can reasonably be
defined as
57
383
2
Zll£(*)-**M| • Example I I
(4.5)
$:R ->• N i s a path, then $*h = | $ ' \
Z
and
t
= g^)
= D^'/dt;
so ?
6(o)-**h = Example 12
| D*7dt.
Suppose that <ji:M •* N i s an immersion, so that (i*h
the adjugate tension f i e l d of $. of construction whenever $:M any
g.
Then
More g e n e r a l l y , we can make the same sort
N i s a map with <|>*h non-degenerate,
forming
o(e(*}-i(>*h). The case m = 2 i s e s p e c i a l l y i n t e r e s t i n g .
of ^ .
Then fij$)*$ h i s a v a r i a t i o n
In l o c a l charts i t has the form (subscripts on $ denoting
different-
iation) Y
(e($)) '
e ^ < $ , $ > - 2 B | < * , 4 > + 6 | < * 2 j ) 2 > , (1 £ Y - n ) . 1
1
2
2
Ii
1
>(
I f $:M + K i s weakly conformal ( i . e . , $*h = ug for some function u:M->-E(> 0)), then i t s Monge-Ampere density becomes ^ | | T ( $ ) || tension density (Example 6) for isometries.
P , which i s the total
Suitable parameter normalization
2
of a map $:M
* N produces the form ( 4 . 2 ) of i t s Euler-Lagrange operator,
as described i n [17, Example 6 ] , References [1]
Aubin, T .
Equations de Monge-Ampere r e e l l e s . J. Fun. Analysis
41 (1981)
[2]
Aubin, T .
[3]
Bakelman, I . J . Variational problems and e l l i p t i c Monge-Ampere equat-
354-377. nonlinear
Analysis
on Manifolds.
Monge-Ampere
equations.
Springer (1982).
ions. [4]
J.
Diff.
Ampere equation. [5]
Inv.
Math.
Bedford, E . and Taylor, B. Ampere equation. 403.
58
Geo. 18 (1983)
Bedford, E . and Taylor, B,
I.
669-699.
The D i r i c h l e t problem for a complex Monge37 (1976) Variational
1-44. properties of the complex Monge-
Dirichlet principle.
Duke Math.
J.
45 (1978) 375¬
384 [6]
Bedford, E . and Taylor, 8. Ampere equation. I I .
Variational properties of the complex Monge-
I n t r i n s i c norms.
Amer. J. Math.
10 (1979) 1131¬
Igeometrie
Springer
1166. [7]
Blaschke, W.
Vorlesungen
Uber Differentia
III.
(1929). [8]
Bourbaki, N.
Algebre
multilineaire.
[9]
Bourbaki, N.
Formes
sesquiline-aires
Hermann (1948). et
formes
quadratiques.
Hermann
(1959). [10] Chen, B-Y. On a theorem of Fenchel-Borsuk-Wi1Imore-Chern-Lashof. Ann.
[11] Chen, B-Y. On the total curvature of immersed manifolds I — I I I • J.
Math.
Amer.
93 (1971) 148-162; 94 (1972) 799-809; 95 (5973) 636-642.
[12] Chen, B-Y. An invariant of conformal mappings. 40 (1973)
Proc.
Amer, Math.
Soc.
J. London
Math.
563-564.
[13] Chen, B-Y. On a variational problem on hypersurfaces. Soc.
Math.
194 (1971) 19-26.
6 (1973) 321-325.
[14] Chen, B-Y. Some conformal invariants of submanifolds and t h e i r a p p l i cations.
Bol. U.M.I.
10 (1974)
380-385.
[15] Chern, S-S. and Lashof, R.K. On the total curvature of immersed manifolds I , I I . Amer. J. Math.
?9 (1957) 306-318.
Mich.
Math.
J. £. (1958)
5-12. [16] E e l l s , J . and Sampson, J . H . Amer. J. Math. [17] E e l l s , J . Geo.
Math.
86 (1964)
Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds.
109-160.
Variational theory in f i b r e bundles: Examples. Phys.
Liege-Leuven.
Math.
Phys.
Studies
3.
Proc
Reidel
Diff.
(1983)
148-158. [18] Glaeser, G.
Fonctions composees d i f f e r e n t i a b l e s .
Ann. Math.
77 (1963)
193-209. [19]
Grosse-Brauckmann, K.
M.Sc.
Variational
properties
of Monge-Ampere
equations.
T h e s i s , Warwick (1984).
[20] Hardy, G . H . , Littlewood, J . E . and Polya, G.
Inequalities.
Cambridge
(1934). 2
[21] Karcher, H. and Voss, K. j H dA und KonformminimalflSchen.
Oberwolfach.
September (1972). [22] Lovelock, 0.
The E i n s t e i n tensor and i t s g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s .
J. Math.
Phys.
12 (1971) 498-501. 59
385
[23]
MacMahon, P . A . Chelsea
Combinatory
analysis
I,
U.
Cambridge ( 1 9 1 5 ,
1916),
(1960).
[24]
Malgrange,
B.
[25]
Reilly, R.C.
Ideals
of
Differentiable
Functions.
Tata
Inst.
Bombay
(1966).
the [26]
sphere.
[28]
J.
Reilly, R.C. Canad.
[27]
Extrinsic rigidity Diff.
Geo.
theorems
4 (1970)
Congress.
(1971)
o f mean c u r v a t u r e .
On the H e s s i a n o f a f u n c t i o n
graph.
Math.
Mich.
tures
J.
20
(1973)
Proc.
13
th
and t h e
c u r v a t u r e s of
its
373-383.
Variational properties
for hypersurfaces
of
102-114.
Reilly, R.C.
Reilly, R.C.
submanifolds
487-497.
Variational properties
Math.
f o r compact
of
functions
in space forms.
J.
of
Diff.
t h e mean c u r v a -
Geo.
8 (1973)
465¬
477. [29]
Reilly, R.C. manifold.
[30]
Rund, H.
Hamburg
3 (1924)
Uhlenbeck,
[33]
V o s s , K.
[34]
W e y l , H.
[35]
Willmore, T . J . London
[36]
[37]
Ann.
[38]
variational
problems
Minimal s p h e r e s
Math.
Soc.
5
Flachentheorie.
Studies
103
and o t h e r conformal
(1983)
F l S c h e n und H y p e r f l H c h e n . On t h e
on subspaces
Hamb. Math. E i n z e l s c h r i f t e n No.
Math.
volume o f t u b e s . T i g h t immersions
Soc.
3 (1971)
of
a
(1971). Ab.
Math.
Sem.
variational
pro-
169-176. Kongruenzsatze fdr
Math.
Ann.
Amer.
Math.
and t o t a l
3 (1956) J.
62
absolute
gesch-
180-218.
(1939)
461-472.
curvature.
Bull.
129-151.
Mean c u r v a t u r e o f
3 (1971)
Riemannian i m m e r s i o n s .
J.
London
307-310.
T o t a l c u r v a t u r e i n Riemannian g e o m e t r y .
E , Horwood
(1982).
Wood, C M .
Some energy-related
variational
theory.
James E e l l s Mathematics I n s t i t u t e U n i v e r s i t y o f Warwick C o v e n t r y CV4 7AL U.K.
60
of
i n a Riemannian
459-472.
Einige differentialgeometrische
Willmore, T . J . Series
the H e s s i a n o p e r a t o r
(1979)
31-56.
K.K.
Willmore, T . J . Math.
26
Grundlagen d e r konformen
[32]
lossene
J. theory
manifold.
Thomsen, G.
blems.
Math.
Invariant
Riemannian [31]
Applications of
Ind.
functionals,
and
their
T h e s i s , U n i v e r s i t y of Warwick
vertical
(1983).
386 Contemporary Mathematics Volume 58, Part III, 1987
Harmonic maps and minimal surface coboundaries. K.-C. Chang and J . Eells (Universities of Peking and Warwick) 1.
INTRODUCTION. We describe some recent results concerning minimal surfaces; and in particu-
l a r , announce a theorem on the presence of unstable minimal surfaces nian manifolds domain and
M in Rieman-
N (see 55 below). A special case, where- M i s a bordered planar n
N i s Euclidean n-space
Shiftman [23, 24]. I f
F , is due to Morse-Tompkins [18] and
M is a disc and
N
n
R , that special case has been recast
by Struwe [25]; we shall indicate how his argument can be adapted to prove our theorem. Several different developments in the past six years have made such an extension possible: 1)
Suitable existence, uniqueness, and regularity of solutions to the Dirichlet problem; and smooth dependence on i n i t i a l conditions. See 563,5 for references.
2J.
Various generalizations of the proof of existence of Douglas' versions of the Plateau problem.
And of the theorem of Morse-Tompkins and Shiffman.
See §4. 3)
A version of a deformation lemma in certain spaces of maps, in the presence of a compactness condition like that of Palais-Smale, sufficient to produce both the mountain-pass lemma and the Morse inequalities. See 55. We thank Professor Luc Lemaire for his comments on a preliminary version of
this manuscript. 2.
BACKGROUND. General references [7, 6 ] . Let
noted by sed curves
M be a compact bordered Riemann surface with conformal structure deu ; thus
M has a boundary consisting of a finite number of simple clo-
(B^Jl<"
'
_ e t
"
^
e
fl
biemannian manifold without boundary. © 1987 American Mathematical Society 0271-4132/87 31.00 + $.25 per page 11
387
'2
K.-C. CHANG and J. EELLS If
C(M,N)
denotes the space of smooth maps
p:C(M,N) * e(SH.lt)
of p
the r e s t r i c t i o n map
consists of the union of those components of
extendible
to
M.
$ : M * N and
( i . e . , p(«)
3H
C(3M,N)
which contains a map
Thus p:C(M,N) * E(3M,N)
i s a locally t r i v i a l fibration carrying components of E(3M,N). id
to maps
The fibre
C^(M,N) over a map
C(M,N) onto components of
e £(aM,N) i s the space of extensions of
M * N.
The ie.ni.icn i i e W
T ( * ) of a map 4>:M -> N is the section of
div(d<j>) ; in local charts (isothermal on
*>~*TN given by
M, arbitrary on N) that has the represen-
tation Y
$ _ zz
+
0 aB
(1 » Y * n
dim N)
z Z
where subscripts on
& denote complex derivatives and
Civita connexion on
N.
(r*„)
describes the Levi-
The tension field defines a map T:C(M,N)
and
*
C(H,TN)
;
_ 1
T ( 0 ) = H(M,N) , the space of haJimorUc map* $;H •* N ; thus _ 1
T { 0 ) nC^(M,N) With induced topology, T
fi(M,N)
(4> 6 H(M,N) : 4 |
3 M
is locally compact and locally f i n i t e dimensional.
i s the Euler-Lagrange operator of the e n e r g y innoXipnal iM
The harmonic map
*
|
i s said to be
|]d*|
?
.
rtondegen&'ULte.
i f the Hessian
V E($) i s a
nondegenerate quadratic form¬ The «(*)
conionmatuty 2
(**h) '
0
opehaXoi
, where
? * - C(0 T H)
is given by
4>*h i s that symmetric 2-covariant tensor field on H
obtained by pulling back via (2,0)
K:C(M,N)
41 the Riemann metric
indicates that we take the
h of
N, and the superscript
dz -component of i t s complexification.
In an
isothermal chart, 2
(4*h) '°
J(I* I X
Z
l* | v
Z
-mk^fXiS.
Consequently, a map M * N i s (weakly) conformal i f f And $:M -* N
0. qti.adha.ti-e.
tii-l
ije/ieittxa£
388
13
HARMONIC MAPS AND MINIMAL SURFACE COBOUNDARIES
on
M.
M In
Also,
T
(0)n
<" (0)
ii
the. ipace.
ol minimal
blanched
immeMioni
oj
N. If
(*Q.HQ)
M and a l l maps
i s a c r i t i c a l point of
$
E for a l l conformal structures
in a given relative homotopy c l a s s , then
*g
u on
i s a minimal
branched immersion. 3.
DIRICHLET'S PROBLEM. Assume henceforth that
ty conduction:
N is complete and s a t i s f i e s the following
There are constants
domain of a coordinate chart (3.1)
c >0
c|de(y)¥)|
for any
y
e
V and
Ve
T
N
y
n
G;V * R
T
( )-
2
such that any point of
N is in the
whose image i s the unit d i s c , and <
n
a/U^oiml-
< C|de(y)Y|
Z
n
nat condition i s satisfied in
N i s compact.
With i t we have Morrey's solution [16, 17] to the Dirichlet problem: (3.2)
ihz
Foi any
zneAU
e E(3M,N)
thoA
a ha/manic
map
$ e C^(M,N) uhioh
mirUmlzzt,
E on C^(M,N).
Morrey states his result for planar domains
M , but his proof carries over to the
present situation. We cannot always prescribe the component of
C^M.N) , as shown by a simple
example of Lemaire [14] i l l u s t r a t i n g the necessity of some hypothesis in his theorem [14, 15]: Ton. any nent oi
i> e E(3M,N)
C^M.N)
(3.3)
,
tkent
provided
-ii an
n^N)
E-minAmizinQ hawionie
map in
zveAy compo-
= 0 .
Concerning uniqueness, there is a maximum principle of jMger-Kaul [10], gi-
ving the following theorem: Sappaie. and tatttiM the. actional | I . 6 ) ii
U>(3M)
r
ii
contained
and eontaim cuAvatutie. oj
in an open diic.
no geodeiic N
eveAywheAe
bianQle..
D(b,r) C N t&Ltk cenfiz
I j r < TT/2I4J
aiitk
<_ B , then the. iotation
B > 0
i n . 11.51
b and and
unique.
The formulation involving no geometric biangles was made in For example, i f
[11].
N is a complete manifold with nonpositive sectional curva-
ture, then in every component of
C^(M,N)
there i s a unique harmonic map, which i s
an E-minimum in that component [9,20]. 4. PLATEAU'S PROBLEM. Now suppose that
M is a compact oriented bordered surface (no conformal
structure i s supposed given) of genus M
p and with
k boundary curves
389
14
(
K.-C. CHANG and J. EELLS
Vl
S
•
a
y
t
h
a
t
M
h
a
s
t l J p e
( p
-
'> •
t.
On i t s double
H the possible
Jordan curves are the following
[15]:
1) Those contained and essential
in
eAowtiaZ
Int
2) those intersecting two different
M or
( i . e . , not homotopically t r i v i a l )
in M-M ;
B\ ;
3) those homotopic to a multiple or some
b\ ;
4) those containing an arc with endpoints on
B^
, not contractible through such
arcs. Let H
C
C
b
( i'i<j
e
a
s
e
t
a
f
disjoint oriented Jordan curves in
a relative homotopy class of continuous
monotonieally onto
C.
( i . e . , with
ving orientation (1 <_ i <_ k ) .
$
N ; and
-maps f; 11 t N carrying each
(y) connected for each
Call such maps
B.
y e C-) , preser-
admiiiibtt.
Relative to these we define (as in |13| a pUma/uj reduction
M' of
M to
be a surface (possibly disconnected) obtained from either of the following operations: a) Take an essential Jordan curve in N .
Cut H along
B of
Int M whose
H-images are contractible
B , and collapse to a point each of the resulting cut
curves; or b) take an arc an arc of
B
to arcs in n
n
on
M joining two points of some
through arcs with endpoints on
;
C. . Cut
M along
B
which i s not homotopic to
i
, whose H-images are homotopic
fj ; the two parts of
B. , and the two copies of
form two new boundary curves. Collapse one of them to a point. We require an
of surfaces
i>me.daCA.bitUy condition
((4.1) below), restricing the types
M which w i l l map to coboundaries of
C in
N. Such a condition was 11
f i r s t formulated and thoroughly studied by Douglas | 3 , 4] in case N Morrey [16, 17] in general. Define
E(C,p,H)
The present form is due essentially to Jost [13].
inf(lim inf E(* , u „ ) ) for a l l sequences of confound AS
structures
u
$
on
IR ; and by
M and continuous
ii
-maps
same homomorphism on the fundamental group as admissibly onto curves
[ E , , , •
<
$ : ( M , u ) * (N,h) inducing the s
s
H , and mapping
(B^)
in which converge to C%)i
k
1 ( i
k
< k
in the
Frechet sense: inf a
max(d(<j> (x) , a ( x ) ) ; j t t ^ j * s
for monotone orientation preserving maps F i n a l l y , set ry reductions of
E*(C,p,H) = •
M ; or
if
p
0
as
s.*<»
,
ct:B. ~ C. (1 <_ i <_ k) . 0 and k
1 ; or i f there are no prima-
390 HARMONIC MAPS AND MINIMAL SURFACE C O B O U N D A R 1 E S
15
E*{C,p,*0 - inf E(C,p',o) over a l l surfaces
M' which are homeomorphic to primary reductions of
The following result i s due to Morrey
[16]
for
M.
M a planar domain, with
modifications by Jost [13] to the present form: Let
M be
a complete
tt compact onientzd
D
C • C2|)v « t <
<
a
^
&ami££<J o£ diijoint
homotopy tfSi-i o& admiiiible. (4.1)
I j E(C,p,H)
and an admii&ible.
0
TI (N) Z
REMARK.
,
< E (C.p.H)
gitoapi a l
4> e
then
the
(p,k)
usiifaonmity condition.
; and N be Let
Jondan csUvjei in N ; and H a
aelative
map* M->-N . , then theAe. i i a con^onmal AttuctuAi.v
cxinftjlmat kutmnic
pki&m ofj iimdmental TJ5
bon.deA.ed 4utjace o& type
RiemanniAn mani&old iati&fiying
Ii.
map $:(M,y) * (N,h) Fu/Lfhe'iMWrt.e,
$
on M
inducing the. iame homomon.-
can be. cfioicn to minimize
ahza.
H .
Another sort of irreducibi 1 i ty i s the incompressibility hypothesis that
the homomorphisms *.(H)
: TT. (M)
- *,(N)
be injective. In that form the theorem was obtained by Lemaire [15], using ideas of Sacks-Uhlenbeck [19]
and Schoen-Yau [ Z l ] .
5. EXISTENCE OF UNSTABLE MINIMAL SURFACES. We are now in a position to state the main result in [2]: Let
M be a compact oriented surface of type
(p,) , and (N,h) a complete
Riemannian manifold satisfying the uniformity condition (3.1). Let C -
(C ) i
1 < i < k
be a set of disjoint oriented Jordan curves in
N satisfying the irreducibiTiTy
condition (4.1). Finally, we shall require the
coeitivity
(5.1)
condition-'
Assume that the Dirichlet problem has a nondegenerate solution in any rela-
tive homotopy class; and i f
: M -» N are relatively homotopic harmonic maps,
then (relative to an isometric embedding of
N into a Euclidean space
V, for
convenience) we require
llMll
< constant j j ($-I|I) I
That condition i s satisfied i f maximum principle of [10].
11
3M
C>,V) (N,h)
C°(3M,V)
has nonpositive sectional curvature, by the
391
K.-C. CHANG and J. EELLS
16
Theorem . I j conformal admiA&lblz not an
$ :(M,Ug) * ( N , h ) and *^:(M,Uj) - (N,h)
axe. homotopic
0
iAolatzd
E-minima, thzn theAe. i j a conjCimae (.tnuetuAz
con^o/wal
v
on
admU&ibte. M and an
harmonic, map $:(H,IJ) * ( N , h ) homotopic to both, which
ii
E-minimum. The proof w i l l be given in [2].
i s the unit disc Step 1. As in
Here are the main ideas, f i r s t in case M
D (adapted from [25]).
52, the fibration
unique solution of
p
has a section
R over its image, given by the
D i r i c h l e t ' s problem (3.2), Furthermore, the nondegeneracy of
V E in the coercivity condition insures (see [8, 14]) that
R is continuous, and
smooth with respect to manifold structure on suitable spaces of maps: C(D,N) R
+ p Image
Step 2.
Fix an extendible diffeomorphism
C° H L j
/ 2
p CC(9D,N)
.
a:3D - C j . Consider the Banach space
{[0.2™]. K) with norm
"1/2
and l e t H
ft
Then
e C° n
LJ ([0,2TI],F) / z
:
ij. i s monotone, and
Define the function
, k=0,l,2,3,J .
J : M * F by Jft)
i 1
If
^(-^p)
M i s complete and convex.
i s a c r i t i c a l point of
harmonic.
Furthermore,
Sraale with respect to
J
J
J
f IdRtao^l D
with respect to
2
.
M , then
R(O.OI(F)
is conformal and
s a t i s f i e s (in a suitable sense) the condition of Palais-
M. That requires the Courant-Lebesgue lemma; and for general
N the maximum principle of [10], as in (3.3). A standard conclusion i s the mountain-pass property (as well as Morse theory for functions with isolated c r i t i c a l points f l ] ) , which here insures that i f
e M are two isolated J-minima, then there is a third c r i t i c a l point which is
not a J-minimu.
392 HARMONIC MAPS AND MINIMAL SURFACE COBOUNDARIES
Step 3.
For arbitrary
type (p,k) . Then
fi
M let
R(p,k)
17
be the Riemann moduli space of surfaces of
is defined on R(p,k) » Image P . We proceed as in Steps 1 and
2. To verify the Palais-Smale condition we need now Mumford's compactness theorem, which in the present context (as in
[21,§3})
says that i f Cl4.*$J i'S a sequence on
which E is bounded, then (p.) subconverges to some u e R(p,k). BIBLIOGRAPHY [ l j K.-C. Chang, A variant mountain pass lemma. Scientia Sinica 26; no. 12(1583), 1241-1255. Also the lecture notes, Infinite dimensional Morse theory and i t s applications. 22nd. Sem. Math. Sup. Montreal (1983). [ 2 ] K.-C. Chang and J . E e l l s , Unstable minimal surface coboundaries. (In preparation. ) [ 3 ] J . Douglas, Some new results in the problem of Plateau. J . Math. Phys. 15(1936), 55-64. [4]
, Minimal surfaces of higher topological structure. Ann. Math. 40 ~C193"9), 205-298.
[ 5 ] R. Courant, The existence of minimal surfaces of given topoloaical type. Acta Math. 72(1940), 51-98. [_6]
, Dirichlet's principle, conformal mappings, and minimal surfaces. Tnferscience (1950).
[ 7 ] J . Eells and L . Lemaire, A report on harmonic maps. Bull. London Math. Soc. 10(1978), 1-68. [8]
, Deformations of metrics and associated harmonic maps. Patodi Mem. Vol. Geometry and Anatysis. Tata Inst. (1981),33-45.
[ 9 ] R. Hamilton, Harmonic maps of manifolds with boundary. Springer Notes 471 (1975). [10] W. Jager and H. Kaul, Uniqueness and s t a b i l i t y of harmonic maps and their Jacobi fields, manu. math. 28(1979), 269-291. [ l l ] J . Jost, Eine geometrische Bemerkung zur Satzen uber harmonische Abbildungen. manu. math. 32(1980), 51-57. [12]
, Harmonic mappings between Riemannian manifolds. Canberra (1984).
[13]
, Conformal mappings and the Plateau-Douglas problem.
r
14] L . Lemaire, Applications harmoniques de surfaces riemanniennes. 0. Diff. Geo. 13(1978), 51-78.
[15]
, Boundary value problems for harmonic and minimal maps of surfaces into manifolds. Ann. Scuola Nor. Sup, Pisa 9 (1982), 91-103.
[16] C.B. Morrey, The problem of Plateau on a Riemannian manifold, Ann. Math. 49 (1948), 807-851. [17]
. Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations. Grundlehren Band 170 (1960). Springer.
393
18
K.-C. CHANG and J . EELLS
[18] M. Morse, and C.B. Tompkins, The existence of minimal surfaces of general c r i t i c a l types. Ann. Math. 40 (1939), 443-472. [19] J . Sacks and K. Uhlenbeck, Minimal immersion of closed Riemann surfaces. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 271 (1982), 639-652. [2d] R. Schoen, Existence and regularity for some geometric variational problems. Thesis, Stanford Univ. (1977). [2l] R. Schoen and S . - T . Yau, Existence of incrompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three dimensional manifolds with non-negative scalar curvature. Ann.Math. 110 (1979), 127-142. [ZZ] M. Shiftman, The Plateau problem for minimal surfaces of arbitrary topological structure. Amer.J. Math. 61(1939),853-882. [23l
, The Plateau problem for non-relative minima. Ann.Math. 40(1939), 834-854.
[24]
, Unstable minimal surfaces with several boundaries. Ann. Math. 43 ~fT94"2TT"197-ZZ2.
[25] M. Struwe, On a c r i t i c a l point theory for minimal surfaces spanning a wire in IR . J . reine ang. Math. 349 (1984), 1-23. n
394
Acta MaLhematicfl Sirica, New Series 1986, Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 233—247
Unstable Minimal Surface Chang Kungching ( Peking
Coboundaries
4§JU
University
James Eells ( f Warwick
)
University
Received June 24, 1985
§1. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to present a proof of the theorem below, announced in [3]. The relevant technical concepts are discussed
in §2.
Let M be a compact oriented surface of type {p.k), and (N,h) a complete Riemannian manifold. If ft is a conformal structure on M compatible with its orientation, then we write (M, u) for the associated
Riemann surface.
The energy of a map 4>. (M,u)-f(jV, h) from the Riemann surface to the Riemannian manifold is
Its smooth
extrema are called harmonic maps.
Let I" = {1",)^
be a set of disjoint oriented Jordan curves in N.
1)
(N,h)
2)
F satisfies
3)
together they satisfy
Theorem.
satisfies
the uniformity condition
the irreducibility condition
the coercivity condition
If tf> : (M,p )-»(N,h) and 0
a
(2.6); (2.10); (2.11).
[M,u )-'[N,k} i
are homotopic admissible con-
formal isolated E-minima, then there is a conformal structure ft on M and an admissible
conformal harmonic map
395 234
Chang Kungching Jainca EeTb
compactness condition of Palais Smale. That insures the validity of the mountain pass Proposition (3.12). And of a form of Morse's inequalities (3.13,3.14) if all critical points are isolated. We give a proof of the Theorem in Section 4, in case Af is a disc; the proof in the general case ia given in Section 5. In the literature the term "unstable" has been applied to harmonic maps in several (liferent contexts; and consequently is susceptible to misunderstandings of various sorts. Our title refers to
komological instability: / / [ ( { J ? ^ b}, {E< c}) ^ 0, in the notation of (3.13) below. If our problem ia nondegenerate (a context which is likely to be generic), then we can define the instability of a conformal harmonic map by requiring that its Morse index be positive. §2. Technical Aspects of Minimal Surfaces (2.1)
A compact oriented surface M has type Ip, k) if it has genus p and its boundary consists of
k circles ( ^ i ^ , - ^ - A informal equivalence class of Riemannian metrics on M is equivalent to a complex structure on Af. Those complex structures are parametrized by the Riemann moduli space 3Hp, k), a quotient of Teichmiiller space ?(p, k), which is a complex cell. (A convenient reference is [130
(2.2)
For tbe proofs
harmonicity:
below it is convenient
to use global equations to
express
Suppose that t]:N-* P i s an isometric embedding of (N, h) into a Euclidean space V
of finite dimension. (Or, in a more elementary manner, one can construct a Riemann metric on a space V in which N is embedded isometrically and totally geodesically in a Riemannian disc bundle U which is an open set of V; see [8, §7].) For any map 4): M-* N let 4" = i)°(b: Af-* V; then the harmonic map equations take the form «P„- + Kt («) * ;
(2.3)
(1 < c < dim V).
- 0
Here subscripts on $ denote complex partial derivatives in terms of isothermal charts on (Af, (i); and (J£ ) represents the second fundamental form of the projection map of the disc bundle Tt: U 6
(2.4)
:
1 -
With any map <J> (M>Z ) *(W>W
w
e
c a n
associate the quadratic differential
with Af, in terms of an isothermal chart. If if is harmonic, then 17^ is complex analytic: 5;n(o> , p ) = 2 n ( D 4 > „ 4 . ) ^ 0 . I 1
I
F
I
Also, (|> is (weakly) conformal if and only if A(<Ji-, <j>.) = 0; 4A [ f e
= k (4>„ 40
-ft(,) -
2ih (
In terms of polar coordinates, (2.5)
n, -
jT*0*ft$fefc, -
2
W;*»4i) - 2 > (
n
P
B
396
Unelablv Minimal Surface Coboundarics
233
The term in brackets is complex analytic, and is 0 at z — 0. (2.6)
We shall assume that (A', k) satisfies
the following
uniformity condition:
There are constants c > 0 and C > 0 such that any point of N is in the domain of a coordinate chart 6: U -»R"
whose image is the unit disc, and
^\Y\l^C\d6{y)Y It' for any y e t / and
YeT [N). That condition is satisfied if N is compact. y
With that condition, we have Money's solution [12,13; 6, §12] to the Dirichlet problem; the final statement
is due to Lemaire [ 1 1 ] ;
Given any map \ji
(2.7) =
F.tf
:M--N, there is an E-minimizing map §;M-*N
with §\
. Furthermore, <{> can be chosen to be relatively homotopic to i/t, provided !t (7V) =
(2.8)
2
Let T = |T,)J
<
;
<
j be a set of disjoint oriented Jordan curves in TV; and M a relative
homotopy class of continuous Lf-maps
admissible. (2.9)
We require an irreducibility condition on T, of a type studied by Douglas [ 4 , 5 ] in case N
= R"; and by Morrey [ 1 2 , 1 3 ] in general. The present form is due essentially to Jost [10]. First of all, we define a primary reduction Af of the surface Af be a surface obtained from either of the following operations: a)
Take an essential Jordan curve fS of Interior Af whose Si- images are contractible in N. Cut
Af along p\ and collapse to a point each of the resulting cut curves; or b)
take an arc n on Af joining two points of some B, which is not homotopic to an arc of B,
through arcs with endpoints on fi„ whose M-images are homotopic to arcs in I",. Cut Af along n; the two parts of
and the two copies of ij form two new boundary curves. Collapse one of them to a
point. Now
define
E{r,p,M) = inf (lim E(i?, ,)) tU
for all sequences of conformal structures p, on M and continuous Lj-maps
O"^^,^
i n
N
w
m
c
n
converge to (T^^jfccj
inf max (dM*), tt(x)}. * e B , ) - » 0 a
as s —• co for monotone orientation-preserving maps « : B , - * r j (1 ^ i < k).
i n
l h e
Fre
c h e t sense:
397 236
Chang Kungching James EeUa Set
E*(T,p, X) = oo if p = 0 and k = 1; or if there are no primary reductions of Af. Otherwise, set £*(r,p,.W) = i n f £ ( r , / , a ) over all surfaces Af which are homeomorphic to primary reductions in Af. The Lrreducibilily condition is (2.10)
EtT,p,M) < E*{r,p,2t); and * and two ri-minma can be joined by a path (y,) such that 1
1
E(y,)<E*(T, ,M}. P
(2.11) Finally, the coercivily condition: Assume that the Dirichlet problem has a nondegenerate solution in any relative homotopy class (see (2.7)). If ^>,iji:M-*N are relatively homotopic harmonic maps, then we require < constant the norms being the uniform norms on the designated Banach spaces. That condition insures the uniqueness of solutions to the Dirichlet problem in a given homotopy class. The coercivity condition is satisfied if (TV,ft)has nonpositive sectional curvature; or if both maps have images in a sufficiently small disc of [N, ft) [9]. §3. Critical Point Theory on Closed Convex Sets Let Xbe a Banach space with norm || ||, with dual space X'; the duality is denoted by (_x*,x~) for i€Xand x'eX*. Let M be a closed convex set in X. For each xeM we define its tangent cone Td\M) = c\{veX\x + eveM
for some E > 0 } .
It is easily seen that TJ^M) is a closed convex cone. For a continuous real function f : M -* R its directional derivative at xeM in the direction v€ TJ[M) is defined by d/M=
">» r'lf(x I -
+
+o
tv)-f{x)l
if that limit exists. / is said to be differentiable at x eM with respect of M if there is an x'eX* such that 0
<.X*,v> = dj{x v} 0l
for all
veTjM). l
It is denoted henceforth by f'{x ). If x -*.f'(x) is continuous on M, we write fe C {M, R). For any x*eX* and x eM, we let 0
0
(3.1) D «*D „ = Sup {(,**, v}\x +• veMand\\v\\ >Z 1}. Say that x eM is a critical point of f with respect to M if D —f(x ) U = 0. Let k denote the critical set of f w. r. t. M. The following two results are easy consequences of the definitions. 0
0
a
0
I(j
(•) This condition was missing from an earlier manuscript, as kindly observed by
J.JOBI
and M. Slruwe.
398 Unstable Minimal Surface Coboundaries (3.2) all
Proposition. veT {M).
x eM 0
£37
is a critical point off w. r. t. M if and only
if<j"{x ),v)>Qfor 0
lQ
(3.3) Proposition. If / e C ' ( J t , R ) , then x-*U —/'(x)0 , is continuous on M. Indeed, D — /'{x)D , = sup{< — f'(x),y — *> \yeM and ||y — x\\ ^ 1}; and that right member is clearly continuous in x. (3.4) Definition. A function/eC'(Jt, R ) is said to satisfy the condition of Palais-Smale w. i . t. M (written PS (M) henceforth) if for each sequence {x„} c M such that (3.5)
{/{*»))
(3.6)
D -f(x,)U
i s
x
bounded and ^ 0
as
n^ec,
there is a convergent subsequence. A basic property of such functions is as follows: l
(3.7) Proposition. Suppose that fe C (M, R ) satisfies PS(M} and [a, 6] R is an interval for which f [a,i>]f]K = Ol TAen fAere are e > 0 and 6>0 such that 1
U -f(x)a ^E
for
R
all
l
xef- \a-5,b
+ b~\.
i
Furthermore, for all c s R , the set K —f {c}f)K is compact. And iffis bounded below, then it has an absolute minimum in M. We are now in a position to establish critical point theory w. r. t. closed convex sets by the deformation lemmata as in the case of smooth manifolds. We outline the main ideas. c
Pseudo-gradient Vector Fields: By definition, for any x„eM i)
x + 0
\K
we can choose v eT {M} 0
satisfying
If)
v eM; o
1
") I M K : n
-fH w
iii) < - / 1 * o K > > ^
According to Proposition 3.3, there is 5 = S{x )>0 such that for all xeB{x ,S)f]M c
0
4 satisifes |\v (x)\ | < - ; and (-f'(x),v {x))>-U
the vector
2
(3.8)
v {x) = v + x -x
(3.9)
Then we find a locally finite partition of unity {f},} consisting of locally Lipschitz
o
o
0
0
0
- f\x)tt
x
.
functions on M; thus p^aJ^O for all xe;
and jifa) > 0
for only finitely many indices; SfJ,(jc) = 1 for each
xeM;
without loss of generality we can also suppose that for each the support of ft lies in a disc Bfx S ). lt
Define
W(x) =
Eft^M*),
t
399 Chang Kungfhing James Eells where WJ(JC) is defined as in (3,8) w. r. t. the point x,- We see that x + W[x}eM. Setting (3.10)
-A*)°**b).
we obtain the
following properties:
\\V{x)\\^
2D
-f'{x}O ; x
<-fUH*)>>n
-mwi
Deformations: The (3.11)
next result follows Proposition. If
from [21, Lemma 3.8].
V is locally Lipschitz, then the local flow
x=n*) = *0e M
xp) is in M. (3.12) thai
If
V is bounded on M,
Lemma. K
c
then the folw
is defined for
all time.
_
Suppose that / e C* °(Jt, R ) satisfies P5(Jt); that f~ ' { c , 6 ] n K = (/; and
is a finite
set.
Then {/"< c) is a strong deformation retract of {f^, b).
For the proof we consider the flow
The properties of pseudo-gradient fields and Proposition (3.11) permit us to follow the proof given in Chang [2]. Mountain Passes (3.13)
Proposition.
Suppose fe&'^M^R)
satisfies PS(M). Letx eM 0
minimum of f; and assume that there is a point x eM\{x } l
least one critical point
x w. r. I. M
with f(x ) = f[x ).
0
other than
bean isolated local
t
0
Then f has at
x. 0
In particular, if f has two isolated local minima, then it has another critical point w. r. t. M, which is not an absolute minimum. With the hypotheses
and notation
of (3.13) we can define
c - inf sup Mjtfjfjj : 0 ^ K 1 } > lak
f(x ), 0
where A = {AeC°([0,1],-M) with A(0) = x ,/\{l) = * , } . Then we can choose xeM so that/(£) = c. 0
Corollary.
Assume that c is the only critical value in the open interval (u, b). Then the
relative homology group
Bi(0£ b], {/<
c}) # 0.
In speaking of x as an unstable critical point of f,
we shall mean that property.
400
Unstable Minimal Surface Coboundaries
239
Proof. By definition, there is a path in { / < b] joining x to x , whereas there is none such in 0
{f
Therefore
in
the
homology
i
sequence •-•
b], {/"< c } ) - » / r ( { / 0
< c}) -> H {{f ^ b\) -* • • • the homomorphiBm ( is not injective. The desired conclusion now follows B
from
exactness. Remark.
Further precision on the relative homology at x can be given, as in [23].
Remark.
We may wish to consider the restriction f\jHr\Y' where Y is a Banach space
continuously injected into X. That function will not generally satisfy PS(M f] Y); however, Chang [2] has given conditions to insure that a form of the mountain pass proposition is still valid. Morse Relations for Functions with Isolated Critical Points (3.14)
I
L e t / e C ~ ° ( J t , R ) satisfy PS(M); and suppose that/has only finitely many critical points 1
{x } w. r. t. M inf~ [a, 6], with critical values {c } satisfying a < c, < b. Relative to any coefficient t
t
field for homology, set
Set Rj/;ta,b}) (3.15) Proposition.
= rank Hdjj H b},{f < a}).
(1) If Mif-^a, 6]) < to, then Mjifila, fr]) > RAfla, 6]). (2) If M,(/;[a, 6]) < co for all q> 0,
then for
any k > 0
,-0
,=o and £ ( - 1 ) < Mtf-la, T
T
1)* Wfa
*JV
JltoCTepHKK m,HHpejriiMaH Category Theory holds. That requires (3.16) Lemma. 1
=f~ [c)f\K
l
Let feC (M,R)
satisfy PS (M). For any c e R and neighbourhood U of K
there is an isolopy ij:[0,1] x M-*M
and i~>B>0
t
such that
= id.
0 <)M ii} i)(0,-) = id.;
iii) , ( l , | / < + i } \ K ) c [ f < - t ) . (
C
For applications there is an important addendum: If Mis symmetric and f is even, then i) eon be chosen to be odd.
401
Chang Kungching Jamts Edls
240
§4. The Caw in Which M is a Disc Let X = C° D
([0,2jt],R) denote the Banach space of real functions on [0, .' - | which are
both continuous and of Sobolev class L \
n
I lc° + l where the semi-norm | |
l ; J
. As norm we use the sum l
m
.
is that of the bilinear form
here the conjugate u of ueX
is given by
if u has the Fourier representation
u = Re £
aj~.
Let Jt = { u € ^ | u is weakly monotone, and u^^j
= ^^-{ T 0
4 = 0,
1, 2, 3}.
TAen J( is a closed convex set; and is also closed in the (f-topology [21, §3]. Now suppose we are given an oriented Jordan curve I embedded in N, represented (i. e., parametrized) by a diffeomorphism a:[0,2n] - » F c: N with a{0) = «(2jt). Set
i-r)- > er r
If D is the closed unit disc -{z denote by
for 4 - 1 ,
2, 3.
= re'*eC \z\ < 1} with boundary dD, then for any U 6 M we
(D,/V) the space of C°-extensions D-> N of the map a°u:c'D-» J~ which are C™ on
the interior of D. Our coercivity hypothesis (2.11) insures that
For any ueM and component of -*N
(D, N) there is one and only one harmonic map ip:/J
whose restriction tp| = tt°u. JD
Take a component M of CrfD./V), the space of smooth maps D — N carrying dD->T. The assignment
a i-»
R •*
„ : -M H* Cr.
According to the dependence theorem of [7, §4], with the coercivity condition (so v^Evfrj)) is nondegenerate), R is continuous; and in the smooth manifold structure of the C*-completion of Cr(D, N) for any finite k, R is as differentiable as a. Our next step is to study the function f: M-> R (the counterpart of the energy function E-.C^D.^R),
given by
402 Unstable Minima] Surface Coboundaries
241
f{u) =
\^\dRiufdxd
%
where the vertical bars refer to the Riemannian structure A on N. Note that / is differentiable w. r. t.
M.
Integration
by
parts
gives
[21,
Lemma
3.3(i)]
for any ve TJMp. Lemma.
If u is a critical point of f with respect lo M, then § = R{u) is conformal.
For
proof,
the
see
Appendix.
The function f satisfies the condition PS(M).
Lemma. Proof.
Let
{u }
be
m
a
sequence
in
M
such
f[u ) <
(4.3)
6
m
(4.4)
D -J'{a )D n
- n
that
- . 0 as m-»oo.
By the Courant-Lebesgue lemma (as in [21, Lemma 3.2]) there is a subsequence j u } (without m
change
of
subscripts)
(4.5)
for
u
which
—' u*,
m
weak
convergence
in
L j ( [ 0 , 2JI], R ) ; ) 2
and (4.6)
in
C°([0,2JI],R).
T h e weak limit u* is in M, because M is closed in the C°-topology. Our objective is to show that
u ^u* m
ing
L
1 / 2
([0,2n],R).
For any two harmonic maps <J>,
ljl:D-*N, we write 0
n:N-*V
then
as
in
(2.2);
and
= [<»(«) - KbW)lvM+ Apply
f
in
Green's 1
fust
\dt<S>->¥)\ dxdy=
Jn
f J
where
(,)
is
the
+ C ,]
express
jjfflrtW-
S
<
>dB™
|
structure
f
*-¥)>«/*«>,
Jo
< l
on
V\
we
obtain
the
estimate
t
' ~ ' ' * >afg| g
| £ 1 * - VI So + C 1
to
identity
Riemannian
2
(2.3)
7tM
f l f l
j" 4*-"T*)|Qfcdyi£
use
x
= (j"lp, P = r/°i/' relative to an embedd-
L 2
(|
L l
+ \d& \ ) | * - ¥ leo, L2
403
242
Chang Kungching James Eelia
where C, and C
are constants depending only on a fixed compact set in the manifold N.
2
Now take
R{u ), d>« = R(u*) and set < X> =
=
= »j-
m
m
n=
have
\*m ~ Applying
the
~ dR(u*)\ dxdy = j" \J(4> - Q'tfdxdy. 2
\U ~ jjWM
coercivity
m
condition
(2.11)
to
the
above
[21,
(3.8)]
we
we
obtain
1
dO +
3n From
estimate,
C b \u -a'\l„. i
m
have
da where M " - . " * ) l l > < C( |j« || 2 + B
t
|K*|f^Nb) -
<** l c ° -
Hov I
/ -
s
r
, * « - « * \ < W - » 0
fry
(4,5),
and
Using
(4.2),
H<26
«J 26 Q - / ' ( u j Q . „ -» 0
We
conclude
that
u
m
—* u*
in
L\ , . 2
That
completes
the
and
u
m
as m
proof
+ weJt}
no.
of
the
lemma.
We are now in a position to prove the theorem of §1 in case A / = D. T h e question of conformal structure does not arise here, for there is just one such on D. Let 4>,
conformal harmonic maps which are isolated minima for E, and belonging to the same component 3i f- CyiD. ;V). They are associated to isolated / - m i n i m a u , u , € J ( . Since J-.M—H 0
satisfies
PS(M}, wr can apply the mountain pass Proposition (3.13) to conclude that there is a third critical point u of J, and therefore there is at least one more admissible conformal harmonic map 4>
= R{u):D->N in Si. Remark.
In the present context the existence of at least one admissible conforms! harmonic
map can be proved directly from the validity of PS(M) starting with a / - m i m i m i z i n g sequence in 7
M.
404
Unstable Minimal Surface Caboundaries
§5.
243
The General Case We now indicate the necessary modifications in the argument in §4 to prove the theorem
stated in §1. (The only substantial matter is the compactness argument in (5.8) below-an increasing standard technique.) We maintain the notation of §4. For any compact oriented surface M of lype(p,ft),let ^(p,ft)denote its Teichmuller space
(5.1) and
7t:(/>,ft)->(2(n,ft)
(5.2)
the projection onto the corresponding moduli space [1],
Let a:dM-*-T cz N be a diffeomorphism carrying the ith component B, admissibly onto h
r,(l < i < k). Parametrizing each B, by [0,27t], we denote (as in (4.1)) by M* the ft' power of M, with each element u = { u , } . , .
. viewed as a component-preserving map dM-*dM.
Then
is well defined. As in §4 we let Q. ^(M, A^denote the C°-extensions M - . A 7 of the
tx°u:dM-*r
a
map a°u
which are C™ on the interior of M .
Again, our hypothesis (2.11) together with (2.7) insure that for any conformal structure /je(E{p,ft)aeJC*
and component
of l\. {M,
( h : ( M , i j ) - » { / V , A ) with <> |
(5.3)
N) there is a unique /i-harmonic map
a
= a ° u . Thus for each a.:dM-*Y,
that determines the
operator R = R„:3>\p,k) x Next we define
the energy
M"-^e {M,N). r
function J:Sip,k)
x Jt*-R
by (5.4)
J{u, ) U
1
=
-^JdR( , )fdxdy, U U
where that area element of M is obtained by using any conformal metric of u. Then composition k
with the projection of Teichmiiller space (5.1) gives a differentiable function ]\%p, ft) x M -* R on a cell. (5.5)
To verify that / satisfies Condition PSfflp, ft) x Jt*), we take a sequence {(im, ti^j such
that (5.6)
J^W*p)
(5.7)
D -/K".) „ „ \ - °
D
(
We form the Riemann surface double [M,
u ) m
3 3
n-™-
of each bordered surface ( M , ^ ) ; and endow it with
its Poincare metric of constant curvature (choosing the same constant for each). Then the lengths of the simple closed geodesies have a positive lower bound. That uses the uniform bound (5.6) and the irreducibility assumption (2.10); a case-by-case verification has been made in [10]; see also [11] in a somewhat different
context.
405 244
Chang Kungching James EeUa
(5.8)
Following the argument in [17]
similarly applied in [ I I . 10]
we conclude from
Mumford's compactness theorem that the sequence of conformal structures {p } is relatively m
compact in the moduli space of &t, and therefore has a subsequence converging to some conformal structure p on AY. Now by [16, Lemma 4.2] the energy is a continuous function of the conformal structure, so it is sufficient to use p = p\ ; and treat the subsequence of {u„} corresponding to that M
in its definition. Verification of Condition PS now follows that given in the second lemma of 54 The Corresponding conclusim of theorem A follows from the same argument plus [16, Theorem 1.8]. Again, we apply the mountain pass lemma to reach the stated Remark.
conclusion.
A moduli space for Riemann surfaces of type (0, k) has been constructed explicitly
by Shiffman [20], and applied by him to establish the theorem in case N — R". Shiffman's space is different
from S(0,fc).
Appendix In this appendix, we shall prove the following conclusion, which appeared in §4. Namely, Theorem A.
If u is a critical point of f with respect to M, then
The proof is divided into the following Lemma A. 1.
three steps.
2
For ueC ([0,2a], R ) and ere C'([0,2a], R), we have the identity:
l
where <|> = R{a). and we use a to denote both the function a itself and any C function defined on D with a as its boundary values. Proof.
In local coordinates, 2
0
\ 'h^WM"de Jo
= J* [*i(M*) U
+ Noticing
A+Hty
ff
]
+ h^tyA&tio-ldxdy.
dxd
y
(2)
that j" (h^WM^dxdy
obtain
= ^[^^((hi^^o- +
-Zh^W^a^dxdy,
406 .'45
Unstable Minimal Surface Coboundariefl
Substituting
(3) into (2), we have
+ Since (f •» J?(u)
is harmonic, the terms in the bracket vanish.
Lemma A. 2.
The linear functional
(4)
dp = A*(u),
defined
on
C'([0,2a], R ) ,
con
be
extended
continuously
to
ueC°flI^ ([0,2a],R). 2
Proof.
For tb = n*(u), V ^ R f f ) ,
"here
»,«€ (?([<),2n],R).
we have
- A (>r.
However,
= |J
d
- & W + A l» * i
[A (» $ (J
(j
s i q # - m^m^
f A
+ i * l | ) W g . + w*
g Mg U\v - u\\ ^ (IMI^ + L
- 44) + ( A » - M*)) * i « J ** dxdy -
£
M
L
1
*ii^ii*iiy
J + | _ \\^ ||„||^] S
A
7
M
c l
^
where M and M , are constants depending on the manifold A only. Similarly, we estimate the othe term.
407 246
Chang Kungch&ng James Eells
1
Since C {[0,2jr], R ) is dense in C f] L \
l 2
([0,2n], R ) , the extension is unique and is
continuous. Lemma A. 3.
If u is a critical point of f, then the distribution H
u
vanishes.
Proof. Firstly, we establish a formula for the Gateaux derivative of / . For any ffeC'([0,2n],R),
with Uy(0)|
define
pffl = 6 + (B),
ee(-l,l);
ea
thus,
We
1
obtain
for any u e C ([0,2a], R ) ,
= |^A(
Secondly, for usM, a°p
1
C
LLS(
®
7>.
does not satisfy the three point conditions in general, it is no
s
longer in M. However, there exists a conformal mapping IP,: D—>D, such that W, maps el
exp^iii"^"'^^!
into
p|^pJ * = °.
3
-
Let
t
<$
=
~
a
n
A
l e l
1
y =
-t °u°p; .
c
then
2
»• > c
y,eM. For
Since
any sequence
y*eM,
k
1
u € C ([0,2a], R ) ,
with u*-»u
we have
it follows
lim { /(a*), 4t
de
so.
I-D
if u is a critical point of / with respect to M. Therefore we obtain
According
to
(4.2)
and Lemma A. 2, <».,«> =0
We
conclude Proof
that H„ is icro in the
we have i
Vff6C ([0 2s],R). 1
distributional sense.
of the theorem A.
According to Lemma A. 3, we have proved k{§ ,
e
408 Unstable Minima! Surface Cobounda.-'ies
247
that A(
The polar representation (2.5) shows that the constant must be zero provided that z*n vanishes at z = 0. Therefore, we obtain »f»-0. References [ I ] Abikoff, W.. The real analytic theory of Teichmiiller space, Springer, Lecture Notes, No. 820 (1980). r :-' "I Chang, K -("].. Infinite dimensions] Morse theory and ita appbeationa. Lecture Notes of the 22nd Sem, Math. Sup. Montreal. 1983. [31 Chang K-C. and Eells. i.. Harmonic maps and minimal surfsce coboundaiiea. Lefschelz Centenary, Mexico City, 1984. [ 4 ] Douglas, J., Some new results in the problem of Plateau, J. Malh. Phys., 15 (1936), 55—64. [ 5 ] Douglas, J., Minimal surfaces of higher topological structure, Ann- Math., 40 (1939), 205—298. [ 6 J Bella, J, and Lemaire, L , A report oo harmonic maps. Bull. London Math. Soc-, 10 (1976), 1—68. [ 7 1 Bella, J. and Lemaire, L., Deformations of metrics and associated harmonic maps, Palodi Mem. Vol. Geometry and Analysis. Tata Inst. (1961), 33—45. [B ] Eells., J. and Sampson, J. H., Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, Amer. J. Math., 8a (1964), 109—160 [ 9 ] Jager, W. and Kaul, H., Uniqueness and stabUity of harmonic map* and their Jacuhifolds,Mur.u. nuilk.. 28 (I'JTy). 269—291. [10} jost, J. Conformal mapping? and the Plateau-Douglas problem. [II] Lemarire, L.. Boundary value problems for harmonic and r" l maps of surfaces into manifolds, Ann. Scuola Nor. Sup. Pisa, 9 (1982), 91—103. [12] Morrey, C. B., The problem of Plateau on a BJemannisn manifold, Ann. Math., 49 (1948). 807—851. [13] Morrey, C. B., Multiple integrals in die calculus of variations, Grundlehren Band, Springer, 130 (1960). [14] Morse, M. aod Tompkins, C. B., Tbe existence of minima) surfaces of general critical types, Ann. Math., 40 (1939). 443—472. [15] Morse, M. and Tompkins, C. B., Unstable minimal surfaces of higher structure, Duke Math. J., 8(1941), 350—375. [16] Sachs. J. and Uhlenbeck, K., Minimal immersions of closed Riemann surfaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 271 (1982), 639—652. [17] Schoen, R. and Yau, S-T, Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three dimensional manifolds with non-negative scalar curvature, Ann. Math-, 110 (1979), 127—142. [18] Shiftman, M., The Plateau problem for minims! surfaces of arbitrary topological structure. Amer. J. Math., 61 (1939), 853—882. [19] Shiftman, M-, Tbe Plateau problem for non-relative minima, Ann. Math., 40 (1939), 834—8S4. [20] Shiftman, M., Unstable minimal surfaces with several boundaries, Ann. Math., 43 (1942), 197—222. [21] Struwe.M., On a critical point theory f"? minimal surfac us spanning a wire in R", J. Reine Ang. Math., 349 (19B4), 1—23. [22] Struwe, M., A Morse theory for annul us—type minims) surfaces. [23] Tian, G„ On the mountain-pass lemma, Kexue Tongbao, 29 (1984), 1150—1154. !n!rna
409
HARMONIC MAPS BETWEEN SPHERES AND ELLIPSOIDS* Dedicated to Rene Thorn JAMES E E L L S A N D A N D R E A R A T T O Mathematics Institute University of Warwick Coventry, CV4 7AL England Received 14 November 1988
1.
Introduction
In this paper we establish several existence theorems for harmonic maps between Euclidean ellipsoids of the type Q"{a,b)= {(x,y)eW
+l
x U
q+1
2
2
: \x\ /a
2
4- \y\ /b
2
= L, with p + q + 1 = „, , b > 0}. a
For instance, take p = 1, q = n — 2: we have 2
2
3
Corollary 5.8. If n > 3, assume d /c > (n - 3) /4(n - 2). <Pa '• d) -* Q"(c, d) can be deformed to a harmonic map.
Then any map
Note that for n < 7 we can take d = c, thereby recovering Smith's theorem [27,28], The values n = I , . . . . 7, 9 are the only dimensions where the conclusion of Corollary 5.8 is known for Euclidean spheres. With other methods, Corollary 6.8. A map tp : Q"{a, b) -» S" of given degreefee Z can be deformed to a harmonic map, provided that the dilatation bja is sufficiently small {b/a may depend upon both n and fe). Q
2
2
2
Corollary 7.8. / / n > 3, assume d /c > {n — 3} /4(n - 2).
Then any map
More generally, we will show that the join of any two harmonic homogeneous polynomial maps of spheres can always be deformed to a harmonic map provided that suitable ellipsoidal metrics are introduced (see Theorems 5.1, 6.1, 7.1 below). In the context of the Hopf construction, we obtain
* This work was done at the Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientiiiques, 35, route de Chartres, 91440-Bures Sur Yvette, France.
1
International Journal of Mathematics Volume I No 1 (19°0| 1—27 © World Scientific Publishing Company
410 2
<
J. EELLS >nd A. RATTO
Theorem 8.3. Pk.i
For -*
:
any ft, i e Z there is an equivariant harmonic map HOfJi if op/ tnvarkott k-l iffQ (a,b) has dilatation s
b/a-\m\
(8.4)
Furthermore,
« « « - - S4f^V - s & ) ; - ("<»• ft (a)
ft
(a) y r sirrs
fr cos's/
Several different methods are needed in appropriate contexts to produce solutions which provide harmonic joins. Amongst them: 1) The direct method, based on weak lower semicontinuity of J—together with a special argument involving second variations of J (see Sees. 3, 5, 7). 2) Morse Theory on closed convex subsets in Hilbert spaces; and in particular the Mountain Pass Lemma (see Sees. 4, 6, 7). 3) Qualitative analysis of trajectories, using subsolutions, comparison theorems and a priori estimates (see Sees. 4, 8). Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge gratefully their indebtedness to Prof. W-Y Ding, whose fine paper [7] provided the impetus for the present one. They also greatly enjoyed the hospitality of the Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques, where this paper was written. 2.
Basic Constructions and Formulas
2.1. We shall be concerned with ellipsoids with axes of at most two different lengths, of the form: +
+
1
r2" * Vf3) = {(x,y)e W*
XR
, + 1
2
:|xf/a +
= 1}
411
HARMONIC MAPS B E T W E E N
SPHERES A N D ELLIPSOIDS
where a, b > 0 and vertical bars designate the indicated Euclidean norm. Sometimes we will write Q"(a,b) for Q"* * (a,b), slurring over the important dependence on the decomposition p + q + 1 = n. We call b/a the dilatation of Q " (a, b). The ellipsoid Qi> i (a, b) is parametrized by q
l
f+
+1
+ +1
z = a sin s • x + b cos s '• y 1
for x e S", y e S* and 0 < s < jr/2. The induced Riemannian metric on Q"' (a,b} is: t9+1
2
2
2
2
2
2
g = (a sin s),?,, + (f, cos s)0, + h (s)ds
(2.2)
where g , g denote the Euclidean metrics of S", S" and p
q
2
2
2
2
2
rj(s) = [fc sin s + a c o s s ] " . Its volume density is v
9
,
= t^''£>
p
sin s cos" sft(s)* v • v , SP
s
where v , v , are volume densities of the indicated Euclidean spheres. Also we will write SP
s
p
,
v - a t) sin''scos''s/i(s). p
+1
We shall refer to (Q *" {a,blg) as an ellipsoidal join of S", S" We observe that SO{p + 1) x SO{q + 1) is a group of isometries of {? * (a,i>); and that Q^+^a,b) and (2 (i>,a) are isometric. p+
+1
,+p+I
m
2.3. A map
2
\d
E(
s
Q-(i,b\
where, at each point x, \d
g
1
,
2
2
I
2
1
A * = <|p- ' d*| /|p- $| )p-
(2.4)
412 J. EELLS ud A. RATTO
c
P =
2
\o following the ellipsoidal join structure of <2"(c,(f); and A denotes the Laplacian of (Q {a, b), g). At each point, the right-hand member of (2.4) is the orthogonal projection of A
2
1
2
fA*, = IA c )
x
d )%
with 2
1
2
\d
2
\d
1
A =
2
Such harmonic maps are real analytic [12]. 1
2.5. An eigenmap uiS'-^y is one whose components (as a map into R " ) are hannonicfc-homogeneouspolynomials; its associated eigenvalue is A. = k(k + p — 1). It is easy to calculate that \du(x)\ = A, for all x e S ; and that H is a harmonic map. We refer to [8] for further details and examples. 2
p
1
Given two eigenmaps u: S" -* S? and r : S* - » S , we consider their join u * v, a map between ellipsoids
ip = H* r : e^'^Kfc)
(T^fc*.
indeed, for any continuous function 3 : [0, n, 2] -> [0. re 2] with 3(0) — 0, 3(rt 2) = n/2, we can define
for x e S , v e S*. and 0 < s <, n 2. We assume p, q > I. For such equivariant maps the energy functional E reduces (up to a constant factor) to 3
t^cos * . 2
h 2
2
2
2
1 2
2
a sin 2
2
2
fc cos
2
1
2
2
2
where Ji - [fc sin + a c o s ] ,fc(<x)= [ d sin * + c cos a ] " . Here and henceforth we have abbreviated sins by sin, ct(s) by at, etc
(2.6)
413
HARMONIC
17.
MAPS B E T W E E N SPHERES A N D ELLIPSOIDS
We define the Hilbert space
X = \xe
:
J
i . , ( [ C U 2].R): ||a|| = I
s
[ i + a > « i s < cc k
For p. (J > 1 the functional J is defined and smooth on A'. That is a consequence of the fact that h is bounded above and below by positive constants and of the following Sobolev inequality (for the Riemannian manifolds {[O.rt 2], sin''"-cos"), ([O.JI 2j. sin^cos"" !): 11
Lemma 18.
Dure is a constant such that for all z e A"
sr'siri*
2
cos"lis [i
- < const. 1
or sin'cos*
:
:
+ jr ] sin'cos* lis.
ds
jo If either p — 1 or q — 1. we extend the definition of J , allowing it to assume the value + cc. 2.9.
The directional derivative of J at a in the direction 1 e X is
a- + Jo 2. 10.
[
,
.
, -
a-sin'
r I sin 3 cos x
—
f>"eos"
The Euler-Lagrange equation associated with the reduced energy J is cos Jt +
p-
sin
h\ .
q
sin
.»
J + -—-x-
cos
hI
rr / i"A„
dv. . t
T
= 7T--ri
k[x)
k-{x) \a- sin-
sin 3 cos a.
h~ cos-
Here )i = Jh Js. and k' = .ii Ja, This has the form 5 + D(s)i + G{s. x. i) sin x cos J = 0. which is a sort of spherical pendulum with damping D and variable gravity G. 2.10'.
An equivalent form of (2.10) is J i k[x) :
u sin 2.11. is
:
2
2
r» COS 7\
For any critical point x e A" and variation
fcfx)
the corresponding second \ariation
414
6
J EELLS and A. RATTO
2
dK
2
cX
u
COS'
3.
cos 2a
Existence Methods
3.1.
2
The following are standard properties of integrals / : L {M, JV) - » I R of the form
I(
2
LA(x,
B{xMx))l*v„
JM
where * v is the volume form of M; M, N are compact, A,B: M x JV -* U are smooth functions, and A > 0. M
3.2. For p, q > 1 lAe functional J : A" -* R is weakly lower semicontinuous. I.e., for any sequence a , ( a , ) ^ in A such that the inner products -4 /?> f ° /UJT.then -
r
0
f
0
J(a ) < lim infj ./(aj). 0
Consequently, J assumes its minimum on weakly compact subsets of X; these are just those subsets which are weakly closed and bounded in norm. In particular, J assumes its minimum on the closed convex set X
0
= {a E X : 0 < a(s) < n/2 for all s t= [0,TI/2]}.
Let a e X realize that minimum 0
Jiot) = m[{J(a):eieX<>}.
(3.3)
Proposition 3.4. Assume that p, q > 1. Then J : X ~> U satisfies the compactness condition of Palais-Smale: If ( a , ) i is XQ is a sequence on which J is bounded and for which dJictj) - » 0 as i -» + oo, then a subsequence of (a,) converges in X . 0
2 I
0
Proof. First we assume c=l=d and follow [7]: we have noted in (2.7) that J is smooth for p, q > 1. Now we observe that (HaJD^i is bounded, because (J(a;)) i is and a, e X . Thus a subsequence, still denoted by (a,), converges weakly to some i2
0
The weak convergence insures that
rm '•
(a, - Xjfvds ->0
as i,j ->• co.
415 HARMONIC MAPS B E T W E E N SPHERES A N D E L L I P S O I D S
From (2.9) (with k = 1) we see that dVlaiKa, - otj) = j
^ 2 « t ( « i - •*;) + L- sinstjcosa,(a - a )jvtis, (
y
where L =
2
a sin
2
2
b cos
2
Expressing dJ{a,)(a - a,) similarly, taking their difference, and using the hypothesis that these directional derivatives are 0(1) (i.e., they go to zero as i,j -*. + co), we have (
o(i)-(0(<^-tt/(tV)(«i-«() Vf
=J
' i ' n
s+
* J
[L(sin a; cos a - uncCtC08«tj)(ri, — a,-)] yds. ;
The second integral is 0(1); that is seen by writing it as a sum over [0, e], [njl - 6, rc/2] and [e, n/2 - e], and estimating each separately. Because h is bounded above and below by positive constants, we conclude that f8*(ft ij) vds is 0(1); i.e., (aj) is a Cauchy sequence in X , and hence convergent. In order to handle the case d/c T * 1, it is convenient to express the energy functional (2.6) in terms of different coordinates on Q +*+ (c,d): let 2
—
2
i2j
0
r
(
l
= />(j) = j* k{r)dr
0<s£n/2.
In terms of coordinates (x,y,t), x e S', yeS' f 2 ( c , d) is expressed by
and 0 < t < P(rt/2), the metric on
r+,+,
2
0
2
= e » / f t f c + d / (t) 2
Sj
+ dt
2
where 1
/ (t) = sin(/'- (t)),
/ (0 = COS(P-'(0).
1
j
Thus the reduced energy functional (2.6) takes the form 1/2
3m-
1
h
2
a sin
2
2 2
cos b cos 2
J
By construction, J(a) = J(P(a)). Because / , and f behave qualitatively hke sin and cos, the Palais-Smale condition can be proved easily, using the same arguments as in the case c = d=i. 2
416 J. EELLS and A. RATTO
8
3.5. The qualitative theory of critical points of differentiable functions has been adjusted to include domains which are closed convex subsets of Banach spaces ([6], [29]). Proposition 3.4 enables us to apply that theory: in particular, we have a Mountain Pass Lemma 3.6. Assume p,q>\. Let Oe X be an isolated local minimum of J:X ->U, and assume there is an oceX {0} such that J(ct) = J(0). Then there is a critical pointfie Xo with J(^) > J(0). In particular, if I has two isolated local minima, then it has another critical point in X (which is not an absolute minimum). 0
0
0
0
3.7. Proposition 3.4 also provides a version of the Morse inequalities, provided the critical points of J : X -> R are isolated. We refer to [6] for further details. 0
Remark 3.8. In this section we have shown the existence of certain critical points of J : X -> K; they all satisfy the Euler-Lagrange equation (2.10). That can be seen by proving that they are also critical points of a simply modified functional J* : X -* U [7] which also has (2.10) as its Euler-Lagrange equation. 0
4.
Properties of Solutions
4.1. We apply the transformation tan s = e\ t e U to (2.10). With the notation A{t) = a (arctan e'), and H{t) — h (arctan e'), that equation becomes
sin A cos A 2
k (A) The following is an extension of a basic lemma of [28]; the proof uses ideas from [23]. Lemma 4.2. and
If ae X is a non-constant solution of (2.10), then A'(t) > 0 for all t e U; 0
lim
A(t) = 0,
hm
,4(1) = rt/2;
( - - I C
(4.3) i.e.,
lim a(s) = 0,
Hm <x(s) = 7t/2. s-*n/2
Proof.
We begin by observing that 0 <-4(1) < JI/2
forallreK.
(4.4)
For if -4(7^) = 0 for some t £ K, then A'tJ) ^ 0; for otherwise A = 0. Thus A would assume negative values, and consequently a could not belong to X . Similarly, A does not assume the value n/2. 0
417
H A R M O N I C
MAPS
B E T W E E N SPHERES AND
9
ELLIPSOIDS
2
2
2
2
We proceed to show that A' > 0 on 0*: let r„ be the solution of c X e~'/a — d X e'/b . Suppose A'(t) — 0 for some i < t . Because A is real analytic and non-constant, the zeros of A' are isolated, so there is an e > 0 such that A'(t) ?6 0 for T— e
e
0
r$+m?U^QM
(4.5)
where 2
2
(d — c )sin AcosAA' "
W
[A
n m- ? Q.W-2H
H
1
e
2 r ^ -
^
sin
2
d Xy~\
~ '
+
H
(€- + €-')
2
~
k (A)
cos A ACQ P
I
'
Then P (() = &,{() on (r — E,T), because a is a solution of (2.10). Therefore the function Y(t) = 1 is a solution of (4.5) on ft — 6,7), expressible as a
-
_
_ mr)eM£rMdu}dr
+ c
s
for some te(7e,t) and c e R . If Tis the first point where —o> < T < Fand^'(T) = 0, then (4.6) holds for t e (T,t). The explicit formula for (4.6) is (see [23]) 1 =N(t)/D(t)
for r e (T,F),
(4.7)
where
«* - j;
-^ ]
*. +
and 2
2
l
fifl) = (A') (l + e- ') -"(l
3
2
+ e'')^^ M)(«(0)" -
Then, for all t e {T,i), we have N(C) > 0; JV'(t) 5* 0; Moreover
(4.8) because
# 0, 0 < A(t) < n/2 and t ^ t . 0
(4,9)
418 10
J. E E L L S tod A. R A T I O
4.10. T = -oo; for otherwise 0(7") = 0, and so N(T) = 0 by (4.7). This, together with N(7) - 0 and (4.8), tell us that N must have an interior maximum on [T,T} contradicting (4.9). t
We conclude from (4.10) that A' ^ 0 on ( - co, 7) and that (4.7) holds there. But there must be points t e ( —oo,F) at which A'(i) is arbitrarily close to 0; for if A' is bounded away from zero, the values of the solution A would not remain in [0, a/2]. Thus D, and consequently N, must have values arbitrarily close to zero. That, together with N(t) — 0 and (4.8), insure that N has a local maximum in { —oo.F), contradicting (4.9). That means that there is no F < t such that A'(7) - 0. Similarly we find that there is no 7> t for which A'(7) — 0. 0
0
Moreover, A' < 0 on R is not possible; for otherwise ( would be a minimum or N, again leading to a contradiction. Therefore A' > 0 on R, which guarantees the existence of the limits lim -4(t)and lim ,4(r). 0
The condition 0 < A(t) < n/2 insures that for any small e > 0 and any large C > 0 there is i > C (or t < - C ) with ,4'(r) < £, |/4"(f)l < e: otherwise A would go out of bounds. Therefore inspection of (4.1) shows that the only limits possible are those of (4.3). Henceforth we shall say that a solution a of (2.10) with limits (4.3) is (or provides) a harmonic join. Here is a basic a priori estimate: Lemma 4.11.
Let a provide a harmonic join. Then J(oi) < J(0).
Proof. *I2
m
- mi
=
2
kM
2
dL
2
cK a sin
1/2
2
2
2
2
fc cos
vds.
From (2.10') we have 2
2
c l. 2
a sin
dk 2
2
6 cos
2
:;sin a)v-)i( }tan ^^«v a
d
0M, ds\ fr
a
i
\ j
2
k (a)fk'(a) ft* \k(a)
1 cos a, 2
Therefore ' k'(a) 1—rr^tanct
J ( a ) - J ( 0 ) = 1/2
1 =
«/2
—T~2—vds+ 1/2—3— (tana)av
o
The last term is zero: this is because the asymptotic behavior of a is qualitatively as in the case k (ot) = 1 3 A ; thus the well-known asymptotic estimates of [28] can be used to prove our assertion. 2
2
419
H A R M O N I C MAPS B E T W E E N SPHERES
2
2
A N D ELLIPSOIDS
2
2
11
2
By using the explicit expression fc (a) = [ d sin a + c cos a], an elementary computation shows that
2
* <4l-^tana-^J=-^ fc(«)
cos a J
In conclusion we have xfl 2
J{a) - J(0) = -d /2
2
I o
tan a ^ ds < 0, "
so the Lemma is established. Proposition 4.12. Let p, q > 1 and assume J(TT/2) > J(Q). Then there is a harmonic join a iff 0 e X is an unstable critical point of J: X ^> U. 0
0
Proof. If 0 is unstable, then the minimum a {as in (3.3)) provides a harmonic join by Lemma 4.2. Conversely, assume first p, q > 1 and suppose that 0 were stable. If a provides a harmonic join, then Lemma 4.11 assures us that J ( a ) < J(0); moreover, because of Proposition 3.4, we can apply the Mountain Pass Lemma 3.6 to J on the closed convex set 0
0
y„ = {a e X : 0 < a(s) < a (s)
for all s e [0,7t/2]}
0
to conclude that there is a solution /J which provides a harmonic join; and J(/3)> J{0), That contradicts Lemma 4.11. If p — 1, q > 1 or p = I = q, then a modification [7] of the previous argument can be used to complete the proof of our Proposition. 5.
Harmonic Maps between Ellipsoids r
Theorem 5.1. Let u :S"->S and v.S" ~* S" be eigenmaps, p, q> I . Assume that there are a, b,c,d > 0, with a > b, such that 2
2
2
2
(q-l)X b /a >(p-l)X d /c ; a
(5.2)
v
and 2
2
(q-\)
2
(5.3) p
i
1
+:i , ,
Then there is an equivariant harmonic map
t
(opic to u*v. Furthermore, ifp = 1, f/ien tJie assumption a> b is unnecessary. Proof. Step I: We take the minimum a e A" , as in (3.3). If a £ 0 or 7t/2, then a provides a harmonic join by Lemma 4.2. 0
420 J. EELLS and A. AATTO
12
Step 2: We prove that J(n/2) > J(0) If p = 1, this is obvious because J(TI/2) = + co. If p > I, then (5.2) forces q > 1 and integration by parts gives In — }\} r
2
2
2
C"
J r tn 2
JinflMa'b" = =
s>n>co$''- hds+
t
2
2
-
C"
'
2 ( p - \)a J 0 2 ( p - \)a The second term is non-negative because a > b, so 2
12
— h\
1
sin" cos* Ji" ds.
2
But (5.2) ensures that the term in parentheses is non-negative. Step 3: Assumefirstq > 1. We show that 0 e X is unstable: we calculate the second variation at 0 for Ding's variations § = sin cos" , with suitable n, r (to be chosen in the course of the proof). Following (2.11), we obtain 0
n
VV(0)({,{)/W= I
(
h
r
2
2
2
--^)sin^ -cos"- '-
2
bds
+ Restrict n > 0,0 < r < (g — l)/2. As a function of r, the second integral in (5.4) remains bounded as r -* (q - l)/2. Now we show that the first integral in (5.4) tends to - c o as r-*(q— I)/2: it follows that 0 e X is unstable. When r increases to (q - l)/2, the first integral in (5.4) is clearly smaller than 0
2
2
Now we observe that lim h (s) — b : thus (5.3) enables us to conclude that the term s-n/2
in parentheses is strictly negative on 0 / 2 - e,7r/2] for a suitable small E > 0 (independent ofr). We write the integral (5.5) as the sum of two pieces fn/2-i
n/2 0
=
JO
|*it/2 +
J
n/2-t
Now we let r tend to (q — l)/2: the first integral in the sum is clearly bounded; the second integral tends to - c o , because the exponent of cos in (5.5) tends to —1 as
421
H A R M O N I C MAPS B E T W E E N SPHERES
2
A N D ELLIPSOIDS
13
-1
t -* (q - l)/2,and the integral J^J _ c o s ds is divergent. This completes the proof that 0e is unstable, and consequently we have 7(a) < 7(0). In case q= I, then 7(a) < 7(0) is obvious because J{0) = + co. That a is a harmonic join now follows from Step 1. The assumption a > b has been used only in Step 2 to prove that J(n/2) > 7(0); we have noticed that, ifp = I , then J(n/2) = + 0 0 : thus in this case the assumption a > b is clearly unnecessary. That ends the theorem. t
Remarks, i) The arguments of Step 3 include as a particular case a more explicit proof of Lemma 2.4 of [7]; in particular, our proof shows that the choice n large as in [7] is unnecessary. ii) We observe that if 4A >{p— l)(q — 1), then there are a, b,c,d > 0 which satisfy the hypotheses of Theorem 5.1. iii) The proof shows that restriction (5.2) most certainly can be relaxed somewhat by improving the estimate of J(n/2) — J(0). U
1
e
Example 5.6. We apply Theorem 5.1 to the eigenmaps u = u : S -* S \ u (e' ) — e , k E Z, and 0 = id : S"~ -> S"" the identity map, n > 3. We obtain k
m
2
t
2
Corollary 5.7. For any a, b > 0 there is an equivariant harmonic map u^ *„ id — tp: Q"(a,b) ->Q"(c d) of degree k provided that d /c > (n - i) /4(n - 2). 2
2
2
1
In particular, we can take a = c, b = d, so that we have 2
2
2
Corollary 5.8. If n > 3, assume d /c > (n - 3) /4(n - 2).
Then any map
Harmonic Maps from Ellipsoids to Spheres p
Theorem 6.1. Let p, q>l. Given eigenmaps u:S -*S' positive numbers a, b and an equivariant harmonic map tp =
+
+1
q
s
and o: S ~* S , there are
s+l
u* v:Q' * (a,b)^S'+ a
homotopic to u * v. Proof. Step 1: First assume p, q > 1. To prove the theorem we shall prove there exist a, b with respect to which the functional J of (2.6), with k s 1, satisfies 2
J(n/2) - J(0).
(6.2)
That is sufficient for the existence of a harmonic join. In fact, suppose not: take any such a, b, and let a e X be a function as in (3.3) at which J assumes its minimum. Then 7(a) > 7(0); for otherwise a would be a harmonic join by Lemma 4.2. We conclude that both 0 and n/2 are minima of J on X . Then the Mountain Pass Lemma 3.6, together with Lemma 4.2, ensure that J has another critical point oTe X with limits (4.3). But J{ti) > 7(0), which contradicts Lemma 4.11. 0
0
0
422 J. EELLS ind A. RATT0
14
Step 2: Thus we are led to estimate the difference
J(n/2) - J(0) = ~
1
j " * * ftf sin'" cos* - ^ s i
We compare that with the corresponding difference using the integral taking a = 1 = b: integration by parts gives
obtained by
3
J,(x/2) - J,(0) = 1 / 2 ^ -
sin"- cos*d . S
There are three possibilities: Case (p — 1)A„ = (q — l)X : In this case obviously (5.2) holds with a = 1 = b. Case Ip - \)X > lq - 1)2 : For any dilatation bja > (p - l)XJ(q — l)X„ > 1 we have u
V
U
/(K/2) = — 2 Jo
-±sin'a 2
2
cos* hds.
But 6 > /t > a on (0,n/2), so
W2)>^^rsin^cos* 2 o Jo
(
i
s
2
=
1
^ ^ \ " sin"cos*" ds 2 (p - l ) i Jo
a(p - \)X„ Because J is continuous in (a,b), that inequality, together with / (it/2) < J^O), assure the existence of a, b > 0 with (
(p-l)A„/(q-l)A„>fc/5>l
(6.4)
and with respect to which J(n/2) = J(0). Case (p — \)X < (q — 1)A„: We argue as above, obtaining a, b > 0 with V
( P - W ( 4 - W
B
(6.5)
and with respect to which J(nj2) = J(Q). That completes the proof of the theorem in case p, q > L Remark. Of course, it is of interest to estimate bja: a more detailed analysis shows that, in the second and third cases respectively, we actually have
423 H A R M O N I C
MAPS BETWEEN
SPHERES
AND ELLIPSOIDS
15
i)V
UP -
(6.6) < b/a <
~(P -
i)V
(9Step 3: Case p = 1 = q. Here J(JT/2) = J ( O ) = -f-co. By using Lemma 4.2 we see Ihat the minimum a is a harmonic join. Step 4; Case p = 1, a, > 1. Now 7(71/2) = + 0 0 . The study of the second variation at 0 e X shows that 0 is unstable provided that b/a is sufficiently small. The dilatation b/a which makes 0 unstable may depend upon l . The proof of the statements in Step 4 is based on computational arguments whose exposition is omitted; the case p > 1, q — 1 is similar. 0
u
6.7.
With other methods. Smith [27] proved the following
Proposition.
s
Let u:S" -* S' and v :S"^S be 2
two eigenmaps and assume 2
( -i) <4A ,(fl-i) <4;.„. P
u
Then, for any choke of a,b > 0, there exist an equivariant harmonic map +
r+si
,
u* v•.Q<'+'> '(a,b)->S - . a
We notice that the application of this Proposition to the eigenmaps of Example (5.6) is possible only for n < 7. But Theorem 6.1, applied to eigenmaps as in (5.6), gives Corollary 6.8. A map
7. Harmonic Maps from Spheres to Ellipsoids The following theorem is due to Ding [7] and Petrinati-Ratio [20], in case d/c = 1. Their methods are different; here we follow that of Ding. Existence of harmonic joins of the form u * v: S -*. Q"(c, d) was asserted by Baird in Chapter 9 of [1]: however, his maps are not harmonic, because his basic equation lacks the term involving A . m
a
2
Theorem 7.1. Let p, q > 1. Given eigenmaps u :S ->S and v: S -* S there is an equivariant harmonic map u*,v: S * -* Q ( c , i i ) iff the dilatation d/c satisfies the ellipsoidal damping conditions p
p
q+l
r+s+1
r
q
s
424
J E E L L S and A. R A T T O
16
i) (q -
E D C 1)
\)
2
2
<
AX d /c
2
v
or n
y/G
2
-
D + 4A„ + J{q
-
1)' - AX d*lc
2
v
+
q-2
and i) (p -
E D C 2)
3
l) <
AX^jd
2
or 2
2
2
.ii) s / i - I ) + 4A„ + V ( - l ) - 4 V A *
2
< P+ 9 - 2
P
Proof.
We begin by remarking that (with a = 1 = b in (2.6)) J(TI/2) > 7(0)
iff (7.2) 2
( 9 - l ) A _ > ( p - l)A„dVc . We shall now assume that (7.2) holds. With that hypothesis we study the second variation of J at 0: by using (2.11), we have:
VV,0,K.^c'[""^ ( ^-^ )^]v +
s
i
i s
.
3
This expression shows that, apart from a constant factor c , the only difference between this general case d/c ^ 1 and the case c — 1 = d is that now X has become X d jc . Therefore the use of variations as in Lemma 2.4, 2.5 of [ 7 ] (with X„ replaced by X„d lc ) tells us that 0 is unstable iff E D C 1) holds. Because of (7.2), we can apply Proposition 4.12 and conclude that there is a harmonic join if and only if E D C 1) holds. In the next lemma we show that E D C I) together with (7.2) imply E D C 2). 2
v
2
2
B
2
Lemma 7.3.
Proof.
/ / E D C I) and (7.2) hold, then E D C 2 ) is satisfied. 2
2
Otherwise, (p - l ) > 4X c /d
2
a
J{q
- l)
2
+ 4X + Jlp
-
V
and 2
I) - 4X c*/d u
2
>
P
+
q
- 2 .
After squaring both members of the last inequality, we conclude that either 2
2X„ - 2X c /d u
or (squaring again)
2
> (p -
l)(q - 1)
(7.4)
425 H A R M O N I C MAPS B E T W E E N SPHERES AND E L L I P S O I D S
2
2
2
< ((p - 1 ) 4 -
2
\)X c /d )(p
17
+ q-2).
u
(7.5)
We have arrived at a contradiction: on one hand, (7.5) is not possible, by (7.2). And from (7.4) we find that 2
(p - l) (q - 1) + 2(p - \)X c*ld a
2
2
2
< 2(p - L $ U
2
by using the assumption (p - I) > 4A c /d we obtain u
2
2
{2(q - 1) + (p - \j)X c /d
< (p -
u
1)4
and consequently 2
2
{q-\)X c /d
<(p-\)X
a
v
again contradicting (7.2). So the Lemma is proved. Similarly, if (7.2) does not hold, then E D C 2) is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a harmonic join; also, by arguments analogous to Lemma 7.3, if E D C 2) holds and (7.2) does not, then E D C 1) is satisfied. That completes the demonstration of Theorem 7.1. Remark. The comparison method introduced in [20] is not suitable for the case c d, because of the presence of the term a in the gravity G. By way of contrast, the method of [20] can be applied to prove Theorem 6.1. 2
7.6. Inspection of the ellipsoidal damping conditions reveals that: If p = 1, then E D C 2) holds for d/ce{0, +oo). Ifp > 1, then there is an e > Ofor which E D C 2) holds iff J/ce(0,£ ). Similarly, if q = 1, then E D C 1) holds for d/c e (0, + co). And if q > 1, then there is an > 0 for which E D C 1) holds iff d/c e (e,, + oo). Of course, e, and e can be explicitly expressed by elementary operations with numbers in E D C 1), E D C 2). We have 2
2
2
p +
+ 1
S
Corollary 7.7. Consider equivariant maps u*,v: S * Q'+ *'(c,d) as in Theorem 7.1. / / p = 1 = q, then there is a harmonic join for every dilatation d/c e (0, +co). Ifp = l,q > 1, there is an Ei > Oand such a solution iff d/c e ( E , , +co). Ifp > 1, q = 1, there is an e > 0 and such a solution iff d/c e (0, E ) . / / p > 1, q > 1, there is a solution iff d/c e { E , , + c o ) r i ( 0 , £ 2 ) — (£i,£ ) interval ( E ^ E ^ is not empty because 2
2
: t n e
2
#c = y ( a - l U „ / ( p - l U „ £ ( £ , ,
£ !
).
This is precisely the dilatation which insures J(n/2) — J(Q) (see (7,2)). Application of Theorem 7.1 to the eigenmaps of example (5.6) yields another proof of Corollary 5.7 in case a = 1 = b:
426 18
L EELLS and A. RATIO 2
2
2
Corollary 7.8. / / n > 3, assume d /c > (H - 3) /4(n - 2).
Then any map
0
Remarks 7.9. i) Note the special feature that the dilatation d/c of Q"(c, d) in Corollary 7.8 (and Corollary 5.8) depends only on n (compare with Corollary 6.8). ii) Takingc = 1 = J , Corollary 7.8 and Corollary 5.8 recover Smith's Theorem [28], because they guarantee the existence of a harmonic map in each ciass if n < 7; however, they do not include the case n = 9 of Eells-Lemaire [11]. 1
6
6
iii) Let u = u : S' -* S (as in 5.6) and v = id : S -* S . Then E D C 1) and E D C 2) are satisfied iff d/c e (1, + co). Thus we can assert the existence of an equivariant harmonic map u *, id: S -»Q {c, d) of degree 2 for any dilatation d/c > 1; but there definitely is not such for d/c = I, as remarked in [20]. A similar phenomenon occurs if u is replaced by any eigenmap of polynomial of degree 2. 2
8
B
2
2
Those conclusions pertain to the case where p — 1, q = 6, and u has polynomial degree 2. By way of contrast, there is an equivariant harmonic map tp:S -* S of Brouwer degree 2 associated with p = 0, q = 7 (see (8.8) of [8]); however, that lies outside the scope of Theorem 7.1. 3
3
8
1
Example 7.10. Let u : S - » S be the Hopf fibration; that is an eigenmap with X = 8. Again, let v: S " -* S " , n > 4, be the identity map; so A„ = n - 3. Consider their ellipsoidal join u*v: S -* Q"(c,d). The ellipsoidal damping conditions are satisfied iff -3
-3
a
n + 1
2
2
(„ _ 4)2/4( _ 3) < d /c M
2
2
2(n - 6)/(« - 3) < d /c
< 8
n = 4,5,6,7,8
< 8
n > 9. n
Smith [28] has shown that for 3 < n < 8 the nontrivial class in 7 t ( S ) = Z has a harmonic representative ip: S ~* S". Theorem 7.1 implies that for any n > 4 and any dilatation d/c satisfying (7.11) the nontrivial class in n (S'') has a harmonic representative tp: S" -* Q"{c,d). n+1
2
n+l
+1
n+1
In particular, we observe that for n > 4, (7.11) is always satisfied provided that /2
10
9
Remark. The join construction does not have convenient symmetry in the case of the first suspension; i.e., for v.S°-*S° the identity map. That can be remedied by change of parameter: we will sketch the necessary modifications in Sec. 9. In particular, we will show that there is an equivariant harmonic representative tp : S* -* Q {c,d) of the first suspension of the Hopf map u: S -* S iff 0 < d /c < 8; this completes the characterization given in (7.11). i
3
2
2
2
427 HARMONIC MAPS BETWEEN SPHERES AND ELLIPSOIDS
8.
19
2
Representing (he Classes of
n (S ) 3
l
8.1.
1
l
Fix integers k, I and define the multiplication f , = f ;S x S -* S by e") = where 0 < 11 < 2n. With it Hopf associated the map h : S -* S by writing the points ofS as sins- e' + coss-e'' , 0 < s < n/2; those of S as sint-e + cos I, 0 <, y < 2n and 0 < t < n; and defining hfoms-e't + coss'e ) = sia(2s)f{e ,e ' ) + cos(2s). Its homotopy class is represented by Hopf's linking invariant k • I e Z = rt (S ). k
3
2
3
(
f
1
2
ij
in
it
i 1
3
3
8.2. The Hopf fibration is the case k = i — /. I t is a harmonic Riemannian fibration (with adjustment of radii). Composition with the (weakly) conformal map dj .S -* S given by Oj[z) = z' is a harmonic morphism
3
2
2
f
}
3
3
r
2
3
We study equivariant maps
2
defined by
kl
l4
1
ki+ 1
+ bcoss-e" ) — s'ma(s)-e' ' '' + cosa(s)
where tt: [0, JT/2] -<• [0, n] satisfies «(0) = 0, «(w/2) = w. Smith [28] has shown that in the case where k # I there is no equivariant harmonic map (p : S -* S . That is a matter of verifying that the equation 2
3
2
2
kl
A" — — — sin A cos A e' + e~* has no solution with lim ,4(() = 0, lim A(t) — n. By way of contrast, we prove Theorem 8.3. For any k, I E Z there is an equivariant harmonic map
1
=
3
b/a = \l/k\.
(8.4)
Furthermore
Proof.
sin cos ds. + b cos J sin a jftsi 2
Step 1: The reduced energy functional is
Its Euler-Lagrange equation is
2
z
(8.5)
428 J. E E L L S and \- R A T I O
a+
/cos \sm
sin
h\ 7 ) H/
cos
a
=
2
{
2
k I V , . 2 - 2+ n j- " sinacosa; \ a sin' fr cos' /
,„ (8.6)
or, after the transformation tans = e\ t e R,
2
A" = ^rA' + Gtf sin .4 cos .4,
(8.7)
where 4 : U -» [0, rr] is given by A(t) = a(arctan e'), H{t) = /i(arctan e'), and 2
2
2
( f / f t V + (fe /fl ) -' e
G
W
=
+
We look for solutions with the limits lim -4(0 = 0, lim A(t) = n. f -»—co f -• +CO 2
2
2
(8.8)
2
Step 2: For the necessity, we suppose I /k # b /a and that there is a solution ,4 of (8.7) with limits (8.8). We argue as in the proof of Lemma 4.2. to find that A' > 0. As an equation in H, (8.7) has a prime integral of the form [22]
2
H —
^ ^ 2jL Gsinylcos/4/l''
(8 9) ' '
1
CD
Now for \t\ large, (8.7) is qualitatively like the equation of a pendulum with constant gravity and no damping. Therefore (8.8) ensures that lim A'(t) = 0. That, together with (8.9), implies that
G sin-4 cos ,4,4' = 0.
2
2
2
2
We have arrived at a contradiction; for if l /k ^ b /a , then G is strictly monotone, and so that integral ^ 0. Step 3: To prove the sufficiency, we now have G = k /a (= l fb ) in our equation (8.7). Without loss of generality we can assume that k, / have the same sign. TakeFe R and 0 < s < n/2; by well-known properties of pendulum equations there is a solution A of (8.7) such that 2
A(J) = e;
lim
2
2
2
,4(0 = 0. (8.10)
A'(t) > 0
for all i e { - o o , £ ~ ] . J
429
H A R M O N I C M A P S B E T W E E N SPHERES
AND ELLIPSOIDS
21
We show next that A also satisfies (8.8). Firstly, the explicit form of (8.9) is fV
+ftV
2
(A')
(8.11)
sin A
e' + e
Now A[t) e (0,7t) for all t e Rj for if („ is the first point such that A{t ) = 0, then -4'('o) = 0 as well by (8.11), and that contradicts the uniqueness of the solution to the initial value problem for (8.9). Similarly we show that every A < a. 0
We conclude that A' > 0 and (8.11) holds on all R. Consequently, lim A(t) exists; and it is easy to see that this limit is Tt. Step 4: Finally, to verify that
At a point (£, n, s) we construct an orthonormal base {e ,e ,e } T ^, Q (a,b) with respect to the metric 1
2
3
of the tangent space
3
i4
s)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
g = (a s m ' ) d £ + (t> cos )dr, + h ds : 1
1 e, =
e
-57.
a sins r;
i =
h{s) ds
b cos s dt;
2
Similarly, on S we use coordinates (y,t) as in (8.1), with 0 < y < In, 0 < ( < n. The vectors 1 6 3 sin r dy' dt
(8.12)
2
form an orthonormal base of T S . The differential of the map ip\ =
l)
A
d
ii_d_ a sin dy
I d dtp(e ) = — it cos dy
(8.13)
2
ad
It follows that Ker(dV) is spanned by the vector v = sin ?i — cos e \ and so an orthonormal base for its orthogonal complement is {e , w), where w = c o s ^ + sine . It is clear from (8.12) and (8.13) that dip preserves the orthogonality between e and w. Thus to verify horizontal conformality it suffices to show 2
3
2
3
2
2
\\dip(e )\\ = \\d
W
(8.14)
430 22
J.
EELLS and A.
RATTO
But fd
2
2
3
1
mm = 3
sin a 2
2
a sin cos The transformation tans = e' carries (8.14) into (8.11), which we know is true. The proof of the theorem is completed by a routine analysis to check that horizontal conformality is also valid across the loci where s = 0 and s — n/2. Moreover, if C(ip ) = {x e Q (a, b): d
i
k
kil
kl
kl
tv) if
9* 1, f y& 1, then C[
Corollary 8.15.
2
For any ellipsoid Q (c, d) and k,teZ
2
with Hopf invariant k • /, provided l /k
2
there is a harmonic morphism
— b ja . 2
2
2
In particular, if a — b, then k = + /, and the Hopf invariant of \ji is ± k . Those harmonic morphisms have been classified [3]. Proof of the Corollary is immediate, for there is a conformal diffeomorphism y: S -* Q (c,d), which is a harmonic morphism. Then
2
2
kA
k
8.16. There are many other special features of Theorem 8.3, some of which we indicate now: Remark 1. Because
k l
3
Remark 2. The solution A to (8.7) satisfying (8.8) found using (8.10) is not unique: others can be obtained by letting s vary in (8.10). That produces variations of cp through equivariant harmonic morphisms. kA
Remark 3. In Sees. 5, 6 we established the existence of equivariant harmonic maps from ellipsoids to spheres, for dilatations lying in suitable open intervals. By way of contrast, Theorem 8.3 produces such a map for a unique dilatation. That interesting phenomenon is related to the presence of variations through equi-
431 HARMONIC MAPS B E T W E E N S P H E R E S AND E L L I P S O I D S
23
variant harmonic maps. In particular, such variations determine Jacobi fields, and hence degeneracy of the Hessian V E{
t
3
Remark 4.
We can consider on S Riemannian metrics of the form 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
g = a sin d$ + b cos d
2
Y {s)ds .
3
Then Theorem 8.3 holds with (S , g) in place of Q {a, b); the proof is the same. 8.17. Hopf's construction: The construction in (8.1) is only a particular case of the Hopf construction. We recall that a (X,, A )-eigenmap / : S" x S" -» S" is one which is an eigenmap in each variable separately. We have the notion of ellipsoidal Hopf construction, a map
+1
, tl
f
In analogy with (8.5), its reduced energy functional is
Its Euler-Lagrange equation is / cos a +\p\ sin
2
sin
1
2
k\ . fc'fa) , h ( cX dX \ . T « + 7 7 ^ « =717-: " T ^ z +7^ J Sinacosa, hj lc(a) fe-'(a) sm* o^cos'/ 1
q cos
2
in interesting contrast with (2.10). In the case b/a = d/c = 1, existence has been proved [24] under the assumptions (p — \} > 4i {q — l ) > 4X ; the proof is based on a direct study of the harmonicity equation, using comparison arguments. 2
2
lt
2
The variational approach of this paper does not immediately apply to that situation. However, we can exploit the symmetry of J (also in the case of the first suspension and the Dirichlet Problem (see Sec. 9)), bringing to bear a version of equivariant Morse theory. Very briefly: i) The space J ? = {a e X : 0 £ a(s) £ it for all s e [0, n/2]} is a closed convex set; its boundary dX is homeomorphic to the unit sphere in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space [19]. 0
0
ii) The group Z acts on dX by a -* a, where a(s) = n — a(s); an carries dX to itself, where the action is free. The quotient dX /Z is homeomorphic to an infinite dimensional real projective space, so its Z -Betti numbers B^dXa/Z^ ;Z ) = 1 for all / > 0. iii) The functional J is Z -invariant; an equivariant form of Proposition 3.4 is most likely available in this Z -equivariant context. In particular, 2
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
432 J. EELLS ind A. RATTO
24
9.
First Suspension and Dirichlet Problems Let u: S" -* S' be an eigenmap. We define its ellipsoidal suspension by +1
+,
Su:Q* (a,b)^Q' (c,d) (9-1) (a sin s • x + b cos s) -*(c sin <X(J) - w(x) + d cos a(s)) f
where x e S , 0 £ S £ T T , and a: [0, n] -* [0, JI] is any function such that *(0) = 0,
a(rt) = rr.
(9.2)
The reduced energy is now expressed by
Its Euler-Lagrange equation is just (2.10) with q = 0 = i ; i.e., B
* +
/cos t\. *'(«) . , P — - j; * + TiT \ sin h) k{et)
2
=
2
A c A„ ^ - ^ i sin a cos a. k (a) a* sur
9.4
£
The symmetry of the problem leads us to consider the following Dirichlet problem: Does equation (9.4) admit a solution a: (0, JI/2] -»(0, n/2] such that a{n/2) - n/2
and
lim a(s) = 0?
(9.5)
Geometrically, that means that we are investigating the existence of harmonic maps from the upper hemisphere of Q (a, b) to the upper hemisphere of Q'* (c, d}; any such map sends the equator of Q (a,b) into the equator of Q (c,d), in a prescribed homogeneous way which depends upon the eigenmap u. If a solution of type (9.5) is found, then the symmetry of equation (9.4) guarantees that reflection with respect to the equator yields a harmonic suspension as in (9.1), (9.2). Conversely, by using again the symmetry of (9.4), it is easy to see that any such harmonic suspension arises in this way. The variational approach of this paper applies to the Dirichlet problem (9.5): we limit ourselves to indicate the relevant modifications necessary to handle this case. We minimize the reduced energy J of (9.3) (with domain of integration restricted to [0, n/2]) on the closed convex set p+1
1
p+1
A"i = {a e X : a(n/2) = n/2
rlrl
and
0 < a(s) < n/2
for all
s e [0, n/2] }.
We observe that a s n/2 is the only constant critical point of J : X -»!R; the existence of solutions of type (9.5) is related to the stability of this constant solution with respect to variations $(s) e X such that n/2 + {(s) e X , , i.e., - n/2 < t;(s) <, 0 and {(n/2) = 0. t
433
HARMONIC MAPS B E T W E E N SPHERES A N D E L L I P S O I D S
25
More precisely, by results analogous to Proposition 3.4, Lemmata 3.6,4.2 and 4.11 we prove Proposition 9.6. [25] The Dirichlet problem (9.5) has a solution f a s unstable critical point of J :X ^tU.
n/2 is an
1
As an application of Proposition 9.6, with a = b = 1 in (9.1), we obtain the completion promised at the end of Sec. 7: r
Theorem 9.7. Let u : S" -* S be an eigenmap, p > 2. Then there is an equivariant harmonic suspension S u : S ->Q (c,d) iff p + 1
r+l
1
2
d /c <XJ{p-2).
(9.8)
Proof. By Proposition 9.6, we only have to study the stability of a = n/2. First assume (p - l ) > 4X c jd . A computation shows that Ding's variations of the type 2
2
2
v
£ = —sin" cos with
l/2[V
m=
1
2
2
l ) - 4X c /d u
- (p - 1)]
solve an eigenvalue problem as in (2.5) of [7], with eigenvalue 2
2
2
u = J(p-\) -4X c /d -p
+ 3.
H
As in [7], a s JT/2 is unstable iff u < 0; i.e., iff (9.8) holds. This proves existence for dilatations d/c such that 2
2
4XJ{p - I ) ^ d /c 2
2
< XJ(p - 2).
2
(9.9)
2
In the alternative case 0 < d /c < 4XJ{p - I) the theorem can be completed either by the study of the second variation at a s n/2 (as in Step 3 of Theorem 5.1, for instance); or, if p > 3, by a comparison argument which uses the solutions determined in (9.9). 2
2
Remark. Non-existence for d / c large was proved in [28] by a direct analysis of (9.4) using comparison arguments. In the spirit of Sec. 5, now we prove a result for maps between ellipsoids. Proposition 9.10.
Let u :S"-*S' a£ b
be an eigenmap, p > 1. Assume and
2
d /c
2
< XJ{p - 1).
Then there is an equivariant harmonic suspension +1
r+i
Su:Q> (a,b)^Q (c,d).
(9.11)
434
26
J.EELLSSDHA.RATTO
Proof.
By Proposition 9.6, it suffices to show that a = JI/2 is unstable.
We study the second variation at a = JT/2 for | = - c o s : by (2.11), with q = 0 = X„, we have,
Jo
L
i
"
i
fl sm-
J
By using a < h < b, we see that the integral in (9.12) is smaller than
Jo
]_a
asm'
J
J
0
|_
a
"If
-
').
But the term in parentheses is negative because of (9.11) and so the proposition is verified. Remark.
The argument of this Section can be applied to study Dirichlet problems
of type (9.5) for general equivariant metric: in particular, the domain can be the flat bal! and the results of [4] and [17] on the stability properties of the equator map can be used to determine whether the associated Dirichlet problem admits non-trivial solutions. Some examples in this direction have been indicated in [25]. 9.4.
Proposition 9.10 displays examples of Dirichlet problems for ellipsoidal domains
which have non-trivial solutions. In interesting contrast, we note the following fact: take any a, b, c, d>
p+l
0. If the boundary map carries the equator of Q {a,b)
to the
l
South Pole of Q'* (c, d), then there is not an equivariant harmonic extension to the p+l
upper hemisphere of Q (a,b)
+1
which covers the North pole of Q' (c,d);
this is an
application of Proposition 2.1 of [25]. That can also be deduced from [18].
References 1. P. Baird. Harmonic maps with symmetry, harmonic morphisms and deformations
of
metrics.
Research Notes in Math. No. 87, Pitman, 1983. 2. P. Baird and J. Eells, A conservation law for harmonic maps. Springer Lectures Notes 894 (1981) 1-25. 3
3
3. P. Baird and J. C. Wood, Bernstein theorems for harmonic morphisms from U. and S , Math.
Ann. 4. A. Baldes, Stability and uniqueness properties
of the equator map from a bail into an ellipsoid.
Math. Z. 185 (1984) 505-516. 5. K. C . Chang, Infinite Dimensional Morse Theory and its Applications,
6. 7. 8. 9.
22
ni
Sent. Math. Sup.
Montreal (1983). K. C. Chang and J. Eells, Unstable minimal surface coboundaries. Acta Math. Sinica 2 (1986) 233-247. W. Y. Ding, Symmetric harmonic map between spheres. Comm. Math. Phys, J. Eells and L. Lemaire, A report on harmonic map, Bui! London Math. Soc. 10 (!978) 1-68. J. Eells and L. Lemaire, Another report on harmonic maps. Bull London Math. Soc. 20(1988) 385-524.
435
H A R M O N I C MAPS B E T W E E N
SPHERES
A N DELLIPSOIDS
27
10. J. Eells and L. Lemaire, Deformation of Metrics and Associated Harmonic Maps, Patodi Mem. Vol., Tata Inst. (1981) 33-45. LI. J. Eells and L, Lemaire, Examples of harmonics maps from disks to hemispheres. Math. Z. 185(1984) 517-519. 12. J. Eells and J. H. Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, Am, J, Math, 86(1964) 109-160. 13. B. Fuglede, Harmonic morphisms between Riemannian manifolds, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 28 (1978) 107-144. 14. F. B. Fuller, Harmonic mappings, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, No. 40 (1954) 987-991. 15. M. Giaquinta and J. Soucek, Harmonic maps into a hemisphere, Ann. Sc. Norm. Sup. Pisa 12(1985)81-90. 16. P. Hartman, Ordinary Differential Equations, Wiley, (1964.) 17. W. Jager and H. Kau!, Rotationally symmetric harmonic maps from a ball into a sphere and the regularity problem for weak solutions of elliptic systems, J. Reine Angew. Math. 343(1983) 146-161. 18. H. Karcher and J. C. Wood, Non-existence results and growth properties for harmonic maps and forms, J. Reine und Angew. Math. 353 (1984) 165-180. 19. V. L. Klee, Convex bodies and periodic homeomorphisms in Hilbert spaces. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 74(1953) 10-43. 20. V. Pettinati and A. Ratto, Existence and non-existence results for harmonic maps between spheres, Ann. Sc. Norm. Sup. Pisa. 21. A. Ratto, Construction d'applications harmoniques de spheres euclidiennes, C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris 304 (1987) 185-186. 1
22. A. Ratto, On harmonic maps from S to S* of prescribed Hopf invariant. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 104 (1988) 273-276. 23. A. Ratto, Harmonic mapsfromdeformed spheres to spheres. Am. J. Math. 111(1989)225-238. 24. A. Ratto, Harmon ic maps of spheres and the Hopf construction. Topology 28(1989) 379-388. 25. A. Ratto, On the Dirichlet problem for harmonic maps into spheres or ellipsoids and equivariant harmonic mapsfromwarped products. Bull Soc. Math. Beigique 41 (1989) 2, SER. B, 145-168. 26. R. Schoen and K. Uhlenbeck, Regularity of minimizing harmonic maps into the sphere, Inv. Math. 78 (1984) 89-100. 27. R. T. Smith, Harmonic mappings of spheres, Warwick Thesis (1972). 28. R. T. Smith, Harmonic mapping of spheres. Am. J. Math. 97 (1975) 364-385. 29. M. Struwe, On a critical point theory for minimal surfaces spanning a wire in tt", J. Reine Angew. Math. 349 (1984) 1-23.
436
ON REPRESENTING HOMOTOPY CLASSES BY HARMONIC MAPS J. E E L L S AND M . J- F E R R E I R A
and
Lei (M,g) and (N,fs) be compact smooth ( = C" or C") Riemannian manifolds, a homotopy class of smooth maps M -*N.
THEOREM. Suppose m = dim M ^ 3. Then there is a smooth metric g conformaliy equivalent to g, and a map tpe.1t" such that tj>:(\f,g)->(N,h) is harmonic. That is, ^ is a smooth extremum of the energy functional
the vertical bars denote the HiIbert-Schmidt norm with respect to g, h; and v is the volume element of (M,g). Here is the startlingly simple proof of the Theorem. s
Step 1.
For any real number p > 2m, consider the functional
whose Euler-Lagrange equation is i
i,/
d i v ( ( l + | d « J | ) " ' - V 0 ) = O.
(2)
v
The extrema of F :& (M,N) -> R are smooth solutions of (2). Every component af J??(M,N) contains an absolute minimum of F . p
v
Both these properties are standard (for example, see [7] for entirely different applications, with m = 2): (a) A weak solution
P,1
Received 20 July 1990; revised 14 September 199(1 1980 Mathematics Subject Claaificalion 58E20. This work was done during ihe Warwick Symposium on Partial Differential Equations and Geomelry, supported by Ihe SERC. Bull. London Math. Soc. 23 (1991) 160 162
437
ON
REPRESENTING
HOMOTOPY
CLASSES B Y HARMONIC
MAPS
161
(d) That /^achieves its minimum in every component af&^M, N) follows from its weak lower semicontinuity; or from the Palais-Smale condition. Step 2.
Write g = p ""-"g for a smooth positive function / : .1/ -* U. Then
and the Euler-Lagrange operator of (1) is n*V;|vA) = f ' " - ' [ t t v : jr. h) + d -V l o g / ] - P" v
div (/dy). m
(31 :)
In the spirit of [5. §14] we find that the harmonic maps tp:{M.f-" -' g) — {N.h)
are the solutions of div (fdc>) ™ 0. Step 3.
5
For any extremum £ s j f of/;, we s e t / = (1 + l ^ l ) " l
2 1 2
and
2l
g = (\ + \dcin^ -"- g.
t
4)
Then applying Step 2 to (21. we conclude that tp:(M.g) — {N.h) is harmonic. REMARK. Steps 2 and 3 show that a wide variety of uniformly elliptic systems could have been used in the proof, in place of (2), and that the argument can be adapted to many functional other than ( I ) . REMARK. I f HI = 2. ihe situation is radically different. First, the energy functional (1)—and hence harmonicity—is now a conformal invariant of the metric on M. Secondly, there are homotopy classes Jf' of maps containing no harmonic representatives, whatever the metrics g.h [3, 2]. REMARK. Our Theorem gives a positive—and geometrically satisfying—solution to Leniaire's rendering problem, except in the case in ~ 2 [4. § 13]. In [I] and [8], various homotopy classes of maps of spheres to spheres and projective spaces have been rendered hannonic by conformal deformations of the Euclidean metric of the domain. REMARK. Suppose that SI has a smooth boundary 3,1/ and that ip:c.M -* .V is a map extensible to a smooth map M — .V; let Jf denote a component in the space of such extensions. The Theorem and Remarks are valid in that context, as well. v
References
L P
BAIRD
and A R A T T O . ' Conservation laws, equivariant hannonic maps and harmonic morphisms'. preprint, Universitv of Warw ick. 1990. 2. J. E E L L S and L LEMAIRE. On (he construction of harmonic and holomorphic maps between surfaces'. 3. J.
EELLS
Math. Am. and
2S2 (1980)
27-Mi
C. W O O D , 'Restrictions on harmonic maps of surfaces'. Topology 15 (I9~fi) 263-266, 4. L. LEMAIRE. 'Applications harmoniques de surfaces riemanniennes , / Diff- Geom 13 119781 51-78. 5. A. LtCHNEROvvicz. 'Applications liamioniques ei varietes kahleriennes'. Svmpar. Math. ? (1970) I.
341 -402.
6. C. B. Mtixitcv. Multiple integrals in the calculus OJ'i'ariaiions, Grundlehren I .'0 (Springer. Berlin. 196M. 7. J. S A C K S and K U H L E N B E C K . 'The existence of minimal immersions of 2-spheres'. Ana. of.Walk, I [ 3
iwsn i :•*
438 162 8.
J. EELLS AND M. J . FERREIRA 1
and D . - G . Y A N G . 'On harmonic maps from conformal S "*' to CP"', preprint. University of Chicago, 1989.
J.-P. SHA
Mathematics Institute University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL and I.C.T.P. Strada Costiera, 11 34100 Trieste Italy
Departamento de Matematicas Facultad Ciencias Universidad de Lisboa Rua Ernesto de Vasconcelos, Ed. C2 1700 Lisboa Portugal