This book had its origins in "Thermal-Mechanical Modelling of the Flat Rolling Process", by Pietrzyk and Lenard, Springer-Verlag, 1991. The advances in modeling and computing ability allowed the improvement of the models in the 1991 manuscript. The objective was to explore the possibilities of producing steels with pre-determined attributes, called designer steels. Writing would have been impossible without the help of colleagues, co-workers, students and funding agencies. The authors wish to thank NATO, for funding "Microstructure Control During Hot Strip Rolling", Collaborative Research Grants Programme, CRG 930112. J.G.Lenard is grateful for the financial assistance received from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Manufacturing Research Corporation of Ontario, Imperial Oil, Dofasco Inc. and Alcan International. The research studies of Drs. P. Munther, J. Biglou, S. Zhang, A. Karagiozis and Y-J Hwu in addition to the work of B. Hum and H. Calquhoun were invaluable and no publication could have resulted without their contributions. M. Pietrzyk is grateful for the assistance received from KEN (Polish Committee for Scientific Research), British Council, and the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Fund. Thanks are also due to Drs. M. Glowacki, Z. Kedzierski, J. Kusiak, R. Kuziak, J. Majta and Z. Malinowski. L. Cser wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Mr. L. Arvai and Dr. K. Farkas. Thanks are due to Dr Pekka Mantyla of Rautaruukki Steel and Prof Antti Korhonen of Helsinki University of Technology for their helpfiil advice. The patience and the assistance of our families must be mentioned. These include Harriet and Patti; Alina, Marta and Wojtek and Lengyel Veronika, Adrienn and Adam. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. is acknowledged for permission to reproduce Figs 4.6, 4.9, 4.12 and 4.14 from "Friction and Wear of Materials", 2°** edition, by E. Rabinowicz. The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan is acknowledged for permission to reproduce Figs 2, 3 and 4 of "Thermo-mechanical Treatment of a High Nb - High V Bearing Microalloyed Steel, 1995, by Tajima and Lenard. Permission to reproduce Figs 3, 4, 5, 10, 12, and 13 from "Modelling the Thermomechanical and Microstructural Evolution During Rolling of a Nb HSLA Steel", by Pietrzyk, Roucoules and Hodgson, ISIJ, 1995, is acknowledged. R. Wusatowski is thanked for permission to reproduce Figs 3.56, 3.57, 3.58 and 3.59fi-omZ. Wusatowski's "Fundamentals of Rolling". The CRC Press is acknowledged for permission to reproduce Tables 3 and 13 from Booser: "Handbook of Lubrication", 2"'' edition. Dr. J. Bartecek is thanked for permission to reproduce Table 3 of "Heat Exchange Between the Workpiece and the Tool in Metal Forming Processes", by Pietrzyk et al. McGraw-Hill is acknowledged for permission to reproduce Figure 4-24 of the text by Schey, "Introduction to Manufacturing Processes", 2"*^ edition. The Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity is thanked for permission to reproduce Fig. 2 of "A Mathematical Model of Cold Rolling - Experimental Substantiation" by Roychoudhury and Lenard. MUNKSGAARD International Publishers Ltd. is acknowledged for permission to reproduce Fig. 5 of "Tribology in Metalforming", by Lenard, in Scand. J. of Metall., 1998, vol. 26, Supplement 1. Springer-Verlag is acknowledged for permission to reproduce Fig. 1.1 of "Thermal-mechanical Modelling of the Flat Rolling Process" by Pietrzyk and Lenard. Profs
VI D.RJ. Owen, E. Onate and E. Hinton are thanked for permission to reproduce Figs 10 and 11 of "Application of the Finite Element Technique to the Interpretation of the Plane Strain Compression Test", by Pietrzyk and Tibballs, Proc. COMPLAS 4. Profs J. Huetink and F.P.T. Baaijens are thanked for permission to reproduce Figs 1 - 7 of "Inverse Analysis Applied to the Evaluation of Rheological and Microstructutral Parameters in Hot Forming of Steels", by Pietrzyk, et al., published in the Proc. NUMIFORM'98. Prof J.H. Beynon and the other editors of the Proc. of the 2"^ Conf on Modelling of Metal Rolling Processes are thanked for permission to reproduce Figs 1 and 10 of "Validation of Finite-Element Models for Asymmetric Rolling", by Pietrzyk, et al. The authors are grateful to Hitachi Review for permission to reproduce Fig. 2 of "New Control Techniques for Cold Rolling Mills" by Hishikawa et al, 1990 and to JSME International for Figs 4 and 5 of "The Development of a Die Sensor" by Yoneyama and Hatamura, 1987. Publisher SIGMA is thanked for permission to reproduce Fig. 9 of "Model profilu blach grubych, przystosowany do systemu sterowania on-line w walcowni blach grubych", Dyja et al., Hutnik, 1998. Publisher AKAPIT is acknowledged for permission to reproduce Figs 4 - 1 1 from the paper by Pietrzyk, et al, "Wykorzystanie komputerowej symulacji do oceny wrazliwosci mikrostruktury i wlasnosci blach na zmiany parametrow technologicznych procesu walcowania na goraco", Proc. KomPlasTech'98. WYDAWNICTWA AGH is thanked for permission to reproduce Fig. 1 of'TSlumerical Aspects of the Simulation of Hot Metal Forming Using Internal Variable Method", by Pietrzyk, Metall Foundry Eng., 1998. Thanks are due to A.A. Balkema for permission to reproduce figures from "Dislocation model for work hardening and recrystallization appUed to the finite-element simulation of hot forming", Pietrzyk, et al, and from "Application of FE simulation of the compression test to the evaluation of constitutive equation for steels at elevated temperatures", Kusiak, et al., both appearing in Simulation of Materials Processing: Theory, Methods and Applications", eds Shen and Dawson. The permission to reproduce figures from the Journal of Materials Processing Technology, received from Elsevier must mentioned. These include the work of Hum, B., Colquhoun, H.W. and Lenard, J.G., 1996, "Measurement? of Friction During Hot Rolling of Aluminum Alloys", J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 60, 331-338; Karagiozis, AN. and Lenard, J.G., 1985, "The Effect of Material Properties on the Coefficient of Friction in Cold Rolling", Proc. Eurotrib'95, Lyon, 17; Zhang, S. and Lenard, J.G., 1996, "Reduction of the Roll Force during Lubricated Cold Rolling of Aluminum Strips", J. Synthetic Lubrication, 12, 303-321; and Lenard, J.G. and Zhang, S., 1997, "A Study of Friction During Lubricated Cold Rolling of an Aluminum Alloy", J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 72, 293-301. Thanks are due for permission to reproduce Figs 2 - 10, from the paper by Majta, et al "A study of the effect of the thermomechanlcal history on the mechanical properties of a high niobium steel". Mat. Sc. & Eng., 1996. The University of Miskolc is thanked for permission to reproduce figures from "Investigation of parameters influencing the accuracy of artificial neural networks in modelling stress-strain curves", Farkas and Arvai. Prof Korhonen is thanked for permission to reproduce figures from the Ph.D. dissertation of P. Myllykoski and from "Application of neural networks in rolling of steel", by Larkiola and Korhonen, Proc. IPMM Conf, 1997. DOFASCO Inc. is thanked for the photograph of their strip mill, pictured on thefrontcover. The expert help in the preparation of the manuscript of Ms. Barbara Krzemien-Kotula and Ms. Halina Kusiak is gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks are extended to Ms. Patti Lenard for the excellent job of proofreading. h4A THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
Chapter 1 Introduction The contribution of manufacturing to the gross national product in an industrialized country is a good, albeit not exclusive, indication of its rank among the developed or developing nations. Schey shows some interesting information in his text Introduction to Manufacturing Processes, 2"** ed. (Schey, 1987) by plotting the contribution of manufacturing to the GNP as a fimction of the gross national product per capita. The figure indicates Germany as the leader, followed by Switzeriand and Japan, Italy, France and the USA. The Canadian contribution, in 1982, was near 20%. At the low end of the scale arp the developing nations, including Bangladesh, Zaire and Ethiopia. Using data from the Worid Development Report 1997, published by the Worid Bank (1997), the situation in 1995 is indicated in Figure 1.1. Singapore and China have become major manufacturing nations. As well, Japan has the highest gross domestic product (GDP) per capita income of all nations. At the lower end, developing countries indicate fairly low contributionfi-ommanufacturing to their GDP.
100000 -
Japan US • Germany • • . Singapore Italy Canada Hungary Mexico • Poland
Hong Kong •
"2
10000-
8 Q 0
1000^
. 100^
Tu'rkey*
• ^^^sia
Pakistan • P^"*PP'"^^ . Bangladesh * • China India •
•
Ethiopia 10-
\—
^
^
0 10 20 30 40 contribution of manufacturing to the GDP {%)
Figure 1.1 The contribution of manufacturing to the GDP, 1995 In this chapter, the steel industry, a major contributor to the wealth, is discussed in terms of its capabilities and production. Data concerning raw steel capacity and raw steel production are included and discussed. The current concerns of the major steel producers are mentioned. These include the protection of the environment, competition from minimills, upgrading the
quality of the product by improving the adaptive control systems, introducing tool steel rolls to reduce roll wear and investigating the possibilities of direct casting and rolling thin strips. In the words of the former Director of Research of The Steel Company of Canada, Mr. J.C. McKay (1988) ..."there is no material like steel". Its strength, ductility and formability are unmatched by others and Mr. McKay did not think that the competition from aluminum or ceramics is to be taken as a threat at the present time. While the last comment is arguable, it is true that as of now, the formability of aluminum does not approach that of steel, nor does the ductility of ceramics.
1.1
STEEL PRODUCTION
It is of some interest to examine the international situation in terms of raw steel production by steel grade, method of casting and amounts of production. These data are shown in Figures 1.2 and 1.3, giving the total amount of steel production by selected countries and the breakdown by type and method of casting. 1 UULf UUU -
(0
c
5
100000 c
•R
^ii^ ^ N ^ _ _ ^ _ ^ _ ^
3
1
10000-
1000-
]
+ US o Canada a Western Europe V Hungary A Eastern Europe X FonnerUSSR I
Q.
1
• World
i
1
r—
1992
^ 1996
, 2000
year
Figure 1.2 Production of raw steel in the world
It is quite apparent that while total steel production has been declining during the last five years, this decline was limited to approximately 6%. Minor increases are observable in the amount of steel produced in North America and in Western Europe. There is a very serious drop in the steel production data of the former USSR; from a high of 170 million tons in 1990 to 86 million tons in 1994. Surprisingly, this drop was not filled in by the steel companies of the West. Hungary's steel production showed a drop from 1990 when the total was 3.2 million tons, to a low of 1.9 million tons in 1993. There is a marginal increase evident in 1994, to 2.1 million tons. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA JION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
The breakdown of the production data indicates several changes in the way steel is produced. Figure 1.3 shows some of the trends, presenting information on the types of steel produced and the favoured method of preparing the slabs for hot rolling. The data refers to steel production in the United States only.
100000
I
o ts g.
80000 60000 + o a A V
40000
1 I
Carbon Steel Alloy Steel Stainless Steel Ingots Con. Cast
20000 -I a a a a a a a - g 1984
1988
1992 year
1996
2000
Figure 1.3 Raw steel production by steel type and by billet preparation
There was significant evidence up to the middle of the 1980s that industrialized nations produced and rolled less carbon steels and more alloy steels, reflecting a concentration on the value added product of the higher priced steels. At the same time, less developed nations were increasing their share of the carbon steel markets but did not have the technology necessary to produce the steels requiring careful thermal-mechanical treatment, or in other words, controlled rolling. Figure 1.3 above shows a deviationfi-omthis trend. The amount of carbon steel produced has been growing over the last few years, while the amounts of alloy and stainless steels produced have not changed in a very significant manner. The data do not show the current concerns of customers, however. Among the carbon steels, two new types are involved: the coated steels, especially galvanized steels, which reduce the effects of corrosion, produced for the automotive market, and the extra low carbon steels, containing 0.002 0.004% C, necessitating rolling in the two-phase or the ferrite temperature ranges. Both of these steel types need the extra skill and technology possessed by the companies of the industrialized nations. As well, the method of producing billets has changed drastically. In 1985 almost 50 million tons of steel were prepared from ingots and about 40 million tons by continuous casting. In 1994, the situation is reversed and continuous casting is used in almost 95% of production, indicating the cost saving introduced by the technology change. As mentioned above, the
INTRODUCTION
information in Figure 1.3 refers to the United States only. It may be assumed with some assurance, however, that the trends are universal.
1.2
FUTURE CHANGES IN PERSONNEL
The Canadian Steel Trade and Employment Congress is a joint initiative of the United Steelworkers of America and Canada's steel companies. In a recent brochure (Steel in Our Future, 1995) the Congress stated its views on the future of steel in North America, referring to the United States, Canada and Mexico. The brochure discusses the changing face of the steel trade. It comments on the "customerdriven" and "environmentally-conscious" technologies one must use. As well, while the basic ideas of steel making and steel producing have not changed, the details of the processes have. The people and the products are vastly different. A direct quotation from the brochure is especially interesting: *'By 1980, you needed a high school education to get a job in the mill. As we approach the year 2000, you will require a post-secondary education *\ In the opinion of the authors and considering the introduction of high technology in the steel industry and the requirement for increasing the value-added component of the product, the statement may be applied universally. The recent cover story in The Economist (The Economist, 1998) also indicates that the nature of manufacturing has changed and now demands highly qualified workers, able to deal with the increased complexities of production.
1.3
COMPETITION FROM OTHER MATERIALS
Steel competes with aluminum, plastics, composites and ceramics and this competition is the fiercest in the automotive industry as over the last decade the pressure for increased fuel economy resulted in the need for lighter weight cars. The competition is not over as the pressure for even lower fiiel consumption has not abated. While there was a considerable change in the amount of steel and iron used in vehicles in favor of the alternatives, there is some evidence that in the recent past, steel has been enjoying increased use. Steel's ease in manufacturability, advances in optimizing techniques and complete recyclability are the reasons for this comeback (Driving Your Future, 1995). Some examples indicate the trend. While the original design for the 1996 Sable and Taurus included an aluminum hood and fender, the cars were introduced into the market with steel for those parts. The roof of the 1996 Saturn is made of steel instead of a combination of steel and plastic. The rear subframe of the 1997 Corvette is manufactured from hydroformed steel tubing, instead of aluminum extrusions. Some of these facts are illustrated in Figure 1.4. It is apparent that while steel usage has increased, the amount of the other materials has remained largely unchanged. The efforts in the aluminum industry, toward making aluminum competitive with steel, are not to be underestimated. Considerable research is being devoted to studies of the formability MA THEMA JJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
of aluminum sheets. The work considers, among others, the process of forming, the tribology problems at the die/metal interface, the development of new alloys in addition to a constant search for improved productivity. The steel engineers are, of course, aware of the necessary trends toward lighter weight vehicles, as evidenced by the development of the ultra light weight car frame whose performance has exceeded the original specifications. 2000.0
1600.0 -
I
r
tt) 1200.0 TO
E "o ^ c
+ 0 D A
800.0 •
Steel 1 Iron Aluminium Plastics
a 400.0 H 0.0-1 1980
:g=a^ ^
\ 1984
^
\ 1988 year
•
r 1992
Figure 1.4 Competition from other materials
1.4
CURRENT CONCERNS
Minimills: Dominance of the integrated steel producers is increasingly challenged by the minimills with lower costs of production. Minimill technology emerged in the 1970s, originally used for the production of specialty steels. The small mills have expanded their operations to produce carbon steels in a very short time period. The cost reduction was obtained mostly from producing liquid steel from scrap, using an electric furnace, lowering capital costs per ton of annual steelmaking capacity to one third that of a new integrated mill. Initially, minimills produced no more than half a million tons per year. This amount increased fast, however, and many of them now produce over one million tons. Protection of the environment: The need for the protection of the environment is realized by steel producers and environmental management is now an integral part of plant management at all modem steel mills. Recycling is built into the steelmaking process. Examples of environmental innovations include several processes. The development of pulverized coal injection reduces the need for coke. This process is expected to replace about 15% of coal consumption by the year 2000. Electric arc furnace technologies, including new direct current furnaces, which consume about 350 kWh per ton, compared to 500 kWh per ton of the older models, will reduce energy consumption, which in INTRODUCTION
turn will reduce pollution. Waste recycling is, of course, also used in the plants. Finally, steel is acknowledged as the most recycled material. Cost reduction: Mr. R. Ackert (Algoma Steel Corp., Sault Ste. Marie, Canada, private communication, 1994) indicated that the current trend in the industry is toward cost reduction by eliminating non-essential process steps, many of which are energy intensive. He also identified problems associated with direct rolling, eliminating the reheating process. As examples, he mentioned the NUCOR plants, the SMS technology and the efforts of Voest Alpine. Further, the post-roUmg heat treatment may also be eliminated by careful planning of the thermo-mechanical process during rolling and accelerated cooling. Quality improvements: In order to address the demands of customers for increased quality of the product, new control systems are being planned. These include the possibility of introducing some elements of artificial intelligence m the adaptive control schemes of hot strip mills and cold rolling mills. Tool steel rolls: Roll wear costs are about 10% of the cost of steel production. Introducing tool steels for the work rolls of hot strip mills appears to reduce roll wear by a substantial amount. Direct casting and rolling: The Projet Bessemer, located in Boucherville, Quebec, deals with the possibility of minimizing the rolling process during the production of thin strips, directly usable for fiirther cold rolling. The prototype mill, now in operation, can produce thickness as low as 2 millimeters. One rolling stand is located downstream fi-om the tundish. The aim is to refine the technology such that the mechanical, metallurgical and geometrical quality of the direct cast and rolled strip is as good or better than the one obtained by the present techniques. The mill is operated by a consortium of Canadian steel companies. The possibility of dynamic reaystaUizaiion during strip rolling: In continuous rod and bar rolling processes, extremely high strain rates (100-1000 s'*) and short ihterpass times (between few tens of milliseconds to few hundreds of milliseconds) are bang employed. Typical strains per pass (0.4-0.6) are lower than the critical strain for the onset of dynamic recrystallization at high strain rates. However, due to the very short interpass times, there is not enou^ time for complete static recrystallization of deformed austenite at rolling temperatures, especially in microalloyed steels. Consequently, the strain is retained to the next pass and this strain accumulation may exceed the level of the critical strain. In this case, dynamic recrystallization may occur during rolling, and wiU be followed by metadynamic recrystallization. Until recently, it was generally accepted that in plate and strip rolling with longer interpass times, there is no possibility of pass to pass strain accumulation, which is required for the initiation of dynamic recrystallization. The retarding effects of microalloying elements on the recrystallization kkietics are well known. Recently, it has been proposed that under appropriate conditions (low temperatures, high strains per pass and some limited precipitation), it is possible to accumulate large enough strains to initiate dynamic recrystallization during strip rolling of niobium microaUoyed steels. The possibility of the occurrence of dynamic recrystallization during strip roUmg has major industrial implications. Ignoring the possibility of dynamic recrystallization during strip rolling may lead to errors in roll force predictions. For nearly all practical deformation conditions at moderate to high strain rates, dynamic recrystallization is expected to produce significant grain refinement resulting in monotonic stress-strain curves. Another advantage is a reduction in rolling loads.
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
1.5
THE ROLLING PROCESS
In what follows, the rolling process will be discussed in terms of hot and cold rolling of flat products. The concept of the process is simple and well known. Strips or plates are passed through two hardened steel cylinders, rotating in opposite directions. During the pass the thickness of the work piece is reduced, its length is increased while its width remains largely unchanged. The usual practice is to roll first at high temperatures, followed by cold rolling. The billets have been prepared by the continuous casting process. They are reheated in the soaking pits and are hot rolled next, in hot strip mills. The layers of scale are removed by pickling and further reductions are obtained by cold rolling. One of the traditional aims of hot rolling is to reduce the size of slab at as high a temperature as possible, thereby reducing the mill loads and increasing the tonnage. During the past 40 years, the technologies of process control have been widely developed in order to satisfy the demand for highly accurate dimensions, for closely controlled mechanical/physical properties and for high productivity. For a modem hot strip mill, process control is fiilly computerized, so the properties of the final product may be precisely controlled. The objectives of subsequent cold rolling include the production of sheets possessing high quality surfaces and accurate and consistent dimensions in addition to high speeds, required by the increasing demands for high rates of production.
L5.1 The hot rolling process A schematic diagram of a hot strip mill is depicted in Figure 1.5.
Descaler^i?!^''"^'^
Reheating Furnaces
Pyrometers
p°nnn
^ ^ Transfer ^^^^^ Table Roughing ^[y'^g Mill Shear
U
^
i I M I li I r I M i l l U
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sy
Runout Table > & Finishing Mill Cooling Banks Coiler ^_pgy V
^
Figure 1.5 A schematic diagram of a hot strip mill (Hwu, 1995)
There are five major parts in the hot strip rolling process. They are: •
Reheating: The slab is heated up to 1200~1250°C in a fiimace to remove the cast dendrite structures and dissolve most of the alloying elements.
INTRODUCTION
•
•
• •
1.5.2
Rough rolling: Before rolling, the scale is removed by a high pressure water spray in the descaling box. The slab is rolled in the roughing stands. The thickness of the slab is reduced from approximately 270 mm to about 50 mm. The width is controlled by edge rolling. At the end of rough rolling, the strip is sent to the finishing mill along the transfer table. Finish rolling: The finishing mill is composed of five to seven tandem stands. The strip is continuously rolled in the finishing mill. At the entry to the finishing mill, the temperature of the strip is measured and at the exit, both temperature and thickness are measured. The Automatic Gauge Control (AGC) system uses the feedback signal from the gauge meter to control the exit thickness of the strip. The finishing temperature is controlled by changing the rolling speed. Cooling: After rolling, the strip is cooled by a water curtain on the runout table. Coiling: At the exit of the runout table, the temperature of the strip is measured and the strip is coiled by the coiler. The cold rolling process
The layer of scales are removed from the surfaces of the strips and fiirther reduction of the thickness is produced by cold rolling.
tension reel
roiling mill
uncoiier
Figure 1.6 A schematic diagram of a modem cold rolling mill for aluminum (Hishikawa et al., 1990, reproduced with permission) MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
A large variation of configurations are possible in this process. An example of a modem cold rolling mill, for aluminum, is shown in Figure 1.6. The mill is six-high; having two small diameter work rolls of 470 mm diameter and two sets of backup rolls. The diameter of the intermediate backup roll is 510 mm and the third backup roll is of 1300 mm diameter. The mill is capable of producing strips of 0.08 mm thickness at speeds up to 1800 meters per minute.
1.6 IMPROVEMENTS OF THE ROLLING PROCESS The process of rolling has been around for some time and it is well known. The basic ideas have not changed; the thickness of a piece of metal is reduced while its length is increased. The possibilities of improvements are to be considered in terms of the mechanical, metallurgical and geometrical attributes on the product, by increasing its value-added product. This implies that the control of the process must be enhanced. This is possible by examining the components of the rolling system and devising ways of changing them to reach the desired improvements. Providing the information necessary for those improvements is the objective of this book. Realizing that control of the rolling process relies on mathematical and physical simulation, these form the major focus of the study. The components are reviewed, discussed and applied to various forms of the process. Mathematical predictions are made, always with a parallel set of measurements. The conclusions regarding the ability of a model to predict the variables are arrived at only after successful comparisons.
1.7
THE CONTENTS OF THE BOOK
There are ten chapters in this book. In the present chapter, Introduction, the economics of steel making and the rolling of flat products, both hot and cold, are considered. The argument is made that improvements of product quality and productivity are necessary to maintain competitiveness. In a process, such as flat rolling, in which the basic idea has not changed for a considerable time, successful improvements require a very complete, thorough understanding of the physics and the mechanics of the phenomena. This is possible through physical and mathematical modeling and that is the major concern of the book. The topics of the following chapters are concerned with the components that are needed in building up a physical or a mathematical model of the rolling process. In each case, mathematical modeling and the substantiation of the predictions of the model are presented in parallel. Tribology, including friction, lubrication, heat transfer and wear, is discussed in Chapter 2. A brief introduction to the basic ideas of friction is first. This is followed by a presentation of the background necessary for an understanding of the principles of lubrication, including the thickness of lubricant films, the various lubricating regimes, and the effect of lubrication on the mill loads. A look at the effects of heat transfer on the rolling process is next. The last topic, before Case Studies, is the wear of work rolls. In the Case Studies, recent experimental resuhs, concerning tribological problems, are reviewed. These include measurements of frictional and heat transfer coefficients and the ability of oils to lower the forces and torques on the mill. The resistance of the material to deformation is treated in Chapter 3. The methods and the difficulties in obtaining true stress-true strain curves, under isothermal conditions, at constant, INTRODUCTION
22 true strain rates, are described. The types of mathematical models, applicable to represent the constitutive behavior of the metals, at high and at low temperatures, are shown. Specific examples of stress-strain curves are demonstrated in the Case Studies. The boundary conditions, connected with tribology, and the initial conditions, connected with the material's flow strength, are put to use in Chapter 4, dealing with modeling the rolling process. An empirical model and several one-dimensional models are presented, all of which are designed to calculate one or more of the rolling parameters: the roll separating force, the roll torque, the roll pressure, the power, the temperature rise and the forward slip The detailed derivations are not given, instead, the readers are asked to consult the appropriate references. The sensitivity of the predictions of the models to various parameters is considered. The chapter closes with an examination of the predictive capabilities of the models, applicable for both hot and cold rolling. Thefinite-elementmodel is analyzed next, in Chapter 5, as appHed to the flat rolling process. The basic ideas of the finite-element approach are described and are applied to several examples. Rigid-plastic and elastic-plastic formulations are considered. Symmetric and non-symmetric rolling are examined. The possibilities of modeling the microstructural phenomena during hot forming and subsequent cooling are reviewed in Chapter 6. The critical temperatures are listed and discussed. The metallurgical events, such as the hardening and restoration mechanisms, are presented. The models developed by others and by the present writers are given next. The predictions of the models are compared to experimental results as well as information, obtained fi-om industry. Shape rolling is described in Chapter 7. The usual method to deal with the threedimensional aspects of shape rolling is to use three-dimensional models. The disadvantages of this approach include the long computing times and the large memory requirements. An alternative technique is introduced, in which the two-dimensional FE approach can be used to calculate the three-dimensional distribution of the variables. The calculations are coupled with the relations, describing the evolution of the microstructure, and the predictions are compared to data, developed under closely controlled circumstances. One-dimensional models and their predictive abilities are also given in the chapter. The inverse method, designed to take advantage of the non-homogeneous nature of plastic deformation, is presented in Chapter 8. The method is applied to determine the behavior of metals, subjected to large plastic flow. Knowledge based modeling, including the use of artificial intelligence, expert systems, fiizzy sets and logic and neural networks, is an exciting approach to analyze the rolling process. The possibilities are given in Chapter 9, starting with several definitions of terms, not commonly used in engineering. Acquisition of knowledge and its storage are considered. Data mining and the use of self organizing maps in the hot rolling process are demonstrated. In the case studies, the use of these techniques is discussed and applied to several problems associated with the rolling process. Afi-amework, to allow the use of neural networks in the prediction of the grain size in hot rolling, is the first example. This is followed by the application of neural networks to the prediction of constitutive behavior of steels and aluminum and to the prediction of the roll separating force during hot rolling of strips of the two alloys. Conclusions are listed in Chapter 10. These are given chapter by chapter, recapitulating the major points in each. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
n Chapter 2 Tribology of Flat Rolling and the Boundary Conditions Tribology is defined as the study of contacting surfaces in relative motion. In metal forming, these surfaces refer to the contact between the workpiece and the forming die and in the present context of flat rolling the contacting surfaces involve the work roll and the rolled metal. Traditionally, tribology has been taken to be concerned with fiiction, lubrication and wear. The transfer of heat at the contacting surfaces must also be included in the phenomena, since it is the transfer of forces aw^heat at the surfaces of contact that contributes to fiictional resistance, creates wear of the rolls and hence, causes surface damage to the rolled product. During flat rolling, the transfer of forces at the roll/workpiece interface is accomplished by the normal stresses and by the shear stresses. It is the usual practice to define the average, over the roll gap, of their ratio as the coefficient of fiiction. The transfer of heat is described most conveniently in terms of the proportionality of the heat flux to the diflference of the average temperatures of the contacting surfaces, with the factor of proportionality defined as the heat transfer coefficient. Knowledge of the manner of the dependence of these coefficients on process and material parameters is necessary for successfiil process and product design. As well, accurate and consistent modeling - both predictive and adaptive - of the phenomena in the roll gap and the boundary conditions of the deformation zone in flat rolling requires the same information. Understanding the dependence of// and a on the parameters would lead to an appreciation of their attendant influence on roll wear, reported to cost as much as 10% of total processing costs. Further, product surface quality, of prime concern to customers, and because of that, to the engineers of the steel industry, would be improved. As written by Roberts (1997): *'Ofall the variables associated with rolling, none is more important than friction in the roll bite. Friction in rolling, as in many other mechanical processes can be a best friend or a mortal enemy, and its control within an optimum range for each process is essential. " While Roberts wrote about fiiction in the roll bite, it is appropriate to suggest a change to his quote and replace the term "fiiction" with "tribology", including all its four components fiiction, lubrication, heat transfer and wear. These concerns are currently of special significance as the traditional cast iron and high Cr rolls are being replaced by tool steel rolls in hot strip mills, making the study of tribology an important research priority. The first objective of this chapter is to present a brief discussion of the essential components of tribology as a "tribological system" and the adhesion hypothesis, as applied to metal forming and especially to flat rolling of metals. This discussion is followed by a compilation and review of the background and recent technical literature on fiiction, lubrication, heat
^12
^
,
transfer and roll wear, in terms of the effects of the important parameters on the roll forces, the roll torques, the forward slip and the coefficients of friction and heat transfer. Experimental techniques used to determine them are given. Published values of the coefficients of friction and heat transfer are also shown, indicating the difficulties in measurements, contradictions and the missing information. Results of flat rolling experiments using aluminum and steel strips are then presented, with the reduction per pass, the temperature, the rolling speed and the lubricant and its additives chosen as the process parameters. While some of the case studies deal with cold rolling, the information presented and the trends observed are helpful when dealing with high temperature phenomena. As pointed out by reseeirchers, data on friction, obtained using a bench machine, have not been found to correlate well with industrial experience. The authors agree with this observation and are convinced that the statement is equally valid for all aspects of tribology. In the experimental work reported below, two laboratory scale rolling mills were employed. As far as possible, the process parameters were chosen to be close to industrial conditions.
2.1
THE TRTOOLOGICAL SYSTEM
Several researchers define the "tribological system" in terms of the process and material parameters. Since both coefficients of heat transfer and fiiction depend on surface interactions, both are affected by essentially the same set of parameters. Perhaps the best definition of a tribological system is given by Schey (1983), who identified the components and the parameters of the system and indicated their interactions in an easy-to-read flowchart. In the rolling process the three components are the work roll, the lubricant and the workpiece, which is the rolled strip. The parameters, which are listed for the die, the lubricant, the workpiece and the process, operate together to create the final product. Three regimes of lubrication are also identified. These are the boundary, hydrodynamic and plastohydrodynamic regimes. The interactions of the parameters in each of these regimes are indicated, as well. These interactions are influenced by a large number of material and process parameters, affecting the mechanical and thermal phenomena at the contact (Rabinowicz, 1965, 1995; Schey, 1983; Bowden and Tabor, 1950). Process parameters include the temperature, speed, and reduction. In addition, the attributes of the mill affect tribology: roll diameter, hardness, surface roughness, roll cooling, bearing design, mill stiffiiess, lubricant delivery systems, including the locations of the nozzles, all contribute here. Mechanical properties of the rolls and the rolled material, including the yield stress, resistance to deformation, penetration hardness - that is, surface and bulk hardness - Young's modulus, shear modulus, density and stored elastic energy as well as the thermo-physical properties - heat transfer coefficient, heat conduction coefficient, specific heat, thermal expansion - also affect the interactions. Surface parameters, such as the chemical reactivity, defined as the tendency to acquire a film of different chemical composition than that of the rolls or rolled material, the tendency to adsorb molecules from the environment, the adsorption of water vapor and oxygen and surface energy need to be understood. Further, the random nature of scale formation, the chemical composition of the scale and the strength of the adhesive forces between the layer of scale and the parent metal must be accounted for in the studies. This indicates that the chemical MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
13 composition of the hot metal and that of the layer of scale, will also influence surface interactions. Lubricants affect surface interactions in a very significant manner and their properties must be precisely described. The chemical composition, the additives and their concentration in the base oil, the chain length, density, viscosity, viscosity - temperature, viscosity - pressure characteristics need to be known. A schematic diagram of a four-high mill, the rolled strip, lubricant delivery and some of the significant phenomena are shown in Figure 2.1.
Roll separating force Back-up roil Emulsion spray Roll torque" Work roll
Roll flattening Friction Normal stresses Heat transfer Roll wear
Rolled strip Surface defects
Figure 2.1 Rolling a strip in a four-high mill
2.1.1
The adhesion hypothesis
The hypothesis, presented by Bowden and Tabor (1950), explains the origins of resistance to motion in terms of adhesive bonds formed between the two contacting surfaces that are an interatomic distance apart. In a later publication, Bowden and Tabor (1973) credit the French scientist Desaguliers, living and working in the 18*^ century, with this idea and reproduce his account of an experiment with two lead balls which, when pressed and twisted together by hand, created adhesive bonds and were able to hold a load of 16 lbs. It is understood that engineering surfaces are never completely smooth and that they contain asperities and valleys, observable when viewed under suitable magnification. Contact occurs at the asperities, implying that the real contact area is significantly smaller than the apparent area Thus, when the two surfaces come in contact, one must distinguish between the apparent area of contact and the true area, the second of which indicating the totality of contact spots at the asperities. If the surfaces are clean, the atoms are close enough such that in order to separate them the force of attraction between them must be overcome. Cleanliness of the surface, such as the one needed for the adhesion hypothesis to be fiiUy operative, is obtained when new surfaces are created, either by plastic forming or by machining. The adhesive bond must be TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
^4 separated if relative motion is to occur. This separation may take place at the junction itself or one of the contacting metals may shear. In fact, the weakest component will give. If that is the forming die, the roll, roll wear is enhanced. If the rolled metal gives, as it often does, surface damage may result. As the load increases, the asperities flatten and the real area contact approaches that of the apparent area. The number of contacting asperities also grows and it follows that, as long as no lubricants are used, frictional resistance to relative motion would also increase, pointing out the dependence of friction on material properties, specifically on the resistance of the metals to deformation. As will be argued later, increasing loads may lead to increasing or decreasing coefficients of fhction, depending on the interaction of the parameters. Formation of the bonds takes time, indicating that the magnitude of the relative velocity of the interacting bodies, as well as the rate sensitivity of their resistance to deformation, may play important roles in determining the magnitude of the fiictional forces. Heat is transferred at the contact points, affecting the mechanical and thermal properties at the surface. As implied by the adhesion hypothesis, many of these parameters interact with and affect each other. Lubricants are used in the metal forming industry to control friction, to reduce the loads on the forming machinery, that is, on the rollmg mill, and to minimize the wear of the work rolls and the back-up rolls. As well, lubricants, through these actions, contribute to the production of high quality rolled surfaces, of prime importance to the producers. Four phenomena are of special interest when the flat rolling process is considered. The first is the type of lubricating regime - boundary, mixed, hydrodynamic - in existence in the contact zone. The second is the lubricant itself its chemical composition, including the anti-fiiction, extreme pressure, boundary and anti-oxidant additives; the viscosity of the oil and its dependence on the pressure and the temperature. The roughness of the roll and the rolled metal and the direction of the grooves - around the roll, created by a slow moving grinding wheel along the roll, or in a random direction, possibly manufactured by electrical discharge machining - are also of importance as is the thickness of the oil film. Lubricants may be applied neat as done during cold rolling of aluminum strips or in an emulsion, as is the practice when steel strips are rolled, either hot or cold. Emulsions are also employed during hot rolling of aluminum strips and slabs. The emulsions are often made up of water as the carrier, to which the oil, mixed with a suitable emulsifier and other additives, is added, in various concentrations. In that case, static and dynamic droplet size, flow rate, pressure, the type of the nozzles, their location and the location of where the spray is aimed at may also affect the events at the interface in a significant manner.
2.2
INTERACTIONS AT THE SURFACE OF CONTACT
As mentioned above, the phenomena at the surface of contact include fiictional events, lubrication, the transfer of heat and their result, the wear of the work rolls and surface defects of the rolled product. In what follows, these will be reviewed briefly, with reference to the process of flat rolling of metals, both hot and cold. In these processes, the surface of contact refers to the region between the roll and the workpiece. Friction is treated first, followed by a presentation of the effects of lubrication on the rolling process. Heat transfer is next. The last topic is the wear of work rolls. MATHEMAHCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
15 2.2.1
Friction
The basic idea is, of course, well known: when an object, in contact with another, is to be moved relative to the other, some resistance must be overcome. This resistance is caused by the interaction of the two bodies and is referred to as the interfacial friction. Overcoming it requires some effort and adds to the total work expended in starting and maintaining the relative movement of the parts. In the flat rolling process, friction at the roll - rolled metal interface is of immediate concern in this chapter. It is noted, however, that when the mill is designed and the driving motor, the spindles, bearings and the joints are sized, frictional resistance in all components of the mill must be considered. The traditional theory of friction has been suggested by Amonton who stated it 1699. As given by Hutchings (1992), the first law states that the fiiction force and the normal force are proportional, with the constant of proportionality defined as the coefficient of friction. The second observation concerns the independence of the fHctional resistance on the apparent area of contact. The third postulate considers the independence of the magnitude of the friction force on the sliding velocity. Rabinowicz (1995), in his new edition of the original text on friction and wear of materials (Rabinowicz, 1965), also discusses these three postulates. He indicates that while the first two postulates are close to actual events, experimental evidence shows that the third one is not. 2.2,1,1
Techniques of measurements for the coefficient of friction in flat rolling
Several methods for measuring interfacial fiiction during plastic deformation have been developed, some of which have been listed by Wang and Lenard (1992). A more comprehensive list, applicable to other metal forming processes, including bulk and sheet metal forming, has been presented by Schey (1983). In summary, they may be divided into the following categories: Direct measurement methods: The most typical in this group is the embedded pin transducer technique. Originally suggested by Siebel and Lueg (1933) and adapted by van Rooyen and Backofen (1960) and Al-Salehi et al. (1973), the method has been applied to measure interfacial conditions in cold rolling (Karagiozis and Lenard, 1985; Lenard and Malinowski, 1993; Lim and Lenard, 1984). Variations of this procedure have been presented by Lenard (1990, 1991) and Yoneyama and Hatamura (1987). A cantilever, machined out of the roll such that its tip is in the contact zone and fitted with straingauges, and its various refinements were presented by Banerji and Rice (1972) and Jeswiet (1991). Detailed information of the distributions of interfacial fiictional shear stresses and die - that is, the work roll - pressures may be obtained by these methods, but the experimental setup and the data acquisition are elaborate and costly. Since the major criticism concerns the possibility of some metal or oxide intruding into the clearance between the pins and their housing, it is necessary to substantiate the resulting coefficients of fiiction by independent means. This substantiation has been performed successfully in several instances (see, for example, Hum, Colquhoun and Lenard, 1996), demonstrating that the technique leads to reliable data. Measuring the average frictional shear stresses or the average coefficient of friction at the interface: Examples of methods belonging to this group are plane-strain drawing Pawelski TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
^6
^__
^
(1964), plane-strain compression with parted dies (Nagamatsu et al., 1970), and the draw-bead test, pull-out test or the twist-compression test (Schey, 1983). The draw-bead test, when performed with care, has been shown to give consistent results. A powerful and often used method is the ring-compression test, yielding the friction faaor. The relationship of the coefficient offriction,obtained by these techniques, to that in the flat rolling process, has not beenfiiUyestablished as yet. Deriving the constant friction factor or coefficient of friction front the measured deformation load: This method may be applied to various processes, such as uniaxial compression (Schroeder and Webster, 1949), extrusion, drawing and rolling (Evans and Avitzur, 1968). The resulting magnitude of the coefficient of friction will depend on the completeness of the model used for its determination. Determining the constant friction shear factor or coefficient of friction by measurements of deformation or other indirect indices: Examples involve uniaxial compression with a tapered punch (Wang, 1983); measuring the forward slip or the bite angle inflatrolling (Roberts, 1983; Reid and Schey, 1978); monitoring the fold-over in plane-strain compression (Avitzur and Kohser, 1978); or the extrusion-forging test, proposed by Gunasekera and Mahadeva (1988). The most popular and most widely used technique, however, is theringcompression test (Male and Cockroft, 1964; DePierre and Gumey, 1974). Calculating the coefficient of friction from measured values of the forward slip: Several formulae relating the coeflfident offrictionto the forward slip in terms of geometry or other parameters (Lenard, 1992) have been published in the literature. As will be discussed below, best results are obtained when all parameters - the forward slip, roll force and roll torque - are taken into account (Lenard and Zhang, 1997). Caution is needed, as the results depend, in a very significant manner, on the mathematical model used in the computations. Two of these approaches are usefiil when determining the coefficient of friction in the flat rolling process. One involves direct measurements, while the other is an inverse analysis, in which a parameter, such as the roll force, is measured and a model, in which ju is treated as a free parameter, is used to match the measured force. In the second approach the quality of the results depends on the quality and therigorof the mathematical model used. Direct measurements of the coefficient offrictionmflatrolling are possible by following the suggestions of Pavlov, quoted in Underwood's text (Underwood, 1950). By applying a large tension to the strip, the neutral point is moved to the exit, allowing the iniference of the magnitude of the coefficient from the measured roll force and torque. In another technique, the minimum coefficient offrictionis identified at the reduction at which no roll bite occurs. Both techniques lead to an average value of the coefficient. Transducers embedded in the roll, first used by Siebel and Lueg (1933) and their refinements, give the roll pressure, the interfacial shear stress and the coefficient offriction,which has been shown not to remain constant in the roll gap. Two close-up pictures of a four-pin-transducer combination are shown in Figures 2.2 and 2.3, below, reproducedfromHum et al., (1996). As shown, there are four transducers and pins. Two of these are positioned in the radial direction, while two are tilted at 25° from the radial. The transducers in the radial direction are expected to yield identical or nearly identical MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
data. When this is the case, the test is successful. Force analysis of the pins, each of which are loaded by the normal and shear forces at the contact surface, leads to the roll pressure and the shear stress distribution along the roll gap. The average of their ratio is reported as the actual coefficient of friction in the deformation zone. As mentioned above, the usual critique of the embedded pin - transducer technique is possibility that some of the rolled metal will enter the clearance between the pin and its housing. This is true, of course. However, a properly formulated model, used to extract the coefficient of friction from the collected data, must account for the effect of the resistance to movement of the pins in their carefiiUy drilled and honed holes on fiiction at the roll surface. Further, data produced using the technique may and should be substantiated in several independent ways. The roll force, measured independently by the force transducers located under or over the work roll bearing blocks, should equal the result of integration of the measured roll pressure distribution over the contact length. As well, the roll torque should be close to the resuh of the integration, again over the surface of contact, of the shear force, multiplied by the roll radius. Mathematical models, using the experimentally obtained coefficient of friction, should also yield roll forces, torques and forward slip of the correct magnitudes. Another variation of the embedded pin - transducer method was presented by Yoneyama and co-workers and used to measure the stresses and the temperatures at the roll - strip contact (Yoneyama and Hatamura, 1989; Hatamura and Yoneyama, 1988). The structure of the three-dimensional stress detector and the die-sensor used by Yoneyama and Hatamura is reproduced in Figure 2.4.
Figure 2.2 The embedded transducers Figure 2.3 The pins (Hum, Colquhoun and Lenard, 1996, reproduced with permission) TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
18
Deformation part for z-direction
Pin diameter: 3.0 rm Hole diameter: 3.1 mm Case Detective pin 3-dlrectlonal stress detector Parallel circular Plate Tight fit
Figure 2.4 The sensor of Yoneyama and Hatamura (1987), reproduced with permission
The inverse method has also been used to infer what the coefficient of friction must have been in a particular rolling pass (Lenard and Zhang, 1997). As mentioned above, the technique is useful but its results depend on the quality and rigor of the model. Implications of the choice of the mathematical model will be discussed below. 2,2. /. 2
Calculating the coefficient of friction
Relationships connecting the coefficient of friction to several parameters, have been published in the technical literature. Most of these rely on matching the measured and calculated roll separating force and choosing the coefficient of friction to allow that match. Cold rolling: The equation, given by Hill, is quoted by Hoffman and Sachs (1953), in the form: 1.08+1.02 r-y/R'Ah
K h^
/' = " 1.79 1 -
i^^
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
(2.1)
^^^^
19
where Pr is the roll separating force per unit width, a is the average flow strength in the pass and R' is the radius of the flattened roll, calculated by Hitchcock's relation, (see Eq. 4.6 in Chapter 4, One-dimensional Models). This formula has been used in several instances. Roberts (1967) derived a relationship for the coefficient of fiiction in terms of the roll separating force Pr, the radius of theflattenedroll R \ the reduction r, the average of the tensile stresses at the entry and exit GI, the average flow strength of the metal in the pass, a, and the entry thickness of the strip, hemry'-
. = = %
PM-r) r~i cr-
_^^5f 4
(2.2)
Ekelund's equation, given by Rowe (1977) in the form of the roll separating force in terms of material and geometrical parameters and the coefficient offrictionmay be inverted to yield the coefficient of friction:
'
/^ =
'••
y^R^
\{K„^+h^)^\2Ah
- , ^
J
\.64WAh
(2.3)
A comparison of the predicted magnitudes of the coefficient offrictionby these formulae is shown in Figure 2.5, using data obtained while cold rolling low carbon steel strips, lubricated with a light mineral seal oil. Two nominal reductions are considered. The first is for 15% and the second is for 50%, of originally 0.96 mm thick, 25 mm wide, AISI 1005 carbon steel strips. The tests were repeated at progressively increasing velocities, and even though the roll gap was not changed, the resulting reductions increased as the roll speeds changed. Care was taken to apply the same amount of lubricant in each test. In the figure, the coefficient of friction is plotted versus the roll surface velocity, which does not appear in any of the above formulae in an explicit manner. However, the effisct of increasing speed is feh by the roll force, which, as expected, is reduced as the roll speed and hence, the relative velocity at the contact surface increase, bringing more lubricant into the contact zone. The metal's uniaxial flow strength, in MPa, is given by: cT = 150(l + 234fr'^ All three formulae give realistic, albeit somewhat high numbers for the coefficient of friction and all predict the expected trend of lower frictional resistance with increasing velocity. As well, the coefficient of fiiction is indicated to decrease as the reductions increase, demonstrating the combined effects of the increasing number of contact points, the increasing temperature and the increasing normal pressures. Thefirsttwo phenomena result in increasing fiictional resistance with reduction. The third causes increasing viscosity and hence, decreasing fiiction and, as shown by the data, it has the dominant effect on the coefficient of friction. The TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
20
__^
magnitudes vary over a wide range, however, indicating that the mathematical model influences the results in a significant manner. 0.50 15% reduction U40H
£
0.30
o 0.20
0.10
0.00
— I
1
1
1
—
500 1000 1500 2000 roil surface speed (mm/s)
2500
Figure 2.5 The coefficient of friction, as predicted by Hill's, Roberts' and Ekelund's formulae, for cold rolling of a low carbon steel
Hoi rolling: Formulae, specifically obtained for flat, hot rolling of steel have also been published. Those given by Roberts (1983) and by Geleji, quoted by Wusatowski (1969), are presented below. Roberts' formula indicates that the coefficient of fiiction increases v^th the temperature. Geleji's relations indicate the opposite trend. Roberts combined the data obtained from an experimental 2-high mill, an 84 inch hot strip mill and a 132 inch hot strip mill, all rolling well descaled strips, and used a simple mathematical model to calculate the fiictional coefficient. Linear regression analysis then led to the relation: // = 2.7x10-^ r - 0 . 0 8
(2.4)
where T is the temperature of the workpiece in ^F. Geleji's formulae, given below, have also been obtained by the inverse method, matching the measured and calculated roll forces. For steel rolls the coefficient of fiiction is given by: // = 1.05-0.00057-0.056V
(2.5)
where the temperature is T, given here in °C and v is the rolling velocity in m/s. For double poured and cast rolls the relevant formula is: ^ = 0.94-0.00057-0.056V
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
(2.6)
and for ground steel rolls: // = 0.82 - O.OOOSr - 0.056V
(2.7)
It is observed that Geleji's relations, indicating decreasing frictional resistance with increasing temperature and rolling speed, confirm experimental trends. Rowe (1977) also gives Ekelund's formula for the coefficient of friction in hot rolling of steel: // = 0.84-0.00047
(2.8)
where the temperature is to be in excess of 700°C, again indicating that increasing temperatures lead to lower values of the coefficient of friction. Underwood (1950) attributes another equation to Ekelund, similar to those above, giving the coefficient of fiiction as: //=1.05-0.00057
(2.9)
A comparison of the predictions indicates that the relations may not be completely reliable in all instances. For example, for a steel roll and a strip temperature of 1000°C, rolled at a velocity of 3 m/s, Roberts predicts a coefficient of fiiction of 0.415 while Geleji's relation gives 0.382, indicating that the numbers are close. When 900°C is considered, Roberts' coefficient becomes 0.366 and Geleji's increases to 0.432, creating a large difference. Ekelund's predictions are 0.44 and 0.48, at 900°C and 1000°C, respectively. While all of these numbers appear realistic, their use in predictive-adaptive models that control hot strip mills may create some problems. As will be shown in Chapter 4, dealing with the sensitivity of roll force predictions of mathematical models of the flat rolling process, even small changes of the coefficient of friction, to be used in mill control strategies, create large variations of the roll force as well as attendant changes in the predicted roll torques. The control systems may have difficulties with the necessary adjustments. A thorough understanding of the magnitudes of the coefficient of fiiction, as a fiinction of the process variables, is necessary. The forward slip: The forward slip, defined as the ratio of the relative velocity of the exiting strip to the surface speed of the roll - see Eq. 2.13, below - has also been related to the coefficient of fiiction and various other mechanical and geometrical parameters of the rolling process. Several equations have been published, including Ekelund's formula (1933), that includes the roll gap bite angle, a:
M=-
a 2
(2.10)
ISj. ^ - 1
TRIBOLOGY OF FLA T ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
22
_^
and the relationship of Roberts (1978), which includes the roll force and the roll torque: M M=-
PM
(2.11)
,-v^^^
These and other relations have been reviewed by Lenard (1992) and it was concluded that while all of them give numbers for the coefficient offrictionthat are close to the actual values, none of them gives the appropriate trend. The conclusions agree with that of Jarl (1988) who used Ekelund's formula in the hot rolling process and found the results unreliable. 2.2.2
Lubrication using neat oils and emulsions
The introduction of lubrication, either in the form of neat oils or emulsions, during hot/cold rolling has several objectives. Lubricants help to reduce the rolling loads, that is, the roll separating forces and the roll torques, resulting in lower energy expenditure. It aids in the production of high quality surfaces, resulting in a higher value added product. These are achieved by controUmg the coefficient offrictionand at the same time, affecting the transfer of heat at the contact zone. The wear rate of the work rolls and the back-up rolls may decrease and the need for frequent roll changes may diminish. If properly designed and delivered, the lubricants may also reduce the incidence of surface defects. The nature of the lubrication in the contact zone affects both the dimensional consistency of the product and its surface quality. One of the important objectives in what follows is to concentrate on an understanding of the events in the contact zone. The conclusions drawn are be based on the effect of the process and material parameters on the roll separating forces, roll torques, the forward slip and, when available, the surface quality of the rolled metal. Emulsions, mostly of the oil-in-water type, are also considered, even though experimental results obtained while hot or cold rolling steel strips are not numerous. 2.2 2.1
The lubrication regimes
Essentially, there are three lubrication regimes of interest in metal forming processes. The first one, following dry rolling, is boundary lubrication, characterized by significant amounts of metal to metal contact and some lubricating pockets where the thickness of the oil film is low and the asperities cut through the lubricant. As the lubricant viscosity or the relative velocity are increased, a mixed mode of lubrication is observed, in which more lubricant pockets are created and less asperity contact is found. In both these regimes the surface roughness of the resulting product decreases as a consequence of the contact and will likely approach that of the work roll. The hydrodynamic regime follows in which complete separation of the contacting surfaces has been achieved and the lubricant film is thicker than the combined surface roughness of the roll and rolled metal. Free plastic deformation of the surface grains causes some roughening and the rolled surface emerges rougher. Further subdivision of the hydrodynamic regime is possible by identifying elastohydrodynamic or plasto-hydrodynamic lubrication. These depend on the nature of the MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
23
deformation of the asperities, specifically their resistance to deformation and whether that is elastic, elasto/plastic or fully plastic. The Sttiheck curve: The lubrication regimes may be illustrated well by making reference to the Stribeck curve, first plotted to study fiiction in the bearings of rail car wheels. In the Stribeck curve (Hutchings, 1992), the coefficient of friction is plotted against the modified Sommerfeld number (Mortier and Orszulik, 1992, identify the dimensionless group as the Hersey number) defined as: S = -^—
(2.12)
where the absolute or dynamic viscosity is ;;, in Pa s, the relative velocity is Av = v^// x Sf, in rad/s and the pressure is obtained by dividing the roll separating force by the projected contact area, according to/7 = F/wl, in Pa. The forward slip, Sf, is defined in terms of the roll surface and the strip velocity: S^^l^Ll^
(2.13)
The dynamic viscosity is given in terms of the kinematic viscosity (//) and the density (p): n = MP
(2.14)
where the kinematic viscosity is in cST = 10"^ m^/s and the density is in kg/ml The magnitude of the dynamic viscosity depends strongly on the process parameters and is affected mostly by the temperature and the pressure. Increasing the temperature lowers the viscosity and results in higher coefficients of friction. Increasing the pressure increases the viscosity and in many instances causes lower frictional resistance. Correcting the dynamic viscosity for the effects of the temperature and pressure is therefore necessary if their effects are to be evaluated correctly. Data on these coefficients are not easy to find. The relationship often used is: ri=rioexp{yp-dT)
(2.15)
where y is the pressure-viscosity coefficient and the temperature-viscosity coefficient is S. The uncorrected viscosity is rjo. Sa and Wilson (1994), in a recent publication concerning full fluidfilmlubrication, introduced a cross-coefficient, S, to account for the interaction of y and d. Their equation is given as: r}=%exp{yp-SpT-ST)
(2.16)
It is understood that the interaction of the temperature and the pressure effects on the viscosity may well be very significant. However, no easy way of determining the cross-coefficient appears to be available at the present time. While values for the coefficients are difficult to find TRIBOLOGY OF FLA TROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
24
_^
for special lubricants, a good collection of data is presented by Booser (1984), some of which is reproduced in Table 2.1. Table 2.1 The temperature dependence of the viscosity of some lubricant types (Booser, 1984; reproduced with permission) Kinematic viscosity, cSt, at Lubricant type
lOOX
-40°C
Fluorolube
2.9
500000
Hydrocarbon
3.4
50000
Ester
4.4
3600
Polyglycol ether
4.6
7000
Phosphate base
4.6
8000
Ester base
6.3
1000
Silicone
9.5
150
As observed in the values of the viscosity - temperature coefficients, the sensitivity of the viscosity to changes in surface temperatures is very significant. During the rolling process, much of the heat is generated at the contact surface, caused by thefrictionalforces there. The temperatures can reach very high magnitudes and simple calculations give 100 - 200°C, at not very high speeds and at not very high reductions. At high speeds and high reductions the temperature rise would be significantly higher. Breakdown of the lubricants is a real possibility and the draft schedules need to be designed with this in mind. It is also well known that increasing pressures increase the viscosity of oils. This dependence can be described in terms of an exponential relationship. For mineral oils, the viscosity - pressure coefficient is given by Hutchings (1992) as: r « (0.6 + 0.9651ogio 77o)x 10''
(2.17)
where the viscosity at zero pressure, TJO, is in centipoise. Note that the absolute viscosity in centipoise is equal to the kinematic viscosity in centistokes multiplied by the density in kg/dm^ (Booser, 1984), and the units of the viscosity - pressure coefficient are Pa'\ The pressure - viscosity coefficients, for a number of automotive oils, are given in the Table 2.2 below. Information regarding the viscosity - temperature coefficient may also be extracted from the table by assuming a linear variation between 40 and 100°C. Alternatively, the Walther equation may be used, provided the required constants are available (Booser, 1984): log log(// + c) = a- blog T MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
(2.18)
25
where a and b are constants, c varies with the viscosity and ju is the kinematic viscosity in centistokes. Details concerning these constants and their magnitudes are given by the D341 ASTM standards. Table 2.2 The viscosity - pressure coefficient for selected lubricants (Booser, 1984; reproduced with permission) SAE Grade kinematic viscosity (cSt) viscosity-pressure coefficient lOOX
40°C
(Pa')
low
5.57
32.6
2.29x10-^
20W
8.81
62.3
2.48x10"^
30
11.9
100
2.68 X 10"^
40
14.7
140
2.67x10-'
5W-20
6.92
38
2.17x10"*
lOW-30
10.2
66.4
2.36x10-'
lOW-40
14.4
77.1
2.25x10-'
lOW-50
20.5
117
2.34 X 10-'
A schematic of the Stribeck curve is shown in Figure 2.6, with the boundary, mixed and hydrodynamic mode of lubrication identified.
Boundary
Mixed
Hydrodynamic
viscosity x velocity / pressure
Figure 2.6 A schematic of the Stribeck curve
TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
26 Knowing the coefficient offriction,the curve allows one to determine the extent of various lubricating regimes in a metalforming process. In the first portion, where the viscosity of the lubricant and the relative velocity of the contacting surfaces are low and the interfacial pressure is high, boundary lubrication is observed and the roughness of the resulting surfaces will approach that of the forming die, that is, the work roll. As oils of higher viscosity are introduced in the contact zone at higher relative speeds, the boundary regime changes, more lubricant is drawn in the contact zone, and more lubricating pockets are created in the valleys in between the asperities and the "mixed mode" of lubrication, involving less metal-to-metal contact, is found. Moving further toward the right along the axis of the Sommerfeld number, the hydrodynamic regime is located, characterized by complete separation of the contacting surfaces. In this regime, the increase of the coefficient offrictionis a result of increasingfiictionalresistance in the oilfilm,usually characterized as a Newtonian fluid, separating the surfaces. In this region, the product surface roughens after rolling because of thefreeplastic deformation of the grains near and at the surface. Lubricant composition: In addition to the surface attributes and the nature of contact, the chemical composition of the lubricant is also to be considered. Guminski and WilHs (1959-60) presented a comprehensive study of the chemical compositions of lubricants, using plane strain compression of aluminum. They defined the term "reduction capacity" as the reduction possible with a lubricant without surface damage and demonstrated that it increased with the chain length and the polarity of the additives. Branched molecules were found to have a lower reduction capacity than the straight-chain molecules containing the same number of carbon atoms. Di-polar additives were shown to have considerably lower reduction capacity than the corresponding mono-polar additives. The reduction capacity was observed to be comparatively lower for the unsaturated additives than for the saturated ones. Kondo (1975) used Kensol 71M - a mineral seal oil - as the base oil, and either alcohol or fatty acid esters as additives to examine their effects on friction during cold rolling of aluminum strips. He concluded that the coefficient of friction was much higher with the fatty acid ester than with the alcohol. Azushima (1978) evaluated the effects of three base oils - a naphthenic oil, a paraflfinic oil and a synthetic ester - on the coefficient of friction, concluding that the naphthenic oil caused the largest drop in friction forces, followed by the paraffinic and synthetic ester base oils. The viscosities of these oils were similar. The author hypothesized that the differences in the viscosity pressure coefficients accounted for the variations of friction. The samples were made of annealed low carbon steel. Matsui et al. (1984) used a paraffinic base oil mixed with three different additives having the same carbon chain length. The additives were lauryl alcohol, lauric acid and methyl laureate, at a 5% (v/v) concentration. They found that the most preferable additive for rolling of pure aluminum was the alcohol. The authors attributed the reduction in rolling forces to the homogeneous coating of aluminum oxide on the roll surfaces. The same types of additives with different carbon chain lengths were then employed. Friction was observed to decrease with increasing chain length. Using the same technique as Matsui et al. (1984), Kihara (1990) evaluated the effects on the coefficient of friction of three additives - butyl laureate, lauric acid, and lauryl alcohol, at 5% (w/w), in a low viscosity paraffinic base oil. It was noticed that with the alcohol as an additive the friction was the lowest. With the acid and ester as additives, the friction was found to be MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
27
higher. As expected, without any additives the friction measured was the highest. The author attributed the highest friction to severe roll coating or adhesion. Nautiyal and Schey (1990) observed that both lauric and oleic acids were ineffective, even at 5% concentration by volume, and that only stearic acid was able to lower friction in a significant manner, in their twist-compression experiments with 6061-T6 aluminum specimens. Among the fatty alcohols, lauryl alcohol was ineffective at 1% and 5% in mineral seal oil and only marginally usefiil at 5% concentration in SAE 10 oil, contradicting the findings of Matsui et al. (1984). Stearyl alcohol, found to be useless at 1% concentration, gave a significant improvement at 5% in mineral seal oil. There appears to be a consensus that mineral oil with appropriate additives is usefiil when cold rolling of aluminum is considered. Palm oil, natural or synthetic, in an emulsion may be used when steel is cold rolled. Mineral oil in water emulsion may be used when hot rolling aluminum. Synthetic oil in water emulsion may be used when hot rolling steel. Emulsifiers and additives are used as required. Boundary additives are numerous and a complete list is beyond the scope of the present work. Some of them may be mentioned, and these include lauryl and stearyl alcohol, lauric, stearic or oleic acids. Extreme pressure additives are also necessary and again, the list is large. Schey (1983) and Booser (1984), among others, compile the available additives. The oil film thickness: The oilfilmthickness at the inlet may be calculated by the formula of Wilson and Walowit (1971), given below:
/[l-exp(-;^o-JJ where rjo is the dynamic viscosity at 38°C, in Pa s, and ;^is the pressure-viscosity coefl&cient in Pa"\ The radius of the flattened roll, calculated by the Mtchcock formula, is designated by /?' in m, the roll surface velocity is v^//, the entry velocity of the strip is Ve„try> both in m/s and / stands for the projected contact length, also in m. The average flow strength in the pass is given by cr^, in units that match those of y. It is possible to determine the nature of the lubricating regime by comparing the thickness of the oil film and the combined asperity heights of the rolls and the rolled metal. Following Hutchings (1992), their ratio is defined as:
A =- ^
(2.20)
(J
where hmtn is the thickness of the oil film, calculated by the above formula and a* is the r.m.s. roughness of the two surfaces, given by: -yj^^r^
(2.21)
TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
28
_ ^
and Rgi and R^2 are the r.m.s. surface roughness values of the two surfaces. When the oil film thickness to surface roughness ratio is less than unity, boundary lubrication is observed. In the region of 1 < A < 3 a mixed lubrication mode prevails while for a ratio over three, hydrodynamic conditions and full separation of the contacting surfaces is present. 2.2.3
Heat transfer
Heat transfer plays an important role in metalforming processes where both the workpiece and tool behavior are strongly effected by the temperature fields. The heat flux at the workpiece/tool interface is commonly assumed to be governed by the interface heat transfer coefficient and the temperatures of the contacting surfaces, as given below: q-cc{T^.-T^)
(2.22)
where a is the heat transfer coefficient. The boundary conditions at the interface are usually formulated in terms of the heat transfer coefficient. This leads to the numerical solutions of a great number of practical, industrial problems, among them the temperature field in the work roll and the rolled metal. The solutions, of course, involve the integration of the quasiharmonic heat transfer equation, by either the finite difference or finite element method. The quality of the results will depend, to a great extent, on the rigor and the accuracy of the mathematical descriptions of the boundary conditions. While the solution algorithms are now well established relatively little work has been reported regarding procedures that lead to an estimate of the interface heat transfer coefficient in bulk forming processes. There are essentially two approaches by which the heat transfer coefficient may be determined. One of these is the attempt to choose a such that calculated and measured temperature distributions will agree closely. The other is to use the experimentally established time-temperature profiles to estimate the temperatures of the two contacting surfaces and use the definition of the heat transfer coefficient as the ratio of the heat flux and the temperature difference of the surfaces. Naturally, both of the methods have limitations. In the former, success depends on the quality, accuracy and rigor of both the measurements that are to match the predictions of a model and those of the model itself The latter is also dependent on the measurements in addition to the technique of determining the surface temperatures and hence, their difference. Among those that employed the first method is Chen et al, (1993). The authors measured the time-temperature profiles during hot rolling of aluminum strips, using four thermocouples, two of which were embedded in the strip and the two others were located in grooves, machined on the surfaces. The heat transfer coefficient at the roll/strip contact surface was then inferred by matching the surface temperatures, calculated by a thermal-mechanical model of the process, to the data collected by the thermocouples located in the grooves. The conclusion emerging from the study indicated that a was not constant along the arc of contact and that it was a function of the roll pressure distribution, the interface oxide layer, the surface roughness and, if a lubricant is used, the surface chemistry. The heat transfer coefficient was found to vary fi-om a low of 10000 W/Km^ to 54000 W/Km^ for a variety of reductions. A similar approach was described by Sellars (1985), who wrote that ..." a trial-and-error procedure of MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
29 fitting experimental cooling data enabled values the heat transfer coefficient to be determined as a function of reheating temperatures and lubrication conditions". Dadras and Wells (1984) also determined a by a trial-and-error procedure, using the predictions of a two dimensional finite difference model. Semiatin et al., (1987) developed a technique by which the heat transfer coefficient can be estimated based on the measurement of the die temperature brought into contact with the deforming workpiece. A one-dimensional analysis, developed by Klafs (1969), and a finite difference model were used to derive calibration curves in terms of temperature differences of the die and the workpiece, from which the heat transfer coefficients were determined. The technique, proposed by Semiatin et al., (1987) led to constant values of the heat transfer coefficient for the given initial conditions. The technique was used to develop further data, applicable for the process of hot forging by Burke et al., (1990). Tool steel dies were used in the experiments in which aluminum alloyringswere compressed. The heat transfer coefficients at the interfaces were determined for a large range of parameters: temperatures up to 420°C and pressures up to 150 MPa were employed. The direct experimental technique, used later by Chen et al., (1993), was followed by Karagiozis (1986) and Pietrzyk and Lenard (1988, 1991). The method involved hot rolling of carbon steel slabs, instrumented with several thermocouples, monitoring their output during the pass and inferring the surface temperatures of the slabs in the contact zone by extrapolation. The original definition of the heat transfer coefficient in terms of the heat flux and the difference of the temperatures of the contacting surfaces was then used to determine the magnitude of a. As mentioned already, both approaches have drawbacks. It is also understood, however, that accurate values of the heat transfer coefficient - one of the boundary conditions for the evaluation of variables during hot forming - are critical if accurate and consistent modeling of a metalforming process is required. The process parameters that affect the coefficient of heat transfer are the velocity, the roll diameter, temperature, and reduction (Pietrzyk and Lenard, 1991). The heat penetration number and the thermal difilisivity of the rolls, both of which are dependent on heat conductivity, density, and heat capacity, are also of importance along with the parameters of the processed material. The type and the amount of scale which lowers heat transfer should also be considered. Lubrication has been shown to cause a difference of two orders of magnitude of a when combined with the presence of scale (Murata et al., 1984; Pietrzyk and Lenard, 1991). As well, one can only speculate about the effects the relative velocity between the strip and the roll, the nature of scale formation and the varying roll pressure would have on the coefficient of heat transfer. As mentioned in the Introduction, the number of process and material parameters is large. There is significant interaction among the parameters, as well. It is therefore necessary to focus on those parameters that may be controlled with reasonable confidence in a systematic testing program. In what follows, the temperature, the load and the relative velocity of the contacting surfaces are considered as the most significant, and their effect on the coefficient of heat transfer will be discussed. Hot rolling in the laboratory (Karagiozis and Lenard, 1988), hot rolling in industry (Pietrzyk and Lenard, 1990) and hot compression (Malinowski and Lenard, 1993; Lenard and Davies, 1995) under carefully controlled conditions will be examined. TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
22 Z 2 3.1
Hot rolling in the laboratory - heat transfer coefficient
Murata et al., (1984) measured the heat transfer coefficient in uniaxial compression and reported the effects of several lubricants and scale on its magnitude. The specimens were made of carbon steel, containing 0.12% C. They were loaded in compression resulting in an interfacial pressure of 49 MPa. Some of the specimens were heated to 780°C while the others were kept at room temperature. All were instrumented with 0.5 mm diameter, sheathed thermocouples. The contact surfaces were prepared with either scales, lubricants or were kept dry. The resuhs show that the heat transfer coefficient varied from a low of 5.8 kW/m^ K to a high of 465 kW/m^ K, nearly a two-order of magnitude variation. It is noted that the testing temperature is significantly below the hot rolling range for most steels. Further, one may only speculate about the effects of the relative velocity between the strip and the roll, the random nature of scale formation or the roll pressure on the coefficient of heat transfer. Further examination of the published values of the coefficient make its choice for use in modeling even more difficuU. Stevens et al., (1971) suggest 38700 w W K for hot rolling with watercooled rolls. Preisendanz et al., (1967) also provide values within the ranges mentioned above; they give 1.2 and 2.5 MJ/m^s at 700 and 1100°C, respectively. Silvonen et al., (1987) use 70000 W/m^ K in their recent publication while Bryant and Chiu (1982) employ 7000 W/m^ K. These values have all been obtained on full scale production mills. Using a research mill Harding (1976) obtained a as 2055 w W K at 700°C and 5100 w W K at 1100°C. These values are close to those of Pietrzyk and Lenard (1991), also obtained on an experimental mill. Recent work by Wankhede and Samarasekera (1997) uses a transient thermal model to analyze the behavior of tool steel rolls. The authors quote the study of Chen et al., (1996) who reported a relationship of the heat transfer coefficient and the interfacial pressure in the form: a = 0.695/7 - 34.4
(2.23)
where p is the pressure in MPa and a is the coefficient of heat transfer in kW/m^C. For a pressure of 150 MPa, typical of the loads in some of the finishing mill stands, the formula predicts a heat transfer coefficient of 69.85 kWWC, a realistic number. As the rolling speeds and hence, the strain rates increase, the rolled metal's resistance to deformation would also increase and the roll pressures required would approach 200 MPa. Eq. (2.23) would then predict a heat transfer coefficient of 104.6 kW/m^C, considered to be much too high. For the determination of the heat transfer coefficient, thermocouples embedded in the tail end of low carbon steel strips were used. Four thermocouples were employed in most tests. One was located centrally; one was near the edge, on the centerline. Two thermocouples were near the surface, located 2.5 mm below. Attempts to place the thermocouples closer were not successful, due to the stress concentration caused by embedding. The temperature measurements allowed the estimation of the surface temperatures by extrapolation and these led directly to the heat transfer coefficients. The details of the temperature measurements were given by Karagiozis and Lenard (1988). The slabs, measuring 19x50x200 and 38x50x200 mm, were rolled to different reductions, at different temperatures and at different roll speeds. Typical results of the time-temperature profiles obtained are shown in Figure 2.7 with the appropriate process parameters given in the figure caption. The results of calculations, using MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
_^
M
the finite-element program Elroll and employing various heat transfer coefficients, are also given. The best comparison of measured and computed temperatures is obtained when the coefficient is 16 kW/m^K. The temperature is plotted along the ordinate and the time is given on the abscissa. These, along with the data given by Pietrzyk and Lenard (1989) and Karagiozis (1986), a compilation of which is shown in Table 2.3, allow an appreciation of the dependence of the heat transfer coefficient on the reduction, entry thickness, roll speed, temperature drop in the pass and entry temperature. Details of the calculations, given by Pietrzyk et al., (1994), are reviewed here briefly. The change in the heat content of the strip in the pass is given by: (2.24)
Q=PCp{T.„.ry~T^rhc7^6,
where p is the density, Cp is the specific heat, ap is the average flow stress in the pass, and f, is the effisctive strain. If air cooling of the sides is neglected, the total heat loss is equal to the heat flux through the contact surface. The heat transfer coefficient is obtained fi-om:
(2.25)
where Tstnp - Tnii defines the average difference of the surface temperatures of the roll and the strip in the contact zone and / designates the time of contact. The temperatures needed are obtained by integration over the volume of the strips. The coefficient at the interface is then calculated for each case and the appropriate values are given in the last column of Table 2.3.
880 • n O O
840
o
measurements 10 kW/m^K 13 KW/m^K 16 kW/m^
o
§
800
2.
E
S 760
720 ~i 2
r 4 time, s
Figure 2.7 Time-temperature profile; 20% reduction at 4 rpm TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
22
_ _ 3
As observed in Figure 2.7, the thermocouple, near the surface indicates sudden losses immediately on entry. Following exit, the central portion of the slab is acting as a heat source and much of the lost surface temperature is regained. Analyses of similar tests gave the data, compiled in Table 2.3. In the tests, the roll diameter was 254 mm, the roll material was D2 tool steel, hardened to Re = 54. The temperature, rolling speed, entry thickness and the reduction were the independent variables.
Table 2.3 Heat transfer coefficients, obtained on a laboratory mill (Pietrzyk et al., 1994; reproduced with permission) % red. rpm a(kW/m^K) hentry (mm)
7 7
15 15
4 10
12.78
6
15.4
3
15.27
10 21 21
15.5
4
10.85
19 19
4 10
12.78
19
19
4
9.8
20 11 20
19
12.31
38
4 4 4
20
38 38
4 10
18
20.1
12
13.74
24
18.3
12
9.6
19
30.9
15.35
13.99
13.06 15.93 11.79 20.76
A comparison of the predictions of the relation, proposed by Chen et al. (1993) is now possible. The average roll pressure in the experiment using the 19 mm thick strip, reduced by 21% at 4 rpm is estimated to be 162 MPa. Eq. (2.24) predicts a heat transfer coefficient of 78 kWWK while the calculations, based on the experimental data, give 12.78 kWWK. The discrepancy is caused by the fact that the heat transfer coefficient is dependent on several parameters, in addition to the pressure. As pointed out by Hlady et al. (1995), and also quoted by Wankhede and Samarasekera (1997), the thermal properties of the roll and the strip and the surface flow stress should also be included in an empirical relationship. In addition to those, the strip and the roll temperature, the relative speed of the roll and the workpiece, the scale thickness, its composition, hardness and roughness should be accounted for. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
_^
33
Evidently, more systematic experiments are needed in which the temperatures of the roll, as well as that of the rolled strip, are monitored as a function of the significant process and material parameters. These should include the roll pressure, relative speed and the temperature. The data should then be used to develop either an empirical relation or to train a neural network, which, after satisfactory testing, may be used as a predictive tool. 2 2.3,2
Hot rolling in industry - heat transfer coefficient
Even though direct measurements of the heat transfer coefficient under industrial conditions are rare, there is a consensus among the researchers and users that it appears to be significantly larger than values obtained in the laboratory. The difficulties in conducting trials using a full scale strip mill are probably impossible to overcome and this necessitates the use of inverse calculations, in which a variable is measured and calculations are used to match that variable by treating the heat transfer coefficient as afi-eeparameter. Recall that this approach is also used often to determine the coefficient of fiiction. Calculations were performed using data obtained from several hot strip mills. In the first instance, the heat transfer coefficient that matched the temperature of the surface of the transfer bar before entry to thefinishingtrain and after exitfromthe last stand best was 50000 W/m K. In the second instance, when strip surface temperatures at the entry to each stand were available, the heat transfer coefficient varied from a low of 75000 W/m^K at the first stand to 88000 W/m^K at the last. It is emphasized here that these numbers depend, in a very significant manner, on the data available from mill logs. Traditionally, these include the surface temperature of the strip after the rougher and before coiling but they do not provide stand-to-stand temperature data. 2 2,3.3
Hot compression of stainless steel
Two stainless steel 303 dies, of 25.4 mm diameter each, were instrumented with four type K (chromel-alumel) thermocouples of 1.6 mm outside diameter, with INCONEL sheaths and exposed beads, located 2, 4, 10 and 25 mmfromthe contact surface and embedded to a depth of 10 mm. The dies were connected to the watercooled heat exchangers of a servohydraulic testing system. One of the dies was heated to a preselected temperature in a split, openable fiimace. When the desired temperature was reached, the fiimace was removed and the cold die was brought into contact with the hot one under closely controlled conditions. The velocity of approach was selected at 0.83 mm/sec. After contact was made, the control of the closed-loop testing system was switched from "STROKE" to "LOAD" automatically and the load was increased, at a rate of 110 MPa/sec, to a predetermined level and kept there until the experiment was completed. During the approach of the dies and throughout the test the output of the eight thermocouples was monitored using a computer-based data acquisition system. The initial temperature of the hot die was varied from 300 to 900°C/sec. The interfacial pressures were varied from 30 to 90 MPa. The schedule of the experiments was as follows. First, the 300°C tests were conducted, at 30, 50, 70 and 90 MPa. Then the temperature was increased to 500°C and the above sequence was repeated. The experiments at 700°C and 900°C followed, with the low pressures first, the higher pressures later. The same dies were TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
24
^^__^
^__^
used throughout the program; the contact surfaces were left unchanged. The initial surface roughness of the cold die was 0.42^m centreline average, and that of the hot die was 0.61^m. The inverse technique, using a finite elertient model, has been used to calculate the interfacial heat transfer coefficient for different normal pressures and initial temperatures of the workpiece. The tests were conducted using pressures of 30, 50, 70 and 90 MPa and workpiece temperatures of 300, 500, 700 and 900°C for each pressure. 2.2 i. 4
Calculating the heat transfer coefficient
Figures 2.8, 2.9, 2.10 and 2.11 show the complete set of the resuhs of the finite element computations, depicting the heat transfer coefficient as a function of the time of contact, beginning when the die and the workpiece just begin to touch, for various conditions. The data are given by symbols: circles for 30 MPa, squares for 50 MPa, triangles for 70 MPa and the stars for 90 MPa. The initial temperature of the hot workpiece is 300°C in Figure 2.8; 500°C, 700°C and 900°C, respectively in the next three figures. 25000
^>J\J\J\J
[
I
+ 20000 - O n [A
T = 300°C ^ p = 30 MPa p = 50 MPa P = 70 MPa p = 90MPaj
^
I
A A A
20000
A
(D O
A
15000-
T = 500*C ] P = 30 MPa o P = 50 MPa D P = 70 MPa A P = 90 MPa J
+
.«> 15000
A A
1
^AAAAAAAAAA
10000-
8 A^^
^, 10000 H
n° °
0° ° 5000-
%
^/^^^"^^^ n -1 1
10
5000
++++^++ * 1
1 20 30 time of contact (s)
1 40
Figure 2.8 The coefficient of heat transfer; 300X
50
10
I 1 I 20 30 40 time of contact (s)
50
Figure 2.9 The coefficient of heat transfer; 500°C
The heat transfer coefficients, as computed by the inverse technique described above, vary in a broad range from 50 to 20000 W/Km^ For the first 2 - 5 seconds, a increases at a reasonably fast rate but its magnitude is not very large, indicating that the combined effects of the developing mechanisms cause those changes. These include the rate of rise of the pressure, reaching its full magnitude, typically in less than 0.8 seconds; the corresponding increase of the heat flux and the decrease of the difference of the temperatures of the two contacting surfaces, the ratio of which defines the coefficient of heat transfer. After approximately 5 seconds of contact, a much slower rise of the coefficient or steady-state conditions are observed. The slow rise of a appears to be connected to higher interfacial pressures, regardless of the MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
35 temperatures. The heat transfer coefficient then remains constant at pressures below 70 MPa. The exception is indicated by the data for the experiments in which the initial workpiece temperature was 900°C. Fast initial rise of a is still noted but the rate of rise of the heat transfer coefficient at the higher pressures is lower than before. Steady-state condition is achieved noticeably later. The heat transfer coefficient appears to be strongly dependent on the interfacial pressures at all of the test temperatures. It does not appear however, to be as strongly dependent on the temperature. 20000
^ t
16000
20000 T = 700*^ 1 + P = 30 MPa o P = 60 MPa n P = 70 MPa A P = 90 MPa
12000
fc
1 i
A~ «nnDD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8000 >
ooo%4
4000
1
10
I
\
1—
20 30 40 time of contact (s)
Figure 2.10 The coefficient of heat transfer; 700°C
50
"T 20 30 time of contact (s)
Figure 2.11 The coefficient of heat transfer; 900°C
Steady-state conditions are reached in most of the experiments, indicating that the ratio of the heat flux and the interfacial temperature diffisrence remains reasonably constant. The transfer of heat is not expected to be effected by the flattening of the asperities as this phenomenon must happen at the beginning of the test. Beyond the first few seconds of contact, the true area is expected to remain unchanged. Non-linear regression analysis: The experiments conducted were designed to simulate bulk forming of metals using a cold die. Upset forging is the process that is most closely simulated by the tests. In order to ease the choice of the interfacial heat transfer coefficient when mathematical modeling of that process is contemplated, empirical relations were developed, giving a as afiinctionof time and three parameters, A, B and Q, each of which is expressed as a fiinction of the non-dimensionalized pressure and temperature. The equation given below may then be used to estimate the coefficient of heat transfer:
a = l000[{A-2BQ)t-Bt^\
(2.26)
TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
^6
^_^_
where the coefficients A, B and Q are given in terms of the non-dimensional pressure/? = P/100 and the temperature, T = TVIOOO. The time is designated by t in seconds, P is the pressure in MPa and T* is the temperature in °C. For t in between Q and 0, the coefficients are given by: A = [ -0.99861 + 1.39288/7 + 4.162827'- 1.93378/? ^ - 7.58453r^ + 4.855247 Y B = [ -1.40191 + 1.50341/7 + 5.513427- 0.8955/? ^ - 5.718637^ + 1.199367^ Q = [18.81105 - 24.37649/7 - 55.55337+ 35.30695/7 ^ + 45.073177^ + 40.672357^ 16.59242/7 ^ - 42.087327*f + 4 Eq. (2.26) is vahd up to 700°C and pressures below 90 MPa. It is emphasised that these relations were obtained in a compression process in which the effect of the relative velocity is not very large. Calculations using Eq. (2.26) give values of the heat transfer coefficient quite close to the measured data of Figures 2.8 - 2.10. The applicability of Eq. (2.26) in the flat rolling process remains unanswered. The predictions, however, appear to be in the right ball park.
2.3
THE DEPENDENCE OF INTERFACIAL PHENOMENA ON PROCESS AND MATERIAL PARAMETERS
As mentioned above, the tribological system involves a very large number of parameters, the interaction of which determines the success of the rolling process. In what follows, a judicial decision is taken to limit the discussion to only those parameters deemed most important. The process parameters in the flat rolling process, of prime importance, are then taken to be the reduction, the speed, the temperature and the surface roughness. The material parameters include the resistance of the metal to deformation, its surface hardness and its parameters of anisotropy. The effects of each of these on the phenomena at the roll/strip contact will be considered below, in light of how they affect the flat rolling process. 2.3.1
The effect of the reduction
As the reduction is increased, the loads on the rolled metal and thus, the roll pressures, increase. The asperities are flattened and the real area of contact approaches the apparent area, at a rate that depends on the contacting metals' elastic and plastic strengths. The number of adhesive bonds formed also increases, and the strength of these bonds will depend on the two materials, including their chemical affinity for each other. Using no lubricants and well cleaned surfaces, the frictional resistance will likely increase. The roughness of the rolled surface will be reduced with the roll's surface imprinted on the metal. Rabinowicz (1995) presents data on the coefficient of friction, measured using steel sliding on aluminum, under a large range of loads, from a low of 10"^ grams to 1000 grams. His data are reproduced here as Figure 2.12, indicating that the coefficient is independent of the load. These results contradict the data obtained during unlubricated cold rolling of aluminum alloy MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
37
strips using steel rolls (Lim and Lenard, 1984), in which the coefficient of friction, measured using the first version of the embedded transducer - pin combination (employing two sets of pins), clearly mcreased with the loads. The contradiction is more apparent than real, however, as Rabinowicz uses a best-fit line through the data points to draw his conclusions. T 1.5 h-
o o
8
1.0K
C
^—•_• • • •
•
o data of Whitehead (1950) steel on aluminum uniubricated
0.5 h
10"
10-'
10 load, g
10^
10-^
lO**
Figure 2.12 The coefficient of friction is shown to be independent of the load; steel on aluminum (Rabinowicz, 1995; reproduced with permission) A different picture emerges when the sliding of copper on copper with no lubricants is considered in Figure 2.13, showing a large change of the fnctional resistance as the interfacial load is increased. Recent experimental studies, obtained when rolling aluminum strips indicate that the reduction, and thus the load, is a significant contributor tofrictionalresistance. 1
1
1
1
1
^j
y^^
1.5
1
o a>
8 c
1.0
—
0.5
—
/
o
n 10-^
9
copper on copper uniubricated
1
1
10-^
1
1 10 load, g
1
1
10^
103
—\
Figure 2.13 Friction, observed with copper sliding on copper, shows a marked dependence on the load (Rabinowicz, 1995; reproduced with permission) TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
38 Further, the coefficients are significantly higher than the measurements of more recent experiments, conducted under actual conditions, indicate. These reflect the difficulty and the importance of surface cleanliness, probably not fiilly achieved in industry or in the laboratory. Figure 2.14 shows the data, plotting the coefficient of fiiction against the reduction. 0.24
0.20
£
Alloy . speed (rpmj + 1100-HO o 1100-H14 5052-H34 J
I°
0.16
jg 0.12 H
0.08
0.04
1
5
1
1
10 15 reduction (%)
1
20
25
Figure 2.14 The dependence of the coefficient of fiiction on the reduction during cold rolling of aluminum alloys, with no lubrication (Karagiozis and Lenard, 1985, reproduced with permission) At this point, all one can conclude is that the coeffident of fiiction is definitely dependent on the normal loads. The exact nature of that dependence is not yet clear, but is likely connected to the attributes of the contacting materials, their elastic and plastic strength, roughness, relative velocity, etc. In fact, it is the interaction of these parameters that will determine thefirictionalbehavior of the contacting materials. Introducing lubricants into the contact surface changes the reaction of the rolled metal to the reduction, as indicated above when the Stribeck curve was introduced. The number of operating mechanisms also increases and these involve the composition of the oil, the presence of anti-fiiction and extreme pressure additives, its viscosity and its viscosity - pressure and viscosity - temperature coefficient. During a particular rolling pass the following competing mechanisms are active: • • • • • •
the rate at which the pressure on the lubricant increases; the rate at which the viscosity of the oil increases, leading to lower fiiction; the rate at which the number of contacting asperities grows, leading to higher fiiction; the pressure at which the lubricant layer breaks up, leading to higher fiiction; the relative velocity and the amount of lubricant drawn into the contact region and the orientation of the grooves formed by the asperities, aiding or impeding the spread of the lubricant within the contact zone. MATHEMAHCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERHES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
39 2.3.2
The effect of the velocity
The coefficient offrictiondecreases as the velocity increases (Zhang and Lenard, 1996), at least in the boundary and in the mixed lubrication regimes, defined according to the ratio of the oil fiilm thickness to the asperity height. As shown by the Stribeck diagram, beyond the transition to hydrodynamic lubrication, fiictional resistance increases with relative velocity, caused by the increasing fiictional resistance within the layer of oil, separating the two surfaces. Among others, there are several competmg mechanisms that affect the velocity dependence offiictionalresistance, in the boundary and in the mixed lubricating regimes. One is the potential increase of the resistance of the material as the rate of straining is increased. Another is the availability of less time for the adhesion of the contacting asperities. As well, the increasing oil volume, drawn into the deformation zone affects thefiictionalphenomena. Referring to the data given by Rabmowicz (1995) the relative velocity affects frictional resistance in a very significant manner. Ti sliding on ti at progressively increasing velocity indicates that the coefficient of fiiction decreases as the velocity grows, see Figure 2.15.
10
10"
-3
10""
1 0,-1'
10
1000
sliding velocity, mm/sec
Figure 2.15 The velocity dependence of fiiction when Ti is slidmg against Ti (Rabinowicz, 1995; reproduced with permission) 2.3.3
The effect of the temperature
Of the process parameters, the least researched one is the temperature at the contacting surfaces, no doubt because of the difficulties associated with its measurements. The temperatures at the contacting surfaces should be reported, and while there have been attempts to measure them, they are still rather elusive. Measuring the temperature of the center of the rolled sample using embedded thermocouples has also been done and in that case a mathematical model is needed to estimate the temperature at the surface. The model also TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
40
_^
would require the heat transfer coefficient in the contact zone and that introduces another level of complexity. The heat transfer coefficient and its dependence on the significant process and material parameters will be discussed later. Explicit data on the dependence of the coefficient of friction on temperature, measured in actual situations, are difficult to find. Probably the most comprehensive data are given by Male (1964), who used the ring compression test to measure the coefficient for a number of materials and temperatures. The data indicate that, in general, as the temperature increases so does the coefficient offriction.The deviations from this trend are small and they appear at the high temperature ranges. The data of Devenpeck and Rigo (1983), also obtained in the ring compression test, indicate a very significant dependence of the fiiction factor on the temperature, felt as the effect of the presence or absence of scaling. The authors used a C-Mn steel and a temperature range of 865°C to 880''C. The fiiction factor was found to varyfroma high of 0.915, when dry, scaled surface was present to a low of 0.162, when no scales were present but a lubricant was used. Wang and Lenard (1992), considering hot ring tests, compared the results of Venugopal et al, (1989), Pawleski et al., (1988) to data they produced. Venugopal et al. used ARMCO iron which scaled heavily, as did the steels, employed by Wang and Lenard. Pawelski et al. used a carbon steel as well as a Cr steel. The data obtained show some contradictions. Wang and Lenard (1992) observed that the temperature had no effect on fiiction. Venugopal et al., (1989) found the fiiction factor decreases as the temperature is increased. Pawelski et al., (1988) found that fiiction increased a little with the temperature when the carbon steel was used and that it increased much faster when a steel with low rate of scaling was employed. Data, indicating the temperature dependence offiictionalresistance, have also been given in Wusatowski (1965). The coefficients of fiiction, obtained by matching the measured and calculated roll separating forces, indicate a very strong dependence on the rolling speed, as expected and indicated by others. However, the downward trend is not obeyed at low speeds where there is an increase of the fiictional resistance. It is difficuh to separate the temperature and the speed effects on the coefficient at this point. The data for five different carbon steels (indicated by the numbers, 1 to 5), reproduced m Figure 2.16, below, show that the coefficient of fiiction during hot rolling of steels first rises with increasing temperature, reaches a plateau and falls. The velocity effect on fiiction is also observable in Figure 2.16; as the velocity increases, fiictional resistance decreases. In part a) the roll surface velocity is 3 m/s; in b) it is 2 m/s; in c) it is 1 m/s while in d) it is lowered to 0.5 m/s. As Schey (1983) writes, and as the above review suggests, the effect of temperature on fiiction is a fianction of the condition of the surface, including the presence or absence of lubrication or scaling, its thickness, its behavior - whether brittle or viscoplastic - in addition to the strength of the adhesion of the scale to the parent material. He also points out the fact that much of the information, concerning mostly hot and warm rolling of steel, is contradictory. Rabinowicz (1995) separates the effect of temperature changes, caused by external heating or cooling or by high speed sliding, on the coefficient of fiiction. It is the former case that is applicable here. In the cases presented in (Rabinowicz, 1995) the fiictional coefficient appears to be insensitive to those changes. There are exceptions to this general observation, however. The coefficient of fiiction between stainless steel 304 and nickel, stainless steel and cobalt and graphite and aluminum is shown to be strongly temperature dependent. Evidently, there is a contribution to these changes by material properties. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
41
a)
b) 0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
^i 0.3
'%br
r-1
.2
4-1
r3] M 0.3
\
V
^5 0.2
^
^
0.2
^
'• '•--- •-•
">• 800
1000
800
1200
temperature, "^C
c)
\
»^ . ^
1000
1200
temperature, **C
d) 0.5
0.5
-1
f^
^2-|
0.4
'h • ^i 0.3k^
k
< -4
/-4
r2
0.4
\ \ ^3\ ;$ \
^i 0.3
^
^\
\ \\
0.2
0.2
•
i-,^^
800
1000
1200
temperature, **C
800
1000
1200
temperature, **C
Figure 2.16 The coefficient offriction,inferred while hot rolling five carbon steels at different temperatures and roll surface velocities (Wusatowski, 1965; reproduced with permission) Evidently, the effect of the temperature on the magnitude of the coefficient of fiiction in hot rolling should not be separated from other phenomena. Chemical composition, scale TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
42
breakers, time in the furnace, etc. should be taken into account when the coefficient is chosen for modeling. 2.3.4 The effect of the surface roughness Figure 2.17 shows the variation of the coefficient of friction as a function of the RMS roughness, in microinches (Rabinowicz, 1995). The author's conclusion is that except in the case of very low and very high surface roughness, friction is independent of the surface roughness. The same conclusion is reached by Booser (1984) who writes .. ."surface roughness has little or no consistent effect on the coefficient of friction of clean, dry surfaces. "...Current results appear to contradict this conclusion, no doubt because of the lack of clean, dry surfaces in practice. 1.5
"n
\—
\
copper on copper unlubricated L=1000g, u=0.1 mm/sec
2
o
"0
I.Oi
0.5
L
'a
friction ^ ^ affected by grovyrth of real contact area
\
L
5
10
friction constant
20
^ ^ friction \ affected by asperity interlocl
50
100
RMS roughness, microinches
Figure 2.17 The coefficient of friction as a function of the surface roughness (Rabinowicz, 1995; reproduced with permission) 2.3.5
The efTect of scaling
Scale in Hot Rolling: Primary scale forms when the slabs are soaked prior to rolling. Secondary scale forms randomly at the workpiece/roll interface, as the two surfaces are in contact, but also in-between stands in thefinishingtrain. Inter-stand scale breakers are used to minimize the amount of secondary scale in the roll gap. However, a certain amount of scale will always create a layer between the rolls and the workpiece. The presence of scale in roUing can, hypothetically, have two opposite effiscts. Scale could, if soft and ductile enough, serve as lubrication or, if hard and abrasive, serve as an abrasive medium in a three-body wear mechanism. Shaesby et al. (1984) investigated the morphology of the scale formed on the surface of a low carbon steel at 1200''C, reporting FeO : Fe304 : Fe203 ratios of 95:4:1, consistent with the information reported by others (Mrowec and Przybylski, 1977). Birks and Meier (1983) attributed this fact to the greater mobility of defects in wustite. Matsuno (1980) MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
43
studied blistering and hydraulic removal of relatively thin scale films on AISI1008 steel. It was reported that the scale consisted of wiistite to the greatest extent, followed by magnetite and haematite, independent of the temperature. Effect of scale on friction: El-Kalay and Sparling (1968) were among the first to mvestigate the effect of scale on fiictional conditions in hot rolling of low carbon steel. Different conditions were studied in a laboratory: light, medium, and heavy scaling with both smooth and rough rolls at various velocities. Load and torque fiinctions, according to Sims' equations, were calculated for these conditions. It was hypothesized that the scale acts as a poor lubricant and that its effect on the fnctional conditions varies along the arc of contact as it fi-actures. It was found that the presence of scale could reduce the roll loads by as much as 25%. A thick scale reduced the loads more than a thin scale since the thick scale breaks up into islands that transmit the load from the rolls to the strip. The islands become separated as the strip is elongated. Hot metal then extrudes between the islands and sticks to the rolls while the sliding islands move further apart and promote tensions applied to the sticking portion, thereby reducing the load. It was also found that thin scale promotes sliding fiiction with smooth rolls, but sticking friction with rough rolls. The load fiinctions increased with temperature in rolling with rough rolls, but decreased with temperature for smooth rolls. Roberts (1983) used the data of El-Kalay and Sparling (1968) to empirically model the coefficient of friction in terms of scale thickness, roll roughness, temperature. The model predicts an increase in the coefficient of friction with increasing roll surface roughness, decrease in scale thickness or increased temperature. Luong and Heijkoop (1981) studied the effect of scale on friction in hot forging, using the ring test technique. Altering fiimace atmosphere and heating times varied the scale composition and thickness in the investigations on carbon steel. The furnace atmosphere consisted of CO2, O2, or air, and the heating times rangedfi-omeight to 240 minutes. Longer heating times resuhed in greater amounts of wustite. It was found that the friction factor and as a result, the coefficient of fiiction decreased with increasing scale thickness. The effect of the composition of the scale could not be related to the overall fnctional conditions. Li and Sellars (1996) found that sticking friction takes place in hot forging of scaled low cari)on steel, but a certain degree of forward slipping, indicating partly or completely sliding friction, occurs in the rolling of the same material. Comments, similar to Blazevic's (1996), were made on the breakup of the scale. They found a limited number of cracks on specimens with thin scale. A scale layer can follow a similar reduction and elongation as the steel only if its hot strength is equal to or lower than that of the hot steel. Schunke et al. (1988) presented a hypothesis on the effect of partial oxygen pressure on fiiction coefficients at room temperature, although additional information for temperatures below 600°C were presented for various Fe alloys. While analyzing data obtained by other researchers they found that the coefficient of friction during sliding was dependent on the partial pressure of oxygen as well as the sliding length. Generally, the coefficient of fiiction decreased with increased oxygen pressure and temperature, as these cause an oxide layer to grow more rapidly on the surface. The drop in friction was explained as follows: the oxide particles arefi-agmentedwhen deformed and become further oxidized and compacted onto the metal surfaces where they form islands in the next cycle. When these islands grow in area a large portion of the shearing is at these islands, causing the total contact area to be reduced. Friction is then lowered because of the brittle nature of the oxide particles that are being TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
44 sheared. Shaw et al (1995) determined fracture energies of oxide-metal and oxide-silicide interfaces. It was concluded that the fracture energy depends primarily on interfacial bond strength, although roughness of the interface, microstructure of the compounds, and porosity also have some effect.
2.4
ROLL WEAR
Czichos' (1983) comments are valid at this time as well. He estimates that nearly 30% of the energy generated in the industrialized world is consumed by friction and that the losses form a significant portion of the gross national product. While he estimates 1-2% of the GNP is lost because of friction and wear, Rabinowicz (1982) gave the much higher figure of 6%. The recent review "Tribology in Materials Processing" by Batchelor and Stachowiak (1995) underlines these concerns, and suggests that the costs begin when the ore is extracted from the ground. Quoting Nakano et al. (1990), they define wear and friction, and hence tribology, as chaotic processes in which predictions are not possible. They state categorically that an analytical approach to wear is impossible. There appears to be agreement with this view in the technical literature. For example, a few years earlier. Barber (1991), considering a tribological system, wrote that accurate pointwise simulation of such a system is inconceivable at the present time. The author continued to describe a caricature of a tribological research paper, commenting on the complexities of the physical system and the need for assumptions in the mathematical model. The opinions of Barber should be taken very seriously. He is absolutely correct in writing that predictions of models, without adequate experimental data supporting those predictions, are of little value. One possible addition to that sentence may be to request experimenters to compare their measurements to the predictions of models. In this way, the accuracy of the models' assumptions may be determined. In spite of these comments, the relation, given by Roberts (1983), to estimate the change in the radius of a work roll, is found to be useful. The ratio of the change in the roll radius, AR, and the rolled length, A, is given by:
K^I} ra exp AR A
D\
HL
h^i?-r)\
1 (2.27)
^roll
where K is the wear constant, L is the contact length, r is the reduction in decimals and <j and a^11 are the flow strength of the strip and roll, respectively. While the wear constant is not easy to determine exactly (Roberts, 1983, gives some further data on K), the formula gives realistic numbers for the loss of roll radius. Letting K = 8x10"^ the coefficient of friction equal to 0.4, the roll diameter equal to 400 mm, 40% reduction, the flow strength of the strip as 250 MPa, and that of the roll to be 600 MPa, the loss of the roll radius, after 100 strips of 1000 m length each, is estimated to be 7 mm, a reasonable number. Batchelor and Stachowiak (1995) also discuss the mechanisms of friction and wear. Mechanisms of wear, shown in Figure 2.18, include abrasive, fatigue, erosive, cavitation^ and adhesive wear. Abrasive wear is caused by the ploughing action between the contacting MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
45
asperities. Erosive wear is the result of impact of solid or liquid particles. Repeated contact causes fatigue wear and liquid droplet erosion causes cavitational wear. Concerning friction, they write that the most common cause is elastic and plastic deformation of the asperities of the contacting surfaces. The authors rank solid state adhesion as the second most common cause of friction, causing very high coefficients of friction. Viscous drag is identified as the third cause of friction, resuhing in lowfrictionalresistance, that is, hydrodynamic lubrication. These mechanisms are illustrated in Figure 2.19, below. abrasive wear direction of abrasive grit
direction of abrasive grit oracles
grit 5
grain puiiout
direction of abrasive grit ^at'Que
^^^^^^^^
direction of abrasive grit
repeated deformations by subsequent grits
grain about to detach
b) erosive wear high angle of impingement
02
low angle of impingement
1
5
fatigue
c) cavitation wear
movement of liquid
collapsing bubble • Impact of solid and liquid
deformation or fracture of solids resulting in wear
Figure 2.18 Mechanisms of wear (Batchelor and Stachowiak, 1995; reproduced with permission) TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
46 asperity of harder surface or trapped wear particle VISCOUS DRAG
PLOUGHING
shearing of film material body 1"^ motion/ wave of material plastically deformed layer ADHESION
vivi^nn^: ;•: viv.vPy-— fjim material body 2
^u . .. ^. adhesive bonding
deformed asperity/^ bodyl . motion
Figure 2.19 Mechanisms offriction(Batchelor and Stachowiak, 1995; reproduced with permission )
Fitzpatrick (1998) defines the three phenomena that occur between two contacting surfaces that control the wear process, regardless of what mechanisms are causing the wear (Suh, 1978). These are: • • •
the chemical and physical interactions of the surface with lubricants and other constituents of the environment; the transmission of forces at the interface through asperities and loose wear particles; and the response of a given pair of solid materials to the forces at the surface.
These phenomena are not independent and any changes to these aspects have a dramatic effect on wear and wear rates. The author further lists and defines the important types of wear, expanding on the list of Batchelor and Stachoviak (1995). Adhesive wear results when the contacting surfaces form bonds between the asperities. Fatigue wear is caused by repeated application of the loads. Abrasive wear is observed when hard particles come in contact with the surface under load. Tribochemical reactions at the surfaces cause chemical wear. Hard, solid particles, causing impact, result in erosion. Similar to this is impact wear, occurring when the two surfaces come in contact under impact conditions. Finally,frettingwear is found when the contact surfaces experiences oscillation with small displacements in the tangential direction. Previous studies show that roll wear rates are highest at temperatures of 850 - 950°C, precisely the temperatures used in the finishing stands of hot strip mills. Roll wear is also a function of the specific load, sliding length, and abrasive and corrosive particles in the cooling water. The low speeds of the roughing stands cause most of the wear and slippage as a result MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
47 of too low friction also causes excessive roll wear. The parameters are many and the complex problem can be caused by either excessive or diminishing friction.
2.5
CASE STUDIES
Experimental data, recently developed in the Manufacturing Processes Laboratory at the University of Waterloo, will be reviewed. The tests concern hot and cold rolling of steels and aluminum and they are included because the information may be useftil when the problems associated with tribology of hot strip rolling of steels are analyzed. The tests were conducted on two rolling mills, one used in the cold rolling processes, the other reserved for high temperatures. A two-high mill, with 249.8 mm diameter by 150 nmi long, D2 tool steel rolls, hardened to Re = 63 and having a surface roughness of Ra = 0.2 jim, was used in the cold rolling tests. The mill was instrumented to measure the roll separating forces, the roll torques, the forward slip, the roll speed, the temperature and the roll gap. The screwdown was operated by two hydraulic cylinders, under closed loop control. The hot rolling experiments were performed on a two-high, Stanat mill with a permissible load of 800 kN. The tool steel rolls were of 150 mm diameter. The surface roughness, obtained by sandblasting, was 0.8 jim. 2.5.1
Cold rolling of steel with lubricants
Cold rolled strips of 0.05% C steel were rolled, having a true stress - true strain curve: (7 = 150(1 + 234^)°''^ MPa, obtained in uniaxial tension. Six oils were used as lubricants. The oils were introduced in solid form, not as emulsions. The coefficients of friction were calculated by a model, the accuracy and consistency of which have been demonstrated elsewhere (Lenard and Zhang, 1996), by matching the roll force, roll torque and the forward slip. The details of the six oils used are, as follows. Oil A (5591-67-1) was a forming and cutting oil, called Exxcut 225, prepared with petroleum base oils, sulfiirized hydrocarbons, fats and esters as the additives, v^th a viscosity of 23 cSt at 40 °C. Oil B (591-67-2) was identical to oil A, containing no additives, however. Oil C (5591-67-3) was again the same as A, containing only one additive, a lubricity contributing ester. Oil D (5591-67-4) was a commercial cutting oil 1033A, a highly sulfiirized petroleum based oil of low viscosity. Oil E (5591-68-1) was a commercial rolling oil, known as Roll Oil 981, a petroleum based oil of low viscosity, containing small amounts of esters as additives. Oil F (5591-68-2) was a hydrocarbon synthetic lubricant with no additives. Its viscosity was similar to that of oil A. The viscosity and the density of the lubricants are given in Table 2.4. It would be helpful at this point of the pressure - viscosity and the temperature - viscosity coefficients were available for the lubricants, especially if the objective was to plot the Stribeck curve. The data was not available, however, and conclusions, regarding the nature of the lubricating regime were drawn from other sources of information. TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
48 Table 2.4 The properties of the lubricants Lubricant Kinematic viscosity {cSt@40°C)
Density (g/cc)
A
23
0.87
B
19-21
0.86
C
19-21
0.86
D
14
0.88
E
6
0.85
F
NA
NA
Roll forces, roll torque and the forward slip were measured, using the six lubricants, as a function of the roll velocity and the reduction. The roll forces drop as the speed was increased, reflecting the time-dependent nature of the development of fnctional resistance. As expected, the roll forces increased with increasing reduction. The roll torques indicated the same kind of behavior. No large dependence on the lubricant was observed. The speed dependence was somewhat less than observed for the roll forces. Again, lubricant F produced the lowest torques. The variation of the forward slip vs. the roll surface velocity and for a range of reductions, for each of the six oils, however, did not follow the trends of the roll force and torque. As the roll speed was increased the forward slip fost decreased somewhat, increased to a plateau and then dropped to low magnitudes. Negative forward slip was also observed, indicating that under certain conditions reaching the hydrodynamic lubricating regime is possible. The coefficient of friction was determined by either an empirical formula or by matching the measured and calculated parameters. Three methods were followed. The simplest makes use of the equation of Hill. The computed coefficients of friction for each of the lubricants are given in Figures 2.20 to 2.25. The trends were similar for all six oils. The coefficient of friction reduced as the speed and the reduction were increased. As before, the lowest coefficient of friction was obtained with lubricant F and the highest with D. The differences among the lubricants were not large. In the second method, the measured and calculated roll force and the roll torque were matched and the coefficients of fiiction that yielded the best results were then identified. The details of the one-dimensional model used in the computations have been published (Roychoudry and Lenard, 1984). This model combines the equation of equilibrium with an exact analysis of the elastic regions and a two-dimensional treatment of roll flattening. The traditional approach of integrating for the roll pressure is followed; the integration begins at entry, using the appropriate initial condition and a roll pressure distribution was obtained. Then, the equation is integrated from the exit and the neutral point is located at the intersection of the two curves. Since the calculations are time-consuming they are performed for lubricants A and F only. The results are shown in Figures 2.26 and 2.27. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
_ ^
49
These may be compared to those given in Figure 2.20 for lubricant A and to Figure 2.25 for lubricant F. The similarities and differences are immediately apparent. First to notice was that the magnitudes of the coefficients of friction are much smaller than those obtained by Hill's formula. In that case, as in the present, friction with oil A was higher than with F. The computations with Hill's formula indicated a drop of about 18 - 22%; the same with the more refined model indicated a drop of up to 35%. Initially, the trends are similar in that the coefficients drop as the speed was increased with both models. As well fiictional resistance decreases with increasing reductions. Using lubricant F and considering the highest speed of 2400 mm/s, however, the picture changes, and the increasing reductions produce higher fiictional resistance, a result that was not observed with Hill's formula. It may be noted here that the accuracy of the inferred coefficients of friction depends, in a very significant manner, on the rigor of the mathematical model, used in the calculations. The ratios of the measured to calculated values of the roll forces and torques are given in Figure 2.28, showing that the model was reasonably accurate in its predictions. The forces are computed to within a few percent and the torques indicate that approximately 20% more was needed to drive the mill than was necessary to produce plastic flow. As expected from the adhesion hypothesis, fiictional resistance decreases with increasing rolling speeds and the reduction. When rolling soft aluminum, fiictional resistance increased with reduction (Karagiozis and Lenard, 1985) a phenomenon which occurs because of the ease with which aluminum oxides adhere to the roll surfaces during the process. During rolling of harder aluminum alloys, such as the 6061 type, fiiction appears to behave much as the present low carbon steel. Both oils produced at most a mixed mode of lubrication, indicated by the diminishing fiiction at higher velocities. It was surprising to see lower values of fiiction with oil 0.50
0.40 H c o t5
Nominal reduction + 15% o 27% n 35% A 50%
0.50
0.40g
is
£ 0.30 "5
£
0.30 H
«
o SE
0.20-
0.20 H
0.10
0.10(Lubricant B j
[ LubricantX)
0.00
[ Nominal reduction' + 15% o 27% D 35% I A 50% J
—T" 1000 1500 2000 500 roll surface speed (mnn/s)
0.00 2500
Figure 2.20 The coefficient of fiiction as a fimction of the speed and reduction - oil A
— I 1 1 1 — 500 1000 1500 2000 roil surface speed (mm/s)
2500
Figure 2.21 The coefficient of fiiction as a fimction of the speed and reduction - oil B
TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
50 0.50
0.50 Nominal reduction' + 15% o 27% D 35% A 50%
0.40
£
0.30
5^ 0.20 H
Nominal reduction] + 15% o 27% n 35% [ A 50% J
0.40
£
0.30
o
0.20
0.10
0.10 H (Lubricantp)
(Lubricantc] 0.00
—I
1
0.00
\—
1
500 1000 1500 2000 roll surface speed (mm/s)
500 1000 1500 2000 roll surface speed (mm/s)
2500
Figure 2.22 The coeflBcient of friction as a function of the speed and the reduction - oil C
2500
Figure 2.23 The coefficient of friction as afrinctionof the speed and the reduction - oil D
F, a synthetic lubricant, containing no additives, than with A. The opposite conclusion was reached in (Zhang and Lenard, 1996) where the lowestfrictionalresistance was obtained when the appropriate additives were used. The need for a systematic study of the effects of additives on the mill loads is clearly indicated. 0.50
0.40
A
o
0.50
Nominal reduction + 15% o 27% D 35%
50%
0.40
J
is 'S 0.30
£ 0.30 "5
jg 0.20
^
0.10
0.20
0.10 H (Lubricant F j
(Lubricant E ] 0.00
Nominal reduction] + 15% O 27% a 35% A 50%
—1 1 \ \ 500 1000 1500 2000 roll surface speed (mm/s)
0.00 2500
Figure 2.24 The coefficient of friction as a function of the speed and the reduction - oil E
—1 1 1 1— 500 1000 1500 2000 roll surface speed (mm/s)
2500
Figure 2.25 The coefficient of friction as a function of the speed and the reduction - oil F
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
51
0.16
0.16Nominal reduction + 15% o 27% D 35%
0.12
A
50%
0.12
J
( LubricantFJ
g
Nominal reduction + 15% o 27% D 35% A
50%
J
£ o ^
l o . 08
0.08
0)
1
o !E
S
0.04
0.04
(LubricantA) 0.00
—r
~r
~r
500 1000 1500 2000 roll surface speed (mm/s)
0.00 2500
Figure 2.26 The coeflBcient of friction calculated by Roychoudhury and Lenard (1984), - oil A
0
—^ ^ 1 I 500 1000 1500 2000 roll surface speed (mm/s)
2500
Figure 2.27 The coefficient of friction calculated by Roychoudhury and Lenard (1984)-oil F
2.00
1.50
->
?
1.00
Roll forces, lubricant A Roll forces, lubricant F Roll torque, lubricant A Roll torque, lubricant F
0.50
0.00 0
a A o ^
1 \ 1 1— 2500 500 1000 1500 2000 roll surface speed (mm/s)
Figure 2.28 The accuracy of the computations; lubricants A and F Further computations were performed to test how the choice of the model may affect the results. The objective was to match not only the measured and calculated forces and torques but the forward slip as well. In what follows, the model was described briefly first. An extended version of the mathematical model of the flat rolling process, developed by Roychoudhury and Lenard (1984), was used in the present study. The model was based on the original technique of Orowan (1943). Assuming that planes remain planes, the roll gap was divided TRIBOLOGYOFFLATROLUNGAND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
52
_ _ — .
into slabs and the equation of equilibrium was integrated for each slab. Assembling the slabs leads to the roll pressure and in turn, to the roll separating force and roll torque. Additional steps include the use of the theory of elasticity to analyze the elastic entry and exit regions of the rolled strip and the integration of the biharmonic equation to account for the deformation of the work roll. As was well known, Orowan's model uses thefrictionhill, in which the location of the neutral point was obtained at the intersection of the roU pressure curves, extendingfromentry and exit. In the present refinement, only one equation of equilibrium was employed. An assumption for the variation of the coefficient offrictionin the roll gap was made with some guidancefromprevious experience. This assumption includes the location of the neutral point. The equation of equilibrium was then integrated, starting with the known initial condition at the entry. Satisfaction of the boundary condition at exit drives the iterative process. (The full details of the model are given below, in Chapter 4 "One-dimensional Models of the Flat Rolling Process") .The results are shown in Figure 2.29, for lubricant A and 50% nominal reduction. 0.25
2.00 Lubricant A Nominal reduction = 50"
J
0.20 t5
n
0.15
Model + Coldraj O Hill [ D varying friction
5 ^ 1 g 0)
In the nr^odel the coefficient of friction] varies from entry to exit 1.50
1.00
0.10 0.50
0.05
0.00
0.00 500 1000 1500 2000 roll surface speed (mm/s)
2500
Figure 2.29 The coefficient of friction, calculated by three methods - oil A, 50% reduction
Lubricant A Nominal reduction = 50% + roll force O roll torque A forward slip "T T" T" 500 1000 1500 2000 roll surface speed (mm/s)
2500
Figure 2.30 The accuracy of the onedimensional model
The data obtained using Hill's formula, indicated by the diamonds, and with the first model, designated by the squares, are also included. The crosses show the current values of the coefficient of friction. The message is clear: the inferred values of the coefficient of friction are strongly dependent on which model is used. The trends are similar in most of the cases and if relative magnitudes are wanted. Hill's formula is completely adequate. If more exact results, that are to be used in the predictive-adaptive scheme of the mill, are needed, a model that allows matching the roll force, the torque and the forward slip may be necessary. The accuracy of the last set of calculations is shown in Figure 2.30, indicating results similar to that given in Figure 2.28. Again, the roll forces, as measured and predicted, are close, as are most of the forward slip values. The torque needed to cause plastic deformation is about 20% lower than the experimental data, indicating the magnitude of the losses in the drive train. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
53 2.5.2
Cold roUing of aluminum with lubricants
One mm thick, 25 mm wide 1100 H14 aluminum alloy strips were rolled using the two-high mill, described above (Lenard and Zhang, 1996). SAE 5 lubricant, with no additives, was used for lubrication. After cleaning the strips using n-heptane, a neutral cleaner, 10 drops of the lubricant was put on each side of the strip. The oil was then spread carefixlly and evenly on the surfaces. The roll separating forces, roll torques and the forward slip were measured for a range of reductions arid rolling speeds. The mathematical model, referred to above and given in detail in Chapter 4, was used to infer the magnitudes of the coefficient of friction. The results of the computations with the proposed model are given in terms of the calculated and measured roll forces, torques and forward slip, in Figure 2.31. The facility of the model was evident in the figure. All three parameters are predicted with good accuracy, provided the coefficient of friction was chosen with care. In general, the measured roll torques are larger than the computed values, as before. The proper choice of the coefficient of friction in the mathematical model led to the data given in Figure 2.31, indicating that the ratios of all three of the computed and measured parameters are consistent. The magnitudes of the coefficient may therefore be considered to be quite accurate, since they are based on matching all three parameters. 0.15 + Roll force o Roll torque A Fonvard slip
1.60-
8
1.20-
0.80-
o
-^:
i*l-
0.10 H > o
. g - " x . ,^ i
o 0.05
1100-H14 Aluminum SAE 5 lubricant 6 - 4 0 rpm rolling speed 10-60% reduction
0.40-
n nn
1
1 1 8 12 test number
1 16
0.00 20
Figure 2.31 The accuracy of the model 1100 H14 aluminum was rolled (Zhang and Lenard, 1997; reproduced with permission)
20.0 40.0 reduction (%)
60.0
Figure 2.32 The coeflScient of friction; 1100 HI4 aluminum (Zhang and Lenard, 1997; reproduced with permission)
The values of the coefficient are plotted in Figure 2.32, for a range of rolling speeds, against the reduction, for the strips lubricated with the SAE 5 oil. The experiments with the light oil indicate values of the coefficient of friction that are as expected. In general, the magnitudes increase with increasing reductions and decrease with increasing speeds. The velocity TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
54
dependence was not linear. At the lower speeds the coefficient was not highly sensitive to changes. At higher speeds a large drop in magnitudes was found, beyond which no more significant changes were demonstrated. Extending the speed range would certainly lead to a better appreciation of the effect of relative velocity. There was an exception to the load dependence offriction,demonstrated at 10 rpm, where \i appeared to drop with the reduction. However, the drop was not large and was not considered to change the general conclusions. The speed and load effects became much more dominant at higher velocities. The magnitudes of the coefficient offrictionvariedfroma low of 0.025 to a high of 0.12.
0.15
•
•
•
•
•
I 0-10
§ o
0.05-
1100-H14 Aluminum SAE 5 lubricant 5-40 rpm 10-50% reduction
0.00 i.OOE-ll
•
1
1
1
I
1
1
« l l
l.OOE-10
1
1 1 1 Mll|
l.OOE-9
1 1 1 I1I I 1
l.OOE-8
Figure 2.33 The Stribeck curve, obtained while cold rolling 1100 H14 aluminum with SAE 5 (Zhang and Lenard, 1997; reproduced with permission)
The Stribeck curve: Using the values of \x, determined above, the Stribeck curve was given in Figure 2.33. In calculating the Sommerfeld number, the lubricant's dynamic viscosity should be corrected for the effects of the pressure and the temperature. The formula used in the present case was a variation of the one employed by Sa and Wilson (1994). In the computations the pressureviscosity coefficient was taken to be 0.0217 MPa"^. No specific data for the temperature-viscoaty coefficient was available and its magnitude was taken to be 0.03 K'^ (Booser, 1984). The mean roll pressure was obtained by dividing roll separating force by the projected contact area. The temperature of the oil was assumed to be identical to the average strip temperature during the pass. In plotting the Stribeck curve, its sensitivity to various values of the two coefficients was found to be low. The Stribeck curve confirms the conclusions drawnfromthe calculated oil-film thickness. Using the SAE 5 oil, the lubricating regime just enters the mixed range. When a metal is rolled, the mill loads - that is, the roll separating forces and the roll torques - increase with increasing reduction. The majority of research studies indicate that as the MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
J5 reduction is increased, the coefficient of friction grows when aluminum is rolled (Lim and Lenard, 1984; Karagiozis and Lenard, 1985), and decreases when steel is rolled (Lin et al., 1991). The tendency to transfer aluminum oxide to the rolls is expected to be the cause for the apparent contradiction. 2.5.3
Hot rolling of low carbon steel (Laboratory data)
AISI 1018 (0.19% C, 0.7% Mn) carbon steel slabs were used in all experiments. The steel was delivered in the form of cold rolled bars. The samples were machined to 12.7 mm thickness, 50.8 mm width and 305 mm length. Three reductions were investigated! 10, 20, and 30% at temperatures from 825°C to 1125°C. The roll speed was 25 rpm in all experiments, giving a roll surface velocity of 196 mm/s. The specimens were rolled with the scale which acted both as an insulator and as a lubricant during the rolling operation, even though it was eventually broken off. Each experiment was repeated three to five times and average values of the roll separating forces, roll torques and the forward slip were reported. A rigid-plastic finite element model, presented in (Pietrzyk and Lenard, 1991), was used to correlate the measured values of the forward slip and the coefficient of friction. Shida's equations (1971), which give the steel's resistance to deformation in terms of the strain, rate of strain, the temperature and the carbon content, are used for estimation of the mean plane-strain flow stress. In the calculations, the magnitude of the coefficient of friction was inferred by matching the measured and calculated values of the forward slip, roll force and torque. The results are given in Figure 2.34.
0.28 Nominal reduction + 10% 20% 0 D 30%
0.24 H
£
0.20 H
S
0.16 H
t
0.12 0.08 800
900 1000 1100 entry surfg.ce temperature (°C)
1200
Figure 2.34 The coefficient of fiiction inferred, using a two dimensional finite element model, during hot rolling of a low carbon steel (Munther and Lenard, 1995; reproduced with permission)
TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
J6 The data indicate that the coefficient of fhction drops as the temperature of the rolled sample increases, clearly contradicting the information provided by Wusatoski (1969). The trend of the present data follow that of Geleji. As well, the magnitudes of the coefficient of friction are significantly lower than indicated by others. Further, they are far from the sticking friction, usually assumed to exist in hot rolling situations. These changes are generally thought to be the result of the mathematical models used in the inverse calculations. In previous studies, only the roll separating forces were matched and an empirical formula or at most a simple one-dimensional model, was used. In producing the data below, an advanced model and three parameters were matched. The current results on the coefficient of friction therefore are expected to be closer to realistic magnitudes. 2.5.4
Hot rolling of steel (Industrial data)
Data obtained from the logbooks of Dofasco Inc. were utilized in order to gain an insight into the magnitudes of the coeflScient of friction on the stands of the finishing train of an industrial hot strip mill. Low carbon steel was rolled. The necessary data concerning the chemical composition of the steel, the thickness at each stand, the reduction, the temperature, the roll speed and the roll radius, were taken from the logbooks. The empirical formula of Ekelund, given for cold rolling, was adapted for use in the hot rolling process (see Eq. 2.3).
0.5 o
0.4
pi
ti ^ 0.3
low carbon steel Dofasco's#2 hot strip mill
0^
)0 0
o
Q> O
£ o
"
^ ^
0 ^ v ^ _ ^
"c
0.2 0.1 0 0
0
F1-F6
• average i__
_ i — ^
1
2
.
1
3
4
(heat transfer x temperature)/ (flow stress x relative velocity)
Figure 2.35 The coefficient of friction, calculated by Ekelund's formula, using industrial logbooks (Munther, 1997)
The results are given in Figure 2.35. The coefficient of friction is plotted on the ordinate while a group of variables, involving the heat transfer coeflBcient, the temperature, the metal's flow stress and the relative velocity, is shown on the abscissa. The observations indicate that MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
as the temperature increases, frictional resistance decreases. This result confirms the conclusions obtained from data, produced in the laboratory. The coefficient of friction in the hot rolling process is found to be significantly less than believed in the past. 2.5.5
Hot rolling of commercially pure aluminum
Specific resuhs on the measurements of friction during dry or lubricated, hot rolling of aluminum using cold steel rolls are not easy to find. Among the few publications was the work of Atack and Abbott (1986) who concluded that sticking friction does not exist when hot rolling aluminum alloys. As well, the authors believe that accurate predictions of the roll forces require accurate knowledge of the frictional coefficient. The ring test was used to evaluate the friction factor by Bugini et al., (1978) while Lang (1984) measured frictional forces during hot extrusion of aluminum. The dependence of the roll separating forces, roll torques, forward slip, interfacial normal and shear stresses, and therefore the coefficient of friction, on the reduction have been measured and reported at nominal temperatures of 22, 100, 300 and 500°C (Malinowski and Lenard, 1993; Hum, Colquhoun and Lenard, 1996). The actual surface temperatures of the strips during the pass were calculated using an elastic-plastic finite element model of the process. The measured values of the interfacial stresses are substantiated independently and are found to be reasonable. The magnitudes of the coefficient of friction, measured using the pintransducer combination, are given in Figure 2.36 at a nominal temperature of 500°C and at various rolling speeds. A water - oil emulsion was used during the tests. The results show that the coefficient of friction falls as the rolling speed was increased and it increases when the reduction was increased.
0.50
50
100 150 roll speed (rpm)
200
250
Figure 2.36 The coefficient of friction, measured during hot rolling of commercially pure aluminum strips (Hum, Colquhoun and Lenard, 1996; reproduced with permission) TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
5S
_^
The magnitudes of the coefficient of friction, measured using the pin-transducer combination, are given in Figure 2.36 at a nominal temperature of 500°C and at various rolling speeds. A water-oil emulsion was used during the tests. The results show that the coefficient of friction falls as the speed is increased and it increases when the reduction is increased. 2.5.6
Roll wear in a plate mill
Roll wear was investigated for one of the thick plate rolling mills. Typical results obtained for one campaign of work rolls of the finishing stand are presented in Figure 2.37 (Dyja et al., 1998). 1950 tons of plates were rolled during this campaign. The upper roll diameter was 985.8 mm and the lower roll, 987.8 mm. The production campaign contained alloy and carbon steel plates with the thickness 8 or 10 mm, in the following proportions: 5% of the plates were low carbon steel plates of 3100 mm width, 30% were microalloyed steel plates of 2500 mm width, 55% were carbon steel plates with the width of 2200 - 2400 mm and 10% were microalloyed steel plates with the width of 650 mm. The order of rolling was from the widest to the narrowest plates.
0.40
^
n = 1749
2000
Figure 2.37 Changes of the shape of the roll for the finishing stand during one campaign of the rolls; n designates the number of passes. (Dyja et al., 1988; reproduced with permission)
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
59 The results indicate that, as expected, the rolls wear most near the center, where the roll pressures are the highest. Both the lower and the upper roll loose material at approximately the same rates. The rate of roll wear is approximately as indicated by the formula from the text of Roberts (Roberts, 1983), see Eq. 2.27.
2.6 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS The thermal and mechanical boundary conditions are shown in Figure 2.38, illustrating the deformation zone in the flat rolling process. As indicated, these include heat losses and heat gains, caused by various mechanical and metallurgical events. It follows that if appropriate mathematical representation of the boundary conditions was contemplated, the coefficients of heat transfer and of friction are to be expressed as functions of the material and process parameters.
(Heat loss to air]
Insulated boundary
Heat loss to the roll Heat gain from [frictional forces
Heat gain from plastic work and metallurgical events
[Heat loss to air] insulated boundary
(Symmetry)
Figure 2.38 The thermal and mechanical boundary conditions in the flat rolling process
In the mathematical models (see Chapter 4, dealing with one-dimensional models and Chapter 5, describing the use of the finite-element technique) these events - fHction and heat transfer - are to be given in terms, usable by the models. Further, the rigor of their formulation should correspond to the rigor of the model of the process. In an ideal situation which would satisfy mathematicians and physicists, one would list, in some functional form, all parameters and variables that afifect the two coefficients. In a practical situation, constant magnitudes for both suffice, making use of the best available information. The exception is the formula of Wankhede and Samarasekera (1997) for the coefficient of heat transfer in terms of the pressure, to be used when hot rolling strips or plates. A compromise is suggested, even though not all the instruments and information are available at the present time to fully justify the suggestion. Following on the hypothesis that surface interactions, such as the transfer of thermal and mechanical energy at the contact surface are dependent mostly on the interfacial pressure, temperature and the relative velocity, equations, giving specific relations, should be developed. TRIBOLOGY OF FLAT ROLLING AND THE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
60
_^
The form of these equations should be established using the well-developed techniques of dimensional analysis. Obtaining the dimensionless groups of parameters, non-linear regression analysis may be employed to obtain the constants and exponents of the equations. An alternative approach is suggested, as well. Having sufficient number of data points, necessary for the development of the empirical relations suggested above, one may consider the use of artificial neural networks (see Chapter 9 for details and case studies). These techniques are used with increasing frequency in the manufacturing industry. Their advantages, including their flexibility, and ease of handling, overcome the usual objections of engineers, used to having an equation with which predictions may be made: neural networks don't reveal the details of the relationships among the inputs and the outputs. They simply give the predictions. In many instances that may well be completely adequate.
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
6]^
Chapter 3 The Resistance of the Material to Deformation Mathematical models of metal forming processes include several components, some of which are based on natural laws, while others depend on observation, experimentation, measurements, interpretation and modeling. Among the first are the equations of motion or equilibrium, based on Newton's laws. These, when combined with the relations fi'om the theory of elasticity and plasticity, lead to the formulation of the general mathematical model of the behavior of the plastically flowing workpiece and the elastically deforming tool. Solutions of the resulting family of partial or ordinary differential and algebraic equations are, of course, subject to boundary and initial conditions. Boundary conditions, describing the transfer of heat and forces at the contact zone, have been discussed in Chapter 2. Initial conditions, which define the behavior of the workpiece before and during forming - the material's resistance to deformation - define the contents of the present chapter. In what follows, the mechanical behavior as a function of the strain, the rate of strain, the chemical composition and the temperature will be discussed. Testing techniques will be described and their advantages and disadvantages are given. The resuhs of the tests - the true stress - true strain curves - are examined and empirical, mathematical models are presented which allow further use of the data.
3.1
TENSION, TORSION AND COMPRESSION TESTING
The objectives of the tests are twofold. The first is to obtain information which may be used to analyze the elastic-plastic flow of the metal during the rolling process. The usual approach is to develop true stress - true strain curves of the material, under constant strain rate and constant temperature conditions and to develop a mathematical model of its resistance to deformation which can be included in the solution for the process variables. The strains are to be high enough to allow a direct comparison of the metals' behavior in the tests with those exhibited in the actual process. The second objective is to simulate the material's behavior in the actual process; in rolling this implies multi-stage testing with the strains, strain rates and temperatures controlled very carefiiUy. Uniaxial tension, torsion and compression of axially symmetrical or plane samples are the traditional experiments. 3.1.1
Tension testing
These are the easiest and simplest to perform, using samples of cylindrical or rectangular cross-sections. The advantages are that •
there are no fiictional problems to be considered; and
62 •
the tests are governed by ASTM codes so inter-laboratory variability is minimized.
The disadvantages indicate that tension testing is not the most suitable when the information gathered is to be used to study metal forming processes. They are as follows: • • •
low strains are possible, at most 40-50%; the uniaxial nature of the stress distribution is lost when localized straining begins; and in order to keep the rate of strain constant, increasing cross-head velocity is necessary.
3.1.2 Compression testing These may be performed on cylindrical or plane samples. The advantages are: • •
larger strains are possible, typically 120-140% when cylinders are compressed and up to 200% when plane samples are tested; and the state of stress is mostly compressive, as in bulk forming. The disadvantages are that:
• • •
• •
frictional forces at the ram-sample interface grow as the test progresses and the their effects must be controlled and removed from the data; tensile straining at the cylindrical surfaces or the edges of plane samples limits the level of straining; the achievement of constant true strain rates during the tests requires careful feedback control, making the use of a cam-plastometer or a computer controlled servohydraulic testing system necessary; the distribution of the strains in the normal direction is not uniform; and when plane-strain compression is performed, isothermal conditions are diflficuh to achieve.
3.1.3 Torsion testing This type of testing is the most suitable for large strain processes. Finite strains of 400500% are obtained, allowing the simulation of the complete history of hot rolling, including the phenomena at the roughing mill and the finishing train of hot strip mills. The advantages are: • • •
very large strains are possible; constant rate of strain is simple to achieve; and no frictional problems exist.
The disadvantages are that: •
the torsional stresses and strains vary over the cross-section and a considerable amount of analysis is necessary to extract the uniaxial normal stress - strain data; and MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
63 the variation in the time it takes for different locations of the cross-section to experience metallurgical phenomena, specifically dynamic recrystallization, may cause a non-homogeneous structure.
3.2
POTENTIAL PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED DURING MECHANICAL TESTING
Many of the tests designed to simulate the hot or the cold rolling process are conducted in compression, of plane or axially symmetrical samples. The test procedures are well understood but two areas of potential diflSculties still exist: that of friction and temperature control. In what follows, these difficulties are discussed. 3.2.1
Friction control
This problem is encountered in the compression testing process, whether using axially symmetrical or plane samples. As the samples are being flattened, the contact area grows and continuously increasing effort must be devoted to overcoming the frictional resistance at the compression platens. Baragar and Crawley (1987) showed that frictional effects are not very pronounced when strains under approximately 0.7 are considered. Above that level of deformation, however, the increasing frictional effects must be removed from the forcedeformation data in order to obtain uniaxial behavior. This may be accomplished by adopting the relation:
K'^]
<"'
where the uniaxial flow strength is Of, p is the interfacial normal pressure, m is the friction factor and d and h are the current diameter and height of the sample, respectively. The friction factor is best determined in the ring compression test (Male and DePierre, 1970). Avitzur (1968) quotes Kudo's (1961) formula, connecting the coefficient of Coulomb friction and the friction factor in the form // {p^^laj)= mj^ji. In what follows, an example of the use of the above formula, Eq. 3.1, is presented, considering the compression test, performed on a Nb-V microalloyed steel. Samples of the steel, measuring 10 mm in diameter and 15 mm long were compressed under isothermal conditions, at a constant true strain rate of 0.05 s'V The temperature of the sample was 950°C. Three tests were conducted, the results of which are shown in Figure 3.1 (Wang, 1989). In all three tests, glass powder in an alcohol emulsion was used as the lubricant. The first experiment used a sample prepared with its ends machined flat and beyond a strain of 0.8 the resulting stress - strain curve indicated a steep rise which, if no elevated temperatures were employed, may easily be confused with strain hardening. In the second test, the well-known Rastegaev technique (1940) was followed, indenting the ends of sample to a depth of 0.1 mm and leaving a ridge of about the same dimension. The objective was to trap the lubricant at the ram/sample interface. The resulting curve still indicated some rise. (It is noted that researchers THE RESISTANCE OF THE MATERIAL TO DEFORMATION
64
often employ very shallow, concentric or spiral grooves on the flat ends, to achieve the same objectives. The present writers' experience indicates that multiple grooves are more difficult to machine without offering any significantly increased benefits over recessed ends in the reduction of fiiction.)
200 160 120
a (MPa)
80 40
1. specimen withflatends 2. specimen witti recessed ends 3. con-ection of curve-1 for friction (m=0.18) Nb-V steel, QSCC, s = 0.05 1/s r
0.0
\ -t
0.4
0.8 8
1.2
1.6
Figure 3.1 True stress - true strain curves of a Nb-V steel, at 950°C, under three different conditions (Wang, 1989)
In the third attempt, the value of the friction factor, under the same conditions, was determined to be 0.18. The uniaxial flow strength was calculated and is shown in Fig. 3.1. The curve demonstrates the steady state behavior, expected of the steel, at the test temperature and strain rate. In cold testing it is easier to minimize fHctional problems by using a double layer of teflon tape over the flat ends of the sample. Removing the effects of friction when plane strain compression is being performed is equally important. 3.2.2
Temperature control
While it is essential to do so, it is difficult to conduct a test for the stress-strain curve under isothermal conditions. It is equally difficult to measure accurately the temperature of the sample during the experiment. Overcoming the first difficulty is most important when compression tests are conducted. The second problem is of significance when the test results are reported. Isothermal conditions: The usual procedure in conducting a test is to preheat the furnace and the compression rams to the desired temperature. This is followed by opening the furnace door, placing the sample on the bottom ram for a sufficient length of time to reach a steady state, bringing the top ram in contact with the sample and starting the compression process. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
65 The rams are usually of a larger diameter than the compression sample and are of considerably larger thermal mass. They are connected to the loadcell and the actuator by watercooled heat exchangers, and their lengths are considerable, even if the heated length of the furnace is not very long. Because of the heat exchangers, the rams' temperature is not uniform along their lengths and typically they are lower than that of the furnace. The furnace temperature is usually monitored by a thermocouple whose bead is a few millimeters away from the insulation. The control of the fiimace temperature is achieved by monitoring the output of this thermocouple. The average temperature within the furnace is quite probably lower than the indicated value. When the furnace is opened to allow the placing of the sample on the ram, considerable cooling takes place. While time consuming, expensive and labor intensive, a thermocouple should always be embedded in the sample and in the loading rams. Alternatively, of course, optical pyrometers may be used. The thermocouple in the sample will indicate the rise due to work done on it. In reporting the results this rise should be accounted for. Realizing that the work done per unit volume is almost exactly equal to the area under the true stress - true strain curve, the temperature rise may be estimated by: (3.2)
where the specific heat is designated by Cp and the density by p. Corrections to obtain the flow curve under isothermal conditions require the determination of the temperature as the sample is being compressed and inter- and extrapolation to compute the appropriate values of the stresses. In these calculations it is assumed that all work done is converted into heat, an assumption which is not quite correct. The error, however, is not large.
240
200 H
e 160 120 H 0.120% Tl, 0.07% C l 0.035% Tl. 0.06% C 0.028% Nb, 0.13% C AISI 5140 0.05% Nb, 0.12% C
80
40
T^
600
!^
800 1000 temperature (°C)
1200
Figure 3.2 The temperature dependence of the peak stress of several steels
THE RESISTANCE OF THE MATERIAL TO DEFORMATION
66 Monitoring the temperature: The accuracy of the temperature measurements should be considered as well. Manufacturers' catalogues list the accuracy of a type K (chromel-alumel) thermocouple as ±0.5%. If testing at 1000°C is considered, this indicates a potential error of 10°C. The temperature sensitivity of steels varies over a large range, as shown in Figure 3.2. In the worst case scenario, the microalloyed steel shows a slope of 0.9 MPa/°C and the 10°C difference would then indicate an error in the strength of 9 MPa. As the steels strength at that temperature is about 60 -70 MPa, the very small error in temperature measurements creates a very much more significant error in the strength data. It is, of course, advisable to use thermocouples of high accuracy.
3.3
REPRESENTATION OF TRUE STRESS - TRUE STRAIN CURVES
When the objective is to determine the parameters of the flat rolling process, using a mathematical model, it is necessary to develop an equation for the true stress-true strain curve of the metal to be rolled. This equation will form part of that model. Since the ae curve is a function of a large number of parameters, the complete equation may take the form Resistance to deformation =/(temperature, strain, rate of strain, method of testing, pre-test austenite grain size, pre-test thermal history, potential for precipitation, etc) An empirical relation of this type is, of course, not practical. Useful relations for both cold and hot working have been published in the technical literature. Accuracy of the prediction of roll separating forces depends, in a significant manner, on the correctness of the description of material's physical properties. In cold rolling, it is sufficient to include the effect of the strain in the metal's resistance to deformation. The problem of the evaluation of the flow strength is particularly diflficuh in hot rolling processes. The flow strength is a function of both current process parameters (strain rate, strain and temperature) and the history of deformation, including the metallurgical structure of the metal. The fact that relations between the flow strength and strain are complex when dynamic restoration processes take place makes the subsequent analysis even more difficult. A number of stress-strain relationships suggested in the scientific literature have been tested with respect to their ability to approximate experimental data. The tests, which are analyzed below, have been performed at THYSSEN KRUPP STAHL and they include compression of axially symmetrical samples at various temperatures and strain rates. An inverse technique is applied to account for strain inhomogeneity and for deformation heating during the tests. 3.3.1
Cold rolling
The relations given below have been found useful in the analysis of cold rolling: G--Ke" or G=Yj^^Bsf MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
(3.3)
67 where K, n, YQ, B and «i are material constants, to be determined by curve fitting. K and n values have been given for a large selection of metals by Altan and Boulger, (1978), including ferrous and non-ferrous metals. The constants Jo, B and «i are to be determined by non-linear regression analysis. Several other possibilities, expressing the strain-dependent nature of the metal's resistance to deformation during low temperature testing, are also available. These are too numerous to mention here and it may suffice to comment that, in the experience of the authors, the relations given by Eq. (3.3) have been very useful for the modeling of the cold, flat rolling process. 3.3.2
Hot rolling - parameters influencing the flow strength of steels
Knowledge of the resistance of the material to deformation is essential for the prediction of roll forces and torques, needed when the draft schedules for a particular steel are developed. The knowledge is further necessary for the control of the evolution of the microstructure during and after the hot rolling process, which precedes further cold rolling, as well as for the prediction of the mechanical and metallurgical properties after rolling and cooling (these topics v^U be discussed, in detail, in Chapters 6, 7 and 8). The magnitude of the flow strength during- hot forming is influenced by the initial grain size, microstructural evolution and the parameters of the deformation. Microstructural changes, discussed in detail by Kuziak (1997), are caused by a combination of athermal hardening, thermally activated recovery and thermally activated recrystallization. These three phenomena govern the changes of dislocation populations. The overall rate of changes of the dislocation density, which does not achieve the critical value necessary to trigger dynamic recrystallization, is described by the follov^ng equation: ^=Hie,pyR{p,D at
(3.4)
where p is the density of the dislocations, H{s,p) represents athermal hardening and R(pj) indicates the changes of dislocation density due to recovery. Analysis of experimental stress-strain curves allows the observation of the influence of the competitive phenomena of hardening and restoration. Two basic characteristics of these curves can be distinguished: •
stress-strain curves in which hardening processes are compensated by recovery before the dislocation density reaches its critical value for onset of dynamic recrystallization (Figure 3.3); and • stress-strain curves in which the strain increases to its critical value for dynamic recrystallization before the equilibrium between hardening and recovery of the dislocation structure is reached (Figure 3.4).
The first kind of stress-strain curve is illustrated, schematically, in Figure 3.3. On the application of the load, both hardening and softening processes become active and their time rates of change determine the shape of the resuhing curve. The grains flatten and elongate, a hardening process that is often referred to as pancaking. At the same time, after a very small THE RESISTANCE OF THE MATERIAL TO DEFORMATION
68 strain, dynamic recovery begins. This process, by rearranging the dislocations, attempts to reestablish some of the original softness of the metal. As the two processes compete, the slope of the stress-strain curve is reduced, indicating that the rate of restoration is higher than that of pancaking. When they reach equilibrium, the stress-strain curve reaches its steady-state value and the applied stress, needed to cause continuing deformation, remains unchanged.
Grains flatten Dislocation density increases subgrains
Constant disbcation density Equiaxial subgrains
S = constant T = constant
strain
Figure 3.3 Shape of the stress-strain curve, obtained when the hardening and recovery rates are equal before the critical strain is reached The symbols used in Figure 3.3 designate the following: £m - strain at which the hardening and restoration processes come to equilibrium before the critical strain is reached; € - strain rate, s'^; T - temperature, K. Hardening of the material during plastic deformation leads to an increase of its internal energy. In consequence, processes which oppose this increase become active. Deformation of materials with low stacking fault energy usually causes the onset of dynamic recrystallization, as shown in Figure 3.4. The dynamic recrystallization process starts when the dislocation density reaches its critical value, corresponding to the critical strain, 6c, whose magnitude is slightly lower than the strain corresponding to the peak stress. For a given stacking fault energy, the critical strain is a function of the temperature, strain rate and the austenite grain size. If dynamic recrystallization starts during deformation after it is completed, other processes leading to a decrease of the dislocation density take place. These processes include metadynamic recrystallization, static recrystallization, metadynamic recovery and static recovery. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
69 If dynamic recrystallization has not started, only static restoration processes are active after the deformation. Due to the large surface area of the grain boundaries, even after reaching the dislocation density similar to that after annealing, the microstructure retains the tendency to decrease its internal energy. These phenomena are illustrated by the two curves in the figure, one of them indicating dynamic recovery only while the other shows dynamic recrystallization. The various metallurgical events are also listed, including the pancaking of the grains, increases in the density of dislocations and the creation of subgrains. Reference is made to the shape of the new, dynamically recrystallized, strainfi-eegrains.
Grains elongate Dislocation density increases Subgrains are created Initial grains disappear [ Dynamically recrystallized grains are equaxial
•f•f^^^•+++-^-^ ++-^^ + -^- + ^-'^ [ steady state flow )
oooooooooooo £ = constant T = constant strain
Figure 3.4 Shape of the stress-strain curves; the strain reaches its critical level before equilibrium between hardening and recovery is established The symbols in Figure 3.4 are defined below: £c - critical strain for dynamic recrystallization, Sp - strain corresponding to the peak on the stress-strain curve, 8ss - strain corresponding to the end of dynamic recrystallization, cTs - yield stress corresponding to the equilibrium between hardening and recovery, ois- stress corresponding to complete dynamic recrystallization. The combined effect of the temperature and strain rate on the flow strength is expressed by the Zener-Hollomon parameter, often referred to as the temperature corrected strain rate: Z = € exp
(3.5)
RT
where Q^ is the activation energy for plastic deformation, R is the universal 8.314 J/mole/K and, as before, Tis the temperature in K. THE RESISTANCE OF THE MATERIAL TO DEFORMATION
constant.
70 Low values of the parameter Z and fine grains foster the appearance of the characteristic peak on the stress-strain curve, as shown in Figure 3.4, indicating that djmamic recrystallization has begun. When further deformation leads to a stabilization of the stress, dynamic recrystallization is completed. Ideally plastic flow takes place beyond that value of the true strain, with the rates of the hardening and restoration processes in equilibrium. In that region the resistance to deformation is independent of the level of strain.
Z2
Zi=Z2>Z3
Zi
D^Dz^D^
HHm^^^^^^^^^
^
W^' strain
Figure 3.5 Influence of the Zener-HoUomon parameter (Z) and the austenite gram size prior to deformation (D*) on the character of the stress - strain curves
Progress of dynamic recrystallization also depends on the relative size of austenite grains prior to deformation and after recrystallization in the whole of the deforming body. If this ratio is less than two and the strain rate is low, dynamic recrystallization takes place simultaneously over the whole volume. This leads to oscillations of the stress-strain curve, as shown in Figure 3.5. Each oscillation corresponds to one cycle of nucleation and growth of the nuclei, and each cycle causes growth of the grains. The flow strength reaches steady-state when the grain size reaches a stable value over the complete volume of the sample. When the ratio between the grain size prior to deformation and the grain size after dynamic recrystallization is greater than two and the strain rate is high, the hardening process is rapidly compensated by recovery. Thus, cycles of nucleation and growth of the nuclei are suppressed very fast. Further cycles of recrystallization are not synchronized and oscillations on the stress strain curve are not observed. The metal's resistance to deformation is then dependent on the rate of strain and the temperature. These phenomena cause difficulties with the analytical description of the stress-strain curves as it is difficuh tofindfimctionsthat fit experimental data well over the complete deformation process. Thus, a large number of empirical equations for constitutive relationships has been suggested in the scientific literature, some of which will be reviewed later. However, due to the fact that a majority of practical industrial steel rolling processes is governed by static restoration phenomena, the emphasis in the present work is placed on the type of stress-strain curves, shown in Figure 3.3. MA THEMA JICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
71 3.3.3
Criteria for the choice of constitutive relation, relevant for computer simulation of hot rolling of steels
Numerous data presented in the scientific literature are used for the assessment of various stress-strain functions (see, for example, Lenard, 1989; Pietrzyk and Lenard, 1991; Grosman, 1996; Grosman, 1997). The choice of this function should account for all phenomena essential for an accurate simulation of the hot rolling process. Among all functions describing the stress strain relationships, those accounting for the evolution of the microstructure, time dependence and the directions of the principal strains should be considered (Grosman, 1997). Continuity of the deformation is an essential criterion for the classification of hot metal forming processes. Rolling processes are characterized by a sequential form, in which the process is interrupted. The interruption time. At, is the major factor influencing the effect of the previous passes on the metal's behavior in the current pass. There is no critical value of this time below which previous deformations should be accounted for. The practical values of this critical time depend strongly on the steel's chemical composition. The influence of a change of strain directions on the yield stress is currently being investigated by several scientists. It is an important problem, primarily in processes other than flat rolling and it will not discussed in the current work. Function describing the constitutive behavior of metals at high temperatures can be divided into several groups, which differ by the parameters accounted for (Grosman, 1996). These are • • • • •
Group I functions (Jp- f {€) which account for the current strain (f), and, in some cases, for the initial stress (ao) or initial strain (^b); Group n functions (T^ = f (f, e ,T) which account for an influence of the current temperature (7), stram rate (^) and strain (^); Group i n functions <jp = f (f, ^ , T, ow ) which in addition to the temperature, strain rate and strain account for the influence of an internal state variable of the material (Cw); Group IV functions, in which the independent variables are the temperature, strain rate strain and additionally time (/); and Group V fiinctions, which account for an influence of strain directions.
Functions in Group I are eflfective in the simulation of cold forming processes only and are not discussed in detail here. Functions in Group II are most commonly used in the computer programs which simulate hot forming processes, and these functions are discussed in the present project. They describe the yield stress in a majority of hot strip and plate rolling processes properly and they give reasonably accurate results. The main difficulties in development of these functions are connected with an appearance of three intervals on the stress-strain curves for materials subjected to dynamic recrystallization. 3.3.4
Methods of calculation of the yield stress in hot rolling processes
As mentioned above, only functions in Group II are analyzed here. Difficulties in the mathematical description of these functions are caused by the necessity of describing the stressTHE RESISTANCE OF THE MATERIAL TO DEFORMATION
72 strain curve over a wide range of strains. A typical function, which accounts for the three intervals on the stress-strain curve, is (Lehnert and Cuong, 1994): c7^=^f^exp(C£^+F)
(3.6)
Various combinations of the coefficients A, D and F give different versions of the function (3.6). The most commonly used involves B = C^ const, D = 1 and F = 0, yielding: (3.7)
a^=.4^^exp(C£)
When B = constant, the maximum value of the yield stress, cTpm, appears for a particular strain €p independently of the temperature and the strain rate. This does not agree with experimental observations. The function can then be improved by the introduction of the parameter B, the dependence on temperature of which may be given by a linear function: B = G-^ HT, or by an introduction of parameters characterizing the extremum (o^, Sp) into Eq. (3.7). Kliber (1994) suggests the following function to account for the strain Sp, associated with the peak stress:
or = A exp K^p
A^J
(3.8)
An introduction of the dependence of the yield stress on both peak stress oi and the strain Sp corresponding to it is another possibility of mathematical representation of the stress-strain curve:
-exp 1 —
(3.9)
Logarithmic functions describing stress-strain relationships can be easily converted to a linear one. In consequence, this makes the approximation of experimental data easier. Among other methods of descriptions of the stress-strain curve, polynomial functions should be mentioned. This approach, however, is rarely used. Beyond the functions, which describe the yield stress over the whole range of strains, functions describing it in particular intervals of strains are conmionly used as well. The range of the description of the yield stress is usually limited to the interval 0<€< Sss. Constant value of the yield stress is assumed for the strain e > Sss (Figure 3.4). The following relation is oflen used for the interval e < Sc. C7^ = (Jo + ^[l - exp(- Bs^
(3.10)
The interval, which corresponds to the dynamic recrystallization e> Sch approximated by the function: MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
73
cr^ = J
'-
(3.11)
The Voce equation (Hodgson, 1990) is a function that describes the stress-strain curve, accounting for the dynamic recrystallization, and which is most popular among scientists: ^p=^s^{cj^-c7,)A[\-Qxp{-As)Y
(3.12)
The yield stress in Eq. (3.12) decreases from the maximum value of oi, to a steady state value <J„. Coefficients in Eq. (3.12) and stresses Oi and ois are functions of temperature and strain rate. Generally, it is a joint influence of temperature and strain rate, and is represented by the Zener-HoUomon parameter. Usually the maximum value of stress is calculated as: a,=KsiT&i-'[{AZ)']
(3.13)
The equations presented above are efficient in describing the resistance to deformation of the metal. An analysis presented by Kusiak et al, (1995) shows that the Voce relationship, Eq. (3.12), is particularly well designed for this purpose. Functions, which also consider the influence of chemical composition of the steels on the yield stress, are considered as well. This usually allows the avoidance of costly plastometric tests for all steel grades being rolled. Stress-strain curves for some of the steel grades can be determined on the basis of comparative analysis of the chemical composition. Among numerous methods describing the yield stress as a function of the temperature, strain rate, strain and carbon contents, three are discussed below. The range of their application is limited to low and medium carbon steels, with some microalloying elements. Zyuzin's Method: This method has been developed on the basis of plastometric compression tests carried out for various steel grades (Zyuzin et al., 1964). The range of appHcations of the Zyuzin method is limited to the temperatures between 900 and 1200°C, strain rates between 10"^ and 10^ s\ and strains below 0.5. The yield stress in this method is calculated as: ^p=^poMA
(3.14)
The coefficients in Eq. (3.14) have the following definition: •
• • •
<j^o - base yield stress, determined for a particular temperature, strain rate and strain; since the base yield stress is characteristic for the material, it accounts for the chemical composition as well. kt- coefficient, accounting for the temperature; ke- coefficient, accounting for the strain; and ku' coefficient, accounting for the strain rate. THE RESISTANCE OF THE MA TERIAL TO DEFORMA TION
74 The values of base yield stress c7po and coefficients kt, ke and ku are given by Zyuzin et al., (1964) in the form of graphs. An approximation of the coefficients is convenient for numerical calculations. The following approximationfiinctionsare suggested by Pietrzyk et al., (1982):
(3.15) K=qsU'' where: qj to q6 - coefficients characteristic for the material, T- temperature in °C, € - strain, u average strain rate. It should be emphasised that, since stress-strain graphs for tool steels and high alloy steels are also given in (Zyuzin et al., 1964), the model may be used for these steels, with confidence. Shida's equation: Using a cam-plastometer, Shida (1974) tested about 200 low, medium and high carbon steels and developed an equation, which describes the metal's resistance to deformation as a function of the temperature, strain rate, stram and the carbon content. The equations also take account of the behavior of the steels in the austenitic, ferritic and in the two-phase regions. Shida's equation, which was originally published in an internal report to the Hitachi Corporation, (Shida, 1974), is also shown by Pietrzyk and Lenard, (1991). It is given by the relations:
yfj{£^
(inkg/mm^)
(3.16)
.[C] + 0.41 where for: r>0.95-! [C] + 0.32
a J. = 0.28 exp
0.01 [C]+0.05^
J
m=(-0.019[C]+0.126)r+(0.075[C].0.05)
while for: T<
a^ = 0.28
0.95
q
^^^"^^"^^ [C] + 0.32
([CIT)
exp
[C] + 0.32 0.19 ([C] + 0.41)
0.01 [C] + 0.05
MATHEMAHCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
75
,([C],r)=3o ([C]^o.9) fr-0.95 I B ^ \ [C] + 0.42J
m = (0.081[C]--0.154)
T-
0.019
[C] +0.207 +
m i ^ 0.027
[C] + 0.32
Remaining parameters in Shida's equation are: f=l3(5ef-l.5£ n=0A\-Q.07[C] r=(r+273)/1000 The symbols in the above equations have the following meaning: • • • •
r-temperature, °[C]; [C] - carbon content in the steel (weight %); € - true strain; €' strain rate.
Shida's formula is empirical and it does not have a physical meaning. It can be used for the following ranges of parameters: • • • •
carbon contents C <1.2% ; temperature T between 700 and 1200 °C ; strain rate e between 0.1 and 100 s'^; strain £-<70%
Shida's equation can be also applied for steels that contain a small amount of microalloying elements. In such a case the carbon equivalent may be calculated using the following equation: Ccq=[C]+[M«]/6+([C/-]+[F]+[M>])/12
(3.17)
which takes account of the contributions of Mn, Cr, V and Nb to the resistance of the steel to deformation. The symbols in Eq. (3.17) represent contents of elements in steel in weight %, and Ceq is the carbon equivalent, which is to be introduced in the Eq. (3.16). Note, that other chemical elements are also used in microalloying, including Ti, B, Mo and Al and their contributions, while not quite as pronounced as that of niobium, should also be accounted for in a complete formulation of the metals' strength. As well, steels often contain these elements, not singly but in combinations and that contribution should also be acknowledged. In order to assess the sensitivity of the predictive abilities of Shida's relations to the carbon content and the temperature, calculations of the flow strength for various process parameters have been performed. The results are given in Figure 3.6 which shows the dependence of the steels' resistance to deformation as a fimction of the temperature for various carbon contents. THE RESISTANCE OF THE MATERIAL TO DEFORMATION
76
As observed, the influence of the carbon is present only at lower temperatures, in the twophase region. The strength of the austenite appears to be independent of the carbon content. As the temperature is decreased, the deformation resistance of the steel is expected to increase. When the temperature, indicating the appearance of the first ferrite grains is reached, the strength is expected to fall with further temperature drop, since the strength of the ferrite is lower than that of the austenite. Tliis phenomenon continues while all of the austenite transforms to ferrite and beyond the temperature indicating the end of the transformation, the strength increases again. The dependence of the strength on the temperature is predicted properly in Figure 3.6. 400 carbon equivalent + 0.1 O 0.2 a 0.3 A 0.4 V 0.5
300 Q.
200
I
100
6 =0.3 t = 10s-i
\
700
800
I
I
\
900 1000 1100 temperature ('C)
1200
Figure 3.6 Yield stresses, calculated by Shida's formula, for various carbon contents
The hyperbolic sine function: Scientists have been working on a development of equations describing the yield stress in hot metal forming processes for many years. One of the relationships which gives good results for hot rolling processes uses the hyperbolic sine fijnction, combined with the Arrhenius-type temperature sensitivity term: ^ = Csinh(aa)"exp[--2-|
(3.18)
where • • •
^ is the strain rate; A,a,n2LTQ material constants; (Tis the yield stress; MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
77 • • •
2 is the activation energy for plastic deformation; Ris the universal gas constant; r is the absolute temperature (K);
Various other forms of relations, using the exponential dependence of the material's behavior on the temperature, are used in the literature. A variation, not employing the hyperbolic sine function, is demonstrated in Section 3.4.2 of this chapter. In order to compare Eq. (3.18) to experimental data, logarithm of both sides of this equation is taken: In(^) = ln(C) + «ln[sin(ao-)]-[-^ I
(3.19)
For a given temperature and stress, inclination of function ln[sinh(a(j)] gives a linear relationship between the strain rate and the coefficient n. Rearranging Eq. (3.19) and differentiatmg with respect to 1/7yields: Q=RnTp
(3.20)
where the yield stress' sensitivity with respect to the temperature for given strain rate is given as: _ c/{ln[sinh(aa)]} d{\IT)
^^^^
Introduction of the Zener-HoUomon parameter, defined by Eq. (3.5), into Eq. (3.18) yields the form: Z = s expf-^1 = C sinhCaa)"
(3.22)
and after taking the natural logarithm of both sides: ln(Z)=ln(C)+ n ln[sinh (ao)]
(3.23)
Equations (3.19) - (3.23) are used for the evaluation of «, Tp, Q and ln(^) for a given yield stress, as determined in an experiment, which should be conducted isothermally, using constant, true rates of strain. After relevant rearrangements, the relationship describing the yield stress and given by Eq. (3.13) is obtained, assuming K ^ a'^. A' = C\ p = n'^. This equation is valid for stationary flow only. Rolling processes usually involve lower strains, for which increasing or decreasing stresses are observed. Thus, an additional term, accounting for the strain, is introduced and the following formula is obtained:
THE RESISTANCE OF THE MA TERIAL TO DEFORMA TION
78 CT,=K£"'sinh-'[{AZy]
(3.24)
where: • • • 3.3.5
€ - strain; A, m,p- material constants; and^>.4'. Other forms of the relations for the resistance of the material to deformation
The above relations have been used in the literature in various forms. In what follows, some of these are reviewed briefly. Rao and Hawbolt, (1992) found that the constants in the hyperbolic sine law and the activation energy were functions of the strain in the foUowing form: ^ = ^ + C,
(3.25)
where 7, represents the constants and A^ Bi and C,are to be determined by regression analysis. Wang and Lenard (1991) used the power law and normalized strains e„=el e^ to describe the constitutive behavior of a Nb-V-HSLA steel, where Sss is the steady state strain at which the flow stress reaches a constant value after dynamic recrystallization. The constants in the power law at specific normalized strains were presented in a data bank. Devadas et al, (1991) described Misaka's double-power law to model theflowstress: tT=^3^"3^'«.exp^-^J
\RT J
(3.26)
where A^, m and m\ are material constants. In this formula, the effect of strain on the flow stress becomes explicit. Hatta et al. (1985) adopted the hyperbolic sine law to model the peak stress, (7p, and presented the constants as functions of the carbon content. Then, the flow stress was expressed as: o- =1.640-^^"^
(3.27)
Baragar (1987) used a modified Ludwik equation to present a stress-strain relationship cr = a + ^ f °^ + cf ° * + ds^'^
(3.28)
in which the constants a, b, c and d were determined by least squares regression analysis fi^om flow stress values, calculated by the hyperbolic sine law at specific strains. Devadas et al. (1991) compared predicted flow stress data for a 0.34% carbon steel deformed at 1100°C and a strain rate of 95 sec"^ with measured data from a cam-plastometer. This showed that Misaka's MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
79 model, Eq. (3.26), and Hatta's model, Eq. (3.27) overestimated the flow stress, and the predicted results from Baragar's method, Eq. (3.28) had a good agreement with the measured data. Gittins et al, (1977) derived a constitutive equation, to be used to predict the average flow stress in the roll bite: a=A^+r"(A,+A^\ns
+ ^]
(3.29)
where r is the reduction, and n, Ao, A\, A2, and A3 are constants. When dynamic recrystallization occurs, the softening behavior may be expressed by the Avrami equation (Beynon et al., 1992; Laasraoui and Jonas, 1991c):
^o- = (o-„ - o - ; j l - e x p
-AT'
(3.30)
where a'ss is the actual steady state flow stress after dynamic recrystallization, k\ a, 1713 are constants and e^ is the strain, corresponding to the peak stress. Laasraoui and Jonas (1991c) followed the dislocation theory to derive a formula to describe the strain hardening behavior:
^ = k / + k -(^J expC-nf)]"'
(3.31)
The effects of strain rate and temperature cannot be seen explicitly in Eq. (3.31). However, cr^, a ^ and Q are fiinctions of the Zener-HoUomon parameter. When dynamic recrystallization occurs, the Avrami equation, Eq. (3.30), is used to present the softening portion of the flow curve. Yada and co-workers (Senuma et al., 1984; Yada and Sebum, 1986) developed the following equation to model the flow stress:
a = aM" +aU -a,T\n^\aXdX"
(3-32)
where p is the dislocation density, do is the initial grain diameter, T is the temperature, s is the strain rate, and ao, ai, ci2, a^, ^ and a^ are constants. The change of dislocation density due to strain hardening, dynamic recovery and recrystallization are calculated by complicated equations (Senuma et al., 1984). Adebanjo et al., (1990) used a quantitative model MATMOD-Rex to model the effect of recrystallization on the flow behavior of steels. This model is capable of simulating flow stress peaks, flow stress oscillations, effects of strain rate and temperature, and the effects of dynamic/static recrystallization. 3.3.6
Some other possibilities for the representation of the resistance to deformation
Kaftanoglu (1989) used the Bezier, B-spline curve and surface generation techniques to describe deformation behavior at high temperatures and the relationships between flow stress THE RESISTANCE OF THE MATERIAL TO DEFORMATION
80 and strain, strain rate and temperature were represented in a 3-D graphical model. Without using a model to predict the flow stress, Lenard et al., (1987) directly utilized a multidimensional data bank to store flow stresses at different strains, strain rates and temperatures in digital form. Interpolation and extrapolation techniques were used to obtain flow stress values for those conditions unavailable in the data bank. Tsoi (1992) utilized a tree based neural network, called MARS, to model the yield ^rength of steels. Hwu et al., (1994) adopted back-propagation neural networks to store and predict the flow stresses of an extralow carbon steel over a wide range of temperatures (800 - 1100°C). The well-trained neural network not only predicted the flow stresses in the austenite region accurately, but also predicted the drastic changes of flow stress very well when the phase transformation from austenite to ferrite took place. Xu et al., (1994) used multi-layered B-P networks to model the theoretical calibration curve of the ring compression test. The coefficient of fHction at the interface and the flow stress were predicted. Yang et al., (1993) used fuzzy inference to manage a database of flow stresses of carbon steels. The effect of blue brittleness on the flow stress was handled effectively. (Knowledge based modeling, artificial intelligence techniques, including the use of neural networks, are presented in Chapter 9.)
3.4
CASE STUDIES
In what follows some specific examples, dealing with the determination of the parameters of the relations, describing the materials' resistance to deformation are presented. Flow curves for microalloyed steels are given. 3.4.1
True stress - true strain curves of a low Nb-V steel
Compression tests, using cylinders of 15 mm height and 10 mm in diameter, were conducted, under constant temperature conditions and using constant, true strain rates. The ends of the samples were prepared such that the lubricant (Deltaglaze 19, a glass powder alcohol emulsion) was not squeezed out during the compression process.
Table 3.1 The chemical composition of the steel, weight % C Mn Si Nb V Cu Ni 0.13 1.55 .28 .028 .049 .34 .33
P .013
Al .07
Cr .23
S .009
Fe rest
The tests were conducted using a computer controlled servohydraulic system. The samples were compressed in an enclosed fiimace, using water-cooled compression rods, made of Inconel. The temperature of each sample was measured during the test, using type-K thermocouples, embedded halfway. The results demonstrate the expected appearance of the stress-strain curves. The metal's strength is highly temperature and rate dependent. The effects of the dynamic restoration, including dynamic recovery and recrystallization processes, are clearly observable. The effects MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
81 the process variables are also noted, showing that the strain, corresponding to the peak stress, increases as the rate of straining is increased.
ZOU'
240 n ^~~~
8 (1/S)
^
240 200.
.
/ >^''""'^
5
/•'''''''''''''''^^
160 I f
a 160 (MPa) 120
(MPa) •
80-
200-
M 0.5
e(iy^) iilllMiMMlHllli
80 [/-.«»»»,»_
^IJ''----^-'^''^mBmmmmmm^
400.0
Nb-V Steel temperature, 900*C 0.4
0.8
1.2
^^****«^llllM'"m«>IIIMW 0 . 5
120- f y*'****'*'*VH>u.,,.,,,,,,,., .„„,,,.,.,.P'^^
1.
^^7 0
C)
0^005
Nb-V steel temperature, 950X 0.4
0.8
1.2
1.
8
Figure 3.7 True stress - true strain curves of a Nb-V steel, at 900 and 950 °C, various rates of strain (Wang, 1989) 3.4.2
Determination of the activation energy for deformation for a Nb-V steel
A variation of the hyperbolic sine function, Eq. (3.18), has often been applied to high temperature stress-strain relations, written in the form:
s^Aa^exp[~^
(3.34)
where A and n are material constants, Q is the activation energy in kJ/mole, R is the universal gas constant, equal to 8.314 J/mole/K and 7* is the temperature in K. The parameters A, n and Q are usually determined from the stress-strain curves. The activation energy may be determined by treating it as a material constant and using non-linear regression analysis to fit the relationship to experimental results. Arguably, a more fundamental approach is to calculate Q from the true stress-true strain data, following an approach similar to that given above by Eq. (3.20). The procedure is outlined below: • • •
perform a number of stress-strain tests at several temperatures and rates of strain; obtain the peak stresses and prepare a log-log plot of the peak stresses versus the temperatures; at an arbitrary stress level obtain from the plot two temperatures and the corresponding rates of strain; and
THE RESISTANCE OF THE MA TERIAL TO DEFORMA TION
82 determine the activation energyfromthe slope Q '>
A(ln g) A(-l//?r)'
This method is illustrated by making reference to the high niobium - high vanadium steel steel, of Tajima and Lenard (1996). The chemical composition is given in Table 3.2. Table 3.2 The chemical composition of the steel, weight % C Mn Si Nb V Cu Ni 0.1 1.093 .365 .088 .0795 .015 .014
P .008
Ti .0042
Ca .003
S .0023
N .009
Compression tests at a range of temperatures and strain rates were conducted on cylindrical samples of 10 mm diameter and 15 mm height. The true stress-true strain curves were obtained and the results at 900 and 950°C are shown below in Figures 3.4 and 3.5.
1.20
Figure 3.8 The true stress -true strain curves of the Nb-V steel, at 900°C, at rates of strain varying from 0.001 - 2 s'\ (Lenard and Tajima, 1995; reproduced with permission)
Figure 3.9 The true stress-true strain curves of the Nb-V steel, at 950°C, at rates of strain varying from 0.001-2 s'\(Lenard and Tajima, 1995; reproduced with permission)
Non-linear regression analysis may be used to obtain the relationships of the strain rate in terms of the peak stress, using the lines from Figure 3.11. For 950°C 6 = exp[(ln a^ - 5.244)/ 0.1178j and at 900°C MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
83 f = exp[(lnc7^ - 5.4006)/0.1041 ij The average activation energy for dynamic recrystallization is then obtained as 483 kJ/mole.
1000
Q.
2
i
100
s.
+ 950 "C ] O 900 'C
1 0 —\—I I 111 nil—I I I iiiiii—I I I iiiiii—I I I mill—r i i MIII|
1000 temperature ("C)
1.0E-4 1.0E-3 1.0E-2 1.0E-1 1.0E+0 1.0E+1 strain rate (s-"")
Figure 3.10 The variation of the peak stress as Figure 3.11 The variation of the peak stress a function of the temperature (Lenard and as a function of the strain rate (Lenard and Tajima, 1995; reproduced with permission) Tajima, 1995; reproduced with permission)
3.4.3
A few, specific equations, obtained for high temperature deformation of steels
The hyperbolic sine function, Eq. (3.18), has often been used in the analysis of hot deformation problems. A few examples for specific steels are given in Table 3.3. Table 3.3 Constants in the hyperbolic sine equation for a few specific steels source Hattaetal., (1985) Roucoules et al., (1994) Richards and Sheppard (1986) Richards and Sheppard (1986)
composition 0.036%C; 0.16%C; 0.53%C. 0.063%C, 1.2%Mn, 0.18%Mo. 0.006%C, 0.55%Mn, 18%Cr, 1.99%Mo. 0.008%C, 0.62%Mn,16. 7%Cr.
C(s-^) exp(24.4-1.69 ln[C])
m exp(l 63-0.0375 ln[C])
a (MPa ^) exp(-4.822 + 0.0616 ln[C])
Q (kJ/mole) exp(5.566 0.0502 In [C])
3.02 X 10^
3.910.3
0.016
295±35
2.58 X 10'^
2.89
0.017
338.8
3.44 X 10'^
2.59
0.0244
330.6
THE RESISTANCE OF THE MATERIAL TO DEFORMATION
84
3.4.4
Use of the stress-strain equations
Further use of these relations depends on how the rolling process is formulated mathematically. There are usually two possibilities. One may analyze the process by examining how stresses, strain, temperatures, etc. vary within the deformation zone. This usually requires the use of a finite-element program in which the stress-strain curves are to be used locally, to give the analyst the metal's resistance to deformation at those particular locations. The other, simpler procedure is to assume that within the deformation zone the resistance to deformation of the metal remains constant. The appropriate relations to calculate the average flow strength in the pass are determined by integrating over the strain experienced in the particular rolling pass. For cold rolling then the approach is as follows. If the stress-strain law is given by:
and the strain experienced by the strip is:
where h^ is the entry thickness and hi is the exit thickness, the average flow strength of the strip is obtained as:
"max
0
where Gf^ is the average flow strength in the pass. When hot rolling is analyzed, the appropriate relation is :
where the average strain rate in the pass is given by:
The roll surface velocity is designated by v and the projected contact length is L, expressed in terms of the geometry of the pass as:
and R' is the deformed roll radius, to be defined in Chapter 4. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
85^
Chapter 4 One'dimensional Modeling of the Flat Rolling Process There are several possible objectives that may justify the mathematical modeling of the hot or cold flat rolling process. These include the analysis of metal flow and/or the metallurgical events during and after the pass, the off-line scheduling of the draft, the on-line adaptive control of the process or the design of the mill: the rolls, the frame, the drive spindle, the bearings, or the screwdown system. There are several mathematical models available in the technical literature to achieve these objectives and the choice of the most appropriate is not always easy. A general rule to be followed in the choice is to ensure that the complexity and the rigor of the model chosen matches that of the objectives. If only a quick estimate of the roll separating force is necessary, the simplest possible model should be chosen. If mill design is also planned and the mill frame, the bearings, roll diameters, spindle dimensions and drive motor specifications are to be determined, the model must be able to calculate the roll torque as well. For strip rolling, when the roll/strip thickness ratio is quite large and the non-homogeneity of compression is not very pronounced - conditions that are usually satisfied in thefinishingtrain of a hot strip mill or in a cold mill - one-dimensional models are satisfactory. If the distributions of the field variables are needed - such as the variation of the displacements, velocities, strains, strain rates, stresses and temperatures - use of the the finite element method is necessary. Most objectives are satisfied when two-dimensional formulations are utilized. When variation of the parameters in the direction perpendicular to that of rolling is needed, the analyst should consider the use of 3D models. These distributions lead to metallurgical parameters, such as the austenite or ferrite grain size, the amount of recrystallization and precipitation, and the properties of the rolled and cooled strip, the knowledge of which is necessary when the draft schedules are being developed. In general, however, two-dimensional, rigid-plastic models suffice and their resuhs can be used to determine the metallurgical phenomena, including the properties of the product, with good accuracy. The use offinite-elementsin modeling the flat rolling process is reviewed in Chapter 5. In what follows, several models will be reviewed and compared, including empirical formulations and one-dimensional analyses. In each, the success or failure of the ability of the model to predict the rolling variables is dependent on the mathematical rigor of the development, as well as on the knowledge and representation of the boundary and initial conditions: the coefficient of friction and the metal's resistance to deformation. The first one is the simplest possible technique, allowing one to determine the roll separating force with reasonable accuracy. This is followed by a description of Orowan's model, which, in spite of its age and the criticism directed towards it, is still considered by some as the industry standard. The models of Sims and Bland and Ford follow, both of which are based on the original von Karman/Orowan derivation and some simplifications which allow closed form solutions to be obtained. The last two models given are based on the refinements of the Orowan model. In the second of these, the use of the arbitrary friction hill is avoided. A
S6
_^
^
study of the sensitivity of the calculations to various rolling parameters - the coefficient of friction, roll radius, entry thickness and the reduction - is then presented and the chapter closes with a comparative examination of the predictive capabilities of the models, in both cold and hot rolling processes, by comparing them to experimental results.
4.1
FREE-BODY DIAGRAM OF THE ROLL-STRIP SYSTEM
The strip enters the deformation zone because of the friction forces exerted by the work rolls on it and as a result it first experiences elastic deformation. The limit of elasticity is reached soon after entry. The permanent deformation regime is thus in existence through most of the roll gap region, followed by the elastic unloading regime. These are illustrated in Figures 4.1a, b and c, which show a schematic diagram of a two-high mill and a strip ready to be rolled and rolled partway through in addition to the forces and torques acting on the work roll. The conditions shown describe either a laboratory situation where no front and back tensions exist, or a single stand, reversing roughing mill. Three stages of the rolling process are illustrated in Figures 4.1a, b and c. In part (a) the strip is about to make contact. If the coefficient of friction is larger than the tangent of the bite angle, a relationship that is often used to determine the minimum fiiction necessary to start the rolling process, the strip enters the deformation zone. In a laboratory mill, the usual practice is to push the strip, placed on the delivery table, toward the work rolls and allow the fiiction forces to cause entry; under certain circumstances it is necessary to taper the leading edge of the strip to facilitate the bite. In a strip mill, edge rolls force the strip into the roll gap in the first stand and the momentum of the strip exiting from there carries it into the deformation zone of the next stand. In either case, entry creates some longitudinal compression of the strip and there will be some initial thickening as well. This is accompanied by local, elastic deformation of the work rolls, indicating that the usual simplification about the entry point located where the edge of the strip encounters the undeformed, perfectly cylindrical roll - does not represent reality very well. Relatively little has been done to analyze the exact entry conditions of the strip into the roll gap, indicated by the circle in the Figure 4. la. In one of the attempts high speed photography was used (Kobasa and Schultz, 1968) to allow visualization of the entry conditions and the length of contact in the hot rolling process.
Entry i 5 imminent/
\
Force of friction V
Work roll
1
j
1
/
^. 1 Strip Roll fla ttening ^^ Thicke ning of 1 the str
y
1 1
\ •
) •
Figure 4.1a Schematic diagram of the strip's entry into the roll gap MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
87 Part (b) of the figure shows the strip about half-way through the deformation zone. As previously mentioned, the unloaded metal first experiences elastic deformation, and when and where the yield criterion is first satisfied, plastic flow is observed. These two regimes are separated by an elastic-plastic boundary, the location of which should be determined by an analysis of the rolling process. In the elastic region, the theory of elasticity governs the deformation of the metal. In the permanent deformation region, the criterion of yielding, the appropriate associated flow rule and the condition of incompressibility describe the situation. The rolls are fiirther deformed. The magnitude of the roll stresses should not exceed the yield strength of the roll material. The theory of elasticity is to be used to determine the roll distortion and the corresponding changes of the length of contact.
Roll separating force - ^ ; ^ ^ |
^\
The strip is partially L . _/^ L \ _ . 1 . _ . in the roll gap V \ _ > . . * — J ^ Roll torque
Elastic region ^
\
, ^^1-Plastic region
Elastic - plastic interface
Figure 4. lb The strip is partially in the deformation zone
In part (c), the leading edge of the rolled metal has exited and the rolling process is continuing. The figure shows the pressures, the forces and the torques acting on the roll and strip. These include the roll pressure distribution and the interfacial shear stress, the integrals of which over the contact length lead to the roll separating force and the roll torque. These are the variables the models are designed to determine. Iffi'ontand back tensions are present, as would be the case under industrial conditions, their effect on the longitudinal stresses at the entry and exit should be included in the definitions of the boundary conditions. The surface velocities of the roll and the strip should also be considered. It may be assumed that the driving motor is of the constant torque variety and that the rolls rotate at a constant angular velocity, even though there may be some slow down under high loads. The strip usually enters the roll gap at a surface velocity less than that of the roll. The friction force always points in the direction of the relative motion and on the strip it acts to aid its movement. As the compression of the strip proceeds, its velocity increases and it approaches that of the roll's surface. When the two velocities are equal, the no-slip region is reached, ofl;en referred to as the neutral point. At that location, the strip and the roll move together. If the neutral point is between entry and exit, the strip experiences fiirther compression and its surface velocity surpasses that of the roll. Several researchers suggest that reference should be made to a neutral region instead of a neutral point, hypothesizing that the no-slip condition extends ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF THE FLAT ROLLING PROCESS
88 over some distance. In that region, between the neutral point and the exit, the friction force on the strip has changed direction and is now retarding its motion. Roll separating force
Shear stresses on the roll surface
Roll torque
Roll pressure' distribution
Figure 4. Ic Free body diagram of the work roll and the rolled strip
4.2
AN EMPmiCAL MODEL
A simple model, fast enough for on-line calculations of the roll separating force, has been presented by Schey (1987) in his text "Introduction to Manufacturing Processes". The model expresses the roll separating force per unit width in terms of the average flow strength of the rolled metal in the pass, the projected contact length, L, a multiplier, Qp, to account for the shape factor and friction, and a correction for the plane strain flow in the roll gap. For the case when homogeneous compression of the strip may be assumed and fiictional efifects are significant, the model is written: (4.1) where the mean flow strength of the metal is obtained by integrating over the strain: 1
]G{e)de
(4.2)
for a cold rolling pass. The metal's resistance to deformation may be expressed by the constitutive relations given in Chapter 3 and the data of Altan and Boulger (1973). Further, for hot rolling:
where the average strain rate is given, in terms of the roll surface velocity, v, by: MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
89
(4.4)
The material parameters C and m may also be taken from the data of Altan and Boulger (1973) for a large number of steels and non-ferrous metals. As mentioned in Chapter 3, several empirical relations, describing the dependence of the metals' resistance to deformation on various parameters are presented in the literature, for both cold and hot deformation. The projected contact length is given in terms of the radius of the flattened roll, (R'), obtainable from Hitchcock's relation, Eq. (4.12), given below, and the reduction:
L = 4W^
(4.5)
Finally, the multiplier Qp is obtained from Figure 4.2 in terms of the coefficient of friction and the shape factor Z/7; where h is the average of the entry and exit thickness.
I I I I t t I I
11 I I I I I I I I i I I I I i I I I
0
4
8
12
16
20
Uh
Figure 4.2 The multipHer Qp, (Schey, 1987; reproduced with permission) The torque to drive both rolls per unit width is then expressed, assuming that the roll force acts halfway between the entry and the exit: M=P^
(4.6)
The power to drive the mill is determined using the torque and the roll velocity. The relation: Power -PwL—ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF THE FLATROLUNG PROCESS
(4.7)
90
_^^_^
gives the power in W, provided the projected contact length is in m, the velocity in m/s, the roll radius in m, and the units of the width, w, match those of the roll force/unit width. The rise of the temperature of the strip in the pass may also be estimated by the relation: Ar =
^^^ mass flow x specific heat
(4.8)
The multiplier Qp is useful when frictional effects are predominant and when the roll radius to strip thickness ratio is relatively large. In these situations planes may safely be assumed to remain planes and the non-homogeneity of compression in the roll gap is neglected. When the ratio L/h < 1, indicating that the thickness of the rolled sample and the roll diameter are of similar orders of magnitude, as may be the case in the first few passes of rough rollmg or plate rolling, a different multiplier is to be employed. Since the concern here is for strip rolling, the cases where non-homogeneity of compression is significant are not dealt with here.
4.3
THE TRADITIONAL MODELS - OROWAN, SIMS, BLAND & FORD
The one-dimensional models, based on the slab or the equilibrium method, have been published quite some time ago and often been reviewed. A detailed review of Orowan's models and its variations, including a computer program in FORTRAN, has been given by Alexander (1972), in which the predictive capability of the model was critically compared to that obtained using the simplifications of Sims and Bland and Ford. In what follows, the general ideas of their development will be given, including the essential equations, but the complete derivations and the solutions of the models will not be repeated. Orowan 's model: The model of the flat rolling process, first formulated by von Karman (1925) and later advanced and solved, using a graphical technique, by Orowan (1^43) is often considered to be the standard, a successfijl comparison to which qualifies a new model as acceptable. The model is based on the static equilibrium of the forces in a slab of metal undergoing plastic deformation between the rolls, shown in Figure 4.3. The roll pressure, distributed along the contact arc, the interfacial shear stress and the stresses in the longitudinal and the transverse directions form the stress system, the equilibrium of which leads to the basic equation of balance. Assuming that planes remain planes allows this relation to be a onedimensional differential equation of equilibrium in terms of the variables: the roll pressure /?, the strip thickness /?, the radius of the deformed roll R \ the interfacial shear stress r, the stress in the direction of rolling oi and the independent variable ^, indicating the angular distance, measured from the line connecting the roll centers: ^^^-^
= 2R'{psm (t> ± Tcos(f>)
(4.9)
where the ± sign indicates that the equation above describes the conditions of equilibrium between the neutral point and the entry (-ve sign), as well as between the neutral point and the exit (+ve sign). In fact. Equation (4.9) is comprised of two independent differential equations. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
91
^
I
ay+ day U Pv
elastic entry
\
elastic exit
neutral plane
Figure 4.3 The schematic diagram of the rolled strip and the roll (Pietrzyk and Lenard, 1991; reproduced with permission) The necessary additional independent equations are obtained from the theory of plasticity and the geometry of the deformation zone. These include the Huber-Mises criterion of plastic flow, relating the stress components in the direction of rolling and perpendicular to it:
-a,=2k
(4.10)
where k designates the metal's flow strength in pure shear and the strip thickness which can be obtained from: /? = /?2+27?'(l-cos^)
(4.11)
The radius of the flattened roll is obtained using the original Hitchcock equation (Hitchcock, 1935): R' = R
u'Azl^i TfEAh
(4.12)
where E is the elastic modulus of the roll material and v is its Poisson's ratio. The approach to determine the roll separating force and the roll torque proceeds from the mtegration of the equilibrium equations for the roll pressure. Starting at entry, using the appropriate boundary conditions and the -ve sign, integration leads to a curve for the roll ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF THE FLAT ROLLING PROCESS
92
^__^
pressure. The next step is integration from the exit, and using the appropriate boundary condition there leads to another curve for the pressure distribution. Two curves thus produced give in the pressures exerted by the rolled strip on the roll, usually named the friction hill. The location of the intersection of the curves is defmed as that of the neutral point. Further integration under the friction hill leads to the roll separating force and the roll torque. The necessity of accounting for the flattening of the work roll makes an iterative solution unavoidable. In the first set of calculations rigid rolls are assumed to exist. In the second, the roll force, that has just been determined, is used to calculate the flattening of the roll, and a new roll force is obtained. The iteration is stopped when a pre-determined tolerance level is reached. Corrections for the contribution of the elastic entry and exit regions are also included in the model. A complete computer program, integrating Orowan's equations by a Runge-Kutta technique, has been published by Alexander (1972) where a comparison of the predictive capabilities has also been included. Sims' model: Sims (1954) assumes that since the angles are small in the roll gap, they may be replaced by their magnitudes, expressed in radians. He also assumed that the product of the interfacial shear stress and the angular variable is negligible when compared to other terms and that sticking fiiction, that is T = k, is present in the deformation zone. These simplifications allow for the closed form integration of the equation of equilibrium, and the roll force per unit width is obtained as: Pr=2kLQ^
(4.13)
where the 2k stands for the yield stress of the metal, obtained in plane compression. The projected contact length is as given above - see Eq. (4.5) - and the multiplier Qp is dependent on the ratio of the radius of the flattened roll, the exit thickness of the rolled strip and the thickness of the strip at the neutral point, Y:
e„ =
i l^)-' fe-rMf-M
^If]'"i^
(4.14)
where the thickness of the strip at the neutral point is found by equating the roll pressures. The location of the neutral point is obtained from: (4.15) In the above relations r stands for the reduction. Because of its simplicity, Sims' model often forms the basis of on-line roll force models for hot rolling in the steel rolling industry. The model of Beynon and Sellars (1993), called SLIMMER, also makes use of Sims' approach. Bland and Ford's model: In addition to the small angle assumption. Bland and Ford (1948) assumes that the roll pressure equals the stress in the vertical direction and since the difference is a fijnction of the cosine of very small angles, the error is not large, especially in cold rolling MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
93 where roll diameters are usually much larger that the thickness of the strip. As with the Sims' model, this allows a closed form solution to be obtained. The roll force is then expressed:
P, = 2kR'\ J-^exp(^y^+jAexp[;/(//^ -H)}iA
(4.16)
where H is given by:
H=2j—tm-
^f']
(4.17)
The location of the neutral point is given by :
ftan^^^
(4.18)
This model is often used in the analysis of the cold rolling process.
4.4
REFINEMENTS OF THE OROWAN MODEL
Introducing the equations of elasticity to analyze the elastic entry and exit regions, as well as the deformation of the work roll led to a somewhat more fundamental model of the flat rolling process (Roychoudhury and Lenard, 1984). The model is still based on the slab method and it is applicable when the roll radius to strip thickness ratios are large, allowing for the assumption of homogeneous compression in the roll gap. The differences in between this model and the Orowan approach are as follows: •
•
•
the rolls are assumed to be cylinders, which deform elastically under the action of nonsymmetrical normal and shear stresses. Two, four or six high roll arrangements can be treated, depending on how the rolls are kept in balance. The theory of elasticity is used to determine the contour of the deformed roll; the elastic loading and unloading regions at the entry and exit are analyzed using the theory of elasticity. The elastic/plastic interface at both locations then becomes one of the unknowns and is determined during the solution process by using the Huber-Mises criterion of plastic flow; the equation of equilibrium is written using the variable in the direction of rolling as the independent variable. As well, the roll pressure and the interfacial shear stresses are expressed in terms of Fourier series. Assuming that as the metal strain hardens, individual slabs are ideally plastic, a closed form solution for each slab is obtained. Assembling the slabs leads to the complete solution for the pressure distribution and hence, to the roll separating force and the roll torque; and ONE'DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF THE FLA TROLUNG PROCESS
94 •
the roll pressures and the interfacial shear stress distributions thus obtained are then used to calculate the contour of the deformed roll, using the Fourier series and the biharmonic equation.
Since the details of the model have been published (Roychoudhury and Lenard, 1984), only a brief exposition is given below. The schematic diagram from v^hich the equation of equilibrium is derived, shown in Figure 4.4, differs from the one used by Orowan and Alexander - see Figure 4.3 - in that the roll contour is taken to be an unknown fiinction y = f(x), to be determined as part of the computation.
Figure 4.4 Schematic diagram of the rolled metal and the roll; the model of Roychoudhury and Lenard, 1984; (reproduced with permission) The balance of the forces of a slab of the rolled metal is now derived using the direction of rolling as the independent variable, leading to:
dx
h\p-2kTT^
-i^f"
(4.19)
The thickness of the strip, using C to designate half the distance between the two roll centers.
/i = 2(v + C)
(4.20)
Expressing the roll contour of one particular slab asy=ax:+d, and assuming that each slab is made of an ideally plastic metal simplifies Eq. (4.19), and closed form integration, slab by slab, is now possible. The constants of integration are determined by assembling the slabs such that horizontal equilibrium is assured. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
95 Note that the elastic regions at the entry and exit are also included in the model. The equation of equilibrium, Eq. (4.19) is valid in those regions. Combining them with Hooke's law leads to stress distributions in the loading and recovery regions. Using the Huber-Mises yield criterion, the elastic-plastic boundaries are also determined. The analysis requires the explicit determination of the constants a and b, defining the roll contour at each slab. By expressing the roll pressures and the interfacial shear stress distributions in terms of Fourier series and analyzing roll flattening following Michell's twodimensional elastic treatment (Michell, 1900), the roll separating forces are given by: Pr=p\
Ihihlhih'HyiMy
(4.21)
and the roll torques by:
^-y~;-^M[y^^^ *1
4.5
\dx~pj\ x-y—-ju\y + x— dx dx [ dx
(4.22)
A MODEL WITH NO FMCTION HELL
An extended version of the mathematical model of the flat rolling process, developed by Roychoudhury and Lenard (1984), is used in the present study. As is weU known, Orowan's model uses the friction hill, in which the location of the neutral point is obtained at the intersection of the roll pressure curves, extending from entry and exit. The equations of equilibrium are written, using a fiinctional form: ^
=
f{p,2KR,h,^h,E,v^±^)
(4.23)
and these are integrated separately, from the entry and the exit, using the appropriate algebraic signs for the friction terms. The neutral point is taken to coincide with the location of the intersection of the two curves. In the present refinement, only one equation of equilibrium, of the form: ^
= /[p,2^,/?,//„/i„£,v,//(^)]
(4.24)
is employed. An assumption for the variation of the coefficient of friction in the roll gap is made, with some guidance from previous experience. This assumption includes the location of the neutral point. The coefficient offrictionis taken to be positive between the entry and the neutral point and negative beyond it, changing gradually at the no-slip location. Thefiinctionalform is : (4.21)
ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF THEFLATROLUNG PROCESS
96 The equation of equilibrium is then integrated, starting with the known initial condition at the entry. Satisfaction of the boundary condition at exit drives the iterative process. This approach, "the shooting problem", has been used by Sa and Wilson (1994) in developing an analysis of fiill fluid film lubrication. Fig. 4.5 indicates the iterative nature of the model. A numerical experiment is shown in Fig. 4.6 where the effect of the assumed form of the coefficient of friction on the roll pressure is indicated. In using the model, the coefficient of friction distribution, from entry to exit, must be predetermined. This may be done by independent measurements or by assumptions. The first approach was followed by Hum et al., (1996), where the embedded transducer-pin combinations, discussed in Chapter 2, were used to establish the variation of the coefficient of friction in the deformation zone during hot rolling of commercially pure aluminum strips. The second approach, the inverse technique, is also possible. Here the coefficient of friction is used as a free parameter, to be chosen to force a match between the measured and computed rolling variables. This technique has been used before in the analysis of flat rolling by concentrating on the roll force only. The choice of the coefficient of friction is significantly more difficult when both the measured roll force and the roll torque are to be matched. The difficulty of the computations further increases when ihQ forward slip is added to the list of variables to be matched. The proposed method allows for the consideration of all three parameters. This eases the mathematicians' concern about the uniqueness of solutions obtained when two free parameters are assumed a-priori.
Figure 4.5 The iterations to satisfy the boundary condition at the exit (Lenard and Zhang, 1997) In Fig. 4.5, the iterations are shown, assuming that the coefficient of friction remains constant fi-om entry to some distance before the arbitrarily chosen location of the neutral point. A linear variation fi-om the negative value to the positive is then allowed. From that location on the coefficient is again taken to be a constant. The values of the fiictional coefficient on either side of the no-slip point need not be identical, but may be chosen at will. This approach - choosing two fi-ee MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
97 parameters - would not lead to unique values if only the calculated and measured roll separating forces are to be matched. The present model allows the roll torque, as well as the forward slip, to be matched and thus, the use of twofreeparameters should cause no mathematical difficulties. This technique is illustrated in Figure 4.6, where the roll force, roll torque and the forward slip are measured and calculated. The roll pressure distributions, as obtained by the constant and varying coefficients offrictionare also shown. 500-
400 Q.
5 300
5. 200+ H = constant o H=M(
)
100-
0.00 entry
0.01
Force (N/mm) Data 1289 H = 0.1376 1253 H=0.18/-0.14 1312
0.02 Radians
0.03
0.04 exit
Torque (Nm/mm) Slip (%) 4.50 6.10 4.75 3.99 3.86 6.28
Figure 4.6 Comparison of the predictions of the model with the results of an experiment while cold rolling an aluminum alloy strip (1100-H14) of 0.77 mm thickness, to a 20.3% reduction
The improvement of the predictive capability of the new model is evident when the measurements of all three parameters are compared to the calculated values. Allowing the coefficient of friction to be different on either side of the neutral point resulted in accurate computation of the force, the torque and the forward slip. The time of computations has also increased with the new model in a fairly significant manner, essentially because two separate iterative processes are involved. In the first, the boundary condition at exit is to be satisfied, accomplished by the proper choice of the location of the neutral point. After that, the roll force and the deformed roll contour are analyzed, and the second iteration ends when the roll separating force is within a certain percentage of the previously obtained value. ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF THE FLAT ROLLING PROCESS
98 Determination of the forward slip from the equation of equilibrium: The original definition of the forward slip is given in terms of the roll surface velocity and the strip exit velocity. Using mass conservation, it may also be given in terms of the strip thickness: S
— ^exit~^roll _• ^np~"exit
/^
22)
where the thickness of the strip at the neutral point is given by h„p and the thickness at the exit is designated by hexn^ There are two difficulties in using the one-dimensional models to determine the forward slip. The first concerns the basic assumption of the existence of static equilibrium of forces in the deformation zone, an assumption that is considered to represent the situation in a very realistic manner. Forces due to inertia effects contribute little to the mill loads. The result is, however, that the one-dimensional treatments make no reference to time and the definition of the forward slip, as given by the first part of Eq. (4.22) cannot be used. When metals, whose constitutive relations indicate rate sensitivity, are rolled the usual practice is to limit the use of velocity dependent terms to determine only their effect on the resistance to deformation. The exception concerns, of course, the case when mill chatter develops. The second difficulty involves the determination of the strip thickness at the neutral point, since the latter is located by an arbitrary method, at the intersection of the two pressure-distribution curves. In the present approach, the neutral point is located by satisfying the entry and exit boundary conditions and thus, the prediction is expected to be close to the actual location of the no-slip region. The thickness of the strip is then obtained in the usual manner, taking due account of the flattening of the roll, using Eq. (4.20). The model is not capable of handling cases of full, hydrodynamic lubrication. In those instances, the forward slip is negative. Negative forward slip results when the exit velocity of the strip is less than the roll surface velocity, and this in turn implies that the neutral point is located outside the roll gap. The model of Sa and Wilson (1994) has been developed to handle these cases. As well, Zhu et al., (1993) discussed elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication.
4.6
SENSITIVITY OF THE ROLL FORCE AND THE TORQUE TO SOME OF THE PARAMETERS
In what follows, the effects of some of the parameters on the roll separating force and the roll torque are examined. The calculations have been performed using a low carbon steel, having a uniaxial true stress-true strain curve, obtained in a tension test cr = 150(H-234f)P''' MPa A two-high rolling mill is assumed to be used with rolls of 250 mm diameter. The elastic modulus of the roll material is taken to be 210 000 MPa and its Poisson's ratio is 0.3. The model, developed by Roychoudhury and Lenard (1984), reviewed above, is used in the computations. As implied above, different models predict different magnitudes of the rolling parameters. However, the trends as predicted by each would not be expected to vary in any MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
99 significant manner. The efifects of the coefficient of friction, the roll radius, the reduction and the entry thickness on the mill loads, are shown in the figures below. In Fig. 4.7 the coefficient of friction varies from a low of 0.05 to 0.2 and the growth of the roll separating force is demonstrated. As is expected, the force increases in an exponential manner, indicating that as the coefficient of friction is increased, the effort in overcoming the frictional resistance becomes a substantial portion of the total required motor power. The model experienced some difficuhies in reaching satisfactory convergence when the coefficient of friction was over 0.2 and the reduction was over 30%, essentially because of the friction hill approach, as the top of the saddle point of the pressure distribution at the neutral point was growing. The same calculations yield the magnitudes of the roll torque for both rolls and the results are given in Fig. 4.8. The conclusions are as above, confirming the exponential growth of the roll torque with increasing friction. These results are of some importance and it is interesting that in the design of models in the rolling industry, much more attention is focused on the roll force than on the torque. In fact, the models are often referred to as the "Force model". Spindle design, motor power specification and bearing design are all based on the magnitude of the torque necessary to roll the strip, and accurate and consistent calculations should be used to determine it.
20000
E 16000
I
20000 a = 150(1+2348) R = 125 mm h= 1.00 mm
MPa E
16000-
12000
a = 150(1+2348) R= 125 mm i h= 1.00 mm
MPa
[i =0.2
M =0.2
^
12000
8
2
8000
•(6
8000
o
4000
p
4000
C
^
10
1
20 30 reduction (%)
^
40
Figure 4.7 The effect of the coefficient of friction on the roll separating force
50
10
I \ 20 30 reduction (%)
"T~ 40
50
Figure 4.8 The effect of the coefficient of friction on the roll torque
The entry thickness, as well as the roll radius, affect the loads on the mill as well, as shown in Figures 4.9 - 4.12, respectively. In Figures 4.9 and 4.10, a reduction of 20% was chosen while in Figures 4.11 and 4.12, the reduction was increased to 40%. ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF THE FLA TROLLING PROCESS
100
____^_
The loads increase when either the roll radius or the entry thickness are increased, essentially because of the increasing length of the contact zone. The effect of the roll radius on the mill loads is more pronounced than that of the thickness at the entry.
,3UU -
IVJUUU
E E 12000 -
a =150(1+2346)°^^^ Roll radius ^ = 0.08 i 20% reduction ^^^"^^400 mm
/A
a=-150(1+2348)°^^^ „^ b F 200-
= 0.08 ^= 20% reduction
/ 400 mm j
1
Z
8000-
^^^^ 200 mm
«—. 0)
A
/
3 CT
4000-1
*
+ „
^^'^ ""^
100 mm
O
/
100 J
y^
A/^
'*^^
A
'"^^ ^^•^""^
-f,.^---''''^
0
Q
1
2
1 1 1 4 6 8 entry thickness (mm)
010
30000
100 mm Roll radius
1 1 1 4 6 8 entry thickness (mm)
10
Figure 4.10 The effect of the entry thickness and the roll radius on the roll torque at 20% reduction
40000
E ^
1
2
Figure 4.9 The effect of the entry thickness and the roll radius on the roll separating force at 20% reduction
200 mm
800 a =150(1+2348)°"' H = 0.08 40% reduction Roll radius 400 mm
20000
a = 150(1+2348)°^^ ^i = 0.08 40% reduction
_ 600 E
I Z ^
400
«
go 2 200 H
10000
4 6 entry thickness (mm)
10
Figure 4.11 The effect of the entry thickness and the roll radius on the roll separating force at 40% reduction
entry thickness (mm)
Figure 4.12 The effect of the entry thickness and the roll radius on the roll torque at 40% reduction
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
101 4.7
THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF THE ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELS
Calculations were performed to test the predictive capabilities of five mathematical models, reviewed above. Data, obtained in the laboratory, referred to in Chapter 2, are used. Cold rolling of thin steel strips and hot rolling of somewhat thicker steel strips are considered. 4.7.1
Cold rolling
The first model is the refinement of the Orowan model, referred to as coldraj and the other is a fiirther refinement, which does not make use of the fiiction hill to arrive at a solution. The experimental results employed have been presented in Chapter 2 already where the calculations of the coefficient of fiiction were given. Briefly, low carbon steels were rolled, on a two-high experimental rolling mill. A low viscosity oil (Identified as lubricant A in Chapter 2) was the lubricant and the roll separating forces, torques and the forward slip were monitored for a range of rolling velocities and reductions. In the computations with the models, the frictional coefficients were chosen such that the calculated and measured roll forces should be reasonably close. The resulting roll separating forces and torques are given in Figures 4.13 and 4.14, respectively, for 27 and 45% reductions. The roll forces are quite close, as expected and the roll torques are approximately 20 -30% under the measured values, accounting for the fi-iction losses in the bearings. Thus, both models are capable of good predictions of the force and the torque, and the coefficients of fiiction, leading to these results are not too far fi*om oneanother. The differences are in the order of 10%. 9000
60 + experiments O Coldraj [ A varying friction j
8000
45% reduction
45% reduction
E 40H
^^ +
±
t +
o
+
I 7000 2 £
6000
o = 20 o + experiments O Coldraj A varying friction
5000
400040
80 120 160 roll velocity (rpm)
200
Figure 4.13 The roll separating force, as calculated by coldraj and the varying fiiction model, for two reductions
—\ 40
\ 1 r80 120 160 roll velocity (rpm)
200
Figure 4.14 The roll torque, as calculated by coldraj and the varying fiiction model, for two reductions
ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF THE FLAT ROLLING PROCESS
102
«
At this point one may conclude that, since both models predict the force and the torque, no further comparison is necessary. This conclusion changes when the models' predictions of the forward sUp are compared to experimental data, as shown in Figure 4.15. Evidently, allowing diflFerent magnitudes of the coefficient of friction on either side of the neutral point leads to good predictions of the forward slip. The use of a constant coefficient of friction and the friction hill technique to determine the location of the no-slip point, is singularly unsuccessful in predicting the slip. 20
16
^
45% reduction + experiments o Cold raj A varying friction 21% reduction
12 H 8H
40
1 \ "1— 160 80 120 roll velocity (rpm)
200
Figure 4.15 The forward slip as calculated by coldraj and the varying friction model, for two reductions
4.7.2
Hot rolling
The data, that led to the coefficient of friction during hot rolling of carbon steel slabs (see section 2.5.3, in Chapter 2), are used in this section. In the experiments roll forces, torques and the forward slip were monitored and it is these with which the predictive abilities of three models are tested. The models include the empirical one by Schey, the model of Sims and the finite-element approach that is reviewed in Chapter 5 of this book. The predictions of the FE method (elroU) have been discussed by Munther and Lenard, (1995). In that study, the twodimensional analysis was used to infer the magnitude of the coefficient of friction during the hot rolling tests, by matching the force, the torque and the forward slip. These coefficients are used here in Schey's model. As recalled, Sims' model assumes the existence of sticking friction in the roll gap. The mechanical properties of the hot steel are obtained from Shida's equations, given by Eq. (3.16). The predictions of the roll force are shown in Figure 4.16 and the roll torques are given in Figure 4.18. As expected, the force calculations, by all three models, are quite reasonable. The predictions are quite close to the measurements in all instances. Some inconsistency of the MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
103 calculations is evident in both Schey's and Sims' models, attributable to the difficulties with the coefficient of friction. Examination of the torque computations, done by Schey's method and the FE approach, reveals the need for the use of a more refined technique.
6000-
100 • measurements + finite elements o Schey's model D Sims' model
[ nominal reduction = 30% ) 80
I
?
4000 H
1 2^
60
40 H p
2000 H
600
• measurements + finite elements o Schey's model D Sims' model 1 \— " ~ n — i— — I 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 temperature (°C)
Figure 4.16 Roll separating force, as calculated by elroll, Sims' model and Schey's model, compared to experimental data.
4.7.3
20 nominal reduction = 30% J 600
700
800 900 1000 temperature (°C)
1100
1200
Figure 4.17 Roll torque, as calculated by elroH, and Schey's model, compared to experimental data.
A discussion of the prediction of the parameters of rolling by mathematical models
Since the list of available mathematical models describing either the cold or the hot, flat rolling process is prohibitively long, only a select few of them were presented and reviewed above. The choice was made to discuss the traditional models and their possible refinements, exclusively. The choice of models was narrowed even further when the examination of their predictive abilities was considered. Each of the models can be used for modeling and predicting the variables of the process as long as the original objectives of the procedure are kept in mind. Each of them is able to compute the roll separating force and if the coefficient of friction is adjusted with care, the calculations and the measurements can be made to agree practically within any tolerance. The difficulties increase when the roll torque is needed, a fairly unusual requirement of engineers in the steel industry. The torque can also be obtained though, quite accurately, and when the calculated magnitudes are 20 - 30% below the measurements, a good estimate has been obtained. While the friction losses in the drive train have been estimated, their close determination would require the knowledge of efficiencies and friction factors, none of which is known exactly. ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF THE FLAT ROLLING PROCESS
104
^______
The next level of modeling is to determine the forward slip, and, as pointed out above, this requires a still more complex technique. In that model, two values of the coefficient of friction are used, one near entry and one near the exit. In each of these, the coefficient of friction is treated as a free parameters. Of course, the coefficient is not that at all and, as discussed in Chapter 2, it depends on a long list of parameters, many of which are dependent on each other. The coefficient of friction, obtained by the inverse technique by any of the models, is only an effective value, masking factors and phenomena that affect the force, the torque and the slip. The conclusion is inescapable: the frictional coefficients, thus obtained, are usefiil for comparative evaluation but, close as they are to the actual magnitudes, they are estimates. Other factors that may affect mill loads include the dynamics of the process, the interaction of roll and surface roughness, the direction of the grooves of asperities on the roll surface, the roll crown, roll heating and thermal distortion, interstand tension, lubricant properties and delivery systems; of course, the list is incomplete. The mathematician may consider abandoning the usual technique of developing a model, conducting a few tests and claim success or otherwise when the limited number of comparisons are satisfactory. Statistical measures may well demonstrate the true ability of a model, revealing the accuracy as well as the consistency of its predictive ability. A consistent model can always be used. A sometime accurate but inconsistent one is useless. The comments of Barber (1991), quoted above, are still valid.
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
105
Chapter 5 The Finite-Element Method in Metal Forming The use of the finite-element method (FEM) to the simulation of metal forming processes originated in the late 1960s. Among the first approaches to the problem the works by Marcal and King (1967) and by Lee and Kobayashi (1970), dealing with elastic-plastic problems, should be mentioned. These authors obtained relatively accurate simulation of problems involving small plastic strains. The state-of-the-art in the finite element analysis of metal forming processes in the 1970s has been reviewed by a number of scientists. Examples include the publications of Kobayashi (1979) and Mahrenholtz (1982). Fast development of finite-element simulations of metal forming processes has been observed since then. Among numerous examples of the application of this method to the flat rolling process, the pilot works of Li and Kobayashi (1982), Mori et al. (1982) and Pietrzyk (1982) are of note. There are two major and distinct approaches to the simulation of metal forming processes. The first is the solid state incremental approach, which usually employs elastic-plastic or elastic-viscoplastic material models. This approach uses a Lagrangian description of motion. The nodal displacements are the basic unknowns, and these are related to the strains by the standard kinematics expressions (Zienkiewicz, 1977). The constitutive model used relates the stresses and the strains, and is expressed in an incremental form. The equilibrium equations can be written either as differential equations, to be satisfied in the volume and on the boundary of the body, or in a global sense as done by the principle of virtual work. The second approach, the flow formulation, uses the rigid-plastic or rigid-viscoplastic material models. Since in metal forming operations, the non-linear plastic strains are much larger than the elastic ones, the latter are usually neglected, allowing the use of a simpler rigid-plastic model in the analysis. The resulting constitutive equations in this approach are identical to those of non-Newtonian fluid. The nodal velocities defined in the Eulerian mesh are the basic unknowns in the flow formulation, and are related to the strain rates by the standard kinematics expressions (Kobayashi et al., 1989). The constitutive equations now relate the stresses and the strain rates. Various constitutive models are used in the flow formulation. These include the Levy-Mises model used in rigidplastic solutions, following the fundamental work by Lee and Kobayashi (1973), as well as visco-plastic models such as the Norton-Hoff law or the Sellars-Tegart law, discussed by Chenot and Bellet (1992). The main advantage of therigid-plasticmethod is that the power of deformation is calculated as a product of the invariants of the stress tensor and the strain rate tensor, making the solution insensitive to rotations. The resistance of the material to deformation can be introduced as a function of the strain rate, strain and temperature, and essentially any type of approximating function can be used. Both solid and flow formulations are commonly used for the simulation of bulk metal forming processes. In the present book, the emphasis is put on the latter method, which is considered more suitable for the large, nonlinear plastic deformations, found in the flat rolling process. The description of the mathematical model is given in some detail and the numerical aspects of the solutions are discussed.
106 Several examples of experimental validation of the model's predictions are presented, including the calculation of the distributions of stresses, strains, strain rates and temperatures. An attempt of accounting for the elastic deformations in the flow formulation approach is discussed in this chapter as well.
5.1
MGID-PLASTIC FINITE-ELEMENT APPROACH
Rigid-plastic finite-element models are the most efficient tools in the simulation of metal forming processes. They combine the accuracy of the finite-element technique with reasonable computing times and computer memory requirements. The representation of the boundary conditions is relatively straightforward. Introduction of models of the material's resistance to deformation is also quite simple. 5.1.1
Basic principles of the approach
The solution is based on the fundamental work of Lee and Kobayashi (1973), and is described in numerous publications, such as Pietrzyk and Lenard (1991) and Jackson and Ramesh (1992). This solution is described briefly below using a two-dimensional problem as an example. Extension to three dimensions does not present difficulties in the formulation. The problems are connected instead with mesh generation, as well as with memory requirements and significantly longer computation times. The rigid-plastic ^proach is based on an extremum principle which states that for a plastically deforming body of volume V, under traction s, prescribed on a part of the surface St, and the velocity v prescribed on the remainder of the surface Sv, under the constraint Sy = 0, the actual solution minimizes the functional (Pietrzyk and Lenard, 1991):
J = J(o-,f, + X€y)dV - js\dS,
(5.1)
where X is the penalty factor or Lagrange multiplier, and o} is the effective stress which, according to the Huber-Mises yield criterion, is equal to the yield stress ap. Further, ^, is the effective strain rate, iy is the volumetric strain rate, s = {TX, Ty}^ is the vector of boundary traction, v = {Vx, Vy}^ is the vector of velocities, v^, Vy are the components of the velocity vector, and T„ and Zy are the components of the external stress, which in metal forming processes is afi-ictionstress, applied on the boundaries of the deformation zone or stress caused by external tension. In the flat rolling process, the latter may represent fi-ont and back tensions, introduced by the loopers. In the flow theory of plasticity, strain rates are related to stresses by the flow rule, associated with the criterion of Huber-Mises:
2 = Ee
(5.2)
where: MA THEMA TJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPER TIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
107 ^G 3
0
0
0
-G 3
0
0
(5.3)
3
(5.4)
where cjp is the yield stress, ^, is the effective strain rate, g = {(TX, cxy, GxyY is the vector of stresses, e = {^;c> ^>'» ^xy }^ is the vector of strain rates, oi, c^, cJxy are the stress components, s^,ey,8^ are the strain rate components, and x,y are the Cartesian co-ordinates. Discretization of the functional (5.1) is performed in a typical finite element manner using four node quadrilateral elements. The velocity components inside the elements are given by interpolation: v = Nv, where v = {vi, , vg}^ is the vector of nodal velocities, and N is the matrix of shape functions M, N2, N3 and N4 which, for four node elements and plane strain or axisymmetric problems, is: N=
N, 0
0 N,
N^
0
N,
N^
0
0 N,
N, 0
0 N^
(5.5)
Similarly, a discretization of the external traction yields s = Ns, where s is a vector of the nodal values of the friction stress. Strain rates inside the elements are given by: e = Bv
(5.6)
where B is the matrix of shape functions and derivatives of shapeftmctions,given by:
^, dx B=
0 cN, ydy
0 ^ dy
cN, dx
^,
0
dx 0
^ dy
cN^ m^ dy
ac
m^ ^
0
^ dy
cN^ cN^ dy
0
dx
d)c
0
^
(5.7)
dy
m^
cN^
dy
dx:
The matrix B may be obtained from the equations of kinematics, relating strain rates to velocities. These equations, for a plane strain problem, are:
dx
-^dy
dv.
^„,=lf^ + dx 2^dy
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
(5.8)
108 In axisymmetric problems, an additional circumferential strain rate appears as a result of the radial velocity. This strain rate is calculated as s^^v^ly and, in consequence, an additional row is introduced into matrix B and Eq. (5.7) becomes: dN,
L
0
ac dN, u d^
B=
Vu y
0 dN,
y cN,
m, ac 0
0 ^,
0
dy v..y
cN,
y cN,
rN,
ac 0
0 rN,
4'
V
0 cN,
y
y cN,
/W,
ac 0 0 ^,
0
aN, 4V
(5.7a)
y
y cN,
ayacayacayacayac It is assumed in Eq. (5.7a) that x is the longitudinal co-ordinate and j^ is the radial co-ordinate. During discretization, the body of volume V is divided into rie elements, connected at w„ nodes. The functional for a single element is:
J
-i''¥~^
\dV + 2.y^h-\^{
(5.9)
where:
K B^EB
b = jB^a/r
f = jN^Ns^,
In these relations, E is the stress vs. strain rate matrix in the Levy-Mises flow rule, and c = {1, 1,0}^ is the matrix imposing the incompressibility constraint: Sy =c^|_=0. The functional for the whole deforming domain is the sum of the fiinctionals for the elements. Differentiation of Eq. (5.9) with respect to the nodal velocities and to the Lagrange multiplier yields a set of non-linear equations, which is usually solved by the NewtonRaphson linearization method. Details of this solution are given in several publications, see for example Chen and Han (1988). Linearization of Eq. (5.9) yields: p=K
Ay
(5.10)
where:
aj K=
P=
a,' A
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
1^ V is the vector of nodal velocities, calculated in the previous iteration and Av is the vector of increments of nodal velocities. The yield stress ap is introduced at each Gauss integration point as a function of the current local temperature, strain and strain rate. Relevant equations describing this function are discussed in Chapter 3. Solving Eq. (5.10) gives the nodal velocity increments Av which, in the iterative procedure, allow finding the velocity field. The iteration continues until the solution of the non-linear simultaneous equations converges to a pre-determined value. Various convergence criteria can be used. One, which has been shown to work well for several metal forming applications is to require that:
Z(Av,)^ <S
11^'' )^
(5.11)
where n is the number of degrees of freedom, Av is the increment of nodal velocity, and Sis the convergence criterion, which is usually taken to be between 0.001 and 0.0001. Solution procedures for non-linear systems, such as the Newton-Raphson method, require an estimate of the nodal velocities for the first iteration. If this initial estimate is too far from the actual solution, the iterations may not converge. The flat rolling process is characterized by simple geometry, which means that simple continuity equations can be used to provide the trial velocity field. For more complicated geometry, other procedures should be used. Lack of convergence can appear even for flat rolling, when large numbers of elements are used for the processes, involving large shape coefficients A, defined as the ratio of the average thickness to the length of the contact in the roll gap. The convergence of the solution should be controlled using the criterion expressed by the value of the norm {|p||, where p is the vector in Eq. (5.10). If this norm decreases in subsequent iterations indicates convergence. Otherwise, the nodal velocity increments are multiplied by an acceleration coefficient, according to the equation: V,., =v,+^Av
(5.12)
where / is the iteration number, and ^ is the acceleration coefficient which, for poor convergence is taken to be less than one. When the norm |{p{{ decreases rapidly in subsequent iterations, the coefficient ^ may be larger than one. Details on thefrictionalconditions in the roll gap are given in Chapter 2 of this book. Friction plays an important role in the modeling of rolling processes. Because the location of the neutral point is unknown, only velocity dependent friction models can be introduced in the rigid-plastic finite-element model for rolling. One such friction model, suggested first by Chen and Kobayashi, (1978), in which the velocity dependentfrictionalforces are defined by: r = /w
THE FINITE ELEMENTMETHOD IN METAL FORMING
(5.13)
110 is a possibility. In Eq. (5.13) m is a friction factor, Av is the relative slip velocity and a is a constant, few orders smaller than an average slip velocity. Pietrzyk and Lenard (1991) discuss the influence of the constant a on the friction stresses. Small values of a yield a distribution of the shear stress which is close to a step function near the neutral point in the roll gap. 5.1.2
Viscoplastic behavior
Most of the common constitutive laws for idealizing real materials have been obtained from experimental tests. The tests show that, in general, deformed metals exhibit temperature, strain and strain rate sensitivity. In cold forming processes, the strain is the major factor affecting the yield stress, while the influence of the other two parameters is negligible. Thus, a typical rigid-plastic description of the material's resistance to deformation is the most suitable for these processes. The yield stress Up in the Levy-Mises flow rule is then given in the form of a strain-hardening curve. In hot deformation processes, the majority of metals are also sensitive to changes of temperature and strain rate, and the influence of these parameters is often much stronger than the influence of the strain. The behavior of these materials is well described by the visco-plastic flow rule, which is expressed by a visco-plastic potential (Chenot and Bellet, 1992). The principles of the visco-plastic fmite-element solutions are described in numerous publications, see for example Zienkiewicz and Taylor (1989) and Chenot and Bellet (1992). These principles are outlined briefly below. Also, two commonly used viscoplastic laws will be discussed. The Norton-Hoff law was first used for uniaxial creep analysis (Norton, 1929) and extended to three dimensions by HoflT (1954). It is generally written in the form: a = 2K{yf3€,y~'e
(5.14)
Notice that: • w = 1 corresponds to the Newtonian fluid with a viscosity Tf = K; • /w = 0 is the plastic flow rule for a material obeying the Huber-Mises yield criterion with a yield stress Gp = ^J3K ; and • 0 < w < 1 is the first approximation for hot forming of metals. For more common metals m lies between 0.1 and 0.2, but for a superplastic material it can reach values between 0.5 and 0.7 (Chenot and Bellet, 1992). The SellarS'Tegart law for one-dimensional problems is written as (Sellars and Teggart, 1972): e = A^\T^{aa)^
(5.15)
or 1 sinh-n ^ A a
(5.16)
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
Ill Eq. (5.16), written for three dimensions, is:
Analysis of Equations (5.14) and (5.17) shows that in both laws the second derivative of the visco-plastic potential tends to infinity when strain rate tends to zero. Therefore, a normalized Norton-Hoff law has been suggested: o = 2K{Sf~^ (^0 + sf y^i
(5.18)
where SQ is a small constant such that if s^ » e^, Eq. (5.18) becomes nearly identical to Eq. (5.14) and when f, « SQ, the constitutive law tends to become purely Newtonian. A similar method of regularization applies to the Sellars-Teggart law, given by Eq. (5.16). Visco-plastic material models are commonly used in the finite-element simulations of metal forming processes. The domain V is discretized into finite elements in the usual way (Zienkiewicz and Taylor, 1989). The unknown velocity field is discretized and an analytical description of this field within an element is obtained by the interpolation v = Nv. The general form of the visco-plastic functional for the Norton-HofFlaw, after discretization is: J =J
-(V3f,j
ytn-r i
dV + ^XeydV+iy_dS,
(5.19)
y
where 2 is the penalty factor, Sj is the effective strain rate, Sy is the volumetric strain rate, s = {TX, Ty} is the vector of boundary tractions, v = {Vx, y^}^ is the vector of velocities, v^, Vy are the components of the velocity vector, and r^, Vy are the components of the external stress. Differentiation of the functional, Eq. (5.19), with respect to nodal velocities yields a set of non-linear equations, which is usually solved by the Newton-Raphson technique. 5.2
ELASTO-PLASTIC FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL
The flow formulation, described in the previous section, developed by Lee and Kobayashi (1973) for rigid-plastic materials, proved to be a very useful tool in metal forming simulations. Neglecting the elastic part of deformation appeared to have insignificant influence on the results in a majority of processes involving large plastic deformations. Predictions of the kinematics of the process as well as the tool pressures, using the rigid-plastic approach, coincided very well with experimental observations, see for example Glowacki and Pietrzyk (1989) and Sadok et al. (1991). The stresses during loading are calculated properly, as well. Additionally, neglecting the elastic deformations reduced the computation time by approximately an order of magnitude. All these advantages made the rigid-plastic formulation an efficient method for the modeling of metal forming processes. There are, however, numerous examples of processes in which the THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
112 elastic response of the deforming metal is expected to have significant influence on the resuhs of the simulation. The incremental form of the virtual work principle, using a Prandtl-Reuss elasticplastic constitutive law, is used in these cases. Thompson and Berman (1984), Liu et al. (1985) and Pillinger (1992) give typical examples of the application of this model to the simulation of rolling processes. They will not be discussed here. An alternative approach suitable for the steady state rolling processes is based on the Eulerian-updated Lagrangian formulation. Details of this solution are given by Malinowski (1993) and by Malinowski and Lenard (1993), and these will be described briefly below. 5.2.1
Constitutive relations
The material is assumed to be and remain homogeneous and isotropic during forming. It obeys the Huber-Mises criterion of plastic flow. Since elastic deformation is not ignored, the material's constitutive behavior is described by the Prandtl-Reuss relation (Washizu, 1975) giving the Jaumann rate of stress:
where the multiplier a, defined as: a = 1, when a=ap
and 5,j£)y> 0,
(5.21)
a = 0, when a < a^ and 5/^,y < 0,
(5.22)
is chosen to indicate whether the material is in the elastic or the elastic-plastic state. Thy symbols in Eq. (5.20) have the following meaning: E is the Young modulus, v is Poisson's ratio, Sij is the Kronecker delta. A/ is the rate of deformation tensor, G is the shear modulus, H is the plastic hardening modulus, and Stj is the deviator of the stress tensor. The parameter H is given in terms of the yield stress <jp and the effective plastic strain Stp as: H--^
(5.23)
The Jaumann rate of stress Tij is related to the material derivative t^j by (Chakrabarty, 1987): o
t,j=Tij + a>,,T^-T,^(Oj^
(5.24)
where (Otj represent the components of the spin tensor. Weak formulation of the problem for the rolling process assumes that the deformation power consists of two components: MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
113 W = W,^+W^
(5.25)
Thefirstone describes the power dissipated by the elastic-plastic flow and is given by:
K^l'^iPa'^
(5.26)
V
The second component in Eq. (5.25) represents the power dissipated due to the friction between the roiled strip and the roll and is estimated by:
Wf=\r\Av\dS s
(527)
where r = {m/ynjcTp, representing the shear stress at the roll/strip interface. The norm of the velocity discontinuity JAu^ is defined as: I M = [(v.-vJ'f+(v,-v«f]«-'
(5.28)
where the components of the roll surface velocity are designated by v", v°. The components of the kinematically admissible velocity field are given by V] and vj. The problem then becomes one of finding the stress field and the velocity field, which minimize the deformation power, Eq. (5,25). According to Eq. (5.20), the stress field is a function of the velocity field. Thus, at this point in the derivation, the solution of the elasticplastic flow problem with respect to the velocity and the stress fields involves simultaneous computation of the derivatives of the deformation power:
M
dv,
—^dV 5v,
(5.29)
Explicit evaluation of the term cT^J I ^^j is very time consuming. Since Eq. (5.24) is to be solved several times during the minimization of the deformation power, the problem is simplified by dividing the solution into two parts. First, the velocity field is determined using the principle of virtual velocities (Malvern, 1969). Then, the stress field is evaluated fi-om Eq. (5.24). The term ^ ^ 7 ^ , ^ causes computational difficulties, however, and its magnitude must be estimated. In the rigid-plastic formulation, ^ ^ 7^,^ is either ignored or its magnitude is estimated by stress increments (Kim and Young, 1985). In the present study, this problem is overcome by the use of a local Taylor series expansion of the stress field along the flow lines, leading to:
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
114
T=r+—Al
(5.30)
Since the length increment along the flow line is: dl==vdt,
(5.31)
Eq. (5.30) takes the form: (5.32)
T,.^T;^^M
where: A/ = —
(5.33)
V o
and dT ldt~ Tij is the Jaumann stress rate. o
The quantity Tij denotes the values of the components of the stress tensor Ty at a particular point a. These are assumed to be known and are evaluated in an iterative manner using the stress update algorithm, described by Malinowski and Lenard (1993). Thus, TJ represents the stresses caused by the deformation experienced by the material on its way to point a. Substituting Eq. (5.32) into Eq. (5.26) gives:
W^^^j^T^^Ath?JD,jdV
(5.34)
Note that Eq. (5.34) is an implicit updated Lagrangian scheme for rotation-free deformation. This is not surprising considering that the implicit updated Lagrangian formulation must lead to an Eulerian approach. The problem with Eq. (5.34) is that it violates the requirement of the principle of objectivity over a final time step At for an arbitrary motion, since the quano
tity Tij is not frame indifferent. However, Eq. (5.34) may be reformulated to give a frame indifferent expression. After the introduction of the effective stress <j,, the effective rate of deformation ^, and the mean stress am as:
3
r
'^•=l2VvJ
(5.35)
^-=(|A;A;)'
(5.36)
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
115
(5.37)
-a.,
CT„ =
Eq. (5.34) is rewritten to yield:
w
^j^a^'Si+AiH V
EAt {D^y dV *(^,)V^I <^*.+ 3(1-2v)
(5.38)
whei H
—-^
H'
3E ~2(l + v)
fora=l,
fora=0.
r=
(5.39)
(5.40)
(5.41)
In Eq. (5.36) D* is the deviator of the rate of deformation tensor. The superscript a is introduced to indicate that a quantity is referred to the tensor T°. Note that by the definition of the effective stress and effective rate of deformation, the non-dimensional quantity y equals 1 for loading and -1 for unloading. Further, a^'^is equal to the yield stress in the plastic region, while in the elastic region, af is lower than the yield stress or equal to zero for unstressed material. The first integral in Eq. (5.38) represents the deviatoric components of the deformation power and the second gives the power dissipated due to elastic volume changes. To show that Eq. (5.38) is equivalent to Eq. (5.34), the term: (5.42) is evaluated first. Introducing the deviators: (5.43) (5.44) Eq. (5,42) takes the form
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
116 7;;Z), = (5,; +S,a:)^D; +^5,D,, j = S^D; +alD^
(5.45)
Multiplying both sides of the expression S;D;=W,
(5.46)
by the quantity s°D* gives:
|4.,;J|z)-A;] = fF.4^;
(5.47)
or in an equivalent form:
(a;£j=r,*,p'
(5.48)
Combination of Eq. (5.46) and Eq. (5.48) leads to: ^,;A;=<^<-^
s^iy;
(5.49)
Since: S^D; = S;D,
(5.50)
and due to equations (5.41), (5.45) and (5.49), the Eq. (5.42) takes the form: T^Dy=r cj^s.+alD^
(5.51)
To prove that: (5.52) Eq. (5.20) is multiplied by A/Z)^, which leads to: (5.53) Now using Eq. (5.36) and recalling that: MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
117
(5.54)
Eq. (5.53), after some manipulations, yields: AtT,jD,=
3E
W^f'"'"*'"• 2(l + v)
9G' -a- 3G + H
(5.55)
The term in the square brackets in Eq. (5.55) is precisely the elastic-plastic hardening modulus H*, defined by Eq. (5.40) for purely elastic behavior and by Eq. (5.39) for elasticplastic loading. Note that: H^—^de.^
3EH* 3E-H*2{l + v)
(5.56)
The expression, Eq. (5.56), can be easily derived from a uniaxial compression or tension test of an axisymmetric sample, provided the elastic deformation is also accounted for. In the work of Malinowski and Lenard (1993), Poisson's ratio is assumed to be a continuous material function defined both for elastic and elastic-plastic behavior. It is given by:
(5.57)
-(^max-^o)eXp
where Vmax, H), p and X are material constants. Application of the principle of virtual velocities (Malvern, 1969; Washizu, 1975) to the deformation power, Eq. (5.48), now yields:
n(v,)=j Y
ale, +^AtH'ef <«^ + j k ^ * . + ^ ( ^ ^ a k
+ MWdS (5.58)
wherecr,'',cr^ and / are assumed to be known and are changed only when the stress field is updated. Therefore, the deformation power is expressed in terms of the unknown velocity field only. Solution of the variational problem, Eq. (5.58), involves searching, among arbitrary velocity fields, for the one which satisfies the boundary condition: v„ = 0
on St
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
(5.59)
118 and causes the definite integrals of Eq. (5.59) to remain stationary. These integrals represent a functional in the sense that the objective of the minimization of that equation is tofindthe unknown functions Vx(x, y) and Vy(x, y). The velocity field is understood to be kinematically admissible and the stress field to be statically admissible, quantities which are sometimes denoted by v* and T* to distinguish them from the exact ones. Discretization of this solution is performed in the Eulerian reference frame (Malinowski and Lenard, 1993). The geometry of the deformed strip and the distribution of the dependent variables are not known a priori. An iterative procedure involving updating of the geometry, strain and stress fields is to be employed in the finite-element scheme. It is accomplished by placing the nodes of the elements on the streamlines: f
= v.(x,^)
f
= v.(x,>')
(5.60)
when steady state flow is reached. The Runge-Kutta method is used to solve Eq. (5.60). For intermediate solutions, only the y co-ordinates of the nodes are updated and only some fraction of the displacements, predicted by Eq. (5.60), is being added to the previous solution, as follows: y-^-0)y,^ey,^,
(5.61)
where A: is the solution number, and ^ is the coefficient between 0 and 1. The case of ^ — 0 indicates that the geometry is not updated. As discussed above, the velocity field is formulated in spatial co-ordinates. Although the linear elements may be used for the velocity field discretization, 9-node elements have been shown to be more accurate for highly non-linear problems. Heinrich and Zienkiewicz (1977) and Malinowski and Lenard (1993) use such elements. Updating the stresses is accomplished in two steps. It is assumed first that material is inelastic, allowing significant simplification of the functional (5.58) by taking al = 0. Thus, the effective stress a" is equal to the yield stress, which can be calculated from any strain-hardening curve. In consequence, the firs step of stress updating involves adding to the Eq. (5.60) the term: -~ = re,{x,y)
(5.62)
with the values evaluated at the Gauss points in the last step. Following this current stress is determined from the hardening curve. The maximum value of Poisson's ratio y= Vmax is used at this stage of the calculations to ensure material incompressibility. The second step of the stress-updating algorithm is used when the steady-state flow for the inelastic solution is reached. This involves an integration of Eq. (5.24), which can be accomplished in several ways. One possibility is to add equations (5.24) and (5.62) to (5.60), define the stress tensor Tij as an integral over a flow line, and evaluate this tensor at Gauss iteration points or at the nodes of linear elements for the last step. This method is efficient but does not satisfy the
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
equilibrium conditions and does not allow the satisfaction of the boundary conditions cr„ = 0 and r= 0. A less efficient approach involves the solution of Eq. (5.24) in the form: dZ, -^v,^Tij-^co,J,j-T,,(D,j
(5.63)
leading to the fulfillment of the equilibrium and boundary conditions. The stress field is discretized, and for the plane strain problem in the (xi, xi) co-ordinate system, the values of stress tensor at the nodes are determined from the minimum condition of the functional:
^^^^^ •^[^"^^ " ^^^ ""'^^^^^ ^ ^^^^^^ dV^
v,-Tn-0),J,^+T,,(o,^ -v^-T22-o),J,,-^T,,6},,
clV + dV
(5.64)
under constraints: —^ = 0 dx,
<j„ A r = 0
in F
(5.65)
<1
(5.66)
on
St
(5.67)
for the initial condition Tjj = 7].° on So, with SQ being the part of the surface on which the stress tensor components are known. The penalty method is used to impose the constraints, Eq. (5.65), (5.66) and (5.67). Malinowski and Lenard (1993) present details of the elastic-plastic solution for steady state rolling. The results, including distributions of the stress tensor components and distributions of the roll pressure and fnction stress in the roll gap, are presented later.
5.3
HEAT TRANSFER
A complete analysis of rolling processes also requires the simulation of heat transfer in the roll gap, making it necessary to couple the solution for the flow formulation with the thermal model. Temperatures are calculated, accounting for heat conduction in the material, heat gen-
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
120 eration due to the plastic work, friction, and heat losses due to transfer to the surrounding medium. 5.3.1
Variational approach
The general principles of this approach can be demonstrated by the non-steady state solution of the diffusion equation: V{kVT)+Q = c^p^
(5.68)
where k is the conductivity, T is the temperature, Q is the heat generated due to plastic work, p is the density, Cp is the specific heat, and t is the time. Solution of Eq. (5.68) must satisfy the specified boundary conditions. There are three commonly used types of boundary conditions which are applicable to the simulation of forming processes, see for example, Pietrzyk and Lenard, (1991): • •
the temperature is prescribed along the boundary surface and, in a general case, it is a function of both time and position; the nonnal derivative of the temperature is prescribed at the boundary surface and may be a function of both time and position: k ^ =q
•
(5.69)
where q is the heat generated at the boundary; and the normal derivative of the temperature is prescribed at the boundary surface and is a function of surface temperature of the workpiece as well as of both time and position: * | ^ = «(^-^o)
(5.70)
where n is the unit vector normal to the surface, q is the heat generated at the boundary, r is the surface temperature of the workpiece, a is the heat transfer coefficient, and 7i is the temperature of the surrounding medium. The boundary condition given by Eq. (5.69) is used to account for the heat generated due to boundary friction. The heat flux q is then given by: ^ = TAV
(5.71)
where r is the friction stress, and Av is the slip velocity. The boundary condition given by Eq. (5.70) is used to account for the influence of heat transfer to the tool, as well as the heat flux due to air or water cooling of the workpiece. Details regarding the choice of the heat transfer coefficient a, for various cooling conditions are MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
121 given in Chapter 3, including specific numerical values for cold and hot rolling of aluminum and steel alloys, under laboratory or industrial conditions. The usual solution of Eq. 5.68 is based on the variational principle (Zienkiewicz, 1977), which states that a minimum of the general ftmctional:
-rt-^'f-D^lK-^-f-fh
(5.72)
is obtained when the temperature field T(xy) satisfies Euler's equations:
dF dT'
d{VT)
aG
dG
=0
in V (5.73)
dT
a(vr)J
=0
on S
The solution of Eq. (5.68) with the relevant boundary conditions, Eq. (5.69) and (5.70), is then reduced to the search for a functional for which Euler's equations become identical to Eq. (5.68). It is quite straightforward to show that the functional:
H
-QT\dV-
iK^'-f)
T + qT\iS
(5.74)
gives, on minimization, the satisfaction of the problem set in Eq. (5.68), as well as the boundary conditions given by equations (5.69) and (5.70). The algebraic manipulations verifying the above are presented by Zienkiewicz (1977). In Eq. (5.74) Q is given by:
Q^Q-c,p—ar dt
Discretization is performed in the usual finite-element manner. The temperature inside an element is presented as a dmction of the nodal values according to the following interpolation formula:
r = X^,7;=nt
(5.75)
where t is a vector of nodal temperatures, T, represents the components of the vector of nodal temperatures, n is a vector of shape functions and A^/represents the shape functions. Substitution of Eq. (5.75) into Eq. (5.74) yields:
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
122
(2:f^ •^fef^^" jW^o -\T^J^1:^J^
(5.76)
^qLNj,
Minimization of the functional (5.76) requires the calculation of the partial derivatives with respect to nodal temperatures, resulting in the following set of linear equations:
dJ
j4i&^l^*xft^1^V-ffi«,--j(-.^*,^ [dy 'J dy
(5.77)
-jaY,{NJ,)NjdS = 0 Eq. (5.77), written in a matrix form, is: Ht = p
(5.78)
where:
P,=j{aT,+q)N,dS + JQN,dV Since the rate of heat generation due to plastic work Q and the heat generated due to friction losses q are generally given in the form of nodal values, it is often more convenient to write the vector p as:
P^~-l «:roA^,+ZK^/K
k+jzMyk^
(5.79)
Eq. (5.78) consists of a set of linear equations, the solution of which gives the values of the nodal temperatures Ti during a stationary thermal state when oT/^ = 0 and g = g. However, non-stationary heat transfer problems are often involved in the modeling of hot and cold rolling. A time-varying solution is usually obtained by the modal method or by direct temporal integration. Because of the non-linearity of the problem and possible steep transients, the latter approach is preferable in metal forming when using coupled thermal-mechanical solutions, and is discussed briefly below. During finite but reasonably short time intervals, the partial derivatives of the temperature in the non-steady state can be considered as fiinctions of the X and;/ co-ordinates only. Then the solution to Eq. (5.68) is obtained as described, from: MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
123
Ht + C — t - p = 0 dt ^
(5.80)
where: C,j^lN,c^pN,dV
(5.81)
The assumption that in one time step At, the nodal temperatures are linear with respect to time leads to:
.=(...«.){.;;]
(5.82)
where linear shape functions are: N.=
At-i At
'
At
and At designates a time interval, / is the time and t, and t/+i are the nodal values of temperature for / = 0 and t = At, respectively. Using Eq. (5.82), the derivative of the temperature with respect to time can be expressed as: dt^ldNo dN,\\t^\^ dt [ dt ' dt l i t
1 {-1,1} At
(5.83)
and since the vector of nodal temperatures t, is known, only one weighted residual is required to allow for the integration of Eq. (5.80) with respect to time. The integral to be evaluated then becomes:
W^'-ithn^mthh Introduction of the shape functions, given by Eq. (5.83), into Eq.
(5.84)
(5.84), yields:
M^''*i-]-*'-''-•••'£-">••'
(5.85)
Rearrangement of Eq. (5.85) gives the final equation, which is linear with respect to t/+i, as follows:
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
124 (5.86)
^^+jicy.,=[-^-'~c\^<+^p Eq. (5,86) can be written in the form:
(5.87)
Ht = p where: H = 2H + — C At
PH-H.-C
t,-3p
In Eq. (5.87) t represents the vector of nodal temperatures (t/>i) at the end of time interval At. This vector can be calculated from Eq. (5.87), provided that the initial nodal temperatures t; at / = 0 are known. The solution presented above is known as the Galerkin scheme. Different integration schemes can be applied to solve Eq. (5.68) with the boundary conditions, indicated by Eq. (5.69) and (5.70), depending on the description of the matrices H, C, t and p during the time interval At (see for example Zienkiewicz, 1977; or Sluzalec, 1992). In general, the simplest kinds of integration schemes are one step schemes in which a two-level difference approximation is chosen for time derivative oft and a linear variation of H, C and p is assumed during At. Thus, from Eq. (5.80) one obtains: dt. dt
= - C ' H t + C ^p
(5.88)
Accounting for the changes of H, C and p during At yields:
^ ^ = (- c-^H,t, + c-^p, Xi -e)^{- c-,\H,,,t,,,+cr,\p,,0^
(5.89)
Eq. (5.89) contains the coefficient 0, which can be selected by the analyst. The value of this coefficient determines the type of integration scheme used. Rearranging Eq. (5.89) gives the vector of nodal temperatures at the end of the time interval At as:
t,,,={i+Atoc7l,n,,y[i,. ^Ate{c-l,p,,,yAt{\~ei-c-%t, +c-^p,)l
(5.90)
Assuming further that: H,+i = H/ = H;
C,+i = Ct = C
and
pj+i = p, = p,
Eq. (5.88) is written as:
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
125
^
^
^
(5.91)
^ ^" ^^^"" P ^ ^ " ^^"^ ^" ^^^^^ •" P^^
Rearranging Eq. (5.91) yields:
H(I-^)-—c t,=P
H(9 + — C At
(5.92)
Thus, matrices H and p in Eq. (5.87) are: H = H(9 + — C At
^
^ At
t.-p
(5.93)
Values of 0 and the relevant equations obtained for various integration schemes are given in Table 5.1. Table 5.1 Coefficient ^and matrices H and p for various integration schemes A
0
matrix H
0
H = —C At
A
1 2 2 3
A
vector p
1
A
p=
Scheme
H-Lc
'"" ^
Euler explicit (forward) conditionally stable
'" ^
trapezoidal or Crank-Nicholson (mid point rule) unconditionally stable
A
H = H +—C
^t J
A
H = 2H + — C1
P=
P=
At
Galerkin
H - i - C '" P unconditionally stable At
A
1
H=
H +—cl
^^ J
P=
'~P
fully implicit or Euler backward unconditionally stable
The relationships in Table 5.1 describe the matrices for the set of Eq. (5.87) for various integration schemes. However, the Galerkin scheme with 0 = 2/3 is used in all examples in the present manuscript. Matrices H and C are assumed to be equal to their values at the beginning of the time interval At. When changes of the boundary conditions are known a priori, the vector p is calculated as: 1 2 P-P.^jP,.
(5.94)
A detailed description of all the integration schemes described above and an analysis of their stability are given by Sluzalec, (1992). THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
126 The non-steady state model should be applied to simulate the temperature distribution during reverse rolling of ingots or billets, when the effect of cooling of the ends is significant. Pietrzyk and Lenard (1988) present an example of the application of the non-steady state model to the simulation of three-dimensional temperature fields during rolling of rectangular slabs. 5.3.2
Steady-state model with convection
In the majority of rolling processes, including all those that are continuous, steady-state conditions can be assumed to exist. The Eulerian mesh is then used in the solution and the convection term is introduced in Eq. (5.68) to account for the mass flow. This approach allows efficient modeling of heat transfer during rolling, and leads to significant savings of computation times. While the convection-diffusion equation is the mathematical model for steady state rolling phenomena, it also represents a good model for the development of numerical methods that provide the approximate solutions of more complicated transport equations. There are, however, several numerical difficulties connected with accounting for the convection term in finite element formulations. This problem is discussed in more detail below. The typical convection-diffusion equation for a steady state problem is of the form: V{kVT)^Q = c^py'' VT
(5.95)
where v is the vector of velocities. Serious difficulties are encountered when solving Eq. (5.95). When the convection term in this equation becomes significant, the standard Galerkin formulation fails and numerical oscillations of the solution occur. These oscillations can only be avoided after a drastic refinement of the finite element mesh. The lack of stability shown by the Galerkin formulation in these cases is the explanation for the unrealistic behavior of the numerical solution. The analytical solution of the discrete equations, obtained for the one-dimensional convectiondiffusion equation, also occasionally exhibits the same problem. Several numerical methods have been introduced in order to overcome the oscillations. Codina (1993) discusses these methods in detail and one of them, suggested by Hughes and Brooks (1982), is presented briefly in this Chapter. This method is known as SUPG, the Streamline Upwind/Petrov-Galerkin approach. Almost simultaneously, Johnson et al. (1984), who suggested the name Streamline Diffusion (SD), performed a mathematical analysis of this method. The use of this method has become widespread and while the name SD prevails over SUPG in mathematical circles, the SUPG is in general preferred, (Hugh, 1987; Codina, 1993). Therefore, the latter option will also be used in this chapter. The Streamline Upwind/Petrov-Galerkin approach can be easily presented for the onedimensional steady-state convection-diffusion problem. Extending the solution to other problems, such as multidimensional, transient or other transport equations, can also be performed. Initially, the Galerkin solution for the one-dimensional, steady-state equation using linear elements will be presented here. This simple case provides an understanding for the development of the numerical procedure applied here. Eq. (5.33) for a one-dimensional, stationary and homogeneous convection-diffusion problem with the second and third kind of boundary conditions given by Eq. (5.69) and (5.70), becomes: MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
127 , d^^T
dT
^
0<x
Af = ^+a(r-r„)
X=0
(5.96)
and
x=l
(5.97)
where k is the conductivity, v is the velocity, and / is the length of the domain. The procedure is as follows. Let 0 = xo < x; < ... < jcjv = / be a uniform partition of the interval [0, /], with Xm+i' Xm = h, m = 0, ..., rie - 1. It can be shown (see for example Zienkiewicz, 1977), that the character of the numerical solution of the convection-diflusion problem depends on the value of the Peclet number. This number, for a single finite element in a one-dimensional problem, is defined as Pe = vh/2k. The Peclet number is a dimensionless parameter, indicating the relative importance of convection and difRision. Convection is dominant when Pe is large, whereas diffusion will prevail for small values of Pe. An examination of the analytical solution of equations (5.96) and (5.97) for large Pe reveals that, depending on the sign of Pe, the boundary layers develop near JC = / (Pe > 0) or near x = 0 OPe < 0). The sign of Pe depends on the sign of the velocity v. The slope of the fimction Twill be very steep in these zones and numerical problems can be anticipated if one tries to approximate it with too few discretization points. If the equations (5.96) and (5.97) are solved numerically, using linear finite elements and the standard Galerkin method, the following difference equations are found: (l-Pe)r„,,-2r„-f(H-Pe)7;„_,=0
/w=l.
(5.98)
where Tm is the nodal unknown value of the temperature at the point m. If the exact solution of equations (5.96) and (5.97) is introduced in Eq. (5.98) and is expanded in a Taylor series, onefindsthat (Codina, 1993):
^ dx
dx^
+k
dxA
(5.99)
where:
^* ^ ~wJ\h^''''^^^^^^^~ l ] - sinh(2Pe)|
(5.100)
The truncation error of the scheme, Eq, (5.98), is: E=k'
.d^T\ dx'
(5.101)
It can be shown that A:* -^ 0 when Pe -> 0 and sgn(k*) = sgn(k). As observedfi-omEq. (5.99), Eq. (5.98) gives the exact solutions at the nodes for the modified equation: THE FINITE ELEMENTMETHOD IN METAL FORMING
128
y^^{k-k*)^ =0 etc dx
(5.102)
The fact that k - k* < k gives a first explanation for the failure of the Galerkin method. This method solves exactly the under-diffusive equation or, equivalently, it introduces an artificial negative diffusion. Since, as seen from Eq. (5.100), an increase of Pe leads to an increase of k*, oscillations of the solution can be expected when Pe -> oo. Other methods of presentation of the unusual behavior of the Galerkin approach, discussed by Codina (1993), include solving exactly the difference equations (5.98) or computing their eigenvalues. The discussion presented above shows that any method that attempts to eliminate the instability problems of the Galerkin formulation must introduce, in one way or another, an artificial dissipation. The simplest approach is to include diffusion in the original continuous equation, and then use the Galerkin approach to solve this modified equation. Although this idea goes back to early finite difference methods, thefiindamentaljustification of this approach, in the context of the finite element technique, was performed by Kikuchi (1977). He suggested the introduction of artificial diffusion as a way to satisfy the discrete maximum principle. This idea was also introduced in the finite difference solutions of von Neumann and Richtmyer, (1950), and Roache, (1972). The dissipation can be introduced by means of a noncentered difference approximation for the first derivatives, taking into account the direction of the flow, that is, the sign of v in Eq. (5.96). This fact motivated the name upwind methods for the numerical formulations, based on a modification of centered schemes according to the flow direction. Richtmyer and Morton (1967) give the fundamentals of this method, and more details regarding applications to forming processes can be found in the studies of Heinrich et al., (1977) and Heinrich and Zienkiewicz, (1977). The introduction of artificial diffusion can be performed using the concept of an upwind function. Here, numerical dissipation is assumed to have the form: vh k =a -
(5.103)
where a is the a function of the Peclet number, which is to be determined and will be called an upwind function. If the diffusion k is added to the real diffusion k in Eq. (5.96) and the standard Galerkin method is applied, the following equation is introduced instead of Eq. (5.98): [1 + Pe(a - l)]r,^i - 2(1 + a FC)T„ + [l + Pe(a + 1)]T„., = 0
(5.104)
and the resulting truncation error is:
^' ^ ~ i k f e ^ " ] Icosh(2Pe)-1]- s i n h ( 2 P e ) | ^ |
(5.105)
If the condition Er = Ois imposed, the following expression for the function a results: MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
129
a = coth(Pe)-—
(5.106)
Since the truncation error is zero for this choice of a, the numerical solution will be exact at the nodes. The error of the scheme will be equal to the error of the canonical projection of the analytical solution onto the discrete finite element space. For this reason, the function (5.106) is called optimal. If thefiniteelements are used, the weak form of problem (5.96)(5.97) is to be introduced. Multiplying Eq. (5.96) by a suitable test function w [with w{0) = w{l) = 0] and an integration by parts yields: J ; . v 5 ^ . } r . . a ^ H ^ = f r i . . a ^ ^ l v ^ ^ J ; t ^ ^ . . =0 i dx l{ IJdxdx l{ 2dx) dx I dx dx
(5.107) ^
From Eq. (5.107) the scheme (5.104) is obtained, providing that the weighting function: w = N + a^^ 2 ax
(5.108)
is applied only for the convection term The resulting formulation belongs to the class of Petrov-Galerkin methods. These functions can be presented by means of intrinsic time for an element: - | i
(5.109)
yielding: dN w = N + Tv (5.110) dx Numerical experiments indicate that a proper evaluation of a greatly influences the accuracy, but not the stability of the results. Over-diffusive answers are found if this function is overestimated, whereas oscillations may occur if too small an estimate is employed. The upwind functions a must be of the form: a(Pe)={7^ [ Cj
as as
Pe-.0 Pe-^oo
^^^^^^
It is assumed in the analysis that the (0,1) interval is discretized using a uniformfiniteelement partition with elements of length h. Thus, the Peclet number and thefimctiona will be the same for all elements. From Eq. (5.108) and (5.110):
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
130 -,
a/? / \dN (5.112) N-^--sgn(v)-— 2 ax where a depends on the Peclet number Pe. The function w is considered optimal if the finite element solution obtained with the weighting functions, given by Eq. (5.112), yields exact values at the nodes of the elements. Extending the analysis to two or three dimensions does not present particular difficulties (Codina, 1993). Introduction of upwinded weighting functions into the solution of Eq. (5.95) facilitates the steady-state approach for the rolling processes even for high velocities, usually encountered in continuous hot strip mills. The solution yields Eq. (5.78) with t being the vector of nodal temperatures. The matrices H and p are given by: w=
vL
dx dx,
dy fy ) -f^i
dN,
cNj^
ac
'' dy )
P,=lw,QdV + lwXq + T,)dS
dV + jaw^NjdS
(5.113a)
(5.113b
The solution of Eq. (5.78) requires additional data connected with the rates of heat generation. These are supplied by the first component of the model, described in the previous section. They are concerned with the determination of the velocity, strain rate, strain and stress distribution, using one of the methods also described in the previous sections. The rate of heat generation should take into account both the positive and negative effects of dislocation density as described by Rebelo and Kobayashi (1980). The relevant equation is:
e=J
- vAe^ + vBp exp — ^ IdV
(5.114)
where v. A, B are material constants, R is the gas constant, o;, e is the effective stress and effective strain rate, respectively, T is the absolute temperature, Qr is the activation energy for recrystallization, and p is the dislocation density. In cold forming processes the accumulation of energy plays an important role and has a noticeable influence on the temperature rise as a result of plastic work. In hot forming, this problem becomes less important and the heat exchange with the surrounding media plays a more significant role than does the energy accumulated in the metal. Therefore, in hot forming processes the whole work of plastic deformation is assumed to be converted into heat and the associated errors are expected to be insignificant. 5.3.3
Thermal properties and boundary conditions
The accuracy of the simulation of temperature fields, that develop during plastic deformation processes, depends, in a very significant manner, on the mathematical description of the thermal properties of the deformed material and the boundary conditions. The conductivity, specific heat and density of the metal should be introduced into the finite-element programs as MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
131 functions of the current local temperatures. These functions, obtained for various materials on the basis of experimental data, published by Touloukian and Buyco (1970), Touloukian et al, (1970a) and Touloukian et al, (1970b), as well as on the basis of experimental analysis, are given in Table 5.2. The thermal boundary conditions used in the simulations, including the heat transfer coefficient, have been discussed in Chapter 3.
Table 5.2 Thermal properties of various materials material conductivity W/m 1Q^
23.16 + 51.96exp - 2 . 0 3 7
carbonmanganese steel
high carbon steel
austemtic steel aluminum alloys bronze
specific heat J/kgK
density kg/m^ 7850
689.2 + 46.2exp 3.787
r
forr<700°C
1 + 0.0047 V
23.16+51.96exp -2.0257
207.9 +294.4 exp[ 1.417 for7>700°C 391 + 0,2027^^ for7<700^C 586-0.467j,+0.000767;? for7>700°C
7850 .2\
1 + 0.0047
21.9 + 14.37
7850
236 + 337
2840
113.6 + 101.67
7850
474+1977+3.797 -59.67
836.8 + 1977+3.797 -59.67 385.4-0.3567j^ +0.003287; for7<210^C 866-3.57^+0.00867^
1 + 0.05527
-0.63x10-^7^ copper
332 + 107
8900
444 + 65.87-1.888 7+0.273
1 + 0.01527
Tj, = 7 + 273
for7>700T
7=-
1000
y, =0.334 + 0.8367+1.1697 -0.45867 ;K2 =-0.000457 + 0.02343 7+0.0034937+0008277
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
132 5.4
CASE STUDIES
The discretization of the mechanical portion of the finite-element model is performed using 4-node quadrilateral elements. The mesh and boundary conditions for a general case of asymmetrical rolling are shown in Figure 5.1. The philosophy of the boundary conditions follows that in Figure 2.38. Notation used in Figure 5.1 is: a is the heat transfer coefficient for the roU-workpiece interface, Oaw is the heat transfer coefficient for air or water cooling, P is the angle of plate entry into the roll gap, / i s the angle between the tangent to the roll surface and the horizontal axis, r^, Xx are the boundary traction, v^, Vx are components of the velocity vector, // is the friction coefficient,
Vy=Vxtg7 TyS/zcTpSin 7 Tx = T y = 0
<;p=a(T-To)+qJ
-rx«Ty=0
^=aa^(T-To)
f<^«a/v
t<;g>=<^awO"-i"oj|
Tx=Ty=0
<;p=a(T-To)-K|
Figure 5.1 Finite-element mesh and boundary conditions for a general case of flat rolling The discretization of the thermal part of the problem is performed using the same 4-node quadrilateral elements. In some cases, involving very steep temperature gradients, especially near the surfaces of the rolled samples, 12-node quadrilateral elements are used and the meshes for thermal and mechanical solutions are identical in the comer nodes. Using 12-node elements for the thermal part allows for a more accurate simulation of the temperature gradients in the deformation zone, while the memory required to store the conductivity matrix H remains approximately equal to that necessary to store the tangent stiffness matrix K. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
133 5.4.1
Hot rolling of steel
Hot rolling of a 50 mm thick C-Mn steel slab, reduced by 25% in one pass, is presented below. The slab is heated to a uniform temperature of 1050°C and cooled for 15 seconds in air. The process parameters are: roll radius 340 mm, roll velocity 22 rpm, and the friction coefficient is 0.25. Shida's equations (Shida, 1979), describing the yield stress as a fiinction of the carbon content, temperature, strain rate and strain, are used as the constitutive model. Figures 5.2 and 5.3 show the strain rate, effective strain, average stress and temperature distributions. Strain rate concentrations, characteristic of the rolling process, are observed at the initial contact point between the roll and the plate. The shear strain rate concentrations near the contact cause a non-uniform strain distribution. The largest strains appear near the surface.
effective strain rate, s*''
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
X, mm shear strain rate, S'^
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
X, mm
Figure 5.2 Calculated distributions of effective strain rate, shear strain rate and effective strain for hot rolling of steel THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
134
X, mm Figure 5.3 Calculated distributions of average stress and temperature during hot rolling of steel
Analysis of the average stress field in Figure 5.3 shows that compressive stresses appear almost in the whole deformation zone. Some tensile stresses are observed at the entry plane at the center of the plate and at the exit close to the surface. The temperature field, also shown in Figure 5.3, agrees with the numerous experimental data presented by Pietrzyk and Lenard (1991). As expected, the coolest part of the plate is the one near the contact zone and a sharp temperature gradient towards the plate center is observed. Low rate of heat loss of the central portion, before entering to the roll gap, is also noticed. Recall that the plate was heated to a uniform temperature of 1050°C in the furnace and then cooled for 15 seconds in air. The plate also experiences some heating in the roll gap, the result of the work done on the plastically deforming metal. The thermal-mechanical finite-element model described in this chapter has also been validated under industrial conditions. Simulation of hot rolling a C-Mn steel strip, rolled in 12 passes, including five roughing passes and seven continuous finishing passes, has been performed. The rolling parameters and results of calculations are given in Table 5.3. Rows marked "pyro" or "coil" in this table contain temperatures measured by an optical pyrometer (first number) and the calculated surface temperatures at this point (second number). The final column in Table 5.3 contains the resuhs of calculations of the austenite grain size, which have been performed using the microstructure evolution model, described in the next chapter.
^M THEMA TJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
135 Table 5.3 The results of simulation of the hot strip rolling process aver, No thickn. red. roll interpass roll torque force time diameter temp velocity mm mm s kN/mm Nm/mm rpm 150.00 1314 95.1 120.00 0.200 1 940.0 9.4 1268 21.00 7.9 730 72.00 0.400 2 18.7 911.0 1256 20.00 1310 9.8 54.00 0.250 3 910.0 14.4 1228 33.00 610 7.3 46.00 0.148 4 14.0 655.7 71.00 1195 200 4.1 35.00 0.239 5 614.8 40.5 71.00 1160 6.1 320 pyro 1097/1087 24.20 0.309 749.0 6 10.8 987 4.9 28.32 610 13.97 0.423 7 2.6 631.8 58.17 12.7 970 650 8 11.99 0.142 2.4 647.5 957 66.13 100 4.4 9.48 0.209 9 1.9 663.5 938 81.62 180 6.9 7.36 0.224 10 1.4 652.0 924 170 106.99 7.3 6.16 0.163 11 632.3 131.81 908 1.2 90 5.2 6.00 0.026 12 679.1 3.3 893 126.00 6 1.0 pyro 881/885 coil 600/610
grain size jLun
50.3/49.6 28.0/27.5 34.7/33.6 33.3/32.4 30.3/29.6 30.6/29.8 30.6/29.8
1400 The grain size was calculated for the ] roughing train •-I + 1 u * *• front (first number) and the tail (second 1300 number) end of the plate. Figures 5.4 and 1200 5.5 show the time-temperature profiles for the rolling schedule of Table 5.3. Two val- o 1100 o ues of the temperature are presented, one 1000 3 at the center of the plate and the other, at 2 900 the surface. The results of measurements E using the optical pyrometer behind stands 800 number 5 and 12 are shown in Figures 5.4 700 and 5.5, as well. The tail end of the strip 600 enters the finishing train at a temperature lower, by about 60**C, than the front end. 500 1 1 1 1 \ 1 This difference disappears at the coiler, 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 due to the acceleration of the mill when time, s the front end leaves the last stand. Analysis of the results in Table 5.3 and Figure Figure 5.4 Time-temperature profiles for strip 5.4 shows that the model is capable of rolling in the roughing mill according to the simulating industrial rolling processes with rolling schedule in Table 5.3 good accuracy. Similar studies have also been performed for hot rolling of a thick niobium steel plate in a two-stand reversing mill (Pietrzyk et al., 1996) and the resuhs are presented in the next chapter together with the evolution of the microstructure.
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
136
1200
-+A
[•
measurement
ZA
1100
surface
800
"^
700
A Zl
1100
ID
surface measurement
1000 900
I 900 laminar cooling
"TO
g. E o
center
1200 centEr
[water descaier
800 4 700 600 H
600
finishing train - front end I \ 1 1 \ 1 \ r~ 500 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 time, s
500
finishing train - tail end —1 1 1 1 1 I f — 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 time, s
Figure 5.5 Time-temperature profiles for strip rolling in the finishing mill according to the rolling schedule in Table 5.3
5.4.2
Asymmetrical rolling
Simulation of the asymmetrical rolling process presents particular difficulties connected with thefi-eebending of the plate after exitfi-omthe roll gap. Asymmetric rolling is an important part of industrial rolling technology. Asymmetry can be deliberately introduced to reduce the rolling force (Sinicyn, 1984) or to control the development of a required curvature (Too and Barnes, 1989; Dyja and Pilarczyk, 1993). In many instances, however, the development of asymmetric deformation in a rolled plate is an undesirable phenomenon, and should be avoided. The asymmetry may be caused by variations in roll speed, roll diameter or roll surface conditions or by non-uniform temperature distributions or properties through the plate thickness. Bi-metallic rolling is an extreme example, where differing material properties cause asymmetric deformation. Whatever the cause of this problem, control strategies to minimize the asymmetry would be of significant industrial value. Such strategies can be developed through the use of numerical simulation techniques that examine, in detail, the effect of a very wide range of process and material parameters. Before the data can be gathered, however, the models used to generate the data must be carefully validated against experimental measurements. Published reports on asymmetric rolling (Pietrzyk, 1986; Hamauzu et al., 1987; Cao et al., 1993; Park et al., 1993; Richelsen, 1994; Lenard et al., 1994) have produced little evidence of experimental validation. Therefore, providing a careful experimental validation of the results for asymmetrical rolling is very important. The tests performed by Pietrzyk et al. (1996a) are reported briefly below. Two finite-element models are validated experimentally. These are: (i) elastic-plastic nonsteady state model by Pillinger (1992) which will be referred to as epfep3 and, (ii) a rigid-
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
m plastic steady state model described in this chapter, referred to as elroll. Both models include thermal-mechanical coupling. The experiments used for the validation include both hot and cold rolling processes. Thick aluminum plates were used in the cold rolling tests. The plates were made in two halves joined along a longitudinal, vertical mid-section. This mating face contained a grid, the deformation of which was measured after rolling in order to determine the strain distribution. The asymmetry was introduced by various roll diameters. Two diameter ratios were used (183/202 and 193/202). The smaller roll in the second set was prepared with an increased surface roughness. The rolls were ground after the cold rolling experiments and the diameter ratios in hot rolling were 182/201 and 192/201. The plates were rolled to four different reductions. The stress-strain curve of aluminum used in the models was determinedfi-omthe compression test to be: or^ =94.5 + 218.7/-^^^
(5.115)
where <jp is the flow stress, and s is the true strain. The hot rolling of thick steel samples with various thicknesses was undertaken to assess the amount of curvature, and whether the plate turned up or down. The steel composition was 0.15%C, 0.55%Mn for 6 mm thick samples and 0.17%C, 0.44%Mn for 4 mm thick samples. The hyperbolic sine equation, Eq. (3.24), with the constants K = 100, A = 2xl0'^^ m = 0.2, n = 0.2 and activation energy in the Zener-HoUomon parameter Q = 350000 J/mol, were used in the calculations for both steels. In all cases, different amounts of reduction were examined. The samples measuring 4 or 6 mm in thickness were rolled to three different reductions at various temperatures. The samples were heated to 890°C or 1 lOO^'C in the furnace, transported to the rolling mill and rolled. The air-cooling during the transport of the sample from the fiimace to the mill was included in the calculations. The time necessary to transport the sample varied between 5 and 15 s, resulting in a temperature drop of 40''C - lOO^'C, depending on the plate thickness. The roll angular velocity was 20 rpm. Cold rolling of aluminum: The resuhs of calculations of the strain distribution in the roll gap during cold rolling of aluminum strips are compared with the measurements in Figures 5.6, 5.7, 5.8 and 5.9. Symbol D in these figures represents the roll diameter. The analytical results, by elroll, were obtained using a friction coefficient of 0.2, determined from the ring compression test. The graphs show that the finite-element models predict the metal flow reasonably well. The results obtained from epfep3 account for the influence of the non-stationary part of the process, when the front end of the plate is rolled and dynamic effects are important. Beyond the stress and strain fields in the roll gap, the bending of the plate after exit is an important parameter, which is to be controlled during rolling. As shown by Pietrzyk et al. (1993) and Pietrzyk et al. (1996b), the proper prediction of the plate curvature presents significant difficulties. Comparison of the measured and predicted (by elroll) plate curvature for the current experiment is shown in Figure 5.10. Positive curvature indicates turning towards the upper (smaller) roll. Figure 5.10a demonstrates that the results are very sensitive to the fiiction coefficient used in the model. In general, the curve obtained for the friction coefficient of 0.2 gives results closest to the measurements. The largest discrepancies are observed for large reductions, probably due to the fact that in the real process, the friction coefficient THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
138 crease with increasing pressure/reduction. Figure 5.10b shows the results of calculations for a non-workhardening, ideally plastic, material, a workhardening material with the flow stress described by Eq. (5.115) and a workhardening material with a significantly increased slope of the strain-hardening curve. Figure 5.10b indicates that, as may be expected, the effect of hardening increases with increasing reduction. The most pronounced effect is observed at the point when hardening is introduced in the model, while a further increase of the intensity of hardening has a negligible influence on the bending of the plate.
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 X, mm
Figure 5.6 Comparison of the measured and calculated strain fields during asymmetric rolling of aluminum strips, using a roll diameter ratio of 184/202 mm and a reduction of 13%
prediction > epfep3 [reduction 0.13
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
X, mm
4 E E
prediction - eiroli reduction 0.13
2 0
""-2-1 -4
2
4
6
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 X, mm
The results obtained from the epfep3 program are not presented in Figures 5.10 and 5.11. As far as the epfep3 code's predictions of bending are considered, the non-steady state model showed good correlation with the low reduction experiments but did not reproduce the turndown observed at high reductions (see Figures 5.6-5.9). The curvatures predicted by epfep3 for the experimental data in Figure 5.10 were 10, 5,10 and 6 m"^ for the reductions 0.13, 0.24, 0.33 and 0.49, respectively. A friction factor of 0.4 was used in these calculations.
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
139
Figure 5.7 Comparison of the measured and calculated strain fields during asymmetric rolling of aluminum strips, using a roll diameter ratio of 184/202 mm and a reduction of 24%
-"*
i? =202 mm
15
20
30
X, mm
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
X, mm
Figure 5.8 Comparison of the measured and calculated strain fields during asymmetric rolling of aluminum plates, using a roll diameter ratio of 184/202 mm and a reduction of 33%
8^ E
E
[prediction-epfep3 reduction 0.33
X, mm ^:^:::30.50-|
^t^^^ 30
35
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
140
.Figure 5.9 Comparison of the measured and calculated strain fields during asymmetric rolling of aluminum plates, using a roll diameter ratio of 184/202 mm and a reduction of 0.49% 4i predictbn • eiroll
V\~~2:--c—P^1M mm
reduction 0.49
0 4
1
1 —
10
'!^iS--^-^''^D^2mm
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
X, mm
Q
measurement
-A—
FEM.f=0.18
-0—
FEM,f=0.20
-B—
FEM.f=0.22
f° A /S V s
nU
measurement ideal plasticity hardening, eq. (5.115) increased hardening
Figure 5.10 Measured and calculated curvature of the aluminum plate exiting the roll gap during cold asymmetric rolling (roll diameter ratio 184/202); (a) various friction coefficients; (b) various constitutive laws in the model
Similar results obtained for the roll diameter ratio of 193/202 are presented in Figure 5.11. In this experiment the smaller roll's surface roughness was increased, and because of this, the asymmetry was due to both the different diameters and the different friction coefficients. The MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
141 results show agreement for the friction coefficient of 0.18 for the larger roll and 0.21 for the smaller roll. The coincidence is good for medium reductions. The discrepancies are larger for both small reductions and heavy ones. This confirms the conclusion that the discrepancies may be due to the friction coefficient's dependence on the roll pressure and the reduction, neither of which is not accounted for in the models. This dependence, however, is somewhat controversial. Results showing both an increase of the friction coefficient with increasing reduction (Karagiozis and Lenard, 1985; Guang-Ying and Huml, 1993), and a decrease of the coefficient with increasing roll pressures (Dobrucki, 1962), or with increasing yield stress (Roberts, 1978), have been published. Beyond this, Schey (1987) shows that the maximum possible coefficient of friction decreases when interface pressures increase above the yield stress of the material. The current measurements and calculations of plate bending support the latter hypothesis. The results of calculations, carried out for the friction coefficient, varying from 0.22 for light reductions to 0.18 for heavy reductions, are shown in Figure 5.12. The improvement of the similarity between the predictions and the measurements is obvious. Hot rolling of steel: The objective of the steel rolling experiment was the as15 sessment of the model's ability to predict D measurement the bending of the plate after exit fi-om FEM,fs0.16/0.19j -2^ the roll gap. Due to a larger number of 10 H FEM,f^ai8A).21 factors affecting hot rolling (temperaFEM, fi=0.22«.25 ture, strain rate), the analysis is even more complex than for the cold rolling experiment. The results obtained for to stress-strain Eq. (3.24) and various but constant values of the friction coefficient /are shown in Figures 5.13-5.16. Analysis of the results shows that the reduction and the entry thickness are the parameters which most affect the turning -ion __l j _ I of the plate. The influence of the tem0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.1 perature, however, is negligible. The reduction qualitative agreement between the measurements and the model's predictions is Figure 5.11 Measured and calculated curvature good. Beyond the small reduction, the of the aluminum plate exiting the roll gap durmodel predicts the bending quantitatively ing cold asymmetric rolling using a roll diquite well when the friction coefficient of ameter ratio of 193/202; various friction coeffi0.2 is assumed. The discrepancies appear- cients/for the upper and the lower roll ing at the small reductions, require fiirther investigation. The validation of the finite-element codes permit several observations and conclusions regarding the application of these programs to asymmetrical rolling. The asymmetrical process is difficult to model. Indeed, an adaptation of the existing codes does not present numerical problems, but the results appear to be extremely sensitive to boundary conditions, in particular to the friction coefficient. The steady-state model clearly shows a change in the direction of the turning of the plate as the reduction increased. The non-steady state model shows good correlation with the low reduction experiments, but does not reproduce the turn-down observed at high reductions. The THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
142 models are expected to work very well for asymmetrical cold rolling with tensions, when the turning of the strip is constrained. Difficulties appear when rolling thick plates with unconstrained motion before entry to, and after exit from, the roll gap is considered.
a)
b) n ^
measurements ]
10-
prediction, FEMj
Q
measurements^
^—•
prediction, FEMj
£
f s
Figure 5.12 Curvature of the plate calculated for thefrictioncoefficient decreasing with increasing reduction compared with the measured values using a roll diameter ratio of (a) 187/202 and (b)193/202
15
thickness 6 mm temperature 850°C
10
5
thickness 4 mm temperature SOOoC
D
measurement]
-A—
FEM,f==0.15
•^—
FEM,fs0.20 I
1—B—
FEM,f=0.30 ]
[D A
measurement
ZA
FEM, f=0.15
•s
FEM. 1^0.20
\/ n I U
FEM,f=0.30
-10
-15
roil diameter ratio 182/201 0.0
n
\
0.1
0.2
1
r~
0.3 0.4 reduction
0.5
0.2
0.3 0.4 reduction
Figure 5.13 Measured and calculated curvature of the steel plate exiting the roll gap during hot asymmetric rolling, heating temperature 890*" using a roll diameter ratio of 182/201; (a) entry thickness 6 mm; (b) entry thickness 4 mm MA THEMA JJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
143
thickness 6 mm temperature 1000°C roll diameter ratio 182/201 D -^—
0.2
thickness 4 mm temperature 965°C roll diameter ratio 182/201 Q
measurement! FEM,f=0.15
-^—
FEM,f=0.20
- Q -
FEM.f^O.aO
"1 0.1
I I 0.3 0.4 reduction
\ 0.2
measurement]
^s—
FEM.f=0.15
^0—
FEM, f=0.20
g —
FEM, f=0.30
\ r 0.3 0.4 reduction
Figure 5.14 Measured and calculated curvature of the steel plate exiting the roll gap during hot asymmetric rolling, heating temperature 1100°C using a roll diameter ratio of 182/201; (a) entry thickness 6 mm; (b) entry thickness 4 mm
a)
b) thickness 6 mm temperature 800°C
15
Q
10
15
thickness 4 mm temperature 800°C Q
measurement]
10 H
-^s—
FEM,f=0.15
measurement]
7^—
FEM.f=0.15
^^—
FEM, f=0.20
g —
FEM, f=0.30
% ^
-0—
FEM,f^0.20
g—
FEM.f=0.30 J
I 0 O
-10 H
-5H
roll diameter ratio 192/201
0.0
0.1
T" ~1 0.2 0.3 0.4 reduction
~r
0.5
roll diameter ratio 192/201
-10 0.0
I 0.1
"1 0.2
r 0.3 0.4 reduction
I 0.5
Figure 5.15 Measured and calculated curvature of the steel plate exiting the roll gap during hot asymmetric rolling, heating temperature 890**C using a roll diameter ratio of 192/201; (a) entry thickness 6 mm; (b) entry thickness 4 mm Analysis of the results for the cold rolling of aluminum plates shows that the prediction of the turning of the plate after exit from the roll gap is very sensitive to the friction coefficient in the model. It is difficult to obtain good agreement betv^een the measurements and calculaTHE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
144 tions when a constant value of this coefficient is assumed. It is shown that the introduction of a coefficient, decreasing with increasing roll pressures, improves the accuracy significantly. It is observed further that, when the turning of the plate is predicted correctly, both models predict the strain fields in the roll gap reasonably well. Investigation of the sensitivity of the results to the material's resistance to deformation shows that the slope of the hardening curve has little effect on the turning of the plate. However, neglecting the hardening and assuming ideal plasticity lead to a noticeable change of the results.
a)
b) thickness 6 mm temperature 1000°C
15 10H
ID
measurement
thickness 4 mm temperature 940°C
15
Q
10 H
measurement]
A
FEM.f^0.15
-£s— FEM,f^0.15
/\ \y
FEM, f=0.20
-0—
FEM.M).20
-a-
REM. M).30
g—
FEM,f^0.30
Z^
-5H -10 H
roll diameter ratio 192/201 0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3 0.4 reduction
0.5
roll diameter ratio 192/201 ~-i 1 r~~ 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 reduction
0.0
0.5
Figure 5.16 Measured and calculated curvature of the steel plate exiting the roll gap during hot asymmetric rolling, heating temperature 1 lOO^'C, using a roll diameter ratio of 192/201; (a) entry thickness 6 mm; (b) entry thickness 4 mm
Analysis of the hot rolling of steel shows very good agreement between the measurements and calculations, as far as the character of the curvature versus reduction relationship is considered. Quantitatively, over-estimation of the curvature for very small reductions was observed in all cases. Since these reductions are not used in industrial practice, the predictive ability of the model can be considered to be good. In order to demonstrate further the abilities of the rigid-plastic finite-element thermalmechanical model as far as the simulation of asymmetrical rolling is considered, calculations for asymmetrical cold rolling of a 10 mm thick plate were performed. The remaining process parameters were as follows: lower roll radius 250 mm, upper roll radius 238 mm, entry angle 3°, friction coefficient 0.2. Calculated fields of the effective strain and the average stress are presented in Figure 5.17. The results show that due to the lack of symmetry, the plate is turning dovm at the exit. The calculated curvature is 7.8 m\ The resuhs further show that the model is capable of simulating the fields of strain rates, strains, stresses and temperatures for various asymmetrical processes, when different factors causing the lack of symmetry, such as various roll diameters, roll rotational velocities, friction coefficients of upper and lower roll etc., exist separately or together. Accounting for the asymmetry, resulting from the nonMATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
145^ uniform distribution of plate properties or temperature through the thickness, can be accounted for as well.
effective strain
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
X, mm average stress, MPa
X. mm Figure 5.17 Calculated fields of the effective strain and the average stress during asymmetrical rolling
5.4.3
Porosity closure
The increasing application of continuous casting introduces additional problems to the simulation of metal forming processes. The elimination of porosity is essential in industrial practices, and because of this, the ability to predict the behavior of voids should be one of the features of the finite-element models. The objectives of the present section are twofold. The first objective is to show an application of the finite-element model to the simulation of the behavior of a single void in a metal matrix subjected to plastic deformation. The influence of such factors as the material's strain and strain rate sensitivities on the behavior of voids is investigated. An attempt to account for the influence of the pressure of the gases in the pore on its closure is also undertaken. The second objective of the section is to analyse the behavior of the voids in industrial processes. An experimental validation of the approach is performed by comparing the results with the data of Wang et al. (1996) and Wang et al. (1997). The behavior of voids is first investigated in general, independently of the process. The assumption is made that a void is located in a uniform stress field, and a distortion of that field, caused by the void, is evaluated. This field is generated by the rigid-plastic thermalmechanical finite-element model, formulated for plane strain compression. A detailed deTHE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
146 scription of the model was given in section 5.1, and its application to the plane strain compression process is shown by Pietrzyk et al. (1993b). In order to create the uniform stress field, the width of the die is assumed to be larger than the width of the sample. Round voids, with one or two axes of symmetry, are considered. The finite element mesh used in both cases is shown in Figure 5.18. The two-dimensional model is used in the calculations. Thus, an inclusion is represented by a cylinder with a unit length and a diameter equal to that of the void. The behavior of that cylinder in the plane-strain field is assumed to be representative of the behavior of the spherical void. Results of the simulation of the behavior of voids depend on a description of the flow stress of the matrix (Pietrzyk, 1998). The following constitutive equation: A 1^ 023.0214
^38000"^
Gp =4.16£'^"f"-^*^exp\ - RT )
(5.116)
is used in the present calculations. Pietrzyk et al. (1995c) showed that the behavior of voids during the plastic deformation process also depends strongly on the state of stress, which in the current work, is expressed by the ratio of the invariants of the stress tensor /j / / j , represented by: ^^^CTi-KT;
(5.117)
where a^ and a^ are the dominant stresses.
a)
Figure 5.18 Finite element mesh for pores with two axes (a) and one axis (b) of symmetry
During compression, the required state of stress is created by imposing a relevant pressure on thefi-eesurfaces. The history of stress state, necessary for the simulation of the void's cloMATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
147 sure during rolling, has been obtained from the rigid-plastic finite-element model for the flat rolling, described in section 5.L The pressure of gases present in the void slows down the elimination of porosity and its effect should be accounted for in modeling. However, there is a certain lack of information regarding changes of this pressure. The present calculations show that for initial pressures of about 0.1 MPa, the influence of the gas pressure is observed only at the final stage of the closure. Complete closure is found to be impossible without diffiision of the gases in the metal. The relation describing the decrease of the mass of the gas in the void is suggested: M = MQ exp{-cpt)
(5.118)
where MQ is the initial mass of gas in the void, p is the pressure, / is the time, and c is a constant. Eq. (5.118) gives a qualitative description of the phenomenon only, assuming that the decrease of the mass of gases in the void is proportional to the pressure. This assumption is realistic and it should not affect the numerical results in any significant manner. Preliminary results, showing the influence of the material's properties and process parameters on the closure of the pores, are given by Pietrzyk et al. (1995c) and by Pietrzyk (1998). Further results are shown below. The relation between the strain needed to close the pore and the state of stress for various material models is shown in Figure 5.19. Accounting for the strain rate and strain sensitivity is shown to slow the elimination of the pores. The calculated decrease of the relative pore volume, during rolling of an 80 mm thick continuously cast slab in rolls with various diameters, is presented in Figure 5.20. The effect of the gas pressure in the pore, assuming an initial pressure of 0.1 MPa, is shown in this figure as well The remaining parameters are: entry temperature 1180°C, reduction 0.22, average strain rate 3.6 s\ fi-ictioncoefficient 0.25, initial porosity 7%. 0.8-
-G-
ideal plasticity
0.6
2
•
roil radius:
constitutive model (5.116)J
0.4
480 mm
-#-»..^.
350 mm
h&
230 mm
230 mm 480 mm
0.2
0.0 -5
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 stress state coefficient ^
Figure 5.19 Strain necessary to close the pore as a function of stress state and material's model
"1
1
\
r-—\
r
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 strain
Figure 5.20 Changes of the relative volume of a pore during rolling, calculated for various roll radii
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
148
—
Calculations show that larger rolls create larger average stresses in the roll gap and foster closure of the pores. The current results agree qualitatively with the studies of Keife and Stahlberg (1980) and of Tanaka et al. (1986), who concluded that the effective strain and the time integral of the hydrostatic pressure are the main factors governing the closure of voids. Validation of the model was done by a comparTable 5.4 jj^g j^^ predictions with the data of Wang et al. Predictions of pore closure compared (1995^ 1997) j^iQ experiments included the with the observations of Wang et ai. ^QUi^g of steel samples with holes drilled trans(1996, 1997); rolljradius 300 mm ^ ^^^g^jy ^nd longitudinally. Examination of samno r/c V, Sc obser- ples, sectioned across the axis of the hole after m/s mm vation rolling, supplied information regarding the cor8.6 900 0.1 0.26 c+nw relation between the rolling parameters and the 1 8.6 1050 0.1 0.24 2 PC closing and welding of the holes. Eq. (5.116) 8.6 1200 0.1 0.22 c+pw was used as the flow stress model. Some of the 3 8.6 1200 0.4 0.25 c-fpw results for a reduction of 0.3 are given in Table 4 900 0.4 0.29 pc+pw 5.4, where h is the entry thickness, T is the tem5 20 6 20 1050 0.4 0.26 c+pw perature, Ec is the strain necessary to close the 7 20 1200 0.4 0.26 c+pw pore, and v is the roll velocity. The symbols c, w, p and n designate closed, welded, partly, welded and not welded pores, respectively. The experiments of Wang et al. (1996, 1997) involved various locations of pores, temperatures and thickness of the samples. Since the pores were closed during rolling, a comparison of theoretical and experimental results allowed only for the confirmation of the model's ability to predict the closure correctly. The model predicts closure for strains smaller than those used in the experiments. In Tests 2 and 5, partial closure of the void was observed, indicating that neglecting the influence of the gas pressure caused a slight underestimate of the strain necessary for closure. The available data did not allow the validation of the model with respect to changes of porosity during rolling are considered. The influence of the gas pressure on the behavior of the pores is demonstrated in Figure 5.21. The calculations were performed for various initial pressures. The pressure was changing during the process, following the changes of the volume of the pore and of the mass of the gas in the pore, calculated from Eq. (5.118) with c = 2 [MPa s]"^ Analysis of the resuhs in Figure 5.21 shows that the influence of the gas pressure at the primary stage of pore closure is negligible. The effect of this pressure becomes more important at the final stage of the closure, when the volume of the pore becomes small and causes an increase in the pressure. The observation of the results of the calculations shows that for larger pressures, complete closure of the pore is not possible. It should be emphasized, however, that the resuhs shown in Figure 5.21 depend strongly on the constant c in Eq. (5.118) which governs diffusion of gases. There are no reliable data regarding this phenomenon. Therefore, modeling of the closure of pores can be treated as a qualitative assessment of the problem, and thus allows comparative analysis only. Further analysis includes simulation of rolling after continuous casting. The initial state of the slab is described on the basis of the data published by Brimacombe and Samarasekera (1989). The porosity distribution through the thickness at entry to the roll gap has been assumed to vary between 7% and 3%. The current porosity influences on the thermal properties of the material are included in the computations. Figures 5.22 and 5.23 show the calcuhU THEMA nCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
149 lated distributions of the temperature, effective strain, average stress and porosity during rolling of an 80 mm thick continuously cast slab. The remaining process parameters are: entry temperature 1180°C, reduction 0.3, roll radius 350 mm, average strain rate 3.6 s'\ friction coefficient 0.25, and rotational velocity of 22 rpm. Analysis of the results shows that there is no significant difference between temperatures and strains calculated for solid and continuously cast material. Therefore, a possibility of the prediction of pore closure becomes the most important aspect of the simulation.
pressure:
—•—
0.
-#-
0.1 MPa
-•-
0.25 MPa
•
[
A
0.5 MPa
I \ I \ r 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 strain
Figure 5.21 Changes of the relative volume of a pore during rolling, calculated for various pressures in the pore
40 E E 20
effective strain Ij^ J.,4.„iJ,,A..j,:A; 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
X, mm
Figure 5.22 Calculated distributions of effective strain and average stress during rolling of an 80 mm thick iJj^imJilESr slab obtained from continuous casting (roll radius 300 mm, reduction 0.3)
80 100 120 140 160 180 X, mm
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN METAL FORMING
150
100 120 140 160 180 X, mm
Figure 5.23 Calculated distributions of temperature and relative density during rolling of 80 mm thick slab obtained from continuous casting (roll radius 300 mm, reduction 0.3)
100 120 140 160 180 X, mm Testing of the method based on the simulation of the behavior of a single void in a matrix, deformed under a local stress state, characteristic of rolling, leads to a few conclusions. The results qualitatively confirmed the predictive ability of the method. Quantitative agreement with the experimental data published by Wang (1996, 1997) was observed for the pore closure predictions only, when the gas pressure in the pore was accounted for. The simulation of changes of the pore volume during rolling was not validated. The method allows an investigation of the influence of rolling process parameters on its ability to eliminate porosity, resuhing from the continuous casting of steel.
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
151
Chapter 6 Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of the Final Product One of the objectives of the hot rolling process is to create steel with small, uniform ferrite grains. The properties required of the product are high strength, good ductility, good weldability and formability. The process of controlled rolling, in which the process parameters are chosen to suit a particular steel and a particular mill in order to attain those attributes, is the preferred technique followed to attain those attributes. The parameters available are the temperature, the strain and the strain rate per pass, the interstand and the pre-coiler cooling rates. The primary objective of the steel mill engineer is to design the draft schedule, referred to as the thermal-mechanical treatment. In doing so, the knowledge and understanding of the three critical temperatures are essential, as these affect the hardening and softening processes. These processes include precipitation hardening, recrystallization and recovery, each of which may be static or dynamic, depending on whether loads are applied. As well, work hardening, resuhing fi-om deformation below the recrystallization stop temperature, which causes pancaking of the grains, is to be considered. The critical temperatures, affecting hardening and softening, are: • • •
the precipitation start and stop temperature; the recrystallization start and stop temperature; and the transformation start and stop temperature.
All three temperatures are functions of the process and material parameters. Their importance in understanding the problems associated with the control of the steel's microstruture and structure are best examined by studying the iron-carbon phase equilibrium diagram, see for example Roberts (1983). The phase diagram shows the phases and their compositions as a fimction of the temperature and the alloy composition. The upper curve on the diagram represents the liquidus temperature, above which the alloy is in the liquid phase. The liquid begins to solidify when the temperature cools to the liquidus temperature. On solidification, the amorphous liquid phase changes into a crystalline solid, and grains nucleate and grow. This transformation does not happen instantly. On reaching the liquidus, nuclei form at several locations in the melt. The temperature remains constant while the nuclei grow. The solid phase just formed is called austenite, designated by y, and is a face-centered-cubic structure (FCC). Onftirthercooling to the ATS temperature, the first ferrite (a) grains appear and the steel reaches the two-phase region. The structure of the ferrite grains is body-centered-cubic (BCC). As the temperature drops again, the transformation stops and the steel becomes fiilly ferritic. This temperature is identified as the ATI. Depending on the carbon content and cooling rates, other phases such as pearlite or bainite may appear, as well. The two temperatures, Ars and Ari, are affected by the
152
chemical composition, pre-strain, cooling rate and initial austenite grain size. These effects are measurable, and for most purposes, the phase diagram gives sufficient information regarding transformation temperatures. Further, thermomechanical processing yields non-equilibrium microstructures, causing the modeling of these processes to be particularly difficuh. The objective of this chapter is a presentation and critical evaluation of models, describing the above mentioned phenomena, while paying particular attention to their compatibility with the thermomechanical approach to hot metal forming processes. The preceding chapters show that modeling of thermal and mechanical phenomena during rolling has improved significantly during recent years. Models of various complexities and various abilities have been developed, and accurate predictions of the metal flow and temperature fields in two- and three-dimensional domains do not present particular difficulties. Simultaneous with the development of thermal-mechanical models, the problem of the modeling of recrystallization and grain growth phenomena has also been of interest, and a number of models, based mainly on closed form equations, have been developed for various steels. Lack of information regarding strain and temperature distribution in the deformation zone, for more complex geometry of tooling, forced the assumption of uniform and isothermal deformation in the processes. Development of the finite-element technique and its applications to the simulation of metal forming processes provided a new perspective for the modeling of microstructure evolution, as shown in Figure 6.1. The information supplied by the finite-element models regarding the evolution of strain rates, strains, stresses and FINITE ELEMENT METHOD temperatures is useful input for the mod[fields of: eling of microstructural phenomena, field of strain rates| which take place in the deformation ttemperatureJ strains zone during hot rolling. The importance stresses of modeling of the evolution of the microstructure is discussed by Sellars (1990) and can be summarized: •
•
for a given composition of alloy, the high temperature flow stress is influenced to a large extent by the microstructure. Proper prediction of the rolling force is possible only if the relevant microstructure is known and the microstructure present at the end of the rolling and cooling operations controls the product properties.
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION
Figure 6.1 Usefulness of information supplied by finite-element models for a prediction of microstructure evolution during hot forming of steels
Industrial trials are expensive, difficult to control and monitor, and are necessarily constrained by the capabilities of existing plants. Laboratory simulation tests are unable to reproduce all conditions of industrial hot rolling. Taking only the most favorable test conditions of torsion and compression, there are limitations on attainable strain rates, particularly in relation to strip or rod rolling. These limitations are even more pronounced in torsion, which also develops different textures from those in flat rolling. On the other hand, the plane-strain and MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
153^ axisymmetrical compression tests cannot achieve the total strains of complete industrial rolling schedules. The advantages of using the finite-element method in the microstructure evolution modeling are twofold. First, is a possibility of investigation of local situations in the deformation zone, using conventional closed-form microstructure evolution equations. Solving these equations using temperatures, strain rates and strains, calculated by the finite-element method, allows the prediction of the distribution of the grain size, recrystallization kinetics and other microstructural phenomena in the volume of the deformed body. Variations of the temperature in time can be accounted for using the additivity rule. The second advantage is a possibility of using more advanced phenomenological models to examine the evolution of the microstructure, which are usually based on the internal variable method. Both of these possibilities are discussed in this chapter.
6.1
CONVENTIONAL MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION MODELS
The problem of the correlation between the parameters of hot deformation processes and the development of the resulting microstructure has been investigated extensively and a number of papers have been published in the scientific literature. Among them, the works of Sellars (1990), Roberts et al. (1983), Laasraoui and Jonas (1991a and 1991b), Choquet et al., (1990), Hodgson and Gibbs (1992), Yada (1989), Beynon and Sellars (1992), Sakai (1995), Kuzi^ (1997) and Devadas et al., (1991) should be mentioned. In these, various closed form equations are presented, describing the processes of recrystallization and grain growth. Some of these equations, concerning various chemistry of steels, are reported in this section and they are used together with the finite-element models for the predictions of microstructure evolution. The focus is on the description of the models. Readers interested in the experimental techniques may find the necessary information in the original publications. In general, one refers to all softening phenomena, which take place during the deformation, as dynamic processes. The softening phenomena, taking place after deformation is complete, are called static processes. The following nomenclature is used in this chapter: SRX is the static recrystallization, SRV is static recovery, DRX is dynamic recrystallization, DRV is dynamic recovery, MDRX is metadynamic recrystallization, and MDRV stands for metadynamic recovery. The balance between dislocation generation and the removal of dislocations determines the rate of the hardening of the austenite during deformation by dynamic recovery. Austenite does not undergo dynamic recovery to the same degree as do other metals. This ability to have extensive work hardening, without softening by recovery, may lead to dynamic recrystallization at higher strains. This kind of recrystallization is more probable at higher temperatures and at lower strain rates. In industrial hot deformation processes, however, often the strain rates are so high that there is not enough time to trigger dynamic softening of the work hardened material. Therefore, it is much more common for the material to be deformed only in the work hardening regime, that is, the strain per pass is not large enough (<0.4) to initiate dynamic recrystallization. Hence, concurrent static recovery, accompanied by static recrystallization, usually occurs after deformation. There is a high driving force for static softening to take place between rolling passes and during cooling after the final pass prior to transformation. Both static
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
154 recovery and recrystallization have been observed in austenite, although the extent of the former is rather limited. 6.1.1
Static changes of the microstnicture
Static recovery is defined as a softening process in which the decrease of density and the change in the distribution of the dislocations after hot deformation or during annealing are the operating mechanisms. In a low temperature range, the acting mechanism involves vacancy motion. Those operating in the intermediate temperature or in the high temperature range (>0.5r;„, where T^ is the melting temperature) involve dislocation climb and cross slip. As mentioned above, the extent of static recovery in hot rolling processes is rather limited. There is a general consensus that the maximum amount of softening during holding, attributable to recovery, is approximately 20%. The hot deformation of austenite at strains typically encountered in plate or strip rolling processes leads to significant work hardening, which is usually not removed by either dynamic softening processes or by static recovery. This hardening creates a high driving force for static softening processes. The mechanism of these processes is explained clearly by Hodgson (1993 a). Some of his observations are presented briefly below. Following static recovery, there is partial or complete softening of the microstnicture by static recrystallization, usually described as taking place in two stages: nucleation of new grains and the growth of these grains at the expense of deformed ones. Some features of static recrystallization are: • • • •
a minimum amount of deformation (critical strain) is necessary before static recrystallization can take place; the lower the degree of deformation, the higher the temperature required to initiate static recrystallization; the final grain size depends on the degree of deformation and to a lesser extent, on the annealing temperature; and the larger the original grain size, the slower the rate of recrystallization.
There is evidence that the nucleation of recrystallization occurs at the austenite grain boundaries by a bulge mechanism under deformation conditions, encountered in hot rolling. As with most grain surface nucleation, grain comers, edges and surfaces, in that order of preference, are the preferred sites for recrystallization. The bulge mechanism leads to a formation of critical size nuclei, which then grow by grain boundary migration due to a high driving force ahead of the growing point. This driving force is predominantly related to the dislocation density of the subgrain walls, the degree of misorientation across the subgrain boundaries and the size of the subgrains. At very large initial grain sizes (> 100 |im), there appears to be a change in the recrystallization mechanism, with the initial stage of recrystallization still occurring at the grain boundaries. At an early stage of transformation, however, the original grain boundaries are completely covered by new recrystallized grains, which have impinged upon one another, stopping fiirther growth. Further softening by recrystallization would require intragranular nucleation, which can occur at subgrain boundaries or deformation bands. At high temperatures (> 1200**C), only large grains are present and it takes only a fi-action of a second for the material to recrystallize completely. There is, therefore, little interest in the MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
][5^
kinetics of recrystallization under these conditions. This type of recrystallization may become important, however, at lower preheating temperatures or in hot direct rolling. During conventional preheating at high temperatures, incomplete recrystallization can take place at an early stage of the rolling process when small reductions are applied. The accumulation of strains then leads to full recrystallization in subsequent passes and, in consequence, the effect of the initial conditions on the downstream final microstructure is very small and is usually neglected. An exception is the thick plate rolling process, when the total reduction ratio can be as low as 3:1, and thus, insufficient to remove the reheated grain structure. Numerous experiments show that for grain sizes below 100 |im, recrystallization in carbon-manganese steels is very rapid above lOOO'^C. Slowing down recrystallization to the extent important from the practical point of view usually takes place below 950°C. The situation is different for microalloyed steels, in which recrystallization is retarded by the precipitates. The modeling of static recrystallization is an important part of rolling technology design. The most popular static recrystallization models are presented below. The models describing kinetics of static recrystallization are usually based on the JohnsonMehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov equation. The recrystallized volume fraction X in this equation is expressed as a function of the holding time after deformation:
X = \- exp
^ t
(6.1)
where: / is the holding time, tx is the time for a given volumefractionZ to recrystallize, A = \n{X), and k is the Avrami exponent. The majority of microstructure evolution models has been developed for X = 0.5, indicating that tx in Eq. (6.1) represents the time for 50% recrystallization and constant A = -0.639. Various empirical and semi-empirical equations, describing time for 50% recrystallization {h.sx) have been published. The most commonly used form of this equation is:
^..^Be'DTs'^xJ^^
(6.2)
where e is the strain, D is the grain size prior to deformation, Z is the Zener-HoUomon parameter, € is the strain rate, QRX is the apparent activation energy for recrystallization, R is the gas constant, and 7 is the absolute temperature. The constants B, p, q, r, s and QRX in Eq. (6.2) and Avrami exponent k in Eq. (6.1) in some commonly used models are given in Table 6.1. In the equation, developed by Choquet et al. (1990), the strain sensitivity of the time for 50 % recrystallization depends on the austenite grain size prior to deformation, according to the formulaic = -0.95D^'^^. The Japanese scientists (Suehiro et al., 1988, Yada, 1987) introduce a grain surface to grain volume ratio as an important parameter affecting the microstructural phenomena. This ratio is calculated as: S^ =—[0.491exp(f) + 0.155exp(-f)+0.1433exp(-3f)] MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
(6.3)
156 Table 6.1 Coefficients in equations (6.1) and (6.2) describing kinetics of staticJ recrystallization s r B source QRX, q P J/mole 300000 0 0 -4 2 Sellars (1990) 2.5x10-^^ 330000 0 Roberts et ah, (1983) 0 -4 2 5x10*^^ -0.28 270000 Choquet et al, (1990) 0 -0.14 6.1x10-^^ Pc 230000 Hodgson and Gibbs 0 0 -2.5 2 2.3x10'*^ (1992) Laasraoui and Jonas 0 -3.8 0 -0.41 252000 1.14x10"^^ (1991a) Suehiro et al., (1988) 0.286x10*'^^;;^^ 149650 -2 0 -0.2 0 Yada(1987) Nanbaetal., (1992) 1.12x10-^5',-^^ 0 0 -0.19 172850 -2.1 Kwon (1992) 3.32x10-^^ 285000 -3.14 1.4145 -0.12 0
k 1.7 1.7 1.7 1 1 2 2 2
The rate of recrystallization is only one important aspect when modeling the microstructural evolution, occurring during intervals between deformations and during cooling from the last pass to the transformation temperature. The ability to predict the recrystallized grain size is also necessary. Several authors have investigated the influence of strain rate, strain and temperature on the fully recrystallized grain size. General observations regarding this effect are given by Hodgson (1993 a) and they are repeated below. A power-law relationship between the recrystallized grain size and the applied strain was observed. To some extent, using a constant value of this power for different temperatures, is possible,. Furthermore, there appears to be no effect of the composition over the range of conventional carbon-manganese steels, confirming the lack of the effect of the composition on static recrystallization kinetics, observed earlier. There is also agreement with a study by Suehiro et al., (1988) where no effect of composition on the recrystallized grain size was observed for carbon contents varying from 0.1 to 0.8. Kuziak, (1997) observed no effect of carbon on recrystallized grain size for small initial grains only. However, for larger grains (> 100 ^m) he claims that there is a substantial influence of the carbon content on the size of recrystallized grains. Another feature concerning the prediction of the recrystallized grain size is its sensitivity to temperature, observed by a majority of authors. There are, however, models (Sellars, 1990) which do not incorporate a temperature term. The most commonly used form of the equation, describing the grain size after recrystallization {Dr) is: Z), =Cl+C2f'"5''Z)'exp•
RT
(6.4)
Not all components of Eq. (6.4) appear in all the models. The constants Ci, Ci, m, n and Qd, in Eq. (6.4), are presented, for some models developed for carbon-manganese steels, in Table 6.2. Several models contain equations with a structure different from that in equations (6.2) and (6.4). There are also models dealing with other than carbon-manganese steels. Some of these models, for the chemical compositions listed in Table 6.3, are given in Tables 6.4 and MATHEMAJJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
157 6.5. In Kuziak's equation (1997), the strain sensitivity of the time for 50% recrystallization depends on the austenite grain size prior to deformation, according to the formula p - 1.006£)^"^^. The compositions of steels given in Table 6.3 correspond to the materials, that were used in the experiments carried out to develop the models. Their appUcability is expected to extend to steels with chemical composition, similar to those used in the experiments.
Table 6.2 Coefficients in Eg. (6.4) describing the recrystallized grain size for carbon-manganese steels source n Ci C2 m J/mole Sellars (1990) 0 0.67 0 0 0.5 -1 Roberts et al. (1983) 0.5 35000 6.2 55.7 -0.65 0 Choquet et al (1990) -0.1 0.374 25000 0 45 -0.6 Hodgson and Gibbs (1992) 0.4 45000 0 343 -0.6 0
Table 6.3 Chemical steel C-Mnl C-Mn2 C-Mo Ti-V eutectoid VT lowNb high Mb
compositions of steels, models for which are giverI in this Chapter C Mn Si Al N Mo Nb Ti V 0.18 1.33 0.33 0.0003 0.003 0.003 0.16 1.04 0.36 0.001 0.004 0.003 0.06 1.2 0.22 0.18 0.029 0.0027 0.02 0.13 1.4 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.72 1.2 0.28 0.002 0.20 1.36 0.26 0.09 0.001 0.006 0.15 1.23 0.19 0.026 0.0024 0.024 0.002 0.07 1.33 0.33 0.035 0.006 0.084
Cu
Cr 0.012 0.09
0.08 -
0.21 0.012
0.032 0.022
Table 6.4 Equations describing time for 50% recrystallization for various steels equation source steel Roucoules et al, (1994)
C-Mo
Roberts et al. (1983)
Ti-V
Kuziak(1997) Kuziak et al, (1997)
eutectoid
Kuziak et al, (1997)
VT
W
=1-5x10-^2
^-0.28^-2.18^-0.878/232000^
W=5xlO-^^(£:-0.085)"''D' exp
^o.5j^ = 2 . 4 x 1 0
'280000^ .
RT >
-.^^-9^-exp[i^]
ro.3;,=9.3x lO-'^^-^P'exp
^230000^ .
RT J
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
158 Table 6.5 Equations describing the recrystallized grain size for various steels equation source steel Sellars and Whiteman (1979)
C-Mn
Yada(1987)
C-Mn
Nanba et al, (1992)
C-Mn
D,=34^y
Laasraoui and Jonas (1991)
C-Mn
D,=0.5D^^'e-^''
Roberts etal ,(1983)
Ti-V
Kuziak(1997) Kuziaketal, (1997)
eutectoid
-0.67
D =25 14.925 In-i^i-^
^
Kuziaketal.,(1997)
VT
Sellars (1980)
niobium
I
8.5 J z),=5Kr
\ D,=9.9lD'''s-'''l~''exp D,=4.54D'''e-'''l-'\xp
X
e
RT ]
^-17540^
,
RT J
'-15000 "j
D,=1.1D^^V^-^'
The models, described above, deal with the recrystallization behavior of carbon-manganese steels, including some with additions of molybdenum, vanadium and/or titanium. However, an important class of modem structural HSLA steels containing niobium has been designed to benefit from this element. The addition of niobium in steels causes retardation of recrystallization during the interpass period and during cooling after the final pass. Since it is the most potent element in retarding recrystallization on a weight percentage basis, niobium is added to steels in very small quantities, below 0.1 wt%. Strain induced precipitation is the operative mechanism when recrystallization is retarded to times, observed during holding at temperatures below 900°C. Retardation of recrystallization can be caused by either solute drag or strain induced precipitation (Sellars, 1980). There is still debate regarding the relative contribution of these two processes in industrial rolling. The difficulties with experimentally distinguishing the mechanism of retardation are discussed by Hodgson, (1993a). Further, numerical modeling of these processes is of importance. The models, proposed for static recrystallization of niobium steels in the absence of strain induced precipitation, are of the same character as those for carbon-manganese steels, except that the constants are different. The first model for niobium microalloyed steels, using a modified Avrami equation, was proposed by Sellars, (1980). The change in recrystallization kinetics, caused by strain induced precipitation due to the presence of niobium, was handled by taking the constant B and the activation energy QRX in Eq. (6.2) as functions of the temperature. However, the appearance of precipitation changes the character of recrystallization when compared to the solute drag effect only. Dutta and Sellars (1987) developed a model for strain induced precipitation which is the basis of several later models. In the Dutta and Sellars model, the change in recrystallization behavior is handled in a recursive manner. The amount of recrystallization during a time inMA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
159 crement is modeled using the solute drag equation, followed by a calculation of the time for precipitation to start, using the process conditions for the austenite at that time interval. The relative values of the time for 5% recrystallization r^osx ^ time for 5% precipitation tQ^^p, and time for 95% recrystallization to,qsx' control the material's behavior. It is assumed that for ^o.osx < ^o.osp < ^o.95;rrecrystalHzationis retarded by precipitation and for t^Q^^ > TQ^^^ recrystallization does not take place and there would be no further recrystallization once precipitation is predicted to occur. Figure 6.2 demonstrates the flow of calculations during modeling of the evolution of the microstructure in niobium microalloyed steels. RX in this figure stands for recrystallization and tp is the interpass time.
FULL RX
PARTIAL RX TOO SHORT INTERPASS TIME
NORX, STOPPED BY SOLUTE DRAG EFFECT
PARTIAL RX STOPPED BY I PRECIPITATION
NO RX. STOPPED BY SOLUTE DRAG EFFECT
NO RX, STOPPED BY PRECIPITATION
Figure 6.2 Flow chart of calculations of microstructure evolution in niobium steels
The relevant equations describing the kinetics of precipitation, as well as recrystallization in niobium steels, are given in Table 6.6. Notice that some of the equations describe the time for 5% recrystallization ^005;^, and some the time for 50% recrystallization /o.5x • ^"^ should remember that when foos;^ ^s used in the Avrami equation, Eq. (6.1), the constant A = 0.0513. In Table 6.6 [Nb] represents the niobium content in solution. In some cases, the models are valid for one steel composition only. The majority of them, however, introduce coefficients in the equations as a function of the niobium content. There are several more models for niobium steels (Choquet et al., 1990, Siwecki et al, 1995), in which not all material constants are given. These are not referred to in Table 6.6. MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
160
Table 6.6 Equations describing recrystallization and precipitation times for Nb microalloyed steels source recrystallization and precipitation times Dutta and Sellars .^^ ,^-20^^2 -4 300000 'I21i^^x^^ [Nb] (1987) W x =6.75x10 '°Z)'f ^ ' ^ P ^ ^ ^ exp 270000
^o.osp = 3 X 10-^[Nb]-'f-^Z-^-^ exp
RT
exp
2.5»10'^
[Nb]f[c]-.1^[N] where the supersaturation ratio is:
k^2.26
10 Hodgson (1993a) Hodgson (1993b)
'„,. = (- 5.24 + 550[Nb])x lO-'P^^-^^^t^" e x p [ ^ ^ ]
O.OSp
Laasraoui and Jonas(1991b)
'
:6xlO~^[Nbr£-'Z""'exp
270000
2.5.10*'
RT
U'On^J'j
-exp
for 0.05%Nb ,,.=1.27xl0-.-r-expf^^^^ \ RT ) 9 QA V in-19 .-3.8 .-o.42_r4360001 for 0.055%Nb, 0.003%B 5J^ = 2.86 X10 s s exp RT -24^-3 55^-0.33_/559000V 05, =1.06xl0-'^f-'-''f-'''exp _" |for 0.058%Nb, 0.003%B
RT J
Kwon(1992)
0.03. = 6 . 7 5 x 1 0 - / ) ^ . - e x p f ^ l e x p l
^275000
I- RT
-185 [Nb]
^1.534x10' _ 206300^[Nb][c] exp
RT
r
]
r
The models developed for microalloyed steels allow the prediction of the rolling temperature at which precipitates stop the recrystallization. Evaluation of the no-recrystallization temperature is presented by Bai et al, (1993). The no-recrystallization temperature, in **C, may be calculated from (Boratto et al., 1988): T^UBX = 887+464[C]+(6445I>fbh644^/[Nb])+ H-(732[V]-23(V[V])-f890[Ti]+363[Al]-357[Si
(6.5)
where the content of elements is in weight %. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
161^ Situations when partial recrystallization takes place during interpass times are common in the industrial rolling processes. A majority of researchers use a simple weighted average Dp = XDr + (1 - Z)) to calculate the grain size at the entry to the next pass; in the relation D represents the grain size prior to deformation, Dp is the recrystallized grain size and X is the recrystallized volume fraction. Beynon and Sellars, (1992), claim that the following equation gives better results: Dp=D,X^"^UD{\-Xy
(6.6)
All considerations presented above are limited to carbon-manganese, eutectoid and microalloyed steels. Information is harder to find for other metals and alloys, probably because of the complexity of their behavior during thermomechanical processing. Significant limitations in the equations, describing the effects of the principal process variables and prior grain size on recrystallization kinetics during hot rolling of aluminum alloys, are caused by the influence of solutes, second phase particles and precipitates, which is more complex than that for steels. The particles may influence recrystallization by pinning boundaries and by acting as preferential nucleation sites. Sellars et al., (1985), reports that the kinetics of recrystaUization differed significantly in two samples of an Al-lMg alloy, of similar compositions, but slightly different distribution of second phase particles. Chen at al., (1992) discuss the main principles of modeling the microstructure evolution during hot rolling of aluminum. The microstructure evolution equations for some aluminum alloys are presented by Sellars et al., (1985, 1990). 6.1.2
Dynamic softening
All softening processes that take place during plastic deformation are referred to as dynamic ones. These include dynamic recovery and dynamic recrystallization. Dynamic recovery involves the rearrangement of dislocations and consists of two processes. Dislocations of opposite signs annihilate each other or rearrange to form cells of relatively low dislocation density, surrounded by boundaries of high dislocation density. At high temperatures, the mechanisms responsible for dynamic recovery are the cross slip of screw dislocations or the climb of the edge dislocations (Kocks, 1976). Since in the conventional approach dynamic recovery has only an indirect influence on modeling the microstructure evolution by controlling the onset of dynamic recrystallization, it will not be discussed fiirther. More information about modeling dynamic recovery is found in section 6.4, which treats the internal variable method. In metals of high stacking fault energy, dynamic recovery takes place rapidly and a steady state of stress is reached. This is the result of the balance between work hardening and recovery (Figure 3.3). The steady state is characterized by a subgrain size, which in general depends on the Zener-Hollomon parameter, Z. Deformation of materials with medium or low stacking fault energy is characterized by slow dynamic recovery. Thus, usually dislocation density is permitted to increase to an appreciable level, causing the onset of dynamic recrystallization before the steady state is reached, as shown in Figure 3.4. Dynamic recrystallization is a well researched phenomenon. Although the major features have been delineated, there still remains a number of unresolved matters (McQueen, 1993). A survey of research on hot deformation of steels shows that there is agreement that, generally, softening is caused by dynamic recrystallization, and that plastic instabilities become less likely or frequent as the MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
162 temperature increases and/or the strain rate diminishes. Contrary observations for other materials have been reported. Wierzbinski and Korbel (1993) observed that, in the sequence of structural changes during hot deformation of Cu-lONi alloy, the shear bands play the most important role in mechanical performance while dynamic recrystallization is a secondary phenomenon. When modeling thermomechanical processing of steels, assuming that when the dislocation density reaches its critical value, dynamic recrystallization starts and becomes the dominant softening phenomenon, is valid. This critical value of the density corresponds to the critical strain, Sc. For a given stacking fauh energy, the critical strain is a function of the temperature, the strain rate and the austenite grain size. The characteristics of microstructure evolution during and after dynamic recrystallization is connected to the mechanism of recrystallization, as discussed by Roucoules, (1992). Nucleation of dynamic recrystallization is said to begin at a critical strainfib,which corresponds to a critical dislocation density. Once the critical density, which depends on strain rate, temperature and steel chemical composition, is reached, dynamic recrystallization is initiated by the bulging of preexisting grain boundaries at low strain rates. At higher strain rates, dynamic recrystallization is initiated by the growth of the high angle cell boundaries, formed by dislocation accumulation. The driving force for the grov^h of the nuclei is the difference in dislocation density in front of and behind the boundary. The mechanism of nucleation differs for single peak and multiple peak behavior. In the single peak case (grain refinement), nucleation essentially occurs along existing grain boundaries and is referred to as the necklace structure. The growth of each grain is stopped by the concurrent deformation. When all the grain boundary sites are exhausted, further new grains are nucleated within the original grains at the interface of the recrystallized and unrecrystallized grains. In the multiple peak case, the growth of each new grain is terminated by boundary impingement and not by the concurrent deformation. In industrial hot rolling processes, the strain rate is relatively high, such that only single peak dynamic recrystallization is likely to occur, if any. In a given material, the characteristics of dynamic recrystallization may be assumed to depend on only three parameters: the initial grain size A the temperature 7, and the strain rate e. The initial grain size affeas the critical strain ec, the peak strain Sp, and the kinetics of dynamic recrystallization. The finer the initial grain size, the lower the critical and peak strains. This is because dislocations accumulate more rapidly and the higher specific grain boundary area per unit volume, leads to faster recrystallization kinetics. Peak stress is also found to be dependent on the initial grain size, while the steady state stress andfinalgrain size are independent of it. Sakai (1995) presents a different theory regarding dynamic recrystallization processes. One of the contributions of this theory is a criterion distinguishing between the multiple and single peak behavior. Sakai states that if the peak strain Sp is greater than the strain necessary for the completion of flow softening GS, which takes place at low Z, dynamic recrystalization is cyclic. Conversly, at high Z when the peak strain Sp is lower than Ss, dynamic recrystallization is continuous in all areas of the material. Sakai (1995) also claims that multiple peak deformation is observed for finer grains prior to deformation A and a single peak is displayed by the coarse grain material. Since the stable, dynamically recrystallized grain size A , for a given temperature is independent of D, this suggests that tiie multiple peak or a single peak behavior can be controlled by the ratio A ID rather than by Z. When Ds>2D grain refinement and single peak flow take place. When A < 2D, multiple peak flow appears during grain coarsening. When dynamic recrystallization starts during deformation, after deformation other processes, leading to a decrease of dislocation density, take place. These processes include MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
163^ metadynamic recrystallization, static recrystallization, metadynamic recovery, and static recovery. Metadynamic processes, researched by Roucoules, (1992), Roucoules et al, (1994), Roucoules and Hodgson, (1995), Sakai, (1995) and Kuziak et a!., (1997), are presented briefly in Section 6.3, where the main equations for these processes are given. The conventional models of dynamic recrystallization involve equations describing the critical strain, kinetics of dynamic recrystallization and the grain size after dynamic recrystallization. Numerous models have been developed for various materials and some of them are presented below. The equation describing the critical strain for dynamic recrystallization is: s, = AZ^D^
(6.7)
Coefficients^,/? and q and activation energy QDRX in the Zener-Hollomon parameter for various materials are given in Table 6.7.
Table 6.7 Coefficients in Eq. (6.7) describing the critical strain for the dynamic recrystallization source A material QDRX ^ P J/mole 312000 Sellars (1980) 0.5 0.15 C-Mn steel 4.9x10"* 66500 Yada(1987) C-Mn steel 4.76x10"* 312000 Laasraoui and Jonas (1991a) 0.13 C-Mn steel 6.82x10"* 312000 0.18 Kuziak et al. (1997) 0.15 VT 4.4x10"^ 315000 0.3 Kuziak et al. (1997) 0.18 eutectoid 4.3x10-^
Kinetics of dynamic recrystallization is often described using strain as an independent variable instead of time. The equation describing dynamically recrystallized volume fraction is: X^DRX • 1 - expB\ s-s.
(6.8)
K 'P J
where Sp is the strain at the peak stress, usually calculated as Sp = Csc. The coefficients in Eq. (6.8) for various materials are given in Table 6.8. Yada, (1987) and Anan et al., (1992), describe the kinetics of dynamic recrystallization by:
^D/yr = l - e x p • 0.693 V **o.5jr J
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
(6.9)
164 Table 6.8 Coefficients in Eg. (6.8) describing kinetics of dynamic material source C-Mn steel Hodgson (1993a) VT Kuziaketal., (1997) Kuziak et al, (1997) eutectoid
recrystallization B k 1.4 -0.8 1.5 -0.4 1.3 -1.7
C 1.23 1.12 1.05
The strain for 50% recrystallization is calculated as: s,,^
= 1.144 X lO-'D'^'s'"'
(6.10)
expf ^' ^ ^ ° ^
Experiments show that the fully dynamically recrystallized grain size is insensitive to the strain and grain size prior to deformation, but that it depends on a joint effect of the temperature and the strain rate, expressed by the Zener-HoUomon parameter. The general equation describing the grain size after dynamic recrystallization is: Dn
(6.11)
••BZ'
Coefficients in Eq. (6.11) for various steel compositions are presented in Table 6.9. Table 6.9 Coefficients in Eq. (6.11) describing the dynamically recrystallized grain size r B source material Sellars (1980) Yada (1987) Hodgson and Gibbs (1992) Kuziak et al. (1997) Kuziak et al. (1997)
6.1.3
C-Mn steel C-Mn steel C-Mn steel VT eutectoid
1.8x10^ 2.26x10^ 1.6x10^ 1.4x10^ 1.6x10^
-0.15 -0.27 -0.23 -0.16 -0.2
QDRX
J/mole 312000 267100 312000 312000 315000
Metadynamic Recrystallization
Once the dynamic recrystallization is initiated during the deformation, the dynamically recrystallized nuclei continue to grow even after the deformation is interrupted. This mechanism is identified as metadynamic recrystallization. Three distinct softening processes take place after dynamic recrystallization, described as static recovery, metadynamic recrystallization and static recrystallization (Roucoules, 1992). While the dynamic recrystallization nuclei grow by metadynamic recrystallization, the rest of the material undergoes static recovery and static recrystallization. Unlike static recrystallization, metadynamic recrystallization apparently does not require an incubation time, because it makes use of the nuclei formed by dyMATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
16^ namic recrystallization. As a consequence, dynamically recrystallized microstructures are subject to rapid changes after unloading and this may resuh in a coarser grain size. One of the most common interpretations of restoration after dynamic recrystallization as a distinct process is proposed by Hodgson, (1993a). The fact that static recrystallization laws do not apply once the strain exceeds the critical value was observed earlier by Sellars, (1979). He noticed that for strains above the critical strain, the time for 50% recrystallization becomes independent of the strain, leading to much lower rates of recrystallization than predicted by the static recrystallization models. The kinetics of microstructure restoration processes after the dynamic recrystallization, measured by Hodgson, (1993 a), is strongly dependent on strain rate. In contrast, during static recrystallization, the transformation kinetics depends strongly on strain and temperature and not so strongly on strain rate. At the early stage of static recrystallization the grain size decreases, irrespective of whether thefinalfiiUyrecrystallized grains arefineror coarser that the original ones. Quite a different behavior is observed for post dynamic recrystallization. The fiilly recrystallized grains are always coarser than those observed right after dynamic recrystallization at the point of unloading. There is no tendency for the microstructure to be refined during post dynamic softening. Rather, there is a continual increase in the average grain size with the recrystallizedfi-action.Observations (Hodgson, 1993a) show that increasing strain rate and decreasing temperature refine the metadynamic grain size. Similar effect on the dynamically recrystallized grains is also observed. Sakai (1995) presents another view of the mechanism of metadynamic recrystallization, outlined here briefly. Sakai (1995) observes two stages of softening in the material, deformed below the critical strain. The first involves static recovery and the second, static recrystallization. Softening following dynamic recrystallization consists of three stages: i) almost instantaneous initial softening leading to a plateau, ii) substantial softening with an Avrami slope of 0.36 leading to a second plateau, and iii) gradual softening leading to a third plateau and to X of about 0.7. Such unique softening behavior of the DRX matrices is caused by the heterogeneous nature of the dynamic substructure. When the hot deformation ceases, the DRX nuclei continue to grow, leading to metadynamic recrystallization. Classical nucleation is not possible in these grains, and they soften only by metadynamic recovery in their interiors. Finally, the fully work hardened and dynamically recrystallized grains undergo static recovery and static recrystallization. Sakai (1995) writes that although the four mechanisms (MDRX, MDRV, SRX and SRV) can operate concurrently, their effect in the DRX matrix can be distinguished. His investigation shows that static recovery has the largest contribution to the softening of the DRX matrix. The first stage of softening involving MDRX leads to a softening plateau at Jr= 0.2. Substantial softening takes place in the second step associated with the classical SRX. All observations form the bases for the metadynamic recrystallization models, which are quite different than the static recrystallization ones. The contradictory theories of Hodgson (1993 a) and Sakai (1995), pertaining to the relative contribution of different mechanisms in the post dynamic softening processes, have to be considered in modeling. The softening curve for the metadynamic recrystallization can be adequately described by the Avrami equation with the Avrami constant of approximately 1.5, higher than reported by Hodgson and Gibbs, (1992) and slightly lower than reported by others (Sellars, 1990; Yada, 1987, Choquet et al., 1990; Roberts et al, 1983) for static recrystallization.
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
166 The general form of the equation describing the time for 50% metadynamic recrystallization is: ^0.5 = A^' expl
(6.12) RT
The constants in Eq. (6.12) for carbon-manganese steels are given in Table 6.10, with Qd being the activation energy of deformation in the Zener-Hollomon parameter. Table 6.10 Coefficients in Eq. (6.12) describing time for 50% metadynamic recrystallization for various steels s source steel Ai Q J/mole J/mole 300000 312000 -0.6 Sellars (1979) C-Mn 1.06x10-^ 230000 -0.8 300000 Hodgson (1993) C-Mn 1.12
Most researchers have not considered models for post dynamic recrystallization and the resulting grain size. Metadynamic grain size depends on the Zener-Hollomon parameter and is larger than that after dynamic recrystallization. The general equation describing the metadynamic grain size is: (6.13)
D^=AZ" The constants in Eq. (6.13) for various steels are given in Table 6.11.
Table 6.11 Coefficients in Eq.(6.13) describing the grain size after metadynamic recrystallization for various steels source u A steel J/mole 312000 Sellars (1979) -0.11 C-Mn 1.06x10^ Hodgson (1993) -0.23 312000 C-Mn 2.6x10^ Kuziaketal. (1997) -0.16 315000 VT 2.3x10^ Kuziaketal. (1997) -0.23 312000 eutectoid 2.5x10^
Changes of the grain size during metadynamic recrystallization are usually calculated as the weighted average of the contributing grains: D{t)=I)DRxH^MD-^DRX%
MD
(6.14)
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
^
167
In Eq. (6.14), XMD is the volume fraction after metadynamic recrystallization, calculated from the Avrami equation with k = 1.5. More detailed analysis of metadynamic recrystallization shows that it grain growth, different from normal growth, following static recrystallization. Senuma and Yada (1986) propose one of the more advanced models:
^ ( 0 = ^D/?;.+l.l(^A/D-^Di^)^l -exp
-295^«Wr^^^
(6.15)
In all equations above the grain growth model is used to calculate the average grain size D{t) starting from the completion of the dynamic recrystallization until the critical post dynamic grain size DMD is reached. From here, normal grain growth equations should be used. 6.1.4
Grain Growth
Following complete static or metadynamic recrystallization, the equiaxed austenite microstructure coarsens by grain growth. Since there is a lack of models dealing with an abnormal grain growth, the assumption of uniform growth is made. The models for uniform growth are, in general, based on the isothermal law:
^W"=^^+Vexp RT
(6.16)
where DRX is the fully recrystallized grain size, / is the time after complete recrystallization, Qg is the apparent activation energy for grain growth, and n and kg are constants. Table 6.12 contains these, obtained by Nanba et al., (1992) and by Hodgson and Gibbs, (1992) for various materials. A slightly different approach to the grain growth problem is proposed by Roberts et al, (1983), observing that a characteristic feature of grain growth after recrystallization is an abrupt decrease in the growth rate, some time after the completion of recrystallization. A parabolic type equation with two sets of parameters for two stages of growth is used to characterize this behaviour in a qualitative manner:
H)
D{tf =Z)^+/xlo"
(6.17)
The values of constants a and b for various steels are given in Table 6.13. The first stage of grain growth is assumed to last approximately 20 s. Table 6.12 Coefficients in Eq. (6.16) describing the grain growth source steel Nanba et al., (1992) C-Mn Hodgson and Gibbs (1992) C-Mn-V Hodgson and Gibbs (1992) C-Mn-Ti Hodgson and Gibbs (1992) C-Mn-Nb
n 2 7 10 4.5
% 4.27x10^^ 1.45x10^"^ 2.6x10^^ 4.1x10^^
Qz, J/mole 66600 400000 437000 435000
MCROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
168 Table 6.13 Constants a and h in grain growth Eq. (6.17) for various steels source steel stage 1 a b Roberts et al. (1983) C-Mn 6.6 6200 Kuziaketal. (1997) VT 7.1 7180 Kuziak et al. (1997) eutectoid 7.0 5900
stage 2 a 8.1 9.5 8.4
b 9000 10920 8520
Fast development of the finite-element method in the 80s allowed taking advantage of the possibility of accurate evaluation of the distributions of the temperatures, strain rates and strains in the deformation zone. This, in turn, lead to the connection of the finite-element programs with the conventional microstructural equations (Figure 6.1), described by Pietrzyk, (1990). Solutions have been proposed by Zouhar and Hofgen, (1988), Beynon and Sellars (1992) and Buchmayr et al, (1993) who used finite difference techniques and Korhonen et al., (1991), Karhausen and Kopp, (1992), Glowacki et al., (1992), Grossteriinden et al, (1994) and Kuziak et al., (1997), who used the finite-element method. Both approaches allow the evaluation of the distribution of the grain size in the volume of the product after hot forming. The validation of the predictions of the models is, of course, essential While the models perform reasonably well under laboratory conditions, their application to industrial forming processes often presents difficuhies. Substantiation of various conventional microstructural equations connected with the finiteelement model, using laboratory plastometric tests, with axially symmetrical samples, and laboratory and industrial rolling tests, is presented in the next section.
6.2
PROPERTIES AT ROOM TEMPERATURES
The objective of modem processes is to produce high strength products. Modeling the correlation between thermomechanical history and the mechanical properties of the final product, especially after experimental substantiation of the predictions, would be very usefiil during the development process. Computer simulations of the thermomechanical processing of hot rolled steels are reasonably advanced, as presented in Section 6.1. However, progress in the prediction of transformed microstructures, and in the attempts to predict the resuking mechanical properties, taking into account the transformation, is still quite limited. Existing models, describing the influence of thermomechanical history on the mechanical properties and their distribution in the final product, are discussed in this section. 6.2.1
Ferrite grain size
As the steel continues to cool after hot deformation, it transforms fi-om austenite to lower temperature phases. In the predominantly ferritic microstructures (steels with carbon equivalent Ceq = (C + Mn)/6 < 0.45), transformation to ferrite and pearlite takes place. Here the main parameter of interest is the ferrite grain size, as the pearlite and interlamellar spacing do not contribute significantly to the strength of these compositions. Ferrite grains have been shown to nucleate at austenite grain boundaries, at deformation bands, at second phase partiMA THEMA TJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPER TIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
169 cles, and at recovered subgrain boundaries, especially if decorated by precipitates. The factors that affect the ferrite grain size are the final austenite grain size and the retained strain, both of which relate to the deformation history, the composition and cooling rate, which are external influences. The final austenite grain size is the last fully recrystallized grain size, increased by growth between the last pass and the beginning of the transformation. The retained strain applies to that strain not removed by recrystallization prior to transformation. The strain may accumulate over a number of passes, in which case the retained strain is the total accumulated strain after the last pass of full recrystallization. Various relationships for the ferrite grain sizes have been suggested in the literature. Some of them are presented in Table 6.14 where Da is the ferrite grain size in jim, G is the cooling rate in K/s, D is the austenite grain size, also in |im, 8r is the accumulated strain, ^ i s the ferrite fraction, and Ti.os/ is the temperature at which transformation begins. 6.2.2
Lower yield stress
The mechanical properties are represented by the yield strength, indicating the beginning of plastic deformation or the end of pure elastic behavior of the loaded material. The lower yield stress and yield strength definitions are taken to be identical. One of the most successful approaches to the prediction of mechanical properties in products made of plain carbon steels was developed by Gladman et al, (1972), relating the yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and impact transition temperature to the microstructural parameters of the ferrite-pearlite microstructure. When trying to rationalize the results obtained by Kuziak et al., (1997) and Majta et al, (1995, 1996b), the equations of Gladman and co-workers were unsatisfactory for predicting the yield and ultimate tensile strengths for a variety of steels. More detailed studies of this problem, based on published information is presented below. According to the Hall-Petch equation, the lower yield stress Oy for a homogeneous microstructure is expressed as: ory=<7o+KyD^^
(6.18)
where OQ is the lattice fi-iction stress, Ky is the grain boundary unlocking term for high angle grain boundaries, taken as 15.1 -18.1 Nmm"^^^, and Da is the ferrite grain size. In microalloyed steels the yield strength is a combination of the strengthening contributions connected with the thermomechanical history of the deformed material. Employing all possible strengthening contributions, ao in Eq. (6.18) is given by (Majta et al., 1995):
(6.19)
where <Jo is the inherent friction stress, equal to 32 MPa for pure ferrite and 70 MPa for low carbon steel, ass is the solid solution strengthening, C7p is the dispersion strengthening (precipitation hardening), <jd is the dislocation strengthening, due to forest dislocations, Gsg is the unaccounted for strengthening mainly due to subgrain strengthening, and o? is the texture strengthening.
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
170 Table 6.14 Equations describing the ferrite grain size steel equation source Sellars and C-Mn Z)„=(l-0.45^;'')x Beynon ^.4 + 5C,'^^^-f>22[l-exp(-L5xlO-^£))] (1984) C-Mn Hodgson and Ceq<0.35 Gibbs(1992) C-Mn Hodgson and Ceq > 0.35 Gibbs (1992) ^ C-Mn Suehiro et al., (1988) C-Mn
Nb
V-Ti V-Ti
V-T
Donnay et al. (1996) Sellars and Beynon (1984) Roberts et al. (1983) Sellars and Beynon (1984) Kuziak et al. (1997)
f- 0.4 + 6.37C«,)+ (24.2 - 59C^)C;°' + 22[l ~ exp(- 0.015£))] D = ( l - 0 45f *^^)x . \ 0/ r / M^ |^22.6-57C,J+3C;°'+22[l-exp(-0.015D)]j D = 5.51xlO*°Z)^'^Sxp
-21430 \
To. .05/
;
Z)„ = {l3 - 0.73^000 ([C] + 0.\\Mnf jJD^'C Z)„=(l-0.45^;'')x {2.5+ 3C,"^^^+2o[l-exp (-1.5x10-^/))]} D^=3.75 + 0.18Z) + 1.4C;®^ D^=(l-0.45^;'')x ^ + 1.4C,"^'^4-17[l-exp (-1.5x10-^1))]} D ^ "^ 1 +(0.036 +0.0233 C ° ^ ) D
The superposition law based on the Hall-Petch relationship is applicable when the glide resistance is relatively low over most of the volume of the material, and is quite high over thin sections, such as grain boundaries. When the contribution of the dislocation density is higher it is convenient to separate the strengthening components due to interactions between forest dislocations and mobile dislocations, and collect all other contributions into the second major strengthening component, to which it is necessary to add the grain size stress. When experimental resuhs are fitted by the root of the sum of the squares summation (r.s.s.), the agreement between the measured and calculated yield stress is much better than with a linear summation. This improvement is especially noticeable when the dislocation density is high, when rolling is finished at low temperatures. Using the r.s.s. summation, the yield stress is expressed as a sum of two parts (Kocks et al., 1975): matrix strengthening (oo*, (J„, Op) together with grain boundary strengthening (cTsg,ag) and dislocation strengthening (cTd): tf^l + ^ « +^p +CT^g + a , + 0 - ^ ' +C7/J
(6.20)
MATHEMA7JCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
171 where:
This model is restricted to steels, in which the volume fraction of pearlite does not contribute significantly to the strength, when pearlite content is less than 30%. When the yield strength of the second phase is known, the total strengthening is obtained by the weighted average rule: c7y={l-Xyay,-^X"cTy^
(6.21)
where X is the volume fraction of the second microstructural constituent (pearlite, bainite, etc.), and ay, cFyi and
(6.22)
where k is solid solution strengthening coefficient for the /th solute, C/ is the concentration of the 7th solute (wt.%), and n is the number of solutes. Numerous semi-empirical equations describing the lower yield stress of carbon-manganese and microalloyed steels have been developed on the basis of the principles discussed above. Some of the commonly used equations for the carbon-manganese steels are presented in Table 6.15 where Da is the ferrite grain size in jam, Xf is the ferrite fraction, G is the cooling rate in K/s, and So is the pearlite interlamellar spacing. The symbols of the elements refer to the content of these elements in the steel. Some of the equations in Table 6.15 account for an influence of pearlite on mechanical properties of steels. This influence is represented by two parameters, volume fraction of ferrite XfdXid interlamellar spacing of pearlite So, calculated from (Kuziak et al, 1997): Xj.=X}-
5.476[l - exp(- 0.0106CJ]- 0.723[l - exp(- 8.8 x 10"^ Z))]
(6.23)
Z ; = 1 ~ [C](0.789 - 0.1671[M«]+ 0A607[Mnf - 0.0448[/l/«f )"'
(6.24)
^0 =0.1307 + 1.027[c]-1.993[cf -0.1108[M«]+0.0305C,"^"
(6.25)
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
172 Table 6.15 Equations describing lower yield stress for carbon-manganese steels source equation Gladman ^^ = 63[Si] + 425[Nf' + ^^^^^^
X'J' (35 + 58[Mn] -H7(0.001Z)„ ^ )-f (l - X'J' )(l79 + 3 . 9 ^ ^ )
Gladman (1975)
a^ =88 + 37[Mn] + 83[Si]+2900[Nf' + 1 7 ( O . 0 0 1 D J " ' '
Le Bon and Saint Martin (1974)
cr^ = 190 + 15.9(0.001Z)^)"^^
Baker7l993)
^y " WQ + 37[Mn]+83[Si]+1500[N]+18.6(o.001Z)^)'°^y +q-j
Choquet et al. (1990)
a^ = 63 + 23[Mn]+ 53[Si]+ 5000[N]+700[p]+ .
Xf[i5A - 30[c]+^|;5^J(o.ooii),r^+(1 - jr^)(360+260o[cr) Hodgson and Gibbs(1992)
a^ = 62.6 + 26.l[Mnl+60.2[Si]+759[p]+212.9[Cu]+3286[N] r ^-o5 +19.7(0.00 ID^)^^
Majta et al.,
a^ = 75.4[Si]+478[N]+1200[p]+ X^(77.7 + 59.5[Mn] + 9.l(0.001i)J-^^)4-(l-A^^)(l45.5 4 - 3 . 5 V ' )
Kuziaketal, (1997)
^ = j ^ (77 7 ^ 59.5[Mn]+ 9.l(0.001i)„ r ' ) + >' /V \ ^ \ 478 N f + 1200[P]+ (1 - J^/A1^5.5 + 3.5 V ]
In Eq. (6.24) Xf- is the equilibrium content of the ferrite. The mean true interlamellar spacing is the most important parameter affecting the strength properties of the pearlite microstructure. Traditionally, a Hall-Petch type equation is used to characterize the effect of this parameter on the lower yield stress and ultimate tensile strength. However, as shown by Kuziak et al, (1997) for eutectoid steels containing 0.6-0.8%C, the approach suggested by Dollar et al., (1988) correlating the mechanical properties to ^o instead of S^'^ gives better resuhs. In this approach, the mean free path for slip M in the pearlitic ferrite is used instead of the mean true interlamellar spacing to characterize the strength. These conclusions were reached in experiments which included measurements of the properties of rails and bars after hot rolling. Different strengths were produced by varying the chemical composition and the cooling rate of the experimental samples. The best correlation was obtained with two sets of constants, for small and large values of the mean free path for slip in the ferrite. These resuhs can be associated with the different deformation mechanisms in fine and coarse pearlites (Dollar et al., 1988). The equations relating the lower yield stress to the mean free path for slip in the ferrite are: MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
173
J_ a^ =308 + 0.07— M
for
SQ>0.\S\im (6.26)
<j^ =259 + 0.087-^
for
5'o<0.15fjLW
where A/= 2^o(l-0.15[c]). On the basis of published data, Majta et al., (1995, 1996b), developed a complex model which combines thefinite-elementthermal-mechanical approach with the equations describing microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of steels during and after hot forming. This model was validated using carbon-manganese and niobium steels. Some more details regarding the equations in Table 6.15, as well as the basis for the equations used in the present model are given below. When the deformation is completed in the austenite region the dislocation density in the ferrite structure is relatively low. When the deformation is extended to the austenite-ferrite or the ferrite region, the dislocation strengthening becomes much more significant. The dislocation contribution to strengthening is very complex, and usually is an effect of the interactions among forest dislocations, mobile dislocations and the substructure. When finish rolling is in the ferrite region, it is difficult to distinguish between the contributions due to precipitation and dislocation hardening. The dislocation contribution to strengthening at a specific temperature is well described by the equation: a,=aGbp'"'
(6.27)
where G is the shear modulus for pure iron, equal to 8.1x10"^ MPa, b is the Burgers vector for ferrite, 0.248 nm, p is the forest dislocation density, and a is a constant, depending on the interaction between dislocations at the considered temperature, varying from 0.38 to 1.33 (in the current model a = 0.76). Since dislocation density measurements are tedious and often inaccurate, the dislocation contribution to strength is usually assessed on the basis of the difference between observed and calculated values. Existing formulae for calculating the dislocation density, which involves changes in the yield strength, are usually valid below the temperature range of dynamic recovery. In the present model the correlation between dislocation density and deformation temperature is expressed as:
for TFT> >Ar3
P = Pc
(6.28)
and
}=
p^Bexp{£-\i
A_
for TFD
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
(6.29)
174 where pbisthe dislocation density of the annealed steel, 4x10^ cm•^ f is the amount of deformation below >4/-3, and B, A, and u are material constants. Majta et al., (1995) suggested .4 = 1030,5 =1.8 and M = 8.8. The subgrain contribution to the yield strength is important as well. The extent of strengthening derived from the subgrains depends on their size and the volume fraction of ferrite grains with subgrains, both of which depend on the finish rolling temperature. Usually the mechanism of substructural strengthening is presented in a form similar to the Hall-Petch equation for high angle grain boundaries: ^sg=ksr
(6.30)
where m is an exponent, usually varying from -1 to -0.5, and ks is a constant, associated with subgrain boundary strength: k ^ = l ^ = 2A^ ' 2;r(l-v)
(6.31) ^ ^
In Eq. (6.31), 0 is the subgrain boundary misorientation, / is the subgrain boundary average intercept distance, and vis Poisson's ratio. Computations using Eq. (6.31) indicate that small variations in the value of 0 (v^athin the range 1° - 5^ have a large effect on k^. Furthermore, estimates of the fraction of grains containing subgrains can lead to significant errors because of the experimental problems associated with sampling and the determination of the subgrain boundary misorientation. In the present model, the average value of subgrain contribution to strengthening is used, based on experimental resuhs (Baker, 1979). When the last deformation is below Ar3, the subgrain strengthening component will increase the yield strength by approximately: -sP\^-\\
(6.32)
where s is the strain, defined as in Eq. (6.29), and P is a constant which depends mostly on the ferrite grain size. For a steel containing 0.076% Nb and having grains of d = 5-13 [im, the constants are given as P = 300 MPa, w = 0.3. In microalloyed steels, accounting for the influence of precipitates on an increase of mechanical properties is essential. The precipitation contribution in strengthening can be expressed by the modified Ashby-Orowan equation: 1/2 Gp=
'-
{
In
^
Ih
(6.33)
\ where/is the volume fraction of NbC, VC and VN particles when complete precipitation occurs, and X is the mean planar intercept diameter of the precipitates. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
175 Eq. (6.33) is difficult to manipulate because of the need to estimate the size of the particles. In most practical metal forming processes involving microalloyed steels, the effect of precipitation can be described by using the dispersion strengthening contribution coefficient K of the alloying elements. In that case the precipitation strengthening is obtained in the form: (J
= Z^/[M,]
(6.34)
where Kt are constants in the range of 1500 and 3000 MPa/wt.%, and [M] designates the Nb, V, Ti contents in vA%. Beyond the general principles outlined above, some particular features of the precipitation hardening phenomenon are pointed out. The contribution of the vanadium carbonitride precipitates to the overall strengthening effect may be assumed to depend linearly on the nitrogen and vanadium contents and logarithmically on the cooling rate. The dependence of the strengthening effect on the cooling rate is known to reach a maximum within a cooling-rate range of 5 to 10°C/s, depending on the steel composition and the processing route. However, since the cooling rate of air-cooled products is typically less than 5°C/s, a logarithmic representation of the cooling-rate effect on the strength properties is justified for all rolling processes considered in this study. The precipitation of niobium nitrides and carbides can be significantly modified, because of the complex Ti-Nb nitrides or carbonitrides formed as a result of small titanium additions to niobium steels. The reduction of the yield strength in these steels is due to the formation of coarse complex Ti-Nb nitrides and carbides which remove the niobium and reduce the dispersion hardening by fine niobium carbide particles, depending on the Ti/N ratio and process route. Accounting for the features of the precipitation hardening equations, describing the contribution of precipitation to the yield stress, have been suggested by researchers. Some of these equations are presented in Table 6.16 where [Nb]* is the niobium content available in the solution at the transformation temperature Ary Assuming that 0.01% Ti additions, on average, reduce the yield strength in C-Mn-Nb steels by at least 12.5 MPa, Majta et al., (1995) suggested the precipitation contribution in strengthening, modifying that by Kejian and Baker (1993) in Table 6.16.
Table 6.16 Equations describing the contribution of precipitation to the lower yield stress steel source equation V Hodgson and Up = 57logC, + 700[V]+ 7 8 0 0 [ N ] + 19 Gibbs(1992) Nb Hodgson and Gp = 2500[Nbr Gibbs (1992) V Kuziak et al. o-^ =19.9[c] + 552.8[cf +590[v]-f8650[N]+19.91n(C,) (1997) Nb-Ti Kejian and (j^ = 1500[Nb]* Baker (1993) Nb-Ti Majta et al. o-^=2500([Nb]*-0.5[Ti]) (1995) MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
176 The model, for precipitation-induced increases in the yield strength and in the ultimate tensile strength, developed by Hodgson and Gibbs, (1992) is adequate for practical observations. Although not found in this model, the contribution of carbon to precipitationstrengthening should be included in the analysis of the effect of vanadium carbonitride on strength properties (Kuziak et al, 1997). The effect of carbon content on the transformation temperature justifies its inclusion. Most vanadium precipitation occurs during ferrite transformation (interphase precipitation) and in the ferrite after transformation. Increasing the carbon content should lead to a decrease of the mean particle size of vanadium carbonitride by depressing the precipitation start temperature. Consequently, precipitation-strengthening components should be increased as the carbon content increases. A correlation analysis, which was performed for the model's development, is based on the results of Kuziak et al., (1997) and on the data of Sawada et al, (1994) and Burnet, (1986). The increase in yield strength and ultimate tensile strength, originating from the vanadium carbonitride precipitates was estimated by subtracting the structure-related values of these parameters (calculated from the equations of Kuziak et al., (1997), listed in Table 6.16) from the measured values of yield strength and ultimate tensile strength. Large, complex deformations usually involve the creation of a pronounced crystallographic texture. This could arise in two ways: inheritance from the austenite phase or deformation of the ferrite. However, texture studies show that above 600'*C there is no development of a preferential texture, which could significantly increase the strength. Thus, an increase of the strength due to texture usually does not exceed 10% of o^ and, therefore, at will not be analyzed separately. In the current model, possible eventual contribution of texture in strengthening is included in the value of cxsg . Using the relationships described above in the finite-element model of the process, it is possible to predict the yield strength distribution in the final product as a result of different thermomechanical histories. 6.2.3
Tensile strength
Selected equations describing the tensile strength are presented in Table 6.17 where Da is the ferrite grain size in |im, A/is the ferrite fraction, Cr is the cooling rate in K/s, and So is the pearlite interlamellar spacing). Kuziak et al., (1997) investigated the uhimate tensile strength for the eutectoid steels, containing about 0.6-0.8%C. They suggest that, similar to the lower yield stress, the tensile strength for these steels should be correlated to SQ^ rather than to S^'^. In consequence, the following equations describing the tensile strength as a fimction of the free path for slip in the ferrite are obtained: C7„ =706 + 0 . 0 7 2 - ^ + 122[Si]
for
^o >0.15pL/w
M
(6.35) a„ =773 + 0 . 0 5 8 - ^ + 122[Si]
for
SQ <0.15pL/w
M
where M= 25'o(l-0.15[c]) MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
177 So = ^29.3 - 54.4[Mn]- 4.4[Cr]- 17.5[S/]- (0.18 - 0.07[Mn]- 0.012[Cr]- 0.027[Si])r^ }''
Table 6.17 Equations describing tensile strength for carbon-manganese steels source equation Gladmanetal. o-„ =Zy'(246 + 1143[Nf' +18.l(0.001Z)J"°')-f 97[Si]H (1972) {^-X^/^\719 + 3.5S^-^) Choquet et al, o-„ = 237 + 29[Mn]+ 79[Si]+ 5369[N]+700[P]4Hodgson and Gibbs(1992)
7.24X^(0.00 LD„ y-^ + 500(l - Xf) o-„ = 164.9+ 634.7[c]+53.6[Mn]+99.7[Si]+651.9[p]+ . i r i / v-0 5 472.6[N?]4- 3339.[N]+1 l(0.001D^r ^
Kuziaketal, (1997)
C7„ =Z^(20 4-2440[Nf' +18.5(0.001Z)J-'')+
6.3
750(l - Xf )+ 3(1 - X^/ )S^' -f 92.5[Si]
SUBSTANTIATION OF THERMAL-MECHANICAL-MICROSTRUCTURAL MODELS
The microstructure evolution models described in the previous section are semi-empirical in their nature. Therefore, the results obtained from various models can often vary significantly, making the choice of the most suitable approach difficult. A number of experiments have been carried out to substantiate the models and selected results of this substantiation are presented in this section. In all considered cases the microstructure evolution equations were implemented into the thermal-mechanical finite element programs. 6.3.1
Carbon-manganese steels
Experimental validation of the thermal-mechanical-microstructural models under industrial conditions is expensive, therefore, researchers usually used torsion (eg. Hodgson, 1993a, 1993b; Samuel et al., 1990) or compression (e.g. Kopp, 1988; Majta et al., 1995) tests as a substitution for rolling. Kedzierski et al., (1996) made an attempt of using two kinds of processes, namely, axisymmetric hot compression and hot strip drawing, as physical models of rolling processes. The objective of the experiment was to investigate the evolution of the microstructure in various hot forming conditions and to validate the microstructure evolution models, described above. The experimental setting for the drawing-rolling test includes the furnace, three roller dies and a quenching device (Figure 6.3). The rollers are placed in a special cage with five sections, enabling changing the distance between them. The roll diameter is 60 mm, the roll width is 20 mm and the maximum roll gap is 5.5 mm. During the experiment, the samples are heated in the furnace to the test temperature and then pulled through the roller dies and quenched. The MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
178 initial thickness of the samples was between 5,5 and 5.8 mm. The thermal conditions and the straining in the drawing process are similar to those in the continuous rolling.
Figure 6.3 Experimental setting; 1. Furnace, 2. Sample 3. Cage, 4. Roller dies, 5. Insulator, 6. Quenching device
Finite element analysis has shown that the distributions of temperatures, strain rates and strains in the rolling and drawing processes are identical. The only difference between these processes is connected with the state of stress. As shown in Figure 6.4, the drawing process involves more tensile stresses compared to rolling. However, since the influence of the stress state on the microstructure evolution is not accounted for in the models, the differences between the stresses in drawing and rolling are neglected here, as well. Thus, drawing through the set of roller dies is considered a good representative of the industrial strip rolling process.
Figure 6.4 Distribution of the average stress in the deformation zone in the processes of hot rolling and drawing of strips MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
m Various combinations of reductions and inteq)ass times were used in the investigation. Two carbon-manganese steels, with the chemical compositions given in Table 6.3 (designated as C-Mnl and C-Mn2), were tested in the experiments with the strains being similar in both compression and drawing processes. The time-temperature profiles were different. Various heating procedures prior to the deformation were employed leading to different initial grain sizes. Finer but slightly nonuniform grains were observed for steel C-Mnl, making the analysis less reliable. More uniform, coarser grains were obtained after preheating steel C-Mn2. The evaluation of the time-temperature profile is essential for the accuracy of the predictions of microstructure evolution. In the present tests, temperatures were determined by the finite-element model described in Chapter 5. Some of the drawing experiments were performed with the thermocouples inserted in the sample and the monitored temperatures compared well with the calculated ones (Kedzierski et al., 1996). The heat transfer coefficient at the roll/workpiece interface used in the calculations was 20 kW/m^K, as suggested by Pietrzyk et al, (1994). A typical air-cooling model, accounting for convection and radiation, (Lenard and Pietrzyk, 1990), was used during the interpass times. The results of the measurements of the grain size in the multistage compression process are compared with the calculations in Tables 6.18 and 6.19, where Q indicates quenching. Strain rates of about 2 s'^ were used in all tests. Five equations describing the grain size after the static recrystallization were used. These equations are presented in Tables 6.2 and 6.5 and the following symbols are used for distinguishing the references: SW indicates Sellars and Whiteman (1979), RR stand Roberts et al. (1983), CH for Choquet et al. (1990), YY for Yada (1987), and HG for Hodgson and Gibbs (1992). M in the tables stands for the measurements.
Table 6.18 Measured and calculated austenite grain size (|Lim) in the compression test (steel C-Mnl in Table 6.3, M stands for measurements) No source M schedule RR CH YY SW 1 20.3 lOOOOC-Q 2 llOOOC-Q 39.2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1000OC-24%-2.3s-Q 1100OC.24%-2.3s-Q 1000OC-24%-l.7s-Q 1100OC-24%-1.7s-Q lOOOOC - 24% - Is -16% - l.7s - Q 1100OC-24%-ls-16%-1.7s- Q lOOQOC - 24% - l.7s -16% - 1.7s -Q llOOOC - 24% -1.7s -16% - 1.7s -Q 1 lOQOC - 24% - Is - 16% - Is -16% -1.7s-Q
17.4
15.7
26.3
28.9
26.9 15.5
41.5 26.1
26.7
41.3
21.0 35.0
18.7 30.5
22.2 34.0 30.5
18.8 30.6 29.6
34.4 51.3 34.5 51.4 54.4
19.9 37.3
25.8 40.0
20.5 30.4
25.6 38.8
20.3 30.2 25.3
33.3 46.4 33.3 46.5 46.3
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
32.1 25.4 32.3 32.3
180 Table 6.19 Measured and calculated austenite grain size (^lm) in the compression test (steel C-Mn2 in Table 6.3, M stands for measurements) source M No schedule SW RR CH HG YY 1 lOOOOC-Q 24.2 2 llOOOC-Q 32.0 3 1000OC-24%-2.3s-Q 22.7 17.1 28.0 27.4 31.8 18.8 4 1100OC.24%-2.3s-Q 27.0 24.5 38.0 36.1 48.4 26.9 5 1000OC-24%-1.7s-Q 20.6 17.5 27.9 27.3 31.7 18.7 6 1100OC-24%-1.7s-Q 23.8 24.2 37.8 35.9 48.3 26.6 7 1000OC-24%-1.0s-16%-1.7s-Q 23.3 19.5 35.4 34.1 42.1 19.8 8 1100OC-24%-1.0s-16%-1.7s-Q 22.6 29.1 45.9 41.9 67.8 30.2 9 1000OC-24%-1.7s-16%-1.7s-Q 21.2 19.6 35.4 34.1 42.3 18.7 10 IIOOOC.24%-1.7s-16%-1.7s-Q 21.8 29.2 49.6 45.1 67.8 30.3 11 1100OC-19%-0.9s-20%-0.9s-21%-1.9s-Q 190 18.7 36.9 33.7 44.6 19.4 12 1100OC-20%-0.4s-19%-0.4s-20%-1.3s-Q 20.2 29.0 53.7 46.0 75.1 31.7 The grain size equations were incorporated into thefinite-elementmodel for the compression test, accounting for the inhomogeneity of deformation. The local strains in the center of the sample, where the microstructure was measured, exceed the homogeneous strain, observed in Figure 6.5, where the distributions of the effective strain at the cross section of the sample, during a 3-stage compression (Test #12 in Table 6.19), are presented. The strain inhomogeneity in the sample leads to a nonuniform distribution of the grain size, shown in Figure 6.6. The results in this figure are based on the equation developed by Sellars and Whiteman, (1979), see Table 6.5. Strain inhomogeneity leads to the prediction of finer grains in the center of the sample, compared with those of Kedzierski et al., (1995), obtained using the assumption of uniform deformation. In the present calculations coarser grains are observed in the area located below the die in the center of the sample. Small strains (Figure 6.5) have been predicted in this area. A comparison of the measured and calculated grain size, obtained in continuous drawing through the roller dies, is given in Tables 6.20 and 6.21. Measurements and calculations at several locations on the cross section have been performed and are shown in the center of the strip. Slightly finer grains are observed closer to the surface. Figure 6.7a shows a comparison of the measured and calculated austenite grain sizes during 3-pass drawing of steel C-Mnl, the samples of which were heated to an initial temperature of 1100°C (Test #11 in Table 6.20). Similar results, obtained for the steel C-Mn2 samples heated to the initial temperatures of llOO^C and lOOO^C (Tests #14 and #13 in Table 6.21), are presented in Figures 6.7b and 6.8. These figures show some discrepancies among the values of the grain sizes, calculated using different models. The kinetic recrystallization model predicts partial recrystallization in the last pass of tests #13 and #15. In the experiment, elongated grains are observed after these tests. In these situations, the grain size is evaluated using the grain dimensions in two perpendicular directions. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
181
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
r, mm
Figure 6.5 Calculated distribution of the effective strain during 3-stage compression (test 12 in Table 6.19)
Table 6.20 Measured and calculated austenite grain size (|im) in the continuous drawing test (steel CMnl in Table 6.3, M stands for measurements) No
schedule
source
M SW
RR
CH
HG
-
-
-
20.5 38.0 19.7 36.6 26.2 26.4 40.8 39.9
16.6 29.8 15.8 28.6 20.0
15.6 30.8 14.9 30.0 20.2 20.7 31.9 32.8
1
lOOQOC-Q
11.5
2
IIGGOC-Q 1000OC-24%-2.3s-Q 1100OC-24%-2.3s-Q 1000OC-24%-1.7s-Q 1100OC-24%-1.7s-Q lOOOOC - 24% - 0.3s -16% - 1.7s •Q lOOOOC - 24% - 0.6s -16% - 1.7s •Q • 1 lOOOC - 24% - 0.6s -16% - 1.7s•Q 1 lOOOC - 24% - 0.7s -16% - 0.6s - 16%-1.7S-Q
41.9
-
12.4 32.6 11.8 35.7 10.9 12.5 23.7 25.5
12.2 22.8 11.2 21.5 13.1 13.4 21.4 20.0
3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
20.2 29.9 28.3
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
182
0.0
0.5
10
1.5
2.0
25
r, mm
Figure 6.6 Calculated distribution of the austenite grain size at the cross section of the sample during 3-stage compression (Test 12 in Table 6.19)
The microstructures at the center of the sample for all the experiments in Table 6.21 using the initial temperature of 1 lOOT are shown in Figure 6.9. The numbers in the figure refer to the test numbers in Table 6.21. Beyond test 15 and possibly 16, full recrystallization is observed. The microstructure in test 16 reveals some not folly recrystallized grains. The results presented in Tables 6.18-6.21 and in Figures 6.5-6.9 show significant discrepancies among various microstructure evolution models for carbon-manganese steels. Since the equations describing microstructural phenomena are semi-empirical in their nature, and were obtained for various chemical compositions of steels, conclusions regarding the accuracy of the models should not be drawn directly from these results. However, the resuhs of Glowacki et al., (1992), Pietrzyk et al, (1993c) and by Kedzierski et al., (1995, 1996), as well as the data presented in this chapter, lead to the conclusion that the Sellars and Whiteman, (1979) grain size model gives results, closest to the measurements obtained under different conditions for carbon-manganese steels C-Mnl and C-Mn2. The equation of Choquet et al., (1990) also gives reasonably good resuhs when the predictions are compared to experimental data for a majority of tests.
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
183 Table 6.21 Measured and calculated austenite grain size (|im) in the continuous drawing test (steel CMn2, M stands for measurements). Italics are used for elongated grains, calculated as a geometrical average from two perpendicular dimensions No
schedule
SW
RR
CH
HG
YY
90.0
-
-
-
-
-
24.6
19.4
28.9
25.0
31.9
23.7
76.9
59.2
17.0
1 2
lOOOOC-Q UOOOC-Q
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1000OC-18%-2.3s-Q 1100OC-18%-1.4s-Q 1000OC-19%-2.7s-Q 1100OC-18%-2.5s-Q lOOOOC -18% - 0.85s - 17% - 1.5s - Q 1 lOOOC -17% - 0.8s - 20% - 2.0s - Q lOOOOC -19% - 0.5s -19% - 1.5s - Q 1 lOOOC -18% - 2.3s - 18% - 1.8s - Q lOOO^C -19% - 3.5s - 20% - 1.9s - Q
12 13 14 15 16
1 lOO^C -19% - 0.4s -19% - 1.7s - Q lOOOOC -19% - 0.9s -19% - 0.9s - 18% - 3.4s - Q 1 lOO^C - 19% - 0.9s - 20% - 0.9s - 21% - 1.9s - Q lOOO^C - 19% - 0.5s -19% - 0.5s - 22% - 1.3s - Q 1 lOOOC - 20% - 0.4s -19% - 0.4s - 20% - 1.3s -Q
a)
40.7
39.6
65.7
50.4
24.8 43.0
18.3 42.9 17.7
27.7 69.2 31.7
24.0 53.2 25.3
30.0 81.3 34.8
23.2 61.5 27.4
26.9 15.7 27.3 16.0 29.4 15.2 19.5 12.3 21.1
55.3 29.7 56.4 22.9 52.6 29.3 40.8 27.2 43.4
39.2 23.6 39.2 28.6 37.5 22.7 28.9 20.4 30.4
68.0 32.8 65.1 30.4 64.9 31.9 49.5 29.3 53.7
47.4 24.9 50.1 26.3 45.0 27.2 35.9 23.9 36.6
17.1 33.2 13.2 29.5 20.9 25.8 15.0 19.6 14.0 19.0
b) AR —1
110-n
40-
10090-
35 -
£
source
M
__.
G—
#
//
80-
30-
E
#
•^
3. oi" .ti!
/
(0
c
- - 0 - • measurement
[--•• • •
measurement
j—^nLJ -
Sellars & Whiteman, i y / y
7060-
I
Roberts et al., 1983
A -
Choquetetal., 1990
\J -
Yada, 1987
504030-
10 -1
-
510 00
-^^
20-
101 1020
1 1040
1 1060
temperature. °C
1 1080
11 00
1000
1 1020
1 1040
1 1060
1 1080
11 00
temperature. °C
Figure 6.7 Measured and calculated grain size during 3-pass drawing through the roller dies, steel C-Mnl (a) and C-Mn2; (b) initial temperature 1100°C MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
184 All the remaining formulae yield grain sizes, that exceed those measured for higher starting temperatures (llOO^C) when coarse 25 grains prior to deformation (90 jum) are observed in the experiment. The accuracy of E 20 H those formulae is much higher for the finer initial grains (Figure 6.7a) and for the lower 15H starting temperature (Figure 6.8). The accuasurement racy of the models of the kinetics of recrys10 Sellars & Whiteman, 1979 tallization affects directly the calculations of { -B- Roberts etal., 1983 the recrystallized grain size. Analysis of the Choquet et al., 1990 micrographs shows that for the starting temYada. 1987 perature of 1100°C the recrystallization was 1 I ~n not complete in the surface layer in test 16 920 900 940 960 980 1000 temperature. ^C in Table 6.21 (see Figure 6.9). Partial recrystallization was also observed in the Figure 6.8 Measured and calculated grain size whole volume of all samples, deformed in 3 during 3-pass drawing through the roller dies, passes at a starting temperature of 1000**C. steel C-Mn2; initial temperature 1000°C The equation describing the time for 50% recrystallization given by Roberts et al., (1983), did not predict partial recrystallization in the tests mentioned above. On the other hand, the equation developed by Sellars, (1990), and presented in Table 6.1, yields longer times for 50% recrystallization. In consequence, it properly predicted partial recrystallization in the whole volume of the samples after 3-pass drawing at the starting temperature of 1000°C and in the surface layer of the sample after test 16 in Table 6.21. Note that the current grain size is the major parameter affecting the kinetics of the recrystallization. Thus, the accuracy of the predictions of both the grain size and the recrystallization time is mutually dependent and the models should not be validated separately. Therefore, in order to enable the comparison of the grain size models independently of the predictions of the kinetics of recrystallization, the measured grain size was used in the calculations of the time for 50% recrystallization. 30 H
6.3.2
« pancaked grains
Niobium microalloyed steels
In the following section the full model is used to describe the microstructure evolution during hot rolling of a Nb microalloyed steel (Pietrzyk et al, 1995a). The model has been compared with laboratory data which have the advantage of representing the true rolling conditions. This also allows accurate measurements of the temperature, load and the microstructure, both during rolling and after cooling to room temperature. The complete model involves a combination of the finite-element approach, described in Chapter 5, and a microstructure model, which predicts the evolution of the austenite microstructure to calculate the thermal and mechanical aspects of rolling. The predictions of loads during rolling depend on the choice of the stress-strain relationship used in the calculations. The constitutive equation for the current model is based on the work by Hodgson and Collinson (1990), who suggested the hyperbolic sine equation, Eq. (3.24), with the coefficients K = MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
185 100 , p - 0.2, A = 2x10 and m - 0.2. This function was obtained direcdy from torsion tests. In the original work, the constants given above were for the mean yield strength, rather than for the stress at a given strain, strain rate and temperature. However, Pietrzyk et al., (1995a) has noted that there is no significant difference, for the particular steel studied and the range of deformation conditions used, between the plane strain mean yield strength at a given strain and the equivalent tensile stress.
Figure 6.9 Micrographs at the center of the sample after hot drawing of carbon-manganese steel sample according to the schedules in Table 6.21, initial temperature 1100°C
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
186 Two microstructure evolution models, suggested by Hodgson, (1993a, 1993b) and by Dutta and Sellars, (1987), both presented in Table 6.4, were used in the finite-element program for the analysis of the recrystallization and precipitation kinetics. When full recrystallization occurs, the recrystallized grain size is calculated. When partial recrystallization occurs, a simplified approach assuming a simple weighted average is used to determine the grain size and the retained strain is calculated as: €,=A£{\~X)
(6.36)
where X is the recrystallized volume fraction, £ is the strain in a pass, and A is a, coefficient between 0.5 and 1 (Hodgson and Gibbs, 1992). The possibility of grain growth after complete recrystallization is included in this analysis, using Eq. (6.16). Since the steel used in the experiment contained some niobium, the coefficients for C-Mn-Nb steel in Table 6.12 are employed. The presence of Ti was expected to require some alteration to the grain growth equation. However, the multiple reheats used during the initial rolling of the slab to plate and then rolling as described in this work, appear to have eliminated this need. The microstructural equations by Dutta and Sellars, (1987) and by Hodgson, (1993a), given in Table 6.6, were incorporated into the finite-element program, and calculations of the recrystallization kinetics and grain sizes were performed at different locations through the strip thickness. Local values of the temperatures, strain rates and strains were used in the microstructural equations. The additivity rule was introduced to account for the temperature variations during the time intervals. Both precipitation and recrystallization processes were simulated according to the following principle: ^ = ± ^
(6.37)
where n is the number of time increments, and /, is the time, calculated from the relevant equation for the current temperature and the time increment At.. A low Nb HSLA steel, with the composition given in Table 6.3, was used. The samples were reheated for 30 minutes at 1250°C in a small furnace in stainless steel envelopes to reduce scale formation. The samples were then rolled at a rolling speed of 0.36m/s according to four rolling schedules. The temperature was measured using two N-type thermocouples inserted in the mid-thickness and mid-length of the samples. Roll forces were recorded during the tests. Tests Tl, T2 and T3 were based on an approximation of a plate rolling schedule, involving continuous cooling with a constant interpass time of 10s and a constant strain for each pass. Such an approach has been termed a no-recrystallization temperature (TNRX) test. The remaining tests, T4 and T5, were based on an approximation of a hot strip mill schedule, with separate roughing and finishing phases. The strains and interpass times were not those encountered in actual strip rolling, but were designed to test the conditions of a large number of passes with strain accumulation. The details of each test were: •
Tl consisted of 10 passes, each of 0.15 true strain, separated by a 10s interpass time; MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
187 • • •
•
T2 consisted of 8 passes, each of 0.25 true strain, separated by a 10s interpass time; T3 consisted of 6 passes, each of 0.35 true strain, separated by a 10s interpass time; T4 consisted of 3 roughing passes, each of 0.25 true strain and given at fixed temperature; then 5 finishing passes, each of 0.25 true strain and separated by a 6s interpass time, started at two entry finishing temperatures; and T5 consisted of the same schedule as in T3, however the amount of true strain given during the finishing was decreased to 0.15.
The temperatures at which the tests were started, the entry finishing temperature (tests T4 and T5 only) and the finishing temperatures as well as the number of passes for each test are given in Table 6.22. Typical time-temperature history for one case of each test is presented in Figure 6.10. Samples were either quenched after a certain number of passes or air cooled to determine the prior austenite and ferrite structure, respectively. The longitudinal section corresponding to the position of the thermocouples was examined. The average grain size was estimated by the linear intercept method at the center of the strip and at the surface.
Table 6.22 Start and end temperatures for the tests Tl, T2, T3, T4 and T5 test Tl T2 T3 start 1. 1187 (10) 1. 1189(6) 1. 1190 (6) temperature, °C 2. 1190(6) 2. 1188(8) 2. 1042 (6) 3. 1168 (10) 3. 1185(3) (number 4. 1208 (10) 4. 1193(5) of passes) 5. 1163(8) 6. 1209 (8) 7. 1169(8) entry finishing temperature, *^C end finishing 1. 825 temperature, **C 2. 1002 3. 819 4. 845
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
823 804 1097 1015 793 835 803
1. 845 2. 796
T4 T5 1. 1169(3/5) 1. 1169(3/5) 2. 1171(3/5) 3. 1177(3/5)
1. 2. 3. 1. 2. 3.
937 920 921 803 773 785
1. 922
1. 836
The temperature drop measured during the five schedules was compared to the FEM calculation. The heat transfer coefficient at the roU-workpiece interface was chosen as 20 kW/m^K on the basis of the information, presented in Chapter 2. Since the samples were protected fi'om scaling during the heating, the maximum value of the heat transfer coefficient reported by Pietrzyk et al, (1994) has been chosen. The calculated history of the temperature agreed closely with the measurements (Figure 6.10), confirming again the predictive ability of the model. With the exception of test 3-1, in MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
188
^
which the large strains caused breaking of the thermocouple after the 5 pass, the measurements and calculations agree quite well during the whole process.
1300 n 0
1200
2
1100 H
test 2-1 (strains 0.25) +
measurement prediction
1 1000 test 1-4 (strains 0.15) I 900 H -4- measurement S
800 prediction
700 20
40
—i r100 60 80 time, s
700 120
nuenched after 6th pass 1 1
20
40
* \
60 80 time, s
\
100
\—
120
test 3-1 (strains 0.35) -f-
measurement prediction
Figure 6.10 Selected measured and calculated time-temperature profiles for each test time, s
Due to air cooling of the surface and the chilling effect of the contact between the plate and the rolls, the calculated temperature at the surface was 80 to 140°C less than the center temperature. The temperature of the strip, averagedfi-omthe surface to the center to represent the gradient through the plate, was slightly less than the calculated central temperature. At this stage of the calculations, the resuhs obtained from the finite-element method were compared with those fi'om the one-dimensional model (slab method) described in Chapter 4. In both calculations, it was assumed that full recrystallization was taking place after each pass. An example of the comparison between these two methods and the measured rolling loads, presented by Pietrzyk et al., (1995a), shows that while the FE calculation gave slightly higher values than the slab method, the differences are negligible.
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
189 Typical results of measurements and calculations of the roll force for the tests 800 n, T2-6 in Table 6.22 are presented in Figure measurements test 2-6 6.11. Both models give a good prediction calculations, 1D model of the rolling loads from the 1^ pass to the II-A" calculations, FEM 6005**" pass. The spread of rolling data during a given pass is quite large, in particular for the 4* and subsequent passes, and this is due to the impact between the rolled plate £ 400 -Jf and the rolls, which becomes more profull recry$te(lizat]on nounced as the steel hardens. The compariassumed son between measurements and predictions 200 was, therefore, based on the loads measured after the transient caused by the impact. When full recrystallization was assumed, the experimental roll forces in the last three 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 passes increased at a much higher rate than time, s the model's predictions, presumably due to the strain accumulation from one pass to Figure 6.11 Roll forces measured and calcuanother. Good agreement was obtained lated by the FEM and the ID model for T2-6 when the kinetics of recrystallization was accounted for. A more convenient way of representing this data, and supplying more information regarding the contribution of the microstruaure, is to consider the ratio of the measured loads to those calculated by the FEM, assuming complete recrystallization. This ratio is presented for each schedule as a function of the temperature (Figures 6.12a-6.16a). At high temperatures, the ratio remained within 5% of the measurements for each schedule. For lower temperatures, a deviation from the prediction was observed. The experimental rolling loads were up to 30% higher than the predictions. The temperatures at which the deviations were observed, were 1010°C, 960°C and 940°C for the tests Tl, T2 and T3, respectively. Application of heavy roughing reductions and long interpass times led to the decrease of this temperature to about 940OC for the tests T4 and T5.
nHfi -t
For the tests T2 and T4, above 1000°C, the predicted mean hot strength was in closer agreement with the experiments than for Tl, which involved a lower reduction per pass. As the temperature decreased, the experimental mean hot strength deviated to higher values than the model's predictions. Below 1000°C, the solute drag effect and the precipitation of NbC take place and inhibit or completely stop the recrystallization process. As a result, strain accumulation took place and the hot strength increased. Therefore, all the calculations were repeated with microstructure evolution model introduced into the finite-element code. Two recrystallization and precipitation kinetics models, developed by Dutta and Sellars, (1987) and by Hodgson, (1993a), presented in Table 6.6, were tested, as shown by Pietrzyk et al, (1995a). Only the results for the latter model are presented in Figures 6.11 and 6.12b-6.16b. This approach accounts for the influence of the strain accumulation on the rolling loads. An example of the comparison of loads predicted by the one-dimensional model and the fiMICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
190 nite-element method for test T2-6 is shown in Figure 6.11. Loads calculated, accounting for the strain accumulation, are plotted using thick lines. Some influence of the strain accumulation on the predictions of rolling forces is observed in Figures 6.12b-6.16b, where the measured to calculated load ratio is plotted as a function of the temperature for all the tests. Accounting for the evolution of the microstructure caused significant improvement in the agreement between measurements and calculations at low temperatures. a)
b)
1.3
[ •
^^ 1.2
•
^
1.1
1.25-1
1 11870C
•
2
1190«C
• I•
3
11680C
4
1208«C
rw
test1 1.20- strains 0.15
1.15-
m
3-1168«»C 4 -1208OC
1.10-
• •
1.05-
•
•
•
1.00-J • 1^-5 •
testi Istrains 0.15 0.9 1 800 900
2-1190OC
•
u.
1.0-+
1 -11870C
A
v-i::--
0.95-
. • •
0.900.851 \— 1000 1100 temperature, oc
1200
A
• *
•
• 1
1
800
900
1
1
1000 1100 temperature, ^C
1 1 20
Figure 6.12 Measured (Fm) to calculated (Fc) rolling load ratio for the test Tl; (a) foil recrystallization assumed, (b) kinetics of recrystallization accounted for using Hodgson's model These results lead to some conclusions regarding microstructure evolution models for niobium steels. Dutta and Sellars' (1987) model tends to predict faster recrystallization kinetics than does Hodgson's (1993a) model. The former model predicts lower loads as the temperature decreases, especially for large reductions. It also predicts the appearance of retained strains at lower temperatures than observed in the experiments (Figure 6.17), while failing to predict partial recrystallization observed metallographically after the 5* pass in T2-4. Using the Hodgson (1993 a) model, the rolling loads over the entire temperature range (Figures lib-15b) are predicted within a ±5% range for all tests, except for some individual passes in Tl-2, Tl-4, T2-1 and T2-7. The accuracy of the recrystallization kinetics model was found to have a greater effect on the prediction of the rolling loads than the actual expression of the strain accumulation. The coefficient A in the strain accumulation Eq. (6.36) is reported to be between 0.5 and 1 (Hodgson and Gibbs, 1992). Simulations with each factor gave only minor differences, except for a lower applied strain. Overall, however, using a coefficient of unity in Eq. (6.36) and the Hodgson recrystallization model, (1993 a, 1993b), gave the most accurate predictions over the entire range of conditions studied. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
191 a)
b)
1.3-
[ •
test 2 strains 0.25
1.2 H
^ 1.H
1.25-1
1 11890C
+ •
2 1188°C
•
4 11930c
•
5 •11630C
1.10
*
6 12090c
1.05 H
[m
7 -11690C
test 2 strains 0.25
1.20
3 -11850C
1.15H
800
11890C
+
118800
• A
3 .11850C 4
11930c
• •
5
11630C
1.00 4 - - - - - - - * - - - V
1 1— 1000 1100 temperature, oc
6
12090c
7
11690C^
•
*"
/%>i
0.90 H
^' ^ « * i 1 900
1 2
[ •
0.95
1.0-^
0.9
[ •
0.85 800
1200
900
1000 1100 temperature, oc
1200
Figure 6.13 Measured (Fn,) to calculated (Fc) rolling load ratio for the test T2; (a) full recrystallization assumed, (b) kinetics of recrystallization accounted for, using Hodgson's model
a)
b)
1.41-1190OC
2 - 1042ocJ
1.3 H
1.25-
pF
1.20-
1-1190OC]
•
2 - 1042ocJ
•
•
1.151.10-
12 H
1.05-
:^ 1.1
.%-
1.00-
-
• •
•
•
0.95-
1.04 0.9
• 0.90-
test 3 strain 0.35 —I
800
900
\
1
\—
1000 1100 temperature, °C
test 3 strains 0.35
1200
8()0
900
1
1
1100 1000 temperatureJ, oc
12
Figure 6.14 Measured (Fm) to calculated (Fc) rolling load ratio for the test T3; (a) full recrystallization assumed, (b) kinetics of recrystallization accounted for, using Hodgson's model In Figure 6.12, (a) and (b) show the results obtained assuming full recrystallization and with Hodgson's model, respectively. The strains were increased and the effect of a strain of 0.25 is shown in Figure 6.13, (a) and (b) and of 0.35, in Figures 6.14, (a) and (b). Similar results are given in Figures 6.15 and 6.16, for tests 4 and 5. MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
192 a)
b) 1.5-|
1.4-1
f •
1-1169<<:
• i#
2-1171«K:
1.25 n
r •
2-1171
[ •
3-11770C
1.15
1.3
1-11690C
•
1.20
3-117700^
1.10 ^E 105-1
1.2
1.00 H
#--fr
1.1 -I
••
0.95 1.0 Htest 4 finishing strains 0.15 0.9 1 \ \ 700 800 900 1000 1100 temperature, ^C
0.90 0.85
test 4 finishing strains 0.15 1 \ 900 1000 1100 1200 temperature, oc
n 800
700
1200
•% ^
Figure 6.15 Measured (Fm) to calculated (Fc) rolling load ratio for the test T4; (a) full recrystallization assumed, (b) kinetics of recrystallization accounted for, using Hodgson's model
a)
b) 1.3n
( •
i-ii6yc)
( •
1-1169
1.201.15-
1.2 H
1.10-
^
1.H
E
1.05-
LU
1.000.95-
1.0-h test 5 finishing strains 0.15 0.9 n \— 800 900 1000 1100 temperature, oC
^*
1200
V"" •
0.90- • 0.85800
V
• •
test 5 finishing strains 0.15 1
900
i
1
1000 1100 temperature, OQ
1
1200
Figure 6.16 Measured (Fm) to calculated (Fc) rolling load ratio for the test T5; (a) fiill recrystallization assumed, (b) kinetics of recrystallization accounted for, using Hodgson's model
The time for 5% strain induced precipitation was estimated by both models and compared to the time for 5% recrystallization. Typical results obtained for the test T2-2 are presented in Figure 6.18. Precipitation was predicted to stop recrystallization at about 900°C using the Hodgson model (1993a) and at about 840''C, using Dutta and Sellars' model (1987). ThereMA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
193^ fore, the precipitation does not account for the deviation in load observed earlier in Figures 6.12a-6.16a, when assuming full recrystallization during all interpass times. It can be concluded that for the low niobium steel, the solute drag effect is responsible for the retardation of recrystallization in the temperature range between 950 and lOOO^C, where the strain accumulation is predicted.
Dutta and Sellars, 1987 Hodgson, 1993a
5% precipitation 5% recrystallization 95% recrystallization] n 900
1 — — t 1000 1100 temperature, oc
Figure 6.17 Comparison of the predicted fi"actional softening by 2 models for the test T2-2
900
1000 1100 temperature, oC
1200
Figure 6.18 Evolution of recrystallization and precipitation times predicted by two models for the test T2-2
The evolution of the microstructure during rolling of the niobium steel was also investigated (Pietrzyk et al., 1995a). Samples quenched after pass number 3 (1040°C) and 5 (940''C) for the tests T2 showed fully and partially recrystallized microstructures in the center of the strip, respectively. However, when quenched after pass 6 at 870°C, the microstructure was pancaked (i.e. non-recrystallized). This change in microstructure corresponds to the deviation of the experimental rolling loads from those predicted assuming complete recrystallization between passes. The average austenite grain size for the tests T2, calculated using the FEM and the equation given in Table 6.5 for niobium steels, was in good agreement with the measurements (Figure 6.19). The starting austenite grain size was measured to be 100 jLon. As the number of deformations increased and the temperature decreased, the austenite grain size was refined to lOjjm. These measurements reflect the combination of both recrystallization and grain growth. The FE model predicted that grain growth, calculated using Eq. (6.16) with the coefficients relevant for a C-Mn-Nb steel, had an important contribution during the interpass time at high temperatures. Without the incorporation of this component, the prediction of the microstructure and changes in recrystallization behavior were inaccurate. The investigation presented above was performed for a low niobium steel. It is expected that higher niobium steels will behave in a different manner. Additional experiments for these MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
194 steels have been performed by Majta et al, (1996). Since Hodgson's model (1993a) is not valid for the niobium contents above 0.035%, only Dutta and Sellars' model (1987) has been validated. The experiment included hot rolling of a high niobium steel with the chemical composition given in Table 6.3, obtained as 12 mm thick strips. The hyperbolic sine equation, Eq. (3.24), with K = 100, p = 0.2, A = 2xl0" and m = 0.2, was used to calculate the flow stress. The experiment was conducted on a two-high laboratory mill with work rolls of 150 mm diameter. The mill was instrumented to measure the rolling loads. Since previous experiments confirmed good accuracy of the thermal model, the temperatures were not measured in the present tests and predictions of the model were used in the analysis. Four passes were performed with strains of about 0.35. The process was interrupted at various stages, the sample was quenched, and the microstructure at the cross section was measured. The objective of the analysis was an assessment of the importance of accounting for the microstructure evolution in the modeling of rolling loads. Similarly, as for the low niobium steel, thefirstset of calculations was performed assuming full recrystallization during interpass times. The results are presented in the form of measured to calculated roll force ratios, as shown in Figure 6.20. This ratio is close to unity for the first two passes, and it increases in the remaining two passes. It is concluded that recrystallization is not completed after passes 2 and 3. 100
I
Q—
80-11|- -^- 0
60
calculations, T2-41
1.4
calculations, T2-5i measurements
1-2-1
A
.1.1-1
+
A
full recrystallization assumed
-}-
retained strain accounted for^
40 H 1.0 20
0.9
0 700
800
Q pancacked grains 1 1 1 1 900 1000 1100 1200 temperature, °C
Figure 6.19 Evaluation of the measured and predicted austenite grain size
0.8 900
1 950
1 1 1000 1050 temperature, °C
1 1100
1150
Figure 6.20 Measured (Fm) to calculated (Fc) roll force ratio during rolling of a high Nb steel
The calculations were repeated using the complete model, accounting for the recrystallization kinetics and the retained strain. Some improvement in the rolling force calculations was observed (Figure 6.19), but at low temperatures the measured force still exceeded the calculated one by 18%, suggesting that in the real process, recrystallization was slower than predicted by the model. Measurements and calculations of the grain size supplied additional information regarding the accuracy of the model. Calculated temperatures, austenite grain size, recrystallized volume fraction and retained strain, as well as the measured austenite grain size in four passes, are presented in Table 6.23. The detailed applicability of the strain induced precipitation model is not fiilly validated. For low niobium steels the recrystallization was initially halted by solute drag. Running the MA THEMA TJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
195 model for some scenarios without the strain induced precipitation included some cases where recrystallization due to the strain accumulation would have been expected. Hence, at least qualitatively, it appears that strain induced precipitation, which then eliminates any subsequent recrystallization, is occurring during the rolling experiments. From a modeling perspective this only requires the strain induced precipitation to be predicted at any time prior to the onset of recrystallization through strain accumulation.
Table 6.23 Austenite grain size, recrystallized volume fraction and retained strains during 4-pass rolling of high Nb steel pass temperature grain size recrystallized retained strain grain size measured, [xm calculated, jam volume fraction 1 1128 0.00 1.0 82 100±15 2 1045 0.8 0.21 74 66±8 3 0.43 956 0.75 66 56±10 4 0.69 907 0.1 61 56+15
All tests described above involve reasonably long interpass times, characteristic of the reverse plate rolling processes. Some more information regarding the performance of the microstructure evolution models is supplied by the experiments carried out by Kedzierski et al. (1996) and by Pietrzyk et al. (1997). The objective of these experiments was to investigate the behavior of low niobium steels during hot deformation with short interpass times. The set of three roller dies, described in section 6.3.1 (Figure 6.3), was used in these tests. The drawing schedules were similar to those performed for the carbon-manganese steel. Strains and interpass times used in all tests are given in Table 6.24. As before, the models by Dutta and Sellars (1987) and by Hodgson (1993a, 1993b) were tested. The results agreed with expectations, and because of this, the observations and conclusions were not very revealing. Metallography has shown that recrystallization has not started in any of the tests, even during the longest interpass times, confirmed by Hodgson's model (1993a). Typical austenite microstructure after the 3-pass test is shown in Figure 6.21a. The results of calculations and measurements of the process parameters are presented in Table 6.25, where DS is the Dutta and Sellars model (1987), and H indicates Hodgson's model (1993a, 1993b). Dutta and Sellars' model (1987), predicted the start of recrystallization in some of the tests correaly. The results concerning precipitation during rolling with short interpass times are not very revealing, either. Replicas did not show precipitates for all variations, in which the calculated time for 5% precipitation /o.o5/> exceeded the interpass time. Precipitates were observed when to.osp was much shorter than the interpass time, see for example Figure 6.21b, where the replica for the test 9 in Tables 6.24 and 6.25 is shown. Lack of consistency in the comparison between the predicted /o.osp and metallography was observed when to.osp was comparable with the interpass time. It should be pointed out, however, that precipitation kinetics depends strongly on the relative contents of such elements as carbon, nitrogen, niobium and aluminum in steel. Small fluctuations of these contents can have a noticeable influence on the precipitaMICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
196 tion start time and as a result, precipitation processes are very complex and difficult to model. Since the tested models are semi-empirical, they cannot be generalized. Table 6.24 Parameters of the experimental hot strip drawing tests for low niobium steels interpass times strains test number of thickness s passes mm 1.6 0.248 1 1 6.48/4.87 0.8/1.4 2 0.248/0.255 2 6.45/4.85/3.76 1.7 3 0.253 1 6.48/4.84 4 2 1.45/2.25 0.245/0.237 6.42/4.85/3.7 5 0.25/0.24/0.207 1.8/1.5/1.6 3 6.48/4.85/3.69/2.93 6 2 0.254/0.241 0.7/8.3 6.5/4.85/3.69 7 1.6/1.7 2 0.246/0.239 6.44/4.86/2.69 8 1.6 1 0.411 6.44/3.79 9 0.254/0.231/0.192 2.1/1.6/3.6 3 6.51/4.856/3.73/3.015 10 3 0,25/0.235/0.192 0.9/0.8/1.2 6.48/4.86/3.72/3.01 11 2 0.25/0.0293 0.9/2.0 6.48/4.86/3.434 12 2 1.7/1.2 0.25/0.386 6.48/4.86/2.98
Figure 6.21 (a) Elongated austenite grains after the test no.lO and (b) precipitates observed after the test no. 9, in Tables 6.19 and 6.20
Recapitulating the validation of the microstructure evolution models for the niobium steels, the conclusion can be drawn that the kinetics of recrystallization for these steels is affected by both solute drag and precipitation. The data presented are too limited to specify precisely under what conditions the solute drag effect prevails. It was observed by Pietrzyk et al. (1995a) that during multipass deformation of a low niobium steel, the recrystallization was retarded at the temperatures above the precipitation start temperature. This conclusion was confirmed by MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
197 metallography as none of the tested samples revealed precipitates. Precipitation was predicted by the model and observed by metallography in a few cases of strip drawing, in Tables 6.24 and 6.25 (Kedzierski et al., 1996). Precisely, these were the tests with longer interpass times (tests 9 and 10 in Table 6.20), when the temperature dropped while the straining was rather low.
Table 6.25 Results of calculations and measurements for hot drawing of low niobium steel T k:95x k. 05x ^.05/7 X 0 C test s S H DS DS H H meas. calc. DS H DS 1 0.32 0.02 16.7 32.9 0.48 8.53 6.27 105.9 984 2 0.28 0.02 42.26 81.6 0.28 5.19 3.67 66.9 1003 1.00 0.02 2.56 5.56 0.14 7.44 1.40 92.4 962 3 0.32 0.02 17.87 35.3 0.42 1026 7.21 130.5 965 975 4 0.28 0.02 56.76 53.0 0.43 8.62 7.09 109.4 975 984 0.48 0.01 2.41 3.85 0.34 22.20 6.30 301.9 900 917 5 0.28 0.02 17.03 33.6 0.54 11.20 8.87 143.4 968 972 0.28 0.01 1.96 3.13 0.53 23.30 7.38 329.4 908 913 0.04 0.00 0.72 0.88 2.49 64.40 20.7 972.3 860 855 6 0.21 0.01 22.68 47.7 0.35 5.90 4.37 79.3 980 994 1.00 0.03 2.39 3.74 0.09 12.90 1.25 241.9 865 875 7 0.34 0.02 25.06 50.7 0.4 8.70 6.36 18.0 980 983 0.36 0.01 2.42 3.70 0.42 18.80 6.37 259.7 915 921 8 0.78 0.01 3.52 6.90 0.08 17.70 2.34 243.6 920 927 9 0.03 0.00 8.04 16.2 18.3 92.10 125.9 1371 888 889 0.02 0.00 0.72 1.44 5.4 187.9 43.4 2835 842 841 0.01 0.00 0.36 0.72 7.7 497.2 60.1 7487 760 776 10 0.06 0.00 4.82 9.50 0.9 18.60 20.0 267.0 952 948 0.22 0.00 0.93 1.76 0.4 23.40 4.80 340.0 905 913 0.06 0.00 0.42 0.66 0.88 43.00 7.70 649.0 868 871 11 0.06 0.00 4.71 9.31 0.9 19.05 20.6 274.0 950 948 0.33 0.00 0.80 1.60 0.2 28.90 3.10 445.0 873 894 12 0.009 0.01 4.52 8.88 1.7 24.20 26.2 340.0 910 940 0.41 0.00 0.66 1.31 0.12 31.20 1.98 452.0 870 891
strips D fxm DS 100.2 103.4 38.5 99.9 103.7 82.1 103.0 99.3 123.0 107.9 36.0 99.3 92.8 54.2 120.8 123.0 123.0 118.5 103.9 123.0 118.6 93.0 116.4 84.0
H 121.6 121.9 121.2 121.7 121.7 122.0 121.7 122.4 123.0 122.2 123.0 121.5 122.2 122.1 122.8 123.0 123.0 122.7 122.7 123.0 122.7 123.0 122.5 123.0
Also beyond the scope of the limited number of hot rolling and drawing experiments described above is a discussion of the potential causes for deviation between the recrystallization models and the measurements, except to suggest that in the case of low niobium steels Hodgson's model performs reasonably well. In the case of data used for this model and the data generated by Pietrzyk et al, (1995a), there was significant thermomechanical processing of the austenite prior to the pass where the recrystallization was halted. Dutta et al., (1992) suggested that roughing can have a major effect on the kinetics of strain induced precipitation. However, this would not be expected to be a major cause here, since the difference appeared MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
198
.
in the early passes where solute drag seems to be the main cause for the retardation of recrystallization. The potential segregation of solutes and other impurities in reheated and nondeformed steels compared with extensively deformed steels may account for some of the differences. Also, the recrystallization model developed by Hodgson (1993a) was based on steels with low niobium while the data used by Dutta and Sellars (1987) was for higher niobium steels. Experiments carried out for 0.084%Nb steel (Figure 6.19) showed that the latter model improves, to some extent, the results of calculations of the rolling loads. It also predicts the grain size, which agrees well with the measurements. 6.3.3
Room temperature properties
Some typical experiments carried out to validate the models describing the metal's microstructure and mechanical properties at room temperature are presented in this section. The main focus is placed on niobium microalloyed steels. The rolling tests carried out by Pietrzyk et al., (1995a), and described above, involved measurements of the ferrite microstructure after cooling the samples in air. Analysis of micrographs for all tests shows that the microstructures were more nonhomogeneous for T2 and T4 than for Tl and T3 tests. A finer microstructure with a smaller volume fi-action of pearlite was observed at the surface, than at the center. The ferrite grain sizes for the tests Tl, T2, T3 and T4 for different start temperatures were measured and compared to the prediction and good agreement was observed as shown in Table 6.26. A lower start temperature, which resulted in a lower finishing temperature, yielded a larger ferrite grain size for the test Tl in the center. The surface displayed a smaller grain size than the center, especially for the tests T3 andT4.
Table 6.26 Measured and calculated ferrite grain size (^im) test center (start temperature) measured calculated Tl-l(118rC) 7.3 8 T1-3(1168°C) 8.4 8.2 T2-5(1163°C) 8.4 7.4 T2-6 (1209^0 8.4 7.4 7.4 T4.1(1169°C) 6.1 4.8 T4-1 (1187^0 6.1 T5-1 (1169^0 6.3 7.7
surface measured 5.5 6.4 7.0 7.0 6.3 3.3 3.6
calculated 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.5 5.0 4.6 6.0
Other experiments, aiming at an evaluation of mechanical properties at room temperatures, were carried out by Majta et al., (1995). The objective of the experiments, which included three-stage compression tests, was to obtain data concerning the effect of the thermomechanical history on room temperature properties. The isothermal tests were performed under constant true strain rate conditions with different length of interruption times between the compression cycles. The development of the microstructure, as affected by the delay times, was observed on the ferrite grain sizes and, in consequence, on the yield stress distribution in the MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
199 final product. The tested material was a high niobium steel containing 0.067%C, 1.3%Mn, 0.076%Nb, 0.024%Ti, 0.34%Si, 0.037%A1., 0.005%V, 0.035%Cr, 0.013%Cu and 0.0054%N. All samples were annealed and solution treated before testing. Each was fitted with a type K thermocouple, embedded at midpoint. A glass powder - alcohol emulsion was used as the lubricant.
200 n strain rate 2 s^*" temperature 975° C 160H
120-
r.
I STAGE
t
II STAGE
80
'
III STAGE
f
td^Os^
—
td= 0.3 s
-—-
td=20s^
40-
0.0
td=3s
0.2
0.4
0.6 strain
0.8
1.0
I 1.2
Figure 6.22. Continuous and interrupted stress-strain curves obtained for various delay times td.
600
700
780
850
950
finish deformation temperature, °C
^Jg^^e 6.23. Contribution of various components to strengthening as a function of the finishing temperature.
In the multi-stage tests, a strain of 0.37 was applied in every stage of the compression, chosen to avoid dynamic recrystallization during prestraining. The resulting stress-strain curves are shown in Figure 6.22, indicating, in the uninterrupted test, the presence of dynamic recovery only. The sample was deformed to a true strain of 0.37, unloaded and reloaded to a total strain of 0.74, then unloaded and reloaded again to the total final strain of 1.1. Each of the deformations was performed at a constant strain rate of 2 s"V The interruption times were 0.3, 3 and 20 s, respectively. The same delay times were used after full compression and before quenching in order to allow the estimation of the recrystallized austenite grain diameters. During interrupted compression tests, the delay time was constant for each stage. After deformation, the specimens were cooled in air at a cooling rate of 4 K/s. The amounts of fractional softening after each interruption are shown in Figure 6.22 and it is observed that, as expected, the softening increases with increasing interruption times. Of course, the fractional softening changes if the deformation per stage changes. The contribution of the various components to the strengthening of a microalloyed niobium steel is presented in Figure 6.23, as a function of the temperature at the last stage of deformation. As indicated, the increase in yield stress with decreasing finishing temperature Tm results primarily from the increase of the dislocation density. Beginning at the Ars temperature, which for the present steel is expected to be about 785°C, subgrain formation causes further increases in strength. The effect of using Eq. (6.22), the root of the sum of the squares sumMICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
200
mation, is also observable, showing that the effects of the other strengthening components decrease below Ars. The microstructures after various delay times are shown in Fig. 6.24. The lack of refinement of the ferrite structure is observed when the delay time is increased to 20 seconds, see Figures 6.24e and f The amount of statically recrystallized austenite also increased and the ferrite grain diameters are over 10 jim at some of the locations. Away from the center, the grains are observed to be still larger, probably indicating the decreasing axial pressures with increasing radial distances.
Center
2 mm from the center
J v^i'V't*"""!
"' ^i^.4-ii?f 0.3 s de/ay
-^V'" 20 urn
3 s delay
^ i.^
20unfi
e) :-;->
"{^' >;
20 urn
^ ^ y^
r-•%.. 20 s delay r y ^
20 urn
< ">'
20 ^m
Figure 6.24 Microstructure after various delay times during interrupted compression tests
A comparison of the yield stress calculated by Eq. (6.22) and those measured elsewhere by various researchers is shown in Figure 6.25. A large number of different steels of various chemicar compositions, as well as different reheating, deformation and cooling conditions have been incorporated in the figure. The comparison indicates good agreement between calculated and measured yield strengths, showing that Eq. (6.22), using the root of the sum of the MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPER TIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
201^ squares summation, is a reliable way of calculating the room temperature properties of steel subjected to thermal-mechanical treatment. Further proof of the predictive ability provided by the root of the sum of the squares summation is given in Figure 6.26. There, a comparison of the calculated yield strength by linear and r.s.s. method is illustrated, showing that as the finish deformation temperature decreases, the yield strength calculated by the linear summation predicts significantly higher values. This could lead to difficulties during subsequent planning using material strength. These differences increase when the TFD decreases, especially below ^rs.
800 CL
Figure 6.25 Computed yield stress compared with the measurements carried out by various authors
700 600
500 3
400
300 300
f A°
MO
D •
IR2
A
BA
+ T
GR
lo 400 500 600 700 measured yield strength, MPa
IR1
HE
C01 C02
MO - Morrison et al. (1993) IRl - Irvine and Baker (1976) IR2 - Irvine etal. (1967) HE - Keijan and Baker (1993) BA - Baker and McPherson (1979) GR - Greday and Lambergist (1976) COl-Coldrenetal. (1981) C02 - Coleman et al. (1973)
800
Figure 6.27 shows the comparison between yield strength calculated using Eq. (6.22) developed by Majta et al, (1995) and those proposed by several researchers. When the last deformation is at a temperature in the recrystallization region (finishing temperature 7}© = 975°C), the agreement among the calculated results is reasonably good. However, the predictions are more difficult for the lower TFDFigures 6.26, 6.27 and 6.28 show results obtainedfi-omthe finite-element model described in Chapter 5, coupled with the empirical microstructural relations given in this chapter. The results include the strain distribution after the second and the third stage, as well as final austenite and ferrite grain sizes. In thefigures,all grain sizes are given in |j,m. The measured austenite and ferrite grain diameters are also shown in the figures, written using bold font at the appropriate positions. Since the difference between strains for interpass times of 3 and 20 s was small (Figures 6.27a and b and 6.28), the grain sizes for the latter case are not shown. In order to demonstrate the abilities of the model. Figures 6.28, 6.29 and 6.30 show the development of the retained strain distributions for the three tested delay times. The true strains, calculated by the usual definition of Ludwik, are 0.37, 0.74 and 1.1, after each of the three stages of compression. However, the values of strain given in Figures 6.28, 6.29 and 6.30 include in this measure the effect of static recrystallization, occurring during the unloading periods. If the delay times during the interruptions are long enough (3 and 20 secMICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
202
^
onds, as in Figures 6.29 and 6.30), the distributions of strains after stages n and III are typical for a fully annealed material. When, due to a short delay time (0.3 seconds in Figure 6.28), the static recrystallization does not occur, the accumulated strains are expected to achieve larger values and their distributions are more complex. It is important to state here that these distributions have been calculated as a result of the complete history, including the deformation and the microstructural development. 900 800 (0 Q-
S
700
k
•
\
tjl- ———
\\
k
500
Irvine and BaKer (1984)
800
linear summation QL
2 700-1
\\
^
Gladman et al. (1976) Hodgson and Gibbs (1992) Le Bon and Saint-Martin (1976) Majta et al. (1995)
t 600 2
900
1 1 1.8. summation 1 1
teooH \ "^
(A ' * * •
•*-. 2 500
400
400 Hfinishing temperature 975^0
300 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 9501000 finishing temperature, °C
Figure 6.26 Yield stress as a function of thefinishingtemperature calculated using linear summation and r.s.s. method
300
-1 \ \ r 2 4 6 8 ferrite grain size, ^im
10
Figure 6.27 Yield stress as a function of the ferrite grain size calculated using various formulae
The distributions of austenite grain sizes after each of the loading cycles are presented in Figures 6.28b and 6.29b. When the deformation history is as presented in Figure 6.28, the final austenite grain size is generally smaller than in the case with longer unloading times. The deformation is more homogeneous in the latter case. There is, in general, an increase in the austenite grain diameters as the cylindrical surface or the tool/workpiece interface is approached. This increase is quite small for 0.3 and 3 seconds, in both the radial and axial directions, but reaches 25 - 30% when the delay time is 20 seconds, (Majta et al, 1995). Several competing mechanisms are operating here. As the cylindrical surface is approached, the cooling rate increases, leading to smaller grains. The strains are decreasing, however, with increasing radial distances, leading to less pancaking. The second mechanism appears to be dominant in the present instance in the radial direction. In the axial direction the cooling rates are smaller, since the compression rams are, at least initially, at the same temperature as the sample. As a result both mechanisms are co-operating in creating progressively larger grains. These figures also show that there is good agreement between the predictions and the experimental data. Because of the direct correlation between austenite grain size and ferrite grain size, similar differences in ferrite distributions are demonstrated in Figures 6.28c and 6.29c. The ferrite grains are approximately 20 - 25% smaller than the austenite grains. The variations in ferrite grain size in the axial and radial directions are considerably smaller than MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
203 those observed for the austenite grains. Again, the agreement between the calculated and measured grain size distributions is quite good. The differences are a few percent.
a)
b) rlO.68 £
tp = 0.3 s P
austenite grain size, ^(,m
E A
Figure 6.28 Distribution of the effective strain after the second and third stages (a), austenite grain size (b) and ferrite grain size (c) after the third stage for the interpass times of 0.3 s; Isolines represent the calculated, and bold face numbers, the measured grain size
a)
b) tp = 3 s
effective strain
tp = 3 s
austenite grain size, /xm
Figure 6.29 Distribution of the effective strain after the second and third stages (a), austenite grain size (b) and ferrite grain size (c) after the third stage for the interpass time of 0.3 s; Isolines represent the calculated, and bold face numbers, the measured grain size MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
204
The yield strength distributions for the tp = 20 s effective strain investigated tests, as predicted by Eq. (6.20), are presented by Majta et al. (1995). The effect of increasing ferrite refinement is seen there, with the finest ferrite grains corresponding to the highest values of yield strength. As expected, the largest yield strength, 460 MPa at the center, corresponds to the shortest delay time when essentially no softening occurred after the first loading. As the delay was increased by a factor of ten, the yield strength at the r, mm center decreased to 450 MPa, a drop of about 2%. With the 20-second delay the Figure 6.30 Distribution of the effective yield strength dropped by another 2% to strain after the second and third stages 442 MPa. While these changes are not exof compression cessive, the possibility of changing the metal's strength by thermo-mechanical treatment was demonstrated and correctly predicted. A number of experiments was performed to illustrate the predictive capability of the equations, describing the mechanical properties of steels at room temperatures, developed by Kuziak et al., (1997). The selected data for 13 specimens, containing the type of product and steel chemical composition, are listed in Table 6.27. Table 6.28 contains results of calculations of microstructural parameters, as well as a comparison of the measured and predicted yield stress for these specimens. The best-fit equations developed for the average yield stress and ultimate tensile strengths, on the basis of data obtained from all tested specimens, are given in Table 6.15 (lower yield stress). Table 6,16 (contribution of precipitates) and Table 6.17 (tensile strength). Major differences distinguishing these equations from those developed by Gladman, (1972) consist of i) a linear law of mixtures for the yield-strength calculation; and ii) an inclusion of the nonlinear dependence of the ultimate tensile strength on the pearlite interlamellar spacing. The latter followed earlier observations that the pearlite interlamellar spacing plays a significant role in shaping the uhimate tensile strength when the ferrite loses its continuity in the microstructure. The predictive ability of the equations, developed by Kuziak et al., (1997), is confirmed by the experimental results given in Table 6.28. Notation in this table is as follows: Xf is the volumefractionof pearlite, Da is the ferrite grain size. So is the interlamellar spacing in pearlite, ay is the lower yield stress, and cju is the ultimate tensile strength. Zurek et al., (1998) investigated the effect of strain rate and two-phase deformation on the mechanical properties after thermomechanical processing of a niobium steel, containing 0.067%C, 1.3%Mn, 0.34%Si 0.037%A1. 0.076%Nb and 0.024%Ti. The uniaxial compression tests were conducted in a range of strain rates from 10 s'* to 50 s"^ using a tensioncompression testing machine. A split Hopkinson pressure bar was used for the strain rate of 2500 s" Each of the experiments was performed at a range of temperatures corresponding to austenite, two-phase and ferrite regions. Typical stress-strain curves obtained during these MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
205^
experiments are presented in Figure 6.31. As expected, only a small influence of the temperature on the flow stress is observed in the fastest test.
Table 6.27 Selected chemical compositions and forms of the steel products used for the development of the microstructure versus mechanical properties relationships composition
steel product form
No
C
Mn
Si
P
S
N
1.
0.04
0.23
0.05
0.010
0.015
0.008
2.
0.05
0.31
0.05
0.010
0.016
0.007
10-mm-diam. rod
3.
0.18
0.57
0.26
0.028
0.026
0.009
12-mm-diam. rod
4.
0.65
0.52
0.21
0.014
0.012
0.006
10-mm-diam. rod
5.
0.19
1.20
0.33
0.019
0.021
0.007
12-mm-diam. rod
6.
0.22
1.23
0.34
0.059
0.038
0.009
14-mm-diam. rod
7.
0.33
1.20
0.52
0.015
0.028
0.008
8-mm-diam. rod
8.
0.20
1.15
0.35
0.044
0.029
0.005
8-mm-diam. rod
9.
0.19
1.31
0.36
0.024
0.030
0.007
I-beam
10.
0.18
1.32
0.35
0.023
0.028
0.008
I-beam
11.
0.20
1.32
0.39
0.033
0.022
0.009
I-beam
12.
0.48
0.86
0.22
0.026
0.024
13.
0.42
1.01
0.61
0.029
0.042
0.009 0.007
20-mm-thick plate
8-mm-diam. rod
I-beam
Metallography carried out by Majta et al, (1997) and by Zurek et al, (1998) shows that the refinement of the ferrite grains is much stronger for the specimens strained at 750°C and 800°C than those strained at 850°C. Moreover, a low finishing temperature results in more nonhomogeneous ferrite microstructure. This is probably due to the different amounts of strain concentrated in austenite and ferrite phases at these temperatures. The influence of the strain rate on the ferrite microstructure is shown in Figure 6.32. The ferrite grains in the specimens deformed at low strain rates are finer than expected. The coarser grains obtained after faster deformation (50 s"^) are probably due to the faster static recrystallization and grain growth after recrystallization. Again, the nonhomogeneity of the microstructure is very pronounced at 700°C, probably due to nonuniform conditions of transformation in the volume of the sample. More uniform microstructure is observed in the experiments, conducted at 850°C. Simulation of microstructural phenomena, which take place in the two-phase region, is very difficuh. There is still a lack of reliable models able to describe this process adequately.
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
206 Table 6.28 Measured microstructural parameters and strength properties of the products specified in Table 6.27 compared with the predictions based on the equations by Kuziak et al, (1997) given in Tables 6.15, 6.16 and 6.17 No
strength properties
measured microstructural parameters
CJy,
cr„, MPa
MPa predicted
measured
predicted
Xf
Da, |im
&, \im
measured
1 2
0.90
23.6
0.220
278
232
390
408
0.91
18.8
0.201
272
240
417
405
3
0.78
18.4
0.168
331
328
530
509
4
0.15
8.20
0.245
450
437
630
793
5
0.71
13.9
0.155
380
395
582
542
6
0.65
10.6
0.182
421
447
635
600
7
0.51
9.73
0.158
482
461
690
654
8
0.57
9.10
0.158
430
452
636
613
9
0.61
17.2
0.182
402
398
550
575
10
0.67
15.1
0.185
400
402
567
565
11
0.64
19.2
0.221
390
393
582
576
12
0.20
9.43
0.230
460
453
770
780
13
0.34
10.5
0.213
448
452
750
740
b) 400-| strain rate 2500 s -"'
800 *C .700°C VSOoC
strain rate: ^2500 s-^
350300-
^
S. 250-
50 s -1 1.0 s-""
CO 2 0 0 co % 150-
"0.001 s-""
10050-|r^
0.00
0.05
0.10
"1 1 0.15 0.20 Strain
1 0.25
1 0.30
temperature SOQoC
fi f
U 1
0.00
0.05
0.10
1
1
0.15
0.20
strain
1 0.25
1 0.30
Figure 6.31 Effect of the strain rate and temperature on the stress-strain curves for a Nb steel MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
207
700X 0.001 s"'
700°C 50 s''
850°C 0.001 s'^
850°C 50 s-'
Figure 6.32 Ferrite microstructure of specimens deformed at strain rates 0.001 s^' (a,c) and 50 s'^ (b,d) at temperatures 700°C (a,b) and 850°C (c,d).
6.4
THE INTERNAL VARIABLE METHOD
In the previous chapters, the modeling of material properties and the evolution of the microstructure during hot metal forming processes have been based on semi-empirical equations, which describe the yield stress controlled by the hardening and softening phenomena. The external variables, including the temperature, strain rate and strain, are the input parameters for the models. The shortcomings of this approach are obvious and they derive from the inability of the strain to represent the state of a hot-worked metal under non-steady conditions. Current finite-element models are able to quantify the complete thermomechanical history of the workpiece. They show that all elements undergo variations in strain rate and temperature, and these variations depend on the locations of the elements (see the typical results in Chapter 5). Furthermore, some of the elements have complex strain path histories. Even in geometrically simple processes like flat rolling, elements near the surface are subjected to a reverse shear strain. Figure 6.33 shows the calculated distributions of the longitudinal strain, the shear strain and the effective strain, during rolling of a 20 mm thick plate with a reduction of 0.2. Reversing shear strains are clearly seen in this figure. The shear strains have been calculated by an integration of the shear strain rates along the flow lines. The integration leads to almost zero shear strains at the exit plane. Distribution of the longitudinal strain through the thickness at the exit is unifonn. Effective strains, which account for the contribution of the reversing shear strains, are distributed non-uniformly, with the lowest values in the center of the plate. The results in Figure 6.33 show that accounting for the history of deformation is necessary in the modeling of hot deformation processes.
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
208 longitudinal strain Ey 10 E E
V^^YY1=?
5
if? o o i> o ai^ ^
^
%'%'<^%'^;^\% S^ :r:.:
10 15 20 25 30 36 40 45 50 55 60 65 X, mm shear strain ^^v J
AL
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 X, mm effective strain Sj 10
E E >i
5
V^^m..
0 10
20
30
40
X, mm Figure 6.33 Calculated distributions of the longitudinal strain, shear strain and effective strain during rolling of 20 mm thick plate, reduction 0.2
The conventional microstructure evolution models are not capable of taking advantage of the ability of thefinite-elementtechniques to predict variations of the process parameters and complexity of the strain path in various forming processes. Since the microstructure evolves through thermally activated processes, which continue in the absence of deformation, the strain is not a state variable at elevated temperatures. Other variables are, therefore, necessary to represent the true state of the material. In recent years, modeling hot deformation behavior has increasingly been based on the physical phenomena within the material. These models are based on the so-called internal state variables, which, may be scalars, vectors or tensors. The most commonly used internal state variable models involve features such as internal dislocation density, subgrain size and subgrain boundary misorientation (see for example Brown and Wlassich, 1992, Sellars, 1997). Both internal and external state variables provide sufficient information to describe a particular phenomenon accurately. Sandstrom and Lagneborg (1975a and 1975b) suggested a model for hot working and recrystallization, based on the dislocation density as an internal state variable. More recently, Mecking and Kocks, (1981), and Estrin and Mecking, (1984), have proposed similar approaches. These publications give a description of the stress-strain relationship, which considers the dependence of the process on strain hardening and fractional softening. Possibilities of the application of numerical techniques to the solution of complex problems in materials MA THEMA TJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA IJON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
209 science were limited in the 1970s and early 1980s. Therefore, the solutions of the dislocation density equations were performed for isothermal conditions, and the advantages of this model could not be exposed. Rapid development of computers and numerical techniques during late the 1980s and 1990s allowed for an extensive qualitative change in this approach. The objective of further work was the implementation of the internal variable model into finite-element programs, which simulate metal flow and heat transfer in industrial forming processes (Pietrzyk 1993, Pietrzyk, 1994). In what follows, a description of the internal variable approach, based on the dislocation density is given, as presented in numerous publications. Notable among these are the works of Sandstrom and Lagneborg, (1975a and 1975b); Mecking and Kocks (1981); Estrin and Mecking, (1984); Alden, (1987); Brown and Wlassich, (1992); Pietrzyk, (1994); Davies, (1994); Estrin (1996); and Sellars, (1997). Further examples of the application of this model to the simulation of hot forming processes are presented. 6.4.1
General frame of the model
A general fi-ame for the model is given on the basis of its application as a constitutive law, as described in detail by Estrin, (1996). He shows how the problem of constitutive modeling can be reduced to operating with scalar instead of tensorial quantities. The components of the tensor of total strain rate e, are given by the sum of the elastic and plastic components, f *and e^, respectively: e = e^+e^
(6.38)
The elastic component obeys Hooke's law, while the plastic component of the strain rate tensor is given by the Levy-Mises Eq. (5.2). In this equation, the Huber-Mises equivalent quantities are used: sf = j—sfjsfj V3 -^ -^ and
-if
(effective plastic strain rate)
(JijCJij (effective stress)
(6.39)
(6.40)
This implies plastic isotropy of the deformed material. The specifics of the model is due to a particular form of the equation, relating the effective plastic strain rate and the effective stress referred to as a kinetic equation (Mecking and Kocks, 1981; Estrin and Mecking, 1984). Thus, the problem of constitutive modeling is reduced to operating with scalar, rather than tensorial quantities. The character of the experimental data obtained in plastometric tests offers a suitable form of the kinetic equation. A power-law is the most commonly used form: (6.41)
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
210 where according to Estrin (1996), G^ is the internal variable representing the state of the material, while ^0 ai^d f^ are material parameters. Since the temperature dependence of the plastic strain rate is included in the stress exponent w, Eq. (6.41) obeys the Arrhenius law for thermally activated plastic flow by dislocation glide. The parameter e^ is proportional to the density of mobile dislocations. Another variation of the kinetic equation, in which the Arrhenius law is preserved, is (Kocks et al., 1975):
- ^ - ^ o e x p ^ - - ^ 1-
(6.42)
where AGo is the Gibbs free energy of activation at zero stress, <j is the Boltzman constant, p and q are material parameters determined from fitting the sf versus o} curve, and ^o ^s a constant. At the limit of 0 Eq. (6.42) yields a finite plastic strain rate. Thus, a definite nonzero plastic strain rate corresponds to any value of stress, however small that may be. The model is thus characterized by no yielding or loading/unloading conditions. A number of constitutive models (Mecking and Kocks, 1981; Estrin and Mecking, 1984) share this property. The kinetic equation refers to a stable microstructure, that is, to a constant value of the internal variable a^. However, since the microstructure varies in hot metal forming processes, a separate equation is needed to describe the evolution of G^ :
^
= f{p,,erj)
(6.43)
According to this equation the rate of change of the internal variable G^ is determined by its current value and no memory or path dependent effects are included. Once the concrete form of the function/is specified, the constitutive formulation is complete. The analysis presented above implies that the quantity G^ is the sole internal state variable that represents the microstructural state of a material (Estrin and Mecking, 1984). However, it can generally be expected that several internal structural variables are needed to describe the mechanical response of a material. These variables are characterized by different rates of relaxation towards their steady state values. The steady state value of a particular internal variable can be considered to be dynamic one, since it is governed by current values of slower internal variables still evolving towards their steady state (Estrin and Mecking, 1984). As the deformation proceeds, more and more internal variables will reach steady state. Eventually, at large strains, the slowest-evolving internal variable will govern the rest. In the above formulation, the total dislocation density is considered to be that slowest variable. The examples of modeling plastic deformation given below demonstrate that for continuous monotonic straining, a one^intemal-variable model is sufficient. More sophisticated models with two and more internal variables can be invoked if rapid changes in deformation conditions or cyclic loading are to be accounted for (Estrin, 1996). MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
2n^ 6.4.2
Hardening and recovery
The general framework of the one-internal variable model is presented on the basis of the research of Mecking and Kocks, (1981). Their model, known in the scientific literature as the Kocks-Mecking model (K-M model) is the fundamental approach and has pointed the direction for later developments and more recent theories. The model is based on the kinetic relationship in the form of Eq. (6.42), where the internal variable <J^ is related to the total dislocation density p: a^=Mj,aGby[p
(6.44)
where G is the shear modulus, b is the Burgers vector, MT is the average Taylor factor and a is a constant. The model implies that the strength of the material is determined by dislocation-dislocation interactions. All other sources of resistance to dislocation glide are disregarded at this stage. Arguments justifying this choice of the internal variable and proving that Eq. (6,44) can be assumed to have general validity are given by Kocks et al., (1975). The Taylor factor Mr accounts for the texture evolution and will not be considered here. The evolution equation for the dislocation density p is derived accounting for the concurrent effects of storage and recovery. The storage term is written by expressing a shear strain increment, in terms of the dislocation density increment associated with immobilization of mobile dislocations at impenetrable obstacles after they have traveled a distance /:
In Eq. (6.45), s represents the plastic strain. Since elastic deformation will not be discussed further, the index p is omitted. To include dynamic recovery, one can consider the annihilation of stored dislocations, which involves their leaving the glide planes on which they are stored. This is frirnished by the cross-slip of screw dislocations or the climb of the edge dislocations. The first process prevails at low and the second at high temperatures. Inclusion of a dynamic recovery term in Eq. (6.45) yields:
where the recovery coefficient is strain rate and temperature dependent:
^2 ~ ""20
H-i
(6.47)
In Eq. (6.47) feo is a constant. The temperature dependence of fe at high temperatures is contained in the Arrhenius term in Eq. (6.47), while /? is a constant, typically about 4. In the low temperature range, the temperature dependence is contained in «, for which case n is inMICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
212
versely proportional to T, while the Arrhenius term is omitted. In Eq. (6.47) Qs represents the activation energy for dislocation climb, equal to that for self-diffusion (Estrin and Mecking, 1984). Eq. (6.46) can be expressed in the form of the time derivative of the dislocation density: ^ = ±.-k^pe at bl
(6.48)
The recovery processes included in the above equations are of dynamic origin. Static recovery, in which a decrease of the dislocation density is proportional to the corresponding time increment, can be included in Eq. (6.48): ^-^ = fj-k.ps-K
(6.49)
Assuming that static recovery is driven by the stress determined by the square root of the current dislocation density, a reasonable phenomenological model for the static recovery coefficient, 7?v, is (Estrin, 1996): i^=/?,oexp|-^|sinh ' ^ 1
(6-50)
where i?vo, Co and C\ are constants. The form of the evolution Eq. (6.50) for the dislocation density provides a possibility of incorporating metallurgical characteristics and microstructural features of a material into the model. In a material which is coarse-grained and single-phase the only kinds of obstacles to moving dislocations will be those related to the dislocation structure itself and those provided by the grain boundaries. Regardless of how the dislocations are arranged, whether completely at random or in a cell or subgrain boundary structure, the mean free path of dislocations / is proportional to p~^-^. Since the free path / is usually much smaller than the grain size of the material, Eq. (6.48) becomes:
-^^Ke4p~k^pe
(6.51)
where k\ and k2 are constants, with k2 being given by Eq. (6.47). The constitutive Eq. (6.51) can be integrated analytically, at least for the case of uniaxial deformation with constant plastic strain rate (Mecking and Kocks, 1981) and for constant stress creep (Estrin and Mecking, 1984). The hardening term in Eq. (6.51) has to be changed when the density of geometrical obstacles becomes larger than that of the obstacles caused by other dislocations in the population. The mean free path / is then identified with the spacing between these geometrical obstacles, d. Assuming that the distance between the obstacles does not change during the deformation and, further, that the obstacles do not affect the recovery coefficient ^2, their only influence on MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
213 the flow stress will be through the effect on the rate of dislocation density. The kinetic equation is then still given by Eq. (6.51), whereas the evolution equation for dislocation density is written as:
f = ±-.,p.
(6.52)
It should be mentioned here that Sandstrom and Lagneborg, (1975a, 1975b), and Roberts and Ahlblom, (1978), adopt a recovery term derived from Friedel's treatment (1964) of the climb controlled dislocation network. This approach is related to the probability of dislocations meeting and annihilating one another, which is proportional to ^\
The constantfeis defined as: ^3 = I'M
(6.54)
where M is the dislocation mobility which, in a pure metal, is directly related to the selfdiffusion coefficient, and ris the dislocation line energy. Kocks and Mecking (1981) have argued that Friedel's development is based on a model for static rather than dynamic recovery and some caution must be exercised in its application. A particular case in which the model represented by Eq. (6.52) or (6.53) will be applied is that of grain boundary hardening. Estrin, (1996) points out, however, that the limiting case of the grain size being the smallest characteristic length in the struaure applies only for the submicron grain sizes, when J<10p"°^. The modified constitutive model now given by Eq. (6.52) allows simple integration. The above considerations apply if geometrical obstacles outnumber the dislocationstructure related ones. In a more general case, when a superposition of the immobilizing effects of both types of obstacles is considered, the inverse obstacle spacing Ml in Eq. (6.50) can be expressed as a linear combination of the inverse spacings of the two types of obstacles taken separately. The resulting evolution equation for dislocation density (Estrin and Mecking, 1984) is: ^^^s[^^k,fp\^-k^p8
(6.55)
Estrin (1996) presents an integration of the constitutive model Eq. (6.55). He also shows other applications of the model based on the kinetic Eq. (6.42), for example, to describe plastic deformation of other systems where the dislocation mean free path is constrained by microstructural elements, such as precipitates or second-phase particles. The methodology described above can be used to account for the particle effects on the deformation behavior. The constitutive model based on the kinetic Eq. (6.42) can also be formulated for materials conMICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND AdECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
214 taining a dispersion of non-shareable second-phase particles, such as non-coherent precipitates, oxide or carbide dispersions. 6.4.3
Recrystallization
The theory described in the previous section is suitable for modeling situations in which dislocation interactions resuh in an immediate response of the system, which is dynamic recovery. In industrial processes, however, this is not always the case. It is well-known, and can be confirmed by experiments, that an excess of stored energy leads to the occurrence of recrystallization (see Section 6.1). This, in turn, implies a delay in the system's response, while the required excess of energy accumulates and can be mathematically simulated by the modification of Eq. (6.52). This modification involves a parameter, that accounts for the development of the dislocation population (stored energy), to the point at which widespread elimination of dislocations is observed. Thus, recrystallization is a discrete process, which requires that some threshold of stored energy is exceeded and which needs some time to be completed. Therefore, there can always be a situation in which neighboring areas in the material have different values of the internal variable. It seems that a proper approach to this problem requires an analysis of the distribution of the internal variable within some small volume of the material. This approach will be discussed in the following sections, while a simplified model, assuming an average dislocation density is described first. Davies (1994) claims that dislocations can be treated en masse without losing any of the detail that determines the behavior of a material. While hardening and recovery in this approach are described by Eq. (6.52), the modeling of recrystallization is not as evident. Davies (1994) proposes the use of a so-called development strain, which accounts for the stored energy and controls the onset of dynamic recrystallization. The most simplified application of this concept assumes that the influence of hardening and recovery on the flow stress is well described by one of the stress-strain functions, discussed in Chapter 3. Kusiak et al. (1996) considered the hyperbolic sine equation, Eq. (3.24) for this purpose. Thus, since the dislocation density is proportional to the square of the flow stress, the following relationship is obtained:
^(0= > w ( O f -\A[a{t-t;j^dt
(6.56)
where a{t) is the flow stress accounting for dynamic recrystallization, (JHRv(t) is the flow stress calculated from Eq. (3.24), but using time t as an independent variable, and tc is the time correlating to the critical value of development strain. Constant A in Eq. (6.56) depends on the temperature, strain rate and grain size. Application of the inverse technique yields the following relationship (Kusiak et al., 1996):
where D is the austenite grain size, s is the strain rate, R is the gas constant and T is the absolute temperature. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
215 Eq. (6.56) was validated for the compression of cylindrical samples measuring 4.5 mm in diameter and 9 mm in height. A detailed description of the experiment is given by Kusiak et al., (1996). Single-stage and two-stage compression tests were performed at various temperatures and strain rates. The chemical composition of the steel was: 0.49%C, 0.72%Mn, 0.55%Si, 0.01%P, 0.008%S, 0.14%Cu, 3.26%Cr, 0.48%Ni, 0.44%Mo, 0.11%V, 0.009%N and 0.04%A1. The interpass times for the two-stage tests varied between 1 and 10 s. Typical results of the comparison of the measured and calculated compression stress are presented in Figure 6.34 There are two theoretical curves in each plot, both calculated by the finiteelement model. One curve was obtained using constitutive Eq. (3.24), and the second using the current model (6.56) as a constitutive law. Analysis of the plots in Figure 6.34 and all the results presented by Kusiak et al. (1996) shows that significant improvements of the accuracy of simulation were obtained when Eq. (6.56), which accounts for the dynamic recrystallization, was used. The interpass time in the two-stage compression (Figure 6.34b) was 1.4 s. Since the steel contained elements which retard the recrystallization, the material has not completely softened. As seen in Figure 6.35, the recrystallized volume fraction varied between zero below the die to about 0.45 in the center of the sample. In consequence, the stored energy accumulated in the second stage of compression and dynamic recrystallization was triggered.
a)
b)
400-
400-1 I temperature 845°C strain rate 0.5/0.8 s-"" interpass time 1.4 s
temperature 843oC strain rate 0.65 s-*"
300-
soon (0 Q.
Q.
IE
200
200
100-
measurement
100 H I
0-t 0.0
1 0.2
[—O— calculation, eq. (6.56)J \ \ \ 1 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Strain
measurement -0—
calculation, eq. (3.24)
0-f 0.0
calculation, eq. (3.24)
i—O— calculation, eq. (6.56)J T \ \ 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 strain
Figure 6.34 Measured and calculated stress for single-stage (a) and two-stage (b) compression
6.4.4
Average dislocation density model
A more advanced solution of the dynamic recrystallization problem, still based on the average dislocation density, is presented by Davies, (1994). He introduced the development strain as a modifying parameter in Eq. (6.55) and assumed that hardening is controlled by two mechanisms. At low strains, the dislocation density is proportional to the imposed plastic MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
216 strain, while at higher strains the generation of dislocations is dependent on the current dislocation density. The annihilation of dislocation in Davies' model (1994) is related to the probability of dislocations meeting. In consequence, he obtained:
de
(6.58)
where c is the development strain and ps is the dislocation density for the current strain e. The constant A\ is determined by the first term in Eq. (6.52), and A2 and A-^ are evaluated from experimental data. The constant A^ is temperature dependent according to the Arrhenius law. Eq. (6.58) shows that for larger values of the development strain c, the accumulation of stored energy is sufficient to trigger recrystallization. If the development strain is low or zero, recrystallization is not possible, and recovery is a dominant softening mechanism. Eq. (6.58) is solved numerically. To obtain the solution, Davies (1994) replaces the strain e by ih, where / represents integer numbers and h is an iteration step. Assuming that low strain behavior is negligible when compared with the overall trend yields a finite difference solution for the instantaneous dislocation density as:
Figure 6.35 Distribution of the recrystallized volume fraction after first stage of compression, strain 0.25
p[(/ + \)h] = p[ih]+ AM^hl^ - 4 P [ ( ' - k)h]
(6.59)
r, mm
with k representing the development strain (kh = c). The critical factors in Eq. (6.59) are A2, A3 and c. The parameters A2 and A3 determine the steady state solution. The equilibrium population of dislocations, representing a balance between generation and annihilation of dislocations, is equal to A^^. Changes of A2 and c affect the stability of this equilibrium. Thus, for ^42^ < e'^ stable overdamping is observed, while for e'* < A2C < 0.57C, a stable overdamped solution, oscillatory in nature, is found. For A2C > O.Sn, unstable, periodic solutions are observed. Thus, within the limit 0 < A2C < 0.5n, a range of dynamic microstructural behavior may be described by the single Eq. (6.59). In consequence, this model has the potential to predict stress-strain curves under a wide range of test conditions. 6.4.5
Model based on the volume distribution of dislocations
To simulate complex microstructural phenomena, the dislocation density cannot be treated as an average value. Rather, the entire spectrum of the dislocation densities is to be considered. To allow this, the distribution fimction G{p,t), suggested by Sandstrom and Lagneborg MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
217 (1975a, 1975b), and defined as a volume fraction with a dislocation density between p and p•^•dp, is introduced. As a consequence, the equation, which describes the evolution of the dislocation populations and accounts for recrystallization, is:
dt
^
(6.60)
is)-g{s)-^mTpG{pj)
In Eq. (6.60), ^(A^) represents athermal storage (hardening), Ae is a strain increment, g{s) is the thermally activated softening (recovery) and r=//Z>^/2. This equation is solved, for each interval of dislocation density, together with equations describing the kinetics of recrystallization and grain growth (see Table 6.29). The fraction of migrating grain boundary, y in Eq. (6.60), is controlled by the nucleation rate at the beginning of recrystallization and by grain impingement in the final stages. This leads to the assumption that y is qualitatively controlled by the term X{l-X). Pietrzyk et al. (1995b) and Pietrzyk and Kuziak, (1995), give possible equations that describe the mobile fraction of the grain boundary y.
Table 6.29 Cycles of the simulation performed at each time step of the solution No process variables direction condition ref Sandstrom and 1 hardenAAP ^r-^Lagneborg, ^>0 ing 1975a, 1975b 2
recovery
Ap, p
3
recrystallization
4
grain refinement
D
grain growth
D
5
G, X, p
always
< P>
P^ Per
Sandstrom and Lagneborg, 1975a, 1975b Estrin and Mecking, 1984 Sandstrom and Lagneborg, 1975a, 1975b Sandstrom and
P> Prr
^
^^'^
always
T
U
Lagneborg, 1975a, 1975b Sandstrom and Lagneborg, 1975a, 1975b
equation dp _ s dt ~ hi
dt dp
'IMtp^
••-k^p
d£
^ - r - = -^rmG,iPi dt D ,r^ "^
dt
dt — dP
rncjg
dt'
D
All formulae used in the present volume distribution model are given in Tables 6.29 and 6.30. The following notation is used in these tables: b is the Burgers vector, D is the austenite grain size, d^ is the dislocation cell size, G is the volume distribution of dislocation MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
218 density, / is the dislocation mean free path, Q^ is the activation energy for grain boundary mobility, Q^ is the activation energy for recovery, Q^ is the activation energy for selfdiffusion, t is the time, X is the recrystallized volume fraction, Z is the Zener-HoUomon parameter, £• is the strain, e is the strain rate, y is the fraction of subgrain boundary that is migrating, /i is the shear modulus, p is the dislocation density, p^r is the critical dislocation density for nucleation, a^ is the grain boundary energy, and x is the energy per unit length of dislocation.
Table 6.30 Equations in the volume distribution model variable ref cell size (freepath)
Roberts and Ahlblom, 1978
equation ^^^ ^
^ ^ 2^
mobile fraction of boundary
Pietrzyk and Kuziak, 1995
_N / y>^f. yi P r =[l-exp(-^)](l-X)^^^^^
number of new grains per one old grain
Sandstrom and Lagneborg, 1975a, 1975b
^
critical dislocation density
Roberts and Ahlblom, 1978
80-^ Pcr-—r
{D^ ^sj
The differential equations describing the evolution of dislocation populations, kinetics of recrystallization and grain growth are solved in parallel with the simulation of the forming process. Due to the complexity of the equations, only numerical solutions are possible. A detailed description of the numerical solution of partial differential equations in Tables 6.29 and 6.30 is given by Pietrzyk, (1994). The approach is based on the division of the whole spectrum of dislocation densities into a number of intervals measuring Apo • Schematic illustration of the discretization of the distribution function is presented in Figure 6.36. Since all intervals Apo are equal, the volume fraction with the dislocation density between p, and Py + Apo, which is originally given as G(py,/)Apo, will be further referred to as G,. As a n
consequence, the condition ^ G , =1, where n is the number of intervals of dislocation densities, is always met during the simulation. Internal variables such as the grain size and the recrystallized volume fraction are given separately for each interval. Moreover, the average dislocation density in the interval is prescribed. The arrays !>(«), Ap(«) and G ( « ) , where n is the number of the intervals, are introduced into the program. The process of deformation is divided into time steps A/ and five cycles of simulation are performed for each step. The process represented by the cycle, the variable which is involved, the direction of the simulation MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
2^ (towards increasing or decreasing dislocation densities), the condition for the cycle to be performed and the equation describing the process are given in Table 6.29. At the beginning of the deformation of the fully recrystallized material, the dislocation density in the whole volume is within the first interval (with the lowest dislocation density). The distribution function is unity for this interval (Gi = 1) and zero for all remaining intervals. Hardening increases the level of dislocation densities in the interval considered by Ap^ and, eventually, moves the distributionftinctiontowards the right. Further, recovery decreases the level of dislocation densities by Ap^ and, eventually, moves the distribution function towards the lefl. Both of these cycles may eventually shift the volume fraction G, to the next (hardening) or previous (recovery) interval. If such a situation takes place during time step Ar in an arbitrary i-th interval, the new values of variables for hardening are calculated from: M+i - — T ; — — ^
^i+i = G,+i + G,
Ap,,, = Ap,.,G,,,+(AA+A/>,-Apo)G, Ap,=OG,^i=Q^i+G,
^^^^^
G,=0
In Eq. (6.61), Ap, represents the level of dislocation density in the /'^ interval. In order to avoid repeating the hardening cycle for the same fraction of the material in one time step, simulation of this cycle is performed towards the decreasing dislocation densities. By an analogy for the recovery cycle, the equations, concerning the (/ -1)*^ interval, when the decrease of dislocation density due to recovery in the time step A/ in the i^^ interval exceeds the level Ap,, are written:
G,_i+G, Ap,., = M-,G,_,^[Apo-(Ap,^Ap,)]G, G,_i +G, Ap,=OQ,i=G,,j+G,
^^^2^
G,=0
In order to avoid repeating the recovery cycle for the same fraction of the material in one time step, simulation of this cycle is performed towards the increasing dislocation densities. The recrystallization cycle is performed on all intervals above the critical dislocation density for nucleation. The recrystallized volume fraction AX/ in the time interval A^ is calculated from the equation in row 3 in Table 6.29, written in afinitedifference form:
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
220 bX.^^mTpM
(6.63)
This volume fraction is subtracted from G, and appears as fresh material with the lowest dislocation density in the first interval. The following substitutions follow:
Gi + AA , Changes of grain size in each time step are simulated, as well. Grain refinement and grain growth calculations are performed for all intervals of dislocation density using equations in rows 4 and 5 in Table 6.29, accounting for the local distribution of grain size. The main difficulty in the application of the dislocation density model to the simulation of industrial forming processes is connected to the evaluation of the material parameters. It is assumed that these parameters can be determined by fitting the results of the finite-element calculations to the measurements of stress-strain curves and kinetics of recrystallization in typical plastometric tests. Since all of these constants have physical meanings and their dependence on the temperature is known, the values can easily be extrapolated to other deformation conditions. The inverse technique described in Chapter 8 is used here, with the objective function during optimization being defined as the sum of the squares of the differences between the measured and calculated values of the parameters: T — I T
\
"•
I
X
—
X
»
(6.65) V /=1 V ^mi
J
where ac and am are the calculated and measured flow stress, Xc and Xn, are the calculated and measured fractional softening, / is the number of sampling points in the flow stress measurements, and k is the number of sampling points in the fractional softening measurements. Different materials behave differently and separate tests should be performed for each new chemical composition. Typical results of the validation of the model for selected steel grades are presented below. 6.4.6
Application to carbon-manganese steels
The tests available for the inverse analysis for carbon-manganese steels included the measurements of the fractional softening by Hodgson et al. (1990) and the stress-strain curves determined by Laasraoui and Jonas (1991). A simplified model based on the average dislocation density (Davies, 1994) was validated first, using stress-strain data only. The inverse analysis, based on the flow stress measurements, was applied to evaluate the constants in this model. The objective function was limited to the load error term, as shown in Chapter 8. Comparison of the stress-strain curves, measured by Laasraoui and Jonas (1991) and calculated using the simplified average dislocation density model, is presented in Figure 6.37. Reasonably good agreement was obtained. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
221
Pi-2
Pi-1 Pi Pi+1 Pl+2 Pi+3 Pi+4 dislocation density
Figure 6.36 Schematic illustration of the volume distribution function, showing nomenclature used in the text
1 0.0 0.1 0.2
\ 0.3
\ 1 0.4 0.5 Strain
r 0.6 0.7
0.8
Figure 6.37 Flow curves measured (filled points) and calculated by the average dislocation model (open points)
The complete model, based on the dislocation distribution function, is to be used when microstructural parameters are to be determined. Validation of this model is based on both softening data and the stress-strain curves. In all calculations, the austenite grain size prior to deformation was assumed to be 40 jam. Several material constants in the dislocation distribution model are to be determined. They include the dislocation cell size coefficients K^ and q, the mobility of recovery term MQ or ^2» the grain boundary mobility coefficient m^, the number of recrystaUized grains per old grain N, the activation energies for recrystallization Q^ and self-diffusion Qs, the coefficients describing the mobilefi-actionof the subgrain boundary qi and ^2> the shear modulus //, the critical dislocation density for nucleation of recrystallization p^, the grain boundary energy a^, the coefficient a in Eq. (6.44) and the Burgers vector b. The initial values of these constants were taken from the literature and they are given by Pietrzyk, (1994). Frost and Ashby, (1982) give the temperature dependence of the shear modulus. Some of the material's parameters are known with good accuracy, and are not considered to be unknowns. Eight constants (Kd, q, /wo, Mo, Qm, QM or Qs, q\ and a) are introduced in the optimization and become the varying parameters in the inverse technique. The objective function, defined by Eq. (6.67), is very complex within the wider range of unknowns. Because of this, a search was performed in the vicinity of the values of the constants, published in the literature. Two versions of the recovery term, one dependent on p (the equation by Estrin and Mecking, 1984, in Table 6.29) and the second, dependent on f? (the equation by Sandstrom and Lagneborg, 1975a, in Table 6.29) were considered. It was observed that the approach based MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
222 on Sandstrom and Lagneborg's equation (1975a) with QM = 400 kJ/mole and Mo = 5.7 x \d^ m2(Ns)-l (Roberts and Ahlblom, 1978) underestimates the recovery for low temperatures. Therefore, only the recovery term described by Estrin and Mecking's equation (1984) is used in further analysis. For the sake of clarity, the following nomenclature is used in the text below: SRX is static recrystallization, SRV is static recovery, DRV is dynamic recovery, and RX is dynamic recrystallization. The inverse technique, applied to determine the material constants using the stress-strain curves and softening curves, yielded the values shown in Table 6.31. The minimum in the error function was not clearly defined and the search procedure was slow. In order to explain the reason for these problems, optimization was also tried using the stress-strain curves and the softening curves, separately. The latter gave the apparent activation energy Qs equal to 24 kJ/mole for SRX and 14 kJ/mole for the stress-strain curves. Although the error was now below 5%, recrystallization was underestimated during the deformation (see Figure 2 in Pietrzyk et al., 1995b). Recovery became the dominant factor competing with hardening. Thus, this approach failed to model SRX qualitatively during deformation.
Table 6.31 variable units value
K, m/s 0.26 10-3
k. 34
Qs kJ/mole 20
/WQ
m'(Ns)-' 1.4 105
Q. kJ/mole 340
^1
q
-
-
1.75
0.1
a 1.23
The first approach, which consisted of performing the optimization on all the available experimental results, led to an error norm of 13% and to the material constants, shown in Table 6.31. When these constants were used in the calculations, the sensitivity of static recrystallization to strain agreed reasonably well with experimental data, shown in Figure 6.38a for a strain rate of 0.2 s'\ Sensitivity of SRX to the temperature, presented in Figure 6.38b, shows that at higher temperatures, recrystallization is predicted to be faster than measured. This is believed to be due to the high value of activation energy of grain boundary mobility Q^, which is reported to be 360 kJ/mole (Roberts and Ahlblom, 1978). The stress-strain curves are qualitatively in agreement with the experiments (Figure 6.39). Recovery was found to be an important component of hardening, as shown in Figure 6.40. The plots presented were obtained by disconnecting various parts of the model during calculations. Thus, the curve obtained with the recrystallization turned off shows that deformation leads to equilibrium between hardening and recovery, and that a plateau is observed for larger strains. Removing the recovery term from the model involves an increase in the rate of hardening and, in consequence, triggers dynamic recrystallization at a smaller strain. Characteristic oscillations are observed on the calculated stress-strain curve when a lack of recovery is assumed (Figure 6.40). A comparison of the measured and calculated stress-strain curves for the strain rate of 0.2 s'^ is presented in Figure 6.39a. Analysis of these resuhs shows that good agreement between measurements and calculations is obtained for higher temperatures of deformation. Discrepancies are large at 800°C, probably due to the change of activation energy for selfMA THEMA TfCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
223^
diffusion with decreasing temperatures. Constant value of this energy was assumed in the calculations. The recrystallization during slow deformatipn is calculated reasonably well.
0.0
1.0 lg(time)
2.0
-1.5 -1.0
-0.5
1 0.0 0.5 lg(time)
1 1.0
\ 1.5
1 2.0
Figure 6.38 Measured (filled points) and calculated (open points) fractional softening for (a) various strains and (b) various temperatures
strain n \ \ i \ \ r 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Strain
0.8
1 1 0.0 0.1 0.2
\ 0.3
r 0.4 0.5 Strain
0.6
0.7
0.8
Figure 6.39 Measured (filled points) and calculated (open points) stress-strain curves for the (a) strain rate of 0.2 s (b) and for 2.0 s and for various temperatures MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
,
224
The agreement between the measurements and the calculations, however, is not as good for the faster tests, seen in Figure 6.39b where the resuhs for the strain rate of 2 s are presented. Again, the discrepancies are larger at lower temperatures. Evidently, further work must be done to improve the accuracy of the model. On the other hand, however, the model's ability to simulate complex conditions of deformation, involving varying strain rate or/and temperature, is an important advantage. The dislocation distribution model explains numerous microstructural phenomena, observed experimentally. Calculations performed under isothermal conditions show good correlation with published experimental data, demonstrated in Figure 6.41, which shows the influence of the strain and strain rate on the kinetics of recrystallization. The plots agree well with the observation that the sensitivity of the kinetics of recrystallization on strain diminishes for large strains. Increasing the strain rate causes loss of strain sensitivity at larger strains. 1.0
J0OOO-O-O-
O - O - O - <S
5^i
0.9
1 W
I °^ temperature 1000°C strain rate 0.2 s~^
V)
^
calculattons (full model)|
-A— 0.0
I
0.1
0.2
\
\
i
T ^ ^* am:n -%£ -
U
0.4
\
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 strain
I
0.8
Figure 6.40 Measured stress-strain curves compared with calculations for various parts of the model being active
^ c;
A
Za
0.3 H
Strain rate:
0.2 -1.0
-0.5
—1 r~ 0.0 0.5 In (time)
0.4 n7
n
calculations, no DRX \
* ^
Iu 0.5
calculations, no DRV I
/
:fi 0.6 H
measurements
-^—
r/
o
'-^ J - 0 . 2 s-1
-2.0 s-1 —1 1.0 1.5
Figure 6.41 Kinetics of recrystallization calculated for various strains and strain rates, temperature lOOO^C
This phenomenon is demonstrated even better in Figure 6.42, where a relation between the time for 50% recrystallization and the strain for various strain rates and temperatures is given. The plots coincide qualitatively with the well-known relation of /Q 5 versus the strain, which, in the logarithmic scale, is presented in the form of two straight lines (see for example Sellars, 1990). One line for lower strains is inclined and the inclination angle determines the strain sensitivity of ^0.5 The second line, for larger strains, is parallel to the horizontal axis and expresses the insensitivity of /0.5 to the strain. The transition point between these two lines is reported to move towards larger strains with increasing strain rates. Plots in Figure 6.42 give a similar description of this phenomenon, except that the relations in Figure 6.42 are continuous, as they are in a real material. These results, as well as additional numerical experiments MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
225 performed by Pietrzyk (1994), Pietrzyk et al. (1995b), Pietrzyk (1996), confirmed the predictive ability of the internal variable model based, on the dislocation density distribution function, as far as the simulation of the flow stress and various complex microstructural phenomena is considered.
a)
b) strain rate:
-2.5
-2.0
n -1.5
I I -1.0 -0.5 In(straln)
1 0.0
r 0.5
1.0
-2.5
-2.0
n -1.5
1 1 -1.0 -0.5 In(strain)
1 0.0
1 0.5
I 1.0
Figure 6.42 Time for 50% recrystallization calculated by the internal variable model for various strain rates (a) and temperatures (b)
6.5
CASE STUDIES - INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS
An application of the model, coupling the finite-element method of Chapter 5 with the conventional microstructure evolution equations of Section 6.1, to the simulation of metal flow, heat transfer and microstructure evolution during hot rolling of steel plates and strips is described in this section. 6.5.1
Plate rolling
Pietrzyk and Lenard (1991a) presented an application of the finite-element method to the modeling of thermal and mechanical phenomena in the plate rolling processes. In this section the finite-element program described in Chapter 5, combined with the microstructure evolution model of Hodgson (1993a), is applied to the simulation of metal flow, heat transfer and microstructural evolution during the rolling of niobium steel plates in a two-stand reverse mill. The parameters of the mill are as follows: the work roll diameter is 900 mm, the back-up roll diameter is 1900 mm, and the roll length is 3800 mm. The steel contains 0.16%C, 1.37%Mn, 0.28%Si, 0.014%P, 0.025%S, 0.08%Cr, 0.07%Ni, 0.15%Cu, 0.025%Nb, 0.026%A1 and 0.0052%N. The flow stress is described by the hyperbolic sine equation, Eq. (3.24), with the coefficients suggested for low niobium steels, in Chapter 6.3. Typical rolling MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
226 parameters, together with the results of calculations and measurements, are presented in Table 6.32, where R stands for the roughing passes and F for the finishing passes. Analysis of the results shows that discrepancies between the measurements and calculations appear in some of the passes. The roll force was measured by a standard load gauge and the temperatures were measured by pyrometers used in the control system during production. The reliability of these measurements is not known.
Table.6.32 Rolling parameters (schedule I), plate width 2100 mm pass thickness reduc- tempera- tempera- roll force torque force no. tion ture, X nire, X measured predicted predicted mm measured predicted kN/mm kN/mm Nm/mm 0 225.0 1230 Rl 189.0 807 7.5 0.16 1192 1199 6.1 R2 143.0 12.4 1200 0.24 1183 1197 7.7 R3 115.0 653 0.20 1173 9.3 1192 7.9 R4 112.0 130 0.03 1163 1.9 2.0 1187 R5 75.7 15.7 1052 0.32 1146 1178 13.5 R6 43.5 20.4 1170 0.43 1130 1166 20.8 R7 21.6 0.50 22.4 998 1105 1142 21.8 Fl 14.2 0.34 1041 354 1074 13.5 12.8 F2 12.2 0.14 73 5.9 1003 1003 7.2 F3 9.6 0.21 80 962 7.2 940 9.2 F4 7.7 907 0.20 12.4 165 877 9.4 F5 6.5 0.16 852 110 11.8 814 9.7
grain size jim
interpass time s
300 293 138 127 142 85 49 30 17 18 19 19 19
5 9 5 9 7 8 18 12 13 14 15
-
The rolling schedule presented in Table 6.32 is a typical one, taken from the log books of the control system. Analysis of the technological parameters in Table 6.32 shows, however, several inconsistencies. The reductions in passes R4 and F2 are smaller than in the remaining passes. As a consequence, the microstructure development was disturbed at some stages of the draft schedule. The calculated austenite grain size during rolling is plotted as a function of the temperature in Figure 6.43. The unusual increase of grain size is observed in pass R4. Figure 6.44 shows the predicted times for 5% recrystallization, 95% recrystallization and 5% precipitation compared with the interpass time. Since fiill recrystallization was predicted in all roughing passes, only five finishing passes are presented in Figure 6.44. Note that the pass number increases (from Fl to F5) with decreasing temperatures. Due to large differences between the times, a logarithmic time scale is used. Analysis of the plots in Figure 6.44 shows partial recrystallization after pass F2, which is stopped by the precipitation in pass F3. An analysis is performed investigating the possibility of increasing the solute drag effect on the retardation of recrystallization. This should lead to precipitation appearing in the last pass only. Since the effect of rough rolling on the microstructure during the finishing stages is negligible, only the latter were investigated. A distribution of reductions giving reasonably uniform distribution of forces was assumed first (Table 6.33). The plots of the recrystallization and precipitation times for these parameters are shown in Figure 6.45. An increase of the MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
^
227
precipitation time is observed in this case and the solute drag effect is responsible for the retardation in pass F3. The recrystallization is stopped by precipitates in pass F4. 200-|
6n
schedule I
180 J 160-] 140
120 H 100
Ji
80-1
60-1 20 0 700
800
900 1000 temperature, °C
1100
1200
4 2
oH 5% recrystallization
-jAj—
95% recrystallization I
-(3""
5% precipitation
-4-4
•§•
Interpass tlnr^e
1 800
850
\
n
900 950 1000 temperature, o c
schedule I
"B"
6
—0—
0
A £1
Figure 6.43 Changes of austenite grain size during rolling of niobium steel plate in a two-stand reverse mill
-2
r
-2H ( ^
r^
40
I
r 1050 110
Figure 6.45 Calculated recrystallization and precipitation times during rolling of niobium steel plate in the finishing stand (schedule II)
95% recrystallization 5% precipitation
+I 800
5% recrystallization
850
interpasstime
900 950 1000 temperature.oC
"~1 1050
1 1100
Figure 6.44 Calculated recrystallization and precipitation times during rolling of niobium steel plate in the finishing stand (schedule I)
Further analysis assumed an increase of the entry temperature to the finishing stand and an increase of the reductions in passes Fl and F2. The results presented in Table 6.34 and in Figure 6.46 show a further increase of precipitation time at the primary stages of rolling. However, since the plate is thinner in passes F3 and F4, the temperature drops there are larger. Lower temperatures accelerate the precipitation. The next rolling schedule is designed to prevent the temperature drop in the finishing passes. The rolling velocity is increased by 20%, leading to shorter interpass times. The resulting parameters are given in Table 6.35 and the recrystallization and precipitation times are plotted in Figure 6.47. The precipitation time in pass F4 is longer than in the previous schedules and the recrystallization is stopped by precipitates in the last pass.
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
228 Table.6.33 Rolling parameters, schedule II pass no. thickness reduction temperature, roll force kN/mm mm Fl 10.4 1074 0.27 16.0 F2 9.9 1010 0.24 12.2 F3 9.6 944 10.1 0.21 F4 7.7 874 12.1 0.20 6.5 F5 805 11.9 0.16
roll torque interpass time s Nm/mm 12 245 13 182 14 137 15 140 101 -
Table.6.34 Rolling parameters, schedule III pass no. thickness reduction temperature. roll force mm kN/mm Fl 13.8 0.36 1088 13.4 F2 9.7 0.30 1021 11.5 F3 8.3 0.14 945 6.0 F4 7.3 0.12 871 6.7 F5 6.5 0.11 803 7.8
roll torque interpass time s Nm/mm 12 366 13 221 14 57 15 50 48 -
2-\
schedule IV
-2H
5% recrystallizati 95% recrystallization
95% recrystallization|
-4H
h-Q-
800
h-B
5% precipitation
interpass time 1 1 850 900 950 1000 temperature, o c
—I 1050 110
Figure 6.46 Calculated recrystallization and precipitation times during rolling of niobium steel plate in the finishing stand (schedule EI)
800
5% precipitation
interpass time n I I — —\ 850 900 950 1000 1050 temperature oc
1 1100
Figure 6.47 Calculated recrystallization and precipitation times during rolling of niobium steel plate in the finishing stand (schedule IV)
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
229 The results presented in Figures 6.44-6.47 and in Tables 6.32-6.35 show the ability of the finite-element program to simulate the microstructure evolution in the industrial type plate mills. The program allows for the consideration of a number of various rolling schedules and the investigation of the influence of various parameters on microstructure evolution.
Table 6.35 Rolling parameters, schedule IV pass no. thickness reduction temperature, roll force mm kN/mm Fl 0.36 13.8 13.4 1088 F2 0.30 9.7 11.2 1034 F3 8.3 0.14 5.7 970 F4 7.3 0.12 905 5.9 F5 6.5 0.11 6.9 842
6.5.2
roll torque interpass time Nm/mm s 9 366 10 215 11 54 12 43 42
Hot strip rolling
The models have been applied to the simulation of hot strip rolling processes. A hot strip mill, consisting of five roughing stands and seven finishing stands, is considered. Preliminary results obtained fi-om the thermal-mechanical model have been presented in Chapter 5, in Figures 5.4, 5.5 and Table 5.3. The present section contains further results, obtained afl;er the incorporation of the microstructure evolution equations into the finite-element program. The emphasis is put on the possibility of the application of the fiill model to the evaluation of relations between process parameters and product properties. The production of pre-determined properties of the final product is usually complicated and requu-es the selection of numerous technological parameters. The relationships between the product's properties and process parameters are complex, and it is often difficult to predict the changes to be introduced in the rolling schedule to achieve the required goal. Application of the simulation programs, used off'-line, eases this procedure. The simplest way of using the models in computer aided technology is to perform simulations and sensitivity studies for various process parameters and compare the results. Numerous examples of these simulations for hot strip rolling are presented by Pietrzyk and Lenard, (1993). Typical resuhs, showing the predictions of austenite and ferrite grain sizes for various velocities in the last stand are demonstrated in Figure 6.48. The results were obtained during rolling of 2 mm thick carbon-manganese steel strips firom a slab, measuring 170x830x5500 mm. The models of Sellars and Whiteman (1979) and Sellars (1990) for the austenite microstructure evolution, and Sellars and Beynon (1993) for the ferrite grain size were used in the calculations, presented in Figure 6.48, The rolling velocity in the last stand, representing the velocity of the whole finishing train, is an independent variable in the plot. Increasing the velocity yields coarser austenite and ferrite grains, in contradiction with the usual opinions. Two opposite tendencies cause the apparent contradiction. Shorter time intervals between the passes leave less time for grain growth. This phenomenon is overtaken by the temperature increase caused by faster rolling, leading to larger grains after recrystallization and to faster MCROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
230
grain growth. A decrease of the grain size with increasing rolling velocity is obtained, when the entry temperature is changed corresponding to the rolling velocity, such that a constant finishing temperature is maintained. An example, shown in Figure 6.48, as well as the data presented by Pietrzyk and cooling rate 4° C/s Lenard (1993), show that the influence of 25 the process parameters on the final microstructure and mechanical properties cannot be analyzed separately for each parameter. 20 H Instead, the complex influence of all parameters should be investigated. The model •^ 15 H therefore, has been applied to determine the sensitivities of the product's microstructure a> 10 and mechanical properties to such process austenite (surface) parameters as stock temperature, rolling SH velocity, rolling schedule and interpass austenite (center) time between the roughing and finishing ferrite (center) passes (Pietrzyk et al., 1998). I \ I Development of the applications of 5 6 7 rolling velocity, m/s computer techniques to the optimization of technological processes involves new nuFigure 6.48 Austenite and ferrite grain size merical methods. Beyond the commonly vs. rolling velocity for the hot strip mill used finite difference and finite-element methods, sensitivity analyses will have to be included in the simulations involving optimization of processes (see Kleiber and Kowalczyk, 1995). Constitutive parameters or thermal properties are the usual independent variables in the sensitivity analysis. Pietrzyk et al., (1998) considered using the technological parameters in this role. Analytical calculations of derivatives with respect to these variables are not possible and the sensitivities were determined by numerical differentiation. Application of the sensitivity studies can be twofold. They can be used in the on-line control systems for the prediction of changes of the process parameters, introduced to obtain the necessary changes of output parameters. In hot strip rolling processes only the finishing temperature is a controllable output parameter, which is measured during the process. Since they cannot be measured on-line, microstructure or properties cannot be controlled directly, on-line. Therefore, only thefinishingtemperature is considered in the first part of the analysis. The second application of the sensitivity study is in off-line control, when the changes in the rolling technology are introduced on the basis of measurements in previous runs and tests of the final products. The output parameters considered in this part of the analysis include the austenite grain size, the ferrite grain size and the tensile strength. The following partial derivatives are determined in the first part of analysis: 30
ST^ oTf oTj- dP
cD
dP
MA THEMA TJCAL ANP PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOTROLLEP PROPUCTS
(6.66)
231 where To is the stock temperature, 7/is the finishing temperature, tp is the interpass time between roughing and finishing, D is the final austenite grain size and v? is the exit velocity. The following partial derivatives are determined in the second part of sensitivity analysis:
where cjy is the lower yield stress Gp is the tensile strength and Da is the ferrite grain size. The calculations were performed for rolling a 2 mm thick C-Mn steel strip from a slab, measuring 175x1250x5500 mm. The chemical composition of the steel is given in Table 6.36. Table 6.36 The chemical composition of the steel, weight% C Mn Si P 0.09 0.66 0.02 0.013
Cr 0.03
Cu 0.04
Al 0.039
N 0.005
The rolling process was performed in 12 passes, consisting of five roughing passes with the entry thickness in each pass given as 175 -> 134 -> 90 ^ 60 -> 48 -> 37 mm, followed by seven finishing passes, with the thickness in each pass: 37.0 -^ 21.0 -^ 10.9 -> 6.58 -> 4.15 ^ 2.91-^ 2.34-> 2.02 mm. The following microstructure evolution models were used: • • • •
Sellars and Whiteman, (1979) and Sellars, (1990) for the austenite microstructure evolution; Sellars and Beynon, (1993) for the ferrite grain size; and Hodgson and Gibbs, (1992) for the mechanical properties at room temperature.
The character of the relationships between output parameters (finishing temperature, microstructural parameters, mechanical properties in room temperature) and process technological parameters (entry temperature, rolling velocity, interpass time between roughing and finishing) can be easily demonstrated in the form of three-dimensional graphs, shown in Figures 6.49 and 6.50. Figure 6.49 shows the dependence of the finishing temperature on the entry temperature, and the rolling velocity, represented by the roll angular velocity in the last stand, in rpm, and the interpass time. As expected, the model predicts that the finishing temperature decreases with decreasing entry temperature, decreasing velocity and increasing interpass time. The relationships obtained for the austenite grain size are shown in Figure 6.50. Finer microstructure is predicted for lower entry temperatures, lower rolling velocities and longer interpass times. Figures 6.49 and 6.50 show that the relationships are monotonous and the optimum conditions of the process are determined by the constraints of the optimization, such as limiting angles of bite, rolling loads, etc.
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
232
intfirpass time
entry temperature 1240^0
Figure 6.49 Three-dimensional graphs showing temperature dependence on the process technological parameters
interpass time 0
entry temperature 1240^0
Figure 6.50 Three-dimensional graphs showing austenite grain size dependence on the process technological parameters
Three-dimensional plots showing the dependence of the ferrite grain size and the lower yield stress on process parameters are shown in Figures 6.51 and 6.52. These relationships are monotonous as well, and the optimum conditions are determined by other constraints imposed on the optimization. Note that the model of the yield stress neglects the fact that greater austenite grains lead to an increase of pearlite content in the steel and to the formation of acicular ferrite, which may further increase the yield stress. This phenomenon is not accounted for in the present model. Figures 6.53 and 6.54 show the sensitivities of the finishing temperature and the austenite grain size with respect to the rolling velocity and entry temperatures, respectively. These relationships can be approximated and used for the calculations of partial derivatives of selected output parameters with respect to technological parameters. Beyond the entry temperature, the interpass time and the rolling velocity, the rolling schedule is an additional parameter, which can be used to control the microstructure and mechanical properties of the final product. The preceding results were obtained for the rolling schedule given at the previous page.
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
233 interpass time 0 ^
^
interpass time 0
entry temperature 1240^0 entry temperature 1240, ^C
> ^ Figure 6.51 Three-dimensional graphs showing ferrite grain size dependence on the process technological parameters
Figure 6.52 Three-dimensional graphs showing yield stress dependence on the process technological parameters
0.35 20.5 4-0.30
I 0.05 austenite grain size -| 6.5
1 \ 1 7.0 7.5 8.0 rolling velocity, m^
r 8.5
9.0
Figure 6.53 Finishing temperature and austenite grain size sensitivity to the entry temperature as a function of the velocity
1200
finishing temperalurej 1 1 r 1230 1260 1290 1320 tennperatura wsadu, °C
Figure 6.54 Finishing temperature and aus tenite grain size sensitivity to the velocity as a function of the entry temperature
MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
234
^
The possibility of using the rolling schedule as an optimization parameter is described briefly below. Since the final properties of the product are determined in the finishing train, only this phase is investigated. The representation of the rolling schedule for seven stands by one variable is possible only if the reductions in subsequent passes are not treated individually. Instead, a distribution function is introduced. For linear distribution of reductions in subsequent passes, the functions plotted in Figure 6.55 are obtained. Assuming further that reductions in all passes are equal, corresponding to the horizontal line in Figure 6.55, one obtains: £,=1-7^-
for
/ = 1,
,7
(6.68)
In Eq. (6.68), ho is the thickness at the entry to the finishing train, hj is the final thickness at the exit from the 7* stand and f, represents the reduction in the /* pass. The assumption of linear distribution of reductions allows the use of one coefficient to describe the particular rolling schedule. This coefficient is called the reduction coefficient y. The reduction in the i^ pass is calculated as f, = ^i - iy. In practical applications of this approach, each rolling schedule is represented by the reduction in the first pass ei, while the reduction coefficient ;^is calculated by solving the equation: 7
^Ul^-^^Hi-l)y]-h,=^0
(6.69)
Eq. (6.69) is solved numerically. When the reduction in the first pass eu is assumed to equal the average reduction sj, calculatedfi-omEq. (6.68), the relationship, Eq. (6.69), yields a reduction coefficient y= 0, showing that the reductions in all passes are equal. When si < Si, the relationship (6.69) yields negative values for the coefficient y, indicating that the reductions increase from pass to pass. Further, when £i > et, Eq. (6.69) yields positive values of the coefficient y, leading to reductions that decrease from pass to pass. The former situation is not possible in industrial practice, because of the limitations of the available motor power in the last finishing stands, where rolling velocities are high and the temperatures are low. Therefore, only those situations with positive values of the reduction coefficient y are considered here. Distributions of reductions in thefinishingpasses for various values of the coefficient /are shown in Figure 6.55a and the corresponding thickness of the strip in subsequent stands are presented in Figure 6.55b. The thick line in Figure 6.55b represents the rolling schedule, currently used in the strip mill. Notice that for all cases shown in Figure 6.55, the total reduction in the finishing train is the same, equal to 94.5%, corresponding to the entry thickness of 37 mm and the final thickness of 2.02 mm. Similar analysis can be performed assuming second order distribution of reductions.
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
235
reduction coefficient 7
—+-
—+— 00.020'
reduction coefficient
A £\ A
0.076
--^-&--•---A--
0.096
[- -A- - 0.096
I m.
1
'
0.038
V
1
0
-B-•-
J%
0.020
0.056
1
1
1
3 4 5 pass number
6
7
1 2
1
1
3 4 5 pass number
0.038 0.056 0.076
r 6
Figure 6.55 Distribution of reductions and strip thickness in finishing passes for various values of the coefficient y
Figure 6.56 shows the finishing temperature and the final austenite grain size as a 856 function of the reduction coefficient y. The austenite grain size decreases with decreasB ing 7, while the minimum finishing tem2 852 perature is obtained for y = 0.076. It can be E concluded that the reduction coefficient y 848-J c can be efficiently used as a single optimizaz tion parameter. Sensitivities of the output vt c 844 H parameters with respect to this coefficient can be calculated and used in on-line control 840 of the process. Application of the coefficient 1 1 1 ^-TT 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 y is limited in the case of rolling mills, reduction coefficient 7 which have finishing trains equipped in various types of stands, in particular when Figure 6.56 Influence of distribution of rethey differ significantly in the nominal ductions represented by the coefficient ;^on power of motors. Such situation, however, the finishing temperature and on the may not allow monotonous distribution of austenite grain size, for the remaining reductions, which is a basic assumption of parameters constant the current approach. Some of the stands with more powerful motors can accommodate reductions much larger than the remaining stands. Imposing also a load coefficient for each stand as a constraint on MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE FINAL PRODUCT
236 the solution allows accounting for differences in nominal power of the motors. The load coefficient represents the rolling power to the motor nominal power ratio. As shown in the chapter, it is possible to predict the evolution of the microstructure of the hot rolled steel, quite accurately, using the models now available. The possibility of determining the properties of the rolled product, after it has cooled to room temperatures, is also possible. Further, using the models, it is possible to optimize the draft schedule with the aim of minimizing the grain sizes and maximizing the strength. Direct substantiation of the predictions of the models in industrial situations is difficult. Grain size measurements at individual stands are simply unavailable. In most hot strip mills, no temperature readings at each stands are taken. At most, the pyrometers are located at the entry to thefinishingtrain and at the coilers.
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
237
Chapter 71 Shape Rolling I A large group of rolling processes, involving three-dimensional metal forming operations is referred to as shape rolling. These processes can be divided into two groups. One is connected with the rolling of products with cross sections that are close to round or square. These processes are usually performed in series of passes, involving grooves such as round, oval, square, diamond, and octagonal. The second group includes rolling of various structural shapes: I-beams, channels, angles, rails, etc. These processes require carefiil design of each of the passes. Numerical modeling of metal flow and heat transfer in these processes is to be based on three-dimensional analysis. Numerous examples of the application of these models to the simulation of shape rolling processes have been published, see for example Huisman and Huetink, 1985; Pillinger et al., 1988; Mori and Osakada, 1989; and Bertrand-Corsini et al, 1989; it is understood that the list is far from complete. However, these solutions need very long computing times even on modern work stations. Simulation of the complete process, involving a large number of passes, would require such long computing times that efficient analysis of several variables and variations of the roll pass design becomes unfeasible. A new approach, that combines reasonable computing times with acceptable accuracy, is necessary.
7.1
GENERALIZED PLANE STRAIN APPROACH
Approximate methods to analyze the shape rolling process have been developed and applied in several instances (Kastner et al., 1981; Pietrzyk and Glowacki, 1981; Okon et al., 1987). These have been useful in predicting the rolling loads, the overall geometrical changes of deformed pieces and the qualitative modes of metal flow. They are also capable of determining, approximately, the optimum conditions for the shape rolling process. However, most of them have been based on the transformation of the required, arbitrary complex cross section into an equivalent rectangular shape, often using the constant cross-sectional area method. In consequence, one-dimensional models developed for the flat rolling processes have been directly applied to analyze shape rolling. These solutions gave realistic but very approximate results for load calculations. They were not capable of predicting of the temperature fields. Much better and more accurate solutions have been obtained when simplified finiteelement methods have been used. One of the most efficient approaches to the simulation of shape rolling processes is called the generalized plane strain method. This method can be applied to forming processes in which the metals experience a reasonably uniform deformation in one direction. The rolling and drawing of shapes, as well as stretch forging or rotary swaging, exhibit this feature. Due to its efficiency, combined with reasonable accuracy, the generalized plane strain approach has become a very popular method of simulating three-dimensional rolling processes.
238
_^
Among the first applications of this method, the work by Glowacki (1990) should be mentioned and is described below. Similar models have been published for rolling in three-roll grooves, by Komori, (1997) for rolling of tubes, by Yamada et al., (1990), and for rolling in oval and diamond grooves was examined by Xin et al, (1990). 7.1.1
Basic principles of the method
The main assumption of the method is that the two-dimensional finite-element solution is to be performed in the plane, perpendicular to the rolling direction. The process is divided into several subsequent steps, connected with subsequent locations of this plane in the deformation zone. It is assumed that the strains in the rolling direction are distributed uniformly across the sample. This assumption results in constant components of the strain and strain rate tensors in that direction, and in zero (or constant) components of the shear strain and shear strain rate, connected with that direction. In consequence, the plane of the cross section of the sample remains plane during the whole process. This cross section is analyzed using a nonsteady state, two-dimensional model, while keeping in mind that the whole process is threedimensional. The longitudinal strain in each time step is uniform at the cross section. This strain is often obtained from experiments, but such an approach does not allow the prediction of filling of the grooves. Therefore, in more advanced generalized plane strain solutions, the longitudinal strain is introduced as a variable in the optimization procedure. Some phenomena, like forward slip, coupled with the rolling direction, are calculated using existing models and are introduced in the finite-element model. The solution is performed using a mesh of elements in the plane perpendicular to the sample axis. In subsequent steps of the calculations the plane moves between the tools and is deformed. Schematic illustration of the method is presented in Figure 7.1. The tp part of the figure shows the mesh in a typical two-dimensional solution for the flat rolling process, while the lower part of the figure presents the plane with the mesh, moving through the roll gap, as is done in the generalized plane strain approach.
Figure 7.1 Schematic illustration of the finite-element mesh in the conventional twodimensional solution (top) and in the generalized plane strain solution (bottom) for rolling MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
232 Simulation of the metal flow in the two-dimensional domain is performed using a typical rigid-plastic fmite-element approach, as described in Chapter 5. The deforming body is assumed to obey the Levy-Mises flow rule, given by Eq. (5.2). The effective stress in Eq. (5.2) is taken to equal the yield stress, calculated from the strain hardening curve. Solutions for various material models are then possible, including those accounting for the influence of the strain rate, strain and temperature on the yield stress. The friction stress at the contact surface is usually modeled employing the friction factor model:
^ -
^
(7.1)
where m is the friction factor and a^ is the yield stress. Other friction models can also be used. The basic part of the solution is the optimization of the power functional given by Eq. (5.1). The major problems and difficulties in the application of the generalized plane strain method to the simulation of three-dimensional rolling processes are: • • • • •
prediction of the location of the neutral zone; accounting for the longitudinal component of the friction forces; prediction of the longitudinal strain; calculation of the rolling force; and imposing the incompressibility condition on the solution.
Constant volume constraint in the typical two-dimensional solutions is imposed using a Lagrange multiplier, A. This multiplier can also be used to predict the average stress (Pietrzyk and Lenard, 1991). This method does not work correctly for the generalized approach; therefore, in the further analysis in this chapter, X. in Eq. (5,1) is taken as a penalty coefficient. In order to prevent volume losses in the simulation, the constant penalty coefficient X is replaced by its varying value (Malinowski and Lenard, 1993): ^ =
EAt
(7.2) ^ ^
6(1-2v)
where E is the Young's modulus, v is the Poison's ratio and A/ is the time interval. Poison's ratio is close to 0.5, and in a practical solution it is assumed to be 0.499 for steel and 0.4999 for copper, a softer material. The thermal component of the model is based on thefinite-elementsolution of general heat conduction, Eq. (5.68), in the plane, perpendicular to the rolling direction. Pietrzyk and Lenard (1988) give details of this approach. The model also neglects the longitudinal heat conduction. Since during the very short times in the roll gap, the temperature gradients in this direction are small, this assumption does not introduce a significant error to the solution. One finite-element Lagrangian type mesh is used in both mechanical and thermal solutions. The model has the ability to simulate realistically the rolling processes, in particular rolling using 4-roll grooves where the differences in the elongation of various parts of the shape are negligible. However, for processes with less uniform elongation, like rolling in 2-roll grooves
SHAPE ROLLING
240 or stretch forging, the results of the calculations are still reasonably close to the practical observations. Glowacki et al. (1992) incorporated the equations describing the evolution of the microstructure of Chapter 6 into the generalized plane strain model. These equations are solved in each element at the cross section of the product, using the current values of the temperatures, strain rates and strains, as calculated by the model. In consequence, the distributions of all microstructural parameters at the cross section of rolled products are determined.
7.2
CASE STUDIES
Glowacki's model (1990, 1993), has been successfully applied to the simulation of the rolling of rails (Glowacki et al., 1995), of the rolling of eutectoid steel rods (Kuziak et al., 1996), of the rolling of vanadium steel rods (Glowacki et al., 1996) and of the rolling of steel rods covered with copper (Glowacki, 1997). A detailed description of the application to study rolling of vanadium steel rods, is presented in the next section. Because of the high rolling velocities which result in high strain rates, this process is of interest to researchers. The high velocities make the simulation particularly difficult. 7.2.1
Rolling of rods
The rod rolling process has stimulated many experiments and theoretical considerations related to the mechanisms of the restoration processes in deformed austenite. Many researchers advocate the possibility of the initiation of dynamic recrystallization during the final passes, taking place at fairly low temperatures (Hodgson, 1993a; Yue et al., 1995). The hypothesis is based on the accumulation of strains because of the short time intervals between consecutive passes. Despite the tremendous amount of experimental efforts directed at detailed understanding of dynamic and post-dynamic recrystallization mechanisms (see Sections 6.1.2 and 6.1.3), understanding of the role of these processes in microstructure development is still far from satisfactory. This is because knowledge of the material's response in the rod rolling process is mostly based on the results of laboratory simulations, conducted using hotdeformation simulators, in which the range of deformation parameters is very limited. This especially pertains to the very high strain rate during the finishing passes, up to 1000 s"\ a level which is not attained by laboratory testing equipment. Moreover, severe changes of deformation parameters at the cross-section of a rod in the roll bite are expected to occur. To accommodate these facts, a theoretical analysis of the rod rolling process is based on an extrapolation of material behavior during laboratory experiments to the range of drastically changing processing conditions in industry. Mathematical modeling of rod rolling processes is not well developed, since it requires a great deal of specialist knowledge and is an interdisciplinary activity. Thermomechanical models of rod rolling are complicated. They require three-dimensional solutions, which, because of long computing times, do not allow for the efficient simulation of rolling in large number of roughing and finishing passes. Application of the model is presented below. Special attention is paid to the application of the relationships relating the mechanical properties of the product at room temperature to the microstructural parameters and thermal conditions.
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
241 7,2. LI
Validation
Experiments: The steel contained 0.18%C, 1.3%Mn, 0.33%Si, 0.024%P, 0.021%S, 0.076%V, 0.002%A1. and 0.009%N. Among the microalloying additions, vanadium plays a special role. Although this element is thought to have a moderate influence on the austenite microstructure evolution during thermomechanical processing, a strong effect on ferrite morphology and strength properties was reported by Zajac et al., (1995). Despite this, a quantitative description of the vanadium effect on the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties is still incomplete. Vanadium in the steel is claimed to increase the steel's yield strength to a value within the range of 520-550 MPa. The material was obtained as a 70-ton industrial heat, cast on the continuous caster into billets, having a cross section of 140x140 mm. The ascast billets were rolled into rods of 8 mm in diameter. The rolling process consists of several technological stages, including: preheating, roughing passes, intermediate and finish rolling, and cooling on the cooling bed. Finish rolling in six passes and cooling on the cooling bed are the most important stages for shaping the final microstructure of the rods. Therefore, the research was focussed on this stage. In the course of rolling, specimens were cut and quenched to allow for the austenite grain size measurements at the entry to the last stand and approximately 15 s after the last pass. The temperature of the rods was measured using an infrared pyrometer. Specimens for the measurement of mechanical properties and quantitative metallography were taken after cooling on the cooling bed. The mean linear intercept method was used to determine the austenite and ferrite grain sizes, and for the pearlite interlamellar spacing measurements. Models: The metal flow and the temperature distribution during muhipass rolling were calculated using the generalized plane-strain finite-element analysis, coupled with the conventional approach to microstructure evolution modeling. The equations, developed by Kuziak et al., (1997), pertaining to dynamic, metadynamic and static recrystallization, static recovery, and grain growth after recrystallization, presented in Tables 6.4, 6.5, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 6.11, and 6.13, were adopted in the study. As a result, the deformation history of a particular element can be interrelated with the local microstructural changes taking place during and after rolling. Thus, the whole picture of the rolling process is created in the calculations through the superposition of events taking place within individual elements. As a consequence, the influence of the inhomogeneity of the deformation on the microstructure evolution can receive better substantiation than by treating deformation and microstructure evolution independently. During numerical calculations, the condition for dynamic recrystallization initiation is checked. When it is fulfilled, the dynamically recrystallized volume Abaction within the material is calculated. This fraction is assumed to recrystallize metadynamically after deformation. Further, static recrystallization and static recovery are assumed to operate in the regions of the deformed material where dynamic recrystallization is not initiated, or is not completed during the deformation. The investigation shows that the grain growth of dynamically and statically recrystallized grains can be calculated using the same equation (Kuziak et al, 1997; see Table 6.13). The temperature model is used for the simulation of the cooling of the rods on the cooling bed. The heat generated during phase transformation is also accounted for in this model. The most important microstructural parameters of the ferritepearlite microstructure include the ferrite grain size, ferrite volume fraction, and pearlite interlamellar spacing. The set of equations relating the ferrite grmn size, ferrite volume fraction, and pearlite interlamellar spacing, to the chemical composition of a steel, austenite grain size SHAPE ROLLING
242
prior to the transformation, and cooling rate over the transformation temperatures range are given in Table 6.14. The equations describing the mechanical properties of the vanadium steel at room temperature are given in Tables 6.15 and 6.16.
05 10 15 20 25 30
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
X, mm
X, mm
Figure 7.2 Results of calculations of strain (a), average strain rate (b) and temperature (c) distributions at the cross-section of the work piece at the end of the last pass
0.5
1.0
1.5
20
25
3.0
X, mm
Results - metalflowand temperature: Thefinishrolling of the rods consists of six passes. The temperature of the rods entering the first finishing pass is stable, in the range of 900925°C. A very short interval between consecutive passes, not exceeding 0.2 s, is the most important feature of the finish rolling. The results of thefinite-elementcalculations of strain, strain rate and temperature distributions at the cross-section of the work piece at the end of the last pass are shown in Figure 7.2. Due to the two axes of symmetry, only one quarter of the AdA THEMA TJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
243.
cross-section is presented in these figures. A strong inhomogeneity of the plastic flow during the rolling is clearly seen. However, the most striking feature of the process is the temperature increase, of approximately 100°C at the exit, which is connected to the plastic work during deformations. Results - microstructure: The influence of the processing conditions on the austenite microstructure evolution is demonstrated in Figure 7.3a. The microstructure evolution model predicts that dynamic recrystallization will be initiated in the material under deformation conditions existing in the industrial rod rolling process. Consequently, metadynamic recrystallization operates during the intervals between passes. However, short interpass times preclude full restoration of the microstructure. This leads to strain accumulation and further triggers the dynamic recrystallization process. Figure 7.3b shows the distribution of the recrystallized volume fraction at the cross-section of the rod, at the exitfi-omthe last pass. Recrystallization kinetics is observed to be nonuniform. Full recrystallization is observed at the upper part of the cross section, while only 20% recrystallized volume is predicted in the center of the rod. Significant grain growth occurred after the last pass, diminishing the beneficial effect of the dynamic recrystallization on the austenite grain refinement. This is associated with a high finish rolling temperature.
recrystallized volume fraction
^•Ro 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 X, mm Figure 7.3 Results of calculations of (a) distributions of austenite grain size and (b) recrystallized volume fraction, at the exit from the last pass Results - room temperature properties: The cooling process takes place on the cooling bed. The most important feature of this operation pertains to the heat transfer conditions. The rods are cut and collected at the exit of the roll stands in bundles of 10 - 15. The bundles are transferred to the cooling bed. The cooling history of a particular rod depends on its location in the bundle. Approximate cooling curves were measured in the laboratory experiment, in which the rods' arrangement and the heat transfer conditions were close to those prevailing in the rolling mill. The results (Kuziak et al., 1996) for the eutectoid steel rods are presented in SHAPE ROLLING
244 Figure 7.4a. Estimates of the rods' cooling rates were used for the evaluation of the heat transfer coefficient in the thermal model. Measurements and calculations of temperatures during cooling were used for the prediction of microstructural parameters and mechanical properties at room temperature. The results of the strength properties are listed in Table 7.1.
b)
a) 1000
1000
950 900 H
900
850-1 ^^800 3
lie centre
-;^—
measurement, surface]
-^—
measurement, center
-^—
prediction, surface
- 0 —
prediction, centre
800
750 H
to
w 700H
I 650
700 external area
600-|
600
550-] 500 450
1 100
1 200
1 300 tfme,s
1 400
1 500
500 100
200 300 time, s
400
I 500
Figure 7.4 (a) Temperatures measured during cooling of rods in bundles and (b) comparison of measured and calculated temperatures during cooling of a single rod Table 7.1 Measured and predicted strength properties of the rods located in the center and external area of the bundle consisting of 12 rods ultimate tensile strength, MPa yield strength, MPa location measured predicted measured predicted center 675 662 (502+160) 540 530(377+153) external area 693 688 (522+166) 556 550 (388+162)
7.2.2
I-beams and rails
The model has been successfully applied to the simulation of thermal, mechanical and microstructural phenomena during rolling of various other shapes (Figures 7.5 and 7.6). Figure 7.5 shows the calculated distribution of the temperature at the exit from the last pass during rolling of an I-beam. Two plots are presented. One is obtained with an assumption of symmetrical cooling of the I-beam from the top and from the bottom (Figure 7.5a). The second plot represents the results obtained for forced cooling applied to the top surface of the shape. Figure 7.6 shows the results of simulation of rail cooling after the rolling process. Temperature distributions at the cross section of the rail, at 400, 800 and 1400 seconds after the exit from the last pass, are presented in this figure. MATHEMAHCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
245 a) mmmmmm 860 880 900 920 940 960 980
0
50
0
100 150 200 250 300 350 40
50
100 150 200 250 300 350 40
X, m m
X, m m
Figure 7.5 Distributions of temperature at the cross section of I-beam at the exit from last pass; (a) uniform cooling from the bottom and the top, (b) accelerated cooling from the top
a)
b) 60
60
600 630 660 690 720 750 780 i
40
40
20
20
E
£
0
-20 -40
49C 520 550 580 610 640
fr^
w
H
iiiiDiiiiir)
^
^--^-. ,-, /
^^^m
-60 -80 -60 -40 -20
0
20
40
60
80
-80 -60 -40 -20
6
20
40
60
80
y, mm
X, mm
C)
320 335 350 365 380 395 Figure 7.6 Distributions of temperature at the cross section of rail during cooling after rolling; 400 s (a), 800 s (b) and 1400 s (c) after exit from the last pass (courtesy of Dr. M. Glowacki)
-80 -60 -40 -20
0
20
40
60
80
y, mm
SHAPE ROLLING
246
.
The validation of the method was performed by comparing the measured and predicted microstructural parameters. Beyond this, simulation of the temperature field during the cooling of shapes agreed with the experimental data, as well. Analysis of all the results presented by Glowacki et al., (1995), Kuziak et al., (1996), Glowacki et al., (1996) and Glowacki, (1997), as well as the results shown in Figures 7.2-7.6 confirms the predictive ability of the models, based on the generalized plane strain approach. The savings of computing time and required computer memory are the main advantages of the generalized plane strain model. The tests performed by Glowacki (not published) have shown that the computing time and required memory in this model are about 100 - 150 times smaller than in the full three-dimensional solutions. These advantages make the generalized plane strain model a useful and efficient tool in the simulation of shape rolling processes and in computer aided roll pass design. 7. 2.3
The temperature, roll force and torque during hot bar rolling - simple models
Low carbon steel bars, 16 mm square, were rolled in four passes, consisting of a squarediamond-square sequence, to a 10 mm square cross-section. The roll separating forces and the roll torques were determined as a function of the area reduction at entry temperatures of 900, 950, 1000, 1050 and 1100°C. The predictions of the roll forces and torques by several models were compared to the experimental data, with mixed success. Simplified one dimensional models, derived for the calculation of the roll force and torque, and mostly based on empirical modifications of the flat rolling theories, have also been published (Arnold and Whitton, 1975; Orowan and Pascoe, 1948; Shinokura and Takai, 1986; and Khaikin et al, 1971). The present study is aimed at comparing the predictions of roll forces and torques from the various simplified rolling formulae with experimentally measured values in bar rolling. An attempt is made to control carefully the experimental conditions. Neither front nor back tension is applied. The effects of temperature change and reduction on the predictive abilities of some of the traditional models, developed for bar rolling, are examined. Material and sample preparation: AISI 1018 carbon steel bars, for which the chemical composition is given in Table 7.2, were used in the experiments. The material was obtained in the form of hot rolled squares with 16 mm long sides. All bars were annealed at 900°C for two hours and air cooled to room temperature in order to remove prior texture variations and anisotropy caused by previous operations. Table 7.2 The chemical composition of the material (wt%) C Mn Si S P Fe 0.19 0.75 0.05 0.007 0.009 Rest The samples to be rolled were cut from the annealed bars to 80 mm length. The samples were fitted with three type K (chromel - alumel) thermocouples, with Inconel sheaths of 1.6 mm outside diameter, embedded in 25 mm deep holes drilled in the tail ends. Equipment: All experiments were carried out on a two high, experimental Stanat mill, fitted with grooved rolls of 135 mm maximum diameter x 200 mm face width, made of H13 tool steel hardened to Rockwell C55. The surface finish of the rolls was obtained by sand blasting. The mill is driven by a 15 kW constant torque, DC motor. The two drive spindles MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
247 contain the torque transducers to measure roll torque while the roll separating forces are monitored by two force transducers, located over the bearing blocks of the top work roll. A tube type furnace is used to heat the specimens to the desired deformation temperature. Roll Pass Design: The square - diamond - square sequence is used as a break-down pass to obtain the rapid reduction of sectional area. In this sequence, the roll gap can be controlled and hence the profile geometry can be regulated, and there is little danger of metal twisting in the pass. The design of the above pass profiles followed the recommendations of Wuastowski, (1969). In designing the square or diamond passes, Holzweiler's formulae, presented by Wusatowski are used, as given below: Square-in-diamond pass: /,_!= 1.372a,-0.758^^
(7.3)
w,_^= 1.758
(7.4)
a,-2.024^0^
Diamond-in-square pass: a,_i =0.505r, +0.346w,_,
(7.5)
/,_, =H',_, =1.414a,_,
(7.6)
In the above sequence, square passes alternate with diamond ones. Table 7.3 gives the dimensions of the roll grooves. The total number of passes is four with a total and mean coefficients of elongation Xt = 2.48 and ?ijn = (X,J Table 7.3 Roll groove dimensions pass no. 1 entry section square a 15.97 X 15.97
exit section a (t>i ta
X Wa
area red. %
= 1.26, respectively.
2 square 14.58 X 14.58
3 diamond 13.77
90^ 22.58 X 22.58 square 14.58 X 14.58
90^ 20.62 X 20.62 diamond 13.77
50.99° 11.85x24.85
90^ 20.62 X 20.62 16.65
130^ 11.85x24.85 30.74
90° 14.73 X 14.73
square 10.42 X 10.42
26.26
4 square 10.42 X 10.42 90° 14.73 X 14.73 square 10.15x10.15 90° 14.36 X 14.36 5.12
Wusatowski (1969) recommends a range of elongation coefficients for square-in-diamond and diamond-in-square passes. His values are close to the numbers indicated above. Note that the process of designing the pass sequence, involving the determination of the number of passes, their distribution along the roll and their profile shape is completely empirical.
SHAPE ROLLING
248
,
Experimental procedure: The bars, fully instrumented with the thermocouples, are heated for 15 minutes in the furnace, pre-heated slightly above the testing temperature. The speed of the rolling mill is set at 10 rpm, giving a roll surface velocity of 70.69 mm/s. It was found necessary to use guides for the bars, both at entry and exit, in order to minimize sideways bending. The parameters monitored during the experiments include the temperature, roll force and torque. Time-history of the temperature distribution: A typical temperature history during three passes and subsequent quenching is shown in Figure 7.7.
n—r 15 20 25 30 35 time (s)
45 60
Figure 7.7 The time-temperature history of three passes during rod rolling
The roll speed was 10 rpm, leading to a roll surface velocity of 70.69 mm/s. Three thermocouples were embedded in the bar, at locations shown in the figure. One of the thermocouples is at the center of the bar, marked (A); another (B), is at the mid-height, and the third (C) is placed as close to the surface as possible, without causing fracture due to stress concentration. The temperature of the bar is uniform while in the closed furnace. As soon as it is removed, the surface begins to cool at a rate faster than the center. The properties of the product will depend on the temperature, in addition to the cooling rate, and since the latter varies across the cross-section, a homogeneous product will not be obtained. The cooling rates in air, at all three locations, are quite similar. At entry to the roll gap the thermocouple (C), closest to the surface, indicates a fairly large temperature drop, the magnitude of which depends on the true contact area, the pressure distribution, the temperature of the roll surface, the relative velocity, the interfacial shear stress, the development of scales and finally, on the interfacial heat transfer coefficient. The temperature drop in the first pass is nearly 100°C, accompanying a 16.65% area reduction. In the second pass a 30.74% area reduction is caused and in spite of this larger reduction imparted to the bar, the temperature loss is lower, near 50°C. In the third pass of 26.26% reduction, a fairly large drop of about 180°C is observed.
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
249 The thermocouple (A), placed in the center of the bar, indicates a small increase in the temperature, reacting to the heat generated by the plastic work done in the pass. The thermocouple at mid-height largely follows the one at the center. Of the three heat transfer mechanisms, the predominant one is due to conduction to the cold roll surface. The heat flux depends on the nature of the contact at the surface, including the temperature difference of the surfaces, the normal pressure, the interfacial shear stress, the relative velocity and most importantly, the random nature of the development of the surface scales. The large normal pressures in pass #2 break up the scale formed prior to entry and when the bar arrives at pass # 3, the thickness of the layers of scale are less than they were at the entry to the second pass. Less scaling has been shown to increase the heat flux (Murata et al, 1984), resulting in the increased drop of the surface temperature. After exit, the hot center acts as a heat source and the surface of the bar regains most of the temperature losses. Roll force and torque: Figures 7.8 and 7.9 show the effect of the average bar temperature on the roll force and torque in the first two rolling passes, respectively. In each figure the roll force in IcN is plotted on the left ordinate, the roll torque in kNm on the right ordinate and the temperature is given on the abscissa. Figure 7.8 is for pass 1, the square-square pass, with an area reduction of 16.65, and Figure 7.9 shows pass 2, with area reductions of 30.74%, and 26.26%, respectively. As expected, the decreasing temperature causes the mill loads to increase. As well, cross-plotting allows one to conclude the expected result, that increasing reduction leads to increasing forces and torques. 70
0.50
1.6
120
60
1.4
100 H
1.2
50
E
f
|80
1.0
0.30 E
"" 4 0 H
§60-1
hO.8
0)
130. & 20 10
0.20 Roil speed =10rpm Area reduction - 16.65 % Pass #1 (Square - Square) a Roll force o Roll torque — 1
0
800
\
900
1 0.10
1 —
1000
2-
^
0.6
1 40
Roll speed =10rpm Area reduction = 30.74% Pass #2 (Square - Diamond) 20H o Roll force o Roll torque 0 750 800 850 average temperature
average temperature fC)
Figure 7.8 The roll force and the roll torque in the first pass
1
0.4 1-0.2 0.0
('C)
Figure 7.9 The roll force and the roll torque in the second pass
The mathematical models. Accurate computation of the roll force and torque when rolling with grooved rolls is considerably more complicated than in flat rolling. There are essentially three problems, present during flat rolling as well, but somewhat easier to handle. These are the material's resistance to deformation, as a fiinction of the strain, strain rate and temperature, the ability to calculate the distributions of the strains, strain rates, stress and
SHAPE ROLLING
250 temperature in the deformation zone and the conditions at the roll/metal interface, that is, the coefficients of heat transfer and friction. There are several empirical formulae, published in the technical literature, that allow the prediction of the roll force and roll torque during the rolling of bars. Most of these are based on models of flat rolling with modifications that introduce expressions for draft, roll radius, contact area and coefficient of friction for various pass shapes. Some of the models, to be used in the comparison that follows, are repeated below for the sake of completeness. Arnold and Whitton's formula (1975) for the roll separating force is derived from Sims's hot flat rolling theory (Sims, 1954). Modifications to account for the projected area of contact and empirical factors result in the relation: P = \.\S{2k)A^Q^S,
(7.7)
where Ik is the mean flow strength in the pass, calculated using Shida's relations (Shida, 1974) in the present work. Sj- is an empirical factor, equal to 1.3 for diamond-square, squarediamond, and all square passes, and Qp is a multiplier, dependent on the reduction and the ratio of the roll radius and the exit thickness. Values for Qp have been given by Larke (1957) as a function of the reduction and the geometry. The projected contact area is given by: ^.=0.85^>.,L,
(7.8)
where the projected length of contact and the final width are given, respectively, by: ^. = V ^ ( ^ 7 ^
and
w^=0.96w
p-
(7.9)
Orowan and Pascoe (1948) modified their simplified theory of flat rolling to be convenient for bar rolling. Assuming sticking friction, their formulae are: P = \.\55(2k)w„L,
(7.10)
where: ^m=
'3
^'
(7.11)
Shinokura and Takai (1986) introduced a method for calculating the effective roll radius, the projected contact area, the non-dimensional roll force and the torque arm coefficient which were expressed as simple functions of the geometry of the deformation zone. These variables are given for square to oval, round to oval, square to diamond, diamond to diamond and oval to oval passes. The authors used a simple formula for computing the roll force: P = Q,A^(2k)
(7.12)
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
251
where the projected contact area is: A^ =-{0.9w,)L,
=Q.573w,L,
(7.13)
TT
The projected length of contact in the deformation zone is:
^-=JI^-^|('^-'J
(7.14)
the multiplier, Qs, is given by: a=-0.731 + 0 . 7 7 1 M + ^ M
(7.15)
where M is dependent on the projected contact area and the initial and final cross sections:
Khaikin et al., (1971) developed a relation for the projected area of contact for squarediamond-square sequences, given below:
^,=J^«4
(7.17)
In the present study Eq. (7.17) is combined with the equations of Shinokura and Takai to calculate the roll force. Khaikin et al. (1971) refer to over 300 experiments in which the validity of their model was checked. Box passes, diamond - diamond, diamond - square diamond, round - oval and oval - square passes were included in the tests. The probability that the ratio Pcau/Pexp is between 0.8 - 1.2 was determined to be 0.77. The range 0.7 - 1.3 is reached with a probability of 0.93. Unfortunately, neither the details of the experiments nor the actual data are given in their publication. Comparison of the experiments and the predictions: The range of validity of the formulae are quite broad and most of the experimental data can be accommodated. The temperature range is between 700 and 1200°C, eliminating the possibility of using all of the data of the third and fourth passes. The strain rate is calculated using the formula of Arnold andWhitton (1975):
s^2^^^^\-:L^
(7.18)
SHAPE ROLLING
252
The results of the comparisons are shown in Figure 7.10, for the first pass. Only the roll force data are used , since the roll torques are closely dependent on that, obtained as the force, multiplied by an assumed moment arm, given by Tselikov et al., (1980) as 0.375 - 0.5 for diamond-square combinations. As observed, none of the models is capable of accurate prediction of the roll force. Consistency in the predictive capabilities of a model is more important than accuracy, however, and in that regard the models of Shinokura and Takai (1986) and that of Khaikin et al., (1971) are superior to that of Arnold and Whitton (1975) and Orowan and Pascoe (1948). While underpredicting the forces, both models may be multiplied by a constant, approximately equal to two, to raise them to equal the measurements. The differences in the models concern deformation geometry exclusively, since the temperatures used are the measurements, and the resistance to deformation is determined in an identical manner, shown to be accurate and consistent for all. A three-dimensional model of metal flow would be necessary to define the exact contact surfaces in the roll gap and to calculate the vertical separating force.
2.20 2.00 1.80
+ O D A
Arnold and Whitton Orowan and Pascoe Shinokura and Takai Khaikin etal.
1.60 1.40 1.20
800
900
1000
1100
1200
average temperature ('C)
Figure 7.10 The predictive abilities of the empirical models
MA THEMA 77CAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TJON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
253^
Chapter 8 Parameter Evaluation in Metal Forming In general, inverse analysis is designed to evaluate either the material constants in various models or the coefficients in the boundary conditions. The application of this technique to the determination of thermal properties of materials and the heat transfer coefficient has already been presented (Malinowski et al., 1994). However, the field in which inverse analysis in metal forming is applied most often is concerned with the identification of rheological parameters in the constitutive laws for the materials, subjected to plastic deformation. Tension, torsion and compression tests are routinely carried out when the rheological parameters of a material in metal forming processes are to be determined. The relative advantages and disadvantages of these three testing techniques are well understood. They are discussed by Pietrzyk et al., (1993b) as well as in Chapter 3. They refer to the ease of conducting a tension test and the difficulty of coping with low levels of possible straining before the triaxiality of the stresses develops. Interfacial friction and the attendant barreling of samples are the factors that affect axisymmetric compression. The need for some interpretation of the resuhs of torsion tests, demanded by the variations of stresses and strains along the radius of the sample, is its main drawback. Deformation heating and heat transfer to the tool are additional phenomena affecting the results in all tests. The major difficulty involved with the interpretation of the results of all tests is connected with the inhomogeneity of deformation, caused by various factors, depending on the type of the test. Finite-element simulation of plastometric tests allows the prediction of the real state of deformation, accounting for all factors causing the inhomogeneity. However, for numerical analysis of metal flow and heat transfer in metal forming processes these models require the description of the actual material properties, which are introduced in the program in the form of a constitutive law. The approach, which assumes that the constitutive parameters of the material are known, is often used and is called the direct method. Since the main objective of performing a mechanical test is to determine the material parameters, the application of the direct method is limited. This fact led to the development of a new parameter estimation method, which is known as the inverse method. The general idea of this method is based on a combination of the finite-element simulation of the test with the measurements of overall parameters, such as the force or torque (Gelin and Ghouati, 1994; Kusiak et al., 1995; Malinowski et al., 1995; Khoddam et al., 1996; Gavrus et al., 1996). Measurements of process parameters are compared with the predictions by the finite-element method. The error norm is defined as the vector of distances between these measured and calculated values. The minimization of error norm is used to determine the unknown parameters in the constitutive law. The objective of the present chapter is to describe the principles of the inverse technique. The definition of the error norm and methods of minimization of this error are discussed. Also, the applications of the parameter estimation method concerning mechanical tests and the uniqueness of the constitutive parameters thus obtained are investigated. The general presentation of inverse analysis is followed by several case studies, in which the description of its implementation to the evaluation of important parameters of metal forming processes is examined.
254 8.1
PARAMETER EVALUATION - THE INVERSE ANALYSIS
8.1.1
General principles of the inverse method
When constitutive laws are described analytically by one of the equations discussed in Chapter 3, the rheologicai analysis is reduced to the computation of the unknown material parameters in these equations. These parameters are grouped in the vector of unknown variables X = (xi, JC2, , Xr}, where r represents the number of variables in the constitutive law. Additional information, obtained from experimental observations, is also required. Starting from the rheologicai measurements one must obtain a systematic set of experimental data d"" =[d^,ci^,d^, ,^3» »^« ^^^ given values of the rheologicai parameters, x. The inverse analysis is formulated in order to determine the constitutive coefficients for which the difference between experimental measurements and computed data is minimal. Quantitatively, the analysis is reduced to the minimization of an objective function with respect to the unknown vector of parameters, x. A classical identification problem is obtained and the objective (cost) function is written in a least squares sense: •iix)=±w,[if{x)-dr]
(8.1)
/=1
where w^ are the weighting factors necessary to scale the cost function value (see section 8.2.4) and n is the number of measurements of the parameter d. Inverse analysis can be based on more than one process parameter. The cost function O is then written in the form:
^*)=ti-.k w-^;r =ii:^,bwf=r^r
(8.2)
where n is the number of measurements performed for k process parameters. The residual vector r is defined as: r = d^-d"
(8.3)
where d"* is the vector of the measured parameters and d'' is the vector of the calculated ones, both multiplied by the vector weighting factors, w,. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
____^^^^^_^^^
255
The cost function, equations (8.1) or (8.2), is subject to the minimization procedure leading to the evaluation of the optimal values of variables, which are assumed to be the actual Theological parameters. The flow chart showing schematically the general principles of the inverse technique is shown in Figure 8.1.
INVERSE METHOD
FEM morf6l of a jpfOCeis& calculation of process p^rameter^
I
Measurement of process parameters: dr j=1,...,k i=1,...,n k - number of parameters n - number of sampling points
Comj^utation «l ^ iiBrhf&ihfes with respect fofTujclei
—_
gradient methods
non-gradient methods
minimization of the error norm
NO
RESULT optimal model variables: x
Figure 8.1 Flow chart of the inverse method
8.1.2
Definition of the cost function for practical solutions
The cost flinction depends on the variables to be evaluated by inverse analysis. The most common application of the inverse method in metal forming is the parameter estimation in the rheological models. The experimental data for this analysis are supplied by one of the plastometric tests. These data may include compression loads in a plane strain or in axisymmetric PARAMETER EVALUA T70N IN METAL FORMING
256 compression tests or torques from the torsion test. Estimating the Theological parameters is usually achieved by minimizing the length of the distance vector, which is defined as the sum of the squares of the differences between the measurements and model values. For example, when estimating the constitutive parameters using the measured loads FJ" in the axisymmetric or plane strain compression tests, the cost function has the form:
(^.^2,^3,--,^J=J-i—^-(/^^-^
(8-4)
where X\,X2, ...,x are rheological parameters, n is the total number of sampling points of the measurements, the subscript / designates the number of the measurement and Fl" and Fl" are the calculated and measured loads at a given /, respectively. For an appropriate constitutive equation, the true constitutive parameters minimize the above sum.
8.2
OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES
The minimization of an objective function is a major component of the parameter estimation method. In the general case, when the number of parameters is large, the objective function (cost function) may have several minima, and it is necessary to make sure that the minima obtained from the optimization identify the global one. This condition is met when the initial estimates of the optimization variables are close enough to the global minimum. If a good initial guess is provided, then the local minimum obtained from the optimization procedure and the global minimum coincide. The choice of the search method adequate to the given cost function is another important task, influencing the technique's efficiency. Providing a good initial guess for the optimization and selecting the proper search method are also discussed in this chapter. 8.2.1
Minimization of a function
The minimization problem in general form can be stated as follows: Minimize cost function 4>(x) subject to: gj (x) < 0, j = 1, /,
inequality constraints
/?^(x)=0, A: = 1,4
equality constraints
x\ < X, < xl,
side constraints
7 = 1, /,
(8.5)
where x = {x,,X2, ..,x^}^ is the vector of optimization variables, xl,x" are lower and upper limits of the variable x, and t , //, and t , are the numbers of equality, inequality and side constraints, respectively. It is common in optimization to combine the cost function and its conMA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
____^^^^^^
257
straints, leading to a new, unconstrained cost function and the problem can be treated as unconstrained optimization. Whatever strategy has been chosen for the optimization of a function of several variables, the problem can always be broken into two tasks. The first is an evaluation of the search direction, and the second is a determination of the length of the step performed along the search directions. An initial set of optimization variables, x^, is required for a majority of the optimization algorithms. The design is updated iteratively, beginning from this starting point. The most common form of this iterative procedure is given by: x'=x'-U>^s
(8.6)
where / is the iteration number and the scalar quantity p defines the distance to move in the search direction vector s. Different methods of optimization offer distinct schemes for determining s and p. Since any optimization problem involves many steps in which the vector s is maintained constant, while the minimum oi<^(p) is sought, methods for the minimization of a fimction of one variable and the methods for bracketing the minimum become important. Most algorithms, such as the polynomial approximation or golden section method, which are commonly used to find the minimum of a fimction, are based on the knowledge of the bounds of the minimum. In situations without a physical insight to identify the bounds on the solution, it is important that a logical approach be introduced for finding them. Generally, these bounds are not known a priori. If they are overestimated, the number of computations involved increases significantly. In many situations, it is not possible to evaluate the derivative of the cost function with respect to p for a proposed vector s. Instead, an algorithm must be implemented for finding the bounds on the minimum of O using only the function values. In general, three function values are needed to ensure that the correct upper and lower bounds on the minimum are identified. Once these bounds are identified, one can use several methods for finding the minimum for a function of one variable. The golden section method or the Fibonacci method are often chosen for a variety of reasons. First, while the fiinction is assumed to have only one minimum, it need not have continuous derivatives. In special cases, this method can handle functions having more than one minimum or that are discontinuous. Secondly, contrary to polynomial or other curve fitting techniques, the rate of convergence for the Fibbonaci numbers method is known. The method is found to be reliable for poorly conditioned problems. Details for the bracketing of the minimum of the cost function as well as the description of the golden section method can be found in any introductory text on optimization, see for example Schwefel (1981). 8.2.2
Search methods
One way of categorizing optimization algorithms is according to the type of information that must be provided for finding the minimum of the function. The simplest approach to minimize 0(x) is a random selection of large numbers of x vectors and an evaluation of the cost function for each of them. The x corresponding to the minimum of 0(x) obtained from this set is called the optimum, x*. These methods, which require only function evaluation in searching for the optimum, are known as the non-gradient methods. PARAMETER EVALUATION IN METAL FORMING
258 The non-gradient methods are usually reliable and are easy to program. They can often deal with non-convex and discontinuous functions, and in many cases can work with discrete values of design variables. Among non-gradient methods, the stochastic methods based on random search are considered to be less efficient, but they are effective in global optimization problems. A more difficuh, but more efficient approach to the minimization problem is to use gradient information in seeking the optimum. Since the cost function in the inverse analysis often contains an experimental component, which may contain experimental noise, the derivatives of the cost function may give misleading search directions. Moreover, because the gradients are often calculated numerically, the methods need more function evaluations and, in consequence, require longer computation times than non-gradient methods. Selected gradient and non-gradient search methods are discussed briefly. Monte Carlo method. This technique belongs to the group of stochastic methods, which are described in detail by Szmelter, (1980). The points in this method are chosen randomly, and the minimum value is remembered after each choice. After several cycles of choice and the selection of a minimum value, the overall minimum of Q>{i) is localized. This method is efficient in the preliminary approximation of the minimum, in the case when there is a lack of information about possible localization of this minimum. It is also efficient when the objective function is irregular. The Monte Carlo method provides the opportunity to select the points, which can be omitted during a systematic search performed by other methods, to be described below. In consequence, this method increases the probability of finding the global minimum rather than the local minima. Long computing times are the main drawback of the Monte Carlo method. Therefore, it is usually used for the primary search, which is followed by a final search, using one of the following methods. PowelVs method (Powell, 1964) is one of the most efficient and reliable of the zero order methods. Let {s\ sV.., s"} be a set of linearly independent vectors where n is the total number of design variables, and x° is a vector of initial estimate of x. The following steps must be followed to apply the Powell's algorithm: 1. For / = 1, 2,
, A?find0 that minimizes 0(x'"' + 0s') with respect to 0 and define:
x' = x'-'+y5V 2. For 7 = 1, 2 , . . . . , w . 1, replace s' by s'^^ 3. Replaces"by x " - x ^ 4. Find 0 " that minimizes o(x" + y^" [x" - x° ]) with respect to 0 and replace x^ by:
x«+y5"[x"-x«]. 5. Go to step 1 unless the cost function is smaller than the desired value. In order to start the algorithm, the unit vectors in an ^-dimensional system of coordinates can be used in place of {s\ s^ ..., s"}.
MA THEMA JJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
259 The simplex method. This is one of the most efficient non-gradient search methods. Simplex is a family of closely related methods in optimization. Among several versions of the simplex method, the one proposed by Nedler and Mead, (1965), is discussed below. The name "simplex" is derived from the simplest solid in w - dimensional space. For example, a three dimensional simplex is a tetrahedron. In general, an w-dimensional simplex has w + 1 vertices. In order to start the simplex search, the objective function is evaluated at each of the n + 1 vertices. This is called the initial simplex. It is assumed then that the optimum lies in a direction pointing av^ay from the vertex with the highest cost function and towards the other vertices. If a new point can be found with a lower function value, this point replaces the original vertex with the highest value. The shape of the simplex changes and gradually its size becomes smaller after each iteration. As the search progresses, the simplex adapts itself to the local minimum of the cost function. The search is terminated once the simplex has contracted to a size that is less than the required accuracy. After evaluating the cost function at the w + 1 vertices of the simplex, x'', x' and x^, corresponding to the highest, second highest and lowest values of the cost function can be identified. A new point, x^, is determined as the centroid of the vertices, excluding x^ from the following relationship:
x'=^Z«'
(8-7)
The highest points TL^ and x^ may be used to produce a new point x'^: x"=(l + a y - - a x ' '
(8.8)
where a is a positive constant. Observe that x'^ lies on an extension of the line from x'' to x"" and if a value of a =1.0 is chosen, the distance between x* and T^ equals that between x"" and x'^. If O(x') <
(8.9)
where ;^ is a positive constant, greater than unity and is usually chosen to be 2.0. The point with the maximum value of O is then replaced by whichever of x^ and x'^ has the lowest cost function O. The process is then started again with this new simplex. If O(X^)>a)(x^) but o(x'^)
260
x*=^'-+(l-^y
(8.10)
where ^ is a constant between 0 and I, and usually is chosen as 0.5. The highest point x is replaced by whichever of x^ and x'^ has the lowest cost function Q> and the process is repeated. Finally, if o(x'^)><|)(x^), then no improvement has been made by moving in the current direction. This is probably because the optimum is within the simplex. A contraction of the whole simplex towards the lowest point is performed, by applying the following operation: x' =7jX' -^{l-Tjy
(8.11)
where ;; is a constant, between 0 and 1. The operation, Eq. (8.11), is applied to each of the vertices x'. Small values of TJ may improve the rate of the convergence. A severe contraction, by choosing an exceedingly small value of TJ , however, is likely to cause the optimum to be missed. A typical value for T] is 0.5. The optimization process is then restarted with the contracted simplex. The non-gradient methods described above are used in all examples discussed later in this chapter. Since gradient methods are efficiently applied in several works dealing with the inverse analysis, they are presented briefly below. The gradient methods. Gavrus et al., (1996), use a gradient-based procedure, known as the Gauss-Newton method, combined with a line search algorithm. This requires the computations of the derivatives of the cost function (8.1), with respect to the optimization variables x:
^ dxj
= Z2.,kW-''rl^ ^
"^
(8.12)
'dxj
where dd^'iidxj represents the Sy term of the sensitivity matrix S and n is the number of measurements. Gelin and Ghouati, (1994, 1995) incorporated the parameters directly in the objective function, as follows: 0*(x)=S(x)+iC;(x)
(8.13)
where q is the number of inequality constraints. The weighted penalty functions, Q, are the inverse barrier functions, proposed by Carroll, (1961): 0),
(8.14) where Wj are the non-negative weights and ^X^) ^^^ ^^^ inequality constraints. MA THEMA JICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TJON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
_^^____^^_^^^^
261^
Gelin and Ghouati, (1994, 1995), solve the non-linear least squares problem using a modified Levenberg'Marquardt method, which accounts for the weighted penalty functions in the objective function O (Marquardt, 1963). Starting from an initial parameter guess x^, which satisfies the constraints, the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method determines a sequence of corrections to the parameters until convergence is reached according to specified criteria. The parameter correction, dJ", at iteration k is calculated from the following equations set (Schnur andZabaras, 1992): [(j^f J^ +A^I + H ^ ] ^ ^ = - ( j ^ f r^ +g^
(8.15)
where ^ is the Levenberg-Marquardt parameter, a non-negative scalar, J is the Jacobian matrix of S, and r is the residual vector defined by Eq. (8.3). In Eq. (8.15), g and H contain the first and second order derivatives of the weighted penalty functions with respect to the parameters X, respectively. Gelin and Ghouati, (1994) proposed an algorithm for the solution using the Levenberg-Marquardt method together with the finite-element approach for metal forming processes. This algorithm is presented in Table 8.1. Table 8.1 Algorithm for the solution using the Levenberg-Marquardt method coupled with the finiteelement code (Gelin and Ghouati, 1994) (l).Set the initial values of the parameters, x^"^ and the Levenberg-Marquardt parameter 1^^^ = 0.001. (2). Solve the direct finite element problem at x^®^ for the displacement u*^°^ and evaluate the cost function 0^°l (3).Set the initial penalty function weights coj^^ = O.OOOIC/®^ Q>^^\j = 1, q. Evaluate the penalty function, ^}^\j =l,q and the objective function 0*^®\ (4).For iteration k = 0, 1,2,.. . ,K (a) Calculate the Jacobian matrix, J^^\ using a finite difference approximation by solving six direct finite-element problems. (b) Calculate the penalty function derivatives to from tf *^ and g^^\ (c) Solve equation (8.15) for the parameter increment diP^\ and update the parameters: x<'"^> = x^^^ + ^^^l (d) Solve the finite-element problem at x^^^^\ Evaluate ^f'^^^j =\,qmd O*^^""^^ (e) Check if
262 and Gelin and Ghouati, (1995) discuss various approaches to this problem in detail. One possibility is to use the Gauss-Newton search method, which uses derivatives of the calculated process parameters d"" with respect to the variables x. A general relation, which defines the process parameters, is: d"=G(..,q,x,X)
(8.16)
where q is the vector containing all state variables and X is the vector of coordinates. Vector d"" can be a function of other parameters, such as time, depending on the finite element model. Startingfi*omthe relation, Eq. (8.16), differentiation with respect to x yields (Gavrus et al., 1996):
^
^ M ^ / ax ax ax
where r represents the number of nodal state variables. Identification studies by Tortorelli and Michaleris, (1994) show that the sensitivity analysis can be performed with finite difference computation, adjoint problem formulation, semianalytical method or direct differentiation of the fundamental equations. To define the complete sensitivity matrix, one must compute the nodal parametric sensitivity of all state variables with respect to the parameter vector x. A detailed description of this solution, based on the analytical calculation of derivatives ,is given by Gavrus et al., (1996). The Levenberg-Marquardt method requires the determination of the Jacobian matrix of sensitivities. Gelin and Ghouati, (1995) present this Jacobian for the incremental step-by-step finite-element calculations, using the displacements u as measured process parameters. The following relationship is obtained:
''^ ^i
^i
h\
dxi
for / = 1, . . . , « , ;
/ = 1 , ...,A?
(8.18)
where n is the number of measurements in one time step and rit is the number of time steps. The increment of displacement Au*^'"^^Ms obtained when the equilibrium is satisfied. Accounting for the general finite-element equation, Ku = f, the equilibrium condition is written as:
where m is a number of the time step, and K is the stiffness matrix. Kusiak and Thompson, (1989) give a detailed description of calculations of the derivatives of displacements u with respect to the unknown variables x. In their method these derivatives are calculated indirectly by analytical differentiation of Eq. (8.19), which leads to:
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
263
aR'"
aK'^
ax
ax
_^y*(»» + l) +K'""*'^
^(^„»(m^i)y
ax
af" = 0 ax
(8.20)
Assuming, however, that this matrix^does not depend on x, solving Eq. (8.20) for the unknown derivatives of displacements u* with respect to variables x, yields:
[K^'^'Y
ax
d('''
(8.21)
ax
The stiffness matrix K""^^ is available from the direct problem. The derivative of the load vector is determined next, calculated accounting for the following relationships: K^=JB^EB^
o = EBu
(8.22)
where E is the stress-strain matrix containing the flow stress, described by the constitutive equation, B is the strain-displacement matrix and o is the stress tensor.
ax
J*
(8.23)
ax
All quantities on the right hand side of Eq. (8.23) are calculated for the m^ time step. The term da/dx must be evaluated in a manner consistent with the algorithm, calculating the stress and state variables. This part of the sensitivity analysis depends on the constitutive behavior under consideration. The details are discussed by Gelin and Ghouati, (1995). 8.2.3
Scaling of the variables
The benefits and possible disadvantages of the scaling approach depend strongly on the search method, used in the optimization procedure. It may be useful to scale the variables in order to enhance the efficiency and reliability of the numerical process. Scaling is necessary when values of the variables x or the derivatives of the cost function O with respect to these variables differ significantly. If this happens for a two-variable function, the lines of constant value of the cost function form a series of ellipses with high aspect ratios. The application of a gradient method causes a complex iteration history with the direction vector changing at each iteration. Due to the shape of the design contours, a true minimum may not be reached during a reasonable number of iterations. The non-gradient techniques lead to the minimum, but also require a large number of iterations. Scaling of the cost function (8.1) is done by introducing a weighting factor wr. 1
for i = 1,. . . . , « (8.24) PARAMETER EVALUATION IN METAL FORMING
264 for / = 1 , . . . ., w In Eq. (8.24), n is the number of measurements of process parameters. In the case of a two-variable problem the cost function, after scaling, forms a set of concentric circles. The minimum is found in a relatively low number of iterations, using gradient methods. The nongradient methods will also be very efficient in this case. 8.2.4
Convergence criterion
An important part of the overall process is determining when to stop the iterations when finding a minimum. The choice of the termination criteria has a major effect on the efficiency and reliability of the optimization process. Two termination criteria are discussed below. The first termination criterion, which should always be used in combination with other convergence criteria, is based on terminating the search when the maximum number of iterations is exceeded. This ensures that if progress is extremely slow due to numerical or algorithm difficulties, the program will not continue to iterate indefinitely. The second criterion is based on the absolute or relative change in the cost function. This criterion checks the progress of optimization. Two variations should be used in this case to ensure that the progress has slowed sufficiently to indicate convergence. The first is to compare the absolute value of 0(x) in successive iterations and convergence is indicated if: \o{x')-Q>{x'-')\<e,
(8.25)
where q is an iteration number and e^ is a specified tolerance, which may be a constant such as s^ = 0.0001, or may be a fraction of the cost function value at x°, say s^ = O.000l|o(x° J|. The other criterion, which should be used, is a check on the relative change in 0(x) between successive iterations. Here, convergence is indicated if:
'
I /A
'^g.
(8.26)
where Sj^ is a specifiedfi-actionalchange such as 0.001. The use of both an absolute and a relative change convergence criterion ensures that convergence is identified if the magnitude of
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
__^_^ 8.2.5
26£ Constrained functions of n variables
The general problem of optimization is presented in Section 8.2.1. The common approach is to minimize the cost function as an unconstrained function, while providing some penahy to limit constraint violations, because the way in which the penahy function is imposed often leads to a numerically ill-conditioned problem. To avoid this, the problem is minimized several times and the penalty is increased as the optimization progresses. This requires the solution of several unconstrained minimization problems in obtaining the optimum constrained design. The classical approach is to create a pseudo-cost function of the form: r(x,rJ=
(8.27)
where 0(x) is the original cost function and P(x) is an imposed penalty function. The form of the penalty function depends on the chosen constraint method. A scalar, r^, is used as a multiplier for the penalty term to adjust the magnitude of the applied penalty. It is held constant during each unconstrained minimization stage. The subscript p is the unconstrained minimization number. The most important constraints for the parameter estimation method are the side constraints, defined in section 8.2.1. Each side constraint may be broken into two inequality constraints. Depending on the method chosen, the definition of the penalty term is different. One of the methods introduces the penalty function in Eq. (8.27) in the following form: m
PW = S ^ ; W
(8.28)
1=1
where.
8A^) (8.29) -1 -TLA
^*W = 2
fo"" ^ . W ^ ?
**• ^'W>^ (''> for ^.W>?
The parameter ^ is a small negative number, which marks a transition from the interior penalty equation, Eq.(8.29a), to the extended penalty equation, Eq. (8.29b). It is advisable to choose ^ in a way that provides a positive slope for the pseudo-cost function r(x,rp) at the constraint boundary. Further, it is recommended that ^be defined by: g = Cr;
(8.30)
PARAMETER EVALUATION IN METAL FORMING
266 where C is a constant and a varies between 0.33 and 0.66. To begin the optimization, a value of g in the range -0.3 < ^< -0.1 is chosen. Moreover, the initial Vp is determined, so that the two terms in Eq. (8.27) are equal [0(x) = r^ P(x)]. This defines an appropriate value for C in Eq. (8.30). At the beginning of each unconstrained optimization, g is calculated from Eq. (8.30) and remains constant throughout the unconstrained minimization. 8.3
CASE STUDIES
The problem of evaluation of rheological parameters in the cold forming processes is reasonably simple. The yield stress at room temperatures can be assumed to be insensitive to the strain rate. In consequence, constitutive equations contain two or at most, three coefficients which must be evaluated. The situation is more complex in hot forming processes. Evaluation of rheological parameters for hot deformation of metals requires accounting for a large number of tests, which are performed at various temperatures and strain rates. As well, as shown in Chapter 3, the constitutive equations for hot deformation of steels may contain a low of four to a high of seven coefficients in the vector x of Eq. (8.4). The initial estimate for this vector is difficult to establish and it may happen that the starting point is located far from the minimum. These cause the optimization procedure to involve a large number of simulations of the tests. Applying the finite-element technique from the beginning of the optimization would lead to very long computing times and would make the procedure quite inefficient. Therefore, a two-stage approach to this problem is proposed. First, optimization should be performed without the finite-element model, assuming that the stress measured in the test is equal to the flow stress of the material. The results of this solution are then used as a starting point for the final optimization, which uses the finite-element technique and which accounts for all inhomogeneities in the test. Two examples of the application of the inverse analysis to the evaluation of the rheological parameters at hot forming temperatures are described below. One involves plane strain compression tests for aluminum alloys and the second concerns axisymmetric tests for carbonmanganese and niobium microalloyed steels. 8.3.1
Evaluation of rheological parameters for hot forming of aluminum
The objective of the inverse analysis is the estimation of the rheological parameters for an aluminum alloy, using the results of plane strain compression tests, carried out at various temperatures and strain rates. A detailed description of the experimental procedure and the results of the analysis are given by Pietrzyk and Tibbals, (1995). Two sets of the experiments have been used. Both were carried out at temperatures of 350''C, 420°C and 500**C and at strain rates of 0.1 s'\ 1 s'^ and 10 s'^ The initial thickness of the aluminum alloy samples was 10 mm. The widths of the platens and of the sample were different in each of the two sets of tests, 15 mm and 40 mm in the first set of tests, and 5 mm and 17.5 mm in the second set, for the platen and the sample, respectively. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
^
267
Typical registered true stress-true strain curves, obtained at a strain rate of 1 s'^ are presented in Figure 8.2, indicated by the solid, black symbols. The calculated parameters are shown by the empty circles. Analysis of the results shows that different load-displacement relationships were obtained in the two tests. Some softening was observed for the narrow platen and some strain hardening was registered for the wide platen. Moreover, the differences between stresses measured in the two sets of tests for low strains exceeded 30%. a)
b) 350°C
5
100
^^«o*ooOO
ooooooe sco'c )Ooooooooooooeo o o o o o
• experiment o calculaHons 0.0
0.2
0.4
width of the piaten S mm thicl^ness of the sample 10 mm strain rate 1 s' 0.6 Strain
^4»«^«P6TJ c ia
• experiment 0 calculations
wiatM oi the ploler. 15 rprr* thickness cf the -jomple 10 mm strain rote 1 s ' '
0.4 0.6 stroin
Figure 8.2 Measured and predicted stress-strain curves for plane strain compression of aluminum alloy; strain rate 1 s\ width of the platen (a) 5 mm and (b)15 mm
The explanation for these discrepancies can be found in Figure 8.3, where the distributions of strains in the deformation zone are presented. Due to the two axes of symmetry, only a quarter of the deformation zone is shown. The wide platen involves much more uniform distribution of strains than does the narrow platen, caused by the different values of the shape factor of the deformation zone A, defined as the height-to-width ratio of the deforming sample. This ratio equals 0.66 for the wide platen and two for the narrow platen. It is well known (Backofen, 1972) that the plane strain compression stress depends strongly on the value of A. For large shape coefficients, this stress can significantly exceed the yield stress of the material. On the other hand, the influence of friction on the compression stress is larger for low values of A. Both tests were expected to yield the same stress-strain relationship for the material. In order to obtain that relationship, the inverse analysis was applied. The following constitutive equation was assumed:
a,=4l + B£''>'exp|^-|;j
(8.31)
where e is the strain, s is the strain rate and Tis the absolute temperature. The cost function (8.4) with x = {A, B,p, q, Qf was used in the optimization. The vector of measured loads included several pointsfi"omeach experimental curve. Monte Carlo and simplex non-gradient methods were used in the optimization. The analysis, based on the two PARAMETER EVALUATION IN METAL FORMING
268 sets of tests yielded the following values of the variables: .4 = 1.181 MPa, J5 = 0.174, /? = 0.21, ^ = 0.12, g = 22080 J/mole. The resuhs of the finite-element simulation, using the constitutive equation (8.31) with the optimum coefficients, are shown in Figure 8.2 using the blank points. The constitutive equation thus determined shows very good agreement between the measured and calculated compression loads. Pietrzyk and Tibbals, (1995) present the full set of results, as well as an application of other constitutive models, based on the dislocation density.
Figure 8.3 Distributions of strains after plane strain compression; (a) width of the platen 15 mm and (b) 5 mm
8.3.2
Evaluation of rheological parameters for hot forming of steel
Kusiak et al., (1995) used the inverse technique for the evaluation of rheological coefficients using carbon-manganese and niobium steels. The mathematical model, which they applied in their work, is composed of two parts. The first is the thermal-mechanical finite-element program, described in Chapter 5. This program is used to simulate metal flow and heat transfer during hot compression of axisymmetrical samples. The program also calculates compression loads. The second component of the model contains the optimization procedures, which were used in the inverse analysis of the problem. The objective function was defined as the difference between the measured and calculated loads during the tests, according to Eq. (8.4). As discussed in Chapter 3, the behavior of steels during hot plastic deformation is determined by the combined influence of athermal strain hardening, thermally activated recovery and thermally activated recrystallization (Mecking and Kocks, 1981). These three phenomena lead to the characteristic shape of the stress-strain curves, with a plateau (Kuziak, 1997). Depending on the temperature and the strain rate, the curves may exhibit a state of saturation, one peak or oscillations. The type of curve depends on the history of deformation conditions and it is very difificuh to find a reasonably simple function, which describes all possible types of behavior. In what follows, the hyperbolic sine rate equation, Eq. (3.24), is employed. Two sets of experimental data are considered for testing the inverse analysis. The first, published by Laasraoui and Jonas, (1991), includes hot compression of axisymmetrical low carbon steel (0.03%C, 1.54%Mn) samples. The second was perJFormed in the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada. It involved hot compression of axially symmetrical samples, made of a miMATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
269^ croalloyed steel, containing 0.043%C, 1.43%Mn, 0.312%Si and 0.075%Nb. The 8 mm diameter specimens of 12 mm height were compressed to a true strain of 1.1, at a temperature range of 860 - lOOOT, and at constant rates of strain, varying from 0.0001 to 0.1 s\ Results of both experiments show that, at some test conditions, the dynamic recrystallization leads to the characteristic shape of the stress-strain curve, with the stress reaching a peak at some strain and decreasing after that to a steady state value. Table 8.2 Coefficients in stress-strain equations (3.24), (8.32), and (8.33) obtained for various conditions figure steel eq. K AxlO'^^ A3 A4 m « Q MPa s kJ/mole 8.4 C-Mn (3.24) 355.3 171 1.87 0.393 0.086 8.5 Nb 306.8 (3.24) 156 2.62 0.138 0.108 8.6 C-Mn (8.32) 374.3 167 2.0 1.858 0.573 0.218 8.7 C-Mn (8.33) 0.171 372.7 114 0.212 3.46 1.25 0.26 8.8 275.8 Nb 233 3.13 0.729 0.089 0.081 0.159 (8-33) Application of the inverse technique to the experimental data of Laasraoui and Jonas, (1991) leads to the activation energy in the Zener-Hollomon parameter Q = 329600 J/mole and the constants, given in Table 8.2. The resuhs presented by Kusiak et al, (1995) show clearly that equation (3.24) cannot properly describe the stress-strain relationship when dynamic recrystallization is involved. In order to find the equation which accurately describes the strain hardening itself, compression to the strain below the peak value was considered. An inverse technique resulted in the values of the material constants given in thefirstrow of Table 8.2. Comparison of the measured and calculated stress-strain curves below the strain of 0.25 is shown in Figure 8.4.
a)
b)
200
• • • measurements o • A calculations
200-1 • • • measurements o D A calculations
160
160
I 120
Q. 120
80
80
40
40 strain rate 0.2 s-i 1 —r 0.2 0.1 strain
0.0
0.3
strain rate 2 s-i —1 0.1
0.0
r^ 0.2 strain
0.3
Figure 8.4 Stress-strain curves for C-Mn steel obtained from the inverse analysis for function (3.24) below the strain 0.25 compared with the measurements by Laasraoui and Jonas, (1991); strain rate (a) 0.2 s'^ and (b) 2 s'^ PARAMETER EVALUATION IN METAL FORMING
_ —
270
Similar analysis was performed using the niobium steel and the optimum parameters are given in the secx)nd row of Table 8.2. Figure 8.5 shows the resulting comparison of the measured and calculated compression loads. It can be concluded at this stage that Eq. (3.24) properly describes the strain hardening of the steel when the influence of dynamic recrystallization is negligible. The equation is adequate for the simulation of a single pass in hot rolling. Multipass rolling, however, often leads to the accumulation of strains and to dynamic recrystallization. Moreover, other processes such as hot forging may involve large local deformation, far beyond the strain at the peak stress. In these cases, simulation of metal flow based on Eq. (3.24) may lead to erroneous results. Therefore, an attempt was made to introduce a stress-strain function, which properly describes the yield stress over a wide range of strains. This aim is accomplished by introducing the strain dependence of g and n (Wang and Lenard, 1994, and Rao et al., 1993), requiring two additional parameters in the optimization procedure. A similar problem is connected with the Voce approach, described by Hodgson and Collinson, (1990). The latter equation has the form of the sum of two terms, which may be inconvenient. A simpler approach introduces an additional exponential term with one constant. The following equation was suggested:
(8.32)
crp=Ke'' sinh "^ \AZf ]exp(- A^s) where e is the strain and Z is the Zener-Hollomon parameter.
b)
160
• • measurements o D calculations
140 120-] 0. 100-j
«
80 H ° strain rate:
60 H 40
temperature SSQoC 0.0
0.1
0.2 strain
0.3
Figure 8.5 Stress-strain curves obtainedfromthe inverse analysis for Eq. (3.24) below the strain of 0.25 compared with the measurements for niobium steel (Kusiak et al., 1995); temperature (a)910^Cand(b)860^C
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
271 The coefficients in Eq. (8.32), determined from the inverse analysis, are given in the third row of Table 8.2. One exponential term in the stress-strain equation leads to the situation presented in Figure 8.6, which is qualitatively incorrect. For larger strains, the theoretical curve tends to zero instead of a saturation steady value. Proper description of the dynamic recrystallization behavior can be obtained by introducing two exponential terms, as suggested by Beynon et al, (1993). The influence of these terms starts above the peak strain:
ap = Ks''sinh-i{AZyllii +
exp[A3R{e'ep)]-exp[AAe'ep)]
140 n
where:
R{e'ep)=0 R\S'8p)=s-ep
(8.33)
fore<ep
120 H
for €>6p Q. 100
(0 In Eq. (8.33) Sp is the strain corresponding strain rate 0.2 s'** 80 to the peak stress. Calculations based on temperature 900<»C Eq. (8.33) lead to the coefficients given in the last two rows of Table 8,2. Comparison 60 measurements] of the measured and calculated stress-strain curves for these coefficients is presented in r-O- calculations 40 Figure 8.7. It can be concluded that the I I 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.2 conventional hyperbolic sine equation, strain multiplied by an expression with two exponential terms, allows the simulation of the Figure 8.6 Stress-strain curves obtained from the behavior of the materials beyond the start inverse analysis for Eq. (8.32) compared with of dynamic recrystallization. It is pointed out, however, that closed form relationships the measurements by Laasraoui and Jonas (1991); temperature 900°C, strain rate 0.2 s"* of the type of Eq. (8.33) cannot describe stress-strain conditions in general. Recapitulating the work described in this section, it is concluded that combining the inverse technique with the optimization procedures allows the determination of the coefficients in the stress-strain equation, which give the best correlation between measured and calculated loads during compression. The method accounts for the influence of the deformation heating and friction on the test with no explicit need to determine the coefficient of friction or thefrictionfactor. The importance of these phenomena and the errors resulting if they are not accounted for are well-known. The choice of the optimization technique has also been shown to be important. Since they do not require the calculation of derivatives of the objective function, the non-gradient methods are preferable. In the present work, the Monte Carlo method was used at the beginning of the search to localize the minimum. The purpose was to avoidfindingthe local minima, which may appear,
PARAMETER EVALUATION IN METAL FORMING
_^
272
in particular when functions with larger numbers of coefficients are used. The simplex method was used at thefinalstage of the search tofindthe precise solution.
a)
b) 160
• • measurements o D calculations
160
• • • measurements o D A calculations
140 H
140 H
120
120 Q.
100 100
80 H
^/^ strain rate:
60 40 H
-
0.1 s-1
-
0.01 s-1
n nri'i e-i temperature 91 O^C U.UUl S ' J m n i 1 — 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 Strain A
20
[ 0.0
Figure 8.7 Stress-strain curves obtainedfi-omthe inverse analysis for function (8.33) compared with the measurements: a) C-Mn steel, strain rate 0.2 s'^; b) niobium steel, temperature 910''C.
8, J. 2.1 Concluding remarks The case studies presented above show an application of thefinite-elementtechnique to the interpretation of compression tests. Thefinite-elementanalysis predicts the distributions of strain rates, strains and temperatures in the deformation zone, and accounts for the influence of deformation heating and friction on the stress-strain relationship. The optimization technique with the cost function (8.4) leads to the local strain-hardening relationship. The accuracy of the method depends on the selection of the function describing the stressstrain curve. It is shown that the commonly used sine hyperbolic function (3.24) or the Arrhenius type function (8.31) properly describe the strain hardening only below the peak strain. These functions fail, however, when dynamic recrystallization becomes a dominant factor affecting the flow stress. Introduction of the additional exponential terms allows for the accounting of the dynamic recrystallization. The efficiency of the inverse technique can be understood in two ways. Since the method requires the running of thefinite-elementcode for each experiment available at each iteration during the optimization, it is time consuming. On the other hand, the starting point for optimization is takenfi-omthe direct approximation of the experimental curves and is usually close to the solution. The aim of the inverse technique is only to introduce changes in the coefficients, which account for the influence of friction and heat generation. These changes are small and often, only a few iterations are required tofindthe solution. MATHEMAHCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
8.3.3
Estimation of the parameters in microstructural equations
The general idea of this approach is based on the fact that an inverse analysis may use the measurements of various process parameters together. Thus, it can be applied to the evaluation of material constants in the models of different but mutually dependent phenomena, such as flow stress and microstructure evolution. The general objective of the present section is to apply the inverse technique to the evaluation of the material constants in both the constitutive equation and the microstructure evolution model. Experiment: The idea of the test design is to create as large an inhomogeneity of deformation, as possible. The cylindrical samples measuring 12 mm in height and 8 mm in diameter were compressed in two ways. First was a typical upsetting of axisymmetrical samples. In the second set of tests, the samples were put on their sides and compressed along the diameter, as shown schematically in Figure 8.8. The latter method yielded large inhomogeneity of deformation, with strains varying from zero close to the side of the sample to a maximum at the center. The compression force was monitored during each test. The samples were quenched directly following the deformation and the grain size was measured at several locations on the cross-section. The recrystallized volume fraction was evaluated based on the measurement of recrystallized and non-recrystallized grains. The tested material was carbon-manganese steel containing 0.16%C and 1.3%Mn. The average austenite grain size after preheating was 44 inm but the microstructure was inhomogeneous. Some large grains were observed in the samples quenched after preheating. The parameters of all the tests are given in Table 8.3 where Tp is the preheat temperature, Tt is the test temperature, r is the reduction, and e is the strain rate. The model is based on coupling of the advanced finite-element approach (see Chapter 5) simulating metal flow and heat transfer during hot compression with the conventional equations describing microstructural phenomena for steels. The hyperbolic sine yield stress equation, Eq. (3.24), was used in the constitutive model. The Voce approach (Hodgson and CoUinson, 1990) was added to account for dynamic recrystallization. Microstructure evolution models used in this section include the semi-empirical closed form equations given in Tables 6.4 and 6.5. The kinetics of recrystallization is calculated from Eq. (6.2) with the coefficients suggested by Sellars, (1990). This is combined with the recrystallized grain size equations by Sellars and Whiteman, (1979), given in Table 6.5, Roberts et al., (1983), from Table 6.2, Choquet et al., (1990) and Hodgson and Gibbs, (1992), from Table 6.2. The possibility of dynamic recrystallization is considered, as well. The equations describing the critical strain and the grain size after dynamic and metadynamic recrystallization, which were used in the present work, are given in Tables 6.7 and 6.9. The coefficients in these equations are determined from experiments using inverse analysis. Parameter evaluation: The resuhs of the experiments are used to determine the coefficients in the flow stress and microstructure evolution equations, achieved by minimizing the error norm, defined as the sum of the differences between the measured and calculated compression force and the recrystallized volume fraction in all experiments:
,\ 2
Fr
/
\2
1^
+-Z
x:
PARAMETER EVALUATION IN METAL FORMING
(8.34)
274 where i^^F^'" are the calculated and measured force, respectively, n is the number of force sampling points, X^.X"^ are the calculated and measured recrystallized volume fractions, respectively, and k is the number of points at which the recrystallization volume fraction was measured. The optimization procedure yields the values of the coefficients p, q and A in the flow stress equation as well as coefficients B in the dynamic recrystallization equations. Since the sensitivities of the cost fiinction O with respect to the parameters A could not be calculated analytically, the non-gradient optimization techniques were applied. There is no direct noticeable correlation between the flow stress and the recrystallized grain size. The parameters in the equations describing the grain size were therefore determined separately using the cost function:
(8.35)
^ 2 = .
where D^^DJ" are the calculated and measured recrystallized grain sizes, respectively, and / is the number of points at which the grain size was measured. Table 8.3 Parameters of experiments 8
no. X
Figure 8.8 Schematic illustration of the sideways compression test
mm
s'^
upsetting of cylindrical samples 1 1095 0.1 850 4.2 2.0 4.7 2 1100 850 3 1068 885 0.1 5.2 2.0 4.9 4 1089 910 0.1 4.8 5 1130 959 2.0 4.8 6 1100 955 5.0 7 1087 1047 0.1 compression of samples lying on sides 4.2 0.1 860 8 1093 2.5 2.0 9 1130 870 3.2 0.1 10 1090 909 2.7 2.0 11 1080 912 3.3 0.1 953 12 1063 3.6 2.0 13 1043 960 3.3 0.1 14 1102 1040
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
275
The finite-element method supplies information regarding the distributions of strain rates, strains, stresses and temperatures in the deformation zone. This is further used in the inverse analysis, according to the flow chart, presented in Figure 8.1. Typical results obtained from the finite-element simulation for the sideways compressed samples are shown in Figure 8.9. The mesh, used in these calculations, is presented in Figure 8.10, showing a quarter of the deformation zone. Significant inhomogeneity of deformation is observed in Figure 8.9. The inverse technique is designed to handle this inhomogeneity. The recrystallized volume fi-action and grain size measurements were performed at several locations on the cross-section of the sample. These were combined with local values of the process parameters, calculated by the finite-element model. In consequence, one sample supplied information, which in a conventional experimental technique, would necessitate the running of a number of tests.
a)
b) strain rate 0.1 s'^
strain rate 0.1"
Figure 8.9 Effective strain distribution (a) and temperature distribution (b) after sideways compression of cylinder; test 8 in Table 8.3
Typical results of measurements for the upsetting of cylindrical samples are shown in Figure 8.11. These results, together with similar data for the sideways compression, were used in the inverse analysis. Optimization of fiinction Oi yielded the following values of coefficients in Eq. (3.24): iT = 98, ^ = 2x10'^^ m = 0.25, w = 0.2. The dynamic recrystallization coefficients in Table 6.7 are: A = 6x10"^ q = Q3p = 0.17 and in Table 6.9, A = 1.8xlO^ p = 0.15, &i?Ar= 310000 J/mole. The results obtained from the inverse analysis were tested against the experimental data, not used in the optimization. The results for the upsetting of a cylinder are shown in Figure 8,12 and for the sideways compression in Figure 8.13. The second part of the analysis included the identification of the recrystallized grain size models. Detailed description of this part is given by Pietrzyk et al., (1997). Briefly, the inverse analysis yielded the values of the coefficients in the microstructure evolution equations, which give the minimum of the cost function (8.35). These coefficients are presented in Table 8.4 where they are compared with those given in original publications (numbers in parenthesis). Sellars and Whiteman's, (1979), equation is considered here in the following general form:
Dr=C,
Cjln
7 Y no.5 10-^9 Z e m
PARAMETER EVALUA TION IN METAL FORMING
(8.36)
276 where D is the grain size prior to deformation, e is the strain and Z is the Zener-HoUomon parameter. The activation energy in this is identified by Qd. The symbols in the remaining three investigated equations are as in Table 6.2. Table 8.4 shows that the differences between the coefficients in the microstructure evolution models, determined from the inverse analysis, and those given in the original publications, are small. Pietrzyk et al., (1997) also demonstrated that using the four equations with the coefficients determined from the inverse analysis yields results that are more consistent than when using the original coefficients. In the latter situation, the discrepancies between the results obtained from various models are larger. Therefore, the inverse technique can be recommended as an efficient and accurate method for the interpretation of tests in the evaluation of the microstructure evolution models.
120o
90(0 Q.
^,^.-"^--—....,^,^^,,^^,^ 0)
30-
850OC
4"
8850C
b a
0 ]
r
0.0
Figure 8.10 Finite element mesh for sideways compression (a quarter of the cross section is considered)
O
1
0.1
•
9590c
A
10470c 1
1
1
1
0.2
0.3 strain
0.4
0.5
Figure 8.11 Measured stress-strain curves in upsetting
Table 8.4 Coefficients in the equations in Tables 6.2 and 6.5 obtained from the inverse analysis. Hodgson and source Sellars and Choquet et al, Roberts et al., Whiteman (1990) Gibbs (1992) (1983) (1979) Ci 25.4(25) 6.9(6.2) C2 15.2(14.9) 375(343) 36(45) 56.9(55.7) m 8.7(8.5) -0.55(-0.6) -0.57(-0.6) -0.72(-0.65) n -0.65(-0.67) -0.07(-0.1) / 0.36(0.4) 0.68(0.374) 0.56(0.5) &,kJ/mole 312(312) 49(45) 38(38) 46(35) MA THEMA 77CAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
0.6
^
277
The equations with coefficients in Table 8.4 have been used in the simulation of the tests, not used in the optimization procedure. Figure 8.14 shows a typical calculated distribution of the austenite grain size and recrystallized volume fraction, compared with the results of measurements for the sideways compression. Metallography shows that dynamic recrystallization began in the center of the sample in all slow tests, an observation that was confirmed by theoretical analysis. Due to the large inhomogeneity of deformation in this process, the distribution of the grain size in the volume of the sample is complex (Figure 8.14a). Figure 8.14b indicates that in the areas where recrystallization is completed or there is no recrystallization, the measured and predicted grain sizes coincide perfectly. In the areas of partial recrystallization, the predicted grain size is a weighted average of non-recrystallized and recrystallized grains and it agrees well with the measured grain size.
temperature 850°c
Sideways compression 2 0 - temperature 860oc
7 ^
f
V °
15-
OJ/JI
ojgjip 10measurement, 2 s-^ —
measurement, 0.1 s-^
—
prediction, 2 s-""
• R — prediction, 0.1 s 1 T 2 3 4 reduction, mm
5-
1^^—
measurement, 860°C
—H~
measurement, 909°C
O 6
Figure 8.12 Measured and calculated compression forces for upsetting of cylinders, tests 1 and 2 in Table 8.3
0 -1F
1
prediction, 860°c
n prediction, 909°C T i l l 2 3 reduction, mm
Figure 8.13 Measured and calculated compression forces for sideways compression, tests 8 and 10 in Table 8.3
Similar results have been obtained for other tests in Table 8.3 and the agreement between the measurements and the calculations was very good. The analysis of all results showed that the inverse technique is capable of evaluating the coefficients A, describing recrystallized grain size in Table 6.4 and Table 6.5, and the coefficients B, in the equations describing dynamic recrystallization in Table 6.6. Coefficients B are very close to those suggested by Sellars, (1990). Application of the inverse analysis to the interpretation of plastometric tests presents numerous advantages. For example, no effort is to be spent on avoiding inhomogeneity of deformation. On the other hand, the nonuniform tests supply much more information than the tests with uniform deformation. One set of compression tests allows the determination of the coefficients in both equations describing the flow stress and the kinetics of recrystallization. PARAMETER EVALUATION IN METAL FORMING
278 using the cost function 0)1. The same set of tests allows the determination of the coefficients in the recrystallized grain size models using the cost function
a)
b) strain rate 2 s""*
strain rate 2 s'^
Figure 8.14 Measured (bold face numbers) and calculated (isolines) austenite grain size (a) and recrystallized volume fraction (b) for test 11 in Table 8.3, at a strain rate of 2 s'*
MA THEMA TJCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
279
Chapter 9 Knowledge Based Modeling Chapters 1-8 show that mathematical and physical models are able to give a reasonably accurate description of the domain in the rolling process. The distributions of the stresses, strains, strain rates, temperatures, etc. in the billet in the roll gap, using models of various complexities, can be determined well, provided care is taken in the mathematical description of the physical phenomena. The models' accuracy and consistency also depend, of course, on the rigor of the description of the boundary and initial conditions. The models describing the entire rolling process must contain certain assumptions, necessary because of the extreme complexity of the process, which unavoidably, introduce errors. The use of less restrictive and less arbitrary assumptions would, of course, lessen but not eliminate the discrepancies and would increase the quality of the predictions. Further attempts to overcome or minimize these errors further are the objectives o^ knowledge based modeling. The major concern in this process is the closed logical loop in the technological design, since every technological operation can and will influence the quality of the product. Technology affects the material properties that further influence the geometry that determines the design of the technology. Disciplines of mechanics and kinetics cannot easily handle the problems of friction, wear, fracture, metallurgical phenomena, and heat loss and gain in multistage processes. Modeling such sophisticated phenomena needs new approaches. For process planning, measured and predicted data are also necessary. The on-line data acquisition systems, used in modem mills, can follow only the local changes, and can control the process according to a limited closed-loop system. The control unit cannot predict the occurrence of and the reasons for some defects, because the reasons are outside of the scope of the data acquisition systems. Knowledge processing, using methods of artificial intelligence (AI), opens novel ways in the "efficient use of deficient knowledge" (Hatvany and Lettner, 1983). A survey of knowledge-based methods in metal forming in 1992 (Cser, 1991, 1992) contained less than 200 publications. The growing interest in these methods is shown by Korhonen et al., (1998), which contains 50 reference items about only one AI method, artificial neural networks in rolling.
9.1
KNOWLEDGE IN HOT ROLLING
The factors influencing the microstructure and thus the properties, of the hot rolled strip involve the entire forming system, including the rolling mills, frames, work rolls, back-up rolls, transfer tables, cooling devices, descalers, etc., even if the exact effect of a particular component on the parameters and variables of the process is not immediately known or cannot yet, be quantified. It is convenient to divide the components and the phenomena into two subsections: those concerning the rolling mills, referred to as the "in-stand" events and those that are between stands, called "inter-stand" events. This approach, separating the issues at
280 and between the stands enables the description of different rolling trains, containing dififerent numbers of roughing and finishing stands. These phenomena are not independent of each other. In fact, they possess a very complex confluence. For example, when having changed the temperature, not only the roll force changes, but the torque, the surface phenomena, as well as the boundary conditions, among others, are all affected. The same is valid for the geometrical parameters, such as the thickness, profile, flatness, width and the surface roughness. In order to predict the expected quality of the strip or plate, detailed analyses of all these factors are necessary. As the first step the task is to: collect all necessary data from the industry, research and literature; store the data and their interconnections - the knowledge; and find similar cases, where the results can be transferred from the known case to the new, unknown one.
9.2
KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION
The most difficult task in developing a knowledge-based application is knowledge acquisition. The definition of knowledge acquisition, according to the Concise Oxford Dictionary (1995) is as follows: "The process of acquiring knowledge from a human expert for an expert system, which must he carefully organized into IF-THEN rules or some other form of knowledge representation." Techniques of knowledge acquisition include: •
•
knowledge collection from the human experts; and on-line data collection with additional learning and knowledge extraction.
As the name suggests, the first method of acquiring knowledge attempts to collect and code the experience of the processes' users. The main disadvantage of the technique is that a third person, the so-called knowledge engineer is included. The knowledge engineer is familiar with the methods of knowledge processing and with the formal syntax and semantics of knowledge, but not with the specific topics or processes; in this instance, with the technology of hot and subsequent cold rolling. The advantage of this method is the ability of the human expert to give an explanation of the decisions which can also be included in a rule-based expert system. However, the expectations of collecting and storing the knowledge, drawn fi-om the lifelong experience of industrial experts and included in a Knowledge Based Expert System have not achieved the necessary results. The task of sharing between the "experts" and the "knowledge engineer" led to results of low practical value, see Figure 9.1. The maintenance of knowledge, that is, adding new rules or actualizing the old ones, causes diflScuIties in the expert systems. The second approach is very effective in the case of on-line measurement systems, but additional knowledge extraction from the collected data is necessary. The knowledge base, MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
28j_ built using this approach, embodies the knowledge in an implicit form, and so does not possess the ability to explain the decisions to the user.
Machine
Knowledge engineer
Knowledge acquisition & maintenance
MacliJf»«
11 Knowledge 3ase
11
00
Knowledge Base
DB Teaching
Using
Figure 9.1 The knowledge engineer and the user
9.2.1
Collecting knowledge from experts
The "classical" method of knowledge processing, used in different theorem proving systems, is the rule-based cq)proach with ifA^B^.
thenC
type rules, mentioned in the previous definition. The "left part" of the rule (here A ^ B '^ ...) describes the premise, the "right-hand part" the actton (here C). A complete rule, describing for example, the reduction necessary to initiate dynamic recrystallization of a microalloyed steel, containing 0.03% Nb, in a roughing mill within a 3 s inter-pass time may be • • •
if the Nb content is 0.03; and the grain size is 80 ^im; then the necessary reduction is 25%;
• • •
if the Nb content is 0.03; and the grain size is 250 nm; then the necessary reduction is 75%.
Using the rules an Expert System can give a good answer to the question, matching fiiUy the statement in the premise of the rule. It can also explain the reason of a decision answering the question: KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
282 Why has 25% reduction been choosen? However, no answer can be found, if the grain size is between 80 and 250 |im, say 150 ^m. The knowledge used above is a typical example of declarative knowledge representation. Declarative knowledge is stored as a set of statements about the phenomenon to be described. These statements are static but can be added to, deleted or modified. Note that there are some other types of knowledge representation, such as procedural, symbolic, subsymbolic, etc. Rule-based systems separate the declarative knowledge from the code that controls the inference and search procedures. The declarative knowledge is stored in a knowledge base (KB) while the control knowledge is kept in a separate area called an inference engine. An inference engine is an algorithm that dynamically directs or controls the system when it searches its knowledge base (Harmon and Hall, 1993). The inference engine matches the domains of the premise part in the rules, stored in the knowledge base, with the action parts building up logical chains forward or backward {forward chaining, or backward chaining), depending on the task (Harmon and King, 1985, Buchanan et al., 1985). Forward chaining is a method that finds every conclusion possible based on a given set of premises. A typical question to be answered using forward chaining is: What happens, if..? Forward chaining is used primarily for the prediction of events, where all possible outcomes based on a given input are under consideration. For all other purposes forward chaining is only feasible when the number of possible outcomes is small. When there exists the probability of too many conclusions, forward chaining becomes too inefficient and time consuming to be of any practical use. When the number of possible outcomes is large, one may choose backward chaining. In backward chaining, one starts with the desired goal, and then attempts to find evidence to justify that goal. A typical question is: What was the reason for... 7 Backward chaining is useful in situations where the quantity of data is very large and where some specific characteristics of the system under consideration are of interest. Typical situations are various problems of diagnosis, such as fault finding in the rolling process based on product quality, when asking the question: what was the reason for the lack of consistent geometry of the product? The rule-based expert systems do not possess true learning capability. They are unable to adjust their expertise to take into account their earlier errors or new situations. Once a system has been installed, it is important to continue the development and extension of the knowledge base. New knowledge gained during the implementation or test period may necessitate modification with the deletion of certain rules or the addition of new features. These operations can be error-prone because of the "spaghetti rule", indicating that when one rule implies another, the modification can destroy the entire structure of the rules. Thus, checking the influence of the modification on every situation becomes necessary. The MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
283 modifications can result in closed logical loops in the inference, as demonstrated formally by the logical if-statements: if A then B,
if B then C, ifCthen A. 9.2.2
Storing the knowledge
Knowledge for an Expert System is stored in a knowledge base (KB), incorporating the knowledge acquired from human experts. The rules can be verbal, making storage and supervision extremely difficult. One solution to overcome this difficulty is the structuring of the rules. Using structured rules the entire knowledge base becomes more compact. In the example above, separating the rules corresponding to different types of steel provides a clearer, better organized structure. Much better results have been achieved in decision-making by using the object-oriented knowledge representation. In such systems, efficient knowledge retrieval can be combined with easy knowledge maintenance (e.g. adding new knowledge to the system), where the syntax of the knowledge corresponds to the structure of the real world. In the case of metal forming tasks, factors that influence the process - the entire forming system - should be described as sets of objects connected with each other and having their own proper attributes. The so-called ^owe^ give the formal description of the knowledge containing the properties of the object in their slots. Slots can be identified by their names and in complex cases, they can ht frames themselves. Characteristic of object-oriented knowledge representation is that it separates the concrete attributes from their relations. The relations - the inside connections of different objects - are described by the generic frame. This empty frame describes the possible connections. The stored cases are the instances in the generic frame. In many cases the value to be estimated (e.g. grain size in hot rolling, or tool life in cold forging) is a result of the confluence of many factors. These factors, practically the entire forming system, are stored in the generic frame. All data extracted from the literature, collected from the industry, as well as simulated or measured in laboratory experiments can form parts of the knowledge base. However, sets of data are mostly incomplete, and some slots remain empty. In these cases, the empty slots can befilledwith default values from similar cases. An advantage of the object-oriented knowledge representation is its ability to define classes with partially common attributes, as well as to inherit the attributes. All members of the class of HSLA steels inherit the properties of the micro-alloyed steels, and it is enough to define a steel as belonging to this class. It is not necessary to define common attributes for them. The greatest advantage of the object-oriented approach is that it supports analogy building. This approach corresponds to human thinking. The basis of the expert's decision is mostly a "similar" case from his former experience and the analysis of differences. The difference between the thinking of the human expert and the Expert System is that the human expert can decide, from his or her own previous experience, whether a difference in one of the compared values is KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
284
essential or not. (e.g., difference of 0.01 % in carbon content is not as important as 0.01 % of boron, or niobium). The most important and troublesome part of the software work is connected not with the kernel part of the system incorporating the technical intelligence or with the development of the knowledge base, but with the formalization of the knowledge. However, the software market offers different tools, making the development of expert systems easier. A shell is a program that facilitates the development of expert systems. A good shell is a complete development environment for building and maintaining knowledge-based applications. It provides a systematic methodology for knowledge engineering that allows the domain experts themselves to be directly involved in structuring and encoding the knowledge. (The direct involvement of the domain expert improves the quality, completeness and accuracy of acquired knowledge, lowers the development and maintenance costs and increases their control over the form of the software application.) Features include: a structured approach to knowledge acquisition; a model of knowledge acquisition based on pattern recognition; knowledge represented as objects, production rules and decision tables; handling uncertainty by qualitative, non-numerical procedures; extremely thorough knowledge bases; sophisticated report writing facilities; and self documenting knowledge bases in a hypertext environment (for example, ACQUIRE).
9.3
NUMERICAL DATA FOR DECISION-MAKING
The easiest way to represent knowledge is when the knowledge domains are expressed in explicit form. These are the rules shown above. A very high grade of abstraction is necessary to formulate a rule. During the knowledge acquisition the expert and the knowledge engineer try to formulate the rules. These general rules are mostly "rules of thumb". Sometimes it is extremely difficult to formulate a universally valid rule, because of the large amount of premises and the difficulties in the general abstraction. Some subjective or emotional issues can also appear, and it is likely that another expert may formulate a totally different set of rules for the same case. The bases of all abstractions formulated in the rules are the many years of experience, and the professional background of the human expert. The experience is gained from the cases met by the expert during the entire professional career. Another possible approach is based on trying to collect as many case studies as possible. Having collected a large number of cases, the professional background of the human expert^ as well as the general rules of the professional area, appear as a smaller number of rules, bridging the gap between known cases and new situations. Such a process of knowledge acquisition is called case based learning. A special type of program can also be used to allow the deduction of the rules. The human expert's task is then only to supervise the learning process and correct the conclusions, a form of supervised learning. The main problem in the process of case based learning, following the formal logic of human thinking, is in finding analogies and differences. A human expert, possessing personal experience and knowledge of the process, can evaluate the situation, and decide whether it is similar to one from the past, or whether it is generally new. To find two cases with the same MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
2^ set of numerical data about the whole forming system is practically impossible. Once an input/output map has been constmcted, linking certain inputs to certain outputs, even very small differences may introduce difficulties. 9.3.1
Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic
The methodology that permits more flexible mapping, and thus the finding of analogies in the cases is fuzzy logic. Fuzzy logic is a superset of conventional (Boolean) logic that has been extended to handle the concept of partial truth - truth values between "completely true" and "completely false" (Meech, 1995). Fuzzy Systems are Expert Systems that use fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic to perform qualitative modeling and/or to control processes when no model has yet been identified or developedfi-omfundamental principles. Fuzzy logic is concerned with the reasoning about "Fuzzy" events or concepts. Examples of fiizzy concepts are "temperature is high" and "C-content is low". When is a rolling temperature high? If the threshold of the high temperature is defined as lOOO'^C, the implication is that a rolling temperature of 998°C is not high. When humans reason with terms such as "high" they do not normally have a fixed threshold in mind, but a smooth, fuzzy definition. Humans can reason very effectively with such fuzzy definitions; therefore, in order to capture human fuzzy reasoning fuzzy logic is needed. An example of a fiizzy rule that involves a fiizzy premise and a fuzzy conclusion is: IF 77 content is high TBEN precipitation hardening is very high. The fuzzy value high designates the range of numerical values from 0.20% to 0.25% in the content of Ti. The term very high indicates that precipitation hardening is present and it is contributing 17 MPa to the material's strength for each 0.01% of Ti. Fuzzy reasoning involves three steps: • • •
fuzzification of the terms that appear in the premises of rules; inference from fiizzy rules; and de-flizzification of the fuzzy terms that appear in the conclusions of rules.
Transformation of an objective term into a fuzzy concept is called fuzzification. Fuzzification is a method of modeling human imprecise reasoning using fuzzy sets. Using this technique, the concept high is related to the underlying objective term, which it is attempting to describe; namely the actual Ti content in %. The transformation of an objective term into a fuzzy concept is called fuzzification. The degree to which the statement: 0.20% Ti is high (x is in F) is true is determined by finding the ordered pair whose first element is x. The degree of truth of the statement is the second element of the ordered pair. But 0.18 % Ti also is high with a degree of truth lower than the 0.20%. Just as there is a strong relationship between Boolean logic and the concept of a subset, there is a similarly strong relationship between fuzzy logic and fiizzy subset theory. KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
286^ In classical set theory, a subset U of a set S can be defined as a mapping from the elements of S to the elements of the set {0, 1}: U:S-^{OA}
(9.1)
This mapping may be represented as a set of ordered pairs, with exactly one ordered pair present for each element of S. The first element of the ordered pair is an element of the set S, and the second element is an element of the set {0, 1}. The value zero is used to represent non-membership, and the value one is used to represent membership. The truth or falsity of the statement: X is in U
(9.2)
is determined by finding the ordered pair whose first element is x. The statement is true if the second element of the ordered pair is 1, and the statement is false if it is 0. Similarly, a fuzzy subset F of a set S can be defined as a set of ordered pairs, each with the first element from S, and the second element from the interval [0,1] with exactly one ordered pair present for each element of S. This defines a mapping between elements of the set S and values in the interval [0,1]. The value zero is used to represent complete non-membership, the value one is used to represent complete membership, and the values in between are used to represent intermediate degrees of membership. The set S is referred to as the universe of discourse for the fuzzy subset F, and the mapping is described as the membership function of F (In practice, the terms membership function &nd fuzzy subset are used interchangeably).
0
0.2
0.25
0.3
TJ(%)
Figure 9.2 Membership function of high in context with Ti in HSLA steels
The real power of fuzzy logic systems, compared to crisp logic systems, lies in their ability to represent a concept using a small number of fuzzy values. This therefore reduces the number of rules required to capture the knowledge relating to that concept. To achieve the same accuracy with crisp logic, a large number of logical values would be required, resulting in a large rule base. Inference from a set of fuzzy rules involves fuzzification of the premises of the rules, and then propagating the membership values (confidence factors) of the premises to the conclusions (outcomes) of the rules. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
^
287 Consider the following rule:
IF initial grain size is medium AND pass reduction is large THEN the re crystallized austenite grain size is small. Inference from this rule involves (using fiizzification) looking up the membership value of the premise '"initial grain size is medimf\ given the initial grain size before the rolling operation, and the membership value of "the pass reduction is large", given the degree of deformation. Fuzzy inference involves having a weight for each rule between 0 and 1, and then multiplying the membership value assigned to the outcome of the rule. By default, each rule weight is set to 1.0. For example, for the initial austenite grain size three categories may be defined: • • •
large. medium small
when the ASTM grain number is < 2; 2-6; >6.
For each category the center of the interval corresponds to the membership value =1, and the middle of the neighboring interval to 0. In a fuzzy rule base a number of rules with the outcome recrystallized austenite grain size is small will be fired. The inference engine will assign the outcome recrystallized austenite grain size is small the maximum membership value from all fired rules. So, the fijzzy inference involves: • • •
de-fuzzification of the premises of each rule and assigning the outcome of each rule the minimum membership value of its premises multiplied by the rule weight; assigning each outcome the maximum membership value from its fired rules; and f^Tzy inference resulting in confidence factors (membership values) assigned to each outcome in the rule base.
If the conclusion of the fiazzy rule set involves fiizzy concepts, these concepts will have to be translated back into objective terms before they can be used in practice. For a rule set including the recrystallized austenite grain size rule described in the previous section, fiizzy inference will result in the terms "'recrystallized austenite grain size is smalT\ "'recrystallized austenite grain size is medium'' and "recrystallized austenite grain size is large'' etc. being assigned membership values. In practice, however, to use the conclusions from a rule base it is necessary to de-fijzzify the conclusions into a crisp recrystallized austenite grain size figure. To do this it is necessary to define the membership fijnctions for the recrystallized austenite grain size outcomes, as shown in Figure 9.3. One method of de-fiizzification is to place the membership fijnctions (confidence factors) generated by inference for each fiizzy outcome at the point where the membership fiinction has its highest value. The required de-fijzzified value can then be calculated as the center of gravity of the membership vectors. This is illustrated in the example below, assuming that fiizzy inference results in membership values of 0.1 for medium, and 0.8 for large. The de-fuzzified value of the recrystallized austenite grain size number is calculated as the center of gravity of the area framed by the bold line. Its ordinate is near 5.8 and this KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
288 corresponds to measured values (Ginzburg, 1989). While the main principles of fuzzy logic are broadly accepted, there are a number of various methods of fiizzy inference and defuzzification.
grain size #
Figure 9.3
9.4
Membership functions for the recrystallized austenite grain size number
DATA AND DATA MINING IN HOT ROLLING
In a modem rolling mill, each device, including the furnace, the mill stands, coilers etc., has its own computer control with sensors. Computers controlling the devices are supervised and are controlled on the next hierarchical level by other computers, co-ordinating the devices and uniting them into a technological unit (e.g. finishing mill). These units have a control system of their own, connected with sensors measuring the process parameters before entering the current unit. The work of the technological units is co-ordinated by the computers on the next hierarchical level, which store all activities of the controlled lower level. The production data and the events during the rolling process are collected and stored by the next higher level of computers. In an average modem hot strip mill, a full temperature map is measured behind the fiimace, before the roughing stand, before the first finishing stand, behind the first finishing stand, before the last finishing stand, and before the coiler, etc. After exit from the last finishing stand, the thickness, profile, width, flatness, and wedge are also measured. At each stand the roll separating force, roll bending force, mill motor power, tension, strip bending, etc. values are measured, and the torque is calculated and stored. Data concerning the surface quality, the grain size or mechanical properties are computed or collected later. 9.4.1
What to do with the sampled data?
The measurements listed above are taken continuously during the passage of each strip or plate. The data-sampling interval is between 0.2-2.0 sec. The temperature is measured, h4A THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
289 preferably over the whole width, before the finishing mill on the top and bottom side of the strip. Millions of data points are collected for each strip, and - depending on the performance thousands of strips are rolled in a particular campaign. Following each pass, averages are recorded and the standard deviations are determined. The rest of the data are often discarded. An interesting situation appears with a flood of data on the workshop level, while the research personnel, trying to predict the product quality, suffers because of the lack of detailed data. The basis of the quality prediction is further dependent on human experience collected in practice. There is a gap between the data and the knowledge. Using the definition of the Concise Oxford Dictionary: "KNOWLEDGE: • knowing, familiarity gained by experience, (of person, thing, fact) • person's range of information • theoretical or practical understanding (of subject, language etc.)". Another classical definition of knowledge states that it is the: "Capacity to solve problems, innovate, or otherwise create value on the basis of previous experiences, skills, or learning." These definitions show the necessity offindingthe hidden dependencies in the measurement information collected on-line, to understand them and to use them properly. In this way the gained knowledge allows the prediction of the quality and leads to explanations of the deviations from the required quality parameters. The term "t/orto mining" is just one of several terms, including knowledge extraction, data archaeology, information harvesting, sift-ware and even data dredging, that actually describe the concept of knowledge discovery in databases. The idea behind data mining, then, is the "non-trivial process of identifying valid, novel, potentially useful, and ultimately understandable patterns in data" (Srikant and Agrawal, 1996). Therefore, data mining is the automated discovery of hidden patterns, cross correlation and trends in large amounts of data, and the knowledge discovery in databases. The task of data mining is the clustering/segmentation of the information: •
•
•
identifying homogeneous and separable groups (clusters), i.e.: maximum similarity within a group, maximum difference between groups, identifying rules of co-occurrence of items, to each rule is associated: confidence level (i.e. probability of occurrence): "if a record contains A and B, then it also contains C with probability p = 0.7" support level (i.e. number of records in the database), identifying recurrent patterns over time: discovery of frequent episodes (i.e. collections of events), association rules through time, induction of prediction models, statistical / neural network models. KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
290
Data mining is closely connected with the machine learning, pattern recognition, databases, statistics, artificial intelligence (AI), and knowledge acquisition for expert systems and data visualization. Many of the techniques and algorithms are derived from these fields. The underlying basis for these fields is the extraction of knowledge or patterns of information from data in the context of large databases. Traditional database queries contrast with data mining since these are typified by simple questions such as What is the width deviation within the strips? Multidimensional analysis enables one to do much more complex queries, such as comparing actual and planned width for different thickness and nominal width categories. Again, the emphasis in both these cases is that the derived results are values, which are an extraction or aggregation of existing data. Data mining, on the other hand, through the use of specific algorithms or "search engines", attempts to source out discernible patterns and trends in the data and infers rulesfi"omthese patterns. With these rules or fiinctions, the user is then able to support, review, and examine decisions. The main steps and methods of the data mining process are as follows: • •
• •
•
•
• •
object definition; data integration: integrating the existing sources of data, merge data fi'om multiple files and databases (usually fi-om different operational environments), resolve semantic ambiguities; data selection: identify relevant variables and ranges among the available data; pre-processing the data: preparing the data, data cleaning, finding the errors or inconsistencies, handle the noise, data scrubbing, mappings and data conversions, deriving new attributes; visual inspection, distribution and significant outliers, statistical analysis (correlation between attribute pairs, higher order correlation between groups of attributes), feature analysis, clustering, discretization of attributes; knowledge discovery: task classes, clustering/segmentation, association, classification, pattern detection/prediction in time-series, evaluating the error rates, model validation, statistical cross-validation, variance analysis of the results; interpreting the results; and integrating the solutions.
Technology of data mining covers the visualization (data visualization, discovery by visualization as well as visualization of discoveries), the discovery algorithms (e.g. decision trees, clustering, neural networks, association rules, sequential patterns), and data warehousing. 9.4.2 Self-organizing maps (SOM) The Self-Organizing Map (SOM) method is a new, powerfiil software tool for the visualization of multi-dimensional data. It converts complex, non-linear statistical relationships MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
291_ among high-dimensional data into simple geometric relationships on a low-dimensional display (Kohonen and Oja, 1996). Similar to other data mining methods, it also applies and incorporates statistical procedures for modeling and handling of noisy data. As it thereby compresses information while preserving the most important topological and metric relationships of the primary data elements on the display, it may also be considered, as a qualitative abstraction. The SOM is a neural network algorithm which is based on unsupervised learning in a datadriven way (Kohonen, 1995). Unlike supervised learning methods, the SOM can be used for clustering data without knowing the class memberships of the input data. Therefore it can be used to detect features inherent to the problem. The SOM has been successfully applied in various engineering applications, as written by Kohonen, et al., (1996) covering, for instance, areas like pattern recognition, image analysis, process monitoring and control, and fault diagnosis (Tryba, et al., 1991; Simula and Kangas, 1995; Simula, et al., 1998). The SOM has also proved to be a valuable tool in data mining and knowledge discovery with applications in full-text and financial data analysis (Kaski, 1997). The essential point in the applicability of SOM is the topological character of the mapping: similar patterns are mapped in the nearby locations on the map. Therefore, it is a method for the visualization of multi-dimensional patterns. The Self-Organizing Map (SOM) is a neural network model. It consists of neurons organized in array. The number of the neurons may vary fi*om a few dozen up to several thousand. Consider a rolling mill from which several measurements are taken, as mentioned above. Denote the measurement vector by:
X={^J„..4/
(9.3)
wherej indicates a measured parameter (e.g. temperature, thickness, flatness, etc.) The SOM consists of a regular, usually two-dimensional, grid of neurons. Each neuron / of the SOM is represented by an n-dimensional weight, or model vector:
where n is equal to the dimension of the input vectors. The scale of each measurement is normalized so that either the maximum and minimum of each §, respectively, are equal, or the variance of every § is the same. If enough measurement values are collected (say, 10 values for every cell), the weight vectors /w,, are determined. Any component plane J of the SOM, that is, the array of scalar values ///, representing they* components of the weight vectors W/ and having the same format as the SOM array, can be displayed separately, and the values of the //y can be represented on it using colour scale or shades of grey. The weight vectors of the SOM form a code-book. The SOM algorithm performs a topology preserving mapping from the multi-dimensional input space onto map units so that relative distances between data points are preserved. Data points lying near each other in the mput space will be mapped onto nearby map units. The SOM can thus serve as a clustering tool of high-dimensional data. It also has capability to generalize; that is, the network can interpolate between previously encountered inputs. KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
292
^
The neurons of the map are connected to adjacent neurons by a neighborhood relation, which dictates the topology of the map. Usually rectangular or hexagonal topology is used. Immediate neighbors (adjacent neurons) belong to the neighborhood N, of the neuron i. In the basic SOM algorithm, the topological relations and the number of neurons are fixed fi-om the beginning. The number of neurons determines the granularity of the mapping, which affects accuracy and the generalization capability of the SOM. During the iterative training procedure, the SOM forms an "elastic" net that folds onto the "cloud" formed by the input data. The net tends to approximate the probability densities of the data (Kohonen, 1995); code-book vectors tend to drift to where the data are dense, while there are only a few code-book vectors where data are sparse. At each training step, one sample vector X is randomly drawnfi-omthe input data set. Distances (i.e., similarities) between the x and all the code-book vectors are computed. The Best-Matching Unit (BMU) is the map unit whose weight vector is closest to x. After finding the BMU; the weight vectors of the SOM are updated. The BMU and its topological neighbors are moved closer to the input vector in the input space. The SOM can be used eflBciently in data visualization due to its ability to approximate the probability density of input data and to represent it in two dimensions. Several different ways to visualize the network are developed (Simula and Kangas, 1995), two of which are introduced in the following: •
•
9.4.3
The unified distance matrix (U-matrix) method by Ultsch, et al., (1990) visualizes the structure of the SOM. First, the matrix of distances (U-matrix) between the weight vector of each neuron and its neighbors is calculated. Then some suitable presentation, such as a grey-level image (livarinen, et al., 1994), is selected to visualize the matrix. Component plane representation visualizes relative component values of the weight vectors of the SOM. It can be considered as a "sliced" version of the SOM, where each plane shows the distribution of one weight vector component. Using the component plane representation, dependencies between different process parameters can be investigated. A proper choice of the colors used in visualization will make this task easier. Discovering hidden dependencies
The analysis is designed to discover how some of the measured values depend on each other, how they change together, how they can be simplified by slicing the n-dimensional statespace of the measured values on component planes, and how to seek for similar patterns at the same places of the planes. If a similar pattern has been found, it shows that the weight values are similarly high or low, showing the co-incidence and the potential co-dependence of the two components. This does not necessarily indicate that these parameters or factors have a causal connection. They can appear together, depending on a third factor or several other factors, indicating that their inter-dependence. The components of the input vector can be continuous or they can be discrete values.
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
293 9.5
NUMEMCAL DATA COVERING THE GAPS IN KNOWLEDGE
The area of computational intelligence offering true learning capability is that of Artificial Neural Networks. Artificial Neural Networks are capable of modeling extremely large and complex problems, involving hundreds of variables. The models they generate can identify patterns and relationships in data that were previously unknown. Neural networks are nonparametric and are capable of taking on any form that the data requires. This ability makes neural networks extremely accurate predictors of non-linear real events. The paradigms in this field are based on direct modeling of the neural system in living organisms. The I/O space map is modeled as a series of interacting nodes in a network. When a signal appears at a node, it is amplified by a "weight" assigned to each connection between this node and others. At the receiving node, all incoming signals are summed up to give an overall force acting on the neuron. 9.5.1 Artificial neural networks The advantage of neural networks is their ability to learn or adapt to changing conditions. Learning begins by selecting a set of random weights and presenting the network with a set of known I/0-valuesfi-oma large set of training data. The network predicts the output. These are compared with the desired output. The error is calculated in order to modify the weights. The new set of I/O data is examined, weights are modified using the regression or gradient-method and so on. This process continues until the overall error is within a pre-defined tolerance. This is a kind of supervised learning using the back-propagation technique. The number of publications dealing with neural networks in rolling applications has increased during the past few years and the trend in Figure 9.4 suggests that the number may be doubled by 1997 or 1998. However, the number is very small when compared to papers dealing with neural networks in other industrial applications.
90
91
92
93 Year
94
95
Figure 9.4 Number of papers dealing with NEURAL NETWORKS in rolling applications
KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
294 9.5.2
Training the artificial neural networks
Multi-layer perceptrons are feed forward type neural networks. The calculation units, called perceptrons, shown in Figure 9.5, perform the following ftinction: (9.5)
>' = / ( S H ' , X , )
where/is usually a sigmoid function of the form: /(i/) = ( l 4 - . - ) '
(9.6)
Figure 9.5 Illustration of a perceptron unit In neural networks the perceptron units are arranged in layers (Figure 9.6), where the outputs;^i are calculated from the input vector X=(xi, ...,XM), using the weights w stored in the network. Most common neural networks architecture consists of two layers of perceptrons.
Bias
Input layer
Bias
Hidden layer
Output layer
Figure 9.6 One hidden layer neural network architecture with fully connected nodes MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
295 Finding an optimal set of weights that perform the desired mapping from inputs to outputs requires training. The back propagation learning rule has been widely accepted as the standard training method for neural networks. It incorporates the least mean squares method to minimize the following equation: Ep = y2i:Sp
(9.7)
where p refers to a pair of input and output vectors, and ^ is the difference between actual and desired outputs. By determining the gradient of Ep with respect to the weights w, the weights can be adjusted in order to minimize the total error of produced outputs. The update rule for the weights can be written as:
Wy{t + l)=Wyit)-^
(9.8)
where / refers to the weights from input layer to the hidden layer, y refers to the weights from hidden layer to the output layer and rj is the learning rate parameter, which is usually a positive number between 0 and 1. The neural network learns by examples, that is, data, presented to it during training. By definition, a neural network with one hidden layer can learn any function with infinite accuracy. However, in applications involving variables of finite accuracy, it is not advisable to train the neural network to the lowest possible prediction error. Instead of memorizing the available data, the training should aim at a good generalization (Rumelhart, et al., 1994). A measure of generalization is the performance of the neural network on previously unseen data. A common way of testing the generaUzation capabilities is to divide the available data into two sets; one for training and one for testing. At the beginning of the training, the average prediction error usually decreases for both data sets. At some point the error on the test data starts to increase while the training error continues to decrease. The sets of weights that produce the lowest test error are generally considered to give the best generalization. The input and output layer sizes depend on the application (the numbers of independent and dependent variables). The hiddenlayer size is set up between the input layer size and output layer size. The input layer size is generally much larger than the output layer size (which is possibly quite small). The backpropagation network has the ability to learn any arbitrary complex non-linear mapping due to the introduction of the hidden layer. The greatest benefit of the neural networks is their interpolation ability. When one of the data sources provides less than expected, fiirther data generation is required, and properly trained neural networks are capable of supplying the needed information. In order to estimate the flow stress at elevated temperatures a large number of measurements are necessary. The use of neural networks can help in covering the knowledge gaps. The results of the interpolation should be handled with special care. An example concerns the chemical content of steels. Some predictions may be made by the neural network, concerning the material attributes, but if the training was not performed carefiilly, potential metallurgical changes may be ignored. Precipitation or new chemical connections may appear, and singularities in the mechanical properties may make the predictions completely unreliable. KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
296 9.5.3
Hybrid models in hot rolling
The neural network models are used frequently for estimating correction factors in the physically based rolling models that take into account the features responsible for the variations in the process (Bresson, 1993; Larkiola, et al., 1995; Cho, 1996; Kappen, and Gielen, 1995; Too, et al., 1996; Postlethwaite, et al., 1996). These hybrid models either solve the difficulties of mapping between inputs and outputs, by leaving only unknown dependencies for the neural network to solve, or they are used as fast models from numerically simulated data in order to avoid the long computations in the real-time environment (Sartori, and Antsaklis, 1991; Wiklund, 1996). By using simulated data it is possible to overcome the common problem of uneven distribution, associated with logged process data. In the automation and control of the strip flatness and the determination of mill settings needed for an incoming strip before the strip actually enters the mill, neural networks, based on both measured and simulated data are used. An efficient process model should be able to predict rolling forces, torque, material properties etc. with sufficient accuracy and reliability. It should be possible to update the network reasonably fast. Additional real time corrections, based on continuous measurements, compensate for the pre-calculation error by adapting the model to the process. Neural networks are able to do both modeling and adaptation equally efficiently (Portman, 1995). For the control task a reasonable task sharing between the mathematical modeling and neural network based correction is necessary. On-line computations should be performed by the neural networks, but the possibilities of mechanically correct mathematical modeUng should also be utilized. A typical task sharing is as follows: • • •
prediction of the width changes in the roughing mill; corrections, based on the measurements on exit from the finishing train; and correction of the strip or plate temperature, calculated by analytical models.
Networks used in roUing mill control can be divided into two groups: networks trained offline in development laboratories and built into the control system, and networks that are "trained on the job".
9.6
CASE STUDIES
In what follows, seven studies are reviewed. These include a framework for the prediction of the quality of the product using the methods of artificial intelligence and the use of selforganizing maps in a hot strip rolling mill. The use of neural networks is next and these are illustrated by a method to predict the austenite grain size in hot rolling of steels, to predict the constitutive behavior of steels, to predict the roll force in hot strip rolling and to predict the parameters in hot rolling of aluminum. In each of these the emphasis is on considering the quality of the predictions and how they relate experimental or industrial data. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
297 9.6.1
Prediction of the product quality based on analogies
An example for the expert system usingfijzzylogic and fuzzy inference to find analogies for the prediction of the grain size in hot rolling is described in (Cser, Lenard and Farkas, 1994). The governing idea of the expert system for predicting the grain size and other quality parameters of hot rolled products has been that a similar set up of a similar forming system produces similar quality. Experience of the rolling industry shows that the grain size is influenced not only by the forming system inside the rolling mill, but by the environment between the rolling operations. It is the main idea in the description of the multi-operation rolling processes. The multi-pass rolling process is a sequence of rolling and "between stands" stages and events. The data collected, for example the object Material final properties after the first pass becomes the input data for the second pass, and so on. Such an approach enables the build up of a knowledge base, which is conforms to the physical system. material properties lubrication, speed gap control
inference + contro)
J
quality
I operation-specific rules
T
/"——^
STANDI
STAMD2
Interstandl
interstand2 InterstandS
STAND3 L
J
V
)
description of the stand-related forming system domains
Figure 9.7 Structure of the Expert System predicting the grain size in hot rolling However, the attributes stored in this frame are the results of the influences of pass data, described as objects Stand, Material, Workpiece, Temperature (in the deformation zone). Technology, and "between stands" data, such as Layout, Physical/metallui^ical data, and Cooling. All these are slots in aframecalled the Forming system, and they are frames with slots at the same time. The slots are also frames and so on. This hierarchical structure contains all the material and technological parameters as well as the parameters of the equipment. Structure of the program is given, schematically, in Figure 9.7. A distributed knowledge base has been used in a segmented structure: • • •
forming system is described separately for each stand and for each inter-stand state; pass-specific knowledge domains are defined; and general rules, known in the AI literature as Deep knowledge, are established. KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
298 In accordance with this structure, data describing the elements of the forming systems in each pass and inter-pass state are stored in the object oriented database, serving as the knowledge base of the forming system. For data acquisition, the facilities of this data base management system are used. Teaching the system proceeds by manual feeding using case studies, collected in the given rolling mill. The subsequent analysis of the answers given by the expert system is enabled by the identification numbers (ED) or the dates of the knowledge acquisition. The fuzzification proceeds only before the inference, during the search for the analogies, as shown in Figure 9.8. Having found them, the de-fuzzification gives numerical results with confidence factors. The inference is built up on the results collected from the literature and industrial practice, as well as from the results of modeling.
Knowledge |-»{Fuzzification) F u z 2 y | < Defuzzification>-»- Results & [acquisition jnferencej evaluation
KNOWLDEGE BASE
Figure 9.8 Fuzzification and de-fuzzification in the Expert System The final goal of the expert system is to predict the expected material properties of the plate or strip, rolled with a given chemical content as well as with a given set of technological parameters. The cornerstone of the truth in such predictions is the number of case studies stored in the data/knowledge base. If this number is small, the system gives predictions with very low confidence factors and they do not have any practical value. 9.6.2
SOMin a hot strip mill
In order to meet the challenge of improving the product quality, steel manufacturers use highly advanced rolling systems with high grade of automation and on-line data sampling. However, the large amount of collected data can be used not only for registrations required by ISO 9000, but is a rich source of knowledge about the extremely complex processes. Figure 9.9 shows a scheme of a hot rolling mill with continuous casting machines, furnaces, a roughing mill and a multi-stand finishing train. The methods of data mining can be used for improving the geometric accuracy of the strips. When searching for the reasons of the scatter in the geometric characteristics (quality parameters) of the strip, self organizing maps represent an efficient tool when they are applied to the control of information and to the quality parameters, such as the thickness, profile (crown, defined as the difference between the center gauge and the specified edge thickness), width deviation, flatness, measured in I units (I=AL/L X 10 , where AL/L is the strip waviness, AL is the difference between the longest and shortest ribbon across the width of the strip, and L is the wavelength), and the wedge. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
299 statistically preprocessed data
2
8
48 -40Mbyte/strip
Sampled data (1/sec)
1
Scanned data .
1
casting machines
^m^
111
chemical composition (alloying e
4
4
4
6
furnaces
EEEEl
l\
F. F,. F,. S
F,
roughing mill
F„
If t
T T,
F,
Tn. H. W. We. R. Pr Tc T^
Tail Body Head
Tail Body Head {1/sec) max. deviation min. deviation / \ avg. deviation min max sL deviation 1/sec
Figure 9.9 On-line measurements (data sources) in hot rolling (Ci - casting machines, Fi - furnaces, Tbar, Wbar - bar temperature and bar width, T temperatures of the strip, upside, downside, head, body and tail, Fi (F, Fb, Ft) - force vector in stand I (roll separating force, roll bending force, strip tension force), !„ - temperature, measured before the stand, H, W, We, FI, Pr - geometric quality parameters: thickness, width, wedge, flatness, profile, Tc - coiling temperature) The first task is to analyze the influence of the continuous casting machines on the average value and the standard deviation as an example for using one discrete parameter in the analysis. The question is whether the control of the continuous casting machines influences the flatness value. As is well known, poor flatness or shape, of both hot and cold rolled strips is caused by differential elongation across their width, (Ginzburg, 1989). These differences produce corresponding internal stresses within the strip. Since the HSLA steels are much more sensitive to the overall history of processing, the collected data of more than 16000 strips were separated into two groups: low-carbon steels and HSLA steels. The analysis can be done separately for the head, body, and tail of the strip in order to estimate the necessary corrections in the set-up values. The relative values (e.g. AWAV for the width, or AH/H for the thickness) are used in order to enable a comparison of the dimensionless variables. Comparing the patterns on the parameter maps, no similarity can be established with any of the patterns on the plans, corresponding to the casting machines. The conclusion is clear: the control of casters works equally well in all three units. Similarly, no connection is seen between the geometric quality of the strip and the type of the re-heat fiimace, even in the case of the HSLA steels, though it is well known that they are very sensitive to the temperature and the duration of re-heating.
KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
300 9.6.3 Neural networks for grain size prediction Applications of neural networks in rolling cover a wide field of applications ranging from flatness control to the prediction of mechanical properties of the rolled material. In addition, in rolling the most effective way of applying neural networks may not be the global neural network model but a combination of the neural network and the classical mathematical model (Larkiola, et al., 1996). Industrial applications of the neural networks can be divided into the groups: • • •
predictive type applications, for example, product quality parameters; estimation type applications, for example, roll separating force, torque etc.; and control and optimization.
A typical case of the prediction/estimation type applications is the prediction of microstructure and final mechanical properties of hot rolled steels. The problem is well known by the difficulties it presents during modeling. A knowledge based approach for this task is represented by the first case study, in Section 9.6.1. The extremely large number of parameters as inputs and many characteristic parameters as outputs make this problem highly complex. Furthermore, some of these parameters do not directly affect the microstructure but indirectly through others that have their own effect, as well. The neural network used for modeling the grain size (Farkas and Arvai, 1995) of carbon steels after processing has 11 inputs and 7 outputs. The inputs are: roll radius, entry thickness, exit thickness, rolling speed, entry temperature, exit temperature, times and cooling rates, the heat transfer coefficient, coefficient of friction, initial grain size and carbon content. The outputs are: final grain size at 5 different locations of the cross section of the sample, roll force and roll torque. One hidden layer is used, depending on the configuration of the network program. The learning process uses a back propagation scheme. 9.6.4
A study of neural networks for the prediction of constitutive behavior of HSLA and carbon steels
Back propagation neural networks are utilized to store and predict the flow stresses of several steels. A convergence algorithm using a varying learning factor is developed, which has been shown to save one sixth of the learning time when compared with an algorithm in which a constant leammg factor is utilized. A performance test shows that the well-trained neural network can interpolate flow stresses very well if the information for interpolation is sufficient in the training pairs. The ability of the network to extrapolate is found not to be impressive. The neural network can handle several groups of data during adaptive learning simultaneously without losing accuracy. The time needed for adaptive learning to reach a reasonable level of accuracy is short. Comparing the predicted resuhs to other models, the output of the neural network is shown to have the highest accuracy. In both cold and hot flat rolling processes the thickness control of a plate or a strip is governed by the mill stretch formula;
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
hexit=So+j
(9.9)
where hexn is the exit thickness, So is the roll gap distance, K is the mill stiffness, known for the particular mill and F is roll force. The latter is a function of a number of process parameters, such as the temperature, entry thickness, reduction, strain rate, coefficient of friction, front and back tensions, the viscosity of the lubricant and the flow stress of the rolled material. During hot rolling, the roll force is also affected by the evolution of the microstructure In the above equation K and So are known values while F and hexn are unknown. Once the roll force is predicted accurately, the stretch of the mill is calculated and the correct roll gap can be set to make the exit thickness satisfy the target requirement. Therefore, the roll force model and the prediction of flow stress play important roles in gauge control. The prediction of the flow stress is the subject of the present study. Experimental results: Six steels, one IF steel (Steel A), one extra-low carbon steel (Steel B), three low carbon steels (Steel C, D and E) and one Nb steel (F), are used in this work. Their chemical compositions are listed in Table 9.1. The flow curves of Steel C were obtained from isothermal ring compression tests (Hwu et al., 1993). The flow curves of the remaining steels were obtained by conducting isothermal compression tests with cylindrical samples. The experimental parameters are shown in Table 9.2, in which X indicates that the flow stress data for that particular condition are used for training the neural network. The symbol O indicates the data used for testing the performance of the trained neural network. The terms in the brackets (A, Bl, B2, etc.) v^U be referred to later. Table 9.1 Chemical composition (wt%) steel A B C D E F
C 0.0026 0.003 0.045 0.19 0.343 0.043
Mn 0.16 0.27 0.28 0.72 0.70 1.43
Si 0.006 0.35 0.01 0.05 0.09 0.312
P 0.002 0.056
S 0.011 0.005
0.009 0.008 0.001
0.007 0.009 0.006
Ni
Cr
Mo
Cu
— —
— —
— —
.-_ —
—
—
— 0.006 0.014
0.023 0.003 0.139 0.252
— 0.021 0.037
Ti 0.013
Nb 0.029
«_
-__
— — ...
— — 0.075
Fe balance balance balance balance balance balance
Effect of input variables and number of nodes in the hidden layer: In a previous study (Hwu et al, 1994) three process variables - temperature, strain rate and strain - were selected as input for training the neural networks, but the chemical composition of the steel was not considered since only one steel was used. In the present investigation, however, six different steels are involved and this makes it necessary to include their chemical compositions among the input variables. For carbon steels, carbon, manganese and silicon are dominant elements which affect the flow stress significantly. For microalloyed steels, niobium forms precipitates which retard the restoration mechanisms and increase the flow stress. Hence, the contents of carbon, manganese, silicon and niobium of each steel in Table 9.1 are selected as the extra four input variables. Adding to the three process variables, there are now seven inputs and one output, stress, in the training pairs. Traditionally the carbon equivalent Ceq, is used to indicate the level of strength of steels and is expressed, following Laasraoui and Jonas, (1991c):
KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
302
^
•-C +
Mn Ni+Cu + 6 15
+
Cr + Mo+V 5
(9.10)
Table 9.2 Experimental conditions steel
A
B
C
D
E
F
conditions temperature 1100°C 1000°C 950°C
1.0 s' X
temperature llOO'^C 1050°C 1000°C 950°C
1.0 s' X X X X
temperature 1050°C 1000°C 900°C
1.0 s-' X 0(C) X
temperature 1100°C 1000°C 900°C
1.0 S-' X X X
temperature 1100°C 1000°C 900°C
1.0 S-' X X X
temperature 1000°C 970°C 910°C 860°C
0.1 s'* X 0(F1) X X
strain rate 0.1 s'^ X 0(A) X strain rate 0.5 s'^ X 0(B1) X X strain rate 0.1s-' X X X strain rate 0.1 S-' X 0(D) X strain rate 0.1 S-' X X 0(E) strain rate 0.01 S-' X X X 0(F2)
O.Ols-' X
0.05 S-' X X X 0(B2) O.Ols-' X X X 0.01 S-' X X 0.01 S-' X X 0.001 s' X X X X
In order to reduce the number of variables, the contents of carbon and manganese are replaced by the carbon equivalent and the number of input variables is reduced to six. The flow stresses, adopted for training, are selected from the flow curves of each steel at various experimental conditions, indicated by X in Table 9.2. They are taken at several values of strain, starting at 0.05, then 0.1, followed by increments of 0.1 to the steady state strain. The total number of training pairs for the six steels is thus 523, referred to as Pattern I. In the first attempt, three neural networks with seven inputs are trained to examine the effect of the number of nodes in the hidden layer. The results show that 25 is an optimum number of nodes, MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
303^
as given in Table 9.3. Keeping this number of nodes in the hidden layer, a neural network with six inputs (6x25x1) is then trained to examine the effect of the input variables. After 5000 iterations, the sum of square of the errors, the E value, of the network reaches 0.12896, higher than the results obtained with seven inputs, indicating that the training results become worse when the carbon equivalent is adopted in the training pairs. In Table 9.3 ;/ is a constant learning factor while T/O is the initial value of the learning factor that is automatically adjusted during the training. Table 9.3 Training results type of learning factor network Tl 7x15x1 77 = 0.3, constant 7 X 25 X 1 7 = 0.3, constant 7x35x1 77 = 0.3, constant 6 X 25 X 1 77 = 0.3, constant 7 X 25 X 1 770=0.3, Algorithm II 7 X 25 X 1 770=0.3, Algorithm I 7 X 25 X 1 770=0.3, Algorithm I 7 X 25 X 1 77 = 0.3, constant
iteration 5000 5000 5000 5000 20000 20000 60000 60000
sum of squares of error (£) 0.12085 0.11861 0.12319 0.12896 0.07837 0.05622 0.02547 0.02731
The effect of a convergence algorithm: Previous experience (Hwu et al, 1994) shows that if the learning factor 77 is kept constant, the convergence rate becomes very slow when E is small, and that convergence can be improved by reducing the value of learning factor. Because 77 is used to control the updatmg step of the weighting factors, w,y, during searching for the minimum o^E, it is helpful for the network to find a steeper path to reach the minimum when the updating step is reduced. Hence, two convergence algorithms are designed to make the neural network adjust the learning factor automatically during training. The first one (Algorithm I) is based on the comparison of the convergence rate to a limiting criterion. When the limit, such as 5x10'^, is reached the learning factor is reduced by 20%. In the second algorithm (Algorithm II) the learning factor is reduced by 20% after each 2000 iterations. The iterations are stopped when either 77 reaches a specific value (for example, 0.005) or when E reaches the convergence criterion. Using the second algorithm with an initial value of 77 as 0.3, the learning factor reaches 0.005 after 20000 iterations and the sum of the squares of the error is 0.07837. With the first algorithm and the same initial value of 77, E becomes 0.05622 after 20000 iterations. The final E value fiirther reduces to 0.02547 after 60000 iterations, as shown in Table 9.3. Compared with the algorithm with a constant learning factor during training. Algorithm I can save at least one sixth of the learning time without losing accuracy. Performance Test: The drawback of the back propagation learning algorithm is that the global minimum o^E cannot be formally shown to have been reached during learning (White, 1989) . To overcome this problem, the performance test after training is essential. Two groups of data are then prepared to test the performance of the trained neural network. The flow KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
304 stresses in the first group are picked from six of the training flow curves, the conditions being shown in Table 9.4, at internal strains between the sampling strains which were used for training. The total number of the data is 223. The average errors of the testing data and the standard deviations of each curve are listed in Table 9.4. Except for one point with a high relative error over 10% which belongs to the strain of 0.06 and steel C, the relative errors of the rest of the data are within acceptable range.
Table 9.4 Testing data and results steel temperature strain rate (°c) A 950 0.1 B 1000 0.5 1050 C 1.0 D 900 0.01 E 1100 1.0 F 900 0.001
average of error (%) -0.0166 0.2116 0.4831 0.1627 4.5766 2.5746
standard deviation of error (%) 0.5060 2.4735 2.6450 3.3529 3.5771 1.5435
Table 9.5 Testing results of the second group of data condition average of error (%) STD* of error (%) A -14.657 2.9651 Bl 6.610 1.5086 B2 -20.487 7.2799 C 1.412 6.5351 D 10.352 2.7652 E 8.611 4.7036 Fl -0.534 1.4757 F2 -6.935 1.8835 STD : Standard Deviation
The second group of testing data included the flow stresses of the conditions marked with the symbol O in Table 9.2. These experimental conditions, which were not included in the training pairs, were adopted to test the performance of interpolation and extrapolation of the well-trained neural network. The average values of errors and standard deviations of each condition are shown in Table 9.5. Observe that the neural network can interpolate for the flow stresses successfully if the mformation in the training pairs is sufficient, such as Bl, C, Fl and F2, as shown in Table 9.2. For steel B, 10 conditions were used for training and condition Bl is in the center of the matrix. For steel C, eight conditions were used for training. Although MATHEMAHCAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
305 condition C is on the edge of the matrix, the neural network is able to interpolate for the stresses reasonably well with the exception of one point. The situations of conditions Fl and F2 are similar to the condition C. For steel D, seven conditions were used in the training and condition D is in the center of the matrix. The predicted results are not as good as for condition Bl, however, because of the deficit of mformation at the neighboring comer. For steel E, again seven conditions were used for training. Note that condition E is on the bottom edge, at the lowest temperature of 900°C. The situation of condition E is similar to that of F2, but the predicted results are worse because of the same reason as condition D: insufficient amount of information exists in the neighborhood. For steel A, only four conditions are involved in the training and the predicted resuhs are quite poor with relative errors between -10% and -20%. The condition B2 is used to test the performance when extrapolation is required and the predicted results are not impressive. A well-trained neural network can interpolate flow stresses quite successfully regardless where the condition is located in the center or on the edge of the condition matrix, provided the information is sufficient. The ability of extrapolation of the neural network, however, is not as good as for interpolation. Adaptability: Adaptability is one of the major considerations for a model to be used for online control. In this section, the adaptability of the neural network will be examined in two ways. In the first try, only the data of condition B2 are used. The testing data of condition B2 are added into the training pairs and the adaptive training starts by using the same weighting matrix Wij, obtainedfi-omthe training and the convergence Algorithm I with an initial value of 77 of 0.3. The resuhs are shown in Table 9.6. After 1000 iterations in adaptive learning, the average value of errors is reduced fi-om -20.48% to -6.08% and the standard deviation is decreased by about 1%. The relative errors, with two exceptions, are within ±10%. The average of errors and standard deviation of the original training data change only slightly. Thus, it is concluded that adaptive learning does not affect the predictive ability of the network when new data are added into the training pairs. Further, when the adaptive learning proceeds, the errors of prediction are reduced even more. Table 9.6 Adaptive training results of condition B2 after training condiafter adapting tion iteration =1000 average STD STD average training data B2
%
%
%
%
0.05703 -20.486
3.0754 7.2799
0.2676 -6.0800
3.5449 6.2396
after iteration average
% 0.1983 -4.4796
adapting =3000 STD
after iteration average
adapting =5000 STD
%
%
%
3.3780 6.4721
0.1693 -3.736
3.3227 6.7284
In the second trial the five conditions. A, B2, D, E, and Fl, are added and the network is adapted simuhaneously. The initial conditions of adaptive training are the same as in the first try. The adaptive training resuhs are shown in Table 9.7. A notable improvement in accuracy is obtainedfi-omthe first 1000 iterations for conditions A and B2. For condition Fl, the accuracy improvement is limited, indicating that for the cases that are already highly accurate, the accuracy will not be lost when new data are added. Although the number of adapted new data KNOWLEDGE BASED MODEUNG
306 has been increased from one to five conditions in the second try, the average of errors and standard deviation of the original training data change little. The adaptive training results of conditions B2 in these two tries are practically identical, see Tables 9.6 and 9.7. The neural network can handle several groups of data during adaptive training simultaneously without losing accuracy. Table 9.7 Testing and adaptive training results after condiafter training iteration tion average STD* average % % % training 0.05703 3.0754 0.09321 -14.657 2.9651 -3.236 A 6.610 1.5086 Bl -20.487 7.2799 -5.990 B2 1.412 6.5351 C 10.352 2.7652 D 7.012 8.611 4.7036 2.308 E -0.534 1.4757 -0.600 Fl -6.935 1.8835 F2
adapting =1000 STD % 3.9078 2.5456
after iteration average % 0.05435 -1.199
adapting =3000 STD % 3.5302 2.1252
after iteration average % 0.05030 -0.202
adapting =20000 STD % 3.3219 2.3017
5.9861
-4.102
5.0261
-3.044
3.9384
3.2641 3.3371 1.8248
4.157 1.190 -0.648
2.7395 2.6948 1.7485
3.478 1.064 -0.479
2.1865 2.4776 1.6204
The conditions Bl, C and F2 are used for testing the performance of the adapted neural network after 3000 iterations. Comparison with the testing results after training, show no improvement in accuracy for condition C is found because there is no extra condition added into training pairs during adaptive learning. The relative errors of condition F2 decrease by about 2% after adaptive training, because the condition Fl has been included in the training pairs to make the information more complete. When the comer condition B2 is added into the training pairs, the errors of predictions for condition Bl are reduced by about 4%, showing that the comer conditions in the matrix are necessary in contributing to the accuracy of the network. It is concluded that the information included in the training pairs is very important and will affect the predictive capability of the neural network. Effect of input data: In order to emphasize the importance of input data, new training pairs are selected. Flow stresses are randomly selected from the flow curves of the six steels and used as new training pairs - a total of 489 groups - and the remaining data -158 groups are used for testing. The new training pairs are referred to as Pattern 11 while the previous training pairs are called Pattem I. The training procedure and conditions are the same with both pattems. The training results after 60000 iterations show that the average of errors and standard deviation are slightly higher with Pattem 11 than with Pattem I. Compared with the testing results of Pattem I, the accuracy of predictions has been significantly improved. It is observed that although the number of the training data is less, the selection of input data for training the neural network not only influences the accuracy of prediction, but also avoids the possibility of extrapolation. Comparison of the accuracy of the neural network with that of statistical methods: In order to compare the predictive abilities of some of the models reviewed above with those of MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPER TIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
307 the neural network approach, the flow stresses of steel B are also modeled by Wang's model (Wang and Lenard, 1991), the Voce Equation (Beynon and Sellars, 1992) and Jonas' model (Laasraoui and Jonas, 1991c). The outputs from the neural network have the highest accuracy. 9.6.5 Application of neural networks in the prediction of roll force in hot rolling Three neural networks are utilized to predict the roll force during hot rolling. The first network is used to model the average flow stress of an extra-low carbon steel in the austenite, ferrite and the two-phase regions, obtained from experimental results. A finite-element program is used to calculate the average temperature in the roll bite and a database of the temperatures is thus generated. The second neural network is employed to handle this database. The third network is used for adaptive learning while predicting the roll separating forces. Combining these networks with Alexander's roll force model, the roll separating forces are predicted with good accuracy. In what follows, the hot compression and the hot rolling experiments are described first. The construction of the three neural networks is then given, followed by a discussion of the capabilities of the combined model. Equipment: The rolling tests were conducted on a two-high, Stanat experimental rolling mill. The roll diameters were 150 mm. The rolls were hardened to Re = 60. The surface roughness was 0.8 jxm. The temperatures were monitored by type K, shielded thermocouples, embedded in the slabs. The compression tests were conducted on a computer-controlled servohydraulic testing system. Material: The chemical composition of the steel is given in Table 9.8. Table 9.8 Chemical composition of the steel, by weight% C Si Mn P S 0.003 0.3 0.27 0.056 0.005
Fe balance
Procedure: Slabs with different initial thickness were rolled at different temperatures in the austenite and ferrite regions in a single pass. Slabs were also rolled in a single pass in the twophase region with different amounts of ferrite, obtained by controlling the delay times afl:er the start of the phase transformation and determined, assuming that an Avrami-type relation can be used to model the austenite-to-ferrite transformation. Two slabs were rolled in three passes, in the austenite, two-phase and ferrite regions, respectively. Compression tests: 8 mm diameter, 12 mm high cylindrical samples were compressed at various rates of strain to a total strain of unity. True stress-true strain curves were obtained. The tests were conducted on a computer-controlled servohydraulic testing system, in a radiant fiimace. Friction was reduced by applying a glass powder-alcohol emulsion to the recessed ends of the compression samples. Hot rolling tests: 270 mm slabs were hot rolled into 25 mm thick plates on an industrial rolling mill and then annealed at 1200°C for 4 hours. Specimens, 40 mm in width, 70 mm in length and different thickness were machined from the annealed plate. Two K-type (chromelalumel) shielded thermocouples, with an outside diameter of 1.54 mm and 0.26 mm KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
308
^
thermocouple wires, were embedded in the centre and 2 mm beneath the surface, respectively, of specimens with thickness 12 mm and 15 mm. One thermocouple was embedded centrally in the specimens with thickness under 12 mm. Specimens were reheated to 1100°C, held for 10 minutes, cooled in air and rolled at specific temperatures in a single pass. The flow stress network: The average flow stress of the extra-low carbon steel, in the austenite, two-phase and ferrite regions, at different temperatures, strains and strain rates were calculated from the true stress-strain curves (Hwu et al., 1994). A two-hidden-layer neural network, with 12 nodes in each layer, has been developed to model the average flow stress. In addition to the three process variables of the temperature, strain and strain rate, a phase index has also been introduced as the fourth input variable in order to distinguish among the flow curves in the various regimes. The only output variable is the average flow stress. 348 groups of data, randomly selected from a total of 482 groups of data, are utilized to train the network. After 60000 iterations, the sum of the sQuare of the errors between the outputs from neural network and targets reached 0.0105 and the training process is ended. The relative errors of most training pairs are within ± 5%. The rest of the experimental data is used for testing the performance of this network. The results show that the average error reaches -0.066%, the standard deviation is 2.551%, and even the maximum error is less than ±10%. This welltrained flow stress network is then used to predict the average flow stress in subsequent calculations of the roll separating forces. The temperature of the strip in the roll bite is one of the important process parameters and determines the magnitude of the flow stress of the rolled strip during the pass. As mentioned above, in order to accurately predict the flow stress by the flow stress network, the exact temperature in the roll bite, rather than the initial temperature of strip, is necessary. The average temperature in the roll bite is determined by several process variables, such as the heat transfer coefficient in the contact area, the initial temperature of the strip, the flow stress, roll speed, initial thickness and reduction. The finite-element program, Elroll, developed by Pietrzyk and Lenard, (1991), is used to calculate the average temperature in the roll bite. The parameters used in the computations, covering the experimental rolling conditions, are listed in Table II. During the calculations, the roll temperature and roll diameter are kept constant, at 25°C and 150 mm, respectively. A database, having a total of 1944 conditions, is thus built. Table 9.9 Conditions for the calculation of the average temperature variables values heat transfer coefficient ( W W K ) 4000, 6000, 8000 750, 800, 850 initial temperature (°C) 900, 950, 1050 average flow stress (MPa) 30, 80, 130, 180 roll speed (rpm) 5, 15, 50 initial thickness (mm) 6, 10, 15 reduction (%) 10, 30, 50 A single hidden layer neural network with 25 nodes in the hidden layer is used to handle this database. The six variables, listed in Table 9.9, are selected for inputs and the only output is the MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
309 average temperature. Three quarters of the data are arbitrarily selected to train this network and the rest are used for testing. The training procedure is finished after 60000 iterations and satisfactory results have been obtained. 9,6.5.1
Rolling Tests
The slabs were rolled in both the austenite and the ferrite regions in a single pass. The rolling conditions are listed in Table 9.10. The temperature changes in the roll bite are simulated by the finite-element model, described in Chapter 5. When the heat transfer coefficient is 7000 W/m^K, the simulation results show that the measured temperature is close to the calculated values. Table 9.10 Rolling Conditions No h red. (mm) (%) 1 15.0 44 2
12.0
14
3
12.0
31
4
12.0
46
5
9.72
16
6
8.10
30
7
6.2
16
8 9
9.20 12.0
15 24
temperature (°C) 950, 928, 907, 865, 850, 798 1043,950,928,911,875, 852, 798 1026, 962, 925, 910, 907, 869, 859, 802 1021, 946, 930, 915, 878, 860, 851, 795 1018, 947, 926, 868, 848, 800 1031,954,930,870,835, 782 1035, 940, 921, 860, 845, 785 947, 928, 809, 871 960, 956, 952, 950
Roll Force Predictions: Alexander's force model (Ford and Alexander, 1964) is one of the simplest and has been widely used for calculating the roll separating forces in hot strip mills. According to the model the roll force is expressed as: (9.11)
F = k„Qpld^
where F is roll separating force, k^ is the mean constrained flow stress in the roll bite for plane strain conditions. Id is the contact length, w is the width and Qp is a geometric factor which can be expressed as: Qp
(9.12)
=0.25(;r+Q) KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
310 in which Q, the average aspect ratio, is the ratio of the contact length and the average of the entry and exit thickness of the rolled piece. The product k„,Qp is the deformation resistance, which is equivalent to the total energy per unit volume, needed to roll the piece. Because k^ is the plastic energy per unit volume of the rolled material, the term Qp is considered to be the multiplier, expressing the redundant work. Hence Qp is always greater than or equal to unity and it is strongly affected by the geometry of the roll bite and the interface conditions between the rolls and rolled piece. When the mill conditions, such as the lubricant, roughness of work roll and scale change, Qp will also change. This term, in fact, reflects the dynamic conditions of the rolling mill. The relative errors of the predicted roll forces by Alexander's model for some of the conditions in Table 9.10 are not satisfactory. In order to improve the accuracy of the predictions, changing or adapting the geometric multiplier, Qp, to the current conditions is necessary. The new values of Qp are calculated in an inverse fashion by equating the roll separating forces, computed by Eq. (9.11), and the measured forces for all of the above conditions and thus, a database is built. The average values of the adapted Qp, for conditions from one to seven, deviate significantly from the values predicted by Alexander's model. The linear relationship between Qp and the aspect ratio of contact area still exits for constant reduction or constant initial thickness. Ideally, if the interface condition is kept constant, the adapted Qp should vary within a very narrow range for a specific geometric condition, even though the temperature changes. But the adapted Qp varies randomly with temperature for conditions seven and four, and varies within a narrow range for conditions one and two. A neural network, similar to the flow stress network, is selected to model the adapted Qp. Not only does the adapted Qp have a strong relationship with the aspect ratio, entry thickness and reduction, it also depends on the initial temperature. Hence, these four variables are chosen as the inputs and the only output is adapted Qp. A total of 52 groups of data, from conditions one to seven, are utilized to train this network. After 80000 iterations, the training procedure is stopped. The results show that the errors of most of the data are within ±2% and the maximum error is within ±6%. This welltrained network, called the adaptive network, is then used for adaptive learning of Q^,. Two groups of data are used to validate the performance of this adaptive network. The first group of data is condition eight, having four experimental points, with the entry thickness equal to 9.2 mm, and the reduction equal to 15%. The flow chart for predicting roll force is shown in Fig. 9.10. First, the initial flow stress of rolled material before rolling is predicted by the flow stress network. This is followed by calculating the average temperature in the roll bite using the temperature network. The exact average flow stress in the roll bite is then re-calculated by the flow stress network and the value of Q^ is predicted by the adaptive network. Finally, the roll force is calculated by Eq. (9.11). The relative errors of these four testing data are shown in Table 9.11. Compared to the resuhs predicted directly by Alexander's model, the accuracy of the predicted roll force by this adaptive network is significantly improved. Four experiments, having the same entry thickness, reduction and temperature, are included in the second group of testing data, as shown in Table 9.12. The predicted resuh of the first data by the adaptive network is worse than the predicted result by the Alexander model, as shown in the table. Thus the new adapted Qp of this testing data is calculated from the MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
m^ measured force and is then put into the training pairs to train the adaptive network to acquire this new information. When the adaptive learning is finished, the adaptive network is used for predicting roll force of the second testing data. Satisfactory results cannot be obtained for the second set of data until 40000 iterations during adaptive learning are finished, as shown in Table 9.12. The same procedure is repeated for predicting the roll force in the third and fourth set of experiments. It is observed that during the adaptive learning, not only is the required number of iterations in adaptive learning reduced, but the accuracy is also improved. The prediction for the first slab is not impressive because the information in the training pairs is not sufficient. But the neural network can improve the accuracy very quickly after an appropriate adaptive learning process. From this example, the adaptive network reveals its powerful ability in adaptation.
Inputs: strain, strain rate, tennperature, chemical composition
(Flowstress network
)
[Temperature network]
[Adaptive network
[Alexander's model ] ( Roll force}
Figure 9.10 The flow chart of the adaptive roll force model
Table 9.11 Relative errors of the first group of testing data No temp. relative error relative error (%) (%) (adaptive network) (Alexander's model) 11.63 1 947 0.99 2 956 17.60 4.33 9.58 3 871 5.86 4.60 4 809 4.97
KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
312 Table 9.12 Relative error of the second group of testing data relative No temp. iterations of relative error (%) error (%) adaptive (adaptive learning (Alexander's network) model) 0 1 952 10.84 15.12 2 950 1000 6.94 10.70 2 950 5000 6.94 10.10 2 950 4.00 40000 6.94 3 960 1000 2.00 8.86 500 4 956 0.51 7.23
9.6.6 Using neural networks to predict parameters in hot working of aluminum alloys The ability of an artificial neural network model, using a back propagation learning algorithm, to predict the flow stress, roll force and roll torque obtained during hot compression and rolling of aluminum alloys, is studied. The well-trained neural network models are shown to provide fast, accurate and consistent results, making them superior to other predictive techniques. Back propagation neural netivorks: The multi-layered feedforward back-propagation algorithm is central to much work on modeling and classification by neural networks. This technique is currently one of the most often used supervised learning algorithms. Supervised learning implies that a good set of data or pattern associations is needed to train the network. Input-output pairs are presented to the network, and weights are adjusted to minimize the error between network output and actual value. The knowledge that a neural network possesses is stored in these weights. The back propagation model, presented in Figures 9.5 and 9.6, has three layers of neurons: an input layer, a hidden layer and an output layer. The backpropagation training algorithm is an iterative gradient algorithm, designed to minimize the mean square error between the predicted output and the desired output. It requires continuously differentiable non-linearities. The algorithm of training a back-propagation network is summarized as follows. initialize weights and threshold value: Set all weights and threshold to small random values. Present input and desired output; compute the output of each node in the hidden layer; compute the output of each node in the output layer; compute the output layer error between the target and the observed output; compute the hidden layer error, adjust the weights and thresholds in the output layer; adjust the weights and thresholds in the hidden layer; and repeat the above steps on all pattern pairs until the output layer error is within the specified tolerance for each pattern and for each neuron. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
313 Deformation resistance of the material: Cylindrical samples of the Al 1100-H14 alloy of 20 mm diameter and 30 mm height have been used to determine the metal's resistance to deformation. The specimens have been machined from plates with the longitudinal direction parallel to the rolling direction. The flat ends of each specimen were machined to a depth of 0.1-0.2 mm to retain the lubricant, boron nitride. A type K thermocouple in an INCONEL shield, with outside diameter of 1.54 mm and 0.26 mm thermocouple wires, was embedded centrally in each specimen. The chemical composition of the material is given in Table 9.13. The compression tests were carried out on a servohydraulic testing system, at different true, constant strain rates and temperatures, as presented in Table 9.14. Temperatures were set to 400, 450, and 500°C and the strain rate ranged from 0.97 to 11.53 s'\
Table 9.13 The chemical composition of the material (weight %) Mn Si Zn Cu 0.05 1.00 0.1 0.05
Table 9.14 Experimental matrix used in flow stress evaluation tests temperature-O-- strain rate "=> 5.04 0.97 2.97 400 °C A3 Al A2 450 °C B3 Bl B2 500 T C3 CI C2
Al remainder
7.58 A4 B4 C4
11.53 A5 B5 C5
Hot rolling of an aluminum alloy: A commercially available 3000 aluminum was used in this phase of the study. Strips were prepared, in 6.12 - 6.16mm thickness, 50 - 52 mm width and 310 mm in length, cut along the direction of rolling of the plates. The chemical composition of the strips is given in Table 9.15. The surface roughness of the strips, as delivered, was in the order of 0.3 fjm. Each strip has a type K (chromel-alumel) thermocouple embedded to a depth of 15 mm in its tail end. Table 9.15 The chemical composition of the material (weight %) Mn Fe Zn Si Mg 1.00 0.63 0.016 .20 0.005
Cu 0.097
Al remainder
Lubricants with different emulsion concentration are used in the hot rolling tests. The base oil is one of two kinds of natural and semi-synthetic oil. The lubricants are made of four base oils, referred to as natural A, natural B, semi-synthetic A and semi-synthetic B. In the case of natural oil, the lubricants were prepared with water and 1% and 3% of the oils by volume, and for semi-synthetic oil they were prepared of 1% and 10% of the oils by volume. Lubricant A KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
314 was designed for low friction application and B for higher friction. Both lubricants are based on synthetic esters. The viscosities of the oils at 40 °C and 100 °C are given in the Table 9.16.
Table 9.16 lubricant Natural A Natural B Semi-synthetic A Semi-synthetic B
density (g/ml) 0.904 0.914 0.886 0.883
viscosity at 40°C (mm^/s) 37.9 76.3 28.5 29.6
viscosity at 100°C (mmVs) 5.5 8.6 5.5 5.7
A two-high mill having rolls of 250 mm diameter and 100 mm length, driven by a DC motor of 42 kW power is used. The rolls are hardened to Rc=52 and are ground circumferentially to a surface finish of Ra=0.18 jiim. Two industrial hot-air guns are used to heat the rolls to approximately 90°C. The roll force is measured by two load cells located under the bearing blocks of the lower roll. Two torque transducers in drive spindles measure the roll torque of the upper and lower rolls. The roll speed is measured by a digital shaft encoder, installed in the top drive spindle. In order to measure the forward slip, two photosensitive diodes are installed at exit a known distance apart, the signals of which allow the determination of the exit strip velocity, leading to the original definition of the forward slip. Two reductions of nominally 15 and 35% magnitude are used. The rolling speed is varied from a low of 20 rpm to 160 rpm, giving surface velocities of 0.26 and 2.1 m/s, the higher value of which is near commercial operating speeds. Flow stress prediction: The purpose of modeling is to develop an effective representation of material behavior at high temperatures. From each set of compression test data, 15 data points were picked in equal strain intervals of 0.05. The total number of training data sets for 13 conditions is 195. Conditions B2 and B4 were set aside as network generalization test data and the rest of the patterns were used in training the network. All the input and output values were normalized into the range [-0.9 to 0.9], to avoid premature saturation of the sigmoid function. The learning rate and momentum rate were both initially set to 0.5, then incremented to 0.9. The learning rate of 0.9, with a momentum rate of 0.7, resulted in the fastest convergence. The logistic sigmoid function with a constant steepness factor of 0.5 was chosen as the activation function. Both one hidden layer and two hidden layer networks were examined to investigate the effect of extra hidden layers. The error measure for network performance evaluation was the mean relative error of all the training data points. It was found that the two-hidden layer topology has no advantage over one hidden layer for equal numbers of total processing nodes. Increasing the number of hidden nodes to five increased the accuracy, however, further increase in the number of hidden nodes had no considerable benefit. Therefore, the five hidden nodes network was concluded to be the most efficient design. Training results after 5,000 iterations are shown in Table 9.17. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
315 Table 9.17 Mean relative error in the prediction of the flow stress - training data temperature (°C) mean relative error (%) 400 2.584 450 2.218 500 1.799 The plot in Figure 9.11 shows the comparison of the experimental values of flow stress with those predicted by the use of the fully trained neural network, at the strain rate of 5.04 s'\ It is found that the predicted flow curves follow the experimental flow curves very closely. The mean relative error was calculated to be less than 1.9%. Similar accuracy was also found at other strain rates. This clearly indicates that the network was able to learn accurately the training data set. The main quality indicator of a neural network is its generalization ability, that is, its ability to predict accurately the output of unseen test data. The network was trained using data at 400°C and 500°C; and then tested and compared using the data at 450°C, shown in Figure 9.12. Good predictive ability was observed. The mean relative error was found to be 2.83%. This error is less than the errors that usually arise in flow stress measurements due to unavoidable variations in temperature, strain rate, and interfacial frictional resistance. 50[8=5.04 s-*]
(£=7.58 s-^3
Temperature
Temperature
ir^y-*-^^^^^^ 400 "C ^4> • » t - ^ 400 °C
450'C »-.^-» w w n-K 500 *C
Neural network Experiment 1
0.00
0.20
\
\
0.40 0.60 true strain
1
0.80
Figure 9.11 The predictions of the neural network
neural network experiment
10 H
1.00
0-f 0.00
-]
0.20
\
1
0.40 0.60 true strain
\
0.80
1.00
Figure 9.12 The predictions of the neural network on unseen data
Roll force prediction: A data base of the roll separating forces and roll torque during hot rolling of the 3000 aluminum alloy strips was developed, as described above. In the first step of neural network modeling, the effect of the lubricant type was excluded, and a network was trained to predict roll forces for a given lubricant. The model inputs were: reduction, roll KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
316
_ « _ «
speed, strip temperature, and emulsion concentration. The network was trained using 45 data points, and learned the force variation very closely. The predictive ability of the network was then tested and the results of these computations are shown using the solid diamonds. The network roll force prediction for Natural-A lubricant is shown in Figure 9.13. The maximum relative error during testing was approximately 10% with a mean relative error of 4.1%. Again, this level of error is satisfactory and smaller than errors that normally arise due to experimental variations and the accuracy of instrumentation. After successful development of the model for a given lubricant, the lubricant type was incorporated into the force prediction model. A configuration of one hidden layer with 8 nodes, five input and one output node with a learning rate of 0.7 and momentum rate of 0.7, was found to perform best. After 10000 iterations, the network converged to a solution and fiirther iterations had an insignificant effect on error reduction. The results are given in Figure 9.14 for two sets of reductions, 15% and 35%, at various rolling velocities. The emulsion contained 3%, by volume, of the Natural-A lubricant. The trained network predicted the roll force for 66% of conditions within 5% relative error band, 95% within 10% error band, and only three of the conditions were predicted with errors up to a maximum of 13%. As observed, the predictive ability of the network is satisfactory. The average error, obtained while testing the network, is 4.46% and 3.77%, respectively, for the two reductions, lower than is usually obtained usingthe more classical modeling methods.
1.60-
1.60 Nominal reduction = 32% Natural A lubricant 3% emulsion concentration! [ 4.1% average error ;
1.40 1.20-
1 1.00 10 .0
feVAo^V
I 1.00
r ^ o V %^** •V*^*
t .
0.80
£
0.60-
40 60 80 experiment number
0.80-1
i 0.40 H E 0.20
0.20 20
i*xwwSy
O Training data -15% reduction • Testing data -15% reduction
o Training data • Testing data
0.40
Natural A lubricant 3% emulsion concentration 4.46% average enror at 15% 3.77% average error at 35%
fi 1.40 "o i 1.20
100
Figure 9.13 Testing and training data for roll force
D Training data - 35% reduction • Testing data - 35% reduction -1 10
\ \ T" 20 30 40 experiment number
50
Figure 9.14 Testing and training data for 15% and 35% reductions
Roll torque prediction: A network with one hidden layer is applied in the prediction of roll torque, with five input parameters and one output parameter. The experimental matrix included 66 data points, of which 45 were used for network training and 21 were randomly selected to test the performance of the trained neural network. The learning rate and momentum rate were both initially set to 0.3 and then increased to 0.9. One hidden layer with 8 MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
317 nodes was found to perform best with a learning rate 0.7 and momentum rate of 0.7 for the optimal condition.. The training and testing results, after 15000 iterations, produced relative errors within a 10% error band, shown in Figure 9.15. The network also predicted well the test data, with errors less than 10%. The points with high relative error are the training data.
1.60 B
1.40 H
•o
1.20
o Training data • Testing data
1.00
"^^^VnT
0.80 H
0.60-1 0.40 0.20
Nominal reduction = 32% Natural A lubricant 3% emulsion concentration [ 4.18% average error, training —I 20
I I ^ 40 60 80 experiment number
100
Figure 9.15 Testing and training data for roll torque
Traditional models: Empirical models, one-dimensional models and finite-element based models have been used in a large number of publications to predict roll forces and torques, in addition to other variables of importance in the flat rolling process. The predictions of these have been shown to be reasonably accurate and consistent, providing the metal* s resistance to deformation, as well as the boundary and initial conditions have been described in an adequate manner. The material's flow strength may be measured with good accuracy and may be modeled using well established constitutive models. The problems encountered concern the boundary conditions; specifically the coefficients of friction and heat transfer at the roll/workpiece contact surface, which are notoriously difficult to measure. Using inappropriate magnitudes inevitably results in poor predictions. Thus, this is one of the major advantages of the neural network approach: neither of these parameters must be known to produce accurate modeling. The small price to pay for the accuracy is the lack of an empirical relation which may be used in thefixture,however, as long as a computer and the software are available, that relation is no longer necessary. 9.6.7
Comparison to statistical methods
A limited amount of comparison of the predictions a neural networks and statistical methods has been performed and the results are shown in Figure 9.16. The work was done to KNOWLEDGE BASED MODELING
318
model the constitutive behavior of a microalloyed steel, subjected to compression at high temperatures (875°C) and at constant, true rates of strain (0.01, 0.1 and 1 s'\ respectively) . The flow curves are shown in the figure. A large number of tests were conducted and a back propagation neural network was trained to predict the stress-strain curves. As well, non-linear regression analysis was performed to model the metals' behavior. The comparison shows that the predictions of the neural network are somewhat better than that of the statistical analysis. The mean difference of the predictions of the neural network was 2.17%, while the statistical approach gave a mean difference of 2.99%.
250 200 e
150 100
0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 true strain
1
Figure 9.16 A comparison of the predictions of the neural network, non-linear regression analysis and the experiments.
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPER TIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
319
Chapter 10\ Conclusions The objectives of this publication were to discuss, in a fairly comprehensive manner, the problems associated with the production oi designer steels, defined as those demanded by the customer to fit exacting specifications. These may include the predetermined chemical composition, the yield strength, the ductility or formability, the texture, the ferrite, pearlite or bainite structure with a certain grain size and the precipitates. Geometrical accuracy and consistency and superior surface quality are also required of the products. The possibilities of satisfying the customer completely at the present time were discussed in terms of the technological difficulties the receipt of such an order would pose. The first part of the study, leading up to this book, involved the collection of opinions of engineers of several steel companies, regarding the treatment the demands of a customer would receive. The majority of responses indicated that the order would be matched to the company's product list and the steel whose attributes are closest to the one requested would be offered. There was one exception, in which the respondent commented: "of course we could satisfy the customer, exactly. However, the costs of the development of the new steel, the design of the processing schedule, the testing sequence to prove that the request has been matched, etc. would have to covered." The conclusion was that at the present time, engineers are capable of developing new alloys and processes but the associated costs are prohibitive. The information presented in the book has been designed to indicate the reasons for the expenses and to aid in the process to overcome the difficulties and to reduce the expenses. The importance of the steel industry to a. nation's economic well-being is discussed in Chapter 1. The steel industry has been around for quite some time and it is well known. Its contribution to the gross national product and to the gross domestic product has been well documented and acknowledged. The basic ideas of the rolling process have not changed since its inception, several hundred years ago. The level of technology and the demands it is to satisfy have changed in very significant terms, though. High technology has been introduced in hot strip mills and cold mills. Use of the most advanced data acquisition systems, predictiveadaptive computer control software and material testing techniques are now available and, at least in modem mills, are in constant use. The results have been spectacular in several ways. Productivity has increased and the number of person-hours to produce and roll a ton of steel steadily decreased. The associated human cost is also notable as the total number of steel workers has shrunk. In light of continuously increasing competition further improvements are still needed, however, and these indicate that even more innovations and changes are going to be introduced. These should include improved process control, based on better understanding of the phenomena involved in the rolling process. The phenomena contributing to the quality of the product are discussed next. These include the conditions at the interface between the work roll and the rolled metal, the location where the transfer of mechanical and thermal energy takes place, in addition to the material's
320 resistance to deformation. The first of these is treated in Chapter 2 where tribology is defined to include fiiction, lubrication, heat transfer and their effect on the process and the product: the wear of work rolls and the defects of the surface of the strips. Friction is discussed first. The methods used to determine the magnitude of the coeflBcient, either its average value or its variation through the roll gap, are critically discussed and the lack of applicability of bench tests to the rolling process is mentioned. The parameters and variables, involved with the process and with the material, that define and affect it are listed. The effects of some of these on the coefficient of fiiction are given, including the effect of the load, relative velocity, temperature and the roughness. In general, the coefficient of fiiction increases when the surface roughness increases. It is reduced when the relative velocity is increased. The effects of the temperature and the load are not as straightforward as the interaction of several variables are to be considered. When steel strips are rolled, increasing the reduction and hence, the load, results in decreasing coefficients of fiiction. When soft aluminum is rolled, increasing loads cause increasing fiictional resistance. The effect of the temperature also depends on more than one variable as the thickness of the scale and its chemical composition contribute to the magnitude of fiictional forces. Considering carbon and alloy steels, increasing temperatures appear to reduce fiiction. When aluminum is hot rolled with no lubricants, fiiction increases with temperature. Introducing lubricants brings in additional variables, including the viscosity, the viscositypressure and the viscosity-temperature parameters, and the oil film thickness. The following may then be concluded: M. decreases when the relative velocity increases because: • more oil is drawn in the contact zone; and • less time is available to form adhesive bonds. [i is affected by the interfacial pressure because: • higher pressures increase the viscosity; • higher viscosity decreases ji; • higher pressures decrease (i in the boundary and mixed regimes but increase it under hydrodynamic conditions; and • the effect of increasing number of bonds is counteracted by the effect of pressure. Softer metals create more bonds so the opposite effect may be observed; the interaction of the rate of change of the two mechanisms - rate of increase of viscosity and the rate of increase of the bonds - will influence whether \i increases or decreases with pressure. |Li is affected bv the direction as well as the magnitude of the roughness: • roughness direction around the roll: oil is not distributed and no effect is observed; • roughness direction along the roll: oil is distributed better and the changes depend on the nature of the lubrication regime; and • best direction: random roughness direction, obtained possibly by surface EDM. The magnitude of the coefficient of friction, during dry rolling of soft aluminum is in the range of 0.15 - 0.3. During dry rolling of steel somewhat higher magnitudes are observed. When lubricants, either in solid form or as emulsions, are introduced, the magnitudes decrease THE MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
321 and the coefficient varies from a low of 0.03 to a high of 0.2. At hot rolling temperatures, the coefficient of friction varies between 0.15 and 0.45, lower than suggested by earlier studies. The heat transfer coefficient was examined next. Published values of the coefficients were reviewed and results obtained in a laboratory setting were presented. Since the heat transfer coefficient affects surface phenomena as well, it was expected to be dependent on the same process and material parameters as was friction, including the reduction, rubbing velocity, temperature, real contact area and the presence of scales and/or lubricants. The heat transfer coefficient at the roll/strip interface was much more dependent, than was friction, on the conditions of the surface, however. Some specific recommendations for the magnitude of the heat transfer coefficient, to be used in modeling the rolling process, may be made at this point. When cold rolling aluminum in a laboratory, using a small experimental mill of 150 - 250 mm diameter, a magnitude of 20000 to 30000 W W K appears to be appropriate. During cold rolling of steel similar numbers may be used. When hot rolling of carbon steel is to be modeled, using rolls of 150 - 175 mm diameter, the best magnitude of the heat transfer coefficient is 7000 - 8000 W W K . In hot strip mills, the corresponding numbers vary from 50000 to 90000 W W K . AS for friction, the presence or absence of a layer of scale and its mechanical and thermal attributes will have a significant effect on the numbers. Roll cooling, whether using water or oil-in-water emulsions, will also contribute to surface heat transfer. As with friction, the coefficient of heat transfer may be determined using the inverse method or it may be inferred from temperature measurements. When the inverse method is used, measured temperature data are to be matched with calculations and the coefficient that gives the best match is chosen. When measurements of the temperature changes of the strip and the roll are available, the coefficient may be calculated directly. Both approaches require care and both are error-prone. The error bands associated with the results of either technique should be studied and should be taken into account. In an ideal situation, empirical relations for the two coefficients, in terms of the significant parameters, would be helpful. The relation, due to Wankhede and Samarasekera (1997), is one of those available, in which the coefficient of heat transfer is related to the roll pressure. New equations should be developed that include the effect of the other significant parameters on the coefficients as well. The most important parameters are the load, the temperature and the relative velocity of the contacting surfaces. At high temperatures, the layer of the scales should be included in the formulation. The equations may be obtained using statistical methods, or a neural network may be trained for prediction. Roll wear is caused by contact at the roll/strip interface and is inevitable. Understanding the causes would help in reducing the rate of wear of the rolls, and would lead to cost savings. An empirical relation, given by Roberts (1983), appears to estimate roll wear quite well. The surfaces of worn rolls indicate that wear is not uniform. Its dependence on the pressure, temperature, friction and transfer of heat is cleariy observable. The rate of wear and the need for roll changes could be predicted if the relations, referred to above, were available. The case studies in Chapter 2 concentrate on the effect of lubricants on the rolling process. Aluminum and steel strips, at low and high temperatures are considered. Dry and lubricated passes are examined. As expected, lubricants reduce the loads on the mill, quite considerably, by 20-30%. The use of lauryl and stearyl alcohols and lauric and stearic acids in rolling of aluminum strips is examined. Alcohols appear to be more useful than acids as boundary CONCLUSIONS
322 additives. The chapter closes with a description of the philosophy used in the formulation of the mechanical and thermal boundary conditions of the flat rolling process. The other parameter whose accurate determination and mathematical representation will affect the predictive abilities of the models of the rolling process is the metal's resistance to deformation, discussed in Chapter 3. There are two objectives in requiring this information. The first is to study the constitutive behavior of the metal. The shape of the true stress-true strain curve can be used to infer the metallurgical phenomena occurring during the process. The relative contributions of the hardening and restoration mechanisms are observable on the curves and, of course, can be substantiated by metallography. The second, and more relevant in the present context, is to use the information, gathered in a systematic set of tests, to model the rolling process. The methods for the determination of the metals' flow strength and the difiicuhies encountered are presented first. The available experiments include the tension, compression and torsion tests. The relative advantages and disadvantages are presented and the conclusion drawn suggests that the test chosen should try to reproduce the state of stress, strain and strain rate, existing in the actual process. For rolling, this points to the use of plane strain compression, in which the stress and strain distributions are close to that in rolling, provided the geometry of the sample and the compression platens are selected with care: the shape factors of the compression and the rolling processes should be similar. When single passes are to be studied, straining is not excessive and the compression process can simulate rolling adequately. When the complete strip rolling process, including the roughing and the finishing stages, is to be simulated the large strains obtainable in the torsion test make it the preferred route to follow, in spite of the problems associated with the dependence of the distribution of the field variables on the radius of the sample. Most of the difficulties associated with the tests concern the measurement of temperature. Thermocouples, embedded in the sample are useful but they disturb the heat flow and introduce stress concentration. Optical pyrometers measure surface temperature only. Both instruments respond fast to changes but the response is not instantaneous. It is inevitable that one will have to accept temperature data that is close to the actual values but which carries some experimental scatter, the magnitude of which will determine the observed temperature sensitivity of the material's resistance to deformation. The rate of strain is to be kept constant during the testing process. This is fairly simple when torsion is the technique. When compression of plane or axially symmetrical samples is used, computer control of the process is necessary. After the stress-strain curves have been determined, their behavior is traditionally represented by a mathematical model. At low temperatures, the flow strength is usually treated as dependent on the strain only, and equations that represent the strain hardening curve are not too difficult to find. At high temperatures, there are a large number of available relations. The parameters that affect the strength now include the strain, the rate of strain and the temperature as well and in several instances, the chemical composition and metallurgical parameters are also involved. The most successful relation appears to be the hyperbolic sine form, attributed to Arrhenius, a Swedish chemist. The Arrhenius equation includes the rate of strain, the peak strength, the temperature and the activation energy for deformation as the parameters, in addition to several THE MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
323
material constants. These constants have often been expressed in terms of the strain, thus bringing in another variable. A simple empirical relation that describes the resistance to deformation of carbon steels is due to Shida. This equation includes the strain, the rate of strain, temperature and the carbon content and has been used successfully in modeling the hot rolling process. When the carbon content is replaced by the carbon equivalent, the equation is also usable for alloy steels. The case studies of Chapter 3 include a presentation of the true stress-true strain curves of a low niobium steel, indicating the metallurgical phenomena. A description of a method to determine the activation energy of deformation from experimental data follows. A few specific set of constants, collected from the technical literature for use in the hyperbolic sine equation, is also given. The information concerning the boundary conditions of the rolling process, given in Chapter 2, and the initial conditions, given in Chapter 3, are put to use by the mathematical models, presented in Chapters 4 and 5. One-dimensional modeling, applicable when the ratio of the roll diameter to the thickness of the rolled strip is large, is the topic in Chapter 4. In this chapter, the possible objectives of modeling the rolling process are given. These include the design of the rolling mills and/or the rolling schedule. An empirical model, giving the roll separating force as a function of the geometry of the roll gap, friction and the metal's average flow strength in the pass, is described first. The traditional models are presented next, beginning with the Orowan model, dating back to 1943. That model was and continues to be quite successful when roll separating forces and roll torques are to be determined. Its success in describing the rolling process, of course, is dependent on the proper use of the informationfromthe previous two chapters. Using Orowan's model without computers was time consuming and several variations have since been developed by simplifying Orowan's equations. The simplifications carry a price tag in some loss of accuracy and consistency. One of the models in widespread use is Sims' relations for hot rolling, based on the assumption of the existence of sticking friction in the roll gap. The second, developed for cold rolling, is due to Bland and Ford, also based on the Orowan model and also obtained by using some simplifications. All three models have drawbacks. The most significant of these is that all are based on the fiiction hill idea, and this makes their predictions highly unrealistic when large rolls are used to roll thin, hard metals. The models simply do not produce usable results. Still using the friction hill, but introducing somefiirtherrefinements is the model, developed by Rouchoudhury and Lenard. The deformation of the roll and the elastic entry and exit regions are analyzed by using the theory of elasticity in the method. A further refinement, that avoids the use of the friction hill, is also shown in Chapter 4. The presentation of the models is followed by an examination of the sensitivity of the predictions to several parameters. As friction and the reduction increase so do the roll force and the torque. Increasing roll radius and entry thickness also cause larger mill loads. This information may be taken into consideration when the mills are designed. The predictive ability of some of these models is given in the last section. Data, obtained from cold and hot rolling tests are used. In each of the calculations, the coefficient of friction is chosen such that the calculated and measured roll force should agree closely. By choosing the coefficient carefully, all models are able to predict the roll force well. The technique that avoids CONCLUSIONS
324 the friction hill and employs the "shooting problem" approach is the only one that successfully calculates the roll force, the torque and the forward slip. Chapter 4 closes with the argument that the ability of any model to predict significant parameters should not be tested in a one-to-one situation, by measuring and calculating a few parameters. Instead, one should use statistical methods and calculate the average and the st2mdard deviation of the differences of the predictions and the measurements to verify the accuracy and the consistency of the predictive abilities. As well, the mathematical rigor of all components, including the field equations, boundary conditions and the metals' resistance to deformation, should be at the same level. Thefinite-elementmethod is discussed in Chapter 5. After a few historical notes, the solid state incremental approach and the flow formulation are mentioned as the two approaches usually followed. The flow formulation is used in the present book. The principles of the rigidplastic and the elastic-plastic formulations are detailed next and the advantages and disadvantages are given. Also, the instances when one or the other should be applied are presented. The distributions of the velocities, strains, strain rates and temperatures are predicted to be similar by the two techniques. The surface stress distributions are not comparable and when those are required, use of the elastic-plastic model and an elastic-plastic stress-strain relation for the material model are recommended. Several constitutive models, for use in the FE method are mentioned, including the NortonHoff law, the Sellars-Tegart law and the Prandtl-Reuss relations. The equations that describe the transfer of heat at the contact surfaces and the boundary conditions are also shown, including the thermal properties of several materials. The importance of including in the computations the temperature dependence of the thermal properties is emphasized. Three applications are described in the case studies. The first concerns hot, flat rolling of steel. The ability of the method is demonstrated by showing the computed distributions of the effective strain, effective strain rate, effective shear strain rate, the average stress and the temperature. The passage of a steel strip through a hot strip mill, accountmg for the events at the roughing mill, the descaler, thefinishingmill, and laminar water cooling, follows. The next topic is asymmetrical rolling. Two models are validated. The first is the elasticplastic non-steady state model of Pillinger and the second is therigid-plasticmodel, described in Chapter 5. Cold rolling of aluminum plates and hot rolling of steel are studied. The dimensional changes at the exit of plates, rolled using various work roll diameter ratios are calculated. The effects of different coefficients of friction at the contact with the top and with the bottom roll and different roll diameter ratios are given. The last of the case studies deals with the closure of porosities during rolling of continuously cast slabs. The effect of the entrapped gases on closure is studied. The calculations are in good quantitative agreement with published data. The major part of the effort to create steels to match exacting mechanical and metallurgical specifications is dependent on the ability to plan the draft schedule for a particular mill, such that the aims are realized. This may be accomplished by off'-line modeling of the process, making use of relations, proposed to track the metallurgical phenomena as the rolling process continues. Chapter 6 deals with these events in presenting the state-of-the-art, describing the mathematical models for the evolution of the microstructure and the development of the attributes of the cooled product. These descriptions are possible by carefiil analysis of the critical temperatures: the precipitation start and stop temperature, the recrystallization start and THE MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
325
stop temperature and the transformation start and stop temperature and the effects process and material parameters exert on them. The microstructure of the steel may change statically, dynamically or, when the changes that are initiated during loading are followed by the removal of the loads, metadynamically. The equations available to track these changes are detailed in the chapter. The parameters and variables are identified, including the history of thermal events, the initial austenite grain size, the potential for precipitation and recrystallization. These equations are empirical in nature. They contain coefficients and exponents and their forms are quite arbitrary. Most of them make use of the exponential nature of phenomena that are activated by thermal energy. These coefficients and exponents are given in Chapter 6, in a large number of tables, for a variety of steels and conditions. A flow chart, designed to examine and track the evolution of the microstructure of a steel, alloyed with niobium, is offered. Thermal-mechanical treatment of the steels during hot rolling is discussed in terms of that flow chart. The model calculates whether full or partial recrystallization occurred, and whether precipitation affected the softening processes. After hot rolling, cooling, at some rate, follows. Transformation and precipitation during the cooling period are the two metallurgical mechanisms that determine the attributes of the product after it reaches room temperatures. The relations, provided to evaluate the sizes and the distributions of the ferrite, pearlite or bainite structures, and the yield and tensile strengths, are given. The model to trace the evolution of the structure is applied in several examples. Hot flat rolling of plates and strips are examined. The possibilities of optimizing the draft schedule are explored. Plate rolling is studied in the first of the case studies. The roughing and finishing stages are considered, and the calculated and measured roll forces and temperatures are compared. The sizes of the austenite grains, during the 12-pass process, are calculated. The predictions and the measurements compare well. The next example concerns hot strip rolling. The effect of the interpass time on the finish temperature, the size of the austenite and ferrite grains and on the yield strength after cooling is demonstrated. The application of mathematical modeling to three-dimensional problems is demonstrated in Chapter 7, dealing with shape rolling. Planning the details of this process, in spite of the large amount of scrutiny and study they received, is still considered an art, not science. The problems and the unknowns are daunting. They involve the ability of the hot metal to fill the grooves of the rolls and the attendant effects of the process and material parameters. Finiteelement analysis can reduce these difficulties. The problems that remain are connected with the boundary conditions, that is, the coefficients of friction and heat transfer at the contact surfaces, which in the case of shape rolling, are the basic unknowns. The question has been raised before: how exactly are these coefficients affected by the process parameters? The application of three-dimensional analysis to shape rolling is extremely time-consuming. The method, presented in Chapter 7, is designed to reduce the time needed while retaining the ability to provide the distributions of thefieldvariables in the deformation zone. The application of a fairly new approach, the evaluation of parameters by a form of inverse analysis, to the flat rolling process is described in Chapter 8. The method is used to determine material constants in constitutive behavior or in boundary conditions. It is also applicable to compute thermal properties. The focus of the chapter is the former topic: the evaluation of rheological parameters in modeling material behavior. After giving the general principles of the CONCLUSIONS
326 technique, some of the components are discussed. These include the minimization processes, search methods, scaling, convergence and constraints. The applications deal with hot forming of aluminum and steel and the determination of parameters in equations, that deal with the evolution of the microstructure. The method is shown to be powerful in describing the processes. Knowledge based modeling, using artificial intelligence, expert systems and neural networks, as applied to flat rolling of steels, is presented in Chapter 9. There is no unique method for knowledge based modeling of rolling processes, especially on the industry level, however, the knowledge based modeling is a promising approach. Expert systems and neural networks can be used very efficiently to cover the gaps and the unknowns in physically based mathematical modeling. The acquisition of knowledge is discussed. Data mining, as applied to the flat rolling process is presented. Self organizing maps (SOM) are given and their output is examined. The possibilities in finding the influence of one parameter on another, using the SOM, are also described. Steps in improving the product quality in a rolling mill, using as minimum a three-level computer control with data acquisition about each strip are given in Chapter 9. These are: • finding the relevant data influencing the required quality parameters using methods of data mining, for example, SOM; • setting up the conventional neural network models for model experiments; and • validation of the models and optimizing the model using fiizzy logic. Neural networks provide a powerful mechanism which is able to handle databases in an efficient manner. In the case studies, the back propagation learning algorithm is utilized to train feedforward neural networks to store and predict the flow stresses of six steels at elevated temperatures. The chemical compositions (C, Mn, Si and Nb) and three process variables (temperature, strain rate and strain) are selected as input variables and the only output is the strength. The accuracy of predictions and the adaptability of the neural networks are examined and illustrated by using different training pairs. Several conclusions are drawn, as follows: • • •
•
For fixed training pairs an optimum number of nodes in the hidden layer exists; When the carbon equivalent, Ccq, is selected as input variable to replace other two chemical compositions, C and Mn, the quality of training is lower; A convergence algorithm is designed to make the neural network adjust the learning factor automatically. In this algorithm, the learning factor is reduced by multiplying it by a constant ratio when the convergence rate is below a specific value. Compared with the algorithm using a constant learning factor, this approach can save one sixth of the learning time without losing accuracy; After 60000 iterations, this algorithm shows very good training results; the average of errors is 0.05703% and the standard deviation of errors is only 3.0754%;
The well-trained neural network can predict flow stresses at internal strains, which are in between the sampling strains used for training, for all conditions very successfully. The flow stresses ofconditions not included in the training pairs, are also used for testing. The neural network can interpolate the flow stresses very well for the conditions no matter where they are THE MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
"
327 located in the matrix, provided the information for interpolation is sufficient in the training pairs. But the capability of extrapolation of the well-trained neural network is not very good. A second neural network is trained by new training pairs which are selected randomly from the experimental data. The accuracy of prediction is significantly improved when it is tested by the same groups of testing data. It is concluded that the selection of input data for the training pairs is important in improving the predictive ability and is critical in avoiding the need for extrapolation. The second case study deals with a new method, involving three neural networks combined with Alexander's force model to predict the roll force during hot rolling. The first neural network is used to model the average flow stresses in the austenite and ferrite regions, a traditionally difficuU problem. The model is shown to have an accuracy better than ±10%. A second neural network is utilized to handle a database of the average temperatures in the roll bite, which is generated by the finite-element program, elroW, described in Chapter 5. The relative errors of the second network, for 99.5% of the data are within ±1.3%. The errors of predictions by Alexander's model are improved by adaptive calculations of the geometric multiplier (Qp) which is shown to depend on the process variables. A database of Qp is then built up from experimental data and third neural network, called adaptive network, is used to handle this database. In the proposed technique, the average temperature which determines the flow stress in roll bite is calculated by the temperature network, the flow stress is predicted by the flow stress network and the Qp term is predicted by the adaptive network. Finally, the roll force is calculated by Alexander's model. The testing results from the first group of testing data show that compared with the resuhs predicted directly by Alexander's model, the accuracy of predicted roll force by the adaptive network is significantly improved. The testing results from the second group of testing data show that although the prediction for the first slab is not impressive, the adaptive network can improve the accuracy for the second slab efficiently after appropriate adaptive learning. For the third and fourth slabs, not only are the required iterations reduced, but the accuracy is also improved. In the third study, the back propagation learning algorithm is used to predict the flow stress, roll force and the roll torque during the hot compression and rolling of two aluminum alloys. First, the ability of the network to reproduce the experimental results is tested and the ability of the model is found to be impressive. The network is then presented with data, not used in the training process and again, its predictive ability is shown to be good. The network is then trained to predict the roll separating forces during hot rolling of aluminum strips, lubricated with various emulsions. The predictions, when tested against unseen data, are within ± 10%. The same conclusions are reached when the predicted and measured roll torques are compared. The major competitor of the neural network approach to predictions is the use of non-linear regression analysis. The predictions of the network are compared to those of a statistical approach and the neural network method appears to be superior. The neural network based model clearly indicates that it is able to learn the training data set and accurately predict the output of unseen test data. Well-trained neural network models provide fast, accurate and consistent results, making them superior to all other techniques. A general conclusion, when either mathematical or physical modeling of the rolling process is considered and the aim is to satisfy the demands of customers, may be given here. It is
CONCLUSIONS
328 possible to produce what the customer wants, exactly. The methods, while there is room for improvement, exist now. The process would be expensive but definitely possible. There is need for further studies, of course. A data base, involving a large number of materials should be compiled. Using careful testing, the constants and coefficients in the relations for constitutive and metallurgical behavior should be developed. Systematic testing to determine the exact dependence of the boundary conditions on process and material parameters should be conducted and another data base should be prepared. These data bases could then be used in the models now available to study hot or cold deformation processing. These steps are necessary to ascertain that the designer steels are available.
THE MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
329
References Ackert, R., private communication, 1994. ACQUIRE, http://vw.com/ai/ Adebanjo, R.O., Miller, A.K. and Too, J.J.M., 1990, Constitutive Modelling of the Effects of Recrystallization on the Flow Behaviour of Steel, Mathematical Modelling of Hot Rolling of Steel, ed. S. Yue, CIM, 252-258. Alexander, J.M, 1972, On the Theory of Rolling, R. Soc. London, 326, 535-563. Al-Salehi, F.A.K., Firbank, T.C. and Lancaster, P.G., 1973, "An Experimental Determination of the Roll Pressure Distribution in Cold Rolling," Int. Journal Mech. Sci., Vol. 15, pp. 693-710. Annual Statistical Report, AISI, 1994 Alden, T.H., 1987, Theory of Mobile Dislocation Density: Application to the Deformation of 304 Stainless Steel, Metall. Trans. A, 18A, 51-62. Altan, T. and Boulger, F.W., 1973, Flow Stress of Metals and its Application in Metal Forming Analysis, ASME, J. Eng. Ind., 95, 1009-1019. Anan, C, Nakajima, S., Miyahara, M., Nanba, S., Umemoto, M., Hiramatsu, A., Moriya, A. and Watanabe, T., 1992, A Model for Recovery and Recrystallization of Hot Deformed Austenite Considering Structural Heterogeneity, ISIJ Int., 32, 261-266. Atack, P. A. and Abbott, M.R., 1986, Application of Mathematical Models to Tandem Mills Hot Rolling Aluminium Sheet, Proc. Int. Symp. On Plasticity and Resistance to Metal Deformation, Heceg Novi, 334. Avitzur. B., 1968, Metal Forming: Processes and Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York. Avitzur, B. and Kohser, R, 1978, "Disk and Strip Forging for the Determination of Friction and Flow Strength Values," ASLE, Trans. 21,143-151. Azushima, A., 1978, "Characteristics of Lubrication in Cold Sheet Rolling", Lubrication Challenges in Metalworking and Processing, Proc. of 1st Int. Conf, IIT Research Inst., Chicago, 81-87. Backofen, W.A., 1972, Deformation Processing, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading. Bai, D.Q., Yue, S., Sun, W.P., and Jonas, J.J., 1993, Effect of Deformation Parameters on the No-Recrystallization Temperature inNb-Bearing Steels, Metall. Trans. A., 22A, 2151-2159. Baker, T.N., 1979, in: Hot Working and Forming Processes, (eds), Davis, G.J. and Sellars, CM., London, 32-37 Baker, T.N. and McPherson, 1979, Effect of Solution Temperature and Rolling Schedule on Niobium Steel Controlled-Rolled into Ferrite Temperature Range, Met. Sci., 11,611-618.
330
Banerji, A. and Rice, W.B., 1972, Experimental Determination of Normal Pressure and Friction Stress in the Rolling Gap During Cold Rolling, Annals of the CIRP, 21, 53-54. Baragar, D.L., 1987, The High Temperature and High Strain Rate Behaviour of a Plain Carbon and an HSLA Steel, J. Mech. Working Techn., 14, 295-307. Baragar, D.L. and Crawley, A.F., 1984, Frictional Effects on Flow Stress Determination at High Temperatures and Strain Rates, J. Mech. Working Techn., 9, 291-299. Barber, J.R., 1991, Is Modeling in Tribology a Useful Activity?, in Tribological Modeling for Mechanical Designers, ASTM STP 1105, (eds), Ludema K.C. and Bayer, R.G., ASTM, PA, 165-172. Batchelor, AW. and Stachowiak, G.W., 1995, Tribology in Materials Processing, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 48, 503-515. Bertrand-Corsini, C , Montmitonnet, P. and Chenot, J.L., 1989, A Three-Dimensional Analysis of Hot Rolling with Steady-State Thermomechanical Approach, Proc. NUMIFORM'89, eds, Thompson, E.G., Wood, R.D., Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Samuelsson, A., Fort Collins, 303-308. Beynon, J.H., Brown, P R , Mizban, S.I., Ponter, A.R.S. and Sellars, CM., 1986, Proc. NUMIFORM*86, (eds), Mattiasson K., Samuelsson, A. and Zienkiewicz, O.C, Gothenburg, 213-218. Beynon, J.H. and Sellars, CM., 1992, Modelling Microstructure and Its Effects during Muhipass Hot Rolling, ISIJ Int., 32, 359-367. Beynon, J.H., Li, X.K. and Ponter A.R.S., 1993, Inclusion of Dynamic Recrystallization in Process Models for Hot Working, Mat. Sci. Forum, 113-115,293-298. Birks, N. and Meier, G.H., 1983, Introduction to High Temperature Oxidation of Metals, Edward Arnold, London. Bland, DR. and Ford, H., 1948, The Calculation of Roll Force and Torque in Cold Strip Rolling with Tensions, Proc. I. Mech. E., 159,144-153. Blazevic, D.T., 1996, Tertiary Rolled in Scale - the Hot Strip Mill Problem of the 1990's, 37'*' MWSP Conf Proc., ISS-AIME, XXXIII, 33-38. Booser, E.R. (editor) 1984, CRC Handbook of Lubrication, Volume II, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. Boratto, F., Barbosa, R., Yue, S. and Jonas, J. J., 1988, Effect of Chemical Composition on the Critical Temperatures of Microalloyed Steels, Proc. THERMEC88, (ed.), Tamura, I., Tokyo. Bowden, F.P. and Tabor, D.,1950, The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Clarendon Press, Oxford. Bowden, F.P. and Tabor, D., 1973, Friction - An Introduction to Tribology, Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., London. Bresson, P., Couriot, E., Alexandre, F., and Haton, IP., 1993, Using Neuronal Network in Cold Rolling Process at Sollac Temper Mill, La Revue de Metallurgie-CIT, 7-8, 941-947.
MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
331 Brimacombe, J.K. and Samarasekera, I.V., 1989, Fundamental Analysis of the Continuous Casting Process for Quality Improvements, In: Thermomechanical Processing of Steel, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1989. Brown, S. and Wlassich, J., 1992, Application of Invariant Theory to Dynamic Recrystallization Constitutive Behaviour, Metall Trans. A, 23 A, 2091-2103. Bryant,G.F. and Chiu,T.S.L., 1982, Simplified Roll-Temperature Model: Convective Cooling, Metals Techn., 9, 478-484 Buchanan, B.G. and Shortliffe, E.H., 1985, Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project, Addison-Wesley, Reading. Buchmayr, B., Samoilov, A., Lachmann, L. and Aigmuller, G., 1993, A Fundamental TMCP Rolling Model for the Prediction and Optimization of Microstructure and Properties of HSLA Steels, Proc. Conf Modelling of Metal Rolling Processes, London, 134-148. Bugini, A., Gentili, E., Pacagnella, R and Restelli, G., The Evaluation of Friction in the Forging of Aluminium, 1978, Tranciatura Stampaggio, 15, 103-110. Burnet, M.E., 1986, Correlation of Forging Parameters to Microstructure and Mechanical Properties in Vanadium Modified 0.4% Carbon Steel, Proc. Symp., Fundamentals of Microalloying Forging Steels, (eds), Krauss, G. and Banerji, S.K., Golden, 601-615. Burte, P.R., Im, Y-T., Altan, T. and Semiatin, S.L., 1990, Measurement and Analysis of Heat Transfer and Friction During Hot Forging, ASME, J. Eng. Ind., 112, 332-339. Cao, G.R., Hall, F.R., Hartley, P., Pillinger, L, Sturgess, C.E.N., Thompson, W. and Freshwater, L, 1993, Elastic-Plastic Finite-Element Analysis of Asymmetric Hot Rolling, Proc. Modelling of Metal Rolling Processes, London, 542-552. Carroll, C.W., 1961, The Created Response Surface Technique for Optimizing Non-Linear Parameters, Operations Res., 9,169-184. Chakrabarty, J., 1987, Theory of Plasticity, McGraw-Hill Inc., Toronto. Chen, B.K., Thomson, P.F., and Choi, S.K., 1992, Computer Modelling of Microstructure during Hot Flat Rolling of Aluminium, Mat. Sci. Techn., 8, 72-77. Chen, W.F. and Han, D.J., 1988, Plasticity for Structural Engineers, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Chen, C.C. and Kobayashi, S., 1978, Rigid Plastic Finite Element Analysis of Ring Compression, In: Application of Numerical Methods to Forming Processes, ASME, ADM, 28, 163-174. Chen, W.C., Samarasekera, I.V., and Hawbolt, E.B., 1993, Fundamental Phenomena Governing Heat Transfer During Rolling, Met. Trans. A, 24, 1307-1320. Chenot, J.-L. and Bellet, M., 1992, The Viscoplastic Approach for the Finite-Element Modelling of Metal Forming Processes, In,: Numerical Modelling of Material Deformation Processes, (eds). Hartley, P., Pillinger, I. and Sturges, C.E.N., Springer-Verlag, London, Berlin, 179-224. Cho, S., Cho, Y-J., Yoon, S., Cho, H., 1996, Improvement of Cold Mill Precalculation Accuracy using a Corrective Neural Network, Proc. of EANN'96, London, 45-48.
REFERENCES
332
^
Choquet, P., Fabregue, P., Giusti, J., Chamont, B., Pezant, J.N. and Blanchet, F, 1990, Modelling of Forces, Structure and Final Properties during the Hot Rolling Process on the Hot Strip Mill, Proc. Mathematical Modelling of Hot Rolling of Steel, (ed.), S. Yue, Hamilton, 3443. Codina, R., 1993, A Finite-Element Formulation for the Numerical Solution of the Convection-Diffusion Equation, Monograph CIMNE no. 14, Barcelona. Coldren, A.P., Biss, V. and Oakwood, T.G., 1981, Microstructural Changes during Thermomechanical Processing of X80 Pipeline Steels, in: Thermomechanical Processing of Microalloyed Austenite, (eds), DeArdo, A.J., Ratz, G.A. and Wray, P.J., The Met. Soc. of AIME, Pittsburgh, 591-611. Coleman, T, Dulieu, D. and Gouch, A., 1973, The Structure and Properties of Controlled Processed High Strength Ferrite-Pearlite Steels, Proc. 3"^^ Conf Strength of Metals and Alloys, London, vol. 1, 70-75. Concise Oxford Dictionary, 1995, Oxford University Press, Inc. Cser, L., 1991, Stand der Anwendung von Expertensystemen in der Umformtechnik, part 1; Umformtechnik 25,77-83 (in German) Cser, L., 1992, Stand der Anwendung von Expertensystemen in der Umformtechnik, part 2; Umformtechnik 26, 51-60 (in German) Cser, L., Lenard, J.G., Farkas, K. and Gyarmati, L, 1994, Object Oriented Knowledge Representation for Estimation of the Grain Size in Hot Rolling of Microalloyed Steels, Int. Conf MicroCAD*94, Miskolc, 156-165. Cser, L., Korhonen, A.S., Larkiola, J., Myllykoski, P., Simula, O. and Ahola, J.,1998, Application of Neural Networks for Modeling of Rolling and Annealing of Steel Strip, Proc. ESAFORM Conf, (eds) Chenot, J.L., Agassant, J.F., Montmitonnet, P., Vergnes, B. and Billon, N., Sophia-Antipolis, 251-254. Czichos, H., 1978, Tribology - A Systems Approach to the Science and Technology of Friction, Lubrication and Wear, Elsevier, Amsterdam. Dadras, P. and Wells W.R., 1984, ASME, J. Eng. Ind., 106, 187-195. Davies, C.H.J., 1994, Dynamics of the Evolution of Dislocation Populations, Scr. Metall. Mater., 30, 349-353. DePierre, V. and Gumey, F., 1974, A Method for Determination of Constant and Varying Friction Factors During Ring Compression Tests, ASME, J. Lubr. Techn., 96, 482-488. Derby, B., 1991, The Dependence of the Grain Size on Stress during Dynamic Recrystallization, Acta Metall., 39, 955-962. Devadas, C, Samarasekera, I.V. and Hawbolt, E.B., 1991, The Thermal and Metallurgical State of Steel Strip during Hot Rolling: Part III. Microstructural Evolution, Metall. Trans., 22A, 335-349. Devenpeck, M.L., and Rigo, J.H., 1983, Hot Ring Compression Tests for Evaluating Friction, in Compression Testing of Homogeneous Materials and Composites, ASTM STP 808, ed. R. Chait. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
^
333^
Dobrucki, W., 1962, Hipoteza tarda szczepno-poslizgowego na powierzchni styku cial sztywnych (narzedzi) z cialami elastoplastycznymi, Obr. Plast., 2, 449-488 (in Polish). Dollar, M., Bernstein, I.M. and Thompson, A.W., 1988, Influence of Deformation Substructure on Flow and Fracture of Fully Pearlitic Steel, Acta MetalL, 36, 311-320. Donnay, B., Herman, J.C, Leroy, V., Lotter, U., Grossterlinden, R. and Pircher, H., 1996, Microstructure Evolution of C-Mn Steels in the Hot Deformation Process: The STRIPCAM Model, Proc. 2"** Conf. Modelling of Metal Rolling Processes, (eds), Beynon, J.H., Ingham, P., Teichert, H. and Waterson, K., London, 23-35. Driving Your Future, Spring/Summer, 1995. Dutta, B. and Sellars, CM., 1987, Effect of Composition and Process Variables on Nb(C,N) Precipitation in Niobium Microalloyed Austenite, Mat. Sci. Techn., 3, 197-206. Dyja, H. and Pilarczyk, J., 1993, Analysis of Symmetric and Asymmetric Rolling of Plates in Reversing Mills, Proc. Modelling of Metal Rolling Processes, London, 565-577. Dyja, H., Korczak, P., Markowski, J., Pietrzyk, M. and Nowak, J., 1988, Model profilu blach grubych, przystosowany do systemu sterowania on-line w walcowni blach grubych, Hutnik-Wiadomosci Hutnicze, 65, 91-99 (in Polish). El-Kalay, A. K. E. H. A. and Sparling, L. G. M., 1968, Factors Affecting Friction and Their Effect upon Load, Torque, and Spread in Hot Flat Rolling, J. Iron Steel Inst., 43,152-168 Ekelund, S., 1933, Analysis of Factors Influencing Rolling and Power Consumption in the Test Rolling of Steel, Steel, 93, 27-29. Estrin, Y., 1996, Dislocation Density Related Constitutive Modelling, In: Unified Constitutive Laws of Plastic Deformation, (eds), Krausz, AS. and Krausz, K., Academic Press. Estrin, Y. and Mecking, H., 1984, A Unified Phenomenological Description of Work Hardening and Creep Based on One-Parameter Models, Acta Metall., 32, 57-70. Evans, W. and Avitzur, B., 1968, Measurement of Friction in Drawing, Extrusion and Rolling, ASME, J. Lub. Techn., 90, 72-88. Farkas, K. and Arvai, L., 1995, Investigation of Parameters Influencing the Accuracy of Artificial Neural Networks in Modeling of Stress-Strain Curves, Int. Conf. MicroCAD'95, Miskolc. Fitzpatrick, J.J., 1998, Study of Wear, private communication. Ford, H. and Alexander, J.M., 1964, Simplified Hot Rolling Calculations, J. Inst. Metals, 92, 397-404. Frost, H. J. and Ashby, M.F., 1982, Deformation Mechanism Maps, Pergamon Press, Oxford. Gavrus, A., Massoni, E. and Chenot, J.L., 1996, An Inverse Analysis Using a Finite Element Model for Identification of Rheological Parameters, Proc. Metal Forming'96, (eds), Pietrzyk, M., Kusiak, J., Hartley, P. and Pillinger, I., J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 60, 447-454. Gelin, J.C. and Ghouati, O., 1994, The Inverse Method for Determining Viscoplastic Properties of Aluminium Alloys, (eds). Hartley, P., Pillinger, I., Sturgess, C.E.N., Hall, R., Pietrzyk, M. and Kusiak, J., Proc. Metal Forming'94, Birmingham, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 34,435-440. REFERENCES
334
^
^
Gelin, J.C. and Ghouati, O., 1995, Inverse Identification Methods for Material Parameters Estimation in Large Plastic Deformations, Proc. COMPLAS 4, (eds), Owen, D.R.J., Onate, E. and Hinton, E., Pineridge Press, Barcelona, 767-778. Ginzburg, V.B., 1989, Steel Rolling Technology, Marcel Dekker, Inc. Gittins, A., Everett, J.R. and McG. Tegart, W.J., 1977, Strength of Steels in Hot Strip Mill Rolling, Metals Technology, 4, 377-383. Gladman, T., Dulieu, D. and Mclvor, ID., 1975, Structure-Property Relationships in HighStrength Microalloyed Steels, Microalloying75, Union Carbide Corp., New York, 32-58. Gladman, T., Mclvor, ID. and Pickering, F.B., 1972, Some Aspects of the Structure-Property Relationships in High Carbon Ferrite-Pearlite Steels, J. Iron Steel Inst., 210,916-930. Glowacki, M., 1990, Thermal-Mechanical Model of Rolling of Shapes in 4-Roll Grooves, Metal. Odlew., 16, 541-562. Glowacki, M., 1997, Application of an Experimentally Updated Generalized Plane Strain FEM Model to Rolling of Bimetals, Metall. Foundry Eng., 23, 493-503. Glowacki, M. and Pietrzyk, M., 1989, Experimental Substantiation of Rigid-Plastic FiniteElement Modelling of Three-Dimensional Forming Processes, J. Mech. Work. Techn., 19, 295-303. Glowacki, M., Kedzierski, Z., Kusiak, H., Madej, W. and Pietrzyk, M., 1992, Simulation of Metal Flow, Heat Transfer and Structure Evolution during Hot Rolling in Square-Oval-Square Series, Proc. Conf METAL FORMING'92, (eds), Pietrzyk, M. and Kusiak J., Krakow, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 34, 509-516. Glowacki, M., Kuziak, R., Malinowski, Z. and Pietrzyk, M., 1995, Modelling of Heat Transfer, Plastic Flow and Microstructural Evolution during Shape Rolling, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 53,159-166. Glowacki, M., Kuziak R. and Pietrzyk, M., 1996, Modelling of Plastic Flow, Heat Transfer and Microstructural Evolution during Rolling of Vanadium Steel Rods, in: Thermomechanical Processing in Theory, Modelling and Practice, (eds), Hutchinson, B., Andersson, M., Engberg, G., Karlsson, B. and Siwecki, T., Stockholm, 258-265. Greday, T. and Lambergist, M., 1976, The Combined Effect of Microalloying Steels with Columbium and Vanadium, Microalloying'75, Union Carbide Corp., New York, 172-187. Grosman, F., 1996, Problemy doboru fiinkcji naprezenia uplastyczniajacego do programow komputerowej symulacji procesow przerobki plastycznej, Proc. Conf PLAST'96, (eds), Hadasik E. and Ploch A., Ustron, 11-16 (in Polish). Grosman, F., 1997, Problems of Selection of a Flow Stress Functions for Computer Simulation of Manufacturing, Proc. CCME'97, (eds), Ciesielski, R., Ciszewski, B., Gronostajski, J.Z., Hawrylak, H., Kmita, J. andKobielak S., Wroclaw, 1,67-76. Grossterlinden, R., Kawalla, R., Lotter, U. and Pircher, H., 1994, FEM Calculations and Simulation of Evolution of Microstructure during the Hot Rolling of Flat Products - Part I and II, Metall. Foundry Eng., 20, 319-341.
MA THEMA JICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
335
Guang-Ying, L. and Huml, P., 1993, Measurement and Estimation of Coefficient of Friction in Cold Rolling, Proc. Modelling of Metal Rolling Processes, London, 588-602. Guminski , R.D. and Willis, J., 1959-60, Development of Cold Rolling Lubricants for Aluminum Alloys, Journal of the Institute of Metals, 88, 481-492. Gunasekera, J.S. and Mahadeva, S., 1988, An Alternative Method to Predict the Effects of Friction in Metal Forming, Friction and Material Characterization, ASME, MD-Vol. 10, 55-62. Hamauzu, S., Yamada, K. and Kawanami, T., 1987, Rigid-Plastic Finite-Element Analysis of Asymetric Rolling, Proc. COMPLAS'87, (eds), Owen, D.R.J., Hinton, E. and Onate, E., Pineridge Press, Barcelona, 1087-1096. Harding,R.A., 1976, Temperature and Structural Changes in Hot Rolling, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Sheffield, Sheffield. Harmon, P. and Hall, C, 1993, Intelligent Software Systems Development: An IS Manager's Guide, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Harmon, P. and King, D., 1985, Expert Systems: Artificial Intelligence in Business, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Hatamura, Y, and Yoneyama, T., 1988, Measurement of Actual Stress and Temperature on a Roll Surface during Rolling, JSME International, 31, 465-469. Hatta, N., Kokado, J., Kikuchi, S. and Takuda, H., 1985, Modelling on Flow Stress of Plain Carbon Steel at Elevated Temperature, steel research, 56, 575-582. Hatvany, J. and Lettner, F., 1983, The Efficient Use of Deficient Knowledge, Annals of the CIRP, 32/1,423-425. Heinrich, J.C, Huyacom, A.R., Mitchell, A.R. and Zienkiewicz, O.C, 1977, An Upwind Finite Element Scheme for Two-Dimensional Convective Transport Equation, Int. J. Num. MethsEng, 11,131-143. Heinrich, J.C. and Zienkiewicz, O.C, 1977, Quadratic Finite Element Schemes for TwoDimensional Convective Transport Problems, Int. J. Num. Meths Eng., 11, 1831-1844. Hishikawa, S., Maeda, H., Nagakura, H., Hattori, S., Nakajima, M. and Katayama, Y., 1990, New Control Techniques for Cold Rolling Mills - Applications to Aluminum Rolling, Hitachi Review, 39, 221-230. Hady, CO., 1995, Heat Transfer in the Hot Rolling of Metals, Metallurgical and Material Trans., 26B, 1019-1027. Hodgson, P.D. and Collinson, D.C, 1990, The Calculation of Hot Strength in Plate and Strip Rolling of Niobium Microalloyed Steels, Proc. Symp. Mathematical Modelling of Hot Rolling of Steel, (ed.), Yue, S., Hamilton, 239-250. Hodgson, P.D. and Gibbs, R.K., 1992, A Mathematical Model to Predict the Mechanical Properties of Hot Rolled C-Mn and Microalloyed Steels, ISIJ Int. 32,1329-1338. Hodgson, P.D., 1993a, Mathematical Modelling of Recrystallization Processes during the Hot Rolling of Steel, PhD dissertation. University of Queensland. P.D.
REFERENCES
336
Hodgson, P.D., 1993b, Models of Recrystallization Behaviour of C-Mn and Nb Microalloyed Steels, Mat. Forum, 17, 403-410. HofF, N.J., 1954, Approximate Analysis of Structures in the Presence of Moderately Large Steps Deformation, Quart., Appl. Mech., 2, 49. Hoffman, O. and Sach, G., 1953, Introduction to the Theory of Plasticity for Engineers, McGraw-Hill. Inc., New York. Hughes, T.J.R. and Brooks, A.N., 1982, A Theoretical Framework for Petrov-Galerkin Methods with Discontinuous Weighting Functions: Applications to the Streamline Upwind Procedure, In Finite Elements in Fluids, (eds), Gallagher, R.H., Norrie, D.M., Oden, J.T. and Zienkiewicz, O.C, IV, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., London, 46-65 Hughes, T.R.J., 1987, Recent Progress in the Development and Understanding of SUPG Methods with Special Reference to the Compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations, In: Finite Elements in Fluids, vol. VII, (eds), Gallagher, R.H., Glowinski, R., Gresho, P.M., Oden, J.T. and Zienkiewicz, O.C, John Wiley and Sons, London. Huisman, H.J. and Huetink, J., 1985, A Combined Eulerian-Lagrangian Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Analysis of Edge Rolling, J. Mech. Work. Techn., 11, 333-353. Hum, B., Colquhoun, H.W. and Lenard, J.G., 1996, Measurements of Friction During Hot Rolling of Aluminum Alloys, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 60, 331-338. Hutchings, I.M., 1992, Tribology: Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials, CRC Press, Boca Raton. Hv^, Y.J., Hsu, C.T. and Wang, F., 1993, Measurement of Friction and the Flow Stress of Steels at Room and Elevated Temperatures by Ring Compression Tests, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 37,319-335. Hwu, Y.J., Pang, GK.H. and Lenard J.G., 1994, An Application of Artificial Neural Networks to the Prediction of Flow Stress of Steel at Elevated Temperatures, Trans, of North American Manufacturing Research Institute/Society of Mechanical Engineering, XXII, 34-40. Hwu, Y.J., 1995, An Experimental Study of Hot Rolling with Low Finishing Temperature of an Extra-Low Carbon Steel, PhD. Dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo. Iivarinen,J., Kohonen,T., Kangas,J. and Kaski, S., 1994, Visualizing the Clusters on the Self Organizing Map, in Conf on Artificial Intelligence Research in Finland, 122-126, Turku, Finland. Irvine, J. and Baker, T.N., 1984, The Influence of Rolling Variables on the Strengthening Mechanisms Operating in Niobium Steels, Mat. Sci. Eng., 64, 123-134. Irvine, K.J., Pickering, F.B. and Gladman, T., 1967, Grain-Refmed C-Mn Steels, JISI, 2, 1967, 161-182. Jackson, J.E., Jr. and Ramesh, M.S., 1992, The Rigid-Plastic Finite-Element Method for Simulation of Deformation Processing, In.: Numerical Modelling of Material Deformation Processes, (eds). Hartley, P., Pillinger, I. and Sturges, C.E.N., Springer-Verlag, London, Berlin, 148-178. Jarl, M., 1988, Friction and Forward Slip in Hot Rolling, Scand. J. Metall., 17, 2-7. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
337 JeswietJ., 1991, A Friction Sensor for Sheet Metal Rolling, Annals of the CIRP, 40, 231-234. Johnson, C, Navert, U. and Pitkaranta, J., 1984, Finite-Element Methods for Linear Hyperbolic Equations, Comput. Meths Appl. Mech. Eng., 45, 285-312. Kaftanoglu, B., 1989, Computer-Aided Analysis and Modelling of Plastic Behaviour of Steels at Elevated Temperatures, Modelling Hot Deformation of Steels, (ed.), J.G.Lenard, SpringerVerlag, 71-100. Kappen, B. and Gielen, S., 1995, Proc. of Third Annual SNN Symposium on Neural Networks, Nijmegen, Netherlands. 280-286. Karagiozis, A.N., 1986, Experimental Determination of the Strip Temperature Distribution, MASC. Thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton. Karagiozis, A.N. and Lenard, J.G., 1985, The Effect of Material Properties on the Coefficient of Friction in Cold Rolling, Proc. Eurotrib'95, Lyon, 1-7. Karagiozis,A.N. and Lenard,J.G., 1988, Temperature Distribution in a Slab During Hot Rolling, ASME, J. Eng. Mat. Techn., 110, 17-21. von Karman, T., 1925, On the Theory of Rolling, Z. Angev. Math.Mech., 5, 139-141. Karhausen, K. and Kopp, R., 1992, Model for Integrated Process Microstructure Simulation in Hot Forming, steel research, 63, 247-256. Kastner, P., Madej, W. and Pietrzyk M., 1979, Die Kraftparameter des Verfahrens zum Walzen von Quadratknuppeln in Oval- und Rautenkalibern, Arch.Eisenhuttenwes., 50, 335340 (in German). Kedzierski, Z., Kawalla, R., Packo, M., Skolyszewski, A, Kusiak, H. and Pietrzyk, M., 1995, Evolution of the Microstructure in the Processes of Hot Compression and Drawing-Rolling, Book of Abstracts, 7th Int. Conf Mechanical Behaviour of Materials, (ed.), Bakker, A., Hague, 501-502 Kedzierski Z., Kawalla R., Packo M., Skolyszewski A, Kusiak H. and Pietrzyk M., 1996, Evolution of the Microstructure in the Processes of Hot Compression and Drawing-Rolling, ISIJ Int., 36, 1199-1207. Keife, H. and Stahlberg, U., 1980, Influence of Pressure on the Closure of Voids during Plastic Deformation, J. Mech. Work. Techn., 4,133-145. Kejian, H. and Baker, T.N., 1993, The Effects of Small Titanium Additions on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of Controlled Rolled Niobium-Bearing HSLA Plates, Mat. Sci. Eng., A169, 53-65. Khoddam, S., Lam, Y.C. and Thomson, P.F., 1996, Numerical Results Achieved with an Inverse Computational Method for Determining the Constitutive Parameters using the Hot Torsion Test Resuhs, steel research, 67, 39-43. Kihara, J., 1990, Tribological Problems Relating with Physical and Chemical Interaction among the Tool, the Workpiece and the Lubricant, Advanced Technology of Plasticity, 4, 1693-1702. Kikuchi, F, 1977, Discrete Maximum Principle and Artificial Viscosity in Finite Element Approximations of Convective Diffusion equations, ISAS Report No. 550, 42, No. 5, Tokyo. REFERENCES
338 Kim, Y.J. and Young, D.Y., 1985, A Formulation for Rigid-Plastic Finite-Element Method Considering Work Hardening Effects, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 27, 487-495. Klafs, U., 1969, A Contribution to the Determination of the Temperature Distribution in the Tool and Workpiece in Warm Forging, Doctoral Dissertation, Technical University of Hanover, (in German). Kleiber, M. and Kowalczyk, P., 1995, Constitutive Parameter Sensitivity of Inelastic Response, Proc. COMPLAS 4, (eds), Owen, D.R.J., Onate, E. and Hinton, E., Pineridge Press, Barcelona, 25-43. Kliber, J., 1994, New Approaches in Describing Full Stress-Strain Curves, Proc. Conf. Formability'94, (ed.), Bartecek, J., Ostrava, 77-83. Kobasa, D. and Schultz, R.A., 1968, Experimental Determination of the Length of the Arc of Contact in Cold Rolling, Iron Steel Eng., 1-6. Kobayashi, S.,1979, The Mechanics of Plastic Deformation in Metal Forming, in Proc. US Nat. Congress on Applied Mechanics, West Period, North Hollywood, 115-146. Kobayashi, S., Oh, S.I. and Altan, T., 1989, Metal Forming and the Finite Element Method, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford. Kocks, U.F., 1976, ASME, Laws for Work-Hardening and Low-Temperature Creep, ASME, J. Eng. Ind., 98, 76-85. Kohonen,T., 1995, Self-Organizing Maps, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Kohonen, T., Oja, E., Simula, O., Visa, A. and Kangas, J., 1996, Engineering Applications of the Self Organising Maps, Proc. IEEE, 84, 1358-1384. Komori, K., 1997, Simulation of Deformation and Temperature in Multipass Tree-Roll Rolling, Proc. AMPr97, (ed.), Andritschky, M., Minho, 873-880. Kondo, S;, 1975, An Improvement of Rolling Stability during Cold Rolling of Aluminum, ASME, J. Lub. Techn., 97, 37-43. Kopp, R., Cho, M.-L. and de Souza, M.M., 1988, Multi-Level Simulation of Metal Forming Processes, steel research, 59, 161-164. Korhonen, AS., Rantanen, A. and Larkiola, J., 1991, Microstructural Evolution during Hot Rolling, Annals of the CIRP, 40, 263-265. Kudo, H., 1960, Some Analytical and Experimental Studies of Axi-symmetric Cold Forging and Extrusion, Part I, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2, 102-127. Kusiak, J. and Thompson, E.G., 1989, Optimization Techniques for Extrusion Die Shape Design, Proc. NUMIFORM'89, (eds), Thompson, E.G., Wood, R.D., Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Samuelsson, A., Fort Collins, 569-574. Kusiak, J., Pietrzyk, M. and Lenard, J.G., 1995, Application of FE Simulation of the Compression Test to the Evaluation of Constitutive Equations for Steels at Elavated Temperatures, Proc. NUMIFORM'95, (eds), Shen, S.F. and Dawson, P.R., Ithaca, 277-282. Kusiak, J., Kawalla, R., Pietrzyk, M. and Pircher, H., 1996, Inverse Analysis Applied to the Evaluation of Material parameters in the History Dependent Flow Stress Equation in Hot MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
339 Forming of Metals, Proc. Metal Forming'96, eds, Pietrzyk, M., Kusiak, J., Hartley, P. and Pillinger, I, Krakow, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 60, 455-461. Kuziak, R., 1997, Matematyczne modelowanie zmian mikrostrukturalnych podczas nagrzewania, przerobki cieplno-plastycznej i chlodzenia stall perlitycznych, Prace IMZ, 49, 354 (in Polish). Kuziak, R., Glowacki, M. and Pietrzyk M., 1996, Modelling of Plastic Flow, Heat Transfer and Microstructure Evolution during Rolling of Eutectoid Steel Rods, Proc. Metal Forming'96, (eds), Pietrzyk, M., Kusiak, J., Hartley, P. and Pillinger, I., Krakow, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 60, 589-596. Kuziak, R., Cheng, Y.-W., Glowacki, M. and Pietrzyk, M., 1997, Modelling of the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels during Thermomechanical Processing, NIST Technical Note 1393, Boulder. Kwon, O., 1992, A Technology for the Prediction and Control of Microstructural Changes and Mechanical Properties in Steel, ISIJ Int., 32, 350-358. Laasraoui, A., and Jonas, J.J., 1991a, Prediction of Temperature Distribution, Flow Stress and Microstructure during the Multipass Hot Rolling of Steel Plate and Strip, ISIJ Int., 31, 95-105. Laasraoui, A., and Jonas, J.J., 1991b, Recrystallization of Austenite after Deformation at High Temperature and Strain Rates - Analysis and Modelling, Metall. Trans. A, 22A, 151-160. Laasraoui, A., and Jonas, J.J., 1991c, Prediction of Steel Flow Stresses at High Tempreatures and Strain Rates, Metall. Trans, 22A, 1545-1558. Lang, G., 1984, The Dependence of Several Extrusion Parameters on the Extrusion Temperature in the Direct Extrusion of Al 99.6, Aluminium, 60, 813-819. Larkiola, J., Myllykoski, P., Nylander, J. and Korhonen, A.S., 1995, Prediction of the Friction Coefficient in Cold Rolling by Neural Computing, 124th TMS Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, 209-220. Larkiola, J., Myllykoski, P., Nylander, J. and Korhonen, A.S., 1996, Prediction of Rolling Force in Cold Rolling by Using Physical Models and Neural Computing, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 60, 381-386. Larkiola, J. and Korhonen, A.S., 1997, Application of Neural Networks in Rolling of Steel in Proc. of the IPMM'97, Australasia - Pacific Forum on Intelligent Processing and Manufacturing of Materials, (eds), Chandra, T., Leclair, S.R., Meech, J.A., Verma, B., Smith, M. and Balachandran, B., Gold Coast, 324-330. Le Bon, A.B. and Saint-Martin de, L.N., 1976, Using Laboratory Simulation to Improve Rolling Schedules, Microalloying75, Union Carbide Corp., New York, 90-99. Lee, C.H. and Kobayashi, S., 1970, Elastoplastic Analysis of Plane Strain and Axisymmetric Flat Punch Indentation by the Finite Element Method, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 12, 349-370. Lee, C.H. and Kobayashi, S., 1973, New Solution to Rigid Plastic Deformation Problems, ASME, J. Eng. Ind., 95, 865-873.
REFERENCES
340
Lehnert, W. and Cuong N.D., 1994, Computer Aided Modelling of Steel Microstructure during Rolling in Continuous Mills, Proc. Conf. Formability'94, (ed.), Bartecek, J., Ostrava, 256-263. Lenard, J.G., 1990, An Experimental Study of Boundary Conditions in Hot and Cold Flat Rolling, Annals of the CIRP, 39, 279-282. Lenard, J.G., 1991, Measurements of Friction in Cold Flat Rolling, J. Mater. Shaping Technol, 9, 171-180. Lenard, J.G., 1992, Friction and Forward Slip in Cold Strip Rolling, Trib.Trans., 35, 423-428. Lenard, J.G., Wang, F. and Nadkarni, G., 1987, The Role of Constitutive Formulation in the Analysis of Hot Rolling, ASME, J. Eng. Mat. Techn., 109, 343-349. Lenard, J.G. and Davies, M. E., 1995, The Distribution of Temperatures in a Hot/Cold Die Set: the Effect of the Pressure, Temperature and the Material, ASME, J. Eng. Mat. and Techn., 117,220-227. Lenard, J.G. and Pietrzyk, M., 1990, Thermal-Mechanical Modelling of a Hot Strip Mill, Advanced Technology of Plasticity, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf Technology of Plasticity, Kyoto, vol.2, 601-606. Lenard J.G. and Z. Malinowski, 1993, Measurements of Friction During Warm Rolling of Aluminum, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 39, 357-371. Lenard, J.G., Pietrzyk, M. and Malinowski, Z., 1994, Mathematical and Physical Modelling of Rolling, In Huber's Yield Criterion in Plasticity, (eds), Pietrzyk, M., Kusiak, J., Sadok, L. and Engel, Z., AGH Krakow. Lenard, J.G. and Zhang, S., 1997, A Study of Friction During Lubricated Cold Rolling of an Aluminum Alloy, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 72, 293-301. Li, G. and Kobayashi, S., 1982, Rigid-Plastic Finite-Element Analysis of Plane Strain Rolling, ASME, J. Eng. Ind., 104, 55-64. Li, Y.H. and Sellars, CM., 1996, Evaluation of Interfacial Heat Transfer and Friction Conditions and Their Effects on Hot Forming Processes, Proc. 37**" MWSP Conf, Hamilton, 385-394. Lim, L.S. and Lenard, J.G., 1984, Study of Friction in Cold Strip Rolling, ASME, J. Eng. Mat. Techn., 106, 139-146. Lin, J.F., Huang, T.K. and Hsu, C.T., 1991, Evaluation of Lubricants in Cold Strip Rolling, Wear, 147,79-91. Loung, L. H. S. and Heijkoop, T., 1981, The Influence of Scale on Friction in Hot Metalworking, Wear, 71, 93-102. Mahrenholtz, O., 1982, Different Finite-Element Approaches to Large Plastic Deformation, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech, Eng., 33, 454-468. Majta, J., Lenard, J.G. and Pietrzyk, M., 1995, A Study of the Effect of the Thermomechanical History on the Mechanical Properties of a High Niobium Steel, Mat. Sci. Eng., A206, 249-259. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
341 Majta, J., Munther, P., Lenard, J.G., Kedzierski, Z. and Pietrzyk, M., 1996a, Finite-Element Technique Applied to the Simulation of Thermal, Mechanical and Microstructural Evolution during Rolling of High Nb Steel, Proc. 5* ICTP, Columbus, I, 19-22. Majta, J., Kuziak, R., Pietrzyk, M. and Krzton, H., 1966b, Use of the Computer Simulation to Predict Mechanical Properties of C-Mn Steel, after Thermomechanical Processing, Proc. Metal Forming'96, (eds), Pietrzyk, M., Kusiak, J., Hartley, P. and Pillinger, I., Krakow, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 45, 581-588. Majta, J., Zurek, A. and Pietrzyk M., 1997, The Effect of Deformation in the Two-Phase Region of C-Mn and Microalloyed Steels on the Mechanical Behaviour of the Resulting Structure, J. Phys. IV France, 7, C3, 397-402. Male, A.T., 1962, The Friction of Metals Undergoing Plastic Deformation at Elevated Temperatures, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham. Male, A.T. and Cockroft, M.G., 1964, "A Method for Determination of the Coefficient of Friction of Metals Under Conditions of Bulk Plastic Deformation," Journal of the Institute of Metals, Vol. 93, 38-46. Male, A.T. and DePierre, V., 1970, The Validity of Mathematical Solutions for Determining Frictionfi-omthe Ring Compression Test, ASME, J. Lub. Techn., 92, 389-397. Malinowski, Z., 1993, Elastoplastic Finite-Element Solution to the Stress Problem in the Plane-Strain Cold Rolling Process, Metall. Found. Eng., 19, 323-336. Malinowski, Z. and Lenard, J.G., 1993, Experimental Substantiation of an Elastoplastic Finite Element Scheme for Flat Rolling, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Eng., 104, 1-17. Malinowski, Z., Lenard, J.C. and Davies, M.E., 1994, A Study of the Heat Transfer Coefficient as a Function of Temperature and Pressure, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 41, 125-142. Malinowski, Z., Kusiak, J. and Pietrzyk, M., 1995, Application of the Inverse Techniques to the Experimental Tests, Proc. Conf. Application of Mathematical Methods in Science and Technique, Krakow, vol.2, 43-52. Malvern, L.E., 1969, Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium, Prentice Hall, Englewood Hills. Marcal, P.V. and King, I.P., 1967, Elastic Plastic Analysis of Two Dimensional Stress Systems by the Finite Element Method, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 9,143-151. Marquardt, D.W., 1963, An Algorithm for Least Squares Estimation of Non-Linear Parameters, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 11, 431-440. Matsui, K., Matsushita, T.,Takatsuka K. and Yamaguchi, Y., 1984, Evaluation of Lubricants for Rolling of Aluminum Sheet and Foil, Advanced Technology of Plasticity, 1, 247-252. Matsuno, F., 1980, Blistering and Hydraulic Removal of Scale Films of Rimmed Steel at High Temperature, Trans. ISIJ, 20,413-421. McKay, J.C, 1987, private communication. McQueen, H.J., 1993, Controversies in the Theory of Dynamic Recrystallization, Mat. Sci. Forum, 113-115,429-434.
REFERENCES
342
Mecking, H. and Kocks, U.F., 1981, Kinetics of Flow and Strain-Hardening, Acta MetalL, 29, 1865-1875. Meech, J. A., 1995, AI Applications in the Mining Industry into the 21st Century, Proceedings of the APCOM XXV, Brisbane. Michell, J.H., 1900, Some Elementary Distribution of Stress in Three Dimension, Proc. London Math. Soc, 32, 23-35. Mori, K., Osakada, K. and Odat, T., 1982, Simulation of Plane Strain Rolling by the RigidPlastic Finite-Element Method, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 24, 519-527. Mori, K. and Osakada, K., 1988, Finite-Element Simulation of Three-Dimensional Deformation in Shape Rolling, Proc. NUMIFORM'89, (eds), Thompson, E.G., Wood, R.D., Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Samuelsson, A, Fort Collins, 337-342. Morrison, W.B., Cochrane, R.C. and Mitchell, P.S., 1993, The Influence of Precipitation Mode and Dislocation Substructure on the Properties of Vanadium-Treated Steels, ISIJ Int., 33, 1095-1107. Mortier, R.M., and Orszulik, ST., 1992, Chemistry and Technology of Lubricants, Blackie and Sons, Glasgow. Mrowec, S. and Przybylski, K., 1977, Oxid Metals, 11, 383. Munther, P. and Lenard, J.G., 1995, Tribology during Hot, Flat Rolling of Steels, Annals of the CIRP, 44, 213-216. Munther, P., 1997, The Effect of Material and Process Parameters on the Frictional Conditions in Hot Flat Rolling of Steels, PhD Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo. Murata,K., Morise,H., Mitsutsuka,M., Naito,H., Komatsu,T. and Shida,S., 1984, Heat Transfer Between Metals in Contact and its Application to Protection of Rolls, Trans. ISIJ, 24:B-309 Nagamatsu, A, Murota, T. and Jimma, T., 1970, On the Non-Uniform Deformation of Block in Plane-Strain Compression Caused by Friction~n, JSME Bulletin, 13,1396-1405. Nakano, T., Hiratsuka, K. and Sasada, T., 1990, Fractal Analysis of Worn Surface and Wear Particles, Trans. Japan Soc. of Tribologists, 35,151-154. Nanba, S., Kitamura, M., Shimada, M., Katsumata, M., Inoue, T., Imamura, H., Maeanda, Y. and Hattori, S., 1992, Prediction of Microstructure Distribution in the Through-Thickness Direction during and after Hot Rolling in Carbon Steels, ISIJ Int., 377-386. Nautiyal, P.C. and Schey, J. A., 1990, "Transfer of Aluminum to Steel in Sliding Contact: Effects of Lubricant, ASME, J. Trib., 112, 282-287. Nedler, J.A., Mead, R., 1965, A Simplex Method for Function Minimization, Comp. Jour., 7, 308-313. von Neumann, J. and Richtmyer, R.D., 1950, A Method for the Numerical Calculation of Hydrodynamical Shocks, J. Appl Phys., 21, 232-337. Norton, F.H., 1929, Creep of Steel at High Temperature, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
^
34^
Okon, R., Glowacki, M., Pietrzyk, M. and Nowakowski, A., 1987, Parametry energosilowe walcowania ceownikow w walcarkach nawrotnych, Hutnik, 54, 31-36 (in Polish). Orowan, E., 1943, The Calculation of Roll Pressure in Hot and Cold Flat Rolling, Proc. I. Mech.E., 150, 140-167. Park, B.H, Hwang, S.W. and Kim, J.G., 1993, Finite-Element Modelling of Front End Bending due to Roll Speed Difference in Plate Rolling, Proc. Modelling of Metal Rolling Processes, London, 553-564. Pawelski, O., 1964, Ein Neues Gerat zum Messen des Reibungsbeiwertes bei Plastischen Formanderungen, Stahl und Eisen, 84, part 2, 1233-1243 (in German). Pawelski, O,, Rasp, W., and Hoerster, C, 1989, "The Ring Compression Test as Simulation Test for the Investigation of Friction in Hot Metal Forming," steel research, 60, 395-402. Pickering, F.B., 1992, Structure-Property Relationships in Steels, in: Materials Science and Technology, vol. 7, (ed.), Pickering, F.B., VCH Publishers Inc., New York, 40-94. Pietrzyk, M., 1982, Analiza metodl elementow skolczonych procesu walcowania blach i tasm, Hutnik, 49, 213-217 (in Pohsh). Pietrzyk, M., 1986, Rigid-Plastic Finite-Element Simulation of Plane-Strain Rolling with Significantly Non-Uniform Flow of Metal, Proc. NUMIFORM'86, (eds), Mattiasson, K., Samuelsson, A., Zienkiewicz, O.C, Gothenburg, 243-248. Pietrzyk, M., 1990, Finite Element Based Model of Structure Development in the Hot Rolling Process, steel research, 61, 603-607. Pietrzyk, M., 1994, Numerical Aspects of the Simulation of Hot Metal Forming Using Internal Variable Method, Metall. Foundry Eng., 20,429-439. Pietrzyk, M., 1996, Application of the Flow Stress and Microstructure Evolution Models Based on the Internal Variable Method to the Simulation of Hot Forming of Steel, Proc. NUPHYMAr96, Sophia AntipoUs, 193-198. Pietrzyk, M., 1998, Simulation of Metal Flow and Heat Transfer during Rolling after Continuous Casting, Proc. 1^ ESAFORM Conf on Material Forming, (eds), Chenot, J.L., Agassant, J.F., Montmitonnet, P., Vergnes, B. and Billon, N., Sophia Antipolis, 1998, 21-24. Pietrzyk, M. and Glowacki, M., Metoda obliczania sil i momentow w procesie walcowania ksztaltownikow, Hutnik, 48, 1981, 380-383 (in Polish). Pietrzyk, M. and Lenard, J.G., 1988, Experimental Substantiation of Modelling Heat Transfer in Hot Flat Rolling, Proc. 25^ Nat. Heat Transfer Conf, Houston, (ed.), Jacobs, H.R., HTD96, 3, 47-53. Pietrzyk, M. and Lenard, J.G., 1990, The Effect of the Temperature Rise of the Roll on the Simulation of the Flat Rolling Process, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 22, 177-190. Pietrzyk, M. and Lenard, J.G., 1991, Thermal-Mechanical Modelling of the Flat Rolling, Process, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Pietrzyk, M. and Lenard, J.G., 1991a, Thermal-Mechanical Model for Reverse Hot Rolling of Thick Plates, Proc. 6th Conf on Metal Forming, (eds), Tisza, M. and Kardos, K., Gyor, Ml 1M20. REFERENCES
344
—
Pietrzyk, M and Lenard, J.G., 1993, Modelling the Evolution of Microstructure during Hot Rolling of Steels, Proc. Conf Modelling of Metal Rolling Processes, London, 102-115. Pietrzyk, M., Wilk, K. and Kusiak, H., 1993a, Steady-State FEM Simulation of the Strip Bending in the Asymmetrical Rolling Process, Proc. Conf. Przerobka Plastyczna'93, Krynica, 1-10. Pietrzyk, M., Lenard, J.G. and Dalton, G.M., 1993b, A Study of the Plane Strain Compression Test. Annals of the CIRP, 42, 331-334. Pietrzyk, M., Kedzierski, Z., Kusiak, H., Madej, W. and Lenard, J.G., 1993c, Evolution of the Microstructure in the Hot Rolling Process, steel research, 64, 549-556. Pietrzyk, M., Kusiak, H., Lenard, J.G. and Malinowski, Z., 1994, Heat Exchange between the Workpiece and the Tool in Metal Forming Processes, Conf FORMABILITY'94, (ed.), Bartecek, J., Ostrava, 329-338. Pietrzyk, M. and Tibbals J.E., 1995, Application of the Finite Element Technique to the Interpretation of the Plane Strain Compression Test for Aluminum, Proc. COMPLAS 4, (eds), Owen, D.R.J., Onate, E. and Hinton, E., Pineridge Press, Barcelona, 889-900. Pietrzyk, M., Roucoules, C. and Hodgson, P.D., 1995a, Modelling the Thermomechanical and Microstructural Evolution during Rolling of a Nb HSLA Steel, ISIJ Int., 35, 531-541. Pietrzyk, M., Roucoules, C. and Hodgson, P.D., 1995b, Dislocation Model for Work Hardening and Recrystallization Applied to the Finite-Element Simulation of Hot Forming, Conf NUMIFORM'95, (eds), Shen, S.-F. and Dawson, P.R, Ithaca, 315-320. Pietrzyk, M., Kawalla, R. and Pircher, H., 1995c, Simulation of the Behaviour of Voids in Steel Plates during Hot Rolling, steel research, 66, 526-529. Pietrzyk, M. and Kuziak, R., 1995, Application of the Internal Variable Approach to the Simulation of Microstructural Phenomena in Hot Forming of Eutectoid Steel, Proc. Conf EUROMAT'95, Padua, 239-244. Pietrzyk, M., Wilk, K., Pillinger, I. and Hartley, P., 1996a, Validation of Finite-Element Models for Asymmetric Rolling, Proc. 2^ Conf. Modelling of Metal Rolling Processes, (eds), Beynon, J.H., Ingham, P., Teichert, H. and Waterson, K., London, 432-441. Pietrzyk, M., Hartley, P. and Pillinger, I., 1996b, Porownanie komputerowych programow symulujacych wyginanie sie blach grubych przy walcowaniu na goraco, Proc. Conf Zastosowanie Komputerow W Zakladach Przetworstwa Metali, (eds)., Kusiak, J., Majta, J., Piela, A. and Pietrzyk, M., Koninki, 147-154 (in Polish). Pietrzyk, M., Kedzierski, Z., Packo, M., Skolyszewski, A., Kusiak, H. and Zielinska-Lipiec, A., 1997, Modelowanie procesu walcowania blach ze stall z dodatkiem niobu, HutnikWiadomosci Hutnicze, 64, 162-169 (in Polish). Pietrzyk, M., Kusiak, H., Glowacki, M., Kondek, T., Gierulski, B. and Rog, J., 1998, Wykorzystanie komputerowej symulacji do oceny wrazliwosci mikrostruktury i wlasnosci blach na zmiany parametrow technologicznych procesu walcowania na goraco, Proc. Conf KomPlasTech'98, (eds), Pietrzyk, M., Kusiak, J. and Piela, A., Bukowina Tatrzanska, 17-24 (in Polish). MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
345^ Pillinger, L, 1992, The Elastic-Plastic Finite-Element Method, In: Numerical Modelling of Material Deformation Processes, (eds) Hartley, P., Pillinger, I. and Sturges, C.E.N., SpringerVerlag, London, Berlin, 225-250. Pillinger, L, Hartley, P., Sturgess, C.E.N, and Rowe, W., 1988, Finite-Element Modelling of Metal Flow in Three-Dimensional Forming, Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 25, 87-97. Postlethwaite, I., Atack, P.A. and Robinson, IS., 1996, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 60, 393-398. Powell, M.J.D., 1964, An Efficient Method for Finding the Minimum of a Function of Several Variables without Calculating Derivatives, Comp. J., 7, 149-154. Rabinowicz, E., 1965, Friction and Wear of Materials, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Rabinowicz, E., 1995, Friction and Wear of Materials, 2"** ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York. Rao, K.P. and Hawbolt, E.B., 1992, Development of Constitutive Relationships Using Compression Testing of a Medium Carbon Steel, ASME, J. Eng. Mat. Techn., 114, 116. Rao, K.P., Hawbolt, E.B., McQueen, H.J. and Baragar, D.B., 1993, Constitutive Relationships for Hot Deformation of a Carbon Steel: a Comparison Study of Compression Test and Torsion Test, Can. Metall. Quart., 32,165-175. Rastegaev, M.V., 1940, New Method of Homogeneous Compression of Specimens for the Determination of Flow Stress and the Coefficient of Internal Friction, Zavod Lab, 354 (in Russian) Rebelo, N. and Kobayashi, S., 1980, A Coupled Analysis of Viscoplastic Deformation and Heat Transfer - H, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 22, 707-718. Reid, J.v., and Schey, J.A., 1978, Full Fluid Film Lubrication in Aluminum Strip Rolling, ASLE Trans., 21,191-200. Richards, P. and Sheppard, T., 1986, Constitutive Relationship and Structural Characteristics of Two Ferritic Stainless Steels Deformed in Torsion and Rolling, Mat. Sci. and Techn., 2, 841864. Richelsen, A.B., 1994, Numerical Analysis of Asymmetric Rolling. Accounting for Differences in Friction, Proc. Metal Forming'94, (eds). Hartley, P., Pillinger, I., Hall, F.R., Neal-Sturgess, C.E., Pietrzyk, M. and Kusiak, J., Birmingham, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 45, 149154. Richtmyer, R.D. and Morton, K.W., 1967, Difference Methods for Initial Value Problems, Interscience, New York, 1967. Roache, P.J., 1972, On Artificial Viscosity, J. Comp. Phys., 10, 169-184. Roberts, CD., 1997, Mechanical Principles of Rolling, Iron and Steelmaker, 24, 113-114. Roberts, W.L., 1967, Computing the Coefficient of Friction in the Roll Bite from Mill Data, Blast Furnace and Steel Plant, 499-508. Roberts, W.L., 1978, Cold Rolling of Steel, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. Roberts, W.L., 1983, Hot Rolling of Steel, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
REFERENCES
346 Roberts, W.L., Sandberg, A., Siwecki, T. and Welefors, T., 1983, Prediction of Microstructure Development during Recrystallization Hot Rolling of Ti-V Steels, Proc. Conf HSLA Steels, Technology and Applications, Philadelphia, ASM, 67-84. Roberts, W. and Ahlblom, B., 1978, A Nucleation Criterion for Dynamic Recrystallization during Hot Working, Acat Metal, 26, 801-813. van Rooyen, G.T. and Backofen, W.A., 1960, A Study of Interface Friction in Plastic Compression, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1-27. Roucoules, C, 1992, Dynamic and Metadynamic Recrystallization in HSLA Steels, PhD. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal. Roucoules, C, Hodgson, P.D., Yue, S. and Jonas, J.J., 1994, Softening and Microstructural Change Following the Dynamic Recrystallization of Austenite, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 25A., 389-400. Roucoules, C. and Hodgson, P.D., 1995, Post-Dynamic Recrystallization after Multiple Peak Dynamic Recrystallization in C-Mn Steels, Mat. Sci. Techn., 11, 548-556. Rowe, G.W., 1977, Principles of Industrial Metalworking Processes, Edward Arnold, London. Roychoudhury, R. and Lenard, J.G., 1984, A Mathematical Model for Cold Rolling Experimental Substantiation, Proc. 1"* Int. Conf Techn. Plast., Tokyo, 1138-1145. Rumelhart, D.E., Widrow, B. and Lehr, M.A., 1994, Communications of the ACM, 87-92, 37. Sa, C-Y. and Wilson, W.R.D., 1994, Full Film Lubrication of Strip Rolling, ASME, J. Trib., 116,569-576. Sadok, L., Pietrzyk M,. and Packo, M., 1991, Strains in the Tube Sinking Process Evaluated by the Finite Element Method and Experimental Technique, steel research, 62, 256-260. Sakai, T., 1995, Dynamic Recrystallization Microstructures under Hot Working Conditions, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 53, 349-361. Samarasekera, I., Jin, D.Q. and Brimacombe, J.K., 1997, Critical Challenges in the Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Hot-Rolled Steel Strips, Proc. THERMEC'97, (eds), Chandra, T. and Sakai, T., Wollongong, 57-66. Samuel, F.H., Yue, S., Jonas, J.J., Barnes, K.R., 1990, Effect of Dynamic Recrystallization on Microstructural Evolving during Strip Rolling, ISIJ Int., 30, 216-225. Sandstrom, R. and Lagneborg, R., 1975a, A Model for Hot Working Occurring by Recrystallization, Acta Metall., 23, 387-398. Sandstrom, R. and Lagneborg, R., 1975b, A Model for Static Recrystallization after Hot Deformation, Acta Metall., 23,481-488. Sartori, M.A. and Antsaklis, P.J., 1991, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2, 467-471. Sawada, Y., Foley, R.P., Thompson, S.W. and Krauss, G., 1994, Microstructure-Property Relationships in Plane-Carbon and V and V+Nb Microalloyed Medium Carbon Steels, Proc. 35"*^ MWSP Conf, Hamilton, 263-286. Schey, J.A., 1983, Tribology in Metalworking, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio. MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
347^
Schey, J.A., 1987, Introduction to Manufacturing Processes, 2"^^ ed., McGraw-Hill Inc., New York. Schnur, D.S. and Zabaras, N., 1992, An Inverse Method for Determining Elastic Material Properties and Material Interface, Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 33, 2039-2057. Schroeder, W. and Webster, D.A., 1949, "Press-Forging Thin Sections: Effect of Friction, Area and Thickness on Pressures Required," ASME, Journal of Appl. Mech., 16,289-294. Schunke, J.N., Sudarshan, T.S. and Srivatsan, T.S., 1988, Effects of Oxygen in Influencing Friction Characteristics of Metals, Wear, 128,211-221. Schwefel, H.P., 1981, Numerical Optimization of Computers Models, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Sellars, CM., 1979, Physical Metallurgy of Hot Working, in: Hot Working and Forming Processes, (eds), Sellars, CM. and Davies, G.J., The Metals Soc, London, 3-15. Sellars, CM., 1990, Modelling Microstructural Development During Hot Rolling, Mat. Sci. Techn., 6, 1072-1081. Sellars, CM., 1997, An Internal State Variable Approach to Modelling Microstructural Evolution during Thermomechanical Processing, Proc. THERMEC97, (eds), Chandra, T. and Sakai, T., Wollongong, 3-11. Sellars, CM. and McTeggart, G, 1972, Hot Workability, Int. Met. Rev., 17, 1-24. Sellars, CM. and Whiteman, J.A., 1979, Recrystallization and Grain Growth in Hot Rolling, Met. Sci. 13, 187-194. Sellars, CM., Irisarri, AM. and Puchi E.S., 1985, in: Microstructural Control of Aluminum Alloys - Deformation, Recovery and Recrystallization, (eds), Chia, H.E. and McQueen, H.J., The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, 179-1196. Semiatin S.L., Collings, E.W., Wood V.E. and Altan, T. 1987, Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Ind. 109, 949-57. Senuma, T., Yada, H., Matsumura, Y., Haranuzu, S. and Nakjima, K., 1984, Calculation Model of Resistance to Hot Deformation in Consideration of Metallurgical Phenomena in Continuous Hot Deformation Processes, Tetsu-to-Hagane, 1392-1399 (in Japanese) Senuma, T. and Yada, H., 1986, Annealing Process - Recovery, Recrystallization and Grain Growth, Proc. 7* RISO Conf., Riso, 547-600. Shaesby, J. S., Boggs, W. E., and Turkdogan, E. T., 1984 Scale Growth on Steels at 1200°C: Rationale of Rate and Morphology, Met. Sci., 18, 127-136. Shaw, L., Miracle, D. and Abbaschian, R., 1995, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Metal/Oxide and Metal/Silicide Interfaces, Acta Metall. Mater., 43, 4267-4279. Shida, S., 1974, Effect of Carbon Content, Temperature and Strain Rate on Compressive Flow Stress of Carbon Steel, Hitachi Res. Lab. Report, 1-9. Siebel, E., and Lueg, W., 1933, Investigations Into The Distribution Of Pressure At The Surface Of The Material In Contact With The Rolls, Mitt. K.W. Inst. Eisenf, 15, 1-14
REFERENCES
348 Silvonen,A., Malinen,A. and Korhonen,AS., 1987, A Finite Element Study of Plane Strain Hot Rolling, Scand. J. Metal, 16, 103-108. Sims, R.B., 1954, The Calculation of Roll Force and Torque in Hot Rolling Mills, Proc. I Mech. E., 168, 191-200. Simula, O., Alhoniemi, E., Vesanto, J. and Hollmen, J., 1998, Analysis and Modeling of Complex Systems Using the Self-Organizing Map, in Neuro-Fuzzy Tools and Techniques, (ed.), N. Kasabov,Springer-Verlag. Simula, O., Kangas, J., 1995, Process Monitoring and Visualization Using Self-Organizing Maps, Neural Networks for Chemical Engineers, Elsevier. Sinicyn, W.G., 1984, Niesimietrichnaya prokatka listov i lent, Metallurgiya, Moskva. Siwecki, T., 1992, Modelling of Microstructure Evolution during Recrystallization Controlled Rolling, ISU Int., 32, 368-376. Siwecki, T., Zajac, S. and Engberg, G., 1995, Recrystallization Characteristics and Grain Growth Behaviour in Nb-(C-N) Microalloyed Steels, Proc. 37* MWSP Conf, XXXm, Hamilton, 721-734. Sluzalec, A., 1992, Introduction to Nonlinear Thermodynamics, Springer-Verlag, London. Srikant, R. and Agrawal, R., 1996, Mining Sequential Patterns: Generalizations and Performance Improvements, Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Extending Database Technology, Avignon, 3-17. Steel in Our Future, Canadian Steel Trade and Employment Congress, Toronto, 1995. Stevens,P.G., Ivens,K.P. and Harper,P.J., 1971, Increasing Work-Roll Life by Improved Roll Cooling Practice, JISI., 209, 1-11. Stevens,P.G., Ivens,K.P. and Harper,P.J., 1971, Increasing Work-Roll Life by Improved Roll Cooling Practice, J.Iron and Steel Inst., 209:1-11 Suehiro, M., Sato, K., Yada, H., Senuma, T., Shigefuji, H. and Yamashita, Y., 1988, Mathematical Model for Predicting Microstructural Changes and Strength of Low Carbon Steels in Hot Strip Rolling, Proc. THERMEC'88, (ed.), Tamura, I., Tokyo, 791-798. Suh, N.P., 1978, Wear Mechanisms: An Assessment of the State of Knowledge, in Fundamentals of Tribology, (eds), Suh, N.P. and Saka, N., MIT Press, Cambdridge. Szmeher, J., 1980, Metody Komputerowe w Mechanice, PWN, Warszawa (in Polish). Tajima, M. and Lenard, J.G., 1995, Thermo-Mechanical Treatment of a High Nb-High V bearing Microalloyed Steel, ISU International, 35, 1509-1517. Tanaka, M., Ono, S. and Tsuneno, M., 1986, Factors Contributiong to Crushing of Voids during Forging, J. JSTP, 27, 927-934. The Economist, 1998. Thompson, E.G. and Herman, H.M., 1984, Steady-State Analysis of Elastic-Viscoplastic Flow During Rolling, In: Numerical Analysis of Forming Processes, (eds), Pittman, J.F.T., Zienkiewicz, O.C, Wood, R.D. and Alexander, J.M., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 269-283. MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA TION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
349 Too, J.J.M. and Barnes, K.R., 1989, Application of Numerical Method for the Simulation of Hot Rolling of Metals, Proc. NUMIFORM'89, (eds), Thompson, E.G., Wood, R.D., Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Samuelsson, A., Ft. Collins, 367-374. Too, J.J.M., Ide, K., Maheral, P., Pussegoda, N., Sherwood, E.G. and Gomi, T., 1996, An Integrated AI Approach for the Control of Hot Rolling Processes, Proc. of 37th MWSP, Hamilton, 555-561. Touloukian, Y.S. and Buyco, E.H., 1970, Thermomechanical Properties of Matter, vol.4 Specific Heat - Metallic Elements and Alloys, IFI Plenum, New York - Washington. Touloukian, Y.S. Kirby, R.K., Taylor, R.E., and Desai, P.D., 1970, Thermomechanical Properties of Matter, vol. 12 Thermal Expansion - Metallic Elements and Alloys, IFI Plenum, New York - Washington. Touloukian, Y.S., Powell, R.W., Ho, C.Y. and Klemens, P.G., 1970, Thermomechanical Properties of Matter, vol.1 Thermal Conductivity - Metallic Elements and Alloys, IFI Plenum, New York - Washington. Tryba,V. and Goser,K., 1991, Self-Organizing Feature Maps for Process Control in Chemistry, in Artificial Neural Networks, (eds), Kohonen, T. Makisara, K., Simula, O., Kangas, J., Amsterdam, North-Holland. Tsoi, A.H., 1992, Application of Neural Network Methodology to the Modelling of the Yield Strength in a Steel Rolling Plate Mill, Advances in Neural Information Processing, (ed.), M. Kaufman, Houson and Lippman, 4, 698-705. Ultsch,A. and Siemon,H., 1990, Kohonen's Self-Organizing Feature Maps for Exploratory Data Analysis, in Proc. INNC'90, Int. Neural Network Conf, 305-308, Kluwer, Dordrecht. Underwood, L.R., 1950, The Rolling of Metals, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Venugopal, S., Srinivasan, G., Venkadesan, S. and Seetharaman, V., 1989, A Note of the Determination of Friction Factor by Means of the Reduction-Capacity Test, J. Mech. Working Techn., 19, 261-266. Wang, A., Thomson, P.F. and Hodgson, P.D., 1996, A Study of Pore Closure and Welding in Hot Rolling Process, In: Proc. Metal Forming'96, (eds), Pietrzyk, M., Kusiak, J., Hartley, P. and Pillinger, I., Krakow, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 60, 95-102. Wang, A., Thomson, P.F. and Hodgson, P.D., 1997, A Study of Pore Closure and Welding Using Lead as a Model Material, Proc. IPMM'97, (eds), Chandra, T., Leclair, S.R., Meech, J.A., Verma, B., Smith, M. and Balachandran, B., Gold Coast, 1241-1247. Wang, D. 1983, "Methods for Measurement of the Coefficient of Friction in Plastic Deformation," The 3rd Forging Annual Meeting, Xi'an, China, Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineering. Wang, F., 1989, Simulation of Hot Strip Rolling by Compression Testing, PhD. Thesis, The University of New Brunswick, Fredericton. Wang, F. and Lenard, J.G., 1991, The Constitutive Behaviour of a Nb-V HSLA Steel in the Temperature Range of 900 to 975°C, steel research, 62,66-71.
REFERENCES
350 Wang, F. and Lenard, J.G., 1992, An Experimental Study of Interfacial Friction - Hot Ring Compression, ASME, J. Eng. Mat. Techn., 114, 13-18. Wankhede, U. and Samarasekera, I.V., 1997, Thermal Behavior of High Speed Steel Work Rolls in the Finishing Stands of a Hot Strip Mill, Iron and Steelmaker, 24, 55-60. Washizu, K., 1975, Variational Methods in Elasticity and Plasticity, Pergamon, Oxford. White, H., 1989, Neural Networks, AI expert, 4, 48-52. Wierzbinski, S. and Korbel, A., 1993, Some Aspects of Dynamic Restoration Processes in Cu-lONi Alloy, High Temp. Mater. Proc, 12, 105-116. Wiklund, O., 1996, Modelling of the Temper Rolling Process using Finite Elements and Artificial Neural Networks, 2nd Int. Conf on Modeling of Metal Rolling Processes, (eds) Beynon, J,, Ingham, P., Teichert, H. and Waterson, K., Lx)ndon, 400-409. Wilson, W.R.D. and Walowit, J.A., 1971, An Isothermal Hydrodynamic Lubrication Theory for Strip Rolling with Front and Back Tension, Proc. Tribology Convention, I.Mech.E., London, 169-172. World Development Report 1997, World Bank, 1997 Wusatowski, Z., 1969, Fundamentals of Rolling, Pergamon Press, Oxford. Xin, P., Kihara, J. and Aizawa, T., 1990, Three Dimensional Rolling Deformation Analysis with Deformation Mode Method, Proc 3''** ICTP, Kyoto, 631-636. Xu, W.L, Rao, K.P., Watanabe, T. and Hau, M., 1994, Analysis of Ring Compression Using Artificial Neural Network, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 44, 301-308. Yada, H, 1987, Prediction of Microstructural Changes and Mechanical Properties in Hot Strip Rolling, Proc. Symp. Accelerated Cooling of Rolled Steel, (eds). Ruddle, G.E. and Crawley, A.F., Pergamon Press, Winnipeg, 105-119. Yada, H. and Sebum, T., 1986, Resistance to Hot Deformation of Steels, J. Plasticity Inst. Japan, 27, 34-44 (in Japanese) Yamada, M., Yamada, T., Osakada, K. and Okada, T., 1990, FEM Analysis of Tube Rolling, Proc. 3'^ ICTP, Kyoto, 701-706. Yang, G., Osakada, K. and Kurozawa, T., 1993, Fuzzy Inference Model for Flow Stress of Carbon Steel, J. Plasticity Inst. Japan, 34,422-427 (in Japanese). Yoneyama, T. and Hatamura, Y., 1987, The Development of a Die Sensor, JSME International, 30, 670-677. Yoneyama, T. and Hatamura, Y., 1989, Measurement of Actual Stress and Temperature on the Roll Surface During Rolling, JSME International, 32, 113-117. Yue, S., Roucoules, C, Maccagno, T.M. and Jonas, J.J. 1995, Dynamic Recrystallization in Rod Rolling, , Microalloying'95, (eds), Korchynsky, M., DeArdo, Repas, P. and Tither, G., Pittsburgh, 355-364 Zajac, S., Lagneborg, R. and Siwecki, T., 1995, The Role of Nitrogen in Microalloyed Steels, Microalloying'95, (eds), Korchynsky, M., DeArdo, Repas, P. and Tither, G., Pittsburgh, 321338. ^ MA THEMA TICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULA HON OF THE PROPER TIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
3^
Zhang, S. and Lenard, J.G., 1996, Reduction of the Roll Force during Lubricated Cold Rolling of Aluminum Strips, J. Synthetic Lubrication, 12, 303-321. Zhu, D., Biresaw, G., Clark, S.J. and Kasun, T.J., 1993, Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication with OAV Emulsions, ASME, J. Trib., reprint #93-TRIB-4. Zienkiewicz, O.C., 1977, The Finite-Element Method, McGraw Hill. Zienkiewicz, O.C., Onate, E. and Heinrich, J.C, 1981, A general formulation for coupled thermal flow of metals usingfiniteelements. Int. J. Num. Meths Eng., 17,1497-1514. Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Taylor, R.L., 1989, The Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill Inc. Zouhar, G. and Hofgen, H., 1988, Computer Simulation of the Microstructural Evolution during Hot Working, Proc. 8* PTD Conf., Dearborn, 23-40. Zurek, A., Majta, J. and Pietrzyk, M., 1998, Modelling of the Effects of Deformation in the Two Phase Region of C-Mn and Microalloyed Steels, Proc. 37*^ Mechanical Working and Steel Processing Conf, Indianopolis, 577-582. Zyuzin, W.I., Browman M.Ja. and Mielnikov AF., 1964, Soprotiwlenije deformacji stalej pri gorjaczej prokatkie, Metallurgija, Moskwa.
REFERENCES
353
Author Index Ackert, R., 6 Adebanjo, R.O., 79 Alden, T.H., 207 Alexander, J.M., 90, 92, 94, 304, 306, 307, 308,309,318 Al-Salehi, F.A.K., 15 Alden, T.H., 209 Altan, T., 66, 88, 89 Anan, C , 163 Arvai, L., 294, 297 Ashby, M. F., 174 Atack, P.A., 57 Avitzur, B., 16, 63 Azushima, A., 26 Backofen, W.A., 15,267 Bai, D.Q., 160 Baker, T.N., 174, 199 Banerji, A., 15 Baragar, D.L., 63, 78 Barber, JR., 44 Batchelor, A.W., 44-46 Bertrand-Corsini, C. 235 Beynon, J.H., 78, 92,153, 161, 170,227, 229, 268, 304 Birks, N., 42 Bland, D.R., 85, 90, 92 Blazevic, D.T., 43 Booser, E.R., 23, 24, 26, 42, 54 Boratto, F., 160 Bowden, F.P., 12,13 Bresson, P., 293 Brimacombe, J.K., 148 Brooks, A.N., 126 Brown, S., 206, 207 Bryant, G.F., 29 Buchanan, B.G., 282 Buchmayr, B. 168 Bugini, A., 57 Burnet, M.E., 176
Cao, G.R, 136 Carroll, C.W., 258 Chakrabarty, J., 112 Chen, B.K., 28, 30, 32, 105, 108, 109 Chen, C.C, 161 Chenot,J.-L., 105,110 Cho, S., 295 Choquet,P., 153, 155, 156, 157, 160, 165, 177, 180, 271,274 Codina, R., 126, 127, 128,129 Coldren, A.P., 199 Coleman, T., 199 CoUinson, D.C., 183,268,271 Cser,L.,277,294,318 Cuong, N.D., 71 Czichos, H., 44 Dadras, P., 28 Davies, C.H.J., 207,212, 213, 214, 218 DePierre, V., 16, 63 Devadas, C. 78, 153 Devenpeck, M.L., 40 Dobrucki, W., 141 Dollar, M., 172 Donnay, B., 170 Dutta,B., 158, 160, 184, 187, 188, 190, 192, 193, 195, 196 Dyja, H., 136 Ekelund, S., 20, 21, 56 El-Kalay, A.K.E.H.A., 43 Estrin, Y., 206, 207, 108, 210, 211, 215, 219, 220 Evans, W., 15 Farkas, K., 294, 297 Fitzpatrick, J.J., 46 Ford, H., 85, 90, 92, 305 Frost, H.J., 219 Gavrus, A., 251, 258, 259, 260 Gelin, J.C, 257, 58, 259, 260, 261
354 Gibbs,R.K., 13, 156, 157, 164, 165, 167, 170, 172, 175, 176, 177, 184, 188, 229, 271, 274 Ginzburg, V.B., 285, 296 Gladman, T., 169, 171, 172, 202 Glowacki, M., 1, 111, 168, 235, 238, 243, 244 Greday, T., 199 Grosman, F., 70, 71 Grossterlinden, R., 168 Guang-Ying, L., 141 Guminski, R.D., 25 Gunasekera, J.S, 16 Hamauzu, S., 136 Harding, R.A., 29 Harmon, P., 282 Hatamura, Y., 15, 17, 18 Hatta, N , 78, 83 Hatvany, J., 277 Heinrich, J.C, 118, 128 Hishikawa, S.,8 Hlady, CO., 32 Hodgson, P.D., 72, 153, 154, 156, 157, 158, 160, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 170, 172, 175, 176, 177, 182, 184, 187, 188, 189, 190, 192, 193, 195, 196, 218, 223, 229, 238, 268, 271, 274 Hoff,NJ, 110,111 Hoffman, O., 18 Huetink, J., 235 Hughes, T.J.R, 126 Huisman, HJ., 235 Hum,B., 15, 16, 17,57,96, 141 Hwu, Y.J., 7, 79, 298, 300, 305 livarinen, J., 290 Irvine, I , 199 Jackson, J.E., Jr., 106 Jarl, M., 21 Johnson, C , 126 Jonas, J.J., 78, 79, 153, 156, 158, 160, 163, 218, 266, 267, 269, 299, 304
Kaftanoglu, B., 79 Kappen, B., 293 Karagiozis, A.N., 15, 28, 29, 30, 38, 49, 54, 141 Karhausen, K., 168 von Karman, T., 85, 90 Karhausen, K., 168 Kaski, S., 288 Kastner, P., 235 Kedzierski, Z., 177, 178, 180, 193, 195 Keife, H., 148 Kejian,H., 172, 175 Khoddam, S.,251 Kihara, J., 26 Kikuchi, F., 128 Kim,Y.J., 113 King, D., 280 King, LP., 105 Klafs, U., 28 Kleiber, M. 228, 259 Kliber, J., 72 Kobasa, D., 86 Kobayashi, S., 105, 106,109, 111, 130 Kocks, U.F., 161, 170, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210,211,266 Kohonen, T., 288, 289 Komori, K., 236 Kondo, S., 26 Kopp, R., 168 Korhonen, A.S., 168, 277, 291, 318 Kudo, H., 63 Kusiak, J., 30, 73, 212, 213, 251, 259, 260, 266, 267, 268 Kuziak, R, 67, 153, 156, 157, 158, 164, 166, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 175, 176, 202, 204, 215, 216, 238, 239, 241, 244, 266 Kwon, O., 156, 160 Laasraoui, A., 78, 79, 153, 156, 158, 160, 163,218,266,267,299,304 Larkiola, J., 291, 293, 297 Lang, G., 57 LeBon,A.B., 172 Lee,C.H., 105,106, 111 Lehnert, W., 71
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
355 Lenard, J.G., 15, 16,18, 21, 28, 29, 30, 36, 38,40,47,48,49,50,51,53,54, 55, 56, 57, 70, 74, 78, 79, 82, 91, 93,94,95,98,102, 106, 110,112, 114,117,118,120,125,132,134, 136, 141, 223, 227, 228, 237, 268, 294, 304, 305 Li, a , 105 Lim,L.S., 15 Mahrenholtz, O., 105 Majta, J., 164, 172, 173, 174, 175, 192, 196, 194, 200, 202, 203 Male, A.T., 16, 39, 63 Malinowski, Z., 15, 29, 57, 112, 114, 117, 118,119,237,251 Malvem,L.E., 113, 117 Marcal, P.V., 105 Marquardt, D.W., 258, 259, 260 Matsui, K., 26 Matsuno, F., 42 McG. Tegart, W.J., 78, 105, 116 McKay, J.C., 2 McQueen, HJ., 161 Mecking, H., 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 215,219,220,266 Mead, R., 256 Meech, J.A., 283 Michell, J.H., 95 Misaka, Y., 78 Mori, K., 105, 235 Morrison, W.B., 199 Mortier, R.M., 22 Mrowec, S., 42 Munther, P., 55, 56, 102 Murata, K., 29, 249 Nagamatsu, A., 15 Nakano, T., 44 Nanba, S., 256, 158, 167 Nautiyal, P.C, 26 Ndumu, A.N., 293 Nedler, J.A, 256 von Neumann, J., 126 Norton, F.H., 110 Okon, R., 235 Orowan, E., 51, 52, 85, 90, 92-95,101,
174, 246, 250, 252 Osakada, K., 235 Park, B.H., 136 Pawelski, O., 15,40 Pietrzyk, M., 28, 29, 30, 31, 55, 70, 73, 74, 91,105,106,110, 111, 120, 125, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 146, 147, 168, 177, 180 182, 183, 185, 186, 187, 191, 193, 194, 195, 196, 207, 215, 216, 219, 220, 223, 227, 228, 235,251,264,265,273,305 Pillinger, L, 12, 136, 235 Portman, P., 293 Postlethwaite, I., 293 Powell, M.J.D., 256, 262 Rabinowicz, E., 12, 15, 36, 37, 39, 40, 42, 44 Rao, K.P., 77, 268 Rastegaev, M.V., 63 Rebelo, N., 130 Reid, J.v., 16 Richards, P., Richelsen, AB., 136 Richtmyer, R.D., 128 Rice,W.B., 15 Roache, PJ., 128 Roberts, CD., 11 Roberts, W.L., 16,18,20, 21, 43,49, 58, 141, 153, 156, 157, 158, 165, 167, 170, 177, 182, 211, 220, 271, 274 van Rooyen, G.T., Roucoules, C, 83, 157, 162, 163, 164 Roverso, D., 287 Rowe, G.W., 19, 20 Roychoudhury, R, 51, 93-95 Rumelhart, D.E., 292 Sadok,L., I l l Sakai, T., 153,162, 163, 165 Samarasekera, L, 30, 32, 148 Samuel, F.H., 177 Sandstrom, R, 206, 207, 211, 214, 215, 216, 219, 220 Sartori, M. A , 295
AUTHOR INDEX
356 Sawada, Y., 176 Schey, J.A., 1, 12, 15, 16, 26, 40, 88, 102, 103, 141 Schnur, D.S., 259 Schroeder,W., 151 Schunke, J,N., 43 Schwefel, H.P., 255 Sellars, CM., 28, 43, 92, 105, 110, 111, 152, 153, 156, 157, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 170, 177, 178, 180, 182, 184, 187, 188, 190, 192, 193, 196, 206, 207, 222, 227, 229, 271, 273, 274, 275, 304 Semiatin, S.L., 28 Senuma, T., 79, 167 Shaesby, IS., 42 Shaw, L., 43 Shida, S., 55, 74, 132, 248 Siebel,E., 15, 16 Silvonen, A., 29 Sims, R.B., 43, 85, 90, 92, 93, 102, 103, 250 Simula, O., 288, 289, 318 Sims, R.B., 43, 85, 90, 92, 93, 102, 103, 248 Sinicyn, W.G., 136 Siwecki, T., 160 Sluzalec, A., 124, 125 Srikant, R., 287 Stachowiak, G.W., 44 Stevens, P.G., 29 Suehiro,M., 155, 156, 170 Suh, N.P., 46 Szmelter, J., 256
Wang, A, 15, 16, 63, 64, 78, 145, 148, 150,268,304 Wankhede, U., 30, 32 Washizu,K., 112, 117 Wierzbinski, S., 162 Wiklund, O., 293 White, H., 301 Wusatowski, Z., 20, 40, 41, 247 Xin, H., 236 Xu, W.L., 79 Yada, H., 79, 153,155, 156, 158, 163, 164, 165, 167, 177 Yamada, M., 236 Yang, G., 80 Yoneyama,Y., 15,17, 18 Zhang, S., 16, 18, 38, 47, 50, 53, 54 Zienkiewicz, O.C, 105, 110, 111, 118, 120, 121, 124, 127, 128 Zouhar, G., 108, 168 Zurek, A, 202, 203 Zyuzin, W.L, 73, 74
Tabor, 12 Tajima, M., 82 Tanaka, M., 148 Thompson, E.G., 112, 259, 260 Too, J.J.M., 136, 293 Touloukian, Y.S., 130 Tryba, V., 288 Tsoi, A.C., 79 Ultsch, A., 290
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
357
Subject Index Activation energy For deformation, 156,166 For grain boundary mobility, 168 For recovery, 168 For recrystallization, 130, 155, 158, 159, 163, 221,275 For self diffusion, 162, 221, 22, 223 Additivity rule, 153, 186 Arrhenius law, 76, 210-212, 216, 273 Asymmetrical rolling, 9, 136-145 Austenite, 6, 76, 80, 151, 153, 154, 173, 187, 195, 196, 200, 204, 205, 241, 243 Austenite grain size, 76, 70, 85, 154, 156158, 161, 164-169, 179-184, 187, 193-197, 199, 210, 205, 208, 212, 214, 220, 226-227, 230-233, 235, 241, 243, 274-275, 277-278, Average Error, 303, 307, 315 Flow strength, 18, 27, 85, 88 Strain rate, 73, 84, 88, 147, 149, 240 Thickness (strip), 109 Stress, 133, 134, 144, 145, 148, 149, 239 Temperature, 11, 65, 306-309, 320 Avrami equation, (see Johnson-MehlAvrami-Kolmogorov equation) Back tension, 86, 87, 106, 246, 300 Backup roll, 8 Bainite, 151, 171 Bearing block, 16, 247, 313 Biharmonic equation, 52, 94 Bi-metallic rolling, 136 Body-centered cubic, 151 Boltzman constant, 210
Boundary additives, 26 Boundary condition, 9, 11, 27, 28, 29, 52, 58, 59, 61, 87, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 106, 117-121, 124-146, 130-132, 141,253,280,316 Boundary surface, 120 Burgers vector, 173, 211, 221 Cantilever, 15 Carbon content, 55, 73-76, 78, 132,151, 156, 178, 299 Carbon equivalent, 75, 168, 301-302, 319 Carbon steel, 3, 5, 19-20, 26, 28-30, 40-43, 49, 55-56, 58, 73-74, 78-80, 98, 101-102, 169, 246, 299-300 Cast iron, 11 Chemical reactivity, 12 Closed form Solution (formula), 85, 93 Equations, 152-153, 273 Integration, 92, 94 Relationship, 271 Coefficient of heat transfer, 29-30, 35 Cold rolling Mills, 6 Of aluminum Of flat products, 6 Comparison of Calculations and measurements Mathematical models Measurements and predictions Compression platens, 63 Compression test, 15, 16, 39, 40, 61-64, 73, 79-80, 82, 137, 153, 177-178, 196-198, 202, 212, 251-254, 264, 270, 272, 276, 298, 304, 310-311 Constant strain rate, 61, 197, 310 Compressive stress, 134 Computer control, 62, 80,286, 315, 318 Computer memory, 106, 244
358 Computer program, 71, 90, 92 Conductivity, 29, 120, 127, 130, 131, 132 Consistency of model, 47, 102, 193, 250, 279,317 Constitutive parameters, (see rheological parameters) Constitutive relation (equation), 70, 78, 88, 98, 105, 112, 146, 184, 256, 266267, 274 Constraints, 256, 265 Contact spot, 13 Contact surface, 16, 19, 24, 28-30, 33, 38, 46,239,252,316 Contact zone, 14, 15, 19, 22, 25, 28, 30, 38-39,61,99, 134,320 Content of Carbon, 55, 73-76, 78, 132, 151, 156, 178,299 Continuous casting, 3, 7, 145, 148-150, 296 Continuous drawing test, 180, 181, 183 Continuous rolling, 6, 7, 130, 147, 149 Control of temperature, 63-64 Controlled rolling, 151 Conventional microstructure evolution model (equation), 153, 168, 208, 225, 241, 273 Conventional models of dynamic recrystallization, 173 Convergence algorithm, 300, 302, 304, 319 Convergence criterion, 109, 264, 302 Convergence of model, 99, 109, 260 Convergence rate, 260, 302, 313, 319 Cooling rate, 151, 168, 169, 171-172, 175, 177-178, 199, 202, 242, 244, 248, 299 Cost function, (see objective function) Coulomb friction, 63 Crank-Nicholson scheme, 125 Critical strain for dynamic recrystallization, 162, 163, 165 Criterion of plastic flow, 91, 93, 112 Cyclic dynamic recrystallization, 162 Data acquisition system, 33, 279, 317
Deformation heating, 66, 253, 272 Dislocation density, 67, 69, 79, 130, 154, 162, 170, 173, 199,208, 212, 213,215-219,221225 Dislocation strengthening, 169, 170 Draft schedule, 67, 151, 226-229, 230 Elastic energy, 12 Elastic entry (compression) 52, 92-93 Elastic exit (recovery), 52, 92-93 Elastic-plastic formulation, 9, 105, 111119,136 Elastic-viscoplastic formulation, 105, 111119,136 Elastic region (zone) 48, 87, 95, 115 Energy per unit volume, 309, 218 Entry plane, 134 Equation of equilibrium, 48, 52, 90, 92-97 Error norm, 222, 253, 255, 273 Eulerianformulation. 111, 114 Eulerian mesh, 105, 117,118 Euler's formula (equation), 105, 112, 114, 118,121,125-126 Exit surface (plane), 205 Exit (final) thickness, 8, 84, 89, 92, 233234, 250, 299, 300, 309 Exit velocity, 27, 97-98, 230 Explicit method, 125 Extreme pressure additives, 26, 38 Extremum principle, 106 Face-centered-cubic, 151 Fatty acid, 26 Fatty alcohol, 26 Ferrite, 76, 80, 151, 168-170, 172, 173, 176, 187, 198, 200, 204, 205, 207, 241 Ferrite grain size, 87, 169, 170, 171, 174, 176, 198-206, 229-233, 241 Ferrous metal, 66, 89 Fibonacci method, 257 Field of Strain, 137-140, 144,146 Strain rate Stress, 113,117-119, 135, 145-146 Temperature, 27,121, 125,130,
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
359 134, 152,235,244 Velocity, 109, 111, 113,117,118 Finishing train, 32, 42, 56, 62, 85, 135, 229, 233-234 Finite difference method, 128 Finite element mesh, 126, 146, 276 Flow curve, 65, 79-80, 221, 300, 302-307, 314 Flow strength, 9, 18-19, 27, 44, 63-64, 6667, 69-70, 75, 84, 88, 91, 250, 316 Force transducer, 16,247 Forward slip (measurement of), 11, 16-17, 21-22, 43, 47-48, 51-53, 55, 57, 9698, 101-102,313 Four-high mill, 13 Fourier series, 93-95 Four-node quadrilateral element, 107 Fractional softening, 193, 199, 208, 220, 223 Free surface, 146 Friction factor, 15, 40, 43, 57, 63-64, 110, 138, 239 Friction hill, 52, 85, 92, 95, 99,101 Friction losses, 101, 122 Friction Stress (force), 15, 26, 86-87, 106107, 110, 119-120, 171,239 Galerkin method, 123, 125-128 Gauss integration point, 109, 118 Gauss-Newton method, 260-261 Generalized plane strain method, 237-241, 246 Gibbs free energy, 210 Golden section method, 257 Gradient of temperature, 132,134,237 Grain (subgrain) boundary strengthening, 169, 170 Grain coarsening, 162 Grain refinement, 6, 162, 215, 218, 241 Grain size, 8, 66, 68, 70, 85, 134-135, 151, 153-157, 163-173, 176, 178-184, 186-187, 193-195, 198-199, 201204, 208, 212-213, 217-218, 220221, 226-227, 229-233, 235, 241, 243, 273-278, 281-283, 286-288, 296-297,299,317
Grain growth, 152, 154, 166, 167, 168, 186, 193, 205, 217, 220, 242 Gradient methods, 258, 260, 263, 264 Grooves (rolling) Box passes, 251 Diamond, 237, 238, 247, 249, 250, 251 Octagonal, 237 Oval, 237, 238, 250, 251 Round, 237, 250, 251 Square, 237, 247, 249, 250, 251 Ground steel roll, 20 Hall-Petch equation, 169, 170, 172, 174 Hardening, 63, 67-70, 79, 110, 112, 117118,137-138, 144,151,153-154, 161, 169, 173, 175, 207-208, 211214, 216-219, 222, 239, 266, 268269, 272, 285 Hardness, 12, 32, 36 Heat conduction, 12, 119, 239 Longitudinal, 239 Heat flux, 11, 27-28, 30, 34-35, 120, 132, 249 Heat gain, 59, 279 Heat generation Due to plastic work (deformation), 119,122 Heatloss, 30, 59, 119, 134,279 Heat treatment, 5 High temperature flow, 152 Homogeneous compression, 88, 93 Hooke's law, 95, 209 Hot strip mill, 6, 7, 11, 20-21, 32, 46, 56, 85, 130, 186, 229-230, 288, 298, 308,317 HSLA steel, 78, 158, 186, 283, 286, 299 Huber-Mises yield criterion, 91, 106, 112 Hydrodynamic lubrication, 22, 38, 44, 98 Impact transition temperature, 169 Implicit method, 125 Incompressibility constraint, 108 Infrared pyrometer, 241 Initial Conditions, 9, 28, 61, 85, 155, 279, 305,316
SUBJECTINDEX
360 Temperature, 33, 180, 182-185, 254, 307, 309 Instron testing machine, 197 Interfacial pressure (force), 25, 29-30, 3334,318 Interfacial shear stress, 11, 16, 87, 90, 9295, 248-249 Interlamellar spacing, 168, 171, 172, 204, 241 Interrupted (compression) test, 197 Inverse analysis (method, approach), 218, 212, 253-255, 269-272, 275, 276 Jaumann rate of stress, 112, 114 Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorow Equation, 79, 154, 159, 167 Lagrange multiplier, 106, 108, 239 Lagrangianformulation, 111, 114 Length of contact, 17, 27, 44, 84, 86-89, 92,250-251 Levenberg-Marquardt method, 260-262 Levy-Mises flow rule, 105, 106, 110, 239 Liquid phase, 151 Liquidus temperature, 151 Low carbon steel, 3, 19-20, 26, 30, 42-43, 49, 55-56, 58, 79, 98, 101, 169, 246, 268, 300, 306-307 Material parameters, 11-12, 22, 29, 32, 36, 39,89,136, 151,210,220,253254, 38 Material properties, 14, 40, 136, 207, 253, 279, 295, 297 Mean flow strength, 88,250 Mean free path of dislocations, 172, 212, 213,218 Mean yield strength, 185 Mechanical Properties, 12, 102, 151, 168-169, 171-174, 198, 204-205, 230-231, 233, 240-242, 244, 288, 295, 299 Medium carbon steel, 73 Metallurgical properties, 67 Microalloying elements, 6, 73, 75 Microstructure evolution, 134, 151-153,
155, 159, 161-162, 173, 179, 182, 184, 186, 189-190, 194-196,208, 225, 228-229, 231, 241, 243, 272273, 275 Mill frame, 85 MilHoad, 7, 9, 50, 54, 98-99, 247 Mill stretch, 300 Mineral oil, 24, 26 Model One-dimensional, 9, 18, 28, 48, 52, 56, 85, 90, 98, 100, 126-127, 188189,237,246,316 Monte-Carlo method, 258, 267, 271 Multidimensional analysis, 289 Multiple peak deformation, 70, 162, 269 Multistage test, 61, 199, 279 Natural lubricant (oil), 312 Neutral point (plane), 16, 48, 52, 87, 90, 92-93,96-99,101,109-110 Newton-Raphsontechnique, 108-109, 111 Niobium (bearing) steel, 135, 158-159, 173, 175, 190, 193-199, 204, 225, 227-228, 268-271 Nitrogen content, 175,195 Nodal temperatures, 121-124, 130 Nodal velocities, 105, 107-109, 111 Non-ferrous metals, 66, 89 Non-gradient methods, 257, 258, 260, 263, 264, 274 Non-Newtonian fluid, 105 Non-stationary heat transfer, 122, 137 Non-steady state model, 125, 136, 138, 141 Non-symmetric rolling, (see asymmetric rolling) Non-uniform strain distribution, 133, 207 Non-uniform temperature, 136, 145 No-recrystallization temperature, (see Recrystallization stop temperature) Normal pressure, 11, 13, 19, 33, 62-63, 249 Norton-Hoff law, 105, 110, 111 Numerical methods, 126, 230
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
361 Objective cost function, 218, 254-261, 263-265, 267, 268, 272, 274, 275, 279 Oleic acid, 26 Oxide layer, 28, 43 One-dimensional model (problem, analysis), 9, 18, 28, 48, 52, 56, 85, 90, 98, 100, 126-127, 188-189, 237, 246, 316 Oscillatory solution, 216 Peak strain, 162, 270, 272 Peak stress, 65, 68, 72, 78-83, 162-163, 270-271 Pearlite, 151, 168, 169, 171, 172, 204, 241 Peclet number, 127-129 Penalty factor (coefficient method), 106, 111, 119,239 Penalty function, 260, 261, 265 Penetration hardness, 12 Petrov-Galerkin approach, 126 Phase diagram, 152 Phase transformation, 79, 241,306 Physical properties, 7, 12, 66 Pin transducer, 15-17,36, 57, 96 Plane strain, 25, 64, 88, 107, 119, 146, 185, 237-240, 246, 254-256, 266268, 309 Plane strain compression test, 25, 64, 146, 256, 266-267 Plastic flow, 49, 61, 69, 87, 91, 93, 110, 112-113,210,243 Plastic potential, 110-111 Plastic region (zone), 115 Plastic strain, 105, 112, 209-212, 215 Plastic work, 119-120, 122, 130, 243, 249 Poisson's ratio, 91, 98, 112, 117-118, 174 Porosity closure, 145-149 PowelPs method, 258, 264 Prandtl-Reuss law, 112 Precipitates 85, 151, 154, 158-160,170, 173-175, 186, 189, 193-197 Precipitation start temperature, 151 Precipitation strengthening, 169, 173-176 Predictive capability of model (equation), 90, 97, 100, 144, 150, 187, 201, 204, 225, 246, 304-305, 314-315
Projected contact length, 27, 84, 88-89, 92 Pure (commercially) aluminum, 26, 56-57, 96 Pure shear, 91 Radius (of curvature) of deformed roll, 18, 27, 44, 84, 86, 90-93 Rate of cooling, 151, 169, 171-172, 175176, 199, 202, 244, 248, 299 Heat generation, 122, 130 Real area of contact, 36 Recovery, 67, 68, 153, 211-213, 216, 217, 219, 221-224, 268 Static, 68, 153, 154, 164, 212, 222, 241, 242 Dynamic, 68, 69, 79, 80, 153, 161, 211,214,222 Recrystallization, 67, 85, 151-153, 155157, 159-167, 180, 182, 184, 186, 188-195, 198, 201-203, 212, 217, 220, 223, 224, 227, 230, 232, 233, 235, 240, 268, 279 Dynamic, 6, 68-70, 78-80, 83, 153, 161-165, 167, 199. 214, 215, 222, 240, 241, 243, 269, 271-273, 275, 279 Metadynamic, 68, 163, 163-166, 240, 241, 242, 273 Partial (incomplete), 154,159,161, 180, 184, 186 Static, 6, 68, 70, 153, 154, 156, 163-166, 200, 205, 222, 241, 242 Recrystallization between passes, 193 Recrystallization stop (no-recrystallization) temperature, 151,161,186 Recrystallized volume fraction, 154, 166, 195, 216, 218, 219, 242, 243, 273, 274, 275, 277 Refined model, 49 Regression analysis, 20, 35, 66, 78, 81-82 Relative velocity, 14, 19, 21-22, 25, 29, 36, 38-39,54,56,248-249,318 Resistance to deformation, 12, 14, 22, 30, 55, 61,66, 69-70, 73-75, 79-80, 8485, 88-89, 98, 106, 110, 144, 247, 252,312,316-317 Retained (accumulated) strain, 168, 169,
SUBJECTINDEX
362 190, 193, 195, 202, 240, 243 Reverse rolling, 125 Rheological parameters, 253-258, 266 Rigid-plastic approach, 9, 106-110, 113,144,145,147,239 Rigid-plastic material, 111 Ring upsetting (compression), 16, 39-40, 63, 79, 137, 146, 300 Roll angular velocity, 137, 232 Roll bending, 8, 288, 300 Roll deformation (flattening), 13, 48, 95 Roll diameter, 12, 29, 31, 44, 58, 85, 90, 132, 136-144, 225, 306-307 Rolling of Aluminum, 38, 57, 137, 161, 309 Aluminum slab, 14 Aluminum strip, 14, 26, 28, 36, 53, 137-140 Angles, 235 Billets, 3, 7, 125, 241 Channels, 235 Copper, 3 I-beams, 237, 244, 245 Ingots, 125 Low carbon steel, 43, 55 Rails, 237, 240, 244, 245 Rods (bars), 240-244, 246, 248 Slab (rectangular), 125 Steel, 20, 40, 47, 56, 70, 132-134, 141, 144, 148, 225, 240, 296, 318 Vanadium steel, 240 Rollmaterial, 31, 87,91,98 Roll pressure, 11, 16-17, 28-30, 32, 36, 48, 52, 53, 58, 87, 90-93, 95-97, 119, 141, 144 Roll radius, 17, 44, 56, 84, 86, 89-90, 93, 98-100, 132, 144, 148-150,250, 299 Roll temperature, 32, 55, 248, 307 Roll torque, 11, 13, 16-17, 21-22, 47-48, 52-55, 57, 85, 87, 91-93, 95-103, 228-229, 246-247, 249-250, 252, 299,311,313-316,321 Roll velocity (speed), 19, 30,47-48, 55-56, 89, 132, 136, 148, 250, 307, 313-
314 Roll wear, 2, 6, 11, 13, 44, 46-47, 57-58 Roll-workpiece interface, 131, 185 Rolling schedule (see draft schedule) Roll pass design, 237, 246 Roughing mill, 62, 86, 135, 281, 295, 298 Rubbing velocity (speed) 318 Runge-Kutta technique, 118 Scale, 7-8, 12, 20, 29, 32, 40-43, 55, 186, 248-249,291,309,318 Search direction, 257 Sellars-Tegartlaw, 105, 110, 111 Sensitivity, 230, 233, 235, 261, 262, 263 Servohydraulic testing system, 33, 62, 80, 306,312 Shape coefficient, 109, 267 Shape function, 107, 121, 123 Shear band, 162 Shear modulus, 12, 112, 173, 209, 216, 221 Shear strain, 133, 207, 208, 211, 238 Shear strain rate, 133, 207, 238 Simplex method, 259,267 Single peak deformation, 69, 70, 162, 269 Slab method (analysis), 93, 188 Sliding (slip) velocity, 15, 110, 120 Softening, 67, 78-79,151,153-154, 161162, 64-165, 193, 199, 207-208, 216-217, 220-223, 266 Solid phase, 151 Solid solution strengthening, 170 Solute drag effect, 158, 193, 194, 196 Specific heat, 12, 30, 65, 120, 130-131 Spindle, 15,85,99,246, 313 Split Hopkinson bar, 204 Stacking fault energy, 68, 161, 162 Stainless steel, 3, 32-33, 40, 186 Stainless steel envelope, 186 Standard deviation, 288, 298, 303-305, 307,319 Statistical analysis, 290 Steady-state flow, 79,118 Steady-state model (solution), 120, 125126, 136, 138, 141, 216 Steel roll, 2, 6, 11, 20-21, 30, 36, 47, 57,
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS
363 70, 92, 141 Sticking friction, 43, 55, 57, 92, 102, 250 Stiffness matrix, 132, 262 Strain hardening (curve) 63, 79, 208, 239, 266, 268, 269, 272 Strain homogeneity, 66, 180 Strain rate, 6, 9, 30, 61-64, 66, 68-88, 105, 111,130,132-133, 141,144-145, 147, 149, 151-153, 156, 162 164165, 168, 179, 186, 198-199, 204214, 217, 222-225, 238-242, 249, 251, 266-269, 272-274, 279, 300, 301,303,307,312,314,319 Strain rate concentration, 133 Strain rate sensitivity, 110 Strengthening effect, 175 Stress-strain curve (relationship), 6, 9, 64, 67-73, 80-81, 84, 137, 199, 204, 206, 216, 220-224, 267-272, 281, 307 Stress tensor, 105, 112, 114, 118-119, 146, 263 Strip temperature, 21, 54, 314 Stripvelocity, 22, 311 Subgrain boundary misorientation, 174, 208 Subgrain size, 161, 218 Substantiation of model, 15, 168, 240 Surface Energy, 12 Hardness, 36 Roughness, 12, 22, 27-28, 33, 36, 42-43, 47, 137, 140, 280, 306 Temperature, 24, 28, 30, 32, 57, 120, 132, 134, 249 Synthetic ester, 26, 313 Synthetic lubricant, 47, 50 Temperature calculations Temperature difference, 28, 35, 249 Temperature measurement, 30, 65, 66 Temperature variation, 186 Tensile strength, 169, 176, 177, 204, 206, 231,244 Tension test, 61-62, 98, 117, 253 Texture strengthening, 169, 176 Time for 5% recrystallization, 159, 193, 197,
Thermal properties, 14, 32 130-131, 148, 230, 253 Thermocouple, 28-33, 39, 65-66, 179, 186188, 199, 246, 248-249, 306-307, 312 Three-dimensional analysis, 237 Time for 5% precipitation, 159, 192, 193, 195, 197, 226-228 Timeofcontact, 30, 33 Time-temperature profile, 28, 30-31, 135136, 179, 188 Tool pressure. 111 Tool steel, 2, 6, 11, 28, 30-31, 47, 73, 246 Torsion test, 62, 185, 253-255 Total reduction, 155,234 Transfertable, 7, 279 Two-dimensional analysis, 48, 85, 102, 106, 146, 238-239 Uniaxial compression test, 15-16, 29, 117, 204 Uniform deformation, 180, 237, 277 Uniform (non) strain distribution, 133 Uniform (non) temperature distribution, 132, 134, 136 Upsetting, 272, 274-277 Upwinding, 126, 128 Vanadium (bearing steel), 82, 158,175176, 240-242 Variational principle, 120 Velocity dependent friction, 109 Voce equation, 270 Water spray, 7 Wavelength, 298 Weighted residual method, 123 Weighting function, 129 Workhardening, 137-138, 151, 153-154, 161 Workhardening material, 137-138 Yield stress, 169-172, 175, 199-202, 204, 206,231,233,244,266 Young's modulus, 12, 239
SUBJECTINDEX
364 226, 227, 228 Time for 50% recrystallization, 155, 157, 165, 166, 224, 225 Time for 95% recrystallization, 159, 193, 197, 226-228
MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED PRODUCTS