Northern India according to the Shui-ching Chu

NORTHERN INDIA ACCORDING TO THE SHUI"'CHING".CHU

ISTITUTO ITALIANO PER IL MEDIO ED ESTREMO ORIENTE

SERLE ORIENTALE SOTTO

LA

DIREZIONE

DI

GIUSEPPE TUCCI

VOLUME II

ROMA Is. M. E. O. r 9 50

ROMA

SERlE ORIENTALE ROMA

II L. PETECH

NORTHERN INDIA ACCORDING TO THE SHUI/CHING/CHU

ROMA Is. M. E. O. 195 0

TUrTI I DIRInl RISERVATI

Printed

In

Italy - Stampato

In

1tafta

CONTENTS

PREFACE . . . .

vn

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

VIII

INTRODUCTION

1

SECTION A

(tRANSLATION AND COMMENTARY)

SECTION B

(TRANSLATION AND COMMENTA.RY)

II

. ".

57

APPENDIX: Cm'PIN.

63

INDEXES . . . . .

81

[v]

PREFACE I wish to express

my sincere gratitude to Professor Giuseppe

Trmi

for the loatl of books, for discussing with me several dotJbifHI points and for some valuable suggestiotls; to Professor J. ]. L. Dtlyvendak jar help itl two d{fjicult passages,' to Professor Paul Demitville for baving proCHred for me the microJilm reprodtlctions oj sOl1Je Cbinese texts and articles not available itt Rome; and to Professor H. W. Bailey for advice on Celltral AsiaJj data relevant to my subject. L. PETECH

( 'In]

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ASIAH BErEO

= ArchaeologIcal Survey of IndHl Annual Reports. ~'" Bulletin de l' Ecole Fran~a.ise d' Extreme Onent.

BSOS

= Bulletin of the School of Orlenta! Studies.

HJAS

= Harvard Jouwal of Astatic StudIes

J. As.

= IndIan HIStorIcal Quartcily. = JoUlnal Asiauque.

JASB

=

]RAS

IHQ

Jou£nal of tbe

ASIatic Society

of Bengal.

MASI

= Journal of the Royal ASIatic Society = MemOIrs of the ArchaeologICal Survey of Indta.

MDAFA

=

5S

Memoires de 1a D6Mg'ltion Archeologlque FJanqaise en Afghanistan.

SW

= Shlli,chins,ehtl, ediuOll of Shell Ping,hsun } = Shlli,ehmg,ehtl, edition of Tat Chen for partIculars = SIJllj"hillgdhtl, edmon of Wang HsIen'ch'len see p. 2

SY

= Sblfi,cbillg,ebll. editJon of Yang Hsi,tnin

TaJ$bo TP

= T aisho Issaikyo edition of the Chinese BuddhIst Canon. = T'oung Pao.

ZDMC

= Zeitschrift der Deutschen MorgenIandischen GeseUschaft.

ST

[vm]

INTRODUCTION * The travels of the Chinese Buddhist pilgrims to India have always drawn a great deal of attention from Westeln scholars; so have also the accounts of India and its kingdoms found scattered in the twenty. .four dynastic hIstories of China. But, strange to say, there is one Chinese text which has not yet reeeivl ed its due consideration, at least as far as India is concerned.:} This text is the Water Classic and its commentary. The Shui1ching 71<. ~ (Water Classic) is a small text traditiol nally attributed to the Han dynasty, but probably written during the Three Kingdoms period (220/265). It was commented upon by Li Ta0/yuan Y~:iR jC (d. 527). an official of the Southern Chinese Ch'i and Liang dynasties. His work. the Shui1ching"c/JfJ 71< ~ 1± (Commentary on the Water Classic) has much suffered in the long rUn of time. The Classic and the commentary got confounded with each other, and not till the 18th century was the work fillly restored, thanks to the unremitting labour of three Chinese scholars, who worked *) The system of ttal1sctiptiol1 followed is Wade, Giles. Ancient (6th centllry A. D.) pronunciation of Chinese lS given according to KAIU.GnEN, Analytic al(tlomry ~f Chillese alld SinojapflIlese, Paris, 19.i3. QuotatIOns of the Dynastic HlSlori~s refer to the Po,na.-pen "j!'f ~ edition of the Commercial Pres~ (Shanghai, 1936), r) Even a painstakmg and industrious compilatol like CHANG HS.lNGiLANG i}~ k~ ~A has wholly omitted the S/wi,clJing,c/Ju ftom his digest of Chinesll materials 011 Indla (C/)///lg.4lfi-clJiaM'/lffg,siJlh,/iat),Jlllj,p'iCII Ifl 11M ~ ~ JJ! 1t'l-lifIi If, vol. VI, Pekmg, 1;930).

*

[ 1 ]

I -

L. PUIlClf, Northern India aceorame to tlls Shm-4Jl1l9-dllJ:

L, PETECH

independently of each other but arrived at practically the same results. I} For my translation I have used the edition prepared by Tai Chen ~\1Q ,~~ and printed in 1774 in the official collectanea ~Vulyingdieft"cb!;"chenlpaHlts'Ung"shu If-t ~ ~ ~ ~ JiOC ~ . ; photographic reprint in the Ssu"pu.-tlung"k al1 fll, series of 1936. In textual notes it is quoted as ST. I have checked it throughout with the following three editions: C

WI 1m.

The SIJtli1ching1clm huilchiao 7~ f~ 11: III f§t, published at Faaehow in 188 I and reproducing the collation made by Yang Hsilmin fib ~ ~ in I865; its text is that of Tai Chen, but some of the notes are interesting. Quoted by the initials 5Y. The HOlchiao sbuilchinglchu i'i- t~ J~ ~ -a: of Wang Hsieut chcien ;E jt tI (1842/19I8). published in 1892. According to Cheng Te/k'un ~rs fj :r$. this is the best edition exist" lng. 2) It follows the text of Tai Chen. but gives a large number of variants and some interesting notes. Quoted by the initials SW. The Shui1chinglchu chilshih tingle 7j'( ~ B: 1t ~ 1fT 'lift prep
-*

t) See Hu

SHIa,

Note on Gh'Uan Tsu,wang. Chao I. . ch'mg and Tai ell/Here cf the Ch'IHg Perloa. Washmgton. 1943'4,

Chen. tn How.nu., Eminent

Pfc. 970"'982 • .1.) Index to lbe Water Cl(1;sic (HarvarcLYenching Sinological Index Series. vol. XlI). Pelping, 1934.

[2]

INTRODUCnON

I have also consulted the contributions of Chung Fengmien ~ IL &{:; 1) they give, however, no important variants to the section of the text which interests us. The Shui,ching,chu began to attract the attention of Western scholars about half a century ago, and some good work has already been done on ie") It is a nne piece of Chinese seha, larship. Li Tao. . yuan was no traveller, but as a desk geogra.. . pher he ranks high, chiefly because he used very good sources, some of which are now lost. In the words of R. Stein, Li Tao,yuan wrote animated above all by an interest "for the miracu . . lous, religious, folkloristic and sociological facts ~'. Besides his purely hydrographical researches, he busied himself mainly « with locali2ing facts which we would call historical, but which deserve rather the appellation of herOlcal: holy places, rare and extraordinary produce, strange customs, apparitions, legends, in short the mirabilia ".9) In the case of India, Li Tao/yuan, although q Confucianist with some Taoist leanings~ avails himself almost exclusively of the Buddhistic tradition, without paying much attention to the rna.terials elaborated up to his time in the various dYllastic histories. He employs the traditional Buddhist cosmography, which deri" ves directly from the Hindu. The various localities of Northern India are described only from the point of view of Bud. . . dhist lore. The author, however, does not base himself on the canonical texts, but on the travel accounts and the geographical

r-t

I) shul,chlng~(hu cbitlO'pIl1ch;b,j 7]<. ~ ~ 1m Pf 1M: (Materials and conjec, tures for the emendatlon and critiC of the SiJu;,ching,chu). in « Y~llclung Journal of Chinese Studies I}, n. 3Z (jnoe, 1947), pp. 1/96• .2.) E. g. the researcbes ofR. STEIN an its 36th ,!Juan concerning Un..i, the Champa ktngdom of later times. STEm. Le Lil1'Yi (Bulletin au Centre d'etudes sinologlques all Pekin, vol. II). Peking, 1947. 3) Op. cit. p. 3.

L. PETECH:

compilations of the Chinese pilgrims who went to visit the sacred places of Buddhism. His materials are not elaborated, but merely juxtaposed; Li Tao . .yuan intervenes only with some occasional remarks, and these are seldom illuminating and some. . times directly misleading. It is therefore imperative to extricate the disjccta membra of his sourcesA'lThe paragraphs concerning India form the greater part of ch. I (which we shall call section A) and a small portion at the beginuing of ch. 2 (which we shall call section B). The whole of section A repments Li Tao . .ytian)s commentary upon the following words of the Water Classic: « It (the Ho river Yilf lJ<) turns to the south. . east of it (the K'un/lun) and Rows into the P'o"hai WJ ffl (Gulf of Chih/li)" (£ 4 a). Section B comments upon these words of the Classic: "The Ho river again enters. the Tstung/ling to the south; again it comes out of the Ts'ungl ling and Rows to the north . . east" (f. I a). Considering the two sections as a whole, the sources cited ill them are the following:

I) The Fa.. hsientchtlan

n~ ~ti {!# (Account of Fathsien).

It is Li Tao. . yuan's main source. As it is well known and

fairly well studied. the longer quotations from it are summarized in the present study~ not translated in full. For the text I have followed the edition in Taisl)o, vol. LI, n. 208s; 2) but I have r) Some spade work in this dIrection has already been done by HERRMAl'lN, HEDIN, SOli them TIbet, vol. VIII,

Die West/finder 1/1 JeT clJiuesis,ben Kartogl'aphie, in Svm Stockholm. 1922. pp. 89'406.

z) The textual problems m the text ofFa,hsJen, atl$ing out of its long quotatIons ShIlMin!/cbu. have been studIed by SHIKAZO Mom ~)m: Suikyocbu illyJ I/O b~kenJtIt 71< ~ joE f51 Jf:l Z fE M 1W (The Fa,hslen, chl1au in the ql1otations of the Shl1i-ciling-chu), in the TObii GallUh'O, I (193I), pp. 183'212; they do not

.:::.

ill the

CQlUC'&"lll U$

here.

INfRODUCTION

accepted Remusat's very convenient division of the text in forty small chapters, For the translation, I refer to LEGGE's Record of Buddhistic kingdoms, Oxford, 1886, whIch is still preferable to the last translatIon published, H, A. GILES's Travels of Fa1hsien, Cambridge, 1923. 2) The ShiJJlShih Hsi1Yii;chi ~ ~ t!lJG ftC (Records of the Western Countries by a Buddhist monk). It is now lost, except for the fragments included in the Shtli;ching;cJJtI and for some quotations in the Pien;idien. l ) It is unknown from any other source, and tbis naturally invites the suspicion that it is here quoted under a title dIfferent from the original. Thus in 190 5 the Chinese scholar Yang Shou . . ching 1~ ~f {,J"X (1839'" 1914) identified the SlJiiJ;shiiJ Hsi"'yii/cbi with the Hsi"'yii;cbib f!§' ..t!!~ i~, a lost work in one chUan by Tao/an 3fi 1;( (d. 385). But there are several difficulties in the way of thIs theory,~) and there IS one element which goes straight against it: the descriptlOn of Rajag~ha by Tao/an, preserved in the Ytian . .chien.-Iei. . han Vffi it: ~i illi/,3) is quite different from the description by the Shih;shib Hsi"yikhi in § 39 of the present work. From the fragments of the Sbih"shih Hsi.-yil"chi included in the Shui"cbingl'chu we can infer the main outlines pf the lost work. It was a compilation and not a travel account; it is also certain that it owes nothing to Fa.-hsien, and seems rather to be earlier than the great pilgrim. It included some account of cosmography, a description (perhaps shott) of the Indus valley, a detailed account of the Buddhistic holy places in the Ganges valley, and a description of Central Asia.

rm

I) S. LEVI, Le Tokbarien B. langue de KrllI/cba, in J. As., 1913 11, p·447. ,,) On the question see PELUOT, Tokharien et KllllteMm. mJ. As .• t934I , pp. 7(J.77. On Tao-an's work see CHAVANNES, Voyage de SOllg Yun datls l'Vayiina et Ie GaIIt!hiirl1, in BEFEOj III (1903 ). p. 436, . 3) The Ch'ing encyclopaedia of 1710 Cb. 316, £ J. (1,

[5 ]

L. PEl'J:CH

3) The work of the Indian (Chu) Fa. .wei M~ 'it t1~, of whom very little is known,zl From a quotation in the T'ung..tim 1m: ~li!..~) we learn tbat the name of the work was Fo ..kuo .. chi 1JJt I~ iii: (Record of the Buddhistic kingdoms). 4) The Wai..kuo . .shih )'~ 1l1fi (Matters concerning the foreign kingdoms) by the [Yueb]chih monk Seng . .tsai:Q. frr!ll(;. of the Cbin dynasty (26Y420). Beyond the fragments includ.. ed in the Shtli.-chingdbu,3) there are some (partly parallel) quo.. tations in the Yiian..-chienl!eilhan, ch. 316, £ 2 a. 5) The Fu,tl4ndJtl4l1 1=k ~ {~f~ (Account of Fu. .nan) by K'ang T'ai J",~' ~~. It is tbe travel account of a Chinese ambassa.. dor wbo was sent to Fu..-nan (the Khmer empire oflater times, now Cambodia) by the emperors of the Wu dynasty in Sou.. them China (222;280). In the hinduized kingdom of Fu.. nan, K'ang T'aJ. obtained much information on India, which he embodied in his report. It is now lost, but we have several passages quoted in the Shui;ching..cbu, the Liang1shu ~ ~, the T'ai1p
*

w.

r) See the short notice in the KaMeflglchl/all f.fi ft 1li translated by CHAVANN£S, Voyage dt SOflg YflH, p.437. ;1.) By Tu Yu it Ui (73S , 8I2). Shihlt'tms'"i~ ~ edition of the Comme~cial

Pre~s.

Shanghai.

1935.

ch.

193,

p.

1040 b.

3} Tll~e have been collected in the Rai-J.:llo,!'tl,chih ifij, J1 ~ @ of I844' JULIIlN. R.(ittreWlfllffnlS' bih!iographiqlle.r etc., in J. As., I847 II, p. 274. 4) T~ have been studied by PELUOT, Le FOUIt/QII, in BEFEO, III (1903), Pl>· Z,,1 and 275'2.76.

j) For some quotations see also LAUFER, Smodranica, Chicago. M.thlhtdhlwl, in J. As., 19I8 n, pp. 28 and 34"'35 II.

I919,

Index; and

INTRODUCTION

7) The FUlnanlchi

tx m~ (Account of Fuman)

by Chu Chlh ~ a man of IndIan origin who wrote in the second half of the 5t h century. I) 8) The Fo.-t'u,I{iao,lchuan fj~ IWil ~ fi!f (Narrative of Fo" (u,lt'iao). Its author is o.therwise unknown. 2 ) The name seems to be a transcription of Buddhadeva.

*1

The following table shows the number of the quotations and the approximate number of words concerning India from the above eight works; I have also included same passages which have no expressed attnbution, but which are palpably derived from the Falhsiel1/c1JUatl or the S})ihlshih Hsi,lyu;c1)i.

.

Fa,lhsien .. .. . The Shih"shih Hsi"yu"chi. Chu Fa"wei .. Chih Seng1tsai K'ang T'al Kuo I"kung Chu Chih Fo . . t'u.lt'iao The HanlS/)IJ

QUOTATIONS

WORDS

27

2 18 5

17

4

520 257 844

4

270

2

105

2

128

2

54 54

5

.

2

r) See PEUIOT, Le FOtlmatl, p 280. 2) Sec PELLIOT, Deux IIIII/fraires de la ChiJ1f elt Tilde, 10 BEFEO, lV (19°4), p. 268 It. According to Shen ra,ch'eng l't rIX: (r700;1771), quoted 10 SY, eh. t, f. I2 fI, Fo,t'll,t'iao is but another name for FQ;t'll/teng (~ Ii ffi:. the famous Indian monk who played such ;1n lmportant p.m at the court of the first emperor of the Later Chao dynasty, Shih Lo (319'333); see his biography translated by A. F.WLUGH'l', Fo-e'f/,tetrg. in HJAS, XI (1948), pp. 32V37!. But this Identification lacks surport. nor is £Io.-t·u~ t'jao found among the lccordcd variants of the nanle FM'u-teng. I would rather think of Chu Fo-t'iao ~ {9~ ~, who was a diSCIple of Fo-t'u,>teng and was probably of Indian origin. But his biography in ch. 9 of the .l(oM€ng,cbutTIl (Tllirho. L. pp. 387 (, 388 a) does not mention hIs having written a geographical work.

'*

L. PETECH

From this table it follows that the account ofIndia is a mosaic, of which about the half is drawn from Fa,hsien. There is one peculiarity which strikes the reader at once: although the Shui,ching,chu was compiled at the beginning of the 6th century, all of these materials are much older. Fa/hsien is probably the latest, and the rest go back to the 4th and even 3rd century. Political conditions at the time of compIlation are wholly ignored. When Li Tao/yuan was writing, modern Afghanistan belonged to the Chionites or Hephthalites. wrong. . ly also called \Vhite Huns. They were divided into two bran. . ches; the one ruled a mighty state north of the Hindukush and for a time imposed ttibute even on the Sassanid empire; the other held sway south of the mountains, with thelf centre rOllnd Ghazni (Zabulistan) and extending their rule also over Kapisi and Gandhata. 11 But when the Shui1ching1chu comes to describe the lands north of the Hindukush, it merely repeats the old tales of the Y ueh . . chih and the Sal/wang, going back to the times of the Han. For the lands south of the Hindukush, it brings nothing except relIgious matters; Fa,hslen reigns nearly undisputed. In India proper the kingdom of the Imperial and the Later Guptas is whClIly ignored (as indeed it is by Fa..bsien), and po Htical information is practically lacking. We may conclude these remarks by saying tbat the material of the Sbuj'ching..cl.m on India is nearly exclusively Buddhist and of religious character, and is older than the Shtli.-ching,chu by at least d. century. The hydrography of Northern India is largely fictitious. The Ganges of the ShtiitclJing;chu is not so much a real river, as 2

)

I) See now CHI:nstmAN, LeI ChioniteslHepbtalite.r, Cruto, 194 8. z) Ch. 2, f. 1 I!~bj left untranslated 10 the present study.

[8 ]

INTRODUCTION

a thread in the narrative, by which the places and regions describ . . ed are somehow brought into relatIon WIth each other. Li Taoolyuan or his sources have not much regard for geographical facts, and sometimes the bearings are interchanged, as when the Ganges IS made to Bow north of VaisalI, Saketa and Kapi . . lavastu, or when in Magadha it Bows from east of west simply because Fa. . hsien happened to travel in that direction. The fictitiousness of the hydrographical sequence is the main reason why I have preferred to study the text quotation by quotation and not as a whole, even If this may appear to hinder a pro . . per appreciation of Ll Taoolyuan's work. But in this chapter it is the quotations alone which offer some interestj the slender contribution of Li Tao. .yuan in the way of connecting text can safely be left out of consideration.

SECTION A (from eh. I) 4b

1. The 8Mb,slllb I-Isi-yu,cbi says that A-uou.-ta IlbI ~fff ~ (Anavatapta) is a great mountain. Upon it there is a large and deep water pool and a kingly palace. the towers of which are very large. This mountain now is the K'un,lull Ihl W- mountain.

The form Amou. . ta (ancient ·a. . tI~tI;d'at) is common to all the older translations in the Chinese Tripitaka. According to WATTERS, it transcribes the Pali Anotatta. I } But PELLIOT has pointed out that "ta implies a sonant dental and that the original must rather' have been Anodatta.'} This goes to show that the name was known to the Chinese under a form current in the Prakrit of Central Asia. On the K'unAun of Central Asia, a subject which lies out" side the limits of the present work, there are older studies by De Saussure, Ferrand etc.; but the best investigations are due to SVEN HEDIN and HERRMANN in vol. VIII of Southern Tibet; and to EBERHARD, Lokalkulturen im alten China, vol. I. Leiden. 1942, pp. 2451248, where much material is conveniently ga... thered. For K'unAun as the source of the Huangho accord... ing to the Han,-shu, and its later divorce from that river and

*

1) Oil Yilall Clm.lil/lg's travels, London, 1904. vol I, p. 34. 2) Review of WATTERS' book 10 BEFEO, V (1905), p. ,p6. For the transcription value of ~ (da or ({ba, never ta) see S. LEvI. Le (atriloglre rIes Yakfa dans 14 Mahiim;yurT. in J. As" 19151. p. 13t.

[II ]

L. PETteR

idenufication with Anavatapta, see HEDIN, op. cit., pp. lO'-I3. In any case it remains certain that In the age of the Sbui"ching"chtl the name K'un.llun applied to Western and Central Himalaya.

.:r

2. The MII-t'ien;(zikiJllall *'Si': X. f!Jj. says that [he Son of Heaven ascen, ded the Kun-lull in ardel to sec the palace of Huang_u Jft 'Iff and to raise the mound on the tomb ofFeng_[ung ~ 11&. Hug-lung IS the god of thunder, The pa!.:l.e;: of Huang-ttls thus the palace on the A,noMa,

This paragraph is a kind of explanatory note inserted by Li Tao/yuan in the middle of a quotation from the Sbib,lshih Hsi, Yii",IJi. If according to the Shih/shih Hsi'yulchi the K'un;lun is identical with th~ Anavatapta, then all the particulars attril buted to the two mountal11S must coincide. As the oldest extant a.ccount of the K'un,..lun is that of the Mu.-tiel1.-tzu"cbuan, the comparison with this old book imposes itself. The MUIt'ienltzu,ochtlan is an account of the travels and sports of king Mu in the western borderlands of old China, which took place in the 10th century B. C. The work was found in an old tomb which was opened in 280 or 281 A. D. As we have it, it is certainly heavily interpolated, but its nucleus stems to be authentic. The passage in question') is comprised in that section of the text which describes the voyage to the fabulous Hsi.iWang~mu -pg- :E-f~, a queen or a population in the extreme West; this section has been conclusively shown to be an inter.polation posterior to the finding of the work in 280/1 A. D.") J) MI{4'ima,;(I1,cblldn (Ssil'pu,tt'lIng,k'oll edition. Shanghai, 1936). ch, 2, f. 9b, It j~ $ l~ in the translation of Emu., Mwt'iel/lts;;wclmen, or narrative of tbe son of heaven (~ult\(Juglyclled) Mu,in China Review, XVII(llm"9),p . .23 0 ,

.3) See DaSAUSStJrul, Lt voyage all rol MQ~ atl Twkestall Orielltal, m] As., X9Z0 u , pp. 1$MS6; id., La ,tlatiOIl at'voyage all rai MOil (al/ IX si~cle lt, Pfi· l47/l 80; and above all HEAAMANN, Die Westliinder ill der chinfs;Hhen

Xlfff/)s,'!1J?bIt, pp,

183;x86,

[12]

SECTION A

The K'un . .lun of the Mu"lien . . tzu . . chuan has nothing to do with the Himalaya; even if it is not, as maintained by HERRMANN and others, the name of an ancient people of Central Asia, it cannot but be sought for in the ranges on the western border of the original Chinese homeland in the Huangho basin. I } But this does not disturb Li Tao . . yuan ill the least. Huang.. ti is the mythical founder of Chinese culture, who according to tradition lived ill the third millennium B. C. Feng/lung is a personage of not very common occurrence in Chinese mythology; he is mentioned, however, as the god of thunder in the Li. .sao ~IfE I~~' str. 57, and in Hua.iman"tzu tiE f11-T C Hundred phi1osophers" edition of the Sao...yeh shan;, fang fa"hsing fr§~JlJ}J}~1j;" Shanghai, I922),ch. 3,f. 3b.2 ) 5a

3. From this mountain SIX great Hvers issue. To the west of the mountain there is the great river called Hsin-1:'ou :4rr (Slndhu).

sm

This paragraph is really the continuation of § I, after the interruption caused by Li Tao"yuan's discussion in § 2. It continues therefore the quotatlOn from the sbih"shih Hsi. .yii . . chi. The hydrography of this passage is fundamental; it lies at the basis of the whole first two chiians of the Shui;ching,..chu. The hydrography of the Buddhist texts can be divided into two great traditions. According to the cosmology of the canonical and post. . canonical texts, the great rivers of Jambudvipa are five: Ganga, Yamuna, Sarabhu (Sarda), Aciravati (Rap d) 1) The equation with Anavatapta belongs to a much later period. On the whole question of the meaning of K 'Ulvlun in the fil'St millennium B.C., see the above quot-ed works of Hedin and Eberhard. and particularly HALOlJN, Seit Ulatlll kanntm tllt Ch/llesen die Tocbarer oaer Illdogermanen iibel'lJallpl, Leipzig, 192.0, Pl" I03- 1 7Z. 2) See also the shOlt note by H. MA:;PERO, Legellde.r mrlh~lilgiql/u dauf [e Cwu.. king. in J. As., 1924I, p. 5711.

L. PET]lCa

and Mahi (near Gaya): it is a purely Indian list. The tradi. . ciOll of Northern Buddhism prefers another scheme: we have the Anavatapta (the unheated), a lake on the top of the Himalaya, with a Niga king presidmg over it; four rivers issue from the lake: the Ganga to the east, the Sindhu to the south, the Vaksu (Oxus) to the west and the Sita (Tarim) to the north; this list spreads over the whole of Middle Asia. I) The hydrography of the SIJtti1chitlg.tc1Jt1 shows a contamination of the two traditions. Li Tao/yuan has adopted the ideas of the Shihlshih Hsityutchi, of which work the present para is almost certainly a quotation. The change of the Anavatapta into a mountain is due to the influence of the K'untlun and perhaps also of the Mew. The six rivers are made up of the four of the northern traditions, but with names partly changed: Indus, Ganges, r. . lolch'i.tti (for which see §§ 57,,60 and 65; corresponding mainly to the Oxus) and the great Amoulta river (described in ch. 2, £ 6 a; seems to correspond to the Cherchen",darya and Tarim). To these are added two of the rivers of the southern tradition: YaD IOU and Salhan (Yamuna and Sarayii; for both see § u). This hydrography, and chiefly the change of the Anavatapta into a mountain, left few traces in the later geographical tradi. . cion, which soon came to be deeply influenced by Hsuan. . tsang and generally by the enormous widening of geographical know", ledge which took place in the times of the Teang dynasty. Still, it is echoed in the Kt/alti1chih 18 til! i!;, written in 642 by Hsiao Teryen :filW· ~~ ¥g (5581654), which speaks ofthe Amou,ta. identical with the K
m

m

Sr:CTION A

4. The Kllang,chib of Kuo I,kung says that the Sweet River (it 7j() m the eastern part of the Western Countries (W ~); Its name IS Over Hsint'ao;'iff 11fGJ. The mountam [from which It Issues] IS to the west of the T'lenchu ~ region (IndIa). Its water IS sweet, therefore 1t is called Sweet luver IS

:x

The surname .. sweet" given to the Indus is difficult to account for; there seems to be no parallel for this in Indian sour... ces. The passage is perhaps corrupted, as we cannot otherwise explain the situation of the Indus in the eastern part of the Western Countries. 5. There IS tack-salt as white as rock crystal in large pieces; It is quarried and employed. K'ang T'aJ says that An...hsi .!};( I@' (PersIa). the Yueb,.chlh J1 !{;, T'ien.chu (Ind1a), as fat as Ch'1\1./M/t'iao/Yl1 ~JU 3Jl~ fJM ~. all of thtm h,we the hIghest opimon of thIS salt

The mention of rocktsalt refers of course to the Salt Range in the Panjab between the Indus and the Jhelam. The interesting name Chia.-na...6ao (the addition of the last character ...yii is due to some clerical error) will be discussed under § 55. 6. The monk Fa,hsien says that artet he had passed the Tsung,ling ¥.l!: ~. he entered the terntory of Northern India. From this place he followed the range to the south,west for 15 days etc. [omitted].

Follows a verbatim reproduction of the first half of ch. 7 of the Fa;hsien/chuan, describing the pilgrim's journey through the Hanging Passages; efr. LEGGE, pp. 26"'27. Towards the end of this passage, the text of Fa;hsien has the words JL *~m*~, and then goes 011 to say that neither Chang ChCien not Kan Ying (the famous explorers of the 2nd"'Ist As this is not avaIlable to me. I quote from the SInh,.bi cb!ngli J)l.!. We. .iE tit. i. e. the com" mentary on the 8Mb,. hi by Szu-ma Cheng 1'ij Ali t{ (8th century).ap. Shlh-chi.ch. TZ~. f. 7 h. Cft. ClIAvANNES,Review of MARQUART'S Eransbabr,jn J. As. 190r l l.p.S5); and FRANK£, Beilrage zlir 1(m/l/llis$ der Tiirkflolker lind Sky/hen Zmtra/rfSims, Berlin, 1904. p. $6, [ 15]

L. PETECH

centuries B. C.) reached this spot. I ) Legge translates the four characters as C' (the places and the arrangements] are to be found in the Records of the Nine Interpreters ".~l No such records ever existed. and the translation is wrong: jL ~ is a not un. . common idiom in the dynastic histories, and means in every case "through nine translations", i. e. "thlOugh many linguistic borders".3l But the questIOn is complicated by the fact that the Shui1cIJing1chu (ST, SW and SY) has for the last characl ter the variant ~, C'to interrupt". If we accept the reading ~c. which seems to me preferable, then the meaning is: « [This is Jthe account [whIch has come to us] through ninefold trans" lations (i. e. through many intermediaries). since ncithet Chang Chtien nor Kan Ying reached this spot". The reading ~ which is scill well attested, gives a less satisfactory meaning: « [Access to the place] is precluded by ninefold translations 0. e. by the enormous distance), so that neither Chang Ch'ien nor Kan Ying reached this spot )). 5b

7. I have examined all the accounts ill the chronicles, and this is what they say The countty of Chi'pm lTI ~ has a moulltam trail made of stone slabs. The path Is about one foot wide. The travellers walk step by ~tep cla..~ping each other. Rope bridges ate following each other for more than 20 Ii, till one arrives to the HanglOg Passages (~lft). The difficulties and da.ngers are mdcscdbable

t) Taisl,~. vol. LI, p. 858 a. z) LEGGll, pp. 26127. GILES, Travels of Frr,.bsifll. p. 10: "Accoldlllg to the R<:COtds of the Nine Interpreters". 1) See e. g. Shib,chi, ch. 123, f. 8 b (= Hiln,sbu, eh. 61, f. 3 a): 1It jL iW, .. i';Ollnules which are reached through many, ninefold translations". ChHI T'anjl sbu, th. no. f. "" b: ;h; ~ .7L ~;:. Tfff W. « from 10.000 Ii the barbalJans through nlne translation. come to Visit us ". A similar idiom :lft ~, with the $,l\lm mc,ming of ~lUmerous linguistic borders, occurs in Hual.-han/tzu, ch. 20, f. 2 d, in 1L/l Fia1l4bll, ch. itS (8g in the POoI/wpen), £ 3 a, etc.; it has remained faitly com¢noo in the dOCtltne!1taty style,

mm

SECTION A

This paragraph and part of § 8 have been translated by FRANKE. Il The words from " The travellers walk ... " till .e ... to the Hanging Passages" are a quotation from Han.lshtl, ch. 96 a. f. 12 b. Our text brings even a good textual emendation; the current editions of the Han.lshu have =: -T- JE. " 2000 li ", while the reading of the Shui'ching.lc!m, =-::. -t-.!l! c. 20 li " is undoub ... tedly the original one. On Chi.lpin see the Appendix. There seems to be no agree. . ment about the exact position of the Hanging Passages, a name which often occur in the earlier Chinese accounts of the Pamir till the time of Hsuan.ltsang. Fa. . hsien's description certainly refers to the difficult passage along the Indus below Dare!. west of Gllglt. 2 ) It is a controversial point whether these Hang... tng Passages are the same as those of the Han . .shtl. According to STEN KONOW they are the same. a} According to HEDIN and HERRMANN they are not, and the Hanging Passages of the Hanlshu must be sought for in Hunza (Kanjut), east of Gilgit; 4) the latter opinion SUlts better the geographical conditions (see the following paragraph). Our text, as it stands, seems to include the Hanging Passages in Chi... pin. But what We have here is simply a patched/up quota. . tion from the Han.lshu, and the latter work makes it clear that the Hanging Passages are on the route to Chi...pin, but not in Chi1pin. The meaning of Chi.lpin is here uncertain, but as the ulti... mate source is the Hawshu, the probability is more in favour of Gandhara. . Kapisi than of Kashmir. I) Beitriige etc .• p. 58. :z) See the discuSSlon in Sir Autel STEIN, Scrifldi.r. Oxford, I9.:n, p. 8. 3) KONOW, C"YpIlS lnuriptiomlm I/IIlkarulII, voU, II-I (K1Jl!rofhlbi Inttriptloll1). Calcutta. {929. p. :xxiii. 4) SOllt/mll TIbet. vol. VIII. pp. 6-7. 32.

2 - L. PETECH, Northern India Dc£oraing to tM Shui-l;hUl8-1;hu

L. PErEeR

For the value of the li in the Shui~ching,;chu. I cannot do better than refer to the study of R. STEIN, 1) I think we can accept for practical purposes his average of 400 metres. 8. Kuo I-kung says that west of Wu-ch'a .\f.J ~ there is the country of the Hanging Passages. It is a mountain gorge which is lmpassable; only by drawing out ropes one may ClOSS It; hence tbe country bas receIved Its name. The I1atives dwell In the mounta.Ins. They cultivate [ their fields) between stone walls. Heaped rocks are employed for budding bouses. The people jOin their hands fot drmking; it IS what we call monkey dnnkmg. They ha.ve white goats 2,) and short-stepping horses. They have donkeys, but no oxen,

Another quotation from Kuo r. . kung is given by Ma KUOf han: ,( In the Hanging Passages the tombs are in the dwelling huts. [The t):"aveller] enters a stretch of about ten Ii, and [this] difficult crossing IS the Hanging Passages. Once they ate crossed, [the traveller] eventually reaches a plain of about 100 li. Its population is not dlfferent [from that on the other side of the Passages ~]" .s) The plain of 100 li below the Hanging Pas. . sages must be the valley of Gilgit. It cannot well be defined as a plain, but it is the greatest widening in the Indus vaHey between Baltistan and the Panjab. WU/ch'a, ancient 'uold"a, corresponds to an original *Uga. 4) According to HERRMANN, it is to be situated in Sarikol. south of Yarkand. 5l 1) Le Lin'}'i, pr. 1M:! . .3) ST. SW and SY have 8 11!. <, white grAss" which seems out of place here r have followed SS (0 /f·). 1) Yii-IJiltvshan1a1Ii,chM-sbu, Kuang-d!ih. eh. 1:, f. I a-b. 4) P1!UJO'I', A propos dll TokharitIJ, in TP, XXXII (1936), pp, 2.76-279. s) SOllthem Tibel, vol. VIII. pp. 19 and 451. It is certanly not synonimous with Wu-eh'ang (U44iyilla), as maintained by LUPERs, Pali Ilddiyana, III Zeils,brijt fur lIIrJ.kfrhtlldt Spr(/(bwisft/1ScTxljt. IL (I920), pp. 2W236 (= Phtlologica Indica, Gottingen. t9-40, p. 4~)' [18 ]

f

SECTION A

The H short. . stepping H of the text refers. accordmg to FRANKE, to the amblmg gait of the Central Asian and Pamil ponies. 9. These are those Hangmg Passages, of whKh the monk Fa,hsien also says that after having clossed the river he aItlved to the countty of Wu,ch 'ang J.~"* (Ud4i yana). The kingdom of Wu'ch'ang is [a part of] northernmost IndIa. It IS a kingdom where the Buddha amved. The Buddha left the mark of his foot in It. The mark IS long or shalt accordmg to the f.'l.ith of the man 6 a [who bchold~ It]. Up to now it stIll eXists. Also the stone, where [the Buddhal drIed hiS robe, IS st111m eXIstence

This is an abstract of the first two paragraphs in Fa. . hsien's ch.8 (LEGGE, pp. 28/29) . . The stone showmg the footprm! of the Buddha, with the Kharoghi inscription Bodhasa Sakamtll,lisa padal,li (foot. . prints of the Buddha Sakyamuni), was seen and photographed by Sir Aurel Stein near the vIllage of Tirat in Upper Swat, about long. 72°30', lat. 35°7'301/, Also the boulder on which the Buddha dried his robe, IS still extant on the right bank of the Swat nver, four miles south of Tirat. I) 10. a) The dver Indus further Haws towards the south,west; then it bends and Hows to the south,east It passes through Central Indm. b) On both banks there is level country. There is a kingdom called P'j,ch'a p~t ~,2) where the law of the Buddha is flOUrIshing. c) [The pilgrim) continued following the P'll,na'pan till JiJ:U: .) rlYer. On the banks of the nver to the right alld left there :lrC twenty Ntigbiiriima. (1) This dyer flows through the k1t1gdom of MM'on,lo ¥ Jfti B (Mathura) and joms below it the river Indus. From this river [0 Western IndIa there are many kingdoms.

ms

r) Sir Alirel STEIN, Arcbaeological tOllr ill Uppa Swat 111111 atljfmd bill/racts (MASI, n. 42), Calcutta, 1930, pp. 55'56, 59,61. For the Inscription there see STEN KONOW, Corpl/s Inmiptionum Im{icartllll. II,I, pp. 8'9. 2) Or P'i,t'uj the second character has both pronotlnclalions. 3) SS has Man, fll9. Fyhsien (Taisbo, LI. 859 a) has p'wmt M»l~.

L. PETECH

e) front here to the 50mb all [ the country] IS Madhyadda (r.p II). Its people ate rich. f) The inhabitants of Madhyadda dress and eat like the Middle Kingdom (4~ Wlll); therefDle they ue called Madhyadda. g) Smce the parillirv«fJa [of the Buddha], the fDlm; of ceremony, laws and rules practised by the holy commUI11t1es, have been handed down from one generation to the other without interruption. From the uver Indus to the regions of Southern India and on to the Southern Sea, there are 40.000 11.

This paragraph is the worst confused in our text. It consists of some isolated passages from Fa..-hsien; the connecting text seems to be due to Li Tao..-yiian and is mostly a string of mistakes and misunderstandings. The chapters of Fa..-hsien, from which this text is culled, describe with sufficient clearness the pilgrim's departure from Bannu. his crossing of the Indus, his journey to P'i..-ch 'a and along the P'u;na;pan river; then they give an account of the prmcipal features and customs of Northern India. The following passages in our text are from Fa..-hsien: b) -

last sentence of ch. 14 and first of eh. IS (LEGGE,

P·41 );

c) - beginning of ch. 16 (LEGGE, p. 42); e) -

beginning of second paragraph of ch. 16 (LEGCE,

P·4 2 ); g) = end of ch. 16 (LEGGE. p. 47)The connecting text begins (a) with twisting the Indus towards the south..-east and sending it to Central India, i. e., in the language of the Buddhist pilgrims, the Ganges valley. Then (d) it consequently goes on calling the Ganges by the name Sindhu, and makes the P·u,Ina. .pan, which cannot but be the JUmna, join it below Mo"t·ou. .lo; this last is of course Mathura, and its mention here is due to a reminiscence from Fa..-hsien. [<10]

SECTION A

The mistake probably goes back to texts employing the word

sindhu in its widest acception, that of .. great river", It is. however, peculiar that just below (§ 9) a quotation from the Shih.-shih Hsi. .ya ...chi describes the exact course of the Indus. In (f) Li Tao. . yuan gives a rather unhappy explanation of the word Chung...kuo, which is the translation of the Sanskrit Madhyadd<1. and at the same time a name for China; it is partly based on a statement of Fa... hsien. I) The geographical names in this paragraph are all taken from Fa. . hsien, P'j . .ch'a (ancient bli. .d"a) transcribes regularly *Bhiqa. According to CUNNINCHAM,~) it is Bhua or Bhera, on the bank of the Jhelam in the Shahpur district of West Panjab. The modern town, bUIlt by Sher Shah about 1540, is on the left bank of the river, but " Old Bhera, as it is still 10'cally known, is represented by a large debris/covered mound situated to the north of the village of Ahmadabad close to the miles across the river hamlet of Sardarkot and about 3 from Bhera ",3) The identification can hardly be doubted; it is, however, strange that the name Bhera or BhicJa does not occur in inscriptions and that there is no trace of a kingdom of Bhiqa in Indian tradition. P'u... na"pan (ancient b'tlo.-nii"pfJiirJ) is evidently the Yamuna~ but the phonetic equivalence is obscure. Discllssing the P'u..na of Fa... hsien, Weller suggested an alternance b. .m in the first syllable similar to Bombay...Mumbay; he quoted some (highly suspect) reconstructions by De Groot and Schlegel in support to his contention. According to him, b'uoIHa transcribes (Ya)

+

I) Beginmng of ch. 8 (LEGGE, p. 28).

2) Ancient Geography of Illdid, Calcutta, 1924. pp. 177-178. 3) A. STElN. ArclJoeo[ogical Reconnaissance!;11 Nortb.-WesltTII India alld Sot/lb,.&tstem lrall, London, 1937. p. 59.

L. PETECH

mana. I) But our P'uma1pan, of which P'uma is evidently only a shortened form, predudes this reconstruction. The name remains as unexplained today as It was in LEGGE'S time. U. The Sbib,shi!J Hst'yil-chi says that the rIver Indus flows through Clwpin, Chien,yueh $.It lug, Mo/holla ~ iiiiJ JIilJ ,2) all these kmgdoms, and enters the Southern Sea; so it is.

The shih. .shiIJ Hs;. .yulc!Ji is a Buddhist work, so Chi1pin probably means here Kashmir. This is of course wrong. as the Indus does not Aow through Kashmir proper, but the Shih, shih Hsi"yti1chi is accustomed to take liberties with hydrography. Concerning Chien/yiieh, its second character (ancient iiwtlt) is found fairly often at the end of Indian geographical names in the Chmese texts. As tightly pointed out by S. LEVI, ytJeh is a sort of vague geographical exponent; it originally represented the final suffix °Ucttt, quite frequent in Indian geographical names, and was later extended even to names of which °uatl was no part,3) Chien is the first character (with a small modificatlOn) of Fathsien's Chientt'o/wei M! ~t iff. Chien"Yl1eh is therefore Gandhara. The ancient pronounciation of Mo"ho/la was mua;xa1liit, which regularly corresponds to a form *Maharat. I know of no ethnical name in this area (middle Indus) that can be brought into telation with this, unless it be the highly doubtful Maharaja Janapada. a tubal state the eXIstence of which was inferred by K. P. JAYASWAL from a mention in the Aft
z) SS:

I ViJ I .

3} UVl. u catalogue aes YakFa dalls la Mab~lIIiiyiirl, in J. As., t9IjI, p. 60.

[22 ]

SECTION A

in the Panjab. I) But the reading Maharojajanapadasa on these coins is definitely wrong,'ll and the data of PaI}ini may be inter... preted otherwIse. Unless no other evidence is forthcoming, we cannot identify this phantom tribe with our *Maharaf. But no other suggestion can be made at the moment. 6b

12. To the south_west of the A_nou_ta mountain there IS the nVCl calIcd Yaomu 3tii jtJ{. To the south-wcst of the mountain, somewhat to the east, there is the uvel called Sa-han IW: ?(t. A little more to the em there is the river called Heng..chia I/TI ffm (Ganges). These three rivers i$sue together from the same mountam. All of them enter the rIver Heng tTI (Ganges).

After having described the Indus, the Shih/shih Hsi"yii"chi takes up again the list of rlVers issuing from the Anavatapta. HERRMANN has equated Yao,nu with the Karnali and Sahan with the Sarda, wisely accompanying this tentative iden. . tification with a query.3) I think he was only half right. We have here three rivers. aU of them issuing from the Anavatapta at a small distance from each other, and later unitl ing to form, or at least flowing into, the Ganges. The first great river which one comes across while travelling from the basin of the Indus to that of the Ganges, is the Jumna. The ancient pronounciation of Yaoll1u is iau"nuo, and the transcrip ... tion value of these two characters in the 6th century was rat! and niijno. 4 ) I take this to be the transcription of some Prahit fotm of Yamuna with attenuated nas.al, e. g. s.omething like the Ardhamagadhi ~ or the form transcribed by aV8erilni as Jaun. r) K.I), JAYASWAL, Hindu Polity, Calcutta, 1924. vol. I, p. 159. :2.) The correct reading IS Rajap'jajanapadasa; J. ALLAN, Cataloglu of the AlJcjfllt Illdia [ill the British MllseulII}, London, 1936, p. civ. 3) HllRRMANN, Die WestUnder etc.• p. 24 1 4) LEVI, Le catalo$flc des Yak!" aaM III Mal)amayuri, pp. Il3 and us.

COllIS

4 .

L. PEtECH

Sa.. . han must have exchanged places, by an error of the text or otherwise, with the Ganges; no large river exists between Juml1a and Ganges, and the Sa;han must be looked for to the east of the Ganges. The second character han ~ is an obvious error for yu -'=f:. The ancient pronounciation of the name is sJtdiu. which transcribes Sar(a)yil; it is the modern Sarda and its prolongation, the lower Gogra. 13. The FU,nalJdiman of K ang T'lll says that [he source of the river Gange. (Heng) Issuel, on the farthest north,west, flOm the K 'ull,lull. III the middle of the mouma.tn there arc five great sources; all the nvers flow separated, but aU of them issue f[om these five great sources. The great nver Clllh,lllvh tt !£& ~ lssues from the north,west of the mount:un, flows towards the southeast and empties itself In the ocean. The Chih,hu,h is therefore the Gallges ltself.

K'ang Tai's five rivers ate those of the Buddhist canonical tradition: Ganga, Yamuna, Sarahhil, Aciravati, Mahi. xl Chih (:ti},hu;li is a wrong spelling of Pa (tlR)"huAi. which is found in the already quoted passage of the KuO/til cbih,2) as another name for the Ganges. The first two sylla; hIes of Pa/hulll (ancient b
and the Kua,ti;chih. I) S« back

pp.

l31X4.

P;vhu(,li) = Valgu was first tentatively sugge~ted by Autlfllt.rune tMltlctl~« Silllskrite dll T«dllii"killg, in TP, XIII (1912), p. 355 11. ,2,

The

cquatloll

PELLIOr,

SECTION A

14" Accordmgly, the Shih,-shib Hsi,yii,cbi has a 1m of the bends of the Ganges. To the north of the Ganges there are fOUl kingdoms. Westernmost is the one between the bends of the Indus and of the Ganges It is the kl11gdom of Chu,i,na,ho 1liJ ~ (Kuslllagara).

ms m

The distortion of the geographic picture of India in the Shih" shih Hsi"yU"chi is particularly evident here. The four kingdoms are Kusinagara, Vaisali (see § 19). Sankasya (see § 23) and Kapi" lavastu (see § 29). They are not described in any order, nor is Kusinagara the westernmost of the four. All of them are hund" reds of miles away from the Satlej"Jumna doab in the Panjab. 15. The Fa,hsien,c/man says that the Ilver Ganges flows towards the south, east, to the south of the klllgdom of Kusmagara. [There is a place] to the north of the CIty, between two trees, on the uver Hsi,licn,ch'an :fF; fill lli! (Hitanyavati). Here, on the bank~ of the river, IS the place where the Bha, gavan, WIth hIS head to the !lorch, performed his parillirvoHa, and where his reltcs were dIvided.

Except for the first sentence, this para is a quotation from Fa. . hsien's ch. 24 (LEGGE. pp. 7°"71). In Hsi"lien"ch
7a

)

16. The Wai,kllo,sbib of Chih Seng.-tsai says that after the parinirllofJl1 of the Buddha the Devas I wrapped the Buddha mto new whIte pieces of cloth and m:1.de offerings to hlln Wlth sccnted flowers. ;'Vhen seven days were com.pleted. they took him Ollt of the royal palace in a golden coffin and brought him b~yond a small river. The name of the river was HsiAan'na M 11M JJtI (Hiraf].ya). At about three Ii from the royal palace and to the north of it, [they bUllt a. funeral pde] cmploymg sandal wood as fuel. The Devas tried severally to ignite the pIle, but It did 110t burn. MahaA
eX

I) S. LEvI, La mission de Wa/(g' Hillel~tle dans l'lnde,

in J. As., 1900 u , p. l:\4'

L. PETECH

Then after this, other fuel, though unbndled. took fire by itself. The kings wanted relics. They measured [the ashes] with gold bushels. and obtained eight Jro~a and four pecks. All the kings. and the lOlds of the gods, of the Naga and of the spirits, each of them took a little [of the ashes]. They carried it back to theIr own kingdoms. 111 order to build a temple of the Buddha over It. King Aioka erected a stopa on the place of the parinirtJii~la of the Buddha. The two trees 100 received a stopa. bur thIS is no longer extant. The name of these trees wa~ 50/10 ~ tree (ia/a). The Bowers of these trees are called So,lo-ch'ja ik *«: i1: (lalaka). The colour of these flowers is whIte hkc hoadiost or snow. and it~ perfume is tn.'ltchless.

n

The traditional accounts of the death and cremation of the Buddha grew up from simple beginnings to the legendary tales of later texts. See on this subject the exhaustive study of

Die Uberlieferung vom Lebensende des Buddha (Abh. Ak. Wiss. Cottingen, phiL·hist. Kl., III series, nn. 29, 30), Gottingen, 1944~48. Also PRZYLUSKI, Le ParinirviilJa et les funerailles du BtldalJa, in J. As., 1918, 1919 and 1920.

WALDSCHMIDT,

There is nothing distinctive about Chih Seng. . tsai's account; it follows the standard version of the Mahiiparinirviil)astitra; 111 some particulars, such as the starting of the funeral procession from inside the town and not from the place of death, it follows the version of Po Fa. .tsu. I) Hs£..lan"na (ancient xiei,lan. . nd) transcribes more exactly a Prakrit form Hiraiina. For the location of the cremation ground, the Wai. . kuo. .shih agrees with Hsuan,ltsang, who also places the cremation stupa to the north of the city, abollt 300 paces on the other side of

the river/.1l The name Liu ...sha, meaning shifting sands and usually applied in Chinese texts to the Central Asian desert, remains 1) WALDSCflMU)l', Die Uberliiferung tJOI/I Lebe/lSet/ae WA'l"n'RS, vol. n, pp. 39"40 •

:a)

des BliddiJa, pp. 275, 283.

SECTION A

unexplained. According to most of the texts, Maha>Kasyapa was coming from Papa (Pava) to Kusinagara. when he heard of the decease of the Buddha; according to Fa;hsien's version of the MahaparinirvafJasiitra, he was at Dak~iQ.agiri, south of Raja. . g!ha; according to the Vinaya of the Mahasanghika, followed by the Mahavastu, he was on the G;dhrakuta.l} In no canonical text anything is found which may recall our Litvsha. 7b

I

17. The FeI,"all-chl of Chu;chih says that from the kingdom of Lin, yang.:f*#k there IS a land lOute of 2000 Ii to the k1l1gdom of ChulIch'en 1f;: 1!J!t. One may travel by cart or on hor~eback, but there 15 no watel route. The whole k1l1gdom honours the Buddha. They had a monk; when he died be was to be cremated. For the crematlon more than one thousand faggots [were employed], but stIli he sat 111 the mIdst of the file. So they took hIm Ol1t and placed hIm insIde a Stone bmld1l1g, and 5111ce that Ume for about slxty years the corpse remained as before, Without being corrupted ehu ehih saw It with his own eyes. That man still remains there mtact hkc a diamond (vajra); clearly he will last forevel The caUya of hiS reltcs IS vllible and for all umes~} they are incor_ rupted. His knowledge of Void, as they call It, was infirute. HIS great sCIence was .boundless.

The first three sentences of this passage have been translated by PELLIOT; 3} he also collected several other texts concerning Chin;ch (en and Lin;yang. Lin. . yang is still unexplained. On Chin;ch'eh the best study is that of S. LEVl.4) Chin;ch'en is identical w1th Chin;lin:,*: ~~ of other texts. They correspond to the Suvannabhiimi of the Niddesa and to the Suvarnaku; . qyaka of the Harivamfa and of K~emendr~; chin, gold, translates

.

.

l) WALDSCHMIDt, op. cit., pp. 2851 289. 2) Thus I translate the characters -Ilk 72... Under their headwg the Pd,wen,yUn' JII if~ 3t fJl }(.f, Commercial Press edltion, Shanghai, 1937.1" 654 c registers only the present quotation of the Shlli1cblng1ciJII and nothing more. 3) Le Fou,nan, in BEFEO, III (I903), p. 267. 4) PtoUmee, ie Niilrlesa et la B!hatkathii, III £tIldes AJiatiqtlt; de /' &afe Franfai!t d'Extrfl/lt Orient, Paris, r926, vol. II, pp 29'37.

L. pmrCH

Suvarn,.a, and chten or lin (ancient rjft! and Ijen) transcribes the syllable ~ya,I) The location of this semi . . legendary name cannot be ascertained with precision, because it was a floating geogra. . phical expression referring to countries to the east of the Gulf of Bengal. We may look for 1t in Lower Burma or in the Malaya.n Peninsula. 2 ) Li Tao/yuan apparently inserted here this paragraph because of some vague ressemblance with the funerals of the Buddha. Bm Chu Chih's account refers to some other personage; it is perhaps the echo of a local legend concerning some famous monk, which he heard from the Indian traders. 18. Thi~ river flowmg wlth many vagaries runs mto the Ganges. The Gan, ges again flows eastward, to the north of the Clty of P'j,shMi Pfrt it ;FO (Vaisali).

"ThIS river"

IS

again the HiralJ.yavati (Gandak).

19. The SbiiJ,siJ,IJ HSI,yu,chi says that P'i-shMl hsieh,H ME 3ffilfll€ (VaisaIi).

1S

the kmgdom of WeI'

*

20. The Wai"kuMhih of Chih Scng'tsal says that from the kmgdom of Wei.-hsieh,li there are SO ybjallil to the city ofWang,shc::£ (RaJagrha). The city has a perimetCl of three ycjant/. The house ofWevch'ieh Mt Itif (VlIualakirti) g a is to the SQuth of the palace inside the great enceinte, I at a dIstance of 7 Ii from the palace. Tl11~ building is destroyed and one can see only the place where it stood.

This passage has been translated by PELLIOT. Autour d'tme tY(lduCtioH S411skrite du T ao.-!d,lking, in.TP, XIII (19 12), p. 3 82 n. t) Lilvl, 0p. CIt.• p. 36. :0) See also LUCK, Cauntries neighbouring BIIP/na, in ]ourtJal of t}g Burma Researc/) So. Ntly. XIV (1924). pp. 15I~15B. SuvarIJ.aku4ya of the Kau!aliya Artbasii.rtra seems to be: tllther located in Assam. See N. N, DAS GUP!'A, Kar!laSJiUar(la and Swar!laku4ya, III InJ;"n CUlfllTf, V (rgaS-9), Pl" H9-34I.

SECTION A

The yojana is not used as a measure of length in the accounts of the Chinese pilgrims, with the exception of Fa. . hsien's, where it alternates with the Ii. This fact has been studied by WELLER; he concluded that short distances in Ii mean travel on the state trunk roads, where distances were officially marked. I) It is of course difficult to say whether this interesting result applies also to the present passage of the Wai. .kuolshih; many more quo .. cations than this single one would be required for reaching a reliable conclusion. The value of the yojana is of 4 kro!a or 40 Ii:) Starting from a Ii of 400 metres, we may attribute to the yojana of Fa..hsien and of the Wai..kuo..shih an average of 16 km. A perimeter of three yojana, i. e. 120 Ii seems much exagge.. rated for a place like Vaisali. According to Hsuan,.tsang the city measured 60 or 70 Ii in circuit, and the citadel only 4 or 5 li.3) In this text we have the first mention of that famous building, the house of VimalakIlti, which was the scene of the may perhaps help to find the site of the building. But there are

I) WELLER, Yojana tina Ii bei Fa,brien, in ZDMG. 1920, pp. 225"237. 2) S. Ltvx, POllr l'bifloire all Riimiiya/1l1, in J. As., 1918 1, pP,I$3;160.

In a PllS;' sage of the WailkllMbib quoted 10 the Yiimr"clJten,leI,ban, eh, 316, £ 2 ii, we have the clear statement" the yojalla. that IS in Chtnese 40 11 ". 3) WATTBRS, vol. II, p. 63. 4) The Vmraiakirtilriraefas;.;tra is preserved in three Chinese, a ':tibetan and a fi~" mentary Soghdlan version. See the bibliography in LAMO'l'I'E, L~ ttaite ae fa gratlde vertll ae Jagme, pp. ,5I6'51711. 5) WATTERS, vol. II, pp, 66.-68. 6) S. LEVI, La tt1ifsiott ae Wang HiUflrlt!'e aall; rInae, pp. 315'316. [29 J

L. PETECH

conflicting statements on the su.bject. Another quotation from the Wai,kHOl'shilJ says that the house of Vlmalakirti was inside the town and that its foundations were still to be seen.t) The FOI tSlmgl't'unglc!;i places it to the north-.. east of Vaisali.~) 21. The monk Fa..hSlcn says that to the north of the city there is a large grove

r

and a shrine in] two sectiollS where the Buddba once dwelt. Ougll1ally the womall Yen ..p'o-lo {it jJ& it (Amrapali) and her £'1mJly had presented It to the

Buddha and built a vibiim in it

This pal a is a quotation from the beginnmg of Fa. . hsien's ch. 25 (LEGGE; p. 72 ). 22. Three 11 to the north ..west of the city thele is a stupa called "bows and weapons discarded", etc. [omitted]

10 9 <1

Then follows the legend of the thousand princes, as related Fal'hsien's ch. 25 (LEGGE, pp. 73"'74). 23. The SbIb-sbib Hsi1'wchi says that inSIde the bend of the Ganges next

IS the city of Seng.. chl[..sban.. navchieh ffir 31m S :fIt 1~ (Saul kaiyanagara). The Buddha descended to this kmgdom by the three fughts of precious steps.

to the ~a.st there

Contents parallel to the followmg. Sailkasya is now SalV kisa in the Farrukhabad district. For the archaeological re" mains there see HIRANAND SHASTRI, Excavations at Sankisa, in Journal of tbe u. P. Historical Society, III (1927), pp. 991'IIS. 24. The F«..bsiclI"bflall says that the river Ganges flows south,eastward, to the south of the klllgdom of Seng,chia,shih iif 3l!!!}j(Ji (Sarudi4ya). It is the place wbere the Buddha descended from the Trayastrimsa heaven towards the

I)

YwtIJchim,/eMxl!I, ch.

316.

.::) CfIAVANm>S, Lrs illJcriptiMS 1896, p. 2$,

£ .2 11 . ,binoueJ' de Bodb.. CaYI1. 111 ReVile d'bis/o/re des religiolls,

SEcrwr-r A east by three Rights of precious steps, after having preached the Law to hIs mother. The precious steps then dIsappeared In the ground. King Asoka built a stupa on the place of the precious steps. Then he erected a stone pillar; upon the pillar he placed the Image of a hon. When some heterodox teachers showed little faith, the lion roared; as an effect of the fright theIr hearts grew sincCle.

This is an abridgement of the account in Fa/hsien's ch. 17 (LEGGE, pp. 47"'50). 25. The river Ganges again Rows eastward to the city of Chl'plll.'jao,i .w,t The city touches on the south the river Ganges Six or seven Ii to the north-west of the Clty. on the northern bank of the river Ganges, IS the place where the Buddha pLeached the Law to all hIS disciples.

!fr AA; !1{ (Kanauj).

Except for the words « the river Ganges again flows eastward to ", the whole paragraph is an abridged quotation of the first half of Fa. . hsien's ch. 18 (LEGGE, p. 54). Chi"'pllvjao/i is an error for Fa/hsien's Chi. .jao"'l (ancient kiill,nijiiu,(z)i, transcribing a Prakrit *Kanjauj); it is due to the attraction of the name ~hi. . pin, much better known in China at that time. The Sbui. .cbing. .chu has also the addition of the word " south "j it is missing in Fa. . hsien, who simply says that the city '
r) WA'I'TERS, vol. It pp. 3,40-34l.

2) HUBER, L'itinhaire all pllerin Ki l'e dan! I'Inde, ill BEFEO, II (190;1.), p. 2;57·

L. PETECH

26. The river Ganges again flows south,eastward, to the north of the klllgdom of Sha.-chih y.J; ~!\.t (Sa:kcta). If one goes out of the cIty of Siiketa by the sou, thern gate, on the east of the road is where the Buddha, after having chewed his willow branch, stuck it III the glO11nd; It grew seven feet, wHhout increasing 9 b not dimmhhmg. And now It is still there.

Quoted from the first part of Fa. . hsien's ch. 19 (LEGGE,

pp. $4-'$5). 27. The river Ganges again flows south,eastward, to the north of the CIty of ChialWciAo,wei um M€ 1.f€ 1~i (Kaptlavastu). Formerly it was the capItal of king Suddhodana. Fifty 1i east of the CIty there was a royal park. The park had ponds and streams. The queen entered a pond and bathed. When she came ollt on its northern bank, after walklllg twenty paces, she put out her hand towards the east and grasped a tree; there she gave bIrth to the prInce. When the prince fell to the ground, he walked seven paces. Two Nagas squirted water to wash the prince. Then a well appeared there, and this IS where all the monks draw their drinking water from.

Except for the first two sentences, the whole paragraph is a quotation from Fa...hsien's ch. 22 (LEGGE, p. 67). Chia...wei. .hwei (ancient ka...wiAa"jriii) is more exactly the transcription of a Prakrit form *Kavilavai, from an earlier *Kapilavadi, corresponding to Sanskrit Kapilavati. ' ) 2ft The prmce, in company of Nan,t'o »!f(; Il'B' (Nanda) and others, tossed away an elephant. Trying hIS hand at a contest, he shot an arrow whIch entered the ground; now a spring is there, which serves as dnnkmg,well for travellers.

This paragraph is a quotation from Fa. . hsien's (LEGCE, pp. 65"66).

ch.

22

I) See e. g. PBLLIOT. Les IIOIliS proprer au MllinalipaiiiJQ, in J As" 1914II, p. 401 If. BAtl.m", Gllmlhari. in BSOS, XI (1946), p. 786, derives it from a Gall' dhru.'l Prakri( form *Kavilavas; but Pm:..Llor's theory seems to account better for the phonetic' ratts. •

SECTION A

29. The SMh,shih Hsi'y,j-chi says that three Ii to the north of the city, by the river Ganges, there is the spot where the father kmg accepted the Buddha [as his son]. They have bUllt a temple and placed m It an Image of the father daspmg the Buddha to his bosom

This pIece of information IS qUlte new; neither Fa"hsien n01 HsUan. . tsang mention this temple and statue. It is one item more which should be kept in mind by the future excavator of Kapilavastu. Ganges is of course a mistake' for HiraQ.yavati. 30. The Wai"kllo"siJih says that

The following long quotation is a most intetesting descrip" don of Kapilavastu and of the journey of prince Siddhartha to Ra.jag~ha and Bodh . . Gaya. Its great importance may be realiz" ed if one thinks that it is completely independent of Fa... hsien and Hsiian... tsang, hitherto our only sources on the topography of the birthplace of the Buddha. a) the kingdom of Chla-wel,la,yueh rt!!! ;m.)\]& (Kapllavastu) has not got a king now, The city and the ponds are desert and dirty, and there is, only the empty space. Thele are some tlpas(lka, about twenty households of the Suya loa family; they are the postenty of king Suddhodana. Ot\ce they formed four fa, milies who dwelt mside the old City and acted as IIpiisaka; formerly they highly cultivated reltgious energy (tJirya) and still maintallled the old spirit. In those days, when the stupas were dIlapidated, they completely repaired them,X) The king [of Kapilavastu], over and above this, took care of one SIUP:!, and the king of Ssti,lwt'lao;f;L ifiiJ fIX! sent gIfts as all, aid to 6cish it. But now there are [only] twelve monks who dwell inside that [city].

Of this section there is a para.llel text in the Yiian~chien . .lei. . 316, f. 2 a, which runs thus: .. It (the WaJ,.kuo . .shih) also

han, ch.

1) All the editIOns have ~ ~: but the correction ii i~, which was kindly suggested to me by Professor Duyvell,dak, Seems necessary.

~

- L.

~ECH. N~rthern Indlil Q"cordlllll tQ fhe

Shllr-clllnll-,hn

L. PETECH

says that the kingdom of Chia. .wei. .lo. .yueh is now subject to the kingdom of Po . .li. . yi.ieh 1m: ~ I~' There are also some upa. . saka of the Sakya clan, about 20 families. They are the posterity of king Suddhodana'>. In the 4th century A. D. Kapilavastu was subject to Magadha, so it is practically certain that POlli. . yiieh (ancient pua. .Ueidrvt) corresponds to Magadha. Phonetically, if we disregard the usual geographical exponent y,ieh (ovafi), it may be explained as a shortened transcriptiol'l of Pataliputra. We are reminded of the Palibothra or Palimbothra of the Greek sources and of F~vhsien's Pa. .lien. .fu, the original of which was also characterised by the loss of the dental in the second syllable. The phonetic similarity with Po . .1i of § 52 is apparently merely casual, as the characters are quite different. Concerning the Sakya upcisakas in the ruins of Kapilavastu. who are mentioned in our text only, ST has a note quoting the Miitafzg1stHra. There arc four versions of this text in the Canon (Taisho, XIV, nn. 551, 552; XXI, nn. 1300, I30I; Nanjio. nn. 643/646), but none of them seems to contain anything bearing on this tale. Sswho . .t'iao (ancient si. . x8. . d'jeu) is a regular transcription of Sihadiu, a Prakrit (not Pili) form of the Sanskrit Si~hadvipa, i. c. Ceylon. The passage of the Wai",ktJo . .sbib quoted in the YUal1lclJien..lei. . haH gives a short description of Ssil. .ho/t'iao; it is mostly limited to the Buddhistic relics there, foremost among them the four footmarks of the Buddha, which are also mention.! ed by Fa. .hsien in his description of Ceylon. Ssil. .ho . .6ao is therefore to be kept strictly apart from Ssil. . 6ao ~ ~ of the I"'WlJ.lchih ~ 4'm j& II and of the T'ai"'ling"'yii1lan and Lo"'yaHgl r) Quotations in LAUllI!:R,Asbestosalld Salamander,in TP. XVI (1915),1'1'.351,373.

SECTION A

rir

chiaAan1chi ~ 11m ~ ~.I) It has been convincingly shown by FERRAND that SsUo"t'iao IS simply a wrong spelling for Yeo" t'iao, Java, as shown by its connection with the Mountains of Fire (volcanoes) and with th~ typically Javanese fruit maja. 2 ) We know of Singhalese foundations in Bodh"Caya, but this mention of a Smghalese pious gift in Kapilavastu stands isolated. b) The marvelous tree, which the excellent queen glasped when the Buddha came to life, IS called hsu,ko ~n l~iiJ (ttloka). Kll1g Asoka made, out of lapislazuli, a statue of the queen 10 the act of graspIng [the tree] and giving buth to the prlOce When the old tree had no more offshoots, all the iYalllana took the old trunk and planted It; and over and over agam It continued itself till the present time. The branches of the tree ate as of old, and they sull shelter the stone statue.

The tree grew in the Lumbini garden, now Rummindei in the Nepalese Terai. It IS known that Asoka erected a pIllar there. which is still standing, although broken. Asoka's orio" gina1 statue (of which this is the only mention) is no longer extant, but the local temple still preserves an ancient sculpture representing the nativity of the Buddha,3) which may be a copy of that of Asoka. c) Also the outlmes of the marks of where the prince walked seven steps, are still preserved today. King Asoka enclosed the marks with laplslazuh on both SIdes, and again had them covered over WIth one long slab of lapislazuli. The people of the country contmuously make offerll1gs to them with ~weet" lob smellmg flowers One still sees clearly the outlmes of seven fowprints; I although

I) Quotations 111 PELLIOT. DellX itinerl/lw etc., in BEFEO, IV (1904). p, 3S7 H and CHAVANNES, in J.As .• 1903 u , p, 531. 2) FlmRAJIlD, Yediao, Ssetl,tiao et jalla, 111 J. As , 1916 lt , pp. 52Vj3l. I could not consult the study of TOYOJ!ACHI FUJITA on Ye-t'lao, Ssii.;t'iao and Ssu,ho-t'iao. 10 Memoirs of the FaCilIty of Literaf/lre alld Politics, l"aih~kll Imperial University. 1. I (X9;>,9)

3) P. C. MUKHERJI. Antiqtlities ill the Tarai (AS! Report vol. XXVI, Part I). Calcutta, IgOr.

L. PETECH

there is now a slab coveting them. it makes no diffclence. And agam, people may covet them thickly wltb several1ayers of heavy cotton (karpasa) and fasten these on the chiseled stone; and yet, [the marks] shme through them and are even brIghter than before.

According to the Afokiivadiina, king Asoka came to the place and prostrated himself before the seven footmarks. I) But his encasing of them is mentioned nowhere else but here. d) When the prince was born. the kings of the Nagas came to the prince and. the one to the left and the othel to the right. sqlllrted watet and bathed the prince. The one Naga was seen to squirt cold water arid the other warm wareri [thiS water] produced two pools. Even nowadays the one 15 cold and the other l5 warm

efr.

Evhsien, ch. 22 (LEGGE, p. 67) and Hstiall"tsang vol. II, P.14).

(WATTERS,

e) The prince had not yet come out of the house Then 011 the tenth day he came out, went to the royal field and sat under a jamhfl tree. The god (Jf the tree honoured the prince with seven kmds of Jewels. but the prince did not accept them. Then he meditated on his desire of leavLOg hls home The royal field IS at one kro!a (f1~) from the palace; a kl'o{a meanS 1ll Chinese

(fi)

ten Ii.

Cfr. the Aloklivadana (PRZYLUSKI, pp. 253 . .254); the Lalita" vistal'a. ed. Lefmanll (Halle, 1902"oS), vol. I, pp. 12S"l29; Fa. . hsieo, ch. 22 (LEGGE, p. 67); Hsoan"tsang (WATTERS, vol. II, pp. 1.-8). According to Hstian.-tsallg, the royal field was 40 Ii to the north . .east ofKapilavastu. l) The prince wen! out of his house on the fifieenth day of the third month. The four kings of the Devas came to meet him, and each of them grasped one Woe of tue hatSt. At the same time all the spitlts and Devas from all sides

r) P1t1.ftuSKl. La legmde de l'empereur Afoka, Paris.

I923,

pp.

25!12)2

SECTION A

filled the sky and showeled heavenly scented Rowers. Then he arrived to the Ho,nan,mo,ch' lang ViJ l¥I Bj!¥ ~ffi fIver and became a framana on the II a banks of thIS nver. The nver Homan,mo/ch'iang is ten yojalld to the north of Kapllavastll. This nVCI 15 at thirty yojollo from Lo,yueh.-chih Mit 1m Ij!~ (Riijagrha). i c. the klOgdom of P'lOg.-sha HIi. i'P (Blmblsara) Then the BodhIsattva passed qUlckly t1uollgh [Rajagrha]. and kmg Blmbisara came out to see the BodhIsattva. The BodhIsattva stayed one day insIde the Suvloll/na I~ tW: ~jjS (VeluV,ln
The journey from Kapilavastu to Rajag~ha shows a few parti.. cularities in respect of the canonical accounts. The Ho.;nan;lmo.;ch'iang river is the Anoma of the Pali text, the river where the Bu~dha took up the condition of a religious mendiant. Ho is of course an error for AI ~llf. The old pronounciation was 'al'naml11/tla;lg'jang, which seems rather to transcribe a Prakrit *Anamma..gari(ga). According to the Ma .. havastu, ed. Senart, Paris, 1882.-1897, vol. II, p. 164, and to other texts, Anomiya is a city 12 yojana to the south of Kapilavastu .. In any case the « north" of our text cannot be correct, because the Buddha went south.;east on his route to Magadha. Accord;ng to the traditional account, the Buddha, afier having passed through the city of ,Rajag~ha, went straight to the Pal}'9ava hill, where he was visited by king Bil1lbisara and entreated in vain to accept one half of his kingdom. The Velu .. vana grove, instead, was presented by king Bimbisara to the Buddha, when the latter came to Rajag~ha afier having obtained

rnr

I)

ss:

Ch'ueh,chih

MI.

L. PETECH

the bod!;/, The Wai,kuo,shib seems to have confused two events. Sui.llouma (ancient zWi~,,11u"na) is an interestmg transcription, probably derived through a Central Asian dialectal medium. I } Geographically speaking, Pan"ta"po.lch'ou corresponds to the paQ.4ava"parvata of Buddhist traditton. But in our case the ancient l'ronounciation puatl"d'atlpuatI4z'j~u~) and its meaning (White Hill) show that the Chinese translator had before him an original PiiQ.4ara/ parvata; this is a form used in the Mababba; rata, but very rare in Buddhist texts. Our text.is important for settling the location of this famous hill. B. C. LAW has discus, sed the question basing hImself on the Pali sources and on Fa..hsien and Hsuan/tsang; he identIfies the Pa.Q.C;lavaparvata with modern Vipulagiri, north" north/east of Rajag~ha."} The Wai,kuo,SfJib perfectly supports this result, which may be accepted as established. T'an/lan (ancient d'8m I Ian) transcribes a Prakrit form Dham" maranila. A Dharmiirat;tya is known from Brahmanicallore; it is mentioned in the Vayu"PurlilJa and in the Mahabhirata, not as a hill, but as a tract of land; " it is, at least in part, no other sacred site than the precincts of the Bodh/Gaya temple represent; ing the jungle of Uruvela of Buddhist literature ",4} In the Buddhist tradition Dharmarat).ya is an hermItage where the Buddha betook himself after the Sermon of the Wild/deer Park; he was coming from the place of Uruvilva;Kasyapa and was t) Pru:.uOl', PJpiyiill > PO-si/III, in TP, XXX (1933), pp. 95199. Our SUl.llou'ul must be added to the several examples there quoted of mi transcribing a Pmrtt vi or ve. 2) The 1.\5t character is apparently cOlrupted, but I am unable to testore the corred: one. 3') B. C. LAW, R
4) B. M.

BARlTA,

Gay
r (Calculta, 1934), pp. 16-17, 72.

SECTION A

going to the Ajapilanyagtodha. I) But the name is not usually connected with the Buddha's journey to the tree of the sixlyeats meditation, and nowhere in the texts is Dharmara1J.ya represent; ed as a hill. On the other side, there really was a hill, which according to tradition was the first place reached by the Buddha on his arrival to Bodh.,·Caya: it was the Gayasira or CayaSIr~a, which is .. the rugged hill to the south of Gaya town, which rises some 400 feet above this town and IS now known as the Brahmayoni hill ".:a) Position and distance from Rajagtha seem to fit quite well our T'an. .lan. We may conclude that the Waf" kuo/shih has by mistake applied the name of the DharmaraQya hermitage to the Cayasiqa hill. Pei. . to (ancient puaida) IS the palmyra tree (Borassus flabellifera), the leaves of which (Sanskrit pattra) were employed as writing material; the name pattra was erroneously applied by the Chinese to the tree. s) In Chinese tradition the palmyra tree usually takes the place of the afvattba (Ficus religiosa) of the Indian tradition as the tree under which the Buddha obtained the bodhi; this is the case, e. g., in Fa. .hsien's ch. 3 I (LEGGE, p. 88). But here it apparently stands for that afvattba (pippala) tree under which the Buddha practised penance for six years; efr. § 43. YiIeh,lchih seems an abbreviation ofLo,lyueh,lchih, employed some lines above (as well as in Fa,lhsien) fOf transliterating Raja.! grha. tiut thIS ca11not possibly be correct, because the Bodhi r) Mabii/l<1stll, vol. III, pp. 434, 430. 2) B. M. BARUA, Gara al/ll Ell/Mba Gara, voL I, p. rI. . , 3) This at least is the usual explanauon; it takes pei,to as an abbrevlatlon ofpw to,/o of later texts, whIch means undoubtedly pat/ra; see e. g. GltllS, Chillese,Engllsh Dictionary, p. 1078. But r entertain a strong sLlspicion that in the case of cady texts sllch as F;vhsien and the Wai,kfJMbill the word JUMo mlly be independent of pei, /0'/0 and may simply transcube the Sanskrit vata, another name of the nyctgrodb4 or Ffells illalCa.

L. PETEeH

tree is at Bodh Gaya, south of Gaya town. "North" must be corrected into "south", and Yuelvchih stands for Bodhl Gaya; the text of the whole passage is much corrupted. It may be noted that Chih Seng. .tsai employs the character cbin rf- for Chinese; this means that he lived in the tImes of the Chin dynasty (265/420). g) The prince went out of his home at twenty-nIne and obtained the bodbi at the age of chirty,five. This statement IS diffclcnt from the si/trar, and the records therefore do not agree.

This sentence is difficult to understand. as according to the universally accepted trad1tion the Buddba left his home at twenty.. nine and obtained the bodbi at 35. just as stated by our text. Chu Mou. . wei ~~ l&t. a commentator of the Ming dynasty, who wrote in 1615, states tbat our text alms agamst the Fu .. yao,ching }Mf Ill?: *~. i. e, the LalitmJistal'a, which (accordmg to him) lets the Buddha depart from home at nineteen and obtain the baJhi at thirty,I) But neither the Sanskrit text nor the Chinese translation 2) of the Lalitavistara make any mention of the age of the Buddha on these two occasions.

*

31. Chu Fa-wei says that the kingdom of Chla-Wekwei i!!!! *frr ~hIr (Kapi .. Java&lU) is the kingdom of India where the Buddha was born. It is the centre It b of 3000 ~um and moons and of 12000 I heavens and earths.

32. The Fumall'fhuotJ of K'ang T'ru says that formedy, 1ll the times of Fan Chan 1{f. 1Vf. there was a man from the kingdom of Tean_yang 11l'i£ ~J} called Ch~....hsianglli ~~, He went from hIS countty to Ind1a, and stage by st'lgt trading all the way he amved in Fu,nan.. He told [Fan] Chan of the Indian CU5tomh the expansion of the [Buddhist] religion, the accumulaUoll

*'

I} 5S, f. H a. nishi. vol. llI. n.

~)

18(;.

SECTION A

of wealth, the gleat fettillty of the countty, [so great that everybody could] follow his own deSIres; the great kmgdoms on every side had honoured it for a long time. [Fan] Chan asked what was its distance and how far one must travel to reach It. [Chla-hslang}Li saId: "India may be at more than 30 000 11 from here; to go and retUln, thlee years and more arc reqUIred, and one may take even four years to return thence. It is consIdered the centre of heaven and earth "

ThIS paragraph was translated and commented upon by PELLIOT, Le Fou;nan, pp. 277;278, to whom r beg to refer. Fan Chan was a king of Fu.man, who relgned ca. 225~205

A.D. 33. The flver Ganges agall1 flows eastwald to the Lan-mo W~ ~ (Rama) stupa. To the side of the stupa there IS a pond Ius ide the pond a Naga IS keepIng the watch Kll1g Asoka wished to destroy the stupa and to build 84.000 new stfipas. But he became aware of what the kIng of the Nagas used to offer, and recogruzed that such things could nOI be had anywhere; therefore he I21T deSisted. TIllS place became empty and deserted, without mhabitants; but herds of elephants came to fetch water with thm trunks and to squIrt it on the earth When green SterClllia grew together in quantity, the elephants ploughed and the crows weeded the sot!

Except for the last sentence, which is an embellishment of Li Tao~yiian; this paragraph is an abridged quotation from Fa~hsien's ch. 23 (LEGGE, pp. 68~69). Fa/lmen's and Hsiianl tsang's 1) Ramagrama was at 200 Ii (km. 80) to the east of Kapilavastu. It IS however to be noted that this Rama is the product of a late legend, and the original Ramagrama of the oldest texts (Mahaparinirvol}astitra etc.) was somewhere on the banks of the Ganges between Magadha and the country of the V ~ji.2) I) WATTERS, vol. 2) PllZYLUSXI, Le

II, p. 20.

partage dC[ reliques au Btiddba, 111 Mllnnsp Cbillois

IV (195$16), pp. 35&365.

it B~flJdhiquef,

L. PETECH

34. The river Canges again flows eastward to the confluence of five rivelS But the five rivers which meet here ale not detailed. When Ananda was going etc. [omitted).

There follows the account of the parinirva"a of Anal1da. copied with some slight abridgement from Fa..hsien's ch. 27 (LEGGE, pp. 7S~77). The scene of the miraculous decease of the favorite disciple of the Buddha is on the Ganges, on the route between New Rajagrha and Vaisiili; tbe legend is related at length in the Afokdvadcina. ' ) The five rivers ale clearly real ones, and thus they cannot be put in relation with the five rivers of BuddhIst cosmology. I am inclined to think that the «confluence of five rivers" does not indicate a smgle point (even if the text of the Fa"bsien .. cbuatl gives the definIte distance of four yojana from VaiSali), but that shott stretch between Atrah and Patna where the Gogta. the Gandak, the Son and some smaller streams flow mto the Ganges. 35. One yoj(lIla to the southern side of the rlver,crossmg one arrives at E. f!l! ~ (Pa~aliputra) in the kmgdom of Mo,chleh,t'l ub ~ ~ 11k (Magadha). The ctty IS the capital which was ruled by kinr; Asoka,

me city of PaAlcn,fu

etc:. [omitted].

There follows the description of Pataliputra, which is an abridgement of Fa/hsien's ch. 27 (LEGCE, pp. 77"80). I may point out that Pa"lien..fu (ancient pa"lian"piuJt) transcribes the same Prahit form *Paliqt.put(ra) 2) which appears in Megasthenes as Palimbothra.

!} PRlYLVSKl, La legemir de ['tmpercllr Afoka, pp. 337"'340. For a sculptural tcprcsent.1tion of thlS legend see J. Ph. VOGEL, Le parimfviiljQ d' A/wlna d' aprer till f!lJsmli~ grkoilJolidihiqllc, in BEFEO, V (1905), pp. 417'418. 2) ThiS 1$ more exact that the *Pa:liputr(a) suggested by BA1LEY, Gandbad. p. 784.

SECTION A

13 II

36. The river Ganges agaIn flows to the south"cast, past a small isolated rocky hill. On the top of the hili there IS a hut of stone. This hut of stone faces south, and in olden times the Buddha stayed In it. Sakra, king of the gods, questIoned the Buddha on fOlty-two subjects. and the Buddha one by one traced the replies on the rock. The marks of his tracing are still extant.

This paragraph corresponds, with some abbreviations, to the first paragraph ofFa. . hsien's ch. 28 (LEGGE, pp. 80;8!). The small hill is that near the modern city of Bihar/) • LEGGE (but not GILES) was in doubt whether the tracing was done by Sakra or by the Buddha; our text allows us to decide the question in favour of the Buddha. This legend refers to the famous Sutra oj the Forty"Two Sections, which is traditionally considered as the earliest Buddhist text translated, or rather adapted, into Chinese by Kasyapa Ma" tailga in 67 A. D.2) The tradition here related by Fa/hsien is not drawn from the text itself of the sutra, which merely states that the Buddha, questioned (apparently at Benares) by some bhiksus on matters of doctrine and diSCIpline, gave his reply in 42 points. 37. The river Ganges again Rows westward to the New Oty of RaJI' by kmg A"shs"shlh IwI 1}H -I!!. (Ajatasatru); etc. [omitted].

g~ha; It is the one built

There follows an abridgement of the second half of Fa,. hsien's ch. 28 (LEGGE, pp. 8I,,82). describing Old Rajagfha. In

I) B. C. LAW, Riijagrba ill ancient literature, p. 19. See T'ANO YUNG,T't,lNG, 11JC eaitiolls of the SsiilsbiMrIJ'thallg"chiHg, in HJAS, I (1936), pp. 147"r55. Translated in BEAL, A (atflfa of BliddblSt mipfllrfl frqm the Chinese, London, r87I, pp. r81kz03. The date of 67 A. D. is legendary, but the siitra cannot be brer than the middle of the 2nd century; MASPERO in BEEEO, X 2)

(1910).

p. 97. and

LEvI,

111

J. As., 191Il, p. 44 8.

L. PETECH

connection with the last §§ it must be remembered that the Ganges here is no real river and has nothing to do with the places described; it is simply a tread in the narrative. 13 b

:18. [Omitted] On tlm hill the peak IS beautifully green and IS FleW, tl!sque and imposlllg; it g the highest of all the five hllIs .

. This paragraph is th~ legend of the G~dhrakfita hill, which finnls the first part (as far as ~'hence comes the name of the h1U of the Vulture C,lVern") of Fa . .hsien's Cb.29 (LEGGE,pp. 82... 83). 39. The SNIt,siJi/; Hsi,ywchl says that the Grdhrakuta peak IS to the northeast of the CltY of Riipgrha of A,noMa LookJng westward towards thIS lull, there atc two mmlnm which rise at a distance of about 2'3 It from each othel. On the p'Ith between the two, vultures alway~ dwell on this range. The inhabItants 1411 give to It the name of Ch'j,she -fj !Kl peak. In the Bll MJ (IndIan) language Cll'l,she means vulture.

This paragraph and the following ale welcome additions to our knowledge of the famous hill G~dhrakii{a. The ': R:1jag!ha of Amou;ta" is of course Old Rajag~ha. But the name of the Anavatapta is absolutely unexpected here. Still, there are faint traces extant of a connection of Amou;ta with Rajag!ha in the Chinese Buddhist tradition. The lost Hsi;yti~cbilJ of Tao/an (4th century A. D.), perhaps the oldest account of the West by a Cbmese monk, said: ec In the king;' dom of Mo. . ho . -1ai Ef- tiIT ~Jl. there is the mountain Amou/ta; the city of Wang/she (Rajag;ha) is on the south/eastern side of the mountain ",t) Mo...ho ...lai, ancient t1tu8. .x8. .W, seems to be Magadha t although the transcription is very anomalous. Two and a half centuties later, HSiian... tsang mentions on the north

SECTION A

side of the south...west declivity of the Vipulaglri " 500 hot springs, of which there remained at his time several scores, some cold and some tepid; the source of these spnngs was the Anava~ tapta Lake to the south of the Snowy Mountains, and the streams ran underground to this place ".1) Our text is much more definite than Tao . .an and Hsuan~tsang, as it seems to employ the name Anavatapta to distinguish the Rajagtha of Magac.lha from other cities of the same name. The exact value of this Anavatapta remains, however, uncertain. The position of the Grdhrakuta is not yet settled. Rajagtha is sUlrounded by a girth of hills, which now bear Jaina names; but the Pali texts mention a traditional list of five hills. CUN... NINGHAM identIfied G~dhrakt1!a with modern Sailagiri; 2) MARSHALL identified it with Chhathagiri, east of Rajagfha?t and his view has been followed 111 the Archaeological Survey's guide of Rajgir; 4) B. C. LAW after a long discussion concludes in favour of Udayagiri, south~east of Old Rajag~ha.SI The Pali texts may favour B. C. LAw's contention, but not so the Chinese sources. The Shihl'shih Hsi. .yti.. cbi (4th"Sth cenl tury) places the G~dhrakt1~a to the north least of the town. Fal hsien (5th century) merely states that he entered the vaHey of Rajag{ha from the northern gap and bore round the mOllntains to the soutb...west on a rising gradient of fifteen Jj till he arrived on the G{dhrakiita. IS} Hsiian..tsang (7th century) says' that r) WA'1"l'ERS, voL II, pp. r53,154. 2) A'ICiel/t Geograpby of India, pp. 534'535· 3) Rajagflla and lIS remams, m ASIAR, I905,6, Pl" .90'93. 4) M. H. KURAIsm & A. GHOSH, Gllide (0 Rajgir, DelhI, 19~9. The map at the end of that booklet is most convenIent for folIowmg the present discussion. s) Rajagr/Ja ill alJ(:ieht literature, pp. 6. 8"9, 30-32. 6) LEGGE, pp. 82;83. Also the Chinese text (£1.862, c) has south.-east. Gll.lIS'S south..west (p. so) is a mistake.

L. PEiECH

he went north/east I4 or 15 Ii to the Grdhrakuta. which is continuous with the south side of the north mountain. xl Chi, yeh, who left for India in 966,~) says: "To the north/east (of Rajag~ha) he ascended a great mountain. Following a winding path he arrived to the stupa of Siiriputra. Near a stream is found the stOpa called ,e Descent from horse and march against the wind". Thence he traversed a gullet and arrived at the sllmmit of a great hill where are a great stOpa and a temple. It is said that here the seven Buddhas (of past ages) preached the Law. To the north of this hill there is a plain where the stupa of the birth of Siiriputra IS found. One half of the norl thern mountain is called the Peak of Vultures. The city of Rajag~ha is at the foot of the hill ".3) Fa/hsien is too vague to be of any use, but the other three are in complete agreement. Hsiian. . tsang's Northern Mountain is not the whole spur Vipu. . lagiri...Ratnagiri... Chhathagiri, but only its northernmost palt, Vi, pulagiri; only in this way it is possible to conciliate his statements that the Vulture Hill is to the north...east of the town and that it is contiguous with the south side of the Northern Mountain. from the unanimous agreement of the Chinese pilgrims, I conI elude that G!dhrakuta must be sought for somewhere on Rat,. nagiri. On the maps the hill looks as terminating with two larger peaks and a smaller one; two of these must correspond to the two summits of the Shih. .shih Hsi..ya ...chih. Of course the question can only be deterrnined on the spot and I must leave the archeologists to settle it finally. 1) WAn-EllS, vol. II. p. 151 . .::)Onrhi,dateseeCHAVANNES,Nole.rsmo[ogiqtles,I.inBEFEO,IV(I904).pp·7S'77· 3) Ht.nlliN, L'ftinmirt III peJefin Kl,ye JaIlS l'IIIJe, in BEFEO, II (1902), p. 1.58. The very abort account of Chi,yeh is as precise and accurate in its topography as that of HsiWlo'tsang. It is a pIty that It IS usually overlooked in dlscussmg moot points of ancient Indian geography.

SEC'rION A

"Looking westward towards this hill" means looking at from the plains on its eastern side. Ch'i/she, ancient g'ji1zja, transcribes gijja. the Pali and Prakrit form for the Sanskrit grdhra, vulture. G~dhrakGta

40. Also Chu Fa,wei says that the kingdom of Lo'yueh,chih (Riijag~ba) has a mountain of divlIlc vultures, which 1U the Indian language is called the Ch'l,sha peak. The mountam I~ of gteen rock, and the summit resembles a vulture. King Atoka sent people to chlsel Ollt the rock, to insert artificially two feet at the two Sides and to carve Ollt and adjust Its body. It can still be ~cen now: If one looks at it from a dIStance, it resembles the shape of a vulture. Therefore they call it hill of the diVine vulture.

Chu Fa;wei's account implIes tbat when the hill was already famous on account of its traditional connection with the Buddha, AS-aka caused It to be adjusted by stone;cutters in order to give it an aspect corresponding in some degree to its name. The two feet were probably hewn out of boulders and fastened to the rock by iron or stone spikes. No such artificially corrected hilL·top has yet been noticed. nor it is likely that it shall ever be. as it must have been deeply corroded by the exposure to wind and rain d.uring twenty/two centuries. Still, an investigation of the hill. .tops to the east of Rajagrha may bring yet some surprise. 41. Several accOuntS are in, dIsagreement and the distances oue different too. But here we adhere to Fa-hslcn, who personally went to pass the mght on this h1U, recited the Sh()u,lcflg_yclI -~. ~ f1& (Su"iiirgama) and made offerings of scented flowets, as to an authority for what he has seen and heard.

From the first sentence one may infer that already in the 5th century A. D. the location of the Grdhraku~a was 110 longer wholly certain. The quotation is summarized ftom the last sentences of Fa/hsien's ch. 29 (LEGCE, pp. 83 / 84). It is not quite sure

L. :PETECH

whether this Surahgama is the same as the Surangamasamaahi included in the Chinese Buddhist Canon,l) as the former was revealed on the Grdhrakuta and the latter at VaisalI. 42. It flows agalO westward, to the south of the uver of ChHvyeh jl!IJ JlII~) [GoingJ thirty li, one amves to the wooded place where the Buddha practhcd penance for SIX yeats; etc. [omitted].

(Gap)

There follows the description of the holy places of Bod hI Gaya, copied with some slight abbreviations from Fa. . hsien's ch. 3I 1'p. 87/89) (tIll" at all these places topes were reared ").

(LEGGE,

43. The Wai..ktwsbib speaks of the P'i'p'o..h !lIlt ~ ~ (pippala) tree. The Buddha ~tayed under that single tree for SIX: years. The woman of a VIllage headman (~;;t -/;() offered to the Buddha plentiful nulk ..gruel ill a golden bowl. The Buddha accepted the milk'gruel. He stood all the Ni,lten,ch'an M i!E jf,t{! (Nairaiijana) river, took a bath, then on the flver,bank he ate the m.tlk gruel; then he threw the bowl into the water. It floated against the current ISb for loa paces, then the bowl sank in the river The king of the Niigas, Chla.. litchiao ~ 3
[sa

:m

This paragraph is clearly the continuation of § 30. The pippala tree (Ficus religiosa) is the same as the pd.-to tree of § 30 (f). For the legend of Sujiitii., the daughter of the village headman (grbapatD, and of the Naga king Kalika, see e. g. Mahivastu, vol. I, pp. 263/265. t) nisbi), n. 642. An abndged translal10n has been given by of BWJhift scriptJlfef from the Cbillese, pp. 284'369. z) ST. SWand SY have Chia,na WI! I have followed 55.

ms.

BEAL,

A

calma

SECTION A

With the distances given by our text and with HstiaD/tsang's description of the holy places at and near Bodh.. Caya, it should not be difficult to identify the emplacement of the tree under which the Buddha practised the six. . years penallce,x> 44. The Shih,shill Hsi"yu,ci!i says that the NiAicll M i!1f (Nairaiijana) river flows to the south into the river Ganges. To the west of the river there IS the tree of the Buddha. The Buddha in this place practised penance, and one day he ate the milk ..gruel. To the west [of the trce] of the six years, there is a dIstance of five li from the city. To the east of the tree upon the stream 15 the place where the Buddha went to bathe. He ascended the bank to the east. and sat under the Ni ..chii..lii ~1 f~ (nyl1grodba) tree. The woman Hsiu ..she flf ~ (Sujata) offered hun the gruel there. Then crossing the stream westwards. to the somh of the tree of the Slx years, he sat under the pei..to tree. He defeated Mara and reached Buddhahood.

m

Also the distances and directions of the Shih/shih Hsi. .yii,chi are new. It is interesting to note that it agrees with the Lalita" vis tara in placing the bathing spot of the Buddha to the east of the theatre of his penances in Uruvela, while Eyhsien places it to the west. 45. Fo,t'u,t'iao says that the Buddha tree was rotten at the cote; put when [the Buddha] arrlved there. it pushed out branches and leaves.

46. Chu Fa...wei says that the ttee of the six years is at five Ii from the Buddha tree. We have written this differently.

In contrast with the two 16 II

Ii of the Wai. .ktlo;,sbib (see § 43).

47. After this, Fa...hsien went to the south-east ba\:k to papliputra.follQwed the river Ganges descending towards tbe west, till he reached a llibifrll caUed

I) The discussion by B. M. BARUA, Cara alld Buddha,Gaya. vol. I. pp. 99,lt8 is not very Illuminating.

4 - L. PanCH. Norther/! India IlIXoraPIg tq the Shuwhmg.chu

L. PETECH

.. Wilderness" (9$[ 1E:f), where the Buddha had resIded AgaIn following the rIVer Ganges and descending towards the west, he reached the city of PoAo,n:\1 vt H {f.; (Benarcs) In the kIngdom of Chla,,~hih llm p (Ka~t).

This is a. quotation from the first sentences of Fa. . hsien's

ch. 34 (LEGGE, pp. 93 / 94). 48. Chu Fa,wel says that the kingdom of Benares IS I2.00 Ii to the south of the kingdom of Chla,wel,\o,wcl (Kapllavastu). Between thern thelC IS the river Ganges, which flows to the south"east. The place whelc the Buddha turned the Wheel of the Law is twenty If to the north of the k1l1gdom. There IS the tree t.allcd Ch'un,,[o\1 'Fr.; it IS the place ofWwmo Mf;

*

m.

The Ganges does not flow between Benares and Kapila. . vasto, and there is probably a confusIon WIth the Gogra. The distan~e and direction of the W Ild...Deer Park, where the Buddha first preached his law, is more exact than in Fa; hsien (see § 49). Sarnath is about kilometers due north of Benares. In Ch·un.lfou, the first character is apparently a mIstake for yen itt. Yenlfou (ancIent 'jvm . .bjJu) is the normal transcrip . . tion of jambll (EtJgenia Jambolana); but I do not think that the world/tree (ja11lbuvrk~a) has anything to do here. Wei1mo (ancient wi. . mua) transcribes *V1ma. It IS difficult to tell who is the personage meant here, but we may suppose that Chu Falwei refers to that man Vimala who, along with other three friend of Yasas, was converted by the Buddha at Be... nares. x) It is noteworthy that in the legend of Yasas a nyagrodha tree pla.ys a great part.~l

6+

*

T) See the Abbmirkrama!l<1surra as translated by BllAL, Tbe romantic legend of Sakya BuJJba, Loodon, 1875. pp. 26w267. Also MALALASEKERA, DlCt;ollmy of Pail Proper Names, vol. II, pp. 6861687. z) BEIAL. 0p. cit., pp. 25 8'266.

[so

J

SECTION A

49. Fa.-hsien says that ten Ii to the north .. east of the CIty there is the wild,deer park. Formerly a Pratyekabuddha resJded there, and there were always some wtld deets who stopped with hun fOl the I11ght; hence the name.

A quotation from Fa;hsien's ch. 34

(LEGGE,

p. 94).

50. After thIs, Fa..hslen again stayed m Paplipl1tI:l. Followmg agalll the river Ganges eastward, on 1tS southern bank there l~ the grc.!t k1l1gdom of Chan_pc a 1~1 ~ (Campa).

These are the first words ofFa;hslen's ch. 37 (LEGGE, p. 100). Campa was the capital of the kingdom of Anga, correspondmg to the modern distrIcts of Bhagalpur and Monghyr. I) Campa has been rightly identified by CUNNINGHAM with the modern hamlet of Champanagar, four miles to the west of Bhagalpur.") 51. The Shlh ..sbib Hsi"ywc/;i say~ that on the bend of the Ganges next to the east there 15 the kmgdom of Campa. To the south of the town [hele IS the pond Pu"ch'wlan fi rl. The nver Ganges is to the north. In this place the Buddha expounded the prOhIbItIOns.

r

The pond near which the Buddha expounded the ten fila. or moral prohibItions for the monks, is called in the Pali texts Gaggara or Gaggara,pokkharar,ti (Skr. ptlfkarilJi, lotus pond), PU.lch'iaAan, ancient pHk,k'ja;!an, is the transcription of a Praknt pukkharatJ7, nearly Identical wIth the Pali form. The Gaggara.lpokkharar,ti may be identified with the large silted, up lake n0'Y' called Sarovar. situated on the skirts of Cham; panagur, from the depth of which Buddhist and Jaina statues were recovered, when partially re,excavated from time to time ",3) C<

~/l4

I) On the role played by Campa In the life of the Buddha see B. C. LAW, Angl' Campa in tbe Hrli literatl/re, In JASB, 1925. pp. 137~r42· 2) Allelellt Gcograp/JY of I1I4ill, pp. S46~547. 3) N. L. DEY, Notes otI anciellt AlIgl1 or tbe "is/ric! of Bhagalpllr, in JASB, 19 14, p. 335·

rsr ]

L. PETECH

I6b

It

52. The river Ganges agam flows through the kmgdom of Po,h is the kingdom of the maternal grandfather of the Buddha.

m: W:i

We have here a case of confusion due to similarity of sounds. Mahamaya. the mother of the Buddha, was the daughter of a lord of the Kaliya, whose dwellings were at a short distance to the east of Kapilavastu. somewhere in what is now Nepalese Tcrai. But the Po"li of the texts is on the lower Ganges, below Campa. The ancient pronounciation was pufi,liei, and this reminds us of the Buli of the Pall texts. whose capital was Allakappa; they dwelt in the modern Muzzaffarpur and 5ha.. habad districts. on both banks of the Ganges. If we accept the identification, then we must assume that this paragraph has been misplaced by Li Tao,yiian, and should be placed before § So. 53. Fa,hsien says that the nver Ganges continues to the east and reaches the kingdom of To'mo-tl-ch'len $ ~ ~ ~f,t) [the capital of] wh1ch IS a sea port.

This is a quotation from Fa. . hsien's ch. 37 (LEGGE, p. IOO). To"'mol'}i. .chtien is Tamraliptl, the great sea port at the mouth of the Hughli. where Fa. .hsien took ship for Ceylon. Ch'ien is of course an eno! for tit which is the correct reading in 55 and Fa,hsien. But the error goes certainly back to Li Taot yuan himself, or even to his source, otherwise there would be no point in the remark which represents § 54. 54.. The 8Mb"iJiiJ Hsi..y,;,c/;i says that Ta,ch'm 1\. ~ is called by anofher name Li-ch'ien -m ~f.

This quotation is of course wholly out of place here. Li Tao.lyiiall was tempted by the wrong reading [Tol'mo.l]li. . ch(ien 1) 5S reads the last character ti {(t.

[ 51<)

SECTION A

into an identification wIth the name Litch'ien or Litkan, occurring in the Han/shu. Li.·kan, which is probably deriv..ed from Alexandria. is geographically synonimous with Ta..ch'in and Fu. . lin and indicates the Hellenistic and Roman Orient. 55. The Fu,nl1n'cbuan of K'ang T'ai says that from south-west of the lsland of Chlamvt'lao one enters a great bay of about 7,800 Ii and arrives at the mouth of the great river Chih,hu,li. Crossing the river and continuing westward. one reaches eventually Ta-ch'ln. He also says that commg out of the port of Chu,h M'1 5fIJ one entClS the great bay. Travellmg straIght to the north,west for more than a year, one reaches the mouth of the river of India, which is called the rIver Ganges. At the mouth of the river there is a kingdom called Tan-mei m;fR: II (Tamralipti). which belongs to India. [Its ruler] sent letters to the Yellow Gate (the Chmcse court), and was appolUted [by Chma] king of Tan-mel.

We have met already with Chia..-na. .t
L. PETtCH:

arc localized on the coast of Ceylon, I) which goes against the indi;, cations of our text. The first alternative IS certamly more credIble. For Chih"hu . . h, a name of the Raptl, mistaken by K 'ang Ta.i for the Ganges, see § 13. Chii..li is Identical wIth T' ou.-chivli f)t fUJ flJ of the Liang; shu and Ptolemy's Takkola; it IS modern Takuapa, on the Siamese west coast of tbe Malayan peninsula. 2 } K'ang T'ai's account of the lower Ganges, read together with Fa;hsien, sheds an interestmg sidelight on the hydrography of 5th century Bengal. The Bhagirathl, which leaves the Gan. . ges a little distance below Gaur, IS one of the water courses con. . tributing to the formation of the Hughh. It is a dying liver now, but It is well.-known that in former times its channel was as important as, and even more important than, the Padma, which now conveys by far the greater part of the Ganges waters to the Megbna estuary.S) For K'ang T'ai the Bhaglrathi is apparently the main channel of the Ganges, since Tamralipti is the port where the Ganges enters the sea. This means that the relative importance of the Bhagirathi and the Padma has been reversed in the last 1500 years. In view of the antiquity of our text (3rd century A. D.), its importance for the history of the Bengal rivers cannot be underestimated. 1) The wording of Ptolemy and of the Jat
.t

SECTION A

If we could determine the precise date of the embassy of Tamralipti to China, it would be an Important result from many points of view. The embassy is mentioned by K'ang"T'ai, who was a subject of the southern Wu dynasty (222/280); thus the embassy would be expected to be addressed to the court of that dynasty in Nanking. But no such embassy IS registered in the annals (pen/eI)i) of the Wu in the Sat/ . . ktlo.-cbih. 56. The Shib,s!nb Hsi'yi/"clli says that the river Ganges Bows to the e;;m and enters the Easteln Sea. Thus it IS that the two rivers wlllch flow, and the two seas which receIve them, arc one each to the east and west

The Shib"sbih Hsi/yiJ/chi means simply that the Indus and the Ganges run into the sea respectlvely to the west and east of the Indian peninsula. The rest of ch. I concerns mainly the K'un/lull.

[55 ]

SECTION B (from ch. 2) The beginning of the chapter describes the unnamed river which issues from the Ts(ungAing mountalnS and empties it. . self into the Lei ...chu sea, i. e. the AmI. Then it goes on to say: 2a

a

57. The Shth . .shih Hst,yivch, says that the I,1o,eh'l'u ~R ~~ ~m river Jssues from the north,western slde of the Amoll,fa and Rows in the lungdom of Yii,den =f r~l (Khotan)

This I ...lo...ch'i. . ti presents a serious problem. Its ancient pronounciation was ngiei....za. .g'ji~diei; there is no Sanskrit or Prakrit name of river which may be recalled by this. It flows from Central Himalaya to Khotan (§ 57), north of KapiSi and Gandhara (§§ 59,60,65) and empties itself into the Lei. . chu or Aral sea (§ 65). This nver seems to have been pieced together with bits of information concerning at least two river systems: the Khotan. . darya and the Arnu . . darya. Besides, Li Tao/yuan seems to connect it somehow with the Ghorband . . Panjshir.. Kabul system. No simIlar piece of hydrography has yet been pointed out from Buddhistic sources; it stands wholly isolated. 58. The chapter 011 the Westan Countrles in the H~II.shtl says that west of Khotan all the rivers flow westward and go to the Western sea.

The passage referred to is Hanlshtl, ch. 96 a,

£ 8 a.

t(l

the

L. PETECa:

2b

59. Then It flows westward to the north of the four peat stiipas. What fa,hsten calh the klllgdom of Chiu"'shlh,lo ? %~ (Tak~asila), means III Chinese ('l~.o" severed head" (iii lIN). When the Buadha was a Bodhisattva, he gave away hIS head to a man, and thiS fact gave the name to the kingdom To the east of the kingdom [of Gandhara] IS the place whcle he offered hlmself as food for a hungry tiger In all these places stu pas have been bUlk

*L

Except for the first sentence, the whole paragraph 1S a qUQ~ tation of tbe first part of Fa"hsien's ch. II (LEGCE, p. 32). On the " gift of the head" see the bibhography quoted in LAMOTTE, Le traite de la grande vertu de sagesse, p. 144 n. The place where the Buddha offered himself to the tIger is 011 mount Banj, not far from the Mahaban spur in south~eastern Buner. I) On the legend see the bibliography in LAMOTTE, op. Clt., p' I43 n.

iJ

~

60. It /lows further westward, to the north of the kmgdom of Chien't'o,wel This IS the city which was governed by Fa,i 'l-:k ~

1st: ~!.tr (Gandhara).

(DharmaV1vatdhalla), the son of king Asoka When the Buddha was a Bodhtsattva, lu this kingdom he also gave his eyes away to a man It thiS place too a great stu pa has been buIlt.

Except for the first sentence, the whole paragraph is a quol cation ofFa...hsien's ch. IO (LEGGE, pp. 3V3Z). Chien ..t'o . .wei is Fa~hsien's usual name for Gandhiira. We may recall that Chien,t'o/wei, ancient ljvn"d'i/"jilVai, transcribes a Prakrit form *Gandhavai, derived from an earher *Gandha. . vacH. corresponding to Sanskrit Gandhavati.")

In the times of Fa"hsien the capital of Gandhara was still Pu~alavati (modern Charsadda), although it was fast being 1) A. STEIN. ltl ASIAR Frontier Circle, 1904"5, pp. 33'45. For an inscription there see StmI Kmww, Corp. 111M. Ind., vol. II, I, pp 55"'57. 1) See e. g. PnuoT, Let MlIlJ' prapm dw Milindapl1fi/JI1, p. 393 II.

SECTION B

superseded by its younger rival Puru~apura (Peshawar). The pilgrim was wrong in localizing there the legend of Asoka's son Dharmavivardhana or Kunala, the scene of which was in Taxila, as related at length in the Afokavadana. r) The stOpa of the" gift of the eyes" near Pu~karavati was visited also by Hstian.. tsang.~) On the legend see the biblio. . graphy cited by LAMOTTE, op. cit., p. 144 n. , 61. Agam thete IS the kingdom of Fu.-Iou.-sha ~I} f!4 ¥'V (Purll!apura}, Sakra, king of the gods. took the shape of a little herd/boy and 5Llaped together some earth in the shape of d. stiipa of the Buddha The DharmaraJa [saw It and] therefole [bUlltJ a gteat stiipa. [These are] what are called the Four Great Stfipas

This paragraph is an abridgement of Fa.. hsien's ch. (LEGGE, lW· 33'34)·

12

62. The FaliJsien"huan says etc. [omitted]

There follows a quotation flOm Fa..hsien's ch. 12 (LEGGE, pp. 34"'35), giving the legend of the alms ..bowl of the Buddha and its miraculous powers. 3a

63. FOlt'u.-t'iao says that the bowl of the Buddha is nude of green pdc, It Can talUs more than three bushe!l (~f-). This kmgdol1l holds jt as sacred At the time of the offenngs, If they desire that [the bowl] ll1ay not become full WIth the scented flowers of d. whole day's [offermg. It happens] a~ they have said; alld If they deSire that It may be filled With a handfll!, it also [happens] at once as they have said.

A sim.ilar legend in Fa.. l1S1en's eh.

I2

(LEGCE. p. 36).

I) PRZ;YLUSKt, La /egf/lde de l'empcreul' Afdka. pp 281'294. B.siiawtsang diilnot make the same mistake and localizes the legend in Taxila; WATrliR~, yoU. pp. 2,W.l4(i· 2) WAT'l'ERS. vol. I, p. 2I5.

L. PETECH

*

64. Also according to what the monk Chu Fa,wei says, the bowl of the Buddha is in the kingdom of the Great Yuch;chih Jj X. They have built a stopa 30 cbollg ~ high, wIth seven storeys. The place of the bowl is in the second storey; there IS a golden nct, and the net covers all around the howl. The bowl is of green stone. He also says that the bowl Roats 111 the space, to wait 3 b ull rthe Buddha] will place the bowl on a golden tablet. A mark of one foot of the Buddha is together With the bowl in the same place. The king, the nobles and the people, all of them holding Brahma,perfume, the seven kInds of jewels and jade, make offerings to the slupa and the footprint. The tooth of the Buddha, the rohe, tbe 11{(/'!I1. all these relics are certainly in the kIngdom of Fu;lou;sha.

On this paragraph, and generally on the alms,;bowl of the Buddha (for which cfr. also § 9), see eHAV ANNES, Voyage de Song YUH, p. 433, and S. L.EVI, Notes chinoises sur tIHde, V, in

BEFEO. V (1905), pp. 290/299. According to Hsualvtsang the ruined 'stupa of the bowl was inside Peshawar, in the north,;eastern part of the town; 1) the place has never been identified, much less excavated. The relics mentioned in the last sentence of our text were all of them preserved at Nagarahara (modern Jalalabad) and in its neighbourhood. 2l Fa. . wei seems to imply that in his time Nagarahara ,was a part of the kingdom of Puru~apura. The kingdom of the Ta Yueh,;chih is the state of the Kidaras, the last epigons of the Kushan, who lasted till the middle of the 4th century. 65. 'The Sbtb4bib Hs''"yii-chi says that to the north-west of the royal capital of ChieM
r) WAt'rl!tlS, vol.

r. p. .202.

~) See Fa,IWcu's ch. 13. and CHAVANNllS. VOYl\!e de SOlJg Yml. PP' 428'429.

{60 ]

SECTION B

po. .t'u. .lo. . yueh, ancient puaM'uo"Z81r iii, is the name of the royal city of the robe (Nagarahara); for the moment it seems impossible to reconstruct the Indian origma1. 1) The following text is not very clear and is perhaps fragmentary. It is impossible to identify the unnamed monastery, and it is noc even clear whether it is east of Nagarahara or of Peshawar (or Pu" ~kalavatl~). Then again some words are certainly missing, because we are suddenly transported in Upper Swat, and there is no trace ofthe locality from which the ten li northlwestward arc calculated. HoCi'nl}pu . .lo is an error for A(lffi]}·pu/lo, ancient ·61 b
L. PE'tECH

breath the pool and the rock on which the Buddha dried his robe (for which see back § 9); and the Shih"shih Hsi"yu"chi, which is perhaps even earlier, definitely says that rock and pool are in one and the same place. We must conclude therefore that in the 4th and 5th centunes the pond was localized, like the rock, about four miles below Tirat. In the two centu . . ties intervening till the journey of Hsuan/tsang the legend shifted up river as £'u as the confluence of the Vtrot and Vshu streams. 66. TIllS rIver runs toward, An,hsi (Aral) sea. It

*

,frl. (Persia)

to the Lcvchu '~: tJ; 10 tbe

also saId that to the west of Chlen,t'o,yueh (Gandhara) nuddlc oftbe Western Sea there 15 the klI1gdom of An,hsl. IS

This too is a quotatlOn from the Shih"shih HsilyiJ1chi. The rest of the course of the 1. .10. .ch (i. .(1 refers clearly to the Oxus. The unknown monk who compiled the Shihlshih Hsi"yiilChi Seems to have very hazy idea about the Farthest West. He connects the Caspian Sea with the PerSlan Gulf and perhaps even with the Mediterranean and Black Sea, to form one great ocean s~rrounding Iran. 67. The FwnnMiJl of Chu Chlh says that from the kmgdom of An,hsl to the kingdom. of S'iu,ho-t'tao there are .zo.ooo Ii; the land of thIS klllgdom borders with the sea. They are therefore the T'ieo/chu(Illdia) alldAn~hsl klllgdoms ofthe HaUtShu.

For Ssti. . ho.lttiao see the note to § 30 (a). The FtI"l1an.-chi refers here to information gathered in Fu. .nan. It seems that we have here an echo of that sea route from the mouth of the Euphrates"Tigris to Hormuz and along the coast of Western India to Ceylon, which was so active and so frequented during the palmy days of the Ro" m
APPENDIX CHI... PIN Chi... pin is one of the most famous but also most puzzling terms of the Chinese geography of north"western India. For a long t1me its most current interpretation has been that propounded by Chavannes and S. Levi about half a century ago. CHAVANNES expressed it in the following words: "From the period of the Han to that of the Northern Wei, the name Chi...pin applies only and always to KashmIr, as proved in several ways by the travels of the Buddhist pilgrims. It is only in the rang period that the name Chi"'pm is rather unhappily connected with the name KapiSi, and serves henceforward to indicate this last country". I) This theory was soon challenged for the period of the Former Han, but many scholars still accept it with more or less conviction.::!} Chi. .pin appears for the first time in the Chinese texts in the notice dedicated to it by the HandJtl, ch. 96 a, ff. 10 a I I3 a,S} which refers to conditions prevailing in the first century B. C. r) CHAVANNES, Les pays d'o,cident d'apr~s le Wei,lio, 111 TP, VI (190S). p. 538 n. 2) A good resume of the views of Chavannes, S. Levi and Pelho! on this subject has been given by P. C. EAGeRr, Ki,p;', ana Knsbmir, In Sino,Indian Stllrfies, II (rg4
pp. 42 '53. 3) The best translation, in spite of the awful transcnption system employed, IS still that of DE GROO'!', ChillcsisciJe Urkullden ZJlr Gmbicbte Asiens, vol. II: Die Westlande CiJinns ill dey vorchristhcbm Zeit, Berlin, I92(1, pp. 86-91.

L. PETECH

and beginning of the fiI:st century A. D. Its geographical posi" tion is determined by the following data: Nan,;tou (Dardistan) is 9 days or 330 Ii to the north1east; the Great Yueh1chih (at that time having their seats in Bactriana) are to the nonh"west (north accoI:ding to ch. 96 a, £ I4 b); Wu...i...shanlli (Arachosia) is to the south"west. Then follows an interesting historical account, which has not yet been interpreted with certainty. I) I think it IS now pretty well agreed that the Chi. . pin of the Hal11s/Ju was a large but lU"defined area in the north...west, cor. . responding at first to the realm of the Sakas in India (founded probably at the end of the 2nd century B. C.), and comprising Gandhara, Kapisi, parts of Western Panjab. but probably excluding Kashmir; it was thus practically co)extensive with the ancient Candhara satrapy of Achaemenid administration. The demonstration has been made several times, by sinologists, ira,; nists and indologists, and I am not going to repeat it here.~) In any case Chi1pin, already at its first appearance on the stage of history, seems to be more a political than a geographical term. The origin of the name Chi1pin has not been much discussed. It is usually assumed that Chi"'pin, ancient kiiii"pjen, archaic kjad, p~en. transcribes a form *Kasplra, not occurring in Indian texts, but known from such transcriptions as Ptolemy's KaspelIaioi and 1) TARN, The Grub in Baetria and Illatll, Cambridge. 1938, Pl'. 340;343 had followed v. Gutscbmid in applying this account to the Greeks 1n India CWu' t'ou;!ao I1tfelphotl. Ym.. mo,fu = Herm..'1ios); but the equations are phonetlcaI1y untenable. See ALTIlElM. WeltgmhiclJte hims im griechifCbm Zeitillter, vol. II. Halle,

=

Pl'· JZ3'U5· 2) FRANKE, Beitriige etc., p. 59: STBN KONOW, Corp. Inm. lila.• 1M, Pl'. xxiii, xxv; l-l.tiRzFELn. Sakastan (Arch. Mm. am Iran IV), 1932, Pl'. 21, 31"32; TARN. The Gmks in Bactr/Il and I/ldia, Pl" 339"343, 469/473; now also VAN LOHUIZEN..DE Lmmw, The "Scythian Ptmd", Leiden, 1949, Pl'. 370"373. For the Gandhara sa, nap)" whkh was enormously larger than historical Candhara. see FOUCHER, La vieille rrmtt it ('1/141' it &ctm a Taxila (MDAFA I). Paris, 1942-1947. p. 193 1948,

APPENDIX

Kaspeira. *KaspIra would be another form for a Prakrit *Kas>' vIra, which now survives in the Kashmiri vernacular form KaSir. II There are several objections that may be advanced against this theory. First of all, chi was normally used for transcribing a sound ka;~) we miss any trace of a representation ofehe sibilant. which plays such an important part in the series *Ka.spira>' Kasvlra..-Kaslr. Another element must also be taken in ac'" count. The Candragarbha;,siitra is a text originated in Central Asia (Khotan), where some fragments of the original have come to light. g) Its Chinese translation by Narendrayasas (d. 596) supplies us with the form Chl;,pin"na Jffl i( 7}\VI Now, Narendrayasas was born in U q,q,iyana and the text he translated was of Khotanese origin. It is most probable that his Chi" pin. . na reproduces a pronounciation current on both sides ·of the Pamir; or else he WIshed to restore the final vowel >'a, led by the same tendency towards Sanskritic purism which later led Hsuan..-tsang and I..-ching to employe. g. such a form as Wu..-ch'angma in the place of Wu,"ch'ang hitherto used for U 99iyana. In both cases, the form Chi..-pin.;na means that Narendrayasas was conscious that the final nasal of Chupin did not transcribe an .;r, as required if the anginal were Kasmir4,

*

I) A. STEIN, Kalhana's Riijatarangin1. Westminster, 1900, vol. n. p. 386. The demonstration of the phoncacal identity Chi'pm = Kashmir was first attempted by s. LtVI and CiIAVANNES in their study on Chi'pin In J. As., 189S lX , Pl? )71;3 84. It is only fair to point out that such an authority as the late Professor P]!l.LIO! was also convinced of the ,Identity; Tokharim et KoutclJeCIJ. in J. As., 1934 x, 1'. ~9 iI. 2) Fathsien uses it for the first syllable of the name Klll1.lujl see back § 25. Kum.1; raJiva (d. 409'13) 1n his translation of the Sutriilamkiilo used! for transcribing che first syllable ofKani~ka; LEVI, Notes!lfr les Ind",Scythes, in J. As., I&!l6 u , p. 452. 3) HOIlRNLE, Mtlnlucript Remaitu oj Buddhist Litem/lire fe/illd ill Earttrtl Tlltkettall, Oxford. t916, voL I, pp. r03'108. 4) Taisho. vol. XIII, p. 367 b, See LEvI, Notes chinoim SIIY tIm/e, V. in BEFEO. V ("(905), pp. 26r_263. 285; and PELtIOT, in BEFEO. V, P.45+

5 - L. PE'reCH, Narth~rn

India according 10 the Shw.-chlnt-chu

L. FETEeH

but an "n; the underlying anginal was therefore something like *KapIl)a,x) As a geographical term. such a word is not to be found in Indian literature; it is, instead. well known as a personal name. I refer to king Maha. .Kapphi1).a or Maha. . Kappil),a, the hero of a whole cycle of legends In Pali and Sanskrit. He is represented as ruling in Kukku{avati, a frontier region, and this legend is definitely localized in the extreme north . .west of India. as he is stated to have met the Buddha on the banks of the Candrabhaga (Chcnab) river. a) The Vinaya of the MUI lasarvastivadins gives a variant of the same legend; Kapphil),a is a Brahman, who meets the Buddha during the latter's journey to the nOlth. .west. 3) King Kappiq.a and Chi/pin are both remains of a piece of ancient lore concerning some region in Upper India. It may be that further research in this directIOn will yield more definite results, but already now I think that a I) By his Chi'pm,na, Narendrayaias meant undoubtedly Kashmir. ThiS IS rendmd certain by the name of the Naga Hou,lo;ch'a B~ fi~, which appears m tbe text as one of the protecting deitles of Chl/pmma. Hou,lo/ch'a, anCient Y2t111n, {'If, transcribes *Hulada. and thiS is dearly Idenucal WIth Holada, which occurs 111 the Rajawaitgitl'i as the name of the dlstflct around the Wular lake ll1 Kashmir; STEIN, KPIIJ(/nls Ritj<1larailgini, vol. II. P 460. It is tIUe that in the Nilamata (cd. De Vreese, Leiden, 1936, Index) and in the RiiJatarangMi the Naga of the lake 1$ never called Holada or anything like, but always Mahapadma. However, the phone(:1c eqUIvalence Hou, tOlCh'a , Hola4a: ... Wular, which was first tentatively suggested by F W. THOMAS (Tibetan Literary Texts .md Damments concerning Chillese Turkestan, vol. I. London, (935. p. l07 n), is beyond doubt. But here I am concerned only with the origin of the word Chi'pin, not with Its meaning for a BuddhIst translator of the 6th century. z) MALALASEKlIRA, Dictiotrary of FilII proper nallles, London, 1937'S, voL II, PP.473' 475· A possible connectlon with Chi-pin was already suggested by GAuRniANKAR, KapphilJiibbyutfaya of KaJmirabha!{a Siv4svamin (PenFb University pubblicatlons n. 26), Lahore. 1937. pp. xl,xlii. BAILEY, Irano,Illdica III, In BSOAS XIII (1950), p. 395. propO$I1$ to connect I
APPENDIX

case has been made out for entirely dissociating the group Chi. . pin . . Chi. . pin. .na ... KappiQ.a from * Kaspira. Though this is not strictly relevant to my subject, I shall briefly discuss the opinion of FOUCHER on the data of the Greek authors that are usually put in relatIon WIth Chi. .pin and Kashmir. He maintains that Kaspapyros of Hecataclls (fr. l7 8), Kaspatyros of Herodotus (IV, 44) and the Kaspeiraioi of PtOI lemy (VII, I, 47) have nothing to do with Kashmir, but refer to Multan; one of the ancient names of thIS town was Kasyal papura,I) and Kaspapyros (for which Kaspatyros is evidently an error) transcrIbes *Kassapapura, while Kaspeiraioi is *Kasl sapa(p)urlya.:a) But how about the geographical facts ~ Kaspa . . pyros is the place where Skylax of Karyanda, sent by king Darius I to explore India, took ship to descend the river to the sea; and since it was in the land Paktyike (according to Herodotus) or in Gandhara (according to Hecataeus), it is f.1.r more obvious to look for It in the neighbourhood of Attock, or perhaps at Peshawar itsel(3) With Kaspeiraioi and cognate forms, things are still less satisfactory. First, I do not see any cogent reason why we should identify them with Kaspatyros. 1) Utpala's commentary to the BrblltsamlJita ofVar5;hanuhi(a is lIsually quoted, as authority for this. But the passage lD question is not found in the extant rext of Utpala; It IS known only through a quotation. in al,Beriini; SACHAU, Albmmi'r Inaia, London, 1910, vol. I, p . .298. Other tradltiol1s connecting the famous sage and solar deity KaSyapa wIth Multan have been collected by CUNNINGHAM, AI/e/ellt Ge~frdPby oj India, p . .267; but it is hIghly suspicious that tip to now nobody hilS bem able to cite .a. sil1,gle orlg1l1,al text as eVIdence. 2) FOUCHER,Lc, satrllpics orielltales de {'empire (((MII/nMe, in Comples RenaUf, AcaablJie des Inmiptiolls et Belles Lettrer, 1938, pp. 347'348, La viti/if rOllle de l'Illde, Pl'. 194d 99. 3) See c. g. HERZFELD, COIllae!s betweell tbe Olt{ Irilllwn Empire tllld India, 10 India Alltiqua. Leiden, 1947, Pi' 18.;1'183; KRAMERS, PesIJdwar, in A/III. Bibl. 111.1. Arch.• XV (for 1940'1947), Pl" XVIII and XXI. R. C. MAJUMDAR, A,haemeniall Rul(.illl~dkl, in IHQ, XXV (1949), pp. 159,x60, warttS to locate Kaspatyros at Schwan 111, SlOd, which IS certainly too far down the rlver..

L. PBTECH

In the second place, Foucher himself remarked that perhaps we must avoid confusing Kasperia, Kaspiria or Kaspireia of Ptolemy's § 42 wlth Kaspeira of § 49, which is placed at a much lower latitude. The first would be Kashmir, the second Muhan. l ) This is pOSSibly correct; but in any case we have po.! sitive evidence of the phonetical equivalence of Kasperia. .Kaspll ria with Kashmir. It comes from Central Asia. We have the early Khotanese form Kaspar,-,2) reproduced as Kas/par in the Tibetan translation of the Vimalaprabha..pariprccha.3) Then there is the Parthian form Qspyr, found in a sort of catalogue of the Yaksa on an amulet of the 4th/6th centuries. 4 ) Both forms, referring with certamty to Kashmir, are unmIstakably identical with Ka.speria and Kaspiria; Muhan is here out of question. The conclusion of the above discussion is that we have on the one side Chi/pin(ma) and Kapp(h)iQ.a, unconnected with Kasmira; and on the other side Kasperia, Kaspar,-, Qspyr,

*KaspIra, *Kasvira, Kasir. Coming again to our Chinese texts, the next mention of Chi1pin is found in the Hou Hatt;shu and refers to conditions in the second half of the first and first half of the second centuries A. D. The text is very meagre: (( Starting from pel/shan,. when one travels towards the south/west, he passes through Wu;hao '~J~' crosses the Hanging Passages, passes through Chi"'pin, and at the end of more than sixty days' march arrives I) f'ouonrn, La vieille route de !'11111e. p. 252 H. z) LlltlMANN, Dill l/oraariscfJe (sakiscbe) Le/Jrgeiiic/Jt aes BuJr1bislllllS (Abh. f. d. K\lUde d. Marg. XX), uipzig, 1933;1936. ch. XXIV, v. 5 (p. 291), See also the revj$ed tran.~lation. of the pass.lge concerning Kaspar. . by S'I'EN KONOW, On Pro, fmcr LelltIUI/ln's /lew SlIkll rext, in Norsk Ttdsskrift for Spragvidenskap. XI (r939), Pl'. ),8...;!0. 3) 1'aOlYtA$, Tibetan Literary Texts etc., vol. I, p. 193. 4) Hmm'lNG. TUlo Mlllicuaellfl magiCl1I. texts, in BSOAS, Xli (1947). pp, 55'5 6. [ 68]

APPENDIX

in the kingdom of WUli"shan"h",I) WUlhao is identical with WU1ch(a (*Uqa) of the Shui1cbing/chu, in the Pamirs. "The route leads thence through the Hanging Passages on the Indus and through Chi1pin to Arachosia, i. e. roughly to the region of Kandahar. From Gilgit to Kandahar the logical route is along the Indus or (in order to avoid its impassable gorges) through Swat to the Peshawar plains (Gandhara) and thence to Kandahar via Jalalabad. . Kabul or via the Zhob. A del tour through the Kashmir valley is much less probable. Chi. . pin may correspond here to Gandhara and may extend to cover Kapisi as well, with which political relations were most close. Kashmir is out of the question. Then we have the statement, 111teresting from the historical point of view, that KuzuIa Kadphises « conquered An. .hsi (Par.thia) and Kao . .fu (Kabul). Then he subjugated Pu;ta if~ ~ " and Chi1pin ".~) Pu"ta, ancient b'uok. . d'at, IS perhaps the Pak... tyike of the Greek authors, s) somewhere in Central Afghani.. stan. Chi"pin, the first conquest of the Kushan in India proper, must here correspond roughly to Gandhara and West Panjab; Taxila was certainly included in it, as we know that Kuzula Kadphises succeeded there the Parthian dynasty of Gondophares. Another mention of Chi"pin 111 the Hawshu is in connection with Kao . .fu. This country (modern Kabul) was then seldom independent 4) and belonged in turn to T'ien. . chu· (India), I) HOll Han,shu, eh. !IS, £ II (/,b. CHAVANNES, Les pays: d'ocddent a'apr(s Ie Reou HaMboll, in TP, VIn (1907), p. 175. 2) Hall Han,shll, eh. lIS. f. IS h. CHAVANNllS, op. CIt., pp. I9111923) FRANKE, Beitriige etc., p. 99. 4) It should be kept 10 mind that Kabul 2000 years ago bad not by far the same 1mportance as today, but was left far behlOd, both from the political
L. PErEeR

Chi/pin and An. . hsi (Parthia), according to which of these kingdoms was stronger. z) Conditions here described refer to the time prior to the Kushan conquest, because only a few lines before It has been told how Kuzula Kadphlses had conquered Kao/fu and Chi"'pin.2 ) I take the enumeration to be 1n chio. . nological order; rien . . cI1U refers to the rule of Indian kmgs (the Mauryas. and then the line of Sophagasenos, during the whole of the 3rd century B. C.). Chi. . pin may mean here Maues's Saka state in the Panjab, whlch; however, seems not to have extended (except perhaps as a suzerain power) to Kapisa . .Kabul; or else, more probably, it refers to the rule of the Gleek kings. An. .hsi is probably not Parthia proper, but the Indo. . Parthian kingdom of Gondophares, to whom Kapis! belonged in the first years of our era. Agam, Kashmir has nothing to do with this. On the whole, I would say that in the Hou Han . .shu Chi. . pin represents the region of the Nortb...Western frontier dominated in turn by the Greek, the Saka, the Parthians and the Kushan. Since Kani~ka, It included also Kashmir. The texts discussed up to now belong to the official, Confucial nist, historiography. But starting from the Later Han dynasty, i. e. the period covered by the Hou Handm, we have to turn our attention also to another tradition, in which Chi. .pin has quite anal ther meaning: that of the translatIOns of the Chinese Tripiraka. They are wholly independent in style, origin and outlook from the official historiography, and the two traditions run for cel1turies p~al1el to each other, and to a great extent ignoring each other. For practical purposes we can assume that the work of translating Inruan Buddhist texts into Chinese started in the 1) ROIl

Rall<>shu, ch. lI8, ff. IS b,r6 a; CRAVANNES, op. cit., p. I92.

2} CHAVANNES,

loe

CIC.

APPlllljDIlt

2nd century A. D. The translators at first were, for the greater part, men from Greater Indja (Central Asia and Indochina); these foreigners had to stlUggle with the difficulty of adapting the stock of geographical names already possessed by the Chinese to the nomenclature of the Sansknt original. Also the name Chi. . pin was subjected to this adaptation, and the result was peculiar. In the 2nd century Chi. .pin practically meant the Indian dominions of the Kushan. Its political centre was Gandhiira, but its religious centre was Kashmir; it is there that later accounts place the so . . called council of Kani~ka; it was 111 Kashmir that a good deal of the texts of Mahayana was elabo. . rated. It was therefore guite natural if the rather vague term Chi. . pin of the annals was applied by the translators to that coun. . try included in the realm of Chi"'pin, which was most important for them: Kashmir. 'This was also helped by the l~embhnce of Chi. . pin to the Prakrit form *Kaspir (Kashmir), although, as shown above, the two words were originally quite independent of each other. We may even suppose that in the 2nd century A. D. the name *Kaspir was popularly extended to the whole of the Indian dominions of tbe Kusban, as the Kaspeiraioi of Ptolemy seems to imply and as it has indeed been suggested by S. LEVI/) In any case, it is an establIshed fact that the WOld Chi~pin in the early translations of the Chinese Tnpi~aka is normally employed for Sansknt Kasmira; 2) this can be checked wherever I) Le catalogtle des Yakfa dam la Ma/Jiimiiyuri. p. 91, • 2.) There is one exceptlon. Kumarajiva in his translations of the Slitriilamkilra and of the Mabiiprajt7apiiramitiifcistra (both made abollt 4D2~40S) applies the name Chupin

to Kiipisl; LEVI, Afvag!;0Fa, Ie S"triilaJnkiira et ses versions, In J. As .• IS/OS u , pr· 8r..sli traite de /(1 grancf~ tlfrtlf de sagesse. pp. 542 and 550 II. The fact IS now w(~l established, notwIthstandmg the doubts expressed by PELLIO:r III BEFEO. IX (1909), p.168. It shows that even ill the Buddhi~t tr;tdiuon the equation chL-pin = hh!ll.U" was not absolutely without exceptions. LAMOTTE, Le

L. PEl'ECH

the Sanskrit original has been preserved. The Chinese pil.I •grims too followed at first the lead gIven by the sacred texts they had studied before leaving home; it is beyond doubt that in theit accounts Chi/pin is, and cannot be anything else but, Kashmir. 1) This lasted till Hstian/tsang introduced the learned spelling Chia/ssu1millo, based directly on the Sanskrit Kasmira. I must, however, stress a pomt which is often lost sight o£ Modern scholars are sometimes apt to think unconsciously of Kashmir in the shape as it appears on our maps. Modern Jam. . mu and Kashmir state is a creation of the British, and its birth date is the treaty of Amritsar in 1846. Historical Kashmir has all ways included only and alone the valley of Kashmir and the inner slopes of the ring of mountains that surround it; 2) we except of course the campaigns of conquest of Kashmiri kings towards the plams. The whole of the Indus valley, and mainly the commer. . dally important Gilgit area, although occasionally invaded by the kings of Kashmir and although always open to the cultural influence ofthe valley, was never an integrant part of the kingdom. Moreover, if Kashmir lies on one of the easiest routes from Central Asia to Eastern Panjab and the Ganges valley, it emphatically does not represent a convenient or logical passage from Central Asia to the centres of Gandhara culture in Eastern Afghanistan and the NorthlWestern Frontier Province. The normal route in this case was not that through Kashmir, nor even the direct but terribly difficult track along the Indus, but the once very frequented trails through Gilgit and then Chittal (for Kapisl) or Swat (for Candhata). This simple geographical fact must be kept present jf one is to avoid drawing wrong conclusions from historical data. t) 1'ht relevant materials are conveniently gathered ill BAGCHI, Kilpill and Kashmir, Pl?· 47'"sr· z) STmN, Ki/Jb.ma'S' RajatartlflgM, vol. II, p. 387.

APPENDIX

To give an example, it has been infened from the inscription ofWima Kadphises at Khalatse in Ladakh that this ruler held sway over Kashmir.') But the centre of the power of the early Kushan kings was in Gandhara and Western Afghanistan. from which regions Khalatse would be reached by routes more direct if not easier than through KashmIr. It may be that Kashmir belonged to Wima Kadphises, but we cannot use the Khalatse inscription for proving it; beyond this, there is absolutely no other evidence to support the contention, and the arguments ex. . silentio are rather against It. 2 ) If, therefore, we accept the equivalence Chi. .pin = Kashmir for the Chinese Buddhist literature from the 2nd to the early 7th century, it must be understood that we mean Kasmira in its strictest sense, i. e. the upper valley of the Jhe1am. As pointed out above, Buddhist tradition and Confucianist historiography for a long time ran on parallel lines without much reciptocal influence. After the HOIf HanIsh/I, the next mention of Chi. . pin in the dynastic histories is found in the Wei. . liieb (3rd century A. D.), which barely mentions the route leading from the regions subject to Khotan towards Chl"'pin, Ta. .hsia (Bactriana), Kao . .fu (Kabul) and T'ien..-chu (India), « which are all subject to the yueh. . chih ".9) We have no particulars about it, and this short mention does not allow any conclusion. 1) CHIRSHMAN. Begratn. Cairo, 19+6, p. 142. I think Chirshman has given to Kashmir undue politIcal weight in Kushan history, even jf he IS perfectly rIght aboot Its cultural and religious importance. We must llot forget that a valley hidden away in the mtdst of the mountaInS may for a moment become, but canllot remain fo~ any length of time the centre of an empIre. To shut themselves away in the fair but seclud, ed vale of Kashrrur, meant for [he Kushan rulers c\ltdng thenuelves deliberately away' from easy communications with the rest of their dominIons, especially with Bactriana. .2) BOYER, r: IJIscr/ptiotl ell Kbaro!!bi du 15 A,a@Ja. 136. in J. As. 19I 5. p.1.83. ~) Ap. Sall,kuo-cbih, ch. 30, f. 32 aj CHAVANNBS, LeI pay! d'oc(irle/lt d'apre.t Ie Wti.. UII, p. 538; DE GROOT, Die Westlal1ae Chinas, P.48.

L. PETECH

Then comes a gap of two centuries. China broke up in two halves, of which the southern had 110 direct access to Central Asia. and the northern was torn by unending wars between ephemeral dynasties claimmg the imperial title but rulmg for short periods only and on small parts of the country. Political intercourse with the West ceased. For the whole of the Chin period (265/420) we have only a short passage of Kuo I,;kung's Kt/an<.~/chjh, found in the commentary of Yen Shih . .ku ~ ~ifj -iii (581,1645) to Hatltshtl, ch. 96 a, £ I I a, but omitted in Ma Kuo . . han's collection of the fragments of the Kuang1chib. It says: " The large dogs of Chi"'pm are as big as donkeys and of led colour. From a distance of various li [the natives] use to shake tamburins in order to call them". It was not until Northern China had been unified by the Wei dynasty (386,;534), that something like order returned and relations were resumed. But only m the last years of the dynasty, when the capital had been transferred from rai ill northern Shansi to the classical Loyang (494), embassies from the states of northtwestern India found theIr way agam to the imperial court. From these embassies the Chinese heard new names for old countries, names which rendered obsolete their claSSlcal geography of the Han times. The following table shows these embassies, as they are listed in the annals (pen~chj) of the Wei;shlJ echo 8 and 9): Chi~pin

...... .

Chia.-pi. .sha iJJIIl:t 1:9 . Pu . .1iu1 sha ;r, inc. ¥~ . Kan..ta fl ~ . . . Chia...shih. .mi 1hn ill!

.

*j . .

45 r, 502, 508 , 5 I7

...

50 3 5 II SII

5I I

APPENDlX

Chia/pi. .sha, ancient g'ja"pji'fa, is Kapisa; Pu,.liu. . sha, ancient .. is Puru~apura (Peshawar); Kan,.ta. ancient kan1d
pi~uAi~u"'fa.

I) See also PELLlOT, Tokbarietl et Koutcblw, pp. 43-44. On this state see GruRSHMAN, Let Chionites,Hepbtbalitn, pp. I04'I14. There was al~other Hephthalite kingdom. that of Bactriana. well known becau~t of its long wars with Sassantd Persia. 2)

L. PETECH

"chat he wrote from the Buddhist point of view and that the Buddhist tradition for the first time could exert a re~l and deep influence on a text of the dynastic histories. We have in the Peilsbih (ch. 97, £ 25 alb) an account of Gandhara which is drawn from Sung Yil11. Even the name is in the form given by Sung Yun (Kantt'o ~llJt) .and not in that of the embassy

of SII. There is also an account of Chitpin (ch. 97. £ 22 a), which says: ~(The capital of Chitpin is the clty of Shantchien ~{f:. ~. It is to the southtwest of P'o . . lu itk: &tf (Bolor). It IS at I4.000 Ii from T'ai (the Wei capital in northern Shansl). It lies 111 the midst of four mountains. This country measures 800 li from west to east and 300 ltfrom south to north ". The rest of the text merely reproduces the corresponding passage of the Hanl shu. The sentences translated above. which are the only inde. . peadent part of the text, are too short to afford any useful infor. . matlon. About the name Shan. . chien, we can hazard a guess. In the texts of the Chinese Tripitaka, shan . . chien Cgood . . look1l1g") is normally employed to translate the Sanskrit sudarlana. l ) Su . . darsana is one of the names bf the celestial capital of Indra and of the thirty,three gods.'1l Now a town called Indrapura, .. city of Indra". is mentioned in the Mahamayuri,3) between such localities as SlVapura. . ahara (Sheva east of Shahbazgarhl) and Vat1;m (Bunet).4) Although it must remain at present

1) Shan-chlcn is never used for Srinagara, as maintained by BAGCHI, K;'pin and Kasbmir, p. 46. . 2) See e. g. the DivYdvdadllll, ed. Cowell & Nedl, Cambrtdge, 1886, pp. 217•.uS, 220, ;tll.

l) UVl) Lt co/aloglle des Yak,a, pp 37'38. 4) On Sivapura see J. N. BANNERJ£A. ldentpeatioll of sOllie Audet!t Irrdial1 place 1111111($, in IHQ, XIV (!~ns}, Pl" 7501750 ••

APPENDIX

unidentIfied, I) it seems clear to me that Indra.pUl'a and SudarSana) are one and the same town. As rightly pointed out by J. N. Ban; nerjea, "numerous instances can be quoted in which the same locality is descnbed under various names whlch are synonimous in character": Hastinapura ,. Gajasahvaja ,. Nagasahvaja; Pa. . tahpucra ,. Kusumapllra , Kusumadhvaja ,. Pu~papura.~) Turning to the other data in the passage of the Pd,sUb under consideration, we may say that the position of Chi'pin south . . west of Bolar points to Gandhara, whHe the description of the mountain,locked valley seems to apply rather to Kashmir. We have here the mixture of two traditions. The description of Kashmir applied to Chi"pin is due to. the influence of Sung I) J N. BANNERJEA, Uentificatiol/ etc, pp 749'750, wants to identify the Indw pura of the Mabiimiiytlri with HS1,p'Mo-fa,1a-rz'u f,J ii: ~ iJ(; .JIll] ,pll], a city pJaced by Hsuanttsang 40 IJ to the south of Kapisl; the name was reconstructed by WATTERS (vol. I, p. 126) as Svetavat;alaya, Svetavat being a name ofIndra. He seeks a COIlO' boratlon of this in the fact that the Zeus Ombdos, appearing on some coms of Eucratides (re-stnking Apollodotus) as the city-god of Kapiii (Katmiye nagara devata), would be nothmg but a Greek representation of Indra; J. N. BANNERJEA, Indiall elements on (oin alld devim ojfomgn fillers oj Indill, in IRQ, XI V (.938), pp. 295-'299; 10dlpendently of hIm, the same result was arnved at also by fOUCHER, La vieille route de /' Inae, pp. 1.64'265' , Both ar,guments of Banncrjea are however untenable. Hsiop'ioto_ fa,la-tz 'n cannot beSvctavatalaya; thIS was pomted out long ago by PELLIoT,in BEFEO, V (1905), p. 451 The name IS in any case to be explained through Iranian and not through Sansktit; thIS IS the common feature of the various attempt$ by MARQUART (Pas Reicb Zabu]lIl1d der Gott iI/II VOIII 6'-9. jabrlllll1aert, in FeslJCbrift 5.1(holl, BcrlJQ, 1915, p. 1.66), PELI.Ior (il1 J. As., 1923 1 , p. 162) and FOUCHER (La uieille route de /'lllde, pp. 365 :tnd 371). Foucher IS probably right 111 expl.ulung it as *spet'lImz:. "white palace '>' and m looking upon it as all old Achaememd foundation. The numismatical argument too does not hold water. The figure onlhc coin of EucrOltides is not Zeus Ombnos at all; it is" a female deity, wears a mural crown. c:4nies a palm but not a sceptre; III fact she is a city goddess"; WHrrEHBAD, Nottf Oil tbe IlIIla-Ouch, II, in NJlmismatt'c ebronicle, 1947. pp. 1.8 / 31 Thus lndrapura is not Hsi,p'i.-to/fa-Ia-tz'u;judging from the names among which it appears 10 the list of the Mahiiflliiyiiri, it seems to have bcelllacated somewhere l!l the north,east of the Peshaw:u plain. Nothing mOte can be said at prcsent. 2) BANNERJllA, IJentijicatlOfl of some AI/deut Indiall place names, p. 750.

L. PErEeR

-Yiin, who in his account had adopted the Buddhist equation Chi~pin = Kashmir. In Southern China, Chi. . pin remained more or less ignored during the whole period of the separation from the North. We have only two passing references in the hIstory of the Liang dynasty (502 . . 557). In the account of the Hua l~ (Hephthal lites) it is said that "their subordinate kingdoms are Po~ssii i'~ j~)j (Persia), P'alvp'an ~ l~ (a mistake for Ho~p'an~t'o IIh~'~ I~, Tashkurgan), Chi/pin, Yen. . ch'i ~~ • (Karashahr) and other citY1states of Central Asia.') In the account of HOI p
Cn. CHAVANI

r) Unflg,s})tI, ch. S4. f. 41 a; reproduced in NatllSbilJ. ch. 79, f IS II. l'taS. Ducutl/tlltt sur let T'()II,kiue (Ttlrcs) OcdaehtallX, St. Petersburg, 1900, MARQUAlU, DII! Reich Zabul tlha aey Golt z'm, p. 260.

p.

2) Lumg.shtl, ch. 54. f. 43 /'Ii reproduced in Nall,shih, ch. 79. f. r6 a.

224,

and

APPENDIX

they could not discard the famous name, and sought there. . fore to connect it with other countries. The SUi;shu, ch. 83, £ IS b,r> Identifies Chi;pin of the Han times with the kingdom of Ts'ao r-tJM, which is Zabul, the modern Ghazni reglOn. 'l1 The T'ang;shu, ch. 22I a, £ I3 b, applies the name to KapiSi. Later geographers identIfied It with Hindustan. And thus the spook Chi;pin haunted traditional Chinese geography down to its end in the 19th century. The two traditions about Chi. .pin had run for a long time on parallel and independent lines. Then the turning point came. The embassies of the early 6th century and the voyage. of Sung Yun ousted the Cbi;pin of the classical texts and instal; led Gandhara and Kaplsi in its place; this completely upset the historical tradition. After his return home in 645, Hsuan; tsang introduced the name Chia;ssii;mi,.Io. wbile a generation earlier Jinagupta had brought the name Chia"'pi;shih,3J and still earlier Fa;hsien had introduced Chien;t'o;wel; these new terms ejected Chl.-pin from the Buddhist tradition too. And then Chi;pin started on its ghost career. Summing up the results of our enquiry: the name Chi. . pin is originally unconnected with Kashmir; m the dynastic histories from the 1st century B. C. to the end of the 5th century A. D. it indicates the Indian territories of the great political power of the North/West, whatever it was at the time of writing (Saka, Kushan, Hephthalites); in the Buddhist tradition, from the be; ginning (2nd century A. D.) till the times of Hsiian. .tsang, Chi;pin is Kashmir. I) ThIS text is reproduced in Pei-sbi!J, ch. 97. f. 29 h. 10 spIte of the fac[ that the work already contained a separate dccount of Chi,p~n. 2) MARQUART,

Daf Reith Zab/ll ,ilia cler Colt Zm), pp. fitlagl/pta, 10 TP1 VI (t905). p. 337.

3) CHAVANNES,

249125:1.

L. PETEeR

This conclusion raises two problems. One is the origin of the name Chi/pin. After what I have said above, I can only add th:l.t a solution is more likely to come from outside the Indian linguistic area; I would not be surprised if in future the original of the name Chi~pinl*KappfQ.a wIll show up in some of the languages (dead or living) of the Indo~Iranian borderland. Nothing more can be said for the present. The other problem is: if for the Confucianist historians Chit pin is not KashmiL, then under what names was Ka.shmir known to them? The reply is simple. Till the beginning of the 6th . century, it was not known at all. The dynastic histories ,were concerned only with political relations; and till that time Kashl mit had lived its own bfe, secluded into the circle of its mountains, wIth little political contacts with the outside. IJ Three times it was brought into touch with the outer world. First by the Maurya dommation; Asoka is mentioned in the Riij(;[I tarangini among the kings of Kashmir. Then by the Kushan conquest, and this seems to have been known in a hazy and confused way even to the Chinese annalists, when they fashionl ed their first description of Chi. . pin; in the first five centuries A. D. Chi. .pin more or less included Kashmir too. Lastly, there were the wars with the Hephthahtes, which took place m the first quartet of the 6th century and ended with the conquest of the country by the foreign invaders. And this time Kashmir was noticed by the annalists, alld slowly this knowledge expanl cicd and grew to the detailed accounts of the T'ang period.

1) On the isolation of ancient Kashmir see the good remarks of FOUCHER, La ,,/tiUe lolite dt I'IlIdf, p. 2I6, n. n

( 80]

INDEXES INDEX OF THE TEXTS QUOTED Abbiniskramanamtra, 50 ArtiJl1jl1stla, ; 8 Alokiivadiilta, 36, 42, 59 A!tiidbyiiyi, 22

Liang,slJII, 6, 54, 78 Lllsao, 1 ~ LO'Ylll1g,clJio,iawd!1, 34

Brhatsa111iJlla, 67 n ClIl1dmgl1ybbllslltm, 65 Chitl T'I1/1g,s11ll, Hi n

FaAmenlchuan, 4,7. IS. 25, 30,42, 52, 59 FOlktwchi (of Chu Fa.-wel), 6 Fo-tsunglt'unglchi, 30 FOlt'1I1 t';II();(hJlfIfJ, 7 FtMlaMhi (of Chu Chlb), 7, 27, 62 FWJlafJdhlll111 (ofK 'ang T'al). 6, 24.40,53 Hai,kIlM'I/,cbIJ), 6 11 Harivamja, 27 HOIl HatJlSbll, 16 n, 68, 70, 73 Hsi,yiilcliil) (of Taolall), 5, 44

Mahiibbiirata, 38 MabiilJJoYllr;, 76, 77 MaiJiiparllliltJiilpStltra, 26, 27, 41 M
Niddmt,27 Nilamata. 66 n

PCllhu,lll, 53 Pd,Slilh, 75'77 Piell,i,tlen, 5 P'lIllao1chillg. 40

RJjatarangini.

66 n. 80

RiitIJiiyll(la, 53

ja!aka, 54

Sa/JlkIlMIJih. 55

Shih,cbi, IS 11, t611 KnO Sel/g,t/lfIlIl1, 6 n, 7 n KUl1nglCbih, 6, 15, 18 n, 74 Klladllcliih, 14, 24 I

Lalitllltistara, 36, 40, 49

ShiIM/Ji,c/)cng,i, 15 n Shi}Mhil) Hsi1'ii"hi. 5, 7, I1d4. 2V;\3, 25. 28. 30, H. 44'4 6, 49. 51. )2. 5$. 57.60, 62Sbqy,lf1t(,ym, 47

[ 8t ] fi

L PETBCH, Northern India aceordllZg to the ShUl-chmg·,hu

lNDL1UlS ~

SW,;hll, 79 Sf/yallg.llllll,

Suln!

4

47. 48; SmiillglltIJasllmililhi, 4 8

the Forty,Two SecttollS, 43

VI/Iw/akirtlllirde/asutra; 29 11 V/llwlaprabbapariprccbn: 68 Vil/aya, 27. 66

Sutrlll
W,lI,hlO,shtb (of Seng,(SOLL), 6, 25, 26. 28, 30, 33. 34, 37"39. 48, 49 Wei'/iieb, 73 f;Vei"siJtJ, 74, 75

34

T'al1g,slm, 79 'frlpi!akll, If, 70, 76 T'1I1!~,lit'tl, /1

YIIII/l,eiJiew/eitl)l1II, 5, 6, 34.4411 Ywbal1,shaIl1111:g,ti)j';"J/m,

Vdafl,/;N fell'lk,t. 53 Vayll,l'lIrl1~'J, 3H

29

n, 30 11, 33.

6, 18

GENERAL INDEX AcbaemClllds, 64. 77 n AClrav.1ti, 13, 24Afghanistan, 8, 69. 72, 73, 75 Ahm.loabad, 21 Ajap'alanyagH)dha, 39 Aj.ua.futru, 43 Alcxandm, 53 AllakapPJ, 52 Amrapali, 30 Amritsar (treaty uf), 72 Amu,da.rya, 57 >I< An.1m!l1Yganga, 37

A,she,~hlh,

43

Asoka,26, 31, 35.36,41,42.47,58.59,80 afoka tree, 35 Assam, 23

asvattlJa, 39 Attock, 67 Bactti..tna, 64-, 73. 75 Baltman, 13 Banj, 58 Bannu,

20

Anonm, Anumlya, 37 AMtatta, II A,non,ta, It, IJ, 14, 23, 44. 57

Bcgram. 69 n Benates, 43, So Bengal, 54 Bengal (Gulf of), 28 al,Bertini, 23. 67 n Bhagalpur, 5I Bhagavan, 25 Bhagiratht. 54 Bhera. Bhida. ;1I

ApaTala,

bbikpl, 43

AI4'nda,42

Am\l.1tapta, I r'[4, Anga, SI

23.

44. 45

Allthsi, 15. 6'<, 69. 70 >I<

AnOO.ltt.1.

II

lit

ApoUoootus. 77 n

A-po.-lo;lc, A~pu-k\, 61 At..c!:tOsm., 64> 69 Alai. 57. 02 Arra.h,4:1

Blura,2L B1har,43 BimbLSata, 37 Black Sea. 62 Bodh Gaya, 25. 33. 35. 38'40 , 48, 49

INDEXES

bodhi, 38/40, 48 Bodhisattva, 37, 58 Bolar, 76177 Bombay,2I Borasslis jlabellifera, 39 Brahmayoni, 39 Buddha, 19, 2.0, 2.5'2.8, 30/35, 37'39, 42, 43, 461 52 , 58,62., 66 Buddhadeva, 7 Buh,5 2 Buner, S8, 76 Burma, 27

,aitya, 27 Cambodia, 6 Campa, 51, 52 Candrabhaga, 66 Caspian Sea, 62 Central Asia,;.

II.

13. 19. 26, 68.

70 /72., 74, 7 8 Central India, 19, 20

Ceylon, 34, 52, 54, Champa, 3 n Champanagar, 51

challg.

62

60

Chang Ch'jeu, IS, r6 Chan/p'o, 51 (Later) Chao dynasty, 7 n Charsadda, 58 Chenab,66 Cheng Tc,k'un, 2 Chetcheu/darya, 14 Chhathagui, 45, 46 Ch'i dynasty, 1 Chia-hsiang/h, 40, 41 Chia-lLlchiao, 48 Chia-na, 48 n Ch'ia-na-t'lao. IS. 53 Chi;vpitsha, 74, 75 Chia/pLlShih, 79 Chia-shih, ;;0 Chi;vsbih/mi,74, 7;; Chia-ssu/mi/lo, 7:2, 79

6* - L. PETECH,

Ncrthern India accordmg

Chla-wcithwCI, 32, SO Chia-wevlo/yiieh, 34 Chla-wei-wei, 40 Chia-yeh, 48 Chien/t'o,wel, 22, 58, 79 Chieu/t'o,yuch, 60, 62. ChlCU/yUeh. 22. Chih/bu/h, 24, 53, 54 Chih,Ii,4 Chlh Scng/tsai, 6, 7, 25, 2.6, 2.8, 40 Chi'Jao,i, 3I Chm dynasty, 6,40, 74 Cbina, I, n, 2.1, 3I, 74 ChinlCheu, 2'] Ch'jug dynasty,s Chm,11l1, 27 ChlOuitcs, 8, 75 ChVPlll, 16, 17, 22, 31, 63/80 Chi-pin/jaM, 3I Chl/pin/ua, 65,68 Ch'j,she, 4-'}. 47 ChlUal, 72 ChlU/shlhAo, 58 Chvyeh, 31, 46 Chu Chih, 7, 27, 28, 62 Chu Fa-wei, 6, 7, 40, 47, 49, 50, 60 Chu FM'lao. 7 n ChiJ,itIla/ho, 25 Chii-!i, 53, 54 Chu Mou/wei, 40 Ch'uIYfou, so Chung-kuo. 2. [ Dak~magiri, A7

DardlStan, 6+ Darel, 17 Darius, I, 67 Deva, 25. 36 *Dhammarafifut, 38 Dhannaraja, 59 Dharmaralfya, 38, 39 Dharntavlvardhana. S8, S9

dm!a. 26

(0 th~

Shill-chlllil-chu

INDEXES Ea~tell1 Panjab, 72Eastern SeJ, SS Euclatide~. 77 n

EeWliia jdtttbo/dM. 50

Grdhta.kii~, 27, 44'48

Greeks m India, 64 n, 70 ~rl)apati, 48 Gupta, 8

Ell rhratcs, 6;: b.-illicn, 4, 5, 7'9, IS, 17. 19'1.1. ;:5, 27, .W'H, 3(', 38, 39. 41'45, +7'5 1 , )4, 58, 59, 61,

(is

11,79

Evi.58

Han dynasty, I, 8, 63, 70, 75. 79 Hangmg Passages, 15'19, 68, 69

Hastlnaptrra, 77 Hccataeus, 67 Heng, 23, 24

fan Ch,lll, 40, .p

HCl1g,c1Jl;t, Z3

brrllJ...hab.l,I, 30 i'Cng,lung, r~, 13 FiclH tmhe", 39 flclls rtl~ioS«J ),9, 48

Hephthahtes, 8, 75, 781\10 Hernmos, 64 n

Fo,t'u.-teng. 7 n Fo,t\vt'l;lO, 7, 49, 59 Fu,hn, 53

Hl11dukush, 8

FuAotr,shJ., 59,

Hiranya,25 Hiranyavati, 25, 28, 33

riO

Fu,nan, 6, 7. 40, 41, /l:',

Gaggara, G,'pokkhm.ni, 51 Gajasahv.ya, 77

Ganadvipa, S~ Gandak. z3, 42 Gandhira. 8, 17. 22, 57. 58. 60, 62. 64, 6'"/. 69, 71"73. 7S-79

Candh.iri, 32 n Gancihavlidi, G,llldbav;ii, Gandhavati,

HlOdustan, 79

HlIafina,

26

Ho nvet, 4 Holada, 66 n Ho,nan,mo..ch'lang, 37 HOIp'aUlt"o,7 8 Ho,pu,lo, 60, 6I Hormuz,62

Hou/lo,ch
66

T3.

14. ::4

Ganges, 5, 3.9,14.20,1.3,2;5.28,3°'33, 4 1,# 49' S5. 77 Gaur, 54 Caya, 14. W. 40, 43 C:tyi~t1'a, Gayiiir~a, 39

Ghazni, S, 79

GhorbAmd. 57 ,(iJ101,47 Gilgit. 17. IS, 69. 7:2 Cog,ra. 24. 4", So Gondophatcs, 6\1, 70 JtJbrd,47

n

HSiao Te-yen, 14 Hsj,1all,oa, 25, 26

Hsilhen,ch'an,

58

Ga,?ga,

Herodotus, 67 HImalaya, U'I4, 57

2)

HsiOlt' 0.0, 15

Hsin,r
Huai/naUlt:zti,

13, 16 11

Huallgho. II, 13

Huang,ti,

12, I3

INDEXES

Hughh. 52, 54 Hui,sheng, 75 -I<Bulada, 66 n Huna,7S Hunza, 17

KapJlavastu. 9. 25. 32'37. 40 Kapi~a, 66

I,ch1np-, 65 I,latch'iAI, 14, 57, 62 India, I, 4, 6,8, IS. 19, 25, 40, 62, 64. 66, 67, 69, 73 Indochma. 71 Indonesia, 53 Indra. 76. 77 n Indrapura, 76, 77 Indus, 5, 14, IS. 17/2 3, 25, 69. 72

han,

62

Jama. 45,51 Jalalabad, 60, 69 Jalllbli

Irce, 36, 50

Jambudvipa, 13 laun,23 Java, 35

Jhelam. IS. 21, 73 Jlllagupta, 79 Jl.lmna, 20,23,25 Kabul, 57, 69, 70, 73 KaLun, 6r Kihka,4 8 Kalpm, 66 n Kanadvlpa, 53 Kanauj. 31, 65

.. Kandahar. 69 K'an\; T'i, 6,7, 15. 24, 40, 51'55 Kaniska, 65 11, 70, 7 1 *Ka~jauJ, 3x KanJut, 17 Kan/la, 74, 75 K an,t'o,76 Kan Yil1g, 15. 16 Kao,fu, 69, 70, 73

Kapllava:di, Kapllavati, 32

Kaplsl. 8, 17, 57. 63. 64. 69'72 , 75, 77'79 Kapp(h)ina, 66,68. 80 Karashahr. 78 Karnal1.23 karpiifa, 36 Kashghar, 78 Kashmir, 22, 63 /73. 75. 77,80 K W, 50 Kaiir, 65, 68 Kasmira. 65. 68. 71173 Kaspapyros, Kaspatyros, 67 Kaspar" Kas'par, 68 Kaspeira, 65. 68 Kaspclraioi, 64, 67. 71 Kasperia, 68

*Kaspira, 64, 65, 67, 68, 71 Kaspirc!a, 68 *Kass"papura, *Kass~pa( p)urlya, 67 Ka~vira, 65, 68 Kasyapa, 67 n Kasyapa Matanga, 43 Ka~yapapura. 67

Kavilaviii, Kavllavas, 32 Khalatse. 73 Khmer, 6 Kharosthi, 61 n

Khota~, 57, 65. 73. 78 KhotaI1ldarya, 57 KIdara,60 Kol1ya.5 2

krosa,

29, 36

K;emendra, 27. 53 K~kkutavad. 66 Kumarajiva, 65 n, 71 n Kunala, S9 k'uI1Ilun, 4, n'14. 24. SS Kuo I-kung, 6,7. 15, 18, 74 Kushan, 60, 69'71, 73, 79, 80 Ku~inii.gara, 25. 21

Kusumadhvaja., Kus\ltrulpura, 77 Kuzula Kadphiscs, 69. 70

[8S]

INDEXES

udakh,73

Lan,mo,41 LCI-chu, 57. 62 Ii, 16, rll. 20, 25, 27'33, 36,37, 41, 44'46, 48'5t, 53. 60, 6l, 65.74,76.77 n

LiaIlg dynasty, I, 78 LKh'Jcn. P, 53 Li,kan, 53 Lin~i, 3 n Lin-yang, 2,7 Li Tao--ylian, I, 3. 4, 8, 9, 12'14. 20. 2,[,

28, 4£, 52" S7. 62

Liu-sha. 25'27 Lo-YJng,74 Lo-yueh-chih, 37. Lumbini,35

39,

47

25, 27

Mahamaya.5 2 Mahipadma, 66 n Maharaja.Janapada., *Mah.irat, 22, 23 MahaSangtWka, 2,7 Mahi. 14, Z4

Naga, 14, 26, 32, 36, 41, 48, 61, 66 n Nagadiba, Nagadipa, 53 Nagadvipa, 53, 54 Nagarahata. 60, 61 Nagasahva.Ja, 77 Nruraiijana, 25. 48• 49 Nanda,32

Madhyadesa, 20, 21 Magadha, 9, 34. 37. 41, 42" 45, 61 M.:ili.:lhan,58 Mahibodhi, 48 Maha.-Kapp(h)lJp,66

lvlaha:-Kasyapa,

MeAlO,\a, 22 Mo,he,Iru, 44 Monghyr,5 1 Mo;t'ou/lo. 19, 2,0 MU,12 Miilasarvastlviidm, 66 Mu\tan, 67, 68 Muzzaffarpur, 52

22, 23

Nankmg, 55, 78 Nan,to, 32 Nan,t'ou, 65 Nar:nru:aYa5as, 6.5, 66 n lIi,chwlu, 49 Nlcobar,54 Ni,lien,49 Nvlien,eh'an, 25, 48 Northern India, 3, 8, IS. 20 North,Western India, 61, 62, 75. 79 nyagrodba, 39 n, 49, 50

Oxus, 14,62

m~a, 35

Ma J(uo-han, 6, 18, 74 Malayan peninsula, 28, 5J, 54 Mata. 48,49 Mathuci. 19, 20

paqhra. 6r n Padma, S4 Pa-hu,l1, 24 PaktYlke, 67,

Maues. '}o Maurya, 70, 80 Mediterranean, 62

Pa.licn;fu, 34, 42 Palibomta. Palimbothra, 34, 42*Palimputt(a), *Piiliputr3, 42 Palmyra tree, 39 Pamir. 17, 19, 65, 69 Pan4ara-palvata, PalJ.gava-parvata. 37, 38

Megasth(nes, 4].

Meru, 14 M\ddk Kingdom, :;:0 Mihiragul.1,75 Mmg: dyMSty. 40 Mo-chith4\ .p

69

Pamni, 22,23 Pa~Jab. IS. I6, 23. 2~, 70 Panjshir. 57 [ 86]

INDEXES

P'an'p'an, 78 Palllta'po/Ch'ou, 37, 38 Piipa,27 paY/nirvana, 20, 25, 26, 42Parthll,69,70 Pataltputra, 34, 42 , 49, 51, 77 Patna,42

patlra,

39

Piivii,27 pel,to, 37. 39. 48, 49 peM/;i, 55. 74 Persia, IS. 62, 75, 78 Persian Gulf, 62 Peshawar. 59,61, 67. 69, 75, 77 n phalg~, 24 Phalgumati,24 P'j'ch'a, 19,20, 24 P'jng,sha, 37 pippa/a. 39, 48 Pl-}T lr,,\; 46' Pi,shan,68 P'lrshe.-h, 28 P'i-t'u, 19 n Po Fa-tzu, 26 P'o;hai,4 Po,li, 34 PO/li kmgdom, 51 Po,li,yiieh, 34 Po;lol\1ai, 50 P'o,lu.76 POlSsu,78 Po,t'u,lo,yiieh, 60. 61 Pratyekabuddha, 51 prtb;IJi, 61 n Ptolemy, 53, 54, 64, 67,71 Pu/Ch'iaAan, 51

pllkkbal'a/ii, 51 PuAiu..sha, 74, 75 p'uma, 21. 22 p'uma-pan, 19')')' Puru!apura, 59. 60, 75 PlISkalavati, 58, 59, 61 plI!karllli, 51

Puspapura, 77 Pu'ta,69

Qspyr,68 Ripgrha , 5, 27, 28, 33. 37'39. 42147 Rajglr,45 Rama,4I Ramagrama, 41 Rapti, 13, 24, 54 Ratnagin, 46 Remllsar, S Revati,24 Rllmmlndcl, 35 Sa-han, 14. 23, )'4 Sailag!ri,45 Sarrwang.8 Saka, 64,70

Sikera, 9. H, JZ Sakra, 43. 59. 79 Sikya, B. 34Sikyamuru, 19

rala, salaka, 26 Salt Range, 15 sangiJiiriiltlll, 19 Sankasya. 25. 30 Sankisa.30 Sarabhll, Sarayu, 13. If,24 Sarda, 13. 23, 24Sardarkot,2I Sankol,18 S3:riplltra, 46 Sarnath, 50 Sarovar, sr Sasanid. empite, 8 Satlej, .25 Sehwan, 67 n Seng/ChialSh.uYl1ai-chJeh, S~l1g~h, 30

Sh:vchlh, p Shahabad,52 Shahb;l2;garhi, 76

INPEXlS

SiJ.1hpllr, 21 Sh.\\),ehicn,76 Shansl, 74, 76 Shan Pmg/hsun, .:: Sh~n Ta-ch'eng, 7 n

Sher Sbah, Sheva,76

21

5hih Lo, 7 II

•

Siddhirt!la, 33 Sihadm, M· !iI,:, 51 Siqth.ldvlpa, ~4 Simi,67 0

T'at, 74,76 Tai Chen. 2 Takkola,54 Taksasila, 58 Tak;apa, 54 Tamrahptl,52'5S Tan,chlh, 53 n T'ang dynasty, 14, 63, 78, 80 T'an...Jan, 37/39 Tan,mcl,53 T'an,yang,5 0

Tao/an, 5, 44, 45 TaIlin,14

5lt1dhu, r 3, I4, 2Q, 2I Sita,14 Siv.lpuwahara, 76 Skylax of Karyanda, 67

Tashkurgan, 79 TaXlla, 59, 69

Son. 42

Tlgris,62 Tlrat,19

Sophagasenos, 70 Southern Chlll
Su dat;arm. 76, 77 Suddh{),\ana, 32'34

Std,IOUllla, 37. 38 SUJita. 48, 49 Sun Hsinwyen, t4 n Sung "!ilin. 7V79

Suvannabhunu, 27 Suv~udya, zS

Stl~udynka. 27. 53 SllIrarnarupyaka, S3 SVl.t1.~. S...ahya, 77 u Swat, 19, Gr, 69. 72

'fa-ell·in. )2, 51

Twmia.n

Tem, 35, 52 T'len,chu, 15. 62, 69, 70, 73

TOIIDo/hlCh'jcn, 52 T'OUlCbu/1i, 54 TrayastrlIDSa, 30

Ts'ao,79 Ts'ung,lmg, 4, IS, 57

Ttl Yu, 62

*Uda, 18, 69 Uclayagltl, 45 Uddlyana, 18 n, 19. 61, 65 Ilpiisaklr, 33, 34Uruvela, 38, 49 Uruvilv;l.IKasyapa, 38 /ltllisa, 60 U~hu, 61,62

Utpala,6711 Utrot, 6r, 62 VagguIDuda.24 VaiSali. 9. ~5, 28'30.42. 48 Vaksu, 14 Valg~l, 24 Varihamlhira, 67 n VarQU,76 [ 88 ]

INDEXES

flnta,39n

V~luvana, 37 viiJiira, 30, 49 ""VIma,50 V Imalalcirti, 28'30 Vlpulagtn, 38, 45, 46 vuya, 33 Vrji,41

Wang HSJen,ch'lel1, ;: Wang Hsuan1ts'e, 29 Wang,she, 28'44 We! dynasty, 63, 14<76 Wel/chieh,28 Wei/hsieh,h,28 WeVmo,50 WestelU CountneS, 15, 75 Westem Ind!a, 19, 62 Western Sea, 62

'We,t l?=)~b, 6.!,,69 WhJtc Huns, 8 White Mountams, 37, 38 W1ld Deer Palk, 50, 5I Wlma Kadphlses, 73 Wu dynasty, 6, 55 WlI'ch'a, 18, 69 Wu/ ch'al1g, IS n, 19,65

WlI/ch'ang,na,65 W lI,hao, 68, 69 WU1i/shanAi, 64, '69

Wular,66n Wu,{ou,)ao,6411 Yaksa,68

Yamuna, 13, 14,21,23, 24 Yang Hsi;min, 2 YaolUlI, f4, .:)3 Yarkand, IS Ya~as, 50 Yell/ch'i,7 8 YelvfOll,50

Yen/p'o,lo, 30

Ym Shlh,kll, 74 YM'iao, 35

Ym/mo,fll, 6+ II YOTal/lI, 28, 29, 37, 42 Yuelvchth, 6, 8., tS~ 60, 61.-. 64." 'H

Yueh'chlh (Rajagrha), 37, 39. 40

YUltien, 57 Zabul,79 Zabulistan, 8, 75 Zeus Ombrios, 77 n Zhob,69

PRINTED IN ROME BY THE ISTITUTO POLIGRAFICO DELLO STATO PIAZZA VERDI 10" ROMA 1950

'K~-.-""-

-- -

-

i i

{

l I i

iI

DELHI UNIVERSITY

LIBRARY