This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
1, define oo
m\p =
\ 1/2
£"'l/n|p n=0
, /
where | • | p is the norm on £®n induced by the norm on £p. Let (£p) = {tp e {L2); \\ip\\p < oo}. The projective limit (£) of {(£p); p > 1} serves as a space of test functions on the abstract white noise space (£',//). The dual space {£)* of {£) serves as the corresponding space of generalized functions. Thus we have the Gel'fand triple {£) M . (L 2 ) M- (£)*. The space {£) of test functions is an infinite dimensional analogue of the Schwartz space »S(IRd) on the finite dimensional space M.d and has many similar properties as <S(lRd). For example, it is closed under pointwise multiplication of two test functions. The differential operators, translation operators, scaling operators, Fourier-Gauss transform, Gross Laplacian, and number operator are all continuous linear operators on (£). Hence their adjoint operators are continuous on the dual space (£)*. The integral kernel operators can be defined and are
5
continuous linear operators from (£) into (£)*. Moreover, the HitsudaSkorokhod integral can be defined as a random variable on the white noise space <S'(K).
4. Characterization theorems of Potthoff-Streit and Lee (1991) In 1991 two important theorems were obtained by Potthoff and Streit [420] (for generalized functions) and by Y.-J. Lee [328] (for test functions) . The Potthoff-Streit theorem characterizes generalized functions in the space {£)* in terms of their 5-transform S * ( 0 = «*,:*<••«:»,
(££c
where £c is the complexification of £. The theorem says that a complexvalued function F on £c is the 5-transform of a generalized function in (£)* if and only if it satisfies the following conditions: (a) For any £,»/" 6 £c, the function F(z£ + rj) is an entire function of zeC; (b) There exist constants K,a,p > 0 such that |F(0|
V£e£c.
The Lee theorem describes the space (£) of test functions directly in terms of analyticity and growth condition. It says that a function tp on £' belongs to (£) if and only if for any p > 1 the function ip is analytic on £' c (the complexification of £'p) and there exists a constant Kp > 0 such that "1, \ip{x)\ < Kpexp -\x\2 Vx&£'On the other hand, test functions in {£) can also be characterized in terms of their 5-transform [304]. A complex-valued function F on £c is the 5-transform of a test function in {£) if and only if it satisfies the following conditions: (a) For any £,77 G £c, the function F(z£ + 77) is an entire function of zeC; (b) For any a,p > 0, there exists a constant K > 0 such that
|F(0|<#exp[a|£| 2 _ p ],
V£G£c
6
5. More spaces of generalized functions (1992-2000) In 1992 Kondratiev and Streit introduced a family of Gel'fand triples [243] [244]. Let 0 < (3 < 1. For tp represented by Equation (3.1) and p > 1, define 1/2
1+/
M|p*=(f>!) UG) \n=0
/
Let (£p)p = {
1} and its dual space (£)p give a new Gel'fand triple (£)0 ^
(L 2 ) ^
(£);.
Kondratiev and Streit showed in [243] [244] that generalized functions in (£)p and test functions in {£)p can be characterized as follows. A complex-valued function F on £c is the S-transform of a generalized function in (£)% if and only if it satisfies the conditions: (a) For any £, fj G £c, the function F(z£ + TJ) is an entire function of 2GC; (b) There exist constants K, a, p > 0 such that \F(0\
V£ £ £C.
(5.1)
On the other hand, a complex-valued function F on £c is the 5transform of a test function in (£)p if and only if it satisfies the conditions: (a) For any £, r\ £ £c, the function F(z£ + TJ) is an entire function of zeC; (b) For any a,p > 0, there exists a constant K > 0 such that \F(t)\
V£ G £e.
(5.2)
Test functions in the space (£)p have also been described in [290] in the same spirit of Y.-J. Lee, namely, a function ip on £' belongs to {£)p if and only if for any p > 1 the function
0 such that \ip{x)\ < C . Let us take another *-algebra B. A *-homomorphism J : B -4 A is called an algebraic random variable associated with a sample algebra A and a state algebra B. Here and then we restrict ourselves in the category of unital *-algebras and t h e n t h e algebraic r a n d o m variables are unital *homomorphism. A stochastic process on an algebraic probability space is a one-parameter family {Jt} of algebraic r a n d o m variables. Throughout this paper, we consider a stochastic process {Jn} with discrete parameters n G N . As long as we fix a set of generators {6^''}jgN C B it is sufficient to consider the set {a„ := Jn(b^) | n, j £ N } instead of {Jn}. Thus we may identify {(a„ )^Lj | j = 1, 2, .. .} with t h e discrete process. D e f i n i t i o n 1 2-3 (1) A finite or countably infinite set of sequences {(a„ )£Lj \ j = 1,2,...} of elements in A is said to satisfy the singleton condition with respect to ip if t h e factorization ¥>(«&>••• a<£>) = ?{<#?) occurs for any choice of j \ , . . . , j • • • a £ > • • • a < £ > ) E N (TO > 1), and m,...,nm 1/2 or if a = 1/2 and m is odd, we have lim )) = 0 for any n and j , satisfying uniformly bounded condition (10). Put a„ := Jn(b^'). The central limit theorem holds if any one of the following conditions is satisfied: (i) (q-commutation )u = (y,V')(L'), £{L2), {(-) = C ( £ ) - 1 exp{i(-,f)} £ (E), t h e U-transform can be extended to a continuous linear operator on (E)* by 0(£p). T h e space (£) equipped with the family {|| • || P } P >o of semi-norms (In fact norms) is a nuclear space. For any p > 0, the dual of the Hilbert space (£ p ) is isomorphic to t h e Hilbert space (£-P), which is t h e completion of the space (L 2 ) with respect to t h e norm || ip | | - p : = | | T(A)~pip || 0 . If we denote by (£)* the dual of the nuclear space (£), then (£)* — U p > o ( ^ - p ) - T h e elements in {£) are called test functions on £', while t h e elements in (£)* are called generalized functions on £'. T h e bilinear pairing between (£)* and (£) is denoted by ((•,•))• If / „ G £fn. Moreover, OO = E r = o ( : '®" : > F ")> Fn G (^c)®"- K 0 G (£)* has the above representation, then there exists p > 0 such t h a t oo G {£)* I £ = 53(:.®-: > B®"/n>Observation 8 If I denotes the identity operator on E, then for any q > 2 and ip G {Lq), we have ll(r) < || V|l(p)l| V> ||(g) • € ( i p ) and t/> = £ ~ = 0 < : -®" =.S») G (L»). Then y> o V = £ r = o < : -®" :,/»„>, where hn = E u + „ = „ /«® p = £m(Ep), £ m i 0 = £m{C), £p = £{E-p), and £0 = £(C). T h e n we have the following chain of continuous inclusions: £<x = n p > i £p C £p C £q C £o C L2[C, n] ! (E)p, equipped with the projective limit topology. Then the following chain of continuous inclusions hold: (E) C (E)p C (E)q C L2[C,n] In2/(2In7r — 2 I n 2 ) , and choose fhp be the least integer greater than Jmp e. Then
Kpexp
oU + ^ N '
VXG£"!
The collection (£)%, 0 < /3 < 1, is an increasing family of generalized functions. Kondratiev and Streit [244] also constructed a space (£)~1 of generalized functions dealing with the case (3 = 1. But the corresponding space of test functions is not a nuclear space.
7
Between the union Uo3 0 a(n)crn > 0 for some constant a > 1. (2) l i ^
M
( ^ ' " - O .
For ip represented by Equation (3.1) and p > 1, define
|MU=(£n!a(n)|/4)12. \n=0
/
2
Let [£p]a = {f £ {L ); \\
(L2)^
[£]'a.
Important examples of {a(n)} given by the Bell numbers [82]. A characterization theorem for generalized functions in the space [£]* is given in [82] with the growth condition: there exist constants K,a,p > 0 such that
|F(0l<^G a ( a |£|3 1/2 ,
(5.3)
where Ga(r) = 2jJL0 ^ ^ r " - The corresponding characterization theorem for test functions in the space [£]a is given in [36] with the growth condition: for any a,p > 0, there exists a constant K > 0 such that \F(0\
(5.4)
where G 1 / a ( r ) = E ~ = o ^ r » . For the special case a(n) = (n!)^, the growth functions in Equations (5.3) and (5.4) are different from those in Equations (5.1) and (5.2), respectively. Moreover, for a given sequence {a(n)}, it is impossible in general to sum up Ga and G\ja in close forms. This is the motivation for Asai et al. [33] [35] [38] [39] to introduce CKS-space associated with a growth function. Let u be a continuous function on [0, oo) satisfying the following conditions: (1) l i m ^ ^ = oo. (2)limsup^00^
8
Define the Legendre transform £u of u by Un) y
'
= inf —n , r>o
n = 0,1,... ,
r
and the dual Legendre transform u* of u by e 2v^S
u*(r) = sup —-—-, s>o w(s)
r > 0.
For such a function u, define a sequence au(n) by
With this sequence we get a CKS-space denoted by
[£\u M. (i 2 )
M.
[f]:.
Characterization theorems for generalized functions in [£]* and test functions in [£}u are given in [39]. A complex-valued function F on £c is the S'-transform of a generalized function in [£]* if and only if it satisfies the conditions: (a) For any £, 77 £ £ c , the function F{z(t + 77) is an entire function of zeC; (b) There exist constants K, a, p > 0 such that \F(t)\
\F(t)\
V£££c.
6. Applications of white noise theory There is a wide range of applications of white noise theory. mention just a few of them below with very brief comments. 1. Integral kernel operators
We
In 1992 Hida, Obata, and Saito introduced the integral kernel operators [193]. The generalization to operator-valued generalized functions has been done by Obata, Chung, and Ji, among others. These operators are important for applications in quantum probability.
9 2. Stochastic
integration
In 1981 Kubo and Takenaka related the white noise integral Ja d*ip(t) dt to the ltd integral /^ ip(t) dB(t). The integral / ' d*ip(t) dt turns out to be the same as the integral introduced by Hitsuda in 1972 [206] and by Skorokhod in 1975 [472]. In the paper [247] Kubo introduced the ltd formula for f(B(t)) with / being a generalized function. In 1990 Kuo and Potthoff [302] [303] studied anticipating stochastic integrals and stochastic differential equations. For more information, see the book [290]. Recent progress on white noise methods for stochastic integration has been done by Potthoff and Streit and their collaborators. 3. Infinite dimensional harmonic analysis In 1975 Hida [123] outlined several things about the infinite dimensional rotation group on the white noise space. Through the years the subgroups of this group, in particular the Levy group, have been analyzed very much by Hida, Obata, and Saito. The Levy Laplacian and related semigroups have been studied extensively by Saito and his collaborators. Recently Lee and Stan [344] obtained the infinite dimensional Heisenberg inequality. The finite dimensional Paley-Wiener theorem has been generalized to the white noise space by Stan in [473]. 4. Stochastic partial differential
equations
Since 1991 0ksendal and his collaborators have made significant progress using white noise theory to study stochastic partial differential equations. See the book [217]. Recent achievements of white noise methods to study SPDE's (in particular the Burgers equation) have been made by 0ksendal, Potthoff, Streit, and their collaborators [49] [50] [53] [87] [88] [90] [109] [212] [213]. 5. Feynman integral Feynman integral was one of the motivations for Hida to introduce white noise theory in 1975. Streit and his numerous collaborators have made revolutionary work to treat Feynman integrands as generalized functions in various spaces of generalized functions. In the paper [267] it is shown that with a rather general potential function the associated Feynman integrand is a generalized function in some big space of generalized functions. Recently, Asai et al. [17] [18] have shown that for the Albeverio-H0egh-Krohn and Laplace transform potentials the associated Feynman integrands are generalized functions in the space [£]* for some growth function u. 6. Random fields and stochastic variational calculus
10
Since 1988 Hida and Si Si have made significant progress for this application of white noise theory. For further information, see the new book by Hida [184]. 7. Intersection local times In 1991 H. Watanabe [500] used white noise theory to study the local time of self-intersections of Brownian motions. Recently Streit and his collaborators have obtained rather interesting results in [101]. 8. Infinite dimensional stochastic differential equations White noise theory can be used to study the laws of solutions of <S'(R.)-valued stochastic differential equations. In [311] it is shown that under certain conditions the laws of the solution of an <S'(R)-valued SDE induce generalized functions in the space (S)* of generalized functions. Moreover, these generalized functions satisfy an infinite dimensional partial differential equations. 9. Positive generalized functions Positive generalized functions in white noise theory was first studied by Potthoff [409] in 1987. These functions are associated with Hida measures on a white noise space. Interesting results have been obtained by Yokoi, Y.-J. Lee, Asai-Kubo-Kuo, on various spaces of generalized functions. For Hida measures on the Kondratiev-Streit space, see the
book [290]. 10. Dirichlet forms In 1988 Hida, Potthoff, and Streit [195] initiated the application of white noise theory to Dirichlet forms. Later they were joined by Albeverio and Rockner [23] [24] to achieve revolutionary work on the construction of Dirichlet forms for quantum field theory. 11. Quantum probability Recent development of quantum probability by Accardi and his collaborators (in particular, Lu, Obata, and Volovich) has shown a strong connection between white noise theory and quantum probability. See the HAS Report [16] and the Volterra Center Preprint [17] and the references therein. 7. References on white noise theory In the references below we have compiled a list of publications on white noise theory since 1975 with a few exceptions, which are listed for their influence on white noise theory. This list is by no means complete, but it gives some ideas on the development of white noise theory since 1975.
11
In addition, there have been several conference proceedings and special volumes which contain many papers related to white noise theory: (1) White Noise Analysis: Math, and Appls., T. Hida, H.-H. Kuo, J. Potthoff, and L. Streit (eds.), World Scientific, Singapore, 1990 (2) Gaussian Random Fields, K. Ito and T. Hida (eds.), World Scientific, Singapore, 1991 (3) Stochastic Analysis on Infinite Dimensional Spaces, H. Kunita and H.-H. Kuo (eds.), Longman Science & Technical, Pitman Research Notes in Math. Series, vol. 310, 1994 (4) Trends in Contemporary Infinite Dimensional Analysis and Quantum Probability, L. Accardi, N. Obata, K. Saito, Si Si, and L. Streit (eds.), Italian School of East Asian Studies, Natural and Mathematical Sciences Series 3, Intituto Italiano di Cultura, Kyoto, 2000 (5) Recent Developments in Infinite Dimensional Analysis and Quantum Probability, in honor of T. Hida's 70th birthday, L. Accardi, N. Obata, K. Saito, Si Si, and L. Streit (eds.), a special issue in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, vol. 63, nos. 1-3, 2000 (6) Collected Papers of T. Hida, L. Accardi, N. Obata, K. Saito, Si Si, and L. Streit (eds.), World Scientific, 2001 A c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s . (1) This article was prepared during my visit to Hiroshima University, May 20-August 19, 2001. I would like to give my deepest appreciation to Professor I. Kubo for submitting a proposal to Monbu-Kagaku-Sho (Ministry of Education and Science) for my visit to him and Hiroshima University. I am most grateful for the warm hospitality of the mathematics department and the personnel office of the Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University. I want to give my best thanks to Monbu-Kagaku-Sho for the financial support for my visit to Hiroshima University. (2) I would like to thank the Academic Frontier in Science of Meijo University for financial supports and to give my deep appreciation to Professors T. Hida and K. Saito for the warm hospitality during my many visits over the years 1998-2001.
REFERENCES [1] Aase, K., 0ksendal, B., Privault, N., and Ub0e, J.: A white noise generalization of the Clark-Haussmann-Ocone theorem, with application to mathematical finance; Finance and Stochastics 4 (2000) 465—496
12 [2] Aase, K., 0ksendal, B., and Ub0e, J.: Using the Donsker delta function to compute hedging strategies; Preprint University of Oslo 6/1998 and Potential Analysis (to appear) [3] Accardi, L.: Q u a n t u m stochastic calculus; Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics 1 (1985) 1-21 [4] Accardi, L.: Yang-Mills equations and Levy-Laplacian; in: Dirichlet Forms and Stochastic Processes, de Gruyter (1995) 1—24 [5] Accardi, L. and Bogachev, V.: The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process and the Dirichlet form associated to the Levy Laplacian; C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I Math, bf 320 (1995) 597-602 [6] Accardi, L. and Bogachev, V.: T h e Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process associated with the Levy Laplacian and its Dirichlet form; Probab. Math. Statist. 17 (1997) 95-114 [7] Accardi, L. and Bogachev, V.: On stochastic analysis associated with t h e Levy Laplacian; Dokl. Akad. Nauk 358 (1998) 583-587 [8] Accardi, L., Boukas, A., and Kuo, H . H . : On t h e unitarity of stochastic evolutions driven by t h e square of white noise; Preprint (2000) [9] Accardi, L. and Bozejko, M.: Interacting Fock space and Gaussianization of probability measures; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 1 (1998) 663-670 [10] Accardi, L., Gibilisco, P., and Volovich, I. V.: Yang-Mills gauge fields as harmonic functions for the Levy Laplacian; Russian J. Math. Phys. 2 (1994) 235-250 [11] Accardi, L., Hashimoto, Y., and Obata, N..: Notions of independence related to the free group; Infinite Dim. Anal, Quantum Prob. and Related Topics 1 (1998) 201-220 [12] Accardi, L., Hashimoto, Y., and Obata, N..: Singleton independence; Banach Center Publications 4 3 (1998) 9-24 [13] Accardi, L., Hashimoto, Y., and Obata, N..: A role of singletons in quantum central limit theorems; J. Korean Math. Soc. 35 (1998) 675-690 [14] Accardi, L., Hida, T., and Kuo, H.-H.: Ito table for the square of white noise; Preprint (2000) [15] Accardi, L., Hida, T., and Win Win Htay: Boson Pock representations of stationary processes (in Russian); Mathematical Notes 6 7 (2000) 3-14 [16] Accardi, L., Lu, Y. G., and Volovich, I.: T h e Hilbert module and interacting Fock spaces; HAS Reports 1 9 9 7 - 0 0 8 (1997) [17] Accardi, L., Lu, Y. G., and Volovich, I. V.: White noise approach to classical and quantum stochastic calculi; Centra Vito Volterra, Universita di Roma "Tor Vergata" 375 (1999) [18] Accardi, L., Lu, Y. G., and Volovich, I. V.: A white noise approach to stochastic calculus; Acta Appl. Math. 6 3 (2000) 3-25 [19] Accardi, L., Rozelli, P., and Smolyanov, O. G.: Brownian motion generated by the Levy Laplacian; Mat. Zametki 54 (1993) 144-148 [20] Albeverio, S., Daletzky, Y., Kondratiev, Yu. G., and Streit, L.: Non-Gaussian infinite dimensional analysis; J. Fund. Analysis 138 (1996) 311-350 [21] Albeverio, S., Fukushima, M., Karwowski, W., and Streit, L.: Capacity and quantum mechanical tunneling; Comm. math. Phys 81 (1981) 501
13
[22] Albeverio, S., Gesztesy, F., Karwowski, W., and Streit, L.: On the connection between Schrodinger and Dirichlet forms; J. Math. Phys 26 (1985) 2546 [23] Albeverio, S., Hida, T., Potthoff, J., Rockner, M., and Streit, L.: Dirichlet forms in terms of white noise analysis I-Construction and Q F T examples; Rev. Math. Phys. 1 (1990) 291-312 [24] Albeverio, S., Hida, T., Potthoff, J., Rockner, M., and Streit, L.: Dirichlet forms in terms of white noise analysis II-Closability and diffusion processes; Rev. Math. Phys. 1 (1990) 313-323 [25] Albeverio, S., Hida, T., Potthoff, J., and Streit, L.: T h e Vacuum of the Hoegh-Krohn model as a generalized white noise functional; Phys. Lett. B 217 (1989) 511-514 [26] Albeverio, S., Hoegh-Krohn, R., and Streit, L.: Energy forms, Hamiltonians, and distorted Brownian paths; J. Math. Phys. 18 (1977) 907 [27] Albeverio, S., Karwowski, W., Rockner, M., and Streit, L.: Capacity, Green's functions and Schroedinger equation; in: Infinite Dimensional Analysis and Stochastic Processes, P i t m a n 1985 [28] Albeverio, S., Kondratiev, Yu. G., and Streit, L.: How to generalize white noise analysis to non-Gaussian measures; in: Dynamics of Complex and Irregular Systems, P h . Blanchard et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1993) 120-130 [29] Asai, N:: A note on general setting of white noise analysis and positive generalized functions; RIMS Kokyuroku 1 1 3 9 (2000) 19-29 [30] Asai, N: Characterization of product measures by integrability condition; to appear in: Q u a n t u m Information III, T. Hida and K. Saito (eds.) World Scientific (2001) 21-33 [31] Asai, N: Analytic characterization of one-mode interacting Fock space; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics (to appear) [32] Asai, N: Integral transform and Segal-Bargmann representation associated to g-Charlier polynomials; Quantum Information 4, World Scientific (2001) [33] Asai, N., Kubo, I., and Kuo, H.-H.: Characterization of Hida measures in white noise analysis; in Infinite Dimensional Harmonic Analysis, Transactions of a Japan-Germany Symposium, H. Heyer et al. (eds.) (1999) 70-83, Druck D . + M . Grabner [34] Asai, N., Kubo, I., and Kuo, H.-H.: Feynman integrals associated with Albeverio-H0egh-Krohn and Laplace transform potentials; in Stochastic in Finite and Infinite Dimensions, in honor of G. Kallianpur, T. Hida et al. (eds.) (2000) 29-48, Birkhauser [35] Asai, N., Kubo, I., and Kuo, H.-H.: CKS-space in terms of growth functions; in Quantum Information II, T. Hida and K. Saito (eds.) (2000) 17-27, World Scientific [36] Asai, N., Kubo, I., and Kuo, H.-H.: Characterization of test functions in CKSspace; in Mathematical Physics and Stochastic Analysis: Essays in Honor of Ludwig Streit, A. Albeverio et al. (eds.) (2000) 68-78, World Scientific [37] Asai, N., Kubo, I., and Kuo, H.-H.: Bell numbers, log-concavity, and logconvexity; Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 6 3 (2000) 79—87 [38] Asai, N., Kubo, I., and Kuo, H.-H.: Roles of log-concavity, log-convexity, and growth order in white noise analysis; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability, and Related Topics 4 (2001) 59-84
14 [39] Asai, N., Kubo, I., and Kuo, H.-H.: General characterization theorems and intrinsic topologies in white noise analysis; Hiroshima Math. J. 3 1 (2001) 299-330 [40] Asai, N., Kubo, I., and Kuo, H.-H.: Segal-Bargmann transforms of onemode interacting Fock spaces associated with Gaussian and Poisson measures; Preprint (2001) [41] Asch, J. and Potthoff, J.: A generalization of Ito's lemma; Proc. Japan Acad. 6 3 (1987) 289-291 [42] Asch, J. and Potthoff, J.: White noise and stochastic analysis; in: Stochastics, Algebra and Analysis in Classical and Quantum Dynamics, S. Albeverio et al. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers (1990) [43] Asch, J. and Potthoff, J.: Ito's lemma without non-anticipatory conditions; Probab. Th. Rel. Fields 88 (1991) 17-46 [44] Benth, F. E.: Integrals in the Hida distribution space (<S)*; Stochastic Monogr. 8 (1993) 89-99 [45] Benth, F. E.: A generalized Feynman-Kac formula for the stochastic heat problem with anticipating initial conditions; Progr. Probab. 38 (1996) 121 133 [46] Benth, F. E.: On the positivity of t h e stochastic heat equation; Potential Anal. 6 (1997) 127-148 [47] Benth, F . E.: T h e Gross derivative and generalized random variables; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics bf 2 (1999) 381-396 [48] Benth, F., Deck, Th., Potthoff, J.: A white noise approach to a class of non-linear stochastic heat equations; J. Fund. Anal. 146 (1997) 382-415 [49] Benth, F. E., Deck, Th., Potthoff, J., and Streit, L.: Nonlinear evolution equations with gradient coupled noise; Lett. Math. Phys. 4 3 (1998) 267-278 [50] Benth, F . E., Deck, Th., Potthoff, J, and Vage, G.: Explicit strong solutions of SPDE's with applications to non-linear filtering; Acta Appl. Math. 51 (1998) 215-242 [51] Benth, F. E., 0ksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: Wick products of complex valued random variables; in: Stochastic Analysis and Related Topics (5), H. Korezlioglu et al. (eds.), Birkhauser (1996) 135-155 [52] Benth, F. and Potthoff, J.: On the martingale property for generalized stochastic processes; Stochastics and Stochastics Reports 58 (1996) 349-367 [53] Benth, F . E. and Streit, L.: The Burgers equation with a non-Gaussian random force; Progr. Probab. 42 (1998) 187-210, Birkhauser [54] Bernido, C. C. and Carpio-Bernido, M.V.: P a t h integrals for boundaries and topological constraints: A white noise functional approach; Preprint (2001) [55] Betounes, D.: Generalized stochastic differential equations on (D)*; Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 176 (1992) 32-37 [56] Betounes, D.: Trace operators, Feynman distributions, and multiparameter white noise; Journal of Theoretical Probability 8 (1995) 119-138 [57] Betounes, D. and Redfern, M.: Differential forms with values in (L2)~; in: White Noise Analysis, World Scientific (1990) 31-42 [58] Betounes, D. and Redfern, M.: Wiener distributions and white noise analysis; J. Appl. Math. Optim. 26 (1992) 63-93
15 Betounes, D. and Redfern, M.: Stochastic integrals for nonprevisible, multiparameter processes; J, of Appl. Math. Optim. 28 (1993) 197-223 Betounes, D. and Redfern, M.: T h e Stratonovich integral via the renormalization operator on Fock space; Stochastics and Stochastics Reports 56 (1996) 161-178 Bltimlinger, M. and Obata, N.: Permutations preserving Cesaro mean, densities of natural numbers and uniform distribution of sequences; Ann. Inst. Fourier Grenoble 41 (1991) 665-678 Carmona, R. and Yan, J. A.: A new space of white noise distributions and applications to SPDE's; in: Seminar on Stochastic Analysis, Random Fields and Applications (1995) 51-66 Chow, P. L.: Generalized solution of some parabolic equations with a random drift; J. Appl. Math. Optim. 2 0 (1989) 81-96 Chow, P. L.: Stationary solutions of some parabolic Ito equations; Pitman Research Notes in Math. Series 3 1 0 (1994) 42-51, Longman Scientific & Technical Chung, D. M. and Chung, T. S.: First order differential operators in white noise; Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1998) 2367-2376 Chung, D. M., Chung, T. S., and Ji, U. C : A simple proof of analytic characterization theorem for operator symbols; Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 34 (1997) 421-436 Chung, D. M., Chung, T. S., and Ji, U. C : Products of white noise functionals and associated derivations; J. Korean Math. Soc. 35 (1998) 559-574 Chung, D. M., Chung, T. S., and Ji, U. C : A characterization theorem for operators on white noise functionals; J. of Math. Soc. Japan 51 (1999) 437-447 Chung, D. M. and Ji, U. C : Cauchy Problems for a Partial Differential Equation in White Noise Analysis; J. Korean Math. Soc. 33 (1996) 309-318 Chung, D. M. and Ji, U. C : Wick Derivations on White Noise Functionals; J. Korean Math. Soc. 33 (1996) 559-574 Chung, D. M. and Ji, U. C : Transforms on white noise functionals with their applications to Cauchy problems; Nagoya Math. J. 147 (1997) 1-23 Chung, D. M. and Ji, U. C : Transformation groups on white noise functionals and their applications; Appl. Math. Optim. 37 (1998) 205-223 Chung, D. M. and Ji, U. C : Some Cauchy problems in white noise analysis and associated semigroups of operators; Stoch. Analy. Appl. 17 (1999) 1-22 Chung, D. M. and Ji, U. C : Multi-parameter transformation groups on white noise functionals; J. Math. Anal, and Appl. 2 5 2 (2000) 729-749 Chung, D. M. and Ji, U. C : Poisson equations associated with differential second quantization operators in white noise analysis; Acta Applicadae Mathernaticae 63 (2000) 89-100 Chung, D. M., Ji, U. C, and Obata, N.: Transformations on white noise functions associated with second order differential operators of diagonal type; Nagoya Math. J. 1 4 9 (1998) 173-192 Chung, D. M., Ji, U. C, and Obata, N.: Higher powers of quantum white noises in terms of integral kernel operators; Infinite Dim. Anal., Quantum Prob. and Related Topics 1 (1998) 533-559
16 [78] Chung, D. M., Ji, U. C, and Obata, N.: Normal-ordered white noise differential equations II: Regularity properties of solutions; in: Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, B. Grigolionis et al. (eds), VSP BV and T E V Ltd. (1999) 157-174 [79] Chung, D. M., Ji, U. C, and Obata, N.: Normal-ordered white noise differential equations I: Existence of solutions as Fock space operators; in: Trends in Contemporary Infinite Dimensional Analysis and Quantum Probability, L. Accardi et al. (eds), Istituto Italiano di Cultura, Kyoto (2000) 115-135 [80] Chung, D. M., Ji, U. C , and Saito, K.: Cauchy problems associated with the Levy Laplacian in white noise analysis; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 2 (1999) 131-153 [81] Chung, D. M., Ji, U. C , and Saito, K.: Notes on a Co-group generated by the Levy Laplacian; Proc. American Mathematical Society (2001) [82] Cochran, W. G., Kuo, H.-H., and Sengupta, A.: A new class of white noise generalized functions; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability, and Related Topics 1 (1998) 43-67 [83] Cochran, W. G., Lee, J.-S., and Potthoff, J.: Stochastic Volterra equations with singular kernels; Stoch. Proc. Appl. 56 (1995) 337-349 [84] Cochran, W. G. and Potthoff, J.: Fixed point principles for stochastic partial differential equations; in: Dynamics of Complex and Irregular Systems, P h . Blanchard et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1993) [85] Deck, Th.: Hida distributions over compact Lie groups; Infinite Dim. Anal. Quantum Probab. and Related Topics 3 (2000) 337-362 [86] Deck, Th.: Continuous dependence on initial d a t a for non-linear stochastic evolution equations; Preprint (2001) [87] Deck, Th., Kruse, S., Potthoff, J., and Watanabe, H.: White noise approach to stochastic partial differential equations; in: Proc. Int. Conf. on SPDE's, Levico (2000) [88] Deck, Th. and Potthoff, J.: On a class of stochastic partial differential equations related to turbulent transport; Probab. Th. Rel. Fields 1 1 1 (1998) 1 0 1 122 [89] Deck, Th., Potthoff, J., and Vage, G.: A review of white noise analysis from a probabilistic standpoint; Acta Appl. Math. 4 8 (1997) 91-112 [90] Deck, Th., Potthoff, J., Vage, G., and Watanabe, H.: Stability of solutions of parabolic P D E ' s with random drift and viscosity limit; Appl. Math. Optim. 4 0 (1999) 393-406 [91] de Falco, D. and Khandekar, D. C : Applications of white noise calculus to the computation of Feynman integrals; Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 29 (1988) 257-266 [92] de Faria, M., Drumond, C , and Streit, L.: T h e renormalization of selfintersection local times. I. T h e chaos expansion; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 3 (2000) 223-236 [93] de Faria, M., Hida, T., Streit, L., and Watanabe, H.: Intersection local times as generalized white noise functionals; Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 46 (1997) 351-362 [94] de Faria, M. and Kuo, H.-H.: A delta white noise functional; Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 17 (1989) 287-298
17 de Faria, M., Oliveira, M. J., and Streit, L.: A generalized Clark-Ocone formula; Random Oper. Stock. Eqs. 8 (2000) 163-174 de Faria, M., Potthoff, J., and Streit, L.: T h e Feynman integrand as a Hida distribution; J. Math. Phys. 32 (1991) 2123-2127 de Faria, M. and Streit, L.: Some recent advances in white noise analysis; Pitman Research Notes in Math. Series 3 1 0 (1994) 52-59, Longman Scientific & Technical Doku, I.: On a class of infinite-dimensional Fourier type transforms in white noise calculus; in: Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, World Scientific (1995) 51-61 Doku, I.: On the Laplacian on a space of white noise functionals; Tsukuba J. Math. 19 (1995) 93-119 Doku, I., Kuo, H.-H., and Lee, Y.-J.: Fourier transform and heat equation in white noise analysis; Pitman Research Notes in Math. Series 3 1 0 (1994) 60-74, Longman Scientific & Technical Drumond, C , de Faria, M., and Streit, L.: The square of self-intersection local time of Brownian motion; in: Stochastic Processes, Physics and Geometry: New Interplays I, a volume in honor of Sergio Albeverio, F. Gesztesy et al. (eds.) - CMS Conf. Proc. 28, Amer. Math Soc. (2000) 115-122 Gannoun, R., Hachaichi, R., Ouerdiane, H., and Rezgui, A.: Un theoreme de dualite entre espaces de fonctions holomorphes a croissance exponentiele; J. Fund. Anal. 1 7 1 (2000) 1-14 Gielerak, R., Karwowski, W., and Streit, L.: Construction of a class of characteristic functionals; in: Feynman Path Integrals, S. Albeverio et al. (eds.), Lecture Notes in Physics 106 (1979) 182-188, Springer Gjerde, J., Holden, H., 0ksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: An equation modelling transport of a substance in a stochastic medium; in: Seminar on Stochastic Analysis, Random Fields and Applications, E. Bolthausen et al. (eds.), Progress in Probability, Vol.36, Birkhauser (1995) 123-134 Gjessing, H., Holden, H., Lindstr0m, T., Oksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: T h e Wick product; in: Frontiers in Pure and Applied Probability, Vol. I, H. Niemi et al. (eds.), T V P Science Publishers, (1993) 29-67 Grothaus, M., Khandekar, D. C , da Silva, J. L., and Streit, L.: T h e Feynman integral for time-dependent anharmonic oscillators; J. Math. Phys. 38 (1997) 3278-3299 Grothaus, M., Kondratiev, Yu. G., and Streit, L.: Complex Gaussian analysis and the Bargmann-Segal space; Methods of Funct. Anal. Topology 3 (1997) 46-64 Grothaus, M., Kondratiev, Yu. G., and Streit, L.: Regular generalized functions in Gaussian analysis; Infinite Dim. Anal. Quantum Prob. and Related Topics 2 (1999) 1-25 Grothaus, M., Kondratiev, Yu. G., and Streit, L.: Scaling limits for the solution of Wick type Burgers equation; Random Oper. Stochastic Equations 8 (2000) 1-26 Grothaus, M., Kondratiev, Yu. G., and Us, G. F.: Wick calculus for regular generalized stochastic functionals; Random Oper. Stochastic Equations 7 (1999) 263-290
Grothaus, M. and Streit, L.: Construction of relativistic quantum fields in the framework of white noise analysis; J. Math. Phys. 4 0 (1999) 5387-5405 Grothaus, M. and Streit, L.: Quadratic actions, semi-classical approximation, and delta sequences in Gaussian analysis; Rep. Math. Phys. 4 4 (1999) 3 8 1 405 Grothaus, M. and Streit, L.: On regular generalized functions in white noise analysis and their applications; Methods of Funct. Anal. Topology 6 (2000) 14-27 Grothaus, M., Streit, L., and Volovich, I.: Knots, Feynman diagrams and matrix models; Infinite Dim. Anal. Quantum Prob. and Related Topics 2 (1999) 359-380 Hashimoto, Y., Obata, N., and Tabei, N.: A quantum aspect of asymptotic spectral analysis of large Hamming graphs; in: Quantum Information HI, T. Hida and K. Saito (eds.) (2001) Hida, T.: Stationary Stochastic Processes. Princeton University Press, 1970 Hida, T.: Harmonic Analysis on the space of generalized functions; Teor. Verojatnost. i Primenen. (Theory of Probability and its applications) 15 (1970) 119-124 Hida, T.: Note on the infinite dimensional Laplacian operator; Nagoya Math. J. 38 (1970) 13-19 Hida, T.: Quadratic functional of Brownian motion; J. Multivariate Analysis 1 (1971) 58-69 Hida, T.: Complex white noise and infinite dimensional unitary group, Lecture Notes, Mathematics Dept., Nagoya Univ. no.3, 1971 Hida, T.: A role of Fourier transform in t h e theory of infinite dimensional unitary group; J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 1 3 (1973) 203-212. Hida, T.: Functionals of complex white noise; Proc. Symp. on Continuous Mechanics and related problems of Analysis 1 Tbilisi, USSR, 1973, 355-366 Hida, T.: Analysis of Brownian Functionals. Carleton Mathematical Lecture Notes 13, 1975 Hida, T.: White noise analysis and nonlinear filtering problems; Applied Mathematics and Optimization 2 (1975) 82-89 Hida, T.: Analysis of Brownian functionals; Mathematical Programming Study 5 (1976) 53-59 Hida, T.: Functionals of Brownian motion; Transaction of 7th Prague Conf. and 191J, European Meeting of Statisticians A (1977) 239-243 Hida, T.: Topics on nonlinear filtering theory; Multivariate analysis 4 (1977) 239-245 Hida, T.: Generalized multiple Wiener integrals; Proc. Japan Acad. 5 4 A (1978) 55-58 Hida, T.: Generalized Brownian functionals; Complex Analysis and its Applications, I. N. Vekua Volume (1978) 586-590 Hida, T.: White noise and Levy's functional analysis; Lecture Notes in Math. 6 9 5 (1978) 155-163 Hida, T.: White noise and Levy's functional analysis; Lecture Notes in Math. 6 9 5 (1978) 155-163 Hida, T.: Generalized multiple Wiener integrals; Proc. Japan Acad. 5 4 A (1978) 55-58
19 [133] Hida, T.: Nonlinear Brownian functionals; Proc. 18th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 1 (1979) 326-328 Hida, T.: Brownian Motion. Springer-Verlag, 1980 Hida, T.: Causal analysis in terms of Brownian motion. Multivariate Analysis V,(ed. P. R. Krishnaiah) North Holland, 1980, 111-118. Hida, T.: Causal analysis in terms of white noise; in: Quantum Fields Algebra, Processes, L. Streit (ed.) Springer-Verlag (1980) 1-19 Hida, T.: Theory of probability, Gaussian processes and Physics (in Japanese); Monthly Journal Physics 2 (1980) 152-158 Hida, T.: Causal calculus of Brownian functionals and its applications; Proc. International Symposium on Statistics and Related Topics, D.A. Dawson et al. (eds.) (1981) 353-360 Hida, T.: White noise analysis and its applications; Proc. International Mathematical Conference, L. H. Y. Chen et al. (eds.) North Holland (1982) 43-48 Hida, T.: Calculus of Brownian functionals; Proc. International Mathematical Conference, L. H. Y. Chen et al. (eds.) North Holland (1982) 155-185 Hida, T.: The role of exponential functions in t h e analysis of generalized Brownian functionals; Teor. Verojatnost. i Primenen. 2 7 (1982) 569-573 (English translation Theory of Prob. and its Appl. 2 7 (1983) 609-613 Hida, T.: Causal calculus and an application to prediction theory; Prediction Theory and Harmonic Analysis, V. Mandrekar and H. Salehi (eds.) (1983) 123-130, North-Holland Hida, T.: Generalized Brownian functionals; Proc. IFIP-WG Theory and Application of Random Field, Lee. Notes in Control and Information Sci. 49 (1983) 89-95 Hida, T.: White noise analysis and its applications to quantum dynamics; Physica 1 2 4 A (1984) 399-412 Hida, T.: Generalized Brownian functionals and stochastic integrals; Appl. Math. Optimization 12 (1984) 115-123 Hida, T.: Brownian motion and its functionals; Ricerche di Matematica 34 (1985) 183-222 Hida, T.: Brownian functionals and t h e rotation group; Mathematics + Physics, L. Streit (ed.) 1 (1985) 167-194 Hida, T.: White noise analysis and its applications to biology; Proc. 15th NIBB Conf. Information Processing in Neuron Network, K. Naka and Y. Ando (eds.) (1986) 3-13 Hida, T.: Infinite dimensional rotation group and its applications to quantum dynamics; Proc. 14th ICGTMP Conf, Y. M. Cho (ed.) (1986) 234-237 Hida, T.: Generalized Gaussian measures; Supplemento ai Rend, del Circolo Matematico Palermo, Ser. II17 (1987) 229-236 Hida, T.: Generalized Gaussian measures; Functional integrations with emphasis on the Feynman integrals, Sherbrooks, P Q , 1986 Hida, T.: White noise analysis and stochastic functional differential equations; Studies in Modeling and Statistical Sci. Australian J. of Statistics, the J. Gani volume 3 0 A (1988) 241-246 Hida, T.: A note on generalized Gaussian random fields; J. Multivariate Anal. 2 7 (1988) 255-260
20 [154] Hida, T.: White noise and stochastic variational calculus for Gaussian random fields; in:Dynamics and Stochastic Processes, Lee. Notes in Physics 335 (1988) 136-141 [155] Hida, T.: Infinite-dimensional rotation group and unitary group; Lecture Notes in Math 1379 (1989) 125-134, Springer-Verlag [156] Hida, T.: White noise analysis and Gaussian random fields; Proc. the 24th Winter School of Theoretical Physics, Karpacz, Stochastic Methods in Math, and Phys., R. Gielerak and W. Karwowski (eds.) (1989) 277-289 [157] Hida, T.: Functionals of Brownian motion; Lectures in Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Luigi M. Ricciardi (ed.), Manchester Univ. Press, 1990, 286329. [158] Hida, T.: White noise and random fields - old and new; Proc. Gaussian Random Fields, T. Hida and K. Saito (eds.) (1991) 1-10 [159] Hida, T.: Stochastic variational calculus; Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 176 (1992) 123-134, Springer-Verlag [160] Hida, T.: White noise and Gaussian random fields; in: Probability Theory, Louis H. Y. Chen (ed.), Walter de Ruyter & Co. (1992) 83-90 [161] Hida, T.: The impact of classical functional analysis on white noise calculus; Centro Vito Volterra, Universita Degli Studi Di Roma II (1992) # 9 0 [162] Hida, T.: A role of t h e Levy Laplacian in the causal calculus of generalized white noise functionals; in: Stochastic Processes, G. Kallianpur Volume, S. Cambanis (ed.) (1993) 131-139 [163] Hida, T.: White noise analysis and applications; Stochastic Analysis and Applications in Physics, A. I. Cardoso et al. (eds.) (1994) 119-131, Kluwer Academic Publishers [164] Hida, TV. Some recent results in white noise analysis; Pitman Research Notes in Math. Series 310 (1994) 111-116, Longman Scientific & Technical [165] Hida, T.: Random fields as generalized white noise functionals; Acta Appl. Math. 35 (1994) 49-61 [166] Hida, T.: Analysis of random functionals - Theory of nonlinear functions and applications (in Japanese); Kagaku 64 (1994) 334-339 [167] Hida, T.: White noise analysis: An overview and some future directions; HAS Reports 1995-001 (1995) [168] Hida, T.: White noise analysis and applications in random fields; in: Proc. of the Conference on Dirichlet Forms and Stochastic Processes, Z. Ma et al. (eds.) Walter de Gruiter (1995) 185-189 [169] Hida, T.: Infinite dimensional rotation group and white noise analysis; in: Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, Proc. 20th Coloq. on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, A. Arima et al. (eds.) World Scientific (1995) 1-9 [170] Hida, T.: A note on stochastic variational equations; in: Exploring Stochastic Laws. Korolyuk Volume, A. V. Skorohod and Yu. V. Borovskikh (eds.) (1995) 147-152 [171] Hida, T.: Random fields and quantum dynamics; Foundations of Physics 27 (1997)1511-1518 [172] Hida, T.: Fluctuation, nonlinearity and for human beings; J. Tokyo University of Information Sciences 2 (1998) 169-177 [173] Hida, T.: White noise approach to fluctuations; J. Korean Math. Soc. 35 (1998) 575-581
21 Hida, T.: Some of future directions in white noise analysis; Quantum Information, T. Hida and K. Saito (eds.) (1999) 103-110 Hida, T.: White noise analysis and quantum dynamics; Mathematical Methods of Quantum Physics, H. Ezawa, Volume (1999) 3-8 Hida, T.: Harmonic analysis on complex random systems; in: Infinite Dimensional Harmonic Analysis. Transactions of Japanese-Germany Symp., H. Heyer and T. Hirai (eds.) (1999) 160-166 Hida, T.: Complexity in white noise analysis; Quantum Information II, Hida and K. Saito (eds.) (2000) 61-70 Hida, T.: White noise approach to Feynman integrals; in: Proceedings of Feynman integral Conference, Seoul, 1999 (to appear) Hida, T.: Complexity and irreversibility in stochastic analysis; in: Proceeding of the Les Treilles Conference, Solvay Inst., 1999 (to appear) Hida, T.: White noise theory and physics; in: Proceeding of Millennial Symposium: Defining the Science Stochastics, Wuerzburg. 2000 (to appear) Hida, T.: Innovation approach to random complex systems; Pub. Centra Vito Volterra 4 3 3 (2000) Hida, T.: Some methods of computation in white noise calculus; in: Unconventional Model of Computation UMC2K, Solvay Institute, I. Antoniou et al. (eds.) (2001) 85-93 Hida, T.: Innovation approach to stochastic process and quantum dynamics; Proc. Vaxjo Conference on Foundations of Probability and Physics, World Scientific Publ. (2001) Hida, T.: White Noise and Functional Analysis (to appear) Hida, T. and Kallianpur, G.: T h e square of a Gaussian Markov process and nonlinear prediction; J. of Multivariate Analysis 5 (1975) 451-461 Hida, T., Kubo, I., Nomoto, H., and Yoshizawa, H.: On projective invariance of Brownian motion; Publ. RIMS Kyoto Univ., A 4 (1968) 595-609 Hida, T. and Kuo, H.-H.: Semigroups associated with generalized Brownian functional; Semigroup Forum 4 5 (1992) 261-263 Hida, T., Kuo, H.-H., and Obata, N.: Transformations for white noise funct i o n a l ; J. Fund. Anal. I l l (1993) 259-277 Hida, T., Kuo, H.-H., Potthoff, J., and Streit, L.: White Noise: An Infinite Dimensional Calculus. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993 Hida, T., Lee, K.-S., and Lee, S.-S.: Conformal invariance of white noise; Nagoya Math. J. 98 (1985) 87-98 Hida, T., Lee, K.-S., and Si Si: Multidimensional parameter white noise and Gaussian random fields; Balakrishnan Volume, A. B. Aries (ed.) (1987) 177183, Optimization Software Hida, T. and Mimachi, Y.: Some thoughts on infinite dimensional rotation group; Quantum Information 4 , World Scientific (2001) Hida, T., Obata, N., and Saito: Infinite dimensional rotations and Laplacians in terms of white noise calculus; Nagoya Math. J. 128 (1992) 65-93 Hida, T. and Potthoff, J.: White noise analysis - An overview; in: White Noise Analysis, Mathematics and Applications (1990) 140-165 Hida, T., Potthoff, J., and Streit, L.: Dirichlet forms and white noise analysis; Cornmun. Math. Phys. 116 (1988) 235-245
22 [196] Hida, T., PotthofF, J., and Streit, L.: White noise analysis and applications; Mathematics + Physics 3 (1988) 143-178 [197] Hida, T., Potthoff, J., and Streit, L.: Energy forms and white noise analysis; New Methods and Results in Nonlinear Field Equations, Lee, Notes in Phys. 3 4 7 (1989) 115-125 [198] Hida, T. and Saito, K.: White noise analysis and the Levy Laplacian; Stochastic Processes in Physics and Engineering, S. Albeverio et al. (eds.) (1988) 177-184, Reidel Publishing Company [199] Hida, T. and Saito, K.: Introduction to white noise analysis; Bielefeld Encounters in Math, and Phys. VII. BIBOS Publications 4 0 0 (1989) [200] Hida, T. and Si Si: Variational calculus for Gaussian random fields; Proc. IFIP Warsaw, Lee. Notes in Control and Information Sci. 136 (1989) 86-97 [201] Hida, T. and Si Si: Stochastic variational equations and innovations for random fields; in: Infinite Dimensional Harmonic Analysis. Transactions of German-Japanese Symposium, H. Heyer and T. Hirai (eds.) (1995) 86-93 [202] Hida, T. and Si Si: Innovation for random fields; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 1 (1998) 499-509 [203] Hida, T. and Si Si: Elemental random variables in white noise theory, beyond Reductionism; Quantum Information 3 (2001) (to appear) [204] Hida, T. and Streit, L.: On quantum theory in terms of white noise; Nagoya Math. J. 68 (1977) 21-34 [205] Hida, T. and Streit, L.: Generalized Brownian functionals; Proc. Vl-th International Conference on Mathematical Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics 153 (1982) 285-287 [206] Hitsuda, M.: Formula for Brownian partial derivatives; Second Japan-USSR Symp. Probab. Th. 2 (1972) 111-114 [207] Hitsuda, M.: Formula for Brownian partial derivatives; Publ. Fac. Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Series III 4 (1978) 1-15 [208] Holden, H., Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., and Ub0e, J.: Discrete Wick calculus and stochastic functional equations; Potential Analysis 1 (1992) 291-306 [209] Holden, H., Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., and Ub0e, J.: Discrete Wick products; in: Stochastic Analysis and Related Topics (J), T. Lindstr0m et al. (eds.), Gordon and Breach (1993) 123-148 [210] Holden, H., Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: Stochastic boundary value problems. A white noise functional approach; Probability Theory and Related Fields 9 5 (1993) 391-419 [211] Holden, H., Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: A comparison experiment for Wick multiplication and ordinary multiplication; in: Stochastic Analysis and Related Topics (4), T. Lindstr0m et al. (eds.), Gordon and Breach (1993) 149-160 [212] Holden, H., Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: The Burgers equation with a noisy force and the stochastic heat equation; Comm. PDE 19 (1994) 119-141 [213] Holden, H., Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: T h e stochastic Wick-type Burgers equation; in: Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, A. Etheridge (ed.), Cambridge Univ. Press (1995) 141-161
23 Holden, H., Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: T h e pressure equation for fluid flow in a stochastic medium; Potential Analysis 4 (1995) 655-674 Holden, H. and 0ksendal, B.: A white noise approach to stochastic differential equations driven by Wiener and Poisson noises; in: Nonlinear Theory of Generalized Functions, M. Grosser et al. (eds.) Chapman & Hall/CRC (1999) 293-313 Holden, H. and 0ksendal, B.: A white noise approach to stochastic Neumann boundary value problems; Preprint University of Oslo 8/1999 and Acta Appl. Math, (to appear) Holden, H., 0ksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: Stochastic Partial Differential Equations. Birkhauser, 1996 Hu, Y., Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: Inverse powers of white noise; in: Stochastic Analysis, M. G. Cranston and M. Pinsky (eds.), American Mathematical Society (1995) 439-456 Hu, Y. and 0ksendal, B.: Wick approximation of quasilinear stochastic differential equations; in: Stochastic Analysis and Related Topics (5), H. Korezlioglu (ed.) Birkhauser (1996) 203-231 Hu, Y. and 0ksendal, B.: Fractional white noise calculus and applications to finance; Preprint, University of Oslo 10/1999 Hu, Y. and 0ksendal, B.: Chaos expansion of local time of fractional Brownian motions; Preprint, University of Oslo 20/2000 Hu, Y., 0ksendal, B., and Salopek, D. M.: Weighted local time for fractional Brownian motion and applications to finance; Preprint (2000) Hu, Y., 0ksendal, B., and Sulem, A.: Optimal consumption and portfolio in a Black-Scholes market driven by fractional Brownian motion; Preprint, University of Oslo 23/2000 Hu, Y. and 0ksendal, B., and Sulem, A.: A stochastic maximum principle for processes driven by fractional Brownian motion; Preprint, University of Oslo 24/2000 Hu, Y. and 0ksendal, B., and Zhang, T.: Stochastic partial differential equations driven by multiparameter fractional white noise; in: Stochastic Processes, Physics and Geometry: New Interplays II, a volume in honor of S. Albeverio, F . Gesztesy et al. (eds.) American Mathematical Society (2000) 327-337 Huang, Z.-Y.: Stochastic calculus of variation on Gaussian spaces and white noise analysis; in: Gaussian random fields, World Scientific (1991) 227-241 Huang, Z.-Y.: Q u a n t u m white noises-White noise approach to quantum stochastic calculus; Nagoya Math. J. 129 (1993) 23-42 Ito, Y.: On a generalization of nonlinear Poisson functionals; Math. Rep. Toyama Univ. 3 (1980) 111-122 Ito, Y.: Generalized Poisson functionals; Probab. Theory Related Fields 77 (1988) 1-28 Ito, Y. and Kubo, I.: Calculus on Gaussian and Poisson white noises; Nagoya Math. J. I l l (1988) 41-84 Ito, Y., Kubo, I. and Takenaka, S.: Calculus on Gaussian white noise and Kuo's Fourier transformation; White Noise Analysis-Mathematics and Applications, T. Hida et al. (eds.) (1990) 180-207, World Scientific
24 [232] Ji, U. C. and Obata, N.: Initial value problem for white noise operators and quantum stochastic processes; in: Infinite Dimensional Harmonic Analysis, H. Heyer et al. (eds.), D . + M . Grabner (2000) 203-216 [233] Kallianpur, G. and Kuo, H.-H.: Regularity property of Donsker's delta function; Appl. Math. Optim. 12 (1984) 89-95 [234] Kang, S.-J.: Heat and Poisson equations associated with number operator in white noise analysis; Soochow J. Math. 2 0 (1994) 45-55 [235] Karwowski, W. and Streit, L.: A renormalization group model with nonGaussian fixed point; Rep. Math. Phys 13 (1978) 1 [236] Khandekar, D. C. and Streit, L.: Constructing the Feynman integrand; Annalen der Physik 1 (1992) 49-55 [237] Khrennikov, A. and Huang, Z.: A model for white noise analysis in p-adic number fields; Acta Math. Sci. 16 (1996) 1-14 [238] Kondratiev, Yu. G., Leukert, P., Potthoff, J., Streit, L., and Westerkamp, W.: Generalized functionals in Gaussian spaces-the characterization theorem revisited; J. Funct. Analysis 1 4 1 (1996) 301-318 [239] Kondratiev, Yu. G., Leukert, P., and Streit, L.: Wick calculus in Gaussian analysis; Acta Appl. Math 44 (1996) 269-294 [240] Kondratiev, Yu. G., da Silva, J. L., and Streit, L.: Generalized Appell systems; Meth. Funct. Anal. Top. 3 (1997) 28-61 [241] Kondratiev, Yu. G., Silva, J. L., and Streit, L.: Differential geometry on compound Poisson space; Methods Funct. Anal. Topology 4 (1998) 32-58 [242] Kondratiev, Yu. G., da Silva, J. L., Streit, L., and Us, G.: Analysis on Poisson and gamma spaces; Inf. Dim. Anal. Qu. Prob. 1 (1998) 91-117 [243] Kondratiev, Yu. G. and Streit, L.: A remark about a norm estimate for white noise distributions; Ukrainean Math. J. 4 4 (1992) 832-835 [244] Kondratiev, Yu. G. and Streit, L.: Spaces of white noise distributions: Constructions, Descriptions, Applications. I; Reports on Math. Phys. 3 3 (1993) 341-366 [245] Kondratiev, Yu. G., Streit, L., and Westerkamp, W.: A note on positive distributions in Gaussian analysis; Ukrainian Math. J. 4 7 (1995) 749-759 [246] Kondratiev, Yu. G., Streit, L., and Westerkamp, W., and Yan, J. A.: Generalized functions in infinite dimensional analysis; Hiroshima Math. Journal 28 (1998) 213-260 [247] Kubo, I.: Ito formula for generalized Brownian functionals; Lecture Notes in Control and Information Scis. 49 (1983) 156-166, Springer-Verlag [248] Kubo, I.: The structure of Hida distributions; in: Mathematical Approach to Fluctuations I, World Scientific (1994) 49-114 [249] Kubo, I.: A direct setting of white noise calculus; Pitman Research Notes in Math. Series 310 (1994) 152-166, Longman Scientific & Technical [250] Kubo, I.: Weighted number operators and associated process; in: Infinite Dimensional Harmonic Analysis (1996) 146-155 [251] Kubo, I.: Generalized functionals in white noise analysis; in: Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, Word Scientific (1996) 237-243 [252] Kubo, I.: Non-isotropic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process and white noise analysis; in: Stochastic Differential and Difference Equations, Birkhauser (1997) 167182
25 [253] Kubo, I.: Entire Functionals and generalized functionals in white noise analysis; in: Analysis on infinite-dimensional Lie groups and algebra, World Scientific (1998) 207-215 [254] Kubo, I. and Kuo, H.-H.: Fourier transform and cylindrical Hida distributions; in Stochastic Processes, a Festschrift in Honor of G. Kallianpur, S. Cambanis et al. (eds.), Springer-Verlag (1993) 191-201 [255] Kubo, I. and Kuo, H.-H.: Finite dimensional Hida distributions; J. Fund. Anal. 128 (1995) 1-47 [256] Kubo, I. and Kuo, H.-H.: A simple proof of Hida distribution characterization theorem; Exploring Stochastic Laws, Festschrift in Honor of the 70th Birthday of V. S. Korolyuk, A. V. Skorokhod & Yu. V. Borovskikh (eds.) (1995) 2 4 3 250, International Science Publishers [257] Kubo, I., Kuo, H.-H., and Sengupta, A.: White noise analysis on a new space of Hida distributions; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability, and Related Topics 2 (1999) 315-335 [258] Kubo, I. and Lee, S.-S.: Non-linear predictors of transformed stationary processes; Nagoya Math. J. 95 (1984) 23-40 [259] Kubo, I. and Mustafid: Limit theorem of symmetric statistics represented by multiple Poisson-Wiener integrals; in: Abstract of Papers of Supplementary meeting to the 15th SPA Conference (1986) 17-19 [260] Kubo, I. and Takenaka, S.: Calculus on Gaussian white noise I; Proc. Japan Acad. 5 6 A (1980) 376-380 [261] Kubo, I. and Takenaka, S.: Calculus on Gaussian white noise II; Proc. Japan Acad. 5 6 A (1980) 411-416 [262] Kubo, I. and Takenaka, S.: Calculus on Gaussian white noise III; Proc. Japan Acad. 5 7 A (1981) 433-437 [263] Kubo, I. and Takenaka, S.: Calculus on Gaussian white noise IV; Proc. Japan Acad. 5 8 A (1982) 186-189 [264] Kubo, I., Takenaka, S., and Urakawa, H.: Brownian motion parametrized with metric space of constant curvature; Nagoya Math. J. 82 (1981) 131-140 [265] Kubo, I. and Yokoi, Y.: A remark on the space of testing random variables in the white noise calculus; Nagoya Math. J. 115 (1989) 139-149 [266] Kubo, I. and Yokoi, Y.: Generalized functions and functionals in fluctuation analysis; in: Mathematical Approach to Fluctuations II, World Scientific (1995) 203-230 [267] Kuna, T., Streit, L., and Westerkamp, W.: Feynman integrals for a class of exponentially growing potentials; J. Math. Phys. 39 (1998) 4476-4491 [268] Kuo, H.-H.: Fourier-Wiener transform on Brownian functionals; Lecture Notes in Math., Springer-Verlag 8 2 8 (1980) 146-161 [269] Kuo, H.-H.: On Fourier transform of generalized Brownian functionals; J. Multivariate Analysis 12 (1982) 415-431 [270] Kuo, H.-H.: Donsker's delta function as a generalized Brownian functional and its application; Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 49 (1983) 167-178, Springer-Verlag [271] Kuo, H.-H.: Fourier-Mehler transforms of generalized Brownian functionals; Proc. Japan Acad. 5 9 A (1983) 312-314 [272] Kuo, H.-H.: Brownian functionals and applications; ^Icio Appl. Math. 1 (1983) 175-188
26 [273] Kuo, H.-H.: A Fourier transform characterization of Gaussian Brownian funct i o n a l ; Bull Inst. Math. Academia Sinica 11 (1983) 407-413 [274] Kuo, H.-H.: Brownian functionals and applications; Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 1 (1983) 175-188 [275] Kuo, H.-H.: Fourier-Mehler transforms of generalized Brownian functionals; Proc. Japan Academy 5 9 A (1983) 312-314 [276] Kuo, H.-H.: On Laplacian operators of generalized Brownian functionals; Lecture Notes in Math. 1203 (1986) 119-128, Springer-Verlag [277] Kuo, H.-H.: The heat equation and the Fourier transform of generalized Brownian functionals; Lecture Notes in Math., Springer-Verlag 1236 (1987) 154-163 [278] Kuo, H.-H.: Brownian motion, diffusions and infinite dimensional calculus; Lecture Notes in Math., Springer-Verlag 1316 (1988) 130-169 [279] Kuo, H.-H.: White noise calculus; in Algebra, Analysis and Geometry, M. C. Kang and K. W. Lih (eds.), World Scientific (1989) 77-119 [280] Kuo, H.-H.: Stochastic partial differential equations of generalized Brownian functionals; Lecture Notes in Math., Springer-Verlag 1 3 9 0 (1989) 138-146 [281] Kuo, H.-H.: T h e Fourier transform in white noise calculus; J. Multivariate Analysis 3 1 (1989) 311-327 [282] Kuo, H.-H.: Fourier-Mehler transforms in white noise analysis; Gaussian Random Fields, K. Ito and T. Hida (eds.) (1991) 257-271, World Scientific [283] Kuo, H.-H.: Lectures on white noise analysis; Soochow J. Math. 18 (1992) 229-300 [284] Kuo, H.-H.: Convolution and Fourier transform of Hida distributions; Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 176 (1992) 165-176, SpringerVerlag [285] Kuo, H.-H.: An introduction to white noise calculus; Aportaciones Matemdticas, Notas de Investigacion 7 (1992) 1-12 [286] Kuo, H.-H.: Infinite Dimensional Stochastic Analysis. Nagoya University Lecture Notes in Math. 11 (1993) [287] Kuo, H.-H.: Analysis of white noise functionals; Soochow J. Math. 20 (1994) 419-464 [288] Kuo, H.-H.: White noise analysis; in Proc. Workshops in Pure Math. 14, part II: Analysis, D. Kim (ed.) (1994) 27-40, P u r e Math. Research A s s o c , Korean Academic Council [289] Kuo, H.-H.: An infinite dimensional Fourier transform; in Stochastic Processes, Physics, and Geometry II, S. Albeverio et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1995) 482-490 [290] Kuo, H.-H.: White Noise Distribution Theory. CRC Press, 1996 [291] Kuo, H.-H.: A characterization of Hida measures; in Stochastic Processes and Functional Analysis, J. A. Goldstein et al. (eds.), Marcel Dekker (1997) 147-151 [292] Kuo, H.-H.: Stochastic integration via white noise analysis; Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods, and Applications 30 (1997) 317-328 [293] Kuo, H.-H.: Anticipatory Ito's formula and Hitsuda-Skorokhod integral; in Skorokhod's Ideas in Probability Theory, V. Korolyuk et al. (eds.), Proc. Institute of Math., National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Vol. 32 (2000) 248-255
27 Kuo, H.-H.: Growth functions in white noise theory; Soochow J. Math. 26 (2000) 327-342 Kuo, H.-H.: Some aspects of white noise analysis; in Proceedings of the Volterra International School on White Noise Approach to Classical and Quantum Stochastic Calculi, L. Accardi (ed.) World Scientific (to appear) Kuo, H.-H.: White noise theory; in Handbook of Stochastic Analysis and Applications, D. Kannan and V. Lakshmikantham (eds.) Marcel Dekker (to appear) Kuo, H.-H., Lee, Y . J . , and Shih, C.-Y.: Wiener-Ito theorem in terms of Wick tensors; Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 63 (2000) 203-218 Kuo, H.-H. and Nishi, K.: An anticipatory Ito formula; Proc. Japan Academy 7 2 A (1996) 36-38 Kuo, H.-H., Obata, N., and Saito, K.: Levy Laplacian of generalized functionals on a nuclear space; J. Fund. Anal. 94 (1990) 74-92 Kuo, H.-H., Obata, N., and Saito, K.: Diagonalization of the Levy Laplacian and related stable processes; Preprint (2001) Kuo, H.-H., Obata, N., and Saito, K.: White noise analysis based on the Leevy Laplacian; Preprint (2001) Kuo, H.-H. and PotthofF, J.: Anticipating stochastic integrals and stochastic differential equations; White Noise Analysis-Mathematics and Applications, T. Hida et al. (eds.) (1990) 256-273, World Scientific Kuo, H.-H. and Potthoff, J.: Anticipating stochastic differential equations; in Probability Theory and Math. Stat., Proc. 5th Intern. Conference, vol. 2, 35-46, Vilnius, Lithuania (1990) Kuo, H.-H., Potthoff, J., and Streit, L.: A characterization of white noise test functionals; Nagoya Math. J. 121 (1991) 185-194 Kuo, H.-H., Potthoff, J., and Yan, J.-A.: Continuity of affine transformations of white noise test functionals and applications; Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 4 3 (1992) 85-98 Kuo, H.-H. and Russek, A.: White noise approach to stochastic integration; J. Multivariate Analysis 24 (1988) 218-236 Kuo, H.-H., Saito, K., and Stan, A.: A Hausdorff-Young inequality for white noise analysis; Preprint (2001) Kuo, H.-H. and Shieh, N. R.: A generalized Ito's formula for multidimensional Brownian motions and its applications; Chinese J. Math. 15 (1987) 163-174 Kuo, H.-H. and Smolenski, W.: On admissible shifts of generalized white noises; J. Multivariate Analysis 12 (1982) 80-88 Kuo, H.-H. and Sun, T . - C : Absolute value of white noise as a generalized Brownian functional; Soochow J. Math 15 (1989) 205-211 Kuo, H.-H. and Xiong, J.: Stochastic differential equations in white noise space; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability, and Related Topics 1 (1998) 611-632 Lascheck, A., Leukert, P., Streit, L., and Westerkamp, W.: Quantum mechanical propagators in terms of Hida distributions; Rep. Math. Phys. 33 (1993) 221-232 Lascheck, A., Leukert, P., Streit, L., and Westerkamp, W.: More about Donsker's delta function; Soochow J. Math. 20 (1994) 401-418
28 [314] Lee, J.-S.: Properties of the Fourier transform in white noise analysis; Kyungpook Math. J. 3 5 (1996) 695-704 [315] Lee, K. Sim: Gel'fand triples associated with finite-dimensional Gaussian measure; Soochow J. Math. 22 (1996) 1-16 [316] Lee, Y.-J.: Applications of the Fourier-Wiener transform to differential equations on infinite dimensional spaces, I; Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 6 2 (1980) 259-283 [317] Lee, Y.-J.: Parabolic equations on infinite dimensional spaces; Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica 9 (1981) 279-292 [318] Lee, Y.-J.: Applications of the Fourier-Wiener transform to differential equations on infinite dimensional spaces, II; J. Diff. Equa. 4 1 (1981) 59-86 [319] Lee, Y.-J.: Fundamental solutions for differential equations associated with the number operator; Trans. Amer. Soc. 2 6 8 (1981) 467-476 [320] Lee, Y.-J.: Integral transforms of analytic functions on abstract Wiener spaces; J. Fund. Anal. 4 7 (1982) 153-164 [321] Lee, Y.-J.: A correction and some additions to the paper "TAMS 268 (1981) 467-476"; Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 276 (1983) 621-623 [322] Lee, Y.-J.: Wiener process and Hardy spaces on abstract Wiener spaces; Proc. NSC, Part A 10 (1986) 275-280 [323] Lee, Y.-J.: Sharp inequalities and regularity of heat semigroup on infinite dimensional spaces; J. Funct. Anal. 71 (1987) 69-87 [324] Lee, Y.-J.: Unitary operators on the space of Z/ 2 -functions over abstract Wiener spaces; Soochow J. Math. 13 (1987) 165-174 [325] Lee, Y.-J.: Generalized functions on infinite dimensional spaces and its application to white noise calculus; J. Funct. Anal. 82 (1989) 429-464 [326] Lee, Y.-J.: On t h e convergence of Wiener-Ito decomposition; Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica 17 (1989) 305-312 [327] Lee, Y.-J.: A reformulation of white noise calculus; in: White Noise Analysis - Mathematics and Applications, T. Hida et al. (eds.) World Scientific (1990) 274-293 [328] Lee, Y.-J.: Analytic version of test functionals, Fourier transform and a characterization of measures in white noise calculus; J. Funct. Anal. 100 (1991) 359-380 [329] Lee, Y.-J.: A characterization of generalized functions on infinite-dimensional spaces and Bargman-Segal analytic functions; Gaussian Random Fields, K. Ito and T. Hida (eds.) (1991) 272-284, World Scientific [330] Lee, Y.-J.: Positive generalized functions on infinite dimensional spaces; in: Stochastic Processes, A Festschrift in Honour of Gopinath Kallianpur, Springer-Verlag (1993) 225-234 [331] Lee, Y.-J.: Transformation and Wiener-Ito decomposition of white noise functionals; Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica 21 (1993) 279-291 [332] Lee, Y.-J.: Exact formula of certain functional integrals on Wiener spaces; Stochastic and Stochastic Report 5 0 (1994) 211-223 [333] Lee, Y.-J.: Transformation of white noise functionals and applications; Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series 3 1 0 (1994) 183-196 [334] Lee, Y.-J.: Integral representation of second quantization and its application in white noise analysis; J. Funct. Anal. 133 (1995) 253-276
29 [335] Lee, Y.-J.: A generalization of Mehler transform; in: Proc. International Mathematics Conference, Y. Fong et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1996) [336] Lee, Y.-J.: Convergence of Fock expansion and transformations of Brownian functionals; in: Functional Analysis and Global Analysis, T. Sunada and P. W. Sy (eds.) (1996) 142-156 [337] Lee, Y.-J.: A generalization of Riesz representation theorem to infinite dimensions; J. Fund. Anal. 151 (1997) 121-137 [338] Lee, Y.-J.: Generalized white noise functionals on classical Wiener spaces; J. Korean Math. Soc. 35 (1998) 613-635 [339] Lee, Y.-J. and Shih, C.-Y.: A probabilistic approach to the integral representation of positive generalized white noise functionals; Stochastic Analysis and its Applications (to appear) [340] Lee, Y.-J. and Shih, C.-Y.: T h e Riesz representation theorem in infinite dimensions and Its applications; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics (to appear) [341] Lee, Y.-J. and Shih, H.-H.: T h e Segal-Bargmann transform for Levy functionals; J. Fund. Anal. 168 (1999) 46-83 [342] Lee, Y.-J. and Shih, H.-H.: Donsker-Delta function of Levy process; Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 63 (2000) 219-231 [343] Lee, Y.-J. and Shih, H.-H.: Ito formula for generalized Levy functionals; Quantum Information II, T. Hida and K. Saito (eds.), Word Scientific (2000) 87-105 [344] Lee, Y.-J. and Stan, A.: An infinite dimensional Heisenberg uncertainty principle; Taiwanese J. Math. 3 (1999) 529-538 [345] Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., and Ub0e, J.: Stochastic differential equations involving positive noise; Stochastic Analysis, M. Barlow and N. Bingham (eds.) (1991) 261-303, Cambridge University Press [346] Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., and Ub0e, J,: Stochastic modelling of fluid flow in porous media; in: Control Theory, Stochastic Analysis and Applications, S. Chen and J. Yong (eds.), World Scientific (1991) 156-172 [347] Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., and Ub0e, J.: Wick multiplication and ItoSkorohod stochastic differential equations; in: Ideas and Methods in Mathematical Analysis, Stochastics and Applications, S. Albeverio et al. (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press (1992) 183-206 [348] Lindstr0m, T., 0ksendal, B., Ub0e, J., and Zhang, T.: Stability properties of stochastic partial differential equations; Stochastic Analysis and Applications 13 (1995) 177-204 [349] Luo, S. and Yan, J. A.: Generalized Fourier-Mehler transforms on white noise functional spaces; Chinese Sci. Bull. 4 3 (1998) 1321-1325 [350] Luo, S. and Yan, J. A.: Gaussian kernel operators on white noise functional spaces; Sci. China Ser. A 4 3 (2000) 1067-1074 [351] Meyer, P.-A. and Yan, J. A.: Distributions sur l'espace de Wiener (suite) d'apres I. Kubo et Y. Yokoi; Lecture Notes in Math. 1 3 7 2 (1989) 382-392 [352] Ngobi, S. and Stan, A.: An extension of the Clark-Ocone formula; Preprint (2001) [353] Nishi, K. and Saito, K.: The Levy Laplacian and the number operator; RIMS Kokyuroku 1 1 9 3 (2001)
30 [354] Nishi, K., Saito, K., and Tsoi, A. H.: A stochastic expression of a semigroup generated by t h e Levy Laplacian; in: Quantum Information III, World Scientific (2001) [355] Obata, N.: Certain unitary representations of the infinite symmetric group I; Nagoya Math. J. 105 (1987) 109-119 [356] Obata, N.: Certain unitary representations of the infinite symmetric group II; Nagoya Math. J. 106 (1987) 143-162 [357] Obata, N.: Analysis of t h e Levy Laplacian; Soochow J. Math. 14 (1988) 105-109 [358] Obata, N.: A note on certain permutation groups in the infinite dimensional rotation group; Nagoya Math. J. 109 (1988) 91-107 [359] Obata, N.: Density of natural numbers and the Levy group; J. Number Theory 3 0 (1988) 288-297 [360] Obata, N.: T h e Levy Laplacian and the mean value theorem; Lecture Notes in Math. 1 3 7 9 (1989) 242-253, Springer-Verlag [361] Obata, N.: Some remarks on induced representations of infinite discrete groups; Math. Ann. 2 8 4 (1989) 91-102 [362] Obata, N.: A characterization of the Levy Laplacian in terms of infinite dimensional rotation groups; Nagoya Math. J. 118 (1990) 111-132 [363] Obata, N.: Integral expression of some indecomposable characters of t h e infinite symmetric group in terms of irreducible representations; Math. Ann. 2 8 7 (1990) 369-375 [364] Obata, N.: Construction of irreducible unitary representations of amalgams of discrete abelian groups; J. Math. Soc. Japan 42 (1990) 585-603 [365] Obata, N.: Isometric operators on L x -algebras of hypergroups; in: Probability Measures on Groups X (H. Beyer Ed.), Plenum Press, New York (1991) 315328 [366] Obata, N.: Rotation-invariant operators on white noise functionals; Math. Z. 2 1 0 (1992) 69-89 [367] Obata, N.: Elements of white noise calculus; Centro V. Volterra publications 1 2 4 (1992) [368] Obata, N.: An analytic characterization of symbols of operators on white noise functionals; J. Math. Soc. Japan 4 5 (1993) 421-445 [369] Obata, N.: White noise delta functions and continuous version theorem; Nagoya Math. J. 129 (1993) 1-22 [370] Obata, N.: Operator calculus on vector-valued white noise functionals; J. Fund. Anal. 121 (1994) 185-232 [371] Obata, N.: White Noise Calculus and Fock Space. Lecture Notes in Math. 1577, Springer-Verlag, 1994 [372] Obata, N.: Harmonic analysis and infinite dimensional Laplacians on Gaussian space; in: Quantum Probability and Related Topics IX, L. Accardi et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1994) 327-370 [373] Obata, N.: Conditional expectation in classical and quantum white noise calculi; Analysis of Operators on Gaussian Space and Quantum Probability Theory, RIMS Kokyuroku 923 (1995) 154-190 [374] Obata, N.: Fock expansion of operators on white noise functionals; in: Stochastic Processes, Physics and Geometry II, S. Albeverio et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1995) 557-568
31 [375] Obata, N.: Derivations on white noise functionals; Nagoya Math. J. 139 (1995) 21-36 [376] Obata, N.: Lie algebras containing infinite dimensional Laplacians; in: Probability Measures on Groups and Related Structures, H. Heyer (ed.), World Scientific (1995) 260-273 [377] Obata, N.: Generalized quantum stochastic processes on Fock space; Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 31 (1995) 667-702 [378] Obata, N.: White noise approach to quantum martingales; in: Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, M. Fukushima et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1996) 379-386 [379] Obata, N.: Invitation to quantum white noise; in: Dynamical Systems in Infinite Dimensional Spaces, Y. M. Park (ed.), P u r e Math. Res. A s s o c , Korean Academic Council (1996) 1-34 [380] Obata, N.: Constructing one-parameter transformation groups on white noise functions in terms of equicontinuous generators; in: Infinite Dimensional Harmonic Analysis, H. Heyer and T. Hirai (eds.), Grabner (1996) 169-187 [381] Obata, N.: Integral kernel operators on Fock space - Generalizations and applications to quantum dynamics; Acta Appl. Math. 4 7 (1997) 49-77 [382] Obata, N.: Quantum stochastic differential equations in terms of quantum white noise; Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications 30 (1997) 279-290 [383] Obata, N.: Time-ordered Wick exponential and quantum stochastic differential equations; in: Quantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement, C. M. Caves et al. (eds.), Plenum (1997) 355-363 [384] Obata, N.: Constructing one-parameter transformation groups on white noise functions in terms of equicontinuous generators; Monatsh. Math. 124 (1997) 317-335 [385] Obata, N.: A note on Hida's whiskers and complex white noise; in: Analysis on Infinite-Dimensional Lie Groups and Algebras, H. Heyer and J. Marion (eds.), World Scientific (1998) 321-336 [386] Obata, N.: A note on normal-ordered white noise equations; in: Invited Lectures at the VIH-th Internat. Colloq. Differential Equations I I , D. Kolev (ed.), Academic Publications (1999) 109-118 [387] Obata, N.: Wick product of white noise operators and quantum stochastic differential equations; J. Math. Soc. Japan 5 1 (1999) 613-641 [388] Obata, N.: A note on coherent state representations of white noise operators; in: Quantum Information II, T. Hida and K. Saito (eds.), World Scientific (2000) 135-147 [389] Obata, N.: Quantum stochastic analysis via white noise operator theory; in: Proc. Internat. Conf. on Probability and Statistics and Their Applications, Hanoi Institute of Mathematics (2000) 41-65 [390] Obata, N.: Coherent state representations in white noise calculus; Can. Math. Soc. Conference Proceedings 29 (2000) 517-531 [391] Obata, N.: White noise operators associated with the C o c h r a n - K u o Sengupta space; Proc. Japan-Germany Seminar (2000) [392] Obata, N.: Complex white noise and coherent state representation; Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 63 (2000)
32 [393] Obata, N.: White noise operator theory: Fundamental concepts and developing applications; Proceedings of Volterra International School (2000) [394] Obata, N.: Coherent state representation and unitarity condition in white noise calculus; J. Korean Math. Soc. 38 (2001) [395] Obata, N.: Unitarity criterion in white noise calculus and nonexistence of unitary evolutions driven by higher powers of quantum white noises; Proc. Mexico Guanajuato Conference (2001) [396] Obata, N.: Quadratic quantum white noises and Levy Laplacian; Nonlinear Analysis (2001) [397] Obata, N. and Wildberger, N. J.: Generalized hypergroups and orthogonal polynomials; Nagoya Math. J. 142 (1996) 67-93 [398] Oksendal, B.: Stochastic partial differential equations: A mathematical connection between macrocosmos and microcosmos; in: Analysis, Algebra, and Computers in Mathematical Research, M. Gyllenberg and L. E. Persson (eds.), Marcel Dekker (1994) 365-385 [399] Oksendal, B.: Some mathematical models for population growth in a stochastic environment; in: Proc. 9th SAMSA Symposium "Mathematics and the Environment", R. K. Colegrave et al. (eds.), University of Botswana (1994) 40-54 [400] Oksendal, B.: Stochastic partial differential equations and applications to hydrodynamics; in: Stochastic Analysis and Applications in Physics, A. I. Cardoso et al. (eds.), NATO ASI Series, Vol.449. Kluwer (1994) 283-305 [401] Oksendal, B.: An Introduction to Malliavin Calculus with Applications to Economics. Lecture Notes from a course given 1996 at the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH), NHH Preprint Series, 1996 [402] Oksendal, B. and V0ge, G.: A moving boundary problem in a stochastic medium; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 2 (1999) 179-202 [403] Oksendal, B. and Zhang, T.: The stochastic Volterra equation; in: Barcelona Seminar on Stochastic Analysis, D. Nualart and M. Sanz Sole (eds.), Birkhauser (1993) 168-202 [404] Oksendal, B. and Zhang, T.: The general linear stochastic Volterra equation with anticipating coefficients; in: Stochastic Analysis and Applications, I. M. Davis et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1996) 343-366 [405] Oksendal, B. and Zhang, T.: Multiparameter fractional Brownian motion and quasi-linear stochastic partial differential equations; Preprint, University of Oslo 5/2000 and Stochastics and Stochastics Reports (to appear) [406] Ouerdiane, H. and Rezgui, A.: Un theoreme de Bochner-Minlos avec une condition d'integrabilite; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 3 (2000) 297-302 [407] Potthoff, J.: On the connection of the white-noise and Malliavin calculi; Proc. Japan Acad. 62 (1986) 43-45 [408] Potthoff, J.: White-noise approach to Malliavin's calculus; J. Fund. Anal. 7 1 (1987) 207-217 [409] Potthoff, J.: On positive generalized functional; J. Fund. Anal. 74 (1987) 81-95 [410] Potthoff, J.: Littlewood - Paley theory on Gaussian spaces; Nagoya Math. J. 109 (1988) 47-61
33 Potthoff, J.: On Meyer's equivalence; Nagoya Math. J. H I (1988) 99-109 Potthoff, J.: On the construction of Dirichlet forms in infinite dimensions; in: Proc. of the IX-th Int. Congr. Math. Phys. B. Simon et al. (eds.), Adam Hilger (1989) Potthoff, J.: Stochastic integration in Hida's white noise analysis; in: Stochastic Processes, Physics and Geometry, S. Albeverio et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1990) Potthoff, J.: Introduction to white noise analysis; in: Control Theory, Stochastic Analysis and Applications, S. Chen and J. Yong (eds.), World Scientific (1991) Potthoff, J.: White noise methods for stochastic partial differential equations; in: Stochastic Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications, B.L. Rozovskii and R.B. Sowers (eds.), Springer (1992) Potthoff, J.: White noise approach to parabolic stochastic partial differential equations; in: Stochastic Analysis and Applications in Physics, A.I. Cardoso et al. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers (1994) Potthoff, J.: On differential operators in white noise analysis; Acta Appl. Math., a special volume in honor of T. Hida (2001) Potthoff, J. and Rockner, M.: On the contraction property of energy forms in infinite dimensions; J. Fund. Anal. 92 (1990) 155-165 Potthoff, J. and Smajlovic, E.: On Donsker's delta function in white noise analysis; in: Mathematical Physics and Stochastic Analysis - Essays in honour of L. Streit, S. Albeverio et al. (eds.), World Scientific (2000) Potthoff, J. and Streit, L.: A characterization of Hida distributions; J. Fund. Anal. 1 0 1 (1991) 212-229 Potthoff, J. and Streit, L.: Generalized Radon-Nikodym derivatives and Cameron-Martin theory; Gaussian Random Fields, K. Ito and T. Hida (eds.) (1991) 320-331, World Scientific Potthoff, J. and Streit, L.: White noise analysis and what it can do for physics; in: Gaussian Random Fields, K. Ito and T. Hida (eds.), World Scientific (1991) 58-68 Potthoff, J. and Streit, L.: Invariant states on random and quantumfields:<j> bounds and white noise analysis; J. Fund. Anal. I l l (1993) 295-311 Potthoff, J. and Sundar, P.: Law of large numbers and central limit theorem for Donsker's Delta function; Stochastics and Stochastic Reports 4 3 (1993) 135-150 Potthoff, J. and Sundar, P.: Limit theorems for the Donsker delta function: An example; in: Stochastic Analysis and Related Topics, T. Lindstr0m (eds.), Gordon and Breach (1993) Potthoff, J. and Sundar, P.: Law of large numbers and central limit theorem for Donsker's delta function of diffusions I; Potential Analysis 5 (1996) 487504 Potthoff, J. and Timpel, M.: On a dual pair of spaces of random variables; Potential Analysis 4 (1995) 637-654 Potthoff, J., Vage, G., and Watanabe, H.: Generalized solutions of linear parabolic stochastic partial differential equations; Appl. Math. Optimization 38 (1998) 95-107
34 [429] Potthoff, J. and Yan, J. A.: Some results about test and generalized funct i o n a l of white noise; Probability Theory, L. H. Y. Chen et al. (eds.) (1992) 121-145, Walter de Gruyter & Co. [430] Redfern, M.: White noise approach to multiparameter stochastic integration; J. Multivariate Analysis 3 7 (1991) 1-23 [431] Redfern, M.: Stochastic integration via white noise and the fundamental theorem of calculus; Stochastic analysis on infinite dimensional spaces, H. Kunita and H.-H. Kuo (eds.), Longman House, (1994) 255-263 [432] Redfern, M.: Two-parameter Stratonovich integrals; Dynam. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Systems 5 (1999) 251-259 [433] Redfern, M.: Stochastic differentiation - a generalized approach; Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 6 3 (2000) 349-361 [434] Redfern, M.: Complex white noise analysis; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 4 (2001) 1-29 [435] Redfern, M. and Betounes, D.: A generalized Ito formula for iV-dimensional time; in: White Noise Analysis, World Scientific (1990) 337-343 [436] Saito, K.: Ito's formula and Levy's Laplacian; Nagoya Math. J. 108 (1987) 67-76 [437] Saito, K.: Levy's Laplacian in the infinitesimal generator; Research Report, Meijo Univ. 28 (1988) 1-5 [438] Saito, K.: A computation of the Feynman integral in terms of complex white noise; Research Reports of the Faculty of Science and Technology, Meijo University 30 (1990) 13-18 [439] Saito, K.: Ito's formula and Levy's Laplacian II; Nagoya Math. J. 123 (1991) 153-169 [440] Saito, K.: On a construction of a space of generalized functions; Proc. PIC on Gaussian Random Fields, Part 2 (1991) 20-26 [441] Saito, K.: A group generated by t h e Levy Laplacian and the Fourier-Mehler transform; Pitman Research Notes in Math. Series 3 1 0 (1994) 274-288, Longman Scientific & Technical [442] Saito, K.: A group generated by t h e Levy Laplacian; RIMS Kokyuroku 8 7 4 (1994) 192-201 [443] Saito, K.: T h e Levy Laplacian acting on Hida distributions; Proc. Applied Math. 5 (1996) 30-44 [444] Saito, K.: The Fourier-Mehler transform and the Levy Laplacian; Infinite Dimensional Harmonic Analysis 1 D . + M . Grabner (1996) 195-208 [445] Saito, K.: Transformations approximating a group generated by the Levy Laplacian; RIMS Kokyuroku (1996) 214-224 [446] Saito, K.: A (C 0 )-group generated by the Levy Laplacian; Journal of Stochastic Analysis and Applications 16 (1998) 567-584 [447] Saito, K.: A (C 0 )-group generated by the Levy Laplacian II; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 1 (1998) 425-437 [448] Saito, K.: The Levy Laplacian and Stochastic Processes; Infinite Dimensional Harmonic Analysis 2, D . + M . Grabner (1999) 306-318 [449] Saito, K.: Infinite dimensional stochastic processes generated by extensions of the Levy Laplacian; Publication of Centra Vito Volterra, Universita Degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata" 4 2 8 (2000) 1-12
35 [450] Saito, K.: T h e Levy Laplacian and Stochastic Processes; RIMS Kokyuroku 1 1 5 7 (2000) 101-114 [451] Saito, K.: The Levy Laplacian and stable processes; in: Chaos, Solitons & Fractals/ Les Treilles Special Issue, International Solvay Institute (2001) [452] Saito, K.: A stochastic process generated by the Levy Laplacian; Acta Appl. Math. (2001) [453] Saito, K., and Tsoi, A. H.: T h e Levy Laplacian as a self-adjoint operator; Quantum Information, World Scientific (1999) 159-171 [454] Saito, K., and Tsoi, A. H.: T h e Levy Laplacian acting on Poisson noise functionals; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 2 (1999) 503-510 [455] Saito, K., and Tsoi, A. H.: Stochastic processes generated by functions of the Levy Laplacian; in: Quantum Information II, World Scientific (2000) 183-194 [456] Shieh, N. R. and Yokoi, Y.: Positivity of Donsker's delta function; White Noise Analysis-Mathematics and Applications, T. Hida et al. (eds.) (1990) 374-382, World Scientific [457] Si Si: A note on Levy's Brownian motion II; Nagoya Math. J. 1 1 4 (1988) 166^172 [458] Si Si: Variational calculus for Levy's Brownian motion; Gaussian Random Fields, K. Ito and T. Hida (eds.) (1991) 364-373, World Scientific [459] Si Si: Innovation Approach to Levy's Brownian motion; Proc. Preseminar for International Conference on Gaussian Random fields, P a r t 2 (1991) 27-33 [460] Si Si: Integrability condition for stochastic variational equation; Volterra Center Publications, # 2 1 7 (1995) [461] Si Si: Innovation of some random fields; J. Korean Math. Soc. 35 (1998) 793-802. [462] Si Si: A variation formula for some random fields, an analogy of Ito's formula; Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 2 (1999) 305-313 [463] Si Si: Historical view and some development of variational calculus applicable to random fields; Volterra Center Publications, # 3 7 9 (1999) [464] Si Si: Topics on random fields; Quantum Information I, T. Hida et al. (eds.), World Scientific, (1999) 179-194 [465] Si Si: Gaussian processes and Gaussian random fields; Quantum Information II, T. Hida et al. (eds.), World Scientific (2000) 195-204 [466] Si Si: Random fields and multiple Markov properties; Supplementary Papers for Unconventional Model of Computation UMC2K, Solvay Institute, I. Antoniou et al. (eds.) (2000) 64-70 [467] Si Si: Random irreversible phenomena, entropy in subordination; Chaos, Solitons & Fractals (Special issue) I. Prigogine et al. (eds.) (2001) [468] Si Si: Entropy in subordination and filtering; Recent Developments in Infinite Dimensional Analysis and Quantum Probability, L. Accardi et al. (eds.) (2001) [469] Si Si: White noise approach to random fields; Proc. Summer School on White Noise Approach to Classical and Quantum Stochastic Calculi, L. Accardi (ed.), World Scientific (2001) [470] Si Si: Representations and transformations of Gaussian random fields; Quantum Information III, T. Hida et al. (eds.), World Scientific (2001)
36 [471] Silva, J. L., Kondratiev, Yu. G., and Streit, L.: Representation of diffeomorphisms on compound Poisson space; in: Analysis on Infinite-dimensional Lie Groups and Algebras (1998) 376-393, World Scientific [472] Skorokhod, A. V.: On a generalization of a stochastic integral; Theory Probab. Appl. 20 (1975) 219-233 [473] Stan, A.: Paley-Wiener theorem for white noise analysis; J. Funct. Anal. 173 (2000) 308-327 [474] Streit, L.: Gaussian processes and simple model field theories; in: Proc. XII. Winter School for Theoretical Physics, Karpacz, 1975 [475] Streit, L.: T h e construction of quantum field theories; in: Uncertainty Principle and Foundations of Quantum Mechanics - A Fifty Years Survey, S. S. Chissick (ed.), London, 1976 [476] Streit, L.: White noise analysis and the Feynman integral; in: Functional Integration, Theory and Application, J. P. Antoine and E. Tirapegui (eds.) Plenum (1980) 43-52 [477] Streit, L.: Energy forms, Schroedinger theory, processes; Phys. Reports 77 (1981) 363 [478] Streit, L.: Stochastic processes - quantum physics; Acta Physica Austriaca Suppl., XXVI (1984) 3 [479] Streit, L.: Q u a n t u m theory and stochastic processes - Some contact points; XV. Con}. Stock. Proc. Appl., Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1 2 0 3 (1985) 197 [480] Streit, L.: Energy forms in terms of white noise; in: Stochastic, Algebra and Analysis in Classical and Quantum Dynamics, S. Albeverio et al. (eds.), Kluwer (1990) 255-233 [481] Streit, L.: White noise analysis and quantum field theory; Lecture Notes in Physics 3 5 5 (1990) 287-298 [482] Streit, L.: The characterization theorem for Hida distributions, generalizations and applications; UMa-Mat 3/91 and in: Proc. III. Int. Conf. Stock. Proc, Physics and Geometry [483] Streit, L.: White noise analysis - theory and applications; Qu. Prob. Rel. Topics, VII (1992) 337-347 [484] Streit, L.: T h e Feynman integral - recent results; in: Dynamics of Complex and Irregular Systems, Ph. Blanchard et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1993) 166-173 [485] Streit, L.: A new look at functional integration; in: Advances in Dynamical Systems and Quantum Physics, (1993) 307-325, World Scientific [486] Streit, L.: White noise analysis and functional integrals; in: Mathematical Approach to Fluctuations, T. Hida (ed.), World Scientific [487] Streit, L.: An Introduction to white noise analysis; in: Stochastic Analysis and Applications in Physics, A. I. Cardoso et al. (eds.), Kluwer (1994) 4 1 5 439 [488] Streit, L.: Hida distributions and more; in: Mathematical Approach to Fluctuations 2, T. Hida (ed.), World Scientific [489] Streit, L.: The Feynman integral - answers and questions; in: Proc. 1st Jagan Intl. Workshop on Adv. in Theor. Physics, Central Visayan Inst. (1996) 188199
37 Streit, L.: Representations of diffeomorphisms on compound Poisson spaces; in: Analysis on Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras and Groups, H. Heyer and J. Marion (eds.), (1998) World Scientific Streit, L. and Hida T.: Generalized Brownian functionals and the Feynman integral; Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 16 (1983) 55—69 Streit, L. and Hida, T.: White noise analysis and its applications to Feynman integral; Proc. Conf. Measure Theory and its applications, Lecture Notes in Math. 1 0 3 3 (1983) 219-226 Streit, L. and Westerkamp, W.: A generalization of the characterization theorem for generalized functions of white noise; in: Dynamics of Complex and Irregular Systems P h . Blanchard et al. (eds.), World Scientific (1993) 174-187 Takenaka, S.: On projective invariance of multi-parameter Brownian motion; Nagoya Math. J. 6 7 (1977) 89-120 Takenaka, S.: Invitation to white noise calculus; Lecture Notes in Control and Inform. Sci. 4 9 (1983) 249-257 Takenaka, S.: On pathwise projective invariance of Brownian motion. I; Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 64 (1988) 41-44 Takenaka, S.: On pathwise projective invariance of Brownian motion. II; Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 6 4 (1988) 271-274 Takenaka, S.: On pathwise projective invariance of Brownian motion. Ill; Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 66 (1990) 35-38 Timpel, M. and Benth, F. E.: Topological aspects of t h e characterization of Hida distributions - a remark; Stochastic Rep 51 (1994) 293-299. Watanabe, H.: T h e local time of self-intersections of Brownian motions as generalized Brownian functionals; Lett. Math. Phys. 23 (1991) 1-9 Watanabe, H.: Donsker's (5-function and its applications in the theory of white noise analysis; Stochastic Processes, a Festschrift in Honor of G. Kallianpur, S. Cambanis et al. (eds.) (1993) 337-339, Springer-Verlag Yan, J. A.: Sur la transformed de Fourier de H. H. Kuo; Lecture Notes in Math. 1372 (1989) 393-394, Springer-Verlag Yan, J. A.: Inequalities for products of white noise functionals; Stochastic Processes 349—358, Springer 1993 Yan, J. A.: Products and transforms of white-noise functionals (in general setting); Appl. Math. Optim. 31 (1995) 137-153 Yokoi, Y.: Positive generalized Brownian functionals; White Noise Analysis, Mathematics and Applications, World Scientific (1989) 407-422 Yokoi, Y.: Positive generalized white noise functionals; Hiroshima Math. J. 20 (1990) 137-157 Yokoi, Y.: Properties of Gel'fand triplet in white noise analysis and a characterization of Hida distributions; Proc. Preseminar for International Conference on Gaussian Random Fields, P a r t 2 (1991) 34-48 Yokoi, Y.: Simple setting for white noise calculus using Bargmann space and Gauss transform; Hiroshima Mathematical Journal 25 (1995) 97-121 Yokoi, Y.: On continuity of test functionals in infinite-dimensional Bargmann space; Memoirs, Faculty of General Education, Kumamoto University, Natural Sciences 31 (1996) 1-8 Zhang, Y.: The Levy Laplacian and Brownian particles in Hilbert spaces; J. Funct. Anal. 133 (1995) 425-441
This page is intentionally left blank
Quantum Information IV (pp. 39-48) Eds. T. Hida and K. Saito © 2002 World Scientific Publishing Co.
INTEGRAL TRANSFORM AND SEGAL-BARGMANN REPRESENTATION ASSOCIATED TO Q-CHARLIER POLYNOMIALS
NOBUHIRO A S M International Institute for Advanced Studies Kizu, Kyoto 619-0225, Japan. [email protected], [email protected]
Let fip be the g-deformed Poisson measure in the sense of Saitoh-Yoshida 24 and vp be the measure given by Equation (3.6). In this short paper, we introduce the g-deformed analogue of the Segal-Bargmann transform associated with fip . We prove that our Segal-Bargmann transform is a unitary map of L2(ppq)) onto the g-deformed Hardy space 'H2[yq). Moreover, we give the Segal-Bargmann representation of the multiplication operator by x in L2(fip'), which is the sum of the g-creation, g-annihilation, g-number, and scalar operators.
1
Introduction
T h e classical Segal-Bargmann transform in Gaussian analysis yields a unitary m a p of L2 space of the Gaussian measure on M. onto the space of L2 holomorphic functions of the Gaussian measure on C, see papers7,8.is,16,19,25,26 Recently, Accardi-Bozejko 1 showed the existence of a unitary operator between a one-mode interacting Fock space and L2 space of a probability measure on R by making use of t h e basic properties of classical orthogonal polynomials and associated recurrence formulas 1 4 , 2 7 . Inspired by this work, the author 3 has recently extended t h e Segal-Bargmann transform to nonGaussian cases. T h e crucial point is to introduce a coherent s t a t e vector as a kernel function in such a way t h a t a transformed function, which is a holomorphic function on a certain domain in general, becomes a power series expression. Along this line, Asai-Kubo-Kuo 6 have considered the case of the Poisson measure compared with the case of t h e Gaussian measure. However, the case of L2 space of Wigner's semi-circle distributions in free probability theory is beyond their scope. On the other hand, van Leeuwen-Maassen 2 2 considered a transform associated with q deformation of the Gaussian measure 1 0 ' 1 1 ' 1 2 and showed t h a t for a given real number q £ [0,1) it is a unitary m a p of I? space of qr-defomed Gaussian measure onto the g-deformed Hardy space H2(iyq) where vq is given
40 in (3.6). Biane 9 examined the case of q = 0 (Free case). Roughly speaking, their methods do not give the relationship between Szegb-Jacobi parameters and kernel functions for their transforms. As observed in Section 3 and Appendix A, our approach clarifies the relationship between them. In this paper, we shall consider the (/-deformed version of the SegalBargmann transform S (,) associated with (/-deformed Poisson measure, denoted by /ip , in t h e sense of Saitoh-Yoshida 2 4 . As a main result, we shall provide Proposition 4.1, which claims t h a t 5* (,) is a unitary m a p of L2(/j,pq ) onto % 2 (i/ q ). Moreover, in Theorem 4.3 we shall give the representation in H2(vq) of t h e multiplication operator by x in L2(/j,p ), which is the sum of the (/-creation, (/-annihilation, (/-number, and scalar operators. We remark t h a t our representation is compatible with t h a t on the (/-Fock space by SaitohYoshida 2 3 and can be viewed as t h e (/-analogue of the H u d s o n - P a r t h a s a r a t h y 1 7 decomposition of the usual Poisson random variable on the s t a n d a r d Boson Fock space (q = 1). Ito-Kubo 1 8 also studied a similar decomposition in details from the point of white noise calculus 2 0 , 2 1 (For more recent formulation, see papers4'5'13). T h e present article serves a good example to papers by Accardi-Bozejko 1 and Asai 3 . The present paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall the recurrence formula for q-Charlier polynomials. In Section 3, we introduce a (/-deformed coherent state vector and a Segal-Bargmann transform associated to a (/-deformed Poisson measure. In addition, we quickly define the Hardy space as the Segal-Bargmann representation space. In Section 4, our main results are given. In Appendix A, we give some remarks on known results 7 ' 9 ' 2 2 ' 2 5 ' 2 6 related to (/-Hermite polynomials. Notation. Let us recall s t a n d a r d notation from (/-analysis 2 . We put for n 6 No, [n], := 1 + q + • • • + qn~x
with [0], = 0.
Then (/-factorial is naturally defined as [ n ] , ! : = [ l ] , - - - [ n ] , w i t h [ 0 ] , ! = 0. T h e (/-exponential is given by
n=0
l
>q
whose radius of convergence is 1/(1 — q). In addition, another symbol used
41
is the q-analogue of the Pochhammer symbol, ra —1
oo
{a;q)n = J J ( l - a q J ) and {a-q)^ = J J ( l - a g ' ) j=o
3=0
with the convention (a;q)0 = 1. 2
q-deformed Charlier Polynomials
From now on, we always assume that q 6 [0,1) is fixed. Recently, SaitohYoshida24 calculated the explicit form of the g-deformed Poisson measure with a parameter (3 > 0 for q € [0,1). We denote it by /j,pq . The orthogonal polynomials associated to fj,p are the g-Charlier polynomials {C„ (a)} with the Szego-Jacobi parameters an = [n]q + /3,uin = (3[n]q, See papers 23,24 . We also refer the book 14 for the standard Charlier polynomials case (q = 1). Let A = {/3™Hq!}^Lo- The following relations hold for each n > 1: (x - \n]q-(3)C^(x)
= C i t ( x ) +P[n]qC%l1(x)
(2.1)
where CQ = 1, C\q = x — (3. Then, for any L2-convergent decompositions f{x) = J2anCn{x) and g(x) = Y, KCn {x), the inner product (•, •)L2{flM) is given by the form
(2-2)
n
Moreover, let H/H 2 ,,^,,, = E~=o / ^ K ' K I 2 3
Segal-Bargmann Transform and Hardy Space
Let us define the q-deformed coherent state vector for { C „ ( * ) } by E
i>>
*) = E
^
^
z E fl? := {z
€
C : N 2 < ^-q}.
(3.1)
It is easy to see that Ep [x, z) £ L2{/j,pq ) due to
Moreover, it can be shown that {E)9' (x, y)} is linearly independent and total in L2(np).
42
Now we are in a position to introduce our key tool in this paper. Let us sider the g-analogue g-analc consider of the Segal-Bar gmann transform S (,> associated to {Ciq\x)}
given by for any / G L2{^).
( S . w / K z ) = (B%l(x,z),f(x))L2(iit))
(3.3)
Lemma 3.1. Let f £ L2(fj,p ) . Then (S («)/)(z) converges absolutely for all
z e nf. Proof. For f(x) = ^2^L0 anCn
(x), it is quite easy to see oo
By the Schwartz inequality, we get the inequality 00
I 12
n
£K* l
n=0
This shows that the (5 u)/)(z) converges absolutely for all z £ Q^. MP
•
The completion of the space of holomorphic functions F, G on fi^ with respect to the inner product, (F,G)K
= JF\z)G{z)vq{dz),
is nothing but the g-deformed Hardy space 7i2(vq).
vq(dz) = (q;q)00Y,-r-VX?Mz)> j=0 V^'^/j
(3.5) Here vq means that
(3-6)
9 ^ [M), ^ = c j U - f V
where \P.(dz) is the Lebesgue measure on the circle of radious TJ. Lemma 3.2. {z n }£L 0 forms an orthogonal basis ofH2(i/q).
?
43 Proof. We adopt t h e same idea as in t h e proof 22 . (zn,zm)nl=
znzmvq[dz)
f
_
(g; g)oo
-
9J
V">
n+m
2n £j( 9 ;g)/>
f
*
pi(m-n)8M
/„
/3"(g;g)oo^g(ra+1)i
_ ,
= 5 n , m /3"[n] g !. Note t h a t we have used t h e q-Gamma function 2 ' 2 2 , (a- a)
^
0 ("+
1
)i
n Remark. It can be shown by Proposition 4.4 in the recent paper 6 t h a t vq is a unique measure satisfying ( z " , z m ) ^ 2 = SntTn/3n[n]q\. Hence, for any F = ^^L0anzn, product {-,-)-H* i s written as
G = £ ^ = 0 bnzn
E 7i2(uq),
t h e inner
00
(F,G)nl
= J^(3n[n}q\anbn
(3.7)
71 = 0
and t h e corresponding norm of F is 00
ll^ll«> = £ 0 > ] « ! l a » l 2 -
(3-8)
71 = 0
4
Main Results
P r o p o s i t i o n 4 . 1 . 5 (,) is a unitary
map of L2(nP
) onto 7i
{yq).
Proof. As we have seen in L e m m a 3.1, (S,q)cM)(z)
= z".
(4.1)
44 In addition, we derive by L e m m a 3.2, l|Ci' , Hl, ( | .«., ) = l l * - | | a K J = / ' - Therefore, we finish the proof.
•
Let us define operators Zq and Dq in 7i2(vq) ZqF{z)
satisfying
= zF{z).
(4.2)
Dq,pF(z):=m*){i-_FJ}qz)).(z?0)
(4.3)
and Dqif,F(z):=0(z
= 0),
Operators Zq and Dqp play the roles of t h e q-creation operator and qannihilation operator respectively and satisfy the g-deformed commutation relation Dq^Zq — qZqDqp = / . T h e q-number operator acting on H 2 (z/ g ) is defined by NqF{z) In addition, the operator a^
n > 0.
(4.4)
acting on K 2 ( f g ) is defined by
aNqF(z) Remark t h a t a^qF{z) calculation, we have L e m m a 4 . 2 . (1) S
= [n}qF{z),
= ([n], + 0)F{z),
n > 0.
(4.5)
= 0 for ^-Gaussian case, see Appendix A. By the direct U)l
UP
= 1
(2) D, i / 5 z» = (3[n]qz ra-1 (3) Zq n
=
zn+l
T h e transformation of t h e multiplication operator Qp satisfies the following relation. T h e o r e m 4 . 3 . S MQpq) = (Dq,p + Zq + SN)SM Mp
by x in L2(fip
)
Mp
Proof. By t h e recurrence formula (2.1), Equation (4.1) and L e m m a 4.2, we derive (S
= (E^hx^cH,
+ / 3 [ n ] , C < £ 1 + ([n], + / 3 ) C ^ ) i
n Moreover we obtain
45 C o r o l l a r y 4 . 4 . The operators Zq,Dq,Nq,a^ (1) SNq
= \ZqDq#
(2) Zq + Dqfi
+pi
=
have the following
•properties:
Nq+/3I
+ aNq = {-feZq + ytfl)
{-±Dq,p
+ y^J) -
Proof. T h e proof is done by Equations (4.2), (4.3), (4.4), (4.5), and L e m m a 4.2. • Therefore, by Theorem 4.3 and Corollary 4.4, the multiplication operator Q{pq) by x in L2(fj,p ) is represented as the sum of the q-creation, qannihilation, g-number, and scalar operators in the Hardy space %2(yq). In the g-deformed Gaussian case, due to Equation (A.4) in Appendix A, t h e multiplication operator Qg in L 2 (/ii 9 ) is represented as a linear combination of g-creation and q-annihilation operators in t h e "same" Hardy space "H2(vq). Remark, (1) T h e analogous results in this paper to q = 1 have been considered by Asai, et al. 6 . (2) In general, if variances of two given measures fi\ and fi2 are the same, t h e n the actions of creation and annihilation operators are the same. In addition, the transformed function spaces by 5 M l and S^ are also the same. However, if /Uj is non-symmetric and /X2 is symmetric, t h e n the representation of multiplication in L2(fi\) is different from t h a t in L2(fj,2). Appendix A
On q-Hermite Polynomials
First of all, we refer to the p a p e r s 1 2 ' 2 2 and references cited therein for the detailed description of q-Hermite polynomials. For 5 = 1 , see b o o k s 1 4 , 2 1 , 2 7 . Let fig b e the g-deformed Gaussian measure with mean zero and variance j3 > 0. It is well-known t h a t an associated orthogonal polynomial to fig is the g-Hermite polynomial {Hn (x)} with the Szego-Jacobi parameters an = 0,w„ = /3[n] q . In this case the following relations hold for each n > 1: xH^(x) = H^^+fSln^Ux) where H{0g) = 1 and H[q) g(x)
=
Y,KH(nq\x)
= x. Then for any f(x)
(A.l) = £ anH(nq) (x) and
in L 2 ( / 4 ? ) ) , the inner product (•, •) 2 . (,>. is given by the
form
(/>S)L3(/Iu>) = J ] / 3 n [ n ] g !a„b n .
46 Moreover, let H / H ^ , , , , = A q-deformed
Z7=oP>]A«n\2•
coherent state vector E^(x,z)
for {if„ (x)} is defined by
*S(*.*) = E ^ r * " . *enf. n=0
P
n
It can be shown t h a t the set {E^g(x,z) 2
q
and total in L (^ig ').
(A.2)
"
: z G £1^} is linearly independent
T h e g-analogue of the Segal-Bar g m a n n transform S (,)
9)
asso d a t e d to { i f i ( z ) } is given by (S^f)(z)
for any / G L 2 ( ^ ) .
= {E^g(x,z),f(x))L2{^)}
(A.3)
W i t h this transform, we can reproduce t h e same results as for q G [0,1) Theorem III.4 in Leeuwen-Maassen 2 2 and for q — 0 Proposition 1 in Biane 9 . T h a t is, S (,)-transform yields a unitary isomorphism between L 2 (/ig ) and U2{vq)
and S
^Q(9q)
= (D^
+
Z
i )
S
^
(A.4)
where Qg is the multiplication operator by x in L2(fj,g ) . Acknowledgments T h e author is grateful for a Postdoctral Fellowship of the International Instit u t e for Advanced Studies, Kyoto, J a p a n . He also thanks Prof. Bozejko for his comments. References 1. L. Accardi and M. Bozejko, Interacting Fock space and Gaussianization of probability measures. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Q u a n t u m Probability a n d Related Topics, 1 (1998), 663-670. 2. G. E . Andrew, R. Askey and R. Roy, Special Functions. Cambridge, 1999. 3. N. Asai: Analytic characterization of one-mode interacting Fock space. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Q u a n t u m Probability and Related Topics, 4 (2001), 409-415. 4. N. Asai, I. Kubo, and H.-H. Kuo, Roles of log-concavity, log-convexity, and growth order in white noise analysis. Infinite Dimensional Analysis,
47
5.
6.
7. 8. 9.
10. 11.
12.
13.
14. 15.
16.
17. 18. 19.
Q u a n t u m Probability and Related Topics, 4 (2001), 59-84. Universidade da Madeira CCM preprint 37 (1999) N. Asai, I. Kubo, and H.-H. Kuo, General characterization theorems and intrinsic topologies in white noise analysis. Hiroshima M a t h . J., 3 1 (2001), 299-330. LSU preprint (1999) N. Asai, I. Kubo, and H.-H. Kuo, Segal-Bargmann transforms of onemode interacting Fock spaces associated to Gaussian and Poisson measures, preprint (2001), to appear in Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. V. B a r g m a n n , On a Hilbert space of analytic functions and an associated integral transform, I. Comm. P u r e Appl. Math., 14 (1961), 187-214. V. Bargmann, On a Hilbert space of analytic functions and an associated integral transform, II. Comm. P u r e Appl. Math., 2 0 (1967), 1-101. P. Biane, Segal-Bargmann transform, functional calculus on matrix spaces and the theory of semi-circular and circular systems. J. Funct. Anal., 1 4 4 (1997), 232-286. M. Bozejko and R. Speicher, An example of a generalized Brownian motion I. Comm. M a t h . Phys., 1 3 7 (1991), 519-531. M. Bozejko and R. Speicher, An example of a generalized Brownian motion II. in Q u a n t u m Probability and Related Topics VII, L. Accardi (ed.) World Scientific, 1992, pp. 67-77. M. Bozejko, B. Kummerer and R. Speicher, q-Gaussian processes: Noncommutative and classical aspects. Comm. M a t h . Phys., 1 8 5 (1997), 129-154. W. G. Cochran, H.-H. Kuo, and A. Sengupta, A new class of white noise generalized functions. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Q u a n t u m Probability and Related Topics, 1 (1998), 43-67. T. S. Chihara, An Introduction to Orthogonal Polynomials. Gordon and Breach, 1978. T. Dwyer, Partial differential equations in Fischer-Fock spaces for Hilbert-Schmidt holomorphy type. Bull. Amer. M a t h . Soc. 7 7 (1971), 725-730 L. Gross P. and Malliavin, Hall's transform and the Segal-Bargmann map. in: Ito's Stochastic Calculus and Probability Theory, M. Fukushima et al. (eds.) Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 73-116. R. L. Hudson and K. R. Parthasarathy, Quantum Ito's formula and stochastic evolutions. Comm. M a t h . Phys., 9 3 (1984), 301-323. Y. Ito and I. Kubo, Calculus on Gaussian and Poisson white noises. Nagoya M a t h . J., I l l (1988), 41-84. I. K u b o and H.-H. Kuo, Finite dimensional Hida distributions. J. Funct. A n a l , 1 2 8 (1995), 1-47.
48 20. I. K u b o and S. Takenaka, Calculus on Gaussian white noise I, II, III, IV; Proc. Japan Acad. 5 6 A (1980) 376-380, 5 6 A (1980) 411-416, 5 7 A (1981) 433-437, 5 8 A (1982) 186-189. 21. H.-H. Kuo, White Noise Distribution Theory. CRC Press, 1996. 22. H. van Leeuwen and H. Maassen, A q deformation of the Gauss distribution. J. M a t h . Phys., 36 (1995), 4743-4756. 23. N. Saitoh and H. Yoshida, The q-deformed Poisson random variables on the q-Fock space. J. M a t h . Phys., 4 1 (2000), 5767-5772. 24. N. Saitoh and H. Yoshida, The q-deformed Poisson distribution based on orthogonal polynomials. J. Phys. A: Gen., 3 3 (2000), 1435-1444. 25. I. E. Segal, Mathematical characterization of the physical vacuum for a linear Bose-Einstein field. Illinois J. Math., 6 (1962), 500-523. 26. I. E. Segal, The complex wave representation of the free Boson field, in: Essays Dedicated to M. G. Krein on t h e Occassion of His 70th Birthday, Advances in Math.: Supplementary Studies Vol.3, I. Goldberg and M. Kac (eds.) Academic, 1978, pp. 321-344. 27. M. Szego, Orthogonal Polynomials. Coll. Publ. 2 3 , Amer. Math. S o c , 1975. 28. D. Voiculescu, K. J. Dykema and A. Nica, Free Rondom Variables. C R M Monograph Ser. 1, Amer. M a t h . S o c , 1992.
Quantum Information IV (pp. 49-78) Eds. T. Hida and K. Saito © 2002 World Scientific Publishing Co.
N O T I O N S OF I N D E P E N D E N C E IN ALGEBRAIC PROBABILITY THEORY A N D SET PARTITION STATISTICS
YUKIHIRO HASHIMOTO * Graduate
School of Mathematics, Nagoya University Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan
A non-commutative analogy of the combinatorial probability theory is studied. We investigate roles of singletons in the set partition statistics which appear in the non-commutative probability theory, and introduce general notions of statistical independence. To clarify structures of the set partition statistics, we introduce an idea of non-commutative decomposition of discrete random walks, which is a sort of discrete time analogy of Quantum Ito theory.
1
Singleton condition and set partition statistics
An algebraic probability space (.A, ip) is a pair of a *-algebra A and a state
m
•
(1) £ N
with an index ns different from all other ones. Here &«/ stands for the omission of o„ s . *JSPS RESEARCH FELLOW
50 (2) A stochastic process {Jn} is said t o satisfy t h e singleton respect to ip if t h e factorization
condition
with
• V (Jni(b(1))
• • • Jn,(b{3))
• • • Jnm(b{Tn)))
(2)
holds for any choice of b^\ ... , 6 * m ' £ B, and n\, • • • , n m £ N with an index ns different from all other ones. (3) We say sequences (a„ )^L 1 , (a„ ) , . . . of elements of A satisfy t h e condition of boundedness of the mixed momenta if for each m E N and ji, • • • ,jm there exists a positive constant Bm(ji,... ,jm) > 0 such t h a t
K a ^---^rOI- B m ( i l '---' i m )
(3)
for any choice of n j , . . . , nTO £ N . Note t h a t by setting a„ :— Jn{b^'), (1), while t h e converse is false.
the singleton condition for Jn implies
For a sequence aS*> = (a„ )^Lj C A, we p u t
S„(a«>) = £ > « > .
(4)
n=l
We shall discuss t h e partition statistics associated with {Sjv( a scribing t h e mixed momenta of S J V ( O " ' ) ' S
N<*
'''
J\[a
J'
)}• For de-
( >
we introduce t h e following notations. N o t a t i o n 2 For m £ N , we define a set of equivalent classes P(m)
= {(W1,...,Wm)\l<Wi<
m}/6m
where (W1,W2,..., Wm) ~ (W[,W'2,..., W'm) if and only if there exists a p e r m u t a t i o n 9 E G m satisfying 6(Wi) = W'{. \W\ ... Wm] stands for an equivalent class. For T = \W\ • • • Wm\ £ P(m), c(T) denotes t h e number of alphabets in T different from each other, t h a t is, c(T) \— #{Wi,..., WVn}Then we may take a m a p p : { l , . . . , m } —» { 1 , . . . , c(T)} characterized by p(j) = P{k) if and only if Wj = Wk, which give rise to a partition J J ^ l j Sj of t h e set { l , . . . , m } by putting Sj := {fc | p(k) — j}. Since there is an ambiguity on t h e suffix of Sj, we choose t h e m a p p uniquely determined by
51 t h e property mm Sj < minS*. if and only if j < k. PP{2m) denotes the set of equivalent classes with length 2m which consist of m-pairs, t h a t is, the set of all pair-partitions ]J"L1 Sj of the set { 1 , . . . , 2 m } , #Sj = 2 for j = 1 , . . . , m . For an m-tuple (ni,..., nm) £ N m , we construct a m a p p' : { 1 , . . . , m} —> { 1 , . . . , m } defined by p'(j) = min{fc | n*. = rij}, which has a property p'{j) = p'(fc) if and only if rij = n*.. Then we associate an equivalent class T = [p'(l) • • • p'(m)] to each m-tuple ( n i , . . . , n m ) , denoting T = [ ( n 1 ; . . . ,n TO )] for short. We put for T £ P(m), TN = {(n1,...,nm)&{l,...,N}m 2
\
[(nu...,nm)]=T}.
L a w of large n u m b e r s , c e n t r a l l i m i t t h e o r e m s a n d e n t a n g l e d ergodicity
One can deduce some fundamental results from the singleton condition. Here we just mention the results and omit the proofs. See Accardi-HashimotoO b a t a 2 ' 3 for details. L e m m a 3 2 ' 3 Let (<x„ ) ^ i , (a„ ) ^ L l 5 . . • be sequences of elements of A satisfying the condition of boundedness of the mixed momenta. Then, for any 0
lim -J—
fU^)---a{^))
Y
=0
(6)
(ni,...,nm)6TN
holds provided that c(T) <
am.
2,s
Lemma 4 Let {(ajj ) " = 1 } be sequences of elements A with mean
ip
—
•••
—
(ii) In the case of a = 1/2 and m = 2p, h m ip '
JV-+00 NP TePP(2p)
(n 1 ,...,nj,)eT J V
0.
(7)
52 holds in the sense that one limit exists if and only if the other does and the limits coincide. Moreover, the following Gaussian bound takes place: lim sup
5jv(a(il))
SV(a(i2p))
< ^ B
2 p
.
(9)
JV->oo
D e f i n i t i o n 5 5 A discrete stochastic process Jn : B —} A is said to be weakly stationary with respect to tp if the distribution tp = tpoJn is determined independent of n. T h e following is a non-commutative version of t h e law of large numbers. T h e o r e m 6 5 Let (A, (p) be an algebraic probability space and Jn : B —» A be a stochastic process. Suppose that {Jn} *s weakly stationary and satisfies the singleton condition (2) with respect to
,™,(P(M^1 where a „
n1,...,nmGN
non-commutative
(10)
polynomial P
M p ) ) = w < . > , , . . . , « (11)
= «/„(&"') and tp ~ ip o Jn.
In t h e next, we observe t h e n a t u r a l role of t h e non-crossing partitions in the proof of the existence of the limit (8) and show how this naturally leads to t h e idea of entangled ergodicity. D e f i n i t i o n 7 Let U = 1 Sj b e a partition of { 1 , . . . , m) a n d p u t Sj = min{s £ Sj}, Then U j = i Sj other,
ls
called non-crossing
Ui, si) n 5 j = 0
lj = m a x { s £ Sj}. if for any i, j £ { l , . . . , m } distinct each
or (SJ, SJ) n 5i = 0
(12)
holds. Here (a, b) stands for the set {a, a + 1 , . . . , b}. T h e block Sj is called a non-crossing block of a partition if (12) holds for any S{, i ^ j . T h e partition I I j = i Sj is called totally crossing if there is no non-crossing block.
53 Suppose t h a t the process {J„} satisfies the singleton condition. Then, for non-crossing pair partition T = ]]^=i{hk, Ik} 6 PP(2p), the factorization property (2) shows t h a t t h e limit
JT^
E
(13)
(n1,...,n,p)eTN
is reduced to t h e limit of usual ergodic average:
,&, * (h t J-^(fcl,6(,i))) •••*{*£
J hp)b{lp))
^
) •
However, due to the non-commutativity we need the existence of the limit for entangled partitions. D e f i n i t i o n 8 2 ' 3 A process { J n } is said to have t h e property of entangled ergodicity with respect to tp if for any m € N , any choice of fe'1',..., b^m' G B and any totally crossing partition T £ P{m), c(T) > 2, t h e limit
,£LNm
T, («l
(H)
nm)GTJV
exists.
T h e o r e m 9 ' Suppose that a process {J n } satisfies the singleton condition. Let (b^) be a sequence ofB with ip{Jn(bU))) = 0 for any n and j , satisfying uniformly bounded condition (10). Put a„ := J „ ( 6 ' J ' ) . Suppose that the mean
covariance lim 1 N—Kx> i v
exists for any i,j.
Then the
f>(Jn(6W6<>)))
(15)
z — ' n=l
limit
b,f«...«)
(16)
exists if and only if {Jn} satisfies the entangled ergodicity. C o r o l l a r y 1 0 2 ' 3 Suppose that a process {Jn} satisfies the singleton condition. Let (b^>) be a sequence of B with
relations) for each i,j 6 N , i ^ j , there exists a complex
number qij such that a\^'a„
= qijOn'am
for
any m,n
£ N;
54 (ii)
(symmetry)
v(«{j)-aLJi:,) = *'(«gi)-«fei,). holds for any injection
(17)
6 : N —» N ,
(Hi) (pair partition freeness)
Set partition statistics on discrete groups
Let G be a discrete group generated by £ : = {
+ ...+
7r(CTjv)).
Note t h a t a family of subsets £ W := {
= lim 4>(S%)
55
lim
—•==-—
>
d>(o-i,ai
Kz,
= lim
*
im
#TN.
V
n->oo C\//V1TO
^
We call { M m } combinatorial moments. Let A& be a fc x fc-matrix given by (Afc)ij = Mi+j, 0
<
(18)
then there exists a unique distribution p.G on real line of which moments coincide with {Mm}. For a word (cr^, • • • ,cr i m ) e S TO , we define a m a p p : { l , . . . , m } —> { 1 , . . . , m } by p(j) = min{fc | i*. = ij}. Note t h a t p ( j ) = p{k) if and only if ij = ifc. Then we associate an equivalent class T = [p(l) • • • p(m)] to each word ( u i j , . . . , <J;m). We use an abbreviation T = [cr^ • • • o~im]. If a product o"ij • • • <7;m is reduced to the unit e, we say the word (ff^,...,
then X satisfies the singleton
condition
PROOF. If a product a^---aik includes a singleton u ^ , we have °»i ' ' ' °~ik T^ e - Otherwise we have o~is = o~itl • • • er^ •
^
_ *
T&Pa(m)
\V1S
# T w
(19)
>
T h e o r e m 1 4 7 Let G be a discrete group generated by symmetric minimal generators {o~i}. Then all combinatorial moments Mm exist and are given by M2m
= #PPG(2m)
and M2m+1
= 0.
(20)
56 P R O O F . Take a closed word ( t r ; , , . . . , o-im), t h e n 0 ( 0 ^ • • • a ; m ) = 1 holds. Since S is minimal, it follows from L e m m a 4 and the symmetry assumption t h a t for odd m we have M m = 0, a n d for even m = 2p t h e right h a n d side of (19) equals to
J™,
n->oo
E
±W» = #PPa{2P).
•<—' A^P T€i>P 0 (2p)
Here are two typical results in algebraic probability theory. • Let A be a direct sum of Z / 2 Z with minimal symmetric generators: A = © t ^ 1 Z / 2 Z e i . It is easy to see t h a t PPA(2m) = PP(2m), and hence (2m)' M 2 m = ^— -^ 2mm!
and M 2 m + 1 = 0.
Then the central limit distribution for (A, {e;}) under the vacuum state
=
1 _i J .—e 2 1 dx. \j2ir
• Let F be a free product of Z / 2 Z , F = * ^ = 1 Z / 2 Z / i . It is shown t h a t P P i r ( 2 m ) is a set of non-crossing pair partitions of { l , . . . , 2 m } , and hence M 2 m = #PPF(2m)
=
^ } and M 2 m + 1 = 0. (771 + l)!m!
(See e.g. 1 4 .) Then t h e central limit distribution for (F,{f{}) under the vacuum state
dfiF(x)
We shall discuss these examples again in section 8.1 from the viewpoint of distance regular graphs. Here we only note t h a t these examples are extremal in the discrete group category. T h e o r e m 1 5 7 ' 4 Let G be a discrete group generated by symmetric minimal generators {<X;}. Then the moments of limit distribution satisfy
(2m)!
<M ! m ( G ,K},<S' ~ 2 m\
(m + l)!m! ~ Therefore condition.
the sequence
{Mm(G,
v
L
J
{&{})} satisfies
m
the Carleman's
<»U uniqueness
57 P R O O F . By t h e universal property of free groups, there exists a canonical surjection IT : (F, {/<})-* (G, S ) with n(fi) = a{. T h e n P P F ( 2 m ) C PPG(2m) holds for all m , hence ( 2 m ) ! / ( m + l)!m! = # P P F ( 2 m ) < # P P G ( 2 m ) = A^2m(G). On t h e other hand, P P o ( 2 m ) is a subset of P P ( 2 m ) a n d one sees # P P ( 2 m ) = ( 2 m ) ! / 2 m m ! . Hence t h e inequality follows. Since t h e moments { ( 2 m ) ! / 2 m ! m ! } fulfill t h e condition (18), t h e rest of t h e assertion follows. | Remarks. (1) T h e results in this section are valid with slight modification in case where all generators are of order more t h a n 2 (cf. Hashimoto 7 ). In t h a t case, one needs to consider { S V } a s
SN =
7ilv ( 7 r ( C T l ) + 7r(ffl"1) + "'+ *^ x
+ 7r(a 1))
^ -
1
Then a 'pair' in a product means t h a t a\ • • • a^" is given by ( c i p , o^*) with ip = iq and ep = — eq. T h e free abelian group A = © ^ Z and t h e free group F = *°°Z play t h e same extremal role as stated in T h e o r e m 15. (2) T h e concept of minimal generator is extended t o t h e category of monoids, see Accardi-Hashimoto-Obata 4 for details. (3) Lu 1 5 ' 1 6 a n d M u r a k i 1 7 independently introduced a new notion of independence in algebraic probability theory, called chronological or monotone independence, where t h e symmetric condition on 'generators' breaks down. T h e n we fail to apply our result to a sequence of monotone independent random variables. Indeed, the limit distribution associated with a sum of monotone independent random variables with respect to a vacuum state coincides with t h e arcsine distribution, of which combinatorial moments are determined by a certain set of pair partitions which have much smaller cardinality t h a n t h e set of non-crossing pair partitions. (4) In general, we face h a r d combinatorial problems to determine combinatorial moments associated with (G, {c;}). If we construct a suitable space on which G acts, there is a possibility to determine combinatorial moments by observing t h e action of G. We illustrate such a m e t h o d in the following example. We forget t h e order 2 assumption on generators here. For a fixed k G N , let A/"'fc' be the normal subgroup of infinite free group F = *ZtZfi generated by {(fhfl2 • • • A i ) f e i + 1 | i , i i G N } . We p u t (fc) (fc) 6 = F/jV a n d n = fiNik). We note t h a t t h e infinite p e r m u t a t i o n group Soo is a factor group of 6 ^ .
58 P r o p o s i t i o n 16
7
The generators
{T^} are symmetric
PPeW{2m)
=
Then, the central limit distribution with the normalized
semi-circle
and minimal,
and
PPF{2m).
associated
with ( © ' * ' , {i\})
coincide
law.
P R O O F . Let X b e a discrete space {0} U Z x {1, 2 , . . . , fc}. Define the action of Tj's on X by Ti(0) = (i,l),
Ti{i,k)=0,
Ti(i,a)
= (i,a + 1), for 1 < a < k — 1,
Ti{j,a)
= (j,a),
forj^j,
and T^~ 's on X inverse way. We see t h a t (T^TY, • • • Til)kl+1 acts on X identically for every / G N . Then t h e action of ©(*' on X is well defined. Suppose r / 1 • • • rf" = e and t h a t 7V is a singleton. Then r ? 1 • • • T?"'1 and T*"* 1 •••?£* leave (* p ,a) fixed, while T*" changes (i p , a ) . This is a contradiction. Hence the minimality of {TY} follows. By Theorem 14 we focus on a closed word (r,? 1 , • • •, T'*™ ) belongs to a pair partition. Choose a pair (TY , r t - s ) (p < g), i.e., r : = i p = iq and e q = —e p , such t h a t Tip+1,..., Ti , are different each other. We assume eq = 1 without losing generality. Then we have T"' • • • Tiq(r,k) — (iq-i, 1) and it follows t h a t
whenever q ^ p+1. By t h e assumption r ? 1 • • • Tpm = e, we need q = p + 1 . Repeat this argument, then we see t h a t the closed word ( T ? 1 , • • • ,T t £2m ) forms a non-crossing pair partition, and hence the assertion follows. | In the argument above, the action of S^ fc ' on X is used to exclude all kinds of pair partitions except non-crossing ones. This method is useful to determine t h e moments. 4
Singleton independence
Motivated by the study of central limit theorem for the Haagerup states on free groups 8 , we introduce an analytic generalization of the singleton condition as follows.
59 D e f i n i t i o n 1 7 2<3 Let A b e a *-algebra and let (a„ )™=1 b e sequences of A. Assume t h a t we are given a family of states y>7, 7 > 0, on A. T h e sequences (a„ ) is called singleton independent with respect to
l^(^ ) ---^r ) )l<^|^(^; , )|-|^(^ 1 l) ---^; ) ---^r ) )|
(22)
holds whenever n s is a singleton for {n\,... ,nm). An algebraic r a n d o m process Jn : B —t A is called singleton independent with respect to ip1 if for any m £ N and any choice of b^n\ .. . ,b^Jm' £ B, there exists a constant Cm := Cm(b^l\..., 6 ( j - ' ) > 0 such t h a t (22) holds for a„ : = J n ( & ^ ) whenever n s is a singleton for ( n x , . . . ,nm). We assume t h a t there exist constant numbers (3 > 0, n > 0 and A > 0 such t h a t sup \Vy(a^)\
< / •
(23)
j'.nSN
Then in the case of 7 = 0, the condition (22) is reduced to the singleton condition. (Here we put 0° = 1.) Our goal is to study the partition statistics in t h e limit associated with mixed m o m e n t a
= &,Wz;
E TeP(m)
where j(N)
W)(< ) -"-£ ) )'
E
is a function of N satisfying lira -y(N)NK
= X.
(25)
L e m m a 18 Let s(T) denote the number of singletons P{rn). It holds that for any partition T £ P(rn),
in the partition
m + s(T)>2c{T),
For a partition T = L I ^ Sj £ P(m),
T £ (26)
and the equality holds if and only if T consists of pairs and PROOF.
(24)
(n1,...,Tim)€TJV
singletons.
we have
c(T)
™ = E *si = S(T) + E 3=1
*Si ^ 2«T) -
#Sj>2
T h e equality holds if and only if # 5 j = 2 for all j .
I
60 L e m m a 19 Suppose that sequences (an ) satisfy the condition of boundedness of mixed momenta (3) uniformly on 7, and are singleton independent. If a partition T £ P(m) satisfies (27)
am + (3Ks(T) > c(T) then we have the
limit 1
tLN^ PROOF. inequality
T h e boundedness (3) and repeated application of (22) yields an
where Dm : = Bm_s^CmCm^1
N°
*7<*)(°ii , -«& ) )=°-
£
(nlt...,nm)eTN
• • • C m „ s ( T ) + 1 . Hence we have
E (ni
^(^•••W)
< Dr
nm)€Tjv
\^T\c{T))\( N<*m+pKs(T)
N \c(T)J'
T h e assertion then follows from the condition (27). From Lemmas 18 and 19, we see t h a t a partition T £ P(m), tributes to the limit (24) if the inequality am
+ (3KS(T)
< c(T)
< -(m
+
m > 0, con-
s(T))
holds. ,U) ) satisfies the boundedness condition (3) Suppose t h a t t h e sequence (a„ uniformly on 7 and
(ni,...,nm)€TAr |c(si) . . .
< C
m
— o«
• • • (7m_s_|_i -
a+l|c (
c
(s»)
J\[am. s
i ) . . . >
AT
•7(<sc(r)!^(r)J|^(^(T')| A^c(T)! ( * \ I JSJam+pKs \ C ( T )
y { N ) { r )
\
(28)
61
Here we put
+ (3KS{T)
(29)
holds. Only the partition that holds the equality in (29) contribute to the limit. Suppose that m = 2p > 0 and take a partition T £ PP(2p). Then c(T) = p and s(T) - 0. It follows from (29) that a > 1/2. Suppose that a partition T e P(m) holds the equality in (29). It follows from Lemma 18 and a > 1/2 that 0 < ( i - a)m + ( 1 -
< (^ - /3«) a (T).
/3K)S(T)
(30)
Suppose that a > 1/2, then the partition T contains a singleton, that is, s(T) ^ 0, otherwise the inequality (30) breaks down. Thus we have /3K < 1/2. Since s(T) < m, we have 0 < ( - - a)m
+ ( - - (3K)S(T)
< (1 - a - (3K)TTI,
hence a+/3K
(31)
Take a partition T G P{m) with c(T) = s(T) = m. It follows from (29) and (31) that a + /3«= 1. Suppose that a = 1/2. Again take a partition T £ P(m) with c(T) = s(T) = m. From (29) we have j3n > 1/2. If j3n > 1/2, s(T) - 0 holds from (30), and then we see from Lemma 18 that only pair partitions may survive in the limit. Let us consider the converse. Suppose that a > 1/2 and a + (3K = 1. We see that for T € P(m), am + PKs(T) - V1+AH
=
(Q _ ^
m +
( / 3 K - i ) s{T)
>(a + /3K- l)m = 0 since s(T) < m and /3K, < 1/2. Then Lemma 18 shows the inequality (29). The equality in (29) holds if and only if c(T) — s(T) = m. Suppose that a = 1/2 and (3K, > 1/2. Combining with Lemma 18, we have the inequality (29). The equality holds only for the partitions T e P(m) with s(T) = 0 and m — 2c(T), that is, the pair partitions. Finally, suppose that a = (3K = 1/2, Lemma 18 shows (29) and its equality holds only when the partition T consists of pairs and singletons. In summary, we come to the following limit theorem.
62 T h e o r e m 2 0 Assume that sequences (a„ ) C A are singleton independent and satisfy the boundedness condition (3) uniformly, with respect to a family of states ipj, 7 > 0. Let j(N) = \/NK and suppose that for each j there exists C-i' G R such that y> 7 (a„ ) = c^'yP for any n. Then for any m, the mixed moment (24) has non-zero finite limit if one of the followings holds: (i) a+Pn = 1 and a > 1/2. In this case the partition T G P(m) may survive in the limit only if c(T) — s(T) = m, that is, T consists of singletons only. Then the mixed moment (24) of order m is given by
(nu...,nm)ETN
where T E P(m) with c(T) = s(T) = m, that is, the partition singletons only. The moment is bounded from above by
consists of
C1--Cm\c^---c^\X'3m. (ii) a = 1/2 and /3K > 1/2. In this case the partition T G P{m) w a y survive in the limit only if T is a pair partition. The mixed moment (24) of order 2m is given by
^
^
E
E
TePP{2m)
¥W«4i>•••«)•
(ni,...,n, m )eT J V
( m ) a = (3K = 1/2. In this case the partition T G P{in) "rnay survive in the limit only if the all blocks Sj contained in T satisfy # 5 j < 2, that is, the partition consists of pairs and singletons only. The mixed moment (24) of order m is given by
Ji*]^E
E
3=0 TePP[m;s)
E
^,(a£-a£)),
(n 1 ,...,n m )6T A r
where PP(m; s) C P(m) stands for the set of partitions and s singletons. 5
consists of pairs
A limit t h e o r e m on t h e Haagerup states
T h e notion of singleton independence is found in investigation of t h e Haagerup s t a t e on a free group, T h e Haagerup s t a t e is a non-trivial instance t h a t fails to satisfy t h e singleton condition. Here we give a summary of t h e studies 2 ' 3 on combinatorial aspects of t h e Haagerup state.
63 Let F be the free group on countably infinite generators £ = {gn \ n £ Z x } , where gr_n stands for g~*. Denote by AF t h e group *-algebra of F and for each n £ N by An the *-subalgebra generated by {g±n}- For 0 < 7 < 1 we denote by y>7 the Haagerup state defined by
jef,
(32)
where | • | denotes t h e reduced length function, t h a t is, for g = g%- • • • g^™ with | n j | 7^ \n2\ 7^ • • • 7^ | n m | , its length |g| is given by | e i | + • • • + |em|- We set [e| = 0 for the unit e 6 F and 0° = 1. {gn} satisfy t h e singleton condition with respect to tp1 if and only if 7 = 0. In particular, the algebras An are not free independent with respect to <^7, 7 7^ 0. However we have the following. P r o p o s i t i o n 2 1 The sequence {gn | n g Z x } are singleton independent with respect to the Haagerup states tpy, 0 < 7 < 1. In view of t h e reduction gn • g_n = e, we attach a partition T £ P(m) to each index tuple ( o n , . . . , Q m ) in a slightly different way from Notation 2: for an m-tuple ( o ^ , . . . , am) £ ( Z x ) m , the partition T = [|Q 1 ; . . . , am\] £ P(m) is defined by
t=i
j=\
where a3i 7^ — a*, for any 1 < k < m and Sj's are given by the form Sj — {*i,. . . M I | a t l | = • • • = | a t | | and 3p,q such t h a t atp =
-atq}.
T h e factor aSi is called a signed singleton. A signed singleton aSi is said to b e inner if there is a block Sj such t h a t s < Si < SJ (see Definition 7), and is said to be outer if there is no such a block. i(T) and b(T) denote t h e number of inner singletons and the number of blocks which are not signed singletons, respectively. An m-tuple (QJ , . . . , am) is said to be separable at k if there is no block Sj such t h a t s < k < s~j. Note t h a t t h e existence of a n outer singleton Q 3 implies t h e separability at s — 1 and s. D e f i n i t i o n 22 Let NCPI{rn; s) C P(m) be the set of partitions which consist of non-crossing pair partitions and s inner singletons, t h a t is, an element T £ NCPI(ms) is given by
T = ]l{st}]l{p3,qj}, »=i
3=1
where s;'s are inner singletons and U j = 1 { P j , 9 j } forms a non-crossing pair partition.
64 T h e o r e m 23
2 3
'
For T G P(m)
with s inner singletons,
we have
( a 1 , . . . , a m ) € T J V VV^Vj
-A)s,
if
TeNCPI(m;s), (33)
otherwise. Here we put ga = ga — JHence for aN : = (<7±i + • • • + <J±N)/VN, the mixed momenta fx/VN^N '' ' aiV*) w^h £ = ( e i , . .. , e m ) , £{ = ± , in i/ie /imti is given by
YJ(-^Y-*NCPI{m-s]e). Here NCPI(m;s;e) tuple ( a 1 ; . . . , am)
denotes the subset of NCPI(m; s), that consists where the sign of each a^ equals to £{.
of m-
In view of Theorem 23, we construct a representation of the limit process for the Haagerup states on a GNS space. Let oo
oo
8
r(c)„ = c © 0 c " ( = 0 c ) , n=l
V = L,R
n—0
denote two copies of t h e full Fock spaces on C with free creations a+ and free annihilation av. Let ri = © „ n = 0 ^ m , n D e the free product T(C)i * T(C)R, t h a t is, its (m, n)-particle space rim,n is the complex linear span of the vectors {|i/i,.. .,vm+n) I #{j I Vj = L} = TO, # { j I Vj = R} — n} equipped with a scalar product given by {v\,
• • • ,VkWi,
• • • ivi)u
= <5(t/i,...,i/ fc ),(i/(,...,i/ 1 ')-
T h e creation operators L
: = aL
* 1 : rlm,n
~^ rlm+l,n
i
R
: =
1 * aR
'• iim,n
~^ " m , n + l
are given respectively by £ + | " i , •••,"*) = |L,^i,...,^fc),
R+\v!,...,vk)
= li?,!/!,...,^),
and the annihilation operators are given by t h e duals L — (L+)* and R = ( i ? + ) * . Let P : H —> M be t h e orthogonal projection onto H^Q, the subspace orthogonal to Tiofi = C|0), where |0) denotes the vacuum vector. P u t A~ = L+ + R - XP, where A > 0 is a constant.
A\
= L + R+ - XP,
65 T h e o r e m 2 4 2 ' 3 The limit process for (a^,aN, fx/\/N') That is, all its correlations in the limit are given by lirn^
Vv
*s represented on %.
^ ( a * > . . . » « " ) = <*, A ? • • • A'^)u
.
R e m a r k . We have seen t h a t t h e field operator a~^ + a~^ converges in the sense of correlations to A+ + A~ = (L+ + R+) + (L~ + R-) - 2XP. This means t h a t t h e field operator is decomposed into a s u m of 'creation' L+ +R+, 'annihilation' L~ +R~ a n d a function of t h e number operator, —\P. This decomposition leads us naturally to an idea of ' q u a n t u m decomposition' introduced in t h e next section. 6
Q u a n t u m decomposition in a discrete group
We here introduce a new idea of ' q u a n t u m ' decomposition of a graph Laplacian on a Cayley graph associated with a discrete group. To make t h e point clear, we focus on discrete groups satisfying condition (A2) below. More general situations are discussed in section 8.3 a n d 8.4. Let G b e a discrete group equipped with a length function | • | : G —t No : = N U {0} a n d a set of generators S : = {ga \ a 6 Z x } . T h e length of t h e unit e £ G is 0. Throughout this section we adopt t h e convention {g~a = 5 „ J } and assume g-a ^ ga for simplicity. W e say t h a t S is compatible with respect to t h e length function | • | if ( A l ) \ga\ = 1 for any ga € S , (A2) \ga -g\ = \g\±l
for any j
a
e S a n d j e G.
T h e property (A2) leads us t o t h e following idea: we take t h e left regular representation 7r : G -> B(Z 2 (G)). Let Tr(g^) € B(Z 2 (G)) be bounded operators denned by H9a)0g
|
Q ]
otherwise,
*\9a Pg
10>
9\ = \g\-h Qther otherwise .
Here 6g denotes t h e characteristic function of a singlet {g}. Then we have a ' q u a n t u m ' decomposition of ga; T ( S C ) = *(+)+ 7 ^ " ) . We also see t h a t TT( 5 +)* = n{gZa)
a n d \\v{g£)f\\P
(34) < | | / | | | i for / € / 2 ( G ) .
66 A family of subsets S ( J V ) : = {ga \ \a\ = 1 , . . ., N} C £ gives a filtration of G: GW C G<2> C • • • C G, where G<w> is the subgroup generated by tfN\ For each g G G ^ put " f ' ( s ) ••= {(ft,,*) e E<"> x G<"> | * ( , £ ) * . = J 9 } , WL
W)
( 5 ) == {fa,*)
S £
W
x G<"> | n(g-)Sx
= 5g}.
We note t h a t n(g£)6x = Sg implies | 5 | = |as| ± 1 and #J_f\g) + #J_N)'(g) = 2N by assumption (A2). We also note t h a t for t h e unit e 6 G we have w^_ '(e) = 0 and w_ '(e) = E ' ^ ' by definition. W i t h these notations we assume (A3) for each n G N , there exist u „ 6 N and Cn > 0 such t h a t # { 5 € G<"> | H = n and # w f >(<,) /
w„}
< Cn(2iV)"-\
(A4) for each n G N , sup sup #wf](g) JveNgeGt^i.iff^n
=: Wn < oo,
and l i m s u p , , ^ , ^ W v " < oo. (A5) if |p| = n and 5 G G ( J V ) , there exists an n-tuple ( 5 Q I , . . . , p Q „ ) G ( £ W ) n such t h a t <59 = 7 r ( f i ' a 1 ) - - - T ( s f a „ ) ^ -
Canonical examples associated with a free group and a free abelian group are again observed in section 8.1. 7
Interacting Fock spaces associated w i t h a discrete group
For each subgroup G^N\ we construct a one-mode interacting Fock space as follows. See Hashimoto 1 0 for proofs. T h e vacuum vector is defined by |0) := 5e. A vector v G l2(G^N^) is called n-homogeneous if it has a form of v=
Yl
v(g)w(g)\0),
v(g) € C .
(35)
g€GW,\g\=n
D e f i n i t i o n 2 5 (1) Let T„ b e a one-dimensional complex vector space equipped with a pre-scalar product (z\w)W
:= zw{*(n)\*(n))W,
z,weC,
67 where ^ ( n ) } ' ^ ' stands for a number vector defined by
«»»"" := TMT. (v2JV)"
E |g| = n*WW.
ggG(i»),
with (w n )! = WiU}2 • • • U!n. T h e completion of the orthogonal sum ©n{r»i , ( - | ) n } is denoted by T(G^ '), which we call the interacting Fock space associated with G^N\ (2) T h e operators a+N := (n{g±„)
+ ••• + T T ^ ) + n(g+) + •••+
a^ := HgZN)
+ --- + Tr(gZ1)+A9i)
are called asymptotic
creation a n d annihilation
7r(g+N))/
+ --- +
H9N))/^N
operators
respectively.
(3) For A 6 C we define An
I^))W:=E7^1TI*H)(JV,I whenever (£(A)|£(A)) = £ ~ = o | A | 2 " / ( w n ) ! converges. We call | £ ( A ) ) W an asymptotic coherent vector. L e m m a 26 (1) For any
10
n>0,
a^|$(n+l))(JV»=a;„+1|n)W+Un(-i), where vn(Nm) 0{Nm).
is an n-homogeneous
vector
and
such that ||v„(A^ m )||;2 —
(2) For each n > 0 and iV > 1 it holds that
<*(n)|*(n))W = K ) ! + 0 ( l ) . (3) For A £ C m a neighbourhood
a~ |$(0)> = 0,
of 0 me have
1 a ^ | £ ( A ) > W = A | f ( A ) > W + W (l^ ) AT
68 (4) Let v G l3(GW) be an n-homogeneous vector. are respectively (n + 1)- and (n — 1)-homogeneous estimates: \\a+Nv\\2p < 2NWn\\v\\2P,
\\a-v\\2,
Then, a^v and aNv vectors with the norm
<
2NWn\\v\\22.
By virtue of lemma 26 we associate a one-mode interacting Fock space r ( G W ) with parameters {A0 := 1, A n := (w„)!} for each G^ . (See AccardiBozejko 1 for definitions.) Next, we construct an interacting Fock space for the limit of a~^ and a^ as N —> oo. Let T(G) denote the one-mode interacting Fock space with parameters {A0 : = l , A n := (w n )!}. By definition T(G) is the completion of the orthogonal sum of one-dimensional space Tn := C | $ ( n ) ) equipped with a pre-scalar product (z\w)n
:= zw($(n)\$(n)),
z,w £ C ,
where | $ ( n ) ) stands for a number vector with norm \ / A ^ = ^/(u,,)!. creation a+ and annihilation a~ are uniquely determined by a+|$(n)) = |*(n+l)>,
a~\9{n
+ 1)) = w B + i | * ( n ) ) ,
a
The
-|*(0))=0.
For A S C , we define a coherent vector
whenever (£ (A)|£(A)) = ^ ^ _ 0 l ^ | 2 " / ( w n ) ' converges. By definition, it holds t h a t a-\£{\)) = A|£(A)). For u = £ u n | $ ( n ) ) 6 T ( G ) , we put
*<">:= 5>„|*(n))< w )er(G< w >).
(37)
T h e o r e m 27 10Let m > 1 and e j , . . . , e m e { ± } . 77ien, / o r any u 6 T(G) and n 6 No we /iaue w
8
8.1
limJuW|a^...a^|*(n)>W(JV)) = (uK'.-af»|i(n))r(G).
Applications t o limit t h e o r e m s in algebraic probability theory Central limit theorems
on the vacuum
state
Since Theorem 27 is nothing b u t a general form of limit theorems in algebraic probability theory, it particularly leads to the algebraic central limit theorem
69 with respect to t h e vacuum s t a t e (0| • |0):
^ J ° K ^ ^ r | 0 C < " > ) = (^(0)l(«+ +^n*(0))r(G)-
(38)
Let A (resp. F) be a free abelian group (resp. a free group) generated by S : = {ga}, where g~l = g-a according to our convention. Each element g G A (resp. g £ F) has a canonical expression in terms of S: 9 = 9a\
•••Sa™.
where 0 < oti < a 2 < • • • < am, ej 6 Z (resp. \ai\ ^ \a2\ # • • • ^ |a TO |, £i € Z), and a reduced length function is defined by \g\ = |ei| H
h km|-
Conditions (Al)(A2)(A5) are obvious. As for (A3)(A4), we see for g G A (resp. gf G F) with |g| = n > 1, # « V % )
\g\ = n,#J_?\g)
< n} < ( 2 J V ) - 1 ,
2AT - n < #wL W ) (ff) < 2iV - 1, ( resp. # 0 , ^ ( 3 ) = L # « ^ ( f l ) = 2iV - 1). Hence we have w n = n (resp. w n = 1), which implies t h a t t h e interacting Fock space in the limit is the one-mode boson (resp. free) Fock space. 8.2
Limit theorems for Haagerup
states
In this paragraph, we again observe the limit process associated with the Haagerup s t a t e (32). Contrast to Theorem 24, we here give a fully q u a n t u m representation of the limit process. T h e result in Hashimoto 8 was thought as an analogy of a central limit theorem for a vacuum state, though t h e limit distribution h a d peculiar properties. In fact, t h e limit distribution coincides with the free Poisson law 2 3 u p to translation. It is noticeable t h a t limit behaviors of t h e field operators under a vacuum s t a t e are completely described by pair-partition statistics, as is seen in L e m m a 4, while the Poisson laws are induced from all set partition statistics 1 3 ' 2 1 ' 2 0 . Proposition 28 implies t h a t the Haagerup states give rise to a transform of set partition statistics through a coherent state expression of the Haagerup functions. See Hashimoto 1 0 for proofs. We note t h a t for any A G C with |A| < 1 a n d g G F^N\ we have
V^.(s) = (£(A)K(fl)|*(0))S^(N)).
70 It follows from Theorem 27 t h a t the moments of the field operator in the limit are given by
^
((^^) m ) = {£ma+
^
+--n*(0)>r(-)-
(39)
Note t h a t ( $ ( n ) | a + a - | $ ( n ) ) = 1 = ( $ ( 0 ) | P 0 | $ ( 0 ) ) holds for n > 1, where P 0 denotes t h e vacuum projection. P u t t i n g 4>o{A) = ( $ ( 0 ) | J 4 | $ ( 0 ) ) , we have a recurrence formula (S(\)\(a+
+ a - ) m | $ ( 0 ) ) = 0 O ((o+ + a~)m)
(40)
L(m-1)/2J
+
£
0o((a++a-)2i)0o(APo)-(f(A)|(a+ + a-)m-2(-1|$(O)),
1=0
while the expansion of (a+ + a~ + APo) m gives
= (j>{{a+ + a")" 1 )
[(m-l)/2j
+
J2
H(a+ + a~)2l)^Po)
xp
o)m~21'1)-
1=0
By induction we then obtain the following. P r o p o s i t i o n 28 10In the free Fock space {T(F),{Xn
= 1}}, the
identity
m
<£(A)|(o+ + a - n $ ( 0 ) ) r ( F ) = (*(0)|(a+ + a " + A P 0 ) | * ( 0 ) ) r ( F ) holds, where Po is the vacuum Remarks.
projection.
(1) Since in t h e free Fock space the vacuum projection is given by Po = / — a+a~, the r a n d o m variable o + + a~ + APo is nothing b u t the free Poisson one 2 1 , t h a t is,
Q++a-+APo=A+I-(^--L)(v
/
Aa---L).
(2) Proposition 28 describes a Gaussian-Poisson transform in terms of coherent vectors, while Oravecz 1 9 recently introduced a Gaussian-Poisson transform called the T-transform for an arbitrary symmetric measure from t h e viewpoint of orthogonal polynomials. (3) W i t h t h e recurrence formula (40) one obtains a functional identity for the moment generating functions. P u t F(t) = 1 + J^^Li Fmtm with Fm = (£(A)|(a+ + a - ) r a | $ ( 0 ) ) and C(t) = (1 - \/l - 4t2)/2t2, which is
71 the moment generating function of t h e normalized semi-circle law. Then we have t h e identity F(t) = C(t) + XtC(t)F(t), from which the limit distribution is computed easily:
8.3
Multiplication
of free
elements
Proposition 28 implies t h a t under the Haagerup state, SN/V2N = n(gi) + ^ ( s r 1 ) " ! " ' •+ 7r (5'Jv)+ 7r (3Jv 1 ) *s decomposed into a creation a+, an annihilation a~ and conservation a~*~a~ in the limit. In this subsection we present a central limit theorem associated with a multiplication of free elements, and again we obtain the same decomposition as Proposition 28. Let F be a free product of Z / 2 Z , F = *£fLjZ/2Zaj, where cri's are generator of order 2. Note t h a t a^s are free from each other with respect to the vacuum state (0| • |0) in t h e sense of Voiculescu 2 3 . Let us consider a set of products of free elements S 2 : = {wij :— (TiO-j (i ^ j)}, which are not free from each other, and a subgroup F2 C F generated by £2- We use a new length function | • | 2 : F2 —> N 0 with respect to £ 2 different from the one introduced in Section 8.1. Since any product u>i Ul • • • wimjm has a reduced expression in terms of cr;'s, w
where k\ ?k;
i #
••• #
31 • • '
ii
h,
s e e 1for
i
m
• • •
any g =--crkl • • • °~km
Kjsh
j ,„
=
crfcl
• • • CTfc,,
its length is defined by \u>ii i i
Then we occur:
W
-I
w
i
(41)
„iJ2:=l/2£ F2 a n d
wij,
the following three cases
M2 + I, if J ^ h, M 2 - I , if (i,j) = (^2 , * i ) , \g\2,
if j = fci and i ^
(42) k2.
It follows from \wij\2 = 1 and (42) t h a t \g\2 £ N 0 for any E F 2 . T h e existence of the third case is a noticeable difference from our discussions before. Concerning t h e new case, we extend our argument. T h e condition (A2) in Section 6 is replaced to (A2)' \ga • g\ = \g\ or \g\ ± 1 for any ga £ S and g £ G. In accordance with (A2)' we have a ' q u a n t u m ' decomposition of ga: <7a=S++Sa+S°,
(43)
72 where g* are defined by (34) and g°a is given by *U<*>°9
=
/ <W if I
1\ 0,
otherwise. otl
Let us return to the example ( ^ , £ 2 ) . We P u * ^2 j < N}.
F2
denotes the subgroup generated by E 2 w
define J±\g)
F(2N),
by (35) where we take G< > for u < w , ( 5 ) := {(wijt
x) e S f
I 1 < * 7^
. For g £ F2 N)
and wi (g)
we
by
x F 2 W I * ( < £ ) * . = <5J.
By definition, we have u+ '(e) = u>0 '(e) = 0 and u>l unit e S Fi- It is easy to see t h a t for g 6 F2 N, #J+N)(g)
'•— iw'j
(e) = £ 2
(44) for the
with J£jr|2 = n > 1 and for large
= 1, #o,LW)(<7) = (W - I ) 2 and # W < w ) ( f l ) = AT - 2.
Also note t h a t # ^ ( 5 ) + #J_N)(g) + #u(0N\g) = #S< J V ) = N(N According to Section 7, we define a number vector
\y#S
2
7
- 1).
9 eF(^(2),| 9 | 2 =„
and define canonical operators corresponding to the decomposition (43),
where e = ± , o. Then by similar arguments in Section 7, we have a+|$(n))W = |*(„ + l ) > W + t , B + 1 ( l ) , a-N\
=
= \*(n))(»)
\$(n))W+vn(±), + «„(!),
«JV|0)(JV)=a^|0)(JV)=0,
for n > 1, (45)
where vn is a homogeneous vector denned in Section 7, and t h e n we construct an asymptotic one-mode Fock space r(-F 2 ) associated with F2 . Let T(F) b e t h e one-mode free Fock space, a+, a~ and 0° : = PQ be the creation, the annihilation and the vacuum projection respectively, used in the previous subsection. It follows from (45) t h a t we have a ' q u a n t u m ' central limit theorem associated with (F2 , X 2 ' ) as follows.
73 T h e o r e m 2 9 Let m > 1 and e i , . . . , eTO 6 { ± , o } . Then for any u G and n S N o , we /iat>e
lim ( „ ^ ) |
-±L=
-..
- ^ =
^
T(F)
|*(n))<">. =•<">*
"-" ' V v ^ / v^/#sF ^"/'^(F^', = (u|a £ l • • • a £ m | $ ( n ) ) r ( F ) , where we use the notation theorem,
(37). Particularly
l
lim (01 ( ,
Y
we obtain a classical central
-K(Wij)Y\Q)(N\ a°)m\0)T{F).
= (0\(a+ + a~ + 8.4
Anti-commutation
of semi-circular
limit
elements
Throughout this paragraph, we use t h e notations in Section 8.3. By taking subsets of T,2 , we obtain various kinds of ' q u a n t u m ' decomposition. Here we observe one of the decompositions, which leads us an analysis of anticommutations of semi-circular elements. Let us take a subset £3,7 C ^2 for 0 < 7 < 1, S
V?
:
= iwH
e £ 2 * ' I 1 < * < m a x { l , jN}
<j
or 1 < j < m a x j l , yN} F\ ' denote the subgroup of F2 again obtain a decomposition
generated by Y,\
< i < N}.
. Since (43) holds, we
w
ii = wij + wij + wij-
(46)
According to the decomposition, we define operators
a£ :
(47)
" =-b E ^K)-
where e = ± , o and v :— # S ^ ' ~ 2^(1—f)N2. T h e purpose of this p a r a g r a p h is to establish a limit theorem on t h e operators (47) for a constant 7. General cases are discussed in Hashimoto 9 . It is easy to see t h a t for any g £ F2 , we have 2(7AT - 1)((1 - 7)N
- 1) < #u(N)(g)
< 27(1 -
7 )JV
2
.
(48)
74 However, to determine #w^_ (g) and #Wo (g), we need a delicate argument as follows. Let / := [1, yN] fl N and J := (jN, N] n N . For each n > 0, let us decompose the set V„ of elements g £ F 2 ' with \g\2 = n into 2 2 " disjoint subsets,
V„ := { 5 S F 2 ( ^ | \g\2 = n} =
]J
A ( m , . . ., r,2n)
m.—.»»n€{/,./}
where A ( r 7 i , . . . , »?2n)'s are given by A ( r h , . . . , r ? 2 „ ) : = {°"ii •••o-i 2 „ e V„ | ii e T j i , . . . , i 2 „ e % „ } . W i t h t h e notations above, we see #J^\g)
= 1, for g E A{I,J,m,
#wV V) (fl) = 0, for (1 - l)N 7
5
€ A(I,I,r)3,
N)
- 1 < M (g)
Ar-l<#wi
JV)
• • • ,Vn) U A(J,I,r,3,.. ...,r,n)U
.,%„),
A(J, •/,%,.. . , % „ ) ,
< (1 - 7 ) ^ , for 3 e A ( / , 7}2, . . . . r ^ ) ,
( 5 ) < 7 7 V , f o r g e A(J,Th,...,rjan).
(49)
According to the decomposition of V n , the number vector
Kn)>(JV):=
(s)|0> (^)"5> g€V
\ Jxi I
n
has an orthogonal decomposition into 2 2 n homogeneous vectors
|#(n))W=
|m,...,»»-> (W) ,
£ '71,--,';3ne{/,J}
where | r j ! , . . . ,?7 2 „) (JV) := Z) g € A( m ,...,^ 2 „) ^ ( f l ) ! 0 ) / ^ (
space r ( F 2 ^ ) := ®m,...,mne{i,j}\{vi, (49), we have
• • • ,V2n)
{N)
T h e n we
define a Fock
• It follows from (48) and
a+N(\m, • • • ,V2n)iN)) = \i, J, m, • • •, mn)(N) +1 J, i, m, • • •, mn){N) +vn
aN\I,I,V3,---,V2n){N)
=a-\J,J,r]3,...,Ti2n){N)
=0,
I
l ,- I ,
75
a%\I, / , % , . . . , V2n)(N)
= J2(11
a%\JJ,m,...,r)2n)^
=
J J » J ^ 3 , • • • , mn)(N)
+ Vn (-j=)
,
^l^\IJ,r,3,...,mn)^+vn^-l=y
a^J, J, ,*,,..., %„)<"> = JlEl\I,J:rl3,...,Tl2n)W+vn
(-±=\
. (50)
In view of the relations (50); we prepare a two-mode free Fock space, T 2 := ©~= 0 r 2 (n), where T 2 (n) := C-linear span{|jji,...,Tj2n) | Vi G {I, J}}, equipped with a canonical inner product (m,---,mkWi,---,V2l}
=
5
(m,-,V2k),(v[,v'2l)^
and operators o + , o~ a n d a° specified by 0+
(hl)- •
-JTOH))
= \I,J,Vl:---
J ^ n ) + \J, I, Vl, • • • , »?2n),
a~\I,J,m,---,r)2n)
= a~\J,I,r]3,...,r)2„)
= -\q3, . .. ,T)2n),
a~\I,I,r]3,...,ri2n)
= a~\J,J,ri3,...,r)2n)
= 0,
a°\I, J, %,-••, »?2n) = J oil-
J,7',7'r?3'---'T?2")'
o ° | / , / , r j 3 , . . . ,ry 2 „) = W
J J , J,T?3, . . . ,7?2n),
,
aC|^,-f,»73,---,'?2n) = W - ^
a°\J,J,r]3,...,r]2n)
= J——17,
\I,I,V3,--,mn),
J,rj 3 ,...,fj2n)-
(51)
Summing up the arguments above, we have established a central limit theorem associated with the decomposition (46) as follows. Theorem 30 Let m > 1 and e1,...,em £ {±,o}. Then for any constant 0 < 7 < 1, u G r 2 and TJI, . . . ,r)n £ {I, J}, we have
SS&m\{%)
-($)'•"••• ••*%?,-H*"" '-I- " • > " •
where we use the notation (37). 77ie operators a+, a" and a° are specified by {51). In particular, combinatorial moments with respect to the vacuum state
76 are given by
lim(0|(-L
Y,
- M ) > C < « >
=<0|(a++a-+a°n0)r2.
(52)
Remarks. (1) By a combinatorial argument, we see t h a t the combinatorial moments (52) are given as the number of closed walks on a induced subgraph of a weighted binary tree. (The weights A = l / \ / 2 are given in the figure below.) Indeed rath combinatorial moment Fm is given by the number of m-step walks which leave o and return to o. Let fm be the number of m-step walks which leave z and return to z without arriving at o. By the self-similarity of the graph, we see for m > 2,
Fk
-fc-2, /™ = 5 > * +V24)/' J
Fm — 2_^
k=0
fkFm-k-2
fc=0
where / 0 = FQ = 1. Then the moment generating function F(t) ZmFmtm and f(t) = £ m fmtm satisfy
f{t)-l
= t2(f(t)
+
^-)f(t),
F{t)-l
=
t2F{t)2,
=
hence t2F{t)3 + t2F(t)2 - 2F(t) + 2 = 0. T h e Cauchy transform G(t) of the distribution associated with t h e combinatorial moments (52) is given as a solution of tG(t)3 + G{tf - 2tG(t) + 2 = 0. (2) T h e limit distribution associated with (52) coincides with the one in Examples 1.5 (1.16) and (1.17) of Nica-Speicher 1 8 , u p to t h e variance, where the anti-commutation ab + 6a of semi-circular elements a, b which are free from each other is observed. Indeed we see t h a t
4= y - , e ^
(Ti++ 7r(wt])^((?i
h
--^ )
V
h <*N J
^(l-j)N
77
\^ v/(i- 7 )AT
; v
vw
)'
which is nothing but t h e anti-commutation of semi-circular elements in the limit N —t oo.
5.5
Commutative
association
scheme and its quantum
decomposition
It is quite n a t u r a l to apply our approach of the q u a n t u m decomposition to isotropic random walks on homogeneous graphs. In fact, it will be seen t h a t any adjacency operator of a certain graph is decomposed into a sum of a 'creation', an 'annihilation' and a 'conservation' operators. Such a decomposition is motivated by the s t a n d a r d theory of stochastic evolutions 1 3 . This idea is useful for q u a n t u m limit theorems associated with r a n d o m walks on graphs, particularly, on distance regular graphs. Indeed, Tabei 2 2 and HashimotoO b a t a - T a b e i 1 1 carried out our idea on the Hamming scheme. A q u a n t u m decomposition of adjacency m a t r i x of a H a m m i n g graph is defined with the help of Euler's unicursal theorem, and a q u a n t u m central limit theorem is proved. As a result, we reproduce one of Hora's results 1 2 on t h e asymptotic distribution of eigen values of t h e adjacency matrix associated with a Hamming graph.
References 1. L. Accardi, M. Bozejko, Interacting Fock spaces and Gaussianization of probability measures, Infinite Dimen. Anal. Q u a n t u m P r o b . 1 (1998), 663-670. 2. L. Accardi, Y. Hashimoto and N. O b a t a , Notions of independence related to the free group, Infinite Dimen. Anal. Q u a n t u m P r o b . 1 (1998), 201220. 3. L. Accardi, Y. Hashimoto and N. O b a t a , Singleton independence, Banach Center Publications 4 3 (1998), 9-24. 4. L. Accardi, Y. Hashimoto and N. O b a t a , A role of singletons in quantum central limit theorems, J. Korean M a t h . Soc. 3 5 (1998), 675-690. 5. L. Accardi and N. O b a t a , Introduction to algebraic probability theory, Nagoya Mathematical Lectures 2 (1999). (in Japanese) 6. K. Fichitner, W. Freudenberg and V. Liebscher, Time evolution and invariance of boson systems beam splittings, Infinite Dimen. Anal. Quant u m P r o b . 1 (1998), 511-531.
78 7. Y. Hashimoto, A combinatorial approach to limit distributions of random walks: on discrete groups, preprint, (1996). 8. Y. Hashimoto, Deformations of the semi-circle law derived from random walks on free groups, P r o b . M a t h . Stat. 18 (1998), 399-410. 9. Y. Hashimoto, Samples of algebraic central limit theorems based on Z / 2 Z , In Infinite dimensional harmonic analysis, Transaction of a JapaneseGerman Symposium, Kyoto,1999, 115-126. 10. Y. Hashimoto, Quantum decomposition in discrete groups and interacting Fock spaces, Infinite Dimen. Anal. Q u a n t u m P r o b . (2001) (to appear). 11. Y. Hashimoto, N. O b a t a and N. Tabei, A quantum aspect of asymptotic spectral analysis of large Hamming graphs, in " Q u a n t u m information IV (T. Hida and K. Saito Eds.)," (2001). 12. A. Hora, Central limit theorems and asymptotic spectral analysis on large graphs, Infinite Dimen. Anal. Q u a n t u m P r o b . 1 (1998), 221-246. 13. R. Hudson a n d K. P a r t h a s a r a t h y , Quantum Ito's formula and stochastic evolutions, Commun. M a t h . Phys. 9 3 (1984),301-323. 14. P. Hilton and J. Pederson, Catalan Numbers, Their Generalization and Their Uses, M a t h . Intelligencer 1 3 (1991), 64-75. 15. Y. Lu: On the interacting free Fock space and the deformed Wigner law, Nagoya M a t h . J. 1 4 5 (1997), 1-28. 16. Y. Lu: Interacting Fock spaces related to the Anderson model, Infinite Dimensional Analysis and Q u a n t u m Probability 1 No.2 (1998), 247-283. 17. N. Muraki, A new example of noncommutative "de Moivre-Laplace theorem", in "Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics: Proceedings of the Seventh Japan-Russia Symposium (S. W a t a n a b e , Ed.)," Tokyo, 1995, 353-362, World Scientific (1996). 18. A. Nica and R. Speicher, Commutators of free random variables, Duke M a t h . J. 92 No.3 (1998), 553-592. 19. F . Oravecz, Deformed Poisson-laws as certain transform of deformed Gaussian-laws, preprint (2000). 20. N. Saitoh and H. Yoshida, Graphical representations of the q-creation and the q-annihilation operators and set partition statistics, preprint (2000). 21. R. Speicher, A new example of 'Independence' and 'White Noise', P r o b . Th. Relat. Fields 8 4 (1990), 141-159. 22. N. Tabei, Quantum decomposition on Hamming graphs and central limit theorem, Master Thesis, Nagoya University (2001). (in Japanese) 23. D. Voiculescu, K. Dykema and A. Nica, Free Random Variables, C R M Monograph Ser. Amer. M a t h . Soc. (1992),
Quantum Information IV (pp. 79-86) Eds. T. Hida and K. Saito © 2002 World Scientific Publishing Co.
SOME T H O U G H T S ON T H E INFINITE D I M E N S I O N A L H A R M O N I C ANALYSIS T A K E Y U K I HIDA Faculty
of Science and Technology, Meijo Nagoya 468-8502, Japan
University
YUKO HARA-MIMACHI Department
of Information Sciences, Meijo Nagoya 468-8502, Japan
University
White noise analysis has extensively developed during the past quarter century, and it is now able to think of the significant characteristics of the theory. Among others we should like to emphasize that the white noise analysis enjoys an aspect of an infinite dimensional harmonic analysis. In this article we shall discuss the role of the infinite dimensional rotation group in the study of white noise theory and propose some of future directions as well as its frontiers that shall be discussed in this line.
It is important for him who wants to discover not to confine himself to one chapter of science, but to keep in touch with others. - J. Hadamard Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 60H40
1 1.1
Background Rotation group
Let E cL2(Rd)
C E*
be a Gel'fand triple. The white noise measure /i is introduced on E*. Let O(E) be the group of linear isomorphisms g which are orthogonal. It is called the infinite dimensional rotation group. Let 0*(E*) be the collection of the adjoints g* with g £ O(E). The set 0*(E*) also forms a group which is isomorphic to 0(E) under the correspondence There is an important property stated by the following Proposition 1. The white noise measure fi is 0*(.E*)-invariant.
80 This assertion can b e proved by the invariance of the characteristic functional of (i under the action of g, and the functional provides a link between the infinite dimensional rotation group and white noise analysis; indeed we can carry on the harmonic analysis arising from the group O(E). 1.2
Fock space
We form a complex Hilbert space (L 2 ) = L2(E*,fj,). A member of (L 2 ) is a white noise functional. T h e following assertion is known. P r o p o s i t i o n 2. T h e space (L2) admits a direct sum decomposition: oo
71 = 0
This is called the Fock space. A member of Hn is a homogeneous chaos of degree n. 1.3
Subgroups of
O(E)
T h e group 0(E) is topologized by the compact-open topology. It is neither compact nor locally compact. In addition, as we shall see below, there are various subgroups of 0(E), each of which enjoys its own interesting property from the viewpoint of probability theory a n d / o r analysis. I. Finite dimensional subgroups of rotations. Fix a complete orthonormal system {£ n } of L2(Rd). Then, one can easily find a subgroup Gn of O(E) such t h a t Gn is isomorphic to SO(n). Let G^ be t h e inductive limit of the Gn. Associated with a member g of 0(E) is a unitary operator Ug acting on (L 2 ) which is defined by (Ug
It is known t h a t
P r o p o s i t i o n 3. 1) T h e unitary representation {Ug, Hn} is irreducible. 2) T h e subgroup G^ characterizes t h e infinite dimensional Laplace-Beltrami operator Aoo which is given by
A
d2
d
- = S^-(*,f»>^}-
81 As a consequence t h e subspace Hn is t h e eigenspace of the infinite dimensional Laplace-Beltrami operator Aoo. In fact, t h e eigenvalue is — n. II. T h e Levy group Q. Still a complete orthonormal system {£„} is fixed. Let 7r b e a p e r m u t a t i o n of the natural numbers. Then, a change of the coordinate vectors is defined: 9n '•
?n
^ S7r(n)-
Then, gn extends to a linear transformation on E. Now assume t h a t the density d(7r) of n is zero:
d(7r) = lim sup — # { n < N; n(n) > N} = 0. T h e collection G = {gieGO(E);d{1r) forms a group which is called the Levy T h e Levy Laplacian defined by
= 0}
group.
has a close connection with the Levy group. It is noted the following assertion. T r i v i a l i t y T h e Levy group has a continuous representation on the space of generalized white noise functionals. III. Whiskers. A whisker we mean t h a t a one-parameter subgroup {gt} of O(E) t h a t comes from a one-parameter family of diffeomorphisms of the parameter space Rd. It is expressed in the form
gt •• &*)-^
t(Mu)W\AM«))\,
where J means t h e Jacobian. There is assumed t h a t ipf^>
— 4>t+s-
Example. T h e shift -{St}- It is defined by
Stt(u) = f(« - *)•
82 Let Tt be t h e adjoint of St. Then {Tt,t £ R} is t h e flow of Brownian motion after S. Kakutani [4]. His pioneering work has stimulated our study. Note t h a t t h e shift describes t h e propagation of chaos as time t goes by. T h e subgroups in II and III are, as it were, essentially infinite dimensional, although they have different flavour from each other. As for t h e subgroup III, we can see this property through t h e their spectrum; in general, they have count ably Lebesgue spectrum.
2
Roles of whiskers
T h e plan of this report is to emphasize the important roles of whiskers, in particular conformal group, in the study of white noise analysis. In particular, special roles can b e seen in t h e study of r a n d o m fields which are indexed by a manifold and are formed by a white noise functional. Let {gt} be a whisker as is given in the last section. Then, as is known, it is conjugate to the shift. More exactly, the function ipt{u) defining the gt can b e expressed in the form
iM«) = / [ / - 1 («) + *]. where / is a strictly monotone, continuous function on R. For important examples of a whisker with which we shall be concerned, t h e function / can be a function t h a t is smooth enough. (See, e.g. [2, C h a p t 5].) We now give an interpretation why a whisker is essentially infinite dimensional. Remind a notion of t h e average power r(x,g) of a rotation g. T h e definition is (see [1])
r(x,g)
1 " =limsup-y](a:,£fc fc=i
g£k)2.
Note t h a t this definition depends on the choice of a complete orthonormal system. If the average power is positive, then g is considered to be infinite dimensional. P r o p o s i t i o n 4. For the shift {St}, dimensional.
essentially
any St, with t ^ 0 is essentially infinite
83 Proof. Take a n St. Choose a complete orthonormal system {£*,}. We have a n equality (x,St£)
=
(x,exp[i\t]i),
from which we can easily prove t h e assertion. T h e o r e m 1. All t h e nontrivial whiskers are essentially infinite dimensional. Proof. From Proposition 4 and t h e fact t h a t any whisker is conjugate to t h e shift except trivial cases, we can prove t h e theorem. Remark. There are also many other members in t h e Levy group which are essentially infinite dimensional. Coming back to whisker, it is convenient to have its infinitesimal generator a, which can b e expressed in t h e form i \ d + -a 1 //(u), \ a = a[u)— du
I
with a suitable function a{u). W i t h t h e help of t h e generators we can discover complex relationship between whiskers, and even think of their roles in white noise analysis. 3
Conformal group
Starting from t h e shift, which describes t h e flow of Brownian motion (and hence t h e most i m p o r t a n t whisker), we can find some other whiskers which have good commutation relations and have significant probabilistic meaning. Actually, we are given several interesting whiskers and p u t t i n g t h e m together it is proved t h a t they form a conformal group, denoted by C(d). T h e parameter space of white noise is now taken to be R . W i t h some generalization of what has been discussed in [2], we claim t h a t those whiskers in question can be listed as follows: 1) Shift, 2) isotropic dilations, 3) subgroup isomorphic to
SO(d),
84
4) special conformal transformations. It is known that the subgroup C(d) of 0(E) is isomorphic to the classical group SO(d + 1 , 1 ) . Its Lee group structure help our study of white noise. One of the interesting and in fact significant applications is that a unitary representation of the group C(d) contributes to the innovation theory of a random field. Let X(C) be a random field parameterized by a closed convex manifold C. Assume, in particular, that the parameter C runs through a class C of ovaloids in Rd. We are interested in the case where X(C) is expressed as a causal (generalized) functional of white noise x(u),u G (C), where (C) denites a domain enclosed by C. Generally speaking, geometric structure of the manifold C can describe the information theoretical behavior of the random field X(C). The C, unlike the time parameter t, enjoys complex structure, so that when C deforms X(C) carries more information than X(t). In particular, the variation SX(C) by using conformal transformations is useful for our study. The basic idea is illustrated below. The infinitesimal deformation of C is represented by a family of functions {5(s),s G C}. We apply the conformal transformations that leave the C invariant. Then, we are given various family of functions 6(s) which is dense in the L2-class of functions over C. This comes from the irreducible unitary reprersentation theory of the conformal group. This claims that the {x(s), s G C} can be obtained if X(C) is Gaussian. The system is the innovation for X(C). We assume that C is taken as before and and the representation of X[C) is causal in x(u). Then, we can prove Theorem 2. For a Gaussian random fields X(C), the innovation is obtained by the conformal transformations acting on the basic parameter space Rd. Further we can introduce the so-called stochastic variational equation which determines a random field. See [8].
4
Concluding remarks
There are three remarks.
85 I. Reversibility. As soon as we come to t h e study of a r a n d o m field X(C), we have t o worry about how to define t h e reversibility of t h e random phenomena. For X(t) only one direction and reverse can b e considered when we think of propagation of the r a n d o m phenomena. As for the X(C) the direction of propagation is not unique, but should not vaguely defined. Deformations of the parameter C are recommended to be taken within the conformal group. Here is a useful information. In the two dimensional parameter case, we prefer to use notations in the complex plane. A conformal mapping from unit circle onto itself is written as z —a w - 1T, az — 1 where j —y | = 1. II. Applications to physics. Stochastic variational equation determines a Euclidean field. We hope this can be extended to relativistic q u a n t u m fields. We have hope to establish a p a t h integral for a r a n d o m field indexed by C. This would be a good approach to quantization of a q u a n t u m field. III. T h e white noise theory has so far much related (not based on) to t h e socalled L 2 -nonlinearity. It should be refeminded t h a t t h e original idea of the white noise theory came from, as it were, the reductionism; nemely, we start with a system of basic and atomic random variables, like white noise, and analyse the functionals of those variable in the system. T h e assumption to restrict functionals in L2 -class is somewhat too restrictive. There are many other interesting classes of r a n d o m functions which have not variances, so t h a t the analysis requires suitable topology which is not the mean square, and hence it needs new tools from analysis, like entropy. Anyhow, we should now think of some new frontier of white noise analysis. T h e authors have already started a study in this direction and given lectures at the present Academic Frontier Project Seminar. Some part of our study will also be printed as t h e literature [3]. Further development will b e reported in the Q u a n t u m Information Series.
86 References [1] L. Accardi et al ed. Selected papers of Takeyuki Hida. World Scientific P u b . Co. 2001. [2] T. Hida, Brownian motion. 1975 (in Japanese); English Translation 1980 Springer-Verlag. [3] T. Hida, W h i t e noise analysis: A new frontier, Univ. Center P u b . N. 499, 2002.
Roma, Volterra
[4] S. Kakutani, Determination of the spectrum of the flow of Brownian motion. Proc. National Acad. Sci., 36 (1950), 319-323. [5] H.-H. Kuo, W h i t e noise distribution theory, 1996, CRC Press. [6] P. Levy, Problemes concrets d'analyse fonctionnelle. 1951 Gauthier-Villars. [7] P. Levy, Processus stochastiques et mouvement brownien. 1948: 2eme ed. 1965, Gauthier-Villars. [8] Si Si, Innovation for some r a n d o m fields. J. Korean Math. Soc. 35, no.3, 1998, 793-802. [9] Si Si, Gaussian processes and Gaussian random fields. Q u a n t u m Information II2000, World Scientific P u b . Co., p p 195-204. [10] Si Si and Win W i n Htay, Topics on Complex Gaussian r a n d o m fields, 2001. Q u a n t u m Information IV, World Scientific P u b . Co., (in this volume).
Quantum Information IV (pp. 87-102) Eds. T. Hida and K. Saito © 2002 World Scientific Publishing Co. A T R E A T M E N T OF Q U A N T U M BAKER'S M A P B Y CHAOS DEGREE
KEIINOUE, MASANORI OHYA Department of Information Sciences Science University of Tokyo Noda City, Chiba 278-8510 Japan IGOR V. VOLOVICH Steklov Mathematical Institute, Russian Academy of Science Gubkin St. 42, Moscow, GSP1, 117966, Russia We study the chaotic behaviour and the quantum-classical correspondence for the baker's map. Correspondence between quantum and classical expectation values is investigated and it is shown that it is lost at the logarithmic timescale. The quantum chaos degree is computed and it is demonstrated that it describes the chaotic features of the model. The correspondence between classical and quantum chaos degrees is considered.
1
Introduction
T h e study of chaotic behaviour in classical dynamical systems is dating back to Lobachevsky and H a d a m a r d who have been studied t h e exponential instability property of geodesies on manifolds of negative curvature and to Poincare, who initiated the inquiry into the stability of t h e solar system. One believes now t h a t the main features of chaotic behaviour in the classical dynamical systems are rather well understood, see for example [1, 27]. However t h e status of " q u a n t u m chaos" is much less clear although the significant progress has been made on this front. Sometimes one says t h a t an approach to q u a n t u m chaos, which a t t e m p t s to generalize the classical notion of sensitivity to initial conditions, fails for two reasons: first there is no q u a n t u m analogue of the classical phase space trajectories and, second, the unitarity of linear Schrodinger equation precludes sensitivity to initial conditions in the q u a n t u m dynamics of s t a t e vector. Let us remind, however, t h a t in fact there exists a q u a n t u m analogue of the classical phase space trajectories. It is q u a n t u m evolution of expectation values of appropriate observables in suitable states. Also let us remind t h a t the dynamics of a classical system can be described either by t h e Hamilton equations or by the liner Liouville equations. In q u a n t u m theory the linear
88 Schrodinger equation is the counterpart of the Liouville equation while the q u a n t u m counterpart of the classical Hamilton's equation is the Heisenberg equation. Therefore t h e study of q u a n t u m expectation values should reveal the chaotic behaviour of q u a n t u m systems. In this paper we demonstrate this fact for the q u a n t u m baker's m a p . If one has the classical Hamilton's equations dq/dt = p,
dp/dt = -V
(q),
then the corresponding q u a n t u m Heisenberg equations have the same form dqh/dt-ph,
dph/dt
= -V'
(qh),
where qh and ph are q u a n t u m canonical operators of position and m o m e n t u m . For the expectation values one gets t h e Ehrenfest equations d
/dt =< ph>,
d
/dt = - < V (qh) >
Note t h a t t h e Ehrenfest equations are classical equations b u t for non nonlinear V (qh) they are neither Hamiltonian's equations nor even differential equations because one can not write < V' (qh) > as a function of < qh > and < Ph > • However these equations are very convenient for t h e consideration of the semiclassical properties of q u a n t u m system. T h e expectation values < qh > and < ph > are functions of time and initial data. They also depend on the q u a n t u m states. One of important problems is to study the dependence of expectation values from t h e initial data. In this paper we will study this problem for the q u a n t u m baker's m a p . T h e m a i n objective of " q u a n t u m chaos" is to study t h e correspondence between classical chaotic systems and their q u a n t u m counterparts in t h e semiclassical limit [8,7]. The quantum-classical correspondence for dynamical systems has been studied for many years, see for example [3,10,30] and reference therein. A significant progress in understanding of this correspondence has been achieved in the W K B approach when one considers the Planck constant h as a small variable parameter. T h e n it is well known t h a t in the limit h —> 0 q u a n t u m theory is reduced to the classical one. However in physics the Planck constant is a fixed constant although it is very small. Therefore it is import a n t to study the relation between classical and q u a n t u m evolutions when the Planck constant is fixed. There is a conjecture [29,5] t h a t a characteristic timescale r appears in t h e quantal evolution of chaotic dynamical systems. For time less then r there is a correspondence between q u a n t u m and classical expectation values, while for times greater t h a t T the predictions of the classical and q u a n t u m dynamics no longer coincide. T h e important problem is
89 t o estimate t h e dependence r on the Planck constant h. Probably a universal formula expressing r in terms of h does not exist and every model should b e studied case by case. It is expected t h a t certain q u a n t u m and classical expectation values diverge on a timescale inversely proportional to some power of h [4]. Other authors suggest t h a t a breakdown may b e anticipated on a much smaller logarithmic timescale [20,9,22,14,17,24,25,18]. T h e characteristic time T associated with the hyperbolic fixed points of the classical motion is expected to be of the logarithmic form r — j In ^ where A is the Lyapunov exponent and C is a constant which can be taken to be the classical action. Such the logarithmic timescale has been found in the numerical simulations of some dynamical models [30]. It was shown also t h a t t h e discrepancy between q u a n t u m and classical evolutions is decreased by even a small coupling with the environment, which in t h e q u a n t u m case leads to decoherence [30]. T h e chaotic behaviour of the classical dynamical systems is often investigated by computing the Lyapunov exponents. An alternative quantity measuring chaos in dynamical systems which is called the chaos degree has been suggested in [19] in the general framework of information dynamics [12]. T h e chaos degree was applied to various models in [13]. An advantage of the chaos degree is t h a t it can be applied not only to classical systems but also to q u a n t u m systems as well. In this work we study the chaotic behaviour and the quantum-classical correspondence for the baker's m a p [4,21]. T h e q u a n t u m baker's m a p is a simple model invented for t h e theoretical study of q u a n t u m chaos. Its m a t h ematical properties have been studied in numerical works. In particular its semiclassical properties have been considered [20,9,22,14,17,24,25,18], quant u m computing and optical realizations have been proposed [11,23,6], various quantization procedures have been discussed [16,15,22,26], a symbolic dynamics representation has been given [26]. It is well known t h a t for the consideration of the semiclassical limit in q u a n t u m mechanics it is very useful to use coherent states. We define an analogue of t h e coherent states for t h e q u a n t u m baker's m a p . We study the q u a n t u m baker's m a p by using the correlation functions of the special form which corresponds to the expectation values of Weyl operators, translated in time by the unitary evolution operator and taken in the coherent states. To explain our formalism we first discuss the classical limit for correlation functions in ordinary q u a n t u m mechanics. Correspondence between q u a n t u m and classical expectation values for the baker's m a p is investigated and it is shown t h a t it is lost at the logarithmic timescale. T h e chaos degree for the q u a n t u m baker's m a p is computed and it is demonstrated t h a t it describes the chaotic features of the model. T h e dependence of t h e chaos degree on
90 the Planck constant is studied and t h e correspondence between classical and q u a n t u m chaos degrees is established.. 2
Q u a n t u m vs. Classical D y n a m i c s
In this section we discuss an approach to the semiclassical limit in q u a n t u m mechanics by using the coherent states, see [10]. Then in the next section an extension of this approach to the q u a n t u m baker's m a p will be given. Consider the canonical system with the Hamiltonian function
H=£
+ V(x)
(1)
in the plane (p, x) G R 2 . We assume t h a t the canonical equations
x(t)=p(t),
p(t) = -V'(x{t))
(2)
have a unique solution (x (i) ,p (t)) for times \t\ < T with the initial d a t a
p ( 0 ) = «o
SB(0) = ;CO,
(3)
This is equivalent to the solution of the Newton equation x(t)
= -V'(x(t))
(4)
with the initial d a t a
x(0) = x0,
x(0)=v0
(5)
We denote
a = —=. (x0 + iv0) T h e q u a n t u m Hamiltonian operator has the form Hh = ^
+
V(qh)
where p/, and qh satisfy the commutation relations [Ph,qh] =
-ih
(6)
91 T h e Heisenberg evolution of the canonical variables is defined as ph (t) = U {t)phU
(i)* ,
Qh (t) = U (t) qhU ( 0 *
where U (t) = exp
(-itHh/h)
For the consideration of the classical limit we take the following representation ph = -ih1/2d/dx,
qh =
h1/2x
acting t o functions of t h e variable x £ R . We also set
a=
^&{qh
+ iPh) =
a =
-k{X + £)'
^{qh-iph)=T2(:x-i)'
*
then \a,a*} = 1. T h e coherent state \a) is denned as \a) = W(a)\0)
(7)
where a is a complex number, W (a) — exp (aa* — act*) and |0) is t h e vacuum vector, a |0) = 0. T h e vacuum vector is the solution of the equation
{qh + iph) |0> = 0
(8)
In the x - representation one has |0) =exp(-x2/2)
/V2^.
(9)
T h e operator W (a) one can write also in t h e form W (a) = CeiqhVa/hl'2e-lphXa'h}12
(10)
where C — exp (—vQxQ/2h). T h e mean value of t h e position operator with respect to the coherent vectors is the real valued function
92
q (t, a, h) = (h-l/2a\
qh {t) | f c ~ 1 / 2 a )
(11)
Now one can present the following basic formula describing t h e semiclassical limit \hnq(t,a,h)
= x{t,a)
(12)
h-yO
Here x (t, a ) is the solution of (4) with the initial d a t a (5) and a is given by (6). Let us notice t h a t for time t = 0 the q u a n t u m expectation value q (t, a, h) is equal t o the classical one: q(0,a,h)
= x{0,a)
= x0
(13)
for any h. We are going t o compare the time dependence of two real functions q(t,a,h) and x(t,a). For small t these functions are approximately equal. T h e i m p o r t a n t problem is t o estimate for which t the large difference between t h e m will appear. It is expected t h a t certain q u a n t u m and classical expectation values diverge on a timescale inversely proportional to some power of h [10]. Other authors suggest t h a t a breakdown may b e anticipated on a much smaller logarithmic timescale [20,9,22,14,17,24,25,18]. One of very interesting examples of classical systems with chaotic behaviour is described by t h e hamiltonian function
H = £ + £ + \x\x22
l 2 2 2 T h e consideration of this classical and q u a n t u m model within t h e described framework will be presented in another publication.
3
C o h e r e n t S t a t e s for t h e Q u a n t u m B a k e r ' s M a p
T h e classical baker's transformation maps the unit square 0 < q,p < 1 onto itself according t o
r„^_J( 2 9'P/ 2 )' l 9
'
P
if
^ \ ( 2 g - l ) ( p + l)/2),if
°<9
9
<1
This corresponds t o compressing the unit square in the p direction and stretching it in t h e q direction, while preserving t h e area, t h e n cutting it vertically and stacking the right part on top of t h e left part.
93 To quantize t h e unite square one defines the unitary displacement operators U and V in D - dimensional Hilbert space, which produce displacements in the m o m e n t u m and position directions, respectively, and which obey the commutation relation UV =
eVU,
where e = e x p ( 2 7 r i / D ) . We choose D = 2N. T h e "Planck constant" h = 1/D = 2~N. T h e operators U and V can be written as U = e2"4,
V = e2™?
T h e position and m o m e n t u m operators q and p b o t h have eigenvalues j/D, j = 0,..., D — 1. If {|<7j)} are the eigenvectors of the position operator q then t h e eigenvectors of t h e m o m e n t u m operator {|pj)} are obtained by using the discrete Fourier transform i*V :
\Pi) = FN\*i) =
-J5iie2*ikilD\
T h e q u a n t u m baker's m a p is written as the following matrix
We define the coherent states by
\a) = Ce2^ve-2KiPx
|i/>0)
(15)
Here a = x + iv, x and v are integers, C is t h e normalization constant and \tp0) is the vacuum vector. This definition should be compared with 10. T h e vacuum vector can be defined as the solution of the equation {qh + iph) \i>o) = 0 (compare with 8). We will use the simpler definition which in the position representation is (< 7i |Vo) = C e x p ( - 9 2 / 2 ) (compare with 9). Here C is a normalization constant.
94 4
Chaos Degree
Let us review the entropic chaos degree defined in [19]. This entropic chaos degree is given by the probability distribution ip of a orbit generated by a dynamics (channel) A* sending a s t a t e to a state; tp = ^iPfc^fc, where 5k 1 (k = j) - ,, . .{ . Then the entropic chaos
{
degree is defined as D(^A*)
= YtPkS(A*Sk)
(16)
k
with the von N e u m a n n entropy S, equivalently to t h e Shannon entropy because the probability distribution ip is a classical object. T h e above channel A* produces a dynamics F of t h e orbit, so t h a t let xn be the orbit or a certain function of the orbit at time n and F be a m a p from xn to xn+i, For a m a p F on / = [a,6] c R N with xn+± — F (xn) (a difference equation), let / = \Jk Bk be a finite partition with Bi n B}: = 0 (i ^ j). T h e state tpW of the orbit determined by the difference equation is defined by the probability distribution (p\ J , t h a t is, ipW = p ' " ' = J2iPi "i> w n e r e for an initial value x £ / and the characteristic function 1 A m+n m+n
1
-ri £ i* (rk*) •
Pi
m+ _
W h e n the initial value x is distributed K due to a measure v on / , t h e above (n) .
p\
.
is given as -.
« m+n fc=n
T h e joint distribution ( p | " , n
) between the time n and n + 1 is defined by
or
^n'"+1) = ~ r / £ ^ (Ffc») in, (rfc+1*) */. Then the channel Aj^ at n is determined by
95
and the chaos degree is given by
This classical chaos degree was applied t o several dynamical maps such logistic map, Baker's transformation and Tinkerbel m a p , and it could explain their chaotic characters [19,13]. Our chaos degree has several merits compared with usual measures such as Lyapunov exponent. We can judge whether t h e dynamics causes a chaos or not by t h e value of D as D > 0 <=> chaotic, D = 0 «=> stable. 5
C h a o s D e g r e e for t h e Q u a n t u m B a k e r ' s m a p
In this section, we show a general representation of the mean value of the position operator q for the time evolution, which is constructed by the q u a n t u m baker's map. T h e n we give t h e algorithm to compute the chaos degree for the q u a n t u m baker's m a p . Recently a whole class of q u a n t u m baker's maps has been defined in [26]. It is a q u a n t u m analogy of t h e symbolic dynamics [2] for the classical baker's map. For any n, 1
Tn | 6 6 • • • £ n « £ n + l £ n + 2
-
" - 6v) = | 6 6 ' ' • £n+l«£n+26> + 3 ' ' ' 6v) ,
where the vector | ^ £ 2 • • • 61.61+161+2 • • • 6 v ) 1 6 6 • • • U.U+ltn+2
is
g
iven
(18)
W
• • • 6 v ) = |£»+1> ® ' ' • ® I6v> J*0*""*1)
®
v/I72 {|0) + exp [2ixi (0.& 1)] | 1 » ® y/l/2{\0)
+ exp [2ni ( 0 - 6 6 1 ) ] |1>} ® • • • ®
\ / l 7 2 { | 0 ) + e x p [2iri (0.&, • • • Cil)] | 1 »
96 for n, 1
TN-I 166 • • -6v-i-6v) = | 6 6 • • -6v) •
(19)
For n = 0, the m a p is (20)
To 1-66 •••£*> = 1 6 - 6 6 • • • £ * ) .
To study the time evolution and the classical limit ft. —> 0 which corresponds to N —t oo of the q u a n t u m baker's m a p To, we introduce the following the mean value of the position operator q for time n £ N with respect to a single basis |£):
r»£ ' = <£|r o »gT 0 -»|0.
(21)
2 — 1
where |f) = | 6 6 " - 6 v ) and g = S J = 0 9; |j) ( j | with eigen values qj = * ± J £ , j = 0 , 1 , . . . , 2N - 1, j = E f = 1 jk2N-k and j k = 0 , 1 . T h e simple formula of the matrix elements of To with respect to two different bases is given by
<e°| To IO = V I I
5
(^ -ri-i)«p ( ^ Itf - &
(22)
*i=2
where|£°) = | t f # - - - & ) and | ^ ) = ! # £ • • • & ) [28]. From (22), the following formula of t h e matrix elements of T£ for any n G N is easily obtained.
'mn(uL7HC+k-ek)) = <
(nr=i^?ci,_.+1) I] {Am)e
e
*n
^=1
B
AT
(¥) fc=inu B w
if n = miV,
where|£°) = | t f $ • • • ?N) , If 1 ) = ^ ' ' " & > . ^ is t h e 2 X 2 matrix with the element ^4i l X 2 = exp (-|i |«i — x2\) for x\,xz = 0 , 1 , p = 1, • • •, iV — 1 and m e N.
97 Using these formula, t h e following theorem are proved. T H E O R E M 5.1 r £ } = ( S~^N~n
2_/fc=l
t
9 -fc _|_ 2 " 2»+l
ifn
Sra+fcZ
2
1
V
2
W
- 1 j + 1/2
/r
n (^r 't +i
2 N-p
/,m+l\ N-p+k
r
0l
if n = mN,
^ k 3k
fc=l
if n = mAf + p
(24) w/iere | f ° ) = |£°£° • • • & ) , | £ : ) = \£l£ • • • £}N) , A is the 2 x 2 matrix with the element AXlX2 — exp (ji \x^ — x2\) for xi,x2 = 0 , 1 , p = 1, • • •, N — 1 and m £ N. By diagonalizing the matrix A, we obtain t h e following formula of the absolute square of the matrix elements of An for any n £ N . L E M M A 5.2 For- any n £ N , we have l A >*i
-|
2
"sin
2
= J ( ^ ) t/fe
Combining t h e above theorem a n d lemma, we obtain t h e following two theorems with respect to t h e mean value rN of t h e position operator. T H E O R E M 5.3 For the case n = mN +p, p = 1, 2 , . . . AT - 1 and m £ N , we have
»
Yjk=i ?p+k 2 + 2i7+T ,JV Efc=iv^p+i Vk-(N-P)2'k + 2 27f+Pi+1 = < 1 ^ 2^fc=i Vp+k* -*-+- -JFHT: -2" + l . Z fc=AT-p+l ?*:-( AT-p)' - f c + 2£ N l J
-p+1 s « - ( J V - p j "
i
2 +
if m = 0 [mod 4) ifm = l (mod 4) ifm = 2 (mod 4)
(25)
if m = 3 (mod 4 ) .
where r\\. = £*. + 1 (mod 2 ) , A; = 1, • • •, N. T H E O R E M 5.4 For the case N - mN,m £ N , we have (n)
E £ = i 6 2 - f c + ^ r i / m = 0 (mod ^) i if m = 1 , 3 (raoii ^) r
2
!
i m
Efc=i ?fc ~* + 2 ^ f
= 2
(
mod
(26)
4) •
Using these formulas (24), (25) a n d (26) , t h e probability distribution [Pi
) °f t n e orbit of mean value r£
of the position operator q for t h e time
evolution, which is constructed by t h e q u a n t u m baker's m a p , is given by
98 m+n
(n) —
for an initial value rN distribution ( p | ?
,n
!
V^ 1
(
W\
€ [0,1] and the characteristic function 1 ^ . T h e joint ) between the time n and n + 1 is given by m+n
i-ir'^sTix:'-.^") 1 *^")Thus the chaos degree for the q u a n t u m baker's m a p is calculated by
(n)
(
,
^(P - ;A;)=E*"
+1)
f I). ^I^
( 27 )
whose numerical value is shown in the next section.
6
N u m e r i c a l S i m u l a t i o n of t h e C h a o s D e g r e e a n d Classical-Quantum Correspondence
We compare the dynamics of the mean value rN of position operator q with t h a t of the classical value g*™' in the g direction. We take an initial value of the mean value as
where & is a pseudo-random number valued with 0 or 1. At t h e time zero we assume t h a t t h e classical value g' 0 ' in the g direction takes the same value as the mean value rjy of position operator g. T h e distribution of r^ for the case N = 500 is shown in Fig.l u p to t h e time n = 1000. T h e distribution of the classical value q^ for the case N = 500 in the q direction is shown in Fig. 2 up to t h e time n = 1000.
99
» ' N
• *
•
•
* • • * ; • • •
.8
* w v%" * V: *
.6
v?-V\-; "•*•**»/• " • ' • * •
*
•
• • • • . .
';•
;
•••'
.4 1 .2 • •
I
•
. . « • • • •
i T i l '
J * |
v
• • « . *
* *
t
» »•
»
n
0
200
400
600
1000
800
Fig.l. The distribution of ^ for the case Af=500 .(»)
XT W^
-TV
0.7 ••••*•>
•.••
•••
* n / \ ; «
0.5
-.
0.2
-*-*?
».*
1
._•» . - ^
-+-*
«.*•:••• *
0.1 0
200
V*.
»-«—V^
• »•
400
•
600
1000
800
n
)
Fig.2. The distribution of the classical value q"' for the case N=5Q0
Fig.3 presents the change of the chaos degree for the case AT = 500 u p to the time n = 1000.
100
D 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
-0.1
Fig.3. The change of the chaos degree for the case N=500 up to time n=1000
T h e correspondence between the chaos degree Dq for the q u a n t u m baker's m a p and t h e chaos degree Dc for the classical baker's m a p for a fixed N (500, here) is shown for t h e time less t h a n T = log 2 \ — log 2 2N = N, and it is lost at the logarithtic time scale T. T h e difference of the chaos degrees between the chaos degree Dq for the q u a n t u m baker's m a p and the chaos degree Dc for the classical baker's m a p for a fixed time n (1000, here) is displayed w.r.t. N in Fig.4.
101
N 700
900
1000
Fig.4. The difference of the chaos degree between quantum and classical for the case n=1000 T h u s we conclude t h a t t h e dynamics of the mean value r^ reduces the classical dynamics q(n) in t h e q direction in the classical limit N —> oo (h —t 0). References 1. D.V.Anosov and V.I.Arnold (eds.), Dynamical Systems, VINITI, Moscow, 1996. 2. V.M. Alekseev and M.N.Yakobson, Symbolic dynamics and hyperbolic dynamic systems, P h y s . Reports, 7 5 , 287-325, 1981. 3. I.Y. Arefeva, P.B. Medvedev, O.A. Rytchkov a n d I.V. Volovich, Chaos in m(atrix) theory, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 1 0 , No.2-3, 213-223, 1999. 4. N.L.Balazs and A.Voros, T h e quantized baker's transformation, Ann. Phys., 190, 1-31, 1989. 5. M.V.Berry, Some quantum-to classical asymptotics, Les Houches Summer School "chaos and q u a n t u m physics", Edits. Giannoni, M.J. Voros, A. and Justi, Zinn, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991. 6. T . B r u n a n d R.Schack, Realizing t h e q u a n t u m baker's m a p on an N M R q u a n t u m computer, Phys. Rev. A, 5 9 , 2649-2658 , 1999. 7. G.Casati and B.V.Chirikov (eds.), Quantum Chaos: between Order and Disorder, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995. 8. M.C.Gutzwiller, Chaos in classical and Quantum Mechanics, Springer, Berlin, 1990. 9. F.M.Dittes, E.Doron and U.Smilansky, Long-time behavior of the semi-
102
10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26.
27. 28. 29. 30.
classical baker's m a p , P h y s . Rev. E, 4 9 , R963- R966,1994. K.Hepp, T h e classical limit for q u a n t u m mechanical correlation functions, C o m m u n . M a t h . P h y s . , 3 5 , 265-277, 1974. J.H.Hannay, J.P.Keating and A.M.Ozorio de Almeida, Optical realization of t h e baker's transformation, Nonlinearity, 7, 1327-1342, 1994. R.S.Ingarden, A.Kossakowski and M.Ohya, Information Dynamics and Open Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997. K.Inoue, M.Ohya and K.Sato, Application of chaos degree to some dynamical systems, Chaos, Soliton and Fractals, 1 1 , 1377-1385, 2000. L.Kaplan and E.J.Heller, Overcoming the wall in the semiclassical baker's m a p , Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 1453-1456, 1996. A.Lakshminarayan, On the q u a n t u m baker's m a p and its unusual traces, Ann. Phys., 2 3 9 , 272-295,1995. A.Lakshminarayan and N.L.Balazs, T h e classical and q u a n t u m mechanics of Lazy baker maps, Ann. Phys., 2 2 6 , 350-373, 1993. M.G.E. da Luz and A.M.Ozorio de Almeida, P a t h integral for the quant u m baker's m a p , Nonlinearity, 8, 43-64, 1995. P.W.O'Connor and S.Tomsovic, T h e unusual n a t u r e of the q u a n t u m baker's transformation, Ann. Phys., 207, 218-264, 1991. M.Ohya, Complexities and their applications to characterization of chaos, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 37, N o . l , 495-505, 1998. A.M.Ozorio de Almeida and M.Saraceno, Periodic orbit theory for the quantized baker's map, Ann. Phys., 2 1 0 , 1-15, 1991. M.Saraceno, Classical structures in the quantized baker transformation, Ann. Phys., 1 9 9 , 37-60, 1990. M.Saraceno and A.Voros, Towards a semiclassical theory of t h e q u a n t u m baker's m a p . Physica D, 7 9 , 206-268, 1994. R.Schack, Using a q u a n t u m computer to investigate q u a n t u m chaos, Phys. Rev. A, 5 7 , 1634-1635 ,1998. R.Schack and C M . C a v e s , Hypersensitivity to perturbations in the quant u m baker's m a p , Phys. Rev. Lett., 7 1 , 525-528, 1993. R.Schack and C M . C a v e s , Information-theoretic characterization of quant u m chaos, Phys. Rev. E., 5 3 , 3257-3270, 1996. R.Schack and C M . C a v e s , Shifts on a finite qubit string: A class of quant u m baker's m a p s , Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing, A A E C C 10, 305-310, 2000. Ya.G.Sinai, Introduction to Ergodic Theory, Fasis, Moscow, 1996. A. N. Soklakov and R. Schack, Classical limit in terms of symbolic dynamics for the q u a n t u m baker's m a p , e-print qunatu-ph/9908040. G.M.Zaslavskii, Stochasticity of Dynamical Systems, Nauka, Moscow, 1984. W.H.Zurek, Pointer basis of q u a n t u m a p p a r a t u s : Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?, Phys. Rev. D, 2 4 , 1516-1527, 1981.
Quantum Information IV (pp. 103-114) Eds. T. Hida and K. Saito © 2002 World Scientific Publishing Co.
POISSON NOISE ANALYSIS BASED ON THE LEVY LAPLACIAN
ATSUSHIISHIKAWA Graduate
School of Mathematics Meijo University Nagoya J, 68- 8502, Japan KIMIAKI SAITO
Department
of Information Sciences Meijo University Nagoya 4 68- 8502, Japan A L L A N U S H. T S O I
Department of Mathematics 202 Mathematical Sciences Building University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211, USA In this paper we discuss the Levy Laplacian acting on the space of Poisson noise functionals. In particular we introduce a semigroup generated by the Laplacian and give a stochastic expression of the semigroup.
Mathematics 1
Subject Classification
(2000):
60H40
Introduction
T h e Levy Laplacian was introduced by P. Levy 12 and was applied to the theory of generalized white noise functionals initiated by T. Hida 2 . This Laplacian has been studied by several authors within the framework of Gaussian white noise analysis (e.g. Refs. 1, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14-16). On the other hand the Poisson noise analysis has been also discussed in Refs. 3-8, 17, 18 and others. In t h e previous paper 1 7 , we introduced a domain of t h e Levy Laplacian to get the self-adjointness of the Laplacian on the domain. In this paper we introduce a domain consisting of Poisson noise functionals which are eigenfunctions of the Laplacian. The domain is larger t h a n the one given in Ref.17. We define an equi-continuous semigroup of class (C 0 ) generated by the Laplacian on this domain and give also a stochastic expression of the semigroup acting on t h e domain.
104 T h e paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we summarize some basic definitions and results in the Poisson noise analysis. In Section 3 we give the definition of the Levy Laplacian acting on Poisson noise functionals and also give eigenfunctions of t h e Laplacian. In Section 4 we introduce Hilbert spaces EJV I P depending on the parameters N G N and p G R related to weights of norms. T h e spaces consist of eigenfunctions in Section 3 and so these are suitable to act as domains of the Laplacian. For p € R , the following inclusion relations hold: • • • C EN+itP
c Ejv, P C • • • C E i i P c E 0 | P C • • • C E _ J V I P c E_jv-i,p C • • •
T h e Levy Laplacian becomes a self-adjoint operator densely defined on EJV, P for each J V e N and p 6 R , and an equi-continuous semigroup of class (Co) generated by the Laplacian is defined on the inductive limit space E_oo i P of Ejv, P , N G N , p G R . In the last section we give stochastic expressions of the semigroup generated by t h e Laplacian on the image space i / j E ^ p ] of the projective limit space Eoo ]P of EJV I P , N G N , p G R , by t h e ZY-transform and the semigroup generated by t h e Laplacian on t h e space E ^ p , respectively. 2
Preliminaries
In this section we summarize the basic definitions and results in Poisson noise calculus following Refs. 3 and 5 ( see also Refs. 4 and 6. ) We start with the following Gel'fand triple E = 5 ( R ) C L 2 ( R ) c E* =
S'(K),
where <S(R) is the space of rapidly decreasing functions defined on R , L2(R) is the Hilbert space consisting of square-integrable functions on R with norm | • |o, and <S'(R) is the dual space of <S(R), i.e. the space of tempered distributions. Let A — —(d/du)2 + u2 + 1. Then A is a densely defined self-adjoint operator on L 2 ( R ) and there exists an orthonormal basis {e^; k — 0 , 1 , 2 , . . . } C E for L 2 ( R ) satisfying Aek = 2(k + l)ek, k = 0 , 1 , 2 , . . . . For each p G R , we define |£| p = I^P^IO and let Ep = {£ G L 2 ( R ) ; |f|p < oo} for each p > 0 and let Ep be the completion of L 2 ( R ) with norm | • | p for each p < 0. We introduce the projective limit topology and the inductive limit topology of spaces Ep,p G R to E and E*, respectively. T h e Bochner-Minlos Theorem admits the existence of a probability measure fj, on E* whose characteristic functional is given by J
exp{i(x,
0)MX)
= exp [ f
( e l « ( u ) - l ) du
UE,
105 where (•, •) is the canonical bilinear form between E* and E. Let (L2) = L2(E*,(J,) be a Hilbert space consisting of complex-valued square-integrable functionals defined on a Poisson noise probability space (E*,fi). Take a sequence {r]n}™=1 c E converging to l( 0i t] in L 2 ( R ) for each t > 0 and to — l(t,o] i n L2(R) for each t < 0. T h e n the sequence { ( - , ^ T I ) } ^ L I converges to a Poisson noise functional N(t) = N.(t) in (L 2 ) and N(t) becomes a s t a n d a r d Poisson process defined on (E*,fi). T h e W-transform is defined by U
f ei^^tp(x)dfi(x), J E*
£ G E,
for each tp G ( L 2 ) , where C ( f ) = exp [/ R ( e ^ ^ - l ) du] , £ G £ . If we introduce an inner product (U
for
t o U = W[(L 2 )], then U is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space with kernel
T h e ^/-transform is an isomorphism from (L2) onto U . P u t Q(t) = N(t) — t. Then Q(t) is the compensated Poisson process and the space (L 2 ) has the Wiener-Ito decomposition: oo
(L2) = ®tfn, where Hn is a closed subspace of (L2) given by Hn = | l n ( / ) = J
/ ( u ) d Q ( m ) • • • dQ(u„); / G L 2 C ( R ) ® " | ,
where u = ( u i , . . . ,un) and L 2 -,(R)® n is the n-fold symmetric tensor product of the complexification L 2 -,(R) of L 2 ( R ) . T h e (L 2 )-norm \\
IMIo = I 53 n ! l^lii(R) s " 1 • T h e W-transform Utp of
n
M o = E / /n(u)n(«<£K)-i)^-
106 T h e second quantization operator T(A)
of A is densely defined on (L 2 )
by oo
r(A)
for f = £ ~ = 0 I „ ( / » ) . For pEB., be the domain of T(A)p. If p < respect to the norm || • || p . T h e n || • ||p. It is easy t o see t h a t for p (E)_p. Moreover, for any p £ R ,
let | M | p = | | r ( A ) ^ | | 0 . If p > 0, let (E)p 0, let {E)p b e the completion of (L 2 ) with (E)p,p G R , is a Hilbert space with t h norm > 0, the dual space (E)* of (E)p is given by we have the decomposition oo
71 = 0
where Hn is the completion of { I „ ( / ) ; / £ E^n} with respect to || • || p . Here n E^ is t h e n-fold symmetric tensor product of the complexification Ec of E. We also have Hnp) = { I „ ( / ) ; / £ E®^p} for any p e R , where E®Tp is also the n-fold symmetric tensor product of the complexification EQIP of Ep. T h e norm ||v?|| p of
IMIp=(E n! W)
- /«e^,
where the norm of EQ is denoted also by | • | p . T h e projective limit space (E) of spaces (E)p:p £ R is a nuclear space. T h e inductive limit space (E)* of spaces (E)p,p £ R is nothing but the dual space of (E). T h e space (E)* is called t h e space of generalized Poisson noise Junctionals. We denote by <§;•,• ^> the canonical bilinear form on (E)* x (E). Then we have «:$)¥p»=^n!(Fn,/„) 71 = 0
for any $ = £ ~ = 0 I „ ( F „ ) € (E)* and
w$(0=«<Mc»,
UE.
We have the following characterization theorem of the W-transform.
107 T h e o r e m 2 . 1 . Let F be a complex-valued function defined on EQ. Then F is the U-transform of some generalized functional if and only if there exists a complex-valued function G such that 1) for any £ and r\ in Ec, z G C, 2) there exist nonnegative
the function
constants
G(z£ + rf) is an entire function
of
K, a, and p such that
\G(£)\
V£ G
Ec,
3) F{Cl = G(e* - 1) for all £ G E. 3
T h e Levy Laplacian acting on Poisson noise functionals
Let $ be in (E)*. Then for the W-transform W$, there exists a complex-valued function G satisfying conditions 1), 2), 3) in Theorem 2.1. In particular, for any £ G E, the second variation of W$ is given by ^ " ( O f o - O = G"(e l « - l N x r ^ t C e * ) + G'(e l « - l ) ( i C e * ) ,
r,,(e£.
Fix a finite interval T of R . Take an orthonormal basis {Cnj^Lo C E for L2(T) satisfying the equally dense and uniform boundedness condition ( see Refs. 9, 12, 13). Let VL denote t h e set of all $ G {E)* such t h a t t h e limit ALU^)
= lim
-^X>*)"(0(Cn,C„) n=0
exists for any £ G Ec and is in U[(E)*}. Then we consider the Levy A i defined by
for $ G £>L- We denote a set of all functionals <& EVL for all r) G £ with supp(jy) C T c by 2?J.
such t h a t U$(i]) = 0
For any / G J5c™ with s u p p ( / ) C Tn, a Poisson noise functional y? = /
/(ui,...,u„)dAT(ui)---diV(u„)
is in D j and is equal to ^2 7= 0
-if
1 -v /
JTn
/(u)d<3(ui)"''
dQ(un-j)dun
Laplacian
108 Hence, the W-transform Utp of tp is given by
U
/(u)e if(ui) • • • e ^ - W
We p u t
D
" = { / - f^dNi-Ul^'''
diV
K); / e Ecn, suPP(/) c TA
for each n G N . Then for each n G N , D n is a linear subspace of (E) and therefore for —(p)
p G R , we can define a space D n
by the completion of D „ in (E)p with respect
to || • ||p. Define —(P) D 0 by the complex field C . T h e n for each n G N U {0} and —(p)
p G R, D n
becomes a Hilbert space with t h e inner product of (E)p. T h e Levy —(p)
Laplacian Af, becomes a linear operator defined on D n and p G R .
for each n G N U {0}
For each n G N U {0},p G R and tp G D ^ p ) , tfie
T h e o r e m 3.1.[Ref.l7] e<jiua£icm
holds.
4
A semi-group generated by the Levy Laplacian
If $ e ( £ ) * is expressed in t h e form £ ^ 1 0 $ „ , $ « e ^ p ) , n - 0 , 1 , . . . , then t h e expression is uniquely determined in {E)*. Then we can define the following spaces. if
Let aN(n)
- Ylt=* (|f|)
{
OO
for each N
G N U {0} and n G N U {0}. Set
OO
"\
^ ^ n ; ^ a ^ ( n ) | | ^ „ | | p < oo, tpn G D„ P , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , . . . S n=0
7i=0
J
for each JV G N and p G R . Then for any J V 6 N , EJV, P is in (-E) p and is a Hilbert space with norm ||| • |||JV ) P given by
(
oo
\
^QAf(n)||¥>n||M n=0
/
1
/
2
oo
,
(p=^2ipne.ENtP. n=0
109 P u t E Q Q ^ = fljvLi ^ff,p with the projective limit topology. For any TV 6 N U {0} and p G R , we define E_AT I P by the completion of Eoo, p with respect to norm ||| • | | | - w l P given by
(
oo
\ V2
^a A r(n)- 1 ||(^ n ||M ii=0
oo
, if = ] T ipn G E ^ p .
/
n=0
P u t E _ o o p = Ujv=i E_jv,p with the inductive limit topology. T h e n for p G R , we have the following inclusion relations: Eoo.p C • • • C E J V + I ) P C Ejy iP C • • • C E i ] P c E 0 i P C - C E
CE
C •••
C E — oo, P -
(p)
T h e space E ^ ^ includes D n for any n G N U {0} and p G R . T h e Laplacian A i can be extended to a continuous linear operator denned on E - ^ p into E_oo,p, denoted by the same notation A ^ , for each p G R . For each t > 0 and p G R , we consider an operator Gt on E_oo i P defined by
Gtip=J2e
t]%]
71=0
for ip = ^ ^ = o fn S E - o o ^ . Then we have the following: T h e o r e m 4 . 1 . [cf. Ref. 16] Let p G R. Then the family {Gt;t > 0} is an equi-continuous semigroup of class (Co) generated by AL as a continuous linear operator defined on E-oo p. Proof: Let p G R. For any $ G E - o ^ p , there exists AT G N such t h a t $ G E-N,P- Then, for any t > 0 t h e norm | | | G t $ | | | _ i v , P for $ = Y,7=o $ « e E - o o , P is estimated as follows:
2 P 71=00 OO oo
2 P n ==00
= 111$
2 -N,p-
110
Hence the family {Gt; t > 0} is equi-continuous in t. It is easily checked that G 0 = / , GtGs = Gt+s for each t, s > 0. We can also estimate that oo
| G t $ - G t o $ | | | 2 _ •N,p =
^ " ^ W
1e
-e
*\T\
'°m
\*r,
n=0 oo
<4^aJV(n)-1[|$n| 4|||$|
-N,p
< oo
for each t, t0 > 0. Therefore, by the Lebesgue convergence theorem, we get that lim G t $ — G ( o $ in
t—>t0
E-^p
for each to > 0 and $ £ E-oo :P . Thus the family {Gt;t > 0} is an equicontinuous semigroup of class (C 0 ). We next prove that the infinitesimal generator of the semigroup is given by A^,. For any <£ = Yln=o ^« ^ E_oo]P, there exists A f e N such that |||$|||_Ar,P < oo. We note that Gt$-$ t
= ^ajv+1(n) *
Ar$
-(JV+l),p
r
e
2
m -1
t
n=0
_n
"~ W\
By the mean value theorem, for any t > 0 there exists a constant 6 6 (0,1) such that \T\
<
\T\
Therefore we can estimate the following term:
*N +i W
1
e cm - 1
t
_n_ n
~ W\
= aN+i(n)
1
e
m -1
<4aw(n)-1||$„||2. By
n
iri
l*»l
111 and the Lebesgue convergence theorem, we obtain lim
G,$-$
2
= 0.
-A,,4
t-5-0
-(JV + l ) , p
Thus the proof is completed. 5
•
Stochastic expressions of t h e semigroup generated by the Levy Laplacian
Let {Xt\t given by
> 0} be a Cauchy process with the characteristic function of Xt
Take a smooth function rjT € E with TJT = TJTT on T. Let p £ R and set Gt = UGtU~x
on ^[Eoop] with the topology induced from E ^ p by the U-
transform. Then by Theorem 4.1, {Gt; t > 0} is an equi-continuous semigroup of class (Co) generated by the operator A ^ . Let { X ( ; t > 0} be an i5-valued stochastic process given by X t = £ + XtVT, £ & E. Then we have the following a stochastic expression of the operator Gt. T h e o r e m 5.1.
Let p be a real number.
Then we have
G > ( £ ) = E [ F ( X t ) | X 0 = f] for o l l F £ W [ E m i P ] . Proof: Using the similar m e t h o d in the proof of Theorem 7 in Ref. 16, we can obtain this theorem. • By Theorem 2.1 we can prove t h a t for $ and \& in (E)*, there exists a unique generalized Poisson noise functional whose W-transform is given by (U^)(U^). We call this generalized functional in (E)* the Wick product of $ and * in {E)*, denoted by $ o * , i.e. W ( $ o * ) = (W*)(W¥). Since for a; £ E* and rj £ E, t h e product e^a: is given by elT)x = x + (eIT? — l ) x , we can define a continuous linear operator Me,n on E ^ p characterized by M e i ,[o"=i(-, /i>](*) = ^ = i ( e 1 ^ , />> n £ N U {0}.
112 Here o? = 1 (-, fj) means (•, / j ) o • • • o (•, / „ ) and we note t h a t it is equal to /
/ i ( w i ) • • • fn(un)dNx(ui)
•••
dNx{un)
with s u p p ( / j ) c T , j = 1, 2 , . . . , n. T h e n we have the following. T h e o r e m 5.2. the equality
Let p be a real number. Gtip =
Then for any t > 0 and ip £ Eoo i P ,
E[MeixtnTip]
holds. Proof: P u t ip = JTn f\(ui)-• • fn{un)dN{ui)-•-dN(un) s u p p ( / ; ) G T, j — 1,2,.. . ,n. T h e n we have E[Me,xtr,Tlp(x)}
in E ^ p
=
E[*?=1{eiX,VT*,fi)}
=
E[e*ThX
= e~l^ip(x)
=
with
Gtip{x).
Let tp = ^ n = 0 tpn £ Eo^p. Then for any n £ N U {0}, ipn is expressed in the following form: Nc
Y,
<
fc„o"=i
(•'/!%)'
i
E,oo,p,
kl,...,fc„ = l
where (a^,
)fcXl...,*;„/ is a sequence of complex numbers and (/^ k)k,t is a
fc
sequence of functions in E^n.
Hence for any J V g N U {0}, we have
J2n\\\Me,Xt.T
M
Yvtnt-
lim
V aM fc1,...,fcn = l
J ] Ilk" l l l T V . p n=0
I
AXtr]Tl
Nt
oo
= V
.n
< OO.
o"
/• f[e] " N,p
M
hK
N,p
113 By the Schwarz inequality, ^ ^ L o E[|||M e .x e „ T (^ r l |||.| V | p] < oo for all N £ N U {0}. Therefore by the continuity of Gt we get t h a t oo
E[Me,xtVTip]
= ^E[Me.x„T^>„] 71=0 OO
= ^
Gt
n=0
= Gttp. Thus the proof is completed.
D
Acknowledgments This work was written based on the previous works K.S. and A.H.T. 17 and also K.S. 15 1 6 . This work was supported in p a r t by the Joint Research Project " Q u a n t u m Information Theoretical Approach to Life Science " for the Academic Frontier in Science and was also supported in part by J S P S - P A N Joint Research Project "Infinite Dimensional Harmonic Analysis" promoted by the Ministry of Education in J a p a n . T h e authors are grateful for the support.
References 1. D.M. Chung, U.C. Ji and K. Saito: Cauchy problems associated with the Levy Laplacian in white noise analysis, to appear in Journal of Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Q u a n t u m Probability and Related Topics, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1999). 2. T. Hida; Analysis of Brownian Functionals, Carleton M a t h . Lecture Notes, No.13, Carleton University, O t t a w a (1975). 3. T. Hida a n d N. Ikeda; Analysis on Hilbert space with reproducing kernel arising from multiple Wiener integral, in: Proc. 5th Berkeley Symp. on Math. Stat, and P r o b . Vol. II, P a r t 1 (1967) 117 -143. 4. K. Ito; Spectral type of the shift transformation of differential processes with stationary increments, Trans. Amer. M a t h . Soc. 81 (1956) 253-263. 5. Y. Ito; Generalized Poisson Functionals, P r o b a b . Th. Rel. Fields 77 (1988) 1-28. 6. Y.Ito and I. Kubo; Calculus on Gaussian and Poisson white noises, Nagoya M a t h . J. , Vol. I l l (1988) 41-84.
114 7. Y.G. Kondratiev, J.L. Da Silva, L. Streit and G.H. Us; Analysis on Poisson and G a m m a spaces, Infinite Dim. Anal. Q u a n t u m P r o b a b . Rel. Topics 1 (1998) 91-117. 8. Y.G. Kondratiev, L. Streit, W. Westerkamp and J.-A. Yan; Generalized functions in infinite dimensional analysis, HAS Report, No. 1995-002 (1995). 9. H.-H. Kuo; W h i t e noise distribution theory, CRC Press, Boca R a t o n (1996). 10. H.-H. Kuo, N. O b a t a and K. Saito; Levy Laplacian of generalized functions on a nuclear space, J. Funct. Anal. 94 (1990) 74-92. 11. H.-H. Kuo, N. O b a t a and K. Saito; Diagonalization of the Levy Laplacian and Related Stable Processes, submitted to Infinite Dim. Anal. Q u a n t u m P r o b a b . Rel. Topics (2001). 12. P. Levy; Lecons d'analyse fonctionnelle, Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1922). 13. N. Obata; W h i t e Noise Calculus and Fock Space, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1577, Springer-Verlag (1994). 14. K. Saito; A C 0 -group generated by the Levy Laplacian II, Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Q u a n t u m Probability and Related Topics Vol. 1, No. 3 (1998) 425-437. 15. K. Saito; A stochastic process generated by t h e Levy Laplacian, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 6 3 (2000) 363-373. 16. K. Saito; T h e Levy Laplacian and stable processes, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 12 (2001) 2865-2872. 17. K. Saito, K., A. H. Tsoi; T h e Levy Laplacian acting on Poisson noise functionals, Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics Vol. 2 (1999), 503-510. 18. A.H. Tsoi; L-transform, Normal Functionals and Levy Laplacian in Poisson Noise Analysis, Preprint (2000).
Quantum Information IV (pp. 115-126) Eds. T. Hida and K. Saito © 2002 World Scientific Publishing Co.
A H A U S D O R F F - Y O U N G INEQUALITY FOR W H I T E NOISE ANALYSIS HUI-HSIUNG KUO Department
of Mathematics, Louisiana State Baton Rouge, LA 70803, U.S.A.
University
KIMIAKI SAITO Department
of Information Sciences, Meijo Nagoya 468-8502, Japan
Department
of Mathematics, Northwestern Evanston, IL 60208-2730, U.S.A.
University
A U R E L STAN University
A Hausdorff-Young inequality and Young inequality are proven for White Noise Analysis. The Fourier transform from the classical case is replaced by the 5transform or the Segal-Bargmann transform.
1
INTRODUCTION
The classical Hausdorff-Young inequality [10] says the following: Theorem 1 Let n G N. / / 1 < p < 2 and 2 < q < oo such that ± + ± = 1, then the Fourier transform is a bounded linear map from L P (K") into L 9 (R"). This theorem is related to the following Young inequality [10]: Theorem 2 Let n £ N. Let 1 < p, q, r < oo such that 1 + 1 = 1 + 1. / / / e Lp(Rn) and g £ Lq(Rn), then their convolution product f *g is in Lr(Rn) and the following inequality holds:
ii/*siir
BACKGROUND
We present below the basic background from White Noise Analysis. more details see [7] and [9]. (a)Gel'fand triples
For
116 Let £ b e a real separable Hilbert space. We denote the norm of E by | • |o- Let A b e a densely defined self-adjoint operator on E, having a countable spectrum and whose eigenvalues {A„}„>i satisfy the following conditions: • 1 < Aj < A2 < A3 < • • •.
• ir =1 A„- 2
Vfe£.
(1)
117 Because £ is dense in E, we m a y define for any / £ E a r a n d o m variable (•, / ) on £'. This r a n d o m variable is normally distributed with mean 0 a n d variance | / | 2 . We call t h e probability space (£', n) a white noise space. We denote by (L 2 ) t h e space of all functions ip : £' —I C t h a t are measurable a n d square integrable with respect to t h e measure /J,, t h a t means J£l \ip(x)\2dfj.(x) < oo. Ec denotes t h e complexification of E, while Efn t h e space of all symmetric n-tensors in t h e space Efn. Throughout this paper a h a t above a tensor will denote t h e symmetrization of t h a t tensor. For example if u, v E Ec, then u®v = ( l / 2 ) ( u (g> v + v ® u). For any x 6 £' and n G N U {0} we define the Wick tensor : x®n : 6 £'®" by t h e formula: [»/2]
/
x
= Z(i)(>»-»)«(-Dk ®{n-2k)X®k x
fc=0
x
'
where r is t h e so-called trace operator, which is t h e unique linear bounded operator from £c ® £c into C such t h a t {T,Z<8>T)) = (t,T)),
Vf.fjGfc
2
For any ip G (L ) there exists a unique sequence {/„} n >o such t h a t Vn > 0, / „ 6 Ef",
and
n=0 2
T h e above equality is in t h e (L )-sense a n d from it we can easily calculate the (L 2 )-norm of t h e function
VII5
n=0 n
where | • |o denotes t h e £ ® - n o r m induced from t h e norm | • | 0 on E. We define the second quantization operator of A, denoted by r ( A ) , as a densely defined self-adjoint operator on (L2) in the following way: If*> = E r = o ( : - ® n : > / n ) , t h e n OO
r(AV=^(:-®":,^® B /«>. n=0
118 T h e operator T(A) has also a countable spectrum. Its eigenvalues satisfy the same conditions as those of the operator A except t h a t the smallest eigenvalue of T(A) is not strictly greater t h a n 1, but equal to 1. For any p > 0, we define (£p) = {
iM£ = X>!i/»ip<°°>
v
^°-
n=0
In the same way, any element
= $ > ! | F„ |2_p< oo.
H\\-P
n=0
If
e (£)* ^ d ^ = £ ~ = 0 < : •«» : , / „ ) G (£), then t h e oo
<(*,¥>» = 2 > ! < F „ , / n > . n=0
(7>J T/ie Exponential
Functions
and The
S-Transform
For any x G ££, w e define the renormalized exponential function in the following way: oo
{ x)
:e ' :=^2^(-.-®n:,x®n). n=0
:e^',x':
119 A simple calculation shows t h a t , for any p £ R , \\:e^:\\p
= e ^ .
(2)
Hence for any x G £'c, we have : e ' ' , z ' : G (£)*• Moreover, it follows from (2) t h a t -.e^'^-.e (L2) if a n d only if x G Ec, and :e< ,,ae) : G (£) if a n d only if x G felt is also easy to check t h a t if x G £ c and £ G £ c , then ( ( : e < - ' * > : , : e « > : ) ) = e<*'«>.
For any £ G Ec, we have: : e <*,«>._ e <>:,0-(i/2)<«,0_
T h e renormalized exponential functions {:e(''&: \ £ G £c} are linearly independent and span a dense subspace of (£). For any $ 6 (£)*, the S-transform of $ is the function S ( $ ) : £ c -> C denned by
S($)(0 = «*,:e<--«>:»,
£ G £c.
Since t h e renormalized exponential functions span a dense subspace of (£), t h e S-transform is injective. T h a t means, if $ , $ G (£)* such t h a t S ( $ ) = S(tf), then $ = * . For $ G ( £ 2 ) , t h e S-transform of $ is also called the Segal-Bargmann transform of $ . (c) The Wick
product
T h e Wick product of two generalized functions $ and ty in (£)*, denoted by $ o $ , is the unique generalized function in (£)* such t h a t :
S ( $ o * ) = (S$)(S#). T h e mapping (>, t/>) H-» 0 o i/> is continuous from (£) x (£) into (£). It is also continuous from (£)* x (£)* into (£)*. If y = E ^ 0 < : -®n : , / „ ) G (£) and V- = £ r = o < : -®" :,fln> G (£), then
n=:0
p+q=n
120 3
HAUSDORFF-YOUNG INEQUALITY FOR WHITE NOISE ANALYSIS
A starting point in formulating a Hausdorff-Young inequality is t h e following theorem established by t h e contribution of Kondratiev [3], Kree [4, 5, 6], a n d Lee [8]. T h e o r e m 3 The S-transform is a unitary operator from (L2) onto the Hilbert space rlL2(Ec,m) consisting of all holomorphic functions f : Ec —> C such that || / | | 2 = supljp, \f(z)\2dmp(z)} < oo, with the supremum being taken over all finite dimensional subspaces F of Ec. If F = Cn, then dmp(z) = (•7r)_n exp[— |z| 2 ]
real number q, we define the space:
oo
! //
V =
oo
£"=„(=
n=0B
-®
:./»>
e
(L»),
^
(f) n " ! l/«lo < °° •
n=0
iAen we de/ine
||
J
p
12
ll(q)._
E~=o(f)"»!|/-l8D e f i n i t i o n 5 For am/ rea/ number q > 1, we define the space HLq(Ec,m) consisting of all holomorphic functions f : Ec —> C such that || / ||?i = sup{f_ \f[z)\qdmF(z)y < oo, with the supremum being taken over all finite dimensional subspaces F of Ec. If F = C™, then dmp(z) = (7r) _ ™e~' z ' dz, where dz = dxdy, for z — x + iy G C " , x, y G R". O b s e r v a t i o n 6 f o r any <7i, 92 G R s w c ^ ^ ffl * ° < 9i < 92, ( £ , : ! ) C ( £ ? 1 ) - / / ¥?G (L« 2 ), then || v? || ( q i ) < ||
II ^
II',] =
SU
e
is a bounded
( L ")-
\S(p{z)\qdmF(z) J-
P\
= sup < / \S(ip o ip o • • • o V
k times
ip)(z)\2dm,F{z)
W e
have:
121 By Theorem 3 we have: sup < / \S(<po<po- •• oip)(z)\2dmF{z) JF
'
v k times
\
> = || ipoipo-
'
•• o ip ||Q .
v k times
'
'
T h u s , we obtain: II Sip \\q[q] = || ipoipo
•••op
\\l
k times
= £n! n=0
E »i+*aH
^En! n=0
/
E Lti+t2H
l/ii®/i,®"'®/n Hfc=n
Since the symmetrization operator is a projection operator, we have: l/ii<8>/*a<8» • - • <8>/«fc|o < | / n ® / « , ® " - < 8 > / d o Hence we get:
S^"9
[9]
<£n!
.»i+«j-|
oo
= En=0 oo
=£
i/ii ® /<
E
n—0
•••®/u|o
hifc = n T 2
!
E .«l+ijH
l/«i|o|/ij|o ••• | / u | o htfc=n
E
^l/iilo|/i,k--|/Jo
.«i+»H
E
Nk=n
E
V • r T
n = 0 Lti+t 2 H
• ,V/^i|/nloV/^|/i2|o---\Afc!|/iJo
hik=n
Applying the Cauchy-Bunyakovskii-Schwarz inequality we get:
E
E
71 — 0 .11+12-I
hu =™
ii!i 2 !---ife!
V ^ l / i i lo V^-lfi,
lo • • • V ^ l / u |o
OO
<E n=0 ii+tj-l
E
E hu=n
»i+»j-l
*i!|/lJo*2!|/i2lo---^!|/ulohu=n
122 Hence we obtain:
II SV ||f„ oo
sE
E
n=0t,+i2H
%i
h«k=n
2o
'
= y:(i+i+---+i)"
= Efen n=0 oo
E ii+iH
n=0 ii+t2H fc
•A «i+iH
E >i+«2H
fc times
Hk=Ti
E
• • • Zl>
'
HViAW.\fiAl---ik\\fik\l h»k=n h»k=n
Mii/^isi2!i/ijg ••• ikVi«Jo k Mk=n
»i!iAlis*a!iA,is ••• w j s
htfc=Ti
oo
i = l iJ=0 oo
£(i)'«i/.e = IMI?.) • Thus we obtain: Sp | | H < || ip ||(,) .
(3)
This proves t h a t t h e linear operator S : (L 9 ) —» ~HLq{Ec,m) is continuous and its operatorial norm || 5 || satisfies the inequality || S ||< 1. To see t h a t || S ||= 1, let's consider the function ip = e^''v', where r\ S E, |r/|o = 1. Let F b e the one dimensional complex vector subspace of Ec spanned by r). We have: oo
Hif„ = E (!)"-•
-Edrf lH5
= e ^
123
Hence || ip \\(q) — e*. We have: II S || • || v || ( „ > || Stp | | w V?
-\nfF lS^)l"<W(0
1/?
= \lj |e<"-«|'d^(0 1/9
= f~ /" |e<"'z'»>|«e-lz,'l2dz =
[\e*\<>e-^dz1/9
\i
y|9P-^2-y2da.dj/
1/9
L ^ ./1R ./R
l
= \ ff'
1/9
•ixe-x2-y2dxdy
L71" J R ./M
eVe-V+9^-^
LVWK
dx-= —
// 'e - " dy
1/9
1/9
7-A
-(-iYdx
3
= imi»Hence || S ||> 1 and so || S ||= 1. Therefore we have proved the theorem for any q 6 {2, 4, 6, • • •}. • If B : E —> E is a bounded linear operator, then we may define the second quantization operator of B, denoted by T(B), as a densely-defined operator on (L 2 ), in the following way: if
rU/f/]v
(4)
124 Thus the last theorem can be rephrased in the following natural number q and for any if £ (Lq), S
¥> \\[q] <
way: for any
r\Jii)v>
even
(5)
T h e following theorem is a n analog of t h e classical Young inequality. T h e o r e m 9 Let p, q, and r be strictly positive numbers such that - + - = -. If ip £ (Lp) and tp € (L9), then £ (Lr) and the following inequality holds:
(6)
Proof. Let
II V o V» ||?r)
n—0 oo
-£(£)"*
53 /«®5*
n=0 oo
^5Z©"n! ra=0 oo
- S(D =
1 3 l/«®0»lo L"U+f=n
n!
£ l/«®S»lo
n=0 oo
|_u+i>=n T
71=0
/u-f-u=n
£(D"n! £
= £(£)"
IUIU n!
_ii+v=n
/2\
u!u! y p
u
/2
x t
'
(f)^|A|o/(ff^k|o
Applying t h e Cauchy-Bunyakovskii-Schwarz inequality we obtain:
125
Thus, we have:
^G)rE^G)"a)'i:(i)>/.B i H* =f:(i)'(; + j)"E(f)'-i/.B(!r-w -t(i)"(;)"E(i)'-l/.B(§)--W5 oo
= E E (?)"««(§)"i« = E(|)"«n«E(l)"*.K u=0
t>=0
= IMI( P )IIV>|l( g )D References 1. Bargmann, V.: On a Hilbert space of analytic functions and an associated integral transform, P a r t I; Communications of Pure and Applied Mathematics 2 4 (1961) 187-214. 2. Gross, L. and Malliavin, P.: Hall's transform and the Segal-Bargmann map; in "Ito's Stochastic Calculus and Probability Theory", N. Ikeda, S. W a t a n a b e , M. Fukushima, and H. Kunita (eds.), 73-116, Springer-Verlag, 1996. 3. Kondratiev, Yu. G.: Nuclear spaces of entire functions in problems of infinite-dimensional analysis; Soviet Math. Dokl. 22 (1980) 588-592. 4. Kree, P.: Solutions faibles d'equations aux d'erivees functionnelles, I; Lecture Notes in Math. 4 1 0 (1974) 142-181, Springer-Verlag. 5. Kree, P.: Solutions faibles d'equations aux d'erivees functionnelles, II; Lecture Notes in Math. 4 7 4 (1975) 16-47, Springer-Verlag. 6. Kree, P.: Calcul d'integrales et de derivees en dimension infinie; J. Fund. Anal. 3 1 (1979) 150-186.
126 7. Kuo, H. H.: White Noise Distribution Theory, Probability a n d Stochastic Series, C R C Press, Inc. 1996. 8. Lee, Y.-J.: A characterization of generalized functions on infinitedimensional spaces and Bargmann-Segal analytic functions; in "Gaussian r a n d o m Fields", K. It6 and T. Hida (eds.) (1991) 272-284, World Scientific. 9. O b a t a , N.: White Noise Calculus on Fock Space, Lecture Notes in M a t h . 1 5 7 7 , Springer-Verlag (1994). 10. Reed, M. and Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II: Fourier Analysis, Self-adjointness, Academic Press, 1975. 11. Segal, I. E.: Tensor algebras over Hilbert spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 1 (1956) 106-134. 12. Segal, I. E.: Mathematical characterization of t h e physical vacuum for a linear Bose-Einstein field, Illinois J. Math. 6 (1962) 500-523. 13. Segal, I. E.: T h e complex wave representation of the free Boson field; in "Topics in functional analysis: essays dedicated to M.G. Krein on t h e occasion of his 70th birthday", Advances in Mathematics: Supplementary Studies (I. Gohberg and M. Kac, eds.), vol.3, Academic Press, New York, 1978, p p . 321-344.
Quantum Information IV (pp. 127-145) Eds. T . Hida and K. Saito © 2002 World Scientific Publishing Co. THE CLARK F O R M U L A OF GENERALIZED
WIENER
FUNCTIONALS
YUH-JIA LEE* Department of Applied Mathematics National University of Kaohsiung Kaohsiung, TAIWAN 811 H S I N - H U N G SHIH f Center of General Education Rung Shan University of Technology Tainan, TAIWAN 710 The Clark formula is reformulated on the classical Wiener space for a large class of generalized Wiener functional via the idea of white noise analysis. The underlying spcae is taken to be the Gel'fand triple E C C C E* associated with the space C of Cameron-Martin functions. Then we adapt the space £Q of analytic function of exponential growth as the space of test functionals in the construction of the space £Q of generalized Wiener functionals. It is shown that the S-transform SF of a generalized Wiener functionals F satifies the following formula SF(V)
= <(F, 1 ) ) ^ + / iJo at
SF(Pt(r,))dt,
which follows easily from the fundamental theorem of calculus, where n £ Ec, the complexification of E, and Pt{n)(s) = J7(min{s, (}). The the Clark formula follows immediately.
1
Introduction
T h e representation of functionals of Brownian motion by stochastic integral with respect to Brownian motion, known as t h e Clark formula, was first studied in [l] a n d later in [20, 5]. I t was generalized t o weakly differentiable functionals on t h e classical Wiener space C by Ocone [20] via Malliavin calculus. Later, it was generalized t o Malliavin distributions in [6, 22]. T h e first reformulation of t h e Clark formula using H i d a calculus (or w h i t e noise analysis) has been done in [2]. In this p a p e r we are devoted to t h e reformulation of t h e Clark formula on t h e classical Wiener space for a class of generalized Wiener functional via "^RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY THE NATIONAL SCIENCE COUNCIL OF TAIWAN
128 the idea of white noise analysis. T h e underlying spcae is taken to be the Gel'fand triple E C C C E* with a chain of Hilbert spaces Ep with the norm \x\p = \K~p/2x\o, where C is the Cameron-Martin space, Kx(t)
=
mm{s,t}x(s)ds,
x£L2[0,l],
Jo Ep is t h e domain of K~p'2 for any p > 0, and E = n p > 0 Ep is t h e projective limit of Ep's. T h e dual space of Ep is denoted by E_p. To construct t h e generalized Wiener functional, for p > 1, let £p be the space of functionals / defined on £ L p such t h a t (1) / has a analytic extension / to the complexification i ? - p , c of
E-p,
(2) There exist constants c,c' such t h a t |/(.z)| < c e x p { c ' | z | _ p } for z G
E-PtC.
Denote by £Q the corresponding space defined on C similarly as above . Set Eva = flp^j^p. £oo is t h e collection of analytic version of members of the Yan-Meyer space and we have t h e follwing relations £ „ C £P C £0 C L2[C, fi] C £; C £*p C
C
where /J, is t h e Wiener measure on C and £,*>* denote t h e dual space of £oo . Members of £* and £^ are called generalized Wiener functionals. In this paper we show t h a t the S'-transform SF of a generalized Wiener functionals F G £Q satisfies t h e following formula
SF(r,) = ((F, 1))^ + J j t SF(Pt(r,)) dt, which follows easily from the fundamental theorem of calculus, where 77 £ Ec, the complexification of E and Pt(r])(s) = r7(min{s, t}). T h e Clark formula of generalized Wiener functionals in ££ follows immediately. In particular, for ip 6 £1, we obtain ip(x) = E [ < ^ ] + /
H[D(p(x) l\t,i] I Tt ] dB(t; x)
fx-almost all x on C,
Jo where the integral is the Wiener-Ito stochastic integral. T h e following notations will be used frequently in this paper. Notations. 1. For a real linear space V, Vc denotes the complexification of V.
129 2. For each continuous function x on [0,1], x(t), x(t), x^p'(t) are respectively the first, second, and p-th order derivatives of x with respect to t £ [0,1], if they exist. 3. For a n-linear operator T on a complex normed space X, T(z,... , z) (n copies) for each z £ X.
Tzn
:•=
4. For any Hilbert space H, \\ • \\HSn^H^ denotes the n-linear Hilbert-Schmidt operator norm and || • ||,c»(#) t h e n-linear operator norm over H. 2
A G e l ' f a n d t r i p l e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e classical W i e n e r s p a c e
Let C b e the collection of all real-valued continuous functions x on [0,1] vanishing at zero and the subclass C' of C consist of all absolutely continuous functions x with x E L2[0,1]. Then C is a Banach space with the sup-norm | • |oo and C is a Hilbert space with norm | • |o = \ / ( - , -)o and the inner product (-,-)o defined by (x, y)Q — L x(t)y(t)dt. T h e space C is usually called the Cameron-Martin space and it is well known t h a t (C',C) forms an abstract Wiener space (AWS, for abbreviation). T h e dual space C* of C, may be identified as a dense subspace of C given as follows Fact 2 . 1 . 2 3 ' 1 7 C* = J x £ C : x is right continuous and of bounded variation with x{\) = 0 By this identification, whenever x £ C and y £ C*,
(x,y)=
- f
x(t)dy(t),
Jo where (•, •) is the C-C* pairing. In particular, if x £ C , (a;, y) = (x, Let K be a bounded linear operator on L 2 [0,1] defined by Kx(t)=
/
(sAt)x(s)ds,
y)0.
i£L2[0,l],
Jo where s At denotes the minimum of s and t. T h e n K is a positive self-adjoint compact operator having a complete orthonormal basis (CONS, for abbreviation) consisting of functions {en(t) = \ / 2 sin(n — l/2)-7rt : n = 1 , 2 , . . . } with the corresponding eigenvalues given by { l / ( ( n — l/2)7r) 2 : n — 1, 2 , . . . }. For n £ N, let /„(*)=
y/Ken(t),
t£[0,l].
(2.1)
Observe t h a t , for each n £ N and for t £ [0,1], e „ ( l - t) = ( - l ) n + 1 fn(t), then, by Fact 2.1, {/ n : n £ N} C C*. Moreover, {/„ : n £ N} is also a CONS
130 of L 2 [0,1]. Thus, {/„ : n G N} is a CONS of C. Let A b e t h e inverse operator of \/K on C. Then A is self-adjoint densely defined on C and A fn = A n / „ for each n g N , where A n = (n — 1/2) 7r For any p > 0, let i? p b e the domain of Ap. Then Ep is a real Hilbert space with the norm \x\p = \Apx\0 (C' = Eo) and {(1/A P ) / „ : n G N} forms a CONS of Ep. The increasing family {| • | p : p > 0} of norms are compatible and comparable; and the embedding from Ep+a into Ep is of Hilbert-Schmidt type whenever a > 1/2. Next, let E_p b e t h e completion of C with respect to the norm \x\-p = |^4 _p a;|o- Then E-p is a Hilbert spaces with a CONS {A£ f„:ne N } . Identify z G £ £ with £ ~ = i (a, / „ ) / „ G £ _ p , where (•, •) is the E*-Ep pairing. £ L p becomes the dual space of Ep. Set E = n p > 0 Ep as the projective limit of .E p 's. Then E is a nuclear space with the dual E* = U p > 0 £ - p and E C C C E* forms a Gel'fand triple . Observe t h a t , for x £ C a n d p > 1,
n=l
n=l
Jo
V^O
x ( t ) 2 dt < \x I 2
/
•
I co-
l t follows t h a t C C E-p for all p > 1. Furthermore, by t h e denseness of C in C and in E-p, we have the following chain of continuous inclusion: EcEpcEqcE1=LZcC
cC
cCcL2
= E-iCE-qC
E-p
C E*,
2
w h e r e p > q > 1 and L2 denotes t h e space L [0,1]. For notational convenience, we will use the notation (-, •) to stand for all the dual pairings of E*-E, E-p-Ep (p > 1), and C-C*. Let »o and i _ p be respectively t h e embeddings from C into C and E-p with p > 1. Then ( C ' , B _ p , i _ p ) is a AWS. Let \i and H-p, p > 1, b e the abstract Wiener measures of C and E-p respectively. Then t h e measurable support of ^t_ p is contained in C and, for any integrable complex-valued function
ip(x) fj,_p(dx)
JE-„
—
/ tp(x)
n(dx).
Jc
P r o p o s i t i o n 2.2. Forp € N, Ep is the class consisting of all functions x € C' with the property: (i) x, x,... , a;' p ' are absolutely continuous with x ^ p + 1 ' S L 2 [0,1] and (ii) z(2fc>(0) = z ( 2 f c + 1 ' ( l ) = 0 for k = 0 , 1 , . . . , [ p / 2 ] . Moreover, (x, y) — -
/
Jo
x(t)dy(t)
for x £ L2 and y G Ep.
(2.2)
131 Proof. Denote by U the class of functions satisfying the conditions (i) and (ii). We shall show t h a t U = Ep. Let y be in Ep. Then y = E ^ L i (l/> fn)o fn in Ep(c defined as in (2.1). Since en = A„ en for each n G N,
C), where / n ' s are
oo
y(t)=
£
(1/A„)(y,/„>oCn(0
(in L2)
n=l
=
£
A„(y, / „ ) 0 /
e„(s)ds
(in L 2 ) ,
£ G [0,1].
Let yx = 2^°=i A n ( y , fu)oen. Then y, G L 2 and y(t) Jt yl(s)ds for all t G [0,1]. T h u s y is absolutely continuous with y ( l ) — 0 and y=yl. As p > 2, let t/2 = E ^ L i A« (^; /n)o e n - T h e n this series converges to y2 in L 2 and y(t)=
!/.(*)=
/" y 2 ( ^ ) ^ , Jo
ie[0,l].
It implies t h a t j / is absolutely continuous with y(0) = 0 and j / 3 ' = y2 £ i j . Continuing in this way, it is easy to see t h a t Ep C U. To show t h a t U C Ep, let j / G *7 be arbitrarily given. Then y ( p + 1 ) G 2 L [0,1] and hence oo
E
I
/
!/
(f+1)
\
1 _ (-l)P
/•!
W ^ cos(
-
J
2
—ir-(n-l/2)'irt)dt
<+oo.
n = l | Jo
Applying integration by parts formula, we see t h a t E ^ L i tf? (y> /n)o < + ° o . T h a t is, y G i? p . This proves t h a t U = £ p . Finally, from Fact 2.1 it follows t h a t for x G C and y G -Ep,
{x,y)=
f x(t)dy(t) = -f Jo
x(t)y(t)dt. Jo
Extending x to the whole space L 2 by continuity, we obtain the formula (2.2). •
C o r o l l a r y 2 . 3 . The nuclear space E consists of all real-valued almost everywhere differ•entiable functions x defined on [0,1] suchn that x'-2 > (0) = 2fc 1 + )(l) = 0 for each k G N U {0}. a;( It follows from the definition of the | • | p - n o r m t h a t we have
132 Corollary 2.4.
(i) ForpeN
and x G Ep, \x\2p = J* |a;(P +1 )(<)| 2 dt
(ii) For x E L2 and p G N, 2
laslip-i =
/ / •••/ / / J0 I Jap Jts JO Jti
x{s)dsdt1dt2---dtp-1
where ap — tp and bp = 1 if p is odd; ap = 0 and bp — tp if p is even. 3
T h e spaces of test and generalized functions
If V is a real normed space with the | • |y-norm, then the | • Iv^-norm of Vc is given by \x + iy\vc = sup{||e , e (a; + i3/)||v e : 0 € [0, 2n]} for x,y 6 V, where ||ac + iy\\\r = \x\\r + \y\y. In general, || • \\vc is a quasi-norm and for any i , i / £ V, we have t h e inequality: ||a: + *2/||ve < \x + iy\vc
<
IF +
iy\\vc-
Note t h a t when V is a Hilbert space, the quasi-norm || • Hv^ coincides with the | • 114-norm. In this section, we construct test functionals on t h e AWS (C',C) and the AWS ( C , -E_p) for p > 1. For notational simplicity, we use t h e symbols | • l ^ and | • | _ p to stand also for | • \cc and \-\E^ C, respectively. For a fixed Banach space B which is either C or £-p, let £(B) be the class of those functions ip defined on C so t h a t ip has an analytic extension ip(z) to Bc and satisfies the exponential growth condition: |<£>(;z)| < c e x p { c ' | z | s e } for some constants c,c' > 0. It is clear t h a t £(B) C L2(C,fi) by the Fernique theorem (see [7]). For m G N and ip G £(B), define |M|Cm(B)=
sup{\lp(z)\e-m^^
: z G Bc}.
Let £m(B) = {
as p > q > 1,
where E^ is topologized as the projective limit of {£p}. T h u s a sequence {
133 For / 6 L2[C,[i], the Wiener-Ito decomposition theorem (see [8]) assures t h a t / can be decomposed into an orthogonal direct sum of multiple Wiener integrals / „ ( / ) of order n, n £ N. Let fj. * f b e the convolution of / and \i defined on C, i.e., /i * f(h) = Jc f(h + y) fi(dy) for h £ C. Then /i * / is infinitely Frechet-differentiable in t h e directions of C' and In{f) can be represented by / „ ( / ) = L 2 [C,/i]-lim
i
Jc Dnfx*f(0)(Pk(-)
+
iPk(y)r^(dy)
(see [10, 12]), where Z?" denotes the n - t h Frechet derivative in the directions = Yl)=i {z, fj) fj
of C and Pk(z)
for z
°°
f
G E*. Moreover, 1
/ |/(x)|V(^)= E -||^V*/(o)||2H5»(c.)Next, we briefly describe t h e space (E) of test functionals, which was introduced by Meyer and Yan (see [16, 19]). For m £ N and p > 1, define the II • ||m,p-norm on L 2 [C,/i] by oo
1
ll/ll^,P= E ^IU>V*/(o)|lW_,)71 = 0
''
(3-i)
l
Denote by {E)m>p the class of functions / in L2[C,fi] so t h a t | | / | | m , p < + o o . Then {[E)m
whenever p > q > 1.
Obviously, each member / of (E) satisfies oo
E n=0
l
-T||0>*/(O)|&s»(i5_J>)<+oo n
forallp>l.
-
According to the work by Lee [13, 15], there exists a unique analytic function / defined on E* such t h a t f — f (J.-almost everywhere on Cc and
/(*)=
E i / ^ * / > + «'y)VW.
Z
^K,
n=o n\ Jc where the series converges absolutely and uniformly on bounded subsets of E*. f £ £00 and the space E^ is exactly the collection of analytic version of members of (E). We reformulate t h e related results and growth estimates as follows.
134 Theorem 3.1.
16
(i) Let f be in (E). For any p>l,
let mp £ N so that f £ (E)m
iP.
Then
ll/IUn.,., < Cm, \\f\\smp,p,
(3.2)
m y
where cm — Jc e \ \°° n(dy) for any m £ N. (ii) Let f be in EQO. For any p > 1, let mp £ N so that
I M | m „ p - < 0mptP\\f\\€mp,p, where f3m (iii)
p
is a constant
depending
(3.3)
only on p and mp.
The mapping if —> /j, * tp is a homeomorphism let if be assumed as above. Then
from E^ onto E^. In fact,
(!/<*) I M I ^ , . , < |M *
(3.4)
mp
e .
(iv) Sao C (E) and 8^ = (E) as vector spaces, where (E) = {/ : / £
(E)}.
Proof. T h e statements (i), (ii), a n d (iv) follow from [16: Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.4]. For t h e statement (iii), it is obvious t h a t \\fj, *
l/(*)l<
E n=o
- / n:
|Z?nV(0)(z + iyr|/x(d2/)
7c
< I M U „ P . P Jc e x p { e m - ( | z | _ p + | y | _ p ) } /i(dy). Dividing b o t h sides of t h e above estimation by e fc l z l-», we obtain (3.4).
D
135
Example 3.2. (1) F o r / i , / 2 , . . . ,/„ 6 C, define : fi---fn
• {x)= / f[{x + iy,
fj)n{dy).
Jc j=i Then : j \ • • • fn :
G L 2 (C, /i). It is worth to note t h a t M / i ® " - ® fn)
=
•h---Jn--
Moreover, for r ? i , . . . ,r]n G Ec, we have • rji • • rj„ : G £oo(2)
T h e exponential vector functional e(r]) associated with r\ £ Ec which is given by
e(»j)= e x p | ( - , » , ) - | jT 77(t) 2 d*j. Then 6(77) G £ooFor more examples, we refer the reader to [17]. Remark 3.3. (a)
Identify (E) with £00, then Theorem 3.1 implies t h a t two families of norms {|| • ||m )P } and {|| • \\e } are equivalent. In other words, t h e space £x is equivalent to t h e Yan-Meyer space (E).
(b)
Let / j / s be functions as given in (2.1). T h e n for any ip G £oo, t h e series
E -
E
D«» *
fu ••(*)},
converges to y> in £00 and, for any p > 1, the series also converges absolutely and uniformly on each bounded set of E-pc. As a consequence, the linear space V spanned by all cylinder polynomials of the form 0((-,77i),... , (-,»7n)) for any n G N U {0} is dense in £00 and in £p for p > 1, where
whenever p > g > 1.
136 Members of £^0 will b e referred as the generalized Wiener functionals . Next, let ((•, -)) 0 , ((•, -)) p , and ((•, -^oo stand for the dual pairing of £Q-£Q, £p-£p, and E^-Soo, respectively. E x a m p l e 3.4. Denote by Llxp[C,/j] / denning on (C, B(C)) such t h a t J f(x)emW°°
the space of all measurable functions
n(dx)
for all m 6 N.
By the Fernique theorem, L* xp [C,ju] can be regarded as a subspace of £Q by identifying each / £ L\ [C,fi] with the functional Gf defined by {(Gf,
J
f{x)
for if £ £Q. Members of Ll [C,JJ\ will b e called regular generalized Wiener functionals. For more examples we refer the reader to [17]. Denote the dual space of (E) by (E)* which is endowed with the weak*topology and let ((•, •)) denote the dual pairing of (E)* and (E). D e f i n i t i o n 3.5. The S-transform valued functional on Ec by SF{r1)=
SF
of F £ £^
((F, eir,)))^
is defined as a
complex-
r, £ Ec.
2
We remark that as F £ L (C,/x), SF = y, * F. Since (E) is dense in (E)p for any p > 1, (E) becomes the reduced topological projective limit of {{E)p}. Then, by [4: Theorem 6, p p 290], (E)* = U p >i (E)* on which t h e inductive limit topology is endowed. This implies t h a t if F £ (•£)*> t n e n there exists p > 1 so t h a t F £ (E)*, t h e dual of (E)p. Since ( £ ) * = n ^ ^ E ) ^ , we have the following P r o p o s i t i o n 3.6. any m £ N,
16
Let F he in (E)*.
Then there exists p > 1 so that for
So (^ll D " S F WH a *5-(- F )<+°°-
(3-5)
According to Theorem 3.1, t h e embedding j : £<*> —> (E) is continuous. So t h a t , for any G £ ( £ ) * , G o j £ £^. T h u s (E)* can be identified as a subspace of £^0. Conversely, for a fixed F £ £^, define a functional F on (E) by
((F, /)) := «F, /»«,,
/ e (£),
137 where / is t h e analytic version of / on E*. It follows from Theorem 3.1 t h a t F£{E)*. Recall t h a t a functional G on Ec is analytic if it satisfies t h e following two conditions: (A-l) for all 77, (/> S EC1 the one complex variable mapping C 9 A \-¥ G(r] + A
that
for
any
c
>
0,
sup{|Gfa)|
:
T h e following theorem characterizes the generalized functionals in £^ terms of its S'-transforms.
in
T h e o r e m 3.7. Let F E £ ^ be fixed. Then the S-transform analytic function on Ec such that the number 00
"m,-P(F)~
i:
m
SF of F is an
2 n
j-^\\DnSF(0)\\2Hsn{Ep).
(3.6)
n=0 V J
is finite. Conversely, suppose that G is an analytic function defined on Ec and satifies the condition (A-2) for some p > 1. Let q be sufficiently large so that e2 • E i = i \ < 1- Then there exists a unique F £ £ ^ such that nm^q(F) < + 0 0 and SF = G, where Xj = (j - (1/2))TT for j £ N. Proof. T h e first assertion follows from Theorem 3.1 (or Remark 3.3), Proposition 3.6, and the following identities: 00
SF(r,) = E
1
r
-
n=o "•
00
E
_
fa,
/ * ) • • • fa, fjJ
i(F, : fn
_
")
• • • />„ : )>oo •
lii,...,j„=i
J
(3.7) and £)"5 J P(0)(r ? 1 , . . . , , , „ ) =
E
fai,
/ * ) • • • fan, / ; „ ) ((F, : fh
• • • fJn : » „ . (3.8)
To prove the second assertion. Let G is an analytic function on Ec. For any m G N, since G is locally bounded, there is a positive number M m so t h a t |Gfa)| < Mm provided t h a t |»7|p < m, 77 £ Ec. By the Cauchy integral
138 formula, \\DnG(0)\\Cn{Ep)
< Mrnnn/mn
for each n G N. Then
x\D-G(0)Vh,..., oo
< Mlc*
„2n
f
oo
feaf
n=0 V n+
/
li,)\'\ „,
, \
n
A-2"-rtV<+oo,
j= l
/
2
where c = s u p { n ^ / ' / ( e ™ n!) : n e N} < +00 by the Stirling formula (see [8]). Next, for
1
(
«*»>«,= £ - {
00
£
^V^(o)(/ J - 1) ...,/ > jz?»G(o)(/ >1) ...,/,-j
n=o n- L >i,... , i „ = i
By Theorem 3.1, F £ C i and it is clear t h a t SF = G. • R e m a r k 3 . 8 . Let TX{EP) for p € R b e t h e class of analytic functions on EPyC such t h a t 00
\n
ll/im*,) = E -rllc/WH^^) < +00, n=0
"••
called t h e space of Bargmann-Segal analytic functions on EPiC with parameter A > 0. T h e n Lee [13, 15] has shown t h a t ^OO,A = n p > ! TX(E.P)
c T\E-P)
C Tx{E-q)
C J- A (£J,) C T\EP)
c L2(C,M) C Up>x ^ A ( £ p ) =
5(^)A),
P>9>1, s
where -Aoo,A i t h e projective limit of { . ^ A : P > 1} and «4 P ,A'S are Banach space of analytic functions / on E* with the || • \\_& A -norm given by H/H.4,,,, = s u p { | / ( z ) | e - ^ / ( 2 A ) ) l z | - » : z £ £ _ p , c } < + 0 0 ; and A^iX is the dual of A^x with t h e weak*-topology. Comparing with t h e result in Theorem 3.7, we have t h e following relations:
1. foe C A^x
C L2{C,ti) C A^x
C C
2. £ ( £ « , ) = £«, C yloo,A = S^Ax,,*) C U p >! F A ( £ p ) = S ( A ^ A ) C . 4 ( £ c )
= 5(C), where A(EC)
is t h e space of all analytic functions on Ec.
139 P r o p o s i t i o n 3.9. (i) SF = 0 iff F = 0 for F G ££,. Equivalently, a total subset of £x. (it) foo is a dense subspace of
the class {e(rj) : 77 G E} is
S^.
Proof. T h e first assertion (i) follows from Theorem 3.7. For the second assertion (ii), let F G ££,. By Theorem 3.7, there exists p > 1 so t h a t nmi-p(F) is finite for each m G N. Let Fk{z)=
^ ~. f DnSF{0)(Pk{z)+iPk{y))nfjL{dy), n=0 nl Jc
z G EPiC,
(3.9)
for any k G N. Then F^s are all in SQQ . Take an arbitrary tp G £00 • Then V G £m{E~p-T) for some m G N; and by Theorem 3.1, ||v||m,p < + ° ° , where r and m are defined as in (3.3). Then, by Theorem 3.7 and using t h e CauchySchwarz inequality,
\((Fk - F, ^))oo| - \((Fh - F, p»| < |M|™,P • n s ,_ p (F fc - F) -> 0. T h u s , ,Ffc —> _F in f^, as fc —> 00. It implies t h a t £<*, is dense in f^. 4
•
T h e C l a r k f o r m u l a for g e n e r a l i z e d W i e n e r f u n c t i o n a l s
Let B = {B(t) : t G [0,1]} b e the standard Brownian motion on (C, B(C), (J.), where B(t; x) = x(t) for x G C and £ G [0,1]; and let Tu t G [0,1], t h e er-field generated by B(u), Q < u < t. In [3], Lee and Huang show t h a t the conditional expectation E[<^| J-t\ for tp £ £0 and t G [0,1] admits an integral representation
n
J v(Pt{z) + Qt{y))n{dy),
zeCc,
(4.1)
where Pt(z)(s) = z(t A s), s G [0,1]; and Qt{z) — z — Pt{z). From such a representation, one see t h a t E J ^ I ^ ] G £0 and t h a t t h e mapping T : ip -) E[y>|JT t ] is continuous on £0. Since T extends to a self-adjoint operator on L 2 [C,/i]. It is n a t u r a l to define t h e conditional expectation for a generalized function F in £Q relative t o Tt, t G [0,1], by
«E[F|^t], ^ ) ) o : = «F,
nv\rt]))0.
Consequently, E [ F | . F t ] is in £ Q ( C £^)- In this section, we shall prove t h e Clark formula for generalized functions F G £g .
140 Note t h a t even for r\ £ Ec, Pt{r)) lies in C* b u t not necessarily lies in Ec. Therefore, in this section, we restrict our consideration only to the generalized Wiener functionals in £0*ForFG£0*
(=nm€Nf^(C)),let
| | F | | m = sup{|((F, ip))0\ :
< if
|z + i y | o c e 2 m " | z + i y U M ( d y ) | |fj(s)|ds
(by Fact 2.1)
< J f e(2mn+1)dzl~+l3'l~)M(dy)| r
|fj(«)|da.
It implies t h a t UPu(v))-
+ l[c)<
c
- ,
+ 1
/
Ws)lds>
(4-2)
,, is defined as in Theorem 3.1 (1); and thus
\SF(Pu(r,))-SF(Pt(r,))\ < c^^WFW-^-!
£
\ij(s)\dS
for 0 < t < u < 1. From (4.3) it follows t h a t t H-> SF(Pt(r})) continuous.
(4.3)
is absolutely •
R e m a r k 4 . 2 . Along the line of the proof of Proposition 4.1 with J0 \rj(s)\ds being replaced by JQ |d?7(s)|, it is easy t o see t h a t Proposition 4.2 remains valid.
141 For any 77 £ Ec, Proposition 4.2 implies t h a t (d/dt) SF(Pt(r])) exists almost everywhere in (0,1) and (d/dt) SF(Pt(r])) is Lebesgue integrable so that
SF(Pb(r1))-SF(Pa(r1))
= J
j t SF(P^))
dt,
0 < a < b < 1.
In particular,
SF(V) = ((F, 1)U + 1
Jt SF(Pt(r,)) dt.
(4.4)
For any t G [0,1], let Tp(t, •) b e a complex-valued mapping on Ec given by TF(t,r,)=
jtSF(Pt(V)):
V£EC.
P r o p o s i t i o n 4 . 3 . For F e £ 0 * and t G [0,1], Tp(t, •) is analytic
on
Ec.
Proof. First of all, we observe t h a t for a sufficiently small e > 0, it follows from (4.3) t h a t SF(Pt+£(r,))-SF(Pt(r,))
^•||F||_2m <
C
„ • 11*11-
ft+e . • /
\H(s)\ds W«)l' (4.5)
2m - 1 • \V\
Let 77, 0 be arbitrarily given in Ec. By (4.5) and the dominated convergence theorem, we obtain t h a t
f TF(t,r] + X
l i m e " 1 f (SF(Pt+e(r1
=
l i m e " 1 [ {S(E[F\Ft+t]){r1
+ \cf>))-SF(Pt(rl
+
+ \4>)-S{E[F\Ft}){r1
\(f>)))d\ + \(t>))d\=
0
because of the analyticity of SG for G G ££3 on Ec, where T is a simple closed curve on the complex number plane. By the Morera theorem (see 2 1 ) , C 3 A t-t Tp(t, 77 + A(p) is entire on C Letting e —>• 0 on each side of (4.5), we see t h a t \Tp(t, v)\ < c2
IFII.^,!.^*)! |/J,||_2m,-1-
< c*„„+l • WW
/ I JO •M2
Vi3)(s)ds (4.6)
142 by Proposition 2.3. Then TF(t, •) is locally bounded on Ec. Therefore, TF(t, •) is analytic on Ec. • Applying Theorem 3.7 to Proposition 4.3, there exists a unique generalized function Kp{t) in £ ^ such t h a t SKp(t)(r)) = Tp(t, rj) for each r) G Ec. By using (4.6), we follow the argument in the proof of Theorem 3.7 to see t h a t for any m > 0, nm^q(KF{t))<
C{m,q,F)<
+00,
(4.7)
provided t h a t q is large enough so t h a t e 2 ^ ^ . j A • < + 0 0 , where C(m, q, F) is a constant, independent of t h e choice of t, given by g(e2£A72<*-2>y,
C(m,q,F)=Mlc>
n=0 V
where Mm = mC:irn^
j=l
/
| | F | | _ 2 m _ i and c = s u p { n n + < 1 / 2 ) / ( e " n!) : n 6 N } .
D e f i n i t i o n 4 . 4 . Let G be a E^-valued tegral JQ G(t) dt as
function
lim n E(ti-*i-i)G(t;)
on [0,1]. We define the in-
in£i,
provided that the limit exists, where A = {0 = t0 < ti < • • • < i n = 1} is any partition of [0,1], ||A|| is
KF(t)dt, ^
= j ((KP(t), *>))„&.
It now follows from (4.4) t h a t we obtain SF{r,) = ({F, 1 ) ) ^ + S ( j
KF{t)dt\
(r,)
for F G £0* and r\ G Ec.
By Proposition 3.6, we obtain t h e Clark formula for a generalized function F G £0* below.
143
Theorem 4.5. Let F be in £$. Then there exists a unique KF(t) that S(KF(t))(v)=
£ £^ so
~S(E[F\Tt))(V)
for any t 6 [0,1] and r\ 6 Ec. Moreover, the integral JQ Kp{t) dt exists in £^ and F = ((F, 1)U + f Jo
KF{t) dt.
Corollary 4.6. For ip E £\, ip(x) = E[y>] + / E[Dip(x) l[t,i] \Ft] dB(t; x) [i-almost all x on C, Jo where the integral is the Wiener-Ito stochastic integral. Proof. First, we note that Dip(-) l[t]1] £ £i for t e [0,1]. Then the conditional expectation E[Dip(-) l[t,i] \?t\ lies in L2(C,n). By the Kubo-Takenaka formula (see [17]),
s(J
E[£W-)i[til]|:F,]dB(t)V)
(veEc)
=
f ((E[JD¥p(-)l[M]|^],^(r?)(-)l[t,1]))oo^. Jo By a direct computation, the equality (4.8) becomes f r,(t)S(E[D
f Jo
(4.8)
v(t)S{Dv(-)l[tA])(Pt(r,))dt
Applying Theorem 4.5 we see that / E[D
=
f KF(t)dt= Jo
• Remark 4.7. (a) For any F € £0*, the £^-valued function [0,1] 3 t ->• KF(t). Clark kernel function on [0,1] associated with F .
is called the
144 ( b ) T h e formula in Corollary 4.6 can be extended to all t h e generalized functions in £Q. Since t h e arguments are more involved, we shall prove this result in our forthcoming paper [18]. References 1. J. M. C. Clark: T h e representation of functionals of Brownian motion by stochastic integrals, Ann. Math. Stat. 41 (1970), 1281-1295; 42 (1971), 1778 2. M. de Faria, M. J. Oliveira, and L. Streit: A generalized Clark-Ocone formula, Preprint, 1999. 3. H.-C. Huang and Y.-J. Lee: Conditional expectation of generalized Wiener functionals, 2001, Preprint 4. G. Kothe: Topological Vector Space I, Springer-Verlag, New York/ Heidelberg/ Berlin, 1966 5. I. Karatzas, D. Ocone, and J. Li: An extension of Clark's formula, Stochastics and Stochastics Reports 37 (1991), 127-131 6. H. Korezlioglu and A. S. Ustiinel: New class of distributions on Wiener spaces, Lecture Notes in Math. Vol. 1444, Springer-Verlag, 1990 7. H.-H. Kuo: Gaussian Measures in Banach Spaces, Lectures Notes in M a t h . Vol. 463, 1975 8. H.-H. Kuo: White Noise Distribution Theory, CRC Press, 1996 9. Y.-J. Lee: Application of Fourier-Wiener transform to differential equations on infinite dimensional spaces I, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 262 (1980), 218-236 10. Y.-J. Lee: Sharp inequalities and regularity of heat semigroup on infinite dimensional space, J. Fund. Anal. 71 (1987), 69-87 11. Y.-J. Lee: Generalized functions on infinite dimensional spaces and its application to white noise calculus, J. Fund. Anal. 82 (1989), 429-464 12. Y.-J. Lee: On the convergence of Wiener-Ito decomposition, Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica 17 (1989), 305-312 13. Y.-J. Lee: Analytic version of test functionals, Fourier transform and a characterization of measures in white noise calculus, J. Fund. Anal. 100 (1991), 359-380 14. Y.-J. Lee: Positive generalized functions on infinite dimensional spaces, In "Stochastic Process, a Festschrift in Honour of Gopinath Kallianpur", Springer-Verlag, 1993, 225-234 15. Y.-J. Lee: Convergence of Fock expansion and transformations of Brownian functionals, in "Functional Analysis and Global Analysis", Edited by T. Sunada and P.-W. Sy, Springer-Verlag, 1997, 142-156
145 16. Y.-J. Lee: Integral representation of second quantization and its application to white noise analysis, J. Funct. Anal. 133 (1995), 253-276 17. Y.-J. Lee: Generalized white noise functionals on classical Wiener space, J. Korean Math. Soc. 35 No.3 (1998), 613-635 18. Y.-J. Lee and H.-H. Shih: Generalized Clark formula on the classical Wiener space, 2001, in preparation 19. P. A. Meyer and J.-A. Yan: Les "fonctions caracteeristiques" des distributionc sur l'espace de Wiener, Sem. P r o b a b . XXV, Lecture Notes in Math. 1485 (1991), 61-78 20. D. Ocone: Malliavin's calculus and stochastic integral representations of functionals of diffusion process, Stochastics. 12 (1984), 161-185 21. W. Rudin: "Real and Complex Analysis", 3d ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1987 22. A. S. Ustunel: Representations of distributions on Wiener space and stochastic calculus of variations, J. Funct. Anal. 70 (1987), 126-139 23. S. W a t a n a b e : Lectures on Stochastic Differential Equations and Malliavin Calculus, T a t a Inst, of Fundamental Research, Bombay, 1984
This page is intentionally left blank
Quantum Information IV (pp. 147-176) Eds. T. Hida and K. Saito © 2002 World Scientific Publishing Co.
INVERSE S-TRANSFORM, WICK PRODUCT A N D OVERCOMPLETENESS OF E X P O N E N T I A L V E C T O R S NOBUAKI OBATA Graduate
School of Information Sciences Tohoku University Sendai 980-8579 Japan E-mail: [email protected]
By means of distribution theory over a complex Gaussian space we formulate a coherent state representation of a white noise function and a diagonal coherent state representation of a white noise operator. An inversion formula for the S-transform (the Segal—Bargmann transform) is written down in terms of coherent state representation. As a kernel distribution the S-transform is characterized by a diagonal coherent state representation of a Wick multiplication operator. The null kernel of the coherent state representation is described in terms of holomorphic distributions and the overcompleteness of the exponential vectors is explained clearly.
Introduction We start with the real Gelfand triple: E = S(R) CH = L 2 (R) c E* = <S'(R). The canonical bilinear form on E* x E, which is compatible to the inner product of H, is denoted by (•, •) and the norm of if by | • | 0 . The Gaussian measure on E* with variance a2, denoted by /J.^, is uniquely determined by the characteristic function:
e x p { - y \t\20} = J
e**^ ».,(dx),
^ £ .
The real Gaussian space is by definition the space E* equipped with // = Hi and the complex Gaussian space is Ec = E* + iE* equipped with v{dz) = Hi/2{dx)n1/2(dy),
z = x + iy.
(1)
Both are probability spaces. In Gaussian functional analysis an important role is played by an exponential vector (or also called a coherent vector) defined by 0{(a!) = e<"'«-«'«>/ J ,
£E£C,
xeE*,
(2)
where (-, •) is the C-bilinear form on Ec x Ec- It is known that {>£ ; £ G Ec} is linearly independent and spans a dense subspace of L2[E*, [i). If £ G Ec in
148
(2) is replaced with z S E^, t h e function
p{z)<j>z u{dz)
(3)
JE-C
called a coherent state representation. In fact, it is more n a t u r a l and import a n t to consider operators rather t h a n functions for functions constitute a particular class of operators. W i t h each z 6 E]~. we associate an operator Qz defined by the formula:
Apart from normalization Qz is an analogue of one-dimensional projection on L 2 ( £ ' * , / i ) , but a precise meaning as a white noise operator is given only through distribution theory. It is then n a t u r a l to consider an operator version of (3), t h a t is, 3=
f
p{z)Qzu{dz)
(4)
JE-C
called a diagonal coherent state representation. This idea traces back to Klauder 1 2 in t h e case of finite dimension and has been extensively studied 1 ' 1 3 . Rigorous definitions of (3) and (4) based on the so-called white noise distribution t h e o r y 1 6 , 1 8 was first given by O b a t a 2 0 ' 2 1 . To b e more precise, we need a white noise triple: Wcr(t2(R))SI2(E*,/j) C W ,
(5)
where W and W* are, respectively, t h e spaces of test white noise functions and of white noise distributions on the real Gaussian space (E*,(J,). In this paper we adopt the CKS-space 6 . Then, in view of (5) and L2{E^.,u) = L2(E*,ni/2) ® L2[E*,/ii 12), which follows from (1), a CKS-space over the complex Gaussian space is constructed: VcL2(E*c,v)cV*. It will be shown t h a t exressions (3) and (4) are justified for any p 6 T>* and represent $ G W* and S £ £(W,VV*), respectively (Lemmas 3.4 and 4.2). Notice t h a t representation (3) is not unique due to the famous overcompleteness of exponential vectors; for example, for £ G Ec we have
e(*<*)
f
e<* l { > + < Z l £ >- < { l € > 0«i/(dz).
(6)
149 One of t h e main purposes of this paper is to clarify this phenomenon. A key role is played by t h e S-transform 1 4 which is a white noise extension of t h e famous Segal-Bargmann transform 8 . Let L2(EQ, I^)HOL denote t h e space of holomorphic L 2 -functions on t h e complex Gaussian space (EQ,V). T h e Segal-Bargmann transform is a unit a r y isomorphism from L2(E*,fi) onto L2(EQ,I/)HOL uniquely defined by t h e correspondence: ^ ( z ) = e<*'«>"«•«> /2
*»
e £ (z) = e
£6
Ec.
On t h e other hand, t h e S-transform is defined for $ 6 W* by
S$(0 = « $ , ^ » ,
£e£c.
2
If $ 6 L (E*,n), t h e S-transform S $ is extended to a holomorphic L2function on (EQ, V) a n d coincides with t h e Segal-Bargmann transform. Moreover, for $ 6 W* t h e S-transform 5 $ is viewed as a holomorphic distribution on EQ and one comes to t h e following T h e o r e m 3 . 3 The S-transform extends the Segal-Bargmann is a topological isomorphism from VV* onto 2?JJOL •
transform
and
T h e inverse S-transform is given by the coherent s t a t e representation. T h e o r e m 3.5 For any $ E W*, the S-transform 5 $ being regarded as a holomorphic distribution on the complex Gaussian space, it holds that
$ = f In particular, sentation.
S${z)4>zu{dz).
every white noise distribution
(7)
$ admits a coherent state
repre-
However, since a coherent state representation is not unique due to t h e overcompleteness of exponential vectors, there arises a question of characterization of t h e S-transform as a kernel in (7). To answer this question, we focus on uniqueness of t h e diagonal coherent state representation for white noise operators, t h a t is, T h e o r e m 4 . 3 Every white noise operator 3 S C(W,W*) admits diagonal coherent state representation as in (4) with p £ V*.
a unique
Applying this to a Wick multiplication operator, we come to t h e following T h e o r e m 5.2 Let W
W*= I JE'C
operator by $ 6 W*.
S
Then
(8)
150 T h u s t h e S-transform 5 $ is characterized as a unique kernel distribution of W$. T h e inverse S-transform is again obtained from (8) by using simple relations W^4>o = 3> and Qz
c<*- c >Q I i/(dz) I
= f JE'C
while the second identity: e<*'« + <*-«>-<«'«Q z i/(dz)
0C = f
gives the diagonal coherent state representation of the pointwise multiplication operator by >£. Finally, we investigate the null kernel of coherent state representations. Let D A H b e the space of all anti-holomorphic test functions and T>AH denote the space of all p £ V* which annihilate X>AH> t h a t is, all p £ V* such t h a t ((p, <j>f)u = 0 for all
Then p £ T>* is a kernel of its coherent
$ = /
p(z)(j)z
state
u(dz)
JE-C
if and only if P = Pi + P2,
with pi(z)
Pi £ T>*AR,
P2 G £>AH>
— S$(z).
We have thus seen t h a t complex white noise theory established in this paper sheds some light on questions concerning the over completeness of exponential vectors. In particular, it seems worthwhile to note t h a t the S-transform is characterized in terms of coherent state representation. Complex white noise dates back to the early stages of white noise theory and has been studied from different aspects. Among others, a white noise approach to the Segal-Bargmann transform, discussed by Kubo-Yokoi 1 5 and Yokoi 2 8 , has a close relation to the present work. While, a new direction of characterization theorems is proposed by J i - O b a t a 1 0 where we enjoy an interesting encounter with theory of infinite holomorphy ' .
151
1 1.1
White Noise Functions Weighted Fock space
Let % be a (real or complex) Hilbert space. For n > 1 the n-fold symmetric tensor power of H is denoted by Ji0n and by definition H®0 is one dimensional. Given a sequence a = {a(n)}^_ 0 of positive numbers we put
ra(H) = U = (/„)£=„; / » e W S B . IHI2 = E n ! a W I / - l 2 < °°} • In an obvious manner r a ("H) becomes a Hilbert space and is called the weighted Fock space over ti. The Boson Fock space is by definition the special case of a{n) = 1 and is denoted by T(H). We need some general notion for positive sequences. A positive sequence a = {a(n)}£?_0 is called log-concave if a(n)a(n + 2) < a(n + l)2,
n = 0,1, 2 , . . . .
Two positive sequences a = {a(n)}^L0 and (3 — {/3(n)}£L0 are called equivalent if there exist positive constants K\,K2,M\, Mi > 0 such that KiMfain)
< f3(n) < K2M?a(n),
n = 0,1,2,....
From now on we fix a weight sequence a = {a(n)}^=0 conditions:
satisfying the following
(Al) a(0) = 1 and inf crna(n) > 0 for some cr > 1; n>0 1/n
(A2) l i m { ^ }
" = 0;
n-l-oo [ n ! J
(A3) a is equivalent to a positive sequence 7 = {l(n)} such that J7(n)/n!} is log-concave; (A4) a is equivalent to another positive sequence 7 = {7(n)} such that {(n!7(n))"" 1 } is log-concave. For example, (n!)^ with 0 < (3 < 1 and the Bell numbers of order A; satisfy the above conditions. The exponential generating functions of a and 1/a are defined by Ga{t) = £ ^ t " , n*—' =0
n!
{t)
G
'
= £ -Jp^t-, *—' n i Q l n l
152 respectively. Both are entire holomorphic functions by ( A l ) and (A2). We next define
S l ,„ ( ( ) = £^{ a 5^}. n=0
*•
-*
It is known 2 t h a t (A3) and (A4) are necessary and sufficient conditions respectively for Ga and for G i / a to have positive radiai of convergence. These functions will play a crucial role in norm estimates. Moreover, the next fact is known 2 . L e m m a 1.1 Let a = {a(n)} (1) There exists a constant a(n)a(m)
be as above. C\ > 0 such that
< C"+ma(n
(2) There exists a constant
+ m),
=
0,1,2,....
n,m
=
0,1,2,....
C2 > 0 such that
a(n + m) < C™+ma{n)a(m), (3) There exists a constant
n,m
C3 > 0 such that a(n) < C ™ a ( m ) ,
n < m.
Then, by a simple calculation we have P r o p o s i t i o n 1.2 Let a — { a ( n ) } be as above and Ga(t) generating function. Then, for s, t > 0 we have: (1) Ga(0)
= 1 and Ga(s)
< Ga(t)
for
the
exponential
s
(2) G Q ( S ) G Q ( i ) < G Q ( C 1 ( S + *)). (3) Ga{s + (4) e°Ga(t)
t)
and M _ 1 = inf n >o
crna(n).
153 1.2
CKS-Space
As usual, we start with the real Gelfand triple: E = S{R)
CH = L2{K)C
E*=S'(R),
(9)
where the canonical bilinear form on E* X E is denoted by (•, •) and t h e norm of L2(R) by | • | 0 . For p > 0 let E±p b e the Hilbert space obtained by completing E = «S(R) with respect to the norm |£|± p = |"A ±p £|o) where A = 1 + t2 - d2/dt2. We then have E S proj lim Ep,
E* S ind lim £ _ p .
p->oo
p->oo
In general, for a real vector space X the complexification is denoted by XcFor notational convenience, t h e C-bilinear extension on f?£. x Ec is denoted by t h e same symbol. It is then noted t h a t |£|Q = (£, £} for £ G HeLet r a ( £ ' p ) b e t h e weighted Fock space over Ep. Then W = ra(£)=projlimrQ(£;p) p—>oo
becomes a nuclear Frechet space and we obtain a Gelfand triple: W = Ta{E)cT{Hc) cTa{E)* = W*,
(10)
which is called the Cochran-Kuo-Sengupta space6 or t h e CKS-space T h e topology of W is defined by the family of norms:
for short.
oo
71=0
As a consequence of s t a n d a r d argument, ra(i5),^indlimrQ-i(£_p), p—K30
where r a (i*7)* carries the strong dual topology and = stands for a topological linear isomorphism. T h e canonical C-bilinear form on W* x W is denoted by «-, •))• T h e n OO
p , >)) = Y, m (Fn, /„>,
* = {Fa)eW,
n=0
and it holds t h a t
|(($,0))|<||$||_ p ,_IHI P , + ,
4>=(fn)eW,
154 where OO
j
V
n=0
>
Conditions (A1)-(A4) are sorted out by A s a i - K u b o - K u o 2 from many similar ones t h a t have been introduced to keep "nice" properties of a CKSspace. On the other hand, it is also possible to start with a generating function Ga or another function controlling growth rate. This reversed approach is concise and useful for some questions 2 , 7 , 1 1 , however, we prefer to the explicit description for our later calculation. 1.3
Wiener-Ito-Segal
Isomorphism
and Exponential
Vectors
Let fj.^2 be the Gaussian measure with variance a2 defined by t h e characteristic function: 2
e-
\Z\Z/2=
f c <(«.C) / i ( r l ( d a .) > J E*
£
£ E
.
(11)
We p u t fi = [j,! for simplicity and let L2(E*,fi) denote the Hilbert space of C-valued L 2 -functions on E*. T h e celebrated Wiener-Ito-Segal isomorphism is a unitary isomorphism between L2(E*,fj.) and T(Hc) uniquely determined by the correspondence
u>
V'-'^r--)'
UEc
-
T h e same symbol
P r o p o s i t i o n 1.3 { ^ ; £ G Ec}
spans a dense subspace ofW
T h e proof is well known. 2 2.1
Complex White Noise Complex
Gaussian
Space
We define a probability measure v on EQ = E* + iE* by v(dz) = H\/2{dx)n1/2{dy),
z = x + iy e E*c,
=
(12) exponential
Ta(Ec)-
155 where ^i/2 is the Gaussian measure on E* with variance a2 = 1/2, see (11). After Hida 9 the probability space (EQ , v) is called the complex Gaussian space. We write z = x — iy for z = x + iy £ E* + iE*. Here are basic formulae: e{~z'V+{z<")v(dz)
= e{t'r>),
Z,V£EC,
J E:
(13)
{z®m, 6 ® • • • ® U)(z®n, m ® • • • ® »j«> K ^ )
/ J B:
= < J m „ m ! ( £ i ® . . . ® f m , »7i®...®»j m ), -2.-2
CKS-Space
over Complex
Gaussian
£i,r)jeEc-
(14)
Space
By modifying the Wiener-Ito-Segal isomorphism (12) we have a unitary isomorphism: L2(E',vi1/2)°
(15)
uniquely specified by the correspondence: Ve(z)=e^<*'«>-<^>/2
(
£®2
£®n
\
Identifying functions on £ £ and on .E* x E* in a canonical manner: 0 ® ^ ( a 5 + itf) = 0 ( x ) ^ ( y ) ,
x,y£E*,
4>,V> € L 2 (£*,M1/2),
(16)
we have an isomorphism: L2(£^)-L2(iT,Ml/2)®L2(£;%/i1/2).
(17)
Then, combining (15) and (17) we obtain a unitary isomorphism l:T{Hc)®T{Hc)->L2{E*c,v).
(18)
Moreover, applying this I to the Gelfand triple (10), we come to a Gelfand
triple: VcL2{E*c,v)cV*,
(19)
which is referred to as t h e CKS-space over the complex Gaussian space. By construction, I becomes topological isomorphisms (denoted by the same symbol) from W ®W onto V and (W ®W)* onto V*. T h e canonical C-bilinear
156 form on T>* x T> is denoted by ((-, •)),, and the norms induced by Ta(Ep) denoted by || • H^ , ± for p > 0, i.e.,
|| 1 ( 0 ® V) | | „ i ± P i ± = II ^ ll ± p ,± IIV l l ± P l ± ,
are
0, V e w .
For £ £ S c we define
By a simple calculation we come to the following L e m m a 2.1 77ie isomorphism X is uniquely determined
by 2
2(0? ® 0„)(z) = ^ . ^ / ^ J ^ + ^ / ^ ^ e - ^ ' ^ / - ^ " ) / 2 , where f, 77 r u n over i?c 5.5
Holomorphic
I?
-Functions
By means of t h e orthogonal relation (14) one easily obtains t h e following L e m m a 2.2 For any 0 = (fm) € T(HC) OO
^( Z ) = Y, <*8ra. /•»>.
^ 4
m=0
is defined in the sense of L2(Ec,v) and <j> i-> w^ is an isometric T(HC) into L2{E*c,v). We define a closed subspace of L2(EQ,U) by
map
from
L2(££,z/)HOL = -K;0er(tfc)}. Then, in view of the W i e n e r - I t 6-Segal isomorphism L2(E*,^j.) obtain a unitary isomorphism L2{E\n)
= T(Hc)
we
L2{E*c,v)n0L-
=
This is the famous Segal-Bargmann transform 8 . L e m m a 2.3 Under the identification L2(EQ,V) = T(Hc) I we have the following correspondence:
\
W
/ 0
®T(Hc)
given by
( iC \<8>(m-k)
(j)
)®(o,...,m
-,
••°'-)'
,0,...),
157 where ( G Ec • PROOF.
It follows from L e m m a 2.1 t h a t l{4>i®
where =
P 4- i n
Z + iy V2 '
S
, = £P -— ir)in V2 '
T h e n the assertion follows by Taylor expansion. L e m m a 2.4 For £ G Ec Then, for p >0 we have
I
and m = 0 , 1 , 2 , . . . we pw£ w m ,f(z) = (z, C) •
•x\\l,P,+
=rn<\C®-\l±±(f)a(k)a(rn-k)
(20)
fc=0 PROOF.
For
simplicity we
put
fc
MC) = (o,...,C® ,o,...),
CeEc,
fc>o.
Obviously, hfc(C) G W and
ll^(C)||p I+ =fe!a(fc)Kl". It follows from L e m m a 2.3 t h a t
rl w=
' S&)' i '(^) 8 ' , ^( ;<M'
Since the right h a n d side is an orthogonal sum with respect to the n o r m i i P , + > we have
hk [ j ^ j ® /.—*, ( ^
°m,C ll„.)Pi +
p,+
fc=o m
/
2
\ '
^"•m. — k. \
fe=o v
7
( - y/2")
= E r; ««(*)0 fc=o
fc=0 ^
as desired.
P,+
i—
V2
p,+ 2(m-fc)
2fc
(m — k)\a(rn — k) A/2
'
p
v/2
158 P r o p o s i t i o n 2 . 5 For <j> = ( / m ) G W let w^ £ L2(E(,,v) Lemma 2.2. Then for any p > 0,
be defined as in
i «• C , + = E ™! i /»e ^ E I r ( f e ) a ( m -fc)m=0 PROOF.
For fm
fc=0
G Eg"
1
^
we p u t wm(z)
(21)
' = (z®m,
fm).
T h e n , by t h e
polarization formula a n d Fourier expansion we see from L e m m a 2.4 t h a t
II wra \\lipi+ =ml\fm\l—Y^[?)a(k)a{m-k),
p>0.
Since u>^ = ^ m = o w"» *s a n orthogonal sum, (21) follows immediately.
2-4
Holomorphic
Test
|
Functions
We define
VnoL=VnL2(Ec,u)EOLLet <j) i-> o;,^ b e t h e unitary m a p from r(.ffc) onto L 2 ( . E C , I > ) H O L defined in L e m m a 2.2. P r o p o s i t i o n 2 . 6 TVie map
from
onto X>HOL-
P R O O F . Let 0 = (fm) G W a n d s t a r t with (21). Since a(k)a(m C™a(m) by L e m m a 1.1 (1), we have
IIu* t,p,+ = E
m!
- k) <
I /»lp ^ E ( 7 ) Q ( fc ) a ( m - fc)
m—0
fc—0
^
'
00
(22)
m=0
Choose q > 0 in such a way t h a t C\p2q Then, (22) becomes
< 1, where p = ||^4 _ 1 ||op = 1/2.
00
II <** \\ltPi+ < E m=0
ml
C^(m)p2n
fm \2p+q < II cf> 15+,,+ , ^ G W. (23)
159
A similar argument using Lemma 1.1 (2) yields
||0|| p , + <||^IL, p+7 ., + ,
0£W,
(24)
where r > 0 is chosen in such a way that C^p2* < 1. The assertion is a consequence of two norm estimates (23) and (24). I
3 3.1
Representation of White Noise Functions S-transform and Characterization
Theorem
The S-transform of $ £ W* is denned by
5#(0 = «*, >«)),
ZeEc.
It follows from Proposition 1.3 that the S-transform determines a white noise function uniquely. In fact, for $ = (Fn) we have oo
S
*(t) = £
^G£c
(25)
n=0
Moreover, we have the following fundamental result known as the characterization theorem for S-transform 6,25 . Theorem 3.1 A C-valued function F defined on Ec is the S-transform of a white noise distribution $ £ W* if and only if (Fl) for any £,£i £ Ec, z H-> F(Z£ + £i) is entire holomorphic on C; (F2) £/iere exist some C > 0 anii p > 0 such that \F(t)\2
t€Ec.
In that case,
\\*\\2-{p+q),-
160 3.2
Holomorphic
Distributions
For <j) E W t h e S-transform S
50(z) = ((0„0)),
z e 4
where ®2
(
0n
\
and is also referred t o as t h e exponential vector. Then, for
n=0
by L e m m a 2.2. In other words, t h e S-transform, which is defined for all $ £ W* and S$ is an entire function on Ec, and t h e Segal-Bargmann transform, which is defined for all
W*(z)
= Y, <*®n. Fn),
* = (^») € W*,
(26)
n=0
is given a meaning as an element of V*. (Recall t h a t (26) converges if $ e W or if $ S T(Hc)-) By a similar argument as in t h e proof of Proposition 2.5 we come to P r o p o s i t i o n 3.2 For ({> = (fm) G W /e£ w^ be defined as in (26). Then for any p > 0, °°
II " • Hi-p,- = £
1
!
™ I / » I-P ^
m
£
/
\
1
( T j Q (fc)a(m-fc)-
V
v
(27)
v
m=0 fc=0 ' ' ' Then, obviously t h e m a p I / I I - > ^ extends an isomorphism from W* into 2?* a n d we adopt a formal notation for uo
* e w*}.
T h e n we have already seen t h a t <$ H-> ai # is a topological isomorphism from >V* onto X'HOL- In t h e sense t h a t t h e m a p $ i-> w$ is an extension of t h e S-transform S<& we may state T h e o r e m 3 . 3 The S-transform extends the Segal-Bargmann is a topological isomorphism from W* onto PjjoL •
transform
and
161 A holomorphic distribution 12 e T>^OL feels only anti-holomorphic test functions. Define t h e space of anti-holomorphic L 2 -functions by L 2 ( B £ , ^ ) A H = {(/> e L2(E*c,v);
L2(E*C,V)UOL}
0 €
and t h e space of anti-holomorphic test functions by £>AH=2>nL2(££,i/)AHT h e n for fi £ 2?HOL
anc
^
w
£ £>AH
w e
have oo
«fi, "))„ = $ > ! < F „ , / „ ) ,
(28)
where
5.5
Coherent
oo
oo
71=0
71=0
State Representation
and Inverse
S-transform
By definition, for £ G .Ec we have e € (z) = e<2'«> = ipi/y/2{x)ipii/Vz(y),
z = x + iy G £ £ .
In other words, J
( ^ / V 5 ® ^ / v ^ ) = e«
(29)
and, in particular, e^ £ 23. L e m m a 3 . 4 For any p 6 T>* there exists a unique $ g W* suc/i £/ia£ 5$(e) = ((P)Ce»l/,
f £ E c
(30)
P R O O F . Denote by F ( £ ) t h e right h a n d side of (30). It is obvious t h a t F satisfies condition ( F l ) in Theorem 3.1. We shall prove (F2). Choose p > 0 such t h a t || p H^ _ < oo. Then in view of (29) we see t h a t
WOI2 < IMI',-
\P\\u-V,-
KP, l^/v^llp,+ ll^i«/^llp,+ it £ Ga V2 V2
In view of Proposition 1.2 (2) we have G„
€ V^
GQ
tf v/2
< G « ( C l | £ l p ) < G « ( C V « | £ lp+g)
(31)
162 where p = | | A _ 1 | | 0 p = 1/2. come to
Choose q > 0 such t h a t Cxp2* < 1. Then we
\F(t)\2 <\\p\\l,-P,-Ga(tt\l+g), and condition (F2) is fulfilled. Thus, by T h o e r e m 3.1, F is the S-transform of a white noise distribution in VV*. I T h e white noise distribution $ defined as in (30) is denoted by $ = /
p(z)<j>zv{dz)
JE-C
and is called a coherent state
representation.
T h e o r e m 3.5 For any $ £ VV*, the S-transform S$ being regarded as a holomorphic distribution on the complex Gaussian space, it holds that $ = / JE'C In particular, sentation. PROOF.
S$(z)<j>zv{dz).
every white noise distribution
$ admits a coherent state
repre-
It follows from Theorem 3.3 t h a t OO
p(z) = S*(z) = 5 > ® » , F„) 71 = 0
belongs t o V* a n d by L e m m a 3.4 t h e r e exists a unique \P G VV* satisfying S * ( f ) = {(p, e^)),, for f G Ec. Note t h a t
n=0
X
' '
Hence by (28),
n=0
which coincides with S$(£).
*
' '
n=0
Therefore $ = $ .
| 3
A relavant formula was obtained by Berezansky-Kondratiev by means of duality argument over complex Gaussian space in a different realization. T h e inverse S-transform was also discussed within the real Gaussian integral 1 5 , 1 7 .
163
4 4-1
Representation of White Noise Operators White Noise Operators,
Symbols and
Kernels
A continuous operator from W into W* is in general referred t o as a white noise operator. Let £ ( W , W*) denote t h e space of white noise operators. T h e
symbol of 5 £ C(W,W*) is by definition a C-valued function on Ec x Ec defined by
T h e symbol uniquely specifies a white noise operator by Proposition 1.3. Moreover, by t h e kernel theorem there exists a unique s.K G (W <8> W ) * such that
H(£,r,) = «H>6 0,)) = « 5 * , 04 ® >„)),
(,ri££c.
This H ^ is called t h e kernel of S. We now state t h e characterization for operator symbols 4 ' 1 8 . T h e o r e m 4 . 1 A function © : Ec x £?c -> C « the symbol of an operator E€C(W,W*) if and only if ( 0 1 ) for any £, £i,?7,771 G - E c ( z > u ; ) '""*' ®(z£ + £i,wr] + rji) is entire morphic on C X C ; ( 0 2 ) there exist constant
holo-
numbers C > 0 and p > 0 swcft £/ia£
|©(£,r?)| 2 < C G Q ( | ^ ) G Q ( | r , | 2 ) ,
£,r, G £ C -
/ n £/ia£ case
\\m\2-(P+q)l- < CGHWA-'W^ml^,
4> G W,
(32)
where q > 1/2 is tofcen as Ga(||-<4 _ , ||]j S ) < 00. ^.2
Diagonal
Coherent
State
Representation
W i t h each z E Ec v?e associate Qz G £ ( W , VV*) by t h e formula:
Qz4> = ((4>z,4>))<j>z,
0GW.
Note here t h a t b o t h maps 2 4 ^ £ W * a n d z 4 continuous. T h e symbol of Qz is given by Qz{Z,r1) = qLri{z) = e^+^\
Q 2 £ C(W,W*)
zeEc,
(,r, € Ec.
are
(33)
164
Then, for z = x + iy we obtain q^{x
+ iy) = e ^ ^ e ^ - ^ " ' )
and hence qitV = e«- n)X(4>li+Jl)/^
® 0l(_€+„)/v/^
(34)
In particular, q^iV £ V. L e m m a 4 . 2 For p 6 V* there is a unique operator 3 G £ ( W , W*) swc/i that « S ^ , 0,)) = ((p, g £ i „»„,
Uefic-
(35)
T h e proof is similar to t h a t of L e m m a 3.4 with t h e help of Theorem 4.1. T h e operator S defined by (35) is denoted by
a= f
p{z)Qzy{dz)
(36)
JE-C
and is called t h e diagonal coherent state representation. T h e next result was proved first by O b a t a 2 0 and we give a different proof here. T h e o r e m 4 . 3 Every white noise operator S G £ ( W , W*) admits a unique diagonal coherent state representation. PROOF. specified by
Qfa
0
We shall first define an operator Q G £(W
4>n) = e -«,«/»-(^)/»0 ( { + . ) j ) M ® ^-ivy^
uniquely
f- ^ e ^ c
Since t h e exponential vectors are linearly independent, so are {>£ ®4>n', f,») G i ? c } and ^ is well defined on a subspace spaned by such tensor products of exponential vectors. It is then sufficient t o check t h a t t h e function
0 ( £ ^ ; £',*?') = {{G{
<M>
(37)
satisfies t h e conditions in t h e characterization theorem in t h e case of multivariables (see Theorem A.6). In fact, condition ( 0 1 ) is rather obvious. To see ( 0 2 ) we take an arbitrary p > 0. We see easily t h a t
Ktyc-H.,)/^' *€'»|2 ^ ll*(€-H,)/^l£,+ H^' ll-p,2 •
= 0.(|i^|JGl/.(iri".,,
165
Then by Proposition 1.2 (3) we obtain l « * K + « , ) / ^ . ^ ' » | 2 < Ga{C2 11 \2p)Ga(C2 | „ g ) G 1 / a ( | £' | % ) .
(38)
Similarly, \((^-in)/V2'
^))\2
< Ga(C2 \i\2p)Ga{C2
\l\2p)G1/a(\v'
tp).
(39)
On the other hand, it follows from Proposition 1.2 (4) that |e-<€.€>/2,2 < e |«,€>| < c t C a p ^ l e t J ) ,
(40)
where p — \\ A-1 ||op = 1/2, and similarly, \e~<™)/*\*
(41)
Combining (38)-(41), we obtain an estimate for (37) as follows: l©(^;£', V)l2 < Ga(c21 e| 2 )G Q (G 2 h|J)G 1 / Q (|e' |%)
xGa(C 2 |e|J)G a (C 2 h|^)G 1/Q (h'| 2 _ p ) x G Q (C 3 P 2 p | ££)G a (C 3 p 2 * | 7712)
(42)
By virtue of Proposition 1.2 (2) there exists some C > 0 such that Ga{C21 i | 2 )G Q (C 2 | £ | 2 )G a (C 3 p 2 " | £ | 2 ) < G a ( C | £ | 2 ) . Now choose g > 0 satisfying Cp2q < 1 to have Ga{C2 | i \2p)Ga(C2 K \2p)Ga(C3p*r \ £ | 2 ) < G a ( | £ | 2 + q ) . Together with a similar inequality for 77 we finally conclude that (42) becomes | 6 ( £ r?; £',r/)| 2 < G a ( | £ | 2 + , ) G t t ( | 77 | 2 + , ) G 1 / a ( | £' |l p )G 1 / c ,(| r/ | 2 _ p ), which shows the desired condition (02). Thus Q G C(W ® W, W ® W). Similarly, V. G £(W ® W, W ® W) is uniquely specified by H(0 ? ® 4>r,) = e^'iUu+r,)/^ Moreover,
® <J>n-i+n)/y/2>
9U{.4>t ® 0,) = H g ( 0 ? ®
trj€
EC-
£, ry G £ C -
_1
Therefore, 5 is an automorphism of W <8> W and 6 = %. Now, suppose we are given an arbitrary operator H G £(W, W*). Then « H ^ , ^ ) ) = ( ( S * , ^ ® >„))
= ((s Jf ,aw(^0^)» = ((e*sjr,«(0€®0,)» = ((0,S*,^+I,)/V5®^_€+1l)/V5»e«.''>.
166 Using (34) we see immediately t h a t
This means t h a t S admits a diagonal coherent s t a t e representation:
E= f
P{z)Qzv(dz),
P=
ig*zKev*.
JE'C
T h e uniqueness of p is obvious since IQ* is an isomorphism from ( W ® W ) * onto V. I
^.5
Examples
P r o p o s i t i o n 4 . 4 (Resolution of the identity) It holds that
1= [
Qzu{dz).
JE* For t h e proof we need only to compute the symbols of b o t h sides. T h e prototype of the above formula was given by Klauder 1 2 , see also K l a u d e r Skagerstam 1 3 for various developments. From Proposition 4.4 a unitarity criterion is derived 2 2 and is applied t o q u a n t u m stochastic differential equations involving square of white noise 2 3 . m,
W i t h each KitTn <E (Ec formal integral expression: "(,m(K(,m)
=
/
y
K
l,m\sli a
we associate a white noise operator by a
• • • > sh
*Sl---
a
^1) • • • i ^m)
a , a « i • • • atmds1
... dsidti
...dtm.
(43)
4 18
This is called an integral kernel operator. It is known ' t h a t for any m Kl,m £ (Ec )*, t h e integral kernel operator Sj i m («;i i m ) always belongs to C(yV,W*). T h e symbol is easily obtained:
Moreover, every S E £ ( W , W*) admits an infinite series expansion: oo
H
= X ] El,™(Kl,m), l,m=0
where the right hand side converges in £ ( W , W*).
(44)
167 P r o p o s i t i o n 4.5 For F e {E®m)*
we have
H0,m(F)= f
{z®m,F)Qzv(dz),
(45)
{z®m,F)Qzv{dz).
(46)
JE'C
Era,o(F)=/"
P R O O F . P u t p(z) = (z® m , F ) . As is easily verified by definition, p GT>* and a white noise operator S=
/
(z®m,F)Qzi/(dz)
is defined. Then t h e operator symbol is given by S & r , ) = «P, g Cl „» = /
( ^ m , F)
e<*'«>
+
<*'"> ^ ) -
Then using t h e orthogonal relation (14), we obtain with no difficulty m,v)
= (F, £®m>e<«'"> =
E0,m(Ff(tv),
which proves (45). By duality (46) is obtained immediately.
I
For F - 5t G E* we write naturally (z, F) = (z, 5t) = z(t). Then {z(t)} is nothing b u t the complex white noise 9 . As a special case of Proposition 4.5, we have the following P r o p o s i t i o n 4.6 ( Q u a n t u m white noise) at=
z(t)Qzv{dz),
a* = /
JE'C
5 5.1
zJi)Qzu(dz).
JE'C
W i c k P r o d u c t and Overcompleteness of Exponential Vectors Wick Product of White Noise
Functions
For $ ! , $2 £ VV* there exists a unique *& € VV* such t h a t 5*(0 = 5*1(0-5*2(e),
f6£c.
T h e verification is simple with the help of Theorem 3.1. In t h a t case we write $ = $1 0 $ 2 -
L e m m a 5.1 For $ S VV* fixed, the map W$ :
continuous
168
PROOF.
We compute the symbol. ({Wth,
<^» = « * o 4>(, 0,» = 5 ( $ o ^)(r?) = 5 * ( r , ) - 5 ^ ( r , ) = ((*,0,))e«'">.
Choosing p > 0 such that || $ ||_
(47)
< oo, we come to
<\\n2-P,-Ga{\v\l)e^+M',
(48)
where we used a simple inequality: 2| (f, 17) | < | £ | 0 + 177 | 0 < | £ L + | >7 LNow, with the help of Proposition 1.2 we see that (48) becomes l((^0|,^»|2<||$l|2-p,-Ga(2|r?|2)GQ(|£|2)
f
S${z)Qzv(dz).
(49)
JE>C PROOF.
Let $ = (F m ). Then OO
S*{Z) = J2 (*0m. M m=0
as an element of T>*, see also the proof of Theorem 3.5. Consider the diagonal coherent state representation: J E:
S${z)Qzv(dz).
It then follows from Proposition 4.5 that 00
2 = 2_^ Z'mfiiFm),
169 and therefore, oo
m=0
This coincides with (47) and hence IE = W$ as desired.
I
T h u s t h e diagonal coherent s t a t e representation of a Wick multiplication operator is directly related to the S-transform. As an immediate application, the inversion formula for the S-transform is obtained. Since WQ<J>Q — $ and Qz(f>o = 4>z, it is sufficient to apply (49) to 4>Q. 5.2
Overcompleteness
of Exponential
Vectors
Let X ^ H denote the space of all p G V* which annihilate X'AH) t h a t is, all p eV* such t h a t ((p, 0)) = 0 for all > G £>HOL = v n L2{Eh' ^ ) H O L - Recall t h a t ((•, •)) is a C-bilinear form by our convention. T h e o r e m 5.3 For pEV* put $ = /
p(z)<j>zu(dz),
- = /
JE-C
p(z)Qzv{dz). JE'C
Then the following four conditions
are
equivalent:
(ii) <* = 0; (iii) S annihilates
the vacuum;
3>o = 0;
(iv) 3 is a quantum stochastic integral against the annihilation there exists L G E^® £ ( W , W*) such that
process,
i.e.,
3 = / L(t)at dt. Jn PROOF,
(i) = >
(ii). By L e m m a 3.4,
s*(0 = «P,e«»,
£e£c.
Since e^ G X>HOLi the assertion follows immediately. (ii) = > (i). It is easily verified t h a t t (->• ((p, e^)) is entire holomorphic on C . Then from 0 = S $ ( t £ ) = {(p, eti)) for all z G C it follows t h a t ((p,
Wm»
= 0,
Um(z)
= (z®m,
em)
•
This being valid for all £ G EQ, we conclude t h a t p G 2?AH #
170 (ii) •*=>• (iii) is obvious from Qz<po =
1=0
This is equivalent to K/(O = 0 for all / > 0. Therefore S is a sum of integral kernel operators involving one or more annihilation operators. We then see t h a t such an operator is a q u a n t u m stochastic integral (in a broad sense) against the annihilation process 1 9 . I As an immediate consequence, we come to the following T h e o r e m 5.4 Let <£ 6 W*. Then p € T>* is a kernel of its coherent representation: $ = /
state
p{z)(j>z u(dz)
JE-C
if and only if P = P\+
with p\{z) =
P2,
Pi G V*AH, p2 E Z>AH,
S$(z).
Acknowledgments This work is supported in p a r t by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research No. 12440036, Ministry of Education, J a p a n . Appendix: Multi-Variable W h i t e Noise Functions In the proof of Theorem 4.3 we used a result on white noise functions of two variables. More generally, taking the n-fold tensor power of the one-variable CKS-space yVcL2(E*,fi)cW*,
E*=S'(R),
(50)
we obtain a Gelfand triple of n-variable functions: n times
W ® n C L2{E*
x . . . x Ei,'n
n times
x ••• x fl) c (W®")*.
(51)
171
In this Appendix we mention characterization theorems for (51). In fact, owing to nuclearity of W, most results concerning the one-variable CKS-space (50) admit straightforward generalization to the (finitely many) multi-variable case (51). However, for its importance in applications and lack of written literatures it seems worthwhile to give a brief account. Throughout this section we fix an integer n > 1 and consider a finite set T = { 1 , 2 , . . . , n} equipped with the counting measure. By the standard construction 18 with the help of the operator A ® 1 on L 2 (R x T) = L2(TV) ® R® n , where A = 1 + t2 - d2/dt2 as in Section 1.2, we obtain a real Gelfand triple: S{R x T) C L 2 (R x T) c S'{R x T).
(52)
Using nuclearity of iS(R), one sees easily that n times
5(Rxr)^E®R"^£ffi-®£,
E = S{R),
(53)
and hence n times n
<S'(R x T) S E* ® R
3* £ * © • • • © £ * ,
E* = S'(R).
(54)
We denote elements of 5 ( R x T) and «S'(R X T) by £ = ( & , . . . , £ n ) and x = (x\,..., x n ), respectively. Then n
(*,0 = £>*,&>• fc=l
Here it is important to note that the direct sum E © • • • © .E is obtained from a single space R x T and a single operator A® 1 = A® • • • @ A acting on L 2 (R x T) £ L 2 (R) ® R n £ L 2 (R) © • • • © L 2 (R) (n times). Let pi be the standard Gaussian measure associated with the Gelfand triple (52), i.e., determined by ei<"'c>pi(das),
e-\C\l/2=f
£eS(RxT).
(55)
JS'CRxT)
Recall that the one-variable CKS-space (50) is constructed from L2(E*,fj,) with the help of p-norms and a given weight sequence a. In the multivariable case, the p-norm is defined by the second quantized operator T(A (g> 1) and in the exactly same manner we come to the Gelfand triple: W C L2{S'(R
x T), Ji) ~ T(L 2 (R x T)) c W*.
(56)
172 On t h e other hand, by the uniqueness of the characteristic function, we see from (55) t h a t p, = fi x • • • x fj, ( n times) according t o the identification (54). Hence L 2 (<S'(R x T),JZ) =
L2(E*,»)®n.
T h e n by nuclearity of W one sees from (51) t h a t
In other words, the Gelfand triple (51) coincides exactly with the CKS-space constructed from L 2 ( R X T ) . Since structure of the underlying space R has no effect on the proofs of characterization theorems for the S-transform and for the operator symbol, the same argument can b e applied in the case where the underlying space is R x T. We only note t h a t || {A ® 1)-" HOP = || A~" | | O P ,
|| (A ® 1)~« | | | s = n\\ A~" \\2HS.
Thus, as literal translation from Theorems 3.1 and 4.1 (the case of n = 1) we obtain the following T h e o r e m A . l A function F : Sc(R x T ) - t C is the S-transform $ S (W®n)* if and only if ( F l ) z H-» F(z£+£')
is entire holomorphic
in z G C for any£,£'
of some
£ «Sc(RxT);
(F2) there exist C > 0 and p > 0 such that \F(S)\2
£eSc(RxT).
in that case,
HIIV^.-^^HI^'IIHS),
(57)
where q > 1/2 is taken in such a way that G Q ( n | | A~q H^g) < oo. T h e o r e m A . 2 A function 6 : 5 C ( R x T ) x 5 C ( R x T ) -+ C is the symbol of an operator E € £ ( W ® " , (W®n)*) if and only if ( 0 1 ) forany$,Z',Ti,T}' € 5 c ( R x T ) the function is entire holomorphic on C x C ; ( 0 2 ) there exist constant
(z,w) i-> 0(z£+£',
numbers C > 0 and p > 0 such that
!©(*,r,)\ 2 < CGa{\i
\2p)Ga(\r,
\2p),
€ , ^ 5
c
( R x T).
WTJ+TJ')
173 In that case || H0 || 2 _ ( p + ? ) i _ < CGl(n\\
A-" \\2ns) ||
(58)
where q > 1/2 is ta&en as G Q ( n | | A - ' | | | s ) < oo. Characterizations for W ® n and for £ ( W ® " , W ® n ) are also literal translation from known results for t h e case of n = 1. Instead of the translations we shall give more practical statements. We change notation. An exponential vector for (56) is given by ^ ( * ) = e<"'*>-«'*>/ 2 ,
£G<Sc(RxT),
W i t h the identification £ = ( £ i , . . . , £„) G S(R «S'(R x T ) , (59) becomes
M*)=n
n
xeS'c(RxT).
(59)
x T ) and x — ( a ? i , . . . , xn) G
e<-*-^>-«-«»>/a=n ^t(xfc). n
fc=i
*;=i
Hence, t h e S-transform of $ G (W®™)* is identified with a function on £J C in such a way t h a t S*{£u-
. . , £ » ) = « * , 4>tx ® • • • ® ^ € - » . n
6 , •••,&. G £ C -
n
Similarly, the symbol of S G £ ( W ® , (W® )*) is defined by E(£n---.C, l ; 7 ?i.---,»7n) = ((H((/»5l
G-entire;
(F2) t/iere exisi C > 0 anrf p > 0 such that 71
2
1 ^ ( 6 , • • • , £«)| < C n
G«(| & Ip),
£l, • • • , in G -Be-
k=l
T h e o r e m A . 4 A function 0 : U c X 15 c —> C is £/ie symbol of an S G £ ( W 0 T \ (W® n )*) i/ and onfy if
operator
174 ( 0 1 ) 0 is
G-entire;
( 0 2 ) there exist constant
numbers C > 0 and p > 0 such that n
Wti,---,U,m,---,rh)\2
for£i,...,£n,r)i,...,T)n
e
T h e o r e m A . 5 A function i/ and on/y i/ ( F l ) F is
EC-
F : £Jg -> C is the S-transform
of some $ e W ® "
G-entire;
(F2) for any p > 0 i/iere exists C > 0 sztc/i £/ia£ n 2
1^(6, • • •,6.)l < c- J ] G 1/Q (| a 1%),
6 , • • •,£n e Ec.
T h e o r e m A . 6 A function 0 : E^. x E^. -> C is £Ae symbol of an E G £ ( W ® n , W ® n ) i/ and onfy if ( 0 1 ) 0 is
operator
G-entire;
( 0 2 ) / o r arai/ p > 0 there exist C > 0 and g > 0 such that n 2
l©(6, • • •,£»;m, • • • , ^ ) l < c J ] G a ( | a \2P+q)G1/a(\vk
tp),
fc=l /or^1,...,^n,rji,...,J7„ G
Ec.
References 1. S. T. Ali, J.-P. Antoine and J.-P. Gazeay: "Coherent States, Wavelets and Their Generalizations," Springer-Verlag, 2000. 2. N. Asai, I. Kubo and H.-H. Kuo: General characterization theorems and intrinsic topologies in white noise analysis, to appear in Hiroshima M a t h . J. 3 1 (2001). 3. Y. M. Berezansky and Y. G. Kondratiev: "Spectral Methods in InfiniteDimensional Analysis," Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1995. 4. D. M. Chung, U. C. Ji and N. Obata: Higher powers of quantum white noises in terms of integral kernel operators, Infinite Dimen. Anal. Quant u m P r o b a b . Rel. Top. 1 (1998), 533-559.
175 5. D. M. Chung, U. C. Ji and N. O b a t a : Quantum stochastic analysis via white noise operators in weighted Fock space, to appear in Rev. M a t h . Phys. 6. W. G. Cochran, H.-H. Kuo and A. Sengupta: A new class of white noise generalized functions, Infinite Dimen. Anal. Q u a n t u m P r o b a b . Rel. Top. 1 (1998), 43-67. 7. R. Gannoun, R. Hachaichi, H. Ouerdiane a n d A. Rezgui: Un theoreme de dualite entre espaces de fonctions holomorphes a croissance exponentielle, J. Funct. Anal. 1 7 1 (2000), 1-14. 8. L. Gross and P. Malliavin: Hall's transform and the Segal-Bargmann map, in "Ito's Stochastic Calculus and Probability Theory (N. Ikeda, S. W a t a n a b e , M. Fukushima and H. K u n i t a (Eds.)," p p . 73-116, SpringerVerlag, 1996. 9. T. Hida: "Brownian Motion," Springer-Verlag, 1980. 10. U. C. J i and N. O b a t a : A role of Bargmann-Segal spaces in characterization and expansion of operators on Fock space, preprint, 2000. 11. U. C. Ji, N. O b a t a and H. Ouerdiane: Analytic characterization of generalized Fock space operators as two-variable entire functions with growth condition, to appear in Infinite Dimen. Anal. Q u a n t u m P r o b a b . Rel. Top., 2001. 12. J. R. Klauder: The action option and a Feynman quantization of spinor fields in terms of ordinary C-numbers, Ann. Phys. 1 1 (1960), 123-168. 13. J. R. Klauder and B.-S. Skagerstam: "Coherent States," World Scientific, 1985. 14. I. K u b o and S. Takenaka: Calculus on Gaussian white noise I-IV, P r o c . J a p a n Acad. 5 6 A (1980), 376-380; 411-416; 5 7 A (1981), 433-437; 5 8 A (1982), 186-189. 15. I. K u b o and Y. Yokoi: Generalized functions and functionals in fluctuation analysis, in "Mathematical Approach to Fluctuations II (T. Hida, Ed.)," p p . 203-230, World Scientific, 1995. 16. H.-H. Kuo: "White Noise Distribution Theory," CRC Press, 1996. 17. Y.-J. Lee: Analytic version of test functionals, Fourier transform and a characterization of measures in white noise calculus, J. Funct. Anal. 1 0 0 (1991), 359-380. 18. N. O b a t a : "White Noise Calculus a n d Fock Space," Lect. Notes in M a t h . Vol. 1577, Springer-Verlag, 1994. 19. N. Obata: Integral kernel operators on Fock space - Generalizations and applications to quantum dynamics, Acta Appl. M a t h . 4 7 (1997), 49-77. 20. N. Obata: A note on Hida's whiskers and complex white noise, in "Analysis on Infinite Dimensional Lie Groups a n d Algebras (H. Heyer and J.
176 Marion, Eds.)," pp. 321-336, World Scientific, 1998. 21. N. O b a t a : Coherent state representations in white noise calculus, Can. M a t h . Soc. Conference Proceedings 29 (2000), 517-531. 22. N. Obata: Coherent state representation and unitarity condition in white noise calculus, J. Korean M a t h . Soc. 3 8 (2001), 297-309. 23. N. Obata: Unitarity criterion in white noise calculus and nonexistence of unitary evolutions driven by higher powers of quantum white noises, to appear in P r o c . Mexico G u a n a j u a t o Conference Proceedings, 2001. 24. H. Ouerdiane: Fonctionnelles analytiques avec condition de croissance, et application a I'analyse gaussienne, J a p a n . J. M a t h . 2 0 (1994), 187-198. 25. J. Potthoff and L. Streit: A characterization of Hida distributions, J. Funct. Anal. 1 0 1 (1991), 212-229. 26. Y. Yokoi: Simple setting for white noise calculus using Bargmann space and Gauss transform, Hiroshima M a t h . J. 2 5 (1995), 97-121.
Quantum Information IV (pp. 177-185) Eds. T. Hida and K. Saito © 2002 World Scientific Publishing Co. TOPICS ON COMPLEX GAUSSIAN R A N D O M FIELDS
SI SI Faculty of Information Science and Technology Aichi Prefectural University Aichi-ken 480-1198, Japan WIN WIN HTAY Department of Computational Mathematics University of Computer Studies Yangon, Myanmar
Mathematics
0
Subject Classification
(2000):
60H40
Introduction
We are interested in the complex random field which can be expressed in terms of complex white noise as
Z(C)=
[ 7(c)-
F{C;u)z(u1)--.-z(un)dun,
where C runs through t h e class C ~ = {C; C diffeomorphic to S
, convex }.
T h e z(u),u G R , denotes the complex white noise: x(u) + iy(u), where x(u) and y(u) are mutually independent real white noises. It is observed t h a t the complex r a n d o m field Z(C) is harmonic in the sense of the Gross Laplacian, and further the innovation of Z(C) is established by taking its variation. 1
Background
We are going to discuss complex Gaussian random fields given by
Z(C)=
f F(C;u)z(u1)---z{un)durl, 7(C)"
(1.1)
178 which is parameterized by C in C
1
:
C d _ 1 = {C; diffeomorphic to 5 d _ 1 , convex}, where (C) denotes the domain enclosed by C. T h e z(u),u G Rd denotes the d-dimensional parameter complex white noise which is expressible as z{u) — x(u) + iy(u), x , y being mutually independent real white noises. As t h e background, we first recall the complex Gaussian systems and the complex white noise. 1.1 C o m p l e x G a u s s i a n S y s t e m Let {Q., B, P) be a probability space and let Z(w) be a complex-valued r a n d o m variable on (f2, B, P), such t h a t E(X(u>)) — m, m G C( complex numbers ), Re(Z{u)) = X(u) and Im(Z(u)) = Y(iv). D e f i n i t i o n If X(LJ) and Y(w) are independent and they have the same Gaussian distribution with mean zero, then
Z(u>) = m + X(v) is called complex
+ iY(uj)
Gaussian.
D e f i n i t i o n Let Z = {Z\(tv); X £ A} b e a system of complex-valued r a n d o m variables. If any linear combination £ ? • CjZ\ , Cj G C, is complex Gaussian, then Z is called a complex Gaussian system. T h e o r e m For any vector m = (m.\;A G A) and positive definite matrix V = ( V A , ^ ; A , ^ G A) on A, there exists a complex Gaussian system Z = {Z\ : A G A} with a mean vector and a covariance matrix which coincides with the given vector m and the matrix V , respectively. Let the random variable Z(LJ) be complex Gaussian, z £ C b e a complex variable, and t and s be arbitrary complex numbers. We have 1. E[expi(tZ
+ sZ)] = exp[i(tm+sm)
— tsa2], where m = E(Z)and
2
E[\Z-m\ }. 2. If E[Z] = 0, then we have
E[exP(tZ)}
= 1, E[Zn]
= 0, n > 0, E[ZnZm)
=
8n!mn\E[{\Z\2}n].
a2 —
179 3. Let Hp,q{z,z) rnite polynomial
= (-l^+'el^^f^eH2!2, p,q > 0, b e the complex of degree (p, q). Then, the system of functions of Z(ui)
Her-
Up\ql)-SHPtq(Z(U),2(u>));p,q>0}, is an orthonomal system in L 2 (fi, P). (See e.g. [2].) 1.2
C o m p l e x white noise
Let Ec = E + iE and E* = E*+iE* with a nuclear space E{c L2(Rd)). Denote £ 6 Ec by £ = £ + irj, £,rj £ E. Then, z e E* is of the form z = x + iy,x,y € E*. Set v = /ii x /i2, where /xi and /^2 \ on E*(= iE*)such t h a t
exp[i(x,£)]dfj,j(x) JE
are
white noise measures with variance
= exp
-\m\2
, J = 1,2.
Let B be the smallest sigma field generated by the cylinder subsets of E*. Then, (E*,B,i/) is called a complex white noise. T h e class
H° = { ( z , C ) ; C e . E c } is a complex Gaussian system on (E*, B, is), and so is 7i° = {(z, £); £ £ We have
*.C>]= /
Ec}.
(z,0d„(z) = 0, £[
JE'C
where || • || denotes the L2(i?)-norm.
T h e covariance m a t r i x of "H0 is given by
E[(z,(i)KGJ] = {(!,&)• 1.3. C o m p l e x m u l t i p l e W i e n e r i n t e g r a l of d e g r e e
(m,n)
Denote the subspace of {L2C) spanned by t h e Fourier-Hermite polynomials of degree (m,n) based u p o n a complete orthonormal system {ivn} by T-L(m,n)Some known results are now in order. 1. T h e family of all functionals of the form
180 where the product is finite and the _/Vs are distinct, is a complete orthonomal system in (L2.). 2. An element of %(„,_„) is now called a complex multiple Wiener integral of degree (771,71). Set n n — k,k) 5
fc=0
which is the collection of members of degree n. T h e space (L2) has therefore the direct sum decomposition
(E © n
fc=0
\
W
<-M> /
00
= nE= 0© W »
3. A member ip(z) in T-L(n^) has an integral representation of the form
F(u)z(Ul)---z(un)dun,
where F is a symmetric L 2 (iZ n )-function. (For simplicity d is taken to be 1.) A generalization of such a representation can be obtained for any H(m,n) -functional. 2
C o m p l e x G a u s s i a n r a n d o m field
Define a complex Gaussian r a n d o m field Z(C) Z{C)=
f
by
F(C;u)z(Ul)---z{un)dun,
(2.1)
He) where C"*"1 = {C; C S C 2 , diffeomorphic to S^1},
(2.2)
and z = x + iy is a complex white noise. Let (i) Let Lc be t h e closed sbspace of L2(E*,v) volving the (z,0, supp(() C (C).
generated by t h e algebra in-
(ii) the sigma field B( C j is the smallest sigma field of subsets of E* with respect to which all members in Lc are measurable.
181 Obviously Z(C)
lives in the space Lc
and
LcCL2(B{c),v)c(L2c).
Proposition. Set L = \jcLc (the lattice sum). Then, we have a direct sum decomposition of the space L:
n
As in [3], we can introduce the differential operators where t h e white noises x(u) and y(u) are taken to be variables. Namely, d dx(u)'
d dy(u)
as well as the higher order partial derivatives. Indeed, they can be defined rigorously by using our standard technique of white noise analysis, although one might think the variables have a formalsignificance. Moreover, we can introduce the Gross Laplacian A Q with or without restriction of the domain of the parameter u. For instance, r g2 Q2 A
°(C) = /
7TT^\dud-
[FTU +
J(C) dx{uY
dy(uy
By expressing z as x + iy, we can easily see t h a t
f * y z ( C )+f * Vz(c)=0 \dx(u)) holds for Z(C)
K
K
^ydyiu))
>
given by (2.1). Thus, we have (AG)(C)(Z(C))
= 0. d
W i t h a particular choice of (C) — R
we can define AG(Rd)
which is
simply denoted by A c T h e o r e m 1. For any C the random field Z{C) = Z(C, z) is harmonic
in the
sense of the Gross Laplacian A g . R e m a r k Before closing this section we shall make a short, general remark on the representation of a stochastic process or a random field which is expressed
182 as a stochastic integral with respect to a r a n d o m measure. T h e notion of the canonical kernel was first introduced when t h e canonical representation of a Gaussian process was introduceed. This particular property of a representation means t h a t , intuitively speaking, the random measure and the represented process have exactly the same information until any fixed time. Hence, there is no need to restrict the process to be Gaussian to define the canonical property of the kernel. W i t h this understanding, we have the freedom to use the established criterion for t h e kernel to b e canonical, in the case where t h e given process or the r a n d o m field is expressed as a stochastic integral. W i t h this remark, we assume t h a t the kernel F in the integral of the form (2.1) is always taken to b e canonical, in what follows.
3
Innovation
It is known t h a t the infinitesimal equation (the stochastic variational equation) for a real Gaussian random field X(C) can be defined as a generalization of the Levy's infinitesimal equation for the variation 5X(t) of a stochastic process X(t). For the case of a random field X(C), the equation for the variation 5X(C) may be expressed in the form
5X(C) = $(X(C") C < C, Y(a), seC,C,
SC),
(3.1)
where C < C means t h a t C" is inside of C, t h a t is, the domain ( C ) enclosed by C is a subset of (C), and where
183
6Z(C) = $(Z{C);
C < C, z(s), z(s), s e C,C, 5C),
where C < C means, as before, that C" is inside of C, and where $ is a nonrandom function. The system {z(s), z(s), s G C;C} is the innovation in the sense that the family of the pairs {z(s),z(s),s 6 C,} is independent of the past {Z(C'),C < C} and that it describes the new information gained by Z(C) in the infinitesimal neighbourhood of C. Remark. For the innovation it suffices for us to obtain either one of z(s) and z(s) from 5Z(C), since the other is complex conjugate. Theorem 2.
The innovation for the random field Z[C) given by (3.2) is
l ,M z(s) = ^ {
rSZ(C)-E(5Z(C)\Z(C'),C'
(,)}, s G C,
(3.2)
where
5Z(C) = n[ f Jc J{c)"-1
+ f f F'n(C,u;s)zn®{u)8n{s)dunds, n Jc J(c)
(3.3)
where v\ = (ui,U2,--- ,u„_i) and F'n denotes the functional derivative of F{C\ u) evaluated at C. Now take the weak conditional expectation E which is defined by the orthogonal projection: E(SZ(C)\Z(C'),C
f
f
F'n{C,u;s)zn®(u)5n(s)dunds.
Then, we have 5Z(C) - E(6Z\Z(C),
C < C)
= n f [ F{C,v1;s)z(n-1)^{v1)z(s)dv1l-16n{s)ds. l Jc J(c)"~
(3.4)
184 Let 5n vary all over in the class of positive C°° —functions in such a way t h a t 5C is taken outward and t h a t the integrand over C is determined as a function of t h e variable s. Then, the right hand side of (3.5) will determine the following
z(s)
F{C,v1]a)z^-1^{v1)dvr1.
[
(3-5)
./(C) —
Let it be denoted as
z(*M«)
(3-6)
and use the same technique as in one dimensional parameter cace (cf. [4]). Thus, we know the value ip{s)2.
(3.7)
We may ignore its sign to determine <£>(s) . Divide (3.7) by f(s) to obtain the generalized innovation z(s) for a moment. Since the representation is cannonical, it can b e regarded as the same as the original complex white noise z(s). This means t h a t it is the real innovation (not in a generalized sense). T h e Theorem is therefore proved. It should be noted t h a t the equation (3.2) gives the original complex white noise z in (2.1), because the kernel F is canonical. However, if the kernel F is not cannonical, we can see an example such t h a t the following inequality holds. 5Z{C) - E{SZ\Z(C), n f
[
1
C
F(C,v1;s)z{n~1)®{v1)z{s)dv^-15n(s)ds.
(3.8)
Jc J(c)"-
Hence, in such a case we are given a generalized innovation which may be different from t h e original z. R e m a r k . T h e innovation z(s) can not be obtained in LQ, however it can exist in the space (L^). Now, as an appendix, we wish to note some elementary, but useful relationships among t h e real stochastic processes arising from the Fourier transform of white noise.
185 Take a real white noise x(t). can b e expressed in the form
Then, the Fourier transform x(A) of
x(X) = xr(X) + iii{\) where xr(X) the form
x(t)
(3.9)
and X{(X) are real valued. Then, we have formal expressions of 1
xr(X) =
f°° / cosXux(u)du V27T J-ca
(3.10)
i r00 £i(A) = _ / sin Xux(u)du. V27T 7-cx)
(3-H)
x(X) = x(-X).
(3.12)
Thus, we see t h a t
F a c t . {x,.(A), A > 0} and {x;(A), A > 0} are (real) white noises and {£(A), A > 0} is a complex white noise. A c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s T h e authors are grateful to t h e organizers of the Quant u m Information Conference who gave the opportunity to present the results reported in this paper.
References 1. T. Hida, Cannonical representation of Gaussian processes and their applications, Mem. Coll. Sci. Univ. Kyoto, 33 (1960), 258-351. 2. T. Hida, Brownian motion, Springer-Verlag. 1980. 3. T. Hida et al. W h i t e noise. An infinite dimensional calculus, Kluwer Academic P u b . 1993. 4. T. Hida and Si Si, Innovations for random fields. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Q u a n t u m Probability and Related Topics Vol 1, No. 4, World Scientific P u b . Co. (1998), 499-510. 5. Si Si, Gaussian processes and Gaussian random fields. Q u a n t u m Information II, ed. by T.Hida and K. Saito, World Scientific P u b . Co. 2000, 195-204. 6. Si Si, R a n d o m fields and multiple Markov properties. Supplementary Papers for the Second International Conference on Unconventional Models of Computation U M C 2 K , C D M T C S 147, Solvay Institute 2000, 64-70.
This page is intentionally left blank
Quantum Information IV (pp. 187-200) Eds. T. Hida and K. Saito © 2002 World Scientific Publishing Co.
Q U A N T U M INFORMATION IN SPACE A N D TIME A N D THEORY OF S T O C H A S T I C PROCESSES I G O R V. V O L O V I C H Steklov Mathematical Institute Gubkin St.8, 117966 Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Many important results in modern quantum information theory have been obtained for an idealized situation when the spacetime dependence of quantum phenomena is neglected. We emphasize the importance of the investigation of quantum information in space and time. Entangled states in space and time are considered. A modification of Bell's equation which includes the spacetime variables is suggested. A general relation between quantum theory and theory of classical stochastic processes is proposed which expresses the condition of local realism in the form of a noncommutative spectral theorem. Applications of this relation to the security of quantum key distribution in quantum cryptography are considered.
1
Introduction
Recent remarkable experimental and theoretical results have shown that quantum effects can provide qualitatively new forms of communication and computation, sometimes more powerful then the classical ones, for a review see e.g. [1]. Interesting and important results obtained in quantum computing, teleportation and cryptography are based on the investigation of basic properties of quantum mechanics. Especially important are properties of nonfactorized entangled states which were named by Schrodinger as the most characteristic feature of quantum mechanics. Modern quantum information theory is built on ideas of classical information theory of C. Shannon and on the notions of von Neumann quantum mechanical entropy and of entangled states as formulated by J. Bell, see [2] for a recent review. The spacetime dependence is not explicitly indicated in this approach. As a result, many important achievements in modern quantum information theory have been obtained for an idealized situation when the spacetime dependence of quantum phenomena is neglected. We emphasize the importance of the investigation of quantum information effects in space and time. a "The importance of the investigation of quantum information effects in space and time and especially the role of relativistic invariance in classical and quantum information theory was stressed in the talk by the author at the round table at the First International Conference on Quantum Information which was held at Meijo University, November 4-8, 1997.
188 In this paper entangled states in space and time are considered. A modification of Bell's equation which includes t h e spacetime variables is suggested. A general relation between q u a n t u m theory and classical theory of stochastic processes is proposed which expresses the condition of local realism in the form of a noncommutative spectral theorem. Applications of this relation to t h e security of q u a n t u m key distribution in q u a n t u m cryptography are considered. Entangled states, i.e. the states of two particles with the wave function which is not a product of t h e wave functions of single particles, have been studied in many theoretical and experimental works starting from works of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen, Bohm and Bell, see e.g. [3]. Bell's theorem [4] states t h a t there are q u a n t u m spin correlation functions t h a t can not b e represented as classical correlation functions of separated random variables. It has been interpreted as incompatibility of the requirement of locality with t h e statistical predictions of q u a n t u m mechanics [4]. For a recent discussion of Bell's theorem see, for example [3] - [9] and references therein. It is now widely accepted, as a result of Bell's theorem and related experiments, t h a t "Einstein's local realism" must b e rejected. Let us note however t h a t , evidently, t h e very formulation of t h e problem of locality in q u a n t u m mechanics is based on ascribing a special role to the position in ordinary three-dimensional space. It is rather surprising therefore t h a t the space dependence of the wave function is neglected in discussions of the problem of locality in relation to Bell's inequalities. Actually it is the space p a r t of t h e wave function which is relevant t o t h e consideration of t h e problem of locality. We know t h a t the wave function of particle includes not only the spin p a r t but also the part depending on spacetime variables. Recently it was pointed out [9] t h a t in fact the spacetime part of the wave function was neglected in the proof of Bell's theorem. However just t h e spacetime part is crucial for considerations of property of locality of q u a n t u m system. Actually the spacetime part leads to an extra factor in q u a n t u m correlations and as a result t h e ordinary proof of Bell's theorem fails in this case. We present a modification of Bell's equation which includes space and time variables. We present a criterion of locality (or nonlocality) of q u a n t u m theory in a realist model of hidden variables. We argue t h a t predictions of q u a n t u m mechanics can be consistent with Bell's inequalities for some Gaussian wave functions a n d hence Einstein's local realism is restored in this case. Moreover we show t h a t due to the expansion of the wave packet t h e locality criterion is always satisfied for nonrelativistic particles if regions of detectors are far enough from each other. This result has applications to t h e security of certain
189 q u a n t u m cryptographic protocols. We will consider an important connection between q u a n t u m mechanics and theory of classical stochastic processes. Consider for example an equation cos(a - (3) = Eia-qp where £a and rjp are two r a n d o m processes [10] and E is the expectation. Bell's theorem states t h a t there exists no solution of t h e equation for bounded stochastic processes such t h a t |£ Q | < 1, \T)p\ < 1. T h e function cos(a —/3) describes the q u a n t u m mechanical correlation of spins of two entangled particles. It was shown in [9] t h a t if one takes into account the space p a r t of the wave function t h e n the q u a n t u m correlation in the simplest case will take the form 5rcos(a — /3) instead of just cos(a — /3) where t h e parameter g describes the location of the system in space and time. In this case one gets a modified equation g cos (a - 0) = E£ar)p One can prove (see below) t h a t if g is small enough then there exists a solution of the modified equation. It is i m p o r t a n t to study also t h e more general question: which class of functions / ( s , t) admits a representation of t h e form f(s,t)
=
Exsyt
where xs and yt are bounded stochastic processes and also analogous question for the functions of several variables f{t\,..., tn). Bell's theorem constitutes an important p a r t in q u a n t u m cryptography [11]. It is now generally accepted t h a t techniques of q u a n t u m cryptography can allow secure communications between distant parties [12] - [19]. T h e promise of secure cryptographic q u a n t u m key distribution schemes is based on t h e use of q u a n t u m entanglement in the spin space and on q u a n t u m nocloning theorem. An important contribution of q u a n t u m cryptography is a mechanism for detecting eavesdropping. However in certain current q u a n t u m cryptography protocols the space p a r t of t h e wave function is neglected. B u t just the space part of t h e wave function describes the behaviour of particles in ordinary real three-dimensional space. As a result such schemes can be secure against eavesdropping attacks in t h e abstract spin space but could be insecure in t h e real three-dimensional space. We will discuss how one can try to improve the security of q u a n t u m cryptography schemes in space by using a special preparation of the space p a r t of t h e wave function, see [18]. Note t h a t some problems of q u a n t u m teleportation in space have been discussed in [20].
190 2
Bell's T h e o r e m
In the presentation of Bell's theorem we will follow also more references. Bell's theorem reads:
[9] where one can find
cos(a - (3) ? EtaTip
(1)
where £a and r\p are two r a n d o m processes such t h a t |£ Q | < 1, |T?/31 < 1 ar >d E is the expectation. In more details: T h e o r e m 1. There exists no probability space (A, T, dp{\)) and a pair of stochastic processes £ a = £ a (A), r\p = ^ ( A ) , 0 < a,(3 < 2~K which obey lf«(A)| < 1, |»?/9(A)| < 1 such t h a t the following equation is valid cos(a -13) = E£arjp
(2)
for all a and f3. Here the expectation is EtaVfi = f
fa(A)^(A)dp(A)
JA
We say t h a t Eq.
(2) has no solutions (A, T, dp(\),
£a, r\p) with the b o u n d
16.1 < i, \nP\ < i. We will prove the theorem below. Let us discuss now t h e physical interpretation of this result. Consider a pair of spin one-half particles formed in t h e singlet spin s t a t e and moving freely towards two detectors. If one neglects the space p a r t of the wave function then one has t h e Hilbert space C 2
CTI =
(?U)'
cr2 =
(!7)'
CT3 =
(L°I)'
3
t=l
and
^" = 7l((?) 0 (o)-(o)K?))
191
If the vectors a and b belong to the same plane then one can write —a • b = cos(a—/3) and hence Bell's theorem states that the function Dspin(a, b) Eq. (3) can not be represented in the form
P(a,b) = J t(a,\)ri{b,\)dp{\)
(4)
i.e. Dspin(a,b)^P{a,b)
(5)
Here £(a, A) and -q(b, A) are random fields on the sphere, |£(a, A)| < 1, \rj{b, A)| < 1 and dp(X) is a positive probability measure, Jdp(X) = 1. The parameters A are interpreted as hidden variables in a realist theory. It is clear that Eq. (5) can be reduced to Eq. (1). To prove Theorem 1 we will use the following Theorem 2. Let / i , /2, g\ and g2 be random variables on the probability space (A,T,dp(X)) such that l/i(A)fli(A)| < 1, i,j = 1,2. Denote Pij=Efigj,
i,j = 1,2.
Then \Pn-Pi2\
+ \P2i + P22\<2.
Proof of Theorem 2. One has Pu - P12 = Efl9l
- Ehg2
= E(fm{l
± / 2 5 2 ) ) - E{hg2{l
±
f2gi))
Hence |Pn - P u | < E(l ± f2g2) + E ( l ± f29l)
= 2 ± (P22 + P21)
Now let us note that if x and y are two real numbers, then \x\<2±y
-•
H + |y|<2.
Therefore taking x = Pu — P\2 and y = P22 + P 2 i one gets the bound \Pll-Pl2\
+
\P2l+P22\<2.
The theorem is proved. The last inequality is called the Clauser-Horn-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality. By using notations of Eq. (4) one has \P(a, b) - P(a, b')\ + \P(a', b) + P{a', b')\ < 2
(6)
192 for any four unit vectors a, b, a', b'. P r o o f o f T h e o r e m 1. Let us denote /i(A) = e«.(A), gj(X) = r1l3j(X), for some ai,f3j.
i,j = 1,2
If one would have cos ( a ; - / ? . , ) =
Efigj
then due to Theorem 2 one should have | c o s ( a i - f3i) - cos(ai — /3 2 )| + | cos(a 2 - Pi) + cos(a 2 — /?2)| < 2. However for a.\ = vr/2, a 2 = 0, /3i = n/4,f32
— —n/4 we obtain
I c o s ^ — Pi) - cos(a! —/9 2 )| + | c o s ( a 2 —fix) + cos(a 2 - P2)\ = 2\/2 which is greater t h a n 2. This contradiction proves Theorem 1. It will b e shown below t h a t if one takes into account the space part of the wave function then the q u a n t u m correlation in the simplest case will take the form g c o s ( a — /3) instead of just cos(a — /3) where t h e parameter g describes the location of t h e system in space and time. In this case one can get a representation g cos(a -(3)
= E£ar]p
(7)
if g is small enough. T h e factor g gives a contribution to visibility or efficiency of detectors t h a t are used in the phenomenological description of detectors. 3
Localized Detectors
In t h e previous section the space part of the wave function of the particles was neglected. However exactly the space part is relevant to t h e discussion of locality. T h e Hilbert space assigned to one particle with spin 1/2 is C 2 ® L 2 ( K 3 ) and the Hilbert space of two particles is C 2
G(a, 0A,b,
GB) = (xl>\a • aPOA
®
(8)
193
Here PQ is the projection operator onto the region O. Let us consider the case when the wave function has the form of the product of the spin function and the space function ip — ipapin
b)
(9)
where the function g(0A,0B)=
|0( r i ,r 2 )| 2 dndr 2
f
(10)
JOAxOB
describes correlation of particles in space. It is the probability to find one particle in the region OA and another particle in the region OB. One has
o
(n)
Remark. In relativistic quantum field theory there is no nonzero strictly localized projection operator that annihilates the vacuum. It is a consequence of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem. Therefore, apparently, the function g(0A, OB) should be always strictly smaller than 1. Now one inquires whether one can write the representation g(0A,0B)Dspin(a,b)=
U{a,0A,\)v(b,0B,X)dp{\)
(12)
Note that if we are interested in the conditional probability of finding the projection of spin along vector a for the particle 1 in the region OA and the projection of spin along the vector b for the particle 2 in the region OB then we have to divide both sides of Eq. (12) by g(0A, OB). Instead of Eq (2) in Theorem 1 now we have the modified equation g cos{a - P) = E^rtf
(13)
The factor g is important. In particular one can write the following representation [8] for 0 < g < 1/2: /
gcos(a-(3)=
v
Jo
2scos(a-A)v/2^cos(/3-A)—
(14)
27T
Therefore if 0 < g < 1/2 then there exists a solution of Eq. (13) where &»(A) = y/2gcos(a-
A), rj^(A) = y ^ c o s ^ - A)
and |£ Q | < 1, | ^ | < 1. If g > l / \ / 2 then it follows from Theorem 2 that there is no solution to Eq. (13). We have obtained
194 T h e o r e m 3 . If g > l / \ / 2 t h e n there is no solution (A, J-, dp(\), £a,77,a) to Eq. (13) with the bounds |£„| < 1, \qp\ < 1. If 0 < g < 1/2 t h e n there exists a solution to Eq. (13) with the bounds |£ Q | < 1, \r}p\ < 1. R e m a r k . A local modified equation reads |^(r1,r2,t)|2cos(a-/3) = ^(a,r1,t)r?(/a,r2,i). Relativistic Particles We can not immediately apply the previous considerations to t h e case of relativistic particles such as photons and the Dirac particles because in these cases t h e wave function can not b e represented as a product of t h e spin p a r t and the spacetime part. Let us show t h a t t h e wave function of photon can not be represented in the product form. Let Ai(k) be the wave function of photon, where i = 1, 2, 3 and k S M.3. O n e has t h e gauge condition klAi{k) — 0. If one supposes t h a t the wave function has a product form Ai(k) =
Tr{pAil...AiJ
= EZil..4in
If t h e family {Aa} would be a maximal commutative family of self-adjoint operators then t h e previous representation would be nothing but the usual spectral theorem [21]. In our case the family {Aa} consists from not necessary commuting operators. Hence we can call such a representation a noncommutative spectral representation. Of course one has a question for which families of operators and states the noncommutative spectral theorem is valid, i.e. when we can write t h e noncommutative spectral representation. It would b e helpful t o study t h e following problem: describe t h e class of functions f(t\, ...,£„) which admits t h e representation of the form
f(t1,...,tn) where xt,..., 1.
=
Exh...ztn
zt are r a n d o m processes which obey the bounds |ast| < 1,..., | z t | <
195
From the previous discussion we know that there are such families of operators and such states which do not admit the noncommutative spectral representation and therefore they do not satisfy the condition of local realism. Indeed let us take the Hilbert space % = C 2
/ s i n a i cosa, \ ycosai — s i n a j y
/ s i n a 2 cosa 2 \ 0 ycosa^ — sin 0:2/
f
and ^-cospi
sin/?! y
y-cosp2
sinft
/
Here operators A^ correspond to operators a- a and operators B; corresponds to operators a-b where a = (cos a, 0, sin a), b = (— cos/3, 0, — sin/3). Operators v4, commute with operators Bj, [Ai, Bj] = 0, i, j = 1,2 and one has {i>spin\AiBj\tj)1,pin) = cos(ai - f3j), i,j = 1, 2 We know from Theorem 2 that this function can not be represented as the expected value E£ii~)j of random variables with the bounds |&| < 1, |?7j| < 1. However, as it was discussed in this paper, the space part of the wave function was neglected in the previous consideration. It is tempting to speculate that in physics one could have only such states and observables which satisfy the condition of local realism. Perhaps we should restrict ourself in this proposal to the consideration of only such families of observables which satisfy the condition of relativistic local causality. Let us now apply these considerations to quantum cryptography. 4
The Quantum Key Distribution
There are quantum cryptographic protocols with one and with two particles, for a review see for example [19]. Here we shall consider the quantum key distribution with two particles. Ekert [11] showed that one can use the EinsteinPodolsky-Rosen correlations to establish a secret random key between two parties ("Alice" and "Bob"). Bell's inequalities are used to check the presence of an intermediate eavesdropper ("Eve"). There are two stages to the quantum cryptographic protocol, the first stage over a quantum channel, the second over a public channel. The quantum channel consists of a source that emits pairs of spin onehalf particles, in a singlet state. The particles fly apart towards Alice and Bob, who, after the particles have separated, perform measurements on spin
196 components along one of three directions, given by unit vectors a and 6. In the second stage Alice and Bob communicate over a public channel.They announce in public the orientation of the detectors they have chosen for particular measurements. T h e n they divide t h e measurement results into two separate groups: a first group for which they used different orientation of the detectors, and a second group for which they used the same orientation of the detectors. Now Alice and Bob can reveal publicly the results they obtained b u t within t h e first group of measurements only. This allows them, by using Bell's inequality, to establish the presence of an eavesdropper (Eve). T h e results of t h e second group of measurements can be converted into a secret key. One supposes t h a t Eve has a detector which is located within the region OE and she is described by hidden variables A. We will interpret Eve as a hidden variable in a realist theory and will study whether the q u a n t u m correlation can b e represented in t h e form Eq. (12). From Theorem 3 one can see t h a t if t h e following inequality g(oA,
oB)
< 1/2
(15)
is valid for regions OA and OB which are well separated from one another then there is no violation of t h e CHSH inequalities (6) and therefore Alice and Bob can not detect the presence of an eavesdropper. On the other side, if for a pair of well separated regions OA and OB one has 9(OA,OB)
>l/v / 2
(16)
then it could be a violation of the realist locality in these regions for a given state. Then, in principle, one can hope to detect an eavesdropper in these circumstances. Note t h a t if we set g(0A, OB) = 1 in (12) as it was done in the original proof of Bell's theorem, t h e n it means we did a special preparation of the states of particles to be completely localized inside of detectors. There exist such well localized states (see however t h e previous Remark) but there exist also another states, with the wave functions which are not very well localized inside t h e detectors, and still particles in such states are also observed in detectors. T h e fact t h a t a particle is observed inside the detector does not mean, of course, t h a t its wave function is strictly localized inside the detector before the measurement. Actually one has to perform a thorough investigation of the preparation and the evolution of our entangled states in space and time if one needs to estimate the function g(0A, Og).
197 4-1
Gaussian
Wave
Functions
Now let us consider t h e criterion of locality for Gaussian wave functions. We will show t h a t with a reasonable accuracy there is no violation of locality in this case. Let us take the wave function
Itfi Wl2 = (^) 3/2 e- mV/2 ,|<Mr)| 2 = A ^
e
- ^ " ^
(17)
We suppose t h a t the length of the vector 1 is much larger t h a n 1/m. We can make measurements of PQA and PQB for any well separated regions OA and OB- Let us suppose a rather nonfavorite case for the criterion of locality when the wave functions of the particles are almost localized inside t h e regions OA and OB respectively. In such a case the function g(0A, OB) can take values near its maximum. We suppose t h a t the region OA is given by \ri\ < 1/m, r = (7*1, r2,r3) and t h e region OB is obtained from OA by translation on 1. Hence I/>I(TI) is a Gaussian function with modules appreciably different from zero only in OA and similarly ^2(^2) ls localized in the region OB- Then we have
9(0Al OB) = ( - L f e-»2/2dx) \ V27T J-l
(18)
J
One can estimate (18) as
g(0A,0B)<(^]
(19)
which is smaller t h a n 1/2. Therefore the locality criterion (15) is satisfied in this case. Let us remind t h a t there is a well known effect of expansion of wave packets due to the free time evolution. If e is t h e characteristic length of the Gaussian wave packet describing a particle of mass M at time t = 0 then at time t the characteristic length et will be
I
h?t2
,v
It tends to (h/Me)t as t -4 00. Therefore the locality criterion is always satisfied for nonrelativistic particles if regions OA and OB are far enough from each other.
198 5
Conclusions
We have studied some problems in q u a n t u m information theory which requires the inclusion of spacetime variables. In particular entangled states in space and time are considered. A modification of Bell's equation which includes t h e spacetime variables is suggested a n d investigated. A general relation between q u a n t u m theory and theory of classical stochastic processes was suggested which expresses t h e condition of local realism in the form of a noncommutative spectral theorem. Applications of this relation to t h e security of q u a n t u m key distribution in q u a n t u m cryptography were considered. There are many interesting open problems in t h e approach to q u a n t u m information in space a n d time discussed in this paper. Some of t h e m related with t h e noncommutative spectral theory and theory of classical stochastic processes have been discussed above. In q u a n t u m cryptography there are important open problems which require further investigations. In q u a n t u m cryptographic protocols with two entangled photons to detect t h e eavesdropper's presence by using Bell's inequality we have to estimate t h e function g(OA,Og). To increase t h e detectability of t h e eavesdropper one has to do a thorough investigation of t h e process of preparation of t h e entangled s t a t e and then its evolution in space and time towards Alice a n d Bob. One has to develop a proof of t h e security of such a protocol. In t h e previous section E v e was interpreted as a n abstract hidden variable. However one can assume t h a t more information about Eve is available. In particular one can assume t h a t she is located somewhere in space in a region OE- It seems one has to study a generalization of t h e function g(OA,Os), which depends not only on t h e Alice a n d Bob locations OA a n d OB b u t also depends on the Eve location OE, a n d try to find a strategy which leads to an optimal value of this function.
Acknowledgments I a m grateful to Prof. T. Hida a n d Prof. K. Saito for t h e invitation to the stimulating and fruitful conference on Q u a n t u m Information at Meijo University. This work was supported in part by R F F I 99-0100866 a n d by INTAS 99-00545 grants.
199 References 1. Q u a n t u m Information, eds. T. Hida nnd K. Saito, (World Scintific, Singapore, 1999). 2. Masanori Ohya, A mathematical foundation of quantum information and quantum computer - on quantum mutual entropy and entanglement, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9808051. 3. A. Afriat and F. Selleri, The Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen Paradox in Atomic, Nuclear, and Particle Physics, Plenum Press, 1999. 4. J.S. Bell, Physics, 1, 195 (1964). 5. W . M . de Muynck, W. De Baere and H. Martens, Found, of Physics, 23,1589(1994). 6. Luigi Accardi and Massimo Regoli, Locality and Bell's inequality, quantph/0007005. 7. Andrei Khrennikov, Non-Kolmogorov probability and modified Bell's inequality, quant-ph/0003017. 8. I. Volovich, Ya. Volovich, Bell's Theorem and Random Variables, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0009058. 9. Igor V. Volovich, Bell's Theorem and Locality in Space, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0012010. 10. T. Hida, Brownian Motion, Springer-Verlag, 1980. 11. A.K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 7 , 661 (1991). 12. S. Wiesner, Conjugate coding, S I G A C T News, 15:1 (1983) pp.78-88. 13. C.H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, in: Proc. of the IEEE Inst. Conf. on Comuters, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India (IEEE, New York,1984) p.175 14. Nicolas Gisin, Grigoire Ribordy, Wolfgang Tittel, Hugo Zbinden, Quantum Cryptography, h t t p : / / x x x . l a n l . g o v / a b s / q u a n t - p h / 0 1 0 1 0 9 8 . 15. Dominic Mayers, Unconditional security in Quantum Cryptography, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9802025. 16. Hoi-Kwong Lo, H. F . Chau Unconditional Security Of Quantum Key Distribution Over Arbitrarily Long Distances, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9803006. 17. Peter W. Shor and J o h n Preskill, Simple Proof of Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/quant-ph/0003004. 18. Igor V. Volovich, An Attack to Quantum Cryptography from Space, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0012054. 19. I.V. Volovich and Ya.I. Volovich, On Classical and Quantum Cryptog-
200 raphy, Lectures at t h e Volterra-CIRM International School " Q u a n t u m Computer and Q u a n t u m Information", Trento, Italy, July 25-31, 2001 (to be published). 20. K. Fihtener and M. Ohya, Quantum teleportation and beam splitting, to b e published in C o m m . M a t h . P h y s . 21. K. Yosida, Functional Analysis, Springer-Verlag, 1965.