M E M O R Y , 1 9 9 8 , 6 (4 ), 3 3 7 ±3 3 8
S u r v e y in g M e m o r y P r o c e ss e s: In tr o d u c tio n
In a ...
32 downloads
976 Views
2MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
M E M O R Y , 1 9 9 8 , 6 (4 ), 3 3 7 ±3 3 8
S u r v e y in g M e m o r y P r o c e ss e s: In tr o d u c tio n
In a fam o us a nd co n trov e rsia l sp e ec h to the in a u gu ra l co n fere n ce on ``P ra ctica l A spe c ts o f M em o ry C on fe ren c e’ ’ , U lric N e iss er (1 9 7 8) arg u e d tha t th e first 10 0 y ea rs o f m e m o ry re sea rch failed to illum in ate h ow m em ory op e rate s in th e rea l w orld . W h ile so m e a pp lie d rese arc h ex iste d at th a t tim e , the m o v e m e n t to w a rd s w ha t is som e tim es c alled ``e ve ry d ay m em ory ’ ’ rap id ly e x pa n d ed a s m a n y to o k u p h is ch a lle n ge . A t ab o u t th e sam e tim e , su rve y a nd m em ory rese a rch e rs sta rte d to disc uss th e lo n g -sta nd in g p ro ble m of ob ta in ing ac cu ra te re p or ts fro m su rv e y resp o n d en ts ab o u t th eir p a st e x pe rie n c es a n d be h av iou rs. B a d de le y (1 9 7 9) w a s ask e d to ta k e p art in on e o f th e e arly g a th e rin g s o f m em ory a n d su rv e y rese arc h e rs (M oss & G o ld stein , 1 9 7 9 ). H e a lm o st d ec lin e d the in v ita tio n b ec au se the re w as so little m e m o ry rese a rch th at d irec tly a d dre sse d th e su rv e y rese arc h e rs’ co n c ern s. H o w ev e r, lik e N e isse r, h e rea lise d th a t m em ory rese arc h sh ou ld b e ap p lic ab le to to p ic s su ch as th e re lia b ility a n d v alidity o f surv e ys. In the fo llo w in g 2 0 y e ars th ere ha s b ee n a sign ific a n t e ffort to u n de rsta n d m e m o ry erro rs in su rv ey s. M e m o ry e rro rs a re ju st on e ty p e o f e rro r th at a rise in surv e y s. It is im p o rta n t to e xa m in e th e se e rro rs in c on te x t a nd w ith h isto rica l p e rsp e ctiv e (O ’ M u irch e arta ig h , 1 9 9 7). In g en e ral, su rv e y re sea rc he rs disting u ish sa m p lin g (in clu din g n on -resp o n se) an d m ea su rem e nt e rror. S am p lin g e rro r h as b ee n stu die d sin c e th e turn of th e (la st) ce n tury an d is no w w e ll d ev e lo p e d in sta tistic al th e o ry. P sy ch o log ica l th eo ry a nd rese arc h h a s fo cu se d m o re o n m ea sure m en t e rro r. T h e first p sy ch o lo gists to w o rk on surv ey s w ere in the 1 9 2 0s an d 1 9 30 s. T he se inc lud e d T hu rston e (1 9 2 8) a nd L ik ert (1 9 3 2). In 1 9 4 8 th e Institu te o f S o c ia l R ese arc h (IS R ) w as fo rm e d a t th e U n iv ersity o f M ic h iga n , co m b in ing in tere sts o f th e S u rve y R e sea rch C e nte r an d th e R e sea rc h C e n te r fo r G ro up D y n a m ics. O th e r un ive rsitie s cre ate d sim ilar o rg a n isatio n s an d g ov e rn m e n t a ge n cie s to o b ec am e inv o lv e d . D u ring th ese y e ars, the p sy ch o log ists w h o co n ce n tra ted o n m e tho d o log y w er e p rim a rily so cia l p syc h olo g ists a n d w ere in te reste d , fo r ex a m p le , in h o w b e st to m e asu re attitu de s. A bo u t th e tim e tha t B ad d e le y (1 9 79 ) d esc rib e d the la c k o f d irec t a pp lic a tio n o f m e m o ry re se arc h to su rv ey p rob le m s, sev e ra l U S g ov e rn m e nt g rou p s b e ga n fun d ing c ollab o rativ e rese a rc h b etw ee n co g nitiv e p syc h olo g ists a nd su rv e y m e tho d o log ists (se e Ja b in e e t a l., 1 9 8 4, fo r so m e of this ea rly w o rk). T h is w a s co u p le d w ith psy c h o lo g ists re c o gn ising ho w p sy ch o lo gy co u ld be a ide d b y jo in t v en ture s (L o ftu s, F ien b e rg & T a n ur, 1 9 85 ). T h e fie ld o f C o g n itiv e A sp e cts o f
Ó
1 9 9 8 P s y ch o lo g y P re s s L td
338
INTRODUCTION
S u rv e y M e tho d o log y , o r C A S M , w as bo rn . R e sea rch c o n tin ue d thro u g h th e 19 8 0 s an d is sum m a rised in se ve ra l b o o ks (e .g . T a nu r, 1 9 9 4) a n d re v ie w article s (e .g . Jo be & M in g a y , 1 99 1 ; Jo b e , T ou ra n ge a u & S m ith , 1 9 9 3 ). T h e C A S M rese a rc h e rs ha v e e x p lo re d a v a rie ty o f top ic s, fo r ex am p le, co n tex t a n d q ue stio n ord e r e ffe c ts, q u estio n w o rd in g , re sp on se alte rn ativ es, ad m in istra tio n m o d e s an d re tros pe c tiv e m em o ry e rrors. T h is spe cia l issu e fo c u ses on th e fin a l of th e se a n d sho w s ho w th is co lla b o ratio n o f c o m m e rc ia l an d g ov e rn m e nt ag e nc ie s w ith a ca d em ic rese a rc h e rs h a s flo u rish ed . T h e co n trib u tio n s fa ll in to th re e b roa d ca te g o rie s: th e struc ture of au to b io g rap h ica l m e m o ry an d re trie va l stra teg ie s, th e tem p or al e stim a tio n o f e ve n ts, a nd th e co lle c tiv e n a tu re o f im p orta nt ev e n ts. A ll of the se a re o f re lev a n ce to surv e y pra c tic e a n d e a ch , in turn , ha s h elp e d m em o ry re se arc he rs to d e v elo p th e orie s an d th e u nd e rsta n d in g of m em ory p ro ce sse s in ev e ryd a y life.
REFERENCES B a d d e le y , A .D . (1 9 7 9 ). T h e
lim i ta tio n s o f h u m a n m e m o ry : Im p lic a ti o n s fo r th e d es i g n
of
r et ro s p e c tiv e s u rv e y s . I n L . M o s s a n d H . G o ld s t ei n (E d s.), T h e r e c a l l m e th o d i n so c ia l s u rv e y s ( p p .1 3 ±3 0 ). L o n d o n : U n iv e rs ity o f L o n d o n In s ti tu te o f E d u c a tio n . Ja b in e , T ., S t ra f, M ., T a n u r, J.M ., & T o u ra n g e a u , R . (E d s .) (1 9 8 4 ). C o g n it iv e a s p e c ts o f s u r v e y m e t h o d o lo g y: B u il d i n g a b r id g e b e tw ee n d i sc i p l in e s . R e p o rt o f th e A d v a n c e d R e s e a rc h S e m in a r o n C o g n itiv e A s p e c ts o f S u rv e y M e th o d o l o g y . W a s h i n g to n D C : N a tio n a l A ca d e m y P re s s . Jo b e , J .B ., & M i n g a y , D .J. (1 9 9 1 ). C o g n it io n a n d s u rv e y m ea s u rem e n t: H i st o ry a n d o v e rv ie w . A p p li e d C o g n it iv e P s y c h o lo g y , 5 , 1 7 5 ±1 9 2 . Jo b e , J .B ., T o u ran g e a u , R ., &
S m i th , A .F . (1 9 9 3 ) . C o n t rib u ti o n s o f s u rv e y re s e ar ch to th e
u n d e rs ta n d i n g o f m e m o ry . A p p li ed C o g n itiv e P s yc h o lo g y, 7 , 5 6 7 ±5 8 4 . L ik e rt, R . (1 9 3 2 ). A te c h n i q u e fo r th e m e a s u re m en t o f at ti tu d e s . A r c h iv e s o f P s y c h o l o g y , 1 9 , 4 4 ±5 3 . L o ftu s, E .F ., F i e n b e rg , S .E ., & T an u r, J . (1 9 8 5 ) . C o g n it iv e p s y ch o lo g y m e e ts th e n a tio n al s u r v e y . A m e ri c a n P s y c h o lo g i st, 4 0 , 1 7 5 ±1 8 0 . M o ss , L ., & G o ld s te in , H . (E d s .) (1 9 7 9 ). T h e r ec a ll m e t h o d in s o c i a l s u r v e y s. L o n d o n : U n i v e rs it y o f L o n d o n In s t itu te o f E d u c a tio n . N ei s se r, U . (1 9 7 8 ). M e m o ry : W h a t a re th e im p o rt a n t q u e s ti o n s ? In M .M . G ru n e b e rg , P .E . M o rris a n d R .N . S y k es (E d s .), P r a c ti c a l a s p e c ts o f m e m o r y (p p .3 ±2 4 ). N e w Y o rk : A c a d e m ic P re s s. O ’ M u irc h e a rta ig h , C .A . (1 9 9 7 ). M e a s u re m en t e rro r i n s u rv e y s: A h i st o ri c al p e rs p e c tiv e . In L . L y b e rg , P . B ie m e r, M . C o llin s , E . D e L e e u w , C . D ip p o , N . S c h w a rz & D . T re w in (E d s .), S u r v e y m e a s u r e m e n t a n d p ro c e s s q u a li ty (p p .1 ±2 5 ). N ew Y o rk : W il e y . T a n u r, J .M . (E d .) (1 9 9 4 ) . Q u es t io n s a b o u t q u e s ti o n s : In q u ir ie s i n t o th e c o g n itiv e b a se s o f s u r v e y s. N e w Y o rk : R u s s e ll S a g e F o u n d a t io n . T h u rs to n e , L .L . (1 9 2 8 ). A t titu d e s c a n b e m e a s u re d . A m e r ic a n J o u r n a l o f S o c io lo g y , 3 3 , 5 2 9 ±5 4 4 . D A N IE L B . W R IG H T G E O R G E D . G A SK EL L
M E M O R Y , 1 9 9 8 , 6 (4 ), 3 3 9 ±3 6 6
S tr a te g ie s fo r E s tim a tin g B e h a v io u r a l F r e q u e n c y in S u r v e y I n te r v ie w s F re d e ric k G . C o nra d U S B u rea u of L a b or S tatistic s
N o rm a n R . B ro w n U niv ersity o f A lb erta , C an a d a
E rin R . C a s h m a n U n iv e rsity of Illin ois, U S A
W h e n p eo p le an sw e r s ur ve y qu e st io n s of th e f or m `` D u r in g the p as t m o nth , h o w m a ny tim e s d id yo u . . . ?’ ’ the ir r es po n se s p ro v id e v a lu a b le da ta f or re se a rc he r s a nd p o lic y m a k e r s . Y e t th e w a y r e s p o n d e n ts p r o d u c e th e ir a n s w e r s to th e s e ` ` b e h a v i o u r a l f r e q u e n c y q u e s t io n s ’ ’ is n o t w e ll u n d e r s to o d . T h is a r tic le de m o n st ra te s th at su rv e y re sp on d e nts c a n u s e a n ar ra y of d is tinc t es tim a tion st ra te g ie s, d e p en d in g o n w h at inf or m a tio n is a va ila ble in the ir m e m o ries . T h e k ind of e ve n t in f o rm a tio n tha t p e o ple u se is re la ted to f a ctor s s uc h as th e re g ula rity o f oc c u rre n c e, s im ila r ity o f o ne ep is o de to th e n e xt, a n d fr eq u e nc y . In a st u dy co n du c te d a s a te lep h on e su rv e y, re sp o n d e n ts ’ v er ba l re p or ts a nd re sp o ns e -tim e pa tte rn s in d ic a te th a t th ey us u a lly an sw e r be h a viou r al f re q ue n c y qu e st io n s by e ith e r r e tr ie v in g a n d c o u n tin g e p is o d e s , r e trie v in g o r e s tim a tin g r a te s o f oc c u rre n c e, or c o n v e rtin g a ge n er a l im p re ss io n of f re q u e n cy into a nu m e r ic a l qu a ntity . T h e th ird st ra teg y s ho u ld be o f p a rtic u la r c on c e rn to s ur ve y re se a rc h er s be c a u s e r e s p o n d e n ts p r o v ide a qu a n tita tiv e e s tim a te w ith o u t a n y r e le v a nt nu m e ric al k n ow le d g e . T h e s et of st ra teg ies a n d th e f a ctor s th a t in f lu en c e the ir us e a r e in te g ra te d in to a st atis tica l m od e l th at c ou ld h elp su rv e y p ra c titio ne rs to im p r ov e d ata q ua lity an d m em o r y re se a rc h er s to b ro a d en th eir pe rs p ec tiv e.
R e q u e s ts fo r re p rin ts sh o u l d b e s e n t to F re d e ri ck C o n ra d , B u re a u o f L a b o r S t a tisti c s, 2 M a s s a ch u se tt s A v e n u e N E , S u it e 4 9 1 5 , W as h in g t o n , D C 2 0 2 1 2 , U S A . E m a i l: C o n ra d _ F @ b ls .g o v W e a re g r at e fu l t o B ri a n H a rris -K o je t in , S te v e M il le r, a n d C ly d e T u c k e r fo r th e ir i n v a lu ab le s ta ti st ic a l a d v ic e . W e th a n k Ji m K e n n e d y , P a u l M u llin , S t a n le y P re ss e r, D a n W rig h t, a n d a n a n o n y m o u s re v ie w e r fo r d i sc u s s in g e a rli e r v e rs io n s o f th e m a n u s c rip t . W e a ls o th a n k D a v id C a n to r, J a m e s D o re e , M a rj F le m is te r, C l y d e T u c k e r, a n d J o n T ru sw e ll fo r lo g is tic a l a n d m e th o d o l o g ic al a s si st a n c e . T h e v ie w s e x p re s s e d h ere a re th o s e o f th e a u th o rs a lo n e an d d o n o t n e c e s sa ri ly re fle c t th e v i e w s o f t h e ir in s titu t io n s . T h is re s e a rc h w a s s u p p o rt e d i n p a rt b y an N S E R C o p e ra ti n g g ra n t a w a rd e d to th e se c o n d a u th o r.
Ó
1 9 9 8 P s y ch o lo g y P re s s L td
340
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
INTRODUCTION P eo p le e stim ate va rio u s fre qu e nc ie s on a n ev ery d ay b a sis. F o r e x am p le, w he n pe o ple se ek m ed ic al trea tm e n t, the y are ty pic ally ask e d to d e scrib e th e fr e q u e n c y o f th e ir s y m p to m s . W h e n th e y c o n si d e r m o v i n g t o a n e w ne ig hb o u rh oo d , the y m igh t asse ss h ow freq u en tly th ey h av e h e a rd a bo u t c rim e in th at a rea . W he n the y p urc h a se a n ew p ro du c t, o n e c o nsid e ratio n m ig h t be h o w ofte n th ey b eliev e th ey w ill u se the pro d u ct. T h is a rtic le co n ce rn s th e w a y p e o ple estim a te th e fre qu e nc y o f au to bio g ra p hi ca l ev e nt s w h en ask e d a bo u t the ir be h av io u r o n su rve y q ue stio n n aires . W e rep o rt th e re su lts o f a stu dy c o nd u c te d as a te le p ho ne su rv ey in w h ic h re sp on d e nts w e re tim ed a s th ey a n sw ere d qu e stio n s a bo u t the freq u e n cy o f the ir o w n b e ha v io ur. A fte r an sw er in g ea c h qu e stio n , th e y d esc ribe d h o w the y a rriv e d a t th e ir an sw er an d th en ra ted th e re g u la rity a nd sim ilarity o f th e ta rg et ev e n ts. S o -c alled b eh a vio u ral fre q u en c y q u estio ns a re u su ally o f th e fo rm ``D urin g th e la st m o n th h ow m a n y tim es d id y o u p a y to see a m o v ie ? ’ ’ w he re b o th th e tim e fra m e an d ev e nt c ate go ry ca n v ary . T h e resp o n se s to the se qu e stio n s h av e w id esp re a d p o litica l an d ec o n om ic im p lica tio n s, so the re is so c ia l va lu e in un d er sta n din g h o w th ey a re fo rm u la ted . F o r e xa m ple , th e m o nth ly u ne m p lo y m e n t ra tes re p o rte d b y the U S g o v ern m en t a re ba sed , in p art, o n re sp on se s to be h av io u ra l fre q u en c y q u e stio n s o n fed e ral su rve y s. In ad d itio n , the re are go o d m e th o d o lo g ica l re aso n s fo r stu d yin g p erfo rm a n ce on th is ta sk. It is a re lative ly fa m iliar ta sk fo r m o st p e o ple an d it is ca rrie d ou t in n atu ra listic setting s, w ith stim uli (a uto b io g ra ph ica l e ve n ts) th a t h av e p erso n a l m e an in g, y et an sw erin g be h av io u ra l fre q u en cy q u estio ns c an b e stu die d w ith so m e ex p e rim en tal c on tro l. T h ere a re rela tiv e ly d istinc t b od ies o f lite ra tu re o n h o w pe o ple an sw e r be h av io u ra l fre q u en cy q u estio ns in su rv ey situ a tio n s a n d h o w th e y e stim ate fre q u en c y in la b ora tory task s. S u rv ey m e th o d s rese arc h e rs (e .g . B la ir & B u rto n , 19 8 7 ; B u rto n & B lair, 1 9 9 1; M e an s & L oftu s, 1 9 9 1 ; M e n on , 1 99 3 ) h a ve fo cu se d th e ir stud ie s o n th e u se o f tw o re sp o nse stra teg ie s: ep iso d e en u m e ra tio n (c o u n tin g a ll retrie v ed insta nc e s of th e e v en t ca te g o ry w ith in the sp ec ifie d tim e pe rio d ) an d ra te-b a sed in fe re n c es (rec alling tha t th e b eh a v io u r ha p pe n s o n c e a w e e k an d rea so n in g tha t it m u st, the refo re , h av e o cc u rred fo ur tim e s in th e la st m o n th ). C e rta in c o nd itio n s p ro m o te th e use o f o n e stra teg y ov e r a n o th e r a n d th e se h a ve b ee n m a nip u la ted ex p e rim en tally (e .g . B lair & B u rto n , 1 98 7 ). T h is is esse n tia lly , a d ua l-stra te g y vie w in w h ic h re sp o nse s a re b ase d o n e ith e r c o un ts o f re triev e d e piso d es (en u m era tio n ) o r re trie v ed rates o f o c cu rre nc e . In this article w e p rese n t e vid e nc e th at p eo p le u se a d ditio n a l strate gie s for a nsw e rin g the se qu e stio n s b u t th e im po rta nt p oin t is th a t su rv ey re sp on d en ts a re a ssu m e d to b e ca p ab le o f u sin g m u ltip le strate gie s. In co n trast, in div id ua l la b ora to ry stud ies h a v e ten d ed to fo c u s on th e use o f in d iv id u al stra teg ies. F o r e x am p le, T v ersk y a n d K ah n e m a n (1 9 73 ) d em o nstrate d th a t p e op le u se th e e a se o f re trie vin g in stan c es a s a k ey to fre qu e nc y Ð th e
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
341
av a ila b ility h e uristic . H in tz m a n (19 8 8 ) m o de lled freq u en c y ju d ge m e n ts as a co m pa riso n o f a targ et item ’ s sim ila rity to ex e m p lars in m em ory Ð a sim ila rity p rin cip le. B arsa lo u a nd R o ss (1 9 8 6) pro v id ed e v id e n ce th at sub jec ts re trie ve an d co u n t ca te g or y in stan c es w h e n re p ortin g c ate go ry freq u e nc y Ð a n e nu m era tio n stra teg y . A lth o u gh m a n y m em ory rese arc h e rs h av e n o ted th a t su b je cts m a y estim a te fre qu e n cy in m o re th an o n e w a y (B e g g, M ax w e ll, M itte re r, & H a rris, 1 98 6 ; B ruc e , H o c kle y , & C ra ik , 1 99 1 ; H intz m a n , 1 9 7 6 ; H ow e ll, 1 9 73 ; Jo h n so n, R ay e, W a n g , & T ay lo r, 1 97 9 ; Jo n id e s & Jon e s, 19 9 2 ; Jon id es & N a ve h B en jam in, 19 8 7 ; V o ss, V e re b , & B isan z , 1 9 7 5), th e d a ta from la b o ra tory stu die s p oin t p rim a rily to th e u se o f ind iv id u a l strate gie s. In a se rie s o f lab o ra to ry stud ies th a t a re in m a n y w a y s an a lo g o us to the c urre nt su rv ey -fo rm a t stu d y, B ro w n (1 99 5 ) illu stra te d th a t in d iv id ua l su b je cts u se d m u ltip le stra te g ie s to asse ss the fre q u en c y o f ite m s tha t th ey h ad rec e ntly stu d ie d . H e u sed a co m b in atio n o f ve rb a l p ro to c o ls a n d resp on se tim e s to d iffe re n tia te th e stra teg ie s. In th e cu rren t article , w e pre sen t a stu d y o f h o w re sp o n d en ts a nsw e r b eh a vio ur al fre qu e nc y q u estio ns w h ic h is in ten d e d to in te g rate a nd e x te n d fin d ing s fro m the se tw o b o d ie s o f lite ratu re. W e id en tify a ra ng e o f strateg ie s tha t d iffer in th eir co n d itio n s o f use a s w ell as in th eir u nd e rlyin g pro c esse s, an d w e su g g est tha t resp o nd e n ts use w h ic h e ve r stra teg y is b e st serv ed b y th e av a ila b le info rm a tio n .
THE MULTIPLE STRATEGY PERSPECTIVE O ur ce n tral id e a is tha t p e o ple estim ate fre q u en cy b ase d o n th e c o nte nts o f th eir m e m o ry o r, in the a bse n ce o f re le v an t c on te nt, th e sta te o f th eir m e m o ry . In o rd e r to c o u nt e piso d es, th ey m u st b e ab le to retriev e ep iso de s; in o rd er to infe r freq u en c y b ase d o n ty p ic a l rate o f o c cu rren c e th e y m u st be ab le to retrie v e rate info rm a tio n . W h e n the y c an n ot retriev e this ty p e o f info rm a tio n , the y m a y b e ab le to u se q ua lita tiv e im p re ssio n s o f fre q ue n c y, su c h as ``th a t h a pp e ne d a lo t’ ’ , co n v ertin g the im p re ssio n into a n um e ric al e stim a te. W h en no n e o f th is info rm a tio n is dire ctly av a ila ble , p e op le ca n ev a lua te th e sta te o f the ir m e m o ry to d eriv e freq u en c y in fo rm ation . W e term th is m e m ory asse ssm en t. T h e av a ila b ility h eu ristic (T v e rsk y & K a hn e m an , 1 9 7 3) is a g oo d e xa m p le : T h e m ore d ifficu lt it is to re triev e in sta n c es, the les s freq u en t th ey a re assu m ed to b e. In p rin cip le, o ne c an a lm o st a lw a y s a ssess th e sta te o f o n e’ s m e m o ry, re ga rd le ss o f w h eth e r e pi so de s, rate s, o r o th e r rele v a n t in fo rm atio n c an b e re trie v ed . C on se qu e n tly , w e vie w m em o ry a sse ssm e nt strate g ie s as d e fa u lt p ro ce du re s. T h is v ie w im p lie s th at if o n e co u ld k n o w th e v a lu e o f c ertain v a ria b le s, on e co u ld at le ast ru le o u t the u se o f ce rta in strate gie s. F o r e x am ple , in o rd er to en u m e ra te ep iso de s, on e ne e ds to be a ble to d istin gu ish on e rem em be re d e p isod e from the n e xt. R em em be re d ep iso de s w ill b e rela tiv e ly d istin g u ish a ble if the y o cc u r o n a n irre g ula r sc he d u le an d d o n o t h av e sim ilar c ha rac teristic s. If o n e ca n
342
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
de te rm ine ju st h o w d istin ctiv e o n e e piso de is from a n oth e r, it w o uld b e p o ssible to d e te rm in e w h e the r a n e n um era tion strate g y is fe asib le . W e disc u ss ce rtain va ria b les th at h av e be e n a sso cia te d w ith ev e nt d istin ctive n e ss la ter. F ro m a p rac tic al v iew p o int, th is m ea n s su rve y rese a rch ers m ay b e ab le to de te rm ine w h a t strateg ie s re sp on d en ts are c ap a b le o f usin g a n d to ru le o u t oth e rs b e ca use the n e ce ssa ry in fo rm a tion is la ck ing . T his m a y b e u se fu l, fo r ex a m p le, in ev a lu a tin g re spo n se a c cu ra cy . A n e n um era tion stra teg y is m o re lik ely to lea d to u nd e rrep o rtin g th a n o v erre po rting b ec au se p eo p le a re m o re lik ely to forg e t ind iv idu a l ep iso d es th a n to re c all e piso d e s th at eithe r did n o t ha p pe n or oc c ur re d o u tsid e th e relev a n t tim e inte rva l (S u d m a n & B ra d b urn , 19 7 4 ). A m eth od o lo gic al in te rv en tion th at in cre ase s re po rted fre qu e nc y c an b e assu m ed to b e inc rea sin g resp o n se ac cu ra c y if on e c an b e su re resp o n de n ts are e n um era tin g . H ow e v er, if the e p isod e s a bo u t w h ic h th ey are q ue stio ne d are n ot d istin c tiv e, the n en u m era tio n is un like ly an d the a ssum p tio n s ab o u t ac cu ra c y m a y n ee d to be qu e stio n ed . (N o te, th at w e d o no t ad d ress re spo n se ac cu ra c y in th is article b u t c o nc e ntra te in stea d o n th e p ro ce sse s th at un d e rlie fre q u en c y e stim ate s.) A ltho u g h th e m ultip le strate gy v iew le a ds to c le a r p red ic tio n s a b ou t w he n ce rta in strate g ie s w ill n o t b e u se d , it is le ss d e cisive a bo u t w h en a p a rtic u la r stra teg y w ill be u se d. T h is is b ec au se m o re th a n o ne k in d o f rele va n t in fo rm a tio n m a y b e a v aila ble . F or insta n ce , a film e nth u sia st m igh t k no w tha t he o r sh e go e s to th e m o v ie s tw ice a w e e k (rate in fo rm a tio n) an d m ig h t also be a b le to re c all th e n am e s an d p lo ts o f the last se v era l m o vie s a tten d e d (e p iso d e in fo rm a tio n ); e ith er so u rce of in fo rm a tion co u ld b e su fficie nt fo r a n estim a te, so th e issu e is w h ich sou rc e resp o n de n ts w ill use . F o rtu n ate ly , the re are a n u m b e r o f fac tors kn o w n to affe ct stra te g y ch o ice a n d th e w a y the se fa c to rs ten d to c o m b in e m a k es o ne stra teg y m o re lik e ly to b e u sed tha n an o the r. L a te r in th e article , w e re po rt a statistic a l an aly sis in w h ic h w e ex a m in ed th e c om b ine d e ffec t o f se ve ral va riab le s o n the u se o f p a rtic ula r stra teg ies.
Factors That Affect Strategy Use S ev er al fa cto rs a re k n ow n to a ffec t strate gy u se. B lair a nd B urto n (1 98 7 ) a n d B u rto n a nd B la ir (1 9 9 1) p o in t to the im po rta nc e o f ac tu al fre q u en c y in pre d ic ting stra te g y u se . T h e y fou n d th a t ep iso de s ten d to b e e nu m era ted w h e n fre q u en c y is low ; th at is, w he n th ere a re re lativ e ly few e p iso d e s to rec a llÐ ra te in form atio n te nd s to b e use d w h e n fre q ue n cy is hig h er. F re qu e n cy w a s m a n ip u l ate d b y e lic itin g ju d g e m en ts fo r e ith e r o n e -m o n th o r six -m o n th re fe ren c e p erio ds, th e id e a b e in g th a t fre q ue n c y is gre ate r fo r lo n g e r tim e pe rio d s. T h ey also fo u nd th a t th e tim e allo ca te d to re sp o nd affe cts stra te g y sele ction : m o re tim e le d to m o re ep iso de en u m e ratio n. F in ally , q u e stio n w o rd in g h ad a w ea k effec t o n re sp on se stra teg y : ``H o w ofte n . . . ? ’ ’ p ro d uc e d
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
343
m o re re sp o nse s e xp re ssed a s rate s th a n ``H o w m a n y tim e s . . . ?’ ’ . In th eir d isc u ssion , th e a u th o rs sp ec u la te th at the re gu lar ity an d distin c tiv e ne ss o f ev e n ts m a y a ffe ct strateg y a s w ell (B la ir & B u rto n , 1 9 8 7, p .2 8 7 ; B u rton & B la ir, 1 99 1 , p p .6 4±6 5 ). T h e reg u la rity w ith w h ic h e ve n ts oc c ur h a s sub se q u en tly b e en sh o w n to affe ct h ow resp o n d en ts p ro d uc e b e ha v io ura l freq u e n cies. M e a n s a n d L o ftu s (19 9 1 ) fo u n d th at ac tiv itie s th a t p resu m ab ly o c cu r irre g ula rly , like v isitin g th e d oc tor for a n inju ry, led to freq u en c y jud g e m e nts b a sed o n re ca lle d inc ide n ts m o re th an d id a ctivities lik e v isiting th e a lle rg ist, w hic h p resu m a b ly o cc u r o n a reg u la r sch e d ule . T h e y a lso sh o w e d th a t sim ilar e piso d es (m in o r m ed ica l co n d itio n s) w e re rec a lle d le ss o ften th an d istin c tiv e on es (se rio u s m ed ica l co n d itio n s), altho u g h th ey d id n o t sh o w th at su ch ac tivitie s led resp o nd e n ts to u se rate k n o w le d g e in ste ad o f e n um era ting ep iso de s. T h ey d id n ot m e asu re ev e n t re gu lar ity o r d istin ctive n e ss, an d d id n o t lo ok a t b o th v a ria ble s to g e th e r. M e n o n (1 99 3 ) h a s sy stem a tic ally e xp lo re d th e e ffec ts o f e v en t re g ula rity an d sim ila rity o n strate g y ch o ice . In a series o f stu d ie s, she fo u n d tha t e ve n ts w ere p rim a rily en u m e ra te d w h en e v en t in sta n ce s o c cu rred o n a n irre g ula r b asis a nd w h e n su b jec ts co n sid e red th em to b e d istin c tiv e (lo w in ra te d sim ila rity ). O th er lev e ls of th ese ev e n t c h ara c te ristic s le d to in cre ase d use o f rate kn o w led g e. M e n on ’ s p e rs pe c tiv e d iffers from o ur o w n in tha t she a do p ts a st ri c t d u a l st ra te g y v ie w Ð re s p o n d e n ts e i th e r e n u m e ra te o r u s e ra te info rm a tio n , b u t th ere is n o ro le fo r no n -nu m eric al stra teg ie s su c h a s th o se tha t in v olv e g en e ral im p ressio n s o r m em o ry a ssessm en t. H o w e v e r, lik e M en o n (19 9 3 ), w e giv e co n sid e rab le w eig ht to th e ro le of re gu lar ity an d sim ila rity in stra teg y ch o ice .
Predictions T h e m u ltiple stra te g y p ersp e ctiv e lea d s to se v era l p red ictio ns. First, th e reg u la rity w ith w h ich insta nc e s of an ev e nt o cc u r w ill be rela te d to th e u se o f rate -b a se d strate g ie s a n d (in d ire ctly) to th e u se o f e n um era tio n -ba se d stra teg ies. W e assu m e th a t p eo p le a re lik ely to a c qu ire ra te in fo rm a tio n w h e n e ve n ts o cc u r o n a rela tiv ely reg u la r sc he d u le . If so m e o ne p erfo rm s a ce rta in ac tiv ity e ve ry T h u rsd ay fro m 2 :00 to 3:3 0 , it is lik ely the p erso n w ou ld b ec om e aw a re o f th is. In c o ntras t, it is u nlike ly so m eo n e w o u ld ha v e w e ek ly ra te info rm a tio n av a ila ble for an e v en t th at m ay oc c ur sev e ra l tim e s in o ne w e ek , a nd th e n n ot a g ain fo r sev e ral w ee k s. W e pre dic t, the refo re, tha t strateg ies b a sed o n rate in fo rm a tio n w ill b e u se d m o re ofte n fo r re gu larly o cc u rrin g tha n fo r irreg u la rly o cc u rrin g ev e n ts. S ec o nd , reg u la rity sh ou ld red u c e th e a cc e ssib ility of e v en t insta nc es. T his is b ec au se a re gu la rly o c cu rring ev e nt h a s id en tic al te m p o ra l ch a ra c teristic s e ac h tim e it ta ke s p la c e, so p eo p le m ay p oo rly e n co d e th e se p ara te e piso d es. In o the r w ord s, all e lse b ein g eq u a l, insta nc e s o f reg u la rly o cc urrin g ev e nts sh o u ld b e
344
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
m o re sim ila r to on e a no th er th an in stan c es o f irreg u larly oc c ur rin g e ve n ts. In tu rn , th is im plies th a t insta nc e s o f re g ula rly oc c urrin g ev e nts sh ou ld b e m o re difficu lt to re trie ve th a n in sta n c es o f irre g u larly o cc u rrin g ev e nts, a n d h en c e le ss lik ely to e v o ke en u m e ra tion . T hu s, th ere a re tw o rea so ns for p red ictin g th a t rate ba se d re sp o nse s w ill be m o re co m m o n fo r reg u la rly oc c urring e v en ts: su c h ev e nts p ro m o te th e e n co d in g o f rate in fo rm a tio n a nd the d e co n te x tua lisa tio n o f in d iv id u al e ve n ts. A n u m b er o f a u to b io g ra ph ica l m e m o ry stu d ie s (e .g . B a rclay & W e llm an , 19 8 6 ; B re w e r, 1 9 8 8 ; L in to n , 1 9 82 ; N e isse r, 19 8 6 ; W a g e na a r, 1 9 8 6) h av e de m on strate d th a t ev e n ts ju d g ed to b e sim ila r to m a ny o th ers a re ha rd to re c all an d re co g nise . H ig h ly sim ila r ep iso de s le ad p e o ple to re p rese n t co m m o n fe a tu re s of tho se e p isod e s, b ut n ot fe a tu re s th a t d istin gu ish o n e fro m the n ex t (N e iss er , 1 9 8 1 ; S t ru b e , 1 9 8 7 ). T h e re fo r e, o u r s e co n d p re d ic tio n is th a t en u m e ratio n sho u ld b e ra re w he n in sta n ce s o f a targ e t ac tiv ity c los ely rese m b le on e a n o th e r, an d sh o uld be u se d m ore often as the ep isod e s b e co m e m o re distinc tiv e an d h en c e a re e asie r to re triev e. O u r th ird p red iction co n ce rn s th e tim e s to a nsw e r a fre q ue n c y q ue stio n . In th e cu rren t stud y , re sp on se tim es a re u se d as a m e an s o f co rro bo ra tin g th e sub je cts’ re tro sp e ctive stra teg y re p orts. W e assu m e tha t it ta ke s a fix e d am o un t o f tim e to re triev e on e ep isod e , so th at th e m o re e piso d es re triev e d th e lo n ge r th e re sp on se tim e (B ou sfield , S ed g e w ic k , & C o h e n , 19 5 4 ; B row n , 19 9 5 ). In co n tra st, w e assu m e th a t p eo p le asso c iate rate k n o w le d ge w ith pa rtic u lar ev e nt ca teg o rie s a n d (a s a re su lt) it is direc tly retriev a b le . It sho u ld ta k e no m o re tim e to re triev e a rate o f o nc e a d ay th an o f o n c e a m o nth , all else be ing e q ua l. O u r th ird pre d ic tio n , th ere fo re , is tha t resp o n se tim e s sho u ld in c re a se w ith estim a ted fre qu e nc y w h en re sp on d e nts e n um e ra te ep isod e s, b u t th e re sh ou ld b e n o re la tion be tw ee n re sp on se tim e a n d e stim ated freq u en c y w h e n th ey use a ra te. S im ilarly , th ere is no re a so n, a p rio ri, w h y re spo n se tim e s s h o u ld b e re l a te d to e st im a te d fr e q u e n c y w h e n re s p o n d e n ts u s e he u ristic s lik e a va ila b ility. In su m m a ry , w e a re pre d ic tin g th a t e nu m era tio n w ill b e rela tiv e ly co m m o n w h e n e v en t in stan c es are distin c tiv e a n d o cc u r a t irre g u la r in te rv als, a nd tha t ra te-b a sed resp on se s w ill b e p re v ale n t w h en th e e ve n ts o c cu r a t re g ula r in terv a ls. W e are also p re dic tin g th at re spo n se tim e s w ill in cre a se w ith re po rted freq u en c y w h e n pe o ple en u m era te , a n d th at the y w ill no t w h e n pe o ple rely on ra te -ba se d stra teg ies. N ote tha t, a lth o ug h w e a ssum e th a t re sp on d en ts h a ve m ultiple stra teg ies a v aila ble to th em , w e h a v e fo c use d o ur p re dic tio n s o n en u m e ra tio n an d ra te-b a sed stra teg ies. T h e re is little em p iric al ev id en c e ab o u t w h a t o th e r stra teg ies re sp on d en ts m ig ht u se to a n sw er freq u en c y qu e stio n s on su rv e y s. In lig ht o f th is, o u r stu dy h a s a n ex p lora to ry ch a ra c ter to it a s w ell. W e de sign e d th e stu d y to id e n tify the se a dd itio n al strate gie s a nd to e x am ine w h ic h fac to rs (a m o n g sim ilarity , reg u la rity , re p orte d fre q ue n cy , an d resp o n se tim e ) are rela te d to the ir use .
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
345
METHOD Design T h e stud y w a s co n d uc te d a s a tele ph o n e surv e y. T h re e ex p erie nc e d in terv iew e rs ask e d 1 0 6 re sp on d en ts to estim a te th e fre qu e nc y of 10 a uto b io g rap h ica l e ve n ts 1 an d to ra te th e re gu lar ity an d sim ila rity o f th o se ev en ts. T he resp o n d en ts w ere co n tac ted fro m a sam ple o f 2 5 0 telep h o ne n u m b e rs. T h e se n u m be rs w ere ran d o m ly d raw n from a na tio n a lly re pr ese n ta tiv e sa m p le , ba sed o n ru ral an d m e tro p o lita n are as o f the U n ite d S ta tes a n d stra tified b y C en su s reg io n an d p op u latio n. If p ote ntial re spo n d en ts d e cline d to p a rtic ipa te, in terv ie w e rs d id n o t attem p t to p e rsu a d e the m to ta ke pa rt. E a ch in terv ie w w as a u dio ta p e d w ith th e resp o n d en t’ s c o nse n t.
Procedure T h e resp o nd e nt s w e re p re se n te d w ith fo u r ta sk s. F irst th e y w e re a sk ed to a nsw e r 1 0 b eh a vio u ral fre q ue n cy qu e stio n s (se e T a b le 1). T he y w e re to ld to thin k sile n tly b efo re an sw er in g , a n d to tak e a s m u c h tim e a s th ey n ee d e d, b u t to resp o n d as soo n a s the y h ad m ad e u p th e ir m ind . S ec o nd , a fte r an sw e rin g e ac h q ue stio n , th e re spo n d en ts w ere ask ed to ex p la in h o w th e y c a m e u p w ith th e an sw e r; th a t is, th ey w e re a ske d fo r a retros pe c tiv e p roto co l (E ric sso n & S im o n, 2 1 99 3 ). T h e inte rv iew e rs o cc a sio n a lly p rob e d if the y felt th e p ro to co l w as n o t info rm a tiv e . In th e th ird task , th e inte rv ie w ers p re sen ted th e 1 0 ev e nts in the T a ble 1 q ue stio n s an d ask e d re spo n d e nts to rate th e re g ula rity of ea ch o n a 4 -p o int sca le. R esp o nd e n ts w e re to ld th at if th ey e n g ag e d in a n e v en t o n a rou tine sch e d ule it w as V ery R e g ula r (4); if th ey n ev e r en g ag e d in it o n a ro utin e sc he d u le it w a s V e ry Irre gu la r (1 ). T h e in term ed iate re sp on se o p tio n s w e re S o m e w h at R e gu la r (3) a n d So m e w ha t Irreg u la r (2). T h e resp o nd e nt s w e re ex p lic itly instru cte d n o t to c o nfu se (in )fre qu e n t ev en ts w ith (ir)reg u la r e v en ts. T h e fo u rth ta sk req u ire d resp o n d en ts to ju dg e th e sim ilarity o f th e ev e nts o n a 4 -po in t sc ale. T h e y w ere told th at if th eir e x pe rien c es w e re v irtu a lly th e sam e ea c h tim e th e y e ng a ge d in a b eh a vio ur th e n th e y sh ou ld rate it V ery S im ila r (4); if e ac h en c ou n ter w ith th e ev e n t se em ed lik e a to tally u n iq u e e x pe rie n c e, th en it sho u ld re ce iv e a V e ry D iffere n t (1 ) ra tin g . F o r sim ila rity ra tin g s be tw e e n th ese ex trem e v a lu e s resp o n d en ts w e re g ive n th e o p tio n o f So m e w ha t S im ila r (3 ) an d So m e w ha t 1
T h e e v e n t c a te g o rie s w e re c h o s e n to v a ry in t h e s im il ari ty a n d re g u l a rity o f th e ir in d i v i d u a l
in s ta n c e s o n in tu itiv e g ro u n d s ; h o w e v er, t h i s w a s n o t s y s te m a tic a lly c o n tro ll e d o r e v a lu a te d , a n d is n o t d is c u s s e d fu rt h e r. 2
W e c o ll e c te d ret ro sp e c tiv e a s o p p o s e d to c o n c u rre n t p ro t o c o ls in o rd er to o b t a in s tra te g y rep o rts
th a t d i d n o t a ffe c t th e tim e o f th e re sp o n s e i n th e firs t ta s k . A lth o u g h re tro sp e c tiv e p ro to co ls ca n b e a le s s d ire c t m e a s u re o f m e n t a l p ro c e s s , t h e y d o n o t in te rfe re w it h th e p ri m ar y ta s k a s c o n c u rr en t t h i n k a lo u d m et h o d s c a n (S c h o o le r, O h l s so n , & B ro o k s, 1 9 9 3 ).
346
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN TABLE 1 Stimulus Questions D u r in g th e la s t m o n t h , h o w m a n y ti m e s d id y o u . . . 1 . c o n d u c t a tra n s a c tio n w it h a n A u to m a te d T e lle r M a c h in e ? 2 . p e rf o rm a tra n sa c t io n w ith a te ll e r i n a b a n k ? 3 . s h o p i n a g ro c e ry st o re ? 4 . s h o p i n a d e p a rt m e n t s to re ? 5 . p u rc h a se g a s fo r y o u r ca r? 6 . p a y to h a v e y o u r ca r re p a ire d ? 7 . re c e iv e s u b s c rip ti o n m a g a z in e s b y m a il ? 8 . re c e iv e c a ta lo g u e s b y m a il? 9 . e a t ic e c re a m ? 1 0 . e a t s p i c y fo o d ?
D iffe re n t (2 ). W e se ttle d o n th e n u m b e r o f p o ints an d th e p a rticu la r v erb a l lab e ls fo r b o th th e re gu larity a n d sim ila rity sca le s a fte r p ilot testin g th e ratin g ta sk s. T h is ap p ro ac h to assig nin g sim ila rity a n d reg u la rity ra tin g s to stim ulu s e ve n ts diffe rs fro m o th ers in th e litera ture . In pa rtic u lar, M e n on (1 9 93 ) c ollec ted ra tin g s fro m in d e pe n d en t ju d g es a n d e stab lishe d a se t of stim u li th at w ere rate d e ith e r hig h o n b oth re gu lar ity a nd sim ila rity, lo w o n b oth , o r h ig h o n on e a nd lo w o n th e o the r. A pa rtic u la r e ve n t w as th e n co n side re d fix e d in th ese ch a ra c te ristic s fo r all resp o n de n ts. T h is w as e ffec tive u n de r M e no n ’ s a p pro a ch in p a rt be c au se he r stim u lu s e v en ts w e re relativ ely fin e-g rain e d (e.g . sn a ck in g, w a sh in g o n e ’ s ha ir) a n d h e r su b jec ts w e re o f re lative ly u n iform d e m o g rap h ics (u n de rgr ad u ate stu d e n ts ). O u r sti m u lu s e v e n t s w e r e so m e w h a t m o re c o m p lic a t e d ( e .g . pe rfo rm ing a tra n sac tio n w ith a te lle r in a ba n k ), a n d o ur re sp o n de n ts m o re div e rse de m o g ra ph ica lly (a stra tified , na tio n a l sa m p le ). T h is m ea n s th at in o u r sam p le , tw o d iffere n t re spo n d en ts m ig ht e xp e rien ce e ve n ts q u ite d iffe re n tly . C o n side r a so c ial sec u rity rec ipie n t w h o de p o sits h er c h eq u e at the b an k ea c h m o n th w h e n it arrive s an d inte rac ts w ith th e sa m e teller e a ch tim e . T h is e v en t w o u ld b e q uite reg u lar a n d sim ilar. In c on trast, a bu sy p ro fe ssio n a l w h os e sa la ry is direc tly d ep o sited a nd w h o se tran sa ctio n s a re prim a rily w ith a n au tom a te d te lle r m a ch in e, w o uld b e lik e ly to in tera ct w ith a h um an te ller irreg u larly (a lth o u g h e ac h inte rac tio n m ay be sim ilar to th e n ex t). U n d e r o ur ap p ro a c h, a n ev e nt’ s re gu lar ity an d sim ila rity w e re ba sed o n w ith in -su b jec t ju d g em e nts. T h is m e a nt th a t on e re sp on d e nt co u ld jud g e a n e ve n t to b e V ery R eg u la r an d a n o th e r re sp o n de n t c o uld ra te th e sam e e v en t V e ry Irre g u la r, a n d sub se q ue n t a n aly ses co u ld ta ke into a cc o un t su ch ind ivid u a l d iffere nc e s. F o r th is rea so n, av e rag e re g u la rity a nd sim ilarity ra tin g s a re n o t pa rtic u la rly im p o rtan t in o ur a n aly ses. T h ree d iffe ren t ra nd o m ord e rs o f th e ev e nts w e re g en era ted fo r ea c h re sp o n de n t, on e fo r e lic itin g th e fre q u en c y rep o rts a nd retro spe c tiv e p roto c o ls, on e fo r th e re g ula rity ra tin g ta sk , an d on e fo r th e sim ila rity ra tin g ta sk. A sing le
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
347
refe ren c e p e rio d o f o ne m o n th w a s u se d for the fre q u en c y q u estio n s. O u r p ilo t stud y ind ica ted tha t re sp on d e nts fo u nd it d isru p tiv e to sh ift refe ren c e p e rio d s b etw ee n q ue stio n s a nd tha t ze ro re sp on se s w ere rela tiv e in freq u en t ac ro ss th e ev e n ts fo r th is tim e fram e . R e spo n se C o d in g. T h e au th ors liste n e d to a su b set o f tap e d in terv ie w s an d d ev e lo p ed a p re lim in a ry tax o n om y fo r the re sp on se strate gie s th at w e re ev id en t in th e p roto co ls. T w o g ro up s of tw o c o de rs th en classified th e c om p le te se t o f p ro to co ls, rea ch in g e ac h co d in g de c isio n b y c on se n su s w ith in a g ro u p , an d ex p a nd in g the c o din g tax o n o m y a s n e ed e d . B e ca u se th e g ro up s co n siste n tly d isa g re e d o n h o w to c od e o n e ev e n t (rec eiv in g su bsc ription m a g az ine s) it w a s elim in a te d from fu rth e r a n aly sis. In a first p ass at co d in g th e p roto co ls, th e in te rg ro u p relia bility fo r the n in e re m a inin g ite m s w as .7 5 . A ll disc rep a nc ie s w ere the n reso lve d thro u g h disc ussio n be tw ee n th e g ro u p s so th a t sub se q ue n t an a ly se s w ere ba se d o n co m p le te ag re em en t. T he fin a l se t o f stra teg ies is p re se nte d in T a b le 2 . R e spo n se T im es. T h e d ura tio n o f e ac h tap e d resp o n se w as m e asu re d from co m ple tio n o f the q u e stio n b y th e in te rv ie w er to in itiatio n o f th e sp o ke n fre qu e n c y by th e re sp o n d e n t. R e sp on se tim e s in c lu d e d th e d u ratio n s o f ex tran e o us sp ee c h p rio r to th e ac tu al fre qu e n cy , fo r e xa m p le , q u a lifiers suc h as ``I’ d sa y a bo u t . . .’ ’ a n d v erb a lisa tio n s of resp o n de n ts’ th in k ing , su c h a s ``W ell I do it tw ic e a w e e k, so . . .’ ’ . T h e d u ratio n s w e re m ea su red b y bo th g ro u p s of c od e rs. A s th e ir m e a sure m e n ts w e re h igh ly c o rrelate d (r = .9 7, P < .0 1, n = 9 50 ), o nly o n e se t of tim e s w a s fu rth e r a n aly sed . A bo u t 9 % o f the se
TABLE 2 Major Response Categories and Percentage of Observations R e s p o n s e S t ra te g y
P e r c e n t a g e o f O b s e rv a tio n s
N o n -ze r o R e s p o n se s 1 . E p is o d e E n u m e ra tio n
27
2 . R a te R e trie v a l
15
3 . R a te E s tim a t io n
12
4 . R a te an d A d ju s tm e n t 5 . G e n e ra l Im p re s s io n 6 . U n c o d a b le
9 18 18 n = 6 60
Z er o R e s p o n s e s 7 . A t te m p te d E n u m era ti o n
15
8 . R a te R e trie v a l
80
9 . U n c o d a b le
5 n = 2 65
348
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
ob se rv ation s w e re ex c lud e d b ec au se re spo n d en ts a sk ed fo r c la rific a tio n o r w e re disru p te d b efo re resp o n d in g .
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION T h e o v era ll resp o n se ra te w a s 42 % w h ich is so m ew h at lo w fo r m o st su rv ey s. H o w e ve r, th e re sea rch p ro c ed u re c o uld ha v e b ee n at le a st p artially re sp on sib le : 14 % o f th os e co n ta cted w ere w illin g to b e in te rv iew e d b u t n o t w illin g to be tap e 3 re c o rde d . It is p o ssib le tha t so m e o f th o se p eo p le w h o w e re co n tac ted b u t de c lin e d to p articip ate co u ld ha v e b e en p e rsua d ed to tak e pa rt; h o w ev e r, to re d u ce in terv iew tim e a nd asso c iated co st, the in terv ie w e rs w ere in stru c te d n o t to e ng a ge in suc h ``c o n ve rsio n ’ ’ ac tiv itie s.
Response Strategies R e sp o nse stra te g ie s w e re classifie d se p ara tely fo r freq u en c y rep o rts o f ze ro (2 6 % ) an d a ll o th er v a lu e s (7 4% ). L o o k in g first a t th e n on -z e ro re sp on se s, 1 8 % of th e p ro to co ls w e re u n co d a b le . A to tal o f 9 6 % o f th e re m a in in g d ata w a s assig n ed to on e o f fiv e resp o n se stra teg y ca teg o ries: e piso d e e n u m e ration , rate re triev a l, ra te estim a tio n , rate a nd ad ju stm e nt, g e ne ral im p re ssio n . T o a ce rtain ex te nt, a ll b ut ep iso de en u m e ra tio n re ly o n in fo rm atio n a b ou t th e g e ne ra l e v en t ca teg o ry, rath er th a n in d iv id u al e piso d e s, a nd so m ig h t b e re d u ce d to a sing le ra te strate g yÐ a nd this is w h a t is ty p ic a lly d on e (e .g . B u rto n & B la ir, 19 9 1 ; H u b b a rd , 1 9 92 ). H o w e v e r, th e p roto co ls sug g e ste d th at th e u n de rly in g p ro ce sse s w e re differe nt, so th e five d istinc tio n s w e re m a in ta in e d . T h e re m a in in g 4 % o f th e c o da b le p ro to co ls w e re a ssig n ed to the c a te g ory o f ite m e nu m era tio n (in pa rtic u lar, listin g th e c a ta lo gu e s ty pic ally rec e ive d in a n sw e ring th e c ata log u e qu e stio n ). T h ese are n o t co n sid ere d furth er be c au se th ey w e re rare a nd div erg e d fro m th e p he n o m e n on o f in te re st in th a t resp o nd e nt s w e re no t co n c ern e d w ith ev e nts b u t ra th e r w ith ite m s. B a sed on re p or ts in th e litera ture , w e ex p ec ted e v id e n ce in th e pro toc o ls o f bo th e piso d e e nu m era tio n a n d o f so m e k ind o f rate strate gie s, an d b o th w e re ob se rv ed : 2 7% o f th e p ro to c o ls w ere co d e d as ep isod e e nu m era tio n a nd 3 6 % w e re co d ed a s so m e ty p e o f ra te -b ase d stra teg y . A n ex a m p le o f a n e p iso d e en u m e ratio n p ro to co l, in re sp on se to th e qu e stio n a b ou t g a s p u rc h ase s, is ``T h ree . T o d ay a n d . . . a b ou t ten d a ys ag o o n a job . . . an d o n e oth e r tim e w h e n I w a s pra ctica lly e m p ty .’ ’ W e su b div id ed th e ra te -b a sed resp o n se s in to rate re triev a l (1 5 % ), ra te e stim atio n (12 % ), a n d rate a nd ad ju stm en t (9 % ). B y rate
3
T h e k in d o f re s p o n s e-t im e m e th o d o lo g y p ro m o te d b y B a s si li (1 9 9 3 ; B a s si li & F le tc h e r, 1 9 9 1 )
w o u ld b e o f so m e h e lp u n d er t h e s e c irc u m s ta n c e s b ec a u s e it ti m e s te le p h o n e re s p o n s es ``li v e ’ ’ a s o p p o s e d t o m e a s u r in g re c o r d e d r es p o n se s . H o w e v e r, o u r p ro c e d u re in v o lv e d c o d i n g re tro s p e c tiv e st ra te g y re p o rt s w h ic h re q u ir es a p e rm a n e n t re c o rd o f th e re p o rt. F o r th is re a s o n w e ta p e re co rd e d th e in te rv i e w s.
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
349
retrie v al w e are re fe rrin g to rate in fo rm atio n sto red so m e tim e p rio r to th e inte rv ie w , e .g . ``F ou r. I g o g ro ce ry sh op p in g o n F rid a y s.’ ’ R a te e stim atio n refe rs to th o se o b ser va tio n s fo r w hic h re sp o nd e n ts co m p u te ra te in fo rm atio nÐ a s o pp o se d to re trie vin g itÐ w h ile an sw e rin g th e q u e stio n. A ra te estim a tio n p ro to co l re fe rred to the re sp on d en t’ s k n ow led g e tha t the e ve n t o cc u rre d reg u la rly b u t w ith a n un c erta in freq u en c y , th a t fre q ue n c y w as so m eh o w co n stru c ted in the re sp o n se p ro c ess. A n ex a m p le , in re sp o n se to the au to m a te d telle r m ac h in e q u estio n, is ``E igh t . . . L ast w e e k I w e n t tw ic e so . . . in th e la st m o n th th at w ou ld be eig h t.’ ’ R e sp on d e n ts w e re c on sid ere d to u se th e rate a n d ad ju stm en t strate gy w h e n the y relie d o n rate in fo rm a tio n (w e d id no t d istin gu ish b etw ee n retriev e d an d estim a ted rate s fo r th is stra te g y) a n d a dju sted u p o r do w n to ac co u n t fo r ex c ep tio ns to th e rate . A n ex a m p le fro m th e q ue stio n ab o u t gro ce ry sh op p ing is: ``E igh t . . . O n c e a w e ek , reg u larly , an d fo u r m ore tim e s fo r . . . sp on ta ne o u s ite m s.’ ’ In a dd itio n to ep iso de en u m era tio n a n d th e se v era l ra te -b ase d stra te g ie s, w e o bse rv ed e vid e nc e in 1 8% o f th e pro to co ls th a t re sp on d en ts re lie d o n g en e ra l im p ressio n s. T h e k e y c h ara c te ristic o f g en er al im pre ssion rep o rts is tha t resp o n d en ts u se a c o arse se n se o f m a gn itu de to infe r a sp ec ific fre q u en c y . T h is w as u su ally in d ic at ed b y so -ca lle d va g u e q u an tifie rs (W r ig h t, G ask e ll, & O ’ M u irch e artaig h , 19 9 4 )Ð m ag n itu d e term s tha t h av e q u an tita tiv e im p lic a tio n s b ut a re n o t ex p lic itly n um e ric al, fo r e xa m p le ``a ll th e tim e’ ’ , o r ``a lo t’ ’ . C on sid er th e fo llo w in g re po rt in resp o n se to the q u estio n a bo u t ba n k te lle r tra n sac tion s. ``E ig h t . . . W e ’ re in th e p ro ce ss o f b u yin g a h ou se so I’ v e b ee n g oin g the re a lot.’ ’ T h is stra teg y is fu n da m e n tally differe n t fro m e nu m era tio n (an d its v a ria nts) an d ra te-b ase d re sp o nd in g (an d its v a ria n ts) in th a t resp o n de n ts w ho lac k an y nu m eric al fre q u en c y in form atio n c an p rov id e a nu m erica l resp o n se b y co n ve rting th eir im pre ssio ns o f fre q u en c y to a n u m b er. T u rn in g n ow to th e z e ro re sp on se s, 2 6 % o f all re p or te d fre q ue n c ie s w ere ze ro . O f the se , 5 % w ere un c o da b le. T h e pro to co ls for th e re m a inin g 2 1% o f the resp o n ses in d ic ate d th a t re sp on d e n ts u se tw o stra teg ies to d eterm in e tha t tha t th e y ha v e no t e ng a ge d in an a c tiv ity o ve r a g iv e n tim e fram e . In p artic u lar, th e pro toc o ls co n ta ine d ev id e nc e o f a tte m p ted e nu m era tio n an d rate re trie v a l. P ro to c o ls w e re co d e d fo r atte m p ted e n u m e ra tio n if th e re w a s ev id en c e th a t a m em or y sea rch fa ile d to lo ca te an y ep iso de s w ithin the tim e p eriod . F o r e xa m p le , a p roto co l p ro vid e d in re sp o nse to th e ic e cre am q ue stio n w a s, ``Z e ro . . . T ry in g to re m e m b e r if m y w ife h a d b o u gh t a n y th is m o n th . S he h asn ’ t.’ ’ T h e se w ere a pp a ren t fo r 1 5 % o f ze ro re sp o nse s. F o r 8 0% o f ze ro re sp o nse s, re sp o nd e n ts in dic ate d th a t th ey n e ve r en g a ge in th e ac tiv ity o r sim p ly kn e w the y ha d n ot d o ne so in th e pre v io u s m on th . T he se p ro to c o ls w e re co d e d for ra te re trie v a l. F o r ex a m p le , in an s w e rin g th e q ue stio n a b o ut A T M a ctiv ity , o ne re sp on d e nt re p or te d ``N on e . . . I d on ’ t u se the m .’ ’
350
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
Regularity and Similarity Ratings C o n siste n t w ith fin din g s rep o rted b y M e no n (1 9 93 ), reg u larity an d sim ila rity ha d cle ar effe cts o n th e ch o ice o f re spo n se stra te g y. M e a n re gu lar ity a n d sim ila rity ra tin g s fo r the m ajo r resp o n se stra teg ies are p rese n te d in T a b le 3 . L o o k in g first at n o n -ze ro resp o n ses , re g ula rity v arie d w ith th e fiv e re spo n se 4 stra teg ies, F (4 ,4 24 ) = 17 .4 1 , P < .0 1 , M SE = 1 2 .8 5 . W h en resp o n d en ts en u m e rate d ep isod es, th e y ju d g ed e v en ts to b e le ss re gu lar th a n w he n the y re triev e d ra tes, F (1 ,4 2 4 ) = 5 4 .8 5, P < .0 1 , M SE = 4 0 .4 9 , c o nfirm in g ou r first p red ictio n . M o re o ve r, re gu larity ra tin g s on tria ls e x hib itin g e p isod e en u m e ra tion w ere lo w e r th a n fo r a ll o th e r strate gie s, F (1 ,4 2 4 ) = 6 2 .5 8, P < .0 1 , M S E = 46 .2 0 , b y a S c h effe te st. T h is last e ffe ct u n d ersc ore s th e ide a th at e v en ts a re en u m era te d p rim a rily w h e n th ey o c c ur o n a n irre g u lar b a sis. F ina lly , fre qu e n cy re p orts re lie d o n ge n era l im p re ssio ns w h en e v en ts w e re le ss re g ula r th a n fo r th e th ree strate gie s in v o lv in g ra te s, F (1,4 24 ) = 1 3 .5 4 , P < .0 1 , b y a S c he ffeÂtest. It see m s, th e re fo re , th a t like en u m e ration , g e n era l im p re ssio n s a re u se d in th e ab se n ce of rate in fo rm a tio n . H o w ev e r, a s is de scrib e d in the n e xt se ctio n, the freq u en c y co n ditio ns u n de r w hic h en u m e ra tion a nd g e ne ral im p ressio n s are u se d are diffe re n t. S im ila rity sho w e d m u ch the sa m e p atte rn as re gu larity. O v era ll, sim ila rity va rie d w ith resp o n se stra te g y, F (4 ,4 2 3 ) = 4 .3 9 , P < .0 1 , M SE = 3 .0 4 . In p articu lar, sim ila rity rating s fo r e p iso d e e n um e ratio n w ere lo w e r th an fo r ra te retriev a l,
TABLE 3 Mean Regularity and Similarity Ratings for the Major Response Strategies R e s p o n se S tr a t e g y
R e g u la r ity *
S i m i la r ity * *
1 . E p is o d e E n u m e ra tio n
2 .3 9
2 .8 6
2 . R a te R e tri e v a l
3 .6 6
3 .5 4
3 . R a te E s ti m a tio n
3 .4 3
3 .3 1
4 . R a te a n d A d j u s tm e n t
3 .6 5
3 .4 3
5 . G en e ra l Im p re ss io n
2 .9 1
3 .1 1
6 . A tte m p te d E n u m e rat io n
1 .8 5
2 .4 6
7 . R a te R e tri e v a l
1 .4 0
2 .1 6
N o n -z er o R e s p o n s es
Z e ro R es p o n s e s
*
1 = v e ry irr eg u la r, 4 = v e ry re g u la r
* * 1 = v e ry d iffe re n t, 4 = v e ry s im il a r
4
A ll A N O V A re su lt s re p o rt ed h e re a re b a s e d o n m o d e ls t h a t in c lu d e a s u b je c t te rm a n d a n i te m
te rm as c la s s ifie d v a ria b le s . T h e s u b j e ct t e rm i s in c lu d e d to a c c o u n t fo r re p e a te d m e as u re s e ffe c ts a n d th e i te m t erm is in c lu d e d to ac c o u n t fo r i te m e ffe c ts . A ll c o n t ra sts re p o rte d o n th e b a s is o f A N O V A a re p l an n e d u n le s s o t h e rw is e n o te d .
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
351
F (1 ,4 2 3 ) = 1 2 .5 4 , P < .0 1 , M S E = 8 .7 0 , c o n firm in g t h e s e c o n d p r e d ic t io n . S im ila rity ra tin g s w ere low e r fo r ep iso de e n um era tio n tha n fo r all o f th e o th e r stra teg ie s, F (1 ,4 2 3 ) = 1 6.4 2, P < .0 1, M S E = 1 1.3 9, b y a Sc h effeÂte st, c on sisten t w ith th e id e a th at en u m era tio n is u sed p rim arily w h e n e piso d es a re q u ite d issim ila r a n d , co n se qu e n tly , d iffe ren tiated in ep isod ic m em o ry . B o th ev e nt c h ar ac te ristic s v aried w ith th e stra teg ies ob se rv ed fo r ze ro resp o n ses. E v en ts w e re ju d g ed le ss re g ula r fo r ra te re trie va l th an for attem pte d en u m e ra tio n , F (1 ,1 4 4 ) = 5 .2 5 , P < .0 5 , M S E = 2 .4 8 , th o ug h b o th m e a n ra tin g s are v ery lo w (1.4 0 a nd 1 .8 5 , re spe ctiv ely ). K n ow in g th a t the ev e nt o f in tere st h a s n o t o cc u rre d in th e re fere n ce p eriod , resp o n de n ts m a y w e ll be m a p pin g the ir b e lie f tha t th e e v en t c o uld h ap p en in a g ive n m o n th o nto th e re gu la rity ra tin g sca le . B y this v ie w , th e m o re p lau sib le it is th at a n ev en t m ig h t oc c ur, th e m o re re g u la rly it is ju d g ed to o cc u r. S im ilarity ra tin g s a re lo w in ge n era l, b ut lo w er fo r rate retrie v al (2.1 6 ) th a n fo r a ttem p ted e n um e ratio n (2 .4 6 ), F (1 ,1 4 1 ) = 4 .3 9 , P < .0 5, M S E = 3 .0 4 . O n e e xp la na tio n is th at re sp o nd e nts tre at th e lo w e n d o f th e sim ila rity sca le a s a ``u n iqu e n ess’ ’ sca le w h e re lo w e r v alu e s are m o re un iq ue : ev e n ts th at a re k n ow n n ev e r to o cc u r w o u ld b e ex trem e ly u n iq u e (lo w sim ila rity ) if th e y w ere so m e h o w to o c cu r, an d e v en ts th at c an p lau sib ly o cc u r w ou ld sh are so m e ch a ra c te ristic s w h e n th e y d o in fac t ta ke p la c e, m a k in g th e m less u n iq u e (hig h er sim ilarity). R e g ula rity a nd sim ilarity w e re co rrela ted a cro ss th e e n tire d ata set; th a t is fo r b oth n o n -z e ro an d z e ro resp o n ses (r = .4 8 , P < .0 1 , n = 9 3 6 ). A ltho u g h o n e ca n im a gin e sc en a rios in w h ich reg u larity a nd sim ilarity a re ind e p en d en t, th eir co rrela tio n is c o nsiste nt w ith o ur e a rlier co n ten tio n th at e v en ts th at o c cu r o n a reg u la r sch e d ule a re ex p e rie n ce d m uc h th e sa m e fro m o ne ep isod e to th e n e xt: ev e n if the y diffe r in all o th er c h ara cteristics, e a ch o cc u rren c e o f a reg u la rly o cc u rrin g e v en t is te m p o rally sim ila r to th e n ex t.
Frequency A no th er fac to r th a t h as be e n sh o w n to affec t w h ich e stim a tio n strateg ie s resp o n d en ts c h oo se is th e a p pro x im a te le v el of an e v en t’ s fre q ue n cy . In p artic u lar, sub jec ts a re m o re lik e ly to en u m e ra te low -freq u e nc y tha n h ig h freq u en c y e ve n ts in arrivin g a t fre q u en c y rep o rts, p re su m a bly b e ca u se th e e ffo rt o f re trie v in g ind iv idu a l ep isod e s inc rea se s w ith the n u m b e r of e p iso d es (B la ir & B urto n , 19 8 7 ; B u rto n & B la ir, 1 9 9 1; M ea n s & L o ftu s, 1 99 1 ). T h is is rep lic ate d in th e cu rre nt stu d y. M ea n freq u e nc ies an d tim e s for fiv e stra teg ies are p rese nte d in T a ble 4 . O v e ra ll, freq u en c ies v a ry w ith stra teg y , F (4 ,4 25 ) = 10 .9 9 , P < .0 1, M S E = 1 1 53 .0 9 . In a d dition , freq u en c y fo r e p iso d e e n um era tio n is lo w e r tha n fo r ra te re trie v al, F (1 ,4 25 ) = 1 6 .2 7 , P < .0 1 , M S E = 17 0 7 .4 0 a n d fo r all o th e r stra teg ie s, F (1 ,4 2 5 ) = 4 1.1 8, P < .0 1, M S E = 4 3 21 .4 3 , by a S c h effeÂte st. T h e o b serv a tio n th at re sp o nd e n ts p rim arily e nu m era te lo w -freq u en c y e v en ts (2.3 o cc u rren c es pe r m on th o n a ve rag e ) m ay w e ll be re la te d to th e p rese nc e o f
352
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN TABLE 4 Mean Frequency and Response Times for the Major Response Strategies R e sp o n s e S t ra te g y
F req uency
T im e (in s e co n d s )
1 . E p i so d e E n u m e ra tio n
2 .3
4 .5 2
2 . R a t e R et rie v a l
7 .8
4 .3 6
3 . R a t e E s tim a ti o n
1 1 .1
7 .2 8
4 . R a t e a n d A d ju s tm e n t
1 1 .9
6 .6 7
5 . G e n e ra l Im p re s s io n
1 2 .3
6 .1 7
6 . A t te m p t e d E n u m e ra ti o n
0
3 .8 7
7 . R a t e R et rie v a l
0
1 .5 8
N o n -z e r o R e s p o n s e s
Z e r o R e s p o n s es
co n tex tua l in fo rm a tio n for th ese ev e n ts. In o rde r to re trie ve e ve n ts, the re m us t b e som e in form atio n to d isting u ish o n e ev e n t from a n oth e r. C o n tex t c an p la y ex a ctly su c h a d isting u ish in g ro le. B e c au se of the ir re p etitio n , h ig h -fre q u en c y ev e nts m a y b ec o m e d e co n tex tua lise d (B a hrick & K aris, 1 9 8 2 ; L in ton , 19 8 2 ; S tru b e, 19 8 7 ) an d so c a nn o t ea sily b e retriev e d . R e sp on d e nts u sed ge n era l im p re ssio n s to re p o rt the hig h est av e ra g e e stim ates (1 2 .3 o cc u rre n ce s p er m o n th ). T his is co n sisten t w ith a fin d in g b y B ruc e (B ruc e & R e e d, 19 8 8 ; B ruc e & V a n P e lt, 1 9 8 9) co n c ern ing estim a tes o f e v en t fre q u en c y o n a b icy c le trip . T h e re la tion sh ip b etw ee n g e n era l im p ressio n s a n d h ig h fre q u e n c y e stim a te s c a n b e e x p lain e d if w e a ssu m e th a t re p e ate d oc c urre n ce s a llo w re sp o n de n ts to d ire ctly , a lb e it im p re cise ly , e n co d e th e fac t th a t p articu lar ep iso d es are fre qu e n t. F o r e x am p le , the fre q ue n cy sto re d fo r a re p e ate d ev e nt m igh t b e ``a lot’ ’ . In freq u e ntly o cc u rrin g e v en ts w o u ld be le ss lik ely to le ad to the im p ressio n th a t th e b eh av io ur is ra re, b ec au se th e re is sim p ly le ss o p po rtun ity to form this im p ressio n . B e ca u se re sp on d en ts d o no t h av e pre c ise ra te in fo rm a tion a v aila ble w he n the y u se a g e ne ra l im pre ssio n stra te g y (th e se e ve n ts re ce ive th e se co n d lo w e st re g u larity rating s), a ll th ey ca n do is co n ve rt th e ir im p re ssio n tha t fre q u en c y is h ig h to a re lative ly la rge n um b er. F ig u re 1 p re se nts the p erc en ta ge s o f d iffe re nt freq u en c y re sp o nse s fo r e p iso d e en u m e ratio n, ra te re trie v al, rate e stim atio n, a n d g en er al im p re ssion stra teg ies. T h e p rim a ry th in g to n otice is th e p e ak s: w h e n resp o nd e n ts e nu m era te d e p iso d es (F ig . 1 a) th eir e stim ate s w e re usu a lly sm a ll w ith th e n um b er o f la rge r e stim ates dro p pi ng o ff q u ick ly . T h e p ea k s for ra te re triev a l (F ig . 1 b ) an d rate estim a tio n (F ig . 1d ) stra te g ies p rim a rily re fle ct w e e kly a ctivity : T h e p ea k s a t fou r, eig ht, an d tw e lv e (o v er the tw o stra te g ie s) su g g est th a t resp o n d en ts h a d a cc e ss to w e e k ly ra te in form atio n an d the n m u ltip lied th ese w ee k ly ra tes by fo u r (th e nu m b er o f w e e ks in a m on th) . A lth o ug h rate re trie v al an d rate e stim a tio n bo th
353
F re q u e n c y o f re p o rte d v a lu e s fo r fo u r s tra te g i e s : (a ) e p is o d e e n u m e ra tio n , (b ) ra te re t ri e v a l , (c ) g e n e ra l im p r es s io n , a n d
(d ) ra te e s tim a tio n .
FIG. 1.
354
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
s h o w e v id e n c e o f c o n v e r ti n g w e e k ly i n f o r m a t io n t o m o n t h l y f i g u r e s , re sp o n de n ts’ v e rb a l pro toc o ls sug g est th at the u n de rly in g ra tes h av e d iffe ren t orig ins fo r the se tw o strate gie s. R e triev e d ra tes a re so n a m e d be c au se the y a pp e a r to b e sto re d ; estim a te d rate s a p p ea r to b e th e re su lt o f p a rtia l en u m e ratio n. T h is distin c tio n is fu rth e r sup p o rted by th e rea c tio n tim e d ata pre se nte d in th e n ex t sec tio n . W h en re spo n d en ts a nsw ere d on th e b a sis of th eir g en e ral im p re ssio n s (F ig . 1c ) th eir estim a te s w e re o ften d ivisib le b y fiv e . T his h a s the a pp e ara nc e o f ro u n di ng (H u tte nlo ch e r, H e d ge s, & B rad b u rn, 1 9 90 ). It w o u ld m ak e sen se fo r re sp o n de n ts usin g th e g en e ra l im p ressio n stra teg y to p ro d uc e ro u n d ed e stim ates be c au se th ey n e ed to co n ve rt the ir im p re ssio n s, w h ich are q u alitativ e , in to nu m b ers; o n e w a y to d o this is to re po rt a p roto ty p ica l q u an tity fo r th e a v aila ble ve rb al d e scrip tio n , fo r e xa m p le , q u an tify in g an im p re ssio n o f ``pre tty o ften ’ ’ a s ``1 0 ’ ’ . In th is d o m a in (as in m an y o th ers) su c h p ro to typ ica l v a lu e s ten d to b e div isib le b y fiv e . O n e re aso n th a t a resp o nd e n t w o uld m ap an im p re ssion to su c h a v alu e is tha t h e o r sh e is p ro b ab ly m o re like ly to thin k o f a p ro to ty p ic al th a n a no n -pr oto typ ic al q ua n tity . M o reo v er to p ro v ide a n on -p roto typ ica l q ua n tity , sa y 11 , w o u ld im p ly a le v el o f p rec isio n th a t a p ro to ty p ica l v a lue w ou ld n o t ne c essa rily c on v ey ; b ec a use th e co n v ersio n fro m a n im p re ssion to a n um b er is in h e ren tly im p re c ise , re sp o nd e nts m ay be m o re in clin ed to rep o rt th e ro un d e d va lu e.
Response Times N o t o n ly d o fre q u en c y rep o rts v a ry w ith re sp o nse strate gie s, b u t th e y are rela te d to resp o n se tim e s in d iffe re nt w ay s fo r th e v a rio u s stra teg ie s. R esp o ns e tim e s ha v e b ee n ex a m in ed in b eh a vio u ral fre qu e nc y stu die s in re latio n to a cc u ra c y (B u rto n & B la ir, 19 9 1 ) an d as a n in d ica to r o f effo rt (M e no n , 19 9 3 ). In th e cu rre nt stu d y, re spo n se tim es p ro v ide d e tail ab o u t h ow th e d iffe re n t stra te gie s are ex e cu te d. In pa rtic ula r, w e p re d ic ted th at a s fre q ue n c y re p o rts b a sed o n en u m e ratio n in c re ase , th e laten c ies for th o se re p or ts sho u ld inc rea se, b u t fre q u en c y a n d tim e sh ou ld no t be asso c iate d fo r ra te-b a sed rep o rts. A s p re dic te d , th e tim e to rep o rt a freq u en c y usin g th is stra teg y in c rea se s w ith 2 th e siz e o f th e fre qu e nc y (r = .2 5, P < .0 1). A lso a s p re d ic ted , th ere is n o re latio nsh ip b e tw e e n resp o n se tim e an d fre qu e n cy w h e n resp o n d en ts a n sw ere d by re triev in g a rate . R eg re ssio n eq u a tio n s, in w h ich resp o n se tim e is a fu n ctio n of estim a ted ra te, a re pre se nte d fo r fiv e stra te g ie s in T ab le 5 . T h e d iffe re nc e s be tw e e n th e fun c tio n s for th ese tw o strate g ie s ind ica te th at, fo r en u m era tio n , a no tic e a ble am ou n t o f tim e is asso c iate d w ith th e re triev a l of e ac h a d d itio na l ep iso de (ab o u t .8 4 sec o n ds, u sin g th e slo pe of the reg re ssio n eq u atio n fo r en u m e ratio n a s a n e stim a te ), b u t fo r rate re trie va l, tim e d oe s no t c h an g e w ith th e siz e o f ra te s; the inv a ria n ce o f tim e w ith fre qu e nc y fo r ra te-b a sed re spo n ses sug g es ts th at ac c ess to ra te in fo rm a tio n re q uire s a fix e d n u m b e r o f m e n ta l
355
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
TABLE 5 Regression Equations for Response Time as a Function of Estim ated Frequency R e sp o n s e S t ra te g y
2
E q u a tio n
r
P
E p is o d e E n u m era ti o n
t im e = 2 .6 4 + .8 4 (re p o rte d fre q u e n c y )
.2 5
< .0 0 0 1
R a te R e tri e v a l
t im e = 4 .2 3 + .0 2 (re p o rte d fre q u e n c y )
.0 0
n .s.
G e n e ra l Im p re ss i o n
t im e = 6 .0 8 + .0 1 (re p o rte d fre q u e n c y )
.0 0
n .s.
R a te E s ti m a tio n
t im e = 5 .5 6 + .1 5 (re p o rte d fre q u e n c y )
.1 4
< .0 0 1 3
R a te a n d A d j u s t m e n t
t im e = 5 .9 7 + .0 7 (re p o rte d fre q u e n c y )
.0 4
n .s.
T i m e i s m e a s u re d in s ec o n d s .
o pe ratio n sÐ p resu m ab ly a sin gle retrie v al. T h ere w as a lso n o re latio nsh ip b etw ee n re spo n se tim e a n d th e m a g nitud e o f th e re po rted freq u e nc ies w h e n resp o n d en ts u sed th e ir g e ne ral im p ressio ns. C lea rly , ge n er al im p ressio n s a re n o t b ase d on en um era tio n . T h e p atte rn fo r th is stra teg y co u ld in dic a te th a t im p ressio n s are retriev e d fully form ed . A ltern a tiv e ly , it c ou ld su gg e st th a t th e resu lt o f asse ssin g o n e’ s m em ory is a g en e ral im p ressio n . W e c an n ot d istin gu ish b etw ee n th e se in te rp reta tio ns o n the b asis o f th e c u rre n t d a ta . W h en resp o n d en ts b a sed the ir e stim ates o n ra te e stim a tio n , the ir re sp on se 2 tim e in cr ea sed w ith th e siz e o f th e estim a tes (r = .1 4, P < .0 1 ) alth o u gh th e rela tio ns hip d o e s n o t a pp e a r to b e as stro n g a s it is fo r ep isod e en u m e ra tion (th e slop e o f th e re gre ssion e q u atio n is .1 5). M ed ian re sp on se tim e s (fo r no n -ze ro resp o n ses) a re p lotted a ga inst rep o rte d fre q u en c y fo r ep iso d e e nu m era tio n an d rate e stim atio n in F ig . 2 . If the re w e re le ss th a n fiv e o b serv ation s fo r a p a rtic u la r freq u en c y , th a t v a lu e w a s o m itted from th e p lot. B oth cu rv e s sh o w a lin ea r rela tio ns hip b etw e en tim e a nd fre q ue n cy , altho u g h th e c urv e fo r rate estim a tio n is c le a rly sh a llo w e r th an th e c u rve fo r en u m e ration . O n e e xp la na tio n fo r a slo p e o f in term e d iate ste e pn e ss is th a t ra tes a re e stim ate d by e nu m era tin g e piso d es fo r a p ortion of th e re fere n ce p e rio d , for ex a m p le a w ee k ; the re sp o nd e nt the n g en e ra lises to th e co m p le te tim e p eriod m u ch as w o u ld be th e c a se w ith rate retrie v al. It is th e ex trap o latio n pa rt of th e stra teg y tha t w o uld w e ak e n th e rela tio ns hip b e tw e e n fre q u en c y an d tim e re la tiv e to tha t o b serv e d for pu re en u m e ra tio n , b ec au se it is p ossib le fo r a sin g le m e n ta l o pe ratio n (p re sum ab ly m u ltip lic a tio n ) to pro d uc e a re la tiv e ly la rg e fre q u en c y re po rt. N o re latio n sh ip b etw e e n fre q u e n cy a n d tim e is e vid e n t for ra te a n d ad ju stm en t. T h ere fo re , rate a n d a d ju stm e n t m ay rese m b le ra te retrie v al m o re tha n ra te estim ation (w he re th ere w a s a p o sitiv e relatio n ship be tw ee n tim e an d freq u en c y ). In bo th ra te a n d ad ju stm en t an d ra te re triev a l, the inf orm ation o n w hic h re sp o n de n ts ba se th e ir estim a tes is k n ow n to th e m a p riori a n d is n o t estim a ted thr ou g h pa rtia l en u m e ratio n . H ow e v er, be c au se resp o n ses b a sed o n rate a n d a dju stm e nt w ere g e ne ra lly slo w er tha n th o se b ase d o n ra te retrie v al, ad ju stin g th e ra te se em s to req u ire e x tra tim e . T h is su gg e stio n is stre n gth e n ed b y
356
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
FIG. 2.
M e d ia n re s p o n s e ti m e as a fu n ct io n o f re p o rte d fre q u e n c y a n d re s p o n s e s tr at e g y .
th e o b serv atio n th a t re g u la rity a nd sim ila rity ju dg e m e n ts fo r th e tw o stra te gie s a r e a b o u t t h e s a m e , i n d i c a t in g t h a t t h e y a r e u s e d u n d e r c o m p a ra b l e circu m stan ce s. A h o m o g en e ity o f slo pe s te st c o n firm s th at the relatio ns hip b e tw e e n tim e a n d fre q u en c y v arie s w ith resp o n se stra teg y , F (4 ,3 6 8 ) = 7 .7 4 , P < .0 1 , M S E = 70 .5 3 . In p a rticu la r, th e reg ress io n lin e fo r ep iso de en u m era tio n w a s stee p er th an tha t fo r ra te r e tr ie v a l a n d g e n e r a l im p r e s si o n , F (1 ,3 6 8 ) = 2 0 .5 6 , P < .0 1 , M S E = 1 87 .4 1 . T h e lin e for ra te e stim ation w a s a lso stee p er th an th at fo r rate
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
357
retrie v al, F (1 ,3 6 8 ) = 6 .2 0, P < .0 5 , M SE = 5 6 .4 7 , b y a S c he ffeÂte st, bu t n o t a s stee p as the e piso d e e n um e ration line , F (1 ,3 68 ) = 1 4 .0 5 , P < .0 1 , M S E = 1 2 8.0 4, b y a S c h effeÂte st, su p p or tin g th e ide a th at the rate e stim atio n stra te gy is in de e d a h yb rid of ep isod e e nu m era tio n a nd ra te re trie va l strate gie s. T h ese re su lts su gg e st tha t resp o nd en ts m a y set a th re sh old fo r tim e sp e n t e n u m e rating a n d o nc e th is is ex c ee d e d, th e y e x tra p ola te. R e g ard less o f th e rep o rte d fre q u en c y , ra te re trie va l is fa ste r th a n e p isod e en u m e ra tio n , F (1 ,3 6 8 ) = 1 2 .3 5 , P < .0 1 . T his esse n tia lly re plica tes a pa tte rn fou n d b y M e n on (1 9 9 3) in w hic h fre q u en c y re sp o n ses fo r reg u lar ite m s w ere faste r th a n th o se for irreg u lar item s. A n d it is a lso c o n siste nt w ith th e fin d in g b y B urto n an d B la ir (1 9 9 1) th at in du c in g re spo n d en ts to u se m o re tim e in resp o n d in g inc rea se s the in cid en c e of e n um e ra tio n . B u t a le sso n of th e cu rren t stud y is tha t o ve ra ll tim e te lls o nly p art o f the sto ry . In arrivin g a t a strate g y, resp o n d en ts a re p rob a b ly in flu en c ed by th e n u m b e r of disc rete , tim e -c on su m in g step s the y w ill n e ed to e x ec u te in ord er to re sp o nd . F in a lly , th e tw o stra teg ies ob se rve d fo r z ero fre qu e nc ie s ha v e d iffe ren t resp o n se tim e s. R a te re trie va l resp o n ses w e re faster th an a tte m p te d en u m e ra tio n, F ( 1 ,1 0 3 ) = 3 0 .7 7 , P < .0 1 , M S E = 7 8 .3 5 . A s i m p l e m o d e l f o r a t te m p te d en u m e ra tio n is th at resp o n d en ts sea rch fo r a rep o rtab le e p iso d e fo r a re aso n ab le am o un t o f tim e a n d a b an d o n th e se arc h (re po rt ``z ero ’ ’ ) a fter th a t. B ase d o n th e reg ress io n e qu a tio n fo r (n o n -ze ro ) ep isod e en u m era tio n , tim e to e n um e rate on e ep iso de is ab o ut 3.5 se co n d sÐ in th e sam e ba llp a rk a s the m e an re sp on se tim e o f 3 .9 se co n d s fo r attem pte d e nu m era tio n . O n e rea d in g is th at su b jec ts’ th re sh old is the tim e re q uire d to e nu m e ra te o ne ite m . R ate retrie v al re sp on se s w ere p artic u larly fast fo r z e ro rep o rts; fa ster, in fa c t, th at n o n -ze ro rep o rts b ase d o n the sa m e strate gy . T h is d iffere nc e co u ld arise if no n -ze ro rep o rts d em an d e x tra tim e w h en a rate e x pre sse d in o n e tem p ora l u n it, sa y w e ek s, is a p plie d to a refe ren c e p erio d e xp re sse d in o the r un its, say a m o n th ; in c on trast, n o suc h ex trap o latio n is re q uired in o rd er to k no w th a t a n e v en t n e v er o cc u rs a n d, the refo re , rep o rt z ero .
A Multivariate Approach to Strategy Choice E a c h o f th e v a ria ble s w e h a ve e x am in e d in th e p re vio u s sec tio n s (reg u la rity, sim ila rity , re po rte d freq u en c y , an d re sp o n se tim e) is re la ted to resp o n d en ts’ ch o ice of estim a tio n stra te g y. O n e p ro b le m w ith lo o k in g at th ese re latio nsh ip s ind ivid u a lly is tha t it is h a rd to se e h ow th e y jo in tly lea d a resp o n de n t to u se a p artic u lar stra teg y o n a pa rtic u la r o c ca sio n. F o r ex a m p le, lo w reg u larity lea d s resp o n d en ts to e n u m e ra te w h e n freq u en c y is lo w ; ho w ev e r, low reg u larity lea d s resp o n d en ts to use th e ir g en e ral im p re ssio ns w h en fre q u en c y is hig h . T h is rela tiv e ly sim p le e xa m ple in v olv es tw o v ariab les a n d tw o stra teg ie s. T h e p attern s b ec o m e h ard er to de sc rib e w he n th e y in v o lv e th re e o r fo u r v ariab les an d as m a n y strate gie s. In ord e r to se e h ow p artic u lar pa tte rns o f se v era l v ariab le s
358
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
are a sso c ia te d w ith the use o f m u ltip le strate gie s w e p e rform ed a d isc rim in an t an a lysis. O u r p rim a ry p u rpo s e w a s to de scrib e the c om b in a tio n s o f v ariab les th a t are re late d to resp o n de n ts’ u se of d iffe ren t stra teg ies, no t to p red ict h ow in div id ua l re sp o n de n ts w o uld a nsw er p a rticu la r q ue stio n s. In fac t, tw o o f th e v a ria ble s in th e an a ly sis (resp o n se tim e an d rep o rte d freq u en c y ) w ere m e asu re d a s p art o f th e re sp o n se p ro ce ss a n d co u ld no t b e use d fo r pre di ctio n p u rpo se s. T h e id e a w a s to fo rm e qu a tio n s fro m v a ria b les su c h a s reg u larity, sim ilarity, rep o rted fre q ue n cy , an d resp o n se tim e s, a n d use th ese e qu a tio n s to te ll u s w h at stra te gy w as m o st lik ely to ha v e b ee n in v olv ed in a n sw e rin g ea c h q u estio n. It w a s th e n p o ssib le to ev a lua te th e ag ree m e n t be tw ee n the strate gy c lassific a tio n s o f th e d isc rim in an t an a lysis a n d th o se o f ou r c o de rs. G oo d a gre e m e nt w o u ld sug g e st th a t th e d isc rim in an t e q u a tio n s c re d ib ly d e sc rib e th e re la tio n sh ip s b e tw e e n th e se va ria b les a n d strateg y ch o ice . R e ca ll tha t th e c od e rs ju d ge d w h a t strate g y w a s use d to a n sw er a qu e stio n so le ly fro m th e c o nte nt o f th e pro to co l, w h ere a s th e eq u atio n s cla ssifie d a n o bse rv atio n sole ly o n the b a sis o f th e d isc rim in a tin g va ria b les, blin d to th e co n te n t o f the p roto co l. In th e in te re st o f sim p lic ity , th e an a ly sis w as lim ited to th re e strate gie s: en u m e ratio n, ra te re trie va l, a n d g en e ral im p re ssio n . T h e se th re e ap p ea r to in v o lv e th e m o st d istin ct un d erly in g o p era tion s, w he re as rate estim a tio n a n d rate an d a dju st strate gie s a re ba sica lly v a ria n ts o f en u m e ra tio n an d /or ra te retriev a l. T h e d iscrim in a n t fu nc tion s w ere d ev e lo p ed u n de r th e a ssum ptio n th a t a ny o f th e th re e strate gie s co u ld o c cu r w ith eq u al p rob a b ility . T h e fu n ctio n s w ere cre a te d to differe ntia te b etw e en th ese strate gie s o n th e ba sis o f fiv e d isc rim in ating v ariab les: reg u la rity, sim ilarity, fre qu e n cy , re spo n se tim e , an d an in dic ato r va riab le th at w a s eq u al to 1 if th e e stim a te w a s d iv isible by five an d 0 if it w a s n ot. T h e last va ria b le w a s c rea ted b ec au se resp o n de n ts ap p ea re d to ro un d th eir estim a te s to m u ltip les of fiv e w h e n the y re lie d o n ge n era l im p re ssio ns. T w o d isc rim in a n t fu n ctio n s e m e rg e d fro m th e a n aly sis. T h e y w ere th e n u se d to cla ssify th e stra te g y fo r e ac h ob se rv a tio n . T h e re su lts ag re ed w ith th e c od e rs’ ju d g em en ts o n 6 5% o f the o b serv a tio n s. A s w e h av e alre ad y n o te d , re gu lar ity an d sim ilarity are c orre lated . W e m ig h t, th ere fo re , b e a b le to rem o v e o n e o f th e se va ria b le s w itho u t sac rific in g c la ssific a tio n po w e r. S im ila rly , the in dic ato r va ria b le th a t is co n ce rne d w ith div isib ility b y fiv e is ba se d on fre q ue n cy an d so th o se tw o v a ria b le s a re n ot in d ep e n de n t. T h e re fo re, th e fu n ction s m ig h t b e fu rthe r sim p lifie d b y re m o v ing o n e o f the se . T o co n stru c t m o re p a rsim on io u s fu n c tio n s, w e p e rfo rm e d a ste p -w ise d isc rim in a n t a na ly sis. T h is re su lte d in tw o disc rim ina n t fu n ctio ns th a t in clu d ed reg u larity, resp o n se tim e a nd d iv isibility b y fiv e : s tra te gy = .2 2 re g ula rity + .2 7 r es p on se tim e + .8 7 d iv is ib le by f iv e s tra te gy = .9 8 re g ula rity ± .3 1 re sp o n se tim e ± .3 3 d ivisi ble b y five .
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
359
T h e first fu n ction is c lea rly d riv e n b y div isib ility b y fiv e w ith m od e rate co n trib u tio n s fro m th e o th e r d isc rim in atin g v aria ble s. It sh ou ld, th e re fo re, d isc rim in ate th e use o f g en e ral im p re ssio n s from th e o th er strate gie s b ec au se o f the ro u n din g th a t is ty p ic al w h en usin g th is k ind o f n o n-n u m e rica l in form atio n. T h e se c on d fu n c tio n is do m in a te d by reg u la rity w ith m o d era te co n trib u tio n s from th e oth e r tw o te rm s. T h is fu n ctio n sh ou ld b e e ffe ctiv e at d iscrim in a tin g b etw ee n rate re trie v al a nd e p iso d e e n um e ration b ec a u se th ey a re o n op p o site en d s o f th e re g ula rity ra ng e (rate retriev a l is hig he st, ep isod e e nu m era tio n is low e st). T he m o d e rate re sp o n se tim e effe c t in b o th fu n ctio n s sh o u ld h e lp to d isting u ish b e tw e e n th e u se o f g e ne ra l im p re ssio n s o n the on e h a n d, a n d e p isod e en u m e ra tio n an d rate retriev a l on th e oth er. T h e av e rag e resp o n se tim e fo r g e ne ra l im pr essio n s is 6.1 7 sec o n d s an d th e a v er ag e tim es fo r ep iso d e en u m e ra tio n an d ra te re trie va l are 4.5 2 a nd 4 .5 6 sec o n ds re sp ec tiv e ly . T h e se re d uc e d fu nc tion s w e re alm ost a s e ffec tiv e a t cla ssify in g stra teg y fo r ea c h re spo n se a s w ere th e m ore c o m p lic a te d fu n ctio ns: th e a g re e m e n t b etw ee n the fun c tio n s a n d c o de rs w as 6 4 .4 % . T h e a g re e m e nt fo r e ac h of th e stra teg ies is p re se nte d in T ab le 6. W e in terp ret th is a s a rea so n ab le lev e l o f ag re em en t b ec au se th e fun c tio n s in v olv e on ly th ree d isc rim ina ting v ariab le s an d still a g re e 2 w ith th e co d ers on a b ou t tw o third s o f th e o b serv a tio n s. A c te st on T a ble 6 co n firm s th at th is p attern of a g re em en t w o uld n o t b e ex p e cted by ch a nc e 2 ( c = 1 54 .9 4 , P < .0 01 ), su p p o rtin g ou r im p re ssion tha t th e se d isc rim ina n t fun c tio n s suc c e ssfu lly d iffe ren tiate am on g the se stra te g ies. T h e d isc rim ina n t a na lysis illustra te s th at se v era l fac tors sim ulta ne o usl y a ffec t resp o n d en ts’ strate gy u se. It se e m s lik ely th a t resp o n d en ts w e igh th e av a ila ble info rm a tio n a n d se ttle o n o ne o r m o re stra teg ie s to p u rsu e . C o n side r a n e v en t tha t o c cu rs irreg u la rly a n d o ften . B ec au se of the ev e nt’ s irre gu la rity , th e resp o n d en t is no t lik e ly to a do p t a ra te stra te g y; h o w ev e r h e o r sh e m a y b e a ble
TABLE 6 Classification Results from Discriminant Analysis P r e d ic te d S tr a te g y G e n e ra l C o d e d S tr a te g y E n u m e ra t io n
R a te R e tri e v a l
G e n e ra l Im p re ss i o n s
N u m b e r o f C a s es 162
92
108
E n u m e r a ti o n 11 7
R a t e R e t ri e va l
Im p r e s s io n s
37
8
7 2%
2 3%
5%
18
57
17
2 0%
6 2%
19%
32
17
59
3 0%
1 6%
55%
T o p e n tri e s in e a c h c e ll are n u m b e r o f c a s e s ; b o tt o m e n trie s a re p e rc e n ta g e o f ca s e s in r o w .
360
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
to re ca ll an d c ou n t d istin ct e p iso d es . B ec a us e th e ev e n t o c cu rs fre qu e n tly , th e re sp o n de n t is lik e ly to ha v e the im p re ssion tha t it o cc u rs freq u en tly . A ssu m in g it is q uic k er to c o n ve rt a n im p ressio n to a n u m b e r th an to e n um e rate a larg e nu m b er o f e piso d es, th e re sp on d en t w o u ld b a se h is o r h er e stim a te o n a ge n era l im pre ssio n.
A TAXONOMY OF STRATEGIES T h e m u ltip le stra te g y v ie w is d ep icte d in te rm s o f th e un d er ly ing pro c esse s fo r 5 ea ch stra te gy in F ig . 3 . F ro m o u r pe rspe c tiv e , stra teg y se lec tio n is restricte d b y th e c o nte nts o f m e m o ry , b ut n o t d icta te d b y th em . A strate gy m a y b e se le cte d w h e n th e rele va n t info rm a tio n is av a ila ble , a lth o u gh in sev e ral situ a tio n s o th e r stra teg ies m a y be a p plica b le a s w ell. H o w ev e r, a g ive n stra te gy w ill d e fin itely no t be sele cted w h en th e re q uisite info rm a tio n is u na v aila ble . T h is p o sitio n im p lie s th a t re sp o n d e n ts m u st o f te n c h o o se b e tw e e n se v e r a l c o m p e tin g stra teg ies. It is lik e ly th at task d em a nd s (e .g . tim e av a ila ble fo r a resp o nse , im po rta nc e of a n ac cu ra te re spo n se ), c on te xt (e.g . p rev iou s stra te g ie s), a n d th e ea se w ith w h ic h d iffere n t typ e s of rele va n t in fo rm atio n c an b e re ca lle d, all in flu en c e the stra te gy se le c tio n p ro ce ss. A t th e h ig he st lev e l w e d istin g u ish b e tw e en en u m e ratio n stra te g ies a n d all oth e r strate gie s. T his reflec ts o u r be lie f th at the re is a fun d a m e n ta l d iffe ren c e be tw e e n u sin g rem em b ere d ep isod e s an d u sin g g e ne ric, ev e nt-typ e info rm atio n a s th e ba sis of a fre q ue n cy rep o rt. T w o o f th e strate gie s w e e xp lo re d ap p e ar u nd e r th e 6 ``E n u m e ra tion ’ ’ h e ad in g : ep iso de en u m e ra tio n a nd rate e stim atio n. T h e first o f th e se is th e sim p le re triev e a n d co u n t stra te g y. It y ie lds th e low e st freq u en c y re p o rts a n d is u sed for th e m os t d istin gu ish a ble an d le a st reg u la r e v en ts. T h e se co n d strate g y, ra te estim a tio n , ap p e ars u nd e r E n um e ra tio n in F ig . 3 be c au se th e rela tio n sh ip b etw ee n rea c tio n tim e s a n d fre qu e nc y rep o rts im plies th a t re sp on d en ts re triev e ind ivid u al e piso d es fro m a sam ple p ortio n o f th e re fe ren c e pe riod an d th en ex tra po late to th e en tire pe rio d . T h e strate g y se em s to be pre ferre d for ev e nts of m o d era te re g ula rity a n d sim ilarity , a nd it p ro d uc es la rge e stim ates. T h e se fa cto rs, in c o m b ina tio n , m ay lea d re sp on d e nts to sto p en u m e ratin g be for e th ey h a ve re triev e d a ll ep iso d es. It is d iffic ult to re c all ep iso de s tha t a re n o t h igh ly distin c tiv e an d re sp o nd e n ts m ay sen se th a t th ere is a la rge n u m b e r o f suc h e piso de s to re trie ve ; th e re g u la rity o f th e e v en ts g iv e s re sp o n de n ts lic en c e to ab a n do n th eir e nu m era tio n an d e xtrap o la te to th e fu ll re fe ren c e p erio d . T h e rig ht side o f F ig . 3 , N o n -e n u m era tio n , is su bd iv id e d in to strate gie s tha t re ly on D ire c t R e triev a l p ro ce sse s a n d th o se th at rely o n so m e typ e of M em o ry 5
T h is i s q u it e s im il a r to th e t ax o n o m y th a t h a s e m e rg e d fro m la b o ra to ry w o r k (B r o w n , 1 9 9 5 ),
a lth o u g h th e c u rre n t ta x o n o m y is a n e x te n s io n in th a t it i n c l u d e s ra t e st ra te g i e s. 6
W e d id n o t o b s e rv e a n e n u m e ra te a n d a d ju st s tra te g y h e re e v e n t h o u g h o n e o f u s (B ro w n , 1 9 9 5 )
h a s o b s e rv e d s u c h a s tr at e g y in a l a b o ra to ry a n al o g u e t o t h i s s tu d y .
361
FIG. 3.
A t ax o n o m y o f st ra te g ie s fo r a n s w e rin g b e h av io u ra l fr eq u en c y q u e s ti o n s .
362
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
A sse ssm en t. D ire c t R etriev a l stra teg ies op e rate o n in fo rm a tio n tha t is e nc o de d in 7 re sp o n de n ts’ m em or y b efo re th ey h e ar th e q ue stion . T h is store d in fo rm a tio n ca n b e Q ua n tita tiv e o r Q ua litative . T h e k in d o f qu a ntita tive in fo rm atio n th a t is sto red is rate inf orm ation , fo r ex a m ple the k n o w le d ge th a t ``I pu rc h ase g a s 8 sev e ral tim es a w e ek ’ ’ . B o th the rate re trie va l a nd rate an d ad just stra te gie s see m to rely on retriev e d k n o w le d g e o f th is typ e , a nd b o th a re a p plied to re g ula r an d sim ila r ev e nts. H igh re gu lar ity is a p rere q uisite fo r th e a v ailab ility o f rate in fo rm a tio n a n d h ig h sim ila rity d isco u ra ge s ep isod e e n um e ra tion (M e n on , 19 9 3 ). In c o ntra st to stra te g ie s th at u se sto red qu a ntita tive in form atio n, a ge n era l im p res sio n strate g y c o u ld re ly o n sto re d , q u alitativ e c h a ra c terisa tio n s o f fre q u en c y, su ch a s ``I d o it a ll th e tim e ’ ’ . F rom th is p e rsp ec tiv e , th e stra te g y ha s tw o p a rts: a sto red im p ressio n m u st b e re trie v ed an d , o n ce it is retrie v ed , th e im pre ssio n m u st b e c on v erte d in to a n ac tu al n u m b e r. T h is co n v ersio n p roc ess strik es u s a s a p ossib le loc u s fo r th e k ind s o f re spo n se sc ale e ffe cts re p orte d b y S ch w a rz an d h is c ollea g u es (e.g . M e no n , R ag h u bir, & S ch w a rz, 1 9 95 ; S c h w arz & B ien ia s, 1 9 9 0 ; S c h w arz & H ip p ler, 1 98 7 ; S ch w a rz, H ipp le r, D eu tsc h , & S tra c k, 1 9 85 ). B a sic ally, the fin d in g is th at w h e n su rv e y re sp on d en ts a re ask e d to re p o rt fre q u en cy ju d g em en ts u sin g fix e d resp o n se ca teg o ries, the siz e of th o se ca teg o rie s affe c ts the a v era ge e stim a tes. F or e x am ple , m o re pe o ple rep o rt lo w 1 fre q u en c ie s o f telev isio n w atc h in g w h e n th e sc ale ra ng e s fro m ``u p to 2 ho u r’ ’ to 1 1 ``m or e tha n 2 2 ho u rs’ ’ th an w h e n it ra n ge s from ``u p to 2 2 h ou rs’ ’ to ``m or e tha n 1 4 2 ho u rs’ ’ (S c hw a rz & H ipp ler, 1 9 8 7; S ch w arz et a l., 1 9 85 ). O u r v ie w is tha t w ith o ut a p re c ise m e tric to d riv e th e c on v e rsio n o f an im pre ssion to a n um b er, re sp o n de n ts m ay a ssig n ex trem e im p re ssio n s lik e ``rare ly ’ ’ a nd ``all th e tim e ’ ’ to th e ex tre m e c a te g orie s, re ga rd less o f the n u m e ric a l la b e ls fo r tho se c ateg o ries, an d e stim ate s th ey c o n sid e r to b e ty p ic a l to th e m id d le c a te g or y, a ga in , w itho u t re g a rd to th e la be l. T h e fa r rig ht bra n c h in F ig . 3 is title d M e m ory A sse ssm en t. T h e stra teg ies in th is c lass are d istin g uish ed fro m th e o th ers in th a t th e y y ie ld freq u en c ies on th e ba sis of ju d g e m e nts a bo u t m em ory p roc e sses a nd states , rath er tha n c o nte n t, a n d th e se ju dg e m e n ts a re m a d e a t th e tim e o f re sp on d in g. In ad d itio n to th e av a ila b ility h eu ristic (T v e rsk y & K a h n em an , 1 9 73 ), o th e r strate gie s in th is cla ss 7
T h i s i s al s o tru e , o f c o u rs e, f o r a l l s tra te g ie s i n v o l v i n g e n u m e ra tio n , a s in d i v i d u al e p i so d e s a re
d i re ct ly ret rie v e d . 8
R a te re trie v a l co u ld , in p rin c ip le , b e su b d iv id e d in to t h o s e c a s e s in w h ic h t h e re s p o n d e n t re tri e v e s
a ra te th a t is e x p re s s e d in th e s am e u n its a s th e r efe re n c e p e rio d , an d th o s e in w h i ch a ra te is re t rie v ed w h ic h i s a s so c ia te d w it h a u n it t h a t is s m a ll er th a n th e re fe ren c e p e rio d an d is t h e n m u lt ip lie d to e x te n d to th e c o m p le te ti m e fra m e . T h is is s i m i la r to t h e d e c o m p o s itio n s tra t eg ie s (A rm s tro n g , D en n is to n , & G o rd o n , 1 9 7 5 ) t h a t h a v e b e e n o b s e rv ed b y B rad b u rn , R ip s , a n d S h e v e l l (1 9 8 7 ) a n d B la ir a n d B u rt o n (1 9 8 7 ). B ec a u s e t h e s e tw o v a ria n ts o f ra t e re t rie v al re ly o n th e sa m e u n d e rly in g p ro c e ss e s (w it h th e ex c e p t io n o f t h e e x tra p o l a tio n st e p ), a n d a re a p p l ie d u n d e r i d e n ti ca l s im il ar it y , re g u la rit y , a n d fre q u e n c y c o n d it io n s , w e h a v e n o t d is ti n g u i sh e d b e tw e e n th e m i n t h i s t a x o n o m y .
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
363
m ig ht tak e stoc k o f th e fa m iliarity o f e ve n ts (W h ittle sea , 1 9 9 3) an d th e sim ila rity of w h at is rem em b ere d to w h a t is b e in g ask e d a bo u t (H in tz m a n , 1 98 8 ; Jo ne s & H e it, 1 9 9 3 ). W e h a ve n ot d ire ctly o b serv e d m em o ry a ssessm e nt stra teg ies in o u r stu d y, an d , d esp ite co m p e llin g e xp e rim en ta l ev id en c e for th e ir u se, o the r re sea rc he rs in the a re a rep o rt th e sa m e c u riou s ab se n ce of the se strate gie s (e.g . B lair & B u rto n, 1 98 7 ). O n e re aso n fo r th is a bse n ce m ig h t b e th e lim its o f v e rb a l p roto co lsÐ th e p rim ary d a ta fo r ide n tify ing stra te g ie s in o ur stu d y a n d m o st oth e r stud ie s o f b eh a vio ur al fre q ue n c y (B la ir & B u rto n , 1 98 7 ; B u rto n & B la ir, 1 9 9 1; M ea n s & L o ftus, 1 9 9 1; M en o n, 1 9 9 3). A c cu ra te v e rba l re p orts a b ou t a m e n ta l p roc e ss req u ire th a t w o rk in g m e m o ry b e in v olv ed in th e p roc e ss (E ric sso n & S im o n, 1 99 3 ). B e ca u se m em o ry a sse ssm e n t d o es no t inv o lve tran sfe rrin g in fo rm a tio n from lo n g -te rm m em ory into w ork in g m em ory Ð it inv o lv e s jud g e m e n ts a bo u t the sta te o f lon g -term m e m o ry Ð p e op le c an n ot v e rba lly re p o rt a b o ut th e stra teg y (N isb e tt & W ilso n , 1 9 7 7; W ilso n , 19 9 4 ). T his ra ise s th e p o ssib ility tha t so m e o f the u n c od a ble re spo n se s (1 8 % of th e n o n-z e ro resp o n ses) w e re b ase d o n m e m o ry asse ssm e n t. In a dd itio n , so m e o f th e v erb al rep o rts th at w e a ssoc iate w ith g e n e ra l im p re ss io n re sp o n se s c o u ld im p l ic a te m e m o ry as se s sm e n t, alth ou g h w e c an n o t te st th at he re .
CONCLUSIONS P eo p le c an an sw e r qu e stio n s ab o ut th e fre qu e nc y o f the ir be h av io u rs u sin g a v ariety o f stra teg ies b u t th e set o f stra teg ies th a t is u sef ul o n a n y o ne o c ca sio n is lim ite d b y w h at in fo rm atio n is a v aila b le. O u r m u ltiple strate gy pe rsp ec tiv e m ak e s cle ar w h a t stra te g ies ca n no t b e u sed w h e n th e n ec es sary in fo rm a tion is la ck ing . O ne p ra c tica l c o nc e rn ra ised b y th is is th e fac t th at p eo p le a re a b le to p ro vid e n um eric al resp o n ses w h e n th ey lac k nu m erica l in fo rm a tio n Ð th at is, w he n the y k no w v irtu ally n o thin g a b o ut the a ctu al q ua n titie s inv o lve d . O f th e no n -ze ro resp o n ses, 1 8% w ere b ase d o n g e ne ral im p re ssio n s. If o u r p ro p os al ab o u t th e w a y p eo p le pro d u ce th e se e stim a tes is rig ht, the n it d o es n o t b o de w e ll fo r the qu a lity o f th ese estim a te s. B e ca u se p e op le c an m a p th e ir im p re ssio n s to w ha te ve r n um eric al in form a tio n is av a ila b le (su ch as a re sp o nse sc a le ) o r to p roto ty p ica l v alu es (su c h as n u m b e rs d iv isib le by fiv e), it is un lik ely th a t th e ir e stim a te s a re a s ac c ura te a s su rve y spo n so rs a ssum e th ey a re. T h e lo g ic a l ne x t ste p is to stu d y th e ac c ura cy ra n ge s fo r th e strate gie s w e h av e id e n tified in th e c urre n t stu d y. W e ha v e b e g un to a d d re ss th e issu e o f w h at stra teg y is use d w h e n th e info rm a tio n req u ire d fo r sev e ra l stra teg ies is av ailab le . O ur d isc rim in an t a n aly sis p r o v id e s s o m e o f t h e fl a v o u r o f p la u s ib l e d e c is io n r u le s u n d e r t h e s e circ um stan c es. H ow e ve r, w e n ee d an e xp licit m o de l o f h o w resp o n de n ts ac tua lly c ho o se strate g ie s w h e n the y a re a ske d a fre q ue n c y q u estio n. T h is w o uld p ro v ide a m o re c om p le te the o retica l a cc o u n t o f the estim a tio n p roc e ss a n d c ou ld b e v a lu a ble to su rve y pra ctition e rs.
364
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
In co n jun c tio n w ith th es e ad d itio na l re sea rc h ac tiv itie s, ou r fin d in g s c a n h elp su rv ey p rac titio n ers in tw o w a y s. F irst, it m a y b e p o ssib le to d ev e lo p in terv e n tio ns tha t he lp to re d uc e erro r fo r pa rtic ula r stra te gie s. F o r ex a m ple , if re sp o n de n ts are lik ely to en u m e ra te w he n the y an sw e r a p a rticu la r qu e stio n the n th e in terv e n tio n sh o u ld b e de sign e d to h elp th e m re ca ll m ore ep iso d es, in m o re d e ta il (e .g . F ish e r & Q u ig le y , 1 9 9 2 ); if re s p o n d e n ts u s e th e ir g e n e ra l im pre ssio ns, th e inte rv e ntio n m ig ht p ro v ide h elp fu l n u m e ric a l re fe re nc e s (e .g . B ro w n , 1 9 95 ). T h e p artic u la r in te rv en tio n w o u ld b e de term in e d b y th e stra te g y th a t is m o st lik ely g iv e n th e p a tte rns o f p red ictiv e v ariab le s. S e c on d , if it is p o ssible to in fe r w h at stra te g ie s re sp on d e nts ha v e use d , th e surv e y p rac titio n e r c an a d ju st th e pu b lish e d freq u en c y statistic s fo llo w in g th e lo g ic o f sea so n al (e.g . B ell & H illm er, 1 9 84 ) o r q ua lity (A rm k n ec ht & W ey b a ck , 19 8 9 ) ad justm e n t. If on e ca n estab lish th e d irec tio n an d m a g nitud e s o f e rrors fo r pa rtic u lar strate gie s in p a rtic u la r su rv e y d om ain sÐ po ten tially b y p re te stin g a sm a ll su b sam p le for w h om v e rifica tio n d ata a re a v ailab leÐ the n the d ata a n aly st ca n in c rem en t or d e cre m e nt th e rep o rted e stim a tes a c co rd ing ly. T h e g oa l o f brin gin g m em o ry rese a rc h to b e ar o n surv e y s is to im p ro v e d ata qu a lity fo r th e surv e y p rac titio n e r a nd to p ro du c e m ore re alistic th eo ries for th e psy c ho lo g ist. T h e cu rren t stu d y is on e ste p in sa tisfy in g th e se g oa ls. H ow o fte n ha s inte rd isc ip lin ary w ork o f th is k in d a c tua lly fo rg e d n e w kn o w led g e? T ha t all de p en d s o n h o w y ou g o a b o ut a nsw e ring the q ue stio n .
REFERENCES A rm k n e ch t, P ., & W ey b a ck , D . (1 9 8 9 ). A d j u s tm e n ts f o r q u a l ity ch a n g e in th e U .S . C o n s u m e r P ric e I n d e x . J o u rn a l o f O f fici a l S ta ti st ic s , 5 , 1 0 7 ±1 2 3 . A rm st ro n g , S .J ., D e n n is to n , W .B ., & G o rd o n , M .M . (1 9 7 5 ). T h e u s e o f th e d ec o m p o s it io n p rin c ip le i n m ak in g ju d g m e n ts . O r g a n i z a tio n a l B e h a v io r a n d H u m a n P e rf o r m a n c e, 1 4 , 2 5 7 ±2 6 3 . B a h ri c k , H ., & K a ri s, D . (1 9 8 2 ). L o n g te rm e c o lo g i ca l m e m o ry . In C .R . P u ff (E d .), H a n d b o o k o f r e s e a r c h m e t h o d s in h u m a n m e m o r y a n d c o g n it io n (p p .4 2 7 ±4 6 5 ). N ew Y o rk : A c a d e m ic P re s s. B a rc la y , C ., & W e ll m an , H . (1 9 8 6 ). A c c u ra c ie s a n d in a c cu ra c ie s in a u to b io g ra p h ic a l m e m o rie s . J o u rn a l o f M e m o ry a n d L a n g u a g e, 2 5 , 9 3 ±1 0 3 . B a rs al o u , L .W ., & R o s s , B .H . (1 9 8 6 ). T h e ro le s o f a u t o m a t ic a n d s tra te g ic p ro c e s si n g in s e n s i tiv it y t o s u p e ro rd in a te a n d p ro p e rty fre q u e n c y . Jo u rn a l o f E x p er i m e n ta l P sy c h o l o g y : L e a r n i n g , M e m o ry a n d C o g n itio n , 1 2 , 1 1 6 ±1 3 4 . B a ss i li, J.N . (1 9 9 3 ). R e sp o n s e la te n c y v e rsu s c e rta in ty as in d e x es o f th e s tre n g th o f v o ti n g i n t e n t io n s in a C A T I s u rv e y : P u b li c O p in io n Q u a r t er ly , 5 5 , 3 3 1 ±3 4 6 . B a ss i li, J .N ., & F l e tc h e r, J .F . (1 9 9 1 ) . R e s p o n s e-t im e m e a s u re m en t in s u rv e y re s e a rc h : A m e th o d fo r C A T I a n d a n e w lo o k a t n o n a tt itu d es . P u b lic O p in i o n Q u a r te r ly, 5 7 , 5 4 ±6 1 . B e g g , I., M a x w e l l, D ., M it te re r, J.O ., & H a rris , G . (1 9 8 6 ). E s ti m at e s o f fre q u e n c y : A tt rib u t e o r a t trib u tio n ? J o u r n a l o f E x p e r im e n ta l P s y c h o l o g y : L e a r n in g , M em o r y , a n d C o g n it io n , 1 2 , 4 9 6 ±5 0 8 . B e ll, W .R ., & H i llm e r, S .C . (1 9 8 4 ). Is s u e s in v o lv e d w ith th e s e a s o n a l ad ju s tm e n t o f e c o n o m i c t im e s e ri es . J o u rn a l o f B u si n e s s a n d E co n o m ic S ta tisti c s, 2 , 2 9 1 ±3 4 9 . B la ir, E ., &
B u rt o n , S . (1 9 8 7 ). C o g n i tiv e p ro c e s se s u se d b y s u rv e y re s p o n d en ts to a n s w e r
b e h av io ra l fre q u e n cy q u e s tio n s. J o u r n a l o f C o n s u m e r R e s e a r c h , 1 4 , 2 8 0 ±2 8 8 . B o u s fie ld , W .A ., S e d g e w ic k , C .H .W ., & C o h e n , B .H . (1 9 5 4 ). C e rta in te m p o ra l c h a ra c te ris t ics o f t h e re c a ll o f v e rb a l a s s o ci a te s . A m e r ic a n J o u r n a l o f P s y c h o lo g y , 6 7 , 1 1 1 ±1 1 8 .
STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING FREQUENCY
365
B ra d b u rn , N .M ., R i p s , L .J ., & S h e v e l l, S .K . (1 9 8 7 ). A n s w e rin g a u to b i o g ra p h ic al q u e s ti o n s : T h e im p ac t o f m e m o ry a n d in fe re n c e o n s u rv e y s. S c ie n c e, 2 3 6 , 1 5 7 ±1 6 1 . B re w e r, W .F . (1 9 8 8 ). M e m o ry fo r ra n d o m ly s a m p l ed a u t o b io g rap h ic a l ev e n t s . In U . N ei s se r & E . W i n o g ra d (E d s .), R e m e m b e r in g r e c o n s id e re d (p p .2 1 ±9 0 ). N e w Y o rk : C am b rid g e U n i v e rs it y P re s s . B ro w n , N .R . (1 9 9 5 ). E s tim a tio n st ra te g ie s a n d t h e ju d g m e n t o f e v e n t f re q u e n c y . Jo u rn a l o f E x p er i m e n ta l P s y c h o lo g y : L e a rn in g , M e m o ry a n d C o g n it io n , 2 1 , 1 5 3 9 ±1 5 5 3 . B ru c e, D ., H o c k le y , W .E ., & C ra ik , F .I.M . (1 9 9 1 ). A v a ila b ility a n d c a te g o ry -fre q u e n c y in fo rm a tio n . M e m o r y & C o g n it io n , 1 9 , 3 0 1 ±3 1 2 . B ru c e, D ., & R e a d , J .D . (1 9 8 8 ). T h e h o w a n d w h y o f m e m o ry fo r fre q u e n c y . In M .M . G ru n e b e rg , P .E . M o rris , & R .N . S y k e s ( E d s.), P r a c ti c a l a sp e c ts o f m e m o r y : C u r r e n t r e s e a r c h a n d i ss u e s , V o l . 1 , M e m o ry in e v er y d a y li fe (p p .3 1 7 ±3 2 2 ). N ew Y o rk : Jo h n W i le y & S o n s . B ru c e, D ., & V a n P e lt , M . (1 9 8 9 ). M e m o ri e s o f a b i c y c le t o u r. A p p l ie d co g n i tiv e P s y c h o lo g y, 3 , 1 3 7 ±1 5 6 . B u rto n , S ., & B l a ir, E . (1 9 9 1 ). T as k c o n d it io n s , re s p o n s e fo rm u la ti o n p ro ce s s e s , a n d re s p o n s e a cc u ra c y fo r b e h a v i o ra l fre q u e n c y q u e s ti o n s i n s u rv e y s . P u b l ic O p in io n Q u a rt e rly , 5 5 , 5 0 ±7 9 . E ri c ss o n , K .A ., & S im o n , H .A . (1 9 9 3 ). P r o to c o l a n a ly s is : V e r b a l r e p o r ts a s d a t a , R e v is e d E d itio n . C a m b ri d g e , M A : M IT P re s s . F i sh e r, R .P ., & Q u i g l ey , K .L . (1 9 9 2 ) . A p p l y i n g c o g n it iv e th e o ry in p u b l ic h e a lt h in v e s t ig a t io n s: E n h a n c in g fo o d re c al l w i th t h e co g n i tiv e in te rv ie w . I n J.M . T a n u r (E d .), Q u es t io n s a b o u t q u e s tio n s : In q u ir ie s i n t o th e c o g n it iv e b a si s o f s u r v e y s (p p .1 5 4 ±1 7 2 ). N e w Y o rk : R u ss e ll S a g e F o u n d a t io n . H in tz m a n , D .L . (1 9 7 6 ). R e p e titio n an d m e m o r y . In G .H . B o w e r ( E d .), T h e p sy c h o l o g y o f l e a r n in g a n d m o ti va ti o n ( V o l. 1 0 , p p .4 7 ±9 1 ). N ew Y o rk : A c a d e m ic P re s s. H in tz m a n , D .L . (1 9 8 8 ). J u d g m en ts o f fre q u en c y a n d re c o g n itio n m e m o ry i n a m u l tip le -t ra ce m e m o ry m o d e l . P s y c h o lo g ic a l R e v ie w , 9 5 , 5 2 8 ±5 5 1 . H o w e ll , W .C . ( 1 9 7 3 ). R e p re s en ta t io n o f fre q u e n c y i n m e m o ry . P s y ch o lo g i ca l B u ll et in , 8 0 , 4 4 - 5 3 . H u b b ard , M . ( 1 9 9 2 ). L a b o ra to ry ex p e rim e n t s t e st in g n e w q u e s ti o n in g t ec h n iq u es . In C .F . T u rn e r, J.T . L e s s le r, & J.C . G fro e re r (E d s .), S u r ve y m e a su r e m en t o f d r u g u s e : M e th o d o lo g i c a l s tu d ie s (p p .5 3 ±8 4 ). W a sh in g to n , D C : U S G o v e rn m e n t P rin ti n g O ffi c e. H u t te n l o c h e r, J ., H e d g e s , L ., & B ra d b u rn , N . (1 9 9 0 ). R e p o rts o f e la p se d ti m e : B o u n d i n g a n d ro u n d i n g p ro ce s s e s in e s ti m a tio n . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r im e n ta l P s y ch o lo g y , 1 6 , 1 9 6 ±2 1 3 . J o h n s o n , M .K ., R a y e , C .L ., W a n g , A .Y ., & T a y l o r, T .H . ( 1 9 7 9 ). F a c t a n d fa n ta s y : T h e ro l e o f a cc u ra c y a n d v a ria b ility i n c o n fu s in g i m a g in a ti o n s w i th p e rc e p t u a l e x p e ri e n c es . J o u r n a l o f E x p er i m e n ta l P s y c h o lo g y : H u m a n L e a r n in g a n d M e m o ry , 5 , 2 2 0 ±2 4 0 . J o n e s , C .M ., & H ei t, E . (1 9 9 3 ). A n e v a lu a tio n o f th e t o t a l s im i la rit y p ri n c i p l e: E f fec t s o f s im i la rity o n fre q u e n c y ju d g m e n t. J o u r n a l o f E x p e r im e n ta l P s y c h o lo g y : L e a r n in g , M e m o r y a n d C o g n itio n , 1 9 , 7 9 9 ±8 1 2 . J o n id e s, J ., & J o n e s , C .M . (1 9 9 2 ). D ire c t c o d in g fo r fre q u e n c y o c c u rre n ce . J o u r n a l o f E x p e ri m en ta l P s y c h o lo g y : L e a r n i n g , M e m o r y a n d C o g n it io n , 1 8 , 3 6 8 ±3 7 8 . J o n id e s, J ., &
N a v e h - B en ja m in , M . (1 9 8 7 ). E s tim a ti n g fre q u e n c y o f o cc u rre n c e . J o u r n a l o f
E x p er i m e n ta l P s y c h o lo g y : L e a rn in g , M e m o ry a n d C o g n it io n , 1 3 , 2 3 0 ±2 4 0 . L i n t o n , M . (1 9 8 2 ). T ra n s fo rm a ti o n s o f m e m o ry i n e v e ry d a y l ife . In U . N e is s e r (E d .), M e m o r y o b s e rv e d : R e m e m b e r in g i n n a t u r a l c o n te x t (p p .7 7 ±9 1 ). S a n F ra n c is c o : W .H . F re e m an . M e a n s, B ., & L o ftu s , E . (1 9 9 1 ). W h e n p e rs o n a l h is t o ry re p e a ts i ts e lf. D e c o m p o s in g m e m o ri es fo r re c u rri n g e v e n t s . A p p l ie d C o g n it iv e P s y c h o lo g y , 5 , 2 9 7 ±3 1 8 . M e n o n , G . (1 9 9 3 ). T h e e ffe c ts o f a c ce s s ib ility o f i n fo rm a ti o n in m e m o ry o n ju d g m e n ts o f b e h a v i o ra l fre q u e n c ies . Jo u rn a l o f C o n s u m e r R e s e a rc h , 2 0 , 4 3 1 ±4 4 0 . M e n o n , G ., R a g h u b ir, P ., & S ch w a rz , N . (1 9 9 5 ). A n a cc e s s ib ility ±d i a g n o s t ic ity fra m e w o rk fo r b e h a v i o ra l fre q u en c y ju d g m e n ts : T h e u s e o f re s p o n s e a lt ern a ti v e s v e rs u s ra te o f o c c u rre n c e a s so u rc e s o f in fo rm a t io n . J o u r n a l o f C o n s u m e r R e s ea r c h , 2 2 , 2 1 2 ±2 2 8 .
366
CONRAD, BROWN, CASHMAN
N ei s se r, U . (1 9 8 1 ). J o h n D ea n ’ s m em o ry : A c a s e s tu d y . C o g n it io n , 9 , 1 ±2 2 . N e i s s e r , U . ( 1 9 8 6 ). N e s t e d
stru ctu re
in
a u t o b i o g ra p h i c a l m e m o r y . I n
D .C . R u b i n
( E d .),
A u t o b io g ra p h ic a l m e m o r y (p p .7 1 ±8 1 ). N e w Y o rk : C a m b rid g e U n i v e rsi ty P re s s . N is b e tt , R ., & W il s o n , T . (1 9 7 7 ). T e l lin g m o re th a n w e c a n k n o w : V e rb a l re p o rt s o n m e n t a l p ro c e ss e s . P s y c h o lo g i c a l R e v ie w , 8 4 , 2 3 1 ±2 5 9 . S c h o o le r, J .W ., O h l s so n , S ., & B ro o k s, K . ( 1 9 9 3 ). T h o u g h ts b e y o n d w o rd s : W h e n la n g u a g e o v e rsh a d o w s i n s i g h t. J o u r n a l o f E x p e r im e n ta l P s y ch o lo g y : G en e r a l, 1 2 2 , 1 6 6 ±1 8 3 . S c h w a rz , N ., & B ie n ia s , J . (1 9 9 0 ). W h a t m e d ia te s th e im p a c t o f re s p o n s e a l te rn at iv e s o n fre q u e n cy r ep o rts o f m u n d a n e b e h a v io rs ? A p p lie d C o g n itive P s y c h o l o g y, 4 , 6 1 ±7 2 . S c h w a rz , N ., & H i p p le r, H . (1 9 8 7 ). W h a t re s p o n se s c al e s m a y te ll y o u r re s p o n d e n ts: In fo rm a tiv e f u n c tio n s o f re s p o n se a lt er n a tiv e s. In H . H ip p l er , N . S c h w ar z, & S . S u d m an (E d s .), S o c ia l i n f o r m a tio n p r o c e s s in g a n d s u r ve y m e th o d o lo g y (p p .1 6 3 ±1 7 8 ). N e w Y o rk : S p ri n g e r-V erla g . S c h w a rz , N ., H i p p le r, H ., D e u ts c h , B ., & S t ra c k , F . (1 9 8 5 ). R e s p o n se c a te g o rie s : E ffe c t s o n b e h av io ra l re p o rts a n d c o m p a ra ti v e ju d g m e n t s. P u b li c O p in io n Q u a r te r ly , 4 9 , 3 8 8 ±3 9 5 . S tru b e, G . ( 1 9 8 7 ). A n s w e rin g s u rv e y q u e s tio n s : T h e r o le o f m e m o ry . In H . H ip p le r, N . S c h w a rz , & S . S u d m a n (E d s .), S o c i a l in fo r m a t io n p r o c e s s in g a n d s u r v e y m e th o d o lo g y (p p .8 6 ±1 0 1 ). N e w Y o rk : S p rin g e r-V e rla g . S u d m a n , S ., & B ra d b u r n , N . (1 9 7 4 ). R e sp o n s e e f fe c ts in su r v e ys . S a n F ran c is c o : J o s se y -B a s s. T v e rsk y , A ., &
K a h n e m a n , D . (1 9 7 3 ). A v a i la b i lity : A
h e u ri s tic fo r j u d g in g fre q u e n c y a n d
p ro b a b il ity . C o g n itiv e P sy c h o l o g y, 4 , 2 0 7 ±2 3 2 . V o s s , J .F ., V e re b , C ., & B is a n z , G . (1 9 7 5 ). S ti m u l u s fre q u e n c y ju d g m e n ts an d l at e n c y o f s ti m u l u s f req u e n c y ju d g m e n ts as a fu n c t io n o f c o n s ta n t an d v a ri a b l e re sp o n s e c o n d itio n s . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r im e n ta l P s y c h o lo g y : L e a r n in g , M e m o r y a n d C o g n itio n , 3 , 3 3 7 ±3 5 0 . W a g en a a r, W . ( 1 9 8 6 ). M y m e m o ry : A st u d y o f a u t o b io g rap h i ca l m e m o ry o v e r s i x y e a rs . C o g n i tiv e P s y ch o lo g y , 2 4 , 6 6 6 ±6 7 8 . W h ittle s e a , B .W .A . (1 9 9 3 ). Ill u s i o n s o f fa m il ia rity . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r im e n ta l P s y c h o l o g y: L e a r n i n g , M e m o ry a n d C o g n itio n , 1 9 , 1 2 3 5 ±1 2 5 3 . W il s o n , T .D . (1 9 9 4 ) . T h e
proper
p ro t o c o l : V a l i d i t y
and
c o m p l e t e n e s s o f v e rb a l re p o rt s .
P s y ch o lo g i ca l S c i e n c e , 5 , 2 4 9 ±2 5 2 . W ri g h t, D .B ., G a sk e ll, G .D ., & O ’ M u irc h e a rt ai g h , C .A . (1 9 9 4 ). H o w m u c h is `Q u ite a b i t’ ? M a p p in g b e tw e e n n u m e ric a l v a lu es a n d v ag u e q u a n ti fie rs . A p p li e d C o g n it iv e P s y ch o lo g y, 8 , 4 7 9 ±4 9 5 .
M E M O R Y , 1 9 9 8 , 6 (4 ), 3 6 7 ±3 8 1
C h a n g e s in th e S u b je c tiv e P r o p e r tie s o f A u to b io g r a p h ic a l M e m o r ie s w ith th e P a s sa g e o f T im e W illia m J. F rie d m a n a n d P a tric ia A . d e W in sta n le y O b e rlin C olle ge , O h io, U SA
T his st u d y w a s a n in v e st ig a tio n of h o w th e su b je c tiv e pr o pe rtie s o f au tob io g ra p hic al m e m or ie s c ha n g e o v e r tim e. O v e r th e 25 w e e ks a fte r T ha n k s giv in g , u n de rg r ad u ate s ra te d th e qu a lity o f th e ir m e m o ries fo r T h an k sg iv ing d in ne r o n th re e g lo ba l sc ale s an d si x o th e r sc a le s r ef er rin g to sp e cific k ind s o f in fo r m a tio n (c o nv e rs atio n s, pe o ple , fo od , a n d clo th in g ). G lo b a l ra tin g s d ec lin ed r ap idly in th e f irst 12 w ee k s b u t sh o w ed little c h a n g e in th e su b se q ue n t 1 2 w e e k s. T h e hig h e st ra tin gs an d th e le a st d e c line w er e f ou n d f o r in fo r m a tion th a t c o u ld b e re c on st ru c te d fr om g e ne r al kn o w le d g e o f T ha n k s giv in g s ( fo o d a n d p eo p le p re se n t). R a tin gs fo r n on -s c he m a tic in f or m a tion sh ow e d p atte rn s o f d e c lin e co n si ste n t w ith p re v io u s s tu die s a n d w ith h um an s’ a bility to d is c rim in a te th e te m p o ra l d ist an c e s o f p as t ev e n ts.
INTRODUCTION P sy ch o log ists h av e lo ng kn o w n th at th e ac cu ra c y of m e m o ries b ec om es p oo re r w ith th e pa ssa g e of tim e . L a bo ra tory re se arc h ha s re p ea ted ly d em o nstra te d forg e ttin g ov e r inte rv a ls ran g in g fro m m inu te s to d a ys (e.g . R ub in & W e nz e l, 1 99 6 ; W ix ted & E b b ese n , 1 9 9 1), an d stu die s o f au to bio g rap h ic a l m e m o ry (e.g . L in to n , 19 7 5 ; R u bin & W en z el, 1 9 96 ; W a g e na aa r, 1 9 86 ) sh o w d e clin es in ac c ura cy o v e r m o n th s a n d y e ars. T h e re is a lso e v id e nc e th a t fo rg e tting b y su rv e y resp o n d en ts sh o w s sim ila r e ffe cts of the p assa g e o f tim e (S ud m an & B rad b u rn, 1 97 3 ). B u t fa r le ss is k n o w n a bo u t c h an g e s in the sub jec tiv e c h ar ac te ristic s o f m e m o ries, suc h as the ir p e rce ive d viv id n e ss o r c om p le te n e ss. T h e pre sen t stu d y is d e sign e d to ad d to o ur k n o w le d ge o f h o w ju d g em en ts o f th e q u ality o f au to bio g rap h ic a l m e m orie s c ha n g e w ith th e pa ssa g e of tim e in th e w e ek s an d m o n th s a fte r ev e n ts o c cu r. Info rm a tio n ab o ut ch a ng e s in th e su b jec tiv e q u ality of m e m o ries w ith th e p assa g e of tim e is im po rtan t fo r su rve y re sea rc he rs, b e ca u se resp o n de n ts
R e q u e s ts fo r re p ri n t s sh o u l d b e se n t to W illia m J . F ri e d m a n , D e p art m e n t o f P s y c h o lo g y , O b e rlin C o lle g e , O b e rli n , O h io 4 4 0 7 4 , U S A . W e w o u ld li k e t o th a n k P a m e la T o n g , E m i ly P e c k h a m , a n d Ju li a n n a K a n g fo r t h e ir a ss i st a n c e in c o l le c tin g t h e d a ta , J u d i B e i n s te i n M i lle r fo r s ta ti st ic a l a d v ic e , a n d G o rd o n W il lis fo r h is c o m m e n ts o n a n ea rl ie r v e rs io n o f th is p a p e r.
Ó
1 9 9 8 P s y ch o lo g y P re s s L td
368
FRIEDMAN AND deWINSTANLEY
pro b a bly en g ag e in m e tac o gn itiv e p ro ce sse s to d ec id e w h e the r th e ir m e m o rie s m e e t so m e criterion o f co n fid e n ce (W illis, R oy sto n , & B erc ini, 1 9 9 1). M em ories ju d g ed to b e v iv id or c om p le te a re m o re lik e ly to be rep o rted th a n th o se in w hic h re sp o n de n ts h a v e little co n fid e n ce . T he m o re re sea rc h ers k no w ab o u t th e tim e co u rse o f th e su b jec tiv e q u a lity o f m e m o ries, th e b e tte r th ey c an de c ide w h a t re ten tio n in te rv als a re to le rab le in the ir surv e y s an d the m o re ac cu ra tely the y ca n m o d el th e c on trib u tio n o f lo w c on fid en c e to o m issio n s a t d iffe ren t re te n tio n in terv a ls. A n o the r k ind o f info rm a tio n freq u e ntly req u ire d in su rv ey s is w h en e ve n ts oc c urre d . L o ftu s an d M a rbu rg e r (19 8 3 ) n ote th at he alth a n d c rim e surv e ys o fte n re q u ire re sp on d en ts to ju dg e w h eth er an e ve n t o cc u rre d d u rin g so m e b o u nd e d te m p o ra l inte rv al (e .g . ``D u rin g the p ast 6 m on th s, d id a ny o n e try to ro b y ou b y usin g fo rc e o r th rea ten ing to h a rm yo u ? ’ ’ [L o ftus & M a rb urg e r, 19 8 3 , p .1 1 5 ]). T h u s im p ro v em en ts in o u r u n de rstan d in g o f h ow pe o ple ju dg e the tim e s o f pa st ev e nts c a n c on tribu te to o ur k n o w le d g e o f h ow th ey resp o n d to su rv ey q ue stio ns. In th e pre se n t stu d y, w e ho p ed to a dd re ss a q ue stio n th at is u n an sw ere d in th e litera ture on m em o ry fo r tim e: w he th er c ha n ge s o v er tim e in the q u ality o f m e m o ries c ou ld p ro vid e in form ation th a t a llo w s p e o ple to ju d ge h ow lo n g a g o som e ev e nt o cc u rre d , in c irc um stan c es in w hic h th ey la ck a de q ua te in fo rm a tio n ab o ut w he n in tim e it o cc u rred . R e ce nt fin d in g s sh ow tha t in situ atio ns in w hic h sub je cts a re u n ab le to lo c alise ev e nts in tim e , d iffe ren tiated an d p a rtially v e rid ica l ju d g em en ts o f distan c es in the p ast c an still be m a d e fo r e ve n ts fro m th e pa st sev e ral m o n ths, bu t th a t te m p o ral d iffe ren tia tion is po o r be y on d a b ou t tw o to fo u r m o n th s (F ried m an , 1 9 9 6). If a sim ilar fu nc tion is fo u n d fo r th e su b jec tiv e q u a lity of m em orie s, this m ig h t b e th e in fo rm atio n th at su bje cts u se to m a ke distan c e ju d g em en ts, as som e th e o rie s o f m e m o ry fo r tim e im ply (F ried m a n , 1 9 9 3). In ad d itio n , to the ex ten t tha t im pre ssio n s o f d ista n c e co n trib u te to ``forw a rd te lesc o p in g ’ ’ (B ra d b u rn , R ip s, & S h ev e ll, 1 98 7 )Ð th e te nd e nc y to u n d ere stim ate th e a g es o f m or e d ista n t ev e n ts an d im p o rt to o -d ista n t ev e nts in to te m p o rally bo u n d ed in terv a ls (see Frie dm a n, 1 9 9 3)Ð tim e c ha n g es in th e qu a lity o f m e m o ries m ay b e re le v an t to u n d erstan d in g th at ph e n om e no n as w e ll. A nu m b er o f a u th o rs h a v e sug g es te d w a ys in w hic h au to b io g rap h ica l m e m o ries se e m to ch a n ge w ith th e pa ssa g e o f tim e . F o r ex a m ple , C on w a y (1 9 9 0) p ro po s ed th a t m o st m em or ie s rem ain viv id fo r so m e p e rio d of tim e b u t lo se th is q ua lity w h e n sim ila r, la te r e v en ts o cc u r. A re late d v ie w is B rew e r’ s (1 9 8 6, 19 9 6 ) su g ge stion th a t a uto b io g ra ph ica l m em or ie s re m ain rea so n ab ly ac cu ra te co p ies o f e ve n ts fo r so m e pe riod o f tim e a fte r th ey oc cu r, b u t w ith th e pa ssa g e o f tim e , sc he m a -b ase d p ro c e sses b e co m e m o re im p o rtan t in re m e m be rin g ev e nts. S im ilarly , T ho m p son , S k o w r on sk i, L a rsen , a n d B e tz (19 9 6 , p .8 ) a rg u e th a t ``m em o r y f o r e v e n ts c h a n g e s o v e r tim e fro m b e in g la rg e ly re p ro du c tiv e to b ein g la rg e ly re co n struc tiv e .’ ’ A m o ng the few fin d ing s rele va n t to c h an g e s o v e r tim e in th e q u ality o f au to bio g ra p h ica l m em o rie s are resu lts fro m T h o m p son ’ s (1 9 82 ) stud y o f
CHANGES IN PROPERTIES OF MEMORIES
369
m e m o ry fo r p erso n al e v en ts (a nd see T ho m p son e t a l., 1 9 9 6, fo r a sum m ary o f su bse q u en t stu d ie s). T h o m p so n a sk ed co lle g e stud e n ts to rec o rd e ve n ts in th eir o w n a n d th eir ro o m m a te s’ liv e s ov e r a 14 -w e ek p e rio d . E a c h d a y fro m M o nd a y thro u gh T h u rsd ay a n u n usu a l ev e n tÐ o n e th a t w ou ld n o t b e ex p ec ted to h a p pe n m o re th an o nc e p e r se m e sterÐ w as re co rde d fo r o ne ’ s se lf a n d o n e’ s ro om m a te. A t th e en d o f th e re co rd in g p e rio d , su b jec ts an d the ir ro o m m a te s w ere p rese nte d w ith the ev e n ts a n d a sk ed to ra te h o w w ell th e y re m e m b e re d th em o n a 1 ±7 sc ale (1 = ba re ly at a ll, 7 = p erfec tly ). T h e re sults (re plo tte d in F ig . 1 in th e resu lts sec tio n ) sh o w ed an e x po n e n tial de c lin e in m e m o ry ra tin gs, w ith a rap id d ec lin e o ve r the first tw o to fo u r w ee k s an d a m ore g ra d u al d ec lin e th e rea fte r. T h e sa m e p attern em erg e d in the late r stu d ie s u sin g this m eth od (T ho m pso n e t a l., 1 9 9 6). T h e p rese n t stud y w a s in te n d ed to p ro v id e sim ilar in fo rm a tio n a b ou t h o w su bje ctiv e pro p e rties o f m e m o rie s c ha n ge w ith th e p assa ge of tim e. W e also attem p ted to a dd to T h om p so n’ s (1 9 8 2 ; T h o m p so n e t al., 1 9 96 ) fin d in g s in sev e ral w a ys. F irst, w e teste d m o re d iffere ntia te d in fo rm a tio n ab o u t th e qu a lity o f m em o rie s. In stea d of a sin g le , g lob a l ra tin g , w e a sk ed fo r 1 2 d iffe ren t jud g em e nts. T hre e w ere o v e ra ll rating s, a d ap te d fro m Jo h nso n , F o ley , S ue n g as, an d R ay e ’ s (1 9 88 ) stu d y o f re a l a n d im ag in ed ev e n ts. C o rrela tio n s be tw ee n th e thre e m ea su re s allow us to asse ss th e re lia b ility of g lob a l m e m o ry rating s. W e also in clu de d q ue stio n s a b ou t the q u ality o f m em or ie s for se v er al spe c ific asp e cts o f th e rem em b ere d ev e nt, su c h as p e op le , c on v ersa tio n s, a n d c lo th in g. T h e se d ata c a n tell u s w he the r th ere is a sing le tim e p a tte rn o r d iffere nt pa tte rn s for d iffe ren t k in ds o f in fo rm atio n . F urth erm ore , so m e of the asp e cts w ere am en a b le to rec o n stru c tio n , an d oth e rs w e re n ot. C o m p a riso n o f sch e m a -rela te d an d oth er m e m o ries c an she d lig ht on th e c o ntrib utio n o f re co n struc tiv e p ro c esse s to th e q u ality o f m em o rie s. T his issue co u ld o n ly b e e x am in e d ind irec tly in T h o m p so n ’ s stu d ies (b y u sin g g lo b a l ra tin g s of 6 o r 7 to e stim ate m e m o ry fo r d eta il, a n d th e a c cu rac y o f m e m o ry for p eo p le a n d lo ca tio n to estim a te th e c on tribu tion o f re c on stru ction ). S ec o nd , w e in clu d ed rete ntio n in te rv als of u p to a b o ut 1 0 w e ek s lo n g er tha n tho se in T h o m p so n ’ s (1 9 8 2) stu d y . T h is is sig n ific an t for un d ersta n din g th e fun c tio n re lating rating s o f th e q ua lity of m e m o ries to e la p se d tim e , b e ca u se it is n o t c le a r fr o m T h o m p so n ’ s f in d in g s w h e th e r ra t in g s h a v e a p p ro a c h e d asy m pto tic le ve ls a t h is lo ng e st reten tio n in te rv al, ab o u t 1 4 w e ek s. T h o m p so n et a l. (1 9 9 6 ) d id re p ort m e m o ry ratin gs fro m six su b je c ts for lo n g er in terv a ls, ran g in g u p to 90 0 d ay s. B u t th e a u tho rs no te th a t th e sh a pe o f th e fu n ction c ou ld h av e be en in flu en c ed b y th e ra n ge o f a g es o f ev e nts, b e ca u se su b jec ts m ig h t h av e co m pa red th e q u a lity of m em or ie s o f th e ran g e o f a ge s sa m p le d. In o u r stud y , few su bje cts w e re tested are m o re th a n o n e tim e, so re lativ istic use of th e sca le w a s un lik ely . T h ird , w e u se d a targ e t e v en t tha t is esp e cia lly distin ctiv e ; T h a nk sg ivin g d in n er. A lth o u g h T h o m p so n a nd co lle a g ue s re qu ire d th e ir sub je cts to re po rt u nu su a l ev en ts, the re qu ire m e nt fo r se ve ral ev e nts p e r w ee k m ad e it like ly tha t
370
FRIEDMAN AND deWINSTANLEY
m a n y o f th e ev e n ts tha t su bje cts se lec ted w e re relate d to la te r e v en ts th at m ig h t ha v e in terfe red w ith th e targ et e v en ts. F e w e ve n ts rese m b le T h an k sg ivin g din n er, so o ne w ou ld e x p ec t le ss in terfere n ce b y su b seq u en t ex p e rie n ce s. In ad d itio n , be c au se surv e ys o ften sam p le a m ix o f e v en ts ran g in g fro m th e m u n d an e (e.g . filling pre scrip tio n s) to th e h ig h ly salien t (e .g . h o sp ita l sta y s), it is use fu l to see w he th er a fu n ction sim ilar to T h om p so n’ s is fou n d fo r a n e v en t m o re im p o rta n t to re spo n d en ts th a n m o st o f th o se re p o rte d b y h is su b jec ts.
METHOD Subjects and Procedure P articip an ts w er e u n d erg ra du a te s a t a lib e ral a rts co lle g e in th e U nite d S ta te s. O v e r a p e rio d o f n e arly six m o n th s, stu d e nts w ere a pp ro ac h ed in d in in g h alls a n d in th e sn a ck b ar an d a sk ed to fill o u t a b rie f m em o ry su rv e y . A to ta l o f 5 2 8 surv e y s w ere co m p le ted . O n 5 3 o f th e fo rm s, resp o n de n ts in d ica te d h av in g pa rtic ip ated in th e stud y b efo re. O n 3 6 of the fo rm s, resp o n d en ts fa ile d to an sw e r th e qu e stio n ab o u t fo rm e r pa rtic ip a tio n . D a ta w e re co lle c ted a t 1 7 tim e s in th e 2 5 w ee ks fo llo w in g T h a n ksg iv in g (2 3 N o v e m b e r, 1 9 9 5 ), w ith th e e x ce p tio n o f th e in terv a l o f w in te r b rea k . T e stin g w a s a t a p pro x im ate ly w e e kly in terv a ls fo r a b o ut the first tw o m on ths a n d biw ee k ly in te rv als the rea fter. T h e m ea n nu m b e r of d ay s a fte r T h an k sg ivin g (ra n g es in p a re n th e se s) for th e 17 tim e s w e re : 5 (5 ), 7 (7), 1 4.8 7(1 4 ±15 ), 20 .0 2 (1 9 ±21 ), 47 .9 7 (4 7 ±4 8 ), 69 .2 8 (6 0 ±7 1 ), 7 7 .3 6 (7 6±7 8 ), 8 3 (8 3), 8 9.7 7 (8 7 ± 9 1 ), 9 8 . 7 3 (9 7 ±1 0 0 ),1 0 4 .6 5 (1 0 1 ±1 0 5 ) , 1 1 1 .8 6 (1 1 1 ±1 1 2 ), 1 1 7 .0 0 (1 1 5 ±1 1 8 ), 13 2 .0 3 (1 3 2±1 3 3), 14 5 (14 5 ), 1 5 9(1 5 9 ), an d 1 75 (1 7 5). T h e n u m b e rs o f fo rm s co m ple te d at th e 1 7 te stin g tim e s w ere : 3 0 , 4 3, 5 2 , 5 9 , 3 0, 3 9 , 2 8 , 25 , 26 , 1 5 , 20 , 29 , 28 , 3 0 , 2 8 , 2 4 , a nd 2 2.
Survey Instrument T h e m a in d ata c om e fro m a T h a nk sg iv in g m em o ry su rv ey . A ll su b je c ts tes te d after 7 F e b rua ry , 1 9 96 , also c o m p le ted a sim ilar fo rm pe rta in in g to ``a d inn e r [a tte n d ed ] o v er W in ter b re a k . . . [or] w in te r e v en t’ ’ , an d w ere ask e d to in dic ate th e ty pe a n d d ate o f the e v en t. T h e o rde r o f th e tw o fo rm s w as co u nte rb a lan c ed . O n th e T h an k sg iv in g m e m o ry surv e y, resp o n d en ts w ere a ske d the ir na m e , th e da te , an d w he the r the y h a d pa rtic ipa ted in th e stu dy b efo re . T h e y th en m ad e ch e ck m a rk s ind ica ting the ir re sp o nse s to th e 13 q u estio n s liste d in T ab le 1 . A ll bu t qu e stio n 13 h ad b elo w th em pla ce s for the resp o n ses : 1 , 2, 3, 4 , 5 , 6 , o r 7 . Q u e stio n s 1±3 a n d 10 ±1 2 w e re a d ap te d fro m Jo hn so n e t a l.’ s (1 98 8 ) M e m o ry C h a rac teristic s Q u e stio n na ire. T h e first th ree are g lo ba l ra tin g s o f m em o ry fo r th e e v en t. Q u estion s 1 1 a n d 1 2 a llo w us to a dd re ss p o ssib le re h e arsa l e ffe cts. Q u e stio n 1 0 (c o nc e rn in g ad eq u a cy o f th e m e m o ry ) w a s n ot in clu de d in o u r an a lyse s, b ec au se pa rtic ip a nts rep o rted th at o ur ve rsio n of the q u estio n w a s
CHANGES IN PROPERTIES OF MEMORIES
371
TABLE 1 The Survey Instrument P l e a s e R a t e Y o u r M e m o ry o f T h a n k s g i v in g D in n e r 1 . M y o v e ra ll m e m o ry fo r th e d i n n e r i s ``1 ’ ’ d im to ``7 ’ ’ s h a r p . 2 . T h e o v e ra ll v iv id n e s s o f m y m e m o ry i s `` 1 ’ ’ v a g u e to ``7 ’ ’ v e r y vi v id . 3 . M y m em o ry fo r th e d in n e r is ``1 ’ ’ s k et c h y to ``7 ’ ’ v er y d et a i le d . 4 . H o w w el l d o y o u re m e m b er th e c o n v e rs a tio n s th at y o u h ad o v e r t h e c o u rs e o f th e e v en in g ``1 ’ ’ n o t a t a ll t o ``7 ’ ’ v e r y w el l. 5 . F o r h o w m a n y o f y o u r c o n v e rs a tio n s d o y o u re m e m b e r a t le a s t s o m e d et a ils ``1 ’ ’ n o n e to ``7 ’ ’ a l m o s t a ll. 6 . R a te y o u r m em o ry f o r w h o w a s p re s e n t ` `1 ’ ’ v a g u e to ``7 ’ ’ v e r y c le a r . 7 . H o w w e l l d o y o u re m e m b e r w h a t y o u w e re w e a rin g fro m ``1 ’ ’ I h a v e n o m e m o ry o f w h a t I w a s w e a r in g t o ``7 ’ ’ I k n o w e x a c tly w h a t I w a s w e a r in g ? 8 . H o w m u c h d o y o u re m e m b e r ab o u t w h at o th e r p e o p le w e re w e a rin g ? ``1 ’ ’ v e r y l ittle to ``7 ’ ’ I c a n r em e m b e r w h a t m o s t p e o p le w e r e w ea r in g . 9 . M y m em o ry fo r th e fo o d th a t w a s s e rv ed is ``1 ’ ’ s k et c h y to ``7 ’ ’ v er y v iv id . 1 0 . D o y o u h av e a n y d o u b ts a b o u t th e a d e q u a c y o f y o u r m e m o ry fro m ``1 ’ ’ a g re a t d e a l o f d o u b t to ``7 ’ ’ n o d o u b t w h a ts o e v e r. 1 1 . S in c e th e d in n e r (a n d o t h e r t h a n n o w ), h o w m a n y t im e s h a v e y o u th o u g h t a b o u t th e e v e n t fr o m ``1 ’ ’ n e v e r to `` 7 ’ ’ m a n y ti m e s . 1 2 . S in c e th e d in n e r (a n d o th e r th a n n o w ), h o w m a n y t im e s h a v e y o u ta l k e d ab o u t t h e e v en t fro m ``1 ’ ’ n e v e r to `` 7 ’ ’ m a n y ti m e s . 1 3 . D id y o u h a v e T h a n k s g iv in g d in n e r w ith fa m i ly _ _ _ _ in O b e rl in _ _ _ _ O th e r _ _ _ _ .
am b ig u o u s. In the rem a in in g qu e stio n s ca llin g for n u m erica l rating s, p artic ip an ts jud g ed h ow w ell th ey rem em be re d sp ec ific asp ec ts o f th e T h an k sgiv in g d in n e r, inc lud in g c o nv e rsa tio ns, p eo p le , fo o d, an d c lo thin g .
RESULTS Thanksgiving Survey T ota l-m e m o ry R a tin g s. T h e m e an of th e n in e item s re q uiring ra tin g s of th e q ua lity o f m e m o ries (Q u e stio n s 1 ±9 ) w a s u sed a s a first ind e x of to tal-m e m o ry p erfo rm a n ce . T h ese n in e ite m s ha d a C ro n ba c h ’ s a lp h a re lia b ility o f 0 .9 0 . F igu re 1 sho w s th e to ta l-m e m o ry ra tin g s p lo tte d a s a fu n ction o f the n um b er o f w ee k s afte r T h a nk sg ivin g tha t the su rve y w a s c om p le tee d . T ota l rating s ap p ea red to d ec lin e m o st ra pid ly ov e r a bo u t the first 12 w e e k s, w ith no sy stem a tic d ec lin e the rea fter. A po w er fu n ctio n w ith an e xp o n en t o f ± 0 .1 1 fits w e ll th e c u rve fo r 2 tota l m em or y sh o w n in F ig . 1 , S E = .0 2 , R = .7 6 . In th is an d sev e ra l of the c urv e s to b e p res en ted , th ere is a d ip in rating s a t a bo u t 1 4 w ee k s th at w e h a v e b ee n u na b le to e x pla in , o th e r tha n b y c h an c e differe n ce s in so m e p a rtic ip a nts’ u se o f the sc ale , m a gn ifie d b y th e sm a ll sa m p le size fo r o n e of th es e po ints. T o co n du c t a sig n ific an c e te st th a t m ee ts th e a ssum ptio n of in d ep e nd e n ce , w e teste d th e fit
372
FRIEDMAN AND deWINSTANLEY
FIG. 1.
M e a n ra tin g s a s a fu n c tio n o f w e e k s si n c e th e e v e n t fo r a ll n in e m e m o ry i te m s (T o t al
m em o ry ) o n th e T h an k sg iv in g s u rv e y , a n d o v e ra ll m e m o ry in T h o m p s o n ’ s (1 9 8 2 ) s tu d y .
of a p o w er fun c tio n to in d iv id u al su b jec ts’ d ata ra the r th a n the m e an s for ea c h te sting tim e . O nly su bje cts w h o re p orted n o t h a v in g p artic ipa te d b efo re w e re in c lu d e d in th is a n aly sis. P o w e r fu nc tio n s sim ila r to tho se th at fit the gro u p d ata w e re sign ific a n t be y on d th e .0 0 01 le ve l b y m u ltip le re g ressio n in th is a nd th e sub se q u en t an aly ses . F ig u re 1 a lso in c lu d e s a p lo t o f m e m o ry rating s fro m T h o m p so n’ s (1 9 8 2 ) dia ry stud y . A p o w e r fu nc tio n w ith a n e xp o n en t o f ± 0 .1 8 pro v id e s an e x ce llen t 2 fit to th e se d ata , R = .9 9 . T h e sm o o th e r c u rv e an d b e tte r fit in T h o m p so n’ s d ata are v e ry lik e ly d u e to the fa ct th a t rete ntion inte rv a l w as a w ith in -su b jec t va ria b le in h is stu d y, an d to p a rtic ipa n ts’ a bility to lea rn to u se th e sc ale co n siste n tly b y m a k ing m an y jud g e m e n ts. T h e tw o c u rve s sh o w n ea rly id en tica l v a lue s a t re te n tio n in t erv a ls o f a b o u t o n e -h a lf w e ek , a n d b o th su g g e st de c ele rating ra te s of d ec line w ith th e p a ssag e o f tim e (re fle c te d in the ex p o ne n ts of ± 0 .1 1 an d ± 0.1 8). B u t as th e d iffe re n ce s in th e ex p o ne n ts su g ge st, ra tin g s in T h o m p so n ’ s stud y d e cline m o re ra pid ly an d a p pro a ch a n a sym p tote tha t is lo w e r in v a lu e th an th os e in th e p res en t stu d y . Ite m C luste rs. M u ltidim e nsio na l sc a lin g (M D S ) a sse ssed the dim e n sion a l stru c tur e o f th e in te rco rre la tion s a m o n g th e n in e sca le ite m s. A m etric
CHANGES IN PROPERTIES OF MEMORIES
373
m u ltid im e n sio n a l a n aly sis, u sing th e S P S S v ersio n of th e A L S C A L p ro gra m , y ie lde d a on e -d im en sion a l so lu tion w ith a stress va lue o f 0 .1 9 (S tre ss F o rm u la 1 ; 1 K rusk a l & W ish , 19 7 8 ) a n d a cc o u nte d fo r 8 8 % o f the v a ria n c e. T h e tw o d im e n sio n a l s o lu tio n sh o w e d a n im p ro v e m e n t o v e r th e o n e -d im e n sio n a l so lu tio n , w ith a stre ss va lu e o f 0 .0 6, a n d a cc o u n te d fo r 9 8 % o f th e v arian c e. T h e sc a tte r p lot o f th e lin e ar fit for d isp a rity v e rsu s d ista n ce sho w e d a n ap p ro p ria te ly sm o o th a n d inc rea sin g lin ea r fu nc tion . F ig u re 2 is a g rap h ica l d ep iction o f th e co n fig u ra tio n o f ite m s fro m the tw o -d im e n sion a l so lutio n. B a se d on th e c lu sterin g o f ite m s sho w n in F ig . 2 , fiv e in d ic e s w e re g ro up e d tog e th e r fo r fu rth er a n aly sis. F o od a nd p eo p le ra tin g s (Q u e stio n s 9 a nd 6 ) w ere co m bin e d in to o n e in d e x, w h ic h w e refe r to a s sch e m a -rela te d ev e nts, be c au se the se ite m s o f in fo rm a tio n se em esp e cia lly su sce p tib le to rec o n stru c tio n for a T h a nk sg iv in g d inn e r. S h a rp n e ss, v iv id n es s, a n d de tail (Q ue stion s 1 ±3 ) w ere co m bin e d in to a no th er in d e x, w h ic h w e ca lle d g lob a l m e m o ry . Q ua lity o f m e m o ry for c o nv e rsatio ns an d nu m b er o f co n v ersa tio n s rem em b ere d (Q u e stio n s 4 an d 5) w e re c o m b in e d in to a th ird in d e x c a lle d c o nv e rsatio ns . R ating s o f o th e rs’ clo th ing (Q u e stio n 8 ) an d rating s o f o n e’ s o w n c lo thin g (Q ue stio n 7 )
FIG. 2
1
C lu s te rs o f t h e n in e m e m o ry ra ti n g s i n a t w o -d im e n si o n a l sc a l in g s o lu ti o n .
O u r d a ta w e re t o o s k e w e d to m e et a ss u m p tio n s o f fa c to r a n a ly s is . I n a d d i tio n to th e m e tr ic M D S
a n a l y s is re p o rt e d h e re , w e c o n d u c te d a n o th e r M D S a n a ly s is a s su m in g o rd in al , ra t h e r th a n in te rv a l, s c al e s. T h is p ro d u c ed t h e s a m e re s u l ts b u t is n o t re p o rte d i n d e t a il b e c a u s e o u r s am p le s iz e w a s m a rg i n a l fo r th is te c h n i q u e .
374
FRIEDMAN AND deWINSTANLEY
re p re sen ted th e fo u rth a n d fifth in dic es, resp e ctiv ely . A ltho u g h m e m o ry fo r oth e rs’ c loth in g fell in th e se c on d q ua d ran t w ith co n v ersa tio n rating s, th e distan c e b e tw e en c lo th ing rating s a nd c on v er sation rating s w a s sim ila r to th e distan c e s b e tw e e n c on v e rsation s a nd a ll oth e r in dic es; thu s, w e d e cid ed n o t to gro u p oth ers’ c lo th ing w ith co n v ersa tio n s. F ig u r e 3 sh o w s t h e f iv e n e w d i m e n s io n s Ð sc h e m a , g lo b a l m e m o r y , co n ve rsa tio n s, su bje ct’ s c loth in g, a n d o th e rs’ c lo th in g Ð p lo tte d b y w e e ks sinc e T h a n ksg ivin g . T his fig u re re ve als q u ite d iffe ren t fun c tio n s. S ch e m a ha d th e hig h est v alu es a n d th e lea st d e clin e o f an y of the m e a sure s, p o w e r ex p o ne n t = ± 2 0.0 7, S E = .0 1 , R = .7 5 . T he cu rv e fo r g lo ba l m em or y sh o w s lo w e r m e m o ry ra tin g s at ea c h re te n tio n in te rv a l b u t is sim ilar in sh ap e to the c u rve for sc he m a , 2 ex p on e n t = ± 0.1 1, S E = .0 2, R = .5 7 . S u b je c t’ s c lo th in g h ad v alu e s a p p ro a c hin g th o se o f sc h em a an d g lo ba l m em ory fo r th e sh orte st rete ntio n inte rv als, bu t it sho w e d th e g re atest d ec lin e w ith th e p a ssag e of tim e, e x p on e n t = ± 0.2 2 , 2 SE = .0 4 , R = .6 8. C o n ve rsa tio n s w e re th e fou rth b e st rem em b e re d at sho rt re ten tio n inte rv a ls, an d ra tin g s ag a in d ec lin ed su b sta n tia lly w ith th e p assa g e o f 2 ti m e , e x p o n e n t = ± .1 4 , S E = .0 3 , R = .6 7 . F i n a ll y , o th e r s ’ c l o t h i n g w a s distinc tiv e in b ein g th e w orst re m e m b e red Ð ratin gs fell n ea r th e m id p o in t o f
FIG. 3.
M e a n rat in g s fo r th e f iv e i te m c lu st e rs a s a fu n c ti o n o f w e e k s s in c e t h e e v en t.
CHANGES IN PROPERTIES OF MEMORIES
375
the sca le ev e n a t th e sh o rte st re te n tio n in terv a l. H o w ev e r, it a lso sho w e d fu rth e r d ec lin e w ith the p assa g e o f tim e , a nd its tim e c ou rse g e ne ra lly fo llow e d a n 2 ex p o ne n tia l de c ay fu nc tio n , e xp o n e nt = ± 0 .1 5 , S E = .0 4 , R = .5 1 . R e lia bility o f G lo b a l R a tin g s. W e ex a m in ed th e c orre la tio n s b e tw e en th e thre e g lo b al rating s sca les to see w h e th e r g lob a l ratin gs o f the q u a lity o f m e m o ry , sim ila r to th ose u se d in T h o m p so n ’ s stu d ie s (1 9 82 ; T h om p so n e t al., 1 99 6 ), a re re lia b le. D e sp ite the d iffe ren t term s use d (d im /sh a rp , v ag u e /v iv id , an d sk etch y /v ery de tailed ), th e th ree w ere stron g ly c orre lated . R a tin gs o n Q u estio n 1 w ere h ig h ly c o rrelate d w ith th o se o n Q u estio n 2 (r = 0 .8 6 ) an d Q ue stio n 3 (r = 0 .8 9 ). Q u e stio n s 2 a n d 3 w e re also h igh ly c orre lated (r = 0 .8 6). T his pa tte rn su gg e sts tha t th e d iffe ren t g lob a l-m e m o ry q ue stio n s w e re ta p pin g a sim ila r q ua lity o f m em or ie s. Influe n c es on M e m o ry R a tin g s. In a d d ition to ask in g su b je cts to rate th eir m e m o ry fo r T h a nk sg iv in g o n 1 0 ite m s, w e a sk ed su b jec ts to ra te th e nu m b er o f tim es th at the y talk ed a bo u t th e ev e nt, th e nu m b er o f tim e s th a t th e y th o ug h t ab o u t th e e ve n t, w h eth er th ey h ad p artic ipa te d in th e su rv ey b efo re, an d th e loc atio n o f th e e ve n t. T h e im p a ct o f the se v a ria ble s on th e m e m o ry ra tin g s w a s asse sse d usin g a n o n-p a ram etric c orre lation p roc e d ure (Sp e a rm a n’ s R h o ). A lth o u gh w e w o u ld h a v e p refe rred to u se the m o re po w e rfu l p ara m e tric statistic s, se ve ral o f the m e m o ry ind ice s w e re e x tre m e ly sk e w ed . T h e sta n da rd erro r o f th e sk ew ra n ge d fro m ± 1 .6 3 for sch e m a ra tin g s to .8 0 fo r ra tin g s o f o th e rs’ c loth in g. T h u s, w e c o n sid e red the n on -p a ra m e tric tests a p ru de n t ap p ro ac h . T a b le 2 sho w s S pe a rm a n’ s R h o co rrelatio n c oe ffic ie nts. In o rd e r to u se S pe a rm a n’ s R ho to co rrela te th e p la c e o f the ev en t w ith the m e m o ry in dic es,
TABLE 2 Correlation Coefficients P la c e
P a r ti c ip a te
T a lk e d A b o u t
Th o ug ht A bo u t
(1 = H o m e , 2 = O th e r )
(0 = N o , 1 = Y es )
4 3 7 ±4 3 8
4 3 8 ±4 3 9
4 3 1 ±4 3 2
4 9 0 ±4 9 1
T o ta l M e m o ry
0 .5 3 ²
0 .5 5 ²
S u b j e ct ’ s C lo th in g
0 .3 6 ²
0 .3 4 ²
±0 .0 2
0 .0 4
O th e r’ s C l o t h i n g
0 .3 9 ²
0 .4 0 ²
0 .0 6
±0 .0 3
S c h e m a -re l a te d
0 .3 4 ²
0 .3 4 ²
±0 .0 6
±0 .0 4
C o n v e rs ati o n s
0 .5 0 ²
0 .5 3 ²
0 .0 5
±0 .0 9 * *
G lo b a l M em o ry
0 .4 8 ²
0 .5 0 ²
0 .1 5 * * * *
±0 .1 5 * * * *
M em o r y In d ic e s N
0 .0 8 *
±0 .0 9 *
S p e a rm an ’ s c o rre l a tio n s b e tw e e n th e m e m o r y in d ic e s a n d th e p l a ce o f t h e e v e n t s, w h e th e r s u b je c ts p a rt ic ip a te d i n th e s u rv e y , an d n u m b e r o f tim e s s u b je c ts ta lk e d a b o u t a n d t h o u g h t a b o u t th e e v e n t . T w o -ta il e d s ig n if ic a n c e l e v e l s fo r a ll a n al y s e s , ² P < .0 0 0 1 , * * * * P < .0 0 1 , * * * P < .0 1 , * * P < .0 5 , * P < .1 0 .
376
FRIEDMAN AND deWINSTANLEY
w e first dic h o to m ise d th e v a ria ble , g ro up ing fo r c o m p a riso n s th e la st tw o ca teg o rie s (i.e . sch o o l an d o th er). F o r all c orre lation s (e x ce p t th e o n es in v o lv in g pa rtic ip atio n ), o nly th e d a ta fro m su b je cts w h o ind ica ted th a t th ey ha d n o t pre v io u sly pa rtic ip a te d in th e su rv ey w ere use d . F re q ue n c y of ta lk in g ab o u t an d thin k in g a bo u t T ha n k sg iv ing w e re bo th asso c iated w ith h ig h e r ra tin g s fo r to ta l m e m o ry a n d ea c h o f th e fiv e item clu sters. P lac e w h e re T h a n ksg iv in g w as c ele bra ted w as a v e ry w e ak in flu en c e o n m e m o ry ratin g s, b u t th e sig n ific an t co rrela tio n fo r g lo b a l m em ory sh o w ed tha t pa rtic ip an ts w h o c ele b ra ted th e h o lid a y in a n a ty p ica l lo ca tio n re p o rte d h igh e r ra tin g s o f th eir m e m o ry . Fin ally , p rev io u s pa rtic ip ation in the su rv ey h a d little in flu en c e o n m e m o ry ra tin g s, w ith su bje cts w h o re p orted h av in g co m p le te d qu e stio n n aires b e fo re sho w in g slig h tly lo w e r ra tin g s o n se v era l in dic es. It m a y be th at th ere w as an e x ag g e ration in th e a m ou n t o f de c lin e in th e qu a lity o f m e m o ries b y su bje c ts w h o w ere c u ed to the pa ssa ge of tim e b y th eir p rev io us pa rtic ip atio n .
Winter Holiday Survey A to tal o f 1 6 1 p artic ip an ts co m ple te d a sim ilar q u estio n na ire fo r a w inte r ho lid a y e ve n t a n d p ro v ide d a d a te fo r th e e v en t. E v en ts w ere g ro u p ed in to 1 0 re ten tio n in terv a ls ra n g in g fro m 6 to 1 9 w e e ks. F igu re 4 sh ow s th e to ta l-m e m o ry sco re s fo r the w inte r ho lid a y surv e y a n d th e T h a nk sg ivin g surv e y a s a fu n ctio n of n um b er o f w e ek s sin c e th e ev e nt. W ith o n ly a b ou t ha lf a s m an y sub jec ts p e r da ta p o int, th e cu rv e fo r the w in te r h o lid a y da ta is m o re erra tic th a n th e c u rve fo r th e T h a nk sg iv in g su rv e y . H o w e v e r, it a p pe a rs th at th ere is little d iffe ren c e be tw e e n th e tw o c urv e s. M a n y h o lid a y ce le bra tio n s o c cu r in ab o u t th e fiv e w e e k s follo w in g T h a n ksg iv in g , b ut few oc c ur fro m N ew Y e ar th rou g h to th e m idd le o f M a y , w he n th e stud y en d ed . T he re fo re , o ne m ig h t su p p os e th a t if la te r ho lid a y s in te rfe re w ith e arlier o n es a nd if in te rfe ren ce is th e so u rc e o f d e clin es in m e m o ry ra tin g s, th e T ha n ksg iv ing c urv e sh o u ld fall be lo w th e w inte r h o lid a y cu rv e. T h e re is no e vid e nc e th at this is so. W e a lso use d th e w in ter h o lid a y d a ta to c he c k th e ro b u stne ss o f th e m u ltid im e nsio n a l sc alin g so lu tio n th a t e m erg e d fro m th e T h an k sg iv in g da ta. T h e so lu tion for th e w in ter ho lida y su rv ey re su lted in th e clu sterin g o f the item s in to the sa m e five g rou p s. A ga in th e tw o -d im e n sio n al so lu tio n (stre ss = .0 7 , 2 2 R = .9 8 ) w a s su pe rior to th e o n e -d im en sion a l so lu tio n (stres s = .2 3 , R = .8 4 ).
DISCUSSION T h is stu d y w as d esig ne d to p ro v id e in fo rm ation a bo u t c ha n g es in the q u a lity o f m e m o ries for T h a nk sg iv in g d inn e r o v er a pe rio d of ab o u t six m o n th s fo llow in g th e e ve n t. P articip a nts m ad e th re e g lo ba l ra tin g s a n d a lso ju d g e d th eir m e m o rie s fo r se v era l sp e cific a sp ec ts of th e d inn e r. T h e re sults sh ow e d ex p o ne n tia l de c lin e s in the q u ality o f m e m o rie s ov e r th is in terv a l, just a s p ast stud ies usin g
CHANGES IN PROPERTIES OF MEMORIES
FIG. 4.
377
M e a n ra tin g s fo r to ta l m e m o ry i n t h e w in te r h o l id ay s u rv e y a n d t h e T h a n k s g iv in g s u rv e y a s
a fu n c ti o n o f w e e k s s in c e t h e e v en t.
sim ila r re ten tio n in te rva ls (e .g . S u dm a n & B rad b u rn , 19 7 3 ; a nd se e R ub in & W e n ze l, 1 9 96 ) h a ve sh ow n e x po n e ntia l d e cline s in pro p o rtio ns of e ve n ts rec alled o r rec o g n ise d . T he e xp o n e nts o f p ow e r fun c tio n s d esc rib in g th e tem po ra l p a tte rn in th e pre se nt stu d y w e re a bo u t ± 0 .1 0 fo r th e c o m p o site of all rating s a nd fo r th e m e an o f th e glo ba l rating s. T h ese e xp o n e nts are so m e w ha t sm a lle r th a n the ex p o ne n t d esc rib in g ov e ra ll m em o ry for d aily e v en ts in T h o m p so n ’ s (1 9 82 ) stu d y , ± 0 .1 8 . T h e sm a lle r e x po n e nts in th e p re se n t stu d y m a y re flec t a co n trib ution o f sch em at ic k n o w le d g e a bo u t T h an k sg ivin g to p artic ipa n ts’ c o nfid e nc e in th e c om p le ten e ss of th e ir m em orie s. A se p ara te p lo t o f th e tim e co u rse of m em ory fo r fo o d an d for th e p e o ple p re se nt sh ow e d rela tiv e ly hig h ratin g s thro u g ho u t th e tim e p eriod sa m p led a nd less d e cline tha n o th e r d im e nsio n s, ex p o ne n t = ± 0.0 7. W e pre su m e th a t m o st su b jec ts c ou ld rec o nstru c t m u c h o f th e in fo rm a tio n a b ou t th e m en u a n d w h o w as p re se nt from eith er ty pic al T h an k sg iv in gs o r re m e m b e rin g th at th e y c eleb ra te d the e ve n t w ith the ir frie n ds a t co lleg e . T h e e xp o n en ts fo r n o n-s ch e m a tic in fo rm ation in th e p re se nt stu d y a ll fe ll in th e ra ng e o f ± 0 .1 4 to ± 0.2 2, a ll qu ite sim ila r to th e v a lu e o f - 0 .1 8 fou n d in T ho m pso n ’ s (1 9 8 2 ) stu d y .
378
FRIEDMAN AND deWINSTANLEY
D esp ite th e d iffere nc e s be tw ee n T h o m p so n ’ s an d o ur g lob a l ratin g s in ra te o f d ec lin e , th e g e ne ral sim ila rity in th e tim e co u rse is strik ing g iv e n th e m an y d iffe ren c es b etw ee n th e tw o stud ies. It ap p ea rs th at th e o v era ll qu a lity o f m e m o rie s fo r pe rso na l e ve n ts d ec line s ra pid ly in th e w ee k s fo llo w in g th eir o cc u rre n c e a nd th at th e cu rv e s h a ve flatten e d su b stan tially b y ab o u t 1 2 w e e k s. T he se fin d in g s su g g est th a t w h e n p eo p le resp o n d to su rv e y q ue stio n s ab o u t life e ve n ts, th ey a re lik e ly to b e e sp ec ially co n fid e n t in th e ir m e m o ries fo r e v en ts from th e pa st w ee k , an d th at d e clin e s in c on fide n c e m a y b e su b stan tial in th e e nsu in g w e e ks. H o w e ve r, it is like ly th at the re is little fu rth er d e cre ase from thre e m o n th s to six m o n th s in c o nfid en c e in m e m o rie s fo r ev e nts. T h e te m p o ral pa tte rn s fo u n d fo r q u ality o f m em orie s in th is a n d T h om pso n ’ s (1 98 2 ) stud y a re g e ne rally co n siste n t w ith th o se fou n d for th e om issio n of ev en ts in su rve y s of co n su m e r p u rch a se s o r sic k d ay s. S u d m a n an d B rad b u rn (1 97 3 ) rep o rte d th a t the p ro p ortion o f d oc u m e n te d e v en ts in th e p ast th a t are a c tu a lly rep o rte d d e clin es in a m a n n er d e scrib ed b y e x po n e n ts b e tw e e n ab o u t ± .0 5 to ± .1 0 fo r re ten tio n in terv a ls ra ng ing u p to th ree m o nth s to nin e m on th s. In a ll c ase s th e re is a p eriod o f rap id d e cline , w ith slo w e r ra tes o f de c lin e th ere af te r. T he se fu n ctio ns m ay b e h e lp fu l w h e n su rve y rese arc h ers n ee d to asse ss the co st in m isse d or po o rly re m em be re d ev e nts o f sa m pling ta rge t e ve n ts from d iffe ren t d ista nc e s in the p ast: th e c o st d o es n o t inc re ase lin ea rly w ith in cre asin g ly lon g rete ntio n in terv als. T h e fin din g s o f th e p re se nt stu d y a re also n o ta b le b ec au se th ey pro v ide info rm ation a b ou t th e c u es th a t resp o nd e nt s co u ld use w h en a n sw erin g q ue stio n s a bo u t th e te m p o ral d ista nc e s of p a st e ve n ts. W h e n re sp on d e nts a re a ble to rec o n stru c t the tim e s o f p ast ev e n ts, th e fu nc tio n re latin g e stim a ted tim e to th e true re ten tio n in terv a l is u sua lly lin e ar (e .g . th e ne w s e v en t c o nd ition in F r ie d m a n & H u tte n l o c h e r ’ s , 1 9 9 7 , stu d y ) . H o w e v e r , w h e n d e p r iv e d o f info rm ation th at ca n a llo w the re co n stru ctio n o f th e tem po ra l lo c atio n s o f p ast e ve n ts, p o w e r fun c tio n s p ro v id e a b etter fit th an lin ea r fu n ction s (F rie dm a n , 1 9 96 ). T h ese p ow e r fun c tio n s an d tho se de scr ib in g d e clin e s in th e q u ality o f m e m o rie s in th e p rese n t stu d y a ll sh o w a sim ila r tim e c ou rse ; rela tiv ely ra pid c ha n ge ov e r a p e rio d o f a b o ut tw o to th re e m on th s, w ith little ch a ng e th ere af te r. T hu s, th e pre sen t fin d ing s in dic ate th a t te m p o ral ch a n ge s in th e pe rce iv ed q u ality o f m e m orie s p ro v ide a p lau sib le m e c ha n ism fo r a llo w in g p eo p le to ju dg e the d ista nc e s o f e v en ts in the p ast. If ch a ng e s in the q u alitie s of m em orie s d o e x pla in th e tem p ora l p ro p erties o f d ista nc e -b ase d tim e ju d ge m e n ts, the y m ay a lso b e a p artia l e x pla na tion o f th e p h en o m e n o n of fo rw ar d te le sc o pin g . T h e re lativ e la c k of d iffere n tia tio n o f th e v iv id ne ss or c om p le te n e ss o f m em or ie s old er th a n se ve ra l m o n ths m a y lea d to a c o m p re s sio n o f s u b je c tiv e d is ta n c e s fo r o ld e r e v e n ts, a s F rie d m a n a n d H u tte n lo c he r (1 9 97 ) fo u nd in th eir stu d y of m em o ry for th e tim es of te lev ision storie s. H o w e v e r, th e q ua lity -of-m em ory fu n ction c an n o t p ro vid e a g en e ral a cc o u nt o f fo rw ar d te lesc o p in g , be c au se th ere is g o o d e vid e nc e th at g u ess in g
CHANGES IN PROPERTIES OF MEMORIES
379
w ith in a p ro b ab le ra n ge of d ate s an d oth er n o n-d istan c e p roc e sses c o ntrib u te to it (H utten lo ch e r, H e d ge s, & B ra db u rn, 1 9 9 0; H u tte n lo c h er, H ed g es, & P roh a sk a, 1 98 8 ; K e m p , 1 9 88 ; R u b in & B ad d e le y , 1 98 9 ; W rig h t, G a sk e ll, & O ’ M uirch e arta ig h , 1 9 9 7). A no the r find ing o f the pre se nt stud y is th at p articip a nts w ere ab le to d iffe re n tia te b etw ee n th e q u a lity o f d iffe re n t asp e c ts o f th eir m em o ry fo r T h a nk sg iv in g d inn e r. T h is w as ev id en t from th e m u ltid im e nsio n a l sca lin g so lu tio n an d fro m a n e xa m in a tio n o f th e tim e fu n ctio n s o f th e d iffe ren t c lus te rs o f ite m s. F ive c lus te rs e m e rg e d from th e sca lin g : a c lu ste r co n sistin g o f the th ree g lo b al m e m o ry ra tin g s, o ne c o nsistin g of fo od an d p e op le p res en t (w h ic h w e b eliev e m ain ly in v o lv e d sc h em atic in fo rm a tio n ), a pa ir o f ite m s re la tin g to co n v ersa tio n s, a n item m e a sur in g w ha t th e pa rtic ipa n t w o re, an d a n item co n c ern ing w h a t o th e rs w o re a t th e d inn e r. T h e c lu sterin g o f the g lo ba l item s sh ow s th a t su bje c ts ca n re lia bly a sse ss th e o ve rall q u ality o f the ir m e m o ry fo r a n ev e n t. B u t the e xiste nc e o f o th e r clu sters sh o w s th a t se v era l o th er p a rtia lly ind e pe n de n t asp e cts o f th e m e m o ry ca n be jud g e d. M ost inte restin g w a s th e fin d ing th at ra tin g s of m em or y fo r foo d a n d fo r p eo p le w e re c lose ly relate d an d sep a rab le fro m a n o th e r see m in g ly p erc ep tu a l ite m of in fo rm atio n: w h at o the rs w ere w ea ring . T h is fin din g w as p rob a b ly n o t d u e to d istinc tive en c o din g p ro c esse s a t th e tim e o f th e d in n er b u t to the u se o f sc he m a tic in form atio n a t th e tim e o f re ca ll. It is n o ta b le tha t th e fo od ±p e op le c lu ster sh ow ed th e h ig he st rating s a nd the lea st d e cline o ve r tim e. T h is is co n siste n t w ith th e ex p e cta tio n tha t in fo rm a tio n tha t ca n be rec o n stru c te d w ill b e m uc h m o re d ura ble tha n info rm a tio n th at m u st be re trie ve d fro m a sp e cific in stan c e. T ho m p son et a l. (19 9 6 ) a nd B rew e r (1 9 86 , 19 9 6 ) h av e arg u e d th a t th e re is a sh ift w ith th e p assa g e o f tim e fro m re p rod u c tiv e , de tailed m e m o ries to rec o nstru ctio n s o f ev e n ts. O ur d ata sh ow th at this tren d is a lso tru e o f th e co n fid e n ce tha t p e op le h av e in th eir m e m o ry fo r d iffe re n t asp e cts o f ev e n ts. H o w e v e r, it sh o u ld b e n ote d tha t e v en rating s o n th e sch e m a tic ite m s de c lin e so m e w h at ov e r a b o ut th e first 1 2 w ee k s, fo llo w e d b y a n ap p are n t le v ellin g -o ff. T h is sh o w s th a t su b je cts are n o t re ly in g e ntire ly o n rec o n stru c tio n in th e ir ra ting s o f m em ory fo r fo o d an d p eo p le ; spe ci fic m em o rie s also co n trib u te to im p re ssio n s o f th e q u ality o f th is info rm a tio n . T h e re m a in in g ty pe s of in fo rm a tion , c o nv e rsatio ns a nd clo th in g , w ere u nlike ly to b en e fit m uc h fro m re c on stru ction a t th e tim e o f re ca ll. A s sug g e ste d ea rlie r, th is m a y b e w h y th e e xp o n en ts d e scribin g th ese c urv e s w e re c lo ser in v alu e to th e o n e from T h o m p so n ’ s (1 98 2 ) d ia ry stud y , w h e re m o st in fo rm a tio n sh ou ld also h av e b ee n d ifficu lt to re co n stru c t. It a p p ea rs tha t the q u ality o f m e m o ry fo r no n -sch e m atic in fo rm a tio n d e clin es rap idly in th e first tw o m on th s an d th at the fu nc tion p lotte d o v er ab o u t six m o n ths is w e ll d e scrib ed b y ex p o ne n ts of ± 0 .1 5 to ± 0.2 0 . B e c au se e lap se d tim e is a co rrela tio n al va riab le, w e c a nn o t te ll w hy q u ality o f-m em or y ra tin g s de clin e in th e w ee k s a nd m o nth s fo llo w in g an e v en t. B u t
380
FRIEDMAN AND deWINSTANLEY
the re a re se ve ral rea so n s to d o u bt th a t sp e cific inte rfe re nc e b y la te r, sim ilar e ve n ts is re sp on sib le. F irst, c o nsid er ab le d e cline s w e re fo u nd in the w ee k s b etw ee n T h a nk sg iv in g an d th e w in ter h olida y s. D u rin g th is tim e stu d e nts w ere o n c am pu s an d oc c up ied w ith fin ish in g the ir se m e ster’ s w o rk ; few w ou ld h a ve e xp e rie n ce d e v en ts sim ilar to T h an k sg ivin g d in n e r. S e co n d , th e re w a s no e vid en c e th at c e le b ratio ns d urin g th e w in ter ho lida y s in la te D ec em b er an d e a rly Ja nu a ry in flu e n ce d su b se q ue n t T h an k sg iv in g ra tin g s. A co m pa riso n b etw e en th e tim e fu nc tio n fo r T h an k sg iv in g rating s a nd th e a na lo go u s plo t for w in te r h olida y ratin g s pro v ide s n o su g g estio n th at T h an k sg ivin g ra tin g s w e re d ispla ce d d o w n w a rd a fte r th e w in te r h o lid ay s. If sp e cific inte rfe re nc e is n o t re sp on sib le fo r d ec lin e s in th e q ua lity o f m em o rie s w ith the pa ssa ge o f tim e , w e a re le ft w ith th e p o ss i b il iti e s t h a t m o r e g e n e r a l in te r f e re n c e , f o r e x a m p l e b y d a i ly e xp e rie n ce s, is resp o n sib le or tha t m e m o rie s ind e p en d en tly c h an g e a s th e y ag e . In a d ditio n to ra tin g th e q u ality o f th e ir m e m o ries, su bje cts re p o rte d ho w freq u en tly th e y th o u g ht a b ou t a nd ta lk e d ab o u t T h an k sg ivin g d in n er. B oth m e a sur es w ere m o d e rately p ositiv e ly c o rre late d w ith th e q u ality -o f-m e m ory ratin g s. T h o m p so n (1 9 8 2; a n d se e T h om p son e t a l., 1 9 96 ) a lso fo un d tha t ho w freq u en tly su b je c ts tho u g h t a bo u t o r ta lk e d a b o ut an ev e nt w as p ositiv e ly rela ted to m e m o ry ratin g s. It m ay b e tha t rea c tiv atio n of m e m o ries co u nte ra c ts th e e ffe cts of g e ne ral in terfere n ce o r intrinsic , tim e -lin k ed p ro ce sse s. H o w ev e r, the se re su lts co u ld a lso b e du e to the fa c t tha t stro ng e r m em o rie s are m ore lik ely to b e th o ug h t ab o u t an d d isc u sse d, o r ev e n th at stren g th is so m etim e s u sed to infe r re h e arsa l fre qu e n cy . In c o nc lusio n , rating s o f th e q u ality o f m em orie s d e cline o ve r th e six m o n ths a fte r a n e ve n t in a m a n n er w e ll d esc rib e d b y p o w e r fu n ctio ns w ith e xp o n e nts ran g in g fro m ± 0 .0 7 to ± 0 .2 2 . T h e v alu es of th e e x p on e n ts de p en d o n th e a spe c ts of th e e v en t th at su b jec ts re c all. Item s o f in fo rm a tio n th at c an b e re c o nstru cted sho w flatter fu n ction s th a n do item s o f in fo rm a tio n tha t are sp ec ific to th e e ve n t. T h e fu nc tio n s o b ta ine d h ere a nd in pre v iou s stu d ie s sh o w th at qu a lity o f m e m o ries co u ld b e th e c ue th at su b je cts u se w he n d ire ctly ju d g in g th e ag e s o f m e m o ries. O ur resu lts h a v e im p lic a tio n s fo r su rve y rese arc h ers c o nc e rne d w ith ho w m e m o ry co n fide n ce ch a ng e s w ith tim e, th e e ffe cts o f th e fre qu e n cy of th in kin g a b ou t a n e ve n t, an d th e kin d s o f tem po ra l in form atio n a v ailab le to re sp on d e nts. T h e re sults also sug g e st th at sc he m a a n d n o n-sc h em a in fo rm a tio n m a y b e ju d g e d by differe nt pro c esse s a nd th at su rv e y s sho u ld b e co n struc ted to in su re a de q u ate sam pling o f b oth typ e s o f in form atio n.
REFERENCES B ra d b u rn , N .M ., R i p s , L .J ., & S h e v el l, S .K . (1 9 8 7 ). A n s w e rin g a u to b i o g ra p h ic a l q u e s t io n s : T h e im p a c t o f m e m o ry a n d in fe re n ce o n s u rv e y s . S c ie n c e, 2 3 6 , 1 5 7 ±1 6 1 . B re w e r, W .F . (1 9 8 6 ) . W h a t i s a u to b io g ra p h i ca l m em o ry ? In D .C . R u b in (E d .), A u to b i o g r a p h ic a l m e m o r y (p p .2 5 ±4 9 ). C a m b rid g e : C a m b rid g e U n i v e rs it y P re s s .
CHANGES IN PROPERTIES OF MEMORIES
381
B re w e r, W .F . (1 9 9 6 ). W h a t i s rec o ll e ct iv e m e m o ry ? In D .C . R u b in (E d .), R e m e m b e r in g o u r p a s t: S t u d ie s in a u to b i o g ra p h ic a l m e m o r y (p p .1 9 ±6 6 ). N e w Y o rk : C a m b rid g e U n i v e rs it y P re s s . C o n w a y , M .A . (1 9 9 0 ). A u t o b io g r a p h i c a l m e m o r y : A n in tr o d u c ti o n . M i lto n K ey n e s, U K : O p en U n iv e rs it y P re s s . F ri ed m a n , W .J . (1 9 9 3 ). M e m o ry fo r th e t im e o f p a s t e v en ts . P sy c h o l o g ic a l B u ll et in , 1 1 3 , 4 4 ±6 6 . F ri ed m a n , W .J . (1 9 9 6 ). D is ta n ce a n d l o c a ti o n p ro c es s e s i n m e m o ry fo r th e tim e s o f p a s t e v e n ts . In D .L . M e d in (E d .), T h e p s y c h o lo g y o f le a r n in g a n d m o tiv a ti o n (V o l. 3 5 , p p .1 ±4 1 ). O rla n d o , F L : A ca d e m ic P re s s . F ri ed m a n , W .J ., & H u tt en lo c h e r, J . (1 9 9 7 ). M e m o ry fo r th e t im e o f ``6 0 M in u t e s’ ’ s to rie s a n d n e w s e v e n ts . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r im e n ta l P sy c h o lo g y : L ea r n i n g , M e m o r y a n d C o g n i tio n , 2 3 , 5 6 0 ±5 6 9 . H u t te n l o c h e r, J., H e d g e s , L .V ., & B ra d b u rn , N .M . (1 9 9 0 ). R e p o rt s o f e la p s e d tim e : B o u n d in g a n d ro u n d i n g p r o c e s se s i n e st im a ti o n . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r im e n t a l P s y c h o lo g y: L e a rn in g , M em o r y , a n d C o g n itio n , 1 6 , 1 9 6 ±2 1 3 . H u t te n l o c h e r, J ., H e d g e s , L .V ., & P ro h a s k a , V . (1 9 8 8 ) . H ie ra rc h ica l o r g a n iz a tio n i n o rd er ed d o m a in s: E s tim a ti n g th e d a te s o f e v e n t s . P s y c h o lo g i c a l R e v ie w , 9 5 , 4 7 1 ±4 8 4 . J o h n s o n , M .K ., F o l ey , M .A ., S u e n g a s , A .G ., & R a y e , C .L . (1 9 8 8 ). P h e n o m en a l c h a ra c te ris tic s o f m e m o rie s fo r p e rc e iv e d a n d i m ag in e d a u to b i o g ra p h ic a l e v e n ts . J o u rn a l o f E x p e r im e n ta l P s y c h o lo g y : G e n e r a l, 1 1 7 , 3 7 1 ±3 7 6 . K e m p , S . ( 1 9 8 8 ). D a t in g re c e n t a n d h is to ric a l e v e n t s. A p p li e d C o g n it iv e P s y c h o lo g y , 2 , 1 8 1 ±1 8 8 . K ru s k a l, J ., & W is h , M . (1 9 7 8 ). M u ltid i m en si o n a l s c a l in g . S a g e U n iv e rs ity P re s s S er ie s o n Q u a n tita tiv e A p p l ic a tio n i n t h e S o c ia l S ci e n c e s , n o . 0 7 ±0 1 1 . B e v e rl y H il ls , C A : S ag e . L i n t o n , M . (1 9 7 5 ). M e m o ry fo r re a l w o rl d e v e n ts . In D .A . N o rm a n & D .E . R u m e lh a rt (E d s.), E x p lo ra tio n s in c o g n it io n (p p .3 7 6 ±4 0 4 ) . S a n F ra n c is c o : F re e m a n . L o ftu s , E .F ., & M a rb u rg e r, W . (1 9 8 3 ). S in ce t h e e ru p t io n o f M t . S t . H e le n s, h a s a n y o n e b e at e n y o u u p ? I m p ro v i n g t h e a c c u ra c y o f re tro s p e c tiv e re p o rts w i th l a n d m a rk e v e n ts . M em o r y a n d C o g n itio n , 1 1 , 1 1 4 ±1 2 0 . R u b i n , D .C ., & B a d d e le y , A .D . (1 9 8 9 ). T el e sc o p in g i s n o t t im e c o m p re s s io n : A m o d e l o f th e d a t in g o f a u to b i o g rap h ic a l e v e n ts . M e m o r y a n d C o g n i tio n , 1 7 , 6 5 3 ±6 6 1 . R u b i n , D .C ., & W e n z el , A .E . (1 9 9 6 ). O n e h u n d re d y e a rs o f fo rg e ttin g : A q u a n t ita ti v e d e sc ri p t io n o f re te n t io n . P s yc h o lo g ic a l R ev i e w , 1 0 3 , 7 3 4 ±7 6 0 . S u d m a n , S ., & B ra d b u rn , N .M . (1 9 7 3 ). E ff ec t s o f t im e an d m e m o ry fa ct o rs o n r es p o n se su rv ey s . J o u r n a l o f th e A m e r ic a n S t a t is tic a l A s s o c i a t io n , 6 8 , 8 0 5 ±8 1 5 . T h o m p s o n , C .P . (1 9 8 2 ). M e m o ry fo r u n iq u e p e rs o n a l e v en ts : T h e ro o m m a t e s t u d y . M e m o ry a n d C o g n itio n , 1 0 , 3 2 4 ±3 3 2 . T h o m p s o n , C .P ., S k o w ro n s k i, J.J., L a rs e n , S .F ., & B e tz , A . (1 9 9 6 ). A u to b i o g r a p h ic a l m e m o r y : R e m e m b er in g w h a t a n d re m e m b e r in g w h e n . M a h w a h , N J : L a w re n ce E rlb au m A s s o ci a te s In c . W a g e n a a r, W .A . (1 9 8 6 ). M y m e m o ry : A s t u d y o f a u to b io g ra p h ica l m e m o ry o v e r si x y e a rs . C o g n itiv e P s y c h o l o g y, 1 8 , 2 2 5 ±2 5 2 . W i llis, G .B ., R o y s t o n , P ., &
B erc i n i , D . (1 9 9 1 ). T h e u s e o f v e rb al re p o rt m e th o d s i n th e
d e v e lo p m e n t an d te s tin g o f s u rv e y q u e s ti o n n ai re s . A p p li e d C o g n it iv e P sy c h o l o g y , 5 , 2 5 1 ±2 6 7 . W i x t ed , J .T ., & E b b es e n , E .B . (1 9 9 1 ). O n t h e fo rm o f fo rg et ti n g . P s y ch o lo g i ca l S c i en c e , 2 , 4 0 9 ± 41 5. W ri g h t, D .B ., G a s k e ll, G .D ., & O ’ M u ir ch e art a ig h , C .A . (1 9 9 7 ). T e m p o ra l e s ti m at io n o f m a jo r n e w s e v e n ts : R e -e x a m i n in g t h e a c c e ss i b ility p ri n c ip le . A p p li e d C o g n it ive P sy c h o l o g y, 1 1 , 3 5 ±4 6 .
M E M O R Y , 1 9 9 8 , 6 (4 ), 3 8 3 ±4 0 6
T h e S tr u c tu r e o f A u to b io g r a p h ic a l M e m o r y a n d th e E v e n t H isto r y C a le n d a r : P o te n tia l Im p r o v e m e n ts in th e Q u a lity o f R e tr o sp e c tiv e R e p o r ts in S u r v e y s R o b e rt F . B e lli U n ive rsity o f M ic h ig a n , U S A
T his p a p e r r e vie w s th e lite ra tu r e o n th e st ru ctu re of a uto b io g r ap h ic a l m e m o ry a nd po ints to th e u se o f e v en t hist o ry c ale nd a rs as a su r ve y m e th o do log y th a t r e flec ts th is s tr u c t u r e . A u to b i o g r a p h ic a l m e m o r y s tr u c tu r e is c h a r a c te r is e d a s a n hie ra rc h ic a l n e tw o rk th a t in clu de s ex ten d ed , s um m a ris e d, a nd sp e c ific e ve n ts , an d th at p e rm its re trie v al o f p a st e ve n ts th ro ug h m ultip le p a th w ay s tha t w o rk to p± do w n in th e h ie r ar ch y , se q ue n tially w ithin life th e m es th at un ify e xte n d e d e ve n ts , an d in p ar a llel ac r o s s life th em es th at inv o lv e co n te m p or a ne o us an d se q ue n tia l e v e n ts . T r a d itio n a l s u r v e y q u e s tio n s t e n d t o s e g m e n t r e l a te d a s p e c t s o f au tob io g ra p hic al e v e n ts fr om o ne a n o the r , a n d do n o t r ef le c t th e in te rr e la te d n e s s of e ve n ts as in d ic a te d w ithin th e st ru c tu re o f a u to bio g r a ph ic a l m em or y. In c on tra st , ev e n t h is to ry c ale n d a rs d o p ro m o te se q ue n tia l a n d p a ra lle l r etriev a l w ith in th e au tob io g ra p hic al m e m o ry n etw o r k . B y r e flec tin g th e str u ctur e of au tob io g ra p hic al m e m or y , th e u se of e v e nt hist or y c a le nd a rs h a s c o n s id er a ble p ote ntia l in a ss is ting re sp o nd e n ts to r ec o n str u ct th e ir p e rs on a l pa s ts m o re c o m p le te ly an d a c cu ra tely , m a xim is in g th e q u a lity o f re tro sp e ctiv e r ep o rts.
INTRODUCTION T h e qu a lity o f surv e y re sea rch is fu n d am en tally d e p en d en t on th e va lid ity o f resp o n d en t rep o rts, inc lud in g th e ab ility o f resp o n de n ts to a cc u ra te ly re p ort o n the ir p ast b e ha v iou rs, o r ev e n ts th a t th e y h av e w itn e sse d. S u rve y re sea rch e rs h av e be e n aw a re th at p sy ch o log ica l rese a rc h o n au tob io g ra p h ic a l m em o ryÐ tha t is, m e m o ry of o n e’ s p erso n al p astÐ is re lev an t to th eir go a ls o f un d e rsta n din g erro rs th a t ha v e be en o b serv e d in the ir re sp o n de n ts’ re tro sp e ctive re po rts (e.g . S ch w a rz & S u d m a n, 19 9 4 ). E rro rs ha v e b ee n fo u n d in pe o ple ’ s re p o rting o f w ha t, w he n , an d h o w often ev e n ts h av e h a pp e ne d (Jo b e , T o u ra n g ea u , & S m ith, 1 9 9 3 ). B as e d o n u n d e rs ta n d in g th e n a tu r e o f a u to b io g ra p h ic a l m em o ry , ex p lan a tio n s for th es e e rro rs h a v e b e en so u g ht w ith th e ultim ate g o al o f im p rov in g th e a c cu rac y o f su rv ey rep o rt.
R e q u e s ts fo r re p rin ts sh o u l d b e s e n t to R o b e rt F . B el li, In s ti tu te f o r S o c ia l R e s e a rc h , U n iv er si ty o f M i ch ig a n , A n n A r b o r, M I 4 8 1 0 6 -1 2 4 8 , U S A . E m a il : b b e ll i@ u m ic h .ed u
Ó
1 9 9 8 P s y ch o lo g y P re s s L td
384
BELLI
I llu stra tin g l im ita tio n s in a u to b io g ra p h ic a l re c a ll, s u rv e y re p o rts h a v e re v e ale d g ross u nd e rre p o rtin g o f e v en distinc tiv e e v en ts su c h a s h o spita lisa tio n s (C a nn e ll, F ishe r, & B a kk e r, 1 96 5 ), m o to r v e hic le a cc ide n t in ju rie s (C ash & M o ss, 1 9 7 2), a n d p e rio d s of u ne m plo y m e n t (M a th io w e tz , 1 9 86 ). L en g th o f re ten tio n in terv a l a nd d ura tio n o f ev en t ha v e b ee n sh o w n a s fa cto rs a ffe c tin g un d er re p o rting . F o r e x am p le, C a n ne ll e t al. fo u nd th at re spo n d en ts failed to re p o rt on ly 3 % o f h osp italisation s w h e n a ske d w ithin 1 to 1 0 w ee k s o f th e ev e n t, bu t fa ile d to rep o rt 42 % o f h o sp ita lisa tio n s w h en a sk ed 1 y ea r a fte r the e v en t; C a n n ell e t a l. a lso fo u n d th a t un d e rrep o rtin g oc c urre d m o st o fte n fo r sho rtdu ra tio n h osp ita l stay s (1 ±4 d a ys) . W ith re sp ec t to re m e m b e rin g w h en e ve n ts ha p pe n e d, re sp o n d en ts ten d to re p ort e ve n ts as ha v in g o cc u rre d m ore rec e ntly th a n in a ctu a lity, a p h e no m en o n k n o w n a s fo rw a rd te le sc o pin g (e .g . B ac h m a n & O ’ M a ll e y , 1 9 8 1 ; T h o m p s o n , S k o w r o n s k i, & L e e , 1 9 8 8 ). I n e x p la in in g te lesc o p in g , re se arc h ers h a ve su g g este d p ro c esse s th at in vo lv e eithe r b iase s in te m p o ra l rep re sen ta tio n (B rad b u rn, R ip s, & S h ev ell, 1 9 87 ; B ro w n , R ip s, & S h ev e ll, 1 98 5 ) o r a rtifa cts of be ing ask e d to rep o rt w ith in b o un d ar ie s th at are im po se d b y ask ing te m p o ra l refe ren c e p erio d q ue stion s (H utten lo ch e r, H e d ge s, & B ra d b urn , 1 9 9 0; R ub in & B a d d ele y, 19 8 9 ). F in a lly , a cc u rac y in rep o rtin g ho w o ften e v en ts h ap p en e d ha s b e en fo u nd to b e a c om p le x in te rpla y o f su c h va ria b les as th e fre qu e n cy , sim ila rity , an d reg u la rity o f e ve n ts, th e le ng th o f th e re ten tio n in te rv al, th e u se of c lose d o r o p en -e n de d qu e stio n s, a n d w h e th e r re sp o n de n ts en g a ge in e n um e ration o r estim a tio n p roc e sses o r som e co m b in a tio n of th ese re triev a l stra te g ie s (B row n , 1 9 9 5 ; B u rto n & B la ir, 19 9 1 ; M e n on , 19 9 3 ; M e n on , R a g hu b ir, & S c hw a rz, 1 99 5 ). A l t h o u g h s u c h w o r k h a s b e e n in f o r m a t iv e , i t h a s la r g e ly i g n o r e d psy c ho lo g ic a l stu d ie s th a t h av e fo c us ed on the co n ten t of a uto b io g rap h ica l kn o w led g e an d h o w su ch k n o w le d g e is o rg an ise d an d struc tu red (B arsa lou , 19 8 8 ; C o n w ay , 19 9 6 ; L into n , 1 9 8 6). T h is psy c ho lo g ic a l w o rk ha s c on c e ntra te d on th e in v arian c es th at a re fo u nd in th e re m e m b e ring p roc e ss as p e o ple re c o nstru ct th e ir p erso na l p a st. T h ese in v arian c e s sp ec ify th at c erta in ty p e s o f au to bio g ra p h ica l m em o rie s are the m a tica lly a nd tem p ora lly stru ctu re d w ith in a n hie ra rc h ic al o rde rin g . Fu rthe r, re triev a l o f ep iso d ic in fo rm a tio n co n ce rnin g w h a t ha s ha p pe n e d in th e p a st h as be e n sh ow n to be fa cilita ted by u sin g m e m o rie s fro m hig h er-o rde r le v e ls a s cu e s (C o n w a y & B ek e ria n , 1 9 87 ). A ltho u g h a n y p a rt ic u l a r r e tr ie v a l u s u a ll y fo llo w s o n e p a rt ic u la r p a th w a y th ro u g h t h e au to bio g ra p h ica l m em or y h iera rc h y, th e ric h ne ss o f c u es th at are a v aila ble w ith in the a u to bio gra p hic a l m e m o ry stru ctu re p o te n tiate s th e a b ility to in c rea se th e q u ality a n d co m p le te n ess of re tro sp ec tiv e re po rts, b y e nc o u rag in g th e ac tiv a tio n of m ultip le p a th w a y s a t on e tim e. T h is p a p er w ill illu strate th a t o u r p rese nt u n de rstan d in g o f the struc ture o f au to bio g ra p h ica l kn o w led g e c an b e u se d to im pro v e the q u ality of surv e y re sp o n de n ts’ re tro sp e ctive rep o rts of w ha t, w h en , a n d h o w often ev e n ts ha p pe n e d. In illu strating th is p o ten tial, the re w ill b e sp ec ia l co n c en tration o n
EVENT HISTORY CALENDARS
385
an alre ad y d e ve lo p ed te c hn iq ue in surv e y m eth od o lo gy kn o w n a s th e e v en t h isto ry c alen d a r (C asp i e t a l., 19 9 6 ; F ree d m a n e t a l., 1 98 8 ; K e ssle r & W e th in g to n , 1 9 9 1 ). A lth o u gh d e fin itiv e stu d ies h a ve y e t to b e c o nd u c te d tha t d ire ctly c o n tra st th e e ffec tiv e ne ss o f e v en t histo ry c ale nd a rs in c om p arison to stan d ard su rve y q u estio ns, the u se of e v en t h isto ry ca len d ars ha s b ee n sh o w n to lea d to h ig h-q u ality re tro sp ec tiv e re p orts ev e n a fte r re ten tion in terv a ls o f sev era l y ea rs. R e m a rk a b ly , u tilisatio n of e v en t histo ry c a le n da rs relies o n th e u se o f bo th the m a tic a nd tem po ra l in fo rm a tio n w h ich h as b e en sh o w n to b e so vital as a n asp e ct o f th e stru c tu re of au tob io g ra p h ic a l k n o w led g e. T h u s, th e su cc ess o f th e ev e n t histor y ca le n d ar is la rge ly trac ea b le to th e use o f m an y fa ce ts o f au to bio g rap h ic a l m em o ry struc tu re to im p ro v e the q ua lity of retro sp ec tiv e rep o rts. In ad d itio n to d isc u ssin g th e e v en t h isto ry c a len d ar, I w ill d e vo te atten tion to h o w th is m e tho d o log y ca n po te ntially b e im pro v e d b y an e ve n g re a te r re lia n ce o n tem po ra l an d th em atic cu e s av a ilab le w ithin th e org a nisa tio n o f a u to b io gra ph ic al k no w led g e . T h is p ap e r is d iv id e d in to tw o m ajo r se ction s. T he first se ctio n w ill c o n c e n tr a te o n w h a t is k n o w n a b o u t th e str u c t u re o f a u to b io g r a p h ic a l k no w led g e . T h e sec o n d sec tio n w ill illu strate the im plica tion s o f th is stru c tu re tow a rd s im p ro v ing the q ua lity o f re tro sp e ctiv e rep o rts in su rv e y s.
AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY STRUCTURE A uto b iog ra ph ic al m e m o ry m ay b e b est de scrib e d a s in v olv ing th e rem e m b ra n ce s o f e v en ts th at ha v e b e en p erso n a lly ex p erie n ce d (N e isse r, 1 9 8 6). P erso n a lly e x pe rien c ed ev e n ts a re stru c tu re d in a u to b io g ra ph ica l m e m o ry b y h ie rarc h ic a lly o rd er ed ty p es o f m em o ries fo r e v en ts th at v ary in the ir sc o pe an d sp ec ific ity , a n d th is struc tu re is o rg an ise d a lon g te m po ra l an d the m a tic pa thw a y s w hic h gu id e th e re triev a l p ro ce ss.
Types of Memories A lth o u gh th ere h av e be e n slig htly div e rge n t v ie w s re g ard ing th e va rio u s ty pe s o f m e m o ries th a t p eo p le re co v e r w h e n rem em b e rin g the ir p erso n al p a st (e.g . B arsa lo u , 1 9 8 8; B re w e r, 19 8 6 ; C o n w ay , 19 9 6 ; L in to n , 1 9 8 6), a su m m a ry o f th is litera tu re re ve a ls th re e m a in ty p es. T h e m o st g e ne ral ty p es of m em o ry , w h ic h co m prise s the top a n d m id dle o f th e h ie rarc hy , is fo r e x te n de d e ve n ts. M em o rie s for ex ten d ed ev e nts rev ea l th e te m p o ra l n atu re o f a u to b iog ra ph ica l m em o ry , a s su ch e ve n ts a re e x te n de d in tim e fo r p erio ds a s lo n g as m an y ye a rs to as sh o rt a s just a fe w da y s. C o m p rising th e m id d le of the hie ra rch y are m em orie s fo r su m m a rise d ev e nts, w h ic h e m p h asise th e th e m a tic a sp ec t o f a uto b io g rap h ica l m e m o ry . In re m e m be rin g su m m a rise d ev e n ts, ind iv idu a ls are c on sid erin g th e co m m o n th em es tha t u n de rlie ev e nts of th e sa m e k ind . F in ally, th e m o st d e ta ile d typ e of m em o ry a t th e bo ttom o f th e hie ra rc hy is for sp e cific e ve n ts. M em o rie s o f sp ec ific e ve n ts inc lud e th e pe rc ep tua l a nd e p iso dic info rm a tio n th at p ro v id e s
386
BELLI
a se nse o f `re liv in g’ ’ a p a rtic u la r ep isod e as it o rigin a lly oc c urre d . A s th e re m e m b ering o f a spe c ific ev e nt in vo lv es re c on struc ting d e ta ils fro m a sing le ev e nt, the tim e -spa n o f the se e ve n ts is o f sh ort d u ratio n, fro m m an y se co n d s u p to a nd in clu din g sev e ra l ho u rs (C o n w ay , 19 9 6 ). E x te n d ed E v en ts. A t th e to p o f th e h iera rc hy , e x te n d ed ev e nts c om prise th e m o st fu nd a m e n ta l o rga n isa tion a l stru c tu re s, w h ich n e st all o th e r ty p e s o f au to bio g ra p h ica l m e m o rie s. E x ten d e d ev e nts m a y sp a n m a n y y e ars (e.g . ``W h e n I w o rk at X ’ ’ ) o r b e fairly sh ort in d u ration , p erh a ps e xte nd in g fo r ju st a fe w da y s (e .g . ``trip to W ash in g to n , D C ’ ’ ), a nd th ey h av e ide n tifiab le be g in n in gs a n d en d ing s (if n o t c on tinu in g in to th e p re se nt), alth ou g h th e ex a ct en d po in ts m a y b e fu z z y rath er th a n ex ac t. In a d d itio n, e xte nd e d e ve n ts a re o ften c h ara cte rise d b y be in g disc on tinu o u s in th e ir flo w , in w hic h o th e r ac tiv itie s a re in te rsp erse d (B a rsalo u , 1 9 8 8 ). F o r e x am p le , on e d o esn ’ t w o rk a t ``X ’ ’ fo r 2 4 h o u rs a d ay . A d d itio n ally , ex ten d ed e ve n ts a re n ested w ith in o n e a no th er (B a rsa lo u , 19 8 8 ; N e isse r, 1 9 86 ), suc h tha t a la rg er e x te n d ed e v en t (e.g . ``first jo b as la w ye r’ ’ ) co n tain s o th er sm a lle r e x te n de d ev e nts (e.g . ``p e rio d o f tra in in g’ ’ ). M o re o v er, an y p a rtic u la r e xte n d ed e v en t c o nsists of a te m po ra l o rde rin g o f th o se e le m e n ts th a t it c on tain s, su ch a s the e x te n de d ev e n t o f ``sec on d m arriag e ’ ’ co n sistin g o f a te m p o ra l seq u e nc e o f sm a lle r e xte nd e d e ve n ts su ch a s ``fallin g in lo ve ’ ’ , ``livin g to g e th e r’ ’ , an d ``g e ttin g m arried ’ ’ . A c c o rd in g to so m e th e o rists (C o n w ay , 1 9 96 ; C o n w ay & R ub in , 19 9 3 ; L in ton , 1 9 8 6; S ch o o le r & H errm a n n , 1 99 2 ), ce rtain ex ten d e d e ve n ts se rv e a s th e p rim a ry org a nisa tio n al u n its to a u to b io g ra ph ica l k no w led g e an d are also q u a lita tiv ely d if fe re n t f ro m o th e r ex t en d e d ev e n ts . T h e se m o re p rim a ry ex te nd e d e v en ts, w h ich w ill be refe rre d to a s lifetim e p e rio d s (C o n w ay , 19 9 6 ), rep re sen t m a jor th em atic div isio n s in o n e’ s a u to b io g ra ph y th a t are p articu la rly n o tew o rth y in d ete rm in in g o n e ’ s co n c ep t o f s elf (e .g . w ife , psy c ho lo g ist, so n, stu de n t, e tc .), a nd th e c ha n ge s in th is co n ce p t o f w h o o n e is a cro ss th e lifesp a n (se e F ig. 1 fo r a n illu stration o f C o nw a y ’ s m o de l). A s ex te nd e d e v en ts, lifetim e p eriod s e n co m p ass a ce rta in bo u n d ed p erio d o f tim e (e .g . ``w he n I liv e d w ith `X ’ ’ ’ ), an d n est o the r e v en ts to w h ic h th ey in d ex . L ife tim e s p e rio d s are also rela ted b y sha ring h igh e r-ord e r th e m e s su ch a s a re latio nsh ip s th e m e a nd a w or k th em e (C o n w ay , 1 9 9 6; L into n , 1 9 86 ). W ith in a th em e, the life tim e p e rio d s a re se qu e n tia lly o rde red b y tim e, suc h tha t ``w h en I liv ed w ith `X ’ ’ ’ (w ith in re la tio n sh ip s the m e) pre c ed e s ``w he n I w a s m a rrie d to `Y ’ ’ ’ . A cro ss the m e s, m o re tha n o n e lifetim e pe rio d m a y o v e rla p du rin g th e sa m e p erio d o f tim e , de p en d in g on w h ich h ig h er-o rd e r the m e s are go v er nin g o n e’ s sen se o f se lf a t tha t m o m e nt in tim e . F o r e xa m p le , th e re m a y be o v erlap o f b ein g a fa th e r d u rin g ``w h en I w a s m a rrie d to `Y ’ ’ ’ w ith b ein g a co g nitiv e p sy ch o log ist d urin g ``w h e n I w ork e d at `Z ’ ’ ’ . M o re ov e r, life tim e pe rio d s, an d esp e cia lly th e th em es o f w hic h th ey a re a pa rt, are no t on ly ba se d o n a ctu al e xp e rien ce , b u t are also go v e rne d b y sh a red c ultu ra l no rm s
EVENT HISTORY CALENDARS
387
FIG. 1.
A n illu s tra ti o n o f C o n w a y ’ s (1 9 9 6 ) m o d e l o f h ie ra rc h i c a l au to b io g ra p h ic a l k n o w le d g e s tru c tu r es . C o p y ri g h t Ó 1 9 9 6 b y C a m b rid g e U n i v e rs ity P re s s . R e p r in te d w it h p e rm is s io n .
th a t la r g e ly d e t e r m in e th e w a y s in w h ic h t h e e v e n t s o f li fe w i ll b e ex p e rie n ce d an d in terp rete d. Su m m a rised E v en ts. A m e m o ry fo r a su m m arise d e ve n t re fers to a class o f ev e n ts o f th e sa m e k ind , reflec te d in ph rase s suc h a s ``I w atc he d T V a lot’ ’ o r ``I u sua lly ate lu nc h w ith m y d ad ’ ’ B a rsa lou (19 8 8 ) fo u nd th a t m ost of th e statem en ts in th e ve rb a l re p orts o f pe o p le w ho w e re sto p p ed o n th e ca m pu s o f E m o ry U n iv ersity d u ring a n au tu m n se m e ste r (a nd w h o ag re ed to rela te th eir ex p e rie n ce s fro m th e p a st su m m e r) w e re in th e fo rm of sum m a rised e v en ts. T h e
388
BELLI
pro m in e n ce o f sum m arised ev e n ts in th ese re p o rts su gg e sts th eir im p ortan t role in b e in g a b le to efficie ntly co m m u n ica te to o the rs (an d p e rh a p s to efficie ntly re m e m b er on e se lf) th e sp e cific s o f w h at ha p p en e d d u rin g o n e’ s p e rso n al p ast. In C o n w a y’ s (C o n w a y, 19 9 2 , 1 9 96 ; C o n w ay & R u b in , 1 9 9 3) m o d e l (see F ig. 1), sum m arised e v en ts to g e the r w ith the sh o rte r-te rm e x te n d ed e v en ts (w hic h are no t lifetim e p e rio d s) be lon g to a cla ss o f m e m o ries d ep ictin g g en e ral ev e nts, w h ich a re c o n sid e red a b a sic lev e l o f rep rese n tation (se e R o sch , 1 9 7 8, reg a rdin g ba sic lev e l fo r c ate g orisa tio n ). A s a b asic le ve l o f rep rese n tation , su m m a rise d ev e nts are n o t too ge n era l, w h ich w o u ld lea d to a n ina b ility to c on v ey an y th in g spe c ific ab o u t th e p a st, n o r to o sp ec ific, in w h ic h th e flo w o f p a st e v en ts c ou ld no t b e a de q u ate ly e xp re ssed . S u m m a rise d e ve n ts a re a bstra ctio ns of th e ty p ica l a spe c ts o f sim ila r ev e nts, a n d th u s, b y th e m s e lv es , p ri m a rily re p re s e n t th e m a tic k n o w le d g e a b o u t r e c u r r i n g te m p o r a l p a t te r n s o f e x p e ri e n c e . L i n t o n ( 1 9 8 2 ) d i s c u s s e d a sum m arised ev e n t as a se m a n tic m e m o ry th at fo rm s in th e re pe tition o f tw o or m o re sim ila r e ve n ts, w ith th e e piso d ic in fo rm a tio n fo r an y o n e e v en t be c om in g lost a nd o n ly the ge n er alised in fo rm a tio n fro m th e se m a n tic m e m o ry be in g re tain ed . N e isse r (1 9 81 ) in tro d u c ed the term rep iso dic m em o ry to re fer to th e rep re sen ta tio n of re p ea ted e p iso d es , w ith th e id e a th a t re m e m b e re d de tails m a y re flec t in fo rm atio n in re piso dic m e m o ry a nd n o t b e v erid ic al c o nc e rnin g an y sp e cific e ve n t (a lth o ug h th e re m e m b e rer be lie v e s in th eir ve rid ic ality ). In th e w id e r p ictu re, th e te m p or al org a n isa tio n of e xte nd e d ev en ts is p e rm ea te d to sum m arised e ve n ts, as su m m a rise d ev e n ts a re n e ste d w ith in e xte nd e d ev e nts. F o r ex a m p le, a n u n de rg rad u ate ’ s su m m e r m a y b e re pre se nte d a s a n e xte nd e d ev e nt tha t ne sts sm a lle r e xte n d ed ev e nts su ch a s a n ea rly su m m er job , a pe riod o f va c atio nin g , a n d a la te r p e rio d o f stay ing at h om e w ith o n e’ s p a ren ts; ea c h o f th e sm a lle r e xte nd e d e ve n ts n est re p re se n ta tio n s o f su m m arise d ev e nts suc h a s lu n c he s w ith c o -w o rk e rs d u rin g th e jo b a n d e v en in g h ike s du rin g th e v ac atio n (B a rsalo u , 1 9 88 , p .2 2 5 ). S p e cific e ve n ts. A t th e b o tto m o f the h iera rc h y are m e m o ries fo r sp ec ific ev e nts. R ic h ne ss of au to bio g ra p hic a l m e m o ry is g ain e d in th e rem em b e rin g o f spe c ific e v en ts, w h ich m a y c o n ta in p erc e p tu a l a nd c on te xtu al info rm ation tha t pro v id es a sen se o f re liv in g a p ast e v en t. E x te n d ed in tim e , spe cific e v en ts, su c h as ``tim e I m e t A n g e la’ ’ , ``saw a p la y ’ ’ , o r ``filled o u t an ap p lic atio n’ ’ , are be st ch a rac terised as b ein g c on tinu o u s in th eir tim e co u rse an d spa n nin g m inu tes u p to m a n y h o u rs. W ith in th e h iera rc h y , sp ec ific ev en ts m a y b e in de x e d b y ex te nd e d a n d/o r su m m a rised e ve n ts. In C o n w a y ’ s (1 99 2 , 1 99 6 ) m od e l (see F ig. 1 ), th e p erc ep tu al a nd co n te x tua l in fo rm a tio n (te rm e d as ev en t-sp ec ific kn o w le d g e) o f sp ec ific ev e n ts ex ists a s a n un d iffere ntiate d p o o l of im a g es a n d de tails. T h e se de tails b ec o m e org a n ise d du rin g th e re co n struc tiv e re m em be ring p roc e ss by a ttac h ing to th e th em atic a n d te m p o ra l kn o w le d g e stru ctu re s o f hig h er-o rd er e v en ts. In th is v ie w , a n y
EVENT HISTORY CALENDARS
389
p artic u lar e p iso d ic d etail m ay b e re co n stru c te d w ithin th e bo u n ds o f m o re tha n o ne sp ec ific ev e nt. A nd e rso n a n d C o n w ay (19 9 3 ) ex p lore d th e o rg a n isa tio n o f e v en t-sp ec ific d etails w ith in sp e cific a u to b io g ra ph ica l m e m o ries, suc h as re m e m b er in g th e ``tim e I m et A ng e la’ ’ . T he y disc ov e red tha t c e rta in d istin ctive d eta ils (e.g . ``da n cin g w ith A n g ela ’ ’ ) e nc o ura g e d the rec o gn itio n o f a sp e cific m em ory as a w ho le, w h e rea s a g re ate r n u m b e r o f d eta ils co u ld be re m e m b ere d w h en p e op le rec alled ev e nts in fo rw a rd c hro n o lo g ic a l ord e r. T he se resu lts su g ge st tha t the m a tic a n d tem p ora l in fo rm ation w ill struc tu re sp e cific ep iso de s in m u ch th e sam e w a y as th ey are use d to stru ctu re th e h igh e r-or de r ex te nd e d a n d su m m a rised ev en ts. A s for rem em be ring spe c ific ev e nts, th e d istin ctiv e d etails are ind ice s to spe c ific m e m o ries fro m h ig he r-o rde r stru c tu re s, w h e rea s o nc e ind e xe d , th e c hro n o lo g ica l o rd e rin g o f d e ta ils aid s in rem em b erin g m o re o f w ha t h ad h ap p en e d .
Thematic and Temporal Pathways A s w e h a ve se en in th e p rev iou s se c tio n ou tlin in g ty p es o f a uto b io g rap h ica l m e m o ries, the m a tic a n d te m p o ra l k n ow le d ge se rve a s the b asic o rg a n isin g p rin cip les tha t u n de rlie a ll lev els of au to bio g rap h ic a l m e m o ry stru ctu res. F o r ex a m p le , e xte n de d a nd su m m a rise d e ve n ts are n este d w ith in h igh e r-o rd e r ex ten d e d e v en ts b o th th em atica lly (in refe re nc e to p a rtic ula r p e rs on s a nd ty p e s o f e ve n ts) a n d te m p o rally (in re fere n ce to b ein g p lac e d w ithin a p artic u lar p o in t in tim e on th e b a sis o f life role s an d th e seq u e n ce o f e v en ts). T ak e n a s a w ho le, the te m p o ra l a n d th em atic o rg an isa tio n of a u to b io g ra ph ica l kn o w led g e se rv es a s p oin ts o f a ssoc ia tio n a m o n g th e se v ario us m em ory ty p e s w ith in a ric h n e tw o rk o f re trie va l p ath w ay s th at co m prise th is k no w led g e . In an y p artic u la r retrie v al, h ow e v er, on ly so m e o f th e av a ila b le p ath w a y s are lik ely to b e use d . In de sc rib in g th e re trie va l o f a u to b io gra ph ic al m em o rie s, rese a rc h e rs h av e h ig h lig h ted o n e p ro ce ss a s b ein g top -d o w n in w h ic h th e th e m a tic an d te m p o ra l info rm a tio n o f h igh e r-o rd e r stru ctu re s c u e th e re m e m b e rin g o f m ore spe c ific info rm a tio n (B a rsalo u , 19 8 8 ; C o n w a y & B ek eria n, 19 8 7 ). In a dd itio n , h o w e v er, p eo p le n a v iga te th ro ug h a u to b iog ra p hic al k n o w le d g e in o th er w a y s, su c h a s w he n the y o rd e r a se q ue n c e o f ex te nd e d ev e nts, o r w h en th ey re triev e from p ara lle l e v en ts (B a rsa lo u , 1 9 88 ). T op -d ow n R e trie va l. In C o n w ay ’ s m o d el (A nd e rson & C o n w a y , 1 99 3 ; C on w a y, 1 9 9 6; C o n w a y & B ek e ria n , 1 9 8 7 ; C o n w ay & R u b in , 19 9 3 ), lifetim e p eriod s h o ld th e k e y in co n tain ing v ario us ty p e s o f the m a tic a nd te m p o ra l k no w led g e co n ce rn in g su ch thin g s a s p eo p le, asp iration s, an d sig n ific an t ev e nts. S u ch th em atic an d tem p or al k n o w le dg e , in a b roa d se n se, se rv es to in de x m a n y g en e ra l e v en ts tha t are a sso cia te d w ith p a rtic u la r life tim e pe rio d s. F o r ex a m p le, ``liv in g w ith `X ’ ’ ’ co n tain s th em atic a n d te m p o ra l info rm atio n a b o ut th e
390
BELLI
re latio nsh ip w ith `X ’ w h ic h w ill ind e x the m em ory fo r ``ho lida y in Ita ly w ith `X ’ ’ ’ . In a dd itio n , g en e ral e v en ts co n ta in th em atic an d te m p o ral in fo rm a tio n th a t ind e x es m e m o ries o f m o re sp e cific ev e nts, su ch as ``d in ne r w ith `X ’ o n o u r la st n igh t in R o m e ’ ’ . F urth er, th is m od e l co n side rs th is hie ra rc h ic al o rg an isa tio n as co n sistin g of a u to bio g ra ph ica l m em o ry o rg an iza tio n p a ck e ts (A -M O P s) tha t are tied to th e th e m a tic c o nte n ts o f sp ec ific life p e rio d s. T h u s, a lth ou g h o n e lifetim e p erio d (``livin g w ith `X ’ ’ ’ ) ca n b e c o nte m p o ran e o us w ith a n o th e r lifetim e pe rio d (``w h e n I w o rk e d a t `Y ’ ’ ’ ), the th e m a tic c o nte nts of the se re sp e ctive lifetim e pe rio d s w ou ld c o nsist of sep a rate A -M O P S th at w o u ld in de x th e ir o w n k ind s o f life e ve n ts. E v ide n ce tha t fa vo u rs top -d ow n retriev a l w ith in A - M O P s is p ro v ide d b y re sp on se -tim e stu d ies an d in th e an a lyse s of th e pro to co ls o f su b je c ts re trie vin g spe cific e v en ts. In o n e re sp on se -tim e stu d y, C o n w ay a n d B e ke rian (1 98 7 ) fou n d fa ste r re sp o n se tim e s in the retrie v al o f spe c ific e v en ts, w h ic h w ere cu e d b y ge n era l ev e nts, in a c o nd itio n in w h ich life tim e pe riod s w ere u se d a s p rim e s in co m pa rison to a no -p rim e c o nd itio n . F u rth e r, the y a lso fo u nd th at th e se h igh e rord e r a u to b io gra p hic a l m e m o ry p rim e s a n d cu es sp e ed e d re trie va l in c o m p ariso n to o th er ty pe s o f p rim e s a nd c u es th a t w ere b ase d o n sem an tic c a te g o rie s o r ac tiv itie s. T h ese re sults su pp o rt th e hy p o the sis tha t hig h er-o rde r a uto b io g rap h ica l m e m o ries fa cilita te th e re trie va l o f spe c ific e v en ts, a s p red ic te d by to p-d o w n re triev a l m o d e ls. In a n o th e r resp o n se-tim e stu d y, B row n (1 9 9 0; B ro w n, S h e ve ll, & R ip s, 19 8 6 ) d em o n stra te d th at th e re sp o nse tim e s fo r p olitic a l an d n o np o litica l pu b lic e v en ts w as de p en d e nt on w hic h c on tem p o ra n eo u s p e rio d s p eo p le h a d in m ind . S u bje cts w e re a sk ed to so rt p ub lic e v en ts e ith e r as o cc u rrin g in o n e of tw o U S P resid en tial a dm inistratio ns (C arter o r R e a ga n ), o r in on e o f tw o lifetim e pe rio ds (stud e nt in h ig h sc h oo l o r co lleg e ). S ub jec ts w e re se le cte d suc h th at the y w ere in hig h sch o o l du rin g th e C a rte r a dm inistratio n, a nd in co lle g e d u rin g th e R e ag a n ad m in istra tio n . B row n fo un d tha t p olitic al e ve n ts w e re so rte d m o re qu ic kly in to P re sid e n tia l ad m in istra tio n p erio ds th a n the y w e re sorted in to life tim e p e rio d s, b u t th at n on p o litica l e v en ts w ere so rte d m o re q u ic k ly into lifetim e th a n a d m inistratio n p erio ds. A lth o ug h ad d ressin g m o re dire ctly th e re la tio n sh ip b e tw e e n p ub lic a n d p erso n al e v en ts rath er tha n th e s tru c tu re o f a u to b io g ra p h i c a l m e m o ry p e r s e , B ro w n ’ s re su lts a re sug g es tiv e tha t life tim e p erio ds in de x d iffe ren t a sp ec ts o f th e a uto b io g rap h ica l m e m o ry ba se , c on sisten t w ith th e m o de l th a t a u to b iog ra ph ic al k no w led g e co n sists o f A -M O P s. V e rb al p ro to c ol a n aly ses are a lso su p p ortive o f to p±d o w n re trie v al. In o n e stu d y , C o n w a y (19 9 6 , see C o n w ay ’ s fig u re 3.3 ) p rese n te d su b jec ts w ith cu e w o rd s (e .g . c ha ir, re sta u ran t) w ith ex p lic it in struc tio n s to use th em in re trie vin g spe c ific ev e nts. P ro to co ls rev e ale d su b jec ts w ork in g th rou g h life tim e p erio ds an d g en e ral e ve n ts b efo re re p or tin g th e de tails o f sp ec ific ev e n ts. S im ila r resu lts w e re fou n d w ith su b jec ts ag ed in the ir la te 20 s o r e arly 3 0s w h o w e re a ske d to
EVENT HISTORY CALENDARS
391
rep o rt d e ta ils of sp e cific e ve n ts th a t oc cu rred w h ile th ey w e re 1 8 y e ar s o ld (C o n w a y & B e k erian , 1 9 8 7 , p .1 3 1). Se q u en c in g a n d P a rallel R etriev a l. In ad d itio n to to p-d o w n retriev al, th ere are re triev a l stra teg ies th at in v olv e the c hro n o lo g ica l seq u e nc ing o f e ve n ts w ith in an d ac ro ss the m e s. T h e se re trie va l strate gie s ap p ea r to b ec o m e a pp a ren t w he n in d iv id ua ls are a sk ed to re p o rt o n the ir a u to b iog ra p hic al p a st fo r a n ex ten d e d p e rio d o f tim e , su ch a s in B arsa lo u ’ s (19 8 8 ) stu d y, w he n sub je cts w ere ask e d to re p o rt ab o u t th e p ast su m m e r. T h e to p -do w n p ro ce ssin g ob se rve d b y C on w a y (1 9 9 2, 1 99 6 ; C on w a y & B ek e ria n , 1 9 8 7 ) m a y b e m o re ap p ar en t w h e n ask in g a bo u t sin g le spe ci fic ep iso de s. T h u s, th e n atu re o f th e req u e st pro b ab ly affe cts the retriev a l strate g ie s th a t are em plo ye d . R e trie v als g o ve rne d b y th e re c all of c hro n o lo g ica l ev e nts c o m p le m en t C on w a y’ s (1 9 9 2, 1 9 9 6; C o n w ay & B e ke ria n , 19 8 7 ) e m p h asis th at th e m a tic co n ten t g o ve rn s a uto b io g rap h ica l retriev al. In B arsa lo u ’ s (1 98 8 ) stu dy , alth ou g h su bje cts w e re instru cte d to rec a ll e ve n ts o n the b asis o f w ha t first co m es to m in d, m o st p eo p le sta rte d th e ir re p orts a t th e b eg inn in g of th e su m m e r, w o rkin g ch ro n o lo g ic a lly thro u g h ex ten d ed e v en ts tha t o cc u rre d a t th e first p art o f th e su m m e r. A s B a rsalo u’ s su bje cts w ere like ly to b e asso c ia ted w ith E m o ry U niv er sity (th e y w e re re cru ite d on c am p us), th e bo u n da ry b etw ee n sp rin g an d su m m e r w ou ld b e a pa rtic u la rly n o ta b le tra n sition in d aily a ctiv ities w h ic h w ou ld co inc id e w ith th e be g in nin g o f su m m er (an d th e en d o f th e reg u lar sc ho o l term ). A s fo u n d in o the r w o rk , w hic h h as sh ow n th a t e ve n ts tha t o c cu r a t tra n sitio n p o ints a re m o re m em or ab le th an o the r e ve n ts (P ille m er, G o ld sm ith, P an ter, & W h ite, 1 98 8 ; R o b in so n , 19 8 6 ), su b je c ts be g in nin g the ir re po rts a t th e start of sum m e r inv o lve s th e u se o f th e m a tic info rm a tion a bo u t c ha n ge s in ac tiv itie s tha t are asso c ia ted to a tem po ra l lo ca tion . In a sim ilar v e in , M e an s, N ig a m , Z arro w , L o ftu s, an d D o n ald so n (1 98 9 ) fo u n d tha t sub jec ts’ free re c alls o f h e alth e ve n ts fo r th e pa st y e ar o fte n in c lu d ed th e ch ro n olo g ic a l o rd erin g o f ev e n ts th at pe rtain ed to th e sa m e he a lth co n d ition . T h u s, b oth th e th e m a tic info rm a tio n o f ty p e o f co n d ition an d th e c hro n o lo g ica l o rd e rin g o f e ve n ts w ere u sed in re m e m b e rin g the se p a st e v en ts. T h e tem p or al seq u en c ing o f e xte nd e d e v en ts as o bse rv ed b y B arsa lou (19 8 8 ) ind ica tes th e pre do m ina n c e o f a h o riz o nta l ra th er th an to p±d o w n p ro ce ss. Y e t, a s the re o ften w as a n in term ix in g o f su m m a rised a nd sp ec ific ev e n ts in sub je cts’ rep o rts, to p ±do w n p ro c essin g w a s also oc cu rrin g in th es e retriev a ls. In ad d itio n to se qu e nc in g , B a rsalo u o b serv e d th at sub jec ts a t tim e s fo llo w e d p a ralle l trac k s o f ev en ts in w h ic h o n e c hro n o lo g y o f e xte n de d e v en ts d ea lin g w ith o ne th e m e (e.g . pro jec t a t sc ho o l) w a s fo llow e d in th e p roto c o l b y a se c on d c h ron o lo gy tha t w as co n tem p ora n eo u s w ith the first b ut de alt w ith a d iffe re n t the m e (e.g . ac tiv itie s w ith fa m ily m e m b e rs). Sim ila rly , M ea n s e t a l. (1 9 89 ) fou n d th at w ork rela te d e v en ts w e re a t tim e s u se d a s ju n ctu res to re m e m b er h e alth e ve n ts. T h is jum pin g a c ro ss th e m a tic tra ck s sug g es ts an in terrela tio n sh ip am o n g th e m a tic a lly
392
BELLI
diffe re n t e xte n de d e v en ts th a t is n o t ca p ture d b y th e n otio n o f A -M O Ps, w h ich , in c o m p a riso n , c o n s id er s e x te n d e d e v e n ts as b e in g la rg e ly th e m a tic a lly en c ap su late d . B a rsalo u (19 8 8 ) co n te nd s th at th e ex ten d ed ev en ts b o th w ithin a n d ac ro ss th e m e s are in terrela ted b y th e log ic o f g o a l a tta in m e n t (se e F ig. 2 fo r a n illus tra tio n ). F o r e x am ple , w ith in a w o rk the m e , the a ctiv ities o f on e ’ s first jo b (e .g . A ssista n t Pro fesso r a t `X ’ ) m ay e n ab le on e to d e v elo p skills for a se co n d jo b (e.g . A sso c iate P ro fe ssor at `Y ’ ). A c ro ss th e m e s, o n e’ s first jo b (w o rk th e m e ) m a y b e w h e re o n e m ee ts on e ’ s spo u se (re la tio n sh ip th em e), o r losin g on e ’ s jo b m a y co n trib ute to a n ev e ntu al d ivo rc e. T h u s, th e lo g ic o f g o al a tta inm en t is ba se d o n th e a spira tio n s o f the se lf, a n d suc ce sse s a n d setb ac k s in m e e tin g the se
FIG. 2.
A n illu s tr ati o n o f B a rs a lo u ’ s (1 9 8 8 ) n o tio n th a t lo g i c o f g o a l a tt a in m en t st ru ct u re s in te rre la te e v e n ts b o th w i th in a n d a c ro s s e x t en d e d ev e n ts . C o p y rig h t Ó 1 9 8 8 b y C a m b rid g e U n iv e rs ity P re s s . R e p ri n t e d w ith p e rm is si o n .
EVENT HISTORY CALENDARS
393
asp iratio ns. T h e im p o rtan c e o f go a l attain m e n t in au to bio g rap h ic a l m e m o ry is sh are d by C o nw a y (1 9 9 2, 1 9 96 ; C on w a y & R u b in , 1 99 3 ) w h o a rg ue s tha t a u t o b io g ra p h ic a l th e m e s e m e rg e fr o m c h a n g e s to th e s e lf -c o n c e p t a n d asp iratio ns a nd fea rs th a t su rrou n d c o n ce p tio n s o f p ossib le selv e s (c f. M ark u s & N u riu r, 1 9 8 6). In a v iv id d e m on stratio n o f g oa l attain m e n t, R o b ins on (19 9 2 ) fin d s tha t v erb a l re p orts o f first e x pe rien ce m em o rie s, su c h as th e first tim e on e d riv es a c ar o r the first ro m an tic rela tio n sh ip , are filled w ith d esc rip tio n s of h o w the se ev en ts h ad sh ap e d th e c o nc e p tio n of se lf. In c om b ina tio n w ith to p ±do w n re triev a l, th e n o tio n s o f se q ue n cin g an d p ara lle l re trie v al o utline the e xiste nc e of n u m e ro us in te rc o nn e cted th em atic an d tem po ra l p a th w a y s tha t ca n b e u se d to re m e m be r sp ec ific a uto b io g rap h ica l ev e n ts. A ltho u g h o n ly a sm a ll p o rtio n o f a v aila ble p a th w a ys w ill be use d in an y o ne re trie va l, e nc o u rag in g in d iv id u als to use th e cu es th a t are a va ila b le in m u ltip le, in terc o nn e cte d p a th w a y s in cr ea ses th e p o te n tia l o f m a x im isin g th e q ua lity a n d co m ple ten e ss o f rem em b e re d e v en ts. T h is p ote ntia l of im pro v in g th e q u a lity o f au to b io g ra p h ic a l re m e m b e rin g , th ro u g h th e e n co u r a g em e n t o f resp o n d en ts to e x am in e m o re fully th e in te rc o nn e c tio n s th at ex ist w ith in th eir au to bio g rap h ic a l ne tw o rk s, ha s y e t to b e fu lly a p pre cia ted b y su rv e y rese a rc h ers. T h e ne x t se c tio n w ill a d d re ss this issue m ore fu lly .
AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY STRUCTURE AND SURVEYS T ra d ition a l sta n d ard ised su rve y inte rv ie w s th a t a sk fo r re tro sp ec tiv e re po rts co n sist o f a set of d isc rete q u e stio n s, u sua lly ab o u t sp e cific ev e nts, th at are sep a rate d by to p ic . T h e U n iv ersity of M ic hig an ’ s P a ne l S tu d y of In co m e D yn a m ics, a su rv e y o f fam ily e co n o m ics, in itially a sks qu e stio n s a b ou t h o usin g (e.g . ``H av e y ou m o ve d a n y tim e sin ce the sp ring o f 1 9 9 6? . . . W h a t m o n th an d y ea r w a s th at? ’ ’ ), th en sw itc he s to em p lo y m e n t (e.g . ``In w h a t m on th a nd y ea r d id y o u sta rt w o rkin g in y o ur p re sen t po sitio n ?’ ’ ), an d th e n a sk s q ue stion s a bo u t tim e a w a y fro m w o rk (e .g . ``D id y o u m iss a n y w o rk in 1 9 9 6 b ec au se yo u w ere sick ? . . . H ow m u ch w o rk d id yo u m iss? . . . W h e n w a s th at? . . .’ ’ ). A s an o th e r ex a m p le , the U niv e rsity of M ich ig an ’ s H ea lth F ield S tu d y , a surv ey b a sed o n th e N ation a l H ea lth In terv iew S urv e y, at o n e p o int a sk s ab o ut h o sp ita lisat io n s (e.g . ``Sin ce Ju ly 1 , 1 9 96 , ha v e y ou b e en a p atien t in a h o sp ita l ov e rn ig h t? . . . H o w m a n y d iffere nt tim e s d id yo u sta y in a ny h o spita l o v ern igh t o r lo n ge r sinc e Ju ly 1 , 1 9 96 ? . . .’ ’ ), th en a b ou t h e alth visits (e.g . ``H o w m a n y tim e s ha v e yo u g o ne to a ho sp ital e m e rge n c y roo m a bo u t y ou r o w n h e alth sinc e Ju ly 1, 1 9 96 ? . . . H o w m a n y tim e s h av e y o u se en or ta lke d to a m e dic al do c to r or assista nt a b o ut yo u r o w n h e alth a t a d o cto r’ s office o r at a n H M O sinc e July 1 , 1 9 9 6? . . .’ ’ ), the n ab o u t sp e cific h ea lth se rv ic es (e .g . ``H av e y o u ha d a teta nu s sh o t d u rin g th e pa st ten y e ars? ’ ’ ), a n d the n a b o ut in juries (``H o w m a n y in ju rie s, ac cid e n ts, o r p oiso n ing s h av e y ou h a d sin c e July 1 st, 1 99 6 th at req u ire d y o u to b e se e n by a m e d ic a l d o cto r o r a ssista nt? ’ ’ ).
394
BELLI
In te rm s o f th e stru ctu re of a u to bio gra p hic a l m em o ry , a n d m o re spe cifica lly , w ith reg a rd to the n um b er o f cu e s tha t ca n b e m ad e av a ila b le b y e n co u ra gin g m u ltip le re trie v al ro u tes, tra d itio n al su rv e y qu e stio n ing m e th o ds a re fo u n d w a n tin g . O n th e p o sitiv e sid e, su rv e y q u estio n n a ire s ge n era lly d o e n co u ra g e to p ±d ow n re triev al. A s surv e y re sea rch e rs a re a w a re o f th e n e ed to o rd e r qu e stio n s in w ay s th a t fac ilitate sm oo th tran sitio n s a nd op tim ise flo w (S u d m a n & B ra d bu rn , 1 9 8 2), in m o st c ase s the ge n era l c o nte x t is in tro d u ce d be fo re m o re spe c ific qu e stio n s a re ask e d . M o re n eg a tiv e ly , ho w e ve r, th ere is little o r n o en c ou ra g em en t for se q ue n cin g an d p ara lle l re trie v al. S e q ue n cin g is e n co u rag e d in situ atio ns tha t a sk fo r th e rem em b erin g o f e x te n de d e v en ts, a nd altho u g h surv e y qu e stio n s at tim es d o a pp e ar in te re ste d in su ch e v en ts (n o te th e q u estio n s on tim e o ff fro m w o rk an d ho sp italisa tion s q u ote d e arlier), th e ir inte nt a pp e ars to fo c u s m o re o n d iscre te p oin ts in tim e rath er th an o n a c o n tin uo u s stre a m o f ev e nts. W o rse still is th e to ta l lac k of e n co u ra ge m e n t fo r p a ra llel retriev a l, tha t is, th e re m e m b er in g o f in terc o n ne c te d a sp ec ts o f on e ’ s p e rs on a l p ast tha t asso c iate th e m e s to o n e a n oth e r. A s su rv e y qu e stio n n aires ty p ic a lly m o v e fro m to p ic to to p ic , resp o nd en ts are e n co u rag e d to seg m en t th eir p ath s in to un its tha t are larg ely u n re late d to o n e an o the r. T a ke n tog e the r, th e la ck of u se o f cu es a v a il a b le in th e st ru c t u re o f a u to b io g r a p h ic a l m e m o ry m a y b e la rg e ly re sp o n sib le fo r th e e rrors th a t h a v e b e en se en in resp o n d en ts’ attem p ts to rep o rt w h a t, w h en , a n d h o w o fte n e v en ts ha v e ha p pe n ed .
Event History Calendars A diffe re n t ap p roa ch to ask in g surv e y qu e stio n s inv o lv e s th e u se o f ev en t h isto ry c a le n d a rs , w h ic h h a v e c o n s id e ra b le p o te n t ial in u tilis in g th e to p - d o w n , seq u e ntial, an d pa rallel c u es tha t a re av a ila b le in the stru ctu re o f a uto bio g rap h ica l m e m o ry . In co n tra st to tra d itio na l su rve y q u estio n s tha t e m p h asise ev e nts a s d iscre te o cc u rren c es, w ith the e v en t h isto ry c a len d ar, resp o nd e n ts are en c ou ra g ed to c o nsid er v a rio u s e ve n ts th at co n stitu te th eir p erso n al p asts a s co n tain ed w ithin b roa d e r th e m a tic strea m s o f ev en ts. N ot o n ly ca n resp o n de n ts no te th e inte rrela tio nsh ip o f ev e nts w ith in th e sam e th e m e s (top -d ow n a n d seq u e ntial retriev al) b ut, d e pe n d in g on w hic h th e m e s a re re pre se nte d b y th e ca len d ar, resp o n d en ts c an a lso n ote th e in te rrela tio n sh ip s a m o n g e ve n ts tha t ex ist w ithin d iffe ren t th e m e s (p a rallel retriev a l). P io n ee red b y rese a rc h e rs inte re ste d in life h isto ries (e.g . Fre ed m a n et al., 19 8 8 ), th e u se o f e v en t h isto ry c alen d a rs h as b e en ba se d o n th e n otion th a t life histor ie s c on sist o f tra jec to rie s a nd tra n sitio ns (E lde r, 1 9 8 5 ). L ife tra jec torie s are lon g -term ex ten d e d pa tte rn s tha t refle ct m ajo r do m ain s su ch a s w o rk , liv in g arra n ge m e n ts, an d re latio n sh ips, a n d a s suc h a re c on c e ptu ally sim ilar to the m es as d iscu sse d in the litera ture on a u to b iog ra ph ica l m e m o ry . T ran sitio n s are em b ed d ed w ith in tra je c to ries a n d re pre se nt p o in ts in tim e in w h ic h a bru p t ch a ng e s oc cu r, su c h a s g e ttin g m a rrie d or d iv o rce d , or fin d in g th a t first job .
EVENT HISTORY CALENDARS
395
T ra n sitio ns a re th e refo re be g inn in g a n d en d p oin ts o f lifetim e p e riod s o r o the r sign ific a nt ex ten d ed ev e nts. In a dd ition , the d y na m ic a sp ec t o f th e life c ou rse ev o lve s a s a n in terp la y am o ng traje cto rie s a n d th e ir tran sition s, w h ic h are inte rd e p en d en t o n on e an o the r. A g a in , th is in terd e pe n de n c e is reflec te d in au to bio g rap h ic a l m em ory as th e in te rrela tio n sh ip a m o n g th em atic ally d iffe ren t ex ten d e d e v en ts. E v e nt history c ale n d ars, th e n , w e re first d ev e lo pe d a s a tte m p ts to assist resp o n d en ts in rec a lling th eir dy n am ic p a sts. C o n sid er th e life histo ry c ale nd a r o f F re ed m an e t al. (1 9 88 ). A s d e pic te d in F ig . 3 , th is c a le n da r p rese n te d fiv e the m e s th at e x am in e d p la c es of re side n c e, p erso n s resid in g w ith an d th eir rela tio ns hip s, sc h oo lin g, w o rk , a n d m ilitary serv ice . E a ch the m e w as re p rese n te d b y its o w n rele va n t tim e lin e s tha t co v ere d a 1 0 -ye a r p e rio d . R e spo n d en ts w ere ask e d to re po rt th e m o n th a nd y ea r o f all e ve n ts in clu din g c erta in sp ec ific e v en ts (e.g . birth s o f o ffsprin g ) a nd th e be g in nin g a n d e nd p o in ts of ex ten d e d e ve n ts (e.g . m a rria g es, co h a bita tio ns). S u pe rfic ially , the life h isto ry ca le n d ar m irro rs the k ind s o f in form ation th a t w ill b e a v aila ble in th e rem em be rin g of lifetim e p eriod s, a s it re pre sen ts th o se the m e s th a t are like ly to b e sha re d b y m e m b e rs o f a c ultu re . M o re im p ortan tly , th e life histo ry ca len d ar e nc o u ra g e s a n e xte nsiv e u se o f th e a u to b io g ra ph ica l m e m o ry n e tw o rk an d th e m ultip le pa ths a ssoc ia te d w ith to p -d o w n , se q u en tia l, a nd p ara lle l re trie v al strateg ies. T o p -d o w n R e triev a l. O rg a n ise d b y th e m e s, th e life h isto ry c a le n d a r en c o ura g es top -d o w n retrie v al. F o r e x am p le , th e first tim elin e, d e aling w ith p la ce s o f re sid e n ce , e nc o u ra g e s re sp on d e nts to rep o rt in w h a t p lac es (e .g . c ities, tow n s) the y h av e liv ed (a nd w h e n), a task th at fo r m o st resp o nd e nt s is d o n e q u ite ea sily , p erh a ps b ec au se th e fo c u s is o n retrie v ing lifetim e p erio ds. A n o th e r tim elin e de a lin g w ith m a rita l e ve n ts a n d co h a bita tio n a sks fo r rep o rtin g o f th e p erso n s w ith w h ic h o n e is in v olv ed . A n o th e r ex a m p le th a t req u ire d m o re d eta iled in fo rm a tio n in v o lv e d the re p o rtin g o f w o rk h isto rie s, in w h ic h resp o n d en ts w ere a ske d to rep o rt o n th e n um b er of w e e kly h ou rs w o rk ed . T h e en c o ura g em en t o f to p-d o w n retriev al w ith the w o rk h isto ries w o u ld h av e b ee n en h a nc e d if, in a dd itio n to w ee k ly ho u rs, resp o nd e n ts h ad b e en a sk ed ex p lic itly to re po rt the ir lifetim e p erio ds re g ard in g th e p lac e s in w h ic h the y w ere w ork in g. T h e life tim e p erio ds co u ld se rve as a retrie v al c u e fo r re m e m b ering w e ek ly w o rk h ou rs. Se q u en c in g a n d P a ra lle l R e trie va l. In c om p arison to trad itio n a l sta nd a rd ise d su rv e y te c hn iq u es, th e life h isto ry c a le n da r e x ce ls in e nc o ur ag ing re triev a l thro u gh c u es o b tain e d b y na v iga tin g thro u g h se q u en tial pa th w ay s w ith in th e m e s an d p ara lle l p ath w a ys a cro ss th e m e s. A s ad m in istere d b y Fre ed m a n e t a l. (1 9 8 8), the life h isto ry ca len d ar em ph a sised se q ue n tia l retrie v al, as in terv iew e rs w ere instru cte d to e lic it th e c hro n olo g ica l re triev a l o f ev e nts w ith in th e first p rese nte d the m e (p lac es o f re side n c e), an d th en m ov e o n to oth er th e m e s in th e o rde r o f
FIG. 3.
T h e tru n ca t ed a n d re d u c e d re p ro d u c ti o n o f t h e lif e h i st o r y c a l en d ar u se d i n th e S tu d y o f A m e ri c an F a m ilies a n d d i sc u s se d b y F r ee d m a n et a l. (1 9 8 8 ). C o p y rig h t Ó 1 9 8 8 b y t h e A m e ri c an S o ci o l o g ic a l A s s o c ia t io n . R e p rin te d w it h p e rm is s io n .
396
397
398
BELLI
ap p ea ra nc e o n th e c ale nd a r. C h e ck s w e re m ad e to e n sure th at n o g ap s oc c urre d in th e re p orting o f e v en ts. A s fo r p a ra llel re trie v al, resp o n d en ts m ay h av e spo n tan e o us ly c oo rd ina ted re sp o nse s fro m th o se tim e lin e s th at h a d alrea d y b ee n an sw e red to th os e re sp o nse s g iv en in th e la ter sta g es o f the in te rv iew . In fac e-to fa c e inte rv ie w in g , th e visu al pre se nta tio n o f e ac h th em e a lo n g th e sa m e tim e dim e n sio ns fa cilita ted e xa m in in g p a ra lle l tra ck s o f ev e n ts. M e m ory re sea rch e rs (B a rsalo u , 1 98 8 ; N e iss er, 1 9 8 8) h av e no ted tha t spa tia l p e rc e p tio n s a n d m e ta p h ors a re u sed to rep re se nt tim e (e.g . ``th o se d ay s a re b eh ind m e’ ’ ) a n d th e c a le n da r’ s spa tia l re p re se n ta tio n of tim e pro v id ed a cle ar m e an s to e xa m in e th o se e v en ts tha t w ere re p o rte d to h av e oc c urre d ea rlie r, at the sa m e tim e , a n d la ter tha n o th e r e v en ts. T h us, fo r ex a m p le , re sp o n de n ts w h o w e n t to w ork p arttim e fo llo w in g th e b irth o f a ch ild c o u ld see w h eth er th ey ha d a pp ro p ria te ly c o o rd i n a te d th es e e v e n ts in th e ir re p o rts . A d d itio n a lly , in te r v ie w e r s, in ex a m in in g re p orts fo r in co n sisten cie s, co u ld q ue ry re spo n d en ts a b ou t th e ac cu ra c y of a cro ss-th em e re p o rts th a t a p p ea red o u t o f th e o rdin a ry . F o r ex am p le, a re sp o n de n t w ho re p o rte d b o th w o rk in g a n d g o in g to sc ho o l fu ll-tim e at th e sam e tim e co u ld b e ask e d to clarify th e ac cu ra cy o f th e se resp o n se s. B a rsalo u ’ s (19 8 8 ) n otion re g ard ing th e lo g ic o f g oa l a tta inm e n t ca ptu re s th e in terrela tio n sh ip o f e x te n d ed ev e nts b oth w ith in a nd ac ro ss th em es d u e to th e lo g ic a l a sso cia tio n of o n e e x te n de d ev e nt (e.g . b irth an d in fa nc y of `X ’ ) w ith o th er ex ten d e d ev e n ts tha t a re e ith er co n tem p ora n eo u s (e .g . w o rk in g pa rt-tim e at `Y ’ ) or tha t o c cu r la te r (e .g . `X ’ a tte nd s `Y ’ e lem en tary sch o o l). T h u s, th e lo g ic o f g o al a tta in m en t, a v ailab le in b o th se q ue n tia l an d p ara lle l re triev a l, pro v id es in form atio n reg a rd in g th e rela tiv e tem po ra l ord e rin g o f ev e nts. R e c on stru ctive m od e ls of e v en t d atin g a re ba se d o n the n o tio n th a t th e co n ten ts o f re m e m b er ed e x p erien c es co n tain c lue s re g ard ing w h e n th ey h a d oc c urre d (F rie d m an , 1 99 3 ; T ho m p son , S k o w ro n sk i, L a rse n , & B e tz, 1 9 96 ). T h e se re co n stru c tiv e m o d els are sup p o rte d by ev id en c e th at g re a te r p re c isio n in d a tin g p ast e ve n ts oc c urs fo r m em orie s in w h ich th ere ex ists a g re a te r de g ree o f c on te nt o r m em or ab ility (B a rtle tt & S n elu s, 1 98 0 ; B ro w n e t al., 19 8 5 ; T h o m p so n e t al., 1 98 8 ). T h e tem po ra l seq u en c ing o f ev e nts a sso cia te d by th e lo g ic o f g o al attain m e n t ca n also serv e a s in fo rm a tio n tha t w ill fa c ilitate th e attain m en t o f a m o re p rec ise rec o n stru c tio n o f w h e n e v en ts h a d ha p pe n e d. A d d itio n ally , th e m u ltip le cu e s g en e ra te d in ev e n t h isto ry ca le nd a rs ca n p ro m o te the re m e m b e ring of oth erw ise fo rg otten ev e nts th a t w ill a ffec t th e a c cu r a cy a n d c o m p le te n e ss in r ep o r tin g w h a t e v e n ts h a d h a p p e n e d (A nd e rson & P ic he rt, 1 9 7 8; F ish e r & Q u ig le y , 1 9 9 2 ). F in ally , th e rep o rtin g o f h o w o f t e n e v e n ts h a d o c c u rr e d t ra n s p ir e s i n d ir e c tl y fr o m r e s p o n d e n t s re m e m b ering w h a t ha d h ap p en e d ac ro ss the re ca ll p e rio d d em a rc a te d b y th e tim e line s, a n d in w h ich th e nu m b er of e ve n ts p e r u n it tim e c a n b e e stab lish e d b y th e r e s e a r c h e r a ft e r th e d a t a a r e c o l l e c te d . G a in in g ` ` h o w - o f t e n ’ ’ in fo rm a tio n th ro ug h th e ev e n t h istory ca le nd a r co n trasts w ith trad itio n a l surv e y qu e stio n s, w h ic h d ire ctly a sk for re po rts of th e n u m b e r of e ve n ts
EVENT HISTORY CALENDARS
399
w ith in a g ive n re fere n ce p e rio d , a nd w hic h o ften p ro v id e a de a rth of cu e s to h elp re sp o n de n ts re m e m b e r th e o c cu rre nc e o f th ese ev e n ts. R e spo n se q u a lity . O f c o u rse , a rg um en ts c on c ern in g th e e ffic a cy o f e v en t h isto ry ca len d ars are v ac u o us un le ss the re is ev id en c e th a t th e ir use le ad s to ac c ura te re p or tin g of p a st ev e nts. F ree d m a n et a l. (1 9 88 ) w e re ab le to c om p are the retro spe c tiv e re p orts o f sc h o ol a tte nd a n ce an d w ee k ly w o rk h o u rs in the life h isto ry c alen d ar a ga inst a co n cu rre nt re p o rt ga the red w ith sta nd a rd in te rvie w in g tha t ha d ta ke n p la c e fiv e y ea rs ea rlie r. In e x am in in g th e sa m e m o n th o f the p rio r co n c urre n t re po rt, 8 7 % o f resp o n d en ts g av e id e n tic al an sw e rs to b oth inte rv ie w s reg a rd in g fu ll-tim e , pa rt-tim e , or n o sc ho o l a tten d a nc e . R e spo n d en ts retro sp ec tiv e ly rep o rted the m se lv es a s b ein g sligh tly b u sier in th eir e m p loy m e n t statu s in c om p ariso n to the c o nc u rren t re p ort. Ide n tic a l an sw er s reg a rdin g w ork in g fu ll-tim e , p art-tim e, o r n ot w ork in g w e re p rov id ed b y 7 2 % o f resp o n d en ts, w h ich im pro v ed to 8 3 % w he n c ollap sin g full- a nd p a rt-tim e w o rk. In a n o the r ap p lica tio n o f a life h isto ry c ale nd a r, C a sp i e t al. (1 9 9 6) fo u n d at lea st 9 0% a gre em e nt b etw ee n retro sp ec tiv e re p orts o f a c tiv itie s fo r a g iv en m o n th o n the life h istory ca le nd a r a n d c o nc u rren t rep o rts o b ta in ed th re e y e ars ea rlier w ith liv ing a rra n ge m en ts, c o ha b ita tio n , sc ho o ling , e m plo ym en t, a n d jo b tra in in g. T h e h ig h le v els o f a gre em e nt to th e m o n th in b o th o f the se ex a m p les of a life h isto ry c alen d ar g ain a d dition a l im p ac t w h e n o ne co n sid e rs th at th e resp o n de n ts in b oth stu d ie s w e re in e arly a d ulth oo d w h e n b e in g su rv ey e d . S pe c ific ally, F ree d m a n et al.’ s (1 9 8 8) fiv e-y ea r re tro sp ec tiv e re p o rt in v olv ed 2 3 -ye a r-o ld resp o n d en ts re po rtin g o n e v en ts tha t h a d o cc urre d w h ile the y w e re 18 y e ar s o ld ; C asp i et a l.’ s (1 99 6 ) re sp o n d en ts w ere 2 1 y ea rs o ld w h e n th e y pro v ide d retro sp ec tiv e rep o rts o f e ve n ts tha t h a pp e n ed w h e n th ey w e re 18 y ea rs o ld. Y ou n g ad u lth o o d is m a rke d b y a n u m b e r of tran sitio n s in life ev en ts, a n d le ve ls o f a g ree m e n t a re lik ely to h av e be e n c o m p rom ised b y th is flu idity . H ow e v e r, the re c an n o t b e c e rta in ty th at the ev e nt h isto ry ca le n da r m e tho d o log y im p ro v e s the q u ality o f re tro spe c tiv e rep o rts in co m p a riso n to o the r su rv ey in g tec h niq u es, as no su c h dire ct c o m p ariso n s h av e b ee n m a d e. N ev e rth e le ss, in c o m p arin g ind irec tly th e h ig h le ve ls o f ag re em en t rep o rte d w ith th e u se o f ev e nt h isto ry ca len d ar s for re ten tio n in terv a ls of se v era l y ea rs (C asp i e t a l., 1 9 9 6; F re ed m an e t al., 1 9 88 ) a ga in st th e lac k of re p orting w ith tra ditio na l surv e y q ue stio n s o f ev e n ts a t th e sa m e or g re a ter lev els o f d istin c tiv e ne ss afte r a on e -y e ar re te n tio n inte rv a l (C an n e ll et a l., 1 9 65 ; C a sh & M o ss, 1 9 72 ), the ev e n t h isto ry c ale nd a r m e tho d o log y g iv e s th e stro n g im p re ssio n th a t its u se p ro m o te s the a b ility o f resp o n d en ts to a cc u ra tely pe e r fu rth e r ba c k in to th eir p erso n al p asts. P o ten tial A p plic ation s. F o r th e m o st p a rt, e ve n t h isto ry ca len d ar s h av e b ee n u sed in situ atio n s in w hic h re spo n d en ts w e re ask e d to rep o rt o n m a jo r life ev e n ts (C a spi e t a l., 1 9 9 6 ; F re ed m an e t al., 19 8 8 ; F u rsten b e rg , B ro o k s-G un n , & M org a n , 1 98 7 ; K essler & W e thin g to n , 1 9 9 1; L y ke tsos e t al., 1 99 4 ) su ch a s
400
BELLI
re side n c e c h an g e s, m a rriag e s an d co h a bita tio n, b irth s an d d ea ths, em p lo y m en t an d sc h oo lin g c ha n ge s, fe lo n y c rim e s, an d p e rio d s o f se riou s p hy sic al a n d m e n ta l illne sse s. In p rinc iple , p o te n tia lly les s distinc tiv e ev e nts su c h as h e alth visits to p hy sic ia n s, ch a ng e s in d a y-c a re arran g em e n ts for ch ild re n , a n d co n sum e r p u rch a ses c an also b e m e asu re d u sing ev e n t h isto ry c ale n da rs. O f co u rse, w ith m un d a ne e v en ts, th e le n gth o f tim e u se d to g a th e r retro spe c tiv e re p o rts w ill n e ed to b e ad ju sted to re fle ct w h a t p ote n tia lly c an be re co v e ra b le, a n d th is d e p e n d s o n th e d e g r e e to w h ic h th e e v e n ts o f in te r e st l a c k distinc tiv e n ess. F o r m u n d an e c on su m e r p u rch a se s, su c h as visits to re stau ra n ts, a re ca ll p e riod o f a fe w m o n th s o r so m a y be rea so n ab le , b u t n o t m u ch b ey o n d th is. In a d dition to rec a ll p e rio d s, th e u nits o f m e asu re m e n t ne e d to b e co n side red . W ith v e ry le ng thy re ca ll p e rio d s, su c h as a p eriod o f m a n y y e ars w ith life h isto ry ca len d ars, usin g m o nth s as th e u nit of m ea su rem en t is rea so n ab le . W ith sh orte r re c a ll p eriod s, p erh ap s o n e or a few y ea rs, w e e ks m a y a d eq u a te ly serv e a s u n its; da y s c an serv e a s o p tim al u n its w ith e ve n sh o rte r re ca ll pe riod s su c h a s a m on th or tw o . In su m m a ry , th e re is c o nsid e ra b le fle xib ility in u sin g e v en t h isto ry ca len d ars as th e le n g th o f re ca ll p eriod s a nd u nit siz es c an be ad ju ste d to m ee t th e de m a n ds o f th e kin d o f ev e nts tha t re sea rc he rs a re in te re ste d in m e asu ring . A n im p ortan t c o nsid er ation in th e use of e v en t h isto ry c ale n da rs is w h e th e r th e re are m ultip le tim eline s, e ac h refle ctin g an a u to b iog ra p hic al th em e, th a t are a p p ro p ria te to u se a n d w h i c h w ill e n c o u ra g e r e trie v a l o f in st a n c e s o f in terd e p en d e nc e a m o n g th e se th em es. A s h a s be e n n o ted , th e stru ctu re o f au to bio g ra p h ica l m e m o ry c an b e c on sid ere d as re flec tin g m an y h iera rc h ica l la y e rs o f e x te n de d e v en ts tha t a re n e ste d w ith in on e a no th e r, all a dh e ren ts w ith in th e sam e th em e (e.g . B arsa lo u , 1 9 88 ). In a dd itio n , the re a re a n u m b e r of the m e s, ea ch w ith its o w n h iera rch ic al stru ctu re , w h ich also c o nta in p oin ts o f a sso cia tio n w ith the h iera rch ies of o th er th em es . T hu s, the m e s w ill b e reflec te d in v ario us le v e ls o f th e h ie ra rch y , a n d o n e ne ed no t u se o n ly hig h -ord e r tim eline s (e .g . see k in g to e x am in e lifetim e the m e s in lo n g-te rm rela tio n sh ip s su ch as ``livin g w ith `X ’ ’ ’ ) in o rd e r to be n efit fro m th em e in te rd ep e nd e n ce . In stea d , a re sea rch e r ca n restrict p en e tra tio n to lo w e r-le ve l ev e nts th a t c an be refle cte d in sh orte r tim e line s (e.g . `` `X ’ s infa n cy ’ ’ ). A s o n e e xa m p le , c on side r h ea lth e ve n ts. R e sea rc he rs ha v e o ften b ee n in tere sted in h ea lth u tilisatio n an d g ain in g a cc u ra te re p o rts o f su ch e v en ts a s ho sp italisa tion a n d visits to p h ysic ian s’ o ffic es. A lth o u gh n o t d ire ctly id en tifie d as a n a uto b io g rap h ica l th em e, th e statu s o f on e ’ s h e alth c ertain ly c an ha v e a s m u c h im pa c t in so m e p eo p le’ s liv e s a s th e ir re la tio n sh ips, liv ing a rran g em e n ts, an d w o rk h isto rie s. In te rm s o f e x te n de d ev e nts, e xte nd e d p e rio d s of illn ess, in jury re c u pe ration , an d h o sp ita lisa tio n s co u ld ad h e re to a he a lth statu s the m e , an d ea c h co u ld b e reflec ted in sep ar ate tim e line s. S p e cific e v en ts suc h a s surg e rie s a nd h e alth v isits a lso a re th em atica lly re la ted a uto b io g rap h ica l ev e nts.
EVENT HISTORY CALENDARS
401
A s h e a lth v isits a re o fte n a sso c ia te d w ith o th e r h e a lth e v e n ts su c h a s h osp ita lisation s, in p ro v idin g tim e lin es fo r b o th typ e s of ev e n ts resp o n de n ts ca n be en c ou ra ge d to co o rdin a te w h e n ea ch typ e o f ev e nt h ad oc c ur re d . In term s o f o th e r the m e s, tim e o ff fro m w o rk , a nd ca re of c h ild re n ca n b e affe cte d by th e statu s of o n e’ s h ea lth . In c on stru ctin g a n e v en t h isto ry c a le n da r, in te re st in g ain in g ac c ura te in fo rm a tion o n ra the r m u n da n e e v en ts su ch as h ea lth v isits w ill ind ica te th e u se o f re c all p e rio d s of fairly sh o rt d u ration (a y e ar or tw o). N ev e rth e le ss, th e re is co n sid era ble o pp o rtu nity to see k m u ltip le cu e s fro m th e o nse t an d reso lutio n o f a n um be r o f d iffere n t e xte n d ed an d sp ec ific e ve n ts in rec o nstru c tin g h ea lth -rela te d ev e nts usin g an e v en t h isto ry ca len d ar m e th o d o lo g y .
Enhancements to Event History Calendars T h e re is n o d o u b t th at the e ffic ac y o f e v en t h isto ry c a len d ars c an b e en h an c e d b y furth er d ev elo p m e n t. T w o p articu la r m e tho d s sh o w th e g rea test po ten tia l, usin g lan d m a rk s to a id the da tin g o f p ast e v en ts, a nd en c o ura g in g pa ra lle l retrie v al. B oth m eth o ds rely o n a m ore e x te n sive u se o f te m p o ral a n d the m a tic c u es tha t w ou ld oth erw ise b e u sed o nly spo n ta ne o usly a nd e rra tic a lly by resp o n d en ts. L an d m a rks. Pa rticu lar lan d m a rk e v en ts are so n ote w orth y th at resp o n de n ts are a b le to lo ca te the se e ve n ts e ith er ex a ctly o r n ea rly ex a ctly in tim e, a n d the y ca n b e u se d a s an ch o rs to lo c a te w h en o the r e ve n ts ha p p en e d (L o ftu s & M arb u rge r, 1 9 8 3). M ea n s et al. (19 8 9 ) n o ted the sp o n ta n eo u s u se of lan d m ark s in th e d a tin g o f h ea lth e v en ts in a p ilo t stud y w ith v o lun te er sub je cts. T h e au th ors n o te (1 9 89 , p.2 5 ) th at lan d m a rk e v en ts su ch a s ``h o lid a ys , w ed d ing s, p artie s, job c h an g e s, a n d m a jo r h e alth ev e nts’ ’ w e re u se d to da te h ea lth v isits fo r a 1 2 -m o nth pe rio d . T he re is n o d o ub t th a t in the u se o f e v en t histo ry ca len d ars, resp o n d en ts sp o nta n eo u sly g en e ra te the ir o w n la n d m a rks. H o w ev e r, re c all q ua lity is lik e ly to b e e n h an c ed if, in the a d m in istratio n of th e ca len d ar, lan d m a rk s a re syste m a tic a lly in tro d u ce d . A s o n e ex a m p le , in th e u se o f a 1 2 m o n th e v en ts h isto ry c a le n da r, K e ssler a nd W e thin g ton (1 99 1 ) u sed h o lid ay s a s p re -ind ic ate d lan d m a rk s an d fou n d h ig h reliab ilities in e v en t rep o rtin g b etw ee n sp ou se s. Im p orta ntly , th e use o f la n d m a rks ap p ea rs n o t on ly to assist in e v en t d atin g, b ut a lso to im pro v e th e a b ility to re m e m b e r w ha t h ap p e n ed , an d h o w ofte n , b y assistin g in th e d ise nta ng lin g o f sum m a rise d ev e n ts. A s a b strac tio n s of re pe a te d ev e n ts, su m m arise d e v en ts a re o ften c ha ra cte rise d as b e in g b len d ed re p re se n ta tio n s o f sp ec ific e v en ts, in w h ic h a ny distinc tiv e e piso d ic in form atio n th a t ca n d isting u ish on e p a rticu la r ep iso de fro m a n o th e r is n ot re ta ine d (L in to n, 1 98 2 ; M ea n s & L o ftu s, 1 9 91 ; M e an s et a l., 19 8 9 ). In this m a nn e r, su m m a rised ev e nts, alth ou g h im p o rta n t in th at th e ir rec all p ro m o te s a n u nd e rstan d in g of th e
402
BELLI
co n siste n cie s tha t p re se nt th em se lv e s in o u r w orld , a re se en as b ein g the b a ne o f surv e y rese arc h ers. F or e x am p le , M e an s e t al. (1 9 89 ; M ea n s & L o ftu s, 19 9 1 ) no te d th at re cu rre nt h e alth v isits fo r th e sa m e h ea lth p ro ble m , w hic h are lik e ly to be re p re se n te d a s su m m a rise d e ve n ts, w e re re c alled le ss w e ll th a n no n -rec u rren t he a lth v isits. H o w ev e r, a stu d y co n d itio n th a t inc lud e d a ssistin g resp o n d en ts to ge n era te p ers on a lly m e an in gfu l la n dm a rks a lo n g a 1 2 -m o nth ca len d ar led to a n in c re a se d ab ility a m o n g resp o n d en ts to rem em b e r d istinc tive e p iso d ic in fo rm a tio n w ith re cu rre nt v isits, im p ro v in g th e ac c ura cy o f resp o nse . In assisting resp o n d en ts to use la n dm a rks, re se arc he rs sh ou ld n o te tha t la n d m a rks c a n b e c yc lic o r lin e ar in n atu re (T h om p son e t al., 1 9 96 ). C y c lic la n d m a rks are th o se tha t re p ea t a fte r c ertain in terv a ls o f tim e, su c h a s a y e ar. A n n u a l ce leb ra tio n s su ch a s h o lid ay s, b irth d ay s, a n d an n iv ersa rie s a re ex a m ple s of c y clic la n dm a rks w h o se da tes w ill o fte n b e k no w n . L ine a r la n d m a rks, o n th e oth e r h an d , a re on e -tim e oc c ur re n ce s. P erso n s m a y re m e m b e r su c h n o te w orth y da te s a s w h e n the y le ft for a E u ro p ea n v a ca tion , o r d a te s in w h ich resid en c e m o v es w ere m a de . F irs t ex p e rie n ce s ca n a lso p ro v ide lin ea r la n dm a rks, su ch a s th e d a te th at on e e nte red a ne w jo b, th e tim e th a t o ne first d rov e a c ar alo n e, o r th e o cc u rre n c e o f n a tu ral d isaste rs (P illem e r e t al., 1 9 88 ; R o bin so n, 1 99 2 ). B irth , d e ath s , a n d m a rr ia g e s a re lin e ar la n d m a rk s, a lth o u g h th e ir la t er a n n u a l re m e m b ra n ce s a re c yc lic la nd m a rk s. F in ally , rese a rc h ers m ay a lso w a n t to re m in d resp o n de n ts a b ou t sea so n al ch a ng e s th a t m ay b e a sso cia te d w ith th eir life ro u tine s, suc h a s a ca de m ic c a le n da rs (a utu m n se m este r, sp rin g se m e ster, sum m er) tha t p rov ide in form a tio n on d istin c tiv e pe rio d s o f a ctiv ity (R o b in son , 19 8 6 ). W h eth e r o ne en c ou ra ge s th e u se o f c y clic lan d m a rk s m a y de p en d o n th e le n g th o f re ca ll. C y clic la nd m a rk s a re lik e ly to lo se th e ir distinc tiv e n ess a s re c all pe rio d s in clu de m ore c yc les. S ca le e ffe c ts in au tob io g ra p h ic a l re ca ll in d ic ate tha t pe o ple w ill at tim e s be b e tte r ab le to lo c ate an e v en t o n sm a lle r tim e sca les (e .g . m o n th o f o cc u rren c e) th an o n larg er tim e sc ales (e.g . ye a r o f o c cu rre nc e ; se e F rie d m a n, 19 9 3 ). T h u s, a lth o ug h a c y clic lan d m a rk su c h a s a h o lid ay m a y h elp re sp o n de n ts loc a te in w h ich m o nth an e v en t o c cu rred , c on fu sio n m a y a rise a s to w h ich y e ar, a s th e c y clic la nd m ark d oe s no t pro v ide an y d istinc tive in fo rm a tio n co n ce rn in g th e ye a r. T h us, it m a y b e b est to fo cu s o n lin e ar la n dm a rk s fo r lo ng e r re c a ll pe riod s. P a ra lle l R etriev a l. T h e e ffe ctiv en e ss o f la n d m a rks la rge ly de p en d s o n the ir effe ctive n ess in c on ju rin g u p a sso cia te d info rm a tio n tha t re side s in oth er th em es or d o m a ins of o n e ’ s au tob iog ra p hic al e x pe rie n c e. F or e x am p le , o n e m a y b e a ble to re co n struc t th at n o tifica tion o f a life -th re ate n in g d ise ase c am e sh o rtly b efo re th e c ele bra tio n o f o ne ’ s c h ild ’ s b irth d ay b e ca u se th e b irth da y c e le b ratio n h a d be e n so m e w h at ta inte d b y th e n ew s. S im ilar ly , the rem em bra n c es o f e ve n ts in on e p artic u lar the m e m ay c o nju re u p rem em b ra n c es in o th e r th e m e s, b o th in te rm s o f w ha t ev e nts h ap p e n ed an d w he n . A ltho u g h re sp on d e nts a re lik e ly to
EVENT HISTORY CALENDARS
403
en g a ge in p ara lle l retrie v al sp o n tan e ou sly, th e q u ality o f re p ort m ay b e e ve n m o re en h a nc e d b y stru c tu ring th e in te rv ie w in g to e n co u rag e the use o f p a ra lle l retrie v al. S tru ctu ring th e oc c ur re n ce o f p a ra lle l retrie va l m a y b e ac c om plish ed e ith e r follo w in g or d u rin g the co m p le tio n o f th e c ale nd a r. E nc o ur ag ing p a ra lle l retrie v al c a n be d o n e b y e ng a g ing th e re sp on de n t in a c alen d a r rev iew in w h ic h the oc c ur re n ce an d tim in g o f e v en ts in th e v ario u s th e m e s c a n b e cro ss-c he ck e d ag a in st ea c h o th er, a n d m o difica tio n s to th e c ale nd a r en trie s ca n ac co m pa n y an y ad d itio n s o r ch a ng e s tha t the re spo n d en t m a y su g ge st (K essle r & W eth in g to n, 1 99 1 ). P a ra llel retriev a l c a n a lso b e en c o ura g ed b y direc tly fo c usin g th e resp o n d en ts’ a tte ntio n o n th e th em es an sw e red first in th e c ale n da r w h ile the y are w o rk in g o n th o se th em es p re se n ted la ter in th e in terv iew (F ric ke , S y ed , & S m ith, 19 8 6 ). T o be m o st e ffe c tiv e in th e u se o f th is strate gy (an d also to en c o ura g e sp o n tan eo u s p ara lle l re trie v al), th e th em es pre se nte d first m u st b e o ne s tha t a re like ly to be relate d to sub se q ue n t th em es. F ree d m a n e t al. (19 8 8 ) h ad the ir first tim elin e d ev o ted to c h an g e s in re sid e n ce . N o t on ly is th is tim e lin e o ne th at is relativ ely e asy fo r resp o n de n ts to a n sw er, an d o ne th at w ill a ssist in m o tiv a tin g th e re sp on d e nt to p ro vid e re sp on se s fo r o th e r tim e lin e s, b u t p lac es o f resid en c e is a lso in terre late d w ith o th er th e m e s su c h a s the relatio ns hip s th at on e h as h ad a n d th e w o rk a rran g em e nts th at ex ist ac ross th e re ca ll p erio d . A s a fin al th o u g ht, g iv e n th at au to b io g rap h ic a l k n o w le d ge is d ep e nd e n t o n co n c ep tion s o f the se lf, re se arc h ers m ay b e ab le to c ap ita lise o n the se selfco n c ep tion s w h ile e nc o u rag ing p a rallel re trie v al. P ro v id in g resp o n de n ts w ith lab els o f th e ro le s th a t the y ha d a ssu m e d d u rin g differ en t p e rio d s o f th e ir liv e s m a y se rv e as cu e s re g ard ing th e v a rio u s in terrela tio n sh ip s am o ng th e m e s. A s ex a m p le s, resp o nd e n ts m ay b e rem in de d o f w o rk -rela ted ev e nts tha t ha d o cc u rre d sh o rtly a fte r b e co m ing a pa ren t, or ch e ck s ca n b e m a d e tha t th eir b ec o m in g a su pe rv iso r a t w o rk w a s co n te m po ra ne o us w ith b e co m ing a sp o u se.
CONCLUSION R ec en t w o rk o n th e stru ctu re of a uto b io g rap h ica l m em or y su g ge sts th at th e rec all o f retro sp ec tiv e re po rts in surv e y s ca n b e im p rov e d b y usin g the m ultip le cu e s a n d p ath w ay s th a t a re a v aila ble w ith in th e a u to bio gra p hic a l m e m o ry n etw or k. T rad itio n a l su rv ey q ue stio n s d o n o t ca pitalise o n th e se a v ailab le c u es, as the y ten d to se g m e n t th e v a rio u s th em e s o f re sp on d en ts’ p a sts. E v en t h isto ry c a le n d a rs , o n t h e o t h e r h a n d , e n c o u r a g e re sp o n d e n ts t o a p p re c ia te th e inte rre late dn e ss o f v ario us th e m e s w h ich se rve to cu e m em orie s b oth w ithin an d a cro ss the se th e m e s. G iv en th e p o ten tial o f e v en t h isto ry ca le n d ars fo r im p rov in g th e a cc u rac y a n d c o m p lete ne ss o f su rv ey rep o rt, surv e y re sea rch e rs sh ou ld seriou sly co n side r the ir u se . D ire ct c o m p ariso n s in th e q ua lity o f resp o n de n t rep o rts be tw ee n tra d itio na l su rv e y qu e stion s a n d e v en t h isto ry c a len d ars a re la ck in g. Ind ire ct co m -
404
BELLI
pa riso n s, ho w e v er, do in dic ate th a t im p ro v em en ts a re like ly w ith ev en t h isto ry ca len d ars. In a dd itio n , th e b en e fits o f c ale n da rs ou g h t to b e m a x im ise d w ith va rio u s en h an c e m e nts ba se d o n w h at is k no w n to fa cilita te p e o ple ’ s a b ilities to ac c ura te ly re m e m b e r the ir p a sts. H o w ev e r, ad d itio n al re sea rc h n ee d s to b e c o n d u c t ed th a t d ire c tl y c o m p a re s th e q u a lity o f re s p o n s es g a in e d w ith tra ditio na l surv ey q u estio ns a n d e v en t histor y c alen d a rs, a nd w hic h also co m pa res th e c osts o f e ac h m eth od o lo gy , c on side rin g suc h a sp ec ts as th e tra in in g o f in terv iew e rs, inte rv ie w in g tim e, a n d th e c od in g a nd a na ly ses o f da ta . A sse ssin g c osts is im po rta nt be ca u se red u c tio n o f su rv ey erro rs is a lm o st alw ay s a sso c ia te d w ith so m e in c rea se in c osts (G ro v e s, 1 9 89 ). T h e u ltim ate suc c ess o f ev e nt h isto ry c ale n da rs w ill be ju dg e d b y w he the r im p ro v em en ts in re tros pe c tiv e rep o rts are sh ow n to b e co st-effe ctive in su rve y a dm in istratio n. F o r ex a m p le, e x p lo rato ry c o gn itiv e w o rk h a s sh o w n th at re tro sp e ctive rep o rts o f m u n d an e die ta ry ev e nts c an b e d ra m a tic a lly im p ro ve d by u sin g te ch n iqu e s tha t en c ou ra g e g rea te r ac c ess to c ue s tha n is typ ica l in su rv e y q u estio ns, b u t a t co n sid era ble c o st in in terv iew in g tim e (F ishe r & Q u ig le y , 1 9 9 2). O n th e o th e r ha n d, a n y im p rov e m e n ts in ac cu ra cy in th e u se o f e ve n t h isto ry ca len d ars w ill te n d to offse t suc h c o st in c rea se s, a s v a lid e stim ates o f p op u lation ch a ra c te ristic s ca n b e o b ta in e d w ith few e r resp o n de n ts th a n th o se n ee d ed w ith tra d itio na l surv e y q u e stio ns. In su m m ary , the po te ntial d eg ree o f im p ro v em en t in th e qu a lity of su rv ey re po rt ap p ea rs w ell situ a te d to e nsu re co st-c o n ta inm e n t, pa rtic u larly w h en th e surv ey top ics se ek the rep o rtin g o f th o se p ast ev e nts tha t ha v e a ffec ted p eo p le’ s liv e s in se ve ra l d iffe ren t w ay s.
REFERENCES A n d e rso n , R .C ., & P ic h e rt, J .W . (1 9 7 8 ). R e c a ll o f p re v io u s ly u n re c a ll ab le i n fo rm a tio n fo ll o w i n g a s h ift in p e rs p e c t iv e . J o u r n a l o f V e r b a l L e a rn in g a n d V e r b a l B e h a v io r, 1 7 , 1 ±1 2 . A n d e rso n , S .J ., & C o n w a y , M .A . (1 9 9 3 ) . In v e s ti g a t in g t h e s tru ct u re o f s p e c i fic a u to b i o g rap h i c al m e m o rie s . J o u r n a l o f E xp e r im e n ta l P sy c h o lo g y: L e a r n in g , M e m o r y , a n d C o g n itio n , 1 9 , 1 ±1 9 . B a c h m a n , J .G ., & O ’ M a lle y , P .M . (1 9 8 1 ). W h e n fo u r m o n th s eq u al a y e ar: In c o n s i st e n c ie s in s t u d e n t r ep o rts o f d ru g u se . P u b l ic O p in io n Q u a r t er ly , 4 5 , 5 3 6 ±5 4 8 . B a rs al o u , L .W . ( 1 9 8 8 ). T h e c o n t en t a n d o rg a n i za t io n o f a u t o b io g r ap h ic a l m e m o ries . In U . N e is s e r & E . W i n o g r ad (E d s .), R e m e m b e rin g r e co n si d e r e d : E c o l o g ic a l a n d tr a d i tio n a l a p p ro a ch e s to th e s t u d y o f m e m o r y (p p .1 9 3 ±2 4 3 ). N e w Y o rk : C a m b ri d g e U n iv e rs ity P re s s. B a rtle t t, J .C ., & S n e lu s , P . (1 9 8 0 ). L ife s p a n m e m o ry fo r p o p u l ar s o n g s . A m er i ca n J o u rn a l o f P s y ch o lo g y , 9 3 , 5 5 1 ±5 6 0 . B ra d b u rn , N ., R ip s, L .J ., & S h e v el l, S .K . (1 9 8 7 ). A n sw e rin g a u t o b io g ra p h ic a l q u e s tio n s: T h e i m p a c t o f m e m o ry a n d in fe re n c e o n s u rv e y s . S c ie n ce , 2 3 6 , 1 5 7 ±1 6 1 . B re w er , W .F . (1 9 8 6 ). W h a t is a u to b i o g rap h ic a l m e m o ry ? In D .C . R u b in (E d .), A u t o b io g r a p h ic a l m e m o ry (p p .2 5 ±4 9 ). N ew Y o rk : C a m b rid g e U n iv e rsi ty P re s s. B ro w n , N .R . (1 9 9 0 ). O rg a n i z at io n o f p u b l ic e v e n ts in lo n g -t e rm m e m o r y . J o u r n a l o f E x p er i m e n ta l P s y ch o lo g y : G en e r a l, 1 1 9 , 2 9 7 ±3 1 4 . B ro w n , N .R . (1 9 9 5 ). E st im a ti o n s t ra te g i e s a n d t h e ju d g m e n t o f e v e n t fre q u e n c y . Jo u r n a l o f E x p e r im e n ta l P s y c h o lo g y : L e a r n in g , M e m o r y, a n d C o g n it io n , 2 1 , 1 5 3 9 ±1 5 5 3 .
EVENT HISTORY CALENDARS
405
B ro w n , N .R ., R i p s , L .J ., & S h e v e ll , S .K . (1 9 8 5 ). T h e s u b je c t iv e d a t es o f n a tu ra l e v e n t s in v e ry -lo n g te rm m e m o ry . C o g n it iv e P sy c h o l o g y , 1 7 , 1 3 9 ±1 7 7 . B ro w n , N .R ., S h e v e ll , S .K ., & R ip s, L .J . (1 9 8 6 ). P u b l ic m e m o rie s a n d th ei r p e rs o n a l c o n te x t. In D .C . R u b in (E d .), A u to b i o g ra p h ic a l m e m o ry (p p .1 3 7 ±1 5 8 ). N e w Y o rk : C a m b ri d g e U n i v e rs it y P re s s . B u rto n , S ., & B l a ir, E . (1 9 9 1 ). T as k c o n d it io n s , re s p o n s e fo rm u la ti o n p ro ce s s e s , a n d re s p o n s e a cc u ra c y fo r b e h a v i o ra l fre q u e n c y q u e s ti o n s i n s u rv e y s . P u b l ic O p in io n Q u a rt e rly , 5 5 , 5 0 ±7 9 . C a n n e ll , C .F ., F i sh e r, G ., & B a k k e r, T . (1 9 6 5 ). R e p o rtin g o f h o s p ita li z ati o n in th e H e al th In t er v ie w S u rv e y . V ita l a n d H e a l th S t a t is ti cs (P H S P u b li c at io n N o . 1 0 0 0 , S e rie s 2 , N o . 6 ). W a sh in g to n , D C : U S G o v e rn m en t P r in t in g O ffic e . C a s h , W .S ., & M o s s, A .J . (1 9 7 2 ). O p t im u m re c a ll p eri o d fo r re p o rt in g p e rs o n s in ju r ed i n m o to r v e h ic le a cc i d e n ts . V it a l a n d H e a l th S ta tisti c s (D H E W P u b lic a ti o n N o . H S M 7 2 ±1 0 5 0 , S eri e s 2 , N o . 5 0 ). W a s h in g to n , D C : U S G o v e rn m en t P ri n t in g O ffic e . C a s p i , A ., M o ffi tt, T .E ., T h o rn to n , A ., F re e d m an , D ., A m e l l, J.W ., H a rrin g to n , H ., S m e ij er s, J ., & S il v a , P .A . (1 9 9 6 ). T h e li fe h i st o ry c al e n d a r: A re s e a rc h a n d c li n ic a l a s s e ss m e n t m e t h o d fo r c o l le c tin g ret ro s p e c tiv e e v e n t-h is to ry d a ta . In t e rn a tio n a l J o u rn a l o f M e th o d s in P s y ch ia tr ic R e s e a rc h , 6 , 1 0 1 ±1 1 4 . C o n w a y , M .A . (1 9 9 2 ). A s tru c tu ra l m o d e l o f a u t o b io g r ap h ic a l m e m o ry . In M .A . C o n w a y , D .C . R u b in , H . S p i n n le r, & W .A . W a g e n a ar (E d s .), T h e o r e tic a l p e r s p ec t iv e s o n a u to b io g ra p h ic a l m em o r y (p p .1 6 7 ±1 9 3 ). D o r d re c h t, N e th e rlan d s: K lu w e r. C o n w a y , M .A . (1 9 9 6 ). A u to b i o g rap h i c a l k n o w le d g e a n d a u to b i o g ra p h ic al m e m o rie s . In D .C . R u b i n (E d .), R e m em b e r in g o u r p a st : S tu d ie s in a u to b io g r a p h ica l m e m o r y (p p .6 7 ±9 3 ). N e w Y o rk : C a m b ri d g e U n iv e rs ity P re ss . C o n w a y , M .A ., & B e k er ia n , D .A . (1 9 8 7 ). O rg a n iz a tio n in a u to b i o g ra p h ic al m e m o ry . M em o r y & C o g n itio n , 1 5 , 1 1 9 ±1 3 2 . C o n w a y , M .A ., & R u b in , D .C . (1 9 9 3 ). T h e s tru ct u re o f a u t o b io g ra p h ic a l m e m o ry . In A .E . C o l lin s , S .E . G a th erc o le , M .A . C o n w a y , & P .E .M . M o rris (E d s .), T h e o r ie s o f m em o r y (p p .1 0 3 ±1 3 7 ). H o v e , U K : L a w re n c e E rl b a u m A s s o ci a te s L td . E l d e r, G .H . J r. (1 9 8 5 ). P e rs p e c ti v e s o n t h e life c o u rs e . In G .H . E l d e r J r. (E d .), L i fe co u rs e d y n a m i cs (p p .2 3 ±4 9 ). It h a c a , N Y : C o rn e l l U n i v e rs it y P re s s . F i sh e r, R .P ., & Q u i g l ey , K .L . (1 9 9 2 ) . A p p l y i n g c o g n it iv e th e o ry in p u b l ic h e a lt h in v e s t ig a t io n s: E n h a n c in g fo o d re c al l w i th t h e co g n i tiv e in te rv ie w . I n J.M . T a n u r (E d .), Q u es t io n s a b o u t q u e s tio n s (p p .1 5 4 ±1 6 9 ). N ew Y o rk : R u s s e l S a g e . F re e d m an , D ., T h o rn to n , A ., C a m b u r n , D ., A lw in , D ., & Y o u n g -D e M a rc o , L . (1 9 8 8 ). T h e l ife h i st o ry c a le n d a r: A t e c h n iq u e fo r c o l le c tin g re tro sp e c tiv e d a ta . In C .C . C lo g g (E d .), S o c io lo g ic a l m et h o d o l o g y (V o l. 1 8 , p p .3 7 ±6 8 ). S an F ra n c is c o : J o ss e y -B a s s. F ri ck e , T .E ., S y e d , S .H ., & S m ith , P .C . (1 9 8 6 ). R u ra l P u n ja b i s o ci a l o rg an iz a ti o n a n d m a rri a g e tim i n g s tra te g ie s i n P a k is ta n . D e m o g r a p h y , 2 3 , 4 8 9 ±5 0 8 . F ri ed m a n , W .J . (1 9 9 3 ). M e m o ry fo r th e t im e o f p a s t e v en ts . P sy c h o l o g ic a l B u ll et in , 1 1 3 , 4 4 ±6 6 . F u rs te n b er g , F .F . J r., B ro o k s -G u n n , J ., & M o rg a n , S .P . (1 9 8 7 ). A d o le s c en t m o t h e r s i n la te r li fe . N ew Y o rk : C a m b rid g e U n iv e rsi ty P res s . G ro v e s , R .M . (1 9 8 9 ). S u rv e y e r ro r s a n d s u r v e y c o s ts . N e w Y o rk : W ile y . H u t te n l o c h e r, J ., H ed g es , L ., & B ra d b u rn , N .M . (1 9 9 0 ). R e p o rts o f e la p s ed tim e : B o u n d in g a n d ro u n d i n g p r o c e s se s i n e st im a ti o n . J o u r n a l o f E x p e r im e n t a l P s y c h o lo g y: L e a rn in g , M em o r y , a n d C o g n itio n , 1 6 , 1 9 6 ±2 1 3 . J o b e , J .B ., T o u ra n g e a u , R ., &
S m i th , A .F . (1 9 9 3 ). C o n trib u tio n s o f s u rv ey
re se a rc h
to a n
u n d e rs t an d in g o f m e m o ry . A p p li e d C o g n it iv e P s yc h o lo g y , 7 , 5 6 7 ±5 8 4 . K e ss l er, R .C ., & W e th in g to n , E . (1 9 9 1 ). T h e re lia b il ity o f l ife ev e n t re p o rts i n a c o m m u n ity s u rv e y . P s y c h o lo g ic a l M e d i ci n e , 2 1 , 7 2 3 ±7 3 8 . L i n t o n , M . (1 9 8 2 ). T ra n s fo rm a ti o n s o f m e m o ry i n e v e ry d a y l ife . In U . N e is s e r (E d .), M e m o r y o b s e rv e d : R e m e m b e r in g i n n a t u r a l c o n te x ts (p p .7 7 ±9 1 ). S an F ra n c is c o : F re e m an .
406
BELLI
L in to n , M . (1 9 8 6 ). W a y s o f s e a rc h in g a n d th e c o n te n ts o f m e m o ry . In D .C . R u b in (E d .) , A u t o b io g ra p h ic a l m e m o r y (p p .5 0 ±6 7 ). N e w Y o rk : C a m b rid g e U n i v e rsi ty P re s s . L o ftu s, E .F ., & M a rb u rg er, W . (1 9 8 3 ) . S i n c e th e e ru p t io n o f M t. S t . H e le n s , h a s a n y o n e b ea t en y o u u p ? Im p ro v in g th e a cc u ra c y o f re t ro s p e c tiv e re p o rts w it h la n d m a rk e v e n ts . M e m o r y & C o g n itio n , 1 1 , 1 1 4 ±1 2 0 . L y k e ts o s , C .G ., N e s ta d t, G ., C w i, J., H e i th o ff, K ., & E a t o n , W .W . (1 9 9 4 ). T h e life c h a rt in te rv ie w : A s ta n d a rd iz e d m e th o d t o d e s c rib e t h e c o u rs e o f p s y c h o p a th o lo g y . In te r n a ti o n a l J o u r n a l o f M e th o d s in P s y c h i a t ri c R e s e a r c h , 4 , 1 4 3 ±1 5 5 . M a rk u s , H ., & N u riu s , P . (1 9 8 6 ). P o s s ib le se l v e s . A m e r ic a n P sy c h o l o g i st , 4 1 , 9 5 4 ±9 6 9 . M a th io w e tz , N . (1 9 8 6 ) . T h e p ro b le m o f o m is si o n s a n d t e le s c o p in g e rro r: N e w e v i d e n c e fro m a s t u d y o f u n e m p lo y m e n t . P r o ce e d in g s o f th e S e c ti o n o n S u r v e y R e s e a r c h M e t h o d s . W a s h in g t o n , D C : A m e ric a n S t at is ti ca l A s s o ci a tio n . M e a n s , B ., & L o ftu s , E .F . ( 1 9 9 1 ). W h e n p e rs o n a l h is to ry re p e a ts itse lf: D e c o m p o s in g m e m o ries fo r r ec u rrin g e v e n t s . A p p l ie d C o g n i tiv e P s y ch o lo g y , 5 , 2 9 7 ±3 1 8 . M e a n s , B ., N ig a m , A ., Z a rro w , M ., L o ftu s , E .F . & D o n a l d s o n , M .W . (1 9 8 9 ). A u to b i o g rap h i c al m e m o ry fo r h e a lth -re la te d e v e n ts . V it a l a n d H e a lth S ta tist ic s (D H H S P u b lic a t io n N o . P H S 8 9 1 0 7 7 , S e ri es 6 , N o . 2 ). W a s h in g to n D C : U S G o v e rn m e n t P rin ti n g O f fic e . M e n o n , G . (1 9 9 3 ). T h e e ffe c ts o f a c c e s si b i lilty o f i n fo rm a ti o n i n m e m o ry o n ju d g m e n t s o f b e h av io ra l fre q u e n ci e s. Jo u rn a l o f C o n s u m e r R e s e a rc h , 2 0 , 4 3 1 ±4 4 0 . M e n o n , G ., R a g h u b ir , P ., & S c h w a rz , N . (1 9 9 5 ). B e h a v io ra l fre q u en c y ju d g m e n ts: A n a c c e s s ib ility ± d ia g n o s ti ci ty fra m e w o rk . J o u r n a l o f C o n s u m e r R e s e a r c h , 2 2 , 2 1 2 ±2 2 8 . N ei s se r, U . (1 9 8 1 ). J o h n D ea n ’ s m em o ry : A c a s e s tu d y . C o g n it io n , 9 , 1 ±2 2 . N e i s s e r , U . ( 1 9 8 6 ). N e s t e d
stru ctu re
in
a u t o b i o g ra p h i c a l m e m o r y . I n
D .C . R u b i n
( E d .),
A u t o b io g ra p h ic a l m e m o r y (p p .7 1 ±8 1 ). N e w Y o rk : C a m b rid g e U n i v e rsi ty P re s s . N ei s se r, U . (1 9 8 8 ). W h a t is o rd i n a ry m e m o ry th e m e m o ry o f? In U . N ei s se r & E . W in o g ra d (E d s .), R e m e m b e r in g re c o n s i d e r e d : E c o l o g ic a l a n d t r a d it io n a l a p p r o a c h es t o th e s tu d y o f m e m o r y ( p p .3 5 6 ±3 7 3 ). N e w Y o rk : C a m b rid g e U n i v e rs it y P re s s . P il le m e r, D .B ., G o ld s m ith , L .R ., P a n te r, A .T ., & W h ite , S .H . (1 9 8 8 ). V e ry lo n g -te rm m e m o rie s o f t h e firs t y e a r i n c o l le g e. J o u r n a l o f E x p e ri m en ta l P s yc h o lo g y: L e a r n i n g , M e m o r y , a n d C o g n itio n , 1 4 , 7 0 9 ±7 1 5 . R o b in s o n , J .A . ( 1 9 8 6 ). T e m p o ra l re fe re n c e s y s te m s a n d a u to b i o g rap h ic a l m e m o ry . In D .C . R u b in ( E d .), A u t o b io g r a p h i c a l m e m o ry (p p .1 5 9 ±1 8 8 ). N ew Y o rk : C a m b ri d g e U n iv e rsi ty P re ss . R o b in s o n , J .A . (1 9 9 2 ). F irs t ex p e rie n c e m e m o rie s : C o n te x t s a n d fu n ct io n s i n p e rs o n a l h i st o ri e s. In M .A . C o n w a y , D .C . R u b i n , H . S p i n n le r, & W .A . W a g e n a a r (E d s .), T h e o r et ic a l p e r s p e c ti v es o n a u to b i o g r a p h ic a l m e m o r y (p p .2 2 3 ±2 3 9 ). D o rd re ch t, N e th e rla n d s : K lu w er . R o s c h , E . (1 9 7 8 ). P rin c ip le s o f c a te g o ri z at io n . In E . R o s ch & B .B . L l o y d (E d s .), C o g n itio n a n d c a te g o r i za ti o n (p p .2 5 ±4 9 ). H il ls d a le , N J : L a w r en c e E rlb a u m A s so c ia te s In c . R u b in , D .C ., & B a d d e le y , A .D . (1 9 8 9 ). T el e sc o p in g is n o t t im e c o m p re s s io n : A m o d e l o f t h e d a ti n g o f a u to b i o g ra p h ic al e v e n ts . M e m o r y & C o g n i tio n , 1 7 , 6 5 3 ±6 6 1 . S c h o o le r, J.W ., & H e rrm a n n , D .J . (1 9 9 2 ). T h e re is m o re t o e p i so d ic m e m o ry th a n ju s t e p i so d es . In M .A . C o n w a y , D .C . R u b i n , H . S p i n n le r, & W .A . W a g e n a a r (E d s .), T h e o r et ic a l p e r s p e c ti v es o n a u to b i o g r a p h ic a l m e m o r y (p p .2 4 1 ±2 6 1 ). D o rd re ch t, N e th e rla n d s : K lu w er . S c h w a rz , N ., &
S u d m a n , S . ( E d s .) (1 9 9 4 ). A u to b i o g r a p h i c a l m e m o r y a n d t h e v a li d i t y o f
r e tr o s p e c ti v e r e p o r ts . N e w Y o rk : S p rin g e r-V e rla g . S u d m a n , S ., & B ra d b u rn , N .M . (1 9 8 2 ). A sk i n g q u e s tio n s : A p r a c tic a l g u i d e to q u e s ti o n n a ir e d e s ig n . S a n F ran c is c o : J o s s e y -B a s s. T h o m p s o n , C .P ., S k o w ro n s k i, J.J ., L a rs e n , S .F ., & B e t z , A .L . (1 9 9 6 ). A u to b io g r a p h i ca l m e m o r y : R e m e m b e r in g w h a t a n d re m e m b e r in g w h e n . M a h w a h , N J: L a w re n c e E rl b a u m A s s o c iat es In c . T h o m p s o n , C .P ., S k o w ro n sk i , J .J ., & L e e , D .J . (1 9 8 8 ) . T el e sc o p in g i n d a tin g n a tu ra lly o c c u rri n g e v e n t s . M e m o ry & C o g n it io n , 1 6 , 4 6 1 ±4 6 8 .
M E M O R Y , 1 9 9 8 , 6 (4 ), 4 0 7 ±4 2 6
``D o n ’ t K n o w ’ ’ R e sp o n s e s in S u r v e y s : I s W h a t I K n o w W h a t Y o u W a n t to K n o w a n d D o I W a n t Y o u to K n o w It? P a u l B e a tty N a tio n al C en te r fo r H ea lth S ta tistic s, U S A
D o u g la s H e rrm a n n Ind ia na S tate U n ive rsity, U S A
C a th y P u sk a r B u re a u o f L a b o r S ta tistics, U SA
Je ffre y K e rw in W e sta t, U S A
R es po n se s to su rv e y q u e s tion s a re as su m e d to b e b a se d o n w h at r e sp on d e nts c an ac tua lly d r aw f ro m m e m or y . F or e x a m p le , if re sp o n d e n ts r ep o rt en g ag ing in so m e b eh a v io u r a c e rtain nu m b e r of tim e s, w e a ss um e th at a s ub st a ntiv e a n sw e r re fle cts w h at th e y r e ally k no w . C o nv e rs ely , w he n re sp o nd e n ts s ay tha t th ey `` do n ’ t k n o w ’ ’ ( D K ) th e an sw e r , it is b e liev e d th a t th e ir r es po n se r ef le c ts a la ck of m e m o r y r e le v a n t to th e q ue s tio n . H o w e ve r , s ur v ey r e sp o nd in g is n o w un d er st oo d to b e a h ig h ly c o m p le x p ro c es s. I n th is a rtic le , w e p ro p os e a fr am ew o rk to ac c o un t fo r th e k in d o f r e po rts m a d e b y r e sp on d en ts to a s ur ve y . T he f ra m e w or k h o ld s th at r es p o n de n t r e po rts ar e ba se d o n th re e fa c to rs : w h a t th e r es p on d en t a c tu a lly k no w s (th e p er so n ’ s `` c og n itiv e s ta te ’ ’ ); w he th e r th e re sp o nd e n t b e liev e s th a t th e p ote ntia l a n s w er m e e ts th e re q uire m e n ts of th e qu e st io n (a n ` `a de q u ac y jud g em en t’ ’ ) ; an d w h eth er the re sp o nd e nt c h oo se s to pr ov ide th is a n sw e r (the p e r so n’ s `` co m m u n ic a tive in te n t’ ’ ) . S u b se qu e ntly , th e ar tic le ex a m in e s h o w r e le v an t f in d in g s in th e lite r atur e s u pp o rt th e f ra m e w o rk , an d th e n ev a lu a te s the a s su m p tion s m ad e a bo u t c o gn itive s ta te s in ligh t of th e re su lts o f tw o e x pe r im e n ts . T h e lite r atur e a nd re se a rc h p r es en ted d e m o n st ra te th a t su rv e y re sp on d in g ca n b e ac c o u n te d fo r b y a fr a m e w o r k tha t as su m e s re sp o nd in g is b a se d o n c er ta in k e y c o g nitive pr oc e ss es .
R e q u e s ts f o r re p ri n t s s h o u ld b e s e n t t o D o u g la s H e rrm a n n , In d ia n a S t a te U n iv e rs ity , D e p a rtm e n t o f P s y ch o lo g y , T e rre H a u t e, In d ia n a 4 7 8 0 9 , U S A .
Ó
1 9 9 8 P s y ch o lo g y P re s s L td
408
BEATTY ET AL.
INTRODUCTION T ra dition a lly , rese a rc h e rs h av e a ssu m e d th at re sp on se s to su rv ey q ue stio n s are ba se d o n w h a t re sp o nd e nts c a n ac tua lly d raw fro m m e m o ry . T h at is, if a re sp o n de n t re p orts en g ag in g in som e b e ha v iou r a c ertain n um b er o f tim e s, w e a ssu m e t h a t a su b s ta n tiv e a n s w e r re fle c t s w h a t th e y re a lly k n o w ; a n d co n se qu e ntly , w h en a re sp o nd e nt p rov id es a ``d o n ’ t k n o w ’ ’ (D K ) re sp on se , it re flec ts a lac k of m e m ory re le v an t to the q ue stio n . W e rea liz e no w th at su rve y re sp on d ing is a p ote n tia lly c om p le x p roc ess in v o lv in g c og n itiv e sta g e s su ch as co m p re h en sion , re triev a l, ju d ge m e n t, a n d re sp o n se (T ou ran g e au , 1 9 8 4; T o ura n ge a u & R a sin ski, 1 9 88 ; W illis, R o y sto n , & B e rc in i, 1 9 9 1). Id ea lly , resp o n de n ts p rov id e a sub sta ntiv e re sp o nse w h e n the y kn o w the a n sw er to the q u estio n, a nd p ro vid e a D K re sp o nse w h en th ey d o n ot. H o w e ve r, a pp lyin g w h at w e h av e lea rne d a b ou t th e re sp o nse p ro ce ss, w e se e th a t the re is n o t ne ce ssa rily d irec t c orre spo n d e nc e b etw ee n w h a t a resp o n d en t kn o w s an d w ha t a resp o n d en t re p or ts. W e p rop o se th a t w h a t a re sp o nd e nt rep o rts is d riv en by th re e fa c to rs:
· · ·
W h at th e re spo n d en t ac tu ally k n ow s, or the ``c og n itiv e sta te ’ ’ . W h eth er th e re spo n d en t be lie v e s th at th e po ten tial an sw e r m ee ts th e req u ire m en ts o f the q ue stion , o r an ``a de q ua c y ju d ge m e n t’ ’ . W h eth er th e resp o n d en t ch o ose s to p ro v id e th is an sw e r, o r th e ``co m m u nic ative in te n t’ ’ .
W e e x p la in e ac h o f th e se fa cto rs in tu rn, as a b a sis fo r b u ild ing a larg e r fra m ew o rk fo r un de rsta n din g th e b asis su rv ey re sp o nd in g , e sp ec ially as it b ea rs on D K resp o n ses a n d gu e ssin g . T h is fra m e w or k, w h ich w e refe r to as th e R e sp o nse B asis F ram ew o rk , w ill b e th e b asis fo r th e e x pe rim e nt w e d iscu ss in th e sec o n d h a lf o f th e pa p er.
THE RESPONSE BASIS FRAMEWORK Cognitive States W e su g g est th a t info rm a tion o n w hic h re sp on d en ts dra w to a n sw er surv e y qu e stio n s c an be c la ssifie d in te rm s of fo u r c og n itiv e re c a ll state s (B ea tty & H e rrm an n , 19 9 5 ; H a she r & G riffin, 19 7 8 ; H errm an n , 1 98 6 , 1 9 95 ; R e d er, 19 8 7 a,b , 1 98 8 ). T h ese sta tes a re: 1 . A va ila b le: T h e req u este d in fo rm a tio n is kn o w n an d av a ila b le w ith n o ap p are n t e ffort. 2 . A cc ess ib le: T h e re q ue sted in fo rm atio n is k n ow n b u t is no t in sta ntly av a ila b le Ð effo rt from resp o n de n t or inte rv ie w er p ro b in g m ay b e re qu ire d fo r re c a ll.
``DON’T KNOW’’ RESPONSES IN SURVEYS
409
3. G en era tab le: T h e req u e ste d in fo rm a tio n is n o t e x ac tly k n o w n , bu t th e re s p o n d e n t h a s e n o u g h in fo r m a t io n i n m e m o r y to m a k e a re a s o n a b le ap p ro x im ation . 4. Ig no ran t: T h e req u este d in fo rm a tio n is n o t kn o w n , a nd th ere is no b asis to ap p ro x im ate th is in fo rm a tio n . O bv io us ly , c o g nitive sta te p la y s an im p o rtan t role in d e te rm in ing w h a t a resp o n d en t sa y s h e or sh e k n ow s in re sp on se to a q ue stio n . In th e first c o gn itiv e state (a va ila b le ), th e resp o n de n t k n ow s th e a nsw e r to th e q u estio n, b y de fin ition ; in the fou rth c o gn itiv e sta te (ig n o ran t), th e re sp o nd e nt d o es n ot k no w o r a t b e st, co u ld on ly gu e ss w ild ly . In th e tw o in te rm e d iate sta te s, th e resp o nd e nt h a s info rm a tio n th a t c o uld be use d to a nsw e r th e q u estio n . B u t th e c o g nitive sta te is o nly th e ba sisÐ th e ac tu al re sp on se is d e te rm in e d by sev er al o the r fa cto rs (E isen h o w e r, M a thio w e tz , & M o rg an stein , 1 9 91 ; G ro ve s, 1 9 89 ).
Adequacy Judgements A n a de q u ac y ju d ge m en t is n ec essa ry w h e n a po ten tia l re sp o nse co n tain s u nc e rta inty , e stim ation , o r gu e ssin g Ð i.e. w h en th e re sp on d en t’ s k n ow led g e falls in on e o f th e ``in term ed iate ’ ’ co g n itiv e states, a cc e ssible o r g en e rata ble (T o u ran g e au , 1 98 4 ; Job e & H e rrm an n , 19 9 6 ). In th ose sta tes, a resp o nd e n t ca n p ro v ide so m e info rm a tio n , b u t it m a y no t be c le ar w h e th e r th is in fo rm a tio n m e ets th e req u ire m en ts o f th e qu e stio n . C o n sid e r, fo r e x am ple , a q u estio n tha t ask s ``In the las t se v en d a ys, h o w m a n y tim e s d id yo u d rink o ran g e ju ic e? ’ ’ T h e resp o n d en t m a y no t b e a b le to re m e m be r this info rm a tion e x ac tly , b u t m a y kn o w tha t (s)h e u su ally d rink s juic e w ith b re a kfa st e v ery da y , an d be in c lin e d to a n sw e r ``s ev en tim e s’ ’ . B e c au s e th e re s p o n d e n t k n o w s th is is o n ly a n ap p ro x im ation , a de cisio n is re q uire d : w o uld it b e be st to a d m it th at (s)h e litera lly d oe s no t k n o w , o r w o u ld p rov id in g th e ``b est’ ’ p o ssible a nsw e r b e p re fera b le? T h is d e cisio n w ill b e b a sed o n a ju d g em e nt o f th e lev e l of p re c isio n tha t is ca lled for. N o te th at this d ec isio n m a y be qu ite d ifficu lt if the su rv e y q ue stio n a sks for c o m p lic a te d in fo rm a tion , or p ro v id e s in su fficien t g u id a n ce a s to th e le ve l o f ce rta inty th at q ua lifie s as a leg itim ate an sw e r. R esp o n de n ts w ith eq u a l le v els o f ce rta inty a b ou t th eir a n sw er co u ld m a k e d iffere n t de c isio n s a bo u t the a d eq u ac y o f th e resp o n se. S o m e m ay fe e l th a t a D K re spo n se is m o re litera lly co rrec t; o the rs m a y fe el th a t D K s sho u ld b e a vo id ed , a n d th at an y su bsta ntiv e a n sw er is b e tte r th a n n o n e, ev e n if it p rob a b ly is n o t co rrec t.
Communicative Intent W h e th e r o r no t re spo n d en ts fe el th at th ey h a ve su ffic ie nt k n ow le dg e to p ro v ide a n ad e q ua te an sw e r to the surv ey qu e stio n , th e y m a y o r m ay no t a c tu a lly c h oo se to rep o rt it (D e M aio , 19 8 4 ; H ip p ler, S c hw a rz, & S u dm an , 1 9 87 ; S u c hm an & Jo rd a n, 1 99 0 ). W e refe r to the d ec isio n of w h at to re po rt a s c o m m un ic ative inte nt. S o c ia l
410
BEATTY ET AL.
de sirab ility m a y be o n e influ e nc e o n c om m u n ica tiv e in te n t. F o r e x am ple , su rv e y qu e stio n s m ay a sk re spo n d en ts to rev e a l th a t th e y h av e p o or e x erc ise ha b its, en g ag e in risk y be h av iou r su ch as d ru g use , a n d so o n . A re sp on d en t m a y b e ca p ab le o f pro v id in g a n an sw e r tha t (s)h e be lie v es to be c o m p lete ly ac ce p ta b le, bu t ch o o se n o t to rep o rt it o u t o f em b arra ssm e n t o r la c k o f tru st in co n fide n tia lity (T u rn er, 1 9 8 2). O ne w ay to av o id re po rting su ch in fo rm atio n w o u ld b e to p lea d ig n o ran c e a n d sim ply re po rt th a t on e d oe s n o t k n o w . M o tiv a tio n m ay a lso be a fa c to rÐ th e re sp o nd e nt m a y re a lise th a t a nsw e rin g th e qu e stio n is p ossib le b ut tha t pro v id in g an ad e qu a te resp o n se w o u ld b e tim e co n sum in g a n d m en tally ta xin g (C a nn e ll & H en so n, 1 9 74 ). P lea d ing ig no ran c e co u ld o cc u r fo r tha t re a so n a lso . O n th e o the r h an d , it is p ossib le tha t a re spo n d en t m a y re a lly no t kn o w th e an sw e r to a q u estion , b ut fe el tha t a dm itting ig n ora n c e is so m e h ow un d esira b le , a n d th e re fo re p ro vid e an un tru th fu l su b stan tive resp o n se.
Response Paths and Response Errors W e have sugg ested that c ognitive states, ad equacy judgem ents, an d co m m unica tive inten t collectively determ in e w h ether a resp onden t pro vide s a substan tive re spo nse , a superficia l re sp onse, or a D K respon se. Pre vio us m od els and fram ew ork s do sh ow tha t resp onses m ay b e depen dent on cog nitive states, adequ acy judg em e nts, an d com m un icative intent (o r equivale nt concep ts) (e.g . C annell, M iller, & O kse nberg, 1981; M u llin, C onrad, Sand er, & H e rrm an n, 1 994; see Jobe & H errm ann , 19 96, fo r m o re detailed disc ussio n). H ow e ver, those fram ew ork s do not sh ow ho w the cogn itive states m en tioned ea rlier can le ad to diffe ren t re sp o nse o utco m e s (w hich w e call ``resp onse pa th s’ ’ ). A lth ou gh cognitive state necessa rily influe nces the likeliho od of sub stantive resp onses and D K s, Fig. 1 sh ow s th at any cog nitive state can lead to either response outcom e. R esp onse p aths are sho w n a s a rrow s, con necting the re spo nden t’ s c ognitive state (left side) w ith the response outco m e (rig ht side). P aths are labe lled by th eir origin s and endp oin ts; thus the path from the first cogn itive state (``availab le’ ’ ) to a D K is ``1 D ’ ’ , w hile the path to a su bstantive response is ``1R ’ ’ , and so on. N ote that som e o f these path s represent truthful re spo nse s, w hile o thers repre sent erro rs. R e sea rc he rs o bv io u sly d e sire tru th ful re spo n ses . If resp o n de n ts h av e th e kn o w led g e th a t th e surv e y qu e stio n c alls fo r, w h ic h is a lw a y s th e c ase in th e ``a v a ilab le’ ’ co g nitive sta te , th e m o st d esira ble o utc o m e w ou ld b e a tru th fu l sub sta ntiv e re sp o nse (H ip ler & S c hw a rtz , 19 8 9 ). S im ilarly , if resp o n de n ts d o n o t ha v e an y b asis fo r an sw e rin g , a s in th e ``ig n ora n t’ ’ c o gn itiv e state , th e id ea l ou tc om e w o u ld b e a D K . H o w e ve r, re spo n d en ts’ an sw e rs do n o t n e ce ssar ily re flec t w h a t th e y re ally k n ow (B ra d b urn , R ip s, & S h e ve ll, 19 8 7 ). If resp o n de n ts do n ot p ro vid e inf orm ation tha t th ey c o uld pro v id e , this is a n e x am p le o f a n erro r of o m issio n w h ich is la be lle d ``O ’ ’ on F ig . 1 (e .g . see P a th 1D ). If re sp o n de n ts p rov id e u ntru th fu l info rm a tion , this is erro r of co m m issio n , w hic h is lab e lle d ``C ’ ’ o n F ig. 1 (e .g . se e Pa th 4 R ).
FIG. 1.
S t a te -re s p o n s e m ap p in g fo r fo u r c o g n itiv e s ta te s .
411
412
BEATTY ET AL.
C o m m u n ic ativ e in ten t ca n b e a n im p ortan t d e te rm in a nt o f b oth k in d s o f erro rs. N eg a tiv e c o m m u n ica tiv e in te ntÐ i.e . a de sire to tell le ss th a n th e tru th th ro u gh eithe r co m m issio n o r o m issio n Ð co u ld arise fro m lo w m o tiv a tio n (K ro sn ick , 1 9 9 1), so cial d e sira b ility (D eM a io, 1 98 4 ), c o nfid en tiality c o nc ern s, (G fro e re r, G u stin, & T u rn er, 1 99 2 ), or o th er fa cto rs. In fa c t, c om m u n ica tiv e in ten t is the o n ly re aso n ab le ex p lan a tio n fo r e rro rs of o m issio n an d c o m m issio n in the ``ex tre m e’ ’ c og n itiv e sta te s (``a va ilab le’ ’ an d ``ig n or an t’ ’ ). In tho se sta tes, it is sim p le to see th e p a ths th at m e et re sea rc he rs’ o bje ctiv es (1 R , 4D ) a n d th o se th a t d o no t (1 D , 4 R ). G e n e ra lly , h o w e ve r, k no w le dg e ab o ut p erso n al b eh a vio u r is n o t so ab so lu te Ð a ns w ering q u estio ns e ith er req u ire s n o te w orth y e ffort (th e ``a c ce ssible ’ ’ state ) o r u se o f a n e stim ation stra teg y (th e ``ge n e ra tab le ’ ’ sta te). F re q ue n c y o f v isits to a d o cto r’ s o ffice or o the r co m m o n ac tiv itie s m ay n o t b e kn o w n e x ac tly , alth ou g h in a ll lik elih o o d re spo n d en ts h a v e som e rele va n t in fo rm a tio n ab o u t th e m in m e m o ry . T h ey m u st m ak e a ju d ge m e n t ab o u t w h e th e r th e ir im p rec ise info rm ation ju stifie s a n an sw er to th e q ue stio n (S c h le n ke r, 19 8 6 ). T h u s, re spo n d en ts w ith e x ac tly th e sam e de g ree o f k no w le dg e co u ld m a k e d iffe ren t d e cisio ns a b ou t w h ich re spo n se o p tio n is ap p ro p ria te . N o te tha t pa th s 2 R , 2 D , 3R , a nd 3 D c o u ld all b e co n sid e red tru th ful resp o nse s d ep e n din g on th e resp o n de n t’ s ad e qu a c y ju d g em en t. If a re sp on d en t b e lie ve s th a t on ly pre c ise info rm a tio n sh ou ld b e rep o rted , th en a D K m ig h t be c orre ct. O n the o th e r ha n d, a n oth e r re sp o nd e nt m igh t thin k tha t a ``b e st gu e ss’ ’ is pe rfec tly re aso n a ble fo r p u rp o se s of a surv e y re sp o nse . W e sum m arise th e ro le o f co g n itiv e sta te s, ad e qu a c y ju d ge m en ts, a n d co m m u n ic a tiv e in ten t in re sp on d in g to su rv e y q ue stion s in F ig . 2. T h e p roc ess be g ins w ith th e fo rm u la tio n o f a po ten tial resp o n se to the q u estio n . In c o gn itiv e sta tes 1 an d 4 , c om m u n ica tiv e in te n t d e te rm in es w h eth er this resp o n se is pro v id ed . T h ose w ith tru th ful inte nt p ro vid e eithe r an a nsw e r o r a leg itim ate D K , an d tho se w ith u ntru thfu l co m m u n ic a tiv e in ten t c an c om m it eithe r e rro rs o f om ission w ith a D K (p lea d in g ign o ran c e ) o r co m m issio n (a n un tru th fu l su b s ta n ti v e re s p o n s e ; a su p e rfi c ia lly s u b st a n t iv e a n s w e r f o r w h ic h t h e re sp o n de n t ha s n o in fo rm a tio n ). W he n rele va n t in fo rm a tio n is n eith e r p rec ise ly kn o w n n o r u n k no w n , a s in c o gn itiv e sta te s 2 an d 3, th e a de q u ac y ju dg e m e n t pre c ed e s th e d ec ision of co m m u n ic a tiv e in te n t. If a resp o n de n t c on sid e rs a re sp o n se to b e ad e q ua te , th en a su b stan tive re sp on se is tru th fu l; a n d if th e re sp o n de n t do e s n o t, th en a D K is tru th fu lÐ a t lea st b ase d o n th e resp o n d en t’ s un d er sta n din g o f th e q u estio n re qu irem e nts.
ACCEPTING AND NOT ACCEPTING DK RESPONSES T h e R e s p o n s e B a s is F ra m e w o rk , if v a lid , sh o u ld b e a u se fu l to o l fo r un d er sta n din g h o w resp o n de n ts c ho o se b e tw e en pro v id in g su bsta n tiv e an sw e rs an d D K s. R e sea rc h ers m ay k e ep th is R esp o ns e B a sis fra m ew o rk in m in d w he n
FIG. 2.
D e c is io n m o d e l fo r e x p re s s io n o f p o te n tia l re s p o n se .
413
414
BEATTY ET AL.
de c idin g w h e th e r to en c ou ra g e o r disc ou ra g e D K re sp o nse s. So m e re sea rch e rs m a y w a n t sub stan tiv e re spo n se s on ly if re sp on d e nts a re v e ry c o nfid en t o f th e ac cu ra c y o f th e ir an sw e rs, w h e rea s oth ers m a y fee l th at ev en a w ild g u e ss is lik ely to ha v e so m e v alu e an d is p refe rab le to a D K . S o m e rese arc h ers fav o u r disc o ura g in g D K re sp on se s to fa c tu a l q u e stio n s, n o t o nly b ec a use th ey re d uc e effe ctive sa m p le siz es (S c hu m a n & P re sser, 19 8 1 ), b u t a lso b e ca u se se v era l stu d ies h av e sh o w n th at va lua b le info rm a tio n m igh t ha v e b ee n o b tain ab le if re sp o n de n ts h a d e x erte d a dd itio n al e ffo rt (C a nn e ll, O k se nb e rg , & C on v e rse, 19 7 9 ) o r if in terv iew e rs ha d p ro be d th e m in g re a te r d e ta il (M artin, 19 8 6 ). Y e t oth e r rese a rch e rs h av e po in te d o u t lim ita tio n s of re sp o n de n ts’ a bility to re c all in fo rm a tio n a nd th e p o te n tia l for resp o nse d istortio n (H e rrm a n n, 1 9 8 6, 1 9 93 , 19 9 5 ; B ra db u rn et al., 19 8 7 ). R e sea rc he rs m a y u se sev era l te c h niq ue s to in flue n ce h o w ea sy o r diffic u lt it is fo r re sp on d en ts to pro v ide D K re spo n ses , b ase d o n th eir d ata req u ire m en ts. If a D K resp o n se is o ffe re d e xp licitly to a re spo n d en t, th is c rea tes a ``filter’ ’ (b e c au se it filte rs sub je cts a w a y from su bsta n tiv e re sp o nse s). F ilte rin g c an b e do n e in v ary in g d e gre e sÐ fo r e xa m p le , a ``full filte r’ ’ allo w s a re sp o nd e nt to sa y th a t (s)he kn o w s n o th in g a b ou t a to p ic b e for e th e q u estio n is e v en a sk ed , w h e re as a ``q u asi-filte r’ ’ sim p ly pre sen ts ``D K ’ ’ as a leg itim ate a n sw e r to th e qu e stio n . In o the r c ase s (a n on -filte re d fo rm ), th e D K op tion is n o t ex p lic itly sta ted (S ch u m an & P re sse r, 1 9 81 ). B u t ev e n h e re , resp o n d en ts are lik e ly to pro v id e D K s som etim e s. R e se arc h ers c a n a dd ress su ch re sp on ses by a cc e p tin g th e m , o r b y fu rth er p ro be s or m em ory c ue s. It is a m atte r of d eg re e h o w e asy o r difficu lt it ca n b e to p rov id e a D K .
Error Control Strategies F ilters a re u se d un d er th e assu m ptio n th at p rese n tin g D K s as a leg itim ate altern a tiv e w ill e n co u rag e m o re resp o nd e n ts to u se th em as a n ``ou t’ ’ . T h e m o re ex tre m e th e filte r, th e m ore pe o ple w ill pre su m a b ly re po rt D K . T h u s if a re se a rc h er on ly w a nte d su bsta ntiv e an sw e rs from re sp on d e nts w h o w e re ce rtain th a t th e y w ere p ro v id in g v ery a c cu rate resp o n ses, (s)h e m igh t c on sid er u sin g fu ll filters a nd n ev e r p ro bin g D K s. T h is stra te g y is a n attem pt to re du c e e rrors o f co m m issio n . A n alte rn a tiv e stra teg y w o u ld be to a v oid e x plic it m e ntion o f D K a s a re sp o n se o p tio n , a nd in ste a d to rep e ate dly p ro b e all D K s. T h is stra teg y w ou ld en c ou ra g e resp o n d en ts to g iv e sub stan tiv e an sw e rs u n d er w id e circ um sta n ce s, w h e th er th ey w e re pre cise a n sw e rs o r w ild g u ess es. T h is strate gy w o u ld be a n attem p t to re d uc e erro rs of o m ission . C o llec tiv ely , w e refe r to th ese re sea rch d esig n d ec isio n s a s ``e rro r c o ntro l stra teg ies’ ’ . It is im p orta nt to p o in t o u t tha t th e ch o ic e o f a stra teg y in ev itab ly in v o lv e s tra de -o ffs. F o r e x am p le, su p po se a rese arc he r w an ts to e lim in a te erro rs of co m m issio n a nd d e cid e s to le gitim ize D K th ro u g h filtere d q ue stio n s. T h is
``DON’T KNOW’’ RESPONSES IN SURVEYS
415
d e sig n d e cisio n c o u ld a lso in a d v erte n tly c o nv in ce re sp o n de n ts th at th e ir k no w led g e is insu ffic ien t to justify an sw e rin g th e qu e stio nÐ re sp on d en ts w h o m a y o th erw ise h av e pro v id e d sub stan tive in fo rm a tio n . A lte rn ativ e ly , th e filte rs co u ld e n co u ra ge le ss m o tiv a te d resp o n de n ts to ta k e D K as a n ``e a sy o u t’ ’ . T h us, this attem pt to de c re a se erro rs o f co m m issio n , if too ex trem e, c o uld in c rea se erro rs of o m issio n . A ltern a te ly , rese arc h ers m ay d ec id e to p ro b e a ll D K re sp on se s in a n a tte m p t to co n v ert th em to su b stan tiv e re sp on se s. H o w e ve r, re spo n d en ts so m e tim e s an sw e r su rve y qu e stio n s w h en th e y h a ve little b asis to do so (S ch u m an & P resse r, 1 9 81 ; B ish o p , T u ch fa rbe r, & O ld e nd ic k, 1 98 6 ). T h is erro r co n tro l stra teg y c o u ld in ad v e rte n tly e n co u ra ge m ea n in gle ss resp o n ses b y sign a llin g tha t D K is u n ac c ep tab le. T h u s, the a ttem p t to d ec rea se erro rs o f o m issio n c ou ld inc rea se erro rs o f c o m m issio n.
Implications of the Response Basis Framework T his the oretica l fra m ew o rk ha s sev eral im plic atio ns fo r surve y research design. It sugg ests, first of all, the im p orta nce of carefu lly selectin g e rror c ontrol stra te gie s, w ith a fu ll un dersta nd ing of th e p otentia l trad e-offs inv olved in attem p ts to m in im ise e rrors o f om ission and c om m issio n. T h e fram e w ork ca lls for resea rc hers to c arefully c on side r th eir d ata n eed s (e .g . ho w sure sho uld respon de nts b e of the ir an sw ers in o rd er to prov id e substantiv e respo nses?). T h ese d ecision s nee d to be pa rtia lly b ased on an u nde rstand in g of the cog nitive states that respo nd ents tend to fa ll into. F or ex am p le, if respo nses ten d to b e ``a cce ssible’ ’ in m em o ry re ga rd in g a ce rtain top ic (bu t no t instantly ava ilab le), it m ay b e p ossib le to o btain high -q ua lity data throu gh prim ing m em o ries to aid rec all o r o th er prob in g. If re spon ses te nd to be ``ge ne ratab le ’ ’ , resea rc hers m ig ht re w o rk qu estion s so th at th ey m ea su re sim p ler c on cep ts. D ecisio ns reg arding th e exten t o f filterin g cou ld be b ased o n an u nde rstand in g of re sp on den ts’ c og nitive sta te s. T h e R e spo n se B asis F ram ew o rk a lso su gg e sts th at re se arc h ers sho u ld b e a s ex p lic it a s p o ssib le in d efin ing th e le ve l of p rec isio n tha t q u alifie s as a n ``ad eq u a te’ ’ re sp o nse . W e b e lie ve th a t v ery often resp o n de n ts p articip ate in su rv e y s w itho u t a c le a r u n de rsta n d in g o f ho w pre cise th eir a n sw ers sho u ld b e, an d m ak e su c h d ec ision s a rb itrar ily . A s w e ha v e sh ow n , re spo n d en ts w ith th e sam e le v el o f k no w led g e co u ld c o n ce iv a b ly c h o ose d iffe ren t resp o n se p a th s, w ith b o th b e lie vin g tha t the y a n sw e red c o rrec tly . In stru ctio ns in d ic a tin g tha t ``be st e stim ates a re a c ce p ta b le’ ’ o r ``if y ou ca n ’ t re m e m b e r e x ac tly , just sa y so ’ ’ m a y be q u ite u se fu l. A lso , th e fram e w o rk su g ge sts the im p o rta n c e of c o nsid er in g c om m u n ica tiv e inte nt in a n sw e rin g . R e sea rch e rs c a n m a x im ise tru thfu l c o m m un ic ative in ten t b y k ee p in g th e re sp on se b u rd en re a so na b le (C a n n ell e t a l., 1 98 1 ) an d p a yin g atten tion to p ro ce d u re s fo r c o lle cting d a ta on se nsitiv e top ic s (G fro ere r et al., 1 99 2 ; W illis, S irke n , & N a tha n , 1 99 4 ).
416
BEATTY ET AL.
Validating the Response Basis Framework T h e fo llo w ing ex p erim e n ts a re a p re lim ina ry a tte m p t to v a lid ate so m e co n ce p ts ex p resse d in th e fram e w o rk fo r u nd e rstan d in g ho w re spo n d en ts d eriv e the ir an sw e rs to su rv ey q u estio n s. If th e fra m e w o rk is to be a u sefu l to o l fo r g u idin g de c isio n s ab o u t c orre ct resp o n ses, g u e ssing , a n d D K s, it is im p ortan t to sh o w th a t it is p ossib le to id e n tify the co g n itive sta tes of re sp o n de n ts. U ltim ate ly , it is also im po rtan t to sh o w th at th e re sp on d e nt’ s le v el of kn o w le d g e, a lon g w ith pe rc eiv ed crite ria for ad e q ua te resp o n ses an d c o m m u nic ative in ten t, ca n b e ap p lie d to p red ict resp o n d in g . T h e fo c us o f th e se e x p erim e nt s is to test so m e o f th e assu m p tio n s o f th e R e sp o nse B a sis F ra m ew o rk Ð in p articu lar, tho se re ga rd in g c o gn itiv e state s (th e o th e r a ssu m p tio n s o n ad e qu a cy ju dg e m e n ts a n d co m m u n ic a tiv e in ten t w ill b e te ste d in futu re re sea rc h ). E x p e rim en t 1 inv e stig ate d w h eth er su b jec ts c o u l d id e n tif y w h ic h c o g n i tiv e sta t e s w e re in v o k e d b y v a r io u s s u rv e y qu e stio n s, a n d w he th er th e re p o rte d co g n itive sta te w o uld v a ry in e xp e c te d pa tte rn s. E x p e rim en t 2 in ve stig a te d fu rthe r w he th er the fo u r co g n itive state s ca n be vie w e d as a sc ala r o f kn o w a bility (i.e . lik e lih o o d tha t a resp o n d en t kn o w s, or is c a pa b le o f k n o w in g , th e in fo rm a tio n req u e ste d b y a surv e y qu e stio n ). T his e xp e rim en t ex a m in ed h o w ra tin g s of ``co n c ep t kn o w a bility ’ ’ fo r on e g rou p of sub jec ts c o va rie d w ith th e c o gn itiv e state s o f a no th er gro u p of su b je c ts.
EXPERIMENT 1 T h e first in v estig atio n ex a m in ed ho w re p orts of c o g nitive sta te v a ry w ith re sp ec t to se ve ral o the r im p o rta n t v aria ble s. S u b je c ts a n sw e re d sta nd a rd qu e stio n s fro m w e ll kn o w n su rv ey s re ga rd ing b oth th e m se lve s, a n d so m eo n e else livin g w ith th e m . R e sp on d e n ts g en e ra lly d raw o n d iffe re nt typ e s of k no w led g e a n d b e lie fs w h e n pro v id in g pro x y rep o rts ra th e r th a n se lf-re p orts (B la ir, M e n o n , & B ick a rt, 19 9 3 ; W e lle n s, 1 9 9 2). W e w o u ld ex p ec t tha t resp o n d en ts g en e rally h av e m o re pre c ise k n o w le d ge a b o ut th e ir ow n b e ha v io urs th an th o se o f o th e rs, so pro x y re sp o n ses m ay req u ire d iffe re nt retriev a l p ro ce sse s. E ve n w h e n a p ro xy h as th e ne c essa ry in form atio n a bo u t a n oth er p erso n , it m ay req u ire m o re e ffo rt to a cc e ss th is in fo rm a tio n . F urth e rm o re , w e e x p ec t th at pro x y re sp on d e nts w o uld ne e d to ge n era te re sp o nse s m ore o ften , a n d a lso m ore freq u e ntly b e u n a ble to pro v id e a re a so na b le re spo n se. C o g n itive sta te s sh o u ld a lso va ry w ith e x pe c te d fam ilia rity o f in fo rm a tio n to surv e y re sp on d en ts. F o r e x am ple , e m p lo y m e n t d e ta ils a re g en er ally m o re fa m iliar to p e op le th a n th e ir ex p en d itu re s. A c co rd in g ly , th e d istrib u tio n o f re p o rte d co g n itive state s w a s e xp e c te d to d iffe r as a fu n ctio n o f th e k in d o f in fo rm a tio n , o r kin d o f su rv ey , th at is pre se nte d to resp o nd e n ts. T h u s, su b jec ts w o u ld b e e x pe c ted to en g ag e in m o re d irec t re triev a ls a n d re co n stru c tiv e
``DON’T KNOW’’ RESPONSES IN SURVEYS
417
retrie v als an d le ss g u essin g w h en a n sw e rin g q u estion s ab o ut em p lo y m e n t tha n w he n an sw e rin g qu e stio n s ab o u t e x pe n d itu res . In th is e xp e rim e nt, w e w e re p rim a rily in tere sted in sh o w in g th a t a ctu a l su rv e y q ue stio n s req u ire d su b jec ts to dra w in fo rm atio n fro m the en tire ran g e o f co g n itiv e sta te s, a n d fu rth e rm o re th at su bje cts c ou ld disting u ish w h a t state rep rese n ted th e ir ow n le ve l o f k n o w le d ge . F o r co n sisten c y, w e in stru c te d su bje cts to a n sw er th e q u estion if at a ll p ossib leÐ thu s e nc o u ra g in g su b stan tiv e resp o n ses e v en if su bje c ts m ig h t be in th e ``ig n or an t’ ’ sta te . W e in d ic a te d tha t g ue ssin g w as a cc e pta ble , b ut th a t w e w a nte d to k n o w w h en th e y w e re gu e ssin g, an d w h e th e r the g u e ss h ad a b a sis (an ed u ca ted g u e ss) o r d id n o t h av e a rea so na b le b asis (a w ild g u ess ).
Method Su b jec ts. E ig h t a du lt m ale s a n d six a du lt fe m a le s pa rtic ip a ted in th e ex p e rim en t w ith ou t re im b u rsem en t. A ll su bje c ts w e re em p lo y ed a nd liv ing in a h ou se h old w ith an o the r em p lo y e d in div idu a l. M a teria ls. A 2 0 -qu e stio n in terv iew w as c on stru cte d to a sk su b je c ts a bo u t asp e cts o f th eir re c e nt em p lo y m e n t a nd e xp e nd itu re s. T e n e m p loy m e n t qu e stio n s an d ten ex p en d itu re qu e stio n s w e re e x tra cte d fro m the D e pa rtm e n t o f L ab o r’ s C urre n t P o p ula tio n S u rv e y a n d C o n su m e r E x p en d itu re In terv ie w S u rv ey , resp e ctiv ely , fo r u se in th e ex p erim e n t. T h e C u rre nt P o p u la tio n S u rv ey , w h ic h h elp s d ete rm in e e m p lo ym en t a n d un e m p lo ym en t statistic s, in clu d es qu e stio n s su ch a s ``H o w m a n y h ou rs p er w e e k d o y ou u su ally w ork a t th is jo b ? ’ ’ . T h e C on su m er E xp e nd itu re S u rve y , w h ich h e lp s d e term in e th e C on su m er P ric e Ind e x , in clu de s q u estio ns su c h a s ``S in c e th e first o f Ju ly ha v e yo u p urc h ase d an y c lo thin g , e ith e r fo r m e m b e rs of y o ur h o u seh o ld o r for so m e o n e o u tsid e yo u r h ou se h old ?’ ’ . T h e q u estio n s w e re o rga n ised into tw o se ts, o n e fo r self rep o rtin g an d o ne fo r p rox y rep o rtin g, w ith th e C u rren t P op u la tio n S u rv e y qu e stio n s p re c ed in g th o se from the C on su m er E x p en d iture S u rv e y . P ro c ed u re . E a c h sub jec t c o m p le te d th e inte rv ie w for him se lf o r h erse lf an d the n fo r an o th er em p lo y e d m em be r o f th e h o u seh o ld. Su b jec ts first re sp o nd e d to the q u estio n re ad b y th e in te rv ie w er an d th e n rep o rte d w h ich of fou r an sw e rin g p ro c esse s the y u se d to re trie ve the in form a tio n n e ce ssary for a nsw e ring th e q ue stio n . T he se a n sw e rin g p ro ce sse s w e re d irec t re ca ll, re co n stru ctio n , e d uc a te d g ue ssin g, a n d w ild g ue ssin g, w h ich co rre sp on d a p p ro x im a tely to th e c o gn itiv e states d e scrib ed e arlier. F o r the sub je cts, w e de fine d th e se a s follo w s: 1. D ire c t R e ca ll: Y o u re m e m b er q uic kly (see m in g ly w ith o u t e v en th in kin g ) an d y o u a re c ertain tha t yo u r re sp o nse is co rrec t.
418
BEATTY ET AL.
2 . R e co n struc tio n : It ta ke s so m e tim e for y o u to re m e m b e r. T o g e n era te a re sp o n se, y o u se a rc h y o u r m em o ry a nd pie ce bits o f in fo rm a tio n to ge th er. O n c e y o u rem em be r, y o u are c e rta in th at y o ur resp o n se is c orre ct. 3 . E d u ca ted G u e ss: Y o u h av e som e ge n era l kn o w led g e o r e xp e rien ce o n w h ic h y ou b a se y o ur re sp on se b u t a re n o t c ertain th at y o u r re spo n se is co rre ct. 4 . W ild G u ess: Y o u h a v e n o ba sis fo r y ou r resp o n se a n d a re v e ry u n su re tha t yo u r resp o n se is co rre ct. If su b jec ts re sp o n de d th a t th e y d id no t k no w th e a n sw er to a q u estio n, th e y w e re en c ou ra g ed to p ro v ide a n a nsw e r n ev e rth e le ss, an d to in d ic a te th eir c o gn itiv e sta te.
Results T h e p e rce nta g e o f q u estio n s a nsw ere d w ith a p articu la r p roc e ss w e re c om p u te d fo r ea ch su bje ct. T a b le 1 p rese nts the n u m b e r o f re sp on se s to e ac h q u estio n a s a fu n c tio n o f re sp o nse statu s (se lf o r p rox y ), su rv ey ty pe (e m p lo ym en t o r ex p en d itu re s), a n d an sw er in g p roc e ss (dire ct rec a ll, rec o n stru ctio n , e du c a te d gu e ss, o r w ild g u ess). A n a na ly sis of va rian c e w a s pe rform e d w ith rep e a te d m e a sure s o n all th re e ind e pe n d en t va ria b les. T h is a n aly sis fo u nd a sig n ifica n t m a in e ffec t fo r a n sw e rin g p ro ce ss [F (3 ,3 9 ) = 9 4 .2 3 , P < .0 0 1 ], a nd sig n ifica n t in tera c tio n s b etw ee n a n sw e rin g pro c ess an d su rv ey ty p e [F (3 ,3 9 ) = 30 .1 5 , P < .0 01 ] an d b etw e en an sw e rin g p ro ce ss a n d resp o n se statu s [F (3,3 9) = 5.8 3 , P < .0 5]. S u b jec ts re p orted the use o f d ire ct rec all fo r a m a jo rity o f th e q ue stio ns, re g a rdle ss o f resp o n se sta tu s o r su rv e y ty pe . S u b je c ts re po rte d th e u se of m o re ed u ca ted an d w ild gu e ssin g an d less rec o nstru ction w he n p rox y re p o rtin g tha n w h e n self re p ortin g. T h e su b je c ts re po rted th e use o f m o re re co nstru ctio n , ed u ca ted g u essin g, an d w ild gu e ssin g w he n an sw erin g q u e stio n s a b ou t ev e ryd a y ex p en d itu re s th a n w h e n a n sw erin g q u estio n s ab o ut e m p loy m e n t.
Discussion T h e re sults su g g est th at sub je cts a n sw e re d su rve y q u e stio ns o n th e b a sis o f diffe re n t co g n itive sta te s: th e se sta tes c o va ried w ith th e self/pro x y sta tu s of th e sub je ct an d th e e xp e c te d fa m ilia rity o f th e info rm a tio n . A d m itte d ly , o u r su b jec ts co u ld on ly rep o rt th e ir be lie fs ab o u t th e ir co g nitiv e sta te sÐ re p o rts th at c o uld b e sub je ct to e rro rÐ b u t th ese re po rts v a ry ac ro ss the ra n ge of p o ssible c o gn itiv e sta tes in a v ery rea so n ab le m an n e r. A su b sta n tia l p ro p ortio n o f su b jec ts b a sed m an y of th e ir a n sw ers o n a n ed u ca ted gu e ss o r a w ild g ue ss (ra ng in g from 5 .7 % to 4 9 .7 % fo r a to ta l o f bo th kin d s o f g u esse s a n d b oth k in ds o f surv e y s). A lso as ex p e cted , su b je c ts rep o rtin g as p ro xie s fo r a n oth e r pe rso n m a nifeste d a g rea te r g u e ssin g rate (18 .5 % fo r th e
TABLE 1 Proportion of Respondents Reporting Cognitive Strategies Used to Answer Survey Questions Drawn from the Current Population Survey and the Consumer Expenditure Survey SELF
PROXY
M em ory
G u e ss i n g
M e m o ry
D
R
E
W
D
R
G u e s s in g E
W
100
0
0
0
10 0
0
0
0
93
7
0
0
10 0
0
0
0
3 . F o r w h o m d o e s (n a m e ) w o rk ?
100
0
0
0
86
14
0
0
4 . O n th is jo b , i s (n a m e ) c o v e re d
100
0
0
0
71
7
7
14
21
50
29
0
14
21
36
29
35
86
7
7
0
100
0
0
64
29
7
0
64
29
7
0
50
36
14
0
14
7
71
7
100
0
0
0
79
14
7
0
93
7
0
0
79
14
7
0
5 .7
0
7 0 .7
1 0 .6
C u rr e n t P o p u la ti o n S u r ve y 1 . D id (n a m e ) d o a n y w o rk a t al l la s t w e e k , n o t c o u n tin g w o rk a ro u n d th e h o u s e ? 2 . D o e s ( n a m e) o p e ra t e (h is /h e r) o w n b u s in e ss o r fa rm ?
b y a u n io n o r e m p l o y e e a ss o c ia ti o n c o n tra c t? 5 . H o w m u ch d o e s (n a m e) u s u a lly e ar n p er w e e k a t th is jo b b e fo r e d e d u c tio n s? In c l u d e an y o v e rtim e p ay , c o m m is s io n s, o r ti p s u su a ll y re c ei v e d . 6 . D o e s (n a m e ) u s u a l ly w o rk . . . h o u rs o r m o re a w e e k a t th is jo b ? 7 . H o w m a n y h o u rs p e r w e ek d o e s (n a m e) u s u a l ly w o rk at th is jo b ? 8 . H o w m a n y h o u rs d id (n a m e ) w o rk la s t w e e k a t t h i s jo b ? 9 . D id ( n a m e) l o s e a n y ti m e o r ta k e a n y t im e o ff l a st w e ek fo r a n y re a s o n s u c h a s il ln e ss , h o li d a y , o r sl a ck w o rk ? 1 0 . D id ( n a m e) w o rk a n y o v e rti m e o r a t m o re t h a n o n e jo b l a st w e e k ? O v e ra ll p ro p o rt io n s o f c o g n itiv e
8 0 .7
1 3 .6
1 3 .5
5 .0
s tra te g ie s u s e d O v e ra ll p ro p o rt io n s m em o ry v s .
9 4 .3
5 .7
8 1 .3
1 8 .5
g u e s s in g (C o n tin u ed o v e rle a f)
419
TABLE 1 (Continued) SELF
PR OXY
M em ory
G u es s in g
M e m o ry
D
R
E
W
D
R
G u e s si n g E
W
1 00
0
0
0
79
14
0
7
0
8
46
46
25
0
38
38
71
29
0
0
57
14
14
14
4 . W h a t d id (h e /s h e) b u y ?
43
43
14
0
15
38
23
23
5 . In w h a t m o n th d i d (h e /s h e)
50
36
14
0
23
31
31
15
6 . H o w m u c h d i d i t c o st ?
50
29
14
7
8
8
38
46
7 . S in c e th e fi rs t o f (Ju ly ) h a s
79
14
7
0
50
21
14
14
33
17
33
17
0
25
0
75
1 00
0
0
0
93
0
7
0
0
43
50
7
0
0
43
57
2 1 .9
1 7 .8
7 .7
3 5 .0
1 5 .1
2 0 .8
2 8 .9
C u s t o m e r E x p e n d i tu r e S u r v e y 1 . S in c e th e fi rs t o f (Ju ly ) h a s (n a m e) p u rc h a s e d o r re n t e d a n y v i d e o ca s s e tt es , t ap e s , a n d d i sc s fo r y o u r h o u s e h o l d o r a s a g ift to s o m eo n e o u ts id e y o u r h o u s e h o ld ? 2 . W h at w as the cost o r w h at w as th e to ta l re n ta l e x p e n s e s in c e th e 1 s t o f (J u ly ), e x c lu d in g th e c u rre n t m o n th ? 3 . S in c e th e fi rs t o f (Ju ly ), h a s (n a m e) p u rc h a s e d a n y c lo th in g , e it h e r fo r m e m b e rs o f y o u r h o u s e h o ld o r fo r s o m e o n e o u ts id e y o u r h o u se h o ld ?
p u rc h as e (s e le c t o n e ite m fr o m # 4 )
(n a m e) p u rc h a s e d a n y m a g a z in e s n o t in c l u d e d i n a s u b s cri p ti o n ? 8 . W h a t w a s t h e to ta l e x p e n s e fo r t h e m ? 9 . S in c e th e fi rs t o f (Ju ly ) h a s (n a m e) p u rc h a s e d d in n e rs , o t h e r m e a ls o r s n a c k s in re st a u ra n ts , c af et e ria s , c a fe s, d ri v e -i n s , o r o t h e r s u ch p l a ce s ? 1 0 . W h a t w a s t h e u su a l m o n t h l y e x p e n s e fo r t h e s e p u rc h as e s? O v e ra ll p ro p o rti o n s o f c o g n itiv e
5 2 .6
s tra te g ie s u s e d O v e ra ll p ro p o rti o n s m e m o ry v s . g u e s s in g
420
7 4 .5
2 5 .5
4 0 .1
4 9 .7
``DON’T KNOW’’ RESPONSES IN SURVEYS
421
C urre n t P o p u lation S u rv e y qu e stio n s to 4 8 .9 % fo r the C o n sum er E x p en d iture S u rv e y q u estio n s) th an rep o rts a bo u t on e se lf (5.7 % fo r th e C urre n t P o p ula tio n S u rv e y q u e stio n s an d 25 .5 % fo r th e C o n sum e r E x pe n ditu re S u rve y q ue stio n s). In a d ditio n, a hig h er p e rce n ta g e o f an sw ers fo r e x pe n d itu re qu e stio n s inv o lv e d ed u ca ted a nd w ild g ue ssin g (2 5 .5 % fo r self resp o nse s a nd 4 9 .7 % fo r p ro x ies), c o m p a re d to em p lo y m e n t q u estio n s (5 .7 % fo r se lf re sp on se s an d 1 8.5 % fo r pro x ie s), su g g esting th at in d ivid u als a re m o re kn o w led g ea b le a bo u t the ir e m p lo ym en t th a n th eir ex p en d iture s. T h u s, su b jec ts a p pe a r to m ak e use o f a v ariety o f co g n itiv e sta te s w h ile an sw e rin g q u estio ns, an d it ap p ea rs tha t su bje cts are a ble to d istin g uish a m o n g th eir c o gn itive sta te s in a m an n e r tha t reflec ts o ur e xp e cta tio n s o f h ow th ey sh ou ld v a ry w ith re sp ec t to re sp o n se statu s an d info rm a tio n fam iliarity .
EXPERIMENT 2 B ase d o n th e re su lts of the first ex p erim e n t, it see m e d po ssible th a t p e op le c ou ld ind ica te o n a ratin g sc ale th e co g n itiv e state lik ely to b e e lic ite d b y su rv e y q ue stio n s, a nd tha t su c h ra tin g s c o uld pre d ic t an sw ers th a t re sp on d e nts w ou ld g iv e to surv e y q u estio n s. E x p erim en t 2 a ske d o ne gro u p o f su bje cts to ra te th e k no w a b ility of su rv e y q u estio ns, a n d the n u se d the se ra tin g s to p red ict th e resp o n d in g b y a n o the r g ro u p o f su b jec ts (th o se w h o resp o n d ed in E x p erim en t 1 ). B e c au se th e a m ou n t of k no w led g e a p erso n ha s is o ften d ire ctly re late d to the ir in tere st in th e k n o w le d ge , th e d esig n of th e sec o nd e xp e rim e nt in clu d ed a co n d itio n to asse ss w he the r su bje cts w ere ac tu a lly rating th eir kn o w led g e state o r sim p ly th e ir inte re st in a to p ic . A c co rd ing ly , E x p erim en t 2 a lso o b ta in e d rating s of th e im p o rta n c e of th e to pic s a dd re ssed by qu e stio n s, th e reb y p erm ittin g statistic al an a ly sis o f w h e the r a nsw e rin g stra teg y is b a sed o n k no w a b ility reg a rd le ss o f im p o rtan c e.
Method Su b jec ts. A to tal o f 76 su b je c ts w e re re cru ite d at G eo rg e W ash in gto n U niv er sity , G e o rge M a son U n iv ersity, a nd U n ion S ta tio n to p artic ipa te in th is p art of the stud y . P a rtic ip a n ts w e re p aid $ 10 fo r th eir tim e (fo ur su b je c ts w h o ca m e to the C o lle c tio n P ro ce d u res R ese ar ch L a b a t th e B u re au o f L ab o r S ta tistic s w e re p aid $ 1 5 fo r tim e a n d trav e l) a nd sign e d fo rm s, b efo re p artic ipa ting , a ssu rin g th em th a t a ll in fo rm a tio n c o lle cte d w o u ld b e he ld in stric t co n fid e n ce in ac co rd an c e w ith th e B u re au o f L a b or S tatistic s’ co n fid e n tia lity p olicie s. M a teria ls a n d P ro c ed u re . A ll su bje cts w e re g iv e n tw o q ue stion n aire s, on e for se lf a n d o n e fo r p ro x y re sp on se , c o nta in in g 1 0 qu e stio n s ex trac ted from th e C E a n d te n q ue stion s e x tra cte d fro m the C P S . S u b jec ts w e re ask e d to p e rfo rm o ne o f tw o ta sk s; 4 0 su bje c ts w e re a sk ed to e stim a te ho w like ly it is th a t p e op le
422
BEATTY ET AL.
kn o w ce rta in k ind s o f in fo rm a tion ab o u t the m selv es a nd the ir sp o use s, a n d 3 6 sub je cts w e re ask e d to estim a te h o w im po rta n t it is th at pe o ple k n ow ce rtain kin d s of in fo rm atio n a b ou t the m se lv es a n d th eir sp ou se s. S u b jec ts a n sw ere d th e self q ue stio nn a ire first a n d th e n th e p ro x y q ue stion n a ire . S u b je c ts pro v id e d the ir an sw e rs in th e fo rm o f a n u m b e r u sin g a 5 -po in t L ik er t sca le, w ith 1 b e in g e ith e r ``n o t at a ll lik ely ’ ’ o r ``n o t a t a ll im p o rtan t’ ’ , to 5 b e in g eithe r ``e x tre m ely lik ely ’ ’ or ``ex trem e ly im p o rta nt’ ’ .
Results T h e m e an rating s o f the lik e lih o o d o f k no w in g re q ue sted in fo rm a tion fo r se lf an d pro x y are sho w n in T a b le 2 . T h e k no w a b ility ratin gs a n d im p o rtan c e ra tin g s w e re c orre lated w ith th e p ro p ortio n of an sw e rs b ase d o n d ire ct re c all o r re c o nstru ctio n (``m e m o ry re sp on se s’ ’ ), a s op p o sed to ed u ca te d o r w ild g ue sse s fo r b o th se lf re p orts an d p ro xy re po rts (ba se d on T a b le 1 ). K n o w ab ility co rre la te d .7 3 0 w ith se lf-re p orte d m em o ry resp o nse s to the tw o su rv e ys; th e TABLE 2 Mean Ratings of Knowability and Likeability of Knowledge Needed to Answer the Questions in Table 1 K n o w a b i lity
L ik e a b i lity
S el f
P ro xy
Self
P r o xy
1
4 .6 3
3 .9 8
4 .1 4
3 .8 3
2
4 .6 8
4 .7 0
4 .0 6
4 .1 7
3
4 .6 0
4 .4 5
4 .4 7
4 .4 7
4
3 .7 3
3 .8 0
4 .4 4
4 .4 7
5
3 .6 8
3 .7 0
4 .6 4
4 .3 1
6
4 .6 5
4 .1 3
4 .2 2
4 .0 3
7
4 .3 8
4 .1 3
4 .1 9
4 .1 1
8
4 .1 0
3 .4 8
3 .8 1
3 .7 5
9
4 .3 3
4 .2 0
4 .0 3
3 .8 9
10
4 .4 5
4 .0 8
4 .1 4
3 .9 4
1
4 .2 0
3 .4 0
2 .7 2
2 .5 0
2
2 .6 8
2 .2 5
2 .5 3
2 .5 6
3
3 .8 5
3 .2 5
3 .1 4
2 .8 3
4
3 .2 8
2 .7 0
2 .6 7
2 .4 2
5
2 .5 5
2 .0 8
2 .1 1
1 .9 4
6
2 .9 8
2 .1 3
3 .3 1
2 .9 4
7
3 .5 5
2 .5 0
2 .3 1
1 .8 9
8
2 .0 8
1 .9 0
2 .2 8
2 .1 9
9
3 .7 0
2 .9 5
2 .7 8
2 .7 2
10
2 .4 0
2 .0 8
3 .3 1
3 .1 7
CPS
CE
``DON’T KNOW’’ RESPONSES IN SURVEYS
423
sam e c orre lation w ith p ro xy rep o rts w as .7 5 5 . In co n trast, im p o rta n ce ra tin g s co rrela ted .3 7 1 w ith se lf-re po rte d m e m o ry resp o n ses to th e tw o su rve y s; th e sam e c orre lation w ith p rox y rep o rts w as .3 7 3 . H o w e ve r, w h en im po rta nc e is p artia lled o ut o f co rrela tio n s o f kn o w ab ility rating s, th e pa rtia l co rrela tio n s rem ain esse n tia lly u nc h an g ed (.7 0 9 for self rep o rts; 8 7 7 fo r p ro x y re po rts) an d w he n kn o w ab ility is p artialled o u t o f c o rre lation s o f im po rtan c e ra tin gs, th e p artia l c orre lation co e fficie n ts rev e rse sig n su b sta n tia lly (± .2 8 9 fo r self re p orts; ± .7 33 fo r p rox y re p o rts). T hu s, k n o w ab ility u n d erlie s im p orta nc e ra tin g s b u t im p orta nc e d oe s n o t un d er lie kn o w ab ility ratin gs. E x a m in atio n of th e p ro x y an d self d ata in d ica ted tha t th e kn o w ab ility rating s w e re c o rre late d m o st stro ng ly w ith th e ed u ca te d g u esse s o f se lve s a nd w ith the w ild g ue sse s o f p rox ies. T h is p attern w as n o t e vid e nt in th e se lf im p o rtan ce rating s b u t w a s ev ide n t in th e p ro x y im p o rta nc e ra tin g s.
DISCUSSION T h e resu lts su p po rte d th e g en e ral h y po th ese s ab o u t k n o w a b ility a n d im po rtan c e. T h e pro b a bility o f g u e ssin g w as re late d to b oth k no w a bility a nd im p o rta n c e, b u t m o re stro n gly to k n o w ab ility . F in a lly , th e se tw o m ea su res o f q u estio n to pic rev e al th a t k n ow a b ility a nd im p o rta nc e v a ry a cro ss differ en t top ic s, su gg e stin g tha t m o re rese a rc h sho u ld e x am ine th e d iffere n ce s in the pro c ess o f qu e stio n an sw e rin g elicite d b y differe nt q u estio nn a ire s.
Cross Experiment Comparisons T h e re su lts o f E x p erim e nts 1 a nd 2 su pp o rt the assu m p tio ns o f the R e spo n se B asis F ra m e w o rk as th e y p e rta in to co g nitiv e sta tes. S u b je cts w ere a ble to d isting u ish at le a st fo ur c o gn itiv e sta tes th at c orre spo n d to the fram ew o rk an d are relate d to resp o n din g . S p e cific ally , th e re sea rch ex a m in e d h o w sub je cts’ co g n itiv e states rela ted to oth er su bje cts’ pe rce iv ed lik elih oo d th at: (1 ) th e to pic o f a q u estio n w o u ld b e kn o w n to a pe rso n (i.e . k n o w ab ility); a n d (2 ) tha t th e top ic w o uld b e reg a rde d a s im p orta n t to a p erso n . E x p erim e n t 1 su p po rted th is tax o no m y of c o g nitive sta te s. In E xp e rim e nt 2 , it w as hy p o the sised th at a s k no w a b ility in c rea se d, an sw erin g b a sed o n inf orm ation in m e m o ry w ou ld inc rea se an d w ild gu e ssin g w o uld de c rea se . A s ex p ec ted , th e resu lts sho w e d th at in cre as es in qu e stio n -top ic kn o w ab ility an d im p o rta n c e w e re c o rre late d w ith a d e cre ase in gu e ssing a n d an in cre ase d p re v ale n ce o f m e m o ry re sp o nse s. F u rth e rm o re, th e p artia l co rrela tio n c o efficie nts sh o w ed th a t th e re spo n se stra te g y d e pe n d ed o n k n o w a b ility a n d n o t o n im p o rt a n c e . W h e n th e i n flu e n c e o f im p o rta n c e w a s r e m o v e d fr o m th e co rrela tio n s b etw ee n k no w a b ility an d lik e lih o o d o f m e m o ry resp o n ses, th e p artia ls w ere esse n tia lly the sa m e as th e first-o rd e r c o rrela tio ns. A lte rna tiv e ly , w he n th e in flu e nc e o f kn o w ab ility w a s pa rtia lle d o u t o f th e c orre la tio n s b etw ee n im p orta nc e a n d lik e lih o o d o f m e m ory use , th e lik elih o od of d ire ct re trie v al an d
424
BEATTY ET AL.
ed u ca ted g ue ss shifted fro m b e in g p o sitiv e to n eg a tiv e . A sim ila r p a tte rn o f re su lts w a s fou n d fo r p rox y re spo n ses a s fo r se lf re sp o nse s (sho w n in T ab le 1), altho u g h th e p ro xy re sp o nse s rev e a le d a g re a te r inc lina tio n to w ild g u essin g (b a se d o n a lac k o f kn o w a bility ). T hu s, k n ow a b ility ra tin g s a c tu a lly re flec t lik ely de g ree o f k n o w led g e, ra th er th an the rate r’ s asse ssm e n t o f the q u estio n top ic ’ s im po rta nc e .
Conclusions T h e pre sen t fram e w o rk also assu m es th at jud g e m e n ts o f the ad e q ua c y o f a re sp o n se a n d th e c o m m itm en t to c o -o p e ra te w ith surv e y re se arc he rs are a s im po rta nt to pre d ic ting a resp o nse as are th e c o gn itiv e state s. A lth o ug h th is artic le re v ie w s ev id en c e su pp o rtin g the role o f ad e qu a c y ju d ge m e n ts a n d co m m u n ic a tiv e in ten t, fu tu re rese arc h w ill b e n ec e ssary to e v alu ate a ssum ptio n s ab o ut th ese tw o fa cto rs o f the fram ew o rk . T h e fram ew o rk a n d the sup p o rtin g re sea rch ha v e im p lic a tio ns fo r re spo n se ru le s fo r su rv e ys. S u b je c ts in this rese arc h w e re told th at an y re sp o nse w ou ld be ad e qu a te, im p ly in g th a t D K re sp o nse s sho u ld b e a vo id ed . T he y also re p o rte d th a t th e ir resp o n se s to so m e o f th e surv e y qu e stio n s w ere ba se d on a w i ld g u e ss a t b e st. In a c tu a l su rv ey s ettin g s, in te rv ie w e rs m a y in fa c t disc o ura g e D K resp o n ses (see , for e x am p le, G illjam & G ran b erg , 1 9 93 ); re su ltin g in sub sta ntiv e re sp o nse s b a sed on e x tre m e ly sca n t in fo rm a tio n . T h is re se a rc h su g ge sts th at if re sp on d en ts b e lie v e th a t w ild g ue sse s a re ad e qu a te, th e y m ay p ro vid e th em as su b stan tiv e re sp o n ses. R e sea rch e rs sho u ld se riou sly co n sid er w he th er it is w o rth w hile to a llo w su c h re sp o n ses, o r w h eth er it w o u ld b e p refe rab le to e xp lic itly en c ou rag e D K s rath er th a n w ild g ue ssing . F u rth e rm o re , a lth o u g h w e d id n o t e x p lo re th is sc e n a rio in t h e p re se n t ex p erim en ts, resp o n de n ts m a y a lso p rov id e D K s w he n sub sta n tiv e re spo n ses are pre fe ra b le to re se arc he rs, e ith er b e ca u se th ey b eliev e tha t th e ir c o gn itiv e sta te is in su ffic ie n t to ju stify a n sw erin g, o r tha t th e y lac k m o tiv a tio n to pro v id e a re sp on se . A ltho u g h m ore re sea rc h is cle arly n e ce ssary , the e x pe rim e n ts th a t w e h av e co n du c ted th us fa r su g g est th a t u n d ersta nd in g c o gn itiv e sta tes is use fu l fo r un d er sta n din g w h eth er re sp o n de n ts pro v ide su b stan tive resp o n se s b ase d o n m e m o ry , g u esse s, or w ith no rea l b asis fo r resp o nd in g . S u rv ey re se a rch er s ca n m a k e n u m e ro us de sign d e cisio ns th a t c a n in flue n ce th e ty pe o f re spo n ses pro v id ed , in c lud ing the u se o f filte rs, p rob e s, sp ec ify in g the ac ce p tab ility o f gu e sse s, a n d d e sign in g q u e stio n na ires th at m in im ise the b urd e n to m ain tain re sp o n de n t m o tiv ation . T he se d ec ision s ca n b e g u id e d b y a th eo ry a c co u n tin g fo r th e ro le o f c o gn itiv e state s, ad e qu a cy ju d g em en ts, an d c o m m un ica tive in ten t in d ete rm in in g re sp o n se o u tc o m e s, a nd the tra d e-o ffs in v o lv e d w ith v a rio u s erro r co n trol stra teg ie s. W ith c on tinu e d v a lid a tio n , the fram ew o rk m ay fill the n ee d fo r stron g e r th eo ry in th is a rea .
``DON’T KNOW’’ RESPONSES IN SURVEYS
425
REFERENCES B e a tty , P ., & H e rrm a n n , D . (1 9 9 5 ). A fr am e w o rk fo r e v a lu a tin g d o n ’ t k n o w re s p o n se s in su rv ey s . P r o c e e d in g s o f th e S e c ti o n o n S u r v e y R e s e a r c h M e th o d s . A le x a n d ria , V A : A m e ri c an S ta ti st ic a l A ss o c ia ti o n . B is h o p , G .F ., T u c h fa rb er , A .J ., & O ld en d ic k , R .W . (1 9 8 6 ). O p in io n s o n fic ti tio u s i ss u e s : T h e p re s s u r e to a n s w e r s u rv e y q u e s t io n s . P u b l ic O p i n i o n Q u a r te r ly , 5 0 , 2 4 0 ±2 5 0 . B la i r, J ., M e n o n , G ., & B ic k a rt, B . (1 9 9 3 ). M e a s u re m e n t e ffe c ts i n se l f v s p ro x y re s p o n s e s to su rv e y q u e st io n s : A n i n fo rm a ti o n p ro c e s s in g p e rs p e c tiv e . I n N . S c h w a rz & S . S u d m a n (E d s.), A u to b i o g ra p h ic a l m e m o r y a n d t h e v a li d i ty o f r e tr o s p e c ti v e r e p o r ts . N e w
Y o rk : S p r in g e r
V erl a g . B ra d b u rn , N .M ., R i p s , L .J ., & S h e v e l l, S .K . (1 9 8 7 ). A n s w e rin g a u to b i o g ra p h ic al q u e s ti o n s : T h e im p ac t o f m e m o ry a n d in fe re n c e o n s u rv e y s. S c ie n c e, 2 3 9 , 1 5 7 ±1 6 1 . C a n n e ll , C .F ., M il le r, P .V ., & O k s e n b e rg , L . (1 9 8 1 ). R e s ea rc h o n i n t e rv i ew in g te c h n iq u e s . In S . L e in h ard t (E d .), S o c io lo g ic a l m e th o d o lo g y. S a n F ra n c i sc o : J o s s e y - B a ss . C a n n e ll , C .F ., O k se n b erg , L ., & C o n v e rse , J .M . (1 9 7 9 ). E xp e r im e n t s in i n t e rv i ew in g t e ch n iq u e s . A n n A rb o r, M I: In s t itu te fo r S o c i a l R e s ea rc h , T h e U n iv e rs ity o f M ic h ig a n . C a n n e l, C .R ., & H e n so n , R . (1 9 7 4 ). I n c e n t iv e s, m o t iv e s, a n d re sp o n s e b ia s . P r o c ee d in g s o f th e S e c ti o n o n S u r v e y M e th o d s R e s e a rc h (p p .4 2 5 ±4 3 0 ). A le x a n d ria , V A : A m e ric a n S ta ti st ic a l A ss o c ia ti o n . D e M a io , T .J . (1 9 8 4 ). S o c ia l d e s ira b il ity a n d s u rv e y m e a s u re m e n t : A rev ie w . In C . T u rn e r & E . M a rti n (E d s .), S u r ve y in g s u b je c t iv e p h e n o m e n a (V o l. 2 , p p .2 5 7 ±2 8 2 ). N e w Y o rk : R u s s e ll S a g e . E i se n h o w e r, D ., M a th io w e t z, N .A ., & M o rg a n s te in , D . (1 9 9 1 ). R e c a ll e rro r: S o u rc e s a n d b ia s re d u c tio n te c h n iq u e s . In P . B i e m er , R .M . G ro v e s , L . L y b e rg , N .A . M a th io w e t z a n d S . S u d m a n (E d s .), M e a s u re m e n t e r r o rs in s u r v e y s. N ew Y o rk : W il e y . G fro e re r, J ., G u s t in , J ., & T u rn e r, C .F . (1 9 9 2 ). In t ro d u ct io n . In C .F . T u rn e r, J .T . L e ss l er & J .C . G fro e re r (E d s.), S u r v e y m e a s u re m e n t o f d r u g u se : M et h o d o l o g ic a l s tu d i es . R o c k v il le , M D : U S D ep a rtm e n t o f H e a lt h & H u m a n S e rv i c e s. G illja m , M ., & G ra n b e rg , D . (1 9 9 3 ). S h o u ld w e t ak e d o n ’ t k n o w fo r a n an s w e r? P u b l ic O p in io n Q u a r te r ly, 5 7 , 3 4 8 ±3 5 7 . G ro v e s , R .M . (1 9 8 9 ). S u rv e y e r ro r s a n d s u r v e y c o s ts . N e w Y o rk : W ile y . H a sh e r, L ., & G riffi n , M . (1 9 7 8 ). R e c o n s t ru c tiv e a n d re p ro d u ct iv e p ro c e s s e s in m e m o ry . J o u r n a l o f E x p er i m e n ta l P s y c h o lo g y : H u m a n L e a r n in g a n d M e m o ry , 4 , 3 1 8 ±3 3 0 . H e rrm a n n , D .J . (1 9 8 6 ). R e m e m b e rin g p a s t e x p e rie n c e s : T h e o re ti ca l p e rs p e c ti v e s p a s t a n d p re s e n t. In T . S h le c te r & M . T o g l ia (E d s .), N e w d ir e c tio n s in c o g n itiv e s c ie n c e . N o rw o o d , N J: A b le x . H e rrm a n n , D .J . (1 9 9 3 ). T h e v a lid it y o f re tro s p e c tiv e re p o rts a s a fu n c t io n o f t h e d ire c t n e s s o f re trie v a l p ro c e s s e s. In N . S c h w a rz & S . S u d m a n ( E d s.), A u to b io g r a p h i c a l m e m o r y a n d th e v a l id i ty o f r et r o s p ec ti ve r e p o r ts . N e w Y o rk : S p rin g e r V e rla g . H e rrm a n n , D .J. (1 9 9 5 ). R e p o rtin g c u rre n t, p a st , a n d c h a n g e d h e al th s ta t e s: W h a t w e k n o w a b o u t d i st o rt io n . M e d ic a l C a r e , 3 3 , A S 8 9 ±A S 9 4 . H ip p l er , H .J ., & S c h w a rz , N . (1 9 8 9 ). N o o p in io n fi lte rs : A c o g n it iv e p e rs p ec t iv e. In t er n a tio n a l J o u r n a l o f P u b l ic O p i n i o n R e s e a r c h , 1 , 7 7 ±8 7 . H ip p l er , H .J ., S c h w a rz , N ., & S u d m an , S . (E d s .). (1 9 8 7 ). S o ci a l in fo r m a t io n p ro c e s si n g a n d s u rv e y m et h o d o l o g y . N e w Y o r k : S p ri n g e r V e rl a g . J o b e , J.B ., & H err m a n n , D .J . (1 9 9 6 ). M o d el s o f s u rv e y c o g n it io n fo r m e m o ry t h e o ry . In D .J . H err m an n , C . M c E v o y , C . H e rtz o g , P . H e rt e l & M . J o h n s o n (E d s.), B a s ic a n d a p p l ie d m e m o r y re s e a rc h : P r a c t ic a l a p p l ic a t io n s , V o l. 2 . H illsd a le , N J : L a w re n c e E rlb au m A s s o c ia te s In c . K ro s n ic k , J .A . (1 9 9 1 ). R e sp o n s e st ra te g i e s f o r c o p i n g w ith th e c o g n itiv e d e m a n d s o f a ttitu d e m e as u re s in s u rv e y s . A p p l ie d c o g n it iv e p s yc h o lo g y , 5 , 2 1 3 ±2 3 6 . M a rt in , E . (1 9 8 6 ). R e p o rt o n t h e d e v e lo p m en t o f a lt e rn a t iv e s c re e n i n g p ro c e d u re s fo r t h e n a ti o n a l c rim e su rv e y . W a sh in g to n , D C : B u re a u o f S o c ia l S c i en c e R e se a rc h .
426
BEATTY ET AL.
M u llin , P .A ., C o n ra d , F .G ., S a n d e r, J .E ., & H e rrm a n n , D . (1 9 9 4 ). A c o g n itiv e th e o r y o f re s p o n d e n t b e h av io r in th e su rv e y in te rv ie w . In D . H e rrm a n n (C h a ir), C o n tr ib u ti o n s o f c o g n i tiv e a n d s o c ia l p s y c h o lo g y to s u r v e y re s e a rc h . S y m p o s iu m
c o n d u cte d
a t th e m e e tin g o f th e A m e ri c an
P s y c h o l o g ic al S o c ie ty , W a s h in g to n , D C . R e d e r, L .M . (1 9 8 7 a). B e y o n d a s s o c ia t io n s : S tr at e g i c c o m p o n e n t s i n m e m o r y re trie v a l. In D . G o rfe in & R . H o ffm a n ( E d s.), M e m o r y a n d le a r n in g : T h e E b b in g h a u s C e n t en n ia l C o n fe re n c e. H i llsd a le , N J : L a w re n c e E rl b a u m A ss o c ia te s I n c . R e d e r, L .M . (1 9 8 7 b ). S tra te g y s e le c ti o n in q u e s ti o n a n s w e rin g . C o g n it iv e P s y ch o lo g y , 1 9 , 9 0 ±1 3 8 . R e d e r, L .M . (1 9 8 8 ). S tr at e g i c c o n tro l o f re tri e v a l s tra te g ie s . T h e P s y ch o lo g y o f L e a r n in g a n d M o tiv a ti o n , 2 2 , 2 2 7 ±2 5 9 . S c h l e n k e r, B .R . (1 9 8 6 ). S e l f-id en tifi c at io n : T o w a rd a n i n t eg ra ti o n o f th e p riv a te a n d p u b li c s e lf. In R . B a u m ei s te r (E d .), P u b lic s e lf a n d p r iv a t e s e lf. N e w Y o rk : S p rin g e r V e rla g . S c h u m a n , H ., & P re ss e r, S . (1 9 8 1 ). Q u e s ti o n s a n d a n s w e r s in a ttitu d e s u rv e y s : E xp e r im e n ts o n q u e st io n fo r m , w o r d in g , a n d c o n t e x t. N e w Y o rk : A ca d e m ic P re s s . S u ch m a n , L ., & J o rd a n , B . (1 9 9 0 ). In te ra c tio n al tro u b l es i n fa c e -to -fa ce su rv ey i n t er v ie w s . J o u rn a l o f th e A m er i ca n S ta ti st ic a l A s so c ia ti o n , 8 5 , 2 3 2 ±2 4 1 , 2 5 2 ±2 5 3 . T o u ra n g e a u , R . (1 9 8 4 ). C o g n itiv e s ci e n c e a n d s u rv e y m e th o d s . In T .B . J a b in e , M .L . S t ra f, J .M . T a n u r & R . T o u ra n g e a u ( E d s.), C o g n it iv e a sp e c ts o f s u rv e y m e th o d o lo g y : B u il d i n g a b ri d g e b e tw e e n d i sc i p l in e s . W as h in g t o n D C : N at io n a l A c a d em y P re s s . T o u ra n g e a u , R ., & R a s in sk i, K .A . (1 9 8 8 ). C o g n i tiv e p r o c e s se s u n d e rly in g c o n t e x t e ffe ct s in a ttitu d e m e a s u re m e n t . P sy c h o l o g i c a l B u lle t in , 1 0 3 , 2 9 9 ±3 1 4 . T u rn e r, A .G . (1 9 8 2 ). W h at su b je c ts o f su rv e y re s e a rc h b e lie v e a b o u t c o n fid en ti a li ty . In J .E . S i eb e r ( E d .), T h e e th ic s o f so c ia l r es e a r ch : S u r v e y s a n d E x p e ri m en ts . N e w Y o rk : S p rin g er V e rla g . W e ll e n s , T . (1 9 9 2 ) . D iv e r g i n g p e r sp e c tiv e s o f a c t o r s a n d o b s e r ve r s: A c o g n it iv e p r o c e s sin g a p p r o a c h to s e lf a n d p r o x y r e sp o n d in g . S e m in a r p re s e n te d at th e W as h in g t o n D C S ta ti st ic a l S o c i e ty , W a s h i n g to n , D C , J u n e. W il lis, G ., S i rk e n , M ., & N a th a n , G . (1 9 9 4 ). T h e c o g n itiv e a s p e ct s o f re s p o n se s t o se n s itiv e s u rv e y q u e st io n s . C o g n i tiv e m e th o d s s ta ff w o r k in g p a p e r N o . 9 . H y a tt s v i lle , M D : N a ti o n a l C e n te r fo r H e a lt h S t a tist ic s . W il lis, G .B ., R o y st o n , P .N ., & B e rc i n i, D . (1 9 9 1 ). T h e u s e o f v e rb a l re p o rt m e th o d s in th e a p p lie d c o g n i tiv e l a b o ra to ry . A p p li ed C o g n itiv e P s yc h o lo g y, 5 , 2 5 1 ±2 6 7 .
M E M O R Y , 1 9 9 8 , 6 (4 ), 4 2 7 ±4 5 4
C o lle c tiv e M e m o r ie s o f G e r m a n s a n d J a p a n e se A b o u t th e P a st H a lf-c e n tu r y H o w a rd S c h u m a n a n d H iro k o A k iy a m a U n ive rsity o f M ic h ig a n , U S A
B aÈ rb e l K n aÈ u p e r F re ie U n iv e rsitaÈ t B e rlin , G e rm a n y
W e inv e st ig a te the c o lle c tive m em or ie s of tw o sa m p le s d ra w n in 1 9 91 , o n e f ro m th e fo rm e r W es t G e rm an y a n d o n e fro m Y o ko h am a, Ja pa n . In the e ar ly 1 9 9 0 s su ch s am ples in c lu d e d m a n y m e m b e rs o f W or ld W a r II co h or ts an d a lso c oh o rts b o r n l o n g a f te r th a t w a r h a d e n d e d . W e c o n si d e r th e r e la tio n o f a g e , co n c ep tu a lise d a s b irth c o h o r t, to the s alie n ce o f m e m o ries of n a tion a l a n d w or ld ev e n ts th a t w e r e m en tio n ed a s im p o rta nt in re sp o ns e to a q u ite g en e ra l op e n en d e d q u e st io n a bo u t th e p as t ha lf- ce n tu ry . T he re la tio ns a re sim ilar a c ro ss th e tw o c o un trie s in so fa r as ex ter na l e ve n ts lik e W or ld W a r II m ig h t ha v e h ad si m ila r im p a cts o n ea c h p o pu la tio n , w h ile e a ch co u ntry is d is tinc tiv e w ith r e ga rd to ev e nts th at es p e c ia lly im p ing e d u p o n it. H yp o th e se s a b ou t th e im po r ta n ce o f ad o le sc e n ce an d ea rly a d ulth o od to th e im p rin tin g o f m e m o rie s ar e g e ne ra lly co n fir m e d , b u t s e v e ra l ty p e s o f e v id en c e su g ge st th e n e ed to e x te n d th e de lim itin g ag e s to ea r lier th a n the m id - te e ns a n d la ter th an th e m id- tw e n ties . O th er e v id e n c e in dic ate s th e d e si ra bility o f dist in g u ish in g b e tw e e n re c en t e v e nts th a t ar e th e fo c u s o f m e d ia atte n tio n a n d ea rlie r e v en ts th at de p e nd m or e f ully on au to b io g ra p hica l m e m o ry .
R e q u e s ts fo r re p rin ts sh o u l d b e s e n t to H o w a rd S c h u m a n , 2 5 5 P o p h a m R o a d , P h ip p s b u rg , M a in e 0 4 5 6 2 , U S A . E m ai l: h s c h u m a n @ u m ic h .e d u T h e n a m e s o f t h e c o -a u th o rs , H i ro k o A k iy a m a a n d B aÈ rb e l K n aÈ u p e r, a re l is te d a lp h a b e ti c al ly ; t h e y c o n tri b u te d e q u a lly an d im p o r ta n t ly to t h is p a p e r. O u r re se a rc h a ls o d re w o n t h e a d v ic e , co o p e ra ti o n , a n d g o o d w i ll o f a n u m b e r o f p e o p l e in G e rm a n y , J a p a n , a n d t h e U n ite d S t a te s , fo r w h i c h w e a re e x t re m el y g ra te fu l. In G e rm an y , o u r q u e s tio n s w e re a d d e d to a s u rv e y h e a d e d b y P ro fe s so r W e rn e r W e i d e n fe ld a n d m o re d i re ct ly s u p e rv is e d b y F e li x L u tz ; o u r o w n p a rti c ip a tio n w a s a rra n g e d b y H an s J uÈ rg e n H ip p l er a n d N o rb e rt S c h w a rz . In J a p a n th e s u rv e y w a s h e a d e d b y P ro fe s s o r H iro s h i A z u m a a n d m o re d ire c tly su p er v i se d b y K e ik o T a k a h a sh i, w it h o u r o w n p a rti ci p a tio n fac i lita te d b y T o n i A n t o n u c c i a n d H iro k o A k iy a m a. T h e t ran s la ti o n o f o p en -e n d e d re s p o n s e s fro m J ap a n es e w a s d o n e b y D a v i d C ry s ta l an d N ao k o M o ri y o s h i; th e G e rm an tra n sl a tio n w a s b y B aÈ rb e l K n aÈ u p e r. F l o ri e n B o u w m e es te r h e lp e d d e v e l o p th e c o d es a n d a s s is te d in o t h e r w a y s w i th t h e J a p a n e s e d a ta . H e lp fu l c o m m e n ts o n a n e a rlie r d ra ft w e re p ro v id e d b y D a v i d G ra ff, H o rst -A lfre d H e in ric h , B a rry S c h w a rtz , a n d a n a n o n y m o u s re fe re e fo r M e m o r y. S u p p o rt fo r th e p re s e n t a n a ly s is c a m e p ri m a ri ly fro m a g ra n t fro m th e N a t io n a l In s ti tu te o f A g i n g (A G 0 8 9 5 1 ), w ith ea rl ie r s u p p o rt fr o m th e N a ti o n a l S c ie n c e F o u n d at io n (S E S -8 4 1 0 0 7 8 ).
Ó
1 9 9 8 P s y ch o lo g y P re s s L td
428
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
I n ad d itio n , w e c o n si d er sp e c ia l typ e s o f m e m or ie s , s u c h a s th e e x te nt to w h ic h G e r m an s m e ntio n th e an n ih ila tio n o f Je w s d u ring W o r ld W a r I I an d Ja p an e se m en tio n the a to m ic b o m b in g o f H iro sh im a . N e ith e r e v e nt ap p ea r s o fte n in c o lle ctiv e m e m o rie s o f th e w a r , b ut ins te a d pe r so na l su ff er in g a s a r es ult of the w a r ’ s im p a c t o n o n e’ s o w n life is e sp e c ia lly pr o m in e nt in th e m em or ie s of W or ld W a r II c o h o rts. T h is find in g p o in ts u p th e d iffe re n ce be tw ee n w h at ob se r ve rs c h a ra c te rise as ` `c olle c tiv e m e m o ry ’ ’ a n d w h at s a m ple s ur ve y s in d ic a te a r e the a c tu a l m e m o ries o f th e g e n e ra l p ub lic .
INTRODUCTION G e rm an y an d Jap a n sh are a u n iq u e histo ry: a llies d u rin g W o rld W ar II, d e spite ra c ia l b e lie fs th a t in e ac h c ase m igh t ha v e e xc lud e d th e o the r; in itial suc c ess o f an ex tra o rd in a ry n atu re in th e e arly m o n th s o f th e w ar, fo llo w ed by to tal d e fea t an d o c cu p a tio n b y th eir e n em ie s; sub se qu e n t c re a tio n o f d e m o c ra tic co n stitu tio na l re gim es, h ea v ily in flu en c ed b y the id eo log ies o f th e se fo rm e r e ne m ie s; an d fin ally, ph o en ix -lik e e m e rg e n ce fro m p o st-w a r sh am b les in to e co n o m ic po w e rho u se s, th ou g h still co n stra ine d p olitica lly an d m ilita rily b y th e ir p rev io us w a r-tim e h isto rie s. T h ere are a lso la rge d iffere n ce s b etw ee n th e tw o co u ntries, no t on ly cu ltu ra lly b u t e ve n in re la tion to W orld W ar II. In p artic ula r, a s B u ru m a (1 9 9 4) e m ph a sises, G e rm a n an d Jap a ne se pe rsp ec tiv e s on W o rld W ar II h av e be e n influ en c ed by tw o v e ry differ en t w ar-tim e e ve n ts w ith lo ng -la stin g re v e rbe ration s. F or G erm a ns, th e de lib e ra te a n d sy stem a tic a n n ih ilation o f Jew s in larg e p a rts o f E u rop e cre ate d a ``c o lle ctive m e m o ry ’ ’ o f ha v ing b ee n v ic tim i se r s th a t is d if fic u lt to o v e rc o m e a n d w h ic h le a d s to re p e a t e d ad m on ish m e n t to d o ``th e lab o u r o f m o u rn in g ’ ’ (``T ra ue ra rb eit’ ’ , M itsc he rlic h & M itsc h e rlic h , 1 9 7 5 ). F o r Ja p a n e se , o n th e o th e r h a n d , th e d om in a n t co lle c tiv e m em ory is o ften sa id to b e o f th e m se lv e s as v ic tim s of th e first u se of th e ato m ic b o m b : ``T o th e m ajo rity o f Ja p an e se, H iro sh im a is the su p re m e sym b o l o f th e P a cific W a r’ ’ (B u rum a, 1 99 4 , p .9 2 ). O n e c on trast tha t B u ru m a co n sid ers b u t ap p ea rs to re je ct is th at o f e n du rin g differe n ce s in n ation a l ch a rac ter, fo r ex a m p le , B en ed ic t’ s (1 9 46 ) d istin ctio n b e tw e en ``g u ilt’ ’ a n d ``s ha m e ’ ’ c u ltu resÐ the fo rm e r ap p lyin g m ore to G e rm a n y a nd the la tte r to Jap a n , so th at pu b lic co n fessio n w o u ld b e e nc o ur ag e d b y G e rm a n s b u t av o ide d by Ja pa n e se. B o th th e sim ila rities a n d th e d iffe ren c e s o f th e tw o p e op le s m a ke a co m pa rison o f th eir salien t m e m o rie s o f c o nsid e rab le inte rest to d a y w h en ea c h po p u lation still in c lu d e s su bsta ntia l p ro p or tio ns th a t ex p e rie nc e d the e v en ts o f W o rld W ar II at d iffe ren t a ge s a n d a lso su b stan tial p rop o rtio n s b orn w e ll afte r th e e nd of th e w ar. A cc o un ts su c h as B u ru m a ’ s (1 9 94 ) d raw m a in ly o n co n ve rsa tio n s w ith po litica l an d inte lle ctu al figu re s, p lu s o bse rv a tio ns b a sed o n film s, b o o ks, a n d o th e r c ultu ral o b jec ts. H o w w e ll th e y reflec t th e co lle c tiv e m e m o ries o f the larg er p u b lic in e ac h co u n try is im p o ssib le to tell. F o r th is pu rp os e, sam p le su rv e y da ta a re e ssen tia l.
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES
429
W e u se th e te rm ``co llec tiv e m e m o rie s’ ’ in the p lu ra l, as d istin ct fro m th e sing u la r form th at d ate s fro m H alb w a ch s (1 9 5 0/1 9 8 0) a nd is c o m m on tod a y in so cial scie nc e w ritin g . T h e p lura l ``m e m ories’ ’ ind ica tes tha t o u r re sea rch elicits the m e m o rie s o f sa m p le s o f in d ivid u als, w h e rea s m o st stu d ies o f co llec tiv e m e m o ry a re c on c ern e d w ith h o w ``o b jec ts’ ’ o f m e m o ry a re rep re sen te d in so m e co llec tiv e fo rm , a s in statu es, la ng u ag e , film s, o r o th e r sy m b o ls (e.g . P e n ne b ak e r & B a na sik , 1 99 7 ; S c hu d so n , 1 99 2 ; S ch w a rtz , 1 9 8 2). A t th e sam e tim e , re te n tio n o f th e w o rd ``c o lle ctiv e’ ’ refle cts o u r co n tinu e d foc u s o n n atio n a l co llec tiv itie s b y th e q u estio ns w e a sk a n d th e th eo re tic al po p u lation w e a tte m p t to rep re sen t for e a ch c ou n try . In th is w ay o u r rese a rc h rem ain s c o nn e c te d to so c ia l scie nc e w riting th at d ea ls w ith ``g ro up , in stitu tio n a l, an d cu ltu ra l re c o lle ction s o f th e p ast. . . .’ ’ (S ch u d son , 19 9 2 , p .3 ; see also S ch w artz , 1 9 82 .)
THEORETICAL ISSUES O ur re sea rch w as in itially g u id e d b y p a st w o rk th at em p h asise d th e sign ifica nc e o f a d ole sce n ce a nd e arly ad u lth o o d a s an im p orta n t lo cu s o f m e m o rie s g en e rally, inc lud in g in d ivid u al m em o rie s o f n ation a l an d w o rld e v en ts. In soc iolo g y th e m a jor im p etu s fo r th is p e rspe ctiv e o n th e life c o urse w as first d ev e lop e d b y K arl M an n h eim (1 9 2 8 /1 9 52 , p .2 9 1 ) w ith reg a rd to ``m o d e s of b e ha v io r, fee ling s, an d tho u g h t’ ’ . A sy stem atic e ffort to tes t M a nn h e im ’ s id e as a s the y m ig ht a pp ly sp ec ific ally to m e m o rie s w as m a d e b y S ch u m a n a n d S co tt (1 98 9 ) u sin g a U S n ation a l sa m p le , an d th ere is a lso ea rlie r rela ted w o rk b y R o b e rts a n d L an g (19 8 5 ). In p sy ch o lo gy th e im p orta nc e o f the se sa m e y ea rs fo r m e m o ry w a s d ev e lo p ed in d ep e nd e n tly b y R u b in, W e tzle r, an d N e be s (1 9 86 ) a n d F itzg e rald (19 8 8 ). W e a tte m p t to re p lic a te the se pa st fin d in g s in G erm a ny a n d Ja pa n , a n d to d o so w ith c on sid era b le p re c isio n at sev e ral p o in ts w ith reg a rd to th e co n ne c tio n o f a sp e cific c oh o rt to a pa rtic u la r ev en t, n o tin g a lso h o w th e critic a l a ge from w hic h a m e m o ry o rig in ates c a n v a ry d ep e n d in g on th e n atu re o f the ev e n t. S ec o nd , w e a ssess th e d e g re e to w h ic h a c o lle ctiv e m e m o ry su ch as th e H olo ca u st or H iros him a th at h as b e en a ttrib ute d to v irtu ally a w h ole so cie ty is ac tua lly sa lie nt in th e m em o rie s re p orte d b y re pre se nta tiv e sa m p les o f th ese sam e so c ieties. T h is w ill also ra ise a rela te d issu e : th e co n ne c tio n b etw ee n ch a rac terisatio n s o f a p a st ev e n t thro u gh m e d ia a c co u n ts, co m m e m o ration s, o r o th e r cu ltu ra l c o nstru c tio n s an d the e xte nt to w hic h o rd in a ry p eo p le ad o p t th e sam e ch ara cte risa tio n . T h ird , w e e x plo re th e fo rce s th a t d isting u ish m em orie s o f e a rlier ev e nts from m e m o ries o f v ery rec en t ev en ts. S p ec ific ally , w e hy p o th e sise th a t m e m orie s o f ea rly n ation a l e ve n ts a re lik e ly to d ep e nd m o re h ea v ily o n pe rso na l e x pe rien c e, w he rea s m e m o ries o f re ce nt n ation a l e ve n ts c an b e d u e la rg e ly to an em ph a sis b y the m ed ia o n w ha t is h a pp e n ing ``n o w ’ ’ . T h is also c o rre sp o nd s ap p rox im a tely to the d iffere n ce b e tw e e n e piso d ic o r au tob io g ra p h ic a l m e m o ry a n d se m a ntic o r fac tua l m e m o ry . P e rson a l e x p erie nc e an d m e d ia e m p h asis a re c ertain ly n o t m u tua lly ex c lu siv eÐ a re c en t e ve n t em ph a sised b y the m ed ia ca n also h av e w id e
430
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
au to bio g ra p h ica l im p a ctÐ b ut w e b eliev e th a t the b ala nc e o f th e tw o fo rc es in 1 cre a tin g m em or ie s is like ly to v ary be tw ee n ea rlie r a n d re c en t ev e nts.
THE DATA FROM JAPAN AND GERMANY T h e G e rm a n an d Jap a ne se surv e y s w e d ra w o n w e re u n de rtak en se p ara te ly a n d th e re w ere en o u g h d iffere nc e s be tw e e n th em to req u ire c au tio n in d irec t co m pa rison . (T h e differe n ce s o c cu rred b e ca u se o u r q u estion s w e re a d d ed to la rge r surv e y s d irec ted by oth ers, a n d h a d to b e ad a p ted to th e e x ig e nc ie s o f th o se surv e ys a n d to the p o p ula tio ns u n d er stu d y.) T h ere fo re, w e re po rt th e in itia l re su lts o f ea ch inv e stig atio n se pa ra te ly in its o w n term s . H o w e ve r, the re a r e fu n d a m e n t a l s im i la r iti e s in b o th t h e o v e ra ll s t ru c t u r e o f th e tw o in v e stig atio n s a nd in th e ir resu lts, so a t p o ints alo n g th e w a y a n d m ore fully after pre sen ting th e fin d in g s fo r ea c h co u ntry , w e d iscu ss b o th sim ila rities a n d diffe re n ce s b etw ee n th e tw o c ou n trie s an d d ra w c on c lu sio n s a b ou t co lle c tiv e m e m o ries m ore g en e ra lly .
The Events Questions B o th su rve y s sta rte d from th e o p en -e nd e d q u estion u se d in 1 9 85 by S c h u m a n an d S co tt (1 9 8 9, p.3 63 ) to stu d y A m erica n m e m o ries o f th e pa st ha lf-c e ntu ry : T h e re h a v e b e e n a lo t o f n a tio n a l a n d w o rld e v e n ts a n d ch a ng e s ov e r th e pa s t 50 y e a rsÐ sa y , f ro m a b o ut 1 9 3 0 r ig ht u p u ntil tod a y. W o u ld y o u m e ntio n o ne o r tw o s u ch e v en ts o r c h a n ge s th a t s e em to y o u to h a v e b e en e sp e c ia lly im p o rtan t. T h e re a r en ’ t a n y righ t o r w ro n g a ns w er s to th e q u es tio n Ð ju st w h a te ve r n a tion a l or w or ld e v e nts o r c h an g es o v e r th e p a st 50 y e a rs th a t c o m e to m in d a s im p o rtan t to y o u .
1
2
H e re w e fo llo w T u l v i n g (1 9 7 2 , 1 9 8 3 ) i n tre a t in g ep is o d i c a n d a u to b io g ra p h ica l m e m o ry a s
e ss e n tia ll y th e sa m e . C o n w a y (1 9 9 0 ) p o in ts o u t th a t fa c tu a l k n o w le d g e a b o u t o n e ’ s s e lf (e .g . k n o w i n g o n e ’ s d a te o f b irth ) c an b e c o n s id e re d a fo rm o f a u to b i o g ra p h ic al m em o ry , b u t fo r t h e p u rp o s e o f th e p re s e n t a rti cl e th e im p o rta n t d is ti n c ti o n is b e tw e en k n o w le d g e re m em b e re d in t e rm s o f p e rs o n a l e x p e rie n c e a n d k n o w le d g e in th e fo rm o f l ea rn e d in fo rm a t io n n o t t ie d to m e m o rie s o f p e rs o n a l e x p e rie n c e i n a p a rt ic u la r tim e a n d p l ac e . W e id e n fe l d a n d L u t z (1 9 9 4 ) d is t in g u is h ``e x p eri e n t ia l’ ’ fro m ``a c q u ire d ’ ’ a t titu d e s , a so m e w h a t s im il a r d is t in ct io n in th is c o n te x t to e p is o d ic v e rs u s s e m a n t ic . 2
A s is e v id e n t fro m th e w o rd i n g , t h e ti m e p e rio d w a s n o t i n t e n d e d to b e ex a c tly 5 0 y e a rs , b e c a u se in
1 9 8 5 th a t w o u ld h a v e m a d e 1 9 3 5 th e p re c is e s t ar tin g p o i n t , w h e re a s th e b e n c h m a rk o f ``a b o u t ’ ’ 1 9 3 0 ’ ’ w as a ls o in c lu d e d i n th e q u e s ti o n . T h e a u t h o rs h a d w is h e d to a ll o w re sp o n d e n t s to i n c lu d e m e m o ra b le e v e n ts fro m t h e e arl y 1 9 3 0 s (e sp e c ia ll y t h e D e p re s s io n a n d re la t ed p o litic a l h a p p e n i n g s ) w i th o u t w o rry in g a b o u t t h e e x a c t s ta rt in g y ea r. N o t e a l so th a t th e w o rd in g o f th e q u e s tio n i s in te n d e d t o a l lo w , b u t n o t re q u ire , re s p o n d e n t s to ch o o s e e v e n ts th at h a d a d ire c tl y p ers o n a l im p a c t. A la t e r sp li t-s am p le e x p e rim e n t w as c a rrie d o u t in th e U n ite d S ta t es to d e t erm i n e w h e th e r o m i ttin g t h e p o s s ib ly p e rs o n a lisi n g w o rd s ``to y o u ’ ’ a t th e e n d o f th e m a in q u e s tio n w o u ld a ffe c t th e k in d o f e v e n t s ch o se n (S c h u m a n & R i eg e r, 1 9 9 6 ). O f 2 6 e v e n ts m e n tio n e d , o n ly tw o s h o w e d a s ig n i fic a n t d iffe re n c e b e tw e en e x p e rim e n t a l fo rm s (P < .0 5 , b a s e d o n N s o f 4 5 5 a n d 4 5 9 ) , b o th e v en ts b e in g in fre q u e n t i n c h o ic e o v e ra ll, a n d n o e v e n t s h o w e d a s i g n ifi ca n t a g e b y fo rm in te ra c tio n . T h e e x p e ri m en t s u g g e s ts th a t th e b a s ic q u e st io n f o rm u la ti o n is r o b u s t , n o t c h a n g e d im p o rt an tl y b y m in o r d i ffe ren c e s i n w o rd i n g .
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES
431
[I f on ly on e m en tio n a sk ] I s th er e a n y o th e r n a tio n al o r w o rld e ve n t or ch a n ge o v e r th e p as t 50 ye a rs th a t yo u f ee l w a s es pe c ia lly im p or ta n t? [A fte r e v e n ts a r e n am ed :] W h a t w as it a b ou t . . . th at m a ke s it se e m e sp ec ially im p o rtan t to y o u ?
T h e re q ue st to n am e im p ortan t e ve n ts a n d ch a ng e s m a y a p p ea r at first to a sk for ju dg e m en ts, ra th e r th a n m e m o rie s. H o w e ve r, th e q u estio n ta p s m e m o ries in the sen se o f w h a t is m os t sa lie nt or a cc essib le to resp o n d en ts, w h at ``c om e s to m in d’ ’ m o st rea d ily w h en th ey try to re c all p ub lic ev en ts o f th e p a st h alf-c e ntu ry w ith o u t an y g uid an c e o the r th a n th e su b je c tiv e w o rd ``im p o rta n t’ ’ . E vid e n ce from p ast re sea rc h w ith the sa m e q u estio n po in ts to th e im p ortan c e o f m e m o ry to th e ta sk (S ch u m a n & S c o tt, 19 8 9 ) an d is co n siste n t w ith oth e r e v id e n ce a bo u t w ha t is m e m o ra b le in pe rson a l live s (R u b in, R a hh a l, & P oo n , 1 9 9 6). F u rth e r 3 ev id en c e w ill b e p re sen ted h ere . W h en th e q u estion w a s a d ap ted fo r th e G e rm an su rv ey in 1 9 9 1, th e 5 0 -y ea r p eriod w as u p d ate d an d state d to b e fro m ``ab o u t 1 9 40 ’ ’ . T a ke n lite rally th is w ou ld elim in ate th e e a rly y ea rs o f N a z i ru le , a lth o u gh it in clu d e s a lm o st th e en tire W o rld W a r II p eriod , as w ell a s th e sy stem a tic e ffort to a nn ih ilate th e Jew s. H ow e v er, as in th e e arlie r U S stu d y , th e w o rd ``a b ou t’ ’ (G erm a n : ``e tw a ’ ’ ) b efo re 1 9 4 0 a llo w e d re sp on d e nts fre ed o m to re ac h b ac k in to th e 19 3 0 s an d sev e ral refe rre d to H itler’ s ac c essio n to po w e r in 1 9 3 3. T h e fu ll G e rm a n w o rdin g 4 is g iv en in th e A p p en d ix. A d iffe ren t p ro ble m p re se nte d itself w h e n th e o rig in a l E n g lish qu e stio n w a s ad a p te d for th e Jap a n ese su rv ey . T h e ch ron olo gy use d in th e W e st is no t so w ell k no w n in Jap an , an d in ste a d it w a s n e ce ssar y to refe r to ``th e b eg in n in g o f th e S h ow a E ra ’ ’ , th e start o f th e re ig n of E m p e ro r H iro hito [lite rally 1 9 26 ], in d esc rib in g th e p erio d to b e c o nsid e re d . T his pla ce d th e fo rm a l starting p o in t b ac k e v en ea rlie r th a n 1 9 30 b ut, a s w ill b ec o m e ev id en t, few if a n y resp o n de n ts refe rre d to th e p re -W o rld W ar II p erio d. T he o rig in a l Jap a n ese q u estion is also inc lud e d in th e A p p e nd ix , an d b ac k tra nsla tio n s in to E n g lish sh o w hig h co n sisten c y w ith the o rig in al. 3
W h e n a c o m p re h en s iv e l is t o f e v e n ts s u c h a s W o rld W a r II w a s p re s e n t ed to a s a m p le o f
A m e ric a n s , th e ir c h o ic e s o f w h i ch w er e m o st i m p o rta n t n o lo n g e r s h o w e d th e re la ti o n s to c o h o rt d e s c rib e d l at e r h e re (u n p u b li sh e d d a ta ). In th is c as e , o n l y j u d g em e n t w a s i n v o l v e d , n o t m e m o ry . 4
T w o p ro b l em s o c cu rre d w i th th e G e rm a n tra n sl a tio n . F irs t, th e fo l lo w -u p `` W h y ’ ’ q u e st io n
o m i tte d t h e G e rm a n fo r th e w o rd ``s e e m s’ ’ a n d m a y e m p h a s is e m o re t h a n th e o rig in a l E n g l is h a p u re ly p e rso n a l e x p la n a tio n fo r c h o o s in g a n e v e n t. I t i s p o ss i b l e th a t th is in c re a se d th e p ro p o r tio n o f p e rs o n a l e x p la n a tio n s, b u t th e e x p e rim e n t re p o rt ed i n fo o t n o te 2 p r o v id e s so m e re a s s u ra n c e o n th is p o in t, a s d o e s t h e f ac t th a t a g re a t m a n y G e rm a n s g av e im p e rs o n a l e x p la n a tio n s fo r c h o o s in g m a n y e v e n ts (s e e la t er m e n t io n o f t h e la rg e d iffe re n c e b e t w e e n p e rs o n a l e x p la n a tio n s fo r W o rl d W a r I I a n d fo r R e u n ifi ca tio n ). A se c o n d d i ffe re n c e b e tw e e n t h e G e rm a n a n d o rig in a l A m e ric a n q u e st io n s is th a t th e `` w h y ’ ’ q u e st io n w a s a s k e d b e fo re t h e i n t erv ie w e r h a d t rie d t o o b t a in a s e c o n d e v en t w h en o n ly o n e h a d b e e n g iv e n s p o n ta n e o u s ly . It is d o u b t fu l t h a t th is h a d a n y su b st a n t iv e e ffe c t, b u t i t m a y h a v e a ffe c te d t h e p ro p o rt io n o f p e o p le w h o g a v e a t l e a st tw o e v e n t s .
432
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
In m a k in g c o m p a riso n s b e tw e en G erm an a n d Ja pa n e se resp o nse s (or be tw e e n eithe r an d ea rlie r rese arc h on the U n ited S tate s), w e h a ve k ep t in m in d th e diffe re n ce s in th e start d ate g iv en to re spo n d en ts, b ut th e p rac tic al effe ct o f th is w ill b e se e n to b e n e glig ible . T h e e n d in g da te o f ``to d a y ’ ’ g iv e n in th e tw o co u ntrie s w a s alm o st id e n tic al, a s b o th su rve y s w ere ca rrie d o u t in e a rly 19 9 1 : th e Jap a ne se surv e y ra n fro m D e ce m be r, 1 9 90 , in to F e b ru a ry, 1 99 1 ; th e G e rm a n 5 surv e y fro m Ja n ua ry , 1 9 91 , in to M a rch , 1 9 9 1.
Sampling Considerations T h e G erm an d a ta w e re g ath ere d as p art o f a fac e -to -fac e su rv e y o f W e st G e rm an y (F R G ) b y th e In stitu t fuÈ r D e m o sk o pie A lle n sb ac h . T h e sa m ple em p lo y ed qu o ta s fo r lo ca tio n (b y state an d siz e o f c o m m un ity ), a ge , ge n d er, e m p lo y m e n t st a tu s , a n d o c c u p a ti o n , a n a p p r o a c h A l le n s b a c h h a s u s e d suc c essfu lly for a n um b e r of y ea rs. N o resp o n se rate is p o ssible fo r th is qu o ta-ty pe sa m p le . H o w ev e r, w e co m p are d th e sa m p le re su lts a g ain st ce n su s da ta for 19 9 1 for ag e , g e nd e r, e d u ca tio n , an d state o f resid en c e, a nd th e co rre spo n d en c e w a s n e arly p e rfe c t b y ag e , ge n de r, a n d sta te , a nd w ith so m e ov e rin c lusio n by se ve ral p erc en ta ge po in ts o f th e un iv ersity e du c a te d a n d un d er in c lu sion o f the lea st e d u ca ted Ð a c o m m on o u tc o m e o f a lm o st all c ro sssec tio n su rv e y s. O u r fin al G erm a n sa m p le siz e is 7 28 , a fter o m ittin g a sm all 6 nu m b er of ca se s (2 4 ) w ith m issin g da ta o n the E v en ts qu e stio n . W e sho u ld em p ha sise tha t w e m ak e n o atte m p t to ge n era lise o u r re su lts to w ha t w a s fo rm e rly E ast G e rm an y (G D R ), w h ic h ha d a q u ite d iffe re nt po st-w ar h isto ry fro m W e st G e rm a ny (se e, fo r e xa m p le , W e id e n feld & L u tz, 1 99 4 ). T h e Ja p an ese sa m p le th a t p rov id ed su bsta ntiv e resp o n se s to o u r q u estio n s 7 co n sists of 84 3 re spo n d en ts d raw n fro m th e G re ater Y ok o h am a are a. T h e 5
O n e o th e r d iffe re n c e b e tw e e n th e G e rm a n an d J a p a n e s e q u e s tio n s w a s in q u e s tio n n a ire l o c a ti o n .
O u r c o ll ec t iv e m e m o ri e s q u es t io n s in th e G e rm a n s u rv e y c a m e a t a lm o s t th e b e g in n i n g , a s w as m o s t d e s ira b le . T h e c o l le c tiv e m e m o rie s q u e s tio n s in th e Ja p a n e s e su rv ey c a m e a t th e v e ry e n d o f th e in te rv i e w , b u t th e res t o f t h a t s u rv e y d e a lt w it h m a t te rs e n t ire ly u n re la te d to m e m o ri e s o f th e p a st , p ri m ar ily is s u e s o f s o c ia l rel a tio n s a n d m en ta l h e a lth . T h e m a in d is a d v a n t ag e o f h a v in g o u r q u e st io n s a t th e e n d o f w h a t w a s a l o n g in te rv ie w co n si s tin g o f a g re a t m a n y c l o s e d q u e s ti o n s , w a s th a t m a n y re sp o n d e n t s w e re tire d a n d si m p l y s a id ``d o n ’ t k n o w ’ ’ to o u r o p e n -e n d e d q u e s ti o n s , as n o te d la t e r. 6
B e ca u s e o f l im it a tio n s o f re s o u rc e s w e h a d n o t em p lo y ed th e fu ll o rig in a l G e rm a n s a m p le
(N = 2 0 1 6 ), b u t d re w fro m it ra n d o m ly a n a p p ro x im a te 4 0 % s u b s a m p le to u s e fo r a ll tr an s la ti o n , c o d in g , a n d a n a ly si s . W e al s o o m i tt ed c o m p le te l y th e s m a ll n u m b e r o f re s p o n d e n ts (n = 2 1 ) le s s th a n 1 8 y e a rs o f a g e, b o t h to a ll o w f o r th e m o re u s e fu l c o n tro l o f e d u c a t io n a n d to m a k e th e fin d in g s c o m p a rab le to p re v io u s p u b l is h e d a n a ly se s w ith A m e ric a n d a ta . (C a s e s m is s in g o n s o m e o t h e r, b u t n o t al l, v a ri ab le s re m a in in th e s a m p l e , b u t w h e n th e e v e n ts q u e s ti o n is c ro s s- ta b u la te d w ith a g e, th e sa m p le s iz e b e c o m e s 7 0 6 .) 7
Y o k o h a m a ci ty itse lf h a d a n e s tim a te d p o p u la ti o n i n 1 9 9 4 o f 3 .3 m illio n , n o t c o u n ti n g
su rro u n d in g to w n s . W e h a v e a g a in o m itte d fro m o u r s a m p le a ll re s p o n d e n ts u n d e r 1 8 y e a rs o f a g e a n d a ls o o m itte d a s p e c ia l su p p l em e n ta ry s am p le o f m o th e rs , w h o a re n o t p a rt o f o u r ta rg e t p o p u la t io n .
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES
433
Ja p a n e s e s a m p l e h a d b e e n c o n s tru c te d u sin g d is p r o p o rt io n a te st ra t ifi e d p r o b a b ili ty s a m p lin g w ith i n a g e /g e n d e r c a te g o rie s i n o rd e r to in c re a se rep rese n tation fro m o lde r a ge gro u p s. D e v ia tio n s fro m th e n atio n a l p o p ula tio n b y g en d er w ere sligh t, bu t th e sam p le is o v e rw eig hte d a t th e o lde r a g e en d (6 0 an d ab o v e). T h is d o e s n o t bia s o u r prim ary in tere st in asso c ia tio n s w ith ag e itse lf, a nd ha s th e a d va n tag e o f in c rea sin g th e sta b ility o f re su lts fo r o lde r a d ults w he n sh ow in g p e rc e nta g es b y a g e. H o w e ve r, w h e re w e p re se n t u n iv a ria te resu lts inte n d ed to pro v ide a p p ro xim ate rep re se nta tion o f th e Ja p an e se na tion a l p op u latio n, w e h a v e re w eig h ted the d a ta to reflec t th e a g e d istrib u tio n fo r th e en tire c ou n try, as sh o w n late r in T a b le 2 . Jap a n is a h ig h ly h o m o g en e ou s c ou n try , a n d th is h o m o g e ne ity also ap p lie d to its e x p erie nc e du ring W o rld W a r II a nd m u ch su b seq u e nt h isto ry . T h e G re a te r T o k y o±Y o k o ha m a m e tro p o litan a re a a lon e c o n stitute s a p p ro x im a te ly a qu a rte r o f the to tal Ja p an e se p o pu lation (Jap a n S tatistica l A sso c iation , 1 99 7 ), an d o u r resu lts a re q u ite lik e ly a lso g en e ralisab le to m u c h o f u rb a n Jap a n, w h ich in 19 9 5 w as said to m ak e u p 7 8 % o f th e to ta l p op u latio n (U n ited N a tion s Sta tistica l Y ea rb o o k, 1 9 95 , T a b le 9 ). In ad d itio n , no n e of th e re la tio n s w e fo un d fo r o u r G erm an sa m p le differ ed sig nific a n tly b etw e en larg e c ities, sm a ll citie s, an d ru ra l are as, a n d it m a y b e th at th e sam e w o uld h o ld fo r Ja p an if su c h an a n aly sis c ou ld 8 b e c arried o u t.
Coding, Classification, and Analysis F o r b oth th e G erm an an d Ja pa n e se da ta, resp o n se s w ere first tra n slate d into E n g lish a nd the n co d ed , usin g c a te g orie s de riv e d fro m a pre lim ina ry re v ie w of a sam p le o f a nsw e rs in e a ch c o un try . C o din g w as g e n era lly straig h tfo rw ard , an d reliab ility c h ec ks fo r th e m ain e v en ts y ield ed ag re em en t o f m o re th an 90 % b etw ee n in d e pe n d en t co d ers. O ur m a jo r in d e p en d en t v a ria b le is a ge , a s w e a re e spe cia lly in tere sted in th e effe cts o f life ex p erie nc e s o ve r th e p ast h alf-c en tury . W e h a ve tran sfo rm e d ag e into 1 3 c ateg o ries, e a ch a fiv e-y e ar sp an ex c ep t at the be g inn in g (1 8 ±2 4 ) an d en d (80 & o ve r) o f th e ag e d istrib ution , an d w e u se th ese to p lot th e m e m o ries fo r ea c h p o pu la tio n , th u s a llo w ing g rap h ic a lly fo r no n -lin e arity . W e assu m e tha t 8
T h e e s tim a te d re s p o n s e ra te fo r t h e to t a l J a p a n e se s a m p le w a s 7 2 % . H o w e v e r, th e fu ll sa m p le fo r
th e J a p a n e s e p ro je c t in c lu d e d 5 0 9 re s p o n d e n t s w h o d id n o t a n sw e r o u r q u e s t io n s Ð th a t is , th e y s h o w u p s im p ly a s m is s in g d a ta o n o u r q u e st io n s a n d in m o s t c a se s in te rv ie w ers in d ic a t ed th a t t h e y a n s w e re d ``d o n ’ t k n o w ’ ’ . A s w e a ls o n o te d t h a t so m e i n t e rv i e w e r/P S U s h a d h ig h e r re s p o n se ra te s th a n o t h e rs , w e re p e a te d th e m a in re s u lts fo r th e % M e n tio n s c o lu m n i n T a b le 2 fo r o n ly th o se P S U s w ith re s p o n s e ra te s a b o v e 7 0 % . T h e n e w re s u l ts d iffe r b y le s s th a n 2 % fro m t h o s e in th e ta b le , w h i c h s tro n g ly in d ic a t es t h a t t h e n o n -re s p o n s e c a n b e t re a te d a s e s s e n ti a lly ra n d o m e rro r. It is a ls o lik e ly th a t t h e s m al le r n u m b e r o f J ap a n es e m e n ti o n s o f s e c o n d e v en ts th an t h e G e rm an s a m p le is d u e to th e s a m e re a s o n : m o re re lu c ta n ce o n th e p a rt o f b o th re s p o n d en ts a n d in te rv i ew e rs to t ry to o b ta i n a s e co n d e v en t. (S c h u m a n & S c o tt , 1 9 8 9 , re p o rt t h a t th ei r U S s a m p l es a ls o h a d a h ig h p ro p o rtio n o f re s p o n d e n t s (3 3 % ) g iv in g o n ly o n e e v en t.)
434
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
virtu ally a ll o f the a ge e ffe cts re p orte d h e re a re d u e to c oh o rt e x p erie nc e , n ot to 9 th e ag e in g p ro ce ss a s su ch . In a d ditio n to ag e , w e h av e tak e n in to ac c ou n t po ssib le effe cts d u e to g en d er, e du c atio n , a n d, fo r G e rm a n y, u rb an ±rura l 10 lo c a tio n. T h e m ain oth er v ariab le s u se d a re b ase d on the co n te n t o f th e re p o rte d m e m o rie s a nd w ill b e d e ve lop e d as w e p ro ce e d.
RESULTS Collective Memories in West Germany in 1991 T h e ev en ts m e n tio n e d m os t o fte n b y G e rm a ns a re p re sen te d in T a ble 1 , w hic h in c lu d e s a ll ev e nts g iv e n by a t le ast 3 % o f th e sam p le a n d a lso in d ic a te s th e ap p ro xim a te d ate a t w h ic h ea ch ev e nt o cc u rre d . T h e p e rc e nta g es g iv ing ea c h ev e nt as 1 st m en tio n o r 2 n d m e n tio n a re sh o w n in th e tab le, w ith th e pe rce n ta g es ad d ing to 1 00 fo r e a ch c o lu m n . M o re im p o rta nt fo r m o st o f o u r an a lysis, th e pe rc en tag e o f th e to ta l N (7 2 8) th at g av e a n ev e n t (re ga rd le ss o f w h e th e r m e n tio n ed 1 st o r 2 n d) is p rov id ed in th e ne x t c o lum n. F o r ex a m p le, 50 .7 % o f th e G e rm an re sp o n de n ts g av e R e u nifica tio n as eith er th e ir 1 st o r 2 n d m en tion , w h ic h im p lie s th a t 4 9 .3 % o f th o se g iv in g a n y e v e n t d id n o t m e n tio n R e u n ifica tio n a t a ll. T w o c a te g o rie s d o m in at e th e G e rm a n re sp o n se s: W o rl d W a r II a n d R e u n ifica tio n , w ith th e fo rm e r m o re fre q u en t for first m e n tio n s an d th e la tte r m u c h m or e so for se co n d m e n tio n s an d a lso fo r % M e ntio ns o v era ll. A s m o st re sp o n de n ts g av e tw o d iffe ren t e ve n ts, the y w ere n o t forc ed to ch o o se be tw e e n W o rld W a r II an d R eu n ific ation . Y et o f th o se w h o ga v e tw o ev e n ts, o ne o f w h ich w a s e ith e r W o rld W a r II o r R eu n ific a tio n , on ly 15 % m en tio ne d bo th. T h e re st m e n tio ne d o ne o f th e o th er six e v en ts liste d in T a ble 1, or g a ve an in fre q u en t ev e nt co d e d a s ``O the r’ ’ (e .g . sev e n re sp on d en ts in th e to tal sa m ple m en tion e d as e sp ec ially im p o rtan t a so cc e r ch am p ion sh ip g a m e ). R ela tio n s to C o h o rt. W e e x am in ed th e a sso c ia tio n s of ea c h o f th e six ev e nts to c o ho rt (rep res en ted by a g e in 1 9 9 1), w ith e d uc a tio n , g e nd e r, a n d 9
T h e re i s a c c u m u la ti n g e v i d e n c e th a t, e x c e p t at e x tre m e o ld a g e , th e a g ei n g p ro c es s a m o n g a d u l ts
d o e s n o t p ro d u ce p a rt ic u l a r e ffe c ts s u c h a s a n in c re a si n g ly c o n s e rv a tiv e o u t lo o k . (S e e D a v i s, 1 9 9 2 ; D an ig e lis & C u tle r, 1 9 9 1 ; K ro sn ic k & A l w in , 1 9 8 9 ; T y l er & S ch u lle r, 1 9 9 1 .) 10
A g e w a s a l re ad y p re c o d e d in to c a te g o rie s in th e G e rm a n d a ta w e re c e iv e d , a n d w e th en m a tc h e d
th o s e c a te g o rie s in d i v i d i n g th e J a p a n e s e d a ta i n t o a g e g ro u p s . T h e re su lt in g a g e c a te g o rie s a re q u i te c lo s e to th o s e u s e d b y S c h u m a n a n d S c o tt (1 9 8 9 ). F o r t h o s e w h o p re fe r c o h o rt b i rth d at e s, t h e X -a x is la b e l s in o u r fig u r es w o u ld re ad : b o rn b e fo re 1 9 1 2 , 1 9 1 2 ±1 9 1 6 , 1 9 1 7 ±2 1 , 1 9 2 2 ±2 6 , 1 9 2 7 ±3 1 , 1 9 3 2 ± 3 6 , 1 9 3 7 ±4 1 , 1 9 4 2 ±4 6 , 1 9 4 7 ±5 1 , 1 9 5 2 ±5 6 , 1 9 5 7 ±6 1 , 1 9 6 2 ±6 6 , 1 9 6 7 ±7 3 . N o te th at t h e J ap a n es e sa m p le is o ld e r o n a v e ra g e th a n th e G e rm a n s am p le , p rim a ril y b e c a u s e o f th e o v e rsa m p lin g n o te d e arl ie r, b u t t h i s is c o n tro lle d w h e n w e m a k e d e t ai le d c o m p a ris o n s (e .g . b e tw e e n F ig s . 1 a n d 2 ). F o r b o th th e G erm a n an d Ja p a n e s e d a t a, th e o ld e s t a g e g ro u p (8 0 y e a rs o f ag e a n d o v e r) s h o u ld b e re g a rd e d w ith s p e c ia l c a u tio n , a s it c o v er s a w id e ra n g e o f y e a rs a n d is m o re lik e ly th an y o u n g e r a g e c at e g o rie s to in c lu d e so m e p e o p l e w i th s e ri o u s p h y s ic a l o r m e n t al d e fic i ts .
435
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES TABLE 1 Most Frequently Mentioned Events and Changes: German Sample % 1 st M e n ti o n
% 2 n d M e n t io n
% M e n t io n s
R e u n ifi c a tio n (1 9 9 0 )
2 6 .6
2 4 .0
5 0 .7
W o rld W a r II (1 9 3 9 ±4 5 )
3 2 .1
5 .6
3 7 .8
D iv is io n o f G e rm an (1 9 4 5 )
8 .4
5 .9
1 4 .3
G u l f W a r (1 9 9 0 ±9 1 )
3 .3
7 .1
1 0 .4
E c o n o m ic M i ra cl e b e g u n (1 9 4 8 )
2 .5
4 .5
7 .0
E n d o f C o ld W a r (1 9 8 9 )
3 .3
3 .2
6 .5
F o u n d in g o f F R G (1 9 4 9 )
3 .6
2 .3
5 .9
E u ro p e a n C o m m u n ity (1 9 6 7 )
2 .5
1 .5
4 .0
O th e r
1 7 .7
1 9 .8
N o 2 n d M e n ti o n
Ð N
1
1
2 6 .0
1 00
1 00
(7 2 8 )
(7 2 8 )
E a c h ro w re p re s e n t s a d i c h o to m y o f th o s e m en ti o n in g th e e v e n t a t a ll d iv id e d b y t h e to ta l n u m b e r
o f re sp o n d en ts (7 2 8 ) m en ti o n in g a t l e as t o n e e v e n t .
u rb a n ±ru ra l lo ca tio n c o ntro lle d , u sin g lo gistic re gre ssio n w ith a n d w ith o ut a q ua d ratic te rm fo r a g e, an d a lso m u ltip le c lassifica tio n a n aly sis (A n d rew s, M org a n , S o nq u ist, & K lem , 1 9 73 )Ð the form er m ore a pp ro p ria te g iv e n th e d ic h oto m ise d e ve n ts, th e latter co n v en ien t fo r stu d yin g n o n-lin ea rity in d e ta il. T h e tw o typ e s o f a n aly sis y ie ld e ssen tially th e sa m e re su lts, a nd ne ith e r ed u c atio n n o r ge n de r n or u rb an ±ru ra l lo c ation is g en e rally re la te d to m e n tio nin g 11 a p articu la r e ve n t. A s th e asso c iation o f a g e to m e n tio n in g an ev e nt is in n o ca se c h an g e d im p o rta n tly b y c on tro lling fo r e d uc a tio n a n d g e nd e r in eithe r th e G erm an o r Ja pa n e se d a ta (n o r by u rb an ±ru ral lo ca tio n in th e G erm an d a ta ), w e w ill p re sen t th e a g e rela tio n s g ra ph ic ally in th e sim p le fo rm of the pe rce n tag e g iv ing a pa rtic u lar ev e nt fo r ea ch o f ou r 1 3 a g e c ate go rie s. F ig u re 1 re p orts th e c ro ss-ta b ula tio n o f % M e n tio ns o f W o rld W a r II an d R eu n ific ation b y ag e . A s e x pe c ted , the y sh o w v e ry c le a r rev e rse a ssoc iatio ns. O ld e r p eo p le ten d to c h o ose W o rld W a r II: u sin g the m id -p oin t (ag e 77 ) o f th e p ea k a ge ra ng e fo r the W o rld W ar II cu rv e, the se resp o n d en ts w e re 2 5 y e ars o ld 11
E d u c a tio n i s re la te d p o s it iv e ly (P < .0 5 ) to m e n tio n i n g th e tw o m o re i n t er n a ti o n al e v e n ts , E n d o f
th e C o ld W ar a n d C re a tio n o f th e E u ro p e a n C o m m u n it y , b u t n o t to t h e o th e r e v e n t s. T h is i s q u i te d i ffe re n t fr o m w h a t a re m o re c le a rly s em a n ti c m e m o rie s (k n o w le d g e a b o u t th e w o rld ), w h e re e d u c a tio n i s a m a j o r c o rre la te in v i rtu a lly al l c a s e s (J e n n i n g s , 1 9 9 6 ; S c h u m a n , B e ll i, & B is c h o p i n g , 1 9 9 7 ). G e n d e r is re la te d to t h e m e n t io n o f o n ly o n e e v e n t : m e n a re si g n ifi c a n tly m o r e li k e l y to m e n t io n th e fo u n d in g o f t h e F e d er al R e p u b l ic o f G er m a n y (F R G ). U r b a n ±ru ra l lo ca t io n is s ig n i fic a n tly re la te d to m e n tio n s o f W o r ld W a r II (ru ra l g iv e s lig h tly m o re m e n t io n s ) a n d D iv i s io n o f G e rm an y ( u rb a n g iv e s li g h tl y m o re ).
436
FIG. 1.
W o rl d W a r II , R e u n ifi c at io n , a n d t h e E u ro p e a n C o m m u n it y fo r G er m a n s.
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES
437
w he n G e rm an y be g an th e w ar b y in v ad in g P o lan d an d w ere e n te rin g th eir thirtie s w h en th e w ar e nd e d . Y o un g e r p e o ple , e spe c ially 1 8 to 2 4 y e ar o ld s, ten d to m en tio n R eu n ific a tio n, w h ic h h ad o cc u rred o ffic ia lly in 19 9 0 , th e y e ar b e fore the su rv ey , a n d h ad b e en fo resh a d o w e d a t th e en d o f 1 9 89 b y th e o p e nin g o f th e B erlin W a ll. If w e trea t th e pe ak fo r th e o lde r co h o rt a s re lia b ly e sta b lish e d, d esp ite th e sm a ll nu m be r of c ase s (3 7 ), this ex ten d s th e c ritica l ag e p e rio d b ey o nd th e m id-tw en ties, an d o f co u rse th e p e ak fo r th e yo u n ge r c oh o rt m a y b e less th a n the 1 8 to 2 4 ra n ge th a t d efine s th a t e nd of o u r sa m p le ’ s ag e ra n ge . (T h e third e v en t in F ig. 1 , E u ro p e, is d iscu sse d la te r.) O f th e re m a inin g e v en ts in T ab le 1, bo th o f the tw o m o st rec en t e v en tsÐ G u lf W a r a n d E n d o f th e C old W a rÐ sh o w sig n ifica n t re lation s in the sam e d irec tio n as R eu n ific a tio n, w ith d isp ro p o rtio n ate m en tio n s b y y o un g e r G e rm a ns. T w o ev e n ts fro m th e ea rly p o st-w a r y ea rs, th e ``E c on o m ic M ira cle’ ’ (w h ich is o fte n d ated fro m th e 19 4 8 cu rre nc y refo rm b u t w h ich e x te n d ed fo r a d e ca d e o r m ore ) an d the fou n d in g o f th e F e de ra l R e pu b lic o f G e rm a ny (in 1 9 49 ), bo th sh o w no n sign ific a nt tren d s to b e m en tion e d m o re o fte n by o ld e r G erm an s. T h e la st e v en t liste d in T a b le 1 rev e als a cu rviline a r re la tion to a g e, as sh o w n in F ig. 1: th e E u rop e a n C om m u n ity , w h ich w as initia te d in 1 9 57 as th e E E C an d the n d e v elo pe d m o re fu lly in a p olitic a l d ire ctio n in 1 9 6 7. T h e E C is m en tio ne d d isp ro po rtion a te ly b y G e rm a n s of a rou n d 4 0 y e ars o f a ge in 19 9 1 Ð c o h orts tha t w ere in th eir la te te en s in the m id -six tie s (P < .0 6 fo r th e a dd e d q u ad ra tic term in a lo g istic reg ress io n w ith e d uc a tio n , se x , a n d urb a n±ru ral lo ca tio n c o ntro lle d ). H ere it w o uld b e h elp ful if w e h a d a co n ten t a na ly sis o ve r tim e o f m a ss m e dia an d p erh ap s sc ho o l te ac h in g to d e te rm in e th e d a te of m a x im u m p u blic a tte n tio n o n th is e v en t. O ne o the r e v en t in T ab le 1, D ivisio n o f G erm an y , fa ils to sho w m u ch sig n o f a relatio n to c o ho rt, w h ich se e m s o d d a s the d ivisio n oc c ur re d a t th e en d o f W o rld W ar II a n d the refo re sho u ld ha v e ha d its m ajo r im p ac t o n th e o ld e r co h o rts. H o w ev e r, D iv isio n is th e co m ple m e n t of R e u n ifica tio n a n d the refo re m a y w e ll h av e b e en b ro ug h t to m in d for yo u n ge r p e o ple b y the sa lie n ce o f R eu n ific ation . W e d ivid ed th e sa m p le into tw o p arts: th e Y o u n g (a ge s 1 8 to 5 4 ) an d the O ld (a g es 5 5 an d u p ), w ith the d istin ctio n th e a p pro x im ate p o in t in F ig . 1 at w h ic h th e tw o line s c ro ss. W e the n fou n d th a t 5 1 % of th ose in th e Y ou n g ca teg o ry w h o c h ose D iv isio n a lso g av e R e un ific atio n a s a no th er resp o n se, w he rea s on ly 2 6 % o f th ose in th e O ld ca teg o ry w ho ch o se D ivisio n g av e R eu n ific ation as w e ll (P < .0 2 fo r the differe nc e , F ish e r’ s E x a ct T e st). T h us, m e n tio n o f D iv isio n o f G erm a ny is tied m o re c lo se ly to th e sa lie n ce o f R eu n ific ation fo r y o u n ge r G erm an s tha n for o lde r G e rm an s. M u c h m o re dra m atic th an th e official R e u nific a tio n o f G erm an y w as th e fall o f th e B erlin W all a little m o re th an a y e ar p rio r to o u r su rv ey . W e c o de d sep a rate ly a n y m e n tio n o f th e W all, re g ard less of w h e the r it o cc u rre d as p art o f an o the r c o da b le an sw e r o r n o t. W e the n d istin g uish e d b etw ee n th o se w ho sp ok e o nly o f th e c rea tio n of th e W a ll (n = 5 0) a n d th ose w h o sp o k e o n ly o f its
438
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
de stru ctio n (n = 5 0 ), o m ittin g 1 7 ca se s w h ere b oth w ere m en tion e d o r th e re fe ren c e w a s am big u o us. F or the 1 0 0 re sp on d en ts w h ere th e re fe ren c e w a s cle ar, th e rela tio n to a g e is h igh ly sig n ific a nt ( t = ± .2 5, P < .0 1 ), a nd d e spite th e sm a ll n u m b er o f ca se s a d istinc t pa tte rn is ev id e nt. O f th o se w h o w ere 4 0 ±4 9 in 19 9 1 (w h ic h m e a ns a g es 10 to 1 9 w he n the W a ll w a s e rec ted in 1 96 1 ), 8 9 % m e n tio n the b u ild in g o f the W all a nd o nly 1 1 % m e n tio n its fall. O f th o se ag e d 18 ±2 9 in 19 9 1 a nd th u s just a y e ar y o u ng e r w h en th e W a ll c a m e d o w n at the e n d of 1 98 9 , 7 3 % m e n tio n its d estru c tio n a n d o n ly 27 % its c rea tio n . R esp o n de n ts ov e r a g e 5 0 a re n o t d istin c tiv e in th eir m e n tio n of e ith er cre a tio n (5 6 % ) o r de stru ctio n (44 % ) o f the W a ll. T h ese re su lts p ro v ide furth er e vid e nc e o f th e spe c ific ity o f th e ag e a t w h ic h a v ery dra m a tic e v en t h a s its m ax im u m im p ac t o n m e m o ry . T he ea rly p ea k for a ge s 10 to 1 9 fo r the b uildin g of the W a ll fits a sug g es tio n b y S ch u m a n a n d S co tt (19 8 9 , p p .3 6 6±3 6 7 ) reg a rdin g m em orie s o f Joh n K e nn e dy ’ s a ssassin a tio n an d de ta ile d e v id e nc e in S c hu m an a nd C o rn in g (1 9 9 7) th at visu ally d ram atic ev e n ts a re lik ely to im prin t a y o un g er a ge gro u p th a n w ill e q ua lly im p o rta n t bu t m o re a b stra ct e ve n ts. P e rson a l C o n n ec tio n s. T w o -th ird s (6 8% ) o f th o se 5 5 ye a rs o f ag e an d ov e r ga v e a c le a rly p e rso n al re as on w h e n e x pla in in g th e ir c h oic e o f W o rld W a r II, e.g . ``I lo st m y le ft a rm the re’ ’ ’ ``I a lw ay s fe are d a ir-ra id w arn in g s’ ’ ; ``I lo st m y bro th er in the w a r’ ’ . A m o ng th o se un d e r ag e 55 , the p erc e n ta g e g ivin g a p e rs o n a l re a s o n f o r h a v i n g m e n t io n e d W o rl d W a r II ( e .g . ` `L o s t m y gra n d fa the r’ ’ ) is m u c h lo w er , alth ou g h still n o t trivia l in pro p or tio n (2 4 % ). H o w e ve r, th e p rop o rtio n o f pe rso n al re fe ren c es (e.g . ``V isits o f relativ es are po ssib le a g ain ’ ’ ) w h en e x pla in in g th e im p ortan c e o f R eu n ific atio n is m u c h sm a lle rÐ ju st 4% Ð w h ic h sug g e sts th a t pe rson a l co n ten t m a y b e le ss esse n tia l fo r m ak in g a n e v en t m e m o ra ble if it is q uite re ce n t. T h e re w er e n o p e rso na l co n ne c tio n s at all for m e n tio n s o f th e G u lf W a r, a lth o u gh so m e resp o n de n ts d id ex p ress an x ieties a b o ut it d ev e lop ing in to a la rg er c on flict. M e m o ries of re ce n t dra m a tic p u b lic ev e n ts ca n d raw o n c u rre n t o r rec en t m ed ia a c co u n ts. E arly ev e nts a re m or e lik e ly to de p en d o n p erso n al e xp e rie n ce s tha t h av e sta y ed a liv e fo r a n in d iv id u al an d th u s rec u r as m em o rie s w ith little o r n o e xte rn a l stim ula tio n . G e rm a n G u ilt. A c co rd in g to B uru m a (19 9 4 ), m a n y G e rm a n s fe el a g rea t de a l of gu ilt ov e r th e N a zi e ra g en e rally an d o v er th e a nn ih ila tio n o f the Je w s in pa rtic u lar. H o w e ve r, w o rd s c le arly c on n o tin g g uilt o ve r th e N a zi p erio d w e re seld o m a p pa re nt in the se re sp o n ses . S o m e re sp on d en ts d id re fe r to H itle r a s cra z y o r w ere o th erw ise c on d e m n a to ry o f th at tim e (5 % o f th e sa m p le , a n d sho w in g n o rela tio n to a g e), b ut as th is d id n o t in v o lv e pe rso na l sta te m e n ts o f re sp o n sib ility, it c ou ld b e se e n m o re as a w a y o f d ista nc ing o ne se lf fro m th e N a z i era th a n as a sig n o f pe rso na l g uilt. M o re o v er, a s K oo n z (19 9 4 , p .2 6 1 ) em p ha sises , ``G er m a ns g en e rally h ad n ot suffe red un d e r N a zi ru le u ntil th e tid es
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES
439
o f w ar tu rn e d’ ’ , so th ose w h o liv ed th ro u gh th a t pe riod as a du lts h ad little p erso n al re aso n to b e critic a l, w ha tev e r th e ir p o st-w a r lea de rs m a y h av e told the m a b o ut N az i crim e s. O nly 7 o f the 7 28 G e rm a n re sp on d e n ts m e n tio n e d Je w s at a ny p o in t in th eir an sw e rs, u sua lly b y refe rrin g to th e ir a nn ih ila tio n (``J ud e nv e rnic h tu n g ’ ’ ) d urin g the N az i e ra. A g ain st th e p o ssib ility th a t o u r q ue stio n s m a y h a v e so m e h o w fa ile d to ta p the im p o rta n c e o f this p a rtic u la r m e m o ry , w e n o te th at 1 7 resp o n de n ts m e n tio n ed th e first la nd in g o n th e m o on a s im p o rta n tÐ n o t a re ce nt e v en t, n o r 12 o ne c lo se r in pe rso n al term s th an th e d estru ctio n o f th e Jew s. If w e div id e th e sm all n u m b e r w ho d o m e n tio n th e killin g o f Je w s by o u r Y ou n g (1 8±5 4 ) an d O ld (55 a n d u p ) c ateg o ries, a ll se ve n o f th e resp o n de n ts co m e fro m th e Y o u n g a g e g ro up (P = .0 5 by F ish er’ s E x ac t T est). G e rm a n s u nd e r 5 5 a t the tim e o f o u r su rve y w e re less th a n 1 0 y e ars old in 1 9 45 an d in m o st c a ses n ot ev e n b orn at th a t po in t. T h is fits o th e r a cc o u nts th a t ind ica te tha t stro n g reg ret a m o n g G erm a n s te n d s, w h e n it oc c urs, to ch a ra cterise th o se to o y ou n g to h a ve ha d a n y d ire c t in v o lv e m en t in th e N a z i p erio d, m u ch m o re tha n tho se w h o a ctu ally liv e d th ro u g h the p e rio d th em se lv e s a nd o f c ou rse in so m e ca se s m a y h a v e p a rtic ip a te d to o n e d e gre e o r a no th er in it (B ro w n in g , 1 9 9 2). O ld e r ad u lts w e re m uc h m o re lik ely to d w ell in the ir m e m o ries o n th e ir o w n su ffe rin g u n de r bo m b in g , sh o rta ge s o f fo o d , a nd e ne m y o cc u p atio n, ra th er tha n o n the suffe rin g o f oth e rs, e sp ec ially o the rs w h o se fate m igh t a d d th e p ain o f 13 g uilt to th a t o f d efe at. T h u s, w ith reg a rd to W orld W ar II, ou r q u estio ns ap p ea re d to stim u late m e m o ries o f a u to b iog ra p hic al ex p er ie n ce , w he re as m u c h o f th e p o st-w a r em p ha sis on N az i crim e s ha s in v o lv e d a k ind of lea rn ing tha t c rea te s se m a n tic m e m o ries. A c on c e rn w ith N a z i crim e s b ec a m e a m a tte r o f p u blic d isc ussio n o nly in the 1 96 0 s, first a t a m o re in te lle c tu a l le ve l, inc lud in g d e ba tes a m o n g h isto ria n s a bo u t the n a tu re a n d un iqu e n ess o f th e ``F in a l S o lu tio n ’ ’ (M iller, 1 99 0 ). S till la te r th e re w as w ide r po p u lar in v o lve m e n t, in p art b e ca u se o f th e m a d e-fo r-te lev ision se ries ca lle d H o loc a u st, w h ich a llo w e d e asy id e n tifica tio n w ith sto ck figu re s fro m th e p a st. A c co rd in g to B uru m a (1 9 9 4, p .8 8 ), w h e n it w a s sh ow n in 1 9 79 the se rie s w a s se en b y h a lf the a du lt p o p ula tio n o f W e st G erm an y . H e q u o te s a n a rtic le b y H e inz H o eh n e in D e r S p ie g el: A n A m e ric an tele v isi on s er ie s , m a d e in a triv ia l st yle, p ro du c e d m o r e f or co m m e r cia l th a n fo r m o ra l r ea s on s, m o re fo r e nter ta inm en t th an f o r e nlig h te n m en t, 12
H ei n ri c h (1 9 9 6 ) u s e d th e s a m e S ch u m an a n d S c o tt (1 9 8 9 ) o p e n -e n d e d e v e n t q u e st io n in a s e lf-
a d m i n i st e re d su rv e y in 1 9 9 5 a n d re p o rt s th a t 1 0 % o f W e s t G e rm a n s m e n t io n e d Je w s . T h is m a y b e p a rt ly b e c a u s e h i s tra n s l at io n o f th e fo ll o w -u p ``w h y ’ ’ q u e s ti o n w a s s o m e w h a t b et te r, b u t ev e n m o re li k e ly b e c a u s e h is o p e n q u e s tio n w a s p re c e d e d b y a c lo se d q u es t io n co n ce rn in g re sp o n s ib il ity fo r d e a l in g w it h th e a n n ih il at io n o f J e w s . M o re o v e r, e v en if t h e tr u e fig u re i s s o m e w h e re b e t w ee n 1 % a n d 1 0 % , it w o u ld st ill b e q u i te sm a l l. 13
T h e re is n o s ig n o f a re la ti o n b e tw e e n m e n tio n s o f J ew s a n d e it h e r e d u c a tio n o r s e x .
440
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
a c c om plis h e d w h at h u nd re d s of b oo k s, p la y s, film s , an d telev isi on p ro g ra m s , th ou sa n d s o f d o c u m e n ts, an d all th e c o n c e n tratio n ca m p tria ls h av e fa ile d to d o in th e m o r e th a n th re e d e c a de s s in c e the e nd of th e w a r : to in f or m G e r m a ns ab o u t c r im e s a g ain st Je w s c o m m itte d in th eir n a m e , so th a t m illio n s w er e em o tio n ally to uc h ed an d m o v ed .
Y e t w ith o u t q u estio nin g th e im m e d ia te e m o tio n a l p o w e r o f su ch a film , it is do u b tfu l th at a vic ario us ex p e rie n ce o f th is k ind ca n h av e a d e ep an d la stin g im pa c t o n m em ory fo r a la rge r p ub lic . It is p ossib le fo r in d ivid u als in all co u ntrie s to e m e rg e fro m a d a rk e n ed th e a tre w ith te a rs in th eir e y es, y e t w ith in a fe w h o urs o r da y s to h av e la rg ely fo rg o tte n th e e x pe rie n c e in a w ay th at w ou ld no t ha v e h ap p en e d if th e ir tea rs h a d flow e d o u t o f d irec t in vo lv em e nt in a rea llife ev e nt. U n lik e W orld W a r II, re ce n t ev e n ts suc h a s R eu n ific atio n an d th e G u lf W a r do se e m to h av e b ee n m e n tio n ed fre qu e ntly o n th e b asis o f se m a ntic m e m o ries, as in d ica te d b y th e fin d ing th at th e y seld o m p ro d u c ed e xp la n atio n s th at in v o lv e d pe rso n al ex p er ie n ce . T h is lea d s ag a in to th e h y p o th e sis th at m en tio n o f re ce n t pu b lic e v en ts (as w ell as m e m o ries o f e arly e ve n ts by c u rren t co h o rts) are usu a lly le ss d ep e nd e n t on e p iso dic m e m o ry . O f co u rse , w he re rec en t e v en ts d o in v o lv e im po rta nt p erso n al ex p e rie nc e , this sh ou ld serv e to su sta in th e m e m o ry of th e e v en t in fu tu re y e ars.
Collective Memories in Yokohama, Japan, in 1991 E v e n ts th a t w e re m e n tio n ed b y m o re tha n 3 % of Y o k o h am a re sp on de n ts are pre se nte d in T ab le 2 . W orld W a r II w a s b y fa r the m ost freq u en t, g iv en b y 14 w e ll o v er h alf th e Y o k o ha m a resp o n de n ts, alth ou g h c e rta in ly n o t a ll. The G u lf W ar , w h ich h ad o cc u rred ju st a few m o n th s b efo re th e su rve y be g an , w a s a d ista n t sec o nd fo r th e Ja p an e se . T hird w ere re fere n ce s to th e Im p e ria l S y ste m . G e rm a n R e u n ific ation , w h ic h in clu de d m en tio ns of th e fa ll o f th e 14
J ap a n e s e re s p o n d en ts m e n t io n i n g w h a t A m e ric an s a n d E u ro p e a n s c a ll W o r ld W a r II s o m e tim e s
re fe rre d to it a s th e ``G re at e r E a st A s ia n W a r’ ’ o r th e ` `P a c ific W a r’ ’ . B u ru m a (1 9 4 4 , p .4 7 ) s ta te s th at th e ``G re a te r E as t A s ia n W a r’ ’ is a s s o c i at e d w i th th e i d e a t h a t p rio r to 1 9 4 1 ``J a p a n w a s fig h tin g a w ar to li b e ra te A si a fro m B o l sh e v i s m a n d w h it e c o lo n i a lism ’ ’ , a n d h e im p lie s th at p e o p le w h o e m p lo y t h e te rm s till h o ld t o t h i s b el ie f. H e a ls o c la i m s th a t ``. . . o n l y J a p a n e s e o f a li b e ra l d is p o s it io n c al l W o r ld W a r II th e P a c if ic W a r’ ’ . O f th e 5 2 9 re s p o n s es c o d e d a s m e n tio n in g W o rld W ar II, 5 8 re fe rre d to it as t h e ``G re a te r E a s t A si a n W a r’ ’ , a n d th e se p e o p le w e re l a rg e ly (a n d si g n ifi c a n tly ) th e o l d e s t i n o u r s a m p le Ð al l b u t th re e w e re b o rn b e fo re 1 9 4 1 . H o w e v e r, i t is n o t c le a r th a t th is u s a g e h a s a c o n t in u i n g p o l itic a l s ig n ific a n ce , fo r t h e c o n te n t o f th e ir re sp o n s e s is m o st ly a b o u t s u ffe ri n g d u ri n g W o rld W ar II, j u s t as a re th e re s p o n s e s th a t u s e th e te rm W o rld W a r II. N o t a s in g le o n e c o n t a in e d p o li tic a l co n te n t o f th e ty p e su g g e s te d b y B u ru m a o r re fe rre d to p re -1 9 4 1 co n flic t s. R e fe re n c e s to th e ``P a c ifi c W a r’ ’ a re n o t d is tin c tiv e i n a g e a t a ll , n o r d o e s t h e ir u sa g e i n c lu d e o b v io u s p o li tic a l v ie w s o f a n y k in d . T h u s w e h a v e n o e v i d e n c e fo r th e p o litic a l c o n n o ta ti o n s o f t h e te rm s e m p l o y e d to re fe r to th e w a r, a lt h o u g h w e a re li m ite d in th e d eg re e t o w h ic h w e a re a b l e to e x p l o re th is is s u e w it h o u r d a ta .
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES
441
B erlin W a ll in 1 9 89 , ca m e ne x t, fo llo w e d b y th e 1 9 7 3 A ra b b o yc o tt of oil (kn o w n in Ja p an as ``th e O il S h o c k’ ’ ), an d fin a lly a ca te g o ry im p o ssible to 15 d a t e w i th a n y p r e c is io n , E n v i ro n m e n ta l is su e s. W h en the Y oko ham a p erc en ta ge s a re a d ju ste d to re fle c t th e co u ntry -w id e a ge d istrib u tio n (th e la st co lu m n in T a ble 2 ), th e pe rc en tag e m en tio n in g W o rld W a r II g oe s d o w n b y ab o u t 1 0 % a n d a ll o the r resp o n ses g o up b y 1 % to 3 % , w h ich d ec re ase s th e g ap be tw e e n th e m o st re m e m be red ev e nt a nd all o th ers, b u t d oe s no t ch an g e b asic co n clu sio n s. T h e p rop o rtio ns o f first v e rsus sec o n d m e n tio ns for m o st e ve n ts are n o t ve ry d iffe re n t, e x ce p t tha t w h e n W o rld W ar II is m e n tio n ed it is a lm o st a lw a ys g iv e n first, te stify in g fu rth er to its im p o rta n ce in th e m ind s o f th o se w ho g ive it a t a ll. In th e U n ited S ta te s, a la rg e r p ro p o rtio n o f W o rld W ar II re sp on se s, a q u arter, w ere g iv en a s se c on d m e ntion s (S ch u m a n & S c o tt, 19 8 9 ). E v en afte r ad ju stin g
TABLE 2 Most Frequently Mentioned Events and Changes: Japanese Sample % 1 s t M e n t io n W o rld W a r II (1 9 4 1 ±4 5 )
% 2 n d M en ti o n
% M en ti o n s
1
W e ig h t e d
6 0 .3
2 .5
6 2 .8 %
5 3 .1 %
G u l f W a r (1 9 9 0 ±9 1 )
8 .1
5 .4
1 3 .5 %
1 6 .4 %
E m p e ro r (1 9 8 9 )
5 .0
3 .9
8 .9 %
1 0 .2 %
G e rm an U n i ty (1 9 9 0 )
4 .7
3 .1
7 .8 %
1 0 .2 %
O il S h o c k (1 9 7 3 )
2 .4
1 .5
3 .9 %
5 .1 %
E n v i ro n m e n ta l
1 .5
1 .9
3 .4 %
4 .5 %
O th e r
1 8 .0
2 7 .0
N o 2 n d M e n ti o n
Ð
5 4 .7
N 1
10 0
10 0
(8 4 3 )
(8 4 3 )
2
E a c h ro w re p re s e n t s a d i c h o to m y o f th o s e m en ti o n in g th e e v e n t a t a ll d iv id e d b y t h e to ta l n u m b e r
o f re sp o n d en ts (8 4 3 ) m en ti o n in g a t l e as t o n e e v e n t . 2
P e rc e n t ag e s o f % M en ti o n in g a n e v e n t re w e ig h te d to re fl ec t th e a g e d is tr ib u tio n in th e J ap a n es e
p o p u l at io n b a se d o n th e 1 9 9 0 c en s u s . S o u rc e : N ip p o n : A c h a r te d s u r ve y o f J a p a n , 1 9 9 4 , p u b l is h e d b y K o k u se i -sh a , T o k y o , 1 9 9 5 . T h e o ri g in a l a g e d at a co m e fro m th e B u re a u o f S t a tisti c s , M a n a g em e n t a n d C o o rd in a tio n A g en c y .
15
T h e n e x t th re e ev e n ts in o rd e r w o u l d b e E c o n o m ic P r o s p erit y , m e n t io n e d b y 2 .9 % , E n d o f th e
C o ld W a r (2 .6 % ), a n d th e S a l es T ax o f 1 9 8 9 (2 .5 % ). J a p an e s e in 1 9 9 1 m i g h t w e ll h a v e b e e n a s im p re ss e d w it h J a p a n ’ s p o s t- w a r e c o n o m ic p ro s p e rity a s w e re t h e G erm a n s w it h th e ir o w n , b u t th e J a p a n es e p ro p o rtio n i s si g n ifi c an tl y s m a ll e r (P < .0 1 ) a n d t h e re a l so s e e m s to b e le s s o f a s in g l e te rm li k e `` ec o n o m ic m i ra c le ’ ’ i n J ap a n to ch a ra c te ris e i ts re m a rk ab le ec o n o m ic d e v el o p m e n t. O n th e o t h e r h a n d , th e J ap a n es e e m p h a s is o n t h e 1 9 7 3 o il cri s is is n o t m a tc h e d i n th e G e rm a n s a m p le , w h e re o n ly 2 o u t o f t h e 7 2 8 re s p o n d e n t s m e n t io n e d t h a t e v e n t , e v e n th o u g h G erm a n s w e re a ls o g re a tly a ffe c te d b y t h e 1 9 7 3 A ra b b o y c o tt .
442
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
th e Y o ko h a m a p erc en tag e s to fit the c o un try -w id e ag e d istrib u tio n , th e 5 3% w h o m e n tio n W o rld W ar II is c on side rab ly h ig h e r th a n th e eq u iv ale nt p erc e nta ge in th e U n ite d S tate s in 1 9 8 5, w h ich w a s 2 9 % . Im p orta nt as the w a r w a s to A m er ic an s, c iv ilia ns w ere n ev er bo m be d , th e c o u ntry o cc u pie d, o r th e p o lity 16 tra nsf orm ed a fte r th e w a r. T h e a sso cia tio n s of a ge w ith m e ntion s o f W o rld W a r II, th e G u lf W a r, a n d th e 17 O il C risis a re sh o w n in F ig. 2 . T h e rela tio n o f W o rld W a r II m e n tio n s to a g e is pa rtic u larly strik in g : ap p ro x im ate ly 9 0 % of th o se in th eir 7 0 s m e n tio n th e w a r eithe r 1 st o r 2 nd in im p o rta nc e , w ith th e p e rc e n ta g e d e clin in g to less th a n 3 0 % am o ng th os e u n d er 4 0 y ea rs o f a ge . T h e re su lts in d ic a te th e c o n tin uin g sa lie nc e of W orld W ar II in th e c o lle ctive m e m orie s o f o ld e r Jap an e se , w h ile th e sh a rp d ec lin e in m e n tio n s o nc e p ast th e W o rld W a r II c o h o rts in d ic a te s th e dim in ish m e n t o f su ch co llec tiv e m em o rie s as n ew c o h orts re p la c e the rem na n ts of th e W orld W ar II g en e ration . T h e o the r tw o e ve n ts sh o w n in F ig . 2 also re v e al cle ar an d re a d ily in terp rete d ag e re la tio n s. T h e G u lf W a r, h a v ing ju st e nd e d , is giv en prim a rily by th e 18 yo u n g er p eo p le in th e sam p le , an d ra re ly by th o se o ve r 5 0 . Ind e e d, it is re p o rte d a lm o st a s fre q u en tly by th o se u n d er 45 (b orn after 1 9 45 ) a s is W o rld W a r II. It sh o uld b e em p h asised th a t th e ag e re la tio n s fo r the tw o w ars w e re ne ith e r c re a te d n or c o nstra ine d b y th e o rig in a l q ue stio n w o rdin g . T h e q u e stio n ne v er re fers to ``m e m o rie s’ ’ , bu t sim p ly to m e ntion in g im p ortan t e v en ts o r ch a ng e s, an d th us W o rld W a r II w a s c om p letely w ithin th e sco p e o f the q u e stio n re g a rdle ss o f a re sp on d en t’ s a g eÐ a s a va ila b le in p rin cip le to th o se a ge d 1 8 a s to th o se ag e d 80 . Y e t d esp ite th e o v e rw h e lm ing sig nifica n ce o f W o rld W ar II to Jap a n ’ s su b se qu e nt h isto ry , few e r th a n h a lf o f Ja p an e se u n d er 4 0 y e ars o f ag e m e n tio n it as a n e sp ec ia lly im po rta nt ev e n t. T h e th ird ev en t sh o w n in F ig . 2 is th e o nly o n e fro m T a b le 2 tha t is ne ith e r ea rly n o r rec e nt in tim e : th e 19 7 3 ``O il S h oc k ’ ’ . It rev e als a lm o st pre cise ly th e ag e relatio n w e w o u ld e x p ec t, b ase d o n th e assu m p tio n th a t an e ve n t ha s its la rge st im p a ct o n tho se w h o ex p er ie n ce it du ring th eir y o u th . T h e ``O il S h o ck ’ ’ is m en tion e d prim a rily b y th o se a ro un d 4 2 y e ars o f ag e , w h ic h im p lie s ag e 2 4 a t
16
S c o tt a n d Z a c (1 9 9 3 ) re p o rt th at 4 5 % o f B rit o n s m e n ti o n e d W o rld W a r II, a lt h o u g h th at s a m p le
a ls o h a s li m ita t io n s th a t m a k e g en e ra li sa tio n to t h e e n tire p o p u la ti o n a li ttle u n c e rta in . B rita i n w a s h e a v ily b o m b e d , b u t n o t to th e s a m e ex te n t as Ja p a n , a n d it f ac e d th e th re a t o f i n v a s io n b u t n o t th e a ct u a l ity , h en c e t h e B ri tish fig u re fa ll in g b et w e en th e J a p an e s e a n d A m e ric a n v a lu e s s e e m s p la u s ib le . H o w e v e r, al l o f t h e s e fig u re s n o d o u b t d e p e n d o n th e sa l ie n c e o f c o m p e ti n g e v e n ts , s u c h a s R e u n ifi ca t io n fo r G e rm a n s, s o c o m p a ris o n s a c ro s s c o u n trie s a re m o re u s e fu l w ith in a g e c a te g o rie s , a s w e d o a t a la te r p o i n t (F ig . 4 ), a n d e v en th e n m u st b e c o n s id e re d in th e c o n te x t o f o t h e r e v e n ts . 17
G r ap h s o f U n ifi c at io n a n d E n v iro n m e n t a re m u c h li k e th o s e fo r th e G u lf W a r, e x c e p t th a t th e
E n v i ro n m e n t a ls o s h o w s a w e a k c u rv il in ea rit y s im il ar to th e O il C r is is (d is c u ss e d la t er) . T h e re la ti o n o f a g e to m en ti o n s o f th e E m p e ro r i s p re s en te d in F ig . 3 . 18
A l th o u g h th e l o g is ti c re g re s si o n y ie ld s a s ig n ific a n t q u a d ra t ic t e rm (P < .0 3 ), it is s l ig h t a n d le s s
v i si b l e t h a n th e h i g h ly s i g n ifi ca n t (P < .0 0 0 1 ) a n d v e ry v i si b l e l in ea r t re n d .
443
FIG. 2.
W o rl d W a r II, th e G u l f W a r, a n d t h e O il C ris is , b y a g e fo r J a p an e s e .
444
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
th e tim e th e A ra b sta tes sud d e n ly a n d d ra stic a lly re du c ed th e flo w o f o il to th e W e st a n d Ja p an . Jap an is alm o st to tally de p en d e n t o n im po rts fo r o il, a n d th u s th e b oy c ott m a d e a lastin g im pre ssion o n m a n y Ja p an e se in th eir te e ns a n d tw e ntie s at th e tim e Ð m o re so th an on o lde r Jap a n ese Ð as re fle c te d in th e cu rv ilin ea r relatio n in Fig . 2 . F ig u re 3 p re sen ts th e o n e e v en t ab o ut w hic h w e w ere in itially u n c erta in : re sp o n ses co n c ern ing the Im p erial S yste m . T o th e e xte nt th a t th is is a tra ditio na l asp e ct o f Ja p an e se so c iety , o n e m ig ht h a ve e x pe c ted it to b e m e n tio n ed m os t often b y o lde r Ja pa n e se, the m ore so b e ca use th e ba se lin e da ta w e u se d in o u r qu e stio n re ferre d e x plicitly to th e b eg in nin g o f E m pe ro r H iro hi to ’ s reig n in 1 9 2 6. H ow e v er, th e late E m p e ror ’ s le ng th y te rm in al illn e ss in 1 9 88 a n d th e a sc en sio n to th e th ro n e o f E m p ero r A k ih ito too k p la c e le ss th a n tw o y ea rs p rio r to ou r su rve y a nd th us co n stitute d a v e ry re c en t ev e n t, 19 oc c urrin g in de e d in th e sa m e y ea r as the fall o f th e B e rlin W a ll. Fig u re 3 in d ic a tes th a t it w as rec en c y rath e r tha n trad itio n th a t le d to m o st o f th e m e m o ries re p o rte d b y the Y o k o h am a sam ple , for th e rela tio n is in ve rse ly a n d 20 sig n ific an tly rela ted to a g e. T h us the c h an g e s in the Im pe ria l S y stem h a d m o st im p ac t o n y o un g er Jap a n ese , m u ch as did rec e nt in tern a tio na l e ve n ts suc h as G erm an R e u n ific ation an d th e G u lf W ar. M o reo v er, e v en am o ng o ld e r re sp o n de n ts, no t a sin g le a nsw e r spe ak s o f th e 1 9 26 en th ron e m e n t o f H iro hito or o f the ea rly ye a rs o f h is re ig n ; m o st of th e re sp on se s re fer to E m pe ro r H iro hi to ’ s d e ath o r to th e tran sitio n fro m his era to th e n ew o n e (``the c h an g e fro m S ho w a to H eise i’ ’ w as a freq u en t resp o n se). T h e C o n te n t o f W o rld W a r II M en tio ns. A s w ou ld b e ex p ec ted , ag e w a s stro n g ly re late d to w h e the r m en tion s o f W o rld W ar II in c lud e d so m e re fere nc e to p erso n al or fam ily in v olv em e n t in the w a r, e .g . ``I w as in the bo m b in g a n d fa c e d d ea th d irec tly ’ ’ . Y o un g e r p e op le w h o re ferre d to th e w a r te n de d to spe a k in m o re g en e ral w ay s ab o ut its p o sitive ou tco m e s, suc h a s pe ac e , d em oc rac y , o r pro sp e rity .
19
E m p e ro r H i ro h it o su c c u m b e d o v e r a n e x te n d e d p e rio d o f ti m eÐ c o lla p s in g o n 1 9 S ep te m b e r,
1 9 8 8 , b u t n o t d y in g u n til 7 Ja n u ary , 1 9 8 9 Ð a n d th e m e d ia re p o rte d e v e ry d a y o n h is c o n d i tio n , p re s e n t in g m a n y m ed ic a l d e t ai ls th a t w o u l d n o t o rd in a ril y b e p u b l is h e d i n th e W e s t (F ie l d , 1 9 9 1 ). A cc o rd in g t o F ie l d ( 1 9 9 1 , p .i x ), th e p e rio d w a s ``liv e d w ith a p a rt ic u la r in te n s i ty b y m o s t J a p an e s e ’ ’ , a n d w ith m u c h co n ce rn th ro u g h o u t t h e n at io n o v e r h o w to a v o id o rd in a ry b u s in e s s a n d s o c i al a ct iv itie s t h a t m ig h t s e e m d is re s p e c t fu l. 20
T h e re is a h in t o f c u rv i li n e a ri ty , w it h an a p p a re n t p e ak o f m e n t io n s a m o n g th o s e 3 0 to 3 4 , b u t
th e tre n d d o e s n o t a p p r o a c h s t at is ti ca l si g n ifi ca n c e , is d i ffic u lt to i n t erp re t, a n d m u s t b e re g a rd e d a s in d i st in g u is h ab le in t h is s a m p le fro m c h a n c e v a ria tio n . H o w e v e r, w e s h o u ld n o te th a t t h e m o re lite ra l c o h o rt e ffe c t i n fe rre d fro m M a n n h e i m ’ s e m p h a s i s o n a d o l e sc e n c e a n d e a rly a d u l th o o d i s le s s a p p a re n t h e re, w i th th e p e a k m e n t io n s a l ittle o ld e r ( 3 0 ±3 4 ) th a n e x p e c te d , a l th o u g h t h e n u m b er o f c as e s o n w h ic h t h a t p o i n t is b a s e d i s q u ite s m a ll (n = 3 7 ).
445
FIG. 3.
M e n t io n s o f Im p e ria l S y s te m , b y a g e fo r J a p a n e s e . (B a s e N s a re s a m e as F i g . 2 .)
446
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
H iro sh im a a s a S ym b o l of th e W a r. A s n o te d ea rlie r, B u ru m a (1 9 9 4 ) cla im s th a t H iro shim a is ``th e su p re m e sy m bo l of the P ac ific W a r’ ’ fo r th e Jap a n ese . W e c o un te d the nu m be r o f m e n tio ns o f H iro s him a by an y on e in th e sam p le , in clu d in g th o se w ho d id n o t use the n am e o f the c ity (or o f N ag a sak i) bu t sim p ly refe rred to th e dro p pin g o f a n ato m ic b o m b . O n ly 2 0 resp o n de n ts re fe rre d in a ny w ay to H irosh im a, a nd th is in clu de s tw o som ew h a t am b ig u o u s ca se s. T hu s o n ly a b o ut 2 % of th e Y o k o h am a sa m p le m e n tio ne d th e d ro p pin g of an ato m ic bo m b o n Ja pa n , a n d the p e rce n ta g e rise s to o n ly 3.7 % w h e n w e lim it th e b a se to th e 5 2 9 resp o n d en ts w h o m e n tio ne d W o rld W a r II in a n y w a y at a ll. M u c h o f Jap a n (in clu d in g Y ok o h am a) w as v e ry h ea v ily b om b ed d u rin g W o rld W a r II, an d by 1 94 5 ``60 p erc en t of th e g rou n d are a o f th e c o un try ’ s six ty la rg e r citie s an d to w n s ha d b e en b u rn t ou t’ ’ (K e eg a n , 19 9 0 , p .5 7 7). T h u s it is n o t su rp rising th a t th e m a n y refe ren c es to su fferin g d urin g W o rld W a r II w o u ld b e ba se d on pe rso n al e x pe rie n c e o f b o m b in g in a pa rtic ula r loc a lity suc h a s Y o k o ha m a, n o t o n th e sy m b o lic sig n ific an c e of H iro sh im a . In th is ca se it is im p ortan t to d istin g uish b e tw e e n tho se w h o a tte m p t to rep rese n t pu b lic v iew s an d th e larg e r pu b lic th at is b e in g rep re se nte d. (It d id se em lik ely th a t re sp on d e nts w h o m e ntio ne d H iro sh im a w o u ld b e yo u n ge r Jap a n ese ; th o se w h o se v iew of th e w ar m us t b e ba sed in cre asin g ly o n va rio u s fo rm s o f co n tin u ing pu b lic em ph a sis, ra the r th an on p erso na l e x pe rien c e. H o w ev e r, th e sm a ll n u m b er o f resp o n de n ts w h o m e n tio n H iro sh im a a re n o t d istin c tiv e in ag e , u n lik e G e rm a ns w h o m e n tio n th e de stru c tio n of Je w s, n or in ed u ca tion o r ge n de r.) T h e L eg a cy o f D e fea t. In co d in g W o rld W ar II m e ntio ns, w e n o te d sp ec ific re fe ren c es to Ja p an h av ing b e en d efe ate d in th e w ar in 15 % o f th e resp o nse s. T h is is a m uc h h ig h er rate th a n fo r G e rm an s, w h ere m e n tio n s o f d efe at oc c ur in le ss th an 2 % o f W o rld W a r II resp o n se s. T h e Ja pa n e se±G erm a n d iffere n ce is hig h ly sig n ifica n t (P < .0 0 1 ). T h e relatio n of Jap an ese refe ren c es to d e fea t an d a ge is w e ak ly a nd n e arly sig n ific an tly (P = .0 6 ) cu rv ilin ea r: d e fea t is m en tio n ed m ore o fte n b y tho se 1 8 to 34 a nd also by tho se 55 an d ov e r. T h is c a n b e se e n as c o n sisten t w ith B u ru m a ’ s (1 9 9 4) su g g estio n tha t a re a listic ac c ou n t o f th e w a r, in c lu d in g its c au se s a n d ou tc om es, te n d s to b e lo ca te d am o ng th e v ery o ld a nd the v ery y o un g Ð th e o ld be c au se th ey w e re bo rn b e fo re th e h e ig h t o f c ha u v in istic p ro pa g an d a a nd th e yo u n g b e ca u se th ey w ere b o rn a fte r it h a d p a ssed . It is d ifficu lt to te st this ide a m o re de fin itiv e ly , b ut w h a t is e ve n c le a re r in ou r d a ta is the find in g th a t de fe at is re fe rre d to inc rea sing ly a s the e d u ca tio n o f resp o n de n ts rises (w ith ag e co n trolled ): 8 % , 8 % , 14 % , 1 5 % , 25 % , a nd 2 4 % , re sp ec tiv e ly, a s o n e m o v e s fro m th ose w ith o nly e lem en tary sch o ol ed u ca tio n to th o se w ho h a v e a co lle g e de g ree o r m o re y e ars o f sch o o lin g . (G erm an m en tion s o f de fea t are to o few to sho w rela tio n s to a ge o r ed u ca tio n .)
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES
447
CONCLUSIONS ABOUT GERMAN AND JAPANESE COLLECTIVE MEMORIES W h e re e x te rn al e v en ts o cc u rre d th at sh o uld h av e h ad sim ila r im p ac ts on G e rm a n an d Jap a n ese liv es, pre v io u s tab les a nd figu res su g g es t q u ite sim ila r e ffec ts in ter m s o f sa lie n t m e m o rie s o f w h a t w e re im p o rtan t n a tio n a l a n d w o rld h ap p en in g s ov e r th e p ast h a lf-c en tu ry . F ig u re 4 b rin gs to g eth e r tw o su ch e ve n ts for c lose r e x am in a tio n. E ac h co u n try fe lt th e e n orm ou s im pa c t o f W o rld W a r II, inc lud in g to w a rd s its en d th e c o nsta n t b o m b ing o f c itie s a n d th e a fte rm a th o f w id e sp rea d fea r an d su fferin g . F o rty -five y ea rs late r, e ac h c ou n try to o k th e ro le o f d ista n t o b serv e rs o f the G ulf W a r, p resse d to h elp th e U S e ffo rt b u t n o t b ec o m in g d irec tly in vo lve d a s co m ba tan ts. F igu re 4 sho w s q u ite sim ila r m e m o ry cu rv es b y a ge fo r th es e tw o e v en ts in th e tw o co u ntrie s, w ith W o rld W a r II m e n tio n ed e sp ec ially b y old e r p eo p le a n d the G u lf W a r b y th o se in th e ir yo u th . M e n tio n s o f W orld W a r II d ispla y a n in te re sting n o n-lin e a r stru ctu re, alth ou g h m o re cle arly fo r Jap a ne se th an for G e rm an s (w he re th e p erc en ta ge s are less re lia b le b ec a use o f sm a ller b ase N s). T h e g rap h c an b e se en a s h av ing tw o m a in pla te a us, join ed b y a stee p in c lin e in th e m id -ag e ran g e an d w ith a d ip fo r the o ld e st m e m b e rs of th e sam ple . T h e w a r h ad e nd e d so m e 4 5 ye a rs ea rlie r an d the lo w p la tea u fo r yo u n g er p eo p le c on sists esse n tia lly of a ll th o se w h o w ere b orn a fte r 1 9 4 5 or w e re v e ry yo u n g ch ild re n a t th at tim e Ð th u s the y d id n o t h av e d ire ct e xp e rie n ce o f th e w a r itse lf a nd in m o st c a ses fail to m en tio n it a s esp e cia lly im p o rta n t. A ste ep rise th e n o cc u rs a s co h o rts are inc lud e d tha t p ro g ress ed th ro u g h ch ild h o o d an d e arly ad o le sc en c e du ring th e w a r y ea rs. N e x t, the hig h pla te a u fo r old er p e op le c o nsists o f re sp on d en ts w ho w e re a ll y ou n g ad u lts d urin g W o rld W a r II. F in ally, th e dip fo r tho se 8 0 a n d o ve r fits th e M an n h eim hy p o th e sis th a t th e se old e st pe o ple , w h o w e re a lre ad y b e yo n d th eir late 2 0 s w he n W o rld W ar II sta rte d in 19 39 , sh o uld b e a little le ss affe cte d b y th e w ar ex p erien c e; ho w e v er, th e n u m b e r in th is o ld e st a ge c a te g ory (N = 4 1 ) is sm a ll a n d th ey m a y also pre se n t sp ec ial p rob lem s o f m em o ry lo ss. T o the e x te n t th a t th ere is an y thin g furth er to ex p la in ab o u t c o un try d iffe re n ce s in F ig. 4 , it h as to d o m ain ly w ith th e so m e w h at hig h er pe rc en tag e s o f W o rld W ar II m e m o ries fo r o ld e r Jap a n ese tha n for o lde r G erm a ns, alth ou g h the le ve ls a re m uc h th e sam e fo r y o u th in th e tw o c o un trie s. It is lik ely th at th e low e r pe rc en tag e by o lde r G erm an s is du e to th e c o m p e tin g sa lie n c e o f m e m o ries o f th e re ce nt reu n ific a tio n. T h e lo gic o f o ur q ue stio n , w h ic h ca lle d fo r m e n tio n in g tw o im p o rta nt ev e nts, d id no t m ak e W o rld W a r II a nd D iv isio n o r R eu n ific ation m u tua lly e x clu siv e, b ut th e y m a y h av e ten d ed to b e m utu a lly ex c lu siv e in th e m e m o ries o f G e rm an resp o n de n ts. O f c o urse , e ve n w he re le ve ls o f m en tio n s o f th e sa m e ev e n t a re q u ite sim ila r b y G e rm a n s a n d J ap a n e se , th is d o e s n o t n e c e s sa rily p o in t to id e n tic a l m o tiv a tio n s. In th e c ase o f th e G ulf W ar, a lth ou g h o b je c tio ns to w ar as suc h w as the m o st fre qu e n t re aso n g iv en in b o th co u ntrie s, G erm a n s m o re o fte n
448
FIG. 4.
W o rl d W ar II a n d G u l f W a r m e n t io n s b y G e rm an s a n d Ja p a n e s e , b y a g e. (B a s e N s a re s a m e a s F i g . 1 fo r G er m a n s an d F ig . 2 fo r J a p a n e s e .)
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES
449
ex p resse d p o ssible an x iety a bo u t th e e n la rge m en t o f the w a r to in clu d e G erm an y (28 % ), p e rha p s fitting th e ir c lose r p rox im ity to th e G ulf, as a g ain st the p a ra lle l resp o n se (7 % ) fo r Jap a n ese . O n th e o the r h an d , Ja p an e se m ore o fte n c ite d th e p ossib le e ffec ts o f th e G u lf W ar o n o il p rice s (1 2 % ) th an d id G er m a ns (4 % ), co n sisten t w ith th e m o re fre q ue n t Ja pa n e se m e n tio n s o f th e 1 97 3 o il c risis. It is also inte restin g to n o te th at five G e rm a n s lik e ne d Iraq ’ s H u ssein to H itler; n o Jap a n ese d re w a ny sim ila r p ara lle l. O ur d a ta o n the re aso n s p eo p le g iv e fo r m en tio n in g a n e ve n t are also v alu a ble in p oin tin g u p th e rela tio n to tim e o f th e distin ctio n be tw e e n e piso d ic an d sem an tic m e m o rie s. W o rld W ar II d iffers fro m m o st la te r e ve n ts in th e hig h d eg ree to w hic h m em or ie s co n ce rnin g it are a u to b iog ra p hic al ra the r th a n a m a tte r o f a bstra ct lea rn ing a b o ut th e p ast. Su c h p erso n ally e xp e rie n ce d e arly ev e n ts ca n e m e rge fro m m e m o ry w ith little o r n o he lp from e x te rn al stim u li, w he rea s m a ny re ce n t ev e nts like th e G u lf W a r a re like ly to b e rem e m b ere d m a inly b e ca u se of th e ir salien c e in th e m e d ia . T h is su g ge sts th e hy p o the sis tha t rec en t e ve n ts th a t are n ot d ire c tly e xp e rie n tia l w ill sho w le ss sh arp c oh o rt e ffe cts tha n e arlier e v en ts, b ec au se th e ne a rly u n ive rsa l ex p o su re to th e m a ss m ed ia w ill b e th e p rim a ry c au sa l fa cto r, n o t th e ea rlie r de ep e r en c od in g th a t is c on n ec te d to the self (C on w a y, 19 9 7 ). F igu re 4 p ro vid es som e p relim in a ry e v id e nc e : fo r G erm an s th e ab so lu te v a lu e o f th e line a r slo p e fo r W o rld W ar II is m o re tha n tw ic e as g rea t a s tha t for th e G ulf W a r, an d fo r Jap a n ese the ra tio is m o re tha n thre e to o n e. T h u s, d istin ct co h o rt e ffe c ts a re g rea ter fo r th e e arlie r tha n fo r th e m o re re c en t ev en t. W e a re n o t sug g e stin g th at rec en t ev e nts ca n n ot be ev e ry b it a s p erso n a lly m e an in g ful a nd th ere fore a s lik e ly to y ie ld au tob io g ra p hic a l m em o rie s a s ea rlie r ev e n ts. In 1 94 5 , W o rld W ar II, th e n a ``re ce n t’ ’ e v en t, w o u ld do u b tle ss h av e p ro d u c ed m an y e p isod ic m e m o ries. W ha t w e a re sug g e stin g is th at fo r e ve n ts n ot p e rso n a lly im p o rta n t in a n au tob io g ra p h ic a l se n se , rec e nc y w ill ten d to be a n ec essa ry fa cto r in h av in g the m b rou g h t to m in d in resp o n se to a g en e ra l in q uiry lik e o ur E v en ts q ue stio n s. It is strik in g th a t ev e n a n e ve n t as ``o b jec tiv ely ’ ’ sign ific a nt a s W orld W a r II w as m en tio ne d as e spe c ia lly im p o rta n t b y on ly ab o u t a q u arter o f y o u th fro m th e tw o c ou n trie s. W h en w e tu rn to e ve n ts le ss fre q ue n tly m e n tio n ed tha n W o rld W ar II an d th e G ulf W a r, th ere a re tw o c o ho rt e ffe cts th at a re o f p artic u la r the o retica l im p orta nc e b e ca u se o f th eir c u rv ilin e arity: T h e E uro p e an C o m m u nity fo r G erm an s (see F ig . 1 ) a n d th e 1 97 3 oil c risis fo r Ja pa n e se (see Fig . 2 ). T h e rela tiv e ly lo w m e n tio n of th ese e ve n ts b y v ery yo u n g pe o ple (e.g . Jap an e se u nd e r a g e 30 in 19 9 1 ) c an re a dily b e a ttrib u te d to th e fa ct th a t th e y w e re to o y ou n g to h av e b e en aw a re of suc h e v en ts w h e n th e y o cc u rred . H ow e v er, lac k o f m e n tio n b y o ld er p eo p le (e .g . Ja p an e se a g e 6 0 a nd a b ov e in 1 9 91 , alth ou g h n ea rly 2 0 y e ar s y o u ng e r in 1 9 73 ) ca n n ot b e e x p la in e d by th eir un a w are n ess o f the ev e nt a t th e tim e it o cc u rre d . T h u s the se re su lts pro v ide furth er e vid en c e fo r the u niq u e im po rtan c e of a d ole sce n ce a n d ea rly a d ultho o d a s a p e rio d d urin g
450
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
w h ich c ollec tive m e m o ries o f p ub lic e ve n ts ten d to be im p rin ted . A t th e sa m e tim e , w e n e ed to e x te n d th e critic al ag e ra ng e fo r c o lle ctiv e m e m o rie s in bo th dire ction s: to in clu d e la te r c h ild h oo d fo r ev e nts tha t are sim p le an d d ra m a tic, suc h a s th e b u ild ing o f the B e rlin W a ll, an d to in c lu d e th e late tw e n tie s o r ev e n ea rly th irtie s fo r e v en ts tha t a re m o re a bstra ct a nd c om p le x . T h ere are a lso sev e ral sm a ll b ut ap p are ntly re lia b le differe n ce s be tw e e n o u r G e rm an an d Jap a ne se re su lts th a t a re intrig uin g b e ca u se th ey sug g es t su b tle va ria tio ns in th e w a y the tw o c o un tries ex p er ie n ce d w h at w a s bro ad ly th e sa m e ev e nt. T h ese b etw e en -c ou n try diffe ren ce s ra ise a ga in the issu e d isc u sse d at th e be g inn in g o f this artic le: th e rela tio n b etw e en ``c o lle ctiv e m em o ry’ ’ , a s pro m u lg a te d b y in tere sted e lite s a nd o rg an isa tio n s, a n d th e c ollec tiv e m e m o rie s of o rd in a ry in div id ua ls. F irst, w e n ote d th e h igh e r pro p ortion o f m en tion s o f a n ``e co n o m ic m ira cle ’ ’ or its e qu iv ale nt by G e rm a n s tha n b y Jap a n ese , ev e n th o u gh bo th co u n tries re c o ve red in a relativ ely sh o rt tim e from W o rld W ar II d e va statio n to b ec om e m a jo r ec o n om ic po w e rs o n th e w o rld sce n e . O u r te nta tiv e e x p la n atio n is th at th e G e rm an ec o no m ic d e ve lo p m e nt, b e gin nin g w ith the 1 9 4 8 c urre n cy re fo rm , w a s m o re ra pid a nd d ram atic, a t le a st p artly d u e to th e b en efits th a t flo w e d fro m th e M a rsh all P la n , a n d th a t th is w a s e spe c ially tru e in te rm s o f the im p a ct o f de v elo p m e n t o n pe r ca p ita c o n sum p tio n , w h ic h re m ain ed m u c h lo w e r in po st21 w a r Ja p an th a n in W est G e rm an y . In ad d ition , this m a y also b e a ca se w he re a co lle c tiv e m e m o ry em b ed d ed in th e la n g u ag e in the fo rm o f th e term ``e co n o m ic m irac le’ ’ (W irtsch a ftsw u n de r’ ’ ) h a s c o n tin u ed to m a k e th e ea rly e co n o m ic re c o ve ry m o re a cc essib le to in d iv id ua l G e rm an m e m o ries in la te r ye a rs a n d th u s affe cte d resp o n se s to o u r E v en ts qu e stio n s (c f. S ch u d so n, 1 9 9 2), w ith e ve n th e in tern a l allitera tio n o f th e G e rm a n te rm a n aid to its u se an d m e m o ry (cf. R u b in , 19 9 5 ). S e c on d , th e Jap a n ese w ere m u c h m o re lik ely th a n th e G erm an s to m e n tio n th e 1 9 7 3 oil c risis, alth ou g h b o th c o u ntries relied h e av ily o n im p orted o il a t tha t po in t in tim e. H ow e v er, ``o f a ll the in du stria l co u n trie s, [Ja pa n ] w as th e o n e m o st d ep e nd e n t on o il a s a sou rc e o f to ta l en e rg y ’ ’ (Y erg in , 1 99 1 , p.6 28 ), a n d th e re w ere re alistic d iffe ren c e s in th e de g re e to w h ich the tw o c o un tries w e re be in g h arm ed b y the em b arg o a n d th e sh arp esc a la tio n in oil price s. In a d dition , ord in ary Ja p an e se m a y h av e b ee n a ffec ted b y th is ev id en t fu lfilm e n t o f ea rlie r elite p ro no u n c em en ts a bo u t th eir c o un try’ s la c k of n atu ra l re sou rc es an d its 21
O n J a p a n ’ s l ag in p e r c ap it a l c o n s u m p tio n , a s c o m p a re d t o i ts m o r e r ap id p ac e i n p e r c a p i ta
g ro s s d o m e s ti c p ro d u ct (G D P ), s e e D e n is o n an d C h u n g (1 9 7 6 ). O n th e e ffe c t o f th e M a rs h a l l P la n , se e t h e c o m m e n t b y W es t G e rm a n y ’ s fo rm er C h a n c e l lo r, H e l m u t S c h m id t (1 9 9 7 ). U n fo rtu n at e ly it h a s p ro v e n d iffi cu lt to l o c a t e m o re d i re c t e v id e n c e b a se d o n a cl o s e c o m p ari s o n o f G e rm a n a n d Ja p a n e s e p o s t- w a r e c o n o m ic d e v e l o p m e n t. T h e re a re m a n y s e p a ra t e st u d ie s o f e a c h c o u n t ry b y e co n o m ic h i st o ri a n s , b u t ap p a re n tly n o c lo s e c o m p a ris o n o f th e tw o . W e s h o u ld a c k n o w le d g e th a t o n th is p o i n t , a s w e ll a s o n th e tw o p o in ts t h a t fo llo w , o u r in te rp re ta ti o n s re m a in m o re s p e c u la ti v e th a n w e w o u ld p re fe r.
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES
451
ex trem e vu lne rab ility to a n y c u t-o ff o f im p o rtsÐ th e p ro no u n ce m en ts cre atin g a k in d o f p erm an e n t co lle c tiv e m e m o ry w aitin g to b e ac tua ted . In de ed , the p a nic in Ja pa n resu ltin g fro m th e o il c risis sp re a d to a v arie ty o f oth er p rod u c ts, lea din g to w ide sp rea d h oa rd in g a nd to sh o rta g e s n o t dire ctly re lated to oil (T su c h iy a , 1 98 6 ; Y e rg in, 1 9 9 1, p .6 1 6). T h ird , Ja p an e se re fer to th e d e fea t o f th e ir co u n try in W o rld W a r II m o re o fte n tha n G e rm a n s re fer to th eir de fe at. It is d ifficu lt from a W este rn stan d p o in t to se e th e co m p le te loss of th e w a r by th e tw o co u n trie s to h av e b ee n ve ry d iffe re n t, a lth o ug h G e rm a ny ’ s situa tio n w as no t a s u niq ue , a s it h ad b ee n d efe ate d in W o rld W ar I just a q ua rte r o f a c en tu ry e a rlier. B u t the m ore fre q u en t m e n tio n s o f d efe a t b y Jap a n ese m ay be a n e xa m p le o f h o w th e fo rm a l p u b lic ex p ressio n o f a co lle c tiv e m e m o ry th ro ug h so cieta l co m m e m o ration h e lp s sh ap e ind ivid u a l m e m o ries (c f. S c h w artz , 19 9 7 ). 1 5 A u gu st, the da y Jap an su rren d ere d in 1 9 4 5, is ce leb ra ted a nn u ally as a w a y of h o n ou rin g th o se Jap a n ese k illed in the w a r a n d it h as b e co m e k no w n in som e q u arters in Jap a n a s th e ``A n niv e rsa ry o f D efe at’ ’ . N o th ing e q u iva len t o cc u rs in G erm an y e ith e r o n a n a nn u al b a sis o r w ith th a t re fere n ce . F in a lly , w h e n w e turn a g ain to c o nsid er m e m o ries of cru c ia l h ap p en in g s w ith in th e W orld W a r II p e riod , th e lim itation s o f an e lite-sp o n so re d co llec tiv e m e m o ry in the fa ce o f p o w e rfu l au to bio g ra p hic a l m e m o ries b e co m e cle ar fo r b oth co u n trie s, alb eit for tw o q u ite differe n t e v en ts. T o th e n aiv e o u tsid e o bse rv er, e sp ec ially so m e o n e w ho thin k s o f co lle c tiv e m em ory in te rm s o f im p orta nt po litic a l sym b o ls, th ere m igh t w e ll b e th e a n tic ipa tio n o f he a rin g freq u en tly the w o rd ``H o loc a ust’ ’ o r its eq u iva len t m en tion e d b y G e rm a n s, an d ``H iro sh im a’ ’ o r its eq u iva le nt b y Jap a n ese . Y et th ere are fe w su ch m en tion s in the tw o sam p le s: o n ly 7 o u t o f 7 2 8 G e rm a n s re fer in an y w ay to Jew s a nd on ly 2 0 o ut o f 8 4 3 Ja pa n ese re fer to H iros him a, N ag a sak i, or th e a to m ic b o m b . A t th e sam e tim e, in e ac h co u n try larg e n um be rs d o ta lk ab o ut W orld W a r II an d esp e cia lly ab o u t th e ne g ativ e c on se q ue n ce s it h a d fo r th e m se lve s a nd th eir fam ilie s. If w e ha d on ly th e G e rm a n re su lt, w e m ig ht b e tem pte d to sp ec u la te o n h ow d iffic u lt it is to re po rt m em orie s tha t ch a rac terise on e ’ s n atio n a s v ictim iser. H ow e v e r, o ur Ja p an e se sam ple se ld o m m e ntion e d H irosh im a , d e spite th e fac t tha t th e term ide n tifies th em a s v ic tim s, no t as vic tim ise rs. W h en w e ta k e th e tw o fin d in g s to g eth e rÐ th e pa u city o f re fere nc e s e ith e r to th e H olo ca u st o r to H iro sh im a Ð w e c a n co n n ec t b o th resu lts to a p erv a siv e fin din g o f c ro ss-s ec tio n su rv e y s a ro un d th e w o rld : ord ina ry in div id ua ls (``the g e n era l p u blic’ ’ ) are u sua lly m u c h m ore co n ce rn ed w ith th e im p a ct of ev e n ts o n th eir ow n pe rso na l liv e s th an th e y are w ith the ev e nts an d sy m bo ls th at oc c up y m uc h of th e 22 atten tion o f in telle ctu als, p o litic a l le ad e rs , an d a ca d em ic inv e stig ato rs. 22
In th e lo n g ru n , el ite -s p o n s o re d c o lle c ti v e m e m o rie s m ay n e v er th e l e ss w i n o u t , o n ce th e
g e n e ra tio n s h a v in g e v e n d i st a n t c o n n e ct io n to W o rld W a r II h a v e d is a p p e a re d c o m p l e te ly , th o u g h b y th a t p o i n t n o n e o f t h e m e m o rie s m a y c ar ry m u ch m e a n i n g fo r o rd in ar y p eo p le .
452
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
REFERENCES A n d re w s, F .M ., M o rg a n , N .J., S o n q u is t, J .A ., & K le m , L . (1 9 7 3 ). M u ltip l e c la s s ific a ti o n a n a ly s is . A n n A rb o r: In st itu te fo r S o ci a l R e s e arc h . B e n e d ic t, R . (1 9 4 6 ). T h e ch r y s a n th e m u m a n d t h e sw o r d : P a t te r n s o f J a p a n es e c u l tu r e. N ew Y o rk : H o u g h to n M iffli n . B ro w n in g , C . (1 9 9 2 ). O r d in a r y m e n : R e se r v e p o li ce b a t ta lio n 1 0 1 a n d th e f in a l so lu ti o n in P o la n d . N e w Y o rk : H a rp e rC o l lin s. B u ru m a , I. (1 9 9 4 ). T h e w a g e s o f g u i lt: M e m o ri es o f w a r i n G e r m a n y a n d J a p a n . N e w Y o r k : F a rra r S tra u s G i ro u x . C o n w a y , M .A . (1 9 9 0 ). A u to b io g r a p h i c a l m em o r y : A n in tr o d u c ti o n . M i lto n K ey n e s, U K : O p e n U n iv e rs ity P re s s . C o n w a y , M .A . (1 9 9 7 ). T h e in v e n to ry o f e x p e ri e n c e: m e m o r y a n d i d e n tif y . In J .W . P e n n eb a k er, D . P a e z, & B . R im e (E d s .) C o ll e ct ive m e m o r y o f p o litic a l e v e n t s: S o c ia l p s y c h o lo g i ca l p e r s p e c ti ve s ( p p .2 1 ±4 5 ). H il ls d a l e, N J : E rlb a u m . D an ig e lis, N .L ., & C u tl e r, S .J. (1 9 9 1 ). C o h o rt tre n d s i n a t titu d e s a b o u t la w a n d o rd e r: W h o ’ s l e a d i n g th e c o n s e rv a tiv e w a v e ? P u b li c O p in io n Q u a r te r ly , 5 5 , 2 4 ±2 9 . D av is , J .A . (1 9 9 2 ). C h a n g e a b l e w e a th e r in a c o o li n g c lim a te a to p th e lib e ra l p la te a u : C o n v e rs io n a n d re p la c e m en t in fo rt y -t w o g e n e ra l so c ia l s u r v e y it e m s, 1 9 7 2 ±1 9 8 9 . P u b li c O p in io n Q u a r te r ly, 5 6 , 2 6 1 ±3 0 6 . D en is o n , E .F ., & C h u n g , W .K . (1 9 7 6 ).
E c o n o m i c g ro w th a n d its so u rce s . In H . P a tric k a n d H .
R o s o v s k y (E d s ) A s ia ’ s n ew g ia n t: H o w t h e J a p a n es e e c o n o m y w o rk s (p p .6 3 ±1 5 1 ). W a sh in g to n D C : B ro o k in g s In st itu te . F ie l d , N . (1 9 9 1 ). In th e r ea lm o f a d y i n g E m p e r o r: A p o r tr a it o f J a p a n a t c e n t u r y ’ s e n d . N e w Y o rk : P antheo n B o ok s. F it z g e ra ld , J .M . (1 9 8 8 ). V i v i d m e m o rie s an d th e re m in is c en c e p h e n o m e n o n : T h e ro l e o f a s el f n a rra ti v e . H u m a n D e v e lo p m e n t, 3 1 , 2 6 1 ±2 7 3 . H al b w a c h s, M . (1 9 5 0 /1 9 8 0 ). T h e c o l le c ti ve m e m o r y . N e w Y o rk : H a rp e r. H ei n ri c h , H .A . (1 9 9 6 ). Z e it h i s to r is c h e E re ig n is s e a l s K ris t a llisa tio n sp u n k te v o n G e rer at io n e n . R ep li k a t io n e in es M es s in s tru m e n te s . Z u m a -N a c h ric h te n , 3 9 . Ja p a n S ta ti st ic a l A ss o c ia ti o n (1 9 9 7 ). 1 9 9 8 J a p a n S ta ti st ic a l Y e a rb o o k . J a p a n : A u t h o r. Je n n in g s , M .K . (1 9 9 6 ). P o li tic a l k n o w l e d g e a c ro ss tim e a n d g e n e ra t io n s . P u b l ic O p in io n Q u a r te r ly, 6 0 , 2 2 8 ±2 5 2 . K ee g a n , J. (1 9 9 0 ). T h e S ec o n d W o r ld W a r . N e w Y o rk : V ik in g . K o o n z , C . (1 9 9 4 ). B et w e en m e m o ry a n d o b li v i o n : C o n c e n trat io n c a m p s i n G e rm a n m e m o ry . In J .R . G i llis (E d .) C o m m e m o r a ti o n s : T h e p o litic s o f n a t io n a l i d e n tity (p p .2 5 8 ±2 8 0 ). P ri n c e to n , N J : P rin c e to n U n i v e rs it y P re s s . K ro s n ic k , J .A ., & A l w in , D .F . (1 9 8 9 ). A g i n g a n d s u s c e p t ib ility to a tt itu d e c h a n g e . J o u r n a l o f P e r so n a l ity a n d S o c ia l P s y c h o lo g y , 5 7 , 4 1 6 ±4 2 5 . M a n n h e im , K . (1 9 2 8 /1 9 5 2 ). T h e p ro b l em o f g en e ra ti o n s . In K . M a n n h e im , E s s a y s o n th e s o c io lo g y o f kn o w le d g e (p p .2 7 6 ±3 2 2 ). L o n d o n : R o u t le d g e & K e g a n P a u l. M il le r, J . (1 9 9 0 ). O n e b y o n e b y o n e : F a c in g t h e H o lo ca u st . N e w Y o rk : S im o n & S ch u st e r. M it s ch e rli ch , A ., & M it sc h e rlic h , M . ( 1 9 7 5 ). T h e in a b il ity t o m o u rn : P ri n c i p l es o f c o ll e c tiv e b e h a v io r . N e w Y o rk : G ro v e P re s s. P e n n e b ak e r, J .W ., &
B a n as i k , B .L . (1 9 9 7 ). O n th e c re a ti o n a n d
m a in te n a n c e o f c o l le c ti v e
m e m o rie s . In J.W . P e n n e b a k e r, D . P ae z , & B . R im e ( E d s.), C o lle c ti v e m e m o r y o f p o litic a l e v e n ts : S o c ia l p s y c h o lo g ic a l p e r sp e c tiv e s (p p .3 ±1 9 ). H illsd a le , N J : E rl b a u m . R o b e rts , C .W ., & L an g , K . (1 9 8 5 ). G en e ra ti o n s an d id e o l o g ic a l c h an g e : S o m e o b s er v a ti o n s . P u b l ic O p in io n Q u a r te r ly , 4 9 , 4 6 0 ±4 7 3 . R u b in , D .C . (1 9 9 5 ). M e m o ry in o r a l tr a d it io n : T h e c o g n i ti ve p s y ch o lo g y o f e p i c , b a ll a d s , a n d c o u n t in g -o u t r h y m es . N e w Y o rk : O x fo rd U n iv e rs ity P re s s .
COLLECTIVE MEMORIES R u b in , D .C ., R a h h a l, T .A ., &
P o o n , L .W . (1 9 9 8 ). T h i n g s l e a rn e d
in e a rl y
453
a d u lth o o d
a re
re m em b e re d b e st . M em o r y a n d C o g n it io n , 2 6 , 3 ±1 9 . R u b i n , D .C ., W e tz le r, S .E ., & N e b e s , R .D . (1 9 8 6 ). A u t o b io g r ap h ic a l m e m o ry ac ro s s th e life s p a n . In D .C . R u b in (E d .), A u to b i o g ra p h ic a l m e m o ry ( p p .2 0 2 ±2 2 1 ). C a m b rid g e : C a m b ri d g e U n i v e rs it y P re s s . S c h m id t, H . (1 9 9 7 ). M il es to g o : F ro m A m e ric a n p l a n to E u ro p e a n U n i o n . F o r ei g n A f fa ir s, 7 6 , 2 1 3 ± 22 1. S c h u d s o n , M . (1 9 9 2 ). W a t e rg a te i n A m er i ca n m e m o r y : H o w w e r e m em b e r , f o r g e t, a n d re c o n s t ru c t th e p a st . N e w Y o rk : B a s ic B o o k s. S c h u m a n , H .R ., B el li , F ., & B is c h o p in g , K . (1 9 9 7 ). T h e g e n er at io n a l b a si s o f h is to ric a l k n o w le d g e . In J .W . P e n n e b a k e r, D . P a e z , & B . R i m e (E d s.), C o lle c ti v e m e m o r y o f p o litic a l e v e n ts : S o c ia l p s y c h o lo g ic a l p e r sp e c tiv e s (p p .4 7 ±7 7 ). H il ls d a l e , N J : E rlb a u m . S c h u m a n , H ., & C o rn in g , A . (1 9 9 7 ). C o lle c ti v e k n o w le d g e in R u s si a : F r o m t h e G r e a t P u r g e to g l a s n o s t. P ap e r p re s e n te d a t th e A m e ri c an A s s o c ia tio n fo r P u b l ic o p in io n R e se a rc h , N o rfo lk , V irg in ia , M a y . S c h u m a n , H ., &
R ie g e r, C . (1 9 9 6 ) . A n
exp erim ent on
a sking
a b o u t c o l le c t i v e
m e m o ri e s .
U n p u b li sh e d m e m o . A n n A rb o r: In st itu te fo r S o c ia l R e s ea rc h . S c h u m a n , H ., & S c o tt, J . (1 9 8 9 ). G e n e ra tio n s a n d c o ll ec t iv e m e m o rie s . A m er i ca n S o c io lo g ic a l R e v i ew , 5 4 , 3 5 9 ±3 8 1 . S c h w art z , B . (1 9 8 2 ). T h e so c ia l c o n te x t o f c o m m e m o ra tio n : A s t u d y o f c o l le c ti v e m e m o ry . S o c ia l F o rc e s , 6 1 , 3 7 4 ±4 0 2 . S c h w art z , B . (1 9 9 7 ). C o lle c tiv e m e m o ry a n d h is to ry : W h y A b ra h a m L i n c o ln b e c a m e a s y m b o l o f ra c ia l e q u a li ty . S o c io lo g ic a l Q u a r te r ly , 3 8 , 4 6 9 ±4 9 6 . S c o tt, J ., & Z a c , L . (1 9 9 3 ). C o lle c tiv e m e m o ries in B rit ai n a n d th e U n ite d S ta t e s. P u b lic O p in io n Q u a r te r ly, 5 7 , 3 1 5 ±3 3 1 . T s u c h iy a , K . (1 9 8 6 ). M id d l e E a s te rn o il a n d th e J a p an e s e e c o n o m y . In H . H a x , W . K ra u s, & K . T s u c h iy a (E d s .), S tr u c tu ra l c h a n g e : T h e c h a ll e n g e t o in d u s tr ia l so c ie t ie s (p p .2 9 ±4 1 ). B e rl in : S p rin g e r-V erl a g . T u lv in g , E . (1 9 7 2 ) . E p is o d ic a n d s em a n ti c m e m o ry . In E . T u lv in g & W . D o n al d s o n (E d s.), O rg a n i za t io n o f m e m o ry (p p .3 8 1 ±4 0 3 ). N e w Y o rk : A c a d e m i c P re s s. T u lv in g , E . (1 9 8 3 ). E le m e n ts o f e p is o d i c m e m o ry . N e w Y o rk : O x fo rd U n iv e rs ity P re s s . T y le r, T .R ., & S c h u lle r, R .A . (1 9 9 1 ). A g i n g a n d a tt itu d e ch a n g e . Jo u rn a l o f P er s o n a li ty a n d S o c ia l P s y c h o lo g y , 6 1 , 6 8 9 ±6 9 7 . U n i te d N a ti o n s (1 9 9 5 ) . U n ite d N a t io n s s ta tisti c a l y e a r b o o k , fo r tie t h is s u e. N ew Y o rk : A u th o r . W e i d e n fe ld , W ., & L u t z , F .P . ( 1 9 9 4 ). T h e d iv id e d n a tio n : H i s to ric a l c o n s c io u s n es s in p o s tu n ifi c at io n G e rm a n y . G e rm a n P o li tic s a n d S o c ie ty , 3 3 , 1 1 7 ±1 4 5 . Y e rg i n , D . (1 9 9 1 ). T h e p r i ze : T h e e p i c q u es t f o r o il , m o n e y, a n d p o w e r. N e w Y o r k : S im o n & S c h u s te r.
APPENDIX German Question Wording: In d e n le tze n 50 Ja hr en , a lso se it e tw a 1 94 0 , h a t es e in e R e ih e n a tio na ler u n d intg ern a tio n ale r V e raÈ n d eru n ge n ge g eb e n . K oÈ nn ten S ie m ir b itte ein o d er z w e i d ie ser E re ign isse o d e r V eraÈ n de ru n ge n n e nn e n , die Ih n en be so n d ers w ic h tig e rsc h ien e n sin d . A u f d ie se F ra g e g ib t e s k e in e r ic h tig e n o d e r f alsc h e n A ntw o rte n , e s ge h t u n s g an z be so nd e rs da ru m , z u erfa hre n , w elc h e w ich tig e n n ation a len o de r in tern a tio n ale n E reig n isse Ih ne n in d en S inn k o m m en . W a s m a ch t d as E re ign is b eso n d ers w ich tig fuÈ r Sie ?
454
SCHUMAN, AKIYAMA, KNAUPER
G a b e s in d iese r Z eit irg e nd e in a n de re s n ation a les od e r in tern a tio n ales E re ign is od e r ein e V e raÈ n d eru n g, d ie fuÈ r S ie b e son d e rs w ic htig w a r? U n d w as m ac h t d iese s E re ig nis b eso n d ers w ic h tig fuÈ r S ie ?
Japanese Question Wording:
M E M O R Y , 1 9 9 8 , 6 (4 ), 4 5 5 ±4 6 5
F o r w a r d T e le sc o p in g : T h e Q u e s tio n M a tte r s V in c e n t P ro h a sk a L e hm a n C o lleg e , T h e C ity U niv er sity o f N e w Y ork , U S A
N o rm a n R . B ro w n U niv ersity o f A lb erta , C an a d a
R o b e rt F . B e lli U n ive rsity o f M ic h ig a n , U S A
F o rw a rd tele sc op ing , th e r ep o rtin g or da tin g o f e v e nts a s b e in g m or e re c en t th an th e y a c tu a lly w e re , is o fte n o b se rv e d in s u rv ey s a n d p ro d u ce s in ac c ur a te d ata . W e be lie v e th a t s om e fo rw a rd tele sc o ping o c cu r s w h e n th e q ue st io n fo r m a t a llo w s pe o ple to re s p o n d w ith ou t ex ten si v e r etrie va l o f te m p o ra l inf o rm a tio n co n ce r ning th e ta rg e t e v e nts. W e c o lle c te d tw o typ e s o f da ta . T he f irst , th e typ e u su ally co lle c te d b y su rv e y r es ea r ch e rs , in v olv ed v isits to m e dic al do c to rs . A s is c o m m on in s ur ve y r es e ar ch , th e a ctu al d a te s o f the e v e n ts w e re n o t ve r ifia ble . T h e s ec o nd ty p e in v olv ed s tu d en ts ’ pa r ticip atio n in la b o ra to ry r e se ar c h st ud ies . H e re , th e ac tua l d a tes w er e v er ifia b le . W e d em o n st ra te th at m o dify ing the q u es tion s as k ed pr od u c ed d iffe re n ce s in the a m o u n t o f f o rw a rd te le s co p in g in p a rtic ipa n ts ’ re sp o ns es .
INTRODUCTION ``H a v e y ou b ee n tre a te d b y a m ed ica l d o cto r d u rin g th e la st six m o n ths? ’ ’ ``O n w ha t d ate d id y o u bu y y ou r h om e c o m p u ter? ’ ’ ``S inc e th e b e g in n in g o f th is y e ar, h av e y o u b ee n th e v ictim o f a c rim e? ’ ’ ``W h en d id y o u la st try to sto p sm o k in g? ’ ’ Q ue stio n s su ch as th ese are co m m o n ly a ske d on a v a rie ty o f surv e y s to asc e rta in th e p re v a le n ce a n d fre q u en c ie s o f su c h ev en ts, an d to m a k e de c isio n s ab o u t th e a llo c atio n o f n ee d ed re sou rce s. Su c h qu e stio n s are also o f in tere st to m e m o ry re sea rch e rs, e sp ec ially th o se c on c ern e d w ith h o w tem po ra l in fo rm a tio n is rep re se nte d an d re trie v ed . P rio r in v e stig ato rs ha v e fou n d th at pe o ple ’ s
R e q u e s ts fo r re p rin ts s h o u ld b e s e n t to V in c e n t P ro h a s k a, D e p a rt m e n t o f P s y c h o l o g y , L e h m an C o lle g e , 2 5 0 W . B e d fo r d P a rk B lv d ., B ro n x , N Y , 1 0 4 6 8 ±1 5 8 9 , U S A . E m a i l: v i n c e n tp @ a lp h a .l eh m a n .c u n y .e d u T h is re se a rc h w a s s u p p o rte d b y a n o p e ra ti n g g ra n t fr o m th e N a tu ra l S c ie n c es & E n g in e e rin g R e s e arc h C o u n c il o f C a n ad a a n d b y a g ra n t fro m
th e N at io n a l In st itu te o f M e n t a l H e a lth
#R 24 M H 4 974 7 .
Ó
1 9 9 8 P s y ch o lo g y P re s s L td
456
PROHASKA, BROWN, BELLI
re sp o n ses to th ese qu e stio n s o fte n c o nta in a p a rtic u la r fo rm o f e rror ca lle d ``fo rw a rd te lesc o pin g ’ ’ . Fo rw ard te lesc o p in g is th e re p orting o f e ve n ts a s h a vin g oc c urre d m o re re ce n tly tha n th e y a c tua lly o c cu rred . F o r ex a m p le , if a resp o n d en t say s ``Y es’ ’ to visitin g a d o cto r du rin g th e la st six m on ths, w h en a ctu ally th e la st visit w a s e ig h t m o nth s a go , o r rep o rts c o m p letin g a m a jo r h o m e re p a ir d u rin g M a y , w h e n th e re p a ir w a s ac tua lly c o m p lete d d u rin g A p ril, th e re p o rt h a s b ee n fo rw ar d te le sc op e d. F o rw ard tele sco p ing e rrors a re c o m m on w h en e v er p e o ple an sw e r q ue stion s ab o ut w he n a uto b iog ra ph ic al e v en ts o c cu rred (e .g . C oh e n & Jav a , 19 9 5 ; H u tte n lo ch e r, H ed ge s, & P ro ha sk a , 1 9 8 8 ; L o ftu s & M a rbu rg er, 19 8 3 ; M ea n s & L o ftu s, 1 9 9 1 ; N eter & W a ks be rg , 1 9 6 4; R u b in & B a d d eley , 19 8 9 ; T h o m p so n , S k o w ro n sk i, & L e e, 1 9 88 ). O u r h y p oth esis is th at th e d e g re e of fo rw a rd te le sc o pin g is asso c ia ted w ith th e fo rm o f th e q ue stion tha t re sp o n de n ts a re ask e d. W e m o re fu lly de v elo p th is h yp o th esis la te r, afte r co n sid ering th e ev id en c e of fo rw ard tele sc op in g an d the ro le o f re co n struc tio n in an sw e rin g qu e stio n s ab o u t th e tim e of e ve n ts. T h e co m m o n e v id e nc e o f fo rw a rd te le sco p in g c on sists o f d iffe ren c es in th e nu m b er o f re po rts be tw e e n g ro up s . F or e xa m p le, L o ftus a nd M arb u rge r (19 8 3 ) ask e d p e op le w h e the r th ey h ad b ee n th e v ictim s o f crim e s d urin g a six -m o n th re fe ren c e p e rio d . O n e g ro u p w as g iv en a n ex p lic it la nd m ark o n w h ic h th e re fe ren c e p erio d b eg a n (th e e rup tion o f M t. S t. H e len s o r N e w Y e ars D ay ) w h ile th e o th er w as n ot (i.e. ``d u rin g th e la st six m on ths’ ’ ). T h e g rou p w itho ut th e la n d m a rk rep o rte d m o re in sta nc e s o f crim e v ictim isa tio n . L o ftus an d M a rb u rg e r co n clu d ed tha t w ith o u t th e p rese n ce of a lan d m ark , e ve n ts th at ac tu a lly oc c urre d be fo re th e re fe re nc e p e rio d w ere fo rw ar d te le sc op e d in to it. N e ter a n d W a k sb erg (1 9 64 ) c o m p a red p e o ple ’ s rep o rts o f m a jo r ho u se ho ld re p a irs an d pu rch a ses u sin g eithe r un b o un d e d o r b o u nd e d re fere nc e p erio d s. T h e sam e re sp on d en ts w ere in terv ie w e d in se p ara te w av e s o f d ata c o lle ctio n tha t oc c urre d six m o n ths ap a rt. In th e u n bo u n d ed c on d itio n , th ey w ere sim p ly to ld to in d ic a te e ve n ts sin c e th eir last in terv ie w . In th e b o un d e d co n dition , th e in terv iew e r first re a d th e ite m s rep o rte d at th e la st in te rv iew , a nd th en ask e d fo r ne w ite m s. N e te r a nd W a k sb erg fo u n d th at m o re ite m s w ere re p orte d in th e un b o u n de d in te rv ie w s. T h ey co n clu d ed th a t in th e u n bo u n de d in terv iew s, pre v io u sly re p orte d item s w e re b e in g fo rw a rd te le sc o pe d in to th e c u rren t re fe ren c e p erio d . F in ally , B ac h m a n a n d O ’ M alley (1 9 81 ) ask e d h ig h sc h oo l stu d e nts a bo u t th e ir dru g u se o v er re fere n ce p e rio d s o f d iffe ren t len g th s (e.g . th e pa st y ea r, th e pa st m o n th ). B ac h m a n a n d O ’ M a lle y fo u nd tha t sh o rte r refe re n c e p erio ds pro d uc e d relativ ely h ig h e r usa g e ra tes. A lth o ug h the y co n clu d ed th at lo ng e r re fe ren c e pe riod s le d to u n d ere stim atio n o f d rug u sag e , th e y a lso no te d tha t fo rw ar d te lesc o pin g o f e arlie r e v en ts o f dru g u sag e c o uld b e in flatin g th e estim a tes in th e sh o rter p erio ds. T h e in te rp re ta tio n o f e v ide n c e o f fo rw ard tele sc o p in g is p ro b le m a tic, ho w e v er. O bse rv e d d iffe re n ce s in th e nu m b er of re p orts a c ro ss d iffe ren t
FORWARD TELESCOPING AND QUESTION FORMAT
457
refe ren c e p erio ds m ay or m a y n o t in dic ate th e p rese n ce o f fo rw a rd te le sco p in g. A s S ud m an an d B ra d b urn (1 97 3 ) no te d, it is p o ssible th a t p e op le a re fo rge ttin g ea rlie r e v en ts a n d b e in g m or e ac cu ra te in th e sh o rte r an d m ore re ce n t re fere n ce p eriod s (th e e x pla na tio n fav o ure d b y B a ch m a n & O ’ M alley , 1 9 81 ). In o rde r to d eterm ine th e p re sen c e of fo rw ard te le sc op in g , v erific a tio n o f p eo p le ’ s re p orts is n ec essa ry . F o rtun a tely , so m e rec e n t stu d ie s h a ve b e en a ble to e x am in e fo rw a rd telesc o p in g u sin g ev e n ts w h o se d ate s ca n b e v erifie d . In a ve rific atio n stu d y , H u tten lo ch er et al. (1 9 8 8) p ro v ide d e v id e nc e fo r g rea te r ac c u ra c y in sh o rte r re fe re n c e p e rio d s. H u tte n lo c h e r et a l. a sk e d u niv ersity stu de n ts to list film s th e y h a d a tten d e d a t th e ir u niv e rsity ’ s film so cietie s. T w o re fe re n ce p e rio d s w e re use d , the e n tire a ca d em ic ye a r a nd th e m o st re ce n t ac ad e m ic q u arter. R e sults sh o w e d th at stu d en ts a sk ed o n ly ab o ut th e m o st re c en t qu a rte r rep o rte d a tte n din g m o re film s d urin g th at q ua rte r th a n d id stud e nts a sk ed a bo u t th e en tire y ea r. W ith ou t v erifica tio n d a ta, th is fin d ing c ou ld b e in terp rete d as ev id en c e of fo rw ar d te le sc o pin g in th e sh orte r re fe ren c e pe rio d. H ow e v e r, H u tte n lo c he r e t al. fo u n d w h en c o m p a rin g rep o rts to ac tu al film d ate s tha t the d iffe re n ce in the n u m b e r o f rep o rts b etw ee n th e g ro u p s w a s n o t d ue to telesc o p in g . T h at is, fo rw a rd te lesc o p in g w as p res en t in b o th g rou p s, b u t p artic ipa n ts in th e sh o rte r re fe ren c e p erio d c o nd itio n re p orte d m o re ev e n ts tha t ac tua lly o c cu rre d d u rin g th a t re fere n ce p erio d . H u tte nlo c he r et al. co n clu d ed tha t the sh orte r refe ren c e p e rio d led p e o ple to c o nd u c t a m ore tho ro u g h sea rch o f m e m o ry for the targ et e ve n ts. In a sim ilar v e in , R u b in an d B ad d e le y (1 9 89 ) co lle c ted re po rts of pe o ple ’ s atten d a n ce at a se m in a r series a n d co m pa red re po rts to th e a tte n da n c e re co rd s for the sem in a rs. A g a in forw a rd tele sco p ing w a s ob se rv ed . A no th er ty p e o f v erifia b le e v ide n ce o f fo rw ard te le sco pin g w as co lle c ted b y T ho m pso n et a l. (19 8 8 ) w h o ask e d p eo p le to ke e p d ia ries. A t a la ter tim e w h e n p eo p le rep o rte d the d a te s o f the ev e nts fro m m em ory , th e d ia rie s w ere c o nsu lted to a sc e rta in th e ac tua l d ates of th ose e ve n ts. T h o m p so n et a l. also o bse rv ed fo rw a rd te lesc o pin g o f e v en t da tes. H utten lo ch e r e t al. (19 8 8 ) p rov id ed a n e x pla na tio n o f fo rw ard te le sc o pin g b ase d on tw o fac to rs. T h e first w a s inc re asin g in ac c u rac y of in form ation in m e m o ry w ith e la pse d tim e . B a dd e ley , L ew is, a n d N im m o -Sm ith (1 97 8 ) ha d p re v io u sly d em o nstrate d tha t the a c cu rac y o f p eo p le’ s m e m o ry (ab so lu te e rro r) for w h e n e v en ts o cc u rre d d ec rea se d w ith ela pse d tim e . T h e sec o nd w a s refe ren c e p e rio d b o un d ar ie s. In the H u tte n lo c he r e t a l. m o d e l, info rm ation a bo u t o ld e r e v en ts is less p rec ise th an in fo rm a tio n ab o u t m o re re c en t e v en ts. T h us, the re is a gre a te r p rob a b ility th a t o ld e r e ve n ts w ill b e te lesc o p ed . B e c au se e ve n ts tha t o c cu rred o u tsid e th e e arly bo u n d ary of th e refe ren c e p e rio d (th o se th at ca n b e forw a rd te le sc op e d in to it) a re o ld e r th an ev e n ts insid e th e e a rly bo u n da ry (th o se tha t c an b e ba ck w a rd telesc o p ed ou t o f it) th e re su lt is n e t fo rw a rd telesc o p in g o v er an y refe re nc e p eriod . N et fo rw ard te le sc op in g w ill inc rea se o ve r p e rio d s in w h ich th e m o st re ce n t b o un d ar y is the pre sen t (b e ca u se th e re ca n
458
PROHASKA, BROWN, BELLI
ne v er b e b ac kw ard te le sco pin g o f fu ture e v en ts). R u b in an d B a d de ley (1 9 8 9 ) pro v id ed a sim ila r e xp la na tio n . In b oth th e H u tte n lo c he r e t a l. a n d R u bin a n d B a d d ele y m od e ls, n et fo rw ar d telesc o p ing is a lw ay s g o in g to o cc u r, de sp ite th e fa c t t h a t s o m e d e g r e e o f b a c k w a rd te l e sc o p i n g a l so o c c u rs . B a c k w a r d te lesc o p in g is a w e ak e r effe ct tha n forw a rd te le sc o pin g b ec au se of th e g re a te r im pre c isio n in d a tin g o ld er e v en ts th a n m o re re ce n t e v en ts, w h ich lea d s to a gre a te r te nd e n cy to fo rw ar d tele sco p e o lde r e v en ts in to the re fere n ce pe riod tha n to b a ck w ard telesc o p e m ore rec e nt e ve n ts o u tsid e of th e re fe re nc e pe rio d . W h y is fo rw ard te lesc o pin g a pro b lem ? O n a p ra ctica l le ve l, th e p re sen c e o f fo rw ar d te le sco pin g c a lls into q ue stio n the a cc u ra c y of the su rve y d ata o n w hic h m a n y d e cisio ns a b o ut re sou rc e a llo c a tio ns a re m a d e. P ub lic p erc e ptio ns a n d go v er nm en ta l p o lic y m ay b e b ase d on inflate d d a ta be c au se of forw a rd te le sc o p in g e rro rs . O n a th e o r eti ca l le v e l o f m o re c o n c e rn to m e m o ry re se a rc h ers, th e p re sen c e o f forw a rd tele sc op in g e rrors ra ise s q ue stio n s a bo u t th e rep re sen tatio n o f te m p o ra l in form atio n in m em or y an d the p roc e sse s tha t pe o ple u se to re c on stru ct te m p o ra l in form atio n. O u r sta rtin g p rem ise is th at w h e n a ske d a n y tem p ora l q u estio n ab o u t au to bio g ra p h ica l m em o ry, pe o p le e ng a ge in re c on stru ction to form an an sw e r (F ried m a n, 1 9 9 3; T h o m p so n , S k ow ro nsk i, L arse n , & B e tz , 1 9 9 6). H o w ev e r, th e re p re sen tatio n of the te m p o ral in fo rm atio n o n w h ich re co n stru c tion is ba se d is hie ra rc h ic ally org a nise d (H u tte n lo c he r et a l., 1 98 8 ). W e m a inta in tha t th e sp e c i fic q u e s tio n a sk e d w ill b e a n im p o rt a n t fa c t o r in t h e a m o u n t o f re c o nstru ctio n in w h ich resp o nd en ts e n ga g e, be c au se p e op le on ly re co n struc t to a lev e l o f d eta il su ffic ien t to form a n ap p rop ria te resp o n se . T h us, w h en p e o ple are a sk ed : ``H a v e y ou be e n tre ate d b y a m e d ic al do c to r in th e la st six m o n th s? ’ ’ th e y re trie ve ch a rac te ristic s of th e ev e nt an d m a tc h th em ag ain st ch a ra c te ristic s of th e re fere nc e p e rio d . F o r e xa m p le , p eo p le m ig h t c o nsid er h o w co ld it w as o n th e ir la st d o c to r visit, o r w h a t the y w e re w ea ring , o r w h e th e r it w as d urin g a n ac ad e m ic se m e ster. If th e se ch a rac teristic s m atc h th e re fe ren c e pe riod (c o ld ov e r th e la st six m o n ths, be in g in sch o o l, etc .), th e y c an resp o n d ``Y es’ ’ an d sto p re c o nstru ctin g at th at po in t. T he re is n o n ee d to rec o nstru ct a n e x ac t c alen d a r da te . In c on tra st, a q u estio n suc h a s: ``O n w ha t d ate w e re yo u la st tre a te d b y a m e d ic a l d oc tor? ’ ’ c o m p e ls resp o n d en ts to th ink ca refu lly ab o u t w h en th e ta rge t ev e nt h a p pe n e d an d re co n stru c t an e x ac t d ate . W h en fa ce d w ith th e d ate qu e stio n , resp o n d en ts m a y b e m o re lik e ly to e x ec u te a m ore ex ten siv e re trie va l attem p t to estim a te th e d a te. T h u s, m o re co n tex tu al info rm a tio n a ssoc iate d w ith re m e m b ering the la st e v en t is lik e ly to co m e to m in d . W e be lie v e th at w h e n pe o ple spe n d le ss effo rt in re c o nstru ctin g th e tem p ora l in fo rm ation ab o ut ev e nts, th e y w ill b e m o re in a cc u rate in th e ir re p or ts an d , th u s, th ey w ill ha v e a g re a te r te n d en c y to fo rw ard te lesc o p e tho se re p or ts, c o nsiste nt w ith th e b o u nd a ry m od e l of te le sco p in g first a d va n c ed by H u tte n lo c h er e t a l. O n e stu dy b y L o ftu s, K lin g e r, S m ith , a n d F ie d le r (1 99 0 ), sou g h t to red u c e th e am o un t o f o bse rv ed fo rw ard tele sco p ing in p eo p le’ s re p orts. In a n e xte nsio n o f
FORWARD TELESCOPING AND QUESTION FORMAT
459
N ete r a n d W a k sb erg ’ s (1 9 6 4) p roc e d ure , th ey fou n d th at forw a rd tele sc op in g o f rep o rts o f h ea lth p roc e du re s ov e r a tw o-m o nth refe ren c e p e rio d w ere re d u ce d w he n p artic ip a nts w e re first a sk ed a b ou t th e sam e he a lth p ro ce d ure s o v er a six m o n th refe ren ce pe riod . W e su g g es t th a t th e ir pro c e du re m a y h a ve e n co u ra ge d p eo p le w h o rec e iv e d th e six-m o nth p erio d first to e n g ag e in a m ore e xte nsiv e retrie v al o f info rm ation in th e tw o -m o n th pe rio d in co m pa riso n to tho se w h o o nly a nsw ere d for th e tw o -m o n th p eriod . A n sw erin g ab o u t th e six -m o nth p e rio d first m ay ha v e ind ica ted to re sp o nd e nts th e im p o rta n ce of p re cise ly estim a tin g for th e tw o -m o n th pe rio d , le a din g to a m ore c om p le te re c on stru ction to d eterm ine w h e th e r a n e v en t h a d ind e e d o cc u rre d w ithin th e p ast tw o m o n ths. It sh ou ld b e re m em b ere d, h o w e v e r, th at fo rw ard te le sc op in g is still q uite lik e ly to o cc u r, as p rior inv e stig a to rs h av e de m o n stra te d, ev e n w h e n p eo p le e n ga g e in ex ten siv e rec o nstru c tio n, b u t o ur hy p o th e sis is th at it w ill o c cu r les s o fte n tha n w he n p eo p le’ s resp o n ses c an b e b a sed o n le ss e xte nsiv e re trie va l. T o te st o ur h y po th esis w e c o nd u c ted tw o e xp e rim en ts. T h e m ajo r differe nc e b etw ee n the m is th at E x pe rim en t 1 a ske d ab o u t an e ve n t (a v isit to a m ed ica l d oc tor) fo r w hic h th e tru e da tes c o uld n o t b e v erifie d . H o w ev e r, E xp e rim en t 2 ask e d a b o ut e ve n ts (stu de n ts’ p a rtic ip a tio n in rese a rc h stu d ies) for w h ich the tru e d ates co u ld be v e rified . O th e r diffe ren ce s b e tw e e n th e ex p er im en ts a re d iscu sse d later.
EXPERIMENT 1 In E xp e rim en t 1, w e e x plo red forw a rd tele sco p ing u sin g a m e th o d o lo g y co m m o n to su rve y re sea rc h. P a rtic ip a nts w e re ask e d e ith er a ``Y e s/N o’ ’ o r ex ac t d ate q u estio n a bo u t b e in g tre ate d b y a m ed ic al d o c tor. T w o d iffe re n t re fere n ce p eriod s, tw o m o n ths an d fo u r m o n th s w ere u sed . O u r p re d ic tion w a s th at le ss telesc o p in g w ou ld b e o b serv e d w h e n p a rtic ip a n ts re co n stru c te d a n e x ac t d a te a s a re sp on se .
Method P a rtic ipa n ts. P a rtic ip a nts w e re 20 5 u n de rg rad u ate stu de n ts at th e U n iv ersity o f A lb erta , w ho w ere e n rolle d in In trod u c to ry P sy c h olo g y d u rin g th e sp rin g 19 9 5 sem este r. P ro c e d u re . D u rin g c la ss o n 3 1 M a rc h , 1 9 9 5 , e a c h p a rtic ip a n t w a s ran d o m ly g ive n a fo ld ed a n d stap led she e t o f p ap e r. E a ch she et co n ta in ed on e o f th re e qu e stio n s a bo u t visits to m e d ic al d o c to rs. T h e 2-M o n th g ro up ’ s qu e stio n w as: ``In the last T W O m o nth s h a ve y o u b ee n tre ate d o r ex a m in ed b y a p hy sicia n ?’ ’ T h e 4 -M o n th g ro u p’ s q ue stio n w a s th e sam e bu t w ith ``F O U R m o n th s’ ’ rep lac in g ``T W O m o n th s’ ’ . T h e D ate g ro u p ’ s qu e stio n w a s: ``O n w ha t d ate w e re y ou last ex a m in ed by a p h ysic ian . P lea se b e a s ex a ct as p o ssib le , b u t estim a te th e d a y (or th e m o n th) if n ec essa ry ’ ’ . B ec a us e pa rtic ipa n ts w ere te ste d
460
PROHASKA, BROWN, BELLI
o n th e las t d a y of M a rc h , w e w e re ab le to u se p a rtia l re sp o n ses a n d ap p ro xim a tion s, su ch a s ``F e b ru a ry’ ’ or ``Ja n ua ry 1 5 o r 1 6’ ’ . T o ke e p th e to ta l nu m b er o f re fere n ce a n d d ate g ro u p s sim ilar th e re w e re tw ic e as m a n y sh ee ts w ith th e da te q u estio n.
Results T h e p erc en tag e s o f ``Y e s’ ’ re sp on se s in th e 2 - an d 4 -M o nth g ro u p s a n d th e pe rc en tag e s o f d a te s th at fe ll w ith in ea c h refe ren c e p eriod are p res en ted in T a ble 1. A ch i-sq ua re a na ly sis rev e ale d th at th e 2 -M o nth g ro up g av e m o re ``Y e s’ ’ re sp o n ses (57 % ) th an the D a te g rou p ga v e rep o rts th at fe ll w ith in th e tw o -m o n th 2 re fe ren c e p erio d (3 5 % ), c (1, N = 15 5 ) = 7 .4 5 , P < .0 1 . H ow e v er, th e d iffe ren c e 2 be tw e e n th e 4-M o n th (6 2 % ) a n d D a te (49 % ) w as n o t sig n ific an t, c (1 , N = 15 0 ) = 2 .2 6 . It is in tere stin g to n ote tha t th e pe rce n tag e o f p eo p le w h o a n sw e re d ``Y e s’ ’ did n o t c ha n g e w ith th e ch a ng e in th e le n g th of th e re fe re n ce p erio d . T h at is, 57 % a nsw e red ``Y es’ ’ in th e tw o -m o nth ref ere nc e pe riod a nd 6 2 % a n sw ere d ``Y e s’ ’ in th e fou r-m o n th re fere n ce pe riod , a n in c re a se o f o nly 5% d esp ite a 50 % inc rea se in th e re fere n ce p erio d. In co n tra st, in th e D ate g ro u p th e pe rc en tag e of p a rtic ip a nts w h o re p orte d b e in g tre a te d rose from 3 5% d urin g th e la st tw o m o n ths to 49 % du rin g th e las t fo u r m o nth s, a n in cre as e o f 14 % .
Discussion O u r h y p oth esis, th a t th e d a te q u estio n w o u ld re su lt in le ss forw a rd te le sc op in g th a n the y e s/n o qu e stio n , w as sup p o rte d in th e tw o -m o n th refe ren c e p eriod . T h e re are sev e ral p o ssible re aso n s w h y the sa m e p a tter n o f re su lts w as n o t ob se rv ed in th e fo u r-m o n th refe re n ce pe rio d . O ne re aso n m ay be d u e to the u se of stud e nts a s p artic ip a nts. T he en d of th e fo u r-m o n th pe riod co in cid ed w ith th e en d o f th e p rio r se m e ster, th us p ro v idin g a firm bo u n d ary th at m a y h av e a tte n u a te d th e 4 -M on th g ro u p ’ s ten d e n c y to fo rw a rd te le sc o p e . A n o th e r po ssib ility, c o nsisten t w ith ou r h y p o th e sis, is tha t th e D a te g ro u p ’ s m o re
TABLE 1 Experiment 1 R e fe r e n c e P e r io d C o n d itio n 2 - M o n th , n = 5 4
T w o m o n th s 5 7%
4 - M o n th , n = 5 0 D a te , n = 1 0 1
F o u r m o nths
6 2% 3 5%
4 9%
P e rc e n t a g e o f p a rti ci p a n ts in d ic a tin g th e y h a d b ee n e x a m in e d b y a m e d i ca l d o c to r w i th in t h e re s p e c ti v e re fe re n c e p e ri o d .
FORWARD TELESCOPING AND QUESTION FORMAT
461
ex ten siv e retriev a l led to th e ir rem em b erin g m ore e v en ts in th e lo ng e r re fere n ce p eriod . F in ally, a th ird p o ssibility , also c o nsiste nt w ith o ur hy p o th e sis, is th a t th e tw o - an d fou r-m o n th re fere nc e p e riod s w ere n o t su fficien tly d iffe re nt to a llo w p artic ipa n ts to d istin g u ish th e fa m ilia rity o r a va ila b ility o f th e ev e n t. T h at is, p artic ipa n ts m a y h av e sim p ly ju d g e d w h e th e r a m e d ic a l tre atm en t w as re c en t an d thu s w ith in ra n g e (w h eth er th e ra n ge w as tw o - o r fou r-m on th s), o r n o t re c en t an d thu s o u t o f ran g e. Inte rp re tatio n s of E x p e rim en t 1 su ffe r fro m all o f th e p rob le m s inh e ren t in d ata tha t c an n o t b e v erifie d th at w e re d isc u sse d ea rlie r. F o r ex am p le, the re c ou ld h av e b ee n d iffe ren ce s in d o cto r v isits b e tw e en th e g ro u p s o f w h ic h w e h ad n o k no w led g e . B ec au se w e d id n o t h a ve ac c e ss to pa rtic ipa n ts’ a c tu a l m ed ica l rec o rd s, n o a tte m p t c o uld b e m ad e to c ollec t d ire c t e vid en c e o f d iffe ren tial telesc o p in g b etw ee n the refe ren c e p e rio d s. E x pe rim en t 2 w as d e sig n ed to circ um v en t th is lim ita tio n .
EXPERIMENT 2 In E x p erim e n t 2 , th e e ve n ts w e u sed w e re stu d en ts’ pa rtic ip ation in rese arc h stud ies du rin g an a c ad em ic sem este r. P a rtic ip a n ts re p o rte d eithe r th e nu m b er o f tim es th e y ha d p a rtic ip a te d in rese arc h stu die s (the y c ou ld h av e p a rtic ip a te d o nc e , tw ic e, o r n o t a t all) o r th e ex a ct da tes o n w hic h th ey ha d p a rtic ip a ted . T h e d ata w ere c o llec te d th re e m o n th s after th e se m e ster b e g an an d a tw o-m on th refe ren c e pe rio d w a s u sed so th at fo rw a rd telesc o p in g e rrors w o u ld b e p ossib le. A s w e w e re ab le to a sce rtain w he n stu de n ts p artic ipa te d fro m atte n d an c e she e ts, w e w e re a b le to v erify p a rtic ip a n t’ s re po rts.
Method P a rtic ipa n ts. P a rtic ip a nts w e re 1 43 un d erg ra du a te stu d en ts a t L e h m a n C olleg e , T h e C ity U n iv e rsity o f N e w Y o rk , w h o w e re e nro lled in tw o sec tio n s o f G en e ra l P sy c ho lo g y d urin g th e a u tu m n 1 99 5 se m e ste r. T his co u rse co n tain s a rese arc h req u irem en t a n d on e o f the w a y s tha t stud e n ts ca n (an d m o st o ften d o ) fulfil th is re q uire m e nt is to p artic ip ate in tw o re sea rch stud ie s. P ro ce d u re . R e se a rc h stu d ie s w e r e a v a ilab le fo r stu d en t p a rtici pa tio n thro u gh o u t th e sem este r, fro m 1 1 S ep te m b er to 12 D ec em b er, o n v ario us d ate s an d tim e s, a n d stud e n ts se lec te d th e stu d ie s, d ate s, an d tim e s th e y p re fe rred . A t the e nd of th e ir c lasse s, o n 6 D e ce m be r, e x ac tly th re e ca le n da r m on th s a fte r cla sses b eg an , stu d en ts w e re g iv en o n e o f tw o q ue stio n s a b ou t th eir p a rtic ip a tio n in re sea rch stu die s. T he form at w a s th e sam e a s in E xp e rim en t 1; e ac h p artic ipa n t w a s g iv e n a fo ld ed sh ee t o n w hic h o n e o f th e tw o p o ssible qu e stio n s w as p rin te d. T h e R e fe ren c e P e riod g ro u p w e re sim p ly ask ed to in d ic ate th e n um b er o f stud ies in w h ic h the y p a rtic ip a te d d u ring th e last tw o m o nth s. T h e D ate g ro u p w as ask e d for th e ex a ct d ate (s) o n w h ich th e y pa rtic ipa ted . B e c au se
462
PROHASKA, BROWN, BELLI
w e w ere in te rested in forw a rd te le sco p in g, w e a rra n ge d tha t m a ny stu die s w e re av a ila b le fo r pa rtic ip ation in S e p te m b e r (i.e. e arlie r th an th e re fe re n ce p e rio d ) an d tha t th e tw o in stru c tors re m in d ed stu d en ts ab o u t th is req u ire m e n t thro u gh o u t th e ea rly p a rt o f th e se m e ster.
Results F irst, w e co m pa red the p e rce n tag e o f ``Y es’ ’ re sp o nse s by th e R efe ren c e P e rio d gro u p to th e pe rce n tag e o f d ate s re po rte d b y th e D a te g rou p th a t fe ll into th e tw o -m on th refe ren c e p eriod . T he se d a ta a re pre sen te d in T a ble 2 . A c hi-sq ua re 2 an aly sis fo u n d n o s ig n ifica n t d iffe re n c e b e tw e e n th e g ro u p s, c (2 , N = 14 3 ) = 2 .6 . H o w e v e r, e v id e nc e o f fo rw a rd tele sco p ing w a s o b se rv e d w ith in th e R e fere n ce P e rio d g ro u p . S p ec ific ally , a lth o ug h th e D ate g ro u p w as e v en ly div id e d b etw ee n tho se w ho rep o rte d o n e (4 0% ) a nd th ose w h o re po rte d tw o (4 % ) d a te s, in th e R e fe ren c e Pe riod gro u p m o re p articip a nts (5 3 % ) re p or te d 2 co m ple tin g tw o stu d ie s th an rep o rte d co m ple tin g o n ly o n e (2 9% ), c (2 , N = 83 ) = 1 6 .3 , P < .0 0 5 . T h ese d a ta a lso a llo w ed u s to e x am in e d iffere nc e s in th e a cc u rac y o f rep o rts be tw e e n th e tw o gro u ps b y m a tch ing p artic ip an ts’ re po rts to a tte nd a n c e sh e ets. F o r th e R e fe re n ce P erio d g ro u p, c orre ct resp o n se s w o u ld be ``Y e s’ ’ resp o n ses a n d re c o rde d p artic ipa tion w ithin the tw o -m o nth re fe re nc e p eriod . S im ilarly, fo r th e D a te c on d itio n, th e rep o rte d d a te sim ply h a d to be c o rre c t a s to w he th er it w a s w ith in o r ou tsid e the tw o-m on th refe ren c e p e rio d . T h ese d ata a re pre sen ted in T a ble 3 . T h e R e fere n ce Pe rio d g rou p w as sig nifica n tly m o re like ly to b e in c orre c t, 2 eithe r w h e n re p ortin g tha t th ey h ad p articip ate d tw ic e , c (1 , N = 68 ) = 4 .4 , P < .0 5 , 2 or on c e, c (1, N = 4 8) = 4.2 , P < .0 5 . S p e cifica lly , 8 2% o f the p a rtic ip a te s w h o said the y h ad p artic ip a te d in tw o stud ies du rin g th e tw o -m o n th re fe re n ce p erio d w e re in co rrec t. In c on trast o n ly 5 8 % o f tho se w h o g a ve tw o d a tes w ith in the tw o m o n th re fere n ce p e rio d w e re in c orre ct. S im ila rly 58 % o f tho se w h o said th ey h a d pa rtic ip ated o nc e d u rin g th e tw o -m o nth re fe re n ce pe rio d w ere in co rre ct, w hile on ly 2 9 % of th o se w h o ga v e o ne d a te w ithin th e tw o -m o n th refe ren c e p eriod w e re in c o rre c t. T h e m o st co m m o n erro r w as fo rw ard tele sco p ing ; tha t is, stu de n ts said
TABLE 2 Experiment 2 R e s p o n se C o n d it io n
T w ic e
O nce
N o ne
R e fe re n ce P e ri o d , n = 8 3
5 3%
2 9%
18%
D a te , n = 6 0
4 0%
4 0%
20%
P e rc e n ta g e o f p a rt ic ip a n ts in d i ca t in g th ey h a d p a rtic i p a te d in re se a rc h s tu d i e s w it h i n th e tw o -m o n th r ef ere n c e p e rio d .
FORWARD TELESCOPING AND QUESTION FORMAT
463
TABLE 3 Experiment 2: Accuracy by Condition and Responses
R e fer en c e P e rio d Ð s a id T W O
C o r re c t
In c o r r e c t
8 (1 8 % )
3 6 (8 2 % )
D a t eÐ 2 d a te s i n p e rio d
1 0 (4 2 % )
1 4 (5 8 % )
R e fer en c e P e rio d Ð s a id O N E
1 0 (4 2 % )
1 4 (5 8 % )
D a t eÐ 2 d a te s : 1 i n , 1 o u t o r 1 d a t e i n
1 7 (7 1 % )
7 (2 9 % )
the y h ad pa rtic ip a ted w ithin th e tw o -m o n th pe riod (in O c to b e r or N o v e m b e r), w he n ac tua lly th ey h ad p artic ip ate d e a rlie r (in Se p te m b er).
Discussion Inc rea se d forw a rd te le sc op in g b a se d o n a c o m p a riso n o f re p or te d an d ac tua l info rm a tio n b y th e g rou p a ske d th e ea sie r q ue stio n w as o b serv e d. Ind irec t ev id en c e o f fo rw a rd te lesc o p in g w as o b se rve d w ith in th e R e fere n ce P erio d g ro u p (i.e . m ore ``T W O ’ ’ re sp on se s), bu t n ot b e tw e en th e gro u p s (i.e. th ere w ere n ot m o re ``Y e s’ ’ re sp o n ses from the R efe ren ce P e rio d g ro u p th a n da tes w ithin the re fe re n ce p erio d by th e D ate g ro u p ). W e th ink th is lac k o f a b etw ee n -gro u p s d iffe re n ce is d u e to the fa ct th at the re w as a h igh le ve l o f pa rtic ip a tio n in th e ev e n t in q u e stio n . U n lik e th e e ve n t u tilise d in E xp e rim en t 1 , v isitin g a d o cto r fo r a rou tine c h ec k -up , p articip ation in a re se arc h stud y w a s, in a se n se, a c ou rse req u ire m en t, so ou r rate of p o sitive re spo n ses fro m b o th g ro up s w as h ig h.
GENERAL DISCUSSION O ur sta rtin g pre m ise , tha t p eo p le u se rec on stru ction w h e n a n sw erin g qu e stio n s ab o u t th e tim e o f a u to b io gra ph ica l e ve n ts, is a w id e ly a cc e p te d o ne . In d ee d , th is p re m ise is a cc ep ted in reg a rd to the d atin g o f p ub lic ev e nt s as w e ll (e .g . B ro w n, 1 9 9 0 ; B u rt & K e m p , 1 9 9 1 ). F u rth e rm o re , th e p re m i se th at m e m o ry is h ie rarc h ic a lly o rga n ise d also is w ell ac c ep ted (e .g . B a rsa lou , 1 98 8 ; B e lli, th is issu e; B ro w n , 1 9 9 0; C on w a y , 1 9 9 6; H u tte n loc h er e t a l., 1 9 8 8 ). F ina lly , B ad d ele y e t a l. (1 9 7 8), H u tte n lo c h er et al. (1 9 88 ), a nd R ub in a n d B ad d ele y (19 8 9 ) d em o nstra ted th at fo rw ard te le sc op in g is rela te d to the in cre asin g ina cc u ra cy of m em o ry w ith e la p sed tim e . O ur sp e cific h y p oth e sis, b ase d o n th e se th ree starting p re m ises, w a s th a t th e q ue stio n fo rm at w ou ld in flu e n ce th e am o un t of forw a rd te le sc op in g o b serv e d in p eo p le ’ s rep o rts. W e b e lie ve tha t th e m ore diffic u lt q ue stion (``R e po rt th e ex ac t d ate’ ’ ) le d re spo n d en ts to e n ga g e in a m o re tho ro u gh re c o nstru ctiv e pro ce ss, resu ltin g in a b e tte r lo c ation of th e e v en ts in tim e a n d g rea te r rela tiv e ac c ura cy . T h e sim ple r q u estion s (``W ere yo u tre ate d? ’ ’ ``H o w m an y tim e s did yo u
464
PROHASKA, BROWN, BELLI
pa rtic ip ate? ’ ’ ) led re spo n d en ts to sim p ly in fer th e e ve n ts’ re c en cy , ra th e r tha n attem p t to pre cise ly lo ca te e ac h in tim e. T h e fo cu s o f th e p re sen t stu d y w a s on a uto b io g rap h ica l e v en ts w ith re lative ly lo w fre q u en c ie s of o cc u rre n c e. A sk ing th e m o re difficu lt q u estio n a bo u t h igh e rfre q u en c y e v en ts (e .g . ``R ep o rt th e e x ac t da tes d u rin g th e la st tw o m o nth s tha t yo u : p u rc h a sed g a so lin e for yo u r c ar; ate be e f fo r d in n e r; ex er cised ’ ’ ) m ig h t pro d uc e to o h ig h a d em a nd o n p e op le an d lea d to less ac cu ra te re su lts. In d e ed , M e a n s an d L o ftus (1 9 9 1) sho w e d tha t p e op le’ s stra teg ies for an sw erin g qu e stio n s c h an g e d de p en d ing on th e freq u en c y o f the e v en ts. H ow e v er, the ir stu d y also d em o nstrate d th a t th e m a nn e r in w h ich p eo p le a re q u e stio ne d co u ld in c re a se a cc u rac y e v en w ith h ig h-freq u e n cy ev e nts. F ina lly, fo rw ard te le sc op in g also is ob se rve d w h e n p e op le a re ask e d to rep o rt tem p or al in form a tio n a bo u t disc rete p u b lic e ve n ts a n d w e b e lie ve it lik ely th a t resu lts sim ilar to tho se o f th e pre se nt stud y w o uld b e o b serv e d in th is do m ain as w e ll. A s the m o d e ls o f H u tten loc h er e t a l. (1 9 8 8) a nd R ub in an d B a dd e ley (1 9 8 9 ) in d ic a te, so m e fo rw a rd te le sc o pin g is a lm o st a lw a ys go in g to o c cu r in p e o ple ’ s re p o rts, a n d w ill co n tin u e to b e a pro b lem fo r surv ey rese a rch e rs w h en e v er the y ca n no t v e rify re sp o nd e n ts’ rep o rts. M o reo v er , th ere a re situ a tio n s fo r w h ich th e da tin g q ue stio n m ig ht n ot n e ce ssa rily le a d to m o re a c cu rate re sp on se s. F o r ex a m p le, a skin g p eo p le to d a te fre qu e n tly o cc u rrin g m un d a ne e v en ts m igh t lea d to un d e r-re po rting be c au se th e relev a n t ev e n t in sta nc e s a re ra p id ly fo rg otten . N o n e the less, o u r da ta su gg e st th at ask in g resp o n d en ts to pro v id e a m o re p re cise re sp o n se reg a rdin g th e tim ing o f e v en ts w ill e n co u rag e a m o re th o ro u g h re c o nstru ctio n w h ic h w ill re d u ce forw a rd te le sco p in g. T h u s, b y m ak in g p e o ple w o rk a little h ard e r in d e term in ing w h e n ev en ts h a d oc c urre d , su rv ey re sea rch e rs w ill lik ely ga in m o re a cc u ra te d a ta .
REFERENCES B a c h m a n , J .G ., & O ’ M a lle y , P .M . (1 9 8 1 ). W h e n fo u r m o n th s eq u al a y e ar: In c o n s i st e n c ie s in s t u d e n t r ep o rts o f d ru g u se P u b li c O p in io n Q u a r te r ly , 4 5 , 5 3 6 ±5 4 8 . B a d d e le y , A .D ., L e w is , V ., & N im m o -S m i th , I. (1 9 7 8 ). W h e n d i d y o u l a st . . .? In M .M . G ru n e b e rg , P .E . M o rris , & R .N . S y k e s (E d s.), P r a c tic a l a s p e c ts o f m e m o r y . N e w Y o r k : A c a d em i c P re ss . B a rs al o u , L .W . ( 1 9 8 8 ). T h e c o n t en t a n d o rg a n i za t io n o f a u t o b io g r ap h ic a l m e m o ries . In U . N e is s e r & E . W in o g ra d (E d s .), R e m e m b e r in g r e c o n s id er e d . N e w Y o rk : C am b rid g e U n iv er si ty P r es s . B e lli, R .F . (t h i s i s su e ). T h e s tr u c tu re o f a u to b i o g rap h i c a l m e m o ry an d th e e v e n t h is to ry ca l e n d a r: P o t e n t ia l im p ro v e m e n ts in th e q u a li ty o f re tro s p e c tiv e re p o rts in s u rv e y s . M e m o r y , 6 . B ro w n , N .R . (1 9 9 0 ). O rg a n i z at io n o f p u b l ic e v e n ts in lo n g -t e rm m e m o r y . J o u r n a l o f E x p er i m e n ta l P s y ch o lo g y : G en e r a l, 1 1 9 , 2 9 7 ±3 1 4 . B u rt , C .D .B ., & K e m p , S . (1 9 9 1 ). R e tro s p e c tiv e d u ra ti o n es t im a tio n o f p u b li c e v e n t s. M e m o r y & C o g n i tio n , 1 9 , 2 5 2 ±2 6 2 . C o h e n , G ., & J a v a , R . (1 9 9 5 ). M e m o ry fo r m e d ic a l h is to ry : A c c u rac y o f re c a ll . A p p li e d C o g n i tiv e P s y ch o lo g y , 9 , 2 7 3 ±2 8 8 . C o n w a y , M .A . (1 9 9 6 ) . A u to b io g ra p h i c al k n o w le d g e a n d a u to b i o g rap h i c a l m e m o ri e s. In D .C . R u b in ( E d .), R e m em b er in g o u r p a s t: S tu d i e s i n a u to b io g r a p h i c a l m e m o r y (p p .6 7 ±9 3 ). N e w Y o rk : C am b rid g e U n iv e rsi ty P re ss .
FORWARD TELESCOPING AND QUESTION FORMAT
465
F ri ed m a n , W .J . (1 9 9 3 ). M e m o ry fo r th e t im e o f p a s t e v en ts . P sy c h o l o g ic a l B u ll et in , 1 1 3 , 4 4 ±6 6 . H u t te n l o c h e r, J ., H e d g e s , L .V ., & P ro h a s k a , V . (1 9 8 8 ) . H ie ra rc h ica l o r g a n iz a tio n i n o rd er ed d o m a in s: E s tim a ti n g th e d a te s o f e v e n t s . P s y c h o lo g i c a l R e v ie w , 9 5 , 4 7 1 ±4 8 4 . L o ftu s , E .F ., K li n g e r, M .R ., S m i th , K .D ., & F ie d le r, J . (1 9 9 0 ). A ta le o f t w o q u e s ti o n s : B e n e fit s o f a sk in g m o re th an o n e q u e s tio n . P u b l ic O p i n i o n Q u a rt e rl y, 5 4 , 3 3 0 ±3 4 5 . L o ftu s , E .F ., & M a rb u rg e r, W . (1 9 8 3 ). S in ce t h e e ru p t io n o f M t . S t . H e le n s, h a s a n y o n e b e at e n y o u u p ? Im p ro v in g t h e a c cu ra cy o f re tro sp e c tiv e re p o rts w i th la n d m a rk e v e n ts . M e m o ry & C o g n itio n , 1 1 , 1 1 4 ±1 2 0 . M e a n s, B ., & L o ft u s , E .F . ( 1 9 9 1 ). W h e n p e rs o n a l h i s to ry re p e a ts itse lf : D e c o m p o si n g m e m o rie s fo r re c u rri n g e v e n t s . A p p l ie d C o g n it iv e P s y c h o lo g y , 5 , 2 9 7 ±3 1 8 . N e te r, J ., & W a k s b e rg , J . ( 1 9 6 4 ). A st u d y o f r es p o n s e err o rs in e x p e n d i tu re s d a ta fro m h o u s e h o l d in te rv ie w s . J o u r n a l o f A m e ri c a n S ta ti s tic a l A s s o c i a t io n , 5 9 , 1 8 ±5 5 . R u b i n , D .C ., & B a d d e le y , A .D . (1 9 8 9 ). T el e sc o p in g i s n o t t im e c o m p re s s io n : A m o d e l o f th e d a t in g o f a u to b i o g rap h ic a l e v e n ts . M e m o r y & C o g n i tio n , 1 7 , 6 5 3 ±6 6 1 . S u d m a n , S ., & B ra d b u rn , N .M . (1 9 7 3 ). E ffe c ts o f t im e a n d m e m o ry fa c to rs o n re s p o n se i n su rv ey s . J o u r n a l o f A m e r ic a n S ta t is ti c a l A s s o c ia t io n , 6 3 , 8 0 5 ±8 1 5 . T h o m p s o n , C .P ., S k o w ro n s k i , J .J ., L ar se n , S .F ., & B e tz , A .L . (1 9 9 6 ) . A u t o b io g r a p h i c a l m e m o r y : R e m e m b er in g w h a t a n d re m e m b e r in g w h e n . H i llsd a le : L aw re n c e E rlb au m A ss o c ia te s In c . T h o m p s o n , C .P ., S k o w ro n s k i, J .J ., & L ee , D .J . (1 9 8 8 ). T e l e sc o p i n g in d a tin g n a tu ra lly o c c u rrin g e v e n ts . M em o r y & C o g n it io n , 1 6 , 4 6 1 ±4 6 8 .
M E M O R Y , 1 9 9 8 , 6 (4 ), 4 6 7 ±4 7 4
H o w M e m o r y R e se a r c h c a n B e n e fit fr o m C A S M D a n ie l B . W rig h t U n ive rsity o f B ristol, U K
E liz a b e th F . L o ftu s U niv ersity o f W a sh ing to n, U SA
R es ea r ch o n c og n itiv e a s pe c ts o f s ur ve y m e th o do lo g y ( C A S M ) h a s h elpe d su rv e y r es e ar c he rs to un d er st a n d the pr o ce ss e s in v o lv ed in r es po n din g to s ur v ey q u e s tio n s . T h e s u r v e y s itu a tio n , a n d th e m e th o d s e m p lo y e d b y C A S M re se a rc h er s, c a n also b e us ed to b e n ef it c og n itiv e p s yc h o lo gy . I n p a r ticu lar , th e si ze an d c o ve r ag e o f sa m p le su rv e y s, a n d th e tec h niq ue s u se d to e xa m ine h o w re sp o nd e n ts u n de r st an d su rv e y q u es tion s , c ou ld b e o f m u c h v a lu e fo r e x p lo ring so m e a s p e c ts o f m e m o ry re se a rc h . W e giv e so m e e xa m p le s w h er e this is be ing do n e a n d u rg e o th e r s to fo llo w su it.
INTRODUCTION A pp ly ing p sy ch o lo gic al th e ories an d m eth o ds to un d e rsta n d the re sp on se p ro c esse s in surv e y s h a s b ee n on e of th e suc c esse s o f th e in cre as in g a pp lic a tio n o f m e m o ry rese arc h to re a l w o rld pro b le m s. T h e p a pe rs in this sp e cial issu e are testam en t to th is. T h e ``c o g n itive a sp ec ts o f su rv ey m eth o do lo g y’ ’ (C A S M ) p ro g ra m m e s h a ve jo ine d c og n itiv e a n d s oc ia l p sy c h o log ists w ith su rv e y rese arc h e rs an d so c ial sta tisticia ns . B o th o f u s h a ve h a d th e p le asu re o f ta kin g p art in th is c o lla bo ra tio n . H e re , h o w ev e r, w e tak e a m o re e g oistic sta n ce a s m e m o ry re sea rch e rs. It is c le ar, a nd th is h a s b e en by de sign , th at m uc h C A S M rese arc h h as tak e n p la ce to b e ne fit surv e y rese a rch ers (fo r e x am p le, Jab in e, S tra f, T an u r, & T o u ran g e au , 1 9 8 4; M o ss & G o ld ste in , 1 9 7 9; T a n ur, 1 9 9 2). B u t this is rea lly a tw o -w a y stre et. W e sho u ld also b e a sk in g w h at b en e fits c o gn itiv e rese arc h , a nd in p a rtic ula r m em or y re sea rc h, c an a ch iev e fro m th is co lla b ora tio n . W e thin k th e be n efits fa ll in to tw o c ate go rie s. F irst, p sy ch o lo gy the o ries c an b e ex p lo re d in a d iffere nt se ttin g. S o m e rese arc h e rs h a ve g o ne to g re at len g ths to d esc rib e ho w v a lid ating lab o ra to ry fin d ing s in o the r settin g s is v ita l to assu re the g e ne ra lity of th e re sults o f lab o ra to ry rese arc h . W e a g re e w ith th is, bu t in a d d ition fee l tha t th e su rv e y is a
R e q u e s ts fo r r ep rin ts s h o u l d b e se n t t o D a n i e l B . W rig h t, D e p a rtm e n t o f E x p e rim e n ta l P s y c h o lo g y , 8 W o o d la n d R o ad , U n iv e rsi ty o f B ri st o l , B ris t o l B S 8 1 T N , U K . E m a i l: D .B .W ri g h t@ B r is to l.a c.u k
Ó
1 9 9 8 P s y ch o lo g y P re s s L td
468
WRIGHT AND LOFTUS
va lu ab le situ atio n , in its o w n rig ht, fo r ex p lo rin g so m e m em o ry p he n om e n a. It is th e sim ilaritie s b etw e en th e surv e y in terv ie w an d m an y lab o rato ry situ atio n s tha t allow hy p o th e se s to be e x am ine d in th is re la tive ly co n tro lle d e n viro nm e n t. T h e re a re o f co u rse differe n ce s b e tw e e n th e tw o . F o r som e h yp o the se s a la b o rato ry is b etter su ite d, b u t fo r o the rs a surv e y is b e tte r (a nd for so m e , ne ith e r is a pp ro p ria te). W e disc uss w h e re m e m o ry rese a rch e rs m ig h t w a n t to tak e ad v an ta ge o f th e d iffere nc e s an d use su rve y s for th eir rese arc h . T h e se co n d be n efit is th a t m em o ry re sea rc he rs ca n u se so m e o f th e te c h niq ue s th at are o fte n em p lo y ed in C A S M rese arc h . M u ch C A S M re se arc h ha s fo cu se d on h o w p eo p le in te rp ret q u estion s a n d th e stra te g ies p e o ple use to a n sw e r q u e s tio n s. S o m e o f th is C A S M e n e rg y c a n b e d ire c te d to th e m e th o d o lo g ica l p rob lem s th a t w e cu rren tly fac e in m e m o ry re sea rc h. F o r ex a m p le, m e m o ry rese a rch e rs no w re g ula rly a sk sub je cts a bo u t m e ta-c o gn itio n s: ``re m e m b e r’ ’ v e rsus ``k n ow ’ ’ , h o w clea r th e ir m e m o ry is, w h eth e r th ey h av e life pe rio d s o f am n esia , e tc . Q u estio ns o f this typ e c an b e d iffic u lt fo r sub jec ts to an sw e r. W e de sc rib e so m e p ro m isin g lin es o f rese a rc h ex p lo ring th e re spo n se pro c esse s inv o lve d .
EXPLORING MEMORY IN SURVEYS Im a g in e th e fo llow in g: A st ra n g er r in g s yo u r d o o rb e ll, ide n tifies h e rs elf a s w o rk in g f or a su rv e y c o m pa n y , a n d a sk s if y o u w ou ld m in d an s w e r in g so m e qu e st io n s. Y o u a gr e e a n d w elc om e the in te rv iew e r in to y o u r h o m e . T h e in te r view e r r ea d s th e q u es tio ns f ro m a c lip bo a rd a n d r ec o rd s yo u r r e sp o n s es .
N o w im a gin e th is situ atio n: A st ra n g e r w a lk s u p to y o u in a un iv e rs ity c af e te ria , s ay s tha t sh e is do in g p s yc h olo g y re se a rc h , an d as k s if y o u w o uld m in d ta king pa r t in a s tu d y. Y o u ag re e a n d go to a p sy c ho log y la b o ra tor y. S h e a s k s y o u a se r ie s o f q ue st io n s, a n d th en p r es en ts y o u w ith a f ew si m p le tas k s to d o, w h ile sh e r ec o rd s yo u r r e sp on se s .
T h e first situ atio n re fe rs to a n e x p erie nc e a re spo n d en t m igh t h a ve in a fac e-to fa c e surv e y , w h ile th e se co n d re fe rs to a n e x pe rie n c e a sub jec t in a lab o rato ry stu d y m ig h t h av e . A lth ou g h the situa tio n s see m differe n t, a t th e c ore th ey are sim ila r. In ea ch th e v olu n tee r pro v id e s in fo rm a tio n in resp o n se to th e ta sk de m an d s. T h is sim ilarity is p art o f th e rea so n w h y w e fee l th at th e su rve y m ig h t pro fita b ly b e use d m o re fre q ue n tly fo r e x plo ring co g nitive hy p o th e ses (see also Job e & M ing a y, 1 9 9 1; Job e , T o u ra n g ea u , & S m ith , 19 9 3 ; L o ftus, F ie nb e rg, & T a nu r, 19 8 5 ). H o w e ve r, th ere are so m e differe n ce s b etw ee n su rv e y s an d th e ty p ica l la b o rato ry stu d y. O n e is th e sa m p le siz e u su ally use d in ea c h. P sy ch o lo g ists
MEMORY RESEARCH AND CASM
469
o fte n stru gg le to re c ru it en o ug h su bje cts for the ir stu d ie s, a n d still, a s sev era l p ap e rs h av e sh ow n (fo r e xa m p le , C o h en , 1 96 2 , an d se v era l sin c e), o fte n fa il to ac h ie v e satisfa c to ry p ow e r. U sing a su rv e y co m pa n y , w h o h a v e m ec h an ism s in p la ce fo r rec ru itin g la rg e nu m b ers o f re spo n d en ts, se em s an ob v io us so lutio n. T h e m o st c om m o n arg u m e n t a ga in st th is is the pric e. T ru e, if y o u w a n t a sm all sam p le , say 1 00 o r le ss, it is n o t g o in g to b e c ost effe ctive . H o w ev er, fo r la rg e r sam p le s it w ill o fte n b e m o re co st effec tiv e th a n h av in g a p sy ch o lo gy rese arc h assistan t d o it. M u c h p syc h olo g ica l re sea rc h re q uire s la rg e sa m p les, p artic u larly w h e n eith er th e e stim ate d effec t siz e of th e c ritic al c om pa rison is sm all or if it is im p orta nt to e stim a te th e siz e o f th e e ffec t fa irly p re cise ly . C o n sid e r W rig h t, G ask e ll, an d O ’ M u irch e artaig h (19 9 7 ). T he y w ere in tere sted in B ro w n , R ips, an d S he v ell’ s (19 8 5 , p .1 4 1) a cc e ssib ility p rinc ip le w hic h sta te s th a t ``th e m ore y ou k n ow , th e m o re rec e n t th e e v en t w ill se e m .’ ’ W rig h t e t a l. tested th is b y ask in g p e op le to sa y w h e n M arg a ret T h a tc h er resig ne d as P rim e M in iste r o f the U n ite d K in g do m . If B ro w n e t al. w ere rig h t, p e op le un d ere stim a tin g th e ela pse d tim e (i.e . fo rw a rd te le sc o pin g th e da te) sh ou ld h a ve cle are r m em orie s o f th e ev e n t th an th o se ov e restim atin g th e ela p se d tim e (i.e . b a ck w a rd telesc o p in g ). B e ca us e the re are sev er al rea so ns w h y so m e on e c ou ld e ith e r u nd e r or o v er e stim ate th e ela pse d tim e, th e effe ct c o uld b e sm all an d the refo re ov e r 2 00 0 p eo p le w e re qu e stio n ed in o rde r to ac h ie v e sa tisfa c to ry p ow e r. T h e resu lts d id n o t su pp o rt the ac ce ssib ility p rin cip le; pe o ple w h o u nd e restim a te d th e e lap se d tim e d id no t h av e c le are r m e m o rie s. B ec a use o f the sa m p le size , W rig h t e t al. w ere a b le to a rgu e th at if a n y effec t w a s p re se nt, it w as m in u te. T h e re is n o th in g p articu la rly spe c ia l a bo u t th e su rv ey p ro c ess th at en a ble s larg e sa m p le s to be c o lle c te d . M o x ey an d S a n ford (1 9 9 3) , fo r e x am p le , w ere inte re ste d in th e m e an in gs o f va rio u s v e rba l q u an tifie rs. B e ca u se de fin in g so m e v erb al q u an tifie rs c o uld a lter h o w p e op le de fin e sub se q u en t o n e s, M ox e y an d S an fo rd h ad to use a b etw ee n -su b je cts d e sig n . T o a tta in a p o w e r sim ilar to stud ies usin g w ithin -su bje ct d esig n s, the y q u estio n e d a p pro x im a te ly 1 50 0 p eo p le , usin g stu d e n ts fro m th eir in tro d u cto ry p sy c ho lo gy c o urs e. In g e n era l, w he n it is n ec es sary to u se b etw ee n -su bje cts d e sign s, larg e n um b ers o f su b je cts are o fte n n ee de d . A ltho u g h it is p ossib le to qu e stio n tho u sa nd s o f p eo p le in lab o ra to ry se ttin g s, a s M o xe y a nd S a n fo rd d id , it is o fte n m o re co st-effe ctiv e to o bta in a la rge sa m p le fro m a su rv ey c o m p an y . T h e se c on d d iffe ren c e b e tw e en su rve y s an d lab o rato ry stu d ie s is h o w rep rese n tative th e sa m p le is o f p o p ula tio n o f in tere st. F o r m a ny surv e y s a rep rese n tative sam ple is n e ce ssar y be c au se th e aim of th e su rve y is to e stim ate v alu es fo r th e en tire p o p ula tio n. M an y lab o rato ry stu d ie s p u rpo se fully use a s h om o g en e ou s a sa m p le as p ossib le, so as to m in im ise w ith in- co n ditio n v arian c e. H ow e v e r, w h en a n atu ra lly o c cu rrin g va ria b le , lik e a p e rson ’ s a g e, is of in tere st, the n a m o re d ive rse sam ple is ne ce ssa ry . T h is is som etim es d o ne b y try ing to
470
WRIGHT AND LOFTUS
m a tc h old er m e m b e rs o f a su bje ct pa n el w ith a stu d e nt sam p le , b ut this ca n 1 cre a te difficu ltie s. C o n side r S ch u m an a n d S c o tt’ s (1 9 89 ) stud y o f g en e ration a l differe n ce s in w h a t p eo p le th in k a re im po rtan t e v en ts. T h e y h yp o the sise d th a t ev e n ts o cc ur rin g du rin g a pe rso n ’ s a d o le sce n c e o r ea rly a d ulth oo d w ou ld b e the m o st im p orta n t. U sin g a tele ph o n e su rv e y , ab o ut 1 4 0 0 p eo p le w e re ask e d w h at th e m o st im po rta nt ev e nts w e re du ring th e p re v io us 5 0 y ea rs. R esu lts sh o w ed th a t p e o ple w h o w e re y o u ng a d ults d u rin g th e V ietn am W a r, W orld W a r II, o r th e D e p re ssio n w ere m ore lik e ly to rep o rt th e se ev en ts th an p e op le from o th e r co h or ts, su p p orting S c hu m an n & S co tt’ s h yp o the sis. F o r th is rese a rch , it w a s ne c essa ry to h av e co m pa ra ble sam p le s o f p e op le fro m e a ch o f sev e ra l ag e ba n ds so th a t th es e d iffe re n c e s co u ld n o t b e a ttrib u te d to d iffe re n t s a m p lin g pro c ed u res. S urv e y c o m p a n ie s are in p lac e to pro v ide th is se rv ice . T h e third d iffe ren c e is the m ate ria ls th at c an be u se d in a su rv e y c om p are d w ith a la bo ra tory . T he n o rm a l o p era tio n of th e su rv e y in terv ie w m ay b e to o re stric tive fo r so m e re sea rch . F o r ex a m p le, it is o fte n n e ce ssa ry to sh o w p e o ple vid e o c lip s o f to -b e-re m e m b e red ite m s, or to re c o rd p rec ise re sp on se tim es (o r ph y sio lo g ic a l m ea su res). A ltho u g h som e in stru m en ts co u ld b e b ro ug h t in to re sp o n de n ts’ h o m e s, this co u ld b e d iffic u lt. T he typ ica l fa ce -to-fa ce surv e y in terv iew u se s o nly o ral q ue stion s w ith a few sh o w ca rd s, w h ich g en e rally co st ex tra . T ele p ho n e in te rv iew s are e v en m o re re stric tiv e . T h ere h as be e n a n in c re a se in co m p ute r assiste d in terv ie w in g (C A I), inc lud in g so m e fa scin a tin g w a y s o f d isp la y in g d a ta w ith n ew m u ltim e d ia tec h n o lo g y . T h is allo w s m o re fle xib ility , a lth o u gh a t pre sen t m o st su rv ey co m p an ies do n o t ta ke fu ll a d va n ta g e of th e p o ssib ilities. A n oth er a spe ct w o rth c on side rin g is w he th er th e surv e y co m pa n y ca n im p le m e n t ex p erim en tal d e sig n s, w h at su rv e y re sea rch e rs o fte n ca ll ``sp lit-b allo t’ ’ de sign s, an d m o re sp e cific a lly if ra nd o m a llo c a tio n c an b e do n e w ith in in te rvie w w o rk lo a d s.
USING THE CASM APPROACH IN MEMORY RESEARCH T h e re ha s be e n a n inc rea se d u rin g th e p a st de c ad e in m em o ry rese arc h e rs a skin g sub je cts ab o u t th eir m em o rie s. T h is in v o lve s sub jec ts n o t ju st d e scrib in g th e co n ten ts o f th eir m e m o rie s, b u t d esc rib ing ``m e ta-c o gn itio n s’ ’ a bo u t th e co n ten ts. F o r ex am p le , su b je c ts m ay b e a sk ed w h eth er th ey ``re m em be r’ ’ som e th in g, o r just ``k n o w ’ ’ so m eth in g . T h is cla ssific ation , o rig ina lly fro m T u lv in g (1 9 85 ), h as sp a rk ed g re at d e ba te am o n g rese arc h ers ab o ut w h a t the se sta tes o f a w are ne ss are (see , fo r e xa m p le , D o n a ldso n , 1 99 6 ). T h is d e ba te h as, in 1
H a v in g a ra n d o m s a m p l e o f y o u n g e r a n d o ld e r a d u l ts a ll o w s t h e re s e a rc h e r to c o m p a re y o u n g
p e o p l e w i th o ld e r p e o p le , in g e n e ra l. O fte n m at c h i n g i s u s e fu l s o th at s o m e as p e c t, li k e g e n e ra l h e a lt h , c a n b e c o n tro lle d fo r. C o m p a ris o n s a re th e n b et w ee n y o u n g an d o ld e r p e o p le , c o n d it io n a l o n g e n e ra l h e a lt h , a n d n o t in g en e ra l.
MEMORY RESEARCH AND CASM
471
a se n se, b ee n p asse d on to su b je cts w h o h a ve to m ak e the se ju d g em e nts. T h ere are ju stifie d co n ce rn s ab o ut h o w su b jec ts u se the se re sp o nse s. In m u ch C A S M re sea rch , effo rt is m a d e to e nsu re tha t resp o n d en ts in te rp ret the m ea n in g o f th e p h ra se s in th e sa m e w ay a s e ac h o th e r (re liab ility ) a n d as th e rese arc h e rs in ten d (v alid ity ). S ev e ral su rv ey o rg an isation s, b oth in go v ern m en t an d in a ca d em ic rese a rc h in stitu tion s, h a ve set u p c og n itiv e la bo ra to rie s to h elp u nd e rsta n d ho w p eo p le a nsw e r su rv e y qu e stio n s (se e W illis, R o ysto n , & B e rcin i, 1 99 1 , fo r ex a m p le ). O fte n pe o ple are sim p ly ask ed w h a t d iffere nt p h rase s m e a n, o r are ask e d to ``th in k a lou d ’ ’ w h ile an sw e rin g , o r ju st a fte r an sw e rin g , a q ue stio n (se e E ric sso n & S im o n , 19 8 4 , fo r th e u se o f in tro sp ec tio n an d retro sp ec tio n in co g nitiv e p syc h o log y ). T h is te c hn iq ue is u se d , for ex a m p le , w ith su rv e y s on th e freq u en c y o f p a st b e ha v io urs to se e if re spo n d en ts are try in g to rec all e ac h relev a n t e p iso d e o r a re try in g to estim a te the fre qu e nc y o f th e b eh a vio ur in so m e oth er w a y . F or ``re m e m be r’ ’ /``k n ow ’ ’ ju d ge m en ts, do pe o p le in te rp ret th es e in a sim ila r m a n ne r to e ac h o th er a n d d o es th is m ap on to th e de fin ition s of th e se te rm s in th e litera tu re ? G ard in er, R am po n i a n d R ic ha rd so n -K la ve h n (in p re ss) c o nd u c te d a stud y to se e h o w pe o ple w ere u sin g th es e p h ra se s. A fte r a ``rem e m b er’ ’ / ``kn ow ’ ’ stud y o n m e m ory fo r w o rd s (G a rd in e r, R ich a rd so n -K la v e h n & R am po n i, 19 9 7 ), su b jec ts w ere a sk ed to ju stify so m e o f th eir re sp on se s. T h is is v e ry sim ila r to so m e of th e re tro sp ec tiv e ``th in k-a lo ud ’ ’ te c h niq u e u se d in co gn itiv e lab o ra torie s. S u b jec ts’ rep o rts sh ow ed th at th ey d id u se th e se resp o n ses fo r q u alita tive ly differe n t ty p es of m em o ry , th us sup p o rtin g T u lv in g ’ s cla ssific ation . A no the r te ch n iq u e tha t is u sed in C A S M rese arc h to asse ss h o w w o rds are u sed , is to a sk p eo p le to rate a giv e n sc e na rio . F o r ex a m p le, S ch w a rz an d co llea g u es (1 9 8 8; se e a lso G a sk ell, O ’ M u irc h ea rta ig h, & W rig ht, 19 9 4 ) a ske d p eo p le h o w o ften the y g ot ``rea lly a nn o y ed ’ ’ . T he y u sed o ne o f tw o sets o f resp o n se a lte rn a tiv e s. T h e first set co n ce n tra ted at lo w fre qu e n cie s, su gg e stin g tha t b e in g ``re ally a n no y e d’ ’ w as a ra re e ve n t. A se co n d set c o n ce n tra ted at hig h freq u en c ies, su gg e stin g th at the ev en ts w o uld b e m u c h m o re freq u e nt, an d the refo re , o n a ve rag e , le ss a n no y in g. T he ir resp o n de n ts w ere th en a sk ed to ra te a sce n ario fo r th e a m o u nt o f a nn o y a nc e . T ho se in th e low -freq u e nc y c on d itio n g av e lo w er ra tin g s fo r th e sc e na rio , im p lyin g th a t th eir d efin itio n o f a ``re a lly an n o yin g ’ ’ ev e nt w as m or e sev e re th an th ose in th e h igh -freq u e nc y co n d ition . H en rich s an d C o n w ay (1 99 7 ) w e re in ve stiga tin g h ow ``rem em b er’ ’ an d ``kn o w ’ ’ re spo n se p attern s v aried ov e r the co u rse o f le a rn in g n e w v o ca b u la ry. S u bje cts w e re tau g h t d e fin itio n s fo r n o n -w o rd s o v er se ve ral trails, a nd te ste d afte r e ac h tria l. O v e r tim e , th e y b eg a n to ``k no w ’ ’ m o re d efinitio n s an d ``re m e m be r’ ’ le ss, su g ge sting th at the se de fin itio n s w ere b ec o m in g p a rt o f sem an tic m e m o ry . H e nric h s an d C o n w a y w ere a w are o f the c on tro ve rsy a bo u t h ow su b je cts u se ``rem e m b er’ ’ an d ``k n o w ’ ’ resp on se s. A fte r th e te st, su b je cts w ere p re sen ted w ith so m e m e m o ry d e scrip tio n s, an d a sk ed w he the r th es e w ere
472
WRIGHT AND LOFTUS
``re m e m b e r’ ’ o r ``k n o w ’ ’ re sp o n ses. H en rich s an d C on w a y the n re-a n aly se d th e da ta e xc lud in g th e p eo p le w h o ga v e re spo n ses in co n siste n t w ith th e a uth o rs’ be lie fs, a n d fou n d th a t th e tra nsitio n fro m ``rem e m b er’ ’ to ``k n o w ’ ’ w a s ev e n m o re p ro no u n c ed . M u c h of th e C A S M rese a rch in vo lv es a sk ing p e op le tw o d iffe ren t typ e s o f qu e stio n s, o r th e sa m e q u e stio n in tw o d iffere n t co n tex ts, an d se ein g w he th er th e re sp o n se p a tte rns d iffer fo r the tw o gro u ps . L oftu s, K ling e r, S m ith, a nd F ie dle r (1 9 9 0) , for e xa m p le, w e re in tere ste d in th e be st w a y to a sk pe o ple ab o u t the ir m e d ic a l tre atm en t o v er a se t tim e pe rio d . T h e y ask e d p eo p le if, for ex am p le, th e y h ad ha d a b loo d p re ssure re a din g. M e d ic al re c o rds ex iste d to c he c k ac cu ra c y. S om e resp o n de n ts w e re ask e d if th ey h a d ha d o ne in the last six m o n th s an d th en ask e d if th e y h a d ha d o n e in th e la st tw o m o nth s. O th e r re sp o n de n ts w e re a sk ed the se qu e stio n s bu t in the o p po site o rd er. T h e e stim ates fo r th e q u estio n ask e d sec o nd , re g a rd less of w h ic h c on d itio n th e resp o n de n ts w e re in , w ere m o re a c cu ra te c o m p are d w ith the sa m e q ue stio n in th e o th e r co n ditio n. L o ftus e t a l. arg u e d th at th is w as b e ca u se, w h e n ask ed m ultiple qu e stio n s in w h ich tw o tim e -fra m es a re m en tion e d, resp o n d en ts rea lise tha t th e in terv iew e r m e an s tha t sp e cific tim e . S up p o se y o u h a d y o ur b loo d p re ssu re tak e n th re e m o n th s a go , a nd are a sk ed if y ou ha v e h ad it ta k en in th e la st tw o m o n th s. In na tu ral lan g u ag e , pe o ple o fte n a ssum e this w o u ld m e a n in a b o ut th e last tw o m o n th s. B ec au se y o u a re a h e lp fu l resp o n de n t, a n d y ou h a v e in fo rm atio n tha t yo u thin k th e in te rv ie w e r w o u ld w a n t to k n o w , yo u w o u ld te ll th e in terv ie w e r ab o ut th is ex p erie nc e . H o w e v e r, if y o u are first ask e d w ith a six -m o n th re fere nc e pe rio d an d th e n a ske d w ith the tw o -m o n th refe ren c e p erio d, y o u kn o w th at th e qu e stio n refe rs to th e sp ec ific tim e p erio d. T h e c urre n t are a o f m o st fe rv e n t d eb a te in m e m o ry re sea rc h is w h e th e r pe o ple ``re co v e r’ ’ a cc u ra te m em o rie s of the ir c h ild h oo d th a t th ey p rev iou sly d id no t re m e m b e r (see , fo r e x am ple , L in dsa y & R e a d , 1 9 94 ; L o ftu s, 19 9 3 ). It is cla im ed tha t p rior to ``re co v e rin g ’ ’ th ese m e m o ries, m an y o f th e se p eo p le h av e ex te nd e d g a ps in th eir m e m o ries o f c h ild h oo d . T h ese ga p s are a lle g e d to b e w h e n th e pe rso n w a s be in g se v ere ly trau m atise d (u sua lly c h ild sex u a l a bu se ). If a m e n ta l h e alth w o rk e r su sp e cts so m eo n e h a s b ee n se v ere ly trau m a tise d , the y ofte n ask the p erso n if th ere a re larg e pa rts of (u su ally) h e r ch ild h o o d th at sh e do e s n o t rem em b e r. W ha t is th e reliab ility o f th is q ue stio n , p artic u la rly co n sid ering tha t it m ig ht ha v e ju st fo llo w ed q ue stion s a bo u t c h ild h oo d life ev e nts (p o o r m e m o ry fo r w h ic h m ig h t h av e raise d th e m en ta l h e alth w o rk e r’ s susp ic io n to a sk th e q u estio n )? W in kie lm an , S c h w arz , a n d B e lli (in p ress; se e a lso B e lli e t a l., in pre ss) ask e d un iv ersity stu d en ts if th ey h ad a m n e sia c ga p s for the ir ch ild h o o d a fter a skin g th e m to re ca ll m e m o rie s o f ch ild h o o d. In o ne ex p er im en t (E x p . 1), su b jec ts eithe r re ca lle d fo ur or tw e lve m em o rie s. A lth o ug h the pe o p le in the tw e lv e m e m o ries c o nd ition re ca lled a pp ro x im ate ly th re e tim e s a s m a n y m e m o ries, the y w e re m o re lik ely to sa y tha t th e y h a d am n esiac g a ps. In fa c t, o ve r h alf o f th e
MEMORY RESEARCH AND CASM
473
p eo p le in th is co n d itio n said th ey h a d th e se g ap s. W in kie lm a n et a l. e x pla in e d this so m e w ha t pa rad o x ica l re su lt, th at p eo p le w h o re ca ll m ore m e m o ries c o m e to b elie v e th ey h a v e m o re m em ory g ap s, as b ein g d u e to the diffic u lty of th e task . A lth o u gh m ost o f th eir sub je cts co u ld re ca ll tw elv e e v en ts, the y fo u n d it d ifficu lt. T h is led th e m to th ink th at the y h a d po o r m e m o ries. T h e p e op le rec alling o nly fo u r e ve n ts fo un d th e task m u c h sim p ler. T h e un relia bility of th e resp o n ses to this qu e stio n ra ises do u b t fo r its u se a s a d ia g n o stic c rite rio n fo r eith er ch ild h o o d se xu a l a bu se o r a n y fo rm o f disso cia tiv e d isord e r. T h is is p art ic u lar ly im p o rta n t co n sid e rin g th a t m a n y m e n ta l h e a lth p ro fe ssio n a ls rou tine ly a sk clien ts to tell th e m a b ou t th e ir c h ild ho o d .
FINAL REMARK S u rv e y d a ta u n d erlie m u c h scie n tific rese arc h a nd in fo rm ev e ryth in g from b usin ess le ad e rs m a rk e tin g co n su m e r go o d s to g o ve rn m e n t m in isters d ec idin g o n fo re ign p o lic y. T h e re lia b ility o f the se da ta, o n w h ich im p orta nt d ec isio n s are m a d e, is pa ram o u nt. U nd e rsta n d in g h o w p e o ple re spo n d in th ese surv e y s is o bv io u sly va lu ab le. W e ha v e c h ose n to en d this sp ec ia l issu e by stressin g h o w this c o lla b o ra tiv e res ea rc h c a n a lso b en e fit c o g n itiv e p syc h o lo g ists. O u r u n d er sta n d in g of c o g n itiv e p ro c es ses h a s b e en a d v a nc e d g rea tly b y th e co n trib u tio n s o f la b o ra tory -b ase d re se arc h . H o w e ve r, w e b e lie ve th e re is o fte n m o re to b e a cc o m plishe d by b e in g o pe n to su rve y m e th od o log y a nd a lter na tiv e m e tho d s o f g a th e rin g d ata .
REFERENCES B e ll i, R .F ., W in k i e lm an , P ., R e a d , J .D ., S c h w a rz , N ., & L y n n , S .J. (in p re ss ). R e c a llin g m o re c h i ld h o o d e v en ts le a d s to j u d g m e n ts o f p o o r er m e m o ry : Im p lic a tio n s fo r t h e re c o v e red /fa ls e m e m o ry d e b a t e . P s y c h o n o m ic B u lle t in & R e v ie w . B ro w n , N .R ., R ip s , L .J., & S h e v e ll , S .K . (1 9 8 5 ). S u b je c ti v e d a te s o f n a tu ra l e v e n ts in v e ry lo n g te rm m e m o ry . C o g n it iv e P sy c h o l o g y , 1 7 , 1 3 9 ±1 7 7 . C o h e n , J . (1 9 6 2 ). T h e s ta ti s tic a l p o w er o f a b n o r m a l -s o ci a l res e a rc h : A re v ie w . J o u r n a l o f A b n o rm a l a n d S o ci a l P s y c h o lo g y , 6 5 , 1 4 5 ±1 6 3 . D o n a ld s o n , W . (1 9 9 6 ) . T h e ro l e o f d e c is io n p ro c e s s es in re m e m b e rin g a n d k n o w in g . M e m o ry & C o g n itio n , 2 4 , 5 2 3 ±5 3 3 . E ri c ss o n , K .A ., & S im o n , H .A . (1 9 8 4 ). P ro to c o l a n a l y si s: V e r b a l r e p o r ts a s d a ta . C am b rid g e, M A : M IT P re s s. G a rd i n e r, J .M ., R am p o n i , C ., & R ic h a rd s o n - K l a v e h n , A . (in p re ss ). E x p er ie n c es o f re m e m b erin g , k n o w i n g , a n d g u e s s in g . C o n sc i o u s n e ss a n d C o g n it io n . G a rd in e r , J .M ., R ic h a r d s o n -K l a v e h n , A ., &
R a m p o n i , C . (1 9 9 7 ) . O n
re p o rti n g
re c o ll e c t iv e
e x p e rie n ce s a n d ``d i re c t a c ce s s to m em o ry s y s te m s ’ ’ . P s y c h o lo g ic a l S c ie n c e , 8 , 3 9 1 ±3 9 4 . G a sk e ll , G .D ., O ’ M u i rch ea rt a ig h , C .A ., &
W rig h t , D .B . (1 9 9 4 ). S u rv e y q u e s tio n s a b o u t th e
fre q u e n c y o f v a g u e ly d e fin e d e v e n ts : T h e e ffe c ts o f re sp o n s e a lt er n a ti v e s . P u b l ic O p in io n Q u a r te r ly, 5 8 , 2 4 1 ±2 5 4 . H e n ri ch s , C ., & C o n w a y , M .A . (1 9 9 7 ). C h an g e s in m e m o ry aw a re n e ss d u rin g a n d a ft er re p ea t ed le a rn i n g . P a p e r p re s e n t e d a t t h e B P S C o g n itiv e S e c ti o n A n n u a l C o n fe re n c e, B ris to l, U K .
474
WRIGHT AND LOFTUS
Ja b in e , T .B ., S tra f, M .L ., T a n u r, J .M ., & T o u ra n g e a u , R . (E d s .) ( 1 9 8 4 ). C o g n itive a s p e c ts o f s u rv e y m e t h o d o lo g y: B u i ld in g a b r i d g e b e t w e en d is c ip lin es . W a s h in g to n D C : N a tio n a l A c a d e m ic P re s s . Jo b e , J .B ., & M i n g a y , D .J. (1 9 9 1 ). C o g n it io n a n d s u rv e y m ea s u rem e n t: H i st o ry a n d o v e rv ie w . A p p li e d C o g n it iv e P s y c h o lo g y , 5 , 1 7 5 ±1 9 2 . Jo b e , J .B ., T o u ran g e a u , R ., &
S m i th , A .F . (1 9 9 3 ) . C o n t rib u ti o n s o f s u rv e y re s e ar ch to th e
u n d e rs ta n d i n g o f m e m o ry . A p p li ed C o g n itiv e P s yc h o lo g y, 7 , 5 6 7 ±5 8 4 . L in d sa y , D .S ., & R ea d , J.D . (1 9 9 4 ). P s y c h o t h e rap y a n d m e m o rie s o f ch il d h o o d s e x u a l ab u se : A c o g n i tiv e p e rs p e c ti v e . A p p lie d C o g n itiv e P sy c h o l o g y , 8 , 2 8 1 ±3 3 8 . L o ftu s, E .F . (1 9 9 3 ). T h e re a li ty o f re p re s se d m e m o rie s . A m e r ic a n P s y c h o lo g is t, 4 8 , 5 1 8 ±5 3 7 . L o ftu s, E .F ., F ie n b e rg , S .E ., & T an u r, J .M . (1 9 8 5 ) . C o g n it iv e p s y c h o l o g y m e e ts th e n a t io n a l s u r v e y . A m e ri c a n P s y c h o lo g i st, 4 0 , 1 7 5 ±1 8 0 . L o ftu s, E .F ., K li n g e r, M .R ., S m it h , K .D ., & F ie d le r, J . (1 9 9 0 ). A ta le o f t w o q u e s ti o n s : B e n e fit s o f a s k in g m o re th an o n e q u e s ti o n . P u b l ic O p in io n Q u a r t er l y, 5 4 , 3 3 0 ±3 4 5 . M o ss , L ., & G o l d s te i n , H . (E d s .) (1 9 7 9 ). T h e r e ca ll m e th o d i n so c ia l su r v e ys . L o n d o n : In s ti tu te o f E d u c a ti o n . M o x e y , L .M ., & S a n f o rd , A .J. (1 9 9 3 ). P rio r e x p e c ta t io n a n d t h e in te rp re ta tio n o f n a tu ra l la n g u a g e q u a n t ifie rs . E u r o p e a n J o u r n a l o f C o g n it iv e P sy c h o l o g y , 5 , 7 3 ±9 1 . S c h u m a n , H ., & S c o tt, J. (1 9 8 9 ). G e n er at io n s a n d c o ll ec t iv e m e m o rie s . A m e r ic a n S o ci o l o g ic a l R e v ie w , 5 4 , 3 5 9 ±3 8 1 . S c h w a rz , N ., S tra c k , F ., M uÈ lle r, G ., & C h a s s e in , B . (1 9 8 8 ) . T h e ra n g e o f re s p o n s e al te rn at iv e s m a y d e te rm i n e th e m ea n in g o f th e q u e s tio n : F u rth er e v id e n c e o n i n fo rm a tiv e fu n c tio n s o f re sp o n s e a l te rn at iv e s. S o ci a l C o g n itio n , 6 , 1 0 7 ±1 1 7 . T a n u r, J .M . (E d .) (1 9 9 2 ) . Q u es t io n s a b o u t q u e s ti o n s : In q u ir ie s i n t o th e c o g n itiv e b a se s o f s u r v e y s . N e w Y o rk : R u s s e ll S a g e F o u n d a t io n . T u lv in g , E . ( 1 9 8 5 ). H o w m a n y m e m o ry s y s te m s a re th e re ? A m e r ic a n P s y c h o lo g is t, 4 0 , 3 8 5 ±3 9 8 . W il lis, G .B ., R o y s t o n , P ., &
B e rc i n i, D . (1 9 9 1 ) . T h e u s e o f v e rb a l re p o rt m e th o d s i n th e
d e v el o p m e n t a n d t e st in g o f s u rv e y q u e s ti o n n aire s . A p p lie d C o g n itiv e P s yc h o l o g y , 5 , 2 5 1 ±2 6 7 . W in k ie lm a n , P ., S c h w a rz , N ., & B e lli, R .F . (i n p re s s ). T h e ro le o f ea s e o f re trie v a l a n d a tt rib u t io n in m e m o ry ju d g m e n ts : J u d g in g y o u r m e m o ry as w o rs e d e sp it e re c a llin g m o re e v e n ts . P s yc h o lo g ic a l S c ie n c e. W ri g h t, D .B ., G a s k e l l, G .D ., & O ’ M u i rc h ea rt a ig h , C .A . ( 1 9 9 7 ). T e m p o ra l e s tim a t io n o f m a jo r n e w s e v e n t s : R e -e x a m in in g t h e a c c es s ib il ity p rin c ip le . A p p lie d C o g n itiv e P s y c h o l o g y, 1 1 , 3 5 ±4 6 .
